alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000902978
<NAME> THE EMERGING MARKETS INCOME FUND II INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                      355,227,003
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                     362,192,180
<RECEIVABLES>                               23,067,651
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                     518
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                           238,263
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             385,498,612
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                    30,569,875
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                    100,000,000
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                      869,204
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                        131,439,079
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                 23,434
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                   323,774,420
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                       23,433,683
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                       23,165,622
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                      420,512
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                   (77,341,544)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                     7,182,711
<NET-ASSETS>                               254,059,533
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                                    0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                           44,304,351
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                              10,975,640
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                     33,328,710
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                    10,223,710
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                   21,148,019
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                       64,700,440
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                   38,496,993
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                              0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                          0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                            268,061
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                      29,052,551
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                      7,101,419
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                 (89,077,879)
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                        2,980,267
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,553,442
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                             10,975,640
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                       246,588,977
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                             9.71
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                   1.36
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                           1.41
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                              0.00
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                         1.65
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                              0.00
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                              10.84
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                   4.45


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6947

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

AARON TYLER SOMERVILLE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District 

Judge. (1:08-cr-00442-JFM-1; 1:13-cv-00437-JFM)

Submitted: October 17, 2013 Decided: October 21, 2013

Before AGEE, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aaron Tyler Somerville, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher John 

Romano, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Aaron Tyler Somerville seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2013) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Somerville has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
# Official Journal L 184/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 184 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6425 May 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 184

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6425 May 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Decision (EU) 2021/826 of 17 May 2021 on relief from import duties and VAT exemption granted for goods imported by Belgium as response to the assistance requested by Greece in order to deal with the migration crisis
  (notified under document C(2021) 3274) | 1 |
| | | GUIDELINES |
| | * | Guideline (EU) 2021/827 of the European Central Bank of 29 April 2021 amending Guideline ECB/2013/24 on the statistical reporting requirements of the European Central Bank in the field of quarterly financial accounts (ECB/2021/20) | 4 |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | UN Regulation No 158 – Uniform provisions concerning the approval of devices for reversing motion and motor vehicles with regard to the driver’s awareness of vulnerable road users behind vehicles [2021/828] | 20 |
| | * | UN Regulation No 159 – uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to the Moving Off Information System for the Detection of Pedestrians and Cyclists [2021/829] | 62 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Decision (EU) 2021/826 of 17 May 2021 on relief from import duties and VAT exemption granted for goods imported by Belgium as response to the assistance requested by Greece in order to deal with the migration crisis
  (notified under document C(2021) 3274)

(notified under document C(2021) 3274)

1

GUIDELINES

*

Guideline (EU) 2021/827 of the European Central Bank of 29 April 2021 amending Guideline ECB/2013/24 on the statistical reporting requirements of the European Central Bank in the field of quarterly financial accounts (ECB/2021/20)

4

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

UN Regulation No 158 – Uniform provisions concerning the approval of devices for reversing motion and motor vehicles with regard to the driver’s awareness of vulnerable road users behind vehicles [2021/828]

20

*

UN Regulation No 159 – uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to the Moving Off Information System for the Detection of Pedestrians and Cyclists [2021/829]

62

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Raul RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6120

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
1 ... T h i s pr oce edi n g a r i s es ou t of Cau s e N o. 2005- CR
- 8161, s t y l ed St at e v. F l ore s , i n t he 22 6t h Judi ci al D i s t r i ct C o u rt, B e x a r C o u n ty, T e x a s , t h e H o n o ra b le S id L . H a rle p re sid ing
. i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No
. 04 -0 9- 00 33 7- CR IN RE Fr ed

F LOR ES Orig inal Mandamus Proce eding 1
PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Kar en Ang elini , J ustice

Phy lis J . Speedlin , J ustice Marialy n Ba rnar d, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: J uly 1, 2009 PETI TI ON F OR WR I T OF MANDAMUS DEN I ED AS MOOT On J une 8, 2009, relator Fred Flores filed a petition for wr it of mandamus, see king to c ompel the trial cour

t to rule on his second motion for DNA testing filed on Dec ember 22, 2008. Howeve r,
o n J u n e 1 6 , 2 0 0 9 , th e t ri al co u rt s i gn ed an o rd er d en y i n g re l at o r’ s s ec o n d m o t i o n fo r DN A t es t i n g. There fore , the petition for wr it of mandamus is now moot. Acc ording ly , we de ny

the petition for wr it of ma n d am u s and all other relief reque sted as
m o o t . PER C URI AM DO NO T PU B L I SH
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7178

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DENNIS CARL HARRIS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CR-92-113-N, CA-97-389-2) Submitted: May 18, 1999 Decided: May 27, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald Edward Schwartz, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant. LauraMarie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Dennis Carl Harris seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Harris , Nos. CR-92- 113-N; CA-97-389-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 13, 1998; July 15, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018322EN.01001801.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 12.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 322/18 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.8977 — Lone Star Funds/Imerys TC)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 322/08)

1.

On 30 August 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018322EN.01001801-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | LSF10 Impala Investments SARL (Luxembourg), controlled by Lone Star Fund X (United States) (together ‘Lone Star Funds’), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Imerys TC, société par actions simplifiée (‘Imerys’, France), controlled by Imerys SA (France). |

Lone Star Funds acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Imerys. The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of assets.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Lone Star Funds: as a private equity firm, investing in real estate, equity, credit and other financial assets around the world,

—   for Imerys: designing and providing roofing products including clay and terracotta tiles, photovoltaic solutions, thermal roofing and accessories, serving individuals, professionals, and construction companies, almost exclusively in France.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018322EN.01001801-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.8977 — Lone Star Funds/Imerys TC

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018322EN.01001801-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018322EN.01001801-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
EXHIBIT 32.1**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002****(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350,****CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)**     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) (the “Act”), the undersigned, Travis E. Baugh,President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of MicroMed Cardiovascular, Inc.(the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:     (1) the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and     (2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: May 15, 2006         By: /s/ Travis E. Baugh       Travis E. Baugh      President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief      Financial Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, an other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has beenprovided to Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
23
EXHIBIT 31.a

I, John P. Manning, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BCTC V Assignor Corp. (the "Assignor");
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Assignor as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The Assignor's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Assignor and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the Assignor, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the Assignor's disclosure controls and procedures  and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



1. The Assignor's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Assignor's auditors and the audit committee of the Assignor's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Assignor's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Assignor's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  August 14, 2006 | /s/ John P. Manning 
|---------------------- | --------------------
|                       | John P. Manning     
|                       | Director, President 
|                       | (Principal Executive
|                       | Officer), BCTC V    
|                       | Assignor Corp.
Exhibit 10.3





AMENDMENT TO SENIOR EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT





This Amendment (“Amendment”) to the Senior Executive Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) is made as of May 16, 2011 (the “Effective Date”), by and among VIASPACE Green Energy, Inc., a British Virgin Islands company (“Company”), and Stephen Muzi, a resident of the State of California, United States of America (“Executive”).  Capitalized terms shall have the meaning ascribed thereto in the Agreement.




RECITALS




The parties entered into the Agreement on May 14, 2010.





The parties desire to change the manner of payment in the second year of the Agreement.





AGREEMENT





The parties hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows:





1.4 Compensation and Benefits.




(a)           Base Compensation.  In consideration of the Services to be rendered to Company by Executive and Executive's covenants under this Agreement, Company agrees to pay Executive during the Employment Term a salary at the annual rate of no less than One Hundred Eighty Thousand Dollars ($180,000) (the “Base Compensation”), less statutory deductions and withholdings, payable in accordance with Company's regular payroll practices.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, for the first consecutive twenty-four (24) calendar month period from May 14, 2010, Executive’s Base Compensation shall be paid by VIASPACE Inc., in the form of VIASPACE common stock as approved by the VIASPACE Board on October 22, 2008.




Except to the extent the Agreement is modified by this Amendment, the remaining terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unmodified and be in full force and effect.









[signature page follows]












IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first set forth above.





VIASPACE Green Energy Inc.

Signature: /s/ Sung Hsien ChangPrinted Name: Sung Hsien ChangTitle: President











EXECUTIVE

Signature: /s/ Stephen MuziPrinted Name: Stephen Muzi








VIASPACE Inc. hereby agrees to pay Executive the compensation described in the second sentence of Section 1.4(a) of this Agreement by issuing to Executive shares of VIASPACE common shares having a value required to satisfy such obligation; and (b) be subject to the terms and conditions of Section 3 of this Agreement as a party hereto, including, without limitation, Sections 3.12 and 3.13.





AGREED AND ACKNOWLEDGED:



VIASPACE Inc.





Signature: /s/ Carl KukkonenPrinted Name: Carl KukkonenTitle: President & CEO
Darren Paul ODELL, Petitioner v. MINNESOTA

No. 19-6270

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Minnesota denied.
Steven NYGREN, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6557

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Herve WILMORE, Jr., Petitioner v. UNITED STATES;

No. 18-9829

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.