alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,752
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,246
<PP&E>                                       1,258,584
<DEPRECIATION>                                  57,543
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,239,823
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,666
<BONDS>                                        322,150
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         88
<COMMON>                                           363
<OTHER-SE>                                     805,356
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,239,823
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,772
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,473
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,922
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,859
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,859
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed July 9, 2015.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-15-00747-CV

SHIVER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Appellant

V.

TUCKER ALBIN & ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-05524-D

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Brown and Stoddart

Opinion by Justice Brown

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss appeal, stating the trial court has granted its 

motion for new trial. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a)(1).

 

150747F.P05

/Ada Brown/

ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

SHIVER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, 

Appellant

No. 05-15-00747-CV V.

TUCKER ALBIN & ASSOCIATES, INC., 

Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

No. 4, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-05524-D.

Opinion delivered by Justice Brown. Chief 

Justice Wright and Justice Stoddart 

participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER appellee Tucker Albin & Associates, Inc., recover its costs, if any, of this 

appeal from appellant Shiver Construction Company. 

Judgment entered this 9th day of July, 2015.
RaShawn LONG, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9801

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 10.4      Settlement Agreement - Bruce Bachelor

                             AMENDMENT AGREEMENT TO
                     SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE


This Amendment Agreement is made and entered into as part of the Settlement
Agreement and Mutual Release made and entered into by and Emergency Filtration
Products, Inc., a Nevada Corporation (hereinafter "EMFP") and Bruce Batchelor
(hereinafter "Batchelor").

This Amendment Agreement is made with reference to the following facts:

     (a) On June 2, 2000 the parties executed the Settlement Agreement and
Mutual Release to resolve all of their differences.

     (b) EMFP subsequently was financially unable to meet the obligation of the
monthly payment to Batchelor and was declared by Batchelor to be in default
according to the terms of the Agreement on July 5, 2001.

     (c) The parties wish to cure the default and to amend the Settlement
Agreement and Mutual Release executed on June 2, 2000 by EMFP and Batchelor
which shall remain in full effect with the following changes:

1. Obligation. The only remaining obligation that survives the execution of this
Amendment Agreement to the Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release is the
obligation by EMFP to issue shares of the common stock of EMFP to Batchelor.
EMFP shall immediately issue to Batchelor 50,000 shares of common stock and
register those shares through an S-8 Filing with Securities and Exchange
Commission. In addition, EMFP shall immediately issue 185,000 restricted shares
of common stock to Batchelor. Batchelor agrees that all principal and interest
amounts due him under the terms of the prior agreement in Item 2 are paid in
full by the 235,000 shares of the common stock of EMFP.

IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement effective as
of the date indicated below.


Dated: Sept. 30________, 2001
                                             \s\ Bruce Batchelor
                                             ----------------------
                                             Bruce Batchelor


Dated: Sept 30_______, 2001                  Emergency Filtration Products, Inc.


                                             \s\ Douglas K. Beplate
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Douglas K. Beplate, President
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 24-0054

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

THOMAS CURRAN

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until April 8, 2024 to prepare, 

file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

March 4 2024

03/04/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0054
<Page>


                                                                  Exhibit 10.7.2


                               SECOND AMENDMENT TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


       THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this "SECOND AMENDMENT")
is executed as of the 1st day of August 2003, by and between STANDARD PARKING
CORPORATION (formerly known as "APCOA/Standard Parking, Inc.) (the "Company"), a
Delaware corporation having offices in Chicago, Illinois, formerly known as
APCOA, Inc. and ROBERT N. SACKS (the "EXECUTIVE"), an individual residing in
Glencoe, Illinois.


                                R E C I T A L S:


       A. The Company and the Executive are parties to a certain Employment
Agreement dated as of May 18, 1998 (the " Employment Agreement"), as modified
and amended by the First Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November
7, 2001 (the "First Amendment"). The Employment Agreement, as modified by the
First Amendment are hereinafter together referred to as the "Employment
Agreement".

       B.     The Company and the Executive desire to clarify a provision in the
Employment Agreement by making a certain technical correction to the document as
set forth herein.


       NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above premises and the agreements
and covenants hereinafter contained the parties hereto, intending to be legally
bound, mutually agree as follows:


       1.     The foregoing recitals are hereby incorporated into and shall
constitute a part of this Second Amendment. All capitalized terms used herein
and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the
Employment Agreement.



       2.     Paragraph 4 of EXHIBIT B SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION PLAN is hereby
amended by deleting the words "... prior to age 65..." in the first sentence so
that the paragraph now reads in its entirety as follows:

              "4. If the Executive shall die while in the active employment of
              the Company, the Company shall pay the Executive's designated
              beneficiary an aggregate of $416,980.00 in 60 equal monthly
              installments of $6,949.66 The first installment shall be paid on
              the first day of the month following the month in which the
              Executive dies."


                                       1
<Page>

       3.     Except to the extent expressly modified by this Second Amendment,
all of the terms and provisions of the Employment Agreement are hereby confirmed
and remain in full force and effect.

       IN WITNESS WHERE OF, the Company and the Executive have executed this
Second Amendment as of the day and year first written above.


COMPANY:                                    EXECUTIVE:

Standard Parking Corporation


By:      /s/ James A. Wilhelm                     /s/ Robert N. Sacks
   ----------------------------------       ----------------------------------
         James A. Wilhelm                         Robert N. Sacks
President and Chief Executive Officer


                                       2
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC.  PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  (CHAPTER 98, TITLE 15 U.S.C. SS. 7241)

I,
Gilbert M. Cassagne, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13(a)-15(f) and
15(d)-15(f)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



Date:
November 7, 2008

|                                                                     |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ GILBERT M. CASSAGNE Gilbert M. Cassagne,
Chief Executive Officer |  | 

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 31.a

I, John P. Manning, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BCTC V Assignor Corp. (the "Assignor");
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Assignor as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The Assignor's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Assignor and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the Assignor, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the Assignor's disclosure controls and procedures  and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



1. The Assignor's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Assignor's auditors and the audit committee of the Assignor's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Assignor's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Assignor's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  May 13, 2005 | /s/ John P. Manning 
|------------------- | --------------------
|                    | John P. Manning     
|                    | Director, President 
|                    | (Principal Executive
|                    | Officer), BCTC V    
|                    | Assignor Corp.
JB Foster MCAFEE, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6704

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
SMITH BARNEY INVESTMENT TRUST
10f-3 REPORT
December 1, 1997 through May 31, 1998



			Trade					          Purchase
	% of
Issuer			Date	Selling Dealer		Amount	
	Price	Issue

New York City G.O	12/22/97	Samuel Ramirez & Co.	$1,250,000	$96.920
	1.85%
5.125% due 8/1/2013	

NY Local Gov't Asst. Corp.	12/18/97	Lehman Brothers		  
6,000,000	  96.695	18.60
4.750% due 11/15/2014

New York City TFA	1/14/98	Samuel Ramirez & Co.	  1,170,000	  98.935
	3.33
4.600% due 11/15/2012

Municipal Assistance Corp.	1/15/98	Bear Stearns		  1,000,000	 
106.817	0.66
5.250% due 7/1/2005

Puerto Rico G.O.		1/15/98	Morgan Stanley		  
2,500,000	  45.520	4.90
0.000% due 7/1/2014

MTA Transit Authority	1/22/98	Paine Webber		  1,000,000	  
99.501	5.45
4.600% due 7/1/2011

NYS Dorm Presbyterian Hosp.1/23/98	Goldman Sachs		  1,000,000
	108.440	2.96
5.500% due 8/1/2011

Orange County, CA	3/25/98	Lehman Brothers		  1.000,000
	107.883	0.43
5.500% due 2/15/2009
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018234EN.01000601.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 5.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/6 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.8946 — Lindsay Goldberg/Coveris Rigid)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 234/06)

1.

On 25 June 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018234EN.01000601-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Goldberg, Lindsay & Co., LLC (‘Lindsay Goldberg’, USA), and |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | the rigid plastic packaging business of Coveris Group (‘Coveris Rigid’, Germany/Luxembourg), consisting of Coveris International Holdings SARL, Coveris Rigid Deutschland GmbH and Coveris Rigid (Ravensburg) Deutschland GmbH (and their respective subsidiaries). |

Lindsay Goldberg acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Coveris Rigid.

The concentration is accomplished by way of a purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Lindsay Goldberg: private equity investment firm with 16 portfolio companies, none of which is active in the production and supply of rigid plastic packaging products in the EEA,

—   for Coveris Rigid: production and sale of rigid plastic packaging solutions such as pots and containers, trays, closures, lids, and sheets, based on different materials for use in various downstream industry sectors.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018234EN.01000601-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.8946 — Lindsay Goldberg/Coveris Rigid

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018234EN.01000601-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018234EN.01000601-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
# C_2018034EN.01000401.xml

| 31.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8745 — CD&R/D'Ieteren/Belron)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 34/04)

On 19 January 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8745. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8745. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET-WTI - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                      Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/15/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      512,118
COMMITMENTS
  86,920   44,797  124,877  283,097  328,990  494,894  498,664   17,224   13,454

CHANGES FROM 07/08/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     14,740)
  -6,451    9,130    2,005   17,927    2,637   13,481   13,772    1,259      968

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    17.0      8.7     24.4     55.3     64.2     96.6     97.4      3.4      2.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      145)
      35       37       64       66       61      137      131
```

----

Updated July 18, 2014
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2511 In Re: WILBUR P. HOLLAR and RUTH CAROL HOLLAR, Debtors.

_________________________ WILBUR P. HOLLAR; RUTH CAROL HOLLAR, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-351-2, BK-93-11389C-7W) Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 15, 1996 Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wilbur P. Hollar, Ruth Carol Hollar, Appell ants Pro Se. Thomas Pearson Holderness, Lawrence P. Blaskopf, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order affirming the bankruptcy court's dismissal of this action on the basis of res judicata. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hollar v. United States , Nos. CA95-351-2; BK-93-11389C-7W (M.D.N.C. June 14, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED