alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONS



I, Douglas P. Condie, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form
10-QSB of STAT Software, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date:  May 24, 2004

/s/ Douglas P. Condie

President
John BUNCICH, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-456

Supreme Court of the United States.

Nov. 12, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
GREENWICH STREET MUNICIPALS FUND INC.
10f-3 REPORT
October 1, 1997 through March 31, 1998

			Trade				     Par		Purchase	% 
of
Issuer			Date	Selling Dealer		Amount	 
	Price		Issue

Michigan State Bldg. Auth.	11/17/97	Lehman Brothers		$1,500,000
	$94.655		7.56%
4.750% due 10/15/2013

Met Water So. California	11/20/97	Morgan Stanley		  2,500,000	  
96.753		3.95
5.000% due 7/1/2018

Puerto Rico Infrastructure	11/21/97	Goldman Sachs		  1,225,000	  
97.631
		3.57
5.000% due 7/1/2016

NYS Dorm Auth. Ment. Hlth.11/21/97	Paine Webber		  1,500,000	  97.514
		25.02
5.125% due 8/15/2017

New Jersey Trans Authority	12/10/97	Goldman Sachs		  2,500,000	  
94.922
		7.28
4.750% due 6/15/2016

NYS Local Gov't Asst. Corp.	12/18/97	Lehman Brothers		  
1,500,000	  96.120		15.70
4.875% due 4/1/2020

NYS Dorm City University	3/30/98	Goldman Sachs		  1,000,000	  
97.769
		17.10
5.000% due 7/1/16
Khalil STAFFORD, Petitioner v. NEW JERSEY

No. 19-6099

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division denied.
James Philip DOUGLAS, Petitioner v. Margaret GILBERT, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center.

No. 19-6302

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Travis Trevino RUNNELS, Petitioner v. TEXAS

No. 19-6875 (19A639)

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 11, 2019

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the Court denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
Demicko Billie THOMAS, Petitioner v. Maggie MILLER-STOUT, Warden, et al.

No. 19-6898

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Burton Maurice KAHN, petitioner, v. Robert RIPLEY.

No. 19-6475

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# C_2018199EN.01000102.xml

| 11.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 199/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 199/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8865 — AIG/Validus)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 199/02)

On 29 May 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8865. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8865. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# AGENCY:

United States Commission on Civil Rights.

# ACTION:

Notice of Commission public business meeting.

# DATES:

Friday, May 13, 2022, 12:00 p.m. EST.

# ADDRESSES:

Meeting to take place by telephone and is open to the public: 877-222-5769; Conference ID code #333206.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Angelia Rorison: 202-376-8371;                         *publicaffairs@usccr.gov*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the Government in Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), the Commission on Civil Rights is holding a meeting to discuss the Commission's business for the month. This business meeting is open to the public. Computer assisted real-time transcription (CART) will be provided. The web link to access CART (in English) on Friday, May 13, 2022, is                     *https://www.streamtext.net/​player?​event=​USCCR.*                     Please note that CART is text-only translation that occurs in real time during the meeting and is not an exact transcript.                

## Meeting Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda

II. Business Meeting

A. Presentations by State Advisory Committee Chairs on Released Reports and Memorandums

B. Discussion and Vote on Advisory Committee Appointments

C. Management and Operations
    - Staff Director's Report

III. Adjourn Meeting

Dated: May 6, 2022.

Angelia Rorison,

USCCR Media and Communications Director.

[FR Doc. 2022-10098 Filed 5-6-22; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
Andre WILLIAMSON, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6627

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 16, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Bridget Anne KELLY, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 18-1059

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 16, 2019

Motion of respondent William Baroni for divided argument granted.
Martin AVALOS-RICO, aka Rolando Blanco-Garcia, aka Oscar Cruz-Tulum, aka Alejandro Tamayo, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5472

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
# C_2018037EN.01000202.xml

| 1.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8734 — Mitsui/GSC/CaetanoBus)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 37/03)

On 19 January 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8734. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8734. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Ottis J. CUMMINGS, Jr., aka Ottis Junior Cummings, aka Otis Cummings, aka Ottis J. Cummings, aka Otis J. Cummings, Petitioner v. MISSISSIPPI

No. 19-5322

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Mississippi denied.
Order entered October 8 , 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 00747 - CV TRANSAMERICA LIFE IN SURANCE COMPANY, Appellant V. JILLIAN HELMER, Appellee On Appeal fr om the 192nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 96 - 06849 No. 05 - 18 - 01120 - CV IN RE TRANSAMERICA L IFE INSURANCE COMPAN Y , Relator Original Proceeding from the 192nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 96 - 06849



### O RDER Before Justices Lang, Myers, and Whitehill Before the Court is appellant’s motion to consolidate appeal and original proceeding . Appellant asks the Court to consolidate its appeal docketed as cause number 05 - 18 - 00747 - CV with the original proceed ing filed September 25, 2018 and docketed as cause number 05 - 18 - 01120 - CV in which appellant seek s a writ of mandamus.We GRANT the motion and ORDER cause number 05 - 1 8 - 01120 - CV

CONSOLIDATED into cause number 05 - 1 8 - 0 0747 - CV. We DIRECT the Clerk of Court to remove all docum ents from cause number 05 - 1 8 - 01120 - CV and refile them in cause number 05 - 1 8 - 0 0747 - CV and to treat cause number 05 - 1 8 - 01120 - CV as a closed case. We ORDER that all future pleadings be filed in and bear only cause numbe r 05 - 1 8 - 0 0747 - CV. We request that appellee Jillian Helmer file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus filed by appellant in cause number 05 - 18 - 01120 - CV . We DIRECT appellee to include in her appellee’s brief in cause number 05 - 18 - 00774 - CV any res ponse to the petition for writ of mandamus . The consolidated response shall be filed by October 24 , 2018 . /s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG JUSTICE
FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MAY 11 2000 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK PUBLISH

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6261

D. C. Docket No. CV-97-D-1396-N BILL PRYOR, Attorney General for the State of Alabama, STATE OF ALABAMA, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus JANET RENO, Attorney General of the United States, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
(May 11, 2000) ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Before TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge, GODBOLD and HILL, Senior Circuit Judges.2 BY THE COURT: The Supreme Court of the United States , having vacated and remanded this case for further consideration in the light of Reno v. Condon , 528 U.S. _____ (2000), it is therefore ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that the judgment of the district court in the above-referenced case is hereby VACATED and the case is REMANDED to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama for fu rther consideration in light of Reno v. Condon , 528 U.S. _____ (2000). DONE AND ORDERED this 11th day of May, 2000.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1934

BRANDEN TOLLIVER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District 

Judge. (8:12-cv-01821-PJM)

Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 26, 2012

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit 

Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Branden Tolliver, Appellant Pro Se. Karen Grace Gregory, 

Bridget Maria Rowan, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 

Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Branden Tolliver appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing without prejudice his federal income tax refund suit. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. See Tolliver v. IRS, No. 8:12-cv-01821-PJM (D. Md. 

July 3, 2012). We deny Tolliver’s motion for district court 

correction and we dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

FERNANDO MAGALDE,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-12-00064-CR

Appeal from

120th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 20100D06141)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 2014.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice 

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
Clarence SCRANAGE, Jr., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9308

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Sean M. DONAHUE, Petitioner v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 19-6487

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District denied.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

David J. Olean, :

Petitioner :

:

v. : No. 604 M.D. 2020

:

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, :

Respondent :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, January 11, 2022

, upon consideration of P etitioner’s

application for re consideration

, and R espondent’ s answer in response thereto,

the application is denied.
Kenneth MEDENBACH, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5201

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Charles G. KINNEY, Petitioner v. Philip S. GUTIERREZ, Judge, United States District Court for the Central District of California

No. 19-443

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1085 

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to extend 

to 2025 the production certificate program that allows refunds of duties 

on certain articles produced in United States insular possessions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 12, 2013 

Mrs. CHRISTENSEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 

States to extend to 2025 the production certificate program that allows refunds of duties on certain articles 

produced in United States insular possessions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1085 IH

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF PRODUCTION CERTIFICATE 

2 PROGRAM FOR CERTAIN PRODUCTS OF 

3 UNITED STATES INSULAR POSSESSIONS. 

4 Additional U.S. Note 5(h)(i) to chapter 91 of the 

5 Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by striking ‘‘2015’’ and inserting ‘‘2025’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Gary A. BAILEY, Petitioner, v. Darrel VANNOY, Warden.

No. 19-6997

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Marty J. HEBERT, Petitioner v. LOUISIANA

No. 18-9094

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Donald Wayne LAMOUREAUX, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES

No. 18-9827

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Claim Evidence

1.A method

comprising:

Defendant provides symbology (i.e., a QR code), associated with the website of Macy’s. 

Source: Image of Defendant provided QR Code.

Infringement Claim Chart for U.S. Pat. No.US8936190B2 Vs Macy’s (“Defendant”)

Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-6 Filed 04/29/24 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 330
Source: Screenshots taken from portable electronic device, hereinafter a “Smartphone”.

QR Code Scan Decode Action

Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-6 Filed 04/29/24 Page 2 of 8 PageID #: 331
a)capturing

a digital

image using

a digital

image

capturing

device that

is part of an

electronic

device;

Defendant uses, or induces the use of,a camera (digital image capturing device) on a Smartphone that captures the 

digital image.

Source: Screenshot taken from Smartphone.

Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-6 Filed 04/29/24 Page 3 of 8 PageID #: 332
b)detecting

symbology

associated

with the

digital

image using

the

electronic

device;

Defendant uses, or induces the use of, a Smartphone to detect symbology (i.e., QR code) associated with the 

website of Macy’s.

Source: Screenshot taken from Smartphone.

Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-6 Filed 04/29/24 Page 4 of 8 PageID #: 333
c) decoding

the

symbology

to obtain a

decode

string using

one or more

visual

detection

applications

residing on

the

electronic

device;

Defendant decodes, or induces the decoding of, the QR code pattern to obtain a decode string (i.e., hyperlink) using 

the camera application residing in the Smartphone. 

Source: Screenshot taken from Smartphone.

Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-6 Filed 04/29/24 Page 5 of 8 PageID #: 334
FRE 408 Communication

d) sending

the decode

string to a

remote

server for

processing;

Defendant sends, or induces the sending of, the decoded string to a remote server for processing. Specifically, the 

Smartphone sends the information associated with the QR code tothe Macy’s server.

Source: Screenshot taken from Smartphone.

Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-6 Filed 04/29/24 Page 6 of 8 PageID #: 335
e) receiving

information

about the

digital

image from

the remote

server

wherein the

information

is based on

the decode

string;

After the Defendant, or one induced by the Defendant, clicks on the hyperlink that is obtained by scanning the QR 

code associated with the Macy’s website, the Smartphone receives the information and navigates directly to the 

website of Macy’s.

Source: Screenshot taken from Smartphone.

Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-6 Filed 04/29/24 Page 7 of 8 PageID #: 336
f) displaying

the

information

on a display

device

associated

with the

electronic

device.

Defendant sends, or induces the sending of, the decoded string to a remote server (in this case, a Macy’s server) for 

processing.The information is received and it is displayed on the display associated with the Smartphone as shown 

below.

Source: Screenshot taken from Smartphone.

Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-6 Filed 04/29/24 Page 8 of 8 PageID #: 337
XIU JIAN SUN, petitioner, v. SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, QUEENS COUNTY.

No. 17-1522.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
----

F-Cayenne: operation of scheduled air services

Notice of cancellation of the invitation to tender issued by France pursuant to Article 4(1)(d) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 for the operation of scheduled air services between Cayenne on the one hand and Mariapasoula, Saül et Grand-Santi via Saint-Laurent-du-Maroni on the other

(‘Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union’ S 10 of 17.1.2006, open procedure, 10383-2006)

(2006/C 52/11)

Conseil régional de la Guyane, direction du développement, de l'économie et de l'aménagement, service aménagement et développement du territoire, route de Montabo, rond-point de Suzini, 3ème étage, BP 7025, F-97307 Cayenne Cedex. Tél.: (594) 27 11 93. Fax: (594) 27 12 88.

France has decided to cancel the invitations to tender issued pursuant to Article 4(1)(d) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 for operation of scheduled air services between Cayenne on the one hand and Maripasoula, Saül and Grand-Santi via Saint-Laurent-du-Maroni on the other which was published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 17 January 2006 under reference 2006/C11/16.

----