T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T OS C ARAR MAND O D I AZ - C OR VE R A, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 11- 72766 B I A N o. A 098- 270- 048 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A pr i l 16, 2013 ** Be f o r e : CA N BY , I K U TA , a n dW A TFO RD , C i rcu i tJu d g es. O s c arA rm ando D i a z - C orve r a , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of E l S a l va dor , pe t i t i ons f o rr e v ie w o f

th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rd is m is s in g h is appe a l f r om a n i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s appl i c a t i on f ora s y l um a n dw ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l. W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e 

# FI LED APR22 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 72766 2 r e v ie w f o rs ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e th e a g e n c y ’s f a c tu a l f in d in g s . Sh restha v. H

older , 5 9 0 F . 3 d1 0 3 4 , 1 0 3 9 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 1 0 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T h e r e c o r dd o e s n o tc o m p e l th e c o n c l u s i o n th a tDi a z - C o rv e r ah a s s h o wn e xtr a or di naryc i r c um s t anc e s t o e xc us e the unt i m e l yf i l i ng of hi s a s y l um appl i c a t i on, w he r e he t e s t i f i e d tha the kne w aboutthe f i l i ng de a dl i ne a nd c hos e not to f ile b e c au s e h e f

e ar e db e in g r e m o v e dif

h is a s y lu m c la im w a s d e n ie d . See 8 C . F . R § 1 20 8. 4(a) (5). A cc ordi ng l y, D i az -C orvera’ s a sy l um cl ai m fa i l s. W e r ej ec t D i az -C orvera’ s c on t ent i on thatthe B IA ’ s r ef usalt o con si der c hang ed c i r c um s t a nc e s de pr i ve d hi m of due pr oc e s s , be c aus e the B I A c ons i de r e d and r e je c te dh is c h an g e dc ir c u m s tan c e s a r g u m e n t. Se e La ta v . I NS , 204 F . 3d 1241, 1 2 4 6 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 0 ) (p et i t i o n er m u stsh o w erro r t o est ab l i sh a du e p ro cess v io la tio n ) . S ub st ant i alevi dence s up po rt s the B IA ’ s deni alof w i thh ol di ng of re m ov al be c aus e D i a z - C orve r af a i l e d t o e s t abl i s h tha tthe gove rnm e ntw a s unabl e or u n w illin g to c o n tr o l th e in d iv idu a ls w h o th r e a te n e dh im . See N ah rv an iv. G on zales , 3 9 9 F . 3 d1 1 4 8 , 1 1 5 4 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 5 ). B ecau se h e h as n o tsh o w n p ast pe r s e c ut i on, D i a z - C orve r a ’ s c ont e nt i on tha the i s e nt i t l e d t o apr e s um pt i on of f u tu r e p e r s e c u tio n f

a ils . Se e Mo l i n a - Es tra da v . I NS , 29 3 F . 3d 10 89 , 10 96 (9th C i r. 20 02 ). F urther, subst ant i alevi dence s up po rt s the agency’ s f i nd i ng thatD i az -11- 72766 3 C orve r af

a i l e d t o de m ons tr a t e i ti s m or e l i ke l ythan nothe w i l l be pe r s e c ut e d i f he re turns t o E l S al vado r, because the peop l e w ho threa t ened hi m have no ti nq ui re d abou thi s w here abou t s s i nce 200 6, and cou ntrycond i t i on s e vi dence s ho w s that p o litic a l v io le n c e in E l S a lv a d o ris s p o r a d ic . See T am an g v. H

older , 598 F . 3d 10 83 , 10 94 -95 (9th C i r. 20 10 ) ( evi dence of changed cou ntrycond i t i on s m i t i gat es ag ain st fe aro f f

u tu re p er se cu ti o n up o n re tu rn ). A cc o rd in g ly, D iaz- C o rv er a’s w ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l c la im f

a ils . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.