alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Ex Parte Nii

- Otabil Nelson

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 7

- 00 152

- C R

Trial court case number: 137 2 073

- B

Trial court: 182nd District Court of Harris County

On March 28, 2017, th is Court ’s Memo Opinion dismissed for want of jurisdiction appellant’s appeal of the denial of his second application for a writ of habeas corpus

. On April 18, 2017, this Court granted the motion to extend time to file appellant’s motion for rehearing filed by the pro se appellant, Nii

- Otabil Nelson, until May 18, 2017. On May 19, 2017, the Clerk of this Court received, but did not file, “Appellant’s Opening Brief”

on the merits submitted by appellant’s counsel, Alphonsus O. Ezeoke, who has not filed a notice of appearance.

However, because this is a Rule 31 appeal from the denial of a habeas application, this Court must first request br iefing on the merits before an appellant may file such a brief, and no such request was made here. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 31.1 (stating that “[w]hen the appellate court receives the record, the court will

— if it desires briefs

— set the time for filing briefs, and will set the appeal for submission.”). Also, appellant’s brief was filed one day past the deadline without a second extension request. See id. 49.1, 49.8.

Accordingly, unless appellant files a motion for rehearing, only addressing this

Court’s Memo Opinion, along with a second motion for an extension of time to file his motion for rehearing reasonably explaining his failure to timely file the rehearing motion,

within 10 d a y s of th e date of this O rder

, appellant’s “Opening B rief ” w ill b e stricke n

. See T EX

. R

. A P P

. P. 38.9(a) ; cf. id. 42.3 ( c).

It is so ORDERED. Judge’ s signature:

_

/s/ Laura Carter Higley

_  Acting individually

Date: May 25, 2017
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1995

DOUGLAS STAUFFER BELL; NANCY CLARK BELL,

Petitioners - Appellants,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 001973-10L)

Submitted: January 18, 2018 Decided: January 22, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Douglas Stauffer Bell, Nancy Clark Bell, Appellants Pro Se. Kathleen E. Lyon, UNITED 

STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Douglas Stauffer Bell and Nancy Clark Bell seek to appeal the tax court’s order 

dismissing in part, and remanding in part to the Internal Revenue Service Office of 

Appeals, their petition in the underlying collection due process proceeding. This court 

may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain 

interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen 

v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order the Bells seek 

to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. 

Accordingly, we grant the Commissioner’s motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Levar Lee Anthony SPENCE, Petitioner, v. Tom MCGINLEY, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Coal Township, et al.

No. 19-5590

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 10.11


January 2, 2004

Joerg H. Klaube
Magnitude Information Systems, Inc.
401 State Route 24
Chester, New Jersey 07930


Dear Mr. Klaube:

Please be advised that  vFinance  Investments,  Inc. has  introduced a number of
prospective  investors  to your company  (Magnitude  Information  Systems)  with
regard to the current Unit offering being offered by your company.  Should these
investors  elect  to  invest  in  this  offering,  please  use  this  letter  as
confirmation  that our firm  will be  entitled  to a 10% cash and  common  stock
coverage  at a rate of one share for every ten shares of common  stock for which
the preferred stock offered in the Units is convertible  into (by way of example
a preferred investment  convertible into 100 shares of common would yield equity
coverage  of 10 common  shares to  vFinance).  vFinance  is solely  acting in an
introductory  capacity and any and all decisions  made by investors will be as a
result of  disclosures  provided by your company  directly to those  prospective
investors.

Please  also be advised  that  vFinance  is a member in good  standing  with the
National  Association of Securities  Dealers and is qualified  under federal law
and the laws of the states in which  prospective sales through our introductions
may be made.

If this meets with your approval please sign and return to vFinance Investments,
Inc. and we will provide a schedule of introductions.

                                   Sincerely,

AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY


/s/ Richard Galterio               /s/ Joerg H. Klaube
----------------------             -------------------------------
Richard Galterio                   Joerg H. Klaube
Managing Director                  Chief Financial Officer
Matt A. ROGERS, Petitioner, v. SWEPI LP, et al.

No. 18-1565

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32(b)** **CERTIFICATION    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED    PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF    2002**     In connection with the filing of this quarterly report on    Form 10-Q    of TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. (the “Company”) for    the period ended September 29, 2006, with the Securities    and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the    “Report”), I, Joseph S. Cantie, Chief Financial    Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.    Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of    the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and     2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,    in all material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of the Company.      By: /s/  JOSEPH    S. CANTIE    Joseph S. Cantie*Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer    (Principal Financial Officer)*    Date:  November 1, 2006
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         June 16, 2022.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on June 10, 2022, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 747 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2022-67, CP2022-73.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2022-12945 Filed 6-15-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Independent Auditors' Consent



To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of 
Smith Barney Income Funds:

We consent to the use of our report dated February 7, 1997 with respect to 
Smith Barney Premium Total Return Fund of Smith Barney Income Funds 
incorporated herein by reference and to the references to our Firm under the 
headings "Financial Highlights" in the amended Prospectus and "Counsel and 
Auditors" in the Statement of Additional Information.





	
   

	KPMG Peat Marwick LLP		


New York, New York	
April 25, 1997
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23 - 50442 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff
— Appellee **,** versus **Martin Barro -**  **Chaparro,** Defendant
— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:23 - CR - 4 - 2

**__________________ ____________**  Before **Willett, Duncan,** and **Douglas,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The attorney appointed to represent Martin Barro - Chaparro has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Barro - Chaparro has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief an d the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 6, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-50442 Document: 00516991624 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/06/2023No. 23 - 50442

2 concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from furt her responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED** . See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2 . Case: 23-50442 Document: 00516991624 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/06/2023
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                   GREENPOINT FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                QUARTER ENDED
                                                                   MARCH 31,
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)                        2001          2000
=====================================================================================
<S>                                                               <C>           <C>
Net income                                                    $   78.1      $   57.9
=====================================================================================

Weighted average number of common
   shares outstanding during each year - basic                    88.3          91.5

Weighted average number of common
   shares and common stock equivalents
   outstanding during each year - diluted                         90.5          92.5

Basic earnings per share                                      $    0.88     $    0.63
=====================================================================================

Diluted earnings per share                                    $    0.86     $    0.63
=====================================================================================
</TABLE>
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 597 

To permit the collection of clothing, toys, food, and housewares during the 

holiday season for charitable purposes in Senate buildings. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 15, 2012 

Mrs. MURRAY (for herself and Mr. BURR) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To permit the collection of clothing, toys, food, and 

housewares during the holiday season for charitable purposes in Senate buildings. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. COLLECTION OF CLOTHING, TOYS, FOOD, AND 

3 HOUSEWARES DURING THE HOLIDAY SEASON 

4 FOR CHARITABLE PURPOSES IN SENATE 

5 BUILDINGS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi7 sion of the rules or regulations of the Senate— 

8 (1) a Senator, officer of the Senate, or em9 ployee of the Senate may collect from another Sen10 ator, officer of the Senate, or employee of the Senate 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•SRES 597 ATS 

1 within Senate buildings nonmonetary donations of 

2 clothing, toys, food, and housewares for charitable 

3 purposes related to serving persons in need or mem4 bers of the Armed Forces and the families of those 

5 members during the holiday season, if the charitable 

6 purposes do not otherwise violate any rule or regula7 tion of the Senate or of Federal law; and 

8 (2) a Senator, officer of the Senate, or em9 ployee of the Senate may work with a nonprofit or10 ganization with respect to the delivery of donations 

11 described under paragraph (1). 

12 (b) EXPIRATION.—The authority provided by this 

13 resolution shall expire at the end of the second session 

14 of the 112th Congress. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with
Jeffrey Guy RINGLE, Petitioner v. Shane JACKSON, Warden.

No. 19-6023

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

*565Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018269EN.01003201.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 31.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/32 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.8986 — EIH/Krone-Mur/Primavia)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 269/18)

1.

On 23 July 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018269EN.01003201-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Europe Intermodal Holding (‘EIH’, France), belonging to the group SNCF Mobilités (France), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Krone-Mur Servifrío S.L. (‘Krone-Mur’, Spain), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Primavia Europe S.L. (‘Primavia’, Spain), controlled by Krone-Mur. |

EIH and Krone-Mur acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Primavia.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for EIH: provision of intermodal and multimodal freight transportation services,

—   for Krone-Mur: provision of freight transportation services,

—   for Primavia: provision of international combined road and rail refrigerated transport services mainly of perishable goods between Spain and Northern Europe.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018269EN.01003201-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.8986 — EIH/Krone-Mur/Primavia

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018269EN.01003201-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018269EN.01003201-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
Melissa EDWARDS, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION

No. 19-6212

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Michigan denied.
C. B., Petitioner v. Thomas N. FISCHGRUND

No. 19-6219

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District denied.
5. Miscellaneous.          (a) This Amendment is a legal and binding obligation of the parties,enforceable in accordance with its terms.          (b) This Amendment shall be construed in accordance with the internal lawsand not the choice of law provisions of the State of Indiana.          (c) Except as specifically amended hereby, the Agreement shall remain in fullforce and effect. In the event the terms of the Agreement conflict with this Amendment, theterms of this Amendment shall control.          (d) Except as otherwise provided herein, this Amendment contains the entireunderstanding between the parties, and there are no other agreements or understandings betweenthe parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. No alteration or modification hereofshall be valid except by a subsequent written instrument executed by the parties hereto.          (e) This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, andeach such counterpart shall be deemed to be an original instrument, but all such counterpartstogether shall constitute only one agreement. Any facsimile of this Amendment shall beconsidered an original document.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has dulyexecuted this Amendment to the Agreement as of the date first set forth above.      **BRIGHTPOINT, INC.**
Richard JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5883

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Raphael PERSON, Jr., Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5681

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Benjamin Justin BROWNLEE, Petitioner v. CALIFORNIA

No. 19-5994

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District denied.
##### Form 10-Q Table of Contents

Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of SeaBright Insurance Holdings, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John G. Pasqualetto,
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 10, 2007

| |  |  |                                                                                            
| |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |  | /s/ John G. PasquqalettoJohn G. PasquqalettoChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to SeaBright Insurance Holdings, Inc. and will
be retained by SeaBright Inhsurance Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18U.S.C.,SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, Darren C. Dunckel, the undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer of Atomic Paintball Inc., (the “Company”), herby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Dated: July 1, 2014
/s/ Darren C. DunckelPresident, CEO and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
Amando Villarreal HEREDIA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5856

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/21/14          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      422,049
COMMITMENTS
 114,419  112,699  130,408  153,002  154,069  397,829  397,176   24,220   24,873

CHANGES FROM 10/14/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     14,233)
  10,589    4,870   14,854   -6,788    1,607   18,655   21,331   -4,422   -7,098

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    27.1     26.7     30.9     36.3     36.5     94.3     94.1      5.7      5.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      193)
      70       57       83       43       43      158      153
```

----

Updated October 24, 2014