32104 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 103 / Friday, May 27, 2022 / Proposed Rules 

airspace, Class E Surface airspace, and 

Class E Airspace Designated as an 

Extension to Class D airspace at Martin 

State Airport, Baltimore, MD. This 

action would replace the Baltimore 

VORTAC with the term Point of Origin. 

Also, this action would remove 

unnecessary verbiage from the 

description headers. In addition, this 

action would also make an editorial 

change replacing the term Airport/ 

Facility Directory with the term Chart 

Supplement in the legal descriptions of 

associated Class D and E airspace and 

make the editorial change replacing the 

term Notice to Airmen with the term 

Notice to Air Missions. 

Class D and Class E airspace 

designations are published in 

Paragraphs 5000, 6002, and 6004, 

respectively, of FAA Order JO 7400.11F, 

dated August 10, 2021, and effective 

September 15, 2021, which is 

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The Class D and E airspace 

designations listed in this document 

will be published subsequently in FAA 

Order JO 7400.11. 

FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, is 

published yearly and effective on 

September 15. 

Regulatory Notices and Analyses 

The FAA has determined that this 

proposed regulation only involves an 

established body of technical 

regulations for which frequent and 

routine amendments are necessary to 

keep them operationally current. It, 

therefore: (1) Is not a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action’’ under Executive 

Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant 

rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies 

and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 

26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant 

preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation 

as the anticipated impact is so minimal. 

Since this is a routine matter that will 

only affect air traffic procedures and air 

navigation, it is certified that this 

proposed rule, when promulgated, will 

not have a significant economic impact 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

Environmental Review 

This proposal will be subject to an 

environmental analysis in accordance 

with FAA Order 1050.1F, 

‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and 

Procedures,’’ prior to any FAA final 

regulatory action. 

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

The Proposed Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as 

follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 

40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 

1959–1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation 

Administration Order JO 7400.11F, 

Airspace Designations, and Reporting 

Points, dated August 10, 2021, and 

effective September 15, 2021, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace. 

* * * * * 

AEA MD D Baltimore, MD [Amended] 

Martin State Airport, MD 

(Lat. 39°19′32′′ N, long. 76°24′50′′ W) 

Point of Origin 

(Lat. 39°10′16′′ N, long. 76°39′41′′ W) 

That airspace extending upward from the 

surface to and including 2,500 feet MSL 

within a 5.2-mile radius of Martin State 

Airport and within 4.4 miles each side of a 

14.7-mile radius arc of the Point of Origin 

extending clockwise from the Point of 

Origin’s 030° radial to the Point of Origin’s 

046° radial, excluding that airspace within 

the Washington Tri-Area Class B airspace 

area and Restricted Areas R–4001A and R– 

4001B when they are in effect, and Restricted 

Area R–4001C, which is continuously active 

up to 10,000 feet MSL. This Class D airspace 

area is effective during the specific dates and 

times established in advance by a Notice to 

Air Missions. The effective date and time 

will thereafter be continuously published in 

the Chart Supplement. 

Paragraph 6002 Class E Surface Airspace. 

* * * * * 

AEA MD E2 Baltimore, MD [Amended] 

Martin State Airport, MD 

(Lat. 39°19′32′′ N, long. 76°24′50′′ W) 

Point of Origin 

(Lat. 39°10′16′′ N, long. 76°39′41′′ W) 

That airspace within a 5.2-mile radius of 

Martin State Airport and within 4.4 miles 

each side of a 14.7-mile radius arc of the 

Point of Origin extending clockwise from the 

Point of Origin’s 030° radial to the Point of 

Origin’s 046° radial, excluding that airspace 

within the Washington Tri-Area Class B 

airspace area and Restricted Areas R–4001A 

and R–4001B when they are in effect. This 

Class E airspace area is effective during the 

specific dates and times established in 

advance by a Notice to Air Missions. The 

effective date and time will thereafter be 

continuously published in the Chart 

Supplement. 

Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace 

Designated as an Extension to Class D. 

* * * * * 

AEA MD E4 Baltimore, MD [Amended] 

Martin State Airport, MD 

(Lat. 39°19′32′′ N, long. 76°24′50′′ W) 

That airspace extending upward from the 

surface within 4 miles each side of a 134° 

bearing from Martin State Airport extending 

from the 5.2-mile radius of Martin State 

Airport to 9.2 miles southeast of the airport, 

excluding that airspace within the 

Washington Tri-Area Class B airspace area 

and Restricted Areas R–4001A and R–4001B 

when they are in effect. This Class E airspace 

area is effective during the specific dates and 

times established in advance by a Notice to 

Air Missions. The effective date and time 

will thereafter be continuously published in 

the Chart Supplement. 

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on May 23, 

2022. 

Lisa Burrows, 

Manager, Airspace & Procedures Team North, 

Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic 

Organization. 

[FR Doc. 2022–11395 Filed 5–26–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2022–0692; Airspace 

Docket No. 22–ASW–11] 

RIN 2120–AA66 

Proposed Amendment of the Class E 

Airspace; Corsicana, TX 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: This action proposes to 

amend the Class E airspace at Corsicana, 

TX. The FAA is proposing this action 

due to an airspace review conducted as 

part of the decommissioning of the 

Powell non-directional beacon (NDB). 

The geographic coordinates of the 

airport would also be updated to 

coincide with the FAA’s aeronautical 

database. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before July 11, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this 

proposal to the U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, 

West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, 

Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 

366–9826, or (800) 647–5527. You must 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 103 / Friday, May 27, 2022 / Proposed Rules 32105 

identify FAA Docket No. FAA–2022– 

0692/Airspace Docket No. 22–ASW–11, 

at the beginning of your comments. You 

may also submit comments through the 

internet at https://www.regulations.gov. 

You may review the public docket 

containing the proposal, any comments 

received, and any final disposition in 

person in the Dockets Office between 

9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, except federal holidays. 

FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, and 

subsequent amendments can be viewed 

online at https://www.faa.gov/air_

traffic/publications/. For further 

information, you can contact the 

Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 800 Independence 

Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; 

telephone: (202) 267–8783. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jeffrey Claypool, Federal Aviation 

Administration, Operations Support 

Group, Central Service Center, 10101 

Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 

76177; telephone (817) 222–5711. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the United States Code. 

Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the 

authority of the FAA Administrator. 

Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 

describes in more detail the scope of the 

agency’s authority. This rulemaking is 

promulgated under the authority 

described in Subtitle VII, Part A, 

Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that 

section, the FAA is charged with 

prescribing regulations to assign the use 

of airspace necessary to ensure the 

safety of aircraft and the efficient use of 

airspace. This regulation is within the 

scope of that authority as it would 

amend the Class E airspace extending 

upward from 700 feet above the surface 

at C. David Campbell Field-Corsicana 

Municipal Airport, Corsicana, TX, to 

support instrument flight rule 

operations at this airport. 

Comments Invited 

Interested parties are invited to 

participate in this proposed rulemaking 

by submitting such written data, views, 

or arguments, as they may desire. 

Comments that provide the factual basis 

supporting the views and suggestions 

presented are particularly helpful in 

developing reasoned regulatory 

decisions on the proposal. Comments 

are specifically invited on the overall 

regulatory, aeronautical, economic, 

environmental, and energy-related 

aspects of the proposal. 

Communications should identify both 

docket numbers and be submitted in 

triplicate to the address listed above. 

Commenters wishing the FAA to 

acknowledge receipt of their comments 

on this notice must submit with those 

comments a self-addressed, stamped 

postcard on which the following 

statement is made: ‘‘Comments to 

Docket No. FAA–2022–0692/Airspace 

Docket No. 22–ASW–11.’’ The postcard 

will be date/time stamped and returned 

to the commenter. 

All communications received before 

the specified closing date for comments 

will be considered before taking action 

on the proposed rule. The proposal 

contained in this notice may be changed 

in light of the comments received. A 

report summarizing each substantive 

public contact with FAA personnel 

concerned with this rulemaking will be 

filed in the docket. 

Availability of NPRMs 

An electronic copy of this document 

may be downloaded through the 

internet at https://www.regulations.gov. 

