Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 117 / Friday, June 17, 2022 / Proposed Rules 36415 

List of Subjects 

7 CFR Part 920 

Kiwifruit, Marketing agreements, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

7 CFR Part 944 

Avocados, Food grades and standards, 

Grapefruit, Grapes, Imports, Kiwifruit, 

Limes, Olives, Oranges, Plums, Prunes. 

For the reasons set forth in the 

preamble, the Agricultural Marketing 

Service proposes to amend 7 CFR parts 

920 and 944 as follows: 

PART 920—KIWIFRUIT GROWN IN 

CALIFORNIA 

■ 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR 

part 920 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674. 

■ 2. Amend § 920.302 by: 

■ a. Revising paragraphs (a)(2), (a)(4) 

heading, and (a)(4)(i); and 

■ b. In paragraph (a)(4)(ii)(A): 

■ i. Designating the table as table 1 to 

paragraph (a)(4)(ii)(A); 

■ ii. Revising the three column 

headings; 

■ iii. Removing the entry for ‘‘45 or 

smaller’’ and adding an entry for ‘‘45’’ 

in its place; and 

■ iv. Adding an entry for ‘‘49’’ in 

numerical order and footnotes 1 and 2 

at the end of the table. 

The revisions and additions read as 

follows: 

§ 920.302 Grade, size, pack, and container 

regulations. 

(a) * * * 

(2) Size requirements. Such kiwifruit, 

except for varieties of the Actinidia 

chinensis species, shall be at least a 

minimum Size 45, defined as a 

maximum of 55 pieces of fruit in an 8- 

pound sample. Varieties of the Actinidia 

chinensis species shall be at least a 

minimum Size 49, defined as a 

maximum of 64 pieces of fruit in an 8- 

pound sample. 

* * * * * 

(4) Pack requirements. (i) Kiwifruit 

packed in containers with cell 

compartments, cardboard fillers, or 

molded trays shall be of proper size for 

the cells, fillers, or molds in which they 

are packed. Such fruit, except for 

varieties of the Actinidia chinensis 

species, shall be fairly uniform in size. 

(ii)(A) * * * 

TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (a)(4)(ii)(A)—SIZE DESIGNATION AND SIZE VARIATION CHART

Size designation 

Maximum number 

of fruit per 

8-pound sample 

Size variation tolerance 

(diameter) 1

*******

45 ....................................................................................................................................................... 55 1⁄4-inch (6.4 mm). 

49 2 ..................................................................................................................................................... 64 Not applicable. 

1 Not applicable to Actinidia chinensis species varieties. 2Applicable only to Actinidia chinensis species varieties. 

* * * * * 

PART 944—FRUITS; IMPORT 

REGULATIONS 

■ 3. The authority citation for 7 CFR 

part 944 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674. 

■ 4. Amend § 944.550 by revising 

paragraph (a) to read as follows: 

§ 944.550 Kiwifruit import regulation. 

(a) Pursuant to section 8e of the 

Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act 

of 1937, as amended, the importation 

into the United States of any kiwifruit 

is prohibited unless such kiwifruit 

meets all the requirements of a U.S. No. 

1 grade as defined in the United States 

Standards for Grades of Kiwifruit (7 CFR 

51.2335 through 51.2340), except that 

the kiwifruit shall be ‘‘not badly 

misshapen,’’ and an additional tolerance 

of 16 percent is provided for kiwifruit 

that is ‘‘badly misshapen,’’ and except 

that such kiwifruit shall have a 

minimum of 6.2 percent soluble solids. 

Such fruit, except for varieties of the 

Actinidia chinensis species, shall be at 

least Size 45, which means there shall 

be a maximum of 55 pieces of fruit in 

an 8-pound sample. Varieties of the 

Actinidia chinensis species shall be at 

least Size 49, which means there shall 

be a maximum of 64 pieces of fruit in 

an 8-pound sample. The average weight 

of all samples in a specific lot must 

weigh at least 8 pounds (3.632 

kilograms), provided that no individual 

sample may be less than 7 pounds 12 

ounces (3.472 kilograms). 

* * * * * 

Erin Morris, 

Associate Administrator, Agricultural 

Marketing Service. 

[FR Doc. 2022–13004 Filed 6–16–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2022–0599; Project 

Identifier MCAI–2021–00456–A] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Piaggio Aero 

Industries S.p.A. Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a 

new airworthiness directive (AD) for 

certain Piaggio Aero Industries S.p.A. 

(Piaggio) Model P–180 airplanes. This 

proposed AD results from mandatory 

continuing airworthiness information 

(MCAI) originated by an aviation 

authority of another country to identify 

and correct an unsafe condition on an 

aviation product. The MCAI identifies 

the unsafe condition as corrosion in the 

bottom fuselage area of the cabin 

compartment due to inner and outer 

sides of fuselage skin panels of certain 

airplanes treated with the less effective 

primer. This proposed AD would 

require repetitively inspecting the 

fuselage skin panels, visually inspecting 

the entire fuselage inner side skin if 

necessary, and taking any necessary 

corrective actions. The FAA is 

proposing this AD to address the unsafe 

condition on these products. 

DATES: The FAA must receive comments 

on this proposed AD by August 1, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 

11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following 

methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: (202) 493–2251. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
36416 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 117 / Friday, June 17, 2022 / Proposed Rules 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, 

M–30, West Building Ground Floor, 

Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail 

address above between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. 

For service information identified in 

this NPRM, contact Piaggio Aero 

Industries S.p.A, P180 Customer 

Support, via Pionieri e Aviatori d’Italia, 

snc—16154 Genoa, Italy; phone: +39 

331 679 74 93; email: technicalsupport@

piaggioaerospace.it. You may view this 

service information at the FAA, 

Airworthiness Products Section, 

Operational Safety Branch, 901 Locust, 

Kansas City, MO 64106. For information 

on the availability of this material at the 

FAA, call (817) 222–5110. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket at 

https://www.regulations.gov by 

searching for and locating Docket No. 

FAA–2022–0599; or in person at Docket 

Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. The AD docket contains this 

NPRM, the MCAI, any comments 

received, and other information. The 

street address for Docket Operations is 

listed above. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mike Kiesov, Aviation Safety Engineer, 

FAA, General Aviation & Rotorcraft 

Section, International Validation 

Branch, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas 

City, MO 64106; phone: (816) 329–4144; 

email: mike.kiesov@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

The FAA invites you to send any 

written relevant data, views, or 

arguments about this proposal. Send 

your comments to an address listed 

under the ADDRESSES section. Include 

‘‘Docket No. FAA–2022–0599; Project 

Identifier MCAI–2021–00456–A’’ at the 

beginning of your comments. The most 

helpful comments reference a specific 

portion of the proposal, explain the 

reason for any recommended change, 

and include supporting data. The FAA 

will consider all comments received by 

the closing date and may amend this 

NPRM because of those comments. 

Except for Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) as described in the 

following paragraph, and other 

information as described in 14 CFR 

11.35, the FAA will post all comments 

received, without change, to https://

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information you provide. The 

agency will also post a report 

summarizing each substantive verbal 

contact received about this NPRM. 

Confidential Business Information 

CBI is commercial or financial 

information that is both customarily and 

actually treated as private by its owner. 

Under the Freedom of Information Act 

(FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt 

from public disclosure. If your 

comments responsive to this NPRM 

contain commercial or financial 

information that is customarily treated 

as private, that you actually treat as 

private, and that is relevant or 

responsive to this NPRM, it is important 

that you clearly designate the submitted 

comments as CBI. Please mark each 

page of your submission containing CBI 

as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA will treat such 

marked submissions as confidential 

under the FOIA, and they will not be 

placed in the public docket of this AD. 

Submissions containing CBI should be 

sent to Mike Kiesov, Aviation Safety 

Engineer, FAA, General Aviation & 

Rotorcraft Section, International 

Validation Branch, 901 Locust, Room 

301, Kansas City, MO 64106. Any 

commentary that the FAA receives 

which is not specifically designated as 

CBI will be placed in the public docket 

for this rulemaking. 

Background 

The European Union Aviation Safety 

Agency (EASA), which is the Technical 

Agent for the Member States of the 

European Union, has issued EASA AD 

2021–0104, dated April 15, 2021 

(referred to after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to 

address the unsafe condition on certain 

serial-numbered Piaggio Model P.180 

airplanes. The MCAI states: 

Occurrences were reported where, during 

routine inspections, diffused corrosion was 

detected on the fuselage inner side skin in 

the area of the passenger cabin. Evidence 

indicates that the presence of undetected 

(infiltrated or condensed) water, trapped in 

between the inner surface of fuselage skin 

panels and the thermo-acoustic insulation 

panels, could have started a galvanic 

corrosion phenomenon, mainly in the bottom 

fuselage area of the cabin compartment. 

Fuselage skin panels of certain aeroplanes, 

delivered from 2009 to 2013, were treated 

with the first type of ‘‘chromate-free’’ primer, 

chemically not as effective against corrosion 

when compared to those containing chrome. 

The phenomenon has been observed on 

aeroplanes subjected to prolonged inactivity 

and not stored in a hangar, or those operating 

in an environment with high humidity and/ 

or frequent heavy precipitation, combined 

with a possible deterioration of window 

sealing due to normal aging, wear and tear. 

This condition, if not corrected, could 

affect the structural integrity of the fuselage. 

To address this potential unsafe condition, 

Piaggio published the [Piaggio Service 

Bulletin (SB) 80–0405, Revision 0, dated 

March 15, 2021] SB to provide inspection 

instructions. 

For the reason described above, this 

[EASA] AD requires repetitive inspections of 

each affected area and, if necessary, an 

additional visual inspection of the entire 

fuselage inner side skin and, depending on 

findings, accomplishment of applicable 

repair. This [EASA] AD also requires 

reporting the inspection results to Piaggio. 

You may examine the MCAI in the 

AD docket at https://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2022– 

0599. 

Related Service Information Under 1 

CFR Part 51 

The FAA reviewed Piaggio SB No. 

80–0405, Revision 0, dated March 15, 

2021. This service information specifies 

procedures for inspecting the fuselage 

skin panels and inspecting the full inner 

fuselage skin. It also specifies repairing 

or replacing any parts where corrosion 

is found. 

The FAA also reviewed Piaggio SB 

No. 80–0405, Revision 0, Errata Corrige 

No. 1, dated March 24, 2021, which 

addresses discrepancies identified in 

Piaggio SB No. 80–0405, Revision 0, 

dated March 15, 2021. 

This service information is reasonably 

available because the interested parties 

have access to it through their normal 

course of business or by the means 

identified in the ADDRESSES section. 

FAA’s Determination 

This product has been approved by 

the aviation authority of another 

country and is approved for operation in 

the United States. Pursuant to the FAA’s 

bilateral agreement with this State of 

Design Authority, it has notified the 

FAA of the unsafe condition described 

in the MCAI and service information 

referenced above. The FAA is issuing 

this NPRM after determining the unsafe 

condition described previously is likely 

to exist or develop on other products of 

the same type design. 

Proposed AD Requirements in This 

NPRM 

This proposed AD would require 

accomplishing the actions specified in 

the service information already 

described. 

Differences Between This Proposed AD 

and the MCAI or Service Information 

The MCAI allows credit for the 

fuselage inner skin inspection if 

previously done using Piaggio 

Aerospace Temporary Revision No. 332 

to Chapter 53–00–00 of Piaggio P.180 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 117 / Friday, June 17, 2022 / Proposed Rules 36417 

Avanti II Maintenance Manual, and this 

proposed AD would not. The FAA will 

consider requests for an alternative 

method of compliance for this under 

paragraph (h) of this AD. 

The MCAI specifies compliance times 

of 8 months and 12 months depending 

on when the P–180 airplane 

maintenance manual 3,600 flight hour 

or 5-year inspection was accomplished. 

This proposed AD has a 12-month 

compliance time for all airplanes 

because the 3,600 flight hour and 5-year 

maintenance manual inspections are not 

required for U.S. operators by FAA 

regulation. 

The service information specifies 

contacting Piaggio for certain repair 

instructions, while this proposed AD 

would require repair using a method 

approved by the FAA or EASA. 

Costs of Compliance 

The FAA estimates that this AD, if 

adopted as proposed, would affect 14 

airplanes of U.S. registry. 

The FAA estimates the following 

costs to comply with this proposed AD: 

ESTIMATED COSTS

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per 

airplane 

Cost on U.S. 

operators 

Inspections .......................... Up to 150 work-hours × $85 per hour = $12,750 ........... $2,360 Up to $15,110 ..... Up to $211,540. 

The FAA estimates the following 

costs to do any necessary actions that 

may be required based on the results of 

the proposed inspections. The FAA has 

no way of estimating the number of 

airplanes that might need these actions: 

ON-CONDITION COSTS

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per 

airplane 

Repair ............................ Up to 80 work-hours × $85 per hour = $6,800 ............................................. $1,220 .................... Up to $8,020. 

Replace skin panel ........ Up to 250 work-hours × $85 per hour = $21,250 ......................................... Up to $12,200 ........ Up to $33,450. 

Reporting Results .......... 1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 ................................................................ Not Applicable ....... $1,190. 

Paperwork Reduction Act 

A federal agency may not conduct or 

sponsor, and a person is not required to 

respond to, nor shall a person be subject 

to a penalty for failure to comply with 

a collection of information subject to the 

requirements of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act unless that collection of 

information displays a currently valid 

OMB Control Number. The OMB 

Control Number for this information 

collection is 2120–0056. Public 

reporting for this collection of 

information is estimated to be 

approximately 1 hour per response, 

including the time for reviewing 

instructions, searching existing data 

sources, gathering and maintaining the 

data needed, completing and reviewing 

the collection of information. All 

responses to this collection of 

information are mandatory. Send 

comments regarding this burden 

estimate or any other aspect of this 

collection of information, including 

suggestions for reducing this burden, to: 

Information Collection Clearance 

Officer, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 10101 Hillwood 

Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177–1524. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

The FAA is issuing this rulemaking 

under the authority described in 

Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 

44701: General requirements. Under 

that section, Congress charges the FAA 

with promoting safe flight of civil 

aircraft in air commerce by prescribing 

regulations for practices, methods, and 

procedures the Administrator finds 

necessary for safety in air commerce. 

This regulation is within the scope of 

that authority because it addresses an 

unsafe condition that is likely to exist or 

develop on products identified in this 

rulemaking action. 

Regulatory Findings 

The FAA determined that this 

proposed AD would not have federalism 

implications under Executive Order 

13132. This proposed AD would not 

have a substantial direct effect on the 

States, on the relationship between the 

national Government and the States, or 

on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify this proposed regulation: 

(1) Is not be a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 

(2) Would not affect intrastate 

aviation in Alaska, and 

(3) Would not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 

39 as follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new airworthiness 

directive: 

Piaggio Aero Industries S.p.A.: Docket No. 

FAA–2022–0599; Project Identifier 

MCAI–2021–00456–A. 

(a) Comments Due Date 

The FAA must receive comments on this 

airworthiness directive (AD) by August 1, 

2022. 

(b) Affected ADs 

None. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
36418 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 117 / Friday, June 17, 2022 / Proposed Rules 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to Piaggio Aero Industries 

S.p.A. (Piaggio) Model P–180 airplanes, serial 

numbers (S/N) 1174 through 1214 inclusive 

and S/N 1218 through 1230 inclusive, 

certificated in any category. 

(d) Subject 

Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) 

Code 5330, Fuselage Main, Plate/Skin. 

(e) Unsafe Condition 

This AD was prompted by mandatory 

continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) 

originated by an aviation authority of another 

country to identify and correct an unsafe 

condition on an aviation product. The MCAI 

identifies the unsafe condition as corrosion 

in the bottom fuselage area of the cabin 

compartment due to inner and outer sides of 

fuselage skin panels treated with less 

effective primer. The FAA is issuing this AD 

to prevent degradation of the structural 

integrity of the fuselage. This condition, if 

not addressed, could lead to loss of control 

of the airplane. 

(f) Compliance 

Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. 

(g) Required Actions 

(1) Within 12 months after the effective 

date of this AD, do the applicable inspections 

and corrective actions on each fuselage wing 

skin panel in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions, Part A, 

paragraphs (1) through (15) and (17) through 

(20), or Part A (Alternate Procedure), 

paragraphs (31) through (37), (41) through 

(43), (50) through (55), and (57) through (60), 

in Piaggio Service Bulletin 80–0405, Revision 

0, dated March 15, 2021, as corrected by 

Piaggio Service Bulletin 80–0405, Revision 0, 

Errata Corrige No. 1, dated March 24, 2021 

(Piaggio SB 80–0405), except for the 

following: 

(i) You are not required to contact the 

manufacturer. Instead, for any repairs, use a 

method approved by the FAA or the 

European Union Aviation Safety Agency 

(EASA). 

(ii) Where the steps in Part A or Part A 

(Alternate Procedure) reference Part B, you 

must follow the Accomplishment 

Instructions, Part B, paragraphs (82) through 

(86), (88), and (104) of Piaggio SB 80–0405. 

(2) If, as part of the corrective actions 

required by paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, you 

repaired areas of the fuselage skin but did not 

replace the panels, do the following: 

(i) Within 60 days after completing the 

actions required by paragraph (g)(1) of this 

AD, report the inspection results, including 

the information specified in the Confirmation 

Slip attached to Piaggio SB 80–0405, to 

Piaggio at technicalsupport@

piaggioaerospace.it; and 

(ii) Repeat the requirements of paragraph 

(g)(1) of this AD at intervals not to exceed 

660 hours time-in-service (TIS) or 26 months, 

whichever occurs first. 

(3) If, as part of the corrective actions 

required by paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, you 

replaced the panels, within 60 days after 

completing the actions required by paragraph 

(g)(1) of this AD, report the inspection 

results, including the information specified 

in the Confirmation Slip attached to Piaggio 

SB 80–0405, to Piaggio at technicalsupport@

piaggioaerospace.it. 

(4) If, during all of the inspections required 

by paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, there is no 

corrosion and no primer inconsistencies, no 

further action is required by this AD. 

(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(1) The Manager, International Validation 

Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve 

AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the 

procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In 

accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your 

request to your principal inspector or local 

Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the manager of the certification office, 

send it to the attention of the person 

identified in paragraph (i)(1) of this AD and 

email to: 9-AVS-AIR-730-AMOC@faa.gov. 

(2) Before using any approved AMOC, 

notify your appropriate principal inspector, 

or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 

of the local flight standards district office/ 

certificate holding district office. 

(i) Related Information 

(1) For more information about this AD, 

contact Mike Kiesov, Aviation Safety 

Engineer, FAA, General Aviation & Rotorcraft 

Section, International Validation Branch, 901 

Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, MO 64106; 

phone: (816) 329–4144; email: mike.kiesov@

faa.gov. 

(2) Refer to EASA AD 2021–0104, dated 

April 15, 2021, for more information. You 

may view the EASA AD at https://

www.regulations.gov in Docket No. FAA– 

2022–0599. 

(3) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Piaggio Aero Industries 

S.p.A, P180 Customer Support, via Pionieri 

e Aviatori d’Italia, snc—16154 Genoa, Italy; 

phone: +39 331 679 74 93; email: 

technicalsupport@piaggioaerospace.it. You 

may view this service information at the 

FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, 

Operational Safety Branch, 901 Locust, 

Kansas City, MO 64106. For information on 

the availability of this material at the FAA, 

call (817) 222–5110. 

Issued on June 13, 2022. 

Christina Underwood, 

Acting Director, Compliance & Airworthiness 

Division, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2022–13050 Filed 6–16–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2022–0686; Project 

Identifier MCAI–2022–00088–T] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS 

Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a 

new airworthiness directive (AD) for all 

Airbus SAS Model A350–941 airplanes. 

This proposed AD was prompted by a 

report indicating that the inflatable free 

aisle restrictor (IFAR) on certain single 

lane slide-rafts demonstrated 

inconsistent release behavior in aft wind 

conditions. This proposed AD would 

require replacing an affected part with 

a serviceable part, as specified in a 

European Union Aviation Safety Agency 

(EASA) AD, which is proposed for 

incorporation by reference. This 

proposed AD would also prohibit the 

installation of affected parts. The FAA 

is proposing this AD to address the 

unsafe condition on these products. 

DATES: The FAA must receive comments 

on this proposed AD by August 1, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 

11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following 

methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: 202–493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, 

M–30, West Building Ground Floor, 

Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail 

address above between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. 

For material that will be incorporated 

by reference (IBR) in this AD, contact 

EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 

Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 

8999 000; email ADs@easa.europa.eu; 

internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may 

find this material on the EASA website 

at https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may 

view this material at the FAA, 

Airworthiness Products Section, 

Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 

216th St., Des Moines, WA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1