alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

OCT 7 1997

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

LEE WEBB,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

PRISON HEALTH SERVICES;

BRUCE WELLS, M.D.,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 97-3146

(D.C. No. 94-CV-3064-GTV)

(Kansas)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, PORFILIO and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Plaintiff Lee Webb appeals from the district court’s summary judgment in
1We construe plaintiff’s “Amended and Supplemental Pleadings” as a

motion to supplement the record on appeal and grant it.

-2-

favor of defendants on plaintiff’s claim that defendants violated his rights under

the Eighth Amendment to be free from cruel and unusual punishment.1 We have

reviewed the record in light of plaintiff’s claims, and we agree with the district

court that plaintiff has failed to establish the requisite deliberate indifference to

his serious medical needs required to support a constitutional violation.

We AFFIRM the judgment of the district court substantially for the

reasons given by the court in its Memorandum and order dated May 6, 1997.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Stephanie K. Seymour

Chief Judge
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT LATANYA C R

AM ER , Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. S. DIC KINSON, Offic e r; PATRIC IA A. JOHNSON, Nurse Pra c titione r, De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 13-15865 D.C . No. 1:08-c v-00375-AW IGSA M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Ea ste rn Distric t of C a lifornia Anthony W . Ishii, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

Nove m b e r 18, 2014 ** B e fore : LEAVY, FISHER , a nd N.R . SM ITH, C irc uit Judge s. C a lifornia sta te prisone r Lata

ny a C ram e r a ppe a l s pro se from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt dismi ssing he r 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c tion a lle ging tha t de fe nda nts viola te d he r Fourth a

nd Eighth Ame ndm e nt rights when the y subje c te d he r to a

n 

# F IL ED DEC 04 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).a lle ge dly

ille ga l digita l c av i ty

se arc h. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie wde novo a distric t c ourt’ s dismissa l on theba sis of the doc trine of re s judic ata . Ste w art v . U.S. Banc orp , 297 F.3d 953, 956 (9th C ir. 2002). W e a ffirm . The distric t c ourt prope rly dism isse d C ram e r’ s a c tion a s ba rre d by re s judic ata be c a use C ram e r ra ise d ide ntic a l c la im s a ga inst the se de fe nda nts in a prior fe de ra l a c tion tha

t wa s a djudic ate d on the m e rits. Se e C rame r v . Dic k

inson e t al ., No. 1:08-c v -00723-C RB (PR ); Fe d. R . C iv. P. 41(b) (dismissa l for fa ilure to prose c ute or c om

ply with a c ourt orde r “ ope ra te s a s a n a djudic ation on the m e rits” ); se e also Stew art , 297 F.3d a t 956 (de s c ribing e le m e nts of re s judic ata ). W e do not c onside r C ram e r’ s re que sts to produc e pa pe rwork re lating to the De c e m b e r 19, 2005 inc ide nt be c a use the y we re ra ise d for the first tim e in he r R e ply B rie f. Se e Smith v . Marsh , 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th C ir. 1999). The C le rk is dire c te d

to file the R e ply

B rie f lodge d on Oc tobe r 21, 2013. AFFIRM E D .

2 1 3 - 1 5 8 6 5
May 7, 1997




VIA EDGAR


Securities and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20549


ATTN.:		Office of Filings, Information and Consumer Services


RE:		Smith Barney Telecommunications Trust (the "Trust")
		File Nos. 2-86519 and 811-3763

Gentlemen:

	Pursuant to Rule 497(j) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, 
please accept this letter as certification that the prospectus and statement 
of additional information of the Fund do not differ from those contained in 
Post-Effective Amendment No. 21 (the "Amendment") to the Fund's Registration 
Statement on Form N-1A.  This Amendment was filed electronically on April 
29, 1997, as Accession Number:0000091155-97-000226 and became effective 
on April 30, 1997.


	Any comments on this filing should be directed to the undersigned at 
(212) 816-6393.  Please return an electronic transmittal as evidence of your 
receipt of this filing.

					Very truly yours,

					SMITH BARNEY TELECOMMUNICATIONS 			
			TRUST	
						


					/s/ Robert Vegliante
					Robert Vegliante						
				Vice President & Associate General Counsel
EXHIBIT 32.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Financial Tax Credit Fund VIII (the “Fund”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.








/s/Kenneth J. Cutillo


Kenneth J. Cutillo


Principal Executive Officer and


Principal Financial Officer


Arch Street VIII, Inc., as


General Partner of


Arch Street VIII Limited Partnership, as


General Partner of


Boston Financial Tax Credit Fund VIII,


A Limited Partnership








Date:  February 14, 2011








A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Billy J. GRIFFIN, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6348

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Solomon UPSHAW, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19M76

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Motion for leave to proceed as a veteran denied.
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Daniel RIVERA, et al.

No. 18-1592

Supreme Court of the United States.

Nov. 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 90 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 90

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
for a ceremony as part of the commemoration of the days of remembrance 
                      of victims of the Holocaust.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 2014

    Mr. Meehan (for himself, Mr. Grimm, Mr. Waxman, and Mr. Israel) 
 submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
for a ceremony as part of the commemoration of the days of remembrance 
                      of victims of the Holocaust.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR HOLOCAUST DAYS OF REMEMBRANCE 
              CEREMONY.

    Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center is authorized to be 
used on April 30, 2014, for a ceremony as part of the commemoration of 
the days of remembrance of victims of the Holocaust. Physical 
preparations for the conduct of the ceremony shall be carried out in 
accordance with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol.
                                 <all>
```
**Important legal notice**

*|*

# 52006AP0531

**European Parliament decision on the nomination of Nadezhda Sandolova as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C6-0411/2006 - 2006/0811(CNS))***Official Journal 317 E , 23/12/2006 P. 0059 - 0060*

20061223

P6_TA(2006)0531

Nomination of the Bulgarian Member of the Court of Auditors

European Parliament decision on the nomination of Nadezhda Sandolova as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C6-0411/2006 — 2006/0811(CNS))

The European Parliament,

- having regard to Article 247(3) of the EC Treaty and Article 160b(3) of the Euratom Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0411/2006),

- whereas at its meeting of 28 November 2006 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council's nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors, and considered the nominee's qualifications in the light of the criteria laid down by Articles 247(2) of the EC Treaty and 160b(2) of the Euratom Treaty,

- having regard to Rule 101 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A6-0442/2006);

1. Delivers a favourable opinion on the nomination of Nadezhda Sandolova as a Member of the Court of Auditors;

2. Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Communities and the audit offices of the Member States.

--------------------------------------------------
Ronald D. VETETO, Petitioner, v. Gregory O. GRIFFIN, Judge, Circuit Court of Alabama, Montgomery County, et al.

No. 19-6516

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and the petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
IN RE Arthur Edward EZOR, Petitioner

No. 19-449

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 12, 2019

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Christopher Coffey, Vice President of Synchrony Card Funding LLC,certify that:

 

1.       I have reviewed this reporton Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of SynchronyCard Issuance Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.       Based on my knowledge,the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report;

 

3.       Based on my knowledge,all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this reportis included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.       Based on my knowledge andthe servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.       All of the reports on assessmentof compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB andExchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Anymaterial instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on informationprovided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware, Citibank, N.A. and Citicorp Trust Delaware, NationalAssociation.
# C_2017180EN.01003701.xml

| 8.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/37

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2017/C 180/08)

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Bioethanol | United States of America | Anti-dumping duty | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 157/2013 of 18 February 2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of bioethanol originating in the United States of America (OJ L 49, 22.2.2013, p. 10) | 23.2.2018 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Bioethanol

United States of America

Anti-dumping duty

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 157/2013 of 18 February 2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of bioethanol originating in the United States of America (OJ L 49, 22.2.2013, p. 10)

23.2.2018

---

(1)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

1

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1228 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 386
113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1228

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 27, 2014

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                              May 21, 2014

               Reported by Mr. Carper, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 123 South 9<SUP>th</SUP> Street in De Pere, Wisconsin, as the 
           ``Corporal Justin D. Ross Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CORPORAL JUSTIN D. ROSS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 123 South 9<SUP>th</SUP> Street in De Pere, Wisconsin, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Corporal Justin D. Ross Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Corporal 
Justin D. Ross Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 386

113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1228

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 123 South 9<SUP>th</SUP> Street in De Pere, Wisconsin, as the 
           ``Corporal Justin D. Ross Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 21, 2014

                       Reported without amendment
```
SMITH BARNEY GROWTH OPPORTUNITY FUND
(the "Fund")

Supplement dated July 28, 1997 to 
Prospectus dated April 30, 1997


Effective August 1, 1997, Dennis A. Johnson, CFA, a Managing 
Director of Smith Barney Inc. and President and Chief Investment 
Officer of Peachtree Asset Management ("Peachtree"), a division of 
Smith Barney Mutual Funds Management Inc., the Fund's investment 
adviser and administrator, will be responsible for managing the 
day to day investment operations of the Fund, including the making 
of investment decisions.  Prior to joining Peachtree, Mr. Johnson 
was Vice President of Trusco Capital.

In attempting to achieve the Fund's investment objective of 
capital appreciation, Mr. Johnson will use a disciplined approach 
to identify the equity securities of companies having prospects of 
strong, sustainable earnings growth and that are believed to 
afford attractive opportunities for stock priced appreciation.  
This disciplined approach involves computer-aided, quantitative 
analysis supported by fundamental research.  Mr. Johnson selects 
stocks for the Fund's portfolio by sorting a universe of 1500 
stocks into deciles based on earnings and other valuation 
characteristics.  Those stocks sorted into the top two deciles are 
further analyzed quantitatively and fundamentally to determine if 
they are attractive investments.  In addition to determining which 
stocks may be attractive investments for the Fund, this analysis 
is used to determine if a particular stock held in the Fund's 
portfolio continues to be an attractive investment and stocks 
appearing in the bottom two deciles are sold.  Although the Fund 
may invest in the stocks of smaller capitalized companies, the 
Fund's assets will be invested primarily in the stock of mid- and 
larger-capitalized companies.


FD 01315
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                November 14, 2007 | By:    | /s/                David                A. Gillespie                                               |
|----------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   |   | David                A. Gillespie                                                                  |
|                                   |   | President                and Chief Executive Officer                                               |
|                                   |   | (Principal                executive and principal financial                officer of the Company) |

----
## 2007 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

3-27-2007 

# L aur e n W . v . D eF l a mini s
P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 05-3774

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . v i l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2007

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2007 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. F or mor e infor m at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min
. C a rl s on@l a

w . v i l l a no va . e du

. 

## Re c omme nde d C it at ion

" L aur e n W . v . D eFl a mini s " (2007). 2007 D e cisio n s . P ape r 1375. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . v i l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2007/1375

## PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Nos. 05-3774, 05-4008, 05-4009
LAUREN W., BY AND THROUGH HER PARENTS, JEAN AND JAMES W.; JEAN W.; JAMES W., ON THEIR OWN BEHALF, Appellants in No. 05-3774

v. JOHN A. DEFLAMINIS, DR., IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY; KITTY LUGAR, DR., IN HER INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY; RADNOR TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellants in Nos. 05-4008 & 05-4009

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civ. No. 03-cv-01526) District Judge: Honorable Legrome D. Davis
Argued December 13, 2006 BEFORE: FISHER, CHAGARES and GREENBERG, Circuit Judges

ORDER AMENDING OPINION
It is hereby ordered that the opinion in this case filed March 22, 2007, is amended as follows:

## (1) In the third line of the third paragraph in footnote 11 of the slip opinion on page 15 the word “of” should be inserted between “resolution” and “the”; (2) In the third line of footnote 13 on page 19 the word “deposition” should be substituted for “disposition”; (3) In the last line of footnote 13 on page 19 “non-moving” should be substituted for “nonmoving”; (4) In the first line of footnote 14 on page 19 “DeFlaminis” should be substituted for “DeFalminis” and “Lugar” should be substituted for “Luger.”
By the Court,

/s/ Morton I. Greenberg Circuit Judge DATED: 27 March 2007
In the MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF Barry N. FRANK

No. D-3055

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Barry N. Frank, of Ridgefield, New Jersey, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.