alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MR. R. DAVID GUERRERO

JIM WELLS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK

P.O. BOX 2219

ALICE, TX 78333-2219 RE: Case No. 15-0992 DATE: 12/23/2015

COA #: 04-14-00811-CV TC#: 11-04-49987-CV

STYLE: RANDY COLEMAN AND JIM COLEMAN COMPANY

v. RALPH DEAN

Today the Supreme Court of Texas received and

filed Randy Coleman’s motion for extension of time to

file petition for review pursuant to Rule 53.7(f) in

the above numbered and styled case.MR. JOSEPH MICHAEL GUERRA

ATTORNEY AT LAW

P.O. BOX 1968

ALICE, TX 78333 RE: Case No. 15-0992 DATE: 12/23/2015

COA #: 04-14-00811-CV TC#: 11-04-49987-CV

STYLE: RANDY COLEMAN AND JIM COLEMAN COMPANY

v. RALPH DEAN

Today the Supreme Court of Texas received and

filed Randy Coleman’s motion for extension of time to

file petition for review pursuant to Rule 53.7(f) in

the above numbered and styled case.MR. FRANK WEATHERED

DUNN, WEATHERED, COFFEY

RIVERA & KASPERITIS, PC

611 SOUTH UPPER BROADWAY

CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78401 RE: Case No. 15-0992 DATE: 12/23/2015

COA #: 04-14-00811-CV TC#: 11-04-49987-CV

STYLE: RANDY COLEMAN AND JIM COLEMAN COMPANY

v. RALPH DEAN

Today the Supreme Court of Texas received and

filed Randy Coleman’s motion for extension of time to

file petition for review pursuant to Rule 53.7(f) in

the above numbered and styled case.MR. PAUL R. LAWRENCE

LAW OFFICE OF PAUL R. LAWRENCE

2180 NORTH LOOP WEST, SUITE 510

HOUSTON, TX 77007 RE: Case No. 15-0992 DATE: 12/23/2015

COA #: 04-14-00811-CV TC#: 11-04-49987-CV

STYLE: RANDY COLEMAN AND JIM COLEMAN COMPANY

v. RALPH DEAN

Today the Supreme Court of Texas received and

filed Randy Coleman’s motion for extension of time to

file petition for review pursuant to Rule 53.7(f) in

the above numbered and styled case.MR. KEITH E. HOTTLE

CLERK, FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

BEXAR COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER

300 DOLOROSA, STE. 3200

SAN ANTONIO, TX 78205 RE: Case No. 15-0992 DATE: 12/23/2015

COA #: 04-14-00811-CV TC#: 11-04-49987-CV

STYLE: RANDY COLEMAN AND JIM COLEMAN COMPANY

v. RALPH DEAN

Today the Supreme Court of Texas received and

filed Randy Coleman’s motion for extension of time to

file petition for review pursuant to Rule 53.7(f) in

the above numbered and styled case.MR. CHARLES C. WEBB JR.

WEBB CASON, P.C.

710 MESQUITE

CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78401 RE: Case No. 15-0992 DATE: 12/23/2015

COA #: 04-14-00811-CV TC#: 11-04-49987-CV

STYLE: RANDY COLEMAN AND JIM COLEMAN COMPANY

v. RALPH DEAN

Today the Supreme Court of Texas received and

filed Randy Coleman’s motion for extension of time to

file petition for review pursuant to Rule 53.7(f) in

the above numbered and styled case.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1996
<CASH>                                           2,932
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,125
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,783
<INVENTORY>                                    157,564
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               236,445
<PP&E>                                         376,904
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,538
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,080,580
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          278,054
<BONDS>                                        703,962
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           646
<OTHER-SE>                                   (422,214)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,080,580
<SALES>                                      1,509,877
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,509,877
<CGS>                                        1,067,659
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  399,907
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,746
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             101,150
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (66,585)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,988
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (68,573)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (68,573)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.08)
        

</TABLE>
```
 
 
WHEAT-HRSpring - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                          Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/19/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       64,265
COMMITMENTS
  17,229    8,633    3,147   30,682   38,058   51,058   49,838   13,207   14,427

CHANGES FROM 08/12/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        182)
    -485      614       97     -169   -1,591     -557     -880      739    1,062

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    26.8     13.4      4.9     47.7     59.2     79.4     77.6     20.6     22.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       85)
      18       15       13       46       31       72       54
```

----

Updated August 22, 2014
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 4.14



                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

                                       OF

                            GOLDMAN SACHS CAPITAL III

      This Certificate of Trust of Goldman Sachs Capital III (the "Trust"),
dated as of January 20, 2004, is being duly executed and filed by the
undersigned, as trustees, to form a statutory trust under the Delaware Statutory
Trust Act (12 Del. C. Section 3801, et seq.)(the "Act").

      1. Name. The name of the statutory trust being formed hereby is Goldman
Sachs Capital III.

      2. Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of the
Trust, with a principal place of business in the State of Delaware, are The Bank
of New York (Delaware), White Clay Center, Route 273, Newark, Delaware 19711.

      3. Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective as of its
filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate of
Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a)(1) of the Act as of the date first
above written.

                                   THE BANK OF NEW YORK (DELAWARE), not in its
                                   individual capacity, but solely as trustee


                                   By: /s/ William T. Lewis
                                      _______________________________________
                                      Name:  William T. Lewis
                                      Title: Sr. Vice President
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1055 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1055

         To suspend temporarily the duty on Disperse Violet 57.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2013

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on Disperse Violet 57.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISPERSE VIOLET 57.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Disperse Violet 57  Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          (CAS No. 1594-08-                                                 12/31/2016
                          7) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          3204.11.10)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 113 (Monday, June 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 35850]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12632]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee 
will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public 
comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the 
Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, July 28, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gilbert Martinez at 1-888-912-1227 or 
(737) 800-4060.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee 
will be held Thursday, July 28, 2022, at 1:30 p.m. Eastern Time via 
teleconference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. For more information, please 
contact Gilbert Martinez at 1-888-912-1227 or (737-800-4060), or write 
TAP Office 3651 S. IH-35, STOP 1005 AUSC, Austin, TX 78741, or post 
comments to the website: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various committee issues for submission to 
the IRS and other TAP related topics. Public input is welcomed.

    Dated: June 7, 2022.
Kevin Brown,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2022-12632 Filed 6-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

SCOTTY BRIDGES §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24-CV-42

UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS §

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiff Scotty Bridges, a prisoner confined at the Gib Lewis Unit of the Texas Department

of CriminalJustice,Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against unknown employees of the Gib Lewis Unit.

Discussion

When, as in this case, jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1391 provides that venue is proper only in the judicial district where the defendants reside or in

which the claim arose. However, under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), for the convenience of parties and

witnesses and in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other

district or division where it could have been brought. Such a transfer may be done sua sponte and

is reviewable only for an abuse of discretion. Mills v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 886 F.2d 758, 761 (5th

Cir. 1989).

Plaintiff complains about incidents that took place at the Gib Lewis Unit, which is located

in the Lufkin Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. 

However, this case was filed in the Beaumont Division. The court has considered the circumstances

and determined that the interests of justice would be served if the complaint were transferred to the

division in which the claims arose. It is accordingly

Case 1:24-cv-00042-MAC-ZJH Document 3 Filed 04/01/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 19
ORDERED that this civil rights action is TRANSFERRED to the Lufkin Division of the

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.

2

_________________________

Zack Hawthorn

United States Magistrate Judge SIGNED this 1st day of April, 2024.

Case 1:24-cv-00042-MAC-ZJH Document 3 Filed 04/01/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 20
IA 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 116 

Providing for the approval of the Congress of the proposed Agreement for 

Cooperation Between the Government of the United States of America 

and the Government of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam Concerning 

Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy transmitted on May 8, 2014. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 9, 2014 

Mr. KINZINGER of Illinois (for himself and Mr. ENGEL) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign 

Affairs 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the approval of the Congress of the proposed 

Agreement for Cooperation Between the Government of 

the United States of America and the Government of 

the Socialist Republic of Vietnam Concerning Peaceful 

Uses of Nuclear Energy transmitted on May 8, 2014. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the Congress does favor the proposed agreement for 

4 cooperation transmitted to the Congress by the President 

5 on May 8, 2014. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.1**
 **CERTIFICATION
      OF PERIODIC REPORT**
 I,
      Dennis G. McLaughlin, III, Chief Executive Officer of Earth Biofuels, Inc.
      (the
“Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my
      knowledge:
 (1) the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the three months
      ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
      U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
 (2) the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:
      November 20, 2007
 /s/
                Dennis G. McLaughlin, IIIDennis
                G. McLaughlin, IIIChief
                Executive Officer
 A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-30362

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Paul Anthony Lewis, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:22-CR-184-1

______________________________

Before Davis, Ho, and Ramirez, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

A jury convicted Paul Anthony Lewis of conspiracy to possess with 

intent to distribute various controlled substances and several counts of 

possession with intent to distribute controlled substances. The district court 

sentenced him to 240 months of imprisonment, to be followed by supervised 

release.

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 5, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-30362 Document: 00517055820 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/05/2024
No. 23-30362

2

On appeal, Lewis argues that the Government called a witness to 

testify at trial for the sole purpose of impeaching her in order to introduce a

recording of her interview with authorities, which would otherwise be 

inadmissible as hearsay. The evidence contained in the recording, according 

to Lewis, was the only thing linking him to a backpack containing narcotics. 

A district court’s evidentiary rulings are reviewed under the abuse of 

discretion standard. United States v. Cisneros-Gutierrez, 517 F.3d 751, 757 

(5th Cir. 2008). Any party may attack the credibility of a witness, “including 

the party calling the witness.” Fed. R. Evid. 607. However, the 

Government “may not call a witness it knows to be hostile for the primary

purpose of eliciting otherwise inadmissible impeachment testimony.” 

Cisneros-Gutierrez, 517 F.3d at 760 (internal quotation marks and footnote 

citation omitted).

Lewis fails to show that this was the Government’s primary purpose. 

See id. Lewis’s reliance on United States v. Hogan, 763 F.2d 697 (5th Cir. 

1985), opinion withdrawn in part on other grounds, 771 F.2d 82 (5th Cir. 1985), 

is unavailing. Here, the Government indicated that the witness’s testimony 

at trial might be different from her prior statement, the witness’s prior 

statements were not under oath, and the witness’s testimony was helpful to 

the Government in that she admitted that she told authorities that Lewis 

carried the backpack. Accordingly, Lewis has failed to show that the district 

court abused its discretion in allowing the Government to present witness’s 

testimony. See Cisneros-Gutierrez, 517 F.3d at 757, 760.

AFFIRMED.

Case: 23-30362 Document: 00517055820 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/05/2024
William Jovian DAVIS, Petitioner, v. Clark E. DUCART, Warden.

No. 19-6429.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 4, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT D 

Case 5:23-cv-00134-RWS-JBB Document 13-5 Filed 01/26/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 230
Case 5:23-cv-00134-RWS-JBB Document 13-5 Filed 01/26/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 231
United States District Court

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

PETER GRIGG,

Plaintiff,

v. 

JEREMY MCKEY, 

Defendant. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 4:23-cv-00624

Judge Mazzant/Judge Davis

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, 

this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. 

On August 16, 2024, the Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. #15) that 

Plaintiff Peter Grigg’s Motion for Default Judgment (Dkt. #4) be denied, Defendant Jeremy 

McKey’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #5) be denied as moot, and Defendant McKey’s Motion to 

Compel Arbitration (Dkt. #13) be granted.

Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no timely objections 

being filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge 

are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff Grigg’s Motion for Default Judgment (Dkt. #4) is

hereby DENIED, Defendant McKey’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #5) is hereby DENIED as moot,

and Defendant McKey’s Motion to Compel Arbitration (Dkt. #13) is hereby GRANTED. 

It is FURTHER ORDERED that this case is stayed pending the resolution of arbitration. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case 4:23-cv-00624-ALM-BD Document 17 Filed 09/23/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 129
2

Case 4:23-cv-00624-ALM-BD Document 17 Filed 09/23/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 130
- 1 -

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

CONSOLIDATED TRANSACTION 

PROCESSING LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

WALGREENS CO., d/b/a WALGREENS,

Defendant.

C.A. No. 4:23-cv-1078-ALM

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS

On this day, Plaintiff Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC (“Plaintiff”) and

Defendant Walgreens Co., d/b/a Walgreens (“Defendant”) (collectively, the “Parties”)

announced to the Court that they have resolved Plaintiff’s claims for relief against Defendant and 

Defendant’s counterclaims against Plaintiff asserted in this case. The Parties have therefore 

requested that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s claims for relief against Defendant and Defendant’s 

counterclaims for relief against Plaintiff with prejudice, and with all attorneys’ fees, costs and 

expenses taxed against the party incurring same. Defendant may re-assert its claims and 

counterclaims in the event any Person or Entity asserts a claim related to the Asserted Patents or 

this Settlement Agreement against Defendant, unless said assertion is cured by Plaintiff within 

30 days of notice from Defendant. The Court, having considered this request, is of the opinion 

that their request for dismissal should be granted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims for relief against Defendant and 

Defendant’s counterclaims against Plaintiff are dismissed with prejudice.

Case 4:23-cv-01078-ALM Document 47-1 Filed 11/15/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 565
- 2 -

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all attorneys’ fees, costs of court and expenses shall be 

borne by each party incurring the same.

Case 4:23-cv-01078-ALM Document 47-1 Filed 11/15/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 566
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Poolingand Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2017, by and among UBSCOMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIZATION CORP., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asSpecial Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as CertificateAdministrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, andPENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Operating Advisor and as Asset RepresentationsReviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series2017-C7 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. 

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of thisAgreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Servicesdo hereby certify that: 

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and 

 

2.       To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period. 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019. 

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton 

ManagingDirector 

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|