alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Edward Goldthorpe, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of BC Partners Lending Corporation;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	[Reserved]

(c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 14, 2022

|                         |
|-------------------------|
| /s/ Edward Goldthorpe   |
| Edward Goldthorpe       |
| Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-10066

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BILLY RAY CLARK,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:03-CR-423-ALL-R

--------------------

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Billy Ray

Clark has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as

required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Clark has

not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and

the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal. 

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel

is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL

IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 24, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
Independent Auditors' Report



To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
of Smith Barney Investment Funds Inc.:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements of the Smith
Barney Premier Selections Global Growth of Smith Barney Investment Funds Inc.
(the "Fund") for the year ended April 30, 2001, we considered its internal
control, including control activities for safeguarding securities, in order to
determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on
the financial statements and to comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR,
not to provide assurance on internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and maintaining
internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments
by management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs
of controls.  Generally, controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the
entity's objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. Those controls include the
safeguarding of assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, error or fraud may occur
and not be detected.  Also, projection of any evaluation of internal control
to future periods is subject to the risk that it may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily disclose all
matters in internal control that might be material weaknesses under standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A
material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of one or
more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low
level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in amounts that
would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited may
occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal
course of performing their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters
involving internal control and its operation, including controls for
safeguarding securities, that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined
above as of April 30, 2001.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of management, the
Board of Directors of the Fund, and the Securities and Exchange Commission and
is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these
specified parties.




New York, New York
June 8, 2001
Thomas F. SWEENEY, Petitioner v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD

No. 19-621

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 16, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
IN RE Steven BLEAU, Petitioner.

No. 19-5433.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.

Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
**Exhibit 32.2**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Merisant Company (the “Company”) for the period endedSeptember 30, 2007 (the “Report”),the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   |   | /s/ Diana S. Ferguson   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   | Diana S. Ferguson       |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   |   | November 13, 2007       |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1092 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 30
113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1092

                          [Report No. 113-97]

 To designate the air route traffic control center located in Nashua, 
New Hampshire, as the ``Patricia Clark Boston Air Route Traffic Control 
                               Center''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 12, 2013

 Ms. Kuster (for herself and Ms. Shea-Porter) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

                              June 5, 2013

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the air route traffic control center located in Nashua, 
New Hampshire, as the ``Patricia Clark Boston Air Route Traffic Control 
                               Center''.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF PATRICIA CLARK BOSTON AIR ROUTE TRAFFIC 
              CONTROL CENTER.

    (a) In General.--The air route traffic control center located in 
Nashua, New Hampshire, and any successor air route traffic control 
center at that location, shall be known and designated as the 
``Patricia Clark Boston Air Route Traffic Control Center''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the air route traffic 
control center referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a 
reference to the ``Patricia Clark Boston Air Route Traffic Control 
Center''.
                                                  House Calendar No. 30

113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1092

                          [Report No. 113-97]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate the air route traffic control center located in Nashua, 
New Hampshire, as the ``Patricia Clark Boston Air Route Traffic Control 
                               Center''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              June 5, 2013

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
# Official Journal L 129/2017

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 129 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6019 May 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 129

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6019 May 2017

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2017/825 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 on the establishment of the Structural Reform Support Programme for the period 2017 to 2020 and amending Regulations (EU) No 1303/2013 and (EU) No 1305/2013 | 1 |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2017/826 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 on establishing a Union programme to support specific activities enhancing the involvement of consumers and other financial services end-users in Union policy-making in the area of financial services for the period of 2017-2020 (
  1
  ) | 17 |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2017/827 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 amending Regulation (EU) No 258/2014 establishing a Union Programme to support specific activities in the field of financial reporting and auditing for the period of 2014-20 (
  1
  ) | 24 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) 2017/825 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 on the establishment of the Structural Reform Support Programme for the period 2017 to 2020 and amending Regulations (EU) No 1303/2013 and (EU) No 1305/2013

1

*

Regulation (EU) 2017/826 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 on establishing a Union programme to support specific activities enhancing the involvement of consumers and other financial services end-users in Union policy-making in the area of financial services for the period of 2017-2020 (
  1
  )

1

17

*

Regulation (EU) 2017/827 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 amending Regulation (EU) No 258/2014 establishing a Union Programme to support specific activities in the field of financial reporting and auditing for the period of 2014-20 (
  1
  )

1

24

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# Official Journal L 28/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 28 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6427 January 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 28

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6427 January 2021

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2021/41 of amending budget No 8 of the European Union for the financial year 2020 | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

*

Definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2021/41 of amending budget No 8 of the European Union for the financial year 2020

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6106

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. DONALD MCDUFFIN WILLIAMS , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. George L. Russell, III , District Judge. ( 1:16

- cr - 00165

- GLR

- 1; 1:19

- cv - 02378

- GLR )

Submitted : August 12, 2020 Decided: August 14, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, KING , Circuit Judge , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Donald McDuffin Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Donald McDuffin Williams seeks t o appeal the district court’s order denying relief

on his 28 U.S.C. § 225 5 motion . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)( B ). A certificate of appealability will no t issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by showing that reasonable jurists c ould find the district

cou rt’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is d ebatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude t hat Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability , deny the motion for remand, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in t he materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
James Allen EAPMON, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 18-8472

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1010 KA 11-01836**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, SCONIERS, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PATRICK E. MCDONALD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LEANNE LAPP, PUBLIC DEFENDER, CANANDAIGUA (CARA A. WALDMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

R. MICHAEL TANTILLO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, CANANDAIGUA (JAMES B. RITTS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (William F. Kocher, J.), rendered July 7, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (four counts).

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of four counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.39 [1]). Defendant’s contention that his plea was not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered is unpreserved for our review because he did not move to withdraw the plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction ( see People v Davis , 99 AD3d 1228, 1229, lv denied 20 NY3d 1010). Defendant’s further contention that County Court erred in refusing to suppress the identification made by a confidential informant from a photo array is also unpreserved for our review ( see People v Cruz , 89 AD3d 1464, 1465, lv denied 18 NY3d 993), and in any event that contention is without merit.

We reject defendant’s contention that the bargained-for sentence is unduly harsh and severe ( see generally People v Santiago , 1 AD3d 957, 957, lv denied 1 NY3d 601). Defendant correctly contends, however, that the uniform sentence and commitment sheet fails to specify whether that sentence is to run concurrently with or consecutively to the sentences imposed for crimes charged in a separate superior court information (SCI), to which he also pleaded guilty. The uniform sentence and commitment sheet therefore must be amended in accordance with the court’s directive at sentencing, i.e., to reflect that the sentence pertaining to the SCI is to be served consecutively to the sentence imposed herein ( see People v Jackson
,**-2- 1010 KA 11-01836** 

108 AD3d 1079, 1081).

Entered: October 4, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
**Exhibit 32.2**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Merisant Company (the “Company”) forthe period ended June 30, 2006 (the “Report”),the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        |   | /s/ Anthony J. Nocchiero |
|--------|--------|--------------------------|
|   |   | Anthony J. Nocchiero     |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer  |
|   |   | August 11, 2006          |

 

----
EXHIBIT
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350





(SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





I,
      Song
      Jinan, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of China-Biotics,
      Inc. (the "Registrant"), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based upon
      a
      review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008
      of the Registrant (the “Report”):





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of The
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


*/s/
                Song Jinan*Song
                JinanChief
                Executive OfficerNovember
                10, 2008
Lisa J. GILLARD, Petitioner v. ILLINOIS

No. 18-8927

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
# Official Journal L 301/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 301 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4931 October 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 301

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4931 October 2006

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1549/2006 of 17 October 2006 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1549/2006 of 17 October 2006 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.