alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020118EN.01024901.xml

| 8.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/249 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/249

---

P8_TA(2018)0287

EU-New Zealand Agreement relating to the modification of concessions (accession of Croatia) ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 4 July 2018 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and New Zealand pursuant to Article XXIV:6 and Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions in the schedule of the Republic of Croatia in the course of its accession to the European Union (10670/2017 — C8-0121/2018 — 2017/0137(NLE))

(Consent)

(2020/C 118/39)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (10670/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (10670/2017),

| — | having regard to draft Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and New Zealand pursuant to Article XXIV:6 and Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions in the schedule of the Republic of Croatia in the course of its accession to the European Union (10672/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to draft Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and New Zealand pursuant to Article XXIV:6 and Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions in the schedule of the Republic of Croatia in the course of its accession to the European Union (10672/2017),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(4) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0121/2018), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(4) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0121/2018),

| — | having regard to Rule 99(1) and (4), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 99(1) and (4), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A8-0220/2018), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A8-0220/2018),

| 1. | Gives its consent to conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of New Zealand. |
| --- | --- |

2.

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY
RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 CERTIFICATIONS I, Ronald A. Klein, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Origen Financial, Inc.;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared;b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the




---



##### 



audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):  a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. Dated: May 16, 2005
    
    /s/ Ronald A. KleinRonald A. Klein,Chief Executive Officer of Origen Financial, Inc.
|    |                                                                                                                                         |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Arlo Technologies, Inc. (the “Registrant”); and |
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
|   | /s/ MATTHEW MCRAE |
|   | Matthew McRae |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   | Arlo Technologies, Inc. |
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-50727 Summary Calendar

__________________ SHERMAN RENSHAW, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus UNITED STATES PROBATION DEP'T, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-94-CV-145

- - - - - - - - - - April 5, 1996 Before REAVLEY, SMITH and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Sherman Renshaw argues that the district court abused its discretion in failing to conduct an evidentiary hearing on his claim that he is entitled to an immediate federal probation revocation hearing. Renshaw also argues that the district court erred in conducting a de novo review of the record after the United States failed to file timely objections to the magistrate judge's findings and recommendation.No. 95-50727 -2- We have reviewed the record, the opinion of the district court, and the briefs, and find that the dismissal of the petition should be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. See Renshaw v. United States Probation Department , No. A-94-CV-145 (W.D. Tex. Sept. 7, 1995). The district court did not reverse the factual findings or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge. The district court had a duty to fully review the record and was free to accept, reject, or modify the recommendation of the magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district court's ultimate disposition of the case is AFFIRMED.
Andres HERRERA-SEGOVIA, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6094

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Paladin Realty
Income Properties, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certifies, to her knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Whitney A. Greaves               
|Whitney A. Greaves                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)        

August 16, 2010
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
Capital Appreciation Fund:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements
of Capital Appreciation Fund (the "Fund") for the year ended
December 31, 1997, we considered its internal control, including
control activities for safeguarding securities, in order to
determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing
our opinion on the financial statements and to comply with the
requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on the
internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles. Those controls include the safeguarding of
assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or
irregularities may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection
of any evaluation of internal control to future periods is
subject to the risk that it may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and
operation may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in the internal control that might be
material weaknesses under standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness
is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of
the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively
low level the risk that errors or irregularities in amounts that
would be material in relation to the financial statements being
audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by
employees in the normal course of performing their assigned
functions.  However, we noted no matters involving the internal
control and its operation, including controls for safeguarding
securities that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined
above.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management, the Board of Trustees of the Fund, and the Securities
and Exchange Commission.




February 10, 1998
Terry BUCHANAN v. David MITCHELL.

No. 508P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 13, 2004.

Terry Buchanan, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of NC.

David Mitchell, Superintendent Mtn. View Corr. Inst., for Mitchell.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Plaintiff on the 4th day of October 2004 in *468this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Graham County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th day of October 2004."
Independent Auditors' Consent



To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Smith Barney California Municipals Fund Inc.:

We consent to the use of our report dated April 12,
1999, with respect to the Smith Barney California
Municipals Fund Inc., incorporated herein by
reference and to the references to our Firm under
the headings "Financial Highlights" in the
Prospectus and "Auditors" in the Statement of
Additional Information.



	KPMG
LLP


New York, New York
June 23, 1999
STATE of North Carolina v. Sidney EDDIE.

No. 238P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 24, 2004.

Sidney Eddie, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Kenneth W. Honeycutt, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 12th day of May 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."
CLODFELTER v. CLODFELTER

COA03-1256.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 17, 2004.

Certification Date September 7, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed and remanded.
Exhibit 10.1


 


KIBUSH
CAPITAL CORPORATION


 


ACTION
IN WRITING BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS


 


The
undersigned, being all the members of the Board of Directors of KIBUSH CAPITAL CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation (the “Corporation”),
hereby consents to and takes the following actions:


 


RESOLVED,
that John Feeney be and hereby is elected to serve as Chief Import Officer of the Corporation to hold such offices in accordance
with the By-Laws of the Corporation until his successor shall have been duly elected and qualified or until his early death, resignation
or removal in accordance with the By-Laws of the Corporation; and


 


RESOLVED
FURTHER, that the proper officers of the Corporation, or any of them, are hereby authorized and directed to execute all documents
and take all other actions necessary or advisable in order to carry out and perform the purposes of the foregoing resolutions;
and


 


RESOLVED
FURTHER, that the execution by the officers, of any document authorized by the foregoing resolutions or any document executed
in the accomplishment of any action or actions so authorized, is (or shall become upon delivery) the enforceable and binding act
and obligation of the Corporation; and


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this instrument as of the 15th day of July 2019.


 


	 	/s/ Warren Sheppard
	 	Warren Sheppard
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/18/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      385,463
COMMITMENTS
 112,431  125,246  117,105  134,029  111,656  363,565  354,007   21,898   31,456

CHANGES FROM 11/11/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -7,471)
  -4,126   -1,241   -1,976    1,945   -7,595   -4,157  -10,812   -3,314    3,341

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    29.2     32.5     30.4     34.8     29.0     94.3     91.8      5.7      8.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      188)
      46       81       79       42       38      146      154
```

----

Updated November 21, 2014
Brian Alan MATALKA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8056.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit32.1**

**Certification of CEO and CFOPursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Virgin Media Inc. and Virgin MediaInvestment Holdings Limited (the “Registrants”) for the three months ended June30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), Stephen A. Burch, as Chief Executive Officer of theRegistrants, and Jacques Kerrest, as Chief Financial Officer of theRegistrants, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the bestof his knowledge, that:

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrants.
| /s/ Stephen A. Burch |                    |
|----------------------|-------------------------|
| Name:                | Stephen A. Burch        |
| Title:               | Chief Executive Officer |
| Date:                | August 8, 2007          |
|                 |                    |
|                 |                    |
| /s/ Jacques  Kerrest |                    |
| Name:                | Jacques Kerrest         |
| Title:               | Chief Financial Officer |
| Date:                | August 8, 2007          |
|                      |                         |  |  |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 hasbeen provided to the Registrants and will be retained by the Registrants andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certificationaccompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, be deemed filed by the Registrants for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934.

----
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1046 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Disperse Orange 29. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2013 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Disperse Orange 29. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DISPERSE ORANGE 29. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Disperse Orange 29 (CAS 

No. 19800–42–1) (provided for in subheading 

3204.11.50) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2016 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1046 IH

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Anthony D. WHITE, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 19-6763

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District denied.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1212 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that reimbursements 

for costs of using passenger automobiles for charitable and other organizations are excluded from gross income. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 15, 2013 

Mr. PETRI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

that reimbursements for costs of using passenger automobiles for charitable and other organizations are excluded from gross income. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Charitable Driving Tax 

5 Relief Act of 2013’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1212 IH

1 SEC. 2. MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENTS TO CHARITABLE VOL2 UNTEERS EXCLUDED FROM GROSS INCOME. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part III of subchapter B of chap4 ter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended 

5 by inserting after section 139D the following new section: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 139E. MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENTS TO CHARITABLE 

7 VOLUNTEERS. 

8 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Gross income of an individual 

9 does not include amounts received from an organization 

10 described in section 170(c) as reimbursement of operating 

11 expenses with respect to use of a passenger automobile 

12 for the benefit of such organization. The preceding sen13 tence shall apply only to the extent that such reimburse14 ment would be deductible under this chapter if section 

15 274(d) were applied— 

16 ‘‘(1) by using the standard business mileage 

17 rate established under such section, and 

18 ‘‘(2) as if the individual were an employee of an 

19 organization not described in section 170(c). 

20 ‘‘(b) APPLICATION TO VOLUNTEER SERVICES

21 ONLY.—Subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to any 

22 expenses relating to the performance of services for com23 pensation. 

24 ‘‘(c) NO DOUBLE BENEFIT.—Subsection (a) shall 

25 not apply with respect to any expenses if the individual 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1212 IH

1 claims a deduction or credit for such expenses under any 

2 other provision of this title. 

3 ‘‘(d) EXEMPTION FROM REPORTING REQUIRE4 MENTS.—Section 6041 shall not apply with respect to re5 imbursements excluded from income under subsection 

6 (a).’’. 

7 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

8 for part III of subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code 

9 is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 

10 139D the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 139E. Reimbursement for use of passenger automobile for charity.’’. 

11 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

13 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Sean Frederik FRANKE, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 19-5326

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District denied.