alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 9/14 J

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 9 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4914 January 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 9

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4914 January 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 009/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2006/C 009/2 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections | 2 |
| 2006/C 009/3 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 3 |
| 2006/C 009/4 | State aid — United Kingdom — State aid C 45/2005 (ex N 364/2005) — Waste and Resource Action Programmes: aid for Printings and Writings paper reprocessing capacity — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty (1) | 6 |
| 2006/C 009/5 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4008 — Logista/Editorial Planeta/JV) (1) | 12 |
| 2006/C 009/6 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4058 — Logista/Planeta de Agostini/JV) (1) | 12 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2006/C 009/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2006/C 009/2

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections

2

2006/C 009/3

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

3

2006/C 009/4

State aid — United Kingdom — State aid C 45/2005 (ex N 364/2005) — Waste and Resource Action Programmes: aid for Printings and Writings paper reprocessing capacity — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty (1)

6

2006/C 009/5

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4008 — Logista/Editorial Planeta/JV) (1)

12

2006/C 009/6

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4058 — Logista/Planeta de Agostini/JV) (1)

12

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| 2006/C 009/7 | Corrigendum to the notice ‘Holidays in 2006’(OJ C 336, 31.12.2005) | 13 |

Corrigenda

2006/C 009/7

Corrigendum to the notice ‘Holidays in 2006’(OJ C 336, 31.12.2005)

(OJ C 336, 31.12.2005)

13

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# Official Journal C 145I/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 145I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 651 April 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 145I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 651 April 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 145 I/01 | Notice to economic operators, importers and exporters | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2022/C 145 I/01

Notice to economic operators, importers and exporters

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
GREENWICH STREET SERIES FUND
on behalf of the
MONEY MARKET PORTFOLIO and the
INTERMEDIATE HIGH GRADE PORTFOLIO 


Supplement dated June 19, 1997
to the Prospectus dated April 30, 1998

	The following information supplements, and to the extent 
inconsistent therewith, supersedes, the information set 
forth in the Prospectus under "Certain Investment 
Guidelines."

The Intermediate High Grade Portfolio may invest up to 
15% of its total assets in securities with contractual or 
other restrictions on resale and other instruments that 
are not readily marketable, including (a) repurchase 
agreements with maturities greater than seven days, (b) 
futures contracts and related options for which a liquid 
secondary market does not exist and (c) time deposits 
maturing in more than seven calendar days.  In the case 
of the Money Market Portfolio and the Intermediate High 
Grade Portfolio the above restriction does not apply to 
securities subject to Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 
1933, as amended. ("Rule 144A Securities").

Rule 144A Securities are unregistered securities 
restricted to purchase by "qualified institutional 
buyers" pursuant to Rule 144A under the 1933 Act.  
Because Rule 144A Securities are freely transferable 
among qualified institutional buyers, a liquid market may 
exist among such buyers.  The Board of Trustees has 
adopted guidelines and delegated to management the daily 
function of determining and monitoring liquidity of Rule 
144A securities.  However, the Board of Trustees 
maintains sufficient oversight and is ultimately 
responsible for the liquidity determinations.  
Investments in restricted securities such as Rule 144A 
securities could have the effect of increasing the level 
of illiquidity in the Portfolio to the extent that there 
is temporarily no market for these securities among 
qualified institutional buyers. 

________________
FD01487 6/98 
u:\legal\funds\$ssf\1998\secdocs\stk698.doc
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERREDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC.PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(CHAPTER 98, TITLE 15 U.S.C. SS. 7241)**

I, Steven J.Janusek, certify that:

1.      I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc.;

2.      Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.      Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; and

4.      Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)     Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)     Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.      Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)     Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlsover financial reporting.

