alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Clive Barwin, President, CEO and Secretary of Melt Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Melt Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 10, 2004

/s/ Clive Barwin	Clive Barwin, President, CEO, Secretary and Director
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000810271
<NAME> Smith Barney Large Cap Core Fund
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER>002
   <NAME>Smith Barney Investment Series

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  Oct-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                       Oct-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>            3,564,968,888
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>           5,728,815,784
<RECEIVABLES>                       10,556,014
<ASSETS-OTHER>                         382,677
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   5,739,754,475
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>             7,599,567
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                      0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>            7,380,922
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                 14,980,489
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                              0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>         3,066,473,335
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                    6,819
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                        0
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>            7,203,587
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                       0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>            483,924,158
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                     0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>         2,167,172,906
<NET-ASSETS>                     5,724,773,986
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                   39,605,738
<INTEREST-INCOME>                   16,577,758
<OTHER-INCOME>                               0
<EXPENSES-NET>                      47,640,059
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>              8,543,437
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>           487,097,337
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>          329,699,645
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>              825,340,419
<EQUALIZATION>                               0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                    0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                     0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                        0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                  6,819
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                  0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                          0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>             548,966,582
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>             11,654,093
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>          331,038,916
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                      0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                   0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>               31,264,546
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                     47,640,059
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                    72,048
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                   27.330
<PER-SHARE-NII>                         (0.010)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                 (0.910)
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                     0.000
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                0.000
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                     0.000
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                     26.410
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                           1.54



</TABLE>
In the MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF Steven Anthony LANG

No. D-3051

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Disbarment order entered.
# C_2018290EN.01000201.xml

| 17.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 290/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 290/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9033 — Clearlake Capital Group/Vista/Eagleview Technology Corporation)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 290/03)

On 3 August 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9033. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9033. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q REPORTOFREDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC.PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(CHAPTER 63, TITLE 18 U.S.C. SS.SS. 1350(a) AND (b))**

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350(a) and(b)), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2006 of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc.(the ‘‘Company’’) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: November 2, 2006                   |
|-----------------------------------------------|
| /s/ STEVEN J. JANUSEK                         |   |
| Steven J. Janusek, *Chief  Financial Officer* |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63,Title 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350(a) and (b)), is not a part of the Form 10-Qto which it refers and is, to the extent permitted by law, provided by theabove signatory to the extent of his knowledge.

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by ReddyIce Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1005 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1005

   To deauthorize appropriation of funds, and to rescind unobligated 
appropriations, to carry out the Patient Protection and Affordable Care 
   Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 2013

  Mr. Graves of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Westmoreland, Mr. Duncan of 
 South Carolina, and Mr. Collins of Georgia) introduced the following 
 bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and 
  in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, Education and the 
Workforce, the Judiciary, Natural Resources, and House Administration, 
for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 
for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 
                        the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To deauthorize appropriation of funds, and to rescind unobligated 
appropriations, to carry out the Patient Protection and Affordable Care 
   Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Defund Obamacare Act''.

SEC. 2. DEAUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS TO CARRY OUT PPACA AND HCERA.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no funds are authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out the provisions of the Patient 
Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148), the Health 
Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-152), and 
any amendment made by either such Act.

SEC. 3. RESCISSION OF UNOBLIGATED APPROPRIATIONS UNDER PPACA AND HCERA.

    Of the funds made available under any provision of the Patient 
Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148), the Health 
Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-152), and 
any amendment made by either such Act, the unobligated balance is 
rescinded.
                                 <all>
```
Independent Auditors' Report



To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees
of Consulting Group Capital Markets Funds:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements of the Multi-
Strategy Market Neutral Investments of Consulting Group Capital Markets Funds
(the "Fund") for the year ended March 31, 2001, we considered its internal
control, including control activities for safeguarding securities, in order to
determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on
the financial statements and to comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR,
not to provide assurance on internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and maintaining
internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments
by management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs
of controls.  Generally, controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the
entity's objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. Those controls include the
safeguarding of assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, error or fraud may occur
and not be detected.  Also, projection of any evaluation of internal control
to future periods is subject to the risk that it may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily disclose all
matters in internal control that might be material weaknesses under standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A
material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of one or
more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low
level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in amounts that
would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited may
occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal
course of performing their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters
involving internal control and its operation, including controls for
safeguarding securities, that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined
above as of March 31, 2001.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of management, the
Board of Trustees of the Fund, and the Securities and Exchange Commission and
is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these
specified parties.




New York, New York
May 8, 2001
Jeremy S. COCHRAN, Petitioner v. MARYLAND

No. 19-6133

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland denied.
Report of Independent Accountants

To the Shareholders and Board of
Directors of
Salomon Brothers Capital Fund Inc


In planning and
performing our audit
 of the financial statements of
 Salomon
 Brothers Capital Fund Inc
 (the "Fund")
 for the year ended
December 31, 2001,
 we considered their
 internal control,
 including control activities
 for
safeguarding
securities, in order to
 determine our auditing
procedures for
 the purpose of expressing
 our opinion
 on the financial statements
and to
comply with the requirements
 of Form
 N-SAR, not to provide
assurance on
 internal control.

The management of the Fund is
responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In
 fulfilling this responsibility,
 estimates
 and judgments by management are
required to assess
the expected benefits
 and related costs of
 controls.  Generally,
 controls that are
relevant to an audit
 pertain to the
 entity's objective of
preparing financial
statements for
 external purposes that
are fairly
 presented in conformity
 with generally
 accepted accounting principles.
  Those controls include the
safeguarding
 of assets against
unauthorized acquisition,
 use or disposition.
Because of inherent
limitations in internal
 control, errors or fraud
may occur and not
 be detected.  Also,
 projection of any
evaluation of internal
control to future
 periods is subject to
the risk that controls
 may become inadequate
because of changes
 in conditions or that the
 effectiveness of the
 design and operation
may deteriorate.
Our consideration of
Internal control
 would not necessarily
 disclose all matters
 in internal control
 that might be material
 weaknesses under
standards established
 by the American
Institute of Certified
 Public Accountants.
 A material
 weakness is a
condition in which the
 design or operation
 of one or more of
 the internal control
 components does
not reduce to a
relatively low level the
 risk that
 misstatements caused by error
 or fraud in amounts
that would be
 material in relation
to the financial
statements being
audited may occur
and not be detected
within a timely
period by employees
in the normal
course of performing
their assigned
functions.  However,
 we noted no matters
 involving internal control
and its operation,
 including controls for
 safeguarding
securities, that we
consider to be material
 weaknesses as defined
above as of
December 31, 2001.
This report is intended
solely for the
 information and use of
 management and
 the Board of Directors of
the Fund and the
 Securities and Exchange
 Commission and
 is not intended to be and
should not be used
by anyone other than these
specified parties.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

February 19, 2002

To the Shareholders and
 Board of Directors of
Salomon Brothers Capital Fund Inc


	(4)
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., petitioner, v. George W. JACKSON.

No. 17-1471.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 5, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**New Holland Credit Company, LLC**

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of New Holland Credit Company, LLC (“NHCC”), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2017 (as amended from time to time, the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) by and among NHCC, CNH Capital Receivables LLC and CNH Equipment Trust 2017-C, does hereby certify that:

 

1.                                      NHCC is Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

 

2.                                      The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Indenture Trustee.

 

3.                                      This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 4.9(a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 

4.                                      A review of the Servicer’s activities during the period from the trust’s initial cut-off date,  October 31, 2017, to and including December 31, 2017 and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

5.                                      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the period from the trust’s initial cut-off date, October 31, 2017, to and including December 31, 2017.

 

6.                                      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 27th day of March, 2018.

 

----

 

March 27, 2018

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Brett D. Davis |
|--------|--------|--------------------|
|   | Name:  | Brett D. Davis     |
|   | Title: | President          |

 

----
Anthony ANDREWS, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6639

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 16, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Serah Njoki KARINGITHI, Petitioner, v. William P. BARR, Attorney General.

No. 19-475

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Pablo Enrique ROSADO-SANCHEZ, Petitioner v. PUERTO RICO DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, et al.

No. 19-6098

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
D.R., Petitioner v. M.R., et al.

No. 18-9599

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

March 22, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00129

- CV

S tanton P. BELL, et al., Appellants/Cross

- Appellees

,

v.

CHESAPEAKE EXPLORATION, LLC, Appellee/Cross

- Appellant,

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CI22093 Honorable Cathleen M. Stryker, J udge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice

After reviewing the appellees/cross

- appellants’ motion for extension of time to file motion for rehearing and plaintiff

- appellants/cross

- appellees’ response in opposition of the motion, the motion is GRANTED IN PART

. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED . Appellees/cross

- appellants’ motion of rehearing must be filed by April 19 , 2019.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affix ed the seal of the said court on this 22nd day of March, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
Edward L. COLLINS, Petitioner v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 19-6390

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC.  PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  (CHAPTER 98, TITLE 15 U.S.C. SS. 7241)

I,
Steven J. Janusek, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13(a)-15(f) and
15(d)-15(f)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



Date:
November 7, 2008

|                                                                 |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ STEVEN J. JANUSEK Steven J. Janusek,
Chief Financial Officer |  | 

---



QuickLinks
Kirk SAINTCALLE, Petitioner, v. Jeffrey A. UTTECHT, Warden.

No. 19-5591

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Cairo LOPEZ, Jr., Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5622

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Amon Rweyemamu MTAZA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6698.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for rehearing denied.