alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1456 

To make improvements to the Children’s Gasoline Burn Prevention Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2013 

Mr. COLE (for himself, Mr. MULLIN, Mr. LONG, and Mr. LATTA) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce 

A BILL 

To make improvements to the Children’s Gasoline Burn 

Prevention Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO THE CHILDREN’S GASOLINE 

4 BURN PREVENTION ACT. 

5 Section 2 of the Children’s Gasoline Burn Prevention 

6 Act (Public Law 110–278; 122 Stat. 2602) is amended— 

7 (1) in the heading, by striking ‘‘CHILD-RE8 SISTANT PORTABLE GASOLINE CONTAINERS’’ 

9 and inserting ‘‘PORTABLE FUEL CONTAINER

10 STANDARDS’’; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1456 IH

1 (2) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the 

2 following new subsection: 

3 ‘‘(b) REQUIREMENTS.—Effective 6 months after the 

4 date of enactment of this Act, each portable fuel container 

5 manufactured on or after that date for sale in the United 

6 States shall conform to the provisions of ASTM standards 

7 F852–08, F2517–09, F839–83 (2006), F976–08, F926– 

8 02 (2007), as they are by their terms applicable to gaso9 line, kerosene, or diesel portable fuel containers, as issued 

10 by ASTM International.’’; 

11 (3) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘gasoline’’ 

12 each place that it appears; and 

13 (4) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘child resist14 ance requirements of ASTM F2517–05’’ and insert15 ing ‘‘provisions of any standard described in sub16 section (b),’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. JOHN ANTHONY VEGA, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 483 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 17th day of December, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
Nos. 03-14-00169-CR 

EX PARTE § IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

VS. § THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

JOSE EDUARDO TORRES § TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS 

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

From the 207th District Court of Comal County, Texas 

Trial Court No. CR2013-127 

Hon. Bruce Boyer, Judge Presiding 

 In accordance with Tex. R. App. P. 49.8 and 10.5(b), the undersigned 

submits the following: 

Appellant’s request for rehearing and en banc rehearing is due to be filed on, 

May 28, 2015. Counsel has been ill the last two days and has been unable to 

complete requests for rehearing. The undersigned requests additional time to 

prepare and file Appellant’s requests for rehearing and rehearing en banc. Mr. 

Torres requests an extension of five (5) days, to and including June 2, 2015. This is 

Appellant’s second request to extend time. 

 WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant respectfully 

requests that this Court grant the requested extension. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

ACCEPTED

03-14-00169-CR

5449741

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

5/28/2015 11:35:42 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/28/2015 11:35:42 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
Robert A. Jimenez

De Mott, McChesney, Curtright & Armendariz

800 Dolorosa Street, Suite 100

San Antonio, Texas 78207

210/354-1844

210/212-2116 - fax

By: /s/ Robert A. Jimenez

SBN: 24059125
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this the 28th day of May, 2015 a copy of the 

foregoing “Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Rehearing” has been 

electronically filed with this Court, and will be served on the Comal County 

District Attorney’s Office.

 /s/ ROBERT A. JIMENEZ
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of AT&S Holdings, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard G. Honan,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.1350,
      that:





·


The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





·


The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
       May 22, 2007








//s//
      Richard G. Honan


------------------------


Richard
      G. Honan,


Chief
      Executive Officer
Carolyn Averitt LANCASTER, Charles S. Fox, individually and as Executor of the Estate of Cornelia Averitt Fox, deceased, Jane Gregg Derby, Sabra Gregg Campbell and Mary Mac Gregg Wilkinson v. MAPLE STREET HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., A Nonprofit North Carolina Corporation.

No. 206A03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 13, 2004.

Michael W. Willis, Whiteville, Kenneth R. Wooten, Hugh R. Overholt, New Bern, for Maple Street Homeowners Association, a Nonprofit North Carolina Corporation.

