alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
				Here's how you know we're official. **Official websites use .gov** A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure websites use HTTPS** A small lock or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to a .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Toggle navigation Toggle search National Ocean Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
 Search
					Search National Ocean Service


Home
				Ocean Facts

				Topics
					Explore All Topics 
                        Arctic 
                        Careers 
                        Economy 
                        Ecosystems 
                        Geodesy 
                        Hazards 
                        International
                        Navigation 
                        Observations 
                        Ocean 
                        Recreation 
                         Sea Level Rise 
                        Story Maps 
                        Tools
                
                			Education

				
				News
				Podcasts
				Video
				Images
				About Us


1. Home
2. Ocean Video

Maritime Transportation: What is sonar? Sanctuaries: The Underwater Museum (Ocean Today) Explore With Us (Ocean Today) Leave Only Bubbles (Ocean Today) Adventures of a Maritime Archaeologist (Ocean Today) What is Maritime Archaeology? (Ocean Today) Journey Through Time (Ocean Today) Ocean Time Capsules (Ocean Today) Mapping Goes Micro (Ocean Today) Charting new waters (Podcast) Measuring water levels with microwaves (Podcast) Ocean as a Lab: Oil Spills (Ocean Today) Ocean as a Lab: Trouvadore Shipwreck (Ocean Today) Life at Sea (Ocean Today) Travel the Seas (Ocean Today) USS Monitor: The Ironclad Endures (Ocean Today)
 Browse Ocean Video  By Category Ocean Basics Ocean Life Ocean Economy Ocean Ecosystems Health & Safety Maritime Transportation Positioning and Geology Ocean Technology Tides and Currents Ocean Observations Ocean and Coastal Places Ocean and Coastal Science     **Search** Our Stories    Get **Social**


Feedback Provide Feedback
							Contact Us
							Report an error
 Social Instagram Logo/a>


*Science. Service.Stewardship.*
 About NOS About Us
							NOS Program Offices
							Media Inquiries
							Website Acknowledgements
                            Site Index
							Disclaimer
 More Resources Freedom of Information Act
							Accessibility
							Information Quality
							Privacy Policy
							NOS For Employees
							USA.gov
 Department of Commerce
									National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
									National Ocean Service
HomeOcean Facts

# What was the first national marine sanctuary to be designated?

## The USS *Monitor* was designated our first National Marine Sanctuary on January 30, 1975 

The USS *Monitor* was the prototype for a class of U.S. Civil War ironclad, turreted warships that significantly altered both naval technology and marine architecture in the nineteenth century. The vessel was constructed in 110 days. 

The USS *Monitor* was the first of the marine protected areas that make up the National Marine Sanctuary System. The sanctuary boundaries protect the wreck of the USS *Monitor*, which lies southeast of Cape Hatteras, North Carolina. Since its sinking in 1862, the *Monitor* has become a productive artificial reef. 

While most of the research conducted in the *Monitor* sanctuary has focused on the archaeological documentation of the shipwreck, NOAA scientists are now interested in studying the water quality and marine environment of the wreck site. A NOAA data buoy installed in the sanctuary in 2006 is providing scientists and the public the opportunity to monitor weather and sea conditions 24 hours a day.

Management of the sanctuary is focused on preventing further deterioration of the wreck, recovery of important ship components and artifacts, and protecting the wreck from damage by human activities such as vessel anchoring and fishing. Access is generally limited to scientific research conducted under a permit issued by NOAA; however, special-use permits are issued for non-research visits to this historic vessel. 

###### Get **Social**

###### More **Information**

          -  Office of National Marine Sanctuaries
          -  Monitor National Marine Sanctuary

**Last updated:**   01/18/24**Author:** NOAAHow to cite this article

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
# Official Journal C 104I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 104I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6426 March 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 104I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6426 March 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 104 I/01 | Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 104 I/01

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4874 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Solvent Violet 13. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2007 

Mr. CLAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Solvent Violet 13. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SOLVENT VIOLET 13. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.l.l Solvent Violet 13 (CAS No. 

81–48–1) (provided for in 

subheading 3204.19.25) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4874 IH

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
# C_2013038EN.01001002.xml

| 9.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/10

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 November 2012 — Luigi Marcuccio v European Commission

(Case C-1/11 SA) (1)

1

(Application for leave to serve a garnishee order on the European Union)

2013/C 38/12

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C. Berardis-Kayser, Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Protocol on privileges and immunities — Application for leave to serve a garnishee order on the Commission in respect of sums owing to the European Union by the Italian Republic and, in the alternative, in respect of movable property belonging to the European Union held in the Italian Republic — Waiver of the Commission’s immunity — Article 1 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for a garnishee order is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for a garnishee order is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Luigi Marcuccio and the European Commission are ordered to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Luigi Marcuccio and the European Commission are ordered to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 89, 24.3.2012.

1

---
POMPANO MASONRY CORP. v. HDR ARCH.

No. 450PA04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 21, 2004.

Robert C. Bowers, George V. Hanna, III, Charlotte, for HDR Architecture, Inc.

David Hill Bashford, Charlotte, for Pompano Masonry Corp.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th day of December 2004 by Plaintiff for Extension of Time to File Brief:

> "Motion Allowed. Plaintiff (Pompano Masonry Corp.) shall have up to and including the 12th day of January 2005 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 21st day of December 2004."
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Hamish Malkin, CFO
and Secretary of Entree Gold Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1)    
   the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Entree Gold Inc. for the period ended June 30,
2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the          requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2)    
   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of          Entree Gold Inc.
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:   August 11, 2005 /s/ Hamish Malkin
Hamish Malkin 
CFO and Secretary 
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer)

---
Susan LEVY, Petitioner v. BASF METALS LIMITED, et al.

No. 19-397

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS I, Robert P. May, the Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of CCO Holdings, LLC and
CCO Holdings Capital Corp. (the Company) in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the Report) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission:  
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Robert P. MayRobert P. MayInterim President and Chief Executive OfficerMay 11, 2005
YOUNG v. GREAT AMERICAN INS. CO.

No. 54A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 6, 2004.

Susan K. Burkhardt, Raleigh, for Great American Ins. Co. of NY.

Mark Davis, Raleigh, for City of Fayetteville.

William Peregoy, Wilmington, for Young.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th day of April 2004 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

> "Motion Allowed. Defendant (Wortham, Pechie, and Peele) shall have up to and including the 19th day of April 2004 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of April 2004."
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1443 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1443

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to recognize tinnitus as a 
  mandatory condition for research and treatment by the Department of 
               Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 9, 2013

 Mr. Michaud introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to recognize tinnitus as a 
  mandatory condition for research and treatment by the Department of 
               Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tinnitus Research and Treatment Act 
of 2013''.

SEC. 2. RECOGNITION AND TREATMENT OF TINNITUS AT DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 
              AFFAIRS AUDITORY CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE.

    The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall recognize tinnitus as a 
mandatory condition for research and treatment by the Department of 
Veterans Affairs Auditory Centers of Excellence.

SEC. 3. RESEARCH ON PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF TINNITUS.

    The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall ensure that research is 
conducted at Department of Veterans Affairs facilities on the 
prevention and treatment of tinnitus. Such research shall include--
            (1) an assessment of the efficacy of multidisciplinary 
        tinnitus treatment modalities on different subsets of patients;
            (2) studies on the underlying etiology of tinnitus in 
        veteran populations that occur as a result of different causal 
        factors, including blast-related tinnitus where there is no 
        measurable hearing loss versus other forms of noise-induced 
        tinnitus where there is hearing loss; and
            (3) a study of the underlying mechanisms between hearing 
        loss and tinnitus, including cases in which one or the other 
        condition is present, but not both.

SEC. 4. INTERDEPARTMENTAL COOPERATION.

    The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall ensure the cooperation of 
the Department of Veterans Affairs with the Hearing Center of 
Excellence established by the Department of Defense to further research 
on tinnitus.
                                 <all>
```
Modeling Marine Ecosystems With Virtual Reality:

Ocean Food Web Module Worksheet #3

Hypothesis: Biomass in Monterey Bay

Next to the scale below, write each of the four words “sardine”, “orca”, “sea lion” and “blue whale” at

places along the scale that correspond to the relative amount of biomass you expect for each

organism. Use your knowledge of the relationship between trophic level and biomass or between

organism size and biomass to guide you.

Low Biomass

High Biomass

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
HUMANE SOCIETY OF UNION COUNTY, INC. v. Naomi Delores PEREZ.

No. 178P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 24, 2004.

Donald M. Brown, Jr., Charlotte, for Naomi Delores Perez.

Rodney Alexander, Charlotte, Jay C. Johnson, Washington, DC, for Humane Society of Union Co.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 16th day of April 2004 in this matter for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 prior to a determination by the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 OCTOBER 4, 2010

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 10-12240 

Non-Argument Calendar

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 8:04-cr-00265-SCB-MAP-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ROSANNE ERON SIMPSON,

a.k.a. Kevin Smith,

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant.

________________________

 Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Middle District of Florida

 ________________________

(October 4, 2010)

Before BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Leonard E. Clark, appointed counsel for Rosanne Eron Simpson in this 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) proceeding, has moved to withdraw from further

representation of Simpson and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the

entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is

correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguably

meritorious issues, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district

court’s denial of Simpson’s § 3582(c)(2) motion to reduce his sentence is

AFFIRMED.

2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7228

GUY LANCASTER RICHMOND,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INCORPORATED; WARDEN

WATERS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Edward S. Northrop, Senior District Judge.

(CA-95-807-N)

Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 1, 1996

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Guy Lancaster Richmond, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Barry Chazen,

MEYERS, BILLINGSLEY, SHIPLEY, RODBELL & ROSENBAUM, Riverdale,

Maryland; John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Richard M.

Kastendieck, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore,

Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Richmond v. Prison Health Servs., No. CA-95-807-N (D. Md.

July 31, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# L_2016305EN.01002901.xml

| 12.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 305/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 305/29

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2016/1981

of 8 November 2016

appointing an alternate member, proposed by the Kingdom of Sweden, of the Committee of the Regions

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Swedish Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 26 January 2015, 5 February 2015 and 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020. On 20 July 2015, by Council Decision (EU) 2015/1203 (4), Mr Kenth LÖVGREN was replaced by Ms Ingeborg WIKSTEN as an alternate member. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 26 January 2015, 5 February 2015 and 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020. On 20 July 2015, by Council Decision (EU) 2015/1203 (4), Mr Kenth LÖVGREN was replaced by Ms Ingeborg WIKSTEN as an alternate member.

| (2) | An alternate member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Ms Ingeborg WIKSTEN, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

An alternate member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Ms Ingeborg WIKSTEN,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is hereby appointed as an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2020:

| — | Mr Mohamad HASSAN, Ledamot i kommunfullmäktige, Uppsala kommun. |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Mohamad HASSAN, Ledamot i kommunfullmäktige, Uppsala kommun.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 8 November 2016.

For the Council

The President

P. KAŽIMÍR

---

(1)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/116 of 26 January 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 20, 27.1.2015, p. 42).

1

(2)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/190 of 5 February 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 31, 7.2.2015, p. 25).

2

(3)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/994 of 23 June 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 159, 25.6.2015, p. 70).

3

(4)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/1203 of 20 July 2015 appointing three Swedish members and six Swedish alternate members of the Committee of the Regions (OJ L 195, 23.7.2015, p. 44).

4

---
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Premier Alliance Group, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March
31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), Mark S. Elliott, Acting Chief Executive and Financial
Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Premier Alliance Group, Inc., and will be retained by Premier
Alliance Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.


/s/ Mark S. Elliott
----------------------
Mark S. Elliott
Acting Chief Executive and Financial Officer
May 15, 2007