alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
LAUKA A. CAVAREITA

BOAJID CERTIFIED, CIVIL APPELLATE LAW ^^^^^ ^kl V. 2I0-S88-2901

T1XAS IIOAKD ni HCAL SE'HTALlZAnOS F; 21O-SS8-290S

Cavareita, Katdna Francis, PL1.C onr~

March 12.2015 Ul

., Bexar County Clerk

Bexar County Courthouse

300 Dolorosa

San Antonio, Tx 78205

ATTN: Appeals/Clerk's Record

RE: Cause No. 385685; Theresa Espinoza Bexar County Hospital District d/b/a University Health

System; In llie County Court at Law No. 10. Bexar County, Texas; BCHD 2011 -26; Our File No.

3815-251

Dear Clerk:

On March 12, 2015, Notice of Appeal was filed to perfect an interlocutory appeal of the

Order denying Motion to Dismiss signed by Judge Karen Crouch on February 27. 2015. copy

of the Order which is the subject of the appeal is attached. This appeal is taken lo the Fourth

Court of Appeals.

In connection with this appeal. ask that you prepare Clerk's Record to include the

following documents (and all documents or exhibits attached thereto):

Plaintiffs Original Petition;

Bexar County Hospital District d/b/a University Health System's Special Exceptions and

Original Answer filed on May 24, 2013;

Bexar County Hospital District d/b/a University Health System's Motion to Dismiss accepted for

filing on November 14, 2014;

Plaintiffs Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss filed on December 15. 2014;

Plaintiffs 4590i Section 13.01 (g) Motion filed on December 18.2014;

Order denying Motion to Dismiss signed on February 27, 201 5;

Notice of Appeal;

copy of this Letter.

Please contact my office so that arrangements can be made for payment of any fees

incurred in connection with the preparation and filing of the Clerk's Record. Should you have

any questions, can be reached at 210-588-2901. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely.

SCANNED kD

Date. _.

Laura A. Cavaretla Initials:

xc: Ms. Karen McMurry (via e-mail)

Rick Sarabia via fax 822-4595

One Riverwalk Place 700 N. St. Mary's St., Ste. 1500 San Antonio, Texas 78205
CAUSE NO 385685

2815FEB27 P« 2Jtf

THERESA L. ESPINOZA IN THE COUNTY

VS. AT LAW NUMBER 10

BEXAR COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT

d/b/a UNI\'ERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS

ORDER

On the 18th day of December. 2014 came on to be heard Defendant UNIVERSITY

HEALTH SYSTEM'S Motion to Dismiss. All parries appeared by and through their attorney of

record and the Court, after reviewing the pleadings and hearing argument of counsel is of the

opinion that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss should, in all tilings be denied.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, .ADJUDGED .AND DECREED that the Motion to

Dismiss of Defendant, University Health System is hereby DENIED.

Signed this^ is^ day of fM. 20]5

JUDGE PRESIDING

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CAVARETTA, KATONA& FRANCIS, PLLC

One Riverwalk Place

700 No. St. Mary's Street, Suite 500

San Antonio, Texas 78205

Telephone: (210)588-2901

Facsimile: (210)588-2908

E-Mail: francisr@ckf-lavi.com

RICHARD NrFRSNCIS, .JR.

State Bar No. 07359800
The Law Office of Ed Goldner, PC

616 San Pedro Ave.

San Antonio, Texas 78212

Telephone: (210)923-1234

Facsimile: (210)785-2498

RiC

State Bar
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY
RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 CERTIFICATIONS I, W. Anderson Geater, Jr., certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Origen Financial,
Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):




---



##### 



Page 2  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting. Dated:
August 12, 2005
    
    /s/ W. Anderson Geater, Jr.W. Anderson Geater, Jr.,Chief Financial Officer of OrigenFinancial, Inc.
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION**I, Joseph J. Lodovic, IV, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of MediaNews Group, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: March 30, 2007   /s/Joseph J. Lodovic, IV Joseph J. Lodovic, IV  President
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 120 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 120

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Approving the location of a memorial to commemorate the more than 5,000 
   slaves and free Black persons who fought for independence in the 
                          American Revolution.

Whereas section 8908(b)(1) of title 40, United States Code, provides that the 
        location of a commemorative work in Area I, as depicted on the map 
        entitled ``Commemorative Areas Washington, DC and Environs'',

              

 numbered 869/86501 B, and dated June 24, 2003, shall be deemed to be 
authorized only if a recommendation for that location is approved by law 
not later than 150 calendar days after Congress is notified of the 
recommendation;

Whereas section 2860 of Public Law 112-239 (40 U.S.C. 8903 note) authorized the 
        National Mall Liberty Fund D.C. to establish a memorial on Federal land 
        in Area I or Area II, as depicted on such map, to honor the more than 
        5,000 slaves and free Black persons who fought for American independence 
        in the Revolutionary War; and
Whereas the Administrator of General Services has notified Congress of the 
        Administrator's determination that such memorial should be located in 
        Area I: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the location of a 
commemorative work to honor the more than 5,000 slaves and free Black 
persons who fought in the American Revolution, authorized by section 
2860 of division B of Public Law 112-239 (40 U.S.C. 8903 note), within 
Area I as described on the map entitled ``Commemorative Areas 
Washington, DC and Environs'', numbered 869/86501 B and dated June 24, 
2003, is approved.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 8, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             H. J. RES. 120

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Approving the location of a memorial to commemorate the more than 5,000 
   slaves and free Black persons who fought for independence in the 
                          American Revolution.
```
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 15, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 15, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18I0059. GLENWOOD VILLAGE APARTMENTS OF MACON, LTD. (L.P.), et al. v. DEIDRE ALAVA.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 85731
**GREENPOINTFINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES****Exhibit 11.1Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings**
|                                                                                                               | **Quarter Ended  June 30,** |   | **Six Months Ended  June 30,** |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                                               | ****                        |   | ****                           |   |
|                                                                                                               | **2001**                    |   | **2000**                       |   | **2001** |   | **2000** |   |
|                                                                                                               | ****                        |   | ****                           |   | **** |   | **** |   |
| *(In millions, except  per share amounts)*                                                                         |                        |   |                           |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net income                                                                                                         | $                           | 86.2   |                           | $      | 65.3 |   | $ | 164.3 |   | $ | 123.2 |   |
|                                                                                                               |                             |   |                                |   |  |   |  |   |
| Weighted average number of common shares  outstanding during each year – basic                                | 89.1                        |   | 90.5                           |   | 88.7 |   | 91.0 |   |
| Weighted average number of common shares and  common stock equivalents outstanding during each year – diluted | 91.2                        |   | 91.6                           |   | 90.9 |   | 92.0 |   |
| Basic earnings per share                                                                                           | $                           | 0.97   |                           | $      | 0.72 |   | $ | 1.85 |   | $ | 1.35 |   |
|                                                                                                               |                             |   |                                |   |  |   |  |   |
| Diluted earnings per share                                                                                         | $                           | 0.95   |                           | $      | 0.71 |   | $ | 1.81 |   | $ | 1.34 |   |
|                                                                                                               |                             |   |                                |   |  |   |  |   |
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

SIGNODE INDUSTRIAL GROUP LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAMUEL, SON & CO., LTD. and SAMUEL, SON 

& CO. (USA) INC. d/b/a SAMUEL PACKAGING 

SYSTEMS GROUP and SAMUEL STRAPPING 

SYSTEMS,

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 2:24-cv-00080-JRG

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE

Defendant Samuel, Son & Co., LTD. and Samuel, Son & Co. (USA) Inc. d/b/a Samuel 

Packaging Systems Group and Samuel Strapping Systems hereby notify the Court that pursuant 

to the Court’s June 14, 2024, Docket Control Order [Dkt. No.28] they have served their 

Invalidity Contentions with respect to U.S. Patent No. 11,932,430 on counsel for Plaintiff via

electronic mail on July 24, 2024.

Case 2:24-cv-00080-JRG Document 40 Filed 07/25/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 420
2

Dated: July 25, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Melissa R. Smith

Michael R. Houston (IL Bar No. 6286431) 

Pavan K. Agarwal (D.C. Bar No. 459614)

Tiffany K. Sung (CA Bar No. 323077)

Gabriella M. Salek (IL Bar No. 6342686)

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP

321 North Clark Street, Suite 3000

Chicago, IL 60654

Telephone: (312) 832-4378

Facsimile: (312) 832-4700

Email: mhouston@foley.com

 pagarwal@foley.com

 tsung@foley.com

 gsalek@foley.com

Melissa R. Smith

State Bar No. 24001351

GILLAM & SMITH, LLP

303 South Washington Avenue

Marshall, Texas 75670

Telephone: (903) 934-8450

Facsimile: (903) 934-9257

Email: melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com

Attorney for Defendants 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned counsel hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and 

foregoing document has been served via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) 

upon all counsel of record on July 25, 2024. 

________________________

Melissa R. Smith

/s/ Melissa R. Smith

Case 2:24-cv-00080-JRG Document 40 Filed 07/25/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 421
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Wireless Holdings, Inc., for the Quarter ended September 30, 2005, I, Joseph Hess, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Wireless Holdings, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 

 
| 1.     | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
| 2.     | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Wireless Holdings, Inc. |

 

 
| By:    | */s/*   *Joseph Hess*

Joseph HessChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Dated: November 14, 2005
IN THE UNITED ST A TES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

SIGNODE INDUSTRIAL GROUP LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

V. Case No. 2:24-CV-00080-JRG 

SAMUEL, SON & CO., LTD., ET AL. 

Defendants. 

DECLARATION OF ANDREAS KELLER IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF SIGNODE 

INDUSTRIAL GROUP LLC'S OPPOSITION TO 

SAMUEL'S MOTION TO TRANSFER PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) 

I, Andreas Keller, declare as follows: 

1. I am a Team Leader at Signode Switzerland GmbH and lead the product 

development efforts relating to Signode Industrial Group LLC's ("Signode") battery-operated 

plastic strapping tools, such as the BXT4. 

2. Signode's battery-operated combination plastic strapping tools have been designed, 

developed, and manufactured at Signode Switzerland GmbH's Dietikon, Switzerland facility for 

at least the past 20 years. 

3. While Signode has increased its use of cloud-based storage such as MS-Teams or 

SharePoint over the last few years, the majority of the documents relating to the design, 

development, and manufacture of Signode's battery-operated plastic strapping tools are located on 

a Signode server in Dietikon, Switzerland. Similarly, all CAD data relating to Signode's batteryoperated plastic strapping tools is stored locally in Dietikon, Switzerland. 

Case 2:24-cv-00080-JRG Document 46-1 Filed 09/04/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 812
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the following is true and 

correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. 

Executed this 4°" day of September, in Dietikon, Swit:z,,rlan~ 

cc 

Andreas Keller 

2 

Case 2:24-cv-00080-JRG Document 46-1 Filed 09/04/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 813
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:
November 8, 2007
    
    By
    
    /s/ Cary L. DeaconCary L. DeaconPresident and Chief Executive Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DEMING ZENG, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 13-73504 

Agency No. A089-782-013 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 26, 2017**

Before: PAEZ, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Deming Zeng, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of 

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of 

removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUL 7 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 13-73504 

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the 

agency’s factual findings, Silaya v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th Cir. 2008). 

We deny in part and grant in part the petition for review, and we remand.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s denial of Zeng’s CAT claim 

because Zeng failed to establish it is more likely than not he would be tortured by 

or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to China. See id.

at 1073.

The BIA found Zeng’s asylum claim failed because he did not establish that 

a political opinion was or would be at least “one central reason” for his 

mistreatment by Chinese authorities. The BIA further found that because Zeng

failed to establish eligibility for asylum, he did not meet the higher standard of 

proof for withholding of removal. 

As to asylum, substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination. See 

Dinu v. Ashcroft, 372 F.3d 1041, 1043-45 (9th Cir. 2004) (concluding that heavyhanded tactics used by police during an investigation for legitimate purposes was 

not persecution on account of a protected ground).

As to withholding of removal, the BIA did not have the benefit of this 

court’s decision in Barajas-Romero v. Lynch, 846 F.3d 351, 356-60 (9th Cir. 2017)

when it issued its order. Thus, we grant the petition for review and remand Zeng’s 

withholding of removal claim to the BIA to determine the impact of this decision. 
3 13-73504 

See INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-18 (2002) (per curiam).

Each party shall bear its own costs for this petition for review.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; GRANTED in part; 

REMANDED.