alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018449EN.01003701.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 13.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 449/37 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9206 — Equistone Partners Europe/Courir)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 449/10)

1.

On 4 December 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018449EN.01003701-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Equistone Partners Europe S.A.S (‘EPE SAS’, France), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Courir France S.A.S (‘Courir’, France). |

EPE SAS acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Courir.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | EPE SAS is an investment firm established in the form of a simplified joint stock company with investments in companies with enterprise values of between EUR 50 and 500 million, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Courir is active on retail of footwear and to a lesser extent of sportswear and accessories in specialised stores. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018449EN.01003701-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9206 — Equistone Partners Europe/Courir

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| E-mail: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018449EN.01003701-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018449EN.01003701-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5
<CIK>                                              0000911503
<NAME>                          SMITH BARNEY DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND L.P

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                       SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                        126,660,401
<SECURITIES>                                                    5,385,815
<RECEIVABLES>                                                     380,432
<ALLOWANCES>                                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              132,426,648
<PP&E>                                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                132,426,648
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           2,404,879
<BONDS>                                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                                             0
<COMMON>                                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                                    130,021,769
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  132,426,648
<SALES>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                3,021,592
<CGS>                                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                3,963,467
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  (941,875)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                         0
<CHANGES>                                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     (941,875)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                       (8.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                           0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.21.6

                        SIXTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AND
                          NON-COMPETITION AND AGREEMENT

         This Sixth  Amendment is made on the 4th day of February  2004,  by and
between  GEORGE  R.  JENSEN,  JR.  ("Jensen"),  and USA  TECHNOLOGIES,  INC.,  a
Pennsylvania corporation ("USA").

                                   Background

         USA and Jensen entered into an Employment And Non-Competition Agreement
dated November 20, 1997, a First Amendment thereto dated June 17, 1999, a Second
Amendment  thereto  dated  February 22, 2000, a Third  Amendment  thereto  dated
January 16, 2002, a Fourth  Amendment  thereto dated April 15, 2002, and a Fifth
Amendment  thereto  dated July 16,  2003.  As more fully set forth  herein,  the
parties desire to amend the Agreement in certain respects.

                                    Agreement

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants set forth herein, and
intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties agree as follows:

         1. Amendment.  Subparagraph (a) of Section 2. Compensation and Benefits
is hereby deleted the following new  subparagraph (a) is hereby added to Section
2 of the Agreement:

        (a) In  consideration  of his  services  rendered,  commencing
        January  1,  2004,  USA shall  pay to Jensen a base  salary of
        $250,000 per year during the Employment Period, subject to any

<PAGE>

        withholding  required  by law.  Jensen's  base  salary  may be
        increased  from time to time in the discretion of the Board of
        Directors.

         2.  Modification.   Except  as  otherwise  specifically  set  forth  in
Paragraph 1, the Agreement shall not be amended or modified in any
respect whatsoever and shall continue in full force and effect.

         3. Capitalized Terms. Except as specifically provided otherwise herein,
all  capitalized  terms used herein shall have the meanings  ascribed to them in
the Agreement.

         4. Effective  Time. The amendments to the Agreement made in Paragraph 1
hereof shall be effective from and after January 1, 2004.

         IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  parties  hereto  have  executed  this Sixth
Amendment on the day and year first above written.


                                            /s/ George R. Jensen, Jr.
                                            --------------------------------
                                            GEORGE R. JENSEN, JR.


                                            USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.



                                            By: /s/ Stephen P. Herbert
                                               -----------------------------
                                                    Stephen P. Herbert,
                                                    President
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 1995

DOUGLAS STAUFFER BELL; NANCY CLARK BELL
,
Petitioners

- Appellants
,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
, Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States Tax Court. ( Tax Ct. No. 001973

- 10L )

Submitted : January 18, 2018 Decided: January 22, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Douglas Stauffer Bell, Nancy Clark Bell, Appellants Pro Se. Kathleen E. Lyon , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Douglas Stauffer Bell and Na ncy Clark Bell seek to appeal the tax court’s order
dismissing in part, and remanding in part to the Internal Revenue Service Office of
Appeals , their petition in the underlying collection due process proceeding. This court
may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain
interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen
v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). The order the Bell s seek
to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
Accordingly, we grant the Commissioner’s motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of
jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately prese nted in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

DISMISSED
Benoit BROOKENS, Petitioner v. Patrick PIZZELLA, Acting Secretary of Labor

No. 19-418

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
[ARTICLE] 6
[CIK] 0000355747
[NAME] CONTRARIAN FUND - CLASS A
[SERIES]
   [NUMBER] 004
   [NAME] SMITH BARNEY INVESTMENT FUNDS INC.
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   YEAR
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1999
[PERIOD-END]                               DEC-31-1999
[INVESTMENTS-AT-COST]                      280,391,076
[INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE]                     284,157,924
[RECEIVABLES]                               69,050,523
[ASSETS-OTHER]                                     877
[OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS]                                 0
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                             35,320,9324
[PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES]                         8,090
[SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT]                              0
[OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES]                   68,493,020
[TOTAL-LIABILITIES]                         68,501,110
[SENIOR-EQUITY]                                      0
[PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON]                   263,025,188
[SHARES-COMMON-STOCK]                        4,604,992
[SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR]                        8,477,978
[ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT]                      223,189
[OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII]                               0
[ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS]                     17,692,989
[OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS]                             0
[ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC]                     3,766,848
[NET-ASSETS]                               284,708,214
[DIVIDEND-INCOME]                            8,465,172
[INTEREST-INCOME]                              442,978
[OTHER-INCOME]                                       0
[EXPENSES-NET]                               6,542,912
[NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME]                      2,365,238
[REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT]                    44,461,397
[APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT]                 (66,691,190)
[NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS]                     (19,864,555)
[EQUALIZATION]                                       0
[DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME]                      529,066
[DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS]                     8,922,704
[DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER]                                0
[NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD]                      2,004,542
[NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED]                  6,602,940
[SHARES-REINVESTED]                            725,412
[NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS]                   (239,921,073)
[ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR]                        105,339
[ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR]                   14,827,377
[OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR]                              0
[OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR]                           0
[GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES]                        3,442,248
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                   0
[GROSS-EXPENSE]                              6,542,912
[AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS]                        84,362,655
[PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN]                            13.62
[PER-SHARE-NII]                                   0.12
[PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC]                         (0.78)
[PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND]                              0.11
[PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS]                         1.52
[RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL]                              0.00
[PER-SHARE-NAV-END]                              11.33
[EXPENSE-RATIO]                                   1.28
</TABLE>
10f-3 REPORT

                        TRAVELERS SEREIS TRUST
                        QUALITY BOND PORTFOLIO

                 July 1, 2002 through December 31, 2002

                     Trade                                    % of
Issuer               Date    Selling Dealer    Amount   Price Issue(1)

Duke Energy Corp.   10/3/02  UBS Warburg    $260,000  $ 99.42  0.12%A
    4.250% due 9/1/08

(1) Represents purchases by all affiliated funds; may not exceed
    25% of the offering.

A - Includes purchases of $150,000 by other affiliated mutual funds.







                             10f-3 REPORT

                        TRAVELERS SERIES TRUST
                       SOCIAL AWARENESS STOCK PORTFOLIO

                 January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2002

                   Trade                                        % of
Issuer             Date    Selling Dealer    Amount     Price   Issue(1)

WellChoice Inc.  11/7/02   CS First Boston   $39,000  $25.00   0.30%A
                           Corp.


(1) Represents purchases by all affiliated funds; may not exceed
    25% of the offering.

A - Includes purchases of $1,211,000 by other affiliated mutual funds.


                          10f-3 REPORT

                        TRAVELERS SERIES TRUST
                       FEDERATED HIGH YIELD PORTFOLIO

                September 1, 2002 through December 31, 2002

                   Trade                                        % of
Issuer             Date    Selling Dealer    Amount     Price   Issue(1)

Jefferson Smurfit 9/10/02   Morgan Stanley  $125,000  $100.00   0.04%A
Corp., 8.250% due 10/1/12


(1) Represents purchases by all affiliated funds; may not exceed
    25% of the offering.

A - Includes purchases of $175,000 by other affiliated mutual funds.
Allen DODSON, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES;

Bryan Six, Petitioner v. United States;

Kendal Ray Williams, aka Kendall Ray Williams, Petitioner v. United States;

Kenneth Roy Gibson, aka John Worth, Petitioner v. United States;

Eric Ronald Bolduan, Petitioner v. United States;

Monty Englehart, Petitioner v. United States.

No. 19-6626

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 16, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018322EN.01001901.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 12.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 322/19 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.8960 — Adient/Boeing/JV (Aircraft seats))

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 322/09)

1.

On 31 August 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018322EN.01001901-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Adient US LLC, controlled by Adient plc (‘Adient’, United States), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | The Boeing Company (‘Boeing’, United States), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Adient Aerospace, LLC (United States). |

Adient US LLC and Boeing acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Adient Aerospace, LLC.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Adient: design, manufacture and marketing of a range of seating systems and seating components for passenger cars, commercial vehicles and light trucks,

—   for Boeing: design, manufacture and sale of commercial jetliners and defence, space and security systems globally,

—   for Adient Aerospace, LLC: design, development, manufacture and sale of aircraft seats.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.8960 — Adient/Boeing/JV (Aircraft seats)

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| E-mail: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018322EN.01001901-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---
Benjamin R. SCHWARZ, Petitioner v. Erwin MEINBERG, et al.

No. 19-5776

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

** **

** **

**World Omni Financial Corp.**

**Servicer Compliance Statement**

**Pursuant to Item 1123**

**of Regulation AB**

** **

** **

** **

I, Joseph A. Venezia,do hereby certify that I am the Chief Financial Officer of World Omni Financial Corp., a Florida corporation, and further certifyon behalf of World Omni Financial Corp. in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer”) under the Exchange Note ServicingSupplement 2018-A to Closed-End Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 14, 2018 (the “Exchange Note Servicing Supplement”),among AL Holding Corp., as Closed-End Collateral Agent, World Omni LT, as Titling Trust, and the Servicer, as follows:

 

(i)                 A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period covered by the issuing entity’s Annual Report on Form10-K and covered by the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement and the Closed-End Servicing Agreement (as defined in the Exchange NoteServicing Supplement) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performanceunder the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement and the Closed-End Servicing Agreement (as defined in the Exchange Note ServicingSupplement), has been made under my supervision.

 

(ii)               To the best of my knowledge, based on the review described above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations underthe Exchange Note Servicing Supplement and the Closed-End Servicing Agreement (as defined in the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement)in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereuntoset my hand as of March 6, 2020
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 133420 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 133420 

 COA: 271652 
 Wayne CC: 03-008533-01

ERROL LASHONE HINTON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 31, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d0618 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 26, 2007 

 Clerk
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q REPORTOFREDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC.PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(CHAPTER 63, TITLE 18 U.S.C. SS.SS. 1350(a) AND (b))**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350(a) and (b)), theundersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2005 of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc.(the ‘‘Company’’) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  November 3,2005
| /s/ STEVEN J. JANUSEK                      |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| Steven J. Janusek, Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63,Title 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350(a) and (b)), is not a part of the Form 10-Qto which it refers and is, to the extent permitted by law, provided by theabove signatory to the extent of his knowledge.

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by ReddyIce Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

----