alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000873637
<NAME> Global Government Bond Portfolio
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER>001
   <NAME>Smith Barney World Funds, Inc.

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 Oct-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                      Oct-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>             125,175,010
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>            113,148,160
<RECEIVABLES>                       2,936,843
<ASSETS-OTHER>                     16,364,950
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    132,449,953
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                    0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>          17,433,238
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                17,433,238
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                             0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>          119,264,934
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                 160,378
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                 155,213
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>          12,412,168
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                      0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>            (3,785,188)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                    0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>          (12,875,199)
<NET-ASSETS>                      115,016,715
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                           0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                   6,678,451
<OTHER-INCOME>                              0
<EXPENSES-NET>                      1,328,925
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>             5,349,526
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>           12,177,109
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>         (10,350,125)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>               7,176,510
<EQUALIZATION>                              0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>             134,782
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                    0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                       0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                23,805
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>            28,938
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                    10,298
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>            (12,439,938)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>             3,140,784
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>          (2,328,771)
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                     0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                  0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                 902,878
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                     1,328,925
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                1,745,488
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                  11.150
<PER-SHARE-NII>                         0.420
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                 0.180
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                    0.830
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>               0.000
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                    0.000
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                    10.950
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                          1.67



</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-11241

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DOMINGO HERNANDEZ-VILLEDA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:15-CR-21-1

Before JONES, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Domingo Hernandez-Villeda

raises an argument that is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 

523 U.S. 224, 228, 235 (1998), which held that convictions used to enhance a 

sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) need not be set forth in the indictment. 

Accordingly, the motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the alternative 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 21, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-11241 Document: 00513557038 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2016
No. 15-11241

2

motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of 

the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 15-11241 Document: 00513557038 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/21/2016
Timothy L. DOUGLAS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6510

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor, with whom Justice Ginsburg joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari:

I dissent for the reasons set out in *Brown v. United States* , 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 14, 202 L.Ed.2d 302 (2018) (Sotomayor, J., dissenting).
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alesco Financial Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, James J. McEntee, III and John J. Longino, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: November 8,
2007



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ James J. McEntee, III            
|James J. McEntee, III                
|Chief Executive Officer and President
|                                     
|/s/ John J. Longino                  
|John J. Longino                      
|Chief Financial Officer
David MORILLO-CRUZ, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6497

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6749

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GEORGE ANTHONY DALLAS, a/k/a Pablo, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (1:97-cr-00266-JAB; 1:05-cv-00910-JAB) Submitted: August 31, 2006 Decided: September 7, 2006 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Anthony Dallas, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Angela Hewlett Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: George Anthony Dallas seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Dallas has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2018103EN.01000102.xml

| 19.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8752 — CPPIB/BHL/BGL)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 103/02)

On 14 March 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8752. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8752. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
ALTITUDE EXPRESS, INC., et al., Petitioners v. Melissa ZARDA, et al.

No. 17-1623

Supreme Court of the United States.

September 11, 2019

Joint motion of petitioner in No. 17-1618 and respondents in No. 17-1623 for divided argument denied. The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted.
# Official Journal C 92A/27 A

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 92A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5027 April 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 92A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5027 April 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 092A/01 | Publication of a vacancy notice for the post of Director of the European Institute for gender equality — (Grade AD 13) — COM/2007/10049 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Commission

2007/C 092A/01

Publication of a vacancy notice for the post of Director of the European Institute for gender equality — (Grade AD 13) — COM/2007/10049

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002
 
 Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Visual Data Corporation (the Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003, (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date: August 27, 2004

/s/ Randy S. SelmanRandy S. SelmanChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1
------------


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                  ---------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Monaco Group Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Peter  Nelipa,
President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Peter Nelipa
------------------------------------------
Peter Nelipa
President and Chief Executive Officer

August 19, 2004
First Amendment To The Empire Blue Cross And Blue Shield Employee Savings Plan



 Exhibit 10.4(a) 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT 
 TO THE 
 EMPIRE BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD 
 EMPLOYEE SAVINGS PLAN TRUST 
  
 WHEREAS, Empire HealthChoice, Inc. doing business as Empire Blue Cross and Blue Shield (“Empire”) has sponsored the Empire Blue Cross and Blue Shield Employee Savings Plan (the “Plan”) and established the Empire
Blue Cross and Blue Shield Employee Savings Plan Trust (the “Trust”) to hold the Plan’s assets; and 
  
 WHEREAS, WellChoice, Inc. (the ‘Company”), as the successor to Empire adopted the Plan; adopted the Plan and has assumed the Trust; and

  
 WHEREAS, Section 5.2 of the Trust provides for a
successor employer to become the Employer under the terms of the trust in the event of a dissolution, merger or consolidation, where the successor employer is continuing to carry on all or substantially all of the business and elects to carry on the
provisions of the Plan; and 
  
 WHEREAS, pursuant to
Section 5.4 of the Trust, the Employer has the right to amend the Trust at any time; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Trust, effective as of the close of business on November 7, 2002, to reflect the change in the sponsorship of the Trust. 
  
 NOW THEREFORE, effective after the close of business on November 7,
2002, the Trust is hereby amended as follows: 
  
 1. The
introductory paragraph of the Trust is amended by inserting the following sentence at the end there of: 
  
 “Notwithstanding the foregoing, effective as of the close of business on November 7, 2002, ‘Employer’ shall mean WellChoice, Inc., a
for-profit corporation.” 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
Company has executed this amendment as of this 18th day of December, 2002. 
  

			
	 WELLCHOICE, INC.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Michael A. Stocker, M.D.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000856343
<NAME> SMITH BARNEY SMALL CAP BLEND FUND, INC. - CLASS Y

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                      321,956,981
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                     340,189,430
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,689,672
<ASSETS-OTHER>                              35,539,295
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             382,418,397
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                     2,332,458
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                   36,392,923
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                         38,725,381
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                      0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                   309,621,865
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                       17,996,454
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                       15,561,140
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                      382,804
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                     14,518,898
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                    19,169,449
<NET-ASSETS>                               343,693,016
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                            3,274,890
<INTEREST-INCOME>                              839,790
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                               3,034,690
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                      1,079,990
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                    65,293,020
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                  (4,324,590)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                       62,048,420
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                      436,658
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                    28,557,565
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                      2,435,314
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                          0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                                  0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                      62,780,991
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                        (2,083)
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                 (13,047,321)
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                        2,240,238
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                              3,034,690
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                       224,381,859
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                            13.34
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                   0.08
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                           2.66
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                              0.03
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                         1.68
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                              0.00
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                              14.37
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                   0.82


</TABLE>
Rudy ESPUDO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5105

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 92 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 92

 To authorize the payment of legal expenses of Senate employees out of 
                   the contingent fund of the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 3, 2011

  Mr. Schumer (for himself and Mr. Alexander) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To authorize the payment of legal expenses of Senate employees out of 
                   the contingent fund of the Senate.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF THE PAYMENT OF LEGAL EXPENSES.

    (a) In General.--The Committee on Rules and Administration is 
authorized to pay out of the contingent fund of the Senate the legal 
expenses incurred by Jean Manning and Erica Watkins for the employment 
of private counsel to represent them with respect to official actions 
and responsibilities before the grand jury in the United States 
District Court for the District of Columbia.
    (b) Determination.--The amount of expenses paid pursuant to 
subsection (a) shall be determined by the Committee on Rules and 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
Edwin F. PARSON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES AIR FORCE, et al.

No. 19-7852.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Jonathan S. METCALF, Petitioner v. Michael FITZGERALD, et al.

No. 19-490

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Connecticut denied.
Ishmael WAHID, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9769

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 07, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000919557
<NAME> AIM CAPITAL APPRECIATION PORTFOLIO
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER> 12
   <NAME> TRAVELERS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                      274,956,792
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                     422,624,387
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,070,823
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                   3,964
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             425,699,174
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                     3,183,295
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                      328,677
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                          3,511,972
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                      0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                   222,055,338
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                       19,319,121
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                       18,376,228
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                    (771,728)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                     53,171,718
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                   147,731,874
<NET-ASSETS>                               422,187,202
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                              273,403
<INTEREST-INCOME>                              566,596
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                               1,611,727
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                      (771,728)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                    43,113,579
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                   60,017,717
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                      102,359,568
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                            0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                      5,253,165
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                  4,310,272
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                                  0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                     122,667,596
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                   10,058,139
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                        1,556,216
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                              1,611,727
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                       392,768,187
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                            16.30
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                 (0.04)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                           5.59
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                              0.00
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                         0.00
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                              0.00
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                              21.85
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                   0.82


</TABLE>
Jordon Louis DONGARRA, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES;

No. 19-5066

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
# L_2004342EN.01S00301.xml

| 18.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 342/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 342/s3

---

1 November 2004 — New version of EUR-Lex!

europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/

The new site incorporates the Celex service and provides free and easy access in 20 languages to the largest documentary database on EU law.

---