alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate recor d, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argumentwould not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. Se e Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The cause is therefore ordered su bmitted without oral argument. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### MAY 13 1999 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT
JIMMY DAVID HARDIN, Petitioner - Appellant, vs. R. MICHAEL CODY, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Respondents - Appellees. No. 98-7064 (D.C. No. 95-CV-94-B) (E.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before ANDERSON , KELLY , and BRISCOE , Circuit Judges. **
Mr. Hardin, an inmate appearing pro se, appeals fro m the district court’s dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The magistrate judge, whose findings and r ecommendations were- 2 -

adopted by the district court, found that Mr. Hardi n had failed to exhaust available state court remedies as required by § 225 4(b). The district court also denied a certificate of appealability. Raising the same issues he raised in the district c ourt, Mr. Hardin argues that this court should grant a certificate of appea lability because the state trial court impermissibly used two prior felony convictio ns to enhance the sentence which he is currently serving. Mr. Hardin was conv icted and sentenced on May 15, 1992, and his direct appeal was dismissed by th e Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals for failure to prosecute on May 3, 1994. H e filed his federal habeas petition on March 1, 1995, and subsequently filed apost-conviction application for a direct appeal out of time with the state district court on May 6, 1996. This application was granted, and Mr. Hardin raised nine issues in his appeal. However, he failed to challenge the use of the prio r convictions to enhance his sentence. His conviction and sentence were affirme d by the Court of Criminal Appeals on April 17, 1997. Mr. Hardin has yet to p ursue state post-conviction remedies. Given these facts, we agree with the recommendationof the magistrate, adopted by the district court, that Mr. Hardin’s pe tition be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b). We DENY his request- 3 -

for a certificate of appealability and DISMISS his appeal.

Entered for the Court Paul J. Kelly, Jr. Circuit Judge
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 21, 2014

No. 04-14-00485-CV

IN RE Maria Del Socorro GONZALEZ and Cesario Gonzalez

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On July 18, 2014, real party in interest Francisco Tovar Jr. filed a motion for extension of 

time to file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus. The motion is GRANTED. A 

response on behalf of the real party in interest is now due July 31, 2014. 

It is so ORDERED on July 21st, 2014. PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 7,848, styled In the Interest of C.J.V., A Child, pending in the 49th Judicial 

District Court, Zapata County, Texas, the Honorable H. Paul Canales presiding.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0171 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CHINA ROSE DAWN DAVIS,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 14, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 7 2022

10/07/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0171
Independent Auditors' Report


To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
the Salomon Funds Trust:

In planning and performing our audits of the financial statements
of the Salomon Brothers National Tax Free Bond Fund, Salomon
Brothers California Tax Free Bond Fund, Salomon Brothers New York
Tax Free Bond Fund, and Salomon Brothers Mid Cap Fund of the
Salomon Funds Trust (the Funds) for the year ended December 31,
2002, we considered their internal control, including control
activities for safeguarding securities, in order to determine our
auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on
the financial statements and to comply with the requirements of
Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on internal control.

The management of the Funds is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Those controls include the safeguarding of assets against
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, error or
fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any
evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to
the risk that it may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in internal control that might be material
weaknesses under standards established by the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness is a
condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the
internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low
level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in
amounts that would be material in relation to the financial
statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a
timely period by employees in the normal course of performing
their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters involving
internal control and its operation, including controls for
safeguarding securities that we consider to be material
weaknesses as defined above as of December 31, 2002.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management and the Board of Trustees of the Funds and the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not intended to be and
should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.


                                                  KPMG LLP

New York, New York
February 12, 2003
Order entered April 12, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-18-01390-CV IN RE DALLAS PLASTIC SURGERY INSTITUTE, INC., DALLAS DAY SURGERY CENTER, INC., S AMEER SUBHASH JEJURIKAR, M.D. , AND SAMEER SUBHASH JEJURIKAR, M.D., P.A. , Relators Original Proceeding from the 14th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-15886



### ORDER Before Justices Bridges and Whitehill Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relators’ petitions for writ of

mandamus. We LIFT the Court’s November 16, 2018 stay of the requirement that rel ators comply with paragraph 4 of the trial court’s October 24, 2018 d iscovery order and LIFT the Court’s November 27, 2018 stay of the trial court’s November 7, 2018 order requiring relators to produce medical records. We ORDER relators to bear their own co sts, if any, of this original proceeding.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE
David GRAY, Petitioner v. Phil BRYANT, Governor of Mississippi, et al.

No. 19-5495

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Jose Luis GARZA, et al., Petitioners v. CITY OF DONNA, TEXAS

No. 19-276

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# Official Journal C 427I/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 427I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6219 December 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 427I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6219 December 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 427 I/01 | Call for applications for the Jan Amos Comenius Prize for high-quality teaching about the European Union | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2019/C 427 I/01

Call for applications for the Jan Amos Comenius Prize for high-quality teaching about the European Union

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

V Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

| 19.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 427/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 427/1

---

Call for applications

for the ‘Jan Amos Comenius Prize for high-quality teaching about the European Union’

(2019/C 427 I/01)

The Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture of the European Commission has launched a Call for Applications for the European Union’s ‘Jan Amos Comenius Prize for high quality teaching about the European Union’.

The prize will reward secondary schools that help their pupils learn about the European Union in ways that inspire. It will provide EU-wide recognition and visibility to relevant work in each Member State and will highlight the importance of teaching and learning about the EU at a young age. It will showcase innovative teaching methods that engage pupils actively in learning about the EU and will help spread these practices.

The call is open to secondary schools (ISCED level 2 and ISCED level 3) established and based in the European Union (not to individual teachers).

This contest will award up to twenty-eight (28) prizes of EUR 8 000 each, one per EU Member State.

If the United Kingdom withdraws from the EU before the award decision is taken by the European Commission (this comes soon after the assessment of the applications) without an agreement ensuring that UK applicants continue to be eligible, UK schools will cease to be eligible for this prize. In this case, the maximum number of prizes will be 27 (instead of 28) but the amount per prize will remain the same (EUR 8 000).

The deadline for applications is 17.00 CET on Thursday 6 February 2020.

All relevant information and application forms are available at:

https://ec.europa.eu/education/resources-and-tools/funding-opportunities/jan-amos-comenius-prize_en

---
Trista RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. NATIONWIDE HOMES, INC., et al.

No. 18-9353

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Carlos Lamar MITCHELL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5070

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 10.2
------------

                                                          Zomex - Business World


                              Contract for Services
                              ---------------------

BETWEEN:
-------

Business World I.T. Inc. ("Business World")
101 - 1515 Broadway Street
Port Coquitlam, B.C. V3C 6M2                         OF THE FIRST PART,

AND
---

Zomex Distribution Inc.  ("Zomex")
5205 Buchanan Road
Peachland, B.C.                                      OF THE SECOND PART


WHEREAS,
-------

Zomex is desirous of securing Marketing and Sales expertise to promote their
existing software ("Convention System Software") undergoing a full re-write and
said software is intended to emerge as a new Windows version;

THE PARTIES AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING:
----------------------------------

The duration of this 6 month contract is from January 5 2004 to June 30 2004.
The value of this contract is $30,000 Canadian Funds.

Business World shall:

1.   Perform additional Internet and phone market research in the Convention
     Software marketplace. The findings from this will be summarized in report
     fashion and delivered to Zomex by no later than March 31 2004;
2.   The necessary features for successful market penetration will form part of
     this report. Interim market feature findings and needs will be delivered to
     Zomex from time to time but no less than every 2 weeks. The intention of
     the interim delivery points is to provide contractor(s) performing software
     development to be aware of the emerging needs;
3.   Assist, as required, the software contractors with a GAP analysis of
     features presently in the software;
4.   Call on potential clients to further assess the marketplace potential;
5.   Inventory any known salesperson candidates for eventual hire by Zomex;
6.   Prepare sales collateral and literature;

Zomex shall:

1.   Provide sufficient meeting time to adequately assist Business World with
     communication of known market information and business goals;
2.   Provide payment of this contract to Business World as follows:

     Date                              Amount
     ---------------------      -------------
     July 1 2004                    10,000.00



                                                                     Page 1 of 2
<PAGE>



                                                          Zomex - Business World



     August 1 2004                  10,000.00
     September 1 2004               10,000.00

        Total                       30,000.00


Agreed to this 5th day of January, 2004:




-----------------------                        -------------------------

For Business World                             For Zomex





































                                                                     Page 2 of 2
```
 
 
WHEAT-HRSpring - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                          Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 09/16/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       60,824
COMMITMENTS
  17,306    7,209    3,231   29,720   37,836   50,257   48,276   10,567   12,548

CHANGES FROM 09/09/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,972)
     207     -283      787    3,097    2,260    4,091    2,764     -119    1,208

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    28.5     11.9      5.3     48.9     62.2     82.6     79.4     17.4     20.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       88)
      20       16       13       40       32       67       56
```

----

Updated September 19, 2014
CERTIFICATIONS



I, Douglas P. Condie, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this
amended quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A, for the quarter ended March 31, 2004,
of STAT Software, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a) 
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) 
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) 
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) 
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) 
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date:  May 
2, 2005





/s/ Douglas P. Condie

President
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 119 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 119

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on any legislative day from Thursday, 
November 20, 2014, through Friday, November 28, 2014, on a motion 
offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader 
or his designee, it stand adjourned until 2:00 p.m. on Monday, December 
1, 2014, or until the time of any

              

 reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns 
on any day from Thursday, November 20, 2014, through Friday, November 
28, 2014, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by 
its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed or adjourned 
until noon on Monday, December 1, 2014, or such other time on that day 
as may be specified by its Majority Leader or his designee in the 
motion to recess or adjourn, or until the time of any reassembly 
pursuant to section 3 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs 
first.
    Sec. 2. (a) The Speaker or his designee, after consultation with 
the Minority Leader of the House, shall notify Members of the House to 
reassemble at such place and time as he may designate if, in his 
opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
    (b) After reassembling pursuant to subsection (a), when the House 
adjourns on a motion offered pursuant to this subsection by its 
Majority Leader or his designee, the House shall again stand adjourned 
pursuant to the first section of this concurrent resolution.
    Sec. 3. (a) The Majority Leader of the Senate or his designee, 
after concurrence with the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify 
the Members of the Senate to reassemble at such place and time as he 
may designate if, in his opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
    (b) After reassembling pursuant to subsection (a), when the Senate 
adjourns on a motion offered pursuant to this subsection by its 
Majority Leader or his designee, the Senate shall again stand adjourned 
pursuant to the first section of this concurrent resolution.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 20, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 119

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives 
         and a conditional recess or adjournment of the Senate.
```
Demetrias TAYLOR, as Representative of the Estate of Iretha Jean Lilly, Deceased, et al., Petitioners, v. MCLENNAN COUNTY, TEXAS, et al.

No. 19-1223.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 26, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.