alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1059 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Acid Orange 116. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2013 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Acid Orange 

116. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ACID ORANGE 116. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.03.65 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Acid Orange 116) is amended by striking the date in the 

7 effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2016’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1059 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Amendment to Gas Purchase Agreement dated January 11, 2012



 Exhibit 10.22 
 AMENDMENT 
 TO 

GAS PURCHASE AGREEMENT 
 THIS AMENDMENT to that certain Gas Purchase Agreement, dated May 1, 2009, as amended, is made and entered into this 11th day of January, 2012, by and between MidMar Gas LLC (successor to
Feagan Gathering Company insofar as this Agreement is concerned) (“Buyer”) and Windsor Permian LLC (“Seller”). 
 RECITALS 
 WHEREAS, Buyer and Seller are parties to that certain Gas
Purchase Agreement dated May 1, 2009, as amended, (the “Agreement”) covering the purchase and sale of gas produced from wells located on the acreage described in Exhibit “A” to the Agreement, and 

WHEREAS, Buyer and Seller would like to release from the Agreement a portion of the gas committed under the Agreement in order for
Seller to market such gas to a purchaser other than Buyer. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of mutual
covenants and conditions contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto mutually agree as follows: 

“Effective March 1, 2012, all gas produced from wells located on the acreage described below is hereby released from the Agreement on a
month-to-month basis subject to Buyer’s express right to re-establish the purchase of such gas in accordance with the Agreement at any time effective on or after January 1, 2017 by providing Seller at least thirty (30) days written
notice.” 
  

					
	 Lease Name
	  	 Acreage Description
	  	 County, State

	 Windsor Hurt Lease (WHL)
	  	 Sections 2, 4, 9, 10 and 11

Block 42, Township 1 South,
 T&P RR Co.
Survey
	  	Ector, Texas

 Except as herein amended, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect as previously written. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed
as of the day and year first written above. 
  

									
	“Buyer”	 		 	“Seller”
			
	MidMar Gas LLC	 		 	Windsor Permian LLC
					
	By:	 	/s/ Mike Feagan	 		 	By:	 	/s/ Travis D. Stice
	Title:	 	Vice President	 		 	Title:	 	President & CEO


  
 2
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 Eastern District of Texas COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 2:23-cv-00454 COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC 10/09/2023 /s/ Neil A. Rubin Neil A. Rubin SBN 250761

RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT 

12424 Wilshire Blvd, 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90025

nrubin@raklaw.com (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP Document 12 Filed 10/09/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 59
Cuwan MERRITT, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8050.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit 

______________________ 

IN RE BERTRAND MARC

____________________ 

2010-1540 

(Serial No. 10/468,449) 

______________________

 

 Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT 

______________________ 

JEFFREY M. GOEHRING, Young & Thompson, of 

Alexandria, Virginia, argued for the appellant. With him 

on the brief was Andrew J. Patch. 

 JOSEPH G. PICCOLO, Associate Solicitor, Office of the 

Solicitors, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of 

Alexandria, Virginia argued for appellee. With him on 

the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, and BRIAN T.

RACILLA, Associate Solicitor. 

______________________ 
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (LINN, CLEVENGER, and MOORE, Circuit 

Judges). 

 AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 May 12, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly

 Date Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
         
<S>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>            6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                              1
<CASH>                                  18,737
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                           14,480
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        94,570
<PP&E>                               1,933,089
<DEPRECIATION>                          93,797
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       1,933,862
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   90,404
<BONDS>                              1,152,133
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                137
<COMMON>                                   420
<OTHER-SE>                             636,356
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         1,933,862
<SALES>                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        82,272
<CGS>                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           67,662
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         2,298
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           530
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      19,313
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (3,093)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (3,093)
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                            (3,093)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            (0.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                            (0.49)
        

</TABLE>
Francisco SUAREZ, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6067

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Julian MADERO-DIAZ, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6088

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 **ANNUALSTATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

** **

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreementdated as of December 1, 2017, by and among UBS COMMERCIAL MORTGAGESECURITIZATION CORP., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asMaster Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, WELLS FARGOBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, WILMINGTON TRUST,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, and PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as OperatingAdvisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2017-C6 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton,Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.      A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during theperiod from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”),and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made undermy supervision, and

 

2.      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the MasterServicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in allmaterial respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
EX-32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CEO
                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1

                    SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the quarterly report of Azul Studios  International Inc. (the
"Company") on Form l0-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005,  James Vandeberg,
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the SARBANES - OXLEY
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1. The quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

2. The information  contained in the quarterly  report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



Date: June 23, 2006
                              By: James Vandeberg, President, CEO & Director
                                  ---------------
Marco Antonio MURILLO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6019.

