alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-2 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and
represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of
May 23, 2018, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-2 and Wilmington Trust, National Association (the Agreement) during the
period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By:

/s/ Sandra M. BroderickName:

Sandra M. BroderickTitle:

EVP Head of OperationsDate:

March 29, 2019By:

/s/ Andrew KangName:

Andrew KangTitle:

TreasurerDate:

March 29, 2019
#### JEROME A. BLANCHARD v. C. A. SMITH LUMBER COMPANY.1

July 23, 1909.

Nos. 16,189—(152).

Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $2,000 for personal injuries sustained by the minor son of plaintiff while employed in defendant’s factory in operating a certain rip saw. The ease was tried before Frederick Y. Brown, J., and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $1,000. From an order denying defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, it appealed.

Affirmed.

*Keith, Evans, Thompson*c6 *Fairchild,*for appellant.

*James E. Markham*and *Benjamin Calmenson,*for respondent.

1

 Reported in 122 N. W. 1134.

Pee Ctjbiam.

In this action to recover damages for personal injuries the plaintiff recovered a verdict of $1,000, and the defendant appealed from an order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

*538We find nothing in this record but questions of fact and the application thereto of well established rules of law.

The action was brought by the plaintiff on behalf of his minor son who was injured while operating a rip saw for the appellant in its box factory. He was a young man about eighteen years of age, but had had considerable experience in this line of work. He had operated the particular saw upon which he was injured for about two hours before he was injured. While engaged in pushing a piece of wood through the saw, the wood was in some manner clinched by the saw and carried upward so that the operator’s hand slipped beneath the wood and came in contact with the saw. The complaint alleged that the saw upon which the young man was injured was worn, defective, and unfit for use; that the ends of the journal to which the saw was attached were worn, uneven and untrue; that the boxes in which the journal rested were worn, loose and defective so that it was loose, shifty and wobbly in its bearings; that the saw revolved while in operation in an unsteady, uneven .motion so that the lumber that was being fed into it was liable at any time to be caught by the irregular motion of the saw and thrown so that there was great danger that the hands of the operator would be thrown against the saw.

The condition of the saw, the contributory negligence of the injured man, and the question of whether he assumed the risks involved in the work, were, upon the evidence in this case, all questions for the jury. An extended discussion of the evidence would be useless. We have *examined the*record very carefully and *are*convinced that the order of the trial court was correct.

Order affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 117 (Friday, June 17, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36567-36568]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13032]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #17487 and #17488; NEW MEXICO Disaster Number NM-
00081]


Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of New Mexico

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of New Mexico (FEMA-
4652-DR), dated 06/08/2022.

[[Page 36568]]

    Incident: Wildfires and Straight-line Winds.
    Incident Period: 04/05/2022 and continuing.

DATES: Issued on 06/08/2022.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 08/08/2022.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 03/08/2023.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 06/08/2022, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Colfax, Mora, San Miguel.
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere...      1.875
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      1.875
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      1.875
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17487 5 
and for economic injury is 17488 0.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Joshua Barnes,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2022-13032 Filed 6-16-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
STATE of North Carolina v. Nathan Lewis BROWN.

No. 634P03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 24, 2004.

James N. Freeman, Jr., for Nathan Lewis Brown.

Scott K. Beaver, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th day of December 2003 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."
Independent Auditors' Report


To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
Smith Barney Investment Series:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements of
the Smith Barney Growth and Income Fund of Smith Barney Investment
Series (the Fund) for the year ended October 31, 2001, we considered
its internal control, including control activities for safeguarding
securities, in order to determine our auditing procedures for the
purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and to
comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance
on the internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally, controls
that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's objective of
preparing financial statements for external purposes that are fairly
presented in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those controls include the
safeguarding of assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or
disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or fraud
may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any evaluation of
internal control to future periods is subject to the risk that it may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the
effectiveness of the design and operation may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in the internal control that might be material
weaknesses under standards established by the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness is a condition in
which the design or operation of one or more of the internal control
components does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that
misstatements caused by error or fraud in amounts that would be
material in relation to the financial statements being audited may
occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the
normal course of performing their assigned functions.  However, we
noted no matters involving the internal control and its operation,
including controls for safeguarding securities that we consider to be
material weaknesses as defined above as of October 31, 2001.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management, the Board of Trustees of the Fund, and the Securities and
Exchange Commission and is not intended to be and should not be used
by anyone other than these specified parties.


New York, New York
December 12, 2001
### The Honorable John B. Jones, United State s District Judge for 1 

### the District of South Dakota. ___________ No. 95-2895

___________ Patrick Barnett, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Joe Class, Warden, South Dakota * Penitentiary; Lt. Young, * employed at South Dakota State * Appeal from the United States Penitentiary as guard; Lt. * District Court for the Ditiston, employed at South * District of South Dakota. Dakota State Penitentiary as * guard; Sgt. Baker, employed at * [UNPUBLISHED] South Dakota State Penitentiary * as guard; Officer Nuterton, * employed at South Dakota State * Penitentiary as guard; Lynne * Delano, Sec. for SDSP located * in Pierre, SD; Major Severson; * Jim Ross; Prison Health Services,* *

Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: December 17, 1996 Filed: January 3, 1997

___________ Before BEAM, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
PatrickBarnett appeals from the district court's grant of summary 1 judgment to defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 a ction, in which he claimed prim arilythat defendants were deliberately indifferent to his seriou s medical needs and used excessive force

### -2-

against him. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs , we conc lude the district court correctly entered judgment in favor o f defendants. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We den y Barnett's motion to supplement the record on appeal, as the document h e wished to submit was already a part of the record.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4938 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on child carriers, chain tension 

adjustors, chain covers, and certain other articles designed for use on bicycles. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 15, 2008 

Mr. BLUMENAUER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on child carriers, 

chain tension adjustors, chain covers, and certain other 

articles designed for use on bicycles. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CHILD CARRIERS, CHAIN TENSION ADJUSTORS, 

4 CHAIN COVERS, AND CERTAIN OTHER ARTI5 CLES DESIGNED FOR USE ON BICYCLES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.24.66 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 child carriers, chain tension adjustors, chain covers, and 

9 certain other articles designed for use on bicycles) is 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4938 IH

1 amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

2 2011’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

5 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
STATE v. RUSSELL.

No. COA03-424.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 7, 2004.

Certification Date September 27, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
alv-ex103_484.htm





 

Exhibit 10.3

Supplement to Employment Agreement

June 20, 2019

This SUPPLEMENT is made to the employment agreement (the “Agreement”) by and between Autoliv, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Daniel Garceau (the “Executive”), that was entered on March 21, 2018.


	
1.
	
 Section 2 of the the Agreement will be changed as follows:




Employment.  The Executive is hereby employed on the Effective Date as the President, Americas of the Company.  In this capacity, the Executive shall have the duties, responsibilities and authority commensurate with such position as shall be assigned to him by the Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company (the “Chief Executive Officer”). The principal workplace for the Executive shall be Ogden Utah, United States. 


	
2.
	
 The change made to Section 2 above will not constitute a Good Reason upon signing this supplement to the Agreement as defined in Article 10-(c)-(iii) of the Agreement.





	
3.
	
 Article 10-(c)-(iii) of the Agreement will be changed as follows:




(iii) the relocation of the Executive’s principal place of employment by the Company to a location more than 30 miles from the Executive’s any of the principal places of employment mentioned in Section 2, as modified with this Supplement to Employment Agreement, except for required travel on the Company’s business to an extent substantially consistent with the Executive’s present business travel obligations;


	
4.
	
Other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement remain unchanged. 




IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Supplement has been executed the day and year first above written.

AUTOLIV, INC

 


	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Sherry Vasa
	
 
	
Daniel Garceau

	
EVP Human Resources & Sustainability
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 485 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 485

   To amend the Small Tracts Act to facilitate the exchange of small 
                tracts of land, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 16, 2007

Mr. Doolittle introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
  Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on 
Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Small Tracts Act to facilitate the exchange of small 
                tracts of land, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Tracts Reform Act''.

SEC. 2. FACILITATION OF EXCHANGE OF SMALL TRACTS.

    (a) Expansion of Availability of Lands for Sale or Exchange.--
Section 3 of Public Law 97-465 (16 U.S.C. 521e; section 3 of the Act 
commonly known as the Small Tracts Act) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``not practicable'' and inserting ``either 
        not practicable or not expedient'';
            (2) by striking ``, which have a value as determined by the 
        Secretary of not more than $150,000,''; and
            (3) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) by striking ``parcels of forty acres'' and 
                inserting ``parcels or portions of parcels of 100 
                acres''; and
                    (B) by striking ``under the mining laws''.
    (b) Rules or Regulations Not Required.--Nothing in the amendments 
made by this section shall require the Forest Service to issue rules or 
regulations prior to any sale, exchange, or interchange under Public 
Law 97-465 (16 U.S.C. 521c et seq.).
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4925 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4925

      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Fluorobenzene.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 19, 2007

  Mr. Spratt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Fluorobenzene.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FLUOROBENZENE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.03.05 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Fluorobenzene) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit
      10.1**




October
      31, 2005





Mr.
      Robert Coords


Executive
      Vice President


AIG
      Re


70
      Pine
      Street, 40 th Floor


New
      York,
      NY 10270





Re:
            Agreement
                to terminate and commute the Quota Share Reinsurance Contract by
                and among
                National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA and Coast
                National
                Insurance Company, Security National Insurance Company, Bristol West
                Insurance Company and Bristol West Casualty Insurance
                Company




Dear
      Bob:





Reference
      is made to the Quota Share Reinsurance Contract effective as of January 1,
      2005,
      by and among National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA
      (hereinafter referred to as the “Subscribing Reinsurer”) and Coast National
      Insurance Company, Security National Insurance Company, Bristol West Insurance
      Company and Bristol West Casualty Insurance Company (hereinafter together
      referred to as the “Subscribing Company”) as amended to the date hereof (the
“Quota Share Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall
      have the same meanings herein as set forth in the Quota Share
      Agreement.





Provided
      the parties to the Quota Share Agreement have executed a commutation agreement,
      and all conditions to effectiveness set forth therein have been satisfied on
      or
      before January 7, 2006, the Subscribing Reinsurer and the Subscribing Company
      hereby mutually agree to terminate the Quota Share Agreement on a cut-off basis
      effective January 1, 2006, and the Subscribing Reinsurer hereby agrees to pay
      to
      the Subscribing Company the Profit Commission described in Article IX of the
      Quota Share Agreement not later than January 31, 2006.





The
      execution, delivery and performance of this letter agreement shall not, except
      as expressly provided herein, constitute a waiver of any provision of, or
      operate as a wavier of any right, power or remedy of the Subscribing Company
      under the Quota Share Agreement.





**On
      behalf of the Subscribing Company,**


**Coast
      National Insurance Company,**


**Security
      National Insurance Company,**


**Bristol
      West Insurance Company,**


**Bristol
      West Casualty Insurance Company**





/s/
      CRAIG EISENACHER


**Name:**
      Craig Eisenacher


**Title:**Treasurer




**Acknowledged
      and Agreed:**





**On
      behalf of the Subscribing Reinsurer,**


**National
      Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA.**





/s/
      ROBERT J COORDS


**Name:**
      Robert J. Coords


**Title:**
      Attorney - In - Fact
**Exhibit 32**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Bristol West Holdings, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), we, James R. Fisher and Craig E. Eisenacher, Chief Executive Officer
      and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






November
      14, 2005




/s/  JAMES
                R. FISHER
            
            /s/  CRAIG
                E. EISENACHERJames
                R. Fisher
            
            Craig
                E. EisenacherChairman
                and Chief Executive Officer
            
            Senior
                Vice President and Chief Financial
                Officer