alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 29, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 38810]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13829]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice of Intent To Rule on Request To Release Airport Property 
at the Colorado Air and Space Port, Watkins, Colorado

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of request to release airport property.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and invite public comment on the 
release of land at the Colorado Air and Space Port under the provisions 
of Section 125 of the Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment Reform Act 
for the 21st Century (AIR 21).

DATES: Comments are due within 30 days of the date of the publication 
of this notice in the Federal Register. Emailed comments can be 
provided to Mr. Michael Matz, Project Manager/Compliance Specialist, 
Denver Airports District Office, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e08d89838881858cce82ce8d81949aa0868181ce878f96"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b3dedad0dbd2d6df9dd19dded2c7c9f3d5d2d29dd4dcc5">[email protected]</span></a>, (303) 342-
1251.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Mr. Jeff Kloska, Director, Colorado 
Air and Space Port, 5200 Front Range Parkway, Watkins, CO 80137, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9bd1d0f7f4e8f0fadbfafff8f4fcf4edb5f4e9fc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="de9495b2b1adb5bf9ebfbabdb1b9b1a8f0b1acb9">[email protected]</span></a>, (720) 523-7310; or Michael Matz, Project Manager/
Compliance Specialist, Denver Airports District Office, 26805 E. 68th 
Ave. Suite 224, Denver, CO, 80249, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#224f4b414a43474e0c400c4f435658624443430c454d54"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3855515b50595d54165a1655594c42785e5959165f574e">[email protected]</span></a>, (303) 342-
1251. Documents reflecting this FAA action may be reviewed at the above 
locations.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA invites public comment on the 
request to release property at the Colorado Air and Space Port under 
the provisions of the AIR 21 (49 U.S.C. 47107(h)(2)). The proposal 
consists of 53,676 square feet of vacant land located on the Southeast 
side of the airport, shown as Parcel 9F on the Airport Layout Plan. The 
parcel lies at the boundary of airport property, and will be developed 
for commercial use. The FAA concurs that the parcel is no longer needed 
for airport purposes. The proposed use of this property is compatible 
with existing airport operations in accordance with FAA's Policy and 
Procedures Concerning the Use of Airport Revenue, as published in the 
Federal Register on February 16, 1999.

    Issued in Denver, Colorado, on June 23, 2022.
Marc Miller,
Acting Manager, Denver Airports District Office.
[FR Doc. 2022-13829 Filed 6-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 12.1
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                 FOUR M CORPORATION
                                                         RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                                                                 Fiscal Year Ended July 31,
                                            -------------------------------------------------------------------

                                              1996           1995         1994            1993          1992
                                            -------------------------------------------------------------------

<S>                                          <C>          <C>          <C>             <C>           <C>
Interest expense.........................    $ 7,585      $ 5,607      $ 5,448         $ 4,948       $ 5,903
Rent expense.............................      5,041        4,613        4,984           4,997         5,442
One third rent expense...................      1,680        1,538        1,661           1,666         1,814
                                              ------       ------       ------          ------        ------
Fixed charges............................    $ 9,245      $ 7,145      $ 7,109         $ 6,614       $ 7,717
IBT......................................    $ 8,930      $16,457     $(3,802)         $ (382)       $ 1,435
Fixed charges from above.................      9,245        7,145        7,109           6,614         7,717
                                             -------      -------      -------         -------       -------
Earnings, as defined.....................    $18,175      $23,602      $ 3,307         $ 6,232       $ 9,152
Ratio of earnings to fixed
charges..................................        2.0x        3.3x         0.5x             1.0x          1.1x
                                             =======      =======      =======         ========      ========
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q REPORT
OF
REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC.
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(CHAPTER 63, TITLE 18 U.S.C. SS.SS. 1350(a) AND (b))

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350(a) and (b)),
the undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
August 7, 2008

/s/STEVEN J. JANUSEKSteven J. Janusek, Chief Financial Officer


The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350(a)
and (b)), is not a part of the Form 10-Q
to which it refers and is, to the extent permitted by law, provided by the above signatory to the extent of his knowledge.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4902 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Dimyristyl Peroxydicarbonate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2007 

Mr. LAMPSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Dimyristyl 

Peroxydicarbonate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DIMYRISTYL PEROXYDICARBONATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.l.l Dimyristyl 

Peroxydicarbonate (CAS No. 

53220–22–7) (provided for 

in subheading 

2917.19.7050) ..................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4902 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
STATE v. NELSON.

No. COA03-244.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 6, 2004.

Certification Date July 26, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
Independent Auditors' Report


To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Smith Barney Sector Series Inc.:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements
of the Smith Barney Technology Fund of Smith Barney Sector Series
Inc. ("Fund") for the year ended October 31, 2002, we considered
its internal control, including control activities for
safeguarding securities, in order to determine our auditing
procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the
financial statements and to comply with the requirements of Form
N-SAR, not to provide assurance on internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Those controls include the safeguarding of assets against
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, error or
fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any
evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to
the risk that it may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in internal control that might be material
weaknesses under standards established by the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness is a
condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the
internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low
level the risk that errors or fraud in amounts that would be
material in relation to the financial statements being audited
may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees
in the normal course of performing their assigned functions.
However, we noted no matters involving internal control and its
operation, including controls for safeguarding securities that we
consider to be material weaknesses as defined above as of October
31, 2002.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management and the Board of Directors of the Fund and the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not intended to be and
should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.


                                                  KPMG LLP

New York, New York
December 11, 2002
EXHIBIT 32.1


                                   iBIZ, INC.
    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of iBIZ, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth W. Schilling,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to iBIZ, Inc. and will be retained by iBIZ, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date:  June 21, 2004

/s/ Kenneth W. Schilling
--------------------------
Kenneth W. Schilling
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2187/2004

of 20 December 2004         

amending Regulation (EC) No 1615/2000 derogating from Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 in respect of the definition of the concept of originating products used for the purposes of the scheme of generalised preferences to take account of the special situation of Nepal regarding certain exports of textiles to the Community

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (1), and in particular Article 247 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code (2), and in particular Article 76 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EC) No 1615/2000 is amended as follows:

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from 1 January 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 December 2004.

For the Commission

László KOVÁCS            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 302, 19.10.1992, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by the 2003 Act of Accession.

(2)OJ L 253, 11.10.1993, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2286/2003 (OJ L 343, 31.12.2003, p. 1).

(3)OJ L 346, 31.12.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1828/2004 (OJ L 321, 22.10.2004, p. 23).

(4)OJ L 185, 25.7.2000, p. 46.

(5)OJ L 46, 16.2.2002, p. 14.

(6)OJ L 332, 19.12.2003, p. 1.

(7)  COM(2003) 787 final.

(8)  COM(2004) 461 final.

----
In the Matter of J.D., Minor Child. Appealed by Buncombe County Department of Social Services.

No. 240P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 12, 2004.

Charlotte A. Wade, for Buncombe County DSS.

Diane K. McDonald, Asheville, for Mother.

Judy Randolph, Asheville, for Guardian ad Litem.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 19th day of May 2004 by Petitioner (Buncombe County DSS) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th day of August 2004."
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4770 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4770

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on combination single slot 
                       toaster and toaster ovens.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 17, 2007

Mr. Scott of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on combination single slot 
                       toaster and toaster ovens.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMBINATION SINGLE SLOT TOASTER AND TOASTER OVENS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.40 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CHARLES PATRICK WELDON.

No. COA04-3

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed July 6, 2004

This case not for publication

Wake County Nos. 02 CRS 790-791, 02 CRS 69525.

*Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General Daniel P. O'Brien, for the State.*

*Michael J. Reece for defendant-appellant.*

STEELMAN, Judge.

Defendant was convicted of possession with intent to sell or deliver cocaine, felony possession of cocaine, and was found to be an habitual felon. The possession with intent to sell or deliver charge and the possession charge were consolidated for purposes of judgment. Defendant was sentenced to 100 to 129 months imprisonment. Defendant appeals.

