alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NEW YORK REPUBLICAN STATE COMMITTEE, Petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.

No. 19-343

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE, LLC, Petitioner v. COWPASTURE RIVER PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION, et al.

No. 18-1587

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 14, 2020

Motion of the Solicitor General for divided argument granted.
Exhibit 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  each of the  undersigned  officers  of  GreenShift
Corporation (the "Company"), certifies that:

1.   The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10Q of the Company for the period ended June
     30, 2008 (the  "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or
     78o(d)); and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:   August 19, 2008        /S/           KEVIN KREISLER
                                ----------------------------
                                              KEVIN KREISLER
                                              Chief Executive Officer


                                /S/           EDWARD R. CARROLL
                                -------------------------------
                                              EDWARD R. CARROLL
                                              Chief Financial Officer


This  certification  is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,
subject  to the  knowledge  standard  contained  therein,  and not for any other
purpose.
EX-32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CEO
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In  connection  with the annual report of Azul Studios  International  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form  l0-QSB for the  quarter  ended  December  31,  2004,  James
Vandeberg,  Chief  Financial  Officer  hereby  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the SARBANES - OXLEY Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1. The quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

2. The information  contained in the quarterly  report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



Date: June 23, 2006
                              By:  James Vandeberg, Chief Financial Officer
                                   ---------------
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/06/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       66,176
COMMITMENTS
     825   13,573    2,211   63,040   50,232   66,076   66,016      100      160

CHANGES FROM 04/29/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -13,154)
    -342    1,758     -913  -11,999  -13,979  -13,254  -13,134      100      -20

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     1.2     20.5      3.3     95.3     75.9     99.8     99.8      0.2      0.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       33)
       2        9        5       15       20       21       30`

---

Updated May 9, 2014
Exhibit
10.1


 


Hemispherx
Biopharma, Inc.


2117
SW Highway 484


Ocala,
FL 34473


 


	 	July
    17, 2019


 


Maxim
Group LLC


405
Lexington Avenue


New
York, New York 10174


 


Re:
Termination of Equity Distribution Agreement by and between Hemispherx Biopharma, Inc. (the “Company”) and Maxim
Group LLC (“Maxim”) dated July 23, 2012, as subsequently amended (the “EDA”)


 


Dear
Sir or Madam:


 


Pursuant
to our discussions we have agreed to terminate the EDA. Accordingly, pursuant to Section 7(a) of the EDA, the Company hereby terminates
the EDA, effective as of the close of business today, July 17, 2019.


 


	 	Sincerely,
	 	 
	 	/s/
    Thomas     K. Equels
	 	Thomas
    K. Equels, CEO
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely for the purpose of
complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned in his capacity as an officer of Fremont Michigan InsuraCorp, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such
officers knowledge, that:



|1. | The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                                                                         
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 12, 2010 |  | /s/ Richard E. Dunning                                                                  
|                        |  | Richard E. Dunning, President and Chief Executive Officer                               
|                        | 
|Date: November 12, 2010 |  | /s/ Kevin G. Kaastra                                                                    
|                        |  | Kevin G. Kaastra, Vice President of Finance (principal financial and accounting officer)

The foregoing certifications are
being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing
of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.



36
EXHIBIT 32.1

                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Telewest Global, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in this
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: July 29, 2004

-------------------------
Barry R. Elson
Acting Chief Executive Officer
Catherine STOUFFER, et al., Petitioners v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY

No. 19-271

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

*388Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Eleventh District denied.
Courtney Omar BOYD, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6920

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 21, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Smith Barney Small Cap Growth Fund
Smith Barney Small Cap Value Fund

Sub-Item 77 D:

Pursuant to Rule 35d-1 under the Investment Company Act of
1940, as amended, the fund changed its investment policies
to invest, under normal conditions, at least 80% of its net
assets plus the amount of borrowings for investment purposes
in the types of securities suggested by its name.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000979480
<NAME> SMITH BARNEY SECTOR SERIES
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER>007
   <NAME>SMITH BARNEY GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY FUND

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              2 Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 OCT-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                      OCT-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>              6,361,730
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>             5,119,436
<RECEIVABLES>                        146,512
<ASSETS-OTHER>                             0
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                     212
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     5,266,160
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>               2,284
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                    0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                  0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                    2,284
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                            0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>           6,409,791
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                137,418
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                      0
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                  0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                (6,413)
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>              (67,872)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                   0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>          (1,242,360)
<NET-ASSETS>                       5,093,146
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                     10,016
<INTEREST-INCOME>                      1,220
<OTHER-INCOME>                             0
<EXPENSES-NET>                        17,649
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>               (6,413)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>             (67,872)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>         (1,242,360)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>             (1,316,645)
<EQUALIZATION>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                  0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                   0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                      0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>            8,937,999
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>       (2,528,208)
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                        0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>             5,093,146
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                    0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                  0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                    0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                 0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                  8,085
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                       92,510
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>               1,480,771
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                  11.40
<PER-SHARE-NII>                         0.01
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                 0.00
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                    0.00
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>               0.00
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                    0.00
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                     8.78
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                         1.50
[AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING]                     0
[AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE]                       0



</TABLE>
Daniel Luke MEIER, Petitioner v. Amanda M. BERGER, et al.;

No. 19-5285

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1091 

To implement equal protection under the 14th article of amendment to the 

Constitution for the right to life of each born and preborn human person. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 12, 2013 

Mr. JORDAN (for himself, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. BARR, Mr. 

COLE, Mr. PALAZZO, Mr. JONES, Mr. PEARCE, Mr. HALL, Mr. BROUN

of Georgia, Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. 

FINCHER, Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. BARTON, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, Mr. MICA, 

Mr. BURGESS, Mr. CARTER, Mrs. ELLMERS, Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, Mr. 

BRADY of Texas, Mr. WALBERG, Mr. FLEMING, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, 

Mr. GUTHRIE, Mr. GARRETT, Mrs. HARTZLER, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. 

FARENTHOLD, Mr. BOUSTANY, Mr. DENHAM, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. 

HUELSKAMP, Mr. ROGERS of Alabama, Mr. BARLETTA, Mr. 

SOUTHERLAND, Mr. NUNNELEE, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mrs. BLACK, Mr. 

KELLY, Mr. HUIZENGA of Michigan, Mr. POMPEO, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. 

SCHWEIKERT, Mr. CRAWFORD, Mr. WEBER of Texas, and Mr. LATTA) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To implement equal protection under the 14th article of 

amendment to the Constitution for the right to life of 

each born and preborn human person. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1091 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Life at Conception 

3 Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. RIGHT TO LIFE. 

5 To implement equal protection for the right to life 

6 of each born and preborn human person, and pursuant 

7 to the duty and authority of the Congress, including Con8 gress’ power under article I, section 8, to make necessary 

9 and proper laws, and Congress’ power under section 5 of 

10 the 14th article of amendment to the Constitution of the 

11 United States, the Congress hereby declares that the right 

12 to life guaranteed by the Constitution is vested in each 

13 human being. However, nothing in this Act shall be con14 strued to authorize the prosecution of any woman for the 

15 death of her unborn child. 

16 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 

17 For purposes of this Act: 

18 (1) HUMAN PERSON; HUMAN BEING.—The 

19 terms ‘‘human person’’ and ‘‘human being’’ include 

20 each and every member of the species homo sapiens 

21 at all stages of life, including the moment of fer22 tilization, cloning, or other moment at which an indi23 vidual member of the human species comes into 

24 being. 

25 (2) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ used in the 

26 14th article of amendment to the Constitution of the 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1091 IH

1 United States and other applicable provisions of the 

2 Constitution includes the District of Columbia, the 

3 Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and each other terri4 tory or possession of the United States. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.13

December 23, 2003


Mr. Michael Davitt
9800 Richmond Avenue
Suite 680
Houston, Texas  77042

Dear Mike:

This letter shall serve as a conditional offer of employment to you by Franklin
Bank S.S.B ("Franklin") and Franklin Bank Corp. This offer is conditional upon
the happening of the initial public offering of Franklin Bank Corp (the "IPO").
Thus, if you accept this offer and the IPO occurs, this letter agreement will
take effect and supersede the prior letter agreement between you and by Franklin
setting forth certain terms of your employment. If the IPO does not occur, this
letter will be null and void and of no force and effect.

The above referenced offer is as follows:

Position:           Managing Director - Commercial Lending

Salary & Bonus:     Your current salary is $150,000 per annum and you will
                    participate in Franklin's bonus program with a 2004 target
                    of $75,000.

Restricted Stock:   In connection with the IPO, you will receive shares of
                    restricted stock of Franklin Bank Corp. as set forth in a
                    separate restricted stock award agreement

Expenses:           You will receive annual allowances as follows: auto --
                    $8,000 and club dues $5,000.

Severance:          Generally, you will receive a severance of six months'
                    salary continuation, if terminated by Franklin without cause
                    prior to a change of control. However, after a change of
                    control, you will be provided with severance and other
                    benefits under a change of control employment agreement in
                    accordance with the terms of that agreement, which is
                    attached hereto.

Please note that at no point in time will this letter or the offer that it
memorializes, serve as or be construed to grant you, a guarantee of employment
for any period of time. You will be at all times an employee at will.
<PAGE>
Please also note that this offer, and the above particulars, are subject to
Franklin's policies, any Franklin Bank Corp. Board of Directors' resolution or
directive regarding the same and the approval of Franklin Bank Corp.'s Board of
Directors.

Please confirm your acceptance of this offer of employment by signing this
letter where indicated and returning the executed original to our offices.
Should you have any questions about this offer of employment or the company,
please call the company at the above phone number.

Very truly yours,


By:  ____________________________
Name:  Anthony J. Nocella
Title: Chief Executive Officer

ACCEPTED:

_____________________________________   Date:   _____________________
Michael Davitt
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

___________________ No. 00-20901 Summary Calendar

___________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus NHAN KHIEM TRAN, also known as Tony Tran, also known as Larry Tran, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CV-1686 USDC No. H-89-CR-135-2

-------------------- April 1, 2002 Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Nhan Khiem Tran (“Tran”), federal prisoner # 48684-079, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). Tran argues that the district court erred in determining that Dirks was authorized to sign his motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 as Tran’s authorized agent because Dirks does not qualify as Tran’s next friend. Even assuming that the district court erred when it determined thatNo. 00-20901 - 2 - Dirks was Tran’s agent,“[i]t is not enough that the granting of [Rule 60(b) relief] might have been permissible, or even warranted--denial must have been so unwarranted as to constitute an abuse of discretion.” Seven Elves, Inc. v. Eskenazi , 635 F.2d 396, 402 (5th Cir. 1981) . Tran did not demonstrate in his Rule 60(b) motion, nor does he show on appeal, that he was prejudiced in any particular way by Dirks signing Tran’s name to the motion. Thus, he fails to show that the district court’s denial of his Rule 60(b) motion was an abuse of discretion. Tran also argues that Judge Hughes should be recused from his case. This court will not address this argument because the COA was granted only on the issue discussed above. See Lackey v. Johnson , 116 F.3d 149, 151-152 (5th Cir. 1997). The motion to supplement the record is moot in light of the opinion. AFFIRMED.
Independent Auditors  Report


To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Smith Barney Allocation Series Inc.:

In planning and performing our audits of the financial statements
of the Smith Barney Allocation Series Inc. (the  Funds )
consisting of the Global, High Growth, Growth, Balanced,
Conservative, Income, Select High Growth, Select Growth and
Select Balanced Portfolios for the year ended January 31, 2003,
we considered their internal control, including control
activities for safeguarding securities, in order to determine our
auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on
the financial statements and to comply with the requirements of
Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on internal control.

The management of the Funds is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity s
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Those controls include the safeguarding of assets against
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, error or
fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any
evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to
the risk that it may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in internal control that might be material
weaknesses under standards established by the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness is a
condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the
internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low
level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in
amounts that would be material in relation to the financial
statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a
timely period by employees in the normal course of performing
their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters involving
internal control and its operation, including controls for
safeguarding securities, that we consider to be material
weaknesses as defined above as of January 31, 2003.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management and the Board of Directors of the Funds and the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not intended to be and
should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.



                                             KPMG LLP
New York, New York
March 12, 2003
Mary Katherine DAY-PETRANO, Petitioner v. Charles D. HALL, et al.

No. 19-5372

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

ALDER RUN, LLC

v.

RICHARD E. LUTZ, TRUSTEE, NANCY M. LUTZ, TRUSTEE RHCC, LLC, JAMES A. STRAWSER, LESTER H. STRAWSER, DANIEL D. STRAWSER, EARL T. STRAWSER, PALMER E. STRAWSER, AMOS T. STRAWSER, KEVIN O. STRAWSER, SHANE A. STRAWSER, KEITH A. STRAUSER, ELROY D. STRAUSER, JOSHUA E. STRAUSER, DALE E. GOODLING, ANTHONY L. PORTZLINE, TERRY L. ARNOLD, EDWARD P. VERES, JR., ANN F. VERES, RONALD R. SEILER, DEBORAH L. CARNS, GARETH O. WICK, AND

DURVIN Z. WICK

PETITION OF: RICHARD E. LUTZ,

TRUSTEE :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 78 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 6th day of August, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Independent Auditors' Consent



To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Adjustable Rate Government Income Fund:

We consent to the use of our report dated June 12, 1998 for Adjustable 
Rate Government Income Fund, incorporated herein by reference and to 
the references to our Firm under the headings "Financial Highlights" 
in the Prospectus and "Counsel and Auditors" in the Statement of 
Additional Information.




	KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


New York, New York
September 21, 1998
IN RE Craig Melvin SCHAFER, Petitioner;

No. 19-5721

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.