alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                     151,902,271
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  403,376
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           152,305,647
<PP&E>                                       9,143,511
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,059,601)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             160,389,557
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,178,877
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     29,954
<COMMON>                                       970,497
<OTHER-SE>                                 156,210,229
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               160,389,557
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (3,082,822)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (1,084,861)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,167,682)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (800)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,168,482)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,168,482)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 290/2018

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 290 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6117 August 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 290

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6117 August 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 290/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8924 — HgCapital/TA Associates/Access) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2018/C 290/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8961 — HPS/MDP/PFP) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2018/C 290/03 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9033 — Clearlake Capital Group/Vista/Eagleview Technology Corporation) (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| 2018/C 290/04 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9018 — Cerberus Group/WFS Global Holding) (
  1
  ) | 2 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 290/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8924 — HgCapital/TA Associates/Access) (
  1
  )

1

1

2018/C 290/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8961 — HPS/MDP/PFP) (
  1
  )

1

1

2018/C 290/03

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9033 — Clearlake Capital Group/Vista/Eagleview Technology Corporation) (
  1
  )

1

2

2018/C 290/04

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9018 — Cerberus Group/WFS Global Holding) (
  1
  )

1

2

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 290/05 | Euro exchange rates | 3 |
| 2018/C 290/06 | Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006)
   (
  1
  ) | 4 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 290/05

Euro exchange rates

3

2018/C 290/06

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006)
   (
  1
  )

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006)

1

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 VIASPACE INC.
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 June 30, 2006
 1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 Date: August 11, 2006
    
    /s/ CARL KUKKONENCarl KukkonenChief Executive OfficerDate: August 11, 2006
    
    /s/ STEPHEN J. MUZIStephen J. MuziChief Financial Officer
Michael SHAVERS, Petitioner v. Lavern SHARP, Deputy Warden, et al.

No. 19-6342

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

** **

**World Omni Financial Corp.**

**Servicer Compliance Statement**

**Pursuant to Item 1123**

**of Regulation AB**

** **

I, Joseph A. Venezia,do hereby certify that I am the Chief Financial Officer of World Omni Financial Corp., a Florida corporation, and further certifyon behalf of World Omni Financial Corp. in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement,dated as of February 7, 2018 (the “Agreement”), among World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2018-A, as Issuing Entity,World Omni Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor, and the Servicer, as follows:

 

(i)       Areview of the activities of the Servicer during the period covered by the issuing entity’s Annual Report on form 10-K forthe fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance under the Agreement, has beenmade under my supervision.

 

(ii)       Tothe best of my knowledge, based on the review described above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreementin all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereuntoset my hand as of March 8, 2019.
SIH PARTNERS LLLP, Explorer Corporation, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

No. 19-435

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 20160 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
SALVADOR JUAREZ

- URIBE, also known as Jaime Pineda Diaz, also known as Salvador Juarez Uribe , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:13

- CR

- 243

- 1

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Salvador Juarez

Uribe has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Juarez

- Uribe h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 4, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-20160 Document: 00512825483 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/04/2014No. 14

- 20160

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for ap pellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 14-20160 Document: 00512825483 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/04/2014
# C_2018057EN.01000201.xml

| 15.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 57/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 57/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8756 — Avis Budget Group/KOC Holding/Olympic Commercial and Tourist Enterprises)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 57/03)

On 7 February 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8756. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8756. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Report of Independent Accountants


To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Municipal Partners Fund II Inc.


In planning and performing our audit of the financial
statements of Municipal Partners Fund II Inc., (hereafter
referred to as the Fund) for the year ended June 30, 2001, we
considered its internal control, including control activities
for safeguarding securities, in order to determine our auditing
procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the
financial statements and to comply with the requirements of
Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this
responsibility, estimates and judgments by management are
required to assess the expected benefits and related costs of
controls.  Generally, controls that are relevant to an audit
pertain to the entity's objective of preparing financial
statements for external purposes that are fairly presented in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
Those controls include the safeguarding of assets against
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or
fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any
evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to
the risk that it may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or that the effectiveness of their design and
operation may deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in internal control that might be material
weaknesses under standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness
is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more
of the internal control components does not reduce to a
relatively low level the risk that misstatements caused by
error or fraud in amounts that would be material in relation to
the financial statements being audited may occur and not be
detected within a timely period by employees in the normal
course of performing their assigned functions.  However, we
noted no matters involving internal control and its operation,



including controls for safeguarding securities, that we
consider to be material weaknesses as defined above as of June
30, 2001.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management and the Board of Directors of the Fund and the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not intended to be
and should not be used by anyone other than these specified
parties.




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

August 16, 2001
# Official Journal L 364/9 De

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 364 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 479 December 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 364

English edition

Legislation

Volume 479 December 2004

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | European Parliament |
| | * | Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 2004 on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws (the Regulation on consumer protection cooperation) (1) | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

European Parliament

*

Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 2004 on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws (the Regulation on consumer protection cooperation) (1)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7699

JOSHUA CARTER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ALFRED M. TRIPP, Lawyer, Court Appointee;

CHARLES D. GRIFFITH, JR., Judge,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District

Judge. (CA-01-1387-AM)

Submitted: January 17, 2002 Decided: January 29, 2002

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joshua Carter, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Joshua Carter appeals from the district’s court order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001) complaint

without prejudice because he failed to exhaust available state

court remedies. Because Carter may refile this action after

exhausting state remedies, his appeal is interlocutory and not

subject to appellate review under Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar

Workers Local 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a

certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 45 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 45

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 granting Congress the authority to enact laws limiting the number of 
           terms that Representatives and Senators may serve.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 14, 2013

Mr. Bridenstine (for himself and Mr. O'Rourke) introduced the following 
 joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 granting Congress the authority to enact laws limiting the number of 
           terms that Representatives and Senators may serve.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Congress may by law limit the number of terms that 
Representatives and Senators may serve.''.
                                 <all>
```
Alexander William JOHNSON, Petitioner v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

No. 19-6106

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

### **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS REQUIRED BY**

# **SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

# ** **

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof Steinway Musical Instruments, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscalperiod ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dennis M. Hanson, SeniorExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifythat to the best of my knowledge:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Dennis M. Hanson                 |
|--------|--------------------------------------|
|   |                                 |
|   | Senior Executive Vice  President and |
|   | Chief Financial Officer              |
|   | (Principal Financial  Officer)       |

 

 

May 10, 2010

 

----
## /VL0 **h l**  

## c//\ 

# �o **Su_s17l;vi/111d(�k kle.s** 

**- 5 v(l�**  **Lcvvl }/1/\cJ**  

## v"-LS **�}� !!&vr f** 

**- -**  

# fv

**cUv** 

## L 

# le **v** 

## U__r **/** 

## v 

# rs u **fl_/C,,f** 

# ro **cf: If.A,/,**

**�**

**1** 

# s **v(l�y'** 

## ( �

**/L** 

## d_ **[** 

# '-s 0t_:f� **f** 

### 1-e_j **JAf2** 

## t 

# y **) L**

**.,._.,__ ..** 

# +1� **f �** 

### [CA--1/t./ 

## //� **(et** 

### Y/ 

## �/td **(i/ (**  **� /f- � L4._.f**  **OJ\ C0** 

## /l/lv /- **�t;;-e_ czJvLi**  

## Ct//(



# fl� **t1Le__s /Lf_C,<!_S5C'\(/-4YA,'s**  

## 6r,'e._l



# 5 **u(l0u** 

# I

**vJ'v** 

# l **jJ** 

# t'yJ **t?.w3 Io**  **,n f** 



# �s **u** 

# I **Ve 1 _**  **s** 

# o **!!,fJ °'- 1, c;, /'-_ &** 

# f' 

# °' 

# If **1.** 

# IC.AP.

**(c v _e_,3-**  

## fu t 1'h- ts **t:l/ £**  **�/,**

**. .** 



# '/2-Ls; **17 {!_L,-**  **u** 

# I�� **/1/1_ c**  

# '¥4

**1** 

# /lrv\_ **��� [jJ'-/t**  

# h' **c.' t>i_,f-e**  

# tJ/1 **0v**

**1 c:_1L**  

## fr **/e_NLc,** 

## {d **_{vfA-U' �l**  **L do kA7 dLdtY'-L**



# fz� f-

**CX-A-** 

### 11� **�μ_ fv.v:f__/L** 

**= i//_e_2_**  

## /J.e[v�

**!\_** 

# N **c/ -c ld**



# r, **;/** 

# o **f {l---L**  **fv**



## r 

# 0 **(!) 1**  **Vl-j /1-1.__rJ h** 

## M

**� Vl.**  

# 5 **-<2 �** 

### f fu Jk�(lv(f **r\-0.-v � �·** 

### j_

**f) L**  **>** 

### fc /?_IV'--J I__ **c--'-V\/,,A** 

## f **cA._0 [ {J �**  

# le; **Lz (1L,;-f/<Jj**  

## T f , G I 5 Y b V f, **r ff**  

## c **{cJ:S** 

## . t/J � **oi_ 1**  

# 1/ **/. /.**

**/ Iv**  **_>**



## 1 **5 L**  

## /N__ **;1°'- > J, 'i (:Z**  **>/I°! /4,t_ �** 

**1**1I?cvtitct,[;lSv~!~l:.FtGAh-5vcOOK/<_~"'--5L,YL,>.M'',.·..,;IJ=,,.-.........-·~--~f\'~:'}";.~~''}"''··'~,.·:'·=~~=...~-.--'"'"''=~.._~·Dec°'--fv'fr1JC/623'--/W.C.S.O.JailInmateMail....~...-,,••CT).,,•.-.2$.?IPR;,i·,-::.::.RECEIVE·."'°';;,...COURTOFAPP£A?s.LJSABarnSwallowMAYO 12019USAMATZCLERK,5thDISTIUCTFf-ffi.rour1-t)f'Af/t.qtrfOC){0/V\j'VL17_.:(CL1t";zt){')}---t,5o._,(">52Q'1~3~(qJ/Z:!11.,,,11,111~~.Q1,w2~
Amendment Number One



 Exhibit 10.38(xii) 
  
 AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE 
 TO THE 
 GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION 
 LONG-TERM APPRECIATION PLAN 
  
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 8.1 of the Georgia-Pacific Long-Term Appreciation Plan (the “Plan”), the Company has the right to amend the Plan; and 
  
 WHEREAS, at its January 31, 2003 meeting, the Board delegated to its
Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) the authority to approve amendments to the Plan as necessary or appropriate to effectuate a program to offer employees an opportunity to exchange outstanding SARs under the Plan for a lesser number
of SARs at a more favorable Grant Value, for the purpose of motivating and retaining employees; 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Committee hereby amends the Plan as follows, subject to and effective as of the date of shareholder approval: 
  
 1. Section 8(b) of the Plan is amended to read as follows: 
  
 “(b) SARs Previously Granted. At any time and from time to time,
the Company may amend, modify or terminate any outstanding SAR without approval of the Participant; provided, however, that no such amendment, modification or termination shall, without the Participant’s consent, reduce the number of SAR Units
or increase the Grant Value for any SAR Units except as provided in Section 6(i) and Section 9. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company may effect a one-time exchange offer to be commenced in the discretion of the Company no sooner than May 6,
2003 and no later than the 2004 annual meeting of the Company’s shareholders, upon the terms and conditions described in the Company’s proxy statement for the 2003 annual meeting of the Company’s shareholders and in a Schedule TO to
be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about May 6, 2003, as the same may be amended.”