alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
thg-ex101_90.htm



Exhibit 10.1

The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. 

2019-2020 Compensation of Non-Employee Directors 

— For the annual service period beginning on May 14, 2019, the date of the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders— 

 


	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Standard Fees
	
  
	
Description

	
Annual Director Retainer
	
  
	
 

	
- Stock Component
	
  
	
- $135,000 valuation

	
 
	
  
	
- Granted on May 14, 2019. Issued pursuant to the Company’s 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan”)

	
- Cash Component
	
  
	
- $95,000

	
 
	
  
	
- Payable on or after May 14, 2019

	
 
	
 

	
Committee Chairperson Annual Retainer (amount includes Committee Annual Retainer)
	
  
	
- $21,000 for the chairperson of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, payable on or after May 14, 2019

	
 
	
  
	
- $25,000 for the chairperson of the Compensation Committee, payable on or after May 14, 2019

	
 
	
  
	
- $36,000 for the chairperson of the Audit Committee, payable on or after May 14, 2019

	
 
	
 

	
Chair of the Board Retainer
	
  
	
- $125,000 

- Payable on or after May 14, 2019 

 

	
Committee Annual Retainer
	
  
	
- $10,000 for each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (excluding the Committee Chairperson), payable on or after May 14, 2019

	
 
	
  
	
- $11,000 for each member of the Compensation Committee (excluding the Committee Chairperson), payable on or after May 14, 2019

	
 
	
  
	
- $15,000 for each member of the Audit Committee (excluding the Committee Chairperson), payable on or after May 14, 2019

	
 
	
 

	
Deferred Compensation Plan
	
  
	
- Directors may defer receipt of their cash and stock compensation (including any cash compensation that is converted into stock under the Conversion Program). Deferred cash amounts are accrued in a memorandum account that is credited with interest derived from the so-called General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) Rate (3.36% in 2019). All deferrals are pursuant to The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. Non-Employee Director Deferral Plan.

 
	
	
Conversion Program
	
  
	
- At the election of each director, cash retainers may be converted into Common Stock of the Company with such stock issued pursuant to the 2014 Plan
	






	
 
	
 
	
	
Reimbursable Expenses
	
  
	
- Travel and related expenses incurred in connection with service on the Board of Directors and its Committees  

 
	
	
Matching Charitable Contributions
	
  
	
- Company will provide matching contributions to qualified charitable organizations up to $5,000 per director per year
Exhibit 10.1

Summary of Named Executive Officers 2007 Annual Base Salaries



|                      |  |                                                    |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Name                  |  | Title                                              |  | 2007 Annual Base Salary
|Michael J. Sonnenfeld |  | Director, President and Chief Executive Officer    |  | $427,000               
|                      |  |                                                   
|Nayan V. Kisnadwala   |  | Executive Vice President  Chief Financial Officer |  | $395,000               
|                      |  |                                                   
|Walter P. Buczynski   |  | Executive Vice President  Secondary               |  | $330,800               
|                      |  |                                                   
|James T. Hagan, Jr.   |  | Executive Vice President  Production              |  | $200,000               
|                      |  |                                                   
|John C. Camp, IV      |  | Senior Vice President  Chief Information Officer  |  | $220,500               
|                      |  |                                                   
|Teresa A. McDermott   |  | Senior Vice President  Controller                 |  | $184,800               
|                      |  |                                                   
|Gary K. Uchino        |  | Senior Vice President  Chief Credit Officer       |  | $216,300
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Green Energy Holding Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof(the "Report'), Robert A. Hildebrand, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 USC ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
May 13, 2008


/s/ Robert A.
Hildebrand


Robert A. Hildebrand, Chief Financial Officer
STATE of North Carolina v. James McDONALD and State of North Carolina v. Linwood Earl Forte.

No. 208P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 24, 2004.

Andrew G. Schopler, Chapel Hill, for James McDonald.

Kimberly W. Duffley, Assistant Attorney General, William David McFadyen, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th day of May 2004 by Defendant (McDonald) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4820 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4820

        To extend the temporary suspension of duty on N-[[(4,6-
      dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]-3-(ethylsulfonyl)-2-
             pyridinesulfonamide and application adjuvants.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 18, 2007

  Mr. LaHood introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To extend the temporary suspension of duty on N-[[(4,6-
      dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]-3-(ethylsulfonyl)-2-
             pyridinesulfonamide and application adjuvants.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. N-[[(4,6-DIMETHOXYPYRIMIDIN-2-YL)AMINO]CARBONYL]-3-
              (ETHYLSULFONYL)-2-PYRIDINESULFONAMIDE AND APPLICATION 
              ADJUVANTS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.33.60 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Northridge Ventures Inc. on Form 10-Q
for  the  quarter  ended  November  30,  2010  as  filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Caroline Rechia, Chief
Executive  Officer,  President, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer  of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1)     The  Report  fully  complies  with  the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended;  and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.



Date:  January  14,  2010                    By:  /s/  Caroline  Rechia
                                             Caroline Rechia
                                             President, Chief Executive Officer,
                                             Chief Financial Officer and
                                             Principal Accounting Officer
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1938/2005

of 25 November 2005         

establishing the allocation of export licences for cheese to be exported to the United States of America in 2006 under certain GATT quotas

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 174/1999 of 26 January 1999 laying down special detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 as regards export licences and export refunds in the case of milk and milk products (2), and in particular Article 20(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Applications for provisional export licences lodged pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1519/2005 in respect of the product groups and quotas identified by 16-Tokyo, 16-, 17-, 18-, 20- and 21-Uruguay, 25-Tokyo and 25-Uruguay in column 3 of the Annex to this Regulation shall be accepted subject to:

Article 2

Applications for provisional export licences lodged pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1519/2005 in respect of the product groups and quotas identified by 22-Tokyo and 22-Uruguay in column 3 of the Annex to this Regulation shall be accepted subject to:

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 November 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

(2)OJ L 20, 27.1.1999, p. 8. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1513/2005 (OJ L 241, 17.9.2005, p. 45).

(3)OJ L 244, 20.9.2005, p. 13.

----

ANNEX

----
FINAL PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

(PEIS) FOR SURVEYING AND MAPPING PROJECTS IN U.S.

WATERS FOR COASTAL AND MARINE DATA ACQUISITION

ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE (EJ)

▪ Assessing EJ under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) considers any disproportionately high

and adverse human health or environmental effects to minority and low-income populations.

▪ The Final PEIS considers potential disproportionately high and adverse impacts on minority and lowincome populations that hunt marine mammals and fish for subsistence uses. 

Subsistence uses include “customary

and traditional” uses of wild resources for

food, shelter, fuel, clothing, tools,

transportation, handicrafts, barter, and

customary trade.

These communities rely on harvests of

whales, seals, sea lions, and other

marine mammals (subsistence

hunting), as well as fish species such as

salmon, halibut, and cod (subsistence

fishing) for their nutritional, religious, and

cultural needs.

Photo Credit: NOAA Photo Library oceanservice.noaa.gov/about/environmental-compliance/surveying-mapping.html

NOS surveying and mapping activities would have an adverse impact on subsistence hunting and fishing

activities primarily including behavioral disruptions in individual animals that could increase the hunting

difficulty. NOS activities could also have a beneficial impact on EJ communities from the availability of new

mapping and charting information. Both beneficial and adverse impacts would increase incrementally from

Alternatives A to C. The overall impact of the Proposed Action on the subsistence, economy, and culture of EJ

communities would be adverse, minor to moderate, and insignificant.

Source: International Whaling Commission

Environmental 

Consequences 

from NOS 

Activities

▪ Active underwater acoustic sources

▪ Vessel and equipment sound - underwater and airborne

▪ Vessel and equipment presence

▪ Human presence related to NOS activities

▪ Availability of new mapping and charting information

NOS activities that could impact EJ communities

Bowhead Whale Harvest Celebration in Point Hope, AK
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel, June 27, 2022, 08:00 a.m. to June 28, 2022, 03:00 p.m., National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on June 07, 2022, FR Doc 2022-12174, 87 FR 34694.                

This notice is being amended to change the dates of this meeting from June 27-28, 2022, to July 11-12, 2022. The meeting time remains the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

      ( print page 38765)    
Dated: June 23, 2022.

Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-13798 Filed 6-28-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Section 2. Moving Islands
What moves them...

What are the 2 major processes that 

move barrier islands?
Sea-level Rise

• Current rate of global sea-level rise is about 0.11 inches per year

• “Relative”, or local sea-level rise may be much higher

• Sea-level was much lower 20,000 years ago than today- LAST GLACIAL MAXIMUM

• Around 120,000 years ago, sea-level was about 26 feet higher than it is today
Storms

• Hurricanes and nor’easters erode 

material from oceanside and 

deposit landward of the beach

• This process is called 

OVERWASH

WASHOVER

FAN
Barrier Island Transgression

Ocean

Lagoon
How do we study island change?

 USING SEDIMENT CORES!
Coring
NUVO PHARMACEUTICALS (IRELAND) DESIGNATED ACTIVITY COMPANY, et al., Petitioners v. DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES INC., et al.

No. 19-584

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Antonio ESCOBAR, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6885

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-6-2022]

On February 22, 2022, Pfizer, Inc. submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within Subzone 43E, in Kalamazoo, Michigan.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (87 FR 11410, March 1, 2022). On June 22, 2022, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including Section 400.14.                

Dated: June 22, 2022.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-13662 Filed 6-24-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANNY FABRICANT,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

G. J. BISSETTE, Associate Warden at USP

Tucson; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 19

- 16797

D.C. No. 4:19

- cv

- 00030

- JGZ

PSOT

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 2, 2020 * *

Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Federal prisoner Danny Fabricant appeals pro se from the district court’s

judgment dismissing his action brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named

Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971), alleging

constitutional violations . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 9 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 16797

review de novo the district court’s dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A

. Resnick v.

Hayes , 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000). We may affirm on any basis supported

by the record. Thompson v. Paul , 547 F.3d 1055 , 1058

- 59 (9th Cir. 2008). We

affirm.

Dismissal of Fabricant’s action was proper because , even if a Bivens remedy

is available for his constitutional claims, Fabricant failed to allege facts sufficient

to state a plausible claim. See Hebbe v. Pliler , 627 F.3d 338, 341

- 42 (9th Cir.

2010) (although pro se pleadings are construed liberally , a plaintiff must allege

facts sufficient to state a plausible claim); Long v. County of Los A ngeles , 442 F.3d

1178, 1185 (9th Cir. 2006) ( setting forth elements of a § 1983 claim) ; Van Strum v.

Lawn , 940 F.2d 406, 409 (9th Cir. 1991) (“ Actions under § 1983 and those under

Bivens are identical save for the replacement of a state actor under § 198 3 by a

federal actor under Bivens. ”).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the first amended

complaint without further leave to amend because amendment would have be en

futile. See Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. , 656 F.3 d 1034, 1041 (9th

Cir. 2011) (setting forth standard of review and explaining that dismissal without

leave to amend is proper whe n amendment would be futile).

Fabricant’s motion for an order related to mail (Docket Entry No. 6) is3 19

- 16797

denied.

AFF I RMED.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4810 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mixtures of 2-amino-2,3- 

dimethylbutanenitrile and toluene. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 18, 2007 

Mr. HULSHOF introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mixtures 

of 2-amino-2,3-dimethylbutanenitrile and toluene. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF 2-AMINO-2,3- 

4 DIMETHYLBUTANENITRILE AND TOLUENE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.24.18 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended 

7 by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4810 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS