alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of SeaBright Insurance Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Scott H. Maw, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:   May 10, 2010





/s/ Scott H. MawScott H. MawSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officerand Assistant Secretary





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to SeaBright Insurance Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by SeaBright Insurance Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
- 1 - 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES, LLC § 

 § CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00585-JRG-RSP 

v. § (Lead Case) 

 § 

ROCHE DIABETES CARE, LTD. §

 

DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES, LLC § 

 § CASE NO. 2:24-cv-00046-JRG-RSP 

v. § (Member Case) 

 § 

WONDERSHARE TECHNOLOGY § 

GROUP CO LTD. § 

 

DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES, LLC § 

 § CASE NO. 2:24-cv-00098-JRG-RSP 

v. § (Member Case) 

 § 

VIVINT, INC. § 

ORDER 

The above-captioned cases are hereby ORDERED to be CONSOLIDATED for all 

pretrial issues with the LEAD CASE, Case No. 2:23-cv-00585. All parties are instructed to file 

any future filings in the LEAD CASE. Individual cases remain active for trial. 

The Clerk is instructed to add the consolidated Defendants into the Lead Case and their 

corresponding Lead and Local Counsel only. Additional counsel may file a Notice of Appearance 

in the Lead Case if they wish to continue as counsel of record in the lead consolidated action. 

Counsel who has appeared pro hac vice in any member case may file a Notice of Appearance in 

the Lead Case without filing an additional application to appear pro hac vice in the Lead Case. 

Counsel who have not appeared in a member case at the point when it is consolidated into the Lead 

Case should file a Notice of Appearance only in the Lead Case, and such Notice should state the 

relevant member case. 

Case 2:24-cv-00098-JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 04/17/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 203
- 2 - 

____________________________________

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 17th day of April, 2024.

Case 2:24-cv-00098-JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 04/17/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 204
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 113 (Monday, June 13, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 35701]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12596]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

39 CFR Part 111


Parcels Prepared in Soft Packaging

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service is withdrawing the proposed rule that would 
have added new subsections to establish parcel selvage standards and to 
clarify how to measure parcels prepared in soft packaging.

DATES: The proposed rule published on March 24, 2022 (87 FR 16700), is 
withdrawn effective [immediately or June 13, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen F. Key at (202) 268-7492 or 
Garry Rodriguez at (202) 268-7281.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the proposed rule that was published in 
the Federal Register on March 24, 2022, the Postal Service proposed to 
implement a two-inch maximum of selvage on the length and the width of 
a parcel prepared in soft packaging and to provide a clarification 
defining how to measure parcels prepared in soft packaging to generally 
determine the length, width, and height of the mailpiece.
    In consideration of concerns expressed by members of the mailing 
community during the proposed rule comment period, the Postal Service 
has elected to withdraw the proposed rule.

Joshua J. Hofer,
Attorney, Ethics & Legal Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2022-12596 Filed 6-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```

```

----

Updated June 27, 2014
David MOREL, Jr., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5081

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
In Re Gary Ray BOWLES, petitioner.

No. 19-5682 (19A217).

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 22, 2019.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice THOMAS and by him referred to the Court denied. Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Clarence E. SCOTT, Jr., Petitioner, v. Steven JOHNSON, Administrator, New Jersey State Prison, et al.

No. 19-5266

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.b

I, Marc N. Teal, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund V L.P.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





|November 21, 2005 | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|----------------- | ---------------------------
|                  | Marc N. Teal               
|                  | Principal Financial Officer
|                  |
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Opinion Research Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John F. Short, Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |         |  |                                     
|----------------------- |  | ------- |  | ------------------------------------
|                        |  |        
|Date: November 14, 2005 |  | Signed: |  | /s/    JOHN F. SHORT                
|                        |  | Name:   |  | John F. Short                       
|                        |  | Title:  |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
**CC I**  **N THE S**  **UPREME C**  **OURT OF THE S**  **TATE OF M**  **ONTANA** DA 22
- 0229 S ISTER MARY J O M C D ONALD , L ORI MALONEY, F RITZ D AILY, B OB B ROWN , D OROTHY B RADLEY, V ERNON F INLEY, MAE NAN E LLINGSON ; AND THE

L EAGUE OF W OMEN VOTERS OF M ONTANA , Plaintiffs and Appellees , V . C HRISTI JACOBSEN , M ONTANA S ECRETARY OF S TATE , Defendant and Appellant . **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s unopposed motion for expedited briefing schedule, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following briefing schedule is adopted :

 Appellant shall file her Opening Brief by June 9
 Appellees shall file their Answer Brief by June 29
 Appellant shall file her Reply Brief by July 6 No extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 10 2022

06/10/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0229
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 02/18/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       45,919
COMMITMENTS
   2,524    5,218    2,175   41,103   38,189   45,802   45,582      117      337

CHANGES FROM 02/11/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -798)
    -583      433     -647      355     -881     -875   -1,095       77      297

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     5.5     11.4      4.7     89.5     83.2     99.7     99.3      0.3      0.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       41)
       5        7        6       21       19       29       29`

---

Updated February 21, 2014
Hakim MUHAMMAD, petitioner, v. Cedric TAYLOR, Warden.

No. 18-8949.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 23, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Jarrell WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5486

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Carol M. KAM, Petitioner v. John B. PEYTON, Jr.

No. 19-479

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 12, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Steven Talbert WILLIAMS, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 19-5405

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
William Eric TAYLOR, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5185

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Charlene Terry-Ann Walker ROSA, petitioner, v. FLORIDA, et al.

No. 18-9065.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 23, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11



                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                  FOR THREE MONTHS ENDED FOR         SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                            JUNE 30,                     JUNE 30,
                                      1998           1997           1998          1997
                                  -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------
<S>                               <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>        
Basic:

Net Income ...................    $14,996,144    $ 9,203,132    $28,310,506    $17,693,608
                                  ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========

Weighted average number of
shares of common stock
outstanding ..................     53,849,094     52,053,816     53,319,341     51,952,422

Net income per common
 share .......................    $      0.28    $      0.18    $      0.53    $      0.34
                                  ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========


Diluted:

Net Income ...................    $14,996,144    $ 9,203,132    $28,310,506    $17,693,608
                                  ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========

Weighted average number of
shares of common stock
outstanding ..................     53,849,094     52,053,816     53,319,341     51,952,422

Net effect of dilutive stock
options--based on the treasury
stock method using average
market price .................      7,271,377      5,602,964      7,558,875      5,584,759
                                  -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------

Total weighted average number
of shares of common stock and
common stock equivalents
outstanding ..................     61,120,471     57,656,780     60,878,216     57,537,181
                                  ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========

Net income per common
 share .......................    $      0.25    $      0.16    $      0.47    $      0.31
                                  ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of SeaBright Insurance Holdings,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, John G.
Pasqualetto, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: May 11, 2005

                                 /s/ John G. Pasqualetto
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 John G. Pasqualetto
                                 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to SeaBright Insurance Holdings, Inc.
and will be retained by SeaBright Insurance Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IA 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 28 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to limit 

the power of Congress to impose a tax on a failure to purchase goods 

or services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2013 

Mr. PALAZZO introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to limit the power of Congress to impose a tax 

on a failure to purchase goods or services. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 28 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘Congress shall make no law that imposes a tax on 

3 a failure to purchase goods or services.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Curtis Lee SHEPPARD, Jr., Petitioner v. TEXAS

Curtis Lee Sheppard, Jr., Petitioner v. Texas

No. 19-5664

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 21, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
Keith Stuart CUMBEE, Petitioner v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 19-5644

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 21, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.7

                     BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY FINANCE CORPORATION

                                OFFER TO EXCHANGE

        $500,000,000 PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF ITS 4.20% SENIOR NOTES DUE 2010
     UNCONDITIONALLY GUARANTEED BY BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC., WHICH HAVE BEEN
REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, FOR ANY AND ALL 4.20% SENIOR NOTES
         DUE 2010, UNCONDITIONALLY GUARANTEED BY BERKSHIRE HATHWAY INC.

Instructions from Beneficial Owner

   The undersigned acknowledge(s) receipt of your letter and the enclosed
Prospectus and the related Letter of Transmittal in connection with the offer by
the Company to exchange the Exchange Notes for Outstanding Notes.

   This will instruct you to tender the principal amount of Outstanding Notes
indicated below held by you for the account of the undersigned, upon the terms
and subject to the conditions set forth in the Prospectus and the related Letter
of Transmittal.

   The undersigned represents that (i) the Exchange Notes acquired pursuant to
the Exchange Offer are being obtained in the ordinary course of the
undersigned's business, (ii) the undersigned is not engaging, does not intend to
engage, and has no arrangement or understanding with any person to participate
in the distribution of such Exchange Notes, (iii) the undersigned is not an
"affiliate," as defined under Rule 405 of the Securities Act, of the Company and
(iv) the undersigned is not acting on behalf of any person or entity that could
not truthfully make these statements. If the undersigned is a broker-dealer, it
acknowledges that it will deliver a copy of the Prospectus in connection with
any resale of the Exchange Notes.

                                                       Sign Here

                                          -------------------------------------
                                                     Signatures(s)


<PAGE>


Securities which are to be tendered:

Tender all of the Outstanding Notes

   Aggregate Principal Amount*

[ ]   Outstanding Notes
                        ------------


-------------------------------------
      Name(s) (Please Print)

-------------------------------------
             Address

-------------------------------------
             Zip Code

-------------------------------------
   Area Code and Telephone No.


Dated:                  , 2004



* Unless otherwise indicated, it will be assumed that all of the Outstanding
Notes listed are to be tendered.
# C_2017232EN.01000601.xml

| 18.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/6

---

Notice for the attention of persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 and in Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya

(2017/C 232/08)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons and entities designated in Annexes II and IV to Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 (1) and in Annex III to Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44 (2) concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya.

1

2

The Council of the European Union, after having reviewed the list of persons and entities designated in the abovementioned Annexes, has determined that the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/137/CFSP (3) and in Council Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 (4) should continue to apply to those persons and entities.

3

4

The attention of the persons and entities concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex IV to Regulation (EU) 2016/44, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 8 of the Regulation).

The persons and entities concerned may submit a request to the Council before 15 May 2018, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the abovementioned list should be reconsidered. Any such request should be sent to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DGC 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DGC 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council’s periodic review, in accordance with Article 17(2) of Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 and Article 21(6) of Regulation (EU) 2016/44, of the list of designated persons and entities.

---

(1)  OJ L 206, 1.8.2015, p. 34.

1

(2)  OJ L 12, 19.1.2016, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 58, 3.3.2011, p. 53.

3

(4)  OJ L 58, 3.3.2011, p. 1.

4

---