alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

May 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

132968 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
Justices

v SC: 132968 COA: 270910 Cass CC: 02-010245-FC 02-010246-FC BRUCE ALLEN HELBLING, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 6, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

s0521 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 30, 2007

Clerk
(logo) Brookfield

 

**ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

 

 

CERTIFICATION

 

Benchmark 2018-B2 Mortgage Trust,

Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates

Series 2018-B2 (the “Trust”)

 

I, Kathryn Gregorio, on behalfof BREF Partners Special Servicer LLC as special servicer for the Red BuildingWhole Loan, certify to J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.and each Other Depositor and their respective officers, directors andaffiliates, and with the knowledge and intent that they will rely upon thiscertification, that:

 

1.       I (or Servicing Officers under mysupervision) have reviewed the Certifying Servicer’s activities between Jan 1,2022 and December 31, 2022 (the “Reporting Period”) and the CertifyingServicer’s performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and

 

2.       To the best of my knowledge, basedon such review, the Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligationsunder the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects during theReporting Period.

 

 

Dated: March 1, 2023

 

 

BREF PARTNERS SPECIAL SERVICERLLC, as special servicer for the Red Building Whole Loan

 

 

By: /s/ Kathryn Gregorio 

Name: Kathryn Gregorio 

Title: Senior Vice President
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 121 (Friday, June 24, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 37859]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13462]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Community Living

Notice of Federal Review of the American Samoa Protection and 
Advocacy System (P&A)

AGENCY: Administration for Community Living, Health and Human Services 
(HHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Representatives of the Administration on Disabilities (AoD), 
Administration for Community Living (ACL), will be conducting a federal 
review of the American Samoa Protection and Advocacy System (P&A) on 
September 19-23, 2022. AoD is soliciting comments from interested 
parties on your experiences with the program, and strategies employed 
by P&A in meeting the needs of individuals with developmental 
disabilities and their families in American Samoa. You are encouraged 
to share your experiences by way of any of the following methods:

DATES: Comments should be received by September 1, 2022 in order to be 
included in the final report.

ADDRESSES: EMAIL: [email protected], TELEPHONE: 202-475-2482, 
MAIL COMMENTS TO: Elizabeth Leef, Program Specialist, Administration on 
Disabilities, Administration for Community Living, 330 C Street SW, 1st 
Floor, Washington, DC 20201.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Leef, Administration for 
Community Living, Administration on Disabilities, 330 C Street SW, 1st 
Floor, Washington, DC 20201, 202-475-2482.
    Authority: 45 CFR 1326.21(h)

    Dated: June 15, 2022.
Alison Barkoff,
Acting Administrator & Assistant Secretary for Aging.
[FR Doc. 2022-13462 Filed 6-23-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4154-01-P
```
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
the Smith Barney Managed Municipals Portfolio Inc.:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements 
of the Smith Barney Managed Municipals Portfolio Inc. (the 
"Portfolio") for the year ended May 31, 1998, we considered its 
internal control, including control activities for safeguarding 
securities, in order to determine our auditing procedures for the 
purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and 
to comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide 
assurance on the internal control.

The management of the Portfolio is responsible for establishing 
and maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this 
responsibility, estimates and judgments by management are 
required to assess the expected benefits and related costs of 
controls.  Generally, controls that are relevant to an audit 
pertain to the entity's objective of preparing financial 
statements for external purposes that are fairly presented in 
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Those 
controls include the safeguarding of assets against unauthorized 
acquisition, use, or disposition. 

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or 
irregularities may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection 
of any evaluation of internal control to future periods is 
subject to the risk that it may become inadequate because of 
changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and 
operation may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily 
disclose all matters in the internal control that might be 
material weaknesses under standards established by the American 
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness 
is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of 
the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively 
low level the risk that errors or irregularities in amounts that 
would be material in relation to the financial statements being 
audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by 
employees in the normal course of performing their assigned 
functions.  However, we noted no matters involving the internal 
control and its operation, including controls for safeguarding 
securities that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined 
above. 

This report is intended solely for the information and use of 
management, the Board of Directors of the Portfolio, and the 
Securities and Exchange Commission.



July 15, 1998
David SAMARRIPA, et al., Petitioners v. Gregory KIZZIAH, Warden, et al.

No. 19-164

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 12, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Walid JAMMAL, et al., Petitioners v. AMERICAN FAMILY INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.

No. 19-248

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for rehearing denied.
Donald Earl WHITAKER and Thomas Lee Whitaker, Jr., Co-Administrators of the Estate of Carlton Whitaker, Deceased v. TOWN OF SCOTLAND NECK, C.T. Hasty, Individually and in his official capacity as Safety Director of the Town of Scotland Neck, and Douglas Braddy, Individually and in his official capacity as Public Works Superintendent for the Town of Scotland Neck.

No. 49PA03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2004.

Patrick H. Flanagan, Charlotte, Donna R. Rascoe, Edward C. LeCarpentier, III, David H. Batten, Raleigh, for Town of Scotland Neck, et al.

Frank D. Lawrence, for Whitakers.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiffs on the 11th day of December 2003 for rehearing of the decision of this Court pursuant to Rule 31, N.C. Rules of Appellate Procedure, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2004."
# C_2020195EN.01000201.xml

| 10.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9696 — ArcelorMittal Neel Tailored Blanks/TT Steel Service India/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 195/02)

On 22 April 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9696. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9696. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Cary VANDERMEULEN, Petitioner v. Thomas L. LECLAIRE, et al.

No. 19-6768

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter

Citation Limited Pursuant to 1st Cir. Loc. R. 32.3

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 00-1202

UNITED STATES,

Appellee,

v.

ALI HUSSEIN ADDO,

Defendant, Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. George A. O'Toole, Jr., U.S. District Judge]

Before

 Lynch, Circuit Judge,

Campbell and Stahl, Senior Circuit Judges.

Ali Hussein Addo on brief pro se.

Michael J. Sullivan, United States Attorney, and Timothy Q.

Feeley, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.

August 26, 2003
-2-

Per Curiam. Ali Hussein Addo pled guilty to one

count of defrauding Eastern Bank, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §

1344. Addo opened an Eastern Bank bank account using a false

name and identification document, deposited into the account

approximately $30,000 of worthless checks and thereafter

withdrew $9,503.75 before the account was closed by the bank.

Addo has appealed. We affirm.

We first note that Addo erroneously claims that he

entered a conditional plea. That contention is plainly wrong.

See Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(a)(2). And, to the extent that there

was any "condition" to his plea agreement -- and the evidence

on this point is sparse at best -- Addo's description of the

alleged condition is so implausible as to be incredible.

According to Addo, the government agreed not to prosecute him

in any way at any time for fraudulent activity with respect to

Fleet Bank accounts. The government concedes that it agreed

that, in computing "intended loss" for purposes of sentencing

Addo for his scheme to defraud Eastern Bank, it would not

include any loss to Fleet Bank with respect to accounts held in

the name of Farah Kalif Adan and Yusuf Ali. Fleet Bank ATM

cards issued in those names were found in Addo's possession

when he was arrested.

Even were we to accept Addo's contention that any

side agreement covered prosecution and not simply sentencing
-3-

calculation, at best, the agreement could conceivably have

concerned only past fraudulent activity with respect to the

Farah Kalif Adan and Yusuf Ali Fleet Bank accounts and not

future fraudulent activity. And, Addo proffers no evidence

that he has been charged with any fraudulent activity with

respect to these accounts. Therefore, contrary to Addo's

contention, the government has not violated any "condition" to

his plea agreement. Addo's claim that the government agreed to

immunize him from prosecution for any fraudulent activity with

respect to any Fleet Bank account at any time is simply

preposterous.

We have considered the remaining issues raised by

Addo in his appellate brief and conclude they are without

merit.

Addo's motion for an expedited appeal is moot.

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6786

RONNIE SYLVIA, 

 Plaintiff – Appellant, 

 v. 

TOMMY MADDOX; TONI BANKS; D. WEAVER; N. AUSTIN, 

 Defendants – Appellees, 

 

 and 

KEITH WHITENER, 

 Defendant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, 

Senior District Judge. (5:05-cv-00013-GCM) 

Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: October 21, 2009 

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Jeffrey Michael Brandt, ROBINSON & BRANDT, PSC, Covington, 

Kentucky, for Appellant. James Philip Allen, Assistant Attorney 

General, Joseph Edward Elder, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF 

JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Ronnie Sylvia seeks to appeal the district court’s 

orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and 

denying his motion for reconsideration. We dismiss the appeal 

for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not 

timely filed. 

 Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of 

the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends 

the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period 

is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of 

Corr., 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. 

Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). 

 The district court’s orders were entered on the docket 

on August 7, 2007, and August 28, 2007. The notice of appeal 

was filed no sooner than April 9, 2009. Because Sylvia failed 

to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or 

reopening of the appeal period, we deny his motion for 

appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and oral 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Independent Auditors' Consent



To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
Smith Barney Income Funds:

We consent to the use of our report dated February 10, 1998 for Smith 
Barney Premium Total Return Fund incorporated herein by reference and 
to the references to our Firm under the headings "Financial 
Highlights" in the Prospectus and "Counsel and Auditors" in the 
Statement of Additional Information.




	KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


New York, New York
April 21, 1998
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,**


**SECTION 1350**




In
        connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Mendocino Brewing
        Company, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
        December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
        the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mahadevan Narayanan, Chief Financial Officer
        of the Company, certify, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code,
        Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date:
        April 14, 2008




/s/ Mahadevan
              NarayananName:
                Mahadevan Narayanan
              Title:
                Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350





(SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





I, Song
Jinan, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of China-Biotics,
Inc. (the "Registrant"), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based upon a
review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended December 31,
2008 of the Registrant (the “Report”):





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of The
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




/s/
      Song JinanSong
      JinanChief
      Executive OfficerMarch
      20, 2009
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
the Smith Barney Institutional Cash Management Fund, Inc.:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements 
of Municipal Portfolio of the Smith Barney Institutional Cash 
Management Fund, Inc. (the "Fund") for the year ended 
May 31, 1998, we considered its internal control, including 
control activities for safeguarding securities, in order to 
determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing 
our opinion on the financial statements and to comply with the 
requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on the 
internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and 
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility, 
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the 
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally, 
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's 
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes 
that are fairly presented in conformity with generally accepted 
accounting principles. Those controls include the safeguarding of 
assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition. 

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or 
irregularities may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection 
of any evaluation of internal control to future periods is 
subject to the risk that it may become inadequate because of 
changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and 
operation may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily 
disclose all matters in the internal control that might be 
material weaknesses under standards established by the American 
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness 
is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of 
the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively 
low level the risk that errors or irregularities in amounts that 
would be material in relation to the financial statements being 
audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by 
employees in the normal course of performing their assigned 
functions.  However, we noted no matters involving the internal 
control and its operation, including controls for safeguarding 
securities that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined 
above. 

This report is intended solely for the information and use of 
management, the Board of Directors of the Fund, and the 
Securities and Exchange Commission.



July 15, 1998
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CertificatePursuant to Rule 15d-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**

I, Diana S.Ferguson, certify that:

1. I have reviewedthis quarterly report of Merisant Company (“the registrant”);

2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

# (a)                                  Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

# (b)                                 Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

# (c)                                  Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

# 5.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

# (a)                                  Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

# (b)                                 Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date:  August 10, 2007
|        |   | /s/ Diana S. Ferguson          |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------|
|   |   | Name: Diana S. Ferguson        |
|   |   | Title: Chief Financial Officer |

 

----