alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of T Bancshares, Inc. (the
      “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Patrick G. Adams, as
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Terry Purchal, as Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
      his knowledge:




(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




T
                BANCSHARES, INC.





Date:
                November 14, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Patrick G. AdamsPatrick
                G. Adams
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              Principal
                Executive OfficerDate:
                November 14, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Terry PurchalTerry
                Purchal
              Chief
                Financial Officer
              Principal
                Financial Officer
Guy COZZI, Petitioner, v. AMERICAN STOCK EXCHANGE, et al.

No. 19-6822

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York denied.
U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
				Here's how you know we're official. **Official websites use .gov** A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure websites use HTTPS** A small lock or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to a .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Toggle navigation Toggle search National Ocean Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
 Search
					Search National Ocean Service


Home
				Ocean Facts

				Topics
					Explore All Topics 
                        Arctic 
                        Careers 
                        Economy 
                        Ecosystems 
                        Geodesy 
                        Hazards 
                        International
                        Navigation 
                        Observations 
                        Ocean 
                        Recreation 
                         Sea Level Rise 
                        Story Maps 
                        Tools
                
                			Education

				
				News
				Podcasts
				Video
				Images
				About Us


1. Home
2. Coming Soon

We are currently revising the following educational offerings:  Nautical Charts: Message in a Bottle
	Prince William's Oily Mess: A Tale of Recovery
	The Lionfish Invasion!
		Sea Floor Mapping  We invite you to visit our other educational offerings in the interim:  For Educators
 For Students
  For Kids


Feedback Provide Feedback
							Contact Us
							Report an error
 Social Instagram Logo/a>


*Science. Service.Stewardship.*
 About NOS About Us
							NOS Program Offices
							Media Inquiries
							Website Acknowledgements
                            Site Index
							Disclaimer
 More Resources Freedom of Information Act
							Accessibility
							Information Quality
							Privacy Policy
							NOS For Employees
							USA.gov
 Department of Commerce
									National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
									National Ocean Service
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-13143, 333-13717, 333-53139, 333-55878 and
333-76674) of our report dated January 25, 2002 relating to the financial
statements, which appears in the Millennium Chemicals Inc. Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. We also consent to the incorporation
by reference of our report dated January 25, 2002 relating to the supplemental
financial information and the financial statement schedule, which appear in such
Form 10-K.




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Florham Park, New Jersey
March 29, 2002
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Donald E. Fowler, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of SumTotal Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SumTotal Systems, Inc.



/s/ DONALD E. FOWLERDonald E. FowlerChief Executive Officer and DirectorDate: November 8, 2006


I, Neil J. Laird, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of SumTotal Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SumTotal Systems, Inc.



/s/ NEIL J. LAIRDNeil J. LairdExecutive Vice President and ChiefFinancial OfficerDate: November 8, 2006
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

____________________________________ )

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) Criminal No. 21

- 00 90 (PLF)

)

NATHANIEL J. DEGRAVE

, )

)

Defendant. )

____________________________________)

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

T he defendant in this case , Nathaniel J. DeGrave, and the defendant in Criminal

No. 21

- 0088

, Ronald L. Sandlin, are charged with engaging in concerted activity as described by

the government and the same video evidence is relevant to both proceedings . For whatever

reason, the government chose not to charge them in the same indictment so that these two

defendants would be before the same ju dge. I n view of that fact and of the asserted relative

culpability of these two defendants, the Court thinks it appropriate for a decision on pretrial

detention with respect to Mr. Sandlin to be rendered prior to a decision with respect to Mr.

DeGrave. T he Court therefore will vacate the detention hearing currently set for April 2, 2021

at 10:00 a.m. and will reschedule the hearing as soon as practicable following a ruling by Judge

Friedrich concerning pretrial detention of Mr. Sandlin in Criminal No. 21

- 0088

.

For the reasons described herein, it is in the interests of justice to continue to toll

the running of the Speedy Trial Act for a reasonable time until the detention hearing is

rescheduled

. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) . In addition, this period of time is properly excluded

under the Speedy Trial Act as the time from the filing of a pretrial motion through the conclusion

of the hearing on such motion. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(D). I t therefore is hereby2 ORDERED that the detention hearing pr eviously scheduled for April 2 , 2021

at 10:00 a.m. is VACATED ; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that a new date for the detention hearing in this case will

be set after Judge Friedrich rules on Mr. Sandlin’s Motion to Lift Preventive Detention in

Criminal No. 21

- 0088 ; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that in the interests of justice and because a pretrial

motion is pending, the time from April 2, 2021 through and including the date of the rescheduled

detention hearing is excluded from the Speedy Trial Act computation.

SO ORDERED.

____ /s/

____________________ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN

United States District Judge

DATE: April 1, 2021
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-60673

Summary Calendar

GEORGE DUNBAR PREWITT, JR.,

Appellant.

------------------------------------------------------ Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:96-MC-1

--------------------------------------------------------

February 5, 2003

Before JONES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

George Dunbar Prewitt, Jr., appeals the district court’s order deny ing his F E D

. R. C IV

. P.

60(b)(4) motion challenging the magistrate judge’s sua sponte order barring Prewitt from the third

f loor of the United States Courthouse and Federal Building in Greenville, Mississipp i. The

requirement that Rule 60(b) motions be brought within a reasonable time is not enforced with respect

to motions under Rule 60(b)(4). S ee Carter v. Fenner , 136 F.3d 1000, 1006 (5th Ci r. 1998).-2-

Accordingly, the district court erred in denying the motion on the ground that it was not filed with

a reasonable time.

Although Prewitt could be barred from the courthouse for the reasons listed by the magistrate

judge, Prewitt should have been provided with notice and an opportu nity to respond. S ee B JOE

Thomson

, No. 02-20191 (5th Cir. Sept. 19, 2002) (unpublished). We vacate the district court’s order

and remand this matter with instructions that Prewitt be ordered by the district court to show cause

why he should not be barred from the third floor of the courthouse in the future.

VACATE AND REMAND WITH INSTRUCTIONS.
LARKIN v. LARKIN.

No. 452A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 29, 2004.

John M. Martin, Greenville, Cindi M. Quay, New Bern, for Mary Jo Tatum Larkin.

*694Dallas Clark, Jr., Greenville, for Ernest Larkin.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 24th day of November 2004 by Plaintiff for Extension of Time to File Brief:

> "Motion Allowed. Plaintiff (Ernest Larkin) shall have up to and including the 20th day of December 2004 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 29th day of November 2004."
Dannie Joe FARNUM, Petitioner v. Scott FRAUENHEIM, Warden

No. 19-6180

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4849 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4849

To prohibit discrimination in Federal assisted health care services and 
 research programs on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin, 
               sexual orientation, or disability status.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 19, 2007

Ms. Richardson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit discrimination in Federal assisted health care services and 
 research programs on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin, 
               sexual orientation, or disability status.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Equal Rights for Health Care Act 
Title 42''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON DISCRIMINATION IN FEDERAL ASSISTED HEALTH CARE 
              SERVICES AND RESEARCH PROGRAMS ON THE BASIS OF SEX, RACE, 
              COLOR, NATIONAL ORIGIN, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, OR DISABILITY 
              STATUS.

