alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1078 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1078

   To make participation in the American Community Survey voluntary, 
except with respect to certain basic questions, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 12, 2013

    Mr. Poe of Texas (for himself, Mr. Lamborn, Mr. Duncan of South 
 Carolina, Mr. Jones, Mr. Huelskamp, Mr. Chaffetz, Mr. Sam Johnson of 
   Texas, Mr. Scalise, Mr. Walberg, Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia, Mr. 
  Gowdy, Mr. Fortenberry, Mr. Culberson, Mr. Hall, Mrs. Ellmers, Mr. 
 Latta, and Mr. Luetkemeyer) introduced the following bill; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To make participation in the American Community Survey voluntary, 
except with respect to certain basic questions, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PARTICIPATION IN AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY.

    (a) Optional Questions.--Section 193 of title 13, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: ``The Secretary 
shall include, in the instructions for completing any survey authorized 
under this section, a statement indicating that answering any question 
other than questions that solicit the information described in section 
221(c)(2)(A) is optional.''.
    (b) Refusal To Participate.--Section 221 of title 13, United States 
Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``Whoever, being over 
        eighteen years of age,'' and inserting ``Except as provided in 
        subsection (c), any person older than 18 years of age who''; 
        and
            (2) by amending subsection (c) to read as follows:
    ``(c)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision under this title--
            ``(A) no person may be compelled to disclose information 
        relative to the person's religious beliefs or to membership in 
        a religious body; and
            ``(B) except as provided in paragraph (2), no person may be 
        fined or otherwise compelled to answer questions in connection 
        with the survey, conducted by the Secretary of Commerce, which 
        is commonly referred to as the `American Community Survey'.
    ``(2) Paragraph (1)(B)--
            ``(A) shall not apply to any question that elicits--
                    ``(i) the name of the respondent;
                    ``(ii) contact information for the respondent;
                    ``(iii) the date of the response; or
                    ``(iv) the number of people living or staying at 
                the same address; and
            ``(B) does not waive any penalty imposed for conduct 
        described in subsection (b).''.
                                 <all>
```
### M A N D A T E

TO THE 103RD DISTRICT COURT of CAMERON COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 11th day of

June, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

MI GWANG CONTACT LENS CO.,

LTD. AND CLEARLAB US, INC., Appellants,

v.

M. TERRI CAVAZOS CHAPA,

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT

FRIEND AND NATURAL GUARDIAN

OF VICTORIA CHAPA, A MINOR Appellee.

CAUSE NO. 13-13-00306-CV (Tr.Ct.No. 2012-DCL-1429-D)

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED

. The Court

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged

against appellants.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

      

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals

for the Thirteenth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Rogelio Valdez, Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals, with the seal

thereof affixed, at the City of Edinburg, Texas this 27th day of August, 2015.

Cecile Foy Gsanger, CLERK
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018281EN.01002201.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 10.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/22 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.8990 — PIAG/MTIB/Abatec)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 281/08)

1.

On 1 August 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018281EN.01002201-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Pierer Industrie AG (‘PIAG’, Austria), controlled by Pierer Konzerngesellschaft mbH (‘Pierer’, Austria), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Michael Tojner Industriebeteiligungs und -beratungs GmbH (‘MTIB’, Austria), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Abatec group AG (‘Abatec’, Austria). |

PIAG and MTIB acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of Abatec.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for PIAG and Pierer: production of motorcycles, automotive suppliers, metallurgy, head displays for motorcycle helmets,

—   for MTIB: energy storage, aerospace components, metaltech and industrial components,

—   for Abatec: electronics production, local position measurement systems and high performance carbonators

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018281EN.01002201-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.8990 — PIAG/MTIB/Abatec

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018281EN.01002201-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018281EN.01002201-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/03/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       81,039
COMMITMENTS
     495   15,824    2,624   77,904   62,400   81,023   80,848       16      191

CHANGES FROM 05/27/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      5,629)
     -33      939      215    5,431    4,472    5,613    5,626       16        3

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     0.6     19.5      3.2     96.1     77.0    100.0     99.8      0.0      0.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       41)
       2       12        5       13       26       20       38`

---

Updated June 6, 2014
# C_2018454EN.01000101.xml

| 17.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 454/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 454/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9010 — JAB/Pret A Manger)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 454/01)

On 5 September 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9010. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9010. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Leland DUDLEY, Petitioner v. ILLINOIS

No. 19-5034

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT RULES**

 

I, William P. Brick,certify that:

 

1.       Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc.;

 

2.       Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.       Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)      Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)      Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)      Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a)      Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

b)      Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date:   November 10, 2004 |                                      |
|--------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                           |                                      |
|                           | /s/  WILLIAM P. BRICK           |
|                           | William P. Brick, Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION






<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 32.1

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Atomic Paintball,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  September 30, 2010 as filed with
the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report") I,
Don Mark Dominey,  Principal  Executive  Officer, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company and Principal  Accounting Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: November  22, 2010

Don Mark Dominey
---------------------------------------------------------
Don Mark Dominey, (Principal Executive Officer,
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 31.1

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Clive Barwin, certify that:
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Melt Inc.; |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------|

2.            Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.            Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.             I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and I have:

a)             designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)            evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c)             disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

5.             I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)             all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)            any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: August 8, 2006

 

/s/ Clive Barwin                                                                            

Clive Barwin, President, CEO and Secretary 

(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
Kelvin MILES, Petitioner v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

No. 19-6322

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
MANAGED MUNICIPALS PORTFOLIO INC.
                          10f-3 REPORT
             July 1, 1997 through September 30, 1997
                                

                                                       % of
               Trade                         Par       Purchase
Fund % of
Issuer              Date Selling Dealer      Amount         Price
Assets    Issue

Allegheny PA Airport     8/8/97    Morgan Stanley      $1,000,000
$94.852        0.22%     2.55%
5.000% due 1/1/2019

Washington St. Pub. Power     9/11/97   Goldman, Sachs & Co.
2,000,000   98.296       0.47 3.59
5.125% due 7/1/2011

Houston, TX Water & Sewer     9/18/97   Merrill Lynch
2,000,000   93.963       0.44 3.44
5.000% due 12/1/2025
Exhibit 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  each of the  undersigned  officers  of  GreenShift
Corporation (the "Company"), certifies that:

     1.   The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10Q of the Company for the period ended
          September 30, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
          of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15
          U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




                                /S/      KEVIN KREISLER
                                ------------------------------------
Dated :  November 23, 2009               KEVIN KREISLER
                                         Chief Executive Officer

                                /S/      EDWARD R. CARROLL
                                ------------------------------------
                                         EDWARD R. CARROLL
                                         Chief Financial Officer


This  certification  is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,
subject  to the  knowledge  standard  contained  therein,  and not for any other
purpose.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarter Report of Atomic Paintball, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Darren Dunckel, President/Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Atomic Paintball, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Darren Dunckel


Darren Dunckel


President/Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer





Date:  August 14, 2014
Kristanalea DYROFF, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Wesley Greer, Petitioner, v. ULTIMATE SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.

No. 19-849.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# C_2018270EN.01000101.xml

| 1.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/1

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case M.8677 — Siemens/Alstom)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 270/01)

On 13 July 2018, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the abovementioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the internal market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference No M.8677 — Siemens/Alstom, to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---