alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## F I FTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D24- 0730 LT Case No. 2015

- CF

- 1056

_____________________________ H ERMAN P AUL S OLANO , Petition er,

v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respond ent.

_____________________________ Petition for Belated Appeal

. A Case of Original Jurisdiction. Herma n Paul Solano , Live Oak, pro se. Ashley M oody, Attorney General Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock McGuigan Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent. April 26 , 2 024 P ER C URIAM
. The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the November 6, 2023 order denying defendant’s motion for postconviction relief rendered in Case No. 2015 -C F-1 056, in the Circuit Court in and for St. Johns County, Florida. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).2 P ETITION G RANTED
. L AMBERT , M AC I VER , and J AY , JJ., concur .

____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1350 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1350

To withdraw the Tusayan Ranger District and Federal land managed by the 
 Bureau of Land Management in the vicinity of Kanab Creek and in House 
Rock Valley from location, entry, and patent under the mining laws, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 21, 2013

 Mr. Grijalva (for himself, Mr. Polis, Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New 
  York, Mrs. Napolitano, Mr. Ellison, Mr. Conyers, Ms. Slaughter, Mr. 
 Huffman, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Blumenauer, Ms. McCollum, Mr. Farr, Ms. Chu, 
 Mrs. Kirkpatrick, and Mr. Pastor of Arizona) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To withdraw the Tusayan Ranger District and Federal land managed by the 
 Bureau of Land Management in the vicinity of Kanab Creek and in House 
Rock Valley from location, entry, and patent under the mining laws, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Grand Canyon Watersheds Protection 
Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. WITHDRAWAL OF FEDERAL LAND FROM MINING LAWS.

    (a) Withdrawal.--Subject to subsection (b), the approximately 
982,550 acres of Federal land generally depicted on the map titled 
``Grand Canyon Watersheds Protection Act'' and dated February 22, 2013, 
are hereby withdrawn from--
            (1) all forms of entry, appropriation, and disposal under 
        the public land laws;
            (2) location, entry, and patent under the mining laws; and
            (3) operation of the mineral leasing and geothermal leasing 
        laws and mineral materials laws.
    (b) Treatment of Existing Rights.--The withdrawal under subsection 
(a) is subject to valid, existing rights. If such rights are 
relinquished or otherwise acquired by the United States after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the land that was subject to the rights 
shall be immediately withdrawn in accordance with subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
Bacari MCCARTHREN, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6128

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 12, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 116 (Thursday, June 16, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 36323]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13002]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 5261-023]


Green Mountain Power Corporation; Notice of Intent To Prepare an 
Environmental Assessment

    On August 27, 2021, Green Mountain Power Corporation filed an 
application for a subsequent minor license for the 365-kilowatt Newbury 
Hydroelectric Project (Newbury Project; FERC No. 5261). The Newbury 
Project is located on the Wells River in the Town of Newbury in Orange 
County, Vermont. The project does not occupy federal lands.
    In accordance with the Commission's regulations, on April 6, 2022, 
Commission staff issued a notice that the project was ready for 
environmental analysis (REA Notice). Based on the information in the 
record, including comments filed on the REA Notice, staff does not 
anticipate that licensing the project would constitute a major federal 
action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. 
Therefore, staff intends to prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA) on 
the application to relicense the Newbury Project.
    The EA will be issued and circulated for review by all interested 
parties. All comments filed on the EA will be analyzed by staff and 
considered in the Commission's final licensing decision.
    The application will be processed according to the following 
schedule. Revisions to the schedule may be made as appropriate.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Milestone                           Target date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commission issues EA...................  January 2023.\1\
Comments on EA.........................  February 2023.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Council on Environmental Quality's (CEQ) regulations under 40
  CFR 1501.10(b)(1) require that EAs be completed within 1 year of the
  federal action agency's decision to prepare an EA. This notice
  establishes the Commission's intent to prepare an EA for the Newbury
  Project. Therefore, in accordance with CEQ's regulations, the EA must
  be issued within 1 year of the issuance date of this notice.

    Any questions regarding this notice may be directed to Adam Peer at 
(202) 502-8449 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5e3f3a3f33702e3b3b2c1e383b2c3d70393128"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0c6d686d61227c69697e4c6a697e6f226b637a">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: June 10, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-13002 Filed 6-15-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00519-CR

Zavion Hall

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

117th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 13CR460-B

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed as modified by 

this Court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 19, 2014
4/18/24, 2:35 PM Webmail 7.0 - RE: Waiver of Service of Process - Display Technologies, LLC v. Wondershare Technology Group Co Ltd., Case: 2:24-cv-00046.e...

https://mail.aplus.net/index.php?view=print#279003 1/1

RE: Waiver of Service of Process - Display Technologies, LLC v. Wondershare Technology

Group Co Ltd., Case: 2:24-cv-00046

From: "Ghavimi, Darlene F." <Darlene.Ghavimi@klgates.com>

Date: 03/28/2024 16:41

To: Randall Garteiser <rgarteiser@ghiplaw.com>

Cc: "chonea@ghiplaw.com" <chonea@ghiplaw.com>, Scott Fuller <sfuller@ghiplaw.com>, "Lucas,

Aleighse M." <Aleighse.Lucas@klgates.com>, Colin Jensen <cjensen@ghiplaw.com>, "Garteiser Honea

Patent Asset Management Team" <ghpam@ghiplaw.com>

Randall,

You called my office line and it should have given you the option to leave a message.  I

will check with IT.  I am working from home today and tomorrow.  I have conveyed your

message to my client and will respond when I have an answer.  Please understand the

time difference may delay the answer.

Thanks,

Darlene

From: Randall Garteiser <rgarteiser@ghiplaw.com>

Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2024 4:07 PM

To: Ghavimi, Darlene F. <Darlene.Ghavimi@klgates.com>

Cc: chonea@ghiplaw.com; Scott Fuller <sfuller@ghiplaw.com>; Lucas, Aleighse M.

<Aleighse.Lucas@klgates.com>; Colin Jensen <cjensen@ghiplaw.com>; Garteiser Honea Patent Asset

Management Team <ghpam@ghiplaw.com>

Subject: Waiver of Service of Process - Display Technologies, LLC v. Wondershare Technology Group Co Ltd.,

Case: 2:24-cv-00046

Ms. Ghavimi: On behalf of Display Technologies, I attempted to call you. And when I did at you phone number 512. 482. 6919 it rang about 3 times and then just hung up. Is there a better number to reach you at? Separately, we looked at your client’s

Ms. Ghavimi:

On behalf of Display Technologies, I attempted to call you. And when I did at you phone number 512.482.6919

it rang about 3 times and then just hung up. Is there a better number to reach you at?

Separately, we looked at your client’s motion under Rule 12. Our process server apologized to us as he was

supposed to serve the Secretary of State and failed to do so. Appreciate you bringing to this to our attention,

but next time just reach out and let us know about the issue.

Will Wondershare agree to waive service for a 60 or 90 day extension under Rule 4.

Be well,

Randall Garteiser 

415.568.0553

This electronic message contains information from the law firm of K&L Gates LLP. The contents may be privileged and confidential and are intended for

the use of the intended addressee(s) only. If you are not an intended addressee, note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of

this message is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact me at Darlene.Ghavimi@klgates.com.-5

Case 2:23-cv-00585-JRG-RSP Document 24-6 Filed 05/11/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 873
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 12

- 14978 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________
D.C. Docket No. 5:11

- cr

- 00042

- RS

- 4

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus

MEREDITH LELANN KING,

Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida

________________________ (July 30, 2013)

Before TJOFLAT

, PRYOR and MARTIN , Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Gwendolyn Spivey , appointed counsel for Meredith Lelann King in this

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further repre sentation of Ms.

King and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct.

Case: 12-14978 Date Filed: 07/30/2013 Page: 1 of 22 1396 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s

assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independe nt

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s

motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Ms. King’s conviction and sentence are

AFFIRMED

. Case: 12-14978 Date Filed: 07/30/2013 Page: 2 of 2
**CERTIFICATION**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                             | /s/                Abraham Havron      |   |
|----------------------------------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                             | Abraham                Havron          |   |
|                             | Chief                Executive Officer |   |
|                             | Modigene                Inc.           |   |
| November                14, 2008 |                                   |   |

----
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Union Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended January 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|Date: April 30, 2018 |        | /s/ Kyle P. Bransfield                                                                                
|-------------------- | ------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     | Name:  | Kyle P. Bransfield                                                                                    
|                     | Title: | Chief Executive Officer 
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal 
Financial and Accounting Officer)



---
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1166 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 100 North Church 

Street in Las Cruces, New Mexico, as the ‘‘Edwin L. Mechem United 

States Courthouse’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 14, 2013 

Mr. PEARCE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 100 

North Church Street in Las Cruces, New Mexico, as 

the ‘‘Edwin L. Mechem United States Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

4 Congress finds the following: 

5 (1) Edwin L. Mechem was a land surveyor with 

6 the United States Reclamation Service in Las 

7 Cruces, New Mexico, from 1932–1935. 

8 (2) He served as a member of the New Mexico 

9 State Police Commission. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1166 IH

1 (3) He was a Special Agent with the Federal 

2 Bureau of Investigation. 

3 (4) He attended the New Mexico College of Ag4 riculture and Mechanic Arts, which later became the 

5 New Mexico State University in Las Cruces, New 

6 Mexico. 

7 (5) He was admitted to the New Mexico bar in 

8 1939, and practiced law in Albuquerque and Las 

9 Cruces, New Mexico. 

10 (6) He served in the New Mexico House of 

11 Representatives from 1947–1948. 

12 (7) He was the first New Mexico governor born 

13 in New Mexico after statehood. 

14 (8) He served four terms as Governor of New 

15 Mexico between 1951 and 1962. 

16 (9) He served as a United States Senator from 

17 New Mexico from 1962–1964. 

18 (10) He was confirmed by the United States 

19 Senate as a United States District Judge for the 

20 District of New Mexico on October 8, 1970, and 

21 served in that position until his death in 2002. 

22 (11) He led a rich and accomplished life dedi23 cated to public service which warrants recognition. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1166 IH

1 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION. 

2 The United States courthouse located at 100 North 

3 Church Street in Las Cruces, New Mexico, shall be known 

4 and designated as the ‘‘Edwin L. Mechem United States 

5 Courthouse’’. 

6 SEC. 3. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

9 States courthouse referred to in section 2 shall be deemed 

10 to be a reference to the ‘‘Edwin L. Mechem United States 

11 Courthouse’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 10.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the inclusion of our
report dated February 6, 2004, relating to the financial statement of Utix
Group, Inc. (formally known as Corporate Sports Incentives, Inc.) in this Form
10SB. Our report contains an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern. It should be noted that we have not
audited any financial statements of the Company subsequent to September 30, 2003
or performed any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report.



VITALE, CATURANO & COMPANY, P.C.

February 12, 2004
Boston, Massachusetts
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 08-1398

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Western District of Missouri. * Joshua R. Clifton, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: October 13, 2008 Filed: March 24, 2009

___________ Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Joshua Ryan Clifton pled guilty to be ing a felon in possession of ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924( a)(2). The district court applied a “crime of violence” sentencing enhancement due to a prior Missouri conviction for auto tampering, and imposed a 120-month se ntence, the statutory maximum. Clifton appeals, arguing that auto tampering doe s not qualify as a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2. In United States v. Williams , 537 F.3d 969 (8th Cir. 2008), this court held that auto tampering is not a cr ime of violence. Accordingly, this court vacates the sentence, and remands for resentencing.

______________________________
Joseph MALCOMB, Petitioner v. PENNSYLVANIA

No. 18-9135

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh Office denied.
Report of Independent Accountants

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Salomon Brothers Series Funds Inc


In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements of Salomon
Brothers Institutional Money Market Fund, Salomon Brothers New York
Municipal Money Market Fund and Salomon Brothers Cash Management Fund (three
of the portfolios constituting Salomon Brothers Series Funds Inc, hereafter
referred to as the "Fund") for the year ended December 31, 2000 we
considered its internal control, including control activities for
safeguarding securities, in order to determine our auditing procedures for
the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and to
comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on
internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and maintaining
internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and
judgments by management are required to assess the expected benefits and
related costs of controls.  Generally, controls that are relevant to an
audit pertain to the entity's objective of preparing financial statements
for external purposes that are fairly presented in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.  Those controls include the safeguarding of
assets against unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition.
Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or fraud may
occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any evaluation of internal
control to future periods is subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of
their design and operation may deteriorate.
Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily disclose all
matters in internal control that might be material weaknesses under
standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants.  A material weakness is a condition in which the design or
operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce
to a relatively low level the risk that misstatements caused by error or
fraud in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial
statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely
period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned
functions.  However, we noted no matters involving internal control and its
operation, including controls for safeguarding securities, that we consider
to be material weaknesses as defined above as of December 31, 2000.
This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Board of
Directors, management and the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not
intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified
parties.


February 16, 2001
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Salomon Brothers Series Funds Inc

	(2)
Antoaneta IOTOVA, et al., Petitioners, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al.

No. 19-5084.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Otish Resources, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the three month period ending November 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Stan Ford, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Controller, Director and Secretary of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Otish Resources, Inc., and will be retained by Otish Resources, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







/s/   Stan Ford

Stan Ford, Chief Executive Officer,

Chief Financial Officer, Controller,

Director and Secretary



Date:  January 5, 2006