alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018037EN.01003101.xml

| 1.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/31

---

Corrigendum to Notice of initiation of an anti-subsidy proceeding concerning imports of biodiesel originating in Argentina

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 34 of 31 January 2018
  )

(2018/C 37/11)

On page 37, point 3(i):

for:

for:

| ‘(i) | government provision of goods or services for less than adequate remuneration, such as the provision of soybeans;’, |
| --- | --- |

‘(i)

government provision of goods or services for less than adequate remuneration, such as the provision of soybeans;’,

read:

read:

| ‘(i) | government provision of goods or services for less than adequate remuneration, such as the provision of soybeans and soybean oil;’. |
| --- | --- |

‘(i)

government provision of goods or services for less than adequate remuneration, such as the provision of soybeans and soybean oil;’.

---
James Ray CLARK, Petitioner, v. UNC HOSPITALS, et al.

No. 19-6872

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 31.a

I, John P. Manning, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BCTC V Assignor Corp. (the "Assignor");
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Assignor as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The Assignor's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Assignor and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the Assignor, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the Assignor's disclosure controls and procedures  and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



1. The Assignor's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Assignor's auditors and the audit committee of the Assignor's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Assignor's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Assignor's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  November 18, 2005 | /s/ John P. Manning 
|------------------------ | --------------------
|                         | John P. Manning     
|                         | Director, President 
|                         | (Principal Executive
|                         | Officer), BCTC V    
|                         | Assignor Corp.
# C_2018132EN.01000601.xml

| 13.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 132/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 132/6

---

Special Report No 8/2018

‘EU support for productive investments in businesses — greater focus on durability needed’

(2018/C 132/06)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 8/2018 ‘EU support for productive investments in businesses — greater focus on durability needed’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 22, 2019

No. 04-18-00129-CV

Stanton P. BELL, et al., 

Appellants/Cross-Appellees,

v.

CHESAPEAKE EXPLORATION, LLC,

Appellee/Cross-Appellant,

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CI22093

Honorable Cathleen M. Stryker, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

After reviewing the appellees/cross-appellants’ motion for extension of time to file 

motion for rehearing and plaintiff-appellants/cross-appellees’ response in opposition of the 

motion, the motion is GRANTED IN PART. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME 

WILL BE GRANTED. Appellees/cross-appellants’ motion of rehearing must be filed by April 

19, 2019.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of March, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 10.6




 


ADDENDUM
TO AGREEMENT


 


June
2, 2011


 


Attached to and forming a part of a certain
Agreement of Sale dated April 3, 2006 along with the subsequent Amendment to Agreement dated March 26, 2009 between Redwood Estates
Corp., a corporation to be formed Buyer and 2404 LLC, 1401 LLC, Mark Sykes, and Marcia Schmid, Sellers for the property
known as 38 lots on Redwood Avenue, Galloway, NJ and for the consideration of $1.00.


 


It is agreed by all parties
that:


 


	1.		Final Settlement is extended to on or before December 31, 2011 for Phase I only.



 


	2.		For consideration of extending this agreement the buyer agrees to release the remaining
deposit being held in escrow by Thomas B. Reynolds, Esquire in the amount of +/- $21,230.00.



 


	3.		The remaining escrow amount is non-refundable and will not apply against the purchase
price at settlement however seller’s do agree to pay $4.000.00 out of the deposit to Duffy. Doley and McManus at a mutually agreed
upon meeting with Mark Sykes, Vincent Simonelli and Peter Doley at Peter Daley’s office within 5 days of this executed agreement.
The purpose is to discuss the plan going forward, current status and the possible phasing of the project. Buy will pay Seller
back the $4.000.00 at Settlement.



 


	4.		The seller and buyer both agree to phase the project into 3 phases to streamline the
process and to reduce the construction financing for buyer.



 


All other terms and Conditions
of the original Agreement of Sale dated April 3, 2006 except for the amendment dated March 26, 2009 and changes made today shall
remain the same.


 


		
	Vincent Simonelli, President	2404 LLC & 1401 LLC
	Redwood Estates Corp.	Mark Sykes, Managing Member
	BUYER	of Both 
	 	 
	 	
	 	Mark Sykes, Individually 
	 	 
	 	
	 	Marcia Schmid, Executrix
	 	Estate of Albert H. Benner
**EXHIBIT 10.4****SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**          SECOND AMENDMENT dated as of July 29, 2005 (this “Amendment”) to EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT dated asof August 16, 2004, as amended (the “Agreement”) by and between TRW Automotive Inc. (the “Company”)and Neil E. Marchuk (“Executive”).          WHEREAS, in order to extend the term of the Agreement, Executive and Company desire to amendthe Agreement as set forth below;          In consideration of the premises and mutual covenants herein, the parties agree as follows:          1. Defined Terms. Capitalized terms used herein but not defined shall have themeanings assigned to them in the Agreement.          2. Amendment to Section 1.b. of the Agreement. Section 1.b. of the Agreement shall beamended in its entirety to read as follows:b. Subject to the provisions of Section 7 of this Agreement, Executive shallbe employed by the Company for a period commencing on the Effective Date andending on December 31, 2008 (the “Employment Term”) on the terms and subjectto the conditions set forth in this Agreement; provided, however,that commencing with January 1, 2009 and on each January 1 thereafter (eachan “Extension Date”), the Employment Term shall be automatically extendedfor an additional one-year period, unless the Company or Executive providesthe other party hereto 60 days prior written notice before the nextExtension Date that the Employment Term shall not be so extended.          3. No Other Amendments; Effectiveness. Except as set forth in this Amendment, theAgreement is ratified and confirmed in all respects. This Amendment shall be effective as of thedate hereof.          4. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordancewith the laws of the State of New York, without regard to conflicts of laws principles thereof.          5. Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall bean original, with the same effect as if the signatures thereto and hereto were upon the sameinstrument.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Agreement as of the day andyear first above written.   TRW Automotive Inc. Neil E. Marchuk   /s/ David L. Bialosky /s/ Neil E. Marchuk   By: David L. BialoskyTitle: Executive Vice President
INTEL CORPORATION INVESTMENT POLICY COMMITTEE, et al., Petitioners v. Christopher M. SULYMA.

No. 18-1116

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 12, 2019

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 111 (Thursday, June 9, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35281-35282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12354]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice of Intent To Rule on Request To Change 1.2 Acres of 
Airport Land in the Existing Business Park From Aeronautical to Non-
Aeronautical Use at Martha's Vineyard Airport, West Tisbury, MA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Request for public comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is being given that the FAA is considering a request 
from the County of Dukes to change 1.2 acres of land from Aeronautical 
Use to Non-Aeronautical Use in the existing Airport Business Park at 
Martha's Vineyard Airport, West Tisbury, MA. The two parcels are being 
used for non-aeronautical development in the Airport Business Park. The 
Airport Business Park was established over twenty years ago and 
supports the revenue stream for the airport. The land lease proceeds 
will be deposited in the airport's operation and maintenance account.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 6, 2022.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments using any of the following methods:
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov, and follow

[[Page 35282]]

the instructions on providing comments.
    <bullet> Fax: 202-493-2251.
    <bullet> Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building, Ground Floor, Room W 12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
    <bullet> Hand Delivery: Deliver to mail address above between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Interested persons may inspect the request and supporting documents 
by contacting the FAA at the address listed under FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jorge E. Panteli, Compliance and 
Land Use Specialist, Federal Aviation Administration New England Region 
Airports Division, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, Massachusetts, 
01803. Telephone: 781-238-7618.
    Authority: 49 U.S.C 47107(h)(2).

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts on June 3, 2022.
Julie Seltsam-Wilps,
Deputy Director, ANE-600.
[FR Doc. 2022-12354 Filed 6-8-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Mary RYAN, Petitioner v. Robert J. CONNELLY, III, et al.

No. 19-5745

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Rhode Island denied.
Nelson , a Peoples Bank employee, died in October 1994. Appellants neve r 1 filed a motion for substitution of another party or a ppealed the dismissal of their claims asserted against him. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-1771

___________ Bobbie James; Billie J. Denton, * * Plaintiffs - Appellants, * * Appeal from the United v. * States District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas. Peoples Bank and Trust Company * of Mountain Home; Lula Mae * [UNPUBLISHED] Willmer; Neil Nelson, * * Defendants - Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: August 19, 1997 Filed: September 26, 1997

___________ Before FAGG, BOWMAN and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. In June 1994, Bobbie James and Billie J. Denton filed this diversity actio n against Peoples Bank and Trust Company (Peoples Bank) and two of its employees, Lula Mae Willm

er and Neil Nelson, asserting breaches of fiduciary duties and fraud. 1The Honorable H. Franklin Waters, United States District Judge for t he Western 2 District of Arkansas. -2- The dis trict court concluded James and Denton's claims were barred by Arkansas ' 2 statute of limitations and granted summary judgment in favor of Peoples Bank an d Willmer. We affirm. According to James and Denton's allegations, their father, Wylo M. Dyer , cre atedan irrevocable trust that provided for the termination and distribution of th e trust's corpus and income upon his death. Dyer died in 1982. Nelson had been th e trustee u ntil May 1985, at which time Peoples Bank became the successor trustee
. Willmer began tending for James and Denton's mother, Elsie Dyer, in 1988. James and Denton raise three claims: 1) Nelson and Peoples Bank breached their fiduc iary duties as trustees by failing to terminate the trust and distribute the trus t corpus upon Dyer's death; 2) Willmer exerted undue influence on their mother, Elsie M. Dyer, to make a new will in November 1988 and add Willmer as a beneficiary, and that Willmer withdrew $56,000 from Elsie Dyer's accou nt after fraudulently adding her name to Elsi e Dyer's checking account and safe deposit box; and 3) Peoples Ban k breached its fiduciary duty as personal representative of Elsie Dyer's estate by failing to monitor Wi llmer and filing to protect and recover Elsie Dyer's assets. James an d Denton also contend that the limitations period should be tolled. We conclude that the dis trict court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of Peoples Bank and Willmer since the suit was not timely filed. See Alexander v. Fl ake , 910 S.W.2d 190, 191 (Ark. 1995) (standard for summary judgment unde r Arkansas law). The applicable statute of limitations is three years. The plaintiffs filed th eir claims in 1994, more than three years after any of their causes of action arose
. James and Denton also have not shown that the limitations period was tolled or that Peoples Bank and Willmer should be estopped from pleading a limitations defense.-3-

Finally, the motion to strike made by Peoples Bank is denied as moot. Accordingly, we affirm. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Sobhy Fahmy Amin ISKANDER, Petitioner, v. Dean BORDERS, Warden.

No. 19-5494.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-30909) and on Forms S-8 (No. 33-77882, No.
33-77884, No. 33-77888, and No. 333-21333), of DT Industries, Inc., of our
report dated August 22, 2002, appearing in this Form 10-K.  We also consent
to the incorporation by reference of our report on the Financial Statement
Schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
St. Louis, Missouri
October 3, 2002
**
Exhibit 35.1 

Servicer Compliance Statement of Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation 

**NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

The undersigned, Kevin J. Cullum, President and Chief Executive Officer of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the“Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such corporate officer, as follows: 

(1) The undersigned has caused a reviewof the activities of the Company, in its capacity as Servicer, during the 12-month period ended March 31, 2020 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to the Sale and ServicingAgreement, dated as of December 13, 2017 (the “Agreement”), by and among the Company, individually and as servicer, Nissan Auto Receivables Corporation II, as seller, and Nissan Auto Receivables2017-C Owner Trust, to be conducted under his supervision; and 

(2) To the best of theundersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB forpublicly-issued asset-backed securities. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 26th day of June, 2020. 

 

/s/ Kevin J. Cullum
Kevin J. CullumPresident and Chief Executive Officer**
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 11/18/14          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      385,463
COMMITMENTS
 112,431  125,246  117,105  134,029  111,656  363,565  354,007   21,898   31,456

CHANGES FROM 11/11/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -7,471)
  -4,126   -1,241   -1,976    1,945   -7,595   -4,157  -10,812   -3,314    3,341

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    29.2     32.5     30.4     34.8     29.0     94.3     91.8      5.7      8.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      188)
      46       81       79       42       38      146      154
```

----

Updated November 21, 2014
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2215 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2215

          To suspend temporarily the duty on the chemical EBP.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 15, 1999

  Ms. Kaptur introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on the chemical EBP.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.32.52      2-Ethyl-2-butyl-    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/
                         1,3-propanediol                                                    31/2003          ''.
                         (EBP) (provided
                         for in subheading
                         2905.39.10)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the date that is 15 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Jose Manuel AGUIRRE-GANCEDA, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6115

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 12, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Casey Rafael TYLER, Petitioner, v. Erik A. HOOKS, Warden.

No. 19-8127.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
GPI DISTRIBUTORS, INC., Petitioner, v. NORTHEAST OHIO REGIONAL SEWER DISTRICT.

No. 19-857.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Cuyahoga County denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of G & L Realty Corp. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David E. Hamer, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ David E. HamerDavid E. Hamer Chief Accounting Officer May 15, 2006
Karen Sue WILSON, Petitioner v. MARION POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al.

No. 19-5637

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 21, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.