alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.2D

                               EXTENSION AGREEMENT

EXTENSION AGREEMENT entered into as of the thirtieth day of December 2003 by and
between Alicomp, a division of Alicare Inc, (Alicomp) with offices located at
730 Broadway, N.Y. 10003 and Infocrossing Inc. (IFOX) (formerly known as
Computer Outsourcing Services Inc.) with offices located at 2 Christie Heights,
Leonia N.J. 07605.

WHEREAS the parties entered in an agreement dated March 21, 1997, (effective
October 1, 1997) (the Service Agreement) pursuant to which IFOX provides certain
computer related services to Alicomp and a Marketing Agreement dated March 21,
1997 (the Marketing Agreement) pursuant to which the parties share resources and
clients (collectively the Service Agreement and the Marketing Agreement are
referred to herein as the March 21, 1997 Agreement); and,

WHEREAS the term of the October 1, 2002 Extension Agreement expires on
September 30, 2003; and

WHEREAS Alicomp and IFOX have begun negotiations with respect to the terms and
conditions of a new Service Agreement and a new Marketing Agreement but such
negotiations have not yet been completed; and

WHEREAS Alicomp desires to continue receiving services and benefits of the
March 21, 1997 Agreement from IFOX during the course of the negotiations; and

WHEREAS IFOX desires to continue to provide the services and benefits of the
March 21, 1997 Agreement during the course of the negotiations;

NOW THEREFORE, in exchange for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties have agreed as
follows:

1.  IFOX shall continue to provide Alicomp with all of the services set forth in
    the March 21, 1997 Agreement upon the same terms and conditions as set forth
    in the March 21, 1997 Agreement.
2.  All of the terms of the March 21, 1997 Agreement, including but not limited
    to fee schedules and payment terms, shall remain in full force and effect,
    as if set forth at length herein, except that the parties have agreed to
    further negotiate certain terms of the March 21, 1997 Agreement.
3.  The term of the March 21, 1997 Agreement shall be extended from October 1,
    2003 until September 30, 2006 and shall thereafter automatically renew
    itself for successive thirty day periods unless one party gives the other
    written notice thirty days prior to the date that extended March 21, 1997
    Agreement would otherwise expire that the party does not wish to extend the
    term, in which event the extended March 21, 1997 Agreement shall terminate
    without further renewal.

/s/ Robert B. Wallach                              /s/ Arthur Kurek
--------------------------------                   ----------------------------
Infocrossing, Inc                                  Alicomp
By: Robert B. Wallach, President                   By: Arthur Kurek, President
Humberto HERRERA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8002.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# C_2017063EN.01000801.xml

| 27.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/8

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 November 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Piemonte — Italy) — MB Srl v Società Metropolitana Acque Torino (SMAT) SpA

(Case C-697/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Public contracts - Directive 2004/18/EC - Directive 2014/24/EU - Participation in a call for tenders - Tenderer having omitted to mention in the tender the undertaking’s charges in relation to safety and security at work - That obligation created by case-law - Exclusion from the tendering procedure without the possibility of remedying that omission))

(2017/C 063/12)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Piemonte

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: MB Srl

Applicant:

Defendant: Società Metropolitana Acque Torino (SMAT) SpA

Defendant:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The principle of equal treatment and the obligation of transparency, as implemented by Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts, must be interpreted as meaning that they preclude the exclusion of a tenderer from a tendering procedure for a public works contract following that tenderer’s failure to comply with the obligation to indicate separately in the tender the undertaking’s charges in relation to safety and security at work — the failure to comply with which carries the penalty of exclusion from the procedure — which is not set out expressly in the tender documents or the national rules, but is based on an interpretation of those rules and the filling in of the gaps in those documents carried out by the national court ruling at final instance. The principles of equal treatment and proportionality must also be interpreted as meaning that they do not preclude the possibility of granting that tenderer an opportunity to remedy the situation and to satisfy that obligation within a period prescribed by the contracting authority.

---

(1)  OJ C 106, 21.3.2016.

1

---
John GIVENS, Petitioner v. ILLINOIS.

No. 18-9761

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
# Official Journal L 93/3 Ap

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 93 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 503 April 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 93

English edition

Legislation

Volume 503 April 2007

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | RULES OF PROCEDURE |
| | * | Codified version of the EESC Rules of Procedure (in force on 24 October 2006) | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

RULES OF PROCEDURE

*

Codified version of the EESC Rules of Procedure (in force on 24 October 2006)

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# Official Journal L 73/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 73 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 657 March 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 73

English edition

Legislation

Volume 657 March 2022

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/379 of 28 February 2022 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Zagorski bagremov med’ (PDO)) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/379 of 28 February 2022 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Zagorski bagremov med’ (PDO))

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1143 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1143

To amend title 18, United States Code, to require the Bureau of Prisons 
  to provide secure storage areas on institution grounds outside the 
     secure perimeter for employees authorized to carry a firearm.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 13, 2013

 Mr. Stockman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to require the Bureau of Prisons 
  to provide secure storage areas on institution grounds outside the 
     secure perimeter for employees authorized to carry a firearm.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Correctional Workers Safety 
Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

            (1) The Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act, enacted in 
        2004 and later amended by the Law Enforcement Officers Safety 
        Act Improvements Act of 2010, gives law enforcement officers, 
        including Bureau of Prisons (BOP) employees, the right to carry 
        a concealed firearm in all fifty States for self-protection.
            (2) The intent of the law is to allow law enforcement 
        officers to protect themselves while off duty.
            (3) Correctional workers in the BOP have been the targets 
        of assaults and murders while off duty.
            (4) While this law allows officers to protect themselves 
        off duty, the BOP does not allow staff to carry their personal 
        weapon on the grounds of most facilities when commuting to and 
        from work.
            (5) The BOP allows carry to and from work and storage at 
        approximately 15 facilities in the BOP, but they do not 
        reasonably explain why they allow some BOP staff to carry on 
        BOP property while others are not allowed.

SEC. 3. SECURE FIREARMS STORAGE IN PRISON.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 303 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 4049. Secure firearms storage in prison
    ``The Director of the Bureau of Prisons shall ensure that each 
prison facility provides a secure firearms storage area for use by all 
persons employed by the Bureau at the facility who are authorized to 
carry a firearm, or allow employees authorized to carry a firearm to 
store their firearm in a Bureau-approved vehicle lockbox.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 303 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at 
the end the following:

``4049. Secure firearms storage in prison.''.
                                 <all>
```
Frankie OVIES, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6819

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

JAIME ALEJANDRO ESCARSEGA,

#330334 

VS. 

OFFICER FRY

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:23cv898

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Kimberly C. Priest Johnson, who 

issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that Plaintiff’s lawsuit should be dismissed 

without prejudice for want of prosecution. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate 

Judge, which contains proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such 

action, has been presented for consideration. No objections having been timely filed,1 the Court 

concludes that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the 

same as the findings and conclusions of the Court. 

It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. 

All motions by either party not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED. 

1 A copy of the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. #8) was returned as undeliverable on January 2, 2024, and marked, 

Return to Sender-Refused-Unable to Forward” and “Refused-Not in Custody.” (Dkt. #9). Plaintiff has not updated his 

address with the Court.

Case 4:23-cv-00898-ALM-KPJ Document 10 Filed 01/04/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 21
Carlos Alberto OCHOA-OROZCO, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 18-9834

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lone Mountain Mines, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Kevin Murphy, President/CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/ Kevin Murphy Kevin M. Murphy, President, Secretary, CEO Dated:  November 19, 2008
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ultimate Electronics, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/J. EDWARD MCENTIREJ. Edward McEntire
Chief Executive Officer
September 15, 2003 |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ALAN E. KESSOCKAlan E. Kessock
Chief Financial Officer
September 15, 2003       |  | 

---

QuickLinks
BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. PERRIGO COMPANY, et al.

No. 19-450

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
<TABLE>

<CAPTION>

Crossmann Communities, Inc.
Exhibit 11.1 - Computation of Per Share Net Income
For the Period Ended



<S>                                           <C>              <C>              <C>                <C>
                                              Three Months     Three Months     Six Months Ended   Six Months Ended
                                              Ended June 30,   Ended June 30,   June 30,           June 30,
Primary                                           1997             1996               1997               1996 

Weighted Average Number of Shares:

Average Common Shares Outstanding               9,202,948 (2)    9,153,183 (2)      9,195,840 (2)      9,141,165 (2)
Effect of Common Stock Equivalents                 71,240 (2)       56,368 (2)         71,445 (2)         73,438 (2)
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding             9,274,188        9,209,551          9,267,285          9,214,603 
Net Income                                    $ 3,740,263      $ 2,623,712      $   5,793,380      $   3,993,565 
Net Income per Common Share                   $      0.40 (1)  $      0.28 (1)  $        0.63 (1)  $        0.43 (1)

                                              Three Months     Three Months     Six Months Ended   Six Months Ended
                                              Ended June 30,   Ended June 30,   June 30,           June 30,
Fully Diluted                                     1997             1996               1997               1996 

Weighted Average Number of Shares:

Average Common Shares Outstanding               9,202,948 (2)    9,153,183 (2)      9,195,840 (2)      9,141,165 (2)
Effect of Common Stock Equivalents                 79,739 (2)       56,901 (2)         79,952 (2)         68,261 (2)
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding             9,282,687        9,210,084          9,275,792          9,209,426 
Net Income                                    $ 3,740,263      $ 2,623,712       $  5,793,380      $   3,993,565 
Net Income per Common Share                   $      0.40 (1)  $      0.28 (1)   $      0.62 (1)   $       0.43 (1)
<FN>


(1)     This calculation is submitted in accordance with Regulation S-K item 601(b)(11) although not required by
footnote 2 to paragraph 14 of APB Opinion No. 15 because it results in dilution of less than 3%.

(2)     Share amounts have been retroactively adjusted to give effect to a three-for-two stock split to be effected
by a share dividend declared by the Company's Board of Directors on August 7, 1997, and payable on
August 25, 1997 to holders of record on August 18, 1997.
</TABLE>
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (3) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (4) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                November 18, 2008 | By:    | /s/                Cary J. Claiborne                                                              |
|----------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   |   | Cary                J. Claiborne                                                                  |
|                                   |   | Chief                Financial Officer(Principal                Financial and Accounting Officer) |

----
T'Challa Rhashaed WASHINGTON, Petitioner v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 19-5860

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
WATERFRONT MARINE CONSTRUCTION, INC., et al., Petitioners v. HEARD CONSTRUCTION, INC.

No. 18-1394

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 29, 2019

No. 04-19-00086-CR

Nathan FOUGHT,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR10858

Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s court-appointed public defender has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. 

California, 368 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on 

appeal. Counsel has informed appellant of his right to file his own brief and provided appellant 

with a form motion for requesting the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–

20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, 

no writ). The State has filed a letter waiving its right to file an appellee’s brief unless the 

appellant files a pro se brief.

If appellant desires to request the appellate record, he must file the motion requesting the 

record within ten (10) days of the date of this order. If appellant desires to file a pro se brief, he 

must do so within twenty (20) days of the date of this order. If appellant files a pro se brief, the 

State may file a responsive brief no later than twenty (20) days after the date appellant’s pro se 

brief is filed in this court. It is further ORDERED that the motion to withdraw, filed by 

appellant’s counsel, is HELD IN ABEYANCE pending further order of the court.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of May, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
Shawn A. THOMPSON, Petitioner, v. Tom MCGINLEY, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Coal Township.

No. 19-6651

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.