alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Darren C. Dunckel, certify that:





(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Atomic Paintball Inc., (Registrant).





(2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;





(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





(4) The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c) disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an quarterly report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





(5) The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information ; and





(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.







Date: June 30, 2014








By:
/s/ Darren C. DunckelDarren C. DunckelChief Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
Independent Auditors' Consent



To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of 
Smith Barney Funds, Inc.:

We consent to the use of our reports, with respect to the 
portfolios indicated below, of Smith Barney Funds, Inc. 
incorporated herein by reference and to the references to our 
Firm under the headings "Financial Highlights" in the 
Prospectus and "Independent Auditors" in the Statement of 
Additional Information.

	        							       

Portfolio	
Date of
Auditors' 
Report

U.S. Government Securities Portfolio		
February  7, 1997

Equity Income Portfolio				
February 19, 1997 

Short-Term U.S. Treasury Securities Portfolio	
February  19, 1997

Income Return Account Portfolio			
February  19, 1997	
	





	
KPMG Peat 
Marwick LLP		

New York, New York	
April 28, 1997
Richard VALENTINI, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8240.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/08/14          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      359,952
COMMITMENTS
 105,096  136,842   90,082  144,046  106,211  339,224  333,135   20,728   26,817

CHANGES FROM 04/01/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,906)
  -9,743   -8,570    2,653    6,105    6,239     -985      322    3,891    2,584

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    29.2     38.0     25.0     40.0     29.5     94.2     92.5      5.8      7.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      177)
      57       65       74       38       38      135      147
```

----

Updated April 11, 2014
UNDER SEAL 

EXHIBIT 4 

Case 2:24-cv-00093-JRG Document 106-4 Filed 11/22/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:

5675
John C. CARNEY, Governor of Delaware, Petitioner v. James R. ADAMS

No. 19-309

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 6, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit granted. In addition to the questions presented by the petition, the parties is directed to brief and argue the following question: Whether respondent has demonstrated Article III standing.
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with this Quarterly Report of BTX Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Scott J. Silverman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| 1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006, fully complies with the |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 
| 2. | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of BTX Holdings, Inc. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

   
| Dated: August 14, 2006 |
|------------------------|

 

**BTX HOLDINGS, INC.**

 
| By: | */s/ Scott J. Silverman*Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
[Cite as Chernin v. Geauga Park Dist., 2018-Ohio-1717.]

{¶1} On August 14, 2017, requester Shelley Chernin made a public records 

request to respondent Geauga Park District for a copy of a constituent letter used by 

Park District board member Andrej Lah during a board meeting. (Complaint at 3.) On 

August 28, 2017, Park District Executive Director John Oros responded that “the letter is 

not considered to be a public record.” (Id. at 5.) On November 17, 2017, Chernin filed a 

complaint under R.C. 2743.75 alleging denial of timely access to public records in 

violation of R.C. 149.43(B). Following unsuccessful mediation, the Park District filed a 

motion to dismiss, and filed an unredacted copy of the requested letters under seal. On 

March 26, 2018, Special Master Clark issued a report finding that the constituent letters 

constituted records of the Geauga Park District, and recommending that the court issue 

an order GRANTING Chernin’s claim for production of the requested records. 

{¶2} R.C. 2743.75(F)(2) states, in part: “Either party may object to the report and 

recommendation within seven business days after receiving the report and 

recommendation by filing a written objection with the clerk * * *.” No objections were 

filed by either party. The court determines that there is no error of law or other defect 

evident on the face of the Special Master’s decision. Therefore, the court adopts the 

Special Master’s report and recommendation as its own, including findings of fact and 

conclusions of law contained therein. 

{¶3} Court costs are assessed against the respondent, and respondent is further 

ordered to make payment of twenty-five dollars to requester as recovery of her filing fee 

SHELLEY K. CHERNIN 

 Requester 

 v. 

GEAUGA PARK DISTRICT 

 Respondent 

Case No. 2017-00922PQ 

Judge Patrick M. McGrath 

ENTRY ADOPTING 

RECOMMENDATION OF 

SPECIAL MASTER 
Case No. 2017-00922PQ -2- ENTRY 

in this case. On provision of invoices or other sufficient evidence, Chernin is further 

entitled to recover from the Geauga Park District any other costs associated with the 

action that were incurred by her. R.C. 2743.75(F)(3)(b). The clerk shall serve upon all 

parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. 

 

PATRICK M. McGRATH 

Judge 

 

Filed April 17, 2018 

Sent to S.C. Reporter 5/4/18
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**WRITTEN STATEMENT**

**OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER**

 

The undersigned hereby certify that the Form 10-Q for the quarterended March 31, 2008 filed by TNS, Inc. with the Securities andExchange Commission fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that information contained in the report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.

 
| Dated: May 12, 2008                                                                                                                     |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                         |
| /s/ HENRY H. GRAHAM, JR.                                                                                                                     |   |
|  

Henry H. Graham, Jr.     Chief Executive Officer                                                                 |
|                                                                                                                                         |
| Dated: May 12, 2008                                                                                                                     |
|                                                                                                                                         |
| /s/ DENNIS L. RANDOLPH, JR.                                                                                                                  |   |
|  

Dennis L.  Randolph, Jr.

   Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer  and

   Treasurer |
|                                                                                                                                              |  |  |

 

----
Sha-Ron HAINES, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5136

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# C_2018368EN.01001201.xml

| 11.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 368/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 368/12

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.8941 — EQT/Widex/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 368/09)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Sivantos Pte. Ltd. (‘Sivantos’, Singapore), controlled by EQT VI Limited and EQT Fund Management SARL (together referred to as ‘EQT’), |
| --- | --- |

—

Sivantos Pte. Ltd. (‘Sivantos’, Singapore), controlled by EQT VI Limited and EQT Fund Management SARL (together referred to as ‘EQT’),

| — | Widex A/S (‘Widex’, Denmark), controlled by Widex Holding A/S (‘Widex Holding’), |
| --- | --- |

—

Widex A/S (‘Widex’, Denmark), controlled by Widex Holding A/S (‘Widex Holding’),

| — | MergeCo A/S, a newly created entity (‘JV’, Denmark). |
| --- | --- |

—

MergeCo A/S, a newly created entity (‘JV’, Denmark).

Widex Holding and EQT acquire, within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation, joint control over the JV, combining the activities of Widex and Sivantos.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.

2.

—   Sivantos: global manufacturer and supplier of hearing aids and hearing accessories,

—   Widex: global manufacturer and supplier of hearing aids and hearing accessories,

—   the JV: global manufacturer and supplier of hearing aids and hearing accessories.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.8941 — EQT/Widex/JV

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| --- |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
Antonio ISLAS-VELOZ, Petitioner, v. William P. BARR, Attorney General.

No. 19-627.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Motion of Law Professors for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
VIA EDGAR 
 
January 9, 1996
 
Securities and Exchange Commission 
Judiciary Plaza 
450 Fifth Street NW 
Washington, DC 
 
ATTN:		Office of Filings, Information and Consumer Services 
 
RE: 		Greenwich Street California Municipal Fund Inc. 
		File No. 33-54549 
 
Gentlemen: 
 
Pursuant to Rule 497(j) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, 
please  accept this letter as certification that the prospectus and the 
statement of  additional information for the above-referenced Portfolio 
does not differ from  that contained in Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 
(the "Amendment") to the  Fund's Registration Statement on Form N-2.  
This Amendment was filed electronically on December 20, 1996 and 
became effective December 23, 1996. 
 
Any comments on this filing should be directed to me at 212-816-5770. 
 
Please return an electronic transmittal as evidence of your receipt of 
this  filing. 
 
 
						Very truly yours, 
 
 
						/s/Robert Nelson 
						Robert Nelson 
						Vice President and 
						Assistant General Counsel
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 06/10/14          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      457,503
COMMITMENTS
 141,056  214,363   96,796  189,112  119,148  426,964  430,307   30,539   27,196

CHANGES FROM 06/03/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      8,577)
   1,391   -2,098    1,428    4,474   10,968    7,293   10,298    1,284   -1,721

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    30.8     46.9     21.2     41.3     26.0     93.3     94.1      6.7      5.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      221)
      71       93       86       41       41      161      179
```

----

Updated June 13, 2014
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GLENN DAVID O’NEAL,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

A. SOLIS; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 13-16832

D.C. No. 1:12-cv-01299-RRB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Ralph R. Beistline, Chief Judge, Presiding** 

Submitted November 18, 2014*** 

Before: LEAVY, FISHER, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Glenn David O’Neal appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various

FILED

DEC 08 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The Honorable Ralph R. Beistline, Chief United States District Judge

for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation.

 *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
constitutional claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de

novo. Albino v. Baca, 747 F.3d 1162, 1171 (9th Cir. 2014) (en banc) (legal rulings

on exhaustion of administrative remedies); Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447

(9th Cir. 2000) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A). We affirm.

The district court properly concluded that O’Neal failed to exhaust his

administrative remedies because the documents attached to the complaint showed

that O’Neal had not exhausted his grievances for each cause of action before

presenting them to the court. See Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 85, 93-95 (2006)

(holding that “proper exhaustion” is mandatory and requires adherence to

administrative procedural rules); see also Durning v. First Boston Corp., 815 F.2d

1265, 1267 (9th Cir. 1987) (court may consider documents attached to the

complaint). 

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying O’Neal’s motion

for reconsideration because O’Neal failed to establish a basis for such relief. See

Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cnty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262-63

(9th Cir. 1993) (standard of review and grounds for reconsideration under Fed. R.

Civ. P. 59(e) and 60(b)).

Because we affirm on the basis of O’Neal’s failure to exhaust, we treat the

judgment as a dismissal without prejudice as to all claims, and do not address

2 13-16832
O’Neal’s contentions concerning the merits of his claims. See Lira v. Herrera, 427

F.3d 1164, 1170 (9th Cir. 2005) (“[A] district court must dismiss a case without

prejudice when there is no presuit exhaustion.” (citation and internal quotation

marks omitted)).

AFFIRMED.

3 13-16832
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONIC CO., LTD and 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, 

INC., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 2:23-cv-00641-JRG-RSP 

DEFENDANTS’ CORPORATE DISCLOSURE 

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 7.1 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., 

Ltd. (“SEC”) and Samsung Electronics America, Inc., (“SEA”) (collectively, “Samsung”), by and 

through its counsel hereby certify that: 

(1) SEC has no parent corporation, and no other publicly held corporation owns 10% 

or more of SEC’s stock; 

(2) SEA is a wholly owned subsidiary of SEC, and no other publicly held corporation 

owns 10% or more of SEA’s stock. 

Dated: April 22, 2024 Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/ Thad C. Kodish 

 Ruffin B. Cordell 

TX Bar No. 04820550 

rbc@fr.com 

Michael J. McKeon 

DC Bar No. 459780 

mckeon@fr.com 

Fish & Richardson P.C. 

1000 Maine Avenue, SW, Ste 1000 

Case 2:23-cv-00641-JRG-RSP Document 26 Filed 04/22/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 885
2 

Washington, D.C. 20024 

Telephone: (202) 783-5070 

Facsimile: (202) 783-2331 

Thad C. Kodish 

GA Bar No. 427603 

tkodish@fr.com 

Christopher O. Green 

GA Bar No. 037617 

cgreen@fr.com 

Sara C. Fish 

GA Bar No. 873853 

sfish@fr.com 

Fish & Richardson P.C. 

1180 Peachtree St. NE, Fl. 21 

Atlanta, GA 30309 

Telephone: (404) 892-5005 

Facsimile: (404) 892-5002 

Melissa R. Smith 

State Bar No. 24001351 

melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com 

Gillam & Smith, LLP 

303 South Washington Avenue 

Marshall, Texas 75670 

Telephone: (903) 934-8450 

Facsimile: (903) 934-9257 

Andrew Thompson (“Tom”) Gorham 

State Bar No. 24012715 

tom@gillamsmithlaw.com 

Gillam & Smith, LLP 

102 N. College, Ste. 800 

Tyler, Texas 75702 

Telephone: (903) 934-8450 

Facsimile: (903) 934-9257 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Samsung Electronics Co., LTD and 

Samsung Electronics America, Inc. 

 

Case 2:23-cv-00641-JRG-RSP Document 26 Filed 04/22/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 886
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that counsel of record who are deemed to have 

consented to electronic services are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s 

CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on April 22, 2024. 

/s/ Thad C. Kodish 

Thad C. Kodish 

Case 2:23-cv-00641-JRG-RSP Document 26 Filed 04/22/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 887
# C_2018410EN.01000101.xml

| 13.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 410/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 410/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8861 — Comcast/Sky)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 410/01)

On 15 June 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8861. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8861. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---