alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018110EN.01002901.xml

| 23.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 110/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 110/29

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2018/C 110/05)

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Peroxosulphates
  (persulphates) | The People’s Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1343/2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of peroxosulphates (persulphates) originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (OJ L 338, 17.12.2013, p. 11) | 18.12.2018 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Peroxosulphates

(persulphates)

The People’s Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1343/2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of peroxosulphates (persulphates) originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (OJ L 338, 17.12.2013, p. 11)

18.12.2018

---

(1)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

1

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY
RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 CERTIFICATIONS
 I, W. Anderson Geater, Jr., certify that:
 1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Origen Financial, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




---



##### 



5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent function):
   Dated: November 14, 2005/s/ W. Anderson Geater, Jr.W. Anderson Geater, Jr.,Chief Financial Officer of Origen Financial, Inc.
<PAGE>








                                 April 15, 2003
                                                                  (212) 838-8040

Mr. K. Tucker Andersen
61 Above All Road
Warren, CT 06754

                         New Line of Credit for $900,000
                                       and
                     Extension of Maturity Date on $500,000
                         Owed Under 2001 Line of Credit


Dear Tucker:

     This will confirm that you have opened a new line of credit for Milestone
Scientific Inc., in the aggregate amount of $900,000. Borrowings under line will
bear interest at the rate of 8% per annum and will be evidenced by a promissory
note in usual form. Monies may be drawn by Milestone under the line upon 10
days' written notice to you from either Milestone's Chief Executive Officer or
Chief Financial Officer. The line will expire and borrowings under the line and
interest thereon will be payable in cash on January 2, 2005.

     This will also confirm that you have agreed to further extend the payment
date of the $500,000 owed under the Line of Credit dated January 29, 2001, which
is not now payable in stock at Milestone's election, from December 31, 2003
until January 2, 2005.

     This letter replaces and cancels the commitment in our earlier letter dated
April 8, 2003 which you countersigned.

     If this conforms with your understanding with Milestone please countersign
and return the copy of this letter.

                                                     Very truly yours

                                                     Stephen A. Zelnick
Accepted and agreed to
this 15th day of April, 2003

/s/ K. Tucker Andersen
----------------------
K. Tucker Andersen
Christopher Michael THRASHER, Petitioner, v. ALABAMA.

No. 19-7751.

Supreme Court of the United States.

June 1, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama denied.
EXHIBIT
35.1



SERVICER
COMPLIANCE STATEMENT



Re:
Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC, in its capacity as Servicer (the “Servicer”) under the Amended and Restated
Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2009, among Daimler Trust, as Titling Trust, Daimler Title Co., as Collateral Agent,
and Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC, as Lender and as Servicer (the “Servicing Agreement”), and under the
2018-A Servicing Supplement, dated as of January 1, 2018, among the same parties (the “Servicing Supplement”) for
the period from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019 (the “Reporting Period”)



I,
Brian T. Stevens, certify that:



| | (a) | A
                                         review of the Servicer’s activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance
                                         under the Servicing Agreement and the Servicing Supplement has been made under my supervision.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | To
                                         the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its
                                         obligations under the Servicing Agreement and the Servicing Supplement in all material
                                         respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated:
March 19, 2020



| | /s/
    Brian T. Stevens                 | 
| | ---------------------------------------- | 
| | Name:
    Brian T. Stevens              
| | Title:
    Vice President and Controller
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1136 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1136

 To amend the Hate Crime Statistics Act to include crimes against the 
                               homeless.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 13, 2013

Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas (for herself, Ms. Lee of California, 
Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Mr. Danny K. Davis of Illinois, Ms. Norton, Ms. 
     Wilson of Florida, Mr. Rangel, Mr. Hastings of Florida, Mrs. 
  Napolitano, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Lewis, Mr. Gutierrez, and Ms. Loretta 
    Sanchez of California) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Hate Crime Statistics Act to include crimes against the 
                               homeless.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Violence Against the Homeless 
Accountability Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF HOMELESS.

    Section 1(b) of the Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note) 
is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ``homeless status,'' 
        after ``sexual orientation,''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(6) As used in this subsection, the term `homeless 
        status' with respect to an individual, refers to an individual 
        who--
                    ``(A) lacks a fixed, regular, and adequate 
                nighttime residence; or
                    ``(B) has a primary nighttime residence that is--
                            ``(i) a public or private place not 
                        designed for, or ordinarily used as, a regular 
                        sleeping accommodation for human beings, 
                        including cars, parks, public spaces, abandoned 
                        buildings, substandard housing, bus or train 
                        stations, or similar settings;
                            ``(ii) a supervised publicly or privately 
                        operated shelter designed to provide temporary 
                        living accommodations, including motels, 
                        hotels, congregate shelters, and transitional 
                        housing; or
                            ``(iii) housing of other persons in which 
                        the individual is temporarily staying due to 
                        loss of housing, economic hardship, or a 
                        similar reason.''.
                                 <all>
```
Michael E. GOYNES, Jr., Petitioner v. NEBRASKA

No. 19-6267

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nebraska denied.
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/05/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       90,052
COMMITMENTS
  24,989    4,825      970   59,220   82,099   85,179   87,894    4,873    2,158

CHANGES FROM 02/26/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -100)
  16,610       93      958  -16,965   -1,141      603      -90     -703      -10

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    27.7      5.4      1.1     65.8     91.2     94.6     97.6      5.4      2.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       72)
      10        5        4       36       34       47       42
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/05/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      193,856
COMMITMENTS
  64,245   27,270    4,377  106,627  156,975  175,249  188,622   18,607    5,234

CHANGES FROM 02/26/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      5,549)
  17,185    3,753    3,155  -16,010   -2,121    4,330    4,787    1,219      762

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    33.1     14.1      2.3     55.0     81.0     90.4     97.3      9.6      2.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      144)
      40       16        7       67       45      111       64
```

----

Updated March 8, 2013
EXHIBIT 31.b

I, Marc N. Teal, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BCTC V Assignor Corp. (the "Assignor");
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|November 14, 2006 | /s/ Marc N. Teal                                    
|----------------- | ----------------------------------------------------
|                  | Marc N. Teal                                        
|                  | (Principal Financial Officer), BCTC V Assignor Corp.
|                  |
DeAnna MORROW, Petitioner, v. WEST CENTRAL GEORGIA WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION.

No. 19M82

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time under Rule 14.5 denied.
# Official Journal L 331/2011

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2011.331.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 331 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5414 December 2011 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2011.331.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 331

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5414 December 2011

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | GUIDELINES |
| | | 2011/817/EU |
| | * | Guideline of the European Central Bank of 20 September 2011 on monetary policy instruments and procedures of the Eurosystem (ECB/2011/14) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

GUIDELINES

2011/817/EU

*

Guideline of the European Central Bank of 20 September 2011 on monetary policy instruments and procedures of the Eurosystem (ECB/2011/14)

(ECB/2011/14)

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# C_2018100EN.01000101.xml

| 16.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8779 — PAI Partners/Albea)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 100/01)

On 2 March 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8779. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8779. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 01-3699

___________ Lance Addison; Steven R. Schuyler; * Patricia Fitzharris, * * Appellees, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District v. * of Minnesota. * Everest Connections Corporation; * [UNPUBLISHED] Everest Global Technologies, LLC; * Utilicorp United, Inc., * * Appellants. *

___________ Submitted: June 13, 2002 Filed: June 20, 2002

___________ Before HANSEN, Chief Judge, FAGG and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. UtiliCorp United, Inc. entered into a limited liability company (LLC) agreement with GLA New Ventures to form Everest Global Technologies, LLC, a holding company for corporations engaged in cable, telephone, and internet services. Later, UtiliCorp and GLA created Everest Connections Corporation, a subsidiary of Everest Global, to build, operate, and license the proposed telecommunications business. Three former employees of Everest Global and Everest Connections sued* The Honorable Paul Magnuson, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. -2- them seeking money damages for breach of contract and tortious interference with contract arising out of their employment. The former employees also sought declaratory relief on a noncompetition agreement. The business entities moved to dismiss or to compel arbitration based on a clause in the LLC agreement requiring disputes arising out of or related to the agreement to be settled by arbitration. Because the former employees were not parties to the LLC agreement, the district court * denied the motion. Everest Connections, Everest Global, and UtiliCorp appeal asserting the former employees should be required to arbitrate their claims and any claims not submitted to arbitration should be stayed pending arbitration. Having carefully reviewed the record, we disagree. The former employees are not parties to the LLC agreement and the claims they assert in this case do not arise under that agreement. The former employees did sign letter agreements, employment agreements, noncompetition agreements, and stock vesting agreements with Everest Connections and Everest Global, but these agreements contain no arbitration clause, and state the parties will submit disputes to federal or state courts. The vesting agreements do provide that certain terms of the LLC agreement applicable to “members” govern the parties’ rights, but the arbitration clause of the LLC agreement does not govern “members” as the agreement defines those terms. Further, the vesting agreements make no reference to the LLC agreement’s arbitration clause, and the former employees were not given a copy of the LLC agreement before signing the vesting agreements. We thus affirm on the basis of the district court’s opinion. See 8 th Cir. R. 47B.-3- A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.