alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION 

ANTHONY NORMAN MORRIS, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

MAXEY CERLIANO, 

 Defendant. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Case No. 6:23-cv-534-JDK-KNM 

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Plaintiff Anthony Morris, a former inmate in Gregg County Jail proceeding pro 

se, filed this civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred 

to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell for findings of fact, conclusions 

of law, and recommendations for disposition. 

On October 28, 2024, Judge Mitchell issued a Report recommending that the 

Court dismiss the lawsuit without prejudice for failure to prosecute or to obey an 

order of the Court. Docket No. 11. A copy of this Report was sent to Plaintiff’s last 

known mailing address, but it was returned as undeliverable. Docket No. 12. No 

objections have been received. To date, Plaintiff has not advised the Court of his 

current mailing address. See Loc. R. CV-11(d) (“A pro se litigant . . . is responsible for 

keeping the clerk advised in writing of his or her current physical address.”); Docket 

No. 7 at 5 (Plaintiff’s amended complaint including a declaration stating that Plaintiff 

has the responsibility to keep the Court informed of his current mailing address). 

Case 6:23-cv-00534-JDK-KNM Document 13 Filed 11/26/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:

48
2 

This Court reviews the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge de 

novo only if a party objects within fourteen days of service of the Report and 

Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In conducting a de novo review, the Court 

examines the entire record and makes an independent assessment under the law. 

Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), 

superseded on other grounds by statute, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (extending the time to 

file objections from ten to fourteen days). 

Here, Plaintiff did not object in the prescribed period. The Court therefore 

reviews the Magistrate Judge’s findings for clear error or abuse of discretion and 

reviews the legal conclusions to determine whether they are contrary to law. See 

United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989) (holding that, if no 

objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Report are filed, the standard of review is “clearly 

erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law”). 

Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and the record in this case, 

the Court finds no clear error or abuse of discretion and no conclusions contrary to 

law. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the 

United States Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 11) as the findings of this Court. It is 

therefore ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to 

prosecute or to obey an order of the Court. 

So ORDERED and SIGNED this day of

___________________________________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 26th November, 2024.

Case 6:23-cv-00534-JDK-KNM Document 13 Filed 11/26/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:

49
Afries Sandonicaes MAHAM, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6904

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 21, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Steven HICKS, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6769

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor, with whom Justice Ginsburg joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari:

*985I dissent for the reasons set out in *Brown* v. *United States,* 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 14, 202 L.Ed.2d 302 (2018) (Sotomayor, J., dissenting).
CERTIFICATE
                              
      The  undersigned, Controller of  SMITH BARNEY
FUNDAMENTAL VALUE FUND INC. (the "Fund"), hereby certifies
that the Fund has received  full payment, in  accordance
with  the provisions of its Prospectus, for 47,418,930
shares of common stock,  par  value $0.001 per share, the
sales  of  which are reported in the Fund's Rule 24f-2
Notice covering the fiscal year ended  September 30, 1996
and that the facts otherwise stated in such Notice are true.


                                   Thomas M. Reynolds
                                   Controller

Dated:        November 8, 1996
# Official Journal C 211A/30 A

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 211A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4830 August 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 211A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4830 August 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Notices |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 211A/1 | Publication of a notice of vacancy for Executive Director of the European Food Safety Authority — (Grade A*15) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2005/10007 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Notices

Commission

2005/C 211A/1

Publication of a notice of vacancy for Executive Director of the European Food Safety Authority — (Grade A*15) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2005/10007

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

III Notices

Commission

| 30.8.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 211/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 211/1

---

Publication of a notice of vacancy for

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

of the European Food Safety Authority

(Grade A*15)

(Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations)

COM/2005/10007

(2005/C 211 A/01)

The European Food Safety Authority is seeking to appoint its Executive Director.

Applicants must be a citizen of one of the Member States of the European Union.

The Executive Director will be appointed by the Management Board of the Authority from a list of candidates selected and proposed by the European Commission. Salaries and conditions of employment are those laid down in the Staff Regulations for A*15 grade officials of the Communities. The Authority and the Commission apply an equal opportunities policy.

Job description, application forms and instructions for sending applications can be downloaded from the Internet at the following address:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

or

http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/efsa/index_en.htm

The delay for the receipt of applications is 5 October 2005 (see details in application instructions).

---
IN RE E. Edward ZIMMERMANN, Petitioner

No. 18-9582

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

The petition for rehearing is denied.
Exhibit








Amendment to Executive Change of Control Agreement


WHEREAS, Andrew Bonzani (the “Executive”) and The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. (“Interpublic,” Interpublic and its subsidiaries being referred to herein as the “Company”) are parties to an Executive Change of Control Agreement dated as of May 27, 2010, as amended (the “Agreement”); 


WHEREAS, Section 5.1 of the Agreement states that the Agreement will expire as of September 1, 2019; 


WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company wish to extend the Agreement for another three years and to make certain updates and clarifications; and


NOW, THEREFORE, the Agreement is hereby amended, effective immediately, as follows:


		
	1.
	Incorporation by Reference. All provisions of the Agreement are hereby incorporated herein by reference and shall remain in full force and effect except to the extent that such provisions are expressly modified by the provisions of this Amendment. Words and phrases used in this Amendment shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement unless the context clearly indicates that a different meaning is intended.




		
	2.
	Severance Payment.  Section 2.1(b) of the Agreement is amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows:




(b)  The greater of (i) the Executive’s actual annual incentive award under the Interpublic Senior Executive Incentive Plan or any successor thereto (“SEIP Award”) for the calendar year in which the Qualifying Termination occurs or (ii) the Executive’s target SEIP Award for the calendar year in which the Change of Control occurs, as such target SEIP Award is in effect immediately prior to such Change of Control, subject to the adjustment, if any, required by the SEIP if Executive has already received a full SEIP Award for the calendar year of the Qualifying Termination.


		
	3.
	Extension. Section 5.1(a)(i) of the Agreement is amended by replacing “September 1, 2019” with “September 30, 2022”.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Interpublic, by its duly authorized officer, and Executive have caused this Amendment to the Agreement to be executed.




	
		
	The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.
	Executive

	 
	 

	By: /s/ Philippe Krakowsky
	By: /s/ Andrew Bonzani

	Philippe Krakowsky
	Andrew Bonzani

	EVP, Chief Strategy & Talent Officer
	 

	Date: July 24, 2019
	Date: July 24, 2019
Donnie BERRY, Petitioner, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 19-6669

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Blueprint


Exhibit
10.4

 



List of Holders

 





	

Purchaser

	
 

	

Subscription
Amount


	

Gem
Partners

	
 

	

$500,000


	

Stephen
Hanson

	
 

	

$100,000


	

Mark
Fisher

	
 

	

$100,000
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-40062

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN FRANCISCO GUERRERO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:10-CR-247-1

Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Francisco

Guerrero has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Guerrero has not filed a response. We have reviewed

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue

for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 21, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-40062 Document: 00511640954 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2011
No. 11-40062

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 11-40062 Document: 00511640954 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/21/2011
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Synopsis"
and "Representations and Warranties" and to the use of our report
dated December 15, 1999, with respect to Mid Cap Fund, a series of
Concert Investment Series, which is incorporated by reference, in
this Registration Statement on Form N-14 of Smith Barney Investment
Trust.



/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

ERNST & YOUNG LLP


New York, New York
July 14, 2000
Noris BABB, Petitioner, v. Robert WILKIE, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

No. 18-882.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Jan. 17, 2020.

The parties are directed to file supplemental letter briefs addressing the following question: What prospective administrative or judicial relief may a federal employee obtain under laws other than the ADEA, including under the civil service laws or the Constitution, against age-related policies, practices, actions, or statements that were not the but-for cause of an adverse employment action against the complaining employee? The briefs, not to exceed 10 pages, is to be filed simultaneously with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 2 p.m., Thursday, January 23, 2020.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1048 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1048

         To suspend temporarily the duty on Disperse Orange 73.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2013

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on Disperse Orange 73.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISPERSE ORANGE 73.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Disperse Orange 73  Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          (CAS No. 40690-89-                                                12/31/2016
                          9) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          3204.11.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Derran SMILEY, Petitioner v. CALIFORNIA

No. 19-6407

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District denied.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CertificatePursuant to Rule 15d-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**

I, Paul Block,certify that:

1. I have reviewedthis quarterly report of Merisant Company (the “registrant”);

2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

# 3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

# 4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

# (a)                                  Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

# (b)                                 Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

# (c)                                  Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

# 5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

# (a)                                  Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

# (b)                                 Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date:  May 12, 2006
|        | /s/ Paul Block            |
|--------|--------------------------------|
|   | Name: Paul Block               |
|   | Title: Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 10.2

The following officers have entered into the Form Indemnification Agreement
filed by the Company with its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2003, as of the date indicated below:




               OFFICER                   DATED EXECUTED
               ------------------------  ------------------
               Jack Bryant              10/6/03
               Steve Norton             10/10/03
               Steve Necessary          10/7/03
               Kirk Somers              10/13/03





<PAGE>
** **

**Exhibit 31.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Christopher Coffey, Vice President of Synchrony Card Funding LLC,certify that:

 

1.            Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered bythis report on Form 10-K of Synchrony Card Issuance Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.            Basedon my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.            Basedon my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.            Basedon my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosedin the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects;and

 

5.            Allof the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance withItem 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied oninformation provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware, Citibank, N.A. and Citicorp Trust Delaware,National Association.

 

 

 

 

March 29, 2024
Bruce Duane WALTON, Petitioner v. Tracy RAY, Warden.

No. 18-9374

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# C_2018459EN.01003702.xml

| 20.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 459/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 459/37

---

Special Report No 35/2018

Transparency of EU funds implemented by NGOs: more effort needed

(2018/C 459/13)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 35/2018 ‘Transparency of EU funds implemented by NGOs: more effort needed’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://eca.europa.eu

---
# C_2017093EN.01000101.xml

| 24.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/1

---

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

2013-2014 SESSION

Sittings of 3 to 6 February 2014

The Minutes of this session have been published in

  OJ C 30, 29.1.2015
  .

The Minutes of this session have been published in

OJ C 30, 29.1.2015

TEXTS ADOPTED

---
# Official Journal C 115/11 A

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 115 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6011 April 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 115

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6011 April 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2017/C 115/01 | Annual Report on the Implementation of the EU Strategy to Combat the Illicit Accumulation and Trafficking of Small Arms and Light Weapons and their Ammunition — Actions in 2015 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2017/C 115/01

Annual Report on the Implementation of the EU Strategy to Combat the Illicit Accumulation and Trafficking of Small Arms and Light Weapons and their Ammunition — Actions in 2015

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BCTC V Assignor Corp. (the "registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|                |  |                            
|--------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:           |  |                            
|August 12, 2005 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|                |  |                            
|                |  | Marc N. Teal               
|                |  | Principal Financial Officer
|                |  |                            
|                |  |                            

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.