alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018183EN.01001501.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 29.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/15 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.8919 — Permira/Exclusive Group)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 183/07)

1.

On 22 May 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018183EN.01001501-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Permira VI G.P. Limited (United Kingdom), controlled by Permira Holdings Limited (United Kingdom), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Exclusive France Holding and Exclusive Management SAS (France). |

Permira VI G.P. Limited acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Exclusive France Holding and Exclusive Management SAS.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Permira VI G.P.: a private equity fund ultimately controlled by Permira Holdings Limited with private equity investments in companies active in a variety of sectors,

—   for Exclusive Group France Holding and Exclusive Management SAS: companies active in the wholesale distribution of IT products, specifically hardware, software, cloud solutions and services dedicated to enterprise IT security and software defined data centres.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018183EN.01001501-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.8919 — Permira/Exclusive Group

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018183EN.01001501-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018183EN.01001501-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

May 1, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00371

- CR

Arthur THOMAS, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the County Court at Law, Val Verde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17

- 155

- CR Honorable Sergio J. Gonzalez, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On April 15, 2020, this court issued its opinion and judgment in this appeal. On April 30, 2020

, Appellant timely filed a motion for a twenty

- one

- day extension of time to file a motion for rehearing. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.1 , 49.8

. Appellant’s motion for extension of time is GRANTED. Appellant’s motion for rehearing is due on May 21, 2020

.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my ha nd and affixed the seal of the said court on this 1st day of May, 2020

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
February 14 , 2012



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

WILLIAM T. DRENN E N III , Appellant

NO. 14

- 10

- 01099

- CV V.

EXXON MOBIL CORPORAT ION , Appellee

____________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Exxon Mobil Corporation, signed November 11, 2010, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore order the judgment of the court
below REVERSED and REMAND the cause for proc eedings in accordance with the court's opinion.

We order appellee, Exxon Mobil Corporation, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Donald REDDICK, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES;

No. 18-9354

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
The INCLUSIVE COMMUNITIES PROJECT, INC., Petitioner, v. LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY, et al.

No. 19-497.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
December 5 , 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF H .B

- S. AND C .B

- S, CHILDREN
NO. 14

- 13

- 00910

- CV V.

____________ ____________________ Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the order signed by the court below on September 26, 2013. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that al l costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant, M.M. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
**
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**Certification Under Section 906**

**of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

In connection with the Annual Report of PermRock Royalty Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2018, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to her knowledge: 

 
(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and 

 
(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Trust. 

 
  SIMMONS BANK, TRUSTEE FOR PERMROCK ROYALTY TRUSTDate: April 1, 2019  By: /s/ LEE ANN ANDERSON   Lee Ann Anderson,   Senior Vice President   Simmons Bank
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to PermRock Royalty Trust and willbe retained by PermRock Royalty Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request. 
**
Willie JONES, Jr., Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6266

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 12, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS
N O S. A P - 76, 217 & A P - 76, 218

EX PA R TE C H A R LE S JO SEP H C H U R A N , A ppl i c ant

ON AP P LI CAT I ONS F OR A W RI T OF HABE AS CORP US CAUS E N OS . 6 3 0 9 5 & 6 3 0 9 6 I N T HE 2 5 2 ND DI S TR I CT COURT

FROM J EFF ERS ON CO UNTY

P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pur s u an t to th e p r o v is io n s o f A rti c le 1 1
. 0 7 o f th e T e xa s Co d e o f Cr im in a l Pr o c edure , the cler k of the trial co u rt t ransmit ted to this Court t hese a pplications for a

writ of habe as cor

pus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Appli cant wa s convicted of indece ncy wi th a c hil d an d sexua l per fo rm anc e by a c hil d and se nte nc e d to imp ri so nme nt fo r te n a nd tw e nty y ear s, respe ctively
. Applicant conte nds, among other thing s, that his trial counsel re ndere d ineffe ctive assistanc e beca use he failed to a dvise Applicant of his rig ht to appeal his punish m en t. The trial cour t has deter mined that trial counsel fa iled to advise Applica nt of his rig ht to appeal. We find, ther efor e, that2

Ap pli c ant is e nti tle d to the op po rt un ity to f ile out- of -t ime a pp e a ls o f h is p un ish me nt i n ju dg me nts of convic tion in C ause N os. 63095 and 63096 from the 252nd J udicial District Court of J eff erson Count y . Appl icant is order ed re turned to that time at which he may g ive written notice s of appe al so that he may

then, with the aid of c oun s el , o b t ain m eaning ful appe als. All time lim its shall be calc ulated as if the sentenc es had be en imposed on the date on which the ma ndate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant de sire to prosec ute appe als, he must take aff irmative steps to file written notices of

appea l in the trial court withi n 3 0 day s after the mandate of this Court issues. Applicant’s re maining c laims are dismissed. Ex parte Torres , 9 43 S.W. 2d 46 9 ( Te x. Cr im. App. 1997).

Deliver ed: September

16, 2009 Do No t Pu

bli sh
# Official Journal C 255/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 255 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4921 October 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 255

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4921 October 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | European ParliamentCouncilCommission |
| 2006/C 255/1 | Statement by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission concerning the Council Decision of 17 July 2006 amending Decision 1999/468/EC laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission (2006/512/EC) | 1 |
| | Council |
| 2006/C 255/2 | Council Decision of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission (1999/468/EC) (OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p. 23, Decision as amended by Decision 2006/512/EC (OJ L 200, 22.7.2006, p. 11)) (Consolidated version) | 4 |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 255/3 | Euro exchange rates | 9 |
| 2006/C 255/4 | Notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping measures | 10 |
| 2006/C 255/5 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4402 — UCB/Schwarz Pharma) (1) | 11 |
| 2006/C 255/6 | Imposition of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services between the Canary Islands pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 (1) | 12 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

European ParliamentCouncilCommission

2006/C 255/1

Statement by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission concerning the Council Decision of 17 July 2006 amending Decision 1999/468/EC laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission (2006/512/EC)

1

Council

2006/C 255/2

Council Decision of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission (1999/468/EC) (OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p. 23, Decision as amended by Decision 2006/512/EC (OJ L 200, 22.7.2006, p. 11)) (Consolidated version)

4

Commission

2006/C 255/3

Euro exchange rates

9

2006/C 255/4

Notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

10

2006/C 255/5

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4402 — UCB/Schwarz Pharma) (1)

11

2006/C 255/6

Imposition of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services between the Canary Islands pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 (1)

12

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
SMITH BARNEY FUNDAMENTAL VALUE FUND INC.
(the "Fund")

Supplement Dated April 21, 1998
To Prospectus Dated January 28, 1998


In addition to the investment strategies described in the 
Prospectus under "Investment Objectives and Management Policies-
Options on Securities" and "Options on Broad-Based Domestic Stock 
Indexes", the Fund may, for hedging purposes and/or to generate 
income, write put options on securities or stock indexes traded on 
national securities exchanges as well as in the over-the-counter 
market ("OTC Options").  There are certain risks associated with 
option transactions.  Writing a put option, for example, could 
force the Fund to purchase securities at inopportune times or for 
prices higher or lower than the current market value.  Please see 
the Prospectus for further information on the use of option 
transactions.
IN RE Warren PARKS, Petitioner

No. 19-6248

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 16, 2019

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
# C_2018288EN.01000102.xml

| 16.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/1

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case M.8792 — T-Mobile NL/Tele2 NL)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 288/02)

On 12 June 2018, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the above-mentioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the internal market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference No M.8792 — T-Mobile NL/Tele2 NL, to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed Septemb er 18, 2024

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D23

- 0179 Lower Tribunal No. 19

- 5257

________________


### Thomas Wilson , Appellant,

vs. 

### In Re: Estate of Peter Loftin ,

Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Jorge E. Cueto , Judge. GrayRobinson, P.A., and Jack R. Reiter and Sydney Feldman D'Angelo , for appellant. Damian | Valori | Culmo, and Russell Landy and Christopher Perse , for appellee Jorian Loftin

.
Before FERNANDEZ, LINDSEY and LOBREE , JJ. PER CURIAM

. Thomas Wilson appeals two orders granting Jorian Loftin’s (“Jorian”)2

counsel’s petition for payment of Class 1 Administrative Expenses , which found Wilson lacked standing to object to the petition. We reverse, finding Wilson had standing to object to the petition as co - trustee of a revocable trust that is the residuary beneficiary of the estate. “ Section 733.6171(5) of the Probate Code, which governs the compensation of attorneys for the personal representative, confers standing to object to a fee request upon an

‘ interested person ’ . . . .” Duff

- Esformes v. Mukamal , 332 So. 3d 17, 19 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021) (citing § 733.6171(5), Fla. Stat. (2021)). A n “ interested
person ” is defined as “ any person who may reasonably be expected to be affected by the outcome of the particular proceeding involved ” and as the trustee of a trust in any proceeding affecting the expenses of the administration of a decedent’s estate. § 731.201(23), Fla. Stat. (2022). We conclude, b ased on the plain language of statue s , that Wilson had standing

as co - trustee to object to the petition for attorney’s fees and costs filed by Jorian’s counsel . However, we find Wilson’s objection is limited to the reasonableness of the fees sought, as the parties entered into an agreement
that provides that all parties agreed to the entitlement of fees

. See Harley v. Lopez , 784 So. 2d 447, 448 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (stating that where appellant had agreed in writing other party was entitled to attorney’s fees, question before trial court “was not whether such fees and costs would be awarded,3

but only what amount would constitute ‘reasonable’ costs and fees”).
Reversed and remanded.
# C_2018060EN.01000101.xml

| 16.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8777 — Votorantim/CPPIB/VTRM Energia Participações/Ventos do Araripe III)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 60/01)

On 12 February 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8777. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8777. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

July 21, 2014

N o. 04

- 11

- 00156

- CR

Juan E. GUERRA

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009CR13014

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

The Appellant ’ s Motion to Rescind Orders is hereby DENIED.

It is so ORDERED on the 21s t day of July , 201 4

.



### PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

____________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018401EN.01001301.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 7.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 401/13 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9131 — Blackstone/Telereal Trillium/Real Estate JV)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 401/11)

1.

On 26 October 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018401EN.01001301-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | The Blackstone Group L.P. (‘Blackstone’, USA); |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Tele-Finance Holdings Limited (‘Telereal Trillium’, United Kingdom); and |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | the commercial estate business of Network Rail Infrastructure Limited (the ‘Real Estate JV’, United Kingdom). |

Blackstone and Telereal Trillium acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the Real Estate JV. The concentration is accomplished by way of contract.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Blackstone: global asset manager, headquartered in the USA with offices in Europe and Asia, operating as an investment management firm;

—   for Telereal Trillium: property management company operating in property partnerships, investment, development and strategic land;

—   for the Real Estate JV: the commercial estate business of Network Rail Infrastructure Limited, which is a public sector body that manages Britain’s railway infrastructure in England, Wales and Scotland.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018401EN.01001301-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9131 — Blackstone/Telereal Trillium/Real Estate JV

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018401EN.01001301-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018401EN.01001301-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
# C_2017384EN.01001202.xml

| 14.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 384/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 384/12

---

RESEARCH EXECUTIVE AGENCY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2016

(2017/C 384/45)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/final_annual_account_2016_.pdf

---