alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Opinion filed April 19, 2012

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

__________

No. 11-11-00267-CV

__________

IN THE INTEREST OF T.J., A CHILD 

On Appeal from the 42nd District Court

Callahan County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 19,521

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a final order signed on September 1, 2011, in a suit affecting the 

parent-child relationship. We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

The clerk of this court notified appellant, K.J., by a written letter dated December 12, 

2011, that his brief was due for filing on or before January 2, 2012. Appellant subsequently filed 

a motion for extension of time to file his brief. The court granted his motion in part by extending 

the deadline until March 1, 2012, in a letter ruling issued on January 5, 2012. On March 20, 

2012, the clerk of this court advised appellant in writing that his brief was past due. The clerk 

further informed appellant that, on its own motion, the court had granted him an extension until 

April 9, 2012, to file his brief. The clerk’s letter of March 20, 2012, further advised appellant 

that the failure to file his brief by April 9, 2012, might result in his appeal being dismissed for 
2

want of prosecution pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8 and 42. There has been no response to the 

clerk’s letter of March 20, 2012. The failure to timely file appellant’s brief appears to be due to 

appellant’s acts and omissions. 

Therefore, pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1) and 42.3(b), the appeal is dismissed for 

want of prosecution.

PER CURIAM

April 19, 2012

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Kalenak, J.
DEKALB BANKSHARES, INC.

                                                                      Exhibit 32
                Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The  undersigned,  who is the chief  executive  officer and the chief  financial
officer of DeKalb  Bankshares,  Inc.,  hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge,  the  accompanying  Form 10-QSB of the issuer fully complies with the
requirements  of Section  13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
and that information  contained in the report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.



Date:  May 12, 2004              /s/ William C. Bochette, III
-------------------                 --------------------------------------------
                                    William C. Bochette, III
                                    Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
                                    Officer
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

June 17, 2005

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL R. FAGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 05-3125

v. (D.C. No. 04-CV-3114-GTV)

(FNU) LINNEMAN, Mental Health

Professional, Corrections Care

Services, El Dorado Correctional

Facility, in his official and private

capacities; and ROGER WERHOLTZ,

Secretary, Kansas Department of

Corrections, in his official and private

capacities,

(D. Kansas)

Defendants-Appellees.

 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before EBEL, McKAY, and HENRY, Circuit Judges.

After examining Appellant’s brief and the appellate record, this panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). 

The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
-2-

This is a pro se civil rights appeal under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In his

complaint, Mr. Fagan asserts that his civil rights were violated by Kansas

Department of Corrections officials (Defendants). Mr. Fagan claims Defendants

violated the Eighth Amendment guarantee against cruel and unusual punishment

by depriving him of adequate medical care for his previously diagnosed bipolar

disorder. The district court dismissed Mr. Fagan’s complaint because he failed to

state a claim for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and entered judgment in

Defendants’ favor. Mr. Fagan appeals to this court. 

We agree with the district court that Mr. Fagan fails to state a cognizable

Eighth Amendment claim. To pursue his § 1983 claim based on such a

constitutional violation, Mr. Fagan must show “deliberate indifference.” Estelle

v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 104 (1976). “Deliberate indifference” occurs when an

official “knows of and disregards an excessive risk to inmate health or safety.” 

Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 837 (1994). Proof of “deliberate indifference”

requires evidence that the pain or deprivation was sufficiently serious and that the

offending official’s state of mind was sufficiently culpable. Wilson v. Seiter, 501

U.S. 294, 298-99 (1991). Mr. Fagan failed to allege facts that meet this two-part

test. Thus, Mr. Fagan’s § 1983 claim is not cognizable.

After a thorough review of Appellant’s brief and the record, and for

substantially the same reasons set forth in the district court’s well-reasoned
-3-

August 9, 2004, order and judgment of dismissal, we hold that Mr. Fagan failed to

state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 

The decision of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court

Monroe G. McKay

Circuit Judge
IN RE Donna SNELLER, Petitioner

No. 19-5094

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 4.6    
    


 
 

PLEDGE SUPPLEMENT    
    


        This PLEDGE SUPPLEMENT, dated as of December 12, 2003, is delivered by UAE Ref-Fuel II Corp, a Delaware corporation, (the
"New Grantor") pursuant to the Pledge and Security Agreement, dated as of November 24, 2003 (as it may be from time to time amended, restated,
modified or supplemented, the "Security Agreement"), among MSW Energy Holdings II LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, MSW Energy Finance Co.
II, Inc., a Delaware corporation, the other Grantors named therein, and Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A., as the Collateral Agent. Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined herein
shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Security Agreement. 


        New
Grantor hereby confirms the grant to the Collateral Agent set forth in the Security Agreement of, and does hereby grant to the Collateral Agent, a security interest in all of New
Grantor's right, title and interest in and to all Collateral to secure the Secured Obligations and New Grantor's guarantee of the Notes or the obligations of the Company under the Indenture whether
now or hereafter existing or in which New Grantor now has or hereafter acquires an interest and wherever the same may be located. From and after the date hereof, New Grantor shall be a "Grantor" for
all purposes of the Security Agreement. New Grantor hereby makes, as of the date hereof, all of the representations and warranties set forth in the Security Agreement. New Grantor represents and
warrants that the attached Supplements to Schedules accurately and completely set forth all additional information required pursuant to the Security Agreement and hereby agrees that such Supplements
to Schedules shall constitute part of the Schedules to the Security Agreement. 


        Any
notice or other communication shall be sent to New Grantor at the address set forth below. 



155
Chestnut Ridge Road

Montvale, New Jersey 07645

Telephone No.: (201) 690-4802 




        New
Grantor hereby irrevocably appoints the Collateral Agent as New Grantor's attorney-in-fact, with full authority in the place and stead of New Grantor and in
the name of New Grantor, and hereby agrees to be bound by all of the terms, provisions and obligations contained in Section 6 of the Security Agreement. 


        [Signature Page Follows] 





 

        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, New Grantor has caused this Pledge Supplement to be duly executed and delivered by its duly authorized officer as of December 12, 2003. 



	 	 	UAE REF-FUEL II CORP.
	

 	
 	

By:	

/s/  KIRK J. BILY      
 Name: Kirk J. Bily

Title: Assistant Secretary




2









QuickLinks



Exhibit 4.6


PLEDGE SUPPLEMENT
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1119 

To prevent funding provided through the Federal Reserve System from being 

made available to corporations that finance political campaigns or political propaganda, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2013 

Mr. GRAYSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To prevent funding provided through the Federal Reserve 

System from being made available to corporations that 

finance political campaigns or political propaganda, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bailouts Are Not For 

5 Sale Act’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1119 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ACCESS TO THE FEDERAL RE2 SERVE DISCOUNT WINDOW FOR CORPORA3 TIONS WHICH INTERFERE IN ELECTIONS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 13 of the 

5 Federal Reserve Act, any other provision of the Federal 

6 Reserve Act, or any other provision of law, a corporation 

7 which has made any independent expenditure or any dis8 bursement for an electioneering communication, in con9 nection with an election campaign for a Federal office, di10 rectly or through any affiliate, after the date of the enact11 ment of such Act may not have any notes discounted by 

12 any Federal reserve bank and may not otherwise have ac13 cess to or receive the benefit of, directly or indirectly 

14 through any affiliate or third party, any financing pro15 vided by or through the Board or any Federal reserve 

16 bank or any credit facility established by the Board or any 

17 Federal reserve bank. 

18 (b) PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT DURING TRANSI19 TION.—If any corporation subject to subsection (a) has, 

20 before the date of the enactment of this Act, entered into 

21 any transaction or financing arrangement prohibited by 

22 such subsection, the Board shall require the corporation 

23 to unwind the transaction and repay any amount out24 standing as soon as practicable but, in any case, before 

25 the end of the 90-day period beginning on such date of 

26 enactment. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1119 IH

1 (c) REGULATIONS.—Before the end of the 90-day pe2 riod beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, 

3 the Board shall prescribe, in final form, such regulations 

4 as may be appropriate to implement this Act. 

5 (d) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section, the 

6 terms ‘‘Board’’ and ‘‘affiliate’’ have the same meanings 

7 as in section 2 of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956. 

8 (e) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act shall apply as of the 

9 date of the enactment of this Act, without regard to the 

10 effective date of any regulation prescribed under sub11 section (c). 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
SMITH BARNEY INVESTMENT FUNDS INC.
On behalf of
SMITH BARNEY CONTRARIAN FUND

Supplement dated January 7, 2000 to
Prospectus dated April 30, 1999

On January 7, 2000 the Board of Directors of Smith
Barney Investment Funds
Inc, ( the "Board") on behalf of Smith Barney
Contrarian Fund (the "Contrarian Fund"), approved a
proposed reorganization pursuant to which Smith Barney
Fundamental Value Fund Inc.("Fundamental Value Fund")
would acquire the assets of Fund and assume the stated
liabilities of the Contrarian Fund in exchange for
shares of the Fundamental Value.  This reorganization
would permit Contrarian Fund shareholders to maintain
an investment in a fund with the same primary
investment objective.

Under the terms of the proposed reorganization
Contrarian Fund shareholders would receive shares of
the Fundamental Value Fund equal in value to their
investment in the Contrarian Fund in accordance with
the terms of
the reorganization.  Contrarian Fund shareholders
would not be charged a
sales load when Fundamental Value Fund shares are
issued to them and it is
anticipated that no gain or loss for Federal income
tax purposes would be
recognized by shareholders as a result of the
reorganization.

The proposed reorganization is subject to the
fulfillment of certain
conditions, including approval by the shareholders of
the Contrarian
Fund.  Proxy materials describing the proposed
reorganization will be
mailed to Contrarian Fund shareholders in anticipation
of a meeting of
the shareholders expected to be held in May of 2000.
If approved by Contrarian Fund shareholders at that
time, the reorganization will occur as
soon after the meeting as practicable.

In addition, the Board approved the appointment of
John G. Goode as portfolio manager of the Contrarian
Fund, effective immediately.  Mr. Goode is the
portfolio manager of the Fundamental Value Fund, a
Managing Director of Salomon Smith Barney and
President and Chief Investment Officer of Davis Skaggs
Investment Management, a division of SSB Citi Fund
Management LLC.

FD _____
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1058 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Acid Black 194. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2013 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Acid Black 194. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ACID BLACK 194. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Acid Black 194 (CAS No. 

57693–14–8) (provided for 

in subheading 3204.12.20) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2016 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1058 IH

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET-WTI - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                      Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/04/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      469,201
COMMITMENTS
  76,308   47,310  111,840  266,204  298,180  454,352  457,330   14,849   11,871

CHANGES FROM 10/28/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,524)
    -784    3,582   -5,310    5,067    1,109   -1,027     -619     -497     -905

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    16.3     10.1     23.8     56.7     63.6     96.8     97.5      3.2      2.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      135)
      30       29       55       65       66      126      125
```

----

Updated November 7, 2014
Timothy DASLER, Petitioner v. Jennifer DASLER

No. 19-473

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 16, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Vermont denied.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
                                     OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Pete Smith, certify that;

(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Salmon Express Inc.;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

(4) I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
Registrant and have:

   a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

   b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

   c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

(5) I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

   a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
Registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

   b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls; and


(6) I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other facts that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date:  April 14, 2005

                    /s/ Pete Smith
                    ------------------------------
                    Pete Smith
                    Principal Executive Officer
                    Principal Financial Officer
[ARTICLE] 6
[CIK] 0000091157
[NAME] LARGE CAPITAL VALUE FUND - CLASS Y
[SERIES]
   [NUMBER] 001
   [NAME] SMITH BARNEY FUNDS, INC.
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   YEAR
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1999
[PERIOD-END]                               DEC-31-1999
[INVESTMENTS-AT-COST]                    1,019,638,686
[INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE]                   1,311,061,403
[RECEIVABLES]                                8,272,097
[ASSETS-OTHER]                             151,452,968
[OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS]                                 0
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                           1,470,786,468
[PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES]                             0
[SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT]                              0
[OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES]                  162,402,002
[TOTAL-LIABILITIES]                        162,402,002
[SENIOR-EQUITY]                                      0
[PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON]                 1,017,596,617
[SHARES-COMMON-STOCK]                       10,875,356
[SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR]                        8,701,371
[ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT]                     (14,608)
[OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII]                               0
[ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS]                      (620,260)
[OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS]                             0
[ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC]                   291,422,717
[NET-ASSETS]                             1,308,384,466
[DIVIDEND-INCOME]                           26,866,232
[INTEREST-INCOME]                              504,428
[OTHER-INCOME]                                       0
[EXPENSES-NET]                              12,735,714
[NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME]                     14,634,946
[REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT]                    63,929,917
[APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT]                 (96,058,919)
[NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS]                     (17,494,056)
[EQUALIZATION]                                       0
[DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME]                    2,600,448
[DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS]                     9,842,130
[DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER]                                0
[NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD]                      2,202,645
[NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED]                     28,660
[SHARES-REINVESTED]                                  0
[NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS]                       4,969,252
[ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR]                        (8,872)
[ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR]                  (1,074,268)
[OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR]                              0
[OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR]                           0
[GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES]                        7,651,395
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                   0
[GROSS-EXPENSE]                             12,735,714
[AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS]                       180,370,574
[PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN]                            18.28
[PER-SHARE-NII]                                   0.26
[PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC]                         (0.36)
[PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND]                              0.26
[PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS]                         0.91
[RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL]                              0.00
[PER-SHARE-NAV-END]                              17.01
[EXPENSE-RATIO]                                   0.58
</TABLE>