alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Description of Compensatory Arrangements Between Registrant & Non Employee Direc



 Exhibit 10.18  
  
 DESCRIPTION OF COMPENSATORY ARRANGEMENTS 
 BETWEEN REGISTRANT AND DIRECTORS 
  
 Each director (other than the Chairman of the Board) who is not a Company employee is paid an annual retainer fee of $30,000. Each non-employee director
is also paid $2,000 for each Board meeting attended in person, $1,000 for each Board meeting attended by telephone and $1,000 for each Board committee meeting attended in person or by telephone. The director who chairs the Audit Committee of the
Board is paid an additional annual retainer fee of $15,000. The directors who chair the Compensation and the Nominating and Governance Committees of the Board are each paid an additional annual retainer fee of $5,000. 
  
 Mr. Lauer, Chairman of the Board, stepped down as Chief Executive Officer on
December 31, 2003. He will continue to be an employee of the Company until his planned retirement as an employee on June 30, 2004. Until that date, he will receive a base salary at an annual rate of $200,000, will be eligible to continue to
participate in benefit plans that are available generally to other employees, will be eligible to continue to participate in the Varian, Inc. Supplemental Retirement Plan, will continue to be provided with a Company-leased automobile, and will be
reimbursed for financial planning and tax services, all to the same extent while he served as Chief Executive Officer. Effective July 1, 2004, following Mr. Lauer’s retirement as an employee, Mr. Lauer will be paid an annual retainer fee of
$120,000 (in lieu of any other annual retainer, committee chair or attendance fees) as the non-employee Chairman of the Board, will no longer receive the benefits and perquisites that he received as an officer of the Company, and will no longer
participate in benefit plans available only to employees of the Company. 
  
 Directors may elect to receive, in lieu of all or a portion of the foregoing fees, shares of the Company’s common stock based on the fair market value of the stock on the date the fees would have been paid. In
addition, under the Company’s Omnibus Stock Plan, each director who is not a Company employee receives upon initial appointment or election to the Board a nonqualified stock option to acquire 10,000 shares of the Company’s common stock,
and receives annually thereafter a nonqualified stock option to acquire 5,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. Pursuant to this provision of the Omnibus Stock Plan, Mr. Lauer will receive a nonqualified stock option to acquire 10,000
shares of common stock on July 1, 2004, the date he becomes a non-employee director; he will receive annually thereafter a nonqualified stock option to acquire 5,000 shares of common stock. All such stock options are granted with an exercise price
equal to the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the grant date, are vested and exercisable beginning on the grant date and have a ten-year term. 
  
 Each director is reimbursed for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses that such director and his or her spouse incurs
attending Board meetings and functions.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 120 (Thursday, June 23, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 37512]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13367]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreements Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of filing of the following 
agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may 
submit comments, relevant information, or documents regarding the 
agreements to the Secretary by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b7e4d2d4c5d2c3d6c5cef7d1dad499d0d8c1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="88dbedebfaedfce9faf1c8eee5eba6efe7fe">[email protected]</span></a>, or by mail, 
Federal Maritime Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, Washington, DC 
20573. Comments will be most helpful to the Commission if received 
within 12 days of the date this notice appears in the Federal Register, 
and the Commission requests that comments be submitted within 7 days on 
agreements that request expedited review. Copies of agreements are 
available through the Commission's website (www.fmc.gov) or by 
contacting the Office of Agreements at (202)-523-5793 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9febedfefbfafef1fef3e6ecf6ecdff9f2fcb1f8f0e9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="700402111415111e111c0903190330161d135e171f06">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Agreement No.: 201288-005.
    Agreement Name: Digital Container Shipping Association Agreement.
    Parties: CMA CGM S.A.; Evergreen Marine Corporation; Hapag-Lloyd 
AG; Hyundai Merchant Marine Co., Ltd.; Maersk A/S; Mediterranean 
Shipping Company S.A.; Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd.; Yang Ming 
Marine Transport Corporation; and Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
    Filing Party: Wayne Rohde; Cozen O'Connor.
    Synopsis: The amendment authorizes the parties to develop and offer 
products and services in addition to standards. It also revises some of 
the governance procedures for the association and restates the 
Agreement.
    Proposed Effective Date: 7/31/2022.
    Location: https://www2.fmc.gov/FMC.Agreements.Web/Public/AgreementHistory/21328.

    Dated: June 16, 2022.
William Cody,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-13367 Filed 6-22-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6703-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2013 of Dewmar International BMC, Inc.. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.

 

Very truly yours,

 

 

| /s/ Marco Moran

 

Marco Moran

 

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

**August 19, 2013**

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Marco Moran

 

Marco Moran

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

**August 19, 2013**

 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Dewmar International BMC, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Report of Independent Accountants

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Salomon Brothers 2008 Worldwide Dollar Government Term Trust Inc


In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements
of the Salomon Brothers 2008 Worldwide Dollar Government Term
Trust Inc, (hereafter referred to as the "Trust") for the year
ended July 31, 2000 we considered its internal control, including
control activities for safeguarding securities, in order to
determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing
our opinion on the financial statements and to comply with the
requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on internal
control.

The management of the Trust is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.  Those controls include the safeguarding
of assets against unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or
fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any
evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to
the risk that it may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in internal control that might be material
weaknesses under standards established by the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness is a
condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the
internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low
level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in
amounts that would be material in relation to the financial
statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a
timely period by employees in the normal course of performing
their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters involving
internal control and its operation, including controls for
safeguarding securities, that we consider to be material
weaknesses as defined above as of July 31, 2000.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management and the Board of Directors of the Trust and the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


September 21, 2000
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.19



DESCRIPTION OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS FOR INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS


Director Compensation Structure
Each of our independent directors is expected to receive:
		
	•
	An annual cash retainer of $100,000, paid in four, equal installments following each quarter of service. 


		
	•
	If a director attends more than twenty (20) Board and Board committee meetings in aggregate during a calendar year, a cash meeting fee of $2,000 for each Board and committee meeting attended during such year in excess of such threshold, paid in aggregate following completion of such year. 


		
	•
	An annual equity award with a target award value of $175,000.


		
	•
	Reimbursement for Envista-related out-of-pocket expenses, including travel expenses. 


In addition, the Board chair is expected to receive an annual cash retainer of $62,500 and an annual equity award with a target value of $62,500, the chair of the Audit Committee is expected to receive an annual cash retainer of $20,000, the chair of the Compensation Committee an annual cash retainer of $15,000, and the Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee an annual retainer of $10,000, with all cash retainers paid in four, equal installments following each quarter of service.
Each of the directors designated by Danaher for nomination to our Board pursuant to Danaher’s rights under the separation agreement is expected to receive from Danaher (not Envista) a one-time cash payment for service on the Board between the date of this offering and the date Danaher no longer controls a majority of the total voting power of Envista’s outstanding shares with respect to the election of directors (the “Disposition Date”).  The cash payment will be based on an annual rate of $275,000 and will be pro-rated as necessary based on the number of months the director serves on the Envista Board between the date of this offering and Disposition Date (with any partial month counting as a full month).  This cash payment will be paid in a lump sum between the Disposition Date and the date that is thirty (30) days following the Disposition Date. 
Mr. Aghdaei will receive no additional compensation (other than his compensation as President and CEO) for his service on the Envista Board.
Exhibit
32.1  Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Virgin Media Inc. and
Virgin Media Investment Holdings Limited (the Registrants) for the three
months ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Neil A. Berkett, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Registrants, and Robert Gale, as Principal Financial
Officer of the Registrants, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of his knowledge, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and  (2)The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Registrants.   Date:
  August 7, 2009
  By:
  /s/ NEIL A.
  BERKETTName:
  Neil A.
  BerkettTitle:
  Chief Executive OfficerDate:
  August 7, 2009
  By:
  /s/ ROBERT
  GALEName:
  Robert GaleTitle:
  Principal Financial Officer  A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrants and will be
retained by the Registrants and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.  This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrants for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOT A

2020 ND 3 10

NBS Consulting, Inc. dba On Point

M anagement and Whitney Racine, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.
Pe irce Harris aka Pierce Harris, Defendant and Appellant

and
All Other Occupants, Defendants

No. 20200203

Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, North Central Judicial District, the Honorable Gary H. Lee , Judge.

AFFIRMED

.
Per Curiam.

Remington M. Kostenko and Dean A. Frantsvog, Minot, ND

, for plaintiff and appellee ; submitted o n brief

. Pierce Harris, self

- represented, Minot, ND , defendant and appellant ; submitted on brief

.1 NBS Consulting v. Harris No. 20200203

Per Curiam

. [¶1] Pierce Harris appealed from an order and a judgment evicting him from a property in Minot. Harris argues he was wrongfully evicted and improperly served. Harris failed to provide a transcr ipt, which leaves us with little record to review. “If the record on appeal does not allow a meaningful and intelligent review of the alleged error, we decline to review it.” City of West Fargo v. Olson

, 2007 ND 48, ¶ 1, 734 N.W.2d 342 (quoting State v. Stockert , 2004 ND 146, ¶

1 3, 684 N.W.2d 605). Harris failed to provide us the opportunity to review his claims in a meaningful and intelligent manner. Therefore, we summarily affirm the district court under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C. J

. Gerald W. VandeWall e Daniel J. Crother s Lisa Fair McEver s Jerod E. Tuft e
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellant,

v.

ASHTON NICOLE LEWIS

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 3048

[ November 7, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County ; Lawrence Mirman , Judge; L.T. Case No.

432018CF000161A

.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah Koenig, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and David John McPherrin,

Assistant Publ ic Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C IKLIN
, G ERBER and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 2 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 2

  Expressing the sense of Congress that a commemorative postage stamp 
     should be issued in honor of George Thomas ``Mickey'' Leland.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2013

 Ms. Jackson Lee submitted the following concurrent resolution; which 
    was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of Congress that a commemorative postage stamp 
     should be issued in honor of George Thomas ``Mickey'' Leland.

Whereas George Thomas Leland (affectionately known as ``Mickey''), in the course 
        of his 6 terms as a member of the House of Representatives from the 
        State of Texas, emerged as a national spokesman regarding the problem of 
        hunger in the United States and throughout the world;
Whereas Mickey Leland was instrumental in establishing the Select Committee on 
        Hunger and served as chairman of that committee until the time of his 
        death;
Whereas in the capacity of chairman of the Select Committee on Hunger, Mickey 
        Leland helped generate public awareness of the complex issues relating 
        to the alleviation of hunger and demonstrated strong personal moral 
        leadership;
Whereas it was his leadership that guided the Hunger Prevention Act of 1988, 
        which required the Secretary of Agriculture not only to distribute 
        surplus food, but also to purchase additional food for future 
        distributions to needy households;
Whereas Mickey Leland brought together entertainment personalities, religious 
        leaders, and private volunteer agencies to generate public support for 
        the African Famine Relief and Recovery Act of 1985, which provided 
        $800,000,000 in food and humanitarian relief supplies;
Whereas the various initiatives brought forth by Mickey Leland to eradicate 
        world hunger undoubtedly saved thousands of lives;
Whereas 2007 marks the 18th anniversary of Mickey Leland's death;
Whereas Mickey Leland died as he lived: on a mission to make a positive 
        difference in this world; and
Whereas commemorative postage stamps have been commissioned to honor other great 
        leaders in American history: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) a commemorative postage stamp should be issued in honor 
        of George Thomas ``Mickey'' Leland; and
            (2) the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend 
        to the Postmaster General that such a stamp be issued.
                                 <all>
```
Smith Barney Funds, Inc.
388 Greenwich Street, New York, NY  10013


October 17, 1997

***SECOND REQUEST***
YOUR RESPONSE IS VITAL


Dear Shareholder:

	We have not yet received your proxy for the Special Meeting of 
Shareholders originally scheduled for October 17, 1997.  Due to a lack 
of sufficient votes for a quorum, the Meeting is being adjourned.  
Another proxy ballot is enclosed.  PLEASE VOTE AND RETURN THE BALLOT 
TODAY!

	The Special Meeting was called because the Board of Directors of 
Smith Barney Funds, Inc. -- Income Return Account Portfolio recommended 
that shareholders approve the proposal for the Cash Portfolio of Smith 
Barney Money Funds, Inc. to acquire all or substantially all of the 
assets and liabilities of the Income Return Account Portfolio.  A proxy 
statement was recently sent to you that describes this proposal in 
greater detail.

	You may think your vote is insignificant, but every vote is 
extremely important.  We must continue sending requests to vote until a 
majority of the shares are represented.  Additional mailings are 
expensive.

	You may utilize any of the following means to return your signed 
proxy ballot:  (i) Federal Express courier, (ii) regular mail, or (iii) 
fax transmission.  In order to facilitate the voting process, without 
cost to you, we are enclosing (i) a return Federal Express mailer (with 
Smith Barney's account number indicated on the airbill), (ii) a postage-
paid return envelope, and (iii) a fax cover page whereby you can fax 
your vote to (212) 816-5666.

	Because time is short, we would appreciate your immediate action 
so your vote will be counted in time for the adjourned meeting.  YOUR 
RESPONSE IS VITAL to the successful conclusion of this solicitation 
effort.  If you have any questions, please contact your Financial 
Consultant.

	Your participation is extremely important no matter how few shares 
you own.

	Sincerely,


	Heath B. McLendon
	Chairman, on behalf of the Board of Directors
Cathy L. TOOLE, Petitioner v. Robert WILKIE, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, et al.;

No. 19-5047

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
Raymont WRIGHT, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5643

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
SMITH BARNEY APPRECIATION FUND INC.

Supplement Dated June 19, 1998 to 
Prospectus Dated April 30, 1998


	The following information supplements the information in the Prospectus 
under "Investment Objectives and Management Policies"

	
Options on Securities.  The Fund may write (sell) covered put and call 
options on securities ("Options") and purchase put and call Options 
that are traded on foreign or U.S. securities exchanges and over the 
counter.  The Fund will write such Options for the purpose of increasing 
its return and/or protecting the value of its portfolio. In particular, 
where the Fund writes an Option that expires unexercised or is closed 
out by the Fund at a profit, it will retain the premium paid for the 
Option, which will increase its gross income and will offset in part the 
reduced value of a portfolio security in connection with which the 
Option may have been written or the increased cost of portfolio 
securities to be acquired.  However, the writing of Options constitutes 
only a partial hedge, up to the amount of the premium, less any 
transaction costs.  In contrast, if the price of the security underlying 
the Option moves adversely to the Fund's position, the Option may be 
exercised and the Fund will be required to purchase or sell the security 
at a disadvantageous price, resulting in losses that may only be 
partially offset by the amount of the premium.  The Fund may also write 
combinations of put and call Options on the same security, known as 
"straddles."  Such transactions generate additional premium income but 
also present increased risk.  

	The Fund may purchase put and call Options in anticipation of 
declines in the value of portfolio securities or increases in the value 
of securities to be acquired.  In the event that the expected changes 
occur, the Fund may be able to offset the resulting adverse effect on 
its portfolio, in whole or in part, through the Options purchased.  The 
risk assumed by the Fund in connection with such transactions is limited 
to the amount of the premium and related transaction costs associated 
with the Option, although the Fund may be required to forfeit such 
amounts in the event that the prices of securities underlying the 
Options do not move in the direction or to the extent anticipated.  The 
Fund can invest up to 5% of its total assets in put and call options on 
securities.


FD