# Official Journal C 281/18 N

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 281 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4718 November 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 281

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4718 November 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 281/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2004/C 281/2 | Re-notification of a previously notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3561 — DEUTSCHE TELEKOM/EUROTEL) — Council regulation (EC) No 139/2004 | 2 |
| | European Central Bank |
| 2004/C 281/3 | Agreement of 16 September 2004 between the European Central Bank and the national central banks of the Member States outside the euro area amending the Agreement of 1 September 1998 laying down the operating procedures for an exchange rate mechanism in stage three of Economic and Monetary Union | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 281/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2004/C 281/2

Re-notification of a previously notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3561 — DEUTSCHE TELEKOM/EUROTEL) — Council regulation (EC) No 139/2004

2

European Central Bank

2004/C 281/3

Agreement of 16 September 2004 between the European Central Bank and the national central banks of the Member States outside the euro area amending the Agreement of 1 September 1998 laying down the operating procedures for an exchange rate mechanism in stage three of Economic and Monetary Union

3

| | II   Preparatory Acts pursuant to Title VI of the Treaty on European Union |
| --- | --- |
| 2004/C 281/4 | Initiative of the Kingdom of Sweden with a view to adopting a Framework Decision on simplifying the exchange of information and intelligence between law enforcement authorities of the Member States of the European Union, in particular as regards serious offences including terrorist acts | 5 |

II   Preparatory Acts pursuant to Title VI of the Treaty on European Union

2004/C 281/4

Initiative of the Kingdom of Sweden with a view to adopting a Framework Decision on simplifying the exchange of information and intelligence between law enforcement authorities of the Member States of the European Union, in particular as regards serious offences including terrorist acts

5

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

I Information

Commission

| 18.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

17 November 2004

(2004/C 281/01)

1 euro=

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3026 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,97 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4329 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,70135 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,971 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5203 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 86,83 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1265 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5777 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,328 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 244,60 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6811 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4323 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2577 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 39 900 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,79 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,443 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 893 100 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6709 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5506 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1257 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8446 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1458 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 405,51 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,7866 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3026

JPY

Japanese yen

135,97

DKK

Danish krone

7,4329

GBP

Pound sterling

0,70135

SEK

Swedish krona

8,971

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5203

ISK

Iceland króna

86,83

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1265

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5777

CZK

Czech koruna

31,328

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

244,60

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6811

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4323

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2577

ROL

Romanian leu

39 900

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,79

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,443

TRL

Turkish lira

1 893 100

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6709

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5506

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1257

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8446

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1458

KRW

South Korean won

1 405,51

ZAR

South African rand

7,7866

---

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---

| 18.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/2

---

Re-notification of a previously notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3561 — DEUTSCHE TELEKOM/EUROTEL)

COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004

(2004/C 281/02)

| 1. | On 27 September 2004, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of a Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Slovak Telecom a.s. (‘Slovak Telecom’, Slovakia), controlled by Deutsche Telekom (‘DT’, Germany), acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking EuroTel Bratislava a.s. (‘EuroTel’, Slovakia), currently a joint venture controlled by Slovak Telecom and Atlantic West, in turn a joint venture between Verizon (USA) and AT&T (USA), by way of purchase of shares. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 27 September 2004, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of a Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Slovak Telecom a.s. (‘Slovak Telecom’, Slovakia), controlled by Deutsche Telekom (‘DT’, Germany), acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking EuroTel Bratislava a.s. (‘EuroTel’, Slovakia), currently a joint venture controlled by Slovak Telecom and Atlantic West, in turn a joint venture between Verizon (USA) and AT&T (USA), by way of purchase of shares.

| 2. | This notification has been declared incomplete on 28.10.2004. The undertakings concerned have now provided the further information required. The notification became complete within the meaning of Article 10(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 on 10.11.2004. Accordingly, the notification became effective on 11.11.2004. |
| --- | --- |

2.

This notification has been declared incomplete on 28.10.2004. The undertakings concerned have now provided the further information required. The notification became complete within the meaning of Article 10(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 on 10.11.2004. Accordingly, the notification became effective on 11.11.2004.

| 3. | The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
  Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (fax No (32-2) 296 43 01 or No (32-2) 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M. 3561 — Deutsche Telekom/EuroTel, to the following address:





  Commission of the European Communities |
| --- | --- |
| Competition DG |
| Merger Registry |
| Rue Joseph II/Jozef II-straat 70 |
| B-1000 Bruxelles/Brussel |

3.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (fax No (32-2) 296 43 01 or No (32-2) 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M. 3561 — Deutsche Telekom/EuroTel, to the following address:

Commission of the European Communities

Competition DG

Merger Registry

Rue Joseph II/Jozef II-straat 70

B-1000 Bruxelles/Brussel

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---

European Central Bank

| 18.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/3

---

AGREEMENT

of 16 September 2004

between the European Central Bank and the national central banks of the Member States outside the euro area amending the Agreement of 1 September 1998 laying down the operating procedures for an exchange rate mechanism in stage three of Economic and Monetary Union

(2004/C 281/03)

THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK (ECB) AND THE NATIONAL CENTRAL BANKS OF THE MEMBER STATES THAT ARE OUTSIDE THE EURO AREA (HEREINAFTER THE ‘NON-EURO AREA NCBs’),

Whereas:

| (1) | The European Council in its Resolution of 16 June 1997 (1) (hereinafter the Resolution) agreed to set up an exchange rate mechanism (hereinafter ERM II) when the third stage of economic and monetary union began on 1 January 1999. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The European Council in its Resolution of 16 June 1997 (1) (hereinafter the Resolution) agreed to set up an exchange rate mechanism (hereinafter ERM II) when the third stage of economic and monetary union began on 1 January 1999.

| (2) | Under the Resolution, ERM II is designed to help to ensure that non-euro area Member States participating in ERM II orient their policies to stability, foster convergence and thereby help them in their efforts to adopt the euro. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Under the Resolution, ERM II is designed to help to ensure that non-euro area Member States participating in ERM II orient their policies to stability, foster convergence and thereby help them in their efforts to adopt the euro.

| (3) | The Agreement of 1 September 1998 between the European Central Bank and the national central banks of the Member States outside the euro area laying down the operating procedures for an exchange rate mechanism in stage three of Economic and Monetary Union (2) (hereinafter the Central Bank Agreement) lays down the operating procedures for ERM II. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Agreement of 1 September 1998 between the European Central Bank and the national central banks of the Member States outside the euro area laying down the operating procedures for an exchange rate mechanism in stage three of Economic and Monetary Union (2) (hereinafter the Central Bank Agreement) lays down the operating procedures for ERM II.

| (4) | It is necessary to replace Article 5 of the Central Bank Agreement by a new provision in order to take into account the increased international role of the euro as one of the major reserve currencies, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

It is necessary to replace Article 5 of the Central Bank Agreement by a new provision in order to take into account the increased international role of the euro as one of the major reserve currencies,

HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Amendment to Article 5 of the Central Bank Agreement

Article 5 of the Central Bank Agreement is replaced by the following:

‘Procedures for intervention and other transactions

5.1   Prior agreement of the non-euro area NCB issuing the intervention currency shall be obtained when another central bank of the European System of Central Banks intends to use the former's currency in amounts exceeding mutually agreed limits in connection with all non-compulsory intervention, including unilateral intramarginal intervention.

5.2   A non-euro area NCB shall give immediate notification to the ECB when it has used the euro in amounts exceeding mutually agreed limits in connection with all non-compulsory intervention, including unilateral intramarginal intervention.

5.3   Before carrying out transactions other than intervention which involve at least one non-euro area currency or the euro and which exceed mutually agreed limits, the party intending to carry out such transactions shall give prior notification to the central bank(s) concerned. In such cases the central banks concerned shall agree on an approach which minimises potential problems, including the possibility of settling the transaction, wholly or in part, directly between the two central banks.’

Article 2

Final provisions

1.   This Agreement shall enter into force on 1 October 2004.

2.   This Agreement shall be drawn up in English, French and German and duly signed by the parties. The ECB, which is required to retain the original Agreements, shall send a certified copy of each of the original Agreements in English, French and German to each euro area and non-euro area NCB.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 16 September 2004.

For and on behalf of

The European Central Bank

For and on behalf of

Česká národní banka

For and on behalf of

Danmarks Nationalbank

For and on behalf of

Eesti Pank

For and on behalf of

Central Bank of Cyprus

For and on behalf of

Latvijas Banka

For and on behalf of

Lietuvos bankas

For and on behalf of

Magyar Nemzeti Bank

For and on behalf of

Central Bank of Malta

For and on behalf of

Narodowy Bank Polski

For and on behalf of

Banka Slovenije

For and on behalf of

Národná banka Slovenska

For and on behalf of

Sveriges Riksbank

For and on behalf of

The Bank of England

---

(1)  OJ C 236, 2.8.1997, p. 5.

1

(2)  OJ C 345, 13.11.1998, p. 6. Agreement as last amended by the Agreement of 29 April 2004 (OJ C 135, 13.5.2004, p. 3).

2

---

II Preparatory Acts pursuant to Title VI of the Treaty on European Union

| 18.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/5

---

Initiative of the Kingdom of Sweden with a view to adopting a Framework Decision on simplifying the exchange of information and intelligence between law enforcement authorities of the Member States of the European Union, in particular as regards serious offences including terrorist acts

(2004/C 281/04)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 30(1)(a) and (b) and 34(2) (b) thereof,

Having regard to the initiative of the Kingdom of Sweden,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament,

Whereas:

| (1) | One of the Union's core objectives is to provide its citizens with a high level of security within an area of freedom, security and justice. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

One of the Union's core objectives is to provide its citizens with a high level of security within an area of freedom, security and justice.

| (2) | That objective is to be achieved by preventing and combating crime through closer co- operation between law enforcement authorities in the Member States, while respecting the principles and rules relating to human rights, fundamental freedoms and the rule of law on which the Union is founded and which are common to the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

That objective is to be achieved by preventing and combating crime through closer co- operation between law enforcement authorities in the Member States, while respecting the principles and rules relating to human rights, fundamental freedoms and the rule of law on which the Union is founded and which are common to the Member States.

| (3) | Exchange of information and intelligence on crime and criminal activities is the basis for law enforcement cooperation in the Union serving the overall objective of improving the safety of the Union's citizens. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Exchange of information and intelligence on crime and criminal activities is the basis for law enforcement cooperation in the Union serving the overall objective of improving the safety of the Union's citizens.

| (4) | The timely access to accurate and up-to-date information and intelligence is a crucial element for the possibility of law enforcement authorities to successfully detect, prevent and investigate crime or criminal activity, in particular within an area where internal border controls have been abolished. As terrorists and other serious criminals' activities are carried out clandestinely, they need to be controlled, and information relating to suspected terrorists needs to be exchanged in a particularly rapid manner. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The timely access to accurate and up-to-date information and intelligence is a crucial element for the possibility of law enforcement authorities to successfully detect, prevent and investigate crime or criminal activity, in particular within an area where internal border controls have been abolished. As terrorists and other serious criminals' activities are carried out clandestinely, they need to be controlled, and information relating to suspected terrorists needs to be exchanged in a particularly rapid manner.

| (5) | It is important that the possibilities for law enforcement authorities to obtain information and intelligence concerning serious crime and terrorist acts from other Member States be viewed horizontally and not in terms of differences with regard to types of crime or division of competencies between law enforcement or judicial authorities. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

It is important that the possibilities for law enforcement authorities to obtain information and intelligence concerning serious crime and terrorist acts from other Member States be viewed horizontally and not in terms of differences with regard to types of crime or division of competencies between law enforcement or judicial authorities.

| (6) | Currently, effective and expeditious exchange of information and intelligence between law enforcement authorities is seriously hampered by formal procedures, administrative structures and legal obstacles laid down in Member States' legislation; such a state of affairs is unacceptable to the citizens of the European Union which calls for greater security and more efficient law enforcement while protecting human rights. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

Currently, effective and expeditious exchange of information and intelligence between law enforcement authorities is seriously hampered by formal procedures, administrative structures and legal obstacles laid down in Member States' legislation; such a state of affairs is unacceptable to the citizens of the European Union which calls for greater security and more efficient law enforcement while protecting human rights.

| (7) | It is necessary for law enforcement authorities to be able to request and obtain information and intelligence from other Member States at different stages of investigation, from a phase of criminal intelligence gathering to a phase of criminal investigation. The Member State's systems are different in that respect, but this Framework Decision does not purport to change these systems. However, it intends, as regards certain types of information and intelligence, to ensure that certain information vital for law enforcement authorities is exchanged in a rapid manner within the Union, so as not to hamper investigations into serious crime and terrorism acts. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

It is necessary for law enforcement authorities to be able to request and obtain information and intelligence from other Member States at different stages of investigation, from a phase of criminal intelligence gathering to a phase of criminal investigation. The Member State's systems are different in that respect, but this Framework Decision does not purport to change these systems. However, it intends, as regards certain types of information and intelligence, to ensure that certain information vital for law enforcement authorities is exchanged in a rapid manner within the Union, so as not to hamper investigations into serious crime and terrorism acts.

| (8) | The absence of a common legal framework for the effective and expeditious exchange of information and intelligence between the law enforcement authorities of the Member States is a deficiency that will have to be remedied; the Council therefore deems it necessary to adopt a legally binding instrument on simplifying the exchange of information and intelligence. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

The absence of a common legal framework for the effective and expeditious exchange of information and intelligence between the law enforcement authorities of the Member States is a deficiency that will have to be remedied; the Council therefore deems it necessary to adopt a legally binding instrument on simplifying the exchange of information and intelligence.

| (9) | The Member States' common interest to fight crime of a cross-border nature must strike the appropriate balance between a fast and efficient law enforcement co-operation and agreed principles and rules on data protection, fundamental freedoms, human rights and individual liberties; the present text achieves that balance. |
| --- | --- |

(9)

The Member States' common interest to fight crime of a cross-border nature must strike the appropriate balance between a fast and efficient law enforcement co-operation and agreed principles and rules on data protection, fundamental freedoms, human rights and individual liberties; the present text achieves that balance.

| (10) | In the declaration on combating terrorism as adopted by the European Council at its meeting on 25 March 2004, the European Council instructs the Council to examine measures regarding simplifying the exchange of information and intelligence between law enforcement authorities of the Member States. The present Framework Decision fulfils that instruction. |
| --- | --- |

(10)

In the declaration on combating terrorism as adopted by the European Council at its meeting on 25 March 2004, the European Council instructs the Council to examine measures regarding simplifying the exchange of information and intelligence between law enforcement authorities of the Member States. The present Framework Decision fulfils that instruction.

| (11) | As regards Iceland and Norway, this Framework Decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis which falls within the area referred to in Article 1 of Council Decision 1999/437/EC of 17 May 1999 on certain arrangements for the application of the Agreement concluded by the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the association of those two States with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis (1). The procedures set out in that Agreement have been followed in respect of this Framework Decision. |
| --- | --- |

(11)

As regards Iceland and Norway, this Framework Decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis which falls within the area referred to in Article 1 of Council Decision 1999/437/EC of 17 May 1999 on certain arrangements for the application of the Agreement concluded by the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the association of those two States with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis (1). The procedures set out in that Agreement have been followed in respect of this Framework Decision.

| (12) | The personal data processed in the context of the implementation of this Framework Decision will be protected in accordance with the principles of the Council of Europe Convention of 28 January 1981 for the protection of individuals with regards to the automatic processing of personal data. |
| --- | --- |

(12)

The personal data processed in the context of the implementation of this Framework Decision will be protected in accordance with the principles of the Council of Europe Convention of 28 January 1981 for the protection of individuals with regards to the automatic processing of personal data.

| (13) | This Framework Decision respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union and reflected by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, |
| --- | --- |

(13)

This Framework Decision respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union and reflected by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,

HAS ADOPTED THE PRESENT DECISION:

TITLE I

SCOPE AND DEFINITIONS

Article 1

Objective and scope

1.   The purpose of this Framework Decision is to establish the rules under which Member States' law enforcement authorities effectively and expeditiously can exchange existing information and intelligence for the purpose of conducting crime investigations or crime intelligence operations and in particular as regards serious offences, including terrorist acts. It shall not affect more favourable provisions in national law, bilateral or multilateral agreements or arrangements between the Member States or between Member States and third countries and shall be without prejudice to instruments of the European Union on mutual legal assistance or mutual recognition of decisions regarding criminal matters.

2.   This Framework decision does not imply any obligation on the part of the Member States to gather and store information and intelligence only for the purpose of providing it to the competent law enforcement authorities of other Member States.

3.   This Framework Decision does not imply any obligation on the part of the Member States to provide information and intelligence to be used before a judicial authority as evidence, nor does it give any right to use such information or intelligence for that purpose. Where a Member State has obtained information or intelligence in accordance with this Framework Decision, and wants to use it as evidence in a criminal proceeding, it has to obtain consent from the Member State that provided the information or intelligence, where necessary through use of instruments regarding judicial cooperation in force between the Member States.

4.   This Framework Decision does not imply any obligation to obtain information or intelligence by means of coercive measures in the State receiving the request for information or intelligence.

Article 2

Definitions

For the purposes of this Framework Decision:

| (a) | ‘competent law enforcement authority’: a national police, customs or other authority, that is authorised by national law to detect, prevent or investigate offences or criminal activities and to exercise authority and take coercive measures in the context of such activities. A judicial authority is regarded as competent law enforcement authority if the information or intelligence, according to national law, is only held by or accessible to that judicial authority; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

‘competent law enforcement authority’: a national police, customs or other authority, that is authorised by national law to detect, prevent or investigate offences or criminal activities and to exercise authority and take coercive measures in the context of such activities. A judicial authority is regarded as competent law enforcement authority if the information or intelligence, according to national law, is only held by or accessible to that judicial authority;

| (b) | ‘crime investigation’: a legal framework within which measures are taken by competent law enforcement or judicial authorities, including public prosecutors, with a view to establishing and identifying facts, suspects and circumstances regarding one or several identified concrete criminal acts; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

‘crime investigation’: a legal framework within which measures are taken by competent law enforcement or judicial authorities, including public prosecutors, with a view to establishing and identifying facts, suspects and circumstances regarding one or several identified concrete criminal acts;

| (c) | ‘criminal intelligence operation’: a legal framework, having not yet reached the stage of a criminal investigation supervised and controlled by judicial authorities including public prosecutors, within which a competent law enforcement authority is entitled by national law to collect, process and analyse information about crime or criminal activities with the view to establishing if concrete criminal acts has been or may be committed; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

‘criminal intelligence operation’: a legal framework, having not yet reached the stage of a criminal investigation supervised and controlled by judicial authorities including public prosecutors, within which a competent law enforcement authority is entitled by national law to collect, process and analyse information about crime or criminal activities with the view to establishing if concrete criminal acts has been or may be committed;

| (d) | ‘information and intelligence’; any type of existing information or data; appraised, processed and analysed or not, that could be used in a crime investigation or a criminal intelligence operation to detect, prevent or investigate a crime or a criminal activity. Such information or intelligence includes:






  (i) | information and intelligence in records or files kept by competent law enforcement authorities, |
| --- | --- | --- |

(d)

‘information and intelligence’; any type of existing information or data; appraised, processed and analysed or not, that could be used in a crime investigation or a criminal intelligence operation to detect, prevent or investigate a crime or a criminal activity. Such information or intelligence includes:

(i)

information and intelligence in records or files kept by competent law enforcement authorities,

| (ii) | information kept in records or files by other authorities, to which competent law enforcement authorities have access, either directly or indirectly, |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

information kept in records or files by other authorities, to which competent law enforcement authorities have access, either directly or indirectly,

| (iii) | information on holders, ex-directory and listed respectively, of telephone, cell-phone, telex, fax, e-mail or web-site subscriptions or addresses kept by telecom operators, |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

information on holders, ex-directory and listed respectively, of telephone, cell-phone, telex, fax, e-mail or web-site subscriptions or addresses kept by telecom operators,

| (iv) | information on persons and freight kept by transport companies, |
| --- | --- |

(iv)

information on persons and freight kept by transport companies,

| (v) | any other information or intelligence or data; appraised, processed and analysed or not, that has been obtained within the framework of a criminal investigation or a criminal intelligence operation or that may be obtained without the use of coercive powers. |
| --- | --- |

(v)

any other information or intelligence or data; appraised, processed and analysed or not, that has been obtained within the framework of a criminal investigation or a criminal intelligence operation or that may be obtained without the use of coercive powers.

Article 3

Offences

Exchange of information and intelligence under this Framework Decision may take place concerning offences punishable by the law of the requesting Member State by a custodial sentence or a detention order for a maximum period of at least 12 months. Member States may agree on a bilateral basis to make the procedures applicable under this Framework Decision applicable on a broader basis.

TITLE II

EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION AND INTELLIGENCE

Article 4

Provision of information and intelligence

1.   Member States shall ensure that information and intelligence, held by or accessible without the use of coercive means to competent law enforcement agencies, can be provided to the competent law enforcement authorities of other Member States in accordance with this Framework Decision.

2.   Member States shall ensure that conditions not stricter than those applicable at national level for providing and requesting information and intelligence are applied for providing information and intelligence to competent law enforcement authorities of other Member States.

3.   Information and intelligence shall be provided on request by a competent law enforcement authority, acting within the limits conferred upon it by national law, conducting a crime investigation or a criminal intelligence operation.

Article 4a

Time limits for provision of information and intelligence

1.   Information and intelligence shall be provided without delay and to the furthest possible extent within the timeframe requested. If information or intelligence cannot be provided within the requested timeframe, the competent law enforcement authority having received a request for information or intelligence shall indicate the timeframe within which it can be provided. Such an indication shall be made immediately.

2.   Member States shall ensure that they have procedures in place so that they may respond within at most 12 hours to requests for information and intelligence where the requesting State indicates that it is carrying out a crime investigation or a criminal intelligence operation as regards the following offences, as defined by the law of the requesting State:

| — | participation in a criminal organisation, |
| --- | --- |

—

participation in a criminal organisation,

| — | terrorism, |
| --- | --- |

—

terrorism,

| — | trafficking in human beings, |
| --- | --- |

—

trafficking in human beings,

| — | sexual exploitation of children and child pornography, |
| --- | --- |

—

sexual exploitation of children and child pornography,

| — | illicit trafficking in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, |
| --- | --- |

—

illicit trafficking in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances,

| — | illicit trafficking in weapons, munitions and explosives, |
| --- | --- |

—

illicit trafficking in weapons, munitions and explosives,

| — | corruption, |
| --- | --- |

—

corruption,

| — | fraud, including that affecting the financial interests of the European Communities within the meaning of the Convention of 26 July 1995 on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests, |
| --- | --- |

—

fraud, including that affecting the financial interests of the European Communities within the meaning of the Convention of 26 July 1995 on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests,

| — | laundering of the proceeds of crime, |
| --- | --- |

—

laundering of the proceeds of crime,

| — | counterfeiting currency, including of the euro, |
| --- | --- |

—

counterfeiting currency, including of the euro,

| — | computer-related crime, |
| --- | --- |

—

computer-related crime,

| — | environmental crime, including illicit trafficking in endangered animal species and in endangered plant species and varieties, |
| --- | --- |

—

environmental crime, including illicit trafficking in endangered animal species and in endangered plant species and varieties,

| — | facilitation of unauthorised entry and residence, |
| --- | --- |

—

facilitation of unauthorised entry and residence,

| — | murder and grievous bodily injury, |
| --- | --- |

—

murder and grievous bodily injury,

| — | illicit trade in human organs and tissue, |
| --- | --- |

—

illicit trade in human organs and tissue,

| — | kidnapping, illegal restraint and hostage-taking, |
| --- | --- |

—

kidnapping, illegal restraint and hostage-taking,

| — | racism and xenophobia, |
| --- | --- |

—

racism and xenophobia,

| — | organised or armed robbery, |
| --- | --- |

—

organised or armed robbery,

| — | illicit trafficking in cultural goods, including antiques and works of art, |
| --- | --- |

—

illicit trafficking in cultural goods, including antiques and works of art,

| — | swindling, |
| --- | --- |

—

swindling,

| — | racketeering and extortion, |
| --- | --- |

—

racketeering and extortion,

| — | counterfeiting and piracy of products, |
| --- | --- |

—

counterfeiting and piracy of products,

| — | forgery of administrative documents and trafficking therein, |
| --- | --- |

—

forgery of administrative documents and trafficking therein,

| — | forgery of means of payment, |
| --- | --- |

—

forgery of means of payment,

| — | illicit trafficking in hormonal substances and other growth promoters, |
| --- | --- |

—

illicit trafficking in hormonal substances and other growth promoters,

| — | illicit trafficking in nuclear or radioactive materials, |
| --- | --- |

—

illicit trafficking in nuclear or radioactive materials,

| — | trafficking in stolen vehicles, |
| --- | --- |

—

trafficking in stolen vehicles,

| — | rape, |
| --- | --- |

—

rape,

| — | arson, |
| --- | --- |

—

arson,

| — | crimes within the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court, |
| --- | --- |

—

crimes within the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court,

| — | unlawful seizure of aircraft/ships, |
| --- | --- |

—

unlawful seizure of aircraft/ships,

| — | sabotage, |
| --- | --- |

—

sabotage,

| — | conduct which infringes road traffic regulations, including breaches of regulations pertaining to driving hours and rest periods and regulations on hazardous goods, |
| --- | --- |

—

conduct which infringes road traffic regulations, including breaches of regulations pertaining to driving hours and rest periods and regulations on hazardous goods,

| — | smuggling of goods, |
| --- | --- |

—

smuggling of goods,

| — | infringements of intellectual property rights, |
| --- | --- |

—

infringements of intellectual property rights,

| — | threats and acts of violence against persons and property, in particular violence during sports events or international events such as meetings of The European Council, |
| --- | --- |

—

threats and acts of violence against persons and property, in particular violence during sports events or international events such as meetings of The European Council,

| — | torture. |
| --- | --- |

—

torture.

Where the requesting State indicates that it wishes to have the information more rapidly, the requested State shall use its best endeavours to respond quickly to the request.

Article 5

Requests for information and intelligence

1.   Information and intelligence may be requested for the purpose of detection, prevention or investigation of an offence or a criminal activity involving the offences referred to in Article 3 where there are reasons to believe that relevant information and intelligence is available in another Member States.

2.   The requesting competent law enforcement authority shall refrain from requesting more information or intelligence or setting more narrow timeframes than necessary for the underlying purpose of the request.

3.   Requests for information or intelligence shall contain at least the information contained in the Annex to this Framework Decision (to be prepared).

Article 6

Categories of persons regarding which information or intelligence may be exchanged

1.   Exchange of information and intelligence under this Framework Decision may relate to persons who, in accordance with the national law of the requesting Member State:

| (a) | are suspected of having committed or taken part in a offence or a criminal activity involving the offences specified in Article 3, or |
| --- | --- |

(a)

are suspected of having committed or taken part in a offence or a criminal activity involving the offences specified in Article 3, or

| (b) | may, according to criminal intelligence or other evidentiary circumstances, commit or take part in an offence or a criminal activity involving the offences specified in Article 3, or |
| --- | --- |

(b)

may, according to criminal intelligence or other evidentiary circumstances, commit or take part in an offence or a criminal activity involving the offences specified in Article 3, or

| (c) | are not falling under category (a) or (b), but there are factual reasons to believe that an exchange of information and intelligence, as a necessary part of a criminal investigation or criminal intelligence operation, could assist in detecting, preventing or investigating a crime or a criminal activity involving the offences specified in Article 4(a). |
| --- | --- |

(c)

are not falling under category (a) or (b), but there are factual reasons to believe that an exchange of information and intelligence, as a necessary part of a criminal investigation or criminal intelligence operation, could assist in detecting, preventing or investigating a crime or a criminal activity involving the offences specified in Article 4(a).

2.   Exchange of information and intelligence may also take place with a view to identifying persons falling under categories 1(a) to (c).

Article 7

Communication channels

1.   Exchange of information and intelligence under this Framework Decision may take place via the Sirene bureaux or in accordance with Articles 4(4) and 5(4) of the Convention on the establishment of a European Police Office (the Europol Convention) or in customs matters via the central units as defined in Article 5(1) of the Convention on mutual assistance and cooperation between customs administrations or within any other framework established at bilateral or multilateral level among the Member States of the European Union. Any such framework shall be notified to the General Secretariat of the Council within three months of the entry in to force of this Framework Decision and subsequently notified to the other Member States. The notification shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

2.   Member States may agree, on a case-by-case basis or in general, that other channels may be used for the exchange of information and intelligence under this Framework Decision, for instance through liaison officers or directly between national or local law enforcement authorities.

3.   Information or intelligence not exchanged by virtue of Articles 4(4) and 5(4) of the Europol Convention shall be communicated also with Europol in accordance with the Europol Convention insofar as the exchange refers to an offence or criminal activity within the Europol mandate.

Article 8

Spontaneous exchange of information and intelligence

1.   Without prejudice to Articles 11(a) to (c), the competent law enforcement authorities shall, without being so requested, provide to the competent law enforcement authorities of other Member States concerned information and intelligence in case there are factual reasons to believe that the information and intelligence could assist in the detection, prevention or investigation of offences or a criminal activities involving the offences referred to in Article 4(a).

2.   The provision of information and intelligence shall be limited to what is deemed relevant and necessary for the successful detection, prevention or investigation of the crime or criminal activity in question.

Article 9

Data protection

1.   Each Member State shall ensure that the established rules and standards on data protection provided for when using the communication channels referred to in Article 7(1) are applied also within the procedure on exchange of information and intelligence provided for by this Framework Decision.

2.   Each Member State shall ensure that, where a communication channel referred to in Article 7(2) is used, the equivalent standards of data protection, as referred to in paragraph 1, are applied within the simplified procedure for exchange of information and intelligence provided for by this Framework Decision.

3.   Information and intelligence, including personal data, provided under this Framework Decision may be used by the competent law enforcement authorities of the Member State to which it has been provided for the purpose of:

| (a) | proceedings to which this Framework Decision applies; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

proceedings to which this Framework Decision applies;

| (b) | other law enforcement proceedings directly related to the one referred to under (a); |
| --- | --- |

(b)

other law enforcement proceedings directly related to the one referred to under (a);

| (c) | for preventing an immediate and serious threat to public security; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

for preventing an immediate and serious threat to public security;

| (d) | for any other purpose including prosecution or administrative proceedings only with the explicit prior consent of the competent law enforcement authority having provided the information or intelligence. |
| --- | --- |

(d)

for any other purpose including prosecution or administrative proceedings only with the explicit prior consent of the competent law enforcement authority having provided the information or intelligence.

4.   When providing information and intelligence in accordance with this Framework Decision, the providing competent law enforcement authority may pursuant to its national law impose conditions on the use of information and intelligence by the receiving competent law enforcement authority. Conditions may also be imposed on reporting the result of the criminal investigation or criminal intelligence operation within which the exchange of information and intelligence has taken place. The receiving competent law enforcement authority shall be bound by such conditions.

Article 10

Confidentiality

The competent law enforcement authorities shall take due account, in each specific case of exchange of information or intelligence, of the requirements of investigation secrecy. To that end the competent law enforcement authorities shall, in accordance with their national law, guarantee the confidentiality of all provided information and intelligence determined as confidential.

Article 11

Reasons to withhold information or intelligence

A competent law enforcement authority may refuse to provide information or intelligence only if there are factual reasons to assume that the provision of the information or intelligence would:

| (a) | harm essential national security interests of the requested Member State or; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

harm essential national security interests of the requested Member State or;

| (b) | jeopardise the success of a current investigation or a criminal intelligence operation or; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

jeopardise the success of a current investigation or a criminal intelligence operation or;

| (c) | be clearly disproportionate or irrelevant with regard to the purposes for which it has been requested. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

be clearly disproportionate or irrelevant with regard to the purposes for which it has been requested.

TITLE III

FINAL PROVISIONS

Article 12

Implementation

1.   Member States shall take the necessary measures to comply with the provisions of this Framework Decision two years after the entry into force of this Framework Decision.

2.   Member States shall transmit to the General Secretariat of the Council and the Commission the text of any provisions transposing into their national laws the obligations imposed on them under this Framework Decision. On the basis of this and other information, the Commission shall, two years after the date in paragraph 1, submit a report to the Council on the operation of this Framework Decision. The Council shall no later than one year after that date assess the extent to which the Member States have complied with this Framework Decision.

Article 13

Relation to other instruments

1.   Article 39, paragraphs 1 and 2, of the Schengen Implementation Convention are hereby repealed.

2.   Member States may continue to apply bilateral or multilateral agreements or arrangements in force when this Framework Decision is adopted in so far as such agreements or arrangements allow the objectives of this Framework Decision to be extended or enlarged and help to simplify or facilitate further the procedures for exchanging information and intelligence falling within the scope of this Framework Decision.

3.   Member States may conclude bilateral or multilateral agreements or arrangements after this Framework Decision has come into force in so far as such agreements or arrangements allow the objectives of this Framework Decision to be extended or enlarged and help to simplify or facilitate further the procedures for exchanging information falling within the scope of this Framework Decision.

4.   The agreements and arrangements referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 may in no case affect relations with Member States which are not parties to them.

5.   Member States shall, within three months from the entry into force of this Framework Decision, notify the Council and the Commission of the existing agreements and arrangements referred to in paragraph 2 which they wish to continue applying.

6.   Member States shall also notify the Council and the Commission of any new agreement or arrangement as referred to in paragraph 3, within three months of signing it.

Article 14

Entry into force

This Framework Decision shall enter into force on the day after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at

For the Council

The President

---

(1)  OJ L 176, 10.7.1999, p. 31.

1

---