36154 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 115 / Wednesday, June 15, 2022 / Notices 

Type of Meeting: Part-open. 

Contact Person: Dr. Cosima BoswellKoller, Program Director, Division of 

Materials Research, National Science 

Foundation, Room E9475, 2415 

Eisenhower Avenue Alexandria, VA 

22314, Telephone (703) 292–4959. 

Purpose of Meeting: Site visit to 

provide advice and recommendations 

concerning further support of the MIP at 

Cornell University and Johns Hopkins 

University. 

Agenda 

Thursday, July 14, 2022 

8:00 a.m.–9:15 a.m. Executive Session 

(Closed) 

9:15 a.m.–11:30 a.m. Review of 

PARADIM MIP 

11:30 a.m.–1:00 p.m. Executive 

Session (Closed) 

1:00 p.m.–4:00 p.m. Review of 

PARADIM MIP 

4:00 p.m.–8:00 p.m. Executive Session 

(Closed) 

Friday, July 15, 2022 

8:00 a.m.–3:00 p.m. Executive Session 

(Closed) 

Reason for Closing: The work being 

reviewed during closed portions of the 

site review includes information of a 

proprietary or confidential nature, 

including technical information; 

financial data, such as salaries and 

personal information concerning 

individuals associated with PARADIM/ 

MIP. These matters are exempt under 5 

U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the 

Government in the Sunshine Act. 

Dated: June 10, 2022. 

Crystal Robinson, 

Committee Management Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2022–12903 Filed 6–14–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[Docket No. 50–0289; NRC–2022–0115] 

Constellation Energy Generation, LLC; 

Three Mile Island Station, Unit 1 

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission. 

ACTION: Exemption; issuance. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (NRC) is issuing 

exemptions to Constellation Energy 

Generation, LLC (CEG) in response to a 

May 20, 2021, request. The exemptions 

permit CEG to use a portion of the funds 

from the Three Mile Island Station, Unit 

1 (TMI–1) decommissioning trust fund 

(DTF) for site restoration activities at 

TMI–1 without prior notice to the NRC 

in the same manner that withdrawals 

are made under NRC regulations for 

decommissioning activities. 

DATES: The exemptions were issued on 

June 8, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID 

NRC–2022–0115 when contacting the 

NRC about the availability of 

information regarding this document. 

You may obtain publicly available 

information related to this document 

using any of the following methods: 

• Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to 

https://www.regulations.gov and search 

for Docket ID NRC–2022–0115. Address 

questions about Docket IDs in 

Regulations.gov to Stacy Schumann; 

telephone: 301–415–0624; email: 

Stacy.Schumann@nrc.gov. For technical 

questions, contact the individual listed 

in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section of this document. 

• NRC’s Agencywide Documents 

Access and Management System 

(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly 

available documents online in the 

ADAMS Public Documents collection at 

https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ 

adams.html. To begin the search, select 

‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For 

problems with ADAMS, please contact 

the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR) 

reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301– 

415–4737, or by email to 

PDR.Resource@nrc.gov. For the 

convenience of the reader, instructions 

about obtaining materials referenced in 

this document are provided in the 

‘‘Availability of Documents’’ section. 

• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and 

purchase copies of public documents, 

by appointment, at the NRC’s PDR, 

Room P1 B35, One White Flint North, 

11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 

Maryland 20852. To make an 

appointment to visit the PDR, please 

send an email to PDR.Resource@nrc.gov 

or call 1–800–397–4209 or 301–415– 

4737, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. 

Eastern Time (ET), Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Amy Snyder, Office of Nuclear Material 

Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, Washington, 

DC 20555–0001, telephone: 301–415– 

6822, email: Amy.Snyder@nrc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

TMI–1 is a single unit Babcock & 

Wilcox Pressurized Water Reactor. CEG 

is the holder of Renewed Facility 

Operating License (RFOL) No. DPR–50 

for TMI–1. On February 1, 2022, CEG 

notified the NRC that Exelon Generation 

Company, LLC (Exelon) officially 

changed its name to Constellation 

Energy Generation, LLC. By letter dated 

June 20, 2017, per Section 50.82(a)(1)(i) 

of title 10 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations (10 CFR), Exelon certified to 

the NRC that it planned to permanently 

cease power operations at TMI–1 on or 

about September 30, 2019. TMI–1 

subsequently permanently ceased power 

operations on September 20, 2019. By 

letter dated September 26, 2019, 

pursuant to 10 CFR 50.82(a)(1)(ii), 

Exelon certified to the NRC that all fuel 

had been permanently removed from 

the TMI–1 reactor vessel and placed in 

the spent fuel pool as of September 26, 

2019. Accordingly, pursuant to 10 CFR 

50.82(a)(2), the TMI–1 RFOL no longer 

authorizes operation of the reactor or 

emplacement or retention of fuel in the 

reactor vessel. 

By letter dated April 5, 2019, Exelon 

provided to the NRC a Post-Shutdown 

Decommissioning Activities Report 

(PSDAR) for TMI–1. The PSDAR 

reflected the use of a safe storage 

condition (SAFSTOR), thereby 

reflecting plans to complete 

decommissioning within a 60-year 

period after the permanent cessation of 

operations. The PSDAR referenced a 

site-specific decommissioning cost 

estimate (DCE) and an updated Spent 

Fuel Management Plan (SFMP). The 

staff’s review of the PSDAR and SFMP 

concluded that Exelon demonstrated 

reasonable assurance that funding will 

be available to decommission TMI–1 

pursuant to the SAFSTOR method and 

that the activities and associated costs of 

the TMI–1 SFMP appear reasonable. 

Exelon previously received an 

exemption from 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) 

and 10 CFR 50.75(h)(1)(iv) that allows 

use of the TMI–1 DTF for spent fuel 

management at TMI–1. 

II. Request/Action 

By letter dated May 20, 2021, the 

licensee, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, 

‘‘Specific exemptions,’’ submitted a 

request for exemption from the specific 

requirements of 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) 

and 50.75(h)(1)(iv). The exemptions 

from 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) and 10 

CFR 50.75(h)(1)(iv) would permit CEG 

to make withdrawals from the TMI–1 

DTF for site restoration activities at 

TMI–1. The exemption from 10 CFR 

50.75(h)(1)(iv) would also permit the 

licensee to make these withdrawals 

without prior notification to the NRC, 

similar to withdrawals for 

decommissioning activities made in 

accordance with 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8). 

The funds within the TMI–1 DTF 

were collected in compliance with the 

10 CFR 50.75, ‘‘Reporting and 

recordkeeping for decommissioning 

planning,’’ financial requirements while 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 115 / Wednesday, June 15, 2022 / Notices 36155 

TMI–1 was operating. The exemption 

request included a cash-flow analysis 

reflecting the balance of funds within 

the DTF throughout the 

decommissioning period, ending the 

year of license termination in 2081. The 

requirements of 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) 

restrict the use of DTF withdrawals to 

expenses related to legitimate 

decommissioning activities consistent 

with the definition of decommissioning 

in 10 CFR 50.2, ‘‘Definitions.’’ The 

definition of ‘‘decommission’’ in 10 CFR 

50.2 is: to remove a facility or site safely 

from service and reduce residual 

radioactivity to a level that permits—(1) 

Release of the property for unrestricted 

use and termination of the license; or (2) 

Release of the property under restricted 

conditions and termination of the 

license. This definition does not include 

activities associated with spent fuel 

management and site restoration 

activities. The requirements of 10 CFR 

50.75(h)(1)(iv) also restrict the use of 

DTF disbursements (other than for 

ordinary administrative costs and other 

incidental expenses of the fund in 

connection with the operation of the 

fund) to decommissioning expenses 

until final radiological 

decommissioning is completed. 

Therefore, an exemption from 10 CFR 

50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) and 10 CFR 

50.75(h)(1)(iv) is needed to allow CEG to 

use funds from the TMI–1 DTF for site 

restoration activities at TMI–1. 

The requirements of 10 CFR 

50.75(h)(1)(iv) further provide that, 

except for withdrawals being made 

under 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8) or for 

payments of ordinary administrative 

costs and other incidental expenses of 

the fund in connection with the 

operation of the fund, no disbursement 

may be made from the DTF without 

written notice to the NRC at least 30 

working days in advance. Therefore, an 

exemption from 10 CFR 50.75(h)(1)(iv) 

is also needed to allow CEG to use funds 

from the TMI–1 DTF for site restoration 

activities at TMI–1 without prior NRC 

notification. 

The licensee has concluded that 10 

CFR 50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) and 10 CFR 

50.75(h)(1)(iv) would prohibit use of 

DTFs for activities related to site 

restoration prior to completion of 

radiological decommissioning. The 

licensee anticipates maintaining TMI–1 

in SAFSTOR for an extended period 

prior to completion of radiological 

decommissioning. This will allow 

radioactive decay to occur, thereby 

reducing the quantity of contamination 

and radioactivity that must be disposed 

of during the decontamination and 

dismantlement process as well as 

reducing the associated occupational 

exposure. Exemptions from 10 CFR 

50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) and 10 CFR 

50.75(h)(1)(iv) are requested to allow the 

licensee to withdraw and use funds 

from the DTF for site restoration 

activities. The exemptions would cover 

all site restoration activities at TMI–1. 

III. Discussion 

A. The Exemption is Authorized by Law 

The requested exemption from 10 

CFR 50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) and 10 CFR 

50.75(h)(1)(iv) would allow CEG to use 

a portion of the funds from the TMI–1 

DTF for site restoration activities at 

TMI–1 without prior notice to the NRC 

in the same manner that withdrawals 

are made under 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8) for 

decommissioning activities. As 

previously stated, 10 CFR 50.12 allows 

the NRC to grant exemptions from the 

requirements of 10 CFR part 50 when 

the exemptions are authorized by law. 

The NRC staff has determined that 

granting CEG’s proposed exemption will 

not result in a violation of the Atomic 

Energy Act of 1954, as amended, or the 

Commission’s regulations. Therefore, 

the exemption is authorized by law. 

B. The Exemption Presents no Undue 

Risk to Public Health and Safety 

The underlying purpose of 10 CFR 

50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) and 10 CFR 

50.75(h)(1)(iv) is to provide reasonable 

assurance that adequate funds will be 

available for the radiological 

decommissioning of power reactors. 

Based on schedules, costs, and funding 

contained in the PSDAR, DCE, SFMP, 

and exemption request, and the NRC 

staff’s independent review of this 

information, use of a portion of the 

TMI–1 DTF for site restoration activities 

at TMI–1 will not adversely impact the 

licensee’s ability to complete 

radiological decommissioning within 60 

years and terminate the TMI–1 license. 

Furthermore, an exemption from 10 

CFR 50.75(h)(1)(iv) to allow the licensee 

to make withdrawals from the TMI–1 

DTF for site restoration activities at 

TMI–1 without prior written 

notification to the NRC will not affect 

the sufficiency of funds in the DTF to 

accomplish radiological 

decommissioning because such 

withdrawals remain constrained by the 

provisions of 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(i)(B)– 

(C) and are reviewable under the annual 

reporting requirements of 10 CFR 

50.82(a)(8)(v)–(vii). 

There are no new accident precursors 

created by using the TMI–1 DTF in the 

proposed manner. Thus, the probability 

of postulated accidents is not increased. 

Also, the consequences of postulated 

accidents are not increased. No changes 

are being made in the types or amounts 

of effluents that may be released offsite. 

There is no significant increase in 

occupational or public radiation 

exposure. The requested exemption 

would not diminish the effectiveness of 

other regulations that ensure the 

available funding for decommissioning, 

including 10 CFR 50.82(a)(6), which 

prohibits licensees from performing any 

decommissioning activities that could 

foreclose unrestricted release of the site, 

result in significant environmental 

impacts not previously reviewed, or 

result in there no longer being 

reasonable assurance that adequate 

funds will be available for 

decommissioning. Therefore, the 

requested exemption will not present an 

undue risk to the public health and 

safety. 

C. The Exemption Is Consistent With the 

Common Defense and Security 

The requested exemption would 

allow the licensee to use funds from the 

TMI–1 DTF for site restoration activities 

at TMI–1. This change to enable the use 

of a portion of the funds from the DTF 

for site restoration activities has no 

relation to security issues. Therefore, 

the common defense and security is not 

impacted by the requested exemption. 

D. Special Circumstances 

Special circumstances, in accordance 

with 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii), are present 

whenever application of the regulation 

in the particular circumstances is not 

necessary to achieve the underlying 

purpose of the regulation. 

The underlying purpose of 10 CFR 

50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) and 10 CFR 

50.75(h)(1)(iv), which restrict 

withdrawals from DTFs to expenses for 

radiological decommissioning activities, 

is to provide reasonable assurance that 

adequate funds will be available for 

radiological decommissioning of power 

reactors and license termination. Strict 

application of these requirements would 

prohibit the withdrawal of funds from 

the TMI–1 DTF for activities other than 

radiological decommissioning activities 

at TMI–1, such as for site restoration 

activities, until final radiological 

decommissioning at TMI–1 has been 

completed. 

However, the NRC staff’s review of 

the exemption request, including 

consideration of the information in the 

PSDAR, DCE, SFMP, and the annual 

DTF certification reports and the staff’s 

independent analysis, found that 

reasonable assurance exists that 

adequate funds will be available in the 

TMI–1 DTF to complete 

decommissioning and terminate the 

TMI–1 license, with excess funding 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
36156 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 115 / Wednesday, June 15, 2022 / Notices 

available to pay for site restoration 

activities within the scope of the 

exemption request. 

The staff’s cash-flow analysis projects 

that the TMI–1 DTF will contain 

approximately $253.7 million at the end 

of license termination activities in 2081 

(using a 2 percent real rate of return as 

allowed by 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(ii)), 

considering its use for payment of spent 

fuel management throughout the 60-year 

decommissioning period (as approved 

by a previous exemption) and its use for 

the site restoration activities within the 

scope of the current exemption request. 

This analysis aligns with the cash-flow 

analysis provided by the licensee in its 

exemption request. 

As presented in Table 2 of the 

exemption request, the beginning DTF 

balance was the December 31, 2020, 

DTF value ($742,497k) less the 2020 site 

radiological decommissioning costs 

($14,663k) and the 2018, 2019, and 2020 

spent fuel management costs ($54,673k) 

that were not yet reimbursed as of 

December 31, 2020. The staff’s cashflow analysis estimates that the licensee 

projected costs for radiological 

decommissioning to be approximately 

$977.5 million, costs for spent fuel 

management to be approximately $160.1 

million, and cost for site restoration 

activities to be approximately $92.8 

million, all in 2020 dollars. This 

amounts to total estimated costs of 

approximately $1.23 billion for 

radiological decommissioning, spent 

fuel management, and site restoration 

activities with license termination 

occurring in 2081. In its analysis, the 

NRC staff assumed a 2 percent annual 

real rate of return on the DTF balance, 

less annual costs, resulting in a positive 

DTF balance of approximately $253.7 

million at the time of license 

termination. 

Therefore, the NRC staff finds that the 

licensee has provided reasonable 

assurance that adequate funds will be 

available for the radiological 

decommissioning of TMI–1, even with 

the disbursement of funds from the DTF 

for spent fuel management (previously 

approved) and site restoration activities 

(currently requested). Accordingly, the 

NRC staff concludes that application of 

the requirements of 10 CFR 

50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) and 10 CFR 

50.75(h)(1)(iv), that funds from the DTF 

only be used for radiological 

decommissioning activities and not for 

site restoration activities, is not 

necessary to achieve the underlying 

purpose of the rule. Thus, special 

circumstances are present supporting 

approval of the exemption request. 

In its submittal, the licensee also 

requested exemption from the 

requirement of 10 CFR 50.75(h)(1)(iv) 

concerning prior written notification to 

the NRC of withdrawals from DTFs for 

activities other than radiological 

decommissioning. The underlying 

purpose of notifying the NRC prior to 

such withdrawals of funds from DTFs is 

to provide an opportunity for NRC 

intervention, when deemed necessary, if 

the withdrawals are for expenses other 

than those authorized by 10 CFR 

50.75(h)(1)(iv) and 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8) 

that could result in there being 

insufficient funds in the DTFs to 

accomplish radiological 

decommissioning. 

By granting the exemption to 10 CFR 

50.75(h)(1)(iv) and 10 CFR 

50.82(a)(8)(i)(A), the NRC staff considers 

that withdrawals consistent with the 

licensee’s exemption request are 

authorized. As stated previously, the 

NRC staff determined that there are 

sufficient funds in the TMI–1 DTF to 

complete radiological decommissioning 

activities, as well as to conduct spent 

fuel management (previously approved) 

and site restoration activities (currently 

requested), consistent with the TMI–1 

PSDAR, DCE, SFMP and May 20, 2021, 

exemption request. Pursuant to the 

requirements in 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v) 

and (vii), licensees are required to 

monitor and annually report to the NRC 

the status of the DTF and the licensee’s 

funding for spent fuel management. 

These reports provide the NRC staff 

with awareness of, and the ability to 

take action on, any actual or potential 

funding deficiencies. Additionally, 10 

CFR 50.82(a)(8)(vi) requires that the 

annual financial assurance status report 

must include additional financial 

assurance to cover the estimated cost of 

completion if the sum of the balance of 

any remaining decommissioning funds, 

plus earnings on such funds calculated 

at not greater than a 2-percent real rate 

of return, together with the amount 

provided by other financial assurance 

methods being relied upon, does not 

cover the estimated cost to complete the 

decommissioning. The requested 

exemption would not allow the 

withdrawal of funds from the DTF for 

any other purpose that is not currently 

authorized in the regulations without 

prior notification to the NRC. Therefore, 

the granting of the exemption to 10 CFR 

50.75(h)(1)(iv) to allow the licensee to 

make withdrawals from the TMI–1 DTF 

to cover authorized expenses for site 

restoration activities at TMI–1 without 

prior written notification to the NRC 

will still meet the underlying purpose of 

the regulation. 

Special circumstances, in accordance 

with 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(iii), are present 

whenever compliance would result in 

undue hardship or other costs that are 

significantly in excess of those 

contemplated when the regulation was 

adopted, or that are significantly in 

excess of those incurred by others 

similarly situated. The licensee states 

that the DTF contains funds in excess of 

the estimated costs of radiological 

decommissioning and that these excess 

funds are needed for site restoration 

activities. Preventing access to those 

excess funds in DTFs because site 

restoration activities are not associated 

with radiological decommissioning 

would create an unnecessary financial 

burden without any corresponding 

safety benefit. The adequacy of the 

TMI–1 DTF to cover the cost of 

activities associated with site restoration 

activities, in addition to radiological 

decommissioning and spent fuel 

management (pursuant to a previously 

approved exemption), is supported by 

the NRC staff’s review as described 

herein and reflected in Attachment 1 of 

the exemption request. If the licensee 

cannot use the TMI–1 DTF for site 

restoration activities, it would need to 

obtain additional funding that would 

not be recoverable from the DTF, or it 

would have to modify its 

decommissioning approach and 

methods. The NRC staff concludes that 

either outcome would impose an 

unnecessary and undue burden 

significantly in excess of that 

contemplated when 10 CFR 

50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) and 10 CFR 

50.75(h)(1)(iv) were adopted. 

The underlying purposes of 10 CFR 

50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) and 10 CFR 

50.75(h)(1)(iv) would be achieved by 

allowing the licensee to use a portion of 

the TMI–1 DTF for site restoration 

activities at TMI–1 without prior NRC 

notification, and compliance with the 

regulations would result in an undue 

hardship or other costs that are 

significantly in excess of those 

contemplated when the regulations 

were adopted. Thus, the special 

circumstances in 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii) 

and 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(iii) exist and 

support the approval of the requested 

exemptions. 

E. Environmental Considerations 

In accordance with 10 CFR 51.31(a), 

the Commission has determined that the 

granting of the exemptions will not have 

a significant effect on the quality of the 

human environment (see Environmental 

Assessment and Finding of No 

Significant Impact published in the 

Federal Register on June 6, 2022 (87 FR 

34311)). 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 115 / Wednesday, June 15, 2022 / Notices 36157 

IV. Conclusions 

In consideration of the above, the 

NRC staff finds that reasonable 

assurance exists that adequate funds 

will be available in the TMI–1 DTF to 

complete radiological decommissioning 

of the site and to terminate the TMI–1 

license, with excess funding available to 

pay for spent fuel management 

(previously approved) and site 

restoration activities within the scope of 

the exemption request. There is no 

decrease in safety associated with the 

DTF being used to fund activities 

associated with site restoration. 

Accordingly, the Commission has 

determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR 10 

CFR 50.12(a), the exemptions are 

authorized by law, will not present an 

undue risk to the public health and 

safety, and are consistent with the 

common defense and security. Also, 

special circumstances are present. 

Therefore, the Commission hereby 

grants CEG the exemptions from the 

requirements of 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) 

and 10 CFR 50.75(h)(1)(iv) to allow CEG 

to use of a portion of the funds from the 

TMI–1 DTF for site restoration 

activities, without prior NRC 

notification. 

The exemptions are effective upon 

issuance. 

V. Availability of Documents 

The documents identified in the 

following table are available to 

interested persons through ADAMS. 

Document ADAMS 

accession No. 

Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1, Request for Exemption from 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) and 10 CFR 50.75(h)(1)(iv), 

dated 3/20/2021 ............................................................................................................................................................................... ML21140A311 

Notification of Completion of License Transfer and Request to Continue Processing Pending NRC Actions Previously Requested by Exelon Generation Company, LLC, dated 2/1/2022 ..................................................................................................... ML22032A333 

Three Mile Island, Unit 1, Certification of Permanent Cessation of Power Operations, dated 6/20/2017 ......................................... ML17171A151 

Certification of Permanent Removal of Fuel from the Reactor Vessel for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1, dated 9/26/ 

2019 ................................................................................................................................................................................................. ML19269E480 

Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1—Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report, dated 4/5/2019 ............................ ML19095A041 

Site-Specific Decommissioning Cost Estimate for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1, dated 4/5/2019 ................................. ML19095A010 

Three Mile Island, Unit 1, Submittal of Spent Fuel Management Plan, dated 4/5/2019 .................................................................... ML19095A009 

Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1—Exemptions from the Requirements of 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) and 10 CFR 

50.75(h)(1)(iv) (EPID L–2019–LLE–0009), dated 10/16/2019 ......................................................................................................... ML19259A175 

Site-Specific Decommissioning Cost Estimate for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1, dated 4/5/2019 ................................. ML19095A010 

Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Unit 1; and Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, 

Unit 1—Report on Status of Decommissioning Funding for Shutdown Reactors, dated 3/23/22 .................................................. ML22082A227 

Exelon Generation Co, LLC—Report on Status of Decommissioning Funding for Reactors and Independent Spent Fuel Storage 

Installations, dated 2/24/2021 .......................................................................................................................................................... ML21055A776 

Dated: June 9, 2022. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Ashley B. Roberts, 

Deputy Director, Division of 

Decommissioning, Uranium Recovery, and 

Waste Programs, Office of Nuclear Material 

Safety and Safeguards. 

[FR Doc. 2022–12863 Filed 6–14–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

POSTAL SERVICE 

Product Change—Priority Mail 

Negotiated Service Agreement 

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives 

notice of filing a request with the Postal 

Regulatory Commission to add a 

domestic shipping services contract to 

the list of Negotiated Service 

Agreements in the Mail Classification 

Schedule’s Competitive Products List. 

DATES: Date of required notice: June 15, 

2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sean Robinson, 202–268–8405. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

United States Postal Service® hereby 

gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 

3642 and 3632(b)(3), on June 7, 2022, it 

filed with the Postal Regulatory 

Commission a USPS Request to Add 

Priority Mail Contract 744 to 

Competitive Product List. Documents 

are available at www.prc.gov, Docket 

Nos. MC2022–64, CP2022–70. 

Sean Robinson, 

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law. 

[FR Doc. 2022–12913 Filed 6–14–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7710–12–P 

POSTAL SERVICE 

Product Change—Priority Mail 

Negotiated Service Agreement 

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives 

notice of filing a request with the Postal 

Regulatory Commission to add a 

domestic shipping services contract to 

the list of Negotiated Service 

Agreements in the Mail Classification 

Schedule’s Competitive Products List. 

DATES: Date of required notice: June 15, 

2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sean Robinson, 202–268–8405. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

United States Postal Service® hereby 

gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 

3642 and 3632(b)(3), on June 8, 2022, it 

filed with the Postal Regulatory 

Commission a USPS Request to Add 

Priority Mail Contract 745 to 

Competitive Product List. Documents 

are available at www.prc.gov, Docket 

Nos. MC2022–65, CP2022–71. 

Sean Robinson, 

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law. 

[FR Doc. 2022–12912 Filed 6–14–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7710–12–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–95018; File No. SR–FINRA– 

2021–024] 

Self-Regulatory Organizations; 

Financial Industry Regulatory 

Authority, Inc.; Order Approving a 

Proposed Rule Change To Amend 

FINRA Rule 2231 (Customer Account 

Statements), as Modified by 

Amendment No. 1 

Correction 

In notice document 2022–12169, 

appearing on pages 34728–34736, in the 

issue of Tuesday, June 7, 2022, make the 

following correction: 

On page 34728, in the first column, in 

the standard document heading, the 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1