alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

August 5, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00132

- CR

Leonard Garcia LAZO

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas
Trial Cou rt No. 12

- 05

- 00060

- CRK Honorable Bert Richardson, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant Leonard Garcia Lazo’s court

- appointed attorney has filed a brief and motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal. Counsel states he has sent copies of the brief and motion to withdraw to appellant and written a letter explaining to Lazo his rights to review the record and
file a pro se brief and to file a pr o se petition for discretionary review if this court determines the appeal is frivolous. See Kelly v. State , No. PD

- 0702

- 13, 2014 WL 2865901 ( Tex. Crim. App. June 25, 2014).

If appellant desires to file a pro se brief, we order that he do so on or befor e September 4, 2014

. If appellant desires to review the appellate record, he must file a written request for access to the record with this court by August 20, 2014 . The request must be mailed to: Fourth Court of Ap peals

, 300 Dolorosa, Suite 3200

, San Antonio, Texas 78232

. If Lazo timely requests access to the record, the deadline to file appellant’s pro se brief will be reset.

If appellant files a timely pro se brief, the State may file a responsive brief no later than thirty days after appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this court. Alternatively, if appellant does not file a timely pro se brief, the State may file a brief in response to counsel’s brief no lat er than
October 6, 2014

.We further order the motion to withdraw filed by appellant’s counsel is held in abeyance pending further order of the court. See Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80

- 82, 109 S. Ct. 346, 102 L. Ed.2d 300 (1988) (holding that a motion to withdraw should not be ruled on before appellate court independently reviews the record to determine whether counsel’s evaluation that the appeal is frivolous is sound); Schulman v. State , 252 S.W.3d 403, 410

- 11 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (same); see also Kelly , 2014 WL 2865901 (appointed counsel’s duties of representation do not cease when he files a motion to withdraw; counsel must continue to ‘act with competence,
commitment and dedication to the interest of the client’ until the c ourt of appeals grants the motion). Accordingly, no new attorney will be appointed for him at this time.

We further order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on appellant, his counsel, the attorney for the State, and the clerk of the trial court.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITN ESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 5th day of August, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle
Clerk of Court
Joe CLOPTON, Petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-9134

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
H. J. Res. 129 

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

Joint Resolution 

Appointing the day for the convening of the first session of the One Hundred 

Fourteenth Congress. 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That the first 

regular session of the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress shall 

begin at noon on Tuesday, January 6, 2015. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Fermin GUERRERO, Petitioner v. Martin BITER, Warden.

No. 18-9409

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Independent Auditors' Consent



To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
the Smith Barney Equity Funds:

We consent to the use of our report dated March 14, 
1997, with respect to the Concert Social Awareness 
Fund (formerly, Smith Barney Strategic Investors 
Fund), incorporated herein by reference and to the 
references to our Firm under the heading "Financial 
Highlights" in the Supplement dated May 30, 1997 to 
the Prospectus dated February 24, 1997.




KPMG 
Peat Marwick LLP


New York, New York
May 28, 1997
Exhibit
        32.1
 **CERTIFICATION
        OF PERIODIC REPORT**
  Pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Veridium
        Corporation (the “Company”), certifies that:
  1. The
        Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the nine months ended
        September 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
        Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
        78m or
        78o(d)); and
  2. The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 **VERIDIUM
        CORPORATION**
 
 
 By:
              /S/     
                  KEVIN E. KREISLERKEVIN
                  E. KREISLERChief
                  Executive OfficerDate:
              November
                  18,
                  2005By:
              /S/     
                  MICHAEL DESROSIERSMICHAEL
                  DESROSIERSChief
                  Financial OfficerDate:
              November
                  18,
                  2005
 
 This
        certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
        to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
        purpose.
Yasmeen DANIEL, Individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of Zina Daniel Haughton, Petitioner v. ARMSLIST, LLC, et al.

No. 19-153

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Wisconsin denied.
CACI PREMIER TECHNOLOGY, INC., Petitioner, v. Suhail Najim Abdulla AL SHIMARI, et al.

No. 19-648

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
# C_2018241EN.01000202.xml

| 10.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 241/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 241/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8916 — JIC/TAHL/Australia Nature’s Care Biotech)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 241/04)

On 3 July 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8916. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8916. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Corey MILLEDGE, Petitioner v. Gray ENGLISH, Assistant Warden.

No. 18-9175

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
IN RE Marcus SIMPSON, Petitioner

No. 19-6580

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1747

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 versus

$890,718.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY,

 Defendant,

 versus

CLAYTON WILLIS,

 Claimant - Appellant,

 and

TAMMY HARRELL,

Claimant.

No. 06-1748

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 versus
- 2 -

PROPERTY, 475 COTTAGE DR, MOUNT AIRY, SURRY

COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA,

 Defendant,

 versus

CLAYTON WILLIS,

 Claimant - Appellant,

and

CAROL MIDKIFF MILLS,

Claimant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr.,

District Judge. (1:03-cv-00263-JAB; 1:02-cv-00898-JAB)

Submitted: January 8, 2007 Decided: February 6, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clayton Willis, Appellant Pro Se. Gill Paul Beck, Lynne P. Klauer,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
*Although Willis asserts he has had no response to his request

to proceed on appeal without payment of fees, we observe that the

district court previously accorded Willis in forma pauperis status,

and these appeals have proceeded on that basis.

- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Clayton Willis appeals the

district court’s orders forfeiting real property and currency to

the Government. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Willis, Nos. 1:03-cv-00263-JAB;

1:02-cv-00898-JAB (M.D.N.C. filed May 25, 2006 & entered May 26,

2006). We deny Willis’ requests for appointment of counsel.*

 We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Henry H. Graham, Jr., certify that:

 

1.            I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TNS, Inc.;

 

2.            Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.            The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and have:

 

a.            Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b.            Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c.            Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.            The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a.            All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonable likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b.            Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

DATE: November 14, 2005

 
| /s/ Henry H. Graham, Jr.                                           |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Henry H. Graham, Jr.                                               |
| Executive Vice President, Chief Financial  Officer & Treasurer |

 

----
# Official Journal C 153/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 153 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6429 April 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 153

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6429 April 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 153/01 | Communication from the Commission – Guidelines on regional State aid | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 153/01

Communication from the Commission – Guidelines on regional State aid

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Independent Auditors' Consent




To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Smith Barney Oregon Municipals Fund:
We consent to the incorporation by reference, in this
Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information, of
our report dated June 12, 2000, on the statement of
assets and liabilities for the Smith Barney Oregon
Municipals Fund (the "Fund") as of April 30, 2000 and
the related statements of operations for the year then
ended, the statements of changes in net assets for
each of the years in the two-year period then ended
and the financial highlights for each of the years in
the five-year period then ended.  These financial
statements and financial highlights and our report
thereon are included in the Annual Report of the Fund
as filed on Form N-30D.
We also consent to the references to our firm under
the headings "Financial Highlights" in the Prospectus
and "Auditors" in the Statement of Additional
Information.



K
PMG
LLP
New York, New York
August 23, 2000
Page
| (logo) WELLS

            FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Poolingand Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2018, by and among GS MORTGAGESECURITIES CORPORATION II, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as SpecialServicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator,WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee and PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCELLC, as Operating Advisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer with respect toCommercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2018-GS9 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, ManagingDirector of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.           A reviewof the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from March 1, 2018through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance perthe Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2.           To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary 2019.

 

 

/s/ Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector 

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
# L_2023173EN.01004401.xml

| 6.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 173/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 173/44

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 141/2020

has been withdrawn and therefore left blank

---
**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| 1.     | Such                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September                30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                     |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
| 2.     | The                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for                the period ending September 30, 2006, fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                BTX Holdings, Inc. |

| Dated:                November 14, 2006 |
|-----------------------------------------|

**BTX      HOLDINGS, INC.**

| By: | */s/                Scott J. Silverman*Chief                Executive Officer and Chief                Financial Officer |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 2, 2023

No. 04-22-00875-CR

The STATE of Texas,

Appellant

v.

Bryan Javier RAMIREZ ALEJO,

Appellee

From the County Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13760CR

Honorable Dennis Powell, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Pursuant to article 44.01(a)(1) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the State has 

filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s order quashing the information. See TEX. CODE 

CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.01(a)(1). In its notice of appeal, it requests that this court stay the 

proceedings in the trial court pending this appeal pursuant to article 44.01(e). See id. art. 44.01(e) 

(providing that “[t]her State is entitled to a stay in the proceedings pending the disposition of an 

appeal under Subsection (a) or (b) of this article”). We GRANT the State’s motion to stay and 

stay all proceedings in the trial court pending the disposition of this appeal. 

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of February, 2023.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Exhibit
31.1





CERTIFICATIONS





I,
Dennis C. Murphy, certify that:





1.   I
have reviewed the report being filed on Form 10-QSB by Green Energy Holding
Corp.;





2.   Based
on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by the report;





3.   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in the report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of Green Energy Holding Corp. as
of, and for, the periods presented  in the report;





4.   I
and the other certifying officer are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in
Regulation 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) for Green Energy
Holding Corp. and have:





i.   Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that  material
information relating to Green Energy Holding Corp. including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within  those entities,
particularly during the  period in which the periodic reports are
being prepared;





ii.  Evaluated
the effectiveness of Green Energy Holding Corp.'s disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of the
report ("Evaluation Date"); and





iii.
Presented in the report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;





5.   I
and the other certifying officer have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, to the Green Energy Holding Corp. auditors and the audit committee
of the board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent
function):





i.   All
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect Green Energy Holding Corp.'s  ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified Green
Energy Holding Corp.'s auditors any material weaknesses in internal
controls; and





ii.  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the issuer's internal controls; and





6.   I
and the other certifying officer have indicated in the report whether or not
there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that
could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Date: May
13, 2008


/s/ Dennis C. Murphy


Dennis C. Murphy, Chief Executive Officer
Tamra L. LAMPRELL, Petitioner v. Rex E. STUCKEY

No. 19-577

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New Mexico denied.