alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000919557
<NAME> ALLIANCE GROWTH PORTFOLIO
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER> 002
   <NAME> TRAVELERS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                    1,107,814,942
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                   1,459,836,327
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,994,600
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                   8,951
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,461,839,878
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                    47,441,061
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                      901,321
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                         48,342,382
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                      0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                   826,429,849
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                       43,324,200
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                       41,126,607
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                    2,915,277
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                    232,072,338
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                   352,080,032
<NET-ASSETS>                             1,413,497,496
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                            4,509,209
<INTEREST-INCOME>                            2,303,633
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                               5,446,683
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                      1,366,159
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                   127,799,814
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                   48,090,767
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                      177,256,740
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                            0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                      2,749,821
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                    552,228
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                                  0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                     247,583,557
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                      1,549,118
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                  104,272,524
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                        5,343,268
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                              5,446,683
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                     1,347,213,059
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                            28.35
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                   0.03
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                           4.25
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                              0.00
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                         0.00
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                              0.00
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                              32.63
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                   0.81


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1075 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1075

   To amend title 10, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
          Defense to provide support for Boy Scout Jamborees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 12, 2013

Mr. McKinley (for himself, Mr. Rahall, and Mrs. Capito) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 10, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
          Defense to provide support for Boy Scout Jamborees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SUPPORT FOR BOY SCOUT JAMBOREES.

    Section 2554 of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``is hereby authorized'' and 
                inserting ``shall'';
                    (B) by striking ``to lend to'' and inserting ``lend 
                to''; and
                    (C) by striking ``to the extent that such items are 
                in stock and items or services are available'';
            (2) in subsection (d)--
                    (A) by striking ``is hereby authorized'' and 
                inserting ``shall'';
                    (B) by striking ``to provide'' and inserting 
                ``provide''; and
                    (C) in paragraph (2), by striking ``the 
                requirements of military operations'' and inserting 
                ``the national security of the United States''; and
            (3) in subsection (g), by striking ``may provide'' and 
        inserting ``shall provide''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 116 (Thursday, June 16, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 36357]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12932]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Delegation of Authority No. 524-2]


Delegation of Authorities Under Section 102 of the Mutual 
Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961

    By virtue of the authority vested in the Assistant Secretary of 
State for Educational and Cultural Affairs, including by Delegation of 
Authority No. 236-3 (August 28, 2000), and to the extent permitted by 
law, I hereby delegate to the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Private 
Sector Exchange and the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and 
Cultural Exchanges the authorities and functions in section 102 of the 
Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2452), 
relating to the provision by grant, contract or otherwise for 
educational and cultural exchanges.
    Any authorities covered by this delegation may also be exercised by 
the Secretary, the Deputy Secretary, the Deputy Secretary for 
Management and Resources, the Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and 
Public Affairs, and the Assistant Secretary for Educational and 
Cultural Affairs.
    This Delegation of Authority does not revoke or otherwise affect 
any other delegation of authority currently in effect.
    Any reference in this Delegation of Authority to any statute or 
delegation of authority shall be deemed to be a reference to such 
statute or delegation of authority as amended from time to time.
    This Delegation shall be published in the Federal Register.

Lee A. Satterfield,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, U.S. 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2022-12932 Filed 6-15-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
**
**Exhibit 12.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Grigorii Moiseev,Chief Financial Officer, certify that: 

 
 1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of HeadHunter GroupPLC; 

 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 
 4.
The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

 
 (a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

 
 (b)
[intentionally omitted]; 

 
 (c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 
 (d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 
 5.
The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 
 (a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 
 (b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 
Date: March 13, 2020  By: 
/s/ Grigorii Moiseev
   Grigorii Moiseev   
**Chief Financial Officer**

***(Principal Financial Officer)***
**
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 21


                                G&L Realty Corp.
                              List of Subsidiaries
                                 April 30, 1999


1.   AV Medical Associates, LLC, a California limited liability company
2.   G&L Hampden, Inc., a Delaware corporation
3.   G&L Hampden, LLC a Delaware limited liability company
4.   G&L Realty Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
5.   G&L Realty Financing II, Inc., a Delaware corporation
6.   G&L Realty Financing Partnership II, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
7.   G&L Medical, Inc., a Delaware corporation
8.   G&L Gardens, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company
9.   G&L Management Delaware Corp., a Delaware corporation
10.  G&L Senior Care, Inc., a Delaware corporation
11.  G&L Medical Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
12.  GLN Capital Co. LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
13.  GL/PHP, LLC a Delaware limited liability company
14.  Theme World, L.P., a New Jersey limited partnership
15.  Valley Convalescent, LLC, a California limited liability company
16.  435 N. Roxbury Drive, Ltd., a California limited partnership
17.  G&L/M&Z Aliso Partners, a California general partnership
18.  G&L - Grabel San Pedro, LLC
19.  G&L Burbank, LLC
20.  G&L Burbank Managers Corp., a California corporation
21.  G&L Holy Cross, LLC
22.  G&L Holy Cross Managers Corp., a California corporation
23.  G&L Tustin, LLC
24.  G&L Tustin Managers Corp., a California corporation
25.  G&L Valencia, LLC
26.  G&L Penasquitos, LLC
27.  G&L Penasquitos, Inc.
28.  GLH Pacific Gardens, LLC
29.  GLH Pacific Gardens Corp., a California corporation
30.  G&L Hoquiam, LLC
31.  G&L Lyon, LLC
32.  G&L Coronado (1998), LLC
33.  G&L Parsons on Eagle Run, LLC
34.  G&L Parsons on Eagle Run, Inc.
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPERSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PERSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SteinwayMusical Instruments, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedJune 28, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Dennis M. Hanson, Senior Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
|            | /s/ Dennis M. Hanson                                                                        |   |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|            |                                                                                        |
|            | Senior Executive Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Financial Officer) |
|            |
|            |
| August 11, 2003 |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Steinway Musical Instruments, Inc. and willbe retained by Steinway Musical Instruments, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/22/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      350,915
COMMITMENTS
  88,431  131,728   80,836  161,763  112,710  331,030  325,274   19,885   25,641

CHANGES FROM 10/15/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -11,285)
  18,409   -1,908   -1,167  -26,561   -9,224   -9,319  -12,299   -1,966    1,014

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    25.2     37.5     23.0     46.1     32.1     94.3     92.7      5.7      7.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      173)
      56       67       70       32       39      131      142
```

----

Updated November 1, 2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND IS
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           55135                     479
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    45033                   39807
<ALLOWANCES>                                       350                     350
<INVENTORY>                                      68732                   58694
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                172917                  101882
<PP&E>                                           35404                   30869
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  222514                  138632
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            35344                   24651
<BONDS>                                         129985                   63785
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            61                      61
<OTHER-SE>                                       54914                   48629
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    222514                  138632
<SALES>                                         303911                  268937
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                303911                  268937
<CGS>                                           249754                  217341
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   287910                  252111
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                6184                    4025
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   9817                   12801
<INCOME-TAX>                                      3677                    5148
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               6140                    7653
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                      6140                    7653
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.01                    1.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .98                    1.24


</TABLE>
Anton PURISIMA, Petitioner, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA, et al.

No. 19M135.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 4, 2020

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1120 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 15, 2013 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

AN ACT 

To prohibit the National Labor Relations Board from taking 

any action that requires a quorum of the members of 

the Board until such time as Board constituting a 

quorum shall have been confirmed by the Senate, the 

Supreme Court issues a decision on the constitutionality 

of the appointments to the Board made in January 2012, 

or the adjournment sine die of the first session of the 

113th Congress. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1120 RFS 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preventing Greater 

5 Uncertainty in Labor-Management Relations Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ACTIVITIES BY THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS 

7 BOARD PROHIBITED. 

8 Effective on the date of enactment of this Act, the 

9 National Labor Relations Board shall cease all activity 

10 that requires a quorum of the members of the Board, as 

11 set forth in the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 

12 151 et seq.). The Board shall not appoint any personnel 

13 nor implement, administer, or enforce any decision, rule, 

14 vote, or other action decided, undertaken, adopted, issued, 

15 or finalized on or after January 4, 2012, that requires 

16 a quorum of the members of the Board, as set forth in 

17 such Act. 

18 SEC. 3. TERMINATION. 

19 The provisions of this Act shall terminate on the date 

20 on which— 

21 (1) all members of the National Labor Rela22 tions Board are confirmed with the advice and con23 sent of the Senate, in accordance with clause 2 of 

24 section 2 of article II of the Constitution, in a num25 ber sufficient to constitute a quorum, as set forth in 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 1120 RFS 

1 the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 151 et 

2 seq.); 

3 (2) the Supreme Court issues a decision on the 

4 constitutionality of the appointments to the Board 

5 made in January 2012; or 

6 (3) the adjournment sine die of the first session 

7 of the 113th Congress. 

8 SEC. 4. EFFECT OF CERTAIN BOARD ACTIONS. 

9 In the event that this Act terminates pursuant to 

10 paragraph (1) or (3) of section 3, no appointment, deci11 sion, rule, vote, or other action decided, undertaken, 

12 adopted, issued, or finalized by the Board on or after Jan13 uary 4, 2012, that requires authorization by not less than 

14 a quorum of the members of the Board, as set forth in 

15 the National Labor Relations Act, may be implemented, 

16 administered, or enforced unless and until it is considered 

17 and acted upon by a Board constituting a quorum, as set 

18 forth in the National Labor Relations Act, or the Supreme 

19 Court issues a decision on the constitutionality of the ap20 pointments to the Board made in January 2012. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 12, 2013. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1186

CECIL D. ADDISON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

VOLVO TRUCKS OF NORTH AMERICA, INCORPORATED, a/k/a Volvo 

Group; IVAN MITCHELL; JOHN PENNINGTON; DAVID LILLY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District 

Judge. (7:09-cv-00088-sgw-mfu)

Submitted: June 17, 2010 Decided: June 24, 2010

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cecil D. Addison, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Wilson Stoker, Eric 

Anthony Welter, WELTER LAW FIRM, PC, Herndon, Virginia, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Cecil D. Addison appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his Title VII complaint for failure to comply with a 

court order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Addison v. Volvo Trucks of N. Am., Inc., No. 

7:09-cv-00088-sgw-mfu (W.D. Va. Feb. 3, 2010). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Angie WALKER, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES;

No. 18-9709

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.