Counsel appointed to represent defendant has been unable to identify any issue with sufficient merit to support a meaningful argument for relief on appeal and asks that this Court conduct its own review of the record for possible prejudicial error. Counsel has also shown to the satisfaction of this Court that he hascomplied with the requirements of *Anders v. California,* 386 U.S. 738, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967), and *State v. Kinch,* 314 N.C. 99, 331 S.E.2d 665 (1985), by advising defendant of his right to file written arguments with this Court and providing him with the documents necessary for him to do so.

Defendant has not filed any written arguments on his own behalf with this Court and a reasonable time in which he could have done so has passed. In accordance with *Anders,* we have fully examined the record to determine whether any issues of arguable merit appear therefrom. We have been unable to find any possible prejudicial error and conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous.

NO ERROR.

Judges HUDSON and THORNBURG concur.

Report per Rule 30(e).
| 1. | Such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30,      2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the      period ending September 30, 2006, fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Modena 6,      Inc. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: October      1, 2006                                  |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                        |
| /s/      Jacque Bryon Oliphant                              |
| Jacque      Bryon OliphantPresident,      CEO, CFO Director |
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4796 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4796

   To extend the suspension of duty on formulations of Thiamethoxam, 
              Difenoconazole, Fludioxonil, and Mefenoxam.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 18, 2007

  Mr. Coble introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the suspension of duty on formulations of Thiamethoxam, 
              Difenoconazole, Fludioxonil, and Mefenoxam.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FORMULATIONS OF THIAMETHOXAM, DIFENOCONAZOLE, FLUDIOXONIL, 
              AND MEFENOXAM.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.13.31 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to formulations of 
Thiamethoxam, Difenoconazole, Fludioxonil, and Mefenoxam) is amended by 
striking ``12/31/2009'' and by inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1143 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to require the Bureau of Prisons 

to provide secure storage areas on institution grounds outside the secure 

perimeter for employees authorized to carry a firearm. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2013 

Mr. STOCKMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to require the Bureau of Prisons to provide secure storage areas on institution grounds outside the secure perimeter for employees authorized to carry a firearm. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Correctional 

5 Workers Safety Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 (1) The Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act, 

8 enacted in 2004 and later amended by the Law EnVerDate Mar 15 2010 21:09 Mar 18, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1143.IH H1143

srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1143 IH

1 forcement Officers Safety Act Improvements Act of 

2 2010, gives law enforcement officers, including Bu3 reau of Prisons (BOP) employees, the right to carry 

4 a concealed firearm in all fifty States for self-protec5 tion. 

6 (2) The intent of the law is to allow law en7 forcement officers to protect themselves while off 

8 duty. 

9 (3) Correctional workers in the BOP have been 

10 the targets of assaults and murders while off duty. 

11 (4) While this law allows officers to protect 

12 themselves off duty, the BOP does not allow staff to 

13 carry their personal weapon on the grounds of most 

14 facilities when commuting to and from work. 

15 (5) The BOP allows carry to and from work 

16 and storage at approximately 15 facilities in the 

17 BOP, but they do not reasonably explain why they 

18 allow some BOP staff to carry on BOP property 

19 while others are not allowed. 

20 SEC. 3. SECURE FIREARMS STORAGE IN PRISON. 

21 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 303 of title 18, United 

22 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol23 lowing: 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 1143 IH

1 ‘‘§ 4049. Secure firearms storage in prison 

2 ‘‘The Director of the Bureau of Prisons shall ensure 

3 that each prison facility provides a secure firearms storage 

4 area for use by all persons employed by the Bureau at 

5 the facility who are authorized to carry a firearm, or allow 

6 employees authorized to carry a firearm to store their fire7 arm in a Bureau-approved vehicle lockbox.’’. 

8 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

9 at the beginning of chapter 303 of title 18, United States 

10 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘4049. Secure firearms storage in prison.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS