alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018144EN.01001401.xml

| 25.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/14

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Establishment of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 144/05)

| Member State | United Kingdom |
| --- | --- |
| Routes concerned | Newquay to Heathrow Airport
  Newquay to Gatwick Airport
  Newquay to Stansted Airport
  Newquay to Luton Airport
  Newquay to London City Airport
  Newquay to Southend Airport |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 28 October 2018 |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the modified public service obligations can be obtained | Cornwall Council |
| New County Hall |
| Treyew Road |
| Truro, TR1 3AY |
| UNITED KINGDOM |
| For the attention of: Corporate Procurement Services |
| Email: awaterman-jones@cornwall.gov.uk |

Member State

United Kingdom

Routes concerned

Newquay to Heathrow Airport

Newquay to Gatwick Airport

Newquay to Stansted Airport

Newquay to Luton Airport

Newquay to London City Airport

Newquay to Southend Airport

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

28 October 2018

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the modified public service obligations can be obtained

Cornwall Council

New County Hall

Treyew Road

Truro, TR1 3AY

UNITED KINGDOM

For the attention of: Corporate Procurement Services

Email: awaterman-jones@cornwall.gov.uk

---
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350





(SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





I, Song
Jinan, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of China-Biotics,
Inc. (the “Registrant”), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based upon a
review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31,
2009 of the Registrant (the “Report”):





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of The
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




/s/
      Song JinanSong
      JinanChief
      Executive OfficerFebruary
      11, 2010
July 11, 1997
Smith Barney Institutional Cash Management Fund, Inc.
388 Greenwich Street
New York, N.Y. 10013

                   Re:  Rule 24f-2 Notice
                              
Gentlemen:

    In connection with the filing by Smith Barney
Institutional Cash Management Fund, Inc., a Maryland
Corporation (the "Fund"), of a Notice (the "Notice"),
pursuant to Rule 24f-2 under the Investment Company Act of
1940, as amended (the "Act"), for the Fund's fiscal year
ended      May 31, 1997, the undersigned hereby provides the
legal opinion required by that Rule.

     In accordance with Rule 24f-2, the Fund has registered
an indefinite number of shares of common stock, $0.01 par
value, under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"1933 Act"). The purpose of the Notice is to make definite
the registration of  3,898,956,144 shares of the Fund (the
"Shares") sold in reliance upon the Rule during the fiscal
year ended May 31, 1997.

     The undersigned is Associate General Counsel of Smith
Barney Mutual Funds Management Inc., the Fund's
administrator, and in such capacity, from time to time and
for certain purposes, acts as counsel to the Fund. He has
examined copies of the Fund's Articles of Incorporation, its
By-Laws, resolutions adopted by its Directors, and such
other records and documents as have been deemed necessary
for purposes of this opinion.  Furthermore, he has examined
a Certificate of the Controller of the Fund to the effect
that the Fund received the cash consideration for each of
the Shares in accordance with the aforementioned
organizational documents and resolutions.

     On the basis of the foregoing, and assuming all of the
Shares were sold in accordance with the terms of the Fund's
Prospectus in effect at the time of sale, he is of the
opinion that the Shares have been duly authorized and
validly issued and are fully paid and non-assessable.  This
opinion is for the limited purposes expressed above and
should not be deemed to be an expression of opinion as to
compliance with the 1933 Act, the 1940 Act or applicable
State "blue sky" laws in connection with the sales of the
Shares.


                                        Very truly yours,


                                        Robert Vegliante
                                        Associate General
                                        Counsel
                                        Smith Barney Mutual
Funds
Management Inc.
Roscoe JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. MISSISSIPPI.

No. 19-8294.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 26, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Mississippi denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11



                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                FOR THREE MONTHS ENDED               FOR NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                    SEPTEMBER 30,                       SEPTEMBER 30,
PRIMARY:                        1996              1995              1996              1995
                             -----------       -----------       -----------       -----------
<S>                          <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>
Net Income ...........       $ 7,051,929       $ 4,126,602       $18,690,603       $10,358,818
                             ===========       ===========       ===========       ===========

Weighted average
number of shares of
common stock
outstanding  .........        12,868,019        12,465,531        12,688,735        12,465,531

Net effect of dilutive
stock options -- based
on the treasury stock
method using average 
market price .........         1,250,115           474,229         1,050,980           240,073
                             -----------       -----------       -----------       -----------

Total weighted average
number of shares of
common stock and
common stock 
equivalents 
outstanding..........         14,118,134        12,939,760        13,739,715        12,705,604
                              ===========       ===========       ===========       ===========

Net income per common
 share ...............       $      0.50       $      0.32       $      1.36       $      0.82

<CAPTION>


FULLY DILUTED:                  1996              1995              1996              1995
                             -----------       -----------       -----------       -----------
<S>                          <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>
Net Income ...........       $ 7,051,929       $ 4,126,602       $18,690,603       $10,358,818
                             ===========       ===========       ===========       ===========
Weighted average
number of shares of
common stock 
outstanding  .........        12,868,019        12,465,531        12,688,735        12,465,531

Net effect of dilutive
stock options -- based
on the treasury stock
method using the
greater of the average
or quarter-end market  
price ................         1,250,115           474,229         1,295,757           240,073
                             -----------       -----------       -----------       -----------
Total weighted average
number of shares of
common stock and
common stock
equivalents 
outstanding ..........        14,118,134        12,939,760        13,984,492        12,705,604
                             ===========       ===========       ===========       ===========
Net income per common
 share ...............       $      0.50       $      0.32       $      1.34       $      0.82

</TABLE>
Jessie D. MCDONALD, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, et al.

No. 19-8

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: COPART, INC., COPART

OF HOUSTON, INC., AND

HOUSTON COPART SALVAGE

AUTO AUCTIONS, LP.

Relators

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 8

- 00 034

- CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

O R D E R

The Court set the above

- entitled and numbered cause for submission on October 18, 2018

with oral argument. After reviewing the briefs and the record in the above

- entitled and numbered

cause, the Court has determined that oral argument is unnecessary. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 39.1(d). The

case will be submitted to the Court on October 18, 2018 without oral argument.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 8 th day of October

, 20 1 8

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
Adam L. ACOSTA, Petitioner v. COLORADO

No. 19-6709

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Colorado denied.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018214EN.01001001.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 19.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 214/10 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.8929 — Apollo Management/Generali Belgium)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 214/09)

1.

On 11 June 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018214EN.01001001-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Athora Holding Ltd (‘Athora’, Bermuda), which is controlled by Apollo Management L.P. (‘Apollo’, US), and |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Generali Belgium SA (‘Generali Belgium’, Belgium). |

Athora acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Generali Belgium.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are as follows:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Athora is active in insurance and reinsurance in Germany and the United Kingdom, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Apollo is a global investment fund that has holdings in businesses in a range of sectors, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Generali Belgium is a provider of life and non-life insurance, active only in Belgium. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018214EN.01001001-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.8929 — Apollo Management/Generali Belgium

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018214EN.01001001-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018214EN.01001001-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

BRIAN OVERTON

, Appellant,

v.

NSU GRANDE OAKS, LLC
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 2184

[ August 25, 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Nicholas Richard Lopane , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE

19

- 016421 (03)

.

Scott M. Behren of Behren Law Firm, Weston, for appellant.

Richard A. Beauchamp and Benjamin P. Bean of Panza, Maurer & Maynard, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirme d.

K LINGENSMITH

, C.J., G ROSS and D AMOORGIAN

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# C_2018057EN.01000101.xml

| 15.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 57/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 57/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8688 — Northrop Grumman/Orbital ATK)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 57/01)

On 9 February 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8688. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8688. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1313 

To amend the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act to repeal a duplicative 

program relating to inspection and grading of catfish. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 21, 2013 

Mrs. HARTZLER (for herself, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr. FARR, Ms. PINGREE

of Maine, Mr. HUIZENGA of Michigan, Mr. MCINTYRE, Mr. WITTMAN, 

Ms. TSONGAS, Mr. HUELSKAMP, Mrs. ELLMERS, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. 

BENISHEK, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. WEBSTER of Florida, Mrs. 

BLACKBURN, Ms. KUSTER, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Mr. WESTMORELAND, 

Mr. KEATING, Mrs. NEGRETE MCLEOD, Mr. COLLINS of New York, Mr. 

THOMPSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. DINGELL, Mr. RIBBLE, Mr. KING of 

Iowa, and Mr. ROSKAM) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act to repeal 

a duplicative program relating to inspection and grading 

of catfish. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF DUPLICATIVE CATFISH INSPEC4 TION PROGRAM. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Effective on the date of the enact6 ment of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1313 IH

1 (7 U.S.C. 8701 et seq.), section 11016 of such Act (Public 

2 Law 110–246; 122 Stat. 2130) and the amendments made 

3 by such section are repealed. 

4 (b) APPLICATION.—The Agricultural Marketing Act 

5 of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1621 et seq.) and the Federal Meat 

6 Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) shall be applied 

7 and administered as if section 11016 (Public Law 110– 

8 246; 122 Stat. 2130) of the Food, Conservation, and En9 ergy Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 8701 et seq.) and the amend10 ments made by such section had not been enacted. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19-0045V

UNPUBLISHED

JEAN WINGARD,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: March 11, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA)

Jeffrey S. Pop, Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates, Beverly Hills, CA, for petitioner.

Claudia Barnes Gangi, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On January 8, 2019, Jean Wingard filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2 (the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a left Shoulder Injury Related to 

Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered 

on October 20, 2016. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing 

Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On January 30, 2020, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he

concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 

4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent concedes that Petitioner’s alleged injury is 

 1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am 

required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the EGovernment Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to 

the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to 

redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of 

privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such 

material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
2

consistent with a SIRVA as defined on the Vaccine Injury Table Id. at 3. Respondent 

further agrees that Petitioner suffered the residual effects of her condition for more than 

six months. Id.

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Epsilon Energy Ltd. (the “Corporation”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|  | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Corporation. |
|--|-----|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Date: March 29, 2019    |   |
|                    |   |
| /s/ B. Lane Bond        |   |
| B. Lane Bond            |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
Kevin Lyndell YATES, Petitioner v. Amy M. HARPER

No. 19-5546

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133295 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133295 COA: 274849 Genesee CC: 06-018000-FC DENNIS WAYNE VAN CLEVE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 18, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is cons idered. We DIRECT the Genesee County Prosecuting Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after the date of this order.

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.

l0723 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 30, 2007

Clerk
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Francisco Herrera v. Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.

Appellate case number: 01-22-00793-CV

Trial court case number: 2022-29152

Trial court: 281st District Court of Harris County

Appellant Francisco Herrera, Sr. filed an Unopposed Motion to Shorten Deadline for 

Clerk’s Record. The motion is denied.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Veronica Rivas-Molloy

Acting individually 

Date: December 15, 2022
Independent Auditors' Consent



To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
Smith Barney Investment Trust:

We consent to the use of our report dated January 15, 1998, for the Smith 
Barney Large Capitalization Growth Fund of Smith Barney Investment Trust 
incorporated herein by reference.
 



	KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


New York, New York
February 20, 1998
Jonathan P. FLOM, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5857

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Deville MCCANTS, Petitioner, v. Cheryl HANSEN, et al.

No. 19-8095.

Supreme Court of the United States.

June 1, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.