alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Micah L. LAWSON, Petitioner, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 19-7523.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Perspecta Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), John M. Curtis, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|   |                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|a) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|b) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:June 29, 2018/s/ John M. CurtisJohn M. CurtisPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Willis, Bray and Senior Judge Hodges 

Argued at Alexandria, Virginia 

JAY JEFFREY BROWN 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION* BY 

v. Record No. 2138-96-4 JUDGE WILLIAM H. HODGES 

 APRIL 1, 1997 

LOUDOUN COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 Laurie D. Waters (Jack T. Burgess & 

Associates, on brief), for appellant. 

 Susan A. Evans (Siciliano, Ellis, Dyer & 

Boccarosse, on brief), for appellee. 

 Jay Jeffrey Brown (claimant) contends that the Workers' 

Compensation Commission erred in deciding that a notation of 

"probable HTN" (hypertension) on his pre-employment physical 

notes was sufficient to conclude that Code § 65.2-402(B) was 

inapplicable. We hold that because claimant was not free of 

hypertension at his pre-employment physical, the presumption of 

Code § 65.2-402(B) was not applicable. Accordingly, we affirm 

the commission's decision denying benefits. 

 Claimant is 6'3" tall and weighs approximately 330 pounds. 

In June or July, 1989, claimant applied for a part-time position 

of advanced life support specialist with Loudoun County. As part 

of the application process, claimant underwent a pre-employment 

physical examination. The July 13, 1989 physical examination 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 
 2 

report reflected blood pressure readings of 162/88, 150/94, 

144/104, and 144/98. In this report, Dr. John Hatala listed a 

diagnosis of "probable HTN" (hypertension). 

 Code § 65.2-402(B) provides a rebuttable presumption that, 

absent a preponderance of evidence to the contrary, a causal 

connection exists between certain public service jobs and 

hypertension. However, Code § 65.2-402(D) states, in part, that 

the presumption that hypertension is a work-related occupational 

disease applies to persons who have "undergone preemployment 

physical examinations that . . . (iv) found such persons free of 

. . ., hypertension, . . . at the time of such examinations." 

Dr. Hatala diagnosed the claimant as having "probable" 

hypertension. "A statement that a certain condition is probably 

present means there is a reasonable likelihood of the condition's 

existence, and this is sufficient to permit a trier of fact to 

accord the statement probative weight." Cook v. City of 

Waynesboro Police Dep't, 225 Va. 23, 30, 300 S.E.2d 746, 749 

(1983). "Where reasonable inferences may be drawn from the 

evidence in support of the commission's factual findings, they 

will not be disturbed by this Court on appeal." Hawks v. Henrico 

County School Bd., 7 Va. App. 398, 404, 374 S.E.2d 695, 698 

(1988). 

 The diagnosis of "probable" hypertension at claimant's 

pre-employment physical examination supports the conclusion that 

claimant was not free of hypertension at the time he was hired. 
 3 

Therefore, pursuant to Code § 65.2-402(D), the presumption 

afforded under Code § 65.2-402(B) is not applicable. The 

commission did not err by denying claimant compensation for his 

work-related hypertension claim. We affirm the commission's 

decision. 

 Affirmed.
Matthew J. ROSENWASSER, Petitioner v. FORDHAM UNIVERSITY, et al.

No. 19-166

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Scott PETERS, Petitioner v. ILLINOIS

No. 18-9706

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-1 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and
represent that:

1. A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of
January 24, 2018, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-1 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the
Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my
knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By:

/s/ Sandra M. BroderickName:

Sandra M. BroderickTitle:

EVP Head of OperationsDate:

March 29, 2019By:

/s/ Andrew KangName:

Andrew KangTitle:

TreasurerDate:

March 29, 2019
EXHIBIT
32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of Leader Hill Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
November 30, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), The undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to the best of my knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully
    complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                            
| | (2) | The information
    contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
    Company.



|Date:
    January 23, 2020 |        |                                              
|-------------------------- | ------ | ---------------------------------------------
|                           | By:    | /s/
    Seah Chia Yee                        
|                           | Title: | President, Secretary,
    Treasurer, Director



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
IBG LLC, et al., Petitioners v. TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

No. 19-120

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Bryan BINKHOLDER, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9043

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

WONDERSHARE TECHNOLOGY GROUP

CO LTD.,

Defendants.

 CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-cv-00046

 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER

The Court, having considered the Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to 

Defendant Wondershare Technology Group Co Ltd.’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 7), 

GRANTS the Motion. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the deadline for the Plaintiff to submit its Response 

shall be extended up to and including April 18, 2024. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case 2:24-cv-00046-JRG-RSP Document 10-1 Filed 04/04/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 108
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

GREGORY HOWARD GROOMS §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-248 

J. BARTLETT, ET AL. §

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Gregory Howard Grooms, a prisoner previously confined at the United States

Penitentiary in Beaumont, Texas, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens

v. Six Unknown Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). 

The Court referred thismatterto theHonorable Christine L. Stetson, United States Magistrate

Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. 

On October 31, 2023, the magistrate judge recommended dismissing the action without prejudice

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). To date, the parties have not filed objections to

the report.

The Court received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available

evidence. Proper notice was given to Plaintiff at his last known address. See FED. R. CIV. P.

5(b)(2)(C). After careful review, the Court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of

the United States Magistrate Judge are correct. 

Case 1:23-cv-00248-MJT-CLS Document 11 Filed 11/27/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 137
ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct,

and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [Dkt. #10] is ADOPTED. 

A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate judge’s

recommendation. 

2

Case 1:23-cv-00248-MJT-CLS Document 11 Filed 11/27/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 138
Jamaal A. MCNEIL, Petitioner v. NEBRASKA, et al.;

No. 18-9014

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
SUBJECT:	Rule 10f-3 Report


The following funds purchased securities
and complied with the provisions of Rule
10f-3.



Salomon Brothers Variable Capital Fund
10f-3 REPORT

SALOMON BROTHERS VARIABLE
CAPITAL  FUND
July 1, 2001 through September 30, 2001

Issuer: Wright Medical Group
Trade Date: 7/2/01
Seller Dealer: JP Morgan
Purchase Amount: $1,250
Price: $12.50
% of Issue (1): 0.02A

Issuer: PDF Solutions
Trade Date: 7/27/01
Seller Dealer: CS First Boston
Purchase Amount: $1,200
Price: $12.00
% of Issue (1): 0.03B

Issuer: Mykroslis Corp
Trade Date: 8/9/01
Seller Dealer: Montgomery Securities
Purchase Amount: $1,500
Price: $15.00
% of Issue (1): 0.02C



(1) Represents purchases by all affiliated
funds; may not exceed 25% of the offering.

A - A total of 1,400 shares was purchased
by funds in the Salomon Brothers complex
for an aggregate purchase price of $17,500.
B - A total of 1,400 shares was purchased
by funds in the Salomon Brothers complex
for an aggregate purchase price of $16,800.
C - A total of 1,600 shares was purchased
by funds in the Salomon Brothers complex
for an aggregate purchase price of $24,000.
IA 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 114 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States concerning 

the election of the Members of the House of Representatives. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2014 

Mr. LARSON of Connecticut introduced the following joint resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States concerning the election of the Members of the 

House of Representatives. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 114 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. The House of Representatives shall be 

3 composed of Members chosen every fourth year by the peo4 ple of the several States. Immediately after the first elec5 tion, they shall be assembled and divided as equally as 

6 may be into two classes. The seats of the Representatives 

7 of the first class shall be vacated at the expiration of the 

8 second year and the second class at the expiration of the 

9 fourth year, so that one half may be chosen every second 

10 year. 

11 ‘‘SECTION 2. This article shall not be so construed 

12 as to affect the election or term of any Representative cho13 sen before it becomes valid as part of the Constitution. 

14 ‘‘SECTION 3. This article shall apply to the first elec15 tion of Representatives which occurs after ratification but 

16 no earlier than 2018. 

17 ‘‘SECTION 4. The Congress shall have power to en18 force this article by appropriate legislation.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Huntsman LLC (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. Kimo Esplin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| |  | /s/J. KIMO ESPLINJ. Kimo Esplin Chief Financial OfficerAugust 16, 2004
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------

This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

---



QuickLinks
Richard FELTON, Petitioner, v. Colette M. GOGUEN, Superintendent, North Central Correctional Institution.

No. 19-5610

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Marvin ROBINSON, Petitioner, v. Darrel VANNOY, Warden.

No. 19-5780

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Latasha BOYD, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES;

Latasha Boyd, Petitioner v. South Carolina, et al.;

Latasha Boyd, Petitioner v. Bill Diangikes.

No. 19-5733

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Wade LAY, Petitioner v. OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.

No. 19-5942

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Ivan Lee VASQUEZ, Petitioner v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 19-5712

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three denied.
# C_2018024EN.01000301.xml

| 24.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/3

---

Special Report No 3/2018

‘Audit of the Macroeconomic Imbalance Procedure (MIP)’

(2018/C 24/03)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 3/2018 ‘Audit of the Macroeconomic Imbalance Procedure (MIP)’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://eca.europa.eu

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY
RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 CERTIFICATIONS
 I, W. Anderson Geater, Jr., certify that:
 1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Origen Financial, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




---



##### 



5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent function):
    /s/ W. Anderson Geater, Jr.W. Anderson Geater, Jr.,Chief Financial Officer of Origen Financial, Inc.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atomic  Paintball,  Inc. on Form 10-Q
for the period  ended  September  30,  2009,  as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David J. Cutler, Chief
Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: November 23, 2009



By: /s/ David J. Cutler
    ----------------------------------
    David J. Cutler
    Chief Executive Officer, principal financial officer
Wayne PETTAWAY, Petitioner v. Michael CLARK, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Albion

No. 19-5462

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the filing of Brightpoint, Inc.'s (the "Company")
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 (the
"Report"), I, Anthony W. Boor, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                               /s/ Anthony W. Boor
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Anthony W. Boor
                               Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
                               and Treasurer

Date: March 1, 2006
| 1. The Report is in full compliance with reporting requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Corporation. |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                          | REBORNNE (USA), INC. |                                            |
|-------------------------------|----------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                          |                 |                                            |   |
| Date:  November 22, 2010 | By:                  | /s/ Dairy Global                                |   |
|                          |                 | Dairy Global                                    |   |
|                          |                 | President,                                      |   |
|                          |                 | Chief Executive Officer,Chief Financial Officer |   |
Carlos M. GUERRERO-CASTRO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8376.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 26, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.