alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                        1,193,246
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 960,896
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   146,956
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              2,450,551
<PP&E>                        1,606,643
<DEPRECIATION>                (1,062,452)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                7,888,753
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         3,960,760
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      7,399
<OTHER-SE>                    610,442
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  7,888,753
<SALES>                       3,965,645
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              3,965,645
<CGS>                         2,856,106
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 3,109,581
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            1,031,274
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (3,031,316)
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (3,031,316)
<DISCONTINUED>                (4,687,358)
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (7,718,674)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (0.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (0.47)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Alan Campbell, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 (the Quarterly Report), which this statement accompanies fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) for the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certificate is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906.

Dated: April 25, 2006

/s/ Alan CampbellAlan CampbellSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
May 15,
1997 Smith Barney Municipal Money Market Portfolio
388 Greenwich Street
New York, N.Y. 10013

                  Re:  Rule 24f-2 Notice
                             
Gentlemen:

  In connection with the filing by Smith Barney Municipal
Money Market Portfolio, a Maryland Corporation (the
"Fund"), of a Notice (the "Notice"), pursuant to Rule 24f-
2 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended
(the "Act"), for the Fund's fiscal year ended March 31,
1997, the undersigned hereby provides the legal opinion
required by that Rule.

     In accordance with Rule 24f-2, the Fund has
registered an indefinite number of shares of common stock,
$0.01 par value, under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the "1933 Act"). The purpose of the Notice is to
make definite the registration of  23,169,104,653 shares
of the Fund (the "Shares") sold in reliance upon the Rule
during the fiscal year ended March 31, 1997.

   The undersigned is Associate General Counsel of Smith
Barney Mutual Funds Management Inc., the Fund's
administrator, and in such capacity, from time to time and
for certain purposes, acts as counsel to the Fund. He has
examined copies of the Fund's Articles of Incorporation,
its By-Laws, resolutions adopted by its Directors, and
such other records and documents as have been deemed
necessary for purposes of this opinion.  Furthermore, he
has examined a Certificate of the Controller of the Fund
to the effect that the Fund received the cash
consideration for each of the Shares in accordance with
the aforementioned organizational documents and
resolutions.

     On the basis of the foregoing, and assuming all of
the Shares were sold in accordance with the terms of the
Fund's Prospectus in effect at the time of sale, he is of
the opinion that the Shares have been duly authorized and
validly issued and are fully paid and non-assessable.
This opinion is for the limited purposes expressed above
and should not be deemed to be an expression of opinion as
to compliance with the 1933 Act, the 1940 Act or
applicable State "blue sky" laws in connection with the
sales of the Shares.


                                        Very truly yours,


                                        Rob Nelson
                                        Associate General
                                        Counsel
                                        Smith Barney
Mutual Funds
Management Inc.
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 120 (Thursday, June 23, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 37512]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13372]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

[DOCKET NO. 22-15]

Pro Transport Charleston, Inc., Complainant v. Allround Midwest 
Forwarding, Inc., Respondent; Notice of Filing of Complaint and 
Assignment

Served: June 13, 2022.
    Notice is given that a complaint has been filed with the Federal 
Maritime Commission (Commission) by Pro Transport Charleston, Inc. (Pro 
Transport), hereinafter ``Complainant'', against Allround Midwest 
Forwarding, Inc. (Allround), hereinafter ``Respondent''. Complainant 
alleges that Respondent is an ocean transportation intermediary (OTI) 
organized as a corporation under the laws of Delaware with Cleveland, 
OH as its principal place of business.
    Complainant alleges that Respondent violated 46 U.S.C. 40902 for 
its failure to maintain a surety bond. The full text of the complaint 
can be found in the Commission's Electronic Reading Room at https://www2.fmc.gov/readingroom/proceeding/22-15/.
    This proceeding has been assigned to Office of Administrative Law 
Judges. The initial decision of the presiding officer in this 
proceeding shall be issued by June 13, 2023, and the final decision of 
the Commission shall be issued by January 9, 2024.

William Cody,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-13372 Filed 6-22-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-02-P
```
Climate Stories Project 

Classroom questions for interview study 

In this activity, you will listen to a recorded interview from the “Climate Stories” page on the Climate Stories 

Project and take notes as you listen. Answer the following questions as best you can; some questions may not 

apply to certain interviews. In class, share your notes from the interview and the answers to the questions with a 

partner or a small group. 

Name of interviewee _________________________________________________________ 

1) What is the interviewee’s name? Where do they live? What do they do (work, school, etc)? 

2) What do they value in their local environment? What changes have they seen in their environment due 

to climate change? 

3) How are they responding to the changes around them? How is their community responding? 

4) How do they feel about the climate change happening now or in the future? 

5) What are their hopes and vision for the future? How are they working toward creating a better 

world?
Exhibit






 EXHIBIT 10.10
Restricted Stock Units - Award Summary
	
		
	View Award

	Award Summary
	 

	Participant Name
	<Name>

	Stock Symbol
	XRX

	Award Date
	<Date>

	Award Type
	RSU

	Award Description
	Restricted Stock Unit

	Future Vesting

	Vest Date
	Vest Quantity

	<Date>
	<# of Shares>

	<Date>
	<# of Shares>

	<Date>
	<# of Shares>








1







Restricted Stock Units - Award Summary
	
		
	View Award

	Award Summary
	 

	Participant Name
	<Name>

	Stock Symbol
	XRX

	Award Date
	<Date>

	Award Type
	RSU

	Award Description
	Restricted Stock Unit

	Future Vesting

	Vest Date
	Vest Quantity

	<Date>
	<# of Shares>

	<Date>
	<# of Shares>








2







Restricted Stock Units - Award Summary
	
		
	View Award

	Award Summary
	 

	Participant Name
	<Name>

	Stock Symbol
	XRX

	Award Date
	<Date>

	Award Type
	RSU

	Award Description
	Restricted Stock Unit

	Future Vesting

	Vest Date
	Vest Quantity

	<Date>
	<# of Shares>










3
William A. TRUDEAU, Jr., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9491

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

The petition for rehearing is denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0308

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ZECHARIAH JUSTIN DANIEL SMITH,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 12, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 3 2023

04/03/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0308
CENTURION FUNDS, INC.
              Centurion U.S. Contra Fund (the Fund)
              Supplement dated November 13, 2001 to
                  Prospectus dated May 31, 2001

The   following   information  supplements  certain   information
contained   in   the  Prospectus  and  Statement  of   Additional
Information of the Fund.

On  October 3, 2001, GE Financial Assurance Holdings, Inc. (GEFA)
entered  into  a Purchase Agreement with Centurion Capital  Group
Inc.  (Centurion Capital), the parent company of Centurion  Trust
Company   (CTC),  the  Fund's  investment  manager,  and  certain
officers,  directors and shareholders of Centurion  Capital  (the
Purchase   Agreement),  pursuant  to  which  GEFA  will   acquire
Centurion Capital (the Acquisition).

On  October 22, 2001, the Board of Directors of Centurion  Funds,
Inc.(the Company), on the recommendation of  CTC, voted in  favor
of  the following proposals and instructed that they be submitted
to  the  Fund's  shareholders for their  approval  at  a  meeting
scheduled to be held on December 6, 2001:

     1.   Approving a new investment management agreement for the Fund
       providing for CTC to continue as investment manager under terms
       and conditions substantially identical to the current investment
       management agreement;

     2.   Approving a new investment sub-advisory agreement for the
       Fund providing for Credit Suisse Asset Management, LLC  to
       continue as investment sub-adviser of the Fund under terms and
       conditions substantially identical to the current investment sub-
       advisory agreement; and

     3.   Electing four new directors to the Board of Directors of the
       Company.

If  the foregoing changes are approved by shareholders, the Board
of  Directors  has  voted to implement these  additional  changes
which do not require shareholder consideration:

     A)  Replacing  the current distributor of the Fund,  Salomon
Smith Barney Inc.(SSB), with GE Investment Distributors, Inc. and

     B)  Terminating  the  consulting services  provided  by  SSB
through its Consulting Group Division on December 6, 2001.

Except  for  the consulting agreement with SSB, all  the  matters
described  above  will become effective at  the  closing  of  the
Acquisition.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Each of
the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of China Fire
& Security Group, Inc. (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)
 The Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
 The information contained in the Amendment No.1 to the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      November 20, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Brian LinName:
        Brian LinTitle: Chief
      Executive Officer




Dated:
      November 20, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Xiaoyuan YuanName: Xiaoyuan
      YuanTitle:  
      Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial
    Officer
THREATS TO CORAL REEFS

Make sustainable seafood 

choices. Learn more at 

www. FishWatch.gov.

Only take what you need. 

Catch and release sh that 

you don’t plan to eat.

Be a responsible aquarium 

owner. Know where your sh 

come from and DO NOT release 

unwanted sh into the wild.

FISHING SPAWNING 

AGGREGATIONS

Some species gather in 

large numbers at 

predictable times and 

locations to mate. 

Spawning aggregations 

are particularly 

vulnerable to 

overshing.

MARINE DEBRIS

Traps set too close to reefs and 

marine debris, such as ghost traps, 

lost nets, monolament, and lines, 

can damage coral reefs, which take a 

long time to recover.

FISHING TOO 

MANY BIG FISH

Large sh produce more 

young that are likely to 

survive to adulthood. 

Their absence means sh 

populations dwindle over 

time.

FISHING NURSERIES

Nearshore habitats serve as nurseries for 

many sh. Catching young sh in nets 

removes them before they can help replenish 

the population.

INDISCRIMINATE FISHING

Use of non-selective gears, like nets 

and traps, often removes more 

herbivorous shes. These sh eat 

algae and help keep the ecosystem 

in balance.

Educate yourself on local 

shing rules and regulations.

Your state shery agency or 

bait and tackle shop can help 

you learn more.

Coral reef sh are a signicant food source for over a billion people worldwide. Many coastal and 

island communities depend on coral reef sheries for their economic, social, and cultural benets.

BUT too much of a good thing can be bad for coral reefs.

HOW YOU CAN HELP
Nicholas D. WEIR, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 18-9611

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I,the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Controller of GrayMark Productions,Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, theQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the six months ended June30, 2004 (the “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and thatinformation contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  October 5, 2004 | /s/ HARRY  GRAY FREDERICKSON, JR. |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                   | Chief Executive Officer           |

 

----
Leigh Laz LEPON, Petitioner v. IOWA

No. 19-6868

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Iowa denied.
Wayne POWE, et ux., Applicants, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY.

No. 19A721 (19-1024)

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Application for stay addressed to Justice Sotomayor and referred to the Court denied.
SOUTHERN INV. PROPERTIES, LLC v. WATSON

No. COA04-49

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed December 21, 2004

Certification Date January 10, 2005

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
terms and conditions hereof. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the undersigned Guarantorsatisfies the provisions of Section 11.03 of the Indenture, it shall automatically be released ofits obligations hereunder without the necessity of any action being taken by any Person andregardless of whether this Guarantee is amended to reflect such release. This is a Guarantee ofpayment and not a guarantee of collection.     For purposes hereof, the undersigned Guarantor’s liability shall be that amount from time totime equal to the aggregate liability of such Guarantor under this Note Guarantee, but shall belimited to the lesser of (a) the aggregate amount of the obligations of the Issuer under the Notesand the Indenture and (b) the amount, if any, which would not have (A) rendered such Guarantor"*insolvent*” (as such term is defined in the federal Bankruptcy Law and in the Debtor and CreditorLaw of the State of New York), (B) left it with unreasonably small capital at the time this NoteGuarantee was entered into, or at the time the undersigned Guarantor Incurred liability hereunder,after giving effect to the Incurrence of existing Indebtedness immediately prior to such time or(C) left such Guarantor with debts beyond its ability to pay as such debts mature; *provided*that,it shall be a presumption in any lawsuit or other proceeding in which such Guarantor is a partythat the amount Guaranteed pursuant to its Note Guarantee is the amount set forth in subsection (a)above unless any creditor, or representative of creditors of such Guarantor, or debtor inpossession or trustee in bankruptcy of such Guarantor, otherwise proves in such a lawsuit or otherproceeding that the aggregate liability of such Guarantor is limited to the amount set forth insubsection (b). In making any determination as to the solvency or sufficiency of capital of theundersigned Guarantor in accordance with the previous sentence, the right of such Guarantor tocontribution from other Guarantors and any other rights such Guarantor may have, contractual orotherwise, shall be taken into account.     The undersigned Guarantor hereby certifies and warrants that all acts, conditions and thingsrequired to be done and performed and to have happened precedent to the creation and issuance ofthis Note Guarantee and to constitute the valid obligation of such Guarantor have been done andperformed and have happened in due compliance with all applicable laws.     The terms of this Guarantee shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws ofthe State of New York without regard to the conflict of laws principles thereof.     Capitalized terms used herein have the same meanings given in the Indenture, dated as ofDecember 23, 2009 (the “*Indenture*”), among National Money Mart Company (the “*Issuer*”), theGuarantors (as defined therein) and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, unless otherwiseindicated.
2 

 
     Dated: February 25, 2011      DOLLAR FINANCIAL U.S., INC.
HomeEducationNonpoint Source Pollution

# Marinas and Boating Activities

## Pollution Tutorial

Marinas and boating activities can also contribute to nonpoint source pollution. Chemicals used to maintain and repair boats, such as solvents, oils, paints, and cleansers, may spill into the water, or make their way into waterbodies via runoff. Spilling fuel (gasoline or oil) at marinas or discharging uncombusted fuels from engines also contribute to nonpoint source pollution. In addition, poorly maintained sanitary waste systems aboard boats or poorly maintained pump-out stations at marinas can significantly increase bacteria and nutrient levels in the water.

A popular recreational activity, boating can also contribute to nonpoint source pollution. Chemicals used on boats, such as oils, paints and cleansers, may spill into the water. Spilled fuel or discharged uncombusted fuels from engines can also contaminate waters around the marina. Poorly maintained pump-out stations can lead to high bacteria and nutrient levels in the water as well.

### Pollution Lessons

              - Welcome
              - A Brief History of Pollution
              Categories of Pollution
              - Point Source
              - Nonpoint Source
              - Urban and Suburban Areas
              - Agricultural Operations
              - Atmospheric Inputs
              - Forestry and Mining Operations
              - Marinas and Boating Activities
              Pollutants from Nonpoint Sources
              - Nutrients
              - Suspended Sediments
              - Pesticides and Toxic Chemicals
              - Bacteria, Viruses, and Trash
              - Research, Monitoring, and Assessment
              - Controlling Nonpoint Source Pollution
              - What You Can Do
              - References
              - Roadmap to Resouces
              - Subject Review (PDF)

----

National Science Teaching Association (NSTA)

###### **Search** Education

###### Get **Social**

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
LONGINO v. LONGINO

S04F0876

Supreme Court of Georgia.

June 28, 2004.

Judgment affirmed without opinion.
Independent Auditors' Consent




To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
Consulting Group Capital Markets Funds:
We consent to the incorporation by reference, in this
Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information, of our
report dated May 8, 2001, on the statement of assets and
liabilities for the Multi-Strategy Market Neutral
Investments of Consulting Group Markets Funds as of March
31, 2001, and the related statement of operations for the
year ended and the statements of changes in net assets and
financial highlights for the year then ended and for the
period from May 10, 1999 to March 31, 2000.  These financial
statements and financial highlights and our report thereon
are included in the Annual Report of the Fund as filed on
Form N-30D.
We also consent to the references to our firm under the
headings "Financial Highlights" in the Prospectus and
"Counsel and Auditors" in the Statement of Additional
Information.



KPMG LLP
New York, New York
July 25, 2001

Page