alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment No. 2 to David G. Boone Executive Employment Agreement




 Exhibit 10.8.10 
  
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO 
 EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 This Amendment No. 2 to Executive Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”) is entered
into as of January 14, 2004 by and between Staktek Corporation, a Texas corporation (the “Company”) and David G. Boone (“Executive;” collectively, the “Parties”). Capitalized
terms not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in that certain Executive Employment Agreement, dated August 20, 2003, between the Company and the Executive, as amended by Amendment No. 1, dated November 19, 2004 (the
“Agreement”). Each reference to a section number shall, unless otherwise expressly provided herein, refer to such enumerated section of the Agreement. 
  
 RECITALS 
  
 A.    The Agreement, as amended by Amendment No. 1, contains severance provisions that are applicable in the event
Executive voluntarily terminates his employment with the Company as a result of a reduction in Executive’s employment status, duties, compensation or benefits without Executive’s consent. 
  
 B.    Each of the Company and the
Executive wishes to amend the Agreement, as amended by Amendment No. 1, in connection with Executive’s continuing his employment relationship with the Company. 
  
 AGREEMENT 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows: 
  
 The proviso in the last sentence of Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 
  
 “; provided, however, that in no event shall a termination without ‘Cause’ include
Executive’s voluntary termination as a result of this Amendment changing Executive’s status, duties or benefits from Vice President and Chief Financial Officer to Vice President of Finance if such voluntary termination occurs after the
later of (i) March 12, 2004 or (ii) the closing of the Company’s initial public offering of its Common Stock (the later of (i) or (ii) being the ‘Transition Term Date.’)” 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have entered into this
Amendment as of the date first written above. 
  

	 STAKTEK CORPORATION

		
	By:	 	/s/    JAMES CADY
	 	

	 	 	 James Cady
 President and Chief Executive Officer

	
	 DAVID G. BOONE

	
	 /s/    DAVID G. BOONE


	David G. Boone
Exhibit 31.a

I, John P. Manning, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund V L.P.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|August 14, 2007 | /s/ John P. Manning
|--------------- | -------------------
|                | John P. Manning    
|                | Principal          
|                | Executive Officer  
|                |                    
|                |
Rhonda REID, Petitioner, v. Walter DONNELLY, et al.

No. 18-9513

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Juan Jose TULL-ABREU, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5975

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

April 02, 2010

Ms. Audrey Mullert Vicknair

Law Office of Audrey Mullert Vicknair

802 N. Carancahua, Suite 1350

Frost Bank Plaza

Corpus Christi, TX 78470

Ms. Sandee Lee Hart

Dies & Hart, LLP

1009 West Green Ave.

Orange, TX 77630

RE:Case Number:  06-1022

Court of Appeals Number:  10-04-00252-CV

Trial Court Number:  01-09-05938-CV

Style:DEL LAGO PARTNERS, INC., AND DEL LAGO PARTNERS, L.P. DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE ASSUMED NAME OF DEL LAGO GOLF RESORT & CONFERENCE CENTER, AND BMC-THE BENCHMARK MANAGEMENT COMPANY

v.

BRADLEY SMITH

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas issued opinions and judgment in the above-referenced cause.  You may obtain a copy of the opinions at: http://www.supreme.courts.state.tx.us/historical/recent.asp.  If you would like the opinions by email, please contact Claudia Jenks at claudia.jenks@courts.state.tx.us or call (512)463-1312 ext. 41367.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

**Case No. 06-1022Page 2**
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1132 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the Secretary of Defense 

to jointly ensure that the Vet Centers of the Department of Veterans 

Affairs have access to the Defense Personnel Record Image Retrieval 

system and the Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense Identity Repository system. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2013 

Mr. DENHAM (for himself and Mr. ROE of Tennessee) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, and in 

addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the Secretary 

of Defense to jointly ensure that the Vet Centers of 

the Department of Veterans Affairs have access to the 

Defense Personnel Record Image Retrieval system and 

the Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense Identity Repository system. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1132 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Efficient Service for 

3 Veterans Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. VET CENTER ACCESS TO DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

5 RECORD IMAGE RETRIEVAL SYSTEM AND 

6 VETERANS AFFAIRS/DEPARTMENT OF DE7 FENSE IDENTITY REPOSITORY SYSTEM. 

8 The Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the Secretary 

9 of Defense shall jointly ensure that each center established 

10 under section 1712A of title 38, United States Code, has 

11 access to— 

12 (1) the Defense Personnel Record Image Re13 trieval system; and 

14 (2) the Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense 

15 Identity Repository system. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Christopher Mark HEATH, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6420

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Jonathan Thomas WRIGHT, Petitioner v. WEST VIRGINIA

No. 19-5252

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
Walter BARTON, Petitioner, v. William STANGE, Warden.

No. 19-8483 19A1040

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 19, 2020

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice Gorsuch and by him referred to the Court denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Exhibit G

Case 2:24-cv-00021-JRG Document 54-8 Filed 07/18/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 3123
Case 2:24-cv-00021-JRG Document 54-8 Filed 07/18/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 3124
Larry B. RUBIN, Petitioner v. Hector SANCHEZ, et al.;

No. 18-9254

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
Independent Auditors' Report


To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
the Intermediate Muni Fund, Inc.:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements
of the Intermediate Muni Fund, Inc. (the  Fund ) for the year
ended December 31, 2002, we considered its internal control,
including control activities for safeguarding securities, in
order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of
expressing our opinion on the financial statements and to comply
with the requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on
internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Those controls include the safeguarding of assets against
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, error or
fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any
evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to
the risk that it may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in internal control that might be material
weaknesses under standards established by the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness is a
condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the
internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low
level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in
amounts that would be material in relation to the financial
statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a
timely period by employees in the normal course of performing
their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters involving
internal control and its operation, including controls for
safeguarding securities, that we consider to be material
weaknesses as defined above as of December 31, 2002.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management and the Board of Directors of the Fund and the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not intended to be and
should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.



                                             KPMG LLP
New York, New York
February 12, 2003
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION

The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December
31, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  February 7, 2003                                 /s/ Eric H. Paulson
                                                        -----------------------
                                                        Eric H. Paulson
                                                        Chairman of the Board,
                                                        President and
                                                        Chief Executive Officer


Date:  February 7, 2003                                 /s/ James Gilbertson
                                                        -----------------------
                                                        James Gilbertson
                                                        Vice President and
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, the undersigned certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this periodic
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ACT Teleconferencing, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Date: March 30, 2007



By:

/s/ Rick FresiaRick Fresia Principal Financial Officer
Marlon Leroy PORCH, Petitioner v. T. WATSON, Warden

No. 19-5589

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018321EN.01000701.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 11.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 321/7 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.8995 — MAGNA/OLSA)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 321/05)

1.

On 4 September 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 and following a referral pursuant to Article 4(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018321EN.01000701-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Magna Closures S.p.A. (‘MAGNA’, Italy); |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Olsa S.p.A. (‘OLSA’, Italy). |

MAGNA acquires, within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation, sole control over the whole of OLSA.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | MAGNA is an automotive supplier which manufactures and supplies automotive systems, assemblies, modules and components primarily for passenger cars and light commercial vehicles; |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | OLSA is an automotive supplier which manufactures and supplies lighting products for passenger cars and light commercial vehicles. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018321EN.01000701-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.8995 — MAGNA/OLSA

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| E-mail: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018321EN.01000701-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018321EN.01000701-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
H. Con. Res. 123 Agreed to December 12, 2014

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 3979, the Clerk 

of the House of Representatives shall make the following correction: 

In section 1207(e)(2), strike ‘‘categories I, II, III, VII, and X’’ and 

insert ‘‘categories I, II, III, VII, X, XI, and XIII’’. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 22, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-51055 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ARTURO JAIMES-JAIMES, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-99-CR-155-All-JN

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Arturo Jaimes-Jaimes (Jaimes), federal prisoner No. 95190- 080, has appealed the district court’s denial of his “Motion for Downward Departure Based on Post-Conviction Rehabilitation and Alien Status.” He contends that the district court had jurisdiction to reduce his sentence pursuant to United States v. Galante , 111 F.3d 1029, 1034 (2d Cir. 1997) and other cases which have held that a district court may consider post-convictionNo. 02-51055 -2- rehabilitation in determining whether to grant a downward departure. The district court is prohibited from modifying a term of imprisonment once it has been imposed except in certain limited circumstances. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). Jaimes’ post-conviction motion for downward departure does not fall under any provision of 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) and, thus, was unauthorized and without a jurisdictional basis. See United States v. Early , 27 F.3d 140, 141-42 (5th Cir. 1994). The appeal is without arguable merit. Consequently, it is DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. Jaimes is WARNED that future frivolous appeals may result in the imposition of sanctions.
APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
Timothy W. SPARROW, Petitioner, v. Rusty WASHBURN, Warden.

No. 19-5532

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Fernando A. RAMIREZ, Petitioner, v. Dave HOGUE, et al.

No. 19-876.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for rehearing denied.
# C_2018402EN.01000102.xml

| 8.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8766 — LKQ/Stahlgruber)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 402/02)

On 3 May 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8766. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8766. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
John Thomas ROONEY, Petitioner, v. GEORGIA

No. 19-5413

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia denied.
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF PERIODICREPORT**        I,Darren L. Miles, Chief Financial Officer of Earth Biofuels, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:        (1)        the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the six months ended June 30, 2006 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and        (2)        the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.    Date: May 18, 2007    /s/ Darren L. Miles  Darren L. Miles
# C_2018055EN.01000301.xml

| 14.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/3

---

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

(2018/C 55/04)

Pursuant to Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1), the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are hereby amended as follows:

1

2

On page 69, in the Explanatory note to CN subheading ‘1212 99 95 Other’, the following point is added at the end of the first paragraph:

On page 69, in the Explanatory note to CN subheading ‘1212 99 95 Other

| ‘3. | ground seeds of guarana (Paullinia cupana), neither roasted nor otherwise prepared.’. |
| --- | --- |

‘3.

ground seeds of guarana (Paullinia cupana), neither roasted nor otherwise prepared.’.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1).

1

(2)  OJ C 76, 4.3.2015, p. 1.

2

---