alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018407EN.01000102.xml

| 12.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 407/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 407/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9048 — Delta Electronics/Delta Electronics Thailand)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 407/02)

On 24 October 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9048. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9048. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CEO PURSUANT TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NorthStar Realty Finance
      Corp. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), David T. Hamamoto, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
      knowledge:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




Date:
                November 8, 2006
            By:
            /s/
                David T. HamamotoDavid
                T. Hamamoto
              Chief
                Executive Officer




This
      certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 38446]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13781]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No. 09/09-0496]


HCAP Partners V, L.P.; Notice Seeking Exemption Under Section 312 
of the Small Business Investment Act, Conflicts of Interest

    Notice is hereby given that HCAP Partners V, L.P., 3636 Nobel Dr., 
Suite 401, San Diego, CA 92122, a Federal Licensee under the Small 
Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (``the Act''), in 
connection with the financing of a small concerns, has sought an 
exemption under Section 312 of the Act and Section 107.730, Financings 
which Constitute Conflict of Interest of the Small Business 
Administration (``SBA'') Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). HCAP 
Partners V, L.P. (``HCAP V'') is proposing to provide financing to 
Cubex LLC (``Company'') to support the Company's growth.
    The proposed transaction is brought within the purview of Sec.  
107.730 of the Regulations because HCAP Partners III, L.P. (``HCAP 
III''), an Associate of HCAP V by virtue of Common Control as defined 
in Sec.  107.50, holds a 22% of equity interest in the Company. By 
virtue of HCAP III's equity ownership, the Company and HCAP V are also 
Associates. HCAP III expects to receive $19.5 million from the proposed 
transaction.
    Therefore, the proposed transaction requires a regulatory exemption 
pursuant to 13 CFR 107.730. Notice is hereby given that any interested 
person may submit written comments on the transaction within fifteen 
days of the date of this publication to Associate Administrator for 
Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20416.

Bailey DeVries,
Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation.
[FR Doc. 2022-13781 Filed 6-27-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
Exhibit 32.1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     I, Edward F. Feighan, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer ofProCentury Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:(1) the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2005which this certification accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2) the information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Edward F. Feighan   Edward F. Feighan  Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer  November 10, 2005
HomeOcean Facts

# How do we forecast harmful algal blooms?

## Scientists  can forecast a harmful algal bloom **similar to how a hurricane is forecasted**.

 A boat cuts a green wake—a harmful algal bloom—in Western Lake Erie.

NOAA's Harmful Algal Bloom (HAB) Operational Forecast System in the Gulf of Mexico identifies whether or not a bloom of algae is likely to contain a toxic species, where it is, how big it is, where it's headed, and if it could become more severe in the near future. Like a weather forecast, this system provides officials advance warning to test and close beaches and shellfish beds more precisely and for a shorter period of time.

This system relies on satellite imagery, field observations, models, public health reports, and buoy data to provide information on bloom events. Forecasters create a public HAB conditions report using this data and information to provide the likelihood of respiratory irritation impacts to people in the area.

Expert oceanographers at NOAA analyze available data and models in order to create accurate bulletins. To ensure the highest degree of accuracy, all operational HAB forecasts undergo secondary review prior to dissemination.

*The Harmful Algal Bloom Operational Forecast System depends on the dedication, energy, and feedback from individuals at partner agencies and other organizations working on this issue. Blooms of harmful algae are not unique to the Gulf of Mexico, so NOAA continues to work with local agencies in Maine, Massachusetts, Ohio, Washington, Oregon, California, and elsewhere in the U.S. to make new forecasts operational over the next five years.*

###### **Search** Our Facts

###### Get **Social**

###### More **Information**

          - NOAA Harmful Algal Bloom Operational Forecast System
          - Explore: Harmful Algal Blooms
          - Harmful Algal Blooms (audio podcast)
          - National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science

**Last updated:**   08/02/23**Author:** NOAAHow to cite this article

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
**Exhibit 31.2**
 
 **Certification**
 
 I, Craig E. Eisenacher, certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Bristol West Holdings, Inc.;
 
 2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.  The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b.  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c.  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants third fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.  The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a.  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b.  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.
 
 Date: November 11, 2004/s/ CRAIG E. EISENACHERCraig E. EisenacherSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS JEREMY PAYNE NO. 

### 2023 KW 0799


### OCTOBER 23, 2023

In Re: 

## Jeremy Payne, 

### applying for 

### supervisory writs, 

### 19th Judicial 

### District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 

### DC -22-00675.
BEFORE: WELCH, HOLDRIDGE, AND WOLFE, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. See Duren v. Missouri, 

### 439 U. S. 357, 364, 99 S. Ct. 

### 664, 

### 668, 58 

### L.Ed.2d 579 ( 1979). See also State v. 

## Germany, 2020-00878 ( La. 

### 11/4/ 20), 303 

### So.3d 631, 632 ( per curiam). JEW GH EW
Ashley Wilcox PAGE, Petitioner v. Todd L. HICKS, et al.

No. 19-191

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 12, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1376 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1376

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  369 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive in Jersey City, New Jersey, as the 
          ``Judge Shirley A. Tolentino Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. JUDGE SHIRLEY A. TOLENTINO POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 369 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive in Jersey City, New Jersey, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Judge Shirley A. Tolentino Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Judge 
Shirley A. Tolentino Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 02-1028

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Northern v. * District of Iowa. * Cesar Israel Sierra Gutierrez, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: October 4, 2002 Filed: October 9, 2002

___________ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. In 1999, Cesar Israel Sierra Gutierrez pleaded guilty to reentering the United States illegally as a deported alien, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1326. Applying U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A) (Nov. 1, 1998) (sixteen-level increase for defendant previously convicted for aggravated felony), the district court sentenced Gutierrez to seventy-eight months imprisonment and two years supervised release. Effective November 1, 2001, the Sentencing Commission promulgated Guidelines Amendment 632, which revamped section 2L1.2(b)'s aggravated-felony enhancement to provide for an increase of eight to sixteen levels according to the-2- seriousness of the earlier aggravated felony. See U.S.S.G. App. C at 224-25; U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b) (Nov. 1, 2001). In response, Gutierrez filed a pro se motion to modify his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), arguing Amendment 632 had lowered the authorized term of imprisonment. The district court denied the motion. Gutierrez appeals, and we affirm. Under section 3582(c)(2), a court may reduce a previously imposed sentence when the Sentencing Commission has lowered the applicable sentencing range "if such a reduction is consistent with applicable policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission." The relevant policy statement, section 1B1.10(a), states that a reduction under section 3582(c)(2) is not consistent with the policy statement if "none of the amendments listed in subsection (c)" applies. Amendment 632 is not listed in subsection (c), thus Gutierrez is not entitled to relief. See Delgado v. United States , 162 F.3d 981, 983 (8th Cir. 1998) (amendment not listed in § 1B1.10(c) may not be applied to reduce sentence). Accordingly, we affirm. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
SMITH BARNEY ARIZONA MUNICIPALS FUND INC.
(the "Fund")

Supplement dated February 3, 1999 to 
Prospectus dated September 28, 1998



	The following revises and supersedes, as applicable, the 
discussion under "Portfolio Management":

	Effective February 2, 1999, Joseph Deane is responsible for 
the day-to-day operations of the Fund, including making all 
investment decisions.  Mr. Deane is a Managing Director of Salomon 
Smith Barney and a Portfolio Manager of Mutual Management Corp.




FD 01609
TRAVELERS SERIES FUND INC.
                                10f-3 REPORT
                    May 1, 2002 through October 31, 2002


                    Trade                                        Purchase  %
of
Issuer                   Date      Selling Dealer           Amount

Price          Issue (1)

Alliance Growth Portfolio

L3 Communications        6/24/02        Lehman Brothers
$1,896,100     $56.60         0.23%

Van Kampen Enterprise Portfolio

Polo Ralph Lauren        5/8/02         CS First Boston, Goldman Sachs
25,400      26.50        0.23

AU Optics Corp.               5/22/02        UBS Warburg, Oppenheimer
37,300      11.57        0.01

Smith Barney High Income Portfolio

NMHG Holdings Co.         5/22/02       CS First Boston
260,000     98.766       1.60 (a)
10.000% due 5/15/09

Lyondell Chemical         6/26/02       Banc of America Securities
655,000     99.248       3.60 (b)
8.500% due 12/1/08

CP Ships Ltd.             6/27/02       Morgan Stanley              395,000
97.722         3.00 (c)
8.800% due 12/15/08

Smith Barney Mid Cap Portfolio

Leapfrog Entertainment         7/24/02       Merrill Lynch
12,000       13.00       2.78 (d)

Smith Barney Aggressive Growth Portfolio

CIT Group           7/1/02         Goldman Sachs                 72,725
23.00          0.50 (e)


  (1)  Represents purchases by all affiliated funds; may not exceed 25% of the
     principal amount of the offering.
       (a)  Includes purchases of $3,740,000 by other affiliated mutual funds.
       (b)  Includes purchases of $9,345,000 by other affiliated mutual funds.
       (c)  Includes purchases of $5,605,000 by other affiliated mutual funds.
       (d)  Includes purchases of $3,092,700 by other affiliated mutual funds.
       (e)  Includes purchases of $21,327,325 by other affiliated mutual funds.
STATE of North Carolina v. Carlton Cortez JOHNSON.

No. 639P03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 1, 2004.

Margaret Creasy Ciardella, Wrightsville Beach, for Johnson.

Norma S. Harrell, Special Deputy Attorney General, Edward W. Grannis, Jr., District Attorney, for State of N.C.

Prior report: 161 N.C.App. 68, 587 S.E.2d 445.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 8th day of December 2003 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of April 2004."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th day of December 2003 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of April 2004."
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Integral Technologies, Inc. (the
“:Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
William S. Robinson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








September
29, 2008








/s/ William S. RobinsonWilliam
      S. Robinson, Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATIONSI, Erin E. West, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ProCentury Corporation (“ProCentury”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of ProCentury as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. ProCentury’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for ProCentury and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating toProCentury, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of ProCentury’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures as at the end of the period concerned by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in ProCentury’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during ProCentury’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, ProCentury’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. ProCentury’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to ProCentury’s auditors and theaudit committee of ProCentury’s board of directors: d) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectProCentury’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  e) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in ProCentury’s internal control over financial reporting.       November 10, 2005     Date         /s/ Erin E. West Signature         Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer     Title