alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

LORENZO W. POWELL, §

§

Petitioner, §

§

versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-435

§

STATE OF TEXAS, §

§

Respondent. §

MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Petitioner Lorenzo W. Powell, a prisoner confined at the Estelle Unit of the Texas

Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this

Petition for Writ of Mandamus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651.

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States

Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders

of this court. On January 3, 2024, the magistrate judge recommended denying the petition. To

date, the parties have not filed objections to the report.

The court received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available

evidence. After careful review, the court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of

the United States Magistrate Judge are correct. 

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are

correct, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (#3) is

Case 1:23-cv-00435-MAC-CLS Document 5 Filed 02/12/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 21
ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate

judge’s recommendation. 

2

Case 1:23-cv-00435-MAC-CLS Document 5 Filed 02/12/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 22
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q REPORTOFREDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC.PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(CHAPTER 63, TITLE 18 U.S.C. SS.SS. 1350(a) AND (b))**

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350(a) and(b)), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2006 of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in suchReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

**Date:  July 27, 2006**

| /s/  STEVEN J. JANUSEK                     |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| Steven J. Janusek, Chief Financial Officer |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63,Title 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350(a) and (b)), is not a part of the Form 10-Qto which it refers and is, to the extent permitted by law, provided by theabove signatory to the extent of his knowledge.

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by ReddyIce Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

----
Daniel RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES;

Julio Rivera-Lopez, Petitioner, v. United States;

Kristian Torres, Petitioner, v. United States.

No. 18-9266

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit for further consideration in light of *United States* v. *Davis* , 588 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 2319, 204 L.Ed.2d 757 (2019).
Nicole Rena MCCREA, Petitioner v. Mark S. DEVAN, et al.

No. 19-6002

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland denied.
Travis Lavoy JENKINS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5759

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

*407Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1126 

To facilitate the completion of an appropriate national memorial to Dwight 

D. Eisenhower. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2013 

Mr. BISHOP of Utah introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To facilitate the completion of an appropriate national 

memorial to Dwight D. Eisenhower. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Dwight D. Eisenhower 

5 Memorial Completion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER MEMORIAL. 

7 (a) AMENDMENTS.—Section 8162 of Public Law 

8 106–79 (16 U.S.C. 431 note) is amended as follows: 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1126 IH

1 (1) By redesignating subsections (f), (g), (h), 

2 (i), (j), (k), (l), and (m) as subsections (g), (h), (i), 

3 (j), (k), (l), (m), and (o), respectively. 

4 (2) By inserting after subsection (e) the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(f) TERMS OF MEMBERS.—The appointment of a 

7 member of the Commission shall be for a term of 4 

8 years.’’. 

9 (3) In subsection (k), (as so redesignated by 

10 paragraph (2))— 

11 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘appro12 priated or’’; 

13 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘; and’’ 

14 and inserting a semicolon; 

15 (C) in paragraph (3), by striking the pe16 riod and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

17 (D) by adding after paragraph (3) the fol18 lowing: 

19 ‘‘(4) ensure that a design is selected for the me20 morial as an alternative to any designs submitted or 

21 selected before the date of the enactment of this 

22 paragraph.’’. 

23 (4) By inserting after subsection (m), (as so re24 designated by paragraph (2)), the following: 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1126 IH

1 ‘‘(n) EXPIRATION OF LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY.— 

2 Notwithstanding section 8903(e) of title 40, United States 

3 Code, the legislative authority for the memorial shall ex4 pire 3 years after the date of the enactment of this sub5 section.’’. 

6 (5) By amending subsection (o), (as so redesig7 nated by paragraph (2)), to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(o) FUNDING.—No Federal funds may be used to 

9 carry out this section.’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (f) of section 

11 8162 of Public Law 106–79 (16 U.S.C. 431 note), as 

12 added by subsection (a) of this Act shall take effect as 

13 if enacted on the date of the enactment of Public Law 

14 106–79. 

15 (c) COMMEMORATIVE WORKS ACT REQUIRE16 MENTS.—The text under the heading CAPITAL CONSTRUC17 TION in title III of division E of the Consolidated Appro18 priations Act, 2012 (40 U.S.C. 8903 note) is amended by 

19 striking ‘‘expended: Provided,’’ and all that follows 

20 through the final period and inserting ‘‘expended.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/13/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      419,669
COMMITMENTS
 111,532  194,218   84,631  195,070  111,127  391,233  389,976   28,436   29,693

CHANGES FROM 05/06/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     27,821)
   7,280   26,500    1,138   24,794    6,013   33,212   33,651   -5,391   -5,830

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    26.6     46.3     20.2     46.5     26.5     93.2     92.9      6.8      7.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      195)
      58       80       81       41       38      147      161
```

----

Updated May 16, 2014
John T. BEYERS, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5678

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q REPORT  OF  REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC.  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  (CHAPTER 63, TITLE 18 U.S.C.
SS.SS. 1350(a) AND (b))

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350(a) and (b)), the
undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                                                     |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: July 30, 2009                                                  |  | 
|/s/ GILBERT M. CASSAGNE Gilbert M. Cassagne,
Chief Executive Officer |  | 

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350(a) and (b)), is not
a part of the Form 10-Q to which it refers and is, to the extent permitted by law, provided by the above signatory to the extent of his knowledge.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6140

SENTELLUS MCDONALD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SGT. NICHOLSON,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, 

Chief District Judge. (5:13-ct-03061-D)

Submitted: March 27, 2014 Decided: April 1, 2014

Before MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sentellus McDonald, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Sentellus McDonald seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint 

as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012) and, 

alternatively, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. 

We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the 

notice of appeal was not timely filed. 

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of 

the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends 

the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely

filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket 

on September 19, 2013. The notice of appeal was filed, at the 

earliest, on January 21, 2014.* Because McDonald failed to file 

a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening 

of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with 

 * Although an inmate’s notice of appeal ordinarily is deemed 

filed on the date he delivered it to prison authorities for 

mailing to the court, Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988), 

McDonald’s notice of appeal does not indicate the date on which 

this act occurred. We conclude, however, that the notice of 

appeal can be deemed filed no earlier than January 21, the date 

McDonald signed the document.
3

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
GEOPHYSICAL SERVICE, INC., Petitioner, v. TGS-NOPEC GEOPHYSICAL CO.

No. 19-873.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 26, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Clive Barwin, President, CEO and Secretary of Melt Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Melt Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 12, 2004

/s/ Clive BarwinClive Barwin, President, CEO, Secretary and Director
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
STRAIGHT PATH IP GROUP, LLC, Petitioner v. APPLE INC., et al.

No. 19-253

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the filing of Brightpoint, Inc.'s (the "Company") Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2004 (the "Report"), I,
Anthony W. Boor, acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                          /s/ ANTHONY W. BOOR
                                          -----------------------------------
                                          Anthony W. Boor
                                          acting Chief Financial Officer

Date: August 29, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 7, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 34671]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12196]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

U.S. INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION


Notice of Cancellation of public hearing

AGENCY: U.S. International Development Finance Corporation.

ACTION: Cancellation of public hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The June 8, 2022, Public Hearing of the DFC Board of Directors 
has been cancelled and will be rescheduled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Catherine F.I. Andrade, DFC Corporate 
Secretary, (202) 336-8768, or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0f6c6e616b7d6e6b6a4f6b696c21686079"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4023212e2432212425002426236e272f36">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DFC published notice of its June 8, 2022 
Public Hearing of the Board of Directors in the Federal Register volume 
87, page 26741 on May 5, 2022. This hearing is cancelled due to 
scheduling conflicts. The public will be notified when the public 
hearing is rescheduled.
    Authority: 22 U.S.C. 9613(c).

Catherine F.I. Andrade,
DFC Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-12196 Filed 6-6-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3210-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 09/16/14          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      413,477
COMMITMENTS
 125,563  173,301   98,096  168,592  109,582  392,251  380,979   21,226   32,498

CHANGES FROM 09/09/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -11,833)
 -19,165    1,323   -7,098   17,014   -4,668   -9,249  -10,443   -2,584   -1,390

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    30.4     41.9     23.7     40.8     26.5     94.9     92.1      5.1      7.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      204)
      59       83       85       39       42      151      171
```

----

Updated September 19, 2014
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Corey Henry, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be
filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

2.             Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.            Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report
under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5.             All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and
15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association.



| | By:    | /s/ Corey Henry                                                                          | 
| | ------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| | Name:  | Corey Henry                                                                             
| | Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor
| |        | (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)                           
| | Date:  | March 30, 2020
Manetirony CLERVRAIN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 19-7842.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.