alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit: 32.2CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Global Wide Publication Ltd.,(the
  "Company") on 10Q SB for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the
  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Rino
  Vultaggio, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
  18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: May 13, 2005.

| | /s/ “Rino Vultaggio”   
| | -----------------------
| | Rino Vultaggio         
| |                        
| | Chief Financial Officer
| | (Title)                

---
TENNESSEE, Petitioner, v. Tamarin LINDENBURG, Individually and as Natural Guardian of Her Minor Children ZTL and SML

No. 19-13

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# Official Journal C 153/10 J

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 153 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4710 June 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 153

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4710 June 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 153/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 153/1

Euro exchange rates

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

I Information

Commission

| 10.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 153/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 153/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

9 June 2004

(2004/C 153/01)

1 euro=

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2157 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,57 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4393 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,66460 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0925 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5197 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,12 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1830 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,58300 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,335 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 251,98 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4529 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6568 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4255 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6069 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 855 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,1400 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,955 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 804 336 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7442 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6391 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,4773 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9457 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0738 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 403,10 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,0714 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2157

JPY

Japanese yen

132,57

DKK

Danish krone

7,4393

GBP

Pound sterling

0,66460

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0925

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5197

ISK

Iceland króna

87,12

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1830

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,58300

CZK

Czech koruna

31,335

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

251,98

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4529

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6568

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4255

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6069

ROL

Romanian leu

40 855

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,1400

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,955

TRL

Turkish lira

1 804 336

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7442

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6391

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,4773

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9457

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0738

KRW

South Korean won

1 403,10

ZAR

South African rand

8,0714

---

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 Eastern District of Texas VIRTAMOVE, CORP. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP. 2:24-cv-00064-JRG VIRTAMOVE, CORP. 04/16/2024 /s/ Qi (Peter) Tong Qi (Peter) Tong, TX SBN 24119042

Russ August & Kabat 

4925 Greenville Ave., Suite 200 

Dallas, TX 75206

ptong@raklaw.com (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:24-cv-00064-JRG Document 21 Filed 04/16/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 138
Jose Anthony HEREDIA, Petitioner v. FLORIDA

No. 19-6728

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District denied.
Andrew Joseph LARSON, Petitioner, v. Michael PACHECO, Warden.

No. 19-5880

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

The petition for rehearing is denied.
Anton Jevon ALEXANDER, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5793

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6669

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JUDITH L. MILLER,

Defendant - Appellant,

and

GROUP TRIPS UNLIMITED, INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District

Judge. (CR-02-95, CA-03-504-A)

Submitted: July 10, 2003 Decided: July 16, 2003

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Collins Brennan, Jr., Upper Marlboro, Maryland; Frank

Salvato, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Jack I. Hanly, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Judith L. Miller seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on her motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that her

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322 (2003); Slack v.

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683

(4th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Miller has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Kelly DUTTON, Petitioner v. AMERICAN BANKERS INSURANCE COMPANY

No. 19-6369

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office denied.
Ricky Lee TYNDALL, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6707

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# C_2018391EN.01000201.xml

| 29.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 391/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 391/2

---

Special Report No 24/2018

‘Demonstrating carbon capture and storage and innovative renewables at commercial scale in the EU: intended progress not achieved in the past decade’

(2018/C 391/02)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 24/2018 ‘Demonstrating carbon capture and storage and innovative renewables at commercial scale in the EU: intended progress not achieved in the past decade’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://eca.europa.eu.

---
Independent Auditors' Report



To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees
of Smith Barney Muni Funds:

In planning and performing our audits of the financial statements of the New
York Money Market Portfolio and New York Portfolio of Smith Barney Muni Funds
(the "Funds") for the year ended March 31, 2001, we considered their internal
control, including control activities for safeguarding securities, in order to
determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on
the financial statements and to comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR,
not to provide assurance on internal control.

The management of the Funds are responsible for establishing and maintaining
internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments
by management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs
of controls.  Generally, controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the
entity's objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. Those controls include the
safeguarding of assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, error or fraud may occur
and not be detected.  Also, projection of any evaluation of internal control
to future periods is subject to the risk that it may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily disclose all
matters in internal control that might be material weaknesses under standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A
material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of one or
more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low
level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in amounts that
would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited may
occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal
course of performing their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters
involving internal control and its operation, including controls for
safeguarding securities, that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined
above as of March 31, 2001.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of management, the
Board of Trustees of the Funds, and the Securities and Exchange Commission and
is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these
specified parties.




New York, New York
May 8, 2001
James Byron COON, Petitioner v. Mark NOOTH, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution

No. 19-6352

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-21-00191-CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding

141st District Court of Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 141-316567-20

Before Wallach, Birdwell, and Womack, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

IN RE JMJ DEVELOPMENT, LLC AND TIM BARTON, Relators
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relators’ petition for writ of mandamus, real parties in 

interest’s response, relators’ reply, and the record and is of the opinion that relief 

should be denied. Accordingly, relators’ petition for writ of mandamus is denied. All 

previous orders of this court granting temporary relief in conjunction with this 

petition for mandamus are withdrawn.

Per Curiam

Delivered: July 15, 2021
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. §1350





(SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





I, Travis
Cai, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of China-Biotics,
Inc. (the “Registrant”), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based upon a
review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010
of the Registrant (the “Report”):





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




/s/ Travis CaiTravis
      CaiChief
      Financial OfficerAugust
      9, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 116 (Thursday, June 16, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 36320]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12994]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP22-976-000.
    Applicants: Gulfstream Natural Gas System, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing: Phase VI Expansion Project In-
Service Filing CP19-475-000 to be effective 7/15/2022.
    Filed Date: 6/10/22.
    Accession Number: 20220610-5032.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 6/22/22.

    Any person desiring to protest in any the above proceedings must 
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18 
CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified 
comment date. The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary 
system (https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by 
querying the docket number. eFiling is encouraged. More detailed 
information relating to filing requirements, interventions, protests, 
service, and qualifying facilities filings can be found at:http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: June 10, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-12994 Filed 6-15-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
VETERANS CONTRACTING GROUP, INC., Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-464

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
IV 

House Calendar No. 127 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 103 

[Report No. 113–549] 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District of Columbia 

Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 23, 2014 

Ms. NORTON submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

JULY 23, 2014 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District 

of Columbia Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 103 RH 

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF CAPITOL 

2 GROUNDS FOR D.C. SPECIAL OLYMPICS LAW 

3 ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN. 

4 On October 3, 2014, or on such other date as the 

5 Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Com6 mittee on Rules and Administration of the Senate may 

7 jointly designate, the 29th annual District of Columbia 

8 Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this 

9 resolution referred to as the ‘‘event’’) may be run through 

10 the Capitol Grounds to carry the Special Olympics torch 

11 to honor local Special Olympics athletes. 

12 SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD. 

13 The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as 

14 may be necessary to carry out the event. 

15 SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARA16 TIONS. 

17 The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions 

18 for physical preparations for the event. 

19 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

20 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce21 ment of the restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of 

22 title 40, United States Code, concerning sales, advertise23 ments, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, 

24 as well as other restrictions applicable to the Capitol 

25 Grounds, in connection with the event. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 127 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 103 

[Report No. 113–549] 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the 

forcement Torch Run. District of Columbia Special Olympics Law EnJULY 23, 2014 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
HIGH INCOME OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
10f-3 REPORT
November 1, 1998 through March 31, 1999



			Trade									% of
Issuer			Date		Selling Dealer		Amount
	Price		Issue

Harrah's Operating Inc.	12/4/98		Morgan Stanley		$4,080,000
	$100.000		3.07%
7.875% due 12/15/2005

HMH Properties		12/9/98		Donaldson, Lufkin & 	5,151,000
	99.664		6.00
8.450% due 12/10/2008			Jenrette

Hexcel Corp.		1/15/99		CS First Boston		2,385,000
	100.000		5.83
9.750% due 1/15/2009

Group Maintenance	1/19/99		Merrill Lynch		3,430,000	100.000
	15.38
9.750% due 1/15/2019

DR Horton		2/01/99		Donaldson, Lufkin & 	2,545,000	99.460
	3.90
8.000% due 2/01/2029			Jenrette

Dr. Horton		2/1/99		Donaldson, Lufkin &	2,545,000	99.457		3.90
8.000% due 2/1/2029			Jenrette

National Steel Corp.	3/3/99		J.P. Morgan		850,000		99.226
	2.22
9.875% due 3/1/2009

Charter Communications	3/12/99		Goldman Sachs
0/9.920% due 4/1/2011						5,448,717	61.394
8.625% due 4/1/2009						5,125,000	99.695
								10,573,717			2.08
James W. RILEY, Petitioner, v. Dana METZGER, Warden, et al.

No. 19-6846.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Jan. 13, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
IN RE Sherman Alexander LYNCH, Petitioner

No. 19-6441

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 16, 2019

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
----

(2004/C 88 E/0018)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1142/03

by Stavros Xarchakos (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(1 April 2003)

Subject:   Protection of archaeological museum exhibits in Iraq

According to the Greek press, the National Archaeological Museum of Iraq is regarded as one of the most important archaeological museums in the Middle East, the other being situated in Cairo. The National Archaeological Museum of Iraq was open for only two years following damage sustained during the ‘Desert Storm’ operation in 1991 and a few days ago it once more closed down following the threat of further attack. The museum contains exhibits from the prehistoric age and from Sumerian, Acadian, Babylonian, Assyrian, Chaldean and other civilisations.

When the destruction of cultural treasures in Afghanistan was being witnessed by the international community, I submitted a question to the Commission (P-0822/01) (1) asking what it thought of the idea of setting up a special EU fund for buying up cultural treasures threatened with destruction and whether funds were available to protect the world's cultural heritage. In reply I was informed that ‘the budget of the Community does not contain provision for the funding of measures destined to protect the world cultural heritage and that there are at present no plans by the Community to create a special fund to buy cultural treasures threatened with destruction’.

Given the probability of further destruction of treasures forming part of the world's cultural heritage, how does the Commission now view the idea of setting up such a fund? What measures will it take to protect the cultural treasures of the National Archaeological Museum of Iraq from destruction as a result of the war?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(6 May 2003)

The Commission expresses deep concern for the suffering provoked by the conflict to the Iraqi population. It is also concerned about physical damages to the infrastructures and buildings, including cultural treasures. After the pillage and the destruction of a large number of archaeological treasures in the Museums of Baghdad, Tikrit and Mossoul, the Commission hopes that all measures will be taken so that further destruction is avoided.

As already explained in the context of the conflict in Afghanistan, the EU has not foreseen the creation of a special fund for the preservation of cultural treasures from destruction in a third country. Possible intervention in this area could take place only in the framework of potential EU involvement in the reconstruction of Iraq, and in line with the priorities of intervention identified, following the assessment of needs and damages.

----

(1)OJ C 261 E, 18.9.2001, p. 202.

----