alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000873637
<NAME> European Portfolio
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER>003
   <NAME>Smith Barney World Funds, Inc.

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 Oct-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                      Oct-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>              60,118,782
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>             97,980,281
<RECEIVABLES>                       2,973,861
<ASSETS-OTHER>                     12,931,600
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    113,885,742
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                    0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>          13,221,036
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                13,221,036
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                             0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>           56,718,579
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>               1,844,742
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>               1,414,848
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                   0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                      0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>             6,086,897
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                    0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>           37,859,230
<NET-ASSETS>                      100,664,706
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                   1,226,392
<INTEREST-INCOME>                     188,064
<OTHER-INCOME>                              0
<EXPENSES-NET>                      1,961,302
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>              (546,846)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>            6,634,890
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>          12,866,643
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>              18,954,687
<EQUALIZATION>                              0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                   0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>            1,646,466
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                       0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>            28,890,006
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>        28,521,841
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                    61,729
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>             19,547,108
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                     0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>           4,139,408
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                     0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                  0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                 906,567
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                     1,961,302
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>               47,473,860
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                  22.580
<PER-SHARE-NII>                        (0.010)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                 4.080
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                    0.000
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>               1.130
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                    0.000
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                    25.520
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                          1.46



</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-11134 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JANET LENELL EASTER, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:00-CR-241-1-A

-------------------- April 11, 2002 Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Janet Lenell Easter appeals her conviction following entry of a guilty plea to a charge of possession with intent to distribute more than fifty grams of cocaine base. Easter contends that the district court participated in the plea negotiations in violation of F ED . R. C RIM . P. 11(e)(1). Rule 11, F ED . R. C RIM . P., requires the district court to participate actively in discussions after a plea agreement has been disclosed. United States v. Crowell , 60 F.3d 199, 203 (5th Cir. 1995). However, F ED . R. C RIM . P. 11(e)(1) absolutelyNo. 01-11134 -2- prohibits a district court from participating in or interfering with plea negotiations. Id. Although the district court may state reasons for accepting or rejecting a plea agreement, it may not suggest plea agreements that might be acceptable. Id. The district court’s post guilty plea consideration of the potential sentence Easter faced under the plea agreement as compared to the punishment that Easter would have faced for her conduct as a whole did not constitute participation in plea negotiations in violation of F ED . R. C RIM . P. 11(e)(1). See Crowell , 60 F.3d at 203-04. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Amendment to Employment Agreement between David E. Hooston and the Registrant



 EXHIBIT 10.11 
  
 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of October 28, 2003 by
and between FIRST CALIFORNIA BANCSHARES, a California corporation (“Company”) and DAVID E. HOOSTON (“Executive”) (collectively sometimes referred to as the “Parties”): 
  
 WHEREAS, the Parties entered into an Employment Agreement
(“Agreement”) effective January 1, 2003; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Parties intend by this Amendment to amend the Agreement as set forth hereinbelow: 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 
  
 1. Section 2(b)(iii) of the Agreement is amended to read in full as follows, effective as of the date hereof: 
  
 (iii) General Expenses. The Company shall, upon
submission and approval of written statements and bills in accordance with the then-regular procedures of the Company, pay or reimburse the Executive for any and all necessary, customary and usual expenses (including entertainment) incurred by the
Executive while traveling for or on behalf of the Company, and any and all other necessary, customary or usual expenses incurred by the Executive for or on behalf of the Company in the normal course of business, as determined to be appropriate by
the Company. In addition, the Company shall, upon submission and approval of written statements and bills in accordance with the then-regular procedures of the Company, pay or reimburse the Executive for any and all necessary, customary and usual
expenses incurred by the Executive while traveling between the Principal Office and Orange County. 
  
 2. Section 2(b)(iv) of the Agreement is amended to read in full as follows, effective as of the date hereof: 
  
 (iv) Automobile and Automobile Expense. Company shall
provide Executive with the use of a Company-owned car. In addition, Company shall pay the amounts charged by Executive for fuel for business related travel on a credit card provided by Bank to Executive. So long as Company shall provide Executive
with such car, Company shall procure and maintain an automobile liability insurance policy on the automobile, with coverage including the Executive for at least $100,000 for bodily injury or death to any one person, $300,000 for bodily injury or
death in any one accident, and $50,000 for property damage in any one accident. 







 3. All other terms of the Agreement remain in full force and effect. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is entered into as of the date and your
above written. 
  

									
	 “COMPANY”
 FIRST
CALIFORNIA BANCSHARES
  
	 	 	 	“EXECUTIVE”
					
	By:	 	/s/    Robert J. Kushner,	 	 	 	 	 	/s/    David E. Hooston
	 	 	
	 	 	 	 	 	

	 	 	 Robert J. Kushner,
 Chairman of the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors
	 	 	 	 	 	 DAVID E. HOOSTON
Willie Carl JONES, Petitioner, v. Darrel VANNOY, Warden.

No. 18-9571

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Thomas Arthur KAHLOW, Petitioner v. FLORIDA;

No. 19-5313

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 114 (Tuesday, June 14, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35862-35863]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12784]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD

10 CFR Part 1707

[Docket No. DNFSB-2022-0001]


Testimony by DNFSB Employees and Production of Official Records 
in Legal Proceedings

AGENCY: Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB or Board) 
is confirming the effective date of July 14, 2022, for the direct final 
rule that was published in the Federal Register on April 15, 2022. The 
direct final rule revised the Board's Touhy regulations to clarify that 
they only apply when the United States or DNFSB is not a party in the 
underlying legal proceeding.

DATES: The effective date of July 14, 2022, for the direct final rule 
published April 15, 2022 (87 FR 22436), is confirmed.

ADDRESSES: DNFSB's General Counsel Web page: Go to https://www.dnfsb.gov/office-general-counsel and click ``Rulemaking-DNFSB-2022-
0001'' to access publicly available information related to this 
rulemaking.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric Fox, Associate General Counsel, 
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana Avenue NW, Suite 
700, Washington, DC 20004-2901, (202) 694-7000.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 15, 2022 (87 FR 22436), the DNFSB 
published a direct final rule amending its regulations in part 1707 of 
title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations regarding testimony by 
DNFSB employees and production of documents in legal proceedings. The 
DNFSB published this direct final rule

[[Page 35863]]

to clarify that the regulations do not apply to legal proceedings in 
which the DNFSB or United States is not a party.
    In the direct final rule, the DNFSB stated that if no significant 
adverse comments were received, the direct final rule would become 
effective on July 14, 2022. The DNFSB received no comments, and the 
direct final rule will become effective as scheduled.

    Dated: June 9, 2022.
Joyce Connery,
Chair.
[FR Doc. 2022-12784 Filed 6-13-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3670-01-P
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 12/31/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      349,696
COMMITMENTS
 113,282  153,274   77,969  139,181   95,542  330,432  326,785   19,264   22,911

CHANGES FROM 12/24/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -4,577)
   1,640    3,507   -5,735     -575   -2,912   -4,670   -5,140       93      563

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    32.4     43.8     22.3     39.8     27.3     94.5     93.4      5.5      6.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      155)
      50       54       60       33       30      115      125
```

----

Updated January 6, 2014
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 470 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 470

 Designating July 28, 2012, as ``National Day of the American Cowboy''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 2012

  Mr. Enzi (for himself, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Baucus, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. 
Conrad, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Hoeven, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Johanns, Mr. Johnson of 
    South Dakota, Mr. Merkley, Mr. Reid, Mr. Risch, and Mr. Tester) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                            on the Judiciary

                             June 18, 2012

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating July 28, 2012, as ``National Day of the American Cowboy''.

Whereas pioneering men and women, recognized as ``cowboys'', helped establish 
        the American West;
Whereas the cowboy embodies honesty, integrity, courage, compassion, respect, a 
        strong work ethic, and patriotism;
Whereas the cowboy spirit exemplifies strength of character, sound family 
        values, and good common sense;
Whereas the cowboy archetype transcends ethnicity, gender, geographic 
        boundaries, and political affiliations;
Whereas the cowboy is an excellent steward of the land and its creatures, who 
        lives off the land and works to protect and enhance the environment;
Whereas cowboy traditions have been a part of American culture for generations;
Whereas the cowboy continues to be an important part of the economy through the 
        work of many thousands of ranchers across the United States who 
        contribute to the economic well-being of every State;
Whereas millions of fans watch professional and working ranch rodeo events 
        annually, making rodeo one of the most-watched sports in the United 
        States;
Whereas membership and participation in rodeo and other organizations that 
        promote and encompass the livelihood of cowboys span every generation 
        and transcend race and gender;
Whereas the cowboy is a central figure in literature, film, and music and 
        occupies a central place in the public imagination;
Whereas the cowboy is an American icon; and
Whereas the ongoing contributions made by cowboys and cowgirls to their 
        communities should be recognized and encouraged: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates July 28, 2012, as ``National Day of the 
        American Cowboy''; and
            (2) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        the day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
                                 <all>
```
DISMISS ; and Opinion Filed September 20, 2013. 

# S

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 00970

- CV

DOMINGO GARCIA , Appellant

V.

THE LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 13

- 03571

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, Fillmore, and Lewis Opinion by Justice Lewis

Before the Court is appellant’s un opposed motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant has

informed the Court that the issues in this appeal are now moot. Accordingly, we grant

appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1).

130970F.P05 /David Lewis/

DAVID LEWIS

JUSTICE– 2

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

DOMINGO GARCIA, Appellant

No. 05

- 13

- 00970

- CV V.

THE LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN
AMERICAN CITIZENS, Appellee On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District

Court, Dallas County, Texas.

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 13

- 03571.
Opinion delivered by Justice Lewis.
Justices Bridges and Fillmore, participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.

It is ORDERED that appellee, TH E LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, recover its costs of this appeal from appellant, DOMINGO GARCIA.

Judgment entered this 20 th day of September, 2013.

/David Lewis/

DAVID LEWIS

JUSTICE
1... This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2007-CI-13110, pending in the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar

County, Texas, the Honorable Larry Noll presiding. However, the challenged order was signed by the Honorable

Michael Peden, presiding judge of the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas. 

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00055-CV

IN RE William James JONAS, III

Original Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 10, 2010

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS DENIED

On January 21, 2010, relator William James Jonas, III filed a petition for writ of habeas

corpus, seeking relief from the trial court’s December 11, 2009 “Second Order for Commitment in

the Bexar County Jail.” The court has considered relator’s petition and the real party in interest’s

response and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the

petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). We revoke relator’s

bond and remand him to the custody of the Sheriff of Bexar County, Texas in accordance with the

trial court’s December 11, 2009 “Second Order for Commitment in the Bexar County Jail.” 

PER CURIAM
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

Whitehorn Construction, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 63606

)

Under Contract No. N62473-16-C-3324 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Edward W. O’Connell, Jr., Esq.

 Lake Elsinore, CA

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Craig D. Jensen, Esq.

 Navy Chief Trial Attorney

Katherine E. Arutunian, Esq.

 Trial Attorney

 San Diego, CA

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE THRASHER

The parties have resolved their dispute and request that the Board enter judgment 

in favor of appellant.

It is the Board’s decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. §§ 7105(e), 7108(b), and the 

parties’ stipulation and agreement, that the appeal is sustained. In the nature of a consent 

judgment, the Board makes a monetary award to appellant in the amount of $460,517. 

This amount is inclusive of interest. No further interest shall be paid.

Dated: August 30, 2023

JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

(Signatures continued)
2

I concur

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD

Administrative Judge

Vice Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

I concur

OWEN C. WILSON

Administrative Judge

Vice Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63606, Appeal of Whitehorn 

Construction, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: August 31, 2023

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           7,313
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,457
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,013
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,448
<PP&E>                                         204,147
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,514
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 232,838
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,351
<BONDS>                                        160,961
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         29
<COMMON>                                            38
<OTHER-SE>                                      67,459
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   232,838
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,783
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,951
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,730
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,315
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,213)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,250)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,250)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.56)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 35.1



ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE



Synchrony Bank (the “Servicer”) hereby
certifies as of December 31, 2022 as follows:



| | 1. | The undersigned has reviewed, for the period beginning January 1, 2022 and ending December 31, 2022: (a) the activities of the Servicer
as they related to the Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2018, between Synchrony Card Issuance Trust and the
Servicer (the “Servicing Agreement”) and (b) the Servicer’s performance under the Servicing Agreement. Such review
of the activities of the Servicer and the performance by the Servicer of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement has been made by
persons under the direct supervision of the undersigned.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best knowledge of the undersigned, based on my review of the Servicer’s performance under the Servicing Agreement, the
Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects for the period beginning January
1, 2022 and ending December 31, 2022.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This report is delivered pursuant to Item
1123 of Regulation AB.



| | SYNCHRONY BANK
| | --------------
| |               
| | By:           
| | Name:         
| | Title:        



SYNIT: Bank Compliance Certificate