alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOcean Facts

# What is bathymetry?

## Bathymetry is the study of the **"beds" or "floors" of water bodies**, including the ocean, rivers, streams, and lakes.

Bathymetry map of East Flower Garden Bank.  

The term "bathymetry" originally referred to the ocean's  depth relative to sea level, although it has come to mean “submarine  topography,” or the depths and shapes of underwater terrain.

In the same way that topographic maps represent the three-dimensional  features (or relief) of overland terrain, bathymetric maps illustrate the land  that lies underwater. Variations in sea-floor relief may be depicted by color  and contour lines called depth contours or isobaths.

Bathymetry is the foundation of the science of hydrography,  which measures the physical features of a water body.  Hydrography includes not only bathymetry, but  also the shape and features of the shoreline; the characteristics of tides,  currents, and waves; and the physical and chemical properties of the water  itself.

###### **Search** Our Facts

###### Get **Social**

###### More **Information**

          -  Office of Coast Survey
          -  Seafloor Mapping ,  NOS Education

**Last updated:**   01/20/23**Author:** NOAAHow to cite this article

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, CoreyHenry, certify that: 

1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and allreports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-2 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2.    Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.    Based on my knowledge, all of thedistribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4.    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of RegulationAB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 

5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included inthis report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells FargoBank, N.A. and Computershare Trust Company, N.A. 

 
By: 
/s/ Corey Henry
Name: Corey HenryTitle: 
President and Chief Executive Officer

SantanderDrive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor
 (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)Date: March 31, 2022**
LITTLE v. NASEKOS BLDG. CONTRACTORS, INC.

No. COA03-1371.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 1, 2005.

Certification Date March 21, 2005.

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed in part; vacated and remanded in part.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: APPOINTMENT TO

CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL

RULES COMMITTEE 

:

:

:

:

:

No. 453

CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL RULES 

DOCKET

 O R D E R

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 5

th day of September, 2014, Magisterial District Judge 

Blaise P. Larotonda, Allegheny County, is hereby appointed as a member of the 

Criminal Procedural Rules Committee for a term of three years commencing October 1, 

2014.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Decided January 23, 2006

Before

Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

Hon. ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

Hon. ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge

No. 03-4047

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

LELAND B. HALL,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Eastern District of

Wisconsin

No. 03 CR 2

Randolph T. Randa,

Chief Judge.

O R D E R

Leland Hall was sentenced for possessing a gun as a felon. On appeal, he

argued that the district court erred by sentencing him under the formerly

mandatory sentencing guidelines, see United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.

Ct. 738, 160 L. Ed. 2d 621 (2005). We ordered a limited remand, United States v.

Paladino, 401 F.3d 471, 484 (7th Cir. 2005), and the district court said that it would

have imposed the same sentence had it known that the guidelines were advisory.

That sentence was within a properly calculated guideline range and presumptively

reasonable, see United States v. Mykytiuk, 415 F.3d 606, 608 (7th Cir. 2005). Hall

has failed to make any argument that his sentence is unreasonable when measured

against the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. §3553(a). Id. at 607. Because Hall has not

rebutted the presumption that the sentence is reasonable, the judgment of the

district court is AFFIRMED.

UNPUBLISHED ORDER

Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53
STATE of North Carolina v. Terrence Lorenzo ROBINSON.

No. 262P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 9, 2004.

Elizabeth L. McKay, Special Deputy Attorney General, Edward R. Grannis, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

Sofie W. Hosford, for Robinson.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Attorney General on the 1st day of June 2004 for Writ of Supersedeas and Motion for Temporary Stay of the judgment of the Court of Appeals in this matter, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th day of June 2004."
JWR SALES CO. v. NEW MILLENIUM CINEMAS, L.L.C.

No. COA03-1672

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed January 18, 2005

Certification Date February 7, 2005

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
# C_2014135EN.01006101.xml

| 5.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 135/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 135/61

---

Order of the General Court of 20 February 2014 — USFSPEI and Loescher v Council

(Case T-119/12) (1)

1

2014/C 135/80

Language of the case: French

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 165, 9.6.2012.

1

---
**Exhibit 13.1**

** **

**Certification**

 

        Pursuantto section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United StatesCode), the undersigned officer of SkyePharma PLC, a company incorporated underthe laws of England and Wales (the “*Company*”),hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

        TheAnnual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005(the “*Report*”) of the Companyfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company. 

 
| Dated: June 30, 2006 |   | Frank Condella  Chief Executive Officer |
|---------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|

 

        Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant tosection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United StatesCode) as an exhibit to the Report.

 

----
IN THE MATTER OF: C.E.M.

No. COA04-114

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed February 01, 2005.

This case not for publication

Johnston County No. 02 J 154.

*Jennifer S. O'Connor, for Petitioner-Appellee Johnston County Department of Social Services.*

*Sofie W. Hosford, for Respondent-Appellant.*

STEELMAN, Judge.

C.E.M., a minor child, was born on 31 August 2002 in Johnston County. On that same date an order for non-secure custody was entered by the District Court of Johnson County under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-502 placing custody of C.E.M. with the Department of Social Services. A series of orders on the need for continued non- secure custody were entered by the court from September 2002 through January 2003. An adjudication hearing was scheduled on seven different occasions before it was held on 12 February 2003. Respondent was not present at any of the hearings on the continuation of the non-secure custody order after 18 September2002, and was not present at the adjudication hearing on 12 February 2003. At that hearing the court found C.E.M. to be neglected and dependent. Respondent mother appeals from the adjudication order.

Appeals in this type of juvenile proceeding are governed by the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-1001 (2004). This statute allows for the appeal of an order of disposition entered following an adjudication. It does not provide for the appeal of an order of adjudication. There being no right of appeal from the order of adjudication, this appeal must be dismissed. *In re A.L.,* ___ N.C. App. ___, ___, 601 S.E.2d 538, 538 (2004); *In re Laney,* 156 N.C. App. 639, 577 S.E.2d 377 (2003), *rev denied,* 357 N.C. 459, 585 S.E.2d 762, (2003).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Judges CALABRIA and GEER concur.

Report per Rule 30(e).
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 14

- 00425

- CV
Marissol Ochoa Sierra and Emilio Chapa Trevino v. City of Pharr
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 7 of Hidalgo County , Texas

Trial Cause No. CL

- 11

- 3927

- G

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPE ALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant s

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. May 21, 2015
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with this  Quarterly  Report of Modena 2 Inc. (the  "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I John Fitzpatrick,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to
the best of his knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ John Fitzpatrick
--------------------------
John Fitzpatrick
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer

March 15, 2004
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Merisant Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2005(the “Report”), the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/   Anthony  J. Nocchiero |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Anthony J. Nocchiero                  |
|   | Chief Financial Officer               |
|   | November 14, 2005                     |

 

----
Jurijus KADAMOVAS, Petitioner v. John F. CARAWAY, Warden, et al.

No. 19-6416

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
1

COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF I. K. AND E. K., 

CHILDREN, 

 

 Appellant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-22-00055-CV

Appeal from the

383rd District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2019DCM7783)

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court to determine whether to dismiss this appeal for want of 

jurisdiction. We will ABATE this appeal for fifteen days and withhold dismissal pending further 

inquiry.

The 383rd District Court signed a final judgment in this case dated February 1, 2022. 

Appellant filed his notice of appeal on April 1, 2022. Because the notice of appeal appeared to be 

untimely filed, we questioned our jurisdiction over this matter and directed Appellant to show 

cause why this case should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. In his response to the Court, 

Appellant averred that he did not receive notice of the trial court's February 1 judgment until 

March 11, 2022. As such, under Tex.R.Civ.P. 306a(4), the April 1 notice of appeal was timely 

because it was filed within 30 days of the date Appellant received actual notice of the trial 

court’s judgment.
2

In order to establish the date of actual notice of a judgment for purposes of the appellate 

timetables under Rule 306a(4), the party adversely affected is required to prove in the trial court, 

on sworn motion and notice, the date on which the party of his attorney either first received 

notice of the judgment or acquired actual knowledge of the signing. See Tex.R.Civ.P. 306a(5), 

Hanash v. Walter Antiques, Inc., 551 S.W.3d 920, 924-25 (Tex.App.--El Paso 2018, pet. denied). 

At this time, we do not have proof such a motion has been filed in the trial court or that the trial 

court has otherwise established the late notice date this Court should use, as is required by Rule 

306a(5).

Therefore, we ORDER this appeal to be abated for FIFTEEN DAYS to provide 

Appellant with the opportunity to either (1) show proof that the trial court has issued a Rule 

306a(5) order that designates the date of actual notice of judgment, or (2) file a proper Rule 

306a(5) motion with the trial court and provide this Court with proof such motion has been filed. 

Failure to provide these items to this Court before the abatement period ends may result in 

dismissal of this action without further notice to the parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of April, 2022.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox and Alley, JJ.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 1186** 

CECIL D . ADDISON , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. VOLVO TRUCKS OF NORTH AMERICA, INCORPORATED, a/k/a Volvo Group; IVAN MITCHELL; JOHN PENNINGTON; DAVID LILLY , Defend ants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke
. Samuel G. Wilson , District Judge. ( 7:09

- cv - 00088

- s gw - mfu )

Submitted : June 17, 2010 Decided: June 24, 2010

Before MOTZ and KING , C ircuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Cecil D. Addison, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Wilson Stoker, Eric Anthony Welter, WELTER LAW FIRM, PC, Herndon, Virginia, for Appellee s . Unpublished opinio ns are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Cecil D. Addison appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing his Title VII complaint for failure to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordi ngly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Addison v. Volvo Trucks of N . Am., Inc. , No. 7:09

- cv - 00088

- sgw - mfu (W.D. Va. Feb. 3, 2010) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in t he materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
# L_2016327EN.01007601.xml

| 2.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 327/76 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 327/76

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU, Euratom) 2016/2110

of 28 November 2016

appointing a member, proposed by the Hellenic Republic, of the European Economic and Social Committee

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 302 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Greek Government,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 18 September 2015 and 1 October 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU, Euratom) 2015/1600 (1) and (EU, Euratom) 2015/1790 (2) appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2015 to 20 September 2020. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 18 September 2015 and 1 October 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU, Euratom) 2015/1600 (1) and (EU, Euratom) 2015/1790 (2) appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2015 to 20 September 2020.

| (2) | A member's seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Ms Aikaterini PEPPA, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member's seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Ms Aikaterini PEPPA,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Constantine CATSAMBIS, Ambassador ad. h., Union of Greek Shipowners (UGS) external advisor on European Affairs, is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 20 September 2020.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 28 November 2016.

For the Council

The President

P. ŽIGA

---

(1)  Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2015/1600 of 18 September 2015 appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2015 to 20 September 2020 (OJ L 248, 24.9.2015, p. 53).

1

(2)  Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2015/1790 of 1 October 2015 appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2015 to 20 September 2020 (OJ L 260, 7.10.2015, p. 23).

2

---
Hernan NAVARRO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6961

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

PHARMACOPEIA, INC.

 

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Pharmacopeia, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, LeslieJ. Browne, Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, herebycertify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| By:    | /s/ Leslie J.  Browne, Ph.D.                     |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Leslie J. Brown,  Ph.D.                          |
|   | President, Chief  Executive Officer and Director |
|   | (Principal  Executive Officer)                   |
|   | November 5, 2007                                 |

 

----
Kurtis D. WORLEY, Petitioner v. ILLINOIS.

No. 18-9162

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District denied.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 VIASPACE INC.
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of VIASPACE Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: August 10, 2007
    /s/ STEPHEN J. MUZIStephen J. MuziChief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, theundersigned Chief Executive Officer of GrayMark Productions, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSBof the Company for the nine months ended March 31, 2005 (the “QuarterlyReport”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in theQuarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: May 9,  2005 | /s/  JOHN SIMONELLI      |
|------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                         | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----