alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1535 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1535

  To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to conduct a study and 
report to Congress on gaps in port security in the United States and a 
                         plan to address them.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 12, 2013

 Ms. Hahn (for herself and Mr. Poe of Texas) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to conduct a study and 
report to Congress on gaps in port security in the United States and a 
                         plan to address them.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gauging American Port Security Act'' 
or the ``GAPS Act''.

SEC. 2. STUDY, REPORT, AND PLAN TO ADDRESS GAPS IN PORT SECURITY.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 
of this Act the Inspector General of the Department of Homeland 
Security shall--
            (1) conduct a study of, and submit to the Congress a report 
        on, remaining gaps in port security in the United States; and
            (2) include in such report a prioritization of such gaps 
        and a plan for addressing them.
    (b) Form.--The report required under subsection (a) shall be 
submitted in classified form but shall contain an unclassified annex.

SEC. 3. INFORMATION SHARING.

    The Secretary of Homeland Security shall, in accordance with rules 
for the handling of classified information, share, as appropriate, with 
designated points of contact from Federal agencies and State, local, or 
tribal governments, and port system owners and operators, relevant 
information regarding remaining gaps in port security of the United 
States, prioritization of such gaps, and a plan for addressing such 
gaps. In the event that a designated point of contact does not have the 
necessary security clearance to receive such information, the Secretary 
shall help expedite the clearance process, as appropriate.
                                 <all>
```
STATE v. Jathiyah al-BAYYINAH.

No. 550A03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 21, 2005.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Garry W. Frank, District Attorney, for State.

Janet Moore, Assistant Public Defender, Joan Cunningham, Assistant Attorney General, for Jathiyah al-Bayyinah.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th day of January 2005 by Defendant to Amend Record on Appeal:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 21st day of January 2005."
STATE v. RODRIGUEZ.

No. COA04-733.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed January 4, 2005.

Certification Date January 24, 2005.

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with thefiling of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of InfoSonicsCorporation (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2009, JosephRam, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934  (15U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: May 15, 2009 | /s/ JOSEPH RAM                     |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                    | Joseph Ram,                             |
| * *                | *Chief Executive Officer and President* |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
     I, Edward F. Feighan, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of ProCentury Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period endedSeptember 30, 2004 which this certification accompanies fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and
(2) the information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.   /s/ Edward F. Feighan    Edward F. Feighan  Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer  November 12, 2004
In the Matter of T.R.B.

No. 296A03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 7, 2004.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Laura E. Crumpler, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellant.

Marjorie S. Canaday, Blowing Rock, for respondent-appellee.

Coe W. Ramsey, Raleigh, on behalf of the American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina Legal Foundation, amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal arises from an adjudication order entered by Judge Joseph E. Setzer, Jr. and from a dispositional order entered by Judge David B. Brantley. Respondent T.R.B. was adjudicated delinquent and was sentenced to twelve months' probation under the supervision of a juvenile court counselor. The Court of Appeals held that respondent's confession was obtained in violation of N.C.G.S. § 7B-2101 and reversed and remanded the case for a new adjudication hearing. Judge Wynn wrote separately, "concurring in part, dissenting in part," with the majority's opinion. *In re T.R.B.,*157 N.C.App. 609, 623, 582 S.E.2d 279, 288 (2003).

The State, through the Attorney General, appealed to this Court pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2), and this Court granted the State's petition for discretionary review as to additional issues. We have now determined that the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed. Additionally, because Judge Wynn concurred with the Court of Appeals' majority opinion on all substantive grounds and merely raised an additional issue for consideration, the State's appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) is hereby dismissed.

APPEAL DISMISSED; DISCRETIOARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALOWED.
Independent Auditors' Consent




To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Smith Barney Aggressive Growth Fund:
We consent to the incorporation by reference, in this Prospectus
and Statement of Additional Information, of our report dated
October 15, 2000, on the statement of assets and liabilities for
the Smith Barney Aggressive Growth Fund (the "Fund") as of August
31, 2000 and the related statement of operations for the year then
ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the
years in the two-year period then ended and the financial
highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then
ended.  These financial statements and financial highlights and
our report thereon are included in the Annual Report of the Fund
as filed on Form N-30D.
We also consent to the references to our firm under the headings
"Financial Highlights" in the Prospectus and "Auditors" in the
Statement of Additional Information.



KPMG LLP
New York, New York
December 20, 2000
Page
** **

**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of InfoSonicsCorporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, each of theundersigned Joseph Ram, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and JeffreyKlausner, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigneds’ knowledgeand belief:

 

(1) theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: August 15, 2005 | /s/ Joseph Ram       |                    |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------|-------------------------|
|                        |                      | Joseph Ram              |
|                        |                      | Chief Executive Officer |
|                        |                      |                    |
|                        |                      |                    |
| Dated: August 15, 2005 | /s/ Jeffrey Klausner |                    |
|                        |                      | Jeffrey Klausner        |
|                        |                      | Chief Financial Officer |
|                             |                           |                         |  |  |

 

1

----
HomeEducationCurrents

# Tidal Currents 2

## Currents Tutorial

**Click the image**

----

Also similar to tides, tidal currents are affected by the relative  positions of the moon and Earth. When the moon and Earth are positioned  nearest to each other (perigee), the currents are stronger than average  and are called “perigean currents.” When the moon and Earth are at  their farthest distance from each other (apogee), the currents are  weaker and are called “apogean currents.”

The shape of bays and estuaries also can magnify the intensity of tides  and the currents they produce. Funnel-shaped bays in particular can  dramatically alter tidal current magnitude. The Bay of Fundy in Nova  Scotia is a classic example of this effect, and has the highest tides  in the world - over 15 meters (Thurman, H.V., 1994).

**mouse over the image**

The daily tidal currents experienced by coastal areas can also have a  dramatic effect on estuarine ecosystems. View a slide show of the  remarkable daily rise of waters at the Elkhorn Slough National  Estuarine Research Reserve in California: https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/education/tutorial_estuaries/media/supp_est01a_tide.html

### Currents Lessons

              - Welcome
              - Tidal Currents 1
              - Tidal Currents 2
              Coastal Currents
              - Waves
              - Longshore Currents
              - Rip Currents
              - Upwelling
              Surface Ocean Currents
              - The Coriolis Effect
              - Surface Ocean Currents
              - Boundary Currents
              - The Ekman Spiral
              The Global Conveyor Belt
              - Thermohaline Circulation
              - The Global Conveyor Belt
              - Effects of Climate Change
              How Are Currents Measured?
              - Age of Exploration
              - What is a "knot"?
              - Shallow Water Drifter
              - Deep Ocean Drifter
              - Current Profiler
              - Shore-based Current Meters
              - How Currents Affect Our Lives?
              - References
              - Roadmap to Resources
              - Subject Review

###### **Search** Education

###### Get **Social**

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Ammex Gold Mining Corp.  (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



3.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.









Date:  May 21, 2007



By: /s/ Christopher Crupi

-----------------

Christopher Crupi

Chief Executive Officer
Deontae Travohn DAVIS, Petitioner v. Duncan MACLAREN, Warden

No. 19-6365

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
HomeOcean Facts

# Can humans drink seawater? 

## Drinking seawater can be deadly to humans.

One of the instruments scientists can use to measure salinity is a CTD rosette, which  measures the Conductivity (salinity), Temperature, and Depth of the  water column. 

Seawater contains salt. When humans drink seawater, their cells are thus taking in water and salt. While humans can safely ingest small amounts of salt, the salt content in seawater is much higher than what can be processed by the human body. Additionally, when we consume salt as part of our daily diets, we also drink liquids, which help to dilute the salt and keep it at a healthy level. Living cells do depend on sodium chloride (salt) to maintain the body’s chemical balances and reactions; however, too much sodium can be deadly.

Human kidneys can only make urine that is less salty than salt water. Therefore, to get rid of all the excess salt taken in by drinking seawater, you have to urinate more water than you drank. Eventually, you die of dehydration even as you become thirstier.

###### **Search** Our Facts

###### Get **Social**

###### More **Information**

          -  Why is the ocean salty?

**Last updated:**   01/20/23**Author:** NOAAHow to cite this article

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10
- 14
- 00317
- CR No. 10
- 14
- 00318
- CR JESSE WAYLON WALKER , Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

From the 82nd District Court Falls County, Texas Trial Court No s . 9387 and 9408

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Jesse Waylon Walker appeals pro se from two plea

- bargained judgments of conviction. T he trial court ’s certification of defendant’s right of appeal in each case states that the defendant waived the right of appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 25.2(d) . The judgments in each case reflect a guilty plea, and in his notices of appeal, Walker admits that he pleaded guilty under a plea bargain.Walker v. State Page 2

In his notices, Walker asserts that he received ineffective assistance of counsel and that he pleaded guilty “under duress by counsel,” but those are insufficient grounds for continuing these dire ct appeals. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2( a)(2); Pena v. State, 323 S.W.3d 522, 525

- 26 (Tex. App.

— Corpus Christi 2010, no pet.); Webb v. State, 244 S.W.3d 543, 547 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, no pet.). Furthermore, sentence was imposed in each case on July 24, 2014, and his notices of appeal were filed on October 10, 2014. Walker’s notices of appeal are untimely, and we have no jurisdiction of an untimely appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.2(a)(1) (requiring the filing of notice of appeal within 30 days of sentence being imposed); Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (no appellate jurisdiction where notice of appeal is untimely). For the above reasons, these appeals are dismissed.

REX D. DAVIS Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis , and Justice Scoggins Appeals dismissed Opinion delivered and filed October 23, 2014 Do not p ublish [C RPM]Walker v. State Page 3
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 29, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 38785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13927]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Polar Programs; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the 
following meeting:
    Name and Committee Code: Advisory Committee for Polar Programs 
(#1130).
    Date and Time: July 25, 2022, 12:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m. EST.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, 
Alexandria, VA 22314 [verbar] Virtual via Zoom.
    Virtual meeting attendance: A virtual link to access the meeting 
will be posted on the AC OPP website at: https://nsf.gov/geo/opp/advisory.jsp.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Sara Eckert, Office of Polar Programs, National 
Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Ave., Alexandria, VA 22314; 
Contact: (703) <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c9fbf0fbe4fef1f0f0e6baacaaa2acbbbd89a7baafe7aea6bf">292-7899/<span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3a495f59515f484e7a54495c145d554c">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Purpose of Meeting: AC review of Antarctic Research Vessel (ARV) 
Science Advisory Subcommittee (SASC) report following the ARV's Interim 
Design Review #1.
    Agenda: Review and evaluate the SASC report, and vote on whether 
the report should be forwarded to the NSF Office of Polar Programs.

    Dated: June 24, 2022.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2022-13927 Filed 6-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection with the quarterly report of PortaltoChina.com, Inc. on Form 10-Q
for  the  quarter  ended  November  30,  2009  as  filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Caroline Rechia, Chief
Executive  Officer,  President, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer  of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1)     The  Report  fully  complies  with  the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended;  and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.



Date:  January  14,  2010               By:  /s/  Caroline  Rechia
                                             Caroline Rechia
                                             President, Chief Executive Officer,
                                             Chief Financial Officer and
                                             Principal Accounting Officer
Pedro VIGIO-APONTE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6936

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Doug Leifermann, certify that:

1.               I have reviewedthis Form 10-Q of Golden Oval Eggs, LLC;

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Based on myknowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)          Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)         Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)          Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)          Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)         Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date July 17, 2006 | /s/ Doug Leifermann     |   |
|-------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                    | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----