alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 23

                   Consent of Independent Public Accountants

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report, dated January 17, 2002, included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's
previously filed Registration Statement File Nos. 33-79398, 33-79396, 33-94792,
33-94770, 333-28955, 333-28957, 333-58023, 333-58021, 333-83639, 333-41986,
333-38482, and 333-50100.




Boston, Massachusetts
March 28, 2002
Gabriel GALINDO-SERRANO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7112.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 6, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
SOUTH CAROLINA, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 18-1531

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
S. Res. 627 

In the Senate of the United States, 

December 20, 2012. 

Resolved, That the following Senator is designated as 

chairman of the following committee: 

COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS: Ms. Mikulski, of 

Maryland. 

Attest: 

Secretary.
Alireza VAZIRABADI, Petitioner, v. DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITAL AUTHORITY, et al.

No. 19-943.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 26, 2020

Petition for rehearing denied.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11



                                G&L Realty Corp
                       Computation of Per Share Earnings
                         Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
                                 June 30, 1998
                     (In thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        Three Months Ended                Six Months Ended
                                                             June 30,                         June 30,
                                                       --------------------             --------------------
                                                        1998          1997               1998          1997
                                                       ------        ------             ------        ------
<S>                                                    <C>           <C>                <C>           <C>
Net Income                                             $2,597        $1,282             $4,963        $2,388

Less: Preferred Dividends
 10.25% Series A Cumulative Preferred                     958           511              1,916           511
 9.8% Series B Cumulative Preferred                       845          ----              1,690          ----
                                                       ------        ------             ------        ------
Net income available to
 common shareholders                                   $  794        $  771             $1,357        $1,877
                                                       ======        ======             ======        ======

Option shares outstanding                                 234           372                234           372
Weighted average exercise price                         14.49         12.11              14.49         12.11

Proceeds upon exercise of options                      $3,391        $4,506             $3,391        $4,506
Weighted average price for period                       17.57         16.33              18.73         16.81

Treasury stock shares                                     193           276                181           268

Common equivalent shares                                   41            96                 53           104
Average shares outstanding                              4,122         4,006              4,124         4,035
                                                       ------        ------             ------        ------
Total common and common
 equivalent shares outstanding                          4,163         4,102              4,177         4,139
                                                       ======        ======             ======        ======

Per share earnings data:

 Basic                                                 $ 0.19        $ 0.19             $ 0.33        $ 0.46

 Fully diluted                                         $ 0.19        $ 0.19             $ 0.32        $ 0.46
</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.b

I, Marc N. Teal, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund V L.P.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





|August 22, 2005 | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|--------------- | ---------------------------
|                | Marc N. Teal               
|                | Principal Financial Officer
|                |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

## Filings Instituting Proceedings

*Docket Numbers:*                     RP22-975-000.                

*Applicants:*                     El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.                

*Description:*                     § 4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Agreement Update (SoCal June 2022) to be effective 6/7/2022.                

*Filed Date:*                     6/6/22.                

*Accession Number:*                     20220606-5097.                

*Comment Date:*                     5 p.m. ET 6/20/22.                

Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.

                    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system (                    *https://elibrary.ferc.gov/​idmws/​search/​fercgensearch.asp*) by querying the docket number.                

                    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying facilities filings can be found at:                     *http://www.ferc.gov/​docs-filing/​efiling/​filing-req.pdf.*                     For other information, call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                

Dated: June 7, 2022.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-12670 Filed 6-10-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)

The undersigned, as the President, Secretary and Treasurer (the
equivalent of the chief financial officer and chief executive officer) of New
Jersey Acquisition, Inc. certifies that, to the best of his knowledge and
belief, the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March
31, 2004, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of New Jersey
Acquisition, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing
certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose. The
undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing
certification except as required by law.

Dated:   May 17, 2004

/s/ Douglas G. FurthDouglas G. Furth, President,Secretary and Treasurer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

GREGORY HOWARD GROOMS §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-248 

J. BARTLETT, ET AL. §

 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Gregory Howard Grooms, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant

to Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), against J.

Bartlett, A. Rutledge, and unidentified members of the medical staff at the United States Penitentiary

in Beaumont, Texas.

The action was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 for

findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case.

Discussion

On September 28, 2023, Plaintiff was ordered to submit an amended pleading that contains

a more detailed factual explanation of his claims. (Doc. #8.) Plaintiff was given twenty days to

comply with the court order. As of this date, Plaintiff has not submitted an amended pleading in

compliance with the order.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) authorizes the district court to dismiss an action sua

sponte for failure to prosecute or to comply with a court order. Larson v. Scott, 157 F.3d 1030, 1031

(5th Cir. 1998). “The power to invoke this sanction is necessary in order to prevent undue delays

in the disposition of pending cases and to avoid congestion in the calendars of the District Courts.” 

Case 1:23-cv-00248-MJT-CLS Document 10 Filed 10/31/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:

135
Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30 (1962); Martinez v. Johnson, 104 F.3d 769, 772 (5th Cir.

1997).

By choosing not to comply with the court order, Plaintiff has failed to prosecute this case

diligently. Accordingly, this action should be dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution.

Recommendation

This action should be dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution pursuant to

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Objections

Within fourteen days after receipt of the magistrate judge’s report, any party may serve and

file written objections to the findings of facts, conclusions of law and recommendations of the

magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings of facts, conclusions of law and

recommendations contained within this report within fourteen days after service shall bar an

aggrieved party from the entitlement of de novo review by the district court of the proposed findings,

conclusions and recommendations and from appellate review of factual findings and legal

conclusions accepted by the district court except on grounds of plain error. Douglass v. United

Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1417 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R.

CIV. P. 72. 

2

.

___________________________________

Christine L Stetson

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SIGNED this the 31st day of October, 2023.

Case 1:23-cv-00248-MJT-CLS Document 10 Filed 10/31/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:

136
Jamie D. GEER, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA

No. 19-5160

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District denied.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/09/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      361,415
COMMITMENTS
 120,208  146,767   98,443  120,203   85,374  338,854  330,584   22,561   30,831

CHANGES FROM 12/02/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -12,439)
  -5,113   -7,237   -5,396     -549      257  -11,058  -12,376   -1,381      -63

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    33.3     40.6     27.2     33.3     23.6     93.8     91.5      6.2      8.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      178)
      47       76       75       39       35      136      147
```

----

Updated December 12, 2014
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 9, 2010 

p0830 

Order 

 

September 9, 2010 

140981 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140981 

 COA: 296288 

Wayne CC: 08-005042-FH 

JAMES IRELL MITCHELL, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 8, 2010 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

DAVIS, J., not participating. I recuse myself and am not participating because I 

was on the Court of Appeals panel in this case. See MCR 2.003(B).
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 44 Received in Senate (RDS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 44

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 23, 2013

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District of Columbia 
              Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF THE CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR DC SPECIAL 
              OLYMPICS LAW ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN.

    On September 27, 2013, or on such other date as the Speaker of the 
House of Representatives and the

              

 Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate may jointly 
designate, the 28th Annual District of Columbia Special Olympics Law 
Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution referred to as the ``event'') 
may be run through the Capitol Grounds to carry the Special Olympics 
torch to honor local Special Olympics athletes.

SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

    The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as may be 
necessary to carry out the event.

SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

    The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for physical 
preparations for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, in connection with the event.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 22, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
James ZAVAGLIA, Petitioner, v. BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE.

No. 19-7936.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
# C_2018060EN.01000102.xml

| 16.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8675 — CVC/Teva’s Women’s Health Business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 60/02)

On 20 December 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8675. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8675. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6966

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JUANA SUAREZ-MILIAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-91-122, CA-95-765-AM)

Submitted: October 23, 1997 Decided: November 21, 1997

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Juana Suarez-Milian, Appellant Pro Se. Gordon Dean Kromberg, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for

lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal

are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are "mandatory and

jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434

U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S.

220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have sixty days within

which to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only exceptions

to the appeal period are when the district court extends the time

to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).

The district court entered its order on September 20, 1995;

Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on March 18, 1996, which is

beyond the sixty-day appeal period. Appellant's failure to note a

timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period leaves

this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant's appeal. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

```

----

Updated January 10, 2014
```
 
 
WHEAT-HRSpring - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                          Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 09/02/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       55,507
COMMITMENTS
  16,672    8,249    1,401   26,065   34,026   44,138   43,676   11,369   11,831

CHANGES FROM 08/26/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -4,859)
     314      -23   -1,212   -3,404   -3,183   -4,302   -4,418     -557     -441

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    30.0     14.9      2.5     47.0     61.3     79.5     78.7     20.5     21.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       78)
      18       14        8       38       25       60       44
```

----

Updated September 5, 2014