alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE of North Carolina v. Khadijah Dara OWENS.

No. 78P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 24, 2004.

Kathryn L. VandenBerg, Raleigh, for Owens.

Spurgeon Fields, III, Assistant Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd day of February 2004 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."
STATE v. AGAN.

COA03-420.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 3, 2004.

Certification Date August 23, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
Independent Auditors' Consent



To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Smith Barney Managed Municipals Fund Inc.:

We consent to the use of our report dated April 20, 1998 for the Smith 
Barney Managed Municipals Fund Inc., incorporated herein by reference and to 
the references to our Firm under the headings "Financial Highlights" in the 
Prospectus and "Counsel and Auditors" in the Statement of Additional 
Information.




	KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


New York, New York
June 24, 1998
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q of Superior Essex Inc. (the “*Company*”) for the period ended March 31,2005 (the “*Periodic Report*”), I,Stephen M. Carter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, thatthe Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: May 9, 2005 | /s/ STEPHEN M. CARTER     |
|------------------------|---------------------------|
|                   | Stephen M. Carter         |
|                   | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

2

----
# C_2008303EN.01S00301.xml

| 26.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
**
**Exhibit 35.1**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-2 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, (the “Report”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify andrepresent that: 

 
 1.
A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as ofMay 23, 2018, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-2 and Wilmington Trust, National Association (the “Agreement”) during theperiod that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision. 

 
 2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theAgreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report. 

 

SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.

By:
 
/s/ Marc Womack

Name:
 
Marc Womack

Title:
 
EVP, Head of Operations

Date:
 
March 31, 2022

By:
 
/s/ Erik Laney

Name:
 
Erik Laney

Title:
 
Treasurer

Date:
 
March 31, 2022
**
Cleveland E. COLEY, Jr., and Wife Sharon Coley, and Edwin Davis v. CHAMPION HOME BUILDERS CO. F/K/A CHB Merger Corp., and Redman Homes, Inc. F/K/A Redman Mobile Homes, Inc.

No. 101P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 24, 2004.

J. Scott Hale, J. Alexander S. Barrett, Greensboro, for Champion Home Builders Co. et al.

Gary Shipman, William G. Wright, Wilmington, for Coley et al.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 3rd day of March 2004 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."
STATE of North Carolina v. Edward Lee BROOKS.

No. 98P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 1, 2004.

Edward Lee Brooks, Pro Se.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 1st day of March 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals (filed as Notice of Appeal With Leave of Court for De Novo Review), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of April 2004."
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHN ALFRED PANZER I, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND 

URBAN DEVELOPMENT; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-16993 

D.C. No. 3:15-cv-04033-MEJ 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Maria-Elena James, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted July 11, 2017***

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

John Alfred Panzer I appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing 

his action alleging federal and state law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** Panzer consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(c).

*** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUL 17 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-16993 

U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a dismissal for failure to 

comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8, McHenry v. Renne, 84 F.3d 1172, 

1177 (9th Cir. 1996), and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Panzer’s action 

for failure to comply with Rule 8, because the complaint does not contain “a short 

and plain statement of the claims showing that [Panzer] is entitled to relief.” Fed. 

R. Civ. Pro. 8(a)(2), (d)(1); McHenry, 84 F.3d at 1174 (affirming dismissal under 

Rule 8, and recognizing that “[p]rolix, confusing complaints . . . impose unfair 

burdens on litigants and judges”).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Panzer’s 

complaint without leave to amend because further amendment would be futile. See 

Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 656 F.3d 1034, 1041 (9th Cir. 2011) 

(setting forth standard of review and explaining that dismissal without leave to 

amend is proper when amendment would be futile).

All pending motions are denied. 

AFFIRMED.
Susan NORMAN v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.

No. 52P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 1, 2004.

William H. Borden, Special Deputy Attorney General, for NC DOT.

Daniel J. Park, Elkin, for Norman.

Prior report: 161 N.C.App. 211, 588 S.E.2d 42.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 12th day of February 2004 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review as to additional issues of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was *154entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of April 2004."
James TYSON, Jr., Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6529

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000810271
<NAME> SB Growth & Income Fund
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER>      003
   <NAME>Smith Barney Investment Series

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  Oct-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                       Oct-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>            1,215,777,189
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>           1,482,363,866
<RECEIVABLES>                       18,939,102
<ASSETS-OTHER>                     143,397,333
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   1,644,700,301
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>            32,346,918
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                      0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>          147,782,350
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                180,129,268
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                              0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>         1,092,644,397
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                   10,809
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                        0
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>              (58,299)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                       0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>            104,616,673
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                     0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>           267,368,262
<NET-ASSETS>                     1,464,571,033
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                   18,878,917
<INTEREST-INCOME>                      591,872
<OTHER-INCOME>                               0
<EXPENSES-NET>                      15,576,007
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>              3,894,782
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>           106,851,708
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>          (33,445,162)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>               77,301,328
<EQUALIZATION>                               0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                    0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                     0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                        0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                 10,809
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                  0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                          0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>             (46,121,807)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                (58,299)
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>          239,851,058
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                      0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                   0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                9,663,674
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                     15,576,007
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                   140,869
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                   18.490
<PER-SHARE-NII>                         (0.020)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                  0.570
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                     0.000
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                0.000
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                     0.000
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                     19.030
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                           1.71



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6607
JERRY LEE THACKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusRONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; JAMES E. BRIGGS, Manager of the Ombudsman Services Unit; P. L. HUFFMAN;E. C. MORRIS, Director/Deputy Director; RICHARD A. YOUNG, Regional Administrator, Western Region I; K. A. POLINSKY, Member #1, ICC; MEMBER #2, ICC, Illegible; MEMBER #3, ICC, Illegible; ROSS E. BRUNN, Meeting Chairman, ICC, Bland Correctional Center, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-96-231-R) Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: July 2, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerry Lee Thacker, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Thacker v. Angelone , No. CA-96-231-R (W.D. Va. Mar. 6, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Golden Oval Eggs, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended November 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Doug Leifermann, VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Doug Leifermann                       |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Doug Leifermann                           |
|   |   | *Vice  President/Chief Financial Officer* |

 

Date: January 16, 2006

 

1

----
Vicki CORONA, Petitioner, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, et al.

No. 19-6553

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Margarita MORA, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6674

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
STATE of North Carolina v. Monica D. BRANCH.

No. 95PA04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 1, 2004.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Belinda J. Foster, District Attorney, for State.

Barbara S. Blackman, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Branch.

Prior report: __ N.C.App. ___, 591 S.E.2d 923.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 5th day of March 2004 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of April 2004."
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1400 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1400

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify that children of 
  certain veterans are eligible for the Marine Gunnery Sergeant John 
                         David Fry scholarship.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 21, 2013

Mr. Young of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify that children of 
  certain veterans are eligible for the Marine Gunnery Sergeant John 
                         David Fry scholarship.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF MARINE GUNNERY SERGEANT JOHN DAVID FRY 
              SCHOLARSHIP.

    (a) In General.--Section 3311(b)(9) of title 38, United States 
Code, is amended by striking ``in line of duty'' and all that follows 
through the period and inserting ``as a result of a service-connected 
disability.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if included in the enactment of section 1002 of the 
Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (Public Law 111-32; 123 Stat. 
1889).
                                 <all>
```
Energy Holdings International, Inc. 10-Q



Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of Energy Holdings International, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31,
2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Adair,
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



(i) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:
May 20, 2015 |  | /s/
    John Adair                             
|------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------
|                   |  | John Adair                                     
|                   |  | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President



This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).
Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
Emanuel RIVERA-MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 18-9688

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
SLOAN FINANCIAL, et al. v. BECKETT.

No. 514A03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 17, 2004.

E.D. Gaskins, Jr., Michael J. Tadych, Raleigh, Richard H. Block, New York, NY, for Justice Beckett and Dorika Mamboleo.

LeAnn Nease Brown, Chapel Hill, Mark Fox Evens, Pro Hac Vice, William B. Kirk, Jr., Charlotte, Mary Margaret Utterback, Washington, DC, for Sloan Financial Group, Inc. et al, and Maceo K. Sloan.

Henry W. Jones, Hope Derby Carmichael, Paul T. Flick, Raleigh, Brigida Benitez, Pro Hac Vice, Anne Harkavy, Pro Hac Vice, Washington, DC, for New Africa Opportunity Fund, L.P. d/b/a ZM Africa Investment Fund, L.P.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th day of February 2004 by David R. Lagasse for Admission Pro Hac Vice:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 17th day of February 2004."
Andres SANTANA, Petitioner v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, et al.

No. 19-6425

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of
Fieldstone Investment Corporation (the Company), each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



| | (1) | The Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                           |  |                                                     
|------------------ |  | ------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 10, 2007 |  |                           |  |                                                     
|                   | 
|                   |  | /s/ Michael J. Sonnenfeld
|                   |  | Name:                     |  | Michael J. Sonnenfeld                               
|                   |  | Title:                    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer               
|                   | 
|                   |  | /s/ Nayan V. Kisnadwala  
|                   |  | Name:                     |  | Nayan V. Kisnadwala                                 
|                   |  | Title:                    |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
SANTOMASSIMO v. VALLEY FORGE LIFE INS.

No. 86P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 6, 2004.

Burley B. Mitchell, Pressly M. Millen, Samuel O. Southern, Raleigh, James G. Exum, Jr., Greensboro, for Valley Forge/CNA Life Ins. Co.

Robert B. Cordle, Charlotte, for American Council of Life Ins.

L.D. Simmons, II, Corby C. Anderson, Charlotte, for NC Citizens for Business and Industry and the North Carolina Association of Defense Attorneys.

Reginald B. Gillespie, Jr., Durham, for Rod N. Santomassimo.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 24th day of February 2004 by NC Citizens for Business & Industry for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

> "Motion Dismissed As Moot. By order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of May 2004."
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.2


                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

         I, Denise Barton, Chief Financial Officer of Atlantic Coast
Entertainment Holdings, Inc. and ACE Gaming, LLC, ( the "Registrants") certify
that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 of the Registrant (the "Report"):

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
                  (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Registrant.

/s/ Denise Barton
----------------------------------
Name: Denise Barton

Date: November 18, 2004




                                       1
STATE of North Carolina v. Henry Clifford BYRD, Sr.

No. 301P01-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2004.

Henry C. Byrd, Sr., Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 26th day of November 2003 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the Order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2004."