alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF PERIODICREPORT**        I,Dennis G. McLaughlin, III, Chief Executive Officer of Earth Biofuels, Inc.(the “Company”), certify,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of myknowledge:        (1)        the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and        (2)        the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.    Date: June 13, 2007    /s/ Dennis G. McLaughlin,III   Dennis G. McLaughlin, III
Lenroy MCLEAN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8412.

Supreme Court of the United States.

June 1, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
John G. CURRY, Petitioner v. Mark Joseph LOPEZ, Associate Judge, Circuit Court of Illinois, Cook County, et al.

No. 18-9750

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 12, 2019

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
Emerson L. BEVERLY, Petitioner v. Sherry L. BURT, Warden.

No. 19-6380

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00111-CV

IN RE ESTATE OF Gilbert M. DENMAN, Jr., Deceased

From the Probate Court No. 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2004-PC-1687-D

Honorable Polly Jackson Spencer, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE ANGELINI, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. We 

ORDER that appellee, The Trust Company, recover its costs of this appeal from appellant Wendel 

Denman Thuss. 

SIGNED September 17, 2014.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
# C_2018241EN.01000301.xml

| 10.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 241/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 241/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8987 — HPS/MDP/HAPS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 241/05)

On 4 July 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8987. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8987. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1115 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1115

 To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to prohibit any national 
securities exchange from effecting any transaction in a security issued 
    by a corporation unless the corporation's registration with the 
exchange includes a certification that the corporation currently is in 
compliance with the provisions of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 
  1971 governing contributions and expenditures by corporations which 
       were in effect with respect to elections held during 2008.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 13, 2013

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to prohibit any national 
securities exchange from effecting any transaction in a security issued 
    by a corporation unless the corporation's registration with the 
exchange includes a certification that the corporation currently is in 
compliance with the provisions of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 
  1971 governing contributions and expenditures by corporations which 
       were in effect with respect to elections held during 2008.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITING TRANSACTIONS ON NATIONAL SECURITIES EXCHANGES IN 
              SECURITIES OF CORPORATIONS NOT CERTIFYING COMPLIANCE WITH 
              EXISTING RULES GOVERNING POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND 
              EXPENDITURES.

    (a) Registration.--Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78l(b)) is amended by adding at the end the following 
new paragraph:
            ``(4) If the issuer is a corporation, a statement 
        certifying that the issuer is in compliance with section 316 of 
        the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 with respect to 
        contributions and expenditures made by the corporation in the 
        most recent quarter and year, as such section applied with 
        respect to elections held in 2008.''.
    (b) Periodic Reports.--Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act 
of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)) is amended--
            (1) at the end of paragraph (1), by striking the period and 
        inserting a semicolon;
            (2) at the end of paragraph (2), by striking the period and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) the statement required under section 12(b)(4).''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this Act shall apply 
with respect to transactions effected on or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Thomas Sanchez Rae, * From the 244th District

 Court of Ector County,

 Trial Court No. C-39,078.

Vs. No. 11-14-00334-CR * July 2, 2015

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

 This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the 

appeal should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
James Benjamin BARSTAD, Petitioner, v. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.

No. 19-7801.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Nicholas Bradley GILBERT, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9589

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Rehaif* v. *United States* , 588 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 2191, 204 L.Ed.2d 594 (2019).
================================================================================
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Azul Studios  International Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
James Vandeberg, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By: /s/ James Vandeberg
------------------------
James Vandeberg
Chief Financial Officer

January 6, 2005
David M. ROBINSON, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, FORT DIX FCI, et al.

No. 19-5661.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Nov. 18, 2019.

*550Petition for rehearing denied.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1138 

To direct the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to establish 

a loan guarantee program to assist small business concerns that manufacture clean energy technologies in the United States, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2013 

Ms. MATSUI (for herself, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, Ms. LEE of 

California, Mr. HONDA, and Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small 

Business 

A BILL 

To direct the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to establish a loan guarantee program to assist 

small business concerns that manufacture clean energy 

technologies in the United States, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Clean 

5 Energy Financing Act of 2013’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 1138 IH

1 SEC. 2. CLEAN ENERGY TECHNOLOGY LOAN GUARANTEE 

2 PROGRAM. 

3 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Administrator of the 

4 Small Business Administration shall establish a program 

5 under which the Administrator is authorized to guarantee 

6 the loans of small business concerns that manufacture a 

7 clean energy technology in the United States. 

8 (b) ADMINISTRATION.—Except as otherwise specified 

9 in this section and to the extent practicable, the Adminis10 trator shall carry out the program under subsection (a) 

11 in a manner similar to the loan program under section 

12 7(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)). 

13 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the following defi14 nitions apply: 

15 (1) CLEAN ENERGY TECHNOLOGY.—The term 

16 ‘‘clean energy technology’’ means a technology re17 lated to the production, use, transmission, storage, 

18 control, or conservation of energy that will con19 tribute to a stabilization of atmospheric greenhouse 

20 gas concentrations through reduction, avoidance, or 

21 sequestration of energy-related emissions and— 

22 (A) reduce the need for additional energy 

23 supplies by using existing energy supplies with 

24 greater efficiency or by transmitting, distrib25 uting, or transporting energy with greater effecmstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 1138 IH

1 tiveness through the infrastructure of the 

2 United States; or 

3 (B) diversify the sources of the energy sup4 ply of the United States to strengthen energy 

5 security and to increase supplies with a favor6 able balance of environmental effects if the en7 tire technology system is considered. 

8 (2) SMALL BUSINESS CONCERN.—The term 

9 ‘‘small business concern’’ has the meaning given 

10 that term under section 3(a) of the Small Business 

11 Act (15 U.S.C. 632(a)). 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2018195EN.01000602.xml

| 7.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8771 — Total/Engie (Part of Liquefied Natural Gas Business))

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 195/03)

On 11 April 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8771. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8771. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Electronic Tax Administration Advisory Committee (ETAAC) will hold a public meeting on Wednesday, June 29, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. Sean Parman, Office of National Public Liaison, at 202-317-6247 or send an email to                         *PublicLiaison@irs.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988), that a public meeting of the ETAAC will be held on Wednesday, June 29, 2022, from 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. EDT at 1111 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC, 20224. The purpose of the ETAAC is to provide continuing advice regarding the development and implementation of the IRS organizational strategy for electronic tax administration. ETAAC is an organized public forum for discussion of electronic tax administration issues such as prevention of identity theft and refund fraud. It supports the overriding goal that paperless filing should be the preferred and most convenient method of filing tax and information returns. ETAAC members convey the public's perceptions of IRS electronic tax administration activities, offer constructive observations about current or proposed policies, programs and procedures, and suggest improvements. Due to limited seating and security requirements, call or email Sean Parman to confirm your attendance. Mr. Parman can be reached at 202-317-6247 or                     *PublicLiaison@irs.gov.*                     Should you wish the ETAAC to consider a written statement, please call 202-317-6247 or email:                     *PublicLiaison@irs.gov.*

Dated: June 8, 2022

Nina M. Lachin,

Acting Branch Chief, National Public Liaison.

[FR Doc. 2022-12705 Filed 6-10-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/08/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       64,992
COMMITMENTS
   1,328   11,787    2,541   61,118   50,481   64,987   64,809        5      183

CHANGES FROM 04/01/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     11,017)
     251    4,698      506   10,260    5,813   11,017   11,017        0        0

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     2.0     18.1      3.9     94.0     77.7    100.0     99.7      0.0      0.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       33)
       4        6        5       15       17       21       27`

---

Updated April 11, 2014
Dawud SPAULDING, Petitioner v. OHIO

No. 19-5592

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 21, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio denied.
United Technologies Corporation Employee Stock Option Plan


 Exhibit 10.13 
  
 UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 
 EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION PLAN 
  
 Amendment 1 
  
 Whereas, the Board of Directors wishes to
amend the United Technologies Corporation Employee Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”) to limit the total number of shares to be offered under the Plan to 20,000,000; 
  
 Now therefore, the Plan is hereby amended, effective January 1, 2003, as follows: 
  
 Section 6 of the Plan is amended and restated as follows: 
  
 Limitation on Number of Shares 
  
 The number of shares with respect to which Stock Option Awards may be issued may not exceed:
(i) four million shares of Common Stock in any calendar year; and (ii) twenty million shares in total with respect to awards made on and after January 1, 2003. The foregoing limitations shall be subject to adjustment as provided for in Section 10
hereof. 
  

			
	UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
	
	  
	 William H. Trachsel
 Sr. Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary

		
	 Attest:
	 	  
	
	 Richard M. Kaplan
 Date: June 27,
2003
Harrison GARCIA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8005.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Lakshmi ARUNACHALAM, Petitioner v. PAZUNIAK LAW OFFICE, LLC, et al.

No. 18-9115

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Huntsman LLC (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter R. Huntsman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| |  | /s/PETER R. HUNTSMANPeter R. Huntsman Chief Executive
OfficerAugust 16, 2004
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

---



QuickLinks
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ZEV ABRAHAM LENCHUS

, Appellant,

v.

ANNA YAROVICH LENCHUS

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 22

- 1774

[ August 10, 2023 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seven teenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Linda A. Alley , Judge; L.T. Case No. FMCE21015183

.

Laura Davis Smith and Sonja A. Jean of Davis Smith & Jean, LLC

, Coral Gables , for appellant.

Darius Asly , Miami Beach , for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

K LINGENSMITH

, C.J., C ONNER and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Angel PAZ-ALVAREZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8218.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 4, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Augustine PACHECO, et al., Petitioners v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.

No. 19-341

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 105 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 105

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the mandate that 
                 individuals purchase health insurance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2013

 Mr. Garrett introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the mandate that 
                 individuals purchase health insurance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reclaiming Individual Liberty Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF INDIVIDUAL HEALTH INSURANCE MANDATE.

    Section 5000A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as added by the 
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, is amended by adding at the 
end the following new subsection:
    ``(h) Termination.--This section shall not apply with respect to 
any month beginning after the date of the enactment of this 
subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```