alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.b

I, Marc N. Teal, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund V L.P.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





|February 21, 2006 | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|----------------- | ---------------------------
|                  | Marc N. Teal               
|                  | Principal Financial Officer
|                  |
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018265EN.01001601.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 27.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 265/16 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9045 — Blackstone/Averys)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 265/07)

1.

On 20 July 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018265EN.01001601-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Blackstone Group L.P. (‘Blackstone’, United States), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Financière Efel SAS (‘Averys’, France). |

Blackstone acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Averys.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Blackstone: asset management and financial advisory services,

—   for Averys: manufacture of customised racking and storage solutions for warehouses, with brands such as Stow, Storax, Feralco, Duwic and Acial.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018265EN.01001601-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9045 — Blackstone/Averys

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018265EN.01001601-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018265EN.01001601-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
THRYV, INC., fka Dex Media, Inc., petitioner, v. CLICK-TO-CALL TECHNOLOGIES, LP, et al.

No. 18-916.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 23, 2019.

Motion of petitioner to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/15/14          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      368,887
COMMITMENTS
  96,296  132,242   87,262  162,952  122,146  346,510  341,650   22,377   27,237

CHANGES FROM 04/08/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      8,935)
  -8,800   -4,600   -2,820   18,906   15,935    7,286    8,515    1,649      420

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    26.1     35.8     23.7     44.2     33.1     93.9     92.6      6.1      7.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      183)
      56       72       72       39       37      138      149
```

----

Updated April 18, 2014
No. 6:23-cv-00321

Paul J. Connall,

Plaintiff,

v.

Warden MTC-ISF, et al.,

Defendants.

ORD ER

Plaintiff Paul Connall, proceeding pro se, filed this civil-rights 

lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to 

United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love, who issued a report 

and recommendation (Doc. 7) concluding that plaintiff’s complaint 

should be dismissed with prejudice for purposes of in forma pauperis

proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

The report and recommendation was returned undeliverable 

(Doc. 8), and plaintiff has not updated his address with the court or 

filed objections to the report and recommendation. When no party 

objects to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the 

court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. 

Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the 

magistrate judge’s report and being satisfied that it contains no clear 

error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation. For the 

reasons stated in the report, plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed with

prejudice for purposes of in forma pauperis proceedings pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff may resume his lawsuit if he pays the 

entire filing fee of $402 within fifteen days after the entry of the final 

judgment.

Case 6:23-cv-00321-JCB-JDL Document 9 Filed 08/14/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 8
So ordered by the court on August 14, 2023.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cv-00321-JCB-JDL Document 9 Filed 08/14/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 9
Andrew J.J. WOLF, et al., Petitioners, v. IDAHO BOARD OF CORRECTION, et al.

No. 19-6668.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 26, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7178

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DENNIS CARL HARRIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-92-113-N, CA-97-389-2)

Submitted: May 18, 1999 Decided: May 27, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Edward Schwartz, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant. Laura

Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Dennis Carl Harris seeks to appeal the district court’s orders

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See United States v. Harris, Nos. CR-92-

113-N; CA-97-389-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 13, 1998; July 15, 1998). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 11761]

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Cultural Heritage Center, U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 2200 C Street NW, Washington, DC 20522. Telephone: (202) 702-1166; Email                         *culprop@state.gov.*

Allison Davis,

Executive Director, Cultural Property Advisory Committee, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2022-12866 Filed 6-14-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Gilbert P. HYATT, et al., Petitioners, v. Andrei IANCU, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office

No. 18-1285

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
IN RE Richard Arjun KAUL, Petitioner

No. 19-5873

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 12, 2019

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
# C_2018281EN.01000101.xml

| 10.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8975 — CVC Capital Partners/Mehiläinen Holding)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 281/01)

On 13 July 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8975. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8975. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
1. I have reviewed this report
          on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of BMW Vehicle Owner Trust 2018-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);
  2. Based on my knowledge, the
          Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3. Based on my knowledge, all
          of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
  4. I am responsible for
          reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in
          the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and
 5. All of the reports on
          assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
          accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports
          have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
    
 BMW FINANCIAL SERVICES NA, LLCBy:
          /s/ Stefan KramerName:
          Stefan KramerTitle:
          Vice President – Finance & CFO
Jaonte HAIRSTON, Petitioner v. OHIO, et al.

No. 19-327

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio denied.
IN RE Benny STEWART, Petitioner.

No. 18-9561

Supreme Court of the United States.

Nov. 18, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
the National Portfolio of the Smith Barney Muni Funds:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements
of the National Portfolio of the Smith Barney Muni Funds (the
"Fund") for the year ended March 31, 1998, we considered its
internal control, including control activities for safeguarding
securities, in order to determine our auditing procedures for the
purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and
to comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide
assurance on the internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles. Those controls include the safeguarding of
assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or
irregularities may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection
of any evaluation of internal control to future periods is
subject to the risk that it may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and
operation may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in the internal control that might be
material weaknesses under standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness
is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of
the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively
low level the risk that errors or irregularities in amounts that
would be material in relation to the financial statements being
audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by
employees in the normal course of performing their assigned
functions.  However, we noted no matters involving the internal
control and its operation, including controls for safeguarding
securities that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined
above.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management, the Board of Directors of the Fund, and the
Securities and Exchange Commission.



May 15, 1998
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018376EN.01003101.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 18.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 376/31 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9050 — Hammerson/M&G/Highcross)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 376/07)

1.

On 11 October 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018376EN.01003101-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Hammerson plc (‘Hammerson’, United Kingdom), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | M&G Limited (‘M&G’, United Kingdom), belonging to Prudential plc (‘Prudential’, United Kingdom). |

Hammerson and M&G acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and Article 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of Highcross shopping centre in Leicester (United Kingdom), which is currently solely controlled by Hammerson.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Hammerson: commercial real estate development and ownership-management of retail property in Europe. Its portfolio includes investments in prime shopping centres in the United Kingdom, Ireland and France, retail parks in the United Kingdom and premium retail outlets across Europe,

—   for M&G: wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of Prudential, an international financial services group. Amongst other investments, Prudential invests on behalf of its clients in property, primarily through the M&G Real Estate brand.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018376EN.01003101-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9050 — Hammerson/M&G/Highcross

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018376EN.01003101-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018376EN.01003101-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
Brenda Ford WHITE, Petitioner, v. O.L. MATTHEWS, et al.

No. 19-8116.

Supreme Court of the United States.

June 1, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

VIRTAMOVE, CORP., CASE NO. 2:24-cv-00093-JRG 

 (Lead Case)

Plaintiff,

v.

HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE 

COMPANY,

Defendant.

VIRTAMOVE, CORP., CASE NO. 2:24-cv-00064-JRG 

 (Member Case)

Plaintiff,

v.

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES 

CORP.,

Defendant.

DEFENDANT’S NOTICE OF DESIGNATION OF LEAD COUNSEL

COMES NOW, Defendant International Business Machines Corp. (“IBM”) hereby notifies 

the Court and all parties of record that Todd M. Friedman, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, 601 Lexington 

Avenue, New York, New York 10022, is designated as lead counsel for Defendant IBM in the 

above-captioned case.

Dated: April 17, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Todd M. Friedman

Todd M. Friedman (pro hac vice)

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

601 Lexington Avenue

New York, NY 10022

Telephone: (212) 446-4800

Facsimile: (212) 446-4900

Email: todd.friedman@kirkland.com

Case 2:24-cv-00093-JRG Document 33 Filed 04/17/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 149
2

Brandon H. Brown

State Bar No. 266347

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

555 California Street

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 439-1400

Facsimile: (415) 439-1500

Email: brandon.brown@kirkland.com

Of Counsel:

Andrea L. Fair 

Texas State Bar No. 24078488

Email: andrea@wsfirm.com

WARD, SMITH & HILL, PLLC

1507 Bill Owens Parkway

Longview, TX 75604

(903) 757-6400 (telephone)

(903) 757-2323 (facsimile)

Attorneys for Defendant

International Business Machines Corp.

Case 2:24-cv-00093-JRG Document 33 Filed 04/17/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 150
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have 

consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s 

CM/ECF system pursuant to Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on April 17, 2024.

/s/ Todd M. Friedman

Todd M. Friedman

Case 2:24-cv-00093-JRG Document 33 Filed 04/17/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 151