alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00541-CV

Franklin Jones

v.

Trina L. Velasquez

On Appeal from the

343rd District Court of Bee County, Texas

Trial Cause No. B-12-1304-CV-C

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The Court 

orders the appeal DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION in accordance with its 

opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

November 20, 2014
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 20, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-30399 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ANTOINE THOMPSON, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:03-CR-70-ALL-K

-------------------- Before JONES, BARKSDALE and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Antoine Thompson appeals the sentence imposed following his plea of guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm. The sentence was increased for Thompson’s felonious possession of crack cocaine in connection with the firearm offense. See U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(5) (Nov. 2002). The record plainly establishes that Thompson agreed with the Government’s “Factual Basis” which stated that the Government “would prove” possession of both the firearm and the drugs.No. 04-30399 -2- Further, the PSR contained sufficient indicia of reliability to establish drug possession, and Thompson offered nothing to show that the PSR was “materially untrue, inaccurate or unreliable.”
See United States v. Ayala , 47 F.3d 688, 690 (5th Cir. 1995). Thompson also contends that the increased sentence was unconstitutional under Blakely v. Washington , 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004). He concedes that this challenge is foreclosed by United States v. Pineiro , 377 F.3d 464 (5th Cir. 2004), and he raises the issue only to preserve it for possible Supreme Court review. Blakely would afford Thompson no relief in any event because Thompson admitted the drug possession when he agreed with the factual basis recited in open court

. See Blakely , 124 S. Ct. at 2537 (admission by defendant supports sentence increase). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4762 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on self contained, carafe-less 

automatic drip coffeemaker with electronic clock. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 17, 2007 

Mr. SCOTT of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on self contained, carafe-less automatic drip coffeemaker with electronic clock. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SELF CONTAINED, CARAFE-LESS AUTOMATIC 

4 DRIP COFFEEMAKER WITH ELECTRONIC 

5 CLOCK. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.47 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended 

8 by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 4762 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
Jose Javier Banegas GOMEZ, Petitioner, v. William P. BARR, Attorney General.

No. 19-510

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Jay D. Nielsen, certify that: 

     1. I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Beef Packing Company,LLC; 

     2. Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

     3. Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

     4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

     a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

     b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and 

     c)disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

     5. The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions): 

     a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

     b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting. 

|   |   |                                    |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
| By:    |   | /s/ Jay D. Nielsen                      |
|   |   |                                    |
|   |   | Jay D. Nielsen*Chief Financial Officer* |

Date: April4, 2008
Ray Richard PERRY v. STATE of North Carolina.

No. 643P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 3, 2005.

Ray Richard Perry, Pro Se.

Christopher W. Brooks, Assistant Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 28th day of December 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of March 2005."
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1520 

To require the Secretary of Defense to allow civilian employees of the Department of Defense to delay furloughs until returning from a deployment 

in support of accounting and recovery efforts by the Joint POW/MIA 

Accounting Command. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 12, 2013 

Mr. LYNCH (for himself, Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. HIGGINS, Mr. 

DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois, and Mr. QUIGLEY) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Defense to allow civilian employees of the Department of Defense to delay furloughs 

until returning from a deployment in support of accounting and recovery efforts by the Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘POW/MIA Accounting 

5 and Recovery Support Act of 2013’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1520 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCEPTION TO CIVILIAN FURLOUGH REQUIRE2 MENTS FOR DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EM3 PLOYEES DEPLOYED IN SUPPORT OF JOINT 

4 POW/MIA ACCOUNTING COMMAND ACCOUNT5 ING AND RECOVERY EFFORTS. 

6 The Secretary of Defense shall require that, with re7 spect to a civilian employee of the Department of Defense 

8 who is required to take a furlough that would otherwise 

9 occur during the deployment of that employee in support 

10 of accounting and recovery efforts by the Joint POW/MIA 

11 Accounting Command, the employee may take the fur12 lough after returning from the deployment. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 12



MILLENNIUM CHEMICALS INC.

STATEMENT SETTING FORTH DETAIL FOR COMPUTATION OF

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES



(Millions of dollars)



|                                                |  |                         |     |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |   |  |      |      |   |  |   |     
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | --- | - | ---- | - | ---- | ---- |  | - | ---- | - |  | ---- | ---- | - |  | - | ----
|                                                |  | Year Ended December 31,
|                                                |  | 2004                    |     |   | 2003 |   |      | 2002 |  |   | 2001 |   |  | 2000
|Income (loss) before income taxes               |  | $                       | (31 | ) |      | $ | (186 | )    |  | $ | (344 | ) |  |      | $(56 | ) |  |   | $111
|Fixed charges:                                  |  |                         |     |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |   |  |      |      |   |  |   |     
|Interest expense, gross                         |  |                         | 106 |   |      |   | 98   |      |  |   | 90   |   |  |      | 85   |   |  |   | 80  
|Portion of rentals representative of interest   |  |                         | 8   |   |      |   | 7    |      |  |   | 7    |   |  |      | 6    |   |  |   | 53  
|                                                |  |                         |     |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |   |  |      |      |   |  |   |     
|Total fixed charges                             |  |                         | 114 |   |      |   | 105  |      |  |   | 97   |   |  |      | 91   |   |  |   | 133 
|                                                |  |                         |     |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |   |  |      |      |   |  |   |     
|Earnings (losses)                               |  | $                       | 83  |   |      | $ | (81  | )    |  | $ | (247 | ) |  | $    | (35  | ) |  | $ | 244 
|Ratio of earnings (losses) to fixed charges (a) |  |                         | 0.7 |   |      |   |     |      |  |   |     |   |  |      |     |   |  |   | 1.8 
|                                                |  |                         |     |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |   |  |      |      |   |  |   |     



|(a) | In 2004, 2003, 2002 and 2001, earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $31 million, $186 million, $344 million and $126 million, respectively.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
nxst-ex103_497.htm



 

Exhibit 10.3

AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR SALE OF COMMERCIAL TIME

 

This Amendment dated as of May 31, 2019 by and between Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc., as successor-in-interest to Nexstar Broadcasting of Wichita Falls, L.P. (“Nexstar”), and Mission Broadcasting, Inc., as successor-in-interest to Mission Broadcasting of Wichita Falls, Inc. (“Mission”) is made to that certain Agreement for Sale of Commercial Time dated June 1, 1999, as amended and extended (the “Agreement”).

 

WHEREAS, the Agreement expires by its terms on May 31, 2019; and

 

WHEREAS, Nexstar and Mission desire to extend the Agreement for two additional terms.

 

NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the foregoing, Nexstar and Mission hereby amend the Agreement as follows:

 


	
 
	
1.
	
Paragraph 1 of the Agreement (Term of the Agreement) is hereby amended to provide that upon the expiration of the current term, the term of this Agreement will be extended for an additional eight (8) year term (the “Renewal Term”); and that upon expiration of the Renewal Term, unless otherwise terminated by either Party, the term of the Agreement will be extended automatically for an additional eight (8) year term.




 


	
 
	
2.
	
As so amended, all sections and provisions of the Agreement are hereby ratified in full.




 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Shared Services Agreement as of the date first written above.


	
 
	
MISSION BROADCASTING, INC.

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
By:
	
/s/ Dennis Thatcher

	
 
	
Name:
	
Dennis Thatcher

	
 
	
Title:
	
 President

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
NEXSTAR BROADCASTING, INC.

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
By:
	
/s/ Thomas R. Carter

	
 
	
Name:
	
 Thomas R. Carter

	
 
	
Title:
	
 EVP and Chief Financial Officer
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4907 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Dicetyl Peroxydicarbonate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2007 

Mr. LAMPSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Dicetyl 

Peroxydicarbonate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DICETYL PEROXYDICARBONATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.l.l Dicetyl Peroxydicarbonate 

(CAS No. 26332–14–5) 

(provided for in subheading 

2917.19.70) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4907 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
**Exhibit 12.1**

 

**Hospira, Inc.**

 

**Computationof Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges**

 

**(Unaudited)**

 

***(dollars in millions except ratios)***

*** ***

| ** **                                                     | ** ** | **Three Months Ended March 31, 2008** | ** ** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------------------|------------|
| Income from Continuing  Operations Before Taxes                |       | $                                          | 84.4       |   |
| Add:                                                           |       |                                       |       |
| One-third of rents                                             |       | 1.1                                        |       |
| Interest on long-term and  short-term debt                     |       | 31.4                                       |       |
| Interest capitalized, net  of amortization                     |       | 0.9                                        |       |
|                                                           |       |                                       |       |
| Earnings from Continuing Operations                            |       | $                                          | 117.8      |   |
|                                                           |       |                                       |       |
| Fixed charges:                                                 |       |                                       |       |
| One-third of rents                                             |       | $                                          | 1.1        |   |
| Interest on long-term and  short-term debt                     |       | 31.4                                       |       |
| Interest capitalized                                           |       | 2.1                                        |       |
|                                                           |       |                                       |       |
| Fixed Charges from Continuing Operations                       |       | $                                          | 34.6       |   |
|                                                           |       |                                       |       |
| Ratio of Earnings to Fixed  Charges from Continuing Operations |       | 3.4                                        |       |

 

For purposes of computingthis ratio, “earnings” consist of income from continuing operations beforetaxes, one-third of rents (deemed by Hospira to be representative of theinterest factor inherent in rents), interest expense and interest capitalized,net of amortization.  “Fixed charges”consist of one-third of rents, interest expense and interest capitalized.

 

----
In the Matter of the WILL OF SALLIE SCHENCK MASON, Deceased appealed by Lucinda Lewis Mason.

No. 105P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 6, 2005.

Malcolm B. McSpadden, for Lucinda Lewis Mason.

Jeffery Davis, for Robert Mason, et al.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd day of February 2005 by Caveator (Lucinda Lewis Mason) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of April 2005."
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.4





July 31, 2019
General Electric Company
33-41 Farnsworth Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02210
Attention:    Christoph Pereira
Telephone:    (617) 443-2952
Attention:     Mark Landis
Telephone:     (617) 443-2909
Attention:     Brian Sandstrom 
Telephone:    (617) 443-2902
Email:        christoph.pereira@ge.com
mark.landis@ge.com
brian.sandstrom@ge.com 

Re:  Effective Date of the Amended and Restated Intellectual Property Cross License Agreement
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We are writing to confirm our understanding and agreement regarding the effective date of the Amended and Restated Intellectual Property Cross License Agreement, by and between General Electric Company and Baker Hughes, a GE company, LLC, dated as of November 13, 2018 (as amended, modified or supplemented from time to time in accordance with its terms (including by that certain Side Letter, by and between the parties hereto, dated as of November 13, 2018, relating to certain patents and dockets), the “A&R IPXL”).
		
	1.
	Effective Date of the A&R IPXL.  The definition of the term “Effective Date” in Section 1.01 of the A&R IPXL is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


(z)    “Effective Date” means immediately prior to the Trigger Date (as defined in the Stockholders Agreement).  For the avoidance of doubt, unless and until the Trigger Date occurs, and except as expressly agreed by the Parties in a separate written document signed by both Parties, (i) neither Party will have, nor be deemed to have had, any obligations under the terms of this Agreement and (ii) the Original Intellectual Property Cross License Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
		
	2.
	This Letter Agreement is Effective as of the Date Hereof.  This letter agreement, including the amendment set forth in Paragraph 1 above, is immediately effective as of the date hereof.


		
	3.
	Relationship to the A&R IPXL.  This letter agreement is supplemental to the A&R IPXL and incorporates the terms of Sections 6.05-6.14 thereof by reference (which terms shall be treated as if they are currently in effect for the purposes of this letter agreement); provided, however, to the extent of any conflict between this letter agreement and the A&R IPXL, this letter agreement shall control.  Wherever the A&R IPXL is referred to therein, such reference shall be to the A&R IPXL as amended hereby.  Except as set forth herein, all terms and conditions of the A&R IPXL remain unchanged and in full force and effect.


Sincerely,
BAKER HUGHES, A GE COMPANY, LLC


		
	By
	/s/ Lee Whitley     
Name:  Lee Whitley 
Title:    Corporate Secretary






Accepted and agreed to as of the date first written above:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
		
	By
	/s/ John Godsman     
Name:  John Godsman 
Title:    Vice President








1
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. (the "Company") for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Andrew C. Richardson, as Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
knowledge:



Date: May 7, 2009

By:

/s/ ANDREW C. RICHARDSON Andrew C. Richardson Chief Financial Officer


This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****RULE 13(a)-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Commerce EnergyGroup, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/ A(Amendment No. 2) for the quarterly period endingApril 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), StevenS. Boss, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to his knowledge:          1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and           2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,    in all material respects, the financial condition and result of    operations of the Company. By:     /s/ STEVEN S. BOSS       Steven S. Boss     Chief Executive Officer     (Principal Executive Officer)Date: October 31, 2005