alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 482

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to transfer ownership 

of the American River Pump Station Project, and for 

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 482 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American River Pump 

3 Station Project Transfer Act of 2007’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER. 

5 The Secretary of the Interior (hereafter in this Act 

6 referred to as the ‘‘Secretary’’) shall transfer ownership 

7 of the American River Pump Station Project located at 

8 Auburn, California, which includes the Pumping Plant, as9 sociated facilities, and easements necessary for permanent 

10 operation of the facilities, to the Placer County Water 

11 Agency, in accordance with the terms of Contract No. 02–

12 LC–20–7790 between the United States and Placer Coun13 ty Water Agency and the terms and conditions established 

14 in this Act. 

15 SEC. 3. FEDERAL COSTS NONREIMBURSABLE. 

16 Federal costs associated with construction of the 

17 American River Pump Station Project located at Auburn, 

18 California, are nonreimbursable. 

19 SEC. 4. GRANT OF REAL PROPERTY INTEREST. 

20 The Secretary is authorized to grant title to Placer 

21 County Water Agency as provided in section 2 in full satis22 faction of the United States’ obligations under Land Pur23 chase Contract 14–06–859–308 to provide a water supply 

24 to the Placer County Water Agency. 
3

•HR 482 EH

1 SEC. 5. COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Before conveying land and facili3 ties pursuant to this Act, the Secretary shall comply with 

4 all applicable requirements under—

5 (1) the National Environmental Policy Act of 

6 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.); 

7 (2) the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 

8 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.); and 

9 (3) any other law applicable to the land and fa10 cilities. 

11 (b) EFFECT.—Nothing in this Act modifies or alters 

12 any obligations under—

13 (1) the National Environmental Policy Act of 

14 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.); or 

15 (2) the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 

16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). 

17 SEC. 6. RELEASE FROM LIABILITY. 

18 Effective on the date of transfer to the Placer County 

19 Water Agency of any land or facility under this Act, the 

20 United States shall not be liable for damages arising out 

21 of any act, omission, or occurrence relating to the land 

22 and facilities, consistent with Article 9 of Contract No. 
4

•HR 482 EH

1 02–LC–20–7790 between the United States and Placer 

2 County Water Agency. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 7, 

2007. 

Attest:

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 482

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to transfer 

Project, and for other purposes.ownership of the American River Pump Station
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1459 

To ensure that the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 applies to 

the declaration of national monuments, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2013 

Mr. BISHOP of Utah (for himself, Mr. GOSAR, Mr. CHAFFETZ, Mr. WALDEN, 

Mr. PEARCE, Mrs. LUMMIS, Mr. AMODEI, and Mr. STEWART) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To ensure that the National Environmental Policy Act of 

1969 applies to the declaration of national monuments, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Public In5 volvement in the Creation of National Monuments Act’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1459 IH

1 SEC. 2. NEPA APPLICABILITY TO NATIONAL MONUMENT 

2 DECLARATIONS. 

3 Section 2 of the Act of June 8, 1906 (16 U.S.C. 431; 

4 commonly known as the ‘‘Antiquities Act of 1906’’) is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘That the President’’ and in7 serting the following: 

8 ‘‘(a) That the President’’; 

9 (2) by striking ‘‘discretion, to declare’’ and in10 serting ‘‘discretion, subject to the National Environ11 mental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), 

12 to declare’’; 

13 (3) by inserting before the final period the fol14 lowing ‘‘. No more than one declaration shall be 

15 made in a State during any presidential four-year 

16 term of office without an express Act of Congress’’; 

17 and 

18 (4) by adding at the end the following: 

19 ‘‘(b) A declaration under this section shall— 

20 ‘‘(1) not include private property without the 

21 informed written consent of the owner of the private 

22 property affected by the declaration; 

23 ‘‘(2) be considered a major Federal action 

24 under the National Environmental Policy Act of 

25 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), if it affects more 

26 than 5,000 acres; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1459 IH

1 ‘‘(3) be categorically excluded under the Na2 tional Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 

3 4321 et seq.) and expire three years after the date 

4 of the declaration (unless specifically designated as 

5 a monument by Federal law), if it affects 5,000 

6 acres or less; and 

7 ‘‘(4) be followed by a feasibility study that in8 cludes an estimate of the costs associated with man9 aging the monument in perpetuity, including any 

10 loss of Federal and State revenue, which shall be 

11 submitted to the Committee on Natural Resources of 

12 the House of Representatives and the Committee on 

13 Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and 

14 made available on the website of the Department of 

15 the Interior not later than one year after the date 

16 of the declaration.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
NOYOLA v. HYTROL CONVEYOR CO., INC.

No. COA03-427.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 5, 2004.

Certification Date October 25, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Exhibit
32.1







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the quarterly report of Upstream Worldwide, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Douglas Feirstein, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:





1.
              The
      quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and





2.
              The
      information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.





/s/
Douglas Feirstein
 Douglas
Feirstein
 Chief
Executive Officer
 (Principal
Executive Officer)


Dated:
August 20, 2010








In
connection with the quarterly report of Upstream Worldwide, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Daniel Brauser, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:





1.
              The
      quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and





2.
              The
      information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.






/s/
Daniel Brauser


Daniel
Brauser
 Chief
Financial Officer
 (Principal
Financial Officer)
 Dated:
August 20, 2010
STATE v. FISHER

No. COA04-123.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 7, 2004.

Certification Date December 28, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
Exhibit 4.2


 


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated July 24, 2019, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 1952 contained in Amendment No.
1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-230875) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned
report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


July 24, 2019
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4877 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4877

     To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Amino-3-Cyano Thiophene.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 19, 2007

   Mr. Clay introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Amino-3-Cyano Thiophene.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-AMINO-3-CYANO THIOPHENE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902._._        2-Amino-3-Cyano     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Thiophene (CAS                                                     31/2011
                         No. 4651-82-5)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2934.99.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
STATE v. MATTHEWS.

No. COA03-1354.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 7, 2004.

Certification Date September 27, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
SMITH BARNEY MUNICIPAL FUND, INC.
                        10f-3 REPORT
           January 1, 1997 through April 30, 1997
                              
                                                  % of
Trade     Selling             Par       Purchase  Fund % of
Issuer              Date Dealer         Amount
Price          Assets    Issue

Puerto Rico Muni Fin. Ag.     4/11/97   Morgan Stanley
$1,000,000     $95.744        1.64%     2.18%
5.50% due 7/1/2021

Oregon Dept. of Admin.   4/17/97   Bear Stearns   500,000
97.995         0.80 1.29
5.80% due 5/1/2024

Oregon St. Hsg. & Comm.  4/30/97   Bear Stearns   500,000
100.00         0.81 3.36
6.20% due 7/1/2027
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of Green  Mt.  Labs.,  Inc.(the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending March 31, 2004,  as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Geoff Williams,  Principal Accounting Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C.  Sec. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Sec. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.


/s/ Geoff Williams
-------------------------------
Geoff Williams
Principal Accounting Officer
May 12, 2004

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
     other document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the
     signature that appears in typed form within the electronic  version of this
     written  statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
     the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its
     staff upon  request.  The foregoing  certifications  are  accompanying  the
     Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
     Act of 2002  (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of title
     18,  United  States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB
     or as a separate disclosure document.
K. N., et ux., Petitioners v. MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

No. 19-6191

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Montana denied.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1473 

To prevent certain Federal health care laws from establishing health care 

provider standards of care in medical malpractice cases, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2013 

Mr. GINGREY of Georgia (for himself and Mr. CUELLAR) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period 

to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To prevent certain Federal health care laws from establishing 

health care provider standards of care in medical malpractice cases, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Standard of Care Pro5 tection Act of 2013’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1473 IH

1 SEC. 2. CONSTRUCTION REGARDING HEALTH CARE PRO2 VIDER STANDARDS OF CARE. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The development, recognition, or 

4 implementation of any guideline or other standard under 

5 any Federal health care provision shall not be construed 

6 to establish the standard of care or duty of care owed by 

7 a health care provider to a patient in any medical mal8 practice case. 

9 (b) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this Act: 

10 (1) The term ‘‘Federal health care provision’’ 

11 means any provision of the Patient Protection and 

12 Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111–148) and the 

13 amendments made by that Act, and titles XVIII and 

14 XIX of the Social Security Act. 

15 (2) The term ‘‘medical malpractice case’’ means 

16 a medical malpractice action or claim (as defined in 

17 section 431(7) of the Health Care Quality Improve18 ment Act of 1986 (42 U.S.C. 11151(7))). 

19 (3) The term ‘‘State’’ includes the District of 

20 Columbia, Puerto Rico, and any other common21 wealth, possession, or territory of the United States. 

22 (c) NO PREEMPTION.—No provision of the Patient 

23 Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111– 

24 148) or the amendments made by that Act shall be conVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:34 Apr 17, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1473.IH H1473

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1473 IH

1 strued to preempt any State law governing medical profes2 sional liability cases. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Jeffrey G. THOMAS, Petitioner v. Norman SOLOMON, et al.

No. 19-537

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Municipal High Income Fund Inc.:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements 
of Municipal High Income Fund Inc. (the "Fund") for the year 
ended October 31, 1998, we considered its internal control, 
including control activities for safeguarding securities, in 
order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of 
expressing our opinion on the financial statements and to comply 
with the requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on 
the internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and 
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility, 
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the 
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally, 
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's 
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes 
that are fairly presented in conformity with generally accepted 
accounting principles. Those controls include the safeguarding of 
assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition. 

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, error or 
fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any 
evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to 
the risk that it may become inadequate because of changes in 
conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation 
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily 
disclose all matters in internal control that might be material 
weaknesses under standards established by the American Institute 
of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness is a 
condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the 
internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low 
level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in 
amounts that would be material in relation to the financial 
statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a 
timely period by employees in the normal course of performing 
their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters involving 
internal control and its operation, including controls for 
safeguarding securities that we consider to be material 
weaknesses as defined above. 

This report is intended solely for the information and use of 
management, the Board of Directors of the Fund, and the 
Securities and Exchange Commission.



December 8, 1998
|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (a) | A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from May 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 has been made under my supervision. |

|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (b) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period. |

|                                                                                                                           |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                           |
| /s/ Ryan M. Hershberger                                                                                                   |
| Ryan M. HershbergerAssistant Treasurer ofFord Motor Credit Company LLC,as Servicer of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2018-A |
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4795 

To extend the suspension of duty on mixtures of difenoconazole and 

mefenoxam. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 18, 2007 

Mr. COBLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on mixtures of 

difenoconazole and mefenoxam. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF DIFENOCONAZOLE AND 

4 MEFENOXAM. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.12.53 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 mixtures of difenoconazole and mefenoxam) is amended 

8 by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and by inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4795 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4769 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4769

       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on ice shavers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 17, 2007

Mr. Scott of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on ice shavers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ICE SHAVERS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.41 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
STATE of North Carolina v. Eddie HATCHER.

No. 123P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 1, 2004.

Eddie Hatcher, Pro Se.

Ellen B. Scouten, Assistant Attorney General, L. Johnson Britt, III, District Attorney, for State.

Prior report: 156 N.C.App. 391, 576 S.E.2d 704.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 17th day of March 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of April 2004."