alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 02/25/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      107,070
COMMITMENTS
  24,080    9,920    5,806   70,372   88,303  100,258  104,029    6,812    3,041

CHANGES FROM 02/18/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      5,208)
     224    1,868    1,770    2,846    1,583    4,840    5,221      368      -13

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    22.5      9.3      5.4     65.7     82.5     93.6     97.2      6.4      2.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       93)
      13        8        3       53       37       67       47
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 02/25/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      254,156
COMMITMENTS
  85,167   36,613    3,523  153,934  203,201  242,624  243,337   11,532   10,819

CHANGES FROM 02/18/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,443)
      34     -481    1,714    1,024      781    2,772    2,014      671    1,429

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    33.5     14.4      1.4     60.6     80.0     95.5     95.7      4.5      4.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      189)
      56       29       11       75       60      136       95
```

----

Updated February 28, 2014
George HERNANDEZ, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9748

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-10105

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MICHAEL BARRETT, also known as “Motorcycle Mike”,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:16-CR-132-20

Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Michael Barrett pleaded guilty to conspiring to possess with intent to 

distribute 50 grams or more of a mixture and substance containing 

methamphetamine, and he was sentenced to 420 months of imprisonment and 

four years of supervised release. On appeal, he challenges the district court’s 

denial of his appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw and appoint substitute 

counsel for appeal and his motion for a continuance of the sentencing hearing. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 6, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-10105 Document: 00514418638 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/06/2018
No. 17-10105

2

Additionally, he contends that the 420-month sentence, which was within the 

applicable guidelines range of imprisonment, is substantively unreasonable.

Barrett has failed to demonstrate a “complete breakdown in 

communication” or “irreconcilable conflict” with counsel. United States v. 

Young, 482 F.2d 993, 995 (5th Cir. 1973). The district court did not abuse its 

discretion in denying the motion to withdraw and to appoint substitute counsel 

on appeal. See United States v. Simpson, 645 F.3d 300, 307 (5th Cir. 2011).

In addition, Barrett has failed to show that the district court abused its 

discretion in denying his motion to continue his sentencing hearing. See 

United States v. Stalnaker, 571 F.3d 428, 439 (5th Cir. 2009). He has not 

alleged, much less demonstrated, that he suffered “specific and compelling or 

serious prejudice” from the denial of the continuance. United States v. Barnett, 

197 F.3d 138, 144 (5th Cir. 1999) (internal quotation marks and citation 

omitted).

We review the substantive reasonableness of a sentence under an abuseof-discretion standard. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). Here, 

the district court considered Barrett’s arguments for a sentence below the 

guidelines range but determined that a 420-month sentence was appropriate

in light of Barrett’s criminal history and its belief that Barrett was a “danger 

to the community.” See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(1), (a)(2)(C). Barrett’s arguments 

are not sufficient to rebut the presumption of reasonableness that attaches to 

his within-guidelines sentence. See United States v. Rashad, 687 F.3d 637, 644 

(5th Cir. 2012); United States v. Ruiz, 621 F.3d 390, 398 (5th Cir. 2010).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Barrett’s motion to 

relieve counsel and to appoint new counsel is DENIED.

 Case: 17-10105 Document: 00514418638 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/06/2018
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**     I, Dennis G. McLaughlin,III, Chief Executive Officer of Earth Biofuels, Inc. (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that,to the best of my knowledge:     (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the six months ended June30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Date: August 20, 2007                                    /s/ Dennis G. McLaughlin, III   Dennis G. McLaughlin, III   Chief Executive Officer        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
# C_2017404EN.01000401.xml

| 29.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 404/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 404/4

---

Final Report of the Hearing Officer (1)

1

Case AT.39914 — Euro Interest Rate Derivatives (EIRD) (Settlement)

Amendment of fine imposed on Société Générale

(2017/C 404/04)

Case AT.39914 concerns conduct related to derivatives denominated in euro and linked to certain interest rates (the Euro Interbank Offered Rate and/or the Euro Over-Night Index Average). In the context of this case, the Commission adopted Decision C(2013) 8512 final of 4 December 2013 (the ‘Settlement Decision’) pursuant to Article 10a of Commission Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 (2), as amended (3). The Settlement Decision found that certain undertakings (4), among them Société Générale, participated in an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and of Article 53 of the EEA Agreement. It imposed a fine on Société Générale.

2

3

4

On 4 February 2016, Société Générale provided an amended response to a request by the Commission for information concerning Société Générale’s value of sales.

After verifying this amended response, the Commission, by letter dated 4 March 2016, gave Société Générale the opportunity of making known its views regarding the intention of the Commission services to propose a decision to the College of Commissioners that would, in order to reflect the corrected information provided by Société Générale, amend the fine originally imposed on it. Société Générale stated on 8 March 2016 that it had no comment on the proposed amendment of the Settlement Decision.

The draft decision does not modify the objections underlying the Settlement Decision. It deals only with fining matters, on which Société Générale has been given the opportunity to make known its views. I consider that the effective exercise of procedural rights has thus far been respected in the procedure relating to the draft decision.

Brussels, 4 April 2016.

Joos STRAGIER

---

(1)  Pursuant to Articles 16 and 17 of Decision 2011/695/EU of the President of the European Commission of 13 October 2011 on the function and terms of reference of the hearing officer in certain competition proceedings (OJ L 275, 20.10.2011, p. 29).

1

(2)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 of 7 April 2004 relating to the conduct of proceedings by the Commission pursuant to Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 18).

2

(3)  In particular by Commission Regulation (EC) No 622/2008 of 30 June 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 773/2004, as regards the conduct of settlement procedures in cartel cases (OJ L 171, 1.7.2008, p. 3).

3

(4)  Proceedings in Case AT.39914 are ongoing against certain other parties that did not opt for the settlement procedure set out in the abovementioned Article 10a.

4

---
Lakshmi ARUNACHALAM, Petitioner, v. INTUIT, INC.

No. 19-7910.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for *2794writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Natasha DELIMA, Petitioner v. YOUTUBE, INC., et al.

No. 19-5999

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (a) | A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 has been made under my supervision. |

|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (b) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period. |

|                                                                                                                           |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                           |
| /s/ Ryan M. Hershberger                                                                                                   |
| Ryan M. HershbergerAssistant Treasurer ofFord Motor Credit Company LLC,as Servicer of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2017-C |
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

February 1, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh 135126 Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 135126 COA: 269620 Wayne CC: 05-010643-01 CURTIS ANTHONY GOODMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 28, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VA CATE the defendant’s sentences, and we REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Cour t for resentencing under properly scored guidelines. People v Kimble , 470 Mich 305 (2004). The defendant should have been scored zero points for OV 11 where there was no record eviden ce to support a finding that any charged or uncharg ed criminal sexual penetrati on arose out of a sentencing offense. MCL 777.41(2)(a); People v Johnson , 474 Mich 96 (2006 ). In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not p ersuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

C ORRIGAN , J., not participating for the reasons stated in People v Parsons , order of the Supreme Court, entered Ma rch 6, 2007 (Docket No. 132975).

d0129 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 1, 2008

Clerk
Converted by EDGARwiz


EXHIBIT 10.1




AMENDMENT

TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




May 3, 2012







Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. (“Employer”) and Paul V. Campanelli (“Executive”) are parties to an Employment Agreement, dated March 5, 2008 and as amended effective March 4, 2009 (the “Employment Agreement”).  Employer and Executive wish to amend the Employment Agreement, as set forth herein (the “Amendment”) and effective as of the date set forth above (the “Amendment Date”).  Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the same meanings as in the Employment Agreement.




NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties amend the Employment Agreement as follows:




1.

Section 3.3.7 of the Agreement is amended by adding a new subsection (f) to read as follows:




(f)

Notwithstanding the provisions of this Section 3.3.7 above, with respect to the equity awards granted to Executive on January 5, 2012 under the Employer’s 2004 Performance Equity Plan as part of the 2012 Long Term Incentive Program, consisting of Performance Share Units, Restricted Stock Units and Stock Options (collectively, the “2012 LTI Equity Awards”), the effect of a termination of the Executive’s employment with the Employer or any affiliate or subsidiary of the Employer shall be subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the applicable award agreements relating to the 2012 LTI Equity Awards and the 2004 Performance Equity Plan, and the provisions of this Section 3.3.7 shall not be effective with respect to such awards other than to the extent certain defined terms are incorporated into the award agreements for the 2012 LTI Equity Awards.  




* * * * *




Except as expressly amended hereby, the Employment Agreement remains in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent that there is any inconsistency between the provisions of the Employment Agreement and this Amendment, the provisions of this Amendment shall control.  This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New Jersey applicable to contracts made and to be wholly performed therein.









- 1 -



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment on May 3, 2012.







PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.




/s/ Stephen Montalto




By:  Senior Vice President, Human Resources







EXECUTIVE




PAUL V. CAMPANELLI




/s/ Paul V. Campanelli









- 2 -
III 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 20 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 7, 2013 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony to award the Congressional Gold Medal to Professor Muhammad Yunus. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF ROTUNDA FOR CEREMONY TO AWARD 

4 CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL TO PRO5 FESSOR MUHAMMAD YUNUS. 

6 The rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used 

7 on April 17, 2013, for a ceremony to award the 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HCON 20 RDS 

1 Congressional Gold Medal to Professor Muhammad Yunus 

2 in recognition of his contributions to the fight against 

3 global poverty. Physical preparations for the ceremony 

4 shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as 

5 the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 6, 

2013. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Clifford B. GANDY, Jr., Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5089

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Robert Ryan SNYDER, Petitioner v. CALIFORNIA

No. 19-195

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
Susan PEARSALL, Petitioner v. Thomas C. GUERNSEY, DDS; Joseph's/Candler Health System, Inc.

No. 19-823.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

The petition for rehearing is denied.
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS 

OFFI<!J~Ato~G{g~~~~~L sT~TioN .Aus:r.IN, .aXAs l§.s~PosTAGE)>PITNEYaowes 0(1) 

STATE OF TEXAS~· :;v ~-<·""'."" "':'-t~""""' ~~·· d e=7..c:==7 IJ'l!= 

~ §~ PENALTYFOR .~, ,·c.~tw,1f == 

PRIVATE USE .<!~()~·~.§~"~,~ : ~~ ~~ 1 $ (0)(0)(0).~1 5 

~~t...!.&Z:3=. 0001401623 JUL. 02. 20 15 

~i!~~:~G, PATRICK LYRO~~~-t.T~Ja~~: \ '•, <> ... ,<-' ~ -..~, . ~ ifs209-L ~\f WR-71,768-13 .l 

On this day, the application for~1, 1 ~~~"Y'!ll?~ef ~j:1beas Corpus has been received 

and presented to the Court. ~>~£~'~;t~:/.P"' 

·~38 77079 

~ ~, ~ Abel Acosta, Clerk 

~--. r/.1 ~~ IV ~TRf'CK'~ Y~~(§TARLING sf1U;rHEASjy~XAS TRANSITIONAL C. ENT. ER 

1 09S~~LfrvruNT HWY . t 

HOUS I'~ TX 77078 . A~'l K I 

~ \ 

' :\ 

,, ' 

•-tltl• • • ••• 11

1

·•1t1ttl 11•t 1 I'''''' ·''·ll··rllrllh ·'·llttr'l' 'I'·
James Arthur ROSS, Petitioner, v. John MYRICK, Superintendent, Two Rivers Correctional Institution, et al.

No. 19-5844

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Sergei KOVALEV, Petitioner v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA, et al.

No. 19-6274

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                            8888
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,743
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,071
<INVENTORY>                                     13,571
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,838
<PP&E>                                          83,799
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,833
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 120,260
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,743
<BONDS>                                         15,714
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           119
<OTHER-SE>                                      67,927
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   120,260
<SALES>                                         46,408
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,408
<CGS>                                           28,526
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,338
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   168
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 478
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,995
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,885
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,110
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,110
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26
        


</TABLE>
|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|    | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                       |        |                                         |
|----------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|                       |   |                                         |   |
| Date:      August 23, 2010 | By:    | /s/      Cary J. Claiborne                   |   |
|                       |   | Cary      J. Claiborne                       |   |
|                       |   | President      & Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                       |   | (principal      executive officer)           |   |

----
Michael Ramon OCHOA, Petitioner, v. Arthur LEVINE, et al.

No. 19-904.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh Office denied.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Peter R. Huntsman, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Huntsman LLC for the three months ended September 30, 2004;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of and for the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
November 19, 2004

| |  | /s/ Peter R. HuntsmanPeter R. Huntsman Chief Executive Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks