alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1085 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1085

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to extend 
   to 2025 the production certificate program that allows refunds of 
     duties on certain articles produced in United States insular 
                              possessions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 12, 2013

 Mrs. Christensen introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to extend 
   to 2025 the production certificate program that allows refunds of 
     duties on certain articles produced in United States insular 
                              possessions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF PRODUCTION CERTIFICATE PROGRAM FOR CERTAIN 
              PRODUCTS OF UNITED STATES INSULAR POSSESSIONS.

    Additional U.S. Note 5(h)(i) to chapter 91 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``2015'' and 
inserting ``2025''.
                                 <all>
```
# Official Journal C 321/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 321 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6225 September 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 321

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6225 September 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 321/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 321/01

Euro exchange rates

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 321/02 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9460 — Capgemini/Altran) (
  1
  ) | 2 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2019/C 321/02

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9460 — Capgemini/Altran) (
  1
  )

1

2

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1300 

AN ACT 

To amend the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956 to reauthorize 

the volunteer programs and community partnerships for 

the benefit of national wildlife refuges, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1300 EH

1 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF NATIONAL WILDLIFE 

2 REFUGE SYSTEM VOLUNTEER, COMMUNITY 

3 PARTNERSHIP, AND EDUCATION PROGRAMS. 

4 Section 7(g) of the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956 

5 (16 U.S.C. 742f(g)) is amended by striking ‘‘2011 

6 through 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘2015 through 2017’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 30, 2013. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1300 

AN ACT 

To amend the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956 to rerefuges, and for other purposes. partnerships for the benefit of national wildlife authorize the volunteer programs and community
Kenneth Allen ROGERS, Petitioner v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 19-6024

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District denied.
mt.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0611

TERRY WALLACE,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

V.

LAW OFFICE OF BRUCE SPENCER, PLLC,

LPH, WC, a Montana Corporation, GEISZLER

STEELE, PC, and John Does 1-5,

Defendants and Appellees.

FILED

JUN 0 1 2021

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of Suprema Court

State of Montana

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant's motion for an extension of time to file the reply

brief, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and

including July 8, 2021, within which to file the reply brief.

No further extensions will be granted.

DATED this day of June, 2021.

For the Court,

Chief Justice

06/01/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0611
The HONORABLE DAVID S. DOTY, United States District Judge for

the District of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 96-2789

___________

Morris Lynn Johnson, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

United States of America, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: March 4, 1997

 Filed: March 10, 1997

___________

Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Morris Johnson appeals from the district court's order

1

dismissing without prejudice for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction his motion to expunge or correct records of the Bureau

of Prisons and the United States Parole Commission. Reviewing de

novo, we conclude that Johnson's motion was properly construed as

an attack on the execution of his sentence, and as such, is

cognizable in a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition filed in a court with

jurisdiction over Johnson's present custodian. See Bell v. United

States, 48 F.3d 1042, 1043-44 (8th Cir. 1995); Schneider v. United
-2-

States, 27 F.3d 1327, 1331 (8th Cir. 1994) (standard of review),

cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 723 (1995). As Johnson is incarcerated in
-3-

Illinois, his petition was not properly filed in the District of

Minnesota. Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 35.1








ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC








The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer pursuant to Section 3.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of January 1, 2018 (the "Sale and Servicing Agreement") among CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2018-2, as Issuer (the "Issuer"), CarMax Auto Funding LLC, as Depositor, and CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer (the "Servicer"), does hereby certify that:





|   |                                                                                                              
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | CarMax Business Services, LLC is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.




|   |                                                                                      
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate.




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|3. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning on April 25, 2018 and ending onFebruary 28, 2019and of the Servicer's performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was made under my supervision.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.







Capitalized terms used in this certificate and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Sale and Servicing Agreement.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Servicer, has duly executed this Officer's Certificate this 23rd day of May, 2019 .





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC





/s/ Enrique Mayor-Mora


Enrique Mayor-Mora


Vice President and Treasurer
EXHIBIT
32.2





Certification
of the Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of K-Fed Bancorp (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dustin Luton, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.
            The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the company’s financial condition and results of
      operations.











Date:
      November 9,
      2009
            /s/ Dustin LutonDustin
      LutonChief
      Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 7, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 34679]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12238]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL22-44-000]


Grand River Dam Authority; Notice of Conference Call

    On Monday, June 13, 2022, Commission staff will hold a conference 
call with Grand River Dam Authority (Grand River) beginning at 2:00 
p.m. (Eastern Time). The purpose of the conference call is to discuss 
Grand River's formula rate protocols. The discussion during the 
conference call will be limited to this matter.
    All interested parties are invited to listen by phone. The 
conference call will not be webcasted or transcribed. However, an audio 
listen-only line will be provided. Those wishing to access the listen-
only line must email Nishi Parekh at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#733d1a001b1a5d23120116181b33151601105d141c05"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="16587f657e7f38467764737d7e567073647538717960">[email protected]</span></a> by 5:00 p.m. 
(Eastern Time) on Thursday, June 9, 2022, with your name, email, and 
phone number, in order to receive the call-in information before the 
conference call. Please use the following text for the subject line, 
``EL22-44-000 listen-only line registration.''
    Commission conferences are accessible under section 508 of the 
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations, please 
send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6c0d0f0f091f1f050e05000518152c0a091e0f420b031a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a9c8cacaccdadac0cbc0c5c0ddd0e9cfccdbca87cec6df">[email protected]</span></a> or call toll free 1 (866) 208-
3372 (voice) or (202) 208-1659 (TTY), or send a FAX to (202) 208-2106 
with the required accommodations.
    For additional information, please contact Nishi Parekh at (202) 
502-8325 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9dd3f4eef5f4b3cdfceff8f6f5ddfbf8effeb3faf2eb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="06486f756e6f28566774636d6e466063746528616970">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: June 1, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-12238 Filed 6-6-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Corey KIDD, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6108

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-20748 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus PATRICK O. EHIOGHAE, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-184-1

-------------------- August 7, 2001 Before DAVIS, JONES, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Patrick O. Ehioghae has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ehioghae has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CertificatePursuant to Rule 15d-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**

I, Paul Block, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of MerisantCompany (the “registrant”);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

(a)                                  Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)                                 Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)                                  Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

(a)                                  Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)                                 Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date: November 13, 2007
|   |   | /s/ Paul Block                 |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------|
|   |   | Name: Paul Block               |
|   |   | Title: Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
----

Removal from the Register of Case T-108/02 (1)

(2004/C 262/110)

(Language of the case: French)

By order of 2 August 2004, the President of the Fourth Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the Register of Case T-108/02, Jégo-Quéré & Cie S.A. v Commission of the European Communities.

----

(1)OJ C 144 of 15.6.2002.

----
Independent Auditors' Consent



To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
the Ohio and National Portfolios of Smith Barney Muni Funds:

We consent to the use of our reports dated May 14, 1997 and May 
16, 1997 for the Ohio and National Portfolios, respectively, of 
Smith Barney Muni Funds, incorporated herein by reference and to 
the references to our Firm under the heading "Financial 
Statements and Experts" in the Prospectus/Proxy Statement.




KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


New York, New York
September 24, 1997
IN RE Todd C. BANK, Petitioner.

No. 19-544

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
SMITH BARNEY FUNDS, INC.
On behalf of the
U.S. GOVERNMENT SECURITIES FUND (the "Fund")

Supplement dated June 7, 1999 to
Prospectus dated April 30, 1999


The following information revises, and to the extent
inconsistent therewith, supersedes, the information contained in the
Prospectus of the Fund (the "Prospectus"): under the section
"Choosing a class of shares to buy."

Investment minimums.  Minimum initial and additional investment
amounts vary depending on the class of shares you buy and the nature
of your investment account.


Initial


Additional


Classes A
, B, L
Class
Y
All
Classes
General
$1,000
$15
millio
n
$50
Individual Retirement
Accounts,
Self Employed Retirement
Plans, Uniform Gift to
Minor Accounts
$250
$15
millio
n
$50
Qualified Retirement
Plans
$25
$15
millio
n
$25
Simple IRAs
$1
N/a
$1
Monthly Systematic
Investment Plans
$25
N/a
$25
Quarterly Systematic
Investment Plans
$50
N/a
$50

Qualified Retirement Plans are retirement plans qualified under
Section 403(b)(7) or Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code,
including 401(k) plans


The following revises and supersedes, as applicable, the information
in the Prospectus under "Sales charges."

Class Y shares
You buy Class Y shares at net asset value with no initial sales
charge and no deferred sales charge when you redeem. You must meet
the $15,000,000 initial investment requirement. You can use a letter
of intent to meet this requirement by buying Class Y shares of the
fund over a 13 month period. To qualify, you must initially invest
$5,000,000.



FD 01658
G:\Fund Accounting\Legal\FUNDS\SBFI\1999\SECDOCS\599stk.doc
# Official Journal C 275/8 No

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 275 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 488 November 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 275

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 488 November 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 275/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2005/C 275/2 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3983 — Polestar/Prisa/Ibersuizas /Iberian Capital/Dédalo) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 2 |
| 2005/C 275/3 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 3 |
| 2005/C 275/4 | Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Council Directive 93/42/EEC concerning medical devices (1) | 5 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 275/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2005/C 275/2

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3983 — Polestar/Prisa/Ibersuizas /Iberian Capital/Dédalo) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

2

2005/C 275/3

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

3

2005/C 275/4

Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Council Directive 93/42/EEC concerning medical devices (1)

5

---

| | III   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 275/5 | Call for proposals — DG EAC No 59/05 — Community action programme to support bodies working in the field of active European citizenship — ‘Annual work programme of a body which pursues an aim of general European interest in the field of active European citizenship or an objective forming part of the European Union's activities in this area’ — Budget items 15 060103/15 060105 | 13 |

III   Notices

Commission

2005/C 275/5

Call for proposals — DG EAC No 59/05 — Community action programme to support bodies working in the field of active European citizenship — ‘Annual work programme of a body which pursues an aim of general European interest in the field of active European citizenship or an objective forming part of the European Union's activities in this area’ — Budget items 15 060103/15 060105

13

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2005/C 275/6 | Notice | s3 |

2005/C 275/6

Notice

Notice

s3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk September 4, 2012

h0827 

# Order

September 4, 2012

142608

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 142608

COA: 295159

Bay CC: 08

- 010720

- FH

QUINTEZ KERNARD ALLEN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 20, 2011

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
In the MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF Marc Norman SILBERMAN

No. D-3047

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Disbarment order entered.