35654 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 113 / Monday, June 13, 2022 / Rules and Regulations 

Your representative payee should keep 

records of how benefits were used in 

order to provide accounting reports and 

must make those records available upon 

our request. If your representative payee 

fails to provide an annual accounting of 

benefits or other required report, we 

may require your payee to appear in 

person at the local Social Security field 

office or a United States Government 

facility that we designate serving the 

area in which you reside. The decision 

to have your representative payee 

receive your benefits in person may be 

based on a variety of reasons. Some of 

these reasons may include the payee’s 

history of past performance or our past 

difficulty in contacting the payee. We 

may ask your representative payee to 

give us the following information: 

(1) Where you lived during the 

accounting period; 

(2) Who made the decisions on how 

your benefits were spent or saved; 

(3) How your benefit payments were 

used; and 

(4) How much of your benefit 

payments were saved and how the 

savings were invested. 

PART 416—SUPPLEMENTAL 

SECURITY INCOME FOR THE AGED, 

BLIND, AND DISABLED (1950– ) 

Subpart F—Representative Payment 

■ 5. The authority citation for subpart F 

of part 416 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: Secs. 205(j)(1)(C), 702(a)(5), 

1631(a)(2) and (d)(1) of the Social Security 

Act (42 U.S.C. 405(j)(1)(C), 902(a)(5), 

1383(a)(2) and (d)(1)). 

■ 6. Revise § 416.665 to read as follows: 

§ 416.665 How does your representative 

payee account for the use of benefits? 

(a) Your representative payee must 

account for the use of your benefits. We 

require written reports from your 

representative payee at least once a year 

(except as provided in paragraph (b) of 

this section and for certain State 

institutions that participate in a separate 

onsite review program). 

(b) Your representative payee is 

exempt from the accounting 

requirement when your representative 

payee is: 

(1) A natural or adoptive parent of a 

minor child eligible for title XVI 

benefits who primarily resides in the 

same household as the beneficiary; 

(2) A legal guardian of a minor child 

eligible for title XVI benefits who 

primarily resides in the same household 

as the beneficiary; 

(3) A natural or adoptive parent of a 

disabled individual (as defined in 

section 1614(a)(3) of the Act) eligible for 

title XVI benefits who primarily resides 

in the same household as the 

beneficiary; or 

(4) The spouse of an individual 

eligible for title XVI benefits. 

(c) We may verify how your 

representative payee used your benefits. 

Your representative payee should keep 

records of how benefits were used in 

order to make accounting reports and 

must make those records available upon 

our request. If your representative payee 

fails to provide an annual accounting of 

benefits or other required reports, we 

may require your payee to receive your 

benefits in person at the local Social 

Security field office or a United States 

Government facility that we designate 

serving the area in which you reside. 

The decision to have your 

representative payee receive your 

benefits in person may be based on a 

variety of reasons. Some of these 

reasons may include the payee’s history 

of past performance or our past 

difficulty in contacting the payee. We 

may ask your representative payee to 

give us the following information: 

(1) Where you lived during the 

accounting period; 

(2) Who made the decisions on how 

your benefits were spent or saved; 

(3) How your benefit payments were 

used; and 

(4) How much of your benefit 

payments were saved and how the 

savings were invested. 

[FR Doc. 2022–12682 Filed 6–10–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4191–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket Number USCG–2022–0134] 

RIN 1625–AA00 

Safety Zone; Falls Bridge Project, Blue 

Hill, ME 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, Department of 

Homeland Security (DHS). 

ACTION: Temporary final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is 

establishing a temporary safety zone for 

the navigable waters within a 50-yard 

radius from the center of the Falls 

Bridge in Blue Hill, ME. This action is 

necessary to protect personnel, vessels, 

and marine environment from potential 

hazards created by the demolition, 

subsequent removal, and replacement of 

the Falls Bridge. This regulation 

prohibits entry of vessels or persons into 

the safety zone unless authorized by the 

Captain of the Port Northern New 

England or a designated representative. 

DATES: This rule is effective from July 1, 

2022, through June 30, 2024. 

ADDRESSES: To view documents 

mentioned in this preamble as being 

available in the docket, go to https://

www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2022– 

0134 in the search box and click 

‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type 

column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related 

Material.’’ 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this rule, call or 

email Chief Marine Science Technician 

Zachary Wetzel, Waterways 

Management Division, Sector Northern 

New England, U.S. Coast Guard; 

telephone 207–347–5003, email 

Zachary.R.Wetzel@uscg.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations 

CFR Code of Federal Regulations 

COTP Captain of the Port Northern New 

England 

DHS Department of Homeland Security 

FR Federal Register 

NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking 

§ Section 

U.S.C. United States Code 

II. Background Information and 

Regulatory History 

On January 6, 2022, the Maine 

Department of Transportation notified 

Sector Northern New England of an 

upcoming construction project on the 

Falls Bridge in Blue Hill, ME. In 

response, on April 22, 2022, the Coast 

Guard published a notice of purposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) titled ‘‘Safety Zone; 

Falls Bridge Project, Blue Hill, ME’’ (87 

FR 24088). There we stated why we 

issued the NPRM, and invited 

comments on our proposed regulatory 

action related to this construction 

project. During the comment period that 

ended May 23, 2022, we received one 

comment. 

Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast 

Guard finds that good cause exists for 

making this rule effective less than 30 

days after publication in the Federal 

Register. The comment period for the 

NPRM associated with the Falls Bridge 

in Blue Hill, ME, Bridge replacement 

project ended on May 23, 2022. The 

construction project is scheduled to 

begin on July 1, 2022. Thus, there is 

now insufficient time for a 30 day 

effective period before the need to 

enforce the safety zone on July 1, 2022. 

The Maine Department of 

Transportation has awarded the job to a 

contractor and work is ready to begin. 

Delaying the enforcement of this safety 

zone to allow a 30 day effective period 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 113 / Monday, June 13, 2022 / Rules and Regulations 35655 

will be impractical and contrary to the 

public interest because it would inhibit 

the Coast Guard’s ability to fulfill its 

mission to keep the ports and 

waterways safe. 

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule 

The Coast Guard is issuing this rule 

under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034 

(previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The 

Captain of the Port Northern New 

England (COTP) has determined that 

potential hazards associated with the 

bridge construction from July 1, 2022, 

through June 30, 2024, will be a safety 

concern for anyone within a 50-yard 

radius of the bridge. The purpose of this 

rule is to ensure safety of vessels and 

the navigable waters in the safety zone 

during bridge construction. 

IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, 

and the Rule 

As noted above, we received one 

comment on our NPRM published April 

22, 2022. The comment was in favor of 

the rule. There are no changes in the 

regulatory text of this rule from the 

proposed rule in the NPRM. 

This rule establishes a safety zone 

from July 1, 2022, through June 30, 

2024. The safety zone will cover all 

navigable waters within 50 yards of the 

Falls Bridge located in Blue Hill, Maine. 

The duration of the zone is intended to 

ensure the safety of vessels and these 

navigable waters during bridge 

replacement. No vessel or person will be 

permitted to enter the safety zone 

without obtaining permission from the 

COTP or a designated representative. 

V. Regulatory Analyses 

We developed this rule after 

considering numerous statutes and 

Executive orders related to rulemaking. 

Below we summarize our analyses 

based on a number of these statutes and 

Executive orders, and we discuss First 

Amendment rights of protestors. 

A. Regulatory Planning and Review 

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 

direct agencies to assess the costs and 

benefits of available regulatory 

alternatives and, if regulation is 

necessary, to select regulatory 

approaches that maximize net benefits. 

This rule has not been designated a 

‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under 

Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, 

this rule has not been reviewed by the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB). 

This regulatory action determination 

is based on the size and location of the 

safety zone. The safety zone would only 

impact a 50-yard radius from the center 

of the Falls Bridge in Blue Hill, ME. 

Local waterway use is normally 

recreational and public outreach 

performed by Maine Department of 

Transportation has not identified any 

commercial vessel use. Proper public 

notice of enforcement will be given 

through appropriate means, which may 

include, but are not limited to, 

publication in the Local Notice to 

Mariners and Broadcast Notice to 

Mariners via VHF–FM marine channel 

16. 

B. Impact on Small Entities 

The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 

1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, 

requires Federal agencies to consider 

the potential impact of regulations on 

small entities during rulemaking. The 

term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small 

businesses, not-for-profit organizations 

that are independently owned and 

operated and are not dominant in their 

fields, and governmental jurisdictions 

with populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard received no comments 

from the Small Business Administration 

on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard 

certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this 

rule will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities. 

While some owners or operators of 

vessels intending to transit the safety 

zone may be small entities, for the 

reasons stated in section V.A above, this 

rule will not have a significant 

economic impact on any vessel owner 

or operator. 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

we want to assist small entities in 

understanding this rule. If the rule 

would affect your small business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction and you have questions 

concerning its provisions or options for 

compliance, please call or email the 

person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

Small businesses may send comments 

on the actions of Federal employees 

who enforce, or otherwise determine 

compliance with, Federal regulations to 

the Small Business and Agriculture 

Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman 

and the Regional Small Business 

Regulatory Fairness Boards. The 

Ombudsman evaluates these actions 

annually and rates each agency’s 

responsiveness to small business. If you 

wish to comment on actions by 

employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– 

888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The 

Coast Guard will not retaliate against 

small entities that question or complain 

about this rule or any policy or action 

of the Coast Guard. 

C. Collection of Information 

This rule will not call for a new 

collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501–3520). 

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal 

Governments 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on the States, on the relationship 

between the National Government and 

the States, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government. We have 

analyzed this rule under that order and 

have determined that it is consistent 

with the fundamental federalism 

principles and preemption requirements 

described in Executive Order 13132. 

Also, this rule does not have tribal 

implications under Executive Order 

13175, Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments, 

because it does not have a substantial 

direct effect on one or more Indian 

tribes, on the relationship between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian tribes. 

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this rule 

will not result in such an expenditure, 

we do discuss the effects of this rule 

elsewhere in this preamble. 

F. Environment 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Department of Homeland Security 

Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated 

implementing instructions, and 

Environmental Planning COMDTINST 

5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast 

Guard in complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 

U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have 

determined that this action is one of a 

category of actions that do not 

individually or cumulatively have a 

significant effect on the human 

environment. This rule involves 

establishing a safety zone that would be 

enforced 24 hours a day from July 1, 

2022, through June 30, 2024, that would 

prohibit entry within a 50-yard radius 

from the center of the Falls Bridge in 

Blue Hill, ME. It is categorically 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
35656 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 113 / Monday, June 13, 2022 / Rules and Regulations 

excluded from further review under 

paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 

1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023–01– 

001–01, Rev. 1. A Record of 

Environmental Consideration 

supporting this determination is 

available in the docket. For instructions 

on locating the docket, see the 

ADDRESSES section of this preamble. 

G. Protest Activities 

The Coast Guard respects the First 

Amendment rights of protesters. 

Protesters are asked to call or email the 

person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

coordinate protest activities so that your 

message can be received without 

jeopardizing the safety or security of 

people, places or vessels. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 

CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 

1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; 

Department of Homeland Security Delegation 

No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.2. 

■ 2. Add § 165.T01–0134 to read as 

follows: 

§ 165.T01–0134 Safety Zone; Falls Bridge 

Project, Blue Hill, ME. 

(a) Locations. The following area is a 

safety zone: All navigable waters, from 

surface to bottom, within a 50-yard 

radius from the center of the Falls 

Bridge in Blue Hill, ME. 

(b) Definitions. As used in this 

section, designated representative 

means a Coast Guard Patrol 

Commander, including a Coast Guard 

coxswain, petty officer, or other officer 

operating a Coast Guard vessel and a 

Federal, State, and local officer 

designated by or assisting the Captain of 

the Port Northern New England (COTP) 

in the enforcement of the safety zone. 

(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general 

safety zone regulations in subpart C of 

this part, you may not enter the safety 

zone described in paragraph (a) of this 

section unless authorized by the COTP 

or the COTP’s designated representative. 

(2) To seek permission to enter, 

contact the COTP or the COTP’s 

representative via VHF–FM marine 

channel 16 or by contacting the Coast 

Guard Sector Northern New England 

Command Center at (207) 741–5465. 

Those in the safety zone must comply 

with all lawful orders or directions 

given to them by the COTP or the 

COTP’s designated representative. 

(d) Enforcement period. This section 

is effective from July 1, 2022, through 

June 30, 2024, and subject to 

enforcement 24 hours a day. The Coast 

Guard will use Broadcast Notice to 

Mariners and Local Notice to Mariners 

to notify the public of this safety zone. 

Dated: June 6, 2022. 

A.E. Florentino, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port Northern New England. 

[FR Doc. 2022–12615 Filed 6–10–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket Number USCG–2022–0163] 

RIN 1625–1625–AA00 

Safety Zone; Tall Ships Challenge 

Great Lakes 2022; Erie, PA, Cleveland, 

OH, and Two Harbors, MN 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Temporary final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will create 

safety zones around each tall ship 

visiting the Great Lakes during the Tall 

Ships Challenge 2022 race series. These 

safety zones will provide for the 

regulation of vessel traffic in the vicinity 

of each tall ship in the navigable waters 

of the United States. The Coast Guard is 

taking this action to safeguard 

participants and spectators from the 

hazards associated with the limited 

maneuverability of these tall ships and 

to ensure public safety during tall ships 

events. 

DATES: This rule is effective from 12:01 

a.m. June 24, 2022, until 12:01 a.m. on 

August 29, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: To view documents 

mentioned in this preamble as being 

available in the docket, go to https://

www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2022– 

0163 in the search box and click 

‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type 

column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related 

Material.’’ 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this rule, call or 

email LT Jason Radcliffe, 9th District 

Waterways Management, U.S. Coast 

Guard; telephone 216–902–6078, email 

jason.a.radcliffe2@uscg.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations 

CFR Code of Federal Regulations 

DHS Department of Homeland Security 

FR Federal Register 

NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking 

§ Section 

U.S.C. United States Code 

II. Background Information and 

Regulatory History 

During the Tall Ships Challenge Great 

Lakes 2022, tall ships will be 

participating in maritime parades, 

training cruises, races, and mooring in 

the harbors of Erie, PA, Cleveland, OH, 

and Two Harbors, MN. This is a triannual event that teaches character 

building and leadership through sail 

training. The Tall Ships event seeks to 

educate the public about both the 

historical aspects of sailing ships as well 

as their current use as training vessels 

for students. Tall ships are large, 

traditionally-rigged sailing vessels. The 

event will consist of festivals at each 

port of call, sail training cruises, tall 

ship parades, and races between the 

ports. More information regarding the 

Tall Ships Challenge 2022 and the 

participating vessels can be found at 

https://www.tallshipschallenge.com/. 

In response, on 1 April 2022 the Coast 

Guard published a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) titled Safety Zone; 

Tall Ships Challenge Great Lakes 2022; 

Erie, PA, Cleveland, OH, and Two 

Harbors, MN (87 FR 19039). There we 

stated why we issued the NPRM, and 

invited comments on our proposed 

regulatory action related to this Tall 

Ships event. During the comment period 

that ended 2 May 2022 we received 03 

comments from the public and 01 

internal comment, all of which voiced 

support for the proposed rule. 

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule 

The Coast Guard is proposing this 

rulemaking under authority in 46 U.S.C. 

70034; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 

and 160.5; DHS Delegation No. 0170.1. 

These safety zones are necessary to 

protect the tall ships from potential 

harm and to protect the public from the 

hazards associated with the limited 

maneuverability of tall sailing ships. 

When operating under sail, they require 

a substantial crew to manually turn the 

rudder and adjust the sails, therefore 

they cannot react as quickly as modern 

ships. Additionally, during parades of 

sail, the tall ships will be following a set 

course through a crowded harbor, and it 

is imperative that spectator craft stay 

clear since maneuvering the tall ships to 

avoid large crowds of spectator craft 

would not be possible. Due to the high 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES