alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7612

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DAVID LOUIS MCPHERSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Malcolm J. Howard,

District Judge. (CR-00-81-H, CA-02-58-H)

Submitted: January 16, 2003 Decided: January 24, 2003

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Louis McPherson, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

David Louis McPherson seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons

stated by the district court that McPherson has not made a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See

United States v. McPherson, Nos. CR-00-81-H; CA-02-58-H (E.D.N.C.

July 19, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability

and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 000919557
<NAME> AIM Capital Appreciation Portfolio
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER>012
   <NAME>Travelers Series Fund Inc.

<S>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>            Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  Oct-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                       Oct-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>              311,219,778
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>             438,416,784
<RECEIVABLES>                        4,230,034
<ASSETS-OTHER>                           4,348
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     442,651,166
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>             1,895,874
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                      0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>            5,995,660
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                  7,891,534
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                              0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>           233,910,005
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>               20,003,725
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>               18,376,228
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                    0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                       0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>             73,652,621
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                     0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>           127,197,006
<NET-ASSETS>                       434,759,632
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                      681,621
<INTEREST-INCOME>                    1,347,248
<OTHER-INCOME>                               0
<EXPENSES-NET>                       3,496,795
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>             (1,467,926)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>            73,848,449
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>           39,482,849
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>              111,863,372
<EQUALIZATION>                               0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                    0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                     0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                        0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>              9,967,211
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>          8,810,050
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                    470,336
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>             135,240,026
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                      0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>           10,058,139
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                      0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                   0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                3,363,224
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                      3,496,795
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>               419,089,941
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                   16.300
<PER-SHARE-NII>                         (0.070)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                  6.030
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                     0.000
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                0.530
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                     0.000
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                     21.730
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                           0.83



</TABLE>
| (logo)  **ncb**  National Cooperative Bank    | 2011  Crystal  Drive  Suite, 8oo  Arlington, VA 22202 |
|----------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

BANK 2018-BNK11, Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, Series 2018-BNK11(the “Trust”)

 

I, Karyn Mann, on behalf ofNational Cooperative Bank, N.A., as NCB Special Servicer (the “CertifyingServicer”), certify to Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. andits officers, directors and affiliates, and with the knowledge and intent thatthey will rely upon this certification, that:

 

1.        I (or Servicing Officers under mysupervision) have reviewed the Certifying Servicer’s activities during thepreceding calendar year between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2018 (the “ReportingPeriod”) and the Certifying Servicer’s performance under the Pooling andServicing Agreement; and

 

2.       To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certifying Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement inall material respects during the Reporting Period.

 

 

Date:February 4, 2019

 

 

NATIONALCOOPERATIVE BANK, N.A.,

asNCB Special Servicer

By:/s/ Karyn Mann

Name:Karyn Mann

Title:Senior Vice President
HOWERTON v. ARAI HELMET, LTD. et al.

No. 383PA03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 6, 2004.

Burley B. Mitchell, Jr., Raleigh, Richard T. Rice, Alison R. Bost, Winston-Salem, for W. Bruce Howerton, Jr., DDS.

Richard W. Ellis, Matthew W. Sawchak, Raleigh, James E. Ughetta, (Pro Hac Vice), White Plains, NY, for Arai Helmet Ltd., et al.

Jeff Hunt, District Attorney, for NC Conf. of District Attorneys.

Howard F. Twiggs, Donald H. Beskind, Jerome P. Trehy, Jr., Raleigh, Robert P.

Mosteller, Chadwick Professor of Law, for N.C. Academy of Trial Lawyers.

J. Donald Cowan, Jr., Dixie T. Wells, Greensboro, Hugh F. Young, Jr., for Product Liability Advisory Council, Inc.

John Robbins Wester, Scott William Gaylord, Charlotte, George Major Teague, Gary S. Parsons, Raleigh, for NC Citizens for Business and NC Association of Defense Attorneys.

Motion by Defendant for Admission of James C. Ughetta Pro Hac Vice has been filed and the following order entered:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of January 2004."
Floyd Dewaine SCOTT, Petitioner v. I. JIMENEZ

No. 18-9508

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

The petition for rehearing is denied.
Jackie Lee BOYD, Petitioner v. Carol MONROE, et al.

No. 19-6329

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
STATE of North Carolina v. Carlos Tremayne MITCHELL.

No. 71P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 1, 2004.

Carlos Tremayne Mitchell, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 17th day of February 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of April 2004."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 17th day of February 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Forsyth County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

> 
*696
"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of April 2004."
Timothy Milton BOONE, Petitioner v. MARYLAND

No. 19-6218

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland denied.
IN RE Kendall Dean MITCHELL, Petitioner

No. 19-5684

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

The petition for rehearing is denied.
Gary JACKSON, Petitioner v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

No. 19-6802

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# C_2008246EN.01S00301.xml

| 27.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Merisant Company (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31,2008 (the “Report”), the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|        | /s/ Paul Block          |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Paul Block              |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   | May 14, 2008       |

 

1

----
# C_2006131EN.01001501.xml

| 3.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 23 March 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale civile e penale di Cagliari) — Enirisorse SpA v Sotacarbo SpA

(Case C-237/04) (1)

1

(State aid - Articles 87 EC and 88 EC - Definition of aid - Shareholding of a public undertaking in the capital of a private undertaking - Right of withdrawal subject to a prior relinquishment of all claims over a company's assets)

(2006/C 131/26)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale civile e penale di Cagliari

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Enirisorse SpA

Applicant:

Defendant: Sotacarbo SpA

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunale di Cagliari — Interpretation of Articles 87 and 88(3) EC — Meaning of State aid — Public undertaking holding shares in the capital of a private undertaking — Compatibility of national rules authorising such a shareholding with Articles 43 and 49 EC

Operative part of the judgment

National provisions such as those at issue in the main proceedings, whereby members of a company controlled by the State may, in derogation from the general law, withdraw from that company on condition that they relinquish all claims over that company's assets, are not liable to be considered to be State aid for the purposes of Article 87 EC.

---

(1)  OJ C 201, 07.08.2004.

1

---
Endangered Species Act (ESA)

The Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973 regulates the conservation of species that are endangered or 

threatened and the conservation of the ecosystems on which they depend. A species or subspecies is considered 

endangered if it is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range. A species or 

subspecies is considered threatened if it is likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future. The ESA 

is jointly managed by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 

(USFWS). NMFS manages the conservation of marine species and some species that use both saltwater and 

freshwater (anadromous species), such as some species of sturgeon and salmon. USFWS manages the 

conservation of land and freshwater species as well as certain marine species, such as sea otters, manatees, 

and sea birds.

When a species is listed as endangered or threatened under the ESA, the relevant agency (NMFS or USFWS) 

may designate critical habitat for that species "to the maximum extent prudent and determinable." Critical habitat 

is specific areas that are essential to the conservation of a species. 

NOS Consultation Under ESA Section 7

Under Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA, federal agencies must ensure that their actions are not likely to jeopardize 

ESA-listed species or damage designated critical habitat. Federal agencies must consult with NMFS or USFWS 

when an action may affect a listed species or critical habitat. Formal consultation is initiated by the preparation 

and submission of a Biological Assessment (BA).

In preparing the PEIS, NOS ensured that the PEIS met all requirements to serve as a BA with the 

Preferred/Selected Alternative, Alternative B serving as the Proposed Action for the purpose of compliance under 

Section 7. 

Photo Credit (left to right): NOAA; Crew and Officers of NOAA Ship Miller Freeman; and Ed Lyman, NOAA
Following the publication of the Draft PEIS, NOS initiated an informal 

consultation under ESA Section 7 on August 26, 2021 with NMFS. In 

response, NMFS provided NOS a letter of concurrence on December 

14, 2022, completing the consultation for all species and critical 

habitat under NMFS jurisdiction. 

On August 26, 2021, NOS also initiated consultation under ESA Section 7 with USFWS. 

NOS expected that a formal consultation was required due to potential impacts to 

Spectacled Eiders (Somateria fischeri) and the Alaska-breeding population of Steller’s eiders 

(Polysticta stelleri). USFWS provided NOS with the Biological Opinion on December 20, 

2023, completing the consultation for all species and critical habitat under USFWS 

jurisdiction.

Outcomes: Through the ESA consultation process, NOS developed additional mitigation measures to minimize 

potential impacts to ESA-listed species from NOS project activities. The NOS mitigation measures will be 

implemented on each project as appropriate.

Photo Credit (top to bottom): Mark Sullivan, NOAA; Dr. Pablo Clemente-Colon, NOAA; and Sam Farkas
Smith Barney Appreciation Fund Inc.  
Smith Barney Growth Opportunity Fund  
Smith Barney Investment Grade Bond Fund  
  
  
Supplement dated November 12, 1996 to prospectuses*  
______________________________  
  
	The provisions contained in the Prospectus of each of the funds listed   
above (each a "fund") under "Exchange Privilege-Class A Exchanges"   
notwithstanding, effective October 4, 1996, Class A shares of the Fund that   
are exchanged for the same class of shares of another Smith Barney
Mutual Fund 
sold with a higher maximum sales charge, will not be subject to any sales   
charge differential.  
  
___________________  
* Prospectuses dated:  
  
Appreciation Fund Inc.  
March 1, 1996  
  
Growth Opportunity Fund  
April 29, 1996  
  
Investment Grade Bond Fund  
April 29, 1996, as amended June 24,   
1996  
  
  
g:\users\rav\stk1a.doc
Antonio SHAW, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-7098

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Jerry ADAMS, Jr., Petitioner v. Robert NEUSCHMID, Acting Warden

No. 18-8692

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 4(b)(xiv)


 


Lord Blackwell




Chairman


 


5 December 2017


 


Private & Confidential




The Lord Lupton CBE


 


Dear James,


 


Chairman - Lloyds Bank Corporate Markets
plc 


 


My letter of 2 March, 2017 requires me to
write to you following your formal appointment as a Director and Chairman of Lloyds Bank Corporate Markets plc (‘LBCM’)
from 3 August 2017, following receipt from the Prudential Regulatory Authority of a conditional banking licence with restrictions
with effect from 25 July 2017.


 


Your appointment to the Board of LBCM follows
your role as Chairman of the Non-Ring Fence Bank Preparatory Board.


 


The terms and conditions of your appointment
as a Director and Chairman of LBCM are as set out in my letter of 2 March, 2017 save that you will also serve as Chairman of the
LBCM Nomination Committee (subject to and with effect from receipt of regulatory approval) and as a member on its Board Risk, Audit
and Remuneration Committees.


 


Please acknowledge receipt and acceptance
of the above terms by signing and returning the enclosed copy of this letter.


 


Please do not hesitate to contact me for
any assistance in any matters during the term of your appointment.


 


Many thanks and Best wishes,


 


/s/ Norman Blackwell



    	 



    	



    


I acknowledge receipt of the letter dated
5 December, 2017 of which this is a copy and accept the terms of appointment.


 


	 	 	 	 
	Signed                   /s/ Lord Lupton                             	 	 
	Date                      3rd January 2018
UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Petitioner v. TEXAS, et al.

No. 19-841

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 21, 2020

Motion of petitioner to expedite consideration of the petitions for writ of certiorari denied.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1017 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture 

to sell certain Federal land, to direct that the proceeds of such sales 

be applied to reduce the Federal budget deficit, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 6, 2013 

Mr. POE of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on 

Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary 

of Agriculture to sell certain Federal land, to direct 

that the proceeds of such sales be applied to reduce 

the Federal budget deficit, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Land Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION TO SELL LAND. 

6 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—For each of fiscal years 2013 

7 through 2017, subject to valid existing rights, the SecVerDate Mar 15 2010 22:32 Mar 08, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1017.IH H1017

sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1017 IH

1 retary of the Interior or the Secretary of Agriculture, as 

2 the case may be, shall offer for competitive sale by auction 

3 all right, title, and interest, to the extent provided in sub4 section (b)(2), in and to the following: 

5 (1) Eight percent of the Federal land managed 

6 by the Bureau of Land Management. 

7 (2) Eight percent of the National Forest Sys8 tem land. 

9 (b) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.— 

10 (1) CONFIGURATION OF LAND.—The Secretary 

11 concerned shall configure the land to be sold to 

12 maximize marketability or achieve management ob13 jectives, and may prescribe such terms and condi14 tions on the land sales authorized by this Act as the 

15 Secretary deems in the public interest. 

16 (2) MINERAL RIGHTS.—For each fiscal year, 

17 the Secretary concerned may include in the sale of 

18 land under subsection (a) the mineral rights to such 

19 land for not more than 50 percent of the total acre20 age sold under subsection (a) by that Secretary, if 

21 the Secretary determines that such inclusion is likely 

22 to maximize marketability. 

23 SEC. 3. PROCEEDS FROM THE SALE OF LAND. 

24 All proceeds from the sale of land under this Act shall 

25 be deposited into the Treasury and applied— 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1017 IH

1 (1) to reduce the annual Federal budget deficit 

2 for the fiscal year in which the sums are received, 

3 except as provided in paragraph (2); and 

4 (2) if there is no annual Federal budget deficit 

5 for the fiscal year in which the sums are received, 

6 to reduce the outstanding Federal debt. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 114 (Tuesday, June 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 36003]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12861]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., June 16, 2022.

PLACE: Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic, the meeting will be open to the 
public via live webcast only. Visit the agency's homepage 
(www.ncua.gov) and access the provided webcast link.

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 1. Board Briefing, Post Exam Feedback Survey 
Update.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks, 
Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2022-12861 Filed 6-10-22; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
<PAGE>

                      SMITH BARNEY INVESTMENT FUNDS INC.

                                 On behalf of

                     SMITH BARNEY PREMIER SELECTIONS FUND

                     Supplement dated October 11, 1999 to
                        Prospectus dated July 16, 1999

  Effective immediately the prospectus of Premier Selections Fund is
supplemented to permit current investors to participate in systematic
investment and withdrawals as follows:

  By adding the following disclosure to the section of the prospectus entitled
"Buying shares":

Systematic Investment Plan

You may authorize Salomon Smith Barney or certain dealer representatives to
transfer funds automatically from a regular bank account, cash held in a
Salomon Smith Barney brokerage account or Smith Barney money market fund to
buy shares on a regular basis.

 . Amounts transferred should be at least: $25 monthly or $50 quarterly.

If you do not have sufficient funds in your account on a transfer date,
Salomon Smith Barney or the dealer representative may charge you a fee.


  By adding the following disclosure to the section of the prospectus entitled
"Redeeming shares":

Automatic Cash Withdrawal Plans

You can arrange for the automatic redemption of a portion of your shares on a
monthly or quarterly basis. To qualify you must own shares of the fund with a
value of at least $10,000 ($5,000 for retirement plan accounts) and each
automatic redemption must be at least $50. If your shares are subject to a
deferred sales charge, the sales charge will be waived if your automatic
payments do not exceed 1% per month of the value of your shares subject to a
deferred sales charge.

The following conditions apply:

 . Your shares must not be represented by certificates.
 . All dividends and distributions must be reinvested.

FD 01709
Sean Lee STRANDBERG, Petitioner v. Carmen Denise PALMER, Warden

No. 19-6166

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
BUNDY v. BOYLIN.

COA03-1187.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 3, 2004.

Certification Date August 23, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.