alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1110 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1110

     To amend the Tsunami Warning and Education Act to direct the 
 Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 
   through the National Weather Service, to establish, maintain, and 
   operate an additional tsunami forecast and warning center for the 
improvement of the evaluation of tsunami risk to, and the dissemination 
 of forecasts and tsunami warning bulletins for, the public in Puerto 
               Rico and the United States Virgin Islands.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 13, 2013

    Mr. Pierluisi (for himself, Mrs. Christensen, Mr. Serrano, Mr. 
 Faleomavaega, and Ms. Bordallo) introduced the following bill; which 
    was referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Tsunami Warning and Education Act to direct the 
 Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 
   through the National Weather Service, to establish, maintain, and 
   operate an additional tsunami forecast and warning center for the 
improvement of the evaluation of tsunami risk to, and the dissemination 
 of forecasts and tsunami warning bulletins for, the public in Puerto 
               Rico and the United States Virgin Islands.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tsunami Forecasting and Warning 
Improvement Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. IMPROVEMENT OF TSUNAMI FORECASTING AND WARNING PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 4(d)(1) of the Tsunami Warning and 
Education Act (33 U.S.C. 3203(d)(1)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B) by striking ``and'' after the 
        semicolon;
            (2) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph (D); 
        and
            (3) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following:
                    ``(C) a Caribbean Tsunami Warning Center in Puerto 
                Rico; and''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments in subsection (a) shall apply 
90 days after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018342EN.01000501.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 25.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 342/5 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9016 — CMA CGM/Container Finance)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 342/03)

1.

On 17 September 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 and following a referral pursuant to Article 4(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018342EN.01000501-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | CMA CGM SA (‘CMA CGM’, France), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Container Finance Ltd Oy (‘Container Finance’, Finland). |

CMA CGM acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Container Finance.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for CMA CGM: intra-European door-to-door multimodal transport services and, to a lesser extent, container terminal services and freight forwarding services,

—   for Container Finance: intra-European door-to-door multimodal transport services via its subsidiary Containerships, and, to a lesser extent, container terminal services.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9016 — CMA CGM/Container Finance

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018342EN.01000501-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---
Kendell Lee STARKS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5129

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# C_2018365EN.01000401.xml

| 9.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 365/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 365/4

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9117 — Saudi Aramco/Arlanxeo)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 365/06)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Aramco Overseas Holdings Coöperatief U.A. (the Netherlands) (‘AOHC’), a wholly owned subsidiary of Saudi Arabian Oil Company (the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia) (‘Saudi Aramco’), and |
| --- | --- |

—

Aramco Overseas Holdings Coöperatief U.A. (the Netherlands) (‘AOHC’), a wholly owned subsidiary of Saudi Arabian Oil Company (the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia) (‘Saudi Aramco’), and

| — | Arlanxeo Holding B.V. (the Netherlands) (‘Arlanxeo’). |
| --- | --- |

—

Arlanxeo Holding B.V. (the Netherlands) (‘Arlanxeo’).

Saudi Aramco, through its wholly owned subsidiary AOHC, acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Arlanxeo. Arlanxeo is currently jointly controlled by Saudi Aramco and Lanxess Deutschland GmbH.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | Saudi Aramco is engaged in the exploration, production and marketing of crude oil and in the product and marketing of refined products. |
| --- | --- |

—

Saudi Aramco is engaged in the exploration, production and marketing of crude oil and in the product and marketing of refined products.

| — | Arlanxeo is a specialty chemicals company that produces and offers a broad range of synthetic rubbers products. |
| --- | --- |

—

Arlanxeo is a specialty chemicals company that produces and offers a broad range of synthetic rubbers products.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9117 — Saudi Aramco/Arlanxeo

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| --- |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
Eugene J. SONNIER, II, petitioner, v. CATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF the DIOCESE OF LAFAYETTE, et al.

No. 19-339.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Jan. 21, 2020.

The petition for rehearing is denied.
Robert W. WAZNEY, Petitioner v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.

No. 19-6400

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Carolina denied.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14



I, George O. Deehan, Chief Executive Officer of the
registrant, certify that:



1. I have reviewed
this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sunset Financial Resources, Inc.;



2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge,
the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ George O. Deehan   
|George O. Deehan       
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|Date: November 14, 2005
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

KILOPASS TECHNOLOGY, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

SIDENSE CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

____________________ 

2013-1009

______________________

 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California in No. 10-CV-2066, Judge 

Susan Y. Illston. 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

MARK L. HOGGE, SNR Denton US, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the 

brief were SHAILENDRA K. MAHESHWARI, RACHEL REPKA, 

KHALIQ A. IMRAN and ANDREW BLAIR. Of counsel was 

JAMES A. KLENK. 

ROGER L. COOK, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, 

LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for defendantappellee. With him on the brief were ROBERT D. TADLOCK

and SARA B. GIARDINA. Of counsel was JOSHUA HAMILTON 

LEE, of Atlanta, Georgia. 

______________________ 
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, LOURIE, and 

O'MALLEY, Circuit Judges.). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 10, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

 Date Jan Horbaly

 Clerk
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018303EN.01002101.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 29.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/21 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9069 — Kuwait Investment Authority/North Sea Midstream Partners)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 303/09)

1.

On 23 August 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018303EN.01002101-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Kuwait Investment Authority (‘KIA’, Kuwait); |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | North Sea Midstream Partners Limited (‘NSMP’, UK). |

KIA acquires, within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation, sole control over the whole of NSMP via a special purpose vehicle, Selkie Investments Midstream Bidco Limited.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | KIA is a global investor, investing in real estate, private and public equity, fixed income and alternative investment markets across the globe; it principally acquires non-controlling minority stakes; |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | NSMP owns natural gas transportation and processing assets in and around the UK North Sea. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018303EN.01002101-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9069 — Kuwait Investment Authority/North Sea Midstream Partners

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018303EN.01002101-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018303EN.01002101-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Merisant Company (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31,2006 (the “Report”), the undersigned, as Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

(1) The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        | /s/ Anthony J. Nocchiero |
|--------|-------------------------------|
|   | Anthony J. Nocchiero          |
|   | Chief Financial Officer       |
|   | May 12, 2006             |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Merisant Company (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31,2006 (the “Report”), the undersigned, as Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

(1) The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.
|        | /s/ Paul Block     |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Paul Block              |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   | May 12, 2006       |

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

October 5, 2012

Order 

October 5, 2012

142936(54)

GALE BOERTMANN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 142936

v COA: 293835 

Macomb CC: 2008-003332-NF

CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellant.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by Michigan Association for Justice for 

leave to file a late brief amicus curiae is considered and it is granted.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000873637
<NAME> SB Int'l All Cap Growth Portfolio
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER>002
   <NAME>Smith Barney World Funds, Inc.

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  Oct-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                       Oct-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>              966,477,033
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>           1,495,759,114
<RECEIVABLES>                       62,732,801
<ASSETS-OTHER>                     213,172,916
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   1,771,664,831
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                     0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                      0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>          225,041,235
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                225,041,235
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                              0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>           791,900,704
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>               13,747,972
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>               13,180,221
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>             (438,362)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                       0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>            225,893,597
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                     0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>           529,267,657
<NET-ASSETS>                     1,546,623,596
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                    9,506,117
<INTEREST-INCOME>                    5,057,704
<OTHER-INCOME>                               0
<EXPENSES-NET>                      21,342,345
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>             (6,778,524)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>           231,801,774
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>          (78,543,209)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>              146,480,041
<EQUALIZATION>                               0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>            6,519,822
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>            24,531,095
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                        0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>              2,586,862
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>          2,211,891
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                    192,780
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>              78,796,931
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>              4,178,735
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>           94,970,580
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                      0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                   0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>               13,571,951
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                     21,342,345
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>               387,951,916
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                   26.880
<PER-SHARE-NII>                          0.000
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                  0.070
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                     0.490
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                1.860
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                     0.000
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                     24.490
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                           0.92



</TABLE>
Raymond GENTILE, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6378

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Christine SAWICKY, Petitioner, v. AMC NETWORKS INC.

No. 19-5206

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

The petition for rehearing is denied.
Patt MCGUIRE, Petitioner, v. ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MISSOURI, et al.

No. 19-6536

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Albert DIAZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-772

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 133420 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 133420 COA: 271652 Wayne CC: 03-008533-01 ERROL LASHONE HINTON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 31, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

d0618 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 26, 2007

Clerk
Leslie RUTLEDGE, Attorney General of Arkansas, Petitioner, v. PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION.

No. 18-540

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 10, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit granted.