alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Peter B. CHIAFALO, Levi Jennet Guerra, and Esther Virginia John, Petitioners v. WASHINGTON

No. 19-465

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petitioner in No. 19-465 and respondent in No. 19-518 shall file opening and reply *954briefs on the merits under the schedule set forth in Rules 25.1 and 25.3. Respondent in No. 19-465 and petitioner in No. 19-518 shall file response briefs on the merits under the schedule set forth in Rule 25.2.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 97-3782EA

_____________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

*

v. *

*

Royce Kelvin Sanders, *

*

Appellant. *

Appeals from the United States

_____________ District Court for the Eastern

District of Arkansas.

No. 97-3856EA

_____________ [UNPUBLISHED]

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

*

v. *

*

Ronnie Joe Benson, *

*

Appellant. *

_____________

 Submitted: September 21, 1998

Filed: November 16, 1998

_____________
-2-

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD,

Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

The Government tried Royce Kelvin Sanders and Ronnie Joe Benson together

for their participation in a large-scale drug operation. A jury convicted Sanders and

Benson of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and related crimes.

We affirm.

Sanders contends the district court improperly denied his motion for severance.

Based on our review, we find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s ruling. The

Government compartmentalized its evidence against each defendant and the district

court gave opening and closing instructions informing the jury to decide each

defendant’s case “solely on the evidence that applies to him.”

Next, Benson raises several contentions related to the sufficiency of the

indictment and of the evidence supporting his conviction. We reject these contentions.

First, the record contains substantial evidence on which the jury reasonably could have

found Benson guilty of the charges. Second, the district court did not abuse its

discretion in denying Benson’s motion for severance. Third, Benson’s assertions

related to the sufficiency of the indictment and the evidence the Government presented

to the grand jury and offered at trial are without legal merit. Finally, Benson also raises

an argument about his sentence. We reject this argument as well. The district court’s

factual findings about Benson’s obstruction of justice and the quantity and identity of

drugs involved are not clearly erroneous. The probation officer properly based his

assessments on the trial testimony and the district court correctly determined Benson’s

guidelines sentence. We further conclude the additional pro se arguments on appeal

are either foreclosed by the holdings of this Court, otherwise without legal merit, or

both.
-3-

We thus affirm Sanders’s and Benson’s convictions and Benson’s sentence.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
----

(2004/C 84 E/0662)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0423/04

by Ilda Figueiredo (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(17 February 2004)

Subject:   Closure of the Brax factory in Portugal

Brax Portuguesa, clothes-making factory, Ltd., situated in Serzedo, Vila Nova de Gaia, has just closed its doors, throwing 450 workers on the dole. The Brax multinational, funded by German capital, has already opened new factories in Romania and other candidate countries. The documentation which was handed out to the Portuguese workers reveal that the company states that it has not paid salaries for the last two months, and does not intend to pay them in subsequent months. It should be noted that the company used Portuguese workers from Brax Portuguesa to train Romanian workers. Now it is sacking the former, quite illegally and unacceptably, although it is retaining the factory building and other significant property next to the factory. Brax Portuguesa obtained Community funding, and will undoubtedly continue to do so in Romania and elsewhere.

The Commission:

Answer given by Mr Dimas on behalf of the Commission

(16 April 2004)

The Commission informs the Honourable Member that the provisions in force with regard to the obligations of enterprises which have benefited from Community funding are as follows:

----

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 4253/88 of 19 December 1988, laying down provisions for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 2052/88 as regards coordination of the activities of the different Structural Funds between themselves and with the operations of the European Investment Bank and the other existing financial instruments, OJ L 374, 31.12.1988.

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of BC Partners Lending Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward Gilpin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Date: March 5, 2020

 

|                         |
|-------------------------|
| /s/ Edward Gilpin       |
| Edward Gilpin           |
| Chief Financial Officer |
In the MATTER OF Disbarment of Ephraim Chukwuemeka UGWUONYE.

No. D-3046

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Disbarment order entered.
SMITH BARNEY MUNICIPALS FUND, INC.
                          10F-3 REPORT
              May 1, 1997 through October 31, 1997
                                


               Trade                                   Purchase
% of
Issuer              Date      Selling Dealer      Amount
Price          Issue

Pennsylvania Turnpike    8/6/98         Raymond James
$500,000  $93.261        1.07%
5.00% due 12/1/2027

Connecticut G.O.         10/29/98       Roosevelt & Cross
1,000,000 105.440        0.86
5.25% due 10/15/2013
EXHIBIT 35.1



World Omni Financial Corp.

Servicer Compliance Statement

Pursuant to Item 1123

of Regulation AB



I, Joseph A. Venezia, do hereby certify that I am the Chief Financial Officer of World Omni Financial
Corp., a Florida corporation, and further certify on behalf of World Omni Financial Corp. in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer”)
under the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement 2018-A to Closed-End Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 14, 2018 (the “Exchange
Note Servicing Supplement”), among AL Holding Corp., as Closed-End Collateral Agent, World Omni LT, as Titling Trust, and
the Servicer, as follows:



(i)        A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period covered by the issuing entity’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K and covered by the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement and the Closed-End Servicing Agreement (as defined in
the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of
its performance under the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement and the Closed-End Servicing Agreement (as defined in the Exchange
Note Servicing Supplement), has been made under my supervision.



(ii)       To the best of my knowledge, based on the review described above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its
obligations under the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement and the Closed-End Servicing Agreement (as defined in the Exchange Note
Servicing Supplement) in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto
set my hand as of March 8, 2019.



| | WORLD OMNI FINANCIAL CORP.
| | --------------------------



| | By: | /s/ Joseph A. Venezia         
| | --- | ------------------------------
| |     | Name: Joseph A. Venezia       
| |     | Title: Chief Financial Officer
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 4.1    
    


        NES RENTALS HOLDINGS, INC.  



	NUMBER	 	 	 	SHARES
	NES	 	 	 	 
	
COMMON	
 	

 	
 	
COMMON
	
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS

OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE	
 	

 	
 	

 
	

THIS CERTIFICATE IS TRANSFERABLE IN

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS AND NEW YORK, NEW YORK	 	 	 	SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
 CUSIP 640820 10 6





This Certifies that






 


is
the owner of 


FULLY PAID AND NONASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $.01 PER SHARE, OF 





 


NES Rentals Holdings, Inc. transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney upon
surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. 


[ILLEGIBLE] 


CERTIFICATE OF STOCK  


COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED:

    LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,

      TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR

By:

                    AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE 


[ILLEGIBLE]

SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 




[ILLEGIBLE]

SECRETARY 









QuickLinks



Exhibit 4.1
# C_2006048EN.01001002.xml

| 25.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/10

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 15 December 2005

in Case C-144/05: Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2002/59/EC - Failure to transpose within the period prescribed)

(2006/C 48/20)

Language of the case: Dutch

In Case C-144/05 Commission of the European Communities (Agents: K. Simonsson and W. Wils) v Kingdom of Belgium (Agent: M. Wimmer) — ACTION for a declaration of failure to fulfil obligations pursuant to Article 226 EC, brought on 30 March 2005– the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of J. Makarczyk, President of the Chamber, R. Silva de Lapuerta and J. Klučka (Rapporteur), Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 15 December 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt within the period prescribed the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2002 establishing a Community vessel traffic monitoring and information system and repealing Council Directive 93/75/EEC, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that Directive. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt within the period prescribed the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2002 establishing a Community vessel traffic monitoring and information system and repealing Council Directive 93/75/EEC, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that Directive.

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 143, 11.6.2005.

1

---
Chad M. CUTLER, Petitioner v. ILLINOIS

No. 19-6150

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for rehearing denied.
Eulos Ceasar KNIGHT, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5262

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 117 (Friday, June 17, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 36500]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13160]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, June 21, 2022.

PLACE: The meeting is open to the public. Out of an abundance of 
caution related to current and potential coronavirus developments, the 
public's means to observe this Board meeting will be via a Webcast live 
on the internet and subsequently made available on-demand approximately 
one week after the event. Visit https://youtu.be/JJvLk_B7HzQ to view 
the meeting. If you need any technical assistance, please visit our 
Video Help page at: https://www.fdic.gov/video.html.
    Observers requiring auxiliary aids (e.g., sign language 
interpretation) for this meeting should call 703-562-2404 (Voice) or 
703-649-4354 (Video Phone) to make necessary arrangements.

STATUS: Open.

MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED: Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government 
in the Sunshine Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that the 
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's Board of Directors will meet in 
open session to consider the following matters:

Summary Agenda

    No substantive discussion of the following items is anticipated. 
These matters will be resolved with a single vote unless a member of 
the Board of Directors requests that an item be moved to the discussion 
agenda.
    Disposition of Minutes of a Board of Directors' Meeting Previously 
Distributed.
    Summary reports, status reports, and reports of actions taken 
pursuant to authority delegated by the Board of Directors.

Discussion Agenda

    Briefing re: Restoration Plan Semiannual Update and Amended 
Restoration Plan.
    Memorandum and resolution re: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on 
Assessments, Revised Deposit Insurance Assessment Rates.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Requests for further information 
concerning the meeting may be directed to Debra A. Decker, Executive 
Secretary of the Corporation, at 202-898-8748.

    Dated at Washington, DC, on June 14, 2022.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
James P. Sheesley,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-13160 Filed 6-15-22; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-1492

In Re: RANDY COOPER, 

 Petitioner. 

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (2:09-cv-00168) 

Submitted: October 21, 2009 Decided: November 2, 2009 

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. 

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Randy Cooper, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Randy Cooper petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking 

an order directing state correctional officials to protect him 

from assaults and harassment and obey the law We conclude that 

Cooper is not entitled to mandamus relief. 

Mandamus is a drastic remedy and should be used only 

in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. 

Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. Moussaoui, 333 

F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is 

available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the 

relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 

135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). This court does not have jurisdiction 

to grant mandamus relief against state officials. Gurley v. 

Superior Court of Mecklenburg County, 411 F.2d 586, 587 (4th 

Cir. 1969). 

The relief sought by Cooper is not available by way of 

mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
# C_2018128EN.01000301.xml

| 11.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/3

---

Commission notice on Community guides to good practice

(2018/C 128/03)

In accordance with the outcome of the assessment carried out at the meeting of 5-7 February 2018, the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed agreed on the publication of the title and references of the Community guide to good practice for the manufacture of safe pet foods, pursuant to Article 22 of Regulation (EC) No 183/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 January 2005 laying down requirements for feed hygiene (1):

1

Title
  : Community guide to good practice for the manufacture of safe pet foods

Title

Author
  : FEDIAF — European Pet Food Industry Federation

Author

Reference
  : Version 15. September 2017

Reference

http://ec.europa.eu/food/safety/animal-feed/feed-hygiene/guides-good-practice/index_en.htm

---

(1)  OJ L 35, 8.2.2005, p. 1.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 116 (Thursday, June 16, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36345-36346]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13017]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Office of Justice Programs

[OJP (BJA) Docket No. 1801]


Meeting of the Public Safety Officer Medal of Valor Review Board

AGENCY: Office of Justice Programs (OJP), Bureau of Justice Assistance 
(BJA), DOJ.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an announcement of a meeting (via WebEx/conference 
call-in) of the Public Safety Officer Medal of Valor Review Board to 
cover a range of issues of importance to the Board, to include but not 
limited to: Membership/terms; nomination eligibility; pending 2021-2022 
nominations; program marketing and outreach.

DATES: July 18, 2022, 1:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. EDT.

ADDRESSES: This meeting will be held virtually using web conferencing 
technology. The public may hear the proceedings of this virtual 
meeting/conference call by registering at last seven (7) days in 
advance with Gregory Joy (contact information below).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory Joy, Policy Advisor, Bureau of 
Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, by telephone at (202) 
514-1369, toll free (866) 859-2687, or by email at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0d4a7f686a627f74236762744d787e696267236a627b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b5f2c7d0d2dac7cc9bdfdaccf5c0c6d1dadf9bd2dac3">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Public Safety Officer Medal of Valor 
Review Board carries out those advisory functions specified in 42 
U.S.C. 15202. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 15201, the President of the United 
States is authorized to award the Public Safety Officer Medal of Valor, 
the highest national award for valor by a public safety officer.
    This virtual meeting/conference call is open to the public to 
participate remotely. For security purposes, members of the public who 
wish to participate must register at least seven (7) days in advance of 
the meeting/conference call by contacting Mr. Joy.
    Access to the virtual meeting/conference call will not be allowed 
without prior registration. Please submit any comments or written 
statements for

[[Page 36346]]

consideration by the Review Board in writing at least seven (7) days in 
advance of the meeting date.

Gregory Joy,
Policy Advisor/Designated Federal Officer, Bureau of Justice 
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2022-13017 Filed 6-15-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
| (logo) WELLS

            FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**  D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

 

  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Poolingand Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2018, by and among BANC OF AMERICAMERRILL LYNCH COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General Master Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, ADIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General Special Servicer,NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A., as NCB Master Servicer and as NCB SpecialServicer, AEGON USA REALTY ADVISORS, LLC, as Fair Oaks Mall Special Servicer,WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator,WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, and PARK BRIDGE LENDERSERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer, withrespect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2018-BNK12(the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwisedefined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of thisAgreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Servicesdo hereby certify that:

 

1.             A review of the activities of the General Master Servicerduring the period from May 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “ReportingPeriod”),  and of its performance per the Agreement during such period hasbeen made under my supervision, and  

 

2.           To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the General Master Servicer,has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all materialrespects throughout the Reporting Period. 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo)  Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Darrell FREEZE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6644

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# C_2018007EN.01000902.xml

| 10.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/9

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2018/C 7/05)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 9.12.2017 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 9.12.2017 - 31.12.2017 |
| Member State | Germany |
| Stock or Group of stocks | COD/N1GL14 and related special conditions COD/GRL1 and COD/GRL2 |
| Species | Cod (Gadus morhua) |
| Zone | Greenland waters of NAFO 1F and Greenland waters of XIV |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 51/TQ127 |

Date and time of closure

9.12.2017

Duration

9.12.2017 - 31.12.2017

Member State

Germany

Stock or Group of stocks

COD/N1GL14 and related special conditions COD/GRL1 and COD/GRL2

Species

Cod (Gadus morhua)

Gadus morhua

Zone

Greenland waters of NAFO 1F and Greenland waters of XIV

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

51/TQ127

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---