alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE of North Carolina v. Cleveland Sylvester HARRIS.

No. 241P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 24, 2004.

Cleveland S. Harris, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 18th day of May 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Wake County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 24th day of May 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Wake County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."
## RECEIVED IN COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSNa PD" • MAR 18 2015 in the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS 

### AbelAcosta, Clerk RICHARD CRUZ

THE STATE OF TEXAS RECEIVED 

### Court of Appeals



## MAR 1 2 2015

Lisa Matz 

### Clerk, 5th District
APPELLANT

APPELLEE MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARYREVIEW TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT: Now comes Richard Cruz, Appellant in the above styled and numbered cause, and pursuant to 

### Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure68.2(c),movesfor an extensionof time of 30 days to file a petition for discretionary review, and for good cause shows the following: 

### 1. Followingremandfromthis Court,the FifthDistrictCourtof Appeals on February9,2015, affirmed appellant's conviction in its opinion and judgment in Richard Cruz v. The State ofTexas, Case No. 05-14-00144-CR, (Tex.App.—Dallas, decided February 9, 2015); no motion for rehearing was filed and the petition for discretionary review is therefore due on March 11, 2015. 2. Appellant requests an additional thirty (30) days from the deadline stated above and 

### FILED IN Appellant asks this Court to order thepetition to be due on orbefore April tPOQW^eOlRl^iR^ML^F^PP^1 

### Discretionary Review. MAR 20 2£iJ 3. No previous extensions have been requested. Abel Acosta, Cier»v 4. The facts relied upon to reasonably explain the need for an extension oftime are as follows: 

### Appellant is considering to file a petition fordiscretionary review (PDR). Appellant is currently seeking legal counsel and may not have sufficienttime to preparethe PDR.

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PETITIONFOR DISCRETIONARYREVffiW, Page 1

### WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellantrespectfullyrequests an extension of30 days, i.e. until April 10, 2015, to file a petition for discretionary review. Respectfully submitted,

Richard Cruz // 3534 Bolivar Dr. Dallas, Texas 75220 

### Telephone: (214) 754-9482 APPELLANT

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

## This is to certify that on March jH[, 2015, atrue and correct copy ofthe above and foregoing document was served upon the State ofTexas by U.S. Mail addressed to the Hon. Susan Hawk, Criminal District Attorney, Attn: Appellant Counsel, 133 N. Riverfront Blvd., Dallas, Texas 75207. 

# §\.^(/JhdU\£ Ca^u Richard Cruz



### MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FDLE PETITIONFOR DISCRETIONARYREVDZW, Page 2
STATE of North Carolina v. Irving Larry HAYLOCK.

No. 204P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 12, 2004.

James N. Freeman, Jr., for Irving Larry Haylock.

Richard G. Sowerby, Assistant Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 5th day of May 2004 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th day of August 2004."
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 120 (Thursday, June 23, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 37521]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13422]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIDDK Clinical Centers.
    Date: July 15, 2022.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health/NIDDK, 2 Democracy, 6707 
Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Elena Sanovich, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, 
Room 7351, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-2542, 301-
594-8886, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a8dbc9c6c7dec1cbc0cde8c5c9c1c486c6c1c086cfc7de"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4231232c2d342b212a27022f232b2e6c2c2b2a6c252d34">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-13422 Filed 6-22-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Official Journal C 61/17 F

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 61 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6617 February 2023 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 61

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6617 February 2023

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2023/C 61/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2023/C 61/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections | 11 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2023/C 61/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2023/C 61/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections

11

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Henry Cyrus LUCAS, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 19-6273

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District denied.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Modena 2 Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending April 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christopher
Penner, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Christopher Penner
--------------------------
Christopher Penner
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer

June 14, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Paladin Realty Income Properties, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certifies, to his knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    James R. WormsJames R. Worms President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive
Officer)


August 14, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1093 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1093

To direct the Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation 
Security Administration) to prohibit airplane passengers from bringing 
aboard a passenger aircraft any item that was prohibited as of March 1, 
                                 2013.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 12, 2013

Mr. Markey (for himself, Mr. Grimm, Mr. Tonko, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Lynch, 
 and Mr. Nadler) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation 
Security Administration) to prohibit airplane passengers from bringing 
aboard a passenger aircraft any item that was prohibited as of March 1, 
                                 2013.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Knives Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO PROHIBIT ITEMS ON PASSENGER AIRPLANES.

    The Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation 
Security Administration) shall prohibit carriage aboard a passenger 
aircraft operated by an air carrier or foreign air carrier in air 
transportation or intrastate air transportation of any item that was 
prohibited from being carried aboard such an aircraft on March 1, 2013.
                                 <all>
```
STATE v. STUART

No. COA04-180

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed October 19, 2004

Certification Date November 8, 2004

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE of North Carolina v. Phillip BOSTIC.

No. 144P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 24, 2004.

Phillip Bostic, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Kristy M. Newton, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 22nd day of March 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 22nd day of March 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> 
*561
"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."
SMITH BARNEY SECTORS SERIES
on behalf of
Smith Barney Financial Services Fund
Smith Barney Health Sciences Fund
Smith Barney Technology Fund

Supplement dated March 30, 2001 to the
Prospectus Dated February 28, 2001



	On or about April 1, 2001, Citibank, N.A., the fund's
investment sub-adviser, expects to transfer its asset management
business, including investment management of each fund, to its
newly formed affiliate, Citi Fund Management Inc.  The fund
anticipates that the current Citibank personnel will continue to
subadvise each fund's portfolio through Citi Fund Management Inc.
Citi Fund Management Inc. is located at 100 Stamford Place,
Stamford, Connecticut. The manager, the sub-adviser and Citibank
are subsidiaries of Citigroup Inc.



FD02272
John MALLOY, d/b/a the Dogwood Gun Club v. Roy A. COOPER, III, Attorney General for the State of North Carolina; David R. Waters, District Attorney For the 9th Prosecutorial District; David S. Smith, Sheriff of Granville County; State of North Carolina.

No. 595P01-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 6, 2004.

John J. Aldridge, III, Special Deputy Attorney General, for Cooper, Waters & State.

Roger W. Smith, Raleigh, for Malloy.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Attorney General on the 5th day of March 2004 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Plaintiff, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of May 2004."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 5th day of March 2004 by Attorney General in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of May 2004."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Attorney General on the 5th day of March 2004 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of May 2004."
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1284 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for coverage under the 

beneficiary travel program of the Department of Veterans Affairs of 

certain disabled veterans for travel for certain special disabilities rehabilitation, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 20, 2013 

Ms. BROWNLEY of California (for herself and Mr. MICHAUD) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for coverage under the beneficiary travel program of the Department of Veterans Affairs of certain disabled veterans 

for travel for certain special disabilities rehabilitation, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1284 IH

1 SECTION 1. COVERAGE UNDER DEPARTMENT OF VET2 ERANS AFFAIRS BENEFICIARY TRAVEL PRO3 GRAM OF CERTAIN DISABLED VETERANS FOR 

4 TRAVEL FOR CERTAIN SPECIAL DISABILITIES 

5 REHABILITATION. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 111(b)(1) of title 38, 

7 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 

8 following new subparagraph: 

9 ‘‘(G) A veteran with vision impairment, a vet10 eran with a spinal cord injury or disorder, or a vet11 eran with double or multiple amputations whose 

12 travel is in connection with care provided through a 

13 special disabilities rehabilitation program of the De14 partment (including spinal cord injury center pro15 grams, blind rehabilitation center programs, and 

16 prosthetics rehabilitation center programs) if such 

17 care is provided— 

18 ‘‘(i) on an in-patient basis; or 

19 ‘‘(ii) during a period in which the Sec20 retary provides the veteran with temporary 

21 lodging at a facility of the Department to make 

22 such care more accessible to the veteran.’’. 

23 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

24 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans 

25 Affairs shall submit to the Committees on Veterans’ Af26 fairs of the House of Representatives and the Senate a 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1284 IH

1 report on the beneficiary travel program under section 111 

2 of title 38, United States Code, including— 

3 (1) the cost of the program; 

4 (2) the number of veterans served by the pro5 gram; and 

6 (3) any other matters the Secretary considers 

7 appropriate. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
STATE of North Carolina v. Derrick Jovan McRAE.

No. 205P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 24, 2004.

Anne M. Gomez, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Derrick Jovan McRae.

Diane A. Reeves, Assistant Attorney General, Kenneth W. Honeycutt, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 6th day of May 2004 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th day of May 2004 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."
# Official Journal L 348/2013

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.348.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 348 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5620 December 2013 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.348.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 348

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5620 December 2013

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network and repealing Decision No 661/2010/EU (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | * | Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 establishing the Connecting Europe Facility, amending Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 and repealing Regulations (EC) No 680/2007 and (EC) No 67/2010 (
  1
  ) | 129 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network and repealing Decision No 661/2010/EU (
  1
  )

1

1

*

Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 establishing the Connecting Europe Facility, amending Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 and repealing Regulations (EC) No 680/2007 and (EC) No 67/2010 (
  1
  )

1

129

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Alexander FAULKNER, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7115

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1378 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1378

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the United States Federal Judicial Center located at 333 
 West Broadway in San Diego, California, as the ``John Rhoades Federal 
Judicial Center'' and to designate the United States courthouse located 
at 333 West Broadway in San Diego, California, as the ``James M. Carter 
             and Judith N. Keep United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JUDICIAL CENTER DESIGNATION.

    The United States Federal Judicial Center located at 333 West 
Broadway in San Diego, California, shall be known and designated as the 
``John Rhoades Federal Judicial Center''. The Judicial Center includes 
the Federal property located at 221 West Broadway, 333 West Broadway, 
880 Front Street, 325 West F Street, 808 Union Street, and the 
adjoining plaza.

SEC. 2. COURTHOUSE BUILDING DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 333 West Broadway in San 
Diego, California, shall be known and designated as the ``James M. 
Carter and Judith N. Keep United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 3. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States Federal Judicial 
Center referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to 
the ``John Rhoades Federal Judicial Center''. Any reference in a law, 
map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States 
to the United States courthouse referred to in section 2 shall be 
deemed to be a reference to the ``James M. Carter and Judith N. Keep 
United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 9, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1378

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the United States Federal Judicial Center located at 333 
 West Broadway in San Diego, California, as the ``John Rhoades Federal 
Judicial Center'' and to designate the United States courthouse located 
at 333 West Broadway in San Diego, California, as the ``James M. Carter 
             and Judith N. Keep United States Courthouse''.
```