alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT31.1**

#### **CERTIFICATIONS**

I,Dana Persson, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form10-Q of Golden Oval Eggs, LLC;

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

(a)           Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)           Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)           Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

(a)           Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
| Date:  |   July  16, 2007             |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                   |   |
|   |                                   |   |
|   | /s/ Dana Persson                       |   |
|   | Dana Persson                           |
|   | President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 10, 2017

t0307 

# Order

Clerk March 10, 2017

154666

MEMBERSELECT INSURANCE COMPANY an d

AUTO CLUB GROUP INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

v SC: 154666

COA: 332564

Wayne CC: 15

- 005144

- CZ

STEVE LEGAL, as Next Friend of AUGUST

LEGAL, a minor,

Defendant

- Appellant,

and

TERRI LEGAL and PAUL GREEN,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the stipulation signed by counsel for the parties agreeing to

the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the application for

leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.

B ERNSTEIN , J., did not participate due to his prior relationship with the Sam

Bernstein Law Firm.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4909 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Didecanoyl Peroxide. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2007 

Mr. LAMPSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Didecanoyl Peroxide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DIDECANOYL PEROXIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.l.l Didecanoyl Peroxide (CAS 

No. 762–12–9) (provided for 

in subheading 2917.19.70) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4909 IH

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
STATE v. Benny STANLEY.

No. 592A03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 24, 2004.

Nora Henry Hargrove, Wilmington, for Stanley.

Rex Gore, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th day of November 2003 by the Attorney General to Dismiss the Appeal:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 24th day of June 2004."
STATE of North Carolina v. Jerome Michael STOKES.

No. 174P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 24, 2004.

Jerome Michael Stokes, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Thomas H. Lock, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 6th day of April 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Lee County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."
IN RE F.M.L.W.

No. COA04-18.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 7, 2004.

Certification Date December 28, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 8.1**

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES**

| **Company**                          | **Country of incorporation** | **% Held** |
|--------------------------------------|------------------------------|------------|
| SkyePharma Canada      Holding Inc.* | Canada                       | 100%       |
| SkyePharma Canada      Inc.          | Canada                       | 100%       |
| SkyePharma Production      SAS*      | France                       | 100%       |
| Krypton Limited                      | Gibraltar                    | 100%       |
| SkyePharma Holding      AG*          | Switzerland                  | 100%       |
| Jago Holding      AG                 | Switzerland                  | 100%       |
| SkyePharma AG                        | Switzerland                  | 100%       |
| Jago Research      AG                | Switzerland                  | 100%       |
| Jagotec AG                           | Switzerland                  | 100%       |
| SkyePharma Holding      Inc.*        | U.S.                         | 100%       |
| SkyePharma US      Inc.              | U.S.                         | 100%       |
| SkyePharma Inc.                      | U.S.                         | 100%       |
| SkyePharma AB*                       | Sweden                       | 100%       |
|                                      |                              |            |

*     Directly  held by SkyePharma PLC.
# L_2016124EN.01000101.xml

| 13.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 124/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 124/1

---

STATEMENT OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COMMISSION ON THE OCCASION OF THE ADOPTION OF THE INTERINSTITUTIONAL AGREEMENT ON BETTER LAW-MAKING OF 13 APRIL 2016

The European Parliament and the Commission consider that the Agreement (1) reflects the balance between, and respective competences of, the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission as set out in the Treaties.

1

It is without prejudice to the Framework Agreement of 20 October 2010 on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission (2).

2

---

(1)  
  OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 304, 20.11.2010, p. 47.

2

---
Roger Carl BERRY v. STATE of North Carolina.

No. 537P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 2, 2004.

Roger Carl Berry, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Edward W. Grannis, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 12th day of October 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of December 2004."
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 8, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40124

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MANUEL GONZALEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:05-CR-779-ALL

--------------------

Before KING, GARWOOD, and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Manuel Gonzalez

raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v.

United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal

offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1426 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1426

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to disallow the deduction 
for income attributable to domestic production activities with respect 
      to oil and gas activities of major integrated oil companies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 9, 2013

    Mr. Bishop of New York introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to disallow the deduction 
for income attributable to domestic production activities with respect 
      to oil and gas activities of major integrated oil companies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Big Oil Welfare Repeal Act of 
2013''.

SEC. 2. DEDUCTION FOR INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO DOMESTIC PRODUCTION 
              ACTIVITIES NOT ALLOWED WITH RESPECT TO OIL AND GAS 
              ACTIVITIES OF MAJOR INTEGRATED OIL COMPANIES.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (A) of section 199(d)(9) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting ``(9 percent in 
the case of any major integrated oil company (as defined in section 
167(h)(5)(B)))'' after ``3 percent''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

```

----

Updated April 4, 2014
Independent Auditors Report


To the Board of Trustees and Shareholders of
Smith Barney Investment Series:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements
of the Smith Barney International Aggressive Growth Fund of Smith
Barney Investment Series (Fund) for the year ended October 31,
2002, we considered its internal control, including control
activities for safeguarding securities, in order to determine our
auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on
the financial statements and to comply with the requirements of
Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Those controls include the safeguarding of assets against
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, error or
fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any
evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to
the risk that it may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in internal control that might be material
weaknesses under standards established by the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness is a
condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the
internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low
level the risk that errors or fraud in amounts that would be
material in relation to the financial statements being audited
may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees
in the normal course of performing their assigned functions.
However, we noted no matters involving internal control and its
operation, including controls for safeguarding securities that we
consider to be material weaknesses as defined above as of October
31, 2002.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management and the Board of Trustees of the Fund and the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not intended to be and
should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.


                                                  KPMG LLP

New York, New York
December 11, 2002
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4908 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Lauroyl Peroxide. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2007 

Mr. LAMPSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Lauroyl Peroxide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LAUROYL PEROXIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.l.l Lauroyl Peroxide (CAS No. 

105–74–8) (provided for in 

subheading 2915.90.10) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4908 IH

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-30942

Conference Calendar

__________________

JEFFERY FUSSELL,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RICHARD L. STALDER, Secretary;

ET AL.,

 Defendants-Appellees.

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 94-CV-975 B

----------------------

February 29, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Jeffery Fussell has filed a motion to proceed in forma

pauperis (IFP) on appeal. He appeals from the trial court's

denial of his motion for the appointment of counsel. 

Fussell has not demonstrated that this case is so

exceptional as to require the appointment of counsel. There is,

therefore, no abuse of discretion by the district court in not

appointing counsel.

Fussell has not presented a nonfrivolous issue. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that his motion for leave to proceed on appeal IFP
No. 95-30942

-2-

is DENIED. Because his appeal is frivolous, the appeal is

DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
**
**Exhibit 31**

**Certifications**

I,Richard Simpson, certify that: 

1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Kand all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2018-C5 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2.    Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.    Based on my knowledge, all of thedistribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4.    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of RegulationAB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and 

5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their relatedattestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described insuch reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above,I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association; KeyBank National Association; Pentalpha Surveillance LLC; U.S. Bank NationalAssociation; AEGON USA Realty Advisors, LLC; Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; CWCapital Asset Management LLC; CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc.; and National Tax Search, LLC. 

Date: March 29, 2019 

/s/ RichardSimpson                         

Richard Simpson 

President, Citigroup Commercial MortgageSecurities Inc. 

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) 

 
CGCMT 2018-C5Certifications (2018) 

**
### NUMBER 13

- 14

- 00 022

- CR



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

JEREMIAH BRIGHAM YOU NG

, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE.

On a ppeal from the 2nd 25 th District Court

of Lavaca County, Texas.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza , and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Jeremiah Brigham Young , attempts to appeal his conviction for sexual

assault . The trial court has certified that this “ is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant

has NO right of appeal, ” and “ the defendant has waived the right of appeal. ” See T EX

.

R. A PP

. P . 25.2(a)(2).2

On January 14, 2014 , this Court notified appellant ’ s counsel of the trial court ’ s

certification and o rdered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether

appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel ’ s findings

as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the

exis tence of any amended certification.

On February 14, 2014 , counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel ’ s

response does not establish that the certification currently on file with this Court is

incorrect or that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed

if the trial court ’ s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d); see T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordin gly, this appeal is

DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed the

2 7th day of F ebruary, 2014.
U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
				Here's how you know we're official. **Official websites use .gov** A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure websites use HTTPS** A small lock or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to a .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Toggle navigation Toggle search National Ocean Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
 Search
					Search National Ocean Service


Home
				Ocean Facts

				Topics
					Explore All Topics 
                        Arctic 
                        Careers 
                        Economy 
                        Ecosystems 
                        Geodesy 
                        Hazards 
                        Navigation 
                        Observations 
                        Ocean 
                        Recreation 
                         Sea Level Rise 
                        Story Maps 
                        Tools
                
                			Education

				
				News
				Podcasts
				Video
				Images
				About Us


1. Home
2. Education

Education Discover our resources and programs for educators, students, and anyone who wants to learn more about our ocean and coasts!


**Get the latest education opportunities and resources from Ocean Service Education in your inbox twice a month with our newsletter, *The Watch*. Sign up today!** ×
  For Educators
 For Students
  For Kids


Feedback Provide Feedback
							Contact Us
							Report an error
 Social Instagram Logo/a>


*Science. Service.Stewardship.*
 About NOS About Us
							NOS Program Offices
							Media Inquiries
							Website Acknowledgements
                            Site Index
							Disclaimer
 More Resources Freedom of Information Act
							Accessibility
							Information Quality
							Privacy Policy
							NOS For Employees
							USA.gov
 Department of Commerce
									National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
									National Ocean Service