# Official Journal C 19/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 19 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6320 January 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 19

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6320 January 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2020/C 19/01 | Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2020/C 19/01

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2020/C 19/02 | Case C-92/16: Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 July 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 1 de Fuenlabrada — Spain) — Bankia SA v Henry-Rodolfo Rengifo Jiménez, Sheyla-Jeanneth Felix Caiza (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Articles 6 and 7 — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Accelerated repayment term in a mortgage loan agreement — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Question identical to a question on which the Court has already ruled or where the reply to such a question may be clearly deduced from existing case-law — Declaration that the term is unfair in part — Powers of the national court when dealing with a term regarded as ‘unfair’ — Replacement of the unfair term with a provision of national law — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Question manifestly inadmissible) | 2 |
| 2020/C 19/03 | Case C-167/16: Order of the Court of Justice (First Chamber) of 3 July 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 2 de Santander — Spain) — Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA v Fernando Quintano Ujeta, María Isabel Sánchez García (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Articles 6 and 7 — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Accelerated repayment clause of a mortgage loan contract — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Question identical to a question on which the Court has already ruled or where the reply to such a question may be clearly deduced from existing case-law — Declaration that the clause is unfair in part — Powers of a national court when dealing with a term regarded as ‘unfair’ — Replacement of the unfair term with a provision of national law — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Question manifestly inadmissible) | 3 |
| 2020/C 19/04 | Case C-486/16: Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 July 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 6 de Alicante — Spain) — Bankia SA v Alfredo Sánchez Martínez, Sandra Sánchez Triviño (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Articles 6 and 7 — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Accelerated repayment term in a mortgage loan agreement — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Question identical to a question on which the Court has already ruled or where the reply to such a question may be clearly deduced from existing case-law — Powers of the national court when dealing with a term regarded as ‘unfair’ — Replacement of the unfair term with a provision of national law — Principle of effectiveness — Principle of procedural autonomy) | 4 |
| 2020/C 19/05 | Case C-801/18: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 September 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil supérieur de la Sécurité sociale — Luxembourg) — EU v Caisse pour l’avenir des enfants (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Freedom of movement for workers — Equal treatment — Article 45 TFEU — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 4 — Social security convention concluded between the Member State of employment and a non-member country — Family allowances — Application to a frontier worker who is neither a national nor a resident of one of the Contracting States to the convention) | 4 |
| 2020/C 19/06 | Case C-262/19: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 July 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Polymeles Protodikeio Athinon — Greece) — RM, SN v Agrotiki Trapeza Ellados (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — State aid — Creation of mortgages guaranteeing bank loans granted to farmers — National legislation imposing a cap on the sums in respect of which the mortgages are created — Inadequate statement of reasons which prompted the referring court to inquire about the interpretation of EU law — Manifest inadmissibility) | 5 |
| 2020/C 19/07 | Case C-491/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny we Wrocławiu (Poland) lodged on 27 July 2018 — Mennica Wrocławska sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej we Wrocławiu | 6 |
| 2020/C 19/08 | Case C-583/19 P: Appeal brought on 30 July 2019 by Belén Bernaldo de Quirós against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 5 June 2019 in Case T-273/18 Bernaldo de Quirós v Commission | 6 |
| 2020/C 19/09 | Case C-612/19 P: Appeal brought on 14 August 2019 by CC against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 13 June 2019 in Case T-248/17 RENV, CC v Parliament | 7 |
| 2020/C 19/10 | Case C-655/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia (Romania) lodged on 30 August 2019 — LN v Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Sibiu, Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Brașov | 8 |
| 2020/C 19/11 | Case C-709/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 25 September 2019 — Vereniging van Effectenbezitters v BP plc | 9 |
| 2020/C 19/12 | Case C-719/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 30 September 2019 – FS v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid | 10 |
| 2020/C 19/13 | Case C-720/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 30 September 2019 — GR v Stadt Duisburg | 10 |
| 2020/C 19/14 | Case C-738/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 7 October 2019 — A v B, C | 11 |
| 2020/C 19/15 | Case C-742/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije (Slovenia) lodged on 10 October 2019 — B. K. v Republic of Slovenia | 12 |
| 2020/C 19/16 | Case C-746/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 17 de Barcelona (Spain) lodged on 14 October 2019 — UD v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Barcelona | 12 |
| 2020/C 19/17 | Case C-756/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) (Portugal) lodged on 15 October 2019 — Ramada Storax SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira | 13 |
| 2020/C 19/18 | Case C-758/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Polymeles Protodikeio Athinon (Greece) lodged on 16 October 2019 — OH v ID | 14 |
| 2020/C 19/19 | Case C-760/19: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (United Kingdom) made on 16 October 2019 – JCM Europe (UK) Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs | 15 |
| 2020/C 19/20 | Case C-766/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca dos Açores (Portugal) lodged on 18 October 2019 — QE, RD v SATA Internacional — Serviços de Transportes Aéreos SA | 15 |
| 2020/C 19/21 | Case C-768/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 18 October 2019 — Bundesrepublik Deutschland v SE | 16 |
| 2020/C 19/22 | Case C-771/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias (Greece) lodged on 21 October 2019 — NAMA Symvouloi Michanikoi kai Meletites A.E. — LDK Symvouloi Michanikoi A.E., NAMA Symvouloi Michanikoi kai Meletites A.E.,LDK Symvouloi Michanikoi A.E.v Αrchi Εxetasis Prodikastikon prosfygon (ΑΕPP), ATTIKO METRO A.E. | 18 |
| 2020/C 19/23 | Case C-774/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije (Slovenia) lodged on 22 October 2019 — A.B. and B.B. v Personal Exchange International Limited | 19 |
| 2020/C 19/24 | Case C-776/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de grande instance de Paris (France) lodged on 22 October 2019 — VB, WA v BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA | 19 |
| 2020/C 19/25 | Case C-777/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de grande instance de Paris (France) lodged on 22 October 2019 — XZ, YY v BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA | 21 |
| 2020/C 19/26 | Case C-778/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de grande instance de Paris (France) lodged on 22 October 2019 — ZX v BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA | 23 |
| 2020/C 19/27 | Case C-779/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de grande instance de Paris (France) lodged on 22 October 2019 — AV v BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA, Procureur de la République | 24 |
| 2020/C 19/28 | Case C-780/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de grande instance de Paris (France) lodged on 22 October 2019 — BW, CX v BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA, Procureur de la République | 26 |
| 2020/C 19/29 | Case C-781/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de grande instance de Paris (France) lodged on 22 October 2019 — DY, EX v BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA | 28 |
| 2020/C 19/30 | Case C-782/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de grande instance de Paris (France) lodged on 22 October 2019 — FA v BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA, Procureur de la République | 29 |
| 2020/C 19/31 | Case C-783/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona (Spain) lodged on 22 October 2019 — Comité Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne v GB | 31 |
| 2020/C 19/32 | Case C-795/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus (Estonia) lodged on 29 October 2019 — XX v Tartu Vangla | 32 |
| 2020/C 19/33 | Case C-799/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Košice I (Slovakia) lodged on 30 October 2019 — NI, OJ, PK v Sociálna poisťovňa | 32 |
| 2020/C 19/34 | Case C-812/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 4 November 2019 — Danske Bank A/S v Skatteverket | 33 |
| 2020/C 19/35 | Case C-813/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the cour d’appel d’Aix-en-Provence (France) lodged on 5 November 2019 — MN | 34 |
| 2020/C 19/36 | Case C-821/19: Action brought on 8 November 2019 — European Commission v Hungary | 34 |
| 2020/C 19/37 | Case C-847/19 P: Appeal brought on 20 November 2019 by Achemos Grupė UAB, Achema AB against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 12 September 2019 in Case T-417/16: Achemos Grupė and Achema AB v Commission | 35 |
| 2020/C 19/38 | Case C-849/19: Action brought on 21 November 2019 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic | 36 |
| 2020/C 19/39 | Case C-856/19: Action brought on 25 November 2019 — European Commission v Hungary | 37 |
| 2020/C 19/40 | Case C-569/17: Order of the President of the Court of 10 July 2019 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain, intervener: French Republic | 38 |
| 2020/C 19/41 | C-580/18 P: Order of the President of the Sixth Chamber of the Court of 14 August 2019 — Nestlé Unternehmungen Deutschland GmbH v Lotte Co. Ltd, European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIP) | 38 |
| 2020/C 19/42 | Case C-751/18: Order of the President of the Court of 29 August 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) — Portugal) — Totalmédia — Marketing Directo e Publicidade S.A. v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira | 39 |
| 2020/C 19/43 | Case C-781/18: Order of the President of the Court of 16 July 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Roma — Italy) — Società Italiana degli Autori ed Editori (S.I.A.E.) v Soundreef Ltd | 39 |
| 2020/C 19/44 | C-180/19: Order of the President of the Court of 11 July 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the l’Amtsgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — flightright GmbH/Eurowings GmbH | 39 |
| 2020/C 19/45 | Case C-247/19: Order of the President of the Court of 19 July 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia e Instrucción de Ceuta — Spain) — HC, ID v Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. | 40 |
| 2020/C 19/46 | Case C-327/19: Order of the President of the Court of 29 August 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus — Finland) — Proceedings brought by Nobina Finland Oy | 40 |
| 2020/C 19/47 | Case C-345/19: Order of the President of the Court of 26 August 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — EUflight.de GmbH v Eurowings GmbH | 40 |
| 2020/C 19/48 | Case C-370/19: Order of the President of the Court of 22 July 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg — Germany) — GE v Société Air France | 41 |
| | General Court |
| 2020/C 19/49 | Case T-287/16 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 26 November 2019 — Belgium v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Expenditure incurred by Belgium — Export refunds — No recovery resulting from negligence attributable to a body of a Member State — Non-exhaustion of all possible remedies — Proportionality) | 42 |
| 2020/C 19/50 | Case T-502/16: Judgment of the General Court of 20 November 2019 — Missir Mamachi di Lusignano and Others v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Murder of an official and his wife — Obligation to ensure the safety of staff in the service of the European Union — Liability of the institution for non-material damage suffered by the family members of a deceased official — Mother, brother and sister of the official — Action for damages — Admissibility — Standing to bring proceedings under Article 270 TFEU — Person covered by the Staff Regulations — Reasonable period of time) | 43 |
| 2020/C 19/51 | Case T-31/18: Judgment of the General Court of 27 November 2019 –Izuzquiza and Semsrott v Frontex (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to a naval operation carried out by Frontex in the central Mediterranean in 2017 — Vessels deployed — Refusal of access — Article 4(1)(a) of Regulation No 1049/2001 — Exception relating to the protection of the public interest in the field of public security) | 44 |
| 2020/C 19/52 | Case T-527/18: Judgment of the General Court of 21 November 2019 — K.A. Schmersal Holding v EUIPO — Tecnium (tec.nicum) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark tec.nicum — Earlier national figurative mark TECNIUM — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the services — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 18(1) and Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character — Evidence submitted for the first time before the General Court) | 44 |
| 2020/C 19/53 | Case T-592/18: Judgment of the General Court of 28 November 2019 — Wywiał-Prząda v Commission (Civil service — Contract staff — Remuneration — Decision refusing to grant expatriation allowance — Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Work done for another State — Diplomatic status — Five-year reference period) | 45 |
| 2020/C 19/54 | Case T-642/18: Judgment of the General Court of 28 November 2019 — August Wolff v EUIPO Faes Farma (DermoFaes Atopimed) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark DermoFaes Atopimed — Earlier EU word mark Dermowas — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 46 |
| 2020/C 19/55 | Case T-643/18: Judgment of the General Court of 28 November 2019 — August Wolff v EUIPO — Faes Farma (DermoFaes) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark DermoFaes — Earlier EU word mark Dermowas — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 46 |
| 2020/C 19/56 | Case T-695/18: Judgment of the General Court of 20 November 2019 — Werner v EUIPO — Merck (fLORAMED) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark fLORAMED — Earlier EU word mark MEDIFLOR — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 47 |
| 2020/C 19/57 | Case T-711/18: Judgment of the General Court of 26 November 2019 — Wyld v EUIPO — Kaufland Warenhandel (wyld) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark wyld — Earlier international word mark WILD CRISP — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Rejection in part of the application for registration) | 48 |
| 2020/C 19/58 | Case T- 276/13 RENV: Order of the General Court of 14 November 2019 — Growth Energy and Renewable Fuels Association v Council (Dumping — Imports of bioethanol originating in the United States — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Repeal of the contested act — No longer any legal interest in bringing proceedings — No need to adjudicate) | 48 |
| 2020/C 19/59 | Case T-618/18: Order of the General Court of 21 November 2019 — ZI v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Cover by the Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme — Affiliation of the official’s spouse — No interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissibility) | 49 |
| 2020/C 19/60 | Case T-740/18 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 26 September 2019 — Taminco v Commission (Application for interim measures — Plant protection products — Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 — Active substance thiram — Conditions of approval for placing on the market — Application for suspension of operation — Lack of urgency) | 50 |
| 2020/C 19/61 | Case T-147/19: Order of the General Court of 14 November 2019 — Flovax v EUIPO — Dagniaux and Gervais Danone (GLACIER DAGNIAUX DEPUIS 1923) (EU trade mark — Application for a declaration of invalidity — Application for European Union figurative mark GLACIER DAGNIAUX DEPUIS 1923 — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate) | 50 |
| 2020/C 19/62 | Case T-181/19: Order of the General Court of 18 November 2019 — Dickmanns v EUIPO (Civil Service — Members of the temporary staff — Fixed-term contract with a termination clause — Clause terminating the contract in the event that the name of the agent is not included on the reserve list of a competition — Purely confirmatory act — Time limit for complaints — Inadmissibility) | 51 |
| 2020/C 19/63 | Case T-518/19 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 26 September 2019 — Sipcam Oxon v Commission (Application for interim measures — Plant protection products — Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 — Active substance chlorothalonil — Conditions of approval for placing on the market — Application for suspension of operation — Lack of urgency) | 52 |
| 2020/C 19/64 | Case T-549/19 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 26 September 2019 — Medac Gesellschaft für klinische Spezialpräparate v Commission (Application for interim measures — Orphan medicinal product — Application to suspend operation of a measure — No urgency) | 53 |
| 2020/C 19/65 | Case T-568/19 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 26 September 2019 — Micreos Food Safety v Commission (Application for interim measures — Bacteriophage — Listeria — ListexTM P100 — Inadmissibility) | 53 |
| 2020/C 19/66 | Case T-719/19: Action brought on 23 October 2019 – Northgate and Northgate Europe v Commission | 54 |
| 2020/C 19/67 | Case T-726/19: Action brought on 25 October 2019 – LSEGH (Luxembourg) and London Stock Exchange Group Holdings (Italy) v Commission | 55 |
| 2020/C 19/68 | Case T-728/19: Action brought on 29 October 2019 — PL v Commission | 56 |
| 2020/C 19/69 | Case T-731/19: Action brought on 29 October 2019 – Arris Global v Commission | 57 |
| 2020/C 19/70 | Case T-79/19: Order of the General Court of 18 November 2019 — Lantmännen and Lantmännen Agroetanol v Commission | 58 |
| 2020/C 19/71 | Case T-537/19: Order of the General Court of 12 November 2019 — DK v GSA | 58 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2020/C 19/02

Case C-92/16: Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 July 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 1 de Fuenlabrada — Spain) — Bankia SA v Henry-Rodolfo Rengifo Jiménez, Sheyla-Jeanneth Felix Caiza (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Articles 6 and 7 — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Accelerated repayment term in a mortgage loan agreement — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Question identical to a question on which the Court has already ruled or where the reply to such a question may be clearly deduced from existing case-law — Declaration that the term is unfair in part — Powers of the national court when dealing with a term regarded as ‘unfair’ — Replacement of the unfair term with a provision of national law — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Question manifestly inadmissible)

2

2020/C 19/03

Case C-167/16: Order of the Court of Justice (First Chamber) of 3 July 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 2 de Santander — Spain) — Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA v Fernando Quintano Ujeta, María Isabel Sánchez García (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Articles 6 and 7 — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Accelerated repayment clause of a mortgage loan contract — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Question identical to a question on which the Court has already ruled or where the reply to such a question may be clearly deduced from existing case-law — Declaration that the clause is unfair in part — Powers of a national court when dealing with a term regarded as ‘unfair’ — Replacement of the unfair term with a provision of national law — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Question manifestly inadmissible)

3

2020/C 19/04

Case C-486/16: Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 July 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 6 de Alicante — Spain) — Bankia SA v Alfredo Sánchez Martínez, Sandra Sánchez Triviño (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Articles 6 and 7 — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Accelerated repayment term in a mortgage loan agreement — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Question identical to a question on which the Court has already ruled or where the reply to such a question may be clearly deduced from existing case-law — Powers of the national court when dealing with a term regarded as ‘unfair’ — Replacement of the unfair term with a provision of national law — Principle of effectiveness — Principle of procedural autonomy)

4

2020/C 19/05

Case C-801/18: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 September 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil supérieur de la Sécurité sociale — Luxembourg) — EU v Caisse pour l’avenir des enfants (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Freedom of movement for workers — Equal treatment — Article 45 TFEU — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 4 — Social security convention concluded between the Member State of employment and a non-member country — Family allowances — Application to a frontier worker who is neither a national nor a resident of one of the Contracting States to the convention)

4

2020/C 19/06

Case C-262/19: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 July 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Polymeles Protodikeio Athinon — Greece) — RM, SN v Agrotiki Trapeza Ellados (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — State aid — Creation of mortgages guaranteeing bank loans granted to farmers — National legislation imposing a cap on the sums in respect of which the mortgages are created — Inadequate statement of reasons which prompted the referring court to inquire about the interpretation of EU law — Manifest inadmissibility)

5

2020/C 19/07

Case C-491/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny we Wrocławiu (Poland) lodged on 27 July 2018 — Mennica Wrocławska sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej we Wrocławiu

6

2020/C 19/08

Case C-583/19 P: Appeal brought on 30 July 2019 by Belén Bernaldo de Quirós against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 5 June 2019 in Case T-273/18 Bernaldo de Quirós v Commission

6

2020/C 19/09

Case C-612/19 P: Appeal brought on 14 August 2019 by CC against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 13 June 2019 in Case T-248/17 RENV, CC v Parliament

7

2020/C 19/10

Case C-655/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia (Romania) lodged on 30 August 2019 — LN v Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Sibiu, Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Brașov

8

2020/C 19/11

Case C-709/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 25 September 2019 — Vereniging van Effectenbezitters v BP plc

9

2020/C 19/12

Case C-719/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 30 September 2019 – FS v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid

10

2020/C 19/13

Case C-720/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 30 September 2019 — GR v Stadt Duisburg

10

2020/C 19/14

Case C-738/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 7 October 2019 — A v B, C

11

2020/C 19/15

Case C-742/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije (Slovenia) lodged on 10 October 2019 — B. K. v Republic of Slovenia

12

2020/C 19/16

Case C-746/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 17 de Barcelona (Spain) lodged on 14 October 2019 — UD v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Barcelona

12

2020/C 19/17

Case C-756/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) (Portugal) lodged on 15 October 2019 — Ramada Storax SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

13

2020/C 19/18

Case C-758/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Polymeles Protodikeio Athinon (Greece) lodged on 16 October 2019 — OH v ID

14

2020/C 19/19

Case C-760/19: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (United Kingdom) made on 16 October 2019 – JCM Europe (UK) Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs

15

2020/C 19/20

Case C-766/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca dos Açores (Portugal) lodged on 18 October 2019 — QE, RD v SATA Internacional — Serviços de Transportes Aéreos SA

15

2020/C 19/21

Case C-768/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 18 October 2019 — Bundesrepublik Deutschland v SE

16

2020/C 19/22

Case C-771/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias (Greece) lodged on 21 October 2019 — NAMA Symvouloi Michanikoi kai Meletites A.E. — LDK Symvouloi Michanikoi A.E., NAMA Symvouloi Michanikoi kai Meletites A.E.,LDK Symvouloi Michanikoi A.E.v Αrchi Εxetasis Prodikastikon prosfygon (ΑΕPP), ATTIKO METRO A.E.

18

2020/C 19/23

Case C-774/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije (Slovenia) lodged on 22 October 2019 — A.B. and B.B. v Personal Exchange International Limited

19

2020/C 19/24

Case C-776/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de grande instance de Paris (France) lodged on 22 October 2019 — VB, WA v BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA

19

2020/C 19/25

Case C-777/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de grande instance de Paris (France) lodged on 22 October 2019 — XZ, YY v BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA

21

2020/C 19/26

Case C-778/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de grande instance de Paris (France) lodged on 22 October 2019 — ZX v BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA

23

2020/C 19/27

Case C-779/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de grande instance de Paris (France) lodged on 22 October 2019 — AV v BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA, Procureur de la République

24

2020/C 19/28

Case C-780/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de grande instance de Paris (France) lodged on 22 October 2019 — BW, CX v BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA, Procureur de la République

26

2020/C 19/29

Case C-781/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de grande instance de Paris (France) lodged on 22 October 2019 — DY, EX v BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA

28

2020/C 19/30

Case C-782/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de grande instance de Paris (France) lodged on 22 October 2019 — FA v BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA, Procureur de la République

29

2020/C 19/31

Case C-783/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona (Spain) lodged on 22 October 2019 — Comité Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne v GB

31

2020/C 19/32

Case C-795/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus (Estonia) lodged on 29 October 2019 — XX v Tartu Vangla

32

2020/C 19/33

Case C-799/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Košice I (Slovakia) lodged on 30 October 2019 — NI, OJ, PK v Sociálna poisťovňa

32

2020/C 19/34

Case C-812/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 4 November 2019 — Danske Bank A/S v Skatteverket

33

2020/C 19/35

Case C-813/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the cour d’appel d’Aix-en-Provence (France) lodged on 5 November 2019 — MN

34

2020/C 19/36

Case C-821/19: Action brought on 8 November 2019 — European Commission v Hungary

34

2020/C 19/37

Case C-847/19 P: Appeal brought on 20 November 2019 by Achemos Grupė UAB, Achema AB against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 12 September 2019 in Case T-417/16: Achemos Grupė and Achema AB v Commission

35

2020/C 19/38

Case C-849/19: Action brought on 21 November 2019 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

36

2020/C 19/39

Case C-856/19: Action brought on 25 November 2019 — European Commission v Hungary

37

2020/C 19/40

Case C-569/17: Order of the President of the Court of 10 July 2019 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain, intervener: French Republic

38

2020/C 19/41

C-580/18 P: Order of the President of the Sixth Chamber of the Court of 14 August 2019 — Nestlé Unternehmungen Deutschland GmbH v Lotte Co. Ltd, European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIP)

38

2020/C 19/42

Case C-751/18: Order of the President of the Court of 29 August 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) — Portugal) — Totalmédia — Marketing Directo e Publicidade S.A. v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

39

2020/C 19/43

Case C-781/18: Order of the President of the Court of 16 July 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Roma — Italy) — Società Italiana degli Autori ed Editori (S.I.A.E.) v Soundreef Ltd

39

2020/C 19/44

C-180/19: Order of the President of the Court of 11 July 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the l’Amtsgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — flightright GmbH/Eurowings GmbH

39

2020/C 19/45

Case C-247/19: Order of the President of the Court of 19 July 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia e Instrucción de Ceuta — Spain) — HC, ID v Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.

40

2020/C 19/46

Case C-327/19: Order of the President of the Court of 29 August 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus — Finland) — Proceedings brought by Nobina Finland Oy

40

2020/C 19/47

Case C-345/19: Order of the President of the Court of 26 August 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — EUflight.de GmbH v Eurowings GmbH

40

2020/C 19/48

Case C-370/19: Order of the President of the Court of 22 July 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg — Germany) — GE v Société Air France

41

General Court

2020/C 19/49

Case T-287/16 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 26 November 2019 — Belgium v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Expenditure incurred by Belgium — Export refunds — No recovery resulting from negligence attributable to a body of a Member State — Non-exhaustion of all possible remedies — Proportionality)

42

2020/C 19/50

Case T-502/16: Judgment of the General Court of 20 November 2019 — Missir Mamachi di Lusignano and Others v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Murder of an official and his wife — Obligation to ensure the safety of staff in the service of the European Union — Liability of the institution for non-material damage suffered by the family members of a deceased official — Mother, brother and sister of the official — Action for damages — Admissibility — Standing to bring proceedings under Article 270 TFEU — Person covered by the Staff Regulations — Reasonable period of time)

43

2020/C 19/51

Case T-31/18: Judgment of the General Court of 27 November 2019 –Izuzquiza and Semsrott v Frontex (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to a naval operation carried out by Frontex in the central Mediterranean in 2017 — Vessels deployed — Refusal of access — Article 4(1)(a) of Regulation No 1049/2001 — Exception relating to the protection of the public interest in the field of public security)

44

2020/C 19/52

Case T-527/18: Judgment of the General Court of 21 November 2019 — K.A. Schmersal Holding v EUIPO — Tecnium (tec.nicum) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark tec.nicum — Earlier national figurative mark TECNIUM — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the services — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 18(1) and Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character — Evidence submitted for the first time before the General Court)

44

2020/C 19/53

Case T-592/18: Judgment of the General Court of 28 November 2019 — Wywiał-Prząda v Commission (Civil service — Contract staff — Remuneration — Decision refusing to grant expatriation allowance — Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Work done for another State — Diplomatic status — Five-year reference period)

45

2020/C 19/54

Case T-642/18: Judgment of the General Court of 28 November 2019 — August Wolff v EUIPO Faes Farma (DermoFaes Atopimed) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark DermoFaes Atopimed — Earlier EU word mark Dermowas — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

46

2020/C 19/55

Case T-643/18: Judgment of the General Court of 28 November 2019 — August Wolff v EUIPO — Faes Farma (DermoFaes) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark DermoFaes — Earlier EU word mark Dermowas — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

46

2020/C 19/56

Case T-695/18: Judgment of the General Court of 20 November 2019 — Werner v EUIPO — Merck (fLORAMED) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark fLORAMED — Earlier EU word mark MEDIFLOR — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

47

2020/C 19/57

Case T-711/18: Judgment of the General Court of 26 November 2019 — Wyld v EUIPO — Kaufland Warenhandel (wyld) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark wyld — Earlier international word mark WILD CRISP — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Rejection in part of the application for registration)

48

2020/C 19/58

Case T- 276/13 RENV: Order of the General Court of 14 November 2019 — Growth Energy and Renewable Fuels Association v Council (Dumping — Imports of bioethanol originating in the United States — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Repeal of the contested act — No longer any legal interest in bringing proceedings — No need to adjudicate)

48

2020/C 19/59

Case T-618/18: Order of the General Court of 21 November 2019 — ZI v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Cover by the Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme — Affiliation of the official’s spouse — No interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissibility)

49

2020/C 19/60

Case T-740/18 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 26 September 2019 — Taminco v Commission (Application for interim measures — Plant protection products — Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 — Active substance thiram — Conditions of approval for placing on the market — Application for suspension of operation — Lack of urgency)

50

2020/C 19/61

Case T-147/19: Order of the General Court of 14 November 2019 — Flovax v EUIPO — Dagniaux and Gervais Danone (GLACIER DAGNIAUX DEPUIS 1923) (EU trade mark — Application for a declaration of invalidity — Application for European Union figurative mark GLACIER DAGNIAUX DEPUIS 1923 — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)

50

2020/C 19/62

Case T-181/19: Order of the General Court of 18 November 2019 — Dickmanns v EUIPO (Civil Service — Members of the temporary staff — Fixed-term contract with a termination clause — Clause terminating the contract in the event that the name of the agent is not included on the reserve list of a competition — Purely confirmatory act — Time limit for complaints — Inadmissibility)

51

2020/C 19/63

Case T-518/19 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 26 September 2019 — Sipcam Oxon v Commission (Application for interim measures — Plant protection products — Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 — Active substance chlorothalonil — Conditions of approval for placing on the market — Application for suspension of operation — Lack of urgency)

52

2020/C 19/64

Case T-549/19 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 26 September 2019 — Medac Gesellschaft für klinische Spezialpräparate v Commission (Application for interim measures — Orphan medicinal product — Application to suspend operation of a measure — No urgency)

53

2020/C 19/65

Case T-568/19 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 26 September 2019 — Micreos Food Safety v Commission (Application for interim measures — Bacteriophage — Listeria — ListexTM P100 — Inadmissibility)

53

2020/C 19/66

Case T-719/19: Action brought on 23 October 2019 – Northgate and Northgate Europe v Commission

54

2020/C 19/67

Case T-726/19: Action brought on 25 October 2019 – LSEGH (Luxembourg) and London Stock Exchange Group Holdings (Italy) v Commission

55

2020/C 19/68

Case T-728/19: Action brought on 29 October 2019 — PL v Commission

56

2020/C 19/69

Case T-731/19: Action brought on 29 October 2019 – Arris Global v Commission

57

2020/C 19/70

Case T-79/19: Order of the General Court of 18 November 2019 — Lantmännen and Lantmännen Agroetanol v Commission

58

2020/C 19/71

Case T-537/19: Order of the General Court of 12 November 2019 — DK v GSA

58

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN