alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Richard P. Brown, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Atlantic Coast
Entertainment Holdings, Inc. (the Registrant) for the period ended March 31, 2005
(the Report);  2.
    Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this Report;  3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this Report;  4.
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:  (a)
    designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this Report is being prepared;(b)
    evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on
such evaluation; and(c)
    disclosed in this Report any changes in the
Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Registrants internal control over financial reporting.  5.
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)
    all significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and 1




---



##### 



(b)
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date: May 10, 2005 /s/  Richard P. BrownRichard P. BrownChief Executive Officer of Atlantic Coast
Entertainment Holdings, Inc. 2
#### RICHARD H. CHUTE v. J. W. DOWNS.1

July 23, 1909.

Nos. 16,220—(202).

Action in replevin in the district court for Dakota county to recover $1,000 for certain pine lumber and pine slabs, “being all the pine lumber and pine slabs now. to be found on or in the immediate vicinity of the sawmill owned and operated by said defendant.” The answer was a general denial. The case was tried before Crosby, J., who, at the close of plaintiff’s evidence, granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the action on the ground that plaintiff failed to establish any cause of action, the only evidence being a bill of sale and there being no *539evidence of title in the makers of the bill of sale to the lumber replevied. Plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was denied. Prom the judgment directing a return of the property or, in case it could not be returned, for $1,000, plaintiff appealed.

Affirmed.

*W. H.*Gillitt, for appellant.

*Hodgson, & Lowell,*for respondent.

1

 Reported in 122 N. W. 1134.

Per Cubiak.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover the possession or value of certain lumber and slabs, and based his right to recovery upon a bill of sale from numerous lumbermen owning and floating logs down the Mississippi river to points beyond Hastings. The bill of sale covered all stray logs. The only evidence offered to show that the lumber and slabs found in defendant’s possession came from the logs covered by the bill of sale, was that the slabs contained log marks of the various lumbermen who executed the same. There was no evidence whatever that the logs received by defendant, from which he manufactured the lumber in question, were stray logs. Por want of this proof the court dismissed the action, ■when the plaintiff rested, directing a judgment in defendant’s favor for a return of the property which had been taken from him in the claim and delivery proceedings, or for its value as alleged in the complaint and admitted in the answer, viz., $1,000. Plaintiff moved for a new trial and appealed from the order denying it.

The order must be affirmed. The absence of evidence showing that the lumber sought to be recovered in the action was manufactured by defendant from stray logs picked up in the Mississippi river, was fatal to plaintiff’s right to recover, and the evidence offered was insufficient to call upon defendant to explain from whence he obtained the logs. The ease would be entirely different if the action had been brought by the lumbermen, and evidence of their log marks on the slabs in defendant’s sawmill yards would have been sufficient to cast upon him the burden of explaining his possession. The pleadings admitted the value of the property and the court properly ordered judgment for its return, or the admitted value.

Order affirmed.

Jaggard, J. (dissenting). I dissent.
Johnny Lee JOHNSON, Petitioner v. William SPERFSLAGE.

No. 19-5351

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1376 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 25, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 369 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive in Jersey 

City, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Judge Shirley A. Tolentino 

Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1376 RFS

1 SECTION 1. JUDGE SHIRLEY A. TOLENTINO POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 369 Martin Luther King Jr. 

5 Drive in Jersey City, New Jersey, shall be known and des6 ignated as the ‘‘Judge Shirley A. Tolentino Post Office 

7 Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Judge Shirley A. 

12 Tolentino Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 24, 

2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
II 

Calendar No. 587 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1391 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 18, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

NOVEMBER 13, 2014 

Reported by Mr. CARPER, without amendment 

AN ACT 

Designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 25 South Oak Street in London, Ohio, as 

the ‘‘London Fallen Veterans Memorial Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LONDON FALLEN VETERANS MEMORIAL POST 

4 OFFICE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 25 South Oak Street in London, 

7 Ohio, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘London Fall8 en Veterans Memorial Post Office’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1391 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘London Fallen Vet5 erans Memorial Post Office’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS

smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 587 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1391 

AN ACT 

Designate the facility of the United States Postal 

morial Post Office’’. don, Ohio, as the ‘‘London Fallen Veterans MeService located at 25 South Oak Street in LonNOVEMBER 13, 2014 

Reported without amendment 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# Official Journal C 221A/14 S

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 221A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4914 September 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 221A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4914 September 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| 2006/C 221A/1 | Notice to readers | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

2006/C 221A/1

Notice to readers

1

---

| | III   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2006/C 221A/2 | Notice of open competitions EPSO/AD/63-66/06 to constitute a reserve of lawyer-linguists (AD7) with main languages Estonian, Latvian, Lithuanian and Slovenian | 3 |

III   Notices

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2006/C 221A/2

Notice of open competitions EPSO/AD/63-66/06 to constitute a reserve of lawyer-linguists (AD7) with main languages Estonian, Latvian, Lithuanian and Slovenian

EPSO/AD/63-66/06

(AD7)

3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Independent Auditors' Consent




To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Smith Barney Managed Governments Fund:
We consent to the incorporation by reference, in this
Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information, of
our report dated September 14, 1999, on the statement
of assets and liabilities for the Smith Barney Managed
Governments Fund (the Fund) as of July 31, 1999 and
the related statement of operations for the year then
ended, the statements of changes in net assets for
each of the years in the two-year period then ended
and the financial highlights for each of the years in
the five-year period then ended.  These financial
statements and financial highlights and our report
thereon are included in the Annual Report of the Fund
as filed on Form N-30D.
We also consent to the references to our firm under
the headings "Financial Highlights" in the Prospectus
and "Auditors" in the Statement of Additional
Information.



K
PMG
LLP
New York, New York
November 22, 1999
Page
Rakeem Asaad DAVIS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6684

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of *Rehaif* v. *United States,* 588 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 2191, 204 L.Ed.2d 594 (2019).
STATE of North Carolina v. Michael Eugene REED, II.

No. 232P01-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 1, 2004.

Mark L. Killian, Newton, for Reed.

*17Buren R. Shields, III, Assistant Attorney General, James C. Gaither, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 1st day of March 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of April 2004."
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T FEB RUARY 13, 2012 J OHN L EY CL ERK [DO NOT PUB LISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR T HE ELE VENTH C IRC UIT

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ No. 0 9-1638 9 Non-Argum ent C al en da

r

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ D. C . Doc ke t No . 08-20 767-C R-UU UNITED STAT ES OF AME RIC A, Pla int iff-Appe lle e, ve rsus EDUAR DO LOPEZ-HE RNA

NDEZ, a. k.a . R as hy , De fend ant-Appe lla nt.

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ Appe alfrom

the Uni te d Sta

te s Di stri ct

Co urt for theSouth ern Dist

ric t of Fl orida

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ (Februa ry 13, 2012 ) Be fore B ARKETT, W ILSON an d ANDE RSON, Ci rcui t Ju dge s. PER C URIAM : Alvi n E. E nti n, a

ppoi nte d c ouns elfor Edua rdo Lo pe z-He rnan de z in t hisdire ct

c rim ina l a

ppe al , ha s m ove d to wit

hdra w from furthe r repre se ntatio n of t he ap pe lla nt a nd h as file d a

brie f pursua

nt t o Ande rs v . C

ali for nia , 386 U.S. 73 8, 87 S.C t. 1 396, 18 L .Ed.2 d 49 3 (196 7). Our i nde pe nde nt re vie w of th e entire
rec ord re ve al s th at

c ouns el ’s a sse ssm ent of t he rel at ive m eri t of t

he a ppe alis
co rrec t. B ec au se ind ep en de nt e xam inatio n of t he e nti re re co rd rev ea ls n o is sue s of argu ab le m eri t, c ouns el ’s m oti on t o wi thd raw i s GRA NTE D , a

nd Lo pe zHe rnan de z’ s c onvi ct ion

and s ente nc e are AFFIRM ED.

2
IN RE Christopher HADSELL, Petitioner.

No. 18-1472.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Exhibit
      32.2


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report
      of Green Energy Holding Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'), I, Robert
      A. Hildebrand, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      USC ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004,
      that to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








Dated:
      November 13, 2007


/s/
      Robert A. Hildebrand


Robert A. Hildebrand, Chief Financial Officer
EX-10.14





 Exhibit 10.14 

April 30, 2019 
 Rekha Hemrajani 

Dear Rekha: 
 This letter is with regard to the separation and
consulting agreement (the “Agreement”) between you and FLX Bio, Inc. (the “Company”) dated March 19, 2019. Under Section 4 of the Agreement, you agreed to repay the Company, within 30 days (i.e., by April 18,
2019), a total of $133,566.95 of principal and accrued interest (the “Loan Amount) owed by you to the Company. 
 On April 18, 2019, you requested
that the Company extend the due date for the Loan Amount and reduce the portion of the Loan Amount to be repaid in cash to $73,004.79 and accept 178,124 of the shares pledged as collateral by The Sanjay Popli & Rekha Hemrajani Revocable
Living Trust in satisfaction the remaining balance of $60,562.16, based on the original $0.34 per share purchase price for such shares. 
 Section 4 of
the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 
 “4. PROMISSORY NOTE.
You entered into a Limited Recourse Promissory Note effective June 15, 2016 by which you became indebted to the Company in the amount of $255,000. The principal amount of the loan under the Promissory Note was reduced on February 13,
2018 in connection with the repurchase by the Company from The Sanjay Popli & Rekha Hemrajani Revocable Living Trust of 50,000 shares of common stock of the Company and on March 19, 2019 in connection with the repurchase by the Company
from The Sanjay Popli & Rekha Hemrajani Revocable Living Trust of 321,876 shares of common stock of the Company. The Company agrees to reduce the amount of accrued interest payable by you under the Promissory Note by $4,669.15 (the
“Interest Reduction Amount”). You acknowledge and agree that the Interest Reduction Amount will be a taxable benefit paid by the Company to you. After taking into account the Interest Reduction Amount, the amount of principal and accrued
interest outstanding on the loan as of the Separation Date is $133,566.95 (the “Outstanding Loan Amount”). Pursuant to the Promissory Note, you must repay the outstanding principal amount of the loan, plus interest, immediately upon your
voluntary termination of services to the Company. You acknowledge that you are voluntarily terminating your services to the Company as of the Separation Date and agree to satisfy in full the Outstanding Loan Amount by (a) paying $73,004.79 in
cash to the Company by May 3, 2019 and causing the transfer to the Company of 178,124 of the shares pledged as collateral by The Sanjay Popli & Rekha Hemrajani Revocable Living Trust.” 

  
 1 













 If the foregoing is acceptable to you, please sign below, cause the execution of the enclosed stock powers
on behalf of the The Sanjay Popli & Rekha Hemrajani Revocable Living Trust and return the originals to me. 
 Sincerely, 

 

			
	By:	 	 /s/ Brian Wong

		 	Brian Wong, M.D., Ph.D.
		 	Chief Executive Officer

 I HAVE READ, UNDERSTAND AND AGREE
FULLY TO THE FOREGOING AGREEMENT: 
  

			
	/s/ Rekha Hemrajani                	  	April 30, 2019
	Rekha Hemrajani	  	Date


  
 2
TM U I1ED STATES IS RIC COUKT

FOR THE EASTER DXST&XCT Oi H: \

vler dtvtsioN

AHXEL D CnLLAREh

He n v 4 A j

O 11 A c s o h o. (x) 2 H C. v • 2 3

01UTEM1 lNObE. .v §

tkcxwV 5

LMbHlFF'S MOTIO FOR LE VE TO ILE Ah)

A E l ED CorMPLAl/VT

Pi vnlvIF bnnse,\ d C Hard j PursuciwA To Fed. R. C i j , P.

I (qA ftn<L FFvvS C urTSi XarvuaM 30' » 202 eTiciencV

Order (EOF fes P<zc i-Fu Hf Ce uesP le v-e To 'ft ) an

a ended Co pia F m cr ole To Coiy p wi "FKa. ruhn 

Op Senior sTncT Judge B« M. 0- Lynru o I T I /or hern

Oi VricA o 4 TeK<as Ci i I Ac n Z? 7 , T " c u- 00 &l~ d an J

T 2 - ci/ - 10- M\

I. ke Pl cun 4 4 <f\ ki-S MerrfleJ Ahn ndeJ Co>V lp in4

Case 6:24-cv-00023-JDK-JDL Document 8 Filed 03/07/24 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 7
( E C F o I n co r Pzi ra J b 1 <2 e. res C€ ls< l cv $l-M- bp 

' ftm d bo b'l Lump sn ex S fi d - e dan I.

Z. Since tka. fmn disPosi io o k +k b o i n

Te Por r' Fies rcunin 3 O'fda ( ECF A . 2 '1 an J 2 3 ~1' ] ~c.V 

t

ts, \a -f xas eb r sn d k a ke does A D T

wi h do oPen a a/EV s id i Atidh r add new cl -f ndan-k &r

G.laiflns4 a Vkis dime becaasa bke i u Pr s / 

(ECF Nos; 2 >3. and Li PiaiAbd-kS Mo h n or TR fir being

fresended ia an urrend Surd ¦ Z v 1 Ac4io/a ta < 7 ! ?-c S «•

a e Ata. 2 2 I0Hl> hud l .L no t b en ( cPaally de id d

3S VatAdidds iWadiOK Far TR.0 and VKjl QckivewiI ftL-diors ( ECF Alo. XU Crv11 Ac Vioa 7 i d c y- PM d)

qvxA A- a\ Ceas bJo 22- IO7dO Q<r qb me drrcably

• »

Ihdcr d tv ine 

PLblHVLrF S b OTlQ TO TRAb FEff VE UF

Pursuand do 2B> LLS C. 1 07 } Pia hfd

rc t sd dhad dlna Qclion be RANSF RR D a h .

Case 6:24-cv-00023-JDK-JDL Document 8 Filed 03/07/24 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 8
U n» ei S- e es rvc Cou - For FW b/o -H- r 

vsFrjc oF T X S i FJiciii'Fa F l/x bs /Sro > Pff<

«.

Proc edi s'.

t J •

§| O ks to Pr ven F wq -W o C Fnne » ener > ar 

money » (?nd o PrWecd h-hgan s r- jFru reJ > QnJ Fka,

PuVhc qains-F unneces ary lAtonve ience and e pense.

an busen V. barrack) 31b U.S bi 2 i ib ( I fe ).

HonnTiF F a set s 'tlna F FlZ has blo reso rces 

an Can lO - ForcI H IrhiS dc 1 /.s neu? c-honfc)

SPeciaA irtce ke ever In Vend +o -Pi (4

Car plain-k \&tnVi P aho sserk i 4 1 A is ind SeA'h

an Proce din fro Se... GoU)liana I

* /

lilt gallons i u i J

On ly compound cs l y/nan s-krl S; an vuou

« i

unnecessarily incan/cmcna FW Pu hc.

bLAlHTlFF S MOTIOhl k OLUNTARY DIS ISSAL

In T e Wrna ei Plounli'f'f Fe e WWilly reaae l

¦F i CourT dismis h/s aclion ITAOU T _PRETUbljCH

Case 6:24-cv-00023-JDK-JDL Document 8 Filed 03/07/24 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 9
-Vu -f Su bmi- led i

r\ e\ (Yt arcl

c rue 1 b. b Urd 0iW2S5

ur K J< Mickuil ns 

2 UH F. . 205 

"Tcnfs sSce CoIon > leXas 75BS 

Case 6:24-cv-00023-JDK-JDL Document 8 Filed 03/07/24 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 10
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed October 29, 2013.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-12-01101-CV

MICHAEL HILL, Appellant

V.

SHERMCO INDUSTRIES, Appellee

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-10-04535

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Moseley, Lang, and Brown 

Opinion by Justice Brown

In an order dated September 13, 2013, the Court struck appellant’s brief as deficient and 

instructed him to file an amended brief within thirty days of the date of the order. We cautioned 

appellant that failure to file an amended brief within the time requested would result in dismissal 

of his appeal without further notice. 

As of today’s date, appellant has not filed an amended brief. Accordingly, we dismiss the 

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1) & 42.3(c).

121101F.P05

/Ada Brown/

ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

MICHAEL HILL, Appellant

No. 05-12-01101-CV V.

SHERMCO INDUSTRIES, Appellee

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas.

Trial Court Cause No. DC-10-04535.

Opinion delivered by Justice Brown. 

Justices Moseley and Lang, participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee, SHERMCO INDUSTRIES, recover its costs of this 

appeal from appellant, MICHAEL HILL.

Judgment entered this 29th day of October, 2013.

/Ada Brown/

ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
Independent Auditors' Consent



To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Smith Barney Concert Allocation Series Inc.:

We consent to the use of our report dated March 17, 1998 for the 
Select High Growth, Select Growth, Select Balanced, Select 
Conservative, and Select Income Portfolios of the Smith Barney Concert 
Allocation Series Inc. incorporated herein by reference and to the 
references to our Firm under the headings "Financial Highlights" in 
the Prospectus and "Counsel and Auditors" in the Statement of 
Additional Information.




	KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


New York, New York
April 21, 1998