alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(logo) CWCapital 

ASSETMANAGEMENT

 

 

**Annual Compliance Statement**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

For the Period of February 27, 2018 to December 31,2018

 

Benchmark 2018-B2 Mortgage Trust,

Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through

Certificates Series 2018-B2 (the “Trust”)

 

 

I, James P. Shevlin, on behalfof CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer (the “CertifyingServicer”), certify to J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage SecuritiesCorp. and its officers, directors and with the knowledge and intent that they willrely upon this certification, that:

 

1.       I (or Servicing Officers under mysupervision) have reviewed the Certifying Servicer’s activities betweenFebruary 27, 2018 to December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”) and theCertifying Servicer’s performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement;and

 

2.       To the best of my knowledge, based on suchreview, the Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under thePooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects during the ReportingPeriod.

 

 

Date: March 1, 2019

 

CWCapital Asset ManagementLLC, as Special Servicer

 

By: /s/ James P Shevlin

Name: James P. Shevlin

Title: President/ChiefOperating Officer

 

 

7501 Wisconsin Avenue | Suite500 West | Bethesda, MD | 20814
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

JUL 1 1998

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

EDWARD RICHARD NEWTON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

LADON MOTEN, Individually and

as a Police Officer in the New Mexico

State Police Department; NEIL

MERTZ, Individually and as Chief

Deputy District Attorney for the

County of Socorro; JEFF LAHANN,

Individually and as Senior Trial

Prosecutor for the County of Socorro,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 97-2212

(D.C. No. CIV-93-994-JP)

(D. N.M.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before BALDOCK , EBEL , and MURPHY , Circuit Judges.
-2-

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore

ordered submitted without oral argument.

Plaintiff seeks leave to appeal in forma pauperis the district court’s denial

of his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion, which sought to set aside the court’s

dismissal of his civil rights action. Plaintiff, who was incarcerated, instituted the

underlying action under a false name and then failed to prosecute the action after

escaping from prison. The district court subsequently granted defendants’ motion

to dismiss, which was based on improper service, failure to prosecute, and Rule

11 violations. Almost three years later, plaintiff filed the present Rule 60(b)

motion, in which he acknowledged that he had filed the complaint under a false

name and explained that he had been unable to prosecute the action after his

escape because he was hiding from authorities. The district court denied the Rule

60(b) motion, finding both that it was not filed within a reasonable time and that

it was without merit.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), this court “shall dismiss the case

at any time if the court determines that . . . the action or appeal is frivolous or

malicious.” Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude that

the present appeal is frivolous. Therefore, plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma
-3-

pauperis is DENIED and the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. Because this

appeal is frivolous under § 1915(e)(2)(B), it counts as a “prior occasion[]” under

28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff is hereby notified that three filings of cases that

are dismissed or affirmed on the basis that they are frivolous or fail to state a

claim under § 1915(g) will result in him being unable to proceed in forma

pauperis under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

Entered for the Court

Bobby R. Baldock

Circuit Judge
Steven Jacob SEIBERT, Petitioner v. Antoine CALDWELL, Warden.

No. 18-9435

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  each of the  undersigned  officers  of  GreenShift
Corporation (the "Company"), certifies that:

1.   The Quarterly  Report on Form 10Q of the Company for the period ended March
     31, 2009 (the  "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or
     78o(d)); and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




                                /S/      KEVIN KREISLER
                                ---------------------------------
Dated :  May  20, 2008                   KEVIN KREISLER
                                         Chief Executive Officer

                                /S/      EDWARD R. CARROLL
                                ---------------------------------
                                         EDWARD R. CARROLL
                                         Chief Financial Officer


This  certification  is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,
subject  to the  knowledge  standard  contained  therein,  and not for any other
purpose.
Carlos ORTIZ, Petitioner, v. DELAWARE

No. 19-5039

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Delaware denied.
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 120 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Approving the location of a memorial to commemorate the 

more than 5,000 slaves and free Black persons who 

fought for independence in the American Revolution. 

Whereas section 8908(b)(1) of title 40, United States Code, 

provides that the location of a commemorative work in 

Area I, as depicted on the map entitled ‘‘Commemorative 

Areas Washington, DC and Environs’’, 
2 

•HJ 120 EH 

numbered 869/86501 B, and dated June 24, 2003, shall 

be deemed to be authorized only if a recommendation for 

that location is approved by law not later than 150 calendar days after Congress is notified of the recommendation; 

Whereas section 2860 of Public Law 112–239 (40 U.S.C. 

8903 note) authorized the National Mall Liberty Fund 

D.C. to establish a memorial on Federal land in Area I 

or Area II, as depicted on such map, to honor the more 

than 5,000 slaves and free Black persons who fought for 

American independence in the Revolutionary War; and 

Whereas the Administrator of General Services has notified 

Congress of the Administrator’s determination that such 

memorial should be located in Area I: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the location of a commemorative work to honor the 

4 more than 5,000 slaves and free Black persons who fought 

5 in the American Revolution, authorized by section 2860 

6 of division B of Public Law 112–239 (40 U.S.C. 8903 

7 note), within Area I as described on the map entitled 

8 ‘‘Commemorative Areas Washington, DC and Environs’’, 
3 

•HJ 120 EH 

1 numbered 869/86501 B and dated June 24, 2003, is ap2 proved. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 8, 

2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 120 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Approving the location of a memorial to commemoAmerican Revolution. persons who fought for independence in the rate the more than 5,000 slaves and free Black
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

Plaintiff, '

'

versus ' NO. 1:24-CR-2

'

JOSE ANTONIO SALAS-BENITEZ, '

'

Defendant. '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Hawthorn conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed 

by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued his Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. The magistrate 

judge recommended that the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. He further 

recommended that the court adjudge the Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed 

against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to the magistrate judge’s findings. The court ORDERS 

that the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate 

Judge are ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the 

plea agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Jose Antonio Salas-Benitez, is 

Case 1:24-cr-00002-MAC-ZJH Document 23 Filed 06/07/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 57
2

adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a)

(Reentry of a Deported Alien).

Signed this date

Jun 7, 2024

Case 1:24-cr-00002-MAC-ZJH Document 23 Filed 06/07/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 58
EX-32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CEO
                                                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                    SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In  connection  with the annual report of Azul Studios  International  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form  l0-QSB for the quarter  ended  December , 31,  2005,  James
Vandeberg,  Chief  Financial  Officer  hereby  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the SARBANES - OXLEY Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1. The quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

2. The information  contained in the quarterly  report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



Date: June 23, 2006
                              By: James Vandeberg, Chief Financial Officer
                                  ---------------
# C_2018048EN.01000102.xml

| 9.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8774 — Ivanhoe Cambridge/QuadReal Property Group/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 48/02)

On 5 February 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8774. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8774. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1052 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1052

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Disperse Red 167:1.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2013

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Disperse Red 167:1.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISPERSE RED 167:1.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.03.47 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Disperse Red 167:1) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2016''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Chester Ray CRANK, Petitioner, v. Charmaine BRACY, Warden.

No. 19-5065

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF PERIODICREPORT**        I,Darren L. Miles, Chief Financial Officer of Earth Biofuels, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:        (1)        the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2007 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and        (2)        the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.    Date: June 13, 2007    /s/ Darren L. Miles  Darren L. Miles
# C_2017087EN.01000901.xml

| 21.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 87/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 87/9

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/480 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria apply

(2017/C 87/08)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 (2), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/480 (3).

2

3

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 36/2012, as implemented by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/480.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (4).

4

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 16, 19.1.2012, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 75, 21.3.2017, p. 12.

3

(4)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

4

---
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Jeffrey J. DePolo, :

Appellant :

:

v. : No. 79 C.D. 2017

:

Board of Supervisors of Tredyffrin :

Township; and Michael C. Heaberg, :

Kristen K. Mayock, Paul Olson, :

Evelyn Richter, John P. :

DiBuonaventuro, Mark Freed, :

and Murph Wysocki, in their :

capacities as members of t he :

Board of Supervisors of Tredyffrin :

Township and Tredyffin Township :

Zoning Hearing Board of Appeals; :

and Arnold Borish, Daniel McLaughlin :

and Neill Kling, in their capacities as :

members of the Zoning Hearing Board :

of Appeals of Tredy ffrin Township :

O R D E R

NOW, September 29, 2017

, having considered appellant’s application

for reargument and appellee s ’ answer s in response thereto , the application is denied.

MARY HANNAH LEAVITT,

P resident Judge
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018464EN.01001701.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 27.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 464/17 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9176 — Magna/Getrag Ford Transmissions Slovakia)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 464/10)

1.

On 14 December 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018464EN.01001701-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Magna Powertrain GmbH (‘Magna’, Austria), controlled by Magna International Inc. (Canada), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Getrag Ford Transmissions Slovakia (‘GFT’, Slovakia). |

Magna acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the double clutch transmissions business of GFT.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of assets.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Magna: Magna is a subsidiary of Magna International Inc., a global automotive supplier of body, chassis, exterior, seating, powertrain, electronic, vision, closure and roof systems and modules, as well as complete vehicle engineering and contract manufacturing,

—   for GFT: GFT is a contract manufacturer of transmission systems for passenger cars and light commercial vehicles. The business associated with the intended acquisition relates exclusively to the manufacture of double clutch transmissions.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018464EN.01001701-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9176 — Magna/Getrag Ford Transmissions Slovakia

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018464EN.01001701-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018464EN.01001701-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
Dorothy M. MAY, Petitioner, v. Robert WILKIE, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

No. 19M62

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time under Rule 14.5 denied.
IN RE Alexander PALOMAREZ, Petitioner

No. 19-6854

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.