alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 58 

Prohibiting the use of funds available to any United States Government 

department or agency for the use of force in, or directed at, Syria 

by the United States Armed Forces. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2013 

Mr. POE of Texas introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee 

on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Prohibiting the use of funds available to any United States 

Government department or agency for the use of force 

in, or directed at, Syria by the United States Armed 

Forces. 

Whereas the Government of Syria has not declared war or 

initiated hostilities against the United States or its allies; 

and 

Whereas Article 1, Section 8, of the United States Constitution states that Congress shall have the power ‘‘To declare War’’, ‘‘To raise and support Armies’’, ‘‘To provide 

and maintain a Navy’’, and ‘‘To make Rules for the GovVerDate Mar 15 2010 01:27 Sep 10, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HJ58.IH HJ58

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 58 IH 

ernment and Regulation of the land and naval Forces’’: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

4 It is the sense of Congress that— 

5 (1) the American people and Congress do not 

6 support the use of the United States Armed Forces 

7 in, or directed at, Syria; and 

8 (2) there are not overriding imminent national 

9 security interests of the United States at stake and 

10 Congress will not fund any military action taken in 

11 contradiction to this joint resolution. 

12 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR USE OF 

13 FORCE AGAINST SYRIA. 

14 No funds available to any United States Government 

15 department or agency may be used for the use of force 

16 in, or directed at, Syria by the United States Armed 

17 Forces unless a subsequent Act of Congress specifically 

18 authorizes such use of force or there is an attack or immi19 nent attack on the United States, its territories or posses20 sions, or the United States Armed Forces. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CertificatePursuant to Rule 15d-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**

I, Paul Block, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of MerisantCompany (the “registrant”);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

(a)                                  Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)                                 Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)                                  Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

(a)                                  Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)                                 Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date: August 10, 2007
|        |   | /s/ Paul Block                 |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------|
|   |   | Name: Paul Block               |
|   |   | Title: Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1244 

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to provide 

flexibility to school food authorities in meeting certain nutritional requirements for the school lunch and breakfast programs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 19, 2013 

Mr. CRAWFORD (for himself, Mr. GRIFFIN of Arkansas, Mr. WOMACK, and 

Mr. COTTON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch 

Act to provide flexibility to school food authorities in 

meeting certain nutritional requirements for the school 

lunch and breakfast programs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sensible School Lunch 

5 Act’’. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1244 IH

1 SEC. 2. NUTRITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SCHOOL 

2 LUNCH AND BREAKFAST PROGRAMS. 

3 (a) ADDITIONAL REIMBURSEMENT.—Section 

4 4(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Richard B. Russell National School 

5 Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1753(b)(3)(A)(ii)) is amended by 

6 adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(III) MAXIMUM QUANTITIES.— 

8 The interim or final regulations re9 quired under this clause shall not es10 tablish a maximum quantity of grains, 

11 meat, or meat alternates that may be 

12 served in any meal or during any pe13 riod of time of any school year.’’. 

14 (b) RULES.—Section 9(a)(4)(B) of the Richard B. 

15 Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 

16 1758(a)(4)(B)) is amended— 

17 (1) by striking ‘‘Not later’’ and inserting the 

18 following: 

19 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Subject to clause 

20 (ii), not later’’; and 

21 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

22 ‘‘(ii) MAXIMUM QUANTITIES.—The 

23 rules required under clause (ii) shall not 

24 establish a maximum quantity of grains, 

25 meat, or meat alternates that may be 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1244 IH

1 served in any meal or during any period of 

2 time of any school year.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
The Estate of Heather Marie SIZEMORE, Alan Ray Sizemore, Administrator v. Dennis Paul KIMBLETON; Frye Regional Medical Center, Inc.; Tenet Healthsystem CM, Inc.; Tenet Healthsystem Medical, Inc.; Tenet Physician Services-Frye Regional, Inc.; Tenet Physician Services of the Southeast, Inc.; Amisub of North Carolina, Inc. d/b/a Frye Regional Medical Center; Sterling Miami, Inc. f/k/a Sterling Health Care Group, Inc.; FPA Medical Management of North Carolina, Inc.; FPA Medical Management of Florida, Inc.; Phyamerica Physician Group, Inc.; Phyamerica Physician Services, Inc.; Phyamerica Emergency Services of North Carolina, P.A.; Phyamerica Physician Networks, Inc.; Phyamerica Physician Services of the Southeast, Inc.; Catawba County; Catawba County Emergency Services; and Catawba County EMS.

No. 368P02.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2004.

O. William Faison, John W. Jensen, Evett N. Brown, Durham, for Sizemore.

Burley B. Mitchell, Jr., Raleigh, Tyrus V. Dahl, Jr., Winston-Salem, Oliver M. Read, IV, for Catawba County.

***ORDER***

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 5 February 2004 for limited purpose of remand to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of this Court's decision in *Dawes v. Nash County,*357 N.C. 442, 584 S.E.2d 760 (2003).

By order of the Court in Conference, this 5th day of February, 2004.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1115 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to prohibit any national 

securities exchange from effecting any transaction in a security issued 

by a corporation unless the corporation’s registration with the exchange 

includes a certification that the corporation currently is in compliance 

with the provisions of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 governing contributions and expenditures by corporations which were in 

effect with respect to elections held during 2008. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2013 

Mr. GRAYSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to prohibit 

any national securities exchange from effecting any 

transaction in a security issued by a corporation unless 

the corporation’s registration with the exchange includes 

a certification that the corporation currently is in compliance with the provisions of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 governing contributions and expenditures by corporations which were in effect with respect 

to elections held during 2008. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1115 IH

1 SECTION 1. PROHIBITING TRANSACTIONS ON NATIONAL 

2 SECURITIES EXCHANGES IN SECURITIES OF 

3 CORPORATIONS NOT CERTIFYING COMPLI4 ANCE WITH EXISTING RULES GOVERNING PO5 LITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND EXPENDI6 TURES. 

7 (a) REGISTRATION.—Section 12(b) of the Securities 

8 Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78l(b)) is amended by 

9 adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(4) If the issuer is a corporation, a statement 

11 certifying that the issuer is in compliance with sec12 tion 316 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 

13 1971 with respect to contributions and expenditures 

14 made by the corporation in the most recent quarter 

15 and year, as such section applied with respect to 

16 elections held in 2008.’’. 

17 (b) PERIODIC REPORTS.—Section 13(a) of the Secu18 rities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)) is amend19 ed— 

20 (1) at the end of paragraph (1), by striking the 

21 period and inserting a semicolon; 

22 (2) at the end of paragraph (2), by striking the 

23 period and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

24 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

25 ‘‘(3) the statement required under section 

26 12(b)(4).’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1115 IH

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this Act shall apply with respect to transactions effected 

3 on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
YOLANDA WESLEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-3133

_____________________________/

Opinion filed

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Kevin J. Carroll, Judge.

Office of Jeffrey E. Lewis, Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, and

Michael J. Titus, Assistant Regional Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sharon S. Traxler, Assistant Attorney

General, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, LEWIS, and WETHERELL, JJ., CONCUR.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned in his capacity
as an officer of Fremont Michigan InsuraCorp, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



|1. | The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                                                                                         
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Date: August 13, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Richard E. Dunning                                                                  
|                      |  |  |  | Richard E. Dunning, President and Chief Executive Officer                               
|                      |  | 
|Date: August 13, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Kevin G. Kaastra                                                                    
|                      |  |  |  | Kevin G. Kaastra, Vice President of Finance (principal financial and accounting officer)

The foregoing certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.
Exhibit 35.1



Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services,
Inc.



This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and
Servicing Agreement dated as of April 11, 2018 (the “Agreement”) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection
with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2018-1 (the “Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the
Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services,
Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the
same meanings as in the Agreement.





The undersigned certifies
that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as
follows:



| | 1. | I have
conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from May 23, 2018
through December 31, 2018, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the
best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such
period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. |                                                                            
|------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                     |                                                                            
|By:                                  | /s/ Connie Coffey                                                          
|                                     | Connie Coffey                                                              
|                                     | Executive Vice President, Corporate
Controller and Chief Accounting
Officer
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Ingrid Jackel,certify that:

1.                I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Physicians Formula Holdings, Inc.;

2.                Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4.                The registrant’sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a.                  designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.                 evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c.                  disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                The registrant’sother certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

a.                  all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b.                 any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 10,2007
| By:    | /s/ Ingrid Jackel       |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
| Name:  | Ingrid Jackel           |   |
| Title: | Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 4.11

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

                                       OF

                               MRH CAPITAL TRUST I

     This Certificate of Trust of MRH Capital Trust I (the "Trust"), dated as of
January 27, 2004 is being duly executed and filed by the undersigned, as
trustees, to form a statutory trust under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12
Del. C. ss. 3801, et seq.).

     1. Name. The name of the statutory trust formed hereby is MRH Capital
Trust I.

     2. Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of the
Trust with a principal place of business in the State of Delaware is The Bank of
New York (Delaware), White Clay Center, Route 273, Newark, DE 19711.

     3. Counterparts. This Certificate of Trust may be executed in one or more
counterparts, all of which together shall constitute one and the same
instrument.

     4. Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon filing
with the Secretary of the State of the State of Delaware.

<PAGE>

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the trustees of the Trust, have
executed this Certificate of Trust as of the date first-above written.

                              The Bank of New York,
                                as Property Trustee


                              By:       /s/ SIROJNI DINDIAL
                                  -----------------------------------------
                                    Name:      SIROJNI DINDIAL
                                    Title:     Assistant Vice President


                              The Bank of New York (Delaware),
                                as Delaware Trustee


                              By:       /s/ William T. Lewis
                                  -----------------------------------------
                                    Name:     William T. Lewis
                                    Title:    Sr. Vice President


                              Administrative Trustee

                                       /s/ Thomas G. S. Busher
                              ---------------------------------------------
                              Thomas G. S. Busher, not in his individual
                              capacity but solely as trustee of the Trust


                              Administrative Trustee

                                      /s/ Neil McConachie
                              ---------------------------------------------
                              Neil McConachie, not in his individual
                              capacity but solely as trustee of the Trust


                                        2