alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018048EN.01000201.xml

| 9.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8736 — Toohil Telecom/Eircom)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 48/03)

On 6 February 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8736. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8736. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 09/24/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       46,273
COMMITMENTS
   7,209    9,033    1,351   24,253   24,518   32,813   34,903   13,459   11,370

CHANGES FROM 09/17/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,940)
   1,501      866      210      911    2,850    2,621    3,926      318     -986

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    15.6     19.5      2.9     52.4     53.0     70.9     75.4     29.1     24.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       68)
       9       19        7       36       27       50       49
```

----

Updated September 27, 2013
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 32(B)

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

           In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Navarre
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 13, 2004 (the "Quarterly
Report"), I, James Gilbertson, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
            or 78o(d)); and

      2.    The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in
            all material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company at the end of and for the period covered
            by the Quarterly Report.

August 13, 2004                        By    /s/ James Gilbertson
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                                James Gilbertson
                                                Vice President and
                                                Chief Financial Officer
Benson CORIOLANT, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5374

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Gregory GREEN, Petitioner v. Donald BECKWITH, Warden

No. 19-5512

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

*525Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**WRITTEN STATEMENTOFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

The undersigned hereby certify that the Form 10-Q for thequarter ended March 31, 2005 filed by TNS, Inc. with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the issuer.

 
| Dated: May 2, 2005                                         |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                            |
| /s/ JOHN J. MCDONNELL, JR.                                      |   |
| John J. McDonnell, Jr.                                     |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                            |
|                                                            |
| Dated: May 2, 2005                                         |
|                                                            |
| /s/ HENRY H. GRAHAM, JR.                                        |   |
| Henry H. Graham, Jr.                                       |
| Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |

 

----
1

The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 09-1495

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Missouri.

Orlando Harris, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: June 26, 2009

Filed: July 8, 2009

___________

Before RILEY, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

In 2006, Orlando Harris was sentenced to 12 months and 1 day in prison and

5 years of supervised release for bank fraud, a Class B felony. The district court1

subsequently revoked his supervised release and sentenced him to additional

imprisonment and supervised release. While Harris was serving his second term of

supervised release, he violated conditions requiring him to file monthly reports with

the probation officer, maintain lawful employment, timely notify the probation officer

of changes in employment and residence, participate in substance-abuse counseling
-2-

and testing, and make restitution payments. The district court again revoked

supervised release, this time sentencing Harris to 10 months in prison and 36 months

of supervised release. Harris appeals, arguing that his violations were not egregious

enough to warrant his sentence, and that his sentence is therefore unreasonable and

greater than necessary to accomplish statutory sentencing goals.

We conclude that the revocation sentence is not unreasonable. See United

States v. Tyson, 413 F.3d 824, 825 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (standard of review).

First, the court sentenced Harris within the statutory limits. See 18 U.S.C.

§ 3583(b)(1) (authorized maximum term of supervised release for Class B felony is

5 years), (e)(3) (upon revocation, maximum time defendant may be required to serve

in prison is 3 years if offense that resulted in term of supervised release is Class B

felony), (h) (revocation sentence may include additional supervised release term not

exceeding term of supervised release authorized by statute for offense that resulted in

original supervised release, less any prison term imposed upon revocation). Second,

the court sentenced him within the advisory Guidelines range, after listening to the

arguments of counsel, reviewing Harris’s supervision experiences, and expressly

considering relevant matters under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (permitting revocation of

supervised release and re-imprisonment, after consideration of specified factors in 18

U.S.C. § 3553(a)). See United States v. Franklin, 397 F.3d 604, 606-07 (8th Cir.

2005) (all that is required is evidence that court considered relevant matters, not that

court made specific findings on each § 3553(a) factor).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment, and we grant counsel’s

motion to withdraw.

______________________________
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY
RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 CERTIFICATIONS I, Ronald A. Klein, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Origen Financial,
Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Dated:
August 16, 2004/s/  Ronald A. KleinRonald A. Klein,
Chief Executive Officer of Origen Financial, Inc.
Joseph RAIMONDO, Petitioner v. Denise Page HOOD, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, et al.

No. 19-383

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,287
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,668
<ALLOWANCES>                                       118
<INVENTORY>                                         73
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,435
<PP&E>                                           2,190
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,065
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,695
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,841
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         16
<COMMON>                                           209
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,466
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,695
<SALES>                                          1,371
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,644
<CGS>                                               97
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       97
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,181
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   3
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,629)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         2
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,631)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,631)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.15)


</TABLE>
IN RE Joel DIAZ-HINIRIO, Petitioner

No. 19-5504

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of prohibition denied.
```

```

----

Updated June 20, 2014
# C_2018370EN.01000202.xml

| 12.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 370/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 370/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8828 — Gauselmann/NOVOMATIC/Spielbank Bad Neuenahr/Spielbank Mainz JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 370/03)

On 2 October 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8828. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8828. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Andrew CONDON, Petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 19-5349

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District denied.
# C_2017436EN.01000501.xml

| 16.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 436/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 436/5

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2017/C 436/07)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 28.10.2017 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 28.10.2017-31.12.2017 |
| Member State | Portugal |
| Stock or Group of stocks | DWS/10- |
| Species | Deep-sea sharks (Deania hystricosa and Deania profundorum) |
| Zone | Union and international waters of X |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 35/TQ2285 |

Date and time of closure

28.10.2017

Duration

28.10.2017-31.12.2017

Member State

Portugal

Stock or Group of stocks

DWS/10-

Species

Deep-sea sharks (Deania hystricosa and Deania profundorum)

Deania hystricosa

Deania profundorum

Zone

Union and international waters of X

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

35/TQ2285

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
```

```

----

Updated July 13, 2013
Joshua VASQUEZ, et al., petitioners, v. Kimberly FOXX, State's Attorney of Cook County, Illinois.

No. 18-386.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Fred BLAJOS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7616.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 07-1240

DR. JOSÉ S. BELAVAL, INC.,

Plaintiff/Appellant,

RIO GRANDE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER, INC.; CONCILIO DE SALUD

INTEGRAL DE LOIZA, INC. (CSILO),

Plaintiffs,

v.

HON. ROSA PÉREZ-PERDOMO, Secretary, Department of Health of the

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico,

Defendant/Appellee,

COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

AND HUMAN SERVICES; MICHAEL O. LEAVITT, Secretary, United States

Department of Health and Human Services,

Defendants.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this court issued on May 18, 2007 is amended as

follows:

On page 14, line 19, replace the words "Double costs" with the

word "Costs."
SMITH BARNEY EQUITY FUNDS
                  January 1, 1997 through June 30, 1997
                              10f-3 Report
                                    

                                                       % of
               Trade                              Purchase  Fund % of
Issuer              Date Selling Dealer      Shares         Price
Assets    Issue

Kilrou Realty Corp  1/28/97   Pru Bache      18,500         $23.00
0.12%     0.16%

Knightsbridge Tankers    2/26/97   Goldman, Sachs      45,000
20.00          0.26 0.36

Provident Companies 5/5/97    Morgan Stanley      15,000           53.00
0.22 2.87

New Jersey          6/26/97   Morgan Stanley      $1,000,000
100.00         0.27 0.04
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 115 (Wednesday, June 15, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 36157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12913]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: June 15, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
June 7, 2022, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 744 to Competitive Product List. 
Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2022-64, CP2022-
70.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2022-12913 Filed 6-14-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 01/28/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       68,828
COMMITMENTS
  15,947    9,592    2,487   34,708   43,351   53,142   55,430   15,686   13,398

CHANGES FROM 01/21/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,524)
     287      297      755    1,965    1,828    3,007    2,880      517      644

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    23.2     13.9      3.6     50.4     63.0     77.2     80.5     22.8     19.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       80)
      22       13       13       36       30       63       54
```

----

Updated January 31, 2014