Ronnie M. Mitchell, Coy E. Brewer, Jr., Fayetteville, for Lancaster et al.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendants for rehearing of the decision of this Court pursuant to Rule 31, N.C. Rules of Appellate Procedure, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th day of January 2004."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              APR-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         363,169
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  617,850
<ALLOWANCES>                                   263,617
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,694,283
<PP&E>                                       3,495,711
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,184,547
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,172,342
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,470,839
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,231,532
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,172,342
<SALES>                                      2,319,631
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,319,631
<CGS>                                        1,312,284
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,535,704
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             109,549
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,367,555)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,367,555)
<DISCONTINUED>                               4,529,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.14
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**New Holland Credit Company, LLC**

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of New Holland Credit Company, LLC (“NHCC”), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2018 (as amended from time to time, the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) by and among NHCC, CNH Capital Receivables LLC and CNH Equipment Trust 2018-A, does hereby certify that:

 

1.             NHCC is Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

 

2.             The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Indenture Trustee.

 

3.             This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 4.9(a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 

4.             A review of the Servicer’s activities during the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2019 and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

5.             To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2019.

 

6.             IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 23rd day of March, 2020.

 
| March 23, 2020 |   |
|---------------------|--------|
|                |   |
|                | By:    | /s/   Carlo Alberto Sisto |
|                | Name:  | Carlo   Alberto Sisto |
|                | Title: | President |

 

----
An official website of the United States government.								Here's how you know we're official.				

##### dot gov icon**Official websites use .gov**

A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

##### https icon**Secure websites use HTTPS**

A small lock or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to a .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

National Ocean ServiceNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

              -  Home 
              -  Ocean Facts 
              -  TOPICS ****                  - Explore All Topics
                - Careers
                - Economy
                - Ecosystems
                - Geodesy
                - Hazards
                - Navigation
                - Observations
                - Ocean
                - Recreation
                - Sea Level Rise 
                - Story Maps
                - Tools 
              -  Education 
              -  News 
              -  Podcasts 
              -  Video 
              -  Images 
              -  About Us 

HomeEducationTides and Water LevelsTypes and Causes of Tidal Cycles – Diurnal, Semidiurnal, Mixed Semidiurnal; Continental Interference

<< Back

Diurnal tide cycle  (upper left). An area has a diurnal tidal cycle if it experiences one  high and one low tide every lunar day. Many areas in the Gulf of Mexico  experience these types of tides.

Semidiurnal tide cycle (upper right). An area has a semidiurnal tidal cycle if it experiences two high and two low tides of approximately equal size every lunar day. Many areas on the eastern coast of North America experience these tidal cycles.

Mixed Semidiurnal tide cycle (lower middle). An area has a mixed semidiurnal tidal cycle if it experiences two high and two low tides of different size every lunar day. Many areas on the western coast of North America experience these tidal cycles.

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8390

FELIX ORIAKHI, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:08-cv-00893-PJM; 1:90-cr-00072-PJM-12)

Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 24, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Felix Oriakhi, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Felix Oriakhi seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his “Petition for Writ of Audita Querela” as a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000), and denying it for

failure to first obtain authorization from this court to file a successive § 2255 motion. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(2), 2255 (2006). He also seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El

v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Oriakhi has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny Oriakhi’s motion to consolidate, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

23 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Order entered January 27, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-01275-CR

RAMON MARTINEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F16-53661-H

ORDER

The clerk’s record was filed December 12, 2016. Missing from the clerk’s record is the 

trial court’s certification of appellant’s right to appeal. We ORDER the Dallas County District 

Clerk to file, within TEN DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental clerk’s record 

containing the trial court’s rule 25.2 certification of appellant’s right to appeal.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
VIA EDGAR 
 
 
 
April 3, 1997 
 
 
Securities and Exchange Commission 
450 Fifth Street, N.W. 
Washington, D.C. 20549 
 
RE:	Smith Barney Massachusetts Municipals Fund 
	File Nos. 33-11417 
		   811-4994 
 
Dear Sirs: 
 
 
Pursuant to Rule 497(j) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, please 
accept this letter as certification that the Prospectus and Statement of 
Additional Information for the above-referenced fund (the "Fund") does not 
differ from that contained in Post-Effective Amendment No. 17 to the Fund's 
Registration Statement on Form N-1A, which was filed electronically on March 
24, 1997.     
   
 
Please return an electronic transmittal as evidence of your receipt of this  
filing. 
 
Very truly yours, 
 
/s/ Daria J. Szczur 
 
Daria J. Szczur 
 
Enclosures
Richard Leland NEAL, Petitioner, v. B. Marc NEAL, et al.

No. 18-1560

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
|                               |  |                           |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|-------------------------------|--|---------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|
| Subsidiary                    |  | Jurisdiction of Formation |
|                               |  |                           |
| Centerline Trucking, LLC      |  | Delaware                  |
| KLX Directional Drilling, LLC |  | Delaware                  |
| KLX Energy Services Inc.      |  | Delaware                  |
| KLX Energy Services LLC       |  | Delaware                  |
| Krypton Holdco, LLC           |  | Delaware                  |
| Krypton Intermediate, LLC     |  | Delaware                  |
SMITH BARNEY MASSACHUSETTS MUNICIPALS FUND
                              
                  Supplement to Prospectus
                   dated January 29, 1995
                              
     Beginning on July 1, 1995, Smith Barney Massachusetts
Municipals Fund (the "Fund") began declaring dividends from
its net investment income daily. Dividends will ordinarily
be paid by the Fund on the last Friday of each month, to
shareholders of record as of the preceding Tuesday.


Supplement dated January 12, 1995

FD01072 1/96
STATE v. SAUNDERS.

No. COA03-1437.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed January 4, 2005.

Certification Date January 24, 2005.

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed; remanded for correction of order.
10f-3 REPORT

  			Travelers High Yield Bond Trust

			July 1, 2002 through December 31, 2002


                         Trade                                         % of
Issuer                   Date     Selling Dealer    Amount     Price   Issue(1)

TFM S.A. de C.V.         6/6/02   J.P. Morgan       $150,000   $98.61   0.08%
 12.500% due 6/15/12

Stone Container          6/19/02  Deutsche Bank      250,000   100.00   0.06
 8.375% due 7/1/12

Buffets Inc.	         6/21/02  CS First Boston    250,000    96.18   0.11
 11.250% due 7/15/10

Jefferson Smurfit Corp.  9/10/02  Morgan Stanley     175,000   100.00   0.04(A)
 8.250% due 10/1/12

FMC Corp.		 10/9/02  Bank of America    175,000    98.77   0.05
 10.250% due 11/1/09

Cummins Inc.		 11/15/02 J.P. Morgan	      25,000   100.00   0.01
 9.500% due 12/1/10

R.H. Donnelley Fin Corp. 11/26/02 Bear Stearns & Co.  25,000   100.00   0.01
 8.875% due 12/15/10



(1)  Represents purchases by all affiliated funds; may not exceed
       25% of the principal amount of the offering.

 A - Includes purchsase of $125,000 by other affiliated mutual funds.
STATE of North Carolina v. Willard James HOLBROOKS, Sr.

No. 656P03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 6, 2004.

David Childers, Mount Holly, for Holbrook.

Sylvia Thibaut, Special Deputy Attorney General, Mark Speas, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd day of December 2003 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of May 2004."
1 The Honorable Charles R. Wolle, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 02-1960

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Southern Jennifer Regenos, * District of Iowa. * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: December 20, 2002 Filed: December 27, 2002

___________ Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Jennifer Regenos pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute and possess with intent to distribute more than 50 grams of methamphetamine and more than 500 grams of a substance containing methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), and 846. The district court 1 sentenced her to 240 months of imprisonment and 10 years of supervised release, as that was the statutory minimum sentence given her prior felony drug conviction. On appeal, counsel has-2- moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the sentence amounts to cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment. This argument is unavailing. Section 841 and its mandatory minimum sentencing provisions have consistently withstood constitutional scrutiny. See, e.g. , United States v. Mendoza , 121 F.3d 441, 442-43 (8th Cir. 1997) (20-year mandatory minimum sentence for distribution of 1 pound of methamphetamine after prior drug conviction was constitutional); United States v. Prior , 107 F.3d 654, 659-60 (8th Cir.) (life sentence without parole for possessing with intent to distribute 1,147.6 grams of methamphetamine after 3 prior drug convictions did not violate Eighth Amendment), cert. denied , 522 U.S. 824 (1997); see also Harmelin v. Michigan , 501 U.S. 957, 1001-02 (1991) (Kennedy, J., concurring in part and concurring in the judgment) (Eighth Amendment forbids only sentences grossly disproportionate to crime; life sentence without parole for first offense of possession of less than 1 kilogram of cocaine was not cruel and unusual punishment). Following our independent review, seePenson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the
undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General
Partners of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                           
|---------------------------
|/S/     LEO F. WELLS, III  
|Leo F. Wells, III          
|Principal Executive Officer
|March 27, 2007             



|                           
|---------------------------
|/S/     DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS
|Douglas P. Williams        
|Principal Financial Officer
|March 27, 2007
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4968 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Tetraacetylethylenediamine. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 15, 2008 

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 

Tetraacetylethylenediamine. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TETRAACETYLETHYLENEDIAMINE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.29.70 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Tetraacetylethylenediamine) is amended by striking ‘‘12/ 

7 31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4968 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS