35738 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 113 / Monday, June 13, 2022 / Notices 

31Commerce determined that Pro-Team and PT 

Enterprise comprise a single entity in Certain Steel 

Nails from Taiwan: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Partial Rescission of Administrative Review; 2015– 

2016, 82 FR 36744 (August 7, 2017), unchanged in 

Certain Steel Nails from Taiwan: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Partial Rescission of Administrative Review; 2015– 

2016, 83 FR 6163 (February 13, 2018). However, 

Commerce inadvertently listed them separately in 

the Initiation Notice, rather than as a combined 

single entity on a single line. 

32As noted above, PT Enterprise Inc. and Pro 

Team Coil Nail Enterprise Incor. comprise a single 

entity. Commerce inadvertently listed them 

separately in the Initiation Notice, rather than as a 

combined single entity on a single line. 

equal to the dumping margin 

established in the final results of this 

administrative review; (2) for previously 

reviewed or investigated companies not 

listed above, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding in 

which they were reviewed; (3) if the 

exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, a prior review, or in the 

investigation, but the producer is, then 

the cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding 

for the producer of the merchandise; 

and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 

manufacturers or exporters will 

continue to be 2.16 percent, the allothers rate. These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 

the reimbursement of antidumping 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this review 

period. Failure to comply with this 

requirement could result in Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 

sections 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1) and 

351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: June 7, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Discussion of the Methodology 

V. Recommendation 

Appendix II—List of Companies Under 

Review Not Selected for Individual 

Examination 

1. Acu-Transport Co., Ltd. 

2. Allwin Architectural Hardware Inc. 

3. Alsons Manufacturing India LLP 

4. An Chen Fa Machinery Co., Ltd. 

5. Bollore Logistics India Private Ltd. 

6. Bon Voyage Logistics Inc. 

7. Boss Precision Works Co., Ltd. 

8. C.H. Robinson Freight Services Ltd. 

9. C.H.Robinson World Wide India Pvt. Ltd. 

10. Casia Global Logistics Co., Ltd. 

11. Chief Ling Entreprise Co., Ltd 

12. China Intl. Freight Co., Ltd. 

13. China Sea Forwarders Co., Ltd. 

14. Crane Worldwide Logistics LLC 

15. De Well Container Shipping Inc. 

16. DHL Global Forwarding Sg. Pte. Ltd. 

17. Diversified Freight System Corporation 

18. Eusu Logistics Co., Ltd. 

19. Evergreen Logistics Corp. 

20. Everise Global Logistics Co., Ltd. 

21. Grandlink Logistics Co., Ltd. 

22. Honour Lane Logistics Company Ltd. 

23. Honour Lane Shipping Ltd. 

24. Houseware Taiwan Industries Ltd. 

25. Inmax Industries Sdn. Bhd. 

26. K.E. & Kingstone Co., Ltd. 

27. Kay Guay Entreprises Co., Ltd. 

28. Kerry Indev Logistics Private Limited 

29. King Compass Logistics Limited 

30. King Freight International Corp. 

31. Lien Bin Industries Co., Ltd. 

32. New Marine Consolidator Co., Ltd. 

33. NMC Logistics International Co., Ltd. 

34. Oceanlink/Topair International Co. 

35. OEC Freight Worldwide Co., Ltd. 

36. Orient Containers Sdn., Bhd. 

37. Orient Express Container Co., Ltd. 

38. Orient Star International Logistics Co., 

Ltd. 

39. Orient Star Transport International Ltd. 

40. Oriental Vanguard Logistics Co., Ltd. 

41. Pacific Concord International Ltd. 

42. Pacific Star Express Corp. 

43. Panda Logistics Co., Ltd. 

44. Ray Fu Entreprise Co., Ltd. 

45. SAR Transport Systems Pvt. Ltd. 

46. Schenker (H.K.) Ltd. 

47. Storeit Services LLP. 

48. Success Progress International Tran 

49. T.H.I. Logistics Co., Ltd. 

50. T.V.L. Container Line Limited 

51. The Ultimate Freight Management 

(Taiwan) Ltd. 

52. Topocean Consolidation Service (Taiwan) 

Ltd. 

53. Trans Luck Global Logistics Co., Ltd. 

54. Trans Wagon International Co., Ltd. 

55. Transwell Logistics Co., Ltd. 

56. Transworld Transportation Co., Ltd. 

57. UPS Supply Chain Solutions (Taiwan) 

Co., Ltd. 

58. Valuemax Products Co., Ltd. 

59. Worldwide Logistics Co., Ltd. 

Appendix III—Companies Rescinded 

From Review 

1. Aplus Pneumatic Corp. 

2. Bonuts Hardware Logistics Co., Ltd. 

3. Cheng CH International Co., Ltd. 

4. Chia Pao Metal Co., Ltd. 

5. China Staple Enterprise Corporation 

6. Chite Enterprises Co., Ltd. 

7. Crown Run Industrial Corp. 

8. De Fasteners Inc. 

9. Easylink Industrial Co., Ltd. 

10. Encore Green Co., Ltd. 

11. Faithful Engineering Products Co., Ltd. 

12. General Merchandise Consolidators, Inc. 

13. Hor Liang Industrial Corp. 

14. Hoyi Plus Co., Ltd. 

15. Interactive Corp. 

16. Jade Shuttle Enerprise Co., Ltd. 

17. Jau Yeou Industry Co., Ltd. 

18. JC Grand Corporation 

19. Jen Ju Enterprise Co., Ltd. 

20. Jet Crown International Co., Ltd. 

21. Jiajue Industrial Co., Ltd. 

22. Jinsco International Corp. 

23. Ko’s Nail Inc. 

24. Korea Wire Co., Ltd. 

25. Linkwell Industry Co., Ltd. 

26. Locksure Inc. 

27. Lu Kang Hand Tools Industrial Co., Ltd. 

28. Master United Corp. 

29. Maytrans International Corp. 

30. Ming Cheng Hardware Co., Ltd. 

31. Nailermate Enterprise Corporation 

32. Nailtech Co., Ltd. 

33. Newrex Screw Corporation 

34. Panther T&H Industry Co. 

35. Patek Tool Co., Ltd. 

36. Point Edge Corp. 

37. President Industrial Inc. 

38. Pro Team Coil Nail Enterprise Incor.31

39. PT Enterprise, Inc.32

40. Romp Coil Nail Industries Inc. 

41. Shinn Chuen Corp. 

42. Six2 Fastener Imports Inc. 

43. Taiwan Shan Yin International Co., Ltd. 

44. Taiwan Wakisangyo Co., Ltd. 

45. Techart Mechanical Corporation 

46. Test-Rite Int’l Co., Ltd. 

47. Theps Co., Ltd. 

48. Trans-Top Enterprise Co., Ltd. 

49. Trim International Inc. 

50. U-Can-Do Hardware Corp. 

51. UJL Industries Co., Ltd. 

52. Unicatch Industrial Co., Ltd. 

53. Vim International Entreprise Co., Ltd. 

54. Wattson Fastener Group Inc. 

55. Wictory Co., Ltd. 

56. Yehdyi Enterprise Co., Ltd. 

57. Yu Chi Hardware Co., Ltd. 

58. Zhishan Xing Entreprise Co., Ltd. 

59. Zon Mon Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2022–12711 Filed 6–10–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–423–813] 

Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts 

From Belgium: Notice of Initiation and 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Changed Circumstances Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 113 / Monday, June 13, 2022 / Notices 35739 

1See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from 

Belgium, Colombia and Thailand: Antidumping 

Duty Orders, 83 FR 35214 (July 25, 2018) (Order). 

2See Citribel’s Letter, ‘‘Citric Acid and Certain 

Citrate Salts from Belgium—Request for Changed 

Circumstances Review,’’ dated April 27, 2022 (CCR 

Request). 

3See, e.g., Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof 

from the People’s Republic of China: Initiation and 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed 

Circumstances Review, 82 FR 51605, 51606 

(November 7, 2017) (Diamond Sawblades 

Preliminary), unchanged in Diamond Sawblades 

and Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of 

China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed 

Circumstances Review, 82 FR 60177 (December 19, 

2017) (Diamond Sawblades Final). 

4See, e.g., Diamond Sawblades Final; see also 

Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India: 

Initiation and Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 83 FR 37784 

(August 2, 2018), unchanged in Certain Frozen 

Warmwater Shrimp from India: Notice of Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty Changed 

Circumstances Review, 83 FR 49909 (October 3, 

2018). 

5See, e.g., Diamond Sawblades Final; see also 

Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India: 

Initiation and Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 83 FR 37784 

(August 2, 2018), unchanged in Certain Frozen 

Warmwater Shrimp from India: Notice of Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty Changed 

Circumstances Review, 83 FR 49909 (October 3, 

2018). 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) is initiating a 

changed circumstances review of the 

antidumping duty (AD) order on citric 

acid and certain citrate salts (citric acid) 

from Belgium. Further, Commerce 

preliminarily determines that Citribel 

nv (Citribel) is the successor-in-interest 

to S.A. Citrique Belge N.V. (Citrique 

Belge) and should be assigned the same 

AD cash deposit rate for purposes of the 

AD order. Interested parties are invited 

to comment on these preliminary 

results. 

DATES: Applicable June 13, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Deborah Cohen, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4521. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 25, 2018, Commerce 

published the AD order on citric acid 

from Belgium in the Federal Register.1

On April 27, 2022, Commerce received 

a request on behalf of Citribel for an 

expedited changed circumstances 

review, pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act) and 19 CFR 351.216(b), to establish 

Citribel as the successor-in-interest to 

Citrique Belge, a Belgian producer and 

exporter of citric acid, and thus, entitled 

to the AD cash deposit rate of Citrique 

Belge.2 We did not receive comments 

from other interested parties concerning 

this request. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by this 

Order includes all grades and 

granulation sizes of citric acid, sodium 

citrate, and potassium citrate in their 

unblended forms, whether dry or in 

solution, and regardless of packaging 

type. The scope also includes blends of 

citric acid, sodium citrate, and 

potassium citrate; as well as blends with 

other ingredients, such as sugar, where 

the unblended form(s) of citric acid, 

sodium citrate, and potassium citrate 

constitute 40 percent or more, by 

weight, of the blend. 

The scope also includes all forms of 

crude calcium citrate, including 

dicalcium citrate monohydrate, and 

tricalcium citrate tetrahydrate, which 

are intermediate products in the 

production of citric acid, sodium citrate, 

and potassium citrate. 

The scope includes the hydrous and 

anhydrous forms of citric acid, the 

dihydrate and anhydrous forms of 

sodium citrate, otherwise known as 

citric acid sodium salt, and the 

monohydrate and monopotassium forms 

of potassium citrate. Sodium citrate also 

includes both trisodium citrate and 

monosodium citrate which are also 

known as citric acid trisodium salt and 

citric acid monosodium salt, 

respectively. 

The scope does not include calcium 

citrate that satisfies the standards set 

forth in the United States Pharmacopeia 

and has been mixed with a functional 

excipient, such as dextrose or starch, 

where the excipient constitutes at least 

2 percent, by weight, of the product. 

Citric acid and sodium citrate are 

classifiable under 2918.14.0000 and 

2918.15.1000 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), 

respectively. Potassium citrate and 

crude calcium citrate are classifiable 

under 2918.15.5000 and, if included in 

a mixture or blend, 3824.99.9295 of the 

HTSUS. Blends that include citric acid, 

sodium citrate, and potassium citrate 

are classifiable under 3824.99.9295 of 

the HTSUS. Although the HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the merchandise 

is dispositive. 

Initiation of Changed Circumstances 

Review 

Pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the 

Act, Commerce will conduct a changed 

circumstances review upon receipt of 

information concerning, or a request 

from, an interested party for a review of 

an AD order which shows changed 

circumstances sufficient to warrant a 

review of the order. In the past, 

Commerce has used changed 

circumstances reviews to address the 

applicability of cash deposit rates after 

there have been changes in the name or 

structure of a respondent, such as a 

merger or spinoff (‘successor-in-interest’ 

or ‘successorship’ determinations).3 On 

March 14, 2022, Citrique Belge changed 

its name to Citribel and claims that the 

change was in name only and that its 

operations remain materially 

unchanged. Based on a review of the 

request from Citribel, and in accordance 

with section 751(b) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.216(d), we find that the 

information submitted in the CCR 

Request supporting Citribel’s claim that 

it should be treated as the successor-ininterest to Citrique Belge is sufficient to 

warrant such a review to determine 

whether Citribel is entitled to Citrique 

Belge’s AD cash deposit rate. 

Preliminary Results 

Section 351.221(c)(3)(ii) of 

Commerce’s regulations permits 

Commerce to combine the notice of 

initiation of a changed circumstances 

review and the notice of preliminary 

results if Commerce concludes that 

expedited action is warranted. In this 

instance, because the record contains 

information necessary to make a 

preliminary finding, we find that 

expedited action is warranted and have 

combined the notice of initiation and 

the notice of preliminary results. 

Accordingly, pursuant to section 

751(b) of the Act, we have conducted a 

successor-in-interest analysis in 

response to Citribel’s request. In making 

a successor-in-interest determination, 

Commerce examines several factors, 

including, but not limited to, changes in 

the following: (1) management and 

ownership; (2) production facilities; (3) 

supplier relationships; and (4) customer 

base.4 While no single factor or 

combination of factors will necessarily 

provide a dispositive indication of a 

successor-in-interest relationship, 

generally, Commerce will consider the 

new company to be the successor to the 

previous company if the new company’s 

resulting operation is not materially 

dissimilar to that of its predecessor.5

Thus, if the evidence demonstrates that, 

with respect to the production and sales 

of the subject merchandise, the new 

company operates as essentially the 

same business entity as the former 

company, Commerce will accord the 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
35740 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 113 / Monday, June 13, 2022 / Notices 

6See, e.g., Notice of Initiation and Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty Changed 

Circumstances Review: Certain Frozen Warmwater 

Shrimp from India, 77 FR 64953 (October 24, 2012), 

unchanged in Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Changed Circumstances Review: Certain Frozen 

Warmwater Shrimp from India, 77 FR 73619 

(December 11, 2012). 

7See CCR Request at Exhibits 1 and 6. 

8 Id. at Exhibit 1 and 2a. 

9 Id. at Exhibit 3. 

10 Id. at 3. 

11 Id. at Exhibits 11 and 12. 

12 Id. at Exhibits 2a and 2b at Article 3. 

13 Id. at Exhibits 4–6. 

14 Id. at 4–5 and Exhibit 13 at 2. 

15Commerce is exercising its discretion under 19 

CFR 351.310(c) to alter the time limit for requesting 

a hearing. 

16Commerce is exercising its discretion under 19 

CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii) to alter the time limit for the 

filing of case briefs. 

17Commerce is exercising its discretion under 19 

CFR 351.309(d)(1) to alter the time limit for the 

filing of rebuttal briefs. 

18See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2). 

19See 19 CFR 351.303(b). 

20See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD 

Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension 

of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 

new company the same antidumping 

treatment as its predecessor.6

We preliminarily determine that 

Citribel is the successor-in-interest to 

Citrique Belge for purposes of the Order. 

Specifically, Citribel provided 

documentation demonstrating approval 

of Citrique Belge’s name change by 

Citrique Belge’s shareholders (which 

remained unchanged from prior to the 

name change).7 Citrique Belge’s 

shareholders approved of the name 

change in March 2022, the name change 

was effectuated by the new articles of 

association dated March 14, 2022,8 and 

it was announced on March 16, 2022.9

Citribel asserts that the name change 

was made with the purpose of 

‘‘promot{ing} the company’s 

commercial growth.’’ 10 As support, 

Citribel provided the search results from 

the Belgian Federal Public Service 

enquiry that demonstrate that Citribel’s 

enterprise number and address remain 

the same as found on Citrique Belge’s 

most recent financial statements.11

Citribel also provided updated articles 

of association that reflect the name 

change, which reflects that the purpose 

of the company remains unchanged 

from the prior articles.12 The lack of 

changes to the articles supports the 

claim that Citribel’s operations with 

respect to the sales of subject 

merchandise have not materially 

changed as a result of its name change. 

In addition, the record includes a list 

of board of directors, an organizational 

chart and an ownership structure that 

all remain the same before and after the 

name change, supporting Citribel’s 

assertion that there were no ownership, 

director, or management changes related 

to the name change.13 Further, Citribel 

notes that there was no change to its 

production facility as a result of the 

name change, as Citribel operates the 

sole production facility that was 

operated by Citrique Belge.14 Moreover, 

Citribel provided lists of both its 

suppliers and U.S. customers, for the 

year before and the month following the 

name change to support its assertion 

that there have been no material 

changes to Citrique Belge’s suppliers or 

its customer base following the name 

change. This documentation shows that 

the top suppliers and customers are 

substantially similar both pre- and postname change. 

Therefore, based on the 

aforementioned evidence on the record, 

we preliminarily determine that Citribel 

is the successor-in-interest to Citrique 

Belge, as the change in the business’ 

name was not accompanied by 

significant changes to its management 

and ownership, production, facilities, 

supplier relationships, or customer base. 

Thus, we preliminarily determine that 

Citribel operates as essentially the same 

business entity as Citrique Belge, that 

Citribel is the successor-in-interest to 

Citrique Belge, and that Citribel should 

receive the same AD cash deposit rate 

with respect to subject merchandise as 

its predecessor, Citrique Belge. 

Should our final results remain 

unchanged from these preliminary 

results, we will instruct U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection to assign entries 

of subject merchandise exported by 

Citribel the AD cash deposit rate 

applicable to Citrique Belge. Commerce 

will issue its final results of the review 

in accordance with the time limits set 

forth in 19 CFR 351.216(e). 

Public Comment 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), any 

interested party may request a hearing 

within 14 days of publication of this 

notice.15 In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.309(c)(1)(ii), interested parties may 

submit case briefs not later than 14 days 

after the date of publication of this 

notice.16 Rebuttal briefs, limited to 

issues raised in the case briefs, may be 

filed no later than seven days after the 

case briefs, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.309(d).17 Parties who submit case or 

rebuttal briefs are encouraged to submit 

with each argument: (1) A statement of 

the issue; (2) a brief summary of the 

argument; and (3) a table of 

authorities.18 All comments are to be 

filed electronically using ACCESS, 

available to registered users at https://

access.trade.gov, and must also be 

served on interested parties. An 

electronically filed document must be 

received successfully in its entirety by 

ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on 

the day it is due.19 Note that Commerce 

has temporarily modified certain 

requirements for serving documents 

containing business proprietary 

information, until further notice.20

Consistent with 19 CFR 351.216(e), 

we will issue the final results of this 

changed circumstances review no later 

than 270 days after the date on which 

this review was initiated, or within 45 

days if all parties agree to our 

preliminary finding. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is published in 

accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 

777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.216(b), 

351.221(b) and 351.221(c)(3). 

Dated: June 7, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2022–12709 Filed 6–10–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

[RTID 0648–XC099] 

New England Fishery Management 

Council; Public Meeting 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of public meeting. 

SUMMARY: The New England Fishery 

Management Council (Council, NEFMC) 

will hold a three-day hybrid meeting 

with both in-person and remote 

participation to consider actions 

affecting New England fisheries in the 

exclusive economic zone (EEZ). The 

Council continues to follow all public 

safety measures related to COVID–19 

and intends to do so for this meeting. 

DATES: The meeting will be held on 

Tuesday, June 28, 2022 through 

Thursday, June 30, 2022, beginning at 9 

a.m. on all three days. 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at 

the Holiday Inn By the Bay, 88 Spring 

Street, Portland, ME 04101; telephone: 

(207) 775–2311; online at https://

www.innbythebay.com. Join the webinar 

at https://register.gotowebinar.com/ 

register/6422760213108296463. 

Council address: New England 

Fishery Management Council, 50 Water 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES