alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Donald E. Fowler, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of SumTotal Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SumTotal Systems, Inc.



/s/ DONALD E. FOWLERDonald E. Fowler Chief Executive Officer and Director Date: August 4, 2008


I, Neil J. Laird, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of SumTotal Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SumTotal Systems, Inc.



/s/ NEIL J. LAIRDNeil J. Laird Chief Financial Officer Date: August 4, 2008
# C_2018394EN.01000101.xml

| 30.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 394/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 394/1

---

RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 19 October 2018

to the Council of the European Union on the external auditors of De Nederlandsche Bank

(ECB/2018/25)

(2018/C 394/01)

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 27.1 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and the national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and the national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union.

| (2) | The mandate of De Nederlandsche Bank’s current external auditors, Deloitte Accountants BV, ends after the audit for the financial year 2018. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2019. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The mandate of De Nederlandsche Bank’s current external auditors, Deloitte Accountants BV, ends after the audit for the financial year 2018. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2019.

| (3) | De Nederlandsche Bank has selected KPMG Accountants NV as its external auditors for the financial years 2019 to 2022, with the option to extend the mandate on a yearly basis until the financial year 2025, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

De Nederlandsche Bank has selected KPMG Accountants NV as its external auditors for the financial years 2019 to 2022, with the option to extend the mandate on a yearly basis until the financial year 2025,

HAS ADOPTED THIS RCOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that KPMG Accountants NV should be appointed as the external auditors of De Nederlandsche Bank for the financial years 2019 to 2022, with the option to extend the mandate on a yearly basis until the financial year 2025.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 19 October 2018.

The President of the ECB

Mario DRAGHI

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                         157,813
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,675,107
<ALLOWANCES>                                    48,077
<INVENTORY>                                  1,593,645
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,625,146
<PP&E>                                       4,291,772
<DEPRECIATION>                                 793,182
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,448,736
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,470,376
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,401
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,375,898
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,448,736
<SALES>                                     13,770,912
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,770,912
<CGS>                                        9,647,232
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,294,170
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (135,260)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             451,316
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,513,454
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (493,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,006,454
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,006,454
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.64






</TABLE>
Angela ROY, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5553

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
IN RE E. Edward ZIMMERMANN, Petitioner.

No. 18-9582

Supreme Court of the United States.

Nov. 18, 2019

Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.
Carlos Miguel PEREZ, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5565

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of *Rehaif* v. *United States* , 588 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 2191, 204 L.Ed.2d 594 (2019).
Willie Anthony SAXBY, Jr., Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9427

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Donald J. TRUMP, President of the United States, et al., Petitioners, v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, et al.

No. 18-588

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 1, 2019

A total of 80 minutes is allotted for oral argument, and the time is divided as follows: 40 minutes for the Solicitor General, 20 minutes for private respondents, and 20 minutes for state respondent.
IN RE Richard J. FIELDS, Petitioner;

No. 19-410

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Dwayne Dumont HAIZLIP, Petitioner v. Joseph VALLIERE.

No. 19-6539

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Anthony L. VIOLA, Petitioner v. Bradley TATE, Warden.

No. 19-5659

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

*559Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
# C_2018432EN.01000101.xml

| 30.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 432/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 432/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8689 — Rubis/Phillips 66/Zeller & Cie)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 432/01)

On 21 December 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8689. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8689. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Power of Attorney



 Exhibit 4.19 
 Power of Attorney 
 I, Zhiguo WANG, a Chinese citizen with Chinese
Identification Card No.: 232102196212185810, and a holder of 76.65% of the entire registered capital in Harbin Hongdoushan Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd. (the “Company”) (“My Shareholding”), hereby irrevocably
authorize Heilongjiang Jingshangjing Bio-Technology Development Co., Limited (“WFOE”) to exercise the following rights relating to My Shareholding during the term of this Power of Attorney: 

WFOE is hereby authorized to act on behalf of myself as my exclusive agent and attorney with respect to all matters concerning My
Shareholding, including without limitation to: 1) attend shareholders’ meetings of Company; 2) exercise all the shareholder’s rights and shareholder’s voting rights I am entitled to under the laws of China and Company’s Articles
of Association, including but not limited to the sale or transfer or pledge or disposition of My Shareholding in part or in whole; and 3) designate and appoint on behalf of myself the legal representative, the executive director, supervisor, the
manager and other senior management members of Company. 
 Without limiting the generality of the powers granted hereunder, WFOE
shall have the power and authority under this Power of Attorney to execute the Transfer Contracts stipulated in Exclusive Option Agreement, to which I am required to be a party, on behalf of myself, and to effect the terms of the Share Pledge
Agreement and Exclusive Option Agreement, both dated the date hereof, to which I am a party. 
 All the actions associated with
My Shareholding conducted by WFOE shall be deemed as my own actions, and all the documents related to My Shareholding executed by WFOE shall be deemed to be executed by me. I hereby acknowledge and ratify those actions and/or documents by WFOE.

 WFOE is entitled to re-authorize or assign its rights related to the aforesaid matters to any other person or entity at its
own discretion and without giving prior notice to me or obtaining my consent. 
 This Power of Attorney is coupled with an
interest and shall be irrevocable and continuously valid from the date of execution of this Power of Attorney, so long as I am a shareholder of Company. 
 During the term of this Power of Attorney, I hereby waive all the rights associated with My Shareholding, which have been authorized to WFOE through this Power of Attorney, and shall not exercise such
rights by myself. 
 This Power of Attorney is written in Chinese and English; in case there is any conflict between the Chinese
version and the English version, the Chinese version shall prevail. 

  
 1 








 
			
	Zhiguo WANG
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Zhiguo Wang

	
	November 5th, 2010


  

			
	 Witness:
	 	 /s/ Shumei Huang

	
	 Name:

	
	 November 5th, 2010



  
 2
# C_2018327EN.01000101.xml

| 17.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 327/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 327/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7000 — Liberty Global/Ziggo)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 327/01)

On 30 May 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M7000. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M7000. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Patricia GILL, Petitioner v. MERCY COLLEGE, et al.

No. 19-5503

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

*403Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
## 2007 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

6-11-2007 

# K e ndr ick v . DA P hi l a delphi a
P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 02-3158

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s at : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . v i l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2007

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2007 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. F or mor e infor m at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min
. C a rl s on@l a

w . v i l l a no va . e du

. 

## Re c omme nde d C it at ion

" Ke ndr ick v

. D A P hi l a de lp hi a" (2007). 2007 D e cisio n s . P ape r 847. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . v i l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2007/847* 

## This case was argued before the panel of J udges Becker, Alito, and Chertoff on January 13, 2004. Judge Michael Chertoff subsequently resigned on February 15, 2005. Judge, now Justice, Samuel A. Alito, Jr. was elevated to the Un ited States Supreme Court on January 31, 2006. Judge Edward R. Becker passed away on May 19, 2006. The panel was reconstituted on June 6, 2006 to consist of Judges Sloviter, McKee and Chagares. 

## PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 02-3158
KEVIN KENDRICK, Appellant v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA; THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA; NANCY BAILEY, SUPERINTENDENT OF FCI, FORT DIX
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. No. 00-cv-03561) District Judge: Honorable William H. Yohn, Jr.
Originally Argued January 13, 2004 Before: BECKER, ALITO, and CHERTOFF, Circuit Judges Resubmitted May 1, 2007 Before: SLOVITER, MCKEE, and CHAGARES, Circuit Judges *


## (Filed June 7, 2007)

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

## IT IS ORDERED that the slip opinion in the above case, filed June 7, 2007, be amended as follows: Page 1 of the caption, line 5 of the Appellees: NANCY BAILEY, SUPERINTENDENT OF FBI, FORT DIX should be deleted and replaced by: NANCY BAILEY, SUPERINTENDENT OF FCI, FORT DIX
By the Court, /s/ Dolores K. Sloviter Circuit Judge Dated: 11 June 2007
# C_2018117EN.01000301.xml

| 3.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 117/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 117/3

---

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006
   (1)
  )

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006

1

)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 117/03)

