alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q REPORT  OF  REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC.  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  (CHAPTER 63, TITLE 18 U.S.C. SS.SS. 1350(a) AND (b))

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby
certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
May 5, 2008

/s/STEVEN J. JANUSEKSteven J. Janusek, Chief Financial Officer


The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350(a) and (b)), is not
a part of the Form 10-Q to which it refers and is, to the extent permitted by law, provided by the above signatory to the extent of his knowledge.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1283 

To amend the Small Business Act to provide for grants to small business 

development centers, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 20, 2013 

Mr. BRALEY of Iowa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To amend the Small Business Act to provide for grants 

to small business development centers, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Main Street Stabiliza5 tion Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. IN GENERAL. 

7 Section 21 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

8 648), is amended by adding at the end the following new 

9 subsection: 

10 ‘‘(o) MAIN STREET STABILIZATION.— 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1283 IH

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Administration shall 

2 establish a grant program for small business devel3 opment centers in accordance with this subsection. 

4 To be eligible for the program, a small business de5 velopment center must be in good standing and com6 ply with the other requirements of this section. 

7 Funds made available through the program shall be 

8 used to— 

9 ‘‘(A) develop business advisory capacity to 

10 provide expert consulting and education to as11 sist small businesses and to, in areas of high 

12 demand, shorten the response time of small 

13 business development centers, and, in rural 

14 areas, support added outreach in remote com15 munities; 

16 ‘‘(B) develop a portfolio of online survival 

17 and growth tools and resources that struggling 

18 small business concerns can utilize through the 

19 Internet; 

20 ‘‘(C) deploy additional resources to help 

21 specific industry sectors with a high presence of 

22 small business concerns, which shall be targeted 

23 toward clusters of small businesses with similar 

24 needs and build upon best practices from earlier 

25 assistance; and 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1283 IH

1 ‘‘(D) develop a formal listing of financing 

2 options for small business capital access. 

3 ‘‘(2) AWARD SIZE LIMIT.—The Administration 

4 may not award an entity more than $250,000 in 

5 grant funds under this subsection. 

6 ‘‘(3) AUTHORITY.—Subject to amounts ap7 proved in advance in appropriations Acts and sepa8 rate from amounts approved to carry out the pro9 gram established in subsection (a)(1), the Adminis10 tration may make grants or enter into cooperative 

11 agreements to carry out this subsection. 

12 ‘‘(4) AUTHORIZATION.—There is authorized to 

13 be appropriated not more than $2,500,000 for the 

14 purposes of carrying out this subsection for each of 

15 the fiscal years 2014 and 2015.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
II 

Calendar No. 643 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1241 

[Report No. 113–303] 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 9, 2013 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

DECEMBER 10, 2014 

Reported by Ms. LANDRIEU, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To facilitate a land exchange involving certain National Forest System lands in the Inyo National Forest, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SPECIAL RULES FOR INYO NATIONAL FOREST 

4 LAND EXCHANGE. 

5 (a) AUTHORITY TO ACCEPT LANDS OUTSIDE

6 BOUNDARIES OF INYO NATIONAL FOREST.—In any land 

7 exchange involving the conveyance of certain National 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1241 RS

1 Forest System land located within the boundaries of Inyo 

2 National Forest in California, as shown on the map titled 

3 ‘‘Federal Parcel’’ and dated June 2011, the Secretary of 

4 Agriculture may accept for acquisition in the exchange 

5 certain non-Federal lands in California lying outside the 

6 boundaries of Inyo National Forest, as shown on the maps 

7 titled ‘‘DWP Parcel – Interagency Visitor Center Parcel’’ 

8 and ‘‘DWP Parcel – Town of Bishop Parcel’’ and dated 

9 June 2011, if the Secretary determines that acquisition 

10 of the non-Federal lands is desirable for National Forest 

11 System purposes. 

12 (b) CASH EQUALIZATION PAYMENT; USE.—In an ex13 change described in subsection (a), the Secretary of Agri14 culture may accept a cash equalization payment in excess 

15 of 25 percent. Any such cash equalization payment shall 

16 be deposited into the account in the Treasury of the 

17 United States established by Public Law 90–171 (com18 monly known as the Sisk Act; 16 U.S.C. 484a) and shall 

19 be made available to the Secretary for the acquisition of 

20 land for addition to the National Forest System. 

21 (c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this sec22 tion shall be construed to grant the Secretary of Agri23 culture new land exchange authority. This section modifies 

24 the use of land exchange authorities already available to 

25 the Secretary as of the date of the enactment of this Act. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 643 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1241 

[Report No. 113–303] 

AN ACT 

To facilitate a land exchange involving certain NaForest, and for other purposes. tional Forest System lands in the Inyo National 

DECEMBER 10, 2014 

Reported without amendment 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

April 13, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129220 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

DENNIS A. WOLFE, and all others similarly Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, situated, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 129220 

 COA: 251076 

Wayne CC: 01-129296-CZ

WAYNE-WESTLAND COMMUNITY 

SCHOOLS, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 23, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal. 

p0406 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 13, 2006 

Clerk
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #17487 and #17488; NEW MEXICO Disaster Number NM-00081]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of New Mexico (FEMA-4652-DR), dated 06/08/2022.
                        ( print page 36568) *Incident:*
                         Wildfires and Straight-line Winds. *Incident Period:*
                         04/05/2022 and continuing.
 DATES: Issued on 06/08/2022. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         08/08/2022. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         03/08/2023.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 06/08/2022, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Colfax, Mora, San Miguel. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875*For Economic Injury:*Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17487 5 and for economic injury is 17488 0. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Joshua Barnes, Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2022-13032 Filed 6-16-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
Order filed December 3, 2015

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

__________

No. 11-15-00248-CV

__________

TNC ENERGY, LLC; TOMMY WEDER, JR.; AND TOMMY 

WEDER, SR., Appellants

V.

CRESCENT SUPPLY COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 350th District Court

Taylor County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 10328-D

O R D E R

TNC Energy, LLC; Tommy Weder, Jr.; and Tommy Weder, Sr. timely filed 

a restricted appeal from a final default judgment signed by the trial judge on 

April 10, 2015. Appellants have now filed in this court a notice of bankruptcy. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.1. The notice indicates that an involuntary petition was filed 

under Chapter 7 of the United States Bankruptcy Code against TNC Energy, LLC
2

by some of TNC’s creditors. The notice complies with TEX. R. APP. P. 8.1.

Therefore, pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2, we abate this appeal. The parties are

requested to inform this court of the resolution of the bankruptcy proceedings or 

any other event that would allow this appeal to be reinstated. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 8.3. 

This appeal is abated. 

PER CURIAM

December 3, 2015

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.
Braun Nathan THOMPSON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7078

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
SMITH BARNEY INTERMEDIATE MUNICIPAL FUND, INC.
SMITH BARNEY MUNICIPAL FUND, INC.
(the "Funds")

Supplement dated February 25, 1998 to 
Prospectuses dated
April 30, 1997

	The Funds may invest in zero coupon bonds.  
A zero coupon bond pays no interest in cash to 
its holder during its life, although interest is 
accrued during that period.  Its value to an 
investor consists of the difference between its 
face value at the time of maturity and the price 
for which it was acquired, which is generally an 
amount significantly less than its face value 
(sometimes referred to as a "deep discount" 
price).  Because such securities usually trade 
at a deep discount, they will be subject to 
greater fluctuations of market value in response 
to changing interest rates than debt obligations 
of comparable maturities which make periodic 
distributions of interest.  On the other hand, 
because there are no periodic interest payments 
to be reinvested prior to maturity, zero coupon 
securities eliminate the reinvestment risk and 
lock in a rate of return to maturity. 

FD 01413
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6555 

BRENT A. ROBINSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; RICK JACKSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior

District Judge. (3:06-cv-000132)

Submitted: May 18, 2006 Decided: June 1, 2006

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brent A. Robinson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Brent A. Robinson appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his civil action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Robinson v. North Carolina, No. 3:06-cv-000132

(W.D.N.C. Mar. 23, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Shevaun E. BROWNE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5387

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018388EN.01001501.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 26.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 388/15 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9161 — Brookfield/M Finance Capital/ECLA Paris Massy-Palaiseau Companies)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 388/14)

1.

On 19 October 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018388EN.01001501-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (‘Brookfield’, Canada) |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | M Finance Capital SAS (France) |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | ECLA Paris Massy-Palaiseau Companies (France). |

Brookfield acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of M Finance Capital SAS and ECLA Paris Massy-Palaiseau Companies.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Brookfield: global asset manager with a focus on property, renewable power, infrastructure and private equity,

—   for M Finance Capital SAS: active in real estate development, student residences management and apartment-hotels management in France and Belgium,

—   for ECLA Paris Massy-Palaiseau Companies: owner of one residency located in France and subcontracting the operation of that property.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018388EN.01001501-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9161 — Brookfield/M Finance Capital/ECLA Paris Massy-Palaiseau Companies

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018388EN.01001501-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018388EN.01001501-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
EXHIBIT 31

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David J. Cutler, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Atomic Paintball, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as  defined  in  Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for the
registrant and I have:

    a)     designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure that
           material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,  including  its
           consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
           entities,  particularly  during the  period in which  this  quarterly
           report is being prepared;

    b)     evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
           and  procedures  as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date
           of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

    c)     presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
           the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of
           the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

    a)     all  significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
           controls which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
           record,  process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
           identified for the registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
           internal controls; and

    b)     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
           employees who have a  significant role in  the  registrant's internal
           controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this report
whether or not there were significant  changes in internal  controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: November 23, 2009


By:      /s/ David J. Cutler
         ----------------------------------
         David J. Cutler
         Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
10.1


 


 


STRAIGHT NOTE


 


 


	
  $150,000

  	
  South El Monte, California

  	
  December 3, 2003

  



 


 


For value received, Lee Pharmaceuticals promises to
pay Leah DiSalvo or order, at South El Monte, California the sum of ONE HUNDRED
FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS, with interest from December 3, 2003, on unpaid
principal at the rate of twenty-four (24) percent for a ninety (90) day
period.  Principal plus accrued interest
will be due and payable on March 1, 2004. 
Interest shall be calculated on the basis of the unpaid principal balance
daily, based on a 365-day year, actual day month.  Principal and interest shall be payable in lawful money of the
United States.  If action were
instituted on this note, I promise to pay such sum as the Court may fix as
attorney’s fees.  This note is
unsecured.


 


 


	
  DECEMBER 1, 2003

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  RONALD G. LEE

  	
   

  
	
  Date

  	
   

  	
  Lee Pharmaceuticals - Ronald G. Lee

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  DECEMBER 1, 2003

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  MICHAEL L. AGRESTI

  	
   

  
	
  Date

  	
   

  	
  Lee Pharmaceuticals - Michael L. Agresti