alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 278/2015

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 278 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5822 August 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 278

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5822 August 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 278/01 | Communication from the Commission — Publication of the application for the amendment of a traditional term as provided for in Articles 33 and 37 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 607/2009 | 1 |
| 2015/C 278/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7690 — CVC/Douglas Group) (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| 2015/C 278/03 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7696 — Lone Star/Balta) (
  1
  ) | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 278/01

Communication from the Commission — Publication of the application for the amendment of a traditional term as provided for in Articles 33 and 37 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 607/2009

1

2015/C 278/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7690 — CVC/Douglas Group) (
  1
  )

1

3

2015/C 278/03

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7696 — Lone Star/Balta) (
  1
  )

1

3

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 278/04 | Euro exchange rates | 4 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 278/04

Euro exchange rates

4

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 278/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7733 — Tokio Marine/HCC) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 5 |
| 2015/C 278/06 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7741 — Apollo Management/Stemcor) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 6 |
| 2015/C 278/07 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7711 — Advent International/Bain Capital/ICBPI) (
  1
  ) | 7 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2015/C 278/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7733 — Tokio Marine/HCC) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

5

2015/C 278/06

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7741 — Apollo Management/Stemcor) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

6

2015/C 278/07

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7711 — Advent International/Bain Capital/ICBPI) (
  1
  )

1

7

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
STATE of North Carolina v. Luke Edward STILLER, Jr.

No. 61P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 1, 2004.

Mark Montgomery, for Stiller.

Diane G. Miller, Assistant Attorney General, Mark Speas, District Attorney, for State.

Prior report: 162 N.C.App. 138, 590 S.E.2d 305.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 10th day of February 2004 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of April 2004."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th day of February 2004 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of April 2004."
Exhibit 35.1



Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services,
Inc.



This Annual Statement as to Compliance
is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 19, 2018 (the “Agreement”)
and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust
2018-2 (the “Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution
and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp.
in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.



The undersigned certifies
that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as
follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to
be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from April 19, 2018 through December
31, 2018, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations
under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any
such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. |                                                                            
|------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                     |                                                                            
|By:                                  | /s/ Connie Coffey                                                          
|                                     | Connie Coffey                                                              
|                                     | Executive Vice President, Corporate
Controller and Chief Accounting
Officer
Exhibit 33.20



LOGO

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONS REGULATION AB SERVICING
CRITERIA

For the calendar year ending December 31, 2018, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for Wells Fargo
Bank N.A.(the Servicer).

National Tax Search, LLC (NTS) is responsible for assessing compliance as
of December 31, 2018 and for the period from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the Reporting Period) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations
(the CFR). NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122(d)(l)(ii), 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122 (d)(2)(v),
1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the Applicable Servicing Criteria) are applicable to the activities NTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of
the Servicer using NTSs TaxQ system (the Platform Transactions).

NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that NTS has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2018 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform
Transactions taken as a whole.

Plante & Moran, PLLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation
report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2018 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

National Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor to Servicer



LOGO

Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO

January 25, 2019

130 S. Jefferson Street

Suite300

Chicago, IL 60661
Independent Auditors Report


To the Board of Trustees and Shareholders of
Smith Barney Investment Series:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements
of the Smith Barney Growth and Income Fund of the Smith Barney
Investment Series (Fund) for the year ended October 31, 2002, we
considered its internal control, including control activities for
safeguarding securities, in order to determine our auditing
procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the
financial statements and to comply with the requirements of Form
N-SAR, not to provide assurance on internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Those controls include the safeguarding of assets against
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, error or
fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any
evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to
the risk that it may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in internal control that might be material
weaknesses under standards established by the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness is a
condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the
internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low
level the risk that errors or fraud in amounts that would be
material in relation to the financial statements being audited
may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees
in the normal course of performing their assigned functions.
However, we noted no matters involving internal control and its
operation, including controls for safeguarding securities that we
consider to be material weaknesses as defined above as of October
31, 2002.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management and the Board of Trustees of the Fund and the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not intended to be and
should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.


                                                  KPMG LLP

New York, New York
December 11, 2002
IN RE Michael F. HARRIS, Petitioner

No. 19-7015

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Jair Mendoza MONTOYA, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6084

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1044 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1044

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Disperse Blue 79:1.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2013

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Disperse Blue 79:1.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISPERSE BLUE 79:1.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.03.46 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Disperse Blue 79:1) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2016''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1502 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to prevent concurrent receipt 

of unemployment benefits and Social Security disability insurance, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 11, 2013 

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas (for himself, Mr. RENACCI, Mr. TIBERI, Mr. 

REICHERT, Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania, Mr. REED, Mr. GRIFFIN of Arkansas, Mrs. BLACK, Mr. SMITH of Nebraska, Mr. BOUSTANY, and Mr. 

SCHOCK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to prevent 

concurrent receipt of unemployment benefits and Social 

Security disability insurance, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Social Security Dis5 ability Insurance and Unemployment Benefits Double Dip 

6 Elimination Act’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1502 IH

1 SEC. 2. DISQUALIFICATION ON RECEIPT OF DISABILITY IN2 SURANCE BENEFITS IN A MONTH FOR WHICH 

3 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION IS RE4 CEIVED. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 223(d)(4) of the Social 

6 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 423(d)(4)) is amended by adding 

7 at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(C)(i) If for any month an individual is entitled to 

9 unemployment compensation, such individual shall be 

10 deemed to have engaged in substantial gainful activity for 

11 such month. 

12 ‘‘(ii) For purposes of clause (i), the term ‘unemploy13 ment compensation’ means— 

14 ‘‘(I) ‘regular compensation’, ‘extended com15 pensation’, and ‘additional compensation’ (as such 

16 terms are defined by section 205 of the Federal17 State Extended Unemployment Compensation Act 

18 (26 U.S.C. 3304 note)); and 

19 ‘‘(II) trade adjustment assistance under title II 

20 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2251 et 

21 seq.).’’. 

22 (b) TRIAL WORK PERIOD.—Section 222(c) of the So23 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 422(c)) is amended by adding 

24 at the end the following: 

25 ‘‘(6)(A) For purposes of this subsection, an individual 

26 shall be deemed to have rendered services in a month if 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1502 IH

1 the individual is entitled to unemployment compensation 

2 for such month. 

3 ‘‘(B) For purposes of subparagraph (A), the term 

4 ‘unemployment compensation’ means— 

5 ‘‘(i) ‘regular compensation’, ‘extended com6 pensation’, and ‘additional compensation’ (as such 

7 terms are defined by section 205 of the Federal8 State Extended Unemployment Compensation Act 

9 (26 U.S.C. 3304 note)); and 

10 ‘‘(ii) trade adjustment assistance under title II 

11 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2251 et 

12 seq.).’’. 

13 (c) DATA MATCHING.—The Commissioner of Social 

14 Security shall implement the amendments made by this 

15 section using appropriate electronic data. 

16 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

17 this section shall apply with respect to months after De18 cember 2013. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of Blackstone / GSO Secured Lending Fund (the “Company”), does hereby  certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge:


(1) the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) the information contained in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: February 27, 2020


By:/s/ Stephan KuppenheimerStephan KuppenheimerChief Financial Officer
JOHN ALDEN LIFE v. NC INS. GUARANTY.

No. 66P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 1, 2004.

Christopher J. Blake, Joseph E. Eason, for NC Insurance Guaranty Association.

Allen Mills, for John Alden Life Ins. Co.

Kevin Benedict, Raleigh, Suzanne Shakian, for National Conference of Insurance Guaranty Funds.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd day of February 2004 by National Conference of Insurance Guaranty Funds for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of North Carolina Insurance Guaranty Association:

> "Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference this the 1st day of April 2004."
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1335 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1335

To require Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to disclose the minimum purchase 
   price that such an enterprise will accept on the short sale of a 
  residence financed by a mortgage purchased by such an enterprise in 
     order to make short sales a viable alternative to foreclosure.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 21, 2013

   Mrs. Davis of California introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to disclose the minimum purchase 
   price that such an enterprise will accept on the short sale of a 
  residence financed by a mortgage purchased by such an enterprise in 
     order to make short sales a viable alternative to foreclosure.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Short Sale Transparency Act of 
2013''.

SEC. 2. SHORT SALE DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT.

    (a) Disclosure.--The Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency 
shall require the Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal 
Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, in any case in which such Association 
or Corporation denies the purchase of a residential mortgage loan made 
to finance the purchase, under a short sale, of a covered dwelling on 
the basis that the purchase price involved in the short sale is 
insufficient, to promptly disclose to the prospective seller of the 
covered dwelling the amount by which such purchase price was less than 
the minimum purchase price sufficient for such Association or 
Corporation to approve purchase of such mortgage.
    (b) Definitions.--For purposes of this section, the following 
definitions shall apply:
            (1) Short sale.--The term ``short sale'' means, with 
        respect to a residential mortgage loan on a covered dwelling, a 
        purchase of the dwelling that will result in proceeds in an 
        amount that is less than the remaining amount due under the 
        residential mortgage loan on the covered dwelling.
            (2) Covered dwelling.--The term ``covered dwelling'' means 
        a residential real property that--
                    (A) consists of from one to four dwelling units; 
                and
                    (B) is subject to a mortgage, deed or trust, or 
                other security interest that secures a residential 
                mortgage loan on which the mortgagor is delinquent on 
                payments due under the mortgage loan.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Green Energy Holding Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report'), I, Dennis C. Murphy, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Dennis C. Murphy


Dennis C. Murphy, Chief Executive Officer





Dated:
February 12, 2008
STATE v. Herbert M. HUNTER.

No. 316P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 30, 2004.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, William D. Kenerly, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 24th day of June 2004 by Defendant for Stay of Sentence, With Bail:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 30th day of June 2004."