alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit








 
Solasglas Investments, LP
c/o DME Advisors II, LLC
140 East 45th Street, 24th Floor
New York, NY 10017


June 18, 2019


Greenlight Reinsurance, Ltd.
Greenlight Reinsurance Ireland, DAC
65 Market Street, Suite 1207
Camana Bay
P.O. Box 31110
Grand Cayman, KY1-1205
Cayman Islands




This letter agreement is being entered into in connection with the investments by Greenlight Reinsurance, Ltd. (“Greenlight Re”) and Greenlight Reinsurance Ireland, DAC (“GRIL”) in Solasglas Investments, LP, a Cayman Islands exempted limited partnership (the “Partnership”), pursuant to the amended and restated exempted limited partnership agreement of the Partnership, dated August 30, 2018 and effective September 1, 2018 as amended by an amendment dated February 26, 2019 (the “Partnership Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings given to them in the Partnership Agreement.


The General Partner and the Investment Advisor each hereby agree that during the period from June 1, 2019 until December 31, 2019, (a) not less than 50% of the Investment Portfolio of each of Greenlight Re and GRIL shall be held in cash and cash equivalents, and (b) the portion of the Investment Portfolio of each of Greenlight Re and GRIL that is held in cash or cash equivalents will not be subject to any Management Fee or Performance Allocation.


This letter agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each one of which will be deemed an original, and all of which together will constitute one and the same agreement. This letter agreement may not be amended or modified without the written consent of all of the parties hereto.
 
This letter agreement constitutes a valid and binding agreement of the parties hereto, enforceable against each party in accordance with its terms.













If the above correctly reflects your understanding and agreement with respect to the foregoing matters, please so confirm by signing and returning the enclosed copy of this letter agreement.
Very truly yours, 




DME ADVISORS II, LLC


By: /s/ Daniel Roitman                  
Name:  Daniel Roitman
Title:  COO






DME ADVISORS, LP


By: /s/ Daniel Roitman                    
Name:  Daniel Roitman
Title: COO




Accepted and agreed as of the date first written above:




GREENLIGHT REINSURANCE, LTD.


By: /s/ Simon Burton             
Name: Simon Burton
Title: CEO    




GREENLIGHT REINSURANCE IRELAND, DAC


By: /s/ Tim Courtis                
Name: Tim Courtis
Title: Director
EXHIBIT
32







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Premier Alliance Group, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Mark S. Elliott, Acting Chief Executive and Financial Officer of
the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Premier Alliance Group, Inc., and will be retained by Premier Alliance Group,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.








/s/ Mark S. Elliott


Mark S.
Elliott


Acting
Chief Executive and Financial
Officer


November
13,
2008
# Fourth Court of Appeals

S an Antonio, Texas

July 23, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00070

- CV

SKYLINE EMS INC. and Juan “Johnny” Cordero,

Appellant s

v.

AR CONCEPTS INC.

, Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 15618

The Honorable Richard E. Price, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Ap pell ee ’ s brief wa s due on July 13 , 2015. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6( b ). On July 20

, 2015

, A ppell ee f

iled a n unopposed first motion for a n extension of time to file its brief until
August 17 , 2015 , for an extension of thirty

- five days

. Appell ee ’ s motion is GRANTED. Appell ee must file its brief with this court by August

17 , 2015.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 23rd day of July, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
7 Oceanservice.noaa.gov 7

NAME:_______________________________________ DATE __________________

STUDENT DATA SHEET 1

ANIMALS OF THE CHESAPEAKE IN THE 1600S

ANIMAL SPECIES ABUNDANCE

 Summarize what the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem was like in the 1600s
 Oceanservice.noa.gov

NAME: DATE:

STUDENT DATA SHEET 2

HABITAT DESCRIPTION OF HABITAT

Riparian Forests

(forest next to a waterway)

Freshwater Tributaries

(river or stream)

Shallow Water with Bay Grasses

Open Water

Islands and Inlands

After reading about the condition of the bay in 1600, state whether or not the Chesapeake Bay

habitats were in good condition or poor condition during the 1600s. Include information from the

readings to support your answer.
 Oceanservice.noa.gov

STUDENT DATA SHEET 3

NAME: DATE: _

CHESAPEAKE BAY REPORT CARD IN THE 1600S

You now have a good idea of what the Chesapeake Bay was like in the 1600s. The Chesapeake Bay

Foundation makes a report card for the Chesapeake Bay each year. They grade different parts of the

Bay according to how healthy they are. Now it is your job to complete a report card on the health of

the Chesapeake Bay in the 1600s.

Listed below are categories for habitats and animals found by explorers in the 1600s. Based

upon what you have learned in this lesson, assign a number grade from zero to 100 to each of the

habitats and animals. Use the grading system below.

HEALTH OF THE BAY IN THE 1600S 

REPORT CARD

OVERALL GRADE FOR THE CHESAPEAKE IN THE 1600S:

OVERALL GRADE FOR THE CHESAPEAKE TODAY ______________

HABITAT OR ANIMAL

 Grade for 1600

 Chesapeake

Grade for Present Day 

Chesapeake

 Wetlands/Marshes

Underwater(Aquatic) Grasses

 Oysters and Oyster bars

Rockfish/Striped Bass

 Water Clarity

 Forested Buffers

 Blue Crab

90 –100

80 – 89

70 – 79

60 – 69

50 and below

Very Good

Good

Fair

Poor

Failing
**Exhibit31**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Patrick G. Adams, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, certifythat:

 

1.                                       I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-QSB of First Metroplex Capital, Inc.;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, thisquarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition and results of operations of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this quarterly report;

 

4.             I am responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:

 

a)                                      designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant is made known to me by others employed by the registrant,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;

 

b)                                     evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of adate within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarter report (the“Evaluation Date”); and

 

c)                                      presented in thisquarterly report in conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.             I have disclosed, based on my mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a)                                      all significant deficiencies in the design oroperation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have         identified for the registrant’sauditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b)                                     any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls; and

 

6.             I have indicated in this quarterlyreport whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or inother factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent tothe Evaluation Date, including any corrective actions with regard tosignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

Date:  June 14, 2004

 
| /s/  Patrick G. Adams                         |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
| Patrick  G. Adams                             |
| Chief Executive Officer                       |
| (Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

1

----
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1494 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1494

 To direct the Secretary of Defense to review the operation of certain 
         ships during the Vietnam Era, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 11, 2013

   Mr. Gibson (for himself, Mr. Connolly, Ms. Norton, Mr. Griffin of 
    Arkansas, Mr. Cicilline, Ms. Kuster, Mr. Stivers, Mr. Brady of 
 Pennsylvania, Ms. Shea-Porter, Mr. Grimm, Mr. Owens, Mrs. McCarthy of 
  New York, Ms. Meng, Ms. Bordallo, Mr. Castro of Texas, Mr. Young of 
 Alaska, Mr. Walz, Mr. Poe of Texas, and Mr. Courtney) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services, 
and in addition to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, for a period to 
      be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of Defense to review the operation of certain 
         ships during the Vietnam Era, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Blue Water Navy Ship Accountability 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REVIEW OF OPERATION OF CERTAIN SHIPS DURING THE VIETNAM ERA.

    (a) Review Required.--By not later than one year after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall review the 
logs of each ship under the authority of the Secretary of the Navy that 
is known to have operated in the waters near Vietnam during the Vietnam 
Era (as that term is defined in section 101(29) of title 38, United 
States Code) to determine--
            (1) whether each such ship operated in the territorial 
        waters of the Republic of Vietnam during the period beginning 
        on January 9, 1962, and ending on May 7, 1975; and
            (2) for each such ship that so operated--
                    (A) the date or dates when the ship so operated; 
                and
                    (B) the distance from the shore of the location 
                where the ship operated that was the closest proximity 
                to shore.
    (b) Provision of Information to the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs.--Upon a determination that any such ship so operated, the 
Secretary of Defense shall provide such determination, together with 
the information described in subsection (a)(2) about the ship, to the 
Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
    (c) Public Availability of Information.--The Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs shall make publicly available all unclassified information 
provided to the Secretary under subsection (b).
                                 <all>
```
# C_2016261EN.01000201.xml

| 19.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/2

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 18 July 2016

appointing a member and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work for Romania

(2016/C 261/03)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Decision of 22 July 2003 setting up an Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work (1), and in particular Article 3 thereof,

1

Having regard to the list of candidates submitted to the Council by the Governments of the Member States,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decisions of 24 February 2016 (2), 11 April 2016 (3) and 9 June 2016 (4) the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work for the period from 29 February 2016 to 28 February 2019. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decisions of 24 February 2016 (2), 11 April 2016 (3) and 9 June 2016 (4) the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work for the period from 29 February 2016 to 28 February 2019.

2

3

4

| (2) | The government of Romania has submitted further nominations for three posts to be filled, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The government of Romania has submitted further nominations for three posts to be filled,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed as member and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work for the period ending on 28 February 2019:

TRADE UNION REPRESENTATIVES

| Country | Member | Alternates |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Romania | Ms Mihaela DARLE | Mr Corneliu CONSTANTINOAIA
  Mr Dumitru FORNEA |

Country

Member

Alternates

Romania

Ms Mihaela DARLE

Mr Corneliu CONSTANTINOAIA

Mr Dumitru FORNEA

Article 2

The Council will appoint the members and alternate members not yet nominated at a later date.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 18 July 2016.

For the Council

The President

Gabriela MATEČNÁ

---

(1)  OJ C 218, 13.9.2003, p. 1.

1

(2)  Council Decision of 24 February 2016 appointing the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work (OJ C 79, 1.3.2016, p. 1).

2

(3)  Council Decision of 11 April 2016 appointing the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work for Greece, Hungary and Sweden (OJ C 130, 13.4.2016, p. 3).

3

(4)  Council Decision of 9 June 2016 appointing a member and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work for Romania (OJ C 214, 15.6.2016, p. 2).

4

---
# L_2016269EN.01001301.xml

| 4.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 269/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 269/13

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU, Euratom) 2016/1763

of 29 September 2016

appointing three members of the Court of Auditors

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 286(2) thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to the proposals by the Republic of Cyprus, Malta and the Portuguese Republic,

Having regard to the opinions of the European Parliament (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | The term of office of Mr Louis GALEA expired on 6 May 2016. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The term of office of Mr Louis GALEA expired on 6 May 2016.

| (2) | The term of office of Mr Lazaros S. LAZAROU is due to expire on 1 November 2016. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The term of office of Mr Lazaros S. LAZAROU is due to expire on 1 November 2016.

| (3) | By letter dated 20 May 2016, Mr Vítor Manuel da SILVA CALDEIRA announced his resignation. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

By letter dated 20 May 2016, Mr Vítor Manuel da SILVA CALDEIRA announced his resignation.

| (4) | New appointments should therefore be made, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

New appointments should therefore be made,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

1.   Mr Leo BRINCAT is hereby appointed member of the Court of Auditors for the period from 1 October 2016 to 30 September 2022.

2.   Mr Lazaros S. LAZAROU is hereby appointed member of the Court of Auditors for the period from 2 November 2016 to 1 November 2022.

3.   Mr João Alexandre TAVARES GONÇALVES DE FIGUEIREDO is hereby appointed member of the Court of Auditors for the period from 1 October 2016 to 28 February 2018.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 29 September 2016.

For the Council

The President

P. ŽIGA

---

(1)  Opinions of 13 September 2016 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

1

---
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. §1350





(SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





I,
Raymond Li, Chief Financial Officer (principal executive officer) of
China-Biotics, Inc. (the "Registrant"), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based
upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December
31, 2008 of the Registrant (the “Report”):





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of The
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




/s/
      Raymond LiRaymond
      LiChief
      Financial OfficerFebruary
      13, 2009
Opinion issued September 27 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 16
- 00253
- CR

——————————— KYLE JACKSON , Appella nt

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appell e e
On Appeal from the Co unty Crim inal C our t at Law No . 3

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2075847

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Kyle Jackson, pleaded guilty to the misdemeanor offense of assault of a family member. The trial court found appellant guilty and, in accordance with the terms of appellant’s plea bargain agreement with the State, sentenced appellant2

to 355 days’ incarceration in county jail with 2 days credit. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal. In a plea bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that wer e raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d). The trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See id . T he trial court’s certification states that this is a plea bargain case and that the defendant has no right of appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. A pp. 2005). Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must dismiss this appeal. See Chavez v. State , 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who plea

- bargained is permit ted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Bland, Massengale, and Lloyd. Do not publish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2(b).
# Official Journal L 90/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 90 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6325 March 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 90

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6325 March 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2020/436 of 24 March 2020 amending Regulation (EC) No 906/2009 as regards its period of application (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2020/436 of 24 March 2020 amending Regulation (EC) No 906/2009 as regards its period of application (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
STATE of North Carolina v. John Arthur TERRELL III.

No. 582P03-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2004.

John A. Terrell, III, Pro Se.

John W. Congleton, Assistant Attorney General, John Carriker, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 15th day of December 2003 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2004."
# CE2004065EN.01012702.xml

| 13.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 65/127 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 65/127

---

(2004/C 65 E/142)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2295/03

by Christopher Huhne (ELDR) to the Commission

(11 July 2003)

Subject:   EU funded projects

Subject:

Will the Commission list the projects for which EU funds (including any EIB loans) were committed, and for which funds were disbursed, during the last financial year in Hampshire/Kent/Surrey/west Sussex/east Sussex/Isle of Wight/Oxfordshire/Berkshire/Buckinghamshire?

Supplementary answer given by Mr Prodi on behalf of the Commission

(11 November 2003)

(11 November 2003)

In view of the length of its answer, the Commission is sending it direct to the Honourable Member and to Parliament's Secretariat.

---