alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CONSULTING GROUP CAPITAL MARKETS FUNDS (the "Trust")
Supplement dated August 3, 1998 to the Prospectus dated July 1, 1998

On June 18, 1998 the Trust's Board of Trustees approved the 
following:

The hiring of State Street Global Advisors ("State Street") and 
Baring Asset Management, Inc. ("Baring") as additional investment 
advisers to Emerging Markets Equity Investments ("Emerging Markets 
Portfolio").  The Consulting Group, a division of Mutual Management 
Corp. ("MMC"), the Trust's investment manager, recommended the addition 
of State Street and Baring because it was determined that their 
investment styles would complement the fundamental investment style of 
AIB Govett Asset Management Limited ("Govett"), the Emerging Markets 
Portfolio's current investment adviser.

State Street seeks to identify markets and securities that are 
misvalued relative to their growth potential by identifying 
inefficiencies in the emerging markets.  State Street employs an 
investment process that is primarily quantitatively driven that combines 
top-down country selection with bottom-up stock selection to determine 
an optimal country and security mix. 

Baring seeks to identify unrecognized growth investment 
opportunities through a comprehensive investment framework in the 
emerging markets.  Baring also  employs an investment process that 
combines top-down country allocation with bottom-up stock selection to 
determine an optimal country and security mix. Baring's process is 
driven by structured fundamental research at both the country and stock 
level.

MMC entered into investment advisory agreements with State Street 
and Baring on July 15, 1998 and August 3, 1998, respectively.  Under the 
terms of the agreement, both State Street and Baring will be receiving 
0.60% for their services, a fee that is computed daily and paid monthly 
based on the value of the average net assets of the Emerging Markets 
Portfolio allocated to each adviser.  By the end of the year, the assets 
of the Emerging Markets Portfolio will be allocated approximately as 
follows:   Govett  40%, State Street 30% and Baring 30%.  

State Street, located in Boston, Massachusetts, is a division of 
State Street Bank and Trust Company.  State Street provides investment 
advisory services to a wide variety of clients world-wide and, as of 
March 31, 1998, had assets under management of approximately $470 
billion. 

Baring, located in Boston, Massachusetts, is a member of ING 
Group.  Baring provides investment advisory services to a wide variety 
of clients world-wide and, as of March 31, 1998, had assets under 
management of approximately $42 billion.  




FD  01532
Kenneth BLACKWELL, Petitioner, v. GEORGIA

No. 19-5079

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

WONDERSHARE TECHNOLOGY GROUP

CO LTD.,

Defendants.

 CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-cv-00046

 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF

TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 

Plaintiff Display Technologies, LLC (“Plaintiff”) respectfully submits this Motion for a 14-day 

Extension of Time to Respond to Wondershare Technology Group Co Ltd.’s (“Defendant” or 

“Wondershare”) Motion to Dismiss, filed at Docket 7.

Plaintiff’s Response is currently due April 4, 2024.

Counsel for Plaintiff has conferred with counsel for Defendant, and both have agreed to extend 

the deadline for Plaintiff to respond to the Motion to April 18, 2024. The present request is not offered 

for the purpose of delay or advantage.

Case 2:24-cv-00046-JRG-RSP Document 10 Filed 04/04/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 106
Dated: April 4, 2024 Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Randall Garteiser

Randall Garteiser

 Texas Bar No. 24038912

 rgarteiser@ghiplaw.com

GARTEISER HONEA, PLLC

119 W. Ferguson Street

Tyler, Texas 75702

Telephone: (903) 705-7420

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

The undersigned attorney represents and confirms that a conference was conducted with 

opposing counsel prior to filing this Motion, and counsel indicated its agreement with the relief 

requested herein.

/s/ Randall Garteiser

Randall Garteiser

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above document has been 

served to all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service via the Court’s 

CM/ECF system on.

/s/ Randall Garteiser

Randall Garteiser

Case 2:24-cv-00046-JRG-RSP Document 10 Filed 04/04/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 107
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACTRULES**

 

I, William P. Brick, certify that:

 

1.                     Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc.;

 

2.                     Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                     Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.                     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)  Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)  Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)  Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.                     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a)  Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

b)  Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.

 
| Date: May 11,  2004 |                                       |
|---------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                |                                       |
|                | /s/ William P.  Brick                      |   |
|                | William P.  Brick, Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018308EN.01000601.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 31.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 308/6 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9024 — Abry Partners/Link)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 308/06)

1.

On 24 August 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 and following a referral pursuant to Article 4(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018308EN.01000601-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Abry Partners II LLC (‘Abry Partners’, United States), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Link Mobility Group ASA (‘Link’, Norway). |

Abry Partners acquires, within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation, indirect sole control of Link, by way of a public bid.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Abry Partners: manages private equity funds. The funds managed by Abry hold interests in a broad range of businesses focusing on media, communications, business and information services;

—   for Link: is active in the a mobile communication sector, specialising in mobile messaging services, mobile solutions and mobile intelligence, across different industries and sectors.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018308EN.01000601-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9024 — Abry Partners/Link

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| E-mail: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018308EN.01000601-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018308EN.01000601-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/11/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       63,306
COMMITMENTS
  18,867    4,933    3,003   26,331   42,242   48,201   50,178   15,105   13,128

CHANGES FROM 03/04/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,711)
   1,594     -569      856      784    2,316    3,234    2,603     -523      108

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    29.8      7.8      4.7     41.6     66.7     76.1     79.3     23.9     20.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       81)
      30       11       11       29       29       63       48
```

----

Updated March 18, 2014
Exhibit 31.1

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Clive Barwin, certify that:
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Melt Inc.; |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------|

2.            Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.            Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.             I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and I have:

a)             designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)            evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c)             disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

5.             I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)             all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)            any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: November 10, 2005

 

*/s/ Clive Barwin*

Clive Barwin, President, CEO and Secretary 

(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
Report of Independent Accountants

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
The Emerging Markets Floating Rate Fund Inc.


In planning and performing our audit of the financial
 statements of The Emerging Markets Floating Rate
Fund Inc. (hereafter referred to as the "Fund") for the
 year ended February 28, 2002, we considered its internal
 control, including control activities for safeguarding securities,
 in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of
expressing our opinion on the financial statements and to comply
with the requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance
on internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates
and judgments by management are required to assess the expected
benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally, controls that are
relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's objective of preparing
financial statements for external purposes that are fairly presented in
 conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.  Those
controls include the safeguarding of assets against unauthorized
acquisition, use or disposition.
Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or fraud
may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any evaluation
of internal control to future periods is subject to the risk that controls
may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the
effectiveness of the design and operation may deteriorate.
Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily disclose all
matters in internal control that might be material weaknesses under
standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants.  A material weakness is a condition in which the
design or operation of one or more of the internal control components
does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that misstatements
caused by error or fraud in amounts that would be material in relation
to the financial statements being audited may occur and not be
detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course
of performing their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters
involving internal control and its operation, including controls for
safeguarding securities, that we consider to be material weaknesses
as defined above as of February 28, 2002.
This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management and the Board of Directors of the Fund and the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not intended to be and
should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

April 18, 2002

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
The Emerging Markets Floating Rate Fund Inc.


	(2)
----

(2004/C 78 E/0305)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-3618/03

by Stavros Xarchakos (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(1 December 2003)

Subject:   Building cooperatives in Greece

Commissioner Byrne gave me a polite reply to my question No E-2850/03 (1), indicating that the issue it touched on was a ‘private matter’, and at the same time providing a brief analysis of timeshare leases which, however, have no connection with the issue which I raised in my question.

I would like to return to the subject I initially raised, which affects at least 500 000 Greek citizens (as many leading Greek newspapers have been pointing out) and which consists of the following totally unacceptable situation: there are building cooperatives in Greece which were founded up to 38 years ago (such as the Medical Staff Summer Property Cooperative situated in Athens which owns land in Saronida, Attica, and many other plots), whose members have been paying their annual and additional contributions for decades, but nobody is giving them any information on when they will receive the plots to which they are entitled.

The Greek press has reported that associations of cooperative members are already making moves in the direction of an appeal to the Court of Justice of the European Communities. Is it consistent with EU legislation that thousands of Greek nationals (EU citizens) have been paying subscriptions — for decades! — without so far receiving any assets? Which provision in EU legislation might they invoke in support of their claims?

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(15 January 2004)

On the basis of the information provided by the Honourable Member, it does not appear that the situation described is covered by a specific consumer protection Community legislation.

For the rest, and although it sympathises with the predicaments of the people affected by such a difficult situation, the Commission is not empowered to take action in the case of private disputes between companies/professionals and consumers.

This matter, being an internal issue and taking into account the principle of subsidiarity, appears to be solely for the national authorities concerned and in particular the national jurisdictions. If, at a later stage, a national jurisdiction considers that the case raises a question of Community law and encounters problems of interpretation, it can make use of the preliminary ruling procedure and bring its questions before the Court of justice.

----

(1)  See page 179.

----
Stevrick Tavah JACKSON, Petitioner v. FLORIDA.

No. 19-5762

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District denied.
Kealii MAKEKAU, et al., Petitioners, v. HAWAII, et al.

No. 19-1064.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 4, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 35.1

AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE 

SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT AND

ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

I, Paul C. Honda, do hereby certify that I am the Vice President and Assistant Secretary of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation (the “Company”), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer” and “Sponsor”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of February 28, 2018 among the Servicer and Sponsor, American Honda Receivables LLC, as Seller, and Honda Auto Receivables 2018-1 Owner Trust, as follows:

|   | (i) | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period ended March 31, 2020, and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period in all material respects. |
|--------|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 29th day of May, 2020.

 

|   | /s/ Paul C. Honda                                    |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Paul C. Honda                                        |  |
|   | Vice President and Assistant Secretary               |  |
|   | (senior officer in charge of the servicing function) |  |
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET-WTI - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                      Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/29/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      490,037
COMMITMENTS
 102,054   30,836  119,674  250,618  328,077  472,346  478,587   17,691   11,450

CHANGES FROM 07/22/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,623)
  -8,896    4,856    3,428    8,548   -2,575    3,080    5,709     -457   -3,086

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    20.8      6.3     24.4     51.1     66.9     96.4     97.7      3.6      2.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      145)
      43       27       61       65       65      136      130
```

----

Updated August 1, 2014