alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Sandra Smith Brown, independent * From the 385th District Court

executrix of the Estate of R.J. Smith, Jr., of Midland County,

deceased, Trial Court No. CV56870

.

Vs

. No. 11

- 2 1

- 00 019

- C V * March 1 1 , 20 2 1

William Charles Underwood

, * Per Curiam Memorand um Opinion

Jan Ann Underwood Pinborough, and (P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Rosanne Underwood Gerrard, Trotter , J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assig nment )

( Will iams , J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that t he appeal

should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, in accordance with this

court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The costs incurred by reason of this

appeal are taxed against Sandra Smith Brown, independent executrix of the Estate

of R.J. Smith, Jr., deceased.
James Kerr SCHLOSSER, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-530

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
# Official Journal C 195/21 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 195 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6421 May 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 195

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6421 May 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 195/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 195/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Ramelus D. BRADLEY, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6640

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 16, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
# C_2018210EN.01000401.xml

| 18.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 210/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 210/4

---

Special Report No 15/2018

‘Strengthening the capacity of the internal security forces in Niger and Mali: only limited and slow progress’

(2018/C 210/05)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 15/2018 ‘Strengthening the capacity of the internal security forces in Niger and Mali: only limited and slow progress’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel; NCMRR Early Career Research Award.                    

*Date:*                         July 7-8, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute  of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, 6710B Rockledge Drive, Room 2137C, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Assisted Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Kimberly L. Houston, M.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute  of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, 6710B Rockledge Drive, Room 2137C, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 827-4902,                         *kimberly.houston@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 8, 2022.

David W. Freeman,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-12798 Filed 6-13-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Presidential Documents

35853 

Federal Register 

Vol. 87, No. 114 

Tuesday, June 14, 2022 

Title 3— 

The President 

Memorandum of June 8, 2022 

Delegation of Authority Under the European Energy Security 

and Diversification Act of 2019 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, including section 301 of title 3, 

United States Code, I hereby delegate to the Secretary of State the functions 

and authorities vested in the President by section 2004(e)(1)(C) of the European Energy Security and Diversification Act of 2019 (22 U.S.C. 9563(e)(1)(C)) 

(the ‘‘Act’’). The delegation in this memorandum shall apply to any provision 

of any future public law that is the same or substantially the same as 

the provision referenced in this memorandum. Any reference in this memorandum to the Act shall be deemed to be a reference to such Act as amended 

from time to time. 

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal 

Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, June 8, 2022 

[FR Doc. 2022–12892 

Filed 6–13–22; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with FR_PREZDOC0BIDEN.EPS</GPH>
Donald Sheman BUSH, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7800.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1169 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to transfer to the Secretary of the 

Navy certain Federal land in Churchill County, Nevada. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 14, 2013 

Mr. AMODEI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to transfer to the 

Secretary of the Navy certain Federal land in Churchill 

County, Nevada. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Naval Air Station 

5 Fallon Housing and Safety Development Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TRANSFER OF DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

7 LAND. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

9 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1169 IH

1 shall transfer to the Secretary of the Navy, without con2 sideration, the Federal land described in subsection (b). 

3 (b) DESCRIPTION OF FEDERAL LAND.—The Federal 

4 land referred to in subsection (a) is the parcel of approxi5 mately 400 acres of land under the jurisdiction of the Sec6 retary of the Interior that— 

7 (1) is adjacent to Naval Air Station Fallon in 

8 Churchill County, Nevada; and 

9 (2) was withdrawn under Public Land Order 

10 6834 (NV–943–4214–10; N–37875). 

11 (c) MANAGEMENT.—On transfer of the Federal land 

12 described under subsection (b) to the Secretary of the 

13 Navy, the Secretary of the Navy shall have full jurisdic14 tion, custody, and control of the Federal land. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

NAKIA L. DERRICK §

§

v. § Case No. 2:23-CV-0498-RWS-RSP

§

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD 

COMPANY, ET AL.

§

§

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the Court is Union Pacific Railroad Company’s Motion to Dismiss Based on Statute 

of Limitations. (Dkt. No. 3.) Previously, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file a response to Union 

Pacific’s Motion by May 15, 2024. (Dkt. No. 7.) Plaintiff has not filed a response. The motion 

points out that Plaintiff’s complaint was filed in state court on September 19, 2023, which is 

confirmed in the record. See Dkt. No. 2. The accident sued upon occurred on June 28, 2019. The 

statute of limitations for negligence and gross negligence claims is two years. TEX. CIV. PRAC. 

& REM. CODE ANN. § 16.003. When the untimeliness of the action is evident on the face of the 

pleadings, dismissal is appropriate by means of a Rule 12 motion. Jones v. Alcoa, Inc., 339 F.3d 

359, 366 (5th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, the Court recommends that Union Pacific’s Motion be 

GRANTED and the claims against Union Pacific Railroad and Power Secure, Inc. (alleged to be 

the employer of the Plaintiff) be dismissed with prejudice.

The Court’s previous order also ordered Plaintiff to complete his efforts to serve Defendant 

Power Secure, Inc. and file proper evidence of completed service of the summons and complaint

upon Power Secure, Inc. pursuant to Rule 4(m) by May 15, 2024. (Dkt. No. 7.) Plaintiff has taken 

no action in this case since the Court’s prior Order. Accordingly, as an alternative basis, this case 

Case 2:23-cv-00498-RWS-RSP Document 9 Filed 06/04/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 59
2

should be dismissed without prejudice as to Power Secure, Inc. for failure to prosecute pursuant to 

Rule 4(m).

A party’s failure to file written objections to the findings, conclusions, and 

recommendations contained in this report within 14 days bars that party from de novo review by 

the district judge of those findings, conclusions, and recommendations and, except on grounds of 

plain error, from appellate review of unobjected-to factual findings and legal conclusions accepted 

and adopted by the district court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); see Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. 

Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

.

____________________________________

ROY S. PAYNE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SIGNED this 3rd day of January, 2012. SIGNED this 4th day of June, 2024.

Case 2:23-cv-00498-RWS-RSP Document 9 Filed 06/04/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 60
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.52    
    


LETTER
AGREEMENT 


August
29, 2003 


Special
Devices, Incorporated

14370 White Sage Road

Moorpark, CA 93021

Attn: James Reeder 


Re:    Credit Facility Provided by Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc. to Special Devices Incorporated


Ladies
and Gentlemen: 


This
letter agreement (this "Letter Agreement") is entered into by and between Special Devices, Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc. (fka
Foothill Capital Corporation, the "Lender"). Reference is made to that certain Loan and Security Agreement dated as of June 27, 2001, between the Company and Lender, as amended by those certain
letter agreements dated as of July 17, 2002, October 23, 2002, March 28, 2003, June 13, June 24, 2003, and July 29, 2003 (as amended, the "Loan Agreement").
Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined in this Letter Agreement shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Loan Agreement. The term "Loan Documents" as defined in the Loan Agreement is
hereby amended and supplemented to include this Letter Agreement. 


Borrower
and Lender have executed a Consent and Amendment No. 1 to Loan Documents, dated as of April 16, 2003 ("Amendment No. 1"), which has not become effective because the
conditions precedent to its effectiveness have not been satisfied. Borrower is required to cause Amendment No. 1 to become effective by August 31, 2003. At Borrower's request, Lender
hereby agrees to allow Amendment No. 1 to become effective no later than September 30, 2003. Borrower shall cause Amendment No. 1 to become effective no later than
September 30, 2003. 


Except
as specifically set forth above and as set forth in other amendments and agreements in writing between the parties in accordance with Section 15.1 of the Loan Agreement, the respective
rights and obligations of the parties under the Loan Agreement shall remain unchanged. 



This
Letter Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument. The terms and
conditions of the Loan Agreement are hereby incorporated by reference into this Letter Agreement. 


This
Letter Agreement shall become effective upon the Company returning a executed copy of this Letter Agreement to Lender. 


Please
indicate your agreement by signing in the space provided below. 



	Very truly yours,	 	 
	

WELLS FARGO FOOTHILL, INC.	
 	

 
	

/s/ JOHN NOCITA
	
 	

 
	
AGREED AND ACKNOWLEDGED:	
 	

 
	

SPECIAL DEVICES, INCORPORATED	
 	

 
	

By:	
 	

/s/ JAMES E. REEDER
	
 	

 
	Name:	 	JAMES E. REEDER
	 	 
	Title:	 	VICE PRESIDENT FINANCE
	 	 
	Date:	 	SEPTEMBER 3, 2003
	 	 











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.52
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000918904
<NAME> THE SELMER COMPANY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                             474
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    82714
<ALLOWANCES>                                      7969
<INVENTORY>                                      82730
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                167506
<PP&E>                                           76502
<DEPRECIATION>                                   17969
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  283144
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            43482
<BONDS>                                         133495
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       74528
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    283144
<SALES>                                         206010
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                206010
<CGS>                                           138590
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    34549
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  4473
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   525
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                9805
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  18068
<INCOME-TAX>                                      8310
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               9758
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      9758
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  9758.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  9758.00
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-11134

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JANET LENELL EASTER,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:00-CR-241-1-A

--------------------

April 11, 2002

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Janet Lenell Easter appeals her conviction following entry

of a guilty plea to a charge of possession with intent to

distribute more than fifty grams of cocaine base. Easter

contends that the district court participated in the plea

negotiations in violation of FED. R. CRIM. P. 11(e)(1).

Rule 11, FED. R. CRIM. P., requires the district court to

participate actively in discussions after a plea agreement has

been disclosed. United States v. Crowell, 60 F.3d 199, 203 (5th

Cir. 1995). However, FED. R. CRIM. P. 11(e)(1) absolutely
No. 01-11134

-2-

prohibits a district court from participating in or interfering

with plea negotiations. Id. Although the district court may

state reasons for accepting or rejecting a plea agreement, it may

not suggest plea agreements that might be acceptable. Id.

The district court’s post guilty plea consideration of the

potential sentence Easter faced under the plea agreement as

compared to the punishment that Easter would have faced for her

conduct as a whole did not constitute participation in plea

negotiations in violation of FED. R. CRIM. P. 11(e)(1). See

Crowell, 60 F.3d at 203-04. The judgment of the district court

is AFFIRMED.
Amendment Number Five



 Exhibit 10.38(x) 
  
 AMENDMENT NUMBER FIVE 
 TO THE 
 GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION 
 1995 SHAREHOLDER VALUE INCENTIVE PLAN 
 (As Amended and Restated Effective
December 16, 1997) 
  
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 5.1 of the
Georgia-Pacific 1995 Shareholder Value Incentive Plan, as amended and restated as of December 16, 1997 (the “Plan”), the Board has the right to amend the Plan, with the approval of the Shareholders of the Corporation where necessary or
advisable; and 
  
 WHEREAS, at its January 31, 2003 meeting, the
Board delegated to the Committee the authority to approve amendments to the Plan as necessary or appropriate to effectuate a program to offer employees an opportunity to exchange outstanding stock options under various option plans of the
Corporation and its subsidiaries for a lesser number of restricted shares to be granted under the Georgia-Pacific Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan, for the purpose of motivating and retaining employees; 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Committee hereby amends the Plan as follows, subject to
and effective as of the date of shareholder approval: 
  
 1.
Section 5.1(d) of the Plan is amended to read as follows: 
  
 Notwithstanding the foregoing, no amendment may, without the approval of the Shareholders of the Corporation . . . : 
  
 “(d) Reduce, directly or indirectly, the exercise price of an outstanding Option Grant, whether through direct amendment to the exercise price,
through cancellation and replacement of the Option Grant, or otherwise (modification of the Option Price pursuant to Section 3.7 will not be considered amendments for purposes of this Section). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Corporation may
effect a one-time exchange offer to be commenced in the discretion of the Corporation no sooner than May 6, 2003 and no later than the 2004 annual meeting of the Corporation’s Shareholders, upon the terms and conditions described in the
Corporation’s proxy statement for the 2003 annual meeting of the Corporation’s Shareholders and in a Schedule TO to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about May 6, 2003, as the same may be amended (the “2003
Exchange Offer”). Upon surrender of Option Grants under the Plan pursuant to the 2003 Exchange Offer, the underlying shares shall not be available for future grants under the Plan.”
May 2, 1997 
 
 
 
Securities and Exchange Commission 
Judiciary Plaza 
450 Fifth Street, N.W. 
Washington, D.C. 20549 
 
 
ATTN.:		Office of Filings, Information and Consumer Services 
 
RE:		Smith Barney Investment Funds Inc. (the "Fund") 
 
		File No. 002-74288, Accession Number:  0000091155-97-000216 
 
Gentlemen: 
 
	Pursuant to Rule 497(j) under the Securities Act of 1933, as 
amended, please accept this letter as certification that the prospectus 
and statement of additional information of each of the Fund's do not 
differ from that contained in Post-Effective Amendment No. 44 (the 
"Amendment") to the Fund's Registration Statement on Form N-1A.  This 
Amendment was filed electronically on April 29, 1997. 
 
	Any comments on this filing should be directed to the undersigned 
at (212) 816-6393.  Please return an electronic transmittal as evidence 
of your receipt of this filing. 
 
					Very truly yours, 
 
 
 
 
					/s/ Robert A. Vegliante 
					Robert A. Vegliante 
					Deputy General Counsel
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q REPORT**

**OF**

**REDDY ICEHOLDINGS, INC.**

**PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(CHAPTER63, TITLE 18 U.S.C. SS.SS. 1350(a) AND (b))**

 

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350(a) and(b)), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March  31, 2005 of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. (the‘‘Company’’) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:  May 16, 2005

 
| /s/ WILLIAM P. BRICK                      |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|
| William P. Brick, Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350(a) and(b)), is not a part of the Form 10-Q to which it refers and is, tothe extent permitted by law, provided by the above signatory to the extent ofhis knowledge.

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906, or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signaturethat appears in typed form within the electronic version of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, has been provided to Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc.and will be retained by Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----