alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
V 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1519 

For the relief of Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 11, 2013 

Mr. KING of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR 

4 ALEMSEGHED MUSSIE TESFAMICAL. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical shall be eligible for 

8 issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 

9 to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent resi10 dence upon filing an application for issuance of an immi11 grant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment 

12 of status to lawful permanent resident. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1519 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Alemseghed 

2 Mussie Tesfamical enters the United States before the fil3 ing deadline specified in subsection (c), he shall be consid4 ered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if 

5 otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status 

6 under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

7 as of the date of the enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical, the Secretary of 

16 State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, dur17 ing the current or next following fiscal year, the total num18 ber of immigrant visas that are made available to natives 

19 of the country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) 

20 of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, 

21 the total number of immigrant visas that are made avail22 able to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under 

23 section 202(e) of such Act. 

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1519 IH

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Alemseghed Mussie 

2 Tesfamical shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be ac3 corded any right, privilege, or status under the Immigra4 tion and Nationality Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1528 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1528

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                                 An Act

 
   To amend the Controlled Substances Act to allow a veterinarian to 
  transport and dispense controlled substances in the usual course of 
         veterinary practice outside of the registered location.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterinary Medicine Mobility Act of 
2014''.
SEC. 2. TRANSPORT AND DISPENSING OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES IN THE USUAL 
COURSE OF VETERINARY PRACTICE.
    Section 302(e) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 822(e)) 
is amended--
        (1) by striking ``(e)'' and inserting ``(e)(1)''; and
        (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a registrant who is a 
veterinarian shall not be required to have a separate registration in 
order to transport and dispense controlled substances in the usual 
course of veterinary practice at a site other than the registrant's 
registered principal place of business or professional practice, so 
long as the site of transporting and dispensing is located in a State 
where the veterinarian is licensed to practice veterinary medicine and 
is not a principal place of business or professional practice.''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6776

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LEROY GRIFFIN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater, District Judge. (3:02-cr-00036-WCB; 3:03-cv-00072-WCB) Submitted: December 22, 2006 Decided: January 30, 2007 Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Brian Joseph Kornbrath, Federal Public Defender, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellant. Robert H. McWilliams, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Leroy Griffin seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Griffin has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
List of significant subsidiaries of the Registrant





|Group
    Company Name                      | Country
    of incorporation
|------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------
|WISeKey SA                                  | Switzerland                 
|WISeKey Semiconductors SAS                  | France                      
|WiseTrust SA                                | Switzerland                 
|WISeKey (Suisse) SA**                       | Switzerland                 
|WISeKey ELA SL                              | Spain                       
|WISeKey SAARC Ltd                           | U.K.                        
|WISeKey USA Inc*                            | U.S.A                       
|WISeKey India Private Ltd***                | India                       
|WISeKey KK                                  | Japan                       
|WISeKey Taiwan                              | Taiwan                      
|WISeCoin AG                                 | Switzerland                 
|WISeKey Equities AG                         | Switzerland                 
|WISeCoin France R&D Lab SAS                 | France                      
|WISeKey Semiconductors GmbH                 | Germany                     
|WISeKey Arabia - Information Technology Ltd | Saudi Arabia                

*50% owned by WISeKey SA and 50% owned by
WiseTrust SA

** dormant or in the process of being liquidated

*** 88% owned by WISeKey SAARC which is controlled by WISeKey International
Holding AG
Exhibit



EXHIBIT 10a




430 East 29 Street   New York, New York 10016




Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent
388 Greenwich Street
New York, New York 10013
Attention: Richard Rivera






May 31, 2019


Ladies and Gentlemen:


Re: Extension of Maturity Date


Reference is made to the Five Year Competitive Advance and Revolving Credit Facility Agreement, dated as of September 29, 2011 (as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified prior to the date hereof, the "Credit Agreement") among Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), the Borrowing Subsidiaries, the lenders parties thereto (the "Lenders"), certain Agents, Citibank, N.A., as an Administrative Agent, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as an Administrative Agent. Capitalized term used but not defined herein shall have the meaning assigned to such term in the Credit Agreement.


Pursuant to Section 2.5 of the Credit Agreement, the Company hereby requests that the Lenders extend the Maturity Date in effect on the date hereof (i.e., September 30, 2022) such that the extended Maturity Date under the Credit Agreement will be September 29, 2023. This letter shall constitute an "Extension Letter" as referred to in Section 2.5 of the Credit Agreement.




	
		
	Very truly yours,

	 

	BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY

	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ Jeffrey Galik

	 
	Name: Jeffrey Galik

	 
	Title: Senior Vice President and Treasurer
# Official Journal C 28/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.028.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 28 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5428 January 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.028.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 28

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5428 January 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 028/01 | Guidance on the preparation of an application for authorisation | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2011/C 028/01

Guidance on the preparation of an application for authorisation

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# C_2018321EN.01000301.xml

| 11.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 321/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 321/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8983 — Spigas/Canarbino/Miogas)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 321/02)

On 31 August 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8983. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8983. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Neil GRENNING, Petitioner v. James KEY, Superintendent, Airway Heights Corrections Center.

No. 19-6385

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. §1350
 
 (SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)
 
 I, Travis
Cai, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of China-Biotics,
Inc. (the “Registrant”), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based upon a
review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31,
2010 of the Registrant (the “Report”):
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  /s/
      Travis CaiTravis
      CaiChief
      Financial OfficerFebruary
      14, 2011
EXHIBIT
32.2
  CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. §1350
 
 (SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)
 
 I,
Lewis Fan, Chief Financial Officer (principal executive officer) of
China-Biotics, Inc. (the "Registrant"), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based
upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June
30, 2008 of the Registrant (the “Report”):
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of The
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.
 
 A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
 /s/ Lewis
      FanLewis
      FanChief
      Financial OfficerMarch
      20, 2009
EXHIBIT 32.1



LUDUSON G INC.

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual
Report of Luduson G Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Man Fai CHENG, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.





| | By: | /s/ Man Fai CHENG                                                          
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     | Man Fai CHENG
    Chief Executive Officer
    (Principal Executive Officer)



Date:  March 28, 2024
STATE of North Carolina v. Dwayne Russell EDWARDS.

No. 276P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 12, 2004.

Duncan B. McCormick, Lillington, for Dwayne Russell Edwards.

Tina A. Krasner, Assistant Attorney General, Carl R. Fox, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 8th day of June 2004 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th day of August 2004."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th day of June 2004 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th day of August 2004."
STATE of North Carolina v. Billy Lee LISENBY, Jr.

No. 428P03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 4, 2003.

Billy Lee Lisenby, Jr., Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Kenneth W. Honeycutt, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Richmond County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of December 2003."
Ahmadou SANKARA, Petitioner v. William P. BARR, Attorney General

No. 19-5005

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Bank MELLI, Petitioner, v. Michael BENNETT, et al.

No. 19-807.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied. Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1392 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1392

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 2539 Dartmoor Road in Grove City, Ohio, as the ``Master Sergeant 
     Shawn T. Hannon and Veterans Memorial Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 21, 2013

 Mr. Stivers (for himself, Mr. Chabot, Mr. Wenstrup, Mrs. Beatty, Mr. 
  Jordan, Mr. Latta, Mr. Johnson of Ohio, Mr. Gibbs, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. 
 Turner, Ms. Fudge, Mr. Tiberi, Mr. Ryan of Ohio, Mr. Renacci, and Mr. 
    Joyce) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 2539 Dartmoor Road in Grove City, Ohio, as the ``Master Sergeant 
     Shawn T. Hannon and Veterans Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MASTER SERGEANT SHAWN T. HANNON AND VETERANS MEMORIAL POST 
              OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2539 Dartmoor Road in Grove City, Ohio, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Master Sergeant Shawn T. Hannon and Veterans 
Memorial Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Master 
Sergeant Shawn T. Hannon and Veterans Memorial Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
Jennie NICASSIO, Petitioner v. VIACOM INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al.

No. 19-560

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED November 9, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40232 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus BENITO AVILA-SALDANA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:04-CR-511-ALL

-------------------- Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Benito Avila-Saldana appeals his guilty-plea conviction of illegal reentry into the United States after having been deported. Avila-Saldana argues that Almendarez-Torres v. United
States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), has been undercut by later Supreme Court opinions, particularly Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Thus, he argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional. Avila-Saldana recognizes that relief is foreclosed but statesNo. 05-40232 -2- that he wishes to raise the issue for possible further review in the Supreme Court. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90 . We must follow the precedent set in Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” United States v. Mancia-Perez , 331 F.3d 464, 470 (5th Cir. 2003) (quotation marks and citation omitted). Therefore, Avila-Saldana’s argument fails. See id. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350





(SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





I, Song
Jinan, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of China-Biotics,
Inc. (the "Registrant"), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based upon a
review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30,
2008 of the Registrant (the “Report”):





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of The
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/ Song
      JinanSong
      JinanChief
      Executive OfficerMarch 20,
      2009