alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________

No. 95-10658

(Summary Calendar)

_________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SAM MERIT,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Texas

(3:87-CR-153-T)

March 7, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Sam Merit appeals the district court’s denial of a successive

Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the appeal and find

it without arguable merit. Accordingly, Merit’s appeal is

DISMISSED as frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th

Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Merit previously has been warned by this court that he may be

sanctioned for any frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf.

Additionally, Merit has continued to abuse the courts by the

successive filing of postjudgment motions and appeals of the

denials of those motions. Accordingly, Merit is barred from
-2-

filing, or having anyone file on his behalf, any pro se, in forma

pauperis, civil appeal in this court, or any pro se, in forma

pauperis, initial civil pleading or motion in any court which is

subject to this court’s jurisdiction, without the advance written

permission of a judge of the forum court or of this court; the

clerk of this court and the clerks of all federal district courts

in this Circuit are directed to return to Merit, unfiled, any

attempted submission inconsistent with this bar.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Government’s motion to dismiss

Merit’s appeal is DENIED as unnecessary, and Merit’s application

for release pending appeal and Joyce E. Merit’s motion to file an

amicus curiae brief are also DENIED.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SANCTION IMPOSED.
**BERNARD FINANCIAL SERVICINGGROUP**

20700 Civic Center Drive 

Suite 240

Southfield, Michigan 48076

 

Tel: (248) 799-9200

Fax: (248) 799-9208

 

 

MANAGEMENT'S ASSERTATION ON COMPLIANCE

WITH REGULATION AB CRITERIA

 

 

Bernard Financial Corporation(the "Asserting Party") is responsible for assessing compliance as ofDecember 31, 2023, and the year ended with the following servicing criteria setforth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's RegulationAB: 1122 (d) (1) (i), 1122 (d) (1) (ii), 1122 (d) (1) (iv), 1122 (d) (1) (v),1122 (d) (2) (i), 1122 (d) (2) (ii), 1122 (d) (2) (iii), 1122 (d) (2) (iv),1122 (d) (2) (v), 1122 (d) (2) (vi), 1122 (d) (2) (vii), 1122 (d) (4) (i), 1122(d) (4) (ii), 1122 (d) (4) (iii), 1122 (d) (4) (iv), 1122 (d) (4) (v), 1122 (d)(4) (vi), 1122 (d) (4) (viii), 1122 (d) (4) (ix), 1122 (d) (4) (x), 1122 (d)(4) (xi), 1122 (d) (4) (xii), 1122 (d) (4) (xiii) and 1122 (d) (4) (xiv). Theseservicing criteria apply to public asset­ backed issuances commencing afterDecember 31, 2005.

 

The Assorting Party hasassessed its compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for thereporting period and has not identified any instances of materialnoncompliance. The Asserting Party has concluded that they have complied, inall material respects, with the applicable servicing criteria as outlined abovefor those asset-backed securitization transactions serviced by the AssertingParty.

 

Tramer& Bolbach Inc, anindependent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation reporton the assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for thereporting period set forth in this assertion.

 

 

/s/ Dennis S. Bernard

Dennis S. Bernard 

President

Bernard Financial Corporation

 

 

February 9, 2024

 

 

**Real Estate Finance andInvestment Brokers**

 

 

(logo) MBA MEMBER
SCHEDULE 2

                                         10f-3 REPORT

                                   SMITH BARNEY MUNI FUNDS
                                    LIMITED TERM PORTFOLIO

                            February 1, 2002 through April 30, 2002

			Trade						% of
Issuer			Date	Selling Dealer	Amount	    Price     Issue (1)
Massachusetts Health 	4/5/02	Merrill Lynch	$1,300,000  $103.371  18.29%A
   & Education Finance
   Authority Massachusetts
   Project
   5.500% due 10/1/2018


(1) Represents purchases by all affiliated funds; may not exceed
    25% of the principalamount of the offering.


A - Includes purchases of $11,500,000 by other Smith Barney Mutual Funds.








SCHEDULE 1

					10f-3 REPORT

				   SMITH BARNEY MUNI FUNDS
				    NEW YORK PORTFOLIO

                             February 1, 2002 through April 30, 2002

			Trade						 % of
Issuer			Date   Selling Dealer  	Amount	 Price   Issue (1)
South Broward Hospital	2/12/02Prudential Securities	$500,000 $99.630 0.42%
   5.625% due 5/1/2032



(1)Represents purchases by all affiliated funds; may not exceed
   25% of the principalamount of the offering.
United Technologies Corporation Employee Scholar Program


 Exhibit 10.14 
  
 UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 
  
 EMPLOYEE SCHOLAR PROGRAM 
  
 United Technologies Corporation (“UTC”), through its Employee Scholar Program (the “Program”), encourages eligible employees to develop additional
skills and engage in studies at accredited colleges and universities. Under the Program, UTC pays for covered tuition and textbook expenses for participating employees and provides certain awards of UTC Common Stock, options and stock units upon
completion of associate’s, bachelor’s, master’s, doctorate and equivalent degrees. 
  
 Active employees of UTC and its participating affiliated companies in the United States and other countries are eligible to participate. Extended benefits are provided to certain employees whose positions are
eliminated due to restructuring or layoff. 
  
 In recognition of the
accomplishments of eligible employees who are awarded degrees from accredited educational institutions while participating in the program, shares of UTC Common Stock, stock options or stock units are awarded. US.-based employees who satisfy Program
requirements will be awarded a number of shares of UTC Common Stock valued at $5,000 for those completing an associate’s degree and $10,000 for those completing a bachelor’s, master’s or doctorate degree. Alternatively, participants
may elect to receive 250 UTC Common Stock options for those completing an associate’s degree, or 500 UTC Common Stock options for those completing a bachelor’s, master’s or doctorate degree. Employees based outside the U.S. who
satisfy Program requirements will be awarded a number of shares of UTC Common Stock valued at 9% of the average UTC salary in that country for participants completing the equivalent of an associate’s degree and 18% of the average salary in that
country for participants completing the equivalent of a bachelor’s, master’s, or doctorate degree. The number of shares awarded in each case is determined using the closing price of UTC Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange
(“NYSE”) on the first trading day of the month following submission of a qualifying award request. 
  
 A maximum of 400,000 shares of UTC Common Stock (including share equivalents) may be awarded annually under the Program, subject to an aggregate limitation of 4,000,000 shares (including share equivalents) during the
period from January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2012. UTC reserves the right to suspend, terminate or modify the terms of the Program at any time. This summary of the Program is qualified in its entirety by reference to UTC’s detailed policies
and procedures implementing the Program, as amended from time to time. The sole purpose of the Program is to facilitate and encourage educational development and achievement and it is not intended to and shall not be construed to constitute an
employee benefit plan or compensatory arrangement.
STATE v. Larry Spencer HILL.

No. 249P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 24, 2004.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 25th day of May 2004 by Defendant for Immediate Release:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 24th day of June 2004."
DODSON v. DUBOSE STEEL and Am. Man.

No. 405A03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2004.

Maura K. Gavigan, Erin E. Eveson, for Dubose Steel, Inc. and American Manufacturers Mutual.

Dale P. Johnson, Clinton, for Dodson.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th day of December 2003 by Plaintiff to Dismiss the Appeal of One of the Two Named Defendants:

> "Motion Dismissed as Moot by order of the Court in conference this the 5th day of February 2004."
Clifford L. RUSH, Petitioner v. NEBRASKA

No. 19-6406

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nebraska denied.
Anthony Q. KELLY, Petitioner v. Frank B. BISHOP, Jr., Warden, et al.

No. 19-6075

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Loretta J. ALFORD, Petitioner v. Tina BALLARD, et al.

No. 18-9667

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
TRAVELERS SERIES FUND INC.
on behalf of the 
Smith Barney Large Cap Value Portfolio 
Supplement dated May 19, 1998 to 
Prospectus dated February 27, 1998


The following revises and supersedes, as applicable, the 
discussion under "Management" with respect to the Smith Barney 
Large Cap Value Portfolio:

Ellen Cardozo Sonsino has been named Portfolio Manager of the 
Smith Barney Large Cap Value Portfolio.  Ms. Sonsino is a 
Managing Director and a Senior Equity Portfolio Manager of Smith 
Barney Inc. ("Smith Barney").  She joined Smith Barney 1984.  
Previously, she was a Vice President/Senior Investment Analyst 
and Portfolio Manager for three years at ABD Securities 
Corporation and a Vice President and Senior Investment Analyst 
for three years at Lionel D. Edie. 















FD 01460
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, CoreyHenry, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-1 (the“Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. Based onmy knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement inall material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included inthis report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: WilmingtonTrust, National Association. 

 
By: /s/ Corey HenryName: Corey HenryTitle: President and Chief Executive Officer Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)Date: March 31, 2022**
Tracy L. STEWART, et al., Petitioners v. WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY

No. 19-629

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 21, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh Office denied.
# Official Journal C 366A/30 O

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 366A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6330 October 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 366A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6330 October 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | Corrigenda |
| 2020/C 366 A/01 | Corrigendum to Notice of vacancy CONS/AD/162/20 ( OJ C 358 A, 26.10.2020 ) | 1 |

Contents

page

Corrigenda

2020/C 366 A/01

Corrigendum to Notice of vacancy CONS/AD/162/20 ( OJ C 358 A, 26.10.2020 )

( OJ C 358 A, 26.10.2020 )

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

Corrigenda

| 30.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 366/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 366/1

---

Corrigendum to Notice of vacancy CONS/AD/162/20

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 358 A of 26 October 2020
  )

(2020/C 366 A/01)

On page 1, under ‘GENERAL INFORMATION’, ‘Department’:

| for: | ‘DG RELEX: Foreign Affairs, Enlargement and Civil Protection’, |
| --- | --- |

for:

‘DG RELEX: Foreign Affairs, Enlargement and Civil Protection’,

| read: | ‘DG RELEX: External Relations’. |
| --- | --- |

read:

read:

‘DG RELEX: External Relations’.

On page 1, under ‘We are’, second paragraph:

| for: | ‘Directorate-General “Foreign Affairs, Enlargement and Civil Protection” (DG RELEX) currently comprises 2 directorates: RELEX.1 dealing with Trade, Development, Security and Coordination, and RELEX.2, dealing with Enlargement, Middle East and North Africa, Civil Protection.’, |
| --- | --- |

for:

for:

‘Directorate-General “Foreign Affairs, Enlargement and Civil Protection” (DG RELEX) currently comprises 2 directorates: RELEX.1 dealing with Trade, Development, Security and Coordination, and RELEX.2, dealing with Enlargement, Middle East and North Africa, Civil Protection.’,

| read: | ‘Directorate-General “External Relations” (DG RELEX) currently comprises 2 directorates: RELEX.1 dealing with Trade, Development and Security, and RELEX.2, dealing with Neighbourhood Policy and Crisis Response.’. |
| --- | --- |

read:

read:

‘Directorate-General “External Relations” (DG RELEX) currently comprises 2 directorates: RELEX.1 dealing with Trade, Development and Security, and RELEX.2, dealing with Neighbourhood Policy and Crisis Response.’.

---
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-08-327-CR

JOHN MCGEE	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM THE 362ND DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Pursuant to a plea bargain, the trial court convicted Appellant John McGee upon his plea of guilty to the offense of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle and sentenced him to 345 days’ confinement in the State Jail Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.  Appellant did not file a motion for new trial, but he filed his notice of appeal more than two months after sentence was imposed; thus, his notice of appeal was untimely.2  Additionally, the trial court’s certification states that this is a plea-bargain case, that Appellant has no right to appeal, and that he has waived the right of appeal.3

	Accordingly, we informed Appellant’s appointed counsel by letter on September 19, 2008 that this appeal was subject to dismissal unless Appellant or any party showed grounds for continuing it on or before September 29, 2008.  Appellant’s counsel did not respond, and Appellant’s pro se response admits that his attorney filed the notice of appeal late.

	A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements of rule 26 is essential to vest this court with jurisdiction.4  The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has expressly held that, without a timely filed notice of appeal or motion for extension of time, we cannot exercise jurisdiction over an appeal.5 

	Because Appellant’s notice of appeal was untimely filed, we dismiss this case for want of jurisdiction.6

								PER CURIAM

PANEL:  DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED:  November 20, 2008
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 21, 2014

No. 04-11-00156-CR

Juan E. GUERRA,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009CR13014

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

The Appellant’s Motion to Rescind Orders is hereby DENIED.

It is so ORDERED on the 21st day of July, 2014.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ____________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Superior Essex Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended September 30, 2004 (the "Periodic Report"), I, David S.
Aldridge, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge and belief, that the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: May 9, 2005 |  | /s/DAVID S. ALDRIDGEDavid S. Aldridge Chief Financial
Officer
|----------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with this amended Quarterly Report of Effective Profitable Software, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Don Bratcher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| 1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| 2. | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Effective Profitable Software, Inc. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Dated: September 28, 2006

 

*/s/ Don Bratcher*

Don Bratcher

Chief Financial Officer
August 18, 2000

VIA ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION

Securities and Exchange Commission
File Desk
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

Re:	Smith Barney Investment Trust (the "Trust")
	On behalf of the Mid Cap Core Fund )(formerly
Mid Cap Blend Fund)(the "Fund")
File Nos. 33-43446; 811-06444

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Rule 497 (j) under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, please accept this letter as
certification that (a)the Fund's prospectus, dated
March 29, 2000, as amended August 21, 2000, (b) the
statement of additional information, also dated March
29, 2000, as amended August 21, 2000, for the above
referenced Fund does not differ from that contained
in Post-Effective Amendment No. 30 filed on August
16, 2000.

Please return an electronic transmittal as evidence
of your receipt of this filing.

Any questions regarding this filing should be directed to
the undersigned at (212) 816-5770.

Sincerely,

/s/ Michael Kocur

Michael Kocur
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
the Smith Barney Adjustable Rate Government Income Fund:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements 
of the Smith Barney Adjustable Rate Government Income Fund (the 
"Fund") for the year ended May 31, 1998, we considered its 
internal control, including control activities for safeguarding 
securities, in order to determine our auditing procedures for the 
purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and 
to comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide 
assurance on the internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and 
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility, 
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the 
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally, 
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's 
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes 
that are fairly presented in conformity with generally accepted 
accounting principles. Those controls include the safeguarding of 
assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition. 

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or 
irregularities may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection 
of any evaluation of internal control to future periods is 
subject to the risk that it may become inadequate because of 
changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and 
operation may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily 
disclose all matters in the internal control that might be 
material weaknesses under standards established by the American 
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness 
is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of 
the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively 
low level the risk that errors or irregularities in amounts that 
would be material in relation to the financial statements being 
audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by 
employees in the normal course of performing their assigned 
functions.  However, we noted no matters involving the internal 
control and its operation, including controls for safeguarding 
securities that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined 
above. 

This report is intended solely for the information and use of 
management, the Board of Directors of the Fund, and the 
Securities and Exchange Commission.



July 15, 1998
Jerome SMALL, Petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 19-6612

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office denied.