alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 38446]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13726]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: 30-Day notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Small Business Administration (SBA) is seeking approval 
from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for the information 
collection described below. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction 
Act and OMB procedures, SBA is publishing this notice to allow all 
interested members of the public an additional 30 days to provide 
comments on the proposed collection of information.

DATES: Submit comments on or before July 28, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations for this information 
collection request should be sent within 30 days of publication of this 
notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular 
information collection request by selecting ``Small Business 
Administration''; ``Currently Under Review,'' then select the ``Only 
Show ICR for Public Comment'' checkbox. This information collection can 
be identified by title and/or OMB Control Number.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: You may obtain a copy of the 
information collection and supporting documents from Curtis Rich, 
Agency Clearance Office, at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9bd8eee9eff2e8b5c9f2f8f3dbe8f9fab5fcf4ed"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c487b1b6b0adb7ea96ada7ac84b7a6a5eaa3abb2">[email protected]</span></a>; (202) 205-7030, or 
from www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Form 857 is used by SBA examiners to obtain 
information about financing provided by small business investment 
companies (SBICs). This information, which is collected directly from 
the financed small business, provides independent confirmation of 
information reported to SBA by SBICs, as well as additional information 
not reported by SBICs.
    Solicitation of Public Comments: Comments may be submitted on (a) 
whether the collection of information is necessary for the agency to 
properly perform its functions; (b) whether the burden estimates are 
accurate; (c) whether there are ways to minimize the burden, including 
through the use of automated techniques or other forms of information 
technology; and (d) whether there are ways to enhance the quality, 
utility, and clarity of the information.

OMB Control: 3245-0109.

    Title: ``Request for Information Concerning Portfolio Financing.''
    Description of Respondents: Small Business Investment Companies.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 857.
    Estimated Annual Responses: 2,250.
    Estimated Annual Hour Burden: 2,250.

Curtis Rich,
Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2022-13726 Filed 6-27-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EX-10.1





 Exhibit 10.1 
  


					
	



	  	AQUINOX PHARMACEUTICALS (CANADA) INC.	  	
	  	450 – 887 Great Northern Way	  	Tel   604.629.9223
	  	Vancouver, BC, Canada V5T 4T5	  	Fax   778-331-4486
	  		  	Web  www.aqxpharma.com

 May 8, 2019 
 David Main


               
          
  

               
         
                          
 Dear David, 

RE: Retention Bonus 
 On the condition you remain
employed and continue to provide service to Aquinox Pharmaceuticals (Canada) Inc. (the “Company”), the Company is prepared to provide you with a Retention bonus of US$401,250 (equating 1.5x your annual target bonus) paid to you on the
earlier of (a) a “Change of Control” (as defined in the Executive Employment Agreement, dated January 1, 2014, as amended, between you and Company (the “Employment Agreement”)) (b) consummation of a Board Approved
Strategic Alternative (c) December 31, 2019, or (d) termination of your employment by the Company without Cause (as defined in the Employment Agreement). 

For purposes of this letter agreement, a “Board Approved Strategic Alternative” means (a) any transaction or series of transactions approved by
the Board whereby the Company or its affiliate acquires, via merger, acquisition, license or otherwise, the rights to additional products, product candidates or development programs, even if such transaction or series of transactions is not a Change
of Control or (b) a return of capital, via dividend or otherwise, by Aquinox Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to its stockholders in an aggregate amount of at least 50% of its consolidated cash and cash equivalents. 

In addition, the first sentence of section 5(d) of your Employment Agreement is amended to insert the words “or Board Approved Strategic
Alternative” after the words “Change in Control” such that the first sentence of Section 5(d) reads as follows: “In the event of a Good Reason occurring within the period of twelve (12) months after a Change in Control
or Board Approved Strategic Alternative, you may terminate your employment by providing one month’s written notice to the Board” and, moreover, the definition of “Board Approved Strategic Alternative” as set forth
above is incorporated by reference into the Employment Agreement. 
 Should the Company determine that your services are necessary beyond the consummation
of a Board Approved Strategic Alternative, you and the Company will negotiate in good faith a separate consulting agreement on terms agreeable to both you and the Company. 

