alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018060EN.01001101.xml

| 16.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/11

---

Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 60/12)

| Member State | Italy |
| --- | --- |
| Routes concerned | Elba Marina di Campo — Pisa and vice versa;
  Elba Marina di Campo — Florence and vice versa;
  Elba Marina di Campo — Milan Linate and vice versa. |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 1 June 2018 |
| Address from which the text and any information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligations can be obtained | For further information:





  Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport |
| Department of Transport, Navigation, General Affairs and Human Resources |
| Directorate-General for Airports and Air Transport |
| Via Giuseppe Caraci 36 |
| 00157 Rome |
| ITALIA |
| Tel. +39 0641583690 |

Member State

Italy

Routes concerned

Elba Marina di Campo — Pisa and vice versa;

Elba Marina di Campo — Florence and vice versa;

Elba Marina di Campo — Milan Linate and vice versa.

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

1 June 2018

Address from which the text and any information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligations can be obtained

For further information:

Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport

Department of Transport, Navigation, General Affairs and Human Resources

Directorate-General for Airports and Air Transport

Via Giuseppe Caraci 36

00157 Rome

ITALIA

Tel. +39 0641583690

| National Civil Aviation Authority (ENAC) |
| --- |
| Air Transport Development and Licensing Department (Direzione Sviluppo Trasporto Aereo e Licenze), |
| Viale Castro Pretorio 118 |
| 00185 Rome |
| ITALIA |
| Tel. +39 0644596515 |
| Internet |
| http://www.mit.gov.it |
| http://www.enac.gov.it |
| Email | : | dg.ta@pec.mit.gov.it
  osp@enac.gov.it |

National Civil Aviation Authority (ENAC)

Air Transport Development and Licensing Department (Direzione Sviluppo Trasporto Aereo e Licenze),

Viale Castro Pretorio 118

00185 Rome

ITALIA

Tel. +39 0644596515

Internet

http://www.mit.gov.it

http://www.enac.gov.it

Email

:

dg.ta@pec.mit.gov.it

osp@enac.gov.it

---
Brian HOSKINS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES

No. 18-8636

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1269 

To prohibit the use of lethal military force against citizens of the United 

States located within the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 19, 2013 

Mr. RADEL (for himself, Mr. AMASH, and Mr. MASSIE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and 

in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary and Select Intelligence 

(Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of lethal military force against citizens 

of the United States located within the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Life, Liberty, and Jus5 tice for All Americans Act’’. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1269 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF LETHAL MILITARY FORCE 

2 AGAINST CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES 

3 WITHIN THE UNITED STATES. 

4 (a) PROHIBITION.—The President may not use lethal 

5 military force against a citizen of the United States who 

6 is located in the United States. 

7 (b) EXCEPTION.—The prohibition under subsection 

8 (a) shall not apply to the President using lethal military 

9 force against an individual if the President determines 

10 that— 

11 (1) the individual poses an imminent threat of 

12 death or serious bodily injury to another individual; 

13 and 

14 (2) using such force will prevent or minimize 

15 such deaths or serious bodily injuries. 

16 (c) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall be 

17 construed to suggest that the Constitution would other18 wise allow the killing of a citizen of the United States 

19 without due process of law. 

20 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

21 (1) The term ‘‘lethal military force’’ means a 

22 targeted killing or other lethal action by the Federal 

23 Government that is typically used against an enemy 

24 of the United States, including through the use of 

25 an unmanned aircraft or other aircraft, regardless of 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1269 IH

1 the department or agency carrying out the targeted 

2 killing or other action. 

3 (2) The term ‘‘serious bodily injury’’ has the 

4 meaning given that term in section 1365(h)(3) of 

5 title 18, United States Code. 

6 (3) The term ‘‘United States’’, as used in a ter7 ritorial sense, has the meaning given that term in 

8 section 5 of title 18, United States Code. 

9 (4) The term ‘‘unmanned aircraft’’ has the 

10 meaning given that term in section 331(8) of the 

11 FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (49 

12 U.S.C. 40101 note). 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000919557
<NAME> Smith Barney Large Capitalization Growth Portfolio
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER>013
   <NAME>Travelers Series Fund Inc.

<S>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>             Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 Oct-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                      Oct-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>             280,381,313
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>            323,966,957
<RECEIVABLES>                         209,163
<ASSETS-OTHER>                            189
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    324,176,309
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                    0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>             468,035
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                   468,035
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                             0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>          283,115,366
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>              20,176,547
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>              11,577,964
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                   0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                      0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>            (2,992,736)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                    0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>           43,585,644
<NET-ASSETS>                      323,708,274
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                   1,947,514
<INTEREST-INCOME>                     232,176
<OTHER-INCOME>                              0
<EXPENSES-NET>                      2,021,096
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>               158,594
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>           (2,716,492)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>          18,982,786
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>              16,424,888
<EQUALIZATION>                              0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                   0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                    0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                       0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>             8,813,060
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>           263,869
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                    49,392
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>            155,427,963
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                39,724
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>              41,078
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                     0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                  0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>               1,969,101
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                     2,021,096
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>              262,052,678
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                  14.530
<PER-SHARE-NII>                         0.010
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                 1.550
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                    0.000
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>               0.050
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                    0.000
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                    16.040
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                          0.77



</TABLE>
Charles V. SCHNEIDER, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

No. 19-323

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Physicians Formula Holdings, Inc.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Joseph J.
Jaeger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and




(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350
and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.




Date:
August 11, 2008




By:
            /s/
      Joseph J. JaegerName:
            Joseph
      J. JaegerTitle:
            Chief
      Financial Officer







A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Physicians Formula
Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Physicians Formula
Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed July 9 , 2015

. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 15

- 00747

- CV

SHIVER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY , Appellant

V.

TUCKER ALBIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 14

- 05524

- D



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Brown and Stoddart Opinion by Justice Brown

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss appeal, stating the trial court has granted its

motion for new trial. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

42.1 (a)(1).

150747F.P05 /Ada Brown/
ADA BROWN JUSTICE– 2

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

SHIVER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Appellant

No. 05

- 15

- 00747

- CV V.

TUCKER ALBIN & ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4, Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 14

- 05524

- D. Opinion delivered by Justice Brown. Chief Justice Wright and Justice Stoddart participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER appellee Tucker Albin & Associates, Inc., recover its costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant Shiver Construction Company.

Judgment entered this 9th day of July, 2015.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-11349 Conference Calendar

BILLY RAY RISLEY, also known as Gordon Peter Amyotte, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus DAVID WILLIAMS, Tarrant County Sheriff; DAVID EDGEWORTH, Dr., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:95-CV-68-Y

- - - - - - - - - - August 14, 1997 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Billy Ray Risley (also known as Gordon Peter Amyotte), Texas prisoner # 715659, moves this court for the appointment of counsel on appeal and for discovery. As Risley has shown the capacity to prosecute this appeal, appointed counsel is DENIED. Branch v. Cole , 686 F.2d 264, 266 (5th Cir. 1982). Risley's motion for belated discovery is DENIED.No. 96-11349 -2- We dispense with further briefing because we have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, which includes detailed findings of fact, and determined that Risley's sole appellate contention--that the district court erred in granting summary judgment against him--is legally meritless. See Clark v. Williams , 693 F.2d 381, 382 (5th Cir. 1982) (we may dispose of an appeal on the merits on a motion for IFP). Therefore, Risley's appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. Risley is cautioned that any future frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. Risley is cautioned further to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous.
APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTIONS DENIED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1117 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1117

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to apply the ban on 
    contributions and expenditures by foreign nationals to domestic 
  corporations in which foreign principals have an ownership interest.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 13, 2013

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to apply the ban on 
    contributions and expenditures by foreign nationals to domestic 
  corporations in which foreign principals have an ownership interest.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; FINDINGS.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``America is for 
Americans Act''.
    (b) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
            (1) The Government has a compelling interest in preventing 
        foreign individuals and associations from influencing our 
        Nation's political process. Such entities neither enjoy nor 
        deserve any legal or constitutional right to such influence.
            (2) The presence of foreign individuals or associations 
        within domestic associations, to any degree, creates an 
        unacceptable risk of foreign influence over our Nation's 
        political process.
            (3) The law does not allow foreign individuals and 
        associations to vote in our elections; by the same token, the 
        law should not allow them to exercise any influence over our 
        Nation's political process, directly or indirectly, and neither 
        personally nor in alliance or combination with others.

SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF BAN ON CONTRIBUTIONS AND EXPENDITURES BY FOREIGN 
              NATIONALS TO DOMESTIC CORPORATIONS WITH FOREIGN 
              OWNERSHIP.

    Section 319(b) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 
U.S.C. 441e(b)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' at the end of paragraph (1);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (2) and 
        inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) a corporation (other than a foreign principal, as so 
        defined) in which one or more foreign principals directly or 
        indirectly has an ownership interest.''.
                                 <all>
```
IN RE Larry CHARLES, Petitioner;

No. 19-5295

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
Denzel PITTMAN, Petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 18-9451

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 07, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
Gale ZAMORE, Petitioner, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, Individually and as Trustee for JP Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Trust 2007-CH5 Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates Series 2007-CH5, et al.

No. 19-125

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-1 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, (the “Report”), the
undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify and represent that:

| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of January 24,
2018, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-1 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the “Agreement”) during the period that is the subject of the Report
has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement
in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.
| | ---------------------------
| |                            
| | By:                        
| | Name:                      
| | Title:                     
| | Date:                      
| |                            
| | By:                        
| | Name:                      
| | Title:                     
| | Date:
Order entered September 8, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00739-CV

NUSRET DALLAS LLC, Appellant

V.

STEVE REGAN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-00902

ORDER

Before the Court is court reporter Antionette Reagor’s September 7, 2021 

request for a twenty-day extension of time to file the reporter’s record. We 

GRANT the request and ORDER the record be filed no later than September 27, 

2021. 

/s/ KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE
Zelma RIVAS, Petitioner v. NEW YORK STATE LOTTERY

No. 18-1473

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
----

(2004/C 84 E/0555)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-1886/03

by Emmanouil Bakopoulos (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(27 May 2003)

Subject:   Iraqi cultural heritage

According to press reports, the Baghdad National Museum and the Mosul Museum have been primary targets for looting. To date, over 170 000 ancient exhibits have been stolen.

What steps will the Commission take to safeguard Iraq's cultural heritage and to locate the stolen exhibits?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(20 June 2003)

The Commission is deeply concerned by the looting and the destruction of a large number of archaeological treasures in the National Archaeological Museum of Baghdad. The Commission supports the views expressed by Unesco in the call issued on 17 April 2003, which deplored the extensive damages to the cultural heritage of Iraq, and recommended measures to stop the traffic of cultural objects exported illicitly.

The Commission is confident that all measures will be taken by the coalition forces, as present the responsible authority in Iraq, so that further destruction is avoided. In this respect, the Commission is preparing a draft regulation to implement the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1483, which repeals the sanctions imposed on Iraq trade. The Commission is considering the possibility of introducing a ban on the import of cultural objects from Iraq, according to the relevant article of Resolution 1483.

----
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 16-3912

___________

VICTORIA VOOYS, JOSEPH GERACE

d/b/a CANE BAY BEACH BAR

v.

MARIA BENTLEY; CB3, INC.; WARREN MOSLER;

CHRIS HANLEY; CHRISMOS CANE BAY, LLC

Warren Mosler; Chris Hanley; Chrismos Cane Bay, LLC,

Petitioners

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO

THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS

(V.I. S. Ct. Civ. No. 2015-0046)

(V.I. Super. Ct. Civ. No. 2005-00368)

___________

Argued December 12, 2017 before Merits Panel

Argued En Banc February 21, 2018

Opinion Filed August 21, 2018

___________

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

It appears that an orphan footnote designation was included in the majority opinion at 

page 41. At the direction of the Court, it is hereby ORDERED that the opinion is 

amended to delete the inclusion of footnote 134 in the body of the opinion.

A corrected opinion will be entered on the docket. As this amendment does not change 

the substance of the opinion, the original filing date of the opinion and judgment will not 

be changed.

For the Court,

s/ Patricia S. Dodszuweit

Clerk

Date: August 22, 2018

NMR/cc: All Counsel of Record
Independent Auditors Consent



To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
Smith Barney Principal Return Fund:

We consent to the use of our report, as listed below, with respect to the 
Funds Smith Barney Principal Return Fund incorporated herein by reference and to
 
the references to our Firm under the heading Financial Highlights" in the 
Prospectus and Counsel and Auditors" in the Statement of Additional 
Information.


Fund							Date of Independent Auditors Report

Security and Growth Fund			January 13, 1997

Zeros Plus Emerging Growth Series 2000	January 13, 1997

Zeros Plus Emerging Growth Series 1998	January 13, 1997


							

							KPMG Peat Marwick LLP



New York, New York
March 26, 1997