alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit










FORESCOUT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
AMENDMENT  TO THE FORESCOUT TECHNOLOGIES, INC EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 


This Amendment  to the Forescout Technologies, Inc. Employment Agreement (“Amendment ”) is made and entered into as of January 1, 2019 (“Effective Date”) by and between Forescout Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation having its principal offices at 190 West Tasman Drive, San Jose, CA 95134 (“Forescout”) and Pedro Abreu, having his principal offices at 190 West Tasman Drive, San Jose, CA 95134 (“Pedro Abreu”). Forescout and Pedro Abreu are collectively or individually referred to herein as “Party” or “Parties,” as applicable. 


WHEREAS, the Parties entered into the Forescout Technologies, Inc. Employment Agreement on January 1, 2017 in which Pedro Abreu agreed to continue employment with Forescout pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, as may have been amended, amended and restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time in accordance with its provisions (collectively, the “Agreement”). All capitalized terms used herein but not defined shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement;


WHEREAS, Forescout and Pedro Abreu desire to amend Mr. Abreu’s title to Senior Vice President, Chief Product and Strategy Officer.


NOW THEREFORE, the Parties now agree to amend the Agreement as follows:


		
	1.
	In Section 1.2.1, Executive Position, the following language:




As of the Effective Date, Executive agrees to serve as Senior Vice President, Chief Strategy Officer of the Company, under the terms of this Agreement. 


shall be replaced with
 
As of the Effective Date, Executive agrees to serve as Senior Vice President, Chief Product and Strategy Officer of the Company, under the terms of this Agreement. 




		
	2.
	In the case of a direct conflict between the terms contained in this Amendment  and the Agreement, the applicable terms of this Amendment  shall prevail. 




		
	3.
	Except as specifically modified and amended herein, all of the terms and conditions contained in the Agreement remain in full force and effect. 




		
	4.
	This Amendment , together with the Agreement, constitute the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements, understandings and negotiations, both written and oral, between the Parties with respect to the subject matter contained in this Amendment . No waiver, amendment, or modification of any provision of this Amendment  shall be enforceable against the Parties unless it is in writing and signed by the Parties.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment  as of the Effective Date by their duly authorized representatives.






Forescout Confidential        Page 1 of 1
Forescout Amendment Std 6.23.16









	
		
	Forescout Technologies, Inc.
By: /s/ Darren Milliken   
Name:  Darren Milliken
Title: SVP, General Counsel   
	Pedro Abreu
By: /s/ Pedro Abreu
Name: Pedro Abreu
Title: SVP, Chief Product and Strategy Officer

	Date: May 24, 2019


	Date: May 24, 2019



	 
	 










Forescout Confidential        Page 2 of 2
Forescout Amendment Std 6.23.16
(function ($, Drupal, once) {
  Drupal.behaviors.cdcnpin_megamenu = {
    attach: function (context, settings) {
      once('npin_chop_megamenu', '#block-mainmenu .tbm-submenu', context).forEach(function (element) {
        if ($('.tbm-column', element).length === 3) {
          $(element).addClass('submenu-wide');
          $('.tbm-column:nth-child(1)', element).find('ul.menu li:gt(5)').remove();
          $('.tbm-column:nth-child(2)', element).find('ul.menu li:lt(6)').remove();
        }
      });
    }
  }
})(jQuery, Drupal, once);
Exhibit 32.2CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     I, Erin E. West, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of ProCentury Corporation (the“Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2007 whichthis certification accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Erin E. West   Erin E. West  Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer  August 3, 2007  
43
<PAGE>

                               EXHIBIT (3)(b)(3)
<PAGE>

                           EMERALD ISLE BANCORP, INC.

                           Second Amendment to By-Laws

      At the meeting of January 22, 1997, the Board of Directors of the
Corporation

      VOTED:      To amend the first sentence of Article III, Section 1 of the
                  By-Laws of the Corporation to change the date of the annual
                  meeting of stockholders from the third Monday in April to the
                  last Monday in April as follows:

                  "The annual meeting of stockholders shall be held on the last
                  Monday in April in each year (or if that be a legal holiday in
                  the place where the meeting is to be held, on the next
                  succeeding full business day ) at 10:00 a.m. at the main
                  office of the Corporation in Massachusetts, unless a different
                  hour, date or place within Massachusetts (or, if permitted by
                  law, elsewhere in the United States) is fixed by the Chairman
                  of the Board, if one is elected, the Vice Chairman, if one is
                  elected, or the Board of Directors acting by vote or by
                  written instrument or instruments signed by them."
Kevin M. MERCK, Petitioner, v. MINNESOTA SUPREME COURT, et al.

No. 19-6744

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Robert CHIN, Petitioner v. Mark CAPOZZA, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Fayette, et al.

No. 19-6391

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
STATE of North Carolina v. Michael Jerome RICHARDSON.

No. 67P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 3, 2005.

Michael Jerome Richardson, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Thomas H. Lock, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 25th day of January 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Johnston County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of February 2005."
conferred upon that party shall automatically extend to and be vested in such transferee orassignee, all subject to the terms and conditions hereof. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if any ofthe undersigned Guarantors satisfies the provisions of Section 11.03 of the Indenture, it shallautomatically be released of its obligations hereunder without the necessity of any action beingtaken by any Person and regardless of whether this Guarantee is amended to reflect such release.This is a Guarantee of payment and not a guarantee of collection.     For purposes hereof, each the undersigned Guarantors’ liability shall be that amount from timeto time equal to the aggregate liability of such Guarantor under this Note Guarantee, but shall belimited to the lesser of (a) the aggregate amount of the obligations of the Issuer under the Notesand the Indenture and (b) the amount, if any, which would not have (A) rendered such Guarantor"*insolvent*” (as such term is defined in the federal Bankruptcy Law and in the Debtor and CreditorLaw of the State of New York), (B) left it with unreasonably small capital at the time this NoteGuarantee was entered into, or at the time the undersigned Guarantor Incurred liability hereunder,after giving effect to the Incurrence of existing Indebtedness immediately prior to such time or(C) left such Guarantor with debts beyond its ability to pay as such debts mature; *provided*that,it shall be a presumption in any lawsuit or other proceeding in which such Guarantor is a partythat the amount Guaranteed pursuant to its Note Guarantee is the amount set forth in subsection (a)above unless any creditor, or representative of creditors of such Guarantor, or debtor inpossession or trustee in bankruptcy of such Guarantor, otherwise proves in such a lawsuit or otherproceeding that the aggregate liability of such Guarantor is limited to the amount set forth insubsection (b). In making any determination as to the solvency or sufficiency of capital of theundersigned Guarantor in accordance with the previous sentence, the right of such Guarantor tocontribution from other Guarantors and any other rights such Guarantor may have, contractual orotherwise, shall be taken into account.     The undersigned Guarantor hereby certifies and warrants that all acts, conditions and thingsrequired to be done and performed and to have happened precedent to the creation and issuance ofthis Note Guarantee and to constitute the valid obligation of such Guarantor have been done andperformed and have happened in due compliance with all applicable laws.     The terms of this Guarantee shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws ofthe State of New York without regard to the conflict of laws principles thereof.     Capitalized terms used herein have the same meanings given in the Indenture, dated as ofDecember 23, 2009 (the “*Indenture*”), among National Money Mart Company (the “*Issuer*”), theGuarantors (as defined therein) and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, unless otherwiseindicated.
2

 
Dated: December 2, 2010      DFG ACQUISITION SERVICES, INC.
STATE of North Carolina v. Elton Ozell McLAUGHLIN.

No. 637A84-6.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 12, 2004.

J. Kirk Osborn, Chapel Hill, Jonathan E. Broun, Durham, for McLaughlin.

Valerie B. Spalding, Special Deputy Attorney General, Rex Gore, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 17th day of September 2003 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Bladen County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th day of August 2004."
**EXHIBIT31.2**

 

I, JeffreyKlausner, Chief Financial Officer of InfoSonics Corporation, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of InfoSonics Corporation.;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.     The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

 

5.     The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date: May 15,  2006 | /s/ Jeffrey  Klausner                 |   |
|---------------------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|                | Jeffrey Klausner,  Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER








In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007 (the “Periodic Report”), I, Morris Gelb, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Millennium Chemicals Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m or
      78o(d)); and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Millennium Chemicals Inc.











Date:  March
28,
2008                                                                                                      
   /s/
Morris Gelb


Morris
Gelb


President and Chief
Executive Officer











A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Millennium Chemicals Inc. and will be retained by Millennium Chemicals Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

PHARMACOPEIA DRUG DISCOVERY, INC.

 

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Pharmacopeia Drug Discovery, Inc.(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,Brian M. Posner, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer) of the Company,hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| By:    | /s/  Brian M. Posner                                        |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Brian  M. Posner                                            |
|   | Executive  Vice President,                                  |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer and Treasurer                      |
|   | (Principal  Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer) |

 

May12, 2006

 

1

----
STATE v. WILLIAMS.

No. COA03-536.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 6, 2004.

Certification Date July 26, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
# L_2016162EN.01002101.xml

| 21.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 162/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 162/21

---

COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2016/994

of 20 June 2016

repealing Common Position 2008/109/CFSP concerning restrictive measures imposed against Liberia

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 12 February 2008, the Council adopted Common Position 2008/109/CFSP (1) concerning restrictive measures against Liberia that provided for an arms embargo. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 12 February 2008, the Council adopted Common Position 2008/109/CFSP (1) concerning restrictive measures against Liberia that provided for an arms embargo.

| (2) | On 25 May 2016, the United Nations Security Council adopted UNSCR 2288 (2016) with regard to Liberia, terminating, with immediate effect, the measures on arms previously set out in paragraph 2 of UNSCR 1521 (2003) and modified by paragraphs 1 and 2 of UNSCR 1683 (2006), by paragraph 1(b) of UNSCR 1731 (2006), by paragraphs 3, 4, 5 and 6 of UNSCR 1903 (2009), by paragraph 3 of UNSCR 1961 (2010) and by paragraph 2(b) of UNSCR 2128 (2013). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 25 May 2016, the United Nations Security Council adopted UNSCR 2288 (2016) with regard to Liberia, terminating, with immediate effect, the measures on arms previously set out in paragraph 2 of UNSCR 1521 (2003) and modified by paragraphs 1 and 2 of UNSCR 1683 (2006), by paragraph 1(b) of UNSCR 1731 (2006), by paragraphs 3, 4, 5 and 6 of UNSCR 1903 (2009), by paragraph 3 of UNSCR 1961 (2010) and by paragraph 2(b) of UNSCR 2128 (2013).

| (3) | Common Position 2008/109/CFSP should therefore be repealed, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Common Position 2008/109/CFSP should therefore be repealed,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Common Position 2008/109/CFSP is repealed.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Luxembourg, 20 June 2016.

For the Council

The President

F. MOGHERINI

---

(1)  Council Common Position 2008/109/CFSP of 12 February 2008 concerning restrictive measures imposed against Liberia (OJ L 38, 13.2.2008, p. 26).

1

---
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. FARMERS’ ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, Inc., Respondent.

No. 14444.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

June 30, 1953.

Owsley Vose, Attorney, N.L.R.B., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D. C., George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, Fannie M. Boyls and Henry Rose, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

William A. Brown, Austin, Tex., Byron R. Tinsley, Greenville, Tex., Powell, Wirtz & Rauhut, Austin, Tex., for respondent Farmers’ Electric Cooperative, Inc.

Before HOLMES, BORAH, and RIVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The petition to enforce the order of the Board should be, and the same hereby, is granted.

Petition granted.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) 139

Science | Service | STEWARDSHIP PROTECT THE EARTH

A habitat is a place where an animal or plant lives and grows. How many 

habitats do you see in this picture? There are thousands! This is because 

the branched and wrinkled shape of the sponges and corals produce 

many diff erent spaces of many sizes that can provide shelter to other 

organisms. The variety of habitats found on coral reefs is one of the reasons that a square foot of coral reef supports more species than any other 

marine environment. 

Here’s a way to show how coral reefs create a wide variety of habitats by 

repeatedly dividing a space into smaller and smaller pieces.

What You Will Need:

❒ Colored pencils or fi ne-point markers

❒ Ruler

❒ Copy of “Triangle Graph Paper”

What You Will Do

Make a Sierpinski triangle that shows how 

repeatedly dividing a fixed space 

produces an infinite series of 

increasingly smaller spaces. Sponge, coral, and soft coral.

Courtesy Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary

Now THAT’s Complex!
noaa.gov

Discover Your World With NOAA

140

How to Do It:

1. Begin by drawing an equilateral triangle measuring 16 cm on each side. This triangle is 

drawn in red on the “Triangle Graph Paper.”

2. Find the midpoint of each side (8 cm), and 

join these midpoints as shown in Step 1. 

3. Shade the triangle in the middle as shown in 

Step 2. 

4. Find the midpoints of each side of the three 

outer triangles (4 cm), and join these as 

shown in Step 3. 

5. Shade each of the middle triangles as shown 

in Step 4. 

6. Continue this process three more times, until 

the midpoints measure 0.5 cm, shading 

the middle triangles each time, until the 

drawing appears similar to Step 5. You 

have made many different-size “habitats,” 

simply by dividing the space over and over 

again. Theoretically, you could continue 

this process indefinitely to make an infinite 

number of habitats!

Want to Do More?

The Sierpinski Triangle is an example of fractals, 

which are geometric figures that have special 

properties and are often found in nature. For 

more information about fractals, visit math.rice.

edu/~lanius/frac/.

This activity was adapted from “Architects of Seamount 

Ecosystems” by Mel Goodwin, PhD, Marine Biologist and 

Science Writer, Mt. Pleasant, SC.; from the Ocean Explorer 

2004 Gulf of Alaska Seamount Expedition oceanexplorer.

noaa.gov/explorations/04alaska/background/edu/media/

goa04_form.pdf

Step 1

Step 2

Step 3

Step 4

Step 5
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) 141

Science | Service | STEWARDSHIP Protect the Eart

Triangle Graph Paper
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant To18 U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant ToSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Hospira, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Thomas E. Werner, Senior Vice President,Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  THOMAS  E. WERNER    |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|
|                                |
| Thomas  E. Werner                   |
| Senior  Vice President, Finance and |
| Chief  Financial Officer            |
| November 5,  2008              |

 

1

----
Jimmy Columbus BELL v. Bonnie BOYETTE, Superintendent, and the State of North Carolina.

No. 644P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 3, 2005.

Jimmy Columbus Bell, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of NC.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 28th day of December 2004 in *230this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of February 2005."