alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 10.5**

 

 

July 14, 2005

 

 

John Simonelli

Graymark Productions, Inc.

101 North Robinson

Suite 920

Oklahoma City, OK 73102

 

Dear John:

 

Reference is made to that certain short-form agreement between ImageEntertainment, Inc. (“Image”) and Graymark Productions, Inc. (“Graymark”), asamended, dated as of July         2005(the “Agreement”).  Although we have notyet executed a long-form agreement or decided upon a vehicle for the venture,please note that Image is prepared to accept and finance the film “***Surveillance***” (the “Program”)pursuant to the Agreement, under the following terms and conditions:

 
| Total Budget:    |   | Approximately Five Hundred Sixty-Nine  Thousand Two Hundred Twenty-Six Dollars ($569,226). Image shall finance Two  Hundred Eighty-Four Thousand Six Hundred Thirteen Dollars ($284,613) of the  total budget. Payment of the $284,613 shall be per the terms of the  Agreement. |
|------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|             |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
| All Other Terms: |   | As per the Agreement                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |

 

If the above meets with your approval, please have your client signbelow.  Thank you.

 
|   | Best regards,                                                   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                            |
|   |                                                            |
|   | Dennis Hohn Cho, Esq.                                           |
|   | Senior Vice  President, Business Affairs &  General Counsel |

 

 

**THE ABOVE IS ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED.**

 

**GRAYMARK PRODUCTIONS, INC.**

 
|                |   |
|---------------------|--------|
| By: John  Simonelli |
| Title:              |

 

----
Ronda F. WRIGHT v. Corey A. KRAUS.

No. 278P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 24, 2004.

Lawrence P. Margolis, for Ronda F. Wright.

Lisa F. Schwanz, for Corey A. Kraus.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th day of June 2004 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> 
*470
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."
Anthony L. PIERCE, Petitioner v. Lisa GARRETT, et al.

No. 19-5461

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1480 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1480

To amend chapter 83 of title 41, United States Code (commonly known as 
   the Buy American Act), to require each department or independent 
     establishment to conduct an annual audit of its contracts for 
         compliance with such chapter, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2013

 Ms. Shea-Porter introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
            the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend chapter 83 of title 41, United States Code (commonly known as 
   the Buy American Act), to require each department or independent 
     establishment to conduct an annual audit of its contracts for 
         compliance with such chapter, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Buy America Accountability Act of 
2013''.

SEC. 2. AUDIT OF CONTRACTS REQUIRED.

    Section 8302 of title 41, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(c) Audit of Contracts Required.--
            ``(1) In general.--Not later than 90 days after the end of 
        a fiscal year, the head of each department or independent 
        establishment shall submit to Congress a report that contains 
        an evaluation performed by such department or independent 
        establishment of contractor compliance with the provisions of 
        this chapter for at least 10 percent of the contracts awarded 
        by the department or independent establishment during that 
        fiscal year for the procurement of articles, materials, or 
        supplies.
            ``(2) Public availability.--The head of each Federal agency 
        submitting a report under paragraph (1) shall make the report 
        publicly available to the maximum extent practicable.
            ``(3) Exception for the intelligence community.--The report 
        required under this subsection shall not cover acquisitions 
        made by an agency, or component thereof, that is an element of 
        the intelligence community as specified in, or designated 
        under, section 3(4) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 
        U.S.C. 401a(4)).''.
                                 <all>
```
STATE v. JONES.

No. COA03-976.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 7, 2004.

Certification Date September 27, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Paladin Realty Income Properties, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company, certifies that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                              
|/s/ John A. Gerson                                            
|John A. Gerson                                                
|Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Director
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)                  
|November 13, 2006
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function

of the Servicer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(d)

CERTIFICATION

I, Kevin
J. Cullum, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Nissan Auto Receivables 2018-A Owner Trust
(the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am
responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the
following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National Association

Date: June 26, 2018



By:

/s/ Kevin J. CullumKevin J. CullumPresident and Chief Executive Officer ofNissan Motor Acceptance Corporation(senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 09/30/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      358,837
COMMITMENTS
  88,674  130,193   93,917  153,419  100,637  336,010  324,747   22,827   34,090

CHANGES FROM 09/23/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -30,202)
 -33,980  -44,836    2,675      987   15,998  -30,318  -26,163      116   -4,039

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    24.7     36.3     26.2     42.8     28.0     93.6     90.5      6.4      9.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      183)
      49       73       79       38       40      140      154
```

----

Updated October 3, 2014
Jamie REEP et al. v. BECK.

No. 345PA04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 21, 2004.

James Peeler Smith, Special Counsel for Beck.

Susan H. Pollitt, Raleigh, James W. Carter, for Reep.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th day of December 2004 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

> "Motion Allowed. Defendants (Beck) shall have up to and including the 24th day of January 2005 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 21st day of December 2004."
KENNETH J. HOUCK, Plaintiff, v. RANDALL AND DEBRA PEELE, Defendants.

No. COA03-1282

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed July 20, 2004

This case not for publication

Union County No. 03 CVD 622.

*Andresen, Vann & Butler, by Christopher M. Vann, for plaintiff-appellant.*

*No brief filed for defendant-appellees.*

THORNBURG, Judge.

On 1 November 2002, plaintiff Kenneth Houck and defendants Randall and Debra Peele entered into a lease agreement for property located in Waxhaw, North Carolina. Defendants agreed to pay plaintiff $2,200 per month as rent for three months and then purchase the property. Plaintiff filed a summary ejectment action against defendants on 6 March 2003 to recover rent due and to be put in possession of the property. On 1 April 2003, judgment was entered against defendants which awarded plaintiff possession of the property and a monetary award of $4,000. Defendants appealed todistrict court. Defendants failed to pay rent to the clerk of court and a writ of possession was entered on 13 May 2003.

On 30 May 2003, plaintiff moved to amend his complaint to include a claim for additional damages. Plaintiff sought to recover $12,875.00 for further overdue rent. On the same day, defendants took a voluntary dismissal and withdrew their appeal. On 1 July 2003, the trial court denied plaintiff's motion to amend. Plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion to amend. Plaintiff notes that the jurisdictional maximum in small claims court is $4,000, while in district court the maximum is $10,000. As a consequence of defendants' appeal to the district court, plaintiff argues that he was entitled to amend his complaint to seek additional damages. Plaintiff contends that the dismissal of defendants' appeal did not affect his right to seek additional damages, because he was entitled to amend his complaint and seek additional damages pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 42-34. We disagree.

Plaintiff's motion to amend his complaint was neither dispositive nor relevant to the outcome of this case. "It is well settled that `[a] Rule 41(a) dismissal strips the trial court of authority to enter further orders in the case, except as provided by Rule 41(d)[,] which authorizes the court to enter specific orders apportioning and taxing costs.'" *Brisson v. Kathy A. Santoriello, M.D., P.A.,*351 N.C. 589, 593, 528 S.E.2d 568, 570 (2000) (quoting *Walker Frames v. Shively,*123 N.C. App. 643, 646, 473 S.E.2d 776,778 (1996)). Once defendants took a voluntary dismissal, "[t]here [was] nothing the [plaintiff could] do to fan the ashes of that action into life[,] and the court [had] no role to play." *Id.* (quoting *Universidad Central Del Caribe, Inc. v. Liaison Comm. on Med. Educ.,*760 F.2d 14, 18 n.4 (1st Cir. 1985)). Accordingly, we affirm.

Affirmed.

Judges HUDSON and STEELMAN concur.

Report per Rule 30(e).
# Official Journal C 208/30 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 208 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6030 June 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 208

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6030 June 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 208/01 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 May 2017 to 31 May 2017(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) | 1 |
| 2017/C 208/02 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 May 2017 to 31 May 2017(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC) | 10 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 208/01

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 May 2017 to 31 May 2017(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

1

2017/C 208/02

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 May 2017 to 31 May 2017(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

10

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4761 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4761

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4,4'-Thiobis[2-(1,1-di-methylethyl)-
                           5-methyl-phenol].

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 17, 2007

   Mr. Ross introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on 4,4'-Thiobis[2-(1,1-di-methylethyl)-
                           5-methyl-phenol].

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 4,4'-THIOBIS[2-(1,1-DI-METHYLETHYL)-5-METHYL-PHENOL].

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902._._        4,4'-Thiobis[2-     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (1,1-di-                                                           31/2011
                         methylethyl)-5-
                         methyl-phenol]
                         (CAS No. 96-69-5)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2930.90.29)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4761 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4,4’-Thiobis[2-(1,1-di-methylethyl)–5- 

methyl-phenol]. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 17, 2007 

Mr. ROSS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4,4’-Thiobis[2-(1,1-dimethylethyl)–5-methyl-phenol]. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 4,4’-THIOBIS[2-(1,1-DI-METHYLETHYL)-5-METH4 YL-PHENOL]. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.l.l 4,4’-Thiobis[2-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-5-methyl-phenol] (CAS No. 96–69–5) 

(provided for in subheading 

2930.90.29) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4761 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4817 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4817

       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Ethoxyquin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 18, 2007

 Mr. Hulshof introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Ethoxyquin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ETHOXYQUIN.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.32 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Ethoxyquin) is amended by 
striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS I, Carl E. Vogel, the Chief Executive Officer of CCO Holdings, LLC and CCO
Holdings Capital Corp. (collectively, the Company) in compliance with 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2004 (the Report) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission:  
    
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. /s/ Carl E. VogelCarl E. VogelChief Executive OfficerAugust 13, 2004