alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 VIASPACE INC.
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of VIASPACE Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the registrant and we have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
    /s/ CARL KUKKONENCarl KukkonenChief Executive Officer
 25
Independent Auditors' Consent



To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Greenwich Street California Municipal Fund Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference, in this Prospectus, of
our report dated October 13, 2000, on the statement of assets and
liabilities for Greenwich Street California Municipal Fund Inc as of
August 31, 2000 and the related statement of operations for the year
then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the
years in the two-year period then ended and the financial highlights
for each of the years in the five-year period then ended.  These
financial statements and financial highlights and our report thereon
are included in the Annual Report of the Fund as filed on Form N-30D.

We also consent to the reference to our firm under the headings
"Financial Highlights" and "Independent Auditors" in the Prospectus.



			KPMG LLP


New York, New York
November 22, 2000
# C_2018447EN.01000401.xml

| 12.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 447/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 447/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9184 — Engie/Prédica Prévoyance Dialogue du Crédit Agricole/Omnes Capital/4 Wind Farms)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 447/07)

On 5 December 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9184. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9184. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
# C_2015118EN.01002002.xml

| 13.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/20

---

Appeal brought on 6 February 2015 by Trenzas y Cables de Acero PSC, S.L. against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 25 November 2014 in Joined Cases T-428/10 and T-577/10 and in Case T-441/12 Trenzas y Cables de Acero v Commission

(Case C-55/15 P)

(2015/C 118/27)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Trenzas y Cables de Acero PSC, S.L. (represented by: F. González Díaz and A. Tresandi Blanco, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside, pursuant to Article 263 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the order of the General Court of 25 November 2014 in Joined Cases T-428/10 and T-577/10 and in Case T-441/12 Trenzas y Cables de Acero v Commission; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside, pursuant to Article 263 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the order of the General Court of 25 November 2014 in Joined Cases T-428/10 and T-577/10 and in Case T-441/12 Trenzas y Cables de Acero v Commission;

Trenzas y Cables de Acero

Commission

| — | order the European Commission to pay the costs of the present proceedings and the proceedings before the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay the costs of the present proceedings and the proceedings before the General Court.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of its appeal, the appellant puts forward a single ground of appeal.

The appellant claims that the General Court erred in law in assessing the legal interest of Trenzas y Cables de Acero PSC in bringing proceedings, as regards both the action for annulment in Case T-577/10 against the decision of the Commission of 30 September 2010 amending Decision C(2010) 4387 (final) relating to a proceeding under Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 53(1) of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.344 — Prestressing Steel), and the amendment of the pleas in law and forms of order sought in Case T-428/10 in relation to the decision of the Commission of 30 September 2010 amending Decision C(2010) 4387 (final) relating to a proceeding under Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 53(1) of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.344 — Prestressing Steel).

---
Ronald Lewis COLEMAN, Jr., Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5445

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Parnell SMITH, Petitioner, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.;

No. 18-9190

Supreme Court of the United States.

Dec. 9, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
William A. RUNNELS, Petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 19-7746.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Texas denied.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 119 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code to make permanent the credit for 

increasing research activities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2013 

Mr. HOLT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code to make permanent 

the credit for increasing research activities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF RESEARCH CRED4 IT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 41 of the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986 is amended by striking subsection (h). 

7 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Paragraph (1) of 

8 section 45C(b) of such Code is amended by striking sub9 paragraph (D). 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HR 119 IH

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to amounts paid or incurred after 

3 December 31, 2011. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 7 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 7

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
  regarding presidential election voting rights for residents of all 
              United States territories and commonwealths.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2013

    Mrs. Christensen (for herself and Ms. Bordallo) introduced the 
following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
  regarding presidential election voting rights for residents of all 
              United States territories and commonwealths.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote in 
the election for President and Vice President shall not be denied or 
abridged by the United States or by any State on account of residency 
in a territory or commonwealth of the United States.
    ``Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article 
by appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```
Daniel Brian MASSON, Petitioner v. FLORIDA

No. 19-5701

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District denied.
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Smith Barney Concert Allocation Series Inc.:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements
of the High Growth, Growth, Balanced, Conservative, and Income
Portfolios of Smith Barney Concert Allocation Series Inc. (the
"Fund") for the year ended January 31, 1998, we considered its
internal control, including control activities for safeguarding
securities, in order to determine our auditing procedures for the
purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and
to comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide
assurance on the internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles. Those controls include the safeguarding of
assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or
irregularities may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection
of any evaluation of internal control to future periods is
subject to the risk that it may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and
operation may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in the internal control that might be
material weaknesses under standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness
is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of
the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively
low level the risk that errors or irregularities in amounts that
would be material in relation to the financial statements being
audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by
employees in the normal course of performing their assigned
functions.  However, we noted no matters involving the internal
control and its operation, including controls for safeguarding
securities that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined
above.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management, the Board of Directors of the Fund, and the
Securities and Exchange Commission.




March 16, 1998
Diane B. WEISSBURG, Petitioner v. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.

No. 19-69

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit X

Redacted in Entirety

Case 2:24-cv-00021-JRG Document 54-25 Filed 07/18/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 3511
# United States Court of Appeals **For the First Circuit** No. 00-1055 BOSTON EDISON COMPANY, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION,

Respondent.

__________ NEW ENGLAND POWER COMPANY,

Intervenor. ERRATA The opinion of this Court, issued on December 1, 2000, should be amended as follows. On page 11, line 4 of footnote 6, replace " subno. " with " sub nom. ". On page 19, line 9 of 2nd full paragraph, delete ", which" and replace with "that". On page 23, line 13 of 1st full paragraph, replace "filing" with "filings".
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 222/2006

of 8 February 2006         

on granting of import licences for cane sugar for the purposes of certain tariff quotas and preferential agreements

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1),

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1095/96 of 18 June 1996 on the implementation of the concessions set out in Schedule CXL drawn up in the wake of the conclusion of the GATT XXIV.6 negotiations (2),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1159/2003 of 30 June 2003 laying down detailed rules of application for the 2003/04, 2004/05 and 2005/06 marketing years for the import of cane sugar under certain tariff quotas and preferential agreements and amending Regulations (EC) No 1464/95 and (EC) No 779/96 (3), and in particular Article 5(4) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In the case of import licence applications presented from 30 January to 3 February 2006 in line with Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1159/2003 licences shall be issued for the quantities indicated in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 9 February 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 February 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 987/2005 (OJ L 167, 29.6.2005, p. 12).

(2)OJ L 146, 20.6.1996, p. 1.

(3)OJ L 162, 1.7.2003, p. 25. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 568/2005 (OJ L 97, 15.4.2005, p. 9).

(4)OJ L 29, 2.2.2006, p. 28.

----

ANNEX

ACP–INDIA preferential sugar

Title II of Regulation (EC) No 1159/2003

2005/06 marketing year

Special preferential sugar

Title III of Regulation (EC) No 1159/2003

2005/06 marketing year

CXL concessions sugar

Title IV of Regulation (EC) No 1159/2003

2005/06 marketing year

----
----

|   | (1) |   | the 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  |
|--------|-----|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) |   | the information contained in the 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.         |
|--------|-----|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                        |   |                          |   |         |
|-----------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|--------------|
| Date: August 16, 2010       |   | /s/ Carl Kukkonen             |   |         |
|                        |   | Carl Kukkonen            |   |         |
|                   |   | Chief Executive Officer  |   |         |
|                        |   |                          |   |         |
| Date: August 16, 2010  |   | /s/ Stephen J. Muzi           |   |    |
|                        |   | Stephen J. Muzi          |   |         |
|                        |   | Chief Financial Officer  |   |         |
Exhibit 32.1CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

   

   In connection with the annual report of OBITX Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending January 31, 2020, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Hawkins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

   

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

   

   Dated: June 8, 2020

   

   /s/*Michael Hawkins*

   Michael Hawkins,

   Chief Executive Officer


---
RANGER AMERICAN OF THE V.I., INC., et al., Petitioners v. Frederick J. BALBONI, Jr.

No. 19-304

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands denied.
# C_2018067EN.01000202.xml

| 22.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 67/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 67/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8540 — Kuehne + Nagel/Kuehne + Nagel Drinksflow Logistics)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 67/03)

On 8 February 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8540. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8540. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Smith Barney California Municipal Fund Inc.:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements
of the Smith Barney California Municipal Fund Inc. (the "Fund")
for the year ended February 28, 1999, we considered its internal
control, including control activities for safeguarding
securities, in order to determine our auditing procedures for the
purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and
to comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide
assurance on the internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles. Those controls include the safeguarding of
assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or
fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any
evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to
the risk that it may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in the internal control that might be
material weaknesses under standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness
is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of
the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively
low level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in
amounts that would be material in relation to the financial
statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a
timely period by employees in the normal course of performing
their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters involving
the internal control and its operation, including controls for
safeguarding securities that we consider to be material
weaknesses as defined above.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management, the Board of Directors of the Fund, and the
Securities and Exchange Commission.



April 12, 1999
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Opinion Research Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas L. Cox, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |         |  |                                                     
|----------------------- |  | ------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                        |  |        
|Date: November 13, 2006 |  | Signed: |  | /s/ Douglas L. Cox                                  
|                        |  | Name:   |  | Douglas L. Cox                                      
|                        |  | Title:  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer