alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000797480
<NAME> SMITH BARNEY SECTOR SERIES
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER>005
   <NAME>SMITH BARNEY GLOBAL BIOTECHNOLOGY FUND

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              2 Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 OCT-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                      OCT-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>             40,640,436
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>            35,999,917
<RECEIVABLES>                        475,175
<ASSETS-OTHER>                             0
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                     960
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    36,476,052
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>             398,478
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                    0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                  0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                  398,478
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                            0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>          40,667,354
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>              1,186,672
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                      0
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                  0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>               (75,412)
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                2,095
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                   0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>          (4,640,521)
<NET-ASSETS>                      35,953,516
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                          0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                     42,740
<OTHER-INCOME>                             0
<EXPENSES-NET>                       118,152
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>              (75,412)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>               2,095
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>         (4,640,521)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>             (4,713,838)
<EQUALIZATION>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                  0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                   0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                      0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>           41,165,480
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>         (498,126)
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                        0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>            35,953,516
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                    0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                  0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                    0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                 0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                 53,492
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                      206,348
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>              11,000,391
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                  11.40
<PER-SHARE-NII>                        (0.02)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                 0.00
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                    0.00
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>               0.00
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                    0.00
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                     9.86
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                         2.25
[AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING]                     0
[AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE]                       0



</TABLE>
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
                                   FORM 10-K/A
(Mark One)
         X  Annual Report under Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange 
            Act of 1934

   For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997

           Transition report under Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities 
           Exchange Act of 1934 (No fee required)

         For the transition period from __________ to __________

         Commission file number 0-22325

                          ALYDAAR SOFTWARE CORPORATION
                 (Name of Small Business Issuer in its Charter)

             North Carolina                                87-0399301
    (State of Other Jurisdiction of                     (I.R.S. Employer
     Incorporation or Organization)                     Identification No.)

  2101 W. Rexford Road, Charlotte, North Carolina            28211
   (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                (Zip Code)

                                 (704) 365-2324
                (Issuer's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

        Securities registered under Section 12 (g) of the Exchange Act:

                                  Common Stock
                                (Title of Class)

         Check whether the issuer: (1) filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the  Exchange  Act during the past 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the  registrant was required to file such reports),  and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for past 90 days.
Yes    X      No_____

         Check if there is no  disclosure  of  delinquent  filers in response to
Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained in this form, and no disclosure will
be contained,  to the best of  registrant's  knowledge,  in definitive  proxy or
information  statements  incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  X

         State  the  aggregate   market  value  of  the  voting  stock  held  by
non-affiliates  computed by  reference to the price at which the stock was sold,
or the average bid and asked prices of such stock, as of a specified date within
the past 60 days. $173,952,160 as of March 30, 1998.

Documents Incorporated by Reference:  See Footnotes to Exhibits


<PAGE>

                                    SIGNATURE

                  Pursuant  to the  requirements  of  Section  13 or 15(d),  the
Registrant  has duly  caused  this  Amendment  to Form  10-K to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                  ALYDAAR SOFTWARE CORPORATION

                                  By: /s/ Robert F. Gruder
                                      Robert F. Gruder, Chief Executive Officer,
                                         President and Chairman

Dated:  September 23, 1998



<PAGE>


                                INDEX TO EXHIBITS


   
10.8     Subcontractor Agreement between Alydaar and Compuware Corporation*
    

------------------
         * Filed herewith
Thomas SANDER, Petitioner, v. CITY OF DICKINSON, NORTH DAKOTA, et al.

No. 19-662

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1306 

To provide for the partial settlement of certain claims under the Alaska 

Native Claims Settlement Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 20, 2013 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide for the partial settlement of certain claims under 

the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Southeast Alaska Na5 tive Land Conveyance Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) MAPS.—The term ‘‘maps’’ means the maps 

9 entitled ‘‘Sealaska Land Entitlement Finalization’’, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1306 IH

1 numbered 5 and 9 of 17, and dated October 17, 

2 2012. 

