alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 22, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 22, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21D0401. IN THE INTEREST OF C. C. E., A CHILD (MOTHER) .

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Juvenile Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

12920J106
Bryan Lamon BURNETT, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6791

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
September 23, 1997

Smith Barney Muni Funds,
388 Greenwich Street,
New York, New York 10013

Dear Sirs:

	In connection with the registration under the Securities Act 
of 1933 (the "Act") of shares (the "Shares") of beneficial 
interest, par value $.001 per share, of Smith Barney Muni Funds, a 
Massachusetts business trust (the "Trust"), we, as your counsel, 
have examined such trust records, certificates and other 
documents, and such questions of law, as we have considered 
necessary or appropriate for the purposes of this opinion.

	Upon the basis of such examination, we advise you that, in 
our opinion, when the Shares are issued and sold in accordance 
with the Trust's Registration Statement on Form N-14 (File No. 33-
12709) under the Act in connection with the acquisition by the 
Trust on behalf of the National Portfolio of all or substantially 
all of the assets, and the assumption of certain liabilities, of 
the Ohio Portfolio, another series of the Trust, and in accordance 
with the Declaration of Trust and By-laws of the Trust, the Shares 
will be validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable by the Trust.

	Under Massachusetts law, shareholders of a Massachusetts 
business trust may, under certain circumstances, be held 
personally liable for the obligations of Smith Barney Muni Funds.  
The Declaration of Trust provides, however, that if a shareholder, 
as such, of Smith Barney Muni Funds is made a party to any suit or 
proceeding to enforce any personal liability, Smith Barney Muni 
Funds shall indemnify and hold each such shareholder harmless from  
and against all claims and liabilities to which such shareholder 
may become subject by reason of his being or having been a 
shareholder.  Thus, the risk of a shareholder's incurring 
financial loss on account of shareholder's liability is limited to 
circumstances in which Smith Barney Muni Funds itself would be 
unable to meet its obligations.

	The foregoing opinion is limited to the laws of the 
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and we are expressing no opinion as 
to the effect of the laws of any other jurisdiction.  With respect 
to all matters of Massachusetts law we have, with your approval, 
relied upon the opinion dated September 23, 1997 of Goodwin, 
Procter & Hoar, and our opinion is subject to the same 
assumptions, qualifications and limitations with respect to such 
matters as are contained in such opinion of Goodwin, Procter & 
Hoar.  We believe you and we are justified in relying on such 
opinion for such matters.

	Also, we have relied as to certain matters on information 
obtained from public officials, officers of the Trust and other 
sources believed by us to be responsible.

	We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an
exhibit to the Trust's Registration Statement.  In giving such consent,
we do not thereby admit that we are in the category of persons whose
consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933.

Very truly yours,

/s/Sullivan & Cromwell
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

RUSSELL K. HILL

, )

)

P etitioner

, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 23

- 2270 (UNA)

)

UNITED STATES, et al.

, )

)

Respondent s

. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Petitioner Russell K. Hill is a Mississippi prisoner who currently is incarcerated at the

Marshall County Correctional Facility in Holly Springs, Mississippi. Generally, petitioner

challenges the Mississippi courts’ jurisdiction and demands his immediate rel ease from custody.

A habeas action is subject to jurisdictional and statutory limitations. See Braden v. 30th

Judicial Cir. Ct. of Ky. , 410 U.S. 484 , 495 (1973). The proper respondent in a habeas corpus

action is a petitioner’s custodian, who ordinarily is the warden of the facility where a petitioner is

d etained

. Rumsfeld v. Padilla , 542 U.S. 426, 434‒35 (2004). And this “district court may not

entertain a habeas petition involving prese nt physical custody unless the respondent custodian is

within its territorial jurisdiction

. ” Stokes v. U.S. Parole Comm’n , 374 F.3d 1235, 1239 (D.C. Cir.

2004). The petition neither names petitioner’s custodian as a respondent, nor demonstrates that

the proper respondent is in the District of Columbia.

The Court will grant petitioner ’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2),

deny his motion for a three

- judge panel (ECF No. 3)

, and dismiss his petition (ECF No. 1) without

prejudice for want of jurisdiction. A separate order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.2 DATE: August 29, 2023 _______________________

CARL J. NICHOLS

United States District Judge
Javon Laren MARTIN, Petitioner, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

No. 19-5761

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# C_2018120EN.01002201.xml

| 6.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 120/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 120/22

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.8770 — Prysmian/General Cable)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 120/09)

| 1. | On 28 March 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1), whereby Prysmian S.p.A. (‘Prysmian’, Italy) acquires control of General Cable Corporation (‘General Cable’, United States), by way of purchase of shares. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 28 March 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1), whereby Prysmian S.p.A. (‘Prysmian’, Italy) acquires control of General Cable Corporation (‘General Cable’, United States), by way of purchase of shares.

1

| 2. | Both Prysmian and General Cable are active in the production and sale of cable and cable systems, mainly in the energy cable and telecom cable sectors. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Both Prysmian and General Cable are active in the production and sale of cable and cable systems, mainly in the energy cable and telecom cable sectors.

| 3. | On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

| 4. | The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
  Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
  M.8770 — Prysmian/General Cable
  Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:





  Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| --- | --- |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.8770 — Prysmian/General Cable

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000919557
<NAME> Smith Barney High Income Portfolio
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER>009
   <NAME>Travelers Series Fund Inc.

<S>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>            Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     Oct-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                          Oct-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                 207,314,847
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                185,183,572
<RECEIVABLES>                           6,698,258
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                815
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        191,882,645
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                  821,369
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                         0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                 393,981
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                     1,215,350
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                 0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>              224,316,740
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                  18,521,886
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                  16,972,702
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>              21,600,913
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                          0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>               (33,731,311)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                        0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>              (21,519,047)
<NET-ASSETS>                          190,667,295
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                         106,479
<INTEREST-INCOME>                      22,339,369
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  0
<EXPENSES-NET>                          1,334,649
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                21,111,199
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>              (17,826,066)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>             (10,281,854)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                  (6,996,721)
<EQUALIZATION>                                  0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>             (18,161,848)
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                        0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                           0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                 2,326,420
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>             2,444,991
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                     1,667,755
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                 (8,337,096)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                18,142,914
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>             (15,396,295)
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                         0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                      0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                   1,211,048
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                         1,334,649
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                  200,697,722
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                      11.720
<PER-SHARE-NII>                             1.200
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                    (1.560)
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                        1.070
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                   0.000
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                        0.000
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                        10.290
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                              0.66



</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

CLAY CALDWELL,

Petitioner

v.

HON. JUDGE FARLEY TOOTHMAN,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 52 WM 2015

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22nd day of October, 2015, the Application for Extraordinary

Relief is DENIED , and the Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist

from the caption.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Denise Barton, Chief Financial Officer of Atlantic Coast Entertainment Holdings, Inc. (the
Registrant), certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 of the Registrant (the Report):  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. By:
    
    /s/ Denise BartonDenise BartonChief Financial Officer ofAtlantic Coast Entertainment Holdings, Inc.Date:
    
    May 10, 2005
 1
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MA Y 30, 2019

NO. 03

- 19

- 00088

- CR

Matthew James Farrell, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 433RD DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, B AKER AND TRIANA DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the district court’s order concluding that it lacked jurisdiction to consider

Appellant’s Mo tion to Set Aside Conviction and Dismiss Charges

. Having reviewed the record,

it appears that th is Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court dismisses the

appeal for want of jurisdiction

. A ppellant shall pay all costs relating to t his appeal, both in this

Court and in the court below.
----

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE XVI

TRANS-EUROPEAN NETWORKS

Article 172

(ex Article 156 TEC)

The guidelines and other measures referred to in Article 171(1) shall be adopted by the European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and after consulting the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.

Guidelines and projects of common interest which relate to the territory of a Member State shall require the approval of the Member State concerned.

----
Faye Beatrice HAYES, Petitioner v. Terri GORMAN, et al.

No. 18-9593

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 16, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
Dexter EDWARDS, dba Edwards Land and Cattle, Petitioner v. GENEX COOPERATIVE, INC.

No. 19-526

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  /s/ Richard W. McCullough                    |   | December 15, 2010 |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------|
| Richard W. McCullough                              |   |
| Chief Executive Officer                            |   |
| Petroleum Development Corporation (dba PDC Energy) |   |
| Managing General Partner                           |   |
|                                               |   |
|  /s/ Gysle R. Shellum                         |   | December 15, 2010 |
| Gysle R. Shellum                                   |   |
| Chief Financial Officer                            |   |
| Petroleum Development Corporation (dba PDC Energy) |   |
| Managing General Partner                           |   |

----
Independent Auditors' Report


To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
the Smith Barney Money Funds, Inc.:

In planning and performing our audits of the financial statements
of Smith Barney Money Funds, Inc. (the Funds) consisting of Cash
Portfolio, Government Portfolio, and Retirement Portfolio for the
year ended December 31, 2002, we considered their internal
control, including control activities for safeguarding
securities, in order to determine our auditing procedures for the
purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and
to comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide
assurance on internal control.

The management of the Funds is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Those controls include the safeguarding of assets against
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, error or
fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any
evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to
the risk that it may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in internal control that might be material
weaknesses under standards established by the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness is a
condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the
internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low
level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in
amounts that would be material in relation to the financial
statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a
timely period by employees in the normal course of performing
their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters involving
internal control and its operation, including controls for
safeguarding securities that we consider to be material
weaknesses as defined above as of December 31, 2002.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management and the Board of Directors of the Funds and the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not intended to be and
should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.


                                                  KPMG LLP

New York, New York
February 12, 2003
---

Exhibit: 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Global Wide Publication Ltd.,(the "Company") on 10Q SB for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lesia Ozer, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                          
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: August 12, 2004.

/s/Lesia Ozer
  Lesia Ozer

Chief Financial Officer
  (Title)

---
Ex-10.157A



 



EXHIBIT 10.17(a)


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



     THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”)
is made as of this 15th day of December, 2003, by and between Mylan
Laboratories Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (the “Company”), and John P.
O’Donnell (“Executive”).


     WHEREAS, the Company and Executive are party to that certain Executive
Employment Agreement dated as of July 22, 2002 (the “Agreement”), pursuant to
which the Company agrees to employ Executive, and Executive accepts such
employment, as more particularly described in the Agreement; and


     WHEREAS, as permitted by Section 15 of the Agreement, the Company and
Executive desire to amend the Agreement, upon the terms and conditions set
forth herein;


     NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be
legally bound, agree as follows:


     1.     The Agreement is hereby amended to add the following new subsection
(g) at the end of Section 8 thereof:



		
	 	     “(g) Death. The employment of Executive shall automatically
terminate upon Executive’s death. For all purposes of this Agreement,
any such termination shall be treated in the same manner as a termination
without Cause, as described in Section 8(c) of this Agreement, and
Executive’s estate shall receive all consideration, compensation and
benefits that would be due and payable to Executive for a termination
without Cause.”



     2.     (a) The parties acknowledge and agree that this Amendment is an
integral part of the Agreement. Notwithstanding any provision of the Agreement
to the contrary, in the event of any
conflict between this Amendment and the Agreement or any part of either of
them, the terms of this Amendment shall control.


             (b) Except as expressly set forth herein, the terms and conditions of the
Agreement are and shall remain in full force and effect.



             (c) The Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, sets forth the entire
understanding of the parties with respect to the subject matter thereof and
hereof.



             (d) This Amendment shall be governed by, interpreted under and construed
in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.



             (e) This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of
which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute one and the same
document.




 






 





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been duly executed and delivered as
of the day and year first above written.



	 	 	 
	 	MYLAN LABORATORIES
INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	 /s/ Robert J. Coury
	 	 	

	 	Name: Robert J. Coury
	 	Title: Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer




	 	 
	 	      /s/ John P. O’Donnell
	 	

	 	John P. O’Donnell



2
Josue Emmanuel MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6747.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Mark A. BLANKENSHIP, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9370

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 07, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.