alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018308EN.01000301.xml

| 31.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 308/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 308/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9058 — Sonae/Sonae Sierra)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 308/02)

On 23 August 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9058. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9058. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
February 14, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

WILLIAM T. DRENNEN III, Appellant

NO. 14-10-01099-CV V.

EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, Appellee

____________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Exxon Mobil Corporation, 

signed November 11, 2010, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected 

the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore order the judgment of the court 

below REVERSED and REMAND the cause for proceedings in accordance with the 

court's opinion.

We order appellee, Exxon Mobil Corporation, to pay all costs incurred in this 

appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
IIA 

Calendar No. 232 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 99 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 31, 2013 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar, pursuant to Sec. 1002 of 

Public Law 113–46 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Relating to the disapproval of the President’s exercise of 

authority to suspend the debt limit, as submitted under 

section 1002(b) of the Continuing Appropriations Act, 

2014 on October 17, 2013. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves of the President’s exercise of 

4 authority to suspend the debt limit, as exercised pursuant 

5 to the certification under section 1002(b) of the Con6 tinuing Appropriations Act, 2014. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 30, 

2013. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 232 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 99 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Relating to the disapproval of the President’s exer2013. tinuing Appropriations Act, 2014 on October 17, submitted under section 1002(b) of the Con- cise of authority to suspend the debt limit, as 

OCTOBER 31, 2013 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar, 

pursuant to Sec. 1002 of Public Law 113–46 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Mojisola POPOOLA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7128

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
CANVS CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. Barbara M. BARRETT, Secretary of the Air Force.

No. 19-1198.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 4, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.1

I, Michael C. Mauer, Chief Executive Officer of CM Credit Opportunities BDC I Inc. certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CM Credit Opportunities BDC I Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: September 4, 2018



| |  |                                         
| |  | ----------------------------------------
| |  | /s/    Michael C.
Mauer                 
| |  | Michael C. Mauer
Chief Executive Officer
Thomas LEWIS, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES;

Derrick Young, Petitioner v. United States.

No. 19-5401

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 09/17/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       32,848
COMMITMENTS
   2,432    3,531    2,685   27,140   26,544   32,257   32,760      591       88

CHANGES FROM 09/10/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -696)
     716     -976      250   -2,181       30   -1,215     -696      519        0

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     7.4     10.7      8.2     82.6     80.8     98.2     99.7      1.8      0.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       37)
       9        7        7       15       18       25       31`

---

Updated September 20, 2013
Julio Cesar PACHECO-ASTRUDILLO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7104.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 6, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Eastern District of Texas

R2 Solutions LLC

4:23-cv-01147

Databricks, Inc.

Databricks, Inc.

c/o United Agent Group Inc.

5444 Westheimer

#1000

Houston, TX 77056

Edward R. Nelson III

Nelson Bumgardner Conroy PC

3131 West 7th Street, Suite 300

Fort Worth, Texas 76107

12/28/2023

Case 4:23-cv-01147-ALM Document 4 Filed 12/28/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 111
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

4:23-cv-01147

0.00

Case 4:23-cv-01147-ALM Document 4 Filed 12/28/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 112
Leo CHADWICK, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7979.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 4, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Order entered May 1 1 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 16
- 00434
- CR
NICHOLAS JOHN MATEIK , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Cou rt Cause No. F15
- 44643
- R



### O RDER
The Court GRANTS appellant’s May 6, 2016 motion to substitute counsel. F. Clinton Broden is substituted for Riann Christine Moore and the Dallas County Public Defender’s Office as appellant’s counsel of record.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send all correspondence to F. Clinton Broden, Broden & Mickelsen, 2600 State Street, Dallas, Texas 75204; telephone: (214) 720

- 9552; facsimile: (214)
720

- 9594.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
# C_2018260EN.01000201.xml

| 24.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8660 — Fortum/Uniper)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 260/02)

On 15 June 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8660. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8660. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Willie J. TRIMBLE, Jr., Petitioner, v. Mathew HANSEN, Warden, et al.

No. 19-5068

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 12**

**J.B. POINDEXTERAND SUBSIDIARIES****COMPUTATIONOF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**(in thousands,except ratios)
| ** **                                                                                            | ** ** | **Year ended December 31,** | ** ** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------------------|------------|
| **Earnings**                                                                                          | ** ** | **2002**                                   | ** ** | **2003** | ** ** | **2004** | ** ** | **2005** | ** ** | **2006** | ** ** |
| Pre-tax income from  continuing operations                                                            |       | (6.7                                       | )          | 12.0 |   | 14.5 |   | 7.7 |   | 12.7 |   |
| Add: Fixed charges (see  below)                                                                       |       | 15.5                                       |       | 15.3 |   | 17.0 |   | 21.1 |   | 21.5 |   |
| Add: Amortization of  capitalized interest                                                            |       | —                                     |       | — |   | — |   | — |   | — |   |
| Less: Capitalized  interest                                                                           |       |                                       |       | — |   | — |   | — |   | — |   |
|                                                                                                  |       | 8.8                                        |       | 27.3 |   | 31.5 |   | 28.8 |   | 34.2 |   |
| Fixed charges                                                                                         |       |                                       |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest, either expensed  or capitalized, and amortized capitalized expenses related to indebtedness |       | 12.5                                       |       | 12.4 |   | 14.4 |   | 18.5 |   | 18.9 |   |
| An estimate of the  interest within lease expense                                                     |       | 3.0                                        |       | 2.9 |   | 2.6 |   | 2.6 |   | 2.6 |   |
|                                                                                                  |       | 15.5                                       |       | 15.3 |   | 17.0 |   | 21.1 |   | 21.5 |   |
|                                                                                                  |       |                                       |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (A/B)                                                              |       | —                                     | (1         | 1.8x |   | 1.9x |   | 1.4x |   | 1.6x |   |

 

(1)         Earnings wereinsufficient to cover fixed charges by $6.9 million for the year endedDecember 31, 2002.

78

----
EXHIBIT 99

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ultimate Electronics, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
April 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|/s/J. EDWARD MCENTIREJ. Edward McEntire
Chief Executive Officer
June 13, 2003 |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ALAN E. KESSOCKAlan E. Kessock
Chief Financial Officer
June 13, 2003       |  | 



QuickLinks
The E COMPANY, et al., Petitioners v. TRUSTEES OF the SUBURBAN TEAMSTERS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS PENSION FUND

No. 19-170

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 21, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
James H. GRIFFIN, Petitioner, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 19-7356

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (a) | A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from October 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 has been made under my supervision. |

|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (b) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period. |

|                                                                                                                          |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                          |
| /s/ Sumito Mulchandani                                                                                                   |
| Sumito MulchandaniAssistant Treasurer ofFord Motor Credit Company LLC,as Servicer of Ford Credit Auto Lease Trust 2017-B |
1

 The district court ordered that all motions, orders, and subpoenas filed in the instant cause were

to be applicable in cause number 03-111-K368. Therefore, those documents should be included in

the clerk’s record in our cause number 03-03-00460-CR. 

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-03-00473-CR

James Thomas LaPointe, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 368TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 01-1067-K368, HONORABLE BURT CARNES, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

In November 2001,JamesThomasLaPointewasindicted in this cause for aggravated

sexual assault and aggravated kidnapping. In February 2003, he was reindicted in local cause

number 03-111-K368 for the same offenses, plus an additional count. The earlier cause was

dismissed after he was convicted in the latter cause. LaPointe filed a notice of appeal under both

cause numbers. 

Because there was no judgment of conviction or other appealable order in the instant

cause, there is nothing to appeal and our jurisdiction is not invoked. The State’s motion to dismiss

this appeal is granted. This does not affect LaPointe’s appeal from the judgment of conviction in

cause number 03-111-K368, our cause number 03-03-00460-CR.1
2

The appeal is dismissed.

 

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear

Dismissed

Filed: August 29, 2003

Do Not Publish
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending
December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick J. Moore, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|/s/PATRICK J. MOOREPatrick J. Moore
President and Chief Executive Officer | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|March 10, 2003                                                            | 

---

QuickLinks
Jorel SHOPHAR, Petitioner, v. KANSAS, et al.

No. 19-254

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10A-1

                               NORDSON CORPORATION

                            1995 MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE
                                COMPENSATION PLAN

                      ELIGIBLE POSITIONS FOR 2003 PLAN YEAR


o    President and Chief Executive Officer

o    Executive Vice President

o    Sr. Vice President

o    Vice President(s)

o    Vice President - Finance and Controller

o    Vice President - Human Resources