alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 88 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 88

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR SOAP BOX DERBY RACES.

    (a) In General.--The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Association 
(in this resolution referred to as the ``sponsor'') shall be permitted 
to sponsor a public

              

 event, soap box derby races (in this resolution referred to as the 
``event''), on the Capitol Grounds.
    (b) Date of Event.--The event shall be held on June 14, 2014, or on 
such other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate jointly designate.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board, the event shall be--
            (1) free of admission charge and open to the public; and
            (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The sponsor shall assume full 
responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all 
activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the 
sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, 
sound amplification devices, and other related structures and equipment 
as may be required for the event.

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

    The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board are 
authorized to make such additional arrangements as may be required to 
carry out the event.

SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 1, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 88

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater Washington 
                            Soap Box Derby.
```
# C_2018284EN.01000102.xml

| 13.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8891 — Puig/BSH/Noustique)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 284/02)

On 18 July 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8891. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8891. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1099 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1099

            To repeal the Prevention and Public Health Fund.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 12, 2013

  Mr. Pitts introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To repeal the Prevention and Public Health Fund.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEALING PREVENTION AND PUBLIC HEALTH FUND.

    (a) In General.--Section 4002 of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 300u-11) is repealed.
    (b) Rescission of Unobligated Funds.--Of the funds made available 
by such section 4002, the unobligated balance is rescinded.
    (c) Notice of Rescission of Unobligated Funds.--Not later than 10 
days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 
Health and Human Services shall post on the public website of the 
Department of Health and Human Services a notice of--
            (1) the rescission, pursuant to subsection (b), of the 
        unobligated balance of funds made available by such section 
        4002; and
            (2) the amount of such funds so rescinded.
                                 <all>
```
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PATRICIA LEDEZMA-RIVAS,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-73282

Agency No. A075-619-131

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 23, 2010** 

Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Patricia Ledezma-Rivas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying her application for cancellation of removal. 

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review questions of law de novo,

FILED

SEP 07 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-73282

Tapia v. Gonzales, 430 F.3d 997, 999 (9th Cir. 2005), and we deny the petition for

review.

The agency properly determined that Ledezma-Rivas was ineligible for

cancellation of removal because she failed to meet the seven-year continuous

physical presence requirement. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a)(2) (requiring seven years

of continuous presence after having been “admitted in any status”); see also 8

U.S.C. § 1101(a)(13)(A) (defining “admitted” as “the lawful entry of an alien into

the United States after inspection and authorization by an immigration officer.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

1 105 F.3d 972 (5th Cir. 1997).

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-30097

Summary Calendar

 

EVARISTUS MACKEY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WINN CORRECTIONAL CENTER ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 93-CV-965

- - - - - - - - - -

July 22, 1997

Before WISDOM, JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Prisoner-appellant, Evaristus Mackey, Louisiana inmate

#317335, filed a notice of appeal in this § 1983 action before

the effective date of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA). 

In Strickland v. Rankin County Correctional facility,

1 this court

held that “prisoners whose appeals were pending on the effective

date of the PLRA must refile to this court in conformity with the
No. 96-30097

- 2 -

2 Id. at 974.

3 Id. at 976.

4 See Fifth Circuit Rule 42.3.

amended statute before we consider their appeals on the merits”.2

The financial affidavits filed by Mackey in the district court do

not comply with the requirements for seeking in forma pauperis

(IFP) status under the PLRA. Mackey has filed no documents in

this court in support of his economic eligibility to proceed IFP. 

Mackey has a choice: he may refile this appeal in accordance with

the PLRA, or he may drop the appeal. We will not consider

Mackey’s appeal “filed” for the purposes of § 1915(b), as

amended, unless he refiles.3 

Mackey has 30 days from the date of this order to comply

with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This appeal is held in

abeyance until Mackey complies herewith, or until the expiration

of 30 days, whichever comes first. If Mackey does not comply

within the 30 days, the clerk of this court is to dismiss the

appeal for lack of prosecution.4
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-11313 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JESUS RAMIREZ-CADENA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:05-CR-44-2

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appointed counsel for Jesus Ramirez-Cadena (Ramirez) has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ramirez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 113 (Monday, June 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 35851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12630]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Special Projects 
Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Special 
Projects Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is 
soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving 
customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. This meeting will 
still be held via teleconference.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, July 13, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Antoinette Ross at 1-888-912-1227 or 
202-317-4110.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Special Projects 
Committee will be held Wednesday, July 13, 2022, at 11:00 a.m. Eastern 
Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written 
statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure of 
meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with 
Antoinette Ross. For more information please contact Antoinette Ross at 
1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-4110, or write TAP Office, 1111 Constitution 
Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or contact us at the website: 
http://www.improveirs.org. The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: June 7, 2022.
Kevin Brown,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2022-12630 Filed 6-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000979480
<NAME> SMITH BARNEY SECTOR SERIES
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER>007
   <NAME>SMITH BARNEY GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY FUND

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              2 Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 OCT-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                      OCT-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>              6,361,730
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>             5,119,436
<RECEIVABLES>                        146,512
<ASSETS-OTHER>                             0
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                     212
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     5,266,160
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>               2,284
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                    0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                  0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                    2,284
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                            0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>           6,409,791
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                171,423
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                      0
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                  0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                (6,413)
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>              (67,872)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                   0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>          (1,242,360)
<NET-ASSETS>                       5,093,146
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                     10,016
<INTEREST-INCOME>                      1,220
<OTHER-INCOME>                             0
<EXPENSES-NET>                        17,649
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>               (6,413)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>             (67,872)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>         (1,242,360)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>             (1,316,645)
<EQUALIZATION>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                  0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                   0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                      0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>            8,937,999
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>       (2,528,208)
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                        0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>             5,093,146
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                    0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                  0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                    0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                 0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                  8,085
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                       92,510
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>               1,417,970
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                  11.40
<PER-SHARE-NII>                        (0.02)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                 0.00
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                    0.00
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>               0.00
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                    0.00
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                     8.77
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                         2.25
[AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING]                     0
[AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE]                       0



</TABLE>
Paul Melvin WATSON, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9469

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Sekou KOUYATE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION.

No. 19-5562

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 10.1

 

May 3, 2012

 

Private and Confidential

 

Edmund J. Schwartz

22 Avon Road

Warren, New Jersey 07059

 

Re: First Amendment to March Offer Letter Dated March 6, 2012 (“Letter Agreement”)

 

Dear Ed:

 

In furtherance of our most recent discussions we have agreed to amend your consulting arrangement with Summer Infant, Inc. (“Summer”) set forth in the Letter Agreement as follows:

 

1.                                      The parties have agreed that the consulting arrangement will continue to and including March 15, 2013. Summer retains the right to extend the term of this arrangement, in monthly increments, upon not less than thirty (30) days written notice to you.

 

2.                                      Notwithstanding the extension of the consulting arrangement to and including March 15, 2013, this relationship shall remain a consulting at will arrangement and either party shall have the right, for any reason whatsoever, to terminate the consulting arrangement on not less than ninety (90) days prior written notice to the other party.

 

3.                                      Except as amended hereby the Letter Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed.

 

 

	
 
    	
 
    	
Sincerely,
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Summer Infant, Inc.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
/s/ Jason Macari
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Jason Macari
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
President and CEO
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Acknowledged and Agreed to:
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Edmund J.   Schwartz
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Edmund J. Schwartz
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Date: 
    	
5/3/12
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/20/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      112,521
COMMITMENTS
  18,395   13,860    6,301   81,895   89,203  106,591  109,364    5,930    3,157

CHANGES FROM 05/13/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,052)
     702      475       74    1,896    1,484    2,672    2,033     -620       19

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    16.3     12.3      5.6     72.8     79.3     94.7     97.2      5.3      2.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       96)
      12        7        2       55       39       67       48
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/20/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      295,942
COMMITMENTS
  94,515   36,349    2,313  181,543  250,465  278,371  289,127   17,571    6,815

CHANGES FROM 05/13/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      6,534)
   3,955   -2,834      317    5,308   12,237    9,580    9,720   -3,046   -3,186

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    31.9     12.3      0.8     61.3     84.6     94.1     97.7      5.9      2.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      206)
      62       29       13       85       65      151      103
```

----

Updated May 23, 2014
Jack ROSE, et ux., Petitioners v. David REAVES, Chapter 7 Trustee.

No. 19-24

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-82,736-01

EX P ARTE F REDERICK D. ERVIN, Applicant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 9402JD-HC-1 IN THE 1-A DISTRICT COURT

F ROM JASP ER COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of ag g ravated sexual assault and se ntence d to life imprisonment. He did not appea l his conviction. Applicant contends that trial counsel rende red ineffe ctive assistance

. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief

. S t r i ckl a n d v. W

ashington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson , 993 S.W .2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W .2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial cour

t is the a ppropriate forum for finding s of fac t. The trial court shall order trial counsel2

to respond to Applicant’s ineffe ctive assistance of counsel claims. The t ri al court may use any means set out in T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d)

. I f t he trial court elects t o hold a hearing , it shall deter mine whether Applicant is i n d ige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, t h e t rial court shall appoint an attorney to repre sent him at the hea ring . T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. T he trial court shall make finding s of fac t and conclusions of law as to whether cou n s el ’s conduct wa s deficie nt and Appli cant was prejudice d. The trial court shall also make finding s and conclusions as to whether Applicant’s claim is barr ed by the doctrine of lache s. In doing so, the trial court shall g ive Applicant an opportunity t o re s p o n d and explain his delay

. Ex parte Smith , 444 S.W .3d 661, 670 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). The trial court shall als o m ak e any other finding s and conclusions that it deems rele vant and appropr iate to the dispositi on of Applicant’s claims for habea s corpus r elief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 day s of this order

. A supplemental t ra n s cr i p t containing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be for war ded to this Court withi n 120 day s of t he date of t his order

. Any extensions of ti me shall be obtained f

rom this Court. Filed: Apr il 15, 2015 Do not publish
Nilesh Bharatkumar KUMAR, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-491

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Roda HIRAMANEK, petitioner, v. L. Michael CLARK, et al.

No. 18M77.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
R. David WEISSKOPF, Petitioner v. JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL, et al.

No. 19-176

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.