alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018428EN.01000501.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 27.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 428/5 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9189 — Cerberus Group/Marke Creative Merchandise)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 428/04)

1.

On 16 November 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018428EN.01000501-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | The Cerberus Group (USA, ‘Cerberus’), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Marke Creative Merchandise Ltd (USA, ‘Marke’), a subsidiary of Staples, Inc. |

Cerberus acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Marke.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Cerberus is a private investment firm which is active in diverse industries worldwide, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Marke is globally active in the provision of creative brand merchandising solutions in numerous industries including automotive, financial services, beverages, logistics, technology and retail. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018428EN.01000501-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9189 — Cerberus Group/Marke Creative Merchandise

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018428EN.01000501-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018428EN.01000501-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
Muhammad TOURE, Petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION.

No. 19-8287.

Supreme Court of the United States.

June 1, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Case 2:24-cv-00080-JRG Document 52-4 Filed 09/18/24 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 999
Case 2:24-cv-00080-JRG Document 52-4 Filed 09/18/24 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 1
Case 2:24-cv-00080-JRG Document 52-4 Filed 09/18/24 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 1001
Case 2:24-cv-00080-JRG Document 52-4 Filed 09/18/24 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 1
Alan L. DOERING, Petitioner, v. Wendy KELLEY, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, et al.

No. 18-9126

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
CITY OF ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI, et al., Petitioners, v. Mary R. MEIER.

No. 19-797.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q REPORT  OF  REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC.  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  (CHAPTER 63, TITLE 18 U.S.C.
SS.SS. 1350(a) AND (b))

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350(a) and (b)), the
undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
April 22, 2010

/s/ STEVEN J. JANUSEK Steven J. Janusek,
Chief Financial Officer


The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350(a) and (b)), is not
a part of the Form 10-Q to which it refers and is, to the extent permitted by law, provided by the above signatory to the extent of his knowledge.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/22/14          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      362,130
COMMITMENTS
 106,598  140,655   92,006  143,050  102,056  341,654  334,717   20,476   27,413

CHANGES FROM 04/15/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -6,757)
  10,302    8,413    4,744  -19,902  -20,090   -4,856   -6,933   -1,901      176

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    29.4     38.8     25.4     39.5     28.2     94.3     92.4      5.7      7.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      185)
      55       72       77       39       36      141      152
```

----

Updated April 25, 2014
# Official Journal C 188A/20 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 188A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5720 June 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 188A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5720 June 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2014/C 188A/1 | Recruitment Notice PE/179/S | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Parliament

2014/C 188A/1

Recruitment Notice PE/179/S

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2014/C 188A/2 | Review of ‘Competition’ C A Official Journals | 31 |

2014/C 188A/2

Review of ‘Competition’ C A Official Journals

31

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Joey LITTLE, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6018

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 21, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.9

               FISCAL YEAR 2004 BIOMEASUREMENT DIVISION BONUS PLAN
                      OF HUTCHINSON TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED

Hutchinson Technology Incorporated ("HTI") has a bonus plan that covers an
executive officer and certain other management-level employees of its
BioMeasurement Division. The decision to pay out bonuses is made annually by the
Compensation Committee of HTI's Board of Directors. The Committee's decision is
based primarily on the BioMeasurement Division's attainment of a number of
annual goals for the fiscal year, as well as other factors that may be
considered at the Committee's discretion. Bonuses are paid in cash in the first
quarter of the following fiscal year.

                                       29
Philip Hugh WENTZEL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5872

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

April 21, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00062

- CV

Steven STAMPS and Eva Stamps, Appellants

v.

Alva El ia RUIZ

, Appellee

From the 365th Judicial District Court, Dimmit County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12

- 08

- 11759

- DCVAJA Honorable Amado J. Abascal, III, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

After the court reported filed a notification of late reporter’s record, we ordered appellants to provide written proof to this court that the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the reporter’s fee. The appellants have now filed written proof that arrangements have been made to pay the reporter’s fee. We therefore ORDER the court reporter, Patricia Salinas, to file the reporter’s record on or before May 21, 2014

.

___________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 21st day of April, 2014

.

___________________________________ K eith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
239 F.2d 150

#### James A. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. R. J. McNEALY et al., A. C. Muldoon, Appellees.

No. 15206.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Nov. 9, 1956.

*510Ralph E. Hopper, Oakland, Cal., and James A. Williams, in pro. per., for appellant.

Robert J. McNealy, Harry O. Arend, Hubert A. Gilbert and Everett W. Hepp, Fairbanks, Alaska, for appellees.

Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, POPE, Circuit Judge, and HAMLIN, District Judge.

DENMAN, Chief Judge.

Williams appeals from a judgment of the District Court for the District of Alaska, Fourth Division, dismissing his complaint filed on February 4, 1956 in the above entitled action on the ground that the action was barred by the statute of limitations.

The complaint against McNealy and Muldoon charges:

(1) That McNealy (a) in June 1953 fraudulently obtained $500 from appellant upon a false allegation that he, McNealy, had obtained a valid liquor license for a certain night club; (b) on July 31, 1953 fraudulently obtained $250 from appellant on the false representation that he had caused a valid liquor license to be transferred to a certain address; and (c) on August 15, 1953 embezzled $250 which appellant had left in trust with McNealy.

(2) As to Muldoon, appellant alleges that on the 31st of July, 1953 Muldoon fraudulently obtained $250.00 from appellant by falsely representing that he had sold a liquor license for a certain location.

McNealy and Muldoon each moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the claims against each were torts *511barred by the Alaska statute of limitations, 3 A.C.L.A. 1949, § 55-2-7 as far as pertinent providing:

> “Within two years—

> “First. An action for libel, slander, assault, battery, seduction, false imprisonment or for any injury to the person or rights of another not arising on contract and not herein especially enumerated * *

The district court granted the motions and the complaints were dismissed.

Appellant, appearing below and here in propria persona, does not claim that the two year statute of limitations does not cover his claimed torts but contends that the statute was tolled by 3 A.C.L.A. 1949, § 55-2-15 which, so far as pertinent, provides:

> *“Exceptions as to persons under legal disability.*If any person entitled to bring an action mentioned in this article * * * be at the *time*the cause of action *accrued** * *.

> “Third. Imprisoned on a criminal charge, or in execution under sentence of a court for a term less than his natural life.

> “The time of such disability shall not be a part of the time limited for the commencement of the action * * *.”

The controlling words here are that the tolling begins only if the litigant be “Imprisoned on a criminal charge” “at the time the cause of action accrued.” Nowhere does the record in this case show that on or before August 15, 1953, the latest date of the alleged tortious acts was Williams imprisoned.

The claimed tolling statute not being applicable, the court did not err in dismissing the complaint..

The judgment is affirmed.
# C_2018302EN.01000101.xml

| 28.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 302/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 302/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8884 — Altor Funds/Trioplast Industrier)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 302/01)

On 1 June 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8884. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8884. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Anthony VIOLA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.

No. 19-6401

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018464EN.01001501.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 27.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 464/15 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9208 — WorleyParsons/Jacobs ECR)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 464/09)

1.

On 17 December 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018464EN.01001501-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | WorleyParsons Limited (‘WorleyParsons’, Australia), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | the Energy, Chemicals and Resources business division of Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (‘Jacobs ECR’, United States of America). |

WorleyParsons acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of Jacobs ECR.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares and assets.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for WorleyParsons: a global professional services provider, providing engineering consultancy services in the hydrocarbons, power, infrastructure, chemicals, minerals & metals and other sectors,

—   for Jacobs ECR: an engineering consultancy services provider, primarily in the energy, chemicals and resources sectors, providing a range of services to customers including engineering strategy and design, procurement, project and construction management, and operation and maintenance services.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018464EN.01001501-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9208 — WorleyParsons/Jacobs ECR

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018464EN.01001501-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018464EN.01001501-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
Independent Auditors' Report


To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Smith Barney Managed Governments Fund Inc.:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements
of the Smith Barney Managed Governments Fund Inc. (the Fund)
for the year ended July 31, 2001, we considered its internal
control, including control activities for safeguarding
securities, in order to determine our auditing procedures for the
purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and
to comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide
assurance on the internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles. Those controls include the safeguarding of
assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or
fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any
evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to
the risk that it may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in the internal control that might be
material weaknesses under standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness
is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of
the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively
low level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in
amounts that would be material in relation to the financial
statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a
timely period by employees in the normal course of performing
their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters involving
the internal control and its operation, including controls for
safeguarding securities that we consider to be material
weaknesses as defined above.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management, the Board of Directors of the Fund, and the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not intended to be and
should not be used by anyone other than the specified parties.



New York, New York
September 10, 2001
IA 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 44 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States regarding 

the right to vote. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2013 

Mr. POCAN (for himself, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. CLAY, Ms. EDWARDS, Mr. AL

GREEN of Texas, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Ms. LEE of 

California, Mr. MCGOVERN, and Ms. SCHAKOWSKY) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States regarding the right to vote. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States after the date of its submission for ratification: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 44 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Every citizen of the United States, who 

3 is of legal voting age, shall have the fundamental right 

4 to vote in any public election held in the jurisdiction in 

5 which the citizen resides. 

6 ‘‘SECTION 2. Congress shall have the power to en7 force and implement this article by appropriate legisla8 tion.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS