34242 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 108 / Monday, June 6, 2022 / Notices 

8The cash deposit rate for Celik Halat and the 

companies covered by the all-others rate is adjusted 

for the export subsidies found for Celik Halat in the 

final remand redetermination of the companion 

countervailing duty investigation (i.e., 0.49 

percent). See Final Results of Redetermination 

Pursuant to Court Remand, Court No. 21–00050, 

dated April 15, 2022, at 26–27 and 30–32, aff’d 

Celik Halat ve Tel Sanayi A.S. v. United States, Slip 

Op. 22–55, Consol. Court No. 21–00050 (CIT May 

26, 2022). 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 

35481 (July 6, 2021) (Initiation Notice). In the 

Initiation Notice, we inadvertently omitted the 

name of a company for which a review was 

requested, Kale Baglanti Teknolojileri San. ve Tic. 

A.S., and included the name of Borusan 

Mannesmann Pipe U.S. Inc. (BMP), Borusan 

Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.’ affiliated 

U.S. reseller, which, itself, is not an exporter or 

producer of the subject merchandise. On May 19, 

2022, Commerce published in the Federal Register 

a correction to the Initiation Notice, in which we 

identified these errors and announced a correction, 

by including the name of Kale Baglanti 

Teknolojileri San. ve Tic. A.S. and removing BMP 

from the list of companies covered by the initiation 

of an administrative review. See Circular Welded 

Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products 

from Turkey: Correction to the Initiation Notice of 

the 2020–2021 Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 87 FR 30453 (May 19, 2022). 

2 Id. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Administrative Review of 

the Antidumping Duty Order on Welded Carbon 

Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products from 

Turkey: Respondent Selection,’’ dated August 11, 

2021. We note that in the Initiation Notice, there is 

a spelling error for Istikbal’s name. Specifically, 

Istikbal’s name should read ‘‘Borusan Istikbal 

Ticaret T.A.S.,’’ instead of ‘‘Borusman Istikbal 

Ticaret T.A.S.,’’ which is the name listed in the 

Initiation Notice based on review requests from 

Nucor Tubular Products Inc. (Nucor) and 

Wheatland Tube Company (Wheatland). 

Accordingly, we are correcting this spelling error 

for purposes of these preliminary results. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘2020–2021 Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review of Circular Welded 

Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products from 

Turkey: Extension of Deadline for Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review,’’ dated January 11, 2022. 

5Antidumping Duty Order; Welded Carbon Steel 

Standard Pipe and Tube Products from Turkey, 51 

FR 17784 (May 15, 1986) (Order). 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review: Circular Welded Carbon 

Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products from 

Turkey; 2020–2021’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum). 

7 Id. 

8See Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S.’s 

(Toscelik Profil) Letter, ‘‘Circular Welded Carbon 

Steel Pipe from Turkey; Toscelik No Shipments 

Letter,’’ dated June 18, 2021; Yucel Boru ve Profil 

Endustrisi A.S ̧.’s Letter, ‘‘Circular Welded Carbon 

Steel Pipe from Turkey; Yucel No Shipments 

Letter,’’ dated June 18, 2021; Cinar Boru Profil 

Sanayi ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi’s Letter, ‘‘Circular 

Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Turkey 

(A–489–501),’’ dated June 16, 2021; Erbosan Erciyas 

Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.’s Letter, ‘‘No Shipment 

Certificate of Erbosan Erciyas Boru Sanayi ve 

Ticaret A.S. (‘‘ERBOSAN’’), dated July 1, 2021; and 

Borusan Mannesmann’s Letter, ‘‘Circular Welded 

Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Turkey, Case 

No. A–489–501: No Shipments Letter,’’ dated 

August 5, 2021. One of these 15 companies, 

Toscelik Spiral Boru Uretim A.S. (Toscelik Uretim), 

which is not subject to this review, voluntarily 

submitted a no shipment certification via Toscelik 

Profil’s No Shipment Certification Letter. However, 

because this company is not subject to this review 

(i.e., no party requested a review of Toscelik 

Uretim), we have not evaluated its no shipment 

claim. 

9See, e.g., Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe 

and Tube Products from Turkey: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

Commerce will issue revised cash 

deposit instructions to U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 516A(c) and 

(e) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: May 31, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2022–12094 Filed 6–3–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–489–501] 

Circular Welded Carbon Steel Standard 

Pipe and Tube Products From Turkey: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review and 

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments; 2020–2021 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty (AD) order on 

circular welded carbon steel standard 

pipe and tube products (CWP) from 

Turkey. The period of review (POR) is 

May 1, 2020, through April 30, 2021. 

Commerce preliminarily determines 

that the producers/exporters subject to 

this review made sales of subject 

merchandise at less than normal value. 

We invite interested parties to comment 

on these preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable June 6, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Magd Zalok, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

IV, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4162. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 6, 2021, based on timely 

requests for a review, in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we 

initiated this administrative review,1

covering 20 companies.2 The sole 

mandatory respondent in this 

administrative review is Borusan 

Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret 

A.S. (Borusan Mannesmann) and 

Borusan Istikbal Ticaret T.A.S. (Istikbal) 

(collectively, Borusan).3 On January 11, 

2022, we extended the deadline for the 

preliminary results by 120 days to May 

31, 2022.4

Scope of the Order 5

The merchandise covered by the 

Order is circular welded carbon steel 

standard pipe and tube products. For a 

complete description of the scope of the 

Order, see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum.6

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 

Export price and constructed export 

price are calculated in accordance with 

section 772 of the Act. Normal value is 

calculated in accordance with section 

773 of the Act. 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum.7 A list of the 

topics discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is attached as 

Appendix I to this notice. The 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

Between June 16 and August 5, 2021, 

15 companies timely submitted letters 

to Commerce certifying that they had no 

sales, shipments, or entries of the 

subject merchandise to the United 

States during the POR.8

With respect to Istikbal, one of the 

companies which certified no 

shipments during the POR, we continue 

to find it to be part of the single entity, 

Borusan, and we find no record 

evidence that warrants altering this 

treatment.9 Therefore, because we find 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 108 / Monday, June 6, 2022 / Notices 34243 

Final Determination of No Shipments; 2013–2014, 

80 FR 76674, 76674 (December 10, 2015). 10As stated above, Toscelik Uretim is not under 

review and, therefore, we have not evaluated its no 

shipment claim. 11See Preliminary Decision Memorandum; see 

also Memorandum, ‘‘Welded Carbon Steel Standard 

Pipe and Tube Products from Turkey: Release of 

Customs and Border Protection Data,’’ dated July 

16, 2021. 

12See, e.g., Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded 

Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from the Republic of 

Turkey: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Preliminary 

Determination of No Shipment; 2017–2018, 84 FR 

34863 (July 19, 2019), and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 4; see also 

Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694– 

95 (October 24, 2011); the ‘‘Assessment Rates’’ 

section, below; and Certain Frozen Warmwater 

Shrimp from Thailand; Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial 

Rescission of Review, Preliminary Determination of 

No Shipments; 2012–2013, 79 FR 15951, 15952 

(March 24, 2014), unchanged in Certain Frozen 

Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final 

Determination of No Shipments, and Partial 

Rescission of Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 51306, 

51307 (August 28, 2014). 

13See Memorandum, ‘‘Administrative Review of 

the Antidumping Duty Order on Welded Carbon 

Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products from 

Turkey: Respondent Selection,’’ dated August 11, 

2021. 

14 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

15See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 

16See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR23954 (May 6, 2003). 

17See Order, 51 FR 17784. 

that Borusan had shipments during this 

POR, we have not made a preliminary 

determination of no shipments with 

respect to Istikbal. 

With respect to the remaining 13 

companies that certified no shipments 

and are under review,10 U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) did not 

have any information to contradict these 

claims of no shipments during the 

POR.11 Therefore, we preliminarily 

determine that the companies listed in 

Appendix II did not have shipments of 

subject merchandise during the POR. 

Consistent with our practice,12

Commerce finds that it is not 

appropriate to rescind the review with 

respect to these 13 companies but, 

rather, to complete the review and issue 

appropriate instructions to CBP based 

on the final results of this review. 

Rates for Companies Not Individually 

Examined 

The statute and Commerce’s 

regulations do not address the 

establishment of a rate to be applied to 

companies not selected for individual 

examination when Commerce limits its 

examination in an administrative review 

pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the 

Act. Generally, Commerce looks to 

section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which 

provides instructions for calculating the 

all-others rate in a market economy 

investigation, for guidance when 

calculating the rate for companies 

which were not selected for individual 

examination in an administrative 

review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of 

the Act, the all-others rate is normally 

‘‘an amount equal to the weighted 

average of the estimated weightedaverage dumping margins established 

for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding any 

zero or de minimis margins, and any 

margins determined entirely on the 

basis of facts available.’’ 

Five companies, Borusan Holding; 

Borusan Mannesmann Yatirim Holding; 

Noksel Celik Boru Sanayi A.S.; Kale 

Baglann Teknolojileri San. ve Tic. A.S.; 

and Kale Baglanti Teknolojileri San. ve 

Tic. A.S., remain subject to this 

administrative review because none of 

these five companies were selected as a 

mandatory respondent; 13 the subject of 

a withdrawal of request for review, 

requested to participate as a voluntary 

respondent, or submitted a claim of no 

shipments. As such, these five 

companies remain as unexamined 

respondents. In accordance with section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, Commerce is 

assigning the weighted-average 

dumping margin of the mandatory 

respondent Borusan, 13.79 percent, to 

the five non-selected companies in these 

preliminary results. 

Preliminary Results of Review 

We preliminarily determine that the 

following weighted-average dumping 

margins exist for the period May 1, 

2020, through April 30, 2021: 

Exporter/producer 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve 

Ticaret A.S./Borusan Istikbal Ticaret 

T.A.S .................................................. 13.79 

Borusan Holding .................................... 13.79 

Borusan Mannesmann Yatirim Holding 13.79 

Kale Baglanti Teknolojileri San. ve Tic. 

A.S ..................................................... 13.79 

Kale Baglann Teknolojileri San. Ve Tic. 

A.S ..................................................... 13.79 

Noksel Celik Boru Sanayi A.S .............. 13.79 

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuance of the final results, 

Commerce will determine, and CBP 

shall assess, Ads on all appropriate 

entries covered by this review.14 The 

final results of this review shall be the 

basis for the assessment of ADs on 

entries of merchandise covered by this 

review and for future deposits of 

estimated duties, where applicable.15

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

where an examined respondent’s 

weighted-average dumping margin is 

not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 

percent) in the final results of this 

review, we will calculate an importerspecific ad valorem duty assessment 

rate based on the ratio of the total 

amount of dumping calculated for the 

U.S. sales for a given importer to the 

total entered value of those sales. Where 

a mandatory respondent did not report 

entered value, we calculate the entered 

value in order to calculate the 

assessment rate. Where either the 

respondent’s weighted-average dumping 

margin is zero or de minimis within the 

meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an 

importer-specific assessment rate is zero 

or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to ADs. 

For the companies that were not 

selected for individual examination, we 

will instruct CBP to assess antidumping 

duties at an ad valorem rate equal to 

each company’s weighted-average 

dumping margin determined in the final 

results of this review. 

For entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by Borusan 

for which it did not know that its 

merchandise was destined for the 

United States and for all entries 

attributed to companies that we find 

had no shipments during the POR, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate such 

unreviewed entries pursuant to the 

reseller policy,16 i.e., the assessment 

rate for such entries will be equal to the 

all-others rate established in the 

investigation (i.e., 14.74 percent ad 

valorem),17 if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective for all shipments of the 

subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the 

cash deposit rate for each specific 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
34244 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 108 / Monday, June 6, 2022 / Notices 

18 Id. 

19See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii); see also 19 CFR 

351.303 (for general filing requirements). 

20See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1). 

21See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

22 Id. 

23See 19 CFR 351.303. 

24See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD 

Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension 

of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 

25See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

26See 19 CFR 351.303. 

27See 19 CFR 351.303(f). 

28We note that Nucor, a petitioner in this 

proceeding, requested an administrative review for 

‘‘Yucelboru Ihracat Ithalat ve Pazarlama A.S.,’’ 

whereas, the second petitioner, Wheatland, 

requested an administrative review for ‘‘Yucelboru 

Ihracat ve Pazarlama A.S.’’ (Yucelboru). 

Additionally, the Initiation Notice listed 

Yucelboru’s name as listed in Wheatland’s Request 

for an administrative review (i.e., ‘‘Yucelboru 

Ihracat vs Pazarlama A.S.’’). Accordingly, we 

reference Yucelboru’s name as listed in the 

Initiation Notice for purposes of these preliminary 

results. 

company listed above will be equal to 

each company’s weighted-average 

dumping margin established in the final 

results of this review, (except if the ad 

valorem rate is de minimis within the 

meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(C)(1), in 

which case the cash deposit rate will be 

zero); (2) for previously investigated 

companies not participating in this 

review, the cash deposit will continue 

to be the company-specific rate 

published for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding in 

which the company participated; (3) if 

the exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, or the underlying investigation, 

but the producer is, then the cash 

deposit rate will be the rate established 

for the most recently completed segment 

for the producer of the merchandise; 

and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 

producers or exporters will continue to 

be 14.74 percent, the all-others rate 

established in the underlying 

investigation.18

These cash deposit requirements, 

when imposed, shall remain in effect 

until further notice. 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

Commerce intends to disclose the 

calculations performed in connection 

with these preliminary results to 

interested parties within five days after 

the date of publication of this notice in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Interested parties may submit case 

briefs no later than 30 days after the 

date of publication of this notice.19

Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised 

in the case briefs, may be filed not later 

than seven days after the time limit for 

filing case briefs.20 Parties who submit 

case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this 

proceeding are encouraged to submit 

with each argument: (1) a statement of 

the issue; (2) a brief summary of the 

argument; and (3) a table of 

authorities.21 Executive summaries 

should be limited to five pages total, 

including footnotes.22 Case and rebuttal 

briefs should be filed using ACCESS 

and must be served on interested 

parties.23 Note that Commerce has 

temporarily modified certain of its 

requirements for serving documents 

containing business proprietary 

information, until further notice.24

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), any 

interested party who wishes to request 

a hearing must submit a written request 

to the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance within 30 

days of publication of this notice. 

Hearing requests should contain: (1) the 

party’s name, address, and telephone 

number; (2) the number of participants; 

and (3) a list of the issues to be 

discussed. Issues raised in the hearing 

will be limited to issues raised in the 

case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for 

a hearing is made, Commerce intends to 

hold the hearing at a time and date to 

be determined.25 Parties should confirm 

by telephone the date, time, and 

location of the hearing two days before 

the scheduled date. 

All submissions to Commerce must be 

filed electronically using ACCESS 26

and must also be served on interested 

parties.27 An electronically filed 

document must be received successfully 

in its entirety by ACCESS, by 5 p.m. 

Eastern Time (ET) on the date that the 

document is due. 

Unless otherwise extended, 

Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of this administrative review, 

which will include the results of its 

analysis of issues raised in any briefs, 

within 120 days of publication of these 

preliminary results, pursuant to section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 

the reimbursement of ADs prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of ADs occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double ADs. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: May 27, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

V. Companies Not Selected For Individual 

Examination 

VI. Discussion Of The Methodology 

VII. Currency Conversion 

VIII. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

List of Companies With No Shipments 

During the Period of Review 

1. Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S.; 

2. Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S.; 

3. Toscelik Metal Ticaret A.S.; 

4. Cayirova Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.; 

5. Yucel Boru ve Profil Endustrisi A.S.; 

6. Yucelboru Ihracat ve Pazarlama A.S.; 28

7. Cinar Boru Profil San. Ve Tic. AS; 

8. Erbosan Erciyas Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret 

A.S.; 

9. Borusan Birlesik Boru Fabrikalari San ve 

Tic; 

10. Borusan Gemlik Boru Tesisleri A.S.; 

11. Borusan Ihracat Ithalat ve Dagitim A.S.; 

12. Tubeco Pipe and Steel Corporation; and 

13. Borusan Ithicat ve Dagitim A.S. 

[FR Doc. 2022–12087 Filed 6–3–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–423–812] 

Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-ToLength Plate From Belgium: 

Preliminary Results and Partial 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2020–2021 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily determines 

that Industeel Belgium S.A. (Industeel), 

a producer and exporter subject to this 

administrative review, made sales of 

subject merchandise at less than normal 

value (NV) during the period of review 

(POR) May 1, 2020, through April 30, 

2021. Additionally, based on timely 

withdrawal of requests for review, we 

are rescinding this administrative 

review with respect to all other 

companies for which we initiatated an 

administrative review. Interested parties 

are invited to comment on these 

preliminary results. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1