alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Salvador Arteaga ARAGON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8106.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 6:23-cv-00546

Benito Contreras, Jr.,

Petitioner,

v.

Sheriff Larry R. Smith,

Respondent.

ORDER

Petitioner Benito Contreras, Jr., proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis, filed this habeas action while an inmate in the Smith 

County Jail. Doc. 1. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Doc. 

2. 

On February 12, 2024, the magistrate judge issued a report (Doc. 

11) recommending that this case be dismissed without prejudice due 

to the petitioner’s failure to comply with the court’s order to file a 

second amended petition. Doc. 10. A copy of the report was mailed 

to the petitioner, who did not file written objections.

The envelope containing the report was returned to the court 

stamped “return to sender” and “no longer at this address.” Doc. 

12. The publicly available records of the Smith County Jail confirm 

that the petitioner was released from jail on February 9, 2024. See

Jail Records Search Detail for Contreras, Benito, available at 

https://judicial.smith-county.com/PublicAccess/JailingDetail.aspx?JailingID=386403 (last visited May 9, 2024). It is well-settled that a plaintiff has an ongoing obligation and responsibility to 

inform the Court of his whereabouts through a current mailing address. See Martinez-Reyes v. United States, 2016 WL 8740494, at *4 

(S.D. Tex. Oct. 10, 2016). This requirement is memorialized in the 

Local Rules of the Eastern District of Texas: “A pro se litigant must 

provide the court with a physical address (i.e., a post office box is not 

Case 6:23-cv-00546-JCB-JDL Document 13 Filed 05/17/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 43
- 2 -

acceptable) and is responsible for keeping the clerk advised in writing of his or her current physical address.” Local Rule CV-11(d).

When no party objects to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass 

v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satisfied that it 

contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation. This case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with a court order. 

So ordered by the court on May 17, 2024.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cv-00546-JCB-JDL Document 13 Filed 05/17/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 44
2007 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

3-27-2007

Lauren W. v. DeFlaminis

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 05-3774

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2007 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Lauren W. v. DeFlaminis" (2007). 2007 Decisions. Paper 1375.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007/1375
PRECEDENTIAL 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

 

Nos. 05-3774, 05-4008, 05-4009

 

LAUREN W., BY AND THROUGH HER PARENTS,

JEAN AND JAMES W.; JEAN W.; JAMES W.,

ON THEIR OWN BEHALF,

Appellants in No. 05-3774

v.

JOHN A. DEFLAMINIS, DR., IN HIS INDIVIDUAL

CAPACITY; KITTY LUGAR, DR., IN HER INDIVIDUAL

CAPACITY; RADNOR TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Appellants in Nos. 05-4008 & 05-4009

 

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Civ. No. 03-cv-01526)

District Judge: Honorable Legrome D. Davis

 

Argued December 13, 2006

BEFORE: FISHER, CHAGARES and GREENBERG, Circuit Judges

 

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

 

It is hereby ordered that the opinion in this case filed March 22, 2007, is amended

as follows:
(1) In the third line of the third paragraph in footnote 11 of the slip

opinion on page 15 the word “of” should be inserted between “resolution”

and “the”;

(2) In the third line of footnote 13 on page 19 the word “deposition”

should be substituted for “disposition”;

(3) In the last line of footnote 13 on page 19 “non-moving” should

be substituted for “nonmoving”;

(4) In the first line of footnote 14 on page 19 “DeFlaminis” should

be substituted for “DeFalminis” and “Lugar” should be substituted for

“Luger.”

By the Court,

 /s/ Morton I. Greenberg 

 Circuit Judge

DATED: 27 March 2007
Exhibit 16 

 

Case 2:23-cv-00576-JRG-RSP Document 26-25 Filed 01/29/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1364
12/28/23, 5:03 PM Business Filing Details

https://mblsportal.sos.state.mn.us/Business/SearchDetails?filingGuid=7d90b399-abd4-e011-a886-001ec94ffe7f#orderselected 1

Filing History

Filing Date Filing Effective Date

04/26/1985 Original Filing - Business Corporation (Domestic)

04/26/1985 Business Corporation (Domestic) Business Name

(Business Name: Rykodisc, Inc.)

Business Record Details »

Rykodisc, Inc.

Minnesota Business Name

Business Type

Business Corporation (Domestic)

MN Statute

302A

File Number

4X-713

Home Jurisdiction

Minnesota

Filing Date

04/26/1985

Status

Active / In Good Standing

Renewal Due Date

12/31/2024

Registered Office Addre

1010 Dale St N

St Paul, MN 55117–5603

USA

Number of Shares

100,000

Registered Agent(s)

CT Corporation System Inc

Chief Executive Offic

Mark Pinkus

777 South Santa Fe Ave

Los Angeles, CA 90021

USA

Principal Executive Office Addre

777 South Santa Fe Ave

Los Angeles, CA 90021

USA

Filing History

Selectthe item(s) you would like to order: Order Selected Copies

Case 2:23-cv-00576-JRG-RSP Document 26-25 Filed 01/29/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 1365
12/28/23, 5:03 PM Business Filing Details

https://mblsportal.sos.state.mn.us/Business/SearchDetails?filingGuid=7d90b399-abd4-e011-a886-001ec94ffe7f#orderselected 2

Filing Date Filing Effective Date

02/24/1989 Registered Office and/or Agent - Business Corporati

(Domestic)

09/12/1995 Registered Office and/or Agent - Business Corporati

(Domestic)

07/29/1998 Registered Office and/or Agent - Business Corporati

(Domestic)

07/06/2005 Global Registered Office and/or Agent - Busine

Corporation (Domestic)

08/30/2007 Global Registered Office and/or Agent - Busine

Corporation (Domestic)

01/09/2008 Administrative Dissolution - Business Corporation

(Domestic)

07/08/2008 Annual Reinstatement - Business Corporation (Domestic)

03/05/2009 Registered Office and/or Agent - Business Corporati

(Domestic)

5/23/2013 Merger Survivor - Business Corporation (Domestic)

5/23/2013 Merger Survivor - Business Corporation (Domestic)

9/16/2016 Registered Office and/or Agent - Business Corporati

(Domestic)

© 2023 Office of the Minnesota Secreta

of State - Terms & Conditions

The Office of the Secretary of State is 

equal opportunity employer

 Subscribe for email updates!

Vulnerability Disclosure

Case 2:23-cv-00576-JRG-RSP Document 26-25 Filed 01/29/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 1366
# C_2018398EN.01000402.xml

| 5.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9119 — SEGRO/PSPIB/Warehouse)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 398/08)

On 25 October 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9119. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9119. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 54 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 54

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
   relating to the use of foreign law as authority in Federal courts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 24, 2013

  Mr. Culberson (for himself, Mr. Bishop of Utah, Mr. Sam Johnson of 
  Texas, Mr. Gowdy, and Mr. Mulvaney) introduced the following joint 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
   relating to the use of foreign law as authority in Federal courts.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Any legal opinion or ruling issued by any court in the 
United States, including those rulings and opinions issued by the 
Supreme Court of the United States, shall be based only on the United 
States Constitution, or on duly enacted statutes and domestic case law 
of the United States or any State and shall not be based on 
international laws, treaties, or religious laws.
    ``Section 2. Any action of a court in violation of section 1 is 
null and void.''.
                                 <all>
```
H. J. Res. 130 

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

Joint Resolution 

Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2015, and for other purposes. 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2015 (Public Law 113–164) is 

amended by striking the date specified in section 106(3) and 

inserting ‘‘December 13, 2014’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Government Accountability Office

# AGENCY:

U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO).

# ACTION:

Request for letters of nomination and resumes.

# SUMMARY:

The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 established the Physician-Focused Payment Model Technical Advisory Committee (PTAC) to provide comments and recommendations to the Secretary of Health and Human Services on physician payment models and gave the Comptroller General responsibility for appointing its members. GAO is now accepting nominations of individuals for this committee.

# DATES:

Letters of nomination and resumes should be submitted no later than July 11, 2022, to ensure adequate opportunity for review and consideration of nominees prior to appointment. Appointments will be made in October 2022.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Submit letters of nomination and resumes to                         *PTACcommittee@gao.gov.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Greg Giusto at (202) 512-8268 or                         *giustog@gao.gov*                         if you do not receive an acknowledgement within a week of submission or you need additional information. For general information, contact GAO's Office of Public Affairs at (202) 512-4800.                    

*Authority:*                         Sec. 101(e), Public Law 114-10, 129 Stat. 87, 115 (2015).                    

Gene L. Dodaro,

Comptroller General of the United States.

[FR Doc. 2022-12447 Filed 6-8-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1610-02-P
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1014 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1014

To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 
to provide that military technicians (dual status) shall be included in 
military personnel accounts for purposes of any order issued under that 
                                  Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 2013

 Mr. Palazzo introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 
to provide that military technicians (dual status) shall be included in 
military personnel accounts for purposes of any order issued under that 
                                  Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF MILITARY TECHNICIANS (DUAL STATUS).

    (a) In General.--Section 251(a)(3) of the Balanced Budget and 
Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 901(a)(3)) is amended 
by adding at the end the following new sentence: ``For purposes of this 
paragraph, military technicians (dual status) shall be included in 
military personnel accounts.''.
    (b) Application of Amendment.--The amendment made by subsection (a) 
shall apply to any order of the President to exempt military personnel 
accounts from sequestration issued under section 255(f)(1) of the 
Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 
905(f)(1)) after January 1, 2013.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2017242EN.01000201.xml

| 27.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/2

---

Decision concerning the assessment of the conditions for resolution in respect of Veneto Banca SpA

(2017/C 242/02)

On 23 June 2017, the Single Resolution Board decided not to place Veneto Banca SpA under resolution. This decision was based on the conclusion that the condition of Article 18(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 (1) was not met. The main elements of this decision are as follows:

1

| Date of adoption of the decision: | 23 June 2017 |
| --- | --- |
| Decision No: | SRB/EES/2017/11 |
| Addressee: | Banca d'Italia |
| Institution: | Veneto Banca SpA |
| Application of the write-down and conversion of capital instruments power: | No |
| Resolution action: | No |
| Fund aid: | No |

Date of adoption of the decision:

23 June 2017

Decision No:

SRB/EES/2017/11

Addressee:

Banca d'Italia

Institution:

Veneto Banca SpA

Application of the write-down and conversion of capital instruments power:

No

Resolution action:

No

Fund aid:

No

More information about this decision can be found on the SRB's official website: https://srb.europa.eu/en/content/banca-popolare-di-vicenza-veneto-banca

---

(1)  OJ L 225, 30.7.2014, p. 1.

1

---
#### In the Matter of Milford W. Childs, Doing Business as Top Of The Block, Petitioner, *v.*State Liquor Authority, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Niagara County,

February 13, 1973.

*Hart & Mack*for petitioner. *Eli Ratner*and *Joseph F. Reina*for respondent.

Roger T. Cook, J.

This proceeding is brought to annul the determination of the respondent which denied the petitioner’s application for a liquor license.

On August 17, 1972 the petitioner filed with the Orleans County Alcoholic Beverage Control Board an application for a catering establishment license for premises located in the S. A. Cook Building, Main Street, Medina, New York. The building is a commercial building with an arcade and public hallways. Its tenants include three dentists, an accountant, a law office, a children’s shop,- the Farmers Home Administration, and the Medina Bar Association.

The premises to be licensed consist of several rooms including a barroom, kitchen, dining room and ballroom, which are located on the" second floor of the building. From 1935 to 1969 the premises were used by the Benevolent Protective Order of Elks as a lodge. During that time the lodge was licensed to sell liquor and other alcoholic beverages.

The respondent denied petitioner’s application on September 29, 1972, for alleged failure to comply with subdivision 7 of section 64 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law which mandates that “No retail license for on-premises consumption *977shall be granted for any premises which shall be on the same street or avenue and within two hundred feet of a building occupied exclusively as a school, church, synagogue or other place of worship ”.

Adjacent to the S. A. Cook Building is a church known as the First United Presbyterian Church. (It may be noted that the First Presbyterian Church, in response to an inquiry from the State Liquor Authority, met in session on February 9, 1972 and passed a resolution stating it had no objection to the granting of a license to the petitioner.)

The petitioner contends the distance should be measured from the center of the church walkway at the point where it meets the public thoroughfare to the center of the second-floor door of the premises sought to be licensed. It contends this distance is 242 feet.

The respondent’s denial that the petitioner is more than 200 feet from the church is based upon its contention that the street level access door to the S. A. Cook Building’s arcade and public hallways must be used as the point of measurement rather than the second-floor door to the premises.

This court finds for the petitioner. *(Matter of Treadway-Binhamton Co.*v. *State Liq. Auth.,*35 A D 2d 222.) Although the statute should be strictly enforced, it should not be extended beyond the protection it was intended to create and be accorded an impractical and unreasonable construction (Treadway-Binghamton *Co.,*p. 227).

The determination of the respondent is hereby annulled and vacated and the respondent is directed to issue the requested license to petitioner.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 111 / Thursday, June 9, 2022 / Presidential Documents 35071 

Presidential Determination No. 2022–15 of June 6, 2022 

Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 303 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as Amended, on Solar Photovoltaic Modules and Module Components 

Memorandum for the Secretary of Energy 

Ensuring a robust, resilient, and sustainable domestic industrial base to 

meet the requirements of the clean energy economy is essential to our 

national security, a resilient energy sector, and the preservation of domestic 

critical infrastructure. Therefore, by the authority vested in me as President 

by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including 

section 303 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (the ‘‘Act’’) 

(50 U.S.C. 4533), I hereby determine, pursuant to section 303(a)(5) of the 

Act, that: 

(1) solar photovoltaic modules and module components, including ingots, 

wafers, solar glass, and cells, are industrial resources, materials, or critical 

technology items essential to the national defense; 

(2) without Presidential action under section 303 of the Act, United States 

industry cannot reasonably be expected to provide the capability for the 

needed industrial resource, material, or critical technology item in a timely 

manner; and 

(3) purchases, purchase commitments, or other action pursuant to section 

303 of the Act are the most cost effective, expedient, and practical alternative 

method for meeting the need. 

Pursuant to section 303(a)(7)(B) of the Act, I find that action to expand 

the domestic production capability for solar photovoltaic modules and module components is necessary to avert an industrial resource or critical technology item shortfall that would severely impair national defense capability. 

Therefore, I waive the requirements of section 303(a)(1)–(a)(6) of the Act 

for the purpose of expanding the domestic production capability for solar 

photovoltaic modules and module components. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with FR_PREZDOC1
35072 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 111 / Thursday, June 9, 2022 / Presidential Documents 

You are authorized and directed to publish this determination in the Federal 

Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, June 6, 2022 

[FR Doc. 2022–12583 

Filed 6–8–22; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 6450–01–P 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with FR_PREZDOC1BIDEN.EPS</GPH>