alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



To the Board of Directors
Kellstrom Industries, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-20727, No. 333-41159 and No. 333-62247) on Form S-8 and in the registration
statements (No. 333-10313, No. 333-44019 and No. 333-52917) on Form S-3 of
Kellstrom Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated February 17,
1999, except as to Note 18, which is as of March 30, 1999, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Kellstrom Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of earnings,
stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998, and the related
financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 1998
annual report on Form 10-K of Kellstrom Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries.


                              KPMG LLP


Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
March 29, 1999
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q REPORT**

**OF**

**REDDY ICEHOLDINGS, INC.**

**PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(CHAPTER63, TITLE 18 U.S.C. SS.SS. 1350(a) AND (b))**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350(a) and (b)), each ofthe undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March  31, 2005 of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. (the‘‘Company’’) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:  May 16, 2005

 
| /s/ STEVEN J. JANUSEK |   |
|-----------------------|--------|

StevenJ. Janusek, Chief Financial Officer

 

The foregoing certification is being furnishedsolely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter63, Title 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350(a) and (b)), is not a part of the Form 10-Qto which it refers and is, to the extent permitted by law, provided by theabove signatory to the extent of his knowledge.

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwiseadopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic versionof this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided toReddy Ice Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Clive Barwin, President, CEO and Secretary of Melt Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| (1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Melt Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Melt Inc.                                                                       |

Dated:  August 12, 2005
| /s/ Clive Barwin |
|------------------|

Clive Barwin

President, CEO, Secretary and Director

(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“W hen denying relief, the court m ay hand down an opinion but 1

is not required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and m em orandum opinions).

NUMBER 13-09-00293-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE: TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL BOARDS, INC.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1

Relator, Texas Association of School Boards, Inc., filed a petition for writ of

mandamus in the above cause on June 1, 2009. The Court requested and received a

response to the petition for writ of mandamus from the real party in interest, and further

received a reply brief filed by relator. Relator has now filed an unopposed motion to

dismiss this original proceeding on grounds that the parties have settled and compromised

their dispute. Relator thus asks this Court to dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus as

moot. 
2

The Court, having examined and fully considered the unopposed motion to dismiss,

is of the opinion that relator has shown itself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the

unopposed motion to dismiss is GRANTED and the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby

DISMISSED as moot. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this 6th day of August, 2009.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.12

December 23, 2003


Mr. Russell McCann
9800 Richmond Avenue
Suite 680
Houston, Texas  77042

Dear Russell:

This letter shall serve as a conditional offer of employment to you by Franklin
Bank S.S.B ("Franklin") and Franklin Bank Corp. This offer is conditional upon
the happening of the initial public offering of Franklin Bank Corp (the "IPO").
Thus, if you accept this offer and the IPO occurs, this letter agreement will
take effect and supersede the prior letter agreement between you and by Franklin
setting forth certain terms of your employment. If the IPO does not occur, this
letter will be null and void and of no force and effect.

The above referenced offer is as follows:

Position:          Chief Financial Officer

Salary & Bonus:    Your current salary is $150,000 per annum and you will
                   participate in Franklin's bonus program with a 2004 target
                   of $75,000.

Restricted Stock:  In connection with the IPO, you will receive shares of
                   restricted stock of Franklin Bank Corp. as set forth in a
                   separate restricted stock award agreement

Expenses:          You will receive annual allowances as follows: auto --
                   $8,000 and club dues $5,000.

Severance:         Generally, you will receive a severance of six months'
                   salary continuation, if terminated by Franklin without cause
                   prior to a change of control. However, after a change of
                   control, you will be provided with severance and other
                   benefits under a change of control employment agreement in
                   accordance with the terms of that agreement, which is
                   attached hereto.

Please note that at no point in time will this letter or the offer that it
memorializes, serve as or be construed to grant you, a guarantee of employment
for any period of time. You will be at all times an employee at will.
<PAGE>
Please also note that this offer, and the above particulars, are subject to
Franklin's policies, any Franklin Bank Corp. Board of Directors' resolution or
directive regarding the same and the approval of Franklin Bank Corp.'s Board of
Directors.

Please confirm your acceptance of this offer of employment by signing this
letter where indicated and returning the executed original to our offices.
Should you have any questions about this offer of employment or the company,
please call the company at the above phone number.

Very truly yours,


By:  ____________________________
Name:  Anthony J. Nocella
Title: Chief Executive Officer

ACCEPTED:

_____________________________________   Date:   _____________________
Russell McCann
EXHIBIT 31.a

I, John P. Manning, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BCTC V Assignor Corp. (the "Assignor");
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Assignor as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The Assignor's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Assignor and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the Assignor, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the Assignor's disclosure controls and procedures  and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



1. The Assignor's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Assignor's auditors and the audit committee of the Assignor's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Assignor's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Assignor's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  November 14, 2006 | /s/ John P. Manning 
|------------------------ | --------------------
|                         | John P. Manning     
|                         | Director, President 
|                         | (Principal Executive
|                         | Officer), BCTC V    
|                         | Assignor Corp.
NEOLOGY, INC., Petitioner v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, et al.

No. 19-445

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Independent Auditors' Consent



To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
Consulting Group Capital Markets Funds:

We consent to the use of our report dated October 15, 1997 for 
Consulting Group Capital Markets Funds incorporated herein by reference 
and to the references to our Firm under the headings "Financial 
Highlights" in the Prospectus and "Counsel and Auditors" in the 
Statement of Additional Information.
 



	KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


New York, New York
December 29, 1997
III 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 82 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2014 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing a correction in the enrollment of S. 540. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill, S. 540, 

3 the Secretary of the Senate shall amend the title so as 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HCON 82 RDS 

1 to read: ‘‘To temporarily extend the public debt limit, and 

2 for other purposes.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 11, 

2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-50834

Summary Calendar

 

LUKE LEE, JR.,

Petitioner-Appellant-Cross-Appellee,

versus

JANIE COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, 

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee-Cross Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-99-CV-692-JN

--------------------

June 11, 2002

Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Luke Lee, Jr., appeals the district court’s denial of his 28

U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition. Lee argues that the

district court erred in refusing to consider the affidavits of

two jurors and in determining that the state court did not

unreasonably apply federal law in rejecting his claim of

ineffective assistance of counsel. The respondent also appeals,
No. 01-50834

-2-

arguing that the district court erred in holding that Lee’s

petition was timely filed.

It is unclear whether Lee’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition was

timely filed, as we have not addressed this specific finality

issue in a published opinion. However, even if we assume without

deciding that Lee’s § 2254 petition was timely filed, then Lee

still has not shown that he should receive relief. 

Lee contends that the district court erred in refusing to

consider affidavits from two jurors because these affidavits were

considered by the state trial court. The statements contained in

the disputed affidavits fall squarely within the class of

testimony forbidden by FED. R. EVID. 606(b). The district court

thus did not abuse its discretion in refusing to consider them. 

See Williams v. Collins, 16 F.3d 626, 636 (5th Cir. 1994); 

Weaver v. Puckett, 896 F.2d 126, 126-27 (5th Cir. 1990).

Lee’s final contention is that the state courts unreasonably

applied federal law in determining that his trial attorney did

not render ineffective assistance of counsel. He argues that

counsel rendered deficient performance based on his decision not

to present certain mitigating evidence and that this performance

prejudiced the defense. Counsel’s decision not to present the

disputed evidence was based on sound trial strategy. See

Jernigan v. Collins, 980 F.2d 292, 296 (5th Cir. 1992); Williams,

16 F.3d at 634. The state court’s conclusion that counsel did

not render a deficient performance thus does not constitute an
No. 01-50834

-3-

unreasonable application of federal law. See Neal v. Puckett,

286 F.3d 230, 246 (5th Cir. 2002) (en banc). The judgment of the

district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 4.1


 


Advisors Asset Management, Inc.

18925 Base Camp Road

Monument, Colorado 80132


July 24, 2019


 


Advisors Disciplined Trust 1952


c/o The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee


BNY Atlantic Terminal


2 Hanson Place, 12th Floor


Brooklyn, New York 11217


 


Re: Advisors Disciplined Trust 1952 (the “Fund”)


Ladies and Gentlemen:


We have examined
the Registration Statement File No. 333-230875 for the above captioned Fund. We hereby consent to the use in the Registration Statement
of the references to Advisors Asset Management, Inc. as evaluator.


You are hereby authorized
to file a copy of this letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	Advisors Asset Management, Inc.
	 	 
	 	 
	 	By                 /s/ ALEX R. MEITZNER            
	 	Alex R. Meitzner
	 	Senior Vice President
Daniel MARQUEZ, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5634

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Abelee BRONSON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5316

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition

Justice Sotomayor, with whom Justice Ginsburg joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari:

I dissent for the reasons set out in *Brown v. United States* , 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 14, 202 L.Ed.2d 302 (2018) ( Sotomayor, J., dissenting).
Troy DAVENPORT, Petitioner v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

No. 19-6206

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 122 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.122
                                     Agreed to December 13, 2014        

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 83, the Clerk of the House of 
Representatives shall amend the long title so as to read: ``Making 
consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
2015, and for other purposes.''.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
George R. DURHAM, Petitioner v. Josh SHAPIRO, Attorney General of Pennsylvania

No. 19-6733

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
John Steven GARDNER, Petitioner v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

No. 19-6298

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# Official Journal L 51/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.051.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 51 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5523 February 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.051.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 51

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5523 February 2012

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2012/88/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 25 January 2012 on the technical specification for interoperability relating to the control-command and signalling subsystems of the trans-European rail system
  (notified under document C(2012) 172)

   (1) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

2012/88/EU

*

Commission Decision of 25 January 2012 on the technical specification for interoperability relating to the control-command and signalling subsystems of the trans-European rail system
  (notified under document C(2012) 172)

   (1)

(notified under document C(2012) 172)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14



I, Stacy M. Riffe, Chief Financial Officer of the
registrant, certify that:



1. I have reviewed
this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sunset Financial Resources, Inc.;



2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge,
the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Stacy M. Riffe     
|Stacy M. Riffe         
|Chief Financial Officer
|                       
|Date: November 14, 2005