alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000919557
<NAME> SMITH BARNEY LARGE CAP VALUE PORTFOLIO
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER> 001
   <NAME> TRAVELERS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                      474,892,942
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                     522,830,991
<RECEIVABLES>                                  684,845
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                     466
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             523,516,302
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                     4,978,766
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                      339,293
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                          5,318,059
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                      0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                   443,563,826
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                       26,453,704
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                       27,423,892
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                   10,569,924
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                     16,126,444
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                    47,938,049
<NET-ASSETS>                               518,198,243
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                            5,322,106
<INTEREST-INCOME>                              203,427
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                               1,731,090
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                      3,794,443
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                     3,949,345
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                 (15,125,871)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                      (7,382,083)
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                            0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                        960,129
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                  1,930,317
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                                  0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                    (25,481,603)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                      6,775,481
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                   12,177,099
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                        1,674,876
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                              1,731,090
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                       517,761,093
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                            19.83
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                   0.15
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                         (0.39)
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                              0.00
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                         0.00
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                              0.00
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                              19.59
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                   0.67


</TABLE>
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### June 17, 2005 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT
MICHAEL R. FAGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 05-3125
v. (D.C. No. 04-CV-3114-GTV) (FNU) LINNEMAN, Mental Health Professional, Corrections Care Services, El Dorado Correctional Facility, in his official and private capacities; and ROGER WERHOLTZ, Secretary, Kansas Department of Corrections, in his official and private capacities, (D. Kansas)

Defendants-Appellees.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before EBEL , McKAY , and HENRY , Circuit Judges.
After examining Appellant’s brief and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would notmaterially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without ora l argument.-2-

This is a pro se civil rights appeal under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In hi s complaint, Mr. Fagan asserts that his civil rights were violated by Kansas Department of Corrections officials (Defendants). Mr. Fagan claims Defendants violated the Eighth Amendment guarantee against cru el and unusual punishment by depriving him of adequate medical care for his p reviously diagnosed bipolar disorder. The district court dismissed Mr. Fagan’s complaint because he failed to state a claim for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and entered judgment in Defendants’ favor. Mr. Fagan appeals to this court
. We agree with the district court that Mr. Fagan fai ls to state a cognizable Eighth Amendment claim. To pursue his § 1983 claimbased on such a constitutional violation, Mr. Fagan must show “deli berate indifference.” Estelle v. Gamble , 429 U.S. 97, 104 (1976). “Deliberate indifferenc e” occurs when an official “knows of and disregards an excessive riskto inmate health or safety.” Farmer v. Brennan , 511 U.S. 825, 837 (1994). Proof of “deliberate i ndifference” requires evidence that the pain or deprivation was sufficiently serious and that the offending official’s state of mind was sufficientlyculpable. Wilson v. Seiter , 501 U.S. 294, 298-99 (1991). Mr. Fagan failed to alleg e facts that meet this two-part test. Thus, Mr. Fagan’s § 1983 claim is not cogniz able. After a thorough review of Appellant’s brief and th e record, and for substantially the same reasons set forth in the dis trict court’s well-reasoned-3-

August 9, 2004, order and judgment of dismissal, we hold that Mr. Fagan failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The decision of the district court is AFFIRMED
. Entered for the Court Monroe G. McKay Circuit Judge
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 117 (Friday, June 17, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 36519]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13137]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Human Genome Research Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Human Genome Research Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel; New and Early Career Genomic Investigators.
    Date: July 22, 2022.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Human Genome Research Institute, National 
Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Suite 300, Bethesda, MD 
20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Rudy O. Pozzatti, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Human Genome Research 
Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, 
Suite 300, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-1580, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6c1c0316160d18181e2c010d050042020504420b031a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b6c6d9ccccd7c2c2c4f6dbd7dfda98d8dfde98d1d9c0">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human 
Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 14, 2022.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-13137 Filed 6-16-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
CERTIFICATE
                              
      The  undersigned, Controller of SMITH BARNEY
INSTITUTIONAL CASH MANAGEMENT FUNDS, INC. (the "Fund"),
hereby certifies that the Fund has received  full payment,
in accordance with the provisions of its Prospectus, for
3,898,956,144 shares of common stock,  par  value $0.01 per
share, the sales  of  which are reported in the Fund's Rule
24f-2 Notice covering the fiscal year ended
May 31, 1997 and that the facts otherwise stated in such
Notice are true.


                                   Irving P. David
                                   Controller

Dated:         July 11, 1997
Ledell TYLER, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6850

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Robert Allen STANFORD, Petitioner, v. Jay CLAYTON.

No. 19-6607

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
John Gregory Alexander HERRIN, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6188

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 12, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 2174

In re: KEVIN A. BAKER , Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus . ( 3:06

- cr - 00219

- REP

- 1 )

Submitted : January 4, 2022 Decided: January 10, 2022

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
Kevin A. Baker, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-2174 Doc: 9 Filed: 01/10/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Kevin A. Baker petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for a sentence reduction under Section 404 of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115

- 391, 132 Stat. 5194. He seeks an order from this cou rt directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the
district court has granted Baker’s motion. Accordingly, because the district court has recently dec ided Baker’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED USCA4 Appeal: 21-2174 Doc: 9 Filed: 01/10/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0001701 25-OCT-2016 08:01 AM
# C_2018418EN.01000302.xml

| 19.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 418/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 418/3

---

Special Report No 31/2018

‘Animal welfare in the EU: closing the gap between ambitious goals and practical implementation’

(2018/C 418/04)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 31/2018 ‘Animal welfare in the EU: closing the gap between ambitious goals and practical implementation’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://eca.europa.eu.

---
LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR SAINTS PETER AND PAUL HOME, Petitioner v. PENNSYLVANIA, et al.

No. 19-431

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 17, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit granted. The case is consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Demarkeithon Terrellious Ross, Appellant

No. 06

- 18

- 00174

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 188th District Court of Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 47070

- A ).
Memorandum Opinion del ivered by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Burgess and Justice
Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment

of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment by deleting the assessment of

attorney fees from the judgment. As modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

We note that the appellant, Demarkeithon Terrellious Ross, has adequately indicated his

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MAY 30, 2019
BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III
CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Luis D. Cabrera MEJIA, Petitioner, v. WALMART.

No. 19-5361

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Merisant Company (the “Company”)for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”), the undersigned, asChief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
|   | /s/ Paul  Block          |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | Paul Block               |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer |
|   | August 13,  2008    |

 

1

----
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1048 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Disperse Orange 73. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2013 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Disperse Orange 73. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DISPERSE ORANGE 73. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Disperse Orange 73 (CAS 

No. 40690–89–9) (provided for in subheading 

3204.11.50) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2016 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1048 IH

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Anthony Dale CARTER, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 19-6873

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 21, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District denied.
Taquan Rahshe GULLETT-EL, Petitioner, v. Timothy J. CORRIGAN, et al.

No. 18-9138

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 24, 2011

p0516 

# Order

May 24, 2011

142678

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142678 COA: 301373 Berrien CC: 2010-015004-FH PAUL WAYNE LESNIAK, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 10, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
## No. 04-15-00090-CR

IN THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS AT SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

ANTHONY ALEX DELEON

Defendant – Appellant vs. THE STATE OF TEXAS

Plaintiff – Appellee
On Appeal from the 25 District Court th of Guadalupe County, Texas Hon. Dan Beck Presiding Trial Court Cause No. 13-1992-CR-B

APPELLANT’S PRO SEMOTION FOR ACCESS TO APPELLATE RECORD

TO THE HONORABLE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS: Appellant Anthony Alex Deleon’s court-appointed attorney has filed Appellant’s Brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Appellant asks this court to provide him access to the appellate record so that he may review the record in drafting his pro se brief explaining what issues he thinks may be raised in this appeal. ACCEPTED 04-15-00090-CR FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/25/2015 11:43:40 AM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK2

