alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1095 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to direct the Assistant Secretary 

of Homeland Security (Transportation Security Administration) to transfer unclaimed money recovered at airport security checkpoints to nonprofit organizations that provide places of rest and recuperation at airports for members of the Armed Forces and their families, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 12, 2013 

Mr. MILLER of Florida (for himself and Mr. ROGERS of Alabama) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to direct the Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation Security Administration) to transfer unclaimed money recovered at airport security checkpoints to nonprofit organizations that provide places of rest and recuperation 

at airports for members of the Armed Forces and their 

families, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1095 IH

1 SECTION 1. DISPOSITION OF UNCLAIMED MONEY RECOV2 ERED AT AIRPORT SECURITY CHECKPOINTS. 

3 (a) DISPOSITION OF UNCLAIMED MONEY.—Section 

4 44945 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by 

5 striking ‘‘shall be retained by the Transportation Security 

6 Administration’’ and all that follows before the period at 

7 the end and inserting ‘‘shall be annually transferred, with8 out further appropriation, by the Assistant Secretary to 

9 nonprofit organizations that operate airport centers in 

10 multiple locations throughout the United States to provide 

11 a place of rest and recuperation for members of the Armed 

12 Forces and their families’’. 

13 (b) ANNUAL REPORT.—Section 515(b) of the De14 partment of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2005 

15 (Public Law 108–334; 118 Stat. 1318; 49 U.S.C. 44945 

16 note) is amended— 

17 (1) by striking ‘‘the Committee on Transpor18 tation and Infrastructure of the House of Represent19 atives’’ and inserting ‘‘the Committee on Homeland 

20 Security of the House of Representatives’’; and 

21 (2) by striking ‘‘and specifically how the un22 claimed money is being used to provide civil aviation 

23 security’’ and inserting ‘‘and the amount of un24 claimed money transferred to nonprofit organizaVerDate Mar 14 2013 18:16 Mar 15, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1095.IH H1095

srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1095 IH

1 tions under section 44945 of title 49, United States 

2 Code, and the dates of such transfers’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
UNITED STATES CODE)
  (1)
    
    the 10-Q Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and(2)
    
    the information contained in the 10-Q
Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
 Date: November 14, 2008
    /s/ Carl KukkonenCarl KukkonenChief Executive OfficerDate: November 14, 2008
    /s/ Stephen J. MuziStephen J. MuziChief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Telewest Global, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in this
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 11, 2004

/s/ Barry R. Elson
------------------------------
Barry R. Elson
Acting Chief Executive Officer
STATE of North Carolina v. Jeffrey BOWES.

No. 394A03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2004.

Jeffrey R. Edwards, Assistant Attorney General, Clark Everett, District Attorney, for State.

Leslie S. Robinson, Keith A. Williams, Greenville, for Bowes.

Prior report: 159 N.CApp. 18, 583 S.E.2d 294.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by the Attorney General on the 30th day of July 2003 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2004."

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Attorney General in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

> "Retained by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2004."

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by the Attorney General on the 30th day of July 2003 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2004."

Accordingly, only those issues which are the basis of the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals and the issues raised in the Notice of Appeal based upon a Constitutional Question shall be presented to this Court in briefs. The Plaintiffs new brief so limited in scope shall be filed with this Court not more that 30 days from the date of certification of this order.

Justices MARTIN and WAINWRIGHT recused.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 VIASPACE INC.
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of VIASPACE Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: November 10, 2006
    /s/ STEPHEN J. MUZIStephen J. MuziChief Financial Officer 35
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 21, 2009 

p1214 

Order 

 

December 21, 2009 

139576 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139576 

 COA: 282172 

Berrien CC: 1987-001308-FH 

ANTHONY LEE VANDURMEN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 14, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
Smith Barney Investment Trust:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements 
of Smith Barney Investment Trust (the "Funds") consisting of 
Smith Barney Intermediate New York Municipals Fund, Smith Barney 
Intermediate Maturity California Municipals Fund, Smith Barney 
Large Capitalization Growth Fund, Smith Barney S&P 500 Index 
Fund, and Smith Barney Mid Cap Blend Fund for the year ended 
November 30, 1998, we considered its internal control, including 
control activities for safeguarding securities, in order to 
determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing 
our opinion on the financial statements and to comply with the 
requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on the 
internal control.

The management of the Funds is responsible for establishing and 
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility, 
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the 
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally, 
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's 
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes 
that are fairly presented in conformity with generally accepted 
accounting principles. Those controls include the safeguarding of 
assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition. 

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, error or 
fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any 
evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to 
the risk that it may become inadequate because of changes in 
conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation 
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily 
disclose all matters in internal control that might be material 
weaknesses under standards established by the American Institute 
of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness is a 
condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the 
internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low 
level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in 
amounts that would be material in relation to the financial 
statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a 
timely period by employees in the normal course of performing 
their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters involving 
internal control and its operation, including controls for 
safeguarding securities that we consider to be material 
weaknesses as defined above. 

This report is intended solely for the information and use of 
management, the Board of Trustees of the Funds, and the 
Securities and Exchange Commission.



January 15, 1999
Ayanna ANGLE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9423

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 07, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with this  Quarterly  Report of Modena 1 Inc. (the  "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I John Fitzpatrick,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to
the best of his knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ John Fitzpatrick
--------------------------
John Fitzpatrick
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer

March 15, 2004
TKC AEROSPACE INC., Petitioner v. Charles Taylor MUHS

No. 19-293

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
STATE of North Carolina v. Kenneth Delano BOBBITT.

No. 667P03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 4, 2004.

Kenneth Delano Bobbitt, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Tom Horner, District Attorney, for State.

***784*****ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by-Defendant on the 22nd day of December 2003 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of March 2004."
Terrance PROCTOR, Petitioner, v. Wendy KELLEY, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction.

No. 18-8951

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas denied.
STATE v. Michael Eugene REED, II.

No. 232P01-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 3, 2004.

Mark L. Killian, Newton, for Reed.

James C. Gaither, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd day of March 2004 by Attorney General to Extend Time to Respond to Petition for Writ of Certiorari:

> "Motion Allowed. Attorney General shall have up to and including the 12th day of March 2004 to file his/her response with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of March 2004."
In the MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF Bruce B. MCLEOD, III.

No. D-3045

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Disbarment order entered.
----

            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE         

No 23/2005

of 8 February 2005         

amending Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement, on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Articles 86 and 98 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following shall be inserted after paragraph 3 of Article 16 of Protocol 31 to the Agreement:

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following the last notification to the EEA Joint Committee under Article 103(1) of the Agreement (*1).

It shall apply from 1 January 2005.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 February 2005.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Richard WRIGHT            

----

(1)OJ L 349, 25.11.2004, p. 52.

(2)OJ L 142, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

(*1)  Constitutional requirements indicated.

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 Exhibit 32 DIVERSIFIED OPPORTUNITIES, INC. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Diversified Opportunities, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin Russeth, Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: February 12, 2009/s/ Kevin RussethKevin RussethChief Executive Officer and principal financial officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 01/07/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      359,668
COMMITMENTS
 116,494  163,966   78,223  145,658   94,210  340,375  336,399   19,293   23,269

CHANGES FROM 12/31/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      9,972)
   3,212   10,692      254    6,477   -1,332    9,943    9,614       29      358

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    32.4     45.6     21.7     40.5     26.2     94.6     93.5      5.4      6.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      167)
      52       61       61       35       36      121      135
```

----

Updated January 10, 2014
ACCEPTED 03-15-00237-CR 12896951 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/26/2016 12:06:12 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK
# C_2022037EN.01005601.xml

| 24.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/56

---

Action brought on 6 December 2021 — Société des produits Nestlé v EUIPO — The a2 Milk Company (A2)

(Case T-759/21)

(2022/C 37/73)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Société des produits Nestlé SA (Vevey, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Jaeger-Lenz and J. Thomsen, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: The a2 Milk Company Ltd (Auckland, New Zealand)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark A2 — International registration designating the European Union No 1 438 650

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 October 2021 in Case R 2447/2020-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | annul the decision of the Opposition Division of the EUIPO of 17 November 2020, and reject opposition no. B 3080425 in its entirety and allow international registration no. WO 1438650 to proceed for designation in the European Union and; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Opposition Division of the EUIPO of 17 November 2020, and reject opposition no. B 3080425 in its entirety and allow international registration no. WO 1438650 to proceed for designation in the European Union and;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings before the General Court and order the potential intervener to pay the costs before the EUIPO in the opposition and appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings before the General Court and order the potential intervener to pay the costs before the EUIPO in the opposition and appeal proceedings.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
Abisai RAMIREZ-ANGUIANO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5929

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
CLEARSTREAM BANKING S.A., Petitioner, v. Deborah D. PETERSON, et al.

No. 17-1529

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020, Pub. L. No. 116- ---- (S. 1790).
SCHEDULE 1

				  	10f-3 REPORT

				 SMITH BARNEY MUNI FUNDS
   			           NATIONAL PORTFOLIO

			   May 1, 2002 through July 31, 2002

			  Trade						% of
Issuer			   Date	    Selling Dealer  Amount  Price     Issue (1)
Memphis-Shelby, TN Sports 5/17/2002 Goldman Sachs  $3,000,000 $96.832 14.41%A
   Authority Arena PJ A
   5.125% due 11/1/2028

Metropolitan Pier & Expo 6/14/2002  Loop Securities 250,000    95.482	1.87B
   Authority, IL
   5.000% due 12/15/2028

Metropolitan Pier & Expo 6/14/2002  ABN AMRO Bank  3,000,000	58.274	0.28
   STP 5.50 2012
   0.000% due 6/15/2020

Metropolitan Pier & Expo 6/14/2002  Morgan Stanley 3,000,000	57.992	.028
   STP 5.55 2012		    Dean Witter
   0.000% due 6/15/2020

Tobacco Settlement Corp. 6/24/2002  PaineWebberInc. 5,000,000	98.821	1.54
   R.I. AL 7.55
   6.000% due 6/1/2023

(1) Represents purchases by all affiliated funds; may not exceed
        25% of the principalamount of the offering.



A - Includes purchases of $13,335,000 by other Smith Barney Mutual Funds.
B - Includes purchases of $20,000,000 by other Smith Barney Mutual Funds.