alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

The HONORABLE DAVID S. DOTY, United States District Judge for the

District of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-2357

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * District of Minnesota.

* 

Ramon Calles-Abrego, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: December 4, 2002

 Filed: December 12, 2002

___________

Before LOKEN, FAGG, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Ramon Calles-Abrego pleaded guilty to one count of possessing with intent to

distribute more than 50 grams of a substance containing cocaine base, in violation of

21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A). The district court1

 sentenced him to 120 months

imprisonment (the statutory minimum) and 5 years supervised release. The court

imposed, as a special condition of supervised release, the requirement that CallesAbrego comply with Immigration and Naturalization Service rules and not reenter the

United States illegally, and report to the nearest U.S. Probation Office within 72
-2-

hours of any reentry during his supervised release. On appeal, counsel has moved to

withdraw and has filed a brief in conformance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738 (1967), arguing that the 120-month sentence was unreasonable and the

supervised-release condition violated Calles-Abrego’s Fifth Amendment right against

self-incrimination. As neither of these arguments was raised below, our review is for

plain error. See United States v. Sun Bear, 307 F.3d 747, 750 (8th Cir. 2002).

We conclude that the district court did not plainly err in imposing the 120-

month sentence, because the unobjected-to drug quantity in the presentence report

required imposition of the 10-year statutory minimum. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A);

U.S.S.G. § 5G1.1(c)(2). Nor did the court plainly err in imposing the supervisedrelease condition. See United States v. Aguilar, 129 F.3d 122, 1997 WL 636619 (8th

Cir. Oct. 10, 1997) (unpublished per curiam) (finding no plain error in imposition of

same supervised-release condition). Moreover, having reviewed the record under

Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues.

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY
RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 CERTIFICATIONS I, W. Anderson Geater, Jr., certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Origen Financial,
Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Dated:
August 16, 2004/s/  W. Anderson Geater, Jr.W. Anderson Geater, Jr.,
Chief Financial Officer of Origen Financial, Inc.
WISCONSIN ALUMNI RESEARCH FOUNDATION, Petitioner v. APPLE INC.

No. 18-1508

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1092 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1092

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the air route traffic control center located in Nashua, 
New Hampshire, as the ``Patricia Clark Boston Air Route Traffic Control 
                               Center''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF PATRICIA CLARK BOSTON AIR ROUTE TRAFFIC 
              CONTROL CENTER.

    (a) In General.--The air route traffic control center located in 
Nashua, New Hampshire, and any successor air route traffic control 
center at that location, shall be known and designated as the 
``Patricia Clark Boston Air Route Traffic Control Center''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the air route traffic 
control center referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a 
reference to the ``Patricia Clark Boston Air Route Traffic Control 
Center''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 25, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1092

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the air route traffic control center located in Nashua, 
New Hampshire, as the ``Patricia Clark Boston Air Route Traffic Control 
                               Center''.
```
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000810271
<NAME> Smith Barney International Aggressive Growth Fund
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER>004
   <NAME>Smith Barney Investment Series

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 Oct-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                      Oct-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>             169,730,314
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>            217,410,898
<RECEIVABLES>                       1,933,257
<ASSETS-OTHER>                          8,788
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    219,352,943
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                    0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>             681,052
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                   681,052
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                             0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>          174,726,676
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>               3,066,457
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>               1,326,889
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                   0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                      0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>            (3,733,539)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                    0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>           47,678,754
<NET-ASSETS>                      218,671,891
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                     576,560
<INTEREST-INCOME>                     320,919
<OTHER-INCOME>                              0
<EXPENSES-NET>                      4,234,314
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>            (3,336,835)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>           (3,721,585)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>          11,708,804
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>               4,650,384
<EQUALIZATION>                              0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                   0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>            1,094,750
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                     118
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>             2,070,113
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>           354,053
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                    23,508
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>            135,915,973
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                     0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>           2,093,246
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                     0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                  0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>               1,924,573
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                     4,234,314
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>              105,037,744
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                  31.160
<PER-SHARE-NII>                        (0.940)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                10.380
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                    0.000
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>               0.740
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                    0.000
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                    39.860
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                          2.53



</TABLE>
Curtland H. CAFFEY, et al., Petitioners v. Brenda K. BOWERS, Chapter 7 Trustee

No. 18-1489

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000797480
<NAME> SMITH BARNEY SECTOR SERIES
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER>005
   <NAME>SMITH BARNEY GLOBAL BIOTECHNOLOGY FUND

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              2 Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 OCT-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                      OCT-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>             40,640,436
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>            35,999,917
<RECEIVABLES>                        475,175
<ASSETS-OTHER>                             0
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                     960
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    36,476,052
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>             398,478
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                    0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                  0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                  398,478
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                            0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>          40,667,354
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>              1,598,042
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                      0
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                  0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>               (75,412)
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                2,095
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                   0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>          (4,640,521)
<NET-ASSETS>                      35,953,516
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                          0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                     42,740
<OTHER-INCOME>                             0
<EXPENSES-NET>                       118,152
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>              (75,412)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>               2,095
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>         (4,640,521)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>             (4,713,838)
<EQUALIZATION>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                  0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                   0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                      0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>           41,165,480
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>         (498,126)
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                        0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>            35,953,516
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                    0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                  0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                    0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                 0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                 53,492
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                      206,348
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>              14,747,111
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                  11.40
<PER-SHARE-NII>                        (0.02)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                 0.00
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                    0.00
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>               0.00
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                    0.00
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                     9.86
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                         2.25
[AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING]                     0
[AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE]                       0



</TABLE>
Armando LOPEZ, Petitioner v. MASSACHUSETTS

No. 18-8739

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts denied.
John TEETS, Petitioner, v. GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 19-382

Supreme Court of the United States.

Nov. 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Mandrail Jamar WOODBERRY, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5501

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 12, 2019

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Rehaif* v. *United States* , 588 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 2191, 204 L.Ed.2d 594 (2019).
Lamar JOHNSON, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5181

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 21, 2019

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Rehaif* v. *United States* , 588 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 2191, 204 L.Ed.2d 594 (2019).
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018368EN.01001301.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 11.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 368/13 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9105 — Rhône Capital/Maxam)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 368/10)

1.

On 4 October 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018368EN.01001301-E0001) by which the undertaking Rhône Capital L.L.C. (‘Rhône Capital’, United States) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the undertaking MaxamCorp Holding, S.L. (‘Maxam’, Spain) by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   Rhône Capital: investment management firm,

—   Maxam: diversified group of companies which are active primarily in the manufacture and supply of civil explosives and initiating systems and related products, services and solutions; ammunition and defence products, services and systems; and recreational hunting and sporting products, such as cartridges and gunpowder, among others.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018368EN.01001301-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9105 — Rhône Capital/Maxam

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018368EN.01001301-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018368EN.01001301-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
Carey D. EBERT, Petitioner v. John Paul DEJORIA, et al.

No. 19-340

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Larry BELL, Petitioner, v. Kevin RANSOM, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Dallas, et al.

No. 19-7119.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for rehearing denied. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Order entered October 10, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01621-CR

No. 05-12-01622-CR

JOSHUA PULLIAM-ROBERTS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F12-34121-J, F12-34219-J

ORDER

In his brief, appellant raises issues related to the costs assessed against him. The records, 

however, do not contain cost bills or other documents with itemized lists of costs assessed in the 

cases.

Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within FIFTEEN 

DAYS of the date of this order, supplemental clerk’s records containing detailed itemizations of 

the costs assessed in the cases, including but not limited to, specific court costs, fees, and court 

appointed attorney fees. In accordance with Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 103.001, 

the cost bills shall be signed by the officer who charged the costs or the officer who is entitled to 

receive payment for the costs. We further ORDER that the supplemental clerk’s records include 
documents explaining any and all abbreviations used to designate a particular fee, cost, or court 

appointed attorney fee.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Gary 

Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal 

Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund V L.P. (the "Fund") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the Fund's general partner, Boston Capital Associates V L.L.C., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                  
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.



|                  |  |                            
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:             |  |                            
|February 16, 2010 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  | Marc N. Teal               
|                  |  | Principal Financial Officer
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  |                            



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/02/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      373,854
COMMITMENTS
 125,321  154,004  103,839  120,752   85,117  349,912  342,960   23,942   30,894

CHANGES FROM 11/25/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      4,110)
  -4,822    3,139     -308    6,790      -55    1,660    2,776    2,450    1,334

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    33.5     41.2     27.8     32.3     22.8     93.6     91.7      6.4      8.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      175)
      46       74       73       36       33      128      147
```

----

Updated December 6, 2014
IN RE Vinodh RAGHUBIR, Petitioner

No. 19-5627

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Charles ROCHESTER, Petitioner v. The FORTUNE SOCIETY.

No. 19-5725

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Lonnie W. HUBBARD, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7797.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
David D. PETERSON v. LINEAR CONTROLS, INC.

No. 18-1401. R46-020

Supreme Court of the United States.

July 10, 2020

The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46 of the Rules of this Court.