alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1095 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 9, 2013 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, 

and Transportation 

AN ACT 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to direct the Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation Security Administration) to transfer unclaimed money recovered at airport security checkpoints to nonprofit organizations that provide places of rest and recuperation 

at airports for members of the Armed Forces and their 

families, and for other purposes. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1095 RFS

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘TSA Loose Change 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DISPOSITION OF UNCLAIMED MONEY RECOVERED 

7 AT AIRPORT SECURITY CHECKPOINTS. 

8 (a) DISPOSITION OF UNCLAIMED MONEY.—Section 

9 44945(a) of title 49, United States Code, is amended— 

10 (1) by inserting ‘‘after the date of enactment of 

11 the TSA Loose Change Act,’’ after ‘‘title 31,’’; 

12 (2) by striking ‘‘shall be retained by the Trans13 portation Security Administration’’ and all that fol14 lows through ‘‘this chapter’’ and inserting ‘‘shall be 

15 annually transferred, based on requests for pro16 posals, by the Assistant Secretary to nonprofit orga17 nizations that operate airport centers in multiple lo18 cations throughout the United States to provide 

19 places of rest and recuperation for members of the 

20 Armed Forces and their families’’; and 

21 (3) by adding at the end the following new sen22 tence: ‘‘The Assistant Secretary shall ensure that 

23 the name of each nonprofit agency to which funds 

24 are transferred under this subsection is printed in 

25 the Federal Register.’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 1095 RFS

1 (b) ANNUAL REPORT.—Section 515(b) of the De2 partment of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2005 

3 (Public Law 108–334; 118 Stat. 1318; 49 U.S.C. 44945 

4 note) is amended— 

5 (1) by striking ‘‘the Committee on Transpor6 tation and Infrastructure of the House of Represent7 atives’’ and inserting ‘‘the Committee on Homeland 

8 Security of the House of Representatives’’; and 

9 (2) by striking ‘‘and specifically how the un10 claimed money is being used to provide civil aviation 

11 security’’ and inserting ‘‘and the amount of un12 claimed money transferred to nonprofit organiza13 tions under section 44945(a) of title 49, United 

14 States Code, and the dates of such transfers’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 3, 

2013. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Floyd M. CHODOSH, et al., Petitioners, v. PALM BEACH PARK ASSOCIATION

No. 18-9669

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until October 28, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 03/25/14          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      335,826
COMMITMENTS
 109,110  116,314   87,338  117,761  104,074  314,209  307,726   21,617   28,100

CHANGES FROM 03/18/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -799)
   1,249    7,390    2,280   -1,065   -3,799    2,464    5,871   -3,263   -6,670

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    32.5     34.6     26.0     35.1     31.0     93.6     91.6      6.4      8.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      178)
      61       59       77       40       40      141      149
```

----

Updated March 28, 2014
Fernando SANCHEZ, Jr., Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6279

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AVONDALE INCORPORATED FOR THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED MAY 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-30-1997
<CASH>                                           7,950
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   79,543
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,807
<INVENTORY>                                    130,881
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               220,721
<PP&E>                                         444,018
<DEPRECIATION>                                 220,444
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 471,859
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           98,728
<BONDS>                                        263,925
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           133
<OTHER-SE>                                      76,525
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   471,859
<SALES>                                        778,876
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               778,876
<CGS>                                          662,761
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  727,183
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,621
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   927
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,095
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,977
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,040
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,937
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,937
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .89
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BCTC V Assignor Corp. (the "registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer of registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|             |  |                            
|------------ |  | ---------------------------
|Date:        |  |                            
|May 14, 2008 |  | /s/ John P. Manning        
|             |  |                            
|             |  | John P. Manning            
|             |  | Principal Executive Officer
|             |  |                            
|             |  |                            



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1097 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1097

 To direct the Secretary of Transportation to ensure that on-duty time 
  does not include waiting time at a natural gas or oil well site for 
  certain commercial motor vehicle operators, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 12, 2013

 Mr. Mullin (for himself, Mr. Farenthold, Mr. Lucas, Mr. Lankford, Mr. 
 Young of Alaska, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Ribble, Mr. Pearce, Mr. Stivers, Mr. 
  Olson, Mr. Cole, Mr. Southerland, Mr. Bridenstine, Mrs. Lummis, Mr. 
Latta, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. Scalise, Mr. Conaway, Mr. Pompeo, Mr. 
  Gohmert, Mr. Barletta, and Mr. Huelskamp) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of Transportation to ensure that on-duty time 
  does not include waiting time at a natural gas or oil well site for 
  certain commercial motor vehicle operators, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Preserving Jobs in the Oilfield Act 
of 2013''.

SEC. 2. WAITING TIME EXCEPTION.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Transportation shall ensure that 
the exception described in section 395.1(d)(2) of title 49, Code of 
Federal Regulations (relating to on-duty time not including waiting 
time at a natural gas or oil well site) applies to covered operators, 
except that the exception shall apply to such operators without regard 
to whether such operators have received special training or operate 
vehicles specially constructed to service wells.
    (b) Covered Operator Defined.--In this section, the term ``covered 
operator'' means the operator of a commercial motor vehicle 
transporting supplies, equipment, or materials, including sand or 
water, to or from a natural gas or oil well site.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the AnnualReport of Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick J. Moore, Chairman,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   /s/  Patrick J. Moore                            |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   Patrick  J. Moore                                |
|   Chairman,  President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   March 6, 2006                               |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906, has been provided to Smurfit-Stone ContainerCorporation and will be retained by Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Robert SPARKS v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

No. 18-9227 (19A109)

Supreme Court of the United States.

September 25, 2019

The application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice ALITO and by him referred to the Court is denied. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Statement of Justice SOTOMAYOR respecting the denial of certiorari.

The allegations presented in this petition are disturbing. On the day the jury began punishment deliberations in petitioner Robert Sparks' capital murder trial, one of the bailiffs on duty in the courtroom wore a black tie embroidered with a white syringe-a tie that he admitted he wore to express his support for the death penalty.

That an officer of the court conducted himself in such a manner is deeply troubling. Undoubtedly, such "distinctive, identifiable attire may affect a juror's judgment." *Estelle v. Williams* , 425 U.S. 501, 504-505, 96 S.Ct. 1691, 48 L.Ed.2d 126 (1976). The state habeas court, however, conducted an evidentiary hearing but did not find sufficient evidence to conclude that the jury saw the tie. I therefore do not disagree with the denial of certiorari. I nevertheless hope that presiding judges aware of this kind of behavior would see fit to intervene in future cases by completely removing the offending item or court officer from the jury's presence. Only this will ensure the "very dignity and decorum of judicial proceedings" they are entrusted to uphold. *Illinois v. Allen* , 397 U.S. 337, 344, 90 S.Ct. 1057, 25 L.Ed.2d 353 (1970). The stakes-life in this case, liberty in many others-are too high to allow anything less.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          73,866
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,540
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               378,052
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                24,551
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  3,970,504
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           4,051
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             4,089
<LOANS>                                      7,804,655
<ALLOWANCE>                                  (106,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,261,221
<DEPOSITS>                                  11,230,495
<SHORT-TERM>                                   288,113
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            306,081
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           551
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,432,358
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              13,261,221
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                169,434
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               67,500
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,411
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               238,345
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             116,646
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             117,909
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          120,436
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  (5,017)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 261
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 68,234
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 66,395
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      39,671
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    39,671
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.94
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.97
<LOANS-NON>                                    349,614
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             (105,000)
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  (4,153)
<RECOVERIES>                                       135
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            (106,000)
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         (106,000)
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Eric S. NEWTON, Jr., Petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 19-7983.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Cuyahoga County denied.