alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- 1 - 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC § 

 § CASE NO. 2:24-cv-00052-JRG-RSP 

v. § (Lead Case) 

 § 

JACK IN THE BOX INC. §

 

ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC § 

 § 

v. § CASE NO. 2:24-cv-00054-JRG-RSP 

 § (Member Case) 

DICKEY’S BARBECUE RESTAURANTS, § 

INC. § 

 

ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC § 

 § CASE NO. 2:24-cv-00056-JRG-RSP 

v. § (Member Case) 

 § 

ZAXBY’S FRANCHISING LLC §

ORDER 

The above-captioned cases are hereby ORDERED to be CONSOLIDATED for all 

pretrial issues with the LEAD CASE, Case No. 2:24-cv-00052. All parties are instructed to file 

any future filings in the LEAD CASE. Individual cases remain active for trial. 

The Clerk is instructed to add the consolidated Defendants into the Lead Case and their 

corresponding Lead and Local Counsel only. Additional counsel may file a Notice of Appearance 

in the Lead Case if they wish to continue as counsel of record in the lead consolidated action. 

Counsel who has appeared pro hac vice in any member case may file a Notice of Appearance in 

the Lead Case without filing an additional application to appear pro hac vice in the Lead Case. 

Counsel who have not appeared in a member case at the point when it is consolidated into the Lead 

Case should file a Notice of Appearance only in the Lead Case, and such Notice should state the 

relevant member case. 

Case 2:24-cv-00054-JRG-RSP Document 13 Filed 04/18/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 68
- 2 - 

____________________________________

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 17th day of April, 2024.

Case 2:24-cv-00054-JRG-RSP Document 13 Filed 04/18/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 69
Adam C. VANCE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8364.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 26, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 117 (Friday, June 17, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 36460]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13065]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-04-2022]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 177--Evansville, Indiana; Authorization 
of Production Activity; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP (Pharmaceutical 
Products); Mount Vernon, Indiana

    On February 14, 2022, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP submitted a 
notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its 
facility within FTZ Subzone 177A, in Mount Vernon, Indiana.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (87 FR 10332-10333, February 24, 
2022). On June 14, 2022, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's 
decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this 
time. The production activity described in the notification was 
authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, 
including Section 400.14.

    Dated: June 14, 2022.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-13065 Filed 6-16-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350,**

**CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) (the “Act”), the undersigned, Robert J. Benkowski, Chief Executive Officer of MicroMed Cardiovascular, Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge: 

(1) the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSBfor the quarter ended March 31, 2007, (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company. 

Dated: May 15, 2007
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018451EN.01002001.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 14.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 451/20 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9202 — Bain Capital/Oscar Holding)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 451/08)

1.

On 5 December 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018451EN.01002001-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Digital Auto Parts Holding (‘DAPH’, France), controlled by Bain Capital Investors, L.L.C. (‘Bain Capital’, USA), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Oscar Holding SAS (‘Oscaro’, France). |

DAPH acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of Oscaro.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for DAPH: wholesale distribution of spare parts and accessories for light vehicles and heavy goods vehicles to the independent aftermarket,

—   for Oscaro: online retail distribution of spare parts and accessories for light vehicles mainly in France, and marginally in Spain, Belgium and Portugal.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018451EN.01002001-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9202 — Bain Capital/Oscar Holding

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018451EN.01002001-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018451EN.01002001-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
----

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 30 November 2005 — Vanlangendonck v Commission

(Case T-361/03) (1)

(Officials - Open competition - Non-inclusion on the reserve list - Infringement of the competition notice - Equality of treatment)

(2006/C 36/64)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant(s): Philippe Vanlangendonck (Overijse, Belgium) (represented by: B. Laurent, lawyer)

Defendant(s): Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall, Agent)

Application for

Annulment of the decision of the selection board in competition COM/A/10/01 not to include the applicant on the reserve list of that competition and for damages

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

----

(1)OJ C 7, 10.1.2004.

----
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6061

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. MICHAEL GREENE, a/k/a Mike , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Frank D. Whitney , Chief District Judge. ( 3:09

- cr - 00039

- FDW

- 5 ; 3:15

- cv 00420

- FDW )

Submitted : June 21, 2018 Decided: July 20, 2018

Before KEENAN and THACKER , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Michael Greene, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Michael Greene seeks to a ppeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would f ind that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and concl ude that Greene has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability , deny Greene’s motion for appointment of counsel, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are a dequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Louise K. SAINE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5861

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1  Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Virgin Media Inc. and
Virgin Media Investment Holdings Limited (the Registrants) for the three
months ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Neil A. Berkett, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Registrants, and Jerry V. Elliott, as Chief Financial
Officer of the Registrants, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of his knowledge, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Registrants.   Date:
  May 6, 2009
  By:
  /s/ NEIL A.
  BERKETTName:
  Neil A.
  BerkettTitle:
  Chief Executive OfficerDate:
  May 6, 2009
  By:
  /s/ JERRY V.
  ELLIOTTName:
  Jerry V.
  ElliottTitle:
  Chief Financial Officer  A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrants and will be
retained by the Registrants and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.  This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrants for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Jose Luis MEZA-LOPEZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6899

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Roosevelt Leon COOPER, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5852

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of *Rehaif* v. *United States* , 588 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 2191, 204 L.Ed.2d 594 (2019).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

VALTRUS INNOVATIONS LTD.,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

SAP AMERICA, INC. AND SAP SE,

 Defendants.

Civil Action No. 2:24-cv-21

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

DEFENDANTS SAP AMERICA, INC. AND SAP SE’S 

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND REPLY BRIEF DEADLINE

Defendants SAP America, Inc. and SAP SE’s (collectively, “SAP”) respectively request 

that the Court extend the deadline to file its reply brief in support of its Motion for Intra-District 

Transfer Under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (the “Motion to Transfer”). (Dkt. No. 22). SAP’s current 

deadline to file its reply brief is June 7, 2024, and SAP moves for an extension on or before 

June 11, 2024, to allow it adequate time to respond to the arguments raised in Valtrus Innovation 

Ltd.’s (“Valtrus”) Opposition to the Motion to Transfer (Dkt. No. 41). Valtrus is unopposed to this 

Motion. 

Case 2:24-cv-00021-JRG Document 42 Filed 06/05/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1508
2

Dated: June 5, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Thomas M. Melsheimer

Thomas M. Melsheimer

State Bar No. 13922550

tmelsheimer@winston.com

M. Brett Johnson

State Bar No. 00790975

mbjohnson@winston.com

Michael A. Bittner

State Bar No. 24064905

mbittner@winston.com

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP

2121 N. Pearl St., 9th Floor 

Dallas, TX 75201 

Telephone: (214) 453-6500 

ATTORNEYS FOR 

SAP AMERICA, INC. and SAP SE

Case 2:24-cv-00021-JRG Document 42 Filed 06/05/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 1509
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was filed electronically in 

compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). Therefore, this document was served on all counsel who 

are deemed to have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A). Pursuant to Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 5(d) and Local Rule CV-5(d) and (e), all other counsel of record not deemed to have 

consented to electronic service were served with a true and correct copy of the foregoing by email.

/s/ Thomas M. Melsheimer

Thomas M. Melsheimer

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

Pursuant to Local Rule CV-7(h), the undersigned counsel certifies that on June 5, 2024, 

counsel for SAP conferred with counsel for Valtrus, and Valtrus does not oppose this Motion.

/s/ Thomas M. Melsheimer

Thomas M. Melsheimer

Case 2:24-cv-00021-JRG Document 42 Filed 06/05/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 1510
Ben BRANCH, et al., Petitioners, v. MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF LABOR RELATIONS, et al.

No. 19-51

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts denied.
(logo) BERKADIA ®

 

 

Annual Statement asto Compliance

For the Year EndedDecember 31, 2019 

** **

*Morgan StanleyCapital, I Trust,*

*Series 2017-HR2*

 

Pursuant to Section 3.01 (37) of the SubservicingAgreement governing the referenced transaction (the “Servicing Agreement”), Ihereby attest that:

 

i. A review of theactivities and performance of Berkadia as Subservicer during the period hasbeen made under my supervision.

 

ii. To the best ofmy knowledge, based on such review, Berkadia as Subservicer has fulfilled, inall material respects, its obligations under this Subservicing Agreementthroughout the period and no default by the Subservicer under the SubservicingAgreement has occurred and is continuing.

 

 

Berkadia,

 

 

/s/ Mark E McCool

Mark E. McCool

President

February 10, 2020

 

Inv. 255 Lib A.
|    |                                                                                   |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Viemed Healthcare, Inc.; and |
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
|   | /s/ Casey Hoyt |
|   | Casey HoytChief Executive Officer |
Norman D. COX, Jr., Petitioner, v. The MONEY SOURCE, INC.

No. 19-652

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division denied.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC.
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(CHAPTER 98, TITLE 15 U.S.C. SS. 7241)

I,
Gilbert M. Cassagne, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13(a)-15(f) and
15(d)-15(f)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



Date:
August 7, 2008

/s/GILBERT M. CASSAGNEGilbert M. Cassagne, Chief Executive Officer


---
Order entered October 15, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01107-CV

SASSIN & ASSOCIATES LAW FIRM, P.C., FAHEEM BADY SASSIN, E.E. "TREY" 

TAYLOR, III AND E.E. "TREY" TAYLOR & ASSOCIATES, PLLC, Appellants

V.

ARACELDA HERNANDEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AS NEXT FRIEND OF A.G. AND M.G., 

MINORS, AND ANTONIO GONZALEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF 

J.G. AND A.G., Appellees

On Appeal from the 417th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 417-01724-2015

ORDER

We GRANT appellants Sassin & Associates Law Firm, P.C. and Faheem Bady Sassin’s 

October 14, 2015 unopposed motion for extension of time to file brief and ORDER the brief be 

filed no later than October 30, 2015.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
CITY OF FLINT, MICHIGAN, et al., Petitioners, v. Shari GUERTIN, et al.

No. 19-205

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 21, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 116 (Thursday, June 16, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 36359]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13008]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION


Federal Aviation Administration; Advanced Aviation Advisory 
Committee (AAAC); Renewal

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA announces the charter renewal of the Advanced Aviation 
Advisory Committee (AAAC), a Federal advisory committee that works with 
industry, community stakeholders, and the public to improve the 
development of the FAA's regulations.

DATES: This charter will take effect June 10, 2022, and will expire 
after two years unless it is renewed.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary Kolb, UAS Integration Office, 
Federal Aviation Administration, 490 L'Enfant Plaza SW, Suite 2206, 
Washington, DC, telephone (202) 267-4441; email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#490e283b30670226252b092f2828672e263f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0a4d6b787324416566684a6c6b6b246d657c">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 14(a)(2)(A) of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the FAA is giving 
notice of the charter renewal for the AAAC. The AAAC is a broad-based 
Federal advisory committee that provides the FAA with advice on key 
drone and advanced air mobility (AAM) integration issues by helping to 
identify challenges and prioritize improvements. The committee helps to 
create broad support for an overall integration strategy and vision. 
Membership comprises individuals who currently serve on an 
organization's core senior leadership team with the ability to make 
decisions on UAS or AAM-related matters. See the AAAC website for more 
information details on pending tasks at https://www.faa.gov/uas/programs_partnerships/advanced_aviation_advisory_committee/.

    Issued in Washington, DC.
Jessica A. Orquina,
Acting Manager, Executive Office, AUS-10, UAS Integration Office, 
Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2022-13008 Filed 6-15-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>