alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KYUNG ROK MIN,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-70114

Agency No. A089-168-889

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 18, 2014**

Before: LEAVY, FISHER, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Kyung Rok Min, a native and citizen of South Korea, petitions for review of 

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of 

removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have 

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence factual 

 

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

NOV 28 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 13-70114

findings, Ayala v. Holder, 640 F.3d 1095, 1097 (9th Cir. 2011) (per curiam), and we 

deny the petition for review. 

The record does not compel the conclusion that Min established extraordinary 

circumstances to excuse his untimely asylum application. See 8 C.F.R. § 

1208.4(a)(5); see also Dhital v. Mukasey, 532 F.3d 1044, 1049 (9th Cir. 2008). 

Thus, Min’s asylum claim fails.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s finding that Min did not establish 

that his membership in a particular social group of former police officers was one 

central reason for why he was threatened and fears future harm. See Ayala, 640 

F.3d at 1098 (evidence demonstrated former officer was shot at and threatened 

because he had arrested particular criminal, not on account of his status as a former 

police officer). Thus, Min’s withholding of removal claim fails. 

Finally, substantial evidence supports the BIA’s denial of Min’s CAT claim 

because he failed to show it is more likely than not that he would be tortured with the 

consent or acquiescence of the South Korean government. See Wakkary v. Holder, 

558 F.3d 1049, 1097-98 (9th Cir. 2009).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
ROCKWOOD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, et al.

No. 19-23

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 12, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
# C_2017167EN.01000301.xml

| 25.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 167/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/3

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 224/2014 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/890 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in the Central African Republic apply

(2017/C 167/02)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) No 224/2014 (2), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/890 (3).

2

3

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union, represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council, and the department entrusted with the processing operation is Unit 1C, which can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 224/2014, as implemented by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/890.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil the listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (4).

4

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 70, 11.3.2014, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 138, 25.5.2017, p. 1.

3

(4)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

4

---
SAUK PRAIRIE CONSERVATION ALLIANCE, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, et al.

No. 19-1119.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
# C_2018062EN.01000101.xml

| 17.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 62/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 62/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8549 — Groupe Lactalis/Omira)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 62/01)

On 31 August 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8549. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8549. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 02/25/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       60,505
COMMITMENTS
  16,473    5,732    2,542   25,978   38,878   44,993   47,152   15,512   13,353

CHANGES FROM 02/18/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,977)
     745     -159      200   -2,490   -1,792   -1,545   -1,751     -432     -226

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    27.2      9.5      4.2     42.9     64.3     74.4     77.9     25.6     22.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       75)
      26        8       11       34       25       65       41
```

----

Updated February 28, 2014
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________

No. 96-60830

_______________

PAUL L. TREGRE, JR.,

Petitioner-Appellant,

VERSUS

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent-Appellee.

_________________________

Appeal from the Decision of the United States Tax Court

(5464-94)

_________________________

October 10, 1997

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

We have reviewed the briefs and pertinent portions of the

record and have heard the arguments of counsel. We conclude that

the facts found by the Tax Court are not clearly erroneous and that

the Commissioner met her burden by clear and convincing evidence.

There is no error in the finding of fraud or in the determination

of an underpayment of tax. 
2

The decision of the Tax Court, accordingly, is AFFIRMED.
SMITH BARNEY GOVERNMENT SECURITIES FUND (the "Fund")


Supplement dated November 1, 1996 to Prospectus dated April 29, 1996

The following information supplements the information contained in the Fund's 
Prospectus under the section "Investment Objective and Management Policies":

	Zero Coupon Securities.  The Fund may also invest in zero 
coupon bonds.  A zero coupon bond pays no interest in cash to its 
holder during its life, although interest is accrued during that 
period.  Its value to an investor consists of the difference 
between its face value at the time of maturity and the price for 
which it was acquired, which is generally an amount significantly 
less than its face value (sometimes referred to as a "deep 
discount" price).  Because such securities usually trade at a deep 
discount, they will be subject to greater fluctuations of market 
value in response to changing interest rates than debt obligations 
of comparable maturities which make periodic distributions of 
interest.  On the other hand, because there are no periodic 
interest payments to be reinvested prior to maturity, zero coupon 
securities eliminate the reinvestment risk and lock in a rate of 
return to maturity.

	Dollar Roll Transactions.  The Fund may enter into "dollar 
rolls", in which the Fund sells fixed income securities and 
simultaneously contracts to repurchase substantially similar (same 
type, coupon and maturity) securities on a specified future date.  
During this "roll" period, the Fund would forego principal and 
interest paid on such securities.  The Fund would be compensated 
by the difference between the current sales price and the forward 
price for the future purchase, as well as by the interest earned 
on the cash proceed of the initial sale.  Since the Fund will 
receive interest on the securities in which it invests the 
transaction proceeds, such transactions may involve leverage.  
However, since the proceeds will be invested only in U.S. Treasury 
obligations and since the Fund will enter into dollar roll 
transactions only with dealers of sufficient creditworthiness in 
the judgment of the Fund's investment adviser, such transactions 
do not present the risks to the Fund that are associated with 
other types of leverage.  Dollar roll transactions are considered 
borrowings by the Fund and will be subject to the Fund's overall 
borrowing limitation.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

 Plaintiff,

v.

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP

(LEAD CASE)

ORDER

It is ORDERED that Michael Paul is hereby appointed as the Court’s technical advisor in 

the above-captioned case, with his fees and expenses to be assessed equally between Plaintiff and 

Defendants and timely paid as billed. Mr. Paul’s contact information is as follows:

Michael D. Paul 

Michael D. Paul, PLLC

26110 High Timber Pass St.

San Antonio, TX 78260-8041

Phone: (210) 473-8696

Email: mdeanpaul@gmail.com

The parties are ORDERED to send courtesy copies of claim construction briefs, exhibits, 

and technology tutorials in PDF form to mdeanpaul@gmail.com. If the document was filed with 

the Court, the copy must include the CM/ECF header. For claim construction materials that have 

already been filed, the filing party is ORDERED to provide copies to Mr. Paul within two business 

days. Otherwise, the filing party is ORDERED to provide copies to Mr. Paul no later than one 

business day after filing future claim construction material.

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP Document 66 Filed 10/03/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 547
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Fl  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

** **

Reference is herebymade to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2017,by and among LSTAR DEPOSITOR, LLC, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, HUDSON AMERICAS L.P., as Special Servicer,WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as TaxAdministrator and as Custodian and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asTrustee with respect to LSTAR Commercial Mortgage Trust, Series 2017-5 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section3.13 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of theactivities of the  Master Servicer during the period from March 1, 2017through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance perthe Agreement during the Reporting Period has been made under my supervision,and 

 

2. To the best ofmy knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all ofits obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February2018.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive VicePresident 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Valerie FLORES, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6177

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 12, 2019

*505Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund V L.P. (the "Fund") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the Fund's general partner, Boston Capital Associates V L.L.C., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                  
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.



|                |  |                            
|--------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:           |  |                            
|August 14, 2008 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|                |  |                            
|                |  | Marc N. Teal               
|                |  | Principal Financial Officer
|                |  |                            
|                |  |                            



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 113 (Monday, June 13, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 35718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12601]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

49 CFR Parts 525 and 531

[NHTSA-2008-0115]


Exemptions From Average Fuel Economy Standards; Passenger 
Automobile Average Fuel Economy Standards

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NHTSA is withdrawing a proposed decision granting an exemption 
to Mosler Automotive (Mosler) from the industry-wide passenger car 
Corporate Average Fuel Economy standard for model years 2008-2010 and 
setting alternative standards for Mosler for those model years. Mosler 
did not produce any vehicles during those model years, and therefore 
granting the exemption would serve no useful purpose.

DATES: NHTSA is withdrawing the proposed rule published June 17, 2008 
(73 FR 34242) as of June 13, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Bayer, Engineer, Fuel Economy 
Division, Office of Rulemaking, by phone at (202) 366-9540 or by fax at 
(202) 493-2290 or Hannah Fish, Attorney Advisor, Vehicle Standards and 
Harmonization, Office of the Chief Counsel, by phone at (202) 366-2992 
or by fax at (202) 366-3820.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NHTSA received a petition from Mosler on 
June 19, 2007, seeking exemption from the passenger automobile fuel 
economy standards for model years (MYs) 2008 through 2010. In its 
petition, Mosler stated that it manufactured 15 vehicles in 2004. 
Mosler estimated that it would produce 40 vehicles in 2008, 50 vehicles 
in 2009, and 60 vehicles in 2010. NHTSA published a proposed decision 
establishing an alternative standard for Mosler for MYs 2008-2010 at 73 
FR 34242 (June 17, 2008). NHTSA has since confirmed that Mosler did not 
produce any vehicles for those model years. Therefore, NHTSA is 
withdrawing the June 17, 2008 proposed grant of exemption and 
establishment of alternative standards, because granting the exemption 
would serve no useful purpose.

    Issued in Washington, DC, under authority delegated in 49 CFR 
1.95.
Steven S. Cliff,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2022-12601 Filed 6-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
Terry Lee O'BRIEN, Petitioner v. Carla HACKER-AGNEW, Warden, et al.

No. 19-5649

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 21, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# C_2018234EN.01000101.xml

| 5.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/1

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case M.8674 — BASF/Solvay’s EP and P&I Business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 234/01)

On 26 June 2018, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the abovementioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the internal market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

1

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.8674 — BASF/Solvay’s EP and P&I Business, to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 29, 2022. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, July 29, 2022 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A22I0224. NATIONAL EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES INC. d/b/a NATIONAL EMS v. CAROLINE SMITH et al.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: SU20CV0433
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, petitioner, v. The KIMBERLY RICE KAESTNER 1992 FAMILY TRUST.

No. 18-457.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 11, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of North Carolina granted.
Eric D. CONNER, Petitioner, v. Stacey L. HOEM, et al.

No. 19-5368

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Bobby MARTIN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9185

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of *United States* v. *Davis* , 588 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 2319, 204 L.Ed.2d 757 (2019).

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.