alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of the
High Income Opportunity Fund Inc.:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements of the High
Income Opportunity Fund Inc. (the "Fund") for the year ended September 30,
2000, we considered its internal control, including control activities for
safeguarding securities, in order to determine our auditing procedures for the
purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and to comply
with the requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on the internal
control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and maintaining
internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments
by management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs
of controls.  Generally, controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the
entity's objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.  Those controls include the safeguarding of assets against
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or fraud may occur
and not be detected.  Also, projection of any evaluation of internal control
to future periods is subject to the risk that it may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily disclose all
matters in the internal control that might be material weaknesses under
standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants.  A material weakness is a condition in which the design or
operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce to
a relatively low level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in
amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements being
audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in
the normal course of performing their assigned functions.  However, we noted
no matters involving the internal control and its operation, including
controls for safeguarding securities that we consider to be material
weaknesses as defined above.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of management, the
Board of Directors of the Fund, and the Securities and Exchange Commission and
is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these
specified parties.



New York, New York
November 13, 2000
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Salvatore A. Longo, Defendant.

County Court, Special Term, Nassau County,

August 16, 1973.

*906
      *William Cahn, District Attorney,*for plaintiff. *Leon Stern*for defendant.

John S. Lockman, J.

Motion by. the People for an order directing the defendant to submit to a blood test and examination of his scalp hair, facial hair and pubic hair and the taking of samples therefrom, and permitting the presence at such examination of representatives of the Nassau County Police Department and the taking of said samples into custody and transporting the same to the Nassau County Police Department Scientific Investigation Bureau for analysis, is in all respects granted, provided that the attorney for the defendant be permitted to be present throughout such examination and removal of samples from the defendant; and the defendant is accordingly directed to appear at the Nassau County Medical Center, Hempstead Turnpike, Bast Meadow, at 9:30 a.m., on September 27, 1973, or such other time and/or place agreed in writing by attorneys for the parties. *(Schmerber*v. *California,*384 U. S. 757; *People*v. *Robinson,*27 N Y 2d 864; *People*v. *Loria,*10 N Y 2d 368; *People*v. *Gladman,*Nassau County Ct., June 9, 1972, Kelly, J.)
NORTH CAROLINA INDUSTRIAL CAPITAL, LLC v. David RUSHING and John Calyton, d/b/a West's Charlotte Metro Moving & Storage and West's Charlotte Transfer & Storage, Inc.

No. 157P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 6, 2004.

Eric D. Levine, Charlotte, for West's Charlotte Transfer & Storage.

Stephen Koehler, Charlotte, for NC Industrial Capital, LLC.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant (West's Charlotte Transfer & Storage, Inc.) on the 5th day of April 2004 for Writ of Supersedeas and Motion for Temporary Stay of the judgment of the Court of Appeals in this matter, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of April 2004."
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4232 — Scottish & Newcastle/Kuehne + Nagel/JV)

(2006/C 127/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

----
Exhibit 35.1



ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE



Synchrony Bank (the “Servicer”) hereby
certifies as of December 31, 2021 as follows:



| | 1. | The undersigned has reviewed, for the period beginning January 1, 2021 and ending December 31, 2021: (a) the activities of the Servicer
as they related to the Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2018, between Synchrony Card Issuance Trust and the
Servicer (the “Servicing Agreement”) and (b) the Servicer’s performance under the Servicing Agreement. Such review
of the activities of the Servicer and the performance by the Servicer of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement has been made by
persons under the direct supervision of the undersigned.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best knowledge of the undersigned, based on my review of the Servicer’s performance under the Servicing Agreement, the
Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects for the period beginning January
1, 2021 and ending December 31, 2021.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This report is delivered pursuant to Item
1123 of Regulation AB.



| | SYNCHRONY BANK
| | --------------
|
| | By:           
| | Name:         
| | Title:        



SYNIT: Bank Compliance
Certificate
James A. LACKEY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6759

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor, with whom Justice Ginsburg joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari:

I dissent for the reasons set out in *Brown* v. *United States* , 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 14, 202 L.Ed.2d 302 (2018) (Sotomayor, J., dissenting).
# Official Journal L 150/2023

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 150 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 669 June 2023 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 150

English edition

Legislation

Volume 669 June 2023

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2023/1113 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2023 on information accompanying transfers of funds and certain crypto-assets and amending Directive (EU) 2015/849 (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2023 on markets in crypto-assets, and amending Regulations (EU) No 1093/2010 and (EU) No 1095/2010 and Directives 2013/36/EU and (EU) 2019/1937 (
  1
  ) | 40 |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2023/1115 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2023 on the making available on the Union market and the export from the Union of certain commodities and products associated with deforestation and forest degradation and repealing Regulation (EU) No 995/2010  (
  1
  ) | 206 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) 2023/1113 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2023 on information accompanying transfers of funds and certain crypto-assets and amending Directive (EU) 2015/849 (
  1
  )

1

1

*

Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2023 on markets in crypto-assets, and amending Regulations (EU) No 1093/2010 and (EU) No 1095/2010 and Directives 2013/36/EU and (EU) 2019/1937 (
  1
  )

1

40

*

Regulation (EU) 2023/1115 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2023 on the making available on the Union market and the export from the Union of certain commodities and products associated with deforestation and forest degradation and repealing Regulation (EU) No 995/2010  (
  1
  )

1

206

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Mauricio LARA-BONILLA, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6272

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03 - 0 2 - 00 250 - CR

In re Kennith Wayne Thomas

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF RUNNELS COUNTY, 119TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 3852 , HONORABLE CURT F. STEIB , JUDGE PRESIDING

Kennith Wayne Thomas appeals from an order dismissing his pro se motion for forensic DNA testing of evidence relating to his conviction for aggravated sexual assault. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. arts. 64.01

- .05 (West Supp. 2002). 1 We will affirm the district court = s order. In his motion, Thomas requested DNA testing of hair and blood samples taken from him following his arrest. The motion was not supported by the required affidavit. Id . art. 64.01(a). Nevertheless, the court instructed the State to respond to the motion. Id . art. 64.02. In its response, the State informed the court that no physical evidence was obtained during the investigation of this case. The court thereafter dismissed Thomas = s motion finding that the motion did not comply with the statutory requirements, that there is no evidence subject to DNA testing and, alternatively, that the testing of hair and blood samples taken from Thomas would merely prove that the samples were taken from him and would not be exculpato ry. Id . art. 64.03.

1 Appellant

= s conviction was affirmed by this Court. Thomas v. State , No. 03

- 91

- 00058

- CR (Tex. App. C Austin Aug. 28, 1991, pet. ref = d, untimely filed) (not designated for publication).2 In his brief to this Court, Thomas asserts his innocence and complains of several violations of his rights at trial. The brief does not discuss the merits of his motion for DNA testing or the court = s order thereon other than to urge that the district court improperly placed the burden of proof on him. This complaint is without merit. Under the statute, the movant must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that a

reasonable probability exists that he would not have been prosecuted or convicted if exculpatory results had been obtained through DNA testing. Id . art. 64.03(a)(2)(A).

Having reviewed the record, we find no error in the court = s dismissal of the motion. Accordingly, the order is affirmed.

Mack Kidd, Justice Before Justices Kidd, Patterson and Puryear Affirmed Filed: August 30, 2002 Do Not Publish
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-1 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and
represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of
February 21, 2018, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-1 and Wilmington Trust, National Association (the Agreement)
during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By:

/s/ Sandra M. BroderickName:

Sandra M. BroderickTitle:

EVP Head of OperationsDate:

March 29, 2019By:

/s/ Andrew KangName:

Andrew KangTitle:

TreasurerDate:

March 29, 2019
Antonio L. SAULSBERRY, Petitioner v. Randy LEE, Warden.

No. 19-419

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 21, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of tds (Telemedine)
Inc. (the "Company"), certifies that:

          1.   The  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-QSB  of the  Company  for the
               Quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the  "Report")  fully  complies with
               the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
               Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

          2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.





Dated: August 14, 2007          /S/  DAVID WINSNESS
                                ----------------------------
                                     DAVID WINSNESS
                                     Chief Executive Officer


                                /S/  KEVIN KREISLER
                                ----------------------------
                                     KEVIN KREISLER
                                     Chief Financial Officer


This  certification  is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,
subject  to the  knowledge  standard  contained  therein,  and not for any other
purpose.
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

Eastern District of Texas Headwater Research LLC 2:23-cv-00398-JRG-RSP Headwater Research LLC 09/05/2023 /s/ Philip Wang Philip Wang CA Bar No. 262239

Russ August & Kabat 

12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90025 pwang@raklaw.com (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

Plaintiff

v.

AT&T Inc. et al

Case 2:23-cv-00398-JRG-RSP Document 14 Filed 09/05/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 201
Kalim A.R. MUHAMMAD, Petitioner v. AT&T, INC., et al.

No. 19-187

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alabama denied.
Todd Allen WHEELER, Petitioner v. MICHIGAN

No. 19-5545

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, John M. Sharpe, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the
Board of Directors and Treasurer of INNER SYSTEMS, INC. (the “Company”), DOES
HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.  The
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010
(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 12th
day of November, 2010.





/s/John M.
      Sharpe, Jr.John
      M. Sharpe, Jr.Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
INNER SYSTEMS, INC. and will be retained by INNER SYSTEMS, INC. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1458 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1458

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 18, 2014

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 1 Walter Hammond Place in Waldwick, New Jersey, as the ``Staff 
          Sergeant Joseph D'Augustine Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STAFF SERGEANT JOSEPH D'AUGUSTINE POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1 Walter Hammond Place in Waldwick, New Jersey, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Staff Sergeant Joseph D'Augustine Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Staff 
Sergeant Joseph D'Augustine Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 17, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Tawoine Aquil Frank BANKS, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5969

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 21, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Clifton D. HARVIN, Petitioner v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

No. 18-9540

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 16, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
Clifford L. LEE, II v. Alisha Blackmon LEE.

No. 8P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 1, 2004.

Clifford Leon Lee, II, Pro Se.

Alisha B. Lee, Pro Se.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th day of January 2004 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of April 2004."
Melinda SCOTT, Petitioner v. Joshua MOON, et al.

No. 19-5720

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of K.L.E.C., * From the 161st District

a child, Court of Ector County,

Trial Court No. B

- 3145

- PC

.

No. 11

- 13

- 00159

- CV * November 14, 2013

* Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson , J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion, the

judgment of the tria l court is in all things affirmed.
Virginia POWELL, Employee v. THE STANDARD PRODUCTS COMPANY, Employer and Twin City Fire Insurance Company, Carrier.

No. 230P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 24, 2004.

Virginia Powell, Pro Se.

J. Greer Vanderberry, Jr., Raleigh, for Standard Products & Twin City.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 13th day of May 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."
Danny HOWELL, Petitioner v. Duane SOUTHERLAND, et al.

No. 19-5898

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

The petition for rehearing is denied.
VIA EDGAR 
 
 
 
May 1, 1997 
 
 
Securities and Exchange Commission 
450 Fifth Street, N.W. 
Washington, D.C. 20549 
 
RE:	Smith Barney Intermediate Municipal Fund, Inc. 
	File Nos. 33-44639 
		   811-6506 
 
Dear Sirs: 
 
Pursuant to Rule 497(j) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, please 
accept this letter as certification that the Prospectus and the Statement of 
Additional Information for the above-referenced fund (the "Fund") does not 
differ from that contained in Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Fund's 
Registration Statement on Form N-2, which was filed electronically on April 
28, 1997.   
 
Please return an electronic transmittal as evidence of your receipt of this  
filing. 
 
Very truly yours, 
 
/s/ Daria J. Szczur 
 
Daria J. Szczur 
 
Enclosures 
 
cc:	(with enclosures) 
	John E. Baumgardner, Jr., Esq.		Stephen Brunt 
	Sullivan & Cromwell			Morgan Guaranty Trust Group 
 
	Robert P. Garrett				Michael McCarthy  
	KPMg Peat Marwick LLP 		The Shareholder Services Group Inc.