alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              7
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from Form 10-Q for
the three months ended March 31, 2000, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>      1

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                      MAR-31-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>              175,159,377
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                       0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                         0
<EQUITIES>                         12,883,068
<MORTGAGE>                                  0
<REAL-ESTATE>                               0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                    197,107,703
<CASH>                              1,351,307
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                          0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>             20,697,659
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    272,770,894
<POLICY-LOSSES>                    14,459,127
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                 6,753,048
<POLICY-OTHER>                              0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                       0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                    34,463,266
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                              133,132
<OTHER-SE>                        166,676,458
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      272,770,894
<PREMIUMS>                         17,144,448
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                 2,925,993
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                    777,881
<OTHER-INCOME>                          5,740
<BENEFITS>                          1,596,138
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>         2,000,147
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                4,111,183
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    12,454,056
<INCOME-TAX>                        3,802,540
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 8,651,516
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                        8,651,516
<EPS-BASIC>                            0.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0.63
<RESERVE-OPEN>                              0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                         0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                           0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                          0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                            0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                             0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                     0


</TABLE>
Michael D. HICKINGBOTTOM, Petitioner v. INDIANA.

No. 18-9137

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District denied.
Darrel Conell NEVELS, Petitioner v. PIGGLY WIGGLY CORPORATION, et al.;

No. 19-215

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
# C_2018241EN.01000201.xml

| 10.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 241/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 241/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8929 — Apollo Management/Generali Belgium)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 241/03)

On 3 July 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8929. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8929. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
TO ACCOMPANY FORM N-SAR


To the Trustees of Travelers Series Trust:

In planning and performing our audits of the financial statements and
financial highlights (hereafter referred to as "financial statements") of
the Funds of Travelers Series Trust: Equity Income Portfolio and Large Cap
Portfolio for the year ended December 31, 2000 we considered their internal
control, including control activities for safeguarding securities, in order
to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our
opinion on the financial statements and to comply with the requirements of
Form N-SAR,  not to provide assurance on internal control.

The management of the Trust is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates
and judgments by management are required to assess the expected benefits
and related costs of controls. Generally, controls that are relevant to an
audit pertain to the entity's objective of preparing financial statements
for external purposes that are fairly presented in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.  Those controls include the safeguarding of
assets against unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, misstatements
due to errors or fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of
any evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to the risk
that it may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the
effectiveness of the design and operation may deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily disclose all
matters in internal control that might be material weaknesses under standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A
material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of any
specific internal control component does not reduce to a relatively low level
the risk that misstatements due to errors or fraud in amounts that would be
material in relation to the financial statements being audited may occur and
not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of
performing their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters involving
internal control and its operation, including controls over safeguarding
securities, that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined above as of
December 31, 2000.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of management
and the Trustees of the Trust and the Securities and Exchange Commission.




                PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
February 6, 2001
KALEIDA HEALTH, dba Buffalo General Medical Center, Petitioner v. Kathleen BIONDO

No. 19-654

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1171 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1171

  To amend title 40, United States Code, to improve veterans service 
       organizations access to Federal surplus personal property.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 14, 2013

   Mr. Benishek (for himself, Ms. Brownley of California, Mr. Roe of 
 Tennessee, and Mr. O'Rourke) introduced the following bill; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 40, United States Code, to improve veterans service 
       organizations access to Federal surplus personal property.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Formerly Owned Resources for 
Veterans to Express Thanks for Service Act of 2013'' or the ``FOR VETS 
Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. VETERANS ACCESS TO FEDERAL EXCESS AND SURPLUS PERSONAL 
              PROPERTY.

    Section 549(c)(3) of title 40, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``or'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (B)--
                    (A) in clause (viii), by adding ``or'' at the end; 
                and
                    (B) by striking clause (x); and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) for purposes of providing services to 
                veterans (as defined in section 101 of title 38), to an 
                organization whose--
                            ``(i) membership comprises substantially 
                        veterans; and
                            ``(ii) representatives are recognized by 
                        the Secretary of Veterans Affairs under section 
                        5902 of title 38.''.
                                 <all>
```
Gettus Leroy MINTZ, Petitioner v. Charles L. RYAN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 19-5018

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
IN RE Recardo WIMBUSH, et ux., Petitioners.

No. 19-6134

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 21, 2019

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Wayne ENGLISH, Petitioner, v. ROADHOUSE HOLDING INC., et al.

No. 19-5109

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

The petition for rehearing is denied.
Saleem ELAMIN, Petitioner v. SUPERIOR COURT OF the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

No. 18-9375

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund V L.P. (the "Fund") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the Fund's general partner, Boston Capital Associates V L.L.C., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                  
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.



|                |  |                            
|--------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:           |  |                            
|August 19, 2004 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|                |  |                            
|                |  | Marc N. Teal               
|                |  | Principal Financial Officer
|                |  |                            
|                |  |                            



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Virginia HOWARD, Petitioner v. SAN DIEGO COUNTY COUNSEL, et al.;

No. 18-9090

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  /s/ Richard W. McCullough                    |   | December 15, 2010 |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------|
| Richard W. McCullough                              |   |
| Chief Executive Officer                            |   |
| Petroleum Development Corporation (dba PDC Energy) |   |
| Managing General Partner                           |   |
|                                               |   |
|  /s/ Gysle R. Shellum                         |   | December 15, 2010 |
| Gysle R. Shellum                                   |   |
| Chief Financial Officer                            |   |
| Petroleum Development Corporation (dba PDC Energy) |   |
| Managing General Partner                           |   |
|                                               |   |

----
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

In the Interest of A.K., a minor child.

E.K.,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and GUARDIAN AD LITEM 

PROGRAM,

Appellees.

No. 2D2024-0235

July 17, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Patrice Moore, Judge.

Rinky S. Parwani of Parwani Law, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

Bruce Bartlett, State Attorney, Sixth Judicial Circuit of Florida, and 

Leslie M. Layne, Assistant State Attorney, Clearwater, for Appellee 

Department of Children and Families.

Amy L. Dilday of Englander Fischer, Pro Bono, Statewide Guardian ad 

Litem Office, Defending Best Interests, St. Petersburg, and Sara 

Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Amanda Victoria 

Glass, Senior Attorney, Appellate Division, Statewide Guardian ad Litem

Office, Tallahassee, for Appellee Guardian ad Litem Program.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
2

SLEET, C.J., and VILLANTI and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Independent Auditors' Report


To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
The Travelers Series Trust:

In planning and performing our audits of the financial statements
of the Travelers Series Trust (the Funds) consisting of Zero
Coupon Bond Fund Portfolio Series 2005, Travelers Quality Bond
Portfolio, Lazard International Stock Portfolio, MFS Emerging
Growth Portfolio, Federated High Yield Portfolio, Federated Stock
Portfolio, Disciplined Mid Cap Stock Portfolio, Convertible
Securities Portfolio, MFS Mid Cap Growth Portfolio, MFS Research
Portfolio, MFS Value Portfolio, U.S. Government Securities
Portfolio, Social Awareness Stock Portfolio, and Utilities
Portfolio for the year ended December 31, 2002, we considered
their internal control, including control activities for
safeguarding securities, in order to determine our auditing
procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the
financial statements and to comply with the requirements of Form
N-SAR, not to provide assurance on internal control.

The management of the Funds is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Those controls include the safeguarding of assets against
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, error or
fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any
evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to
the risk that it may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in internal control that might be material
weaknesses under standards established by the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness is a
condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the
internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low
level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in
amounts that would be material in relation to the financial
statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a
timely period by employees in the normal course of performing
their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters involving
internal control and its operation, including controls for
safeguarding securities, that we consider to be material
weaknesses as defined above as of December 31, 2002.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management and the Board of Trustees of the Funds and the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not intended to be and
should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.



                                             KPMG LLP
New York, New York
February 12, 2003
T. B., Petitioner v. COLORADO

No. 19-6723

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Colorado denied.
ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS 

Having considered the United States’ Motion to Dismiss, the Court finds that it 

has merit and should be GRANTED. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the 

following forfeiture asset is DISMISSED: 

a. 2020 Mercedes Benz G550 SUV, VIN #WDCYC6BJ5LX336784 seized 

from Raman Bhaumik and Prasenjit Bhaumik 

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

§ 

v. § Case No. 4:24-CR-27 

§ Judge Jordan 

RAMAN BHAUMIK (7) 

a/k/a RamanDeep 

PRASENJIT BHAUMIK (8)

a/k/a Jay

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

 

 

Case 4:24-cr-00027-SDJ-BD Document 129 Filed 09/18/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:

379
# Official Journal C 2/5 Ja

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 2 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 495 January 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 2

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 495 January 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 002/1 | Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 2,25 % on 1 January 2006 — Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2006/C 002/2 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections | 2 |
| 2006/C 002/3 | Summary information on State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1/2004 of 23 December 2003 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production, processing and marketing of agricultural products | 5 |
| 2006/C 002/4 | State aid — Germany — State aid No C38/2005 (ex NN 52/2004) — Biria group — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty (1) | 14 |
| 2006/C 002/5 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 22 |
| | EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA |
| | EFTA Surveillance Authority |
| 2006/C 002/6 | Public presentation of the preliminary findings of the energy sector inquiry | 24 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2006/C 002/1

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 2,25 % on 1 January 2006 — Euro exchange rates

1

2006/C 002/2

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections

2

2006/C 002/3

Summary information on State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1/2004 of 23 December 2003 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production, processing and marketing of agricultural products

5

2006/C 002/4

State aid — Germany — State aid No C38/2005 (ex NN 52/2004) — Biria group — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty (1)

14

2006/C 002/5

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

22

EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA

EFTA Surveillance Authority

2006/C 002/6

Public presentation of the preliminary findings of the energy sector inquiry

24

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE CHICAGO LODGE NO. 7, Petitioner v. ILLINOIS

No. 18-1395

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
```

```

----

Updated April 11, 2014
# L_2013242EN.01S00301.xml

| 11.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 242/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 242/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union

In accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ L 69, 13.3.2013, p. 1), as of 1 July 2013, only the electronic edition of the Official Journal shall be considered authentic and shall have legal effect.

Official Journal of the European Union

Where it is not possible to publish the electronic edition of the Official Journal due to unforeseen and exceptional circumstances, the printed edition shall be authentic and shall have legal effect in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 216/2013.

---