alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Millennium Chemicals Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John E.
Lushefski, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 'SS'1350, as adopted pursuant to 'SS'906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: March 12, 2004


                                            /s/ JOHN E. LUSHEFSKI
                            ----------------------------------------------------
                                              John E. Lushefski
                            Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

This certification, which is required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, is "furnished" to the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance
with Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K, 17 CFR 229.601(b)(32)(ii).
STATE v. HOLLOWAY.

No. COA04-287.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed April 5, 2005.

Certification Date April 25, 2005.

Appeal from Beaufort (02CRS52607).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
David Wayne JORDAN v. STATE of North Carolina.

No. 584P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 3, 2005.

David Wayne Jordan, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, John Carriker, District Attorney, for State of NC.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 17th day of November 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of February 2005."
STATE v. ADAMS

No. COA04-321.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 5, 2004.

Certification Date October 25, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. Remanded for entry of findings.
STATE v. VELARDI.

No. COA04-1164.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed April 5, 2005.

Certification Date April 25, 2005.

Appeal from Henderson, (03CRS1662, 03CRS1663, 03CRS1664, 03CRS1665).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
RICHARDSON v. DEPT. OF PUBLIC INST.

No. 642A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 3, 2005.

Laura E. Crumpler, Assistant Attorney General, for Dept. of Public Instruction.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd day of February 2005 by Plaintiff for Reconsideration:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court In conference this the 3rd day of March 2005."
Exhibit 32.1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     I, Edward F. Feighan, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer ofProCentury Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:(1) the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2007which this certification accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Edward F. Feighan     Edward F. Feighan
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of InfoSonics Corporation (the “Company”) forthe period ended June 30, 2009, Jeffrey Klausner, Chief Financial Officerof the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934  (15 U.S.C. 78m or78o(d)); and

 

(2) the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Date: August 14, 2009 | /s/ JEFFREY KLAUSNER |
|----------------------------|---------------------------|
|                       | Jeffrey Klausner,         |
| * *                   | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-40140

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EUGENIO MONTOYA-CARRILLO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:15-CR-1069-1

Before CLEMENT, GRAVES, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eugenio MontoyaCarrillo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Montoya-Carrillo has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 14, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-40140 Document: 00515157607 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/14/2019
No. 19-40140

2

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 19-40140 Document: 00515157607 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/14/2019
IN RE John Harry STEELE, Petitioner.

No. 19-6484

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
# L_2016140EN.01002601.xml

| 27.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 140/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 140/26

---

Corrigendum to Commission Decision (EU) 2016/827 of 20 May 2016 on the renewal of the mandate of the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 137 of 26 May 2016
  )

The publication of Commission Decision (EU) 2016/827 is to be considered null and void.

---
Neal BENJAMIN, Petitioner v. Jennifer SAAD, Warden

No. 19-6913

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 21, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
				Here's how you know we're official. **Official websites use .gov** A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure websites use HTTPS** A small lock or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to a .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Toggle navigation Toggle search National Ocean Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
 Search
					Search National Ocean Service


Home
				Ocean Facts

				Topics
					Explore All Topics 
                        Arctic 
                        Careers 
                        Economy 
                        Ecosystems 
                        Geodesy 
                        Hazards 
                        International
                        Navigation 
                        Observations 
                        Ocean 
                        Recreation 
                         Sea Level Rise 
                        Story Maps 
                        Tools
                
                			Education

				
				News
				Podcasts
				Video
				Images
				About Us


1. Home
2. Facts
3. What is lightering?

**What is lightering?**  Lightering is **the process of removing oil or other hazardous chemicals** from a compromised vessel to another vessel to prevent oil from spilling into the surrounding waters. A lightering barge being positioned next to the freighter M/V Montrose in 2007. (Photo credit: U.S. Coast Guard)*A lightering barge being positioned next to the freighter M/V*Montrose*in 2007. (Photo credit: U.S. Coast Guard)* Lightering is not possible in all oil spill scenarios. It depends on many factors including the type of oil that is spilled. As time passes, the oil can become more viscous, or thicker, and therefore more difficult to pump. This can, in turn, make lightering difficult, if not impossible. While there are benefits to removing oil in this way, there can also be accidents and spills that result from lightering. Lightering is also used to transfer cargo between vessels of different sizes like a barge and a bulker or oil tanker to reduce the vessel's draft in order to enter port facilities.
 More **Information** Office of Response and Restoration Office of Coast Survey   Get **Social** Social
  **Last updated:** 08/02/23 **Author:** NOAA How to cite this article Contact Us


Feedback Provide Feedback
							Contact Us
							Report an error
 Social Instagram Logo/a>


*Science. Service.Stewardship.*
 About NOS About Us
							NOS Program Offices
							Media Inquiries
							Website Acknowledgements
                            Site Index
							Disclaimer
 More Resources Freedom of Information Act
							Accessibility
							Information Quality
							Privacy Policy
							NOS For Employees
							USA.gov
 Department of Commerce
									National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
									National Ocean Service
# Official Journal L 20/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.020.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 20 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5524 January 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.020.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 20

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5524 January 2012

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | BUDGETS |
| | | 2012/30/EU, Euratom |
| | * | Definitive adoption of amending budget No 6 of the European Union for the financial year 2011 | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

BUDGETS

2012/30/EU, Euratom

*

Definitive adoption of amending budget No 6 of the European Union for the financial year 2011

1

| All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.


  Any revenue provided for in Article 18(1) of the Financial Regulation, entered in Titles 5 and 6 of the statement of revenue, may lead to additional appropriations being entered on the headings which bore the initial expenditure giving rise to the corresponding revenue.


  Figures for outturn refer to all authorised appropriations, including budget appropriations, additional appropriations and earmarked revenue. |
| --- |

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.

Any revenue provided for in Article 18(1) of the Financial Regulation, entered in Titles 5 and 6 of the statement of revenue, may lead to additional appropriations being entered on the headings which bore the initial expenditure giving rise to the corresponding revenue.

Any revenue provided for in Article 18(1) of the Financial Regulation, entered in Titles 5 and 6 of the statement of revenue, may lead to additional appropriations being entered on the headings which bore the initial expenditure giving rise to the corresponding revenue.

Figures for outturn refer to all authorised appropriations, including budget appropriations, additional appropriations and earmarked revenue.

Figures for outturn refer to all authorised appropriations, including budget appropriations, additional appropriations and earmarked revenue.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
PITTS v. NASH DAY HOSPITAL.

No. 22A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 22, 2005.

Barry S. Cobb, James T. Newman, Jr., Raleigh, for Harris, Wilson & OB-GYN Assoc.

Charles Albert, for Jennifer L. Pitts.

James M. Williams, Anne W. Ford, Asheville, for N.C. Association of Defense Attorneys.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st day of March *1382005 by Plaintiff for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed until April 13, 2005. Plaintiff (Jennifer L. Pitts) shall have up to and including the 13th day of April 2005 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 22nd day of March 2005."
EXHIBIT 11

                           NEW YORK HEALTH CARE, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

                                                          For the Years Ended
                                                               December 31,
                                                         -----------------------
                                                            1995         1996
                                                         ----------   ----------
Earnings

 Pro forma net income applicable to common stock         $  689,011   $  316,638
                                                         ==========   ==========

Shares

 Weighted average number of common shares outstanding     2,500,000    2,504,032
 Additional shares assuming exercise of:
  Options with an exercise price of $5.00 or less            23,437       23,437
 Additional shares whose proceeds would be necessary to
  pay the S Corporation dividend                            882,000      882,000
                                                         ----------   ----------

 Weighted average number of common shares and common
  share equivalents outstanding                           3,405,437    3,409,469
                                                         ==========   ==========

 Pro forma net income per common share and common
  share equivalents                                      $      .20   $      .09
                                                         ==========   ==========
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5003 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Tetramethrin. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 16, 2008 

Mrs. TAUSCHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 

Tetramethrin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TETRAMETHRIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.24.34 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended 

6 by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

9 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

10 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
Kevin Lamont PEARSON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6890

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 21, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2004








In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Green Energy Holding Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A, amendment number
1 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report'), I, Robert A. Hildebrand, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 USC ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Dated:
May 13, 2008


/s/ Robert A.
Hildebrand


Robert A. Hildebrand, Chief Financial Officer
Terrence Leonard MATHIS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6655

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

MANUEL SALAIS-VASQUEZ,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 14-10094

D.C. No. 4:13-cr-01766-CKJLAB-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 9, 2015** 

San Francisco California

Before: NOONAN, W. FLETCHER, and DAVIS,*** Circuit Judges. 

FILED

MAR 24 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

 *** The Honorable Andre M. Davis, Senior Circuit Judge for the U.S.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, sitting by designation.
Manuel Salais-Vasquez appeals his conviction by guilty plea and sentence

for illegal re-entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

We review for plain error a claim of a Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 violation where,

as here, the defendant failed to raise the issue below. United States v. Vonn, 535

U.S. 55, 59 (2002). The defendant must show: “(1) an error (2) that was clear or

obvious, (3) that affected substantial rights, and (4) that seriously affected the

fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings.” United States v.

Castillo-Marin, 684 F.3d 914, 918 (9th Cir. 2012). An error under Rule 11 that

affects substantial rights is one for which the defendant can show “a reasonable

probability that, but for the error, he would not have entered the plea.” United

States v. Dominguez Benitez, 542 U.S. 74, 83 (2004). 

We conclude the district court’s failure to provide a general warning as to

the immigration consequences of a guilty plea was not reversible error because

Salais-Vasquez has not shown a reasonable probability that, but for the error, he

would not have pled guilty. The district court erred by failing to warn SalaisVasquez that he would be denied citizenship or admission, as Rule 11 and the

Advisory Committee Notes require. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(b)(1)(O); Fed. R.

Crim. P. 11 Advisory Committee Notes, 2013 Amendment, Subdivision (b)(1)(O). 

2
However, this error did not affect Salais-Vasquez’s substantial rights. See

Dominguez Benitez, 542 U.S. at 83. Salais-Vasquez was already aware, because of

his prior deportation as an alien convicted of murder and kidnapping, that he would

be denied re-entry and citizenship. That Salais-Vasquez knew he crossed the

border illegally confirms he understood he could not enter legally. His guilty plea

here did not change his immigration status, except as to his removal, of which he

was informed by the Magistrate Judge. 

AFFIRMED.

3
Exhibit 31.1 
 CERTIFICATION
 OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Brian Lin, certify that:
 
 1.           I have reviewed this amendment no. 2 to quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of China Fire & Security Group, Inc.
 
 2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
 
 
 Date: September 6, 2011
 
 
 /s/ Brian Lin
 Brian Lin
 Principal Executive Officer
SMITH BARNEY FUNDS INC.
SMITH BARNEY LARGE CAP VALUE FUND

SMITH BARNEY VARIABLE ACCOUNT FUNDS
INCOME AND GROWTH PORTFOLIO

Supplement dated April 12, 2001 to the
Prospectuses dated April 28, 2000

	The following information supersedes as applicable certain
information in the "Management" section set forth in the
Prospectuses dated April 28, 2000, for Smith Barney Large Cap
Value Fund (the "Fund") of Smith Barney Funds Inc. and Income and
Growth Portfolio (the "Portfolio") of Smith Barney Variable
Account Funds:

	Commencing April 11, 2001, Giri Bogavelli, CFA, and a team
of equity portfolio managers assumed responsibility for the day
to day management of the Portfolio and Fund.  Mr. Bogavelli is
currently Vice President of Smith Barney Fund Management LLC, the
Portfolio/Fund's Investment Manager and Managing Director of the
Smith Barney Capital Management Division of Salomon Smith Barney
Inc.  Prior to this position he was Assistant Director of
Research at Citibank Global Asset Management, a division of
Citibank, N.A.  Previously, he was Director of Research and
Senior Portfolio Manager at Spare, Kaplan, Bischel & Associates.
Mr. Bogavelli has 12 years of securities business experience.


FD02293
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2843

WILLIAM SANFORD GADD; EDDIE BRADFORD LEE,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

and

CANAAN PROJECT; CORNERSTONE; D&J TRUST; FLAX

TRUST; GEMINI TRUST; GLOBAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION; H.F.S. TRUST; HIGHLANDER TRUST; J.E.L.

TRUST; RAINBOW ENT TRUST; ROAD TO FREEDOM;

SILVER WILL TRUST; TREE TRUST; TRS TRUST,

Plaintiffs,

versus

ROBERT RUBIN, Secretary of the Treasury; LISA

GRIGG; MICHAEL C. STENGER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief

District Judge. (CA-97-639-MU)

Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 19, 1999

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Sanford Gadd, Eddie Bradford Lee, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

William Sanford Gadd and Eddie Bradford Lee appeal the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss

their complaint for failure to state a claim and for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. See Gadd v.

Rubin, No. CA-97-639-MU (W.D.N.C. Dec. 9, 1998). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED