alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PIERO A. BUGONI, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

GOOGLE, INC.; MICROSOFT 

CORPORATION; YAHOO! INC., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 21-15360 

D.C. No. 4:20-cv-02883-HSG 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2022**

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Piero A. Bugoni appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing 

his action alleging violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act and defamation 

against search engine operators. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. 

We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Watison v. Carter, 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 21-15360 

668 F.3d 1108, 1112 (9th Cir. 2012). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Bugoni’s action because defendants 

have immunity for publishing third party content under the Communications 

Decency Act. See 47 U.S.C. § 230(c); Zango, Inc. v. Kaspersky Lab, Inc., 568 

F.3d 1169, 1174 (9th Cir. 2009) (affirming dismissal of action for injunctive relief 

where the defendant “is a provider of an ‘interactive computer service’ as defined 

in the Communications Decency Act of 1996”).

AFFIRMED.
Charles Randall HARRISON, Petitioner, v. Raul MALDONADO.

No. 19-5509

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
Twila HAYNES, Petitioner v. ASSETS PROTECTION, INC.

No. 19-6215

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office denied.
** **

**Exhibit 32.1**

**WRITTEN STATEMENT**

**OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER**

The undersigned hereby certify that the Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2006 filed by TNS, Inc. with theSecurities and Exchange Commission fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the issuer.

Dated:July 21, 2006
| /s/ JOHN J. MCDONNELL, JR.                                       |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| John J. McDonnell, Jr.                                      |   |   |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                             |   |   |
|                                                             |   |   |
| Dated: July 21, 2006                                        |   |   |
|                                                             |   |   |
| /s/ HENRY H. GRAHAM, JR.                                         |   |   |
| Henry H. Graham, Jr.                                        |   |   |
| Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer  and Treasurer |   |   |

 

----
# C_2017064EN.01000301.xml

| 28.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/3

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures against Belarus apply

(2017/C 64/03)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 (2).

2

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 765/2006.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with Section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (3).

3

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 134, 20.5.2006, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

3

---
JUDGMENT

Court of Appeals 

 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-14-00713-CV

MOHAMED FARRAG, Appellant

V.

DANIELLE BRYAN, Appellee

Appeal from the 280th District Court of Harris County (Tr. Ct. No. 2014-38348)

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on July 29, 2014. 

Appellant, Mohamed Farrag, did not timely file a brief. After being notified that this 

appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. It is therefore 

CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED, and ORDERED that the appeal be dismissed for want 

of prosecution.

It is further ORDERED that appellant pay all costs incurred by reason of this 

appeal. 

It is further ORDERED that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered January 22, 2015.

Judgment rendered by panel consisting of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and 

Huddle.
COURT OF APPEALS FOIl TIlE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

MEMORANDUM ORDER 

### Appellate case name: In re Vikas Anand, Raymond Drennon, and Radha Thiagarajan 

### Appellate case number: 01-12-01106-CV Trial court case number: 1023395 Trial court: County Court at Law No. 2 of Harris County Relators have filed a motion for emergency relief, seeking a stay of the trial court’s December 4, 2.0!2 order requiring production of.documents by December 13, 2012 and setting relators’ depositions for December 18, 2012. This court grants the emergency relief and stays the production of documents and depositions until further order of this court. The court requests a response to the petition for writ of mandamus. The response, if any, must be filed by January 4, 2t)13. 

### It ~s so ORDERED. Judge’s signature: Is/Rebeca Huddle

[] Acting individually [] Acting for the Court

Date: December 12, 2012
Exhibit 31.b

I, Marc N. Teal, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund V L.P.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





|February 14, 2008 | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|----------------- | ---------------------------
|                  | Marc N. Teal               
|                  | Principal Financial Officer
|                  |
Thiodore Igorovich GALITSA, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6597

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Marcus JACKSON, Petitioner, v. Vance LAUGHLIN, Warden, et al.

No. 19-5791

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.
| 1. | I am a duly authorized officer of BMW Financial Services NA, LLC; |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | I have reviewed the terms of that certain Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of January 24, 2018 (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”), among BMW Financial Services NA,                  LLC, as seller, servicer (in such capacity, the “Servicer”), administrator and custodian, U.S. Bank National Association, as indenture trustee, BMW FS Securities LLC, as depositor, and BMW Vehicle Owner Trust 2018-A, as issuer, and I have                  made, or have caused to be made under my supervision, a review of the activities of the Servicer and the performance of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement during the period from January 24, 2018 to December 31, 2018;                  and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | to the best of my knowledge, based on the review described in paragraph 2 above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in                  all material respects during the period from January 24, 2018 to December 31, 2018. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1116 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1116

      To require the approval of a majority of a public company's 
 shareholders for any expenditure by that company to influence public 
 opinion on matters not related to the company's products or services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 13, 2013

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To require the approval of a majority of a public company's 
 shareholders for any expenditure by that company to influence public 
 opinion on matters not related to the company's products or services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``End the Hijacking of Shareholder 
Funds Act''.

SEC. 2. SHAREHOLDER APPROVAL FOR CERTAIN EXPENDITURES.

    Any expenditure by a public company to influence public opinion on 
matters not related to the company's products or services that has not 
been approved by a majority of the votes cast by shareholders to 
approve or disapprove such expenditure shall be considered a breach of 
a fiduciary duty of the officers and directors who authorized such an 
expenditure. The officers and directors who authorize such an 
expenditure without first obtaining such approval of shareholders shall 
be jointly and severally liable in any action brought in any court of 
competent jurisdiction to any shareholder or class of shareholders for 
the amount of such expenditure.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

    As used in this Act--
            (1) the term ``public company'' means any issuer that is 
        required to submit periodical or other reports under section 13 
        of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
            (2) the term ``shareholder'' means any person who owns or 
        holds a share of stock in a public company.
                                 <all>
```
FRIENDS OF DANNY DEVITO, et al., Applicants, v. Tom WOLF, Governor of Pennsylvania, et al.

No. 19A1032.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 6, 2020

Application for stay presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the Court denied.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERREDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC.PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(CHAPTER 98, TITLE 15 U.S.C. SS. 7241)**

I, Steven J.Janusek, certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc.;

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                 Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; and

4.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)               Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)              Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)               Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):

a)               All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)              Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.
| Date: April 28, 2006                   |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|
| /s/ STEVEN J. JANUSEK                       |   |
| Steven J.  Janusek, Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
Leighton Martin CURTIS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5705.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 10.2

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

INTERCARD, INC.   (MAKER)

                                                                     $500,000.00

                                                                 August 31, 2000

For Value Received, We Promise to Pay to the Order of:


                    RAY SHERROD & MARY LOIS SHERROD (HOLDERS)
                               26 BROADVIEW DRIVE
                             CLAYTON, MISSOURI 63105


the sum of Five Hundred Thousand  Dollars,  with interest thereon at the rate of
6.00 percent per annum  compounded  annually,  and on all past due principal and
interest from its maturity,  at the same rate until paid. Interest is payable in
full at  maturity.  If this note is not paid when due and is placed in the hands
of an attorney for  collection,  or if collected  through  bankruptcy or probate
proceedings,  we agree  to pay  reasonable  attorney's  fees  additional  on the
principal and interest then owing.

The holders may  rearrange,  adjust and extend the times and amounts of payments
of interest and principal of this Note without  notice to, consent of or without
releasing any party liable hereon.

The amount of the  principal  hereof may be prepaid at any time,  provided  that
interest to date has been paid in full, without penalty.


Address: Intercard, Inc.
                  45-B Progress Parkway
                  Maryland Heights, MO  63043


Maker:   _______________________________
                  Intercard, Inc.


Holder:  _______________________________
                  Ray Sherrod


         _______________________________
                  Mary Lois Sherrod



                                EXHIBIT 10.2 - 1
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q REPORT  OF  REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC.  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  (CHAPTER 63, TITLE 18 U.S.C.
SS.SS. 1350(a) AND (b))

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350(a) and (b)), the
undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: October 22, 2009/s/ STEVEN J. JANUSEK Steven J. Janusek,
Chief Financial Officer


The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350(a) and (b)), is not
a part of the Form 10-Q to which it refers and is, to the extent permitted by law, provided by the above signatory to the extent of his knowledge.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Lawrence T. TYLER, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6049

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Alfred LAM, et al., Petitioners, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, et al.

No. 19-380

Supreme Court of the United States.

Nov. 12, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Opinion Research Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John F. Short, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                   |  |  |  |         |  |                                     
|------------------ |  |  |  | ------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: May 15, 2006 |  |  |  | Signed: |  | /s/ John F. Short                   
|                   |  |  |  | Name:   |  | John F. Short                       
|                   |  |  |  | Title:  |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer