alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

August 6, 2009 

p0720 

Order 

 

August 6, 2009 

138103 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138103 

 COA: 287348 

Saginaw CC: 03-023547-FC 

SHAY SOLENTO IRWIN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 2, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
HomeEducation

# Tides and Water Levels

The rise and fall of  the tides play an important role in the natural world and can have a marked effect on maritime-related activities. Here, a ship's crew  inspects the hull of their vessel. It became stranded on a sandbar  following a rapidly receding tide.

----

Maritime activities throughout the world depend on accurate tidal and  current information for safe operation. NOAA's National Ocean Service  collects, studies and provides access to thousands of historical and  real-time observations as well as predictions of water levels, coastal  currents and other data.

The Tides and Waters Levels Tutorial is an overview of the complex systems that govern themovement of tides and water levels.

The Roadmap to Resources complements the information in the tutorial by  directing you to additional information and data from NOAA and other  reliable resources.

### Tides and Water Levels

              - Welcome
              - What are Tides?
              - What Causes Tides?
              - Gravity, Inertia, and Bulges
              - Changing Angles and Tides
              - The Frequency of Tides
              - Tidal Variations
              - Types and Causes of Tidal Cycles
              - What Else Affects Tides?
              - Monitoring the Tides
              - Old System
              - New System
              - References
              - Roadmap to Resources 
              - Subject Review

----

National Science Teaching Association (NSTA)

###### **Search** Education

###### Get **Social**

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
DEEPER PORTS, DEEPER POCKETS

One more inch of water in a port means larger ships can enter, bringing millions of dollars worth of additional cargo.
And, carrying more goods in one trip means fewer total trips to ship the same amount of stuff.
With one more inch of depth in a port, a cargo ship could carry about 50 more tractors, 5,000 televisions, 30,000 laptops, or 770,000 bushels of wheat.

Below, see about how much more cargo a ship can carry—and what it's worth—with one more inch of depth in a port.

5,144 "OTHE ATT 31,552.29 772Jam0I8
55” Televisions | « Tractors Laptops Wheat Bushels

| Soo 4

oceanservice.noaa.gov
EXHIBIT 32







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of root9B Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Joseph J. Grano Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to root9B Technologies, Inc., and will be retained by root9B Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








/s/ Joseph J. Grano Jr.


Joseph J. Grano Jr.


Chief Executive Officer


May 15, 2015
Anson CHI, Petitioner v. Andrew STOVER, et al.

No. 19-6228

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 16, 2019

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petition in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin* v. *District of Columbia Court of Appeals* , 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (*per curiam* ).
Photo Credit (left to right): Matt McIntosh, NOAA; Tane Casserley, NOAA; Ed Lyman, NOAA; and Claire Fackler, NOAA

National Marine Sanctuaries Act (NMSA) 

The National Marine Sanctuaries Act (NMSA) regulates the management of national marine sanctuaries which 

are designated special areas set aside for long-term protection, conservation, and management. NMSA prohibits 

injury to sanctuary resources which include any living or non-living resource that contributes to the conservation, 

recreational, ecological, historical, research, educational, or aesthetic value of the sanctuary. Sanctuary 

resources include submerged features and the surrounding sea floor, corals, marine plants and algae, marine 

invertebrates, fish, seabirds, sea turtles and other marine reptiles, marine mammals, and historical resources.

The national marine sanctuary system 

includes 15 national marine sanctuaries 

encompassing more than 600,000 square 

miles of marine and Great Lakes waters from 

Washington state to the Florida Keys, and 

from Lake Huron to American Samoa. They 

contain deep ocean and cold freshwater 

habitats of aquatic life, kelp forests, coral 

reefs, whale migration corridors, deep-sea 

canyons, historically significant shipwrecks, 

and other underwater archaeological sites. 

Each sanctuary is a unique place that has 

been afforded special protection. 
 NOS Consultation with ONMS Under NMSA Section 304(d)

NMSA Section 304(d) requires federal agencies to consult with the Office of National 

Marine Sanctuaries (ONMS) when the agency determines that a proposed action is likely 

to destroy, cause the loss of, or injure a sanctuary resource. The agency must provide 

ONMS a Sanctuary Resource Statement (SRS) describing the proposed action and its 

potential effects on sanctuary resources. 

NOS submitted an SRS covering all 15 national marine sanctuaries to initiate consultation 

with ONMS in June 2022. ONMS informed NOS that the SRS was sufficient for 

consultation in September 2022. In the course of the consultation, ONMS and NOS agreed 

to a suite of mitigation measures to protect sanctuary resources. The consultation was 

completed on April 17, 2023.

Outcomes: NOS will coordinate with ONMS, as appropriate, to determine whether any ONMS permit or 

authorization is required for a project, NOS will always notify ONMS when a project is being conducted in or near 

a sanctuary.

Photo Credit (left to right): Matt McIntosh, NOAA and Ed Lyman, NOAA
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1450 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1450

 To address the concept of ``Too Big To Fail'' with respect to certain 
                          financial entities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 9, 2013

 Mr. Sherman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To address the concept of ``Too Big To Fail'' with respect to certain 
                          financial entities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Too Big to Fail, Too Big to Exist 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REPORT TO CONGRESS ON INSTITUTIONS THAT ARE TOO BIG TO FAIL.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, not later than 90 days 
after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury 
shall submit to Congress a list of all commercial banks, investment 
banks, hedge funds, and insurance companies that the Secretary believes 
are too big to fail, which shall include, but is not limited to, any 
United States bank holding companies that have been identified as 
systemically important banks by the Financial Stability Board (in this 
Act referred to as the ``Too Big to Fail List'').

SEC. 3. BREAKING-UP TOO BIG TO FAIL INSTITUTIONS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, beginning 1 year after 
the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall 
break up entities included on the Too Big To Fail List, so that their 
failure would no longer cause a catastrophic effect on the United 
States or global economy without a taxpayer bailout.

SEC. 4. DEFINITION.

    For purposes of this Act, the term ``Too Big to Fail'' means any 
entity that has grown so large that its failure would have a 
catastrophic effect on the stability of either the financial system or 
the United States economy without substantial Government assistance.
                                 <all>
```
STATE of North Carolina v. William Fredrick HALL.

No. 392P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 12, 2004.

William F. Hall, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 9th day of August 2004 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Guilford County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in Conference this the 12th day of August 2004."
An official website of the United States government.								Here's how you know we're official.				

##### dot gov icon**Official websites use .gov**

A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

##### https icon**Secure websites use HTTPS**

A small lock or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to a .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

National Ocean ServiceNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

              -  Home 
              -  Ocean Facts 
              -  TOPICS ****                  - Explore All Topics
                - Careers
                - Economy
                - Ecosystems
                - Geodesy
                - Hazards
                - Navigation
                - Observations
                - Ocean
                - Recreation
                - Sea Level Rise 
                - Story Maps
                - Tools 
              -  Education 
              -  News 
              -  Podcasts 
              -  Video 
              -  Images 
              -  About Us 

HomeEducationCoralsCoral Diseases

# Yellow-Band Disease

Yellow-band disease can rapidly spread over a coral   destroying the delicate underlying tissues. On the left is a massive coral in   the early stages of attack by yellow-band disease. On the right is the same   coral several weeks later. Note how rapidly the area of destroyed tissue has   expanded.

### Corals Lessons

              - Welcome
              - What are Corals?
              - Zooxanthellae What's That?
              - How Do Stony Corals Grow?
              - How Do Coral Reefs Form?
              - Where Are Coral Reefs Found?
              - How Do Corals Reproduce?
              - Importance of Coral Reefs
              - Natural Threats to Coral Reefs
              - Anthropogenic Threats to Corals
              - Coral Diseases
              - Protecting Coral Reefs
              - References
              - Roadmap to Resources 
              - Subject Review (PDF)

----

National Science Teaching Association (NSTA)

###### **Search** Education

###### Get **Social**

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018222EN.01001701.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 26.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/17 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.8936 — Cinven/Partner in Pet Foods Holdings)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 222/11)

1.

On 15 June 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018222EN.01001701-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Cinven Capital Management (VI) General Partner Limited (UK), belonging to the Cinven group (‘Cinven’), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Partner in Pet Foods Hungaria Kft (Hungary) (‘Partner in Pet Foods’), controlled by Pamplona Capital Partners IV L.P., belonging to Pamplona Capital Management LLP. |

Cinven indirectly acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Partner in Pet Foods.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Cinven: private equity firm engaged in the provision of investment management and investment advisory services. Cinven’s portfolio companies are active in a variety of sectors,

—   for Partner in Pet Foods: manufacture and supply of private label and branded industrial pet food in Europe.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018222EN.01001701-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.8936 — Cinven/Partner in Pet Foods Holdings

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018222EN.01001701-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018222EN.01001701-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
Order entered May 20, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01323-CR

LOUIS RUSSO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 366-80805-2016

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s May 16, 2019 motion to extend the time to file appellant’s 

brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed on or before June 17, 2019. 

If appellant’s brief is not filed by June 17, 2019, this appeal may be abated for the trial court to 

make findings in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 38.8.

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE 

JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 479 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 479

   To direct the Federal Trade Commission to revise the do-not-call 
   telemarketing rules to permit individuals to opt out of receiving 
             certain politically-oriented telephone calls.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 16, 2007

Mr. Doolittle introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To direct the Federal Trade Commission to revise the do-not-call 
   telemarketing rules to permit individuals to opt out of receiving 
             certain politically-oriented telephone calls.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ``DO-NOT-CALL'' REGISTRY FOR CERTAIN POLITICAL TELEPHONE 
              CALLS.

    (a) Regulations.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Federal Trade Commission shall issue 
regulations to revise the Telemarketing Sales Rule (16 C.F.R. 310) to 
prohibit, as an abusive telemarketing act or practice, any politically-
oriented telephone calls to persons who, after such regulations are 
issued, register with the Commission to include their telephone numbers 
on a ``do-not call'' registry established to prohibit such telephone 
calls to such individuals.
    (b) Definition of Politically-Oriented Telephone Calls.--For 
purposes of this section, the term ``politically-oriented telephone 
call'' means any outbound telephone call whose purpose is to promote, 
advertise, campaign for, or solicit donations for or against any 
political candidate.
                                 <all>
```
BRYANT v. RICHARDS

No. COA03-1597

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed February 15, 2005

Certification Date March 7, 2005

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2017029EN.01006901.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 3.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 29/69 |

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/2240 of 12 December 2016 amending Decision 2012/389/CFSP on the European Union Mission on Regional Maritime Capacity Building in the Horn of Africa (EUCAP NESTOR)

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 337 of 13 December 2016](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2016_337_R_TOC)
)

On page 18, Article 1, point (1):

for:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(1) | In the title and throughout the text, the name “EUCAP NESTOR” is replaced by “EUCAP Somalia”.’, |

read:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(1) | The title is replaced by “Council Decision 2012/389/CFSP of 16 July 2012 on the European Union Capacity Building Mission in Somalia (EUCAP Somalia)”, and throughout the text the name “EUCAP NESTOR” is replaced by “EUCAP Somalia”.’. |

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

September 26, 2012

h0919

Order 

September 26, 2012

144842

JANNETTE E. YERGEAU,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144842

COA: 301400

Berrien CC: 2009-000228-NM

DONALD L. BLEICH and BLEICH & MAIS,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

CARL R. BURDICK and BURDICK &

ENGELN, PLC,

Defendants-Appellants.

______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 14, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court prior to the 

completion of the proceedings ordered by the Court of Appeals.