alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of GREEN ENERGY HOLDING CORP. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report'), I, Dennis C. Murphy, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated: NOVEMBER 13, 2008/s/ Dennis C. MurphyDennis
      C. Murphy, Chief
      Executive Officer
STATE v. Robert Charles SINAPI.

No. 274A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 10, 2004.

William B. Crumpler, Assistant Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jt., District Attorney, for State.

John T. Hall, Kyle Hall, Raleigh, for Robert Charles Sinapi.

Seth Jaffe, Raleigh, for ACLU-NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th day of August 2004 by American Civil Liberties Union of NC Legal Foundation, Inc. for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

> "Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 10th day of August 2004."
STATE of North Carolina v. Allen Wayne CRAWFORD.

No. 195P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 24, 2004.

Allen Wayne Crawford, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 27th day of April 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."
SMITH BARNEY INCOME FUNDS
on behalf of the
Smith Barney Convertible Fund (the "Fund")

Supplement dated April 18, 2001

to Prospectus dated November 28, 2000

The following information supersedes, as applicable, certain
information set forth in the Prospectus of the Fund listed above
under the section "Sales Charges - Class Y Shares."


Class Y shares
You buy Class Y shares at net asset value with no initial sales
charge and no deferred sales charge when you redeem. You must
meet the $5,000,000 initial investment requirement.


FD 02294

g:\legal\funds\slip\2001\secdocs\41701stk
Steven J. VARNAUSKAS, Petitioner v. ILLINOIS.

No. 19-5915

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 12, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District denied.
In the Matter of T.R.B.

No. 296A03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 6, 2004.

Laura E. Crumpler, Assistant Attorney General, for State.

Coe W. Ramsey, Seth Jaffe, Raleigh, for ACLU of NC Legal Found., Inc.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd day of March 2004 by Respondent to Dismiss The State's Appeal Regarding the Probation Condition Issue for Mootness:

> "Motion Dismissed As Moot by order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of May 2004."
In the Senate of the United States, 

September 10, 2014. 

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 1233) entitled ‘‘An Act to amend chapter 22 of 

title 44, United States Code, popularly known as the Presidential Records Act, to establish procedures for the consideration of claims of constitutionally based privilege against disclosure of Presidential records, and for other purposes.’’, do 

pass with the following 

AMENDMENTS: 

1 Ω1æOn page 5, line 7, strike øof¿ and insert on. 

2 Ω2æOn page 10 from line 8 through page 11 line 1, strike 

3 all and insert: 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The President, the Vice President, 

5 or a covered employee may not create or send a Presidential 

6 or Vice Presidential record using a non-official electronic 

7 message account unless the President, Vice President, or 

8 covered employee— 
2 

† HR 1233 EAS 

1 (1) copies an official electronic messaging ac2 count of the President, Vice President, or covered em3 ployee in the original creation or transmission of the 

4 Presidential record or Vice Presidential record; or 

5 (2) forwards a complete copy of the Presidential 

6 or Vice Presidential record to an official electronic 

7 messaging account of the President, Vice President, or 

8 covered employee not later than 20 days after the 

9 original creation or transmission of the Presidential 

10 or Vice Presidential record. 

11 (b) ADVERSE ACTIONS.—The intentional violation of 

12 subsection (a) by a covered employee (including any rules, 

13 regulations, or other implementing guidelines), as deter14 mined by the appropriate supervisor, shall be a basis for 

15 disciplinary action in accordance with subchapter I, II, or 

16 V of chapter 75 of title 5, as the case may be. 

17 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

18 (1) COVERED EMPLOYEE.—The term ‘‘covered 

19 employee’’ means— 

20 (A) the immediate staff of the President; 

21 (B) the immediate staff of the Vice Presi22 dent; 

23 (C) a unit or individual of the Executive 

24 Office of the President whose function is to ad25 vise and assist the President; and 
3 

† HR 1233 EAS 

1 (D) a unit or individual of the Office of the 

2 Vice President whose function is to advise and 

3 assist the Vice President. 

4 Ω3æOn page 11, line 2, strike ø1¿ and insert 2. 

5 Ω4æOn page 11, line 6, strike ø2¿ and insert 3. 

6 Ω5æOn page 11, line 9 through line 11, strike everything 

7 up to the first period. 

8 Ω6æOn page 31, line 8, strike øwithin five days¿ and in9 sert not later than 20 days. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H.R. 1233 

AMENDMENTS
Hayo NIE-HMOK and Yngik Hmok, guardian ad litem for H Yuen Nie-Hmok v. William Eugene AYERS.

No. 206-P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 24, 2004.

Justice H. Campbell, Charlotte, for Nie-Hmok and g/a/l for Nie-Hmok.

Christa C. Pratt, for William Eugene Ayers.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th day of May 2004 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals *401pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."
Fernando NUNEZ, Petitioner v. PENNSYLVANIA

No. 19-6362

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

*573Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office denied.
Robert Gordon JOHNSTONE, Petitioner v. NEVADA, et al.

No. 18-9324

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alesco Financial Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, James J. McEntee, III and John J. Longino, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: May 10, 2007



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ James J. McEntee, III                                  
|James J. McEntee, III Chief Executive Officer and
President



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/s/ John J. Longino                    
|John J. Longino Chief Financial
Officer
SMITH BARNEY ALLOCATION SERIES INC

ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT


	SMITH BARNEY ALLOCATION SERIES INC. a Maryland corporation,
having its principal office in Baltimore City, Maryland
(hereinafter called the "Corporation"), hereby certifies to the
State Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland that:

	FIRST: The Charter of the Corporation is hereby amended to
change the name of the Select High Growth Portfolio to Smith
Barney Allocation Select High Growth Portfolio, the name of the
Select Growth Portfolio to Smith Barney Allocation Select Growth
Portfolio and the name of the Select Balanced Portfolio to Smith
Barney Allocation Select Balanced Portfolio, each a series of the
Corporation.

	SECOND:  The foregoing amendment to the Charter of the
Corporation has been approved by a majority of the entire Board of
Directors of the Corporation and is limited to changes expressly
permitted by Section 2-605 of the Maryland General Corporation Law
to be made without action of the stockholders.

	THE UNDERSIGNED, the President of Smith Barney Allocation
Series Inc. acknowledges these Articles of Amendment to be the
corporate act of the Corporation and hereby certifies to the best
of his knowledge, information and belief that the matters and facts
set forth in these Articles of Amendment with respect to the
authorization and approval of the amendment to the Corporation's
Articles of Incorporation are true in all material respects under
the penalties of perjury.

	IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SMITH BARNEY CONCERT ALLOCATION SERIES
INC. has caused these Articles of Amendment to be executed and
acknowledged in its name and on its behalf by its President and
witnessed by its Assistant Secretary on this 15th day of February,
2001.



					SMITH BARNEY ALLOCATION SERIES INC.


					By:

					      Heath B. McLendon
					      President


WITNESS:

_____________________________
Barbara J. Allen
Assistant Secretary
Jeffrey Jason COOPER, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6303

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or coll ateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### OCT 7 1997 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk 

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

LEE WEBB, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v. PRISON HEALTH SERVICES; BRUCE WELLS, M.D., Defendants-Appellees. No. 97-3146 (D.C. No. 94-CV-3064-GTV)

(Kansas)



### ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before SEYMOUR , Chief Judge, PORFILIO and MURPHY , Circuit Judges.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materiallyassist the determination of this appeal. SeeFed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The c ause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Plaintiff Lee Webb appeals from the district court’ s summary judgment in1 We construe plaintiff’s “Amended and Supplemental P leadings” as a

motion to supplement the record on appeal and grantit. -2- favor of defendants on plaintiff’s claim that defen dants violated his rights under the Eighth Amendment to be free from cruel and unus ual punishment. 1 We have reviewed the record in light of plaintiff’s claims, and we agree with the district court that plaintiff has failed to establish the re quisite deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs required to support a con stitutional violation. We AFFIRM the judgment of the district court substantially f or the reasons given by the court in its Memorandum and or der dated May 6, 1997. ENTERED FOR THE COURT Stephanie K. Seymour Chief Judge
October 25, 1996
Smith Barney Aggressive Growth Fund Inc.
388 Greenwich Street
New York, New York 10013

                   Re:  Rule 24f-2 Notice
                              
Gentlemen:

    In connection with the filing by Smith Barney Aggressive
Growth Fund Inc., a Maryland corporation (the "Fund"), of a
Notice (the "Notice"), pursuant to Rule 24f-2 under the
Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Act"), for
the Fund's fiscal year ended August 31, 1996, the
undersigned hereby provides the legal opinion required by
that Rule.

     In accordance with Rule 24f-2, the Fund has registered
an indefinite number of shares of common stock, $0.001 par
value, under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"1933 Act"). The purpose of the Notice is to make definite
the registration of  18,674,450 shares of the Fund (the
"Shares") sold in reliance upon the Rule during the fiscal
year ended August 31, 1996.

     The undersigned is Deputy General Counsel of Smith
Barney Mutual Funds Management Inc., the Fund's
administrator, and in such capacity, from time to time and
for certain purposes, acts as counsel to the Fund. He has
examined copies of the Fund's Articles of Incorporation, its
By-Laws, resolutions adopted by its Board of Directors, and
such other records and documents as have been deemed
necessary for purposes of this opinion.  Furthermore, he has
examined a Certificate of the Controller of the Fund to the
effect that the Fund received the cash consideration for
each of the Shares in accordance with the aforementioned
organizational documents and resolutions.

     On the basis of the foregoing, and assuming all of the
Shares were sold in accordance with the terms of the Fund's
Prospectus in effect at the time of sale, he is of the
opinion that the Shares have been duly authorized and
validly issued and are fully paid and non-assessable.  This
opinion is for the limited purposes expressed above and
should not be deemed to be an expression of opinion as to
compliance with the 1933 Act, the 1940 Act or applicable
State "blue sky" laws in connection with the sales of the
Shares.


                                        Very truly yours,


                                        Robert Vegliante
                                        Deputy General
                                        Counsel
                                        of Smith Barney
Mutual Funds
Management Inc.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 26, 2016

No. 04

- 15

- 00630

- CR

Troy Stanley STAIR,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Cour t, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14

- 0709

- CR

- B

The Honorable William Old, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The court reporter’s request for an extension of 30 days is GRANTED. The reporter’s

record is due in this co urt on or before May 1 8 , 2016.

_________________________________ Maria lyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 26th day of April, 2016

.

___________________________________ Ke ith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

RACQUEL SINCLAIR VEALS

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NUMBER 4:24-CR-00048

ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY

The Court referred this matter to the United States Magistrate Judge for administration of 

a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a 

hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court accept 

Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment.

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings.

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of 

the United States Magistrate Judge. The court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance 

of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report.

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Racquel Sinclair 

Veals GUILTY of Count One of the Indictment, charging a violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 1920 –

False Statement or Fraud to Obtain Federal Employees’ Compensation.

Case 4:24-cr-00048-SDJ-AGD Document 27 Filed 08/26/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 65
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 147 

To repeal the Federal estate and gift taxes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2013 

Mr. THORNBERRY (for himself, Mr. BARTON, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Mr. 

CONAWAY, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky, Mr. SESSIONS, 

Mr. WOMACK, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, 

Mr. GRAVES of Georgia, Mr. JONES, Mr. NUGENT, Mr. ROE of Tennessee, Mr. ROKITA, Mr. YOUNG of Florida, Mr. MCKINLEY, Mr. OLSON, 

Mr. RAHALL, Mr. ROGERS of Alabama, Mr. ISSA, Mr. HALL, Mr. BACHUS, Mr. TURNER, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. DUNCAN of Tennessee, Mr. 

SMITH of Texas, and Mr. YODER) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To repeal the Federal estate and gift taxes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Death Tax Repeal 

5 Act’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HR 147 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF ESTATE AND GIFT TAXES. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subtitle B of the Internal Rev3 enue Code of 1986 (relating to estate, gift, and genera4 tion-skipping taxes) is hereby repealed. 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The repeal made by sub6 section (a) shall apply to estates of decedents dying, gifts 

7 made, and generation-skipping transfers made after the 

8 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Dollar  Financial  Corp.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Jeffrey A. Weiss
----------------------------------
Jeffrey A. Weiss
Chairman of the Board of Directors
and Chief Executive Officer
May 9, 2005
<PAGE>


Exhibit 24.1  Form of Power of Attorney


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                -----------------


                  KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose
signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints Dr. Ramon Harel, as his
attorney-in-fact, with full power of substitution, for him in any and all
capacities, to sign Form 10-KSB of Scanvec-Amiable, Ltd., and any and all
amendments thereto, and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact, or any
substitute, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

                  This Power of Attorney has been signed by the following
persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Signature                                   Title                               Date
---------                                   -----                               ----
<S>                                         <C>                             <C>
/s/ Benjamin Givli                          Director                        March 30, 2004
____________________________________
Benjamin Givli


/s/ Yoav Doppelt                            Director                        March 30, 2004
____________________________________
Yoav Doppelt


/s/ Moti Dabi                               Director                        March 30, 2004
____________________________________
Moti Dabi


/s/ Shmulik Aran                            Director                        March 30, 2004
____________________________________
Shmulik Aran


/s/ Aliza Rotbard                           Director                        March 30, 2004
____________________________________
Aliza Rotbard


/s/ Avi Heifetz                             Director                        March 30, 2004
____________________________________
Avi Heifetz
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atomic  Paintball,  Inc. on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission  on the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  David J.  Cutler,  Chief
Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: May 14, 2008



By:      /s/ David J. Cutler
         ----------------------------------
         David J. Cutler
         Chief Executive Officer, principal financial officer