alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT10.76**

**COMMERCIALGUARANTY**

Reference is made to thatcertain Promissory Note dated as of March 31, 2006 (the “*Note*”)made by Earth Biofuels, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“*Maker*”),to the order of Southern Biofuels, LLC, a Mississippi limited liability company(“*Payee*”), in the principal amount of$1,100,000 (the “*Principal Amount*”).  Capitalized terms used but not otherwisedefined herein shall have the meanings prescribed to them in the Note.

THIS IS A “CONTINUINGGUARANTY” UNDER WHICH GUARANTEE THE FULL AND PUNCTUAL PAYMENT, PERFORMANCE ANDSATISFACTION OF ALL OF THE INDEBTEDNESS AND OBLIGATIONS INCURRED BY EARTHBIOFUELS WITH RESPECT TO THE NOTE.

The undersigned herebyguarantees the prompt payment of all amounts due under the Note.  The undersigned also guarantees the promptpayment of any interest that may accrue on the Note.

The undersigned waivesany requirement of notice of default or of any of the other matters referred toin this guaranty (this “*Guaranty*”),any requirement of diligence on the part of Payee or any holder of the Note,and all counterclaims, set-offs, abatements and defenses whatsoever against thePayee or any holder of the Note.

This Guaranty is in noway contingent upon any attempt to collect from the Maker or to enforce or proceedagainst any security or collateral given to secure the Note.

The validity andenforceability of this Guaranty shall be unaffected by any transfer, assignmentor endorsement of the Note, any indulgence or waiver granted with respect toany payment due thereunder or any remedy provided for therein or in anydocument referred to therein (including the release of any collateral) or anyother thing that might reduce or vary the risk of the Maker or operate as adischarge of the Maker as a matter of law.

This Guaranty shall beenforceable by any holder of the Note, and each such holder shall have the fullbenefit of this Guaranty without notice to the undersigned upon or afterendorsement.

The undersigned agrees topay upon demand all of Payee’s costs and expenses, including Payee’s attorneys’fees and Payee’s legal expenses, incurred in 

----

 

connection with the enforcement of this Guaranty. Ifthere is a lawsuit, Guarantor agrees upon Payee’s request to submit to thejurisdiction of the courts of Rankin County, State of Mississippi.

This Guaranty constitutesa guarantee of payment and collection.

This Guaranty shall notterminate until all the obligations under the Note have been fully andcompletely satisfied.

THIS GUARANTY SHALL BEGOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED AND INTERPRETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MISSISSIPPI, WITHOUT REGARD TO THE CONFLICTS OF LAWS PRINCIPLESTHEREOF.
| Dated: March 31, 2006 | /s/ Tommy W. Johnson |
|-----------------------|----------------------|
|                  | Tommy W. Johnson     |

 

 

----
10f-3 REPORT

SMITH BARNEY INCOME FUNDS
SMITH BARNEY DIVERSIFIED STRATEGIC INCOME FUND

" August 1, 2001 through October 31,2001"

	Trade				% of
Issuer	Date	Selling Dealer	Amount	Price	Issue (1)

Motorola Inc. Equity	10/26/01	J.P. Morgan Chase	$4,300   	$50.000	0.12	A
  Security Units
   7.000% due 11/16/04

Pennzoil-Quaker State	10/29/01	J.P. Morgan Chase	1,020,000	99.383	2.40	B
   10.000% due 11/1/08

Terra Cap. 	10/30/01	        CS First Boston	       3,455,000	99.430	10.00	c
   12.875% due 10/15/08

(1)  Represents purchases by all affiliated funds; may not exceed
       25% of the principal amount of the offering.

A-Includes purchases of $20,700 by other Smith Barney Mutual Funds.
B-Includes purchases of $4,980,000 by other Smith Barney Mutual Funds.
C-Includes purchases of $16,545,000 by other Smith Barney Mutual Funds.

10f-3 REPORT

SMITH BARNEY INCOME FUNDS
SMITH BARNEY DIVERSIFIED STRATEGIC INCOME FUND

November 1, 2001 through January 31,2002

	Trade				% of
Issuer	Date	Selling Dealer	Amount	Price	Issue (1)

Rite Aid Corp.	11/14/01	J.P. Morgan Chase	"$85,000"	$100.000	0.46	A
  4.750% due 12/1/06

Allied Waste North	11/15/01	J.P. Morgan Chase	 2,485,000 	 100.000 	2.00	B
 America 8.500% due 12/1/08

GAP Inc. 8.800% due 12/15/08	11/16/01	Goldman Sachs	 1,650,000	99.769	2.00	C

Revlon Consumer Products	11/19/01	Bear Stearns	 2,910,000	96.569	4.68	D
  12.000% due 12/1/05

Lyondell Chemical Co.	11/30/01	J.P. Morgan Chase	1,305,000	100.000	2.04	E
   9.500% due 12/15/08


(1)  Represents purchases by all affiliated funds; may not exceed
       25% of the principal amount of the offering.

A-Includes purchases of $825,000 by other Smith Barney Mutual Funds.
B-Includes purchases of $12,515,000 by other Smith Barney Mutual Funds.
C-Includes purchases of $8,350,000 by other Smith Barney Mutual Funds.
D-Includes purchases of $14,090,000 by other Smith Barney Mutual Funds.
E-Includes purchases of $6,695,000 by other Smith Barney Mutual Funds.
OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE SCHOOL, Petitioner, v. Agnes MORRISSEY-BERRU.

No. 19-267.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

The motion of Virginia, et al. for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument is denied. The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument is granted.
Darrell Tykwan ATKINSON, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6552

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
  In
connection with the quarterly report of PROLOR Biotech, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Abraham Havron, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
  /s/
      Abraham HavronAbraham
      HavronChief
      Executive OfficerPROLOR
      Biotech,
Inc.
 August
14, 2009
Independent Auditors' Report


To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
the Money Market Portfolio:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements
of the Money Market Portfolio (the Fund) for the year ended
December 31, 2002, we considered its internal control, including
control activities for safeguarding securities, in order to
determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing
our opinion on the financial statements and to comply with the
requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on internal
control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Those controls include the safeguarding of assets against
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, error or
fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any
evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to
the risk that it may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in internal control that might be material
weaknesses under standards established by the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness is a
condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the
internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low
level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in
amounts that would be material in relation to the financial
statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a
timely period by employees in the normal course of performing
their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters involving
internal control and its operation, including controls for
safeguarding securities, that we consider to be material
weaknesses as defined above as of December 31, 2002.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management and the Board of Trustees of the Fund and the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not intended to be and
should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.



                                             KPMG LLP
New York, New York
February 12, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000919557
<NAME> MFS TOTAL RETURN PORTFOLIO
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER> 10
   <NAME> TRAVELERS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                      609,638,540
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                     618,390,063
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,696,362
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                  52,032
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             624,138,457
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                     2,123,095
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                      447,619
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                          2,570,714
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                      0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                   559,271,116
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                       37,811,741
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                       38,345,904
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                   27,972,542
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                     25,548,534
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                     8,775,551
<NET-ASSETS>                               621,567,743
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                            9,293,909
<INTEREST-INCOME>                            3,652,203
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                               2,535,219
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                     10,410,893
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                   (6,818,710)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                    7,829,465
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                                0
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                            0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                      1,468,530
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                  2,002,693
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                                  0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                       (260,638)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                     17,561,649
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                   21,311,252
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                        2,438,475
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                              2,535,219
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                       612,636,948
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                            16.22
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                   0.28
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                         (0.06)
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                              0.00
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                         0.00
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                              0.00
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                              16.44
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                   0.83


</TABLE>
November 12, 1996


VIA EDGAR
Securities and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

	Attention:	Office of Applications and Reports Services

	Re: Smith Barney Concert Series (the "Fund")
		Nos.  33-64457 and 811-7435

Dear Sir/Madam:

	Pursuant to Rule 497(j) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, please 
accept this letter as certification that the prospectus and the statement of
additional information for the above-referenced Fund does not differ from 
that contained in Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the Fund's Registration 
Statement on Form N-1A. This Amendment was filed electronically on 
October 31, 1996.

	Any questions regarding this filing should be directed to the undersigned
at (212) 816-6392 or Mitchell O'Brien at (212) 816-6586.

	Please return an electronic transmittal as evidence of your receipt of this 
filing.

								Very truly yours,


								/s/Caren Cunningham
								Caren Cunningham
								Vice President and
								Associate General Counsel
Brandon M. HICKS, Petitioner v. Renee BAKER, Warden, et al.

No. 19-5053

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         65,926
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         1,482
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               1,032,366    
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0          
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    4,486,671    
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         4,160       
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           4,158       
<LOANS>                                        6,889,323    
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (105,000)   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 13,410,291   
<DEPOSITS>                                     11,693,152   
<SHORT-TERM>                                   0          
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            295,179     
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       551
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,417,909
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 13,410,291
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                435,636
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              300,980
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               736,616
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             402,954
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             404,685
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          331,931
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  (10,782)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             751
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                199,972
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                167,325
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     98,554
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   98,554
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  2.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  2.19
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 3.41
<LOANS-NON>                                    361,434
<LOANS-PAST>                                   0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               (105,500)
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  (12,391)
<RECOVERIES>                                   1,109
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              (105,000)
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           (105,000)
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0
        


</TABLE>
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 **ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Trust and ServicingAgreement dated as of November 10, 2017, by and among GS MORTGAGE SECURITIESCORPORATION II, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asServicer, COHEN FINANCIAL, A DIVISION OF SUNTRUST BANK, as Special Servicer,WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator andCustodian, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee and PARK BRIDGELENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor with respect to Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates Series 2017-WWP (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.7 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton,Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.      A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period fromJanuary 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicerhas fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all materialrespects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
___________

No. 95-3532

___________

Timothy H. Joeckel; Dawn L. *

Joeckel; Kenneth E. Thorne; *

Linda Secora; Frank Secore; *

Roy Nuttleman; Cecilia *

Nuttleman; Reynold J. Spulak; *

Gordon D. Whitten; Barbara A. *

Whitten; Marvin Eugene Simon; *

Frank Dahlstrom; Earle C. *

Baillie; Steve Tolstedt; Don *

Offenbacker; Marilyn A. *

Offenbacker; Leslie Cornwell; *

Cleve W. Stutzman; Arlene M. *

Stutzman; Edwin L. Johnson; *

Maxine M. Johnson; Laverne H. *

Meints; Chris L. Meints; *

James A. Davis, Jr.; Joan B. *

David; Lloyd Francis; Kenneth *

E. Schroeder; Norma L. * Appeal from the United States

Schroeder; James L. Gustafson;* District Court for the

Janis A. Gustafson; Edward J. * District of Nebraska.

Axmann; Donna J. Axmann; *

Wilfred Wagher; Charlie * [UNPUBLISHED]

Crofutt; Denise Crofutt; Ray *

E. Muhlbach; Louise M. Miller; *

Dale L. Mattley; Erlyn M. *

Mattley; Dorothy Bredthauer; *

Ted Daggett; Mona Daggett; *

Robert J. Jones; Robert E. *

Spurgeon; Barbara M. Spurgeon; *

Andrew M. Jaskiewicz; Larry S. *

Riederer; Orlan Meske; Ladonna *

Meske; Jeanne M. Thorne; *

William J. Fritz; Craig R. *

Ditzen, *

 *

Appellants, *

 *

v. *

 *

Internal Revenue Service, *

Collector; John Does, 1 *

through 10, *

 *

Appellees. *
 The Honorable Warren K. Urbom, United States District Judge 1

for the District of Nebraska.

 Appellants' motion to amend the caption is denied.

2

Appellees' motion for sanctions is also denied.

 ___________

 Submitted: July 1, 1996

 Filed: July 5, 1996

___________

Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Appellants are a group of Nebraska citizens who claim that they are

neither citizens nor residents of the United States and are thus not

required to pay federal income taxes, and assert that defendants have

wrongfully refused to recognize their status. The district court1

dismissed their action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We

conclude the judgment of the district court was correct and that an opinion

would lack precedential value. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Accordingly we affirm the district court's judgment.2

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
UNITED STATES, Petitioner v. Michael J.D. BRIGGS

No. 19-108

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 15, 2019

*520Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces granted. The case is consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.
Jordan COMBS, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6027

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 21, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Shanta G. PHILLIPS-BERRY, Petitioner v. KENNER POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al.

No. 19-5442

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

*401Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

SHANNTAYE EBONY HICKS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 15-10328

D.C. No. 2:13-cr-00190-MCE-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Morrison C. England, Jr., Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 3, 2016** 

Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.

Shanntaye Ebony Hicks appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges her guilty-plea convictions and 292-month concurrent sentences for two

counts of transportation of a minor, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2423(a). Pursuant

to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Hicks’s counsel has filed a brief

FILED

MAR 07 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as

counsel of record. We have provided Hicks the opportunity to file a pro se

supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been

filed. 

Hicks has waived the right to appeal her convictions and sentences. Because

the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver, we dismiss

Hicks’s appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir.

2009).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.

2