alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONS



I, Douglas P. Condie, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of STAT Software, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date:  November
12, 2004



/s/ Douglas P. Condie

President
Ijaz KHAN, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6760

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Jose Luis MAYA, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al.

No. 19-6867

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
TUAN DUC LAM, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5582

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
IN RE TCT MOBILE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, Petitioner.

No. 19M98

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus with the supplemental appendix under seal denied.
SMITH BARNEY NATURAL RESOURCES FUND, INC. 
(the "Fund") 
 
Supplement to Prospectus 
dated January 5, 1996 
 
 
 
 
For South Dakota investors: 
 
 
	CLASS Y SHARES OF THE FUND ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR PURCHASE BY 
RESIDENTS  
OF SOUTH DAKOTA. 
 
 
 
 
January 1, 1997 
 
 
 
FD#01254  

 


 
 
 
 
 
 
Smith Barney Natural Resources Fund Inc. 
388 Greenwich Street 
New York, NY 10013 
 
 
 
January 7, 1997 
 
 
Securities and Exchange Commission 
450 Fifth Street, NW 
Washington, DC 20549 
 
 
RE:	SMITH BARNEY NATURAL RESOURCES INC. ( the "Registrant") 
	FILE NO. 33-7339  
 
Dear Sirs: 
 
Pursuant to Rule 497(e) under the Securities Act of 1933, enclosed for 
filing  
on behalf of the Fund referenced above are EDGAR copies of a supplement 
to the  
Prospectus of the Registrant dated January 5, 1996. 
 
Please return an electronic receipt in order to verify receipt of this 
letter  
and filing. 
 
Very truly yours, 
 
 
 
/s/ Jacqueline Carr 
Jacqueline Carr 
 
 
cc:	(with enclosures)					Mr. Robert Garrett 
	Burton Leibert, Esq.				KPMG Peat Marwick LLP 
	Willkie Farr & Gallagher 
 
	Ms. Marie Ellen Costello				Mr. Michael 
McCarthy 
	Chase Manhattan Bank				First Data Investor 
Services  
Group Inc.
Nalen Pierre WILLIAMS, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6320

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 121 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 121

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a 5-year 
  reinstatement of the real property standard deduction and to adjust 
                     such deduction for inflation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2013

   Mr. Holt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a 5-year 
  reinstatement of the real property standard deduction and to adjust 
                     such deduction for inflation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REINSTATEMENT OF REAL PROPERTY STANDARD DEDUCTION.

    (a) Extension.--Subparagraph (C) of section 63(c)(1) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``in 2008 or 
2009'' and inserting ``after December 31, 2012, and before January 1, 
2018''.
    (b) Adjustments for Inflation.--
            (1) In general.--Subparagraph (B) of section 63(c)(4) of 
        such Code is amended--
                    (A) by inserting ``(2013 in the case of the dollar 
                amount contained in paragraph (7)(B))'' after ``1988'',
                    (B) by striking ``or (5)'' and inserting ``(5), or 
                (7)(B)'', and
                    (C) by striking ``and'' at the end of clause (i), 
                by striking the period at the end of clause (ii) and 
                inserting ``, and'', and by inserting after clause (ii) 
                the following:
                            ``(iii) `calendar year 2011' in the case of 
                        the dollar amount contained in paragraph 
                        (7)(B).''.
            (2) Conforming amendment.--Subparagraph (B) of section 
        63(c)(7) of such Code is amended by striking ``$1,000'' and 
        inserting ``twice such amount''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered January 31, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-00006-CV

No. 05-17-00007-CV

No. 05-17-00008-CV

IN RE NAZARIO CHAVEZ, JR., Relator

Original Proceedings from the Justice Court Precinct 1 Place 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. JT-15M8400H

ORDER

Before the Court are relator’s (1) objections to the Court’s January 11, 2017 opinions

dismissing these proceedings for want of jurisdiction and (2) “motion to transfer original 

documents and exhibits to court of appeals.” We construe relator’s objections as a motion for 

rehearing. TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1. Relator’s objections and motion indicate that he believes he has 

appealed a November 16, 2016 final judgment rendered by the Dallas County justice court, 

precinct 1 place 1. This Court does not have jurisdiction to hear appeals from the justice courts. 

TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 22.221(a), (b) (West Supp. 2014); see In re Pruitt, 05-11-01526-CV, 

2011 WL 5557539, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Nov. 16, 2011, no pet.). Further, there is no appeal 

pending in this Court regarding the judgment relator complains of, and we have no record of the 

filing of a notice of appeal. Accordingly, we deny the motion for rehearing and deny as moot 

relator’s “motion to transfer original documents and exhibits to court of appeals.” 
/s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK 

JUSTICE
351 U.S. 975, 76 S.Ct. 1041.

#### Eddie L. BURDIX, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America.

No. 784, Misc.

Supreme Court of the United States.

June 4, 1956.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Denied.
Michael A. GREEN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6859

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                               EXHIBIT 10.23.1

                                FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
                        CAMERON ASHLEY BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC.
                              1996 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN



    THIS AMENDMENT, made this 11th day of December, 1996, by CAMERON ASHLEY
BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC., a corporation organized and doing business under the
laws of the State of Georgia (the "Company").


                                W I T N E S S E T H :

    WHEREAS, on May 21, 1996, the Board of Directors of the Company approved
the adoption by the Company of the Cameron Ashley Building Products, Inc. 1996
Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan") subject to approval of the shareholders of the
Company;

    WHEREAS, the Company will submit the Plan to its shareholders at the annual
meeting of shareholders on March 4, 1997;

    WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan prior to submission to the
shareholders to allow for non-qualified stock options to be granted at a
discount to fair market value on the date of grant; 

    WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company approved such amendment at
its regular quarterly meeting on December 11, 1996;

    NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of December 11,
1996, as follows:

    1.   By substituting the following for Plan Section 3.2(a) OPTION PRICE,
subsection (i), as follows:

         "... (i) any non-qualified stock option shall be as set forth in the
applicable Stock Incentive Agreement, but in no event less than 25% OF THE Fair
Market Value of a share of Stock on the date such Option is granted; ...".

    Except as specifically amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force
and effect as prior to the adoption of this Amendment.

<PAGE>

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed on
the day and year first above written.

                      CAMERON ASHLEY BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC.


                      By:  /s/ RONALD R. ROSS
                          ----------------------------------------------------
                          Ronald R. Ross, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


ATTEST:
By  /s/ JOHN S. DAVIS
  --------------------------
    John S. Davis, Secretary


    [CORPORATE SEAL]

























                                         -2-
Zack Zafer DYAB, Petitioner, v. Nicole ENGLISH, Warden.

No. 19-5241

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of CEA Acquisition Corporation (the Company) on Form
10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Brad Gordon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. By:
    
    /s/ Brad Gordon
    
    
    
    Dated: May 12, 2005Brad GordonChief Financial Officer(Principal Accounting Officer)
Jennifer CASTRO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6826

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# Official Journal C 8/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 8 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5012 January 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 8

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5012 January 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Resolutions, recommendations, guidelines and opinions |
| | OPINIONS |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2007/C 008/01 | Opinion No 7/2006 on a proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) | 1 |
| 2007/C 008/02 | Opinion No 8/2006 concerning a proposal for a Council Regulation repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 2040/2000 on budgetary discipline | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Resolutions, recommendations, guidelines and opinions

OPINIONS

Court of Auditors

2007/C 008/01

Opinion No 7/2006 on a proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF)

1

2007/C 008/02

Opinion No 8/2006 concerning a proposal for a Council Regulation repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 2040/2000 on budgetary discipline

3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
SMITH BARNEY MONEY FUNDS, INC.

	CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION


	Smith Barney Money Funds, Inc., a Maryland corporation, having its 
principal office in Baltimore City, Maryland (hereinafter called the 
"Corporation"), hereby certifies to the State Department of Assessments 
and Taxation of Maryland that:

	FIRST: The title of the document being corrected is Articles 
Supplementary.
	
	SECOND: The name of the party to the document being corrected is 
Smith Barney Money Funds, Inc.

	THIRD:  The date that the document being corrected was filed is 
December 10, 1992.

	FOURTH: The following provision of the Articles Supplementary is 
hereby corrected as follows:

	ARTICLE SECOND (a) of the Articles Supplementary which now reads 
as follows:

	"(a) The Government Portfolio series of the Common Stock shall 
have three classes of shares, which shall be designated Class A, Class B 
and Class C, each consisting, until further changed, of the lesser of 
(x) 500,000,000 shares or (y) the number of shares that could be issued 
by issuing all of the shares of Common Stock of that series less the 
total number of shares of all classes of Common Stock of that series 
then issued and outstanding."

is corrected to read as follows:

	"(a) The Government Portfolio series of the Common Stock shall 
have three classes of shares, which shall be designated Class A, Class B 
and Class C, each consisting, until further changed, of the lesser of 
(x) 2,000,000,000 shares or (y) the number of shares that could be 
issued by issuing all of the shares of Common Stock of that series less 
the total number of shares of all classes of Common Stock of that series 
then issued and outstanding."	 

	FIFTH: The execution of the Articles Supplementary was not 
defective.

	IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Smith Barney Money Funds, Inc. has caused 
these presents to be signed in its name and on its behalf by its 
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and witnessed by its 
Secretary on this     July 15, 1994.

Witness:					SMITH BARNEY MONEY FUNDS, INC.


/s/ Christina T. Sydor				By: /s/ Stephen J.Treadway
Christina T. Sydor		    			Stephen J. Treadway
Secretary			    			Chairman of the Board
						and Chief Executive Officer	

	THE UNDERSIGNED, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive 
Officer of Smith Barney Money Funds, Inc. who executed on behalf of the 
Corporation the foregoing Certificate of Correction, hereby acknowledges 
in the name and on behalf of the Corporation the foregoing Certificate 
of Correction to be the corporate act of  said Corporation and hereby 
certifies that the matters and facts set forth herein are true in all 
material respects under the penalties of perjury.


							/s/ Stephen J. Treadway
							Stephen J. Treadway
							Chairman of the Board
							and Chief Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 21, 2009

p1214 

# Order

December 21, 2009

139576

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139576 COA: 282172 Berrien CC: 1987-001308-FH ANTHONY LEE VANDURMEN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 14, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 31.a

I, John P. Manning, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund V L.P.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|November 21, 2005 | /s/ John P. Manning
|----------------- | -------------------
|                  | John P. Manning    
|                  | Principal          
|                  | Executive Officer  
|                  |                    
|                  |
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of K-Fed Bancorp (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kay M. Hoveland, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     2.   The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the company's financial condition and results of
          operations.


Date: May 5, 2004                                /s/ Kay M. Hoveland
      ---------------------                      -------------------------------
                                                 Kay M. Hoveland
                                                 Chief Executive Officer







                                       19
ALD-113 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 13-4614

___________

IN RE: DUMONT BUSH,

Petitioner

____________________________________

On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(Related to Crim. No. 2-95-cr-00407-006)

____________________________________

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

January 9, 2014

Before: RENDELL, FISHER and GREENAWAY, JR., Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: January 23, 2014)

_________

O P I N I O N

_________

PER CURIAM

On November 26, 2012, Dumont Bush filed a motion to correct clerical error 

pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36. On December 2, 2013, Bush filed the 

present petition for a writ of mandamus asking us to compel the District Court to rule 

upon that motion. The District Court entered an order denying Bush’s motion on 

December 12, 2013. Accordingly, we will deny the mandamus petition as moot.
Efrain J. ROSA, Petitioner v. R.L. RHODES, Warden

No. 19-6909

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 21, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.