alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the Senate of the United States, 

October 10, 2013. 

Resolved, That the resolution from the House of Representatives (H. Con. Res. 58) entitled ‘‘Concurrent resolution expressing the sense of Congress regarding the need for 

the continued availability of religious services to members of 

the Armed Forces and their families during a lapse in appropriations.’’, do pass with the following 

AMENDMENTS: 

1 Ω1æStrike the preamble and insert the following: 

Whereas the Department of Defense determined that some contractor clergy, like other Department of Defense contractors, were unable to perform their contractual duties during the current lapse in appropriations; 

Whereas this determination may have impacted the ability of 

members of the Armed Forces and their families to worship 

and participate in religious activities; 

Whereas military chaplains on active duty, like all military 

personnel on active duty, continue to perform their duties 

during the current lapse in appropriations; 
2 

† HCON 58 EAS 

Whereas the Department continues to analyze its authorities 

under the Pay Our Military Act (Public Law 113–39) 

with respect to contractors; and 

Whereas the Pay Our Military Act appropriates such sums as 

are necessary to pay contractors of the Department whom 

the Secretary of Defense determines are providing support 

to members of the Armed Forces: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Ω2æOn page 2, strike line 3 and all that follows through 

2 page 3, line 2, and insert the following: 

3 (1) finds that the provision and availability of 

4 religious services and clergy is important to the mo5 rale and wellbeing of many members of the Armed 

6 Forces and their families; and 

7 (2) hopes the Secretary of Defense is able to de8 termine that contractor clergy provide necessary sup9 port to military personnel, and would therefore be 

10 covered under the appropriations made available 

11 under the Pay Our Military Act (Public Law 113– 

12 39). 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 58 

AMENDMENTS
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/31/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      520,740
COMMITMENTS
 100,684   18,950  137,359  263,984  353,848  502,027  510,157   18,713   10,583

CHANGES FROM 12/24/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -6,855)
  -4,502      909     -471   -2,662   -7,280   -7,635   -6,842      780      -13

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    19.3      3.6     26.4     50.7     68.0     96.4     98.0      3.6      2.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      132)
      35       30       50       64       55      124      111
```

----

Updated January 6, 2014
# C_2017029EN.01001301.xml

| 28.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 29/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 29/13

---

Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Changes to public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 29/11)

| Member State | France |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Lannion (Côte-de-Granit) – Paris (Orly) |
| Original date of entry into force of the public service obligation | 27 October 2003 |
| Date of entry into force of the changes | 23 September 2017 |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained | Order of 23 December 2016 amending the public service obligation imposed on scheduled air services between Lannion and Paris (Orly)
  NOR: DEVA1638280A
  http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/initRechTexte.do
  For further information please contact:





  Direction Générale de l’Aviation Civile |
| DTA/SDT/T2 |
| 50 rue Henry Farman |
| 75720 Paris cedex 15 |
| FRANCE |
| Tel. +33 158094321 |
| Email: osp-compagnies.dta@aviation-civile.gouv.fr |

Member State

France

Route concerned

Lannion (Côte-de-Granit) – Paris (Orly)

Original date of entry into force of the public service obligation

27 October 2003

Date of entry into force of the changes

23 September 2017

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained

Order of 23 December 2016 amending the public service obligation imposed on scheduled air services between Lannion and Paris (Orly)

NOR: DEVA1638280A

http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/initRechTexte.do

For further information please contact:

Direction Générale de l’Aviation Civile

DTA/SDT/T2

50 rue Henry Farman

75720 Paris cedex 15

FRANCE

Tel. +33 158094321

Email: osp-compagnies.dta@aviation-civile.gouv.fr

---
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 108 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.108
                                         Agreed to July 29, 2014        

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 5021) an Act to provide an 
extension of Federal-aid highway, highway safety, motor carrier safety, 
transit, and other programs funded out of the Highway Trust Fund, and 
for other purposes, the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall 
make the following correction: At the end, add the following and 
conform the table of contents accordingly:

               ``TITLE III--TREATMENT FOR PAYGO PURPOSES

``SEC. 3001. BUDGETARY EFFECTS.

    ``(a) PAYGO Scorecard.--The budgetary effects of this Act and the 
amendments made by this Act shall not be entered on either PAYGO 
scorecard maintained pursuant to section 4(d) of the Statutory Pay-As-
You-Go Act of 2010 (2 U.S.C. 933(d)).
    ``(b) Senate PAYGO Scorecard.--The budgetary effects of this Act 
and the amendments made by this Act shall not be entered on any PAYGO 
scorecard maintained for purposes of section 201 of S. Con. Res. 21 
(110th Congress).''.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
Louis S. SHUMAN, et ux., Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 19-929.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 27, 2020

Petition for rehearing denied.
# C_2018297EN.01000202.xml

| 23.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9045 — Blackstone/Aversys)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 297/04)

On 14 August 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9045. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9045. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Jose Alexander CALLEJAS RIVERA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES;

Miguel Angel Ibara-Ramos, Petitioner, v. Unted States; and

Wilfredo Funez Garsilla, Petitioner, v. United States.

No. 19-7052.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# C_2018073EN.01000101.xml

| 27.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8783 — Repsol/Kia/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 73/01)

On 19 February 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8783. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8783. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Jason Keith WALKER, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5023

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Edward SHEVTSOV, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7361.

Supreme Court of the United States.

June 1, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
 I, Ronald A. Klein, certify that:
 1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Origen Financial, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)), and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(g)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
   /s/ Ronald A. Klein
    
    Dated: November 3, 2006Ronald A. Klein,Chief Executive Officer of Origen Financial, Inc.
The Italy Fund Inc.
125 Broad Street
New York, NY 10004




CERTIFICATION





I, Richard L. Peteka certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form N-SAR of The Italy Fund Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial information included in this
report, and the financial statements on which the financial information
is based, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows
(if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash
flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report.

September 27, 2002



/s/ Richard L. Peteka

Richard L. Peteka
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018437EN.01003801.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 4.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 437/38 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9215 — Sumitomo Corporation/Toyota Motor Corporation/Kinto Corporation)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 437/10)

1.

On 27 November 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018437EN.01003801-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Sumitomo Corporation (Japan), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Toyota Motor Corporation (Japan), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Kinto Corporation (Japan). |

Sumitomo Corporation and Toyota Motor Corporation acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Kinto Corporation, a newly created company constituting a joint venture (the ‘JV’).

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares and contribution of assets.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Sumitomo Corporation: a trading and investment company active in automobile leasing, trading of metal products, transportation, media, mineral resources, energy, chemicals and electronics,

—   for Toyota Motor Corporation: a company active in manufacturing, sale, leasing and repair of motor vehicles, ships, aircraft and other transportation equipment, as well as in the sale of material-handling equipment,

