alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment No. 5 to the Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan



  
 Exhibit 10.28.4

  
 AMENDMENT NO. FIVE TO THE 
 ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER & CO. RESTATED 1989 NON-EMPLOYEE 
 DIRECTORS’ STOCK OPTION PLAN 
  
 THIS AMENDMENT NO. FIVE to the ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER & CO. 1989 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS’ STOCK OPTION PLAN (as restated January 22, 1998), dated January 23, 2003, is made by Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., a
Delaware corporation (the “Company”). 
  
 WHEREAS, the
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. 1989 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”) was adopted by the Company’s Board of Directors and approved by the Company’s Stockholders in 1989; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company’s Board of Directors has determined that the Plan
should be amended to increase the number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock subject to the Plan by 600,000 from 1,325,000 to 1,925,000 shares. 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and in order to reflect the approval of the Board of Directors of the Company: 
  
 1. The first sentence of Section 4 of the Plan is hereby amended in its
entirety to read as follows: 
  
 “The shares that may be
made subject to Options under the Plan shall be shares of common stock, one dollar ($1.00) par value (“Common Stock”), of the Company, and the total number of shares subject to the Options and issued pursuant to this Plan shall not exceed,
in the aggregate, 1,925,000 shares of the Common Stock of the Company.” 
  
 2. Except as expressly amended and supplemented by this Amendment, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused its President and Secretary to execute this Amendment No. Five to the Plan as of the 23rd day of January, 2003.


			
	ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER & CO.
		
	By:	 	/S/    J. PATRICK GALLAGHER, JR        
	 	 	

	 	 	 J. Patrick Gallagher, Jr.
 President



  

	
	ATTEST:
	
	/S/    JOHN C. ROSENGREN        
	

	 John C. Rosengren
 Secretary
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. 

JOSE MARIA DE LA CRUZ-AJTUN,

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NUMBER 4:23-CR-00134-ALM

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS

OF FACT AND RECOMMMENDATION ON GUILTY PLEA

The Court referred this matter to the United States Magistrate Judge for administration of 

a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a 

hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court accept

Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment.

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings.

Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendation, the Court hereby 

ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States 

Magistrate Judge and accepts Defendant’s guilty plea. It is further ORDERED that, in accordance 

with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the Magistrate Judge’s findings, Defendant is adjudged guilty 

as to Count One of the Indictment, charging a violation of Title 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b) -

Reentry of a Deported Alien.

Case 4:23-cr-00134-ALM-KPJ Document 20 Filed 11/27/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 51
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1061 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Direct Black 22. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2013 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Direct Black 

22. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DIRECT BLACK 22. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.25.25 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Direct Black 22) is amended by striking the date in the 

7 effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2016’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1061 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Ronald TUTTLE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5822

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





I, B. Sonny Bal, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Amedica Corporation;


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:


(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


(b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;


(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and


5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.





Date: December 17, 2015  By:   /s/ B. Sonny Bal


B. Sonny Bal


Chief Executive Officer
Joshua Eric TOWNLEY, Petitioner v. TEXAS.

No. 19-5846

Supreme Court of the United States.

Nov. 4, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District denied.
Independent Auditors' Report



To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
of Zenix Income Fund Inc.:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements of the Zenix
Income Fund Inc. (the "Fund") for the year ended March 31, 2001, we considered
its internal control, including control activities for safeguarding
securities, in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of
expressing our opinion on the financial statements and to comply with the
requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and maintaining
internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments
by management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs
of controls.  Generally, controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the
entity's objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. Those controls include the
safeguarding of assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, error or fraud may occur
and not be detected.  Also, projection of any evaluation of internal control
to future periods is subject to the risk that it may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily disclose all
matters in internal control that might be material weaknesses under standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A
material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of one or
more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low
level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in amounts that
would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited may
occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal
course of performing their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters
involving internal control and its operation, including controls for
safeguarding securities, that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined
above as of March 31, 2001.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of management, the
Board of Directors of the Fund, and the Securities and Exchange Commission and
is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these
specified parties.




New York, New York
May 8, 2001
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6106

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DONALD MCDUFFIN WILLIAMS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:16-cr-00165-GLR-1; 1:19-cv-02378-GLR)

Submitted: August 12, 2020 Decided: August 14, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, KING, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald McDuffin Williams, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Donald McDuffin Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief 

on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by showing that reasonable jurists could find the district 

court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 137 

S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that 

the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. 

Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny the 

motion for remand, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 21, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36888-36889]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13144]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for International Science and Engineering 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the 
following meeting:
    Name and Committee Code: Advisory Committee for International 
Science and Engineering (#25104).
    Date and Time: July 11, 2022, 10:00 a.m.-3:00 p.m. (Eastern Time).
    Place: NSF, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314/Virtual.
    Connect to the Virtual Meeting: To attend the AC-ISE virtual 
meeting, all visitors must process the meeting registration via Zoom:

[[Page 36889]]

    Register in advance for the meeting at the Zoom attendee 
registration link: https://nsf.zoomgov.com/webinar/register/WN_055Jp5i2RUyXryCFid6wpw. After registering, you will receive a 
confirmation email with a unique link to join the meeting.
    If you have any login questions, please contact Kirk Grabowski, 
OISE IT Specialist: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#660d011407040911152607151509050f071203154808150048010910"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a8c3cfdac9cac7dfdbe8c9dbdbc7cbc1c9dccddb86c6dbce86cfc7de">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Christopher Street, National Science Foundation, 
2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314. Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#81e2f2f5f3e4e4f5c1eff2e7afe6eef7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="294a5a5d5b4c4c5d69475a4f074e465f">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice, recommendations and counsel 
on major goals and policies pertaining to engineering programs and 
activities.

Agenda

[ssquf] Updates on OISE activities
[ssquf] Review of OISE Programs & Broadening Diversity of Institutions
[ssquf] Review of Diplomatic Activities
[ssquf] Meet with NSF leadership

    Dated: June 14, 2022.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2022-13144 Filed 6-17-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4405 — Walter Frey Holding/Mitsubishi Motors Europe)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(2006/C 230/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

(2)OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.

----
Sammie Lee SMITH, IV, Petitioner v. FLORIDA

No. 19-5913

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 21, 2019

*446Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District denied.
EXHIBIT 31.b

I, Marc N. Teal, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BCTC V Assignor Corp. (the "Assignor");
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|August 14, 2007 | /s/ Marc N. Teal                                    
|--------------- | ----------------------------------------------------
|                | Marc N. Teal                                        
|                | (Principal Financial Officer), BCTC V Assignor Corp.
|                |
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 21, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 36910]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13187]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 11764]


Proposal To Extend Cultural Property Agreement Between the United 
States and Belize

ACTION: Public notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Proposal to extend the Memorandum of Understanding Between the 
Government of the United States of America and the Government of Belize 
Concerning the Imposition of Import Restrictions on Categories of 
Archaeological Material of Belize.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Zonderman, Cultural Heritage 
Center, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs: (202) 718-9481; 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ceadbba2bebca1be8ebdbaafbaabe0a9a1b8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1370667f63617c635360677267763d747c65">[email protected]</span></a>; include ``Belize'' in the subject line.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Assistant Secretary of State for 
Educational and Cultural Affairs proposes an extension of the 
Memorandum of Understanding Between the Government of the United States 
of America and the Government of Belize Concerning the Imposition of 
Import Restrictions on Categories of Archaeological Material of Belize. 
The Cultural Heritage Center website provides instructions for public 
comment and additional information on the request, including categories 
of material that may be included in import restrictions: https://eca.state.gov/cultural-property-advisory-committee-meeting-july-26-27-2022. This notice is published pursuant to authority vested in the 
Assistant Secretary of State for Educational and Cultural Affairs and 
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 2602(f)(1).

Allison Davis,
Executive Director, Cultural Property Advisory Committee, Bureau of 
Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2022-13187 Filed 6-17-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Abid NASEER, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6700

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
James MCINTOSH, Petitioner v. Mark KIRBY, Warden, et al.

No. 19M71

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.

Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
Jose GOMEZ-AGUILAR, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6397

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Physicians Formula Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Jeff M. Berry, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.





Date: August 6, 2010





By:
/s/ Jeff M. BerryName:
Jeff M. BerryTitle:
Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Physicians Formula Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Physicians Formula Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2017384EN.01001302.xml

| 14.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 384/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 384/13

---

THE OFFICE OF THE BODY OF EUROPEAN REGULATORS FOR ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2016

(2017/C 384/49)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://berec.europa.eu/eng/document_register/subject_matter/berec_office/budget_of_the_office/final_accounts/7144-berec-office-annual-accounts-for-2016

---
# C_2018045EN.01000501.xml

| 7.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/5

---

Corrigendum to the Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 3 of 5 January 2018
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 3 of 5 January 2018

(2018/C 45/07)

On page 3, case SA.47973 (2017/N), entry in the table for ‘Form of aid’:

for:

for

‘Direct grant/Interest rate subsidy’,

read:

read

‘Direct grant’.

---