alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Salomon Brothers Variable Series Funds Inc

                                                            (2)


               Report of Independent Accountants


To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Salomon Brothers Variable Series Funds Inc


In planning and performing our audit of the financial
statements of Salomon Brothers Variable Strategic Bond Fund
(one of the portfolios constituting Salomon Brothers Variable
Series Funds Inc, hereafter referred to as the Fund) for the
year ended December 31, 2002, we considered its internal
control, including control activities for safeguarding
securities, in order to determine our auditing procedures for
the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial
statements and to comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR,
not to provide assurance on internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this
responsibility, estimates and judgments by management are
required to assess the expected benefits and related costs of
controls.  Generally, controls that are relevant to an audit
pertain to the entity's objective of preparing financial
statements for external purposes that are fairly presented in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
Those controls include the safeguarding of assets against
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or
fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any
evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to
the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes
in conditions or that the effectiveness of their design and
operation may deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in internal control that might be material
weaknesses under standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness
is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more
of the internal control components does not reduce to a
relatively low level the risk that misstatements caused by
error or fraud in amounts that would be material in relation to
the financial statements being audited may occur and not be
detected within a timely period by employees in the normal
course of performing their assigned functions.  However, we
noted no matters involving internal control and its operation,
including controls for safeguarding securities, that we
consider to be material weaknesses as defined above as of
December 31, 2002.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management and the Board of Directors of the Fund and the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not intended to be
and should not be used by anyone other than these specified
parties.




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

February 24, 2003
# C_2018077EN.01000101.xml

| 1.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 77/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 77/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8803 — Michelin/Sumitomo/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 77/01)

On 23 February 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8803. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8803. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BCTC V Assignor Corp. (the "registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|                  |  |                            
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:             |  |                            
|November 14, 2006 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  | Marc N. Teal               
|                  |  | Principal Financial Officer
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  |                            

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 23.1

kpmg



KPMG LLP



Chartered Accountants

Telephone

(416) 228-7000

Yonge Corporate Centre

Telefax

(416) 228-7123

4100 Yonge Street Suite 200

www.kpmg.ca

North York ON M2P 2H3

Canada







Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





The Board of Directors

Diversinet Corp.



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-144167) on Form S-8, the registration statement (No. 333-146608) on Form F-3 (which was amended by the aforementioned registration statement on Form F-1/A), the registration statement (No. 333-146608) on Form F-3/A, the registration statement (No. 333-148003) on Form S-8, the registration statement (No. 333-136181) on Form F-3/A, the registration statement (No. 333-128975) on Form F-1/A, the registration statement (No. 333-122284) on Form F-1/A, the registration statement (No. 333-122284) on Form F-3 (which was amended by the aforementioned registration statement on Form F-1/A), the registration statement (No. 333-113646) on Form F-3, the registration statement (No. 333-107251) on Form F-3, the registration statement (No. 333-136178) on Form S-8, the registration statement (No. 333-125085) on Form S-8, the registration statement (No. 333-114674) on Form S-8 and the registration statement (No. 333-103356) on Form S-8 of Diversinet Corp. of our report dated March 4, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Diversinet Corp. as at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of net income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss), consolidated statements of shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2010 which report appears in the December 31, 2010, Annual Report on Form 20-F of Diversinet Corp.



/s/ KPMG LLP

Toronto, Canada

March 3, 2011
Lazaro CANDELARIA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8312.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 09/09/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      425,310
COMMITMENTS
 144,728  171,978  105,194  151,578  114,250  401,500  391,422   23,810   33,888

CHANGES FROM 09/02/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     15,932)
  12,280   10,417      799    3,068    5,081   16,147   16,297     -215     -365

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    34.0     40.4     24.7     35.6     26.9     94.4     92.0      5.6      8.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      202)
      67       76       85       39       40      155      164
```

----

Updated September 12, 2014
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § Case No. 2:24-CR-0004 JRG-RSP

§

RANDY RASHAD EVANS §

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE=S REPORT AND

FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY

On this day, the Court considered the Findings of Fact and Recommendation of United 

States Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne regarding defendant=s plea of guilty to Count 1 of an 

indictment charging defendant with a violation of 18 U.S.C. ' 844(e), threat to real or personal 

property by means of fire or an explosive. Having conducted a proceeding in the form and manner 

prescribed by FED. R. CRIM P. 11, the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court accept the 

defendant=s guilty plea. The parties waived their right to file objections to the Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation. The Court is of the opinion that the Findings of Fact and Recommendation 

should be accepted.

It is accordingly ORDERED that the Findings of Fact and Recommendation of the United 

States Magistrate Judge, filed October 2, 2024, are hereby ADOPTED.

It is further ORDERED that, pursuant to defendant=s plea agreement, the Court finds 

defendant GUILTY of Count 1 of the indictment in the above-numbered cause.

So Ordered this

Oct 22, 2024

Case 2:24-cr-00004-JRG-RSP Document 34 Filed 10/23/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 92
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 98-1131NI

_____________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Northern

v. * District of Iowa.

*

Kevin Leon Bassham, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

_____________

 Submitted: June 9, 1998

Filed: June 15, 1998

_____________

Before FAGG, BRIGHT, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Kevin Leon Bassham appeals his bank robbery and firearms convictions and the

sentence imposed by the district court. First, finding no error, plain or otherwise, we

reject Bassham's contentions related to the admissibility of the Government's evidence

about Bassham's drug activity. Second, we disagree with Bassham's contention that

his past criminal record does not qualify him for sentencing as a career offender. The

district court correctly found that Bassham's earlier convictions for attempted burglary

and stalking were crimes of violence for career offender sentencing under the

guidelines. Having rejected Bassham's arguments, we also conclude an extended
-2-

opinion by this court would have no precedential value. We thus affirm Bassham's

convictions and sentence without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of First National Bankshares of Florida, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, Gary L. Tice, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Robert T. Reichert, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|    |  |                                                           
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Gary L. Tice                                          
|    |  | Gary L. Tice                                              
|    |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                      
|    |  | May 10, 2003                                              
|    | 
|    |  | /s/ Robert T. Reichert                                    
|    |  | Robert T. Reichert                                        
|    |  | Senior Vice President,Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer
|    |  | May 10, 2003
Stephen Jason WHITAKER, Petitioner v. Jeff PREMO, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary

No. 19-5675

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Samuel KWUSHUE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-1245.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 26, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 1 A0 44 4

. M I C HAEL PETI T v . TI D EW ATER CREDI T SERVI CES, LLC et

a l

.

Defen d an t M ich ael Pet i t ap p eal s t h e s t at e co u rt ’ s o rd er g ran ti n g t h e p l ai n t i ff’ s

m o ti o n fo r s u m

m ary ju d g m e n t an d award i n g t h e p l ai n t i ff $ 2 ,6 0 4.4 4 i n d am ag es , $ 2 9 4

. 1 4 i n p re-ju d g m en t i n t eres t , $ 3 1 4.8 6 i n at t o rn ey fees
, an d co u rt co st s i n t h i s

co n tract act i on . W e l ack ju ri sd i ct i o n

.

“ Al t h ou g h t h e g ran t of a m ot i on fo r s u m m ary ju d g m en t i s i n g en eral d i rect l y
ap p eal ab l e, wh ere t he am o u n t of t h e ju d g m en t i s $ 1 0 ,0 00 o r les s , an ap p li cat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary ap peal i s req u i r e d .” Ca -S h a r , In c. v. M

cKes s o n Co r

p

. , 2 0 4 Ga. Ap p. 8 6 5
, 8 6 5 (4 2 0 SE2 d 8 1 0 ) (1 9 92 ) (p u n ct u at i o n om i t t ed ); s ee al so OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (6 ), (b ). As t h e t o t al ju d g m en t i n fav o r o f th e p l ai n ti ff i s fo r l es s t h an $ 1 0 ,0 0 0
, t h e

en t ry o f s u m

m ary j ud gm en t p ro v i d es n o bas i s fo r a di rect ap p eal i n t h is cas e. See Ca

S h a r , In c. , 2 04 Ga. Ap p

. at 8 6 5 -8 6 6

. “ Co m pl ian ce wi t h t h e d is cret i o n ary ap p eal s
p ro ced ure i s ju ri s di ct i o n al

. ” S mo a k v. Dep t. o

f Hu ma n Res o u r ces , 2 21 G a. Ap p

. 2 5 7,
2 5 7 (4 71 SE2 d 6 0 ) (1 9 9 6 ). October 07, 2020P e t i t ’ s fai l u re t o co m p ly wi t h t h e d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal pro ced u re d ep ri v es u s

o f ju ri s d i ct i o n o v er t h i s di rect ap p eal
, wh i ch i s h ereb y DISM ISSED. See Jen n i n g s v. Mo s s , 2 3 5 Ga. Ap p

. 3 5 7 , 3 5 7 (5 0 9 SE2 d 6 5 5 ) (1 9 9 8 ).

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y th a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 10/07/2020
# C_2018325EN.01000201.xml

| 14.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 325/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 325/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9065 — Akastor/Mitsui & Co/Mitsui OSK Lines/AKOFS Offshore)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 325/02)

On 7 September 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9065. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9065. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

JACK IN THE BOX INC.

 Defendant

CASE NO. 2:24-cv-00052-JRG-RSP

 (Lead Case)

ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

ZAXBY’S FRANCHISING LLC,

 Defendant

CASE NO. 2:24-cv-00056-JRG-RSP

 (Consolidated Case)

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DISCOVERY ORDER

Plaintiff Display Technologies, LLC, files this Unopposed Motion for Entry of this 

Discovery Order. The Parties have conferred and agreed upon this Discovery Order. Therefore, 

Display Technologies, LLC respectfully requests that the Court approve and enter same, a copy of 

which is attached hereto for the Court’s entry.

Case 2:24-cv-00052-JRG-RSP Document 20 Filed 06/17/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 87
- 2 -

Dated: June 17, 2024 Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Randall T. Garteiser

Randall T. Garteiser

 Texas Bar No. 24038912

 rgarteiser@ghiplaw.com

GARTEISER HONEA, PLLC

119 W. Ferguson Street

Tyler, Texas 75702

Telephone: (903) 705-7420

Facsimile: (903) 405-3999

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF

Case 2:24-cv-00052-JRG-RSP Document 20 Filed 06/17/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 88
- 3 -

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

The undersigned hereby certifies that the parties met and conferred and agreed to the 

Joint Proposed Order. 

/s/ Randall T. Garteiser 

Randall T. Garteiser

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document has been served on all counsel of record via the Court’s ECF system. 

/s/ Randall T. Garteiser 

Randall T. Garteiser

Case 2:24-cv-00052-JRG-RSP Document 20 Filed 06/17/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 89
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018255EN.01001901.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 20.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/19 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9022 — Watling Street Capital Partners/Sisaho International)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 255/08)

1.

On 13 July 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018255EN.01001901-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Watling Street Capital Partners LLP (‘Watling Street’, United Kingdom), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Sisaho International SAS (‘Sisaho’, France). |

Watling Street acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Sisaho.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of securities.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Watling Street: equity capital and fund management services,

—   for Sisaho: insurance brokerage and consulting, insurance contract management and corporate risk management services.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018255EN.01001901-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9022 — Watling Street Capital Partners/Sisaho International

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| E-mail: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018255EN.01001901-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018255EN.01001901-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---