alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Important legal notice**

*|*

# 12004V355

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE VI — THE FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - CHAPTER I — PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INSTITUTIONS - Section 1 — The institutions - Subsection 5 — The Court of Justice of the European Union - Article III-355***Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0156 - 0156*

Article III-355

The Judges and Advocates-General of the Court of Justice shall be chosen from persons whose independence is beyond doubt and who possess the qualifications required for appointment to the highest judicial offices in their respective countries or who are jurisconsults of recognised competence; they shall be appointed by common accord of the governments of the Member States after consultation of the panel provided for in Article III-357.

Every three years there shall be a partial replacement of the Judges and Advocates-General, in accordance with the conditions laid down in the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union.

The Judges shall elect the President of the Court of Justice from among their number for a term of three years. He or she may be re-elected.

The Court of Justice shall adopt its Rules of Procedure. Those Rules shall require the consent of the Council.

--------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 29, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 38757]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13827]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES


Intent To Conduct a Detailed Economic Impact Analysis

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Charter of the Export-Import Bank of the 
United States, this notice is to inform the public that the Export-
Import Bank of the United States has received an application for a $525 
million long-term loan guarantee to support the export of approximately 
$366 million worth of U.S. engineering services, design services, 
licenses, catalysts, and refining equipment. The U.S. goods and 
services will be exported to Malaysia and establish production capacity 
of refined petrochemicals. New capacity from the project is anticipated 
to produce 718 thousand metric tons per year of jet fuel, 961 thousand 
metric tons per year of light naphtha, 460 thousand metric tons per 
year of low sulfur fuel oil, 1.68 million metric tons per year of 
paraxylene, and 591 thousand metric tons per year of benzene. 
Production of paraxylene and benzene will primarily be sold to China, 
while production of jet fuel, light naphtha, low sulfur fuel oil will 
primarily be sold regionally in Southeast Asia.

DATES: Comments are due 14 days from publication in the Federal 
Register.

ADDRESSES: Interested parties may submit comments on this transaction 
electronically on www.regulations.gov, or by email to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2742444849484a4e44094e4a5746445367425f4e4a09404851"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="abcec8c4c5c4c6c2c885c2c6dbcac8dfebced3c2c685ccc4dd">[email protected]</span></a>.

Eric Larger,
Office of Policy Analysis and International Relations.
[FR Doc. 2022-13827 Filed 6-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA PR24-0006

IN RE MOTION FORADMISSION UPON UNIFORM BAREXAMINATION SCORE TRANSFER 

### r:D OCT - 1 2024 Bowren UrE,.er

- wood Clc..rt< ORDER

Matthew Bopp has filed a petition for admission to the State Bar of Montana pursuant to Rule IV of the Rules for Admission to the Bar of the State of Montana, governing admission upon Uniform Bar Examination score transfer. The Bar Admissions Administrator ofthe State Bar ofMontana has informed the Court that the Commission on Character and Fitness has certified that Bopp has provided the necessary documentation andhas satisfiedthe requirementsprerequisite to admission under Rule IV ofthe Rules for Admission to the State Bar ofMontana. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and competition of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions Administrator, Matthew Bopp may be sworn in to the practice of law in the State of Montana. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis order to the Petitioner and the State Bar ofMontana. DATED this ( day ofOctober, 2024.



# / ChiefJustice 10/01/2024

Case Number: PR 24-0006

# calm Justices
Liddon YOUNG, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6262

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Exhibit 33.22  LOGO REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONS REGULATION AB SERVICING
CRITERIA For the calendar year ending December 31, 2018, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for Wells Fargo
Bank N.A.(the Servicer). National Tax Search, LLC (NTS) is responsible for assessing compliance as
of December 31, 2018 and for the period from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the Reporting Period) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations
(the CFR). NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122(d)(l)(ii), 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122 (d)(2)(v),
1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the Applicable Servicing Criteria) are applicable to the activities NTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of
the Servicer using NTSs TaxQ system (the Platform Transactions). NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that NTS has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2018 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform
Transactions taken as a whole. Plante & Moran, PLLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation
report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2018 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion. National Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor to Servicer  LOGO Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO January 25, 2019 130 S. Jefferson Street Suite300 Chicago, IL 60661
STATE v. WILLIAMS.

No. COA03-1335.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 20, 2004.

Certification Date August 9, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5030 

AN ACT 

For the relief of Corina de Chalup Turcinovic. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5030 EH

1 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR CORINA 

2 DE CHALUP TURCINOVIC. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

4 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

5 Act, Corina de Chalup Turcinovic shall be eligible for 

6 issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 

7 to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent resi8 dence upon filing an application for issuance of an immi9 grant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment 

10 of status to lawful permanent resident. 

11 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Corina de Chalup 

12 Turcinovic enters the United States before the filing dead13 line specified in subsection (c), she shall be considered to 

14 have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise 

15 eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 

16 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date 

17 of the enactment of this Act. 

18 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

19 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap20 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica21 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

22 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

23 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

24 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res25 idence to Corina de Chalup Turcinovic, the Secretary of 

26 State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, dur-
3 

•HR 5030 EH

1 ing the current or next following fiscal year, the total num2 ber of immigrant visas that are made available to natives 

3 of the country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) 

4 of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, 

5 the total number of immigrant visas that are made avail6 able to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under 

7 section 202(e) of such Act. 

8 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

9 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 

10 parents, brothers, and sisters of Corina de Chalup 

11 Turcinovic shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be ac12 corded any right, privilege, or status under the Immigra13 tion and Nationality Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 16, 

2008. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5030 

AN ACT 

For the relief of Corina de Chalup Turcinovic.
Board of Trustees of
the Smith Barney Sector Series Inc.:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements of Smith
Barney Natural Resources Fund  (the "Fund") of Smith Barney Sector Series Inc.
for the year ended October 31, 2000, we considered its internal control,
including control procedures for safeguarding securities, in order to
determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on
the financial statements and to comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR,
not to provide assurance on the internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and maintaining
internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments
by management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs
of controls.  Generally, controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the
entity's objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.  Those controls include the
safeguarding of assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or fraud may occur
and not be detected.  Also, projection of any evaluation of internal control
to future periods is subject to the risk that it may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily disclose all
matters in the internal control that might be material weaknesses under
standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants.  A material weakness is a condition in which the design or
operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce to
a relatively low level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in
amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements being
audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in
the normal course of performing their assigned functions.  However, we noted
no matters involving the internal control and its operation, including
controls for safeguarding securities that we consider to be material
weaknesses as defined above as of October 31, 2000.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of management, the
Board of Trustees of the Fund, and the Securities and Exchange Commission and
is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these
specified parties.



New York, New York
December 11, 2000
Tony R. SMITH v. Staci BARBOUR and Bilal Kanawati.

No. 24P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 3, 2005.

James F. (Rik) Lovett Jr., Raleigh, for Staci Day Barbour.

Helen M. Oliver, for Tony R. Smith.

Marc Sokol, for Bilal Kanawati.

Lori Christian, for Guardian Ad Litem.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th day of January 2005 by Defendant (Staci Day Barbour) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of March 2005."
Alton B. CRAVER, Jr. v. CAMPBELL & TAYLOR.

No. 620P03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2004.

Alton B. Craver, Jr., Pro Se.

E. Fitzgerald Parnell, Charlotte, for Campbell & Taylor.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 25th day of November 2003 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2004."
Exhibit 32.1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     I, Edward F. Feighan, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer ofProCentury Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that: (1) the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2006which this certification accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Edward F. Feighan   Edward F. Feighan  Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer  May 10, 2006  
34
J. Calvin CUNNINGHAM and Lori Watson Berger v. Cynthia B. SAMS.

No. 64P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 3, 2005.

William J. O'Malley, Greensboro, for Cynthia B. Sams.

J. Calvin Cunningham, Lexington, Lori Watson Berger, for Cunningham & Berger.

*174*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 25th day of January 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of March 2005."
## United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________
No. 20

- 3655

___________________________
United States of America

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.
Derek Michael Caquelin

Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas

____________
Submitted: November 15, 2021 Filed: April 6, 2022 [Unpublished]

____________ Before COLLOTON, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circ uit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Derek Caquelin pled guilty to one count of possession of less than 50 kilograms of marijuana with intent to distribute

, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(D). The district court 1 varied upward five m onths from the United States

1 The Honorable Timothy L. Brooks , United States District Judge for the West ern District of Arkansas

.-2- Sentencing Guidelines range when sentencing Caquelin to 12 months of imprisonment followed by two years of supervised release

. Caquelin appeals his sentence, arguing the district court imposed a substantively unreasonable sent ence. We conclude the appeal is moot

. Caquelin was released from prison while this appeal was pending and his appeal challenged only the length of his now

- completed prison term , so no additional relief may be granted

. See Owen v. United States , 930 F.3d 989, 99 0 (8th Cir. 2019) (holding since the def endan t “ has been released from prison, the court cannot grant any effectual remedy ” in response to his sentencing challenge)

. If Caquelin were to prevail on the merits of his appeal, the district court would not have discretion to impose a shorter term of supervised release. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(D) ( requiring minimum of two years supervised release). In any
event, Caquelin did not dispute any aspect of his supervised release term

. See Owen
, 930 F.3d at 99 0

− 91 ( noting “an unexpired, unchallenged term of supervised release does not sustain an actual controversy ”).

For these reasons, C aquelin ’s appeal is dismissed as moot

.

______________________________
STATE v. KING.

No. COA04-826.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed April 5, 2005.

Certification Date April 25, 2005.

Appeal from Henderson, (02CRS57431).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00343-CV 

DINA KASWATAKA APPELLANT

V.

ANDRE HUEY-YOU APPELLEE 

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 2014-005048-1

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

On October 28, 2014, and November 18, 2014, we notified appellant in 

accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c) that we would dismiss this 

appeal unless the $195 filing fee was paid. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). 

Appellant has not paid the $195 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

Because appellant failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of 

appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of August 16, 2013,

2

we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

DELIVERED: December 31, 2014

 

2See Supreme Court of Tex., Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil 

Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-district 

Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 13-9127 (Aug. 16, 2013) (listing fees in courts of 

appeals).
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5019 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Tralemethrin. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 16, 2008 

Mrs. TAUSCHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Tralemethrin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TRALEMETHRIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.24.35 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended 

6 by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

9 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

10 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
**EXHIBIT32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

     In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of National Beef Packing Company, LLC (the Company)on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 24, 2007 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jay D.Nielsen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

     (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

     (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

|   |   |                                    |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
| By:    |   | /s/ Jay D. Nielsen                      |
|   |   |                                    |
|   |   | Jay D. Nielsen*Chief Financial Officer* |

Date: January 8, 2008
Sara E. PARKER v. RALEIGH BONDED MOVING SYSTEM RALEIGH BONDED WAREHOUSE.

No. 380P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2004.

Sara E. Parker, Pro Se.

William C. Smith, Jr., Raleigh, for Raleigh Bonded Warehouse.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 30th day of July 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2004."
STATE v. James Daryl WALKER.

No. 94P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 14, 2005.

Amy C. Kunstling, Assistant Attorney General, Howard S. Boney, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th day of February 2005 by Defendant for Substitution of Attorney:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 14th day of February 2005."
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-13-00506-CV

Robert G. CORONA, Christina M. Mozisek, and all occupants,

Appellants

v.

GREEN TREE SERVICING LLC,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 385145

Honorable Jason Wolff, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE MARION, AND JUSTICE BARNARD

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. It is 

ORDERED that costs of appeal are taxed against Appellants Robert G. Corona, Christina M. 

Mozisek, and all occupants.

SIGNED December 20, 2013.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice
Renado SMITH and Richard Delancy, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-361

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
STATE of North Carolina v. Berkley Eugene HAIRSTON.

No. 488P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 21, 2004.

Berkley E. Hairston, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State of NC.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Defendant on the 16th day of September 2004 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Guilford County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 21st day of September 2004."
Janet L. YOUNG v. Paul M. YOUNG.

No. 46P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 4, 2004.

William E. Loose, Asheville, for Janet Young.

Robert E. Riddle, Asheville, for Paul Young.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 30th day of January 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Coui-t in conference, this the 4th day of March 2004."