alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Clive Barwin, certify that:
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Melt Inc.; |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------|

2.            Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.            Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.             I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and I have:

a)             designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)            evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c)             disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

5.             I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)             all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)            any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Dated:  March 29, 2007

 

 

/s/ Clive Barwin                                              

Clive Barwin, President, CEO and Secretary 

(Principal Executive Officer)
• To qualify for the Letter rate, UPS Express Envelopes may only contain

Domestic Ship ents

Visit theupsstore.com to find a location near you.

those listed or weighing more than 8 oz. will be billed by weight.

weigh 8 oz. or less. UPS Express Envelopes containin items other than

correspondence, urgent documents, and/or electronic media, and must

• The UPS Express Envelope may be used only for documents of no commercial

International Shipments

ups.com/importexport to verify if your shipment is classified as a document.

value. Certain countries consider electronic media as documents. Visit

• To qualify for the Letter rate, the UPS Express Envelope must weigh 8 oz. or less.

UPS Express Envelopes weighing more than 8 oz. will be billed by weight. 

or cash equivalent.

containing sensitive personal information or breakable items. Do not send cash

Note: Express Envelopes are not recommended for shipments of electronic media

International Shipping Notice Carriage hereunder may be subject to the rules relatin to l ability and other terms and/or conditions established by the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relatin to Internationa

¦¦ rnntract for the International Carria e of Goo s by Road (the CMR Convention ). These co mo ities, technology or soft are were exported from the U.S. in accor ance with the Export Adm nistration Re

Case 4:24-cv-00135-ALM-BD Document 38-1 Filed 11/12/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:

157
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-10-00023-CV

______________________________

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF

ENESHA TANSHELL THOMPSON CARPENTER

AND KEVIN JAMESON CARPENTER AND

IN THE INTEREST OF A CHILD

 

On Appeal from the 321st Judicial District Court

Smith County, Texas

Trial Court No. 09-2331-D

 

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Kevin Jameson Carpenter filed his notice of appeal pro se March 3, 2010.1

The clerk’s record was filed April 8, 2010. No timely request was made in writing at or 

before the time for perfecting the appeal for the preparation of a reporter’s record, as required by 

TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6. Therefore, appellant’s brief was due June 4, 2010. 

When neither a brief nor a motion to extend time for filing the same had been filed by 

June 24, 2010, we contacted appellant by letter and informed him that if a brief had not been filed 

by July 9, 2010, the appeal would be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).

No brief has been filed, and appellant has taken no other action in pursuit of his appeal. 

Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice

Date Submitted: July 26, 2010

Date Decided: July 27, 2010

 

1Originally appealed to the Twelfth Court of Appeals, this case was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme 

Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (Vernon 2005).
# C_2017413EN.01000502.xml

| 5.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 413/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 413/5

---

Commission notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 413/05)

| Member State | Czech Republic |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Brno (Czech Republic)-Munich (Germany) |
| Period of validity of the contract | Approximately 25 March 2018-24 March 2022 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | 20 February 2018 |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained | For further information please contact:





  CÍSAŘ, ČEŠKA, SMUTNÝ s.r.o., advokátní kancelář |
| Hvězdova 1716/2b |
| 140 00 Praha 4 |
| CZECH REPUBLIC |
| Tel. +420 224827884 |
| Fax +420 224827879 |
| hrstka@akccs.cz |
| www.akccs.cz |

Member State

Czech Republic

Route concerned

Brno (Czech Republic)-Munich (Germany)

Period of validity of the contract

Approximately 25 March 2018-24 March 2022

Deadline for submission of tenders

20 February 2018

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained

For further information please contact:

CÍSAŘ, ČEŠKA, SMUTNÝ s.r.o., advokátní kancelář

Hvězdova 1716/2b

140 00 Praha 4

CZECH REPUBLIC

Tel. +420 224827884

Fax +420 224827879

hrstka@akccs.cz

www.akccs.cz

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6259

JUAN FITZGERALD ALLEN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JAMES B. HUNT, JR.; RALPH STAMEY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District

Judge. (CA-96-72-F)

Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: July 31, 1996

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Juan Fitzgerald Allen, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Allen v. Hunt, No. CA-96-72-F (E.D.N.C. Feb. 7, 1996). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000887428
<NAME> SMITH BARNEY ADJUSTABLE RATE GOVERNMENT INCOME FUND

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                      155,616,757
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                     154,075,511
<RECEIVABLES>                               26,299,972
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                 202,810
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             180,578,293
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                     3,743,390
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                   44,412,962
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                         48,156,352
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                      0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                   141,037,841
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                        3,148,378
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                        2,583,524
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                     (88,672)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                    (6,870,071)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                   (1,657,157)
<NET-ASSETS>                               132,421,941
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                                    0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                            8,781,850
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                               2,023,336
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                      6,758,514
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                         6,845
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                  (1,283,470)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                        5,481,889
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                    1,708,617
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                           74,756
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                     76,454,564
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                 72,552,616
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                          1,551,994
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                       7,530,564
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                       (60,564)
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                  (6,724,283)
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                          822,791
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                              2,023,336
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                        31,835,880
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                             9.78
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                   0.52
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                         (0.08)
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                              0.54
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                         0.00
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                              0.02
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                               9.66
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                   2.22



</TABLE>
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 3 

Expressing the sense of Congress that the use of offensive military force 

by a President without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Congress constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under 

article II, section 4 of the Constitution. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2013 

Mr. JONES submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that the use of offensive 

military force by a President without prior and clear 

authorization of an Act of Congress constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, 

section 4 of the Constitution. 

Whereas the cornerstone of the Republic is honoring Congress’ exclusive power to declare war under article I, section 8, clause 11 of the Constitution: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that, except 

3 in response to an actual or imminent attack against the 

4 territory of the United States, the use of offensive military 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HCON 3 IH 

1 force by a President without prior and clear authorization 

2 of an Act of Congress violates Congress’ exclusive power 

3 to declare war under article I, section 8, clause 11 of the 

4 Constitution and therefore constitutes an impeachable 

5 high crime and misdemeanor under article II, section 4 

6 of the Constitution. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with
III 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 106 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 28, 2014 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol 

Visitor Center for a ceremony to award Congressional 

Gold Medals in honor of the men and women who perished as a result of the terrorist attacks on the United 

States on September 11, 2001. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR GOLD 

4 MEDAL CEREMONY IN HONOR OF FALLEN 

5 HEROES OF 9/11. 

6 Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center is 

7 authorized to be used on September 10, 2014, for a 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HCON 106 RDS 

1 ceremony to award Congressional Gold Medals in honor 

2 of the men and women who perished as a result of the 

3 terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 

4 2001. Physical preparations for the conduct of the cere5 mony shall be carried out in accordance with such condi6 tions as may be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 25, 2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
First Amendment - Amended and Restated 2003 Stock Plan



 Exhibit 10.5 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 
 GLOBUS MEDICAL, INC. 

AMENDED AND RESTATED 2003 STOCK PLAN 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors and the stockholders of Globus Medical, Inc. (the “Company”) deems it to be in the best interests of the Company to amend the Globus Medical, Inc.
Amended and Restated 2003 Stock Plan (the “2003 Stock Plan”) in order to increase the number of shares of Class A Common Stock of the Company issuable for awards under the 2003 Stock Plan to 9,000,000 shares and to
decrease the number of shares of Class B Common Stock of the Company issuable for awards under the 2003 Stock Plan to 13,500,000 shares; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the 2003 Stock Plan shall be amended as follows. 
 1. Paragraph 4
of the 2003 Stock Plan shall be deleted in its entirety and the following substituted in lieu thereof: 
 “4. Stock.
The stock subject to Stock Rights shall be either (a) authorized but unissued shares of Class A Common Stock of the Company, par value 0.001 per share, or such shares of the Company’s capital stock into which such class of shares
may be converted pursuant to any reorganization, recapitalization, merger, consolidation or the like (the “Class A Common Stock”), (b) authorized but unissued shares of Class B Common Stock of the Company, par value 0.001 per
share, or such shares of the Company’s capital stock into which such class of shares may be converted pursuant to any reorganization, recapitalization, merger, consolidation or the like (the “Class B Common Stock”), or (c) shares
of Class A Common Stock or Class B Common Stock reacquired by the Company in any manner. Subject to adjustment as provided herein, (i) the aggregate number of shares of Class A Common Stock that may be issued pursuant to the Plan is
nine million (9,000,000), and (ii) the aggregate number of shares of Class B Common Stock that may be issued pursuant to the Plan is thirteen million five hundred thousand (13,500,000), in each case subject to adjustment as provided herein. Any
such shares may be issued as ISOs, NSOs or Stock Bonuses, or to persons or entities making purchases pursuant to Purchase Rights, so long as the number of shares so issued does not exceed such aggregate number, as adjusted. If any Option granted
under the Plan shall expire or terminate for any reason without having been exercised in full or shall cease for any reason to be exercisable in whole or in part, or if the Company shall reacquire any shares issued pursuant to Stock Rights, the
unpurchased shares subject to such Options and any shares so reacquired by the Company shall again be available for grants of Stock Rights under the Plan. 
 3. Except as herein amended, the terms and provisions of the 2003 Stock Plan shall remain in full force and effect as originally adopted and approved, as amended to date.
Kahwahnas Nucumbhi POTTS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8187.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 4, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATIONS


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cabela's Incorporated  (the “registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 2, 2011 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), each of the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to his knowledge:





(1)      the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)      the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.





Dated:April 29, 2011/s/ Thomas L. MillnerThomas L. MillnerPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Ralph W. CastnerRalph W. CastnerExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 21
                                  ----------

           SUBSIDIARIES OF CHARLES E. SMITH RESIDENTIAL REALTY, INC.


Name                                    State of Incorporation/Formation
----                                    --------------------------------
Smith One, Inc.                                 Delaware
Smith Two, Inc.                                 Delaware
Smith Three, Inc.                               Delaware
Smith Four, Inc.                                Delaware
Smith Five, Inc.                                Delaware
Smith Six, Inc.                                 Delaware
Smith Seven, Inc.                               Delaware

Charles E. Smith Residential Realty L.P.        Delaware
Smith Employment Services L.P.                  Delaware

Smith Property Holdings One L.P.                Delaware
Smith Property Holdings One (D.C.) L.P.         Delaware
Smith Property Holdings Crystal Towers L.P.     Delaware
Smith Property Holdings Two L.P.                Delaware
Smith Property Holdings Two (D.C.) L.P.         Delaware
Smith Property Holdings Three L.P.              Delaware
Smith Property Holdings Three (D.C.) L.P.       Delaware
Smith Property Holdings Four L.P.               Delaware
Smith Property Holdings Kenmore L.P.            Delaware
Smith Property Holdings Five L.P.               Delaware
Smith Property Holdings Five (D.C.) L.P.        Delaware
First Herndon Associates Limited Partnership    Virginia
Smith Property Holdings Six L.P.                Delaware
Smith Property Holdings Six (D.C.) L.P.         Delaware
Smith Property Holdings Van Ness L.P.           Delaware
Smith Property Holdings Columbia Road L.P.      Delaware
Smith Property Holdings Seven L.P.              Delaware
Smith Property Holdings Crystal Plaza L.L.C.    Delaware
Metropolitan Acquisition Finance L.P.           Delaware

Smith Realty Company                            Maryland
Consolidated Engineering Services, Inc.         Maryland
Smith Management Construction, Inc.             Maryland
Charles E. Smith Insurance Agency, Inc.         District of Columbia


                                      E-1
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 Eastern District of Texas VIRTAMOVE, CORP. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP. 2:24-cv-00064-JRG VIRTAMOVE, CORP. 04/16/2024 /s/ Daniel B. Kolko Daniel B. Kolko, CA SBN 341680

Russ August & Kabat 

12424 Wilshire Blvd, 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, California 90025

dkolko@raklaw.com (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:24-cv-00064-JRG Document 17 Filed 04/16/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 134
Adam Christopher SHEAFE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7719.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
I N THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

A DOPTION OF RULES FOR

CONTINUING J UDICIAL

EDUCATION :

:

:

:

: NO. 827

SUPREME COURT RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 7 th day of February , 20 20

, upon the recommendation of the

C ontinuing Judicial Education Board of Judges, i t is Ordered pursuant to Article V,
Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania that Rules 101 through 605 of the Rules
for Continuing Judicial Education are adopted in the attached form.

To the extent that notice of proposed rulemaking would otherwise be required,
the immediate promulgation of the rules is found to be in t he interests of justice and

efficient administration.

This Order shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and the
rules herein shall be effective in 30 days.
Christopher SCRUGGS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8340.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 26, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.