alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018412EN.01003301.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 14.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 412/33 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9137 — Rehau/MB Barter & Trading)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 412/09)

1.

On 5 November 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018412EN.01003301-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | REHAU Verwaltungszentrale AG (‘Rehau’, Switzerland), belonging to the Rehau group, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | MB Barter & Trading Holding AG (‘MBT’, Switzerland). |

Rehau acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control over the whole of MBT. The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Rehau: system and service provider for polymer-based solutions for construction, automotive and industrial applications,

—   for MBT: active in the production and supply of standard polymers, PET and other petrochemical products such as rubber.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018412EN.01003301-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9137 — Rehau/MB Barter & Trading

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018412EN.01003301-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018412EN.01003301-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
February 27, 1997
Smith Barney Investment Funds Inc.
388 Greenwich Street
New York, New York 10013

                   Re:  Rule 24f-2 Notice
                              
Gentlemen:

    In connection with the filing by Smith Barney Investment
Funds Inc., a Maryland corporation (the "Fund"), of a Notice
(the "Notice"), pursuant to Rule 24f-2 under the Investment
Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Act"), for the Fund's
fiscal year ended December 31, 1996, the undersigned hereby
provides the legal opinion required by that Rule.

     In accordance with Rule 24f-2, the Fund has registered
an indefinite number of shares of common stock, $0.001 par
value, under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"1933 Act"). The purpose of the Notice is to make definite
the registration of 81,171,062 shares of the Fund (the
"Shares") sold in reliance upon the Rule during the fiscal
year ended December 31, 1996.

     The undersigned is Deputy General Counsel of Smith
Barney Mutual Funds Management Inc., the Fund's
administrator, and in such capacity, from time to time and
for certain purposes, acts as counsel to the Fund. He has
examined copies of the Fund's Articles of Incorporation, its
By-Laws, resolutions adopted by its Board of Directors, and
such other records and documents as have been deemed
necessary for purposes of this opinion.  Furthermore, he has
examined a Certificate of the Controller of the Fund to the
effect that the Fund received the cash consideration for
each of the Shares in accordance with the aforementioned
organizational documents and resolutions.

     On the basis of the foregoing, and assuming all of the
Shares were sold in accordance with the terms of the Fund's
Prospectus in effect at the time of sale, he is of the
opinion that the Shares have been duly authorized and
validly issued and are fully paid and non-assessable.  This
opinion is for the limited purposes expressed above and
should not be deemed to be an expression of opinion as to
compliance with the 1933 Act, the 1940 Act or applicable
State "blue sky" laws in connection with the sales of the
Shares.


                                        Very truly yours,


                                        Robert Vegliante
                                        Deputy General
                                        Counsel
                                        Smith Barney Mutual
Funds
Management Inc.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7741

ELSON MCKANIC,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN LEWIS,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock 

Hill. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (0:19-cv-02680-HMH)

Submitted: May 20, 2020 Decided: August 7, 2020

Before WYNN, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elson McKanic, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Elson McKanic seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing McKanic’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 

(2018) petition as an unauthorized, successive § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable 

unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2018). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial 

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2018). When, as 

here, the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate 

both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 

140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

Because we did not authorize McKanic’s successive petition, we conclude that the 

district court’s procedural ruling was neither wrong nor debatable. So McKanic has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/12/14          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      390,841
COMMITMENTS
 108,653  123,319  114,432  143,258  121,107  366,343  358,858   24,498   31,983

CHANGES FROM 08/05/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -19,050)
 -13,785  -33,657     -854   -2,322   15,110  -16,961  -19,401   -2,089      351

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    27.8     31.6     29.3     36.7     31.0     93.7     91.8      6.3      8.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      190)
      56       72       83       44       45      151      160
```

----

Updated August 15, 2014
Travis DENNIS, Petitioner v. Darrel VANNOY, Warden.

No. 19-5904

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 43 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 43

    Removing the deadline for the ratification of the equal rights 
                               amendment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2013

   Mr. Andrews (for himself, Mr. Grijalva, Ms. Speier, Ms. Chu, Mr. 
 Lowenthal, Ms. Norton, Ms. Wasserman Schultz, Ms. Wilson of Florida, 
Mr. Gutierrez, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Richmond, Ms. Pingree of Maine, Mr. 
 Michaud, Mr. Ruppersberger, Mr. Sarbanes, Ms. Edwards, Mr. Hoyer, Mr. 
  Cummings, Mr. Van Hollen, Ms. Tsongas, Mr. Levin, Mr. Dingell, Mr. 
   Conyers, Ms. McCollum, Mr. Ellison, Mr. Clay, Ms. Michelle Lujan 
Grisham of New Mexico, Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York, Ms. Kaptur, 
   Mr. Moran, Mr. Smith of Washington, and Ms. Moore) introduced the 
following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Removing the deadline for the ratification of the equal rights 
                               amendment.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding any time 
limit contained in House Joint Resolution 208, 92d Congress, as agreed 
to in the Senate on March 22, 1972, the article of amendment proposed 
to the States in that joint resolution shall be valid to all intents 
and purposes as part of the Constitution whenever ratified by the 
legislatures of three-fourths of the several States.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Archives and Records Administration

          - [NARA-22-0012; NARA-2022-053]

# AGENCY:

National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).

# ACTION:

Notice; administrative correction.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Kimberly Richardson, Regulatory and External Policy Program Manager, by email at                         *regulation_comments@nara.gov.*                         For information about records schedules, contact Records Management Operations by email at                         *request.schedule@nara.gov*                         or by phone at 301-837-1799.                    

# SUMMARY:

                        We published records schedules (NARA-22-0012; NARA 2022-053) in the                         **Federal Register**                         on June 9, 2022, and requested comments by the due date, June 8, 2022, in error. We are correcting the due date for comments.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Correction

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of June 9, 2022, in FR Doc. Vol 87, No.111, on page 35249, in the first column, correct the                     **DATES**                     caption to read:                

# DATES:

 

We must receive responses on the schedules listed in this notice by July 25, 2022.

Laurence Brewer,

Chief Records Officer for the U.S. Government.

[FR Doc. 2022-12808 Filed 6-13-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7515-01-P
Jean-Paul GAMARRA, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6393

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

*571Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
# C_2018223EN.01000501.xml

| 27.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8945 — Permira/Cisco (Target Businesses))

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 223/03)

On 19 June 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8945. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8945. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2018412EN.01000202.xml

| 14.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 412/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 412/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8733 — Lone Star/Stark)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 412/04)

On 14 March 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8733. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8733. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
CERTIFICATE
                              
      The  undersigned, Controller of SMITH BARNEY
INSTITUTIONAL CASH MANAGEMENT FUND, INC. (the "Fund"),
hereby certifies that the Fund has  received  full payment,
in  accordance  with  the provisions of its Prospectus, for
2,286,363,214 shares of common stock,  par  value $.00001
per share, the sales  of  which are reported in the Fund's
Rule 24f-2 Notice covering the fiscal year ended  May 31,
1996 and that the facts otherwise stated in such Notice are
true.


                                   Irving David
                                   Controller

Dated:                   November 25, 1996
Exhibit
10.11




REVOLVING
NOTE




$25,000,000
            November 6,
      2009





FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the
undersigned, PHYSICIANS FORMULA, INC., a New York corporation (the “Company”),
hereby promises to pay to the order of WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
(“Wells Fargo”), acting through its WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CREDIT operating
division, on the Termination Date described in the Credit and Security Agreement
dated November 6, 2009 (as amended, restated or otherwise modified from
time to time, the “Agreement”) and entered into between Wells Fargo and Company,
at Wells Fargo’s office at 245 South Los Robles Avenue, Suite 700,
Pasadena, California 91101, or at any other place designated at any time by the
holder, in lawful money of the United States of America and in immediately
available funds, the principal sum of Twenty-Five Million Dollars ($25,000,000)
or the aggregate unpaid principal amount of all Advances under the Line of
Credit made by Wells Fargo to Company under the terms of the Agreement, together
with interest on the outstanding principal amount computed on the basis of
actual days elapsed in a 360-day year, from the date of this Revolving Note
until this Revolving Note is fully paid at the rate from time to time in effect
under the terms of the Agreement.  Principal and interest accruing on
the unpaid principal balance amount of this Revolving Note shall be due and
payable as provided in the Agreement.  This Revolving Note may be
prepaid only in accordance with the Agreement.




This
Revolving Note is the Revolving Note referred to in the Agreement, and is
subject to the terms of the Agreement, which provides, among other things, for
the acceleration of this Revolving Note.  This Revolving Note is
secured, among other things, by the Agreement and the Security Documents as
defined in the Agreement, and by any other security agreements, mortgages, deeds
of trust, assignments or other instruments or agreements that may subsequently
be given for good and valuable consideration as security for this Revolving
Note.




Company
shall pay all costs of collection, including without limitation reasonable
attorneys’ fees and legal expenses, if this Revolving Note is not paid when due,
in accordance with the Agreement whether or not legal proceedings are
commenced.




Presentment
or other demand for payment, notice of dishonor and protest are expressly
waived.




PHYSICIANS
      FORMULA, INC.By:
            /s/ Ingrid JackelName:
            Ingrid JackelTitle:
            Chief Executive
  Officer
# C_2018420EN.01000501.xml

| 20.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 420/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 420/5

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9124 — Dana/Oerlikon Drive Systems)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 420/03)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Dana Incorporated (‘Dana’, U.S.), |
| --- | --- |

—

Dana Incorporated (‘Dana’, U.S.),

| — | GrazianoFairfield AG, Pfaffikon (‘GrazianoFairfield AG’, Switzerland), controlled by OC Oerlikon Corporation AG, Pfaffikon (‘Oerlikon’, Switzerland), |
| --- | --- |

—

GrazianoFairfield AG, Pfaffikon (‘GrazianoFairfield AG’, Switzerland), controlled by OC Oerlikon Corporation AG, Pfaffikon (‘Oerlikon’, Switzerland),

Dana acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of GrazianoFairfield AG.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | Dana is a global supplier of driveline, sealing and thermal-management products to manufacturers of light, commercial and off-highway vehicles as well as gearboxes, hydraulic products and driveshafts for industrial stationary equipment, |
| --- | --- |

—

Dana is a global supplier of driveline, sealing and thermal-management products to manufacturers of light, commercial and off-highway vehicles as well as gearboxes, hydraulic products and driveshafts for industrial stationary equipment,

| — | GrazianoFairfield AG is a provider of gear, drive and shifting solutions for mobile vehicles and industrial equipment. |
| --- | --- |

—

GrazianoFairfield AG is a provider of gear, drive and shifting solutions for mobile vehicles and industrial equipment.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9124 — Dana/Oerlikon Drive Systems

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| --- |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
MUNICIPAL HIGH INCOME FUND INC. 
(the "Fund")

Supplement dated March 26, 1997
to the Prospectus dated January 15, 1997



The following information supplements, and to the extent inconsistent 
therewith, supersedes, the information in the Prospectus under the 
section "Investment Objective and Policies": 

	The Fund may invest up to 100% of its assets in Municipal 
Obligations rated as low as Ba by Moody's or BB by S&P or BB by 
Fitch or in unrated Municipal Obligations deemed to be of 
comparable quality. The Fund will not invest in Municipal 
Obligations that are rated lower than Ba, MIG 1/VMIG 1 or P-2 by 
Moody's or BB, SP-1 or A-1 by S&P. 


FD 01286  3/97
Sub-Item 77C:

             MUNICIPAL PARTNERS FUND INC. (MNP)

               Special Meeting of Stockholders
                           held on
                      December 11, 2002


                      Report of Voting

Total Outstanding Shares:          5,756,361 Common         800
Preferred

Total Shares Voted:           5,182,870 Common         800
Preferred

% of Outstanding Shares Voted:     90%                 100%


                                        Number         Percent of
                                        Of Shares Voted     Voted
Shares

Proposal 1  Approval of New Investment Advisory
          and Administration Agreement:

Common
For:                                    5,009,384      96.65%
Against:                                89,626              1.73%
Abstained:                                                 83,860
1.62%

Preferred
For:                                    800            100%
Against:                                0              0%
Abstained:                                   0              0%




Dated:                                          December 11, 2002