alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000748826
<NAME> SMITH BARNEY MANAGED GOVERNMENT FUND INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                      507,315,869
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                     488,142,541
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,342,824
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                   3,011
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             491,488,376
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                    25,069,792
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                    1,759,263
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                         26,829,055
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                      0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                   516,509,373
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                       10,277,374
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                        9,753,826
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                    (750,884)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                   (31,925,840)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                  (19,173,328)
<NET-ASSETS>                               464,659,321
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                                    0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                           17,082,874
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                               2,536,772
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                     14,546,102
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                   (4,409,385)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                  (6,914,624)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                        3,222,093
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                    3,684,924
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                        644,461
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                    120,913
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                                  0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                    (41,104,144)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                    (1,238,955)
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                 (27,516,455)
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                        1,605,350
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                              2,536,772
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                       119,910,794
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                            12.10
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                   0.38
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                         (0.29)
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                              0.37
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                         0.00
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                              0.00
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                              11.82
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                   0.71


</TABLE>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AU GUST 28, 2014

NO. 03

- 13

- 00298

- CR

Dale Erwin Arldt, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, ROSE, AND GOODWIN

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the pa rties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment . Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction

.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is m ade.
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/11/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      106,413
COMMITMENTS
  24,373    8,255    6,195   69,581   88,804  100,149  103,254    6,264    3,159

CHANGES FROM 03/04/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -791)
     722   -1,579      436   -1,852      308     -694     -835      -97       44

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    22.9      7.8      5.8     65.4     83.5     94.1     97.0      5.9      3.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       92)
      15        7        3       54       35       70       44
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/11/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      267,699
COMMITMENTS
  76,141   43,585    9,510  168,162  202,361  253,813  255,456   13,886   12,243

CHANGES FROM 03/04/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      9,196)
  -3,067    6,864    2,577    8,052   -2,520    7,562    6,921    1,634    2,275

