alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018324EN.01000102.xml

| 13.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 324/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 324/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8990 — PIAG/MTIB/Abatec)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 324/02)

On 24 August 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8990. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8990. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of operations
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such consolidated financial
statements together with the related footnotes thereto.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000911082
<NAME>                                         Sam Houston Race Park, Ltd.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jul-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         7,002
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  814
<ALLOWANCES>                                   51
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               12,399
<PP&E>                                         28,992
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,804
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 37,587
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7,050
<BONDS>                                        47,931
<COMMON>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (20,998)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   37,587
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6,833
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  6,837
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,443
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,351)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,351)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,351)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
Darius KINNEY, Petitioner v. OHIO

No. 18-9736

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

*376Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Cuyahoga County denied.
Eugene WILLIAMS, Petitioner v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections

No. 19-6244

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

Assigned on Briefs September 27, 2005

TYRONE D. CONLEY v. HOWARD CARLTON, WARDEN

Appeal from the Criminal Court for Johnson County

No. 4497 Lynn W. Brown, Judge

No. E2005-00049-CCA-R3-HC - Filed November 2, 2005

JOSEPH M. TIPTON, J., concurring.

I concur in the result reached in the majority opinion. However, I do so on the merits, as

opposed to the petitioner’s failure to follow procedural requirements for habeas corpus petitions. 

The majority opinion cites Hickman v. State, 153 S.W.3d 15, 19-20 (Tenn. 2004), in stating

that the procedural requirements are mandatory and must be scrupulously honored. However, our

supreme court also noted in Hickman that the trial court “may instead choose to afford the petitioner

an opportunity to comply with the procedural requirements, or the habeas corpus court may choose

to adjudicate the petition on its merits.” Id. at 21.

In the present case, although one of the arguments made by the state dealt with the petition’s

procedural deficiencies, I view the state’s motion and the trial court’s dismissal order to focus on the

merits of the petition. That is, the specific issue addressed in them dealt with whether the petition

supported a finding that the petitioner’s conviction was void or that his sentence had expired. In this

regard, when the trial court chose to resolve the habeas corpus petition on the merits, without

concern for procedural deficiencies or for the opportunity to correct such deficiencies, we should not

then rely on the deficiencies to defeat an appeal. 

The petitioner’s central claim is that the trial court did not have jurisdiction to amend his

second degree murder judgment by removing the thirty percent release eligibility and imposing

service of one hundred percent of the sentence. Pursuant to T.C.A. § 40-35-501(i) a sentence for

second degree murder requires service of the sentence without parole, allowing only for sentence

credits for fifteen percent of the sentence. The trial court’s imposition of a thirty percent release

eligibility date was in direct contravention of law, subject to correction at any time. See Moody v.
-2-

State, 160 S.W.3d 512, 515-16 (Tenn. 2005) (citing State v. Burkhart, 566 S.W.2d 871, 873 (Tenn.

1978)). I conclude that the petition has no merit.

____________________________________

JOSEPH M. TIPTON, JUDGE
| 1. | Such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September      30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for      the period ending September 30, 2008, fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations      of BTX Holdings, Inc. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      October 22, 2008                                                                       |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                              |
| /s/ Scott      J. Silverman                                                                       |
| Scott      J. SilvermanPresident,      Chief      Executive Officer, Chief      Financial Officer |
AO 399 (01/09) Waiver of the Service of Summons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To:

(Name of the plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint,

two copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you. 

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case. 

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service. 

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within

60 days from , the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the

United States). If I fail to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date:

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

Printed name of party waiving service of summons Printed name

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a summons

and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff located in

the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure.

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the plaintiff

and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been served.

 Eastern District of Texas

BOND

FOLSOM INSURANCE AGENCY LLC, et. al.

1:24-cv-00634

Anthony Paronich

05/09/2024

06/05/2024

Cody Folsom Bety Javidzad

601 S Figueroa St # 2500 

Los Angeles, CA 90017

bety.javidzad@dentons.com

(213) 243-6115

Case 1:24-cv-00075-MJT Document 7 Filed 06/05/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 34
Crystal BITON, Petitioner v. UNITED AIRLINES, et al.

No. 19-5863

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 12, 2019

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Emilio MEDINA-RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8255.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

** **

** **

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

** **

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as ofOctober 1, 2017, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVINGCORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as MasterServicer, AEGON USA REALTY ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTONTRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee and WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian  with respect to DBUBS 2017-BRBK Mortgage Trust Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms usedherein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuantto Section 11.07 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice Presidentof Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from October1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”),  and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and 

 

2.       Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2018.

 

 

/s/Daniel Bober

DanielBober

ExecutiveVice President 

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo)  Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
John M. BARONE, petitioner, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

No. 18-1392.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 23, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Billy John ROBERSON, Petitioner v. ROWLETT POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al.;

No. 19-5199

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AVONDALE INCORPORATED FOR THE THIRTEEN
WEEKS ENDED NOVEMBER 28, 1997 AND NOVEMBER 29, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-28-1998             AUG-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-28-1997             NOV-29-1996
<CASH>                                           8,644                   9,073
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,441                  86,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,804                   5,069
<INVENTORY>                                    137,267                 137,368
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               211,917                 234,247
<PP&E>                                         478,060                 434,919
<DEPRECIATION>                                 240,033                 200,918
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 473,869                 488,250
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           92,002                  93,577
<BONDS>                                        255,735                 299,775
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           133                     133
<OTHER-SE>                                      93,520                  67,620
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   473,869                 488,250
<SALES>                                        268,789                 254,064
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               268,789                 254,064
<CGS>                                          225,293                 218,303
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  246,980                 240,052
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,776                   5,559
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   327                     369
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,670                   6,498
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,363                   1,955
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,745                     784
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,618                   1,171
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,618                   1,171
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .65                     .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .64                     .09
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Clive Barwin, certify that:

1.            I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Melt Inc.;

2.            Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.            Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.             I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and I have:

a)             designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)            evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c)             disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

5.             I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)             all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)            any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Dated:  May 10, 2007

 

 

/s/ Clive Barwin                                                                            

Clive Barwin, President, CEO and Secretary 

(Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 31.b

I, Marc N. Teal, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BCTC V Assignor Corp. (the "Assignor");
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|May 15, 2007 | /s/ Marc N. Teal                                    
|------------ | ----------------------------------------------------
|             | Marc N. Teal                                        
|             | (Principal Financial Officer), BCTC V Assignor Corp.
|             |