Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 121 / Friday, June 24, 2022 / Notices 37847 

1 16 U.S.C. 824o(d)(1). 

2 Id. 824o(e). 

3Rules Concerning Certification of the Elec. 

Reliability Org.; & Procedures for the Establishment, 

Approval, & Enforcement of Elec. Reliability 

Standards, Order No. 672, 114 FERC ¶ 61,104, order 

on reh’g, Order No. 672–A, 71 FR 19814 (April 18, 

2006),114 FERC ¶ 61,328 (2006). 

4N. Am. Elec. Reliability Corp., 116 FERC 

¶ 61,062, order on reh’g and compliance, 117 FERC 

¶ 61,126 (2006), aff’d sub nom. Alcoa, Inc. v. FERC, 

564 F.3d 1342 (D.C. Cir. 2009). 

5NERC Reliability Standard CIP–014–2 (Physical 

Security), Purpose. 

6NERC Petition at 1. Section C.1.1.4., Additional 

Compliance Information states: 

Confidentiality: To protect the confidentiality and 

sensitive nature of the evidence for demonstrating 

compliance with this standard, all evidence will be 

retained at the Transmission Owner’s and 

Transmission Operator’s facilities. 

7NERC Petition at 1. 

8 Id. at 5–6. 

9 Id. 

10 Id. at 6. 

35.13(a)(2)(iii): AEP submits one 

Facilities Agreement re: ILDSA, SA No. 

1336 to be effective 8/16/2022. 

Filed Date: 6/16/22. 

Accession Number: 20220616–5115. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 7/7/22. 

The filings are accessible in the 

Commission’s eLibrary system (https://

elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/ 

fercgensearch.asp) by querying the 

docket number. Any person desiring to 

intervene or protest in any of the above 

proceedings must file in accordance 

with Rules 211 and 214 of the 

Commission’s Regulations (18 CFR 

385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 

p.m. Eastern time on the specified 

comment date. Protests may be 

considered, but intervention is 

necessary to become a party to the 

proceeding. eFiling is encouraged. More 

detailed information relating to filing 

requirements, interventions, protests, 

service, and qualifying facilities filings 

can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/ 

docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For 

other information, call (866) 208–3676 

(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659. 

Dated: June 16, 2022. 

Debbie-Anne A. Reese, 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2022–13468 Filed 6–23–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Docket No. RD22–3–000] 

Before Commissioners: Richard Glick, 

Chairman; James P. Danly, Allison 

Clements, Mark C. Christie, and Willie 

L. Phillips; North American Electric 

Reliability Corporation; Order 

Approving Modifications to the 

Compliance Section of Reliability 

Standard CIP–014 

1. On February 16, 2022, the North 

American Electric Reliability 

Corporation (NERC), the Commissioncertified Electric Reliability 

Organization (ERO), submitted a 

petition seeking approval of Reliability 

Standard CIP–014–3, which would 

modify the compliance section of 

Reliability Standard CIP–014–2 

(Physical Security). The proposed 

modification would eliminate a 

provision requiring that all evidence 

demonstrating compliance with this 

Reliability Standard should be retained 

at the transmission owner’s or 

transmission operator’s facility. As 

discussed in this order, we approve 

NERC’s petition. 

I. Background 

A. Section 215 and Mandatory 

Reliability Standards 

2. Section 215 of the Federal Power 

Act (FPA) requires a Commissioncertified ERO to develop mandatory and 

enforceable Reliability Standards, 

subject to Commission review and 

approval. The ERO is obligated to file 

each Reliability Standard or 

modification to a Reliability Standard 

that it proposes to be made effective 

with the Commission.1 Reliability 

Standards may be enforced by the ERO, 

subject to Commission oversight, or by 

the Commission independently.2

Pursuant to section 215 of the FPA, the 

Commission established a process to 

select and certify an ERO,3 and 

subsequently certified NERC.4

B. Currently Effective Reliability 

Standard CIP–014–2 

3. Reliability Standard CIP–014–2, 

which applies to transmission owners 

and transmission operators, is designed 

to ‘‘identify and protect Transmission 

stations and Transmission substations, 

and their associated primary control 

centers, that if rendered inoperable or 

damaged as a result of a physical attack 

could result in widespread instability, 

uncontrolled separation, or Cascading 

within an Interconnection.’’ 5 Pursuant 

to the Reliability Standard, transmission 

owners must perform an initial and 

subsequent risk assessments to identify 

the transmission stations and 

substations that, if rendered inoperable 

or damaged could result in instability, 

uncontrolled separation, or cascading 

within an Interconnection, and is 

subject to a third party verification. 

Transmission owners that control 

identified facilities must conduct an 

evaluation of the potential threats and 

vulnerabilities of a physical attack to 

transmission stations and substation, as 

well as primary control centers, develop 

and implement a documented physical 

security plan and have a third-party 

review of the evaluation. 

C. NERC Petition for Modifications to 

the Compliance Section of Reliability 

Standard CIP–014 

4. NERC proposes to remove section 

C.1.1.4., Additional Compliance 

Information, from the compliance 

section of the currently effective 

Reliability Standard CIP–014–2 

(Physical Security) that requires all 

evidence demonstrating compliance 

with this Reliability Standard to be 

retained at the transmission owner’s or 

transmission operator’s facility in order 

to protect the entity’s confidential 

information.6 NERC states that the 

proposed change applies only to the 

compliance section of Reliability 

Standard CIP–014–2, and proposes no 

changes in the mandatory and 

enforceable Requirements of Reliability 

Standard CIP–014–2. According to 

NERC, the provision presents challenges 

to effective and efficient compliance 

monitoring and is not necessary to 

protect the confidentiality of Reliability 

Standard CIP–014–2 compliance 

evidence.7

5. NERC states that the ‘‘Additional 

Compliance Information’’ provision in 

the compliance section of CIP–014 was 

added to address heightened concerns 

regarding the protection of CIP–014 

evidence. However, NERC has 

determined that it should no longer treat 

CIP–014 evidence any differently than 

other sensitive evidence it collects 

during its Compliance Monitoring and 

Enforcement Program (CMEP) 

activities.8 With the advent of the ERO 

Secure Evidence Locker (SEL), NERC 

asserts that it has a secure means of 

collecting and analyzing CIP–014 

evidence in the same manner as any 

other sensitive evidence collected as 

part of CMEP activities.14

6. NERC explains that if the change is 

approved, it will no longer treat 

Reliability Standard CIP–014 evidence 

any differently than other sensitive 

evidence it collects during its 

compliance activities.9 NERC plans to 

use its SEL to support data and 

information handling, and it explains 

that it has developed the SEL for 

temporary storage of all registered entity 

compliance evidence.10 According to 

NERC, the SEL enables a registered 

entity to securely submit evidence 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
37848 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 121 / Friday, June 24, 2022 / Notices 

11EEI Comments at 1. 

12 Id. at 5. 

13 Id. 

14NERC Answer at 1. 

15 Id. at 2–3. 

16 Id. at 3–4. 

17 Id. at 4. 

18EEI Answer at 2. 

19 Id. 

20 Id. at 2–3. 21NERC Petition at 7; NERC Answer at 3. 

through an encrypted session; the 

evidence is encrypted immediately 

upon submission, securely isolated per 

registered entity, never extracted, never 

backed up, and subject to proactive and 

disciplined destruction policies. NERC 

submits that the SEL provides security 

advantages to ensure proper protection 

and chain-of-custody management of 

the submitted evidence for CIP–014 

compliance. 

7. NERC requests that the 

modification to the Reliability Standard 

become effective on the date of 

Commission approval. 

II. Notice of Filing and Responsive 

Pleadings 

8. Notice of NERC’s February 16, 2022 

Petition was published in the Federal 

Register, 87 FR 11061 (Feb. 28, 2022), 

with interventions and protests due on 

or before March 15, 2022. The Edison 

Electric Institute (EEI) filed a timely 

motion to intervene and comments. On 

March 21, 2022, NERC submitted a 

request to submit reply comments and 

reply comments (NERC Answer). On 

March 30, 2022, EEI filed a motion for 

leave to answer and answer (EEI 

Answer). 

9. EEI opposes NERC’s petition and 

maintains that Reliability Standard CIP– 

014 requires data collection for 

industry’s most sensitive assets and, 

therefore, the compliance provision 

should be retained so that NERC 

continues to review compliance 

evidence for this Reliability Standard 

only on-site at the registered entities for 

the most sensitive data.11 EEI explains 

that the information retained under this 

compliance requirement is of a critical 

and highly sensitive nature, and some 

information provided for Reliability 

Standard CIP–014 compliance is only 

available to a small set of personnel on 

a need-to-know basis within EEI 

member companies.12 According to EEI, 

its members go to great lengths to 

protect the identity of the assets and 

other sensitive information by using 

alternative anonymous names both in 

internal and external discussions. 

Further, EEI expresses security concerns 

related to the use of SEL, arguing that 

the SEL increases the risk of aggregated 

industry information falling into the 

hands of a nation state or bad actor.13

EEI argues that ease of access cannot 

take precedence over the safety, 

security, and reliability of the electric 

grid. 

10. NERC asserts in its answer that the 

proposed modification would not 

decrease the protection of any highly 

sensitive compliance evidence, but it is 

needed to ensure compliance 

monitoring with Reliability Standard 

CIP–014.14 Among other arguments, 

NERC explains that there will be limited 

CIP–014 evidence aggregated in the SEL 

at any given time.15 Further, NERC 

elaborates that a registered entity may 

choose to develop its own SEL rather 

than use NERC’s SEL, or use NERC’s 

exceptions process, which allows 

registered entities to collaborate with 

the compliance authority on alternative 

submittal methods. 

11. Finally, NERC states that over the 

last two years, due to pandemic 

restrictions, in some instances registered 

entities refused on-site access for 

compliance monitoring.16 In addition, 

certain entities also refused to allow a 

review of evidence using a secure 

videoconferencing platform. NERC 

believes that ‘‘[t]he end result was 

increased risk, in certain instances, 

because [NERC and the Regional 

Entities] had no mechanism with which 

to monitor compliance with CIP–014 

until the entity, at its own discretion, 

lifted its pandemic-related 

restriction.’’ 17

12. In its answer, EEI argues that more 

flexibility should be given to registered 

entities to select the most secure 

methods for providing CIP–014 

compliance data. In particular, EEI 

states that, if agreed to by a registered 

entity’s Compliance Enforcement 

Authority, ‘‘secure videoconferencing is 

an attractive and equally effective and 

efficient alternative to using the ERO 

SEL and one that EEI members would 

welcome.’’ 18 EEI notes, however, that 

certain entities may prefer to use their 

own videoconferencing tools, as 

opposed to an ERO-based tool, ‘‘because 

in doing so they have an understanding 

of, and confidence in, the security 

measures that have been 

implemented.’’ 19 Further, because 

many registered entities’ corporate 

security access management programs 

require training, background checks, 

and monitoring of third-party access, 

EEI believes that some registered 

entities may be unable to use their own 

SEL to submit compliance information 

if NERC or Regional Entity compliance 

personnel are unable or unwilling to 

meet their SEL security access 

requirements.20 EEI also expresses 

concern with the length of time NERC 

will keep compliance information in the 

SEL, as entities have no way of verifying 

whether it has been deleted. 

III. Determination 

A. Procedural Matters 

13. Pursuant to Rule 214 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 18 CFR 385.214 (2021), EEI’s 

timely, unopposed motion to intervene 

serve to make it a party to this 

proceeding. 

14. Rule 213(a)(2) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 18 CFR 385.213(a)(2) (2021), 

prohibits an answer to a protest or 

answer unless otherwise ordered by the 

decisional authority. We accept NERC’s 

and EEI’s answers because they have 

provided information that assisted us in 

our decision-making process. 

B. Substantive Matters 

15. As discussed below, we find that 

the proposed removal of the evidence 

retention provision in section C.1.1.4 of 

the compliance section of Reliability 

Standard CIP–014–2 is just, reasonable, 

not unduly discriminatory or 

preferential, and in the public interest. 

The modification will allow NERC to 

monitor compliance more effectively 

without compromising the 

confidentiality of sensitive information. 

Accordingly, we approve NERC’s 

petition. 

16. Reliability Standard CIP–014–2, 

compliance section C.1.1.4., Additional 

Compliance Information, currently 

requires compliance personnel and 

auditors (and enforcement staff if a 

potential noncompliance is identified) 

to be physically present at an entity’s 

facility to review evidence of 

compliance. As NERC’s petition 

explains, this requirement presented 

challenges during the pandemic, when 

auditors could not access certain 

entities’ facilities in person and in some 

instances were prevented from 

reviewing the evidence remotely.21

17. We recognize that Reliability 

Standard CIP–014–2 requires data 

collection for industry’s sensitive assets 

and that therefore the data should be 

handled in a secure manner. However, 

while section C.1.1.4 may have 

provided necessary protection in the 

past, we are persuaded by NERC’s 

explanation that its SEL now offers a 

secure and more flexible alternative for 

compliance evidence collection and 

review for Reliability Standard CIP– 

014–2. 

18. Moreover, we are not persuaded 

by EEI’s comments seeking to retain the 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 121 / Friday, June 24, 2022 / Notices 37849 

22NERC, Request of the North American Electric 

Reliability Corporation to expend funds to develop 

the ERO Enterprise Secure Evidence Locker, Docket 

No. RR19–8–001, at 4 (filed June 8, 2020) (NERC 

2020 Filing); N. Am. Elec. Reliability Corp., Docket 

No. RR19–8–001 (June 22, 2020) (delegated order). 

23NERC 2020 Filing at 5. 

24NERC Answer at 2. 

25 Id. at 2–3. 26 Id. 27 44 U.S.C. 3507(d). 28 5 CFR 1320 (2021). 29FERC staff estimates that industry costs for 

salary plus benefits are similar to Commission 

costs. The FERC 2021 average salary plus benefits 

for one FERC full-time equivalent (FTE) is 

$180,703/year (or $87.00/hour) posted by the 

Bureau of Labor Statistics for the Utilities sector 

(available at https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/ 

naics3_221000.htm). 

30The total number (344) of transmission owners 

(326) plus transmission operators (18) not also 

registered as owners, this represents the unique US 

entities (taken from data as of May 6, 2022). 

on-site viewing requirement. First, 

contrary to EEI’s suggestion in its 

comments, the use of the SEL is not 

novel and untested. In NERC’s petition 

requesting funding for the SEL, which 

was filed in June 2020, NERC explained 

that the use of an evidence locker was 

a practice already in place for at least 

two Regional Entities to collect evidence 

associated with Critical Infrastructure 

Protection (CIP) Reliability Standards.22

Before deciding to implement the SEL, 

NERC consulted with industry and 

discussed security concerns related to 

evidence collection.23 Also, NERC has 

been using the SEL to access 

compliance evidence for the other CIP 

Reliability Standards, which indicates 

that it is a well-established and secure 

method of evidence review. Restricting 

auditor review to on-site only when 

there is a secure alternative impairs the 

auditor’s ability to perform in-depth 

review of the evidence and could result 

in increased risk due to lack of adequate 

or timely compliance monitoring. 

19. Further, we are not persuaded by 

EEI’s argument that the SEL increases 

the risk of aggregated industry 

information falling into the hands of a 

nation-state or bad actor. Once evidence 

is submitted through an SEL encrypted 

session, it is immediately encrypted and 

cannot be extracted, is not backed up, 

and is subject to proactive and 

disciplined destruction policies, as well 

as being separated by registered entity.24

NERC explained that it will remove the 

information from the SEL when the 

CMEP engagement concludes.25

20. Finally, as stated by NERC, 

entities can structure their own SELs 

that adhere to their security measure 

requirements. EEI argues that some 

registered entities may be unable to use 

their own SELs to submit compliance 

information if NERC or Regional Entity 

compliance personnel are unable or 

unwilling to meet the SEL security 

access requirements.26 However, EEI 

provides no specific evidence of such 

situations for other CIP compliance 

monitoring engagements or whether 

they have led to increased risk of 

evidence being compromised. We find 

unpersuasive EEI’s objections to NERC’s 

offering of a flexible approach to 

accommodate entities. 

21. Therefore, we find that the 

removal of the evidence retention 

provision in section C.1.1.4 of the 

compliance section of Reliability 

Standard CIP–014–2 will allow NERC to 

monitor compliance more effectively 

without compromising the 

confidentiality of sensitive information. 

Accordingly, we approve NERC’s 

petition and accept the proposed 

Reliability Standard CIP–014–3, to 

become effective on the date of issuance 

of this order. 

IV. Information Collection Statement 

22. In compliance with the 

requirements of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 

3506(c)(2)(A), the Commission is 

soliciting public comment on revisions 

to the information collection FERC– 

725U, Mandatory Reliability Standards 

for the Bulk Power System; CIP 

Reliability Standards; which will be 

submitted to the Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) for a review of the 

information collection requirements. 

Comments on the collection of 

information are due within 60 days of 

the date this order is published in the 

Federal Register. Respondents subject 

to the filing requirements of this order 

will not be penalized for failing to 

respond to these collections of 

information unless the collections of 

information display a valid OMB 

control number. 

23. The information collection 

requirements are subject to review by 

the OMB under section 3507(d) of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.27

OMB’s regulations require approval of 

certain information collection 

requirements imposed by agency 

rules.28 The Commission solicits 

comments on the Commission’s need for 

this information, whether the 

information will have practical utility, 

the accuracy of the burden estimates, 

ways to enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be collected 

or retained, and any suggested methods 

for minimizing respondents’ burden, 

including the use of automated 

information techniques. 

24. The number of respondents below 

is based on an estimate of the NERC 

compliance registry for transmission 

owners and transmission operator. The 

Commission based its paperwork 

burden estimates on the NERC 

compliance registry as of May 6, 2022. 

According to the registry, there are 326 

transmission owners and 18 

transmission operators not also 

registered as transmission owners. The 

estimate is based on a zero change in 

burden from the current standard to the 

standard approved in this Order. The 

Commission based the burden estimate 

on staff experience, knowledge, and 

expertise. 

25. For the new Reliability Standard 

CIP–014–3, the burden for entities 

remains the same as they will still need 

to provide the same evidence to 

demonstrate compliance whether it is 

kept on-site or loaded electronically into 

the SEL. No comments were received 

that expressed a change in the manhour 

burden associated with the use of SEL. 

26. Burden Estimates: The 

Commission estimates the changes in 

the annual public reporting burden and 

cost 29 as indicated below: 

FERC–725U—(MANDATORY RELIABILITY STANDARDS: RELIABILITY STANDARD CIP–014) CHANGE IN BURDEN

Number of 

respondents 30

Number of 

responses per 

respondent 

Total 

number of 

responses 

Average burden hours 

& cost per response 

Total burden hours 

& total cost 

Average 

cost per 

respondent 

(1) (2) (1) * (2) = (3) (4) (3) * (4) = (5) (5) ÷ (1) 

Change Annual Reporting and 

Recordkeeping.

344 1 344 32.71 hrs.; $2,845.77 ..... 11,252.24 hrs.; $978,944.88 ..... $2,845.77 

Total FERC–725U ........................ 344 1 344 32.71 hrs.; $2,845.77 ..... 11,254.24 hrs.; $978,944.88 ..... 2,845.77 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
37850 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 121 / Friday, June 24, 2022 / Notices 

Titles: FERC–725U, Mandatory 

Reliability Standards for the Bulk Power 

System; CIP Reliability Standards. 

Action: Compliance update with no 

changes to Existing Collections of 

Information, FERC–725U. 

OMB Control Nos.: 1902–0274(FERC– 

725U). 

Respondents: Business or other for 

profit, and not for profit institutions. 

Frequency of Responses: On occasion. 

Necessity of the Information: 

Reliability Standard CIP–014–3 

(Physical Security) is part of the 

implementation of the Congressional 

mandate of the Energy Policy Act of 

2005 to develop mandatory and 

enforceable Reliability Standards to 

better ensure the reliability of the 

nation’s Bulk Power system. 

Specifically, the revised standard only 

changes the how the evidence is stored. 

Internal Review: The Commission has 

reviewed NERC’s proposal and 

determined that its action is necessary 

to implement section 215 of the FPA. 

27. Interested persons may obtain 

information on the reporting 

requirements by contacting the Federal 

Energy Regulatory Commission, Office 

of the Executive Director, 888 First 

Street NE, Washington, DC 20426 

[Attention: Ellen Brown, email: 

DataClearance@ferc.gov, phone: (202) 

502–8663]. 

28. All submissions must be formatted 

and filed in accordance with submission 

guidelines at: http://www.ferc.gov. For 

user assistance, contact FERC Online 

Support by email at ferconlinesupport@

ferc.gov, or by phone at (866) 208–3676 

(toll-free). 

29. Comments concerning the 

information collections and 

requirements approved and associated 

burden estimates, should be sent to the 

Commission in this docket and may also 

be sent to the Office of Management and 

Budget, Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs [Attention: Desk 

Officer for the Federal Energy 

Regulatory Commission]. OMB 

submissions must be formatted and filed 

in accordance with submission 

guidelines at www.reginfo.gov/public/ 

do/PRAMain. Using the search function 

under the ‘‘Currently Under Review’’ 

field, select Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission; click ‘‘submit,’’ and select 

‘‘comment’’ to the right of the subject 

collection. 

30. Please refer to the appropriate 

OMB Control Number(s) 1902– 

0274(FERC–725U) in your submission. 

