[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 113 (Monday, June 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35734-35738]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12711]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-583-854]


Certain Steel Nails From Taiwan: Preliminary Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Preliminary Determination of No 
Shipments, and Partial Rescission of Review; 2020-2021

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce.


[[Page 35735]]


SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 
determines that certain steel nails from Taiwan were sold in the United 
States at less than normal value during the period of review (POR), 
July 1, 2020, through June 30, 2021. Interested parties are invited to 
comment on these preliminary results.

DATES: Applicable June 13, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irene Gorelik, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6905.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On July 13, 2015, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) published 
the antidumping duty (AD) order on certain steel nails (nails) from 
Taiwan.\1\ On July 1, 2021, Commerce published in the Federal Register 
a notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the 
Order.\2\ On July 30, 2021, Encore Green Co., Ltd. and Liang Kai Co. 
requested an administrative review.\3\ On July 30, 2021, Commerce 
received a request for an administrative review of 128 producers and/or 
exporters of subject merchandise, filed on behalf of Mid Continent 
Steel & Wire, Inc. (the petitioner).\4\ On August 2, 2021, Liang Chyuan 
Industrial Co., Ltd.\5\ requested an administrative review of 
itself.\6\ On September 7, 2021, we initiated an administrative review 
of certain steel nails from Taiwan covering all companies for which a 
review was requested in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff 
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i).\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Steel Nails from the Republic of Korea, 
Malaysia, the Sultanate of Oman, Taiwan, and the Socialist Republic 
of Vietnam: Antidumping Duty Orders, 80 FR 39994 (July 13, 2015) 
(Order).
    \2\ See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or 
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative 
Review, 86 FR 35065 (July 1, 2021).
    \3\ See Harris Bricken's Letter, ``Administrative Review 
Request,'' dated July 30, 2021.
    \4\ See Petitioner's Letter, ``Request for Administrative 
Reviews,'' dated July 30, 2021.
    \5\ Commerce determined that Liang Chyuan Industrial Co., Ltd. 
and Integral Building Products Inc. comprise a single entity in 
Certain Steel Nails from Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Review; 2017-2018, 84 FR 48116 (September 12, 
2019), unchanged in Certain Steel Nails from Taiwan: Final Results 
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Determination of No 
Shipments; 2017-2018, 85 FR 14635 (March 13, 2020). Because there is 
nothing on the record calling into question our prior finding, we 
continue to treat these companies as part of a single entity for 
this administrative review.
    \6\ See Appleton Luff's Letter, ``Administrative Review 
Request,'' dated August 2, 2021. Commerce's practice dictates that, 
where a deadline falls on a weekend or Federal holiday, the 
appropriate deadline is the next business day. See Notice of 
Clarification: Application of ``Next Business Day'' Rule for 
Administrative Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act of 
1930, As Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005). Therefore, this 
request for review was timely.
    \7\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 50034 (September 7, 2021) (Initiation 
Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On September 16, 2021, the petitioner filed a timely letter 
withdrawing its request for review of 61 of the 128 companies 
originally requested for review.\8\ On September 16, 2021, Encore Green 
Co., Ltd. and Liang Kai Co. also withdrew their requests for review.\9\ 
Further, while the petitioner withdrew its review request for Liang 
Chyuan Industrial Co., Ltd. and Integral Building Products, Inc., Liang 
Chyuan Industrial Co., Ltd. did not withdraw its request for review of 
itself.\10\ Therefore, we are not rescinding the review of: (1) the 
single entity comprising Liang Chyuan Industrial Co., Ltd. and Integral 
Building Products Inc.; or (2) Liang Kai Co., because active review 
requests remain on the record for them. We are rescinding the review 
with respect to the 59 companies \11\ for which all requests for review 
were timely withdrawn by interested parties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Petitioner's Letter, ``Withdrawal of Review Request,'' 
dated September 16, 2021.
    \9\ See Harris Bricken's Letter, ``Withdrawal of Request for 
Administrative Review,'' dated September 16, 2021. However, while 
Liang Kai Co. withdrew its request for review, the petitioner did 
not withdraw its review request for this company.
    \10\ Despite the petitioner's withdrawal of the sole review 
request with respect to Integral Building Products Inc., we do not 
intend to rescind the review with respect to this company because it 
is part of a single entity with Liang Chyuan Industrial Co., Ltd., 
for which a review request remains.
    \11\ See Appendix III.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On December 8, 2021, we selected King Chuang Wen Trading Co., Ltd. 
(King Chuang) and the single entity comprising Liang Chyuan Industrial 
Co., Ltd. and Integral Building Products Inc. (collectively, Liang 
Chyuan) as mandatory respondents in this administrative review.\12\ 
King Chuang and Liang Chyuan did not respond to the AD questionnaire. 
On January 12, 2022, we selected Liang Kai Co., as an additional 
mandatory respondent.\13\ Liang Kai Co. did not respond to the AD 
questionnaire.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Memorandum, ``Respondent Selection,'' dated December 8, 
2021.
    \13\ See Memorandum, ``Selection of Additional Mandatory 
Respondent,'' dated January 12, 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For a complete description of the events that followed the 
initiation of this administrative review, see the Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum.\14\ The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public 
document and is on file electronically via the Enforcement and 
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic 
Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at 
http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the 
internet at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain Steel 
Nails from Taiwan; 2020-2021,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby 
adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by this Order is certain steel nails from 
Taiwan. The certain steel nails subject to the Order are currently 
classifiable under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
(HTSUS) subheadings 7317.00.55.02, 7317.00.55.03, 7317.00.55.05, 
7317.00.55.07, 7317.00.55.08, 7317.00.55.11, 7317.00.55.18, 
7317.00.55.19, 7317.00.55.20, 7317.00.55.30, 7317.00.55.40, 
7317.00.55.50, 7317.00.55.60, 7317.00.55.70, 7317.00.55.80, 
7317.00.55.90, 7317.00.65.30, 7317.00.65.60 and 7317.00.75.00. Certain 
steel nails subject to this Order also may be classified under HTSUS 
subheadings 7907.00.60.00, 8206.00.00.00 or other HTSUS subheadings. 
Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and for customs 
purposes, the written product description, available in the Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum, remains dispositive.

Partial Rescission of Review

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), Commerce will rescind an 
administrative review, in whole or in part, if the party that requested 
the review withdraws its request within 90 days of the publication of 
the notice of initiation of the requested review. Because all requests 
for administrative review of the 59 companies listed in Appendix III 
were withdrawn by interested parties within 90 days of the date of 
publication of the Initiation Notice, and no other interested party 
requested a review of them, Commerce is rescinding this review with 
respect to these companies, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1).
    The administrative review remains active with respect to 69 
companies (including the two companies

[[Page 35736]]

comprising the single Liang Chyuan entity, but listed separately in the 
Initiation Notice).

Methodology

    Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 
751(a)(1)(B) of the Act. For a full description of the methodology 
underlying the preliminary results, see the Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum.

Preliminary Determination of No Shipments

    Commerce received no-shipment certifications from four companies: 
Astrotech Steels Private Limited, Geekay Wires Limited, Region 
Industries Co., Ltd., and Region System Sdn. Bhd. To confirm these 
companies' no-shipment claims, Commerce issued a no-shipment inquiry to 
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and received no contradictory 
information.\15\ Therefore, we preliminarily determine that these four 
companies did not have any shipments of subject merchandise during the 
POR. Consistent with Commerce's practice, we will not rescind the 
review with respect to these companies, but, rather, will complete the 
review and issue instructions based on the final results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See Memorandum, ``No Shipment Inquiry,'' dated January 21, 
2022, where CBP confirmed that ``CBP's Base Metals ran an ACE query 
. . . and found no entries by: Wiresmith, Astrotech Steels Private 
Limited Company; Geekay Wires Limited; Region System, or Region 
System Sdn. Bhd.; Region Industries, or Region Industries Co., Ltd. 
. . .''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, Wiresmith Industrial Co., Ltd. (Wiresmith) and Create 
Trading Co., Ltd. (Create Trading) are resellers of subject merchandise 
that reported that they had no reviewable sales or shipments during the 
POR because their respective unaffiliated producers had knowledge of 
the final U.S. destination of the subject merchandise that they 
produced and sold to the resellers. The resellers provided sales 
documentation, such as invoices and packing lists from their 
unaffiliated suppliers, as well as accounting records as evidence in 
support of their claims.\16\ Commerce also issued supplemental 
questionnaires to both resellers requesting additional information 
regarding their respective statements of no sales or shipments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See Create Trading Letter, ``Statement of No Sales to the 
United States,'' dated October 7, 2021; see also Wiresmith Letter, 
``Statement of No Sales to the United States,'' dated October 7, 
2021 (Wiresmith SNS).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Based on the information provided by both resellers, we 
preliminarily determine that Wiresmith and Create Trading were not the 
first parties in the transaction chain to have knowledge that the 
subject merchandise was destined for the United States, and, thus, 
Wiresmith and Create Trading are not considered the exporters of 
subject merchandise during the POR for purposes of this review. 
Specifically, the record demonstrates that Wiresmith's and Create 
Trading's respective unaffiliated suppliers had knowledge that the 
steel nails they produced and sold to the resellers were destined for 
the United States. Thus, we preliminarily determine that Wiresmith and 
Create Trading had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR.
    Commerce finds that, based on the clarification in the 2003 
Assessment of Antidumping Duties \17\ notice regarding the reseller 
policy, we will not rescind the review in these circumstances but, 
rather, complete the review with respect to the resellers and issue 
appropriate instructions to CBP after the completion of the review.\18\ 
Specifically, we preliminarily find it appropriate in this case to 
instruct CBP at the completion of the review to liquidate any existing 
entries of subject merchandise produced and exported by the resellers' 
respective unaffiliated suppliers at the rate applicable to the 
unaffiliated producers, which, as discussed below, in this case is the 
all-others rate.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) 
(Assessment of Antidumping Duties).
    \18\ Id.
    \19\ See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India: 
Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 73 FR 
77610, 77612 (December 19, 2008) (Shrimp from India); Certain Pasta 
from Turkey: Notice of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review, 76 FR 23974, 23977 (April 29, 2011), 
unchanged in Pasta from Turkey: Notice of Final Results of the 14th 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 68399 (November 4, 
2011) (Pasta from Turkey).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Facts Available

    Pursuant to section 776(a) of the Act, Commerce is preliminarily 
relying upon facts otherwise available to assign estimated dumping 
margins to King Chuang, Liang Chyuan, and Liang Kai Co. because all 
three respondents were unresponsive to our requests for information, 
thereby withholding necessary information that was requested by 
Commerce, and significantly impeding the conduct of the review. 
Further, Commerce preliminarily determines that King Chuan, Liang 
Chyuan, and Liang Kai Co. failed to cooperate by not acting to the best 
of their ability to comply with requests for information and, thus, 
Commerce is applying an adverse inference in selecting among the facts 
available, in accordance with section 776(b) of the Act. For a full 
description of the methodology underlying our conclusions regarding the 
application of adverse facts available, see the Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum.

Rate for Non-Selected Companies

    The statute and Commerce's regulations do not directly address the 
establishment of a rate to be applied to companies not selected for 
individual examination when Commerce limits its examination in an 
administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. 
Commerce's practice in calculating a rate for non-examined companies in 
cases involving limited selection based on exporters or producers 
accounting for the largest volumes of trade has been to look to section 
735(c)(5) of the Act for guidance, which provides instructions for 
calculating the all-others rate in an investigation. In accordance with 
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's decision in 
Albemarle,\20\ we are relying on the ``expected method'' pursuant to 
section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act and the SAA,\21\ and, thus, are 
applying a review-specific rate based on the individual rates 
preliminarily applied to King Chuang, Liang Chyuan, and Liang Kai Co. 
in this administrative review (i.e., 78.17 percent) to the companies 
not selected for individual examination. For a detailed discussion, see 
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ See Albemarle Corp. v. United States, 821 F.3d 1345 (Fed. 
Cir. 2016) (Albemarle).
    \21\ See Statement of Administrative Action Accompanying the 
Uruguay Round Agreements Act, H.R. Rep. No. 103-316, Vol. 1 (1994) 
(SAA) at 873 (when ``the dumping margins for all of the exporters 
and producers that are individually investigated are determined 
entirely on the basis of the facts available or are zero or de 
minimis . . . {t{time} he expected method in such cases will be to 
weight-average the zero and the de minimis margins and margins 
determined pursuant to the facts available.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preliminary Results of Review

    We preliminarily determine that, for the period July 1, 2020, 
through June 30, 2021, the following estimated dumping margins exist:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Dumping
                      Exporter/producer                         margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
King Chuang Wen Trading Co., Ltd............................       78.17
Liang Chyuan Industrial Co., Ltd./Integral Building Products       78.17
 Inc........................................................
Liang Kai Co................................................       78.17
------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 35737]]


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Dumping
                      Exporter/producer                         margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to Companies Under Review Not
                   Selected for Individual Examination
------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Appendix II for the 59 companies under review subject to       78.17
 the review-specific rate...................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure and Public Comment

    Normally, Commerce discloses the calculations performed in 
connection with preliminary results to interested parties within five 
days after the date of publication of this notice. Because Commerce 
preliminarily applied a rate based on total AFA to each of the 
mandatory respondents in this review, in accordance with section 776 of 
the Act, there are no calculations to disclose.
    Interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 30 days 
after the date of publication of this notice.\22\ Rebuttal briefs, the 
content of which is limited to the issues raised in the case briefs, 
must be filed within seven days from the deadline date for the 
submission of case briefs.\23\ Parties who submit case or rebuttal 
briefs in this proceeding are requested to submit with each argument: 
(1) a statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and 
(3) a table of authorities.\24\ Case and rebuttal briefs should be 
filed electronically via ACCESS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii).
    \23\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1) and (2); see also Temporary Rule 
Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID-19, 85 FR 17006 
(March 26, 2020).
    \24\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2); see also Temporary 
Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID19; Extension 
of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to 
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant 
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via 
ACCESS. An electronically-filed document must be received successfully 
in its entirety by ACCESS by 5 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after 
the date of publication of this notice.\25\ Hearing requests should 
contain: (1) the party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the 
number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. 
Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to issues raised in the 
briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, Commerce intends to hold 
the hearing at a time and date to be determined.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
    \26\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce intends to issue the final results of this administrative 
review, including the results of its analysis raised in any written 
briefs, no later than 120 days after the publication of these 
preliminary results in the Federal Register, unless otherwise 
extended.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act; see also 19 CFR 
351.213(h).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Verification

    As provided in section 782(i)(3) of the Act, Commerce verified the 
information relied upon in making its preliminary results with respect 
to Create Trading. Normally, Commerce verifies information using 
standard procedures, including an on-site examination of original 
accounting, financial, and sales documentation. However, due to travel 
restrictions in response to the global COVID-19 pandemic, Commerce was 
unable to conduct on-site verification in this review. Accordingly, we 
chose to verify the information relied upon in making the preliminary 
results through alternative means in lieu of an on-site verification. 
Commerce issued a questionnaire in lieu of on-site verification to 
Create Trading.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ See Commerce's Letter, ``In Lieu of On-Site Verification 
Questionnaire,'' dated May 2, 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    Upon completion of the administrative review, Commerce shall 
determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate 
entries covered by this review. For the companies for which we have 
rescinded this review, Commerce intends to instruct CBP to assess 
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries at a rate equal to the 
cash deposit rate of estimated antidumping duties required at the time 
of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, during the 
POR, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends to 
issue assessment instructions to CBP for the rescinded companies no 
earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the preliminary 
results of this administrative review in the Federal Register.
    If the preliminary results are unchanged for the final results, we 
will instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem assessment rate of 78.17 
percent to all entries of subject merchandise during the POR which were 
produced and/or exported by King Chuang, Liang Chyuan, Liang Kai Co., 
and the companies which were not selected for individual examination.
    With respect to the four companies that certified they had no 
shipments, if we continue to find that they had no shipments of subject 
merchandise in the final results, we will instruct CBP to liquidate any 
existing entries of subject merchandise produced by the four companies, 
but exported by other parties, at the rate for the intermediate 
reseller, if available, or at the all-others rate.
    With respect to the two resellers, Wiresmith and Create Trading, as 
discussed above, we preliminarily determine that the resellers were not 
the first parties in the transaction chain to have knowledge that the 
subject merchandise was destined for the United States, and thus the 
resellers are not considered the exporters of subject merchandise 
during the POR for purposes of this review. Consistent with the 2003 
Assessment of Antidumping Duties notice and reseller policy, we find it 
appropriate in this case to instruct CBP to liquidate any existing 
entries of merchandise produced by the resellers' unaffiliated 
producers and exported by the resellers at the rate applicable to the 
producer(s).\29\ Because none of the producer(s) have their own rates, 
we will instruct CBP to liquidate entries at the all-others rate from 
the investigation, as revised, of 2.16 percent,\30\ in accordance with 
the reseller policy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ See, e.g., Shrimp from India; and Pasta from Turkey.
    \30\ The all-others rate from the underlying investigation was 
revised in Certain Steel Nails from Taiwan: Notice of Court Decision 
Not in Harmony with Final Determination in Less than Fair Value 
Investigation and Notice of Amended Final Determination, 82 FR 
55090, 55091 (November 20, 2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier 
than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this 
review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the 
U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will 
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties 
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 
90 days of publication).

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the 
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for King Chuang, 
Liang Chyuan, and Liang Kai Co and the companies listed in Appendix II 
will be

[[Page 35738]]

equal to the dumping margin established in the final results of this 
administrative review; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated 
companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be 
the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed 
segment of this proceeding in which they were reviewed; (3) if the 
exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or in 
the investigation, but the producer is, then the cash deposit rate will 
be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this 
proceeding for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash 
deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to 
be 2.16 percent, the all-others rate. These cash deposit requirements, 
when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of 
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and sections 19 CFR 
351.213(h)(1) and 351.221(b)(4).

    Dated: June 7, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix I--List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Methodology
V. Recommendation

Appendix II--List of Companies Under Review Not Selected for Individual 
Examination

1. Acu-Transport Co., Ltd.
2. Allwin Architectural Hardware Inc.
3. Alsons Manufacturing India LLP
4. An Chen Fa Machinery Co., Ltd.
5. Bollore Logistics India Private Ltd.
6. Bon Voyage Logistics Inc.
7. Boss Precision Works Co., Ltd.
8. C.H. Robinson Freight Services Ltd.
9. C.H.Robinson World Wide India Pvt. Ltd.
10. Casia Global Logistics Co., Ltd.
11. Chief Ling Entreprise Co., Ltd
12. China Intl. Freight Co., Ltd.
13. China Sea Forwarders Co., Ltd.
14. Crane Worldwide Logistics LLC
15. De Well Container Shipping Inc.
16. DHL Global Forwarding Sg. Pte. Ltd.
17. Diversified Freight System Corporation
18. Eusu Logistics Co., Ltd.
19. Evergreen Logistics Corp.
20. Everise Global Logistics Co., Ltd.
21. Grandlink Logistics Co., Ltd.
22. Honour Lane Logistics Company Ltd.
23. Honour Lane Shipping Ltd.
24. Houseware Taiwan Industries Ltd.
25. Inmax Industries Sdn. Bhd.
26. K.E. & Kingstone Co., Ltd.
27. Kay Guay Entreprises Co., Ltd.
28. Kerry Indev Logistics Private Limited
29. King Compass Logistics Limited
30. King Freight International Corp.
31. Lien Bin Industries Co., Ltd.
32. New Marine Consolidator Co., Ltd.
33. NMC Logistics International Co., Ltd.
34. Oceanlink/Topair International Co.
35. OEC Freight Worldwide Co., Ltd.
36. Orient Containers Sdn., Bhd.
37. Orient Express Container Co., Ltd.
38. Orient Star International Logistics Co., Ltd.
39. Orient Star Transport International Ltd.
40. Oriental Vanguard Logistics Co., Ltd.
41. Pacific Concord International Ltd.
42. Pacific Star Express Corp.
43. Panda Logistics Co., Ltd.
44. Ray Fu Entreprise Co., Ltd.
45. SAR Transport Systems Pvt. Ltd.
46. Schenker (H.K.) Ltd.
47. Storeit Services LLP.
48. Success Progress International Tran
49. T.H.I. Logistics Co., Ltd.
50. T.V.L. Container Line Limited
51. The Ultimate Freight Management (Taiwan) Ltd.
52. Topocean Consolidation Service (Taiwan) Ltd.
53. Trans Luck Global Logistics Co., Ltd.
54. Trans Wagon International Co., Ltd.
55. Transwell Logistics Co., Ltd.
56. Transworld Transportation Co., Ltd.
57. UPS Supply Chain Solutions (Taiwan) Co., Ltd.
58. Valuemax Products Co., Ltd.
59. Worldwide Logistics Co., Ltd.

Appendix III--Companies Rescinded From Review

1. Aplus Pneumatic Corp.
2. Bonuts Hardware Logistics Co., Ltd.
3. Cheng CH International Co., Ltd.
4. Chia Pao Metal Co., Ltd.
5. China Staple Enterprise Corporation
6. Chite Enterprises Co., Ltd.
7. Crown Run Industrial Corp.
8. De Fasteners Inc.
9. Easylink Industrial Co., Ltd.
10. Encore Green Co., Ltd.
11. Faithful Engineering Products Co., Ltd.
12. General Merchandise Consolidators, Inc.
13. Hor Liang Industrial Corp.
14. Hoyi Plus Co., Ltd.
15. Interactive Corp.
16. Jade Shuttle Enerprise Co., Ltd.
17. Jau Yeou Industry Co., Ltd.
18. JC Grand Corporation
19. Jen Ju Enterprise Co., Ltd.
20. Jet Crown International Co., Ltd.
21. Jiajue Industrial Co., Ltd.
22. Jinsco International Corp.
23. Ko's Nail Inc.
24. Korea Wire Co., Ltd.
25. Linkwell Industry Co., Ltd.
26. Locksure Inc.
27. Lu Kang Hand Tools Industrial Co., Ltd.
28. Master United Corp.
29. Maytrans International Corp.
30. Ming Cheng Hardware Co., Ltd.
31. Nailermate Enterprise Corporation
32. Nailtech Co., Ltd.
33. Newrex Screw Corporation
34. Panther T&H Industry Co.
35. Patek Tool Co., Ltd.
36. Point Edge Corp.
37. President Industrial Inc.
38. Pro Team Coil Nail Enterprise Incor.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ Commerce determined that Pro-Team and PT Enterprise 
comprise a single entity in Certain Steel Nails from Taiwan: 
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 
Partial Rescission of Administrative Review; 2015-2016, 82 FR 36744 
(August 7, 2017), unchanged in Certain Steel Nails from Taiwan: 
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Partial 
Rescission of Administrative Review; 2015-2016, 83 FR 6163 (February 
13, 2018). However, Commerce inadvertently listed them separately in 
the Initiation Notice, rather than as a combined single entity on a 
single line.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

39. PT Enterprise, Inc.\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ As noted above, PT Enterprise Inc. and Pro Team Coil Nail 
Enterprise Incor. comprise a single entity. Commerce inadvertently 
listed them separately in the Initiation Notice, rather than as a 
combined single entity on a single line.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

40. Romp Coil Nail Industries Inc.
41. Shinn Chuen Corp.
42. Six2 Fastener Imports Inc.
43. Taiwan Shan Yin International Co., Ltd.
44. Taiwan Wakisangyo Co., Ltd.
45. Techart Mechanical Corporation
46. Test-Rite Int'l Co., Ltd.
47. Theps Co., Ltd.
48. Trans-Top Enterprise Co., Ltd.
49. Trim International Inc.
50. U-Can-Do Hardware Corp.
51. UJL Industries Co., Ltd.
52. Unicatch Industrial Co., Ltd.
53. Vim International Entreprise Co., Ltd.
54. Wattson Fastener Group Inc.
55. Wictory Co., Ltd.
56. Yehdyi Enterprise Co., Ltd.
57. Yu Chi Hardware Co., Ltd.
58. Zhishan Xing Entreprise Co., Ltd.
59. Zon Mon Co., Ltd.

[FR Doc. 2022-12711 Filed 6-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P