35996 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 14, 2022 / Notices 

all Respondents other than Realtek are 

named in the patent license agreement 

and/or release agreements. Id. at 4 n.2. 

For those not named, the ID stated that 

‘‘termination by settlement under 

Commission Rule 210.21(b) would not 

be appropriate, as opposed to general 

withdrawal under Commission Rule 

210.21(a).’’ Id. The ID found that 

‘‘[r]egardless, the motion complies with 

all Commission Rules.’’ Id. The ID also 

found that ‘‘there are no extraordinary 

circumstances that warrant denying the 

motion’’ and ‘‘there is no evidence 

indicating that terminating this 

investigation based on various 

agreements would be contrary to the 

public interest.’’ Id. at 4, 5. The ID also 

noted that the motion attached 

confidential and public versions of the 

agreements. Id. at 4. No petition for 

review of the ID was filed. 

The Commission has determined not 

to review the subject ID. The 

investigation is terminated in its 

entirety. 

The Commission vote for this 

determination took place on June 9, 

2022. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in Part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR part 

210. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: June 9, 2022. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2022–12794 Filed 6–13–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1273] 

Certain Residential Premises Security 

Monitoring and Automation Panels, 

and Components Thereof; Notice of 

Commission Determination Not To 

Review an Initial Determination of NonInfringement; Termination of the 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

(Order No. 18) of the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) 

granting summary determination of no 

violation based on non-infringement of 

the asserted patent claims. The 

investigation is terminated. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Robert Needham, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–2392. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 

5, 2021, the Commission instituted this 

investigation under section 337 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 

U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section 337’’), based on a 

complaint filed by ADT LLC and the 

ADT Security Corporation, both of Boca 

Raton, Florida, (collectively, ‘‘ADT’’). 86 

FR 42879–80. The complaint, as 

supplemented, alleges a violation of 

section 337 based upon the importation 

into the United States, sale for 

importation, or sale after importation 

into the United States of certain 

residential premises security monitoring 

and automation control panels, and 

components thereof by reason of 

infringement of claims 1 and 12 of U.S. 

Patent No. 8,976,937 (‘‘the ’937 patent’’) 

and claims 1–4, 7–15, and 18–20 of U.S. 

Patent No. 9,286,772 (‘‘the ’772 patent’’). 

Id. at 42880. The complaint also alleges 

the existence of a domestic industry. 

The notice of investigation names as a 

respondent Vivint, Inc., of Provo, Utah 

(‘‘Vivint’’). Id. The Office of Unfair 

Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) is also a 

party to the investigation. 87 FR 476 

(Jan. 5, 2022). 

The Commission subsequently 

terminated the investigation with 

respect to all asserted claims of the ’937 

patent and claims 1, 7–12, and 18–20 of 

the ’772 patent based on withdrawal of 

the complaint as to those claims. Order 

No. 10 (Dec. 17, 2021), unreviewed by 

Notice (Jan. 18, 2022); Order No. 15 

(Mar. 21, 2022), unreviewed by Notice 

(Apr. 12, 2022). Claims 2, 3, and 4 of the 

’772 patent are therefore the only claims 

that remain in the investigation. 

On March 10, 2022, Vivint moved for 

a summary determination pursuant to 

Commission Rule 210.18 (19 CFR 

210.18) of no violation of section 337 

based on invalidity, and alternatively, 

non-infringement. Vivint argued that the 

‘‘processor’’ limitations of the asserted 

claims should be construed to allow 

those limitations to be satisfied by 

multiple processors, and that under that 

construction, all the asserted claims are 

invalid as anticipated by U.S. Patent 

Pub. No. 2010/0102171. Vivint 

alternatively argued that, if the 

‘‘processor’’ limitations of the asserted 

claims are construed to require that a 

single processor must satisfy all of the 

‘‘processor’’ limitations, none of the 

accused products infringe the asserted 

claims because no single processor 

satisfies all the ‘‘processor’’ limitations. 

On March 21, 2022, ADT filed a 

response opposing the motion, arguing 

that the ‘‘processor’’ limitations require 

a single processor, but contending that 

the accused products contained a 

processor that satisfied all the 

limitations. On March 28, OUII filed a 

response in support of the motion, 

arguing that the ‘‘processor’’ limitations 

require at least one processor that 

satisfies all the ‘‘processor’’ limitations 

and that the accused products do not 

infringe because they do not contain a 

processor that satisfies all of the 

‘‘processor’’ limitations. On March 24, 

2022, and March 31, 2022, Vivint filed 

replies to ADT’s and OUII’s responses, 

respectively. 

On April 22, 2022, the ALJ issued the 

subject ID (Order No. 18) pursuant to 

Commission Rules 210.18(b) and 

210.42(c) (19 CFR 210.18(b), 210.42(c)), 

granting in part Vivint’s motion and 

finding summary determination of no 

violation because ADT failed to 

establish that the accused products 

infringe any asserted claim. The ID finds 

that the ‘‘processor’’ limitations require 

at least one processor that satisfies all of 

the ‘‘processor’’ limitations, and that 

ADT failed to show that the accused 

products contain a ‘‘processor’’ that 

satisfies all the ‘‘processor’’ limitations. 

On May 4, 2022, ADT filed a petition 

for review of the ID. Also on May 4, 

2022, Vivint filed a contingent petition 

for review of the ID. On May 9, 2022, 

Vivint responded to ADT’s petition, and 

on May 11, 2022, ADT responded to 

Vivint’s contingent petition for review. 

Also on May 11, 2022, OUII responded 

to both petitions. 

The Commission has determined not 

to review the subject ID. The 

investigation is hereby terminated with 

a finding of no violation. 

The Commission vote for this 

determination took place on June 8, 

2022. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 14, 2022 / Notices 35997 

1 Vice Chair Randolph J. Stayin did not 

participate, and Commissioner Rhonda K. 

Schmidtlein voted to conduct an expedited review. 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: June 8, 2022. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2022–12802 Filed 6–13–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 731–TA–696 (Fifth 

Review)] 

Pure Magnesium From China; Notice 

of Commission Determination To 

Conduct a Full Five-Year Review 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice that it will proceed with a full 

review pursuant to the Tariff Act of 

1930 to determine whether revocation of 

the antidumping duty order on pure 

magnesium from China would be likely 

to lead to continuation or recurrence of 

material injury within a reasonably 

foreseeable time. A schedule for the 

review will be established and 

announced at a later date. 

DATES: June 6, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Charles Cummings (202–708–1666), 

Office of Investigations, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. 

Hearing-impaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server (https://

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

this review may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. 

For further information concerning 

the conduct of this review and rules of 

general application, consult the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, part 201, subparts A through 

E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, 

subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 

207). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 6, 

2022, the Commission determined that 

it should proceed to a full review in the 

subject five-year review pursuant to 

section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 

(19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). The Commission 

found that the domestic interested party 

group response to its notice of 

institution (87 FR 11472, March 1, 2022) 

was adequate. The Commission found 

that the respondent interested party 

group response was inadequate but 

found that other circumstances 

warranted conducting a full review.1 A 

record of the Commissioners’ votes will 

be available from the Office of the 

Secretary and at the Commission’s 

website. 

Authority: This review is being 

conducted under authority of title VII of 

the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is 

published pursuant to § 207.62 of the 

Commission’s rules. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: June 9, 2022. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2022–12815 Filed 6–13–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Determinations Regarding Eligiblity To 

Apply for Trade Adjustment 

Assistance 

In accordance with Sections 223 and 

284 (19 U.S.C. 2273 and 2395) of the 

Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2271, et 

seq.) (‘‘Act’’), as amended, the 

Department of Labor herein presents 

summaries of determinations regarding 

eligibility to apply for trade adjustment 

assistance under Chapter 2 of the Act 

(‘‘TAA’’) for workers by (TA–W) issued 

during the period of May 1, 2022 

through May 31, 2022. 

This notice includes summaries of 

initial determinations such as 

Affirmative Determinations of 

Eligibility, Negative Determinations of 

Eligibility, and Determinations 

Terminating Investigations of Eligibility 

within the period. If issued in the 

period, this notice also includes 

summaries of post-initial 

determinations that modify or amend 

initial determinations such as 

Affirmative Determinations Regarding 

Applications for Reconsideration, 

Negative Determinations Regarding 

Applications for Reconsideration, 

Revised Certifications of Eligibility, 

Revised Determinations on 

Reconsideration, Negative 

Determinations on Reconsideration, 

Revised Determinations on remand from 

the Court of International Trade, and 

Negative Determinations on remand 

from the Court of International Trade. 

Affirmative Determinations for Trade 

Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Reason(s) 

98,157 ......... Bruker Handheld LLC, Bruker Nano Analytics Division.Kennewick, WA ....... Actual/Likely Increase in Imports following a Shift 

Abroad. 

98,206 ......... Ross Casting and Innovation, LLC ........................... Sidney, OH ............. Actual/Likely Increase in Imports following a Shift 

Abroad. 

98,222 ......... Integrated Textile Solutions, Inc ............................... Salem, VA ............... Increased Aggregate Imports. 

98,222A ....... Integrated Textile Solutions, Inc ............................... South Boston, VA ... Increased Aggregate Imports. 

98,231 ......... Woodcrafters Home Products LLC, MasterBrand 

Cabinets Inc., Fortune Brands.

Weslaco, TX ........... Increased Company Imports. 

98,238 ......... PCS Ferguson, Inc ................................................... Frederick, CO ......... Increased Company Imports. 

98,246 ......... Home Products International North America, Inc ..... Seymour, IN ............ Increased Company Imports. 

98,257 ......... NeuWave Medical Inc., Supply Chain/Operations 

Division.

Madison, WI ............ Shift in Production to an FTA Country or Beneficiary. 

98,258 ......... Schneider Electric Buildings Americas, Inc., GSC 

NAM Electronics Clovis.

Clovis, CA ............... Shift in Production to an FTA Country or Beneficiary. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1