alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00125

- CR

B OBBY C ARL V ONCK

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ O n Appeal from the 43rd District Court

of Parker County ( CR16

- 0667 )

October 15, 2020

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s ju dgment. It is ordered that the trial court ’ s judgment

is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _ /s/ Elizabeth Kerr

__________________ Justice Elizabeth Kerr
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 19, 2016

jam

Order 

Clerk

April 19, 2016

153300

DEMAREO JAMINE ALLEN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 153300

COA: 330153

KINROSS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY 

WARDEN,

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff-appellant having failed to pay the 

partial filing fee as required by the order of March 28, 2016, the Clerk of the Court is 

hereby directed to close this file.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report dated February 22, 2001, included in this Form 10-K into
Crescent Real Estate Equities Company's previously filed Registration Statements
File No. 33-91438, No. 33-92548, No. 333-03450, No. 333-03452, No. 333-03454,
No. 333-13521, No. 333-21905, No. 333-23005, No. 333-33893, No. 333-37273, No.
333-37553, No. 333-37565, No. 333-38071, No. 33-41049, No. 333-42417, No.
333-47563, No. 333-57863, No. 333-64377, No. 333-64379, and No. 333-77941.

                                                       ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 30, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000797480
<NAME> SMITH BARNEY NATURAL RESOURCES FUND INC. CLASS L

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                       50,820,810
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                      49,539,061
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,591
<ASSETS-OTHER>                               3,449,536
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              52,993,188
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                             0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                    5,006,035
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                          5,006,035
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                      0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                    64,580,814
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                          163,845
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                          193,162
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                        4,896
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                   (15,316,808)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                   (1,281,749)
<NET-ASSETS>                                47,987,153
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                            1,019,338
<INTEREST-INCOME>                              125,463
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                               1,125,896
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                         18,905
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                     (318,093)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                    7,443,234
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                        7,144,046
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                            0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                        119,290
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                    148,607
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                                  0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                    (11,564,883)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                        (6,373)
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                 (16,006,078)
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                          400,065
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                              1,125,896
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                         3,068,844
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                            16.03
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                  (0.02)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                          02.19
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                            0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                              18.20
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                  02.33



</TABLE>
James WALKER, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-373

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

It appearing that petitioner died on January 22, 2020, the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.
SMITH BARNEY INVESTMENT FUNDS INC.
10f-3 REPORT
December 1, 1997 through May 31, 1998



												% of
				Trade						Purchase	% of
Issuer				Date	Selling Dealer			Shares
	Price		Issue

Aqua Penn			1/29/98	Paine Webber			 60,000
	$13.00		1.46%

Keebler Foods Co.		1/29/98	CS First Boston			51,000	  
24.00		0.66

Advanced Communications	2/12/98	Paine Webber			150,000	  
14.00		1.88

Duane Read Inc.			2/29/98	Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette	3,600	  
16.50		0.54

PC Connection Inc.		3/3/98	Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette	20,000
	  17.50		0.64

Bright Star			4/17/98	Oppenheimer & Co.		100	  13.00	
	2.67

Caliber Learning 			5/6/98	BT Alex Brown			12,500
	  14.00		2.31

Cavanaugh Hospitality Corp.	4/3/98	CIBC Oppenheimer		6,000	  15.00
		0.96

Charles	River Associates		4/23/98	Montgomery Securities	
	1,380	  18.50		0.69

Columbia Sportswear Co.		3/26/98	Goldman Sachs			2,250	  
18.00		0.44

DSET				3/12/98	BT Alex Brown			2,800	  16.00
		0.67

Happy Kids			4/3/98	Ladenberg Thalmann & Co.	50,000	  
10.00		2.27

ISS Group			3/23/98	Goldman Sachs			1,017	  22.00
		0.37

PC Connection Inc.		3/3/98	DLJ				20,000	  
17.50		0.64

Provant				4/28/98	Montgomery Securities		2,200	  
13.00		0.77

Reltec				3/12/98	Morgan Stanley			1,800	  
29.00		0.36

Ultralite				4/30/98	Lehman Brothers			75,000
	  12.50		3.00

United Road Services		5/1/98	DLJ				25,000	  
13.00		0.45
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alesco Financial Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, James J. McEntee, III and John J. Longino, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and result of operations of the Company.

Date: August 6, 2008



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ James J. McEntee, III            
|James J. McEntee, III                
|Chief Executive Officer and President
|                                     
|/s/ John J. Longino                  
|John J. Longino                      
|Chief Financial Officer              



53
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, Petitioner, v. Manuel DE JESUS ORTEGA MELENDRES, et al.

No. 18-735

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
John Lee NORRIS, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6240

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 12, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended October 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                          <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000             JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999             OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                         645,928                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,501,765                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    851,968                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,220,808                       0
<PP&E>                                       1,801,231                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,441,903                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,498,016                       0
<BONDS>                                        387,937                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     4,850,970                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,704,980                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,441,903                       0
<SALES>                                      7,018,027               2,804,751
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,018,027               2,804,751
<CGS>                                        4,813,208               1,971,964
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  539,959                 219,530
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               915,520                 305,045
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                749,340                 308,212
<INCOME-TAX>                                   269,121                 112,270
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            572,743                 288,466
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   572,743                 288,466
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0







</TABLE>
SMITH BARNEY OREGON MUNICIPALS FUND
                          10f-3 REPORT
              March 1, 1997 through August 31, 1997


                                                  % of
                    Trade                   Par
Purchase       Fund % of
Issuer                   Date Selling Dealer Amount         Price
Assets    Issue

Puerto Rico G.O.              3/31/97   Lehman Brothers
$700,000       $93.725        2.74%     0.71%
5.375% due 7/1/2025

Oregon Dept. of Admin.        4/17/97   Bear Stearns      500,000
97.995         2.01 1.29
5.80% due 5/1/2024

Puerto Rico Elec. Power Auth. 5/9/97    Bear Stearns      500,000
95.616         1.89 0.35
5.68% due 7/1/2027

Puerto Rico Pub. Bldgs.       6/13/97   Morgan Stanley    500,000
92.691         1.76 1.70
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018329EN.01000601.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 18.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/6 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9073 — PAI Partners/Asmodee)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 329/05)

1.

On 11 September 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018329EN.01000601-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | PAI Partners SAS (‘PAI Partners’, France), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Group Asmodee (‘Asmodee’, France). |

PAI Partners acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Asmodee.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for PAI Partners: private equity company that manages and/or advises a number of funds that own companies active in a variety of business sectors, such as business services, food and consumer goods, general industries, healthcare, and retail and distribution,

—   for Asmodee: publishing and distribution of games (board games, card games and their digital versions), and in the licensing of these games.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018329EN.01000601-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9073 — PAI Partners/Asmodee

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| E-mail: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018329EN.01000601-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018329EN.01000601-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
Kenneth TRAYLOR, Petitioner, v. MISSISSIPPI.

No. 19-5239.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Mississippi denied.
The Board of Directors of the
Smith Barney World Funds, Inc.:

In planning and performing our audits of the financial statements of the Smith
Barney World Funds, Inc. (the "Funds") consisting of Global Government Bond
Portfolio, International All Cap Growth Portfolio, Emerging Markets Portfolio,
European Portfolio and Pacific Portfolio for the year ended October 31, 2000,
we considered its internal control, including control procedures for
safeguarding securities, in order to determine our auditing procedures for the
purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and to comply
with the requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on the internal
control.

The management of the Funds is responsible for establishing and maintaining
internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments
by management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs
of controls.  Generally, controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the
entity's objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.  Those controls include the
safeguarding of assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or fraud may occur
and not be detected.  Also, projection of any evaluation of internal control
to future periods is subject to the risk that it may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily disclose all
matters in the internal control that might be material weaknesses under
standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants.  A material weakness is a condition in which the design or
operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce to
a relatively low level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in
amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements being
audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in
the normal course of performing their assigned functions.  However, we noted
no matters involving the internal control and its operation, including
controls for safeguarding securities that we consider to be material
weaknesses as defined above as of October 31, 2000.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of management, the
Board of Directors of the Fund, and the Securities and Exchange Commission and
is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than the
specified parties.


New York, New York
December 11, 2000
<PAGE>

                   GREENPOINT FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                  EXHIBIT 11.1
              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                         QUARTER ENDED         SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                           JUNE 30,                JUNE 30,
                                     ----------------------  ---------------------
                                       2000        1999        2000       1999
                                     ----------  ----------  ---------  ----------
                                       (IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

<S>                                   <C>        <C>         <C>        <C>
Net income                            $   65.3   $    59.9   $  123.2   $    94.9
                                     ==========  ==========  =========  ==========

Weighted average number of common
  shares outstanding during each
  year - basic                            90.5        95.7       91.0        94.9

Weighted average number of common
  shares and common stock
  equivalents outstanding during
  each year - diluted                     91.6        98.2       92.0        97.3

Basic earnings per share              $   0.72   $    0.63   $   1.35   $    1.00
                                     ==========  ==========  =========  ==========

Diluted earnings per share            $   0.71   $    0.61   $   1.34   $    0.98
                                     ==========  ==========  =========  ==========
</TABLE>
Order filed, November 03, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00872-CV

____________

RYAN LOPEZ, Appellant

V.

ENSIGN U.S. SOUTHERN DRILLING, LLC, AND FREEPORTMCMORAN OIL & GAS, LLC D/B/A PLAINS EXPLORATION & 

PRODUCTION COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 281st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2014-21405

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due September 07, 2015. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.
We order Rhonda Armbruster, the official court reporter, to file the record 

in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 8 A1 55 6 . DONALD J . ADAMS et a l . v . NELLI E ANN ADAMS et a l

.

Nel l ie An n Ad am s an d Ed i t h Ch at fi el d (t h e “ Pl ai n t i ffs ”) fi l ed a d i s po s s es s o ry

act i on ag ai n st Jay Ad am s an d Lo rrai n e Ad am s (t h e “ Defen d an ts ”). Th e Defen d an t s

an s wered an d fi l ed co u nt e r c l a i m s ag ai n s t t he Pl ai n ti ffs

. Th e tri al co u rt en t ered an

o rd er req u i ri n g th e Defen d an ts t o p ay $ 4 0 0 o f ren t p er m o n th i nt o t h e reg i s t ry o f t h e

t ri al co u rt o n May 3 0

, 2 01 7

. Th e t ri al co u rt s ub s e q u e n t l y en t ered an o rd er g ran t i n g

t h e Pl ai n ti ffs a wri t o f po s ses s i o n t o t h e s u b ject p ro p ert y o n Feb ru ary 2 6

, 2 0 1 8

. Th e

Feb ru ary 2 6

, 2 0 1 8 o rd er res erv ed fo r t ri al t h e is s u es o f t he Defen d an t s ’ fai l u re to

m ak e ren t al pay m en t s

, a t t o rn ey fees

, an d t he Defen d an t s ’ co u n t ercl ai m s

. Th e

Defen d an t s fi l ed a n o t i ce of ap p eal o f t h e t ri al co u rt ’ s o rd er o n M arch 1 , 2 0 1 8 . W e,

h o wev er, l ack ju ri s di ct i o n.

H e r e, th e t ri al co u rt ’ s o rd er i s n o t fi n al b ecau s e t h e t ri al co u rt h as n o t y et

ad ju d i cat ed t h e is s u es of t h e Defen d an ts ’ fai l u re t o m a k e ren t al p ay m en t s

, at t o rn ey

fees

, an d t h e Defen dan t s ’ co u n t ercl ai m s

. Co n s eq u en t l y

, b ecau s e t h i s act i o n rem ai n s

p en di n g b el o w, th e Defen d an t s were r e q u i r e d t o u s e t h e in t erl o cu t o ry ap p eal

p ro ced u r e s

– i n cl u d i n g o b t ai n i n g a cert i fi cat e o f i m m ed i at e rev i ew fro m t h e t ri al co u rt May 04, 2018– t o ap peal t h e t ri al co u rt ’ s o rd er. See OCGA § 5 -6 -3 4 (b ); Bo yd v. S t a t e

, 1 9 1 Ga

. Ap p

. 4 3 5

, 4 3 5 (3 8 3 SE2 d 9 06 ) (1 9 8 9 ). T h e Defen d an t s’ fai lu re t o d o s o d ep ri v es u s

o f ju ri s d ict i o n o v er t hi s ap p eal , wh i ch i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e is a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 05/04/2018