alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000919557
<NAME> MFS Total Return Portflio
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER>010
   <NAME>Travelers Series Fund Inc.

<S>                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>          Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 Oct-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                      Oct-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>             650,972,426
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>            696,797,091
<RECEIVABLES>                      12,282,189
<ASSETS-OTHER>                        112,257
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    709,191,537
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>           11,431,834
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>             749,934
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                12,181,768
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                             0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>          603,537,236
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>              40,607,925
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>              38,345,904
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>          21,793,821
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                      0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>            25,830,761
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                    0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>           45,847,951
<NET-ASSETS>                      697,009,769
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                   7,477,463
<INTEREST-INCOME>                  19,539,872
<OTHER-INCOME>                              0
<EXPENSES-NET>                      5,274,284
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>            21,743,051
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>           26,277,888
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>          30,253,690
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>              78,274,629
<EQUALIZATION>                              0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>          17,520,200
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>           21,749,058
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                       0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>             3,058,479
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>         3,292,914
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                 2,496,456
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>             75,181,388
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>            17,561,649
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>          21,311,252
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                     0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                  0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>               5,085,377
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                     5,274,284
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>              632,366,232
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                  16.220
<PER-SHARE-NII>                         0.540
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                 1.430
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                    0.460
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>               0.570
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                    0.000
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                    17.160
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                          0.83



</TABLE>
STATE v. Robert Wayne STANLEY.

No. 376P02-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 4, 2003.

Melissa L. Trippe, Assistant Attorney General, for State.

Motion by Petitioner to Appoint Counsel has been filed and the following order entered:

> "Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 4th day of December 2003."
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

The undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)           The accompanying Golden Oval Eggs, LLC Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           The information contained in the accompanying report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date:  | July 16, 2007                         |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   |                                  |
|   |                                  |
|   | /s/ Dana Persson                      |   |
|   | Dana Persson                          |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                                  |
|   | /s/ Thomas A. Powell                  |   |
|   | Thomas A. Powell                      |
|   | Chief Financial Officer               |
|        |                                       |  |  |

 

----
Scott PETERS, Petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 18-9038

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
COURT OF APPEALS FOIl TIlE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Vikas Anand, Raymond Drennon, and Radha Thiagarajan

Appellate case number: 01-12-01106-CV

Trial court case number: 1023395

Trial court: County Court at Law No. 2 of Harris County

Relators have filed a motion for emergency relief, seeking a stay of the trial court’s

December 4, 2.0!2 order requiring production of.documents by December 13, 2012 and setting

relators’ depositions for December 18, 2012. Thiscourt grants the emergency relief and stays

the production of documents and depositions until further order of this court.

The court requests a response to the petition for writ of mandamus. The response, if any,

must be filed by January 4, 2t)13.

It ~s so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: Is/Rebeca Huddle

[] Acting individually [] Acting for the Court

Date: December 12, 2012
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
Smith Barney Managed Governments Fund Inc.:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements
of the Smith Barney Managed Governments Fund Inc. (the "Fund")
for the year ended July 31, 1999, we considered its internal
control, including control activities for safeguarding
securities, in order to determine our auditing procedures for the
purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and
to comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide
assurance on the internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles. Those controls include the safeguarding of
assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or
fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any
evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to
the risk that it may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in the internal control that might be
material weaknesses under standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness
is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of
the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively
low level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in
amounts that would be material in relation to the financial
statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a
timely period by employees in the normal course of performing
their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters involving
the internal control and its operation, including controls for
safeguarding securities that we consider to be material
weaknesses as defined above.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management, the Board of Directors of the Fund, and the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not intended to be and
should not be used by anyone other than the specified parties.



September 14, 1999
Timothy McKYER v. Fontella McKYER.

No. 516P03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 4, 2004.

Marnite Shuford, for Timothy McKyer.

Billie Ray Ellerbe, Charlotte, for Fontella McKyer.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th day of September 2003 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of March 2004."
Samier Patrick CLARK, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6632

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Dean A. SCHWARTZMILLER, Petitioner v. CALIFORNIA

No. 18-9285

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

The petition for rehearing is denied.
UNANIMOUS CONSENT IN LIEU OF A SPECIAL
                             MEETING OF DIRECTORS OF
                           CHAMPIONLYTE HOLDINGS, INC

      The undersigned, being all of the directors of CHAMPIONLYTE HOLDINGS,
INC., a corporation of the State of Florida, ("CORPORATION"), does hereby
authorize and approve the actions set forth in the following resolutions without
the formality of convening a meeting, and does hereby consent to the following
action of this Corporation, which actions are hereby deemed effective as of the
date hereof:

            RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the CORPORATION hereby
      approves the issuance of 10,000 shares of common stock of the CORPORATION
      to Edward Donato for consulting services rendered to the CORPORATION. Such
      shares are restricted in accordance with Rule 144 of the Securities Act of
      1933.

            FURTHER RESOLVED, that each of the officers of the CORPORATION be,
      and they hereby are authorized and empowered to execute and deliver such
      documents, instruments and papers and to take any and all other action as
      they or any of them may deem necessary or appropriate for the purpose of
      carrying out the intent of the foregoing resolutions; and that the
      authority of such officers to execute and deliver any such documents,
      instruments and papers and to take any such other action shall be
      conclusively evidenced by their execution and delivery thereof or their
      taking thereof.

      The undersigned, by affixing their signatures hereto, do hereby consent
to, authorize and approve the foregoing actions in their capacity as all of the
directors of CHAMPIONLYTE HOLDINGS, INC.

Dated: June 15, 2003


s/s David Goldberg                      s/s Thad Kaplan
-----------------------------------     ----------------------------------------
DAVID GOLDBERG                          THAD KAPLAN


s/s Steve Field
-----------------------------------     ----------------------------------------
STEVE FIELD                             MARSHALL KANNER
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Ricardo G. Brutocao, President and Chief Executive Officer(principal executive officer) of CENTERGISTIC SOLUTIONS, INC. (the “Company”),certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2004;

 

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

b)             Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)              All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)             Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:  November 10, 2004

 

 
| By:    | /s/ Ricardo G. Brutocao |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Ricardo G. Brutocao     |
|   | President, CEO          |

 

----
Exhibit 35.1

AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE 

SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT AND

ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

I, Paul C. Honda, do hereby certify that I am the Vice President and Assistant Secretary of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation (the “Company”), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer” and “Sponsor”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of February 28, 2018 among the Servicer and Sponsor, American Honda Receivables LLC, as Seller, and Honda Auto Receivables 2018-1 Owner Trust, as follows:

|   | (i) | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period ended March 31, 2019, and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period in all material respects. |
|--------|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 17th day of May, 2019.

 

|   | /s/ Paul C. Honda                                    |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Paul C. Honda                                        |  |
|   | Vice President and Assistant Secretary               |  |
|   | (senior officer in charge of the servicing function) |  |
Independent Auditors' Consent



To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
Smith Barney Municipal Fund, Inc.:

We consent to the use of our report dated February 10, 1998 for 
Smith Barney Municipal Fund, Inc. incorporated herein by 
reference and to the references to our Firm under the headings 
"Financial Highlights" and "Independent Auditors" in the 
Prospectus.




	KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


New York, New York
April 21, 1998
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 44 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 44

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                      regarding the right to vote.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 14, 2013

  Mr. Pocan (for himself, Mr. Ellison, Mr. Clay, Ms. Edwards, Mr. Al 
   Green of Texas, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Ms. Lee of 
California, Mr. McGovern, and Ms. Schakowsky) introduced the following 
 joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                      regarding the right to vote.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Every citizen of the United States, who is of legal 
voting age, shall have the fundamental right to vote in any public 
election held in the jurisdiction in which the citizen resides.
    ``Section 2. Congress shall have the power to enforce and implement 
this article by appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 70251 

FILED 

JUN 2 7 2016 

IE K. LINDEMAN 

ESUPflE caGLIRT 

CHIEF() 

CL 

IRENA PIMKOVA, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

CRAIG A. BUSCH, 

Respondent. 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

This appeal was docketed in this court on April 26, 2016, 

without payment of the requisite filing fee. On that same day a notice was 

issued directing appellant to pay the filing fee within ten days. The notice 

further advised that failure to pay the filing fee within ten days would 

result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the 

filing fee or otherwise responded to this court's notice. Accordingly, cause 

appearing, this appeal is dismissed. 

It is so ORDERED. 

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT 

TRACE K. LINDEMAN 

BY: 15atili ■IkAnctic, 

cc: Hon. Timothy C. Williams, District Judge 

Irena Pimkova 

Pyatt Silvestri 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

CLERK'S ORDER Zcolz 

(0)-1947
Independent Auditors' Consent



To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Greenwich Street California Municipal Fund Inc.:

We consent to the use of our report dated October 15, 1998, with 
respect to Greenwich Street California Municipal Fund Inc., 
incorporated herein by reference and to the references to our Firm 
under the headings "Financial Highlights" and "Experts" in the 
Prospectus.





	KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


New York, New York
November 16, 1998
# Official Journal L 119I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 119I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6317 April 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 119I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6317 April 2020

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/538 of 17 April 2020 amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020 as regards the scope of the Global Margin for Commitments | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/538 of 17 April 2020 amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020 as regards the scope of the Global Margin for Commitments

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
TAENG YANG, Petitioner v. Michael MCNEILL, et al.

No. 19-6324

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
STATE of North Carolina v. Charles Michael CASSELL, III.

No. 456P03-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 4, 2004.

Barbara S. Blackman, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Charles Cassell, III.

Jeffrey R. Edwards, Assistant Attorney General, Garry W. Frank, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 30th day of January 2004 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of March 2004."
Exhibit 99.01

CONSENT OF THE LION FUND II, L.P.

Board of Directors

Biglari Holdings Inc.

17802 IH 10 West, Suite
400

San Antonio, Texas 78257



Members of the Board:

We
hereby consent to the use by Biglari Holdings Inc. of the audited financial statements of The Lion Fund II, L.P. as of and for
the periods ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 appearing in the Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 filed
by Biglari Holdings Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any amendment thereto.

| | The Lion Fund II, L.P.
| | ----------------------
| |                       
| | By:                   
| | By:                   
| |                       
| |
Alfonso SANCHEZ, Petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 19-5660

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 21, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office denied.