alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Christopher Coffey, Vice President of Synchrony Card Funding LLC,
certify that:



1.       I have reviewed this report
on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Synchrony
Card Issuance Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2.       Based on my knowledge,
the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;



3.       Based on my knowledge,
all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report
is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;



4.       Based on my knowledge and
the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act
periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and



5.       All of the reports on assessment
of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with
servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any
material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.



In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware, Citibank, N.A. and Citicorp Trust Delaware, National
Association.













March 30, 2022



| | By:    | /s/ Christopher Coffey                                        
| | ------ | --------------------------------------------------------------
| | Name:  | Christopher Coffey                                            
| | Title: | Vice President, and senior officer in charge of securitization
```
 
 
WHEAT-HRSpring - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                          Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/18/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       66,646
COMMITMENTS
  14,146   10,395    3,718   34,893   38,962   52,757   53,075   13,889   13,571

CHANGES FROM 11/11/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -2,042)
  -1,267   -1,887      728   -1,307     -805   -1,846   -1,964     -196      -78

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    21.2     15.6      5.6     52.4     58.5     79.2     79.6     20.8     20.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       82)
      17       15       14       40       34       65       58
```

----

Updated November 21, 2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000830142
<NAME> ZENIX INCOME FUND INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                      147,383,513
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                     138,696,104
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,923,190
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                     512
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             142,619,806
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                     1,018,812
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                   30,739,816
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                         31,758,628
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                      0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                   138,895,216
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                       15,971,284
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                       15,690,134
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                    (138,061)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                   (19,580,773)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                   (8,315,204)
<NET-ASSETS>                               110,861,178
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                              143,953
<INTEREST-INCOME>                           13,591,762
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                               1,491,928
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                     12,243,787
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                   (8,989,043)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                  (5,686,535)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                      (2,431,791)
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                   12,451,025
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                              0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                          0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                            281,150
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                    (13,321,020)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                       (62,873)
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                 (18,854,685)
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                        1,037,953
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                              1,491,928
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                        88,069,570
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                             5.96
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                   0.78
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                         (0.94)
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                              0.78
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                         0.00
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                              0.00
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                               5.02
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                   3.73


</TABLE>
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 D0 17 0

. Z HI LI N et al

. v

. I NFI NI TY SAF E G U ARD I NSURANCE
COMPANY.

W e d i s m i ss ed t h i s ap p l i cat i o n as un t i m el y b ecau s e i t was fi l ed th ree m o n t h s

aft er t he t ri al co u rt ’ s o rd er d i s m i s s i n g t h e cas e. W e reas o n ed t h at an i n t eri m “ M o t i o n

t o Vacat e” fi l ed by p l ai n ti ffs Z h i L i n an d J i n g Ou was , i n s u b s t an ce, a m o t i o n fo r

reco n s i d erat i on t h at h ad n o t ex t en d ed t he t i m e fo r fi l i n g t h e ap p l icat i o n

. Li n an d Ou

n o w seek reco n s id erat i o n , u rg i n g u s to t reat t he “ M o t i o n t o Vacat e” as a m o t i o n t o s et

as i d e un d er OCGA § 9 -1 1 -6 0 (d ), t h e d en ial o f wh i ch i s ap p eal ab le b y t i m el y

ap p li cat io n u nd er O CGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (8 ). Fo r g oo d cau s e sh o wn , we h ereb y GRANT

t h e m o ti o n fo r reco n s i d era ti o n

. W e VACATE o ur p rev io us o rd er di sm i s s i n g t h e

ap p li cat io n , wh i ch i s h ereb y REINSTATED.

Up o n rev i ew o f t h e m eri t s , ho wev er, th e ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret io n ary ap p eal

i s GRANTED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 02/12/2016 February 12, 2016
# Official Journal L 171/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 171 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6528 June 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 171

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6528 June 2022

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2022/1007 of 20 June 2022 on the conclusion on behalf of the Union of the Partnership Agreement on Relations and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and New Zealand, of the other part | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Council Decision (EU) 2022/1007 of 20 June 2022 on the conclusion on behalf of the Union of the Partnership Agreement on Relations and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and New Zealand, of the other part

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Scott Thomas ERSKINE, Petitioner v. CALIFORNIA

No. 19-6235

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018340EN.01001301.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 24.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/13 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9060 — HP/Apogee)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 340/09)

1.

On 17 September 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018340EN.01001301-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | HP Inc. (‘HP’, United States), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Apogee Group Limited (‘Apogee’, United Kingdom). |

HP acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Apogee.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for HP: the manufacture and sale of electronic devices, including personal computers and printers,

—   for Apogee: the provision of managed print services to business users, primarily in the United Kingdom. Such services generally comprise a flexible combination of printer hardware, consumables, software, maintenance, workflow management, consulting, training and other related services.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9060 — HP/Apogee

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018340EN.01001301-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7679
DONDI A. JOHNSON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD F. MOATS; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-95- 1374-AMD) Submitted: February 12, 1998 Decided: March 4, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dondi A. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have thirty days within which to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only exceptions to the appeal period are when the district court extends the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The district court entered its order on August 11, 1997;Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on November 10, 1997. Appellant's failure to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain either an extension or a reopening of the appeal period leaves this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant'sappeal. We therefore deny a certificate of probable cause and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Colleen A. EASTERDAY, Petitioner v. ESTATE OF Michael J. EASTERDAY

No. 19-354

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District denied.
IN RE David Paul WORTHINGTON, Petitioner.

No. 19-6526.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Jan. 13, 2020.

Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.
Javier YEBRA, Petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 19-6488

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Independent Auditors' Report


To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
the Greenwich Street Series Fund Trust:

In planning and performing our audits of the financial statements
of Greenwich Street Series Fund Trust (the Funds) consisting of
Equity Index Portfolio, Money Market Portfolio, Diversified
Strategic Income Portfolio, Salomon Brothers Variable All Cap
Value Fund, Salomon Brothers Variable Emerging Growth Portfolio,
Salomon Brothers Variable International Equity Fund, Salomon
Brothers Variable Growth and Income Fund, Appreciation Portfolio,
Fundamental Value Portfolio, and Intermediate High Grade
Portfolio for the year ended December 31, 2002, we considered
their internal control, including control activities for
safeguarding securities, in order to determine our auditing
procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the
financial statements and to comply with the requirements of Form
N-SAR, not to provide assurance on internal control.

The management of the Funds is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Those controls include the safeguarding of assets against
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, error or
fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any
evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to
the risk that it may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in internal control that might be material
weaknesses under standards established by the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness is a
condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the
internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low
level the risk that misstatements caused by errors or fraud in
amounts that would be material in relation to the financial
statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a
timely period by employees in the normal course of performing
their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters involving
internal control and its operation, including controls for
safeguarding securities, that we consider to be material
weaknesses as defined above as of December 31, 2002.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management and the Board of Trustees of the Funds and the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not intended to be and
should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.


                                                  KPMG LLP

New York, New York
February 12, 2003
Scott WILSON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6419

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1264 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1264

 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to increase the Federal 
 medical assistance percentage for the District of Columbia under the 
                    Medicaid Program to 75 percent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 19, 2013

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to increase the Federal 
 medical assistance percentage for the District of Columbia under the 
                    Medicaid Program to 75 percent.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``District of Columbia Medicaid 
Reimbursement Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. INCREASING THE MEDICAID FEDERAL MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PERCENTAGE 
              FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TO 75 PERCENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 1905(b)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1396d(b)(3)) is amended by striking ``70 percent'' and inserting 
``75 percent''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to calendar quarters beginning on or after October 1, 2013.
                                 <all>
```
IA 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 41 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative 

to limiting the number of terms that a Member of Congress may serve. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 23, 2013 

Mr. SALMON (for himself, Mr. SCHWEIKERT, Mr. RICE of South Carolina, Mr. 

DESANTIS, Mr. BRIDENSTINE, and Mr. PITTENGER) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States relative to limiting the number of terms that 

a Member of Congress may serve. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 41 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. No person who has served 3 terms as 

3 a Representative shall be eligible for election to the House 

4 of Representatives. For purposes of this section, the elec5 tion of a person to fill a vacancy in the House of Rep6 resentatives shall be included as 1 term in determining 

7 the number of terms that such person has served as a Rep8 resentative if the person fills the vacancy for more than 

9 1 year. 

10 ‘‘SECTION 2. No person who has served 2 terms as 

11 a Senator shall be eligible for election or appointment to 

12 the Senate. For purposes of this section, the election or 

13 appointment of a person to fill a vacancy in the Senate 

14 shall be included as 1 term in determining the number 

15 of terms that such person has served as a Senator if the 

16 person fills the vacancy for more than 3 years. 

17 ‘‘SECTION 3. No term beginning before the date of 

18 the ratification of this article shall be taken into account 

19 in determining eligibility for election or appointment under 

20 this article.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS