alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ KILOPASS TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

SIDENSE CORPORATION, Defendant

- Appellee.

____________________

2013

- 1009

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 10

- CV

- 2066, Judge Susan Y. Illston

.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

M ARK L. H OGGE , SNR Denton US, LLP, of Washin gton, DC, argued for plaintiff

- appellant. With him on the brief were S HAILENDRA K. M AHESHWARI , R ACHEL R EPKA , K HALIQ A. I MRAN and A NDREW B LAIR . Of counsel was J AMES A. K LENK

.

R OGER L. C OOK , Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for defendant

appellee. With him on the brief were R OBERT D. T ADLOCK and S ARA B. G IARDINA . Of counsel was J OSHUA H AMILTON L EE , of Atlanta, Georgia.

______________________T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (R ADER , Chief Judge, L OURIE , and O' MALLEY , Circuit Judges. ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

April 10, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly C lerk
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4822 

To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on Carfentrazone. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 18, 2007 

Mr. LAHOOD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty 

on Carfentrazone. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CARFENTRAZONE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.01.54 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Carfentrazone) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘(provided for in subheading 

8 2933.99.22)’’ and inserting ‘‘(provided for in sub9 heading 2933.99.22) and any formulations con10 taining such compound (provided for in subheading 

11 3808.93.15)’’; and 


HMOORE on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HR 4822 IH

1 (2) in the effective period column, by striking 

2 the date contained therein and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

3 2011’’. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

5 subsection (a) apply to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

6 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

7 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


HMOORE on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
# Official Journal L 39/2013

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.039.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 39 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 569 February 2013 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.039.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 39

English edition

Legislation

Volume 569 February 2013

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) No 98/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2013 on the marketing and use of explosives precursors (1) | 1 |
| | * | Regulation (EU) No 99/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2013 on the European statistical programme 2013-17 (2) | 12 |
| | * | Regulation (EU) No 100/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002 establishing a European Maritime Safety Agency (1) | 30 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) No 98/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2013 on the marketing and use of explosives precursors (1)

1

*

Regulation (EU) No 99/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2013 on the European statistical programme 2013-17 (2)

12

*

Regulation (EU) No 100/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002 establishing a European Maritime Safety Agency (1)

30

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |
| | (2)   Text with relevance for the EEA and for Switzerland |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

(2)   Text with relevance for the EEA and for Switzerland

2

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Greg Steven ELOFSON, Petitioner v. Stephanie BIVENS, et al.

No. 19-570

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
CTY. OF CABARRUS, et al. v. TOLSON.

No. 329P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 12, 2004.

R. Daniel Boyce, Philip R. Isley, for County of Cabarrus et al.

Grayson G. Kelly, Senior Deputy Attorney General, John F. Maddrey, Norma S. Harrell, Special Deputy Attorney Generals, for the State.

*529The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 12th day of July 2004 by Plaintiffs To Deem Petition for Discretionary Review Timely Filed:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 12th day of August 2004."
EXHIBIT 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**     I, Travis E. Baugh, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of MicroMed Cardiovascular, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;     4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and          (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and     5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.          Date: November 14, 2005         By:                                                    /s/ Travis E. Baugh    Travis E. Baugh    President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4875 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Solvent Violet 11. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2007 

Mr. CLAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Solvent Violet 11. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SOLVENT VIOLET 11. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.l.l Solvent Violet 11 (CAS No. 

128–95–0) (provided for in 

subheading 3204.11.25) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4875 IH

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
COMMON SENSE TRUST

Certificate of Amendment of the
Agreement and Declaration of Trust
of
Common Sense  Trust

	The undersigned, being the Assistant Secretary of Common Sense 
Trust  (hereinafter referred to as the "Trust"), a trust with 
transferable shares of the type commonly called a Massachusetts 
business trust, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that, pursuant to the authority 
conferred upon the Trustees of the Trust by Section 9.3 of the 
Agreement and Declaration of Trust, dated January 29, 1987 (the 
"Original Declaration", and as amended October 26, 1987, April 8, 
1998, February 24, 1992, January 24, 1994, February 2, 1994, January 
27, 1995, May 17, 1996 and October 16, 1996, the "Existing 
Declaration", and as further amended hereby, the "Declaration"), and 
by the affirmative vote of a Majority of the Trustees at a special 
telephone meeting duly called and held on October 14, 1997, the 
Existing Declaration is amended as follows:

1. The provisions of Section 1.1 of the Existing Declaration 
are hereby amended to reflect that the name of the Trust is 
being changed to Concert Investment Series and any and all 
references to the Trust throughout the Existing Declaration 
shall be so amended.

2. The provisions of Section 6.2 of the Existing Declaration, 
as they apply to the Common Sense  Growth Fund, the Common 
Sense  growth and Income Fund and the Common Sense  
Government Fund (each a "Fund", and collectively, the 
"Funds"), which were established as separate portfolios of 
the Trust by the Original Declaration (but not as to any 
other portfolio of the Trust), are hereby amended in the 
following respects:

(a) The name of the Common Sense  Growth fun shall be 
changed to the Growth Fund.
(b) The name of the Common Sense  Growth and Income Fund 
shall be changed to the Growth and Income Fund.
(c) The name of the Common Sense (r) Government Fund shall 
be changed to the Government Fund.

3. The Trustees further direct that, upon the execution of 
this Certificate of Amendment, the Trust take all necessary 
action to file a copy hereof with the Secretary of State of 
the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and at any other place 
required by law or by the Existing Declaration.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set her hand and the seal 
of the Trust, this 30th day of December, 1997.




Nicholas Dalmaso, Assistant Secretary
[TRUST SEAL]
Richard Knider JACKSON, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6930

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 21, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-30345

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

RASHAD DARNELL SMITH,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

No. 1:04-CR-10001-3

Before SMITH, STEWART, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

January 30, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-30345

2

Rashad Smith, federal prisoner # 22424-009, challenges his sentence. He

previously moved to vacate, set aside, or correct the sentence under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255. The district court dismissed that motion with prejudice, and Smith did

not seek a certificate of appealability. He then filed a motion for writ of coram

nobis in the district court challenging the calculation of his sentence under the

sentencing guidelines and claiming ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The

district court denied the motion on the merits.

Because the writ of coram nobis is not available while Smith is in custody,

see United States v. Castro, 26 F.3d 557, 559 (5th Cir. 1994), his pro se motion

should have been treated as a motion under § 2255. Before filing a successive

motion pursuant to § 2255, Smith was required to obtain leave from this court.

28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). This requirement “acts as a jurisdictional bar to the

district court’s asserting jurisdiction over any successive habeas petition until

this court has granted the petitioner permission to file one.” United States v.

Key, 205 F.3d 773, 774 (5th Cir. 2000). 

We must satisfy ourselves of our own jurisdiction and that of the district

court. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env’t, 523 U.S. 83, 95 (1998). Because

the district court lacked jurisdiction to rule on Smith’s motion, our jurisdiction

extends not to the merits of the appeal, but merely for the purpose of correcting

the jurisdictional error. See New York Life Ins. Co. v. Deshotel, 142 F.3d 873,

883 (5th Cir. 1998). Accordingly, we VACATE the judgment and DISMISS the

appeal for want of jurisdiction.
CERTIFICATE
                              
      The  undersigned, Controller of CONSULTING GROUP
CAPITAL MARKETS FUNDS  (the "Fund"), hereby certifies that
the Fund has received  full payment, in  accordance  with
the provisions of its Prospectus, for 1,170,498,698 shares
of  beneficial interest,  par  value $0.001 per share, the
sales  of  which are reported in the Fund's Rule 24f-2
Notice covering the fiscal year ended  August  31, 1997 and
that the facts otherwise stated in such Notice are true.


                                   Thomas M. Reynolds
                                   Controller

Dated:         October 7, 1997
# Official Journal C 69A/23 F

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 69A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5923 February 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 69A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5923 February 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 069A/1 | Publication of a vacancy for the Executive Director of Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking (Clean Sky 2 JU), Brussels (Temporary Agent Grade AD 14) — COM/2016/20013 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2016/C 069A/1

Publication of a vacancy for the Executive Director of Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking (Clean Sky 2 JU), Brussels (Temporary Agent Grade AD 14) — COM/2016/20013

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1512 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1512

    To prohibit the further extension or establishment of national 
  monuments in New Mexico except by express authorization of Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 11, 2013

  Mr. Pearce introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit the further extension or establishment of national 
  monuments in New Mexico except by express authorization of Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``New Mexico Land Sovereignty Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON FURTHER EXTENSION OR ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL 
              MONUMENTS IN NEW MEXICO.

    This proviso of the last sentence of the first section of the Act 
of September 14, 1950 (64 Stat. 849, chapter 950; 16 U.S.C. 431a), is 
amended by inserting ``or New Mexico'' after ``Wyoming''.
                                 <all>
```
In the MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF Michael William KWASNIK

No. D-3036

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Disbarment order entered.
EXHIBIT 32

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         The undersigned, John M. Sharpe, Jr., hereby certifies as follows:

         1. I am the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of
Inner Systems, Inc. (the "Company").

         2. To the best of my knowledge, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the "Report") complies in all
material respects with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

         3. To the best of my knowledge based upon a review of the Report, the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period
audited.


     SIGNATURE                        TITLE                          DATE


/s/ John M. Sharpe, Jr.     President, Chief Executive           May 21, 2007
-----------------------     Officer and Chief Financial
JOHN M. SHARPE, JR.         Officer
ALEXANDER v. WAL-MART, et al.

No. 588A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 29, 2004.

Nicole D. Wray, for John Alexander.

Zachary C. Bolen, Raleigh, for Wal-Mart, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd day of December 2004 for Extension of Time to File Amicus Brief:

> "Motion Allowed. Amicus (North Carolina Academy of Trial Lawyers) shall have up to and including the 1st day of February 2005 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 29th day of December 2004."
STATE of North Carolina v. Billy Joe PENLAND.

No. 243P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 12, 2004.

Billy Joe Penland, Pro Se.

Lori A. Kroll, Assistant Attorney General, C. Ricky Bowman, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 14th day of May 2004 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th day of August 2004."
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1405 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1405

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to require the Secretary of 
 Veterans Affairs to include an appeals form in any notice of decision 
               issued for the denial of a benefit sought.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 2013

 Ms. Titus (for herself and Mr. Runyan) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to require the Secretary of 
 Veterans Affairs to include an appeals form in any notice of decision 
               issued for the denial of a benefit sought.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCLUSION OF APPEALS FORMS IN NOTICES OF DECISIONS OF 
              BENEFITS DENIALS ISSUED BY THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS 
              AFFAIRS.

    (a) In General.--Section 5104(b) of title 38, United States Code, 
is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and (2)'' and inserting ``(2)''; and
            (2) by inserting before the period at the end the 
        following: ``, and (3) a form that may be used to file an 
        appeal of the decision''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to decisions made by the Secretary under section 511 
of title 38, United States Code, on or after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```