alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CONSENT TO CHANGE IN EMPLOYMENT ARRANGEMENTS

Dear Steve:

         This letter agreement is made as of the 15th day of July, 2003, with
Steven Crawford ("Employee").

         Reference is made to your offer letter of May 13, 2003. This letter
confirms that your agreement that you will be granted options for a total of
51,250 shares of common stock of Pinnacle Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"). Half
of these will be $10 Shares and half will be $20 Shares (as described in your
offer letter).

         This letter also contains your agreement that the vesting schedule set
forth in your option agreement will provide that your options vest 30% on
December 31, 2003, 30% on December 31, 2004 and 40% on December 31, 2005.

         You acknowledge that you have not entered into any separate agreement
with any Pinnacle entity which provides for a different number of options or for
vesting terms in respect of your options, whether conditioned upon the
occurrence of any event relating to the Company or the Employee or otherwise.

                                       Sincerely


                                       /s/ David Grain
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       David Grain
                                       President
                                       Pinnacle Holdings, Inc.

                                       ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:



                                       /s/ Steven Crawford
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Steven Crawford
Exhibit B

Case 2:24-cv-00021-JRG Document 54-3 Filed 07/18/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 3114
Delaware.gov Governor | General Assembly | Courts | Elected Officials | State Agencies

Department of State: Division of Corporations

Allowable Characters

HOME Entity Details

THIS IS NOT A STATEMENT OF GOOD STANDING

File Number: 3030766 Incorporation Date /

Formation Date:

6/9/2020

(mm/dd/yyyy)

Entity Name: NEW PP HOLDINGS LLC

Entity Kind:

Limited

Liability

Company

Entity Type: General

Residency: Domestic State: DELAWARE

REGISTERED AGENT INFORMATION

Name: THE CORPORATION TRUST COMPANY

Address: CORPORATION TRUST CENTER 1209 ORANGE ST

City: WILMINGTON County: New Castle

State: DE Postal Code: 19801

Phone: 302-658-7581

Additional Information is available for a fee. You can retrieve Status for a fee of $10.00 or

more detailed information including current franchise tax assessment, current filing history

and more for a fee of $20.00.

Would you like Status Status,Tax & History Information

Submit

View Search Results New Entity Search

For help on a particular field click on the Field Tag to take you to the help area.

site map | privacy | about this site | contact us | translate | delaware.gov

6/18/24, 11:05 PM Division of Corporations - Filing

https://icis.corp.delaware.gov/Ecorp/EntitySearch/NameSearch.aspx 1/1

Case 2:24-cv-00021-JRG Document 54-3 Filed 07/18/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 3115
[Cite as State v. Bronczyk , 2013-Ohio-3129.] 

# Court of Appeals of Ohio

EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

No. 98664



## STATE OF OHIO

PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE

vs.



## JOSEPH BRONCZYK

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT



### JUDGMENT:

APPLICATION DENIED

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court

Case No. CR-540345 Application for Reopening

Motion No. 465969

RELEASE DATE: 

### July 17, 2013APPELLANT

Joseph Bronczyk, Pro Se

No. 594-815

2500 South Avon Belden Road Grafton, Ohio 44044

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE

Timothy J. McGinty Cuyahoga County Prosecutor By: Holly Welsh Assistant County Prosecutor

1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113KATHLEEN ANN KEOUGH, J.:

{¶1} On June 20, 2013, Joseph Bronczyk filed an application for reopening

pursuant to App.R. 26(B). Bronczyk is attempting to reopen the appeal that was

dismissed by this court on May 8, 2013.

App.R. 26(B)(1) provides that

a defendant in a criminal case may apply for reopening of the appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence , based on a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. An application for reopening shall be filed in the court of appeals where the appeal was decided within ninety days from journalization of the appellate judgment unless the applicant shows good cause for filing at a later time.

(Emphasis added.)

{¶2} In the case sub judice, no appellate judgment was announced and journalized

by this court that reviewed Bronczyk’s conviction and sentence as rendered in State v.

Bronczyk , Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-540345. Thus, this court is prevented from

considering Bronczyk’s application for reopening as made pursuant to App.R. 26(B).

State v. Loomer , 76 Ohio St.3d 398, 1996-Ohio-59, 667 N.E.2d 1209; See also State v.

Halliwell , 8th Dist. No. 70369, 1999 Ohio App. LEXIS 285 (Jan. 28, 1999).

Accordingly, the application for reopening is denied.

KATHLEEN ANN KEOUGH, JUDGE

FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., P.J., and MARY EILEEN KILBANE, J., CONCUR
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JUAN PABLO PACHECO-GARCIA,

Petitioner,

v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 15-71674 Agency No. A205-412-379
MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Im m igration Appeals Subm itted August 16, 2016 * * Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges. Juan Pablo Pacheco-Garcia, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Im m igration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dism issing his appeal from an im m igration judge’s (“IJ”) rem oval order denying his request for a continuance. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of 

# FILED
AUG 24 2016 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

* * The panel unanim ously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argum e nt. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).discretion the denial of a m otion for a continuance, and review de novo questions

of law. Ahmed v. Holder , 569 F.3d 1009, 1012 (9th Cir. 2009). We deny in part and grant in part the petition for review. The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Pacheco-Garcia’s request for a fourth continuance where he did not dem onstrate good cause. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29; Ahmed , 569 F.3d at 1012 (factors considered in determ ining whether the denial of a continuance constitutes an abuse of discretion include the nature of the evidence excluded as a result of the denial). In addition, the agency’s denial of a continuance to seek new counsel did not violate Pacheco-Garcia’s right to counsel, where the IJ had deem ed his application for relief abandoned. See Ram v. Mukasey , 529 F.3d 1238, 1242 (9th Cir. 2008) (an IJ m a y “determ ine, in the absence of a showing of good cause for an additional continuance, that the right to counsel has been forfeited”); Lata v. INS , 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000). We reject Pacheco-Garcia’s contentions that the BIA ignored certain argum ents, failed to provide a reasoned explanation for its actions, and incorrectly applied the pertinent legal standard. See Najmabadi v. Holder , 597 F.3d 983, 990 (9th Cir. 2010) (“[The BIA] does not have to write an exegesis on every contention. What is required is m erely that it consider the issues raised, and announce its decision in term s sufficient to enable a reviewing court to perceive

15-71674 2that it has heard and thought and not m erely reacted.” (citation and quotation m arks

om itted)); Lata , 204 F.3d at 1246 (requiring error and substantial prejudice to prevail on a due process claim ). Because the BIA did not address Pacheco-Garcia’s contentions regarding voluntary departure, we rem a nd for the BIA to consider these contentions in the first instance. See Montes-Lopez v. Gonzales , 486 F.3d 1163, 1165 (9th Cir. 2007). Each party shall bear its own costs for this petition for review. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; GRANTED in part; REMANDED.

15-71674 3
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018065EN.01002601.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 21.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/26 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.8816 — Goldman Sachs/Centerbridge/Robyg)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 65/08)

1.

On 14 February 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018065EN.01002601-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (‘Goldman Sachs’, USA), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Centerbridge Partners, LP (‘Centerbridge’, USA), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Robyg SA (‘Robyg’, Poland). |

Goldman Sachs and Centerbridge acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Robyg.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Goldman Sachs: global investment banking, securities and investment management,

—   for Centerbridge: investment management focused on private equity and distressed investment opportunities,

—   for Robyg: indirectly solely controlled by Goldman Sachs, construction and sale of flats and commercial real estate in Poland.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018065EN.01002601-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.8816 — Goldman Sachs/Centerbridge/Robyg

