alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN RE Steven CIOTTA, Petitioner.

No. 19-8345.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petition in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin* v. *District of Columbia Court of Appeals* , 506 U.S. 1 (1992) (*per curiam* ).
Samuel Rivera ROSADO, Petitioner v. LUCID ENERGY, INC.

No. 19-5299

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000797480
<NAME> SMITH BARNEY SECTOR SERIES
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER>003
   <NAME>SMITH BARNEY HEALTH SCIENCES FUND

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              8 Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   OCT-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                        OCT-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>               61,246,533
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>              71,543,348
<RECEIVABLES>                        1,221,712
<ASSETS-OTHER>                               0
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      72,765,060
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>               173,198
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                      0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                    0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                    173,198
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                              0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>            60,126,510
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                1,989,567
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                        0
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                    0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                (407,396)
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>              1,930,048
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                     0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>            10,296,815
<NET-ASSETS>                        71,945,977
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                      239,295
<INTEREST-INCOME>                       37,686
<OTHER-INCOME>                               0
<EXPENSES-NET>                         684,377
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>               (407,396)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>             1,930,048
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>           10,296,815
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>               11,819,467
<EQUALIZATION>                               0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                    0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                     0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                        0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>             70,184,936
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>        (10,058,426)
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                          0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>              71,945,977
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                      0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                    0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                      0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                   0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                  261,782
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                        821,086
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                19,468,597
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                    11.40
<PER-SHARE-NII>                          (0.09)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                   0.00
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                      0.00
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                 0.00
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                      0.00
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                      14.42
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                           2.25
[AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING]                       0
[AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE]                         0



</TABLE>
Kevin ROBINSON, Petitioner v. Steven JOHNSON, Administrator, New Jersey State Prison ;

No. 18-9045

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 131 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 

2015, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2015 

4 (Public Law 113–164) is further amended by striking the 
2 

•HJ 131 EH 

1 date specified in section 106(3) and inserting ‘‘December 

2 17, 2014’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 12, 

2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 131 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal 

year 2015, and for other purposes.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED
MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,018
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   83,715
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,512
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                98,307
<PP&E>                                         543,905
<DEPRECIATION>                                 145,278
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 622,997
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          118,892
<BONDS>                                        202,150
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           294
<OTHER-SE>                                     224,242
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   622,997
<SALES>                                        190,854
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               190,854
<CGS>                                          171,652
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  176,759
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,868
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,554
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,025)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,173)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,852)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,852)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>
H. Con. Res. 90 Agreed to April 8, 2014

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR HOLOCAUST DAYS OF 

REMEMBRANCE CEREMONY. 

Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center is authorized 

to be used on April 30, 2014, for a ceremony as part of the 

commemoration of the days of remembrance of victims of the Holocaust. Physical preparations for the conduct of the ceremony shall 

be carried out in accordance with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate.
Franco Nicholas PADGETT, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8144.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Lakshmi ARUNACHALAM, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, et al.

No. 18-9383

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Because the Court lacks a quorum, 28 U.S.C. § 1, and since the qualified Justices are of the opinion that the case cannot be heard and determined at the next Term of the Court, the judgment is affirmed under 28 U.S.C. § 2109, which provides that under this circumstances "the court shall enter its order affirming the judgment of the court from which the case was brought for review with the same effect as upon affirmance by an equally divided court."

Justice Thomas, Justice Ginsburg, Justice Breyer, Justice Alito, Justice Sotomayor, and Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 51 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 51

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                         relating to marriage.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 28, 2013

   Mr. Huelskamp (for himself, Mr. Broun of Georgia, Mr. Pitts, Mr. 
Jordan, Mr. Westmoreland, Mr. Pittenger, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. 
Barton, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. Brooks of Alabama, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. 
   Jones, Mr. Meadows, Mr. Pearce, Mr. Duncan of South Carolina, Mr. 
  Fleming, Mr. Neugebauer, Mr. Harris, Mr. Walberg, Mr. Palazzo, Mr. 
Shuster, Mr. Hall, Mr. Bridenstine, Mr. Schweikert, Mr. Wolf, Mr. Smith 
of New Jersey, Mr. Stockman, Mr. Hultgren, and Mr. Lankford) introduced 
the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                         relating to marriage.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein),

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This joint resolution may be cited as the ``Marriage Protection 
Amendment''.

SEC. 2. CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.

    The following article is proposed as an amendment to the 
Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents 
and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the 
legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years 
after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Marriage in the United States shall consist only of the union of 
a man and a woman. Neither this Constitution, nor the constitution of 
any State, shall be construed to require that marriage or the legal 
incidents thereof be conferred upon any union other than the union of a 
man and a woman.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Opinion Research Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, John F. Short, Chairman, CEO and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: |  | November 14, 2003 |  | Signed: |  | /s/ John F. Short          
|----- |  | ----------------- |  | ------- |  | ---------------------------
|      |  |                   |  | Name:   |  | John F. Short              
|      |  |                   |  | Title:  |  | Chairman, CEO and President
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1135 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1135

To amend the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 
  to repeal certain additional disclosure requirements, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 13, 2013

 Mr. Huizenga of Michigan (for himself and Mr. Garrett) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 
  to repeal certain additional disclosure requirements, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Burdensome Data Collection Relief 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS.

    Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer 
Protection Act (15 U.S.C. 781 note) is hereby repealed and any 
regulations issued pursuant to such subsection shall have no force or 
effect.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2018318EN.01000301.xml

| 10.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 318/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 318/3

---

Special Report No 22/2018

‘Mobility under Erasmus+: Millions of participants and multi-faceted European Added Value, however performance measurement needs to be further improved’

(2018/C 318/03)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 22/2018 ‘Mobility under Erasmus+: Millions of participants and multi-faceted European Added Value, however performance measurement needs to be further improved’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://eca.europa.eu

---
Keith Clayton BROOKS Jr., Petitioner v. David GABRIEL, et al.

No. 18-9023

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
Cecil BOYETT, Petitioner, v. NEW MEXICO.

No. 19-7275.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for rehearing denied.
Charles TALBERT, Petitioner, v. Blanche CARNEY, et al.

No. 19-8167.

Supreme Court of the United States.

June 1, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 31(i)
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. ss 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Randy S. Selman, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Visual Data Corporation.
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's control over financial reporting; and.
 
 5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: August 27, 2004
By:
/s/ Randy S. SelmanRandy S. SelmanPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Memorandum of Proposed Amendments to the Company's Non-Qualified Pension Plan



  
 Exhibit 10-h-2 
  
 MEMORANDUM OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS 
 TO THE 
 ROCKWELL COLLINS
NON-QUALIFIED PENSION PLAN 
  
 It is proposed that the Rockwell Collins
Non-Qualified Pension Plan (the “Plan”) be amended, effective as of September 30, 2006, in order to carry out the determination of this Company’s Board of Directors to discontinue and terminate, as of the close of business on such
date, further accrual of benefits by all Participants in the said Plan and to terminate the eligibility of Company employees to become new Participants in the Plan after such date. 
  
 It is specifically proposed to: 
  

	(1)	Add the following Preamble to the Plan, such Preamble to read as follows: 

  
 In June 2003, the Board of Directors of Rockwell Collins approved a freezing of the Rockwell Collins Pension Plan, which on November 6, 2003 the Board of
Directors of Rockwell Collins confirmed was to have the effect of freezing this Plan. The said freezing of the Plan, which is effective as of the close of business on September 30, 2006 (the “Freeze Date”), has the effect of terminating
further accrual of benefits under the Plan as of that Date and closing Plan participation off for new employees after that Freeze Date. 
  

	(2)	Add a new Section 2.005 to the Plan, such new Section to read as follows: 

  
 2.005 Effective as of the close of business on September 30, 2006 (the “Freeze Date”), and notwithstanding any other provision in this
Plan (or in the Rockwell Collins Pension Plan) to the contrary, accrual of additional benefits under this Plan (as well as under the Rockwell Collins Pension Plan) will no longer be possible for current Plan Participants and individuals who first
become Employees on or after the said Freeze Date will not be eligible to become Participants in this Plan after the said Freeze Date.
Reyes VEGA, aka Ray Vega, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5080

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Robert HERCENBERGER, Petitioner, v. Gary A. MARTIN.

No. 19-6598.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for rehearing denied.
Erica Y. BRYANT, et al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 19-982.

Supreme Court of the United States.

June 1, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# C_2018258EN.01000102.xml

| 23.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 258/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 258/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8997 — Whirlpool/Elica/Elica PB India Private Limited)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 258/02)

On 17 July 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8997. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8997. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2017384EN.01000501.xml

| 14.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 384/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 384/5

---

EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR DISEASE PREVENTION AND CONTROL

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2016

(2017/C 384/16)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/aboutus/access_documents/Pages/Financial_information.aspx

---