alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Adam SCOTT, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6841

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Stephen L. BUSH, Petitioner v. David W. GRAY, Warden, et al.

No. 19-6462

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 10.6



EXHIBIT 10.6





AMENDMENT NO. 2

TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


            This Amendment No. 2 (this  “Amendment’) dated as of January 1, 2004, is made by and between Vanguard Health Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and
Keith B. Pitts (the “Executive”).


            WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive executed a certain Employment  Agreement  dated as of September 1, 1999, as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated as of May 31, 2001 ( as so
amended, the “EA”),  to secure the services of the Executive as its Vice Chairman; and


            WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive wish the Executive’s base salary set forth in Section 6(a) of the EA to be increased to $605,000, effective as of January 1, 2004.


            NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants herein contained, the Company and the Executive hereby agree that the EA is amended as follows:


            1.         Defined Terms.  Except for those terms defined above, the definitions of capitalized terms used in this Amendment are as provided in
the EA.


            2.         Amendment to Section 6(a).  Section 6(a) of the EA entitled “Base Salary” is hereby  deleted and replaced with
the following new Section 6(a):





                        “(a).  Base Salary.  The Executive’s base salary hereunder, from July 1, 2001 to December 31,
2003, shall be $550,000 per year, payable semi-monthly. Effective  January 1, 2004, the Executive’s base salary hereunder shall be $605,000 per year, payable semi-monthly. The Board shall review such base salary at least annually and make such adjustment
from time to time as it may deem advisable, but the base salary shall not at any time be reduced from the base salary in effect from time to time.”


            3.         Ratification.  All other provisions of the EA remain unchanged and are hereby ratified by the Company and the Executive.








- 2 -





            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by  its duly authorized officer and the Executive has executed this Amendment, each as of the day and year first
set forth above.



                                                                                   
Vanguard Health Systems, Inc.



                                                                                   
By:       /s/ Charles N. Martin, Jr.                     


                                                                                               
Charles N. Martin, Jr.

                                                                                               
Chairman of the Board and

                                                                                               
Chief Executive Officer



                                                                                   
Executive:






                                                                                   
/s/ Keith B.
Pitts                                              


                                                                                   
Keith B. Pitts
Melissa PFEIFFER, Petitioner v. MASSACHUSETTS

No. 19-5893

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 12, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts denied.
Regina LEWIS, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5556

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
| 1.     | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and, |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
| 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                       |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |

| By:    | /s/    | KEVIN KREISLER                |   |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |   | KEVIN KREISLER                |   |   |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer       |   |   |
| Date:  |   | May 15, 2012                  |   |   |
|   |   |                          |   |   |
| By:    | /s/    | EDWARD CARROLL                |   |   |
|   |   | EDWARD CARROLL                |   |   |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer & |   |   |
|   |   | Chief Accounting Officer      |   |   |
| Date:  |   | May 15, 2012                  |   |   |
|   |   |                          |   |   |
Chixapkaid Donald Michael PAVEL, Petitioner v. UNIVERSITY OF OREGON, et al.

No. 19-467

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Kevin Michael-Dorman BELTOWSKI, Petitioner, v. Shawn BREWER, Warden.

No. 19-5432

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Daniel M. Gottlieb, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of G&L Realty Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|Date: May 15, 2006                        
|                                          
|/s/ Daniel M. Gottlieb                    
|Daniel M. Gottlieb Chief Executive
Officer
January 18, 1999 

Bon. a. woodra LAughlIn 

aounty Attorney 

Aliae, Texam 

Daar Mr. Laughllnr 

OpInIon HO. O-109 

Flat Fee* of Jwtloes of Peaoe 

Your requeet for an opinion on the question: 

718 a SustIae of th&?Paaoe entitled to 1)0$ 

for saoh altation and does the orI&ml oount' 

a8 a oIkt10n and doem the mpg oount aa 01~3~ 

has been reaeited by this o?flae. 

detall the 

Artlole 3955, RerIwd Clvll Statutes, prorldes In 

ieoa to whloh a Juatlos 1s entitled in 01~11 oases. 

'The Iem O? SO# 1s allowed for each oltation and 

ooverm the oO8t of makIng a oopy for servloe on the defendent.* Portor ~8~ Bumet, 99 SW 79 and Hallman vae Campbell, 

07 Tax. M. 

In via of the forogolng authorities, you are reapeotfully adwlmed that It 18 the opinion of the writer that 

tho JuatIoe aS the Peaae Im entitled to SO@ for e&oh oltmtlon, 

Borrver, thim amotmt 001mra the oort of makIng oapy of uld 

oltatloa 3or aervioo ofl ths defendant and that the Justloe 

of the Peaao $6 not allowad to oharge for the original and oopy 

eaoh but IB allousd only 001 ior both the oopy and orIgI~l. 

1-b 

Trusting that tha foregoing answers hour Inquiry, 

very truly your8 

ATTORREY GEmAL OFTJSUS 

By-we 

Aaslotant 

AWrAW 

APPROVED;
CERTIFICATE
                              
      The  undersigned, Controller of SMITH BARNEY
INVESTMENT FUNDS INC. (the "Fund"), hereby certifies that
the Fund has received  full payment, in  accordance  with
the provisions of its Prospectus, for 81,171,062 shares of
common stock,  par  value $0.001 per share, the sales  of
which are reported in the Fund's Rule 24f-2 Notice covering
the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996 and that the facts
otherwise stated in such Notice are true.


                                   Thomas M. Reynolds
                                   Controller

Dated:         February 27, 1997
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q REPORTOFREDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC.PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(CHAPTER 63, TITLE 18 U.S.C. SS.SS. 1350(a) AND (b))**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350(a) and (b)), each of theundersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2006 of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc.(the ‘‘Company’’) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 2,2006

| /s/ WILLIAM  P. BRICK                        |   |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|
| William P. Brick, *Chief  Executive Officer* |   |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63,Title 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350(a) and (b)), is not a part of the Form 10-Qto which it refers and is, to the extent permitted by law, provided by theabove signatory to the extent of his knowledge.

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by ReddyIce Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

----
# C_2018428EN.01000101.xml

| 27.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 428/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 428/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8994 — Microsoft/GitHub)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 428/01)

On 19 October 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8994. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8994. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Charles JORDAN, Petitioner v. John H. MAGILL, et al.

No. 19-6396

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Victor J. BLACK, Petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-9645

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Darren C. Dunckel, certify that:





(1)           I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Atomic Paintball Inc., (Registrant).





(2)           Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;





(3)           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





(4) The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





(b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c) disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an quarterly report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





(5)           The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information ; and





(b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.








Dated: June 30, 2014








By:
/s/ Darren C. DunckelDarren C. DunckelChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of BC Partners Lending Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended  December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jason Roos, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 14, 2022

 

|                         |
|-------------------------|
| /s/ Jason Roos          |
| Jason Roos              |
| Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
# C_2017255EN.01000701.xml

| 5.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/7

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/1418, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1417 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(2017/C 255/09)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons and entities that appear in the Annex to Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/1418 (1), and in the Annex to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1417 (2) concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.

1

2

The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons and entities that appear in the abovementioned Annexes should be included in the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP (3) and in Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (4) concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. The grounds for designations of those persons appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

3

4

The attention of the persons and entities concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons and entities concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the abovementioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 203 I, 4.8.2017, p. 5.

1

(2)  OJ L 203 I, 4.8.2017, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 16.

3

(4)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.

4

---