The above bonus program replaces the previous Company annual bonus program. 

Sincerely, 
  

	
	/s/ Robert Pelzer
	Robert Pelzer
	Chairman, Compensation Committee
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 5, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

REVISED JANUARY 18, 2006

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-60933

Summary Calendar

SIGFREDO ANTONIO GALLEGOS; IVETTE MITCHELLE

HONORES-WALAQUEZ; JOSE ANTONIO GALLEGOS-HONORES,

Petitioners,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

(A75 346 184)

(A75 346 185)

(A75 346 186)

Before BARKSDALE, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Sigfredo Antonio Gallegos, his wife, Ivette Mitchelle HonoresWalaquez, and his son, Jose Antonio Gallegos-Honores, seek review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) denial of their motion

to reconsider the denial of their motion to reopen their appeal.

The claim underlying their motion to reopen is for ineffective

assistance of counsel.
2

The Gallegoses claim the BIA abused its discretion in

determining that, because they failed to show they filed a

grievance with the Texas Bar Association against their former

attorney, they did not meet the third prong of Matter of Lozada, 19

I. & N. Dec. 637, 639 (BIA 1988). The Gallegoses contend they gave

a reasonable explanation for failing to state whether they filed a

grievance: Rule 2.16 of the Texas Rules of Disciplinary Procedure

states the filing and pendency of a grievance against an attorney

is completely confidential and may not be disclosed to any person

or entity except by court order or if the respondent waives

confidentiality. They also claim the BIA abused its discretion in

holding they failed to show prejudice resulting from their former

counsel’s failure to file a brief in their appeal to the BIA.

The BIA’s denial of a motion to reconsider is reviewed for

abuse of discretion. Zhao v. Gonzales, 404 F.3d 295, 301 (5th Cir.

2005) (motion to reconsider properly denied where petitioner “did

not identify a change in the law, a misapplication of the law, or

an aspect of the case that the BIA overlooked”). 

 The Gallegoses did not satisfy their burden of proof before

the BIA to demonstrate a prima facie case that, had the brief been

filed, they would have been entitled to relief from deportation.

Miranda-Lores v. I.N.S., 17 F.3d 84, 85 (5th Cir. 1994).

Therefore, the BIA did not abuse its discretion by determining the

Gallegoses failed to show prejudice. Goonsuwan v. Ashcroft, 252
3

F.3d 383, 385 n.2 (5th Cir. 2001) (to establish ineffective

assistance of counsel, alien must demonstrate counsel’s performance

resulted in substantial prejudice). Because the BIA did not abuse

its discretion in that determination, we need not decide whether

the BIA abused its discretion in determining the Gallegoses failed

to meet the third prong of Matter of Lozada.

DENIED
|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (a) | A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from April 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 has been made under my supervision. |

|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (b) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period. |

|                                                                                                                           |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                           |
| /s/ Ryan M. Hershberger                                                                                                   |
| Ryan M. HershbergerAssistant Treasurer ofFord Motor Credit Company LLC,as Servicer of Ford Credit Auto Lease Trust 2018-A |
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 10.10(b)

                            MILLENNIUM CHEMICALS INC.

                                  Amendment To

                     MILLENNIUM PETROCHEMICALS GRANDFATHERED
                     SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN

                                  (the "Plan")


         The Plan shall be, and it hereby is, amended effective June 1, 2002 as
follows:

1.       Section 11.3 Change in Control

         Amend clause (iv) of Section 11.3 to read in its entirety as follows:

         "(iv) the stockholders of the Company approve a plan of complete
         liquidation of the Company or the closing of the sale or disposition by
         the Company of all or substantially all of the Company's assets other
         than the sale or disposition of all or substantially all of the assets
         of the Company to one or more Subsidiaries (as defined below) of the
         Company or to a person or persons who beneficially own, directly or
         indirectly, at least fifty percent (50%) or more of the combined voting
         power of the outstanding voting securities of the Company at the time
         of the sale or disposition; provided, however, (y) the sale or
         disposition of all or any part of the Company's interests in Equistar
         Chemicals LLP ("Equistar") (and all subsequent sales and dispositions
         of any securities or assets received as proceeds thereof, or as
         proceeds of proceeds) shall not be deemed to constitute a Change in
         Control, and (z) if the Company sells or disposes of all or any part
         of the Company's interests in Equistar indirectly (either through the
         sale or other disposition of any entity that owns, directly or
         indirectly, all or any part of the Company's interests in Equistar, or
         otherwise), then the sale or disposition of the Company's interests in
         Equistar (and all subsequent sales and dispositions of any securities
         or assets received as proceeds thereof, or as proceeds of proceeds)
         shall be ignored and disregarded in determining whether any such Change
         in Control has occurred. By way of illustration, if an indirect
         subsidiary of the Company that owns the Company's interests in Equistar
         together with certain other assets is sold, then, in determining
         whether a Change in Control has occurred, all relevant determinations
         shall be made pursuant to the assumption that (y) such subsidiary owns
         only such other assets, and (z) neither such subsidiary nor the Company
         owns, either directly or indirectly, the interests in Equistar.
         "Subsidiary" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 424 of the
         Internal Revenue Code and the term shall also include any partnership,
         limited liability company or other business entity if the Company owns
         directly or indirectly, securities or other ownership interests
         representing at least fifty percent (50%) of the ordinary voting power
         or equity or capital interests of such entity."
##### 



EXHIBIT 21.1


SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT


|                                     |  |                       
|------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------
|Name                                 |  | State of Incorporation
|                                     |  |                       
|Carrier Access Operations Company    |  | Colorado              
|Carrier Access Distribution Company  |  | Colorado              
|Nevko, Inc.                          |  | Nevada                
|Carrier Access Holding Company       |  | Delaware              
|Paragon Networks International, Inc. |  | Delaware              
|Paragon Networks Canada Ltd.         |  | Canada                
|*CA Worldwide CV                     |  | Netherlands           






|  |                                                                                      
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|* | Partnership between Carrier Access Corporation and Carrier
    Access Holding Company
# C_2021400EN.01000201.xml

| 4.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 400/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 400/2

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

0,00 % on 1 October 2021

Euro exchange rates (2)

1 October 2021

(2021/C 400/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1600 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,97 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4372 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85653 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1538 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0791 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 149,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,0204 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,309 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 358,16 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5826 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9470 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 10,2583 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5985 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4698 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,0304 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6751 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5733 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 371,32 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,3449 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4781 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4980 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 563,71 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8482 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,752 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 84,7187 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,022 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,2816 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,7955 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 85,9750 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1600

JPY

Japanese yen

128,97

DKK

Danish krone

7,4372

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85653

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1538

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0791

ISK

Iceland króna

149,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,0204

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,309

HUF

Hungarian forint

358,16

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5826

RON

Romanian leu

4,9470

TRY

Turkish lira

10,2583

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5985

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4698

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,0304

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6751

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5733

KRW

South Korean won

1 371,32

ZAR

South African rand

17,3449

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4781

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4980

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 563,71

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8482

PHP

Philippine peso

58,752

RUB

Russian rouble

84,7187

THB

Thai baht

39,022

BRL

Brazilian real

6,2816

MXN

Mexican peso

23,7955

INR

Indian rupee

85,9750

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (1)

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the following certification is being made to
accompany the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
March 31, 2004:

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Continuum Group C Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
L. Frome, Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that to my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Robert L. Frome
------------------------------------
Name:  Robert L Frome
Title: Acting Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer
Date:  July 9, 2004

(1) A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Continuum Group C Inc. and will be retained by Continuum Group C
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
```
In the MATTER OF Disbarment of Jerry Steven PACKARD.

No. D-3048

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Disbarment order entered.
(a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, was made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report was being prepared;
 (b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 (c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 (d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal year that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.