alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Mary Cannon MORRIS, and Joseph E. Morris, individually and derivatively on behalf of the E.A. Morris Charitable Foundation, Plaintiffs v. John S. THOMAS, Katharine A. Thomas, K. Barry Morgan, and Dorothy S. Shaw, Defendants, and The E.A. Morris Charitable Foundation, Nominal Defendant, Intervenor and Interested Party Defendants.

No. 30P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 24, 2004.

Mack Sperling, Greensboro, Charles E. Coble, Raleigh, for Mary Cannon Morris and Joseph E. Morris.

*400George W. Dennis, III, Raleigh, Jacob H. Wellman, for John S. Thomas, Katharine A. Thomas, K. Barry Morgan and Dororthy S. Shaw.

Robert W. Fuller, Thomas P. Holderness, for The E.A. Morris Charitable Foundation.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th day of January 2004 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."

Justice EDMUNDS recused.
Joel Marvin MUNT, Petitioner, v. Eddie MILES, Warden.

No. 18-9098

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund V L.P. (the "Fund") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the Fund's general partner, Boston Capital Associates V L.L.C., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                  
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.



|                  |  |                            
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:             |  |                            
|November 21, 2005 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  | Marc N. Teal               
|                  |  | Principal Financial Officer
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  |                            



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Kavin Maurice RHODES, Petitioner v. Peter C. SWARTH, et al.

No. 19-5925

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for rehearing denied.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1228 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

300 Packerland Drive in Green Bay, Wisconsin, as the ‘‘Corporal Justin 

D. Ross Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 15, 2013 

Mr. RIBBLE (for himself, Mr. PETRI, Mr. RYAN of Wisconsin, Mr. DUFFY, 

Mr. KIND, Ms. MOORE, Mr. POCAN, and Mr. SENSENBRENNER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 300 Packerland Drive in Green Bay, Wisconsin, as the ‘‘Corporal Justin D. Ross Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CORPORAL JUSTIN D. ROSS POST OFFICE 

4 BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 300 Packerland Drive in Green 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1228 IH

1 Bay, Wisconsin, shall be known and designated as the 

2 ‘‘Corporal Justin D. Ross Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Corporal Justin D. 

7 Ross Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Assuretec Holdings, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we, R. Bruce
Reeves, Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer, and Kevin T. McGuire,
Secretary/Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:

     (1)  The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Registrant.


Date:    February 21, 2006                 By:      /s/ R. Bruce Reeves
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    R. Bruce Reeves, Ph.D.
                                                    President, CEO and Director



Date:    February 21, 2006                 By:      /s/  Kevin T. McGuire
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Kevin T. McGuire
                                                    Secretary/Treasurer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained
by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

                                      *****
STATE of North Carolina v. George Elton HINNANT.

No. 22A99-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2004.

George Elton Hinnant, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 23rd day of July 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Wake County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2004."
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

The Honorable William H. Stafford, Jr., Senior District Judge for the **

U.S. District Court for Northern Florida, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

GARY COLOMBO,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-10585

D.C. No. 2:07-cr-00080-CRWPAL-3

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Charles R. Wolle, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 9, 2011** 

San Francisco, California

Before: TROTT and BEA, Circuit Judges, and STAFFORD, Senior District

Judge.***

 

FILED

DEC 20 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

Gary Colombo pleaded guilty to participating in a massive wire fraud in

exchange for considerable favorable concessions by the government. 

Notwithstanding his plea agreement’s waiver of appeal clause, he appeals on two

related grounds, neither of which we conclude is valid. 

1) Colombo attacks the validity of his plea including his appeal waiver on

the ground that the agreement lacked a valid factual basis. We disagree. In his

signed and counseled agreement, he unmistakably admitted participating in the

alleged conspiracy with the requisite state of mind. When asked by the district

court if he was pleading guilty because he was guilty, he said “I’d guess I’d have to

say yes.” Not only is this record devoid of plain error, but his plea agreement and

his plea allocution taken together demonstrate a clear factual basis for the plea to

which he admitted.

2) Thus, his attempt to vitiate his waiver of the right to appeal fails. See

United States v. Michlin, 34 F.3d 896 (9th Cir. 1994); United States v. Baramdyka,

95 F.3d 840, 843 (9th Cir. 1996) (valid appeal waivers serve an “important

function in the judicial administrative process”).

APPEAL DISMISSED.
Independent Auditors' Report


To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Smith Barney Investment Funds Inc.:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements
of the Smith Barney Premier Selections All Cap Growth Fund of
Smith Barney Investment Funds Inc. ("Fund") for the year ended
April 30, 2002, we considered its internal control, including
control activities for safeguarding securities, in order to
determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing
our opinion on the financial statements and to comply with the
requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on the
internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Those controls include the safeguarding of assets against
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, error or
fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any
evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to
the risk that it may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in internal control that might be material
weaknesses under standards established by the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness is a
condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the
internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low
level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in
amounts that would be material in relation to the financial
statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a
timely period by employees in the normal course of performing
their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters involving
the internal control and its operation, including controls for
safeguarding securities that we consider to be material
weaknesses as defined above as of April 30, 2002.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management and the Board of Directors of the Fund and the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not intended to be and
should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.



New York, New York
June 12, 2002
STATE v. HENDRICKS

No. COA03-1556.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 21, 2004.

Certification Date October 11, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Premier Alliance Group, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March
31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), Mark S. Elliott, Acting Chief Executive and Financial
Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Premier Alliance Group, Inc., and will be retained by Premier
Alliance Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.


/s/ Mark S. Elliott
--------------------
Mark S. Elliott
Acting Chief Executive and Financial Officer
May 15, 2008
TILLEY v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES

No. COA04-301.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 16, 2004

Certification Date December 6, 2004

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1356 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1444 Main Street in Ramona, California, as the ‘‘Nelson ‘Mac’ 

MacWilliams Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 21, 2013 

Mr. HUNTER (for himself, Mr. SCHIFF, Ms. LINDA T. SA ́NCHEZ of California, 

Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Ms. MATSUI, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. HONDA, Ms. 

WATERS, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. COSTA, Mr. FARR, Mr. ROYCE, Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. 

NUNES, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, 

Mrs. CAPPS, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. COOK, Ms. BROWNLEY of California, Mrs. 

NEGRETE MCLEOD, Mr. VARGAS, Mr. LAMALFA, Ms. CHU, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. MCCARTHY of California, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. 

MCNERNEY, Mr. GARAMENDI, Mr. DENHAM, Mr. TAKANO, Ms. HAHN, 

Mr. SWALWELL of California, Mr. RUIZ, Ms. LOFGREN, Mrs. DAVIS of 

California, Mr. BERA of California, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Mr. VALADAO, Mr. 

HUFFMAN, and Ms. BASS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1444 Main Street in Ramona, California, as 

the ‘‘Nelson ‘Mac’ MacWilliams Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1356 IH

1 SECTION 1. NELSON ‘‘MAC’’ MACWILLIAMS POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 1444 Main Street in Ramona, 

5 California, as the ‘‘Nelson ‘Mac’ MacWilliams Post Office 

6 Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Nelson ‘Mac’ 

11 MacWilliams Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial OfficerPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Theundersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer ofFieldstone Investment Corporation (the “Company”), each hereby certifies that,to his knowledge on the date hereof:

(a)                                  TheForm 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2006filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)                                 Informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| May 15,  2006 | /s/ Michael J. Sonnenfeld                            |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|               | Michael J. Sonnenfeld                                |
|               | President and Chief Executive Officer                |
|               |                                                 |
|               | /s/ Nayan V. Kisnadwala                              |
|               | Nayan V. Kisnadwala                                  |
|               | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Donald Gayhardt, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dollar Financial Corp.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: c) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  d) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  e) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): f) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  g) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.         Date:  May 9, 2006                      */s/ Donald Gayhardt*          DonaldGayhardt         President  
48
Paul DURISO, Petitioner, v. WEST GULF MARITIME ASSOCIATION, et al.

No. 18-9426

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
----

Notice of the date of entry into force of Decision No 4/2004 of the EU-Mexico Joint Council, amending Joint Council Decision No 2/2001

The contracting parties having notified one another of the completion of the procedures required for entry into force of Decision No 4/2004 of the EU-Mexico Joint Council, as approved by the Council of the European Union at its meeting on 13 December 2004, the Decision will enter into force with effect from 18 May 2005, in accordance with Article 3 thereof.

----
# Official Journal C 138/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 138 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6215 April 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 138

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6215 April 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 138/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2019/C 138/02 | Commission Implementing Decision of 8 April 2019 on the publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of the application for approval of an amendment, which is not minor, to a product specification referred to in Article 53 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council for the name ‘Pomodoro S. Marzano dell’Agro Sarnese-Nocerino’ (PDO) | 2 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 138/01

Euro exchange rates

1

2019/C 138/02

Commission Implementing Decision of 8 April 2019 on the publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of the application for approval of an amendment, which is not minor, to a product specification referred to in Article 53 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council for the name ‘Pomodoro S. Marzano dell’Agro Sarnese-Nocerino’ (PDO)

Official Journal of the European Union

2

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**Exhibit 15.3**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-226216) of Bilibili Inc. of our report dated March 29, 2019 relating to the financial statements, which appears in this Form 20-F.

 

 
| /s/   PricewaterhouseCoopers Zhong Tian LLP    |   |
|------------------------------------------------|--------|
| PricewaterhouseCoopers   Zhong Tian LLP        |   |
|                                           |   |
| Beijing, the People’s   Republic of China |   |
|                                           |   |
| March 29, 2019                            |   |

 

----