alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
January 24, 1997
Smith Barney Massachusetts Municipals Fund
388 Greenwich Street
New York, New York 10013

                   Re:  Rule 24f-2 Notice
                              
Gentlemen:

    In connection with the filing by Smith Barney
Massachusetts Municipals Fund, a Massachusetts business
trust (the "Trust"), of a Notice (the "Notice"), pursuant to
Rule 24f-2 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as
amended (the "Act"), for the Trust's fiscal year ended
November 30,1996 the undersigned hereby provides the legal
opinion required by that Rule.

     In accordance with Rule 24f-2, the Trust has registered
an indefinite number of shares of beneficial interest,
$0.001 par value, under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the "1933 Act"). The purpose of the Notice is to
make definite the registration of 711,754 shares of the
Trust (the "Shares") sold in reliance upon the Rule during
the fiscal year ended November 30, 1996.

     The undersigned is Associate General Counsel of Smith
Barney Mutual Funds Management Inc., the Trust's
administrator, and in such capacity, from time to time and
for certain purposes, acts as counsel to the Trust. She has
examined copies of the Trust's Master Trust Agreement, its
By-Laws, resolutions adopted by its Board of Trustees, and
such other records and documents as have been deemed
necessary for purposes of this opinion.  Furthermore, she
has examined a Certificate of the Controller of the Trust to
the effect that the Trust received the cash consideration
for each of the Shares in accordance with the aforementioned
organizational documents and resolutions.

     On the basis of the foregoing, and assuming all of the
Shares were sold in accordance with the terms of the Trust's
Prospectus in effect at the time of sale, she is of the
opinion that the Shares have been duly authorized and
validly issued and are fully paid and non-assessable.  This
opinion is for the limited purposes expressed above and
should not be deemed to be an expression of opinion as to
compliance with the 1933 Act, the 1940 Act or applicable
State "blue sky" laws in connection with the sales of the
Shares.


                                        Very truly yours,


                                        Caren Cunningham
                                        Associate General
                                        Counsel
                                        of Smith Barney
Mutual Funds
Management Inc.
SMITH BARNEY INCOME FUND
10f-3 REPORT
July 1, 1998 through January 31, 1999


										
				Trade								% of
Issuer				Date	Selling Dealer			Amount
	Price	Issue

NYS Dorm Mental Health		7/17/98	Pru-Beche			$5,750,000
	$96.706	6.55%
5.00% due 2/15/2023			George K. Baum & Co.
					Samuel Ramirez
					Bear Stearns

Telephone & Data Systems	7/27/98	Merrill Lynch		
	2,500,000	98.806	1.25%
7.00% due 8/1/2006

Loews Cineplex Ent.		7/31/98	Goldman, Sachs & Co.	
	1,500,000	99.185	4.67
8.875% due 8/1/2008

Loews Cineplex Ent.		7/31/98	Goldman, Sachs & Co.	
	1,000,000	99.185	5.75
8.875% due 8/1/2008

Loews Cineplex Ent.		7/31/98	Goldman, Sachs & Co.	
	1,500,000	99.185	5.75
8.875% due 8/1/2008

AES Corp. 			8/4/98	J.P. Morgan			2,231,250	44.625
	0.03
(Common Stock)

Phoenix Civic Airport		8/6/98	Bear Stearns		
	2,000,000	97.54	5.45
5.00% due 7/1/2025

Massachusetts Port. Auth. 		8/6/98	Paine Webber		
	3,000,000	96.39	5.23
5.00% due 7/1/2028

Pennsylvania Tpke Rev. Trans.	8/6/98	Artemis Capital		
	4,275,000	97.195	1.07
5.00% due 12/1/2018

NC Pitt Memorial Hosipital	8/28/98	Interstate Johnson	
	3,000,000	98.122	8.93
5.00% due 12/1/2018

Washington, DC Conv. Center	9/17/98	Paine Webber		
	2,300,000	97.991	3.78
5.00% due 10/1/2021

Royal Ahold Convertible Bond	9/24/98	Goldman, Sachs & Co.	
	4,000,000	52.840	0.62
3.00% due 9/30/2003

Conoco Inc.			10/21/98	Morgan Stanley			12,075,000
	23.00	2.05

Conoco Inc.			10/21/98	Morgan Stanley			4,830,000
	23.00	2.05

New York City Water		10/22/98	Paine Webber		
	6,450,000	98.349	7.76
5.00% due 6/15/2027			Morgan Stanley
					Dean Witter
					Artemis Capital
					William E. Simon & Sons
					J.P. Morgan
					Merrill Lynch
					Fleet Securities
					Lehman Brothers
					David Lerner Associates

Austin, Texas Utility		10/8/98	Morgan Stanley		
	2,577,672	46.071	2.45
Zero coupon due 5/15/2015

NYS Dorm Muni Health		11/13/98	Lehman Brothers		
	5,000,000	97.933	6.86
5.00% due 1/15/2023
EXHIBIT 32.2





Certification of the Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of K-Fed Bancorp (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dustin Luton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the company’s financial condition and results of operations.











Date: May 13, 2010
/s/ Dustin LutonDustin LutonChief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000919557
<NAME> Smith Barney Money Market Portfolio
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER>011
   <NAME>Travelers Series Fund Inc.

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     Oct-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                          Oct-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                 318,943,160
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                318,943,160
<RECEIVABLES>                             494,817
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                 29
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        319,438,006
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                        0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                         0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                 837,813
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                       837,813
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                 0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>              318,600,193
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                 318,600,193
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                 276,699,039
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                       0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                          0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                         0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                        0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                        0
<NET-ASSETS>                          318,600,193
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                               0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                      19,308,361
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  0
<EXPENSES-NET>                          1,639,451
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                17,668,910
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                       35
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                       0
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                  17,668,945
<EQUALIZATION>                                  0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>              17,668,910
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                       35
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                           0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>             1,419,611,349
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>         1,395,108,815
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                    17,398,620
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                 41,901,154
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                         0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                       0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                         0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                      0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                   1,539,190
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                         1,639,451
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                  307,490,564
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                       1.000
<PER-SHARE-NII>                             0.570
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                     0.000
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                        0.570
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                   0.000
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                        0.000
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                         1.000
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                              0.53



</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 227/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 227 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5027 September 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 227

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5027 September 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 227/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 1 |
| 2007/C 227/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 4 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2007/C 227/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

1

2007/C 227/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

4

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 227/03 | Euro exchange rates | 9 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2007/C 227/03

Euro exchange rates

9

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 227/04 | Call for proposals: Services in support of business and innovation | 10 |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL POLICY |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 227/05 | Notice of initiation of a partial interim review of the countervailing measures applicable to imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) originating in India | 16 |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 227/06 | Publication of an application for registration pursuant to Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin of agricultural products and foodstuffs | 20 |

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Commission

2007/C 227/04

Call for proposals: Services in support of business and innovation

10

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL POLICY

Commission

2007/C 227/05

Notice of initiation of a partial interim review of the countervailing measures applicable to imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) originating in India

16

OTHER ACTS

Commission

2007/C 227/06

Publication of an application for registration pursuant to Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin of agricultural products and foodstuffs

20

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Felix A. OKAFOR, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5750

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1391 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 18, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

Designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 25 South Oak Street in London, Ohio, as 

the ‘‘London Fallen Veterans Memorial Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1391 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. LONDON FALLEN VETERANS MEMORIAL POST 

2 OFFICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 25 South Oak Street in London, 

5 Ohio, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘London Fall6 en Veterans Memorial Post Office’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘London Fallen Vet11 erans Memorial Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 17, 2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


rfrederick on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TERESA DE JESUS PATINO

GONZALEZ, Petitioner,

v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent. No. 17

- 71761 Agency No. A095

- 194

- 152

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted June 12, 2018 * *
Before: RAWLINSON, CLIFTON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
Teresa De Jesus Patino

- Gonzalez , a native and citizen of Mexico, petition s pro se for review of t he Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen . Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for
abuse of discretion the d enial of a motion to re open
. Mohammed v. Gonzales , 400

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 14 2018
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 71761

F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir. 2005)

. We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for
review. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Patino

- Gonzalez ’ s seventh
motion to reopen as untimely and number

- barred , where she filed it more than nine years after the order of removal became final, and she has not established that any statutory or regulatory exception applies

. S ee 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7), 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c) (2), (3)

. The court ’s jurisdiction to review the BIA’s s ua sponte determination is
limited to reviewing the reasoning behind the decision for legal or constitutional

error , and Patino

- Gonzalez has not established any error. See Bonilla v. Lynch , 840 F.3d 575, 588 (9th Cir. 2016) ; De Mercado v. Mukasey, 566 F.3d 810, 816 n. 5 (9th Cir. 2009) (denial of an application for cancellation of removal does not implicate constitutional rights concerning family unity or child rearing).
We lack jurisdiction to consider Patino

- Gonzalez ’s challenges to the agency’s underlying hardship determination, because this petition is not timely as
to that order. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1) ( petition for review of a final order of
removal must be filed within 30 days of that order ); Martinez

- Serrano v. INS , 94
F.3d 1256 , 1258 (9th Cir. 1996) (this court lacks jurisdiction to review an underlying order of removal on petition for review from the denial of a later motion to reopen).3 17

- 71761

We lack jurisdiction to consider Patino

- Gonzale z ’s request for prosecutorial
discretion or deferred action

. See Vilchiz

- Soto v. Holder , 688 F.3d 642, 644 (9th Cir. 2012) (order).
We do not consider the documents that Patino

- Gonzalez submitted with h er opening brief because they were not part of the administrative record. See
8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(A) (judicial review is limited to the administrative record);
Dent v. Holder , 627 F.3d 365, 371 (9th Cir. 2010) (stating standard for review of out of record evidence).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part, DISMISSED in part.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 VIASPACE INC.
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of VIASPACE Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: August 11, 2006
    
    /s/ CARL KUKKONENCarl KukkonenChief Executive Officer
Anthony Lee MCNAIR, Petitioner v. NORTH CAROLINA

No. 19-6765

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of North Carolina denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.10.1

Schedule identifying substantially identical agreements, between Visteon
Corporation ("Visteon") and each of the persons named below, to the Revised
Change in Control Agreement constituting Exhibit 10.10 to the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Visteon for the period ended December 31, 2003.

                                      Name

                              Peter J. Pestillo
                              Michael F. Johnston
                              Daniel R. Coulson
                              James C. Orchard
                              Anjan Chatterjee
                              Stacy L. Fox
                              Robert H. Marcin
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 109 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 109

 Providing for the approval of the Congress of the proposed agreement 
for cooperation between the American Institute in Taiwan and the Taipei 
   Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the United States 
   concerning peaceful uses of nuclear energy pursuant to the Atomic 
                          Energy Act of 1954.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 10, 2014

 Mr. Royce (for himself and Mr. Engel) introduced the following joint 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for the approval of the Congress of the proposed agreement 
for cooperation between the American Institute in Taiwan and the Taipei 
   Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the United States 
   concerning peaceful uses of nuclear energy pursuant to the Atomic 
                          Energy Act of 1954.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress does favor 
the proposed agreement for cooperation transmitted to the Congress by 
the President on January 7, 2014.
                                 <all>
```
# Official Journal L 48/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 48 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5820 February 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 48

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5820 February 2015

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/227 of 9 January 2015 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to supervisory reporting of institutions according to Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/227 of 9 January 2015 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to supervisory reporting of institutions according to Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
John DOE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-665

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Alexander A. BENZEMANN, Petitioner, v. HOUSLANGER & ASSOCIATES, PLLC, et al.

No. 18-1567

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
January 24, 1996
Smith Barney Principal Return Fund.
388 Greenwich Street
New York, New York 10013

                   Re:  Rule 24f-2 Notice
                              
Gentlemen:

    In connection with the filing by Smith Barney Principal
Return Fund, a Massachusetts business trust (the "Trust"),
of a Notice (the "Notice"), pursuant to Rule 24f-2 under the
Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Act"), for
the Trust's fiscal year ended November 30,1996, the
undersigned hereby provides the legal opinion required by
that Rule.

     In accordance with Rule 24f-2, the Trust has registered
an indefinite number of shares of common stock, $0.001 par
value, under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"1933 Act"). The purpose of the Notice is to make definite
the registration of  6,034,866 shares of the Trust (the
"Shares") sold in reliance upon the Rule during the fiscal
year ended November 30, 1996.

     The undersigned is Deputy General Counsel of Smith
Barney Mutual Funds Management Inc., the Trust
administrator, and in such capacity, from time to time and
for certain purposes, acts as counsel to the Fund. He has
examined copies of the Trust's Declaration of Trust, its By-
Laws, resolutions adopted by its Board of Trustees, and such
other records and documents as have been deemed necessary
for purposes of this opinion.  Furthermore, he has examined
a Certificate of the Controller of the Trust to the effect
that the Trust received the cash consideration for each of
the Shares in accordance with the aforementioned
organizational documents and resolutions.

     On the basis of the foregoing, and assuming all of the
Prospectus in effect at the time of sale, he is of the
opinion that the Shares have been duly authorized and
validly issued and are fully paid and non-assessable.  This
opinion is for the limited purposes expressed above and
should not be deemed to be an expression of opinion as to
compliance with the 1933 Act, the 1940 Act or applicable
State "blue sky" laws in connection with the sales of the
Shares.


                                        Very truly yours,


                                        Robert Vegliante
                                        Deputy General
                                        Counsel
                                        of Smith Barney
Mutual Funds
Management Inc.