alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 9 

Prohibiting the House or Senate from adjourning for a period of more 

than 5 days during a fiscal year unless the House involved has adopted 

a concurrent resolution on the budget for such fiscal year and has 

approved legislation to provide funding for the operations of the government for the entire fiscal year. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 22, 2013 

Mr. RIGELL submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Rules 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Prohibiting the House or Senate from adjourning for a period of more than 5 days during a fiscal year unless 

the House involved has adopted a concurrent resolution 

on the budget for such fiscal year and has approved 

legislation to provide funding for the operations of the 

government for the entire fiscal year. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This resolution may be cited as the ‘‘Govern Before 

5 Going Home Resolution’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HCON 9 IH 

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING ADJOURNMENT UNTIL ADOPTION OF 

2 BUDGET AND FUNDING. 

3 (a) PROHIBITING ADJOURNMENT.—The House of 

4 Representatives or Senate may not adjourn for a period 

5 of more than 5 days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and 

6 legal holidays, except when the House or Senate is in ses7 sion on such a day) during a fiscal year unless, at the 

8 time the period of adjournment begins, the House or Sen9 ate (as the case may be)— 

10 (1) has adopted a concurrent resolution on the 

11 budget for such fiscal year; and 

12 (2) has approved each regular appropriation bill 

13 for such fiscal year or, to the extent that it has not 

14 approved such a bill, has approved a continuing res15 olution to provide funding for the entire fiscal year 

16 for the projects and activities covered by such bill. 

17 (b) REGULAR APPROPRIATION BILL DEFINED.—In 

18 this section, the term ‘‘regular appropriation bill’’ means 

19 any annual appropriation bill making appropriations, oth20 erwise making funds available, or granting authority, for 

21 any of the following categories of projects and activities: 

22 (1) Agriculture, rural development, Food and 

23 Drug Administration, and related agencies pro24 grams. 

25 (2) The Departments of Commerce, Justice, 

26 Science, and related agencies. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with 
3 

•HCON 9 IH 

1 (3) The Department of Defense. 

2 (4) Energy and water development, and related 

3 agencies. 

4 (5) Financial services and general government. 

5 (6) The Department of Homeland Security. 

6 (7) The Department of the Interior, environ7 ment, and related agencies. 

8 (8) The Departments of Labor, Health and 

9 Human Services, and Education, and related agen10 cies. 

11 (9) The legislative branch. 

12 (10) Military construction and veterans affairs. 

13 (11) The Department of State, foreign oper14 ations, and related programs. 

15 (12) The Departments of Transportation, 

16 Housing and Urban Development, and related agen17 cies. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
HIGH INCOME OPPORTUNITY FUND, INC.
                          10f-3 REPORT
               April 1, 1997 through July 31, 1997
                                


Trade                         Par Value/     Unit      % of
Issuer              Date      Selling Dealer      Shares
Price          Issue

Extendicare         11/25/97       NationsBanc         4,575,000
$100.000  10.00%
9.35 due12/15/2007            Montgomery Securities

Espirit Telecom          12/12/97       Lehman Brothers
8,029,616  100.000       12.37
11.500% due 12/15/2007

Alllegiance Telecom  1/29/97       Morgan Stanley      4,400,000
56.287          8.38
Lamont Renard STEWART, Petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

No. 19-5164

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Independent Auditors' Report


The Board of Directors of the
Smith Barney Appreciation Fund Inc.:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements of Smith
Barney Appreciation Fund Inc. (the "Fund") for the year ended December 31,
2000, we considered its internal control, including control activities for
safeguarding securities, in order to determine our auditing procedures for the
purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and to comply
with the requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on internal
control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and maintaining
internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments
by management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs
of controls.  Generally, controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the
entity's objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. Those controls include the
safeguarding of assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, error or fraud may occur
and not be detected.  Also, projection of any evaluation of internal control
to future periods is subject to the risk that it may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily disclose all
matters in internal control that might be material weaknesses under standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A
material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of one or
more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low
level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in amounts that
would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited may
occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal
course of performing their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters
involving internal control and its operation, including controls for
safeguarding securities, that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined
above as of December 31, 2000.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of management, the
Board of Directors of the Fund, and the Securities and Exchange Commission and
is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these
specified parties.


February 9, 2001
Lewis TAYLOR Jr., Petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 19-8042.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District denied.
JUN XIAO, Petitioner, v. REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA, et al.

No. 19-580.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for rehearing denied.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1049 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Disperse Red 60. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2013 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Disperse 

Red 60. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DISPERSE RED 60. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.03.49 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Disperse Red 60) is amended by striking the date in the 

7 effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2016’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1049 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEET AND THE  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT OF INCOME FILED AS
PART OF THE  ANNUAL  REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           8,320
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,751
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,378
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,319
<PP&E>                                          32,099
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,804
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  73,407
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,564
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            51
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,223
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    73,407
<SALES>                                         86,958
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                86,958
<CGS>                                           67,934
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,934
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,555
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,841
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,995
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,846
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    383
<CHANGES>                                        1,259
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,204
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .44
        

</TABLE>
Roberto Nieto CRUZ, Petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 18-9310

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District denied.
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

# **ANNUALSTATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2017, by andamong DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, AEGON USA REALTYADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asTrustee and WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as CertificateAdministrator, Paying Agent and Custodian with respect to DBUBS 2017-BRBKMortgage Trust Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. 

 

Pursuant to Section 11.07 ofthis Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial MortgageServices do hereby certify that: 

 

1.            A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period fromJanuary 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and 

 

2.           To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period. 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary 2019. 

 

 

/s/LeslieHayton

LeslieHayton 

Managing Director

WellsFargo Bank 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.5

                                November 10, 2003

Mr. Morris H. Wheeler
Chief Executive Officer
Cohesant Technologies Inc.
5845 West 82nd Street
Indianapolis, IN 46278

Dear Morris:

         This letter confirms that, pursuant to action of the Board of Directors
on November 9, 2003, your Base Salary (as defined in the Employment and
Confidentiality Agreement Dated December 1, 2001) was increased to $153,010 per
annum, effective December 1, 2003.

                                             Very truly yours,

                                             /s/ Dwight D. Goodman
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             Dwight D. Goodman,
                                             Chairman of the Board of Directors

Acknowledged this 10 day of November, 2003.

/s/ Morris H. Wheeler
------------------------------
Morris H. Wheeler
Donald J. TRUMP, President of the United States, et al. v. SIERRA CLUB, et al.

No. 19A60

Supreme Court of the United States.

July 31, 2020

The motion to lift stay is denied.

Justice BREYER, with whom Justice GINSBURG, Justice SOTOMAYOR, and Justice KAGAN join, dissenting from denial of motion to lift stay.

Just over a year ago, I suggested "a straightforward way" to avoid irreparable harm to the parties in this litigation: stay the District Court's injunction "only to the extent" that it "prevents the Government from finalizing [relevant] contracts or taking other preparatory administrative action, but leave [the injunction] in place insofar as it precludes the Government from disbursing those funds or beginning construction." *Trump* v. *Sierra Club* , 588 U. S. ----, ---- - ----, 140 S.Ct. 1, 2, 204 L.Ed.2d 1170 (2019) (opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part from grant of stay).

Now, the Government has apparently finalized its contracts, avoiding the irreparable harm it claimed in first seeking a stay. The Court's decision to let construction continue nevertheless, I fear, may "operat[e], in effect, as a final judgment." *Id.* , at ----, 140 S.Ct., at 1. I would therefore lift the Court's stay of the District Court's injunction.
SMH Varitek Note Extension and Amendment Agreement



  
 Exhibit 10.38

  
 EXTENSION AND AMENDMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 WITNESSETH: 
  
 WHEREAS, the secured promissory note of Varitek Industries, Inc. (n/k/a
Remote Knowledge, Inc.) payable to SMH Varitek, LLC dated November 27, 2002 (the “Promissory Note”) and the related Security Agreement, Guaranty, Stock Pledge Agreement and Stockholders’ Agreement dated even date therewith require the
repayment of the principal of said note to the holder, SMH Varitek, LLC on or about November 27, 2003 (“Maturity Date”); and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Promissory Note is convertible under certain circumstances in accordance with this terms on or before the Maturity Date; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the events that would result in a conversion of the principal of the
Promissory Note have not yet closed but are expected to close within a reasonably short period of time subsequent to the Maturity Date and the parties hereto would prefer to permit the conversion of the principal amount of the Promissory Note.

  
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
  
 1. Extension of the Maturity Date. The Maturity Date of the above referenced Promissory Note shall be extended until May 27, 2004 or to such other
subsequent date that may be agreed to by all of the parties in writing. 
  
 2. Universal Amendment. This new definition of the Maturity Date shall apply to all of the constituent documents regarding the Promissory Note and no default shall result under the Promissory Note or any of the other constituent
documents so long as payment or conversion of the Promissory Note is made in accordance with the terms of the Note as amended hereby. 
  
 3. All Other Terms. All other terms of the Promissory Note and the constituent documents shall remain as is except as amended by necessity to
comport with the revised definition of the Maturity Date set forth herein. 
  
 Dated this 28th day of January 2004. 
  

			
	 SMH VARITEK LLC, a Delaware
 limited liability company

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Richard C. Webb


	 	 	 
	 Richard C. Webb, Manager


	 Print Name and Authority



  

 1 









			
	 Remote Knowledge, Inc., a
 Delaware corporation

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Randy S. Bayne


	 	 	     Randy S. Bayne, President and
         Chief Executive Officer
         (f/ka Varitek Industries, Inc.)



  

 2
Amended Wells Fargo Bank Revolving Line of Credit Note,dated November 25,2003



 Exhibit 10.16 B 
  
 November 25, 2003 
  
 Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp. 
 15822 Bernardo Center Dr. Suite A 

San Diego, CA 92127 
  
 Gentlemen: 
  
 This letter is to
confirm that WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (“Bank”) has agreed to extend the maturity date of that certain credit accommodation granted by Bank to GARDEN FRESH RESTAURANT CORP. (“Borrower”) in the maximum principal
amount of Six Million Dollars ($6,000,000.00) pursuant to the terms and conditions of that certain Credit Agreement between Bank and Borrower dated as of November 1, 2002, as amended from time to time (the “Agreement”). 
  
 The maturity date of said credit accommodation, and the last day on which
Bank will issue letters of credit under the subfeature relating to said credit accommodation, as described in the Agreement, is hereby extended until April 30, 2004. Until such date, all terms and conditions of the Agreement which pertain to said
credit accommodation shall remain in full force and effect, except as expressly modified hereby. The promissory note dated as of November 1, 2002, executed by Borrower and payable to the order of Bank which evidences said credit accommodation, a
copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “Note”), shall be deemed modified as of the date this letter is acknowledged by Borrower to reflect the new maturity date set forth above. All other terms and conditions of the Note
remain in full force and effect, without waiver or modification. 
  
 Borrower acknowledges that Bank has not committed to make any renewal or further extension of the maturity date of the above-described credit accommodation beyond the new maturity date specified herein, and that any such renewal or further
extension remains in the sole discretion of Bank. This letter constitutes the entire agreement between Bank and Borrower with respect to the maturity date extension for the above-described credit accommodation, and supersedes all prior negotiations,
discussions and correspondence concerning said extension. 
  
 Please acknowledge your acceptance of the terms and conditions contained herein by dating and signing one copy below and returning it to my attention at the above address on or before December 15, 2003. 
  

			
	 Very truly yours,

	
	 WELLS FARGO BANK,
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/    ALVA
DIAZ        


	 	 	 Alva Diaz
 Vice President



  
 Acknowledged and accepted as of
Nov 25, 2003 
  

			
	 GARDEN FRESH RESTAURANT CORP.

		
	By:	 	 /s/    DAVID W.
QUALLS        


	Title:	 	CFO
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-50442

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Martin Barro-Chaparro, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 4:23-CR-4-2

______________________________

Before Willett, Duncan, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Martin Barro-Chaparro has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 

(5th Cir. 2011). Barro-Chaparro has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 6, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-50442 Document: 00516991624 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/06/2023
No. 23-50442

2

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 23-50442 Document: 00516991624 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/06/2023
Kenneth H. BURKE, Jr., Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5312

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Trustand Servicing Agreement dated as of February 23, 2018, by and among NATIXISCOMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES LLC, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Servicer, AEGON USA REALTY ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer,WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator with respect to Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates, Series 2018-ALXA (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 13.7 of thisAgreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Servicesdo hereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Servicer during the period from February 23,2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performanceper the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2.       To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all ofits obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector 

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
NEW YORK, Petitioner, v. Jahmarley JONES.

No. 19-6

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 21, 2019

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department denied.