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 21, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-30922

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARCUS W CLAYTON

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:06-CR-222-1

Before KING, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Marcus W. Clayton appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea

to possession with intent to distribute cocaine. He argues that the district court

plainly erred in upwardly departing from the advisory guidelines range by

failing to provide fact-specific reasons for its judgment. 

The record refutes Clayton’s contention that the district court

impermissibly relied on his arrest history in upwardly departing. The record

instead discloses that Clayton engaged in ongoing criminal conduct of a serious

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 18, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-30922

2

nature, including drug and unlawful possession of a firearm crimes that were

similar to the instant offense of conviction, conduct sufficient to support the

district court’s decision to upwardly depart from the advisory guidelines range.

See U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3, cmt. (n.2(B)) (2006); United States v. Lee, 358 F.3d 315, 329

(5th Cir. 2004).

Additionally, Clayton’s commission of the instant offense while on federal

supervised release and the revocation of his state probation following a drug

arrest were reliable facts from which the district court could infer that Clayton

was likely to reoffend, also warranting an upward departure. See § 4A1.3(a)(1);

Lee, 358 F.3d at 328-29. Clayton therefore has not established plain error on the

part of the district court. See United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 520 (5th Cir.

2005).

AFFIRMED.
Bonnie R. FOWLER, Petitioner v. UTAH, et al.

No. 18-1340

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
Kavin Maurice RHODES, Petitioner v. Peter C. SWARTH, et al.

No. 19-5925

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Erika JACOBS, Petitioner, v. MARICOPA INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE SYSTEM.

No. 19-7556.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 6, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One denied.
Shlomit RUTTKAMP, Petitioner, v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, fka The Bank of New York.

No. 19-8037.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until June 8, 2020, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a).
Senol YILMAZ, Petitioner, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 19M48.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 7, 2019.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari out of time denied.
# C_2018365EN.01000201.xml

| 9.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 365/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 365/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8991 — Alphabet/ResMed/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 365/03)

On 1 October 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8991. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8991. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
RAINBOW RIDGE RESORT, LLC, et al., Petitioners, v. BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY.

No. 19-381

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

*456Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Eastern Division denied.
Clyde M. JONES, Petitioner v. Darrel VANNOY, Warden

No. 19-5625

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# TIME AND DATE: 

June 22, 2022, at 9:00 a.m.

# PLACE: 

Atlanta, GA.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

## Wednesday, June 22, 2022, at 9:00 a.m.

1. Strategic Issues.

2. Financial and Operational Issues.

3. Executive Session.

4. Administrative Items.

# GENERAL COUNSEL CERTIFICATION: 

The General Counsel of the United States Postal Service has certified that the meeting may be closed under the Government in the Sunshine Act.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Michael J. Elston, Secretary of the Board of Governors, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW, Washington, DC 20260-1000. Telephone: (202) 268-4800.

Michael J. Elston,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-12628 Filed 6-8-22; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Eddie David COX, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5027

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Rehaif* v. *United States* , 588 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 2191, 204 L.Ed.2d 594 (2019).
LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, et al., Petitioners, v. EDWARDS AQUIFER AUTHORITY, et al.

No. 19-687.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Marian Papacsi OWENS, Petitioner v. Sue MICKENS, Warden, et al.

No. 19-6152

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
| (logo) WELLS 

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Fl  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is herebymade to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1,2017, by and among BANC OF AMERICA MERRILL LYNCH COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE INC., asDepositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTOCAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Trustee, and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as OperatingAdvisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer, with respect to CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2017-BNK9 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. 

 

Pursuant to Section11.09 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that: 

 

1.           A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January 1,2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performanceper the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision,and  

 

2.           To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer, has fulfilledall of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe period January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018. 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February2019. 

 

/s/ Leslie Hayton  

Leslie Hayton 

Managing Director                             

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD.

Plaintiff,

v.

BOE TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO., LTD. 

and MIANYANG BOE

OPTOELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY 

CO., LTD.

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00309-JRG

PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION

TO STAY PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1659(a)

Before the Court is the Unopposed Motion to Stay Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1659(a) filed

by BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd., and Mianyang BOE Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. 

(collectively “Defendants”). After considering the same, the Motion is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED that the above-captioned action is STAYED pending resolution of

the Investigation pending before the United States International Trade Commission and instituted 

as In the Matter of Certain Active Matrix Organic Light-Emitting Diode Display Panels And 

Modules For Mobile Devices, And Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-1351.

Case 2:23-cv-00309-JRG-RSP Document 6-6 Filed 07/21/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 749