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018065EN.01002601-E0001)  
[OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018065EN.01002601-E0002)  
[OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 06/18/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      101,316
COMMITMENTS
  21,524    2,990    2,989   70,348   89,922   94,861   95,901    6,455    5,415

CHANGES FROM 06/11/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     12,045)
  -2,548   -1,075      904   13,131   10,690   11,487   10,519      558    1,526

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    21.2      3.0      3.0     69.4     88.8     93.6     94.7      6.4      5.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       77)
      13        5        4       40       36       53       45
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 06/18/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      262,992
COMMITMENTS
  69,505   42,580    2,509  165,688  202,882  237,702  247,971   25,290   15,021

CHANGES FROM 06/11/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     20,876)
   1,231    3,304   -5,280   21,096   19,738   17,047   17,762    3,829    3,114

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    26.4     16.2      1.0     63.0     77.1     90.4     94.3      9.6      5.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      157)
      40       23       12       71       58      118       86
```

----

Updated June 21, 2013
# Official Journal C 194A/21 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 194A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6421 May 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 194A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6421 May 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2021/C 194 A/01 | Call for applications | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2021/C 194 A/01

Call for applications

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
CITY OF TRINIDAD, COLORADO, Petitioner v. Stephen HAMER

No. 19-283

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1586

AMNAH QAISER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION; LINDA MCMAHON; VANESSA 

PICCIONI,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cv-01627-JCC-MSN)

Submitted: May 24, 2017 Decided: June 7, 2017

Before KING, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charity Chidinma Emeronye Swift, Stephen Christopher Swift, SWIFT & SWIFT, 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW, PLLC, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Dana J. Boente, 

United States Attorney, Andrew S. Han, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, 

Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Amnah Qaiser appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for leave to 

amend her complaint and granting Defendants summary judgment on Qaiser’s 

discrimination and hostile work environment harassment claims, brought pursuant to 

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 

(2012). We have reviewed the record and have considered the parties’ arguments and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. See Quaiser v. SBA, No. 1:15-cv-01627-JCC-MSN (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 18, 2016 

& entered Mar. 21, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Smith Barney Managed Governments Fund Inc.
125 Broad Street
New York, NY 10004




CERTIFICATION




I, R. Jay Gerken, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form N-SAR of Smith Barney Managed
Governments Fund Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial information included in this
report, and the financial statements on which the financial information
is based, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows
(if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash
flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report.

September 27, 2002



/s/ R. Jay Gerken

R. Jay Gerken
President and Chief Executive Officer
CERTIFICATIONS



I, Douglas P. Condie, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this
amended quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A, for the quarter ended June 30, 2004,
of STAT Software, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a) 
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) 
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) 
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) 
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) 
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date:  May 2, 2005





/s/ Douglas P. Condie

President
IA 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 117 

Providing for the appointment of Michael Lynton as a citizen regent of 

the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 9, 2014 

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas (for himself, Mr. COLE, and Mr. BECERRA) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on House Administration 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the appointment of Michael Lynton as a citizen 

regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on 

5 the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in 

6 the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 

7 reason of the resignation of France A. Co ́rdova of Indiana 

8 on March 13, 2014 is filled by the appointment of Michael 

9 M. Lynton of California. The appointment is for a term 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 117 IH 

1 of 6 years, beginning on the date of the enactment of this 

2 joint resolution. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Gonzalo R. RUBANG, Jr., Petitioner v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC., et al.

No. 19-6198

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until December 30, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of President and Executive Vice President Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of LBI Media Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Jose Liberman, as President of the Company, and Lenard D. Liberman, as Executive Vice President of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ Jose LibermanJose Liberman President May 16, 2005




By:

/s/ Lenard LibermanLenard D. Liberman Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer May 16, 2005




This certification accompanies
the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Robert J. MURPHY, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL.

No. 19-1160.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 26, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District denied.
November 13, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

GLENN LLOYD KINGHAM, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00549-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The 

record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the 

appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.