alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF Sean Regan HANOVER.

No. D-3054.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Jan. 13, 2020.

Sean Regan Hanover, of Fairfax, Virginia, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018272EN.01001701.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 3.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 272/17 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9020 — ENGIE/GreenYellow/JV)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 272/07)

1.

On 27 July 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018272EN.01001701-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | ENGIE SA (‘ENGIE’, France), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | GreenYellow SAS (‘GreenYellow’, France), belonging to the group Casino. |

ENGIE and GreenYellow acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of a newly created company (the ‘JV’).

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   ENGIE: activities in the sectors of gas, electricity and energy-related services,

—   GreenYellow: activities in the sector of photovoltaic solutions and energy efficiency.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018272EN.01001701-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9020 — ENGIE/GreenYellow/JV

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018272EN.01001701-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018272EN.01001701-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1192 

AN ACT 

To redesignate Mammoth Peak in Yosemite National Park 

as ‘‘Mount Jessie Benton Fre ́mont’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1192 EH

1 SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

2 Congress finds that Jessie Benton Fre ́mont— 

3 (1) was the daughter of United States Senator 

4 Thomas Hart Benton of Missouri, a leading pro5 ponent of the concept of Manifest Destiny that advo6 cated for the Nation to expand its borders westward; 

7 (2) became fluent in French and Spanish, was 

8 a gifted writer, and was at ease in any political dis9 cussion; 

10 (3) married John C. Fre ́mont, who was as11 signed to explore the West; 

12 (4) transformed John C. Fre ́mont’s descriptions 

13 from his treks into prose that was used by pioneers 

14 to guide their route West; 

15 (5) traveled to California in 1849 to join her 

16 husband at their Mariposa ranch, where gold had 

17 been discovered; 

18 (6) became involved in John C. Fre ́mont’s 1856 

19 campaign for Presidency, which proposed the aboli20 tion of slavery, a notion that Jessie Benton Fre ́mont 

21 also supported; 

22 (7) moved to Bear Valley, California, with her 

23 husband John C. Fre ́mont in 1858 and thereafter 

24 realized the need to preserve the land that would be25 come Yosemite National Park for future generations; 
3 

•HR 1192 EH

1 (8) entertained men such as Horace Greeley, 

2 Thomas Starr King, and United States Senator Ed3 ward Baker of Oregon, and urged them to begin a 

4 process that ultimately led to the establishment of 

5 Yosemite National Park; 

6 (9) influenced President Abraham Lincoln to 

7 sign the Act entitled ‘‘An Act authorizing a Grant 

8 to the State of California of the ‘Yo-Semite Valley’ 

9 and of the Land embracing the ‘Mariposa Big Tree 

10 Grove’ ’’, approved June 30, 1864 (commonly known 

11 as the Yosemite Grant), the first instance of land 

12 being set aside specifically for its preservation and 

13 public use by a national government; and 

14 (10) set the foundation for the creation of na15 tional parks and California State parks through her 

16 advocacy for and influence on the Yosemite Grant. 

17 SEC. 2. REDESIGNATION OF MAMMOTH PEAK AS MOUNT 

18 JESSIE BENTON FRE ́ MONT. 

19 (a) IN GENERAL.—The peak known as ‘‘Mammoth 

20 Peak’’ in Yosemite National Park (located at NPS coordi21 nates 37.855° N, -119.264° W) shall be redesignated as 

22 ‘‘Mount Jessie Benton Fre ́mont’’ and may be known infor23 mally as ‘‘Mt. Jessie’’ in honor of the contributions of Jes24 sie Benton Fre ́mont to the approval of the Yosemite 

25 Grant. 
4 

•HR 1192 EH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, record, or other paper of the United 

3 States to the peak described in subsection (a) shall be con4 sidered to be a reference to ‘‘Mount Jessie Benton 

5 Fre ́mont’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 14, 2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1192 

AN ACT 

To redesignate Mammoth Peak in Yosemite 

National Park as ‘‘Mount Jessie Benton Fre ́mont’’.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6105

FRED SHORES, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM ONEAL RHOADES; JAMES METTS, High

Sheriff; ONE DOE DEFENDANT DETECTIVE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. William B. Traxler, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-94-1704-6-21-AK)

Submitted: July 25, 1996 Decided: August 7, 1996

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam

opinion.

Fred Shores, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Wilburn Brewer, Jr., Thomas

C.R. Legare, Jr., NEXSEN, PRUET, JACOBS & POLLARD, Columbia, South

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have scrutinized

the record and the district court's opinion reviewing the magistrate judge's recommendation, granting summary judgment in favor of

two of the defendants, dismissing without prejudice Defendant

Rhoades, and denying Appellant's post-judgment motions. Our examination reveals no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Shores v. Rhoades, No. CA-94-1704-

6-21-AK (D.S.C. Jan. 5, 1996). To the extent that Appellant seeks

to appeal the district court's order dismissing without prejudice

Defendant Rhoades, that order is not appealable because the defect

upon which the dismissal was based could be cured by amending the

complaint. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392,

10 F.3d 1064 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, this Court does not have

jurisdiction over this portion of the appeal and it must be dismissed. We deny Appellant's motion to remand and dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART, DISMISSED IN PART
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1026 

To exempt certain class A CDL drivers from the requirement to obtain 

a hazardous material endorsement while operating a service vehicle with 

a fuel tank containing 3,785 liters (1,000 gallons) or less of diesel 

fuel. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2013 

Mr. NEUGEBAUER (for himself and Mr. PETERSON) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To exempt certain class A CDL drivers from the requirement 

to obtain a hazardous material endorsement while operating a service vehicle with a fuel tank containing 3,785 

liters (1,000 gallons) or less of diesel fuel. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HAZARDOUS MATERIAL ENDORSEMENT EX4 EMPTION. 

5 (a) EXCLUSION.—Section 5117(d)(1) of title 49, 

6 United States Code, is amended— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1026 IH

1 (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

2 the end; 

3 (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period 

4 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(D) a service vehicle carrying diesel fuel 

7 in quantities of 3,785 liters (1,000 gallons) or 

8 less that is— 

9 ‘‘(i) driven by a class A commercial 

10 driver’s license holder who is a custom har11 vester, an agricultural retailer, an agricul12 tural business employee, an agricultural 

13 cooperative employee, or an agricultural 

14 producer; and 

15 ‘‘(ii) clearly marked with a placard 

16 reading ‘Diesel Fuel’.’’. 

17 (b) EXEMPTION.—Section 31315(b) of title 49, 

18 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 

19 following: 

20 ‘‘(8) HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ENDORSEMENT

21 EXEMPTION.—The Secretary shall exempt all class A 

22 commercial driver’s license holders who are custom 

23 harvesters, agricultural retailers, agricultural busi24 ness employees, agricultural cooperative employees, 

25 or agricultural producers from the requirement to 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1026 IH

1 obtain a hazardous material endorsement under part 

2 383 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, while 

3 operating a service vehicle carrying diesel fuel in 

4 quantities of 3,785 liters (1,000 gallons) or less if 

5 the tank containing such fuel is clearly marked with 

6 a placard reading ‘Diesel Fuel’.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
NO. 07-01-0229 -CR IN THE COU RT OF APP EALS FOR THE SEVENT H DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMA RILLO PANE L A OCTOBER 2, 2001

______________________________ ELMER EDS ON HAYES, AK A EDDIE HAY ES, APPE LLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________ FROM THE 10 8TH DIST RICT COURT OF POTT ER COUNTY; NO. 43.619-E; H ONORAB LE ABELOPEZ, JU DGE

_______________________________ Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ. DISMI SSAL Pursuant to a guilty plea and plea bargain, appe ll an t wa s convicted for reckless in ju ry to a c hild causing serious bodily i njury and p unishment w as assessed as recom mende d atten years confinem ent. Appellant filed a pro se general notice of appeal from his conviction. W e dismiss this appeal for w ant of j urisdiction.2

W hen an appeal is made from a judgm ent rendered on a defendant’ s guilty plea and the punishment

assessed does n otexceed t he punishment recom mende d by the State, a notice of appeal m ust com ply with Rule 25.2(b)(3) of the Tex as Rules of Ap pellate Procedure. Mo reo ver , th e Texa s C our t of Crim in al Appeals held in Cooper v. State, 45 S. W .3d 77, 83 (Tex.C r.App. 2001) that voluntariness of a plea is no longer appea labl e from plea-bargained felony convictions. Thus, because appellant filed a general no t ice of appeal, we are withoutjurisdiction to entertain any possible com plaints appellant might have raised. Accordingly, we dism iss for want of jurisdiction.
Don H. Reavis Justice Do not publish.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RAYMOND DAVID,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 190 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of October, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 3

- 0 1024

- C R

Style: Mario Quintanilla

v The State of Texas

Date motion filed * : February 13 , 201 4

Type of motion: Motion to abate appeal

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed:

If motion to extend time:

Original due date:

Number of extensions granted: Current Due date:

Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due:

 No further extensions of time will be granted

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot )

 Other: _____________________________________

Judge's signature: /s/ Sherry Radack



Panel consists of

____________________________________________

Date: February 2 5 , 2014
Twila HAYNES, Petitioner v. RIVERSIDE PRESBYTERIAN APARTMENTS

No. 19-5957

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office denied.
# C_2018444EN.01001801.xml

| 10.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 444/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 444/18

---

Special Report No 32/2018

‘European Union Emergency Trust Fund for Africa: Flexible but lacking focus’

(2018/C 444/08)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 32/2018 ‘European Union Emergency Trust Fund for Africa: Flexible but lacking focus’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu.

---
Michael N. THOMAS, Petitioner v. Raymond ANDERSON, et al.

No. 18-1424

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1092 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1092

 To designate the air route traffic control center located in Nashua, 
New Hampshire, as the ``Patricia Clark Boston Air Route Traffic Control 
                               Center''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 12, 2013

 Ms. Kuster (for herself and Ms. Shea-Porter) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the air route traffic control center located in Nashua, 
New Hampshire, as the ``Patricia Clark Boston Air Route Traffic Control 
                               Center''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF PATRICIA CLARK BOSTON AIR ROUTE TRAFFIC 
              CONTROL CENTER.

    (a) In General.--The air route traffic control center located in 
Nashua, New Hampshire, and any successor air route traffic control 
center at that location, shall be known and designated as the 
``Patricia Clark Boston Air Route Traffic Control Center''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the air route traffic 
control center referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a 
reference to the ``Patricia Clark Boston Air Route Traffic Control 
Center''.
                                 <all>
```
Robert HUFF, et al., Petitioners, v. Michele CHOATE.

No. 19-626

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 21, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
# C_2020375EN.01004401.xml

| 6.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 375/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 375/44

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9619 — CDC/EDF/ENGIE/La Poste)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 375/05)

On 11 August 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9619. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9619. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 116 (Thursday, June 16, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 36347]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12948]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: June 16, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
June 10, 2022, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 746 to Competitive Product List. 
Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2022-66, CP2022-
72.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2022-12948 Filed 6-15-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Kathleen C. HAMPTON, Petitioner v. PROF-2013-S3 LEGAL TITLE TRUST, et al.

No. 18-9127

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
----

(2004/C 70 E/155)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2866/03

by Anne André-Léonard (ELDR) to the Council

(26 September 2003)

Subject:   The ‘European Public Affairs and Human Rights Office’ of the Church of Scientology

The setting up of the Church of Scientology's European Public Affairs and Human Rights Office in Brussels, and the Church's lobbying threatened to lead to confusion between the work of the European institutions and those of scientologists.

The latter avoid presenting themselves as members of the Church of Scientology, and use satellite organisations to infiltrate the European institutions.

What does the Council think of the lobbying practices of Scientology, which uses religion as a commercial product?

Reply

(8 December 2003)

The Council has not discussed the question raised by the Honourable Member.

----
IN RE Jonathan E. BRUNSON, Petitioner.

No. 19-5225.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
W.A., Individually and on Behalf of W.E., et al., Petitioners, v. HENDRICK HUDSON CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT.

No. 19-616

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 21, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
# Official Journal L 297/26 O

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 297 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4926 October 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 297

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4926 October 2006

---

| Contents | | II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Council |
| | * | Council Decision of 5 October 2006 on the accession of the Community to the Hague Conference on Private International Law | 1 |

Contents

II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory

page

Council

*

Council Decision of 5 October 2006 on the accession of the Community to the Hague Conference on Private International Law

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.