alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018007EN.01001002.xml

| 10.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/10

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2018/C 7/07)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 9.12.2017 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 9.12.2017 – 31.12.2017 |
| Member State | Germany |
| Stock or Group of stocks | MAC/8C3411 and related special condition MAC/*08B. |
| Species | Mackerel (Scomber scombrus) |
| Zone | VIIIc, IX and X; Union waters of CECAF 34.1.1 |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 50/TQ127 |

Date and time of closure

9.12.2017

Duration

9.12.2017 – 31.12.2017

Member State

Germany

Stock or Group of stocks

MAC/8C3411 and related special condition MAC/*08B.

Species

Mackerel (Scomber scombrus)

Scomber scombrus

Zone

VIIIc, IX and X; Union waters of CECAF 34.1.1

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

50/TQ127

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

BOBBY WAYNE LAND (1) 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NUMBER 6:23-CR-00113-JDK 

ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S 

REPORT AND FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY 

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable John D. Love, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed 

by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate 

Judge recommended that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant 

guilty on Count Three of the Indictment. 

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings. 

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea 

of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers 

acceptance of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Bobby Wayne 

Land (1) GUILTY of Count Three of the Indictment, charging a violation of Title 21 U.S.C. 

§ 841(a)(1) - Possession with the Intent to Distribute and Distribution of Methamphetamine.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this day of

___________________________________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 25th March, 2024.

Case 6:23-cr-00113-JDK-JDL Document 66 Filed 03/25/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 174
# C_2018195EN.01000601.xml

| 7.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8887 — Platinum Equity/LifeScan)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 195/02)

On 4 June 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8887. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8887. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# Official Journal L 177/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 177 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 591 July 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 177

English edition

Legislation

Volume 591 July 2016

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2016/1062 of 24 May 2016 on the conclusion on behalf of the European Union of the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Liberia and the Implementation Protocol thereto | 1 |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1063 of 30 June 2016 amending for the 247th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations | 4 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1064 of 30 June 2016 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 7 |
| | | DIRECTIVES |
| | * | Council Directive (EU) 2016/1065 of 27 June 2016 amending Directive 2006/112/EC as regards the treatment of vouchers | 9 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Council Decision (EU) 2016/1062 of 24 May 2016 on the conclusion on behalf of the European Union of the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Liberia and the Implementation Protocol thereto

1

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1063 of 30 June 2016 amending for the 247th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations

4

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1064 of 30 June 2016 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

7

DIRECTIVES

*

Council Directive (EU) 2016/1065 of 27 June 2016 amending Directive 2006/112/EC as regards the treatment of vouchers

9

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Order issued October 29, 2013 Withdrawn; Order filed November 2 6 , 2013.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00568

- CV

____________ LIZZIE J. LOVALL, IN DIVIDUALLY; KEITH L. SHAW; INDIVIDUALLY: KENNET H L. YOUNG; INDIVID UALLY; KIM L.

SHAW, INDIVIDUALLY , Appellant s

V.
HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS , INDIVIDUALLY, OFF ICIALLY AND VICARIOUSLY; MAY WAL KER, CONSTABLE, PREC INCT 7, INDIVIDUALLY; RUTH M CDUGLE, INDIVIDUALLY ; DARLA TURNER, INDIVIDUALLY ; JOHN K. GEORGE, OF FICIALLY, INDIVIDUALLY; GOW

- MING CHAO, INDIVIDUA LLY; ET AL , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 190th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011

- 23410



### ORDER
On November 13, 2013, appellees filed a motion to reconsider the court’s order finding appellants indigent. Appellees motion is granted. This court’s orderof October 29, 2013 is withdrawn. Appellants filed a document on October 7,

2013 that this court is liberally construing as an affidavit of indigence filed in this

court. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(d)(2). P ursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(d)(2), a copy of the document is attached to this order and is sent to the court reporter for the 190th District Court and the Harris County District Clerk. A contest to appellants’ affidavit of indigence is due in this cou rt on or before December 6 , 2013.

PER CURIAM
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

VICTOR MORALES, *

* No. 17

- 694V

Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran

*

v. *

* Filed: December 21 , 2018

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Stipulation; flu vaccine; transverse

* myelitis.

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Diana L. Stadelnikas

, Maglio, Christopher & Toale, Sarasota, FL , for Pet itioner;

Glenn A. MacL eod

, United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for

Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION 1

On December 18

, 2018 , the parties filed a joint stipulation concerning the

petition for compensation filed by Victor Morales on May 25, 2017

. Petitioner

alleged that the flu vaccine he received on or about September 3 , 2015, which is

contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. §100.3(a), caused

him to suffer transverse myelitis

. Petitioner further alleges that he suffe red the

residual effects of this injury for more than six months. Petitioner represents that

there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on his

behalf as a result of his condition.

Respondent denies that the vaccines either caused or significantly

aggravated petitioner’s alleged injury or any other injury, and denies that

petitioner's current disabilities are the result of a vaccine

- related injury

.

1 T he E

- Government Act

, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and

Promotion of Electronic Government Services) , requires that the Court post this decision on its

website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing

redaction of medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 12(d)(4).

Any redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website.2

Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto. The

undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the

Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Damages awarded in that stipulation include:

A lump sum payment of $100 ,000.00 in the form of a check payable to

petitioner.

T his amount represents compensation for all damages that would be

available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 15(a).

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B,

the clerk is directed to enter judgment in case 1 7

- 694 V according to this decision

and the attached stipulation. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED

.

s /Christian J. Moran

Christian J. Moran

Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each

party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal

Claims judge.
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 21, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 36859]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13223]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

[Notice-MRB-2022-02; Docket No. 2022-0002; Sequence No. 6]

Notice of Establishment of a Federal Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Office of Government-wide Policy (OGP), General Services 
Administration (GSA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) is announcing 
the establishment of the GSA Acquisition Policy Federal Advisory 
Committee (hereinafter ``the Committee'' or ``the GAP FAC'') in 
accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(FACA).

DATES: June 21, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Boris Arratia, OGP, 703-795-0816, or 
Stephanie Hardison, OGP, 202-258-6823, or email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Administrator of GSA established the GSA 
Acquisition Policy Federal Advisory Committee (GAP FAC) as a 
discretionary advisory committee under agency authority in accordance 
with the provisions of FACA (5 U.S.C. App 2). GSA has determined that 
the establishment of GAP FAC is necessary and in the public interest.
    As America's buyer, GSA is uniquely positioned to enable a modern, 
accessible, and streamlined acquisition ecosystem and a robust 
marketplace connecting buyers to the suppliers and businesses that meet 
their mission needs. The GAP FAC will assist GSA in this endeavor 
through expert advice on a broad range of innovative solutions to 
acquisition policy, workforce and industry partnership challenges.
    The GAP FAC will serve as an advisory body to GSA's Administrator 
on how GSA can use its acquisition tools and authorities to target the 
highest priority Federal acquisition challenges. The GAP FAC will 
advise GSA's Administrator on emerging acquisition issues, challenges, 
and opportunities to support its role as America's buyer. The initial 
focus for the GAP FAC will be on driving regulatory, policy, and 
process changes required to embed climate and sustainability 
considerations in Federal acquisition. This includes examining and 
recommending steps GSA can take to support its workforce and industry 
partners in ensuring climate and sustainability issues are fully 
considered in the acquisition process. In accordance with FACA, the 
charter for the Committee will be filed with the appropriate entities 
no earlier than 15 calendar days following the date of publication of 
this notice.

Krystal Brumfield,
Associate Administrator, Office of Government-wide Policy, General 
Services Administration.
[FR Doc. 2022-13223 Filed 6-17-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-61-P
```
KANSAS, Petitioner v. Ramiro GARCIA ; Kansas, Petitioner v. Donaldo Morales; and Kansas, Petitioner v. Guadalupe Ochoa-Lara

No. 17-834

Supreme Court of the United States.

September 11, 2019

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted.
Order entered December 19, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 14
- 01218
- CV STARWOOD MANAGEMENT, LLC, BY AND THROUGH NORMA GONZALEZ, Appellant
V. DON SWAIM , ET AL. , Appellee s On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial Dist rict Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 13
- 12760
- L 

### O RDER
We GRANT appellant’s December 17, 2014 unopposed second motion for an extension of time to file a brief. Appellant shall file a brief by JANUARY 26, 2015 . We caution appellant th at no further extension of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
N OTE : This d isposition is n onprecedential.



# United **S tates**  **Court of** 

**A ppeals**  **for th e**  **Federal Circuit**

______________________
AZURITY

PHA RMACEUTICALS, I NC., Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

BIONPHARMA

I NC., Defendant

- Appellee

______________________
2021

- 1926, 202 1

- 1927

______________________ Appeals from the United States District Co urt for the District of Delaware in No s . 1:18 -c v -0 1962 -L PS, 1:19

- cv -0 1067 -L PS, Judge Leonard P. Stark.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________
R ICHARD T ORCZON , Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, PC, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff

- appellant. Also represented by T Y W ILLIAM C ALLAHAN , G RANVILLE C LAYTON K

AUFMAN , Los Angeles, CA; W ENDY L. D EVINE , N ICHOLAS S YLVESTER H ALKOWSKI , K RISTINA M. H ANSON , San Francisco, CA; N ATALIE J. M ORGAN , San Diego, CA

.
A NDREW M. A LUL , Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for defendant

- appellee. Also represented by R OSHAN S HRESTHA

. Case: 21-1926 Document: 48 Page: 1 Filed: 03/09/2022______________________
T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (N EWMAN , C LEVENGER , and S TOLL , Circuit Judges ).
AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

March 9, 2022 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court Case: 21-1926 Document: 48 Page: 2 Filed: 03/09/2022
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 27, 2009 

p0120 

Order 

 

January 27, 2009 

137654 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 137654 

 COA: 277852 

Monroe CC: 06-035638-FH 

IRA STEPHEN MCCOY, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 16, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
IA 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 54 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating 

to the use of foreign law as authority in Federal courts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 24, 2013 

Mr. CULBERSON (for himself, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of 

Texas, Mr. GOWDY, and Mr. MULVANEY) introduced the following joint 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States relating to the use of foreign law as authority 

in Federal courts. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 54 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Any legal opinion or ruling issued by 

3 any court in the United States, including those rulings and 

4 opinions issued by the Supreme Court of the United 

5 States, shall be based only on the United States Constitu6 tion, or on duly enacted statutes and domestic case law 

7 of the United States or any State and shall not be based 

8 on international laws, treaties, or religious laws. 

9 ‘‘SECTION 2. Any action of a court in violation of sec10 tion 1 is null and void.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7887** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. ROBERTO E. DELEON , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore
. Richard D. Bennett , District Judge. ( 1:09

- cr - 00095

- RDB

- 1 ; 1:15

- cv - 00299

- RDB )

Submitted : March 30, 2016 Decided: April 6, 2016

Before NIEMEYER , WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
C. Justin Brown , LAW OFFICE OF C. JUSTIN BROWN , Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Paul E. Budlow , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Paul Michael Cunningham, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpubli shed opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Roberto E. DeLeon seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Co ckrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a const itutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that
DeLeon has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argumen t would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Eastern District of Texas

1/18/2024

Case 2:24-cv-00024-JRG Document 5 Filed 01/18/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 41
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) . I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

Other (specify):

. My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 2:24-cv-00024-JRG Document 5 Filed 01/18/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 42
Reginald LACEY, Petitioner v. David GOMEZ, Warden

No. 19-5555

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.