3 (2) SEALASKA.—The term ‘‘Sealaska’’ means 

4 the Sealaska Corporation, a Regional Native Cor5 poration established under the Alaska Native Claims 

6 Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.). 

7 (3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

8 the Secretary of the Interior. 

9 (4) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ means the State 

10 of Alaska. 

11 SEC. 3. SOUTHEAST ALASKA PARTIAL NATIVE LAND CON12 VEYANCE. 

13 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 60 days after the 

14 date of enactment of this Act and subject to valid existing 

15 rights and subsection (b), the Secretary shall convey to 

16 Sealaska the 2 parcels of Federal land comprising approxi17 mately 3,380 acres, as generally depicted on the maps, in 

18 partial fulfillment of the remaining land entitlement of 

19 Sealaska under section 14(h)(8) of the Alaska Native 

20 Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1613(h)(8)). 

21 (b) PUBLIC EASEMENTS.—The conveyance under 

22 subsection (a) shall be subject to the condition that the 

23 Secretary identify and reserve, by the date that is 2 years 

24 after the date of enactment of this Act, public easements 

25 under section 17(b) of the Alaska Native Claims SettleVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:56 Mar 26, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1306.IH H1306

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1306 IH

1 ment Act (43 U.S.C. 1616(b); 85 Stat. 708) with respect 

2 to the Federal land conveyed under subsection (a). 

3 (c) TREATMENT OF LAND CONVEYED.—The Federal 

4 land conveyed to Sealaska under subsection (a) shall be 

5 considered to be land conveyed by the Secretary under sec6 tion 14(h)(8) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act 

7 (43 U.S.C. 1613(h)(8)). 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Independent Auditors' Report


To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Smith Barney Investment Funds Inc.:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements
of the Smith Barney Small Cap Value Fund of Smith Barney
Investment Funds Inc. (the Fund) for the year ended September 30,
2001, we considered its internal control, including control
activities for safeguarding securities, in order to determine our
auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on
the financial statements and to comply with the requirements of
Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on the internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles. Those controls include the safeguarding of
assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or
fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any
evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to
the risk that it may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in the internal control that might be
material weaknesses under standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness
is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of
the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively
low level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in
amounts that would be material in relation to the financial
statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a
timely period by employees in the normal course of performing
their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters involving
the internal control and its operation, including controls for
safeguarding securities that we consider to be material
weaknesses as defined above.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management, the Board of Directors of the Fund, and the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not intended to be and
should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.



New York, New York
November 13, 2001
Independent Auditors' Consent



To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
Travelers Series Fund Inc.:

We consent to the use of our reports dated December 18, 1997 for Smith 
Barney Income and Growth Portfolio, Alliance Growth Portfolio, AIM 
Capital Appreciation Portfolio, Van Kampen American Capital Enterprise 
Portfolio, Smith Barney International Equity Portfolio, Smith Barney 
Pacific Basin Portfolio, TBC Managed Income Portfolio, Putnam 
Diversified Income Portfolio, GT Global Strategic Income Portfolio, 
Smith Barney High Income Portfolio, MFS Total Return Portfolio and 
Smith Barney Money Market Portfolio of Travelers Series Fund Inc. 
incorporated herein by reference and to the references to our Firm 
under the headings "Financial Highlights" in the Prospectus and 
"Independent Auditors" in the Statement of Additional Information.
 



	KPMG Peat Marwick 
LLP


New York, New York
February 26, 1998
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133295 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133295 

 COA: 274849 

Genesee CC: 06-018000-FC 

DENNIS WAYNE VAN CLEVE, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 18, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Genesee County 

Prosecuting Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after 

the date of this order. 

The application for leave to appeal remains pending. 

l0723 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 30, 2007 

 Clerk
# C_2016212EN.01000301.xml

| 14.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/3

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 9 June 2016

appointing a member and an alternate member of the Advisory Committee for the Coordination of Social Security Systems for Slovakia

(2016/C 212/04)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems (1), and in particular Article 75 thereof,

1

Having regard to the lists of candidates submitted to the Council by the Governments of the Member States,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decision of 13 October 2015 (2), the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee for the Coordination of Social Security Systems for the period from 20 October 2015 to 19 October 2020. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decision of 13 October 2015 (2), the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee for the Coordination of Social Security Systems for the period from 20 October 2015 to 19 October 2020.

2

| (2) | The Government of Slovakia has submitted further nominations for two posts to be filled, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Government of Slovakia has submitted further nominations for two posts to be filled,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed member and alternate member of the Advisory Committee for the Coordination of Social Security Systems for the period from 20 October 2015 to 19 October 2020:

I.   REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYERS' ORGANISATIONS

| Country | Member | Alternate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Slovakia | Ms Miriam ŠPÁNIKOVÁ | Mr Peter MOLNÁR |

Country

Member

Alternate

Slovakia

Ms Miriam ŠPÁNIKOVÁ

Mr Peter MOLNÁR

Article 2

The Council will appoint the members and the alternate members who have not yet been nominated at a later date.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 9 June 2016.

For the Council

The President

G.A. VAN DER STEUR

---

(1)  OJ L 166, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

1

(2)  Council Decision of 13 October 2015 appointing the members and alternates of the Advisory Committee for the Coordination of Social Security Systems (OJ C 341, 16.10.2015, p. 4).

2

---
TARRANT v. FREEWAY FOODS, et al.

No. 219P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 21, 2004.

John W. Ormand, III, Charles E. Coble, Raleigh, for Freeway Foods.

Faith Herndon, for Tarrant.

John W. Gresham, Charlotte, for Academy of Trial Lawyers.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th day of June 2004 by Capital Associated Industries, Inc. Piedmont Associated Industries, Inc., The Employer's Association, Inc. and Western Carolina Industries, Inc. for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

> "Motion Dismissed as moot. By order of the Court in conference this the 21st day of June 2004."
|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as                of the                dates presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company                for                the periods presented. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                           |                                                                 |                         |
|--------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|
| November              16, 2006 |                                                            | /s/              Sandra Batt |
|                           | Sandra                  BattChief                  Financial Officer |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       9,292,800
<SECURITIES>                                 4,997,787
<RECEIVABLES>                                  126,692
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               427,236
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,844,515
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          444,089
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,400,426
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,844,515
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               262,729
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  119,434
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                143,295
<INCOME-TAX>                                   143,295
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            143,295
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   143,295
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2012138EN.01000301.xml

| 12.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/3

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative (Luxembourg) lodged on 20 February 2012 — Adzo Domenyo Alopka, Jarel Mondoulou, Eja Mondoulou v Ministre du Travail, de l’Emploi et de l’Immigration

(Case C-86/12)

(2012/C 138/04)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour administrative (Luxembourg)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Adzo Domenyo Alopka, Jarel Mondoulou, Eja Mondoulou

Defendant: Ministre du Travail, de l’Emploi et de l’Immigration

Questions referred

Is Article 20 TFEU — if necessary, read in conjunction with Articles 20, 21, 24, 33 and 34 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, or with one or more of those provisions read separately or in conjunction — to be interpreted as precluding a Member State from refusing a third-country national, with sole responsibility for his or her infants who are citizens of the European Union, residence in the Member State of residence of the children, where they have been living with that person since birth, without having that nationality, while refusing the third-country national a residence permit, or even a work permit?

Are such decisions to be regarded as being in the nature of decisions depriving those children, in their country of residence, in which they have lived since birth, of effective enjoyment of the substance of the rights attaching to the status of citizen of the European Union also in the situation where their other direct ascendant, with whom they have never shared family life, is resident in another Member State of the European Union, of which that person is a national?

---