alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4902 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4902

    To suspend temporarily the duty on Dimyristyl Peroxydicarbonate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 19, 2007

 Mr. Lampson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on Dimyristyl Peroxydicarbonate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DIMYRISTYL PEROXYDICARBONATE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902._._        Dimyristyl          Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Peroxydicarbonate                                                  31/2011
                         (CAS No. 53220-22-
                         7) (provided for
                         in subheading
                         2917.19.7050)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
10f-3 REPORT

SALOMON BROTHERS VARIABLE CAPITAL FUND
April 1, 2000 through June 30, 2000


	Trade	Purchase	% of
Issuer	Date	Selling Dealer	Amount	Price
	Issue(1)

Uticom	4/5/00	Lehman Brothers	$27,300	$13.00	0.11A
Charles River	6/23/00	Donaldson L. Jenrette	$32,000	$16.00	0.04B
Manufacturers Services	6/23/00	Donaldson L. Jenrette	$32,000
	$16.00	0.04C
Capstone Turbine	6/29/00	Goldman Sachs	$59,200	$16.00	0.10D
Mobile Telesystem	6/30/00	Deutsche Banc	$32,250	$22.00	0.03E
Netease	6/30/00	Merrill Lynch	$17,050	$16.00	0.06F



(1) Represents purchases by all affiliated funds; may not exceed
25% of the offering.

A - A total of 4,800 shares was purchased by funds in the Salomon
Brothers complex for an aggregate purchase price of $62,400.
B - A total of 4,800 shares was purchased by funds in the Salomon
Brothers complex for an aggregate purchase price of $76,800.
C - A total of 4,700 shares was purchased by funds in the Salomon
Brothers complex for an aggregate purchase price of $75,200.
D - A total of 9,200 shares was purchased by funds in the Salomon
Brothers complex for an aggregate purchase price of $147,200.
E - A total of 3,700 shares was purchased by funds in the Salomon
Brothers complex for an aggregate purchase price of $79,550.
F - A total of 2,700 shares was purchased by funds in the Salomon
Brothers complex for an aggregate purchase price of $41,850.


10f-3 REPORT

SALOMON BROTHERS VARIABLE SMALL CAP GROWTH FUND
April 1, 2000 through June 30, 2000


	Trade	Purchase	% of
Issuer	Date	Selling Dealer	Amount	Price
	Issue(1)

Charles River	6/23/00	Donaldson L. Jenrette	$32,000	$16.00	0.04A
US Unwired	5/18/00	Donaldson L. Jenrette	$271,700 $11.00	0.31B
Capstone Turbine	6/29/00	Goldman Sachs	$59,200	$16.00	0.10C



(1) Represents purchases by all affiliated funds; may not exceed
25% of the offering.

A - A total of 4,800 shares was purchased by funds in the Salomon
Brothers complex for an aggregate purchase price of $76,800.
B - A total of 25,000 shares was purchased by funds in the Salomon
Brothers complex for an aggregate purchase price of $275,000.
C - A total of 9,200 shares was purchased by funds in the Salomon
Brothers complex for an aggregate purchase price of $147,200.
David K. HOWELL, Petitioner, v. Shawn HATTON, Warden.

No. 19-7590.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
. 

opmon Bo. O-446 

ReS Are o:dn opc:rated ruehine8 

for dlrpnrlry crnltaw 

aEpkh8 mubrTlco oolnoperate6 moblaeV end 

eaempt iraa the tax lerie4 

by hrt. VOWn-M 

Ka are la reoslpt of your letter of &ixoh 9, 1939 mquertlae our oplnlo~ 66 to whether 4ola-ope~stb6 mohlner hutteiled la 

ladler’ met room aad wslch 6lrpeE8e raaltiry napklnn are us~t710e 

0cln-o exnted mohlnes* and thorsfon 4x-t troll the tax lmpoeed 

by Art T 414 004984, Rs+leed lN6tUte8, on OOrtain eoln-opcratbb 

maohlnea. 

nrtiolo To494-4 r4464 44 f0uow.c 

‘ten rcstrre, pny t~lophon~r, pay to114tr, aa4 4-e 

l tte +andln(( machiaao *hloh are cow 8ubJeot wizard ecutlon or grois r444fptr tax and m84rvlao 4oia-o .rrtrd 

m6ahlse~8* ar that t-4X-B 18 detlned, are exgnra r f e%bmpt 

rrw abe tar lsrl4d hsnln, an4 Ch. oshsr prOri4iOnr of 

tblr- 84oflaa.” 

“The term 'Ircrohaadlre or Muir oofn 

“p 

anta 

ssohIzu* as usod hare18 rho11 meen ad loo u44 errrr oohop+mted mah!ae of any kind or oharaoter, rblcb dlrpeaser 

or wade or rhloh lr uacd or operated for d~rpsn8lng or 

ronding aemhaadi8a, ooamxIltle8, confnotione or m4l4 

and wr11ob 18 opentod by or nlth 6011~8 or ntal l lug8, 

tot4a4 or oheoks. m r0umrrp 4n 4x9~4441~ uoiu444 
wlthln uld to a a l t uAd cmwaer, gu8 mmhlner, 

eaa6rrl.h uahlrum, h Kk4 m4r ~hin44, 44dtd127 

e- 0-t phowe=D& O-8 m 

X'84108, SBd Sl& Other ~i.lbO~?'d W gro di%?%h 

or rend syauk4180, oonmoditl-, l imr00tw8 

.- 

iLtiia 90471-8 i@ (b) L‘Was &I rOilOW8: 

“The tern *operator* 68 wed herein dud1 moan ana 

inoltid~ 6ny person rimi oolpanl, sswoi6tlon or aorporatltm rho exhlb8tB, &day8 or pancltr to be 4x0 

hibite& or tlleplafsd, la hls or lta plaoa of burines8 

or upcut pnd808 midor bl8 or it5 omtrol, any tooinopentad mtwhln~' In tllir St&@.. 

AS notbd above rsohiner vhlch dls ens8 “morotxtudlnan am 

aprssel~ browbt rlthln the olaem of rsaoh P uam l ubjeotd to the 

gami04 OOiU-OQOmt4d 1#0~1R@8~ 8m 4%4#?#0d rrw the b% 

%‘tLore mretiner which Ql4ptin44 merohmulee l ra srpms8ly exolb4 

frw the beflnltlon of ruob exempted moh:nol. 

Suoh ~pkinr sn 4o8aoditier rrbiah 61-4 r&4 8t every dw 

&ore. Tbnt *4x4 sr4 memhnD4lU 18 tao plain to e&St of n-t;. 

Tb4 z344biao4 rererre6 to are not l x sq t rm tb0 t4x. 

Toum t*rJy trDlJ
snap-ex102_213.htm



Exhibit 10.2

 

[*] = Certain confidential information contained in this document, marked by brackets, has been omitted because it is both (i) not material and (ii) would be competitively harmful if publicly disclosed.

 

AMENDMENT No 8

 

This amendment no. 8 (“Amendment No 8”) is entered into by Google LLC, whose principal place of business is at 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA (“Google”); and Snap, Inc. whose principal place of business is at 63 Market Street, Venice, Ca 90291, USA ("Customer”).

 

This Amendment is effective as of the date last signed by the parties below (“Amendment No 8 Effective Date”).

 

INTRODUCTION

 


	
(A)
	
Customer and Google are parties to the Google Platform License Agreement with an effective date of January 30, 2017 (as previously amended) (the “Agreement”).




 

(B)The parties wish to amend the Agreement. 

 

AGREED TERMS

 


	
 
	
1.
	
Definitions.  Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment have the meanings given to them in the Agreement.




 


	
 
	
2.
	
Amendments.  From the Amendment No 8 Effective Date, the Agreement is amended as follows: 




 


	
 
	
2.1.
	
The following is added as Section 6.d. of Exhibit A - Pricing Exhibit:




 

Enterprise Support Fees. During the Discount Periods, Customer and any of Customer’s Affiliates who have executed a Customer Affiliate Agreement will receive Enterprise Support [*].  “Enterprise Support” means the Enterprise Support services as described in the GCP Technical Support Services Guidelines located at: https://cloud.google.com/terms/tssg/. 

 


	
 
	
3.
	
General




 


	
 
	
3.1.
	
The Agreement remains in full force and effect except as modified by this Amendment. To the extent the Agreement and this Amendment conflict, this Amendment governs.




 


	
 
	
3.2.
	
The Agreement’s governing law and dispute resolution provisions also apply to this Amendment.  




 

Signed by the parties’ authorized representatives on the dates below.

 


		
	
GOOGLE
	
Customer

	
By: /s/ Philipp Schindler
	
By: /s/ Karl D’Adamo

	
Name: Philipp Schindler
	
Name: Karl D’Adamo

	
Title: Authorized Signatory
	
Title: Director of Engineering

	
Date: April 3, 2019
	
Date: April 3, 2019




 

 

1
An official website of the United States government.								Here's how you know we're official.				

##### dot gov icon**Official websites use .gov**

A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

##### https icon**Secure websites use HTTPS**

A small lock or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to a .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

National Ocean ServiceNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

              -  Home 
              -  Ocean Facts 
              -  TOPICS ****                  - Explore All Topics
                - Careers
                - Economy
                - Ecosystems
                - Geodesy
                - Hazards
                - Navigation
                - Observations
                - Ocean
                - Recreation
                - Sea Level Rise 
                - Story Maps
                - Tools 
              -  Education 
              -  News 
              -  Podcasts 
              -  Video 
              -  Images 
              -  About Us 

HomeEducationTides and Water LevelsTidal Variations - The Influence of Position and Distance

<< Back

Together, the  gravitational pull of the moon and the sun affect the Earth’s tides on  a monthly basis. When the sun, moon, and Earth are in alignment (at the  time of the new or full moon), the solar tide has an additive effect on  the lunar tide, creating extra-high high tides, and very low, low tides  — both commonly called spring tides. One week later, when the sun and  moon are at right angles to each other, the solar tide partially  cancels out the lunar tide and produces moderate tides known as neap  tides. During each lunar month, two sets of spring and two sets of neap  tides occur (Sumich, J.L., 1996).

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
An official website of the United States government.								Here's how you know we're official.				

##### dot gov icon**Official websites use .gov**

A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

##### https icon**Secure websites use HTTPS**

A small lock or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to a .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

National Ocean ServiceNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

              -  Home 
              -  Ocean Facts 
              -  TOPICS ****                  - Explore All Topics
                - Careers
                - Economy
                - Ecosystems
                - Geodesy
                - Hazards
                - Navigation
                - Observations
                - Ocean
                - Recreation
                - Sea Level Rise 
                - Story Maps
                - Tools 
              -  Education 
              -  News 
              -  Podcasts 
              -  Video 
              -  Images 
              -  About Us 

HomeEducationCoralsThe Importance of Coral Reefs

# Commercial Sponging

In the 1890s, harvesting sponges was second only to cigar-making in economic  importance in the Florida Keys. Today, commercial sponging still takes  place in these coral reefs areas, but on a much smaller scale. Large  nets of recently harvested marine sponges can be seen drying on the top  of this boat's wheelhouse. (photo: Scott Larosa)

### Corals Lessons

              - Welcome
              - What are Corals?
              - Zooxanthellae What's That?
              - How Do Stony Corals Grow?
              - How Do Coral Reefs Form?
              - Where Are Coral Reefs Found?
              - How Do Corals Reproduce?
              - Importance of Coral Reefs
              - Natural Threats to Coral Reefs
              - Anthropogenic Threats to Corals
              - Coral Diseases
              - Protecting Coral Reefs
              - References
              - Roadmap to Resources 
              - Subject Review (PDF)

----

National Science Teaching Association (NSTA)

###### **Search** Education

###### Get **Social**

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

ARTURO LABOY

,

Defendant Below

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below

Appellee. §

§ No. 473, 2015

§

§

§

§ Court Below

— Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware,

§ in and for New Castle County

§ Cr. ID Cr. ID 93003649DI

§

§

Submitted: October 8, 2015

Decided: December 4 , 2015

Before HOLLAND

, VALIHURA , and VAUGHN , Justices

O R D E R

This 4 th day of December 2015

, after careful consideration of the appellant’s

opening brief , the State’s motion to affirm, and the record on appeal, we affirm the

judgment below on the basis of the Superior Court = s well

- reasoned decision dated

August 4, 2015 . The Superior Court did not err in denying the appellant’s motion

for modification or correction of sentence under both Superior Court Criminal Rule

35(a) and 35(b) because the appellant’s sentence is not illegal and his motion was

both untimely and repetitive.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior

Court is AFF IRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice
# L_2016108EN.01003201.xml

| 23.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 108/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 108/32

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU, Euratom) 2016/640

of 21 April 2016

appointing five members of the Court of Auditors

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 286(2) thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to the proposals by the Czech Republic, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic,

Having regard to the opinions of the European Parliament (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | The terms of office of Mr Jan KINŠT, Mr Igors LUDBORŽS, Mr Augustyn KUBIK, Mr Milan Martin CVIKL and Mr Ladislav BALKO are due to expire on 6 May 2016. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The terms of office of Mr Jan KINŠT, Mr Igors LUDBORŽS, Mr Augustyn KUBIK, Mr Milan Martin CVIKL and Mr Ladislav BALKO are due to expire on 6 May 2016.

| (2) | New appointments should therefore be made, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

New appointments should therefore be made,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed members of the Court of Auditors for the period from 7 May 2016 to 6 May 2022:

| — | Mr Jan GREGOR, |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Jan GREGOR,

| — | Mr Mihails KOZLOVS, |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Mihails KOZLOVS,

| — | Mr Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI, |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI,

| — | Mr Samo JEREB, |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Samo JEREB,

| — | Mr Ladislav BALKO. |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Ladislav BALKO.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 21 April 2016.

For the Council

The President

G.A. VAN DER STEUR

---

(1)  Opinions of 13 April 2016 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

1

---
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Effective Profitable Software, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gary Moore, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| 1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 , fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| 2. | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 , fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Effective Profitable Software, Inc. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Dated: August 18, 2006

 

*/s/ Gary Moore*

Gary Moore

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Riviera Tool Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ending August 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth
K. Rieth, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Dated:   January 14, 2003         By: /s/ Kenneth K. Rieth
                                      ---------------------
                                  Kenneth K. Rieth
                                  Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K/A pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Premier Alliance Group, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June
30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), Mark S. Elliott, Acting Chief Executive and Financial
Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Premier Alliance Group, Inc., and will be retained by Premier
Alliance Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.


/s/ Mark S. Elliott
--------------------
Mark S. Elliott
Acting Chief Executive and Financial Officer
August 15, 2007
Sara E. PARKER v. N.C. HUMAN RELATIONS FAIR HOUSING COMMISSION.

No. 374P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2004.

Sara E. Parker, Pro Se.

Stacey A. Phipps, Assistant Attorney General for Housing Commission.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 23rd day of July 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2004."
EXHIBIT
32







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Premier Alliance Group, Inc., a Nevada
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Mark S. Elliott, Acting Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the
Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Premier Alliance Group, Inc., and will be retained by Premier Alliance Group,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.








/s/ Mark S. Elliott


Mark S.
Elliott


Acting
Chief Executive and Financial
Officer


August
14,
2009