alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018165EN.01000102.xml

| 14.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8820 — GE/Rosneft/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 165/02)

On 4 April 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8820. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8820. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Walter Lee BROWN, Petitioner, v. James DEAL, Warden.

No. 19-5418

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
IN RE Adib Eddie Ramez MAKDESSI, Petitioner.

No. 19-6251

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 14 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 14

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States waiving 
  the application of the first article of amendment to the political 
speech of corporations and other business organizations with respect to 
   the disbursement of funds in connection with public elections and 
   granting Congress and the States the power to establish limits on 
     contributions and expenditures in elections for public office.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2013

    Ms. Kaptur introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States waiving 
  the application of the first article of amendment to the political 
speech of corporations and other business organizations with respect to 
   the disbursement of funds in connection with public elections and 
   granting Congress and the States the power to establish limits on 
     contributions and expenditures in elections for public office.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The first article of amendment does not apply to the 
political speech of any corporation, partnership, business trust, 
association, or other business organization with respect to the making 
of contributions, expenditures, or other disbursements of funds in 
connection with public elections.
    ``Section 2. Congress shall have power to set limits on the amount 
of contributions that may be accepted by, and the amount of 
expenditures that may be made by, in support of, or in opposition to, a 
candidate for nomination for election to, or for election to, Federal 
office.
    ``Section 3. A State shall have power to set limits on the amount 
of contributions that may be accepted by, and the amount of 
expenditures that may be made by, in support of, or in opposition to, a 
candidate for nomination for election to, or for election to, State or 
local office.
    ``Section 4. Congress shall have power to implement and enforce 
this article by appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 33.2**

 

**MANAGEMENT’S ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

Management of the Agency and Trust division of Citibank, N.A. (or “Company”) is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

Management has determined that the servicing criteria in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB are applicable in regard to the servicing platform as of and for the period as follows:

 

Platform:  Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) equipment loan-backed securities issued by CNH Equipment Trust, as listed in Appendix A, for which the Company provides trustee and paying agent services (the “Platform”).

 

Applicable Servicing Criteria:  All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d), to the extent required by Item 1122(d) servicing criteria in regards to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform, except for the following servicing criteria: 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(v), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities the Company performs with respect to the Platform (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”).  With respect to the Platform, servicing criterion 1122(d)(3)(ii) is applicable only as it relates to remittances.

 

Period:  Twelve months ended December 31, 2018 (the “Period”).

 

With respect to the Platform as of and for the Period, the Company’s management provides the following assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

 

·                  The Company’s management is responsible for assessing the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

 

·                  The Company’s management has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.  In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.

 

·                  Based on such assessment, the Company has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

 

KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to management’s assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.

 
|   | **CITIBANK,   N.A.** |
|--------|----------------------|
|   |                 |   |
|   | By:                  | /s/ Karen   Montbach |
|   |                 |   |
|   | Its:                 | Managing   Director |

 

Dated: February 15, 2019

 

----

 

**Appendix A**

 

CNH Transactions and Securities Constituting the Platform

 

**DEAL NAME**

CNH Equipment Trust 2014-C

CNH Equipment Trust 2015-C

CNH Equipment Trust 2016-A

CNH Equipment Trust 2016-C

CNH Equipment Trust 2017-A

CNH Equipment Trust 2017-C

CNH Equipment Trust 2018-A

CNH Equipment Trust 2018-B

 

----
Dan PIZARRO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES

No. 18-9789

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 81 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.81
                                     Agreed to February 12, 2014        

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill, S. 25, the Secretary of the Senate 
shall amend the title so as to read: ``To ensure that the reduced 
annual cost-of-living adjustment to the retired pay of members and 
former members of the Armed Forces under the age of 62 required by the 
Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 will not apply to members or former 
members who first became members prior to January 1, 2014, and for 
other purposes.''.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
John FRITZ, et ux., Petitioners, v. WASHOE COUNTY, NEVADA.

No. 19-1175.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 4, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nevada denied.
IN RE Phillip LOVE, Petitioner

No. 18-9575

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Brian Mark BURMASTER, Petitioner v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY.

No. 18-1502

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted), Dr. Ramon Harel, Chief Executive Officer of Scanvec-Amiable, Ltd. (the
"Company"), hereby certifies that:

1.   The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December
     31, 2003 (the "Periodic Report"), which this Certification accompanies,
     fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of
     the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the
     period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the
     Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.


Dated: March 30, 2004                                   /s/ Dr. Ramon Harel
                                                        -----------------------
                                                        Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ex. rel. [UNDER SEAL]

Plaintiff / Relator

v.

[UNDER SEAL]

Defendant,

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No.: 4:23-cv-363

FILED UNDER SEAL

PURSUANT TO

31 U.S.C. §§ 3730(b)(2)

AND COURT ORDER

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

RELATOR’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:

COMES NOW Relator Samantha Spears, Relator herein, by and through her attorneys of 

record, and files this Notice of Voluntary Dismissal and would show that Relator Samantha Spears 

no longer wishes to pursue her claims against Stride, Inc., K12 Texas Management Inc., Marcus 

Walker, LarKaya D. Gant, and Amanda Burdick. 

WHEREFORE, Relator Samantha Spears files this notice dismissing all remaining matters 

prayed in this case against Stride, Inc., K12 Texas Management Inc., Marcus Walker, LarKaya D. 

Gant, and Amanda Burdick and request that those claims be dismissed without prejudice to the 

United States. All costs will be paid by the party incurring same.

Case 4:23-cv-00363-SDJ Document 4 Filed 07/25/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 20
Respectfully submitted,

ELLZEY & ASSOCIATES, PLLC

By: /s/ Jarrett L. Ellzey

Jarrett L. Ellzey

Texas Bar No. 24040864

Leigh Montgomery 

Texas Bar No. 24052214 

Alexander G. Kykta

Texas Bar No. 24107841

1105 Milford Street

Houston, Texas 77066

Telephone: (713) 554-2377

Facsimile: (888) 276-3455

jarrett@ellzeylaw.com

leigh@ellzeylaw.com

alex@ellzeylaw.com

ATTORNEYS FOR RELATOR

Case 4:23-cv-00363-SDJ Document 4 Filed 07/25/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 21
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Jarrett L. Ellzey, certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been served on 

counsel for all parties via the Court’s CM/ECF system this the 21st day of July 2023. 

Additionally, the following parties were served via CMRRR: 

Hon. Damien M. Diggs

U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Texas 

550 Fannin, Suite 1250

Beaumont, Texas 77701

 /s/ Jarrett L. Ellzey

Jarrett L. Ellzey

Case 4:23-cv-00363-SDJ Document 4 Filed 07/25/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 22
Ernesto Salgado MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. David SHINN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections.

No. 19-7627.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Jerry PEREZ, Jr., Petitioner v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 19-5826

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATION AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000911583
<NAME> STEINWAY MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-02-1999
<CASH>                                           3,928
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   91,514
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,211
<INVENTORY>                                     96,507
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               193,872
<PP&E>                                         115,495
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,118
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 330,859
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,149
<BONDS>                                        144,593
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                     101,614
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   330,859
<SALES>                                        232,001
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               232,001
<CGS>                                          157,797
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,029
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,991
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   157
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,989
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,038
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,815
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,223
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,223
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.42


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUFKIN DIVISION

TERRELL JUSTIN ROGERS §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23cv159 

RHONDA MICHELE WINEBRENNER §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Terrell Justin Rogers, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled civil rights lawsuit. This

matter was referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636

and the Amended Order for the Adoption of Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to the United

States Magistrate Judge for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the

disposition of the case.

Discussion

The court previously sent plaintiff a Notice of Case Assignment Form. The form was sent

to plaintiff at the United States Penitentiary in McCreary, Kentucky, the address provided to the

court by plaintiff. The copy of the form sent to plaintiff was returned to the court as undeliverable,

indicating plaintiff was no longer at the address provided to the court. Plaintiff has not supplied the

court with a new address or otherwise contacted the court.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) authorizes the district court to dismiss an action for

want of prosecution sua sponte whenever necessary to achieve the orderly and expeditious

disposition of cases. Anthony v. Marion County General Hospital, 617 F.2d 1164, 1167 (5th Cir.

1980). See also McCullough v. Lynaugh, 835 F.2d 1126 (5th Cir. 1988). Eastern District of Texas

Local Rule CV-11(d) requires pro se litigants such as plaintiff to provide the court with a physical

address and keep the clerk advised in writing of a current address.

By not providing the court with his correct address, plaintiff has prevented the court from

communicating with him and moving this case towards resolution. He has therefore failed to

Case 9:23-cv-00159-MAC-ZJH Document 3 Filed 09/27/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 6
diligently prosecute this case and, as a result, this case should be dismissed without prejudice for

want of prosecution.

Recommendation

This case should be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

41(b).

Objections

Within 14 days after receipt of the magistrate judge’s report, any party may serve and file

written objections to the findings of facts, conclusions of law and recommendations of the magistrate

judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C).

Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings of facts, conclusions of law and

recommendations contained within this report within 14 days after service shall bar an aggrieved

party from de novo review by the district court of the proposed findings, conclusions and

recommendations and from appellate review of factual findings and legal conclusions accepted by

the district court except on grounds of plain error. Douglass v. United Services Automobile

Association, 79 F.3d 1415, 1429 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. CIV. P.

72.

2

_________________________

Zack Hawthorn

United States Magistrate Judge SIGNED this 27th day of September, 2023.

Case 9:23-cv-00159-MAC-ZJH Document 3 Filed 09/27/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 7
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATIONS
 I, W. Anderson Geater, Jr., certify that:
 1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Origen Financial, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)), and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(g)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
   /s/ W. Anderson Geater, Jr.
    
    Dated: November 10, 2008W. Anderson Geater, Jr.,Chief Financial Officer of Origen Financial, Inc.
Exhibit 99.02

                                                             Company's Form 10-Q
                                                             September 30, 1994

                                                             Page 16

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

     Two purported class actions were filed in October 1994 against Greyhound
Bus Lines, Inc. ("Greyhound"), various of its officers and directors and SBI and
one of its managing directors, in the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Texas. The plaintiffs purport to represent purchasers of
senior notes, subordinated covertible debentures and common stock of Greyhound.
SBI was lead manager or co-lead manager on the underwritng of certain of these
securities. The actions allege, among other things, that the prospectuses and
other public statements contained inaccurate statements relating to Greyhound's
financial prospects. The plaintiffs are seeking money damages in an unspecified
amount. The Company is reviewing the allegations, believes that it has
meritorious defenses and intends to vigorously defend against these actions.

<PAGE>

                                                             Company's Form 10-K
                                                             December 31, 1995

                                                             Page 10

     For information concerning two purported class actions filed in October
1994 in connection with certain public offering documents of Greyhound Bus
Lines, Inc., see the description that appears in the second paragraph of page 16
of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30, 1994, which description is incorporated by reference herein. A copy of the
pertinent paragraph is included as an exhibit to this Form 10-K. An amended
complaint was filed in July 1995, and the defendants filed a motion to dismiss
in September 1995. A motion to certify this matter as a class action was filed
in January 1996.