alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018302EN.01000102.xml

| 28.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 302/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 302/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9008 — Elixia Holding/TryghedsGruppen/Fitness DK Holding)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 302/02)

On 27 July 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9008. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9008. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Jose PASSALACQUA, Petitioner, v. Mike MCDONALD, Warden.

No. 19-8093.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 26, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018362EN.01001401.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 8.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 362/14 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9048 — Delta Electronics/Delta Electronics Thailand)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 362/12)

1.

On 1 October 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018362EN.01001401-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Delta Electronics, Inc. (‘DEI’, Taiwan), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Delta Electronics (Thailand) Public Company Ltd (‘DET’, Thailand). |

DEI acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of DET.

The concentration is accomplished by way of public bid announced on 31 July 2018.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for DEI: DEI is primarily active in power and thermal management solutions but also present in the manufacturing and sale of industrial automation products, digital display products, telecommunication products, components for consumer electronics products, building automation solutions, renewable energy technology solutions, etc.,

—   for DET: DET is an electronics manufacturing company focused on the production of power supplies, fan and thermal management, power systems, automotive electronics and related products. The products are used in applications for automotive, medical, telecommunications, IT, and more.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018362EN.01001401-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9048 — Delta Electronics/Delta Electronics Thailand

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018362EN.01001401-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018362EN.01001401-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 102 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 102

   Providing for the appointment of Risa Lavizzo-Mourey as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 13, 2013

   Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas (for himself, Mr. Becerra, and Mr. Cole) 
 introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   Providing for the appointment of Risa Lavizzo-Mourey as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the 
Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other 
than Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the expiration of the 
term of Patricia Q. Stonesifer of Washington on December 22, 2013, is 
filled by the appointment of Risa Lavizzo-Mourey of Pennsylvania. The 
appointment is for a term of 6 years, beginning on the later of 
December 22, 2013, or the date of the enactment of this joint 
resolution.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2017069EN.01000401.xml

| 4.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/4

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine applies

(2017/C 69/04)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 (2).

2

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 208/2014.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (3).

3

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 66, 6.3.2014, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

3

---
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Ruth Hayes v. Strata Marquis LLC

Appellate case number: 01-19-00462-CV

Trial court case number: 1130451

Trial court: County Court at Law No. 1 of Harris County

Appellant filed an affidavit of inability to pay costs in the trial court. The appellate record 

does not indicate that the trial court overruled the party’s claim of indigence. See TEX. R. APP. 

20.1(b)(1). Appellant may therefore proceed on appeal without payment of costs. See id.

The Clerk of this Court is ORDERED to make an entry in this Court’s records that 

appellant is indigent and is allowed to proceed on appeal without payment of costs. See id.

The trial court clerk is ORDERED to provide a complete copy of the clerk’s record and 

the reporter’s record to appellant without charge. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Sherry Radack___

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___June 27, 2019___
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Marinus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: September 12, 2014 | /s/ Christopher M. Cashman                   |
|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|                          | President and Chief Executive Officer        |
|                          | (Principal executive officer)                |
|                          |                                         |
| Date: September 12, 2014 | /s/ Edward F. Smith                          |
|                          | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer        |
|                          | (Principal financial and accounting officer) |

 

----
# C_2017436EN.01000702.xml

| 16.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 436/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 436/7

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2017/C 436/12)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 25.11.2017 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 25.11.2017-31.12.2017 |
| Member State | Belgium |
| Stock or Group of stocks | HAD/7X7A34 |
| Species | Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) |
| Zone | VIIb-k, VIII, IX and X; Union waters of CECAF 34.1.1 |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 45/TQ127 |

Date and time of closure

25.11.2017

Duration

25.11.2017-31.12.2017

Member State

Belgium

Stock or Group of stocks

HAD/7X7A34

Species

Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus)

Melanogrammus aeglefinus

Zone

VIIb-k, VIII, IX and X; Union waters of CECAF 34.1.1

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

45/TQ127

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA '

'

versus ' NO. 1:24-CR-15-MAC

'

LEQUINTE DANGELO JOHNSON '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Stetson conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued her Findings of Fact and Recommendation 

on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. Judge Stetson recommended that 

the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. She further recommended that the court adjudge 

the Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to Judge Stetson’s findings. The court ORDERS that the 

Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge are 

ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea.

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Lequinte Dangelo Johnson, is 

adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 

2250(a)—Failure to Register as a Sex Offender.

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 2nd day of July, 2024.

Case 1:24-cr-00015-MAC-ZJH Document 21 Filed 07/02/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 46
Duryane Lewis CHANEY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5278

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
IA 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 19 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States giving 

Congress power to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the 

United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 18, 2013 

Mrs. EMERSON introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States giving Congress power to prohibit the physical 

desecration of the flag of the United States. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HJ 19 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘The Congress shall have power to prohibit the phys3 ical desecration of the flag of the United States.’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER PARTNERS II LLC,

 Plaintiff,

v.

T-MOBILE USA, INC. and SPRINT 

LLC,

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-cv-00015-JRG-RSP

ORDER

Before the Court is the Unopposed Motion to Withdraw as Counsel filed by Plaintiff 

Headwater Partners II LLC. Dkt. No. 53. After consideration, and noting its unopposed nature, the 

Motion is GRANTED. It is

ORDERED that Robert Christopher Bunt, Charles Ainsworth, and the firm Parker Bunt 

& Ainsworth, PC are withdrawn as counsel for Plaintiff in the above captioned case.

Case 2:24-cv-00015-JRG-RSP Document 64 Filed 07/19/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 585
In the Matter of DISCIPLINE OF Maurice Rudolph FRANKS.

No. D-3052.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 23, 2019.

Maurice Rudolph Franks, of Baker, Louisiana, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
IN RE John WALLACE, Petitioner.

No. 19-7374.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for rehearing denied.
Roy Allen NICHOLS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8400.

Supreme Court of the United States.

June 1, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 98-1131NI

_____________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Northern v. * District of Iowa. * Kevin Leon Bassham, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

_____________ Submitted: June 9, 1998

Filed: June 15, 1998

_____________ Before FAGG, BRIGHT, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Kevin Leon Bassham appeals his bank robbery an d firearms convictions and the sentence imposed by the district court. First, finding no error, plain or otherwise, we reject Bassham's contentions related to the admissibility of the Government's evidence about Bassham's drug activity. Second, we disagree with Bassham's contention that his past criminal r

ecord does not qualify him for sentencing as a career offender. The district court correctly found t hat Bassham's earlier convictions for attempted burglary and sta lking were crimes of violence for career offender sentencing under th e guidelines. Having rejected Bassham's arguments, we also conclude an extended-2-

opini on by this court would have no precedential value. We thus affirm Bassham' s convictions and sentence without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Eastern District of Texas

Valtrus Innovations Ltd.

2:23cv443

AT&T Inc., AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, 

and AT&T Corp.

AT&T Corp. Matthew G. Berkowitz 

Reichman Jorgensen Lehman & Feldberg LLP 

100 Marine Parkway, Suite 300 

Redwood Shores, CA 94065 

mberkowitz@reichmanjorgensen.com

9/27/2023

Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 7 Filed 09/27/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 303
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

2:23cv443 0.00 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 7 Filed 09/27/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 304
IN RE Curtis SMITH, Petitioner.

No. 19-8161.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 4, 2020

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
The State of TexasAppellee

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 29, 2014

No. 04-14-00023-CR

Jesus AYALA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 406th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2003-CRS-000058-D4

Honorable Oscar J Hale, Jr., Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s motion to appoint counsel is DENIED AS MOOT. Roberto Bali was 

appointed to this appeal on January 14, 2014.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of January, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court