alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 233/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 233 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6118 September 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 233

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6118 September 2018

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1244 of 4 September 2018 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Bleu des Causses’ (PDO)) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1244 of 4 September 2018 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Bleu des Causses’ (PDO))

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
STATE OF LOUISIANA

STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

BRUCE CONLEY

NO. 2023 KW 0618

SEPTEMBER 25, 2023

In Re: Bruce Conley, applying for supervisory writs, 16th

Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Mary, No. 2017- 

199615. 

BEFORE: GUIDRY, C. J., CHUTZ AND LANIER, JJ. 

WRIT GRANTED. The district court is ORDERED to direct the

court reporter for Division D to ascertain whether the

recordings for the proceedings that took place on March 18, 

2019, April 22, 2019, and June 18, 2019 in case number 17- 199615

exist and if so, direct the court reporter to prepare and file

the transcripts of those proceedings with the Clerk of Court for

the 16th Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Mary, on or

before November 22, 2023. The Clerk of Court is then ORDERED to

forward said transcripts to relator on or before November 29, 

2023, if it has not already done so. 

However, if it is determined that the recordings for the

above referenced proceedings do not exist, the district court is

directed to cause the record to be supplemented with a

certificate that the transcripts cannot be prepared, on or

before October 25, 2023. The Clerk of Court is then ORDERED to

forward said certificate to relator, on or before November 1, 

2023. 

JMG

WRC

WIL

OURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

Y CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
Javier LEON, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6581

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 16, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Fidel RIOS, Jr., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6650

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Scott ROTHSTEIN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-1072.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 6, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 117 (Friday, June 17, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 36520]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13136]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Board of Scientific 
Counselors, NIAAA.
    The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of 
individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the National 
Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, including consideration of 
personnel qualifications and performance, and the competence of 
individual investigators, the disclosure of which would constitute a 
clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, NIAAA.
    Date: September 14-15, 2022.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personnel qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, National Institute on 
Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 5625 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20852 
(Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: David Goldman, M.D., Clinical Director, Office 
of the Clinical Director, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, 5625 Fishers Lane, Suite 
3S32, MSC 9412, Rockville, MD 20852, (301) 443-0059, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#afcbced9c6cbc8c0c3cbc2cec1efc2cec6c381c1c6c781c8c0d9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b5d1d4c3dcd1d2dad9d1d8d4dbf5d8d4dcd99bdbdcdd9bd2dac3">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical 
Research and Research Support Awards, National Institutes of Health, 
HHS)

    Dated: June 14, 2022.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-13136 Filed 6-16-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
20 F.R.D. 169

#### The UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Nelson MADDUX, Defendant.

Cr. No. 2682.

District Court, Alaska. Third Division, Anchorage.

Dec. 28, 1956.

*578Lloyd L. Dugger, Asst. U. S. Atty., Anchorage, Alaska, for plaintiff.

Paul F. Robison, Anchorage, Alaska, for defendant.

McCARREY, District Judge.

This master comes before the court upon a motion, to modify the sentence by suspending it in part and placing the defendant on'probation.

The defendant was found guilty, by a jury, for the crime of assault with intent to kill, '65-4 — 16, A.C.L.A. 1949, and was sentenced to’ serve five years on the 15th day of Sep-tember, 1954. He is presently in the custody of the Attorney General of the United States of America serving time • under this sentence.

Defendant’s motion is predicated upon Sess.Laws Alaska 1955, c. 195, which purports to give the District Courts of the Territory' of Alaska the power to suspend and modify sentences imposed by these courts at any time within five yéars from the dáte of imposition of sentence.

The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, by Congressional action, have been extended to the District Courts of Alaska.

Rule 54, of Fed.R.Crim.P., 18 U.S.C.A. provides as-folio,ws.

> “These rules apply to *all criminal proceedings*in the United States district courts which include the District Court for the Territory of Alaska * * - (Emphasis supplied.)

*579Rule 35 of the Fed.R.Crim.P. provides as follows:

> “The court may correct an illegal sentence at any time. The court may reduce a sentence within 60 days after the sentence is imposed, or within 60 days after receipt by the court of a mandate issued upon affirmance of the judgment or dismissal of the appeal, or within 60 days after receipt of an order of the Supreme Court denying an application for a writ of certiorari.”

This limitation is jurisdictional, and after the expiration of the time, prescribed, the court is without power to modify the sentence for reasons other than illegality. United States ex rel. Quinn v. Hunter, 7 Cir., 1947, 162 F.2d 644; United States v. Martin, D.C.W.D.S.C.1948, 8 F.R.D. 89, affirmed 4 Cir., 168 F.2d 1003, certiorari denied 335 U.S. 872, 69 S.Ct. 161, 93 L.Ed. 416. Defendant’s motion certainly does not come within the limits established by Rule 35. The only remaining issue is whether the Territorial Legislature.had the power to enlarge the time within which the modification could be made for Territorial offenses.

Section 9 of the Alaska Organic Act, 48 U.S.C.A. 77, provides that the legislative power of the Territorial Legislature extends to all rightful subjects of legislation,

> “ * * * not inconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States * *

Rule 54 applies the rules to all criminal proceedings without differentiation between territorial and federal violations.

 I am of the opinion that the 1955 act, supra, is clearly inconsistent with the procedural laws established through the power of Congress. Accordingly, I find that this court is without power to modify the sentence imposed upon the defendant and the motion is hereby denied.
Angel RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner v. Laura HEIT, et al.

No. 19-6022

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
# C_2018119EN.01000502.xml

| 5.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 119/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 119/5

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2018/C 119/07)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 1.1.2018 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 1.1.2018-31.12.2018 |
| Member State | Belgium |
| Stock or Group of stocks | RJU/07D. |
| Species | Undulate ray (Raja undulata) |
| Zone | Union waters of 7d |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 04/TQ120 |

Date and time of closure

1.1.2018

Duration

1.1.2018-31.12.2018

Member State

Belgium

Stock or Group of stocks

RJU/07D.

Species

Undulate ray (Raja undulata)

Raja undulata

Zone

Union waters of 7d

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

04/TQ120

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
Independent Auditors' Report


To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Smith Barney Aggressive Growth Fund Inc.:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements
of the Smith Barney Aggressive Growth Fund Inc. (the Fund) for
the year ended August 31, 2002, we considered its internal
control, including control activities for safeguarding
securities, in order to determine our auditing procedures for the
purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and
to comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide
assurance on internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Those controls include the safeguarding of assets against
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, error or
fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any
evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to
the risk that it may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in internal control that might be material
weaknesses under standards established by the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness is a
condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the
internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low
level the risk that errors or fraud in amounts that would be
material in relation to the financial statements being audited
may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees
in the normal course of performing their assigned functions.
However, we noted no matters involving internal control and its
operation, including controls for safeguarding securities that we
consider to be material weaknesses as defined above as of August
31, 2002.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management and the Board of Directors of the Fund and the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not intended to be and
should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.


                                                       KPMG LLP

New York, New York
October 11, 2002
Marshall SPIEGEL, Petitioner, v. Corrine MCCLINTIC, et al.

No. 18-1558

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
##### 



Exhibit 10.1
 DIRECT METHANOL FUEL CELL CORPORATION  2002 STOCK OPTION/STOCK ISSUANCE PLAN
 ARTICLE ONE
 GENERAL PROVISIONS
 I. PURPOSE OF THE PLAN
   II. STRUCTURE OF THE PLAN
     III. ADMINISTRATION OF THE PLAN




---



##### 



IV. ELIGIBILITY
       V. STOCK SUBJECT TO THE PLAN
   2.




---



##### 



3.




---



##### 



ARTICLE TWO
 OPTION GRANT PROGRAM
 I. OPTION TERMS
 provided however
 Exercise Price
       4.




---



##### 



Exercise and Term of Options
 Effect of Termination of Service
        5.




---



##### 



Stockholder Rights
 Unvested Shares
 First Refusal Rights
 Limited Transferability of Options
 6.




---



##### 



Withholding
 II. INCENTIVE OPTIONS
  Eligibility
 Exercise Price
 Dollar Limitation
 10% Stockholder
 III. CORPORATE TRANSACTION
  7.




---



##### 



provided
   8.




---



##### 



IV. CANCELLATION AND REGRANT OF OPTIONS
  9.




---



##### 



ARTICLE THREE
 STOCK ISSUANCE PROGRAM
 I. STOCK ISSUANCE TERMS
  Purchase Price
     Vesting Provisions
   10.




---



##### 



First Refusal Rights
 II. CORPORATE TRANSACTION
  11.




---



##### 



III. SHARE ESCROW/LEGENDS
  12.




---



##### 



ARTICLE FOUR
 MISCELLANEOUS
 I. FINANCING
  II. EFFECTIVE DATE AND TERM OF PLAN
  earliest
 III. AMENDMENT OF THE PLAN
  13.




---



##### 



IV. USE OF PROCEEDS
  V. WITHHOLDING
  VI. REGULATORY APPROVALS
  VII. NO EMPLOYMENT OR SERVICE RIGHTS
  14.




---



##### 



VIII. FINANCIAL REPORTS
  15.




---



##### 



APPENDIX
  Board
 Code
 Committee
 Common Stock
 Corporate Transaction
   Corporation
 Disability
 Employee
 Exercise Date
 A-1.




---



##### 



Fair Market Value
    Incentive Option
 Involuntary Termination
   A-2.




---



##### 



Misconduct
 1934 Act
 Non-Statutory Option
 Option Grant Program
 Optionee
 Parent
 Participant
 Plan
 Plan Administrator
 Service
 Stock Exchange
 Stock Issuance Agreement
 A-3.




---



##### 



Stock Issuance Program
 Subsidiary
 10% Stockholder
 A-4.
# C_2018248EN.01000101.xml

| 16.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 248/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 248/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8850 — Kaiser+Kraft/Hoffmann/Simple System)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 248/01)

On 3 July 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8850. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8850. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2018267EN.01000101.xml

| 30.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/1

---

Withdrawal of notification of a concentration

(Case M.8832 — Knauf/Armstrong)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 267/01)

(Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004)

On 20 June 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration between Knauf and Armstrong. On 24 July 2018, the notifying party informed the Commission that it withdrew its notification.

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY
RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 CERTIFICATIONS I, W. Anderson Geater, Jr., certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Origen Financial,
Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):




---



##### 



Page 2  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting. Dated: November 12, 2004
    
    /s/ W. Anderson Geater, Jr.W. Anderson Geater, Jr.,Chief Financial Officer of OrigenFinancial, Inc.
David Earl ISON, Petitioner v. Richard BROWN, Superintendent, Wabash Valley Correctional Facility.

No. 19-5900

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
10f-3 REPORT

                        TRAVELERS SEREIS TRUST
                    MFS EMERGING GROWTH PORTFOLIO

                 March 1, 2001 through June 30, 2001

                     Trade                                    % of
Issuer               Date    Selling Dealer    Amount   Price Issue(1)

AFC Enterprises      3/2/01  Goldman Sachs    $ 27,200	 17.00  2.60A
XM Satellite Radio   3/1/01  Bear Stearns      101,875   10.19  2.67B


(1) Represents purchases by all affiliated funds; may not exceed
    25% of the offering.

A - Includes purchases of $216,500 by other affiliated mutual funds.
B - Includes purchases of $98,125 by other affiliated mutual funds.







                             10f-3 REPORT

                        TRAVELERS SERIES TRUST
                        QUALITY BOND PORTFOLIO

                 January 1, 2001 through June 30, 2001

                   Trade                                        % of
Issuer             Date    Selling Dealer    Amount     Price   Issue(1)

GMAC               1/4/01 Morgan Stanley DW $1,500,000 $99.576   0.04%
 6.75% due 1/15/06

Gulf Canada        1/5/01  Goldman Sachs     2,000,000  99.650   0.67
 Resources
 7.125% due 1/15/11

Enterprise Rent    1/9/01  Goldman Sachs     1,500,000  99.880   0.15
 A Car
 6.75% due 1/15/06

Bank of America    1/17/01 Bank of America   3,500,000  99.496   0.12
 7.40% due 1/15/11

Ford Motor Credit  1/25/01 Morgan Stanley DW  3,500,000 99.825   0.09
 6.875% due 2/1/06

CIT Group          1/31/01 Bank of America    2,700,000  99.820   0.27
 6.50% due 2/7/06

Worldcom Inc       5/9/01 JP Morgan Chase     3,000,000  98.900   0.13A
 7.500% due 5/15/11

Worldcom Inc       5/15/01 JP Morgan Chase    3,000,000  99.820   0.33B
 6.500% due 5/15/04



(1) Represents purchases by all affiliated funds; may not exceed
    25% of the offering.

A - Includes purchases of $2,000,000 by other affiliated mutual funds.
B - Includes purchases of $2,000,000 by other affiliated mutual funds.