alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1

<S>                                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                         JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                 44,646
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       44,646
<PP&E>                                                 18,181
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         6,519,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  1,062,449
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                               77,852
<OTHER-SE>                                             4,903,651
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           6,519,100
<SALES>                                                40,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       40,000
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       10,183,238
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     97,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (10,143,238)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (10,143,238)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (10,143,238)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.31)



</TABLE>
Joshua George NOWLAND, Petitioner v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 19-5786

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET-WTI - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                      Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/06/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      511,969
COMMITMENTS
  81,601   39,255  108,195  304,098  349,815  493,894  497,265   18,075   14,704

CHANGES FROM 04/29/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,931)
  -4,411      946    2,960    3,906   -2,199    2,455    1,707      476    1,224

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    15.9      7.7     21.1     59.4     68.3     96.5     97.1      3.5      2.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      143)
      29       36       56       69       66      130      131
```

----

Updated May 9, 2014
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 89 

Expressing support for designation of October 28, annually, as ‘‘Honoring 

the Nation’s First Responders Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 5, 2014 

Mr. MEADOWS submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of October 28, annually, 

as ‘‘Honoring the Nation’s First Responders Day’’. 

Whereas the term first responders includes all fire, police, 

EMT, and volunteer first responder workers in the 

United States; 

Whereas there are over 25,300,000 first responders in the 

United States today, working to keep our communities 

safe; 

Whereas first responders, both professional and volunteer, deserve to be recognized for their commitment to safety, defense, and honor; and 

Whereas October 28 would be an appropriate day to establish 

as ‘‘Honoring the Nation’s First Responders Day’’: Now, 

therefore, be it 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 89 IH 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘Honoring the 

4 Nation’s First Responders Day’’; 

5 (2) honors and recognizes the contributions of 

6 volunteer firefighters, policemen, and other service 

7 men and women; and 

8 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

9 to observe ‘‘Honoring the Nation’s First Responders 

10 Day’’ with appropriate ceremonies and activities that 

11 promote awareness of the contributions of the Na12 tion’s First Responders. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Willis Shane GORDON, Petitioner, v. Sam CLINE, Warden.

No. 19-7289

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
DOE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-1522

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

*419Motion for leave to file a brief in opposition under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted. Motion for leave to file a reply brief under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6966
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JUANA SUAREZ-MILIAN, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at A lexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-91-122, CA-95-765-AM) Submitted: October 23, 1997 Decided: November 21, 1997 Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Juana Suarez-Milian, Appellant Pro Se. Gordon Dean Kromberg, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have sixty days withinwhich to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only exceptions to the appeal period are when the district court extends the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The district court entered its order on September 20, 1995; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on March 18, 1996, which is beyond the sixty-day appeal period. Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period leavesthis court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant's appeal. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 113 (Monday, June 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 35743]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12639]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Charter Renewal of Department of Defense Federal Advisory 
Committees--Board of Actuaries

AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: Charter renewal of federal advisory committee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DoD is publishing this notice to announce that it is renewing 
the charter for the Department of Defense Board of Actuaries (DoD BoA).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Freeman, Advisory Committee 
Management Officer for the Department of Defense, 703-692-5952.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The DoD BoA's charter is being renewed in 
accordance with 10 U.S.C. 183, the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(FACA) of 1972 (5 U.S.C., Appendix) and 41 CFR 102-3.50(a). The charter 
and contact information for the DoD BoA's Designated Federal Officer 
(DFO) can be found at http://www.facadatabase.gov/.
    The DoD BoA provides independent advice and recommendations on 
matters relating to the DoD Military Retirement Fund, the DoD Education 
Fund, the DoD Voluntary Separation Incentive Fund, and such other funds 
as the Secretary of Defense shall specify.
    Pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 183(b), the DoD BoA shall consist of three 
members from among qualified professional actuaries who are members of 
the Society of Actuaries. All members of the DoD BoA are appointed to 
provide advice on behalf of the Government on the basis of their best 
judgment without representing any particular point of view and in a 
manner that is free from conflict of interest. A member of the DoD BoA 
who is not an employee of the United States is entitled to receive pay 
at the daily equivalent of the annual rate of basic pay of the highest 
rate of basic pay under the General Schedule of subchapter III of 
chapter 53 of title 5, for each day the member is engaged in the 
performance of duties vested in the DoD BoA. All members are entitled 
to reimbursement for official DoD BoA-related travel and per diem.
    The public or interested organizations may submit written 
statements to the DoD BoA membership about the DoD BoA's mission and 
functions. Written statements may be submitted at any time or in 
response to the stated agenda of a planned meeting of the DoD BoA. All 
written statements shall be submitted to the DFO for the DoD BoA, and 
this individual will ensure that the written statements are provided to 
the membership for their consideration.

    Dated: June 7, 2022.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2022-12639 Filed 6-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/31/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       61,866
COMMITMENTS
  15,870   11,264    1,159   30,551   36,850   47,580   49,273   14,286   12,593

CHANGES FROM 12/24/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        843)
     -46      328       23      350      465      327      816      516       27

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    25.7     18.2      1.9     49.4     59.6     76.9     79.6     23.1     20.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       84)
      22       19       10       35       26       60       53
```

----

Updated January 6, 2014
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. 

CHRISTINA MICHELLE GOODMAN 

(2) 

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NUMBER 4:24-CR-00004-ALM

ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY

The Court referred this matter to the United States Magistrate Judge for administration 

of a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge 

conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued Findings of 

Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court 

accept Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment. 

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings. 

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea 

of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers

acceptance of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Christina 

Michelle Goodman GUILTY of Count One of the Indictment, charging a violation of Title

21 U.S.C. § 846 - Conspiracy to Distribute or Possession with the Intent to Distribute a 

Controlled Substance. 

Case 4:24-cr-00004-ALM-KPJ Document 64 Filed 07/31/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 175
Case 4:24-cr-00004-ALM-KPJ Document 64 Filed 07/31/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 176
Eduardo RODRIGUEZ-LOPEZ, Petitioner v. FLORIDA.

No. 19-5779

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District denied.
# C_2018368EN.01000101.xml

| 11.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 368/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 368/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8995 — Magna/Olsa)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 368/01)

On 28 September 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8995. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8995. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Charles C. LIU, et al., Petitioners, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.

No. 18-1501

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 1, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted.
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 116 

Congratulating the Sailors of the United States Submarine Force upon the 

completion of 4,000 ballistic missile submarine (SSBN) deterrent patrols. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 

Mr. KILMER (for himself, Mr. COURTNEY, Mr. LANGEVIN, Mr. FORBES, and 

Mr. GALLEGO) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the Sailors of the United States Submarine 

Force upon the completion of 4,000 ballistic missile submarine (SSBN) deterrent patrols. 

Whereas the Sailors of the United States Submarine Force 

recently completed the 4,000th deterrent patrol of a ballistic missile submarine (SSBN); 

Whereas this milestone is significant for the Submarine 

Force, its crews and their families, the United States 

Navy, and the entire country; 

Whereas this milestone was reached through the combined efforts and impressive achievements of all of the submariners who have participated in such patrols since the 

first patrol of USS George Washington (SSBN 598) in 

1960; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 116 IH 

Whereas, as a result of the dedication and commitment to excellence of the Sailors of the United States Submarine 

Force, ballistic missile submarines have always been 

ready and vigilant, reassuring United States allies and 

deterring anyone who might seek to do harm to the 

United States or United States allies; 

Whereas the national maritime strategy of the United States 

recognizes the critical need for strategic deterrence in today’s uncertain world; 

Whereas the true strength of the ballistic missile submarine 

lies in the extremely talented and motivated Sailors who 

have voluntarily chosen to serve in the submarine community; and 

Whereas the inherent stealth, unparalleled firepower, and 

nearly limitless endurance of the ballistic missile submarine provide a credible deterrence for any enemies that 

would seek to use force against the United States or 

United States allies: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) congratulates the Sailors of the United 

4 States Submarine Force upon the completion of 

5 4,000 ballistic missile submarine (SSBN) deterrent 

6 patrols; and 

7 (2) honors and thanks the crews of ballistic 

8 missile submarines and their devoted families for 

9 their continued dedication and sacrifice. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

RAYMOND ROGERS, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-4402

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed January 4, 2019. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas

County; Nancy Moate Ley, Judge.

Raymond Rogers, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and C. Todd Chapman,

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa,

for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, KELLY, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 37 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 37

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
   limiting the number of times Senators and Representatives may be 
                                elected.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 18, 2013

    Mr. Ribble introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
   limiting the number of times Senators and Representatives may be 
                                elected.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. No person shall be elected as a Representative more 
than three times. An election to any part of a term for which some 
other person was elected shall not count in determining the number of 
times a person is elected unless the person serves more than one year 
as a Representative pursuant to that election.
    ``Section 2. No person shall be elected or appointed as a Senator 
more than twice. An election or appointment to any part of a term for 
which some other person was elected shall not count in determining the 
number of times a person is elected or appointed unless the person 
serves more than three years as a Senator pursuant to that election or 
appointment.
    ``Section 3. Only elections or appointments which occur after the 
date of ratification of this article shall count in determining the 
number of times a person is elected or appointed.
    ``Section 4. Any reelection or reappointment of a Senator to the 
office of Senator shall not count in determining the number of times a 
person is elected or appointed if the person was a Senator on the date 
of ratification of this article and has been elected as a Senator every 
term since the date of ratification of this article. Any reelection of 
a Representative to the office of Representative shall not count in 
determining the number of times a person is elected or appointed if the 
person was a Representative on the date of ratification of this article 
and has been elected as a Representative every term since the date of 
ratification of this article.''.
                                 <all>
```
Chuck WILLIS, Petitioner, v. TOWER LOAN OF MISSISSIPPI, LLC.

No. 19-1165.

Supreme Court of the United States.

June 1, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.