Abatement Order filed June 15, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00162-CR

____________

SHANEQUA TERRY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 228th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1288605

A B A T E M E N T O R D E R

Appellant is represented by appointed counsel, Franklin Gordon Bynum. On 

May 14, 2012, time to file appellant=s brief expired without a brief and no motion for 

extension of time was filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). Counsel and the trial court 

were notified on May 15, 2012, that no brief had been received. No response from 

appellant has been received.

Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b) (a copy of which is attached) the judge of the 

228th District Court shall (1) immediately conduct a hearing, at which appellant, 
2

appellant=s counsel, and state=s counsel shall participate, either in person or by video 

teleconference, to determine (a) whether appellant desires to prosecute his appeal; (b) 

whether appellant is indigent; (c) if not indigent, whether appellant has abandoned the 

appeal or whether appellant has failed to make necessary arrangements for filing a brief; 

(d) the reason for the failure to file a brief; (e) if appellant desires to continue the appeal, a 

date certain when appellant=s brief will be filed; and (2) prepare a record, in the form of a 

reporter=s record, of the hearing. If appellant is indigent, the judge shall take such 

measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation of counsel, which may 

include the appointment of new counsel. The judge shall see that a record of the hearing is 

made, shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and shall order the trial clerk to 

forward a transcribed record of the hearing, a videotape or compact disc, if any, containing 

a recording of the video teleconference, and a supplemental clerk=s record containing the 

findings and conclusions. Those records shall be filed with the clerk of this court on or 

before July 16, 2011.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court=s active 

docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court=s active docket when the trial court=s 

findings and recommendations are filed in this Court. The Court will also consider an 

appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the Court may reinstate 

the appeal on its own motion. It is the responsibility of any party seeking reinstatement to 

request a hearing date from the trial court and to schedule a hearing in compliance with this 

Court=s order. If the parties do not request a hearing, the court coordinator of the trial 

court shall set a hearing date and notify the parties of such date.

PER CURIAM
3

RULE 38. REQUISITES OF BRIEFS

Tex. R. App. P. 38.8. Failure of Appellant to File Brief. 

(b) Criminal Cases.

(1) Effect. An appellant=s failure to timely file a brief does not authorize 

either dismissal of the appeal or, except as provided in (4), consideration of the appeal 

without briefs.

(2) Notice. If the appellant=s brief is not timely filed, the appellate clerk 

must notify counsel for the parties and the trial court of that fact. If the appellate court 

does not receive a satisfactory response within ten days, the court must order the trial court 

to immediately conduct a hearing to determine whether the appellant desires to prosecute 

his appeal, whether the appellant is indigent, or, if not indigent, whether retained counsel 

has abandoned the appeal, and to make appropriate findings and recommendations.

(3) Hearing. In accordance with (2), the trial court must conduct any 

necessary hearings, make appropriate findings and recommendations, and have a record of 

the proceedings prepared, which recordCincluding any order and findingsCmust be sent to 

the appellate court.

(4) Appellate Court Action. Based on the trial court=s record, the appellate 

court may act appropriately to ensure that the appellant=s rights are protected, including 

initiating contempt proceedings against appellant=s counsel. If the trial court has found 

that the appellant no longer desires to prosecute the appeal, or that the appellant is not 

indigent but has not made the necessary arrangements for filing a brief, the appellate court 

may consider the appeal without briefs, as justice may require.