alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; NST-1 Overflow Review.                    

*Date:*                         June 29, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         William C. Benzing, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, NINDS, NIH NSC, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Suite 3204, MSC, 9529 Rockville, MD 20852, 301-496-0660,                         *benzingw@mail.nih.gov*.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 10, 2022. 

Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-12949 Filed 6-15-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
NO. 07-01-0229-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

OCTOBER 2, 2001

______________________________

ELMER EDSON HAYES, AKA EDDIE HAYES, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 108TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 43.619-E; HONORABLE ABE LOPEZ, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

DISMISSAL

Pursuant to a guilty plea and plea bargain, appellant was convicted for reckless

injury to a child causing serious bodily injury and punishment was assessed as

recommended at ten years confinement. Appellant filed a pro se general notice of appeal

from his conviction. We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
2

When an appeal is made from a judgment rendered on a defendant’s guilty plea and

the punishment assessed does not exceed the punishment recommended by the State, a

notice of appeal must comply with Rule 25.2(b)(3) of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure. Moreover, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals held in Cooper v. State, 45

S.W.3d 77, 83 (Tex.Cr.App. 2001) that voluntariness of a plea is no longer appealable

from plea-bargained felony convictions. Thus, because appellant filed a general notice

of appeal, we are without jurisdiction to entertain any possible complaints appellant might

have raised. 

Accordingly, we dismiss for want of jurisdiction.

Don H. Reavis

 Justice

Do not publish.
EXHIBIT 6

FILED UNDER SEAL 

PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case 2:24-cv-00093-JRG Document 88-6 Filed 10/16/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 4375
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC.**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

**(CHAPTER 98, TITLE 15 U.S.C. SS. 7241)**

 

I, William P. Brick, certifythat:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this report; and

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)             Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

a)              All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)             Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

 

Date: May 16, 2005

 
| /s/ WILLIAM P. BRICK |   |   |
|----------------------|--------|--------|

William P. Brick, ChiefExecutive Officer

 

----
CC

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0229

SISTER MARY JO MCDONALD, LORI MALONEY, FRITZ DAILY, BOB BROWN,

DOROTHY BRADLEY, VERNON FINLEY, MAE NAN ELLINGSON; AND THE 

LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MONTANA,

Plaintiffs and Appellees,

V.

CHRISTI JACOBSEN, MONTANA SECRETARY OF STATE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s unopposed motion for expedited 

briefing schedule, and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following briefing schedule is 

adopted:

 Appellant shall file her Opening Brief by June 9

 Appellees shall file their Answer Brief by June 29

 Appellant shall file her Reply Brief by July 6

No extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 10 2022

06/10/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0229
# C_2018148EN.01001401.xml

| 27.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/14

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2018/C 148/09)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 22.3.2018 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 22.3.2018-30.6.2018 |
| Member State | European Union (All Member States) |
| Stock or Group of stocks | RED/N3M. |
| Species | Redfish (Sebastes spp.) |
| Zone | NAFO 3M |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 07/TQ120 |

Date and time of closure

22.3.2018

Duration

22.3.2018-30.6.2018

Member State

European Union (All Member States)

Stock or Group of stocks

RED/N3M.

Species

Redfish (Sebastes spp.)

Sebastes

Zone

NAFO 3M

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

07/TQ120

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Origen Financial, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), the undersigned officers, Ronald A. Klein and W. Anderson Geater, Jr.,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge:(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Ronald A. Klein
    
    
    
    Dated: May 12, 2008Ronald A. Klein, Chief Executive Officer/s/ W. Anderson Geater, Jr.
    
    
    
    Dated: May 12, 2008W. Anderson Geater Jr., Chief Financial Officer
  37
Jim R. NASH, Petitioner v. Norma NASH, et al.

No. 19-363

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arkansas denied.
Christopher B. RAMIREZ, Petitioner v. WASHINGTON.

No. 19-5153

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3 denied.
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

RICHARD JAMES KIRTLEY, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 15-0144 PRPC

FILED 3-14-2017

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2008-180683-001

The Honorable Cari A. Harrison, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Diane Meloche

Counsel for Respondent

Richard James Kirtley, San Luis

Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Judge James P. Beene delivered the decision of the Court, in which 

Presiding Judge Diane M. Johnsen and Judge Margaret H. Downie joined.
STATE v. KIRTLEY

Decision of the Court

2

B E E N E, Judge:

¶1 Petitioner Richard James Kirtley petitions this Court for 

review from the summary dismissal of his second petition for postconviction relief. A jury found Kirtley guilty of four drug offenses and the 

trial court sentenced him to an aggregate term of twelve years’ 

imprisonment. This Court affirmed Kirtley’s convictions and sentences on 

direct appeal. Kirtley argues his trial counsel and his first post-conviction 

relief counsel were ineffective.

¶2 We deny relief. Kirtley could have raised the claims of 

ineffective assistance of trial counsel in his first post-conviction relief 

proceeding in 2013. Any claim a defendant could have raised in an earlier 

post-conviction relief proceeding is precluded. Ariz. R. Crim. P. 32.2(a). 

None of the exceptions under Rule 32.2(b) apply. Regarding ineffective 

assistance of post-conviction relief counsel, a defendant is not entitled to 

effective assistance of counsel in a post-conviction relief proceeding unless 

the proceeding was an “of-right” proceeding. State v. Pruett, 185 Ariz. 128, 

131 (App. 1995). Kirtley’s first proceeding was not an “of-right” 

proceeding. Finally, the trial court dismissed Kirtley’s first post-conviction 

proceeding in April 2014 and Kirtley did not file his second notice of postconviction relief until January 2015. Therefore, his claims are also untimely. 

Ariz. R. Crim. P. 32.4(a).

¶3 We grant review but deny relief.
# Official Journal L 346/2011

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2011.346.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 346 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5430 December 2011 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2011.346.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 346

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5430 December 2011

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Regulation (EU) No 1388/2011 of 16 December 2011 fixing for the 2012 fishing year the guide prices and Union producer prices for certain fishery products pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 | 1 |
| | * | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1389/2011 of 19 December 2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of trichloroisocyanuric acid originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 | 6 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2011/900/EU |
| | * | Council Decision of 19 December 2011 amending the Council’s Rules of Procedure | 17 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Regulation (EU) No 1388/2011 of 16 December 2011 fixing for the 2012 fishing year the guide prices and Union producer prices for certain fishery products pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 104/2000

1

*

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1389/2011 of 19 December 2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of trichloroisocyanuric acid originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009

6

DECISIONS

2011/900/EU

*

Council Decision of 19 December 2011 amending the Council’s Rules of Procedure

17

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# C_2018235EN.01000301.xml

| 6.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8882 — Kennedy Wilson/AXA/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 235/02)

On 5 June 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8882. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8882. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
1

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-31220

DAVID THERIOT; ET AL

Plaintiffs

BURLINGTON NORTHERN & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO; ET AL

Defendants

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

MARY VILTZ; ET AL

Plaintiffs

ANNA LAWSON

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

BURLINGTON NORTHERN & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO; ET AL

Defendants

BURLINGTON NORTHERN & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO

Defendant - Appellee

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

May 1, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
2

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

PEGGY GERAC; ET AL

Plaintiffs

PEGGY GERAC; FRANCIS GREEN

Plaintiffs - Appellants

v.

BURLINGTON NORTHERN & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO; ET AL

Defendants

BURLINGTON NORTHERN & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO

Defendant - Appellee

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

ETHEL TAYLOR; ET AL

Plaintiffs

ETHEL TAYLOR

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

BURLINGTON NORTHERN & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO; ET AL

Defendants

BURLINGTON NORTHERN & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should

not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in

5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

3

Defendant - Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for

the Western District of Louisiana

(00-CV-1097)

_________________________________________________________

Before REAVLEY, CLEMENT and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Although pro se pleadings are afforded liberal construction, see Haines v,

Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520, 92 S. Ct. 594 (1972), even pro se litigants must

adequately brief arguments in order to properly present them for consideration. See

Yahey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). Appellants have made no

showing of the jurisdiction of this court and have inadequately briefed their

arguments. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. 

APPEAL DISMISSED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

JW BAIN

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NUMBER 4:24-CR-00032

ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY

The Court referred this matter to the United States Magistrate Judge for administration of 

a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a 

hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court accept 

Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment.

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings.

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of 

the United States Magistrate Judge. The court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance 

of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report.

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant JW Bain GUILTY

of Count One of the Indictment, charging a violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(1)(A) – Engaging 

in the Business Without a License (Firearms).

Case 4:24-cr-00032-SDJ-AGD Document 25 Filed 08/26/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 73
# C_2018100EN.01000202.xml

| 16.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8811 — IFM/CDPQ/Conmex)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 100/04)

On 12 March 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8811. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8811. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Jason CORREA, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 18-1519

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Josue MARTINEZ-HERNANDEZ and Oscar Carcamo-Soto, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5835

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.