alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

___________________________

No. 95-30317

___________________________

TRINIDAD PUBLISHING COMPANY LIMITED,

Plaintiff-Appellant 

Cross-Appellee,

VERSUS

COASTAL CARGO ALABAMA, INC., ET AL.,

Defendants,

and

ALEXANDER & BLAKE TRADING COMPANY, INC., in personam,

Defendant-Third Party 

Plaintiff-Appellee 

Cross-Appellant,

VERSUS

PRICE & PIERCE INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Third Party 

Defendant-Appellant

Cross-Appellee.

___________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Louisiana

(93-CV-1111)

____________________________________________________

March 13, 1996

Before KING, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM*:

The district court did not err in concluding that Alexander &
2

Blake had an insurable interest in the cargo, was an additional

assured under Lloyds'policy and not subject to suit, directly or

indirectly, by the subrogated insurer. We also are persuaded that

the district court did not err in declining to award attorney's

fees to Alexander & Blake. 

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The
undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to their knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012 of Dewmar International BMC,
Inc. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.



Very truly
yours,



|/s/ Marco
    Moran     | 
|----------------------- | 
|Marco Moran             | 
|Chief Executive Officer | 
|                        | 
|August 20, 2012         | 
|                        | 
|/s/ Marco Moran         | 
|Marco Moran             | 
|Chief Financial Officer | 
|                        | 
|August 20, 2012         | 



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Dewmar
International BMC, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.6

March 17, 2003


Stephen Cooke
289 Pacific Street
Brooklyn, NY 11201

[Logo Omitted]

Dear Stephen:

I am pleased to extend an offer of employment by American Capital Access Service
Corporation to act as General Counsel of American Capital Access Holdings
Limited and its subsidiaries (ACA).

Your compensation will be as follows:

o   $250,000 per annum, payable bi-weekly in accordance with ACA's payroll
    schedule; and

o   Options for 0.40% of ACA common stock on a fully diluted basis to be vested
    over a three-year period as defined in ACA's Omnibus Incentive Compensation
    Plan (please see the attached schedule that sets forth a range of potential
    values for your options, subject to the caveat that there can be no
    assurance that any value will accrete to your options or, if valuable, when
    you may realize any such value).

o   A one time payment in the amount of $50,000 will be paid 90 days from the
    date of the commencement of your employment, contingent only on your
    continued employment on that date.

In addition, you will be eligible to receive a merit bonus award, in accordance
with ACA guidelines, based on corporate as well as individual performance,
subject to the approval of the Board of Directors. Your bonus this year will
equal 100% of your base salary and will be payable on or before March 2004.


You will report to the undersigned in his capacity as the Chief Executive
Officer.

This offer of employment is contingent upon the receipt of evidence of your
eligibility to work in the United States, as well as satisfactory results from
an ACA-arranged drug screening.

Sincerely,

/s/ Michael Satz
----------------
Michael Satz
Chief Executive Officer

Cc: Mamie Chu



Director, Human Resources

This offer expires at close of business on Tuesday, March 18, 2003. Please
indicate your acceptance of our offer by signing and returning the original copy
of this letter to my attention at your earliest convenience, retaining a copy
for your records. A copy may be faxed to my attention at the following number:
(212) 375-2322.

Accepted: /s/ Stephen Cooke       Date: 3/17/03
          -----------------             -------
          Stephen Cooke
Byron GAY, Petitioner, v. Scott DAFFENBACH, Warden, et al.

No. 19-7875.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 6, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**WRITTENSTATEMENT**

 

**OF**

 

**CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

The undersigned hereby certify that the Form 10-Q for the quarterended September 30, 2005 filed by TNS, Inc. with the Securities andExchange Commission fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the issuer.

 

 
| Dated: November 14, 2005                                    |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                             |
| /s/ John J. McDonnell, Jr.                                  |   |
| John J. McDonnell, Jr.                                      |   |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                             |   |
|                                                             |   |
| Dated: November 14, 2005                                    |   |
|                                                             |   |
| /s/ Henry H. Graham, Jr.                                    |   |
| Henry H. Graham, Jr.                                        |
| Executive Vice President, Chief Financial  Officer and Treasurer |

 

----
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018214EN.01000701.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 19.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 214/7 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.8829 — Total Produce/Dole Food Company)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 214/07)

1.

On 11 June 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018214EN.01000701-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Total Produce PLC (Republic of Ireland), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | DFC Holdings LLC (The United States). |

Total Produce PLC (‘Total Produce’) will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of DFC Holdings LLC, and indirectly in its wholly-owned subsidiary, Dole Food Company Incorporated (together referred to as ‘Dole’).

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Total Produce: Import and distribution of a wide range of fresh fruit and vegetables, including bananas and pineapples. Total Produce also operates banana ripening centres. Total Produce is active worldwide, with its geographic focus being Europe,

—   for Dole: Production, sales and distribution of fresh fruit and vegetables, including bananas and pineapples, in North America, Europe, Latin America, South Africa and Dubai, with a principal geographic focus on North America.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.8829 — Total Produce/Dole Food Company

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018214EN.01000701-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---
Christopher G. WAGUESPACK, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6676

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Alan M. LESCHYSHYN, Petitioner, v. Dineshkumar PATEL, et al.

No. 19-6514

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One denied.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1032 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand access to Coverdell 

education savings accounts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2013 

Mr. GARDNER (for himself, Mr. POLIS, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Mr. MEADOWS, Mr. 

JONES, and Mr. GIBSON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand 

access to Coverdell education savings accounts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Making College Afford5 able Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF COVERDELL EDUCATION SAVINGS 

7 ACCOUNTS. 

8 (a) INCREASE IN AGE LIMITATION OF BENEFICIARY

9 AFTER WHICH CONTRIBUTIONS TO ACCOUNT CANNOT

10 BE MADE.—Clause (ii) of section 530(b)(1)(A) of the InVerDate Mar 15 2010 03:52 Mar 09, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1032.IH H1032

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1032 IH

1 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘age 

2 18’’ and inserting ‘‘age 26’’. 

3 (b) INCREASE IN ANNUAL DOLLAR LIMITATION ON

4 CONTRIBUTIONS TO ACCOUNT.— 

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—Clause (iii) of section 

6 530(b)(1)(A) of such Code is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘$2,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$10,000’’. 

8 (2) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—Subsection (b) 

9 of section 530 of such Code is amended by adding 

10 at the end the following new paragraph: 

11 ‘‘(5) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.— 

12 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any 

13 taxable year beginning in a calendar year after 

14 2013, the dollar amount in paragraph 

15 (1)(A)(iii) shall be increased by an amount 

16 equal to— 

17 ‘‘(i) such dollar amount, multiplied by 

18 ‘‘(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment de19 termined under section 1(f)(3) for the cal20 endar year, determined by substituting 

21 ‘calendar year 2012’ for ‘calendar year 

22 1992’ in subparagraph (B) thereof. 

23 ‘‘(B) ROUNDING RULE.—If any increase 

24 determined under subparagraph (A) is not a 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1032 IH

1 multiple of $100, such amount shall be rounded 

2 to the nearest multiple of $100.’’. 

3 (c) EFFECTIVE DATES.— 

4 (1) INCREASE IN AGE LIMITATION.—The 

5 amendments made by subsection (a) shall apply to 

6 contributions made after the date of the enactment 

7 of this Act. 

8 (2) INCREASE IN ANNUAL DOLLAR LIMITATION

9 ON CONTRIBUTIONS.—The amendments made by 

10 subsection (b) shall apply to contributions made in 

11 taxable years ending after the date of the enactment 

12 of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1010 

KA 11-01836 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, SCONIERS, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PATRICK E. MCDONALD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

LEANNE LAPP, PUBLIC DEFENDER, CANANDAIGUA (CARA A. WALDMAN OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

R. MICHAEL TANTILLO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, CANANDAIGUA (JAMES B. RITTS OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (William F.

Kocher, J.), rendered July 7, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant,

upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in

the third degree (four counts). 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him

upon his plea of guilty of four counts of criminal sale of a

controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.39 [1]).

Defendant’s contention that his plea was not knowingly, voluntarily,

and intelligently entered is unpreserved for our review because he did

not move to withdraw the plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction

(see People v Davis, 99 AD3d 1228, 1229, lv denied 20 NY3d 1010). 

Defendant’s further contention that County Court erred in refusing to

suppress the identification made by a confidential informant from a

photo array is also unpreserved for our review (see People v Cruz, 89

AD3d 1464, 1465, lv denied 18 NY3d 993), and in any event that

contention is without merit.

We reject defendant’s contention that the bargained-for sentence

is unduly harsh and severe (see generally People v Santiago, 1 AD3d

957, 957, lv denied 1 NY3d 601). Defendant correctly contends,

however, that the uniform sentence and commitment sheet fails to

specify whether that sentence is to run concurrently with or

consecutively to the sentences imposed for crimes charged in a

separate superior court information (SCI), to which he also pleaded

guilty. The uniform sentence and commitment sheet therefore must be

amended in accordance with the court’s directive at sentencing, i.e.,

to reflect that the sentence pertaining to the SCI is to be served

consecutively to the sentence imposed herein (see People v Jackson, 
-2- 1010 

KA 11-01836 

108 AD3d 1079, 1081).

Entered: October 4, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 10(i)(a)

                            PENN FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK
                     SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN

                              AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE

      Effective November 1, 2003, Section 3.2(b) of the Penn Federal Savings
Bank Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the "SERP") was amended to read as
follows:

            (b) In addition to the death benefit provided in Section 3.2(a), but
      subject to, and limited by, all of the provisions of this Plan, a
      Participant's Beneficiary shall, upon the death of the Participant,
      receive a lump sum death benefit equal to $600,000 reduced by the death
      benefit paid to the Participant under the Penn Federal Savings Bank
      Supplemental Executive Death Benefit Plan. This benefit shall be paid to
      the Participant's Beneficiary as soon as practicable following the date of
      the Participant's death.

      All other provisions of the SERP are ratified and confirmed.

                                                     Penn Federal Savings Bank

                                                     By: /s/ William C. Anderson
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         William C. Anderson
                                                         Chairman of the Board
July 14, 1997
Smith Barney Arizona Municipals Fund Inc.
388 Greenwich Street
New York, New York 10013

                   Re:  Rule 24f-2 Notice
                              
Gentlemen:

    In connection with the filing by Smith Barney Arizona
Municipals Fund Inc., a Maryland corporation (the "Fund"),
of a Notice (the "Notice"), pursuant to Rule 24f-2 (the
"Rule")under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended
(the "Act"), for the Fund's fiscal year ended May 31 1997,
the undersigned hereby provides the legal opinion required
by that Rule.

     In accordance with the Rule, the Fund has registered an
indefinite number of shares of common stock, $0.001 par
value, under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"1933 Act"). The purpose of the Notice is to make definite
the registration of 629,618 shares of the Fund (the
"Shares") sold in reliance upon the Rule during the fiscal
year ended May 31, 1997.

     The undersigned is Associate General Counsel of Smith
Barney Mutual Funds Management Inc., the Fund's Investment
Adviser and Administrator, and in such capacity, from time
to time and for certain purposes, acts as counsel to the
Fund. He has examined copies of the Fund's Articles of
Incorporation, its By-Laws, resolutions adopted by its Board
of Directors, and such other records and documents as have
been deemed necessary for purposes of this opinion.
Furthermore, he has examined a Certificate of the Controller
of the Fund to the effect that the Fund received the cash
consideration for each of the Shares in accordance with the
aforementioned organizational documents and resolutions.

     On the basis of the foregoing, and assuming all of the
Shares were sold in accordance with the terms of the Fund's
Prospectus in effect at the time of sale, he is of the
opinion that the Shares have been duly authorized and
validly issued and are fully paid and non-assessable.  This
opinion is for the limited purposes expressed above and
should not be deemed to be an expression of opinion as to
compliance with the 1933 Act, the 1940 Act or applicable
State "blue sky" laws in connection with the sales of the
Shares.


                                        Very truly yours,


                                        David Barnett
                                        Associate General
                                        Counsel
                                        Smith Barney Mutual
Funds
Management Inc.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q REPORTOFREDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC.PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(CHAPTER 63, TITLE 18 U.S.C. SS.SS. 1350(a) AND (b))**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350(a) and (b)), each of theundersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2006 of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in suchReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

Date:  April 28, 2006
| /s/ STEVEN J. JANUSEK                      |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| Steven J. Janusek, Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63,Title 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350(a) and (b)), is not a part of the Form 10-Qto which it refers and is, to the extent permitted by law, provided by theabove signatory to the extent of his knowledge.

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by ReddyIce Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

----
Lettie SEXTON, EX REL. APPALACHIAN REGIONAL HEALTHCARE, INC., Petitioner v. KENTUCKY CABINET FOR HEALTH AND FAMILY SERVICES, et al.

No. 18-1446

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 21, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Kentucky denied.
Robert HENDRICKS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6907

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 11992M/PRO/SEBC/12

**Treaty on European Union - Protocol on the statute of the european system of central banks and of the European Central Bank - Chapter III: Organisation of the ESCB - Article 12: Responsabilities of the decision - making bodies***Official Journal C 191 , 29/07/1992 P. 0071*

 Article 12 

 Responsibilities of the decision-making bodies

 12.1. The Governing Council shall adopt the guidelines and take the decisions necessary to ensure the performance of the tasks entrusted to the ESCB under this Treaty and this Statute. The Governing Council shall formulate the monetary policy of the Community including, as appropriate, decisions relating to intermediate monetary objectives, key interest rates and the supply of reserves in the ESCB, and shall establish the necessary guidelines for their implementation. 

 The Executive Board shall implement monetary policy in accordance with the guidelines and decisions laid down by the Governing Council. In doing so the Executive Board shall give the necessary instructions to national central banks. In addition the Executive Board may have certain powers delegated to it where the Governing Council so decides. 

 To the extent deemed possible and appropriate and without prejudice to the provisions of this Article, the ECB shall have recourse to the national central banks to carry out operations which form part of the tasks of the ESCB. 

 12.2. The Executive Board shall have responsibility for the preparation of meetings of the Governing Council. 

 12.3. The Governing Council shall adopt Rules of Procedure which determine the internal organization of the ECB and its decision-making bodies. 

 12.4. The Governing Council shall exercise the advisory functions referred to in Article 4. 

 12.5. The Governing Council shall take the decisions referred to in Article 6.
Mark F. MCCAFFREY, Petitioner v. Michael L. CHAPMAN, et al.

No. 19-342

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.