alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 07/22/14          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      414,392
COMMITMENTS
 142,645  186,656  102,056  146,075   97,154  390,776  385,866   23,616   28,526

CHANGES FROM 07/15/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -20,609)
   2,485   -3,909      130  -19,650  -17,615  -17,035  -21,394   -3,574      785

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    34.4     45.0     24.6     35.3     23.4     94.3     93.1      5.7      6.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      204)
      68       79       83       40       34      157      159
```

----

Updated July 25, 2014
November 12, 1996





Smith Barney Muni Funds,
  388 Greenwich Street,
    New York, New York 10013.

Dear Sirs:
		In connection with the registration under the Securities Act of 
1933 (the "Act") of an indefinite number of shares (the "Shares") of 
beneficial interest, par value $.001 per share, of Smith Barney Muni Funds, a 
Massachusetts business trust (the "Trust"), we, as your counsel, have examined 
such trust records, certificates and other documents, and such questions of 
law, as we have considered necessary or appropriate for the purposes of this 
opinion.
		Upon the basis of such examination, we advise you that, in our 
opinion, when the Shares are issued and sold in accordance with the Trust's 
Registration Statement on Form N-14 (File No. 33-12651) under the Act in 
connection with the acquisition by the Trust on behalf of the Florida 
Portfolio of all or substantially all of the assets, and the assumption of 
certain liabilities, of the Florida Limited Term Portfolio, another series of 
the Trust, and in accordance with the Declaration of Trust and By-Laws of the 
Trust, the Shares will be validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable by the 
Trust.
		Under Massachusetts law, shareholders of a Massachusetts business 
trust may, under certain circumstances, be held personally liable for the 
obligations of Smith Barney Muni Funds.  The Declaration of Trust provides, 
however, that if a shareholder, as such, of Smith Barney Muni Funds is made a 
party to any suit or proceeding to enforce any personal liability, Smith 
Barney Muni Funds shall indemnify and hold each such shareholder harmless from 
and against all claims and liabilities to which such shareholder may become 
subject by reason of his being or having been a shareholder.  Thus, the risk 
of a shareholder's incurring financial loss on account of shareholder's 
liability is limited to circumstances in which Smith Barney Muni Funds itself 
would be unable to meet its obligations.
		The foregoing opinion is limited to the laws of the Commonwealth 
of Massachusetts, and we are expressing no opinion as to the effect of the 
laws of any other jurisdiction.  With respect to all matters of Massachusetts 
law we have, with your approval, relied upon the opinion dated November 12, 
1996 of Goodwin, Procter & Hoar, and our opinion is subject to the same 
assumptions, qualifications and limitations with respect to such matters as 
are contained in such opinion of Goodwin, Procter & Hoar.  We believe you and 
we are justified in relying on such opinion for such matters.
		Also, we have relied as to certain matters on information obtained 
from public officials, officers of the Trust and other sources believed by us 
to be responsible.
		We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to 
the Trust's Registration Statement.  In giving such consent, we do not thereby 
admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under 
Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933.
								Very truly yours,



								
 

(..continued)



 

 

Smith Barney Muni Funds	-2-





NY12527\37156.1



NY12527\37156.1
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1053 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Disperse Red 177. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2013 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Disperse Red 177. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DISPERSE RED 177. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Disperse Red 177 (CAS 

No. 68133–69–7) (provided for in subheading 

3204.11.50) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2016 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1053 IH

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Nicholas SCHIANO, dba HotWireMedia.com, et al., Petitioners, v. Matt FRIEDMAN, et al.

No. 19-405

Supreme Court of the United States.

Nov. 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Robert L. JARRETT, Jr., Petitioner v. STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA

No. 19-542

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
UAET (02-2008)

Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint

Attach this form to the Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint event.

CASE AND DEADLINE INFORMATION

Civil Action No.:

Name of party requesting extension:

Is this the first application for extension of time in this case? Yes

No

If no, please indicate which application this represents: Second

Third

Other ___________

Date of Service of Summons:

Number of days requested: 30 days

15 days

Other _____ days

New Deadline Date: (Required)

ATTORNEY FILING APPLICATION INFORMATION

Full Name:

State Bar No.:

Firm Name:

Address:

Phone:

Fax:

Email:

A certificate of conference does not need to be filed with this unopposed application.

Case 2:23-cv-00397-JRG-RSP Document 21 Filed 09/25/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 292
Isabel Yero GRIMON, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6268

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Craig ELIAS, Petitioner v. Mark CAPOZZA, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Fayette, et al.

No. 19-6030

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 21, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Luis A. RAMOS GONZÁLEZ, et al., Petitioners, v. SCOTIABANK DE PUERTO RICO, et al.

No. 19-700

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico denied.
Thomas POTTS, Petitioner v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 19-5645

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1092 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 98
113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1092

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 26, 2013

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the air route traffic control center located in Nashua, 
New Hampshire, as the ``Patricia Clark Boston Air Route Traffic Control 
                               Center''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF PATRICIA CLARK BOSTON AIR ROUTE TRAFFIC 
              CONTROL CENTER.

    (a) In General.--The air route traffic control center located in 
Nashua, New Hampshire, and any successor air route traffic control 
center at that location, shall be known and designated as the 
``Patricia Clark Boston Air Route Traffic Control Center''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the air route traffic 
control center referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a 
reference to the ``Patricia Clark Boston Air Route Traffic Control 
Center''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 25, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                                        Calendar No. 98

113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1092

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the air route traffic control center located in Nashua, 
New Hampshire, as the ``Patricia Clark Boston Air Route Traffic Control 
                               Center''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 26, 2013

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar
```
# C_2017069EN.01000301.xml

| 4.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/3

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP, as implemented by Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/381, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine

(2017/C 69/03)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons who appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP (1), as implemented by Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/381 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 (3) concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine.

1

2

3

The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons that appear in the abovementioned Annexes should be included in the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2014/119/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine. The grounds for designations of those persons appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 208/2014, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the abovementioned list should be reconsidered, before 1 December 2017 to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 66, 6.3.2014, p. 26.

1

(2)  OJ L 58, 4.3.2017, p. 34.

2

(3)  OJ L 66, 6.3.2014, p. 1.

3

---
# Official Journal L 235/12 S

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 235 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4812 September 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 235

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4812 September 2005

---

| Contents | | II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Council |
| | * | Staff Regulations of the European Union Institute for Security Studies | 1 |
| | * | Staff Regulations of the European Union Satellite Centre | 28 |

Contents

II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory

page

Council

*

Staff Regulations of the European Union Institute for Security Studies

1

*

Staff Regulations of the European Union Satellite Centre

28

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018277EN.01001801.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 7.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 277/18 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.8966 — PGA Motors/Fiber/Bernard Participations)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 277/06)

1.

On 31 July 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018277EN.01001801-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | PGA Motors SAS (PGA Motors, France), belonging to the group Emil Frey, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Fiber SC (Fiber, France), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Bernard Participations (France). |

PGA Motors acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Bernard Participations.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for PGA Motors: retail distribution of motor vehicles and spare parts, and associated repair and maintenance services,

—   for Fiber: family holding of controlling interest in Bernard Participations,

—   for Bernard Participations: retail distribution of motor vehicles and spare parts, and associated repair and maintenance services.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.8966 — PGA Motors/Fiber/Bernard Participations

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018277EN.01001801-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---
# Official Journal C 304E/2011

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CE2011.304.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 304E |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5415 October 2011 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CE2011.304.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 304E

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5415 October 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2011/C 304E/01 | Position (EU) No 10/2011 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council granting an EU guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under loans and loan guarantees for projects outside the Union and repealing Decision No 633/2009/ECAdopted by the Council on 20 September 2011 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COUNCIL

2011/C 304E/01

Position (EU) No 10/2011 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council granting an EU guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under loans and loan guarantees for projects outside the Union and repealing Decision No 633/2009/ECAdopted by the Council on 20 September 2011

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 132 

To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health 

Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2013 

Mr. KING of Iowa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees 

on Ways and Means, Education and the Workforce, the Judiciary, Natural Resources, House Administration, Rules, and Appropriations, for a 

period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act 

of 2010. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘ObamaCare Repeal 

5 Act’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HR 132 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AF2 FORDABLE CARE ACT AND THE HEALTH 

3 CARE AND EDUCATION RECONCILIATION ACT 

4 OF 2010. 

5 (a) PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE

6 ACT.—Effective as of the enactment of the Patient Pro7 tection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111–148), 

8 such Act is repealed, and the provisions of law amended 

9 or repealed by such Act are restored or revived as if such 

10 Act had not been enacted. 

11 (b) HEALTH CARE AND EDUCATION RECONCILI12 ATION ACT OF 2010.—Effective as of the enactment of 

13 the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 

14 (Public Law 111–152), such Act is repealed, and the pro15 visions of law amended or repealed by such Act are re16 stored or revived as if such Act had not been enacted. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with
Independent Auditors' Consent



To the Shareholders and Trustees of  Smith Barney Investment Trust:

We consent to the use of our report dated January 17, 1996 incorporated 
herein by reference and to the references to our Firm under the headings 
"Financial Highlights" in the Prospectuses and "Counsel and Auditors" in the 
Statement of Additional Information.




	KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


New York, New York
March 22, 1996
Amro A. ELANSARI, Petitioner v. UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA

No. 19-6443

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Scott PETERS, Petitioner, v. YOUNG SUN KIM

No. 19-5940

Supreme Court of the United States.

Nov. 18, 2019

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Jay Allen NEWCOMB, Petitioner, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 19-7927.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
SMITH BARNEY ALLOCATION SERIES INC.
on behalf of
SELECT INCOME PORTFOLIO AND SELECT CONSERVATIVE PORTFOLIO

Supplement dated March 8, 2001 to
Prospectus dated May 30, 2000


On February 12, 2001, the Board of Directors of Smith Barney
Allocation Series Inc. (formerly known as Smith Barney Concert
Allocation Series Inc.), on behalf of its Select Income Portfolio
and its Select Conservative Portfolio ("Income Portfolio" and
"Conservative Portfolio," respectively), approved a proposed
reorganization pursuant to which its Smith Barney Allocation
Select Balanced Portfolio ("Balanced Portfolio") would acquire
the assets and assume the stated liabilities of the Income
Portfolio and the Conservative Portfolio in exchange for shares
of the Balanced Portfolio.  The reorganization will allow Income
Portfolio and Conservative Portfolio shareholders to maintain an
investment in a fund with similar investment objectives and
investment policies.

Under the terms of the proposed reorganization, Income Portfolio
and Conservative Portfolio shareholders would receive shares of
the Balanced Portfolio equal in value to their investments in the
Income Portfolio and Conservative Portfolio in accordance with
the terms of the reorganization.  Income Portfolio and
Conservative Portfolio shareholders would not be charged a sales
load when Balanced Portfolio shares are issued to them and it is
anticipated that no gain or loss for Federal income tax purposes
would be recognized by shareholders as a result of the
reorganization.

The proposed reorganization is subject to the fulfillment of
certain conditions, including approval by the shareholders of the
Income Portfolio and the Conservative Portfolio.  Proxy materials
describing the proposed reorganization will be mailed to Income
Portfolio and Conservative Portfolio shareholders of record on
February 14, 2001, on or about March 26, 2001, in anticipation of
a meeting of the shareholders expected to be held on April 18,
2001.  If approved by Income Portfolio and Conservative Portfolio
shareholders at that time, the reorganization will occur as soon
after the shareholder meeting as practicable.


FD ______
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Edgar Lee Starr, Appellant

No. 06

- 19

- 00140

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 188th District Court of Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 48,108

- A ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Jus tice Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment
of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment and the bill of costs by changi ng the assessment of attorney fees from $425.00 to $0.00. As modified, the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed. We note that the appellant, Edgar Lee Starr, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED FEBRUARY 5, 2020 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk