alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018014EN.01001001.xml

| 16.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/10

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-subsidy measures

(2018/C 14/08)

1.   As provided for in Article 18(4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the countervailing measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of subsidisation and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 18(4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Stainless steel wires | India | Anti-subsidy duty | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 861/2013 of 2 September 2013 imposing a definitive countervailing duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain stainless steel wires originating in India (OJ L 240, 7.9.2013, p. 1) | 8.9.2018 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Stainless steel wires

India

Anti-subsidy duty

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 861/2013 of 2 September 2013 imposing a definitive countervailing duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain stainless steel wires originating in India (OJ L 240, 7.9.2013, p. 1)

8.9.2018

---

(1)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 55.

1

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
PARK PROPERTIES ASSOCIATES, L.P., et al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-268

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1123 

To promote consumer choice and wireless competition by permitting 

consumers to unlock mobile wireless devices, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2013 

Mr. GOODLATTE (for himself, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. COBLE, Mr. WATT, Mr. POE

of Texas, and Ms. DELBENE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To promote consumer choice and wireless competition by 

permitting consumers to unlock mobile wireless devices, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Unlocking Consumer 

5 Choice and Wireless Competition Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF EXISTING RULE AND ADDITIONAL 

7 RULEMAKING BY LIBRARIAN OF CONGRESS. 

8 (a) REPEAL AND REPLACE.—Paragraph (3) of sec9 tion 201.40(b) of title 37, Code of Federal Regulations, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 1123 IH

1 as amended and revised by the Librarian of Congress on 

2 October 28, 2012, pursuant to his authority under section 

3 1201(a) of title 17, United States Code, shall have no 

4 force and effect, and such paragraph shall read, and shall 

5 be in effect, as such paragraph was in effect on July 27, 

6 2010. 

7 (b) RULEMAKING.—Not later than 1 year after the 

8 date of enactment of this Act, the Librarian of Congress, 

9 upon the recommendation of the Register of Copyrights, 

10 who shall consult with the Assistant Secretary for Commu11 nications and Information of the Department of Com12 merce and report and comment on his or her views in mak13 ing such recommendation, shall determine, consistent with 

14 the requirements set forth under section 1201(a)(1) of 

15 title 17, United States Code, whether to extend the exemp16 tion for the class of works described in section 

17 201.40(b)(3) of title 37, Code of Federal Regulations, as 

18 amended by subsection (a), to include any other category 

19 of wireless devices in addition to wireless telephone 

20 handsets. 

21 (c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this Act 

22 alters, or shall be construed to alter, the authority of the 

23 Librarian of Congress under section 1201(a)(1) of title 

24 17, United States Code. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

Novem ber 1 , 2017 

# Order

Clerk Novem ber 1 , 2017

15 2655 ( 163 )

In re MARDIGIAN Estate

_________________________________________

MARK S. PAPAZIAN, Executor for the Estate of

ROBERT DOUGLAS MARDIGIAN,

Appellee,

SC: 152655

v COA: 319023

Charlevoix PC : 12

- 011738

- DE

, 12

- 011765

- TV

MELI SSA GOLDBERG, SUSAN V. LUCKEN,

NANCY VARBEDIAN, EDWARD

MARDIGIAN, GRANT MARDIGIAN, and

MATTHEW MARDIGIAN,

Appellants,

and

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA,

Appellee.

________________________________________ /

On order of the C hief Justice

, the motion of the Probate and Estate Planning

Section of State Bar of Michigan to extend the time for filing a brief amicus curiae is

GRANT ED

. The amicus brief will be accepted for filing if submitted on or before

Novem ber 3 , 2017.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY
RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 CERTIFICATIONS
 I, Ronald A. Klein, certify that:
 1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Origen Financial, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




---



##### 



5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
    /s/ Ronald A. KleinRonald A. Klein,Chief Executive Officer of Origen Financial, Inc.
Jon KAISER, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6187

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 12, 2019

*500Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# Official Journal C 148A/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2011.148.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 148A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5419 May 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2011.148.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 148A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5419 May 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 148A/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — fourth supplement to the 29th complete edition | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2011/C 148A/01

Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — fourth supplement to the 29th complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# C_2018447EN.01000402.xml

| 12.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 447/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 447/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9181 — Engie/Prédica Prévoyance Dialogue du Crédit Agricole/Omnes Capital/Equinox VIII A)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 447/08)

On 5 December 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9181. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9181. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Brandon L. BANKS, Petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 19-8078.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 26, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District denied.
Jay Nolan RENOBATO, Petitioner, v. BUREAU OF THE FISCAL SERVICE.

No. 19-290

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. 99-30521 

-1-

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-30521 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

OSCAR RAMIREZ-GONZALES, also known as Edwin Perez,

also known as Oscar Moreno-Bariento, also known as

Oscar De La Cruz,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 99-CR-8-1-A

--------------------

February 16, 2000

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Assistant Federal Public Defender (AFPD) appointed to

represent Oscar Ramirez-Gonzales has filed a motion to withdraw

from representation of Ramirez and a brief as required by Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ramirez has not responded to

counsel’s motion. Our independent review of the brief and the 

record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the APPD’s

motion to withdraw is GRANTED; the AFPD is excused from further
No. 99-30521 

-2-

responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________ ________________ No. 16

- 10269 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket Number 1:13

- cr - 20577

- MGC

- 1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus ROBERT BENEBY, Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ A ppeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

________________________ ( January 6, 2017 ) Before WILSON, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM : Reginald Moss, Jr. , appointed counsel for Robert Beneby in this direct criminal a ppeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the ent ire record, including Beneby’s response to

Case: 16-10269 Date Filed: 01/06/2017 Page: 1 of 22 counsel’s motion, reveals that c ounsel’ s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no

ar guable issues of merit, counsel’ s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Beneby’s conviction s and total sentence are AFFIRMED

.

Case: 16-10269 Date Filed: 01/06/2017 Page: 2 of 2
Gregory T. PIERCE, Petitioner, v. Joe M. ALLBAUGH, Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrections.

No. 18-9176

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 07, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY
RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION In connection with the Quarterly Report of Origen Financial, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned officers, Ronald A. Klein and W. Anderson Geater, Jr., hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to their knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company. /s/ Ronald
A. KleinRonald A. Klein, Chief Executive Officer
    

Dated:
August 16, 2004
 /s/ W. Anderson Geater, Jr.W. Anderson Geater, Jr., Chief Financial Officer
    

Dated:
August 16, 2004
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Physicians Formula Holdings, Inc.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Joseph J.
Jaeger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and




(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350
and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.




Date:
May 11, 2009




By:
            /s/
      Joseph J. JaegerName:
            Joseph
      J. JaegerTitle:
            Chief
      Financial Officer







A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Physicians Formula
Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Physicians Formula
Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund V L.P. (the "Fund") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the Fund's general partner, Boston Capital Associates V L.L.C., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                  
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.



|                |  |                            
|--------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:           |  |                            
|August 14, 2007 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|                |  |                            
|                |  | Marc N. Teal               
|                |  | Principal Financial Officer
|                |  |                            
|                |  |                            



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2018388EN.01000102.xml

| 26.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 388/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 388/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9100 — CK Asset holdings/CK Infrastructure Holdings/APA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 388/02)

On 11 October 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9100. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9100. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 117 (Friday, June 17, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 36426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13076]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Parts 175, 176, 177, and 178

[Docket No. FDA-2016-F-1253]


Natural Resources Defense Council, et al.; Denial of Food 
Additive Petition; Denial Without Prejudice of Food Additive Petition; 
Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notification; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a 
notification that appeared in the Federal Register of May 20, 2022. The 
notification inadvertently mislabeled the copyright status of certain 
references. This document corrects that error.

DATES: This notification is effective June 17, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Meadow Platt, Office of Regulations 
and Policy (HFS-024), Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, 
Food and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus Dr., College Park, MD 20740, 
240-402-2378.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of Friday, May 20, 
2022 (87 FR 31066), in FR. Doc. 2022-10530, the following corrections 
are made:
    On page 31078, in the third column, under ``VI. References,'' 
asterisks are removed from reference numbers 5, 8, and 9 because these 
references are subject to copyright restrictions.

    Dated: June 10, 2022.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-13076 Filed 6-16-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
Antonio Lebaron MELTON, petitioner, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 19-6558

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.