alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
31.2





CERTIFICATIONS





I, Robert
A. Hildebrand, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed the report being filed on amendment number 1 on Form 10-QSB/A by GREEN
ENERGY HOLDING CORP.





2. Based
on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by the report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in the report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of GREEN ENERGY HOLDING CORP.as
of, and for, the periods presented in the report;





4. I and
the other certifying officer are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Regulation 13a-14
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) for GREEN ENERGY HOLDING CORP.and
have:





i.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to GREEN ENERGY HOLDING CORP., including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which the periodic reports are being prepared;





ii.
Evaluated the effectiveness of GREEN ENERGY HOLDING CORP.'s disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of the
report ("Evaluation Date"); and





iii.
Presented in the report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;





5. I and
the other certifying officer have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, to the GREEN ENERGY HOLDING CORP. auditors and the audit committee
of the board of directors (or persons fulfilling the
equivalent function):





i. All
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect GREEN ENERGY HOLDING CORP.'s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for GREEN ENERGY HOLDING
CORP.'s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and





ii. Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the issuer's internal controls; and





6. I and
the other certifying officer have indicated in the report whether or not there
were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date:
      May 13, 2008
              By:
              /s/
      Robert A. HildebrandRobert
      A. Hildebrand, Chief
      Financial Officer
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Millennium Chemicals Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 25, 2003 and as amended by the
Company's Form 10-K/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, John E. Lushefski, Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 'SS' 1350, as adopted pursuant to 'SS' 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: November 12, 2003

                                                    /s/ JOHN E. LUSHEFSKI
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                      John E. Lushefski
                                                  Executive Vice President
                                                 and Chief Financial Officer


This certification, which is required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, is "furnished" to the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance
with Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K, 17 CFR 229.601(b)(32)(ii)).
<Page>

                                                                 Exhibit 10.9(b)


                           MILLENNIUM AMERICA HOLDINGS


                                  Amendment To

                       MILLENNIUM CHEMICALS GRANDFATHERED
                     SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN

                                  (the "Plan")


     The Plan shall be, and it hereby is, amended effective June 1, 2002 as
follows:

1.       Section 10.3 Change of Control

     Amend clause (iv) of Section 10.3 to read in its entirety as follows:


     "(iv) the stockholders of the Parent approve a plan of complete liquidation
     of the Parent or the closing of the sale or disposition by the Parent of
     all or substantially all of the Parent's assets other than the sale or
     disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Parent to one
     or more Subsidiaries (as defined below) of the Parent or to a person or
     persons who beneficially own, directly or indirectly, at least fifty
     percent (50%) or more of the combined voting power of the outstanding
     voting securities of the Parent at the time of the sale or disposition;
     provided, however, (y) the sale or disposition of all or any part of the
     Parent's interests in Equistar Chemicals, LP ("Equistar")(and all
     subsequent sales and dispositions of any securities or assets received as
     proceeds thereof, or as proceeds of proceeds) shall not be deemed to
     constitute a Change in Control, and (z) if the Parent sells or disposes
     of all or any part of the Parent's interests in Equistar indirectly (either
     through the sale or other disposition of any entity that owns, directly or
     indirectly, all or any part of the Parent's interests in Equistar, or
     otherwise), then the sale or disposition of the Parent's interests in
     Equistar (and all subsequent sales and dispositions of any securities or
     assets received as proceeds thereof, or as proceeds of proceeds) shall be
     ignored and disregarded in determining whether any such Change in Control
     has occurred. By way of illustration, if an indirect subsidiary of the
     Parent that owns the Parent's interests in Equistar together with certain
     other assets is sold, then, in determining whether a Change in Control has
     occurred, all relevant determinations shall be made pursuant to the
     assumption that (y) such subsidiary owns only such other assets, and (z)
     neither such subsidiary nor the Parent owns, either directly or indirectly,
     the interests in Equistar. "Subsidiary" shall have the meaning set forth in
     Section 424 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended or superseded,
     and the term shall also include any partnership, limited liability company
     or other business entity if the Parent owns directly or indirectly,
     securities or other ownership interests representing at least fifty percent
     (50%) of the ordinary voting power or equity or capital interests of such
     entity."
Benjamin F. HOWARD v. STATE.

No. 344P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 3, 2005.

Christopher W. Brooks, Assistant Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th day of July 2004 by Plaintiff for a hearing on the merits:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of February 2005."
HomeOcean Facts

# Where is all of the Earth's water?

## The ocean holds about 97 percent of the Earth's water; the remaining three percent is found in glaciers and ice, below the ground, in rivers and lakes.

Of the world's total water supply of about 332 million cubic miles of water, about 97 percent is found in the ocean.

The ocean holds about 97 percent of the Earth's water; the remaining three percent is distributed in many different places, including glaciers and ice, below the ground, in rivers and lakes, and in the atmosphere.

According to the U.S. Geological Survey, there are over 332,519,000 cubic miles of water on the planet. A cubic mile is the volume of a cube measuring one mile on each side. Of this vast volume of water, NOAA's National Geophysical Data Center estimates that 321,003,271 cubic miles is in the ocean. 

###### Get **Social**

###### More **Information**

          - The World's Water (U.S. Geological Survey)
          - How much water is there on, in, and above the Earth? (U.S. Geological Survey)
          - Volumes of the World's Oceans
          - The Ocean’s Role in Weather and Climate
          - The Hydrologic Cycle

**Last updated:**   01/18/24**Author:** NOAAHow to cite this article

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
EXHIBIT
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of New York Mortgage Trust, Inc, (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
                November 14, 2007
            
            /s/ David
                A. AkreCo-Chief
                Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Riviera Tool Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending August 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth
K. Rieth, Director and Chief Executive Officer, of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Dated: December 1, 2003              By: /s/ Kenneth K. Rieth
                                         ---------------------
                                         Kenneth K. Rieth
                                         Director and Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form with the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
STATE of North Carolina v. Howard Thomas OGLES.

No. 7P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 6, 2004.

Brenda S. McLain, Shelby, for Ogles.

R. Kirk Randleman, Assistant Attorney General, William C. Young, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th day of January 2004 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of May 2004."
James Odell BAXTER, II, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5282

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 16, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Justice Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Golden Oval Eggs, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended February 28, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Doug Leifermann, VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
|                       | By:                                       | /s/ Doug Leifermann |   |
|----------------------------|-------------------------------------------|---------------------|--------|
|                       | Doug Leifermann                           | * *            |
|                       | *Vice  President/Chief Financial Officer* |                |
|                       | * *                                  |
| Date:  April 13, 2005 | * *                                  |

 

1

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 22, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-10622 Summary Calendar

CHARLES ALLEN HOUSE, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:03-CV-00320-A

-------------------- Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Charles Allen House, federal prisoner #06081-112, appeals the dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, which challenged his conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine. House argues that he is actually innocent of the offense of conviction because his indictment did not cite 21 U.S.C. § 846 and further, that the district court did not determine whether he properly filed his petition in the Northern District of Texas pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1651(a) andNo. 03-10622 -2- 2241. The district court found that House’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition was improperly filed and was not salvaged by 28 U.S.C. § 2255's “savings clause.” House was not entitled to pursue habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 1651 because he remains in custody and has not completed his sentence. See United States v. Dyer , 136 F.3d 417, 422 (5th Cir. 1998). Moreover, because House is not incarcerated in Texas, the district court did not have jurisdiction to entertain his petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. See Lee v. Wetzel , 244 F.3d 370, 373-75 (5th Cir. 2001). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is VACATED and the case is REMANDED with instructions to DISMISS House’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction.
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 3- 27 01

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el le e

v. 20 04 Ch ev ro le t M on te Carl o, VIN# 2G1 W W 12 E34 92 09 70 0

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t Jo ey Ant wanSm it h
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Cl ai man t - Ap pe ll an t

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e So ut he rnDis tri ctof I owa- Des M oi ne s

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Ju ne 25 , 20 14 Fil ed : J ul y

1, 2 01 4 [Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re GRUENDER, BOW MAN, an d S HEPHERD, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.In th is ci vi l fo rfei tu re act io n, Jo ey Sm it h ap pe al s th e di stric t co urt’s de ni al of 1 hi s Fed eral Ru le of Ci v i l P r o c edur e 60 (b )(6 ) m ot io n fo r rel ie f fro m th e jud gm en t. Upo n care fu l rev ie w of th e reco rd an d th e pa rti es ’ arg um en ts on ap pe al , we co nc lu de th at Sm it h di d no t pr es en t a va li d ba si s fo r po st -jud gm en t rel ie f, an d th at th e di st ric t co urt di d no t ab us e it s di sc ret io n in de nyin g hi s po st -jud gm en t m ot io n. See Mu rp hy
v. Mo

. Dep ’t of Co rr., 50 6 F.3 d 11 11 , 11 17 (8 th Ci r. 20 07 ) (d is tri ct co urt’s de ni al of Ru le 60 (b )(6 ) m ot io n is rev ie wed fo r ab us e of di sc ret io n) ; se e al so Arn ol d v. W oo d, 23 8 F.3 d 99 2, 99 8 (8t h Cir. 20 01 ) (b ecau se Ru le 60 (b ) m ot io n can no t subs ti tu te fo r ap pe al , ap pe al fro m de ni al of Ru le 60 (b ) m ot io n do es n o t pr es en t un de rlyin g jud gm en t fo r app el la te rev ie w; Ru le 60 (b ) is no t ve hi cl e fo r si m pl e rear gu m en t on m eri ts ); Ivy v. Kim

br ou gh , 11 5 F.3d 55 0, 5 52 (8 th Ci r. 19 97 ) (at to rn ey ’s ig no ran ce orcare le ss ne ss do es no t co ns ti tu te ex cu sabl e n eg le ct ).

Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm . See 8 th Cir . R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Hon or ab le Ro be rt W

. Prat t, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e So ut he rn 1 Dis tri ctof I owa
. -2

-
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATIONS  I, Charles D. Hamm, certify that:1.
    
    I have reviewed this amendment no. 1 to the quarterly report on Form
10-Q/A of ProCentury Corporation (ProCentury);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of ProCentury as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    ProCenturys other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for ProCentury
and have:  a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures or
caused such disclosure controls to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
ProCentury, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of ProCenturys disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures as at the end of the period concerned by this report
based on such evaluation;c)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in ProCenturys
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
ProCenturys most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
ProCenturys internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    ProCenturys other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to ProCenturys auditors and the audit committee of ProCenturys board
of directors:  d)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
ProCenturys ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; ande)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in
ProCenturys internal control over financial reporting. August 18, 2004   /s/ Charles D. Hamm   Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
CTIA - THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION, Petitioner v. CITY OF BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA, et al.

No. 19-439

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Arthur LOPEZ, Petitioner v. Cheryl LOPEZ

No. 19-6734

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three denied.