alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018366EN.01001601.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 10.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 366/16 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9115 — BC Partners/VetPartners)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 366/08)

1.

On 2 October 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018366EN.01001601-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | BC Partners LLP (United Kingdom) (‘BC Partners’), and |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | VetPartners Group Limited (United Kingdom) (‘VetPartners’) |

BC Partners, through its wholly controlled fund BC European Capital X Fund, acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation (indirect) sole control of the whole of VetPartners.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | BC Partners is an international private equity firm with headquarters in London with investments in a diverse range of sectors, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | VetPartners is a veterinary practice group. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018366EN.01001601-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9115 — BC Partners/VetPartners

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| E-mail: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018366EN.01001601-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018366EN.01001601-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
----

|    |                                                                                                 |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cabela's Incorporated; |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
| Dated: | May 5, 2014 | /s/ Ralph W. Castner |
|   |   | Ralph W. CastnerExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Myron Gregory JESSIE, Petitioner, v. MICHIGAN.

No. 18-9740

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
XIAO-YING YU, Petitioner v. Robert R. NEALL, Secretary, Maryland Department of Health, et al.

No. 19-262

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 21, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
BUCHWALD CAPITAL ADVISORS LLC v. SAULT STE. MARIE TRIBE, et al.

No. 18-1218. R46-015 / OT 2019

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 2, 2020

The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed on April 2, 2020, pursuant to Rule 46.1 of the Rules of this Court.
**OFFICE OF**  **THE AlTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN**  

## falm+t.13, 1939 tilttab to nwlre the for8 rarm4 in raaordanw with
Charles A. DAVIS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA.

No. 18-9376

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 07, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Frank JEFFS, Petitioner v. Michael OVERMYER, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Forest, et al.

No. 19-6029

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District denied.
ISAACSON/WEAVER FAMILY TRUST, Petitioner v. FRESNO COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION, et al.

No. 19-244

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC.
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(CHAPTER 98, TITLE 15 U.S.C. SS. 7241)

I,
Steven J. Janusek, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13(a)-15(f) and
15(d)-15(f)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



Date:
August 7, 2008

/s/STEVEN J. JANUSEKSteven J. Janusek, Chief Financial Officer


---
Order issued July 10, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 14

- 00182

- CR

TRAVIS LEE ANDERSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12

- 50734

- J



### ORDER

Before Justices Lang, Brown, and Whitehill

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we GRANT the August 8, 2014 motion of

Nanette Hendrickson for leave to withdraw as appointed counsel on appeal. We DIRECT the

Clerk of the Cour t to remove Nanette Hendrickson as counsel of record for a ppellant. We

DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order and all future correspondence to

Travis Lee Anderson, TDCJ No. 10906055, Tulia Transfer Facility, 4000 Hwy 86 West, Tulia,

Texas 79088.

/Ada Brown/

ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BCTC V Assignor Corp. (the "registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|             |  |                            
|------------ |  | ---------------------------
|Date:        |  |                            
|May 15, 2009 |  | /s/ John P. Manning        
|             |  |                            
|             |  | John P. Manning            
|             |  | Principal Executive Officer
|             |  |                            
|             |  |                            



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/01/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       53,975
COMMITMENTS
   1,077    7,089    2,035   50,858   44,668   53,970   53,792        5      183

CHANGES FROM 03/25/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -23,510)
    -156   -2,228     -838  -22,491  -20,386  -23,485  -23,452      -25      -58

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     2.0     13.1      3.8     94.2     82.8    100.0     99.7      0.0      0.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       32)
       2        8        5       15       16       21       26`

---

Updated April 4, 2014
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 28, 2009 

0420 

Order 

 

April 28, 2009 

138087 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138087 

 COA: 278073 

Wayne CC: 06-012922-01 

CENACA BRANDON WILLIS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 11, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Marcos SANTIAGO, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5928

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY
RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 CERTIFICATIONS I, Ronald A. Klein, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Origen Financial,
Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the




---



##### 



Page 2 audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Dated: June 18, 2004
    
    /s/ Ronald A. KleinRonald A. Klein,Chief Executive Officer of Origen Financial, Inc.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 111 (Thursday, June 9, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 35214]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12447]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE


Request for Nominations for the Physician-Focused Payment Model 
Technical Advisory Committee

AGENCY: U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO).

ACTION: Request for letters of nomination and resumes.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 
established the Physician-Focused Payment Model Technical Advisory 
Committee (PTAC) to provide comments and recommendations to the 
Secretary of Health and Human Services on physician payment models and 
gave the Comptroller General responsibility for appointing its members. 
GAO is now accepting nominations of individuals for this committee.

DATES: Letters of nomination and resumes should be submitted no later 
than July 11, 2022, to ensure adequate opportunity for review and 
consideration of nominees prior to appointment. Appointments will be 
made in October 2022.

ADDRESSES: Submit letters of nomination and resumes to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#beeeeafffdddd1d3d3d7cacadbdbfed9dfd190d9d1c8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5f0f0b1e1c3c303232362b2b3a3a1f383e3071383029">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg Giusto at (202) 512-8268 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e2858b9791968d85a285838dcc858d94"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6c0b05191f18030b2c0b0d03420b031a">[email protected]</span></a> if you do not receive an acknowledgement within a week 
of submission or you need additional information. For general 
information, contact GAO's Office of Public Affairs at (202) 512-4800.
    Authority: Sec. 101(e), Public Law 114-10, 129 Stat. 87, 115 
(2015).

Gene L. Dodaro,
Comptroller General of the United States.
[FR Doc. 2022-12447 Filed 6-8-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the ____________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No. 2:24-cv-00020

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

1/12/2024

Case 2:24-cv-00020-JRG Document 5 Filed 01/12/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 27
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) . I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

Other (specify):

. My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 2:24-cv-00020-JRG Document 5 Filed 01/12/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 28
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

STATE OF WASHINGTON,

Respondent,

V.

BOBBY D. COLBERT,

Appellant.

No. 76714-3

DIVISION ONE

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

FILED: April 16, 2018

C)

es-1 CA 0

C=1 --4

c0 7.2:047

I-rtC7

(-11

./.%

rt't

(.9) rn

231"

Crt

PER CURIAM. Bobby Colbert appeals superior court orders denying his request

to be transported for a hearing and correcting a scrivener's error in his judgment and

sentence. Colbert's court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw on the

ground that there is no basis for a good faith argument on review. Pursuant to State

v. Theobald,78 Wn.2d 184, 470 P.2d 188 (1970), and Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967), the motion to withdraw must

[1] be accompanied by a brief referring to anything in the record that

might arguably support the appeal. [2] A copy of counsel's brief should

be furnished the indigent and [3] time allowed him to raise any points

that he chooses; [4] the court--not counsel--then proceeds, after a full

examination of all the proceedings, to decide whether the case is wholly

frivolous.

Theobald,78 Wn.2d at 185 (quoting Anders,386 U.S. at 744).

This procedure has been followed. Colbert's counsel on appeal filed a brief with

the motion to withdraw. Colbert was served with a copy of the brief and informed of
No. 76714-3-1/2

his right to file a statement of additional grounds for review. He filed a pro se statement

of additional grounds.

The facts are accurately set forth in counsel's brief in support of the motion to

withdraw. The court has reviewed the briefs filed in this court and has independently

reviewed the entire record. The court specifically considered the following potential

issues raised by counsel:

1. Did the trial court err in treating an erroneous maximum sentence on

the face of Colbert's judgment and sentence as a scrivener's error?

2. Did the trial court err in addressing the scrivener's error without Colbert

being present?

The court also considered issues raised by Colbert in his statement of additional

grounds:

1. Was the information fatally defective for failing to state all the essential

elements of the offense?

2. Is Colbert entitled to a new trial under State v. W.R., 181 Wn.2d 757,

336 P.3d 1134 (2014) when that case is not retroactive, In re Colbert,

186 Wn.2d 614,380 P.2d 504 (2016), Colbert's direct appeal has long

since been mandated, and the current appeal is from the correction

of a scrivener's error?

The potential issues are wholly frivolous. Colbert's motion for new counsel and

supplemental briefing is denied. Counsel's motion to withdraw is granted. The

2
No. 76714-3-1/3

challenged orders are affirmed.

3

For the Court: