alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alesco Financial Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, James J. McEntee, III and John J. Longino, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: August 9,
2007



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ James J. McEntee, III                                  
|James J. McEntee, III Chief Executive Officer and
President



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/s/ John J. Longino                    
|John J. Longino Chief Financial
Officer
Exhibit 10.20

 

Party A (Lender): Zhao Jie

ID number: 652901197610056918

 

Party B: (Borrower) WiMi Capital Light Investment Management (Beijing) Co., Ltd.

 

In accordance with relevant laws and regulations, on the basis of equality and in line with the principle of equality and willingness, party A and party B have reached the following agreement on the interest-free loan from party B to party A through negotiation:

 

Article 1 Loan amount: party B borrows RMB167 million (in figures :RMB167, 000,000. 00) from party A.

 

Article 2 Interest on loan: party A shall not pay interest on the amount lent to party B within the term of the loan.

 

Article 3 Purpose of loan: business development and daily operation of the company; shall be returned or lent according to the business development and capital turnover.

 

Article 4 Party B shall designate the following bank account to make collections and guarantee its authenticity and validity.

 

Account name: WiMi Capital Light Investment Management (Beijing) Co., Ltd.

 

Bank of deposit: Beijing East Fourth Ring Road Branch, China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.

 

Account: 110917111610901

 

Article 5 Guarantee terms: party B must use the loan according to the purpose stipulated in the loan contract and shall not use the loan for illegal activities.

 

Article 6 Settlement of contract disputes: any dispute arising from the process of performing the contract shall be settled by both parties through friendly negotiation. If no agreement can be reached through negotiation, either party may file a lawsuit with the People’s Court at the place where party A is located.

 

Article 7 This agreement is made in duplicate, with each party holding one copy. It shall come into force upon being signed or sealed by both parties.

 

(No text below)

 

Party A (Seal)

 

Legal Representative: Zhao Jie

 

Date of signing: November 2nd, 2016

 

Party B (Seal)

Legal Representative:

 

Date of signing: November 2nd, 2016
Independent Auditors' Report


To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Smith Barney Investment Funds Inc.:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements
of the Smith Barney Small Cap Growth Fund of Smith Barney
Investment Funds Inc. (the Fund) for the year ended September 30,
2001, we considered its internal control, including control
activities for safeguarding securities, in order to determine our
auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on
the financial statements and to comply with the requirements of
Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on the internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles. Those controls include the safeguarding of
assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or
fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any
evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to
the risk that it may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in the internal control that might be
material weaknesses under standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness
is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of
the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively
low level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in
amounts that would be material in relation to the financial
statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a
timely period by employees in the normal course of performing
their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters involving
the internal control and its operation, including controls for
safeguarding securities that we consider to be material
weaknesses as defined above.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management, the Board of Directors of the Fund, and the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not intended to be and
should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.



New York, New York
November 13, 2001
**Exhibit 35.1**

 

**Servicer Compliance Statement of John Deere Capital Corporation**

 

 

I, Steven N. Owenson, Senior Vice President and Controller of John Deere Capital Corporation, state:

 

A review of John Deere Capital Corporation’s activities for the period from February 28, 2018 (the date of issuance of the John Deere Owner Trust 2018 transaction subject to the requirements of Regulation AB) through October 28, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”) and of John Deere Capital Corporation’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 28, 2018 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables, Inc. and John Deere Owner Trust 2018 has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, John Deere Capital Corporation has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

 

 
| Date: January 11,   2019 | * * | John Deere Capital Corporation.        |
|-------------------------------|----------|----------------------------------------|
|                          |     |                                   |
| * *                      | * * | * *                               |
|                          | By:      | */s/ Steven N. Owenson*                |
|                          |     | Steven N. Owenson                      |
|                          |     | Senior Vice President   and Controller |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1451 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1451

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
14 Main Street in Brockport, New York, as the ``Staff Sergeant Nicholas 
                     J. Reid Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. STAFF SERGEANT NICHOLAS J. REID POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 14 Main Street in Brockport, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Staff Sergeant Nicholas J. Reid Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Staff 
Sergeant Nicholas J. Reid Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
BOYCE & ISLEY, PLLC, Eugene Boyce, R. Daniel Boyce, Philip R. Isley, and Laura B. Isley v. Roy A. COOPER, III, the Cooper Committee, Julia White, Stephen Bryant, and Kristi Hyman.

No. 598P02-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 4, 2004.

R. Daniel Boyce, Pro Se.

*779Philip R. Isley, Pro Se.

Laura B. Isley, Pro Se.

John A. Bussian, Durham, for NC Press Assn., NC Assn. Broadcast.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 29th day of December 2003 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 731, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed as Moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of March 2004."

Chief Justice LAKE and Justices PARKER and ORR recused.
NOAA

TOOLS OF THE TRADE

How NOAA Scientists Map What Lies Beneath the Waves 1 SHIP Multibeam & Fish Sonar

GLIDER

ROV

Autonomous Ocean 'Robots' Collect Data

Hi-Def Video

Some NOAA ships are equipped with high-tech sonar systems that use sound to eciently map large swaths of 

the ocean. Multibeam sonar is used to 'paint the seaoor with sound' to create highly detailed maps. Scientic 

grade sh sonar is used to map where sh and other objects are located in the water column.

The maps created with these tools allow people to visualize the seaoor, coral 

reef ecosystems, and sh populations in amazing detail. These data are used 

to update nautical charts, to help preserve and protect underwater 

ecosystems, and to simply better understand what lies beneath the waves. 

HOW IS THIS INFORMATION USED? 

WHILE SCIENTISTS USE DIFFERENT METHODS TO MAP WHAT LIES BENEATH 

THE WAVES, TWO OF THE MOST IMPORTANT TOOLS ARE SONAR AND VIDEO. 

Gliders are used for many things, from collecting ocean characteristics such as temperature, to nding where 

sh are spawning by recording underwater sounds. Once these torpedo-shaped vehicles are launched, they 

operate independently and report their ndings back to the ship.

2

While sound (sonar) is a great way to create detailed underwater maps of large areas of the ocean, remotely 

operated vehicles (ROVs) are used to take a closer look at what lies below. ROVs equipped with mounted 

cameras help scientists conrm sh species, nd out if corals are healthy, and identify specic objects. 

3
EX-10.16(b)





 Exhibit 10.16(b) 

SECOND AMENDMENT 
 TO THE

 2015 SEAGATE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN 

The 2015 Seagate Deferred Compensation Plan, as established January 1, 2015 (the “Plan”), is hereby amended as follows: 

 

	 	1.	 Effective January 1, 2016, Exhibit A is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:



 “EXHIBIT A 

PARTICIPATING COMPANIES 

Dot Hill Systems Corp. 
 EVault,
A Seagate Company 
 LaCie Ltd. 

Lyve Minds, Inc. 
 Seagate
Federal, Inc. 
 Seagate Technology LLC 

Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc. 

Xyratex International Inc.” 
  

	 	2.	 In all respects not amended, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed. 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Seagate Benefits Administrative Committee, by its duly authorized officer, has executed this Second Amendment to the
Plan on Oct 29th, 2015. 
 SEAGATE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE 

 

			
	By:	 	 /s/ John Cleveland

		 	John Cleveland
		
	Title:	 	Vice President, Global Compensation, Benefits, Mobility & Compliance
STATE v. GARRETT.

No. COA03-985.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 7, 2004.

Certification Date September 27, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK>
<NAME> AIM Capital Appreciation Portfolio
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER>        12
   <NAME>Travelers Series Fund Inc.

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  Oct-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                       Oct-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>              311,219,778
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>             438,416,784
<RECEIVABLES>                        4,230,034
<ASSETS-OTHER>                           4,348
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     442,651,166
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>             1,895,874
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                      0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>            5,995,660
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                  7,891,534
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                              0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>           233,910,005
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>               20,003,725
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>               18,376,228
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                    0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                       0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>             73,652,621
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                     0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>           127,197,006
<NET-ASSETS>                       434,759,632
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                      681,621
<INTEREST-INCOME>                    1,347,248
<OTHER-INCOME>                               0
<EXPENSES-NET>                       3,496,795
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>             (1,467,926)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>            73,848,449
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>           39,482,849
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>              111,863,372
<EQUALIZATION>                               0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                    0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                     0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                        0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>              9,967,211
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>          8,810,050
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                    470,336
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>             135,240,026
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                      0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>           10,058,139
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                      0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                   0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                3,363,224
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                      3,496,795
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>               419,089,941
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                   16.300
<PER-SHARE-NII>                         (0.070)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                  6.030
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                     0.000
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                0.530
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                     0.000
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                     21.730
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                           0.83



</TABLE>
KENNEDY v. BRANCH BANKING & TRUST CO..

No. COA03-1401.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 6, 2004.

Certification Date July 26, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Robert HOCH, Petitioner v. MBI ENERGY SERVICES

No. 19-444

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4766 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on electric juice extractors. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 17, 2007 

Mr. SCOTT of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on electric juice 

extractors. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELECTRIC JUICE EXTRACTORS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.44 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended 

6 by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

9 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

10 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
#### C. H. BROWN v. THOMAS KEARNS.1

June 18, 1909.

Nos. 16,129—(124).

Action in the municipal court of Winona to recover $70 for rent. Prom a judgment entered in favor of defendant, he appealed to the district court for Winona county where the case was tried-before Snow, J., and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of defendant. Prom an order denying plaintiff’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict but granting a new trial, defendant appealed.

Affirmed.

*W. T. Valentine,*for appellant;

*Twwney, Smith £ Tawney,*for respondent.

1

 .Reported in 121 N. W. 1133.

Pee Cueiam.

Plaintiff and respondent sought to recover from defendant and appellant $70, with interest, for rent. A jury in the municipal court, and upon appeal in the district court, returned a verdict for defendant and against plaintiff. The district court granted a new trial. The only question presented on appeal is whether it thereby abused its discretion. An examination of the record has satisfied us that no such abuse appears. It would serve no useful purpose to discuss at length the details of the facts, which involve no controversy of principle and which are of no general interest.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q REPORT  OF  REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC.  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  (CHAPTER 63, TITLE 18 U.S.C.
SS.SS. 1350(a) AND (b))

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350(a) and (b)), the
undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
November 7, 2008

|                                                                     |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ GILBERT M. CASSAGNE Gilbert M. Cassagne,
Chief Executive Officer |  | 

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350(a) and (b)), is not
a part of the Form 10-Q to which it refers and is, to the extent permitted by law, provided by the above signatory to the extent of his knowledge.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
**Exhibit 31.4**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Stephen Gorgol, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K amending the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019 of Replimune Group, Inc.;

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
| Date:   July 26, 2019 | By:      | /s/ STEPHEN GORGOL                                         |
|----------------------------|----------|------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |     | Stephen Gorgol                                             |
|                       | * * | *Chief Accounting Officer   (Principal Financial Officer)* |

 

----
Order filed November 24, 2021

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals ____________

No. 11-18-00102-CR

____________

JESSE VILLAFRANCO, JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 441st District Court

Midland County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CR45624

O R D E R

On April 23, 2020, this court issued an opinion and judgment in which we 

affirmed the judgments of the trial court. Appellant, Jesse Villafranco, Jr., sought 

discretionary review in the Court of Criminal Appeals. The Court of Criminals 

Appeals granted such review and has now issued an opinion and mandate reversing 

this court’s April 23, 2020 judgment and remanding the cause to this court. In its 

opinion, the Court of Criminal Appeals ordered this court to abate the case for the 

trial court to hold a retrospective, adversarial hearing on the admissibility of the 

evidence of prior sexual abuse. Villafranco v. State, PD-0488-20, 2021 WL 

5355194, at *1, *5 (Tex. Crim. App. Oct. 20, 2021); see TEX. R. EVID. 412; see also

LaPointe v. State, 225 S.W.3d 513, 520–24 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007). In accordance 
2

with the directive of the Court of Criminal Appeals, we abate this appeal and remand 

the cause to the trial court. 

Appellant must be given an opportunity to perfect the record so that this court

can properly review the admissibility issue. Villafranco, 2021 WL 5355194, at *2 

(citing LaPointe, 225 S.W.3d at 521). As stated by the Court of Criminal Appeals 

in LaPointe: 

The purpose of allowing defense participation in the [Rule 412]

hearing is to give the defendant the opportunity to substantiate his claim 

that the victim’s prior sexual history is admissible. The proper remedy 

[is] to abate the appeal and remand the case to the trial court to afford 

the defendant an adversarial hearing in which he [has] an opportunity 

to make that showing. Once that [is] done, [this court will] then be in 

a position to intelligently review the issue of whether the prior sexual 

history evidence was admissible.

LaPointe, 225 S.W.3d at 523.

The trial court is directed to hold a retrospective hearing in accordance with 

the October 20, 2021 opinion issued by the Court of Criminal Appeals in this cause. 

See Villafranco, 2021 WL 5355194, at *1, *5. The hearing must be recorded by the 

court reporter. Id. at *2. Appellant, Appellant’s counsel, and the prosecutor are to 

be present for the hearing, and the attorneys are to be permitted to question the victim 

and present evidence regarding prior sexual abuse of the victim. Id. 

A supplemental reporter’s record from the hearing shall be sealed in 

accordance with Rule 412(d) and shall be filed in this court no later than January 28, 

2022. This appeal will be reinstated when the supplemental reporter’s record is filed

in this court.

November 24, 2021 PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.