WHE R E F OR E , P R E MI S E S C ON S I DE R E D, ap p e l l a n tAN T HO NY
A L E X D E L E O N p rays th ataft er rev i ew o f th i s m o t i o n an d an y resp o n se f i l e d by the S t a t e of

T e xa s , thi s c our tgr a ntthi s m ot i on a nd gr a ntM r . D e l e on
pro se a c c e s s to th e ap p e lla te r e c o r d in th is ap p e a l.
R e s pe c t f ul l y s ubm i tt e d,

A nthony A l e x D e l e on, A ppe l l a nt

T D C J # 1985117 G a r z aE a s t U n it 4304 H i ghw a y 202 B e e vi l l e , T e xa s 78102- 8981 C er ti fi cate of S er vi ce I h ereb y cert i fy th ata tru e co p y o f th i s d o cu m en tw as serv ed b y fi rst c l a s s U

. S

. m a i l upon the 25 J udi c i a l D i s tr i c tA tt orne y ’ s O f f i c e , 211 W

. th C ourtS tr e e t , S ui t e 260, S e gui n, T e xa s 78155 on , 2015.

C ert i fi ca t i on of C om pl i ance A c c o r d in g to th e W o r d P e r f e c t p r o g r a m u s e d to c r e a te th is d o c u m e n t, th e r e a r e 2 3 6 w o r d s in th is d o c u m e n t.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 25, 2011

y0418 

# Order

April 25, 2011

142285

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142285 COA: 300324 Hillsdale CC: 07-311333-FH LONNIE JOE MCLAVEY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 3, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
Clarence Duke REYNOLDS, Petitioner v. VIRGINIA, et al.

No. 19-6097

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1275 

To guarantee the right of individuals to receive Social Security benefits 

under title II of the Social Security Act in full with an accurate annual 

cost-of-living adjustment. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 20, 2013 

Mr. JONES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To guarantee the right of individuals to receive Social Security benefits under title II of the Social Security Act 

in full with an accurate annual cost-of-living adjustment. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Social Security Guar5 antee Act of 2013’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1275 IH

1 SEC. 2. GUARANTEE OF FULL SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS 

2 WITH ACCURATE ANNUAL COST-OF-LIVING 

3 ADJUSTMENT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—On a date not later than 90 days 

5 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 

6 of the Treasury shall issue a benefit guarantee certificate 

7 to each individual who is determined by the Commissioner 

8 of Social Security as of such date to be entitled to benefits 

9 under title II of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 401 

10 et seq.). The Secretary shall also issue such a certificate 

11 to any individual on the date such individual is determined 

12 thereafter to be entitled to benefits under such title. 

13 (b) BENEFIT GUARANTEE CERTIFICATE.—The ben14 efit guarantee certificate issued pursuant to subsection (a) 

15 shall represent a legally enforceable guarantee— 

16 (1) of the monthly amount of benefits to which 

17 the individual is entitled under title II of the Social 

18 Security Act (as in effect on the date of the issuance 

19 of the certificate); and 

20 (2) that the benefits will be adjusted— 

21 (A) not less frequently than annually on 

22 the basis of an accurate determination of the 

23 increase in the cost-of-living of the individual; 

24 and 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1275 IH

1 (B) in accordance with such title (as so in 

2 effect), to reflect any future changes in the eli3 gibility status of the individual under such title. 

4 (c) ENTITLEMENT.—Any certificate issued under the 

5 authority of this section constitutes budget authority in 

6 advance of appropriations Acts and represents the obliga7 tion of the Federal Government to provide for the payment 

8 to the individual to whom the certificate is issued benefits 

9 under title II of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 401 

10 et seq.) in the amounts set forth in the certificate and 

11 adjusted thereafter as described in subsection (b)(2). 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE, Petitioner, v. Micheal BACA, et al.

No. 19-518.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Jan. 17, 2020.

Motion of Thomas E. Weaver for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* in No. 19-518 granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Washington and to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit granted. The case is consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.