35898 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 14, 2022 / Rules and Regulations 

700 feet above the surface at Carter 

Ranch Airport, Oakwood, TX, to 

support instrument flight rule 

operations at this airport. 

History 

The FAA published a notice of 

proposed rulemaking in the Federal 

Register (87 FR 21060; April 11, 2022) 

for Docket No. FAA–2022–0310 to 

amend the Class E airspace at Oakwood, 

TX. Interested parties were invited to 

participate in this rulemaking effort by 

submitting written comments on the 

proposal to the FAA. No comments 

were received. 

Class E airspace designations are 

published in paragraph 6005 of FAA 

Order JO 7400.11F, dated August 10, 

2021, and effective September 15, 2021, 

which is incorporated by reference in 14 

CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace 

designations listed in this document 

will be published subsequently in FAA 

Order JO 7400.11F. 

Availability and Summary of 

Documents for Incorporation by 

Reference 

This document amends FAA Order JO 

7400.11F, Airspace Designations and 

Reporting Points, dated August 10, 

2021, and effective September 15, 2021. 

FAA Order JO 7400.11F is publicly 

available as listed in the ADDRESSES

section of this document. FAA Order JO 

7400.11F lists Class A, B, C, D, and E 

airspace areas, air traffic service routes, 

and reporting points. 

The Rule 

This amendment to 14 CFR part 71 

amends the Class E airspace extending 

upward from 700 feet above the surface 

at Carter Ranch Airport, Oakwood, TX, 

by removing the Leona VORTAC and 

associated extension from the airspace 

legal description; removes the 

exclusionary language from the airspace 

legal description as it is not required; 

and removes the city associated with the 

airport to comply with changes to FAA 

Order JO 7400.2N, Procedures for 

Handling Airspace Matters. 

This action is the result of an airspace 

review conducted as part of the 

decommissioning of the Leona VOR, 

which provided navigation information 

for the instrument procedures at this 

airport, as part of the VOR MON 

Program. 

FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, is 

published yearly and effective on 

September 15. 

Regulatory Notices and Analyses 

The FAA has determined that this 

regulation only involves an established 

body of technical regulations for which 

frequent and routine amendments are 

necessary to keep them operationally 

current, is non-controversial and 

unlikely to result in adverse or negative 

comments. It, therefore: (1) is not a 

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under 

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a 

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT 

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) 

does not warrant preparation of a 

regulatory evaluation as the anticipated 

impact is so minimal. Since this is a 

routine matter that only affects air traffic 

procedures and air navigation, it is 

certified that this rule, when 

promulgated, does not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

Environmental Review 

The FAA has determined that this 

action qualifies for categorical exclusion 

under the National Environmental 

Policy Act in accordance with FAA 

Order 1050.1F, Environmental Impacts: 

Policies and Procedures, paragraph 5– 

6.5.a. This airspace action is not 

expected to cause any potentially 

significant environmental impacts, and 

no extraordinary circumstances exist 

that warrant preparation of an 

environmental assessment. 

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

Adoption of the Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 

40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 

1959–1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO 7400.11F, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated August 10, 2021, and 

effective September 15, 2021, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas 

Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More 

Above the Surface of the Earth. 

* * * * * 

ASW TX E5 Oakwood, TX [Amended] 

Carter Ranch Airport, TX 

(Lat. 31°34′01′′N, long. 95°46′00′′W) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 6.5-mile 

radius of Carter Ranch Airport. 

Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on June 8, 

2022. 

Martin A. Skinner, 

Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, 

ATO Central Service Center. 

[FR Doc. 2022–12695 Filed 6–13–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 

Copyright Royalty Board 

37 CFR Part 360 

[Docket No. 17–CRB–0012–RM] 

Procedural Regulations for the 

Copyright Royalty Board Regarding 

Electronic Filing of Claims; 

Corrections 

AGENCY: Copyright Royalty Board, 

Library of Congress. 

ACTION: Correcting amendments. 

SUMMARY: On July 8, 2019, the Copyright 

Royalty Judges revised their regulations 

to move several sections from one part 

to a new part. At the time, the Judges 

inadvertently failed to revise other 

regulations that include cross-references 

to the old part. They are now revising 

regulations regarding the filing of claims 

to reflect the change. 

DATES: Effective June 14, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Anita Brown, CRB Program Specialist, 

202–707–7658, crb@loc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 2019, 

the Copyright Royalty Judges moved 

provisions related to general 

administrative items from part 350 to a 

new part 303 (84 FR 32296, July 8, 

2019). The Judges inadvertently failed to 

make conforming revisions to part 360 

governing the filing of claims at that 

time. The Judges now amend three 

sections of part 360 to correct outdated 

cross-references. They are updating the 

cross-reference in § 360.3(b) from 

§ 350.7 to § 303.7 (regarding time) and 

the cross-references in §§ 360.4(c) and 

360.22(c) from § 350.5(g) to § 303.5(g) 

(regarding changes in name and 

address). See 82 FR 27016 (June 13, 

2017) (Final rule) and 82 FR 55323 

(Nov. 21, 2017) (Correcting 

amendment). 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 14, 2022 / Rules and Regulations 35899 

1 87 FR 3217. 

List of Subjects in 37 CFR Part 360 

Administrative practice and 

procedure, Cable royalties, Claims, 

Copyright, Electronic filing, Satellite 

royalties. 

Accordingly, the Copyright Royalty 

Judges correct 37 CFR part 360 by 

making the following correcting 

amendments: 

PART 360—FILING OF CLAIMS TO 

ROYALTY FEES COLLECTED UNDER 

COMPULSORY LICENSE 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 360 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 17 U.S.C. 801, 803, 805. 

Subpart A also issued under 17 U.S.C. 

111(d)(4) and 119(b)(4). 

Subpart B also issued under 17 U.S.C. 

1007(a)(1). 

Subpart C also issued under 17 U.S.C. 

111(d)(4), 119(b)(4) and 1007(a)(1). 

Subpart A—Cable and Satellite Claims 

§ 360.3 [Amended] 

■ 2. In § 360.3, amend paragraph (b) by 

removing ‘‘350.7’’ and adding in its 

place ‘‘303.7’’. 

§ 360.4 [Amended] 

■ 3. In § 360.4, amend paragraph (c) by 

removing ‘‘350.5(g)’’ and adding in its 

place ‘‘303.5(g)’’. 

Subpart B—Digital Audio Recording 

Devices and Media (DART) Royalty 

Claims 

§ 360.22 [Amended] 

■ 4. In § 360.22, amend paragraph (c) by 

removing ‘‘350.5(g)’’ and adding in its 

place ‘‘303.5(g)’’. 

Dated: June 8, 2022. 

Suzanne M. Barnett, 

Chief Copyright Royalty Judge. 

[FR Doc. 2022–12747 Filed 6–13–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1410–72–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

46 CFR Part 4 

[Docket No. USCG–2021–0348] 

Navigation and Navigable Waters, and 

Shipping; Technical, Organizational, 

and Conforming Amendments 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Technical amendment. 

SUMMARY: On January 21, 2022, the 

Coast Guard prematurely amended the 

definition of ‘‘major marine casualty’’ 

for title 46 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations as part of a technical 

amendment. The Coast Guard is 

reverting that definition back to how it 

appeared prior to issuance of the 

technical amendment. 

DATES: This final rule is effective June 

14, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: To view documents 

mentioned in this preamble as being 

available in the docket, go to https://

www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2021– 

0348 in the search box and click 

‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type 

column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related 

Material.’’ 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

information about this document call or 

email Courtney Mallon, Coast Guard; 

telephone 202–372–3758, email 

Courtney.Mallon@uscg.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents for Preamble 

I. Abbreviations 

II. Basis and Purpose, and Regulatory History 

III. Discussion of the Rule 

IV. Regulatory Analyses 

A. Regulatory Planning and Review 

B. Small Entities 

C. Assistance for Small Entities 

D. Collection of Information 

E. Federalism 

F. Unfunded Mandates 

G. Taking of Private Property 

H. Civil Justice Reform 

I. Protection of Children 

J. Indian Tribal Governments 

K. Energy Effects 

L. Technical Standards 

M. Environment 

I. Abbreviations 

CFR Code of Federal Regulations 

NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking 

NTSB National Transportation Safety Board 

§ Section 

U.S.C. United States Code 

II. Basis and Purpose, and Regulatory 

History 

On January 21, 2022, the Coast Guard 

published a technical amendment 1 that 

revised the definition of ‘‘major marine 

casualty’’ in title 46 of the Code of 

Federal Regulations (CFR), paragraph 

4.40–5(d)(3). That change altered the 

property damage threshold from 

$500,000 to $2,000,000. The stated basis 

for the change was to implement section 

211 of the Save Our Seas Act of 2018 

(Pub. L. 115–265, 132 Stat. 3742). 

However, the Coast Guard has 

determined that this matter needs 

further analysis. The correct legal 

authority for changing this regulation is 

title 49 of the United States Code 

(U.S.C.), section 1131. That statute 

requires a rule prescribed jointly by the 

National Transportation Safety Board 

(NTSB) and the Coast Guard. As a 

result, we need to revert to the previous 

value of $500,000 for the time being. 

The Coast Guard is issuing this 

technical amendment without prior 

notice and opportunity to comment 

pursuant to authority under section 4(a) 

of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 

U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision 

authorizes an agency to issue a rule 

without prior notice and opportunity to 

comment when the agency for good 

cause finds that those procedures are 

‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary 

to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C. 

553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that 

good cause exists for not publishing a 

notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 

with respect to this technical 

amendment because publishing an 

NPRM would be unnecessary. Under 49 

U.S.C. 1131, changes to the reporting 

value threshold for 46 CFR 4.40–5(d)(3) 

requires a rule prescribed jointly by the 

NTSB and the Coast Guard. The January 

21, 2022, technical amendment was 

only issued by the Coast Guard, so the 

value listed before the technical 

amendment should be restored, and can 

later be adjusted in a joint rulemaking. 

For those same reasons, under 5 U.S.C. 

553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that 

good cause exists for making this 

technical amendment effective less than 

30 days after publication in the Federal 

Register. 

III. Discussion of the Rule 

This action restores the property 

damage threshold of 46 CFR 4.40– 

5(d)(3), to $500,000. 

IV. Regulatory Analyses 

We developed this amendment after 

considering numerous statutes and 

Executive orders related to rulemaking. 

Below we summarize our analyses 

based on these statutes or Executive 

orders. 

A. Regulatory Planning and Review 

Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory 

Planning and Review) and 13563 

(Improving Regulation and Regulatory 

Review) direct agencies to assess the 

costs and benefits of available regulatory 

alternatives and, if regulation is 

necessary, to select regulatory 

approaches that maximize net benefits 

(including potential economic, 

environmental, public health and safety 

effects, distributive impacts, and 

equity). Executive Order 13563 

emphasizes the importance of 

quantifying both costs and benefits, of 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1