alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATIONSI, Erin E. West, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ProCentury Corporation (“ProCentury”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of ProCentury as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. ProCentury’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for ProCentury and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to ProCentury,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonableassurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accountingprinciples;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of ProCentury’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures as at the end of the period concerned by this report based on suchevaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in ProCentury’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during ProCentury’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, ProCentury’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. ProCentury’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to ProCentury’s auditors and theaudit committee of ProCentury’s board of directors: a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectProCentury’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in ProCentury’s internal control over financial reporting.August 7, 2006
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE, Petitioner v. Micheal BACA, et al.

No. 19-518

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petitioner in No. 19-465 and respondent in No. 19-518 shall file opening and reply briefs on the merits under the schedule set forth in Rules 25.1 and 25.3. Respondent in No. 19-465 and petitioner in No. 19-518 shall file response briefs on the merits under the schedule set forth in Rule 25.2.
Independent Auditors' Report


To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Smith Barney World Funds, Inc.:

In planning and performing our audits of the financial statements
of the Smith Barney World Funds, Inc. (the Funds) consisting of
Global Government Portfolio, European Portfolio, and
International All Cap Growth Portfolio for the year ended October
31, 2001, we considered its internal control, including control
activities for safeguarding securities, in order to determine our
auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on
the financial statements and to comply with the requirements of
Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on the internal control.

The management of the Funds is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles. Those controls include the safeguarding of
assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, error or
fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any
evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to
the risk that it may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in the internal control that might be
material weaknesses under standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness
is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of
the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively
low level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in
amounts that would be material in relation to the financial
statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a
timely period by employees in the normal course of performing
their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters involving
the internal control and its operation, including controls for
safeguarding securities that we consider to be material
weaknesses as defined above.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management, the Board of Directors of the Funds, and the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not intended to be and
should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.



New York, New York
December 12, 2001
U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
				Here's how you know we're official. **Official websites use .gov** A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure websites use HTTPS** A small lock or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to a .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Toggle navigation Toggle search National Ocean Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
 Search
					Search National Ocean Service


Home
				Ocean Facts

				Topics
					Explore All Topics 
                        Arctic 
                        Careers 
                        Economy 
                        Ecosystems 
                        Geodesy 
                        Hazards 
                        International
                        Navigation 
                        Observations 
                        Ocean 
                        Recreation 
                         Sea Level Rise 
                        Story Maps 
                        Tools
                
                			Education

				
				News
				Podcasts
				Video
				Images
				About Us


1. Home
2. Topics
3. Arctic: Ocean & Coasts

The Arctic: Ocean & Coasts Explore our curated list of topics to better understand how National Ocean Service programs and activities support the environment, our blue economy, human health, and coastal communities.


Accurate Positioning Data for Alaska and the Arctic
 Arctic Disaster Prep and Response
  Marine Debris in Alaska
  Revolutionary Land Cover Data for Alaska
 Alaska Tides and Currents
  Kasitsna Bay Laboratory
  SeaScape Alaska
 Kachemak National Estuarine Research Reserve
 Alaska Nautical Charts


Visit NOAA's Arctic Program website to learn more about our mission, vission, and current projects.
    NOAA Arctic Program


Feedback Provide Feedback
							Contact Us
							Report an error
 Social Instagram Logo/a>


*Science. Service.Stewardship.*
 About NOS About Us
							NOS Program Offices
							Media Inquiries
							Website Acknowledgements
                            Site Index
							Disclaimer
 More Resources Freedom of Information Act
							Accessibility
							Information Quality
							Privacy Policy
							NOS For Employees
							USA.gov
 Department of Commerce
									National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
									National Ocean Service
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



I, Raymond Z. Wang, certify that:



1.    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Greenland Technologies Holding Corporation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019; and



2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|Date: | May 8, 2020 | By: | /s/ Raymond Z. Wang                                                
|----- | ----------- | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|      |             |     | Raymond Z. Wang                                                    
|      |             |     | Chief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer)
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

A.L., a Child,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-1959

[March 17, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Gregory M. Keyser, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2017-CJ000225-XXXX-MB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Virginia Murphy, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L. 

Melear, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, CIKLIN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4766 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4766

     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on electric juice 
                              extractors.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 17, 2007

Mr. Scott of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on electric juice 
                              extractors.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELECTRIC JUICE EXTRACTORS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.44 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# Wniteb**~tates** 

# (!Court of§ppeaIs for t1JejfeberaI (!Cirroit

UNITED STATES,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

### v. CANEX INTERNATIONAL LUMBER SALES, LTD., Defendant-Appellant, 

### v. XL SPECIALITYINSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. 2012-1027 Appeal from the United States Court of International Trade in case no. OB-CV-0141, Judge Jane 

### A. Restani. 

### ONMOTION

ORDER Canex International Lumber Sales, Ltd. moves for a 30-day extension of time, until January 18, 2012, to file its initialbrief.USv.CANEXINTLLUMBERSALES Upon consideration thereof, 

### IT 

### Is ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. 

## DEC 21 2011 Date

cc: Aimee Lee, Esq Joel R. Junker, Esq. T. Randolph Ferguson, Esq. s21 FOR THE COURT /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk 2

II.!.

## Jo~t~EALS

# FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

## DEC 212011

JAN HORBALY 

### ClERK
Dismiss and Opinion Filed December 18, 2015 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01077-CV 

RONE ENGINEERING SERVICES, LTD., Appellant 

V. 

DELTEK, INC., Appellee 

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-01839 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Francis, Evans, and Stoddart 

Opinion by Justice Francis 

 Under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1, appellant has filed a motion requesting 

the Court dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). We grant the motion and dismiss 

the appeal. See id. 

151077F.P05 

 /Molly Francis/ 

MOLLY FRANCIS 

JUSTICE 
 –2– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

RONE ENGINEERING SERVICES, LTD., 

Appellant 

No. 05-15-01077-CV V. 

DELTEK, INC., Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-01839. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Francis. 

Justices Evans and Stoddart participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. 

 We ORDER appellee Deltek, Inc. recover its costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant 

Rone Engineering Services, Ltd. 

Judgment entered December 18, 2015.
Independent Auditors' Consent



To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Managed Municipals Fund Inc.:

We consent to the use of our report dated April 12,
1999, with respect to the Managed Municipals Fund
Inc., incorporated herein by reference and to the
references to our Firm under the headings
"Financial Highlights" in the Prospectus and
"Auditors" in the Statement of Additional
Information.



	KPMG
LLP


New York, New York
June 21, 1999
Modeling Marine Ecosystems With Virtual Reality:

Predators and Prey Module Worksheet #1

Lynx and Hare Populations Vary Together

Complete each of the following statements based on your observations of lynx and 

hare populations in a predator-prey model. Fill in each blank with “increases”, “stays 

the same” or “decreases”. 

When the hare population is large, the lynx population ______________ 

(increases, stays the same, decreases). 

When the hare population is small, the lynx population ______________ 

(increases, stays the same, decreases). 

When the lynx population is large, the hare population ______________ 

(increases, stays the same, decreases). 

When the lynx population is small, the hare population ______________ 

(increases, stays the same, decreases). 

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Modeling Marine Ecosystems With Virtual Reality:

Predators and Prey Module Worksheet #2

Cod and Mackerel Biomass Trends

Fill in the blank cells in the “Biomass Trend” column of each of the two tables below. 

Describe the trend over time as “increasing”, “decreasing” or “staying the same”. The 

first table is for the model-based scenario called NEFSCassessment. The second table is 

for the observational data scenario called NEFSCsurveytrawlandMammalBird. 

For each table, first fill in the trend for cod. Next, add your prediction for mackerel. 

Finally, look at the mackerel graph and add the actual trend for mackerel.

Data from Model: NEFSCassessment

Species Biomass Trend

Atlantic Cod

Atlantic Mackerel (hypothesis)

Atlantic Mackerel (observed)

Data from Observations: NEFSCsurveytrawlandMammalBird

Species Biomass Trend

Atlantic Cod

Atlantic Mackerel (hypothesis)

Atlantic Mackerel (observed)

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Virtual “Dive” Location: These scenarios use different datasets, but both are in the 

Northeast region, in the sand flats habitat in the Gulf of Maine. 

To switch to the NEFSCassessment or NEFSCsurveytrawlandMammalBird scenario

from the Baseline senario (which loads by default), click the green SCN” (scenario) 

folder icon in the upper left in VES-V.
STATE v. Scott David ALLEN.

No. 115A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 25, 2004.

William N. Farrell, Special Deputy Attorney General, Garland N. Yates, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th day of May 2004 by Defendant:

> "Motion Allowed. Court reporter shall have up to and including the 21st day of June 2004 to prepare and deliver transcript to counsel. By order of the Court in conference this the 25th day of May 2004."
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 4 A2 26 4 . MAJ OR FORTSON v . RENDER C. FREEMAN et a l

.

On Ap ri l 2 5

, 20 14

, t h e t ri al co u rt en t ered an o rd er d en y i n g M ajo r Fo rt s o n ’ s

p et i t i o n t o rem o v e an at to rn ey ’ s fees l i en fro m hi s p ro p ert y. F o r t s o n f i l ed a m o t i o n

fo r reco ns i d erat io n , wh i ch t h e t ri al co u rt d en i ed

. On J u n e 3

, 2 0 1 4

, Fo rt s on fi l ed t h i s

d i rect ap p eal . W e l ack ju ri sd i ct i o n

. A n o t i ce o f ap p eal m

u s t be fi l ed wi t h i n 3 0 d ay s o f t h e en t ry o f t h e ord er s o u g ht

t o b e ap p eal ed

. OCGA § 5 -6 -3 8 (a). “ Th e p ro p er an d t i m el y fi l i n g o f a n o t i c e o f

ap p eal is an ab s o l u t e req u i rem en t t o co n fer j u ri sd i ct i o n u p o n an ap p el l at e co u rt .”
(Ci t at i o n an d p u n ct u at i o n o m i t t ed .) Per l ma n v. Per l ma n , 3 18 Ga. Ap p

. 7 31

, 7 3 9 (4 )
(7 3 4 SE2 d 5 6 0 ) (2 0 1 2 ). Th e fi l i n g o f a m o ti o n fo r reco n s i d erat i o n d o es n o t ex t en d

t h e t i m e fo r fi l i n g a n o t i ce o f ap p eal , an d t h e d en i al o f a m o t io n fo r reco n s i d erat i o n

i s n o t i t s el f a d i rect l y

ap p eal ab l e o rd er. See Bel l v. Co h r an , 2 4 4 Ga. Ap p . 5 1 0 , 5 1 1
(5 3 6 SE2 d 1 8 7 ) (2 0 0 0 ); Sa va g e v. News ome , 1 7 3 Ga. Ap p

. 2 7 1 (3 2 6 SE2 d 5 ) (1 9 8 5 ).

Here, Fo rt s o n fi l ed h i s no ti c e o f ap p eal 3 9 d ay s aft er en t ry o f t h e u n d erl y in g o rd er.

Th e u nt i m el y

ap p eal i s h ereb y

DISM ISSED fo r l ack o f ju ri s di ct i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t if y t h a t th e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 10/10/2014 October 10, 2014
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1248 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1248

   To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to repeal 
              certain limitations on health care benefits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 19, 2013

  Mr. Paulsen (for himself, Mr. Tiberi, Mr. Boustany, Mr. Pitts, Mr. 
 Chabot, Mr. Duncan of Tennessee, Mr. Roe of Tennessee, Mr. Alexander, 
Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Harper, Mr. Westmoreland, Mr. Ross, Mr. Latham, Mr. 
McKinley, Mr. Conaway, Mr. Jones, Mr. Gibbs, Mr. Nunnelee, Mr. Womack, 
 Mr. Schock, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Broun of Georgia, Mr. Latta, Mr. Yoder, 
   Mr. Barr, Mr. Collins of New York, Mr. Burgess, Mr. Gerlach, Mr. 
 Griffith of Virginia, Mr. Johnson of Ohio, Mr. Long, Mr. McCaul, Mr. 
  Stutzman, Mr. Lamborn, Mr. Bucshon, and Mr. Harris) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to repeal 
              certain limitations on health care benefits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Family Health Care Flexibility 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF DISTRIBUTIONS FOR MEDICINE QUALIFIED ONLY IF FOR 
              PRESCRIBED DRUG OR INSULIN.

    Section 9003 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 
(Public Law 111-148) and the amendments made by such section are 
repealed; and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be applied as if 
such section, and amendments, had never been enacted.

SEC. 3. REPEAL OF LIMITATION ON HEALTH FLEXIBLE SPENDING ARRANGEMENTS 
              UNDER CAFETERIA PLANS.

    Sections 9005 and 10902 of the Patient Protection and Affordable 
Care Act (Public Law 111-148) and section 1403 of the Health Care and 
Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-152) and the 
amendments made by such sections are repealed.
                                 <all>
```
DENIED and Opinion Filed June 28, 2024 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-24-00662-CV 

IN RE JOHN DARJEAN, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 160th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-07371 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Reichek, Goldstein, and Kennedy 

Opinion by Justice Reichek 

Before the Court is relator’s May 31, 2024 petition for writ of mandamus. 

Relator asks this Court to compel the trial court to vacate its May 15, 2024 Order 

Granting Defendant Shilo Sanders’ Amended Motion for Contempt and/or Other 

Appropriate Relief for Protective Order Violations. 

Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court 

clearly abused its discretion and that relator lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In 

re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. 

proceeding). If an order is void, however, a relator need not show it lacks an adequate 

appellate remedy. In re Saving Grace #2, LLC, No. 05-23-00745-CV, 2023 WL 
 –2– 

6783511, at *3 (Tex. App.—Dallas Oct. 13, 2023, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). 

After reviewing relator’s petition and the record before us, we conclude that relator 

has failed to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief. 

Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. TEX. R. APP.

P. 52.8(a). 

240662F.P05 

/Amanda L. Reichek/

AMANDA L. REICHEK 

JUSTICE