alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.27


 


DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE


 


	
  $25,000

  	
  October 16, 2003

  



 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, PURCHASESOFT, INC, a
Delaware corporation (“Borrower”), promises to pay to the order of Steven A.
Flagg, an individual resident of the State of California (“Lender”),
at such place as the holder hereof may designate, in lawful money of the United
States of America, the principal sum of Twenty-five Thousand Dollars ($25,000),
plus interest as hereinafter provided, on demand. This Note shall be due and
payable 180 days from the date hereof.  
This Note shall bear interest on the unpaid principal amount hereof at
the rate of 6% per annum; provided that interest shall accrue at the rate of 8%
per annum on any principal or accrued interest that is not paid within five
days of written demand, from the date of such demand until the date of payment.


 


Borrower
waives presentment, demand, protest, notice of protest, notice of dishonor,
notice of nonpayment, any and all other notices and demands in connection with
the delivery, acceptance, performance, default or enforcement of this
Note.  No delay by the holder hereof in
exercising any power or right in respect of this Note shall operate as a waiver
of such or any other power or right.


 


Borrower may at any time prepay in whole or
in part, from time to time, the outstanding principal amount of this Note,
together with accrued interest to date of payment on the principal amount so
prepaid.


 


Borrower shall pay the holder hereof all
costs and expenses of collection of this Note, including without limitation
reasonable attorneys’ fees.


 


This Note shall be deemed to be made under
and shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State
of California.


 


 


	
   

  	
  PURCHASESOFT, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By

  	
  /s/ Thomas B. Marsh

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Thomas B. Marsh

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Secretary and Treasurer
# C_2018261EN.01001601.xml

| 25.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/16

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.8984 — Hg/Vista/Allocate)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 261/04)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | HgCapital LLP (‘HG’, UK), |
| --- | --- |

—

HgCapital LLP (‘HG’, UK),

| — | Vista Equity Partners (‘Vista’, USA), and |
| --- | --- |

—

Vista Equity Partners (‘Vista’, USA), and

| — | Allocate Software (‘Allocate’, UK) controlled by Vista. |
| --- | --- |

—

Allocate Software (‘Allocate’, UK) controlled by Vista.

Hg and Vista acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of Allocate. The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | Hg is a private equity firm which invests mainly in Europe into technology and technology enabled service businesses. A number of Hg’s portfolio companies provide IT Services including the provision of business software, |
| --- | --- |

—

Hg is a private equity firm which invests mainly in Europe into technology and technology enabled service businesses. A number of Hg’s portfolio companies provide IT Services including the provision of business software,

| — | Vista is a U.S. based private equity firm that is focused on investments in software, data and technology-enabled businesses led by world-class management teams with long-term perspective, |
| --- | --- |

—

Vista is a U.S. based private equity firm that is focused on investments in software, data and technology-enabled businesses led by world-class management teams with long-term perspective,

| — | Allocate is a provider of workforce and risk management software primarily to the healthcare industry. |
| --- | --- |

—

Allocate is a provider of workforce and risk management software primarily to the healthcare industry.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.8984 — Hg/Vista/Allocate

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| --- |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
# C_2018370EN.01000201.xml

| 12.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 370/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 370/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8952 — STEAG/Siemens/JV STEAG GuD)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 370/02)

On 21 September 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8952. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8952. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Cherunda Lynn FOX, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, et al.

No. 19-7806.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 27, 2020

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petition in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin* v. *District of Columbia Court of Appeals* , 506 U.S. 1 (1992) (*per curiam* ).
Independent Auditors' Consent




To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Smith Barney Small Cap Blend Fund, Inc.:
We consent to the incorporation by reference, in this Prospectus and
Statement of Additional
Information, of our report dated February 11, 2000, on the statement
 of assets and liabilities for the
Smith Barney Small Cap Blend Fund, Inc. as of December 31, 1999 and
 the related statement of
operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net
assets for each of the years in
the two-year period then ended and the financial highlights for each
 of the years in the five-year
period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights
and our report thereon are
included in the Annual Report of the Fund as filed on Form N-30D.
We also consent to the references to our firm under the headings
 "Financial Highlights" in the
Prospectus and "Auditors" in the Statement of Additional Information.



KPMG LLP
New York, New York
April 25, 2000
Page
# C_2018174EN.01002101.xml

| 23.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 174/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 174/21

---

Corrigendum to the list of Member States and their competent authorities concerning Articles 15(2), 17(8) and 21(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 39 of 2 February 2018
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 39 of 2 February 2018

(2018/C 174/12)

On page 26, in the table, in the entry for Spain, under ‘Competent authorities’:

for:

for:

‘Ministerio de Agricultura y PESCA, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente; Secretaria General de PESCA; Dirección General de Ordenación Pesquera; Subdirección General de Control e Inspección (Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Food and Environment; Secretary-General of Fisheries; Directorate-General of Fisheries Management; Subdirectorate General of Control and Inspection)’,

read:

read:

‘Ministerio de Agricultura y PESCA, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente; Secretaría General de PESCA; Dirección General de Ordenación Pesquera y Acuicultura; Subdirección General de Control e Inspección (Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Food and Environment; Secretary-General of Fisheries; Directorate-General of Fisheries and Aquaculture Management; Subdirectorate General of Control and Inspection)’.

---
Brandon JONES, Petitioner v. ILLINOIS.

No. 19-5864

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 12, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000912276
<NAME> BRYLANE CAPITAL CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-03-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-01-1997
<CASH>                                          21,850
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,279
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,071
<INVENTORY>                                    208,301
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               337,083
<PP&E>                                          94,940
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,462
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 749,928
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          271,550
<BONDS>                                        342,229
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,500
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     126,313
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   749,928
<SALES>                                        365,454
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               365,454
<CGS>                                          185,536
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  185,536
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               144,053
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,427
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,754
<INCOME-TAX>                                        40
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,714
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,714
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
NO. 07-05-0390-CR

NO. 07-05-0391-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

DECEMBER 20, 2005

______________________________

ROSS DANIEL MONNETT, 

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 251st DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NOS. 49,127-C and 49,128-C; HON. PATRICK PIRTLE, PRESIDING

_______________________________

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

Ross Daniel Monnett appeals his convictions for possessing a controlled substance.

He pled guilty to the offenses in accordance with a plea bargain and confessed to the

accusations in the indictments. Upon determining that his plea was knowing and voluntary,

the trial court found him guilty of the offenses and assessed punishment within the range

recommended by the prosecutor. As part of the bargain, appellant also waived his right

to appeal the causes, and the trial court certified, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate
2

Procedure 25.2(a)(2) and (d), that he had no right to appeal them. 

According to Rule 25.2(a)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the trial

court must certify whether or not the appellant has the right to appeal. If such a

certification has not been executed, the appeal must be dismissed. TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(d). Here, the trial court did not certify that appellant had a right to appeal; quite the

contrary, it certified that he did not. Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed per Texas Rule

of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d).

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
Exhibit 32.1


Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of A. O. Smith Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”). I, Kevin J. Wheeler, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: February 11, 2022/s/ Kevin J. WheelerKevin J. WheelerChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2018347EN.01000101.xml

| 28.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8999 — CACF/Bankia/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 347/01)

On 30 July 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8999. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8999. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         125,601
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,667
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               813,725
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  2,353,541
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           3,902
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             3,914
<LOANS>                                      9,031,409
<ALLOWANCE>                                  (110,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,228,239
<DEPOSITS>                                  10,867,656
<SHORT-TERM>                                   160,022
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            521,700
<LONG-TERM>                                    399,564
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,103
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,278,194
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              13,228,239
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                199,329
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               44,132
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,624
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               245,085
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             116,002
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             125,735
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          119,350
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  (4,012)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               1,135
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 73,948
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 54,172
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      33,586
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,586
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.45
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.93
<LOANS-NON>                                    341,249
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             (109,000)
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  (3,198)
<RECOVERIES>                                       186
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            (110,000)
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         (110,000)
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING 

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED 

 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 

 OF FLORIDA 

 SECOND DISTRICT 

INDYMAC FEDERAL SAVINGS ) 

BANK, FSB, ) 

 ) 

 Appellant, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 2D14-1010 

 ) 

FRANK J. NABOZNY, ) 

 ) 

 Appellee. ) 

________________________________ ) 

Opinion filed February 10, 2016. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas 

County; Jack Day, Judge. 

Manuel S. Hiraldo and Paul J. Sodhi 

of Blank Rome LLP, Fort Lauderdale, 

for Appellant. 

Roger O. Mills of Mills Law, P.A., 

Tampa, for Appellee. 

NORTHCUTT, Judge. 

 IndyMac Federal Savings Bank, FSB, appeals a final summary judgment 

dismissing its foreclosure claim against Frank Nabozny based on the court's conclusion 

that the bank's notice of default letter did not comply with the requirements of the 

mortgage. We conclude that IndyMac's letter substantially complied with its notice 

obligations under the mortgage terms and thus was sufficient. See Green Tree 
- 2 - 

Servicing, LLC v. Milam, 40 Fla. L. Weekly D1733 (Fla. 2d DCA July 29, 2015). 

Accordingly, we reverse the summary judgment and remand for further proceedings. 

 Reversed and remanded. 

LaROSE and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
# C_2018297EN.01000201.xml

| 23.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8786 — OMERS/DV4/QIA/ABP/Real Estate JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 297/03)

On 3 August 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8786. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8786. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
# C_2018324EN.01001201.xml

| 13.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 324/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 324/12

---

Special Report No 23/2018

‘Air pollution: Our health still insufficiently protected’

(2018/C 324/05)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 23/2018 ‘Air pollution: Our health still insufficiently protected’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://eca.europa.eu

---
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In connection with the accompanying
Annual Report of Modern City Entertainment, Inc.. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William Erfurth President and
Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350,as adopted pursuant toSection 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of my knowledge, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2) The information contained in the
Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      October 20, 2008
            By:
            /s/ William
      ErfurthWilliam
      ErfurthPresident
      and Director