V. Document Availability 

31. In addition to publishing the full 

text of this document in the Federal 

Register, the Commission provides all 

interested persons an opportunity to 

view and/or print the contents of this 

document via the internet through the 

Commission’s Home Page (http://

www.ferc.gov) and in the Commission’s 

Public Reference Room during normal 

business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 

Eastern time) at 888 First Street NE, 

Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426. 

32. From the Commission’s Home 

Page on the internet, this information is 

available on eLibrary. The full text of 

this document is available on eLibrary 

in PDF and Microsoft Word format for 

viewing, printing, and/or downloading. 

To access this document in eLibrary, 

type the docket number excluding the 

last three digits of this document in the 

docket number field. 

33. User assistance is available for 

eLibrary and the Commission’s website 

during normal business hours from the 

Commission’s Online Support at (202) 

502–6652 (toll free at 1–866–208–3676) 

or email at ferconlinesupport@ferc.gov, 

or the Public Reference Room at (202) 

502–8371, TTY (202) 502–8659. Email 

the Public Reference Room at 

public.referenceroom@ferc.gov. 

The Commission orders: 

Reliability Standard CIP–014–3 is 

hereby approved, as discussed in the 

body of this order. 

Issued: June 16, 2022. 

Debbie-Anne A. Reese, 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2022–13464 Filed 6–23–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

Combined Notice of Filings #1 

Take notice that the Commission 

received the following electric corporate 

filings: 

Docket Numbers: EC22–77–000. 

Applicants: Wisconsin River Power 

Company, Wisconsin Power and Light 

Company, Wisconsin Public Service 

Corporation. 

Description: Joint Application for 

Authorization Under Section 203 of the 

Federal Power Act of Wisconsin River 

Power Company, et al. 

Filed Date: 6/16/22. 

Accession Number: 20220616–5185. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 7/7/22. 

Take notice that the Commission 

received the following exempt 

wholesale generator filings: 

Docket Numbers: EG22–146–000. 

Applicants: Invenergy Nelson 

Expansion LLC. 

Description: Invenergy Nelson 

Expansion LLC submits Notice of SelfCertification of Exempt Wholesale 

Generator Status. 

Filed Date: 6/17/22. 

Accession Number: 20220617–5043. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 7/8/22. 

Docket Numbers: EG22–147–000. 

Applicants: Invenergy Nelson LLC. 

Description: Invenergy Nelson LLC 

submits Notice of Self-Certification of 

Exempt Wholesale Generator Status. 

Filed Date: 6/17/22. 

Accession Number: 20220617–5049. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 7/8/22. 

Docket Numbers: EG22–148–000. 

Applicants: West Texas Solar Project 

II LLC. 

Description: Notice of SelfCertification of Exempt Wholesale 

Generator Status of West Texas Solar 

Project II LLC. 

Filed Date: 6/17/22. 

Accession Number: 20220617–5075. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 7/8/22. 

Take notice that the Commission 

received the following electric rate 

filings: 

Docket Numbers: ER11–2366–001. 

Applicants: Lincoln Generating 

Facility, LLC. 

Description: Compliance filing: 

Informational Filing Pursuant to 

Schedule 2 of the PJM OATT & Request 

for Waiver to be effective N/A. 

Filed Date: 6/17/22. 

Accession Number: 20220617–5048. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 7/8/22. 

Docket Numbers: ER11–3110–001. 

Applicants: Crete Energy Venture, 

LLC. 

Description: Compliance filing: 

Informational Filing Pursuant to 

Schedule 2 of the PJM OATT & Request 

for Waiver to be effective N/A. 

Filed Date: 6/17/22. 

Accession Number: 20220617–5046. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 7/8/22. 

Docket Numbers: ER21–55–000. 

Applicants: Mesquite Power, LLC. 

Description: Refund Report: Refund 

Report—Mesquite Power, LLC (ER21– 

55–et al.) to be effective N/A. 

Filed Date: 6/17/22. 

Accession Number: 20220617–5154. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 7/8/22. 

Docket Numbers: ER21–60–000. 

Applicants: PacifiCorp. 

Description: Refund Report: April 18 

Order Refund Report for ER21–60 to be 

effective N/A. 

Filed Date: 6/17/22. 

Accession Number: 20220617–5098. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 7/8/22. 

Docket Numbers: ER22–983–001. 

Applicants: ISO New England Inc., 

New England Power Pool Participants 

Committee. 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1