alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 2312** 

RUBEN RUTH SOLIS

- SARAVERRIA , Petitioner ,
v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General , Respondent
.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted : December 23, 2013 Decided: January 13, 2014

Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion
.
Ruben Ruth Solis

- Saraverria, Petitioner Pro Se
. Ada Elsie Bosque, Matthew Allan Spurlock , Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Ruben Ruth Solis

- Salaverria , a native and citi zen of El Salvador , petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s order finding him removable and that he was statutorily ineligible for Temporary Protected Status (“TPS”), 8 U.S.C.
§ 1254a (2012) . The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss based on the contention that the petition for review was untimely filed. While we deny the Attorney General’s motion, we also deny the petition for review. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and conclude that the Board properly found that Solis

- Salaverria was not eligible for TPS status because of his two misdemeanor convictions. See 8 U.S.C. § 1254 a (c)(2)(B) (i) . We further conclude that the notice to appear was not defective. S ee Guamanrrigra v. Holder , 670 F.3d 404, 409

- 10 (2d Cir. 2012); Popa v. Holder , 571 F.3d 890, 895

- 96 (9th Cir. 2009)
. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We also deny the Attorney General’s motion to dismiss. We dispense with oral argument be cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
**Exhibit 10.14**

**DESCRIPTION OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES ARRANGEMENT**

**Description of Management Services ArrangementBetween**

**International Textile Group, Inc. and W.L. Ross & Co. LLC**

International Textile Group, Inc. (the “Company”) pays to W.L. Ross & Co. LLC (“WLR”) fees for certain management services provided by WLRto the Company pursuant to an unwritten arrangement. These services may include, but are not limited to, consulting and advisory services in connection with strategic and financial planning, investment management and administration, as well as othermatters relating to the business and operations of the Company of a type customarily provided by sponsors of U.S. private equity firms to companies in which they have substantial investments, including, without limitation, any such consulting oradvisory services which the Board of Directors of the Company reasonably requests that WLR provide to the Company (the “Services”). 

In exchangefor the provision of the Services, the Company pays WLR $500,000 per calendar quarter.
JONES v. DAVIS.

No. 232A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 21, 2004.

Urs R. Gsteiger, Elizabeth Horton, Howard C. Jones, II, Winston-Salem, for Jones, Southard, Bowers and Sammons.

Fred Folger, Jr., Edwin M. Woltz, Mount Airy, for Surry County.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th day of June 2004 by Defendants to Extend Time to File Brief:

> "Motion Allowed. Defendant (Davis and Allred) shall have up to and including the 13th day of August 2004 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 21st day of June 2004."
Christopher YOUNG, Petitioner, v. Rehka HALLIGAN.

No. 19-8084.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 26, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
# Official Journal C 327/19 S

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 327 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5719 September 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 327

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5719 September 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 327/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 327/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2014/C 327/02 | Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty (General Block Exemption Regulation) (1) | 4 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2014/C 327/02

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty (General Block Exemption Regulation) (1)

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
ESTATE OF Earnest Lee BOYLAND, et al., Petitioners, v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al.

No. 19-636

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 21, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Justice Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Exhibit 10.6

AMENDMENT LETTER NO.2 TO TRADE MARK LICENCE BETWEEN  VIRGIN ENTERPRISES LIMITED AND VIRGIN MEDIA LIMITED

Virgin
Media Limited
160 Great Portland Street
London W1W 5QA

Date:
1st October 2007

Dear
Sirs

Trade Mark Licence between Virgin Enterprises Limited ("VEL") and Virgin Media Limited (formerly NTL Group Limited)("Virgin Media" or the
"Licensee") dated 3 April 2006 (as amended by Amendment Letter 1 (as defined below)) (the "Virgin Media Licence")

Whereas:

In
consideration of the additional royalties payable to VEL under the Virgin Media Licence (as amended in accordance with the terms of this Amendment Letter 2), VEL and the
Licensee agree to amend the Virgin Media Licence, with effect from 1 October 2007, as follows:

1.     Definitions



1

---







"Virgin 1 Logo"means the "Virgin 1" logo for the Virgin 1 Channel as set out at Appendix 1.

2.     Rights relating to the Virgin 1 Channel

2

---







3

---





3.     Audience Share

4.     Marketing

5.     Royalties

4

---







6.     Minimum Period and Termination by Licensee

7.     General

5

---



Please
confirm your acceptance of the terms of this Amendment Letter 2 by signing where indicated below.

|/s/ GORDON MCCALLUMfor and on behalf of Virgin Enterprises Limited |  |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------ |  |  | 
|/s/ ROBERT MACKENZIEfor and on behalf of Virgin Media Limited      |  |  | 

6

---



[APPENDIXES OMITTED]

7

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alesco Financial Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James J. McEntee, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ James J. McEntee, III
|James J. McEntee, III    
|Chief Executive Officer  

November 3, 2006
CERTIFICATIONS



I, Richard B. Vincent, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of STAT Software, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date:  November
12, 2004



/s/ Richard B. Vincent

Treasurer
**
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of BC Partners LendingCorporation (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward Goldthorpe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended; and 

 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company. 

Date: February 7, 2019 

 

/s/ Edward Goldthorpe
Edward Goldthorpe*Chief Executive Officer***
# Official Journal L 124/2013

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.124.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 124 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 564 May 2013 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.124.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 124

English edition

Legislation

Volume 564 May 2013

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | RECOMMENDATIONS |
| | | 2013/179/EU |
| | * | Commission Recommendation of 9 April 2013 on the use of common methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organisations (1) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

RECOMMENDATIONS

2013/179/EU

*

Commission Recommendation of 9 April 2013 on the use of common methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organisations (1)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Modena 3 Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending April 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christopher
Penner, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Christopher Penner
--------------------------
Christopher Penner
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer

June 14, 2004
Ashley STEPHENSON v. Gary BARTLETT.

No. 94PA02-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 30, 2004.

Phillip J. Strach, Cary, Robert N. Hunter, Jr., Greensboro, for Stephenson et al.

Tiare B. Smiley, Special Deputy Attorney General, for Bartlett et al.

Roger W. Knight, for Richard Morgan.

J. Donald Cowan, Greensboro, for Marc Basnight.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th day of January 2004 by Plaintiff-Appellants for Injunctive Relief:

> "Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 30th day of January 2004."

Justices ORR and MARTIN recused.
Independent Auditors' Report


To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
Smith Barney Equity Funds:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements
of the Smith Barney Social Awareness Fund of Smith Barney Equity
Funds (the Fund) for the year ended January 31, 2003, we
considered its internal control, including control activities for
safeguarding securities, in order to determine our auditing
procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the
financial statements and to comply with the requirements of Form
N-SAR, not to provide assurance on internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Those controls include the safeguarding of assets against
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, error or
fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any
evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to
the risk that it may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in internal control that might be material
weaknesses under standards established by the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness is a
condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the
internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low
level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in
amounts that would be material in relation to the financial
statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a
timely period by employees in the normal course of performing
their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters involving
internal control and its operation, including controls for
safeguarding securities, that we consider to be material
weaknesses as defined above as of January 31, 2003.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management and the Board of Trustees of the Fund and the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not intended to be and
should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.



                                             KPMG LLP
New York, New York
March 12, 2003
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q REPORTOFREDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC.PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(CHAPTER 63, TITLE 18 U.S.C. SS.SS. 1350(a) AND (b))**

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350(a) and(b)), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2007 of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in suchReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

**Date:  April 26, 2007**
| /s/ STEVEN J. JANUSEK                      |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| Steven J. Janusek, Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63,Title 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350(a) and (b)), is not a part of the Form 10-Qto which it refers and is, to the extent permitted by law, provided by theabove signatory to the extent of his knowledge.

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by ReddyIce Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

----
In the Matter of Karina Marin CANSECO, A Minor Child.

No. 90P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 6, 2004.

Theresa A. Boucher, Assistant County Attorney, for Forsyth Co. DSS.

Douglas R. Vreeland, Winston-Salem, for Guardian ad Litem.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 26th day of February 2004 by Petitioners (Forsyth County Department of Social Services and Guardian Ad Litem) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of May 2004."
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**        I,Darren L. Miles, Chief Financial Officer of Earth Biofuels, Inc.,certify that:        1.        I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Earth Biofuels, Inc.;        2.        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;        3.        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;        4.        The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:                                a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and         c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and        5.        The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):                                a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.   Date: May 18, 2007    /s/ Darren L. Miles  Darren L. Miles