alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET-WTI - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                      Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/27/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      497,822
COMMITMENTS
  85,739   21,764  133,737  261,256  326,190  480,732  481,691   17,090   16,131

CHANGES FROM 05/20/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     17,514)
   9,618   -3,029    8,404   -2,016   10,086   16,006   15,461    1,508    2,053

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    17.2      4.4     26.9     52.5     65.5     96.6     96.8      3.4      3.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      146)
      42       28       53       67       67      132      128
```

----

Updated May 30, 2014
IN RE Alexander GUICE, Petitioner.

No. 19-7550.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.
Marquise Travon DEDMON, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5976

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 21, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
233 F.2d 618

#### James A. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. John E. PETERS and Chester E. Strand, Appellees.

No. 14998.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 14, 1956.

Rehearing Denied June 8, 1956.

James A. Williams, Steilacoom, Wash., for appellant (in pro. per.). -

Hubert A. Gilbert, Fairbanks, Alaska, for appellees.

*304Before POPE and CHAMBERS, Circuit Judges, and BOLDT, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing appellant’s complaint “for failing to state á cause of action.” Williams’ complaint alleged that defendants Peters and Strand, when called to testify in a certain criminal prosecution against him, each gave false and perjured testimony against Williams, thus bringing about his conviction.

The defendant Strand moved for summary judgment. .To his order denying that motion,1 the coürt added the order dismissing the complaint, from which appeal is now sought. *

This court has frequently held that an order dismissing a complaint, without dismissing the action, is not an appealable order. Turnbull v. Cyr, 9 Cir., 184 F.2d 117; Blanco v. United States, 9 Cir., 184 F.2d 117.

Cases may be found in which an order dismissing a complaint has been held final where it is clear that the court completely determined plaintiff has no right of action and plaintiff, by appealing, and not seeking leave to amend, was deemed to have elected to stand on his complaint. Asher v. Ruppa, 7 Cir., 173 F.2d 10. And compare United States v. State of Arizona, 346 U.S. 907, 74 S.Ct. 239, 98 L.Ed. 405,-reversing this court’s decision at 9 Cir., 206 F.2d 159.

We think that a fair interpretation of the court’s order is that it was not regarded by the trial court as a final decision, as in Asher v. Ruppa, supra; this for the reason that at the same time the court was denying the motion for summary judgment. Hence-the order here involved was not appealable, and the appeal is dismissed.

1

 In Parker v. Title and Trust Co., 9 Cir., 233 F.2d 505, this court applied the general rule that a witness may not be sued for damages on account of his false statements.
Certificate of Amendment of Amended and Restated Certificate



 EXHIBIT 4.3 
  

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT 
 OF

 AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION 
 OF 
 MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. 
  
 Thomas C. Wilder, III and Bruce W. Feuchter certify that: 
  
 1. They are the duly elected and acting President and Chief Executive Officer, and Secretary, respectively, of MICRO
THERAPEUTICS, INC., a corporation organized and existing under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “Corporation”). 
  
 2. That by an action by unanimous written consent of the Board of Directors of the Corporation resolutions were duly adopted in accordance with Section
242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law setting forth a proposed amendment of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, declaring said amendment to be advisable and directing said amendment to be submitted to the
stockholders of the Corporation at a Special Meeting. The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as follows: 
  
 RESOLVED, that Article 4(A) of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation be amended to read, in its
entirety, as follows: 
  
 “ARTICLE 4 
  
 A. Classes of Stock. This Corporation is authorized to issue two
classes of stock to be designated, respectively, ‘Common Stock’ and ‘Preferred Stock.’ The total number of shares which the Corporation is authorized to issue is Seventy-Five Million (75,000,000) shares. Seventy Million
(70,000,000) shares shall be Common Stock, $.001 par value and Five Million (5,000,000) shares shall be Preferred Stock, $.001 par value.” 
  
 3. That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of the Board of Directors, a Special Meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation was duly called and held,
upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, at which meeting the necessary number of shares as required by statute were voted in favor of the amendment. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of Amendment
to be executed by Thomas C. Wilder, III, its President and Chief Executive Officer, and attested to by Bruce Feuchter, its Secretary, this 30th day of January, 2004. 
  

	
	
	 /s/ Thomas C. Wilder, III        

	

	 Thomas C. Wilder, III,
 President and Chief Executive Officer



  
 ATTEST: 
  
 /s/ Bruce Feuchter 


Bruce Feuchter, 
 Secretary
Consent of RSG Global Consulting Pty Ltd

To the Board of Directors of Eldorado Gold Corporation

I consent to:

1.

The incorporation by reference in this annual report on Form 40-F of March 30, 2007 for the year ended December 31, 2006, of the description of the reports titled:

a.

Tanjianshan Gold Project , China, Technical Report for Eldorado dated September 2005, and revised January 30, 2006;

b.

Tanjianshan Gold Project, Qinghai Province, China, Bankable Feasibility Study Report for Afcan dated April 2005;

2.

The information that forms the summary of the Reports and the description of certain mineral reserve estimates and other information pertaining to the Tanjianshan Gold Project and to the use of my name under this annual report as a named expert.

Dated as of the 29th day of March 2007

With best regards



[ex9912002.gif]

John Hearne

Principal Consultant - Mining Engineering





pl_PTAN21_Consent_070329.doc

RSG Global Consulting Pty Ltd (ACN 121 184 290) trading as RSG Global (ABN 14 121 184 290)

PERTH   l   JOHANNESBURG   =   ACCRA
Independent Auditors' Consent



To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of 
Smith Barney Telecommunications Trust:

We consent to the use of our report dated February 12, 1997 with respect to 
the Smith Barney Telecommunications Income Fund of Smith Barney 
Telecommunications Trust, incorporated herein by reference, and to the 
references to our Firm under the headings "Financial Highlights" in the 
Prospectus and "Counsel and Auditors" in the Statement of Additional 
Information.





	
   

	KPMG Peat Marwick LLP		

New York, New York	
April 25, 1997
Exhibit 10.2


**ADDENDUM**











WHEREAS,
Cabela’s Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (“Company”) and James W. Cabela
(“Executive”) have entered into that certain Executive Employment Agreement
effective the 1 st day of
January, 2004 (the “Agreement”); and




WHEREAS,
Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) has determined by mutual agreement
with Executive to increase the base salary of Executive by 3.75%.




NOW,
THEREFORE, the Board and the Executive hereby agree to the
following:




1.  Base
Salary . Section
3.1 of the Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following:







3.1 Base
Salary .
Executive shall receive a base salary of Two Hundred Fifty-Nine Thousand Three
Hundred and Seventy-Five Dollars ($259,375.00) per annum. Any reduction in base
salary shall be determined by mutual agreement between Executive and the Board
and must be reflected in an addendum to this Agreement. Any increase in base
salary shall be made by Board resolution and shall not require an addendum to
this Agreement.







2.  Effective
Date. This
Addendum shall be effective at the beginning of the pay period for the Company’s
April 7, 2005 payroll.





3.  Effective
Addendum . Except
as otherwise set forth herein, this Addendum does not supersede or amend the
Agreement, and nothing contained herein is intended to reduce, restrict or
otherwise affect any terms of the Agreement.





**CABELA’S
      INCORPORATED**By:
    /s/
      Ralph W. CastnerIts:
    Vice
      President
      and
      Chief Financial Officer**EXECUTIVE**/s/
      James W. CabelaJames
      W. Cabela


BACK TO FORM 10-Q
P. SWANEY, et al., Petitioners v. Hector LOPEZ

Unknown Swaney, et al., Petitioners v. Enrique Montijo

No. 18-1162

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

EARLENE JOHNSON,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent.

______________________ 

2014-3076

______________________ 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. CH-1221-11-0328-W-1.

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

O R D E R

Earlene Johnson moves for leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis. 

Upon consideration thereof,

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

The motion is granted. 

Case: 14-3076 Document: 7 Page: 1 Filed: 04/01/2014
2 JOHNSON v. DVA

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

Daniel E. O’Toole 

Clerk of Court

s24

Case: 14-3076 Document: 7 Page: 2 Filed: 04/01/2014
DEKALB BANKSHARES, INC.

                                                                      Exhibit 32
                Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The  undersigned,  who is the chief  executive  officer and the chief  financial
officer of DeKalb  Bankshares,  Inc.,  hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge,  the  accompanying  Form 10-QSB of the issuer fully complies with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
and that information  contained in the report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.




Date:  November 11, 2004           /s/  William C. Bochette, III
------------------------                -----------------------------------
                                        William C. Bochette, III
                                        Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                        Financial Officer
# U nit edSta tes C ou rt o f A pp eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it

No. 07-1240 DR. JOSÉ S. BELAVAL, INC., Plaintiff/Appellant, RIO GRANDE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER, INC.; CONCILIO DE SALUD

INTEGRAL DE LOIZA, INC. (CSILO),

Plaintiffs,

v. HON. ROSA PÉREZ-PERDOMO, Secretary, Department of Health of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Defendant/Appellee, COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; MICHAEL O. LEAVITT, Secretary, United States

Department of Health and Human Services,

Defendants.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this court issued on May 18, 2007 is amended as follows: On page 14, line 19, replace the words "Double costs" with the word "Costs."
Thomas David MCWATERS, Petitioner v. Charles L. RYAN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 19-5834

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 07/16/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       34,656
COMMITMENTS
   2,858    6,332    2,116   28,992   25,624   33,966   34,072      690      584

CHANGES FROM 07/09/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        513)
      -2    1,682     -356    1,747      221    1,389    1,547     -876   -1,034

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     8.2     18.3      6.1     83.7     73.9     98.0     98.3      2.0      1.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       41)
       9        7        5       20       19       31       29`

---

Updated July 19, 2013
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET-WTI - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                      Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/20/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      480,308
COMMITMENTS
  76,121   24,793  125,333  263,272  316,104  464,726  466,230   15,582   14,078

CHANGES FROM 05/13/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -18,903)
  -4,912   -7,312   11,223  -21,911  -19,738  -15,600  -15,827   -3,303   -3,076

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    15.8      5.2     26.1     54.8     65.8     96.8     97.1      3.2      2.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      145)
      39       31       51       68       64      133      122
```

----

Updated May 23, 2014
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 25 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 25

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   clarify the authority of Congress and the States to regulate the 
      expenditure of funds for political activity by corporations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2013

Ms. Edwards (for herself, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. Capuano, Mr. 
Cicilline, Ms. Esty, Mr. Grayson, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Himes, Mr. Huffman, 
Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Ms. Lee of 
  California, Mr. McDermott, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Meeks, Ms. Norton, Ms. 
   Pingree of Maine, Mr. Rush, Mr. Sarbanes, Ms. Slaughter, Mr. Van 
 Hollen, Mr. Waxman, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Markey, Ms. Shea-Porter, Ms. Hahn, 
   Ms. Bass, Mr. Welch, and Mrs. Davis of California) introduced the 
following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   clarify the authority of Congress and the States to regulate the 
      expenditure of funds for political activity by corporations.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Nothing in this Constitution shall prohibit Congress 
and the States from imposing content-neutral regulations and 
restrictions on the expenditure of funds for political activity by any 
corporation, limited liability company, or other corporate entity, 
including but not limited to contributions in support of, or in 
opposition to, a candidate for public office.
    ``Section 2. Nothing contained in this Article shall be construed 
to abridge the freedom of the press.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of G & L Realty Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David E. Hamer, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before

publication in the New York Reports.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

No. 101 SSM 2

The People &c.,

 Respondent,

 v.

Anthony C.,

 Appellant.

David J. Klem, for appellant.

Susan Gliner, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. 

The Appellate Division opinion does not suggest a misapprehension

- 1 -
- 2 - SSM 2

or misapplication of its authority to review Youthful Offender

adjudications for abuse of discretion (CPL 720.20 [1] [a]), or

under its broad interest-of-justice jurisdiction (see CPL 470.15

[6] [b]; People v Dawn Maria C., 67 NY2d 625, 627 [1986]). 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules,

order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges

Read, Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein and Fahey concur.

Decided March 31, 2015

- 2 -
IN RE Freya PEARSON, Petitioner

No. 18-9384

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Karen BISHOP, Petitioner, v. PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA.

No. 19-1030.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Florida, Palm Beach County denied.
EXHIBIT 4.7



 Exhibit 4.7 
  
 Amendment to 1987 Stock Option Plan 
  
 By way of a resolution adopted by (i) a majority of the Corporation’s board of directors (the “Board”) present at a meeting held on
February 22, 1995, at which a quorum of the Board was present and acted throughout such meeting, and (ii) a majority of the Corporation’s shareholders (the “Shareholders”) present, in person or by proxy, at the annual meeting of
Shareholders held on May 9, 1995, at which a quorum of the Shareholders was present and acted throughout such meeting, Article 3 of the Corporation’s 1987 Stock Option Plan was amended to read in its entirety as follows: 
  
 “3. Subject to the provisions of this Plan, the maximum aggregate number of shares which
may be optioned and sold under the Plan is 150,000 Shares. However, this number may be increased by the Board of Directors.” 
  

					
			
	 /s/    Stephen A. Johnsen
	 	 Dated:
	 	January 16, 2004
	
	 	 	 	

	Stephen A. Johnsen, Secretary
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 01/07/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       92,734
COMMITMENTS
  25,088    5,589    3,670   56,324   80,312   85,082   89,571    7,652    3,163

CHANGES FROM 12/31/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,379)
     874      109        1      490    2,450    1,365    2,560    1,014     -181

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    27.1      6.0      4.0     60.7     86.6     91.7     96.6      8.3      3.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       84)
      14        5        2       49       33       64       39
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 01/07/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      240,864
COMMITMENTS
  79,843   34,358      755  145,896  199,889  226,494  235,002   14,370    5,862

CHANGES FROM 12/31/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,231)
   3,441   -2,888     -765     -698    5,261    1,978    1,608      253      623

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    33.1     14.3      0.3     60.6     83.0     94.0     97.6      6.0      2.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      187)
      62       23       13       72       61      139       92
```

----

Updated January 10, 2014