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    28.4     16.3      3.6     62.8     75.6     94.8     95.4      5.2      4.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      186)
      57       28       11       75       60      138       93
```

----

Updated March 18, 2014
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 19, 2016

jam 

# Order

Clerk April 19, 2016

1 53300

D EMAREO JAMINE ALLEN

,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 1 53300

C O A: 330153

KINROSS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY

WARDEN

,

Defendant

- Appellee.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff

- appellant having failed to pay the

partial filing fee as required by the order of March 28 , 20 16 , the Clerk of the Court is

hereby directed to close this file.
Exhibit 10.2      Assignment of Invention 6/18/96

                             ASSIGNMENT OF INVENTION

               (United States Patent Application No. 08/587, 805)

     In consideration of the payment by ASSIGNEE to ASSIGNOR of the sum of One
Dollar ($1.00) and for other good and valuable consideration the receipt of
which is hereby acknowledged, DOUGLAS K. BEPLATE ("ASSIGNOR"), of 245 North
Lions Head Drive, Washington, Utah 84780, United States of America, hereby
sells, assigns, and transfers to EMERGENCY FILTRATION PRODUCTS, INC.
("ASSIGNEE"), a Nevada corporation, whose address is 784 South River Road, P.O.
Box 191, St. George, Utah 84790, and the successors, assigns, and legal
representatives of the ASSIGNEE, the entire right, title, and interest for the
Unite States and its territorial possessions and for all foreign countries,
including all rights to claim priority, in and to any and all inventions that
are disclosed in the patent application which is entitled "Dual-Filtered Rotary
Isolation Valve for Resuscitation" and which is found in United States Patent
Application Serial No. 08/587, 805 filed on January 2, 1996, and, in and to, all
Letters Patent to be obtained for said invention and, as to letters patent, any
reissue, re-examination, or extension thereof and any related statutorily
provided periods of market exclusivity.

     ASSIGNOR hereby represents and warrants that no assignment, sale,
agreement, or encumbrance has been, or will be, made or entered which would
conflict with or be prior in right to this Assignment.

     ASSIGNOR further covenants that ASSIGNEE will, upon its request, be
promptly provided with all pertinent facts and documents relating to said
invention and said Letters Patent and legal equivalents as may be known and
accessible to ASSIGNOR and that ASSIGNOR will testify as to the same in any
interference, litigation, or other proceeding related thereto and will promptly
execute and deliver to ASSIGNEE or its legal representatives any and all papers,
instruments, or affidavits required to apply for, obtain, maintain, issue, and
enforce said invention and said Letters Patent and said equivalents thereof
which may be necessary or desirable to accomplish the purposes thereof or of
this Assignment.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set hand and seal this 18th day of
June, 1996.

                                                    ASSIGNOR:

                                                    \S\ Doug K. Beplate
                                                    Doug K. Beplate
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned, Clive Barwin, President, CEO and Secretary of Melt Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Melt Inc. for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Melt Inc.

 

Dated:  March 29, 2007

 

 

/s/ Clive Barwin                                              

Clive Barwin

President, CEO and Secretary

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Melt Inc. and will be retained by Melt Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[ARTICLE] 6
[CIK] 0000091157
[NAME] U.S. GOVERNMENT SECURITIES FUND - CLASS L
[SERIES]
   [NUMBER] 002
   [NAME] SMITH BARNEY FUNDS, INC.
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   YEAR
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1999
[PERIOD-END]                               DEC-31-1999
[INVESTMENTS-AT-COST]                      239,543,111
[INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE]                     232,299,084
[RECEIVABLES]                                1,463,432
[ASSETS-OTHER]                                       0
[OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS]                                 0
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                             233,762,516
[PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES]                             0
[SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT]                              0
[OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES]                      582,434
[TOTAL-LIABILITIES]                            582,434
[SENIOR-EQUITY]                                      0
[PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON]                   247,589,401
[SHARES-COMMON-STOCK]                        1,129,322
[SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR]                        1,149,911
[ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT]                    1,652,496
[OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII]                               0
[ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS]                    (8,817,788)
[OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS]                             0
[ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC]                   (7,244,027)
[NET-ASSETS]                               233,180,082
[DIVIDEND-INCOME]                                    0
[INTEREST-INCOME]                           17,617,813
[OTHER-INCOME]                                       0
[EXPENSES-NET]                               2,331,025
[NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME]                     15,286,788
[REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT]                   (8,181,916)
[APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT]                  (8,320,262)
[NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS]                      (1,215,390)
[EQUALIZATION]                                       0
[DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME]                      732,991
[DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS]                             0
[DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER]                                0
[NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD]                        254,539
[NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED]                    312,047
[SHARES-REINVESTED]                             36,919
[NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS]                    (51,133,733)
[ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR]                        (5,989)
[ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR]                            0
[OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR]                              0
[OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR]                           0
[GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES]                        1,260,250
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                   0
[GROSS-EXPENSE]                              2,331,025
[AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS]                        14,836,285
[PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN]                            13.40
[PER-SHARE-NII]                                   0.70
[PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC]                         (0.79)
[PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND]                              0.64
[PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS]                         0.00
[RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL]                              0.00
[PER-SHARE-NAV-END]                              12.67
[EXPENSE-RATIO]                                   1.29
</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 17, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-10655

Conference Calendar

DARRELL WAYNE PHILLIPS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL

JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:05-CV-27

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Darrell Wayne Phillips, Texas prisoner # 712352, moves for

a certificate of appealability (COA) and appointment of counsel

to appeal the dismissal as successive of his third 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2254 application challenging his involuntary manslaughter

conviction. He argues that the district court should have

applied the miscarriage of justice exception to the filing of

successive applications.
No. 06-10655

-2-

Phillips, however, has not shown “that jurists of reason

would find it debatable whether . . . the district court was

correct in its procedural ruling.” Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S.

473, 484 (2000). His COA motion is therefore DENIED. 

Phillips’ COA motion is frivolous insofar as it lacks

arguable merit. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th

Cir. 1983). In accordance with this court’s previous warning,

Phillips is now ORDERED to pay a sanction in the amount of $100,

payable to the clerk of this court. The clerk of this court and

the clerks of all federal district courts within this circuit are

directed to refuse to file any pro se civil complaint or appeal

by Phillips unless Phillips submits proof of satisfaction of this

sanction. If Phillips attempts to file any further notices of

appeal or original proceedings in this court without such proof,

the clerk will docket them for administrative purposes only. 

Any other submissions which do not show proof that the sanction

has been paid will be neither addressed nor acknowledged. 

Accordingly, the motions for a COA and appointment of counsel are

DENIED and a SANCTION is IMPOSED.
October 7, 1997
Consulting Group Capital Markets Funds
388 Greenwich Street
New York, New York 10013

                   Re:  Rule 24f-2 Notice
                              
Gentlemen:

    In connection with the filing by Consulting Group
Capital Markets Funds, a Massachusetts business trust (the
"Trust"), of a Notice (the "Notice"), pursuant to Rule 24f-2
(the "Rule") under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as
amended (the "Act"), for the Trust's fiscal year ended
August 31, 1997, the undersigned hereby provides the legal
opinion required by that Rule.

     In accordance with the Rule, the Trust has registered
an indefinite number of shares of common stock, $0.001 par
value, under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"1933 Act"). The purpose of the Notice is to make definite
the registration of 1,170,498,698 shares of the Trust (the
"Shares") sold in reliance upon the Rule during the fiscal
year ended August 31, 1997.

     The undersigned is Associate General Counsel of Smith
Barney Mutual Funds Management Inc., the Trust's Investment
Manager and Administrator, and in such capacity, from time
to time and for certain purposes, acts as counsel to the
Trust. He has examined copies of the Trust's Articles of
Incorporation, its By-Laws, resolutions adopted by its Board
of Trustees, and such other records and documents as have
been deemed necessary for purposes of this opinion.
Furthermore, he has examined a Certificate of the Controller
of the Trust to the effect that the Trust received the cash
consideration for each of the Shares in accordance with the
aforementioned organizational documents and resolutions.

     On the basis of the foregoing, and assuming all of the
Shares were sold in accordance with the terms of the Trust's
Prospectus in effect at the time of sale, he is of the
opinion that the Shares have been duly authorized and
validly issued and are fully paid and non-assessable.  This
opinion is for the limited purposes expressed above and
should not be deemed to be an expression of opinion as to
compliance with the 1933 Act, the 1940 Act or applicable
State "blue sky" laws in connection with the sales of the
Shares.


                                        Very truly yours,


                                        David Barnett
                                        Associate General
                                        Counsel
                                        Smith Barney Mutual
Funds
Management Inc.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION




In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PROLOR
Biotech, Inc. for the three months ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”), the
undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that:




(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PROLOR
      Biotech, Inc.




/s/ Abraham HavronAbraham
      HavronChief
      Executive OfficerPROLOR
      Biotech, Inc.


May 14,
2010




The
certification set forth above is being furnished as an Exhibit solely pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes—Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part
of the Report or as a separate disclosure document of PROLOR Biotech, Inc. or
the certifying officers.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1042 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1042

           To suspend temporarily the duty on Direct Red 243.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2013

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To suspend temporarily the duty on Direct Red 243.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DIRECT RED 243.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Direct Red 243      Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          (CAS No. 52953-36-                                                12/31/2016
                          3) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          3204.14.30)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Pedro Jorge MORENO-GARCIA, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6503

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
NO. 07

- 11

- 00050

- CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

MAY 20 , 2011

MICHAEL GARCIA

, APPELLANT

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , APPELLEE

FROM THE 287TH DISTRICT COURT OF BAILEY COUNTY;

NO. 2637A ; HONORABLE GORDON HOUSTON GREEN , JUDGE

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

Appellant, Michael Garcia, filed Notice of Appeal to appeal a judgment of

conviction entered against him in cause number 2637A in the 287 th District Court of

Bailey County, Texas. However, appellant has now filed a motion to dismiss his appeal.

Because the motion meets the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 42.2(a) and this Court has not delivered its decision prior to receivi ng it, the

motion is hereby granted and the appeal is dismissed. Having dismissed the appeal at2

appellant = s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will

issue.

Mackey K. Hancock

Justice

Do not publish.
Jean-Gespere PIERRE, Petitioner, v. Dora L. IRIZARRY, Chief Judge, et al.

No. 19-7997.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

falm+t. 13, 1939 

tilttab to nwlre the for8 rarm4 in raaordanw with