alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                      |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                      |  |
| Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas | BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware |
| As Indenture Trustee                 | As Owner Trustee |
| Attn:  Michelle H.Y. Voon  | Attn: Robert Castle / Kristine Gullo |
| 100 Plaza One 6th Floor         | 301 Bellevue Parkway, 3rd Floor |
| Jersey City, NJ 07311                | Wilmington, DE 19809 |

|                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                                 |  |
| The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. | Ally Auto Assets LLC |
| Attn:  Alvin Courts                   | Ally Bank |
| 2 North LaSalle Street, Suite 700               | Attn:  Martha Tate |
| Chicago, IL  60602                    | 200 West Civic Center Drive |
|                                            | Sandy, UT 84070 |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| Re:    | Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2017-5 |
|   | Annual Statement as to Compliance |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| a. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period of January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018, and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under his supervision, and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| b. | To the best of his knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement throughout such period. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | Very truly yours, |
|   |   |
|   | /s/ David J. DeBrunner |   |
|   | David J. DeBrunner |
|   | Vice President, Controller & Chief Accounting Officer |
|   |   |
Gary KIRCHHOFF, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 19-1150.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# C_2018183EN.01000102.xml

| 29.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8764 — Sedgwick/Cunningham Lindsey)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 183/02)

On 12 April 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8764. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8764. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Michael J. LITTLES, Petitioner v. FLORIDA;

No. 18-9024

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
John PATERNO, Petitioner v. CITY OF NEW YORK, et al.

No. 19-437

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 12, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 14, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-50566 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DANIEL TARIN, also known as Daniel Tarin Corrales, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:04-CR-1522-ALL-DB

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Daniel Tarin raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
# C_2018002EN.01000202.xml

| 5.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 2/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 2/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8654 — CK Hutchison/TMA Holding/TMA Logistics)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 2/03)

On 20 December 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8654. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8654. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Jorge Antonio MILLAN-RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner v. William P. BARR, Attorney General.

No. 19-5787

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

*487Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 106 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 

2014, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2014 (Public 
2 

•HJ 106 EH 

1 Law 113–46) is amended by striking the date specified 

2 in section 106(3) and inserting ‘‘January 18, 2014’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 14, 

2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 106 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal 

year 2014, and for other purposes.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/26/14          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      414,365
COMMITMENTS
 144,034  167,542  108,808  137,909  103,720  390,751  380,070   23,614   34,295

CHANGES FROM 08/19/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -4,089)
   9,330   12,726   -8,402   -4,655  -13,168   -3,727   -8,844     -362    4,755

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    34.8     40.4     26.3     33.3     25.0     94.3     91.7      5.7      8.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      202)
      66       80       80       40       40      152      164
```

----

Updated August 29, 2014
Robert Wayne GILLMAN, Petitioner v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 19-6081

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
KOHLBERG VENTURES, LLC, Petitioner, v. Peter WOJCIE-CHOWSKI

No. 19-355

Supreme Court of the United States.

Nov. 12, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000888127
<NAME> SMITH BARNEY MUNICIPAL FUND, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                       58,858,173
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                      58,656,861
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,247,464
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                  69,546
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              59,973,871
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                       965,656
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                      159,044
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                          1,124,700
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                      0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                    60,065,298
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                        4,021,162
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                        4,021,162
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                       77,458
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                    (1,092,273)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                     (201,312)
<NET-ASSETS>                                58,849,171
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                                    0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                            3,678,018
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                                 557,735
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                      3,120,283
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                   (1,091,617)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                  (3,772,741)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                      (1,744,075)
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                    3,040,011
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                              0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                          0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                                  0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                     (4,784,086)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                        (2,814)
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                        (656)
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                          430,866
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                                557,735
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                        61,539,156
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                            15.82
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                   0.78
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                         (1.21)
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                              0.76
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                         0.00
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                              0.00
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                              14.63
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                   0.91



</TABLE>
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/05/14          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      409,891
COMMITMENTS
 122,438  156,976  115,286  145,580  105,997  383,304  378,259   26,587   31,632

CHANGES FROM 07/29/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -10,055)
 -11,413  -36,389   13,137  -12,709   10,716  -10,985  -12,536      930    2,481

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    29.9     38.3     28.1     35.5     25.9     93.5     92.3      6.5      7.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      187)
      65       65       84       41       40      152      154
```

----

Updated August 8, 2014
Quincy CHISOLM, Petitioner, v. MARYLAND.

No. 19-7973.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland denied.
IN RE Frank J. ASHLEY, Petitioner

No. 18-9671

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Jamall GIBSON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5747

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
DEKALB BANKSHARES, INC.


                                                                      Exhibit 32
                Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The  undersigned,  who is the chief  executive  officer and the chief  financial
officer of DeKalb  Bankshares,  Inc.,  hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge,  the  accompanying  Form 10-QSB of the issuer fully complies with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
and that information  contained in the report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.



Date:  August 10, 2004                /s/William C. Bochette, III
---------------------                    ---------------------------------------
                                         William C. Bochette, III
                                         Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                         Financial Officer
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 72 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Making continuing appropriations for veterans benefits for 

fiscal year 2014, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the following sums are hereby appropriated, out of 

4 any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, 

5 and out of applicable corporate or other revenues, 
2 

•HJ 72 EH 

1 receipts, and funds, for veterans benefits for fiscal year 

2 2014, and for other purposes, namely: 

3 SEC. 101. (a) Amounts are provided for entitlements 

4 and other mandatory payments whose budget authority 

5 was provided in the Military Construction and Veterans 

6 Affairs, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2013 

7 (division E of Public Law 113–6), to continue activities 

8 at the rate to maintain program levels under current law, 

9 under the authority and conditions provided in the appli10 cable appropriations Act for fiscal year 2013, to be contin11 ued through the date specified in section 103(3). 

12 (b) Notwithstanding section 103, obligations for man13 datory payments due on or about the first day of any 

14 month that begins after October 2013 but not later than 

15 30 days after the date specified in section 103(3) may con16 tinue to be made, and funds shall be available for such 

17 payments. 

18 SEC. 102. Amounts are provided for ‘‘Department of 

19 Veterans Affairs—Departmental Administration—Gen20 eral Operating Expenses, Veterans Benefits Administra21 tion’’ at a rate for operations of $2,455,490,000: Provided, 

22 That such amount shall be made available subject to the 

23 authority and conditions as provided under the Military 

24 Construction and Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies 

25 Appropriations Act, 2013 (division E of Public Law 113– 
3 

•HJ 72 EH 

1 6) and shall be available to the extent and in the manner 

2 that would be provided by such Act. 

3 SEC. 103. Unless otherwise provided for in this joint 

4 resolution or in the applicable appropriations Act for fiscal 

5 year 2014, appropriations and funds made available and 

6 authority granted pursuant to this joint resolution shall 

7 be available until whichever of the following first occurs: 

8 (1) the enactment into law of an appropriation for any 

9 project or activity provided for in this joint resolution; (2) 

10 the enactment into law of the applicable appropriations 

11 Act for fiscal year 2014 without any provision for such 

12 project or activity; or (3) December 15, 2013. 

13 SEC. 104. It is the sense of Congress that this joint 

14 resolution may also be referred to as the ‘‘Honoring Our 

15 Promise to America’s Veterans Act’’. 

16 This joint resolution may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans 

17 Benefits Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2014’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 3, 

2013. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 72 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Making continuing appropriations for veterans benefits for fiscal year 2014, and for other purposes.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT 

COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT 

OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION 

HEADWATER PARTNERS II LLC, 

Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant, 

vs. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

§

Case No. 2:24-cv-00015-JRG-RSP 

(Lead Case) 

Jury Trial Demanded 

T-MOBILE USA, INC. AND SPRINT LLC, 

Defendants and Counterclaimant-Plaintiffs. 

HEADWATER PARTNERS II LLC, 

Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant, 

vs. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

§ 

Case No. 2:24-cv-00016-JRG-RSP 

(Member Case) 

Jury Trial Demanded 

AT&T SERVICES, INC., AT&T MOBILITY 

LLC AND AT&T CORP., 

Defendants and Counterclaimant-Plaintiffs. 

HEADWATER PARTNERS II LLC, 

Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant, 

vs. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

§ 

Case No. 2:24-cv-00007-JRG-RSP 

Jury Trial Demanded 

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, D/B/A VERIZON 

WIRELESS, AND VERIZON CORPORATE 

SERVICES GROUP INC., 

Defendants and Counterclaimant-Plaintiffs. 

ORDER GRANTING NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION’S 

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO INTERVENE 

Before the Court is Intervenor Defendant Nokia of America Corporation’s (“Nokia”) 

Motion to Intervene, filed July 17, 2024. The Court has reviewed the Motion and is fully 

Case 2:24-cv-00007-JRG-RSP Document 48-2 Filed 07/17/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 502
advised in the premises. Nokia moved to intervene pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(a)(2) 

or, in the alternative, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(b). Having considered the motion 

and the relevant authorities, the Court finds that the Motion should be and hereby is 

GRANTED. Accordingly, Nokia is permitted to intervene in these actions. 

SIGNED this day of , 2024. 

Case 2:24-cv-00007-JRG-RSP Document 48-2 Filed 07/17/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 503
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Sandra Smith Brown, independent * From the 385th District Court

executrix of the Estate of R.J. Smith, Jr., of Midland County,

deceased, Trial Court No. CV56870.

Vs. No. 11-21-00019-CV * March 11, 2021

William Charles Underwood, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

Jan Ann Underwood Pinborough, and (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Rosanne Underwood Gerrard, Trotter, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

(Williams, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal 

should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The costs incurred by reason of this 

appeal are taxed against Sandra Smith Brown, independent executrix of the Estate 

of R.J. Smith, Jr., deceased.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Communications Commission [FR ID 91318]
 The following items were adopted and released by the Commission on June 6, 2022 and deleted from the list of items scheduled for consideration at the Wednesday, June 8, 2022, Open Meeting. These items were previously listed in the Commission's Sunshine Notice on Wednesday, June 1, 2022. 3
Media
Title: Preserving Local Radio Programming (MB Docket No. 03-185).
                             Summary: The Commission will consider a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking regarding a proposal to allow certain channel 6 low power television stations to continue to provide FM radio service as ancillary or supplementary service under specified conditions.5
Wireline Competition
Title: Affordable Connectivity Program Transparency Data Collection (WC Docket No. 21-450).
                             Summary: The Commission will consider a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking seeking comment on a statutorily mandated annual data collection relating to the price and subscription rates of internet service offerings received by households enrolled in the Affordable Connectivity Program from participating providers.
 Federal Communications Commission. Marlene Dortch, Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2022-12690 Filed 6-10-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Ronald Ray HORNER, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5157

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

PAUL ALEXANDER GARLAND , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 22

- 453

[ August 25, 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; William L. Roby , Judge; L.T. Case No. 56

- 2020

- CF

- 002361
A

.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Benjamin Eisenberg, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

M AY , D AM OORGIAN and G ERBER , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Urvashi BHAGAT, Petitioner v. Andrei IANCU, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office

No. 18-277

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

*424Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing denied.