alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                November 18, 2008 | By:    | /s/                David A. Gillespie                                                            |
|----------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   |   | David                A. Gillespie                                                                |
|                                   |   | President                and Chief Executive Officer(Principal                Executive Officer) |

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on April 28, 2022, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), National Fire Protection Association (“NFPA”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development activities.                

The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, NFPA has provided an updated and current list of its standards development activities, related technical committee and conformity assessment activities.

                    Information concerning NFPA regulations, technical committees, current standards, standards development and conformity assessment activities are publicly available at                     *nfpa.org*.                

                    On September 20, 2004, NFPA filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on October 21, 2004 (69 FR 61869). The last notification was filed with the Department on January 28, 2022. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on March 10, 2022 (87 FR 13755).                

Suzanne Morris,

Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2022-11514 Filed 5-27-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
# C_2019390EN.01017101.xml

| 18.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 390/171 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 390/171

---

P8_TA(2018)0108

EU-Australia Framework Agreement ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 18 April 2018 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion on behalf of the Union of the Framework Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Australia, of the other part (15467/2016 – C8-0327/2017 – 2016/0367(NLE))

(Consent)

(2019/C 390/32)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (15467/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (15467/2016),

| — | having regard to the draft Framework Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Australia, of the other part (09776/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Framework Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Australia, of the other part (09776/2016),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 37 of the Treaty on European Union, and Article 207, Article 212(1), Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), and Article 218(8), second subparagraph of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0327/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 37 of the Treaty on European Union, and Article 207, Article 212(1), Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), and Article 218(8), second subparagraph of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0327/2017),

| — | having regard to its non-legislative resolution of 18 April 2018 (1) on the draft decision, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to its non-legislative resolution of 18 April 2018 (1) on the draft decision,

| — | having regard to Rule 99(1) and (4) and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 99(1) and (4) and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (A8-0110/2018), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (A8-0110/2018),

| 1. | Gives its consent to conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Australia. |
| --- | --- |

2.

---

(1)  Texts adopted, P8_TA(2018)0109.

---
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 21

- 00088

- CR

PHILLIP LEON WORTHEY , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 76th District Court Titus County, Texas Trial Court No. CR19529

Befo re Morriss, C.J., Stevens and Carter , * JJ.

_______________________________ *Jack Carter, Justice, Retired, Sitting by Assignment2 O R D E R Phillip Leon Worthey appeals from the trial court’s judgment adjudicating him guilty of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and sentencing him to ten years’ incarceration. On appeal, Worthey challe nges the trial court’s jurisdiction to adjudicate his guilt, and the State concedes that the trial court was without jurisdiction to act. Assuming that the State’s

co ncession is based on a correct interpretation of the law, the resolution of this case cou ld lead to
the release of an improperly imprisoned man . In light of this possibility, we find it necessary to take steps to expedite the decision in this case.
Rule 2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure states, “On a party’s motion or on its
own ini tiative an appellate court may

— to expedite a decision or for other good cause

— suspend a rule’s operation in a particular case and order a different procedure . . . .” T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 2. We find that good cause exists to invoke Rule 2, which we utilize to suspend, in this particular case,
th e notice requirem ents of Rule 39.8 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See T EX

. R.
A PP

. P. 39.8. We hereby withdraw the s ubmission date of January 24, 2022. This case will be submitted to the panel of Chief Ju stice Josh Morriss, Justice Scott Stevens, and Justice Jack Carter (retired, sitting by assignment) on January 7, 2022.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT

DATE: Januar y 6 , 202 2
Derrick Dewayne DAVIS, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND LABORDE CORRECTIONAL CENTER, et al.

No. 19-7464.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 31.a

I, John P. Manning, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BCTC V Assignor Corp. (the "Assignor");
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Assignor as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The Assignor's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Assignor and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the Assignor, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the Assignor's disclosure controls and procedures  and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



1. The Assignor's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Assignor's auditors and the audit committee of the Assignor's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Assignor's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Assignor's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  March 10, 2005 | /s/ John P. Manning 
|--------------------- | --------------------
|                      | John P. Manning     
|                      | Director, President 
|                      | (Principal Executive
|                      | Officer), BCTC V    
|                      | Assignor Corp.
# C_2018001EN.01000102.xml

| 4.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 1/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 1/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8690 — TDR Capital LLP/Rossini Holding SAS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 1/02)

On 20 December 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8690. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8690. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Johnny KIRKLAND, Petitioner, v. HUNTINGTON INGALLS, INCORPORATED.

No. 19-5173

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134504 & (40) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 134504 

 COA: 273234 

Muskegon CC: 06-052984-FC

EDDIE RYAN LEWIS, a/k/a EDWARD LEWIS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the April 17, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented 

should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0830 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 10, 2007 

 Clerk
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Jeffrey J. DePolo, :

Appellant :

:

v. : No. 79 C.D. 2017

:

Board of Supervisors of Tredyffrin :

Township; and Michael C. Heaberg, :

Kristen K. Mayock, Paul Olson, :

Evelyn Richter, John P. :

DiBuonaventuro, Mark Freed, :

and Murph Wysocki, in their :

capacities as members of the :

Board of Supervisors of Tredyffrin :

Township and Tredyffin Township :

Zoning Hearing Board of Appeals; :

and Arnold Borish, Daniel McLaughlin :

and Neill Kling, in their capacities as :

members of the Zoning Hearing Board :

of Appeals of Tredyffrin Township :

O R D E R

NOW, September 29, 2017, having considered appellant’s application 

for reargument and appellees’ answers in response thereto, the application is denied.

 

 MARY HANNAH LEAVITT,

 President Judge
David PEARSON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6363.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 39 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 39

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 15, 2013

  Mr. Neugebauer introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Any bill, resolution, or other legislative measure 
changing the internal revenue laws shall require for final adoption in 
each House the concurrence of two-thirds of the Members of that House 
voting and present, unless that bill, resolution, or other legislative 
measure is determined at the time of adoption, in a reasonable manner 
prescribed by law, not to increase the internal revenue by more than a 
de minimis amount. For the purposes of determining any increase in the 
internal revenue under this section, there shall be excluded any 
increase resulting from the lowering of an effective rate of any tax. 
On any vote for which the concurrence of two-thirds is required under 
this article, the yeas and nays of the Members of either House shall be 
entered on the Journal of that House.
    ``Section 2. The Congress may waive the requirements of this 
article when a declaration of war is in effect. The Congress may also 
waive this article when the United States is engaged in military 
conflict which causes an imminent and serious threat to national 
security and is so declared by a joint resolution, adopted by a 
majority of the whole number of each House, which becomes law. Any 
increase in the internal revenue enacted under such a waiver shall be 
effective for not longer than two years.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32(a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TRW
Automotive Holdings Corp. (the "Company") for the period ended April 1, 2005,
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, John C. Plant, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: May 5, 2005                          /s/ John C. Plant
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           John C. Plant
                                           Chief Executive Officer and President
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Clive Barwin, President, CEO and Secretary of Melt Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Melt Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Melt Inc.

Dated: May 12, 2004

/s/ Clive BarwinClive Barwin
President, CEO, Secretary and Director
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Melt Inc. and will be retained by Melt Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT TONARYAZE GRAY, DOC #H52399, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-1734 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed February 22, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Keith P. Spoto, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Joanna Beth Conner, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, SLEET, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 02/11/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      570,613
COMMITMENTS
 107,317   24,897  161,595  284,648  370,611  553,560  557,103   17,053   13,510

CHANGES FROM 02/04/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     25,924)
  -1,875    2,205    9,094   19,943   14,683   27,162   25,982   -1,238      -58

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    18.8      4.4     28.3     49.9     64.9     97.0     97.6      3.0      2.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      146)
      36       37       60       61       66      131      133
```

----

Updated February 14, 2014