35734 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 113 / Monday, June 13, 2022 / Notices 

1See Certain Coated Paper Suitable for HighQuality Print Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses 

from the People’s Republic of China: Amended 

Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair 

Value and Antidumping Order, 75 FR 70203 

(November 17, 2010); see also Certain Coated Paper 

Suitable for High-Quality Graphics Using Sheet-Fed 

Presses from Indonesia: Antidumping Duty Order, 

75 FR 70205 (November 17, 2010); Certain Coated 

Paper Suitable for High-Quality Print Graphics 

Using Sheet-Fed Presses from the People’s Republic 

of China: Amended Final Affirmative 

Countervailing Duty Determination and 

Countervailing Duty Order, 75 FR 70201 (November 

17, 2010); and Certain Coated Paper Suitable for 

High-Quality Print Graphics Using Sheet-Fed 

Presses from Indonesia: Countervailing Duty Order, 

75 FR 70206 (November 17, 2010) (collectively, 

Orders). 

2See Certain Coated Paper Suitable for HighQuality Print Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses 

from China and Indonesia; Institution of Five-Year 

Reviews, 86 FR 68272 (December 1, 2021). 

3See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 86 

FR 68220 (December 1, 2021). 

4See Coated Paper Suitable for High-Quality 

Print Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses from 

Indonesia and the People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of the Second Expedited Sunset Reviews of 

the Antidumping Duty Orders, 87 FR 19664 (April 

5, 2022); see also Certain Coated Paper Suitable for 

High-Quality Print Graphics Using Sheet-Fed 

Presses from the People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Expedited Second Sunset Review of the 

Countervailing Duty Order, 87 FR 18354 (March 30, 

2022); and Certain Coated Paper Suitable for HighQuality Print Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses 

from Indonesia: Final Results of Expedited Second 

Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 87 

FR 16715 (March 24, 2022). 

5See Certain Coated Paper Suitable for HighQuality Print Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses 

from China and Indonesia, 87 FR 34719 (June 7, 

2022); see also ITC’s Letter, Investigation Nos. 701– 

TA–470–471 and 731–TA–1169–1170 (Second 

Review), dated June 2, 2022. 

6 ‘‘Paperboard’’ refers to Certain Coated Paper that 

is heavier, thicker and more rigid than coated paper 

which otherwise meets the product description. In 

the context of Certain Coated Paper, paperboard 

typically is referred to as ‘‘cover,’’ to distinguish it 

from ‘‘text.’’ 

7One of the key measurements of any grade of 

paper is brightness. Generally speaking, the brighter 

the paper the better the contrast between the paper 

and the ink. Brightness is measured using a GE 

Reflectance Scale, which measures the reflection of 

light off of a grade of paper. One is the lowest 

reflection, or what would be given to a totally black 

grade, and 100 is the brightest measured grade. 

Background 

On November 17, 2010, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 

AD and CVD orders on coated paper 

from China and Indonesia.1 On 

December 1, 2021, the ITC instituted,2

and Commerce initiated,3 the second 

sunset reviews of the Orders, pursuant 

to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). As a result 

of its reviews, Commerce determined 

that revocation of the Orders would 

likely lead to the continuation or 

recurrence of dumping and 

countervailable subsidies and, therefore, 

notified the ITC of the magnitude of the 

margins and net subsidy rates likely to 

prevail should the Orders be revoked.4

On June 7, 2022, the ITC published its 

determinations, pursuant to sections 

751(c) and 752(a) of the Act, that 

revocation of the Orders would likely 

lead to continuation or recurrence of 

material injury to an industry in the 

United States within a reasonably 

foreseeable time.5

Scope of the Orders 

The merchandise covered by the 

Orders includes certain coated paper 

and paperboard 6 in sheets suitable for 

high quality print graphics using sheetfed presses; coated on one or both sides 

with kaolin (China or other clay), 

calcium carbonate, titanium dioxide, 

and/or other inorganic substances; with 

or without a binder; having a GE 

brightness level of 80 or higher,7

weighing not more than 340 grams per 

square meter; whether gloss grade, satin 

grade, matte grade, dull grade, or any 

other grade of finish; whether or not 

surface-colored, surface-decorated, 

printed (except as described below), 

embossed, or perforated; and 

irrespective of dimensions (Certain 

Coated Paper). 

Certain Coated Paper includes (a) 

coated free sheet paper and paperboard 

that meets this scope definition; (b) 

coated groundwood paper and 

paperboard produced from bleached 

chemi-thermo-mechanical pulp 

(BCTMP) that meets this scope 

definition; and (c) any other coated 

paper and paperboard that meets this 

scope definition. 

Certain Coated Paper is typically (but 

not exclusively) used for printing multicolored graphics for catalogues, books, 

magazines, envelopes, labels and wraps, 

greeting cards, and other commercial 

printing applications requiring high 

quality print graphics. 

Specifically excluded from the scope 

are imports of paper and paperboard 

printed with final content printed text 

or graphics. 

Imports of the subject merchandise 

are provided for under the following 

categories of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS): 

4810.14.11, 4810.14.1900, 4810.14.2010, 

4810.14.2090, 4810.14.5000, 

4810.14.6000, 4810.14.70, 4810.19.1100, 

4810.19.1900, 4810.19.2010, 

4810.19.2090, 4810.22.1000, 4810.22.50, 

4810.22.6000, 4810.22.70, 4810.29.1000, 

4810.29.5000, 4810.29.6000, 4810.29.70, 

4810.32, 4810.39 and 4810.92. While 

HTSUS subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the scope of the 

Orders is dispositive. 

Continuation of the Orders 

As a result of the determinations by 

Commerce and the ITC that revocation 

of the Orders would likely lead to 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury to an industry in the United 

States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(a), 

Commerce hereby orders the 

continuation of the Orders. U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection will 

continue to collect AD and CVD cash 

deposits at the rates in effect at the time 

of entry for all imports of subject 

merchandise. 

The effective date of continuation of 

the Orders will be the date of 

publication in the Federal Register of 

this notice of continuation. Pursuant to 

section 751(c)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(c)(2), Commerce intends to 

initiate the next five-year reviews of the 

Orders not later than 30 days prior to 

the fifth anniversary of the effective date 

of continuation. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return/destruction or conversion to 

judicial protective order of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). 

Failure to comply is a violation of the 

APO which may be subject to sanctions. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

These five-year (sunset) reviews and 

this notice are in accordance with 

sections 751(c) and 751(d)(2) of the Act 

and published in accordance with 

section 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(f)(4). 

Dated: June 7, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2022–12706 Filed 6–10–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–583–854] 

Certain Steel Nails From Taiwan: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, 

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments, and Partial Rescission of 

Review; 2020–2021 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 113 / Monday, June 13, 2022 / Notices 35735 

1See Certain Steel Nails from the Republic of 

Korea, Malaysia, the Sultanate of Oman, Taiwan, 

and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 

Antidumping Duty Orders, 80 FR 39994 (July 13, 

2015) (Order). 

2See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

To Request Administrative Review, 86 FR 35065 

(July 1, 2021). 

3See Harris Bricken’s Letter, ‘‘Administrative 

Review Request,’’ dated July 30, 2021. 

4See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Request for 

Administrative Reviews,’’ dated July 30, 2021. 

5Commerce determined that Liang Chyuan 

Industrial Co., Ltd. and Integral Building Products 

Inc. comprise a single entity in Certain Steel Nails 

from Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2017–2018, 84 FR 

48116 (September 12, 2019), unchanged in Certain 

Steel Nails from Taiwan: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Determination of No Shipments; 2017–2018, 85 FR 

14635 (March 13, 2020). Because there is nothing 

on the record calling into question our prior 

finding, we continue to treat these companies as 

part of a single entity for this administrative review. 

6See Appleton Luff’s Letter, ‘‘Administrative 

Review Request,’’ dated August 2, 2021. 

Commerce’s practice dictates that, where a deadline 

falls on a weekend or Federal holiday, the 

appropriate deadline is the next business day. See 

Notice of Clarification: Application of ‘‘Next 

Business Day’’ Rule for Administrative 

Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act 

of 1930, As Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005). 

Therefore, this request for review was timely. 

7See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 

50034 (September 7, 2021) (Initiation Notice). 

8See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Withdrawal of Review 

Request,’’ dated September 16, 2021. 

9See Harris Bricken’s Letter, ‘‘Withdrawal of 

Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated 

September 16, 2021. However, while Liang Kai Co. 

withdrew its request for review, the petitioner did 

not withdraw its review request for this company. 

10 Despite the petitioner’s withdrawal of the sole 

review request with respect to Integral Building 

Products Inc., we do not intend to rescind the 

review with respect to this company because it is 

part of a single entity with Liang Chyuan Industrial 

Co., Ltd., for which a review request remains. 

11See Appendix III. 

12See Memorandum, ‘‘Respondent Selection,’’ 

dated December 8, 2021. 

13See Memorandum, ‘‘Selection of Additional 

Mandatory Respondent,’’ dated January 12, 2022. 

14See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review: Certain Steel Nails from 

Taiwan; 2020–2021,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum). 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 

determines that certain steel nails from 

Taiwan were sold in the United States 

at less than normal value during the 

period of review (POR), July 1, 2020, 

through June 30, 2021. Interested parties 

are invited to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable June 13, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Irene Gorelik, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VIII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–6905. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 13, 2015, the Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) published the 

antidumping duty (AD) order on certain 

steel nails (nails) from Taiwan.1 On July 

1, 2021, Commerce published in the 

Federal Register a notice of opportunity 

to request an administrative review of 

the Order.2 On July 30, 2021, Encore 

Green Co., Ltd. and Liang Kai Co. 

requested an administrative review.3 On 

July 30, 2021, Commerce received a 

request for an administrative review of 

128 producers and/or exporters of 

subject merchandise, filed on behalf of 

Mid Continent Steel & Wire, Inc. (the 

petitioner).4 On August 2, 2021, Liang 

Chyuan Industrial Co., Ltd.5 requested 

an administrative review of itself.6 On 

September 7, 2021, we initiated an 

administrative review of certain steel 

nails from Taiwan covering all 

companies for which a review was 

requested in accordance with section 

751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i).7

On September 16, 2021, the petitioner 

filed a timely letter withdrawing its 

request for review of 61 of the 128 

companies originally requested for 

review.8 On September 16, 2021, Encore 

Green Co., Ltd. and Liang Kai Co. also 

withdrew their requests for review.9

Further, while the petitioner withdrew 

its review request for Liang Chyuan 

Industrial Co., Ltd. and Integral 

Building Products, Inc., Liang Chyuan 

Industrial Co., Ltd. did not withdraw its 

request for review of itself.10 Therefore, 

we are not rescinding the review of: (1) 

the single entity comprising Liang 

Chyuan Industrial Co., Ltd. and Integral 

Building Products Inc.; or (2) Liang Kai 

Co., because active review requests 

remain on the record for them. We are 

rescinding the review with respect to 

the 59 companies 11 for which all 

requests for review were timely 

withdrawn by interested parties. 

On December 8, 2021, we selected 

King Chuang Wen Trading Co., Ltd. 

(King Chuang) and the single entity 

comprising Liang Chyuan Industrial Co., 

Ltd. and Integral Building Products Inc. 

(collectively, Liang Chyuan) as 

mandatory respondents in this 

administrative review.12 King Chuang 

and Liang Chyuan did not respond to 

the AD questionnaire. On January 12, 

2022, we selected Liang Kai Co., as an 

additional mandatory respondent.13

Liang Kai Co. did not respond to the AD 

questionnaire. 

For a complete description of the 

events that followed the initiation of 

this administrative review, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum.14

The Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

is a public document and is on file 

electronically via the Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly on the internet at https://

access.trade.gov/public/FRNotices

ListLayout.aspx. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by this 

Order is certain steel nails from Taiwan. 

The certain steel nails subject to the 

Order are currently classifiable under 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) subheadings 

7317.00.55.02, 7317.00.55.03, 

7317.00.55.05, 7317.00.55.07, 

7317.00.55.08, 7317.00.55.11, 

7317.00.55.18, 7317.00.55.19, 

7317.00.55.20, 7317.00.55.30, 

7317.00.55.40, 7317.00.55.50, 

7317.00.55.60, 7317.00.55.70, 

7317.00.55.80, 7317.00.55.90, 

7317.00.65.30, 7317.00.65.60 and 

7317.00.75.00. Certain steel nails subject 

to this Order also may be classified 

under HTSUS subheadings 

7907.00.60.00, 8206.00.00.00 or other 

HTSUS subheadings. Although the 

HTSUS numbers are provided for 

convenience and for customs purposes, 

the written product description, 

available in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum, remains dispositive. 

Partial Rescission of Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

Commerce will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if the party that requested the 

review withdraws its request within 90 

days of the publication of the notice of 

initiation of the requested review. 

Because all requests for administrative 

review of the 59 companies listed in 

Appendix III were withdrawn by 

interested parties within 90 days of the 

date of publication of the Initiation 

Notice, and no other interested party 

requested a review of them, Commerce 

is rescinding this review with respect to 

these companies, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.213(d)(1). 

The administrative review remains 

active with respect to 69 companies 

(including the two companies 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
35736 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 113 / Monday, June 13, 2022 / Notices 

15See Memorandum, ‘‘No Shipment Inquiry,’’ 

dated January 21, 2022, where CBP confirmed that 

‘‘CBP’s Base Metals ran an ACE query . . . and 

found no entries by: Wiresmith, Astrotech Steels 

Private Limited Company; Geekay Wires Limited; 

Region System, or Region System Sdn. Bhd.; Region 

Industries, or Region Industries Co., Ltd. . . .’’ 

16See Create Trading Letter, ‘‘Statement of No 

Sales to the United States,’’ dated October 7, 2021; 

see also Wiresmith Letter, ‘‘Statement of No Sales 

to the United States,’’ dated October 7, 2021 

(Wiresmith SNS). 

17See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment of 

Antidumping Duties). 

18 Id. 

19See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

from India: Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 73 FR 77610, 77612 

(December 19, 2008) (Shrimp from India); Certain 

Pasta from Turkey: Notice of Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 

23974, 23977 (April 29, 2011), unchanged in Pasta 

from Turkey: Notice of Final Results of the 14th 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 

68399 (November 4, 2011) (Pasta from Turkey). 

20See Albemarle Corp. v. United States, 821 F.3d 

1345 (Fed. Cir. 2016) (Albemarle). 

21See Statement of Administrative Action 

Accompanying the Uruguay Round Agreements 

Act, H.R. Rep. No. 103–316, Vol. 1 (1994) (SAA) at 

873 (when ‘‘the dumping margins for all of the 

exporters and producers that are individually 

investigated are determined entirely on the basis of 

the facts available or are zero or de minimis . . . 

{t}he expected method in such cases will be to 

weight-average the zero and the de minimis margins 

and margins determined pursuant to the facts 

available.’’). 

comprising the single Liang Chyuan 

entity, but listed separately in the 

Initiation Notice). 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) 

of the Act. For a full description of the 

methodology underlying the 

preliminary results, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. 

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

Commerce received no-shipment 

certifications from four companies: 

Astrotech Steels Private Limited, 

Geekay Wires Limited, Region 

Industries Co., Ltd., and Region System 

Sdn. Bhd. To confirm these companies’ 

no-shipment claims, Commerce issued a 

no-shipment inquiry to U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) and 

received no contradictory information.15

Therefore, we preliminarily determine 

that these four companies did not have 

any shipments of subject merchandise 

during the POR. Consistent with 

Commerce’s practice, we will not 

rescind the review with respect to these 

companies, but, rather, will complete 

the review and issue instructions based 

on the final results. 

Additionally, Wiresmith Industrial 

Co., Ltd. (Wiresmith) and Create 

Trading Co., Ltd. (Create Trading) are 

resellers of subject merchandise that 

reported that they had no reviewable 

sales or shipments during the POR 

because their respective unaffiliated 

producers had knowledge of the final 

U.S. destination of the subject 

merchandise that they produced and 

sold to the resellers. The resellers 

provided sales documentation, such as 

invoices and packing lists from their 

unaffiliated suppliers, as well as 

accounting records as evidence in 

support of their claims.16 Commerce 

also issued supplemental questionnaires 

to both resellers requesting additional 

information regarding their respective 

statements of no sales or shipments. 

Based on the information provided by 

both resellers, we preliminarily 

determine that Wiresmith and Create 

Trading were not the first parties in the 

transaction chain to have knowledge 

that the subject merchandise was 

destined for the United States, and, 

thus, Wiresmith and Create Trading are 

not considered the exporters of subject 

merchandise during the POR for 

purposes of this review. Specifically, 

the record demonstrates that 

Wiresmith’s and Create Trading’s 

respective unaffiliated suppliers had 

knowledge that the steel nails they 

produced and sold to the resellers were 

destined for the United States. Thus, we 

preliminarily determine that Wiresmith 

and Create Trading had no shipments of 

subject merchandise during the POR. 

Commerce finds that, based on the 

clarification in the 2003 Assessment of 

Antidumping Duties 17 notice regarding 

the reseller policy, we will not rescind 

the review in these circumstances but, 

rather, complete the review with respect 

to the resellers and issue appropriate 

instructions to CBP after the completion 

of the review.18 Specifically, we 

preliminarily find it appropriate in this 

case to instruct CBP at the completion 

of the review to liquidate any existing 

entries of subject merchandise produced 

and exported by the resellers’ respective 

unaffiliated suppliers at the rate 

applicable to the unaffiliated producers, 

which, as discussed below, in this case 

is the all-others rate.19

Facts Available 

Pursuant to section 776(a) of the Act, 

Commerce is preliminarily relying upon 

facts otherwise available to assign 

estimated dumping margins to King 

Chuang, Liang Chyuan, and Liang Kai 

Co. because all three respondents were 

unresponsive to our requests for 

information, thereby withholding 

necessary information that was 

requested by Commerce, and 

significantly impeding the conduct of 

the review. Further, Commerce 

preliminarily determines that King 

Chuan, Liang Chyuan, and Liang Kai Co. 

failed to cooperate by not acting to the 

best of their ability to comply with 

requests for information and, thus, 

Commerce is applying an adverse 

inference in selecting among the facts 

available, in accordance with section 

776(b) of the Act. For a full description 

of the methodology underlying our 

conclusions regarding the application of 

adverse facts available, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

Rate for Non-Selected Companies 

The statute and Commerce’s 

regulations do not directly address the 

establishment of a rate to be applied to 

companies not selected for individual 

examination when Commerce limits its 

examination in an administrative review 

pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the 

Act. Commerce’s practice in calculating 

a rate for non-examined companies in 

cases involving limited selection based 

on exporters or producers accounting 

for the largest volumes of trade has been 

to look to section 735(c)(5) of the Act for 

guidance, which provides instructions 

for calculating the all-others rate in an 

investigation. In accordance with the 

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal 

Circuit’s decision in Albemarle,20 we 

are relying on the ‘‘expected method’’ 

pursuant to section 735(c)(5)(B) of the 

Act and the SAA,21 and, thus, are 

applying a review-specific rate based on 

the individual rates preliminarily 

applied to King Chuang, Liang Chyuan, 

and Liang Kai Co. in this administrative 

review (i.e., 78.17 percent) to the 

companies not selected for individual 

examination. For a detailed discussion, 

see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

Preliminary Results of Review 

We preliminarily determine that, for 

the period July 1, 2020, through June 30, 

2021, the following estimated dumping 

margins exist: 

Exporter/producer 

Dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

King Chuang Wen Trading Co., 

Ltd. .......................................... 78.17 

Liang Chyuan Industrial Co., 

Ltd./Integral Building Products 

Inc. .......................................... 78.17 

Liang Kai Co. .............................. 78.17 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 113 / Monday, June 13, 2022 / Notices 35737 

22See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). 

23See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1) and (2); see also 

Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service 

Requirements Due to COVID–19, 85 FR 17006 

(March 26, 2020). 

24See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2); see also 

Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service 

Requirements Due to COVID19; Extension of 

Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 

25See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

26 Id. 

27See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act; see also 19 

CFR 351.213(h). 

28See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘In Lieu of On-Site 

Verification Questionnaire,’’ dated May 2, 2022. 

29See, e.g., Shrimp from India; and Pasta from 

Turkey. 

30The all-others rate from the underlying 

investigation was revised in Certain Steel Nails 

from Taiwan: Notice of Court Decision Not in 

Harmony with Final Determination in Less than 

Fair Value Investigation and Notice of Amended 

Final Determination, 82 FR 55090, 55091 

(November 20, 2017). 

Exporter/producer 

Dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable 

to Companies Under Review Not Selected for Individual Examination 

See Appendix II for the 59 companies under review subject to 

the review-specific rate ........... 78.17 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

Normally, Commerce discloses the 

calculations performed in connection 

with preliminary results to interested 

parties within five days after the date of 

publication of this notice. Because 

Commerce preliminarily applied a rate 

based on total AFA to each of the 

mandatory respondents in this review, 

in accordance with section 776 of the 

Act, there are no calculations to 

disclose. 

Interested parties may submit case 

briefs no later than 30 days after the 

date of publication of this notice.22

Rebuttal briefs, the content of which is 

limited to the issues raised in the case 

briefs, must be filed within seven days 

from the deadline date for the 

submission of case briefs.23 Parties who 

submit case or rebuttal briefs in this 

proceeding are requested to submit with 

each argument: (1) a statement of the 

issue; (2) a brief summary of the 

argument; and (3) a table of 

authorities.24 Case and rebuttal briefs 

should be filed electronically via 

ACCESS. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing must submit a written request to 

the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance, filed electronically via 

ACCESS. An electronically-filed 

document must be received successfully 

in its entirety by ACCESS by 5 p.m. 

Eastern Time within 30 days after the 

date of publication of this notice.25

Hearing requests should contain: (1) the 

party’s name, address, and telephone 

number; (2) the number of participants; 

and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. 

Issues raised in the hearing will be 

limited to issues raised in the briefs. If 

a request for a hearing is made, 

Commerce intends to hold the hearing 

at a time and date to be determined.26

Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of this administrative review, 

including the results of its analysis 

raised in any written briefs, no later 

than 120 days after the publication of 

these preliminary results in the Federal 

Register, unless otherwise extended.27

Verification 

As provided in section 782(i)(3) of the 

Act, Commerce verified the information 

relied upon in making its preliminary 

results with respect to Create Trading. 

Normally, Commerce verifies 

information using standard procedures, 

including an on-site examination of 

original accounting, financial, and sales 

documentation. However, due to travel 

restrictions in response to the global 

COVID–19 pandemic, Commerce was 

unable to conduct on-site verification in 

this review. Accordingly, we chose to 

verify the information relied upon in 

making the preliminary results through 

alternative means in lieu of an on-site 

verification. Commerce issued a 

questionnaire in lieu of on-site 

verification to Create Trading.28

Assessment Rates 

Upon completion of the 

administrative review, Commerce shall 

determine, and CBP shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries covered by this review. For the 

companies for which we have rescinded 

this review, Commerce intends to 

instruct CBP to assess antidumping 

duties on all appropriate entries at a rate 

equal to the cash deposit rate of 

estimated antidumping duties required 

at the time of entry, or withdrawal from 

warehouse, for consumption, during the 

POR, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends to 

issue assessment instructions to CBP for 

the rescinded companies no earlier than 

35 days after the date of publication of 

the preliminary results of this 

administrative review in the Federal 

Register. 

If the preliminary results are 

unchanged for the final results, we will 

instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem 

assessment rate of 78.17 percent to all 

entries of subject merchandise during 

the POR which were produced and/or 

exported by King Chuang, Liang 

Chyuan, Liang Kai Co., and the 

companies which were not selected for 

individual examination. 

With respect to the four companies 

that certified they had no shipments, if 

we continue to find that they had no 

shipments of subject merchandise in the 

final results, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate any existing entries of subject 

merchandise produced by the four 

companies, but exported by other 

parties, at the rate for the intermediate 

reseller, if available, or at the all-others 

rate. 

With respect to the two resellers, 

Wiresmith and Create Trading, as 

discussed above, we preliminarily 

determine that the resellers were not the 

first parties in the transaction chain to 

have knowledge that the subject 

merchandise was destined for the 

United States, and thus the resellers are 

not considered the exporters of subject 

merchandise during the POR for 

purposes of this review. Consistent with 

the 2003 Assessment of Antidumping 

Duties notice and reseller policy, we 

find it appropriate in this case to 

instruct CBP to liquidate any existing 

entries of merchandise produced by the 

resellers’ unaffiliated producers and 

exported by the resellers at the rate 

applicable to the producer(s).29 Because 

none of the producer(s) have their own 

rates, we will instruct CBP to liquidate 

entries at the all-others rate from the 

investigation, as revised, of 2.16 

percent,30 in accordance with the 

reseller policy. 

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for all shipments 

of the subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the 

cash deposit rate for King Chuang, Liang 

Chyuan, and Liang Kai Co and the 

companies listed in Appendix II will be 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
35738 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 113 / Monday, June 13, 2022 / Notices 

31Commerce determined that Pro-Team and PT 

Enterprise comprise a single entity in Certain Steel 

Nails from Taiwan: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Partial Rescission of Administrative Review; 2015– 

2016, 82 FR 36744 (August 7, 2017), unchanged in 

Certain Steel Nails from Taiwan: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Partial Rescission of Administrative Review; 2015– 

2016, 83 FR 6163 (February 13, 2018). However, 

Commerce inadvertently listed them separately in 

the Initiation Notice, rather than as a combined 

single entity on a single line. 

32As noted above, PT Enterprise Inc. and Pro 

Team Coil Nail Enterprise Incor. comprise a single 

entity. Commerce inadvertently listed them 

separately in the Initiation Notice, rather than as a 

combined single entity on a single line. 

equal to the dumping margin 

established in the final results of this 

administrative review; (2) for previously 

reviewed or investigated companies not 

listed above, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding in 

which they were reviewed; (3) if the 

exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, a prior review, or in the 

investigation, but the producer is, then 

the cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding 

for the producer of the merchandise; 

and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 

manufacturers or exporters will 

continue to be 2.16 percent, the allothers rate. These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 

the reimbursement of antidumping 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this review 

period. Failure to comply with this 

requirement could result in Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 

sections 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1) and 

351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: June 7, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Discussion of the Methodology 

V. Recommendation 

Appendix II—List of Companies Under 

Review Not Selected for Individual 

Examination 

1. Acu-Transport Co., Ltd. 

2. Allwin Architectural Hardware Inc. 

3. Alsons Manufacturing India LLP 

4. An Chen Fa Machinery Co., Ltd. 

5. Bollore Logistics India Private Ltd. 

6. Bon Voyage Logistics Inc. 

7. Boss Precision Works Co., Ltd. 

8. C.H. Robinson Freight Services Ltd. 

9. C.H.Robinson World Wide India Pvt. Ltd. 

10. Casia Global Logistics Co., Ltd. 

11. Chief Ling Entreprise Co., Ltd 

12. China Intl. Freight Co., Ltd. 

13. China Sea Forwarders Co., Ltd. 

14. Crane Worldwide Logistics LLC 

15. De Well Container Shipping Inc. 

16. DHL Global Forwarding Sg. Pte. Ltd. 

17. Diversified Freight System Corporation 

18. Eusu Logistics Co., Ltd. 

19. Evergreen Logistics Corp. 

20. Everise Global Logistics Co., Ltd. 

21. Grandlink Logistics Co., Ltd. 

22. Honour Lane Logistics Company Ltd. 

23. Honour Lane Shipping Ltd. 

24. Houseware Taiwan Industries Ltd. 

25. Inmax Industries Sdn. Bhd. 

26. K.E. & Kingstone Co., Ltd. 

27. Kay Guay Entreprises Co., Ltd. 

28. Kerry Indev Logistics Private Limited 

29. King Compass Logistics Limited 

30. King Freight International Corp. 

31. Lien Bin Industries Co., Ltd. 

32. New Marine Consolidator Co., Ltd. 

33. NMC Logistics International Co., Ltd. 

34. Oceanlink/Topair International Co. 

35. OEC Freight Worldwide Co., Ltd. 

36. Orient Containers Sdn., Bhd. 

37. Orient Express Container Co., Ltd. 

38. Orient Star International Logistics Co., 

Ltd. 

39. Orient Star Transport International Ltd. 

40. Oriental Vanguard Logistics Co., Ltd. 

41. Pacific Concord International Ltd. 

42. Pacific Star Express Corp. 

43. Panda Logistics Co., Ltd. 

44. Ray Fu Entreprise Co., Ltd. 

45. SAR Transport Systems Pvt. Ltd. 

46. Schenker (H.K.) Ltd. 

47. Storeit Services LLP. 

48. Success Progress International Tran 

49. T.H.I. Logistics Co., Ltd. 

50. T.V.L. Container Line Limited 

51. The Ultimate Freight Management 

(Taiwan) Ltd. 

52. Topocean Consolidation Service (Taiwan) 

Ltd. 

53. Trans Luck Global Logistics Co., Ltd. 

54. Trans Wagon International Co., Ltd. 

55. Transwell Logistics Co., Ltd. 

56. Transworld Transportation Co., Ltd. 

57. UPS Supply Chain Solutions (Taiwan) 

Co., Ltd. 

58. Valuemax Products Co., Ltd. 

59. Worldwide Logistics Co., Ltd. 

Appendix III—Companies Rescinded 

From Review 

1. Aplus Pneumatic Corp. 

2. Bonuts Hardware Logistics Co., Ltd. 

3. Cheng CH International Co., Ltd. 

4. Chia Pao Metal Co., Ltd. 

5. China Staple Enterprise Corporation 

6. Chite Enterprises Co., Ltd. 

7. Crown Run Industrial Corp. 

8. De Fasteners Inc. 

9. Easylink Industrial Co., Ltd. 

10. Encore Green Co., Ltd. 

11. Faithful Engineering Products Co., Ltd. 

12. General Merchandise Consolidators, Inc. 

13. Hor Liang Industrial Corp. 

14. Hoyi Plus Co., Ltd. 

15. Interactive Corp. 

16. Jade Shuttle Enerprise Co., Ltd. 

17. Jau Yeou Industry Co., Ltd. 

18. JC Grand Corporation 

19. Jen Ju Enterprise Co., Ltd. 

20. Jet Crown International Co., Ltd. 

21. Jiajue Industrial Co., Ltd. 

22. Jinsco International Corp. 

23. Ko’s Nail Inc. 

24. Korea Wire Co., Ltd. 

25. Linkwell Industry Co., Ltd. 

26. Locksure Inc. 

27. Lu Kang Hand Tools Industrial Co., Ltd. 

28. Master United Corp. 

29. Maytrans International Corp. 

30. Ming Cheng Hardware Co., Ltd. 

31. Nailermate Enterprise Corporation 

32. Nailtech Co., Ltd. 

33. Newrex Screw Corporation 

34. Panther T&H Industry Co. 

35. Patek Tool Co., Ltd. 

36. Point Edge Corp. 

37. President Industrial Inc. 

38. Pro Team Coil Nail Enterprise Incor.31

39. PT Enterprise, Inc.32

40. Romp Coil Nail Industries Inc. 

41. Shinn Chuen Corp. 

42. Six2 Fastener Imports Inc. 

43. Taiwan Shan Yin International Co., Ltd. 

44. Taiwan Wakisangyo Co., Ltd. 

45. Techart Mechanical Corporation 

46. Test-Rite Int’l Co., Ltd. 

47. Theps Co., Ltd. 

48. Trans-Top Enterprise Co., Ltd. 

49. Trim International Inc. 

50. U-Can-Do Hardware Corp. 

51. UJL Industries Co., Ltd. 

52. Unicatch Industrial Co., Ltd. 

53. Vim International Entreprise Co., Ltd. 

54. Wattson Fastener Group Inc. 

55. Wictory Co., Ltd. 

56. Yehdyi Enterprise Co., Ltd. 

57. Yu Chi Hardware Co., Ltd. 

58. Zhishan Xing Entreprise Co., Ltd. 

59. Zon Mon Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2022–12711 Filed 6–10–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–423–813] 

Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts 

From Belgium: Notice of Initiation and 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Changed Circumstances Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES