Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2022 / Notices 33723 

7See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Third Expedited Sunset 

Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain 

Artist Canvas from the People’s Republic of China,’’ 

dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, 

this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

1See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from the 

Republic of Korea: Amended Final Affirmative 

Antidumping Determination and Antidumping 

Duty Order, 84 FR 18767 (May 2, 2019) (Order). 

2See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 

35481 (July 6, 2021). 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Preliminary Results of 2020–2021 Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated December 29, 

2021. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Large Diameter Welded 

Pipe from the Republic of Korea: Decision 

Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020– 

2021,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum). 

canvas pads, canvas rolls (including 

bulk rolls that have been primed), 

printable canvases, floor cloths, and 

placemats) are tightly woven prepared 

painting and/or printing surfaces. Artist 

canvas and stretcher strips (whether or 

not made of wood and whether or not 

assembled) included within a kit or set 

are covered by the order. 

Artist canvases subject to the order 

are currently classifiable under 

subheadings 5901.90.20.00 and 

5901.90.40.00, 5901.90.40.00, 

5903.90.2500, 5903.90.2000, 

5903.90.1000, 5907.00.8090, 

5907.00.8010, and 5907.00.6000 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS). Specifically 

excluded from the scope of the order are 

tracing cloths, ‘‘paint-by-number’’ or 

‘‘paint-it-yourself’’ artist canvases with a 

copyrighted preprinted outline, pattern, 

or design, whether or not included in a 

painting set or kit. Also excluded are 

stretcher strips, whether or not made 

from wood, so long as they are not 

incorporated into artist canvases or sold 

as part of an artist canvas kit or set. 

While the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, our written description of the 

scope of the order is dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in this sunset review 

are addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum, which is hereby adopted 

by this notice.7 The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. A list of 

topics discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is included as 

an appendix to this notice. In addition, 

a complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Final Results of Third Sunset Review 

Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 

752(c) of the Act, Commerce determines 

that revocation of the Order would be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of dumping and that the 

magnitude of the margins of dumping 

likely to prevail is up to 264.09 percent. 

Administrative Protective Order (APO) 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to an APO of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. 

Timely notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation which is subject to 

sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing the 

final results and this notice in 

accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), 

and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2) and 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(5)(ii). 

Dated: May 27, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. History of the Order 

V. Legal Framework 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

1. Likelihood of Continuation or 

Recurrence of Dumping 

2. Magnitude of the Margins Likely to 

Prevail 

VII. Final Results of Third Sunset Review 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–11942 Filed 6–2–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–897] 

Large Diameter Welded Pipe From the 

Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Partial Rescission; 2020– 

2021 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily determines 

that Hyundai RB Co., Ltd. (Hyundai RB) 

made sales of large diameter welded 

pipe (welded pipe) from the Republic of 

Korea (Korea) at prices below normal 

value (NV), while Hyundai Steel 

Company (Hyundai Steel) did not make 

sales of the subject merchandise at 

prices below NV during the period of 

review (POR), May 1, 2020, through 

April 30, 2021. Commerce further 

determines that sales by the nonexamined companies were made at 

prices below NV. We invite interested 

parties to comment on these preliminary 

results. 

DATES: Applicable June 3, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Katherine Johnson or Samantha Kinney, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office VIII, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4929 or 

(202) 482–2285, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On May 2, 2019, Commerce published 

the antidumping duty order on welded 

pipe from Korea.1 On July 6, 2021, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i), Commerce initiated an 

administrative review of the Order.2

Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

on December 29, 2021, Commerce 

determined that it was not practicable to 

complete the preliminary results of this 

review within 245 days and extended 

the deadline for the preliminary results 

of this review by 120 days, until May 

31, 2022.3

For a detailed description of the 

events that followed the initiation of 

this review, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum.4 The 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is available via 

Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum can be found at https:// 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
33724 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2022 / Notices 

5The Domestic Interested Party is the American 

Line Pipe Producers Association Trade Committee. 

6See Domestic Interested Party’s Letter, ‘‘Partial 

Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,’’ 

dated October 4, 2021. 

7See, e.g., Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel 

Products from Taiwan: Final Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Final Determination of No Shipments; 2018–1019, 

86 FR 28554, 28555 (May 27, 2021). 

8See Appendix II. 

9See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

10See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). 

11See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1) and (2); see also 

Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service 

Requirements Due to COVID–19, 85 FR 17006 

(March 26, 2020); and Temporary Rule Modifying 

AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; 

Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 

2020) (Temporary Rule). 

12See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

13See 19 CFR 351.303. 

14See 19 CFR 351.303(f). 

15See Temporary Rule. 

access.trade.gov/public/FRNotices

ListLayout.aspx. 

Scope of the Order 

The product covered by the Order is 

welded pipe from Korea. For a full 

description of the scope, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

Partial Rescission of Administrative 

Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

Commerce will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if the party who requested the 

review withdraws the request within 90 

days of the date of publication of the 

notice of initiation of the requested 

review. On October 4, 2021, the 

Domestic Interested Party 5 timely 

withdrew its request for reviews of EM 

Solution Co., Ltd.; Hansol Metal Co., 

Ltd.; Hawin; Hyosung; POSCO; and 

Samkang M&T Co., Ltd.6 Because there 

was a timely withdrawal of all requests 

for review of these six companies, we 

are rescinding this review with respect 

to these companies, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1). 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Act. For a full description of the 

methodology underlying these 

preliminary results, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. A list of topics 

included in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is included as Appendix 

I to this notice. 

Rate for Non-Selected Companies 

The statute and Commerce’s 

regulations do not address the 

establishment of a weighted-average 

dumping margin to be determined for 

companies not selected for individual 

examination when Commerce limits its 

examination in an administrative review 

pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the 

Act. Generally, Commerce looks to 

section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which 

provides instructions for calculating the 

all-others rate in an investigation, for 

guidance when determining the 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

companies which were not selected for 

individual examination in an 

administrative review. Under section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others 

rate is normally ‘‘an amount equal to the 

weighted average of the estimated 

weighted average dumping margins 

established for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding any 

zero and de minimis margins, and any 

margins determined entirely {on the 

basis of facts available}.’’ 

In this review, the preliminary 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

Hyundai RB is not zero, de minimis, or 

based entirely on facts otherwise 

available, whereas Hyundai Steel’s 

preliminary weighted-average dumping 

margin is zero. Therefore, Commerce 

has preliminarily assigned a weightedaverage dumping margin to the nonexamined companies that is equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

Hyundai RB in accordance with its 

practice.7

Preliminary Results of the Review 

We preliminarily determine that the 

following weighted-average dumping 

margins exist for the period May 1, 

2020, through April 30, 2021: 

Exporter or producer 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Hyundai RB Co., Ltd .................. 2.67 

Hyundai Steel Company ............. 0.00 

Non-Examined Companies 8 ...... 2.67 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed for these preliminary results 

to interested parties with an 

Administrative Protective Order within 

five days after the date of public 

announcement of the preliminary 

results.9

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), 

interested parties may submit case briefs 

no later than 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice.10 Rebuttal 

briefs, limited to issues raised in the 

case briefs, may be filed not later than 

seven days after the date for filing case 

briefs.11 Parties who submit case briefs 

or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are 

encouraged to submit with each 

argument: (1) A statement of the issue; 

(2) a brief summary of the argument; 

and (3) a table of authorities.12

Executive summaries should be limited 

to five pages total, including footnotes. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing must submit a written request to 

the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance, filed electronically via 

ACCESS, within 30 days after the date 

of publication of this notice. Requests 

should contain: (1) The party’s name, 

address, and telephone number; (2) the 

number of participants; and (3) a list of 

issues to be discussed. Issues raised in 

the hearing will be limited to those 

raised in the respective case and 

rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing 

is made, Commerce intends to hold the 

hearing at a date and time to be 

determined. 

All briefs and hearing requests must 

be filed electronically using ACCESS 13

and must be served on interested 

parties.14 An electronically filed 

document must be received successfully 

in its entirety by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. 

Eastern Time. Note that Commerce has 

temporarily modified certain of its 

requirements for serving documents 

containing business proprietary 

information, until further notice.15

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce intends to determine, and 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties 

on all appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise covered by this review. 

Commerce intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after the date of publication of the 

final results of this administrative 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

For an individually examined 

respondent whose weighted-average 

dumping margin is not zero or de 

minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent), 

upon completion of the final results, 

Commerce intends to calculate 

importer-specific antidumping duty 

assessment rates on the basis of the ratio 

of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for each importer’s examined 

sales to the total entered value of those 

sales. Where we do not have entered 

values for all U.S. sales to a particular 

importer, we will calculate an importerVerDate Sep<11>2014 19:48 Jun 02, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM 03JNN1

khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2022 / Notices 33725 

16See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

17See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2); see also 

Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the 

Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 

(February 14, 2012). 

18See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

19See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 20See Order. 

specific, per-unit assessment rate on the 

basis of the ratio of the total amount of 

dumping calculated for the importer’s 

examined sales to the total quantity of 

those sales.16 To determine whether an 

importer-specific, per-unit assessment 

rate is de minimis, in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we also will 

calculate an importer-specific ad 

valorem ratio based on estimated 

entered values. Where either a 

respondent’s weighted-average dumping 

margin is zero or de minimis, or an 

importer-specific assessment rate is zero 

or de minimis, we intend to instruct 

CBP to liquidate appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties.17

For entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by each 

individually examined respondent for 

which it did not know its merchandise 

was destined for the United States, we 

intend to instruct CBP to liquidate such 

entries at the all-others rate if there is no 

rate for the intermediate company(ies) 

involved in the transaction.18

For the companies which were not 

selected for individual examination, we 

intend to assign an antidumping duty 

assessment rate equal to the weightedaverage dumping margin determined for 

the non-examined companies in the 

final results of review. 

For the companies for which we have 

rescinded this review, Commerce 

intends to instruct CBP to assess 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries at a rate equal to the cash deposit 

rate of estimated antidumping duties 

required at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, for 

consumption, during the period May 1, 

2020, through April 30, 2021, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends to 

issue assessment instructions to CBP for 

the rescinded companies no earlier than 

35 days after the date of publication of 

the preliminary results of this 

administrative review in the Federal 

Register. 

The final results of this review shall 

be the basis for the assessment of 

antidumping duties on entries of 

merchandise covered by the final results 

of this review and for future cash 

deposits of estimated antidumping 

duties, where applicable.19

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for the companies 

listed above will be equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margin 

established in the final results of this 

review, except if the rate is less than 

0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis 

within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash 

deposit rate will be zero; (2) for 

previously reviewed or investigated 

companies not covered in this review, 

including the six companies for which 

Commerce is rescinding this review, the 

cash deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recently-completed segment of this 

proceeding in which the company was 

reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm 

covered in this review, a prior 

completed review, or the less-than-fair 

value (LTFV) investigation, but the 

producer is, then the cash deposit rate 

will be the company-specific rate 

established for the most recentlycompleted segment of this proceeding 

for the producer of subject merchandise; 

and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 

producers and exporters will continue 

to be 7.08 percent, the all-others rate 

established in the LTFV investigation.20

These cash deposit requirements, 

when imposed, shall remain in effect 

until further notice. 

Final Results of the Review 

Unless otherwise extended, 

Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of this administrative review, 

including the results of our analysis of 

issues raised by the parties in the 

written comments, within 120 days of 

publication of these preliminary results 

in the Federal Register, pursuant to 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.213(h)(1). 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this POR. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of doubled 

antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

These preliminary results are issued 

and published in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: May 27, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Partial Rescission of Review 

V. Discussion of the Methodology 

VI. Currency Conversion 

VII. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to 

Companies Not Selected for Individual 

Review 

1. AJU Besteel Co., Ltd. 

2. Chang Won Bending Co., Ltd. 

3. Daiduck Piping Co., Ltd. 

4. Dong Yang Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. 

5. Dongbu Incheon Steel Co., Ltd. 

6. EEW KHPC Co., Ltd. 

7. EEW Korea Co., Ltd. 

8. Histeel Co., Ltd. 

9. Husteel Co., Ltd. 

10. Kiduck Industries Co., Ltd. 

11. Kum Kang Kind. Co., Ltd. 

12. Kumsoo Connecting Co., Ltd. 

13. Nexteel Co., Ltd. 

14. SeAH Steel Corporation 

15. SeAH Steel, Co., Ltd. 

16. Seonghwa Industrial Co., Ltd. 

17. SIN–E B&P Co., Ltd. 

18. Steel Flower Co., Ltd. 

19. WELTECH Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2022–11956 Filed 6–2–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Institute of Standards and 

Technology 

Board of Overseers of the Malcolm 

Baldrige National Quality Award and 

Judges Panel of the Malcolm Baldrige 

National Quality Award 

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards 

and Technology, Department of 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of open meeting. 

SUMMARY: The Board of Overseers of the 

Malcolm Baldrige National Quality 

Award (Board of Overseers) and the 

Judges Panel of the Malcolm Baldrige 

National Quality Award (Judges Panel) 

will meet in open session on Thursday, 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES