Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 115 / Wednesday, June 15, 2022 / Notices 36127 

may also be shared with state agencies 

and with the public as part of their 

participation in the Superfund 

evaluation and decision-making 

process. This may include public 

disclosure of addresses where EPA 

determines cleanup actions are 

required. 

2. In case of emergency, EPA may 

share information with members of the 

public to assure protection of the 

environment or public health and 

safety. 

3. Records may be shared with 

external parties in support of 

investigation; cleanup; program 

planning; community outreach; 

coordination with state, local and tribal 

entities; listing and de-listing of 

Superfund sites; enforcement activities; 

and litigation. 

POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORAGE OF

RECORDS: 

Records will be stored electronically 

in an Agency-approved database 

(Oracle) and managed by system 

developers and administrators, along 

with EPA Office of Superfund 

Remediation and Technology 

Information (OSRTI) personnel. 

Incremental system backups are 

performed nightly and monthly. Actual 

files are stored in a Windows file server. 

POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR RETRIEVAL OF

RECORDS: 

Records can be retrieved by Site 

Name, Site ID Number, Author, 

Addressee, Document Title, Document 

Date, and Document ID Number. 

POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR RETENTION AND

DISPOSAL OF RECORDS: 

Records maintained in this system are 

subject to record schedule 0755, which 

is still being finalized. 

ADMINISTRATIVE, TECHNICAL, AND PHYSICAL

SAFEGUARDS: 

Security controls used to protect 

personal sensitive data in SEMS are 

commensurate with those required for 

an information system rated 

MODERATE for confidentiality, 

integrity, and availability, as prescribed 

in National Institute of Standards and 

Technology (NIST) Special Publication, 

800–53, ‘‘Security and Privacy Controls 

for Federal Information Systems and 

Organizations,’’ Revision 5. 

1. Administrative Safeguards: The 

system has a single point of access via 

a front-end Portal. All users are required 

to complete a new user form (signed by 

their supervisor) and take online 

security training before they are 

provided with access. All authorized 

users of the SEMS application are 

required to take an annual security and 

privacy awareness training identifying 

the user’s role and responsibilities for 

protecting the Agency’s information 

resources, as well as consequences for 

not adhering to the policy. 

2. Technical Safeguards: Information 

is maintained in a secure username/ 

password protected environment. 

Permission-level assignments allow 

users access only to those functions for 

which they are authorized. Audit logs 

are reviewed on a monthly basis to 

identify system access outside of normal 

business hours, anomalous user 

accounts or server names, or login 

failures. No external access to SEMS is 

provided. 

3. Physical Safeguards: Access to all 

information and hardware is maintained 

in a secure, access-controlled facility at 

the NCC. 

RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES: 

All requests for access to personal 

records should cite the Privacy Act of 

1974 and reference the type of request 

being made (i.e., access). Requests must 

include: (1) the name and signature of 

the individual making the request; (2) 

the name of the Privacy Act system of 

records to which the request relates; (3) 

a statement whether a personal 

inspection of the records or a copy of 

them by mail is desired; and (4) proof 

of identity. A full description of EPA’s 

Privacy Act procedures for requesting 

access to records is included in EPA’s 

Privacy Act regulations at 40 CFR part 

16. 

CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES: 

Requests for correction or amendment 

must include: (1) the name and 

signature of the individual making the 

request; (2) the name of the Privacy Act 

system of records to which the request 

relates; (3) a description of the 

information sought to be corrected or 

amended and the specific reasons for 

the correction or amendment; and (4) 

proof of identity. A full description of 

EPA’s Privacy Act procedures for the 

correction or amendment of a record is 

included in EPA’s Privacy Act 

regulations at 40 CFR part 16. 

NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES: 

Individuals who wish to be informed 

whether a Privacy Act system of records 

maintained by EPA contains any record 

pertaining to them, should make a 

written request to the EPA, Attn: 

Agency Privacy Officer, MC 2831T, 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, 

Washington, DC 20460, or by email at: 

privacy@epa.gov. A full description of 

EPA’s Privacy Act procedures is 

included in EPA’s Privacy Act 

regulations at 40 CFR part 16. 

EXEMPTIONS PROMULGATED FOR THE SYSTEM: 

None. 

HISTORY: 

80 FR 21237 (February 17, 2015). 

Vaughn Noga, 

Senior Agency Official for Privacy. 

[FR Doc. 2022–12825 Filed 6–14–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

GENERAL SERVICES 

ADMINISTRATION 

[OMB Control No. 3090–0302; Docket No. 

2022–0001; Sequence No. 3] 

Submission for OMB Review; General 

Services Administration Acquisition 

Regulation; Modifications (Federal 

Supply Schedule) 552.238–82 

AGENCY: Office of Acquisition Policy, 

General Services Administration (GSA). 

ACTION: Notice of request for public 

comments regarding an extension to an 

existing OMB clearance. 

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act, the 

Regulatory Secretariat Division will be 

submitting to the Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) a request to review 

and approve an extension to the 

information collection requirement 

regarding the Modifications (Federal 

Supply Schedule) clause. 

DATES: Submit comments on or before 

July 15, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments and 

recommendations for this information 

collection should be sent within 30 days 

of publication of this notice to 

www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. 

Find this particular information 

collection by selecting ‘‘Currently under 

Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or 

by using the search function. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Thomas O’Linn, Procurement Analyst, 

General Services Acquisition Policy 

Division, GSA, 202–445–0390 or email 

gsarpolicy@gsa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

A. Purpose 

The General Services Administration 

Acquisition Regulation (GSAR) clause 

552.238–82, Modifications (Federal 

Supply Schedule), which was 

previously titled and numbered as 

552.238–81 Modifications (see 84 FR 

17030 dated April 23, 2019), requires 

Contractors who have a GSA Federal 

Supply Schedule (FSS) contract to 

request a contract modification by 

submitting information to the 

contracting officer. The clause covers 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
36128 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 115 / Wednesday, June 15, 2022 / Notices 

the following types of contract 

modification requests: additional items/ 

additional SINs, deletions, and price 

reductions. At a minimum, each 

contract modification request covered 

by this clause is to include an 

explanation for the request and 

supporting information. 

B. Annual Reporting Burden 

Respondents: 14,200. 

Responses per Respondent: 1. 

Total Responses: 14,200. 

Hours per Response: 3.5. 

Total Burden Hours: 49,700. 

C. Public Comments 

A 60-day notice published in the 

Federal Register at 87 FR 19936 on 

April 6, 2022. No comments were 

received. 

Obtaining Copies of Proposals: 

Requesters may obtain a copy of the 

information collection documents from 

the GSA Regulatory Secretariat Division, 

by calling 202–501–4755 or emailing 

GSARegSec@gsa.gov. Please cite OMB 

Control No. 3090–0302, ‘‘Modifications 

(Federal Supply Schedule)’’ in all 

correspondence. 

Jeffrey A. Koses, 

Senior Procurement Executive, Office of 

Acquisition Policy, Office of Governmentwide Policy. 

[FR Doc. 2022–12887 Filed 6–14–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6820–61–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Agency for Healthcare Research and 

Quality 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed Collection; 

Comment Request 

AGENCY: Agency for Healthcare Research 

and Quality, HHS. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 

intention of the Agency for Healthcare 

Research and Quality (AHRQ) to request 

that the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) approve the proposed 

information collection project ‘‘Measure 

Dx: A Resource to Identify, Analyze, 

and Learn from Diagnostic Safety 

Events.’’ 

DATES: Comments on this notice must be 

received by August 15, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments should 

be submitted to: Doris Lefkowitz, 

Reports Clearance Officer, AHRQ, by 

email at doris.lefkowitz@AHRQ.hhs.gov. 

Copies of the proposed collection 

plans, data collection instruments, and 

specific details on the estimated burden 

can be obtained from the AHRQ Reports 

Clearance Officer. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Doris Lefkowitz, AHRQ Reports 

Clearance Officer, (301) 427–1477, or by 

email at doris.lefkowitz@AHRQ.hhs.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Proposed Project 

Measure Dx: A Resource To Identify, 

Analyze, and Learn From Diagnostic 

Safety Events 

The Measure Dx resource (the 

Resource) is a modular toolkit that 

provides clinicians, quality and safety 

personnel, and healthcare organization 

leaders with guidance for implementing 

diagnostic safety measurement strategies 

for the purposes of learning and 

improvement. The Resource was 

developed and pilot tested (Fast Track 

OMB control number: 0935–0179) 

during the base year of an AHRQ 

contract awarded to the MedStar Health 

Research Institute and provides 

pragmatic recommendations for 

implementing measurement strategies 

that were identified in the AHRQ Issue 

Brief titled Operational Measurement of 

Diagnostic Safety: State of the Science. 

In particular, the Resource focuses on 

four broad measurement strategies that 

were assessed to be approaching 

readiness for implementation in 

operational settings. 

AHRQ is requesting full OMB 

approval to conduct a formal evaluation 

of the Resource. AHRQ would like to 

further develop this resource, expanding 

on the initial pilot test which 

qualitatively examined feasibility of 

implementing the resource, general 

receptivity, and feedback for 

improvement. 

This information collection has the 

following goal: 

1. To evaluate the Resource in order 

to stimulate measurement activities for 

learning and improvement and 

quantitatively and qualitatively 

examine: 

a. Feasibility of implementing the 

Resource with limited to no technical 

assistance; 

b. User experience and satisfaction 

with the Resource; 

c. Impact of the Resource on 

diagnostic safety policies or activities; 

d. Yield of newly detected diagnostic 

safety events and associated learning 

resulting from use of the Resource; 

e. Intent to sustain use of the Resource 

and continue with the diagnostic safety 

process following evaluation efforts. 

This information collection is being 

conducted by AHRQ through its 

contractor, MedStar Health Research 

Institute, pursuant to AHRQ’s statutory 

authority to conduct and support 

research on healthcare and on systems 

for the delivery of such care, including 

activities with respect to the quality, 

effectiveness, efficiency, 

appropriateness and value of healthcare 

services and with respect to quality 

measurement and improvement. 42 

U.S.C. 299a(a)(1) and (2). 

Method of Collection 

To achieve the goals of this project the 

following information collection 

instruments will be completed: 

(1) Organizational Characteristics 

Survey—designed to qualitatively 

describe the characteristics of the 

organizations engaged in evaluation 

(e.g., patient characteristics, practice 

size, and staffing). 

(2) Organizational Self-Assessment 

Survey—designed to qualitatively assess 

the organization’s readiness (e.g., 

leadership support, resources, and 

safety culture/infrastructure) for 

implementing the Resource. 

(3) The Safer Dx Checklist—A 

synthesis of foundational practices that 

health care organizations can use to 

advance diagnostic excellence. The 

checklist provides a framework for 

organizations to conduct a selfassessment to understand the current 

state of diagnostic practices, identify 

areas to improve, and track progress 

toward diagnostic excellence over time. 

(4) Pre-test Evaluation Interview 

Protocol—designed to qualitatively 

assess the organization’s current 

policies and structures related to 

diagnostic safety, plans for 

implementing the Resource, and initial 

feedback on resource materials. 

(5) Post-test Evaluation Interview 

Protocol—designed to qualitatively 

assess the organization’s experience 

with implementing the Resource, the 

impact of the Resource on diagnostic 

safety policies or activities in their 

organization, contextual information 

about whether and how the Resource 

facilitated case detection, and intent to 

sustain use of the Resource following 

evaluation efforts. 

(6) Team Questionnaire—adapted to 

help organizations self-assess diagnostic 

teamwork in their organization & their 

diagnostic team’s commitment to 

implementing the Resource. 

(7) Case Review Summary Form— 

designed to quantitatively and 

qualitatively summarize the diagnostic 

safety intelligence that participants have 

detected, analyzed, and/or learned from 

while implementing one Measure Dx 

strategy. 

(8) ECHO Calls Protocol—The 

purpose of virtual ECHO calls is to 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1