    No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, race, 
color, national origin, sexual orientation, or disability status, be 
excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be 
subjected to discrimination under any health care service or research 
program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
                                 <all>
```
Samuel R. JONES, Petitioner v. Erica HUSS

No. 19-6625

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 21, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
MARK PRESTON BOHNER , Appellant,

v. STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
CASE NO. 1D 14

- 1808

____ _________________________/ Opinion filed February 16, 2015. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County

. John L. Miller , Judge

. Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Joanna A. Mauer, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee , for Appellant.
Pa mela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Charles R. McCoy, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

BILBREY, J

. This case is before us on direct appeal in an Involuntary Civil Commitment of Sexually Violent Predators Act case (the Jimmy Ryce Act), sections 394.910

- 931, Florida Statutes, with Mark Preston Bohner, the appellant/committee allegingineffective assistance of trial counsel. No other claim of error is asserted in the appeal.
In Manning v. State , 913 So. 2d 37 (Fla. 1st D CA 2005), we held that claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel in Jimmy Ryce Act cases ca nnot be raised on direct appeal, except in “the rare case where counsel’s ineffectiveness can be
discerned from the face of the record ...” Although Jimmy R yce Act cases are civil in nature, this same prohibition against raising ineffectiveness of counsel claims on direct appeal

- - except where the ineffectiveness is apparent on the face of the record

-- applies in criminal cases. Gor e v. Stat e , 784 So. 2d 4 18, 437

- 8 (Fla. 2001). Subsequent to our decision in Manning and subsequent to Judge Altenbernd pointing out in Ivey v. Department of Children and Family Services , 974 So. 2d 480 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008), the need for a rule of procedure to address the appropria te mechanism to bring an ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim in a Jimmy Ryce Act case, the Florida Supreme Court adopted rule 4.460, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure for Involuntary Commitment of Sexually Violent Predators. The rule provides tha t ineffectiveness of trial counsel may be asserted by filing a habeas corpus petition. The State asks us to hold that rule 4.460, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure for Involuntary Commitment of Sexually Violent Predators, now provides the sole

2mechanism to raise an ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim in a Jimmy Ryce Act case. We find it unnecessary to decide that issue. The appellant has not shown trial counsel to be ineffective from the face of the record in this direct appeal and no claim for extraordinary relief is before the Court. Accordingly, we DISMISS the appeal. RAY and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.

3
Matthew G. MUNKSGARD, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5457

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 21, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
STATE v. WRIGHT

No. COA03-1350.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 5, 2004.

Certification Date October 25, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 122 (Monday, June 27, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38249-38250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13625]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No. 01/01-0412]


Surrender of License of Small Business Investment Company; North 
Atlantic SBIC IV, L.P.

    Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small 
Business Administration under the Small Business Investment Act of 
1958, as amended, under Section 309 of the Act and Section 107.1900 of 
the Small Business Administration Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 
107.1900) to function as a small business investment company under the 
Small Business Investment Company License No. 01/01-0412 issued to 
North Atlantic SBIC

[[Page 38250]]

IV, LP, said license is hereby declared null and void.

Bailey DeVries,
Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation.
[FR Doc. 2022-13625 Filed 6-24-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 482 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to transfer ownership of the American 

River Pump Station Project, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 16, 2007 

Mr. DOOLITTLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to transfer ownership 

of the American River Pump Station Project, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American River Pump 

5 Station Project Transfer Act of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER. 

7 The Secretary of the Interior (hereafter in this Act 

8 referred to as the ‘‘Secretary’’) shall transfer ownership 

9 of the American River Pump Station Project located at 

10 Auburn, California, which includes the Pumping Plant, asVerDate Aug 31 2005 22:28 Jan 17, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H482.IH H482

pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 482 IH

1 sociated facilities, and easements necessary for permanent 

2 operation of the facilities, to the Placer County Water 

3 Agency, in accordance with the terms of Contract No. 02– 

4 LC–20–7790 between the United States and Placer Coun5 ty Water Agency and the terms and conditions established 

6 in this Act. 

7 SEC. 3. FEDERAL COSTS NONREIMBURSABLE. 

8 Federal costs associated with construction of the 

9 American River Pump Station Project located at Auburn, 

10 California, are nonreimbursable. 

11 SEC. 4. GRANT OF REAL PROPERTY INTEREST. 

12 The Secretary is authorized to grant title to Placer 

13 County Water Agency as provided in section 2 in full satis14 faction of the United States’ obligations under Land Pur15 chase Contract 14–06–859–308 to provide a water supply 

16 to the Placer County Water Agency. 

17 SEC. 5. COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS. 

18 (a) IN GENERAL.—Before conveying land and facili19 ties pursuant to this Act, the Secretary shall comply with 

20 all applicable requirements under— 

21 (1) the National Environmental Policy Act of 

22 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.); 

23 (2) the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 

24 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.); and 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HR 482 IH

1 (3) any other law applicable to the land and fa2 cilities. 

3 (b) EFFECT.—Nothing in this Act modifies or alters 

4 any obligations under— 

5 (1) the National Environmental Policy Act of 

6 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.); or 

7 (2) the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 

8 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). 

9 SEC. 6. RELEASE FROM LIABILITY. 

10 Effective on the date of transfer to the Placer County 

11 Water Agency of any land or facility under this Act, the 

12 United States shall not be liable for damages arising out 

13 of any act, omission, or occurrence relating to the land 

14 and facilities, consistent with Article 9 of Contract No. 

15 02–LC–20–7790 between the United States and Placer 

16 County Water Agency. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
STATE of North Carolina v. Willie Lee FLOYD, Jr.

No. 287P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 12, 2004.

Willie Lee Floyd, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Mitchell D. Norton, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 14th day of June 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Beaufort County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th day of August 2004."
# Official Journal C 169/22 A

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 169 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6522 April 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 169

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6522 April 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 169/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2022/C 169/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections | 13 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 169/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2022/C 169/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections

13

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN