alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                       84,967,433
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                      89,590,414
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,141
<ASSETS-OTHER>                               3,463,810
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              93,058,365
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                       473,438
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                    3,907,832
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                          4,381,270
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                      0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                    80,185,235
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                        9,273,896
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                       14,054,462
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                    3,250,729
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                        618,150
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                     4,622,981
<NET-ASSETS>                                88,677,095
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                              165,374
<INTEREST-INCOME>                            4,037,050
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                                 931,659
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                      3,270,765
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                     8,507,982
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                      564,500
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                       12,343,247
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                  (4,135,024)
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                             42
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                  5,253,305
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                            472,327
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                    (32,050,326)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                      4,083,876
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                  (7,858,720)
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                          505,103
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                                931,659
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                       101,244,182
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                             8.73
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                   0.36
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                           0.78
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                              0.31
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                         0.00
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                              0.00
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                               9.56
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                   0.92



</TABLE>
**
Exhibit 34.2 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Ernst & Young LLP) 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors 

U.S. Bank National Association 

We have examined management’s****assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment ofCompliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that U.S. Bank National Association (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the U.S.Bank Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities****Platform (the “Platform”), for which the Company provides trustee, securities administration, registrar and paying agent services, as of and for the year ended March 31, 2019, exceptfor****servicing criteria Items 1122 (d)(1)(i)-(v), 1122 (d)(2)(i), 1122 (d)(2)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(v)-(vii), 1122 (d)(3)(i), and 1122 (d)(4)(i)-(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs withrespect to the servicing platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’scompliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination. 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established bythe American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with theapplicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise thePlatform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred eitherprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that the evidencewe obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. 

Our examination does not provide a legal determination on theCompany’s compliance with the servicing criteria. 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementionedservicing criteria as of and for the year ended March 31, 2019, for the U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Minneapolis,Minnesota 

May 22, 2019 

 
**
Hal Mark KREITMAN, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6797

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1105 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1105

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 9, 2013

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
                           and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 to provide a registration 
  exemption for private equity fund advisers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Capital Access and 
Job Preservation Act''.

SEC. 2. REGISTRATION AND REPORTING EXEMPTIONS RELATING TO PRIVATE 
              EQUITY FUNDS ADVISORS.

    Section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b-
3) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(o) Exemption of and Reporting Requirements by Private Equity 
Funds Advisors.--
            ``(1) In general.--Except as provided in this subsection, 
        no investment adviser shall be subject to the registration or 
        reporting requirements of this title with respect to the 
        provision of investment advice relating to a private equity 
        fund or funds, provided that each such fund has not borrowed 
        and does not have outstanding a principal amount in excess of 
        twice its invested capital commitments.
            ``(2) Maintenance of records and access by commission.--Not 
        later than 6 months after the date of enactment of this 
        subsection, the Commission shall issue final rules--
                    ``(A) to require investment advisers described in 
                paragraph (1) to maintain such records and provide to 
                the Commission such annual or other reports as the 
                Commission taking into account fund size, governance, 
                investment strategy, risk, and other factors, as the 
                Commission determines necessary and appropriate in the 
                public interest and for the protection of investors; 
                and
                    ``(B) to define the term `private equity fund' for 
                purposes of this subsection.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 4, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Adelbaset A. YOUSSEF, Petitioner v. Bill SCHUETTE, et al.

No. 19-6126

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Independent Auditors' Report


To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Smith Barney California Municipals Fund Inc.:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements
of the Smith Barney California Municipals Fund Inc. (the Fund)
for the year ended February 28, 2002, we considered its internal
control, including control activities for safeguarding
securities, in order to determine our auditing procedures for the
purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and
to comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide
assurance on the internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Those controls include the safeguarding of assets against
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, error or
fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any
evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to
the risk that it may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in the internal control that might be
material weaknesses under standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness
is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of
the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively
low level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in
amounts that would be material in relation to the financial
statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a
timely period by employees in the normal course of performing
their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters involving
the internal control and its operation, including controls for
safeguarding securities that we consider to be material
weaknesses as defined above as of February 28, 2002.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management, the Board of Directors of the Fund, and the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not intended to be and
should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.



New York, New York
April 15, 2002
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

VIRTAMOVE, CORP.,

Plaintiff,

v. 

HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE 

COMPANY,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-CV-00093-JRG

(LEAD CASE)

v. 

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS 

MACHINES CORP.,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-CV-00094-JRG

(MEMBER CASE)

ORDER

Before the Court is a Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant’s 

Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 35) filed by Plaintiff VirtaMove, Corp. (“VirtaMove”) and Defendant 

International Business Machines Corp. (“IBM”) and a Joint Motion for Extension of Time to 

Respond to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 36) (collectively, the “Motions”) filed by 

VirtaMove and Defendant Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (“HP”). In the Motions, the 

parties request that VirtaMove’s deadline to respond to IBM and HP’s motions to dismiss (Case 

No. 2:24-CV-00064-JRG, Dkt. 15, and Case No. 2:24-CV-00093-JRG, Dkt. 22) be extended up 

to and including May 13, 2024. The parties also request that Defendants’ deadline to reply be 

extended up to and including May 29, 2024. 

Having considered the Motions, and noting their joint nature, the Court finds that the 

Motions (Dkt. Nos. 35 and 36) should be and hereby are GRANTED. Accordingly, it is 

Case 2:24-cv-00093-JRG Document 37 Filed 04/29/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 166
2

ORDERED that VirtaMove’s deadline to respond to IBM and HP’s motions to dismiss is 

extended up to and including May 13, 2024. It is further ORDERED that the deadline for IBM 

and HP to file a reply brief in support of their motions to dismiss is extended up to and including 

May 29, 2024. 

.

____________________________________

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 29th day of April, 2024.

Case 2:24-cv-00093-JRG Document 37 Filed 04/29/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 167
Michael Tryance ANDERSON, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6758

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Physicians Formula Holdings, Inc.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Ingrid
Jackel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and




(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350
and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.




Date: May
5, 2008




By:
            /s/
      Ingrid JackelName:
            Ingrid
      JackelTitle:
            Chief
      Executive Officer







A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Physicians Formula
Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Physicians Formula
Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
CERTIFICATE
                              
      The  undersigned, Controller of SMITH BARNEY
MASSACHUSETTS MUNICIPALS FUND (the "Trust"), hereby
certifies that the Fund has received  full payment, in
accordance  with  the provisions of its Prospectus, for
711,754 shares of common stock,  par  value $0.001 per
share, the sales  of  which are reported in the Fund's Rule
24f-2 Notice covering the fiscal year ended  November 30,
1996 and that the facts otherwise stated in such Notice are
true.


                                   Thomas M. Reynolds
                                   Controller

Dated:         January 24,1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000895523
<NAME> MANAGED HIGH INCOME PORTFOLIO

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                      446,321,691
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                     429,286,946
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,237,568
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                     872
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             439,525,386
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                     2,811,371
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                    1,692,656
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                          4,504,027
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                      0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                   520,055,404
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                       43,432,103
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                       44,236,103
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                      229,710
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                   (69,293,985)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                  (15,969,770)
<NET-ASSETS>                               435,021,359
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                              476,063
<INTEREST-INCOME>                           48,680,670
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                               5,232,367
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                     43,924,366
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                  (37,972,107)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                    4,694,224
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                       10,646,483
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                   43,409,984
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                              0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                          0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                                  0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                    (39,610,052)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                      (755,015)
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                 (30,851,535)
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                        5,066,527
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                              5,399,839
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                       456,633,000
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                            10.73
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                   1.00
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                         (0.73)
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                              0.98
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                         0.00
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                              0.00
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                              10.02
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                   1.15


</TABLE>
Marcus JACKSON, Petitioner v. Noah NAGY, Warden

No. 19-6210

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
IN RE Levar Lee SPENCE, Petitioner

No. 19-5587

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
Jonathan Thomas WRIGHT, Petitioner v. Adam HOLLEY, Acting Commissioner of the West Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles

No. 19-5253

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 16, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the quarterly report of STAT Software, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Richard B. Vincent, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Richard B. Vincent

Richard B. Vincent

Chief Executive Officer

May 24, 2004
----

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 226/2004 of 10 February 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No 2505/96 opening and providing for the administration of autonomous Community tariff quotas for certain agricultural and industrial products

(Official Journal of the European Union L 39 of 11 February 2004)

On Page 5 in Annex I, third column, ‘TARIC code’ opposite Order No 09.2945 relating to ‘D-Xylose’:

for:

               ‘               10               ’,

read:

               ‘               20               ’.

----
Exhibit 35.1 

Servicer Compliance Statement of Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation 

**NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

The undersigned, Kevin J. Cullum, President and Chief Executive Officer of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the“Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such corporate officer, as follows: 

(1) The undersigned has caused a reviewof the activities of the Company, in its capacity as Servicer, during the period December 13, 2017 through March 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as ofDecember 13, 2017 (the “Agreement”), by and among the Company, individually and as servicer, Nissan Auto Receivables Corporation II, as seller, and Nissan Auto Receivables 2017-C Owner Trust, tobe conducted under his supervision; and 

(2) To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

This Officer’sCertificate is being furnished pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for publicly-issued asset-backed securities. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to suchterms in the Agreement. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the26th day of June, 2018.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Merisant Company (the “Company”)for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”), the undersigned, asVice President Finance, Controller of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ Julie  Wool                      |
|--------|--------------------------------------|
|   | Julie Wool                           |
|   | Vice  President, Finance, Controller |
|   | (Principal  Financial Officer)       |
|   | August 13,  2008                |

 

1

----