alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 07/09/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       34,143
COMMITMENTS
   2,860    4,650    2,472   27,245   25,403   32,577   32,525    1,566    1,618

CHANGES FROM 07/02/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:         85)
     251      245     -124   -1,601   -1,587   -1,474   -1,466    1,559    1,551

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     8.4     13.6      7.2     79.8     74.4     95.4     95.3      4.6      4.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       39)
       8        6        6       20       19       31       29`

---

Updated July 13, 2013
Report of Independent Accountants

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Salomon Brothers High Income Fund Inc


In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements of Salomon
Brothers High Income Fund Inc (the "Fund") for the year ended December 31,
2000 we considered its internal control, including control activities for
safeguarding securities, in order to determine our auditing procedures for
the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and to
comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on
internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and maintaining
internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and
judgments by management are required to assess the expected benefits and
related costs of controls.  Generally, controls that are relevant to an
audit pertain to the entity's objective of preparing financial statements
for external purposes that are fairly presented in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.  Those controls include the safeguarding of
assets against unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition.
Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or fraud may
occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any evaluation of internal
control to future periods is subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of
their design and operation may deteriorate.
Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily disclose all
matters in internal control that might be material weaknesses under
standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants.  A material weakness is a condition in which the design or
operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce
to a relatively low level the risk that misstatements caused by error or
fraud in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial
statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely
period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned
functions.  However, we noted no matters involving internal control and its
operation, including controls for safeguarding securities, that we consider
to be material weaknesses as defined above as of December 31, 2000.
This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Board of
Directors, management and the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not
intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified
parties.


February 21, 2001
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Salomon Brothers High Income Fund Inc

	(2)
Paul Hillard POSEY, Sr., Petitioner v. TEXAS.

No. 18-9173

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 28, 2009

0921 

# Order

September 28, 2009

139098

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139098 COA: 283619 Wayne CC: 06-008613-FC MARCUS C. WEDGEWORTH, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 28, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
Eduardo DUFFY, aka Eduardo Duffy-Carrasco, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6364

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 19-1743

___________________________

Jack Jordan lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v. U.S. Department of Labor lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - St. Joseph

____________ Submitted: February 12, 2020 Filed: February 21, 2020 [Unpublished]

____________ Before BENTON, SHEPHERD, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Jack Jordan appeals following the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his pro se Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) action. After a careful

1 The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.review, we conclude that the district court did not err in dismissing some cl aims as

duplicative of another pending litigation, see United States Fire Ins. Co. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 920 F.2d 487, 489 n.6 (8th Cir. 1990) (district court’s deci sion to dismiss an action in deference to a pending action in another court is reviewed for abuse of discretion); and in granting summary judgment as to the remainin g claims, see Madel v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 784 F.3d 448, 451 (8th Cir. 2015) (grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo; summary judgment is appropriate where an agency proves that it has fully discharged its obligations under FO IA). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
CERTIFICATIONS



I, Douglas P. Condie, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of STAT Software, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date:  August 20, 2004

/s/ Douglas P. Condie

President
Freddy BROWN, Petitioner v. FLORIDA

No. 18-9159

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1119 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1119

  To prevent funding provided through the Federal Reserve System from 
 being made available to corporations that finance political campaigns 
            or political propaganda, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 13, 2013

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prevent funding provided through the Federal Reserve System from 
 being made available to corporations that finance political campaigns 
            or political propaganda, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Bailouts Are Not For Sale Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ACCESS TO THE FEDERAL RESERVE DISCOUNT WINDOW 
              FOR CORPORATIONS WHICH INTERFERE IN ELECTIONS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 13 of the Federal Reserve 
Act, any other provision of the Federal Reserve Act, or any other 
provision of law, a corporation which has made any independent 
expenditure or any disbursement for an electioneering communication, in 
connection with an election campaign for a Federal office, directly or 
through any affiliate, after the date of the enactment of such Act may 
not have any notes discounted by any Federal reserve bank and may not 
otherwise have access to or receive the benefit of, directly or 
indirectly through any affiliate or third party, any financing provided 
by or through the Board or any Federal reserve bank or any credit 
facility established by the Board or any Federal reserve bank.
    (b) Prompt Reimbursement During Transition.--If any corporation 
subject to subsection (a) has, before the date of the enactment of this 
Act, entered into any transaction or financing arrangement prohibited 
by such subsection, the Board shall require the corporation to unwind 
the transaction and repay any amount outstanding as soon as practicable 
but, in any case, before the end of the 90-day period beginning on such 
date of enactment.
    (c) Regulations.--Before the end of the 90-day period beginning on 
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Board shall prescribe, in 
final form, such regulations as may be appropriate to implement this 
Act.
    (d) Definitions.--For purposes of this section, the terms ``Board'' 
and ``affiliate'' have the same meanings as in section 2 of the Bank 
Holding Company Act of 1956.
    (e) Effective Date.--This Act shall apply as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act, without regard to the effective date of any 
regulation prescribed under subsection (c).
                                 <all>
```
Walter Alberto BANEGAS HERNANDEZ, Petitioner v. William P. BARR, Attorney General.

No. 18-9316

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Antwoine Marquise BEALER, Petitioner v. KERN VALLEY STATE PRISON

No. 19-6449

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# Official Journal C 137/15 M

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 137 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4715 May 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 137

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4715 May 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 137/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2004/C 137/2 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case No. COMP/M.3422 - BBVA/BNL/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 2 |
| 2004/C 137/3 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case No. COMP/M.3435 – Lyondell/Millennium) (2) | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 137/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2004/C 137/2

Prior notification of a concentration (Case No. COMP/M.3422 - BBVA/BNL/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

2

2004/C 137/3

Prior notification of a concentration (Case No. COMP/M.3435 – Lyondell/Millennium) (2)

3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |
| | (2)   Text with EEa relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

(2)   Text with EEa relevance

2

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 4.2


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated July 22, 2019, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 1950 contained in Amendment No.
1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-230873) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned
report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


July 22, 2019
# C_2018435EN.01000101.xml

| 3.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 435/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 435/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9125 — Klio/Bertelsmann/Holtzbrinck/Skoobe)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 435/01)

On 15 November 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9125. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9125. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
**
Exhibit 31.1 

Certification of Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function 

of the Servicer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(d)

**CERTIFICATION**

I, KevinJ. Cullum, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Nissan Auto Receivables 2017-C Owner Trust(the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. I amresponsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National Association 

Date: June 26, 2020 

 
By: 
/s/ Kevin J. Cullum
Kevin J. CullumPresident and Chief Executive Officer ofNissan Motor Acceptance Corporation(senior officer in charge of theservicing function)**
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1106 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1106

   To amend the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 to provide for 
 increased limitations on leverage for multiple licenses under common 
                    control, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 13, 2013

  Mr. Chabot (for himself, Ms. Kuster, Ms. Chu, Mrs. Ellmers, and Mr. 
  Cicilline) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 to provide for 
 increased limitations on leverage for multiple licenses under common 
                    control, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Investment Company 
Modernization Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. IN GENERAL.

    Section 303(b)(2)(B) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 
(15 U.S.C. 683(b)(2)(B)) is amended by striking ``$225,000,000'' and 
inserting ``$350,000,000''.
                                 <all>
```
Raul Molina DEOCAMPO, Petitioner, v. William P. BARR, Attorney General.

No. 19-44

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Daniel Lopez DEJESUS, Petitioner, v. Jeff PREMO, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary.

No. 19-5810

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1139 

To permit aliens who lawfully enter the United States on valid visas as 

nonimmigrant elementary and secondary school students to attend public 

schools in the United States for longer than 1 year if such aliens 

reimburse the local educational agency that administers the school for 

the full, unsubsidized per capita cost of providing education at such 

school for the period of the alien’s attendance. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2013 

Mr. OWENS (for himself, Mr. GIBSON, Mr. MICHAUD, Mr. WELCH, and Mr. 

TONKO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To permit aliens who lawfully enter the United States on 

valid visas as nonimmigrant elementary and secondary 

school students to attend public schools in the United 

States for longer than 1 year if such aliens reimburse 

the local educational agency that administers the school 

for the full, unsubsidized per capita cost of providing 

education at such school for the period of the alien’s 

attendance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 1139 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Strengthening Amer3 ica’s Public Schools Through Promoting Foreign Invest4 ment Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. NONIMMIGRANT ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY 

6 SCHOOL STUDENTS. 

7 Section 214(m)(1)(B) of the Immigration and Na8 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(m)(1)(B)) is amended by 

9 striking ‘‘unless—’’ and all that follows through ‘‘(ii)’’ and 

10 inserting ‘‘unless’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS