T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). N C / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. J OS E GU AD AL UP E E S T R AD ADE L GA DO , D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 09- 50350 D. C . No . 3 : 0 8 - C R - 0 3 7 4 7 - J AH ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia J ohn A . H ous t on, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A pr i l5, 2010 ** B efo re: R Y M E R , M cK E O W N , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. Jose G uadal up e E stra da-D el gado appeal s f rom the 15 -m on th sent ence i m po se d fol l ow i ng hi s gui l ty- pl eaconv i ct i on for m aki ng and p osse ss i ng fa l se entry 

# FI LED APR14 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSN C/ Res ea r ch 09- 50350 2 d o c u m e n ts , in v io la tio n o f 1 8 U .S .C . § 1 5 4 6 ( a ) . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n p u r s u an t to 2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n dw e a f f i rm. E s tr a da - D e l ga do c ont e nds tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourts e nt e nc e d hi m ba s e d on c l e a r l ye rr one ous f

a c tua l f i ndi ngs tha t : ( 1) the of

f e ns e i nvol ve d “ s ol i c i t a t i on; ” and (2) hi s c ri m i nal hi st ory i ncl ud ed an offense i nv ol vi ng the sa l e of drugs. H e f urther c o n te n d s th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s r e lian c e up o n th e la tte rv io la te s h is S ix th A m e n d m e n t an dD u e P r o c e s s r ig h ts . T h e r e c o r dr e f le c ts th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt d id n o t r e lyup o n c le a r lye rr o n e o u s f a c ts . A c c o r d in g ly , th e s e c o n te n tio n s f a il. E s tr a d a - D e lg a d o a ls o c o n te n d s th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s c o n s id e r a tio n o f h is c r i m i na l hi s t orya ts e nt e nc i ng vi ol a t e s the S i xth A m e ndm e nt ’ s D oubl e J e opa r dy C lau s e . T h is c o n te n tio n f a ils b e c au s e , e v e n th o u g h E s tr a d a - D e lg a d o ’s s e n te n c e is a f f e c te db yh is c r im in a l h is to ry , h e is o n lyb e in g p u n is h e df o ro n e c r im e . See U ni te d States v . W

r i ght , 89 1 F . 2d 20 9, 21 2 (9th C i r. 19 89 ). F in a lly , E s tr a d a - D e lg a d o c o n te n d s th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt e rr o n e o u s ly bel i eved thatextra ordi naryci rc um st ance s w er e r equi re d i n o rderfor i tt o v ary b e lo w th e G u id e lin e s r a n g e , a n dth a t th e s e n te n c e is s ub s tan tiv e lyu n r e a s o n ab le . T he r e c or d r e f

l e c t s tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l yc ons i de r e d the G ui de l i ne s r ange a s aba s e l i ne , a nd the n “ t a i l or [ e d] as e nt e nc e t o the i ndi vi dua l i z e d of f e ns e a nd of f e nde rc ha r a c t e r i s t i c s of

[ E s tr a da - D e l ga do’ s ] c a s e i n c ons i de r a t i on of theN C/ Res ea r ch 09- 50350 3 § 3 55 3(a) fa ct ors. ” See U n ite d Sta tes v . Ca r ty , 520 F . 3d 984, 994 ( 9th C i r . 2008) (e n b anc) . M oreover, i n l i gh tof al l of the ci rc um st ance s i n the ca se , the se nt ence im p o s e dis s ub s tan tiv e lyr e a s o n ab le . Se e id . a t995- 96. AF F I RME D.