alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018090EN.01000101.xml

| 9.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 90/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8768 — Singapore Airlines/CAE/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 90/01)

On 2 March 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8768. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8768. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
----

Appeal brought on 22 September 2004 by Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau GmbH against the judgment delivered on 8 July 2004 by the Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition, of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities in Case T-198/01 between Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau GmbH and the Commission of the European Communities, supported by Schott Glas

(Case C-404/04 P)

(2004/C 273/44)

An appeal against the judgment delivered on 8 July 2004 by the Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition, of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities in Case T-198/01 between Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau GmbH and the Commission of the European Communities, supported by Schott Glas, was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 22 September 2004 by Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau GmbH, represented by Christoph Arhold and Norbert Wimmer, Rechtsanwälte, White & Case LLP, 62 rue de la Loi, B-1040 Brussels, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The appellant claims that the Court should:

Pleas and main arguments:

----

(1)  Not yet published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

----
IN RE Artur TCHIBASSA, Petitioner

No. 19-5058

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of prohibition denied.
Mario Ronrico SMITH, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6313

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
# C_2018045EN.01000202.xml

| 7.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8749 — Verdane/Vitruvian/Easypark)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 45/04)

On 25 January 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8749. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8749. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

Case No. 5D2024-0279 

LT Case No. 2018-CF-004648-A 

_____________________________ 

ROLANDO RODNEY, 

Appellant, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

_____________________________ 

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County. 

Lisa D. Herndon, Judge. 

Rolando Rodney, Monticello, pro se. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison 

Leigh Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for 

Appellee. 

July 30, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

EDWARDS, C.J., and HARRIS and SOUD, JJ., concur. 
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2511

In Re: WILBUR P. HOLLAR and RUTH CAROL HOLLAR,

Debtors.

_________________________

WILBUR P. HOLLAR; RUTH CAROL HOLLAR,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; INTERNAL REVENUE

SERVICE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,

District Judge. (CA-95-351-2, BK-93-11389C-7W)

Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 15, 1996

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wilbur P. Hollar, Ruth Carol Hollar, Appellants Pro Se. Thomas

Pearson Holderness, Lawrence P. Blaskopf, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT

OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order affirming

the bankruptcy court's dismissal of this action on the basis of res

judicata. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Hollar v. United States, Nos. CA95-351-2; BK-93-11389C-7W (M.D.N.C. June 14, 1995). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Larry Rashone PRUNTY, Petitioner, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 19-7908.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Charles York WALKER, Jr., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5333

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Rehaif* v. *United States* , 588 U.S. ---, 139 S.Ct. 2191, 204 L.Ed.2d 594 (2019).
----

| (1) | the      report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      registrant. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Dennis Highby                          |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|   | Dennis      Highby                         |
|   | President      and Chief Executive Officer |

|   | /s/ Ralph W. Castner                           |
|--------|------------------------------------------------|
|   | Ralph      W. Castner                          |
|   | Vice      President and Chief FinancialOfficer |

Back to Form 10-Q
TRAVELERS SERIES FUND INC.
on behalf of the
Smith Barney High Income Portfolio 

Supplement dated July 23, 1998
to the Prospectus dated February 27, 1998

	The following information supplements the information set 
forth in the Prospectus under "Special Investment Techniques and 
Risk Considerations."

Real Estate Investment Trusts

The Smith Barney High Income Portfolio may invest in real 
estate investment trusts ("REITs").  REITs are entities which 
either own properties or make construction or mortgage loans.  
Equity trusts own real estate directly and the value of, and 
income earned by, the trust depends upon the income of the 
underlying properties and the rental income they earn.  
Equity trusts may also include operating or finance 
companies.  Equity trusts can also realize capital gains by 
selling properties that have appreciated in value.  A 
mortgage trust can make construction, development or long-
term mortgage loans, and are sensitive to the credit quality 
of the borrower.  Mortgage trusts derive their income from 
interest payments.  Hybrid trusts combine the characteristics 
of both equity and mortgage trusts, generally by holding both 
ownership interests and mortgage interests in real estate.  
The value of securities issued by REITs are affected by tax 
and regulatory requirements and by perceptions of management 
skill.  They are also subject to heavy cash flow dependency, 
defaults by borrowers or tenants, self-liquidation, the 
possibility of failing to qualify for tax-free status under 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and failing to 
maintain exemption from the Investment Company Act of 1940, 
as amended.





FD 01524
Jane DOE, Petitioner v. DARDANELLE SCHOOL DISTRICT

No. 19M57

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 21, 2019

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari with supplemental appendix under seal granted.
Teresa BERRY, Petitioner, v. DELAWARE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE.

No. 19-1014.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Order entered September 30 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 01547
- CR
TIMOTHY SCOTT HARRIM AN, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5

Dallas County, Texas T rial Court Cause No. F94
- 01553
- ML



### O RDER
The Court REINSTATES the appeal. On July 30, 2014, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s
brief ha d not been filed. On September 29, 2014, we received appellant’s brief, together wit h an extension motion. Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the July 30, 2014 order requiring findings.
We GRANT the September 29, 2014 extension motion and ORDER appellant’s brief
filed as of the date of this order. No hearing w as conducted on the motion for post

- conviction DNA testing at issue in this appeal. However, appellant’s brief cites to the reporter’s record of the underlying trial. Accordingly, we DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to transfer the clerk’s and reporter’s r ecordsfrom the appeal of cause no. 05

- 94

- 00905

- CR, styled Timothy Harriman v. The State of Texas ,

into the above appeal. We further DIRECT the Clerk to file a copy of this order in cause no. 05

- 94

- 00905

- CR.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Jack R. Altherr, Jr., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Avondale Incorporated;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     Date: April 7, 2006 /s/ JACK R. ALTHERR, JR.     Jack R. Altherr, Jr.    Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer
SMITH BARNEY MANAGED GROWTH FUND
(the "Fund")

Supplement dated April 16, 1998 to
Prospectus dated April 30, 1997


	The following information supersedes the 
information set forth in the Fund's Prospectus 
entitled "Management of the Fund:" 
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT

	John Stoeser serves as Portfolio Manager of 
the Fund and is responsible for management of the 
assets of the Fund.  Mr. Stoeser was Vice 
President and Research Analyst of the Fund since 
July 1997. Prior to joining Smith Barney, Mr. 
Stoeser was Assistant Vice President, Portfolio 
Manager and Research Analyst with Safeco Asset 
Management since 1992.  Mr. Stoeser had portfolio 
management responsibility for a number of equity 
and fixed income portfolios including 
responsibility as portfolio manager of Safeco 
Defined Benefit Plan and Safeco Trust Company and 
co-portfolio manager of Safeco High Yield Fund.



FD 01444
Luis ORDONEZ-VEGA, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5588

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
CENTAUR, L.L.C., Petitioner, v. RIVER VENTURES, L.L.C.

No. 19-1146.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           9,163
<SECURITIES>                                     1,222
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,863
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,341
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         175,989
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,305
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 207,776
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,529
<BONDS>                                        117,950
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         29
<COMMON>                                            41
<OTHER-SE>                                      84,753
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   207,776
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,111
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,628
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,758
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,210
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,558
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,434
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,434
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15
        

</TABLE>
William T. WINDSOR, Petitioner v. DELAWARE

No. 18-9660

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
<Page>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.1B


[LETTERHEAD OF INFOCROSSING]


                                                                January 11, 2002


Mr. Arthur Kurek
Alicomp
2 Christie Heights Street
Leonia, NJ 07605

        Re:     Master Service Agreement between Infocrossing, Inc. and
                Alicomp, a division of Alicare, Inc., on the one hand and ADT
                Security Services, on the other hand, dated as of May 14, 2001
                (the "MSA")
                --------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Art:

        As we had discussed, the regular monthly commission payable to Alicomp
by Infocrossing with respect to the MSA as supplemented by all Change Request
Forms through Change Request Form #11 is $* effective January 1, 2002. Such
amount was determined by increasing the monthly commission of $* payable before
January 1, 2002 by $*. In addition, Alicomp shall receive a one-time payment of
$* and four payments of $* in connection with the resources upgrade and the
EWalker Billing Project. The $* payment will be due from Infocrossing's
collection of a one-time invoice to ADT for $*. The $* payments will be due
from monthly invoices to ADT for $* beginning in December 2001. A commission
will be payable to Alicomp only after Infocrossing has received payment of the
related invoice from ADT.

        Please indicate your agreement to the foregoing by signing the duplicate
original of this letter agreement and returning it to me.


                                                Sincerely,

                                                /s/ NICHOLAS J. LETIZIA
                                                --------------------------
                                                Nicholas J. Letizia
                                                Sr. Vice President


Agreed as of January 10, 2002
Alicomp, a division of Alicare, Inc.


By: /s/ Arthur Kurek
   ---------------------------------
   Arthur Kurek
   President


* Confidential portion has been omitted and filed separately with the
Commission.
Exhibit 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT
OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

The undersigned hereby certify that the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 filed by
TNS, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.

Dated:
August 9, 2010

/s/ HENRY H. GRAHAM, JR. Henry H. Graham, Jr. Chief Executive Officer


Dated:
August 9, 2010

/s/ DENNIS L. RANDOLPH, JR. Dennis L. Randolph, Jr. Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


---



QuickLinks
H. Con. Res. 124 Agreed to December 16, 2014

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill, H.R. 5771, the Clerk 

of the House shall amend subsection (a) of section 1 of Division 

B (relating to Achieving a Better Life Experience Act of 2014) 

to read as follows: 

‘‘(a) SHORT TITLE.—This division may be cited as the ‘Stephen 

Beck, Jr., Achieving a Better Life Experience Act of 2014’ or the 

‘Stephen Beck, Jr., ABLE Act of 2014’.’’. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate.
```

```

----

Updated July 4, 2014
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In connection with the accompanying
Annual Report of Modern City Entertainment, Inc.. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ending September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William Erfurth
President and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350,as adopted pursuant toSection 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of my knowledge, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements ofSection
13(a)or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the
Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


Date:
      November
      10, 2008
                By:
                /s/ William
      ErfurthWilliam
      ErfurthPresident
      and Director