alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Independent Auditors' Consent



To the Shareholders and Directors of the
Smith Barney Natural Resources Fund (formerly, the Smith Barney
Precious Metals and Minerals Fund Inc.):

We consent to the use of our report dated December 28, 1995
incorporated herein by reference and to the references to our
Firm under the headings "Financial Highlights" in the
Prospectus and "Counsel and Auditors" in the Statement of
Additional Information.




                                        KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


New York, New York
January 5, 1996
Ellen FERNANDES v. Martin L. HERRING.

No. 600P03-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 24, 2004.

Martin L. Herring, Pro Se.

Elisabeth Clary, Knightdale, Melinda Wagoner Copes, for Fernandes.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 16th day of April 2004 in *45this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."
Julian D. OWENS, Petitioner v. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, et al.

No. 19M92

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Michael B. LOWRY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7035

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
exhibit103.htm

EXHIBIT 10.3  
 
 
 
 
	 
	- 1 -

	

	 


 
 
	 
	- 2 -

	

	 


 
 
	 
	- 3 -

	

	 


 
 
	 
	- 4 -

	

	 


 
 
	 
	- 5 -

	

	 


 
 
	 
	- 6 -

	

	 


 
 
	 
	- 7 -

	

	 


 
 
	 
	- 8 -

	

	 


 
 
	 
	- 9 -

	

	 


 
 
	 
	- 10 -

	

	 


 
 
	 
	- 11 -

	

	 


 
 
	 
	- 12 -

	

	 


 
 
	 
	- 13 -

	

	 


 
 
	 
	- 14 -

	

	 


 
 
	 
	- 15 -

	

	 


 
 
	 
	- 16 -

	

	 


 
 
	 
	- 17 -

	

	 


 
 
	 
	- 18 -

	

	 


 
 
	 
	- 19 -

	

	 


 
 
	 
	- 20 -

	

	 


 
 
 
FIRST AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
 
THIS AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into effective as of June 6, 2018 (the “Amendment Effective Date”) by and between Troika Media Group, Inc. f/k/a M2 nGage Group, Inc., a Nevada Corporation (the “Company”) and Michael S. Tenore (the “Executive” and, together with the Company, the “Parties”).
 
WHEREAS, the Company and Executive entered into that certain Executive Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of October 1, 2018; and
 
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Agreement in the manner reflected herein in consideration for Executive’s recent acquisition efforts for the Company and additional duties associated with corporate acquisitions; and
 
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants and conditions herein, the Parties intending to be legally bound hereby agree as follows, effective as of the Amendment Effective Date:
 
1.       Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby amended by changing the Initial Term end date to December 31, 2020. 
 
2.       Transaction Bonus: Should the Company close a corporate acquisition(s) (either of stock or assets) in excess of $10,000,000, the Company shall pay to Executive a per transaction bonus in the amount of $37,500.00 in consideration for Executive’s assistance in closing each such transaction (“Transaction Bonus”).  Such Transaction Bonus(es) shall be paid within sixty (60) days of the closing of such transaction(s).  
 
Counterparts. This amendment may be executed in one or more facsimile, electronic or original counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and both of which together shall constitute the same instrument.
 
Ratification. All terms and provisions of the Agreement not amended hereby, either expressly or by necessary implication, shall remain in full force and effect. From and after the date of this Amendment all references to the term “Agreement” in this Amendment or the original Agreement, as amended, shall include the terms contained in this Amendment.
 
[SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE]
 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment:
 
	Troika Media Group, Inc.
	 
	Michael S. Tenore

			 

	Name:
	 
	Name:

	Title:
	 
	Title:
Amendment to the Offer to F. Jacob Huff, M.D.



 EXHIBIT 10.34 
  
 Date: November 21, 2002 
  
 AMENDMENTS TO THE OFFER TO F.
JACOB HUFF, M.D. 
  
 1. The start date of employment
will be the next business day following the closing date of Renovis’ asset acquisition of Centaur Pharmaceuticals. 
  
 2. The $75,000 allocated for travel and relocation costs can include the reimbursement to Dr. Huff for lease payments for his clinical office in Laguna Hills. 

 
 Renovis, Inc. 
  

	 /s/ Corey Goodman

	  	 	  	 /s/ F. Jacob Huff


	 Corey Goodman, Ph.D.
 President and CEO
	  	 	  	 F. Jacob Huff, M.D.
10f-3 REPORT

SMITH BARNEY EQUITY FUNDS
SMITH BARNEY SOCIAL AWARENESS FUND

Noverber 1, 2002 through January 31,2003

	Trade					% of
Issuer	Date	Selling Dealer	Amount	Price	Issue (1)

Wellchoice   11/7/02   First Boston Inc.   $170,500   $25.000   0.30 A



(1)  Represents purchases by all affiliated funds; may not exceed
       25% of the principal amount of the offering.

A-Includes purchases of $1,079,500 by other Smith Barney Mutual Funds.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Baker, Elder and Fitzpatrick 

CARMEL GREEN HOUSES, INC. 

and 

FLORISTS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 1260-97-4 PER CURIAM 

 OCTOBER 14, 1997 

MOHAMMAD HAMMOUDEH 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Alan D. Sundburg; Friedlander, Misler, 

Friedlander, Sloan & Herz, on brief), for 

appellants. 

 (Lawrence J. Pascal; Ashcraft & Gerel, on 

brief), for appellee. 

 Carmel Green Houses, Inc. and its insurer (hereinafter 

referred to as employer) contend that the Workers' Compensation 

Commission (commission) erred in finding that Mohammad Hammoudeh 

(claimant) proved that he earned a post-injury average weekly 

wage of $250. Upon reviewing the record and the briefs of the 

parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. 

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's decision. Rule 

5A:27. 

 Beginning in 1994, claimant became self-employed buying and 

selling automobiles. Claimant testified that he earned 

approximately $200 to $250 per week. Claimant produced a profit 

and loss statement for the six-month period ending June 30, 1996. 

 Claimant's accountant generated the statement based upon 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 
 2 

claimant's business records. Employer did not introduce evidence 

to dispute claimant's testimony nor did employer request any 

discovery with respect to claimant's average weekly wage. 

 Based upon this record, the commission awarded claimant 

benefits based upon a $250 average weekly wage. 

 "It was the duty of the Commission to make the best possible 

estimate of . . . impairments of earnings from the evidence 

adduced at the hearing, and to determine the average weekly 

wage . . . ." Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc. v. Reeves, 1 Va. App. 

435, 441, 339 S.E.2d 570, 573 (1986). "This is a question of 

fact to be determined by the Commission which, if based on 

credible evidence, will not be disturbed on appeal." Id. "Thus, 

if credible evidence supports the commission's findings regarding 

the claimant's average weekly wage, we must uphold those 

findings." Chesapeake Bay Seafood House v. Clements, 14 Va. App. 

143, 146, 415 S.E.2d 864, 866 (1992). 

 Claimant's unrebutted testimony, which was corroborated by 

the profit and loss statement, constitutes credible evidence to 

support the commission's findings. Therefore, we must uphold 

those findings on appeal. Employer's contention that claimant 

failed to meet his burden of proof because he did not produce 

additional business records is without merit. Employer had every 

opportunity to offer evidence to rebut claimant's testimony, but 

failed to do so. 

 For these reasons, we affirm the commission's decision. 
 3 

 Affirmed.
|    |                                                                                                                                         |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Arlo Technologies, Inc. (the “Registrant”); and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
|   | /s/ MATTHEW MCRAE |
|   | Matthew McRae |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   | Arlo Technologies, Inc. |
Phillip E. SMITH, Petitioner, v. COLLINS, First Name Unknown, et al.

No. 19-6808

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 21, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Donald Brian WINBERG, et ux., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6883

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 121 (Friday, June 24, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 37855]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13515]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP22-985-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gulf Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Prepayments to be effective 8/
1/2022.
    Filed Date: 6/16/22.
    Accession Number: 20220616-5094.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 6/28/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-986-000.
    Applicants: Red Willow Offshore, LLC, Ridgewood Institutional IV 
Prospective Leases, LLC.
    Description: Joint Petition for Limited Waiver of Capacity Release 
Regulations, et al. of Red Willow Offshore, LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 6/17/22.
    Accession Number: 20220617-5067.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 6/29/22.

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP22-406-001.
    Applicants: ANR Pipeline Company.
    Description: Compliance filing: ANR Creditworthiness Compliance to 
be effective 6/10/2022.
    Filed Date: 6/17/22.
    Accession Number: 20220617-5071.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 6/29/22.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The number used to calculate the costs is 2.4444 and was 
rounded for the table.
    \8\ The number used to calculate the costs is 4.1026 and was 
rounded for the table.
    \9\ Data Collection for Analytics & Surveillance & Mkt.-Based 
Rate Purposes, 86 FR 17823 (Apr. 6, 2021), 174 FERC ] 61,214 (2021) 
(March Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: June 17, 2022.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-13515 Filed 6-23-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
STATE of North Carolina, ex rel. Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. v. Glenn Irvin HOCKNEY and wife Dorothy Elizabeth., Davis, Hockney.

No. 143P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 1, 2004.

Glenn Irvin Hockney, Pro Se.

Jim Gulick, Senior Deputy Attorney General, for State ex rel. Howes.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 25th day of March 2004 by Defendant in this matter for writ of certiorari-*Deed of Record v Eminent Domain Writ of Review to the North Carolina Supreme Court,* the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of April 2004."
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.2
TWENTY-FIFTH AMENDMENT 
OF 
JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 
SAVINGS AND INVESTMENT PLAN 
(As amended and restated, Effective as of January 1, 2012)
WHEREAS, John Bean Technologies Corporation (the “Company”) maintains the John Bean Technologies Corporation Savings and Investment Plan (the “Plan”);
WHEREAS, the Company now deems it necessary and desirable to amend the Plan in certain respects; and
WHEREAS, this Twenty-Fifth Amendment shall supersede the provisions of the Plan to the extent those provisions are inconsistent with the provisions of the amendment;
NOW, THEREFORE, by virtue of the authority reserved to the Company by Section 12.1 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective June 1, 2019: 
		
	1.
	A new Section 2.12 is hereby added to the Plan to read as follows:


		
	2.12
	Service Crediting for Proseal America, Inc.  Notwithstanding any provision herein to the contrary, effective June 1, 2019, if an individual (a) was actively employed by Proseal America, Inc. on May 31, 2019, and (b) remains an active employee of Proseal America, Inc. as of June 1, 2019, such individual’s period of employment with Proseal America, Inc. shall be counted under the Plan for purposes of (i) eligibility to participate in the Plan and (ii) determining the individual’s Years of Service under the Plan.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this amendment to be executed by a duly authorized representative this ___ day of ____________, 2019.


JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES 
CORPORATION


By:    /s/ Jason T. Clayton
Its:    EVP, Human Resources
Independent Auditors Consent



To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
Smith Barney Investment Trust:

We consent to the reference to our Firm in the Statement of Additional 
Information for the Smith Barney Mid Cap Blend Fund of the Smith Barney 
Investment Trust under the heading Counsel and Auditors.




	KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


New York, New York
June 26, 1998
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

,

Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 9, 2019

a1008 

# Order

Clerk October 9, 2019

160272

In re CHARLES W. MALETTE

_________________________________________ SC: 160272

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION,

Petitioner.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the petition for injunction pursuant to MCR 9.108(E)(4) is

considered, and it is GRANTED. We ORDER that Charles W. Malette (P68928) is

enjoined from practicing law in the State of Michigan until the felony charges pending

against him have concluded. If the respondent is acquitted of all felony charges, this

injunction shall automa tically dissolve.

C AVANAGH , J., did not participate due to her prior service as a member of the

Attorney Grievance Commission.
IMES v. ASHEVILLE.

No. 250A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 27, 2004.

Fred T. Hamlet, Greensboro, for CCL Mgt. and Asheville City Coach.

Curtis W. Euler, Asheville, for City of Asheville.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th day of May 2004 by Plaintiff Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief:

> 
*385
"Motion Allowed. Plaintiff (James Edward Imes) shall have up to and including the 20th day of August 2004 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 27th day of May 2004."
O & M INDUSTRIES v. SMITH ENGINEERING CO.

COA03-432.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 3, 2004.

Certification Date August 23, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed.
Lawrence I. FEJOKWU, Petitioner, v. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION.

No. 19-132

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
#### Brown Estate.

Argued October 5, 1955.

Before Stern, C. J., Stearns, Jones, Musmanno and Arnold, JJ.

*Vincent E. Williams*and *Robert H.*Rial, with them *Smith, Best & Horn,*and *Walls, Rial & Morrell,*for appellant.

*100*Edward B. Doran,*for appellees.

January 13, 1956:

Opinion

Pee Curiam,

The decree is affirmed on the opinion of President Judge Copeland at 4 D. & C. 2d 722, costs to be borne by the estate.
STATE of North Carolina v. Riley MASON, Jr.

No. 210P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 24, 2004.

David Childers, Mount Holly, for Riley Mason, Jr.

Kristine L. Lanning, Assistant Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th day of May 2004 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1387 

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to exempt certain perishable 

agricultural commodities from the goods whose sale or distribution in 

commerce may be prohibited subsequent to a violation of such Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 21, 2013 

Mr. SCHRADER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to exempt 

certain perishable agricultural commodities from the 

goods whose sale or distribution in commerce may be 

prohibited subsequent to a violation of such Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION OF PERISHABLE AGRICULTURAL 

4 COMMODITIES. 

5 Section 15(a)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 

6 1938 (29 U.S.C. 215(a)(1)) is amended by inserting 

7 ‘‘(other than perishable agricultural commodities, as such 

8 term is defined in section 1(b)(4) of the Perishable AgriVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:24 Mar 26, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1387.IH H1387

pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1387 IH

1 cultural Commodities Act, 1930 (7 U.S.C. 499a(b)(4))’’ 

2 after ‘‘any goods’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         The undersigned, John M. Sharpe, Jr., hereby certifies as follows:

         1. I am the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of
Inner Systems, Inc. (the "Company").

         2. To the best of my knowledge, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the "Report") complies in all
material respects with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

         3. To the best of my knowledge based upon a review of the Report, the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period
audited.


      SIGNATURE                         TITLE                      DATE


/s/ John M. Sharpe, Jr.      President, Chief Executive       November 13, 2009
-----------------------      Officer and Chief Financial
JOHN M. SHARPE, JR.          Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to INNER SYSTEMS, INC. and will be retained by INNER SYSTEMS, INC. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Matthew Paul BOROWSKI, Petitioner v. Kimberly BECHELLI, et al.

No. 19-6635

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 16, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.