alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6506

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHARLES RICHARD MOORE, JR., a/k/a Charles R. Moore, Jr.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Greenville. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (4:12-cr-00032-F-1; 4:15-cv-00035-F)

Submitted: October 31, 2019 Decided: November 25, 2019

Before KING, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eugene Ernest Lester, III, SHARPLESS MCCLEARN LESTER DUFFY, PA, Greensboro, 

North Carolina, for Appellant. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles Richard Moore, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief 

on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The district court’s order is not appealable unless 

a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) 

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the 

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court 

denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims 

is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional 

right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Moore has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal.*

 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

 * After filing this appeal, Moore requested and was granted this court’s authorization 

to file a successive § 2255 motion challenging his firearms conviction under Johnson v. 

United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), an issue counsel also sought to raise in this appeal. 

Moore’s successive motion remains pending in the district court and, thus, we express no 

opinion as to the merits of Moore’s Johnson claim, which should be resolved in the first 

instance by the district court.
3

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
James Arthur JOHNSON v. Wayne GAY, Sheriff of Wilson County, North Carolina.

No. 641P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 5, 2005.

Johnny S. Gaskins, Raleigh, for James Arthur Johnson.

Bill Wolfe, Assistant District Attorney, for Wayne Gay.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Petitioner on the 28th day of December 2004 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, *555the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Wilson County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of January 2005."
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-13-00888-CV

SPECIALTY SELECT CARE CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO, LLC 

d/b/a Casa Rio Healthcare and Rehabilitation,

Appellant

v.

Jose FLORES, as Next Friend of Julie Flores,

Appellee

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-04577

Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the order of the trial court is 

REVERSED, and judgment is RENDERED granting the appellant’s motion to compel arbitration. 

The cause is REMANDED to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with our opinion. 

It is ORDERED that appellant Specialty Select Care Center of San Antonio d/b/a Casa Rio 

Healthcare and Rehabilitation recover its costs of this appeal from appellee Jose Flores as Next 

Friend of Julie Flores.

SIGNED September 2, 2015.

_____________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
Randall Lee CONRAD v. STATE of North Carolina.

No. 355P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 23, 2004.

Randall Lee Conrad, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Plaintiff on the 16th day of July 2004 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Stokes County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of July 2004."
William P. BARR, Attorney General, et al., Petitioners, v. AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF POLITICAL CONSULTANTS, INC., et al.

No. 19-631

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 10, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit granted.
STATE v. REHM.

No. COA03-370.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 20, 2004.

Certification Date August 9, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE of North Carolina v. Rudolph Jerome WILLIAMS.

No. 32P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 6, 2004.

Andrew G. Schopler, Chapel Hill, for Williams.

Clementine E. Peterson, Assistant Attorney General, William David McFadyen, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th day of January 2004 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of May 2004."
NC FARM PARTNERSHIP v. PIG IMPROVEMENT.

No. 156P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 24, 2004.

Jack Cozort, John J. Butler, Raleigh, Charles T. Patterson, Margaret M. Prahl, Sioux City, IA, for Pig Improvement Co., Inc.

Ronald H. Garber, John T. Benjamin, Jr., Raleigh, for NC Farm Partnership et al.

William G. Hancock, K. Matthew Vaughn, Raleigh, for NC Biosciences Organization, Embrex, Inc.

Johnny M. Loper, Rachel Krevans, San Francisco, for ViaGen, Inc.

John J. Butler, Raleigh, Rachel G. Lattimore, Washington, DC, for Biotechnology Industry Org.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd day of April 2004 by Hubbard LLC for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

> "Motion Dismissed as moot. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 24th day of June 2004."
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, John M. Sharpe, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the
Board of Directors and Treasurer of INNER SYSTEMS, INC. (the “Company”), DOES
HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.  The
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010
(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 13th
day of May, 2010.





/s/ John M. Sharpe,
      Jr.John M. Sharpe, Jr.Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
INNER SYSTEMS, INC. and will be retained by INNER SYSTEMS, INC. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of CENTERGISTIC SOLUTIONS,
INC. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Ricardo G. Brutocao, President of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. June 10, 2004 By:
    
    /s/ Ricardo G. BrutocaoRicardo G. BrutocaoPresident
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of CENTERGISTIC SOLUTIONS,
INC. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, David M. Cunningham, Chief Operating
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. June 10, 2004 By:
    
    /s/ David M. CunninghamDavid M. CunninghamChief Operating Officer and Chief FinancialOfficer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906,
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1504 

To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 

to add Rhode Island to the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 11, 2013 

Mr. LANGEVIN (for himself and Mr. CICILLINE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and 

Management Act to add Rhode Island to the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rhode Island Fisher5 men’s Fairness Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress makes the following findings: 

8 (1) Rhode Island fishermen participate in fish9 eries managed by the New England Fishery Man10 agement Council (hereinafter referred to as the 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1504 IH

1 ‘‘NEFMC’’) and the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Manage2 ment Council (hereinafter referred to as the 

3 ‘‘MAFMC’’). 

4 (2) Rhode Island currently has voting member5 ship on the NEFMC under the Magnuson-Stevens 

6 Fishery Conservation and Management Act but does 

7 not have voting membership on the MAFMC. 

8 (3) Rhode Island lands more MAFMC-managed 

9 stocks than any other MAFMC member except the 

10 State of New Jersey. 

11 (4) A higher percentage of Rhode Island’s com12 mercial landings (by weight or value) traditionally 

13 have come from species that are managed by the 

14 MAFMC as compared to species managed by 

15 NEFMC. 

16 (5) MAFMC has found that Rhode Island’s cir17 cumstance parallels that of Florida and North Caro18 lina, which each have voting membership on two dif19 ferent fishery management councils. 

20 SEC. 3. ADDITION OF RHODE ISLAND TO THE MID-ATLAN21 TIC FISHERY MANAGEMENT COUNCIL. 

22 Section 302(a)(1)(B) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fish23 ery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 

24 1852(a)(1)(B)) is amended— 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 1504 IH

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘Rhode Island,’’ after ‘‘States 

2 of’’; 

3 (2) by inserting ‘‘Rhode Island,’’ after ‘‘except 

4 North Carolina,’’; 

5 (3) by striking ‘‘21’’ and inserting ‘‘23’’; and 

6 (4) by striking ‘‘13’’ and inserting ‘‘14’’. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Glenn Mattes, certify that:

| | (1) | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of TFF Pharmaceuticals,
Inc.; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     | TFF PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
|-------------------- | -------------------------
|                     |                          
|Date: April 29, 2020 | By:                      
|                     |
In the Matter of T.D.P.

No. 310A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 8, 2004.

Katharine Chester, for Derrick Poke.

John Campbell, Fayetteville, for Cumberland Co. DSS.

Robin Weaver-Hurmence, Fayetteville, for Guardian ad Litem.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th day of November 2004 by Other for Extension of Time to File Brief:

> "Motion Allowed. Guardian ad Litem shall have up to and including the 16th day of November 2004 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 8th day of November 2004."
KENNETH ENGLISH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-1033

_____________________________/

Opinion filed June 2, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Columbia County.

Wesley R. Douglas, Judge.

Kenneth English, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., WOLF and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
Order entered October 3, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01014-CR

KIELLE DROMONE MCNEAL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-1500409-L

ORDER

We GRANT appellee’s September 30, 2016 “Second Motion to Extend Time for Filing 

State’s Brief.” We ORDER the brief tendered to this Court by appellee on September 30, 2016 

timely filed as of the date of this order. 

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code), the undersigned officer of SkyePharma PLC, a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") of the Company fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: June 27, 2005 |  | Michael Ashton
Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) as an exhibit to the Report.

---



QuickLinks
CSP questions for discussion:

1) How do we know what changes in the environment are due to climate change versus 

another cause?

2) What types of observations or measurements can we make in order to see CC in action?

3) How could local people observe these changes? How would they respond/adapt to them?

4) How are you responding to climate change (emotionally, intellectually); what are your hopes 

for the future?
Charles ROCHESTER, Petitioner v. The FORTUNE SOCIETY

No. 19-5725

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

The petition for rehearing is denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 121 (Friday, June 24, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37893-37894]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13456]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, First-Class 
Package Service, and Parcel Select Service Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: June 24, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

[[Page 37894]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
June 14, 2022, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, First-Class 
Package Service, and Parcel Select Service Contract 11 to Competitive 
Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. 
MC2022-68, CP2022-74.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2022-13456 Filed 6-23-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of Trend
Innovations Holding Corp (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2023 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Vitalis Racius, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









|Date: June 30, 2023 | /s/ Vitalis Racius                                             
|------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|                    | Vitalis Racius,                                                
|                    | Treasurer, Director, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
# Official Journal C 399/17 O

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 399 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6517 October 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 399

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6517 October 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 399/01 | Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the Court of Auditors – Consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2021 | 1 |
| 2022/C 399/02 | The ECA’s Statement of Assurance provided to the European Parliament and the Council – independent auditor’s report | 240 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 399/01

Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the Court of Auditors – Consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2021

1

2022/C 399/02

The ECA’s Statement of Assurance provided to the European Parliament and the Council – independent auditor’s report

240

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from UTG
Communications International Inc. and Subsidiaries for the year ended March 31,
1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         388198
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1561031
<ALLOWANCES>                                   75925
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2040812
<PP&E>                                         2020214
<DEPRECIATION>                                 401898
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3698632
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3353961
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       132
<OTHER-SE>                                     330407
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3698632
<SALES>                                        1743377
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1143377
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3874239
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             37688
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6712669)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6712669)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6712669)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.64)
        


</TABLE>