alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018243EN.01001301.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 11.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/13 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.8996 — GIC Group/FPL/JustGroup/JV)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 243/08)

1.

On 4 July 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018243EN.01001301-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Reco Jedi Private Limited (‘Reco’, Singapore), controlled by GIC (Realty) Private Limited (‘GIC’, Singapore), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Frasers Property Ventures II Pte. Ltd. (‘FPV’, Singapore), controlled by Frasers Property Limited (‘FPL’, Singapore), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | JustGroup Holdings Pte. Ltd. (‘JustGroup’, Singapore), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | JustCo Holdings Pte. Ltd. (‘JustCo’, Singapore). |

Reco, FPL and JustGroup acquire within the meaning of Articles 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of JustCo.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for GIC: GIC is the holding company for real estate investments made on behalf of the Government of Singapore,

—   for FPL: FPL owns, develops and manages a diverse, integrated portfolio of properties,

—   for JustGroup and JustCo: the development and management of co-working spaces.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018243EN.01001301-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.8996 — GIC Group/FPL/JustGroup/JV

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018243EN.01001301-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018243EN.01001301-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
EXHIBIT
32







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Premier Alliance Group, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Mark S. Elliott, Acting Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the
Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Premier Alliance Group, Inc., and will be retained by Premier Alliance Group,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.








/s/ Mark S. ElliottMark
      S. ElliottActing
      Chief Executive and Financial OfficerAugust
      15, 2008
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of the
Centurion Funds, Inc.:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements of the
Centurion Funds, Inc. (the "Fund") for the year ended September 30, 2000, we
considered its internal control, including control activities for safeguarding
securities, in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of
expressing our opinion on the financial statements and to comply with the
requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on the internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and maintaining
internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments
by management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs
of controls.  Generally, controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the
entity's objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.  Those controls include the safeguarding of assets against
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or fraud may occur
and not be detected.  Also, projection of any evaluation of internal control
to future periods is subject to the risk that it may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily disclose all
matters in the internal control that might be material weaknesses under
standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants.  A material weakness is a condition in which the design or
operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce to
a relatively low level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in
amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements being
audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in
the normal course of performing their assigned functions.  However, we noted
no matters involving the internal control and its operation, including
controls for safeguarding securities that we consider to be material
weaknesses as defined above.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of management, the
Board of Directors of the Fund, and the Securities and Exchange Commission and
is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these
specified parties.



New York, New York
November 16, 2000
# C_2018157EN.01000101.xml

| 4.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 157/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 157/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8846 — Black Diamond Capital Management/GST Autoleather)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 157/01)

On 24 April 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8846. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8846. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
September 23, 1997

Smith Barney Muni Funds,
388 Greenwich Street,
New York, New York 10013

Dear Sirs:

	In connection with the registration under the Securities Act 
of 1933 (the "Act") of shares (the "Shares") of beneficial 
interest, par value $.001 per share, of Smith Barney Muni Funds, a 
Massachusetts business trust (the "Trust"), we, as your counsel, 
have examined such trust records, certificates and other 
documents, and such questions of law, as we have considered 
necessary or appropriate for the purposes of this opinion.

	Upon the basis of such examination, we advise you that, in 
our opinion, when the Shares are issued and sold in accordance 
with the Trust's Registration Statement on Form N-14 (File No. 33-
12709) under the Act in connection with the acquisition by the 
Trust on behalf of the National Portfolio of all or substantially 
all of the assets, and the assumption of certain liabilities, of 
the Ohio Portfolio, another series of the Trust, and in accordance 
with the Declaration of Trust and By-laws of the Trust, the Shares 
will be validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable by the Trust.

	Under Massachusetts law, shareholders of a Massachusetts 
business trust may, under certain circumstances, be held 
personally liable for the obligations of Smith Barney Muni Funds.  
The Declaration of Trust provides, however, that if a shareholder, 
as such, of Smith Barney Muni Funds is made a party to any suit or 
proceeding to enforce any personal liability, Smith Barney Muni 
Funds shall indemnify and hold each such shareholder harmless from  
and against all claims and liabilities to which such shareholder 
may become subject by reason of his being or having been a 
shareholder.  Thus, the risk of a shareholder's incurring 
financial loss on account of shareholder's liability is limited to 
circumstances in which Smith Barney Muni Funds itself would be 
unable to meet its obligations.

	The foregoing opinion is limited to the laws of the 
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and we are expressing no opinion as 
to the effect of the laws of any other jurisdiction.  With respect 
to all matters of Massachusetts law we have, with your approval, 
relied upon the opinion dated September 23, 1997 of Goodwin, 
Procter & Hoar, and our opinion is subject to the same 
assumptions, qualifications and limitations with respect to such 
matters as are contained in such opinion of Goodwin, Procter & 
Hoar.  We believe you and we are justified in relying on such 
opinion for such matters.

	Also, we have relied as to certain matters on information 
obtained from public officials, officers of the Trust and other 
sources believed by us to be responsible.

	We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an
exhibit to the Trust's Registration Statement.  In giving such consent,
we do not thereby admit that we are in the category of persons whose
consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933.

Very truly yours,
EXHIBIT
        32.2
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
        TO SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
        2002**
 
 Pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Quarterly
        Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the
        “Report”) by China Fire & Security Group, Inc. (the “Registrant”), I, Robert
        Yuan, hereby certify that:
 
 1.
        To the
        best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of
        Section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
        To the
        best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of
        the Registrant.
 Dated:
                  November 14, 2008
              By:
              /s/
                  Robert YuanName: Robert
                  YuanTitle:  
                  Principal Accounting Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002), I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of GrayMark Productions, Inc.(the “Company”), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, theQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the six months ended June30, 2005 (the “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and thatinformation contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  August  12, 2005 | /s/ JOHN SIMONELLI      |
|-----------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                              | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4787 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4787

             To suspend temporarily the duty on Flonicamid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 18, 2007

 Mr. Reynolds introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To suspend temporarily the duty on Flonicamid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FLONICAMID.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by striking heading 
9902.24.57 (relating to Flonicamid) and inserting in numerical sequence 
the following new heading:

``      9902._._        N-(Cyanomethyl)-4-  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (trifluoromethyl)-                                                 31/2011
                         3-
                         pyridinecarboxami
                         de (Flonicamid)
                         (CAS No. 158062-
                         67-0) (provided
                         for in subheading
                         2933.39.27) and
                         any formulations
                         containing such
                         compound
                         (provided for in
                         subheadings
                         3809.91.25 and
                         3808.99.08)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7704
MARK STEVEN STANTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BOYD BENNETT; BONNIE BOYETTE; EDWARD CONN; R. RICH; JAY CLARK, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-01-546-5-BO) Submitted: March 6, 2003 Decided: March 13, 2003 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark Steven Stanton, Appellant Pro Se. James Philip Allen, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Mark Steven Stanton appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Stanton v. Bennett , No. CA-01-546-5-BO (E.D.N.C. filed Oct. 25, 2002, entered Oct. 29, 2002). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1371 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1371

To restore to the Indian Health Service funds sequestered under section 
 251A of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 
to the extent that the percentage reduction for that program exceeded 2 
                                percent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 21, 2013

Ms. McCollum (for herself and Mr. Cole) introduced the following bill; 
           which was referred to the Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To restore to the Indian Health Service funds sequestered under section 
 251A of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 
to the extent that the percentage reduction for that program exceeded 2 
                                percent.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PARTIAL RESTORATION OF SEQUESTERED FUNDS TO THE INDIAN 
              HEALTH SERVICE.

    That portion of the budgetary resources for fiscal year 2013 for 
the Indian Health Service that was cancelled under the sequestration 
order under section 251A(7)(A) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency 
Deficit Control Act of 1985 and that exceeded 2 percent is hereby 
restored. The President shall revise such order only for the accounts 
for such budgetary resources to the extent necessary to carry out the 
previous sentence.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Superior Essex Inc. (the “*Company*”)for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the “*PeriodicReport*”), I, David S. Aldridge, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to thebest of my knowledge and belief, that the Periodic Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| Date: May 9, 2006 | /s/ DAVID S. ALDRIDGE                        |
|-------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|              | David S. Aldridge

*Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Paladin Realty Income Properties, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), the undersigned, the Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company, certifies that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ John A. Gerson                                                                                                        
|John A. Gerson Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Director (Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)



November 14, 2005
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration noaa.gov 1

APPENDIX A: Teacher Pages

Investigating Environmental Issues Procedure Summary

Oyster Sanctuaries in Chesapeake Bay: Events, Problems, and Issues

Concept Map

Research Questions Related to Oyster Sanctuaries

Oyster Sanctuaries Conversation Map – Belief Statements and Value Descriptors
 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration noaa.gov 2

Investigating Environmental Issues Procedure Summary

Student will proceed using the following steps:

 Choose an environmental topic to investigate based on their interests or concerns;

 Conduct background research, and from that research, choose an issue associated with their

chosen topic.

 Evaluate the environmental events, problems, and issues;

 Develop research questions to investigate the issue;

 Determine the knowledge, beliefs, and values of stakeholders involved with the issue;

 Determine how they will collect data that answerstheir research questions;

 Identify the population they want to sample;

 Create survey instruments to collect data;

 Organize the data so that it is easy to communicate (e.g., using graphs, etc.);

 Interpret the data collected, and develop conclusions, and inferences based on the data

collected;

 Identify methods of action, and choose one or more as recommendations to solve an

environmental problem as it relates to their project;

 Write a report about their research;

 Present their research and findings to their teacher and peers;

 Present their research and findings to their peers and the community;

 Create an action plan; and

 Carry out the action plan (optional).

Teacher Note: More detailed information about developing survey instruments, sampling, making 

recommendations, and developing action plans are available in Hungerford, et al, 2003. Additionally, 

student practice activities, student investigation contracts and checklists, and action analysis criteria 

can also be found here.
 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration noaa.gov 3

Oyster Sanctuaries in Chesapeake Bay: Events – Problems – Issues
 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration noaa.gov 4
#### Richard Willard BERNDT, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America.

No. 14811.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

June 22, 1953.

Richard Willard Berndt, pro se.

R. S. Wilson, U. S. Atty., and Charles A. Beasley, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Fort Smith, Ark., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court dismissed, on motion of appellant.