alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.a

I, John P. Manning, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BCTC V Assignor Corp. (the "Assignor");
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Assignor as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The Assignor's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Assignor and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the Assignor, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the Assignor's disclosure controls and procedures  and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



1. The Assignor's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Assignor's auditors and the audit committee of the Assignor's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Assignor's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Assignor's internal control over financial reporting.



|August 14, 2007 | /s/ John P. Manning 
|--------------- | --------------------
|                | John P. Manning     
|                | Director, President 
|                | (Principal Executive
|                | Officer), BCTC V    
|                | Assignor Corp.
ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE, LLC, Petitioner v. COWPASTURE RIVER PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION, et al.

No. 18-1587

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 4, 2019

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The case is consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.
# C_2017029EN.01000901.xml

| 28.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 29/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 29/9

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/153, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/149, concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Tunisia

(2017/C 29/07)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/153 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/149 (4).

1

2

3

4

The Council of the European Union, after having reviewed the list of designated persons, has decided that the persons that appear in the above-mentioned Annexes should continue to be included in the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2011/72/CFSP and Regulation (EU) No 101/2011.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 101/2011, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council before 31 October 2017, together with supporting documentation that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered to the following address:

before 31 October 2017

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council’s next review, pursuant to Article 5 of Decision 2011/72/CFSP and Article 12(4) of Regulation (EU) No 101/2011, of the list of designated persons.

---

(1)  OJ L 28, 2.2.2011, p. 62.

1

(2)  OJ L 23, 28.1.2017, p. 19.

2

(3)  OJ L 31, 5.2.2011, p. 1.

3

(4)  OJ L 23, 28.1.2017, p. 1.

4

---
Larry Grant GENTRY, Petitioner, v. ARIZONA.

No. 19-8196.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 26, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One denied.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MediaNews Group, Inc. (the
"Company") for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald A. Mayo,
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the
            dates indicated and results of operations of the Company for the
            periods indicated.

                                    /s/ RONALD A. MAYO
                                        --------------
                                        Ronald A. Mayo
                                        Vice President and
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        September 26, 2003
Independent Auditors' Consent



To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Smith Barney Appreciation Fund Inc.:

We consent to the use of our report dated February 10, 1998 for the 
Smith Barney Appreciation Fund Inc. incorporated herein by reference 
and to the references to our Firm under the headings "Financial 
Highlights" in the Prospectuses and "Counsel and Auditors" in the 
Statement of Additional Information.




	KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


New York, New York
April 27, 1998
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018444EN.01002201.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 10.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 444/22 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9173 — Astorg Asset Management/Montagu Private Equity/Nemera Capital)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 444/10)

1.

On 29 November 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018444EN.01002201-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Astorg Asset Management (‘Astorg’, Luxembourg); |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Montagu Private Equity LLP (‘Montagu’, France); |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Nemera Capital (together with its subsidiaries, ‘Nemera Group’, France), currently solely controlled by Montagu. |

Astorg acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control over Nemera Group. As a result of the Transaction, Nemera Group will be jointly controlled by Astorg and Montagu.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Astorg: a private equity company;

—   for Montagu: a private equity company;

—   for Nemera Group: a manufacturer of plastic drugs delivery systems sold to the pharmaceutical, biotech and generic industries.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018444EN.01002201-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9173 — Astorg Asset Management/Montagu Private Equity/Nemera Capital

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax: +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018444EN.01002201-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018444EN.01002201-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 20 1 DB 2019 (No. 6 RST 2020)

:

KRISTINE YVONNE PEGNO : Attorney Registration No. 52727

:

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

FROM RETIRED STATUS : ( Out of State )

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23 rd day of January

, 2020 , the Report and Recommendation of

Disciplinary Board Member dated January 9 , 2020

, is approved and it is ORDERED that

Kristine Yvonne Pegno

, who has been on Retired Status

, has never been suspended or

disbarred, and has demonstrated that s he has the moral qualifications, competency and

learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is,

hereby reinstated to active status as a member of th e Bar of this Commonwealth. The

expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of this matter shall

be paid by the Petitioner.
JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES L.L.C., et al., Petitioners v. Rebekah GEE, Secretary, Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals

No. 18-1323

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 4, 2019

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The case is consolidated and a *36total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.
John DOE 1, et al., Petitioners, v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION.

No. 19M54.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 15, 2019.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

KERNELIUS MARQUIS SHEPHERD, SR. § 

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24cv46

FRANK SAUNDERS, ET AL. §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Kernelius Marquis, Shepherd, Sr., proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled lawsuit. 

This matter was referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and the

Amended Order for the Adoption of Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to the United States

Magistrate Judge for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition

of the case.

 Procedural Background

On May 28, 2024, the court entered an order directing plaintiff to pay an initial partial filing

fee. Plaintiff was given 30 days to comply with the court’s order and acknowledged receipt of the

order on June 6. The time for complying with the order has expired. However, plaintiff has not paid

the initial partial filing fee or otherwise contacted the court. 

Discussion

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) authorizes a district court to dismiss an action for

failure to prosecute or for failure to comply with any court order. Larson v. Scott, 157 F.3d 1030,

1031 (5th Cir. 1998). “This authority [under Rule 41(b)] flows from the court's inherent power to

control its docket and prevent undue delays in the disposition of pending cases.” Boudwin v.

Graystone Insurance Co., Ltd., 756 F.2d 399, 401 (5th Cir. 1985) (citing Link v. Wabash, R.R. Co.,

370 U.S. 626, 629 (1962)).

By failing to comply with the order described above, plaintiff has failed to diligently

prosecute this lawsuit. As a result, this case should be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Case 1:24-cv-00046-MAC-ZJH Document 5 Filed 07/19/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 14
Recommendation

This lawsuit should be dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution pursuant to

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Objections

Objections must be (1) specific, (2) in writing, and (3) served and filed within 14 days after

being served with a copy of this report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED.R.CIV. P. 6(a), 6(b) and 72(b).

A party’s failure to object bars that party from (1) entitlement to de novo review by a district

judge of proposed findings and recommendations, Rodriguez v. Bowen, 857 F.2d 275, 276-77 (5th

Cir. 1988), and (2) appellate review, except on grounds of plain error, of unobjected-to factual

findings and legal conclusions accepted by the district court, Douglass v. United Serv. Auto. Ass’n.,

79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

2

_________________________

Zack Hawthorn

United States Magistrate Judge SIGNED this 19th day of July, 2024.

Case 1:24-cv-00046-MAC-ZJH Document 5 Filed 07/19/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 15
Brandon Kyle THOMAS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5918

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# C_2018407EN.01000201.xml

| 12.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 407/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 407/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9075 — Continental/CITC/JHTD/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 407/03)

On 29 October 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9075. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9075. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Galen Lemar AMERSON, et al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR the DISTRICT OF COLORADO.

No. 18-9201

Supreme Court of the United States.

Nov. 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 12/09/14          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      361,415
COMMITMENTS
 120,208  146,767   98,443  120,203   85,374  338,854  330,584   22,561   30,831

CHANGES FROM 12/02/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -12,439)
  -5,113   -7,237   -5,396     -549      257  -11,058  -12,376   -1,381      -63

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    33.3     40.6     27.2     33.3     23.6     93.8     91.5      6.2      8.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      178)
      47       76       75       39       35      136      147
```

----

Updated December 12, 2014
Andrew S. HANGO, Petitioner v. William P. BARR, Attorney General

No. 18-9683

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 12, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
Billy Daniel RAULERSON, Jr., Petitioner, v. WARDEN.

No. 19-941.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
CERTIFICATE
                              
      The  undersigned, Controller of SMITH BARNEY
ADJUSTABLE RATE GOVERNMENT INCOME FUND (the "Trust"), hereby
certifies that the Trust has received  full payment, in
accordance  with  the provisions of its Prospectus, for
15,827,814 shares of  beneficial interest,  par  value
$0.001 per share, the sales  of  which are reported in the
Fund's Rule 24f-2 Notice covering the fiscal year ended May
31, 1997 and that the facts otherwise stated in such Notice
are true.


                                   Thomas M. Reynolds
                                   Controller

Dated:         July 11, 1997
Michelle Stopyra YANEY and Peter DeBellis, Petitioners, v. Rebecca MASON, et al.

No. 19-7937.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two denied.
Rickie Markiece ATKINSON, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5572

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Rehaif* v. *United States,* 588 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 2191, 204 L.Ed.2d 594 (2019).
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET-WTI - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                      Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/24/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      497,866
COMMITMENTS
  83,530   39,382  118,108  279,357  325,932  480,995  483,422   16,871   14,444

CHANGES FROM 06/17/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -31,317)
  -2,996    5,533  -22,691   -7,554  -17,080  -33,241  -34,238    1,924    2,921

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    16.8      7.9     23.7     56.1     65.5     96.6     97.1      3.4      2.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      144)
      40       31       57       68       63      136      125
```

----

Updated June 27, 2014
Paul SUAREZ, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5450

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES,

Plaintiff, 

v.

VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. et 

al., 

 Defendants, 

ERICSSON INC., NOKIA OF AMERICA 

CORPORATION, 

 Intervenors. 

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00470-JRG-RSP

(Lead Case)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00469-JRG-RSP

(Member Case)

ORDER

Before the Court is the Unopposed Motion for Leave to Intervene filed by Movant-Intervenor 

Ericsson Inc., Dkt. No. 18, and the Unopposed Motion for Leave to Intervene filed by MovantIntervenor Nokia of America Corporation, Dkt. No. 20. Both Motions were filed in Member Case 

No. 2:23-cv-469 prior to the order consolidating, 2:23-cv-469 Dkt. No. 25. 

Nokia and Ericsson moved to intervene pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a) or, 

in the alternative, pursuant to Rule 24(b). Having considered the Motions, their unopposed nature, 

and the relevant authorities, the Court finds that the Motions should be and hereby are GRANTED.

Accordingly, Nokia and Ericsson are permitted to intervene in member case 2:23-cv-469 and are 

GRANTED LEAVE to file responsive pleadings in intervention in the Lead Case. 

Case 2:23-cv-00470-JRG-RSP Document 29 Filed 12/17/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 877