alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Doug Leifermann, certify that:

     1. I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Golden Oval Eggs, LLC;

     2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

     b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

     5. The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

     a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

     b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting. 
|   |   |                                       |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|   |   | /s/  Doug Leifermann                       |
|   |   | Doug  Leifermann                           |
|   |   | *Vice President/**Chief Financial Officer* |

Date: January 14, 2005

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 VIASPACE INC.
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 Date: November 14, 2005
    /s/ CARL KUKKONENCarl KukkonenChief Executive OfficerDate: November 14, 2005
    /s/ STEPHEN J. MUZIStephen J. MuziChief Financial Officer
Lamar LOVETT, Petitioner v. TEXAS

No. 19-6257

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 16, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

JAN 29 2003

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

STEVEN E. SHAFER,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 02-6129

D.C. No. CIV-00-1250-M and 

CR-99-16-M

(W.D. Oklahoma)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before EBEL , BALDOCK , and LUCERO , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
-2-

Steven E. Shafer was convicted of the knowing receipt of videotapes

transmitted through interstate commerce that depicted minors engaged in sexually

explicit conduct, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2). He did not appeal his

conviction, but did file a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 attacking his

sentence. The district court denied relief in an order dated March 29, 2002,

see R., Vol. I at 185-94, and also failed to issue a certificate of appealability,

which we deem a denial of the same. See United States v. Kennedy , 225 F.3d

1187, 1193 n.3 (10th Cir. 2000).

Shafer must obtain a certificate of appealability to pursue his appeal in this

court, as required by the provisions of the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death

Penalty Act. See id. at 1193. Before we grant the certificate, he “must make

a ‘substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.’” See id. (quoting

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2)). On appeal, Shafer raises three issues. He argues that: 

1) he was wrongly denied proper notice of certain additional conditions of his

supervised release, 2) his receipt of the videotapes did not implicate interstate

commerce, and 3) his counsel’s representation was ineffective in four ways.

After careful consideration of Shafer’s arguments and the record on appeal

in light of applicable law, we conclude that he has not demonstrated entitlement 
-3-

to a certificate of appealability under the above standard. His request for

a certificate of appealability is DENIED, and this appeal is DISMISSED.

Entered for the Court

Bobby R. Baldock

Circuit Judge
RESORT REALTY OF THE OUTER BANKS, INC. T/A RESORT REALTY v. VOLKER BRANDT AND WIFE, EVA BRANDT.

No. 128P04

Supreme Court of North Carolina

April 1, 2004

**ORDER**

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 19th day of March 2004 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of April 2004.
SHIERTS v. ATLANTIC CAS. INS. CO.

COA03-1268.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 3, 2004.

Certification Date August 23, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Independent Auditors' Report



To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees
of Smith Barney Muni Funds:

In planning and performing our audits of the financial statements of the
Georgia Portfolio and Pennsylvania Portfolio of Smith Barney Muni Funds (the
"Funds") for the year ended March 31, 2001, we considered their internal
control, including control activities for safeguarding securities, in order to
determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on
the financial statements and to comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR,
not to provide assurance on internal control.

The management of the Funds are responsible for establishing and maintaining
internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments
by management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs
of controls.  Generally, controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the
entity's objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. Those controls include the
safeguarding of assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, error or fraud may occur
and not be detected.  Also, projection of any evaluation of internal control
to future periods is subject to the risk that it may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily disclose all
matters in internal control that might be material weaknesses under standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A
material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of one or
more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low
level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in amounts that
would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited may
occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal
course of performing their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters
involving internal control and its operation, including controls for
safeguarding securities, that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined
above as of March 31, 2001.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of management, the
Board of Trustees of the Funds, and the Securities and Exchange Commission and
is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these
specified parties.




New York, New York
May 8, 2001
**Exhibit
      32.2**














**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL**


**OFFICER
      REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING**


**FINANCIAL
      STATEMENTS**









I,
      Paul
      E. Martin, the Interim Chief Financial Officer of CCO Holdings, LLC and CCO
      Holdings Capital Corp. (the "Company") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      hereby certify that, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
      the
      period ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission:




|· | fully
              complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
              Act of 1934; and
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|· | the
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------








/s/
      Paul E. Martin


Paul
      E.
      Martin


Interim
      Chief Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial Officer)


August
      5,
      2005
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE


OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING


FINANCIAL STATEMENTS







I, Neil Smit, the President and Chief Executive Officer of CCO Holdings, LLC and CCO Holdings Capital Corp. (the "Company") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2009 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:




·
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




·
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









/s/
Neil Smit


Neil
Smit


President
and Chief Executive Officer


August
3, 2009
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1534 

To amend section 70107 of title 46, United States Code, to authorize 

appropriations for the port security grant program through 2017. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 12, 2013 

Ms. HAHN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To amend section 70107 of title 46, United States Code, 

to authorize appropriations for the port security grant 

program through 2017. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Port Security Grant 

5 Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PORT SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM. 

7 Section 70107(l) of title 46, United States Code, is 

8 amended by striking ‘‘2013’’ and inserting ‘‘2017’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
STATE of North Carolina v. Jeffrey Craig POTEAT. Appealed by Charles T. Mathis.

No. 223P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 24, 2004.

Aaron Michel, Charlotte, Benjamin D. Porter, Winston-Salem, for Charles Timothy Mathis.

David Holley, Graham, for Alamance-Burlington Bd. of Educ.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the second petition filed on the 25th day of May 2004 by Appellant-Bondsman (Mathis) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> 
*916
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."
Arthur LOPEZ, Petitioner v. CALIFORNIA

No. 19-6472

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three denied.
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
Smith Barney Managed Municipals Fund Inc.:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements
of the Smith Barney Managed Municipals Fund Inc. (the "Fund") for
the year ended February 28, 1998, we considered its internal
control, including control activities for safeguarding
securities, in order to determine our auditing procedures for the
purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and
to comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide
assurance on the internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles. Those controls include the safeguarding of
assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or
irregularities may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection
of any evaluation of internal control to future periods is
subject to the risk that it may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and
operation may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in the internal control that might be
material weaknesses under standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness
is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of
the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively
low level the risk that errors or irregularities in amounts that
would be material in relation to the financial statements being
audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by
employees in the normal course of performing their assigned
functions.  However, we noted no matters involving the internal
control and its operation, including controls for safeguarding
securities that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined
above.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management, the Board of Trustees of the Fund, and the Securities
and Exchange Commission.



April 20, 1998
# Official Journal C 114/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 114 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6226 March 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 114

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6226 March 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 114/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9254 — MUTB/CFSGAM) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 114/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9254 — MUTB/CFSGAM) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2019/C 114/02 | Council conclusions on the revised EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes | 2 |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 114/03 | Euro exchange rates | 9 |
| | European Food Safety Authority |
| 2019/C 114/04 | Networking of organisations operating in the fields within the European Food Safety Authority's (EFSA's) mission | 10 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2019/C 114/02

Council conclusions on the revised EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes

2

European Commission

2019/C 114/03

Euro exchange rates

9

European Food Safety Authority

2019/C 114/04

Networking of organisations operating in the fields within the European Food Safety Authority's (EFSA's) mission

10

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 114/05 | Publication of the single document amended following the approval of a minor amendment pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 | 11 |
| 2019/C 114/06 | Publication of the amended single document following the approval of a minor amendment pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 | 15 |

V   Announcements

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2019/C 114/05

Publication of the single document amended following the approval of a minor amendment pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012

11

2019/C 114/06

Publication of the amended single document following the approval of a minor amendment pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012

15

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
350 U.S. 997, 76 S.Ct. 547

#### A. E. HOSS and Sullens & Hoss, Inc., a Corporation, petitioners, v. C. G. (Jim) PURINTON.

No. 700.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 26, 1956.

Mr. Bailey E. Bell, for petitioners.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Denied.
II 

Calendar No. 385 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1036 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 25, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

MAY 21, 2014 

Reported by Mr. CARPER, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 103 Center Street West in Eatonville, Washington, as the ‘‘National Park Ranger Margaret Anderson Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NATIONAL PARK RANGER MARGARET ANDER4 SON POST OFFICE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 103 Center Street West in 

7 Eatonville, Washington, shall be known and designated as 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1036 RS

1 the ‘‘National Park Ranger Margaret Anderson Post Of2 fice’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘National Park Ranger 

7 Margaret Anderson Post Office’’. 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 385 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1036 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostRanger Margaret Anderson Post Office’’. Eatonville, Washington, as the ‘‘National Park al Service located at 103 Center Street West in 

MAY 21, 2014 

Reported without amendment 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification of the Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of K-Fed Bancorp (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kay M. Hoveland, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the company’s financial condition and results of operations.











Date: November 15, 2010
/s/ K. M. HovelandK. M. HovelandPresident and Chief Executive Officer