alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018451EN.01000101.xml

| 14.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 451/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 451/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9124 — Dana/Oerlikon Drive Systems)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 451/01)

On 5 December 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9124. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9124. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Farid John POPAL, Petitioner v. NEW YORK

No. 19-6103

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York denied.
# C_2005296EN.01001001.xml

| 26.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/10

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hajdú-Bihar Megyei Bíróság by order of that court of 3 March 2005 in Ákos Nádasdi v Vám- és Pénzügyőrség Észak-Alföldi Regionális Parancsnoksága

(Case C-290/05)

(2005/C 296/19)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Hajdú-Bihar Megyei Bíróság (Hungary) of 3 March 2005, received at the Court Registry on 19 July 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Ákos Nádasdi and Vám- és Pénzügyőrség Észak-Alföldi Regionális Parancsnoksága on the following questions:

| 1. | Does the first paragraph of Article 90 EC allow Member States to maintain in force a duty on used motor vehicles from other Member States, when that duty is wholly independent of the value of the vehicle and the amount is determined solely on the basis of the technical characteristics of the vehicle (engine type, engine capacity) and its environmental classification? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does the first paragraph of Article 90 EC allow Member States to maintain in force a duty on used motor vehicles from other Member States, when that duty is wholly independent of the value of the vehicle and the amount is determined solely on the basis of the technical characteristics of the vehicle (engine type, engine capacity) and its environmental classification?

| 2. | If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, is Law No CX of 2003 on registration duty, which is applicable in this case, compatible, as regards imported used motor vehicles, with the first paragraph of Article 90 EC when the registration duty is not payable on motor vehicles which were placed in circulation in Hungary before the law in question entered into force? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, is Law No CX of 2003 on registration duty, which is applicable in this case, compatible, as regards imported used motor vehicles, with the first paragraph of Article 90 EC when the registration duty is not payable on motor vehicles which were placed in circulation in Hungary before the law in question entered into force?

---
John P. GREINER, Petitioner v. MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN, et al.

No. 19-5052

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until October 28, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Ndokley Peter ENOW, Petitioner v. Ricky FOXWELL, Warden, et al.

No. 19-5606

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

The petition for rehearing is denied.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 of Convenientcast, Inc. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.
 
 Very truly yours,
 
 
 /s/Kevin M. MurphyKevin M. MurphyChief Executive OfficerMay 19, 2011/s/ Howard BouchHoward BouchChief Financial OfficerMay 19, 2011
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to 
Convenientcast, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.16


 


	
  

  
	
  IAE Building

  400 Main Street

  East Hartford, CT 06108 USA

  



 


	
  10 November 2003

  	
   

  	
   

  



 


JetBlue Airways Corporation


19 Old Kings Highway South, Suite 23


Darien, Connecticut 06820


Attention: Vice President and Treasurer


 


	
  Subject:

  	
  Side
  Letter No. 15 to the V2500 General Terms of Sale Agreement between JetBlue
  Airways Corporation and IAE International Aero Engines AG dated May 4,
  1999

  



 


Dear Tom:


 


IAE is
pleased to submit to JetBlue this Side Letter No. 15 to the Agreement in
support of JetBlue’s ***:


 


1.                                       A *** 2004 delivery aircraft shall now be scheduled for delivery in ***
2004.


 


The
parties agree to reflect this change in the JetBlue Aircraft delivery schedule.


 


Except as expressly amended by this Side Letter No. 15 all provisions
of the Agreement remain in full force and effect.


 


	
  Very truly yours,

  	
   

  	
  Agreed to and Accepted on behalf of:

  
	
  IAE International Aero Engines AG

  	
   

  	
  JetBlue Airways Corporation

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Name

  	
   

  	
  Name

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Title

  	
   

  	
  Title

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Date

  	
   

  	
  Date

  



 


 












[***]                   Represents
material which has been redacted and filed separately with the Commission
pursuant to a request for confidential treatment pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


 


1
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1171 

AN ACT 

To amend title 40, United States Code, to improve veterans 

service organizations access to Federal surplus personal 

property. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1171 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Formerly Owned Re3 sources for Veterans to Express Thanks for Service Act 

4 of 2013’’ or the ‘‘FOR VETS Act of 2013’’. 

5 SEC. 2. VETERANS ACCESS TO FEDERAL EXCESS AND SUR6 PLUS PERSONAL PROPERTY. 

7 Section 549(c)(3) of title 40, United States Code, is 

8 amended— 

9 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

10 the end; 

11 (2) in subparagraph (B)— 

12 (A) in clause (viii), by adding ‘‘or’’ at the 

13 end; and 

14 (B) by striking clause (x); and 

15 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

16 ‘‘(C) for purposes of providing services to 

17 veterans (as defined in section 101 of title 38), 

18 to an organization whose— 

19 ‘‘(i) membership comprises substan20 tially veterans; and 
3 

•HR 1171 EH

1 ‘‘(ii) representatives are recognized by 

2 the Secretary of Veterans Affairs under 

3 section 5902 of title 38.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 8, 2013. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1171 

AN ACT 

To amend title 40, United States Code, to improve 

surplus personal property. veterans service organizations access to Federal
Morris SANDERS, Petitioner, v. WALMART STORES EAST, L.P.

No. 18-9410

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 07, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Anthony Mark SMITH, Jr., Petitioner v. VIRGINIA

No. 19-6145

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000919557
<NAME> Smith Barney Mid Cap Portfolio
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER>015
   <NAME>Travelers Series Fund Inc.

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 Oct-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                      Oct-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>              15,461,053
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>             17,614,419
<RECEIVABLES>                         103,111
<ASSETS-OTHER>                            475
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     17,718,005
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>              173,276
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>              46,825
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                   220,101
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                             0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>           15,364,614
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>               1,230,367
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                       0
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>              61,655
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                      0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>               (48,793)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                    0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>            2,120,428
<NET-ASSETS>                       17,497,904
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                      42,735
<INTEREST-INCOME>                     111,535
<OTHER-INCOME>                              0
<EXPENSES-NET>                         87,609
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                66,661
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>              (48,793)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>           2,120,428
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>               2,138,296
<EQUALIZATION>                              0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>               5,006
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                    0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                       0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>             1,321,458
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>            91,525
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                       434
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>             17,497,904
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                     0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                   0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                     0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                  0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                  69,165
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                       136,401
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                9,261,488
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                  10.000
<PER-SHARE-NII>                         0.060
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                 4.170
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                    0.010
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>               0.000
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                    0.000
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                    14.220
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                          0.95



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1









CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS



We hereby consent to the references to our firm in the form and
context in which they are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (including any amendments thereto) filed by PermRock Royalty
Trust (“Annual Report”), to our estimates of reserves and value of reserves and our report on reserves as of December 31,
2020, December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2022 of the underlying properties and net profits interest owned by PermRock Royalty Trust
and to the inclusion of our report dated March 14, 2023 as an Exhibit to the Annual Report.









| | Sincerely,                             
| | ---------------------------------------
| |                                        
| |                                        
| |                                        
| | Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc.   
| | Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-693



March 31, 2023

Fort Worth, Texas
H. Con. Res. 92 Agreed to April 7, 2014

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 

SECTION 1. USE OF THE CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NATIONAL PEACE 

OFFICERS MEMORIAL SERVICE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Grand Lodge of the Fraternal Order 

of Police and its auxiliary shall be permitted to sponsor a public 

event, the 33rd Annual National Peace Officers Memorial Service 

(in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Memorial Service’’), on the 

Capitol Grounds, in order to honor the law enforcement officers 

who died in the line of duty during 2013. 

(b) DATE OF MEMORIAL SERVICE.—The Memorial Service shall 

be held on May 15, 2014, or on such other date as the Speaker 

of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and 

Administration of the Senate jointly designate, with preparation 

for the event to begin on May 12, 2014. 

SEC. 2. USE OF THE CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NATIONAL HONOR GUARD 

AND PIPE BAND EXHIBITION. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Grand Lodge of the Fraternal Order 

of Police and its auxiliary shall be permitted to sponsor a public 

event, the National Honor Guard and Pipe Band Exhibition (in 

this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Exhibition’’), on the Capitol 

Grounds, in order to allow law enforcement representatives to 

exhibit their ability to demonstrate Honor Guard programs and 

provide for a bag pipe exhibition. 

(b) DATE OF EXHIBITION.—The exhibition shall be held on May 

14, 2014, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House 

of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration 

of the Senate jointly designate. 

SEC. 3. TERMS AND CONDITIONS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Under conditions to be prescribed by the 

Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board, the event 

shall be— 

(1) free of admission charge and open to the public; and 

(2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress. 

(b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—The sponsors of the Memorial 

Service and Exhibition shall assume full responsibility for all 

expenses and liabilities incident to all activities associated with 

the events. 

SEC. 4. EVENT PREPARATIONS. 

Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the 

sponsors referred to in section 3(b) are authorized to erect upon 
H. Con. Res. 92—2 

the Capitol Grounds such stage, sound amplification devices, and 

other related structures and equipment, as may be required for 

the Memorial Service and Exhibition. 

SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 

restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 

Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations 

on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable 

to the Capitol Grounds, in connection with the events. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate.
# Official Journal C 35/2015

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 35 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 583 February 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 35

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 583 February 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 035/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2015/C 035/02 | Commission communication concerning the procedure laid down by Article 1(4) of Council Directive 96/67/EC | 2 |
| 2015/C 035/03 | Commission communication concerning the procedure laid down by Article 1(4) of Council Directive 96/67/EC | 6 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 035/01

Euro exchange rates

1

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2015/C 035/02

Commission communication concerning the procedure laid down by Article 1(4) of Council Directive 96/67/EC

2

2015/C 035/03

Commission communication concerning the procedure laid down by Article 1(4) of Council Directive 96/67/EC

6

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 035/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7487 — Onex Corporation/SIG Group) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 10 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2015/C 035/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7487 — Onex Corporation/SIG Group) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

10

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7569

JAMES MALLARD, Petitioner - Appellant, versus SUPERINTENDENT PERLMAN, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-05-436) Submitted: December 21, 2005 Decided: January 11, 2006 Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Mallard, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: James Mallard moves for a certificate of appealability, seeking review of the district court's order dismissing as successive his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 338 (2003); Sl ack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Mallard has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny the motion for a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
10f-3 REPORT

               SMITH BARNEY INVESTMENT FUNDS
             SMITH BARNEY SMALL CAP GROWTH FUND

             March 1, 2000 through May 31, 2000

                      Trade                                             % of
Issuer                Date      Selling Dealer         Amount   Price   Issue(1)

Switchboard           03/02/00  Banc Boston Robertson  $15,000  $15.00  0.04%A

Versata               03/03/00  Thomas Weisel            2,400   24.00  0.01

Silicon Laboratories  03/24/00  Morgan Stanley DW      310,000   31.00  0.31

Oni Systems           05/31/00  Goldman Sachs          100,000   25.00  0.13B


(1) Represents purchases by all affiliated funds; may not exceed
25% of the principal amount of the offering.

A - Includes purchases of $14,775 by other SB Mutual Funds.
B - Includes purchases of $150,000 by other SB Mutual Funds.
OWNER OPERATOR INDEPENDENT DRIVERS ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., Petitioners v. PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION, et al.

No. 19-762

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-20517 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JUAN IBARRA-PENALOZA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-19-1

-------------------- February 21, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The court-appointed attorney for Juan Ibarra-Penaloza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ibarra has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief, but he has not filed a
response . Our review of the brief filed by counsel and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excusedNo. -2- from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
AMARIN PHARMA, INC., et al., Petitioners v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, et al.

No. 19-152

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Green Energy Holding Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A, amendment number 1 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the "Report'), Robert A.
Hildebrand, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 USC
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
May 13, 2008


/s/ Robert A.
Hildebrand


Robert A. Hildebrand, Chief Financial Officer
CAPITAL ASSOCIATED INDUSTRIES, INC., Petitioner v. Josh STEIN, Attorney General of North Carolina, et al.

No. 19-281

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 16, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.