alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017188EN.01002001.xml

| 14.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 188/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 188/20

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-subsidy measures

(2017/C 188/12)

1.   As provided for in Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the countervailing measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of subsidisation and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Organic coated steel products | The People’s Republic of China | Anti-subsidy duty | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 215/2013 imposing a countervailing duty on imports of certain organic coated steel products originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ L 73, 15.3.2013, p. 16). | 16.3.2018 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Organic coated steel products

The People’s Republic of China

Anti-subsidy duty

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 215/2013 imposing a countervailing duty on imports of certain organic coated steel products originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ L 73, 15.3.2013, p. 16).

16.3.2018

---

(1)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 55.

1

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1042 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Direct Red 243. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2013 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Direct Red 243. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DIRECT RED 243. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Direct Red 243 (CAS No. 

52953–36–3) (provided for 

in subheading 3204.14.30) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2016 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1042 IH

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# Official Journal C 418A/15 O

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 418A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6415 October 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 418A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6415 October 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 418 A/01 | The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) — Publication of a vacancy for the function of Executive Director (Temporary Agent – Grade AD 14) COM/2021/20069 | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2021/C 418 A/01

The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) — Publication of a vacancy for the function of Executive Director (Temporary Agent – Grade AD 14) COM/2021/20069

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6662

RONALD G. WHITESIDE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

SCOTLAND COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Wallace W. Dixon, 

Magistrate Judge. (1:10-cv-00386-WWD-WWD)

Submitted: August 15, 2011 Decided: September 20, 2011

Before KING, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald G. Whiteside, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, 

III, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Ronald G. Whiteside seeks to appeal the magistrate 

judge’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)

petition, finding it was untimely, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d) 

(2006), and denying a post-judgment motion seeking to “address 

the limit.”*

 * The parties consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by 

the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006).

 The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When 

relief is denied on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this 

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find 

that the magistrate judge’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When relief is denied on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record and 

conclude that Whiteside has not made the requisite showing. 
3

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave 

to proceed in forma pauperis, deny the motion for appointment of 

counsel and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/04/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      372,793
COMMITMENTS
  92,246  163,882   90,181  152,913   88,387  335,340  342,450   37,453   30,343

CHANGES FROM 05/28/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -16,594)
  -6,004    3,946   -1,160  -14,413  -15,366  -21,577  -12,580    4,983   -4,014

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    24.7     44.0     24.2     41.0     23.7     90.0     91.9     10.0      8.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      167)
      51       69       71       34       32      126      140
```

----

Updated June 7, 2013
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 12 , 2021

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 21

- 00330

- CR

WILLIAM WELDON JONES , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 212th District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Cou rt Cause No. 94

- CR

- 0354

MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an attempted appeal of the trial court ’ s order denying appellant a free copy of transcripts

. In Texas, appeals in criminal cases are permitted only when they are authorized by statute. State ex rel. Lyk os , 330 S.W.3d 904, 915 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011) ; see Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 44.02

. Generally, a criminal defendant may only appeal from a final judgment. See State v. Sellers , 790 S.W.2d 316, 321 n. 4 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990). The courts of appeals do not have jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders in a criminal appeal absent express2

statutory authority. Apolinar v. State , 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 ( Tex. Crim. App. 1991). See also Ragston v. State , 424 S.W.3d 49 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014)

.
The denial of a req ue st for transcripts is not a n appealable order. On July 8,
2021 , this court notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction unless a party demonstrated that the court has jurisdiction. Appellant ’ s

r esponse fails to demonstra te that this court has jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.
Because this appeal does not fall within the exceptions to the general rule that appeal may be taken only from a final judgment of conviction, we have no jurisdiction.
Accordingly, the appeal i s ordered dismissed.

PER CUR IAM

Panel consists of Justices Wi se, Bourliot, and Z i mmerer Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
Independent Auditors' Consent



To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Smith Barney Investment Funds Inc.:
- Smith Barney Government Securities Fund

We consent to the incorporation by reference, of our report
dated February 11, 2000 with respect to the Smith Barney
Government Securities Fund (the "Fund") of Smith Barney
Investment Funds Inc., in the Registration Statement on Form N-
14 for the Fund and to the references to our firm under the
headings "Synopsis" and "Agreement and Plan of Reorganization"
in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus.

/s/ KPMG LLP
KPMG LLP


New York, New York
July 13, 2000
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018196EN.01003401.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 8.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 196/34 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.8922 — Phoenix PIB Austria/Farmexim and Help Net Farma)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 196/12)

1.

On 30 May 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018196EN.01003401-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Phoenix PIB Austria Beteiligungs GmbH (Austria) (‘Phoenix’), belonging to the Phoenix companies group, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Farmexim SA, Romania (‘Farmexim’), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Help Net Farma SA, Romania (‘Help Net’). |

Phoenix acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Farmexim and Help Net.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   Phoenix Group: a pharmaceutical wholesale, pharmacy retail and related pharma services provider in Europe,

—   Farmexim: a full-line wholesaler of pharmaceutical products,

—   Help Net: operator of a chain of pharmacies in Romania.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018196EN.01003401-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.8922 — Phoenix PIB Austria/Farmexim and Help Net Farma

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018196EN.01003401-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018196EN.01003401-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
SMITH BARNEY MANAGED GOVERNMENTS FUND INC.


	ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT


	Smith Barney Managed Governments Fund Inc., a Maryland 
corporation, having its principal office in Baltimore City, Maryland 
(the "Corporation"), hereby certifies to the State Department of 
Assessments and Taxation of Maryland that:

	FIRST:  The Charter of the Corporation is hereby amended to 
provide that the name of all of the issued and unissued Class C Common 
Stock of the Corporation is hereby changed to Class L Common Stock. 

	SECOND:  The foregoing amendment to the Charter of the 
Corporation has been approved by a majority of the entire Board of 
Directors and is limited to a change expressly permitted by Section 2-
605 of the Maryland General Corporation Law to be made without action 
of the stockholders.

	THIRD:  The Corporation is registered as an open-end investment 
company under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

	FOURTH:  The amendment to the Charter of the Corporation 
effected hereby shall become effective at 9:00 a.m. on June 12, 1998. 

	IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Smith Barney Managed Governments Fund Inc. 
has caused these presents to be signed in its name and on its behalf 
by its President and witnessed by its Assistant Secretary as of June 
1, 1998.


WITNESS:					SMITH BARNEY MANAGED 
						GOVERNMENTS FUND INC.


/s/ Michael Kocur                             	 	By:   /s/ Heath 
B. McLendon           		 
Michael Kocur	 				       Heath B. McLendon
Assistant Secretary				       President
						



	

THE UNDERSIGNED, President of Smith Barney Managed Governments Fund 
Inc., who executed on behalf of the Corporation Articles of Amendment 
of which this Certificate is made a part, hereby acknowledges in the 
name and on behalf of said Corporation the foregoing Articles of 
Amendment to be the corporate act of said Corporation and hereby 
certifies that the matters and facts set forth herein with respect to 
the authorization and approval thereof are true in all material 
respects under the penalties of perjury.


							 /s/ Heath B. McLendon     
                     
							Heath B. McLendon, 
President
		
 

 
 

LEGAL\FUNDS\GOVT\GOVTAMND.DOC
David MEYERS, Petitioner v. Walter SWINEY, et al.

No. 18-8735

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
Luis FUQUEN, Petitioner v. Trina EVERITT

No. 19-6214

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until December 30, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

BRIAN OVERTON,

Appellant,

v.

NSU GRANDE OAKS, LLC,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-2184

[August 25, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Nicholas Richard Lopane, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE19-016421 (03).

Scott M. Behren of Behren Law Firm, Weston, for appellant.

Richard A. Beauchamp and Benjamin P. Bean of Panza, Maurer & 

Maynard, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., GROSS and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Frankie Karen WASHINGTON, Petitioner v. Deborah JOHNSON, Warden.

No. 18-9299

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  each of the  undersigned  officers  of  GreenShift
Corporation (the "Company"), certifies that:

1.   The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10Q/A of the  Company  for the period  ended
     September 30, 2008 (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements of
     Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
     78m or 78o(d)); and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated :  November 19, 2008      /S/           KEVIN KREISLER
                                ----------------------------
                                              KEVIN KREISLER
                                              Chief Executive Officer


                                /S/           EDWARD R. CARROLL
                                --------------------------------
                                              EDWARD R. CARROLL
                                              Chief Financial Officer


This  certification  is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,
subject  to the  knowledge  standard  contained  therein,  and not for any other
purpose.
Independent Auditors' Consent



To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
Smith Barney Aggressive Growth Fund Inc.:

We consent to the use of our report dated October 15, 1997, for 
the Smith Barney Aggressive Growth Fund Inc. incorporated herein 
by reference and to the references to our Firm under the 
headings "Financial Highlights" in the Prospectus and "Counsel 
and Auditors" in the Statement of Additional Information.
 



	KPMG Peat Marwick 
LLP


New York, New York
December 19, 1997
# Official Journal C 182A/15 J

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 182A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4715 July 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 182A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4715 July 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 182A/1 | Common catalogue of agricultural plant species — 11th supplement to the 22nd complete edition | 1 |
| 2004/C 182A/2 | Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — fifth supplement to the 22nd complete edition | 33 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 182A/1

Common catalogue of agricultural plant species — 11th supplement to the 22nd complete edition

1

2004/C 182A/2

Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — fifth supplement to the 22nd complete edition

33

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Charles R. WILLARD, Petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION.

No. 18-9556

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 11, 2009 

s0831 

Order 

 

September 11, 2009 

138493 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138493 

 COA: 280417 

Kent CC: 06-009403-FH 

DONALD ALLEN LUCAS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 29, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Financial 
Statements and Experts" and to the incorporation by reference 
herein of our report dated December 6, 1996, with respect to 
the financial statements and financial highlights of each of the 
funds constituting the Common Sense Trust included in Post-Effective 
Amendment No. 18 to the Registration Statement (Form N-1A) and 
related Prospectus of Common Sense Trust.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Houston, Texas

October 16, 1997
Delroy T. BOOTH, Petitioner v. Trevonza BOBBITT, Warden, et al.

No. 18-9129

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-10751

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LAUREN GARZA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:07-CR-68-2

Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Lauren Garza has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Garza has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 22, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 09-10751 Document: 00511149833 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010
Gerald NELSON, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

No. 19-6338

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for rehearing denied.