alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Hydrogen  Engine Center,  Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Theodore G. Hollinger,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

              (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section
                   13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

              (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in
                   all material respects,  the consolidated  financial condition
                   of the  Company as of the dates  presented  and  consolidated
                   results  of   operations  of  the  Company  for  the  periods
                   presented.

  August 14, 2006                            /s/ Theodore G. Hollinger
                                             -------------------------------
                                             Theodore G. Hollinger,
                                             Chief Executive Officer



This  certification  has been furnished  solely  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
[ARTICLE] 6
[CIK] 0000764624
[NAME] PREMIUM TOTAL RETURN - CLASS A
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   YEAR
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1999
[PERIOD-END]                               DEC-31-1999
[INVESTMENTS-AT-COST]                    2,249,828,328
[INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE]                   2,545,540,829
[RECEIVABLES]                              202,999,800
[ASSETS-OTHER]                                   7,138
[OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS]                                 0
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                           2,748,547,767
[PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES]                    38,935,160
[SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT]                              0
[OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES]                  164,716,707
[TOTAL-LIABILITIES]                        203,651,867
[SENIOR-EQUITY]                                      0
[PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON]                 2,090,115,757
[SHARES-COMMON-STOCK]                       36,933,643
[SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR]                       41,925,589
[ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT]                    7,790,038
[OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII]                               0
[ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS]                    150,069,581
[OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS]                             0
[ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC]                   269,920,524
[NET-ASSETS]                             2,544,895,900
[DIVIDEND-INCOME]                           52,405,887
[INTEREST-INCOME]                           69,371,534
[OTHER-INCOME]                                       0
[EXPENSES-NET]                              49,312,417
[NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME]                     72,465,004
[REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT]                   742,214,274
[APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT]                (693,844,806)
[NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS]                      121,032,472
[EQUALIZATION]                                       0
[DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME]                   18,158,878
[DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS]                   130,468,784
[DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER]                                0
[NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD]                      5,576,417
[NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED]                 17,182,305
[SHARES-REINVESTED]                          6,613,942
[NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS]                 (1,672,467,200)
[ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR]                      3,257,921
[ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR]                   73,920,269
[OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR]                              0
[OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR]                           0
[GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES]                       24,858,896
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                   0
[GROSS-EXPENSE]                             49,312,417
[AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS]                       765,654,853
[PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN]                            21.38
[PER-SHARE-NII]                                   0.54
[PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC]                           0.50
[PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND]                              0.49
[PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS]                         3.86
[RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL]                              0.00
[PER-SHARE-NAV-END]                              18.07
[EXPENSE-RATIO]                                   1.12
</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CFO PURSUANT TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NorthStar Realty Finance
      Corp. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      Andrew C. Richardson, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
      knowledge:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




Date: August
              9, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Andrew C. RichardsonAndrew
              C. RichardsonChief
                Financial Officer




This
      certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
      by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff upon request.
NO. 07-08-0221-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL B

	JUNE 6, 2008

	______________________________

	BARRY DWAYNE MINNFEE, 

									Appellant

	v.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

									Appellee

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 251ST DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

	NO. 43,519-C; HON. ANA ESTEVEZ, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

	Barry Dwayne Minnfee attempts to appeal his conviction of burglary of a habitation.  Sentence was imposed on January 28, 2002.  However, notice of appeal was not filed until  May 16, 2008.  We dismiss for want of jurisdiction.  

	To be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the sentence is imposed or suspended in open court or within 90 days after that date if a motion for new trial is filed.  Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a).  Appellant’s notice of appeal was clearly filed after the appropriate deadline.   

	A timely filed notice of appeal is essential to invoke our appellate jurisdiction.  Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).  If it is untimely, we can take no action other than to dismiss the proceeding.  Id. at 523.  Appellant’s notice being untimely filed, we have no jurisdiction over the matter and dismiss the appeal.

	Accordingly, appellant’s appeal is dismissed.1

							Brian Quinn 

						          Chief Justice

Do not publish.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court

Robert L. Cullen, Andrew A. Corriveau and Andrea Hucks, Petitioners,

v.

J. Bennett McNeal, B. McN eal Partnership, L.P., Anthony R. Porter and Wright's Point Home Owners Association, Respondents.

Appellate Case No. 2011-196126

ON WRI T OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

Appeal From Beaufort County The Honorable Carmen T. Mullen, Circuit Court Judge

Opinion No. 27489 Heard January 15, 2015 – Filed January 28, 2015

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED

John E. North, Jr., of North & Black, PC, of Beaufort, for Petitioners.

Joel D. Bailey, of The Bailey Law Firm, PA, of Beaufort, for Respondents.PER CURIAM: We granted a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals' decision in Cullen v. McNeal , 390 S.C. 470, 702 S.E.2d 378 (Ct. App. 2010). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED

. TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEAT TY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ.,

concur.
JPG, INC. v. DICK BECK PROFESSIONAL MARKETING, INC.

No. 530P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 2, 2004.

Michael S. Harrell, Raleigh, for JPG, Inc.

Jack L. Cozort, R. Bruce Thompson, II, Raleigh, for Dick Beck Professional Marketing

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 12th day of October 2004 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of December 2004."
(logo) Rialto

CAPITAL

 

 

**2018 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item1123)**

** **

** **

Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement") dated asof August 1, 2018 by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation asDepositor, KeyBank; National Association as Master Servicer and Westside NYC Multifamily Portfolio SpecialServicer, RialtoCapital Advisors, LLC as General Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association asTrustee, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and ParkBridge Lender Services LLC as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer relating to the CD 2018-CD7Mortgage Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,Series 2018-CD7 **(CD****2018-CD7)** 

 

 

The undersigned, a dulyauthorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the"Special Servicer") herein certifies to the following:

 

1.       All servicing activities and performance ofsuch servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement areperformed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

2.       A review of the servicing activities andperformance by the Special Servicer for the period of August 24, 2018 toDecember 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with the Pooling andServicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.

 

3.       To the best of my knowledge, based on suchreview, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theterms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for theReporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any suchobligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and statusthereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

Certifiedby: /s/ Adam Singer

AdamSinger, Managing Director 

 

Date:March 1, 2019
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, John R. Miller, certify that: 

     1. I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Beef Packing Company,LLC; 

     2. Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

     3. Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

     4. The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

     a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

     b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and 

     c)disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

     5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

     a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

     b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting. 

|                   |   |                                    |
|------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
| By:                    |   | /s/ John R. Miller                      |
|  

 

  |   |                                    |
|                   |   | John R. Miller*Chief Executive Officer* |

Date: January 8, 2008
Cherry 

Nev. 450, 458-59, 168 P.3d 1055, 1061-62(2007); Pearson v. Callahan, 555 

U.S. 223, 232, 236 (2009) (recognizing that a plaintiff must satisfy these 

two elements but that a reviewing court may address the second element 

first). 

On appeal, appellant argues that the district court erred in 

granting dismissal by applying a two-step test for qualified immunity 

because a reasonable person would have known that the conduct in 

question violated appellant's rights. We perceive no error in the district 

court's analysis, as the district court correctly determined that appellant's 

allegations, even if accepted as true, failed to demonstrate that 

respondents violated his constitutional rights, much less that appellant 

had clearly established constitutional rights that were violated. 1 Buzz 

Stew, 124 Nev. at 228, 181 P.3d at 672; Pearson, 555 U.S. at 232, 236; see 

Davis v. Scherer, 468 U.S. 183, 197 (1984) (concluding that a § 1983 

plaintiff bears the burden of overcoming the defendant's qualified 

immunity by showing that his constitutional rights were clearly 

established). We therefore conclude that the district court did not err in 

finding that qualified immunity applied. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

Hardesty 

, J. 

Douglas 

'In reaching this conclusion, we have given individual consideration 

to each of appellant's claims. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A 
cc: Hon. Richard Wagner, District Judge 

James Anthony Davis 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Pershing County Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 3 

(0) 1947A e
IN RE R.C. "Rick" LUSSY, Petitioner;

No. 19-481

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
# Official Journal C 23/18 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 23 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6218 January 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 23

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6218 January 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 23/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 23/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```
 
 
WHEAT-HRSpring - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                          Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 10/14/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       65,350
COMMITMENTS
  16,005    8,373    5,045   34,570   40,541   55,620   53,959    9,730   11,391

CHANGES FROM 10/07/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -907)
    -791     -311     -113    1,531    1,025      627      601   -1,534   -1,508

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    24.5     12.8      7.7     52.9     62.0     85.1     82.6     14.9     17.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       95)
      20       15       15       46       39       75       64
```

----

Updated October 17, 2014
STATE of North Carolina v. Billy Lee McNAIR.

No. 229P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 24, 2004.

Margaret Creasy Ciardella, Wrightsville Beach, for Billy Lee McNair.

K.D. Sturgis, Assistant Attorney General, Mitchell D. Norton, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 12th day of May 2004 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 12th day of May 2004 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."
Kenneth Michael SMITH, petitioner, v. Melissa Sue SMITH, nka Melissa Sue Graham.

No. 19-6507

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Montana denied.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002), I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of GrayMark Productions, Inc.(the “Company”), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, theQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the six months ended June30, 2006 (the “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and thatinformation contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  August 11, 2006 |   | /s/ JOHN  SIMONELLI      |
|------------------------|--------|--------------------------|
|                   |   | Chief Executive  Officer |

 

 

----
J. G., BY AND THROUGH his Parents, Howard GREENBERG, et ux., Petitioner v. HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, et al.

No. 19-658

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     I, Erin E. West, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of ProCentury Corporation (the“Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2006 whichthis certification accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Erin E. West     Erin E. West  Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer  August 7, 2006  
41
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4762 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4762

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on self contained, carafe-
         less automatic drip coffeemaker with electronic clock.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 17, 2007

Mr. Scott of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on self contained, carafe-
         less automatic drip coffeemaker with electronic clock.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SELF CONTAINED, CARAFE-LESS AUTOMATIC DRIP COFFEEMAKER WITH 
              ELECTRONIC CLOCK.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.47 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
David TJADER, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5962

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 21, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.