alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  each of the  undersigned  officers  of  GreenShift
Corporation (the "Company"), certifies that:

     1.   The Quarterly  Report on Form 10Q/A  (Amendment  No. 1) of the Company
          for the period ended June 30, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with
          the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange
          Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




                                /S/      KEVIN KREISLER
                                --------------------------------------
Dated :  October 16, 2009                KEVIN KREISLER
                                         Chief Executive Officer

                                /S/      EDWARD R. CARROLL
                                --------------------------------------
                                         EDWARD R. CARROLL
                                         Chief Financial Officer


This  certification  is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,
subject  to the  knowledge  standard  contained  therein,  and not for any other
purpose.
Isaac THOMAS, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5025

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of *Rehaif* v. *United States* , 588 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 2191, 204 L.Ed.2d 594 (2019).
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018402EN.01000801.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 8.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/8 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9151 — IFM/Trafigura/Simba Holdings)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 402/08)

1.

On 31 October 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018402EN.01000801-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | IFM Investors Pty Ltd (‘IFM’, Australia), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Trafigura Group Pte Ltd (‘Trafigura’, Singapore). |

IFM and Trafigura acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Simba Holding S.à r.l (‘Simba Holdings’, Luxembourg), Trafigura’s subsidiary owning and operating marine terminal facilities for dry bulk cargo, and providing transport services for liquid bulk cargo, as well as global freight forwarding and logistics services.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for IFM: global provider of investment services across infrastructure, debt investments, listed equities and private equity,

—   for Trafigura: independent commodity trading and logistics group.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018402EN.01000801-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9151 — IFM/Trafigura/Simba Holdings

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018402EN.01000801-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018402EN.01000801-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
# C_2018407EN.01000101.xml

| 12.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 407/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 407/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8829 — Total Produce/Dole Food Company)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 407/01)

On 30 July 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8829. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8829. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Independent Auditors' Report


The Board of Directors of the
Smith Barney Investment Funds, Inc.:

In planning and performing our audits of the financial statements of the Smith
Barney Investment Grade Bond Fund, Smith Barney Peach Tree Growth Fund, and
Smith Barney Government Securities Fund of Smith Barney Investment Funds, Inc.
(the "Funds") for the year ended December 31, 2000, we considered its internal
control, including control activities for safeguarding securities, in order to
determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on
the financial statements and to comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR,
not to provide assurance on internal control.

The management of the Funds is responsible for establishing and maintaining
internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments
by management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs
of controls.  Generally, controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the
entity's objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. Those controls include the
safeguarding of assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, error or fraud may occur
and not be detected.  Also, projection of any evaluation of internal control
to future periods is subject to the risk that it may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily disclose all
matters in internal control that might be material weaknesses under standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A
material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of one or
more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low
level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in amounts that
would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited may
occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal
course of performing their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters
involving internal control and its operation, including controls for
safeguarding securities, that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined
above as of December 31, 2000.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of management, the
Board of Directors of the Funds, and the Securities and Exchange Commission
and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these
specified parties.


February 9, 2001
| 1. | Such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,      2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for      the period ending June 30, 2008, fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations      of BTX Holdings, Inc. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      August 14, 2008                                                                        |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                              |
| /s/ Scott      J. Silverman                                                                       |
| Scott      J. SilvermanPresident,      Chief      Executive Officer, Chief      Financial Officer |
James D. THOMAS, Jr., aka Wayne Thomas, Petitioner v. NEW YORK

No. 19-5231

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Judicial Department denied.
requesting extension:

Case 5:23-cv-00134-RWS-JBB Document 12 Filed 12/07/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 187
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before

publication in the New York Reports.

----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 101 SSM 2 The People &c., Respondent, v. Anthony C., Appellant.

David J. Klem, for appellant. Susan Gliner, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The Appellate Division opinion does not suggest a misapprehension - 1 -- 2 - SSM 2

or misapplication of its authority to review Youthful Offender adjudications for abuse of discretion (CPL 720.20 [1] [a]), or under its broad interest-of-justice jurisdiction (see CPL 470.15 [6] [b]; People v Dawn Maria C., 67 NY2d 625, 627 [1986]). * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein and Fahey concur. Decided March 31, 2015

- 2 -
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 115 (Wednesday, June 15, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 36153]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12851]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


National Artificial Intelligence Research Resource Task Force; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the 
following meeting:
    Name and Committee Code: National Artificial Intelligence Research 
Resource Task Force (84629).
    Date and Time: July 25, 2022, 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. EDT.
    Place: NSF, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314/Virtual.
    Virtual meeting attendance only; to attend the virtual meeting, 
please send your request for the virtual meeting link to the following 
email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2e4d434b5d5d4f436e405d4800494158"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="17747a726464767a5779647139707861">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Brenda Williams, National Science Foundation, 2415 
Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; Telephone: 703-292-8900; 
email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#600217090c0c09010d200e13064e070f16"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="284a5f41444441494568465b4e064f475e">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Purpose of Meeting: The Task Force shall investigate the 
feasibility and advisability of establishing and sustaining a National 
Artificial Intelligence Research Resource; and propose a roadmap 
detailing how such resource should be established and sustained.
    Agenda: In this meeting, the Task Force will receive readouts from 
working-group discussions held on the topics of developing a startup, 
funding, and sustainment roadmap; defining specific structures and 
processes around the ownership and administration of the NAIRR; 
implementing ethical/responsible research controls; and integrating 
computational, data, and testbed resources into a federated 
cyberinfrastructure. The Task Force will also discuss international 
perspectives on the NAIRR and statutory authorities related to 
establishing the NAIRR, and deliberate on an outline of the final 
implementation plan.

    Dated: June 9, 2022.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2022-12851 Filed 6-14-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 303 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as Amended, on Insulation

# Memorandum for the Secretary of Energy

Ensuring a robust, resilient, and sustainable domestic industrial base to meet the requirements of the clean energy economy is essential to our national security, a resilient energy sector, and the preservation of domestic critical infrastructure.  Therefore, by the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 303 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (the ``Act'') (50 U.S.C. 4533), I hereby determine, pursuant to section 303(a)(5) of the Act, that:

(1) insulation is an industrial resource, material, or critical technology item essential to the national defense;

(2) without Presidential action under section 303 of the Act, United States industry cannot reasonably be expected to provide the capability for the needed industrial resource, material, or critical technology item in a timely manner; and

(3) purchases, purchase commitments, or other action pursuant to section 303 of the Act are the most cost effective, expedient, and practical alternative method for meeting the need. 

Pursuant to section 303(a)(7)(B) of the Act, I find that action to expand the domestic production capability for insulation is necessary to avert an industrial resource or critical technology item shortfall that would severely impair national defense capability. Therefore, I waive the requirements of section 303(a)(1)-(a)(6) of the Act for the purpose of expanding the domestic production capability for insulation.

                    You are authorized and directed to publish this determination in the                     *Federal Register*.                

[FR Doc. 2022-12584

Billing code 6450-01-P
WITHDRAWN 4-10-2019

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-19-00040-CV

MATTHEW MARK HESLEP,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 19th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2008-1531-C1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Matthew Mark Heslep, appeals from an “Order to Withdraw Funds” 

signed by the trial court on August 24, 2018. By letter dated February 22, 2019, the Clerk 

of this Court notified appellant that the appeal is subject to dismissal because the original 

filing fee had not been paid and warned appellant that the Court would dismiss the 

appeal unless, within ten days from the date of the letter, appellant paid the filing fee or 

obtained indigent status for the purpose of appeal. Ten days have passed, and appellant 
Heslep v. State Page 2

has not paid the filing fee for this appeal or obtained indigent status. Accordingly, we 

hereby dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

JOHN E. NEILL

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Neill

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed March 13, 2019

[CV06]
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Project No. 5261-023]
 On August 27, 2021, Green Mountain Power Corporation filed an application for a subsequent minor license for the 365-kilowatt Newbury Hydroelectric Project (Newbury Project; FERC No. 5261). The Newbury Project is located on the Wells River in the Town of Newbury in Orange County, Vermont. The project does not occupy federal lands. In accordance with the Commission's regulations, on April 6, 2022, Commission staff issued a notice that the project was ready for environmental analysis (REA Notice). Based on the information in the record, including comments filed on the REA Notice, staff does not anticipate that licensing the project would constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. Therefore, staff intends to prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA) on the application to relicense the Newbury Project. The EA will be issued and circulated for review by all interested parties. All comments filed on the EA will be analyzed by staff and considered in the Commission's final licensing decision. The application will be processed according to the following schedule. Revisions to the schedule may be made as appropriate. Milestone
Target dateCommission issues EA
January 2023.1Comments on EA
February 2023.1
                         The Council on Environmental Quality's (CEQ) regulations under 40 CFR 1501.10(b)(1) require that EAs be completed within 1 year of the federal action agency's decision to prepare an EA. This notice establishes the Commission's intent to prepare an EA for the Newbury Project. Therefore, in accordance with CEQ's regulations, the EA must be issued within 1 year of the issuance date of this notice.
 Any questions regarding this notice may be directed to Adam Peer at (202) 502-8449 or 
                    *adam.peer@ferc.gov.* Dated: June 10, 2022. Debbie-Anne A. Reese, Deputy Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2022-13002 Filed 6-15-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Huntsman LLC (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter R. Huntsman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| |  | /s/ Peter R. HuntsmanPeter R. Huntsman Chief Executive OfficerNovember 19, 2004
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

---



QuickLinks
Barbara E. BROWN, Petitioner, v. SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, et al.

No. 19-7471.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 26, 2020

Petition for rehearing denied.
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION, et al., Petitioners, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; and

Valero Energy Corporation, et al., Petitioners, v. Environmental Protection Agency.

No. 19-835.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Motion of National Association of Home Builders of the United States for leave to *2793file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
IN RE Mary CAPRI, Petitioner

No. 19-5371

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Keith Edward WALKER, Petitioner, v. Ronda PASH, Warden.

No. 19-7192.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 02/04/14          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      384,117
COMMITMENTS
 101,502  152,732   84,309  173,111  120,887  358,922  357,928   25,195   26,189

CHANGES FROM 01/28/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      8,074)
  -6,653  -20,927    1,764    9,993   24,841    5,104    5,678    2,970    2,396

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    26.4     39.8     21.9     45.1     31.5     93.4     93.2      6.6      6.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      168)
      59       57       74       39       38      142      134
```

----

Updated February 7, 2014
Julisa TOLENTINO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5082

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Glen PLOURDE, Petitioner v. Jane DOE

No. 19-448

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Judicial Court of Maine denied.
Monue Forkpayea GEIMAH, Applicant v. William P. BARR, Attorney General

No. 19A21

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Application for stay addressed to Justice Ginsburg and referred to the Court denied.