Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 111 / Thursday, June 9, 2022 / Notices 35163 

1See Certain Vertical Shaft Engines Between 

225cc and 999cc, and Parts Thereof from the 

People’s Republic of China: Amended Final 

Antidumping Duty Determination and 

Antidumping Duty Order, 86 FR 12623 (March 4, 

2021) (Amended Final Determination and Order); 

see also Certain Large Vertical Shaft Engines 

Between 225cc and 999cc, and Parts Thereof, from 

the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Correction 

to the Amended Final Antidumping Duty 

Determination and Antidumping Duty Order, 86 FR 

13694 (March 10, 2021). 

2See Initiation of Antidumping Duty Changed 

Circumstances Review: Certain Vertical Shaft 

Engines Between 225cc and 999cc, and Parts 

Thereof from the People’s Republic of China, 86 FR 

9573 (February 22, 2022) (Initiation Notice). 

3See 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii). 

4See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Certain Vertical Shaft 

Engines Between 225cc and 999cc, and Parts 

Thereof from the People’s Republic of China: 

Changed Circumstances Review; Second 

Supplemental Questionnaire,’’ dated February 15, 

2022. 

5See Honda’s Letter, ‘‘Certain Vertical Shaft 

Engines Between 225cc and 999cc, and Parts 

Thereof from the People’s Republic of China: 

Changed Circumstances Review; Second 

Supplemental Questionnaire,’’ dated March 8, 2022. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Vertical Shaft 

Engines Between 225cc and 999cc, and Parts 

Thereof from the People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results of the Changed Circumstances 

Review; Preliminary Decision Memorandum,’’ 

dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, 

this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 

7See, e.g., Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from 

France: Final Results of Changed-Circumstances 

Review, 75 FR 34688 (June 18, 2010), and 

accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum 

(IDM) at Comment 1. 

exporters who are not under review in 

this segment of the proceeding but who 

have separate rates, the cash deposit rate 

will continue to be the exporter-specific 

rate published for the most recent 

period; (2) for all Chinese exporters of 

subject merchandise that have not been 

found to be entitled to a separate rate, 

the cash deposit rate will be the Chinawide rate of 236.00 percent; and (3) for 

all non-Chinese exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not received 

their own rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the rate applicable to Chinese 

exporter(s) that supplied that nonChinese exporter. These deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of ADs 

prior to liquidation of the relevant 

entries during this review period. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of ADs 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double ADs. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

preliminary results in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: June 2, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

1. Autong Industry Co., Ltd. 

2. Dandong Xinxing Carbon Co., Ltd. 

3. Fedmet Resources Corporation 

4. Fengchi Imp. and Exp. Co., Ltd. 

5. Fengchi Imp. and Exp. Co., Ltd. of 

Haicheng City 

6. Fengchi Mining Co., Ltd. of Haicheng City 

7. Fengchi Refractories Co., of Haicheng City 

8. FRC Global Inc. 

9. Haicheng Donghe Taidi Refractory Co., 

Ltd. 

10. Henan Xintuo Refractory Co., Ltd. 

11. Liaoning Fucheng Refractories 

12. Liaoning Zhongmei High Temperature 

Material Co., Ltd. 

13. Liaoning Zhongmei Holding Co., Ltd. 

14. PRCO America Inc. 

15. Puyang Refractories Co., Ltd. 

16. Puyang Refractories Group Co., Ltd. 

17. Qingdao Wonjin Special Refractory 

Material Co., Ltd. 

18. RHI Refractories Liaoning Co., Ltd. 

19. Shenglong Refractories Co., Ltd. 

20. SL Refractories LLC 

21. Tangshan Strong Refractories Co., Ltd. 

22. The Economic Trading Group Of 

Haicheng Houying Corp. Ltd. 

23. Wonjin Refractory Co., Ltd. 

24. Yingkou Heping Samwha Minerals, Co., 

Ltd. 

25. Yingkou Heping Sanhua Materials Co., 

Ltd. 

26. Yingkou Hongyu Wonjin Refractory 

Material Co., Ltd. 

27. Yingkou Mei’ao Mining Product Co., Ltd. 

28. Zibo Fubang Wonjin Refractory 

Technology Co., Ltd. 

29. Zibo Hengsen Refractory Co., Ltd. 

30. Zibo Hitech Material Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2022–12429 Filed 6–8–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–119] 

Preliminary Results of Changed 

Circumstances Review: Antidumping 

Duty Order on Certain Vertical Shaft 

Engines Between 225cc and 999cc, 

and Parts Thereof From the People’s 

Republic of China 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily determines 

that Honda Power Products (China) Co., 

Ltd. (Honda) is the successor-in-interest 

to Jialing-Honda Motors Co., Ltd. 

(Jialing) and, accordingly, that subject 

merchandise produced and exported by 

Honda should be assigned the cash 

deposit rate established for subject 

merchandise produced and exported by 

Jialing for purposes of the antidumping 

duty (AD) order on certain vertical shaft 

engines between 225cc and 999cc, and 

parts thereof (vertical shaft engines) 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(China). 

DATES: Applicable June 9, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leo 

Ayala AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3945, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On February 22, 2022, Commerce 

published the initiation of a changed 

circumstances review (CCR) of the AD 

order 1 on vertical shaft engines from 

China.2 Commerce declined to combine 

the Initiation Notice with the 

preliminary results of the CCR,3 citing 

the need to issue an additional 

supplemental questionnaire to Honda 

regarding Honda’s customer base and 

supplier relationships. On February 15, 

2022, we issued a supplemental 

questionnaire to Honda requesting this 

information.4 On March 8, 2022, Honda 

timely responded to this supplemental 

questionnaire.5 No other interested 

party submitted comments or factual 

information regarding Honda’s request. 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the Order 

are large vertical shaft engines from 

China. For a complete description of the 

scope of the Order, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum.6

Legal Framework 

In determining whether one company 

is the successor-in-interest to another 

company as part of an AD proceeding, 

Commerce examines several factors 

including, but not limited to: (1) 

management and ownership; (2) 

production facilities; (3) supplier 

relationships; and (4) customer base.7

Although no single, or even several, of 

these factors will necessarily provide a 

dispositive indication of succession, 

generally, Commerce will consider a 

company to be the successor-in-interest 

if its resulting operation is not 

materially dissimilar to that of its 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
35164 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 111 / Thursday, June 9, 2022 / Notices 

8See, e.g., Fresh and Chilled Atlantic Salmon 

from Norway; Final Results of Changed 

Circumstances Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 64 FR 9979, 9980 (March 1, 1999). 

9See, e.g., id.; and Brass Sheet and Strip from 

Canada: Final Results of Administrative Review, 57 

FR 20461 (May 13, 1992), and accompanying IDM 

at Comment 1. 

10See Certain Vertical Shaft Engines Between 

225cc and 999cc, and Parts Thereof from the 

People’s Republic of China: Amended Final 

Antidumping Duty Determination and 

Antidumping Duty Order, 86 FR 12623 (March 4, 

2021). 

11Commerce is exercising its discretion under 19 

CFR 351.309(d)(1) to alter the time limit for the 

filing of rebuttal briefs. 

12See 19 CFR 351.30(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

13See generally 19 CFR 351.303. 

14See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD 

Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension 

of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 

1See White Grape Juice Concentrate from the 

Republic of Argentina: Initiation of Countervailing 

Duty Investigation, 87 FR 24945 (April 27, 2022). 

2The petitioner is Delano Growers Grape 

Products, LLC. 

predecessor.8 Thus, if the ‘‘totality of 

circumstances’’ demonstrate that, with 

respect to the production and sale of the 

subject merchandise, the new company 

operates as essentially the same 

business entity as the prior company, 

Commerce will assign the successor-ininterest the cash deposit rate of its 

predecessor.9

Preliminary Results of Review 

We preliminarily determine that 

Honda is the successor-in-interest to 

Jialing for purposes of the Order. Record 

evidence submitted by Honda indicates 

that, based on the totality of the 

circumstances under Commerce’s 

successor-in-interest criteria, Honda 

operates as materially the same business 

entity as Jialing with respect to the 

production and sale of subject 

merchandise. In particular, we 

preliminarily find that Honda’s 

management and ownership, production 

facilities, supplier relationships, and 

customer base with regard to the subject 

merchandise are substantially the same 

as Jialing’s before the name change. For 

the complete successor-in-interest 

analysis, see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

Therefore, based on record evidence, 

we preliminarily determine that Honda 

is the successor-in-interest to Jialing and 

the cash deposit rate assigned to Jialing 

should be the rate for Honda as a result 

of our successor-in-interest finding. 

Should our final results of review 

remain the same as these preliminary 

results of review, Honda will be 

assigned the cash deposit rate currently 

assigned to Jialing with respect to the 

subject merchandise (i.e., 261.93 

percent).10 We will thus instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection to 

suspend liquidation of entries of vertical 

shaft engines from China produced and 

exported by Honda, effective on the 

publication date of the final results, at 

the cash deposit rate for estimated 

antidumping duties assigned to Jialing. 

Public Comment 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.309(c)(1)(ii), interested parties may 

submit case briefs not later than 30 days 

after the date of publication of this 

notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues 

raised in the case briefs, may be filed no 

later than seven days after the due date 

for case briefs, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.309(d).11 Parties who submit 

case or rebuttal briefs are encouraged to 

submit with each argument: (1) a 

statement of the issue; (2) a brief 

summary of the argument; and (3) a 

table of authorities.12

All comments are to be filed 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS) 

and must be served on interested 

parties.13 Note that Commerce has 

temporarily modified certain of its 

requirements for serving documents 

containing business proprietary 

information, until further notice.14 An 

electronically filed document must be 

received successfully in its entirety by 

ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on 

the day on which it is due. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), any 

interested party may request a hearing 

within 30 days of publication of this 

notice in the Federal Register. Hearing 

requests should contain the following 

information: (1) The party’s name, 

address, and telephone number; (2) the 

number of participants; and (3) a list of 

the issues to be discussed. Oral 

presentations at the hearing will be 

limited to issues raised in the briefs. If 

a request for a hearing is made, 

Commerce intends to hold the hearing 

at a time and date to be determined. 

Parties should confirm the date and the 

time of the hearing two days before the 

scheduled date. 

Final Results of Review 

Consistent with 19 CFR 351.216(e), 

we intend to issue the final results of 

this CCR no later than 270 days after the 

date on which this review was initiated, 

or within 45 days if all parties agree to 

the outcome of the review. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is published in 

accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: June 2, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2022–12425 Filed 6–8–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–357–826] 

White Grape Juice Concentrate From 

Argentina: Postponement of 

Preliminary Determination in the 

Countervailing Duty Investigation 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Applicable June 9, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Gene H. Calvert, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–3586. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 20, 2022, the U.S. 

Department of Commerce (Commerce) 

initiated a countervailing duty (CVD) 

investigation of imports of white grape 

juice concentrate from Argentina.1

Currently, the preliminary 

determination is due no later than June 

24, 2022. 

Postponement of Preliminary 

Determination 

Section 703(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act), requires 

Commerce to issue the preliminary 

determination in a CVD investigation 

within 65 days after the date on which 

Commerce initiated the investigation. 

However, section 703(c)(1) of the Act 

permits Commerce to postpone the 

preliminary determination until no later 

than 130 days after the date on which 

Commerce initiated the investigation if: 

(A) the petitioner 2 makes a timely 

request for a postponement; or (B) 

Commerce concludes that the parties 

concerned are cooperating, that the 

investigation is extraordinarily 

complicated, and that additional time is 

necessary to make a preliminary 

determination. Under 19 CFR 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1