alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CENTERGISTIC
SOLUTIONS, INC.
  Exhibit
31.2
 **CERTIFICATION**
 
 I, David
M. Cunningham, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer (principal
financial officer) of CENTERGISTIC SOLUTIONS, INC. (the "Company"), certify
that:
  1.
    I
      have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the
      quarter ended March 31, 2005;
  2.
    Based
      on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
      statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
      make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
      statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
      this report;
  3.
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
  4.
    The
      registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:
  a)  Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;
  b)  Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
  c)  Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
  5.
    The
      registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
      most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
      the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's
      board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  a)  All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
  b)  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.
  Date: May
13, 2005
  By:  /s/
David M. Cunningham
 David M.
Cunningham
 Chief
Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
 
 -40-
EXHIBIT 31.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Caroline  Rechia,  the  President,  Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer  and  Principal  Accounting Officer of Northridge Ventures Inc., certify
that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Northridge Ventures
Inc.;

2.     Based  on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of  a  material  fact  or  omit  to  state a material fact necessary to make the
statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to  the  period  covered  by this report;

3.     Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of,  and  for,  the  periods  presented  in  this  report;

4.     I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and I have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.     I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls.

6.     I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including
any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

January  14,  2010



By  /s/  Caroline  Rechia
Caroline Rechia
President, Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer
In re Alfred Lee MAULDIN v. B.O.P. and Warden W.F. Dalius, Jr. et al.

No. 578P03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 4, 2003.

Alfred Lee Mauldin, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of December 2003."
##### 



Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
    
    
    Management did not comply with established Company policies and procedures
requiring a review of the Companys consolidated statement of cash flows. This failure to
comply with established policies and procedures resulted in material misstatements in the
Companys December 31, 2004 consolidated statement of cash flows. Specifically, there were
material misstatements in cash flows from operating activities and cash flows from
investing activities.
    
    The Company did not have effective policies and procedures to evaluate
customer arrangements for the appropriate application of revenue recognition criteria as
contemplated by generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. This deficiency
resulted in material misstatements to the Companys financial statements, specifically the
overstatement of revenue, costs of sales, and accounts receivable, and the understatement
of inventory in the Companys previously filed consolidated financial statements as of and
for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004, and for the interim periods contained
therein. Accordingly, the Company has restated such consolidated financial statements to
reflect the correction of these errors.
    
    The Company did not have effective policies and procedures over accounting for
its inventory reserves to prevent the write up of inventory once it had been written down
in a previous fiscal accounting period. This deficiency resulted in material misstatements
of inventory and cost of sales in the Companys previously filed consolidated financial
statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004, and for the interim
periods contained therein. Accordingly, the Company has restated such consolidated
financial statements to reflect the correction of these errors.
    
    The Company lacked the depth of personnel with sufficient technical accounting expertise
to identify and account for complex transactions in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles in the U.S. This deficiency contributed to the aforementioned
misstatements and resulted in there being more than a remote likelihood that a material
misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements would not be prevented or
detected.
 /s/ KPMG LLPBoulder, ColoradoAugust 1, 2005
STATE of North Carolina v. Antoine STEELE.

No. 32P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 3, 2005.

Antoine Steele, Pro Se.

Edwin L. Gavin, II, Assistant Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 12th day of January 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*847"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of March 2005."
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FutureWorld Corp(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the first quarter ended June 30, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sam Talari, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:

 

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: August 19, 2014

 

 

/s/ Sam Talari                        

Sam Talari,

Principal Executive Officer
#### Grover Labaron HYATT, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HYSTER COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 22626.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

April 13, 1953.

Before L. HAND, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

Rose Lehman Stein, New York City, for plaintiff-appellee.

Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, New York City, Root, Ballantine, Harlan, Bush-by & Palmer, New York City, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

A joint motion having been made herein by counsel for the parties on stipulation to reverse the judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on June 20, 1952, 106 F.Supp. *676,*and for other and further relief,

Upon consideration thereof, it is

Ordered that said judgment of the United States District Court be and it hereby is reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the stipulation of the parties.

Further ordered that a mandate issue accordingly.
In the Matter of J.R., A.R.

No. COA02-1659.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

March 2, 2004.

County Attorney Jonathan V. Maxwell, by Deputy County Attorney Lynne G. Schiftan, for petitioner-appellee.

Cynthia A. Esworthy, Asheville, for respondent-appellant.

BRYANT, Judge.

Sirlena Rivera (respondent) appeals an order dated 8 October 2001 adjudicating her children J.R. and A.R. neglected.

On 30 May 2001, the Guilford County Department of Social Services (petitioner) filed a juvenile petition alleging respondent had neglected J.R. and A.R. The petition listed Elbert Isaac Williams (Williams) as J.R.'s father and Lennie Monroe (Monroe) as the putative father of A.R.1 At the adjudicatory hearing on 25 September 2001, Williams was not present but was represented by his attorney, who stipulated to a finding of neglect as alleged in the petition.2 Although neither respondent nor her counsel was present, the trial court commenced the adjudication phase of the proceeding. The trial court noted that "one of the parents," Williams, was "willing to enter into a consent ... at this time." In preparation for the consent order, the trial court inquired of the clerk of court whether she had the names of all the persons present. The trial court next asked: "And is it a consent as the facts are alleged in the petition?" The clerk replied that "[i]t is" and inquired whether the trial court wished to hear a summary of facts. Dana Hoxworth, the social worker who had signed the juvenile petition, then offered an unsworn summary of the facts alleged in the petition. Respondent's counsel did not arrive until after Hoxworth had concluded her recitation of facts and the trial court had already begun the dispositional stage of the hearing.3

At the conclusion of the hearing, the trial court directed that the findings in the order should read "as alleged in the petition." In its 8 October 2001 order, the trial court

1.

A paternity test later established that Monroe is not A.R.'s biological father.

2.

Williams does not appeal the trial court's order adjudicating the children neglected.

3.

In its order, the trial court summarily noted the presence of respondent's counsel at the proceeding. The order, however, was drafted after the conclusion of both the adjudicatory and dispositional hearings, and the transcript actually indicates respondent's counsel did not arrive until after the trial court's adjudication of neglect.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant To18 U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant ToSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hospira, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Terrence C. Kearney,Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Terrence C. Kearney  |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
| Terrence C. Kearney            |
| Senior Vice President, Finance |
| and Chief Financial Officer    |
| August 12, 2004           |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Hospira, Inc. and will be retained byHospira, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

1

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005 (the Periodic Report), I, T. Kevin DeNicola, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Millennium Chemicals Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Millennium Chemicals Inc.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                                  
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 15, 2006 |  | /s/ T. Kevin DeNicola                            
|                     |  | T. Kevin DeNicola                                
|                     |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Millennium Chemicals
Inc. and will be retained by Millennium Chemicals Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
      32.2








**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**











In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of DAIRY FRESH FARMS INC. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Don
      Paterson, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Don
              PatersonDon
                Paterson
              Principal
                Accounting OfficerDate:
              November 14, 2007
EXHIBIT 28.1
                                       ------------ 
                           ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE
                                UCFC FUNDING CORPORATION
                    MANUFACTURED HOUSING PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES
                                     SERIES 1996-1               
                                
 
    In accordance with Section 3.11 of that certain Pooling and
 Servicing Agreement relating to UCFC Funding Corporation
 Manufactured Housing Pass-Through Certificates Series 1996-1, 
 dated as of September 1, 1996 (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement"),
 by and among UCFC Funding Corporation, as depositor, United Companies 
 Lending Corporation, as servicer (the "Servicer"), and The First 
 National Bank of Chicago, as trustee, the undersigned officer
 of the Servicer does hereby certify as follows: (i) a review of
 the activities of the Servicer during 1996 and of performance
 under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under the
 undersigned officer's supervision; and (ii) to the best of such
 undersigned officer's knowledge, based on such review, the
 Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Pooling
 and Servicing Agreement for 1996.
 
    EXECUTED this 25th day of March, 1997. 
 
 
                                                                 
                        /s/ C. GERON HARGON
                        -------------------------------
                            C. Geron Hargon
                            President
                            United Companies Lending Corporation
     
                          PAGE 7
HomeEducationCurrents

# Waves

## Currents Tutorial

**Click the image**

----

Coastal currents are intricately tied to winds, waves, and land  formations. Winds that blow along the shoreline—longshore winds—affect  waves and, therefore, currents.

Before one can understand any type of surface current, one must  understand how wind and waves operate. Wave height is affected by wind  speed, wind duration (or how long the wind blows), and fetch, which is  the distance over water that the wind blows in a single direction. If  wind speed is slow, only small waves result, regardless of wind  duration or fetch. If the wind speed is great but it only blows for a  few minutes, no large waves will result even if the wind speed is  strong and fetch is unlimited. Also, if strong winds blow for a long  period of time but over a short fetch, no large waves form. Large waves  occur only when all three factors combine (Duxbury, et al, 2002.)

As wind-driven waves approach the shore, friction between the sea floor  and the water causes the water to form increasingly steep angles. Waves  that become too steep and unstable are termed “breakers” or “breaking  waves.”

### Currents Lessons

              - Welcome
              - Tidal Currents 1
              - Tidal Currents 2
              Coastal Currents
              - Waves
              - Longshore Currents
              - Rip Currents
              - Upwelling
              Surface Ocean Currents
              - The Coriolis Effect
              - Surface Ocean Currents
              - Boundary Currents
              - The Ekman Spiral
              The Global Conveyor Belt
              - Thermohaline Circulation
              - The Global Conveyor Belt
              - Effects of Climate Change
              How Are Currents Measured?
              - Age of Exploration
              - What is a "knot"?
              - Shallow Water Drifter
              - Deep Ocean Drifter
              - Current Profiler
              - Shore-based Current Meters
              - How Currents Affect Our Lives?
              - References
              - Roadmap to Resources
              - Subject Review

###### **Search** Education

###### Get **Social**

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -