alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4809 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Fipronil. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 18, 2007 

Mr. HULSHOF introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Fipronil. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FIPRONIL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.24.16 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amend6 ed— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘Free’’ and inserting ‘‘5.2%’’; 

8 and 

9 (2) by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

12 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4809 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Cedric Sharrod WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6849

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Global Warming — 

What’s Your

Score?

In the United States, a typical 

household of two people 

generates approximately 

41,500 pounds of carbon 

dioxide (CO2) emissions 

every year from household 

activities and personal 

transportation.

Pounds of CO

Emitted Per Y

Emissions Sou

Office of Air and Radiation

Office of Atmospheric

EPA-430-F-08-010

June 2008

United States 

Environmental Protection 

Agency

Office of Air and Radiation 

Office of Atmospheric 

Programs

EPA-430-F-08-010

June 2008

Emissions Sou

Pounds of CO

Emitted Per Y
Actions You Can Take Global Warmin

What Can You Do?

If you took all of the actions on this wheel card, 

you could save 14,400 pounds of 

carbon dioxide (CO2) annually 

and over $1,600 from your 

annual home energy bill 

and gasoline costs.

Resources

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency climate change website: www.epa.gov/climatechange 

Energy Star website: www.energystar.gov

For more precise calculations and a summary of assumptions used in this wheel card: www.epa.gov/climatechange/calc 

Pounds of CO

You Can Sa

Actions You Can 

Pounds of CO

You Can Sa
1,100 lbs./year 

700 lbs./year

300 lbs./year miles 10 gets that vehicle a •	 Buy

your than more gallon per

one. current

you miles of number the •	 Reduce

by week per miles 25 by drive

carpooling, biking, walking,

taking or trips, combining

instead. transit mass

•	 Recycle half of your potentially

recyclable materials (paper,plastics, glass, magazines,aluminum and steel cans).

•	 Reduce your waste generation

by 25 percent.

•	 Replace 10 75-watt incandescent

light bulbs with 20-watt Energy

Star lights.

•	 Replace old refrigerator witha

new Energy Star model.

•	 Turn up your air conditioner’s

thermostat by2 degrees

Fahrenheit in summer.

3,600 lbs./year 

900 lbs./year

•	 Turn down your heating thermostat by 8 degrees Fahrenheit on

winter nights.

•	 Replace single-glazed windows

with Energy Star windows.

•	 Replace your old gas or oil

furnace or boiler with anEnergy Star model.

900 lbs./year 

3,000 lbs./year3,000 lbs./year

500400 lbs./year 

lbs./year

Home Heating

Transportation

Electricity Use

Global Warming — 

What Can You Do?

Waste Disposal
7,700 lbs./year 

lbs./year 15,500

31,000 lbs./year On average, how many miles do

you put on your car(s) per week?

If you have more than one car, use

the total number of miles per

week for all your cars.

•	 200 miles

•	 400 miles

•	 600 miles

What is your average monthlyheating bill? Pick closestamount.•	 $50•	 $100•	 $200

Which of the following scenariosbest describes your household’swaste disposal practices?•	 We don’t recycle at all.•	 We recycle about half of all

recyclable materials (paper, plastics, glass, magazines, aluminumand steel cans).

•	 We recycle everything we can.

monthly average your is What

amount. closest Pick bill? electric

•	 $50

•	 $100

•	 $200

10,800 lbs./year

21,600 lbs./year

32,300 lbs./year

2,000 lbs./year1,100 lbs./year1,600 lbs./year

5,100 lbs./year

10,200 lbs./year20,500 lbs./year

Waste Disposal

Transportation

Electricity Use

Home Heating

Global Warming — 

What’s Your Score?
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 DORIAN E. RAMIREZ

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

October 7, 2015

Hon. Luis V. Saenz

District Attorney

964 E. Harrison

Brownsville, TX 78520-7123

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Edmund K. Cyganiewicz

Attorney At Law

1000 E. Madison St.

Brownsville, TX 78520

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13-14-00675-CR

Tr.Ct.No. 2014-DCR-215-E

Style: Edgar Garces Diaz v. The State of Texas

Enclosed please find a copy of an order issued by this Court on this date.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER:ch

Enc.
TRAVELERS SERIES FUND INC.
on behalf of the 
AIM Capital Appreciation Portfolio
Supplement dated December 17, 1996 to 
Prospectus dated February 28, 1996


	On November 4, 1996, AIM Management Group, Inc. ("AIM") announced it had 
entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with INVESCO PLC ("INVESCO") 
pursuant to which AIM will be merged with and into INVESCO. The AIM Capital 
Appreciation Portfolio's (the "Portfolio") Sub-Adviser, A I M Capital 
Management, Inc. (the "Sub-Adviser"), is a wholly owned subsidiary of AIM.

	The proposed transaction may be deemed to cause an assignment, within 
the meaning of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the Investment Advisers 
Act of 1940, of the investment subadvisory agreement between Travelers Series 
Fund Inc. (the "Fund") on behalf of the Portfolio, Travelers Investment 
Adviser, Inc. (the "Manager") and the Sub-Adviser. Under its terms, the 
Portfolio's current investment subadvisory agreement will automatically 
terminate upon the transfer of control of the Sub-Adviser from AIM to INVESCO. 
The Fund's Board of Directors has considered and approved the Sub-Adviser's 
continued role as investment Sub-Adviser to the Portfolio pursuant to a new 
investment subadvisory agreement. The terms, including the investment 
subadvisory fee, of the new investment subadvisory agreement are the same in 
all material respects as those of the current investment subadvisory 
agreement. In addition, management anticipates that the key personnel 
responsible for providing services to the Portfolio will remain unchanged.  A 
new investment subadvisory agreement will not become effective, however, until 
the shareholders of the Portfolio vote to approve its terms.  The Board of 
Directors has also approved calling a special meeting of shareholders to 
consider and approve the investment subadvisory fees under the new investment 
subadvisory agreement.  The meeting is scheduled to be held on February 7, 
1997.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4873 

To suspend temporarily the duty on p-Amino Benzoic Acid. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2007 

Mr. CLAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on p-Amino Benzoic Acid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. P-AMINO BENZOIC ACID. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.l.l p-Amino Benzoic Acid (CAS 

No. 150–13–0) (provided for 

in subheading 2922.49.10) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4873 IH

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50378

RUDY VAN WILLIAMS

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

OFFICER FNU RAMIREZ, Gang Intelligents Officer

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:05-cv-00491

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Defendant-Appellant Officer Ramirez brings this interlocutory appeal to

challenge the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss and/or for summary

judgment based on qualified immunity. Because genuine issues of material fact

remain to be resolved, we have no jurisdiction to decide this interlocutory appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 11, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

PHARMACOPEIA, INC.

 

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Pharmacopeia, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, BrianM. Posner, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (PrincipalFinancial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer) of the Company, hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| By:    | /s/ Brian M. Posner                                        |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Brian M. Posner                                            |
|   | Executive Vice President,                                  |
|   | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer                      |
|   | (Principal Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer) |
|   | July 31, 2008                                         |

 

----
EXHIBIT 10.9

                                PERIMETER REALTY
                                 P. O. BOX 1420
                              PORTLAND, MAINE 04104


March 23, 2006

Bruce Reeves, Chief Executive Officer
AssureTec Systems, Inc.
200 Perimeter Road,
Manchester, New Hampshire 03103

Re:  a.   Lease dated May 22, 2002 between Perimeter Realty and AssureTec
          Systems, Inc., at 200 Perimeter Road.

     b.   AssureTec take over of approximately 1200 sq ft of office space
          section now occupied by Nutmeg Container.

Dear Bruce,

This letter confirms our meeting today concerning your occupancy of the above
referenced office now occupied by Nutmeg Container for storage purposes.

Term:
AssureTec will take over 1200 sq ft subject office space from commencement date
June 1, 2006 through June 30, 2008, subject to Nutmeg vacating same, said 1200
sq ft being added to AssureTec space under the existing lease dated May 22,
2002.

Base rent:
$5.00 NNN per sq ft on an "as is" basis as to the 1200 feet added to space.

Existing referenced lease:
The current AssureTec lease, dated May 22, 2002, now in its option period,
expiring June 30, 2007, said lease is extended to June 30, 2008 with the same
terms and conditions including same $7.00 NNN per sq ft rate on original space
and $5.00 NNN on this added 1200 sq ft.

Option to renew:
The existing lease is hereby also amended to add an additional three year option
period at the current base rental rates ($7.00 NNN existing space and $5.00 NNN
on the space added hereby) on both spaces plus 3% increases yearly commencing on
July 1, 2008, provided tenant exercises such option by written notice to
Landlord by October 1, 2007.


                                Page 1 of 2 pages
<PAGE>


page 2, ltr dated 3/23/06, subject: additional 1200 sq ft office space to
AssureTec



Perimeter Realty work:
Install commercial grade carpeting in the additional1200 sq ft space. Install an
8,000 BTU thru-the-wall air conditioner. Otherwise space is added to AssureTec
on an "as is" basis.


NOTE:
It is agreed that if AssureTec does not exercise its option to renew, it will
reimburse Perimeter for 1/3 of its cost of the carpet and air conditioner.


This letter agreement shall be regarded as an amendment hereby to the May 22,
2002 lease, which lease except as amended, is otherwise in full force and
effect. This Amendment, in so far as the 1200 sq ft is concerned, is subject to
Nutmeg, by June 1, 2006 vacating and surrendering the 1200 sq ft described and
otherwise remaining an occupant under lease as to the more than 30,000 sq ft
demised to it.



                                               BERNARD M. RESNICK
                                               Its agent


Acknowledged:


By: _/s____________________________
Bruce Reeves, AssureTec Systems, Inc.
1 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-31220
DAVID THERIOT; ET AL

Plaintiffs BURLINGTON NORTHERN & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO; ET AL

Defendants

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MARY VILTZ; ET AL

Plaintiffs ANNA LAWSON Plaintiff - Appellant
v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO; ET AL

Defendants BURLINGTON NORTHERN & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO

Defendant - Appellee United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D May 1, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk2

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PEGGY GERAC; ET AL

Plaintiffs PEGGY GERAC; FRANCIS GREEN

Plaintiffs - Appellants
v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO; ET AL

Defendants BURLINGTON NORTHERN & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO

Defendant - Appellee

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ETHEL TAYLOR; ET AL

Plaintiffs ETHEL TAYLOR Plaintiff - Appellant
v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO; ET AL

Defendants BURLINGTON NORTHERN & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should

not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. 3 Defendant - Appellee
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana (00-CV-1097)

_________________________________________________________ Before REAVLEY, CLEMENT and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Although pro se pleadings are afforded liberal construction, see Haines v, Kerner , 404 U.S. 519, 520, 92 S. Ct. 594 (1972), even pro se litigants m ust adequately brief arguments in order to properly present them for consideration. See Yahey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). Appellants have made no showing of the jurisdiction of this court and have inadequately briefed their arguments. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. APPEAL DISMISSED.
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
The Travelers Series Trust:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements
of U.S. Government Securities Portfolio, Social Awareness Stock
Portfolio and Utilities Portfolio of The Travelers Series Trust
(the "Trust") for the year ended December 31, 1997, we considered
its internal control, including control activities for
safeguarding securities, in order to determine our auditing
procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the
financial statements and to comply with the requirements of Form
N-SAR, not to provide assurance on the internal control.

The management of the Trust is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles. Those controls include the safeguarding of
assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or
irregularities may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection
of any evaluation of internal control to future periods is
subject to the risk that it may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and
operation may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in the internal control that might be
material weaknesses under standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness
is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of
the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively
low level the risk that errors or irregularities in amounts that
would be material in relation to the financial statements being
audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by
employees in the normal course of performing their assigned
functions.  However, we noted no matters involving the internal
control and its operation, including controls for safeguarding
securities that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined
above.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management, the Board of Trustees of the Trust, and the
Securities and Exchange Commission.




February 10, 1998
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7612
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DAVID LOUIS MCPHERSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-00-81-H, CA-02-58-H) Submitted: January 16, 2003 Decided: January 24, 2003 Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Louis McPherson, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: David Louis McPherson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that McPherson has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See United States v. McPherson , Nos. CR-00-81-H; CA-02-58-H (E.D.N.C. July 19, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
CUMULATIVE IMPACTS

DRAFT PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

(PEIS) FOR SURVEYING AND MAPPING PROJECTS IN U.S. 

WATERS FOR COASTAL AND MARINE DATA ACQUISITION

Cumulative 

Impacts

Cumulative impacts on the environment result from the incremental impact of the

Proposed Action when added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future

actions; they can be individually minor, but collectively significant, and occur over a

long period of time.

Additive cumulative effects are the

sum of the effects on a resource.

Interactive cumulative effects can be

countervailing, meaning the net

adverse effect is less than the sum of

the individual effects, or synergistic,

meaning the net adverse effect is

greater than the sum of the individual

effects.

NOS surveying and

mapping activities

Past, on-going, and reasonably foreseeable

future actions within the Action Area

NOS Survey Vessels

Cumulative impact on resources

Oil and Gas Activities, Offshore California

Cumulative 

Actions in the 

Action Area

• Other Surveying and Mapping Efforts

• Offshore Oil and Natural Gas Development

• Offshore Renewable Energy Development

• Climate Change

• Commercial Shipping and Recreational Boating

• Marine Minerals Projects

• Offshore Carbon Storage Resource Assessments

• Offshore Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Terminals

• National Defense and Homeland Security Activities

• Submarine Telecommunication Cable Infrastructure

• Commercial and Recreational Fishing

• Coastal Development

The Proposed Action, when considered together with past, on-going, and reasonably foreseeable projects

in the Action Area, would not significantly contribute to cumulative impacts on any of the resource areas

analyzed.

Photo Credits: NOAA Photo Library and BSEE and BOEM oceanservice.noaa.gov/about/environmental-compliance/surveying-mapping.html
Franky JOSEPH, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 19-5292

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
Marcus T. SIMMONS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6521

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor, with whom Justice Ginsburg joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari:

I dissent for the reasons set out in *Brown v. United States* , 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 14, 202 L.Ed.2d 302 (2018) ( Sotomayor, J., dissenting).