alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 13, 2011 | By:    | /s/ David H. Goebel, Jr.                                                                     |
|--------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|               |   | David H. Goebel, Jr.                                                                         |
|               |   | Interim Principal Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer(principal executive officer) |

----
Jenn-Ching LUO, Petitioner, v. LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC, et al.

No. 19-666

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 21, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office denied.

Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
# C_2018464EN.01000101.xml

| 27.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 464/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 464/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9151 — IFM/Trafigura/Simba Holdings)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 464/01)

On 27 November 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9151. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9151. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 0 9

- 1 0 7 5 1 C o n f e r e n c e C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v
. L A U R E N G A R Z A , D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e N o r t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o
. 5 : 0 7

- C R

- 6 8

- 2

B e f o r e J O L L Y , S T E W A R T , a n d O W E N , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : *
T h e F e d e r a l P u b l i c D e f e n d e r a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t L a u r e n G a r z a h a s

m o v e d f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f i l e d a b r i e f i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h A n d e r s v
. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. G a r z a h a s n o t f i l e d a r e s p o n s e
. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e r e c o r d a n d c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f d i s c l o s e s n o n o n f r i v o l o u s i s s u e f o r a p p e a l

. A c c o r d i n g l y , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June 22 , 20 10 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 09-10751 Document: 00511149833 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010
**Exhibit 13.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Bilibili Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Xin Fan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)               The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)               The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:   March 29, 2019 |                    |   |
|-----------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                        |                    |   |
| By:                         | /s/ Xin Fan        |   |   |
| Name:                       | Xin Fan                 |   |   |
| Title:                      | Chief Financial Officer |   |   |

 

----
Wesley G. COPELAND, Sr., Petitioner, v. KANSAS.

No. 19-5833

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Kansas denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Merisant Company (the “Company”) forthe period ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”),the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        | /s/ Paul Block          |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Paul Block              |   |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   | May 15, 2007            |   |
|        |                         |        |  |

 

----
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ FINJAN INC., a Delaware c orporation , Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

SYMANTEC CORP., a Delaware c orporation , WEBSENSE INC., a Delaware c orporation , AND

SOPHOS INC., a Massachusetts corporation , Defendants

- Appellees.

______________________

2013

- 1682

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Dis trict of Delaware in No. 1:10

- CV

- 00593

- GMS , Chief Judge Gregory M. Sleet.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________
P AUL J. A NDRE , Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, of Menlo Park, California, argued for plaintiff

appellant. With him on the brief were L ISA K OBIALKA and J AMES H ANNAH ; and A ARON M. F RANKEL of New York, New York. Of counsel on the brief was J EFFREY M. H ARRIS , Bancroft PLLC, of Washington, D C.D AVID A. N ELSON , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sull ivan, LLP, of San Francisco, California, and S EAN C. C UNNINGHAM , DLA Piper LLP, of San Diego, California, argued for defendant s- appellee s . On the brief for Syma ntec Corp. were J ENNIFER A. K ASH , S EAN S. P AK and D AVID A. N ELSON , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, of San Francisco, California . On the brief for Websense, Inc. were A NTHONY M. S TIEGLER and L ORI R. M ASON , of Cooley LLP, of San Diego, California. Of then brief for Sophos Inc. were J OHN A LL COCK , S EAN C. C UNNINGHAM , S TANLEY J. P ANIKOWSKI , and K ATHRYN R ILEY G RASSO , DLA Piper LLP, of San Diego, California

.

______________________
T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (P ROST , Chief Judge, N EWMAN and R EYNA , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

September 15, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Clerk
**Important legal notice**

*|*

# 12004V406

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE VI — THE FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - CHAPTER II — FINANCIAL PROVISIONS - Section 2 — The Union's annual budget - Article III-406***Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0176 - 0176*

Article III-406

In accordance with the conditions laid down by the European law referred to in Article III-412, any appropriations, other than those relating to staff expenditure, that are unexpended at the end of the financial year may be carried forward to the next financial year only.

Appropriations shall be classified under different chapters grouping items of expenditure according to their nature or purpose and subdivided in accordance with the European law referred to in Article III-412.

The expenditure of:

- the European Parliament,

- the European Council and the Council,

- the Commission, and

- the Court of Justice of the European Union

shall be set out in separate sections of the budget, without prejudice to special arrangements for certain common items of expenditure.

--------------------------------------------------
Michael RICHARDS, Petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 19-162

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office denied.
EXHIBIT
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. §1350





(SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





I,
      Raymond Li, Chief Financial Officer (principal executive officer) of
      China-Biotics, Inc. (the "Registrant"), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based
      upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September
      30,
      2008 of the Registrant (the “Report”):





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of The
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


*/s/
                Raymond Li*Raymond
                LiChief
                Financial OfficerNovember
                10, 2008
Christopher THORNTON, Petitioner v. Patricia Anne COYNE-FAGUE, Acting Director, Rhode Island Department of Corrections

No. 19-6666

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
# C_2018135EN.01000101.xml

| 17.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 135/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 135/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8853 — AXA/CDC/Cible dans Toulon Grand Var)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 135/01)

On 10 April 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8853. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8853. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
IN RE WEI ZHOU, Petitioner.

No. 19-6564

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for a writ of mandamus dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petition in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin* v. *District of Columbia Court of Appeals* , 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (*per curiam* ).
EXHIBIT 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BCTC V Assignor Corp. (the "registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer of registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|                |  |                            
|--------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:           |  |                            
|August 14, 2006 |  | /s/ John P. Manning        
|                |  |                            
|                |  | John P. Manning            
|                |  | Principal Executive Officer
|                |  |                            
|                |  |                            



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN RE William Henry HAMMAN, Petitioner

No. 19-421

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 21, 2019

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Aivaras MARDOSAS, Petitioner v. FLORIDA.

No. 19-513

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1056 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1056

     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Acid Black 132.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2013

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Acid Black 132.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACID BLACK 132.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.03.59 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Acid Black 132) is amended 
by striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/
31/2016''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
(logo)Rialto

CAPITAL

 

 

**2018 Annual Statement of ServicerCompliance (Item 1123)**

** **

 

Poolingand Servicing Agreement (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement") datedas of March 1, 2018 by and among GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, asDepositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, RialtoCapital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC asOperating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer, Wells Fargo Bank,National Association as Certificate Administrator, Wilmington Trust, NationalAssociation as Trustee relating to the GS Mortgage Securities Trust 2018-GS9,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2018-GS9 **(GSMS2018-GS9)**

 

Theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, asspecial servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1.       All servicing activities and performanceof such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement areperformed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

2.       A review of the servicing activities andperformance by the Special Servicer for the period of March 29, 2018 toDecember 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with the Pooling andServicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.

 

3.       To the best of my knowledge, based on suchreview, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theterms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for theReporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any suchobligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and statusthereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

Certifiedby: /s/ Adam Singer

AdamSinger, Managing Director 

 

Date:March 1, 2019
T.R. C., Petitioner v. WISCONSIN

No. 19-436

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District I denied.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.7  


 
 

FIRST AMENDMENT to SUBLEASE AGREEMENT
  DATED JANUARY 10, 2002    
    


[Canopy Properties, Inc./ Caldera International, Inc.]  


        This
FIRST ADMENDMENT is entered into as of the Fifteenth (15th) day of September 2003 between Canopy Properties, Inc. ("Tenant") and Caldera International, Inc.
("Subtenant"). 


        Whereas
Tenant and Subtenant entered into a Sublease dated January 10, 2002, Tenant and Subtenant hereby agree to amend the Sublease as follows: 


        1.     The
name of the Subtenant is hereby changed to The SCO Group. 


        2.     Effective
September 15, 2003, Tenant and Subtenant agree that Tenant shall sublease the Premises for which Subtenant was to become responsible effective
March 1, 2004, to a third party subtenant for a period of twelve months, renewable up to twenty-nine months, which would be the equivalent time period of Subtenant's
Sublease through Month forty-eight of Subtenant's Sublease. 


        Subtenant
acknowledges that Tenant has entered into said third party subtenant agreement at a market rate which is below Subtenant's obligated rate for the same time period, and that
Subtenant will be
responsible for the difference between it's rate and that of the new subtenant for the part of the third party space that Subtenant is responsible for. 


        The
amounts of the rent reduction to Subtenant may vary during this time period based on the amount of space the third party tenant occupies, and the renewal rates negotiated at the
times of renewal. The initial difference in rent owed Tenant by Subtenant will be $18,750 annually from March 1, 2004 through September 30, 2004, on 5,000 rentable square feet, reducing
Subtenant's obligations for this period from $708,756 annually to $626,255. 


        3.     Provided
that Subtenant elects to allow this third party subtenant to further renew it's sublease on March 1, 2006, again acknowledging that the third party
subtenant will likely renew at a rate below Subtenant's obligation, even though that renewal will be at market rates, since Subtenant will at that time be paying off deferred rent in it's overall
lease-payment schedule, therefore Subtenant will continue to be responsible for the difference in the two rates, the amount of which will be at least $29,112 annually from March 2006 through
February 2007, on 6,065 rentable square feet, should the third party renewal be at their same rate for the now committed space. If the third party renewal rate is higher, or if the third party
subtenant should sublease a larger part of the Additional Premises, the above obligation would be reduced accordingly. 


        All
other terms, conditions and provisions of said Lease shall remain in full force and effect. 



	LANDLORD:	 	TENANT:
	Canopy Properties, Inc.	 	The SCO Group
	

By:	
 	

/s/  BOYD WORTHINGTON      
	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/  WALTER HAMMOND      

	

Its:	
 	

VP, Real Estate Development	
 	

Its:	
 	

Director, Operations











QuickLinks


FIRST AMENDMENT to SUBLEASE AGREEMENT DATED JANUARY 10, 2002
Exhibit 4.2


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated July 23, 2019, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 1951 contained in Amendment No.
1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-230874) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned
report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


July 23, 2019
Keith A. TUCKER, et ux., Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

No. 19-41

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.