alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 209/31 J

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 209 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4931 July 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 209

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4931 July 2006

---

| Contents | | II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Council |
| | * | Council Decision of 14 October 2004 concerning the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants | 1 |
| Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants | 3 |
| | * | Decision No 1/2006 of the EU‐Jordan Association Council of 15 June 2006 amending Protocol 3 to the Euro‐Mediterranean Agreement, concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation | 30 |
| Protocol 3 concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation | 31 |

Contents

II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory

page

Council

*

Council Decision of 14 October 2004 concerning the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants

1

Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants

3

*

Decision No 1/2006 of the EU‐Jordan Association Council of 15 June 2006 amending Protocol 3 to the Euro‐Mediterranean Agreement, concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation

30

Protocol 3 concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation

31

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 00-1055

BOSTON EDISON COMPANY,

Petitioner,

v.

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION,

Respondent.

__________

NEW ENGLAND POWER COMPANY,

Intervenor.

ERRATA

The opinion of this Court, issued on December 1, 2000, should be

amended as follows.

On page 11, line 4 of footnote 6, replace " sub no." with " sub

nom.".

On page 19, line 9 of 2nd full paragraph, delete ", which" and

replace with "that".

On page 23, line 13 of 1st full paragraph, replace "filing" with

"filings".
# Official Journal L 97/5 Ap

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 97 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 495 April 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 97

English edition

Legislation

Volume 495 April 2006

---

| Contents | | II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Commission |
| | * | Commission Decision of 9 February 2006 amending Decision 96/335/EC establishing an inventory and a common nomenclature of ingredients employed in cosmetic products (1) | 1 |

Contents

II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory

page

Commission

*

Commission Decision of 9 February 2006 amending Decision 96/335/EC establishing an inventory and a common nomenclature of ingredients employed in cosmetic products (1)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit
      32.1








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report
      of Green Energy Holding Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'), I, Dennis
      C. Murphy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      USC
      ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004,
      that
      to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
      Dennis C. Murphy


Dennis
      C. Murphy, Chief Executive Officer


Dated:
      November 13, 2007
352 U.S. 827, 77 S. Ct. 40.

#### S. H. P. VEVELSTAD and Aurora Nickel Company, a Corporation, petitioners, v. E. Miles FLYNN.

No. 128.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 8, 1956.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Denied.
Raymond Tyrone LEWIS, Petitioner, v. William O. FARMER, Sheriff, Sumter County, Florida, et al.

No. 18-9766

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

The petition for rehearing is denied.
# C_2018260EN.01000101.xml

| 24.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/1

---

RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 6 July 2018

to the Council of the European Union on the external auditors of Banka Slovenije

(ECB/2018/18)

(2018/C 260/01)

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 27.1 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and the national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and the national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union.

| (2) | The mandate of Banka Slovenije’s current external auditors, Ernst & Young revizija, poslovno svetovanje, d.o.o., ended following the audit for the financial year 2017. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2018 onwards. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The mandate of Banka Slovenije’s current external auditors, Ernst & Young revizija, poslovno svetovanje, d.o.o., ended following the audit for the financial year 2017. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2018 onwards.

| (3) | Banka Slovenije has selected Ernst & Young revizija, poslovno svetovanje, d.o.o. as its external auditors for the financial years 2018 to 2020, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Banka Slovenije has selected Ernst & Young revizija, poslovno svetovanje, d.o.o. as its external auditors for the financial years 2018 to 2020,

HAS ADOPTED THIS RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that Ernst & Young revizija, poslovno svetovanje, d.o.o. should be appointed as the external auditors of Banka Slovenije for the financial years 2018 to 2020.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 6 July 2018.

The President of the ECB

Mario DRAGHI

---
# **Exhibit 99.1**

# ** **

# **GREENPOINTFINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES**

# **Certificationof Periodic Report**

 

I, Thomas S.Johnson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of GreenPoint Financial Corp. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1)                                  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly periodended June 30, 2002 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)                                  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated:  August 9, 2002

 

 
|   | /s/  Thomas S. Johnson                |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Thomas  S. Johnson                    |
|   | Chairman  and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | GreenPoint  Financial Corp.           |

 

----
# Official Journal L 39/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 39 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6312 February 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 39

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6312 February 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Information concerning the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the United Mexican States on certain aspects of air services | 1 |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/185 of 7 February 2020 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications ‘Pasta di Gragnano’ (PGI) | 2 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/186 of 7 February 2020 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature | 3 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Decision (EU) 2020/187 of the European Central Bank of 3 February 2020 on the implementation of the third covered bond purchase programme (ECB/2020/8) (recast) | 6 |
| | * | Decision (EU) 2020/188 of the European Central Bank of 3 February 2020 on a secondary markets public sector asset purchase programme (ECB/2020/9) | 12 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Information concerning the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the United Mexican States on certain aspects of air services

1

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/185 of 7 February 2020 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications ‘Pasta di Gragnano’ (PGI)

2

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/186 of 7 February 2020 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature

3

DECISIONS

*

Decision (EU) 2020/187 of the European Central Bank of 3 February 2020 on the implementation of the third covered bond purchase programme (ECB/2020/8) (recast)

6

*

Decision (EU) 2020/188 of the European Central Bank of 3 February 2020 on a secondary markets public sector asset purchase programme (ECB/2020/9)

12

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

________________ _________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. HAYLEE PLOTT McDONALD, Defendant - Appellant. No. 22-4051 (D.C. No. 2:21-CR-00384-DS-1) (D. Utah)

________________ _________________ ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

________________ _________________ Before BACHARACH , BRISCOE , and MORITZ , Circuit Judges.

________________ _________________ Pursuant to a plea agreement, Haylee Pl ott McDonald pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). She was sentenced to 37 months’ imprisonme nt. Ms. McDonald has filed an appeal despite the fact that her plea agreement contai ns a waiver of the right to appeal. The government has moved to enforce the appeal waiver. See United States v. Hahn , 359 F.3d 1315, 1328 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (per curiam). In evaluating a motion to en force a waiver, we consider: “(1) whether the disputed appeal falls within the scope of the waiver of appellate rights; (2) whether the defendant

* This order and judgment is not bi nding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judica ta, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consiste nt with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### September 19, 2022 Christopher M. Wolpert Clerk of Court Appellate Case: 22-4051 Document: 010110741060 Date Filed: 09/19/2022 Page: 12 knowingly and voluntarily waiv ed [her] appellate rights; and (3) whether enforcing the waiver would result in a miscarriage of justice.” Id. at 1325. In response to the motion, Ms. McDonald, through counsel, has not disputed any of these factors. She concedes that the appeal falls within the sc ope of the appeal waiver, thatshe entered into the plea agreement knowingly and voluntarily, and that enforcement of the appeal waiver would not result in a miscarriage of justice. Our independent review confirms that Ms. McDonald’s appeal waiver is enforceable. She has identified no issues she wishes to rais e on appeal that fall outside the scope of the appeal waiver. The plea ag reement clearly sets forth the appeal waiver and states that Ms. McDonald agreed to it knowingly and voluntarily, and the district court confirmed Ms. McDonald’s understanding of the plea agreement during the change of plea hearing. Moreover, we see no evid ence contradicting Ms. McDonald’s knowing and voluntary acceptance of the appeal waiv er. Finally, there is no indication that enforcing the waiver would result in a miscarriage of justice as defined in Hahn , 359 F.3d
at 1327. For the foregoing reasons, we grant the go vernment’s motion to enforce the appeal waiver and dismiss the appeal.

Entered for the Court Per Curiam Appellate Case: 22-4051 Document: 010110741060 Date Filed: 09/19/2022 Page: 2
Bradford METCALF, Petitioner v. S. KALLIS, Warden

No. 18-9846

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petition in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin* v. *District of Columbia Court of Appeals* , 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (*per curiam* ).
Exhibit
31.1





CERTIFICATIONS





I,
Dennis C. Murphy, certify that:





1.   I
have reviewed the report being filed on Form 10-QSB/A, amendment number
1 by Green Energy Holding Corp.;





2.   Based
on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by the report;





3.   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in the report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of Green Energy Holding Corp..
as of, and for, the periods presented  in the report;





4.   I
and the other certifying officer are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in
Regulation 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) for Green Energy
Holding Corp.. and have:




a.
            Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that  material
      information relating to Green Energy Holding Corp. including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
      within  those entities, particularly during
      the  period in which the periodic reports are being
      prepared;





b.
            Evaluated
      the effectiveness of Green Energy Holding Corp.'s disclosure controls and
      procedures as of a date within 90 days   prior to the
      filing date of the report ("Evaluation Date");
  and




c.
            Presented
      in the report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
      controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
      Date;





5.   I
and the other certifying officer have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, to the Green Energy Holding Corp. auditors and the audit committee
of the board of directors (or persons fulfilling


the
equivalent function):




a.
            All
      significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
      which could adversely affect Green Energy Holding
      Corp.'s  ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial
      data and have identified Green Energy Holding Corp.'s auditors any
      material    weaknesses in internal controls;
      and




b.
            Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal controls;
      and





6.   I
and the other certifying officer have indicated in the report whether or not
there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that
could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of


our most
recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Date:  
May 13, 2008


/s/ Dennis C.
Murphy


Dennis
C. Murphy, Chief Executive Officer
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1147 

To provide limitations on maritime liens on fishing permits, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2013 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To provide limitations on maritime liens on fishing permits, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Maritime Lien Reform 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON MARITIME LIENS ON FISHING PER7 MIT AND PERMIT DESCRIPTION. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter I of chapter 313 of 

9 title 46, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 

10 end the following: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1147 IH

1 ‘‘§ 31310. Limitation on maritime liens on fishing per2 mit and permit description 

3 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—This chapter— 

4 ‘‘(1) does not establish a maritime lien on a 

5 permit that— 

6 ‘‘(A) authorizes a person or use of a vessel 

7 to engage in fishing; and 

8 ‘‘(B) is issued under State or Federal law; 

9 and 

10 ‘‘(2) does not authorize any civil action to en11 force a maritime lien on such a permit. 

12 ‘‘(b) FISHING PERMIT DESCRIBED.—A fishing per13 mit— 

14 ‘‘(1) is governed solely by the State or Federal 

15 law under which it was issued; and 

16 ‘‘(2) is not included in the whole of a vessel or 

17 as an appurtenance or intangible of a vessel for any 

18 purpose. 

19 ‘‘(c) LIMITATION ON STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION.— 

20 Nothing in subsections (a) and (b) shall be construed as 

21 imposing any limitation upon the authority of the Sec22 retary of Commerce to modify, suspend, revoke, or sanc23 tion any Federal fishery permit issued by the Secretary 

24 of Commerce or to bring a civil action to enforce such 

25 modification, suspension, revocation, or sanction.’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1147 IH

1 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

2 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting 

3 after the item relating to section 31309 the following: 

‘‘31310. Limitation on maritime liens on fishing permit and permit description.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Quintin Irving BROWN, Petitioner, v. VIRGINIA.

No. 18-9447

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

The petition for rehearing is denied.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Highland Homes – Houston, LLC

Appellate case number: 01-21-00585-CV

Trial court case number: 20-DCV-276771

Trial court: 400th District Court of Fort Bend County

Real party in interest, Ursula McLendon, has filed an Unopposed Motion to Extend Time 

to File Response to Relator’s Writ of Mandamus. Real party in interest’s motion is granted. 

Real party in interest’s response brief, if any, is due December 15, 2021.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___________/s/ Julie Countiss__________

Acting individually 

Date: November 23, 2021