alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[ARTICLE] 6
[CIK] 0000764624
[NAME] PREMIUM TOTAL RETURN - CLASS B
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   YEAR
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1999
[PERIOD-END]                               DEC-31-1999
[INVESTMENTS-AT-COST]                    2,249,828,328
[INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE]                   2,545,540,829
[RECEIVABLES]                              202,999,800
[ASSETS-OTHER]                                   7,138
[OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS]                                 0
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                           2,748,547,767
[PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES]                    38,935,160
[SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT]                              0
[OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES]                  164,716,707
[TOTAL-LIABILITIES]                        203,651,867
[SENIOR-EQUITY]                                      0
[PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON]                 2,090,115,757
[SHARES-COMMON-STOCK]                       95,246,888
[SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR]                      146,240,260
[ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT]                    7,790,038
[OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII]                               0
[ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS]                    150,069,581
[OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS]                             0
[ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC]                   269,920,524
[NET-ASSETS]                             2,544,895,900
[DIVIDEND-INCOME]                           52,405,887
[INTEREST-INCOME]                           69,371,534
[OTHER-INCOME]                                       0
[EXPENSES-NET]                              49,312,417
[NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME]                     72,465,004
[REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT]                   742,214,274
[APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT]                (693,844,806)
[NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS]                      121,032,472
[EQUALIZATION]                                       0
[DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME]                   43,443,768
[DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS]                   351,754,950
[DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER]                                0
[NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD]                      3,352,189
[NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED]                 71,868,845
[SHARES-REINVESTED]                         17,523,284
[NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS]                 (1,672,467,200)
[ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR]                      3,257,921
[ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR]                   73,920,269
[OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR]                              0
[OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR]                           0
[GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES]                       24,858,896
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                   0
[GROSS-EXPENSE]                             49,312,417
[AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS]                     2,350,587,605
[PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN]                            21.26
[PER-SHARE-NII]                                   0.41
[PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC]                           0.52
[PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND]                              0.39
[PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS]                         3.86
[RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL]                              0.00
[PER-SHARE-NAV-END]                              17.94
[EXPENSE-RATIO]                                   1.63
</TABLE>
# C_2018105EN.01000401.xml

| 20.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 105/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 105/4

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2018/C 105/04)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 8.2.2018 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 8.2.2018-31.12.2018 |
| Member State | All Member States except Germany, Spain, France, Poland, Portugal and the United Kingdom |
| Stock or Group of stocks | COD/1/2B. |
| Species | Cod (Gadus morhua) |
| Zone | 1 and 2b |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 03/TQ120 |

Date and time of closure

8.2.2018

Duration

8.2.2018-31.12.2018

Member State

All Member States except Germany, Spain, France, Poland, Portugal and the United Kingdom

Stock or Group of stocks

COD/1/2B.

Species

Cod (Gadus morhua)

Gadus morhua

Zone

1 and 2b

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

03/TQ120

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1

1

---
James LYLE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5671

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Corey MORRIS, Petitioner v. Steven JOHNSON, Administrator, New Jersey State Prison, et al.

No. 19-6454

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed January 11, 2019 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01095-CV 

IN THE INTEREST OF L.S., A CHILD 

On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court 

Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 401-51075-2013 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Bridges, Brown, and Whitehill 

Opinion by Justice Bridges 

Before the Court is appellant’s January 7, 2019 motion to dismiss. We grant the motion. 

We dismiss this appeal. 

181095F.P05 

 

/David L. Bridges/ 

DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE 
 –2– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

IN THE INTEREST OF L.S., A CHILD 

No. 05-18-01095-CV 

 On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District 

Court, Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 401-51075-2013. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges, 

Justices Brown and Whitehill participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. 

 We ORDERED that appellee Christina Turner Cole recover her costs, if any, of this 

appeal from Merle Eugene Schwalen. 

Judgment entered January 11, 2019
John Lee BARRON, Petitioner, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 19-7772.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-09-11T04:10:39Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-09-11T04:10:40Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-09-11T04:10:40Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="12638">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="1">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-09-11T04:10:39Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<div class="ocr">a / 0 6321 —_ -

Withdraw
and not ©

Yeksuc dk -

</div>

</div>
</body></html>
```

```

----

Updated May 9, 2014
# C_2018103EN.01000101.xml

| 19.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8816 — Goldman Sachs/Centerbridge/Robyg)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 103/01)

On 12 March 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8816. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8816. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Giam NGUYEN, Anna Bagoumian, and Donovan Simmons, Petitioners v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6375

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```

```

----

Updated January 6, 2014
UMB BANK, N.A., et al., Petitioners, v. LANDMARK TOWERS ASSOCIATION, INC.

No. 19-241

Supreme Court of the United States.

Nov. 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Colorado denied.
# Official Journal C 220A/2 Se

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 220A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 472 September 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 220A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 472 September 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Notices |
| | European Defence Agency |
| 2004/C 220A/1 | Notice of vacancies | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Notices

European Defence Agency

2004/C 220A/1

Notice of vacancies

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, et al., Petitioners v. BOOKING.COM B.V.

No. 19-46

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 8, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit granted.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JEFFREY GLENN HESTON,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

GB CAPITAL HOLDINGS, LLC, a Limited Liability Corporation,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 18

- 55125

D.C. No. 3:16

- cv

- 00912

- WQH

AGS

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California William Q. Hayes, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 15, 2018 **

Before: FARRIS, BYBEE, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Jeffrey Glenn Heston appeals pro se from the district court’s January 5, 2018

post

- judgment order denying relief from its order granting defendant’s motion to

compel arbitration and dismissing Heston’s action. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C . § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. Sch. Dist. No. 1J,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# F ILED

AUG 21 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 18

- 55125

Multnomah Cty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc. , 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993). We

affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Heston’s motion

for relief from jud gment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) because

Heston failed to set forth any basis for relief. See id. at 1263 (setting forth grounds

for relief under Rule 60 (b) )

.

We do not consider the district court’s order granting defendant’s motion to

compel arbitratio n and dismissing the action, or the December 15, 2016 order

denying Heston’ s motion for relief

, because the notice of appeal is untimely as to

those orders. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) (4)(A) ( a motion under Rule 60(b) extends

the time to file an appeal if the motion is filed no later than 28 days after judgment

is entered) ; Hamer v. Neighborhood Hous. Servs. , 138 S. Ct. 13, 17

- 18 (2017) (a

time limit not prescribed by Congress is a mandatory claim

- processing rule and if

properly in voked, mandatory claim

- processing rules must be enforced); Demaree

v. Pederson , 887 F.3d 870, 876 (9th Cir. 2018) (Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4) is a

mandatory claim

- processing rule under Hamer ).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Earth Biofuels, Inc.  (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for theperiod ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tommy Johnson, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify that:

 

1.             The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Tommy Johnson       |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |
| Tommy Johnson           |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                    |   |
| November 22, 2005  |   |
|                         |        |  |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Mark WHITEHEAD, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5961

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Independent Auditors' Consent




To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of the
Smith Barney Managed Municipals Fund Inc.:
We consent to the incorporation by reference, in this
Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information, of
our report dated April 13, 2000, on the statement of
assets and liabilities for the Smith Barney Managed
Municipals Fund Inc. as of February 29, 2000, and the
related statement of operations for the year then
ended, the statements of changes in net assets for
each of the years in the two-year period then ended
and the financial highlights for each of the years in
the five-year period then ended. These financial
statements and financial highlights and our report
thereon are included in the Annual Report of the Fund
as filed on Form N-30D.
We also consent to the references to our firm under
the headings "Financial Highlights" in the Prospectus
and "Auditors" in the Statement of Additional
Information.



K
PMG
LLP
New York, New York
August 16, 2000
Page
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

BOBBY MELLARD

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 352

[ May 23, 2019 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Edward Harold

Merrigan , Judge; L.T. Case No. 08

- 12247 CF10B

.

Bobby Mellard, Crawfordville, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY

, C ONNER and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
MARCUS H., Petitioner v. CONNECTICUT

No. 19-6080

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Connecticut denied.
James Kenneth GANZER, Jr., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5339

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EX-32.2
      5
      d49324exv32w2.htm CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
  
     **Exhibit 32.2**
 **CERTIFICATION
      OF PERIODIC REPORT**
 I,
      Darren L. Miles, Chief Financial Officer of Earth Biofuels, Inc. (the
“Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my
      knowledge:
 (1) the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the nine months
      ended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
 (2) the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:
      November 20, 2007
 /s/
                Darren L. MilesDarren
                L. MilesChief
                Financial Officer
 A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 97-6311 KEVIN JEROME FUELL, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CR-93-138-R, CA-96-1043-R) Submitted: July 30, 1998 Decided: August 19, 1998 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL Joseph Samuel Massie, III, MORRISSEY, HERSHNER & JACOBS, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Gurney Wingate Grant, II,OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia; David S. Kris, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________ OPINION PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). Appellant's conviction b ecame final in 1994. On D ecember 27, 1996, Appellant filed a § 2255 motion. The district court deniedrelief because Appellant filed his motion outside the one-year limitation period imposed by § 2255. Pursuant to our r ecent decision in Brown v. Angelone , ___ F.3d ___, Nos. 96-7173, 96-7208, 1998 WL 389030 (4th Cir. July 14, 1998), Appellant had until April 23, 1997, in which to file a timely motion. Accordingly, because Appellant filed his § 2255 motion before April 23, 1997, we grant a certificate of appealability, vacate the district court's order, and remand this case for further proceedings. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. VACATED AND REMANDED 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-29-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          16,916
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    339,977
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,387,853
<PP&E>                                      42,275,973
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              46,433,133
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,942,077
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        81,498
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,361,944
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                46,433,133
<SALES>                                     47,982,414
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            48,381,329
<CGS>                                       18,206,743
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               45,529,308
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             749,707
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,133,407
<INCOME-TAX>                                   810,481
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,322,926
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>