alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
yw f'U<V 0& 6fa\-(V*u*ep^ ftt-V^^ CeO<mcK LfvftS RECEIVED „„ -(NO i r> n -? U09 COURTOFCRIMINAL APPEALS b^ &W £ftL ^tA Vnt 1W ^Ald aL CtsVfSxcT C£>uA"T AbelAcosia.Cleri. •iLO.13 4a*b 6aps tV • e^^Mrri"Ta&Le b£ C<*>1k*Ts p^ ^6d

9x\ftYk^ vV , vv , %VV* > N S V ^ VVSIV »

t 13

^WUsT J QlaTUc^xTxES Qpffc vW. 

### W. S-T^s^ W. O*. S^ ,MSfc (lex. Qs. P$. 111$ 11 sTftTuT^s*. ?a1e ^. 

### ^HftS^^ftLCeAtf Sec.~Wafc.64x xvx x. xx » • . mIO
t^i~i. Vtffe vJfi.u

^.VWE .?,'cftPxAxice s



### ^u'ftisV W Ri>W.i"U Q 1&CAS Rules rf^WW£-?WU»xft%.IWt-^*<«fe <«*ftl9«&<?«*A% Cartel'. CAbui 0. 1^-VftLL n fcntftsTLAd.vS'TReelx^iil-te.^ ^bcsxwvxIe". C<k~ft TJa-aauW 

## /(x\lflLS"TftTEbC6a»4'=,£V. ^u . n
. J2b.\ I nbLVEp iWh»^.! (fl^ <7AV Woo ^cs^ik; Clo^ 103- 7919
?PtS3iMiU (TV'S Til- 44TM ^EleW^f. fte") "13.^-7^6

### M>i^*W"~Su<^M6^ WiUfoi .*.£***- £a<vibto- •3.P weST<\tavx.fc.KfT tJ TWe Case.,.



### WR eMwfT vJfcS \vxA\ckA UCft^t vWb>«- 7>lWxoftk Wxt *?&*&* sS 

### \$M, f\\W^ Vk VlMt- &ccia(M&2 c^ CW^s. Vix a<M~V« xo fWkt&ti

io.|h^ \t,»oi4 4 W Cau^ x£i<^. 1?^ 4& A -3v*f.ffr- -Su*.? 

### £m^A ^t\\m\^'M^\\i ten i^aluA^ cVxeR^tei^ 

# J W^VA <W*W U*^* xA^oC^W^
Q>.h%
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4824 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4824

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 3-(Ethylsulfonyl)-2-
                          pyridinesulfonamide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 18, 2007

  Mr. LaHood introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 3-(Ethylsulfonyl)-2-
                          pyridinesulfonamide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 3-(ETHYLSULFONYL)-2-PYRIDINESULFONAMIDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.33.63 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 3-(Ethylsulfonyl)-2-
pyridinesulfonamide) is amended by striking the date in the effective 
period column and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7541

NATHANIEL GLENN, JR.,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

LEROY CARTLEDGE,

Respondent – Appellee,

and

HENRY MCMASTER,

Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Greenville. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. 

(6:09-cv-02157-TLW)

Submitted: April 21, 2011 Decided: April 26, 2011

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathaniel Glenn, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. James Anthony Mabry, 

Assistant Attorney General, Donald John Zelenka, Deputy 

Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Nathaniel Glenn, Jr., seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)

petition. The district court referred this case to a magistrate 

judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(B) (West 2006 & Supp. 

2010). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied 

and advised Glenn that failure to file timely objections to this 

recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court 

order based upon the recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a 

magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve 

appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when 

the parties have been warned of the consequences of 

noncompliance. Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th 

Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Glenn

has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after 

receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of 

appealability and dismiss the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
				Here's how you know we're official. **Official websites use .gov** A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure websites use HTTPS** A small lock or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to a .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Toggle navigation Toggle search National Ocean Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
 Search
					Search National Ocean Service


Home
				Ocean Facts

				Topics
					Explore All Topics 
                        Arctic 
                        Careers 
                        Economy 
                        Ecosystems 
                        Geodesy 
                        Hazards 
                        International
                        Navigation 
                        Observations 
                        Ocean 
                        Recreation 
                         Sea Level Rise 
                        Story Maps 
                        Tools
                
                			Education

				
				News
				Podcasts
				Video
				Images
				About Us


1. Home
2. Facts
3. What is a King Tide?

**What is a King Tide?**  A King Tide is a popular, non-scientific term people often use to describe **exceptionally high tides**. a king tideA king tide viewed from south of Pier 96 in San Francisco, California, in February, 2016. Credit: Dave Rauenbuehler A King Tide is a non-scientific term people often use to describe exceptionally high tides. Tides are long-period waves that roll around the planet as the ocean is "pulled" back and forth by the gravitational pull of the moon and the sun as these bodies interact with the Earth in their monthly and yearly orbits. Higher than normal tides typically occur during a new or full moon and when the Moon is at its perigee, or during specific seasons around the country. Spring and Neap Tides Perigean Spring Tide NOAA Monthly High Tide Flooding Outlook NOAA tides and currents data
 More **Information** Tide Predictions Tide Station Index Sea Level Trends Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services   **Search** Our facts    Get **Social** Social
  **Last updated:** 06/01/23 **Author:** NOAA How to cite this article Contact Us


Feedback Provide Feedback
							Contact Us
							Report an error
 Social Instagram Logo/a>


*Science. Service.Stewardship.*
 About NOS About Us
							NOS Program Offices
							Media Inquiries
							Website Acknowledgements
                            Site Index
							Disclaimer
 More Resources Freedom of Information Act
							Accessibility
							Information Quality
							Privacy Policy
							NOS For Employees
							USA.gov
 Department of Commerce
									National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
									National Ocean Service
STATE v. BYRD

No. COA03-1468

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed February 15, 2005

Certification Date March 7, 2005

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
HomeOcean Facts

# Why does the ocean get colder at depth? 

## Cold, salty water sinks to the bottom of the ocean.

The great ocean conveyor moves water around the globe. Cold, salty water is dense and sinks to the bottom of the ocean while warm water is less dense and remains on the surface.

Cold water has a higher density than warm water.  Water gets colder with depth because cold, salty ocean water sinks to the bottom of the ocean basins below the less dense warmer water near the surface. The sinking and transport of cold, salty water at depth combined with the wind-driven flow of warm water at the surface creates a complex pattern of ocean circulation called the 'global conveyor belt.'

In contrast, the Earth gets hotter and hotter at depth primarily because the  energy of radioactive decay is leaking  outwards from the core of the planet. While this geothermal energy is transferred to ocean water along the  seafloor, the effect is so small that it's immeasurable by direct means.

			    Why? The actual amount of heat generated per square meter of Earth is quite  small, especially compared to the amount of heat necessary to warm the ocean.  Geothermal energy emanating from the Earth averages only about one tenth of a  watt per square meter. At that rate of heat flow (without taking ocean currents  into account), it would take well over a year just to heat the bottom meter of the  ocean by one degree Centigrade. 

However, the ocean is not standing still. Complex deep ocean currents driven  by density variations in temperature and salinity are constantly replacing the  bottom layer of ocean water with colder water.

###### Get **Social**

###### More **Information**

          -  What is a current?
          -  What is the global ocean conveyor belt?
          -  Science on a Sphere: Ocean Conveyor Belt Animation

Did you know?

Winds drive currents that are at or near the ocean's surface. Near coastal areas winds tend to drive currents on a localized scale and can result in phenomena like coastal upwelling. 

**Last updated:**   01/18/24**Author:** NOAAHow to cite this article

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
**Exhibit
      17.1**





August
      30, 2007





Mr.
      Dan
      Basso


Chairman
      of the Board


T
      Bank,
      N.A. and T Bancshares, Inc.


16000
      Dallas Parkway, Suite 125


Dallas,
      TX 75248





Dear
      Dan:





This
      letter will serve as my formal resignation as a director of T Bank, N.A. and
      T
      Bancshares, Inc., effective immediately. I find that I can no longer make the
      time commitment required to be an effective director and have the time I want,
      and need, to spend with my family.





Sincerely,





James
      D.
      Rose
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**156 KA 07-02678** 
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, SCONIERS, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JASON CURRY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (PHILIP ROTHSCHILD OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (BRENTON P. DADEY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (William D. Walsh, J.), rendered September 26, 2007. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03 [3]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, County Court properly refused to suppress the handgun found on his person by a police officer inasmuch as the officer had reasonable suspicion to detain and subsequently frisk him ( see generally People v De Bour , 40 NY2d 210, 223). According to the transcript of the suppression hearing, while investigating a reported fight between two black males with handguns, the officer was informed by three witnesses that the men involved in the fight had “just walked in” a nearby market. The officer responded to the market immediately and, upon opening the door to the market, he observed defendant in the doorway. Defendant “stepped into” and attempted to “push past” the officer, at which point the officer ordered defendant to stop. Based on the information known to the officer and defendant’s furtive behavior upon encountering the officer in the doorway, the officer had reasonable suspicion to detain defendant ( see id. ; see generally People v May , 81 NY2d 725, 728). The officer was also authorized to frisk defendant once defendant moved his hand quickly toward his waistband as the officer pulled him aside for questioning. “A corollary of the statutory right to temporarily detain for questioning is the authority to frisk if the officer reasonably suspects that he [or she] is in danger of physical injury by virtue of the detainee being armed” ( De Bour , 40 NY2d at 223). It is well settled that a**-2- 156 KA 07-02678** 

police officer need not “await the glint of steel before [the officer] can act to preserve his [or her] safety” ( People v Benjamin , 51 NY2d 267, 271).

Entered: February 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MICHAEL BENDE
, Appellant,

v.

AURORA BANK
, FSB, et al.

,

Appellee s

.

No. 4D 14

- 3106

[ August 5, 2015 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Eli Berger , Judge; L.T. Case No. 2012CA012213XXXXMB

.

Michael Bende, Boca Raton, pro se.

No appearance for appellees.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee

, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979).

W ARNER

, M AY and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur

.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
*Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50378

RUDY VAN WILLIAMS Plaintiff-Appellee

v. OFFICER FNU RAMIREZ, Gang Intelligents Officer Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-cv-00491
Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Defendant-Appellant Officer Ramirez brings this interlocutory appeal to challenge the district court’s denial ofhis motion to dismiss and/or for summary judgment based on qualified immunity. Because genuine issues of material fact remain tobe resolved, we have no jurisdiction to decide this interlocutory appeal. Appeal dismissed. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D June 11, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.1




Schedule of Executive Officers who are Parties
to the Amended and Restated Severance Agreements in the Forms Filed as
Exhibit 10(e) to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2010
    






Form A of Severance Agreement


John G. Morikis




Form B of Severance Agreement


Joel D. Baxter
Peter J. Ippolito




Form C of Severance Pay Agreement


Jane M. Cronin
Mary L. Garceau
Thomas P. Gilligan
James R. Jaye
Robert F. Lynch
Allen J. Mistysyn
David B. Sewell
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of Green Mt.  Labs.,  Inc.(the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Geoff
Williams,  Principal Accounting Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.


/s/ Geoff Williams
-------------------------------
Geoff Williams
Principal Accounting Officer
August 19, 2004

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
     other document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the
     signature that appears in typed form within the electronic  version of this
     written  statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
     the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its
     staff upon  request.  The foregoing  certifications  are  accompanying  the
     Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
     Act of 2002  (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of title
     18,  United  States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB
     or as a separate disclosure document.
STATE of North Carolina v. Marcos Antonio VALAZQUEZ.

No. 96P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 24, 2004.

Daniel Pollitt, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Marcos Antonio Valazquez.

Thomas Lawton, III, Assistant Attorney General, William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Clark Everitt, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 2nd day of March 2004 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 2nd day of March 2004 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."
Exhibit 32.1



Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2001.



In connection with the Quarterly Report of AT&S Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard G. Honan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001,

that:



·

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



·

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  May 13, 2005



/s/ Richard G. Honan

------------------------

Richard G. Honan,

Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Jay D. Nielsen, certify that: 

     1. I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Beef Packing Company,LLC; 

     2. Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

     3. Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

     4. Theregistrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

     a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

     b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and 

     c)disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

     5. Theregistrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

     a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

     b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting. 

|     |  |                                         |
|-----|--|-----------------------------------------|
| By: |  | /s/ Jay D. Nielsen                      |
|     |  | Jay D. Nielsen*Chief Financial Officer* |

Date: April 6, 2006