alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7259** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,

v. FREDDY S. CAMPBELL, a/k/a Freddy , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia , at Charleston

. Robert C. Chambers, Chief District Judge. ( 2:05

- cr
- 00120

- 1 )

Submitted : January 21, 2014 Decided: January 23, 2014

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACK ER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Freddy S. Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Freddy S. Campbell appeals the district court ’ s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Campbell , No. 2:05

- cr
00120

- 1 (S.D.W. Va. July 12, 2013) . We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before th is court and argument woul d not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Felix Lyle COWAN, Petitioner, v. Eli LILLY, et al.

No. 19-5237

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
10F-3 REPORT

           SMITH BARNEY PRINCIPAL RETURN FUND
               SECURITY AND GROWTH FUND

           March 1, 2001 through May 31, 2001

                   Trade                                     % of
Issuer             Date    Selling Dealer    Shares   Price  Issue(1)
Agere Systems Inc. 3/27/01 Morgan Stanley DW $116,400 6.000  0.17%A

(1) Represents purchases by all affiliated funds; may not exceed
    25% of the principal amount of the offering.

A - Includes purchases of $573,600 by other SB Mutual Funds.
STATE of North Carolina v. Carnell Jamar GANTT.

No. 662P03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2004.

David G. Belser, Asheville, for Gantt.

Mary Jo Alcoke, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 588 S.E.2d 893.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd day of December 2003 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2004."
**EXHIBIT 35.1****SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**Re:  Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC in its capacity as Servicer (the "Servicer") under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2018, among Mercedes-Benz Auto Receivables Trust 2018-1, as Issuer, Daimler Retail Receivables LLC, as Depositor, and Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC, as Seller and Servicer (the "Servicing Agreement"), for the period from July 25, 2018, to December 31, 2018 (the "Reporting Period"). I, Brian T. Stevens, certify that: (a)A review of the Servicer's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theServicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.(b)To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations underthe Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.Dated:  March 25, 2019 /s/ Brian T. StevensName: Brian T. Stevens Title: Vice President and Controller
# Official Journal C 380/2011

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2011.380.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 380 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5429 December 2011 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2011.380.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 380

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5429 December 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 380/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6376 — Arcelormittal/Atic Services) (1) | 1 |
| 2011/C 380/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6307 — Cassa Depositi e Prestiti/OMV Gas/Trans Austria Gasleitung JV) (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2011/C 380/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6376 — Arcelormittal/Atic Services) (1)

1

2011/C 380/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6307 — Cassa Depositi e Prestiti/OMV Gas/Trans Austria Gasleitung JV) (1)

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 380/03 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2011/C 380/03

Euro exchange rates

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 380/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6448 — OPTrust/PGGM/Global Vía Infraestructuras/Globalvía) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 3 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2011/C 380/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6448 — OPTrust/PGGM/Global Vía Infraestructuras/Globalvía) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2011/C 380/05 | Note to the reader (see page 3 of the cover) | s3 |

2011/C 380/05

Note to the reader (see page 3 of the cover)

Note to the reader

s3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
SEILA LAW LLC, Petitioner v. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

No. 19-7

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 14, 2020

Motion of petitioner Seila Law LLC for enlargement of time for oral argument and for divided argument, and of United States House of Representatives for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted, and the time is divided as follows: 20 minutes for the petitioner, 20 minutes for the Solicitor General, 20 minutes for the Court-appointed *amicus curiae* , and 10 minutes for the United States House of Representatives.
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Effective Profitable Software, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Don Bratcher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| 1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| 2. | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Effective Profitable Software, Inc. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Dated: July 5, 2006

 

*/s/ Don Bratcher*

Don Bratcher

Chief Financial Officer
ex_151912.htm


Exhibit 10.1


CESCA THERAPEUTICS INC.


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE


convertible note


 


This Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment No. 1”) is made as of July 23, 2019 (the “Effective Date”) to the Convertible Note Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated January 29, 2019 by Cesca Therapeutics Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Orbrex USA Co. Limited (“Orbrex”).


 


WHEREAS, with the amendment, the Parties desire to revise the Agreement in order to amend and replace Section (1) of the Agreement. The Parties hereby mutually agree that the Agreement shall be amended as follows:


 


SECTION 1.     Amendment of the Agreement.


 


On and after the Effective Date, Section 1 shall be as follows:


 


(1) PAYMENTS OF PRINCIPAL; PREPAYMENT. On the Maturity Date, the Company shall pay to the Holder an amount in cash representing all outstanding Principal, and accrued and unpaid interest. The “Maturity Date” shall be July 31, 2022.


 


 


 


SECTION 2.     Effectiveness. This Amendment No. 1 shall become effective as of the Effective Date written above. Upon the effectiveness hereof, all references in the Agreement to “this Agreement” or the like shall refer to the Agreement as amended hereby by this Amendment No. 1.


 


SECTION 3.     Counterparts. This Amendment No. 1 may be executed in any number of counterparts and by the different parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which shall together constitute one and the same instrument.


 


SECTION 4.     Law; Construction. THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 AND ANY CLAIM, CONTROVERSY OR DISPUTE RELATING TO OR ARISING OUT OF THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.


 


SECTION 5.     Entire Agreement. Except as amended by this Amendment No.1, all of the terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby confirmed in all respects.


 


[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]


 



 




 




 


The Parties have executed this Amendment No.1 as of the Effective Date set forth above.


 


	
			 

				
			COMPANY:

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			 

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			CESCA THERAPEUTICS INC.

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			a Delaware corporation

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			 

				
			 

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			 

				
			 

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			 

				
			 

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			By:

				
			 /s/ Xiaochun Xu

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			Name:

				
			  Xiaochun (Chris) Xu

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			Title:

				
			  Chairman & CEO

				
			 

			



 


 


	
			 

				
			INVESTORS:

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			 

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			Orbrex (USA) Co. Limited

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			 

				
			 

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			 

				
			 

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			 

				
			 

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			By:

				
			 /s/ Lan Fang Yuan

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			Name:

				
			  Lan Fang Yuan

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			Title:

				
			  President

				
			 

			



 


(Signature page to Amendment No. 1 to the Convertible Note)
Reginald Jerry SHAW, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6828

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
10f-3 REPORT

SMITH BARNEY FUNDAMENTAL VALUE FUND INC.

May 1, 2002 through July 31, 2002

	Trade				% of
Issuer	Date	Selling Dealer	Amount	Price	Issue (1)
Toys R Us	5/21/2002	CS First Boston	$4,412,500 	$17.65 	2.17%
El Paso Corp.	6/20/2002	CS First Boston	 15,960,000 	 19.95  3.13A




(1)  Represents purchases by all affiliated funds; may not exceed
       25% of the principal amount of the offering.
      Note: These purchases were made as part of a secondary offering.

A - Includes purchases of $12,181,470 by other affiliated mutual funds.
Clifford ABSHIRE, Petitioner, v. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS.

No. 18-9486

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

The petition for rehearing is denied.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1444 

To improve the H–2A agricultural worker program for use by dairy workers, 

sheepherders, and goat herders, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 9, 2013 

Mr. OWENS (for himself, Mr. HANNA, and Mr. WELCH) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To improve the H–2A agricultural worker program for use 

by dairy workers, sheepherders, and goat herders, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘H–2A Improvement 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NONIMMIGRANT STATUS FOR DAIRY WORKERS, 

7 SHEEPHERDERS, AND GOAT HERDERS. 

8 Section 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a) of the Immigration and 

9 Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a)) is 

10 amended by inserting ‘‘who is coming temporarily to the 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1444 IH

1 United States to perform agricultural labor or services as 

2 a dairy worker, sheepherder, or goat herder, or’’ after 

3 ‘‘abandoning’’. 

4 SEC. 3. SPECIAL RULES FOR ALIENS EMPLOYED AS DAIRY 

5 WORKERS, SHEEPHERDERS, OR GOAT HERD6 ERS. 

7 Section 218 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

8 (8 U.S.C. 1188) is amended— 

9 (1) by redesignating subsections (h) and (i) as 

10 subsections (i) and (j), respectively; and 

11 (2) by inserting after subsection (g) the fol12 lowing: 

13 ‘‘(h) SPECIAL RULES FOR ALIENS EMPLOYED AS

14 DAIRY WORKERS, SHEEPHERDERS, OR GOAT HERD15 ERS.— 

16 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other 

17 provision of this Act, an alien admitted as a non18 immigrant under section 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a) for 

19 employment as a dairy worker, sheepherder, or goat 

20 herder— 

21 ‘‘(A) may be admitted for an initial period 

22 of 3 years; and 

23 ‘‘(B) subject to paragraph (3)(E), may 

24 have such initial period of admission extended 

25 for an additional period of up to 3 years. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1444 IH

1 ‘‘(2) EXEMPTION FROM TEMPORARY OR SEA2 SONAL REQUIREMENT.—Notwithstanding section 

3 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a), an employer filing a petition to 

4 employ H–2A workers in positions as dairy workers, 

5 sheepherders, or goat herders shall not be required 

6 to show that such positions are of a seasonal or tem7 porary nature.’’. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Independent Auditors' Consent



To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Managed Municipals Portfolio Inc.:

We consent to the use of our report dated July 14, 1997 for the 
Managed Municipals Portfolio Inc. incorporated herein by 
reference and to the references to our Firm under the headings 
"Financial Highlights" and "Experts" in the Prospectus and 
"Independent Public Auditors" in the Statement of Additional 
Information.
 



	KPMG Peat Marwick 
LLP


New York, New York
September 12, 1997
Gregory Dean BANISTER, Petitioner v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-6943

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 12, 2019

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted.
John Barry JOINES v. Jerry Dean ANDERSON and wife, Janney Elizabeth Anderson and the North Carolina Department of Revenue.

No. 635P03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2004.

A. Clyde Tomlin, for John Barry Joines.

Alexandra M. Hightower, Assistant Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 587 S.E.2d 926.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th day of December 2003 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2004."
James WALKER, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-373

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 16, 2019

Motion of petitioner to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.
Robert Matthew WITTAL, Petitioner, v. MONTANA.

No. 19-6848

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Montana denied.
SMITH BARNEY FUNDS, INC.
SHORT-TERM U.S. TREASURY SECURITIES PORTFOLIO
(the "Portfolio") 

Supplement dated March 5, 1997 to 
April 1, 1996 Portfolio Prospectus


The following information supplements and, to the extent
inconsistent therewith, supercedes the disclosure 
under "Investment  Objective and 
Management Policies":


		The dollar-weighted average maturity of the Portfolio's
		securities shall normally not be less than two nor more
		than five years.  The maximum remaining maturity of the
		securities in which the Portfolio shall normally invest will 
		be no greater than ten years.





FD01277
Saldy MARZAN, Petitioner, v. CORECIVIC CORRECTIONAL CENTER, et al.

No. 19-5229

Supreme Court of the United States.

Jan. 13, 2020

The petition for rehearing is denied.
John Garrett SMITH, Petitioner v. WASHINGTON

No. 19-6578

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Washington denied.
Robert B. LYNN, Petitioner, v. Theodore A. MCKEE, Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, et al.

No. 18-9158

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
# Official Journal C 259/19 O

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 259 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4819 October 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 259

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4819 October 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Acts adopted under Title VI of the Treaty on European Union |
| 2005/C 259/1 | Council Decision of 12 October 2005 adjusting the basic salaries and allowances applicable to Europol staff | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

Acts adopted under Title VI of the Treaty on European Union

2005/C 259/1

Council Decision of 12 October 2005 adjusting the basic salaries and allowances applicable to Europol staff

1

---

| | I   Information |
| --- | --- |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 259/2 | Euro exchange rates | 3 |
| 2005/C 259/3 | Information procedure — Technical rules (1) | 4 |
| 2005/C 259/4 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3995 — Belgacom/Telindus) (1) | 10 |

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 259/2

Euro exchange rates

3

2005/C 259/3

Information procedure — Technical rules (1)

4

2005/C 259/4

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3995 — Belgacom/Telindus) (1)

10

---

| | III   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 259/5 | Call for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Integrating and strengthening the European Research Area’ — Activity: thematic priority area: information society technologies (IST) — Call identifier: FP6-2005-IST-41 | 11 |

III   Notices

Commission

2005/C 259/5

Call for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Integrating and strengthening the European Research Area’ — Activity: thematic priority area: information society technologies (IST) — Call identifier: FP6-2005-IST-41

11

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
### NUMBER 13

- 1 4

- 00 545

- C R

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ THE STATE OF TEXAS , A ppellant ,

v.

JAMES GREEN A

/ K / A ANTHONY GREEN , A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 148th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, the State of Texas, by and through its Criminal District Attorney, the

Honorable Mark Skurka , has filed a motion for dismissal of its appeal pursuant to Rule

42.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2(a). No2

decis ion of this Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion and dismiss the

appeal.
Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be

entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith. Pending motions, if any, are dismissed

as moot.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed the 10th day of September , 2015

.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 121 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a 5-year reinstatement of the real property standard deduction and to adjust such deduction for inflation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2013 

Mr. HOLT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

a 5-year reinstatement of the real property standard 

deduction and to adjust such deduction for inflation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REINSTATEMENT OF REAL PROPERTY STAND4 ARD DEDUCTION. 

5 (a) EXTENSION.—Subparagraph (C) of section 

6 63(c)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended 

7 by striking ‘‘in 2008 or 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘after De8 cember 31, 2012, and before January 1, 2018’’. 

9 (b) ADJUSTMENTS FOR INFLATION.— 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HR 121 IH

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (B) of section 

2 63(c)(4) of such Code is amended— 

3 (A) by inserting ‘‘(2013 in the case of the 

4 dollar amount contained in paragraph (7)(B))’’ 

5 after ‘‘1988’’, 

6 (B) by striking ‘‘or (5)’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘(5), or (7)(B)’’, and 

8 (C) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of clause 

9 (i), by striking the period at the end of clause 

10 (ii) and inserting ‘‘, and’’, and by inserting 

11 after clause (ii) the following: 

12 ‘‘(iii) ‘calendar year 2011’ in the case 

13 of the dollar amount contained in para14 graph (7)(B).’’. 

15 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subparagraph 

16 (B) of section 63(c)(7) of such Code is amended by 

17 striking ‘‘$1,000’’ and inserting ‘‘twice such 

18 amount’’. 

19 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

21 December 31, 2012. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with
Alexander Y. USENKO, Derivatively ON BEHALF OF the SUNEDISON SEMICONDUCTOR LTD. RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN, Petitioner v. MEMC LLC, et al.

No. 19-460

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.