alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE of North Carolina v. Robert Thomas LITTLE.

No. 183A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 12, 2004.

Benjamin Dowling Sendor, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Robert Thomas Little.

Elizabeth Weese, Assistant Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Defendant on the 20th day of April 2004 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th day of August 2004."

Accordingly, only those issues which are the basis of the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals shall be presented to this Court in briefs. The Defendant's new brief so limited in scope shall be filed with this Court not more that 30 days from the date of certification of this order.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER 31, 1998 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF
DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS,
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             695
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,117
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,166
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,342
<PP&E>                                          18,759
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,898
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 100,035
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,997
<BONDS>                                         44,937
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,397
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   100,035
<SALES>                                         74,823
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                74,823
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,915
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (57)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,889
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,076
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,490
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,586
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,586
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.54)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.2.9




June 30, 2019 


CorEnergy Infrastructure Trust, Inc.
1100 Walnut Street, Suite 3350
Kansas City, Missouri  64106
Re:    Management Agreement for CorEnergy Infrastructure Trust, Inc.
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Reference is made to that certain Management Agreement, dated as of May 8, 2015 and effective as of May 1, 2015, by and between CorEnergy Infrastructure Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), and Corridor InfraTrust Management, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Manager”) (as such agreement has been, and may be further, amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Management Agreement”).  Capitalized terms used and not defined herein are used as defined in the Management Agreement.  The Company and the Manager have entered into this Letter Agreement to waive a portion of the Incentive Fee set forth in Section 8(b) of the Management Agreement applicable to the dividend paid during the calendar quarter ending June 30, 2019.  This letter in no way supersedes our May 9, 2016 letter agreement (effective March 31, 2016) concerning the Management Fee calculation.
This letter documents that the Manager has recommended, and the Company has agreed, that the Manager shall only be paid an Incentive Fee of $25,292 as a result of the dividend paid during the Company’s June 30, 2019 calendar quarter. This agreed upon incentive fee payment constitutes a waiver by the Manager of $134,813 of the Incentive Fee that would otherwise be due to the Manager from the Company.
The foregoing waiver shall not apply to any prior or future periods, although the Manager reserves the right to waive in the future any Incentive Fee payment to which it may be entitled for one or more future fiscal quarters of the Company.
The Company and the Manager mutually acknowledge and agree that this modification to the Incentive Fee payment right represents a discretionary action on the part of the Manager that is not required under the terms of the Management Agreement and that, except as specifically set forth herein, and as modified in our prior May 9, 2016 letter agreement concerning the Management Fee calculation, all provisions of the Management Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and shall not be affected by this letter.
	
				
	 
	 
	Very truly yours,

	 
	 
	CORRIDOR INFRATRUST MANAGEMENT, LLC

	 
	 
	By:  /s/ Richard C. Green, Jr.                                 

	 
	 
	Name:  Richard C. Green, Jr., Managing Director

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	Agreed and accepted:
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	CORENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE TRUST, INC.
	 

	By:  /s/ David J. Schulte                                          
	 
	 

	Name:  David J. Schulte, President
OLD REPUBLIC SUR. CO. v. RELIABLE HOUSING, INC.

No. COA03-1264.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 7, 2004.

Certification Date September 27, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed as modified.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The
undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Fieldstone Investment Corporation (the "Company"), each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the
date hereof:



May
16, 2005

| |  | /s/MICHAEL J. SONNENFELDMichael J. Sonnenfeld
Chief Executive Officer
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ROBERT G. PARTLOWRobert G. Partlow
Chief Financial Officer        

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I, Brian Jaggard, Chief Financial Officer, President and Chief Executive
Officer of YZAPP INTERNATIONAL INC. (the "Company"), hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (i)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for the fiscal
          quarter ended October 31, 2005, and to which this certification is
          attached as Exhibit 32 (the "Report") fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934, as amended; and

     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                 By:      /s/ Brian Jaggard
                                          ------------------------------------

                                 Name:    Brian Jaggard

                                 Title:   CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                          PRESIDENT and CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                                 Date:    December 15, 2005
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 09/09/14          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      425,310
COMMITMENTS
 144,728  171,978  105,194  151,578  114,250  401,500  391,422   23,810   33,888

CHANGES FROM 09/02/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     15,932)
  12,280   10,417      799    3,068    5,081   16,147   16,297     -215     -365

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    34.0     40.4     24.7     35.6     26.9     94.4     92.0      5.6      8.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      202)
      67       76       85       39       40      155      164
```

----

Updated September 12, 2014
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank

# AGENCY:

Export-Import Bank.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Charter of the Export-Import Bank of the United States, this notice is to inform the public that the Export-Import Bank of the United States has received an application for $39.8 million in medium-term insurance to support the export of approximately $45.7 million worth of U.S. aluminum beverage cans and ends manufacturing equipment to Brazil. The U.S. exports will enable the Brazilian company to expand its existing production by 3 billion aluminum cans per year and 2.8 billion aluminum can ends per year. New production will be sold in Brazil.

# DATES:

                        Comments are due 14 days from publication in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# ADDRESSES:

                        Interested parties may submit comments on this transaction electronically on                         *www.regulations.gov,*                         or by email to                         *economic.impact@exim.gov.*

Eric Larger,

Office of Policy Analysis and International Relations.

[FR Doc. 2022-13826 Filed 6-28-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000919557
<NAME> Alliance Growth Portfolio
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER>002
   <NAME>Travelers Series Fund Inc.

<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  Oct-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                       Oct-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>            1,140,234,556
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>           1,378,368,521
<RECEIVABLES>                        3,412,015
<ASSETS-OTHER>                          38,596
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   1,381,819,132
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>            10,896,100
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                      0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>              971,163
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                 11,867,263
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                              0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>           961,275,093
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>               47,851,851
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>               41,126,607
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>            2,621,459
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                       0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>            167,921,352
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                     0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>           238,133,965
<NET-ASSETS>                     1,369,951,869
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                    9,456,168
<INTEREST-INCOME>                    4,165,084
<OTHER-INCOME>                               0
<EXPENSES-NET>                      11,227,216
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>              2,394,036
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>           167,878,452
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>          (65,855,300)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>              104,417,188
<EQUALIZATION>                               0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>            1,188,087
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>           104,363,232
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                        0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>              5,326,836
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>          2,172,340
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                  3,570,748
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>             204,037,930
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>              1,549,118
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>          104,272,524
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                      0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                   0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>               11,011,245
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                     11,227,216
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>             1,370,579,353
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                   28.350
<PER-SHARE-NII>                          0.050
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                  2.660
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                     0.030
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                2.400
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                     0.000
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                     28.630
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                           0.81



</TABLE>
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DEVON LYNN GULLEY, Defendant.

No. COA03-1540

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed July 20, 2004.

This case not for publication

Wake County Nos. 00 CRS 101694-95, 00 CRS 101700, 00 CRS 101714-16, 03 CRS 14076-79.

*Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General Joseph Finarelli, for the State.*

*Moshera H. Mohamed, for defendant-appellant.*

HUDSON, Judge.

Defendant pled guilty to 31 counts of robbery with a dangerous weapon and 14 counts of second degree kidnapping. The plea agreement provided that the cases be consolidated so that defendant would receive five "class D, Level III judgments, the length & number of sentences . . . in the discretion of the court." The court imposed five separate sentences of 90 to 117 months, all sentences to run consecutively. We dismiss the appeal.

Defendant contends as his sole assignment of error that the court "abused its discretion when it placed the Defendant at a level 3 for sentencing and sentenced him to a minimum of 90 months and a maximum of 117 months." He argues in his brief that thecourt erred by failing to find factors in mitigation.

When a defendant pleads guilty or no contest, he has a appeal of right only on the following issues:

> (1) whether the sentence is supported by the evidence but only if the minimum term of imprisonment does not fall within the presumptive range; (2) whether the sentence results from an incorrect finding of the defendant's prior record level or the defendant's prior conviction level; (3) whether the sentence contains a type of sentence that is not authorized for the defendant's class of offense and prior record or conviction level; (4) whether the sentence contains a term of imprisonment that is for a duration not authorized for the defendant's class of offense and prior record or conviction level; (5) whether the trial court improperly denied defendant's motion to suppress; and (6) whether the trial court improperly denied defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea.

*State v. Jamerson,* N.C. App. , 588 S.E.2d 545, 546-47 (2003) (internal statutory citations omitted). None of the foregoing issues are presented by defendant's assignment of error. Defendant's minimum sentence of 90 months is within the presumptive range for a Class D, Level III offense. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1340.17(c) (2003). Thus he has no right to appeal the issue of whether the sentence is supported by the evidence. Because defendant has presented no other appealable issue for our consideration, we dismiss this appeal. *Jamerson,* N.C. App. at , 588 S.E.2d at 547.

Dismissed.

Judges STEELMAN and THORNBURG concur.

Report per Rule 30(e).
Exhibit
32.1
  **SECTION
906 CERTIFICATION**
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of First Metroplex Capital,
Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
  (1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and
  (2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
  FIRST METROPLEX CAPITAL,
      INC.Dated: May 16, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Patrick G.
  AdamsPatrick G. Adams
      Chief
      Executive Officer
 **COMPANY NAME
      CORPORATION**Dated: May 16, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Sue HiggsSue
      Higgs
      Chief
      Financial Officer
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to First Metroplex Capital, Inc. and will be retained by First
Metroplex Capital, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
Samir BENAMOR, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6902

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.3**

 

PHARMACOPEIA DRUG DISCOVERY, INC.

 

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Pharmacopeia Drug Discovery, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Brian M. Posner, Vice President, Finance (Chief Accounting Officer) of theCompany, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Brian  M. Posner   |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|
| Brian  M. Posner            |
| Vice  President, Finance    |
| (Chief  Accounting Officer) |
|                        |
| August 5,  2005        |

 

----
U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
				Here's how you know we're official. **Official websites use .gov** A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure websites use HTTPS** A small lock or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to a .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Toggle navigation Toggle search National Ocean Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
 Search
					Search National Ocean Service


Home
				Ocean Facts

				Topics
					Explore All Topics 
                        Arctic 
                        Careers 
                        Economy 
                        Ecosystems 
                        Geodesy 
                        Hazards 
                        Navigation 
                        Observations 
                        Ocean 
                        Recreation 
                         Sea Level Rise 
                        Story Maps 
                        Tools
                
                			Education

				
				News
				Podcasts
				Video
				Images
				About Us


1. Home
2. Education
3. For Students

For Students Dive in to our tutorials on subjects ranging from corals to tides to geodesy. For Educators | For Kids


All About Corals
 All About Estuaries
  All About Global Positioning
  All About Non-point Source Pollution
  All About Ocean Currents
 All About Tides


Feedback Provide Feedback
							Contact Us
							Report an error
 Social Instagram Logo/a>


*Science. Service.Stewardship.*
 About NOS About Us
							NOS Program Offices
							Media Inquiries
							Website Acknowledgements
                            Site Index
							Disclaimer
 More Resources Freedom of Information Act
							Accessibility
							Information Quality
							Privacy Policy
							NOS For Employees
							USA.gov
 Department of Commerce
									National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
									National Ocean Service
STATE v. Tony Robert JONES.

No. 669P03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2004.

Anne M. Middleton, Assistant Attorney General, Tom Horner, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 29th day of December 2003 by Defendant for a New Sentencing Hearing:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 5th day of February 2004."