alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONS



I, Richard B. Vincent, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this
amended quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A, for the quarter ended June 30, 2004,
of STAT Software, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a) 
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) 
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) 
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) 
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) 
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date:  May 2, 2005



/s/ Richard B. Vincent

Treasurer
4

FA-BETH LANG- IER 

TICE 

Order issued November , 2012 

In The 

Truth of Apptatz 

ITi1tI listrirt ni txtus at Dallas 

No. 05-12-00944-CV 

IN THE INTEREST OF P.E., C.E., C.E., AND S.E., CHILDREN 

ORDER 

The Court DENIES court reporter Kim Allen's sanctions motion which was included in her 

November 1, 2012 response to Father' s motion to review the trial court' s order sustaining the contest 

to the affidavit of indigence
Daniel H. KILGORE, Petitioner, v. Ronda J. PASH, Warden, et al.

No. 18-9462

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 07, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Wadith Stockinger NADER, et ux., Petitioners, v. CITY OF PAPILLION, NEBRASKA, et al.

No. 19-88

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Travis Wade MATTHEWS, Petitioner v. PENNSYLVANIA

No. 19-5802

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 21, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Harrisburg Office denied.
Neil FEINBERG, et al., Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

No. 19-129

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1)   | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                August 14, 2008 | By:    | /s/                Cary                J. Claiborne         |
|--------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |   | Cary                J. Claiborne                            |
|                                 |   | Chief                Financial Officer                      |
|                                 |   | (Principal                Financial and Accounting Officer) |

----
# Official Journal C 186/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 186 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 635 June 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 186

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 635 June 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2020/C 186/01 | Council conclusions on risk management in the area of cultural heritage | 1 |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 186/02 | Euro exchange rates — 4 June 2020 | 7 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2020/C 186/01

Council conclusions on risk management in the area of cultural heritage

1

European Commission

2020/C 186/02

Euro exchange rates — 4 June 2020

7

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 186/03 | Publication of an application for approval of an amendment, which is not minor, to a product specification pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 8 |
| 2020/C 186/04 | Publication of the amended single document following the approval of a minor amendment pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 | 19 |
| 2020/C 186/05 | Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to the product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 | 23 |
| 2020/C 186/06 | Publication of the amended single document following the approval of a minor amendment pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 | 38 |

V   Announcements

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2020/C 186/03

Publication of an application for approval of an amendment, which is not minor, to a product specification pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

8

2020/C 186/04

Publication of the amended single document following the approval of a minor amendment pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012

19

2020/C 186/05

Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to the product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33

23

2020/C 186/06

Publication of the amended single document following the approval of a minor amendment pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012

38

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.10


                                December 9, 2003

Mr. Jeffrey C. Lapin
1000 Park Ave, Apt 4C
New York, NY 10028


        Re.:  Employment Agreement dated November 18, 2002 (the "Agreement")

Dear Mr. Lapin:

        This will confirm our agreement to amend the Agreement as follows:

        1. The second sentence of Section 1 of the Agreement is hereby deleted
        in its entirety.

        2. Section 2(d) is hereby amended to reflect that Employee is a director
        of Employer.

        3. Section 6(g) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety, and
        a new Section 6(g) is substituted in lieu thereof, to read as follows:
        "In the event Employee terminates the Agreement for any reason at any
        time after March 30, 2004, Employee shall be entitled to receive Salary
        and cash bonus (which bonus shall be not be less than $400,000 per
        annum) and health benefits for a period of eighteen (18) months from the
        date of termination by Employee, and Employee shall have the duties and
        obligations set forth in Section 7 of the Agreement. In the event
        Employee terminates the Agreement prior to March 30, 2004, Employee
        shall be entitled to payment of Salary and benefits through the date of
        termination by Employee, and Employee shall have the duties and
        obligations set forth in Section 7 of the Agreement. In the event the
        Agreement is terminated for any reason, Employee agrees to resign as a
        director of Employer effective as of the date of such termination."

    All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain unchanged and are in
full force and effect.

                                      Very truly yours,


                                      Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.

                                      By: /s/ Ryan A. Brant
                                          -----------------------------
                                              Ryan A. Brant, Chairman


Agreed:

/s/ Jeffrey C. Lapin
-----------------------------
    Jeffrey C. Lapin
Saad BAHODA, Petitioner, v. Sherman CAMPBELL, Warden.

No. 19-6534

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
**BERNARD FINANCIAL SERVICING GROUP**

20700 Civic Center Drive

Suite 240

Southfield, Michigan 48076

 

Tel: (248) 799-9200

Fax: (248) 799-9208

 

 

MANAGEMENT'S ASSERTATION ON COMPLIANCE

WITH REGULATION AB CRITERIA

 

 

Bernard Financial Corporation(the "Asserting Party") is responsible for assessing compliance as ofDecember 31, 2021, and the year ended with the following servicing criteria setforth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's RegulationAB: 1122 (d) (1) (i), 1122 (d) (1) (ii), 1122 (d) (1) (iv), 1122 (d) (1) (v),1122 (d) (2) (i), 1122 (d) (2) (ii), 1122 (d) (2) (iii), 1122 (d) (2) (iv), 1122(d) (2) (v), 1122 (d) (2) (vi), 1122 (d) (2) (vii), 1122 (d) (4) (i), 1122 (d) (4)(ii), 1122 (d) (4) (iii), 1122 (d) (4) (iv), 1122 (d) (4) (v), 1122 (d) (4) (vi),1122 (d) (4) (viii), 1122 (d) (4) (ix), 1122 (d) (4) (x), 1122 (d) (4) (xi), 1122(d) (4) (xii), 1122 (d) (4) (xiii) and 1122 (d) (4) (xiv). These servicing criteriaapply to public asset­ backed issuances commencing after December 31, 2005.

 

The Assorting Party hasassessed its compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the reportingperiod and has not identified any instances of material noncompliance. The AssertingParty has concluded that they have complied, in all material respects, with theapplicable servicing criteria as outlined above for those asset-backedsecuritization transactions serviced by the Asserting Party.

 

Tramer, Shore & Zwick,CPA's, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued anattestation report on the assessment of compliance with the applicableservicing criteria for the reporting period set forth in this assertion.

 

 

/s/ Dennis S. Bernard

Dennis S. Bernard 

President

Bernard Financial Corporation

 

 

February 4, 2022

 

 

**Real Estate Finance andInvestment Brokers**

 

(logo) MBA MEMBER

** **
# Official Journal L 24/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2014.024.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 24 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5728 January 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2014.024.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 24

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5728 January 2014

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 of 20 January 2014 fixing for 2014 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, to Union vessels, in certain non-Union waters | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 of 20 January 2014 fixing for 2014 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, to Union vessels, in certain non-Union waters

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1976

CALISTER SIMANGWI, Petitioner,

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: April 22, 2009 Decided: May 20, 2009

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Theodore Nkwenti, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Michael F. Hertz, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Michelle G. Latour, Assistant Director, Nairi M. Simonian, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Calister Simangwi, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing her appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of her requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. Before this court, Simangwi challenges the determination that she failed to establish her eligibility for asylum. To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence [s]he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” INS v.

Elias-Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Simangwi fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Accordingly, we cannot grant the relief that she seeks. Additionally, we uphold the denial of Simangwi’s request for withholding of removal. “Because the burden of proof for withholding of removal is higher than for asylum--even though the facts that must be proved are the same--an applicant who is ineligible for asylum is necessarily ineligible for withholding of removal under [8 U.S.C.] § 1231(b)(3).”

Camara v. Ashcroft , 378 F.3d 361, 367 (4th Cir. 2004). Because

23 Simangwi failed to show that she is eligible for asylum, she cannot meet the higher standard for withholding of removal.

We also find that substantial evidence supports the finding that Simangwi failed to meet the standard for relief under the Convention Against Torture. To obtain such relief, an applicant must establish that “it is more likely than not that he or she would be tortured if removed to the proposed country

of removal.” 8 C.F.R. § 1208 .16(c)(2) (2008). We find that Simangwi failed to make the requisite showing before the immigration court. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Kelvin TOWNSEND, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6135

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 12, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I,
Dennis L. Randolph, Jr., certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TNS, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15f and 15d-15f) for the
registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



DATE:
November 9, 2007

|/s/DENNIS L. RANDOLPH, JR.Dennis L. Randolph, Jr.
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6817

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MARIKA LODY RUNNELLS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-88-53-N, CA-97-461-N) Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: August 28, 1998 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marika Lody Runnells, Appellant Pro Se. James Ashford Metcalfe, Assistant United States Attorney, Karen L. Gore, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. As a result of the statute of limitations embodied in the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat 1214, Appellant was required to file her § 2255 motion on or before April 23, 1997. See Brown v. Angelone , ___ F.3d ___, 1998 WL 389030 (4th Cir. July 14, 1998) (Nos. 96-7173, 96-7208). Appellant submitted her motion to prison officials for filing on April 24, 1997. See Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266, 270 (1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Wingrove ROBINSON, Petitioner v. RAINTREE TOWER APARTMENTS, et al.

No. 19-5726

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Anthony Darnell STOKES, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6424

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00356

- CV

K ENYSA G OFF

, Appellant

V

.

M ORGAN R OGERS AND S TACY L YNN

P EARL , Appellees §

§

§

§ O n Appeal from the 17th District Cou rt

of Tarrant County ( 017

- 327787

- 21 )

March 28, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the jud gm ent of the trial

court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that appellant Kenysa Goff shall bear the costs of this

appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Brian Walker

Justice Brian Walker
IN RE Nathan Wayne SMITH, Petitioner.

No. 19-5943

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1113 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1113

 To make the antitrust laws applicable to a political committee under 
  the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 which is established and 
administered by a separate segregated fund of a corporation pursuant to 
                   section 316(b)(2)(C) of such Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 13, 2013

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To make the antitrust laws applicable to a political committee under 
  the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 which is established and 
administered by a separate segregated fund of a corporation pursuant to 
                   section 316(b)(2)(C) of such Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPLICATION OF ANTITRUST LAWS TO CORPORATE PACS.

    The antitrust laws shall apply to a political committee under the 
Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 which is established and 
administered by a separate segregated fund of a corporation pursuant to 
section 316(b)(2)(C) of such Act, and in accordance with such laws, a 
political committee for multiple legal entities in the same business 
shall be prohibited.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION.

    For purposes of this Act, the term ``antitrust laws'' has the 
meaning given such term in the first section of the Clayton Act, except 
that such term includes section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act 
to the extent that such section 5 applies to unfair methods of 
competition.
                                 <all>
```