alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

1 105 F.3d 972 (5th Cir. 1997).

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-30097 Summary Calendar

EVARISTUS MACKEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus WINN CORRECTIONAL CENTER ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 93-CV-965

- - - - - - - - - - July 22, 1997 Before WISDOM, JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Prisoner-appellant, Evaristus Mackey, Louisiana inmate #317335, filed a notice of appeal in this § 1983 action before the effective date of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA).
In Strickland v. Rankin County Correctional facility , 1 this court held that “prisoners whose appeals were pending on the effective date of the PLRA must refile to this court in conformity with theNo. 96-30097 - 2 -

2 Id. at 974.

3 Id. at 976.

4 See Fifth Circuit Rule 42.3. amended statute before we consider their appeals on the merits”. 2 The financial affidavits filed by Mackey in the district court do not comply with the requirements for seeking in forma pauperis (IFP) status under the PLRA. Mackey has filed no documents in this court in support of his economic eligibility to proceed IFP. Mackey has a choice: he may refile this appeal in accordance with the PLRA, or he may drop the appeal. We will not consider Mackey’s appeal “filed” for the purposes of § 1915(b), as amended, unless he refiles. 3 Mackey has 30 days from the date of this order to comply with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This appeal is held in abeyance until Mackey complies herewith, or until the expiration of 30 days, whichever comes first. If Mackey does not comply within the 30 days, the clerk of this court is to dismiss the appeal for lack of prosecution. 4
Theresa ORTLOFF, Petitioner, v. Dave TRIMMER, et al.

No. 19-653

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Fl  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

# ** **

# ** **

# **ANNUALSTATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made to that certainPooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2017, by and amongMorgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank,  NationalAssociation, as Servicer,  LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer,  Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as CertificateAdministrator, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as  Trustee and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor with respect toCommercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2017-HR2 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement. 

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of theAgreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial MortgageServices do hereby certify that: 

 

1.            A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period fromDecember 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”),  andof its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and  

 

2.           To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master  Servicer,has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all materialrespects throughout the Reporting Period. 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersignedhas executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2018. 

                                                                                           

/s/ Daniel Bober 

DanielBober 

Executive Vice President                                      

| Wells Fargo Bank 

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  

 

 

(logo) Together we’ll gofar |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000797480
<NAME> SMITH BARNEY SECTOR SERIES
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER>006
   <NAME>SMITH BARNEY GLOBAL MEDIA & TELECOM FUND

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              2 Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 OCT-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                      OCT-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>              9,331,128
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>             8,749,205
<RECEIVABLES>                        161,294
<ASSETS-OTHER>                             0
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                     439
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     8,910,938
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>              78,699
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                    0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                  0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                   78,699
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                            0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>           9,373,669
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                220,895
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                      0
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                  0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                (3,724)
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>              (26,774)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                   0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>            (581,976)
<NET-ASSETS>                       8,761,195
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                     11,419
<INTEREST-INCOME>                     13,350
<OTHER-INCOME>                             0
<EXPENSES-NET>                        28,493
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>               (3,724)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>             (26,774)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>           (581,976)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>               (612,474)
<EQUALIZATION>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                  0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                   0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                      0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>            9,538,770
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>         (165,101)
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                        0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>             8,761,195
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                    0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                  0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                    0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                 0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                 10,434
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                      101,047
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>               2,062,232
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                  11.40
<PER-SHARE-NII>                        (0.01)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                 0.00
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                    0.00
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>               0.00
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                    0.00
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                    10.47
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                         2.19
[AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING]                     0
[AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE]                       0



</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, William Lis, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q/A of Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

Date: August 6, 2015

 

|   |   | /s/ William Lis         |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   | William Lis             |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer |
Carey ACKIES, aka Boyd, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6602

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 16, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
INTEL CORPORATION, et al., Petitioners v. CONTINENTAL CIRCUITS LLC

No. 19-571

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Amadou SOWE, Petitioner v. PALL CORPORATION

No. 19-478

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1059 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1059

     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Acid Orange 116.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2013

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Acid Orange 116.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACID ORANGE 116.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.03.65 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Acid Orange 116) is amended 
by striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/
31/2016''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






| |                                                                                                                                                                    
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                                  
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Registrant.



| |     |                     
| | --- | --------------------
| | By: | /s/ Richard P. Brown

| |                                            
| | -------------------------------------------
| |                                            
| | Richard P. Brown                           
| | Chief Executive Officer of                 
| | Atlantic Coast Entertainment Holdings, Inc.



25
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION




In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PROLOR Biotech, Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PROLOR Biotech, Inc.




/s/ Steve SchaefferSteve SchaefferPrincipal Financial OfficerPROLOR Biotech, Inc.May 10, 2011





The certification set forth above is being furnished as an Exhibit solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes—Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document of PROLOR Biotech, Inc. or the certifying officers.
Benitez Auguarius MOODY, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6753

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
TN CLEAN WATER NETWORK, et al. v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY.

No. 18-1307 (R46-025).

Supreme Court of the United States

Sept. 23, 2019.

The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46.2 of the Rules of this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1198 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1198

  To provide for American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the Northern 
 Mariana Islands to be treated as States for certain criminal justice 
                               programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 14, 2013

Mr. Sablan (for himself and Mr. Faleomavaega) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the Northern 
 Mariana Islands to be treated as States for certain criminal justice 
                               programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TREATMENT AS A STATE FOR AMERICAN SAMOA AND THE CNMI.

    Section 901(a)(2) of Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 
1968 (42 U.S.C. 3791(a)(2)) is amended by striking ``Islands:'' and all 
that follows through the period and inserting ``Islands;''.
                                 <all>
```
----

|   | (1) |   | the 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  |
|--------|-----|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) |   | the information contained in the 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.         |
|--------|-----|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                          |   |                          |   |         |
|-------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|--------------|
| Date: November 12, 2010       |   | /s/ Carl Kukkonen             |   |         |
|                          |   | Carl Kukkonen            |   |         |
|                     |   | Chief Executive Officer  |   |         |
|                          |   |                          |   |         |
| Date: November 12, 2010  |   | /s/ Stephen J. Muzi           |   |    |
|                          |   | Stephen J. Muzi          |   |         |
|                          |   | Chief Financial Officer  |   |         |
**Exhibit 35.2**

 

 

**Servicer Compliance Statement of Deere Credit Services, Inc.**

 

I, Cory J. Reed, President of Deere Credit Services, Inc., state:

 

A review of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s activities for the period from February 28, 2018 (the date of issuance of the John Deere Owner Trust 2017 transaction subject to the requirements of Regulation AB) through October 28, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”) and of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 28, 2018 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables, Inc. and John Deere Owner Trust 2018 has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, Deere Credit Services, Inc. has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

 

 
| Date: January 11,   2019 | * * | Deere Credit   Services, Inc. |
|-------------------------------|----------|------------------------------------|
|                          |     |                               |
|                          |     |                               |
| * *                      | * * | * *                           |
|                          | By:      | */s/   Cory J. Reed*               |
|                          |     | Cory J. Reed                       |
|                          |     | President                          |

 

----
# r--6--6f

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21 - 0588 JADA KU, Plaint iff and Appellant, v. MONTANA HUMAN RIGHTS BUREAU, Defendant and Appellee. ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT
This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parti es having failed to j oint ly and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c), IT IS ORDERED THAT **J. David Slovak,** whose name appears next on the list of attorneys desi

ring appo int me nt a s med iators fo r Money J ud gments appeals which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appo int ed to co nduct th e mediat io n process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED th at th e time peri ods set fo rth in M.R.App.P., 7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appoint me nt . A true copy

of this order is being mailed to counsel of record f or the parti es, or to th e parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof. DATED thi s December 15, 2021.

Bowen Greenwood , Cl erk o f th e Supreme Court c: Jada Ku, Michele L. Peterson - Cook, J. David Slovak 12/15/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0588
William D. DUNNE, Petitioner v. G.J. BISSETT, Warden

No. 19-5127

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1228 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1228

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 27, 2014

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 123 South 9<SUP>th</SUP> Street in De Pere, Wisconsin, as the 
           ``Corporal Justin D. Ross Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CORPORAL JUSTIN D. ROSS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 123 South 9<SUP>th</SUP> Street in De Pere, Wisconsin, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Corporal Justin D. Ross Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Corporal 
Justin D. Ross Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 26, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Arun Chandra, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of SumTotal Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SumTotal Systems, Inc.



/s/ ARUN CHANDRAArun Chandra Chief Executive Officer Date: November 5, 2008


I, Neil J. Laird, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of SumTotal Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SumTotal Systems, Inc.



/s/ NEIL J. LAIRDNeil J. Laird Chief Financial Officer Date: November 5, 2008
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Michael J. Galloway, Appellant

No. 06-13-00157-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the Criminal District Court 4 

of Dallas County of Dallas County, Texas 

(Tr. Ct. No. F-1054301-K). Opinion 

delivered by Justice Carter, Chief Justice 

Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the 

judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment to reflect a plea of 

not true and a finding that appellant violated only conditions H, K, R and U. As modified, the 

judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

We note that the appellant, Michael J. Galloway, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MAY 22, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Earnest Lee LANGSTON, Petitioner, v. MISSOURI BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE.

No. 19-6032

Supreme Court of the United States.

Nov. 25, 2019

*563Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Missouri, Western District denied.
Yannier ARIAS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6638

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Christine SAWICKY, Petitioner v. AMC NETWORKS INC.

No. 19-5206

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 12, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.