alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, Agriculture (USDA).

# ACTION:

Notice; withdrawal.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Kootenai National Forest is withdrawing its draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (DSEIS) for the 2019 Montanore Mine Project. The Montanore Mine Project Notice of Intent was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on December 28, 2017 (82 FR 61533) and the NOA was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on June 21, 2019 (84 FR 29201).                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Questions concerning this notice should be directed to Craig Towery at                         *craig.towery@usda.gov*                         or 406-283-7657.                    

                        Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf                               ( print page 36451)                            and hard of hearing (TDD) may call the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339, 24 hours a day, every day of the year, including holidays.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Hecla Mining Company has withdrawn from consideration the current Plan of Operations for the Montanore Project which eliminates the need for the current draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement.

Dated: June 13, 2022.

Deborah Hollen,

Acting Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest System.

[FR Doc. 2022-13089 Filed 6-16-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3411-15-P
CONCERT INVESTMENT SERIES

SUPPLEMENT DATED JUNE 2, 2000
TO
STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION DATED FEBRUARY 28, 2000

________________________

	Effective June 5, 2000, the Board of Trustees of the Fund
has approved a Distribution Agreement with PFS Distributors Inc.,
replacing the Distribution Agreement with CFBDS, Inc.




FD 0
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 02/05/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       44,369
COMMITMENTS
   6,491    2,798    2,521   23,874   28,028   32,886   33,347   11,483   11,022

CHANGES FROM 01/29/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        106)
    -433      708      100      928     -871      595      -63     -489      169

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    14.6      6.3      5.7     53.8     63.2     74.1     75.2     25.9     24.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       54)
      10        5        7       35       25       49       36
```

----

Updated February 8, 2013
# C_2018090EN.01000102.xml

| 9.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 90/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8796 — Crown/Signode)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 90/02)

On 5 March 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8796. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8796. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
[Graphic Omitted]
                                                                 family of funds


                                             January 8, 2004

Via Telecopier (978)-388-3940
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ventures National Incorporated
d/b/a Titan General Holdings, Inc.
2 Industrial Way
Amesbury, MA 01913
Attention: Mr. Glashow

                                    Re:  WAIVER LETTER
                                         -------------
Dear Mr. Glashow:

         Reference is hereby made to that certain Security Agreement dated
November 20, 2003 by and between Ventures National Incorporated d/b/a Titan
General Holdings, Inc. a Utah corporation, Inc. (the "Company") and Laurus
Master Fund, Ltd. ("Laurus") (the "Security Agreement"). Capitalized terms used
but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed them in the Security
Agreement. Laurus is hereby notifying you of its decision to exercise the
discretion granted to it pursuant to Section 2 (ii) of the Security Agreement to
make a Revolving Credit Advance to the Company in the amount of $300,000 on the
date hereof (the "Advance"), which such amount would otherwise exceed eighty
five percent (85%) of the Company's Eligible Accounts on the date hereof. In
addition, Laurus made an Overadvance to the Company on December 9, 2003 in the
aggregate principal amount of $142,745 (the "Initial Overadvance"). As of the
date hereof accrued and unpaid interest on the Initial Overadvance is $23.75.

         Although each of the Initial Overadvance and the Advance would
constitute Overadvance under the Security Agreement, for a period of four months
from the date hereof (the "Period"), Laurus hereby waives compliance with
Sections 3 of the Security Agreement, but solely as such provision relates to
the immediate repayment requirement for Overadvances. Laurus further agrees that
for solely for such Period neither the Initial Advance nor the Advance shall be
deemed an Overadvance and shall not trigger an Event of Default under Section
18(a) of the Security Agreement. No Event of Default has occurred under the
Security Agreement or the Ancillary Agreements and other terms and provisions of
the Security Agreement and the Ancillary Agreements remain in full force and
effect.

                                                     LAURUS MASTER FUND, LTD.


                                                     By:   /s/ DAVID GRIN
                                                        ---------------------
                                                           David Grin


         Agreed and accepted on the date hereof


         VENTURES NATIONAL INCORPORATED
         D/B/A TITAN GENERAL HOLDINGS, INC.

         By: /s/ ANDREW GLASHOW
            -------------------------------
            Name: Andrew Glashow
            Title: President
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**     I, Darren L. Miles, Chief Financial Officer of Earth Biofuels, Inc. (the “Company”), certify,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to thebest of my knowledge:     (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the six months ended June30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Date: August 20, 2007                                    /s/ Darren L. Miles   Darren L. Miles   Chief Financial Officer        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-18-1997
<CASH>                                         599,214
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  228,209
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    229,373
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,063,280
<PP&E>                                      11,957,594
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,583,543
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,928,484
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,986
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,418,790
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,583,543
<SALES>                                     11,135,992
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,135,992
<CGS>                                        4,170,498
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,640,827
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               813,417
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              48,250
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                633,498
<INCOME-TAX>                                   190,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            443,498
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   443,498
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Alimera Sciences, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    [paragraph deleted in accordance with SEC release no. 34-47986]c.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 b.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: May 9, 2011
    /s/ C. Daniel MyersC. Daniel MyersChief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer)
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DEMING ZENG,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney

General,

Respondent. No. 13

- 73504

Agency No. A089

- 782

- 013

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 26, 2017 **

Before: PAEZ, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Deming Zeng, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ ( “BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of

removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUL 7 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 13

- 73504

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substan tial evidence the

agency’s factual findings, Silaya v. Mukasey , 524 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th Cir. 2008)

.

W e deny in part and grant in part the petition for review, and we remand

.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s denial of Zeng’s CAT claim

because Zeng failed to establish it is more likely than not he would be tortured by

or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to China. See id.

at 1073.

T he BIA found Zeng ’s asylum claim failed because he did not establish that

a political op inion was or would be at least “one central reason” for his

mistreatment by Chinese authorities . The BIA further found that because Zeng

failed to e stablish eligibility for asylum, he did not meet the higher standard of

proof for withholding of removal

.

As to asylum, s ubstantial evidence supports t he BIA’s determination

. See

Dinu v. Ashcroft , 372 F.3d 1041, 1043

- 45 (9th Cir. 2004) (concluding that heavy

handed tactics used by police during an investigation for legitimate purposes was

not persecution on account of a protected ground).

As to withholding of removal, the BIA did not have the b enefit of this

court’s decision in Barajas

- Romero v. Lynch , 846 F.3d 351, 356

- 60 (9th Cir. 2017)

when it issued its order

. Thus, we grant the p etition for review and remand Zeng’s

withholding of removal claim to the BIA to determine the impact of this decision.3 13

- 73504

See INS v. Ventura , 537 U.S. 12, 16

- 18 (2002) (per curiam).

Each party shall bear its own costs for this petition for review.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; GRANTED in part;

REMANDED

.
**Exhibit 32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Physicians Formula Holdings, Inc.
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007,
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Ingrid
      Jackel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350
      and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
      document.




Date:
      November 12, 2007




By:
            /s/
                Ingrid JackelName:
            Ingrid
                JackelTitle:
            Chief
                Executive Officer







A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      required by Section 906, has been provided to Physicians Formula
      Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Physicians Formula
      Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
      its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atomic  Paintball,  Inc. on Form 10-Q
for the period  ended  September  30,  2008,  as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David J. Cutler, Chief
Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: November 12, 2008



By:      /s/ David J. Cutler
         ----------------------------------
         David J. Cutler
         Chief Executive Officer, principal financial officer
No. 6:24-cv-00011

Barry Patrick Emmett,

Plaintiff,

v.

Leslie Wooten et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER 

Plaintiff Barry Patrick Emmett, an inmate confined in the 

Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) and proceeding 

pro se, filed this civil-rights action. This case was referred to 

United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love. 

On January 11, 2024, the magistrate judge issued a report 

(Doc. 5) recommending that plaintiff’s motion for a temporary 

restraining order (Doc. 4) be denied. Because plaintiff 

accumulated three strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and failed to 

establish imminent danger of serious physical injury, the 

magistrate judge also recommended that the court deny plaintiff 

leave to proceed without prepayment under § 1915(g) and to 

dismiss this action unless—within fifteen (15) days—plaintiff 

pays the full filing fee of $405.00. 

A copy of this report was sent to plaintiff at his address, with 

an acknowledgment card. The docket reflects that plaintiff 

received a copy of the report on January 18, 2024. Doc. 6. 

However, to date, plaintiff neither filed objections to the report 

nor otherwise responded to the contents of the report or his status 

as a barred litigant. 

When there have been no timely objections to a magistrate 

judge’s report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for 

clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 

1420 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc). Having reviewed the magistrate 

judge’s report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, 

Case 6:24-cv-00011-JCB-JDL Document 24 Filed 04/04/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 166
- 2 -

the court accepts its findings and recommendation. Plaintiff’s 

motion for a temporary restraining order (Doc. 4) is denied. 

Plaintiff’s lawsuit is dismissed with prejudice as to the refiling of 

another in forma pauperis lawsuit raising the same claims, but 

without prejudice as to the refiling of this lawsuit upon payment 

of the full $405 filing fee within fifteen days from the date of final 

judgment. All pending motions are denied as moot.

So ordered by the court on April 4, 2024.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:24-cv-00011-JCB-JDL Document 24 Filed 04/04/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 167
Charlie Russell MARTIN, Petitioner, v. ARIZONA.

No. 18-9400

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One denied.
Kevin HENDERSON, Petitioner v. Dan BOTTOM, Warden.

No. 19-6207

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Star FORTES, Petitioner v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES, et al.

No. 19-6541

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, First District denied.