alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 16-10269

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket Number 1:13-cr-20577-MGC-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

ROBERT BENEBY, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

________________________

(January 6, 2017)

Before WILSON, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Reginald Moss, Jr., appointed counsel for Robert Beneby in this direct 

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the 

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Our independent review of the entire record, including Beneby’s response to 

Case: 16-10269 Date Filed: 01/06/2017 Page: 1 of 2 
2

counsel’s motion, reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the 

appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no 

arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and 

Beneby’s convictions and total sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case: 16-10269 Date Filed: 01/06/2017 Page: 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 121 (Friday, June 24, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 37893]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13455]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, First-Class 
Package Service, and Parcel Select Service Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: June 24, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
June 15, 2022, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, First-Class 
Package Service, and Parcel Select Service Contract 13 to Competitive 
Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. 
MC2022-70, CP2022-76.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2022-13455 Filed 6-23-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EXHIBIT
      32.2





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION
      1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 (the
“Report”) by China Fire & Security Group, Inc. (the “Registrant”), I, Brian
      Lin, hereby certify that:





1.
      To the
      best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      To the
      best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of
      the Registrant.




Dated:
                November 13, 2007
            By:
            /s/
                Brian LinName:Brian
                LinTitle:  
                Principal Accounting Officer
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4886 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain DVD readers and 

writers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2007 

Mr. FILNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain DVD 

readers and writers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN DVD READERS AND WRITERS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.36 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 certain DVD readers and writers) is amended by striking 

7 the date in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/ 

8 31/2011’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4886 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. (the "Company") for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David T. Hamamoto, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



Date: August 8, 2008

By:

/s/DAVID T. HAMAMOTODavid T. Hamamoto Chief Executive Officer


This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1274 

KA 14-00720 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, LINDLEY, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KAWAUN VAUGHN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (EVAN B. HANNAY OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (JAMES P. MAXWELL

OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Joseph E.

Fahey, J.), rendered November 10, 2009. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of manslaughter in the first

degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his

plea of guilty of manslaughter in the first degree (Penal Law § 125.20

[1]), defendant contends that the waiver of the right to appeal is not

valid and challenges the severity of the sentence. Although “[w]e

agree with defendant that the waiver of the right to appeal is invalid

because the minimal inquiry made by County Court was insufficient to

establish that the court engage[d] the defendant in an adequate

colloquy to ensure that the waiver of the right to appeal was a

knowing and voluntary choice” (People v Jones, 107 AD3d 1589, 1589, lv

denied 21 NY3d 1075 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see People v

Hassett, 119 AD3d 1443, 1443-1444, lv denied 24 NY3d 961; People v

Mobley, 118 AD3d 1336, 1336-1337, lv denied 24 NY3d 1121), we

nevertheless reject defendant’s challenge to the severity of the

sentence. 

Entered: December 23, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Malcom MCCLENON, Petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 19-6070

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Independent Auditors' Consent




To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Smith Barney Municipal Money Market Fund, Inc.:
We consent to the incorporation by reference, in this
Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information, of
our report dated May 8, 2001, on the statement of
assets and liabilities for the Smith Barney Municipal
Money Market Fund Inc. as of March 31, 2001, and the
related statement of operations for the year then
ended, the statements of changes in net assets for
each of the years in the two-year period then ended,
and the financial highlights for each of the years in
the five-year period then ended. These financial
statements and financial highlights and our report
thereon are included in the Annual Report of the Fund
as filed on Form N-30D.
We also consent to the references to our firm under
the headings' Financial Highlights' in the Prospectus
and Auditors' in the Statement of Additional
Information.



K
PMG
LLP
New York, New York
July 25, 2001


Page
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1527 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the deduction 

allowed for student loan interest. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 12, 2013 

Mr. RANGEL (for himself, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. POLIS, 

Mr. VARGAS, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. CLARKE, Mr. KIND, 

Ms. BORDALLO, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. CONYERS, and Ms. WILSON of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the deduction allowed for student loan interest. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Student Loan Interest 

5 Deduction Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN DEDUCTION FOR STUDENT LOAN IN7 TEREST. 

8 (a) INCREASE IN DOLLAR LIMITATION AND REPEAL

9 OF LIMITATION BASED ON INCOME.—Subsection (b) of 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1527 IH

1 section 221 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

2 amended to read as follows: 

3 ‘‘(b) MAXIMUM DEDUCTION.—The deduction allowed 

4 by subsection (a) for the taxable year shall not exceed 

5 $5,000 ($10,000 in the case of a joint return).’’. 

6 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 221 of 

7 such Code is amended by striking subsections (e) and (f) 

8 (relating to special rules and inflation adjustments, re9 spectively) and inserting the following new subsection: 

10 ‘‘(e) DENIAL OF DOUBLE BENEFIT.—No deduction 

11 shall be allowed under this section for any amount for 

12 which a deduction is allowable under any other provision 

13 of this chapter.’’. 

14 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

16 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             119
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,072
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,786
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,906
<PP&E>                                           6,351
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,469
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,098
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,150
<BONDS>                                         20,529
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            2,928
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,511)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,098
<SALES>                                         29,601
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,601
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,981
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,760
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,596
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,647)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (561)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,086)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,086)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
HomeNews

# August/September 2017: Hurricane Harvey

## National Geodetic Survey damage assessment imagery available online.

From August 27-September 4, the National Geodetic Survey (NGS) collected damage assessment imagery in the aftermath of Hurricane Harvey. The aerial imagery was collected in specific areas identified by FEMA and the National Weather Service. You can access all of the images collected online. 

Select the round icon with directional arrows using your mouse (or your finger) and slide back and forth to view a "before and after" comparison. "Before" images are provided by Mapbox, Digital Globe, and OpenStreetMap; "After" images were captured by NOAA's National Geodetic Survey in the aftermath of Hurricane Harvey. 

Near Otey, Texas | Download

 Houston, Texas | Download

Near Lynchburg, Texas | Download

Near Kingwood, Texas | Download

Near Aransas Pass, Texas | Download

A team of NOAA aviators captured the images using specialized remote-sensing cameras aboard NOAA's King Air aircraft flying above the area at an altitude between **500 - 1,500 meters**. 

NOAA's aerial imagery aids safe navigation and captures damage to coastal areas caused by a storm. Aerial imagery is a crucial tool to determine the extent of the damage inflicted by flooding, and to compare baseline coastal areas to assess the damage to major ports and waterways, coastlines, critical infrastructure, and coastal communities. This imagery provides a cost-effective way to better understand the damage sustained to both property and the environment. 

National Geodetic Survey Imagery: Hurricane Harvey

FEMA: Hurricane Harvey Resources

Texas coast 2016 LIDAR data from NOAA's Office for Coastal Management

###### **Search** Our Posts

###### Get **Social**

###### More **Information**

          - National Geodetic Survey
          - NOAA Office of Marine and Aviation Operations
          - NOS Aerial Photography and Shoreline Mapping

Did you know?

NOAA's National Geodetic Survey is the U.S. Government source for precise latitude, longitude, and elevation measurements. The NOAA fleet of ships and aircraft is operated, managed, and maintained by the NOAA Office of Marine and Aviation Operations, which includes commissioned officers of the NOAA Corps and civilian wage mariners.

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
**Exhibit 31.1**

** **

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Caroline Rechia, the President, Chief ExecutiveOfficer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of Northridge Ventures Inc., certify that:

 

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly reporton Form 10-Q of Northridge Ventures Inc.;

 

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. 	I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:

 

a)	designed such disclosure controlsand procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)	evaluated the effectiveness ofthe registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterlyreport (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

c)	presented in this quarterly reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5. 	I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

a)	all significant deficiencies inthe design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;and

 

b)	any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls.

 

6. 	I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there weresignificant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to thedate of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

April 12, 2012

 

 

 

By /s/ Caroline Rechia

Caroline Rechia

President, Chief Executive Officer,

Chief Financial Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

     In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of National Beef Packing Company, LLC (the Company)on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended February 23, 2008 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John R.Miller, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

     (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

     (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

|   |   |                                    |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
| By:    |   | /s/ John R. Miller                      |
|   |   |                                    |
|   |   | John R. Miller*Chief Executive Officer* |

Date: April4, 2008
Exhibit 3.4


Effective  September 1, 2005 the Bylaws of the Corporation  have been amended by
deleting  Section  2 of  Article  II and  replacing  it with the  following  new
section:


                  "Section 2. Annual meetings of stockholders,  shall be held at
         such  date and time as shall  be  designated  from  time to time by the
         Board of Directors  and stated in the notice of the  meeting,  at which
         they shall elect  directors  and  transact  such other  business as may
         properly be brought  before the meeting.  Written  notice of the annual
         meeting stating the place,  date and hour of the meeting shall be given
         to each stockholder entitled to vote at such meeting not fewer than ten
         (10) nor more than sixty (60) days before the date of the meeting."
Steve COOLEY, et al., Petitioners v. NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION

No. 19-525

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
I, Carl E. Vogel, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofCCO Holdings, LLC and CCO Holdings Capital Corp.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrants as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4. The registrants’ other certifying officer(s) and Iare responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrants and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls andprocedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating tothe registrants, including theirconsolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others withinthose entities, particularlyduring the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  (b) [Reserved];  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness ofthe registrants’ disclosurecontrols and procedures andpresented in this report ourconclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered bythis report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrants’internal control over financialreporting that occurred duringthe registrants’ most recentfiscal quarter (the registrants’fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or isreasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrants’ internalcontrol over financial reporting;and
5. The registrants’ other certifying officer(s) and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrants’ auditors and the audit committee of theregistrants’ board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the designor operation of internal controlover financial reporting whichare reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrants’ability to record, process,summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involvesmanagement or other employees whohave a significant role in theregistrants’ internal controlover financial reporting.
Date: November 12, 2004 /s/ Carl E. VogelCarl E. VogelChief Executive Officer