alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                          17,457
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,861
<ALLOWANCES>                                       514
<INVENTORY>                                     28,937
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                71,854
<PP&E>                                          74,618
<DEPRECIATION>                                  38,801
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 114,273
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,065
<BONDS>                                        155,088
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (70,159)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   114,273
<SALES>                                         45,786
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,786
<CGS>                                           27,300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,208
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,597
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,227
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,351
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,876
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,876
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Louis MERCADO, Petitioner v. Jacob SOREY, Warden, et al.

No. 19-5441

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District denied.
Brandon ERWIN, petitioner, v. FCI COLEMAN-LOW, WARDEN.

No. 18-7581.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 23, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
EX-32.1
        CERTIFICATION OF CEO
 **EXHIBIT
        32.1**
  **SARBANES-OXLEY
        SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**
  In
        connection with the quarterly report of Modern City Entertainment Inc. (the
        “Company”) on Form l0-QSB for the three months ended September 30, 2006, William
        Erfurth, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director hereby certifies,
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
        of the SARBANES - OXLEY Act of 2002, that to the best of his
        knowledge:
  1.
        The
        quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and
  2.
        The
        information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.
  Date:
                  August 14,
                  2007
              By:
              /s/ William
                ErfurthWilliam
                ErfurthPresident,
                CEO
                & Director
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

THE RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR 

THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW 

YORK; UNIVERSITY OF 

CONNECTICUT; and WORCESTER 

POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.; 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, 

INC.; SAMSUNG AUSTIN 

SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC; SAMSUNG 

SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.,

Defendants.

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2-23-CV-000141-RWS-RSP

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO 

SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(a)(i), Plaintiffs The Research Foundation 

for The State University of New York, University of Connecticut, and Worcester Polytechnic Institute 

(collectively, “Plaintiffs” and/or “the Universities”) hereby dismiss without prejudice all claims against

Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC in the above captioned case. 

This notice is properly filed pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(a)(i) before Samsung Austin

Semiconductor, LLC serves an answer or a motion for summary judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 

41(a)(1)(A)(i). This notice dismisses only Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC and has no effect on 

the remaining defendants in this case. 

Case 2:23-cv-00141-RWS-RSP Document 29 Filed 08/30/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 697
2 

Accordingly, the Universities request this Court enter an Order acknowledging this Notice of 

dismissal and dismissing without prejudice all claims asserted in this case by Plaintiffs against Samsung 

Austin Semiconductor, LLC, with both sides to bear their own costs and fees. 

DATED: August 30, 2023 /s/ Michael A. Siem by permission Claire Abernathy Henry

Michael A. Siem – LEAD ATTORNEY

(pro hac vice forthcoming) 

Emilio F. Grillo

(pro hac vice forthcoming) 

Cedric Tan

(pro hac vice forthcoming) 

Chiara M. Carni

(pro hac vice forthcoming) 

GOLDBERG SEGALLA LLP

711 Third Avenue, Suite 1900

New York, New York 10017

Telephone: (646) 292-8700

msiem@goldbergsegalla.com

egrillo@goldbergsegalla.com

ctan@goldbergsegall.com

cmcarni@goldbergsegalla.com

 

Of Counsel: 

 

Claire Abernathy Henry

TX Bar No. 24053063

Andrea L. Fair

TX Bar No. 24078488

WARD, SMITH & HILL, PLLC

PO Box 1231

Longview, Texas 75606-1231

Telephone: (903) 757-6400

Facsimile: (903) 757-2323

claire@wsfirm.com

andrea@wsfirm.com

 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS 

 

Case 2:23-cv-00141-RWS-RSP Document 29 Filed 08/30/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 698
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served on all counsel of record 

by email on this 30th day of August, 2023.

 /s/ Claire Abernathy Henry

Claire Abernathy Henry

Case 2:23-cv-00141-RWS-RSP Document 29 Filed 08/30/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 699
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/01/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      357,046
COMMITMENTS
 114,839  145,412   87,429  137,941   99,972  340,209  332,813   16,837   24,233

CHANGES FROM 03/25/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     21,220)
   5,729   29,098       91   20,180   -4,102   26,000   25,087   -4,780   -3,867

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    32.2     40.7     24.5     38.6     28.0     95.3     93.2      4.7      6.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      189)
      64       66       69       40       40      139      151
```

----

Updated April 4, 2014
Glenn Sinatra DAVIS, Petitioner, v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR SPECIALTY UNDERWRITING AND RESIDENTIAL FINANCE TRUST, SERIES 2005-BC3.

No. 19-7992.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama denied.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or coll ateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### MAY 25 2000 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk 

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. NELSON BEGAY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 99-4153 (D.C. No. 99-CV-123) (Utah)



### ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before SEYMOUR , Chief Judge, EBEL , and BRISCOE , Circuit Judges. After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materiallyassist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). Th e cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Nelson Begay brought this action under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 attacking a district court order dated October 2, 1998, which r evoked his supervised release and sentenced him to nine months incarceration to b e followed by twenty-seven-2-

months of supervised release. The district court d ismissed the section 2255 proceeding on the ground that Mr. Begay had not bro ught a direct appeal of the above order and had failed to show cause for his fa ilure to do so. Mr. Begay appeals. The order denying Mr. Begay’s section 2255 petitionwas filed July 13, 1999. On October 21, 1999, the district court ente red an order finding excusable neglect for Mr. Begay’s failure to file a timely ap peal under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(b) of the October 2, 1998 ord er resentencing him after revocation of his supervised release. We have on this date issued an order and judgment in the appeal from the resentencing in whi ch we affirm the sentence imposed by the district court on the basis of the S upreme Court’s opinion in Johnson v. United States , No. 99-5153, 2000 WL 574359 (U.S. May 15, 2000). See United States v. Begay , No. 98-4195, 2000 WL (10th Cir. ). Our decision in that case rejecting the same argume nt Mr. Begay makes here renders this proceeding moot. Accordingly, we DISMISS this appeal. ENTERED FOR THE COURT Stephanie K. Seymour Chief Judge
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 111 (Thursday, June 9, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 35250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12388]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Parcel Select Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: June 9, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
May 31, 2022, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Parcel Select Contract 49 to Competitive Product List. 
Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2022-63, CP2022-
69.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2022-12388 Filed 6-8-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TEXARKANA DIVISION

OPTIMORPHIX, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., 

Defendant. 

Civil Action No. 5:23-cv-126-RWS-JBB

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

OPTIMORPHIX, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

AMAZON.COM, INC. AND AMAZON WEB

SERVICES, INC., 

Defendants. 

Civil Action No. 5:23-cv-123-RWS-JBB

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

OPTIMORPHIX, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

CA, INC., 

Defendant. 

Civil Action No. 5:23-cv-134-RWS-JBB

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

OPTIMORPHIX, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

F5, INC. 

Defendant. 

Civil Action No. 5:24-cv-26-RWS-JBB

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Case 5:23-cv-00134-RWS-JBB Document 43 Filed 06/03/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 613
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO CONTINUE STAY

Before the Court is the Parties’ Joint Motion to Continue the Stays Pending 

Settlement in the above-captioned cases. The Court is of the opinion the motion should be 

GRANTED. It is 

ORDERED that the above-captioned actions shall remain stayed until June 24, 2024, at 

which time all Parties to the above-captioned actions will be in a position to either file all papers 

necessary for the closing of the above-captioned cases and the removal of these cases from the 

Court’s active docket, or alternatively, file a Joint Notice requesting the resetting of a 

consolidated Scheduling Conference in the above-captioned cases. 

2

.

____________________________________

J. Boone Baxter

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

SIGNED this the 3rd day of June, 2024.

Case 5:23-cv-00134-RWS-JBB Document 43 Filed 06/03/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 614
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 Eastern District of Texas VIRTAMOVE, CORP. HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY 2:24-cv-00093-JRG VIRTAMOVE, CORP. 04/16/2024 /s/ James S. Tsuei James S. Tsuei, CA SBN 285530

Russ August & Kabat 

12424 Wilshire Blvd, 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, California 90025

jtsuei@raklaw.com (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:24-cv-00093-JRG Document 28 Filed 04/16/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 142
Morris J. WARREN, Petitioner, v. J. Ray ORMOND, Warden, et al.

No. 19M122.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 6, 2020

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Smith Barney Appreciation Fund Inc.  
Smith Barney Growth Opportunity Fund  
Smith Barney Investment Grade Bond Fund  
  
  
Supplement dated November 12, 1996 to prospectuses*  
______________________________  
  
	The provisions contained in the Prospectus of each of the funds listed   
above (each a "fund") under "Exchange Privilege-Class A Exchanges"   
notwithstanding, effective October 4, 1996, Class A shares of the Fund that   
are exchanged for the same class of shares of another Smith Barney
Mutual Fund   
sold with a higher maximum sales charge, will not be subject to any sales   
charge differential.  
  
___________________  
* Prospectuses dated:  
  
Appreciation Fund Inc.  
March 1, 1996  
  
Growth Opportunity Fund  
April 29, 1996  
  
Investment Grade Bond Fund  
April 29, 1996, as amended June 24,   
1996  
  
  
g:\users\rav\stk1a.doc
Ryan Keith MASON, Petitioner v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

No. 19-5290

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET-WTI - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                      Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/17/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      529,183
COMMITMENTS
  86,526   33,849  140,799  286,911  343,012  514,236  517,660   14,947   11,523

CHANGES FROM 06/10/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     20,610)
  -7,245   10,074   12,445   17,609    2,151   22,809   24,670   -2,199   -4,060

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    16.4      6.4     26.6     54.2     64.8     97.2     97.8      2.8      2.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      156)
      42       40       65       69       65      145      138
```

----

Updated June 20, 2014
IA 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 63 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Office of Personnel Management relating to the treatment of Members of Congress and congressional 

staff under section 1312 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care 

Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 16, 2013 

Mr. MCCAUL introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Office of Personnel Management relating to the 

treatment of Members of Congress and congressional 

staff under section 1312 of the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves of the rule submitted by the 

4 Office of Personnel Management relating to the treatment, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 63 IH 

1 for purposes of qualifying for certain Federal Employees 

2 Health Benefits Program (chapter 89 of title 5, United 

3 States Code) benefits, of Members of Congress and con4 gressional staff under section 1312 of the Patient Protec5 tion and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111–148) (78 

6 Fed. Reg. 48337 (August 8, 2013)), and such rule shall 

7 have no force or effect. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/08/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      457,197
COMMITMENTS
 147,952  218,779  101,275  176,258  103,598  425,485  423,652   31,712   33,545

CHANGES FROM 07/01/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      7,361)
     245    7,637    4,774      618   -6,848    5,637    5,563    1,724    1,798

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    32.4     47.9     22.2     38.6     22.7     93.1     92.7      6.9      7.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      211)
      70       83       79       39       39      152      167
```

----

Updated July 11, 2014
S. Patrick MENDEL, Petitioner, v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.;

S. Patrick Mendel, Petitioner, v. UBER Technologies Inc., et al.; and

S. Patrick Mendel, Petitioner, v. Elaine L. Chao, Secretary of Transportation, et al.

No. 19-8075.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 26, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
III 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 15 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2013 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of 

Representatives and a conditional recess or adjournment 

of the Senate. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on any legisla3 tive day from Friday, February 15, 2013, through Thurs4 day, February 21, 2013, on a motion offered pursuant to 

5 this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his 

6 designee, it stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Monday, Feb7 ruary 25, 2013, or until the time of any 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

HCON 15 RDS 

1 reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolu2 tion, whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate re3 cesses or adjourns on Friday, February 15, 2013, on a 

4 motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by 

5 its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed or 

6 adjourned until noon on Monday, February 25, 2013, or 

7 such other time on that day as may be specified in the 

8 motion to recess or adjourn, or until the time of any re9 assembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolu10 tion, whichever occurs first. 

11 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority 

12 Leader of the Senate, or their respective designees, acting 

13 jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of the 

14 House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify 

15 the Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, 

16 to reassemble at such place and time as they may des17 ignate if, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant 

18 it. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 15, 

2013. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Modern City Entertainment, Inc.. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William Erfurth President and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: September 1, 2009
By:
/s/ William ErfurthWilliam ErfurthPresident and Director