alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BCTC V Assignor Corp. (the "registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|                |  |                            
|--------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:           |  |                            
|August 14, 2006 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|                |  |                            
|                |  | Marc N. Teal               
|                |  | Principal Financial Officer
|                |  |                            
|                |  |                            

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
SMITH BARNEY SECTOR SERIES INC.

ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT

Smith Barney Sector Series Inc., a Maryland corporation having its
principal office in the State of Maryland in Baltimore City
(hereinafter called the "Corporation"), hereby certifies to the
State Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland that:

FIRST:	The charter of the Corporation is hereby amended
to provide that any shares of the Corporation's Smith Barney
Natural Resources Fund Class A Common Stock, Class B Common Stock
and Class L Common Stock that are issued and outstanding
immediately prior to these Articles of Amendment becoming
effective, shall, upon these Articles of Amendment becoming
effective, be cancelled and, until thereafter reclassified, shall
be authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock of those
respective classes of the Smith Barney Natural Resources Fund of
the Corporation.

	SECOND:	The foregoing amendment to the charter of the
Corporation was advised by the board of directors of the
Corporation and approved by the stockholders entitled to vote
thereon in accordance with the Corporation's charter.

	The undersigned President of the Corporation acknowledges
these Articles of Amendment to be the corporate act of the
Corporation and states to the best of his knowledge, information
and belief that the matters and facts set forth in these Articles
with respect to authorization and approval are true in all
material respects and that this statement is made under the
penalties of perjury.

	IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Smith Barney Sector Series Inc. has
caused these Articles of Amendment to be signed in its name and on
its behalf by its President and witnessed by its Assistant
Secretary as of December 11, 2000.


WITNESS:				SMITH BARNEY SECTOR SERIES INC.




Michael Kocur			Heath B. McLendon
Assistant Secretary			President
- 2 -
Marcus Terrelle MARSH, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-774.

Supreme Court of the United States.

June 1, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/19/14          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      418,454
COMMITMENTS
 134,704  154,816  117,210  142,564  116,888  394,478  388,914   23,976   29,540

CHANGES FROM 08/12/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     27,613)
  26,051   31,497    2,778     -694   -4,219   28,135   30,056     -522   -2,443

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    32.2     37.0     28.0     34.1     27.9     94.3     92.9      5.7      7.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      195)
      60       77       82       39       42      146      166
```

----

Updated August 22, 2014
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32(b)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TRW
Automotive Holdings Corp. (the "Company") for the period ended June 25, 2004,
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Joseph S. Cantie, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: July 28, 2004                        /s/ Joseph S. Cantie
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Joseph S. Cantie
                                           Executive Vice President and Chief
                                           Financial Officer
                                           (Principal Financial Officer)

                                       43
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 97 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 97

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
relative to applying laws equally to the citizens of the United States 
                      and the Federal Government.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 22, 2013

   Ms. Jenkins introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
relative to applying laws equally to the citizens of the United States 
                      and the Federal Government.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Congress shall make no law applicable to a citizen of 
the United States that is not equally applicable to Congress.
    ``Section 2. Congress shall make no law applicable to a citizen of 
the United States that is not equally applicable to the executive 
branch of Government, including the President, Vice President, 
ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and all other officers 
of the United States, including those provided for under this 
Constitution and by law, and inferior officers to the President 
established by law.
    ``Section 3. Congress shall make no law applicable to a citizen of 
the United States that is not equally applicable to judges of the 
Supreme Court of the United States, including the Chief Justice, and 
judges of such inferior courts as Congress may from time to time ordain 
and establish.
    ``Section 4. Nothing in this article shall preempt any specific 
provision of this Constitution.''.
                                 <all>
```
Todd RICKS, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 18-9653

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Carol M. KAM, Petitioner, v. DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS, et al.

No. 19-31

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
Leeroy Cesar CARBALLO, Petitioner v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

No. 19-5985

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,188
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,711
<ALLOWANCES>                                       456
<INVENTORY>                                     53,255
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                76,224
<PP&E>                                          63,032
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,533
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 132,191
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,059
<BONDS>                                         44,996
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            81
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,562
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   132,191
<SALES>                                        199,442
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               199,442
<CGS>                                          145,228
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  197,926
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,861
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,345)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (497)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (848)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (848)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)
        

</TABLE>
Jesus FELIX-HERAS, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6179

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 12, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Dale W. EATON, Petitioner, v. Mike PACHECO, Warden.

No. 19-7810.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the *2772Tenth Circuit denied. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Manuel Antonio RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-9270

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| 1.     | Such                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31,                2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                     |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
| 2.     | The                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for                the period ending March 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                BTX Holdings, Inc. |

**BTX      HOLDINGS, INC.**

| By: | */s/                Scott J. Silverman*Chief                Executive Officer and Chief                Financial Officer |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
FIL ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T MAY 30, 2012 J OHN L EY CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 1- 12 43 9 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 1 :1 0- cv -2 18 87 -J AL JOR GE LUIS TAPANE S, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll Pet it io ne r-Ap pe ll an t, ve rs us STATE OF FLORIDA, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll Res po nd en t-Ap pe ll ee.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt forth e So ut he rnDis tri ctof F lo rid a
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (May 30 , 20 12 ) Befo re MAR CUS, MARTIN an d B LACK, Circ ui t J ud ge s. PER CURI AM: Jo rg e Lui s Tap an es , pro ceed in g p ro se, app eal s the di st ric t co urt’s d is m is sa lof

hi s 2 8 U.S.C. § 22 54 fed eral habe as pe ti ti on . W e g ran te d acert ifi cat e o f ap pe al ab il ity

(COA) o n two i ss ue s: 1) wh ethe r th e d is tri ctco urt erredinfai li ng to co ns tru e Tap an es ’s 28 U.S.C. § 2 25 4 p et it io n a s a 2 8 U.S.C. § 22 55 m ot io n; an d 2) whet he r, pu rs ua ntto 28 U.S.C. § 1 63 1, the di stric t co urt s ho ul d h av e tr an sf erre d th e p et it io n, as co ns tru ed , to th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e Mi dd le Dis tri ctof F lo rid a, whe re Tap an es ’s fed eral cri min al jud gm en t was en te red . Tap an es ’s bri ef o n app eal do es no t ad dr es s ei th er o f th es e is su es . As a res ul t, we co nc lu de th atTapa ne s h as ab an do ne d the m . See Tim so n v . Sam ps on , 51 8 F .3d87 0, 8 74 (11 th Cir . 20 08 ) (“ Whi le we readbri efs fil edby pro se l it ig an ts li be ral ly, is su es no t b rie fedonap pe al . . . are d eem edab an do ne d.” (ci ta ti on s om itte d) ). As fo r th os e is su es th atTapa ne s h as bri efed , we can no t ad dr es s the m . Ourpre ced en t m ak es itcle ar tha t, u nd er 2 8 U.S.C. § 22 53 (c)( 3) , ou r rev ie w is

“ li m it edto th e is su es sp eci fie d i n the COA ord er.” Ho dg es v. At t’y Gen., St at e o f Fl a., 50 6 F .3d13 37 , 13 40 (11 th Cir . 20 07 ). The ju dg m en t o f th e d is tri ctco urt i s th eref or e AFFIRMED.

2
Frank Stephon JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, et al.

No. 19-5558

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

*415Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Ivan VAZQUEZ-GONZALEZ, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 18-8604

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Henry H. Graham, certify that:

 

1. I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TNS, Inc.;

 

2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3  Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and have:

 

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonablelikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 

DATE: May 17, 2004

 
| /s/    Henry H. Graham, Jr. |                    |
|---------------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                                  | Henry H. Graham, Jr.    |   |
|                                  | Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                                       |                         |  |  |

 

----
# Official Journal C 9/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 9 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6313 January 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 9

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6313 January 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2020/C 9/01 | Contribution of the LXII COSAC — Helsinki, 1-3 December 2019 | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Parliament

2020/C 9/01

Contribution of the LXII COSAC — Helsinki, 1-3 December 2019

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Dimitri Bernard ROBINSON, Petitioner v. MICHIGAN

No. 19-5972

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
Davontah Lee NELSON, Petitioner v. Sherry L. BURT, Warden

No. 19-6153

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Umesh KAUSHAL, Petitioner v. INDIANA

No. 18-1499

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  August 4, 2009
    /s/ JOHN C. PLANTJohn C. PlantChief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ JOSEPH S. CANTIEJoseph S. CantieExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-22-00267-CV

PAIGE A. KESTER, Appellant

V.

STATE FARM LLOYDS, Appellee

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 153rd District Court

of Tarrant County (153-329343-21)

July 6, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the trial court’s judgment 

is affirmed.

It is further ordered that Appellant Paige A. Kester must pay all costs of this 

appeal.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By __/s/ Elizabeth Kerr_________________

 Justice Elizabeth Kerr