alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Tatyana E. DREVALEVA, Petitioner, v. APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN MATEO COUNTY, et al.

No. 19-6631

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and the petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
IN RE WILL OF IVEY

COA03-1030.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 17, 2004.

Certification Date September 7, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4970 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,4-Benzenedisulfonic acid, 2,2′-[(1- 

methyl-1,2-ethanediyl)bis[imino(6-fluoro-1,3,5-triazine-4,2-diyl)imino(1- 

hydroxy-3-sulfo-6,2-naphthalenediyl)azo]]bis[5-methoxy-, sodium salt. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 15, 2008 

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,4-Benzenedisulfonic 

acid, 2,2′-[(1-methyl-1,2-ethanediyl)bis[imino(6-fluoro1,3,5-triazine-4,2-diyl)imino(1-hydroxy-3-sulfo-6,2- 

naphthalenediyl)azo]]bis[5-methoxy-, sodium salt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

HR 4970 IH

1 SECTION 1. 1,4-BENZENEDISULFONIC ACID, 2,2′-[(1-METHYL2 1,2-ETHANEDIYL)BIS[IMINO(6-FLUORO-1,3,5- 

3 TRIAZINE-4,2-DIYL)IMINO(1-HYDROXY-3- 

4 SULFO-6,2-NAPHTHALENEDIYL)AZO]]BIS[5- 

5 METHOXY-, SODIUM SALT. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 1,4-Benzenedisulfonic acid, 

2,2′-[(1-methyl-1,2- 

ethanediyl)bis[imino(6- 

fluoro-1,3,5-triazine-4,2- 

diyl)imino(1-hydroxy-3-sulfo6,2- 

naphthalenediyl)azo]]bis[5- 

methoxy-, sodium salt (CAS 

No. 155522–07–9) (provided 

for in subheading 

3204.16.30) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

12 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

13 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
STATE v. Jose Felix SANTIAGO CARRILLO.

No. 267P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 3, 2005.

Richard L. Harrison, Assistant Attorney General, Clark Everett, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th day of May 2004 by Defendant to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of February 2005."
MacFARLAND v. AMERICAN NAT. CAN CO.

No. COA03-1568.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 7, 2004.

Certification Date December 28, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE v. CAMPBELL

No. COA04-322

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed May 17, 2005

Certification Date June 6, 2005

Appeal from Robeson (99CRS3306, 99CRS3066).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO SECTION 302  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of GNC Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: November 4, 2005
    
    /s/ Bruce E. BarkusBruce E. BarkusChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATIONSI, Erin E. West, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ProCentury Corporation (“ProCentury”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of ProCentury as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. ProCentury’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for ProCentury and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to ProCentury,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonableassurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accountingprinciples;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of ProCentury’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures as at the end of the period concerned by this report based on suchevaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in ProCentury’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during ProCentury’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, ProCentury’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. ProCentury’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to ProCentury’s auditors and theaudit committee of ProCentury’s board of directors: a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectProCentury’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in ProCentury’s internal control over financial reporting.   May 8, 2007   Date     /s/ Erin E. West   Signature     Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer   Title  
35
# Official Journal C 41A/24 F

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 41A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5024 February 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 41A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5024 February 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2007/C 041A/01 | Recruitment notice PE/105/S — Director (Function group AD14) — Interparliamentary Delegations And Policy Support | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Parliament

2007/C 041A/01

Recruitment notice PE/105/S — Director (Function group AD14) — Interparliamentary Delegations And Policy Support

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1451 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1451

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 14 Main Street in Brockport, New York, as the ``Staff Sergeant 
                Nicholas J. Reid Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 9, 2013

Ms. Slaughter introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 14 Main Street in Brockport, New York, as the ``Staff Sergeant 
                Nicholas J. Reid Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STAFF SERGEANT NICHOLAS J. REID POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 14 Main Street in Brockport, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Staff Sergeant Nicholas J. Reid Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Staff 
Sergeant Nicholas J. Reid Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
HomeOcean Facts

# What is the difference between weather and climate?

## Weather reflects short-term conditions of the atmosphere while climate is the average daily weather for an extended period of time at a certain location.

A storm darkens the sky at the mouth of the Russian River, north of Bodega Bay, Calif. Weather can change from minute-to-minute, hour-to-hour, day-to-day, and season-to-season. Climate, is the average of weather over time and space.

We hear about weather and climate all of the time. Most of  us check the local weather forecast to plan our days. And climate change is  certainly a “hot” topic in the news. There is, however, still a lot of  confusion over the difference between the two.

Think about it this way: Climate is what you expect, weather  is what you get.

Weather is what you see outside on any particular day. So,  for example, it may be 75° degrees and sunny or it could be 20° degrees with  heavy snow. That’s the weather.

Climate is the average of that weather. For example, you can  expect snow in the Northeast in January or for it to be hot and humid in the  Southeast in July. This is climate. The climate record also includes extreme  values such as record high temperatures or record amounts of rainfall. If  you’ve ever heard your local weather person say “today we hit a record high for  this day,” she is talking about climate records.

So when we are talking about climate change, we are talking  about changes in *long-term* averages  of daily weather. In most places, weather can change from minute-to-minute,  hour-to-hour, day-to-day, and season-to-season. Climate, however, is the  average of weather over time and space.

###### Get **Social**

###### More **Information**

          - National Weather Service
          - Climate.gov
          - Coastal Climate Adaptation Resources

**Last updated:**   01/18/24**Author:** NOAAHow to cite this article

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
Jorge PRIETO, Petitioner v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 19-6742

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5037 

To require offices of the legislative branch to meet a threshold for participation by small business concerns owned and controlled by veterans with 

service-connected disabilities in procurement contracts entered into by 

such offices, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 17, 2008 

Mr. BOOZMAN (for himself and Mr. HAYES) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To require offices of the legislative branch to meet a threshold for participation by small business concerns owned 

and controlled by veterans with service-connected disabilities in procurement contracts entered into by such offices, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Legislative Branch 

5 Recognizes the Value of Service Disabled Veteran-Owned 

6 Small Business Act of 2008’’. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5037 IH

1 SEC. 2. THRESHOLD FOR PARTICIPATION BY DISABLED 

2 VETERANS SMALL BUSINESSES IN PROCURE3 MENT BY LEGISLATIVE BRANCH OFFICES. 

4 (a) PARTICIPATION BY SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS

5 OWNED BY VETERANS WITH SERVICE-CONNECTED DIS6 ABILITIES.—Each official responsible for entering into 

7 procurement contracts for goods and services for a legisla8 tive branch office shall ensure that not less than 3 percent 

9 of the aggregate value of all contracts entered into during 

10 a fiscal year is attributable to contracts awarded to eligible 

11 disabled veterans small businesses. 

12 (b) LEGISLATIVE BRANCH OFFICE DEFINED.—In 

13 this Act, a ‘‘legislative branch office’’ means any of the 

14 following: 

15 (1) The Office of the Architect of the Capitol. 

16 (2) The Congressional Budget Office. 

17 (3) The Government Accountability Office. 

18 (4) The Government Printing Office. 

19 (5) The House of Representatives. 

20 (6) The Library of Congress. 

21 (7) The Office of Compliance. 

22 (8) The United States Capitol Police. 

23 SEC. 3. ELIGIBLE DISABLED VETERANS SMALL BUSINESS 

24 DEFINED. 

25 (a) IN GENERAL.—In this Act, an ‘‘eligible disabled 

26 veterans small business’’ is a small business concern listed 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5037 IH

1 on the database maintained by the Secretary of Veterans 

2 Affairs under section 8127(f) of title 38, United States 

3 Code, as a small business concern owned and controlled 

4 by a veteran with a service-connected disability. 

5 (b) SMALL BUSINESS CONCERN DEFINED.—In this 

6 Act, the term ‘‘small business concern’’ has the meaning 

7 given that term under section 3 of the Small Business Act 

8 (15 U.S.C. 632). 

9 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

10 This Act shall apply with respect to fiscal year 2009 

11 and each succeeding fiscal year. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4867 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4867

      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2,5-Bis[(1,3-
                 dioxobutyl)amino]benzenesulfonic acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 19, 2007

   Mr. Clay introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2,5-Bis[(1,3-
                 dioxobutyl)amino]benzenesulfonic acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2,5-BIS[(1,3-DIOXOBUTYL)AMINO]BENZENESULFONIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.39 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2020303DE.01002301.xml

| 17.9.2020 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 303/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2020

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 303/23

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie (EU) 2016/797 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 11. Mai 2016 über die Interoperabilität des Eisenbahnsystems in der Europäischen Union

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 138 vom 26. Mai 2016
  )

Auf Seite 66, Artikel 18 Absatz 6 Unterabsatz 2:

Anstatt:

„Die nationale Sicherheitsbehörde und die Agentur treffen ihre Entscheidungen innerhalb einer angemessenen, im Voraus festgelegten Frist, spätestens jedoch vier Monate nach Eingang aller erforderlichen Informationen.“

muss es heißen:

„Die nationale Sicherheitsbehörde trifft ihre Entscheidungen innerhalb einer angemessenen, im Voraus festgelegten Frist, spätestens jedoch vier Monate nach Eingang aller erforderlichen Informationen.“

---
EXHIBIT 12(a)

                       CHASE PREFERRED CAPITAL CORPORATION
                Computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges


                                         For the Year      Inception (9/18/96)
(in thousands, except ratio):           Ended 12/31/97      through 12/31/96
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Net income                                 $79,779              $22,085
                                           -------              -------
                                                             
Fixed charges:                                               
      Advisory fees                            250                   71
                                           -------              -------
                                                             
Total fixed charges                            250                   71
                                           -------              -------
                                                             
Earnings before fixed charges              $80,029              $22,156
                                           =======              =======
                                                             
Fixed charges, as above                    $   250              $    71
                                           =======              =======
                                                             
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges          320.12               312.06
                                           =======              =======
================================================================================


                                      -26-
Steven M. FISHER v. HOUSING AUTHORITY.

No. 94PA03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2004.

K. Edward Greene, Raleigh, Matthew S. Sullivan, for Housing Authority-Kinston.

Janet Ward Black, Greensboro, for Steven M. Fisher.

Bradley N. Schulz, Smithfield, for N.C. Academy of Trial Lawyers.

Clay A. Collier, Wilmington, for N.C. Assoc. of Defense Attys.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th day of June 2003 by Plaintiff to Strike Reply Brief of Appellant:

> "Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of October 2004."
Terry Lane BUCHANAN v. STATE of North Carolina.

No. 508P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 13, 2004.

Terry Buchanan, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Charles W. Hipps, District Attorney, for State of NC.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 4th day of October 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Graham County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th day of October 2004."
STATE v. WILLIAMS

No. COA03-1691.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 7, 2004.

Certification Date December 28, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. No error.