alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**
I, Robert P. May, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CCOHoldings, LLC and CCO Holdings Capital Corp.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrants as of, and for,the periods presented in this report; 4.  The registrants’ other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrants and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrants,including their consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b)  [Reserved];  (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrants’ disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrants’ internal control over financialreporting that occurred during theregistrants’ most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrants’ fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrants’ internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrants’ other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrants’auditors and the audit committee of the registrants’ board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrants’ ability to record,process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrants’internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 11, 2005   /s/ Robert. P. May    Robert P. May  Interim President and Chief Executive Officer
- Home
- Facts
- Where is Point Nemo?

# **Where is Point Nemo?**

## Point Nemo is the location in the ocean that is **farthest from land**.

*You can't get farther away from land than 'Point Nemo.'*

Want to get away from it all? You can't do better than a point in the  Pacific Ocean popularly known as 'Point Nemo,' named after the famous submarine sailor from Jules Verne's *Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea*.

This remote oceanic location  is located at coordinates 48°52.6′S 123°23.6′W, about 2,688 kilometers from the nearest land—Ducie Island, part of the Pitcairn Islands, to the north; Motu Nui, one of the Easter Islands, to the northeast; and Maher Island, part of Antarctica, to the south. 

##### More **Information**

How much of the ocean have we explored?

 Why Explore? [NOAA's Ocean Explorer]

##### **Last updated:**

###### 						 1/04/21					

**Author:** NOAA

How to cite this article

Contact Us

##### 					Feedback

              -  Provide Feedback 
              -  Contact Us
              -  Report an error

##### 					Social

              - 
              - 
              - 
*Science. Service.Stewardship.*
							About NOS						- About Us
- NOS Program Offices
- Media Inquiries
- Website Acknowledgements
- Site Index
- Disclaimer
							More Resources						- Freedom of Information Act
- Accessibility
- Information Quality
- Privacy Policy
- NOS For Employees
- USA.gov
-  Department of Commerce
-  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
-  National Ocean Service
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of T Bancshares, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Patrick G. Adams, as
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Ken Bramlage, as Vice President and
Controller of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
of his knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




T
      BANCSHARES, INC.Date:
      August 14, 2009
                By:
                /s/
      Patrick G. AdamsPatrick
      G. Adams
                  Chief
      Executive Officer
                  Principal
      Executive Officer
                  Acting
      Co-Principal Financial OfficerDate:
      August 14, 2009
                By:
                /s/
      Ken BramlageKen
      Bramlage
                  Vice
      President and Controller
                  Acting
      Co-Principal Financial
Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Michel Mayer, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 (the Quarterly Report), which this statement accompanies fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) for the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certificate is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906.

Dated: July 21, 2006



/s/    MICHEL
MAYERMichel Mayer Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.




37
Exhibit 32


                                CERTIFICATION OF
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Brian Jaggard, Chief Financial Officer, President and Chief Executive Officer
of YZAPP INTERNATIONAL INC. (the "Company"), hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

      (i)  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for the fiscal
           quarter ended January 31, 2007, and to which this certification is
           attached as Exhibit 32 (the "Report") fully complies with the
           requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
           of 1934, as amended; and

      (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
           of the Company.

                                  By:             /s/ Brian Jaggard
                                                  ------------------------
                                  Name:           Brian Jaggard
                                  Title:          CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                                  PRESIDENT and
                                                  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                                  Date:           March 16, 2007


<PAGE>
SALOMON BROTHERS HIGH INCOME FUND II INC

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

August 8, 2002


1. Election of Directors
	Votes	 Votes
Name of Director	Votes For	Against		Withheld	Abstentions

	Class I
		Daniel P Cronin	65,997,976.507	1,125,956.390	--	--
		Jeswald W. Salacuse	65,926,776.507	1,197,156.390	--	--

	Class II
		Leslie H. Gelb	65,880,993.507	1,243,049.390	--	--

	Class III
		Carol L. Colman	65,941,798.507	1,182,134.390	--	--


At October 31, 2002, in addition to the above directors,
the other Directors of the Fund were as follows:

R. Jay Gerken
Dr. Riordan Roett
1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ProCentury Corporation (ProCentury);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of ProCentury as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    ProCenturys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for ProCentury and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to ProCentury,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of ProCenturys disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures as at the end of the period concerned by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in ProCenturys internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during ProCenturys most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, ProCenturys internal control over
financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    ProCenturys other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to ProCenturys auditors and the
audit committee of ProCenturys board of directors:
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
ProCenturys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in ProCenturys internal control over financial reporting.
 May 12, 2008Date/s/ Erin E. WestSignatureChief Financial Officer and TreasurerTitle
 42
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4805 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Chloro-6-Fluorobenzyl Chloride: 

Benzene, 2,4-dichloro-1,3-dinitro-5-(trifluoromethyl)-. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 18, 2007 

Mr. COBLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Chloro-6-Fluorobenzyl 

Chloride: Benzene, 2,4-dichloro-1,3-dinitro-5- 

(trifluoromethyl)-. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2-CHLORO-6-FLUOROBENZYL CHLORIDE: BEN4 ZENE, 2,4-DICHLORO-1,3-DINITRO-5- 

5 (TRIFLUOROMETHYL)-. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4805 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 2-Chloro-6-Fluorobenzyl 

Chloride: Benzene, 2,4- 

dichloro-1,3-dinitro-5- 

(trifluoromethyl)- (CAS No. 

55117–15–2) (provided for 

in subheading 2903.69.80) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2967

ROBERT JOSEPH AMMIRATI; ROSEANN MARIE AMMIRATI,

Plaintiffs - Appellees,

versus

NELLIE MAE INCORPORATED; THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCE INSTITUTE,

Defendants - Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District

Judge. (CA-95-337-4-22, BK-94-72609)

Submitted: April 9, 1996 Decided: May 10, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Robert Lester, THE LESTER LAW FIRM, Columbia, South Carolina,

for Appellants. Robert Joseph Ammirati, Roseann Marie Ammirati,

Appellees Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal from the district court's order affirming

the bankruptcy court's order that a portion of the education loans

owed by Robert Ammirati is dischargeable in bankruptcy. We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Ammirati v. Nellie Mae Inc., Nos. CA-95-337-4-22;

BK-94-72609 (D.S.C. Oct. 11, 1995). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Robert Lee THACKER v. STATE of North Carolina.

No. 351P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2004.

Robert Lee Thacker, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 30th day of June 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Guilford County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2004."
EXHIBIT 32.1


      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the Quarterly Report  of  UniPro  Financial
Services,  Inc.  (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB  for  the  period
ended  January 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),   I,   Harvey
Judkowitz,  Chief  Financial Officer  of  the  Company,  certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Section 1350, as  adopted  pursuant  to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements  of
Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  of  1934;
and

          (2)  The  information contained in  the  Report  fairly
presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and
result of operations of the Company.




Date: February 18, 2004
                                   /s/ Harvey Judkowitz
                                   ------------------------------
                                   Harvey Judkowitz
                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                   (Principal Financial Officer)
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, theundersigned Chief Financial Executive Officer and Controller of GrayMarkProductions, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that, to the best of myknowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the threemonths ended September 30, 2007 (the “Quarterly Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and that information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| Date: November 14, 2007 | /S/MARK  R. KIDD                          |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                    | Chief  Financial Officer

and  Controller |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000919557
<NAME> Salomon Brothers Global High Yield Portfolio
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER>008
   <NAME>Travelers Series Fund Inc.

<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  Oct-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                       Oct-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>               21,734,600
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>              20,468,035
<RECEIVABLES>                          394,183
<ASSETS-OTHER>                       1,386,435
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      22,248,653
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>             1,168,389
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                      0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>            1,576,683
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                  2,745,072
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                              0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>            22,664,653
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                1,972,050
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                2,279,254
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>            1,144,638
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                       0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>             (3,034,333)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                     0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>            (1,271,377)
<NET-ASSETS>                        19,503,581
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                       (4,206)
<INTEREST-INCOME>                    1,933,935
<OTHER-INCOME>                               0
<EXPENSES-NET>                         211,985
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>              1,717,744
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>            (1,505,807)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>              732,745
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                  944,682
<EQUALIZATION>                               0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>            1,545,128
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                     0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                        0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                 67,894
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>            532,283
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                    157,185
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>              (3,787,172)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>              1,545,396
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>           (2,101,900)
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                      0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                   0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                  174,410
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                        211,985
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                21,663,119
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                   10.220
<PER-SHARE-NII>                          0.810
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                 (0.370)
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                     0.770
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                0.000
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                     0.000
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                      9.890
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                           0.98



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4940 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4940

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on sets of steel tubing for 
                            bicycle frames.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 15, 2008

Mr. Blumenauer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on sets of steel tubing for 
                            bicycle frames.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SETS OF STEEL TUBING FOR BICYCLE ASSEMBLY.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.24.68 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to sets of steel tubing for the 
assembly of bicycles) is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
STATE v. Linwood Earl FORTE.

No. 20A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 21, 2004.

William N. Farrell, Senior Deputy Attorney General, C. Branson Vickory, III, District Attorney, for State.

*551The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th day of December 2004 by Defendant to Bypass the N.C. Court of Appeals in Indictment Nos. 01CRS4722-4730:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 21st day of December 2004."
STATE of North Carolina ex rel. Utilities Commission; and Duke Energy Corporation, Respondent v. CAROLINA UTILITY CUSTOMERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Petitioner.

No. 134P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 12, 2004.

James P. West, Raleigh, for Carolina Utility Customers Assoc.

Robert Kaylor, Raleigh, William Larry Porter, Charlotte, Kodwo Ghartey-Tagoe, for Duke Power Company.

Karen E. Long, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State ex rel. Utilities Comm.

Clarence W. Walker, Kiran H. Mehta, Charlotte, for Duke Energy Corporation.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 2nd day of April 2004 by Respondent (State of NC ex rel. Utilities Commission) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby *683certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th day of August 2004."