alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1389 

To amend title 10, United States Code, regarding restrictions on abortions 

at medical facilities of the Department of Defense. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 21, 2013 

Ms. SLAUGHTER (for herself, Mr. RANGEL, Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of 

New York, Ms. NORTON, Ms. MOORE, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. DEGETTE, Mr. CAPUANO, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Ms. EDWARDS, 

Ms. PINGREE of Maine, Ms. LOFGREN, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. CONYERS, 

Ms. CASTOR of Florida, Mr. MCNERNEY, Mr. QUIGLEY, Mr. JOHNSON

of Georgia, Mr. CLAY, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. HONDA, Ms. SPEIER, Ms. 

SCHAKOWSKY, Ms. TSONGAS, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. HIGGINS, Mr. 

HOLT, Mr. ELLISON, Ms. CHU, Mrs. DAVIS of California, Mrs. CAPPS, 

and Ms. MATSUI) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, regarding restrictions 

on abortions at medical facilities of the Department of 

Defense. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Military Access to Re5 productive Care and Health for Military Women Act’’ or 

6 the ‘‘MARCH for Military Women Act’’. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1389 IH

1 SEC. 2. RESTORATION OF PREVIOUS POLICY REGARDING 

2 RESTRICTIONS ON USE OF DEPARTMENT OF 

3 DEFENSE MEDICAL FACILITIES. 

4 Section 1093 of title 10, United States Code, is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) by striking subsection (b); and 

7 (2) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘(a) RESTRIC8 TION ON USE OF FUNDS.—’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# Official Journal L 85/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 85 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5828 March 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 85

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5828 March 2015

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/504 of 11 March 2015 implementing Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the administrative requirements for the approval and market surveillance of agricultural and forestry vehicles (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/504 of 11 March 2015 implementing Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the administrative requirements for the approval and market surveillance of agricultural and forestry vehicles (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# C_2017023EN.01000201.xml

| 24.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 23/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 23/2

---

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1))

1

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 23/02)

Decisions granting an authorisation

Decisions granting an authorisation

| Reference of the decision (2) | Date of decision | Substance name | Holder of the authorisation | Authorisation number | Authorised use | Date of expiry of review period | Reasons for the decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C(2017) 69 | 17 January 2017 | Trichloroethylene
  EC No 201-167-4
  CAS No 79-01-6 | DOMO Caproleuna GmbH, Bau 3421, Am Haupttor, 06237 Leuna, Germany | REACH/16/8/0 | Use as extraction solvent for the purification of caprolactam from the caprolactam oil | 21 April 2023 | In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socioeconomic benefits outweigh the risk to human health arising from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies in terms of their technical and economic feasibility. |

Reference of the decision (2)

2

Date of decision

Substance name

Holder of the authorisation

Authorisation number

Authorised use

Date of expiry of review period

Reasons for the decision

C(2017) 69

17 January 2017

Trichloroethylene

EC No 201-167-4

CAS No 79-01-6

DOMO Caproleuna GmbH, Bau 3421, Am Haupttor, 06237 Leuna, Germany

REACH/16/8/0

Use as extraction solvent for the purification of caprolactam from the caprolactam oil

21 April 2023

In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socioeconomic benefits outweigh the risk to human health arising from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies in terms of their technical and economic feasibility.

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

1

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/chemicals/reach/about/index_en.htm

2

---
Victor LOPEZ, Petitioner v. STERLING CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et al.

No. 19-6299

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
IN RE Arturo Rodriguez ORNALEZ, Petitioner

No. 19-6659

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of prohibition denied.
Independent Auditors' Report


To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Smith Barney Investment Funds Inc.:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements
of the Smith Barney Group Spectrum Fund of the Smith Barney
Investment Funds Inc. (the Fund) for the year ended September 30,
2001, we considered its internal control, including control
activities for safeguarding securities, in order to determine our
auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on
the financial statements and to comply with the requirements of
Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on the internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles. Those controls include the safeguarding of
assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or
fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any
evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to
the risk that it may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in the internal control that might be
material weaknesses under standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness
is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of
the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively
low level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in
amounts that would be material in relation to the financial
statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a
timely period by employees in the normal course of performing
their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters involving
the internal control and its operation, including controls for
safeguarding securities that we consider to be material
weaknesses as defined above.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management, the Board of Directors of the Fund, and the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not intended to be and
should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.



New York, New York
November 13, 2001
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>







To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Smith Barney Investment Funds Inc.:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements
of the Smith Barney Managed Growth Fund of Smith Barney
Investment Funds Inc. (the "Fund") for the year ended December
31, 1997, we considered its internal control, including control
activities for safeguarding securities, in order to determine our
auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on
the financial statements and to comply with the requirements of
Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on the internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles. Those controls include the safeguarding of
assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or
irregularities may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection
of any evaluation of internal control to future periods is
subject to the risk that it may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and
operation may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in the internal control that might be
material weaknesses under standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness
is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of
the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively
low level the risk that errors or irregularities in amounts that
would be material in relation to the financial statements being
audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by
employees in the normal course of performing their assigned
functions.  However, we noted no matters involving the internal
control and its operation, including controls for safeguarding
securities that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined
above.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management, the Board of Directors of the Fund, and the
Securities and Exchange Commission.




February 10, 1998


</TABLE>
Robin BRINDLE, et al., Petitioners, v. DELTA AIRLINES, INC., et al.

No. 19-352

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Rhode Island denied.
RESORT REALTY OF THE OUTER BANKS, INC. T/A Resort Realty v. Volker BRANDT and Wife, Eva Brandt.

No. 128P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 1, 2004.

Volker Brandt, Pro Se.

Eva Brandt, Pro Se.

E. Crouse Gray, Jr., Kill Devil Hills, for Resort Realty.

Prior report: __ N.C.App. ___, 593 S.E.2d 404.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendants on the 19th day of March 2004 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

> "Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of April 2004."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 19th day of March 2004 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of April 2004."
Danea M. ADDISON, Petitioner v. INDIANA, dba Family and Social Services Administration

No. 18-9439

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

The petition for rehearing is denied.
SMITH BARNEY CONCERT ALLOCATION SERIES INC.

ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT

	SMITH BARNEY CONCERT ALLOCATION SERIES INC. a Maryland
corporation, having its principal office in Baltimore City,
Maryland (hereinafter called the "Corporation"), hereby certifies
to the State Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland
that:

	FIRST: Article II of the Articles of Incorporation of the
Corporation is hereby further amended to read as follows:

Article II
NAME

	The name of the Corporation is "SMITH BARNEY ALLOCATION
SERIES INC." (the "Corporation")

	SECOND:  The foregoing amendment to the Articles of
Incorporation of the Corporation has been approved by a majority of
the entire Board of Directors of the Corporation and is limited to
a change expressly permitted by Section 2-605 of the Maryland
General Corporation Law to be made without action of the
stockholders.

	THE UNDERSIGNED, the Senior Vice President of Smith Barney
Concert Allocation Series Inc. acknowledges these Articles of
Amendment to be the corporate act of the Corporation and hereby
certifies to the best of his knowledge, information and belief that
the matters and facts set forth in these Articles of Amendment with
respect to the authorization and approval of the amendment to the
Corporation's Articles of Incorporation are true in all material
respects under the penalties of perjury.

	IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SMITH BARNEY CONCERT ALLOCATION SERIES
INC. has caused these Articles of Amendment to be executed and
acknowledged in its name and on its behalf by its Senior Vice
President and witnessed by its Assistant Secretary on this 13th day
of September, 2000.



					SMITH BARNEY CONCERT ALLOCATION
SERIES INC.


					By:

					      Lewis E. Daidone
					      Senior Vice President


WITNESS:

_____________________________
Barbara J. Allen
Assistant Secretary






G:\Fund Accounting\Legal\FUNDS\SBCS\ORGDOCS\amdarticlesnamechange.doc
Barry Lernard DAVIS, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6600

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 16, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Mauricio AGUIRRE, aka Mauricio Aguirre-Orcutt, aka Peter Holston-Aguirre, aka Peter Holston, aka Miller Aguirre, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6876

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 21, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Donna W. WOOD, Administratrix of the Estate of Timothy Joe Wood, Deceased v. Monique Nicole WELDON and Unnamed Defendants.

No. 614P03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 24, 2004.

Bryan T. Simpson, Tracy L. Jones, Raleigh, for Interstate Insurance Company/Harbor Specialty Insurance Company.

C. Murphy Archibald, Jenny L. Sharpe, Charlotte, for Wood.

***AMENDED ORDER***

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 5th day of December 2003 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review as to additional issues of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."
Frances Du JU, Petitioner v. WASHINGTON, et al.;

No. 19-5090

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
Gerald NELSON, Petitioner v. AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION LOCAL 1181-1061, AFL-CIO, et al.

No. 19-6074

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for rehearing denied.
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1157 

AN ACT 

To ensure public access to the summit of Rattlesnake Mountain in the Hanford Reach National Monument for educational, recreational, historical, scientific, cultural, and 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1157 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rattlesnake Mountain 

3 Public Access Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

5 Congress finds the following: 

6 (1) The Hanford Reach National Monument is 

7 public land that belongs to the American people. 

8 (2) The United States Fish and Wildlife Serv9 ice’s Comprehensive Conservation Plan (CCP) for 

10 the Monument restricts public access to large por11 tions of the Monument, including the summit of 

12 Rattlesnake Mountain. 

13 (3) Public access to Rattlesnake Mountain is 

14 important for educational, recreational, historical, 

15 scientific, and cultural purposes. 

16 (4) Rattlesnake Mountain reaches an elevation 

17 of 3,660 feet above sea level—the highest elevation 

18 of the Monument, and provides unparalleled scenic 

19 views over the Monument, the Hanford Site, and the 

20 Columbia River. 

21 (5) Public access to Rattlesnake Mountain will 

22 increase tourism interest in the Monument and will 

23 provide economic benefits to local governments. 
3 

•HR 1157 EH

1 SEC. 3. ENSURING PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE SUMMIT OF 

2 RATTLESNAKE MOUNTAIN IN THE HANFORD 

3 REACH NATIONAL MONUMENT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior shall 

5 provide public access to the summit of Rattlesnake Moun6 tain in the Hanford Reach National Monument for edu7 cational, recreational, historical, scientific, cultural, and 

8 other purposes, including— 

9 (1) motor vehicle access; and 

10 (2) pedestrian and other nonmotorized access. 

11 (b) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.—The Secretary of 

12 the Interior may enter into cooperative agreements to fa13 cilitate access to the summit of Rattlesnake Mountain— 

14 (1) with the Secretary of Energy, the State of 

15 Washington, or any local government agency or 

16 other interested persons, for guided tours, including 

17 guided motorized tours to the summit of Rattlesnake 

18 Mountain; and 

19 (2) with the Secretary of Energy, and with the 

20 State of Washington or any local government agency 
4 

•HR 1157 EH

1 or other interested persons, to maintain the access 

2 road to the summit of Rattlesnake Mountain. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 11, 2013. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1157 

AN ACT 

To ensure public access to the summit of Rattleical, scientific, cultural, and other purposes. Monument for educational, recreational, histor- snake Mountain in the Hanford Reach National
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
the Smith Barney Institutional Cash Management Fund, Inc.:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements 
of Government Portfolio of the Smith Barney Institutional Cash 
Management Fund, Inc. (the "Fund") for the year ended 
May 31, 1998, we considered its internal control, including 
control activities for safeguarding securities, in order to 
determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing 
our opinion on the financial statements and to comply with the 
requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on the 
internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and 
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility, 
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the 
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally, 
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's 
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes 
that are fairly presented in conformity with generally accepted 
accounting principles. Those controls include the safeguarding of 
assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition. 

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or 
irregularities may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection 
of any evaluation of internal control to future periods is 
subject to the risk that it may become inadequate because of 
changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and 
operation may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily 
disclose all matters in the internal control that might be 
material weaknesses under standards established by the American 
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness 
is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of 
the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively 
low level the risk that errors or irregularities in amounts that 
would be material in relation to the financial statements being 
audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by 
employees in the normal course of performing their assigned 
functions.  However, we noted no matters involving the internal 
control and its operation, including controls for safeguarding 
securities that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined 
above. 

This report is intended solely for the information and use of 
management, the Board of Directors of the Fund, and the 
Securities and Exchange Commission.



July 15, 1998
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.18    
    


 
 

CHEROKEE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION    
    


FEBRUARY 2004 STOCK PLAN  



        1.    Establishment.    There is hereby adopted the February 2004 Stock Plan (hereinafter called the "Plan") of
Cherokee International Corporation (the "Corporation"). 


        2.    Stock Subject to the Plan.    The total number of shares of common stock, par value $0.001 ("Common Stock"),
reserved and available for issuance under the Plan shall be 12,825 shares. Such shares of Common Stock may consist, in whole or in part, of authorized and unissued shares or treasury shares. 



        3.    Administration of the Plan.    The Plan shall be administered by the Board of Directors of the Corporation (the
"Board"). The Board may from time to time determine which eligible employees shall be granted awards of Common Stock ("Stock Awards") under the Plan; the number of shares for which such awards shall
be granted; and all other terms and conditions of such awards to be granted. The Board shall have the sole authority, in its absolute discretion, to adopt, amend, and rescind such rules and
regulations as, in its opinion, may be advisable in the administration of the Plan, to construe and interpret the Plan, the rules and regulations, and to make all other determinations deemed necessary
or advisable for the administration of the Plan. All decisions, determinations and interpretations of the Board shall be final and binding on all grantees of Common Stock under the Plan and on other
interested parties. 


        4.    Eligibility.    Persons eligible for Stock Awards under the Plan are those employees of the Corporation or its
subsidiaries designated from time to time by the Board. 


        5.    Stock Awards.    As consideration for past services, the Board may grant shares of Common Stock to eligible
recipients as set forth in Section 4 hereof. 


        6.    Amendment, Suspension or Termination of the Plan.    The Board may at any time suspend or terminate this Plan,
and may amend it from time to time in such respects as it may deem advisable. 









QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.18


CHEROKEE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION