alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
 I, Ronald A. Klein, certify that:
 1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Origen Financial, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)), and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(g)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
   /s/ Ronald A. Klein
    
    Dated: August 7, 2007Ronald A. Klein,Chief Executive Officer of Origen Financial, Inc.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-19-00046-CV

UNIVISION RADIO CORPORATION,

Appellant

v.

Angel SUAREZ,

Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-CI-21079

Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 31, 2019

DISMISSED

Appellant Univision Radio Corporation filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. Appellee 

Angel Suarez has not opposed the motion. Therefore, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Costs of the appeal are taxed against the party who incurred them.

PER CURIAM
**
Exhibit 35.1 

Servicer Compliance Statement of Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation 

**NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

The undersigned, Kevin J. Cullum, President and Chief Executive Officer of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the“Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such corporate officer, as follows: 

(1) The undersigned has caused a reviewof the activities of the Company, in its capacity as Servicer, during the 12-month period ended March 31, 2019 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to the Sale and ServicingAgreement, dated as of December 13, 2017 (the “Agreement”), by and among the Company, individually and as servicer, Nissan Auto Receivables Corporation II, as seller, and Nissan Auto Receivables2017-C Owner Trust, to be conducted under his supervision; and 

(2) To the best of theundersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB forpublicly-issued asset-backed securities. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 27th day of June, 2019. 

 

/s/ Kevin J. Cullum
Kevin J. CullumPresident and Chief Executive Officer**
#### GEORGE KEMP REAL ESTATE CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 62, Docket 22373.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued May 6, 1953.

Decided June 18, 1953.

Alexander S. Andrews, New York City, for petitioner.

H. Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack and Harry Marselli, Special Assts. to the Atty. Gen., for Commissioner of Internal Revenue, respondent.

Before AUGUSTUS N. HAND, CHASE and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Since the Tax Court based its decision on the application as a matter of law of the doctrine, of collateral estoppel, we have jurisdiction to review despite the provisions .of § 732(c) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. § 732(c). Compare H. Fendrich, Inc. v. Commissioner, 7 Cir., 192 F.2d 916 with George Kemp Real Estate Co. v. Commissioner, 2 Cir., 182 F.2d 847, certiorari denied 340 U.S. 852, 71 S.Ct. 80, 95 L.Ed. 624. The decision was not, in the language of the statute, “necessary solely by.reason of section * * * 722.” •

The-principles of collateral estoppel were correctly applied and the decision is affirmed on the opinion of the Tax Court, 17 T.C. 755,
----

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 2204/2002 of 5 December 2002 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid for employment

(2006/C 37/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)  With the exception of the shipbuilding sector and of other sectors subject to special rules in regulations and directives governing all state aid within the sector.

(2)  With the exception of the shipbuilding sector and of other sectors subject to special rules in regulations and directives governing all state aid within the sector.

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

DANIEL Y. GATI,

 Petitioner

 v.

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH OF THE

COMMONWEALTH SYSTEM OF

HIGHER EDUCATION,

 Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 329 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of December, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED.
# Official Journal C 133/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 133 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6210 April 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 133

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6210 April 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 133/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2019/C 133/02 | Commission Implementing Decision of 3 April 2019 on the publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of the application for approval of an amendment, which is not minor, to a product specification referred to in Article 53 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council for the name ‘Roquefort’ (PDO) | 2 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2019/C 133/03 | Publication pursuant to Article 10(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community (Recast) of decisions by Member States to grant, suspend or revoke operating licences (
  1
  ) | 14 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 133/01

Euro exchange rates

1

2019/C 133/02

Commission Implementing Decision of 3 April 2019 on the publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of the application for approval of an amendment, which is not minor, to a product specification referred to in Article 53 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council for the name ‘Roquefort’ (PDO)

Official Journal of the European Union

2

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2019/C 133/03

Publication pursuant to Article 10(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community (Recast) of decisions by Member States to grant, suspend or revoke operating licences (
  1
  )

1

14

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 133/04 | Notice concerning the anti-dumping measures in force in respect of imports of certain grain-oriented flat-rolled products of silicon-electrical steel originating, inter alia, in Japan: name change of one company subject to the anti-dumping duty rate for cooperating non-sampled companies | 34 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL POLICY

European Commission

2019/C 133/04

Notice concerning the anti-dumping measures in force in respect of imports of certain grain-oriented flat-rolled products of silicon-electrical steel originating, inter alia, in Japan: name change of one company subject to the anti-dumping duty rate for cooperating non-sampled companies

34

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# C_2017174EN.01000201.xml

| 1.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 174/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 174/2

---

Notice for the attention of certain persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(2017/C 174/03)

The following information is brought to the attention of Mr Sergey Valeryevich AKSYONOV (no. 1), Mr Rustam Ilmirovich TEMIRGALIEV (no. 3), Mr Aleksandr Viktorovich GALKIN (no. 21), Mr Andriy Yevhenovych PURHIN (no. 45), Mr Sergey Gennadevich TSYPLAKOV (no. 47), Mr Roman Viktorovich LYAGIN (no. 58), Mr Aleksey Vyacheslavovich KARYAKIN (no. 68), Mr Mikhail Efimovich FRADKOV (no. 73), Mr Vladimir ANTYUFEYEV (no. 87), Mr Yevgeniy Vyacheslavovich ORLOV (no. 131), Mr Eduard Aleksandrovich BASURIN (no. 137), Mr Evgeny Vladimirovich MANUILOV (no. 143), Mr Anatoly Ivanovich ANTONOV (no. 147), Azov distillery plant (entity listed under no. 17), Federal state budget enterprise for science and research ‘Pan Russian national scientific research institute for wine growing and wine making “Magarach” Russian Academy of Science, formerly known as State Unitary Enterprise of the “Republic of Crimea” National Institute of Wine “Magarach”’ (entity listed under no. 19), Russian National Commercial Bank (no. 23), Sparta battalion (no. 30) and Somali battalion (no. 31), appearing in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP (1) and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (2) concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.

1

2

The Council is considering maintaining the restrictive measures against the above-mentioned persons and entities with new statements of reasons. Those persons and entities are hereby informed that they may submit a request to the Council to obtain the intended statements of reasons for their designation, before 16 June 2017, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The persons and entities concerned may submit at any time a request to the Council, together with any supporting documentation, that the decision to include and maintain them on the list should be reconsidered, to the address provided above.

---

(1)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 16.

1

(2)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.

2

---
**Exhibit
        32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss.
      1350**





**(SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)**





I, Li
      Chi
      Yuen ,
      Chief
      Financial Officer of China-Biotics, Inc. (the "Registrant"), certify pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
      the
      period ended September 30, 2006 of the Registrant (the "Report"):





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                The Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Registrant.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








/s/ Li
      Chi
      Yuen




Li
      Chi
      Yuen


Chief
      Financial Officer


November
      14, 2006











30
Exhibit 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT  OF  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

The undersigned hereby certify that the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 filed by
TNS, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.

Dated: November 9, 2010/s/ HENRY H. GRAHAM, JR. Henry H. Graham, Jr. Chief Executive OfficerDated: November 9, 2010/s/ DENNIS L. RANDOLPH, JR. Dennis L. Randolph, Jr. Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


---



QuickLinks
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-4548

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. XZERIA DAMONT JETER, a/k/a D, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (7:07-cr-01467-HFF-25)

Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: December 28, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce A. Byrholdt, CHAPMAN, BYRHOLDT & YON, LLP, Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellant. W. Walter Wilkins, III, United States Attorney, William J. Watkins, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: A jury convicted Xzeria Damont Jeter of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute cocaine and cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2006). Based on the drug quantity found by the jury and an enhancement filed by the Government, Jeter faced a mandatory minimum sentence of 240 months’ imprisonment. However, in exchange for Jeter’s waiver of his appellate rights, the Government withdrew the enhancement and Jeter consequently received a significantly lower sentence of 121 months’ imprisonment. Jeter now appeals, arguing that at trial the Government failed to disclose certain evidence, in violation of United States v. Brady , 373 U.S. 83 (1963). The Government responds that the appellate waiver should be enforced and this appeal dismissed. We agree. A defendant may waive the right to appeal if that waiver is knowing and intelligent. United States v. Poindexter , 492 F.3d 263, 270 (4th Cir. 2007). Generally, if the district court fully questions a defendant regarding the waiver of his right to appeal, the waiver is both valid and enforceable. United States v. Johnson , 410 F.3d 137, 151 (4th Cir. 2005); United States v. Wessells , 936 F.2d 165, 167-68 (4th Cir. 1991). The question of whether a defendant validly waived his right to3 appeal is a question of law that we review de novo. United States v. Blick , 408 F.3d 162, 168 (4th Cir. 2005). Our review of the record leads us to conclude that Jeter knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal. Because Jeter’s valid and enforceable waiver of appellate rights precludes review of his conviction issue, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000810271
<NAME> CONCERT INVESTMENT SERIES
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER> 5
   <NAME> GOVERNMENT FUND. CLASS B

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                      212,215,830
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                     209,381,128
<RECEIVABLES>                               29,194,763
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                  83,359
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             238,659,250
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                    28,666,934
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                   10,088,740
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                         38,755,674
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                      0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                   244,692,654
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                        1,754,278
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                        1,344,435
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                     (33,389)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                   (41,920,987)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                   (2,834,702)
<NET-ASSETS>                               199,903,576
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                                    0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                           13,725,762
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                               2,241,108
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                     11,484,654
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                  (14,929,868)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                  (4,187,618)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                      (7,632,832)
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                   10,668,655
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                        75,530
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                      1,037,836
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                    699,803
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                             71,810
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                    (41,593,667)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                       (20,456)
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                 (26,920,626)
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                        1,320,702
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                                      0
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                       185,630,113
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                            10.66
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                  00.43
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                         (0.87)
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                             00.43
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                            0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                              09.79
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                  01.94


</TABLE>
Keith D. GOODMAN, Petitioner v. Eddie PEARSON, Warden

No. 19-6714

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Jagdish C. LAUL, Petitioner v. LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORIES.

No. 19-178

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 12, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Aamir A. HAFIZ-THOMPSON, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6799

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Antoaneta IOTOVA, et al., Petitioners, v. MCCABE, WEISBERG AND CONWAY, LLC.

No. 18-9551

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 07, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000873637
<NAME> European Portfolio
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER>003
   <NAME>Smith Barney World Funds, Inc.

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 Oct-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                      Oct-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>              60,118,782
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>             97,980,281
<RECEIVABLES>                       2,973,861
<ASSETS-OTHER>                     12,931,600
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    113,885,742
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                    0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>          13,221,036
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                13,221,036
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                             0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>           56,718,579
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                 681,757
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                 532,186
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                   0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                      0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>             6,086,897
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                    0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>           37,859,230
<NET-ASSETS>                      100,664,706
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                   1,226,392
<INTEREST-INCOME>                     188,064
<OTHER-INCOME>                              0
<EXPENSES-NET>                      1,961,302
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>              (546,846)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>            6,634,890
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>          12,866,643
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>              18,954,687
<EQUALIZATION>                              0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                   0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>              607,874
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                       0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>             1,015,248
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>           889,757
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                    24,080
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>             19,547,108
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                     0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>           4,139,408
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                     0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                  0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                 906,567
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                     1,961,302
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>               15,774,445
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                  21.790
<PER-SHARE-NII>                        (0.220)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                 3.940
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                    0.000
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>               1.130
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                    0.000
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                    25.520
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                          2.28



</TABLE>