alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1021 

To provide that there shall be no net increase in the acres of certain Federal 

land under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management, the 

National Park Service, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 

or the Forest Service unless the Federal budget is balanced for the 

year in which the land would be purchased. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 6, 2013 

Mr. STIVERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide that there shall be no net increase in the acres 

of certain Federal land under the jurisdiction of the 

Bureau of Land Management, the National Park Service, 

the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, or the Forest Service unless the Federal budget is balanced for 

the year in which the land would be purchased. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1021 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Land Acquisition to 

3 cut National Debt Act’’ or the ‘‘LAND Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR LAND ACQUISI5 TION. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior may 

7 not use Federal funds to purchase land that would result 

8 in a net increase of land acreage that would be under the 

9 jurisdiction of the National Park Service, the United 

10 States Fish and Wildlife Service, or the Bureau of Land 

11 Management unless the Federal budget is balanced for the 

12 year in which the land would be purchased. 

13 (b) DUCK STAMP FUNDS.—Subsection (a) shall not 

14 apply to land purchased with funds made available 

15 through the sale of Federal Migratory Bird Hunting and 

16 Conservation Stamps. 

17 (c) EASEMENTS.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to 

18 easements acquired by the Secretary of the Interior to fa19 cilitate management of Federal lands. 

20 SEC. 3. NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM LAND ACQUISITION. 

21 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Agriculture may 

22 not use Federal funds to purchase land that would result 

23 in a net increase of land acreage included in the National 

24 Forest System unless the Federal budget is balanced for 

25 the year in which the land would be purchased. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1021 IH

1 (b) EASEMENTS.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to 

2 easements acquired by the Secretary of Agriculture to fa3 cilitate management of Federal lands. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the amended quarterly report of STAT Software, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the three months ended
March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas P. Condie, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Richard B. Vincent, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Douglas P. Condie

Douglas P. Condie

Chief Executive Officer

May 2, 2005





/s/ Richard B. Vincent

Richard B. Vincent

Chief Financial Officer

May 2, 2005
| 1. The Report is in full compliance with reporting requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Corporation. |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                          | REBORNNE (USA), INC. |                                            |
|-------------------------------|----------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                          |                 |                                            |   |
| Date:  February 22, 2010 | By:                  | /s/ Dairy Global                                |   |
|                          |                 | Dairy Global                                    |   |
|                          |                 | President,                                      |   |
|                          |                 | Chief Executive Officer,Chief Financial Officer |   |
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-82,220-01

EX PARTE ALBERTO BENAVIDEZ, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 20090D00811 IN THE 41st DISTRICT COURT

FROM EL PASO COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated

assault with a deadly weapon and sentenced to two years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his

conviction.

Applicant contends, inter alia, that his plea was involuntary because the plea agreement

cannot be followed. 

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. In these circumstances,
2

additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order

counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim that his plea was involuntary. The trial court may use any

means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court

may rely on its personal recollection. Id.

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant

pled guilty pursuant to an agreement that this sentence would run concurrently with a federal

sentence. And, if so, whether the Applicant’s sentence in this case is running concurrently with that

federal sentence. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law

that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus

relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: October 22, 2014

Do not publish
Charles Ray HOOPER, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7985.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1005 

To deauthorize appropriation of funds, and to rescind unobligated appropriations, to carry out the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 6, 2013 

Mr. GRAVES of Georgia (for himself, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. DUNCAN of 

South Carolina, and Mr. COLLINS of Georgia) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and 

in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, Education and the 

Workforce, the Judiciary, Natural Resources, and House Administration, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To deauthorize appropriation of funds, and to rescind unobligated appropriations, to carry out the Patient Protection 

and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Defund Obamacare 

5 Act’’. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1005 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEAUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS TO 

2 CARRY OUT PPACA AND HCERA. 

3 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no funds 

4 are authorized to be appropriated to carry out the provi5 sions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

6 (Public Law 111–148), the Health Care and Education 

7 Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 111–152), and 

8 any amendment made by either such Act. 

9 SEC. 3. RESCISSION OF UNOBLIGATED APPROPRIATIONS 

10 UNDER PPACA AND HCERA. 

11 Of the funds made available under any provision of 

12 the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public 

13 Law 111–148), the Health Care and Education Reconcili14 ation Act of 2010 (Public Law 111–152), and any amend15 ment made by either such Act, the unobligated balance 

16 is rescinded. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Dennis GORDON, Petitioner v. Jeff PREMO, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary.

No. 18-9697

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6094

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

GERALD FELTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (5:93-cr-00123-F-1)

Submitted: July 28, 2016 Decided: August 3, 2016

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gerald Felton, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Gerald Felton appeals the district court’s order denying 

his motion to reconsider the district court’s denial of his 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion to reduce his sentence based 

on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. Because the 

district court lacked jurisdiction to consider Felton’s motion 

for reconsideration, we affirm the denial of relief. See United 

States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 234 (4th Cir. 2010) (holding 

that district court lacks authority to grant motion to 

reconsider ruling on § 3582(c)(2) motion). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BCTC V Assignor Corp. (the "registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|                |  |                            
|--------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:           |  |                            
|August 14, 2008 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|                |  |                            
|                |  | Marc N. Teal               
|                |  | Principal Financial Officer
|                |  |                            
|                |  |                            

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
February 27, 1997
Smith Barney Series Fund
388 Greenwich Street
New York, New York 10013

                   Re:  Rule 24f-2 Notice
                              
Gentlemen:

    In connection with the filing by Smith Barney Series
Fund, a Massachusetts business trust (the "Fund"), of a
Notice (the "Notice"), pursuant to Rule 24f-2 under the
Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Act"), for
the Fund's fiscal year ended December 31, 1996, the
undersigned hereby provides the legal opinion required by
that Rule.

     In accordance with Rule 24f-2, the Fund has registered
an indefinite number of shares of common stock, $0.001 par
value, under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"1933 Act"). The purpose of the Notice is to make definite
the registration of 7,581,897 shares of the Fund (the
"Shares") sold in reliance upon the Rule during the fiscal
year ended December 31, 1996.

     The undersigned is Associate General Counsel of Smith
Barney Mutual Funds Management Inc., the Fund's
administrator, and in such capacity, from time to time and
for certain purposes, acts as counsel to the Fund. She has
examined copies of the Fund's Master Trust Agreement, its By-
Laws, resolutions adopted by its Board of Trustees, and such
other records and documents as have been deemed necessary
for purposes of this opinion.  Furthermore, she has examined
a Certificate of the Controller of the Fund to the effect
that the Fund received the cash consideration for each of
the Shares in accordance with the aforementioned
organizational documents and resolutions.

     On the basis of the foregoing, and assuming all of the
Shares were sold in accordance with the terms of the Fund's
Prospectus in effect at the time of sale, she is of the
opinion that the Shares have been duly authorized and
validly issued and are fully paid and non-assessable.  This
opinion is for the limited purposes expressed above and
should not be deemed to be an expression of opinion as to
compliance with the 1933 Act, the 1940 Act or applicable
State "blue sky" laws in connection with the sales of the
Shares.


                                        Very truly yours,


                                        Caren Cunningham
                                        Associate General
                                        Counsel
                                        of Smith Barney
Mutual Funds
Management Inc.
FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, Petitioner v. AURELIUS INVESTMENT, LLC, et al.

No. 18-1334

Supreme Court of the United States.

September 11, 2019

Upon consideration of the August 29, 2019 motion for divided argument, a total of 80 minutes is allotted for consolidated oral argument on both questions presented, and the time is divided as follows: 20 minutes to the Financial Oversight and Management Board, 20 minutes to the Solicitor General, 30 minutes to Aurelius Investment, LLC, et al., and 10 minutes to UTIER.
# Official Journal C 262I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 262I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 645 July 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 262I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 645 July 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2021/C 262 I/01 | Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2021/C 262 I/01

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

IV Notices

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

| 5.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 262/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 262/1

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2021/C 262 I/01)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

| Date and time of closure | 3.6.2021 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 3.6.2021 - 31.12.2021 |
| Member State | France |
| Stock or Group of stocks | ANF/8C3411 |
| Species | Anglerfish (Lophiidae) |
| Zone | 8c, 9 and 10; Union waters of CECAF 34.1.1 |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | --- |
| Reference number | 08/TQ92 |

Date and time of closure

3.6.2021

Duration

3.6.2021 - 31.12.2021

Member State

France

Stock or Group of stocks

ANF/8C3411

Species

Anglerfish (Lophiidae)

Zone

8c, 9 and 10; Union waters of CECAF 34.1.1

Type(s) of fishing vessels

---

Reference number

08/TQ92

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

---
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-82,220-01
EX P ARTE ALBE RTO BE NAVIDEZ , Appli cant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 20090D00811 IN THE 41st DIST RICT COURT

F ROM EL P ASO COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisions of Ar t i cl e 1 1
. 07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim
. Ap p . 1 9 6 7). Applicant was convicted of ag g ravated
assa ult with a deadly wea pon and sentenc ed to two y ear s’ imprisonment. He did not appea l his conviction. Applicant contends, inter a l i a , t hat his plea was involuntary beca use the plea ag ree ment cannot be followed. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief
. In these circ umstances,2

additional fac ts are neede d. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W .2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the tria l court is the appr opriate f orum for f

indings of f

act. The trial court sha ll order counsel to respond to A

pplicant’s claim that his ple a was involuntary
. The trial court may use any
means set out in T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d) . In the appr opriate c ase, the trial court may rely on its personal re collection. Id
. I f the trial c ourt elec ts to hold a hear ing, it sha ll de termine whe ther Applica nt is indi g ent. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall ap p o i nt an attorney to repre sent Applicant at the hear ing. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. The trial court shall make findings of fac t and conclusions of l aw as t o wh ether Applicant pled g uilt y pursuant to an ag ree ment that this sentenc e would run concur rently with a fede ral sentenc e. And, if so, whether the Applicant’s sentenc e in this case is running concur rently with that fede ral sente nce. T he trial c ourt shall also make a ny other finding s of fac t a

nd conclusions of law that it deems rele vant and ap p ro priate to the dispositi on of Applicant’s claim for habea s corpus relief
. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 day s of this order
. A sup p l em en t al t ranscript containing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be for war ded to this Court within 120 day s of t he date of t his order. Any extensions of ti me shall be obtained f

rom this Court. Filed: Oc tober 22, 2014 Do not publish