alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.2**














**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL**


**OFFICER
      REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING**


**FINANCIAL
      STATEMENTS**









I,
      Jeffrey T. Fisher, the Chief Financial Officer of CCO Holdings, LLC and CCO
      Holdings Capital Corp. (the "Company") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      hereby certify that, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
      period ended March 31, 2007 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission:




|· | fully
              complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
              Act of 1934; and
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|· | the
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------








/s/
      Jeffrey T.
      Fisher


Jeffrey
      T. Fisher


Chief
      Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial Officer)


May 15 ,
      2007
**Exhibit 32(b)****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the filing of this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. (the“Company”) for the period ended July 1, 2005,with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Joseph S. Cantie, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:          1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and           2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,    in all material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of the Company.     /s/ JOSEPH S. CANTIE       Joseph S. Cantie *Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer* *(Principal Financial Officer)*Date: August 2, 2005
Scott E. SCHMIDT, Petitioner v. Brian FOSTER, Warden.

No. 18-8977

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
STATE v. Scott David ALLEN.

No. 115A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 18, 2004.

William N. Farrell, Special Deputy Attorney General, Garland N. Yates, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 15th day of March 2004 by Defendant for Extension of Time for Court Reporter to Prepare the Transcript:

> "Motion Allowed. Court reporter shall have up to and including the 21st day of April 2004 to prepare and deliver transcript to counsel. By order of the Court in conference this the 18th day of March 2004."
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document
  



Exhibit 10.67  


 
 

AMENDMENT 2003-I    
    
    BECKMAN COULTER, INC.
  EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN    
    


        WHEREAS, Beckman Coulter, Inc. (the "Company"), a Delaware corporation, maintains the Beckman Coulter, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan
(the "Plan"); and 


        WHEREAS,
the Company now desires to amend the Plan to provide that any premium units credited under the Plan with respect to deferrals of compensation on and after the Company's 2004
annual meeting of stockholders (scheduled for April 1, 2004) be settled in cash as opposed to shares of Company stock in order to comply with the stockholder approval requirements of the New
York Stock Exchange; 


        WHEREAS,
the Company has the right to amend the Plan; 


        NOW,
THEREFORE, Section 6.1(b) of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows, effective immediately: 



"(b)
Manner of Distribution. The amount to be paid to the Participant shall be the vested portion of the Participant's Accounts. The form of payment of any distribution required pursuant to this Plan
(including, for this purpose, any distribution in respect of a withdrawal pursuant to Section 6.3) shall be determined as follows: 



	(i)
	Amounts
not denominated as Stock Units as of the date of distribution shall be paid in cash and valued as of the date the amount of the distribution is determined.



	(ii)
	If,
as of the date of distribution, benefits continue to be denominated as Stock Units, then the benefit attributable to the Stock Units credited to a Participant's
Accounts shall, subject to the next sentence, be distributed in shares of Common Stock. Premium Units (including Dividend Equivalent Stock Units) that are credited in respect of a Bonus and/or
Sign-On Credit on or after April 1, 2004, as well as any fractional Stock Unit interest, shall be settled in cash. The settlement amount of any such Stock Unit to be settled in cash
shall equal the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock determined as of the date used by the trustee of the Trust to determine the taxable income reportable with respect to such distribution." 





        RESOLVED
FURTHER, that clauses (i) and (ii) in Section 6.3(c) of the Plan are hereby deleted in their entirety, effective immediately. 


        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment 2003-I is hereby adopted this 17th day of December, 2003. 



	 	 	BECKMAN COULTER, INC.
	

 	
 	

By	
 	

/s/FIDENCIO M. MARES

	

 	
 	

Its	
 	

Vice President—Human Resources And Corporate Communications




1









QuickLinks


AMENDMENT 2003-I BECKMAN COULTER, INC. EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 14-1261

Filed December 23, 2015

STATE OF IOWA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

SHEVIN DARNELL CASTON,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County, Bradley J. 

Harris, Judge.

Shevin Darnell Caston appeals from the concurrent sentences imposed. 

AFFIRMED.

Mark C. Smith, State Appellate Defender, and Nan Jennisch, Assistant 

Appellate Defender, for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Kelli Huser, Assistant Attorney 

General, for appellee.

Considered by Potterfield, P.J., and Doyle and Tabor, JJ.
2

POTTERFIELD, Presiding Judge.

Shevin Darnell Caston appeals from the concurrent sentences imposed 

following his pleas of guilty to the offenses of felon in possession of a firearm and 

carrying weapons, contending the district court failed to provide adequate 

reasons for the sentences imposed. 

A sentence that conforms to the statute “is cloaked with a strong 

presumption in its favor, and will only be overturned for an abuse of discretion or 

the consideration of inappropriate matters.” State v. Formaro, 638 N.W.2d 720, 

724 (Iowa 2002). If we are not able to review the district court’s reasoning, we 

are unable to determine if there has been an abuse of discretion. State v. 

Thacker, 862 N.W.2d 402, 407 (Iowa 2015). Thus, Iowa Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 2.23(3)(d) requires the district court to state its reasons for selecting a 

particular sentence. “A statement may be sufficient, even if terse and succinct, 

so long as the brevity of the court’s statement does not prevent review of the 

exercise of the trial court’s sentencing discretion.” State v. Johnson, 445 N.W.2d 

337, 343 (Iowa 1989). Boilerplate reasons alone are not sufficient. See State v. 

Lumadue, 622 N.W.2d 302, 304 (Iowa 2001). 

Here, the district court noted Caston had previous involvement in 

“dangerous activities,” had served a prior sentence of incarceration that “should 

be enough to send a message to you,” and upon release had again chosen to 

carry a firearm knowing he was not permitted to do so. The court stated that “for 

the protection of society, it’s just necessary that you serve some term of 

incarceration.” The court observed, “[T]here’s simply consequences for what you 

did, and in this case it’s going to prison.” The sentencing order states that this 
3

particular sentence was “most likely to protect society and rehabilitate the 

defendant based upon the nature of the offense, defendant’s prior record, and 

the recommendation of the parties and the [presentence investigation report].” 

We are not prevented from reviewing the district court’s reasoning and we find no 

abuse of discretion in the sentence imposed. We therefore affirm.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit










EXHIBIT 10.1 


Schedule of Non-Employee Directors’ Annual Compensation 
effective as of June 25, 2019


	
					
	Annual compensation for Board service

	Role
	 
	Cash
	 
	Equity

	Non-employee directors 
	 
	$100,000
	 
	$215,000

	Chairman of the Board
	 
	$180,000
	 
	$295,000

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Additional compensation for committee service

	Committee
	 
	Chair
	 
	Member

	Audit
	 
	$35,000
	 
	$17,500

	HRCC
	 
	$30,000
	 
	$15,000

	NCG
	 
	$25,000
	 
	$12,500




Cash compensation is paid in advance in January for the first half of the year and in arrears in December for the second half of the year. The annual retainer and any committee retainer fees are prorated for partial year Board or committee service. Under the Mastercard Incorporated Deferral Plan, non-employee directors are eligible to defer all or part of their cash compensation into a non-qualified deferred compensation arrangement. Directors who elect to defer cash compensation receive earnings on their deferrals based on investment elections. None of the investment options provides returns considered to be above-market or preferential.
Annual stock grants are immediately vested and in the form of restricted stock or deferred stock units under Mastercard’s Amended and Restated 2006 Non-Employee Director Equity Compensation Plan. Each director selects the form of his or her award during an annual election process.
Non-employee directors are eligible to have Mastercard make matching gift contributions of up to $15,000 annually to eligible charities in the name of the director. In addition, non-employee directors are eligible to have Mastercard make contributions up to $5,000 to a charity of their choice to match director contributions to Mastercard’s Political Action Committee. Directors are reimbursed for expenses related to attending Board and committee meetings.
STATE of North Carolina v. Jon Frazier COFFEY.

No. 648P03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2004.

Jon Frazier Coffey, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 8th day of December 2003 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the Order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> 
*82
"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2004."
William L. ROBINSON, Jr., Petitioner v. Thomas P. DORE

No. 19M79

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 16, 2019

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Elsie M. LEE v. Richard O'BRIEN, and wife, Hazel O'Brien.

No. 377P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 12, 2004.

Elsie M. Lee, Pro Se.

Richard O'Brien, Pro Se.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 26th day of July 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th day of August 2004."

Upon consideration of the amended petition filed by Plaintiff on the 2nd day of August 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th day of August 2004."
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
The Travelers Series Trust:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements
of Travelers Quality Bond Portfolio, Lazard International Stock
Portfolio, MFS Emerging Growth Portfolio, Federated High Yield
Portfolio, Federated Stock Portfolio and Mid Cap Disciplined
Equity Fund of The Travelers Series Trust (the "Trust") for the
year ended December 31, 1997, we considered its internal control,
including control activities for safeguarding securities, in
order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of
expressing our opinion on the financial statements and to comply
with the requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on
the internal control.

The management of the Trust is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles. Those controls include the safeguarding of
assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or
irregularities may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection
of any evaluation of internal control to future periods is
subject to the risk that it may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and
operation may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in the internal control that might be
material weaknesses under standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness
is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of
the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively
low level the risk that errors or irregularities in amounts that
would be material in relation to the financial statements being
audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by
employees in the normal course of performing their assigned
functions.  However, we noted no matters involving the internal
control and its operation, including controls for safeguarding
securities that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined
above.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management, the Board of Trustees of the Trust, and the
Securities and Exchange Commission.




February 10, 1998
Jonathan TORRES-ARROYO, Petitioner v. NEW JERSEY

No. 19-5889

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division denied.
EXHIBIT 32

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         The undersigned, John M. Sharpe, Jr., hereby certifies as follows:

         1. I am the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of
Inner Systems, Inc. (the "Company").

         2. To the best of my knowledge, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the "Report") complies in all
material respects with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

         3. To the best of my knowledge based upon a review of the Report, the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period
audited.


 SIGNATURE                              TITLE                        DATE

 /s/ JOHN M. SHARPE, JR.        President, Chief Executive      August 23, 2004
 -----------------------        Officer and Chief
 JOHN M. SHARPE, JR.            Financial Officer
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 12002E100

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Three: Community policies - Title VII: Economic and monetary policy - Chapter 1: Economic policy - Article 100 - Article 103a - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) -***Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0072 - 0072 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0216 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0034 - Consolidated version*

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Three: Community policies

Title VII: Economic and monetary policy

Chapter 1: Economic policy

Article 100

Article 103a - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 100 

1. Without prejudice to any other procedures provided for in this Treaty, the Council, acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission, may decide upon the measures appropriate to the economic situation, in particular if severe difficulties arise in the supply of certain products.

2. Where a Member State is in difficulties or is seriously threatened with severe difficulties caused by natural disasters or exceptional occurrences beyond its control, the Council, acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission, may grant, under certain conditions, Community financial assistance to the Member State concerned. The President of the Council shall inform the European Parliament of the decision taken.
CENTURION FUNDS, INC.
on behalf of the
Centurion U.S. Equity Fund
Centurion International Equity Fund
Centurion U.S. Contra Fund
Centurion International Contra Fund

Supplement to the
Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information,
each dated January 29, 2001

The following supersedes certain information contained in the
Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information of the Funds
listed above:

The Board of Directors of SSB Citi Fund Management LLC ("SSB
Citi"), each Fund's administrator, has voted to change the name
of SSB Citi to Smith Barney Fund Management LLC effective April
4, 2001.




Dated: April 5, 2001
STATE v. DOUGLAS.

No. COA03-329.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 7, 2004.

Certification Date September 27, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
Clarence Leonard HEARNS, Jr., Petitioner v. K. HARRINGTON, Warden

No. 19-6222

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.21

                             FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
                      STOCK OPTION PLAN OF DEX MEDIA, INC.

                  Dex Media, Inc. (the "Company"), a corporation organized under
the laws of the State of Delaware, has previously adopted the Stock Option Plan
of Dex Media, Inc. (as amended from time to time, the "Plan").

                  In order to amend the Plan in certain respects, this First
Amendment to the Plan has been adopted by a resolution of the Board of Directors
of the Company on September 9, 2003, effective as set forth below. This First
Amendment to the Plan, together with the Plan, constitutes the entire Plan as
amended to date.

                  1.       Effective as of September 9, 2003, the first sentence
of Section 2.1 of the Plan is hereby amended by replacing the number "234,591"
with the number "469,182".

                                 * * * * * * * *

                  Executed on September 9, 2003.

                                               DEX MEDIA, INC.

                                               By:  /s/ George Burnett
                                                  -----------------------------
                                               George Burnett, CEO and President
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

** **

**World Omni Financial Corp.**

**Servicer Compliance Statement**

**Pursuant to Item 1123**

**of Regulation AB**

** **

I, Joseph A. Venezia,do hereby certify that I am the Chief Financial Officer of World Omni Financial Corp., a Florida corporation, and further certifyon behalf of World Omni Financial Corp. in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement,dated as of April 11, 2018 (the “Agreement”), among World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2018-B, as Issuing Entity, WorldOmni Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor, and the Servicer, as follows:

 

(i)       Areview of the activities of the Servicer during the period covered by the issuing entity’s Annual Report on form 10-K forthe fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance under the Agreement, has beenmade under my supervision.

 

(ii)       Tothe best of my knowledge, based on the review described above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreementin all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereuntoset my hand as of March 8, 2019.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DURLAND PARRISH.

No. COA03-1638

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 5, 2004.

This case not for publication

Pender County, No. 03 CRS 51882.

*Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Q. Shante' Martin, for the State.*

*Appellate Defender Staples Hughes for defendant-appellant.*

TIMMONS-GOODSON, Judge.

Defendant pled guilty, pursuant to a plea agreement, to first-degree sex offense with a child. In accordance with the terms of the plea agreement, the trial court sentenced defendant to a presumptive term of 192-240 months imprisonment. Defendant appeals.

Counsel appointed to represent defendant has been unable to identify any issue with sufficient merit to support a meaningful argument for relief on appeal, and asks that this Court conduct its own review of the record for possible prejudicial error. Counsel has also shown to the satisfaction of this Court that he has complied with the requirements of *Anders v. California,* 386 U.S.738, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493, *reh'g denied,* 388 U.S. 924, 18 L. Ed. 2d 1377 (1967), and *State v. Kinch,* 314 N.C. 99, 331 S.E.2d 665 (1985), by advising defendant of his right to file written arguments with this Court and providing him with the documents necessary for him to do so.

Defendant has not filed any written arguments on his own behalf with this Court, and a reasonable time in which he could have done so has passed. In accordance with *Anders,* we have fully examined the record to determine whether any issues of arguable merit appear therefrom or whether the appeal is wholly frivolous. We conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Furthermore, we have examined the record for possible prejudicial error and have found none.

No error.

Judges CALABRIA and LEVINSON concur.

Report per Rule 30(e).
Paul MALONE, Petitioner v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

No. 19-6346

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.