alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
** **

** **

**BERNARD FINANCIAL SERVICING GROUP**

20700 Civic Center Drive

Suite 240

Southfield, Michigan 48076

Tel: (248) 799-9200

Fax: (248) 799-9208

 

 

MANAGEMENT'S ASSERTATION ON COMPLIANCE

WITH REGULATION AB CRITERIA

 

 

 

Bernard Financial Corporation(the "Asserting Party") is responsible for assessing compliance as ofDecember 31, 2022, and the year ended with the following servicing criteria setforth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's RegulationAB: 1122 (d) (1) (i), 1122 (d) (1) (ii), 1122 (d) (1) (iv), 1122 (d) (1) (v),1122 (d) (2) (i), 1122 (d) (2) (ii), 1122 (d) (2) (iii), 1122 (d) (2) (iv),1122 (d) (2) (v), 1122 (d) (2) (vi), 1122 (d) (2) (vii), 1122 (d) (4) (i), 1122(d) (4)(ii), 1122 (d) (4) (iii), 1122 (d) (4) (iv), 1122 (d) (4) (v), 1122 (d)(4) (vi), 1122 (d) (4) (viii), 1122 (d) (4) (ix), 1122 (d) (4) (x), 1122 (d)(4) (xi), 1122 (d) (4) (xii), 1122 (d) (4) (xiii) and 1122 (d) (4) (xiv). Theseservicing criteria apply to public asset­ backed issuances commencing after December31, 2005.

 

The Assorting Party hasassessed its compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for thereporting period and has not identified any instances of materialnoncompliance. The Asserting Party has concluded that they have complied, inall material respects, with the applicable servicing criteria as outlined abovefor those asset-backed securitization transactions serviced by the AssertingParty.

 

Trainer & Bolbach Inc, anindependent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation reporton the assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for thereporting period set forth in this assertion.

 

 

/s/ Dennis S. Bernard

Dennis S. Bernard

President

Bernard Financial Corporation

 

 

February 10, 2023

 

 

**Real Estate Finance andInvestment Brokers**

 

(logo) MBA MEMBER
**
Exhibit 31.1 

Certification of Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function 

of the Servicer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(d)

**CERTIFICATION**

I, KevinJ. Cullum, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Nissan Auto Receivables 2018-A Owner Trust(the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. I amresponsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National Association 

Date: June 26, 2020 

 
By: 
/s/ Kevin J. Cullum
Kevin J. CullumPresident and Chief Executive Officer ofNissan Motor Acceptance Corporation(senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
 
**
May 9, 1997
Smith Barney Muni Funds
388 Greenwich Street
New York, New York 10013

                   Re:  Rule 24f-2 Notice
                              
Gentlemen:

    In connection with the filing by Smith Barney Muni
Funds, a Massachusetts business trust (the "Trust"), of a
Notice (the "Notice"), pursuant to Rule 24f-2 (the
"Rule")under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended
(the "Act"), for the Trust's fiscal year ended March 31
1997, the undersigned hereby provides the legal opinion
required by that Rule.

     In accordance with the Rule, the Trust has registered
an indefinite number of shares of common stock, $0.001 par
value, under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"1933 Act"). The purpose of the Notice is to make definite
the registration of 9,106,077,285 shares of the Trust (the
"Shares") sold in reliance upon the Rule during the fiscal
year ended March 31, 1997.

     The undersigned is Associate General Counsel of Smith
Barney Mutual Funds Management Inc., the Trust's Investment
Adviser, Administrator, and in such capacity, from time to
time and for certain purposes, acts as counsel to the Fund.
He has examined copies of the Fund's Articles of
Incorporation, its By-Laws, resolutions adopted by its Board
of Directors, and such other records and documents as have
been deemed necessary for purposes of this opinion.
Furthermore, he has examined a Certificate of the Controller
of the Fund to the effect that the Trust received the cash
consideration for each of the Shares in accordance with the
aforementioned organizational documents and resolutions.

     On the basis of the foregoing, and assuming all of the
Shares were sold in accordance with the terms of the Trust's
Prospectus in effect at the time of sale, he is of the
opinion that the Shares have been duly authorized and
validly issued and are fully paid and non-assessable.  This
opinion is for the limited purposes expressed above and
should not be deemed to be an expression of opinion as to
compliance with the 1933 Act, the 1940 Act or applicable
State "blue sky" laws in connection with the sales of the
Shares.


                                        Very truly yours,


                                        Robert Nelson
                                        Associate General
                                        Counsel
                                        Smith Barney Mutual
Funds
Management Inc.
EXHIBIT 10.4



EXHIBIT 10.4





AMENDMENT NO. 2

TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


            This Amendment No. 2  (this “Amendment’) dated as of January 1, 2004, is made by and between Vanguard Health Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and
Joseph D. Moore (the “Executive”).


            WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive executed a certain Employment Agreement (the “EA”) dated as of June 1, 1998, to secure the services of the Executive as its Executive Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer; and


            WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive wish  the Executive’s base salary set forth in Section 6(a) of the EA to be increased to $550,000, effective as of January 1, 2004.


            NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants herein contained, the Company and the Executive hereby agree that the EA is amended as follows:


            1.         Defined Terms.  Except for those terms defined above, the definitions of capitalized terms used in this Amendment are as provided in
the EA.


            2.         Amendment to Section 6(a).  Section 6(a) of the EA entitled “Base Salary” is hereby deleted and replaced with the
following new Section 6(a):





                        “(a).  Base Salary.  The Executive’s base salary hereunder, from July 1, 2001 to December 31,
2003, shall be $500,000 per year, payable semi-monthly. Effective  January 1, 2004, the Executive’s base salary hereunder shall be $550,000 per year, payable semi-monthly. The Board shall review such base salary at least annually and make such adjustment
from time to time as it may deem advisable, but the base salary shall not at any time be reduced from the base salary in effect from time to time.”


            3.         Ratification.  All other provisions of the EA remain unchanged and are hereby ratified by the Company and the Executive.








- 2 -





            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by  its duly authorized officer and the Executive has executed this Amendment, each as of the day and year first
set forth above.



                                                                                   
Vanguard Health Systems, Inc.



                                                                                   
By:       /s/ Charles N. Martin, Jr.                     


                                                                                               
Charles N. Martin, Jr.

                                                                                               
Chairman of the Board and

                                                                                               
Chief Executive Officer



                                                                                   
Executive:






                                                                       
            /s/ Joseph D.
Moore                                        


                                                                                   
Joseph D. Moore
#### LARS JACOBSON v. GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY.2

May 7, 1909.

Nos. 16,131—(104).

Verdict not Supported lby Evidence.

*Held,*in this, a personal injury, case, that the evidence was not sufficient to support a verdict for the plaintiff.

*518Action in the district court for Yellow Medicine county to recover $12,000 for personal injuries received while in defendant’s employ. The case was tried before Powers, J., who directed the jury to return a verdict in favor of defendant. Prom an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, he appealed.

Affirmed.

*Thomas E. Davis*and *E. A. Michel,*for appellant.

*W. E. Begg*and *O. 3. Winsor*for respondent.

2

 Reported in 120 N. W. 1089.

Per Curiam.

Action to recover for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff while unloading rails from a flat car by reason of the alleged negligence of the defendant. The negligence claimed is that while the plaintiff was engaged with several co-employees in unloading rails, .and while he was in the act of moving one of the rails to the edge of the car, one of his fellow servants, without warning to him, went upon the rails back of him and negligently pried his crowbar between the rails back of the plaintiff, whereby one of them was projected or rolled down upon his foot and crushed it. . When .the plaintiff rested his ease, the trial court, on motion of the defendant, directed a verdict for it on the ground that the work the plaintiff was doing did not involve a railroad hazard, and, further, that there was no evidence to sustain a finding that the injury received by the plaintiff was caused by the negligence of any one of his fellow servants.

That the plaintiff was seriously injured is admitted; but negligence in this case cannot be presumed prima facie from the mere fact of an accident and resulting injury, for it does not fall within the exceptional cases to which the rule of “res ipsa loquitur” applies. Waller v. Ross, 100 Minn. 7, 110 N. W. 252, 12 L. R. A. (N. S.) 721, 117 Am. St. 661. Upon a careful consideration of the whole evidence, we are of the opinion that it is clearly insufficient to justify a finding by the jury that the plaintiff was injured by any negligent act of his fellow servants or of the defendant. We do not decide whether the work the plaintiff was doing involved a railroad hazard.

Order affirmed.
EXHIBIT
32.1





Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of K-Fed Bancorp (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kay M. Hoveland, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.
            The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the company’s financial condition and results of
      operations.











Date:
      February 9, 2010
            /s/ K. M. HovelandK.
      M. HovelandPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs

          - [223A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice publishes the approval of the Amendment to the Gaming Compact (Amendment) between the Crow Creek Sioux (Tribe) and the State of South Dakota (State).

# DATES:

The Amendment takes effect on June 14, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of Indian Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary—Policy and Economic Development, Washington, DC 20240,                         *paula.hart@bia.gov,*                         (202) 219-4066.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Under section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2701*et seq.,*                     the Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the                     **Federal Register**                     notice of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. As required by 25 CFR 293.4, all compacts and amendments are subject to review and approval by the Secretary. The Amendment permits the Tribe to operate sports wagering within the Crow Creek Sioux Reservation, defines terms for sports wagering and requires the Tribe to meet or exceed South Dakota's hardware and software specifications. The Amendment is approved.                

Bryan Newland,

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2022-12742 Filed 6-13-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4337-15-P
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed April 17, 2024

.

________________ No. 3D24

- 344 Lower Tribunal No. 24

- 30525 CC

________________ 

### Roberto Somoza , Appellant,

vs. 

### Ramon Lavado Martinez , Appellee.

An Appeal from a non

- final order from the C ounty Court for Miami

Dade County, Lissette De La Rosa , Judge. Wolfe Law Miami, P.A ., and Richard C. Wolfe, for appellant. Legal Armor the People’s Law Firm , and Alian M. Perez , for appellee.

Before EMAS, GORDO and BOKOR , JJ. GORDO, J

. ON CONFESSION OF ERROR2 Roberto So moza (“Somoza”) appeals an order granting Ramon Lavado Martinez’s (“Martinez”) verified emergency motion for temporary injunction. Based on Martinez’s commendable and appropriate confession of error, we reverse the defective order under review , which lacks the requisite findings to justify entry of a temporary injunction, and remand for further proceedings. See Allied Universal Corp. v. Given , 223 So. 3d 1040, 1042 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (“To grant a temporary injunction, the moving party must plead and e stablish: (1) a likelihood of irreparable harm and the unavailability of an adequate remedy at law; (2) a substantial likelihood of success on the merits; (3) that the threatened injury to the petitioner outweighs any possible harm to the respondent ; and (4) that the granting of a temporary injunction will not disserve the public interest. ”) ; Angelino v. Santa Barbara Enters., LLC , 2 So. 3d 1100, 1103 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (“ The entry of a temporary injunction, however, will not stand unless the trial
courts makes specific findings in support of each and every element required for the entry of the injunction. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610 sets forth the form and scope requirements for the entry of a temporary injunction

. Every temporary injunction m ust specify the reasons for its entry, and it must describe in reasonable detail the act or acts to be restrained. ”).3 Reversed and remanded for further proceedings

.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1376 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

369 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive in Jersey City, New Jersey, as 

the ‘‘Judge Shirley A. Tolentino Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 21, 2013 

Mr. PAYNE (for himself, Mr. SIRES, Mr. LANCE, Mr. ANDREWS, Mr. LOBIONDO, Mr. GARRETT, Mr. RUNYAN, Mr. HOLT, Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN, 

Mr. PALLONE, Mr. PASCRELL, and Mr. SMITH of New Jersey) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 369 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive in Jersey 

City, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Judge Shirley A. Tolentino 

Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JUDGE SHIRLEY A. TOLENTINO POST OFFICE 

4 BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 369 Martin Luther King Jr. 

7 Drive in Jersey City, New Jersey, shall be known and desVerDate Mar 15 2010 01:44 Mar 30, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1376.IH H1376

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1376 IH

1 ignated as the ‘‘Judge Shirley A. Tolentino Post Office 

2 Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Judge Shirley A. 

7 Tolentino Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Willie JOHNSON, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5087

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

Plaintiff, '

'

' NO. 1:23-CR-116-MAC

'

versus

WILLIE DEAN NELSON, III, '

'

Defendant. '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION 

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Stetson conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued her Findings of Fact and Recommendation 

on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. Judge Stetson recommended that 

the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. She further recommended that the court adjudge 

the Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed against the Defendant. 

The parties have not objected to Judge Stetson’s findings. The court ORDERS that the 

Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge are 

ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Willie Dean Nelson, III, is 

Case 1:23-cr-00116-MAC-ZJH Document 22 Filed 03/25/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 56
2

adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 

922(g)(1) - Felon in Possession of a Firearm.

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 25th day of March, 2024.

Case 1:23-cr-00116-MAC-ZJH Document 22 Filed 03/25/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 57
SMITH BARNEY WORLD FUNDS, INC. 
Pacific Portfolio 

Supplement dated August 17, 1998
to Prospectus dated February 27, 1998




The following information supplements, and to the extent 
inconsistent therewith, replaces the information contained in the 
Prospectus.

Effective immediately, purchases of Class L shares may be made at 
net asset value without a sales charge by investors in the Equity 
Income Fund - Select Ten Hong Kong Unit Trust (All Series) and 
the Equity Income Fund - Select Ten Japan Unit Trust (All Series) 
(collectively, the "Unit Trusts") who sell their shares of the 
Unit Trusts prior to or upon maturity and who direct that the 
proceeds of such sales be invested in Class L shares.






FD 01536


u:\legal\funds\sbwf\1998\secdocs\supppac.doc
John DOE, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19M66

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal granted.