alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018031EN.01000201.xml

| 27.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/2

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections or the measure does not constitute aid

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 31/02)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 21.12.2017 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.49509 (2017/N) |
| Member State | Slovakia |
| Region | Východné Slovensko, Západné Slovensko, Stredné Slovensko | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Preferential taxes for biofuels |
| Legal basis | Zákon č. 358/2015 Z. z., Zákon č. 98/2004 Z. z. o spotrebnej dani z minerálneho oleja v znení neskorších predpisov (ďalej len „zákon č. 98/2004 Z. z.“) |
| Type of measure | Scheme | — |
| Objective | Environmental protection |
| Form of aid | Tax rate reduction |
| Budget | Overall budget: EUR 607.08 (in millions) |
| Intensity | 0 % |
| Duration (period) | 01.01.2018 - 31.12.2023 |
| Economic sectors | All economic sectors eligible to receive aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky |
| Lazovná 63, 974 01 Banská Bystrica |

Date of adoption of the decision

21.12.2017

Aid number

SA.49509 (2017/N)

Member State

Slovakia

Region

Východné Slovensko, Západné Slovensko, Stredné Slovensko

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Preferential taxes for biofuels

Legal basis

Zákon č. 358/2015 Z. z., Zákon č. 98/2004 Z. z. o spotrebnej dani z minerálneho oleja v znení neskorších predpisov (ďalej len „zákon č. 98/2004 Z. z.“)

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Environmental protection

Form of aid

Tax rate reduction

Budget

Overall budget: EUR 607.08 (in millions)

Intensity

0 %

Duration (period)

01.01.2018 - 31.12.2023

Economic sectors

All economic sectors eligible to receive aid

Name and address of the granting authority

Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky

Lazovná 63, 974 01 Banská Bystrica

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm.

---
Randall Wayne MAYS, Petitioner v. TEXAS.

No. 19-5839

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 12, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
Carol BANGURA, Petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA, et al.

No. 19-7462.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**     I, Travis E. Baugh, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of MicroMed Cardiovascular, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;     4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and          (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and     5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small businessissuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 15, 2006         By: /s/ Travis E. Baugh       Travis E. Baugh      President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief      Financial Officer  
22
Michael BRUNO, AS Parent, Guardian, and NEXT FRIEND OF R. B., a Minor, et al., Petitioners, v. NORTHSIDE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.

No. 19-1148.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 26, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 4.1

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                       TO
                          CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT

      THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING SERVICES  AGREEMENT,  dated January 13,
2004 (the "First Amendment"),  is by and among Moshe Grauman (the "Consultant"),
and Dtomi, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Client").

                                    RECITALS

      A. The  Consultant  and the  Client  entered  into a  Consulting  Services
Agreement dated August 21, 2003, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A
(the  "Agreement"),  pursuant to which the Consultant  agreed to provide certain
consulting services to the Client.

      B.  Client and  Consultant  wish to amend  Section 4 of the  Agreement  to
provide for  additional  consideration  in exchange  for  additional  consulting
services.

                                    AGREEMENT

      NOW,  THEREFORE,  in  consideration  of  the  foregoing,  and  the  mutual
agreements, representations,  warranties and covenants contained herein, and for
other  good  and  valuable   consideration   the  receipt  of  which  is  hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

A.    Section 4 of the Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and shall read
      as follows:

"4.  Compensation.  Compensation  shall be for management  consulting  services,
identifying  potential customers for Dtomi,  assisting in writing business plans
and projections,  identifying  acquisition  candidates and identifying potential
board  of  directors  candidates.  As  compensation  for  management  consulting
services,  the Company  shall pay the  Consultant  600,000  Shares of the Common
Stock of Dtomi, Inc. (OTCBB: DTOI).

EXECUTED on the date first set forth above.

                                        CLIENT:

                                        DTOMI, INC.


                                        By:_____________________________________
                                           David M. Otto - Chairman of the Board


                                       7
<PAGE>

                                        CONSULTANT:

                                        MOSHE GRAUMAN


                                        ________________________________________


                                       8
Marcel MALACHOWSKI, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19M65

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Exhibit 32.1

                      CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of
Veridium Corporation (the "Company"), certifies that:

1.	The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the Quarter
ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)); and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: May 22, 2006                       /S/ KEVIN KREISLER
                                          ---------------------------
                                          KEVIN KREISLER
                                          Chief Executive Officer and
                                           Chief Financial Officer


This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any
other purpose.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**

D1050-084,  8th Floor

401  South Tryon St.

Charlotte,  NC 28202

1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December1, 2017, by and among UBS COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIZATION CORP., asDepositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTOCAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Trustee, and PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Operating Advisorand as Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates Series 2017-C6 (the "Agreement"). Capitalizedterms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in theAgreement. 

 

Pursuantto Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice Presidentof Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that: 

 

1.A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period fromDecember 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and 

 

2.To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary 2018. 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober 

DanielBober 

ExecutiveVice President

WellsFargo Bank 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo)  Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 28 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 28

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
 limit the power of Congress to impose a tax on a failure to purchase 
                           goods or services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2013

   Mr. Palazzo introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
 limit the power of Congress to impose a tax on a failure to purchase 
                           goods or services.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Congress shall make no law that imposes a tax on a failure to 
purchase goods or services.''.
                                 <all>
```
Martin MARQUARDT, Deputy Sheriff, Petitioner v. William FLETCHER

No. 19-76

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 21, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Danny HOWELL, Petitioner v. Duane SOUTHERLAND, et al.

No. 19-5898

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Eastern Division denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

JOE DANIEL ADAMS §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-cv-389

JAMES PAYNE, ET AL. §

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiff Joe Daniel Adams, formerly an inmate in the Shelby County Jail, proceeding pro

se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several Defendants.

Discussion

When, as in this case, jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1391 provides that venue is proper only in the judicial district where the defendants reside or in

which the claim arose. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), for the convenience of parties and witnesses and

in the interests of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division

where it could have been brought.

The actions allegedly taken by Defendants took place in Shelby County, which is located in

the Lufkin Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Plaintiff’s

claims therefore arose in the Lufkin Division. In addition, Defendants appear to reside in Shelby

County. However, this case was filed in the Beaumont Division. 

The court has considered the circumstances and determined that the interest of justice would

be served if the complaint were transferred to the division in which the claims arose. It is

accordingly

Case 1:23-cv-00389-MAC-CLS Document 19 Filed 12/07/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 149
ORDERED that this civil rights action is TRANSFERRED to the Lufkin Division of the

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.

2

___________________________________

Christine L Stetson

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SIGNED this the 7th day of December, 2023.

Case 1:23-cv-00389-MAC-CLS Document 19 Filed 12/07/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 150
Reginald CHATMAN, Petitioner v. FLORIDA

No. 19-6183

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District denied.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 of Convenientcast, Inc. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.





Very truly yours,








/s/Kevin M. MurphyKevin M. MurphyChief Executive OfficerAugust 15, 2010/s/ Howard BouchHoward BouchChief Financial OfficerDated: August 15, 2010








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to


Convenientcast, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted  Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Longport, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul D. Wilson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

Dated:
April 8, 2004

| |  | /s/Paul D. WilsonName: Paul D. Wilson
Title: Chief Financial Officer |  | 
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

1

---

QuickLinks
## F IFTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D2 024
- 0279 LT Case No. 2018
- CF
- 004648 -A

_____________________________ R OLANDO R ODNEY , Appella nt, v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee .

_____________________________ 3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County. Lisa D. Herndon, Judge. Rolando Rodney, Monticello, pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison Leigh Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. July 3 0, 20 24 P ER C URIAM . A FFIRMED . E DWARDS , C.J., and H ARRIS and S OUD , J J., concur.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Joseph J.Jaeger, certify that:

1.                I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Physicians Formula Holdings, Inc.;

2.                Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4.                The registrant’sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a.                  designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.                 evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c.                  disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                The registrant’sother certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

a.                  all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b.                 any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 10,2007
| By:    | /s/ Joseph J. Jaeger    |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
| Name:  | Joseph J. Jaeger        |   |
| Title: | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
Jorge A. MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8133.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 27, 2020

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
**Exhibit 8.1**

 

**LIST OF SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES AND PRINCIPAL CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATED ENTITIES***

 
| **Significant Subsidiaries**                         | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of Incorporation** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------------------|
|                                                      |       |                                        |
| Bilibili HK Limited                                       |       | Hong Kong                                   |
| Hode HK Limited                                           |       | Hong Kong                                   |
| Bilibili Co., Ltd.                                   |       | Japan                                       |
| Shanghai Bilibili Technology Co., Ltd.               |       | PRC                                         |
| Hode Shanghai Limited                                     |       | PRC                                         |
|                                                      |       |                                        |
| **Consolidated Variable Interest Entity**                 |       |                                        |
| Shanghai Kuanyu Digital Technology Co., Ltd.         |       | PRC                                         |
| Shanghai Hode Information Technology Co., Ltd.       |       | PRC                                         |
|                                                      |       |                                        |
| **Subsidiary of Consolidated Variable Interest   Entity** |       |                                        |
| Sharejoy Network Technology Co., Ltd.                |       | PRC                                         |
| Shanghai Hehehe Culture Communication Co., Ltd.           |       | PRC                                         |
| Shanghai Anime Tamashi Cultural Media Co., Ltd.      |       | PRC                                         |

 

----

*                 Other entities of Bilibili Inc. have been omitted from this list since, considered in the aggregate as a single entity, they would not constitute a significant subsidiary.

 

----
Peter J. HANSON, Petitioner, v. WISCONSIN.

No. 19-5758

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Wisconsin denied.
Erickson Meko CAMPBELL, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9631

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.