alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 23
- 00528
- CR NO. 03
- 23
- 00529
- CR

The State of Texas , Appellant

v. Truman McCollum , Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF BELL COUNTY NO. MR2C2101190 , THE HONORABLE REBECCA DEPEW , JUDG E PRESIDING

O R D E R A N D M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
PER CURIAM In the above appeals filed by the State of Texas , challenging the trial court ’ s order granting appellee Truman McCollum’s pretrial motion to suppress evidence , counsel for
Mc Collum has filed a suggestion of death, representing that they “ have been informed by a family member that Mr. McCollum has died during the pendency of this State’s appeal ” and that they are in the process of obtaining a death certificate to provide verifi cation of this to the Court so that this appeal may be dismissed. ” Counsel “ respectfully request a 60

- day abatement to obtain a copy of the death certificate , ” and they advise that “ [ o ] nce proof of death is filed with this Court, th [ ese] appeal [s] should be dismissed. ”

“ Under Tex. R. App. P. 7.1(a)(2), if an appe llant in a criminal case dies after an appeal is perfected but before the appellate court issues the mandate, the appeal will be permanently abated. ” State v. McCaffrey , 76 S.W.3d 392, 392 (Tex . Crim. App. 2002)2 (emphasis added)

. “ But when the State is the party appealing, ” and “ a defendant dies during the pendency of a State ’ s appeal, all issues become moot ” and th e appeal should be dismissed. Id . at 393 ; see also State v. Uhrich , No. 03

- 19

- 0 0909

- CR , 2020 WL 6265521 , at *1 (Tex. App.

— Austin Oct. 23, 2020, no pet.) (mem. op. , not designated for publication)

. Accordingly, w e abate th ese appea l s so that counsel for McCollum may obtain proof of McCollum ’ s death

. Counsel is instructed to file pr oof of death with this Court no later than 60 days from today’s date

. After this Court receives proof of death, we will reinstate these appeals and then dismiss the m as mo ot. If counsel is unable to obtain proof of death within 60 days , counsel is instru cted to fi le a status report with this Court explaining the delay. It is so order ed Decembe r 22, 2023

.

Before Justices Baker , Tr iana, and Smith Abated Filed: December 22, 2023
Do No t Publish
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4797 

To extend the suspension of duty on mixtures of cyhalothrin and application 

adjuvants. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 18, 2007 

Mr. COBLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on mixtures of cyhalothrin 

and application adjuvants. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF CYHALOTHRIN AND APPLICA4 TION ADJUVANTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.09 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 mixtures of cyhalothrin and application adjuvants) is 

8 amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and by inserting ‘‘12/ 

9 31/2011’’. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4797 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATIONS I, Edward F. Feighan, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this amendment no. 1 to the quarterly report on Form
10-Q/A of ProCentury Corporation (ProCentury);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of ProCentury as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    ProCenturys other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for ProCentury
and have:  a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures or
caused such disclosure controls to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
ProCentury, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of ProCenturys disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures as at the end of the period concerned by this report
based on such evaluation;c)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in ProCenturys
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
ProCenturys most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
ProCenturys internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    ProCenturys other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to ProCenturys auditors and the audit committee of ProCenturys board
of directors:  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
ProCenturys ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in
ProCenturys internal control over financial reporting. August 18, 2004   /s/ Edward F. Feighan   Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
CONSULTING GROUP CAPITAL MARKETS FUNDS (the "Trust")
Supplement dated November 12, 1997 to the Prospectus dated December 31, 
1996

	On November 3, 1997 the Trust's Board of Trustees approved the 
following:

  The hiring of Montgomery Asset Management, LLC ("Montgomery") as an 
additional investment adviser to Small Capitalization Growth 
Investments ("Small Cap Growth  Portfolio").  The Consulting Group, a 
division of Smith Barney Mutual Funds Management Inc. ("SBMFM"), the 
Trust's Investment Manager, recommended the hiring of an additional 
active manager due to the rapid growth in assets experienced by the 
Small Cap Growth Portfolio in 1997.  The hiring of Montgomery 
resulted in the entering into of an investment advisory agreement 
dated as of November 7, 1997, between SBMFM and Montgomery.  Under 
the terms of the agreement, Montgomery will be receiving 0.50% for 
its services, a fee that is computed daily and paid monthly based on 
the value of the average net assets of the Small Cap Growth Portfolio 
allocated to Montgomery.  Montgomery, located in San Francisco, 
California, is a subsidiary of Commerzbank AG.  Montgomery was 
founded in 1990 and currently manages $8.9 billion in assets.  
Shareholders of  the Small Cap Growth Portfolio will soon receive an 
information statement regarding Montgomery.

  An amendment to the Trust's investment policies to permit each 
Portfolio to invest in Real Estate Investment Trusts ("REITS"). REITs 
are entities which either own properties or make construction or 
mortgage loans.  Equity trusts own real estate directly and the value 
of, and income earned by, the trust depends upon the income of the 
underlying properties and the rental income they earn.  Equity trusts 
may also include operating or finance companies.  Equity trusts can 
also realize capital gains by selling properties that have 
appreciated in value.  A mortgage trust can make construction, 
development or long-term mortgage loans, and are sensitive to the 
credit quality of the borrower.  Mortgage trusts derive their income 
from interest payments.  Hybrid trusts combine the characteristics of 
both equity and mortgage trusts, generally by holding both ownership 
interests and mortgage interests in real estate.  The value of 
securities issued by REITs are affected by tax and regulatory 
requirements and by perceptions of management skill.  They are also 
subject to heavy cash flow dependency, defaults by borrowers or 
tenants, self-liquidation, the possibility of failing to qualify for 
tax-free status under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, 
and failing to maintain exemption from the Investment Company Act 
1940, as amended.


FD  01357  11/97
STATE of North Carolina v. Steven Edgar SPENCER.

No. 325P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 12, 2004.

Haakon Thorsen, Charlotte, Bruce T. Cunningham, Southern Pines, for Steven Edgar Spencer.

J. Philip Allen, Assistant Deputy Attorney General, Jeff Hunt, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Bruce T. Cunningham, Attorney, on the 2nd day of July 2004 in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th day of August 2004."
Garrett Dean DOOR, Sr., Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6448

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA)

Essential Fish Habitat (EFH)

The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA) regulates marine fisheries 

management in U.S. federal waters and establishes procedures designed to identify, conserve, and enhance 

Essential Fish Habitat (EFH). EFH refers to all waters and substrate necessary for fish for spawning, breeding, 

feeding, or growth to maturity. The MSA authorizes the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to manage 

marine fisheries in federal waters and to facilitate the conservation and restoration of EFH.

 NOS Consultation Under MSA Section 305 (B)

MSA Section 305(b) requires federal agencies to consult with the NMFS Office of Habitat Conservation (OHC) 

on all federal actions that may adversely affect EFH. Adverse effects may result from actions occurring within or 

outside of EFH and include any actions that reduce the quality and/or quantity of EFH. If adverse effects are 

anticipated, NMFS OHC will recommend measures to avoid, minimize, or offset adverse impacts to the quality 

or quantity of EFH.

To initiate consultation under Section 305(b) for NOS surveying and mapping projects, NOS prepared and 

submitted an EFH Assessment to NMFS on June 2, 2022. The EFH Assessment evaluated potential adverse 

effects to EFH from proposed NOS surveying and mapping projects and included a summary of required and 

optional mitigation measures to minimize impacts to sensitive species and habitats. On November 1, 2022, 

NMFS OHC provided EFH conservation recommendations which NOS agreed to implement in a response on 

January 5, 2023.

Outcomes: Through this consultation process, NOS developed additional mitigation measures aimed to 

minimize impacts to EFH from NOS project activities. The NOS mitigation measures will be implemented on 

each project as appropriate.

Photo Credit (left to right): NOS Image Gallery; Kelvin Gorospe, PIFSC NMFS; and Oceanography Team, PIFSC NMFS
EXHIBIT 32







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Premier Alliance Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Larry W. Brumfield, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Premier Alliance Group, Inc., and will be retained by Premier Alliance Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








/s/ Larry W. Brumfield


Larry W. Brumfield


Chief Financial Officer


January 19, 2012
STATE v. PRATT.

No. COA03-1397.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 6, 2004.

Certification Date July 26, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Lee, Slip Opinion No. 2017-Ohio-7826.]

NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of De cisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published.

S LIP O PINION N O . 2017-O HIO -7826
T HE S TATE OF O HIO , A PPELLEE , v . L EE , A PPELLANT . [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Lee, Slip Opinion No. 2017-Ohio-7826.] Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of State v. Aalim. (No. 2016-0315

― Submitted April 4, 2017

― Decided September 27, 2017.)
A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 14AP-1009, 2016-Ohio-122.

_________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeal s is affirmed on the authority of State v. Aalim , ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2017-Ohio-2956, __ N.E.3d ___.
O’C ONNOR , C.J., and O’D ONNELL , K ENNEDY , F RENCH , F ISCHER , and
D E W INE , JJ., concur. O’N EILL , J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in State v. Aalim , ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2017-Ohio-2956, __ N.E.3d ___, would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals pursuant to State v. Aalim , ___ Ohio St.3d ___,S UPREME C OURT OF O HIO

2 2016-Ohio-8278, __ N.E.3d ___, and would remand the cause to the juvenile court for an amenability determination consistent with R.C. 2152.12(B).

_________________ Ron O’Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Valerie B. Swanson, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender , and Sheryl Trzaska and Brooke M. Burns, Assistant Public Defenders, for appellant.

_________________
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                    |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/    C. LARRYPOPE         |
|   | C. Larry PopePresident and Chief Executive Officer                                      |
|   |                                                                                    |
|   | Date: December 11, 2009                                                                 |
Exhibit
      32




**SECTION
      906 CERTIFICATION**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of First Metroplex Capital,
      Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each
      of the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




FIRST
                METROPLEX CAPITAL, INC.Dated:
                August 14, 2006
            By:/s/
                Patrick G. AdamsPatrick
                G. AdamsChief
                Executive OfficerDated:
                August 14, 2006
            By:/s/
                Sue HiggsSue
                HiggsChief
                Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
      otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
      electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
      provided to First Metroplex Capital, Inc. and will be retained by First
      Metroplex Capital, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Premier Alliance Group, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), Mark S. Elliott, Acting Chief Executive and
Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Premier Alliance Group, Inc., and will be retained by Premier
Alliance Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.


/s/ Mark S. Elliott
-------------------------------
Mark S. Elliott
Acting Chief Executive and Financial Officer
November 13, 2006
- Home
- Facts
- What is marine snow?

# **What is marine snow?**

## Marine snow is a shower of **organic material** falling from upper waters to the deep ocean.

VIDEO: Biological debris that falls from higher in the water column is also known as marine snow. Some flakes fall for weeks before finally reaching the ocean floor. 

As plants and animals near the surface of the ocean die and decay, they fall toward the seafloor, just like leaves and decaying material fall onto a forest floor. In addition to dead animals and plants, marine snow also includes fecal matter, sand, soot, and other inorganic dust.

The decaying material is referred to as “marine snow” because it looks a little bit like white fluffy bits.  The “snowflakes” grow as they fall, some reaching several centimeters in diameter. Some flakes fall for weeks before finally reaching the ocean floor.

This continuous rain of marine snow provides food for many deep-sea creatures. Many animals in the dark parts of the ocean filter marine snow from the water or scavenge it from the seabed.  NOAA scientists and others have measured the amount of useable material in marine snow and found that there is plenty of carbon and nitrogen to feed many of the scavengers in the deep sea.

The small percentage of material not consumed in shallower waters becomes incorporated into the muddy “ooze” blanketing the ocean floor, where it is further decomposed through biological activity.  About three-quarters of the deep ocean floor is covered in this thick, smooth ooze.  The ooze collects as much as six meters every million years.

##### More **Information**

 NOAA Ocean Explorer 

##### **Last updated:**

######  						 11/05/20 					

**Author:** NOAA

How to cite this article

Contact Us

##### 					Feedback

              -  Provide Feedback 
              -  Contact Us
              -  Report an error

##### 					Social

              - 
              - 
              - 
*Science. Service.Stewardship.*
							About NOS						- About Us
- NOS Program Offices
- Media Inquiries
- Website Acknowledgements
- Site Index
- Disclaimer
							More Resources						- Freedom of Information Act
- Accessibility
- Information Quality
- Privacy Policy
- NOS For Employees
- USA.gov
-  Department of Commerce
-  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
-  National Ocean Service
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS




The undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of UTG Communications International,
Inc., does hereby certify that UTG's annual report for the year ended March 31,
2001 on Form 10-KSB which contains audited financial statements for the year
ending March 31, 2001, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or
78o(d)) and that information contained in this report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of UTG
Communications International, Inc.



___________________
Ueli Ernst, President
UTG Communications International, Inc.
Sandy R. TOWNS, Employee, v. EPES TRANSPORTATION, Employer, Self Insured. Kemper Risk Management Servicing Agent.

No. 202P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 24, 2004.

Steven P. Weaver, Joseph F. Brotherton, for Epes Transport and Kemper Risk Mgt.

Charles O. Peed, Winston-Salem, for Sandy R. Towns.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 4th day of May 2004 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."