alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Mauro Castanada PALACIO, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6719

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Eduardo OROZCO, Petitioner v. CALIFORNIA

No. 19-5698

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.
# C_2004217EN.01003502.xml

| 28.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/35

---

Action brought on 28 June 2004 by Mundipharma AG against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

(Case T-256/04)

(2004/C 217/63)

Language of the case to be determined pursuant to Article 131(2) of the Rules of Procedure - language in which the application was submitted: German

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 28 June 2004 by Mundipharma AG, Basel (Switzerland), represented by F. Nielsen, lawyer.

Altana Pharma AG, Konstanz (Germany), was also a party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 19 April 2004 (Case R 1004/2002-2); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 19 April 2004 (Case R 1004/2002-2);

| — | order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

| Applicant for Community trade mark: | ALTANA Pharma AG |
| --- | --- |
| Community trade mark sought: | Word mark 'RESPICUR' for goods in Class 5 (Respiratory therapeutics) – Application No 949156 |
| Proprietor of mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: | The applicant |
| Mark or sign cited in opposition. | German word mark 'RESPICORT' for goods in Class 5 (pharmaceutical preparations; preparations for medical purposes; plasters) |
| Decision of the Opposition Division: | Rejection of the opposition |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Annulment of the decision of the Opposition Division and rejection of the opposition |
| Pleas in law: | Breach of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94. |

Applicant for Community trade mark:

ALTANA Pharma AG

Community trade mark sought:

Word mark 'RESPICUR' for goods in Class 5 (Respiratory therapeutics) – Application No 949156

Proprietor of mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

The applicant

Mark or sign cited in opposition.

German word mark 'RESPICORT' for goods in Class 5 (pharmaceutical preparations; preparations for medical purposes; plasters)

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Rejection of the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Annulment of the decision of the Opposition Division and rejection of the opposition

Pleas in law:

Breach of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94.

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Epsilon Energy Ltd. (the “Corporation”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|  | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Corporation. |
|--|-----|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Date: March 29, 2019    |   |
|                    |   |
| /s/ Michael Raleigh     |   |
| Michael Raleigh         |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
# C_2017425EN.01001001.xml

| 12.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 425/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 425/10

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its meeting of 30 May 2017 regarding a draft decision relating to Case AT.38238 — Raw Tobacco — Spain

Rapporteur: Poland

(2017/C 425/07)

| (1) | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the Decision of 20 October 2004 can be amended by means of a decision pursuant to Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the Decision of 20 October 2004 can be amended by means of a decision pursuant to Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003.

| (2) | The Advisory Committee shares the Commission’s assessment, as expressed in its draft Decision as communicated to the Advisory Committee on 30 May 2017, that the fine imposed (with joint and several liability) on Alliance One International Inc., its legal predecessors, and its subsidiary World Wide Tobacco España, SA, should be reduced by the amount of reduction which World Wide Tobacco España, SA obtained in its individual appeal against the Decision of 20 October 2004. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Advisory Committee shares the Commission’s assessment, as expressed in its draft Decision as communicated to the Advisory Committee on 30 May 2017, that the fine imposed (with joint and several liability) on Alliance One International Inc., its legal predecessors, and its subsidiary World Wide Tobacco España, SA, should be reduced by the amount of reduction which World Wide Tobacco España, SA obtained in its individual appeal against the Decision of 20 October 2004.

| (3) | The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

---
Dorian JOHNSON, Petitioner v. CITY OF FERGUSON, MISSOURI, et al.

No. 19-345

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Consent of Independent Auditors



 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT 
  
 To the Board of Directors of Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company 
  
 We consent to the use in this Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-109620 on Form N-4 of our
report dated March 6, 2003, on Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company (which report on Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs referring to the use of statutory accounting
practices and the adoption, effective January 1, 2001, of certain statutory accounting practices as a result of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Division of Insurance’s adoption of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners’
Accounting Practices and Procedures Manual, which practices differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America) appearing in the Statement of Additional Information, which is a part of such Registration Statement,
and to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in such Statement of Additional Information. 
  
 Deloitte & Touche LLP 
  
 Hartford,
Connecticut 
 February 10, 2004
#### Edgar HIDALGO, Appellant, v. FIDELITY & CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Appellee.

No. 14242.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

July 10, 1953.

James G. Dubuisson, Dubuisson & Dubuisson, Opelousas, La., for appellant.

A. R. Christovich, Jr., Christovich & Kearney, New Orleans, for appellee.

Before HOLMES, BORAH, and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges.

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

In this case the injury occurred in Alabama, which is the only difference between it and the case of Weingartner v. Fidelity Mutual Insurance Company, 5 Cir., 205 F. 2d 833. Therefore, upon the authority of the latter case and the Louisiana statute therein cited, the judgment appealed from, 104 F.Supp. 230, is affirmed.

Affirmed.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET-WTI - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                      Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/11/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      473,957
COMMITMENTS
  80,901   50,326  121,973  255,713  290,819  458,587  463,118   15,370   10,839

CHANGES FROM 11/04/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      4,756)
   4,593    3,016   10,133  -10,491   -7,361    4,235    5,788      521   -1,032

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    17.1     10.6     25.7     54.0     61.4     96.8     97.7      3.2      2.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      136)
      31       31       57       65       65      127      127
```

----

Updated November 14, 2014
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

NATHANIEL JONES, III, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23-CV-222

§

GWENDOLYN SPURLOCK, et al., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Nathaniel Jones, III, a prisoner previously confined at the Polunsky Unit of the

Texas Department of Criminal Justice, CorrectionalInstitutions Division (TDCJ-CID), proceeding

pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Gwendolyn Spurlock,

Sarah Horace, Robert L. Tanner, III, Charles C. Hicks, and unidentified Defendants.

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States

Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders

of this court. On June 12, 2024, the magistrate judge recommended dismissing the action without

prejudice for want of prosecution pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), unless Plaintiff paid the full

filing fee within fourteen days. To date, the parties have not filed objections to the report. 

Plaintiff has not paid the full filing fee.

The court received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available

evidence. After careful review, the court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of

the United States Magistrate Judge are correct. 

Case 9:23-cv-00222-MAC-CLS Document 23 Filed 08/01/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 92
Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are

correct, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (#21) is

ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate

judge’s recommendation. The clerk of court is directed to refund $184.00 to the plaintiff. 

2

.

 ________________________________________

 MARCIA A. CRONE

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 7th day of September, 2004. SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 1st day of August, 2024.

Case 9:23-cv-00222-MAC-CLS Document 23 Filed 08/01/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 93
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 VIASPACE INC.
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of VIASPACE Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: November 10, 2006
    /s/ CARL KUKKONENCarl KukkonenChief Executive Officer 34
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of SeaBright Insurance Holdings, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, John G. Pasqualetto,
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Dated:  November 9,
2009
  /s/ John G. PasqualettoJohn
      G. PasqualettoChairman,
      President and Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to SeaBright Insurance Holdings, Inc. and will
be retained by SeaBright Insurance Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 Decided January 23, 2006

Before Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge Hon. ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge Hon. ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge No. 03-4047 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee ,
v. LELAND B. HALL, Defendant-Appellant

. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin No. 03 CR 2 Randolph T. Randa, Chief Judge

.
O R D E R Leland Hall was sentenced for possessing a gun as a felon. On appeal, he argued that the district court erred by sentencing him under the formerly mandatory sentencing guidelines, see United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220, 125 S. Ct. 738, 160 L. Ed. 2d 621 (2005). We ordered a limited remand, United States v. Paladino

, 401 F.3d 471, 484 (7th Cir. 2005), and the district court said that it would have imposed the same sentence had it known that the guidelines were advisory. That sentence was within a properly calculated guideline range and presumptively reasonable, see United States v. Mykytiuk , 415 F.3d 606, 608 (7th Cir. 2005). Hall has failed to make any argument that his sentence is unreasonable when measured against the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. §3553(a). Id. at 607. Because Hall has not rebutted the presumption that the sentence is reasonable, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. UNPUBLISHED ORDER Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53
Scott Lynn GIBSON, aka Vanessa Lynn, Petitioner v. Brian COLLIER, et al.

No. 18-1586

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Jason ROSADO, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5246

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 21, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Francisco Herrera v. Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.

Appellate case number: 01

- 22

- 00793

- CV

Trial court case number: 2022

- 29152

Trial court: 281st District Court of Harris County

Appellant Francisco Herrera, Sr. filed an Unoppos e d Motion to S h orten Deadlin e for

Clerk ’ s Record. The motion is denied.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Veronica Rivas

- Molloy

Acting individually

Date: December 1 5

, 2022
AP9 R04-30-92 S:\FormsLib\Civil Bureau\Civil Courts & Post Judgment\Post Trial\Appeal Status Card Revised 01-18-2013

DATE: January 22, 2015

 NOTICE OF APPEALS

ASSIGNMENT OF COURT THE COURT OF APPEALS

TO: 14TH COURT OF APPEALS

From: Deputy Clerk: PHYLLIS WASHINGTON

 Chris Daniel, District Clerk

Harris County, T E X A S

CAUSE: 2014-21879 

VOLUME PAGE OR IMAGE # 63552330 & 63829740

DUE: 02-02-15 ATTORNEY TBN #24049753

NOTICE OF APPEAL HAS BEEN ASSIGNED TO THE 14TH COURT OF APPEALS

DATE ORDER SIGNED: 12-16-14 & 01-13-15

MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL/MOTION TO RECONSIDER DATE FILED: 12-29-14

REQUEST TRANSCRIPT DATE FILED NO REQUEST– RULE 34.5

NOTICE OF APPEAL DATE FILED: 01-21-15

NUMBER OF DAYS: ( CLERKS RECORD ) 10- Possible Post Judgment Filing Pending 14TH

FILE ORDERED: YES NO IMAGED FILED: YES NO 

CODES FOR NOTICE OF APPEAL: D, OA

CHRIS DANIEL 

Harris County, District Clerk

 By: /s/PHYLLIS WASHINGTON

 PHYLLIS WASHINGTON, Deputy

BC NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED

BG NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED – GOVERNMENT

C JUDGMENT BEING APPEALED

D - ACCELERATED APPEAL

OA NO CLERK’S RECORD REQUEST FILED

O CLERK’S RECORD REQUEST FILED (W/NOTICE OF APPEAL)

NA AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 1/23/2015 3:43:33 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk










JURN7 (NSA#) JUSTICE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM JAN 23, 2015(C1) 

INT6510 CIVIL CASE INTAKE OPT: _____ - INT

 GENERAL PARTY INQUIRY PAGE: 1 - 1

 

CASE NUM: 201421879__ PJN> __ TRANS NUM: _________ CURRENT COURT: 61 PUB? _

CASE TYPE: BREACH OF CONTRACT CASE STATUS: READY DOCKET 

STYLE: STEWART, BRENDA VS SOUTH CENTRAL HOUSTON ACTION COUN

=============================================================================

 **** ACTIVE PARTIES **** 

 PJN PER/CONN COC BAR PERSON NAME PTY ASSOC. ATTY 

 NUM NUMBER STAT 

 _ 00005-0001 AGT SOUTH CENTRAL HOUSTON ACTION C 

 _ 00004-0001 DEF 24049753 CENTRAL CARE COMMUNITY HEALTH RICHARDS, ROX

 _ 00003-0001 DEF 24049753 SOUTH CENTRAL HOUSTON COMMUNIT RICHARDS, ROX

 _ 00002-0001 DEF 24049753 SOUTH CENTRAL HOUSTON ACTION C RICHARDS, ROX

 _ 00001-0001 PLT 24065505 STEWART, BRENDA JOHNSON, NIKE

 

 

 

 

==> (5) CONNECTION(S) FOUND 

1=INACTIVE 2=ATY. INQ. 3=ACT.ENTRY 4=ISS. SERV. 5=DOC. INQ. 

6=CASE INQ. 7=BACKWARD 8=FORWARD 9=PTY. ADDR. 10=REFRESH 11=HELP
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 129 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 129

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Appointing the day for the convening of the first session of the One 
                      Hundred Fourteenth Congress.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the first regular session 
of the One Hundred Four-

              

teenth Congress shall begin at noon on Tuesday, January 6, 2015.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 14, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             H. J. RES. 129

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 Appointing the day for the convening of the first session of the One 
                      Hundred Fourteenth Congress.
```
May 2, 1997

VIA EDGAR

Securities and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.

ATTN:   Office of Filings, Information and Consumer Services

RE:  	Smith Barney Appreciation Fund Inc. (the "Fund")
     	File No. 2-34576 and 811-1940

Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Rule 497(j) under the Securities Act of 1933, as 
amended, please accept this letter as certification that the 
prospectus and the statement of additional information for the 
above-referenced Fund does not differ from that contained in Post-
Effective Amendment No. 42 (the "Amendment") to the Fund's 
Registration Statement on Form N-1A. This Amendment was filed 
electronically on April 25, 1997 and went effective April 29, 1997.

Any comments on this filing  should be directed  to me of Smith 
Barney Mutual Funds Management Inc. at (212) 816-3579.

Please return an electronic transmittal as evidence of your 
receipt of this filing.

Very truly yours,

/s/David Barnett
                              					
David Barnett
Vice President and
Assistant General Counsel
var% 

Douglas 

Cherry Gibbons 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

VICTORIA-JOY GODWIN, 

Appellant, 

No. 69646 

vs. 

DRISS SBAI; AND BTISSAM GHALMI, 

Respondents. 

SLED 

FEB 0 1 2016 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

This is an appeal from an order granting a motion to dismiss 

appellant's complaint. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; 

Kerry Louise Earley, Judge. 

Our review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant 

to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the notice of 

appeal appears to be untimely filed under NRAP 4(a) because it appears 

that it was prematurely filed, before the entry of a final written judgment, 

and is therefore of no effect. See NRAP 4(a)(1); Rust v. Clark ety. School 

District, 103 Nev. 686, 747 P.2d 1380 (1987). Accordingly, we conclude 

that we lack jurisdiction, and we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 

(0) 1947A ongii. 
cc: Hon. Kerry Louise Earley, District Judge 

Victoria-Joy Godwin 

Btissam Ghalmi 

Driss Sbai 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

2 

(0) 1947A
Mario Alberto RUBI, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6610

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 16, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Pasqual Andres MCMURRY, Petitioner, v. NEVADA.

No. 19-6523

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nevada denied.