alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BCTC V Assignor Corp. (the "registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|                  |  |                            
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:             |  |                            
|November 16, 2009 |  | /s/ John P. Manning        
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  | John P. Manning            
|                  |  | Principal Executive Officer
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  |                            



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**CERTIFICATION**

|   | (3) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (4) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                             | /s/                Steve Schaeffer         |   |
|----------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|                             | Steve                Schaeffer             |   |
|                             | Principal                Financial Officer |   |
|                             | Modigene                Inc.               |   |
| November                14, 2008 |                                       |   |

----
E. V., Petitioner v. Eugene H. ROBINSON, Jr., Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Marine Corps, in His Capacity as Military Judge.

No. 18-1400

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 12, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6598

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHARLES JETER GRIFFITH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg,

District Judge. (1:03-cr-00050-LHT; 1:05-cv-263-LHT)

Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 8, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Jeter Griffith, Appellant Pro Se. Jill Westmoreland Rose,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Charles Jeter Griffith seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion.

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Griffith has

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
Cash Income Trust:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements
of Cash Income Trust (the "Trust") for the year ended December
31, 1997, we considered its internal control, including control
activities for safeguarding securities, in order to determine our
auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on
the financial statements and to comply with the requirements of
Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on the internal control.

The management of the Trust is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles. Those controls include the safeguarding of
assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or
irregularities may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection
of any evaluation of internal control to future periods is
subject to the risk that it may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and
operation may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in the internal control that might be
material weaknesses under standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness
is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of
the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively
low level the risk that errors or irregularities in amounts that
would be material in relation to the financial statements being
audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by
employees in the normal course of performing their assigned
functions.  However, we noted no matters involving the internal
control and its operation, including controls for safeguarding
securities that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined
above.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management, the Board of Trustees of the Trust, and the
Securities and Exchange Commission.




February 10, 1998
SMITH BARNEY INVESTMENT FUNDS INC.
GROWTH OPPORTUNITY FUND

Supplement dated December 19, 1997
to Prospectus dated April 30, 1997


	The Board of Directors of Smith Barney 
Investment Funds Inc. has voted to change the name of 
Growth Opportunity Fund, one of the funds making up 
Smith Barney Investment Funds Inc., to Concert 
Peachtree Growth Fund, effective December 19, 1997. 
This name change does not represent a change in either 
investment objective or investment policies.

FD01367
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018232EN.01001701.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 3.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/17 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.8980 — Partners Group/Techem)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 232/06)

1.

On 22 June 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018232EN.01001701-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Partners Group AG (‘Partners Group’, Switzerland), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Techem GmbH (‘Techem’, Germany) |

Partners Group acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Techem.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Partners Group is a global private markets investment management company, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Techem is mainly active in the supply of cost allocation services comprising (i) the supply of sub-meters for residential water and heat; and (ii) the supply of sub-metering services for residential water and heat. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018232EN.01001701-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.8980 — Partners Group/Techem

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018232EN.01001701-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018232EN.01001701-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
[ARTICLE] 6
[CIK] 0000764624
[NAME] PREMIUM TOTAL RETURN - CLASS Y
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   YEAR
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1999
[PERIOD-END]                               DEC-31-1999
[INVESTMENTS-AT-COST]                    2,249,828,328
[INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE]                   2,545,540,829
[RECEIVABLES]                              202,999,800
[ASSETS-OTHER]                                   7,138
[OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS]                                 0
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                           2,748,547,767
[PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES]                    38,935,160
[SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT]                              0
[OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES]                  164,716,707
[TOTAL-LIABILITIES]                        203,651,867
[SENIOR-EQUITY]                                      0
[PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON]                 2,090,115,757
[SHARES-COMMON-STOCK]                        4,722,311
[SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR]                        3,593,024
[ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT]                    7,790,038
[OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII]                               0
[ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS]                    150,069,581
[OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS]                             0
[ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC]                   269,920,524
[NET-ASSETS]                             2,544,895,900
[DIVIDEND-INCOME]                           52,405,887
[INTEREST-INCOME]                           69,371,534
[OTHER-INCOME]                                       0
[EXPENSES-NET]                              49,312,417
[NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME]                     72,465,004
[REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT]                   742,214,274
[APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT]                (693,844,806)
[NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS]                      121,032,472
[EQUALIZATION]                                       0
[DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME]                    2,229,090
[DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS]                    15,977,464
[DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER]                                0
[NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD]                      1,261,008
[NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED]                    131,721
[SHARES-REINVESTED]                                  0
[NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS]                 (1,672,467,200)
[ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR]                      3,257,921
[ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR]                   73,920,269
[OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR]                              0
[OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR]                           0
[GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES]                       24,858,896
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                   0
[GROSS-EXPENSE]                             49,312,417
[AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS]                        85,752,774
[PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN]                            21.49
[PER-SHARE-NII]                                   0.64
[PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC]                           0.48
[PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND]                              0.53
[PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS]                         3.86
[RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL]                              0.00
[PER-SHARE-NAV-END]                              18.22
[EXPENSE-RATIO]                                   0.77
</TABLE>
IN RE Larry POUNCY, Petitioner.

No. 19-6112

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
(logo) Newmark Knight Frank

 

 

225 Franklin Street

18th Floor

Boston, MA 02110

T 877.526.3562

ngkf.com

 

 

**Officer's Certificate**

 

 

I, Ronald Steffenino, a SeniorManaging Director of Servicing and Asset Management of Berkeley Point CapitalLLC d/b/a Newmark Knight Frank, certify for the transactions listed on ScheduleI, to KeyBank, National Association, as Master Servicer under the applicableServicing Agreement (the "Agreement") by and between KeyBank,National Association as Master Servicer, and Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/aNewmark Knight Frank as Servicer (the "Subservicer") and itsofficers, directors and affiliates, and with the knowledge and intent that theywill rely upon this certification (capitalized terms used herein without definitionshall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Sub-Servicing Agreement),that:

 

1. A review of theSubservicer's activities during the preceding calendar year or portion thereofand of the Subservicer's performance under this Agreement, has been made undersuch officer's supervision;

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Subservicer has fulfilled all itsobligations under this Agreement, in all material respects throughout such yearor portion thereof;

 

3. The Subservicer hasmaintained an effective internal control system over the servicing of mortgageloans including the Mortgage Loans; and

 

4. The Subservicer has notreceived any notice regarding qualification or challenging (A) the status ofthe Lower-Tier REMIC or the Upper-Tier REMIC as a REMIC or (B) the GrantorTrust as a "grantor trust" under the Code, from the IRS or any othergovernmental agency or body.

 

This certificate may only berelied upon by the Master Servicer and may not be used, circulated to, or reliedupon by any other person without our express written permission.

 

Date: January 31st,2020

 

 

BERKELEY POINT CAPITAL LLCd/b/a

d/b/a Newark Knight Frank

/s/ Ronald Steffenino

Ronald Steffenino

Senior Managing Director,

Servicing and Asset Management

 

 

**Schedule I**

 

Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates; Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a Newmark KnightFrank as ***Primary Servicer***:

 

 

Series 2014 FL1

Series 2019 CF1
Exhibit F

Case 2:24-cv-00080-JRG Document 46-7 Filed 09/04/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 827
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois N.D.Ill.

0 days 6 years 12 years

Dismiss (Contested)

154 cases

Median: 203 days

0

134

203

340

634

Summary Judgment

51 cases

Median: 899 days

57

509

899

1,453

2,738

Trial

11 cases

Median: 1,937 days

437

1,217

1,937

2,649

4,181

Termination

968 cases

Median: 134 days

1

85

134

252

497

% of cases that

reached event in

less than more than

203 days

49%

4%

0%

67%

51%

96%

100%

33%

0 days 6 years 12 years

Showing 1,215 Patent cases in N.D.Ill.; pending between 2019-08-19 and 2024-08-19.; sorted by most recent docket activity.

Timing

1,215 Federal District Court Cases in N.D.Ill. Page 1 of 2

https://law.lexmachina.com/court/ilnd/cases?case_types-include=27&pending-from=2019-08-19&pending-

- Lex Machina 

■ 

J 

I 

•• L __ 

• _ _ __J -

I 

I 

Case 2:24-cv-00080-JRG Document 46-7 Filed 09/04/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 828
Event Cases Reaching Event Median Days from Case Filing to Order

Temporary Restraining Order (Grant) 426 13

Temporary Restraining Order (Deny) 3 n/a

Preliminary Injunction (Grant) 358 41

Preliminary Injunction (Deny) 8 n/a

Permanent Injunction (Grant) 341 105

Claim Construction Hearing 44 734

1,215 Federal District Court Cases in N.D.Ill. Page 2 of 2

https://law.lexmachina.com/court/ilnd/cases?case_types-include=27&pending-from=2019-08-19&pending-

- Lex Machina 

Case 2:24-cv-00080-JRG Document 46-7 Filed 09/04/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 829
Travelers Series Fund Inc.

On behalf of the

Travelers Managed Income Portfolio (the "Portfolio")

Supplement Dated December 3, 1998
to
Prospectus Dated February 27, 1998



	On November 24, 1998, shareholders of the Portfolio of the 
Travelers Series Fund Inc. (the "Fund") approved a new management 
agreement between the Fund on behalf the Portfolio and Travelers 
Asset Management International Corporation ("TAMIC").  

	Effective December 1, 1998, TAMIC will assume all of the 
duties previously performed by Travelers Investment Adviser, 
Inc., the Portfolio's manager, and The Boston Company Asset 
Management, Inc. the Portfolio's sub-adviser. Also the Board of 
Directors of the Fund have voted to change the name of the 
Portfolio to the Travelers Managed Income Portfolio from the TBC 
Managed Income Portfolio to be effective on December 1, 1998, 
with the assumption by TAMIC of the management of the Portfolio. 





FD 01577




U:\LEGAL\FUNDS\$STS\1998\SECDOCS\1298stk1.doc
George E. BROWN, Jr., Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6221

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 12, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

## Filings in Existing Proceedings

*Docket Numbers:*                     RP22-976-000.                

*Applicants:*                     Gulfstream Natural Gas System, L.L.C.                

*Description:*                     Compliance filing: Phase VI Expansion Project In-Service Filing CP19-475-000 to be effective 7/15/2022.                

*Filed Date:*                     6/10/22.                

*Accession Number:*                     20220610-5032.                

*Comment Date:*                     5 p.m. ET 6/22/22.                

                    Any person desiring to protest in any the above proceedings must file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date.  The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system (                    *https://elibrary.ferc.gov/​idmws/​search/​fercgensearch.asp*) by querying the docket number.  eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying facilities filings can be found at:                    *http://www.ferc.gov/​docs-filing/​efiling/​filing-req.pdf.*                     For other information, call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                

Dated: June 10, 2022.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2022-12994 Filed 6-15-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT INDYMAC FEDERAL SAVINGS ) BANK, FSB, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D14-1010 ) FRANK J. NABOZNY, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ ) Opinion filed February 10, 2016. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Jack Day, Judge. Manuel S. Hiraldo and Paul J. Sodhi of Blank Rome LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellant. Roger O. Mills of Mills Law, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.

NORTHCUTT, Judge. IndyMac Federal Savings Bank, FSB, appeals a final summary ju dgment dismissing its foreclosure clai m against Frank Nabozny based on the court's conclusion that the bank's notice of default letter did not comply with th e requirements of the mortgage. We conclude that IndyMac's letter substantially comp lied with its notice obligations under the mortgage terms and thus was sufficient. See Green Tree- 2 - Servicing, LLC v. Milam, 40 Fla. L. Weekly D1733 (Fla. 2d DCA J uly 29, 2015). Accordingly, we reverse the summary judgment and remand for fur ther proceedings. Reversed and remanded.

LaROSE and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.