Decisions granting an authorisation

Decisions granting an authorisation

| Reference of the decision (2) | Date of decision | Substance name | Holder of the authorisation | Authorisation number | Authorised use | Date of expiry of review period | Reasons for the decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C(2018) 1676 | 23 March 2018 | Sodium dichromate
  EC No 234-190-3
  CAS No 7789-12-0 10588-01-9 | Jacobs Douwe Egberts DE GmbH, Weser Ems Str 1-3, 28309 Bremen, Germany | REACH/17/32/0 | Use of sodium dichromate as corrosion inhibitor in ammonia absorption deep cooling systems as applied in the industrial production of freeze-dried products such as coffee, herbs, spices and comparable products | 21 September 2029 | In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socioeconomic benefits outweigh the risk to human health arising from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies for the applicant before the sunset date |
| Dr Otto Suwelack Nachf. GmbH & Co.KG, Josef-Suwelack-Str., 48727 Billerbeck, Germany | REACH/17/32/1 |
| Européenne de Lyophilisation SA, Rue Cafea 1, 4460 Grace-Hollogne, Belgium | REACH/17/32/2 |

Reference of the decision (2)

2

Date of decision

Substance name

Holder of the authorisation

Authorisation number

Authorised use

Date of expiry of review period

Reasons for the decision

C(2018) 1676

23 March 2018

Sodium dichromate

EC No 234-190-3

CAS No 7789-12-0 10588-01-9

Jacobs Douwe Egberts DE GmbH, Weser Ems Str 1-3, 28309 Bremen, Germany

REACH/17/32/0

Use of sodium dichromate as corrosion inhibitor in ammonia absorption deep cooling systems as applied in the industrial production of freeze-dried products such as coffee, herbs, spices and comparable products

21 September 2029

In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socioeconomic benefits outweigh the risk to human health arising from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies for the applicant before the sunset date

Dr Otto Suwelack Nachf. GmbH & Co.KG, Josef-Suwelack-Str., 48727 Billerbeck, Germany

REACH/17/32/1

Européenne de Lyophilisation SA, Rue Cafea 1, 4460 Grace-Hollogne, Belgium

REACH/17/32/2

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

1

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/chemicals/reach/about/index_en.htm

2

---
Paul PIECZYNSKI, petitioner, v. WELLS FARGO AND COMPANY, N.A.

No. 18-8013.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 5, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50948

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE PILAR SOLARES-GONZALEZ

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:07-CR-291-ALL

Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Pilar Solares-Gonzalez

raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,

523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty

provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. PinedaArrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 2008 WL 59441 (Jan.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

January 30, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-50948

2

7, 2008) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
WAIVER WITH RESPECT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT 10-31-02



 


Exhibit 10.B




	 	 	 
	 	 	
Wachovia Bank, N.A.

Real Estate Financial Services

SC1098

16 Broad Street

Post Office Box 700

Charleston, SC 29401






			
		 	
WACHOVIA





December 17, 2003


Mr. Steven P. Birdwell 
Chief Financial Officer

Sea Pines Company, Inc. 
Post Office Box 7000

Hilton Head, SC 29938


RE:  Net Worth Covenant Waiver for Year Ended October 31, 2004


Dear Steve:


You have informed us that the Net Worth Ratio of the Company
is projected to be above the maximum level as of October 31, 2004, as required by Section 8.02(a) (i) of the Amended
and Restated Master Credit Agreement dated October 31, 2002.
This deficiency represents an “event of default” as that term
is used in the Agreement. The Bank hereby waives the
requirement that the Borrower maintain the Net Worth Ratio
specified by Section 8.02(a) (i) of the Agreement for the
fiscal year ending October 31, 2004.


The Lender hereby reserves all other rights and remedies it
may have against the Borrower under the Master Credit
Agreement. This waiver does not extend to any other covenant
contained in the Master Credit Agreement, and shall not be
deemed to be a waiver of, or acquiescence or consent of the
Lender to any other default now or hereafter under the Master
Credit Agreement.





Timothy
S. Blake 
Vice President 
Wachovia Bank, N.A.