alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
10F-3 REPORT

           SMITH BARNEY INVESTMENT FUNDS INC.
           SMITH BARNEY SMALL CAP VALUE FUND

      September 1, 2000 through November 30, 2000

                Trade                                     % of
Issuer          Date       Selling Dealer  Shares  Price  Issue(1)

AeroGen, Inc.   11/10/00   Chase H & Q     36,000  12.00  0.13%A

(1) Represents purchases by all affiliated funds; may not exceed
    25% of the principal amount of the offering.

A - Includes purchases of $18,000 by other SB Mutual Funds.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC.  PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  (CHAPTER 98, TITLE 15 U.S.C. SS. 7241)

I,
Steven J. Janusek, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13(a)-15(f) and
15(d)-15(f)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



Date:
May 5, 2008

|/s/STEVEN J. JANUSEKSteven J. Janusek, Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRENT K. POLLITT,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

CASA GRANDE UNION HIGH SCHOOL

DISTRICT NO. 82 ; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 15

- 16370

D.C. No. 4:13

- cv

- 00383

- RM

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona Rosemary Marquez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 18, 2017 **

Before: TROTT, TASHIMA, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Brent K. Pollitt appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his action alleging federal and state law claims relating to his termination . We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JAN 30 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 15

- 16370

dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6)

. Hebbe v. Pliler , 627

F.3d 338, 341 (9th Cir. 2010). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Pollitt’s claim under Arizona’s

blacklisting statute because Pollitt failed to allege facts sufficient to state a

plau sible claim. See Ariz. Rev. Stat. § § 23

- 1361 ( elements of blacklisting ) ; Hebbe

,

627 F.3d at 341

- 42 (to avoid dismissal, a complaint must contain sufficient factual

matter, accepted as true, to state a claim for relief that is plausible on its face). The

district court also properly dismissed Pollitt’s conspiracy to blacklist claim , alleged

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , because “a claim for violation of state law is not

cognizable under § 1983.” Corne j o v. County of San Diego , 504 F.3d 853, 855 n.3

(9th C ir. 2007).

The district court properly dismissed Pollitt’s remaining claims arising from

his termination because the state administrative proceedings had preclusive effect.

See Olson v. Morris , 188 F.3d 1083, 1086 (9th Cir. 1999) (“In Arizona, the failure

to seek judicial review of an administrative order precludes collateral attack of the

o rder in a separate complaint.”)

.3 15

- 16370

We do not consider matters raised for the first time on appeal. See Padgett

v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9t h Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
Timothy Edward HOLZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6379.

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                               G&L Realty Corp.
                             List of Subsidiaries
                                October 31, 2000

1.   G&L Hampden, Inc., a Delaware corporation
2.   G&L Hampden, LLC a Delaware limited liability company
3.   G&L Realty Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
4.   G&L Realty Financing II, Inc., a Delaware corporation
5.   G&L Realty Financing Partnership II, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
6.   G&L Medical, Inc., a Delaware corporation
7.   G&L Gardens, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company
8.   G&L Management Delaware Corp., a Delaware corporation
9.   G&L Senior Care, Inc., a Delaware corporation
10.  G&L Medical Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
11.  GLN Capital Co. LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
12.  GL/PHP, LLC a Delaware limited liability company
13.  Theme World, L.P., a New Jersey limited partnership
14.  435 N. Roxbury Drive, Ltd., a California limited partnership
15.  G&L - Grabel San Pedro, LLC
16.  G&L Burbank, LLC
17.  G&L Burbank Managers Corp., a California corporation
18.  G&L Holy Cross, LLC
19.  G&L Holy Cross Managers Corp., a California corporation
20.  G&L Tustin, LLC
21.  G&L Tustin Managers Corp., a California corporation
22.  G&L Valencia, LLC
23.  G&L Penasquitos, LLC
24.  G&L Penasquitos, Inc.
25.  GLH Pacific Gardens, LLC
27.  GLH Pacific Gardens Corp., a California corporation
28.  G&L Hoquiam, LLC
29.  G&L Lyon, LLC
30.  G&L Coronado (1998), LLC
31.  G&L Parsons on Eagle Run, LLC
32.  G&L Parsons on Eagle Run, Inc.
33.  Lakeview Associates, LLC
34.  Tustin Heritage Park, LLC
35.  G&L Heritage Care, LLC
36.  G&L Heritage Care, Inc.
37.  G&L Massachusetts, LLC
38.  G&L Aspen, LLC
Jason SIMON, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6256

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 12, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
VIA EDGAR



May 1, 1997


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

RE:	Smith Barney Money Funds, Inc.
	File Nos. 2-51301
		   811-2490

Dear Sirs:

Pursuant to Rule 497(j) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, please 
accept this letter as certification that each Prospectus and the Statement of 
Additional Information for the above-referenced fund (the Fund) does not 
differ from that contained in Post-Effective Amendment No. 49 to the Funds 
Registration Statement on Form N-1A, which was filed electronically on April 
23, 1997.  

Please return an electronic transmittal as evidence of your receipt of this 
filing.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Daria J. Szczur

Daria J. Szczur

Enclosures

cc:	(with enclosures)
	John E. Baumgardner, Jr., Esq.		Stephen Brunt
	Sullivan & Cromwell			Morgan Guaranty Trust Group

	Robert P. Garrett				Michael McCarthy 
	KPMg Peat Marwick LLP 		The Shareholder Services Group Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000920058
<NAME> SMITH BARNEY OREGON MUNICIPAL FUND - CLASS L

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                       34,460,213
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                      34,159,188
<RECEIVABLES>                                  607,164
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                       0
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,766,352
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                             0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                    1,298,580
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                          1,298,580
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                      0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                    34,531,533
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                          299,284
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                          290,558
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                       44,807
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                      (807,543)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                     (301,025)
<NET-ASSETS>                                33,467,772
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                                    0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                            2,115,616
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                                 412,260
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                      1,703,356
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                     (853,563)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                  (2,199,027)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                      (1,349,234)
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                      146,330
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                         5,509
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                         82,012
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                     85,135
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                             11,849
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                     (5,516,235)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                          1,019
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                       54,215
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                          180,578
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                                466,433
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                         3,355,945
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                            10.86
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                   0.46
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                         (0.84)
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                              0.45
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                         0.02
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                              0.00
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                              10.01
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                   1.39


</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 415/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 415 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6528 October 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 415

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6528 October 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| 2022/C 415/01 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Training Foundation for the financial year 2022 – amending budget No 1 | 1 |
| 2022/C 415/02 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control for the financial year 2022 – amending budget No 1 | 8 |
| 2022/C 415/03 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency for the financial year 2022 – amending budget No 1 | 13 |
| 2022/C 415/04 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority for the financial year 2022 – amending budget No 1 | 19 |
| 2022/C 415/05 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights for the financial year 2022 – amending budget No 2 | 25 |
| 2022/C 415/06 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Public Prosecutor's Office for the financial year 2022 – amending budget No 2 | 31 |
| 2022/C 415/07 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Public Prosecutor's Office for the financial year 2022 – amending budget No 3 | 36 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

2022/C 415/01

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Training Foundation for the financial year 2022 – amending budget No 1

1

2022/C 415/02

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control for the financial year 2022 – amending budget No 1

8

2022/C 415/03

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency for the financial year 2022 – amending budget No 1

13

2022/C 415/04

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority for the financial year 2022 – amending budget No 1

19

2022/C 415/05

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights for the financial year 2022 – amending budget No 2

25

2022/C 415/06

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Public Prosecutor's Office for the financial year 2022 – amending budget No 2

31

2022/C 415/07

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Public Prosecutor's Office for the financial year 2022 – amending budget No 3

36

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


Official Journal C 305/2007


| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| Official Journal of the European Union | | C 305 |
| European flag | | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 50 15 December 2007 |

---

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Notice No | Contents | page |
| | III   Preparatory Acts | |
| | COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS | |
| | 71st plenary session 10 and 11 October 2007 | |
| 2007/C 305/01 | [Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on ‘The energy package’](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/uriserv/OJ.C_.2007.305.01.0001.01.ENG.xhtml) | 1 |
| | | |
| 2007/C 305/02 | [Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on the | | | | --- | --- | | — | ‘Annual report of the six European TEN-T coordinators’ and | | — | ‘Trans-European Networks: Towards an Integrated Approach’ | | — | ‘Extension of the major trans-European transport axes’ |](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/uriserv/OJ.C_.2007.305.01.0006.01.ENG.xhtml) | 6 |
| | | |
| 2007/C 305/03 | [Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on ‘The future of European airports’](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/uriserv/OJ.C_.2007.305.01.0011.01.ENG.xhtml) | 11 |
| | | |
| 2007/C 305/04 | [Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on ‘Limiting Global Climate Change to 2 degrees Celsius’ and ‘The inclusion of aviation in the emission trading system’](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/uriserv/OJ.C_.2007.305.01.0015.01.ENG.xhtml) | 15 |
| | | |
| 2007/C 305/05 | [Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on ‘Local and regional Government in Ukraine and the development of cooperation between the EU and Ukraine’](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/uriserv/OJ.C_.2007.305.01.0020.01.ENG.xhtml) | 20 |
| | | |
| 2007/C 305/06 | [Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on ‘The European Research Area — New Perspectives’](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/uriserv/OJ.C_.2007.305.01.0025.01.ENG.xhtml) | 25 |
| | | |
| 2007/C 305/07 | [Outlook opinion of the Committee of the Regions on ‘Success factors for local and regional restructuring strategies’](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/uriserv/OJ.C_.2007.305.01.0030.01.ENG.xhtml) | 30 |
| | | |
| 2007/C 305/08 | [Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on ‘Better lawmaking 2005 and 2006’](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/uriserv/OJ.C_.2007.305.01.0038.01.ENG.xhtml) | 38 |
| | | |
| 2007/C 305/09 | [Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on ‘Applying the Global Approach to Migration to the European Union's Southern Maritime Borders and to the Eastern and South-Eastern Regions Neighbouring the European Union’](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/uriserv/OJ.C_.2007.305.01.0043.01.ENG.xhtml) | 43 |
| | | |
| 2007/C 305/10 | [Outlook opinion of the Committee of the Regions on ‘The situation of migrant women in the European Union’](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/uriserv/OJ.C_.2007.305.01.0048.01.ENG.xhtml) | 48 |
| | | |
| 2007/C 305/11 | [Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on ‘Equal opportunities and sport’](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/uriserv/OJ.C_.2007.305.01.0053.01.ENG.xhtml) | 53 |
| | | |

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| EN | |
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000797480
<NAME> SMITH BARNEY SECTOR SERIES
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER>003
   <NAME>SMITH BARNEY HEALTH SCIENCES FUND

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              8 Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   OCT-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                        OCT-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>               61,246,533
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>              71,543,348
<RECEIVABLES>                        1,221,712
<ASSETS-OTHER>                               0
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      72,765,060
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>               173,198
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                      0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                    0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                    173,198
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                              0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>            60,126,510
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                1,821,685
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                        0
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                    0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                (407,396)
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>              1,930,048
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                     0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>            10,296,815
<NET-ASSETS>                        71,945,977
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                      239,295
<INTEREST-INCOME>                       37,686
<OTHER-INCOME>                               0
<EXPENSES-NET>                         684,377
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>               (407,396)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>             1,930,048
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>           10,296,815
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>               11,819,467
<EQUALIZATION>                               0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                    0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                     0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                        0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>             70,184,936
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>        (10,058,426)
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                          0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>              71,945,977
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                      0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                    0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                      0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                   0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                  261,782
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                        821,086
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                17,801,431
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                    11.40
<PER-SHARE-NII>                          (0.09)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                   0.00
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                      0.00
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                 0.00
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                      0.00
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                      14.42
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                           2.25
[AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING]                       0
[AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE]                         0



</TABLE>
FILED

November 23, 1998

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate C ourt Clerk

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) Supreme Court

) No. 03-S01-9712-CR-00147

Appellee, )

)

v. ) KNOX COUNTY

)

CHRISTA GALE PIKE, ) 

) 

Appellant, )

)

ORDER ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

A petition for rehearing has been filed on behalf of appellant. After

consideration of the same, the Court is of the opinion that the petition should be

and the same is hereby denied at the cost of appellant.

PER CURIAM
SMITH BARNEY MONEY FUNDS, INC.
on behalf of
RETIREMENT PORTFOLIO
(the "Portfolio")

Supplement dated June 11, 1998
to
Prospectus dated April 30, 1998



	The Board of Directors approved a change in the dividend 
policy for the Retirement Portfolio, which will affect dividends 
declared during the remainder of 1998 without substantially 
affecting the actual yield earned by shareholders. 

The new policy is that the Portfolio will declare a dividend 
of substantially all of its net investment income on each day the 
NYSE is open for business, subject to such adjustments as may be 
approved by the Board.  The Board recently approved an adjustment 
whereby net investment income attributable to an expense 
reimbursement made to the Portfolio by the Portfolio's investment 
manager will be paid in proportionate amounts on each business day 
during the remainder of 1998 based upon the number of days 
remaining in the year.  This adjustment was made in order to avoid 
having the Portfolio's yield fluctuate disproportionately for a 
single day as a result of the Portfolio's receipt of the expense 
reimbursement.
Kenisha S. BOYD, Petitioner v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE

No. 19-6568

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
96-1149 Fuller v. Zavaras

Attachment not available electronically.
*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

-2-

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 12/19/96

TENTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

STEVEN M. TULLER, a/k/a STEVEN

MICHAEL TULLER,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

ARISTEDES W. ZAVARAS, DONICE NEAL,

GARY WATKINS, LORRAINE DIAZ,

EVELYN FISH, ROBERT D. MILLER, Dr.,

 Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-1149

(D.C. No. 94-N-1304)

(D. Colorado)

_____________________

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

_____________________

Before BRORBY, EBEL and HENRY, Circuit Judges.

_____________________

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore
1

 The district court's judgment was entered April 8, 1996; the Notice of

Appeal was filed April 12, 1996.

-3-

ordered submitted without oral argument.

Mr. Tuller is a state inmate and pro se litigant. The district court granted

an adverse summary judgment and allowed Mr. Tuller to appeal in forma

pauperis. We affirm the summary judgment granted by the district court.1

Mr. Tuller commenced this civil rights action against several prison

officials. Defendants moved for summary judgment with supporting evidentiary

materials. In a ten-page recommendation, the magistrate judge recommended the

motion be granted. The district court reviewed the recommendation de novo and

granted the motion. Attached hereto is a copy of the recommendation and the

order.

Mr. Tuller appeals the order of the trial court and asserts: (1) He is "locked

up in administrative segregation and has no ability to investigate the facts"; and

(2) the trial court did not give Mr. Tuller an opportunity "to submit his motion

and brief in opposition to defendants various motions for summary judgment."
-4-

The record on appeal does not support Mr. Tuller. In fact, it shows the

contrary.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED for substantially the

same reasons set forth in the magistrate judge's recommendations and the district

court's order.

Entered for the Court:

WADE BRORBY

United States Circuit Judge