alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
I, Paul E. Martin, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CCO Holdings, LLC and CCO Capital Corp.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrants as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants’ other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrants and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrants,including their consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) [Reserved];  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrants’ disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrants’ internal control over financialreporting that occurred during theregistrants’ most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrants’ fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrants’ internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants’ other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants’ auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrants’ board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrants’ ability to record,process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrants’internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 12, 2004 /s/ Paul E. MartinPaul E. MartinInterim Co-Chief Financial Officer(Co-Principal Financial Officer)
Mark W. CARTRET v. The Honorable Thomas V. ALDRIDGE, Jr.

No. 169P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 12, 2004.

Maynard M. Brown, Wilmington, for Mark W. Cartret.

John G. Barnwell, Assistant Attorney General, for N.C. Department of Justice.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 12th day of April 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th day of August 2004."
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant To18 U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant ToSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

##  

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Hospira, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(the “Report”), I, Christopher B. Begley, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|    /s/  Christopher B. Begley |   |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|
| Christopher  B. Begley                       |
| Chief  Executive Officer                     |
| August 11,  2005                             |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hospira, Inc.and will be retained by Hospira, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1472 

To restore the longstanding partnership between States and the Federal 

Government in managing the Medicaid program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2013 

Mr. GINGREY of Georgia (for himself, Mr. HARPER, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Mr. 

WESTMORELAND, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. ROE of Tennessee, Mr. TERRY, Mr. 

SCHOCK, and Mr. LANCE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To restore the longstanding partnership between States and 

the Federal Government in managing the Medicaid program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Flexibility Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF MEDICAID AND CHIP MAINTENANCE OF 

6 EFFORT REQUIREMENTS UNDER PPACA. 

7 (a) REPEAL OF PPACA MEDICAID MOE.—Section 

8 1902 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396a) is 

9 amended by striking subsection (gg). 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1472 IH

1 (b) REPEAL OF PPACA CHIP MOE.—Section 

2 2105(d)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

3 1397ee(d)(3)) is amended— 

4 (1) by striking subparagraph (A); 

5 (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) and 

6 (C) as subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively; and 

7 (3) in the paragraph heading, by striking 

8 ‘‘CONTINUATION OF ELIGIBILITY STANDARDS FOR

9 CHILDREN UNTIL OCTOBER 1, 2019’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘CONTINUITY OF COVERAGE’’. 

11 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

12 (1) Section 1902(a) of the Social Security Act 

13 (42 U.S.C. 1396a(a)) is amended by striking para14 graph (74). 

15 (2) Effective January 1, 2014, the paragraph 

16 (14) of section 1902(e) added by section 2002(a) of 

17 Public Law 111–148 is amended by striking the 

18 third sentence of subparagraph (A). 

19 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Except as provided in sub20 section (c)(2), the amendments made by this section shall 

21 take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# Official Journal C 65/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.065.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 65 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5316 March 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.065.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 65

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5316 March 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2010/C 065/01 | List of natural mineral waters recognised by Member States (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2010/C 065/01

List of natural mineral waters recognised by Member States (1)

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
HARPER EX REL. WIGGINS v. DOLL

No. COA04-475.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 1, 2005.

Certification Date March 21, 2005.

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
IN THE MATTER OF: D.M.R.

No. COA04-253

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 19, 2004.

This case not for publication

Mecklenburg County, No. 03 J 355.

*Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General Myra L. Griffin, for the State.*

*David J.P. Barber for respondent-appellant.*

LEVINSON, Judge.

On 8 October 2003, juvenile respondent D.M.R. filed notice of appeal from an adjudication of delinquency announced in open court on 1 October 2003, and filed by the district court judge on 9 October 2003. The adjudication order continued disposition in this cause until 21 November 2003.

Under N.C.G.S. § 7B-2602(3) (2003), a juvenile may appeal "[a]ny order of disposition after an adjudication that a juvenile is delinquent or undisciplined[.]" This statute does not authorize an appeal following the adjudicatory portion of the case. *Accord In re Pegram,*137 N.C. App. 382, 383, 527 S.E.2d 737, 738 (2000) (applying N.C.G.S. §7A-666 of the former N.C. Juvenile Code in the dependency context). Accordingly, this appeal must be Dismissed.

Judges TIMMONS-GOODSON and CALABRIA concur.

Report per Rule 30(e).
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4866 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Synthetic indigo powder, 

(3H-indol-3-one, 2-(1,3-dihydro-3-oxo-2H-indol-2-ylidene)-1,2-dihydro-). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2007 

Mr. CLAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Synthetic 

indigo powder, (3H-indol-3-one, 2-(1,3-dihydro-3-oxo-2Hindol-2-ylidene)-1,2-dihydro-). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SYNTHETIC INDIGO POWDER, (3H-INDOL-3-ONE, 

4 2-(1,3-DIHYDRO-3-OXO-2H-INDOL-2-YLIDENE)- 

5 1,2-DIHYDRO-). 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.66 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended 

8 by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4866 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 MARCH 19, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

 Honorable B. Avant Edenfield, United States District Judge for the Southern District of *

Georgia, sitting by designation.

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 07-13176

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 05-03248-CV-TCB-1

NATIONWIDE-SOUTHEAST, INC., 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

versus 

AMERICAN INTERSTATE INSURANCE CO., 

Defendant-Appellee. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

_________________________

(March 19, 2008)

Before HULL and WILSON, Circuit Judges, and EDENFIELD, District Judge. *

PER CURIAM:
2

After review and oral argument, we affirm the district court’s June 18, 2007

order granting summary judgment to defendant American Interstate Insurance Co.

(“American Interstate”). Nationwide-Southeast’s (“Nationwide”) claims are barred

by the doctrine of res judicata, as they were compulsory counterclaims in

American Interstate’s 2004 state action to recover premiums. See Johnson v. First

Carolina Fin. Corp., 200 Ga. App. 340, 341, 408 S.E.2d 151, 153 (1991) (finding

that res judicata bars the filing of claims which should have been pled as

compulsory counterclaims in a prior suit). The claims brought by Nationwide in

this action are “logically related” to the claims asserted in American Interstate’s

2004 action, and arise out of the same “transaction or occurrence.” See P & J

Truck Lines, Inc. v. Canal Ins. Co., 148 Ga. App. 3, 4, 251 S.E.2d 72, 73 (1978);

Ga. Code Ann. § 9-11-13(a) (providing that a counterclaim is compulsory “if it

arises out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the opposing

party’s claim. . . .”); Allstate Ins. Co. v. Welch, 259 Ga. App. 71, 73, 576 S.E.2d

57, 59 (2003) (“Any claim that is logically related to another claim that is being

sued on is properly the basis for a compulsory counterclaim.”).

AFFIRMED.
STATE v. Scott David ALLEN.

No. 115A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 3, 2005.

William N. Farrell, Special Deputy Attorney General, Robert C. Montgomery, Assistant Attorney General, Garland N. Yates, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd day of March 2005 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion for Extension is Allowed. Defendant (Scott David Allen) shall have up to and including the 8th day of April 2005 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of March 2005."
| (logo) WELLS

            FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certainPooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2018, by and among J.P.Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., as Depositor, Wells FargoBank, National Association, as Master Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as SpecialServicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator,Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, and Pentalpha SurveillanceLLC, as Operating Advisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer, with respectto Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2018-C8 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of thisAgreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Servicesdo hereby certify that:

 

1.           A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from June1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision,and 

 

2.           To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/LeslieHayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 20

- 00571

- CV

IN RE D ’ SPAIN CONSTRUCTION L.L.C.

No. 04

- 20

- 00574

- CV

IN RE Rowena KNEUPPER
Original Mandamus Proceeding s 1

PER CURIAM
Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez , Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 17, 2021

PETITION S FOR WRIT S OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED AS MOOT

On November 30, 2020, Relators filed petition s for writ s of mandamus and requested stay s
of discovery order s pending final resolution s of the ir petitions. We granted the stay s and requested

response s . Based on the responses, we abate d th ese proceeding s to allow the trial court to amend
or vacate its discovery orders

. On February 3, 2021, Relators notified this court that the trial court effectively rescinded
its discovery orders
, and Relators asked this court to dismiss their petitions as moot.

1 Th e s e proceeding s arise out of Cause No. 20

- 274 , styled D’Spain Construction L.L.C. v. George Samuel Ludolf, Individually and as Owner/Manager of GSL Ranch LLC a/k/a GSL Ranch; et al. , pending in the 451st Judicial District Court
, Kendall County, Texas, the Honorable Kirsten Cohoon presiding.04

- 20

- 00571

- CV & 04

- 20

- 00574

- CV

- 2

- Relators’ requests are granted. The stay s imposed on December 1, 2020, a re lifted.

Relators’ petitions for writs of mandamus are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 6, 2016

Order 

May 6, 2016

153094(48)

MOTOR CITY PAWN BROKERS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

CITY OF WARREN,

Defendant-Appellee.

SC: 153094

COA: 322459

Macomb CC: 12-002472-CZ

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the National Pawnbrokers Association 

to participate as amicus curiae and to file an amicus curiae brief is GRANTED. The 

amicus brief submitted on April 13, 2016, is accepted for filing.
BUTLER v. E.I. DuPONT DE NEMOURS & CO.

COA03-1078.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 3, 2004.

Certification Date August 23, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE v. TAYLOR.

No. COA03-349.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 6, 2004.

Certification Date July 26, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Paladin Realty Income Properties, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Board of Directors of the Company, certifies that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ James R. Worms                             
|James R. Worms                                 
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|(Principal Executive Officer)                  

May 15, 2007
STATE v. GRAY

No. COA03-1436.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 5, 2004.

Certification Date October 25, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
Exhibit 21.1

List of Subsidiaries

Biometrica Systems, Inc. (a NH Corp.)

IBT Acquisition, LLC (a DE LLC)
Integrated Biometric Technology LLC (a FL LLC)

Imaging Automation, Inc. (a DE Corp.)
Imaging Automation Argentina SRL (an Argentina partnership) (99.98% owned)
Imaging Automation LLC (a DE LLC)
Caroline Corporation, N.V. Netherland Antilles

Viisage Technology AG (a German Corp.)

Trans Digital Technologies Corporation (a DE Corp.)
Trans Digital Technologies LLC (a DE Corp.)

SecuriMetrics, Inc. (a CA Corp.)

6653371 CANADA INC. (Canadian Corporation)
COMNETIX INC. (Canadian Corporation)

Identix Incorporated (a DE Corp.)
Identix Advance Projects, LLC (a VA LLC)
Visionics Corporation (a DE Corp.)
Visionics Technology Corporation (a NJ Corp.)
Identix Ltd. (a United Kingdom Corp.)
Identicator Technology, Inc. (a DE Corp.)
Identix International, Inc. (a CA Corp.)
Identix Australia Pty Ltd. (New South Wales, Australia)
Identix Identification Services (a DE LLC)

SpecTal, LLC (a VA LLC)

Iridian Technologies, Inc. (a DE Corp.)
Iridian Technologies S.A. (a Swiss Entity)
Sensar, Inc. (a DE Corp.)

Advanced Concepts, Inc. (a MD Corp.)

McClendon LLC (a VA Corp.)

All the subsidiaries are 100% owned except as indicated

---
EXHIBIT 32

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         The undersigned, John M. Sharpe, Jr., hereby certifies as follows:

         1. I am the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of
Inner Systems, Inc. (the "Company").

         2. To the best of my knowledge, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the "Report") complies in all
material respects with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

         3. To the best of my knowledge based upon a review of the Report, the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period
audited.


      SIGNATURE                             TITLE                       DATE


/s/ John M. Sharpe, Jr.         President, Chief Executive          May 14, 2008
-----------------------         Officer and Chief Financial
JOHN M. SHARPE, JR.             Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to INNER SYSTEMS, INC. and will be retained by INNER SYSTEMS, INC. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4867 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2,5-Bis[(1,3- 

dioxobutyl)amino]benzenesulfonic acid. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2007 

Mr. CLAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2,5-Bis[(1,3- 

dioxobutyl)amino]benzenesulfonic acid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2,5-BIS[(1,3- 

4 DIOXOBUTYL)AMINO]BENZENESULFONIC 

5 ACID. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.39 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended 

8 by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4867 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Cody ROSS, Petitioner v. Johnnie ROCHELL, Jr.

No. 19-263

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
HILL EX REL. HILL v. WEST

No. COA04-160

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed February 15, 2005

Certification Date March 7, 2005

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
NORTHCROSS LAND AND DEVELOPMENT, L.P. v. LAKE NORMAN CASTALDI'S INC.

No. 114P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 29, 2004.

Henry N. Pharr, III, Charlotte, for Lake Norman Castaldi's, Inc.

*471John H. Capitano, Amy P. Williams, Charlotte, for Northcross Land and Development.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 17th day of March 2004 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2004."
In the Matter of F.M.L.W., F.J.S. appealed by Respondent, Michelle Smith.

No. 66P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 3, 2005.

Terry F. Rose, Smithfield, for Michelle Smith.

Patricia K. Gibbons, for Guardian Ad Litem.

Corrine G. Russell, for Wake County Human Resources.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Respondent (Michelle Smith) on the 25th day of January 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of March 2005."