alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018114EN.01000101.xml

| 28.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 114/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 114/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8793 — Axión/Enagás/Axent)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 114/01)

On 8 March 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8793. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8793. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2018217EN.01000401.xml

| 21.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/4

---

Special Report No 14/2018

‘The EU Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Centres of Excellence: more progress needed’

(2018/C 217/03)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 14/2018 ‘The EU Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Centres of Excellence: more progress needed’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu

---
Phillip Auston CARRIER, Petitioner, v. Billy ROMERO, Warden.

No. 19-7640.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Charles DONELSON, petitioner, v. Q. TANNER, et al.

No. 19-5397

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 1
          - [MD Docket No. 21-190; MD Docket No. 22-223; FCC 22-39; FR ID 91190]

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission.

# ACTION:

Notification of amendment.

# SUMMARY:

The Federal Communications Commission released a Report and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in June 2022. The Commission has corrected that document.

# DATES:

June 21, 2022.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The June document is available at                         *https://www.fcc.gov/​document/​fy-2022-regulatory-fees-notice-proposed-rulemaking.*                         To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities, email                         *FCC504@fcc.gov*                         or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432 (TTY).                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Roland Helvajian, Office of Managing Director at (202) 418-0444.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On June 2, 2022, the Federal Communications Commission released a Report and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Report and Order), FCC 22-39, in the above captioned proceeding. The Report and Order has not been published in the                     **Federal Register**                     and is available at                     *https://www.fcc.gov/​document/​fy-2022-regulatory-fees-notice-proposed-rulemaking.*                     To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities, email                     *FCC504@fcc.gov*                     or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432 (TTY). The Commission corrects the date “August 31, 2022” in paragraph 72 of the Ordering Clause to read “September 1, 2022.”                

Federal Communications Commission.

Marlene Dortch,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-12812 Filed 6-17-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BCTC V Assignor Corp. (the "registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|               |  |                            
|-------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:          |  |                            
|March 10, 2005 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|               |  |                            
|               |  | Marc N. Teal               
|               |  | Principal Financial Officer
|               |  |                            
|               |  |                            

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| (logo) WELLS 

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certainPooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2016, by and among WELLSFARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, asSpecial Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as CertificateAdministrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee and TRIMONTREAL ESTATE ADVISORS, LLC, as Operating Advisor and as Asset RepresentationsReviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series2016-NXS6 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. 

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of thisAgreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Servicesdo hereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.       To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/10/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      457,503
COMMITMENTS
 141,056  214,363   96,796  189,112  119,148  426,964  430,307   30,539   27,196

CHANGES FROM 06/03/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      8,577)
   1,391   -2,098    1,428    4,474   10,968    7,293   10,298    1,284   -1,721

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    30.8     46.9     21.2     41.3     26.0     93.3     94.1      6.7      5.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      221)
      71       93       86       41       41      161      179
```

----

Updated June 13, 2014
Marlon BLACHER, Petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 19-7859.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
H. Con. Res. 108 Agreed to July 29, 2014

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 5021) an Act to 

provide an extension of Federal-aid highway, highway safety, motor 

carrier safety, transit, and other programs funded out of the Highway Trust Fund, and for other purposes, the Clerk of the House 

of Representatives shall make the following correction: At the end, 

add the following and conform the table of contents accordingly: 

‘‘TITLE III—TREATMENT FOR PAYGO 

PURPOSES 

‘‘SEC. 3001. BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 

‘‘(a) PAYGO SCORECARD.—The budgetary effects of this Act 

and the amendments made by this Act shall not be entered on 

either PAYGO scorecard maintained pursuant to section 4(d) of 

the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 (2 U.S.C. 933(d)). 

‘‘(b) SENATE PAYGO SCORECARD.—The budgetary effects of this 

Act and the amendments made by this Act shall not be entered 

on any PAYGO scorecard maintained for purposes of section 201 

of S. Con. Res. 21 (110th Congress).’’. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate.
Robert Jessie HILL, Petitioner v. WASHINGTON

No. 19-5965

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2 denied.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL



## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18

- 2250

_____________________________

G ENE E. A LDEN

Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA

,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Walton County.

Kelvin C. Wells, Judge.

July 2, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.

A FFIRMED

.

W ETHERELL

, O STERHAUS

, and W INOKUR

, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or

9.331

.

_____________________________2 Gene E. Alden, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Appellee.
Mitchell TAEBEL, Petitioner v. Douglas A. DUCEY, Governor of Arizona, et al.

No. 19-5906

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 12, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
XIAO QING LIU, Petitioner, v. Matthew DECAGNA, et al.

No. 19M69

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Order entered May 26, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00437-CV

IN RE JIMMY JOHNSON, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. TX-10-31998-C

ORDER

Before Justices Francis, Myers and Schenck

Before the Court are relator’s “Amended Motion to Transfer Venue, ” “Amended Motion 

to Retained,” and motion for permission to file an amended notice of appeal and restricted appeal.

We DENY relator’s motions. 

By order dated May 4, 2015, the Court denied relator’s “Amended Motion for Findings of 

Fact and Conclusions of Law.” By order dated May 7, 2015, the Court denied relator’s “Amended 

Motion to File for a Mandate.” The deadline for seeking reconsideration of the court’s action on 

relator’s petition for writ of mandamus expired on April 30, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.9 

(motion for rehearing may be filed within 15 days after final order is rendered determining petition 

for writ of mandamus). We will take no action on any further motions filed in this proceeding.

/s/ MOLLY FRANCIS 

JUSTICE
VIBE MICRO, INC., Petitioner v. SIG CAPITAL, LLC

No. 19-137

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 10.2

 

FIRST AMENDMENT OF LEASE

 

This FIRST AMENDMENT OF LEASE is entered into this 29th day of February, 2012, by and between Fortune Wakefield, LLC, having a mailing address at c/o Farley White Management Company, 155 Federal Street, Suite 1800, Boston, MA  02110 (hereinafter called “Landlord”) and Metabolix, Inc., having a mailing address at 650 Suffolk Street, Lowell, MA  01854 (hereinafter called “Tenant”)

 

Witnesseth:

 

A.  Landlord and Tenant entered into a certain lease dated March 30, 2007 (the “Lease”), consisting of approximately 13,702 rentable square feet of office space on the first floor of 650 Suffolk Street (hereinafter the “Premises”), all as more particularly described therein.

 

B.  Landlord and Tenant desire to amend the Lease in the manner set forth below.

 

1.              The Lease Term is hereby extended and shall expire on May 31, 2014 (the “Term Expiration Date”).

 

2.              Landlord shall provide to Tenant an allowance (“Tenant Improvement Allowance”) of up to $20,000.00 to be applied to the cost of any alterations, additions, or improvements to be made in and to the Premises, in accordance with Lease Section 6.1.  Landlord shall fund the Tenant Improvement Allowance, or a portion thereof, upon receipt of Tenant’s written request and invoices for all documented and allowable expenses. Tenant may elect to have Landlord or Landlord’s management company arrange the improvements.

 

3.              The Base Rent during the period from the effective date of this First Amendment until the Term Expiration Date shall be the same as is specified for Year 5 as set forth in Lease Section 1.2 of the Lease.

 

Except as specifically amended by the terms of this First Amendment of Lease, all of the terms, conditions and provisions of the Lease shall remain in full force and effect throughout the Lease Term.  From and after the date hereof, the Lease and this First Amendment of Lease shall collectively be referred to as the “Lease.”

 

As of this date, the parties acknowledge that neither has a claim for damage or liability of any kind pursuant to this Lease, as amended, or at law or equity, and the parties hereby agree to release and hold each other harmless from and against all suits, liabilities, obligations or claims or any kind or any matters arising prior to this date.

 

(Signatures on following page)

 

1











 

WITNESS THE EXECUTION HEREOF, under seal, as of the date set forth above, in any number of counterpart copies, each of which counterpart copies shall be deemed an original for all purposes.

 

 

	
LANDLORD:
    	
TENANT:
    
	
FORTUNE   WAKEFIELD, LLC
    	
METABOLIX, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/   Roger W. Altreuter
    	
 
    	
/s/   Richard P. Eno
    
	
By:   Roger W. Altreuter
    	
By:   Richard P. Eno
    
	
Its:   Manager
    	
Its:   President & CEO
    
			


 

2
# C_2018060EN.01000401.xml

| 16.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/4

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections or the measure does not constitute aid

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 60/06)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 25.1.2018 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.43791 (2017/NN) |
| Member State | Ireland |
| Region | — | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Alleged aid to and through the National Asset Management Agency |
| Legal basis | National Asset Management Agency Act of 22 November 2009 |
| Type of measure | Scheme | — |
| Objective | Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy |
| Form of aid | Guarantee |
| Budget | — |
| Intensity | — |
| Duration (period) | — |
| Economic sectors | Other financial service activities; except insurance and pension funding n.e.c. |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Department of Finance |
| Government buildings |
| Merrion Street |
| Dublin 2 |
| IRELAND |

Date of adoption of the decision

25.1.2018

Aid number

SA.43791 (2017/NN)

Member State

Ireland

Region

—

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Alleged aid to and through the National Asset Management Agency

Legal basis

National Asset Management Agency Act of 22 November 2009

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy

Form of aid

Guarantee

Budget

—

Intensity

—

Duration (period)

—

Economic sectors

Other financial service activities; except insurance and pension funding n.e.c.

Name and address of the granting authority

Department of Finance

Government buildings

Merrion Street

Dublin 2

IRELAND

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
#### In the Matter of the Estate of George J. Stier, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County,

June 28, 1973.

*Crowe & Deegan*for petitioner. *Stephen M. McCabe,*guardian ad litem.

John D. Bennett, S.

In this probate proceeding petitioner requests the court to determine the rights of an after-adopted child. The decedent died testate, survived by a wife and after-adopted daughter. Shortly after marrying his wife on November 2, 1968 decedent executed his will on December 12, 1968. His entire estate was left to his wife. However in paragraph thibd he istates: *“*In the event that my wife shall predecease me or that we should both die in a common disaster, then and in that event only, I give and bequeath my interest in a house located at 33 Fourth Street, Glen Cove, New York to my brother, john J. stieb. I give, devise and bequeath all the rest, residue and remainder of my Estate of whatsoever nature and wheresoever situate, in equal shares per stirpes, to my step-daughters, e. LOBBAiNE joncs, of 35-40 164th Street, Flushing, New York, marilynn l. jebemenko of 16 Maple Avenue, Glen Cove, New; York, and nancy l. joncs of Springfield Blvd., Kew Gardens, New York. ’ ’

Thereafter in February, 1970 the decedent formally adopted E. Lorraine Jones mentioned above. The question is: Where a person is mentioned or provided for in a will and is subsequently adopted by the testator, does this entitle the adopted person to an intestate share in the estate *1*In a similar case the testator named “ my friend Helen ” as a beneficiary in his will and some years later adopted her. The court concluded that' the will was not drafted with the 'subsequent adoption in mind and that the will provision did not evidence any awareness of the possibility of future children, natural or adopted *(Matter*
      *635
      *of Guilmartin,*156 Misc. 699, affd.. 250 App. Div. 762, affd. 277 N. Y. 689).

In our case at the time of decedent’s marriage to his wife, she had three children from a prior marriage. In his will of December 12, 1968 he specifically refers to them as “my stepdaughters ” and. refers to the child subsequently adopted by him using her natural father’s surname. There is no evidence that the will was drafted with the subsequent adoption in. mind. Also the will provision does not evidence any awareness of future children, natural or adopted.

Accordingly the propounded instrument will be admitted to probate, the after-adopted child being entitled to the benefits conferred by EPTL 5-3.2. A bond will be required of the executor in the amount of the after-adopted child’s intestate share. An affidavit which will aid the court in fixing the amount of such bond is directed to be submitted with the decree.
Bobby Joe BUCKNER, Petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 19-8128.

Supreme Court of the United States.

June 1, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 29, 2022.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 29, 2022

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A22I0224. NATIONAL EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES INC. d/b/a NATIONAL 

EMS v. CAROLINE SMITH et al.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

SU20CV0433