alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018073EN.01000901.xml

| 27.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/9

---

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006
   (1)
  )

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006

1

)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 73/08)

Decisions granting an authorisation

Decisions granting an authorisation

| Reference of the decision (2) | Date of decision | Substance name | Holder of the authorisation | Authorisation number | Authorised use | Date of expiry of review period | Reasons for the decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C(2018) 974 | 20 February 2018 | Sodium dichromate
  EC No 234-190-3
  CAS No 7789-12-0 10588-01-9 | Total Raffinerie Mitteldeutschland GmbH, Maienweg 1, D-06237 Leuna, Germany | REACH/17/31/0 | Use of sodium dichromate as a corrosion inhibitor in ammonia absorption deep cooling system of a methanol synthesis plant | 21 September 2029 | In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socioeconomic benefits outweigh the risk to human health arising from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies for the applicant before the sunset date |

Reference of the decision (2)

2

Date of decision

Substance name

Holder of the authorisation

Authorisation number

Authorised use

Date of expiry of review period

Reasons for the decision

C(2018) 974

20 February 2018

Sodium dichromate

EC No 234-190-3

CAS No 7789-12-0 10588-01-9

Total Raffinerie Mitteldeutschland GmbH, Maienweg 1, D-06237 Leuna, Germany

REACH/17/31/0

Use of sodium dichromate as a corrosion inhibitor in ammonia absorption deep cooling system of a methanol synthesis plant

21 September 2029

In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socioeconomic benefits outweigh the risk to human health arising from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies for the applicant before the sunset date

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

1

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/chemicals/reach/about/index_en.htm

2

---
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, John J. McDonnell, Jr., certify that:

 

1. I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TNS, Inc.;

 

2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3  Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and have:

 

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a. Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonable likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b. Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

DATE: May 17, 2004

 
| /s/    John J. McDonnell, Jr. |                    |
|-----------------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                                    | John J. McDonnell, Jr.  |   |
|                                    | Chairman and            |   |
|                                    | Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                                         |                         |  |  |

 

----
Earnest Lee LANGSTON, Petitioner, v. MISSOURI BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE.

No. 19-6032

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 21, 2020

The petition for rehearing is denied.
PFIZER INC., et al., Petitioners v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, County of Los Angeles, et al.

No. 19-278

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.
# CA2004317EN.01000101.xml

| 22.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 317/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 317/1

---

NOTICE TO READER

Image

---
EXHIBIT 31

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David J. Cutler, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Atomic Paintball, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as  defined  in  Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for the
registrant and I have:

    a)     designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure that
           material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,  including  its
           consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
           entities,  particularly  during the  period in which  this  quarterly
           report is being prepared;

    b)     evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
           and  procedures  as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date
           of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

    c)     presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
           the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of
           the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

    a)     all  significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
           controls which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
           record,  process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
           identified for the registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
           internal controls; and

    b)     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
           employees who have a  significant role in  the  registrant's internal
           controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this report
whether or not there were significant  changes in internal  controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: August 12, 2008


By:      /s/ David J. Cutler
         ----------------------------------
         David J. Cutler
         Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Terrence HILL, Petitioner, v. CITY OF JACKSON, Michigan, et al.

No. 18-963

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Steven E. DAVIS, et al., Petitioners v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, et al.

No. 19-332

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### JAN 29 2003 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. STEVEN E. SHAFER,

Defendant - Appellant. No. 02-6129 D.C. No. CIV-00-1250-M and CR-99-16-M (W.D. Oklahoma)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before EBEL , BALDOCK , and LUCERO , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materiallyassist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.-2-

Steven E. Shafer was convicted of the knowing receipt of videotapes transmitted through interstate commerce that depict ed minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252( a)(2). He did not appeal his conviction, but did file a motion pursuant to 28 U. S.C. § 2255 attacking his sentence. The district court denied relief in an o rder dated March 29, 2002,

see R., Vol. I at 185-94, and also failed to issue a c ertificate of appealability, which we deem a denial of the same. See United States v. Kennedy , 225 F.3d 1187, 1193 n.3 (10th Cir. 2000). Shafer must obtain a certificate of appealability t o pursue his appeal in this court, as required by the provisions of the Anti-Te rrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act. See id. at 1193. Before we grant the certificate, he “mus t make a ‘substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.’” See id. (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2)). On appeal, Shafer raises three issues. He argues that: 1) he was wrongly denied proper notice of certain a dditional conditions of his supervised release, 2) his receipt of the videotape s did not implicate interstate commerce, and 3) his counsel’s representation was i neffective in four ways. After careful consideration of Shafer’s arguments and the record on appeal in light of applicable law, we conclude that he has not demonstrated entitlement-3-

to a certificate of appealability under the above s tandard. His request for a certificate of appealability is DENIED, and this appeal is DISMISSED.
Entered for the Court
Bobby R. Baldock Circuit Judge
STATE of North Carolina v. Derrick Tyrone SHELTON.

No. 538P03-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 4, 2004.

Derrick Tyrone Shelton, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Clark Everett, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 20th day of January 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Pitt County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of March 2004."
Ronson Kyle BUSH, Petitioner, v. Tommy SHARP, Interim Warden.

No. 19-7455.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Brandon Lashon INGRAM, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6715

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# 4 FA
- BETH LANG- IER TICE Order issued November , 2012

In The 

## Truth of Apptatz ITi1tI listrirt ni txtus at Dallas

No. 05-12-00944-CV IN THE INTEREST OF P.E., C.E., C.E., AND S.E., CHILDREN 

### ORDER The Court DENIES court reporter Kim Allen's sanctions motion which was included in her November 1, 2012 response to Father' s motion to review the trial court' s order sustaining the contest to the affidavit of indigence
Miguel Angel VEGA-TORRES, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6414

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Human Genome Research Institute Special Emphasis Panel; New and Early Career Genomic Investigators.                    

*Date:*                         July 22, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Suite 300, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Rudy O. Pozzatti, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Suite 300, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-1580,                         *pozzattr@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 14, 2022.

Melanie J. Pantoja,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-13137 Filed 6-16-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Timothy L. JOE, petitioner, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 19-5879.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 21, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2





Certification of the Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of K-Fed Bancorp (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dustin Luton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the company’s financial condition and results of operations.











Date: November 15, 2010
/s/ Dustin LutonDustin LutonChief Financial Officer
# Official Journal C 177A/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 177A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6223 May 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 177A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6223 May 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2019/C 177 A/01 | Notice Of Open Competition — EPSO/AD/373/19 — Administrators (AD 5) | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2019/C 177 A/01

Notice Of Open Competition — EPSO/AD/373/19 — Administrators (AD 5)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 21

- 00191

- CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding 141st District Court of Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 141

- 316567

- 20

Before Wallach, Birdwell, and Womack, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### I N RE 

### JMJ D EVELOPMENT 

### , LLC AND 

### T IM 

### B ARTON 

### , Relator s2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator s’ petition for writ o f mandamus , real parties in

interest ’ s response, relators ’ reply, and the record and is of the opinion that relief

should be denied. Accordingly, relator s’ petition for writ of mandamus is denied. All
previous orders of this court granting temporary relief in conjunction with this
petition for mandamus are withdrawn

.

Per Curiam

Delivered : July 15, 2021
Quentin PERRY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9460

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
# Official Journal C 13/18 J

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 13 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4918 January 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 13

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4918 January 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2006/C 013/1 | Opinion No 10/2005 on the draft Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities | 1 |
| 2006/C 013/2 | Opinion No 11/2005 on the draft Commission Regulation amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities | 9 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Court of Auditors

2006/C 013/1

Opinion No 10/2005 on the draft Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities

1

2006/C 013/2

Opinion No 11/2005 on the draft Commission Regulation amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities

9

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN