alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Starbase Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas S. Norman, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
        Company.

/s/ Douglas S. Norman

Douglas S. Norman
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 111 (Thursday, June 9, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 35225]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12417]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; NIH Pathway to Independence Award 
(K99/R00) Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: July 21-22, 2022.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of General Medical Sciences, Natcher 
Building, 45 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Rebecca H. Johnson, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General 
Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 
45 Center Drive, Room 3AN18C, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-2771, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#08626760667b67667a604866616f657b26666160266f677e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8ee4e1e6e0fde1e0fce6cee0e7e9e3fda0e0e7e6a0e9e1f8">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives; 93.859, Biomedical Research and 
Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-12417 Filed 6-8-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/18/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      336,625
COMMITMENTS
 107,861  108,924   85,058  118,826  107,873  311,745  301,855   24,880   34,770

CHANGES FROM 03/11/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -18,415)
  -6,594  -12,385  -11,924   -4,385   -1,529  -22,903  -25,838    4,488    7,423

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    32.0     32.4     25.3     35.3     32.0     92.6     89.7      7.4     10.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      180)
      63       58       72       41       40      144      143
```

----

Updated March 21, 2014
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC., et al. v. Louis J. PETERSON, et al.

No. 18-1498 (R46-04 / OT 2019)

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 22, 2019

The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed on October 22, 2019, pursuant to Rule 46.1 of the Rules of this Court.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MICHAEL BEE HODGE, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23-CV-179

§

POLK COUNTY JAIL, et al., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING 

THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Michael Bee Hodge, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit. The court

previously referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States Magistrate

Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. 

The magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate

Judge recommending the case be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 41(b). To date, the parties have not filed objections.

The court has received the Report and Recommendation, along with the record, pleadings,

and all available evidence. After careful review, the court finds that the findings of fact and

conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (#12) is

ADOPTED. A final judgment shall be entered dismissing this lawsuit. 

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 14th day of February, 2024.

Case 9:23-cv-00179-MAC-CLS Document 14 Filed 02/14/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 8
Independent Auditors' Consent




To the Shareholders and Trustees of
Smith Barney Principal Return Fund - Security and Growth Fund:
We consent to the incorporation by reference, in this Prospectus and
Statement of Additional Information, of our report dated January 14,
2000, on the statement of assets and liabilities for the Smith Barney
Principal Return Fund - Security and Growth Fund (the Fund) as of
November 30, 1999 and the related statement of operations for the year
then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the
years in the two-year period then ended and the financial highlights
for each of the years in the four-year period then ended and for the
period from March 30, 1995 (commencement of operations) to November
30, 1995. These financial statements and financial highlights and our
report thereon are included in the Annual Report of the Fund as filed
on Form N-30D.
We also consent to the references to our firm under the headings
"Financial Highlights"in the Prospectus and "Independent Auditors" in
the Statement of Additional Information.



KPMG LLP
New York, New York
March 23, 2000
Page
Dale E. KLEBER, Petitioner v. CAREFUSION CORPORATION

No. 18-1346

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
----

|    |                                                                                                 |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cabela's Incorporated; |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
| Dated: | May 5, 2014 | /s/ Thomas L. Millner |
|   |   | Thomas L. MillnerPresident and Chief Executive Officer |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

GREY FOX PLAZA, THOMAS KROUSE,

DONNA KROUSE AND STEVEN KROUSE,

Petitioners

v.

HERBERT, ROWLAND AND GRUBIC, INC.,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 130 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 24th day of July, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1013 

To make 1 percent across-the-board rescissions in discretionary spending 

for each of fiscal years 2013 and 2014, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 6, 2013 

Mr. MESSER (for himself and Mr. MULVANEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Appropriations 

A BILL 

To make 1 percent across-the-board rescissions in discretionary spending for each of fiscal years 2013 and 2014, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Discretionary Spend5 ing Reduction Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ACROSS-THE-BOARD RESCISSIONS IN DISCRE7 TIONARY SPENDING FOR EACH OF FISCAL 

8 YEARS 2013 AND 2014. 

9 (a) ACROSS-THE-BOARD RESCISSIONS.—There is re10 scinded an amount equal to 1 percent of— 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1013 IH

1 (1) the budget authority provided (or obligation 

2 limitation imposed) in each of fiscal years 2013 and 

3 2014 for discretionary accounts in any fiscal year 

4 2013 or 2014 appropriation Act; 

5 (2) the budget authority provided in any ad6 vance appropriation for each of fiscal years 2013 

7 and 2014 for discretionary accounts in any prior fis8 cal year appropriation Act; and 

9 (3) the contract authority provided in each of 

10 fiscal years 2013 and 2014 for any program that is 

11 subject to a limitation contained in any fiscal year 

12 2013 or 2014 appropriation Act for discretionary ac13 counts. 

14 (b) APPLICATION.—The Director of the Office of 

15 Management and Budget may apply the rescissions re16 quired under subsection (a) to any discretionary account 

17 in the applicable appropriation Acts in order to achieve 

18 the required reductions. 

19 (c) SUBSEQUENT APPROPRIATION LAWS.—In the 

20 case of any fiscal year 2013 or 2014 appropriation Act 

21 enacted after the date of enactment of this section, any 

22 rescission required by subsection (a) shall take effect im23 mediately after the enactment of such Act. 

24 (d) OMB REPORT.—Within 30 days after the date 

25 of enactment of this section (or, if later, 30 days after 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1013 IH

1 the date of enactment of any fiscal year 2013 or 2014 

2 appropriation Act), the Director of the Office of Manage3 ment and Budget shall submit to the Committees on Ap4 propriations of the House of Representatives and the Sen5 ate a report specifying the account and amount of each 

6 rescission made pursuant to subsection (a). 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Matthew A. CASTRO, Petitioner v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 19-5917

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 21, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Verdell Marcel BROOKS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7504.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 4, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-18-00004-CR 

CECIL RAY MCDONALD AKA CECIL RAY TRIMBLE, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 

On Appeal from the 364th District Court 

Lubbock County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 2000-434,614, Honorable Bradley S. Underwood, Presiding 

 

January 18, 2018 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before CAMPBELL and PIRTLE and PARKER, JJ. 

Appellant, Cecil Ray McDonald, has filed a notice of appeal in this Court in which 

he again attempts to appeal his conviction for murder in trial court cause number 2000-

434,614. A direct appeal from this conviction was disposed of on its merits by this Court 

by our opinion of August 29, 2007, in which we affirmed his conviction. See McDonald v. 

State, No. 07-06-00276-CR, 2007 Tex. App. LEXIS 7139 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Aug. 29, 
2

2007, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication).1 Nonetheless, this is 

McDonald’s ninth attempt to perfect another appeal from this conviction. This Court has 

rejected his prior attempts, as has the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals and the United 

States Supreme Court.2 We again dismiss his purported appeal.

As we have repeatedly stated in our prior opinions, this Court lacks jurisdiction to 

consider a second appeal from McDonald’s 2001 conviction. See McDonald v. State, No. 

07-13-00438-CR, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 586, at *4 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Jan. 17, 2014, 

no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal 

for want of jurisdiction.

Judy C. Parker

 Justice

Do not publish.

 

1 Because McDonald’s first notice of appeal, sub nom, from his 2001 conviction was filed untimely, 

we dismissed his original appeal on that basis. See Trimble v. State, No. 07-02-00101-CR, 2002 Tex. App. 

LEXIS 1656 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Mar. 4, 2002, no pet.) (per curiam). The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals

later granted McDonald an out-of-time appeal. See Ex parte McDonald, No. AP-75,435, 2006 Tex. Crim. 

App. Unpub. LEXIS 723 (Tex. Crim. App. June 14, 2006) (per curiam) (not designated for publication).

2 We disposed of McDonald’s latest attempted appeal in McDonald v. State, No. 07-16-00430-CR, 

2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 12779 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Nov. 29, 2016, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for 

publication). The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals refused his petition for discretionary review. See In re 

McDonald, PD-1413-16, 2017 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 365 (Tex. Crim. App. Mar. 29, 2017). The United 

States Supreme Court has also denied his petition for writ of certiorari in a prior appeal. See McDonald v. 

Texas, 136 S. Ct. 72, 193 L. Ed. 2d 69, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 5227 (U.S. Oct. 5, 2015).
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

HEADWATER PARTNERS II LLC, 

Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant, 

vs. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

§

Case No. 2:24-cv-00015-JRG-RSP 

(Lead Case) 

Jury Trial Demanded 

T-MOBILE USA, INC. AND SPRINT LLC, 

Defendants and Counterclaimant-Plaintiffs. 

HEADWATER PARTNERS II LLC, 

Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant, 

vs. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

§

§ 

Case No. 2:24-cv-00016-JRG-RSP 

(Member Case) 

Jury Trial Demanded 

AT&T SERVICES, INC., AT&T MOBILITY 

LLC AND AT&T CORP., 

Defendants and Counterclaimant-Plaintiffs. 

HEADWATER PARTNERS II LLC, 

Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant, 

vs. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

§ 

§

§ 

Case No. 2:24-cv-00007-JRG-RSP 

Jury Trial Demanded 

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, D/B/A VERIZON 

WIRELESS, AND VERIZON CORPORATE 

SERVICES GROUP INC., 

Defendants and Counterclaimant-Plaintiffs. 

DECLARATION OF JACOB K. BARON IN SUPPORT OF ERICSSON INC.’S 

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO INTERVENE 

Case 2:24-cv-00015-JRG-RSP Document 55-1 Filed 07/17/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 509
2 

I, Jacob K. Baron, declare the following: 

1. I am a partner in the law firm of Holland & Knight LLP, outside counsel for the 

Intervenor, Ericsson Inc. (“Ericsson”). I make this declaration in support of Ericsson’s Unopposed 

Motion to Intervene (the “Motion”). The following facts are true to the best of my knowledge and, 

if called upon to do so, I could and would competently testify to the truth thereof. 

2. Before the Motion was filed, beginning on June 11, 2024, I met and conferred with 

Kris Davis and Jason Weitholter, outside counsel for Plaintiff Headwater Partners II LLC 

(“Headwater”). Outside counsel for Headwater informed me that Headwater does not oppose the 

Motion. 

3. Before the Motion was filed, I met and conferred with Jonathan Putman, in-house 

counsel for Defendants T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Sprint LLC (“T-Mobile”), Timothy Dyll, in-house 

counsel for Defendants AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T Mobility, LLC, and AT&T Corp. (“AT&T”), 

and Bukola Landis-Aina, in-house counsel for Defendants Cellco Partnership, d/b/a Verizon 

Wireless and Verizon Corporate Services Group Inc. (“Verizon”). In-house counsel for T-Mobile, 

AT&T and Verizon stated that they did not oppose the Motion. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Dated: July 17, 2024 /s/ Jacob K. Baron 

 Jacob K. Baron 

Case 2:24-cv-00015-JRG-RSP Document 55-1 Filed 07/17/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 510
(logo)CWCapital

ASSETMANAGEMENT

 

 **AnnualCompliance Statement**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

** **

**For the Period ofNovember 30, 2017 to December 31, 2017**

* *

**CSAIL 2017-CX10Commercial Mortgage Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass Through Certificates,Series 2017-CX10 (the “Trust”)**

 

           

I, David B. Iannarone, on behalf ofCWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer (the “CertifyingServicer”), certify to Credit Suisse Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp. andits officers, directors and affiliates, and with the knowledge and intent thatthey will rely upon this certification, that:

 

1.      I (or Servicing Officers under my supervision) have reviewed the CertifyingServicer’s activities between November 30, 2017 and December 31, 2017 (the “ReportingPeriod”) and the Certifying Servicer’s performance under the Pooling andServicing Agreement; and

 

2.      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certifying Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement inall material respects during the Reporting Period.

 

 

Date:  March 1, 2018

 

CWCapitalAsset Management LLC, as Special Servicer

 

 

By: /s/ David B. Iannarone

Name: David B. Iannarone

Title:   President

 

 

7501Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 500 West, Bethesda, MD 20814

www.cwcapital.com
EX-32.1
      CERTIFICATION OF CEO


**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**SARBANES-OXLEY
      SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**




In
      connection with the quarterly report of Modern City Entertainment Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form l0-QSB/A for the three month ended June 30, 2006,
      William Erfurth, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director hereby
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the SARBANES - OXLEY Act of 2002, that to the best of his
      knowledge:




1.
      The quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date: July 27,
                2007
            
            
            
            By:
            
            William
                Erfurth, President, CEO &
Director
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas September 16, 2022 No. 04-22-00524-CV ROCKSPRINGS VAL VERDE WIND, LLC ("Rocksprings"), Appellant

v. Jackie CASANOVA , RPA, CCA, in her capacity as the Chief Appraiser of the Val Verde County Appraisal District, Appellee From the 63rd Judicial District Court, Val Verde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 34133 Honorable Roland Andrade, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R On September 15, 2022, the trial court reporter Lisa A. Traslavina filed a notification of late record, notifying this court that the reporter’s record was not filed when it was originally due because appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the reporter’s fee for preparing the record. It is therefore ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this court within ten (10) days of the date of this order that either (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the reporter’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee. The reporter’s record must be filed no later than thirty (30) days after the date appellant’s written proof is filed with this court. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, appellant’s brief will be due within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, and the court will consider only those issues or points raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(c).

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 16th day of September, 2022.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court