alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1 D 2 0 2 3

- 2397

_____________________________

G EORGE M C N ALLY
,

Appellant,

v.

D OVE I NVESTMENT C ORPORATION
,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the C ounty Court for Okaloosa County

. Jonathan V. Schlechter , Judge

.

August 28, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.

Appellant challenges a final money judgment awarding damages on an outstanding judgment. After filing this appeal, Appellant notified the Court that pursuant to an Order of Discharge from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Florida, the debt on the judgment appealed, as well as the underlying judgment, had been discharged.

Appellee concedes that it is prohibited by the bankruptcy discharge from taking further action in seeking collection of the judgment or continuing litigation to that effect. While Appellee had recorded the judgment, making it a lien on real property under section 55.10(1), Florida Statutes, there is no real property that2 remains subject to the lien following the bankruptcy discharge. Appellee agrees that no further practical relief can be attained from this Court or the lower tribunal.

We dismiss the appeal as moot.

D ISMISSED

.

L EWIS
, B.L. T HOMAS
, and W INOKUR , JJ., concur.

_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331

.

_____________________________

George McNally

, pro se, Appellant.

Hugh B. Shafritz

, Delray Beach, for Appellee.
# Official Journal L 269/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 269 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5710 September 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 269

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5710 September 2014

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 956/2014 of 9 September 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 956/2014 of 9 September 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Martel VALENCIA-CORTEZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5334

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Reginald Willis and Allied Aviation Fueling Company of 

Houston, Inc.

Appellate case number: 01-21-00208-CV

Trial court case number: 2019-81830

Trial court: 270th District Court of Harris County

Relators, Reginald Willis and Allied Aviation Fueling Company of Houston, Inc., have 

filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for emergency relief asking that the Court issue 

an order staying the trial, set for May 17, 2021, and all other proceedings, including a trial docket 

call set for Monday, May 3, at 10:00 a.m. Today, relators filed a supplemental motion for 

emergency relief asking to stay the trial setting and an emergency hearing set this afternoon at 3:45 

p.m. 

The Court declines to stay the hearing set for this afternoon at 3:45 p.m. and thus, the 

supplemental motion for emergency relief is denied. Relators’ original motion for emergency 

relief remains pending at this time. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____Justice Richard Hightower_______________

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Landau, and Hightower.

Date: __May 3, 2021____________
Sean M. DONAHUE, Petitioner v. PENNSYLVANIA

No. 19-6605

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Harrisburg Office denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 120 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 120

Approving the location of a memorial to commemorate the more than 5,000 
   slaves and free Black persons who fought for independence in the 
                          American Revolution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 23, 2014

 Mr. Butterfield introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Approving the location of a memorial to commemorate the more than 5,000 
   slaves and free Black persons who fought for independence in the 
                          American Revolution.

Whereas section 8908(b)(1) of title 40, United States Code, provides that the 
        location of a commemorative work in Area I, as depicted on the map 
        entitled ``Commemorative Areas Washington, DC and Environs'', numbered 
        869/86501 B, and dated June 24, 2003, shall be deemed to be authorized 
        only if a recommendation for that location is approved by law not later 
        than 150 calendar days after Congress is notified of the recommendation;
Whereas section 2860 of Public Law 112-239 (40 U.S.C. 8903 note) authorized the 
        National Mall Liberty Fund D.C. to establish a memorial on Federal land 
        in Area I or Area II, as depicted on such map, to honor the more than 
        5,000 slaves and free Black persons who fought for American independence 
        in the Revolutionary War; and
Whereas the Administrator of General Services has notified Congress of the 
        Administrator's determination that such memorial should be located in 
        Area I: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the location of a 
commemorative work to honor the more than 5,000 slaves and free Black 
persons who fought in the American Revolution, authorized by section 
2860 of division B of Public Law 112-239 (40 U.S.C. 8903 note), within 
Area I as described on the map entitled ``Commemorative Areas 
Washington, DC and Environs'', numbered 869/86501 B and dated June 24, 
2003, is approved.
                                 <all>
```
Jerry SIMMONS, Petitioner v. Darryl VANNOY, Warden

No. 19-6096

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Motion s Granted; Order filed April 15, 2014.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00889

- CR

____________ NOE GERARDO MORIN , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 337th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1306502



### ORDER

A jury convicted appellant of murder and assessed punishment at life in prison. Appellant’s court

- appointed counsel , Ellis McCullough, filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholl y frivolous and without mer it. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967 ). Counsel also filed a motion to withdraw from representing appellant.
On April 8, 2014, the trial court conducted a hearing and determined that counsel had not complied with the dictates of Anders v. Cali fornia. The court2

appointed substitute counsel, Angela Cameron of the Harris County Public Defender’s Office, to represent appellant in this appeal. Accordingly, we issue the following order:

We GRANT Ellis McCullough’s motion to withdraw and substitute Angela Cameron as appellant’s appointed counsel. We STRIKE the Anders brief filed in
this court o n March 10, 2014.
On April 9, 2014, appellant’s newly appointed counsel, Angela Cameron, filed a motion asking that we reset the briefing schedule. We GRANT t he motion.
The new appellant’s brief shall be due on or before May 15, 2014, subject to any extension of time that may be granted.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Donovan and Brown.
TEXAS, Plaintiff v. NEW MEXICO

No. 65, Original

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 21, 2019

Conditional motion of Texas for review of Special Master's 2019 final determination granted.
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 74 

Providing for a correction in the enrollment of H.R. 3547. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 13, 2014 

Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky submitted the following concurrent resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the 

Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for a correction in the enrollment of H.R. 3547. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 3547, 

3 the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall amend the 

4 long title so as to read: ‘‘Making consolidated appropria5 tions for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2014, and 

6 for other purposes.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 12.2



Certification by the Principal Financial
Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)
 and 15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002



I, Yao Shi, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of China SXT Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



| | Date:  | August 19, 2019                                      
| | ------ | -----------------------------------------------------
| |        |                                                      
| |        | /s/ Shi Yao                                          
| | Name:  | Shi Yao                                              
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 103 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 103

To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide authority to increase 
  the debt limit when an Act of Congress provides budget authority or 
               reduces revenues, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2013

  Mr. Fattah introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide authority to increase 
  the debt limit when an Act of Congress provides budget authority or 
               reduces revenues, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ending Fiscal Cliffs Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds that--
            (1) Congress has been granted exclusive authority for the 
        collecting and appropriating of revenue in Article I of the 
        Constitution.
            (2) Any increase in the public debt limit is necessary in 
        response to obligations and reduced revenue authorized by 
        Congress.
            (3) Stability and predictability in the full faith and 
        credit of the United States are critical to economic security.
            (4) World markets are sensitive to the fiscal affairs of 
        the United States given its role as a global leader and its 
        status as the wealthiest nation.

SEC. 3. CHANGE IN PUBLIC DEBT LIMIT WHEN ACT OF CONGRESS PROVIDES 
              BUDGET AUTHORITY OR REDUCES REVENUES.

    Subsection (b) of section 3101 of title 31, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``The face amount'' and inserting ``(1) The 
        face amount'';
            (2) by inserting ``(increased or decreased, as necessary, 
        by the applicable amount)'' after ``$14,294,000,000,000''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(2)(A) For purposes of paragraph (1), the Secretary of the 
Treasury shall determine the applicable amount after the enactment of 
any Act of Congress that provides budget authority (as defined in 
section 3(2) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 622(2))) 
or reduces revenues and shall publish such amount in the Federal 
Register.
    ``(B) For purposes of subparagraph (B), the term `applicable 
amount' means the amount determined by the Secretary of the Treasury to 
be required to meet existing commitments.''.
                                 <all>
```
Mario Laron WAITERS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9419

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cohen & Company Inc. (the Company) for the three months ended March 31,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel G. Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Signed:

/s/ Daniel G. CohenName:

Daniel G. CohenTitle:

Chief Executive Officer andChief Investment Officer


Date: May 7,
2010
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS REQUIRED BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Steinway Musical Instruments, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dennis M. Hanson, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that to the best of my knowledge:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/   Dennis M. Hanson                |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   |                                  |
|   | Senior   Executive Vice President and |
|   | Chief   Financial Officer             |
|   | (Principal   Financial Officer)       |

 

 

May 10, 2011

 

----
#### Helena Palm et al., Plaintiffs, *v.*Terry W. Jones et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Montgomery County,

June 23, 1973.

*Mario M. Albanese*for plaintiffs. *William J. Stewart*for defendants.

Arthur C. Aulisi, J.

This is an action to recover for personal injuries and property damage allegedly sustained by the plaintiffs as a result of an automobile accident which took place on October 14,1969. The defendants move to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the action is barred by the Statute of Limitations.

*581An examination of the motion papers discloses that on Friday, October 11,1972, by letter bearing that date, plaintiffs’ attorney mailed the summons to the Montgomery County Sheriff for service on the defendants by depositing same in a post-office box maintained by the United States Government in the City of Gloversville, New York; that the civil department of said Sheriff’s office located in Fonda, New York, is closed on Saturday and Sunday of each week; that the records of the Sheriff’s office disclose that plaintiffs’ attorney’s letter was received on October 16,1972, and that the summons was personally served on the defendants on October 18,1972 in Montgomery County where the defendants reside.

It is not necessary to consider the generally poor mail service prevailing during 1972 and particularly in the fall of that year. In my view, the summons was delivered to the Sheriff of Montgomery County when it was mailed to him on October 11, 1972 for service on the defendants. Deposit of the letter, containing the summons, in the post-office box was tantamount to delivery to the Sheriff. This was within three years from the accrual of plaintiffs’ causes of action, and since the summons was personally served on the defendants on October 18, 1972, such service was timely and effectively niade within the provisions of CPLR 203 (subd. [b], par. 5).

Defendants’ motion must, therefore, be denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Physicians Formula Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the year ended March 31, 2007, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Ingrid Jackel, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or asa separate disclosure document.

Date: May 10,2007
| By:    | /s/ Ingrid Jackel       |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
| Name:  | Ingrid Jackel           |   |
| Title: | Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to Physicians Formula Holdings, Inc. and will be retained byPhysicians Formula Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
Re: Michelle VALENT v. Andrew M. SAUL

No. 19-221 (R46-09 / OT 2019)

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 10, 2019

The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed on December 10, 2019, pursuant to Rule 46.1 of the Rules of this Court.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 FEBRUARY 13, 2012

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 09-16389

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 08-20767-CR-UU

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus 

EDUARDO LOPEZ-HERNANDEZ, 

a.k.a. Rashy, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(February 13, 2012)

Before BARKETT, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Alvin E. Entin, appointed counsel for Eduardo Lopez-Hernandez in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738,

87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire

record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is

correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of

arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and LopezHernandez’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2
# Official Journal C 162A/23 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 162A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6023 May 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 162A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6023 May 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Europol |
| 2017/C 162 A/01 | Vacancy notice Europol/2017/TA/AD 15/282 — Executive Director of Europol | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Europol

2017/C 162 A/01

Vacancy notice Europol/2017/TA/AD 15/282 — Executive Director of Europol

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN