alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 76 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J.Res.76

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                            Joint Resolution

 
   Making an emergency supplemental appropriation for the fiscal year 
  ending September 30, 2014, to provide funding to Israel for the Iron 
       Dome defense system to counter short-range rocket threats.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the following sum is 
appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise 
appropriated, for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2014, and for 
other purposes, namely:

                         DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

                              PROCUREMENT

                       Procurement, Defense-wide

    For an additional amount for ``Procurement, Defense-Wide'', 
$225,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2015, which shall 
be for the Secretary of Defense to provide to the Government of Israel 
for the procurement of the Iron Dome defense system to counter short-
range rocket threats:  Provided, That such funds shall be transferred 
immediately only through an exchange of letters to address emergent 
operations in support of Operation Protective Edge, notwithstanding 
section 3.1.3.2.1 of the U.S.-Israel Iron Dome Procurement Agreement:  
Provided further, That nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to 
apply to previously appropriated funds for the procurement of Iron 
Dome:  Provided further, That such amount is designated by the Congress 
as an emergency requirement pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(A)(i) of the 
Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985.
    This joint resolution may be cited as the ``Emergency Supplemental 
Appropriations Resolution, 2014''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERREDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC.PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(CHAPTER 98, TITLE 15 U.S.C. SS. 7241)**

I,William P. Brick, certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc.;

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; and

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)     Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)     Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)     Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b)     Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.

**Date: April 26,2007**
| /s/ WILLIAM P. BRICK                       |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| William P. Brick,  Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wannigan Ventures,    Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as    filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the    "Report"), I, Steven Pickett, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,    certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of    the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section    13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in    all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of    the Company.

Date: August 14, 2007

 

***/s/ Steven Pickett***

Name: Steven Pickett

Title: 

Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section    906 has been provided to Wannigan Ventures, Inc., and will be retained by    Wannigan Ventures, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange    Commission or its staff upon request.
Earl Lee DIXIE, Petitioner, v. Kenneth HARRINGTON, Warden.

No. 18-9440

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
| 1. | I am a duly authorized officer of BMW Financial Services NA, LLC; |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | I have reviewed the terms of that certain Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of January 24, 2018 (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”), among BMW Financial Services NA, LLC, as seller,                  servicer (in such capacity, the “Servicer”), administrator and custodian, U.S. Bank National Association, as indenture trustee, BMW FS Securities LLC, as depositor, and BMW Vehicle Owner Trust 2018-A, as issuer, and I have made, or have                  caused to be made under my supervision, a review of the activities of the Servicer and the performance of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement during the period from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | to the best of my knowledge, based on the review described in paragraph 2 above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material                  respects during the period from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

K.B.,

Petitioner

v.

J.J.W., JR.,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 203 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of July, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Robert J. WILSON, Petitioner, v. STATE BAR OF TEXAS.

No. 19-663

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District denied.
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1228 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 123 South 9th Street in De Pere, Wisconsin, 

as the ‘‘Corporal Justin D. Ross Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1228 EH

1 SECTION 1. CORPORAL JUSTIN D. ROSS POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 123 South 9th Street in De Pere, 

5 Wisconsin, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Cor6 poral Justin D. Ross Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Corporal Justin D. 

11 Ross Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 26, 

2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1228 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 123 South 9th Street in De 

Ross Post Office Building’’. Pere, Wisconsin, as the ‘‘Corporal Justin D.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of Z.K., A.K., and * From the 29th District Court

and M.K., children, of Palo Pinto County,

 Trial Court No. C47719.

No. 11-18-00302-CV * March 21, 2019

 * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

 (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

 Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

 sitting by assignment) 

 (Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is 

no error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the order of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
# C_2018269EN.01000201.xml

| 31.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/2

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case M.8797 — Thales/Gemalto)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 269/02)

On 23 July 2018, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the abovementioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the internal market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference No M.8797 — Thales/Gemalto, to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---
Melvin Lewis ANDREWS, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5026

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Yurie YAMANO, Petitioner v. HAWAII STATE JUDICIARY, et al.

No. 19-5850

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

The petition for rehearing is denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-30381

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FRANKIE MALDONADO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 1:14-CR-207-1

Before REAVLEY, GRAVES, and HO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Frankie Maldonado appeals his convictions on two counts of producing

child pornography and one count of traveling in interstate commerce for the 

purpose of engaging in sexual conduct with a minor. Maldonado asserts that 

the district court reversibly erred and violated the Confrontation Clause of the 

Sixth Amendment by applying Federal Rule of Evidence 412 to exclude on 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 29, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-30381 Document: 00514490712 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/29/2018
No. 17-30381

2

cross-examination evidence regarding the minor victim’s prior inconsistent

statement that she had previously engaged in other sexual behavior. 

First, he argues that the evidence was not “offered to prove that a victim 

engaged in other sexual behavior,” FED. R. EVID. 412(a)(1), but was offered for 

the purpose of impeaching the credibility of the minor victim, cf. FED. R. EVID. 

613(b). We need not decide whether the district court abused its discretion in 

applying the Rule 412(a) bar because, in any event, Maldonado has failed to 

show that the exclusion of the evidence affected his substantial rights. See

FED. R. EVID. 103(a); United States v. Tuma, 738 F.3d 681, 687-88 (5th Cir. 

2013). 

We likewise reject Maldonado’s contention that the evidence of the minor

victim’s prior inconsistent statement was nevertheless admissible under 

Rule 412(b)(1)(C) because its exclusion violated his constitutional right to 

cross-examine his accuser under the Confrontation Clause. Where, as here, a 

Confrontation Clause objection was not asserted in the district court, we 

review the issue for plain error only. See United States v. Acosta, 475 F.3d 677, 

680 (5th Cir. 2007); see also United States v. Gibson, 875 F.3d 179, 193 (5th 

Cir. 2017). The district court did not clearly or obviously violate Maldonado’s 

constitutional right of confrontation by excluding on cross-examination 

evidence of the minor victim’s prior inconsistent statement regarding her past 

sexual behavior. See United States v. Escalante-Reyes, 689 F.3d 415, 419 (5th 

Cir. 2012) (en banc); United States v. Hitt, 473 F.3d 146, 156-58 (5th Cir. 2006).

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 17-30381 Document: 00514490712 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/29/2018
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 05/14/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      143,702
COMMITMENTS
  36,326   26,788   13,549   75,842   80,691  125,717  121,029   17,985   22,674

CHANGES FROM 05/07/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,582)
   2,080    1,298     -446       59      231    1,692    1,082     -110      500

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    25.3     18.6      9.4     52.8     56.2     87.5     84.2     12.5     15.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      167)
      44       36       36       59       71      125      124
```

----

Updated May 17, 2013
Marvin F. TAYLOR, Petitioner, v. Ron NEAL, Superintendent, Indiana State Prison.

No. 19-5276

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

The petition for rehearing is denied.
Independent Auditors' Consent




To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of the
Smith Barney Mid Cap Core Fund.:
We consent to the incorporation by reference, in this Prospectus and
Statement of Additional Information, of our report dated January 14,
2000 on the statement of assets and liabilities for the Smith Barney
Mid Cap Core Fund (formerly known as the Smith Barney Mid Cap Blend
Fund) as of November 30, 1999 and the related statement of operations
for the year then ended and, the statements of changes in net assets
and financial highlights for the year then ended and for the period
September 1, 1998 (commencement of operations) to November 30, 1998.
These financial statements and financial highlights and our report
thereon are included in the Annual Report of the Fund as filed on Form
N-30D.
We also consent to the references to our firm under the headings
"Financial Highlights" in the Prospectus and "Auditors" in the
Statement of Additional Information.



KPMG LLP
New York, New York
August 16, 2000
Page
/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 21, 2014

No. 04-14-00062-CV

Steven STAMPS and Eva Stamps,

Appellants

v.

Alva Elia RUIZ,

Appellee

From the 365th Judicial District Court, Dimmit County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12-08-11759-DCVAJA

Honorable Amado J. Abascal, III, Judge Presiding

ORDER

After the court reported filed a notification of late reporter’s record, we ordered 

appellants to provide written proof to this court that the reporter’s fee has been paid or 

arrangements have been made to pay the reporter’s fee. The appellants have now filed written 

proof that arrangements have been made to pay the reporter’s fee. We therefore ORDER the 

court reporter, Patricia Salinas, to file the reporter’s record on or before May 21, 2014.

___________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of April, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Travell HENRY, Petitioner v. Patrick WARREN, Warden

No. 19-6731

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000919557
<NAME> TRAVELERS SERIES FUND INC.
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER> 10
   <NAME> MFS TOTAL RETURN PORTFOLIO

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                      627,105,792
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                     642,669,951
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,406,058
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                       0
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             649,076,009
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                    26,321,626
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                      926,002
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                         27,247,628
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                      0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                   567,361,219
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                       38,345,904
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                       28,475,906
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                   17,561,649
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                     21,311,252
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                    15,594,261
<NET-ASSETS>                               621,828,381
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                            6,244,763
<INTEREST-INCOME>                           15,944,306
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                               4,709,401
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                     17,479,668
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                    21,518,408
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                  (1,626,169)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                       37,371,907
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                   12,662,011
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                    29,755,229
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                      7,783,928
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                    514,619
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                          2,600,689
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                     159,554,603
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                     12,670,197
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                   29,621,868
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                        4,481,086
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                              4,709,401
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                       562,389,168
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                            16.23
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                  00.52
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                          00.72
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                             00.37
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                        00.88
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                              16.22
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                  00.84


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Gossamer Bio, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that: 

(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

|                                  |
|---------------------------------------|
| /s/ Sheila Gujrathi                   |
| Sheila Gujrathi, M.D.                 |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |

Date: March 22, 2019 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Christopher Ray PARRISH, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6721

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.