**Date:  July 27, 2006**

| /s/ STEVEN J. JANUSEK                       |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|
| Steven J.  Janusek, Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Brandon BERNARD, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6992

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petitions for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# Official Journal L 223/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 223 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5918 August 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 223

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5918 August 2016

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1387 of 9 June 2016 amending Annexes I and III to Council Regulation (EC) No 2173/2005 following a Voluntary Partnership Agreement with Indonesia for a FLEGT licensing scheme for imports of timber into the European Union | 1 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1388 of 17 August 2016 establishing a Network Code on Demand Connection (
  1
  ) | 10 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1389 of 17 August 2016 authorising a health claim made on foods and referring to children's development and health (
  1
  ) | 55 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1390 of 17 August 2016 refusing to authorise a health claim made on foods and referring to children's development and health (
  1
  ) | 58 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1391 of 17 August 2016 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 60 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1387 of 9 June 2016 amending Annexes I and III to Council Regulation (EC) No 2173/2005 following a Voluntary Partnership Agreement with Indonesia for a FLEGT licensing scheme for imports of timber into the European Union

1

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1388 of 17 August 2016 establishing a Network Code on Demand Connection (
  1
  )

1

10

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1389 of 17 August 2016 authorising a health claim made on foods and referring to children's development and health (
  1
  )

1

55

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1390 of 17 August 2016 refusing to authorise a health claim made on foods and referring to children's development and health (
  1
  )

1

58

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1391 of 17 August 2016 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

60

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
James A. HARNAGE, Petitioner v. S. BARRONE, Deputy Warden, et al.

No. 19M90

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 21, 2020

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari out of time denied.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JAVON HESTER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-1452

[April 14, 2022]

Appeal from the County Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Sherri L. Collins, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2020-MM006358-AXXX-NB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Mara Herbert, Assistant Public 

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah Koenig, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, GERBER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Robert Gene RAND, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5742

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 7741

ELSON MCKANIC , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. WARDEN LEWIS , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Rock Hill

. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 0:19

- cv
- 02680

- HMH )

Submitted : May 20, 2020 Decided: August 7, 2020

Before WYNN, RICHARDSON, and R USHING , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Elson McKanic, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Elson McKanic seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing McKanic ’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2018) petition as an unauthorized, successive § 2254 petition

. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (201 8 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (201 8 ). When , as here, the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134,
140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. Because we did not authorize McKanic’s successive petition, we conclude that the district court’s procedural ruling was neither wrong nor debatable. So McKanic has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with or al argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with this  Quarterly  Report of Modena 3 Inc. (the  "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I John Fitzpatrick,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to
the best of his knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ John Fitzpatrick
--------------------------
John Fitzpatrick
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer

March 15, 2004
Elio GUTIERREZ, Petitioner v. CALIFORNIA

No. 19-751

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 21, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 117 (Friday, June 17, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 36571]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13027]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice of Intent To Release Certain Properties From All Terms, 
Conditions, Reservations and Restrictions of a Quitclaim Deed Agreement 
Between the City of Fernandina Beach and the Federal Aviation 
Administration for the Fernandina Beach Municipal Airport, Fernandina 
Beach, FL

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA hereby provides notice of intent to release 0.28 acres 
at the Fernandina Beach Municipal Airport, Fernandina Beach, FL from 
the conditions, reservations, and restrictions as contained in a 
Quitclaim Deed agreement between the FAA and the City of Fernandina 
Beach, dated July 9, 1947. The release of property will allow the City 
of Fernandina Beach to dispose of the property for other than 
aeronautical purposes. The property is located on the North side of 
Airport Road at the Fernandina Beach Municipal Airport, within the city 
limits of Fernandina Beach, Nassau County, Florida. The parcel is 
currently designated as surplus property. The property will be released 
of its federal obligations for the purpose of selling the property at 
fair market value for light industrial future commmerical development. 
The fair market value lease of this parcel has been determined to be 
$40,000.
    Documents reflecting the Sponsor's request are available, by 
appointment only, for inspection at the Fernandina Beach Municipal 
Airport and the FAA Airports District Office.

ADDRESSES: Documents are available for review at Fernandina Beach 
Municipal Airport, and the FAA Airports District Office, 8427 SouthPark 
Circle, Suite 524, Orlando, FL 32819. Written comments on the Sponsor's 
request must be delivered or mailed to: Jenny Iglesias-Hamann, 
Community Planner, Orlando Airports District Office, 8427 SouthPark 
Circle, Suite 524, Orlando, FL 32819.

DATES: Comments are due on or before July 18, 2022.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 125 of The Wendell H. Ford Aviation 
Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR-21) requires the 
FAA to provide an opportunity for public notice and comment prior to 
the ``waiver'' or ``modification'' of a sponsor's Federal obligation to 
use certain airport land for non-aeronautical purposes.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jenny Iglesias-Hamann, Community 
Planner, Orlando Airports District Office, 8427 SouthPark Circle, Suite 
524, Orlando, FL 32819.

Rebecca Henry Harper,
Acting Manager, Orlando Airports District Office, Southern Region.
[FR Doc. 2022-13027 Filed 6-16-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
# Official Journal C 285A/17 N

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 285A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4817 November 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 285A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4817 November 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Notices |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2005/C 285A/2 | Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AST/1/04 — Clerical officers (C*1) | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Notices

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2005/C 285A/2

Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AST/1/04 — Clerical officers (C*1)

3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
WILFRED WARREN SHEPPARD, Petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 19-5973

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

The petition for rehearing is denied.
# C_2018417EN.01000301.xml

| 16.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 417/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 417/3

---

Final Report of the Hearing Officer (1)

Apple/Shazam

(M.8788)

(2018/C 417/03)

1.

On 14 March 2018, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (2) (the ‘Merger Regulation’) by which Apple Inc. (the ‘Notifying Party’ or ‘Apple’) would acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of Shazam Entertainment Ltd (‘Shazam’) (the ‘Proposed Transaction’). (3) Apple and Shazam are collectively referred to hereinafter as ‘Parties’.

2.

On 23 April 2018, the Commission initiated proceedings pursuant to Article 6(1)(c) of the Merger Regulation, raising serious doubts as to the compatibility of the Proposed Transaction with the internal market and with the functioning of the EEA Agreement as a result of non-horizontal non-coordinated effects in respect of digital music streaming apps and automatic content recognition (‘ACR’) software solutions, including music recognition apps. On 15 May 2018, the Notifying Party submitted its reply to the Article 6(1)(c) Decision.

3.

On 15 May 2018, the Commission extended the second phase investigation period by ten working days at the request of the Notifying Party pursuant to the second subparagraph, first sentence, of Article 10(3) of the Merger Regulation.

4.

Following its investigation, the Commission concluded that the Proposed Transaction would not significantly impede effective competition in the internal market or in a substantial part of it. The decision therefore declares the Proposed Transaction compatible with the internal market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement.

5.

I have not received any request or complaint from the Parties about the exercise of their right to be heard. Overall, I consider that the effective exercise of procedural rights has been respected during the present proceedings.

Brussels, 23 August 2018.

Joos STRAGIER

---

(1)  Pursuant to Articles 16 and 17 of Decision 2011/695/EU of the President of the European Commission of 13 October 2011 on the function and terms of reference of the hearing officer in certain competition proceedings (OJ L 275, 20.10.2011, p. 29) (‘Decision 2011/695/EU’).

1

(2)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

2

(3)  The Proposed Transaction was initially notified to the Austrian competition authority on 21 December 2017. Following the latter’s referral request pursuant to Article 22(1) of the Merger Regulation, joined by the competition authorities of several other Member States, the Commission decided on 6 February 2018 to accept the referral request and to examine the Proposed Transaction pursuant to Article 22(3) of the Merger Regulation.

3

---
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Physicians Formula Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Ingrid Jackel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.





Date: November 9, 2009





By:
/s/ Ingrid JackelName:
Ingrid JackelTitle:
Chief Executive Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Physicians Formula Holdings, Inc. and will
be retained by Physicians Formula Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.