Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 14, 2022 / Notices 35995 

OHIO 

Cuyahoga County 

Audubon School, 3055 Martin Luther King Jr. 

Dr., Cleveland, SG100007904 

McKinley School, 3349 W 125th St., 

Cleveland, SG100007907 

TENNESSEE 

Dickson County 

Montgomery Bell CCC Camp SP–5/NP–15, 

1020 Jackson Hill Rd., Burns, 

SG100007906 

Additional documentation has been 

received for the following resources: 

ARIZONA 

Yavapai County 

East Prescott Historic District (Additional 

Documentation), (Prescott Territorial 

Buildings MRA), 512 East Willis St., 

Prescott, AD89000165 

MAINE 

York County 

Kennebunk Historic District (Additional 

Documentation), Vicinity of Summer, 

Maine, Portland, Fletcher, and Dane St., 

Kennebunk, AD74000324 

MONTANA 

Sanders County 

Thompson Falls Hydroelectric Dam Historic 

District (Additional Documentation) 

(Thompson Falls MRA), US ALT 10 at 

Clark Fork River within NW part of 

Thompson Falls, Thompson Falls vicinity, 

AD86002756 

NEW JERSEY 

Passaic County 

Belle Vista (Additional Documentation), 3 

Valley Rd., Paterson, AD76001180 

Nominations submitted by Federal 

Preservation Officers: 

The State Historic Preservation 

Officer reviewed the following 

nominations and responded to the 

Federal Preservation Officer within 45 

days of receipt of the nominations and 

supports listing the properties in the 

National Register of Historic Places. 

ALABAMA 

Baldwin County 

C.S.S. HUNTSVILLE and C.S.S. 

TUSCALOOSA Historic and 

Archaeological District, Address 

Restricted, Mobile vicinity, SG100007894 

CALIFORNIA 

Santa Barbara County 

Santa Rosa Island Archeological District, 

Address Restricted, Santa Rosa Island 

vicinity, SG100007896 

NEW YORK 

Albany County 

Albany VA Main Hospital Building, (United 

States Third Generation Veterans 

Hospitals, 1946–1958 MPS), 113 Holland 

Ave., Albany, MP100007908 

Westchester County 

Franklin Delano Roosevelt Veterans Hospital 

Historic District, (United States Third 

Generation Veterans Hospitals, 1946–1958 

MPS), 2094 Albany Post Rd., Montrose, 

MP100007887 

(Authority: Section 60.13 of 36 CFR part 60) 

Dated: June 7, 2022. 

Sherry A. Frear, 

Chief, National Register of Historic Places/ 

National Historic Landmarks Program. 

[FR Doc. 2022–12789 Filed 6–13–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–52–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1295] 

Certain Integrated Circuit Products and 

Devices Containing the Same; 

Commission Determination Not To 

Review an Initial Determination 

Granting Complainant’s Motions To 

Terminate the Investigation Based on 

Withdrawal and Settlement; 

Termination of the Investigation In Its 

Entirety 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review the presiding administrative law 

judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination 

(‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 17), granting 

complainant’s motions to terminate the 

investigation based on withdrawal and 

settlement. The investigation is 

terminated in its entirety. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Cathy Chen, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202– 

205–2392. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on January 31, 2022, based on a 

complaint, as supplemented, filed on 

behalf of Future Link Systems, LLC of 

Santa Clara, California. 87 FR 4915 (Jan. 

31, 2022). The complaint, as 

supplemented, alleged violations of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, based upon 

the importation into the United States, 

the sale for importation, and the sale 

within the United States after 

importation of certain integrated circuit 

products and devices containing the 

same that infringe one of more of claims 

1–6 of U.S. Patent No. 7,685,439 and 

claims 1–9 of U.S. Patent No. 8,099,614. 

Id. at 4916. The complaint also alleged 

the existence of a domestic industry. Id. 

The Commission’s notice of 

investigation named seventeen 

respondents: Advanced Micro Devices, 

Inc. of Santa Clara, CA; Apple, Inc. of 

Cupertino, CA; Broadcom Inc. of San 

Jose, CA; Broadcom Corp. of San Jose, 

CA; Qualcomm Inc. of San Diego, CA; 

Qualcomm Technologies Inc. of San 

Diego, CA; Amlogic Holdings Ltd. of 

Cayman Islands; Amlogic (CA) Co., Inc. 

of Santa Clara, CA; Realtek 

Semiconductor Corp. of Taiwan 

(‘‘Realtek’’); Dell Technologies Inc. of 

Round Rock, TX; HP INC. of Palo Alto, 

CA; Acer Inc. of Taiwan; Acer America 

Corp. of San Jose, CA; Lenovo Group 

Ltd. of Hong Kong, China; Lenovo 

(United States) Inc. of Morrisville, NC; 

Motorola Mobility LLC of Chicago, IL; 

and Google LLC of Mountain View, CA. 

Id. The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) was also named 

as a party in this investigation. Id. 

On April 28, 2022, Complainant filed 

a motion to terminate the investigation 

as to Respondent Realtek based on 

withdrawal of the complaint. ID at 1. 

Thereafter, on May 6, 2022, 

Complainant filed a motion to terminate 

the investigation as to all remaining 

Respondents other than Realtek based 

on a single patent license agreement and 

multiple release agreements. Id. at 1–2. 

Realtek opposed the motions to the 

extent they would prevent the ALJ from 

ruling on any pending issues. Id. at 1, 

2. OUII filed statements in support of 

the motions. Id. All other Respondents 

either did not oppose or did not take a 

position on the motions. Id. 

On May 31, 2022, the ALJ issued the 

subject ID (Order No. 17), granting 

Complainant’s motions to terminate the 

investigation. The ID found that the 

motion to terminate Respondent Realtek 

complies with Commission Rule 

210.21(a), 19 CFR 210.21(a), and there 

are no extraordinary circumstances 

preventing the withdrawal. Id. at 3–4. 

As for the motion to terminate all 

other Respondents, the ID noted that not 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
35996 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 14, 2022 / Notices 

all Respondents other than Realtek are 

named in the patent license agreement 

and/or release agreements. Id. at 4 n.2. 

For those not named, the ID stated that 

‘‘termination by settlement under 

Commission Rule 210.21(b) would not 

be appropriate, as opposed to general 

withdrawal under Commission Rule 

210.21(a).’’ Id. The ID found that 

‘‘[r]egardless, the motion complies with 

all Commission Rules.’’ Id. The ID also 

found that ‘‘there are no extraordinary 

circumstances that warrant denying the 

motion’’ and ‘‘there is no evidence 

indicating that terminating this 

investigation based on various 

agreements would be contrary to the 

public interest.’’ Id. at 4, 5. The ID also 

noted that the motion attached 

confidential and public versions of the 

agreements. Id. at 4. No petition for 

review of the ID was filed. 

The Commission has determined not 

to review the subject ID. The 

investigation is terminated in its 

entirety. 

The Commission vote for this 

determination took place on June 9, 

2022. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in Part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR part 

210. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: June 9, 2022. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2022–12794 Filed 6–13–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1273] 

Certain Residential Premises Security 

Monitoring and Automation Panels, 

and Components Thereof; Notice of 

Commission Determination Not To 

Review an Initial Determination of NonInfringement; Termination of the 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

(Order No. 18) of the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) 

granting summary determination of no 

violation based on non-infringement of 

the asserted patent claims. The 

investigation is terminated. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Robert Needham, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–2392. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 

5, 2021, the Commission instituted this 

investigation under section 337 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 

U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section 337’’), based on a 

complaint filed by ADT LLC and the 

ADT Security Corporation, both of Boca 

Raton, Florida, (collectively, ‘‘ADT’’). 86 

FR 42879–80. The complaint, as 

supplemented, alleges a violation of 

section 337 based upon the importation 

into the United States, sale for 

importation, or sale after importation 

into the United States of certain 

residential premises security monitoring 

and automation control panels, and 

components thereof by reason of 

infringement of claims 1 and 12 of U.S. 

Patent No. 8,976,937 (‘‘the ’937 patent’’) 

and claims 1–4, 7–15, and 18–20 of U.S. 

Patent No. 9,286,772 (‘‘the ’772 patent’’). 

Id. at 42880. The complaint also alleges 

the existence of a domestic industry. 

The notice of investigation names as a 

respondent Vivint, Inc., of Provo, Utah 

(‘‘Vivint’’). Id. The Office of Unfair 

Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) is also a 

party to the investigation. 87 FR 476 

(Jan. 5, 2022). 

The Commission subsequently 

terminated the investigation with 

respect to all asserted claims of the ’937 

patent and claims 1, 7–12, and 18–20 of 

the ’772 patent based on withdrawal of 

the complaint as to those claims. Order 

No. 10 (Dec. 17, 2021), unreviewed by 

Notice (Jan. 18, 2022); Order No. 15 

(Mar. 21, 2022), unreviewed by Notice 

(Apr. 12, 2022). Claims 2, 3, and 4 of the 

’772 patent are therefore the only claims 

that remain in the investigation. 

On March 10, 2022, Vivint moved for 

a summary determination pursuant to 

Commission Rule 210.18 (19 CFR 

210.18) of no violation of section 337 

based on invalidity, and alternatively, 

non-infringement. Vivint argued that the 

‘‘processor’’ limitations of the asserted 

claims should be construed to allow 

those limitations to be satisfied by 

multiple processors, and that under that 

construction, all the asserted claims are 

invalid as anticipated by U.S. Patent 

Pub. No. 2010/0102171. Vivint 

alternatively argued that, if the 

‘‘processor’’ limitations of the asserted 

claims are construed to require that a 

single processor must satisfy all of the 

‘‘processor’’ limitations, none of the 

accused products infringe the asserted 

claims because no single processor 

satisfies all the ‘‘processor’’ limitations. 

On March 21, 2022, ADT filed a 

response opposing the motion, arguing 

that the ‘‘processor’’ limitations require 

a single processor, but contending that 

the accused products contained a 

processor that satisfied all the 

limitations. On March 28, OUII filed a 

response in support of the motion, 

arguing that the ‘‘processor’’ limitations 

require at least one processor that 

satisfies all the ‘‘processor’’ limitations 

and that the accused products do not 

infringe because they do not contain a 

processor that satisfies all of the 

‘‘processor’’ limitations. On March 24, 

2022, and March 31, 2022, Vivint filed 

replies to ADT’s and OUII’s responses, 

respectively. 

On April 22, 2022, the ALJ issued the 

subject ID (Order No. 18) pursuant to 

Commission Rules 210.18(b) and 

210.42(c) (19 CFR 210.18(b), 210.42(c)), 

granting in part Vivint’s motion and 

finding summary determination of no 

violation because ADT failed to 

establish that the accused products 

infringe any asserted claim. The ID finds 

that the ‘‘processor’’ limitations require 

at least one processor that satisfies all of 

the ‘‘processor’’ limitations, and that 

ADT failed to show that the accused 

products contain a ‘‘processor’’ that 

satisfies all the ‘‘processor’’ limitations. 

On May 4, 2022, ADT filed a petition 

for review of the ID. Also on May 4, 

2022, Vivint filed a contingent petition 

for review of the ID. On May 9, 2022, 

Vivint responded to ADT’s petition, and 

on May 11, 2022, ADT responded to 

Vivint’s contingent petition for review. 

Also on May 11, 2022, OUII responded 

to both petitions. 

The Commission has determined not 

to review the subject ID. The 

investigation is hereby terminated with 

a finding of no violation. 

The Commission vote for this 

determination took place on June 8, 

2022. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1