alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Comfort Delando ROBERTS, Applicant, v. TEXAS.

No. 19A729 (19-6971)

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Application to recall and stay mandate addressed to Justice Sotomayor and referred to the Court denied.
Floyd M. CHODOSH, et al., Petitioners, v. PALM BEACH PARK ASSOCIATION.

No. 18-9669

Supreme Court of the United States.

Nov. 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three denied.
# Official Journal L 127/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 127 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4915 May 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 127

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4915 May 2006

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Council Regulation (EC) No 728/2006 of 15 May 2006 suspending and conditionally repealing Regulation (EC) No 2193/2003 establishing additional customs duties on imports of certain products originating in the United States of America | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

*

Council Regulation (EC) No 728/2006 of 15 May 2006 suspending and conditionally repealing Regulation (EC) No 2193/2003 establishing additional customs duties on imports of certain products originating in the United States of America

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Independent Auditors' Report



The Board of Directors of
Smith Barney Allocation Series Inc.:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements of the
Global, High Growth, Growth, Balanced, Conservative, and Income Portfolios of
Smith Barney Allocation Series Inc. (the "Funds") for the year ended January
31, 2001, we considered thier internal control, including control activities
for safeguarding securities, in order to determine our auditing procedures for
the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and to
comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on
internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and maintaining
internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments
by management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs
of controls.  Generally, controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the
entity's objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. Those controls include the
safeguarding of assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, error or fraud may occur
and not be detected.  Also, projection of any evaluation of internal control
to future periods is subject to the risk that it may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily disclose all
matters in internal control that might be material weaknesses under standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A
material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of one or
more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low
level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in amounts that
would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited may
occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal
course of performing their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters
involving internal control and its operation, including controls for
safeguarding securities, that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined
above as of January 31, 2001.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of management, the
Board of Directors of the Funds, and the Securities and Exchange Commission
and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these
specified parties.


March 8, 2001
Independent Auditors' Report


The Board of Trustees of the
Smith Barney Variable Account Funds:

In planning and performing our audits of the financial statements of the
Income and Growth, U.S. Government/High Quality Securities, and Reserve
Account Portfolios (the "Funds") of Smith Barney Variable Account Funds for
the year ended December 31, 2000, we considered its internal control,
including control activities for safeguarding securities, in order to
determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on
the financial statements and to comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR,
not to provide assurance on internal control.

The management of the Funds is responsible for establishing and maintaining
internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments
by management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs
of controls.  Generally, controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the
entity's objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. Those controls include the
safeguarding of assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, error or fraud may occur
and not be detected.  Also, projection of any evaluation of internal control
to future periods is subject to the risk that it may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily disclose all
matters in internal control that might be material weaknesses under standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A
material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of one or
more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low
level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in amounts that
would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited may
occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal
course of performing their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters
involving internal control and its operation, including controls for
safeguarding securities, that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined
above as of December 31, 2000.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of management, the
Board of Trustees of the Funds, and the Securities and Exchange Commission and
is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these
specified parties.


February 9, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000919557
<NAME> Smith Barney Aggressive Growth Portfolio
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER>014
   <NAME>Travelers Series Fund Inc.

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  Oct-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                       Oct-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>              159,094,653
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>             165,160,754
<RECEIVABLES>                        1,038,480
<ASSETS-OTHER>                             357
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     166,199,591
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>             1,462,186
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                      0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>              184,518
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                  1,646,704
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                              0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>           158,486,786
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>               10,951,474
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                        0
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                    0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                       0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                      0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                     0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>             6,066,101
<NET-ASSETS>                       164,552,887
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                       46,346
<INTEREST-INCOME>                      304,741
<OTHER-INCOME>                               0
<EXPENSES-NET>                         444,753
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                (93,666)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                35,728
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>            6,066,101
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                6,008,163
<EQUALIZATION>                               0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                    0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                     0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                    4,004
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>             11,051,217
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>            100,076
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                        333
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>             164,552,887
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                      0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                    0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                      0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                   0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                  355,785
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                        444,753
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                44,917,521
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                   10.000
<PER-SHARE-NII>                         (0.030)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                  5.070
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                     0.000
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                0.000
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                     0.010
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                     15.030
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                           0.99



</TABLE>
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19

- 0045 V

UNPUBLISHED

JEAN WINGARD

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: March 11, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;

Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine

Administration (SIRVA)

Jeffrey S. Pop, Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates, Beverly Hills, CA , for petitioner.

Claudia Barnes Gangi , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On January 8, 2019

, Jean Wingard filed a petition for compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. , 2 (the

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that s he suffered a left Shoulder Injury Related to

Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered

on October 20 , 2016 . Petit ion at 1 . The case was assigned to the Special Processing

Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On January 30, 2020

, R espondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he

concedes that P etitioner is entitled to compensa tion in this case. Respondent’s Rule

4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, R espondent concedes that Petitioner’s alleged injury is

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am

required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Managemen t and Promotion of

Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to

the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to

redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of

privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such

material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 19 86, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. §

300aa (2012 ).2 consistent with a SIRVA as defined on the Vacc ine Injury Table Id. at 3 . Respondent

further agrees that Petitioner suffered the residual effects of her condition for more than

six months

. Id.

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1291 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1291

    To reauthorize the Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 20, 2013

 Mr. Kind (for himself and Mr. Gerlach) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To reauthorize the Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF NEOTROPICAL MIGRATORY BIRD CONSERVATION 
              ACT.

    Section 10 of the Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Act (16 
U.S.C. 6109) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsections (a) and (b) and inserting the 
        following:
    ``(a) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Fund to carry out this Act such sums as are 
necessary for each of fiscal years 2014 through 2019, to remain 
available until expended, of which not less than 75 percent of the 
amounts made available for each fiscal year shall be expended for 
projects carried out outside the United States.''; and
            (2) by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as subsections 
        (b) and (c), respectively.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2018133EN.01002201.xml

| 16.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 133/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 133/22

---

Commission notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 133/06)

| Member State | France |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Le Puy-en-Velay – Paris (Orly) |
| Period of validity of the contract | From 14 January 2019 to 13 January 2023 |
| Deadline for the submission of applications and tenders | 3 July 2018 (12.00, local time) |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained | Syndicat mixte de gestion de l’aérodrome départemental Le Puy-en-Velay - Loudes |
| Mr Pascal Rey, Director |
| La Reilhade |
| 43320 Loudes |
| FRANCE |
| Tel. | +33 471086187
  +33 601446342 |

Member State

France

Route concerned

Le Puy-en-Velay – Paris (Orly)

Period of validity of the contract

From 14 January 2019 to 13 January 2023

Deadline for the submission of applications and tenders

3 July 2018 (12.00, local time)

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained

Syndicat mixte de gestion de l’aérodrome départemental Le Puy-en-Velay - Loudes

Mr Pascal Rey, Director

La Reilhade

43320 Loudes

FRANCE

Tel.

+33 471086187

+33 601446342

Fax +33 471086640

Email: direction@aerolepuy.fr

---
Steven Allen BRENDE, Petitioner v. Darin YOUNG, Warden, et al.;

No. 18-9713

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
STATE of North Carolina v. James GODFREY, Jr.

No. 82P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 1, 2004.

Mark Montgomery, for Godfrey.

William B. Crumpler, Assistant Attorney General, G. Dewey Hudson, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th day of February 2004 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of April 2004."
Gerald NELSON, Petitioner v. AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION LOCAL 1181-1061, AFL-CIO, et al.

No. 19-6074

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.8

                    FISCAL YEAR 2004 MANAGEMENT BONUS PLAN OF
                       HUTCHINSON TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED

Hutchinson Technology Incorporated ("HTI") has a management bonus plan that
covers executive officers and certain other management-level employees. The
decision to pay out bonuses is made annually by the Compensation Committee of
HTI's Board of Directors. The Committee's decision is based primarily on HTI's
attainment of quarterly earnings per share goals throughout the fiscal year, as
well as other factors that may be considered at the Committee's discretion.
Bonuses are paid in cash in the first quarter of the following fiscal year.

                                       28
Ralph Willard SAVOIE, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6314

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.a

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund V L.P. (the "Fund") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer of the Fund's general partner, Boston Capital Associates V, L.L.C., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                  
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.



|                  |  |                            
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:             |  |                            
|February 21, 2006 |  | /s/ John P. Manning        
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  | John P. Manning            
|                  |  | Principal Executive Officer
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  |                            



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of REGENCY, Inc., Bankrupt. William Henig, Trustee, Agnes Ford, Executrix of the Estate of L. Stanley Ford, Attorney for the Trustee, and Paul T. Huckin, Attorney for the Trustee, Appellants.

No. 11033.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued June 8, 1953.

Decided June 29, 1953.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 19, 1953.

Paul T. Huckin, Englewood, N. J., for appellants.

Abraham H. Sles, Jersey City, N. J. (Eichmann & Seiden, Jersey City, N. J., on the brief), -for appellee.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and KA-LODNER and STALEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

A careful examination of the record in this case and consideration of the briefs and oral arguments of counsel for the parties convince us that the court below committed no error. Accordingly, the judgment appealed from will be affirmed.
Miguel GRADO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5183

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of ENERGY HOLDINGS INTERNATIONAL, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report'), John Adair, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to section.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ John
Adair
 John
Adair, Chief Executive Officer
 Date: May
15, 2009
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Dennis G. McLaughlin, III, Chief Executive Officerof Earth Biofuels, Inc.(the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB ofthe Company for the six months ended June 30, 2006 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.
| Date: November 21, 2006 |                          |   |
|------------------------------|-------------------------------|--------|
|                         |                          |   |
|                              | /s/ Dennis G. McLaughlin, III |   |
|                         | Dennis G. McLaughlin, III     |   |
|                         | Chief Executive Officer       |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

 

----
MARITIME LIFE CARIBBEAN LIMITED, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-61

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Derek Tyler HORTON, Petitioner v. Sam COCHRAN

No. 19-6713

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.