alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Theodore G. Hollinger, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

         1.   I have reviewed this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Hydrogen
              Engine Center, Inc.;

         2.   Based on my  knowledge,  this  report  does not contain any untrue
              statement  of a  material  fact or omit to state a  material  fact
              necessary  to  make  the   statements   made,   in  light  of  the
              circumstances   under  which  such   statements   were  made,  not
              misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3.   Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other
              financial  information included in this report,  fairly present in
              all  material  respects  the  financial   condition,   results  of
              operations  and cash flows of the  registrant  as of, and for, the
              periods presented in this report;

         4.   The registrant's  other  certifying  officer and I have disclosed,
              based on our most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over
              financial  reporting,  to the registrant's  auditors and the audit
              committee  of the  registrant's  board of  directors  (or  persons
              performing the equivalent functions):

              a.   All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the
                   design  or  operation  of  internal  control  over  financial
                   reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
                   registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
                   financial information; and

              b.   Any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management
                   or  other  employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in the
                   registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 August 14, 2006                             /s/ Theodore G. Hollinger
                                             -------------------------------
                                             Theodore G. Hollinger
                                             Chief Executive Officer
Christopher Brian ROGERS, Petitioner v. Tammatha SOSS, Acting Warden

No. 19-6950

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 21, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
MANDATE

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-15-00253-CV

Jimmy Diaz, Appellant

v.

A.M. Stringfellow Unit, et al., 

Appellees

Appealed from the 215th District Court 

of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2014-

68893). Opinion delivered Per Curiam.

TO THE 215TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals on April 23, 2015, the cause upon appeal to 

revise or reverse your judgment was determined. Our Court of Appeals made its 

order in these words:

Today the Court heard appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

order signed by the court below on March 20, 2015. Having considered the motion 

and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, Jimmy Diaz.

We further order that mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said 

Court in this behalf and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Kem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice of our Fourteenth 

Court of Appeals, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Houston, April 24, 

2015.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

for the Fifth Circuit

_____________________________________

No. 98-50082

Summary Calendar

_____________________________________

 TOYA TAYLOR,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

SERGIOS SALON & SPA,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(SA-97-CV-334)

______________________________________________________

July 24, 1998

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant Toya Taylor challenges the district court's summary

judgment order dismissing her Title VII action seeking damages for

discriminatory discharge as manager of Appellee's salon. Taylor

alleges that she was terminated at least in part because she is

black.

The Appellee gave a number of reasons for discharging Ms.
2

Taylor. In general, the employer asserted that she received

several complaints from customers and other employees that Ms.

Taylor's work was deficient. More particularly, the employer

alleged that Ms. Taylor: (l) had left the salon for long periods of

time without permission; (2) had shortages in the cash register;

(3) failed to comply with the dress code; (4) had not accounted for

petty cash withdrawals; (5) had other employees close the salon;

and (6) had her hair done at other salons on company time.

In attempting to show that the employer's stated reasons for

her discharge were pretextual, Ms. Taylor's primary argument is

that no employee from her protected class has been fired for the

reasons stated by the employer. However, Ms. Taylor provided no

competent summary judgment evidence of other employees not in her

protected class who had committed similar infractions. Ms. Taylor

also admitted that before her termination the employer counseled

her about those violations. She does not dispute the employer's

summary judgment evidence that she was only terminated after

subsequent violations occurred. 

Assuming without deciding that Ms. Taylor stated a prima facie

case, we agree with the district court that the employer stated

adequate, non-discriminatory grounds for discharging Ms. Taylor and

Ms. Taylor's summary judgment evidence was insufficient to show

that those reasons were pretextual. 

For the above reasons, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
(a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, was made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report was being prepared;
 (b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 (c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 (d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal year that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /S/ STANTON NELSON

Stanton NelsonChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-2123

ZHIHUA YAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ARLINGTON ASYLUM OFFICE USCIS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:23-cv-00617-FDW-DCK)

Submitted: February 27, 2024 Decided: February 29, 2024

Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Zhihua Yan, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-2123 Doc: 12 Filed: 02/29/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Zhihua Yan, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, appeals the 

district court’s order dismissing his petition for writ of mandamus seeking an order 

directing Defendant to adjudicate his pending asylum application. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. 

Zhihua Yan v. Arlington Asylum Off. USCIS, No. 3:23-cv-00617-FDW-DCK (W.D.N.C. 

Oct. 6, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-2123 Doc: 12 Filed: 02/29/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000873637
<NAME> Pacific Portfolio
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER>004
   <NAME>Smith Barney World Funds, Inc.

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 Oct-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                      Oct-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>               6,103,413
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>              6,202,575
<RECEIVABLES>                         373,401
<ASSETS-OTHER>                        581,017
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      7,156,993
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                    0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>             871,656
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                   871,656
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                             0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>            8,849,158
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                 281,144
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                 415,681
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                   0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                      0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>            (2,657,616)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                    0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>               93,795
<NET-ASSETS>                        6,285,337
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                      36,133
<INTEREST-INCOME>                      35,628
<OTHER-INCOME>                              0
<EXPENSES-NET>                        230,127
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>              (158,366)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>              884,677
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>          (4,452,061)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>              (3,725,750)
<EQUALIZATION>                              0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>              62,517
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                    0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                       0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>             3,375,808
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>         3,514,885
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                     4,540
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>             (6,628,414)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>              (134,587)
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>          (3,404,226)
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                     0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                  0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                  99,188
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                       321,196
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                3,987,541
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                  11.800
<PER-SHARE-NII>                        (0.100)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                (4.110)
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                    0.150
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>               0.000
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                    0.000
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                     7.440
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                          1.47



</TABLE>
STATE v. Terrance BOWMAN.

No. 142A97-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 3, 2005.

Seth A. Blum, Raleigh, for Bowman.

Ralf F. Haskell, Special Deputy Attorney General, C. Branson Vickory, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th day of September 2004 by Defendant for Relief:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of March 2005."
STATE of North Carolina v. Floyd Patterson VINCENT, Jr.

No. 644P03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 4, 2004.

Paul M. James, Assistant Public Defender, for Vincent.

Anne Middleton, Assistant Attorney General, Carl R. Fox, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th day of December 2003 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of March 2004."
maneras para

proteger los

A los corales les toma décadas crecer y formar 

estructuras coralinas. Déjelos en su lugar.

Bombillas 

de

Practique navegación

No arroje

químicos

por las 

tuberías

Aprenda a hacer decisiones 

informadas sobre su consumo.

www.FishWatch.gov 

¡Sea voluntario!

10

Sea un consumidor responsable

El exceso de

químicos aumenta 

el crecimiento de

algas, lo que 

bloquea la luz

Los arrecifes de coral son seres vivos. 

Sedimento suelto puede sofocarlos.

Participe de recogidos 

de basura o limpiezas 

Ancle su bote en fondos

arenosos, lejos de los corales 

y hierbas marinas. Asegúrese

que la cadena y el ancla

estén lejos de los corales.

Además de recoger su basura, 

ayude a recoger lo que otros 

olvidaron. 

Si buceas,

SEA UN ACTIVISTA 

DEL MEDIOAMBIENTE

El cambio climático 

amenaza la vida 

de los corales. 

Las bombillas de

bajo consumo

la emisión de CO2.

EDÚQUESE

sobre los arrecifes de coral

y su importacia ecológica.

Arrecifes

de Coral

Spanish translation courtesy of

de arrecifes. 

No regale

corales

BAJO

CONSUMO ayudan a reducir

NO TOQUE

solar a los 

corales. 

Caribbean Fishery Management Council

segura

Al estar bien informado puede

ayudar a otros entender el

valor y la fragilidad de los 

corales en nuestro ecosistema. 

VERIFIQUE LOS INGREDIENTES

ACTIVOS DE SU BLOQUEADOR

Búsque sombra entre 10 a.m. y 2 p.m.

Use bloqueador con protección ultravioleta (UPF) 

y asegúrese que sus químicos no perjudiquen

la vida marina. Para más información

visite oceanservice.noaa.gov/sunscreen.

www.caribbeanfmc.com
HomeOcean Facts

# What is the difference between land cover and land use?

## Land cover indicates the physical land type such as forest or open water whereas land use documents how people are using the  land

By comparing land cover data and maps over a  period of time, coastal managers can document land use trends and changes.

Land cover data documents how much of a region is covered by  forests, wetlands, impervious surfaces, agriculture, and other land and water  types. Water types include wetlands or open water. Land use shows how people use  the landscape – whether for development, conservation, or mixed uses. The  different types of land cover can be managed or used quite differently. 

Land cover can be determined by analyzing satellite and  aerial imagery. Land use cannot be determined from satellite imagery. Land  cover maps provide information to help managers best understand the current  landscape. To see change over time, land cover maps for several different years  are needed. With this information, managers can evaluate past management  decisions as well as gain insight into the possible effects of their current  decisions before they are implemented. 

Coastal managers use land cover data and maps to better  understand the impacts of natural phenomena and human use of the landscape. Maps  can help managers assess urban growth, model water quality issues, predict and  assess impacts from floods and storm surges, track wetland losses and potential  impacts from sea level rise, prioritize areas for conservation efforts, and compare  land cover changes with effects in the environment or to connections in  socioeconomic changes such as increasing population.

###### Get **Social**

###### More **Information**

          - Office for Coastal Management
          - Diving Deeper (audio podcast)

**Last updated:**   01/18/24**Author:** NOAAHow to cite this article

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
In the Matter of ORDER-STATE BAR.

No. 71P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 3, 2005.

Carolin Bakewell, Raleigh, for N.C. State Bar.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th day of January 2005 by Respondent (Edward Brooks) to Compel Enforcement of Mandates of this Court's Orders:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of February 2005."
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4795 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4795

  To extend the suspension of duty on mixtures of difenoconazole and 
                               mefenoxam.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 18, 2007

  Mr. Coble introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the suspension of duty on mixtures of difenoconazole and 
                               mefenoxam.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF DIFENOCONAZOLE AND MEFENOXAM.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.12.53 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to mixtures of difenoconazole 
and mefenoxam) is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and by inserting 
``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# Official Journal L 123/2008

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 123 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 518 May 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 123

English edition

Legislation

Volume 518 May 2008

---

| Contents | | II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | Commission |
| | | 2008/333/EC |
| | * | Commission Decision of 4 March 2008 adopting the SIRENE Manual and other implementing measures for the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II)
  (notified under document number C(2008) 774) | 1 |
| | | 2008/334/JHA |
| | * | Commission Decision of 4 March 2008 adopting the SIRENE Manual and other implementing measures for the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) | 39 |
| | | 2008/335/EC |
| | * | Commission Decision of 28 March 2008 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, a first updated list of sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region
  (notified under document number C(2008) 1148) | 76 |

Contents

II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory

page

DECISIONS

Commission

2008/333/EC

*

Commission Decision of 4 March 2008 adopting the SIRENE Manual and other implementing measures for the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II)
  (notified under document number C(2008) 774)

(notified under document number C(2008) 774)

1

2008/334/JHA

*

Commission Decision of 4 March 2008 adopting the SIRENE Manual and other implementing measures for the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II)

39

2008/335/EC

*

Commission Decision of 28 March 2008 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, a first updated list of sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region
  (notified under document number C(2008) 1148)

(notified under document number C(2008) 1148)

76

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
HOME SAVINGS BANK v. COLONIAL AMERICAN.

No. 505P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 3, 2005.

James G. Exum, Jr., T. Keith Black, Greensboro, Thomas S. Schaufelberger, Washington, DC, for Colonial American Casualty.

David L. Brown, Esq., Greensboro, for Home Savings Bank, et al.

Michael T. Wood, for Surety Association of America.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 14th day of October 2004 by Surety Association of America for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

> "Motion Dismissed as moot. By order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of February 2005."
Manuel Antonio SEVERINO, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6840

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.