alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Lewis BROWN, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6189

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 12, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
WILLIAM H. SYKES, Employee v. MOSS TRUCKING COMPANY, INC., Employer, and PROTECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Carrier.

No. 153P04

Supreme Court of North Carolina

May 6, 2004

**ORDER**

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 31st day of March 2004 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of May 2004.
EXHIBIT 34.1

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



The Management Committee

BMW Financial Services NA, LLC



We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that BMW Financial Services NA, LLC (the “Company”) complied with the
      servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange  Commission's Regulation AB for Asset-Backed Securities, BMW Vehicle Owner Trust 2018-A, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(vi),
      1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x)(A)-(C), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), 1122(d)(4)(xiii), and 1122(d)(4)(xv) which management has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the asset-backed securities
      transactions being serviced as of December 31, 2019 and for the period from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
      management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria based on our examination.



Our examination was conducted in accordance with the attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the
      Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to BMW Vehicle Owner Trust 2018-A, determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance
      with the servicing criteria during the specified period, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  Our procedures were limited to selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period
      covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction included in BMW Vehicle Owner Trust 2018-A.  Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance
      arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a
      reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria specified in the first paragraph.



In our opinion, management’s assertion that BMW Financial Services NA, LLC complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of December 31, 2019 and for the period from January 1, 2019 to December 31,
      2019 is fairly stated, in all material respects.







/s/ CohnReznick LLP



Roseland, New Jersey

March 18, 2020
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROBERT HUFF,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 479 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of April, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
C ite as 2 7 I&N Dec. 481 ( A.G. 201 8 ) Interim Decision # 39 43

481 

### Matter of Daniel Girmai NEGUSIE

, Respondent

Decided by Attorney General Octo ber 18, 2018

U.S. Department of Justice
Office of the Attorney General



### BEFORE THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(h)(1)(i) (2018), I direct the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) to refer this case to me for review of its decision. The Board’s decision in this matter is automatically stayed pending my review. See Matter of Haddam

, A.G. Order No. 2380

- 2001 (Jan. 19, 2001). To assist me in my review, I invite the parties to these proceedings and interested amici to submit briefs on: Whether coercion

and duress are relevant to the application of the Immigration and Nationality

Act ’s persecutor bar. See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101(a)(42), 1158(b)(2)(A)(i), 1231(b)(3)(B)(i) (2012)

. The parties’ briefs shall not exceed 15,000 words and shall be filed on

or before November 8 , 2018. Interested amici may submit briefs not exceeding 9,0 00 words on or before November 15 , 2018. The parties may submit reply briefs not exceeding 6,0 00 words on or before November 15

, 2018. All filings shall be accompanied by proof of service and shall be submitted electronically to AGCertification@usdoj.gov, and in triplicate to:

United States Department of Justice Office of the Attorney General, Room 5114 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530

All briefs must be both submitted electronically and postmarked on or before the pertinent deadlines. Requests for extensions are disfavored.
Walter D. FAIRLEY, Petitioner v. Jason KENT, Warden

No. 19-6599

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund V L.P. (the "Fund") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the Fund's general partner, Boston Capital Associates V L.L.C., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                  
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.



|                  |  |                            
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:             |  |                            
|February 23, 2007 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  | Marc N. Teal               
|                  |  | Principal Financial Officer
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  |                            



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 31

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

         I, John M. Sharpe, Jr., President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Inner Systems, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Inner Systems, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and I have:

   (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
       information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
       subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
       particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

   (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
       procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the
       effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on such
       evaluation.

5. I have disclosed, based upon my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or
persons fulfilling the equivalent function):

   (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
       controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
       process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
       registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

   (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
       employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
       controls.

6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.

Date:  August 23, 2004                  /s/ John M. Sharpe, Jr.
                                        ----------------------------------
                                        John M. Sharpe, Jr.
                                        President, Chief Executive Officer
                                        and Chief Financial Officer
ODOM v. LANE.

No. 10P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 29, 2004.

John E. Grupp, Charlotte, Jack L. Cozort, Raleigh, for Carolinas-Anson Healthcare, Inc.

William Simpson, Kinston, for Odom.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 588 S.E.2d 548.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd day of January 2004 by Defendant (Carolinas-Anson Healthcare, Inc. d/b/a Anson Community Hospital) for Temporary Stay:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 29th day of January 2004."
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. WILLIAM F. KNELLER

No. COA03-1301

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed July 6, 2004.

This case not for publication

Haywood County No. 02 CRS 3833.

*Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General LaShawn L. Strange, for the State.*

*Hall & Hall Attorneys at Law, P.C., by Douglas L. Hall, for defendant-appellant.*

BRYANT, Judge.

William F. Kneller (defendant) appeals a judgment dated 7 July 2003 revoking his probation.

Defendant pled guilty to assault by pointing a gun and being an accessory after the fact to a felony. In a judgment dated 21 May 2002, the trial court imposed a suspended sentence of fourteen to seventeen months imprisonment and placed defendant on supervised probation for thirty-six months.

In a report dated 9 April 2003, defendant was charged with violating a regular condition of probation by committing four criminal offenses on 29 December 2002 and 5 January 2003. At a hearing held 7 July 2003, defendant admitted to willfully violatingprobation as alleged in the report. The trial court revoked defendant's probation and activated his suspended sentence. Defendant filed timely notice of appeal from the judgment.

Defendant claims on appeal the evidence adduced at the revocation hearing did not support the findings of fact made by the trial court in support of its judgment revoking probation. Specifically, he points to the finding in the judgment that he violated the terms of his probation as alleged "in paragraph[] 15 in the Violation Report or Notice dated 04-09-2003." Defendant observes that the violation report "contains only one paragraph . . . and does not contain a paragraph 15."

The record on appeal unequivocally demonstrates that the reference on the judgment to paragraph "15" is a typographical error. The allegations against defendant consisted of a single paragraph "1" in a single violation report dated 9 April 2003. Defendant admitted to a willful violation as alleged in the report. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment but remand for correction of the court's "FINDINGS" to refer to paragraph "1" of the violation report. *See State v. Sellers,*155 N.C. App. 51, 59, 574 S.E.2d 101, 106-07 (2002).

Affirmed; remanded for correction of clerical error in the judgment.

Chief Judge MARTIN and Judge McGEE concur.

Report per Rule 30(e).
Mitch CARMICHAEL, President of the West Virginia Senate, et al., Petitioners, v. WEST VIRGINIA, EX REL. Margaret L. WORKMAN

No. 18-1189

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia denied.
EX-10.2





 Exhibit 10.2 

Sign-On Bonus Repayment Agreement 

By signing this Sign-On Bonus Repayment Agreement (“Agreement”) below I,
                        , acknowledge that, as part of my employment offer with Pier 1 Services Company, its parent, or
any of its subsidiaries or affiliates (collectively “Pier 1 Imports”), I am being offered a lump sum signing bonus of $                , less applicable
taxes and other required withholdings (the “Bonus”), under the following terms and conditions. 
 In consideration of Pier 1 Imports’ payment
of the Bonus, I hereby agree as follows: 
 If, within twelve (12) months of my start date, my employment with Pier 1 Imports is terminated by Pier 1
Imports for “Cause” or by me without “Good Reason” (as such terms are defined in the Executive Agreement between myself and Pier 1 Imports, Inc. dated
                , 2019), I agree that within ten (10) business days of the separation of my employment from Pier 1 Imports, I will repay the Bonus on a pro-rated basis. The pro-rated repayment amount will be the amount of the Bonus less one twelfth (1/12) of the Bonus multiplied by the number of full months that have elapsed
since my start date. For example, if my employment with Pier 1 Imports is terminated by Pier 1 Imports for Cause or by me without Good Reason six months after my start date, I would reimburse Pier 1 Imports for fifty percent (50%) of the Bonus. I
further agree that I will make the repayment to Pier 1 Imports in the form of a check or money order made payable to Pier 1 Services Company. 
 In the
event I am obligated to repay or reimburse Pier 1 Imports for any portion of the Bonus as provided in this Agreement, I authorize Pier 1 Imports to deduct any portion of the Bonus which I am obligated to repay or reimburse from any wages due and
owing to me including, but not limited to, my final paycheck. I understand and agree that, if such monies are not sufficient to repay the full amount I owe, I will still remain obligated to reimburse or pay the balance to Pier 1 Imports. 

Nothing in this Agreement will be construed as a commitment, guarantee, agreement, or understanding of any kind or nature that Pier 1 Imports will continue to
employ me, nor will this Agreement affect in any way the right of Pier 1 Imports or me to terminate my employment at any time and for any reason, with or without Cause. I acknowledge and agree that I am an “at will” employee. 

This Agreement was negotiated and entered into, at least in part, in the state of Texas and shall be construed under the laws of the state of Texas without
regard to conflicts or choice of law and venue shall be brought exclusively in Tarrant County, Texas. 












 This Agreement is entered into and is effective as of the date indicated below. 

 

					
	Executive:	 		 	Pier 1 Services Company,
		 		 	By: Pier 1 Holdings, Inc.,
		 		 	its managing trustee
			
	  
	 		 	  

	[Name]	 		 	Christine Murray
		 		 	Executive V.P. – Human Resources and
		 		 	Chief Human Resources Officer
			
	Date:
                                         
               	 		 	Date:
# C_2018031EN.01000101.xml

| 27.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8740 — Schmolz+Bickenbach/Assets of Asco Industries)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 31/01)

On 22 January 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8740. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8740. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Clemente Avelino PEREIDA, Petitioner v. William P. BARR, Attorney General

No. 19-438

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit granted.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.2


AMENDMENT  TO 


ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


THIS AMENDMENT ("Amendment") to the August 20, 2018 Addendum (the "Addendum") to the Employment Agreement dated as of June 29, 2018, by and between Veoneer, Inc. (the "Company") and Jan Carlson (the "Executive"), shall be effective as of the 10th of June, 2019.


		
	1.
	The following paragraph shall be added as the final bullet point of the Addendum:




"Notwithstanding anything in this Addendum to the contrary, effective June 10th, 2019, the Company and Appointee agreed that if the 24,969 share equivalents scheduled to vest on July 1, 2019 so vest, then such 24,969 share equivalents shall be settled, on a one-for-one basis, in shares of the Company's common stock, instead of in cash. The shares of the Company's common stock shall be granted under, and pursuant to the terms and conditions of, the Veoneer, Inc. 2018 Stock Incentive Plan."


		
	2.
	The Addendum, as modified by the terms of this Amendment, shall continue in full force and effect from and after the date of the adoption of this Amendment.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be duly executed and delivered on the day and year first above written.










VEONEER, INC.




By: /s/ Mikko Taipale    
Name: Mikko Taipale
Title:  EVP, HR






/s/ Jan Carlson        
JAN CARLSON
exhibit104mcneil






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






                                       Date  May 10, 2019   To:   Jeff McNeil   From:   Badri Kothandaraman   Re:   2019 Merit Focal Review      We recently completed the Merit Focal Review process. Your ranking resulted in a salary  increase of 5.42%. Your manager will provide you feedback from the review process and the  resulting pay change.      Compensation Information   Current Annualized Salary:  $300,000.00   New Annualized Salary:  $316,260.00   Bonus Target : 75.00%   Your new pay rate is effective April 1, 2019.
EXHIBIT
10.133














Dear
Holders of Promissory Notes dated _______________:





The Company is requesting your consent
to an amendment of the maturity date of the above-referenced outstanding
promissory note issued by the Company and held by you which has a maturity date
of _______________, 2008 (the “Current Maturity Date”) to a new maturity date of
December 31, 2008 (the “New Maturity Date”) and waiver of any event of default
relating to the non-payment of such note as of _______________, 2008 (the
“Waiver”).





Toward that end, we ask that you
complete, sign and return this letter as soon as possible.





Please take a moment to sign and return
your consent by facsimile to 609-656-0869.










As of
      _______________, 2008
            Very truly yours,

              
              Dominique
      Prunetti Miller
              
              Dominique
      Prunetti Miller
              Secretary













The New
Maturity Date and Waiver is accepted


and
agreed by the undersigned noteholder:








By:________________________________


Name:


Date:








427 River
View Plaza
 Trenton,
New Jersey 08611
 Phone
609-656-0181
 Fax
609-656-0869