alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Louie M. SCHEXNAYDER, Jr. v. Darrel VANNOY, Warden

No. 18-8341

Supreme Court of the United States.

Decided December 9, 2019

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Statement of Justice SOTOMAYOR respecting the denial of certiorari.

In 2007, a former employee of Louisiana's Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal shot himself in his courthouse office. The employee left a suicide note claiming that he had been tormented by his involvement in that Court of Appeal's secret, 13-year policy *355of summarily denying *pro se* appeals. Purpura, Fifth Circuit Ordered To Review Appeals; Due Process Denied, Supreme Court Says, New Orleans, La., Times-Picayune, Oct. 7, 2008, p. 1. The note reportedly stated that no judge had reviewed a habeas application filed by a *pro se* inmate during that time; instead, courthouse staff prepared rulings that judges signed "without so much as a glance" at the underlying petitions or any review of the applications' merits. *Johnson v. Parish of Jefferson* , 2009 WL 1808718, *4 (E.D. La., June 19, 2009).

In response to this revelation, the Louisiana Supreme Court approved a procedure whereby a three-judge panel-drawn from the same pool of Court of Appeal judges who had allegedly summarily rejected *pro se* filings-would re-review hundreds of *pro se* submissions that had been dismissed without consideration. *State v. Cordero* , 2008-1717 (La. 10/3/08), 993 So.2d 203. Justice John L. Weimer dissented from that decision, arguing that the cases should be assigned to judges sitting on other courts of appeal to "avoid any appearance of impropriety." *Id.* , at 214.

Petitioner's case, which primarily challenges the effectiveness of his counsel and various trial errors, was one of the many matters swept up in the Louisiana Court of Appeal's original review process and the re-review remedy ordered by the Louisiana Supreme Court. After the state courts dismissed his claims, petitioner filed for federal habeas relief. He argued that the Louisiana courts did not fairly review his filings on the merits-either originally or through the re-review process-and so he was entitled to *de novo* federal review without any of the deference ordinarily afforded to state-court rulings under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA). The Magistrate Judge dismissed the habeas petition after applying AEDPA deference.

Petitioner, who was *pro se* during various stages of the lower court proceedings, did not clearly set forth his claim that he was entitled to habeas review without AEDPA deference when he sought a certificate of appealability from the District Court and, later, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Accordingly, the Court of Appeals was not fairly presented with the opportunity to resolve the issue that petitioner now presents to this Court. For this reason, I do not dissent from this Court's denial of certiorari. The re-review procedure adopted by the Louisiana courts, however, raises serious due process concerns. I expect that lower federal courts will examine the issue of what deference is due to these decisions when it is properly raised.
Hayes B. MILLIMAN, Petitioner v. Timothy L. RANDALL

No. 18-1281

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 519 

Designating October 30, 2012, as a national day of remembrance for nuclear 

weapons program workers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 16, 2012 

Mr. UDALL of Colorado (for himself, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. 

BROWN of Ohio, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. CORKER, Mr. CRAPO, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. REID, and Mr. UDALL of 

New Mexico) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

AUGUST 1, 2012 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating October 30, 2012, as a national day of 

remembrance for nuclear weapons program workers. 

Whereas, since World War II, hundreds of thousands of men 

and women, including uranium miners, millers, and haulers, have served the United States by building nuclear 

weapons for the defense of the United States; 

Whereas those dedicated workers paid a high price for their 

service to develop a nuclear weapons program for the 

benefit of the United States, including by developing disabling or fatal illnesses; 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 519 ATS 

Whereas the Senate recognized the contribution, service, and 

sacrifice those patriotic men and women made for the defense of the United States in Senate Resolution 151, 

111th Congress, agreed to May 20, 2009; Senate Resolution 653, 111th Congress, agreed to September 28, 2010; 

and Senate Resolution 275, 112th Congress, agreed to 

September 26, 2011; 

Whereas a national day of remembrance time capsule has 

been crossing the United States, collecting artifacts and 

the stories of nuclear weapons program workers relating 

to the nuclear defense era of the United States, and a 

remembrance quilt has been constructed to memorialize 

the contribution of those workers; 

Whereas the stories and artifacts reflected in the time capsule and the remembrance quilt reinforce the importance 

of recognizing nuclear weapons program workers; and 

Whereas those patriotic men and women deserve to be recognized for the contribution, service, and sacrifice they have 

made for the defense of the United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates October 30, 2012, as a national 

3 day of remembrance for the nuclear weapons pro4 gram workers, including uranium miners, millers, 

5 and haulers, of the United States; and 

6 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

7 to support and participate in appropriate cere8 monies, programs, and other activities to commemo9 rate October 30, 2012, as a national day of rememVerDate Mar 15 2010 00:39 Aug 02, 2012 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SR519.ATS SR519

pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

SRES 519 ATS 

1 brance for past and present workers in the nuclear 

2 weapons program of the United States. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of CEA Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 (the
"Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I J. Patrick Michaels, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


By: /s/ J. Patrick Michaels, Jr.                         Dated: May 14, 2004
   --------------------------------------
        J. Patrick Michaels, Jr.
        Chief Executive Officer
        (Principal Executive Officer)
Forge Dennis MILEHAM, Petitioner, v. Jeff PREMO, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary

No. 19-5074

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Independent Auditors' Consent




To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
the Smith Barney Equity Funds:

We consent to the incorporation by reference, in the respective
Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information, of our report
dated March 8, 2000, on the statements of assets and liabilities
for the Smith Barney Large Cap Blend Fund and Concert Social
Awareness Fund of Smith Barney Equity Funds (the "Funds") as of
January 31, 2000, and the related statements of operations for the
year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each
of the years in the two-year period then ended and the financial
highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then
ended. These financial statements and financial highlights and our
report thereon are included in the Annual Reports of the Fund as
filed on Form N-30D.

We also consent to the references to our firm under the headings
"Financial Highlights" in the  respective Prospectus and "Auditors"
in the Statement of Additional Information.



KPMG LLP

New York, New York
May 23, 2000
Independent Auditors' Consent



To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Municipal High Income Fund Inc.:

We consent to the use of our report dated December 8, 1998, with 
respect to Municipal High Income Fund Inc., incorporated herein 
by reference and to the references to our Firm under the headings 
"Financial Highlights" and "Independent Auditors" in the 
Prospectus and "Independent Public Accountants" in the Statement 
of Additional Information.



	KPMG 
LLP


New York, New York
January 14, 1999
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/01/14          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      357,046
COMMITMENTS
 114,839  145,412   87,429  137,941   99,972  340,209  332,813   16,837   24,233

CHANGES FROM 03/25/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     21,220)
   5,729   29,098       91   20,180   -4,102   26,000   25,087   -4,780   -3,867

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    32.2     40.7     24.5     38.6     28.0     95.3     93.2      4.7      6.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      189)
      64       66       69       40       40      139      151
```

----

Updated April 4, 2014
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6563

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

EDWARD R. BUTLER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, Chief District Judge.

(CR-97-146-S, CA-02-561-S)

Submitted: September 19, 2002 Decided: September 27, 2002

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward R. Butler, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Michael DiBiagio, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Edward R. Butler seeks to appeal the district court’s orders

denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000),

and denying his motions for reconsideration and for recusal. We

have reviewed the record and conclude on the reasoning of the

district court that Butler has not made a substantial showing of

the denial of a constitutional right. See United States v. Butler,

Nos. CR-97-146-S; CA-02-561-S (D. Md. Feb. 22, 2002; Mar. 5 2002;

Mar. 12, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability

and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Cite as Chernin v. Geauga Park Dist. , 2018-Ohio-1717.]

{¶1} On August 14, 2017, requester Shelley Chernin made a public records request to respondent Geauga Park District for a copy of a constituent letter used by Park District board member Andrej Lah during a board meeting. (Complaint at 3.) On August 28, 2017, Park District Executive Director John Oros responded that “the letter is not considered to be a public record.” ( Id . at 5.) On November 17, 2017, Chernin filed a complaint under R.C. 2743.75 alleging denial of timely access to public records in violation of R.C. 149.43(B). Following unsuccessful mediation, the Park District filed a motion to dismiss, and filed an unredacted copy of the requested letters under seal. On March 26, 2018, Special Master Clark issued a report finding that the constituent letters constituted records of the Geauga Park District, and recommending that the court issue an order GRANTING Chernin’s claim for production of the requested records. {¶2} R.C. 2743.75(F)(2) states, in part: “Either party may object to the report and recommendation within seven business days after receiving the report and recommendation by filing a written objection with the clerk * * *.” No objections were filed by either party. The court determines that there is no error of law or other defect evident on the face of the Special Master’s decision. Therefore, the court adopts the Special Master’s report and recommendation as its own, including findings of fact and

conclusions of law contained therein. {¶3} Court costs are assessed against the respondent, and respondent is further ordered to make payment of twenty-five dollars to requester as recovery of her filing fee SHELLEY K. CHERNIN

Requester

v.

GEAUGA PARK DISTRICT

Respondent Case No. 2017-00922PQ

Judge Patrick M. McGrath

ENTRY ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF SPECIAL MASTERCase No. 2017-00922PQ -2- ENTRY

in this case. On provision of invoices or other sufficient evidence, Chernin is further entitled to recover from the Geauga Park District any other costs associated with the action that were incurred by her. R.C. 2743.75(F)(3)(b). The clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal.

PATRICK M. McGRATH Judge

Filed April 17, 2018 Sent to S.C. Reporter 5/4/18
Anthony G. BRYANT, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, et al.

No. 18-9246

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
```

```

----

Updated October 10, 2014
<PAGE>

Exhibit 11

                               G&L Realty Corp.
                       Computation of Per Share Earnings
                         Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
                                March 31, 2000
                     (In thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     For the Three Month
                                                                   Periods Ended March 31,
                                                                  ------------------------
                                                                    2000             1999
                                                                  -------          -------
<S>                                                               <C>              <C>
Net (loss) income                                                 $  (250)         $ 1,651

Less: Preferred dividends
   10.25% Series A Cumulative Preferred                              (952)            (958)
    9.8% Series B Cumulative Preferred                               (841)            (845)
                                                                  --------         --------
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders                $(2,043)         $  (152)
                                                                  ========         ========
Options outstanding                                                   251              214
                                                                  ========         ========
Weighted average exercise price                                   $ 11.31          $ 14.49
                                                                  ========         ========
Proceeds upon exercise of options                                 $ 2,833          $ 3,094
                                                                  ========         ========
Treasury stock shares                                                 249              197
                                                                  ========         ========
Common share equivalents                                                2               18
Average shares outstanding                                          2,512            3,976
                                                                  --------         --------
Total common and common share equivalents outstanding               2,514            3,994
                                                                  ========         ========
Per share earnings data:
-----------------------
Basic                                                             $ (0.81)         $ (0.04)
                                                                  ========         ========
Fully diluted                                                     $ (0.81)         $ (0.04)
                                                                  ========         ========
</TABLE>
Kevin SHEPPARD, Petitioner, v. LOUISIANA.

No. 18-9693.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 27, 2020

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit for further consideration in light of *Ramos* v. *Louisiana* , 590 U.S. --- (2020). Justice Alito, concurring in the decision to grant, vacate, and remand: In this and in all other case in which the Court grants, vacates, and remands in light of *Ramos* v. *Louisiana* , I concur in the judgment on the understanding that the Court is not deciding or expressing a view on whether the question was properly raised below but is instead leaving that question to be decided on remand.
Glenn N. ALTSCHULD, Jr., Petitioner, v. Andrew M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security.

No. 19-838

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Kirby GARDNER, Petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-9119

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Alvin WEEKLY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9576

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1171 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1171

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 9, 2013

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend title 40, United States Code, to improve veterans service 
       organizations access to Federal surplus personal property.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Formerly Owned Resources for 
Veterans to Express Thanks for Service Act of 2013'' or the ``FOR VETS 
Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. VETERANS ACCESS TO FEDERAL EXCESS AND SURPLUS PERSONAL 
              PROPERTY.

    Section 549(c)(3) of title 40, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``or'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (B)--
                    (A) in clause (viii), by adding ``or'' at the end; 
                and
                    (B) by striking clause (x); and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) for purposes of providing services to 
                veterans (as defined in section 101 of title 38), to an 
                organization whose--
                            ``(i) membership comprises substantially 
                        veterans; and
                            ``(ii) representatives are recognized by 
                        the Secretary of Veterans Affairs under section 
                        5902 of title 38.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 8, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
IN RE Marquise WHITE, Petitioner.

No. 19-8102.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
10f-3 REPORT

                 SALOMON BROTHERS BALANCED FUND

            April 1, 2001 through June 30, 2001

       	Trade                                	 % of
Issuer  Date     Selling Dealer   Amount  Price Issue(1)

NTL Comm 5/9/01  Morgan Stanley  $250,000 100.00 0.05


(1) Represents purchases by all affiliated funds; may not exceed
25% of the offering.





                       10f-3 REPORT

              SALOMON BROTHERS SMALL CAP FUND

            April 1, 2001 through June 30, 2001

       	Trade                                	 % of
Issuer  Date     Selling Dealer   Amount  Price Issue(1)

Aquila  4/23/01  Merrill Lynch   $33,600  $24.00 0.04A
 Energy Corp

Instinet 5/17/01 Goldman Sachs   $8,700   $14.50 0.01B

Willis  6/11/01  Montgomery,     $71,550  $13.50 0.03C
 Group 		  Keefe Bruyette

Trizetto 6/13/01 Bear Stearns    $425,500 $9.25  1.17D
 Group

FMC      6/13/01 Merrill Lynch   $26,000  $20.00 1.10E
 Tech


(1) Represents purchases by all affiliated funds; may not exceed
25% of the offering.


A-A total of 6,400 shares was purchased by funds in the Salomon
Brothers complex for an aggregate purchase price of $153,600.

B-A total of 2,900 shares was purchased by funds in the Salomon
Brothers complex for an aggregate purchase price of $42,050.

C-A total of 5,500 shares was purchased by funds in the Salomon
Brothers complex for an aggregate purchase price of $74,250.

D-A total of 49,000 shares was purchased by funds in the Salomon
Brothers complex for an aggregate purchase price of $453,250.

E-A total of 6,100 shares was purchased by funds in the Salomon
Brothers complex for an aggregate purchase price of $122,000.
Aceshunn BROWN, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 18-9327

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Frank R. MONTERO, Petitioner v. TULSA AIRPORT IMPROVEMENTS TRUST

No. 19-5939

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 12, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.