alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Clive Barwin, certify that:
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Melt Inc.; |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------|

2.            Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.            Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.             I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and I have:

a)             designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)            evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c)             disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

5.             I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)             all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)            any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Dated:  March 29, 2007

 

 

/s/ Clive Barwin                                                                            

Clive Barwin, President, CEO and Secretary 

(Principal Executive Officer)
Independent Auditors' Report


The Board of Trustees of
Greenwich Street Series Fund:

In planning and performing our audits of the financial statements of
Appreciation Portfolio, Total Return Portfolio, Intermediate High Grade
Portfolio, Money Market Portfolio, Diversified Strategic Income Portfolio,
Equity Income Portfolio, Equity Index Portfolio, Growth and Income Portfolio,
Emerging Growth Portfolio and International Equity Portfolio of Greenwich
Street Series Fund (the "Fund") for the year ended December 31, 2000, we
considered its internal control, including control activities for safeguarding
securities, in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of
expressing our opinion on the financial statements and to comply with the
requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and maintaining
internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments
by management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs
of controls.  Generally, controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the
entity's objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. Those controls include the
safeguarding of assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, error or fraud may occur
and not be detected.  Also, projection of any evaluation of internal control
to future periods is subject to the risk that it may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily disclose all
matters in internal control that might be material weaknesses under standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A
material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of one or
more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low
level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in amounts that
would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited may
occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal
course of performing their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters
involving internal control and its operation, including controls for
safeguarding securities, that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined
above as of December 31, 2000.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of management, the
Board of Trustees of the Fund, and the Securities and Exchange Commission and
is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these
specified parties.


February 9, 2001
Reinaldo VASQUEZ-RIVERA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8065.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 12002E027

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version) - Part Three: Community policies - Title I: Free movement of goods - Chapter 1: The customs union - Article 27 - Article 29 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - Article 29 - EEC Treaty***Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0047 - 0047 Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0188 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0015 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available)*

Treaty establishing the European Community (Nice consolidated version)

Part Three: Community policies

Title I: Free movement of goods

Chapter 1: The customs union

Article 27

Article 29 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version)

Article 29 - EEC Treaty

Article 27

In carrying out the tasks entrusted to it under this chapter the Commission shall be guided by:

(a) the need to promote trade between Member States and third countries;

(b) developments in conditions of competition within the Community in so far as they lead to an improvement in the competitive capacity of undertakings;

(c) the requirements of the Community as regards the supply of raw materials and semi-finished goods; in this connection the Commission shall take care to avoid distorting conditions of competition between Member States in respect of finished goods;

(d) the need to avoid serious disturbances in the economies of Member States and to ensure rational development of production and an expansion of consumption within the Community.
Order entered February 9 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 01626
- CR MARK EDWIN GUIDA, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Cou rt Cause No. F12
- 63747
- V



### O RDER
The Court GRANTS the January 29, 2015 motion of Lori Ordiway to withdraw as appellant’s counsel. We DIRECT the Clerk to remove Lori Ordiway as appellant’s appointed attorney of record.
We ORDER the trial court to appoint n ew counsel to represent appellant and to transmit to this Court, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, the order appointing new
counsel.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the Honorable Brandon Birming ham, Presiding Judge, 292nd Judicial District Court; Felicia Pitre, Dallas County District Clerk; Lori Ordiway; and the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office.We ABATE the appeal to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal

shall be r einstated fifteen days from the date of this order or when the order appointing new
counsel is received.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Dennis G. McLaughlin, III, Chief Executive Officerof Earth Biofuels, Inc.(the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB ofthe Company for the six months ended June 30, 2006 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.
| Date: November 20, 2006 |                          |   |
|------------------------------|-------------------------------|--------|
|                         |                          |   |
|                              | /s/ Dennis G. McLaughlin, III |   |
|                         | Dennis G. McLaughlin, III     |   |
|                         | Chief Executive Officer       |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

 

----
Alfred Risien HAMMAN, Petitioner v. UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES.

No. 19-420

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018418EN.01000801.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 19.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 418/8 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9139 — Haier/Candy)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 418/07)

1.

On 8 November 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018418EN.01000801-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Haier Europe Appliances Holding B.V (the Netherlands), controlled by Qingdao Haier Co. Ltd (‘Haier’, China) |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Candy S.p.A (‘Candy’, Italy) |

Haier acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Candy.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Haier: manufacture and supply of consumer electronics and domestic appliances worldwide marketed through several main brands, including ‘Haier’, ‘Casarte’, ‘GE Appliances’, ‘Fisher & Paykel’, ‘AQUA’ and ‘Leader’.

—   for Candy: manufacture and supply of domestic appliances worldwide marketed through two main brands, ‘Candy’ and ‘Hoover’, and through national brands such as ‘Rosières’ (France) and ‘Jinling’ (China).

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9139 — Haier/Candy

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018418EN.01000801-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                  Subsidiaries of ACT Teleconferencing, Inc.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                      Jurisdiction of
                                      Name                                             Incorporation
                                      ----                                            ---------------
<S>                                                                                  <C>
ACT Teleconferencing Services, Inc., formerly ACT Capital, Inc.                        Minnesota, USA

ACT VideoConferencing, Inc., formerly NBS, Inc.                                        Minnesota, USA

ACT Research, Inc.                                                                     Colorado, USA

ACT Teleconferencing Canada Inc.                                                           Canada

ACT Teleconferencing Limited (formerly 60% owned but 100% owned as of January          United Kingdom
  17, 2001)

ACT Business Solutions Limited, formerly Multimedia and Teleconferencing               United Kingdom
  Services Limited (96.7% owned)

ACT Teleconferencing France SA                                                             France

ACT Teleconferencing GmbH                                                                 Germany

ACT Teleconferencing BV                                                                 Netherlands

ACT Teleconferencing Belgium SA                                                           Belgium

ACT Teleconferencing (Pty) Limited                                                       Australia

ACT Teleconferencing Hong Kong Limited                                                   Hong Kong

ACT Teleconferencing of Bermuda Limited                                                   Bermuda
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 102 (Thursday, May 26, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 32013]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11332]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP22-696-000.
    Applicants: Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC.
    Description: Refund Report: TPC 2022 Annual L&U Cash-Out Refund 
Report to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 5/19/22.
    Accession Number: 20220519-5141.
    Comment Date: 5 pm ET 5/31/22.

    Any person desiring to protest in any the above proceedings must 
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18 
CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified 
comment date.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: May 20, 2022.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-11332 Filed 5-25-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT DAVID C HAVEZ, Pe titione r, v. LOR ETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 11-73977 Age n c y No. A070-911-147 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for R e vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d August 3, 2015 ** Pa sa de n a , C a l ifornia B e fore : D.W . NELSON, SILVER M AN, a nd WA RDLAW , C irc uit Judge s. David C have z , a

native and c itiz e n of M e xic o, pe titions for re vie w of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a l s’ s (B IA) de c ision dism i ssing his a

ppe a l from

an Im m i gra tion Judge ’ s (IJ) orde r of re m ova l. W e have jurisdic tion pursua nt to 8 U.S.C . § 1252(a )(2)(D), and we grant the pe tition. 

# FIL ED AUG 06 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public a t ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).The B IA e rre d a s a m a tte r of la

w whe n it a

p plie d the m o difie d c ate goric a l a pproa c h to c onc l ude tha

t C have z ’ s c onvic tion for pe tty the ft with priors in viola tion of C a lifornia

Pe na l C ode §§ 484(a ) and 666 c onstitute d a n a ggrava te d fe lony the ft offe nse . Se e 8 U . S.C . §§ 1101(a )(43)(G); 1227(a )(2)(A)(iii). C a lifornia la w doe s not re quire the jury to una nim ously a gre e a s to whic h of the disjunc tive ly

worde d form s of the ft se t forth in § 484(a ) is the ba sis for the de fe nda n t’ s c onvic tion. Se e Pe oplev . Fe nde rson , 116 C a l. R p tr. 3d 17, 27 (C a l. C t. App. 2010); Pe oplev . Mc Le more , 32 C a l. R

ptr. 2d 687, 689 (C a l. C t. App. 1994). As a

re sult, thesta

tute is not divisible and the m odifie d c a te g oric a l a pproa c h is ina pplic a ble . Se e De

sc amps v . Unite d State

s , 133 S. C t. 2276, 2282, 2285 (2013); Re ndon v . Holde r , 764 F.3d 1077, 1081, 1086 (9th C ir. 2014). B e c a use the m odifie d c a te goric a l a pproa c h doe s not a

pply and “ a pe tty the ft c onvic tion, unde r C a l. Pe na l C ode §§ 484(a ) and 666, is not a c a te goric a l m a tc h to the fe de ra l de finition of a the ft offe nse ,” Unite d

State s v . Riv e ra , 658 F.3d 1073, 1077 (9th C ir. 2011), the B IA e rre d whe n it c o nc lude d tha t C have z wa s re m ova

ble a s c h arge d unde r 8 U.S.C . §§ 1101(a )(43)(G) a nd 1227(a )(2)(A)(iii).

2Pe tition G r ante d.

3
Heather ROGERO, et vir, Petitioners v. Alex M. AZAR, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services

No. 19-5657

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Randall TURNER, Petitioner v. TENNESSEE.

No. 19-5792

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Tennessee, Eastern Division denied.
Roy L. PERRY-BEY, et al., Applicants, v. CITY OF NORFOLK, VIRGINIA, et al.

No. 19A1021.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 26, 2020

Application for stay addressed to Justice Sotomayor and referred to the Court denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1054 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1054

        To suspend temporarily the duty on Disperse Yellow 114.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2013

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on Disperse Yellow 114.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISPERSE YELLOW 114.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Disperse Yellow     Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          114 (CAS No.                                                      12/31/2016
                          59312-61-7)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3204.11.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 17, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, February 17, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16D0241. ISRAEL RADDER v. LADASHA RADDER.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

15CV11970
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 11/25/14          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      369,744
COMMITMENTS
 130,143  150,865  104,147  113,962   85,172  348,252  340,184   21,492   29,560

CHANGES FROM 11/18/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -15,719)
  17,712   25,619  -12,958  -20,067  -26,484  -15,313  -13,823     -406   -1,896

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    35.2     40.8     28.2     30.8     23.0     94.2     92.0      5.8      8.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      183)
      49       80       74       36       33      134      151
```

----

Updated November 29, 2014