alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned, Clive Barwin, President, CEO and Secretary of Melt Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Melt Inc. for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Melt Inc.

 

Dated:  November 10, 2005

 

 

*/s/ Clive Barwin*

 

Clive Barwin

President, CEO and Secretary

(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Melt Inc. and will be retained by Melt Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
10.2


 


MODIFICATION TO PROMISSORY NOTE


 


WHEREAS, on July 3, 1995, Lee Pharmaceuticals
(“maker”) and Sass DiSalvo (“Holder”) entered into an agreement (“Note”)
whereby Lee Pharmaceuticals was to pay to Sass DiSalvo the sum of Fifty
Thousand Dollars; and


 


WHEREAS, on July 6, 1996, the parties thereto modified
said Note to extend the maturity date from July 6, 1996, until December 8,
1997, ( a copy of said Modification to Promissory Note is attached for
reference as Exhibit A); and


 


WHEREAS, on December 8, 1997, the parties thereto
modified said Note to extend the maturity date from December 8, 1997, until
December 1, 1998, (a copy of said Modification to Promissory Note is attached
for reference as Exhibit B); and


 


WHEREAS, on December 1, 1998, the parties thereto
modified said Note to extend the maturity date from December 1, 1998, until
June 30, 1999, (a copy of said Modification to Promissory Note is attached for
reference as Exhibit C); and


 


WHEREAS, on June 30, 1999, the parties thereto
modified said Note to extend the maturity date from June 30, 1999, until June
30, 2000, (a copy of said Modification to Promissory Note is attached for
reference as Exhibit D); and


 


WHEREAS, on June 30, 2000, the parties thereto
modified said Note to extend the maturity date from June 30, 2000, until
December 1, 2001, (a copy of said Modification to Promissory Note is attached
for reference as Exhibit E); and


 


WHEREAS, on December 1, 2001, the parties thereto
modified said Note to extend the maturity date from December 1, 2001, until
December 1, 2002, (a copy of said Modification to Promissory Note is attached
for reference as Exhibit F); and


 


WHEREAS, on December 1, 2002, the parties thereto
modified said Note to extend the maturity date from December 1, 2002, until December
1, 2003, (a copy of said Modification to Promissory Note is attached for
reference as Exhibit G; and


 


WHEREAS, the parties hereto now desire to further
modify said Note and Modification;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the parties modify said Note and
Modification as follows:


 


1.             The
maturity date of the Note is extended from December 1, 2003, until December 1,
2004.


 


2.             All
other terms and conditions of the Note remain the same.


 


 


Date this  24TH  day of NOVEMER, 2003


 

















 


	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  RONALD G. LEE

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Lee Pharmaceuticals

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:  Ronald
  G. Lee, President

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  SASS DI SALVO

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Sass DiSalvo
Marie GILLISPIE, Petitioner v. REGIONALCARE HOSPITAL PARTNERS, INC., et al.

No. 18-1299

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Certifications

I, Richard Simpson, certify that:


1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2018-B2 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);


2.	Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.	Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;


4.	Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and


5.	All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association; LNR Partners, LLC; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; U.S. Bank National Association; Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; Computershare Trust Company, National Association; CoreLogic Solutions, LLC; KeyBank National Association; Pentalpha Surveillance LLC; and Wilmington Trust, National Association.



Date:	March 30, 2023

/s/ Richard Simpson ___________________Richard SimpsonPresident, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)

CGCMT 2018-B2 Certifications

---
Charles R. HUNTER, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 19-429.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Nov. 12, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Yolanda M. WILLIAMS, Petitioner v. Lisa A. MILLARD, Judge, District Court of Texas, Harris County.

No. 19-5734

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Eastern District of Texas

FALL LINE PATENTS, LLC,

5:23-cv-114

DUNKIN BRANDS, INC. and DUNKIN' DONUTS 

LLC,

Dunkin Brands, Inc. 

c/o Corporation Service Company 

251 Little Falls Drive 

Wilmington, DE 19808

ANTONELLI, HARRINGTON & THOMPSON LLP 

4306 Yoakum Blvd., Ste. 450 

Houston, TX 77006 

(713) 581-3000 

10/13/2023

Case 5:23-cv-00114-RWS Document 3 Filed 10/13/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 17
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

5:23-cv-114 0.00 Print Save As... Reset

Case 5:23-cv-00114-RWS Document 3 Filed 10/13/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 18
Maurice Antoine-Hake DOBSON-EL, Petitioner v. MICHIGAN

No. 19-6350

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Michigan denied.
# C_2018095EN.01000101.xml

| 13.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8767 — CDPQ/Hyperion Insurance Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 95/01)

On 6 March 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8767. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8767. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6061

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL GREENE, a/k/a Mike,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (3:09-cr-00039-FDW-5; 3:15-cv00420-FDW)

Submitted: June 21, 2018 Decided: July 20, 2018

Before KEENAN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Greene, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Greene seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, 

a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that 

the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion 

states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Greene has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny Greene’s 

motion for appointment of counsel, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# CA2004133EN.01000101.xml

| 11.5.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 133/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 133/1

---

Image

---
United Technologies Corporation Long Term Incentive Plan, as amended


  
 Exhibit 10.6

  
 UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 
 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN 
  
 AMENDMENT 
  
 Whereas, the United Technologies Corporation Long Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) was adopted by the Corporation and approved by shareowners on April 24, 1989 and subsequently amended and approved
again by shareowners on April 25, 1995; and 
  
 Whereas, the New York Stock
Exchange has amended its listing standards relative to shareholder approval requirements of equity compensation arrangements to require, among other things, that the Plan have a ten-year term limit effective from the date of the most recent
shareholder approval; 
  
 Now therefore, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as
follows: 
  

	1.	Section 8 of the Plan is amended by adding the following sentence at the end thereof: 

  
 The Plan shall in no event continue beyond April 24, 2005 unless extended by a majority vote of the Corporation’s
shareowners. 
  

			
	UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
		
	 	 	 
	 	 	 William L. Bucknall, Jr.
 Sr. Vice President Human Resources
 and Organization


  

	
	Attest:
	
	  
	 Richard M. Kaplan

	
	 Date: January 28, 2004
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 107 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to limit the circumstances in which 

official time may be used by a Federal employee. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2013 

Mr. GINGREY of Georgia (for himself, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. 

JONES, Mr. ROSS, Mr. HUELSKAMP, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. ROKITA, Mr. 

PEARCE, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. ROE of Tennessee, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, 

Mr. CARTER, Mr. DUNCAN of Tennessee, and Mr. CHAFFETZ) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to limit the circumstances in which official time may be used by a 

Federal employee. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Employee Ac5 countability Act of 2013’’. 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HR 107 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS RELATING TO OF2 FICIAL TIME. 

3 Section 7131 of title 5, United States Code, is 

4 amended— 

5 (1) by striking subsections (a) and (c); 

6 (2) by redesignating subsections (b) and (d) as 

7 subsections (a) and (b), respectively; and 

8 (3) in subsection (b) (as so redesignated by 

9 paragraph (2)), by striking ‘‘Except as provided in 

10 the preceding subsections of this section—’’ and in11 serting ‘‘Except as provided in subsection (a)—’’. 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board

# DATES:

June 28, 2022 at 10 a.m.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Telephonic. Dial-in (listen only) information: Number: 1-202-599-1426, Code: 584 412 888#; or via web:                         *https://teams.microsoft.com/​l/​meetup-join/​19%3ameeting_​NzFkODU3NDgtZmVlZC00MTc4LWI3YTYtNGU4MDUxNjAwMGVh%40thread.v2/​0?​context=​%7b%22Tid%22%3a%223f6323b7-e3fd-4f35-b43d-1a7afae5910d%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%227c8d802c-5559-41ed-9868-8bfad5d44af9%22%7d.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kimberly Weaver, Director, Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Board Meeting Agenda

### Open Session

1. Approval of the May 24, 2022 Board Meeting Minutes

2. Converge Update

3. Monthly Reports

(a) Participant Activity Report

(b) Investment Report

(c) Legislative Report

4. Quarterly Report

(d) Vendor Risk Management Report

5. 2021 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS) Update

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(1).                

Dated: June 15, 2022.

Dharmesh Vashee,

General Counsel, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.

[FR Doc. 2022-13253 Filed 6-21-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 13

- 15379 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 3:13

- cr
- 00011

- MMH

- MCR

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus BENJAMIN CAINE,
Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ (July 2, 2014)
Before CARNES, Chief J udge , HULL and MARCUS , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Case: 13-15379 Date Filed: 07/02/2014 Page: 1 of 22 Tracy N. DaCruz, counsel for Benjamin Caine, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion is GRANT ED , and Caine’s
conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case: 13-15379 Date Filed: 07/02/2014 Page: 2 of 2
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000797480
<NAME> SMITH BARNEY SECTOR SERIES
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER>004
   <NAME>SMITH BARNEY TECHNOLOGY FUND

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              8 Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   OCT-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                        OCT-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>              215,509,075
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>             185,478,850
<RECEIVABLES>                        4,260,885
<ASSETS-OTHER>                               0
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                       837
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     189,740,572
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>               770,509
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                      0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                    0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                    770,509
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                              0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>           234,543,927
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                7,457,148
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                        0
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                    0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>              (2,200,142)
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>            (13,908,721)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                     0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>           (30,030,225)
<NET-ASSETS>                       188,404,839
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                       94,516
<INTEREST-INCOME>                      146,462
<OTHER-INCOME>                               0
<EXPENSES-NET>                       2,441,120
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>             (2,200,142)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>           (13,908,721)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>          (30,030,225)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>              (46,139,088)
<EQUALIZATION>                               0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                    0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                     0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                        0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>            258,490,217
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>        (23,946,290)
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                          0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>             188,404,839
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                      0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                    0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                      0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                   0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                1,106,818
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                      2,537,514
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                64,022,404
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                    11.40
<PER-SHARE-NII>                          (0.12)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                   0.00
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                      0.00
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                 0.00
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                      0.00
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                       9.09
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                           2.25
[AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING]                       0
[AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE]                         0



</TABLE>
Elseddig Elmarioud MUSA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the DISTRICT OF ARIZONA.

No. 18-9458

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
IN RE Charlene ROSA, Petitioner.

No. 19-7055

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 21, 2020

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Darren DENSON, Petitioner v. ILLINOIS.

No. 19-5800

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District denied.