alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jane DOE 1, Individually and as Guardian ad Litem for John Doe 1, Minor Child, Jane Doe 2, Individually and as Guardian ad Litem for John Doe 2, Minor Child, and John and Jane Doe 3, Individually and as Guardian ad Litem for John Doe 3, Minor Child, v. SWANNANOA VALLEY YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER, a North Carolina State Agency, North Carolina Department of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, a North Carolina State Agency, Brian Harkins, Phil Lytle, Lani Lancaster, Ken Arontin, T. Cordell, J.B. Simmons, and Michael Sweitzer, Individually and as Public Employees.

No. 158P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 15, 2004.

Robert Hargett, Special Deputy Attorney General, Donna B. Wojcik, Assistant Attorney General, for Swannanoa Valley and N.C. DJJDP.

Nancy P. White, Raleigh, Lynne M. Holtkamp, Durham, for Jane Doe 1, et al.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 592 S.E.2d 715.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 2nd day of April 2004 by Defendants (Swannanoa Valley Youth Development Center and N.C. Department of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th day of April 2004."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendants (Swannanoa Valley Youth Development Center and N.C. Department of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention) on the 12th day of April 2004 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th day of April 2004."
# Official Journal C 114/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 114 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6510 March 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 114

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6510 March 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 114/01 | Withdrawal of notification of a concentration (Case M.10319 – GREINER / RECTICEL) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 114/01

Withdrawal of notification of a concentration (Case M.10319 – GREINER / RECTICEL) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 114/02 | Euro exchange rates — 9 March 2022 | 2 |
| | NOTICES CONCERNING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA |
| | EFTA Surveillance Authority |
| 2022/C 114/03 | State aid – Decision to raise no objections | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 114/02

Euro exchange rates — 9 March 2022

2

NOTICES CONCERNING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA

EFTA Surveillance Authority

2022/C 114/03

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office |
| 2022/C 114/04 | Notice of Open Competition | 5 |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | EFTA Court |
| 2022/C 114/05 | Action brought on 28 January 2022 by the EFTA Surveillance Authority against Iceland (Case E-3/22) | 6 |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 114/06 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10665 – WAVERLY / TPG / ASIA HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 8 |
| 2022/C 114/07 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10632 – WATERLAND / DUVENBECK) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 10 |

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office

2022/C 114/04

Notice of Open Competition

5

COURT PROCEEDINGS

EFTA Court

2022/C 114/05

Action brought on 28 January 2022 by the EFTA Surveillance Authority against Iceland (Case E-3/22)

6

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2022/C 114/06

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10665 – WAVERLY / TPG / ASIA HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

8

2022/C 114/07

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10632 – WATERLAND / DUVENBECK) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

10

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Rodney A. BASS and wife, Sherri Faucette Bass v. PINNACLE CUSTOM HOMES.

No. 162P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 10, 2004.

Robert B. Jervis, for Bass.

Robert B. Chambers, for Pinnacle Custom Homes.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th day of April 2004 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th day of May 2004."
Willie Joe WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. Stephen WELCH, et al.

No. 18-9348

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 07, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **5**
**- 7969** 

WILLIE BRANCH, a/k/a Willie Branch

- El ,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
OFFICER T. CARRILLO; LT. R. WRIGHT, SHU Lieutenant; OFFICER J. DAVIS, SHU Property Officer; KATHRYN JACKSON, Counselor; BONNIE HERNANDEZ, Case Manager ,
Defendan t s
- Appellee s
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 5:1 5

- ct

- 03170

- BO )

Submitted : May 31, 2016 Decided: June 7, 2016

Before DUNCAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirm ed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Willie Branch, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding preceden t in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Willie Branch appeals the district court’s order dismissing
under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) his complaint filed pursuant

to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials be fore this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Independent Auditors' Consent



To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
Smith Barney Muni Funds
   Massachusetts Money Market Portfolio:

We consent to the use of the reference to our Firm under the
heading "Auditors" in the Statement of Additional Information.

				KPMG LLP


New York, New York
September 8, 1999
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350




In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Effective
Profitable Software, Inc. for the period  ending March 31, 2008, I, Donald
Bratcher, Chief Financial Officer of Effective Profitable Software, Inc. hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
that:




1.
            Such
      Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2008,
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
            The
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
      the period ended March 31, 2008, fairly represents in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Effective
      Profitable Software, Inc.




Date:
      May 14, 2008By:/s/ Donald
      BratcherDonald
      Bratcher
              Chief
      Financial Officer
[ARTICLE] 6
[CIK] 0000880583
[NAME] STRATEGIC STOCK PORTFOLIO
[SERIES]
   [NUMBER] 16
   [NAME] THE TRAVELERS SERIES TRUST
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   YEAR
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1999
[PERIOD-END]                               DEC-31-1999
[INVESTMENTS-AT-COST]                       15,611,938
[INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE]                      14,812,652
[RECEIVABLES]                                   35,123
[ASSETS-OTHER]                                     445
[OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS]                                 0
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                              14,848,220
[PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES]                             0
[SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT]                              0
[OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES]                      118,440
[TOTAL-LIABILITIES]                            118,440
[SENIOR-EQUITY]                                      0
[PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON]                    14,475,958
[SHARES-COMMON-STOCK]                        1,482,962
[SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR]                          727,932
[ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT]                      259,123
[OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII]                               0
[ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS]                        793,985
[OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS]                             0
[ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC]                     (799,286)
[NET-ASSETS]                                14,729,780
[DIVIDEND-INCOME]                              242,542
[INTEREST-INCOME]                              127,945
[OTHER-INCOME]                                       0
[EXPENSES-NET]                                 111,306
[NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME]                        259,181
[REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT]                       795,590
[APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT]                    (783,945)
[NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS]                          270,826
[EQUALIZATION]                                       0
[DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME]                          118
[DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS]                             0
[DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER]                                0
[NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD]                      1,070,362
[NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED]                    315,343
[SHARES-REINVESTED]                                 11
[NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS]                       7,843,013
[ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR]                             60
[ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR]                      (1,605)
[OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR]                              0
[OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR]                           0
[GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES]                           81,606
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                   0
[GROSS-EXPENSE]                                122,806
[AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS]                        12,386,894
[PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN]                             9.46
[PER-SHARE-NII]                                   0.21
[PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC]                           0.26
[PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND]                              0.00
[PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS]                         0.00
[RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL]                                 0
[PER-SHARE-NAV-END]                               9.93
[EXPENSE-RATIO]                                   0.90
</TABLE>
Independent Auditors' Report



The Board of Directors of
The Italy Fund Inc.:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements of The Italy
Fund Inc. (the "Fund") for the year ended January 31, 2001, we considered its
internal control, including control activities for safeguarding securities, in
order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our
opinion on the financial statements and to comply with the requirements of
Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and maintaining
internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments
by management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs
of controls.  Generally, controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the
entity's objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. Those controls include the
safeguarding of assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, error or fraud may occur
and not be detected.  Also, projection of any evaluation of internal control
to future periods is subject to the risk that it may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily disclose all
matters in internal control that might be material weaknesses under standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A
material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of one or
more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low
level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in amounts that
would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited may
occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal
course of performing their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters
involving internal control and its operation, including controls for
safeguarding securities, that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined
above as of January 31, 2001.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of management, the
Board of Directors of the Fund, and the Securities and Exchange Commission and
is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these
specified parties.


March 8, 2001
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EC22-61-000]

                    On June 9, 2022, LSP-Whitewater Limited Partnership; Wisconsin Public Service Corporation; and Wisconsin Electric Power Company (Applicants) filed a request for an extension of time to respond to the deficiency letter issued in this docket issued on May 19, 2022.[1]                                          Applicants request an extension so that they may develop a horizontal market power analysis that may include a Delivered Price Test.                

Upon consideration, notice is hereby given that Applicant's request is granted, extending the deadline to respond an additional 30 days until July 18, 2022.

Dated: June 10, 2022.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Deputy Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                                                     *LSP-Whitewater Limited Partnership,*                         Docket No. EC22-61-000 (May 19, 2022) (deficiency letter).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2022-12990 Filed 6-15-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
HP INC., fka Hewlett-Packard Company, Petitioner, v. Steven E. BERKHEIMER.

No. 18-415

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the amended quarterly report of STAT Software, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the three months ended
June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas P. Condie, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Richard B. Vincent, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Douglas P. Condie

Douglas P. Condie

Chief Executive Officer

May 2, 2005





/s/ Richard B. Vincent

Richard B. Vincent

Chief Financial Officer

May 2, 2005
Mark ROBERTSON, Petitioner v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

No. 19-6181

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
----

Action brought on 9 June 2004 by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-215/04)

(2004/C 217/51)

Language of the case: English

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 9 June 2004 by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, represented by M. Bethell, agent, assisted by D. Anderson QC and H. Davies, Barrister, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The applicant contests the Commission decision of 30 March 2004 on the aid scheme which the United Kingdom is planning to implement with regard to the Government of Gibraltar Corporation Tax Reform (1). In the decision, the Commission finds that the proposed tax reform constitutes state aid incompatible with the common market.

In support of its application, the applicant submits that the Commission's conclusions as to regional selectivity are vitiated by material errors of fact and are wrong in law.

According to the applicant, Gibraltar, which is a colony whose self-government the United Kingdom is obliged to develop under the UN Charter, does not form part of the United Kingdom as a matter of domestic, international and Community law. Furthermore, the applicant states that Gibraltar is distinct from the United Kingdom and that it receives no subsidy or financing from the United Kingdom. The applicant also claims that the tax systems of the United Kingdom and of Gibraltar are entirely separate and unconnected and that the reform proposals do not constitute a tax reduction to the tax system applicable in the United Kingdom. The Commission's approach also infringes, according to the applicant, the principle of equal treatment in that measures adopted by a symmetrically devolved region are not to be treated as state aid whereas the same measures adopted by a asymmetrically devolved region are.

The applicant contends that the Commission's conclusions with respect to material selectivity are wrong in law and are insufficiently reasoned.

The applicant finally submits that the Commission has infringed the applicant's right to be heard in that it did not raise certain matters upon which it has sought to base its decision during the course of the procedure under Article 88(2) EC.

----

(1)  State aid C 66/2002 — Gibraltar government corporation tax reform.

----
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK>
<NAME> Van Kempen Enterprise Portfolio
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER>      003
   <NAME>Travelers Series Fund Inc.

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  Oct-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                       Oct-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>              260,183,950
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>             324,580,184
<RECEIVABLES>                       13,254,048
<ASSETS-OTHER>                          60,403
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     337,894,635
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>             6,771,083
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                      0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>              530,305
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                  7,301,388
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                              0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>           213,109,423
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>               12,914,106
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>               12,279,654
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                    0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                       0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>             53,087,590
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                     0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>            64,396,234
<NET-ASSETS>                       330,593,247
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                    1,460,899
<INTEREST-INCOME>                      367,700
<OTHER-INCOME>                               0
<EXPENSES-NET>                       2,633,002
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>               (804,403)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>            53,338,578
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>           (7,657,420)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>               44,876,755
<EQUALIZATION>                               0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>               15,787
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>            44,056,608
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                        0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                457,422
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>          1,425,020
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                  1,602,050
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>              17,183,741
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                 15,787
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>           43,805,856
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                      0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                   0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                2,542,509
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                      2,633,002
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>               361,548,509
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                   25.520
<PER-SHARE-NII>                         (0.060)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                  3.870
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                     0.000
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                3.730
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                     0.000
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                     25.600
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                           0.72



</TABLE>