alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018067EN.01000301.xml

| 22.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 67/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 67/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8486 — 3M Company/Scott Safety)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 67/04)

On 29 September 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8486. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8486. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Joseph CARTER, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA

No. 18-9080

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Danny Lee BANKS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5770

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Tammie MCCONICO, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5130

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 63 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 63

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
 United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Office of Personnel 
    Management relating to the treatment of Members of Congress and 
 congressional staff under section 1312 of the Patient Protection and 
                          Affordable Care Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 16, 2013

    Mr. McCaul introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
 referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to 
 the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
 United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Office of Personnel 
    Management relating to the treatment of Members of Congress and 
 congressional staff under section 1312 of the Patient Protection and 
                          Affordable Care Act.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves of 
the rule submitted by the Office of Personnel Management relating to 
the treatment, for purposes of qualifying for certain Federal Employees 
Health Benefits Program (chapter 89 of title 5, United States Code) 
benefits, of Members of Congress and congressional staff under section 
1312 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-
148) (78 Fed. Reg. 48337 (August 8, 2013)), and such rule shall have no 
force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August 15, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Dane R. Saglio                                         |
|-----------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  |   | Dane R. Saglio                                             |
|                  |   | Chief Financial Officer                               |
|                  |   | (principal financial officer and principal accounting |
|                  |   | officer)                                                   |

----
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 111 / Thursday, June 9, 2022 / Presidential Documents 35079 

Presidential Determination No. 2022–19 of June 6, 2022 

Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 303 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as Amended, on Transformers 

and Electric Power Grid Components 

Memorandum for the Secretary of Energy 

Ensuring a robust, resilient, and sustainable domestic industrial base to 

meet the requirements of the clean energy economy is essential to our 

national security, a resilient energy sector, and the preservation of domestic 

critical infrastructure. Therefore, by the authority vested in me as President 

by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including 

section 303 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (the ‘‘Act’’) 

(50 U.S.C. 4533), I hereby determine, pursuant to section 303(a)(5) of the 

Act, that: 

(1) transformers and electric power grid components are industrial resources, materials, or critical technology items essential to the national defense; 

(2) without Presidential action under section 303 of the Act, United States 

industry cannot reasonably be expected to provide the capability for the 

needed industrial resource, material, or critical technology item in a timely 

manner; and 

(3) purchases, purchase commitments, or other action pursuant to section 

303 of the Act are the most cost effective, expedient, and practical alternative 

method for meeting the need. 

Pursuant to section 303(a)(7)(B) of the Act, I find that action to expand 

the domestic production capability for transformers and electric power grid 

components is necessary to avert an industrial resource or critical technology 

item shortfall that would severely impair national defense capability. Therefore, I waive the requirements of section 303(a)(1)–(a)(6) of the Act for 

the purpose of expanding the domestic production capability for transformers 

and electric power grid components. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with FR_PREZDOC5
35080 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 111 / Thursday, June 9, 2022 / Presidential Documents 

You are authorized and directed to publish this determination in the Federal 

Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, June 6, 2022 

[FR Doc. 2022–12587 

Filed 6–8–22; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 6450–01–P 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with FR_PREZDOC5BIDEN.EPS</GPH>
Jesus C. HERNÁNDEZ, et al., Petitioners v. Jesus MESA, Jr.

No. 17-1678

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted.
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/15/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       71,497
COMMITMENTS
   1,558   12,574    2,552   67,313   56,191   71,423   71,317       74      180

CHANGES FROM 04/08/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      6,505)
     230      787       11    6,195    5,710    6,436    6,508       69       -3

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     2.2     17.6      3.6     94.1     78.6     99.9     99.7      0.1      0.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       34)
       5        6        6       16       19       23       29`

---

Updated April 18, 2014
David Charles SUSSMAN, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.

No. 19-5386

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District denied.
Gary Raymond HARVEY, et ux., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9679

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

*552Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, Petitioner v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION.

No. 18-1139

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 12, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
GERALD C. MANN AUR’ILIN 11. -,?EHonorable G. G. Roam 

County Attorney 

Fort Bend County 

Richmond, Texas 

Dear Sir8 Opinion No. O-4477 

Ren Construction of Subdivision (d) 

Section 3, Article 827a, Penal Code. 

We acknowledge receipt of your request for an opinion of this 

department on the following facts: 

"If a truck is hauling a load of long steel which protrudes more than 

twelve feet beyond the rear of said truck and in such case, for such 

trip, the operator of the truck nails two boards to the bed of the 

truck and lets them stiok out about twelm feet to the rear of the 

truck and then nails a board on the end of these two boards in order 

that the end of the steel roda would rest upon the same, and after 

delivering said steel at said destination, of ccurs~~ then removing 

the boards nailed on the rear of the truck bed. Does this constitute 

a violation of the law within the meaning of Article %27a, iSection 3, 

Subdivision (d) of our Penal Code?" 

Subdivision (d), Section 3, Article 827a, supra, reads as 

follows: 

"No train or combination of vehicles or vehicle operated alone shall 

carry any load extending more than three (3) feet beyond the front 

thereof, nor9 except as hereinbefore provided, more than four (4) feet 

beyond the rear thereof." 

The determining question is, what constitutes the "rear" of 

a truck. Section 1, Ar~ticle 10, Vernonss Texas Civil Statutes, provides 

as follows~ 

"The ordinary signification shall be applied to worda, except words of 

art or words connected with a particular trade or subject matter, tien 

they shall have the signification attached to them by experts in such 

art or trade, with reference to suoh subject matter." 
Honorable G. G. Roane, Page 2 (O-4477) 

In 39 Texas Jurisprudence, page 197, Section 105, it is said 

that one of the primary and settled rules of construction is that words in 

common use, when contained in a statute, will be read according to their natural, ordinary and popular meaning. 

Wabster's International Dictionary defines the term "rear" as 

being; "The back of anything, or the rear of a house; in the hindmost part; 

hindmost . . l n 

Applying the above rules and definition, we are of the opinion 

that the "reartl of the truck as used in the statute means the end of the bed 

of the truck and not any extension such as is described in your request. We 

do not believe it was the intention of the Legislature to permit an evasion 

of the law by the nailing of a board on to the bed of the truck and thereby 

extending the length thereof. To hold that such practice would not be a 

violation of said Article would render said law a useless thing. I%3 cannot 

presume that the Legislature did a useless thing. 

You are therefore advised that under the facts set forth in 

your request, such an operator would be violating subsection (d), Section 3, 

Article 827a, Penal Code. 

Yours very truly 

ATTORNEY GWERAL OF TEXAS 

By /s/Richard H. Cocke 

Richard H. 6ccke 

Assistant 

APPROVED M&R 18, 1942 

/s/ GROVER SELLERS 

FIRST ASSISTANT 

ATTORNEYGENERAL 

Approved 

Opinion Committee 

ByBWB 

Chairman
Exhibit 4.6



Exhibit 4.6



SPECIMEN OF COMMON STOCK CERTIFICATE



 


	
NUMBER


	
Flight Safety Technologies, Inc.



INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

50,000,000 SHARES COMMON STOCK AUTHORIZED, $.001 PAR VALUE


	
SHARES

	 	 	
CUSIP 33942T207

See Reverse for

Certain Definitions







This certifies that


 

is the owner of


FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF



Flight Safety Technologies, Inc.



transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed.  This

certificate and the shares represented hereby are subject to the laws of the State of Nevada, and to the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of

the Corporation, as now or hereafter amended.  This certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent.

WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the signature of its duly authorized officers.



Dated:



 

 

 


	
/s/ William B. Cotton

PRESIDENT
	
[SEAL]
	
/s/ David D. Cryer

SECRETARY







	
Countersigned:
	
Pacific Stock Transfer Company

500 E. Warm Springs Road, Suite 240

Las Vegas, Nevada  89119





By: /s/ Valerie Killius                            

     Authorized Signature













The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:



	
TEN COM

TEN ENT

JT TEN
	
- as tenants in common

- as tenants by the entireties

- as joint tenants with the right of

  survivorship and not as tenants in common


	
UNIF GIFT MIN ACT------------Custodian-------------

                        (Cust)            (Minor)



Act---------------------------------------------------------

(State)



	 	
Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.






For value received,                                                                     hereby sell, assign and transfer unto

PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER

IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE



	 
	


(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE)

	 
	


 

	
 

 

	 	
shares 

	
of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint, Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.


	
Dated
	 	 
	

 

X
	 
	

THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THIS CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT

ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER.  THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (Banks,

Stockbrokers, Savings and Loan Associations and Credit Unions)





 

SIGNATURE GUARANTEED:



 

 

 

TRANSFER FEE WILL APPLY
| 1.     | The Quarterly Report on Form 10Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and, |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |   |
| 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                     |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |   |

| By:    | /S/    | KEVIN KREISLERKEVIN KREISLERChief Executive Officer |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                |
| Date:  |   | November  22, 2010                        |

| By:    | /S/    | EDWARD R. CARROLLEDWARD R. CARROLLChief Financial and Accounting Officer |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                     |
| Date:  |   | November  22, 2010                                             |
**Exhibit 32.2**
 **CERTIFICATION
      OF PERIODIC REPORT**
 I,
      Darren L. Miles, Chief Financial Officer of Earth Biofuels, Inc. (the
“Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my
      knowledge:
 (1) the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the six months ended June
      30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
      (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or
      78o(d)); and
 (2) the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:
      November 20, 2007
 /s/
                Darren L. MilesDarren
                L. MilesChief
                Financial Officer
 A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT GLENN DAVID O’ NEAL, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. A. SOLIS; e t a l ., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 13-16832 D.C . No. 1:12-c v-01299-R RB M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for theEa ste rn Distric t of C a lifornia R a lph R . B e istline , C h ie f Judge , Pre siding * * Subm itte d Nove m

be r 18, 2014 * ** B e fore : LEAVY, FISHER , a nd N.R . SM ITH, C irc uit Judge s. C a lifornia sta te prisone r Gle nn Da

vid O’ Ne a l a

p pe a ls pro sefrom

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt dismi ssing his 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c t ion a lle g ing va rious 

# F IL ED DEC 08 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The Honora

ble R a lph R . B e istline , C hie f Unite d State s Distric t Judge for the Distric t of Ala ska , sitting by de signa t ion. *** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).c onstitutiona l c la im s. W e have jurisdic tion under 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie w de novo. Albino v . Bac a , 747 F.3d 1162, 1171 (9th C ir. 2014) (e n ba n c ) (le ga l rulings on e xha ustion of adm inistra

tive re m e die s); Re

snic k v . Hay e s , 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th C ir. 2000) (dismissa l unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1915A). W e a ffirm . The distric t c ourt prope rly c onc lude d tha

t O’ Ne a l fa ile d to e xha

ust his a dm inistra

tive re m e die s be c a

use the doc um e nts a

tta c he d to thec om

pla i nt showe d that O’ Ne a l ha d not e xha

uste d his grie va

nc e s for e a c h c a

use of a c tion be fore pre s e nting them

to thec ourt. Se eW

oodford v. N

go , 548 U.S. 81, 85, 93-95 (2006) (holding tha

t “prope r e xha

ustion”is m andatory

an d re quire s a dhe re nc e to a dm inistra

tive proc e dura l rule s); se ealso Durning v. First Boston C orp. , 815 F.2d 1265, 1267 (9th C ir. 1987) (c ourt m ay c onside r doc um e nts a

tta c he d to the c om pla i nt). The distric t c ourt did not a buse its disc re tion by

de ny i ng O’ Ne a l’ s m otion for re c onside ration be c a

use O’ Ne a l fa ile d to e sta

blish a ba sis for suc h re lie f. Se e Sc h. Dist. N

o. 1J , Multnomah C

nty . , Or. v . AC

andS, Inc . , 5 F.3d 1255, 1262-63 (9th C ir. 1993) (sta

n da rd of re vie w a

nd grounds for re c onside ration under Fe d. R . C iv. P. 59(e ) and 60(b)). B e c a use we a ffirm

on theba sis of O’ Ne a l ’ s fa ilure to e xha u st, wetre at the judgm e nt a s a

dismi ssa l without pre

judic e a s to a ll c la im s , a

n d do not addre ss 1 3 - 1 6 8 3 2 2O’ Ne a l’ s c o nte ntions c o nc e rning them e rits of his c la im s . Se eLira v . He rre ra , 427

F.3d 1164, 1170 (9th C ir. 2005) (“ [A] distric t c ourt m ust dismiss a

c a se without pre j udic e whe n

the re is no pre

suit e xha ustion.” (c ita

tion a nd inte rna l quota

tion m arks omitte d)). AFFIRM E D.

1 3 - 1 6 8 3 2 3