alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Arthur O. ARMSTRONG, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

No. 19-5213

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.

Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
Oliver Lee WHITE, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19M75

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted.
Galen LeMar AMERSON, et al., Petitioners, v. ATLAS LAW FIRM, P.C., et al.

No. 19-7762.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 6, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Colorado denied.
Jose LAUREANO SALGADO, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6549

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
# C_2018181EN.01000101.xml

| 28.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 181/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 181/1

---

RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 18 May 2018

to the Council of the European Union on the external auditors of Lietuvos bankas

(ECB/2018/15)

(2018/C 181/01)

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 27.1 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and the national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB's Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and the national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB's Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union.

| (2) | The mandate of Lietuvos bankas' current external auditors, UAB PricewaterhouseCoopers, ended following the audit for the financial year 2017. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2018. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The mandate of Lietuvos bankas' current external auditors, UAB PricewaterhouseCoopers, ended following the audit for the financial year 2017. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2018.

| (3) | Lietuvos bankas has selected UAB Deloitte Lietuva as its external auditors for the financial years 2018 to 2021, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Lietuvos bankas has selected UAB Deloitte Lietuva as its external auditors for the financial years 2018 to 2021,

HAS ADOPTED THIS RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that UAB Deloitte Lietuva should be appointed as the external auditors of Lietuvos bankas for the financial years 2018 to 2021.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 18 May 2018.

The President of the ECB

Mario DRAGHI

---
# C_2017439EN.01001401.xml

| 20.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 439/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 439/14

---

Notice concerning a request pursuant to Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU

End of the suspension of the period for adoption of implementing acts

(2017/C 439/10)

On 30 January 2017 the Commission received a request pursuant to Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC (1).

1

This request, made by Eneco BV and NV Nuon Energy, concerns retail of electricity and gas in the Netherlands. The relevant notice was published on page 6 of OJ C 85 of 18 March 2017. The initial deadline was 6 July 2017.

On 24 March 2017 the Commission asked the Dutch Authorities to provide additional information by 19 April 2017 at the latest. As announced in the notice that was published on page 24 of OJ C 212 of 1 July 2017, the final deadline was prolonged by 53 working days after the receipt of the complete and correct information. Complete and correct information was received on 25 September 2017.

The final deadline therefore expires on 12 December 2017.

---

(1)  OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 243.

1

---
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 Eastern District of Texas VIRTAMOVE, CORP. HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY 2:24-cv-00093-JRG VIRTAMOVE, CORP. 04/16/2024 /s/ Qi (Peter) Tong Qi (Peter) Tong, TX SBN 24119042

Russ August & Kabat 

4925 Greenville Ave., Suite 200 

Dallas, TX 75206

ptong@raklaw.com (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:24-cv-00093-JRG Document 30 Filed 04/16/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 144
Michelle MONASKY, Petitioner, v. Domenico TAGLIERI.

No. 18-935

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted.
Martin ARAIZA-JACOBO, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5436

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Michael T. Heffernan, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

 

(1)                                 the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                 the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|     | /s/   MICHAEL T. HEFFERNAN              |
|----------|-----------------------------------------|
|     |                                    |
|     | Michael   Heffernan                     |
| * * | *President and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

Date: June 22, 2015

 

----
Rodolfo CANTU, Jr., aka Lil Rudy, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5310

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY
RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 CERTIFICATIONS I, W. Anderson Geater, Jr., certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Origen Financial,
Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the




---



##### 



Page 2 audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. 
 Dated:
August 12, 2005
    
    /s/ W. Anderson Geater, Jr.W. Anderson Geater, Jr.,Chief Financial Officer of Origen Financial, Inc.
Sylvester D. COLLINS, petitioner, v. GEORGIA.

No. 17-8817.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Georgia, Athens-Clarke County denied.
Deborah WALTON, Petitioner, v. FIRST MERCHANTS BANK, et al.

No. 19-93

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
10f-3 REPORT

SMITH BARNEY INCOME FUNDS
SMITH BARNEY MUNICIPAL HIGH INCOME FUND

" November 1, 2001 through January 31,2002"

	Trade				% of
Issuer	Date	Selling Dealer	Amount	Price	Issue (1)

Puerto Rico Public	1/11/02	Lehman Brothers	"$2,000,000"	$98.873	0.79	A
  Buildings Authority
  5.375% due 7/1/33



(1)  Represents purchases by all affiliated funds; may not exceed
       25% of the principal amount of the offering.

"A-Includes purchases of $2,000,000 by other Smith Barney Mutual Funds."
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 97-3782EA

_____________ United States of America, * * Appellee, *

* v. * * Royce Kelvin Sanders, * * Appellant. * Appeals from the United States

_____________ District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. No. 97-3856EA

_____________ [UNPUBLISHED] United States of America, * * Appellee, *

* v. * * Ronnie Joe Benson, * * Appellant. *

_____________ Submitted: September 21, 1998

Filed: November 16, 1998

_____________-2-

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD , Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. The Government tried Royce Kelvin Sanders and Ronnie Joe Benson together for thei r participation in a large-scale drug operation. A jury convicted Sanders an d Benson of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and related crimes. We affirm.
Sanders contends the dist

rict court improperly denied his motion for severance. Based on our review, we fi nd no abuse of discretion in the district court’s ruling. The Government compartmentalized its evidence against each defendant and the distric t court gave opening and closing instructions informing the jury to decide eac h defendant’s case “solely on the evidence that applies to him.”
Ne xt, Benson raises several contentions related to the sufficiency of th e indictment and of the evidence supporting his con viction. We reject these contentions. First, the record contains substantial evidence on which the jury reasonably could have found Be nson guilty of the charges. Second, the district court did not abuse it s discretion in denying Benson’s motion for severance. Third, Benson’s assertion s related to the sufficiency of the indictment a nd the evidence the Government presented to the grand jury and offered at trial are without legal merit. F inally, Benson also raises an argument about his senten ce. We reject this argument as well. The district court’s factual f indings about Benson’s obstruction of justice and the quantity and identity of dru gs involved are not clearly erroneous. The probation officer properly based hi s assessments on the trial testimony and the district court correctly determined Benson’s guidelines sentence. We further conclude the additional pro se arguments on appea l are either foreclosed by the holdings of this Court, otherwise without legal merit, o r both.-3-

We thus affirm Sanders’s and Benson’s convictions and Benson’s sentence. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```
 
 
WHEAT-HRSpring - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                          Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/16/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       66,217
COMMITMENTS
  15,012    9,512    2,573   33,154   41,741   50,739   53,826   15,478   12,391

CHANGES FROM 12/09/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,180)
  -1,199      661     -252      467     -247     -984      162    2,164    1,018

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    22.7     14.4      3.9     50.1     63.0     76.6     81.3     23.4     18.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       91)
      21       14       12       44       35       71       57
```

----

Updated December 19, 2014
# C_2018111EN.01002101.xml

| 26.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/21

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8772 — Borealis/Nova Chemicals/Total/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 111/02)

On 20 March 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8772. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8772. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
LOOP AI LABS, INC., et al., Petitioners v. Anna GATTI, et al.

No. 19-59

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
H. F., Petitioner, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK;

No. 18-9209

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 3.3


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                           SYNERGISTIC HOLDINGS CORP.


                  Synergistic Holdings Corp., a corporation organized and
existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware (the "Corporation"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

                  FIRST: That the Board of Directors of the Corporation, by a
unanimous vote, filed in the minutes of a meeting of the Board, adopted a
resolution proposing and declaring advisable the following amendment to the
Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation:

                  RESOLVED, that subject to the approval of the stockholders of
                  the Corporation, Article First of the Certificate of
                  Incorporation of the Corporation be amended to read in its
                  entirety as follows:

                           "Article First: The name of the Corporation is Salex
                  Holding Corporation."

                  SECOND: That thereafter, pursuant to a resolution of the
Corporation's Board of Directors, an annual meeting of the stockholders of the
Corporation was duly called and held, upon notice in accordance with Section 222
of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, at which meeting the
necessary number of shares as required by statute were voted in favor of the
foregoing amendment.

                  THIRD: That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with
the applicable provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware.


                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this
Certificate to be signed by Salvatore Crimi, its Chief Executive Officer, this
26th day of January 1998.

                                    Synergistic Holdings Corp.


                                    By: /s/ Salvatore Crimi
                                        ------------------------------------
                                        Name:  Salvatore Crimi
                                        Title: Chief Executive Officer
# C_2017196EN.01001001.xml

| 20.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 196/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 196/10

---

Notice concerning the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1328 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain cold rolled flat steel products originating in the People’s Republic of China and the Russian Federation: name change of one company subject to an individual anti-dumping duty rate

(2017/C 196/07)

Hebei Iron and Steel Co., Ltd — Shijiazhuang TARIC (1) additional code C103 a company subject to an individual anti-dumping duty rate of 20,5 % informed the Commission that it had changed its name into Hesteel Co., Ltd Tangshan Branch — Tangshan.

1

The company asked the Commission to confirm that the change of name does not affect the right of the company to benefit from the individual duty rate applied to the company under its previous name.

The Commission has examined the information supplied and concluded that the change of name in no way affects the findings of the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1328 (2).

2

Therefore, the reference in the Annex to the Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1328 to:

| Hebei Iron and Steel Co., Ltd, Shijiazhuang | C103 |
| --- | --- |

Hebei Iron and Steel Co., Ltd, Shijiazhuang

C103

should be read as:

| Hesteel Co., Ltd Tangshan Branch, Tangshan | C103 |
| --- | --- |

Hesteel Co., Ltd Tangshan Branch, Tangshan

C103

The TARIC additional code C103 previously attributed to Hebei Iron and Steel Co., Ltd, Shijiazhuang shall apply to Hesteel Co., Ltd Tangshan Branch, Tangshan.

---

(1)  The integrated Tariff of the European Union.

1

(2)  OJ L 210, 4.8.2016, p. 1.

2

---
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1045 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1045

        To suspend temporarily the duty on Disperse Blue 291:1.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2013

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on Disperse Blue 291:1.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISPERSE BLUE 291:1.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Disperse Blue       Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          291:1 (CAS No.                                                    12/31/2016
                          51868-46-3)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3808.93.15)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```