alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Independent Auditors' Report


To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
Consulting Group Capital Markets Funds.:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements
of the Consulting Group Capital Markets Funds (the Fund) for
the year ended August 31, 2001, we considered its internal
control, including control activities for safeguarding
securities, in order to determine our auditing procedures for the
purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and
to comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide
assurance on the internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles. Those controls include the safeguarding of
assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or
fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any
evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to
the risk that it may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in the internal control that might be
material weaknesses under standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness
is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of
the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively
low level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in
amounts that would be material in relation to the financial
statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a
timely period by employees in the normal course of performing
their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters involving
the internal control and its operation, including controls for
safeguarding securities that we consider to be material
weaknesses as defined above.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management, the Board of Trustees of the Fund, and the Securities
and Exchange Commission and is not intended to be and should not
be used by anyone other than the specified parties.



New York, New York
October 12, 2001
GREENWICH STREET SERIES FUND
on behalf of
Equity Index Portfolio (the "Portfolio")

Supplement dated February 25, 1998 to
Prospectus dated April 30, 1997

	The following information supplements, and to the extent 
inconsistent therewith supersedes, the information set forth in the 
Prospectus under "Management of the Fund."

For the investment advisory services provided to it by TIMCO, the 
Portfolio pays TIMCO an annual management fee calculated at a rate of 
0.06% of its average daily net assets, paid monthly.  The Equity 
Index Portfolio pays MMC an annual administration fee of 0.20% of its 
average daily net assets, paid monthly, for administrative services.










FD 01417
STATE of North Carolina v. Randall Hayden HUGHES.

No. 190P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 6, 2004.

Randall Hayden Hughes, Pro Se.

Edwin W. Welch, Special Deputy Attorney General, John Carriker, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 22nd day of April 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of May 2004."
| 1. | Such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2008,      fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the      period ending March 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Modena      6, Inc. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: April      1, 2008                               |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                        |
| /s/      Jacque Bryon Oliphant                              |
| Jacque      Bryon OliphantPresident,      CEO, CFO Director |
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

SILKEARIA MARSHALL, 

Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D23-574

LT Case No. 2017-CF-03527

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/

Decision filed April 11, 2023

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Duval County, 

Mark Borello, Judge.

Jacob Grollman, of Grollman Law, P.A., 

Bradenton, for Appellant.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS, EISNAUGLE and KILBANE, JJ., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk September 26, 2012

h0919 

# Order

September 26, 2012

144842

JAN N ETTE E. YERGEAU,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144842

COA: 301400

Berrien CC: 2009

- 000228

- NM

DONALD L. BLEICH and BLEICH & MAIS,

Defendants

- Appellees,

and

CARL R. BURDICK and BURDICK &

ENGELN, PLC,

Defendants

- Appellants.

_________________________________ _ ____/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 14, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court prior to the

completion of the proceedings ordered by the Court of Appeals.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1265 

To require the continuation of tuition assistance programs for members of 

the Armed Forces for the remainder of fiscal year 2013. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 19, 2013 

Mr. O’ROURKE (for himself, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, and Mr. GIBSON) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Armed Services 

A BILL 

To require the continuation of tuition assistance programs 

for members of the Armed Forces for the remainder 

of fiscal year 2013. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT FOR CONTINUATION OF AU4 THORIZED TUITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS 

5 FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES FOR 

6 REMAINDER OF FISCAL YEAR 2013. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretaries of the military 

8 departments shall carry out tuition assistance programs 

9 for members of the Armed Forces during the remainder 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1265 IH

1 of fiscal year 2013 using amounts specified in subsection 

2 (b). 

3 (b) AMOUNTS.—The minimum amount used by the 

4 Secretary of a military department for tuition assistance 

5 for members of an Armed Force under the jurisdiction of 

6 that Secretary pursuant to subsection (a) shall be not less 

7 than— 

8 (1) the amount appropriated or otherwise made 

9 available by the Consolidated and Further Con10 tinuing Appropriations Act, 2013 for tuition assist11 ance programs for members of that Armed Force, 

12 minus 

13 (2) an amount that is not more than the per14 centage of the reduction required to the Operation 

15 and Maintenance account for that Armed Force for 

16 fiscal year 2013 by the budget sequester required by 

17 section 251A of the Balanced Budget and Emer18 gency Deficit Control Act of 1985. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
CERTIFICATE
                              
      The  undersigned, Controller of SMITH BARNEY MANAGED
MUNICIPALS FUND INC. (the "Fund"), hereby certifies that the
Fund has received  full payment, in  accordance  with  the
provisions of its Prospectus, for 50,376,500 shares of
common stock,  par  value $0.01 per share, the sales  of
which are reported in the Fund's Rule 24f-2 Notice covering
the fiscal year ended February 28, 1997 and that the facts
otherwise stated in such Notice are true.


                                   Thomas M. Reynolds
                                   Controller

Dated:         April 15, 1997
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 136 

To authorize certain civil works projects, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2013 

Ms. MATSUI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To authorize certain civil works projects, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Flood Protection Pub5 lic Safety Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN FLOOD RISK MAN7 AGEMENT PROJECTS. 

8 The Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief 

9 of Engineers, is authorized to implement any flood risk 

10 management project for which, before the date of enactVerDate Mar 15 2010 03:16 Jan 10, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H136.IH H136

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HR 136 IH

1 ment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army has trans2 mitted to Congress a letter that includes— 

3 (1) a description of the project as recommended 

4 in a report by the Chief of Engineers that concludes 

5 that the project is technically sound, environmentally 

6 acceptable, and economically justified; and 

7 (2) notification that the Office of Management 

8 and Budget has concluded that the recommendations 

9 in the report are consistent with the policy and pro10 grams of the President. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350**

Inconnection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SuperiorEssex Inc. (the “*Company*”)for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the “*PeriodicReport*”), I, David S. Aldridge, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to thebest of my knowledge and belief, that the Periodic Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.
| Date: May 9, 2007 | /s/ DAVID S. ALDRIDGE                         |
|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|              | David S. Aldridge

*Chief  Financial Officer* |

 

----
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-2 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and
represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of
April 18, 2018, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-2 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the
Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By:

/s/ Sandra M. BroderickName:

Sandra M. BroderickTitle:

EVP Head of OperationsDate:

March 29, 2019By:

/s/ Andrew KangName:

Andrew KangTitle:

TreasurerDate:

March 29, 2019
HARGROVE v. BATTS & INSURANCE.

No. 480P03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2004.

Amanda M. Willis, Greensboro, for Batt Temp. Service, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd day of December 2003 by Plaintiff for Reconsideration on Appeal:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 5th day of February 2004."
(logo)Rialto 

         CAPITAL

 

 

**2017 AnnualStatement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)**

 

Poolingand Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as ofDecember 1, 2017 by and among UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization, Corp. asDepositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, RialtoCapital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance, LLC asOperating Advisor and as Asset Representative Reviewer, Wilmington Trust,National Association, as Trustee, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association,Certificate Administrator, relating to the UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust2017-C6, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2017-C6 **(UBS2017-C6)**

 

Theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, asspecial servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1.      All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under thePooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the SpecialServicer.

 

2.      A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicerfor the period of December 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”)in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted undermy supervision.

 

3.      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and ServicingAgreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there hasbeen a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, eachfailure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identifiedherein.

 

 

Certifiedby: /s/AdamSinger                                                                        Date: March 1, 2018

    Adam Singer,Managing Director
Independent Auditors' Consent




To the Shareholders and Trustees of
Smith Barney Massachusetts Municipals Fund:
We consent to the incorporation by reference, in this Prospectus and
 Statement of Additional Information, of our report dated January
 12, 2001, on the statement of assets and liabilities for the Smith
 Barney Massachusetts Municipals Fund (the "Fund") as of November 30,
 2000 and the related statement of operations for the year then ended,
 the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years
 in the two-year period then ended and the financial highlights for
 each of the years in the five-year period t
We also consent to the references to our firm under the headings
 "Financial Highlights"in the Prospectus and "Auditors" in the
 Statement of Additional Information.



KPMG LLP
New York, New York
March 23, 2001
Page
exas_Ex10-1



		

			Exhibit 10.1

		





		
			Amendment No. 3
		

		
			to
		

		
			Exact Sciences Corporation
		

		
			2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
		

		
			 
		

		
			AMENDMENT NO. 3 (the “Amendment”), to the 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Existing Plan”; as amended hereby, the “Plan”) of EXACT SCIENCES CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), is adopted by the Company as of April 24, 2019.
		

		
			Statement of Purpose
		

		
			The Existing Plan was originally approved by the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) on April 15, 2010, and by the Company’s stockholders on July 16, 2010, upon which date it became effective. The Existing Plan was subsequently amended by Amendment No. 1 and Amendment No. 2, each of which increased the number of shares available for issuance under the Existing Plan and each of which was approved by the Company’s stockholders. Under Article 15 of the Existing Plan, the Board may amend the Existing Plan at any time, subject to the approval of the stockholders if the amendment will (i) increase the number of shares that may be issued under the Plan; (ii) change the class of employees eligible to receive options under the Plan, if such action would be treated as the adoption of a new plan for purposes of Section 423(b) of the Code; or (iii) cause Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to become inapplicable to the Plan. The Board has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company to extend the term of the Existing Plan for an additional ten years from the Plan’s current termination date, so that the term of the Plan is extended for ten years, to October 31, 2030.   Such action does not require stockholder approval under Section 423 of the Code or otherwise under the terms of the Plan or applicable law.
		

		
			NOW, THEREFORE, the Existing Plan is hereby amended as follows:
		

		
			1. Capitalized Terms. All capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings given thereto in the Existing Plan.
		

		
			2. Amendment to Existing Plan.
		

		
			The first sentence of Article 15 - Termination and Amendments to Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
		

		
			“Unless terminated sooner as provided below, the Plan shall terminate on October 31, 2030.”
		

		
			3. Reference to and Effect on the Plan. The Plan, as amended hereby, and all other documents, instruments and agreements executed or delivered in connection therewith, shall remain in full force and effect, and are hereby ratified and confirmed. 
		

		
			4. Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware. 
		

		
			***
		

		
			Effective this 24th day of April 2019.
EXHIBIT 32

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         The undersigned, John M. Sharpe, Jr., hereby certifies as follows:

         1. I am the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of
Inner Systems, Inc. (the "Company").

         2. To the best of my knowledge, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report") complies in all
material respects with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

         3. To the best of my knowledge based upon a review of the Report, the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period
audited.


 SIGNATURE                             TITLE                        DATE



 /s/ John M. Sharpe, Jr.      President,                      November 19, 2004
 -----------------------      Chief Executive Officer
 John M. Sharpe, Jr.          and Chief Financial Officer
STATE of North Carolina v. Gregory Alan KIRBY.

No. 188P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 12, 2004.

Gregory Alan Kirby, Pro Se.

Anne M. Middleton, Assistant Attorney General, G. Dewey Hudson, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 21st day of April 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of *366Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th day of August 2004."

Justice WAINWRIGHT recused.
In the Matter of Dakota Fermin ZARATE Jacob Daniel Zarate.

No. 616P03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2004.

Janet K. Ledbetter, Hillsborough, for Burns.

Jamie L. Hamlett, for Alamance DSS.

Robert E. Collins, Guardian ad Litem, Attorney Adv., for Zarates.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Respondent on the 25th day of November 2003 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2004."
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1495 

To prohibit the further extension or establishment of national monuments 

in Arizona except by express authorization of Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 11, 2013 

Mr. GOSAR (for himself, Mr. SALMON, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, and Mr. 

SCHWEIKERT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To prohibit the further extension or establishment of national 

monuments in Arizona except by express authorization 

of Congress. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Arizona Land Sov5 ereignty Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1495 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON FURTHER EXTENSION OR ESTAB2 LISHMENT OF NATIONAL MONUMENTS IN AR3 IZONA. 

4 The proviso of the last sentence of the first section 

5 of the Act of September 14, 1950 (64 Stat. 849, chapter 

6 950; 16 U.S.C. 431a), is amended by inserting ‘‘or Ari7 zona’’ after ‘‘Wyoming’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
STATE of North Carolina v. Anthony Dewayne JOHNSON.

No. 235P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 24, 2004.

Anthony Dewayne Johnson, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Ronald L. Moore, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 3rd day of May 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."
Chris Ann JAYE, Petitioner, v. OAK KNOLL VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., et al.

No. 18-1374.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.