alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 88 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.88
                                         Agreed to April 3, 2014        

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR SOAP BOX DERBY RACES.

    (a) In General.--The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Association 
(in this resolution referred to as the ``sponsor'') shall be permitted 
to sponsor a public event, soap box derby races (in this resolution 
referred to as the ``event''), on the Capitol Grounds.
    (b) Date of Event.--The event shall be held on June 14, 2014, or on 
such other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate jointly designate.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board, the event shall be--
        (1) free of admission charge and open to the public; and
        (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The sponsor shall assume full 
responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all 
activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the 
sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, 
sound amplification devices, and other related structures and equipment 
as may be required for the event.

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

    The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board are 
authorized to make such additional arrangements as may be required to 
carry out the event.

SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1036 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1036

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 103 Center Street West in Eatonville, Washington, as the ``National 
              Park Ranger Margaret Anderson Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NATIONAL PARK RANGER MARGARET ANDERSON POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 103 Center Street West in Eatonville, Washington, shall be 
known and designated as the ``National Park Ranger Margaret Anderson 
Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``National 
Park Ranger Margaret Anderson Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 24, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1036

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 103 Center Street West in Eatonville, Washington, as the ``National 
              Park Ranger Margaret Anderson Post Office''.
```
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0002225 23-APR-2014 09:32 AM
Jason JONES, Petitioner, v. Martha UNDERWOOD, Warden.

No. 18-9495

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018353EN.01000201.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 353/2 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.8989 — Sony/EMI Music Publishing)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 353/02)

1.

On 21 September 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018353EN.01000201-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Sony Corporation of America (‘Sony’, United States), belonging to the group Sony, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | EMI Music Publishing (‘EMI MP’, United Kingdom). |

Sony acquire(s) within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of EMI MP.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Sony: U.S. subsidiary of Sony Corporation of Japan, which, directly and through its subsidiaries, is active globally in various businesses, including electronics products, games, entertainment services – including motion pictures, television programming, recorded music, and music publishing –, and financial services,

—   for EMI MP: music publishing business jointly controlled by Sony and Mubadala, whose catalogue has been administered by Sony/ATV Music Publishing (‘Sony/ATV’) since 2012.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.8989 — Sony/EMI Music Publishing

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| E-mail: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018353EN.01000201-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---
exv10w16



 



Exhibit 10.16


FIRST AMENDMENT

TO THE

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

OF KEVIN E. BENSON



     This agreement when countersigned by you will constitute an amendment to
the employment agreement between you and Laidlaw Inc. dated as of September 16,
2002 (hereinafter the “Benson Employment Agreement”).


     This amendment has been approved by the Board of Directors of Laidlaw
International, Inc. at its meeting held on November 19, 2003.


     The Benson Employment Agreement is hereby amended by replacing the
existing paragraph (b) in “ARTICLE 4 – COMPENSATION” in its entirety with the
following paragraph (b):



	 	(b)	 	The Executive will be eligible to participate in LINC’s Short
Term Incentive Plan. For fiscal years commencing September 1, 2002
and thereafter, the Executive’s target bonus shall be 100% of Base
Salary and the maximum bonus shall be 200% of Base Salary. The
Executive’s right to receive any bonus under LINC’s Short Term
Incentive plan shall be determined based only upon measurements
established by the Committee after consultation with the Executive
and as set forth in accordance with LINC’s Short Term Incentive
Plan.



     The parties to the Benson Employment Agreement have executed this
Agreement to be effective as of November 19, 2003.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	LAIDLAW INTERNATIONAL, INC.
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	
By:
	 	/s/ Richard P. Randazzo
	 	 	 	 	

	 	 	 	 	    Richard P. Randazzo
	 	 	 	 	    Chairman of the Human Resources
	 	 	 	 	    and Compensation Committee
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	EXECUTIVE
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ Kevin E. Benson
	 	 	

	 	 	Kevin E. Benson
Gregory WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6636

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Dawn Marie DELEBREAU, Petitioner v. Cristina DANFORTH, et al.

No. 18-1461

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 16, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
Arthur CONNER, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19M85

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Trinidad NANEZ-RIVERA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9459

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Belarus

                    On June 16, 2006, by Executive Order 13405, the President declared a national emergency pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701*et seq*.) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States constituted by the actions and policies of certain members of the Government of Belarus and other persons to undermine Belarus's democratic processes or institutions, manifested in the fundamentally undemocratic March 2006 elections; to commit human rights abuses related to political repression, including detentions and disappearances; and to engage in public corruption, including by diverting or misusing Belarusian public assets or by misusing public authority.                 

On August 9, 2021, by Executive Order 14038, I expanded the scope of the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13405, finding that the Belarusian regime's harmful activities and long-standing abuses aimed at suppressing democracy and the exercise of human rights and fundamental freedoms in Belarus—including illicit and oppressive activities stemming from the August 9, 2020, fraudulent Belarusian presidential election and its aftermath, such as the elimination of political opposition and civil society organizations and the regime's disruption and endangering of international civil air travel—constituted an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. 

The actions and policies of certain members of the Government of Belarus and other persons, and the Belarusian regime's harmful activities and long-standing abuses, continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. For this reason, the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13405, which was expanded in scope in Executive Order 14038, must continue in effect beyond June 16, 2022. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13405.

                    This notice shall be published in the                     *Federal Register*                     and transmitted to the Congress.                

[FR Doc. 2022-13034

Billing code 3395-F2-P
Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

BILL OF COSTS

No. 01-14-00601-CV

Rosehurst Homeowners Association 

v.

Hughes Natural Gas, Inc. and Real Provencher

NO. 980,933 IN THE CO CIVIL CT AT LAW NO 2 OF HARRIS COUNTY

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

SUPP CLK RECORD

RPT RECORD

STATEWIDE EFILING

FILING

CLK RECORD

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$103.00

$195.00

$20.00

$175.00

$200.00

06/08/2015

05/14/2015

03/23/2015

11/18/2014

11/04/2014

10/22/2014

08/31/2014

08/13/2014

08/13/2014

08/06/2014

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

ANT

ANT

APE

ANT

APE

APE

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

The costs incurred on appeal to the First Court of Appeals Houston, Texas are 

$743.00.

Court costs in this case have been taxed in this Court’s judgment

I, Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, do hereby 
certify that this is a true statement of the costs of appeal in this case.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my 

hand and the seal of the Court of Appeals for the 

First District of Texas, this October 2, 2015.
## F I F T H 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D 2 3

- 1468
LT Case No. 2020

- DP

- 001573
CORRECTED

_____________________________

G.T., F ATHER O F E.T., A C HILD

,

Appellant,

v.

D EPARTMENT O F C HILDREN A ND F AMILIES

,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County

. Kelly J. McKibben , Judge

.

Richard F. Joyce, Special Assistant Regional Counsel, of Office of Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, Casselberry , for Appellant.

Kelley Schaeffer, of Department of Children and Families

, Bradenton , for Appellee.

Sara E. Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals , and Amanda Glass, Senior Attorney, of St atewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for the Office of the Guardian a d Litem.

September 2 2 , 2023

P ER C URIAM

.

A FFIRMED

. See Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a)

E DWARDS

, C.J.

, J AY

, and B OATWRIGHT

, JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or

9.331

.

_____________________________
# C_2018398EN.01000202.xml

| 5.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8977 — Lone Star/Imerys TC)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 398/04)

On 4 October 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8977. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8977. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
[ARTICLE] 6
[CIK] 0000880583
[NAME] TRAVELERS QUALITY BOND PORTFOLIO
[SERIES]
   [NUMBER] 007
   [NAME] THE TRAVELERS SERIES TRUST
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   YEAR
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1999
[PERIOD-END]                               DEC-31-1999
[INVESTMENTS-AT-COST]                       59,331,742
[INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE]                      58,336,744
[RECEIVABLES]                                1,025,711
[ASSETS-OTHER]                                  22,877
[OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS]                                 0
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                              59,385,332
[PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES]                             0
[SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT]                              0
[OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES]                       46,949
[TOTAL-LIABILITIES]                             46,949
[SENIOR-EQUITY]                                      0
[PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON]                    58,618,583
[SHARES-COMMON-STOCK]                        5,484,185
[SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR]                        3,301,090
[ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT]                    2,975,583
[OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII]                               0
[ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS]                    (1,260,682)
[OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS]                             0
[ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC]                     (995,101)
[NET-ASSETS]                                59,338,383
[DIVIDEND-INCOME]                                1,908
[INTEREST-INCOME]                            3,250,813
[OTHER-INCOME]                                       0
[EXPENSES-NET]                                 276,293
[NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME]                      2,976,428
[REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT]                   (1,261,527)
[APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT]                  (1,118,482)
[NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS]                          596,419
[EQUALIZATION]                                       0
[DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME]                          854
[DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS]                       264,169
[DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER]                                0
[NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD]                      2,774,520
[NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED]                    616,330
[SHARES-REINVESTED]                             24,905
[NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS]                      23,830,988
[ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR]                            854
[ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR]                      264,169
[OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR]                              0
[OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR]                           0
[GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES]                          194,293
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                   0
[GROSS-EXPENSE]                                276,293
[AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS]                        50,758,790
[PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN]                            10.76
[PER-SHARE-NII]                                   0.64
[PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC]                         (0.51)
[PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND]                              0.00
[PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS]                         0.07
[RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL]                                 0
[PER-SHARE-NAV-END]                              10.82
[EXPENSE-RATIO]                                   0.54
</TABLE>
Jerald HARRIS, Petitioner, v. Richard JENNINGS, Warden.

No. 19-8208.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 26, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Nelli KESOYAN, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6383

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

WRITTEN STATEMENT

 

OF

 

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER

 

Theundersigned hereby certify that the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,2004 filed by TNS, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the issuer.

 
| Dated: May 17, 2004                     |
|-----------------------------------------|
|                                    |
| /s/    John J. McDonnell, Jr. |   |
|                                    | John J. McDonnell, Jr. |
|                                    | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                    |   |   |
|                                    |   |   |
| Dated: May 17, 2004                     |
|                                    |
| /s/    Henry H. Graham, Jr.   |   |
|                                    | Henry H. Graham, Jr. |
|                                    | Chief Financial Officer |
|                                         |  |  |  |  |

 

----
November 25, 1996
Smith Barney Institutional Cash Management Funds, Inc.
388 Greenwich Street
New York, New York 10013

                   Re:  Rule 24f-2 Notice
                              
Gentlemen:

    In connection with the filing by Smith Barney
Institutional Cash Management Funds, Inc., a Maryland
corporation (the "Fund"), of a Notice (the "Notice"),
pursuant to Rule 24f-2 under the Investment Company Act of
1940, as amended (the "Act"), for the Fund's fiscal year
ended May 31, 1996, the undersigned hereby provides the
legal opinion required by that Rule.

     In accordance with Rule 24f-2, the Fund has registered
an indefinite number of shares of common stock, $.00001 par
value, under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"1933 Act"). The purpose of the Notice is to make definite
the registration of  2,286,363,214 shares of the Fund (the
"Shares") sold in reliance upon the Rule during the fiscal
year ended May 31, 1996.

     The undersigned is Associate General Counsel of Smith
Barney Mutual Funds Management Inc., the Fund's
administrator, and in such capacity, from time to time and
for certain purposes, acts as counsel to the Fund. He has
examined copies of the Fund's Articles of Incorporation, its
By-Laws, resolutions adopted by its Board of Directors, and
such other records and documents as have been deemed
necessary for purposes of this opinion.  Furthermore, he has
examined a Certificate of the Controller of the Fund to the
effect that the Fund received the cash consideration for
each of the Shares in accordance with the aforementioned
organizational documents and resolutions.

     On the basis of the foregoing, and assuming all of the
Shares were sold in accordance with the terms of the Fund's
Prospectus in effect at the time of sale, he is of the
opinion that the Shares have been duly authorized and
validly issued and are fully paid and non-assessable.  This
opinion is for the limited purposes expressed above and
should not be deemed to be an expression of opinion as to
compliance with the 1933 Act, the 1940 Act or applicable
State "blue sky" laws in connection with the sales of the
Shares.


                                        Very truly yours,


                                        Robert Vegliante
                                        Associate General
                                        Counsel
                                        of Smith Barney
Mutual Funds
Management Inc.