alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Stephen M. Carter, certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Superior Essex Inc.;

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)           designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)          evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)           disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)           all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)          anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: August 12, 2004 |                             |
|----------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                       | /s/  Stephen M. Carter |
|                       | Stephen M. Carter                |
|                       | *Chief Executive Officer*        |

 

----
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
the Smith Barney Appreciation Fund:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements
of the Smith Barney Appreciation Fund (the "Fund") for the year
ended December 31, 1998, we considered its internal control,
including control activities for safeguarding securities, in
order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of
expressing our opinion on the financial statements and to comply
with the requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on
the internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles. Those controls include the safeguarding of
assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or
irregularities may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection
of any evaluation of internal control to future periods is
subject to the risk that it may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and
operation may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in the internal control that might be
material weaknesses under standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness
is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of
the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively
low level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in
amounts that would be material in relation to the financial
statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a
timely period by employees in the normal course of performing
their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters involving
the internal control and its operation, including controls for
safeguarding securities that we consider to be material
weaknesses as defined above.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management, the Board of Directors of the Fund, and the
Securities and Exchange Commission.






February 8, 1999
The Honorable David D. Noce, United States Magistrate Judge

1

for the Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred

for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(c). 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 96-3815

___________

Valerie Townes, *

 *

Appellant, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Eastern District of Missouri.

City of St. Louis, *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: April 23, 1997

 Filed: April 29, 1997

___________

Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Valerie Townes appeals from the district court's order granting the 1

City of St. Louis summary judgment in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having

carefully reviewed the record and the parties' submissions, we conclude

that the district court's judgment was correct and that an extended

discussion is not warranted. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
STATE v. NIXON.

No. COA03-1514.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 6, 2004.

Certification Date July 26, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. No error in part-Docket numbers 02CRS053645, 02CRS053646. Reversed and remanded in part-Docket numbers 02CRS003947; 02CRS003948.
Benjamin C. STEWART v. William DAVIS.

No. 352P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 12, 2004.

William Davis, Pro Se.

C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th day of July 2004 by Plaintiff to order relinquishment of documents:

> "Motion dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 12th day of August 2004."
Diana Mae PATAKY v. Kenneth PATAKY.

No. 571A03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2004.

Lee M. Cecil, High Point, for Diana Mae Pataky (Hurt).

Joyce L. Terres, Greensboro, for Kenneth Pataky.

Prior report: 160 N.CApp. 289, 585 S.E.2d 404.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Plaintiff on the 21st day of October 2003 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2004."

Accordingly, the new brief of the Plaintiff shall be filed with this Court not more than 30 days from the date of certification of this order.

Plaintiff shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a *694written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.
HIGH INCOME OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
                          10f-3 REPORT
              October 1, 1996 through March 31,1997

                                                       % of
               Trade          Selling             Par Value/
Unit Fund % of
Issuer              Date      Dealer              Shares
Price     Assets    Issue

California Federal Pfd.  1/24/97        Goldman, Sachs
$108,000  $25,000   0.32%     2.67%
9.125% Series A

Tenet Healthcare:        1/27/97        Donaldson, Lufkin &
0.34 2.53
8.625% due 1/15/2007               Jenrette            5,000,000
99.894
8.000% due 1/15/2005                              4,000,000
99.358
Lomak Petroleum, Inc.    3/11/97        Chase Securities, Inc.
1,250,000 100.00    0.15 3.20
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 *Notice is hereby given*
                     that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC or Receiver), as Receiver for the institutions listed below, intends to terminate its receivership for said institutions. Notice of Intent to Terminate Receiverships
Fund
Receivership name
City
State
Date of 
                             appointment  
                             of receiver10021
Franklin Bank, SSB
Houston
TX
11/07/200810043
Security Savings Bank
Henderson
NV
02/27/200910061
BankUnited, FSB
Coral Gables
FL
05/21/200910062
Strategic Capital Bank
Champaign
IL
05/22/200910063
Citizens National Bank
Macomb
IL
05/22/200910185
La Jolla Bank, FSB
La Jolla
CA
02/19/201010343
Charter Oak Bank
Napa
CA
02/18/2011
 The liquidation of the assets for each receivership has been completed. To the extent permitted by available funds and in accordance with law, the Receiver will be making a final dividend payment to proven creditors. Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the continued existence of the receiverships will serve no useful purpose. Consequently, notice is given that the receiverships shall be terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date of this notice. If any person 
                    ( print page 37512)
                    wishes to comment concerning the termination of any of the receiverships, such comment must be made in writing, identify the receivership to which the comment pertains, and be sent within thirty days of the date of this notice to: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight Section, 600 North Pearl, Suite 700, Dallas, TX 75201. No comments concerning the termination of the above-mentioned receiverships will be considered which are not sent within this timeframe. (Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1819) Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Dated at Washington, DC, on June 17, 2022. James P. Sheesley, Assistant Executive Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2022-13433 Filed 6-22-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1439 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1439

    To prohibit the further extension or establishment of national 
 monuments in Idaho, except by express authorization of Congress, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 9, 2013

 Mr. Labrador introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit the further extension or establishment of national 
 monuments in Idaho, except by express authorization of Congress, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Idaho Land Sovereignty Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON NEW NATIONAL MONUMENTS IN IDAHO WITHOUT 
              CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL.

    This proviso of the last sentence of the first section of the Act 
of September 14, 1950 (64 Stat. 849, chapter 950; 16 U.S.C. 431a), is 
amended by inserting ``or Idaho'' after ``Wyoming''.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON NEW WILD LANDS IN IDAHO WITHOUT CONGRESSIONAL 
              APPROVAL.

    The Bureau of Land Management shall not implement, administer, or 
enforce Secretarial Order No. 3310, issued by the Secretary of the 
Interior on December 22, 2010, on any lands in Idaho, except by 
Congressional approval.
                                 <all>
```
| 1. | Such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007,      fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the      period ending June 30, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects,      the financial condition and results of operations of Modena 6,      Inc. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:       July 1, 2007                               |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                        |
| /s/      Jacque Bryon Oliphant                              |
| Jacque      Bryon OliphantPresident,      CEO, CFO Director |
Independent Auditors' Report


To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Citigroup Investments Corporate Loan Fund Inc.:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements
of Citigroup Investments Corporate Loan Fund Inc. (the Fund),
formerly known as Travelers Corporate Loan Fund Inc. for the year
ended September 30, 2002, we considered its internal control,
including control activities for safeguarding securities, in
order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of
expressing our opinion on the financial statements and to comply
with the requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on
internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Those controls include the safeguarding of assets against
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, error or
fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any
evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to
the risk that it may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in internal control that might be material
weaknesses under standards established by the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness is a
condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the
internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low
level the risk that errors or fraud in amounts that would be
material in relation to the financial statements being audited
may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees
in the normal course of performing their assigned functions.
However, we noted no matters involving internal control and its
operation, including controls for safeguarding securities that we
consider to be material weaknesses as defined above as of
September 30, 2002.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management and the Board of Directors of the Fund and the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not intended to be and
should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.


                                                  KPMG LLP

New York, New York
November 13, 2002
INTERMEDIATE MUNI FUND, INC.

Supplement dated March 20, 2001 to
Prospectus dated April 28, 2000

The follow information revises and supersedes, as applicable, the
information set forth in the Prospectus under "Investment
Objective and Management Policies".

The Fund's policy is to invest at least 80% of its total assets in
municipal securities with remaining maturities of less that
fifteen years and to maintain a dollar-weighted average effective
maturity of the entire portfolio between three and ten years.








FD O2263
Elizabeth SLOAN v. John F. HITT.

No. 216P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 24, 2004.

Michelle D. Reingold, for Elizabeth Sloan.

Jeffrey L. Miller, Greenville, for John F. Hitt.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 6th day of May 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."
# Official Journal C 112/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 112 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6430 March 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 112

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6430 March 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 112/01 | Euro exchange rates — 29 March 2021 | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 112/01

Euro exchange rates — 29 March 2021

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 112/02 | Publication of an application for amendment of a specification for a name in the wine sector, as referred to in Article 105 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council | 2 |
| 2021/C 112/03 | Publication of an application for registration of a name pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 12 |

V   Announcements

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2021/C 112/02

Publication of an application for amendment of a specification for a name in the wine sector, as referred to in Article 105 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council

2

2021/C 112/03

Publication of an application for registration of a name pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

12

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Modena 2 Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary L. Moore
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/  Gary L. Moore
--------------------------
Gary L. Moore
Chief Executive Officer

September  10, 2004
# Official Journal C 170/2016

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 170 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5911 May 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 170

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5911 May 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory Acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2016/C 170/1 | Position (EU) No 9/2016 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for the purposes of research, studies, training, voluntary service, pupil exchange schemes or educational projects and au pairing Adopted by the Council on 10 March 2016 | 1 |
| 2016/C 170/2 | Statement of the Councils reasons: Position (EU) No 9/2016 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for the purposes of research, studies, training, voluntary service, pupil exchange schemes or educational projects and au pairing | 40 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory Acts

COUNCIL

2016/C 170/1

Position (EU) No 9/2016 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for the purposes of research, studies, training, voluntary service, pupil exchange schemes or educational projects and au pairing Adopted by the Council on 10 March 2016

1

2016/C 170/2

Statement of the Councils reasons: Position (EU) No 9/2016 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for the purposes of research, studies, training, voluntary service, pupil exchange schemes or educational projects and au pairing

40

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN