alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018270EN.01000701.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/7 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.8969 — FSN Capital V/Saferoad Holding)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 270/06)

1.

On 25 July 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018270EN.01000701-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | FSN Capital GP V Limited (‘FSN Capital V’, UK), belonging to the group FSN Capital (Norway), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Saferoad Holding ASA (‘Saferoad’, Norway). |

FSN Capital V will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Saferoad.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares and by way of public bid announced on 16 May 2018.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for FSN Capital V: a fund advised by FSN Capital Partners AS, a private equity investment firm headquartered in Oslo, Norway,

—   for Saferoad: a public limited liability company incorporated in Norway and the holding company of a group of companies that specialise in road safety and road infrastructure solutions in Northern, Central and Eastern Europe.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018270EN.01000701-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.8969 — FSN Capital V/Saferoad Holding

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018270EN.01000701-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018270EN.01000701-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
Roscoe CHAMBERS, Petitioner, v. Kris SCHMIDTS, et al.

No. 19-5324

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with this Quarterly Report of BTX Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Scott J. Silverman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| 1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006, fully complies with the |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 
| 2. | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of BTX Holdings, Inc. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

   
| Dated: May 19, 2006 |
|---------------------|

 

**BTX HOLDINGS, INC.**

 
| By: | */s/ Scott J. Silverman*Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
**Exhibit 31.1**

CERTIFICATION

I, Dennis G. McLaughlin, III, Chief Executive Officerof Earth Biofuels, Inc., certify that:

1.     I have reviewed thisQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Earth Biofuels, Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

4.     The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)    designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)    evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)    disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

a)    allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)    anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.
| Date:  November 20, 2006 |                          |   |
|-------------------------------|-------------------------------|--------|
|                          |                          |   |
|                               | /s/ Dennis G. McLaughlin, III |   |
|                          | Dennis G. McLaughlin, III     |   |
|                          | Chief Executive Officer       |   |

 

----
Mario Denane FULTZ, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6623

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 16, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES, Petitioner, v. Richard D. COLLINS.

No. 19-184

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Motion of petitioner to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.
Bachli Note of Extension of Term of Employment Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.9 
  
  
 NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TERM OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

  

			
	To:	  	Ronald W. Bachli
	From:	  	Board of Directors, First California Bancshares
	Date:	  	October 28, 2003

  
 This is to notify you
that First California Bancshares (the “Company”) hereby notifies you that the Company has exercised its right to extend the term of your employment through December 31, 2006, pursuant to paragraph 1 of the Employment Agreement between you
and Company, dated January 1, 2003. 
  

			
	 “COMPANY”
 FIRST
CALIFORNIA BANCSHARES

		
	 By
	 	/s/    ROBERT J. KUSHNER        
	 	 	

	 	 	 Robert J. Kushner,
 Chairman of the Compensation Committee
 of the Board of Directors



  


					
	 	 	 	 	Execution Copy
February 25, 1997


Securities and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington DC 20549

RE: Smith Barney Natural Resources Fund Inc. (the "Fund")
File Nos. 33-7339 and 811-4757

Gentlemen:

Pursuant to 497(j) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, please accept
this letter as certification that the prospectus and statement of additional
information of the Fund do not differ from those contained in Post-Effective
Amendment No.21 (the "Amendment") to the Fund's Registration Statement
on Form N-1A.  This Amendment was filed electronically on February 20, 1997
as Accession Number 91155-97-84 and became effective immediately.

Any comments on this filing should be directed to the undersigned at
(212) 816-6392.  Please return an electronic transmittal as evicence of your
receipt of this filing.

Very truly yours,


/s/ Caren Cunningham
Caren Cunningham
Assistant Secretary
Jose Luis TAPIA-FIERRO, Petitioner v. William P. BARR, Attorney General, et al.

No. 19-6438

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 16, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 4.15

THIRD
AMENDMENT TO THE

FIRSTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

               This
Third Amendment to the Firstwave Technologies, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase
Plan (the “Amendment”) is made as of the 14th day of May 2001, by
Firstwave Technologies, Inc., a Georgia corporation (the “Company”).


WITNESSETH:

               WHEREAS,
the Company established the Firstwave Technologies, Inc.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan effective December 30, 1994 and amended such plan
May 12, 1998 and June 30, 1998 (the “Plan”);

               WHEREAS,
Paragraph 16 of the Plan requires the Board of Directors of
the Company to submit for approval to the shareholders any amendment that would
increase the number of shares authorized by the Plan; and

               WHEREAS,
the Board of Directors has authorized and directed, subject
to such shareholder approval, to increase by 20,000 the total number of Shares
which may be granted or awarded under the Plan.

               NOW,
THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the foregoing
premises, and other good and valuable consideration, the Plan is amended as
follows:

	
   
  	
  3.
  	
  By deleting the second sentence of the first
  paragraph of Paragraph 11 and substituting the following:
  
	
   
  	
   
  	
   
  
	
   
  	
   
  	
  “The maximum number of shares made available for
  sale under the Plan shall be ninety thousand (90,000) shares, subject to
  adjustment upon changes in capitalization of the Company as provided in
  Paragraph 15 below.”
  
	
   
  	
   
  	
   
  
	
   
  	
  4.
  	
  This Amendment shall be effective as of the date set
  forth above.  Except as hereby
  amended, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
  
	
   
  	
   
  
	
   
  	
  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
  undersigned does hereby execute this Amendment as of the date set forth above.
  





	
   
  	
   
  	
  FIRSTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
  
	
   
  	
   
  	
   
  
	
   
  	
   
  	
  By:
  	
   
  	
  /s/ Richard T. Brock
  	
   
  
	
   
  	
   
  	
   
  	
  



  	
  



  	
   
  
	
   
  	
   
  	
   
  	
  Richard T. Brock, President and

  Chief Executive Officer
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION

SIGNODE INDUSTRIAL GROUP LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAMUEL, SON & CO. LTD. and SAMUEL, 

SON & CO. (USA) INC. d/b/a SAMUEL 

PACKAGING SYSTEMS GROUP and 

SAMUEL STRAPPING SYSTEMS,

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 2:24-cv-00080-JRG

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

Notice is hereby given that Pavan K. Agarwal of Foley & Lardner LLP enters his

appearance on behalf of Defendants Samuel, Son & Co. Ltd. and Samuel, Son & Co. (USA) Inc. 

d/b/a Samuel Packaging Systems Group and Samuel Strapping Systems in this matter.

Pavan K. Agarwal may receive all communications from the Court and from other parties 

at Foley & Lardner LLP, Washington Harbor, 3000 K Street, N.W., Suite 600, Washington, D.C. 

20007, Telephone: (202) 945-6162; Facsimile: (202) 672-5399; email pagarwal@foley.com.

Case 2:24-cv-00080-JRG Document 16 Filed 05/13/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 113
2

Dated: May 13, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Pavan K. Agarwal

Pavan K. Agarwal

D.C. Bar No. 459614

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP

Washington Harbor, 3000 K Street, N.W., 

Suite 600

Washington, D.C. 20007

Telephone: (202) 945-6162

Facsimile: (202) 672-5399

Email: pagarwal@foley.com

Attorney for Defendants 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that counsel of record who are deemed to have consented 

to electronic services are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF 

system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on this the 13th day of May 2024.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Pavan K. Agarwal

Pavan K. Agarwal

D.C. Bar No. 459614

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP

Washington Harbor, 3000 K Street, N.W., 

Suite 600

Washington, D.C. 20007

Telephone: (202) 945-6162

Facsimile: (202) 672-5399

Email: pagarwal@foley.com

Attorney for Defendants 

Case 2:24-cv-00080-JRG Document 16 Filed 05/13/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 114
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lone Mountain Mines, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Kevin Murphy, President/CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/ Kevin Murphy Kevin M. Murphy, President, Secretary, CEO Dated:  August 19, 2008
INTERIOR GLASS SYSTEMS, INC., Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-576

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Joseph Frank ROWE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9432

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

May 31, 2017 CCO

- 087

No. 17

- 1184 & 17

- 1363

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

GEORGE J. PODLUCKY

,

Appellant

(W .D. Pa. No s

. 2

- 09

- cr

- 00278

- 001

, 2

- 09

- cr

- 00279

- 001

, 2

- 11

- cr

- 00037

- 001 )

Present: SHWARTZ, NYGAARD and FISHER

, Circuit Judges

1. “Notice to the Court” treated as a Motion filed by Appellant for reconsideration.

2. Motion by Appellant in 17

- 1363 to stay case.

Respectfully, Clerk/ tyw

____________________ _____________ORDER________________________________ Appellant’s “Notice To The Court

, ” which has been treated as a motion for reconsideration, is granted to this extent: the N ot P recedential O pinions and J udgments fil ed on the docket on May 16, 2017 are vacated. In addition, because appellant’s summary action response relating to C.A. No. 17

- 1184 is dated May 15, 2017, the Court will consider it. Revised opinions will be issued. Despite the arguments raised in appel lant’s response to summary action, the reissued opinions and judgments will reflect that t he appeal docketed at C.A. No. 17

- 1184 (D.C. Crim. Nos. 11

- cr

- 00037

, 09

- cr

0027 9

, & 09

- cr

- 0027 8) summarily affirm s the District Court’s order entered on January 13 , 2 0 17 denying appellant’s mo tion to withdraw the plea; and that t he appeal docketed at C.A. No. 17

- 1363 (D.C. Crim. No. 09

- cr

- 00279) summarily affirm s the District Court’s January 20, 2017 order denying appellant’s motion to release the lien. Appellant’s ar guments on the merits in his summary action response cannot be addressed because the District Court lacked jurisdiction to consider his criminal Rule 11 motion.Summary affirmance of the District Court’s order entered on 1/13/17 denying the motion

to with draw the plea was and remains appropriate. Appellant’s motion to stay the appeal in C.A. No. 17

- 1363 is denied.

By the Court,

s/ Richard L. Nygaard Circuit Judge

Dated: June 7, 2017
William A. SALZWEDEL, Petitioner v. CALIFORNIA, et al.

No. 19-552

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 4.16

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

                                       OF

                            GOLDMAN SACHS CAPITAL IV

      This Certificate of Trust of Goldman Sachs Capital IV (the "Trust"), dated
as of January 20, 2004, is being duly executed and filed by the undersigned, as
trustees, to form a statutory trust under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12
Del. C. Section 3801, et seq.)(the "Act").

      1. Name. The name of the statutory trust being formed hereby is Goldman
Sachs Capital IV.

      2. Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of the
Trust, with a principal place of business in the State of Delaware, are The Bank
of New York (Delaware), White Clay Center, Route 273, Newark, Delaware 19711.

      3. Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective as of its
filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate of
Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a)(1) of the Act as of the date first
above written.

                                   THE BANK OF NEW YORK (DELAWARE), not in its
                                   individual capacity, but solely as trustee


                                   By: /s/ William T. Lewis
                                       ______________________________
                                       Name:  William T. Lewis
                                       Title: Sr. Vice President
Richard Lewis KATZIN, et al., Petitioners v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-258

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 21, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1058 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1058

           To suspend temporarily the duty on Acid Black 194.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2013

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To suspend temporarily the duty on Acid Black 194.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACID BLACK 194.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Acid Black 194      Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          (CAS No. 57693-14-                                                12/31/2016
                          8) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          3204.12.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Paul E. NUNU, Petitioner, v. Nancy Nunu RISK, et al.; Joseph's/Candler Health System, Inc.

No. 19-713.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

The petition for rehearing is denied.
Luis Felipe VALENCIA, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 18-9263

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Steven Talbert WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.

No. 19-6565

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1028 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1028

 To ensure that any authority of the Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund to 
borrow amounts from the Treasury is used only to pay mortgage insurance 
                                claims.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2013

 Mr. Capuano introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To ensure that any authority of the Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund to 
borrow amounts from the Treasury is used only to pay mortgage insurance 
                                claims.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``End Unnecessary Borrowing Act of 
2013''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON USE OF BORROWING AUTHORITY.

    Paragraph (2) of section 205(f) of the National Housing Act (12 
U.S.C. 1711(f)(2)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(A)'' after ``(2)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:
            ``(B) Subparagraph (A) may not be construed to authorize or 
        require the Secretary to borrow any amounts to comply with the 
        capital ratio requirement under such subparagraph.
            ``(C) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any 
        authority of the Secretary under this Act or otherwise to 
        borrow amounts from the Treasury of the United States for the 
        Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund may be used only to the extent 
        necessary to pay claims on mortgage insurance that is an 
        obligation of such Fund.''.
                                 <all>
```