Recently published rulemaking 

documents can also be accessed through 

the FAA’s web page at https://

www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/ 

airspace_amendments/. 

You may review the public docket 

containing the proposal, any comments 

received, and any final disposition in 

person in the Dockets Office (see the 

ADDRESSES section for the address and 

phone number) between 9:00 a.m. and 

5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except federal holidays. An informal 

docket may also be examined during 

normal business hours at the Federal 

Aviation Administration, Air Traffic 

Organization, Central Service Center, 

Operations Support Group, 10101 

Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 

76177. 

Availability and Summary of 

Documents for Incorporation by 

Reference 

This document proposes to amend 

FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, 

dated August 10, 2021, and effective 

September 15, 2021. FAA Order JO 

7400.11F is publicly available as listed 

in the ADDRESSES section of this 

document. FAA Order JO 7400.11F lists 

Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, 

air traffic service routes, and reporting 

points. 

The Proposal 

The FAA is proposing an amendment 

to 14 CFR part 71 by amending the Class 

E airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface to within a 6.6- 

mile (increased from a 6.5-mile) radius 

of C. David Campbell Field-Corsicana 

Municipal Airport, Corsicana, TX; 

removing the Powell NDB and the 

associated extensions from the airspace 

legal description; removing the city 

associated with the airport from the 

airspace legal description to comply 

with changes to FAA Order JO 7400.2N, 

Procedures for Handling Airspace 

Matters; and updating the geographic 

coordinates of the airport to coincide 

with the FAA’s aeronautical database. 

This action is the result of an airspace 

review conducted as part of the 

decommissioning of the Powell NDB 

which provided navigation information 

for the instrument procedures at this 

airport. 

Class E airspace designations are 

published in paragraph 6005 of FAA 

Order JO 7400.11F, dated August 10, 

2021, and effective September 15, 2021, 

which is incorporated by reference in 14 

CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace 

designations listed in this document 

will be published subsequently in FAA 

Order JO 7400.11. 

FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, is 

published yearly and effective on 

September 15. 

Regulatory Notices and Analyses 

The FAA has determined that this 

regulation only involves an established 

body of technical regulations for which 

frequent and routine amendments are 

necessary to keep them operationally 

current, is non-controversial and 

unlikely to result in adverse or negative 

comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a 

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under 

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a 

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT 

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) 

does not warrant preparation of a 

regulatory evaluation as the anticipated 

impact is so minimal. Since this is a 

routine matter that will only affect air 

traffic procedures and air navigation, it 

is certified that this rule, when 

promulgated, would not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

Environmental Review 

This proposal will be subject to an 

environmental analysis in accordance 

with FAA Order 1050.1F, 

‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and 

Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final 

regulatory action. 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
32106 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 103 / Friday, May 27, 2022 / Proposed Rules 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, pursuant to the 

authority delegated to me, the Federal 

Aviation Administration proposes to 

amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR 

part 71 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 

40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 

1959–1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO 7400.11F, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated August 10, 2021, and 

effective September 15, 2021, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas 

Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More 

Above the Surface of the Earth. 

* * * * * 

ASW TX E5 Corsicana, TX [Amended] 

C. David Campbell Field-Corsicana 

Municipal Airport, TX 

(Lat. 32°01′41′′ N, long. 96°24′02′′ W) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 6.6-mile 

radius of C. David Campbell Field-Corsicana 

Municipal Airport. 

Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on May 24, 

2022. 

Martin A. Skinner, 

Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, 

ATO Central Service Center. 

[FR Doc. 2022–11408 Filed 5–26–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

GENERAL SERVICES 

ADMINISTRATION 

41 CFR Parts 301–10 and 301–70 

[FTR Case 2022–01; Docket Number GSA– 

FTR–2022–0010, Sequence 1] 

RIN 3090–AK61 

Federal Travel Regulation (FTR); 

Constructive Cost 

AGENCY: Office of Government-wide 

Policy (OGP), General Services 

Administration. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: GSA proposes to amend the 

Federal Travel Regulation (FTR) to 

clarify the concept of ‘‘constructive 

cost’’ as it relates to temporary duty 

travel, and clarify a section regarding 

what mode of transportation agencies 

should compare privately owned 

vehicle costs to when preparing a cost 

construction. These clarifications are 

intended to produce better estimates for 

decision makers. 

DATES: Interested parties should submit 

written comments to the Regulatory 

Secretariat at one of the addresses 

shown below on or before July 26, 2022 

to be considered in the formation of the 

proposed rule. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments in 

response to FTR case 2022–01 to: 

Regulations.gov: https://

www.regulations.gov. Submit comments 

via the Federal eRulemaking portal by 

searching for ‘‘FTR Case 2022–01’’. 

Select the link ‘‘Comment Now’’ that 

corresponds with FTR Case 2022–01. 

Follow the instructions provided at the 

‘‘Comment Now’’ screen. Please include 

your name, company name (if any), and 

‘‘FTR Case 2022–01’’ on your attached 

document. If your comment cannot be 

submitted using https://

www.regulations.gov, call or email the 

points of contact in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section of this 

document for alternate instructions. 

Instructions: Please submit comments 

only and cite FTR Case 2022–01, in all 

correspondence related to this case. 

Comments received generally will be 

posted without change to https://

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal and/or business confidential 

information provided. To confirm 

receipt of your comment(s), please 

check www.regulations.gov, 

approximately two to three days after 

submission to verify posting. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Jill Denning, Office of Government-wide 

Policy, at 202–208–7642 or email at 

travelpolicy@gsa.gov for clarification of 

content. For information pertaining to 

status or publication schedules, contact 

The Regulatory Secretariat (M1V1CB), at 

1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 

20405, 202–501–4755 or email at 

GSARegSec@gsa.gov. Please cite FTR 

case 2022–01. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

GSA is proposing to amend the FTR 

to clarify the concept of ‘‘constructive 

cost’’ as it relates to temporary duty 

travel, and clarify a section regarding 

what mode of transportation agencies 

should compare privately owned 

vehicle (POV) costs to when preparing 

a cost construction. 

When employees perform official 

business away from their official station, 

agencies must select the transportation 

method most advantageous to the 

Government, when cost and other 

factors are considered. Travel must be 

by the most expeditious means of 

transportation practicable and 

commensurate with the nature and 

purpose of the duties. In addition, the 

agency must consider energy 

conservation, total cost to the 

Government (including costs of per 

diem, overtime, lost work time, and 

actual transportation cost), total 

distance traveled, number of points 

visited, and number of travelers. The 

most advantageous transportation mode 

by order of precedence is common 

carrier, Government-furnished 

automobile, and rental car. An agency 

may authorize the use of a POV only 

after the agency evaluates the advantage 

of using the other modes of 

transportation. 

Federal employees may choose to use 

a POV while on temporary duty (TDY) 

travel regardless of the mode of 

transportation the agency directs in the 

travel authorization. However, if the 

agency has directed the employee to use 

a mode of transportation other than POV 

because it is more advantageous to the 

Government, the agency must perform a 

cost comparison, known as a 

constructive cost exercise, to determine 

how much the agency should reimburse 

the traveler when they choose a POV 

over the agency-selected mode of 

transportation. If the mode of 

transportation the agency has 

authorized is less than the cost of 

traveling by POV, the employee only 

receives that limited amount, regardless 

of how much it costs to use a POV. If 

the constructive cost shows that the 

POV cost is less than the agencyselected mode, then the employee will 

receive the total POV-related costs. 

(Agencies are reminded that the FTR 

does not authorize agencies to require 

that employees use their POV for TDY 

travel, even if the costs will be less for 

the Government.) 

GSA is aware that agencies often 

mistakenly calculate TDY constructive 

costs by only comparing the selected 

transportation mode with the POV 

mileage rates without also factoring in 

related travel costs, such as per diem 

expenses, parking, baggage fees, etc. Not 

factoring in these other costs leads to an 

incomplete calculation of the total 

‘‘constructive’’ travel cost that 

employees may incur. 

The Civilian Board of Contract 

Appeals (CBCA) and its predecessor 

board, the General Services Board of 

Contract Appeals (GSCBA) have, in 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1