alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 107/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 107 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6126 April 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 107

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6126 April 2018

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Decision (EU) 2018/628 of 11 November 2016 on State aid SA.24221(2011/C) (ex 2011/NN) implemented by Austria for the Klagenfurt airport, Ryanair and other airlines using the airport
  (notified under document C(2016) 7131)

   (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Decision (EU) 2018/628 of 11 November 2016 on State aid SA.24221(2011/C) (ex 2011/NN) implemented by Austria for the Klagenfurt airport, Ryanair and other airlines using the airport
  (notified under document C(2016) 7131)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2016) 7131)

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-10295 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. TOMAS GARCIA GOMEZ, Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court f or the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 7:11-CR-8-1
Before JONES, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal P ublic Defender appointed to represent Tomas Garcia Gomez (Garcia) has moved f

or leave to withdraw a nd has f iled briefs in a ccordance with Anders v. C

alifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United S tates v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garcia has not filed a response. We h ave r eviewed c ounsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected t h erein. We concur with

c o u n s e l ’ s a s s e s s m e n t that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellat e review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave t o withdraw is GRANTED, U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June 18, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R
. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R
. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 12-10295 Document: 00512277264 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2013No. 12-10295

counsel is excused from further responsibilities he r e i n, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 12-10295 Document: 00512277264 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/18/2013
Independent Auditors' Report


To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Smith Barney Sector Series Inc.:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements
of the Smith Barney Financial Services Fund of Smith Barney
Sector Series Inc. (Fund) for the year ended October 31, 2002, we
considered its internal control, including control activities for
safeguarding securities, in order to determine our auditing
procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the
financial statements and to comply with the requirements of Form
N-SAR, not to provide assurance on internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Those controls include the safeguarding of assets against
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, error or
fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any
evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to
the risk that it may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in internal control that might be material
weaknesses under standards established by the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness is a
condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the
internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low
level the risk that errors or fraud in amounts that would be
material in relation to the financial statements being audited
may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees
in the normal course of performing their assigned functions.
However, we noted no matters involving internal control and its
operation, including controls for safeguarding securities that we
consider to be material weaknesses as defined above as of October
31, 2002.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management and the Board of Directors of the Fund and the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not intended to be and
should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.


                                                  KPMG LLP

New York, New York
December 11, 2002
Hitoshi OMBE, Petitioner, v. Susana MARTINEZ, et al.;

No. 18-9247

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

The petition for rehearing is denied.
# CA2006141EN.01000101.xml

| 16.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 141/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 141/1

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Image

---
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Dollar  Financial  Corp.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Jeffrey A. Weiss
----------------------------------
Jeffrey A. Weiss
Chairman of the Board of Directors
and Chief Executive Officer
February 11, 20045
# C_2021016EN.01000201.xml

| 15.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/2

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions at the meeting on 19 February 2020 concerning a draft decision in Case AT.40335 – Romanian gas interconnectors

Rapporteur: Italy

(2021/C 16/02)

(1)

The Advisory Committee (9 Member States) shares the Commission’s concerns expressed in its draft Decision under Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

(2)

The Advisory Committee (9 Member States) agrees with the Commission that the proceedings can be concluded by means of a decision pursuant to Article 9(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003, as described in the draft Decision.

(3)

The Advisory Committee (9 Member States) agrees with the Commission that the offered commitments are suitable, necessary and proportionate and should be made legally binding, as set out in the draft Decision.

(4)

The Advisory Committee (9 Member States) agrees with the Commission’s draft Decision that, in light of the offered commitments, there are no longer grounds for action by the Commission, without prejudice to Article 9(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003.

(5)

The Advisory Committee (9 Member States) recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

---
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated March 16, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements of L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc. (formerly Viisage Technology, Inc.) (the ‘‘Company’’) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 into the Company’s Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-143068, 333-28695, 333-42485, 333-36734, 333-65312, 333-65314, 333-65316, 333-120156, 333-137004, 333-137808 and 333-139672) and Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-146696 and 333-145069).

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
February 26, 2008

---
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of T Bancshares, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Patrick G.
Adams, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Ken Bramlage, as Vice
President and Controller of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




T
      BANCSHARES, INC.Date:
      May 17, 2010
                  By:
                  /s/ Patrick G. AdamsPatrick
      G. AdamsChief
      Executive OfficerPrincipal
      Executive OfficerActing
      Co-Principal Financial OfficerDate:
      May 17, 2010
                  By:
                  /s/ Ken BramlageKen
      BramlageVice
      President and ControllerActing
      Co-Principal Financial
Officer
U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
				Here's how you know we're official. **Official websites use .gov** A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure websites use HTTPS** A small lock or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to a .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Toggle navigation Toggle search National Ocean Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
 Search
					Search National Ocean Service


Home
				Ocean Facts

				Topics
					Explore All Topics 
                        Arctic 
                        Careers 
                        Economy 
                        Ecosystems 
                        Geodesy 
                        Hazards 
                        International
                        Navigation 
                        Observations 
                        Ocean 
                        Recreation 
                         Sea Level Rise 
                        Story Maps 
                        Tools
                
                			Education

				
				News
				Podcasts
				Video
				Images
				About Us


1. Home
2. Facts
3. What is a national marine sanctuary?

**What is a national marine sanctuary?**  National marine sanctuaries are **protected waters** that include habitats such as rocky reefs, kelp forests, deep-sea canyons, and  underwater archaeological sites. Humpback whales feeding in the Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary*Humpback whales feeding in the Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary, located off the northern and central California coast.* Within their protected waters, giant humpback whales breed and calve their young, temperate reefs flourish, and shipwrecks tell stories of our maritime history. Similar to national parks on the land, these underwater preserves provide a safe habitat for species close to extinction or protect historically significant shipwrecks. Each sanctuary site is a unique place needing special protections. Marine sanctuaries are natural classrooms, cherished recreational spots, and valuable commercial industries. They form part of a larger network called the National Marine Sanctuary System, which consists of protected areas that encompass marine and Great Lakes waters from Washington State to the Florida Keys, and from Lake Huron to American Samoa.
 More **Information** Office of National Marine Sanctuaries   Get **Social** Social
  **Last updated:** 04/11/23 **Author:** NOAA How to cite this article Contact Us


Feedback Provide Feedback
							Contact Us
							Report an error
 Social Instagram Logo/a>


*Science. Service.Stewardship.*
 About NOS About Us
							NOS Program Offices
							Media Inquiries
							Website Acknowledgements
                            Site Index
							Disclaimer
 More Resources Freedom of Information Act
							Accessibility
							Information Quality
							Privacy Policy
							NOS For Employees
							USA.gov
 Department of Commerce
									National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
									National Ocean Service
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PENNSYLVANIA, Bucks County, et al., Petitioners, v. Jason PIASECKI.

No. 18-1490

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
1. Home
2. Facts
3. What types of plants and animals live in an estuary?

**What types of plants and animals live in an estuary?**  Estuaries, one of the **most productive ecosystems in the world**, are home to a diverse population of animals and plants. Great Blue Heron eating a fish in an estuary. (NOAA News)*Great Blue Heron eating a fish in an estuary. (NOAA News)* **Otter Cam!** *The Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve in California is home to a population of more than 100 sea otters. See for yourself! Visit Elkhorn Slough's real-time Otter Cam.*
 Estuaries — areas where fresh and saltwater mix — are  made up of  many different types of habitats. These habitats can include oyster reefs,  coral reefs, rocky shores, submerged aquatic vegetation, marshes, and  mangroves. There are also different animals that live in each of these different habitats. Fish, shellfish, and migratory birds are just a few of the  animals that can live in an estuary. The Chesapeake Bay, as one example, includes several different habitats. There are oyster reefs where oysters, mud crabs, and small fish  may be found. Also in the Bay, there is submerged aquatic vegetation where seahorses, blue crabs, and other fish live. Finally, there is open water where sea turtles or rays can be found.
  More **Information** Life in an Estuary Estuaries (audio podcast) National Estuarine Research Reserve System Estuaries, NOS Education   Get **Social** Social
  **Last updated:** 08/24/23 **Author:** NOAA How to cite this article Contact Us


Feedback Provide Feedback
							Contact Us
							Report an error
 Social Instagram Logo/a>


*Science. Service.Stewardship.*
 About NOS About Us
							NOS Program Offices
							Media Inquiries
							Website Acknowledgements
                            Site Index
							Disclaimer
 More Resources Freedom of Information Act
							Accessibility
							Information Quality
							Privacy Policy
							NOS For Employees
							USA.gov
 Department of Commerce
									National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
									National Ocean Service
**Exhibit 32.1** **Certification    of CEO and CFO Pursuant to****18 U.S.C. Section 1350,****as Adopted Pursuant to****Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report on    Form 10-Q    of GNC Corporation (the “Company”), for the quarterly    period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and    Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),    Joseph M. Fortunato, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company,    and Curtis J. Larrimer, as Chief Financial Officer of the    Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,    as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley    Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company. /s/  Joseph    M. Fortunato    Name: Joseph M. Fortunato     Title:     Chief Executive Officer    Date: August 4, 2006 /s/  Curtis    J. Larrimer    Name: Curtis J. Larrimer     Title:     Chief Financial Officer    Date: August 4, 2006     This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906    of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the    extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed    filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# STATEOFLOUISIANA

COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS TYLER JUDSON NO. 2022 KW 0152



### MAY 9, 2022

In Re: State of Louisana, applying for supervisory writs,

19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 

### DC -20-02965.

BEFORE: GUIDRY! HOLDRIDGE, AND CHUTZ, JJ.

WRIT GRANTED. When a district court finds, even after sentencing, 

## that a plea of guilty is constitutionally infirm, it retains the 

### authority to vacate the sentence and set aside the plea. State v. Allah, 2017-0785 ( La. 1/ 9/ 18), 232 

### So.3d 554 per curiam) ( citing State v. Lewis, 421 So.2d 

### 224, 226 ( La. 

### 1982)). 

## A constitutionally infirm guiltyplea may be set aside 

## either bymeans of an appeal or postconviction relief. State v. Dixon, 

### 449 

### So.2d 463, 464 ( La. 1984); State v. 

### Young, 2020-0049 La. 

### App. 1st Cir. 11/6/20), 

### 315 So. 3d 904, 907, writ denied, 2020-01402 ( La. 

### 2/9/21), 310 

### So.3d 177. In order to 

### properly exercise its discretion and in order for the appellate court to review the exercise of that discretion, the trial court should 

## conduct a hearing or inquiryon defendant's motiontowithdrawa guilty plea. State v. McGarr, 52, 641 ( La. 

### App. 2d Cir. 4/ 10/ 19), 

### 268 So.3d 1189, 1197 ( 

### citing Lewis, 421 So.2d at 225).

The oral 

## requesttowithdrawthe guiltypleawas improperly granted where the record does not show the district court received sworn 

### testimony or evidence regarding defendant' s request to withdraw his 

### guilty plea in this case. 

### Accordingly, the district court' s 

### ruling granting the motion to withdraw the guilty plea is vacated, and this matter 

### is remanded to the district court. On remand, the district court should first ascertain whether defendant — 

## bearing in mind that he may 

### nonetheless be eligible for expungement 

### in the future —desires to withdraw his 

### guilty plea. If he so wishes, only then should the 

### district court hold a contradictory 

## hearing to 

### determine whether the plea 

### is constitutionally infirm and decide whether the plea was induced 

### by what defendant 

## justifiably believed to be a plea 

### bargain but which, as a matter of law, could not be kept. Allah, 

### 232 So. 3d at 554; Dixon, 449 So.2d at 464. JMG GH WRC COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4979 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on an ultraviolet dye. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 15, 2008 

Mr. RAMSTAD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on an ultraviolet 

dye. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AN ULTRAVIOLET DYE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.28.19 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 an ultraviolet dye) is amended by striking the date in the 

7 effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4979 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
# L_2016039EN.01004701.xml

| 16.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 39/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 39/47

---

COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2016/208

of 15 February 2016

amending Decision (CFSP) 2015/260 extending the mandate of the European Union Special Representative for Human Rights

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 31(2) and Article 33 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 25 July 2012, the Council adopted Decision 2012/440/CFSP (1) appointing Mr Stavros LAMBRINIDIS as the European Union Special Representative (EUSR) for Human Rights. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 25 July 2012, the Council adopted Decision 2012/440/CFSP (1) appointing Mr Stavros LAMBRINIDIS as the European Union Special Representative (EUSR) for Human Rights.

| (2) | On 17 February 2015, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2015/260 (2) extending the mandate of the EUSR until 28 February 2017. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 17 February 2015, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2015/260 (2) extending the mandate of the EUSR until 28 February 2017.

| (3) | Decision (CFSP) 2015/260 sets out the financial reference amount intended to cover the period from 1 March 2015 to 29 February 2016. A new financial reference amount should be established for the period from 1 March 2016 to 28 February 2017. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Decision (CFSP) 2015/260 sets out the financial reference amount intended to cover the period from 1 March 2015 to 29 February 2016. A new financial reference amount should be established for the period from 1 March 2016 to 28 February 2017.

| (4) | Decision (CFSP) 2015/260 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Decision (CFSP) 2015/260 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In Article 5 of Decision (CFSP) 2015/260, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following:

‘2.   The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to the mandate of the EUSR from 1 March 2016 to 28 February 2017 shall be EUR 825 000.’.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 15 February 2016.

For the Council

The President

F. MOGHERINI

---

(1)  Council Decision 2012/440/CFSP of 25 July 2012 appointing the European Union Special Representative for Human Rights (OJ L 200, 27.7.2012, p. 21).

1

(2)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/260 of 17 February 2015 extending the mandate of the European Union Special Representative for Human Rights (OJ L 43, 18.2.2015, p. 29).

2

---