alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“W hen denying relief, the court m ay hand down an opinion but is 1

not required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and m em orandum opinions).

NUMBER 13-10-00156-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

IN RE LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY WORKFORCE

DEVELOPMENT BOARD, INC. D/B/A WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS, INC.

____________________________________________________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1

Relator, Lower Rio Grande Valley Workforce Development Board, Inc. d/b/a

Workforce Solutions, filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for temporary

emergency relief in the above cause on April 6, 2010. That same day, the Court ordered

the real parties in interest to file responses to relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and

the motion for temporary emergency relief. On April 13, 2010, the Court granted the

motion for temporary emergency relief and ordered the temporary restraining order issued
2

on March 19, 2010, and extended by further order issued on April 1, 2010, to be stayed.

Currently pending before the Court is relator’s “Motion for Voluntary Dismissal” of

this original proceeding. According to this motion, the real parties in interest have

nonsuited their claims against relator and accordingly, “this mandamus action is effectively

moot.”

The Court, having examined and fully considered the motion for voluntary dismissal,

is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Accordingly, the stay previously

imposed by this Court is LIFTED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b) (“Unless vacated or

modified, an order granting temporary relief is effective until the case is finally decided.”).

This original proceeding is DISMISSED as moot. Pending motions, if any, are likewise

DISMISSED as moot. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

3rd day of May, 2010.
Juan Carlos RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9434

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Lance PATTERSON, Petitioner v. INDIANA FAMILY AND SOCIAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

No. 19-181

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 16, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Indiana denied.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1413 

To authorize appropriations for the SelectUSA Initiative, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 9, 2013 

Mr. RUIZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To authorize appropriations for the SelectUSA Initiative, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘SelectUSA Authoriza5 tion Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SELECTUSA INITIATIVE DEFINED. 

7 In this Act, the term ‘‘SelectUSA Initiative’’ means 

8 the SelectUSA Initiative established by Executive Order 

9 13577 of June 15, 2011. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 1413 IH

1 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE 

2 SELECTUSA INITIATIVE. 

3 There is authorized to be appropriated for the 

4 SelectUSA Initiative $17,000,000 for each of fiscal years 

5 2014 through 2018. 

6 SEC. 4. REPORTS AND NOTIFICATIONS TO CONGRESS. 

7 The Secretary of Commerce shall, not later than De8 cember 31 of 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018, submit 

9 to Congress a report on the activities of the SelectUSA 

10 Initiative during the preceding fiscal year. Each such re11 port shall include the following: 

12 (1) The grantees and projects to which assist13 ance was provided under the SelectUSA Initiative 

14 during the preceding fiscal year, and the amount 

15 and type of assistance provided to each such grantee 

16 and project. 

17 (2) The number of foreign firms that relocated 

18 to the United States during the preceding fiscal year 

19 as a result of the activities of the SelectUSA Initia20 tive. 

21 (3) Any findings that are made by the 

22 SelectUSA Initiative in conducting its activities and 

23 are relevant to promoting the United States as a 

24 destination for the location of manufacturing. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
SMITH BARNEY SECTOR SERIES INC.
on behalf of
Smith Barney Global Biotechnology Fund
Smith Barney Global Media & Telecommunications Fund
Smith Barney Global Technology Fund


Supplement dated March 30, 2001 to the
Prospectus Dated February 28, 2001


	On or about April 1, 2001, Citibank, N.A., the fund's
investment sub-adviser, expects to transfer its asset
management business, including investment management of
each fund, to an affiliate, Citigroup Asset Management Ltd.
Each fund anticipates that the current Citibank personnel
will continue to sub-advise the fund's portfolio through
Citigroup Asset Management.  Citigroup Asset Management is
located at 4th Floor, Cottons Centre, Box 200 Hays Lane,
London SE1 2QT. The manager, the sub-adviser and Citibank
are subsidiaries of Citigroup Inc.



FD02273
Donald J. TRUMP, President of the United States, et al., Petitioners, v. PENNSYLVANIA, et al.

No. 19-454.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Jan. 17, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the *919Third Circuit granted. The cases is consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.
Daniel BARBOSA, et al., Petitioners v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al.

No. 19-517

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunset Financial Resources, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stacy M. Riffe, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Stacy M. Riffe                                 
|Stacy M. Riffe                                     
|Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

August 9, 2006
# Official Journal L 56/2 Ma

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 56 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 592 March 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 56

English edition

Legislation

Volume 592 March 2016

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | | Commission |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/282 of 26 February 2016 amending Regulation (EC) No 748/2009 on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

Commission

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/282 of 26 February 2016 amending Regulation (EC) No 748/2009 on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
STATE of North Carolina v. Destiny Raye THOMPSON.

No. 610P03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 4, 2004.

James N. Freeman, Jr., for Thompson.

*33Marc Bernstein, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th day of November 2003 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of March 2004."
Monica Nicole TOWNSEND, Petitioner v. Erik Allen VASQUEZ

No. 19-5783

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 21, 2020

The petition for rehearing is denied.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

Whitehorn Construction, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 63606

)

Under Contract No. N62473

- 16

- C

- 3324 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT : Edward W. O ’ Connell, Jr., Esq.

Lake Elsinore, CA

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Craig D. Jensen, Esq.

Navy Chief Trial Attorney

Katherine E. Arutunian, Esq.

Trial Attorney

San Diego , CA

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE THRASHER

The parties have resolved their dispute and request that the Board enter judgment

in favor of appellant.

It is the Board ’ s decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. §§ 7105(e), 7108(b) , and the

parties ’ stipulation and agreement, that the appeal is sustained. In the nature of a consent

judgment, the Board makes a monetary award to appellant in the amount of $460,517

. This amount is inclusive of interest. No further interest shall be paid.

Dated: August 30, 2023

JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

(Signatures continued)2 I concur

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD

Administrative Judge

Vice Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals I concur

OWEN C. WILSON

Administrative Judge

Vice Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63606

, Appeal of Whitehorn

Construction, Inc. , rendered in conformance with the Board ’ s Charter.

Dated: August 31, 2023

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
IN RE Antwoyn SPENCER, petitioner.

No. 19-7049

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
The Global Partners Income Fund Inc


               Report of Independent Accountants


To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
The Global Partners Income Fund Inc


In planning and performing our audit of the financial
statements of The Global Partners Income Fund Inc (hereafter
referred to as the Fund) for the year ended August 31, 2001,
we considered its internal control, including control
activities for safeguarding securities, in order to determine
our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our
opinion on the financial statements and to comply with the
requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on
internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this
responsibility, estimates and judgments by management are
required to assess the expected benefits and related costs of
controls.  Generally, controls that are relevant to an audit
pertain to the entity's objective of preparing financial
statements for external purposes that are fairly presented in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
Those controls include the safeguarding of assets against
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or
fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any
evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to
the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes
in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and
operation may deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in internal control that might be material
weaknesses under standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness
is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more
of the internal control components does not reduce to a
relatively low level the risk that misstatements caused by
error or fraud in amounts that would be material in relation to
the financial statements being audited may occur and not be
detected within a timely period by employees in the normal
course of performing their assigned functions.  However, we
noted no matters involving internal control and its operation,
including controls for safeguarding securities, that we
consider to be material weaknesses as defined above as of
August 31, 2001.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management and the Board of Directors of the Fund and the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not intended to be
and should not be used by anyone other than these specified
parties.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

October 23, 2001
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1391 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 587
113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1391

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 18, 2014

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                           November 13, 2014

               Reported by Mr. Carper, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 Designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 25 South Oak Street in London, Ohio, as the ``London Fallen Veterans 
                        Memorial Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LONDON FALLEN VETERANS MEMORIAL POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 25 South Oak Street in London, Ohio, shall be known and 
designated as the ``London Fallen Veterans Memorial Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``London 
Fallen Veterans Memorial Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 587

113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1391

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 Designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 25 South Oak Street in London, Ohio, as the ``London Fallen Veterans 
                        Memorial Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 13, 2014

                       Reported without amendment
```
Felipe VINAGRE-HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5697

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
VIA EDGAR 
 
 
 
March 3, 1997 
 
 
Securities and Exchange Commission 
450 Fifth Street, N.W. 
Washington, D.C. 20549 
 
RE:	Travelers Series Fund Inc. 
	File Nos. 33-75644 
		   811-8372 
 
Dear Sirs: 
 
 
Pursuant to Rule 497(j) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,  
please accept this letter as certification that the Prospectus and Statement 
of  Additional Information for the above-referenced fund (the "Fund") does  
not differ from that contained in Post-Effective Amendment No. 7 to the  
Fund's Registration Statement on Form N-1A, which was filed electronically
on February 25, 1997.     
   
 
Please return an electronic transmittal as evidence of your receipt of this  
filing. 
 
Very truly yours, 
 
/s/ Daria J. Szczur 
 
Daria J. Szczur 
 
Enclosures
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2



                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

         I, Denise Barton, Chief Financial Officer of Atlantic Coast
Entertainment Holdings, Inc. and ACE Gaming, LLC, ( the "Registrants") certify
that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 of the Registrant (the
"Report"):

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
                  (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Registrant.

     /s/     Denise Barton
-------------------------------------
Name:         Denise Barton

Date:    November 18, 2004
      -------------------------------





                                       2
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
The Emerging Markets Income Fund Inc


               Report of Independent Accountants


To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
The Emerging Markets Income Fund Inc


In planning and performing our audit of the financial
statements of The Emerging Markets Income Fund Inc (hereafter
referred to as the Fund) for the year ended August 31, 2001,
we considered its internal control, including control
activities for safeguarding securities, in order to determine
our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our
opinion on the financial statements and to comply with the
requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on
internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this
responsibility, estimates and judgments by management are
required to assess the expected benefits and related costs of
controls.  Generally, controls that are relevant to an audit
pertain to the entity's objective of preparing financial
statements for external purposes that are fairly presented in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
Those controls include the safeguarding of assets against
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or
fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any
evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to
the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes
in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and
operation may deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in internal control that might be material
weaknesses under standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness
is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more
of the internal control components does not reduce to a
relatively low level the risk that misstatements caused by
error or fraud in amounts that would be material in relation to
the financial statements being audited may occur and not be
detected within a timely period by employees in the normal
course of performing their assigned functions.  However, we
noted no matters involving internal control and its operation,
including controls for safeguarding securities, that we
consider to be material weaknesses as defined above as of
August 31, 2001.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management and the Board of Directors of the Fund and the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not intended to be
and should not be used by anyone other than these specified
parties.




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


October 23, 2001
Independent Auditors Consent



To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Managed High Income Portfolio Inc.:

We consent to the use of our report dated April 24, 1998 for the Managed 
High Income Portfolio Inc., incorporated herein by reference and to the 
references to our Firm under the headings Financial Highlights in the 
Prospectus and Independent Public Accountants in the Statement of Additional 
Information.




	KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


New York, New York
June 16, 1998
Kevin LAMPKIN, et al., Petitioners v. UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED, fka UBS PaineWebber, Incorporated, et al.

No. 19-249

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






| |                                                                                                                                                                    
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                                  
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Registrant.



| |     |                  
| | --- | -----------------
| | By: | /s/ Denise Barton

| |                                            
| | -------------------------------------------
| |                                            
| | Denise Barton                              
| | Chief Financial Officer of                 
| | Atlantic Coast Entertainment Holdings, Inc.



26