alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Wireless
Holdings, Inc., for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2004, I, Joseph Hess, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Wireless Holdings, Inc. hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September
          30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the period ended September 30, 2004, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
          Wireless Holdings, Inc.

Dated:  November 10, 2004

WIRELESS HOLDINGS, INC.


By: /s/ Joseph Hess
-------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
FILED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DEC 1 2 2023

SHERMAN DIVISION

Clerk, U.S. District Court

Eastern District of Texas

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

ROBBERTA MARIE KHAN (4)

§

§

§

§ CASE NUMBER 4:23-CR-00268

§

§

§

§

ORDER

Because the above-named defendant has testified under oath or has otherwise satisfied this

court that he/she (1) is financially unable to employ counsel, and (2) does not wish to waive

counsel, and because the interests of justice so require, the Federal Public Defender is appointed

to represent this person in the above-designated case.

The appointment shall remain in effect until terminated or a substitute attorney is

appointed.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this December 12, 2023 

Case 4:23-cr-00268-SDJ-KPJ Document 12 Filed 12/12/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 27
Arthur J. LOMAX, Petitioner v. Christina ORTIZ-MARQUEZ, et al.

No. 18-8369

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 14, 2020

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cohen & Company Inc. (the Company) for the three months ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel G. Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



Signed:

/s/ Daniel G. CohenName:

Daniel G. CohenTitle:    Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer


Date: November 9, 2010
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q REPORT  OF  REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC.  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  (CHAPTER 63, TITLE 18 U.S.C.
SS.SS. 1350(a) AND (b))

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350(a) and (b)), the
undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: October 22, 2009/s/ GILBERT M. CASSAGNE Gilbert M. Cassagne,
Chief Executive Officer


The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350(a) and (b)), is not
a part of the Form 10-Q to which it refers and is, to the extent permitted by law, provided by the above signatory to the extent of his knowledge.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 4.11

FOURTH
AMENDMENT TO THE

FIRSTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

1993 STOCK OPTION PLAN

               This
Fourth Amendment to the Firstwave Technologies, Inc. 1993 Stock Option Plan
(the “Amendment”) is made as of the 1st day of May 2003, by Firstwave
Technologies, Inc., a Georgia corporation (the “Company”).


WITNESSETH:

               WHEREAS,
the Company established the Firstwave Technologies, Inc. 1993
Stock Option Plan and amended such plan May 12, 1998 and May 14, 2001 and May
2, 2002(the “Plan”);

               WHEREAS,
Section 15 of the Plan permits the Board of Directors of the
Company to amend the Plan at any time without shareholder approval; provided,
however, that the Board of Directors may condition any amendment on the
approval of the shareholders of the Company if such approval is necessary or
advisable with respect to tax, securities or other applicable laws to which the
Company, the Plan, optionees or eligible employees are subject: and

               WHEREAS,
the Board of Directors has authorized and directed, subject to
such shareholder approval, the increase by 300,000 the total number of Shares
which may be granted or awarded under the Plan.

               NOW,
THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the foregoing
premises, and other good and valuable consideration, the Plan is amended as
follows:

	
   
  	
  5.
  	
  By deleting the first sentence of Section 4 and
  substituting the following:
  
	
   
  	
   
  	
   
  
	
   
  	
   
  	
  “The Company has authorized and reserved for
  issuance upon the exercise of Options and Formula Options pursuant to the
  Plan an aggregate of 816,667 shares of no par value common stock of the
  Company (the “Shares”).
  
	
   
  	
   
  	
   
  
	
   
  	
  6.
  	
  This Amendment shall be effective as of the date set
  forth above.  Except as hereby
  amended, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
  



               IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned does hereby execute this

Amendment as of the date set forth above.

	
   
  	
   
  	
  FIRSTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
  
	
   
  	
   
  	
   
  
	
   
  	
   
  	
  By:
  	
   
  	
  /s/ Richard T. Brock
  	
   
  
	
   
  	
   
  	
   
  	
  



  	
  



  	
   
  
	
   
  	
   
  	
   
  	
  Richard T. Brock, President and

  Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,

AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.



In connection with the quarterly report of Money4Gold Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Douglas Feirstein, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and



2.

The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: May 20, 2009





|                              | 
|----------------------------- | 
|/s/ DOUGLAS FEIRSTEIN         | 
|Douglas Feirstein             | 
|Chief Executive Officer       | 
|(Principal Executive Officer) |
### JUDGMENT 

## Court of Appeals First District of Texas

NO. 01

- 1 4

- 0 0 7 13

- CV
MOHAMED FARRAG , Appellant

V.
DANIELLE BRYAN , Appellee Appeal from the 280 th District Court of Harris County (Tr. Ct. No. 20 14

- 38348 )

Th is is an appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on July 29, 201 4

. Appellant, Mohamed Farrag , did not timely file a brief. After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. It is therefore CONSIDERED , ADJUDGED , and ORDERED that the appeal be dismissed for want of prosecution

. It is further ORDERED that appellant pay all costs incurred by reason of this appeal.
It is further ORDERED that this decision be certified below for observance. Judgment rendered January 22, 201 5

. Judgment rendered by pan el consisting of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle

.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 5261-023]

                    On June 6, 2022, Green Mountain Power Corporation submitted to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) a copy of its application for a Clean Water Act section 401(a)(1) water quality certification filed with Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation (Vermont DEC), in conjunction with the above captioned project. Pursuant to 40 CFR 121.6 and section [4.34(b)(5), 5.23(b), 153.4, or 157.22] of the Commission's regulations,[1]                                          we hereby notify the Vermont DEC of the following:                

*Date of Receipt of the Certification Request:*                     June 3, 2022.                

*Reasonable Period of Time To Act on the Certification Request:*                     June 3, 2023.                

If Vermont DEC fails or refuses to act on the water quality certification request on or before the above date, then the agency certifying authority is deemed waived pursuant to section 401(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1).

Dated: June 14, 2022.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             18 CFR [4.34(b)(5)/5.23(b)/153.4/157.22].                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2022-13283 Filed 6-21-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
# C_2018007EN.01001202.xml

| 10.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/12

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2018/C 7/11)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 6.11.2017 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 6.11.2017-31.12.2017 |
| Member State | France |
| Stock or Group of stocks | PLE/7HJK. |
| Species | Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) |
| Zone | VIIh, VIIj and VIIk |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 42/TQ127 |

Date and time of closure

6.11.2017

Duration

6.11.2017-31.12.2017

Member State

France

Stock or Group of stocks

PLE/7HJK.

Species

Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa)

Pleuronectes platessa

Zone

VIIh, VIIj and VIIk

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

42/TQ127

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
Solomon MCLEMORE, Petitioner v. CITY OF SHORELINE, WASHINGTON

No. 19-202

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 16, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Washington denied.
----

Action brought on 26 March 2005 by the Kingdom of Belgium against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-134/05)

(2005/C 132/59)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 26 March 2005 by the Kingdom of Belgium, represented by Jean-Pierre Buyle and Christophe Steyaert, lawyers.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

From 1987 to 1992 the Commission asked the applicant to repay certain sums paid out of the European Social Fund (ESF) and transferred by the Commission directly to various Belgian bodies acting as promoters but not used by them in accordance with the rules relating to the ESF.

In 2004 the Commission set off certain sums payable by the applicant by virtue of its former claims against claims the applicant had against the Commission. Following that setting off, the applicant sent several letters to the Commission to which the Commission replied by the contested decision, stating that the former claims were not time-barred, contrary to the contention of the applicant.

In support of its application the applicant submits that the claims at issue are time-barred pursuant to Article 3.1 of Regulation No 2988/95/EC or, in the alternative, pursuant to the provisions of Belgian law, applicable here pursuant to Article 2.4 of Regulation No 2988/95/EC.

The applicant also disputes the charging by the Commission of default interest. According to the applicant there are specific rules on the subject, namely in Regulation No 1865/90/EEC and Regulation No 448/2001/EC, derogating from Article 86 of 2342/2002/EC which is relied on by the Commission to justify the imposition of default interest. The applicant submits that those specific rules do not provide for the imposition of default interest in respect of ESF action decided on before 6 July 1990 and, therefore, the Commission cannot claim default interest on the claims in question.

----
APACHE CORPORATION, Petitioner v. Bigie Lee RHEA

No. 19-503

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
# Official Journal C 422A/17 N

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 422A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5917 November 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 422A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5917 November 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2016/C 422 A/01 | Vacancy notice ECA/2016/20 — Two director posts — Audit (AD function group, grade 14) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Court of Auditors

2016/C 422 A/01

Vacancy notice ECA/2016/20 — Two director posts — Audit (AD function group, grade 14)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1254 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1254

  To repeal a requirement that new employees of certain employers be 
     automatically enrolled in the employer's health benefits plan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 19, 2013

  Mr. Hudson (for himself and Mr. Pittenger) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 
                               Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To repeal a requirement that new employees of certain employers be 
     automatically enrolled in the employer's health benefits plan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Auto Enroll Repeal Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL.

    Section 18A of the Fair Labor Standards Act (29 U.S.C. 218a), as 
added by section 1511 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care 
Act, is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
# Official Journal C 267/14 A

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 267 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5814 August 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 267

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5814 August 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 267/01 | Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of the Directive 2000/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to cableway installations designed to carry persons (Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under Union harmonisation legislation)
   (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 267/01

Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of the Directive 2000/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to cableway installations designed to carry persons (Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under Union harmonisation legislation)
   (
  1
  )

(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under Union harmonisation legislation)

1

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
May 9, 1997
Smith Barney New Jersey Municipals Fund Inc.
388 Greenwich Street
New York, New York 10013

                   Re:  Rule 24f-2 Notice
                              
Gentlemen:

    In connection with the filing by Smith Barney New Jersey
Municipals Fund Inc., a Maryland corporation (the "Fund"),
of a Notice (the "Notice"), pursuant to Rule 24f-2 (the
"Rule")under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended
(the "Act"), for the Fund's fiscal year ended March 31 1997,
the undersigned hereby provides the legal opinion required
by that Rule.

     In accordance with the Rule, the Fund has registered an
indefinite number of shares of common stock, $0.001 par
value, under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"1933 Act"). The purpose of the Notice is to make definite
the registration of 1,970,815 shares of the Fund (the
"Shares") sold in reliance upon the Rule during the fiscal
year ended March 31, 1997.

     The undersigned is Associate General Counsel of Smith
Barney Mutual Funds Management Inc., the Fund's Investment
Adviser and Administrator, and in such capacity, from time
to time and for certain purposes, acts as counsel to the
Fund. He has examined copies of the Fund's Articles of
Incorporation, its By-Laws, resolutions adopted by its Board
of Directors, and such other records and documents as have
been deemed necessary for purposes of this opinion.
Furthermore, he has examined a Certificate of the Controller
of the Fund to the effect that the Fund received the cash
consideration for each of the Shares in accordance with the
aforementioned organizational documents and resolutions.

     On the basis of the foregoing, and assuming all of the
Shares were sold in accordance with the terms of the Fund's
Prospectus in effect at the time of sale, he is of the
opinion that the Shares have been duly authorized and
validly issued and are fully paid and non-assessable.  This
opinion is for the limited purposes expressed above and
should not be deemed to be an expression of opinion as to
compliance with the 1933 Act, the 1940 Act or applicable
State "blue sky" laws in connection with the sales of the
Shares.


                                        Very truly yours,


                                        David Barnett
                                        Associate General
                                        Counsel
                                        Smith Barney Mutual
Funds
Management Inc.
Donald G. FLINT, Petitioner v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

No. 18-9147

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 16, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
CONCERT INVESTMENT SERIES
on behalf of
Growth and Income Fund (the "Fund")

Supplement dated August 14, 2000 to
Prospectus dated February 28, 2000



The following information revises and supersedes, as applicable, the
information set forth in the Prospectus of the Fund under "Management-
Growth and Income".

Commencing August 14, 2000, Michael Kagan assumed responsibility
as portfolio manager of the Fund.  Mr. Kagan is currently an Investment
Officer of the manager and a Director of Salomon Smith Barney Inc.
Keino S. CHRICHLOW, Petitioner v. Dana METZGER, Warden, et al.

No. 19-6259

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 16, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Lilron Ravon JONES, Petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 18-9664

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District denied.