alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[ARTICLE] 6
[CIK] 0000856343
[NAME] SMITH BARNEY SMALL CAP BLEND FUND, INC. - CLASS L
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   YEAR
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1999
[PERIOD-END]                               DEC-31-1999
[INVESTMENTS-AT-COST]                      321,956,981
[INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE]                     340,189,430
[RECEIVABLES]                                6,689,672
[ASSETS-OTHER]                              35,539,295
[OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS]                                 0
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                             382,418,397
[PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES]                     2,332,458
[SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT]                              0
[OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES]                   36,392,923
[TOTAL-LIABILITIES]                         38,725,381
[SENIOR-EQUITY]                                      0
[PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON]                   309,621,865
[SHARES-COMMON-STOCK]                        1,055,294
[SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR]                          542,625
[ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT]                      382,804
[OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII]                               0
[ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS]                     14,518,898
[OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS]                             0
[ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC]                    19,169,449
[NET-ASSETS]                               343,693,016
[DIVIDEND-INCOME]                            3,274,890
[INTEREST-INCOME]                              839,790
[OTHER-INCOME]                                       0
[EXPENSES-NET]                               3,034,690
[NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME]                      1,079,990
[REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT]                    65,293,020
[APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT]                  (4,324,590)
[NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS]                       62,048,420
[EQUALIZATION]                                       0
[DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME]                            0
[DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS]                     1,561,774
[DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER]                                0
[NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD]                      1,056,665
[NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED]                    661,100
[SHARES-REINVESTED]                            117,104
[NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS]                      62,780,991
[ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR]                        (2,083)
[ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR]                 (13,047,321)
[OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR]                              0
[OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR]                           0
[GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES]                        2,240,238
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                   0
[GROSS-EXPENSE]                              3,034,690
[AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS]                        10,294,339
[PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN]                            13.09
[PER-SHARE-NII]                                 (0.08)
[PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC]                           2.58
[PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND]                              0.00
[PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS]                         1.68
[RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL]                              0.00
[PER-SHARE-NAV-END]                              13.91
[EXPENSE-RATIO]                                   2.01
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32





The undersigned, Jeffrey I. Friedman, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
and Lou Fatica, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Associated Estates Realty
Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.	The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March
31, 2005, which this certification accompanies, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Jeffrey I. Friedman

Jeffrey I. Friedman



/s/ Lou Fatica

Lou Fatica





May 3, 2005

Date

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Associated Estates
Realty Corporation and will be retained by Associated Estates Realty Corporation and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
----

Action brought on 24 March 2005 by Lootus Teine Osaühing against the Council of the European Union

(Case T-127/05)

(2005/C 115/67)

Language of the case: English

An action against the Council of the European Union was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 24 March 2005 by Lootus Teine Osaühing, established in Tartu (Estonia), represented by T. Sild and K. Martin, lawyers.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant is an Estonian fishing company which practises deep sea fishing in the area of the North East Atlantic Fisheries Convention. Estonia was a party to that Convention prior to its accession to the European Union. Article 6(9) of the Act of Accession of Estonia and the other new Member States to the European Union (3) provides that as from the date of accession, fisheries agreements concluded by the new Member States shall be managed by the Community and that the rights and obligations resulting for the new Member States from those agreements shall not be affected during the period in which the provisions of those agreements are provisionally maintained. It is in this context that the contested measures were issued, allocating Estonia fishing opportunities, measured in metric tons of allowable catch of certain stocks in 2004, 2005 and 2006.

According to the applicant these allocations constitute only a fraction of what Estonia legally harvested before accession. On this basis the applicant contends that the contested measures violated Article 6(9) of the Act of Accession as well as the principle of proportionality, and should therefore be annulled.

----

(1)OJ L 396, 31.12.2004, p. 1.

(2)OJ L 396, 31.12.2004, p. 4.

(3)OJ L 236, 23.09.2003.

----
Jose HERNANDEZ-MARTINEZ, et al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6663

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1116 

To require the approval of a majority of a public company’s shareholders 

for any expenditure by that company to influence public opinion on 

matters not related to the company’s products or services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2013 

Mr. GRAYSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To require the approval of a majority of a public company’s 

shareholders for any expenditure by that company to 

influence public opinion on matters not related to the 

company’s products or services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘End the Hijacking of 

5 Shareholder Funds Act’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1116 IH

1 SEC. 2. SHAREHOLDER APPROVAL FOR CERTAIN EXPENDI2 TURES. 

3 Any expenditure by a public company to influence 

4 public opinion on matters not related to the company’s 

5 products or services that has not been approved by a ma6 jority of the votes cast by shareholders to approve or dis7 approve such expenditure shall be considered a breach of 

8 a fiduciary duty of the officers and directors who author9 ized such an expenditure. The officers and directors who 

10 authorize such an expenditure without first obtaining such 

11 approval of shareholders shall be jointly and severally lia12 ble in any action brought in any court of competent juris13 diction to any shareholder or class of shareholders for the 

14 amount of such expenditure. 

15 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 

16 As used in this Act— 

17 (1) the term ‘‘public company’’ means any 

18 issuer that is required to submit periodical or other 

19 reports under section 13 of the Securities Exchange 

20 Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and 

21 (2) the term ‘‘shareholder’’ means any person 

22 who owns or holds a share of stock in a public com23 pany. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BCTC V Assignor Corp. (the "registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|               |  |                            
|-------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:          |  |                            
|March 10, 2005 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|               |  |                            
|               |  | Marc N. Teal               
|               |  | Principal Financial Officer
|               |  |                            
|               |  |                            

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Aziz MATEEN-EL, Petitioner v. W. Robert BELL, Judge, Superior Court of North Carolina, Mecklenburg County, et al.

No. 18-9182

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






| |                                                                                                                                                                    
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                                  
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Registrant.



| |     |                  
| | --- | -----------------
| | By: | /s/ Denise Barton

| |                                            
| | -------------------------------------------
| |                                            
| | Denise Barton                              
| | Chief Financial Officer of                 
| | Atlantic Coast Entertainment Holdings, Inc.
Sandra G. HALE, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 19-578

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
----

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the

(COM((2005) 190 final — 2005/0077(CNS) — 2005/0078(CNS) — 2005/0089(CNS) — 2005/0085(COD) — 2005/0086(COD) — 2005/0087(COD) — 2005/0088(COD) — 2005/0080(CNS) — 2005/0072(COD) — 2005/0073(COD) — 2005/0074(COD) — 2005/0075(COD) — 2005/0076(COD) — 2005/0081(COD) — 2005/0082(COD) — 2005/0083(COD))

(2006/C 65/23)

On 17 June 2005, the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 262 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the abovementioned proposals.

On 12 July 2005, the Committee Bureau instructed the Section for Employment, Social Affairs and Citizenship to prepare the Committee's work on the subject.

The European Economic and Social Committee appointed Ms Cser as rapporteur-general at its 422nd plenary session, held on 14 and 15 December 2005 (meeting of 15 December 2005) and adopted the following opinion by 93 votes with 2 abstentions.

1.   Summary of the proposal for a regulation

2.   General comments

3.   Specific comments

Brussels, 15 December 2005.

The President

of the European Economic and Social Committee

Anne-Marie SIGMUND

----
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1071 

To specify the size of the precious-metal blanks that will be used in the 

production of the National Baseball Hall of Fame commemorative coins. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 12, 2013 

Mr. HANNA (for himself, Mr. DOYLE, and Mr. GIBSON) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To specify the size of the precious-metal blanks that will 

be used in the production of the National Baseball Hall 

of Fame commemorative coins. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SIZE OF PRECIOUS-METAL BLANKS. 

4 Section 3(a) of the National Baseball Hall of Fame 

5 Commemorative Coin Act (Public Law 112–152) is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking ‘‘have’’ and 

8 inserting ‘‘be struck on a planchet having a’’; and 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1071 IH

1 (2) in paragraph (2)(B), by striking ‘‘have a’’ 

2 and inserting ‘‘be struck on a planchet having a’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
METRO-NORTH COMMUTER RAILROAD CO., Petitioner, v. Jamey MURPHY.

No. 19-733

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Connecticut denied.
Slip Op. 01- 26

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

____________________________________

:

HAGGAR APPAREL COMPANY, :

:

Plaintiff, :

:

v. : Before: MUSGRAVE, JUDGE

:

THE UNITED STATES, : Court No. 93-06-00343

:

Defendant. :

____________________________________:

JUDGMENT

In Haggar Apparel Co. v. United States, 20 CIT 842, 938 F. Supp. 868 (1996) (DiCarlo,

C.J.), the court entered judgment for the plaintiff, holding that it was entitled to a duty allowance on

the subject merchandise under TSUS 807.00 and HTSUS 9802.00.80. See 20 CIT at 851, 938 F.

Supp. at 875. That decision was affirmed by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. See

Haggar Apparel Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d 1460, 1462 (Fed. Cir. 1997). Subsequently the

Supreme Court vacated and remanded the Federal Circuit’s decision. See United States v. Haggar

Apparel Co., 526 U.S. 380, 395 (2000). On remand, the Federal Circuit held that

Customs’ determination that the pants at issue do not qualify for the partial exception

from duty allowed by HTSUS 9802.00.80 (and, in prior years, TSUS 807.00) must

be sustained. The Court of International Trade’s judgment to the contrary is

accordingly reversed, and the case is remanded with instructions to enter judgment

in favor of the United States.

Haggar Apparel Co. v. United States, 222 F.3d 1337, 1343-44 (Fed. Cir. 2000). Accordingly, it is

hereby 
Court No. 93-06-00343 Page 2

ORDERED that the court’s prior entry of judgment in favor of Haggar Apparel Company

is withdrawn, and it is further 

ORDERED that the United States Customs Service’s determination that the apparel at issue

does not qualify for the partial exception from duty allowed by TSUS 807.00 and HTSUS

9802.00.80 is sustained. 

 ______________________________________

R. KENTON MUSGRAVE, JUDGE

Date: March 5, 2001

New York, New York
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 83 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 83

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
      for an event to celebrate the birthday of King Kamehameha I.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2014

  Ms. Gabbard (for herself and Ms. Hanabusa) submitted the following 
  concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
      for an event to celebrate the birthday of King Kamehameha I.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR EVENT TO CELEBRATE BIRTHDAY OF 
              KING KAMEHAMEHA I.

    (a) Authorization.--Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
is authorized to be used for an event on June 8, 2014, to celebrate the 
birthday of King Kamehameha I.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
ceremony described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance 
with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect of the 
Capitol.
                                 <all>
```
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1105 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 9, 2013 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 to provide 

a registration exemption for private equity fund advisers, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1105 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Capital 

3 Access and Job Preservation Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REGISTRATION AND REPORTING EXEMPTIONS RE5 LATING TO PRIVATE EQUITY FUNDS ADVI6 SORS. 

7 Section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 

8 (15 U.S.C. 80b–3) is amended by adding at the end the 

9 following: 

10 ‘‘(o) EXEMPTION OF AND REPORTING REQUIRE11 MENTS BY PRIVATE EQUITY FUNDS ADVISORS.— 

12 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in this 

13 subsection, no investment adviser shall be subject to 

14 the registration or reporting requirements of this 

15 title with respect to the provision of investment ad16 vice relating to a private equity fund or funds, pro17 vided that each such fund has not borrowed and 

18 does not have outstanding a principal amount in ex19 cess of twice its invested capital commitments. 

20 ‘‘(2) MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS AND ACCESS

21 BY COMMISSION.—Not later than 6 months after the 

22 date of enactment of this subsection, the Commis23 sion shall issue final rules— 

24 ‘‘(A) to require investment advisers de25 scribed in paragraph (1) to maintain such 

26 records and provide to the Commission such anVerDate Mar 15 2010 01:03 Dec 10, 2013 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1105.RFS H1105

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 1105 RFS

1 nual or other reports as the Commission taking 

2 into account fund size, governance, investment 

3 strategy, risk, and other factors, as the Com4 mission determines necessary and appropriate 

5 in the public interest and for the protection of 

6 investors; and 

7 ‘‘(B) to define the term ‘private equity 

8 fund’ for purposes of this subsection.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 4, 

2013. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
'FEB 27 2915 ^?^

^ ^^^/£> Fl cy^
Brent Curtis SCHWERTZ, Petitioner, v. Richard JENNINGS, Warden.

No. 19-6495

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-05-00386-CV

Osteoimplant Technology, Inc., Appellant

v.

Herbert D. Huddleston, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 353RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. GN500743, HONORABLE MARGARET A. COOPER, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Osteoimplant Technology, Inc. has filed a motion to dismiss, stating that

it has decided not to pursue its appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. Tex. R.

App. P. 42.1(a).

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: August 26, 2005
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER****Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**     I, Denise Barton, Chief Financial Officer of Atlantic Coast Entertainment Holdings, Inc. (the“Registrant”), certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 of the Registrant (the “Report”): (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.     By: /s/ Denise Barton       Denise Barton          Chief Financial Officer of          Atlantic Coast Entertainment Holdings, Inc.       Date: November 9, 2007  
23
Roxanne TORRES, Petitioner v. Janice MADRID, et al.

No. 19-292

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit granted.