—   for the JV: supply of mobility services, including leasing services, in Japan.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018437EN.01003801-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9215 — Sumitomo Corporation/Toyota Motor Corporation/Kinto Corporation

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018437EN.01003801-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018437EN.01003801-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
Keith Wayne CARVER, Jr., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES

No. 18-9805

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# C_2020254EN.01002701.xml

| 3.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 254/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 254/27

---

Corrigendum to ‘Accord de coopération et d’assistance administrative mutuelle en matière douanière entre l’Union européenne et la Nouvelle-Zélande ***

Résolution législative du Parlement européen du 13 mars 2018 sur le projet de décision du Conseil relative à la conclusion, au nom de l’Union européenne, de l’accord de coopération et d’assistance administrative mutuelle en matière douanière entre l’Union européenne et la Nouvelle-Zélande (07712/2016 – C8-0237/2017 – 2016/0006(NLE))’

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 162 of 10 May 2019
  )

(2020/C 254/09)

On page 128 and on the cover page:

for:

‘Accord de coopération et d’assistance administrative mutuelle en matière douanière entre l’Union européenne et la Nouvelle-Zélande ***

Résolution législative du Parlement européen du 13 mars 2018 sur le projet de décision du Conseil relative à la conclusion, au nom de l’Union européenne, de l’accord de coopération et d’assistance administrative mutuelle en matière douanière entre l’Union européenne et la Nouvelle-Zélande (07712/2016 – C8-0237/2017 – 2016/0006(NLE))’,

read:

‘EU-New Zealand agreement on cooperation and mutual administrative assistance in customs matters ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 March 2018 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and New Zealand on cooperation and mutual administrative assistance in customs matters (07712/2016 – C8-0237/2017 – 2016/0006(NLE))’.

---
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

_________________________________ 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

HAYLEE PLOTT McDONALD, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

No. 22-4051 

(D.C. No. 2:21-CR-00384-DS-1) 

(D. Utah) 

_________________________________ 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

_________________________________ 

Before BACHARACH, BRISCOE, and MORITZ, Circuit Judges. 

_________________________________ 

Pursuant to a plea agreement, Haylee Plott McDonald pleaded guilty to being a 

felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). 

She was sentenced to 37 months’ imprisonment. Ms. McDonald has filed an appeal 

despite the fact that her plea agreement contains a waiver of the right to appeal. The 

government has moved to enforce the appeal waiver. See United States v. Hahn, 

359 F.3d 1315, 1328 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (per curiam). 

 In evaluating a motion to enforce a waiver, we consider: “(1) whether the disputed 

appeal falls within the scope of the waiver of appellate rights; (2) whether the defendant 

* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines 

of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for 

its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. 

FILED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

September 19, 2022

Christopher M. Wolpert 

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 22-4051 Document: 010110741060 Date Filed: 09/19/2022 Page: 1
2 

knowingly and voluntarily waived [her] appellate rights; and (3) whether enforcing the 

waiver would result in a miscarriage of justice.” Id. at 1325. In response to the motion, 

Ms. McDonald, through counsel, has not disputed any of these factors. She concedes that 

the appeal falls within the scope of the appeal waiver, that she entered into the plea 

agreement knowingly and voluntarily, and that enforcement of the appeal waiver would 

not result in a miscarriage of justice. 

Our independent review confirms that Ms. McDonald’s appeal waiver is 

enforceable. She has identified no issues she wishes to raise on appeal that fall outside 

the scope of the appeal waiver. The plea agreement clearly sets forth the appeal waiver 

and states that Ms. McDonald agreed to it knowingly and voluntarily, and the district 

court confirmed Ms. McDonald’s understanding of the plea agreement during the change 

of plea hearing. Moreover, we see no evidence contradicting Ms. McDonald’s knowing 

and voluntary acceptance of the appeal waiver. Finally, there is no indication that 

enforcing the waiver would result in a miscarriage of justice as defined in Hahn, 359 F.3d 

at 1327. 

For the foregoing reasons, we grant the government’s motion to enforce the appeal 

waiver and dismiss the appeal. 

Entered for the Court 

Per Curiam 

Appellate Case: 22-4051 Document: 010110741060 Date Filed: 09/19/2022 Page: 2
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.7

                                     ALLONGE

                                       TO

                             DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE

         Affixed to the Demand Promissory Note, dated February 27, 2001, issued
by Peter J. Sprague to Wave Systems Corp.

                                                  Dated as of February 27, 2002

                           ---------------------------

         Reference is hereby made to the Demand Promissory Note, dated as of
February 27, 2001 (the "Note"), issued by Peter J. Sprague (the "Borrower")
payable to the order of Wave Systems Corp. (the "Holder"). Capitalized terms
used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings attributed thereto
in the Note.

         The Company and the Holder hereby agree to amend the Note as follows:

         The third paragraph of the Note is hereby amended and restated to read
in its entirety as follows:

         ANYTHING TO THE CONTRARY NOTWITHSTANDING, THE ENTIRE OUTSTANDING
PRINCIPAL BALANCE OF THIS NOTE AND ALL ACCRUED AND UNPAID INTEREST THEREON
SHALL BE DUE AND PAYABLE ON FEBRUARY 27, 2003. This note may be prepaid in
whole or from time to time without penalty.

         This Allonge shall be attached to the Note, made a part thereof and
read and construed as a single instrument with such Note. Except as hereby
amended, the Note shall continue in full force and effect. All terms and
conditions of the Note are hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Holder have each caused this
Allonge to be signed in its name by its duly authorized officer as of the day
and year first set forth above.

                               BORROWER

                               By:
                                  ---------------------------------------------
                                  Peter J. Sprague

                               WAVE SYSTEMS CORP.

                               By:
                                  ---------------------------------------------
                                  Title: