alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-06-0353-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

JANUARY 8, 2007

______________________________

ROBERT REYES, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. ONE OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2005-495,451; HONORABLE LARRY B. “RUSTY” LADD, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Following a plea of not guilty, Appellant Robert Reyes was convicted by a jury of

driving while intoxicated. Punishment was assessed at 120 days confinement in the

Lubbock County Jail. After the clerk’s record was filed, this Court discovered that it did not

contain a certification of defendant’s right of appeal as required by Rule 25.2 of the Texas
2

Rules of Appellate Procedure. Pursuant to Rule 37.1, Appellant was notified by letter

dated November 17, 2006, of the omission and directed to file a certification with the trial

court clerk within 30 days. By that same letter, the Court also directed the trial court clerk

to provide a supplemental clerk’s record containing the certification or notify the Clerk of

this Court if a certification was not timely filed. On December 28, 2006, the trial court clerk

advised that no certification was received. 

Rule 25.2(d) provides that the appeal “must be dismissed” if a certification that

shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record under

these rules. Consequently, having complied with the applicable rules of appellate

procedure, we must dismiss the appeal. 

Appellant filed a motion for extension of time in which to file his brief on January 4,

2007. Our disposition of this appeal renders that motion moot.

Patrick A. Pirtle

 Justice

Do not publish.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7429

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BILLY JOE SCOTT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:11-cr-00128-D-1; 5:16-cv-00598-D)

Submitted: February 18, 2020 Decided: February 21, 2020

Before MOTZ, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Billy Joe Scott, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Billy Joe Scott seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2255 (2018) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2018). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2018). When the district court denies relief on the merits, 

a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that 

the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. See 

Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 92012) (citing Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Scott has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss this 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Maxcium HERRING, Petitioner v. L.S. MCEWEN, Warden

No. 19-6216

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# C_2018332EN.01000102.xml

| 19.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 332/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 332/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9035 — Charlesbank/Partners Group/H-Food Holdings)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 332/02)

On 13 September 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9035. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9035. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Keyon W. CARRAWAY, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6569

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  each of the  undersigned  officers of GS CleanTech
Corporation (the "Company"), certifies that:

     1.   The  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB of the  Company for the quarter
          ended  June  30,  2006  (the   "Report")   fully   complies  with  the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
          of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                    /S/   KEVIN KREISLER
                    ----------------------------------
                          KEVIN KREISLER
                          Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Date:                     August 21, 2006



This  certification  is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,
subject  to the  knowledge  standard  contained  therein,  and not for any other
purpose.
# C_2018239EN.01000101.xml

| 9.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.7.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8928 — Francisco Partners/Verifone Systems)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 239/01)

On 22 June 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8928. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8928. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2018403EN.01000101.xml

| 9.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 403/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 403/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9117 — Saudi Aramco/Arlanxeo)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 403/01)

On 25 October 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9117. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9117. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-20160

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SALVADOR JUAREZ-URIBE, also known as Jaime Pineda Diaz, also known 

as Salvador Juarez Uribe,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:13-CR-243-1

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Salvador JuarezUribe has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Juarez-Uribe has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 4, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-20160 Document: 00512825483 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/04/2014
No. 14-20160

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 14-20160 Document: 00512825483 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/04/2014
<PAGE>



                                  EXHIBIT 32.1
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with
the Quarterly Report of Avondale Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended May 28, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, G. Stephen Felker, Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




Date: July 8, 2004                             /s/ G. STEPHEN FELKER
                                               -----------------------------
                                               G. Stephen Felker
                                               Chairman, President and Chief
                                                  Executive Officer
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0001701

25-OCT-2016

08:01 AM
Billy Gene DRAKE, Petitioner, v. Les PARISH, Warden.

No. 18-9345

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 07, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Anyiam ANYANWU, Petitioner v. William P. BARR, Attorney General;

No. 19-5211

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the reference to our firm under the captions "Financial
Highlights" and "Independent Auditors" and to the use of our report 
dated December 15, 1998, on the Concert Investment Series (comprising, 
respectively, the Emerging Growth Fund, Government Fund, Growth Fund, 
Growth and Income Fund, International Equity Fund and Municipal Bond 
Fund) which is incorporated by reference in this Registration Statement 
(Form N-1A No. 33-11716 and 811-5018) of the Concert Investment Series.



                                      ERNST & YOUNG LLP


New York, New York
February 23, 1999
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000797480
<NAME> SMITH BARNEY SECTOR SERIES
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER>002
   <NAME>SMITH BARNEY FINANCIAL SERVICES FUND

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              8 Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 OCT-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                      OCT-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>             62,961,866
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>            73,854,933
<RECEIVABLES>                      7,001,724
<ASSETS-OTHER>                             0
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                     238
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    80,856,895
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>           6,839,347
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                    0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                  0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                6,839,347
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                            0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>          60,555,611
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>              1,815,227
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                      0
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>             18,454
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                     0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>            2,373,976
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                   0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>          10,887,257
<NET-ASSETS>                      73,835,299
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                    664,565
<INTEREST-INCOME>                     41,152
<OTHER-INCOME>                             0
<EXPENSES-NET>                       687,263
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>               18,454
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>           2,373,976
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>         10,887,258
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>             13,279,688
<EQUALIZATION>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                  0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                   0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                      0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>           67,499,965
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>       (6,944,354)
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                        0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>            73,835,299
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                    0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                  0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                    0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                 0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                260,242
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                      866,806
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>              18,920,050
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                  11.40
<PER-SHARE-NII>                        (0.01)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                 0.00
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                    0.00
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>               0.00
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                    0.00
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                    15.81
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                         2.25
[AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING]                     0
[AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE]                       0



</TABLE>
Dennis WHITE, Petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 19-5847

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Franklin County denied.
Lakshmi ARUNACHALAM, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, et al.

No. 18-9386

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 03/05/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      703,491
COMMITMENTS
  82,120   48,448  218,630  384,534  419,357  685,284  686,436   18,207   17,055

CHANGES FROM 02/26/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     32,230)
   5,744   -2,059   23,769    6,624   12,546   36,137   34,256   -3,907   -2,027

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    11.7      6.9     31.1     54.7     59.6     97.4     97.6      2.6      2.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      158)
      51       33       71       65       64      146      143
```

----

Updated March 8, 2013
Lashon BROWNING, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6673

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Chris Ann JAYE, Petitioner, v. OAK KNOLL VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., et al.

No. 18-1374

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
Relonzo PHILLIPS, Petitioner v. DEKALB COUNTY ASSISTANT PUBLIC DEFENDERS, et al.

No. 19-5708

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia denied.
<PAGE>


                          MORSE, ZELNICK, ROSE & LANDER
                         A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP

                                 405 PARK AVENUE
                          NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022-4405
                                  212-838-1177
                               FAX - 212-838-9190


                                                            WRITER'S DIRECT LINE
                                                                  (212) 838-8040



                                 April 15, 2003

Mr. Thomas Stuckey
Milestone Scientific, Inc.
220 South Orange Avenue
Livingston, New Jersey 07039

Dear Tom:

         This will confirm that we have agreed to defer payment of an additional
$160,000 in fees due to us until January 2, 2005, except for payments out of
future profits or the net proceeds of equity financings.

         This will further inform that the $160,000 balance of the amount
deferred last year until January 2, 2003 (after giving effect to a $90,000
payment in restricted shares of Common Stock), is now deferred until January 2,
2005 except for payments out of future profits or the net proceeds of equity
financings, provided that it does not impact operations.


                                                              Very truly yours,




                                                              Stephen A. Zelnick

SAZ/ds
EXHIBIT 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund V L.P. (the "Fund") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer of the Fund's general partner, Boston Capital Associates V, L.L.C., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                  
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.



|                |  |                            
|--------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:           |  |                            
|August 19, 2004 |  | /s/ John P. Manning        
|                |  |                            
|                |  | John P. Manning            
|                |  | Principal Executive Officer
|                |  |                            
|                |  |                            



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## **EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS REQUIRED BYSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof Steinway Musical Instruments, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter endedJune 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Dana D. Messina, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.
|                |   | /s/ Dana D. Messina                   |   |
|----------------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|           |   |                                  |
|           |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|           |   | (Principal Executive Officer)         |
|           |   |                                  |
|           |   |                                  |
| August 9, 2006 |   |                                  |

 

----