alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michael Barry VALENTINE v. STATE of North Carolina.

No. 311P00-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 2, 2004.

Michael B. Valentine, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th day of September 2004 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of December 2004."
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of SkyePharma PLC, a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

The
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") of the Company fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: June 28, 2004 |  |        |                                  
|-------------------- |  | ------ | ---------------------------------
|                     |  | By:    | /s/DONALD NICHOLSON              
|                     |  | Title: | Donald Nicholson
Finance Director

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) as an exhibit to the Report.

---



QuickLinks
KELLY, Supt., OR v. Laycelle T. WHITE

No. 19-265 (R46-013 / OT 2019).

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 16, 2020.

The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed on March 16, 2020, pursuant to Rule 46.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Home  Ocean Facts
 What is a kelp forest? Kelp forests provide food and shelter for thousands of species  kelp forest	
    				In ideal conditions, kelp  can grow up to 18 inches per day, and in stark contrast to the colorful and slow-growing corals, the giant kelp canopies tower above the ocean floor. Like  trees in a forest, these giant algae provide food and shelter for many organisms. Also like a terrestrial forest, kelp forests experience seasonal changes.  Storms and large weather events, like  El Niño, can tear and dislodge the kelp, leaving a tattered winter forest to begin its growth again each spring.  Kelp forests can be seen along much of the west coast of North America. Kelp are  large brown algae that live in cool, relatively shallow waters close to the shore. They grow in dense groupings much like a forest on land.  These underwater towers of kelp provide food and shelter for thousands of fish, invertebrates, and marine mammal species. Kelp forests harbor a greater variety and higher diversity of plants and animals than almost any other ocean community. Many organisms use the thick blades as a safe shelter for their young from predators or even rough storms. Among the many mammals and birds that use kelp forests for protection or  feeding are seals, sea lions, whales, sea otters, gulls, terns,  snowy egrets, great blue herons, cormorants, and shore birds. These dense canopies of algae generally occur in cold, nutrient-rich waters. Because of their dependency upon light for  photosynthesis, kelp forests form in  shallow open waters and  are  rarely found deeper than 49-131 feet. NOAA scientists study kelp forests by visiting the same locations over and over to assess the presence and abundance of a variety of organisms. Monitoring allows marine scientists to determine if the kelp forest is changing over time and to identify the cause of those changes, whether natural or human.
  Get **Social**   More **Information**  Kelp Forests, National Marine Sanctuaries
				Kelp Forest and Rocky Subtidal Habitats, Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary
								Sea Otters and Kelp (Ocean Today video)  Did you know?   The Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve in California is home to a population of more than 100 sea otters.  See for yourself! Visit Elkhorn Slough's real-time  Otter Cam.
    **Last updated:**   01/18/24**Author:** NOAAHow to cite this article  Contact Us


Provide Feedback
                        Contact Us
                        Report an error


Science. Service.Stewardship.
 About NOS About Us
						NOS Program Offices
						Media Inquiries
						Website Acknowledgements
 Resources Site Index
						Disclaimer
						Freedom of Information Act
						Accessibility
 More Resources Information Quality
						Privacy Policy
						NOS For Employees
						USA.gov
 National Ocean Service
								National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
								Department of Commerce
 Social
# L_2016074EN.01000101.xml

| 19.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 74/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 74/1

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2016/402

of 15 January 2016

concerning the signing and conclusion of the Agreement between the Council of Ministers of the Republic of Albania and the European Union on security procedures for exchanging and protecting classified information

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, in particular Article 37 thereof, and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, in particular Article 218(5) and the first subparagraph of Article 218(6) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | At its meeting on 20 January 2014, the Council decided to authorise the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (HR) to open negotiations pursuant to Article 37 of the Treaty on European Union and in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 218(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union in order to conclude an Agreement on the security of information between the Council of Ministers of the Republic of Albania and the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

At its meeting on 20 January 2014, the Council decided to authorise the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (HR) to open negotiations pursuant to Article 37 of the Treaty on European Union and in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 218(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union in order to conclude an Agreement on the security of information between the Council of Ministers of the Republic of Albania and the European Union.

| (2) | Following that authorisation, the HR negotiated an Agreement with the Council of Ministers of the Republic of Albania on security procedures for exchanging and protecting classified information. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Following that authorisation, the HR negotiated an Agreement with the Council of Ministers of the Republic of Albania on security procedures for exchanging and protecting classified information.

| (3) | That Agreement should be approved, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

That Agreement should be approved,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Agreement between the Council of Ministers of the Republic of Albania and the European Union on security procedures for exchanging and protecting classified information is hereby approved on behalf of the Union.

The text of the Agreement is attached to this Decision.

Article 2

The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign the Agreement in order to bind the Union.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 15 January 2016.

For the Council

The President

J.R.V.A. DIJSSELBLOEM

---
UNIFOUR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC. d/b/a Extraordinary Kitchens, David B. Newton, and Nancy B. Newton v. BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., and FIRST SOUTH CONSTRUCTION, INC.

No. 203P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 24, 2004.

Andrew J. Santaniello, High Point, for BellSouth and First South.

C. Gary Triggs, Morganton, for Unifour Constr. and Newtons.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 4th day of May 2004 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."
----

Resolution on the way forward for the financial perspectives 2007-2013

(2006/C 115/16)

THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS,

HAVING REGARD TO its opinion on the financial perspective: Communication on Building Our Common Future: Policy Challenges and Budgetary Means of the Enlarged Union 2007-2013 (CdR 162/2004 fin);

HAVING REGARD TO the European Parliament resolution on Policy Challenges and Budgetary Means of the enlarged Union 2007-2013 (A6-0153/2005);

adopted the following resolution at its 62nd plenary session of 16 and 17 November 2005 (meeting of 17 November):

The Committee of the Regions

Brussels, 17 November 2005.

The President

of the Committee of the Regions

Peter STRAUB

----
Corals have a symbiotic relationship with 

microscopic algae called zooxanthellae 

that live in their tissues. These algae are 

the coral’s primary food source and give 

them their color.

HEALTHY CORAL

When the symbiotic relationship 

becomes stressed due to increased 

ocean temperature or pollution, the 

algae leave the coral's tissue. 

STRESSED CORAL BLEACHED CORAL

Without the algae, the coral loses its 

major source of food, turns white or 

very pale, and is more susceptible to 

disease.

WHAT CAUSES

BLEACHING?

Change in ocean 

temperature

Increased ocean 

temperature caused 

by climate change is the 

leading cause of coral 

bleaching. 

Runo and pollution 

Storm generated precipitation 

 can rapidly dilute ocean 

 water and runo can 

carry pollutants — these can 

bleach near-shore corals.

Overexposure to 

sunlight

When temperatures are high, 

high solar irradiance 

contributes to bleaching in 

shallow-water corals.

Extreme low tides

Exposure to the air during 

extreme low tides can cause 

bleaching in shallow corals. 

Coral and algae depend on 

each other to survive.

If stressed, algae leaves 

the coral.

Coral is left bleached and 1 2 3vulnerable.

NOAA’s Coral Reef Conservation Program

http://coralreef.noaa.gov/

Have you ever wondered how a coral becomes bleached?
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cohen & Company Inc. (the Company) for the three months ended March 31,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph W. Pooler, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Signed:

/s/ Joseph W. Pooler, Jr.Name:

Joseph W. Pooler, Jr.Title:

Executive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer


Date:
May 7, 2010
| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the consolidated financial condition of the company as                of the                dates presented and consolidated results of operations of the company                for                the periods presented. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                        |   |   |                                               |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
| November              14,              2007 |   |   | /s/              Sandra              Batt          |
|                                        |   |   | Sandra                Batt Chief Financial Officer |

----
STATE of North Carolina v. David Lee TURNER.

No. 149P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 6, 2004.

David Lee Turner, Pro Se.

Christopher W. Brooks, Assistant Attorney General, Robert F. Johnson, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 26th day of March 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the Order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of May 2004."
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 134 

To repeal the provision of law that provides automatic pay adjustments 

for Members of Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2013 

Mr. MATHESON (for himself, Mr. COBLE, Mr. MCCAUL, and Mr. PETERS of 

Michigan) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on 

Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To repeal the provision of law that provides automatic pay 

adjustments for Members of Congress. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF AUTOMATIC PAY ADJUST4 MENTS FOR MEMBERS OF CONGRESS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 601(a) 

6 of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 

7 31) is repealed. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HR 134 IH

1 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

2 Section 601(a)(1) of such Act is amended— 

3 (1) by striking ‘‘(a)(1)’’ and inserting ‘‘(a)’’; 

4 (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), 

5 and (C) as paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), respectively; 

6 and 

7 (3) by striking ‘‘as adjusted by paragraph (2) 

8 of this subsection’’ and inserting ‘‘as from time to 

9 time adjusted by law’’. 

10 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall take effect 

11 on December 31, 2014. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NTLIncorporated (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),Stephen A. Burch, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and JacquesKerrest, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| /s/ STEPHEN  A. BURCH |                                             |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
| Name:                 | Stephen A. Burch                                 |   |
| Title:                | Chief Executive Officer, President and  Director |   |
| Date:                 | May 10, 2006                                |   |
| /s/ JACQUES KERREST   |                                             |
| Name:                 | Jacques Kerrest                                  |   |
| Title:                | Chief Financial Officer                          |   |
| Date:                 | May 10, 2006                                |   |

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Reportpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemedfiled by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934.

----
# L_2016097EN.01001201.xml

| 13.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 97/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 97/12

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING DECISION (CFSP) 2016/573

of 12 April 2016

implementing Decision 2013/183/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 31(2) thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2013/183/CFSP of 22 April 2013 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and repealing Decision 2010/800/CFSP (1), and in particular Article 19(1) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 April 2013, the Council adopted Decision 2013/183/CFSP. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 April 2013, the Council adopted Decision 2013/183/CFSP.

| (2) | On 21 March 2016, the United Nations Security Council Committee established pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolution 1718 (2006) deleted four vessels from the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 21 March 2016, the United Nations Security Council Committee established pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolution 1718 (2006) deleted four vessels from the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures.

| (3) | Annex I to Decision 2013/183/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex I to Decision 2013/183/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Annex I to Decision 2013/183/CFSP is amended as set out in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 12 April 2016.

For the Council

The President

A.G. KOENDERS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 111, 23.4.2013, p. 52.

1

---

ANNEX

The vessels with the IMO numbers listed below are deleted from the list set out in entry 20 of part B (Entities) of Annex I to Council Decision 2013/183/CFSP:

| (j) | JH 86 8602531 |
| --- | --- |

(j)

JH 86 8602531

| (l) | Jin Tal 9163154 |
| --- | --- |

(l)

Jin Tal 9163154

| (m) | Jin Teng 9163166 |
| --- | --- |

(m)

Jin Teng 9163166

| (dd) | Grand Karo 8511823 |
| --- | --- |

(dd)

Grand Karo 8511823

---
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion

filed December 21 , 2023.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 23

- 00754

- CV

IN RE ROMEO KISON , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 295th District Court Harri s Count y, Texas Tria l Court Cause No. 2019

- 23138



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

On October 13, 2023 , relator Romeo Kison filed a petition for writ of habeas

c orpus in this c ourt. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P.
52. In the petition, relat or ask s th is c ourt to compel the Honorable Donna Roth, presiding judge of the 295th District Court of Harris County
, to vacate: (1) the2

trial court’s October 9, 2023 order revoking suspension of sentence of contempt
and for Romeo Kison’s commitment to Har ris Cou nty Jail; and (2) the trial court’s October 13, 2023 order of commitment.
On December 12, 2023, relator filed a motion to dismiss

. In his motion,
relator advised this court that he ha s been released from incarceration and that this

procee din g should be d i smissed as moot. We dismiss relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus as moot.

P ER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Jewell, Spain, W ilson.
#### STATE v. HARRY BERMAN.1

July 9, 1909.

Nos. 16,241—(209).

Defendant was indicted in the district court for Hennepin county, with George Wright and Charles Washington, for taking from the Great Northern Railway Company twenty journal brasses with iron coverings, of the value of sixty dollars. He was convicted of pfetit larceny. From an order, Holt, J., denying his motion for a new trial, Harry Berman appealed.

Affirmed.

*George Harold Smith,*for appellant.

*George T. Simpson,*Attorney General, *Al. J. Smith,*County Attorney, and *John F. Bernhagen,*Assistant County Attorney, for the State.

1

 Reported in 122 N. W. 161.

Per Curiam.

The defendant was indicted for the crime of grand larceny and found guilty of petit larceny. On this appeal from an order denying a motion for a new trial, the appellant contends' that the evidence given by certain accomplices was insufficiently corroborated, and that the error in receiving certain" incompetent evi*535dence was not cured by the fact that it was subsequently stricken out and the jury instructed to wholly disregard the same. The corroborating evidence was sufficient, and, tested by the rule stated in State v. Towers, 106 Minn. 105, 118 N. W. 361, the error in receiving the incompetent evidence was, under all the circumstances, without prejudice.

Order affirmed.