alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 99 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Relating to the disapproval of the President’s exercise of 

authority to suspend the debt limit, as submitted under 

section 1002(b) of the Continuing Appropriations Act, 

2014 on October 17, 2013. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves of the President’s exercise 
2 

•HJ 99 EH 

1 of authority to suspend the debt limit, as exercised pursu2 ant to the certification under section 1002(b) of the Con3 tinuing Appropriations Act, 2014. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 30, 

2013. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 99 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Relating to the disapproval of the President’s exer2013. tinuing Appropriations Act, 2014 on October 17, submitted under section 1002(b) of the Con- cise of authority to suspend the debt limit, as
Opinion issued September 27, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-16-00253-CR

———————————

KYLE JACKSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court at Law No. 3

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2075847

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Kyle Jackson, pleaded guilty to the misdemeanor offense of assault 

of a family member. The trial court found appellant guilty and, in accordance with 

the terms of appellant’s plea bargain agreement with the State, sentenced appellant 
2

to 355 days’ incarceration in county jail with 2 days credit. Appellant filed a pro se 

notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal.

In a plea bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were 

raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court’s 

permission to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed 

if a certification showing that the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made 

part of the record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

The trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See id. The 

trial court’s certification states that this is a plea bargain case and that the defendant 

has no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record supports the trial 

court’s certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2005). Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must dismiss this appeal. See 

Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of appeals, 

while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who plea-bargained is 

permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited appeal without 

further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bland, Massengale, and Lloyd.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
NO. 07-03-0415-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL D

	DECEMBER 20, 2004

	______________________________

	IN THE INTEREST OF S. M. J., J. E. J.

	AND 	J. P. J., CHILDREN

	________________________________

	FROM THE 251ST DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

	NO. 46,820-C; HONORABLE PATRICK PIRTLE, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Appellant, Michael S. James, joined by appellee Kimberly Dawn James, filed a Motion to Dismiss Appeal on December 15, 2004.

	No decision of this Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion.  Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.  No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.1.   All costs herein having been paid, no order pertaining to costs is made.  

							James T. Campbell

						    	        Justice
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018214EN.01001201.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 19.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 214/12 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.8850 — Kaiser+Kraft/Hoffmann/Simple System)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 214/11)

1.

On 8 June 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018214EN.01001201-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Kaiser+Kraft Europa GmbH (Germany), controlled by Franz Haniel & Cie GmbH (Germany), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Hoffmann SE (Germany), controlled by NV Holding GmbH (Austria), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Simple System GmbH & Co. KG (Germany). |

Kaiser+Kraft Europa GmbH (‘Kaiser+Kraft’, Germany) and Hoffmann SE (‘Hoffmann’, Germany) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of Simple System GmbH & Co. KG (‘Simple System’, Germany).

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   Kaiser+Kraft: specialised B2B mail order for equipment,

—   Hoffmann: trade, manufacture and distribution of standard tools and complementary products as well as accompanying services and consultancy,

—   Simple System: services for the B2B distribution of C-parts, in particular operation of an internet platform.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018214EN.01001201-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.8850 — Kaiser+Kraft/Hoffmann/Simple System

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Brussels |
| BELGIUM |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018214EN.01001201-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018214EN.01001201-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY
RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 CERTIFICATIONS I, Ronald A. Klein, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Origen Financial,
Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Dated: August 12, 2005/s/  Ronald A. KleinRonald A. Klein,
Chief Executive Officer of Origen Financial, Inc.
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 Eastern District of Texas

VIRTAMOVE, CORP.

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP.

2:24-cv-00064-JRG

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP.

04/10/2024 /s/ Brandon H. Brown

Brandon H. Brown / 266347

Kirkland & Ellis LLP

555 California Street

San Francisco, CA 94104

brandon.brown@kirkland.com

(415) 439-1670

(415) 439-1500

Case 2:24-cv-00064-JRG Document 14 Filed 04/10/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 116
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have 

consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s 

CM/ECF system pursuant to Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on April 10, 2024. 

/s/ Brandon H. Brown 

Brandon H. Brown 

Case 2:24-cv-00064-JRG Document 14 Filed 04/10/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 117
No. 70251 

# FILED JUN 2 7 2016
IE K. LINDEMAN ESUPfl E caGLIRT CHIEF() CL IRENA PIMKOVA, Appellant, vs. CRAIG A. BUSCH, Respondent. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA



### ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This appeal was docketed in this court on April 26, 2016, without payment of the requisite filing fee. On that same day a notice was issued directing appellant to pay the filing fee within ten days. The notice further advised that failure to pay the filing fee within ten days would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to this court's notice. Accordingly, cause appearing, this appeal is dismissed.

It is so ORDERED. CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT TRACE K. LINDEMAN BY: 

## 15atili 

## ■



## IkAnctic, cc: Hon. Timothy C. Williams, District Judge Irena Pimkova Pyatt Silvestri Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
CLERK'S ORDER 

# Zc 

# o lz (0)-1947
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Perspecta Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), John P. Kavanaugh, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|   |                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|a) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|b) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:June 29, 2018/s/ John P. KavanaughJohn P. KavanaughSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 44 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 44

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District of Columbia 
              Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 8, 2013

   Ms. Norton (for herself and Mr. Barletta) submitted the following 
     concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District of Columbia 
              Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF THE CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR DC SPECIAL 
              OLYMPICS LAW ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN.

    On September 27, 2013, or on such other date as the Speaker of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration 
of the Senate may jointly designate, the 28th Annual District of 
Columbia Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution 
referred to as the ``event'') may be run through the Capitol Grounds to 
carry the Special Olympics torch to honor local Special Olympics 
athletes.

SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

    The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as may be 
necessary to carry out the event.

SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

    The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for physical 
preparations for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, in connection with the event.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2018435EN.01003801.xml

| 3.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 435/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 435/38

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9213 — OYAK/Cimpor Portugal)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 435/08)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Ordu Yardimlaşma Kurumu (‘OYAK’), |
| --- | --- |

—

Ordu Yardimlaşma Kurumu (‘OYAK’),

| — | Cimpor Portugal, sgps, s.a. (‘Cimpor Portugal’) |
| --- | --- |

—

Cimpor Portugal, sgps, s.a. (‘Cimpor Portugal’)

OYAK acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Cimpor Portugal.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | OYAK is a pension fund in Turkey and its subsidiaries are active in a wide range of industries, namely mining, metallurgy, cement, concrete, paper, energy, chemicals, financial services, automotive and logistics, |
| --- | --- |

—

OYAK is a pension fund in Turkey and its subsidiaries are active in a wide range of industries, namely mining, metallurgy, cement, concrete, paper, energy, chemicals, financial services, automotive and logistics,

| — | Cimpor Portugal is a cement producer in Portugal and also has interests in Cape Verde. It is active in the production and commercialisation of cement, concrete, aggregates and mortars. |
| --- | --- |

—

Cimpor Portugal is a cement producer in Portugal and also has interests in Cape Verde. It is active in the production and commercialisation of cement, concrete, aggregates and mortars.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9213 — OYAK/Cimpor Portugal

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| --- |
| Fax: +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax: +32 22964301

Postal address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
Michael Ray INGRAM, Petitioner v. Frank CLEMENTS, et al.

No. 18-9140

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1044 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Disperse Blue 79:1. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2013 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Disperse 

Blue 79:1. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DISPERSE BLUE 79:1. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.03.46 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Disperse Blue 79:1) is amended by striking the date in 

7 the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2016’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1044 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN RE SANG HING WONG, Jr., Petitioner.

No. 19-5980

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Kevin MASSENGALE, Petitioner, v. MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE, ALASKA, et al.

No. 19-7704.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Mary Elizabeth SCHIPKE, Petitioner, v. CONNECTICUT, et al.

No. 18-9387

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 07, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
# C_2018001EN.01000201.xml

| 4.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 1/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 1/2

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case M.8451 — Tronox/Cristal)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 1/03)

On 20 December 2017, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the abovementioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the internal market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

1

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.8451 — Tronox/Cristal, to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
Dwayne B. SHERON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8131.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 4, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1071 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1071

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and thirteen

                                 An Act

 
 To specify the size of the precious-metal blanks that will be used in 
   the production of the National Baseball Hall of Fame commemorative 
                                 coins.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SIZE OF PRECIOUS-METAL BLANKS.
    Section 3(a) of the National Baseball Hall of Fame Commemorative 
Coin Act (Public Law 112-152) is amended--
        (1) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking ``have'' and inserting 
    ``be struck on a planchet having a''; and
        (2) in paragraph (2)(B), by striking ``have a'' and inserting 
    ``be struck on a planchet having a''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```