alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018437EN.01000101.xml

| 4.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 437/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 437/1

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case M.8947 — Nidec/Whirlpool (Embraco Business))

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 437/01)

On 28 November 2018, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the abovementioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the internal market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference No M.8947 — Nidec/Whirlpool (Embraco Business), to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---
RECORD IMPOUNDED

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-4927-17T1

SKILA HOLDING, INC., n/k/a

SKILA HOLDING, LLC,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

QPHARMA, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

___________________________

Submitted March 20, 2019 – Decided April 1, 2019

Before Judges Koblitz, Currier, and Mayer. 

On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law

Division, Morris County, Docket No. L-0166-18.

Riker Danzig Scherer Hyland & Perretti, LLP, 

attorneys for appellant (Frank J. Vitolo, of counsel and 

on the briefs; Jonathan M. Sandler and Dylan C. 

Goetsch, on the briefs).

Naim S. Surgeon (Akerman LLP), attorney for 

respondent.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the 

internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.
2

A-4927-17T1

PER CURIAM

We were advised prior to argument that this matter was settled, and the 

parties have executed a stipulation of dismissal of this appeal. Accordingly, the 

appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs. 

Dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Crossmann Communities, Inc.
Exhibit 27.1
Article 5 Financial Data Schedule for 1999 1st Quarter 10-Q
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1138958
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  232014970
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         7552082
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3560183
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               286670342
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      110152666
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      65154710
<OTHER-SE>                                    89160300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 286670342
<SALES>                                       90416073
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              90416073
<CGS>                                         72316290
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 72316290
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              475600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                6724144
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2689822
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            4034322
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   4034322
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .34
        

</TABLE>
Julian MARTIN, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 18-1506

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 21, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Darries Leon JACKSON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5878

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

RAHOOL AMIN MAKANI

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NUMBER 4:23-CR-00159

ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY

The court referred this matter to the United States Magistrate Judge for administration of a 

guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a 

hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the court accept 

Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on Count One of the Information.

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings.

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of 

the United States Magistrate Judge. The court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance 

of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report.

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the court finds Defendant Rahool Amin 

Makani GUILTY of Count One of the Information, charging a violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 

1956(a)(1)(B)(i) – Laundering of Monetary Instruments and Aiding and Abetting.

Case 4:23-cr-00159-ALM-AGD Document 14 Filed 08/16/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 53
Case 4:23-cr-00159-ALM-AGD Document 14 Filed 08/16/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 54
# C_2018370EN.01000101.xml

| 12.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 370/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 370/1

---

RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 4 October 2018

to the Council of the European Union on the external auditors of Lietuvos bankas

(ECB/2018/23)

(2018/C 370/01)

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 27.1 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and the national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and the national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union.

| (2) | The mandate of Lietuvos bankas’ current external auditors, UAB PricewaterhouseCoopers, ended following the audit for the financial year 2017. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The mandate of Lietuvos bankas’ current external auditors, UAB PricewaterhouseCoopers, ended following the audit for the financial year 2017.

| (3) | By Recommendation ECB/2018/15 of the European Central Bank (1), the ECB recommended that UAB Deloitte Lietuva be appointed as external auditors of Lietuvos bankas for the financial years 2018 to 2021. UAB Deloitte Lietuva did not take up the appointment and it is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2018. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

By Recommendation ECB/2018/15 of the European Central Bank (1), the ECB recommended that UAB Deloitte Lietuva be appointed as external auditors of Lietuvos bankas for the financial years 2018 to 2021. UAB Deloitte Lietuva did not take up the appointment and it is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2018.

| (4) | Lietuvos bankas has selected UAB Ernst & Young Baltic as its external auditors for the financial years 2018 to 2021, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Lietuvos bankas has selected UAB Ernst & Young Baltic as its external auditors for the financial years 2018 to 2021,

HAS ADOPTED THIS RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that UAB Ernst & Young Baltic should be appointed as the external auditors of Lietuvos bankas for the financial years 2018 to 2021.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 4 October 2018.

The President of the ECB

Mario DRAGHI

---

(1)  Recommendation ECB/2018/15 of the European Central Bank of 18 May 2018 to the Council of the European Union on the external auditors of Lietuvos bankas (OJ C 181, 28.5.2018, p. 1).

1

---
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Vanette Jolly, * From the 104th District Court

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 27457-B.

Vs. No. 11-20-00061-CV * December 30, 2021

Jeff Johnson and Robbie Johnson, * Memorandum Opinion by Trotter, J.

(Panel consists of: Trotter, J.,

Williams, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

 sitting by assignment)

 (Bailey, C.J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion,

the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial 

court for further proceedings. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed 

against Jeff Johnson and Robbie Johnson.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

__________________________________________ ) DJAMEL AMEZIANE, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 05-392 (ESH) ) BARACK OBAMA, et al. , ) UNDER SEAL ) ) Respondents. ) __________________________________________)

ORDER For the reasons stated in the accompanyi ng Memorandum Opinion [Dkt. No. 364], it is hereby ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for ha beas relief [Dkt. No. 351] is DENIED ; it is further ORDERED that respondents’ motion to dismiss [Dkt. No. 358] is GRANTED ; and it is further ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED

. SO ORDERED.

/s/ ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE United States District Judge Date: July 21, 2014
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1036 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1036

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
103 Center Street West in Eatonville, Washington, as the ``National Park 
                 Ranger Margaret Anderson Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. NATIONAL PARK RANGER MARGARET ANDERSON POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 103 Center Street West in Eatonville, Washington, shall be 
known and designated as the ``National Park Ranger Margaret Anderson 
Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``National 
Park Ranger Margaret Anderson Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is herebymade to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1,2017, by and among CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC., as Depositor,WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITALADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asTrustee, CITIBANK, N.A., as Certificate Administrator and PARK BRIDGE LENDERSERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer withrespect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2017-CD5 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section10.08 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President ofCommercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of theactivities of the Master Servicer during the period from August 1, 2017 throughDecember 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per theAgreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2. To the best ofmy knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all ofits obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February2018.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive VicePresident 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo)  Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Curtis Dion EARLEY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8071.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# C_2018015EN.01000501.xml

| 17.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 15/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 15/5

---

Special Report No 2/2018

‘The operational efficiency of the ECB’s crisis management for banks’

(2018/C 15/05)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 2/2018 ‘The operational efficiency of the ECB’s crisis management for banks’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu

---
# C_2018403EN.01001101.xml

| 9.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 403/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 403/11

---

Special Report No 28/2018

‘The majority of simplification measures brought into Horizon 2020 have made life easier for beneficiaries, but opportunities to improve still exist’

(2018/C 403/07)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 28/2018 ‘The majority of simplification measures brought into Horizon 2020 have made life easier for beneficiaries, but opportunities to improve still exist’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website (http://eca.europa.eu).

---
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Azul Studios  International Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, James
Vandeberg,  President,  Chief  Executive  Officer and  Director of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/James Vandeberg
-----------------------------------------------
James Vandeberg
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

September 29, 2004
# C_2020028EN.01015401.xml

| 27.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 28/154 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 28/154

---

P8_TA(2018)0249

Composition of the European Parliament ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 June 2018 on the draft European Council decision establishing the composition of the European Parliament (00007/2018 – C8-0216/2018 – 2017/0900(NLE))

(Consent)

(2020/C 28/19)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the draft European Council decision (00007/2018), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft European Council decision (00007/2018),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the European Council in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 14(2) of the Treaty on European Union (C8-0216/2018), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the European Council in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 14(2) of the Treaty on European Union (C8-0216/2018),

| — | having regard to its resolution of 7 February 2018 on the composition of the European Parliament and to its proposal for a decision of the European Council annexed thereto (1), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to its resolution of 7 February 2018 on the composition of the European Parliament and to its proposal for a decision of the European Council annexed thereto (1),

| — | having regard to Rule 99(1) and (4) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 99(1) and (4) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs (A8-0207/2018), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs (A8-0207/2018),

| 1. | Gives its consent to the draft European Council decision; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the European Council and, for information, to the Commission and to the governments and parliaments of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

---

(1)  Texts adopted, P8_TA(2018)0029.

---
Clinton L. SIDES, et ux., Petitioners, v. CENTRAL KANSAS CONSERVANCY, INC.

No. 19-1107.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 4, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Kansas denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/18/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       67,522
COMMITMENTS
  20,912    5,366    2,447   28,351   45,297   51,710   53,110   15,812   14,412

CHANGES FROM 03/11/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      4,216)
   2,045      433     -556    2,020    3,055    3,509    2,932      707    1,284

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    31.0      7.9      3.6     42.0     67.1     76.6     78.7     23.4     21.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       84)
      33       10       14       29       30       69       48
```

----

Updated March 21, 2014
Lucas James MOSS v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7914. R46-017

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 2, 2020

The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46 of the Rules of this Court.
Lakshmi ARUNACHALAM, Petitioner v. PAZUNIAK LAW OFFICE, LLC, et al.

No. 18-9115

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Delaware denied.
Emory CHILES, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5801

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 20 

Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony to award 

the Congressional Gold Medal to Professor Muhamad Yunus. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 4, 2013 

Mr. HOLT submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on House Administration 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony to award the Congressional Gold Medal to Professor Muhamad Yunus. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF ROTUNDA FOR CEREMONY TO AWARD 

4 CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL TO PRO5 FESSOR MUHAMAD YUNUS. 

6 The rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used 

7 on April 17, 2013, for a ceremony to award the Congres8 sional Gold Medal to Professor Muhamad Yunus in rec9 ognition of his contributions to the fight against global 

10 poverty. Physical preparations for the ceremony shall be 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 20 IH 

1 carried out in accordance with such conditions as the Ar2 chitect of the Capitol may prescribe. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Randall Duane THRONEBERRY, Petitioner, v. OKLAHOMA.

No. 19-7961.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma denied.
IN RE Otis B. BRASCOM, Petitioner

No. 19-5288

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for *332a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petition in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin* v. *District of Columbia Court of Appeals* , 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (*per curiam* ).