alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Robert J. Benkowski, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of MicroMed Cardiovascular, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2007



By:

/s/ Robert J. BenkowskiRobert J. BenkowskiChief Executive Officer
Independent Auditors' Consent



To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Smith Barney World Funds, Inc. - International Balanced Portfolio
and International Equity Portfolio:

We consent to the incorporation by reference, of our report dated
December 15, 1999 with respect to the Smith Barney World Funds,
Inc. - International Balanced Portfolio and International Equity
Portfolio, and to the references to our firm under the heading
"Independent Auditors" in the Statement of Additional Information
included in this Registration Statement on Form N-14.

	KPMG
LLP


New York, New York
February 10, 2000
Curtis STOKES, Petitioner, v. INDIANA.

No. 19-8353.

Supreme Court of the United States.

June 1, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Indiana denied.
Kevin BATTLE, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6601

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 16, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# Official Journal C 373/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 373 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 634 November 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 373

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 634 November 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COURT OF AUDITORS |
| 2020/C 373/01 | Opinion No 8/2020 (pursuant to Articles 287(4) and 322(1)(a), TFEU) on the Commission’s 2020/0100 (COD) proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and Council on the public sector loan facility under the Just Transition Mechanism (COM(2020) 453 final) | 1 |

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COURT OF AUDITORS

2020/C 373/01

Opinion No 8/2020 (pursuant to Articles 287(4) and 322(1)(a), TFEU) on the Commission’s 2020/0100 (COD) proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and Council on the public sector loan facility under the Just Transition Mechanism (COM(2020) 453 final)

(pursuant to Articles 287(4) and 322(1)(a), TFEU)

(COM(2020) 453 final)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

'

'

versus ' NO. 1:24-CR-14

'

JERRY LEONARD CARNLEY, JR., '

'

'

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Hawthorn conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed 

by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued his Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. The magistrate 

judge recommended that the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. He further 

recommended that the court adjudge the Defendant guilty on Count Eight of the Indictment

filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to the magistrate judge’s findings. The court ORDERS 

that the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate 

Judge are ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the 

plea agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Jerry Leonard Carnley, Jr., is 

Case 1:24-cr-00014-MAC-ZJH Document 32 Filed 08/01/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 117
2

adjudged guilty as to Count Eight of the Indictment charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 -

Wire Fraud.

.

 ________________________________________

 MARCIA A. CRONE

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 7th day of September, 2004. SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 1st day of August, 2024.

Case 1:24-cr-00014-MAC-ZJH Document 32 Filed 08/01/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 118
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00070

- CR

Rory Jones

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 211th District Court

o f Denton County (F

- 2014

- 0081

- C )

November 20, 2014

Opinion by Justice Walker

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

__ /s/ Sue Walker

___________________ Justice Sue Walker
Exhibit 32.1



                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of Atomic
Paintball,  Inc.  for the quarter  ended March 31,  2010,  I, Don Mark  Dominey,
Principal  Executive and Accounting  Officer of Atomic  Paintball,  Inc., hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

     a)   such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Atomic  Paintball,  Inc. for the
          quarter ended March 31, 2010,  fully complies with the requirements of
          section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     b)   the  information  contained in such  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of
          Atomic  Paintball,  Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2010,  fairly
          presents,  in all  material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and
          results of operations of Atomic Paintball, Inc.


Date: May 17, 2010


                                          /s/ Don Mark Dominey
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Don Mark Dominey, Chief Executive
                                          Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                                          (Principal Executive and Accounting
                                          Officer)

This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atomic Paintball, Inc. on Form 10-Q/A
for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission  on the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  David J.  Cutler,  Chief
Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: August 7, 2008




By:      /s/ David J. Cutler
         ----------------------------------
         David J. Cutler
         Chief Executive Officer, principal financial officer
Christopher Isaac SIMMONS, Petitioner, v. GRISSOM, et al.

No. 19-5584

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Marcus TURNER, Sr., et al., Petitioners v. Alva C. HINES, et al.

No. 19-158

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.
Abdul King GARBA, et al., Petitioners v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6478

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 47 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 47

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States giving 
Congress power to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the 
                             United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 22, 2013

  Mr. Bachus (for himself and Mr. Lipinski) introduced the following 
 joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States giving 
Congress power to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the 
                             United States.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``The Congress shall have power to prohibit the physical 
desecration of the flag of the United States.''.
                                 <all>
```
```
 
 
WHEAT-HRSpring - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                          Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/03/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       71,909
COMMITMENTS
  24,213    4,798    3,725   29,302   47,839   57,240   56,362   14,669   15,547

CHANGES FROM 05/27/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -309)
   1,169      317      727   -3,095   -2,225   -1,199   -1,181      890      872

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    33.7      6.7      5.2     40.7     66.5     79.6     78.4     20.4     21.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      100)
      32       10       15       44       37       84       58
```

----

Updated June 6, 2014
Order entered October 10 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 12 - 01621 - CR No. 05 - 12 - 01622 - CR JOSHUA PULLIAM - ROBERTS, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dalla s County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F12 - 34121 - J , F12 - 34219 - J



### O RDER In his brief, appellant raises issues related to the costs assessed against him. The records, however, do not contain cost bills or other documents with itemized lists of costs assess ed in the

cases. Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, supplemental clerk’s records containing detailed itemizations of the costs assessed in the cases, including but not limited to, specific court costs, fees, and court appointed attorney fees. In accordance with Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 103.001, the cost bill s shall be signed by the officer who charged the cost s or the officer who is entitled to receive payment for t he cost s . We further ORDER that the supplemental clerk’s records includedocuments explaining any and all abbreviations used to designate a particular fee, cost, or court

appointed attorney fee. We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electro nic transmission, to Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 02/11/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       46,717
COMMITMENTS
   3,107    4,785    2,822   40,748   39,070   46,677   46,677       40       40

CHANGES FROM 02/04/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      8,701)
     602      891     -116    8,195    7,986    8,681    8,761       20      -60

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     6.7     10.2      6.0     87.2     83.6     99.9     99.9      0.1      0.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       42)
       6        5        6       21       23       30       32`

---

Updated February 14, 2014
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018278EN.01000801.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 8.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/8 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.8912 — Carlyle/The specialty chemicals business of Akzo Nobel)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 278/05)

1.

On 1 August 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018278EN.01000801-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | the Carlyle Group (USA), (‘Carlyle’), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | the specialty chemicals business of Akzo Nobel (Netherlands) (‘Akzo Nobel SC’). |

Carlyle acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of Akzo Nobel SC.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   Carlyle: a global alternative asset manager,

—   Akzo Nobel SC: the specialty chemicals business of Akzo Nobel, which produces a range of chemicals.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018278EN.01000801-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.8912 — Carlyle/The specialty chemicals business of Akzo Nobel

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018278EN.01000801-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018278EN.01000801-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.5

                          Generation Capital Associates
                              1085 Riverside Trace
                                Atlanta, GA 30328
                        Tel 404/303-8450 Fax 404/255-2218

Via Fax: 803-736-7735

January 13, 2004

Mr. George E. Mendenhall
CEO
Integrated Business Systems and Services, Inc.
1601 Shop Road - Suite E
Columbia, SC 29201

Re: December 24, 2003 Securities Purchase Agreement

Dear George:

This is to confirm that we have agreed that the Closing Date as defined in
Section 10 (c) of the above referenced purchase agreement is January 6, 2004.
Accordingly, the 30-day period to file the GCA Registration Statement, and the
120-day period for the GCA Registration Statement to become effective, are
February 5, 2004 and May 5th , 2004, respectively.

Sicnerely,

/s/ David A. Rapaport
-------------------------
David. A. Rapaport
Executive Vice President
And General Counsel

cc: Steven Scott
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 05/13/14          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      419,669
COMMITMENTS
 111,532  194,218   84,631  195,070  111,127  391,233  389,976   28,436   29,693

CHANGES FROM 05/06/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     27,821)
   7,280   26,500    1,138   24,794    6,013   33,212   33,651   -5,391   -5,830

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    26.6     46.3     20.2     46.5     26.5     93.2     92.9      6.8      7.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      195)
      58       80       81       41       38      147      161
```

----

Updated May 16, 2014
Allen E. PEITHMAN, Jr., et al. v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-16

Supreme Court of the United States.

Decided November 18, 2019

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Justice SOTOMAYOR, dissenting from denial of certiorari.

In *Honeycutt* *v.* *United States* , 581 U. S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 1626, 198 L.Ed.2d 73 (2017), this Court held that joint-and-several liability is not permitted under 98 Stat. 2045, 21 U.S.C. § 853(a)(1), which mandates forfeiture of "property constituting, or derived from, any proceeds the person obtained, directly or indirectly, as the result of " certain drug crimes. 581 U. S., at ----, 137 S.Ct., at 1630. The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has since held that the reasoning of *Honeycutt* "appl[ies] with equal force" to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C), which is worded almost identically to 21 U.S.C. § 853(a)(1). *United States v. Gjeli* , 867 F.3d 418, 428 (2017).

In this case, the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit reached a contrary conclusion. 917 F.3d 635, 652-653 (2019). It upheld a joint-and-several forfeiture order against petitioners under § 981(a)(1)(C), reasoning that *Honeycutt* does not apply to that provision. See 917 F.3d at 652-653. The Government now concedes error. According to the Government, there is no "distinguishing 18 U.S.C. 981 from 21 U.S.C. 853 for purposes of joint and several liability." Brief in Opposition 6; see also *id.,* at 10 ("[T]he government has agreed that *Honeycutt* 's reasoning applies to Section 981(a)(1)(C)"). Nevertheless, the Government maintains that there is an independent ground for the imposition of joint-and-several liability under § 981(a)(1)(C). See *id.,* at 6-9. The Eighth Circuit, however, never addressed that proffered alternative ground for affirmance.

Because the Government now concedes that the rationale of *Honeycutt* applies equally to § 981(a)(1)(C) as it does to § 853(a)(1), I would grant the petition for certiorari, vacate the judgment below, and remand the case to allow the Eighth Circuit to reconsider its decision in light of the Government's concession.