alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BCTC V Assignor Corp. (the "registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer of registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|               |  |                            
|-------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:          |  |                            
|March 10, 2005 |  | /s/ John P. Manning        
|               |  |                            
|               |  | John P. Manning            
|               |  | Principal Executive Officer
|               |  |                            
|               |  |                            



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1653 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1653

  To approve a governing international fishery agreement between the 
               United States and the Russian Federation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 1999

  Mr. Young of Alaska (for himself, Mr. Saxton, and Mr. Faleomavaega) 
(all by request): introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                       the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To approve a governing international fishery agreement between the 
               United States and the Russian Federation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RUSSIAN FEDERATION FISHING AGREEMENT.

    Notwithstanding any provision of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery 
Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.), the governing 
international fishery agreement entered into between the Government of 
the United States and the Government of the Russian Federation, as 
contained in the message to Congress from the President of the United 
States dated January 20, 1999, is approved by the Congress and shall 
enter into force and effect with respect to the United States on the 
date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Charmar BROWN, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5754

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has deter mined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 95-10898 Summary Calendar

_____________________
In the Matter of: HAROLD W. SMITH, III,

Debtor,

----------------------------------------------

HAROLD W. SMITH, III, Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee.

________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

(4:94-CV-788-E)

________________________________________________ June 20, 1996

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and D E MOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Harold Smith asserts, pro se , that the district court erred in

dismis sing his appeal of the bankruptcy court's denial of his

request for judicial disqualification and in affirming its orders

granting the Government's motion to compel debtor to file tax

returns and denying debtor's motion to quash.2

Pursuant to F ED

. R. A PP

. P. 3(c), a notice of appeal must

"designate the judgment, order, or part thereof appe aled from".

Smith's notice of appeal to the district court designated only the

bankruptcy court's order of October 11, 1994, not its July 14,

1 994, order denying judicial disqualification. Because the

district court la cks subject-matter jurisdiction over orders not

designated in a timely notice of appeal, Cole v. Tuttle , 540 F.2d

206, 207 (5th Cir. 1976), Smith's appeal of the July 14, 1994,

order was properly dismissed.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in affirming

the orders compelling Smith to file tax returns and denying his

motion to qua sh, because the bankruptcy court had sufficient

authority pursuant to General Order 93-1 § 9(i), from the Local

Bankruptcy Rules of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the

Northern District of Texas, and the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C.

§105(a), to compel Smith to file those returns.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment is

AFFIRMED.
Andre THOMAS, Petitioner, v. William WOODS, Warden, et al.

No. 19-5548

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Michael WILSON, Petitioner, v. Shawn HATTON, Warden.

No. 19-5049

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Case 2:24-cv-00080-JRG Document 52-8 Filed 09/18/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1014
Case 2:24-cv-00080-JRG Document 52-8 Filed 09/18/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 1015
Case 2:24-cv-00080-JRG Document 52-8 Filed 09/18/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 1016
Anthony Jerome KEE, Petitioner, v. Rick RAEMISCH, et al.

No. 19M134.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 4, 2020

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Justin PANUS, Petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 19-5043

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 19 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.19
                                        Agreed to March 21, 2013        

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and thirteen

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR SOAP BOX DERBY RACES.

    (a) In General.--The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Association 
(in this resolution referred to as the ``sponsor'') shall be permitted 
to sponsor a public event, soap box derby races (in this resolution 
referred to as the ``event''), on the Capitol Grounds.
    (b) Date of Event.--The event shall be held on June 15, 2013, or on 
such other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate jointly designate.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board, the event shall be--
        (1) free of admission charge and open to the public; and
        (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The sponsor shall assume full 
responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all 
activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the 
sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, 
sound amplification devices, and other related structures and equipment 
as may be required for the event.

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

    The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board are 
authorized to make such additional arrangements as may be required to 
carry out the event.

SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
## **EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS REQUIRED BYSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof Steinway Musical Instruments, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter endedMarch 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Dana D. Messina, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.
|              | /s/  Dana D. Messina                  |   |
|--------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|         |                                  |
|         | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|         | (Principal Executive Officer)         |
|         |                                  |
|         |                                  |
| May 10, 2007 |                                  |

 

----
IA 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 38 

Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 12, 2013 

Mrs. WALORSKI introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution 

of the United States. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 38 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Total outlays for any fiscal year shall 

3 not exceed total receipts for that fiscal year, unless three4 fifths of the whole number of each House of Congress shall 

5 provide by law for a specific excess of outlays over receipts 

6 by a rollcall vote. 

7 ‘‘SECTION 2. The limit on the debt of the United 

8 States held by the public shall not be increased, unless 

9 three-fifths of the whole number of each House shall pro10 vide by law for such an increase by a rollcall vote. 

11 ‘‘SECTION 3. Prior to each fiscal year, the President 

12 shall transmit to the Congress a proposed budget for the 

13 United States Government for that fiscal year in which 

14 total outlays do not exceed total receipts. 

15 ‘‘SECTION 4. No bill to increase revenue shall become 

16 law unless approved by a majority of the whole number 

17 of each House by a rollcall vote. 

18 ‘‘SECTION 5. The Congress may waive the provisions 

19 of this article for any fiscal year in which a declaration 

20 of war is in effect. The provisions of this article may be 

21 waived for any fiscal year in which the United States is 

22 engaged in military conflict which causes an imminent and 

23 serious military threat to national security and is so de24 clared by a joint resolution, adopted by a majority of the 

25 whole number of each House, which becomes law. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HJ 38 IH 

1 ‘‘SECTION 6. The Congress shall enforce and imple2 ment this article by appropriate legislation, which may rely 

3 on estimates of outlays and receipts. 

4 ‘‘SECTION 7. Total receipts shall include all receipts 

5 of the United States Government except those derived 

6 from borrowing. Total outlays shall include all outlays of 

7 the United States Government except for those for repay8 ment of debt principal. 

9 ‘‘SECTION 8. This article shall take effect beginning 

10 with fiscal year 2016 or with the second fiscal year begin11 ning after its ratification, whichever is later.’’. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Doroteo ZAMBRANO-RUIZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5202

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
John S. BENCHICK, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5336

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
IA 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 53 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States regarding 

the effect of treaties, Executive orders, and agreements with other nations or groups of nations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 24, 2013 

Mr. CULBERSON (for himself, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of 

Texas, Mr. GOWDY, Mr. MULVANEY, and Mr. PRICE of Georgia) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States regarding the effect of treaties, Executive orders, 

and agreements with other nations or groups of nations. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 53 IH 

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

2 for ratification: 

3 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

4 ‘‘No treaty, Executive order, or any agreement with 

5 any nation or group of nations or any of the provisions 

6 of such agreements, shall be construed to diminish any 

7 of the rights or privileges guaranteed to citizens of the 

8 United States under the Constitution of the United States, 

9 and Federal law.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2019129EN.01007001.xml

| 5.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/70 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/70

---

P8_TA(2018)0045

EU-USA Bilateral Agreement on prudential measures regarding insurance and reinsurance ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 1 March 2018 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Bilateral Agreement between the European Union and the United States of America on prudential measures regarding insurance and reinsurance (08054/2017 — C8-0338/2017 — 2017/0075(NLE))

(Consent)

(2019/C 129/11)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (08054/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (08054/2017),

| — | having regard to the Bilateral Agreement between the European Union and the United States of America on prudential measures regarding insurance and reinsurance (08065/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Bilateral Agreement between the European Union and the United States of America on prudential measures regarding insurance and reinsurance (08065/2017),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 114 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0338/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 114 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0338/2017),

| — | having regard to Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of insurance and reinsurance (Solvency II) (1), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of insurance and reinsurance (Solvency II) (1),

| — | having regard to Rule 99(1) and (4) and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 99(1) and (4) and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A8-0008/2018), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A8-0008/2018),

| 1. | Gives its consent to conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the United States of America. |
| --- | --- |

2.

---

(1)  OJ L 335, 17.12.2009, p. 1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

JACK IN THE BOX INC.

 Defendant

CASE NO. 2:24-cv-00052-JRG-RSP

 (Lead Case)

ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

ZAXBY’S FRANCHISING LLC,

 Defendant

CASE NO. 2:24-cv-00056-JRG-RSP

 (Consolidated Case)

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE PROPOSES DOCKET 

CONTROL ORDER, PROPOSED DISCOVERY ORDER, AND PROPOSED 

PROTECTIVE ORDER

Plaintiff Analytical Technologies, LLC hereby files this unopposed motion for a seven-day 

extension of time for Plaintiff and Defendant Zaxby’s Franchising LLC to file their Proposed

Docket Control Order and Propose Discovery Order, from June 12, 2024 to June 19, 2024 and to 

file their Proposed Protective Order, from June 19, 2024 to June 26, 2024. 

This motion is not made for purposes of delay, will not prejudice any party, and, if granted, 

will not interfere with any other deadline in this case. The parties have been working together to 

Case 2:24-cv-00052-JRG-RSP Document 19 Filed 06/12/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 83
- 2 -

narrow the disputed issues in the Orders; and extending this deadline by an additional seven days 

will allow the parties to further reduce their disputed issues in an attempt to reach agreement on 

the issues therein. This is the parties’ first request for an extension of time to file their Docket 

Control Order, Discovery Order, and Protective Order. 

WHEREFORE, Defendants respectfully request the Court to grant their Unopposed 

Motion for a seven-day extension of time to file the parties’ Proposed Docket control Order and 

Proposed Discovery Order from June 12, 2024 to June 19, 2024 and to file their Proposed 

Protective Order, from June 19, 2024 to June 26, 2024.

DATED: June 12, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Randall Garteiser

Randall T. Garteiser

Texas Bar No. 24038912

rgarteiser@ghiplaw.com

Christopher A. Honea

Texas Bar No. 24059967

chonea@ghiplaw.com

M. Scott Fuller

Texas Bar No. 24036607

rgarteiser@ghiplaw.com

GARTEISER HONEA, PLLC

119 W. Ferguson Street

Tyler, Texas 75702

Telephone: (903) 705-7420

Facsimile: (903) 405-3999

Counsel for Plaintiff 

Case 2:24-cv-00052-JRG-RSP Document 19 Filed 06/12/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 84
- 3 -

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

Counsel for both parties conferred on June 12, 2024, and agree with the motion set forth.

/s/ Randall Garteiser

Randall T. Garteiser

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on June 12, 2024, the foregoing document was electronically 

filed with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system and all counsel of record will receive 

an electronic copy via the Court’s CM/ECF system.

/s/ Randall Garteiser

Randall T. Garteiser

Case 2:24-cv-00052-JRG-RSP Document 19 Filed 06/12/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 85
# C_2018345EN.01000101.xml

| 27.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 345/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 345/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8738 — Rhône-Zodiac/Fluidra)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 345/01)

On 27 June 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8738. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8738. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---