# Official Journal C 346/19 O

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 346 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5819 October 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 346

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5819 October 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2015/C 346/01 | Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2015/C 346/01

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2015/C 346/02 | Case C-296/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Državna revizijska komisija za revizijo postopkov oddaje javnih naročil (Slovenia) lodged on 18 June 2015 — Medisanus d.o.o. v Splošna Bolnišnica Murska Sobota | 2 |
| 2015/C 346/03 | Case C-341/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wien (Austria) lodged on 8 July 2015 — Hans Maschek | 3 |
| 2015/C 346/04 | Case C-360/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 13 July 2015 — College van Burgemeester en Wethouders van de gemeente Amersfoort; other party: X BV | 4 |
| 2015/C 346/05 | Case C-366/15: Action brought on 14 July 2015 — European Commission v Romania | 5 |
| 2015/C 346/06 | Case C-390/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Poland) lodged on 20 July 2015 — Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich (RPO) | 6 |
| 2015/C 346/07 | Case C-391/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Andalucía (Spain) lodged on 20 July 2015 — Marina del Mediterráneo, S.L. and Others v Consejería de Obras Públicas y Vivienda de la Junta de Andalucía | 6 |
| 2015/C 346/08 | Case C-416/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel București (Romania) lodged on 29 July 2015 — Selena România SRL v Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice (DGRFP) București | 7 |
| 2015/C 346/09 | Case C-419/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 30 July 2015 — Thomas Philipps GmbH & Co. KG v Grüne Welle Vertriebs GmbH | 8 |
| 2015/C 346/10 | Case C-420/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles (Belgium) lodged on 30 July 2015 — Criminal proceedings against  U (
  *1
  ) | 9 |
| 2015/C 346/11 | Case C-437/15 P: Appeal brought on 10 August 2015 by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 4 June 2015 in Case T-222/14, Deluxe Laboratories v OHIM (Deluxe) | 9 |
| 2015/C 346/12 | Case C-455/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varbergs tingsrätt (Sweden) lodged on 28 August 2015 — P v Q | 11 |
| 2015/C 346/13 | Case C-459/15 P: Appeal brought on 28 August 2015 by Iranian Offshore Engineering & Construction Company (IOEC) against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 25 June 2015 in Case T-95/14 Iranian Offshore Engineering & Construction Company (IOEC) v Council | 11 |
| | General Court |
| 2015/C 346/14 | Case T-446/10: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2015 — Dow AgroSciences and Dintec Agroquímica — Produtos Químicos v Commission (Plant protection products — Active substance trifluralin — Non-inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC — Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 — Accelerated assessment procedure — Manifest error of assessment — Principle of non-discrimination — Proportionality) | 13 |
| 2015/C 346/15 | Case T-234/12: Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2015 — Amitié v Commission (Arbitration clause — Grant — Financial aid — Suspension of payment — Claim for reimbursement of the declared costs — Damages — Interest on late payment — Debit note — Contractual liability — Counterclaim) | 13 |
| 2015/C 346/16 | Case T-503/12: Judgment of the General Court of 4 September 2015 — United Kingdom v Commission (EAGGF — Guarantee Section — EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Single payment scheme — Key controls — Ancillary controls) | 15 |
| 2015/C 346/17 | Case T-564/12: Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2015 — Ministry of Energy of Iran v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Error of assessment — Breach of fundamental rights — Proportionality) | 15 |
| 2015/C 346/18 | Case T-577/12: Judgment of the General Court of 4 September 2015 — NIOC and Others v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Action for annulment — Infra-State body — Standing to bring proceedings — Admissibility — Obligation to state reasons — Indication and choice of legal basis — Competence of the Council — Principle of foreseeability of European Union acts — Meaning of associated entity — Manifest error of assessment — Rights of defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property) | 16 |
| 2015/C 346/19 | Case T-82/13: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2015 — Panasonic and MT Picture Display v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Global market for cathode ray tubes for television sets and computer monitors — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Agreements and concerted practices on pricing, market sharing, capacity and production — Rights of the defence — Proof of participation in the cartel — Single and continuous infringement — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Proportionality — Fines — Unlimited jurisdiction) | 17 |
| 2015/C 346/20 | Case T-84/13: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2015 — Samsung SDI and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Global market for cathode ray tubes for television sets and computer monitors — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Agreements and concerted practices on pricing, market sharing, capacity and production — Single and continuous infringement — Duration of the infringement — Cooperation during the administrative procedure — 2006 Leniency Notice — Reduction of the fine — Calculation of the fine — Taking account of undertakings’ sales according to the place of delivery — Taking account of the average value of sales recorded during the infringement period) | 18 |
| 2015/C 346/21 | Case T-91/13: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2015 — LG Electronics v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Global market for cathode ray tubes for television sets and computer monitors — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Agreements and concerted practices on pricing, market sharing, capacity and production — Single and continuous infringement — Imputability to a parent company of an infringement committed by a joint venture — Equal treatment — Method of calculating the fine — Taking into account the value of sales of cathode ray tubes through transformed products — Limitation period — Proportionality — Duration of the administrative procedure) | 19 |
| 2015/C 346/22 | Case T-92/13: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2015 — Philips v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Global market for cathode ray tubes for television sets and computer monitors — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Agreements and concerted practices on pricing, market sharing, capacity and production — Single and continuous infringement — Imputability to a parent company of an infringement committed by a joint venture — Equal treatment — Method of calculating the fine — Taking into account the value of sales of cathode ray tubes through transformed products — Taking into account the average value of sales recorded during the infringement — Taking into account the overall turnover of the group — Proportionality — Duration of the administrative procedure) | 20 |
| 2015/C 346/23 | Case T-104/13: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2015 — Toshiba v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Global market for cathode ray tubes for television sets and computer monitors — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Agreements and concerted practices on pricing, market sharing, capacity and production — Proof of participation in the cartel — Single and continuous infringement — Imputability of the infringement — Joint control — Fines — Unlimited jurisdiction) | 21 |
| 2015/C 346/24 | Case T-245/13: Judgment of the General Court of 4 September 2015 — United Kingdom v Commission (EAGGF — Guarantee Section — EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Single payment scheme — Key controls — Ancillary controls — Articles 51, 53, 73 and 73a of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004) | 22 |
| 2015/C 346/25 | Case T-346/13: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2015 — Greece v Commission (EAGGF — ‘Guarantee’ Section — EAGGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Rural development measures — Agri-environment — Adequate checks — Lump-sum financial corrections) | 22 |
| 2015/C 346/26 | Case T-525/13: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2015 — H&M Hennes & Mauritz v OHIM — Yves Saint Laurent (Handbags) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing handbags — Earlier design — Ground for invalidity — Individual character — Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Obligation to state reasons) | 23 |
| 2015/C 346/27 | Case T-526/13: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2015 — H&M Hennes & Mauritz v OHIM — Yves Saint Laurent (Handbags) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing handbags — Earlier design — Ground for invalidity — Individual character — Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Obligation to state reasons) | 24 |
| 2015/C 346/28 | Case T-714/13: Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2015 — Gold Crest v OHIM (MIGHTY BRIGHT) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community word mark MIGHTY BRIGHT — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 25 |
| 2015/C 346/29 | Case T-168/14: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2015 — Pérez Gutiérrez v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Public health — Directive 2011/37/EC — Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products — Colour photographs proposed by the Commission as health warnings to appear on tobacco packages — Decision 2003/641/EC — Unauthorised use of the image of a deceased person — Harm suffered personally by the widow of the deceased person) | 25 |
| 2015/C 346/30 | Case T-225/14: Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2015 — iNET24 Holding v OHIM (IDIRECT24) (Community trade mark — International registration designating the European Community — Word mark IDIRECT24 — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009) | 26 |
| 2015/C 346/31 | Case T-254/14: Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2015 — Warenhandelszentrum v OHIM — Baumarkt Max Bahr (NEW MAX) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the figurative Community trade mark NEW MAX — Earlier figurative Community trade mark MAX — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 27 |
| 2015/C 346/32 | Case T-278/14: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2015 — Dairek Attoumi v OHIM — Diesel (DIESEL) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design DIESEL — Earlier international word mark DIESEL — Ground for invalidity — Use of a distinctive sign — Likelihood of confusion — Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Proof of genuine use — Stay of the administrative proceedings) | 28 |
| 2015/C 346/33 | Case T-530/14: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2015 — Verein StHD v OHIM (Representation of a black ribbon) (Community trade mark — Application for Community figurative mark representing a black ribbon — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 28 |
| 2015/C 346/34 | Case T-584/14: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2015 — Inditex v OHIM — Ansell (ZARA) (Community trade mark — Proceedings for revocation — Community word mark ZARA — Genuine use — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 29 |
| 2015/C 346/35 | Case T-660/14: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2015 — SV Capital v EBA (Economic and monetary policy — Application to initiate an investigation for an alleged breach of EU law — Decision of the EBA — Decision of the Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities — Finding of the Court of its own motion — Lack of competence of the author of the act — Action for annulment — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Delay — Partly inadmissible) | 30 |
| 2015/C 346/36 | Case T-344/15 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 1 September 2015 — France v Commission (Application for interim measures — Access to documents of the institutions — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents sent by the French authorities to the Commission in accordance with the procedure laid down in Directive 98/34/EC — France’s objection to disclosure of the documents — Decision to grant a third party access to the documents — Application for suspension of operation — Urgency — Prima facie case — Weighing up of interests) | 30 |
| 2015/C 346/37 | Case T-367/15: Action brought on 9 July 2015 — Renfe-Operadora v OHIM (AVE) | 31 |
| 2015/C 346/38 | Case T-472/15 P: Appeal brought on 13 August 2015 by European External Action Service (EEAS) against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 3 June 2015 in Case F-78/14, Gross v EEAS | 32 |
| 2015/C 346/39 | Case T-478/15: Action brought on 21 August 2015 — Romania v Commission | 33 |
| 2015/C 346/40 | Case T-501/15: Action brought on 31 August 2015 — Netherlands v Commission | 35 |
| 2015/C 346/41 | Case T-502/15: Action brought on 1 September 2015 — Spain v Commission | 36 |
| | European Union Civil Service Tribunal |
| 2015/C 346/42 | Case F-28/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (2nd Chamber) of 9 September 2015 — De Loecker v EEAS (Civil service — EEAS staff — Member of the temporary staff — Head of delegation in a third country — Breakdown in the relationship of trust — Transfer to the EEAS seat — Early termination of the employment contract — Period of notice — Reasons given for the decision — Article 26 of the Staff Regulations — Rights of the defence — Right to be heard) | 38 |
| 2015/C 346/43 | Case F-9/15: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 7 September 2015 — Verhelst v EMA | 38 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2015/C 346/02

Case C-296/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Državna revizijska komisija za revizijo postopkov oddaje javnih naročil (Slovenia) lodged on 18 June 2015 — Medisanus d.o.o. v Splošna Bolnišnica Murska Sobota

2

2015/C 346/03

Case C-341/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wien (Austria) lodged on 8 July 2015 — Hans Maschek

3

2015/C 346/04

Case C-360/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 13 July 2015 — College van Burgemeester en Wethouders van de gemeente Amersfoort; other party: X BV

4

2015/C 346/05

Case C-366/15: Action brought on 14 July 2015 — European Commission v Romania

5

2015/C 346/06

Case C-390/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Poland) lodged on 20 July 2015 — Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich (RPO)

6

2015/C 346/07

Case C-391/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Andalucía (Spain) lodged on 20 July 2015 — Marina del Mediterráneo, S.L. and Others v Consejería de Obras Públicas y Vivienda de la Junta de Andalucía

6

2015/C 346/08

Case C-416/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel București (Romania) lodged on 29 July 2015 — Selena România SRL v Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice (DGRFP) București

7

2015/C 346/09

Case C-419/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 30 July 2015 — Thomas Philipps GmbH & Co. KG v Grüne Welle Vertriebs GmbH

8

2015/C 346/10

Case C-420/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles (Belgium) lodged on 30 July 2015 — Criminal proceedings against  U (
  *1
  )

*1

9

2015/C 346/11

Case C-437/15 P: Appeal brought on 10 August 2015 by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 4 June 2015 in Case T-222/14, Deluxe Laboratories v OHIM (Deluxe)

9

2015/C 346/12

Case C-455/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varbergs tingsrätt (Sweden) lodged on 28 August 2015 — P v Q

11

2015/C 346/13

Case C-459/15 P: Appeal brought on 28 August 2015 by Iranian Offshore Engineering & Construction Company (IOEC) against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 25 June 2015 in Case T-95/14 Iranian Offshore Engineering & Construction Company (IOEC) v Council

11

General Court

2015/C 346/14

Case T-446/10: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2015 — Dow AgroSciences and Dintec Agroquímica — Produtos Químicos v Commission (Plant protection products — Active substance trifluralin — Non-inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC — Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 — Accelerated assessment procedure — Manifest error of assessment — Principle of non-discrimination — Proportionality)

13

2015/C 346/15

Case T-234/12: Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2015 — Amitié v Commission (Arbitration clause — Grant — Financial aid — Suspension of payment — Claim for reimbursement of the declared costs — Damages — Interest on late payment — Debit note — Contractual liability — Counterclaim)

13

2015/C 346/16

Case T-503/12: Judgment of the General Court of 4 September 2015 — United Kingdom v Commission (EAGGF — Guarantee Section — EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Single payment scheme — Key controls — Ancillary controls)

15

2015/C 346/17

Case T-564/12: Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2015 — Ministry of Energy of Iran v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Error of assessment — Breach of fundamental rights — Proportionality)

15

2015/C 346/18

Case T-577/12: Judgment of the General Court of 4 September 2015 — NIOC and Others v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Action for annulment — Infra-State body — Standing to bring proceedings — Admissibility — Obligation to state reasons — Indication and choice of legal basis — Competence of the Council — Principle of foreseeability of European Union acts — Meaning of associated entity — Manifest error of assessment — Rights of defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property)

16

2015/C 346/19

Case T-82/13: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2015 — Panasonic and MT Picture Display v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Global market for cathode ray tubes for television sets and computer monitors — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Agreements and concerted practices on pricing, market sharing, capacity and production — Rights of the defence — Proof of participation in the cartel — Single and continuous infringement — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Proportionality — Fines — Unlimited jurisdiction)

17

2015/C 346/20

Case T-84/13: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2015 — Samsung SDI and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Global market for cathode ray tubes for television sets and computer monitors — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Agreements and concerted practices on pricing, market sharing, capacity and production — Single and continuous infringement — Duration of the infringement — Cooperation during the administrative procedure — 2006 Leniency Notice — Reduction of the fine — Calculation of the fine — Taking account of undertakings’ sales according to the place of delivery — Taking account of the average value of sales recorded during the infringement period)

18

2015/C 346/21

Case T-91/13: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2015 — LG Electronics v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Global market for cathode ray tubes for television sets and computer monitors — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Agreements and concerted practices on pricing, market sharing, capacity and production — Single and continuous infringement — Imputability to a parent company of an infringement committed by a joint venture — Equal treatment — Method of calculating the fine — Taking into account the value of sales of cathode ray tubes through transformed products — Limitation period — Proportionality — Duration of the administrative procedure)

19

2015/C 346/22

Case T-92/13: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2015 — Philips v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Global market for cathode ray tubes for television sets and computer monitors — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Agreements and concerted practices on pricing, market sharing, capacity and production — Single and continuous infringement — Imputability to a parent company of an infringement committed by a joint venture — Equal treatment — Method of calculating the fine — Taking into account the value of sales of cathode ray tubes through transformed products — Taking into account the average value of sales recorded during the infringement — Taking into account the overall turnover of the group — Proportionality — Duration of the administrative procedure)

20

2015/C 346/23

Case T-104/13: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2015 — Toshiba v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Global market for cathode ray tubes for television sets and computer monitors — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Agreements and concerted practices on pricing, market sharing, capacity and production — Proof of participation in the cartel — Single and continuous infringement — Imputability of the infringement — Joint control — Fines — Unlimited jurisdiction)

21

2015/C 346/24

Case T-245/13: Judgment of the General Court of 4 September 2015 — United Kingdom v Commission (EAGGF — Guarantee Section — EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Single payment scheme — Key controls — Ancillary controls — Articles 51, 53, 73 and 73a of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004)

22

2015/C 346/25

Case T-346/13: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2015 — Greece v Commission (EAGGF — ‘Guarantee’ Section — EAGGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Rural development measures — Agri-environment — Adequate checks — Lump-sum financial corrections)

22

2015/C 346/26

Case T-525/13: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2015 — H&M Hennes & Mauritz v OHIM — Yves Saint Laurent (Handbags) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing handbags — Earlier design — Ground for invalidity — Individual character — Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Obligation to state reasons)

23

2015/C 346/27

Case T-526/13: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2015 — H&M Hennes & Mauritz v OHIM — Yves Saint Laurent (Handbags) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing handbags — Earlier design — Ground for invalidity — Individual character — Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Obligation to state reasons)

24

2015/C 346/28

Case T-714/13: Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2015 — Gold Crest v OHIM (MIGHTY BRIGHT) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community word mark MIGHTY BRIGHT — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

25

2015/C 346/29

Case T-168/14: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2015 — Pérez Gutiérrez v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Public health — Directive 2011/37/EC — Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products — Colour photographs proposed by the Commission as health warnings to appear on tobacco packages — Decision 2003/641/EC — Unauthorised use of the image of a deceased person — Harm suffered personally by the widow of the deceased person)

25

2015/C 346/30

Case T-225/14: Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2015 — iNET24 Holding v OHIM (IDIRECT24) (Community trade mark — International registration designating the European Community — Word mark IDIRECT24 — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)

26

2015/C 346/31

Case T-254/14: Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2015 — Warenhandelszentrum v OHIM — Baumarkt Max Bahr (NEW MAX) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the figurative Community trade mark NEW MAX — Earlier figurative Community trade mark MAX — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

27

2015/C 346/32

Case T-278/14: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2015 — Dairek Attoumi v OHIM — Diesel (DIESEL) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design DIESEL — Earlier international word mark DIESEL — Ground for invalidity — Use of a distinctive sign — Likelihood of confusion — Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Proof of genuine use — Stay of the administrative proceedings)

28

2015/C 346/33

Case T-530/14: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2015 — Verein StHD v OHIM (Representation of a black ribbon) (Community trade mark — Application for Community figurative mark representing a black ribbon — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

28

2015/C 346/34

Case T-584/14: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2015 — Inditex v OHIM — Ansell (ZARA) (Community trade mark — Proceedings for revocation — Community word mark ZARA — Genuine use — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

29

2015/C 346/35

Case T-660/14: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2015 — SV Capital v EBA (Economic and monetary policy — Application to initiate an investigation for an alleged breach of EU law — Decision of the EBA — Decision of the Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities — Finding of the Court of its own motion — Lack of competence of the author of the act — Action for annulment — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Delay — Partly inadmissible)

30

2015/C 346/36

Case T-344/15 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 1 September 2015 — France v Commission (Application for interim measures — Access to documents of the institutions — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents sent by the French authorities to the Commission in accordance with the procedure laid down in Directive 98/34/EC — France’s objection to disclosure of the documents — Decision to grant a third party access to the documents — Application for suspension of operation — Urgency — Prima facie case — Weighing up of interests)

30

2015/C 346/37

Case T-367/15: Action brought on 9 July 2015 — Renfe-Operadora v OHIM (AVE)

31

2015/C 346/38

Case T-472/15 P: Appeal brought on 13 August 2015 by European External Action Service (EEAS) against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 3 June 2015 in Case F-78/14, Gross v EEAS

32

2015/C 346/39

Case T-478/15: Action brought on 21 August 2015 — Romania v Commission

33

2015/C 346/40

Case T-501/15: Action brought on 31 August 2015 — Netherlands v Commission

35

2015/C 346/41

Case T-502/15: Action brought on 1 September 2015 — Spain v Commission

36

European Union Civil Service Tribunal

2015/C 346/42

Case F-28/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (2nd Chamber) of 9 September 2015 — De Loecker v EEAS (Civil service — EEAS staff — Member of the temporary staff — Head of delegation in a third country — Breakdown in the relationship of trust — Transfer to the EEAS seat — Early termination of the employment contract — Period of notice — Reasons given for the decision — Article 26 of the Staff Regulations — Rights of the defence — Right to be heard)

38

2015/C 346/43

Case F-9/15: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 7 September 2015 — Verhelst v EMA

38

---

| | |
| --- | --- |

---

| EN | For reasons of protection of personal data, some information contained in this issue cannot be disclosed anymore, therefore a new authentic version has been published. |
| --- | --- |

EN

For reasons of protection of personal data, some information contained in this issue cannot be disclosed anymore, therefore a new authentic version has been published.