alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         The undersigned, John M. Sharpe, Jr., hereby certifies as follows:

         1. I am the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of
Inner Systems, Inc. (the "Company").

         2. To the best of my knowledge, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") complies in all
material respects with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

         3. To the best of my knowledge based upon a review of the Report, the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period
audited.


SIGNATURE                                 TITLE                        DATE


/s/ John M. Sharpe, Jr.        President, Chief Executive        August 12, 2005
-----------------------        Officer and Chief Financial
JOHN M. SHARPE, JR.            Officer
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 772/2006

of 22 May 2006         

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 23 May 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 May 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 386/2005 (OJ L 62, 9.3.2005, p. 3).

----

ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 22 May 2006 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

----

(1)  Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 750/2005 (OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 12). Code ‘            999            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

----
Shirley JOHNSON, Petitioner v. NEW DESTINY CHRISTIAN CENTER CHURCH, INC., et al.

No. 19-279

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Ammex Gold Mining Corp.  (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



3.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.









Date:  May 13, 2008



By: /s/ W. Campbell Birge

-----------------

W. Campbell Birge

Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6768

REESE MARVIN BAKER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus JOSEPH P. SACCHET; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-518-WMN) Submitted: August 15, 2002 Decided: August 20, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Reese Marvin Baker, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Mary Ann Rapp Ince, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Reese Marvin Baker seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Baker v. Sacchet , No. CA-01-518-WMN (D. Md. Apr. 17, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2
  CERTIFICATION
    OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER,
    AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
    2002
    1.
    The accompanying annual report on
    Form 10-K
    for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the
    Report) fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934, as amended; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.
ELLIOTT v. FOOD LION, L.L.C.

No. COA03-1705

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed December 21, 2004

Certification Date January 10, 2005

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1431 

To extend the right of appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board to 

certain employees of the United States Postal Service. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 9, 2013 

Mr. CONNOLLY (for himself and Mr. GRIJALVA) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To extend the right of appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board to certain employees of the United States 

Postal Service. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Postal Employee Ap5 peal Rights Amendments Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RIGHT OF APPEAL TO MERIT SYSTEMS PROTEC7 TION BOARD. 

8 Section 1005(a)(4)(A)(ii)(I) of title 39, United States 

9 Code, is amended to read as follows: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1431 IH

1 ‘‘(I) is a career or noncareer employee of 

2 the Postal Service who— 

3 ‘‘(aa) is not represented by a bar4 gaining representative recognized under 

5 section 1203; and 

6 ‘‘(bb) is in a supervisory, professional, 

7 technical, clerical, administrative, or mana8 gerial position covered by the Executive 

9 and Administrative Schedule; and’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
10.23(c)

                              AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO
                                     TO THE
                           MILLENNIUM CHEMICALS INC.
                       ANNUAL PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE PLAN

          WHEREAS, Millennium Chemicals Inc. (the "Company") maintains the
Millennium Chemicals Inc. Annual Performance Incentive Plan, effective as of
October 1, 1996 (the "Plan");

          WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 10 of the Plan, the Board of Directors of
the Company (the "Board") reserves the right to amend the Plan; and

          WHEREAS, the Board desires to amend the Plan;

          NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of January 1, 1998, the Plan is amended
as follows:

          1. Section 6.4 of the Plan is restated in it entirety as follows:

     The Performance Awards will be paid as soon as administratively feasible
     after the Plan Year in which they are earned, but not before the Committee
     certifies in writing that the Performance Goals specified (except to the
     extent permitted under Code Section 163(m) and provided in Section 7 with
     regard to death, disability, or Change in Control of the Company or certain
     other termination situations) pursuant to subsection 6.2 were, in fact,
     satisfied. The committee shall use its best efforts to make a determination
     with regard to satisfaction of Performance Goals withing two and one-half
     (2 1/2) months after the end of each Plan Year. Notwithstanding the
     foregoing, the Committee may, in its sole discretion, defer the payment of
     all or a portion of a Performance Award payable for any Plan Year and such
     deferred amount (the "Deferred Amount") shall be payable at such time or
     times established by the Committee and shall be subjected to such
     forfeiture conditions, if any, as established by the Committee. Except as
     otherwise provided hereinafter, in no event shall such Deferred Amount
     increase (between the date as of which the Deferred Amount is credited to
     the Participant pursuant to this Section 6.4 until the actual payment date)
     by a measuring factor for each fiscal year greater than the interest rate
     on thirty (30) year Treasury Bonds on the first business day of such fiscal
     year compounded annually. The




<PAGE>


     Committee may in its sole discretion permit any Participant to elect to
     defer all or a portion of any Deferred Amount under the Millennium
     Chemicals Inc. Salary and Bonus Deferral Plan (the "Deferral Plan")
     pursuant to the terms of the Deferral Plan, in lieu of being increased
     as provided in the above sentence; provided, however, that any amount
     deferred under the Deferral Plan shall continue to be subject to the
     forfeiture provisions of the Plan.

          2. In all other respects, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment has been executed the 23rd day of
January, 1998.



                                                       MILLENNIUM CHEMICALS INC.

                                                       By: [ILLEGIBLE]
STATE v. PHELPS

No. COA04-298.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 5, 2004.

Certification Date October 25, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
Christopher LANGDON v. THE N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.

No. 338P00-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 1, 2004.

Christopher Langdon, for Langdon.

Lisa C. Glover, Assistant Attorney General, Robert Crawford, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 22nd day of June 2004 in this matter for a Writ of Mandamus and a Writ of Prohibition Reversing the Order of Superior Court Judge Baker Imposing Sanctions (03CVS173), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Polk County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in Conference this the 1st day of July 2004."

Upon consideration of the petition for Writ of Mandamus and a Writ of Prohibition Reversing the Order of Superior Court Judge Baker Dismissing Plaintiff's Appeal (03CVS173) filed by Plaintiff on the 22nd day of June 2004 in this matter, the following order was entered and is:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of July 2004."
SMITH BARNEY FUNDS, INC.
SHORT-TERM U.S. TREASURY SECURITIES FUND
(the "Portfolio") 

Supplement dated May 27, 1998 to 
April 28, 1998 Prospectus


The following information supplements, and to the extent 
inconsistent therewith, supersedes, the information set forth in 
the Prospectus of the Portfolio dated April 28, 1998 (the 
"Prospectus"):

The Board of Directors of Smith Barney Funds, Inc. has 
approved changes to the investment policies of the Portfolio and 
a related name change.  It is anticipated that these changes will 
become effective on or about July 2, 1998. 

The name of the Portfolio will change to :Short-Term High 
Grade Bond Fund."  The Portfolio's investment objective will 
remain current income, preservation of capital and liquidity; 
however, the Portfolio will be authorized to invest in 
investment-grade corporate debt securities, bank obligations and 
a variety of U.S. government securities (including mortgage-
backed securities and other U.S. government agency securities) in 
seeking to achieve its objective.

The Portfolio will attempt to minimize fluctuations in the 
market value of its portfolio securities by maintaining an 
average weighted maturity of between 1 and 4 years under normal 
conditions.

FD 01462 

g:\funds\sbfi\1998\secdocs\stk598.doc
HomeOcean Facts

# Do alligators live in the ocean? 

## Alligators are primarily freshwater animals and they do not live in the ocean.

An alligator enjoying the sun's rays. Image courtesy of U.S. National Park Service.

There are many things you may encounter when swimming in the  ocean. Alligators probably aren’t one of them.

While alligators can tolerate salt water for a few hours or  even days, they are primarily freshwater animals, living in swampy areas,  rivers, streams, lakes, and ponds.

###### Get **Social**

###### More **Information**

          - American  Alligator (U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service)

**Last updated:**   01/18/24**Author:** NOAAHow to cite this article

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
Jeffrey E. LEE, Petitioner v. FLORIDA

No. 19-5638

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District denied.
See T EX . R. A PP . P

. 52. 8( d) ( “ W hen deny i ng r el i ef , t he cour t m ay han d do w n an opi ni on b ut 1 i s n o t r e q u i re d to d o s o .”) ; T EX . R. A PP . P . 4 7 .4 (d i s ti n g u i s h i n g o p i n i o n s a n d m e m o ra n d u m o p i n i o n s ). 

### NU M BER 13- 09- 0029 3-C V 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG IN RE: TEXAS ASSO CIATION OF SCHOO L BOA RDS, I NC.

On Petit ion fo r Writ of M an da mus . 

## MEM ORA N D U M OPINION Be fo re C hie f J us tice Vald ez an d Ju stice s Yañ ez an d Be na v ide s

M emo rand um Opin ion Pe r Cu riam 1 Rel ator , Texas Ass oci ation of Sc hool Boards, Inc ., filed a pe ti ti on for w ri t of mandamus in the a bov e c ause on J une 1, 2009. The C our t req uest ed and re cei v ed a re spons e to the p eti ti on for w ri t of mandamus from t h e r e al par ty i n i nterest , and furth er re cei v e d a repl y

br ief fil ed by

rela tor

. Rel ator

hasnow

fil ed an unoppos ed moti on to dis mis s t hisori g ina l proceed ing on g ro unds thatthe par ti es hav e settl ed and compromis ed thei r dis pute. R ela tor

thus asks thi s Cou rt to dis mis s the peti ti on for w ri t of mandamus as moot.2

T he Court, having examine d an d f ully conside red the uno ppo sed m otion to dism iss, isof the opi nio n that re lat or has show n itsel f ent it led to the re li ef soug ht. Ac cordin g ly , t he unoppos ed moti on to dis mis s is GRAN TED and the peti ti on for w ri t of manda mus ishereby DI SM ISSE D as moot. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.8( a)

. P E RC U R I A M Me moran dum Opi nio n del ivered and filed thi s 6 th da y

of Aug ust , 200 9.
STATE of North Carolina v. George W. BALDWIN.

No. 47P02-4.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 16, 2004.

George W. Baldwin, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Robert F. Johnson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Defendant on the 10th day of November 2004 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Alamance County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th day of November 2004."
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4842 

To provide for only prospective effect of certain amendments to the Federal 

Sentencing Guidelines relating to cocaine base sentencing. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2007 

Mr. SMITH of Texas (for himself, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. COBLE, Mr. 

GALLEGLY, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. FORBES, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. 

GOHMERT, and Mr. JORDAN of Ohio) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide for only prospective effect of certain amendments 

to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines relating to cocaine 

base sentencing. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That notwithstanding any determination of the United 

4 States Sentencing Commission to the contrary, amend5 ment number 9 of the ‘‘Amendments to the Sentencing 

6 Guidelines, Policy Statements, and Official Commentary’’ 

7 which was submitted by the United States Sentencing 

8 Commission to Congress on May 1, 2007, pursuant to sec9 tion 994(p) of title 28, United States Code, shall apply 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4842 IH

1 only to cases pending on and after the date that amend2 ment took effect. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Modeling Marine Ecosystems With Virtual Reality:

Ocean Food Web Module Worksheet #5

Predator and Prey Biomass Relationships

This worksheet uses data collected previously for worksheets #2 and #4. You do not need to collect

any new data to complete this worksheet. Write in your estimates based on the previously collected

data.

If the biomass of herring in the Gulf of Maine increased by 100,000 tons (from 700,000 up to

800,000), what would you expect to happen to the biomass of cod? Record your estimate in the table

below.

Organism Starting Biomass

(metric tons)

New Biomass

(metric tons)

Cod 70,000

Herring 700,000 800,000

If the biomass of sardines along the West Coast dropped by 500,000 tons (from 1 million to 500

thousand), what would you expect to happen to the biomass of sea lions? What would you expect to

happen to the biomass of orcas? Record your estimates in the table below.

Organism Starting Biomass

(metric tons)

New Biomass

(metric tons)

Orca 1,000

Sea Lion 70,000

Sardine 1,000,000 500,000

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 29, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 38785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13911]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: June 29, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
June 21, 2022, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 750 to Competitive Product List. 
Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2022-75, CP2022-
81.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2022-13911 Filed 6-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Independent Auditors' Consent



To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Travelers Series Fund Inc.:

We consent to, with respect to the Travelers Series Fund Inc., 
the references to our Firm under the headings "Financial 
Highlights" in the Prospectus and  "Independent Auditors" in the 
Statement of Additional Information.



	KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


New York, New York
December 21, 1998
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration noaa.gov 1

NGSS OYSTERS IN THE CHESAPEAKE BAY EDUCATION PROJECT 

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL – K-5th GRADES 2013 WORKSHOP PRESENTERS

National Presbyterian School Annapolis Maritime Museum

Dale Glass Josh Faulk

Monitor National Marine Sanctuary Chesapeake Bay Maritime Museum

Shannon Ricles Kate Livie

NOAA Ocean Service Library of Congress

Molly Harrison Mary-Clare McNatt

Maryland Department of Natural Resources

MIDDLE SCHOOL UNIT Chris Dungan

Anne Arundel Public Schools Maryland Sea Grant

Eric Greenlee Adam Frederick

Alice Hudson

Somerset County Public Schools

Patricia Benner

Merrilee Perko

Pamela South

Wicomico County Public Schools

Katie Seman

NOAA Ocean Service

Peg Steffen

HIGH SCHOOL UNIT

Caroline County Public Schools

Catherine Bornhoeft

Queen Anne’s Public Schools

Kristopher Jensen

Wicomico County Public Schools

Hemalatha Bhaskaran

NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office

Bart Merrick

Donna Stotts

Stephanie Westby