alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

RAFAEL PAHUA MARTINEZ, a.k.a.

Miguel Pahua Martinez, a.k.a. Enrique

Pahua Montano,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 18

- 10102

D.C. No. 2:15

- cr

- 00140

- MCE

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Morrison C. England, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 15, 2019 **

Before: TROTT, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN , Circuit Judges.

Rafael Pahua Martinez appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty

- plea conviction and 252

- month sentence for conspiracy to

distribute and to possess with intent to distribute metham phetamine , in violation of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JAN 18 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 18

- 10102

21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738

(1967), Martinez ’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for

relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided

Martinez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se

supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Martinez waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our

independent review of the record pursuant t o Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80

(1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United

States v. Watson , 582 F.3d 974, 986

- 88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss

the appeal. See id. at 988.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1081 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1081

To require that all foreign terrorists with links to terrorist networks 
  who attack the United States or its Government be considered enemy 
   combatants to be tried by military tribunals instead of civilian 
                                courts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 12, 2013

 Mr. Buchanan (for himself, Mr. Duncan of Tennessee, Mr. McKinley, Mr. 
Rooney, Mr. Latta, and Mr. Bachus) introduced the following bill; which 
was referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the 
Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined 
 by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as 
        fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require that all foreign terrorists with links to terrorist networks 
  who attack the United States or its Government be considered enemy 
   combatants to be tried by military tribunals instead of civilian 
                                courts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Tribunals for Terrorists 
Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. TRIAL OF FOREIGN TERRORISTS.

    After the date of the enactment of this Act, any foreign national, 
who--
            (1) engages or has engaged in conduct constituting an 
        offense relating to a terrorist attack against persons or 
        property in the United States or against any United States 
        Government property or personnel outside the United States; and
            (2) is subject to trial for that offense by a military 
        commission under chapter 47A of title 10, United States Code;
shall be tried for that offense only by a military commission under 
that chapter.
                                 <all>
```
CALIFORNIA TROUT, et al., Petitioners v. HOOPA VALLEY TRIBE, et al.

No. 19-257

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Justice Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Todd J. TIBBS, Petitioner, v. Randy GROUNDS, Warden.

No. 19-5332

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 02/19/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      195,263
COMMITMENTS
  38,245   33,662   33,845  101,134   98,054  173,224  165,561   22,039   29,702

CHANGES FROM 02/12/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,521)
     145    2,331     -945     -256   -2,219   -1,056     -834     -465     -687

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    19.6     17.2     17.3     51.8     50.2     88.7     84.8     11.3     15.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      194)
      53       44       51       68       79      145      155
```

----

Updated February 22, 2013
EXHIBIT 32.a

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund V L.P. (the "Fund") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer of the Fund's general partner, Boston Capital Associates V, L.L.C., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                  
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.



|                  |  |                            
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:             |  |                            
|February 14, 2011 |  | /s/ John P. Manning        
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  | John P. Manning            
|                  |  | Principal Executive Officer
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  |                            



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Kevin K. MCALEENAN, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, et al., Petitioners, v. Martin Jonathan Batalla VIDAL, et al.

No. 18-589

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 1, 2019

A total of 80 minutes is allotted for oral argument, and the time is divided as follows: 40 minutes for the Solicitor General, 20 minutes for private respondents, and 20 minutes for state respondent.
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIESEXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Edward Goldthorpe, certify that: 

 
1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of BC PartnersLending Corporation; 

 
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to statea material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 
 (a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant [, including its consolidated subsidiaries,] is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

 
 (b)
[Reserved]; 

 
 (c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 
 (d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 

 
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 
 (a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 
 (b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant rolein the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: February 7, 2019 

 

/s/ Edward Goldthorpe
Edward Goldthorpe*Chief Executive Officer***
To The Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
Smith Barney Income Funds:

In planning and performing our audits of the financial
statements of the Smith Barney High Income Fund of Smith
Barney Income Funds (the "Fund") for the year ended July 31,
1997, we considered its internal control structure,
including procedures for safeguarding securities, in order
to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of
expressing our opinion on the financial statements and to
comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide
assurance on the internal control structure.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing
and maintaining an internal control structure.  In
fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments by
management are required to assess the expected benefits and
related costs of internal control structure policies and
procedures.  Two of the objectives of an internal control
structure are to provide management with reasonable, but not
absolute, assurance that assets are safeguarded against loss
from unauthorized use or disposition and that transactions
are executed in accordance with management's authorization
and recorded properly to permit preparation of financial
statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.

Because of inherent limitations in any internal control
structure, errors or irregularities may occur and not be
detected.  Also, projection of any evaluation of the
structure to future periods is subject to the risk that it
may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or
that the effectiveness of the design and operation may
deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control structure would
not necessarily disclose all matters in the internal control
structure that might be material weaknesses under standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants.  A material weakness is a condition in which
the design or operation of the specific internal control
structure elements does not reduce to a relatively low level
the risk that errors or irregularities in amounts that would
be material in relation to the financial statements being
audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period
by employees in the normal course of performing their
assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters involving
the internal control structure, including procedures for
safeguarding securities, that we consider to be material
weaknesses as defined above as of July 31, 1997.

This report is intended solely for the information and use
of management and the Securities and Exchange Commission.




September 15, 1997
# C_2018454EN.01000201.xml

| 17.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 454/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 454/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9159 — CVC/MUFG/Ngern Tid Lor)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 454/03)

On 10 December 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9159. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9159. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Fernando ROMERO-SALGADO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8237.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
SMITH BARNEY INCOME FUNDS
on behalf of the
Smith Barney Premium Total Return Fund

Supplement dated February 19, 1998 to
Statement of Additional Information dated November 28, 1997


	On February 6, 1998, shareholders of the Smith Barney 
Premium Total Return Fund (the "Fund") approved a modification of 
the Fund's fundamental policy with respect to diversification.  
The Fund's modified policy states that:

The Fund will not invest in a manner that would cause it to 
fail to be a "diversified company" under the Investment 
Company Act of 1940 and the rules, regulations and orders 
thereunder.

















FD 01410
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/21/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       89,485
COMMITMENTS
  22,856    5,679    2,013   58,571   79,231   83,440   86,923    6,045    2,562

CHANGES FROM 05/14/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,257)
    -564    1,669      276    2,154     -359    1,866    1,586      391      671

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    25.5      6.3      2.2     65.5     88.5     93.2     97.1      6.8      2.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       80)
      11        5        1       42       35       53       41
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/21/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      210,390
COMMITMENTS
  64,382   36,392    2,222  126,417  165,386  193,021  204,000   17,369    6,390

CHANGES FROM 05/14/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      9,515)
     806    1,693      993    6,990    6,126    8,789    8,812      726      703

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    30.6     17.3      1.1     60.1     78.6     91.7     97.0      8.3      3.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      148)
      38       15        9       72       51      116       69
```

----

Updated May 24, 2013
Independent Auditors' Consent



To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Greenwich Street California Municipal Fund Inc.:

We consent to the use of our report dated October 15, 1997, for the 
Greenwich Street California Municipal Fund Inc. incorporated herein by 
reference and to the references to our Firm under the headings 
"Financial Highlights" and "Experts" in the Prospectus.
 



	KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


New York, New York
December 18, 1997
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.3820 — Avnet/Memec)

(2005/C 131/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

----
Lena LASHER, Petitioner v. Naomi Reice BUCHWALD, Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

No. 18-9317

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
STAPLES, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. COMPTROLLER OF THE TREASURY OF MARYLAND.

No. 19-119

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Donald E. Fowler, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of SumTotal Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SumTotal Systems, Inc.



/s/ DONALD E. FOWLERDonald E. FowlerChief Executive Officer and DirectorDate: May 9, 2007


I, Neil J. Laird, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of SumTotal Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SumTotal Systems, Inc.



/s/ NEIL J. LAIRDNeil J. LairdChief Financial OfficerDate: May 9, 2007
Constance F. RUSSELL, Petitioner v. FIRST RESOLUTION INVESTMENT CORPORATION;

No. 18-9283

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
EXHIBIT
32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of Leader Hill Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
November 30, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), The undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to the best of my knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully
    complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                            
| | (2) | The information
    contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
    Company.



|Date:
    July 1, 2020 |        |                                              
|---------------------- | ------ | ---------------------------------------------
|                       | By:    | /s/
    Seah Chia Yee                        
|                       | Title: | President, Secretary,
    Treasurer, Director



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.