alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Melvyn Perry SPROWSON, Jr., Petitioner, v. NEVADA.

No. 19-6100

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nevada denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1307 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1307

 To amend the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 to require the 
Bureau of Land Management to provide a claimant of a small miner waiver 
  from claim maintenance fees with a period of 60 days after written 
receipt of 1 or more defects is provided to the claimant by registered 
 mail to cure the 1 or more defects or pay the claim maintenance fee, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 20, 2013

 Mr. Young of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 to require the 
Bureau of Land Management to provide a claimant of a small miner waiver 
  from claim maintenance fees with a period of 60 days after written 
receipt of 1 or more defects is provided to the claimant by registered 
 mail to cure the 1 or more defects or pay the claim maintenance fee, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SMALL MINER WAIVERS TO CLAIM MAINTENANCE FEES.

    (a) In General.--Section 10101(d)(3) of the Omnibus Budget 
Reconciliation Act of 1993 (30 U.S.C. 28f(d)(3)) is amended by striking 
``for any reason, the claimant shall have a period of 60 days after 
receipt of written notification of the defect or defects by the Bureau 
of Land Management to:'' and inserting ``for any reason (including the 
failure to timely file a small miner's maintenance fee waiver 
application or an affidavit of annual labor associated with the 
application and required application fees), the claimant shall have a 
period of 60 days after receipt of written notification of the 1 or 
more defects provided by the Bureau of Land Management by registered 
mail to''.
    (b) Transition Rules.--The claimholder of claims numbered AA023149, 
AA023163, AA047913, AA047914, AA047915, AA047916, AA047917, AA047918, 
and AA047919 (as of December 29, 2004) shall be considered--
            (1) to have received a first half final certificate for 
        application AA072648 (associated with the claims) before 
        September 30, 1994; and
            (2) to qualify for relief under section 10101(d)(3) of the 
        Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (30 U.S.C. 28f(d)(3)) 
        and have the opportunity to cure under that section for any 
        prior period for which 1 or more defects existed or there was a 
        failure to pay claim maintenance fees.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

YVONNE STONE

, 1

Respondent Below, Appellant,

v.

CALVIN SMITH

,

Petitioner Below, Appellee. § § No. 198 , 202 2 § § Court Below

–

Family Court § of the State of Delaware § § File No. C N 19

- 013 1 1 § Petition No. 22

- 01774 § § §

Submitted: November 17

, 2023 Decided: January 12 , 202 4

Before VALIHURA

, TRAYNOR

, and LEGROW

, Justices.

ORDER

On May 25, 2023, the Court remanded this matter to the Family Court “for

the limited purpose of allowing the court to clarify what amount, if any, the

[appellant] is obligated to reimburse the [appellee] for the trial testimony of Dr.

Zingaro.” 2 On remand, the Family Court allowed the parties to supplement the

record and thereafter determined that the appellant is obligated to reimburse the

appellee for $375, or one

- half of Dr. Zingaro’s fee for testifying at trial, under the

Family Court’s January 6, 2020 order addressing the allocation of expenses between

the parties. The record supports the Fami ly Court’s decision.

1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d).

2 Stone v. Smith

, Del. Supr. No. 198, 2022, Traynor, J. (May 25, 2023) (ORDER)

.2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Family

Court be AFFIRMED

.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000906237
<NAME> SALOMON BROTHERS 2008

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                      510,937,786
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                     524,966,289
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,718,269
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                   6,855
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             532,691,413
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                   205,799,963
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                    7,079,498
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                        212,879,461
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                      0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                   323,567,874
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                       34,510,639
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                       34,510,639
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                    6,618,367
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                   (24,402,792)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                    14,028,503
<NET-ASSETS>                               319,811,952
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                                    0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                           17,760,222
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                               1,373,189
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                     16,387,033
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                   (7,861,543)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                   24,166,555
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                       32,692,045
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                   17,224,260
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                              0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                          0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                                  0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                      15,467,785
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                      7,455,594
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                 (16,541,249)
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                        1,185,447
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                              1,373,189
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                       314,601,327
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                             8.82
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                   0.47
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                           0.48
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                              0.50
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                         0.00
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                              0.00
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                               9.27
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                   0.86


</TABLE>
STATE v. Steven Daniel FISHER.

No. 356A03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 16, 2004.

Jonathan P. Babb, Special Deputy Attorney General, Thomas H. Lock, District Attorney, for State.

Stephen J. Batten, Williamston, Seth H. Jaffe, Raleigh, for ACLU-NC Legal Foundation, Inc.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th day of February 2004 by Defendant to Strike Portions of the State's New Brief:

> "Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 16th day of February 2004."
AVCO CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. Jill SIKKELEE, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of David Sikkelee, Deceased, et al.

No. 18-1140

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
** **

**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I,John J. McDonnell, Jr., certify that:

1.             Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TNS, Inc.;

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3              Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant andhave:

a.             Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

b.             Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c.             Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.             All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which arereasonable likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.             Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

DATE: May 10,2006
|  /s/ JOHN J. MCDONNELL, JR.      |   |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| John J.  McDonnell, Jr.          |   |   |
| Chairman and  Chief Executive Officer |   |   |

 

----
# Official Journal C 286A/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 286A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4923 November 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 286A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4923 November 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| 2006/C 286A/1 | NOTICE TO READERS | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

2006/C 286A/1

NOTICE TO READERS

1

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| 2006/C 286A/2 | Corrigendum to notices of open competitions EPSO/AD/53-62/06 to constitute a reserve of administrators (AD5) with Cypriot, Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Maltese, Polish, Slovene or Slovak citizenship in the fields of European public administration, Law, Economics and Microeconomics/Business administration (OJ C 172 A, 25.7.2006) | 3 |

Corrigenda

2006/C 286A/2

Corrigendum to notices of open competitions EPSO/AD/53-62/06 to constitute a reserve of administrators (AD5) with Cypriot, Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Maltese, Polish, Slovene or Slovak citizenship in the fields of European public administration, Law, Economics and Microeconomics/Business administration (OJ C 172 A, 25.7.2006)

3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Larry BENZON, Warden, Petitioner v. Troy Michael KELL.

No. 19-239

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
IN RE Garvester BRACKEN, Petitioner

No. 18-9107

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Independent Auditors' Consent




To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Smith Barney Investment Funds Inc:
We consent to the reference to our firm under the heading "Auditors"
in the Statement of Additional Information for the Smith Barney Small
Cap Growth Fund of Smith Barney Investment Funds Inc.

KPMG LLP
New York, New York
August 16, 2000



Independent Auditors' Consent




To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of the
Smith Barney Investment Funds Inc.
We consent to the incorporation by reference, in this Prospectus and
Statement of Additional Information, of our report dated February 11,
2000, on the statement of assets and liabilities for the Smith Barney
Government Securities Fund as of December 31, 1999, and the related
statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of
changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period
then ended and the financial highlights for each of the years in the
five-year period then ended. These financial statements and financial
highlights and our report thereon are included in the Annual Report of
the Fund as filed on Form N-30D.
We also consent to the references to our firm under the headings
"Financial Highlights" in the Prospectus and "Auditors" in the
Statement of Additional Information.



KPMG LLP
New York, New York
August 16, 2000

Page
James Michael PELUSO, Petitioner v. TEXAS.

No. 19-5827

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
# C_2017104EN.01004301.xml

| 3.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/43

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 February 2017 — SolarWorld v Commission

(Case T-783/14) (1)

1

((Dumping - Subsidies - Imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (cells) originating in or consigned from China - Approval of a downward adjustment of the minimum import price pursuant to an undertaking accepted in connection with anti-dumping and anti-subsidy proceedings - Union industry - Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009))

(2017/C 104/60)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: SolarWorld AG (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: L. Ruessmann, lawyer, and J. Beck, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the Commission’s decision, contained in a letter of 15 September 2014 addressed to the Chinese Chamber of Commerce for the Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products, bearing the reference TRADE/H4 (2014) 3328168, on the downward adjustment of the minimum import price for imports of photovoltaic modules and cells manufactured by Chinese exporting producers subject to a price undertaking with effect from 1 October 2014 for the last quarter of 2014.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders SolarWorld AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders SolarWorld AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 73, 2.3.2015.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1  Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
of Virgin Media Inc. and Virgin Media Investment Holdings Limited (the Registrants)
for the three months ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Neil Berkett, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Registrants, and Charles K. Gallagher, as Senior Vice
President - Finance of the Registrants, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrants.   /s/
  Neil BerkettName: Neil BerkettTitle:
  Chief Executive OfficerDate:
  August 7, 2008/s/
  Charles K. GallagherName: Charles K.GallagherTitle:
  Senior Vice President - FinanceDate:
  August 7, 2008  A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Registrants and will be retained by the Registrants and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrants for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Smith Barney Telecommunications Trust
on behalf of
Smith Barney Telecommunications Income Fund 
(the Fund)

Supplement Dated July 30, 1998
 to
 Prospectus Dated April 30, 1998 



Effective July 31, 1998, Smith Barney Strategy Advisers Inc., the Funds 
investment adviser, will assume all of the duties previously performed by The 
Boston Company Asset Management, Inc., the Funds sub-investment adviser.  
This change does not represent a change in investment objective, investment 
policies or investment strategies. 














FD 01528

U:legal\funds\sbtt\att\73198skr
Alvin Andrae DRUMMOND, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7006

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Jean BERNIER, aka Charles Watson, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6661.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Jan. 13, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Filed 2/26/13 In re Jack M. CA4/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

In re JACK M., a Person Coming Under 

the Juvenile Court Law.

SAN DIEGO COUNTY HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

SHERRI K., 

Defendant and Appellant.

 D063165

 (Super. Ct. No. NJ14677)

APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Michael 

Imhoff, Commissioner. Dismissed.

Sherri K. appeals orders entered at hearings held pursuant to Welfare and 

Institutions Code sections 300, subdivision (b), and 361, subdivision (c)(1). Citing In re 

Sade C. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 952, she asks this court to exercise its discretion to review the 

record for error.
2

In In re Sade C., the California Supreme Court held that review pursuant to People 

v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 is unavailable in "an indigent parent's appeal from a 

judgment or order, obtained by the state, adversely affecting [her] custody of a child or 

[her] status as the child's parent." (In re Sade C., supra, 13 Cal.4th at p. 959.) We 

therefore deny Sherri's requests to review the record for error and to address her Anders

issue. (Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738.)

Sherri's counsel requests leave for her client to file a supplemental brief in propria 

persona. ( In re Phoenix H. (2009) 47 Cal.4th 835.) Counsel also asks this court to order 

her to brief any arguable issue. (Penson v. Ohio (1988) 488 U.S. 75, 88.) The requests 

are denied.

DISPOSITION

The appeal is dismissed.

MCCONNELL, P. J.

WE CONCUR:

O'ROURKE, J.

AARON, J.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1402 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the authorization of appropriations for the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to pay a monthly assistance allowance to disabled veterans training or competing for the 

Paralympic Team and the authorization of appropriations for the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide assistance to United States 

Paralympics, Inc. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 25, 2013 

Mr. COFFMAN (for himself and Mr. TAKANO) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the authorization of appropriations for the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to pay a monthly assistance allowance to disabled 

veterans training or competing for the Paralympic Team 

and the authorization of appropriations for the Secretary 

of Veterans Affairs to provide assistance to United 

States Paralympics, Inc. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1402 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Paralympic 

3 Act of 2013’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIA5 TIONS FOR PAYMENT OF A MONTHLY ASSIST6 ANCE ALLOWANCE TO DISABLED VETERANS 

7 TRAINING OR COMPETING FOR THE 

8 PARALYMPIC TEAM. 

9 Section 322(d)(4) of title 38, United States Code, is 

10 amended by striking ‘‘2013’’ and inserting ‘‘2018’’. 

11 SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIA12 TIONS FOR ASSISTANCE TO UNITED STATES 

13 PARALYMPICS, INC. 

14 Section 521A of such title is amended— 

15 (1) in subsection (g), by striking ‘‘2013’’ and 

16 inserting ‘‘2018’’; and 

17 (2) in subsection (l), by striking ‘‘2013’’ and in18 serting ‘‘2018’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS