alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018245EN.01000701.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 13.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/7 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.8666 — Uralchem/Uralkali)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 245/06)

1.

On 6 July 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 and following a referral pursuant to Article 4(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018245EN.01000701-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Joint Stock Company United Chemical Company Uralchem (‘Uralchem’) (Russia), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Public Joint Stock Company Uralkali (‘Uralkali’) (Russia). |

Uralchem acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Uralkali.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for undertaking Uralchem: production and distribution of mineral fertilizers.

—   for undertaking Uralkali: production and distribution of potash as well as related/derivative potassium salts.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018245EN.01000701-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.8666 — Uralchem/Uralkali

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| E-mail: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 229-64301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018245EN.01000701-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018245EN.01000701-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/18/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       66,778
COMMITMENTS
   1,566    8,097    2,311   62,871   56,129   66,748   66,537       30      241

CHANGES FROM 03/11/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     12,171)
     -16      402      250   11,937   11,519   12,171   12,171        0        0

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     2.3     12.1      3.5     94.1     84.1    100.0     99.6      0.0      0.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       38)
       4        7        6       19       20       26       31`

---

Updated March 21, 2014
```

```

----

Updated May 23, 2014
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 9 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 9

To permit the Senate to avoid unnecessary delay and vote on matters for 
                     which floor debate has ceased.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 5, 2011

   Mr. Lautenberg (for himself, Mr. Durbin, Mrs. Gillibrand, and Mr. 
Menendez) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                 Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To permit the Senate to avoid unnecessary delay and vote on matters for 
                     which floor debate has ceased.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO THE STANDING RULES OF THE SENATE.

    Paragraph 2 of rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate is 
amended by--
            (1) inserting after the second undesignated subparagraph 
        the following:
    ``Following the filing of the cloture motion and prior to the 
cloture vote, as long as the matter on which cloture has been filed 
remains the pending matter--
            ``(1) there shall be no dilatory motion, including dilatory 
        quorum calls, in order; and
            ``(2) if, at any time, no Senator seeks recognition on the 
        floor, it shall be in order for the Majority Leader to put the 
        question on cloture as long as any applicable filing deadline 
        for first degree amendments has passed.''; and
            (2) inserting after the fifth undesignated subparagraph 
        (after the amendment by paragraph (1)) the following:
    ``If, at any time after cloture is invoked on an executive 
nomination or a motion to proceed, no Senator seeks recognition on the 
floor, it shall be in order for the Majority Leader to put the question 
on which cloture has been invoked.''.
                                 <all>
```
```
 
 
WHEAT-HRSpring - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                          Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/23/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       68,900
COMMITMENTS
  17,164   10,868    2,108   34,490   43,525   53,762   56,501   15,138   12,399

CHANGES FROM 12/16/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,683)
   2,152    1,356     -465    1,336    1,784    3,023    2,675     -340        8

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    24.9     15.8      3.1     50.1     63.2     78.0     82.0     22.0     18.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       94)
      21       14       11       45       39       71       60
```

----

Updated December 30, 2014
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

JOSEPH BOND, on behalf of himself and 

others similarly situated,

 Plaintiff,

VS.

FOLSOM INSURANCE AGENCY LLC, 

CODY FOLSOM, and BERKSHIRE 

HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES,

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

 CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24-CV-00075

 JUDGE MICHAEL J. TRUNCALE

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS FOLSOM INSURANCE AGENCY, LLC

AND CODY FOLSOM’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL

Before the Court is Defendants Folsom Insurance Agency LLC and Cody Folsom (hereinafter 

“Folsom Defendants”)’s Unopposed Motion to Substitute Counsel. [Dkt. 10]. The Folsom Defendants 

request the Court allow Haley Susan Eastham to withdraw as counsel for them in this matter, and to allow 

Jason R. Jobe and Yesha P. Patel of Thompson, Coe, Cousins & Irons, LLP to substitute as counsel herein. 

After considering the Folsom Defendants’ unopposed motion and reviewing the pleadings on file and all 

applicable law, the Court grants the same.

It is therefore ORDERED that Defendants Folsom Insurance Agency LLC and Cody Folsom’s 

Unopposed Motion to Substitute Counsel [Dkt. 10] is hereby GRANTED. The Clerk is INSTRUCTED to 

remove Haley Susan Eastham as counsel for the Folsom Defendants and to terminate all electronic notices 

to her. The Clerk is further INSTRUCTED to add Jason R. Jobe and Yesha P. Patel of Thompson, Coe, 

Cousins & Irons, LLP as counsel for the Folsom Defendants herein.

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 17th day of July, 2024.

Case 1:24-cv-00075-MJT Document 11 Filed 07/17/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 42
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 103 (Friday, May 27, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 32145]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11574]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, June 1, 2022, 10:00-11:00 a.m.

PLACE: This meeting will be held remotely.

STATUS: Commission Meeting--Open to the Public.

Matters To Be Considered: Decisional Matter: FY 2022 Midyear Review.
    All attendees should pre-register for the Commission meeting using 
the following link: https://cpsc.webex.com/cpsc/onstage/g.php?MTID=e7f67727fc4fe1732edb1ec8436c5d9fe.
    After registering you will receive a confirmation email containing 
information about joining the meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Alberta E. Mills, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, 301-504-7479 (Office) or 240-863-8938 
(Cell).

    Dated: May 25, 2022.
Alberta E. Mills,
Commission Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-11574 Filed 5-25-22; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
Melvin Scott MORMAN, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 18-9277

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
---

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Clive Barwin, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Melt Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer
as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and I have:

> a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
>     that material information relating to the small business issuer, including
>     its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
>     entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
>     being prepared;
>   b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers
>     disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
>     about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
>     end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation;
>     and
>   c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the
>     small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that
>     occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter
>     that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
>     the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):

> a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
>     in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
>     are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers
>     ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
>   b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
>     or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers
>     internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: August 14, 2007

/s/ Clive Barwin
  Clive Barwin, President, CEO and Secretary
  (Principal Executive Officer)

---
2004 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 12-8-2004 

# S outhco Inc v

. Kanebr id ge C orp P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 02-1243

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2004

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2004 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. F or mor e infor m at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion
" S outhc o Inc v

. K a nebr id g e C orp " (2004). 2004 D e cisio n s . P ape r 24. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2004/24UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE TH IRD CIR CU IT
No. 02-1243

SO UT HC O, I NC ., Appellant
v. KANEBRI DGE CORP ORATI ON

_________________ ON APPEAL FROM THE UNI TED STATES DIST RICT COURT FO R T HE EA STE RN DIST RIC T O F PE NN SY LV AN IA District Cou rt Judge: H onorab le Norm a L. Sha piro

(D.C. No. 99-cv- 04337)

____________________ Argued: December 3, 2002 Reargued En Banc: October 8, 2003 Before: SCIRI CA, Chi ef J udge , SLOVI TER, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH, McKEE, RENDELL, BARRY, AMBRO, FUENTES, SMITH, CHERTOFF, andBECKER, Circuit Judges (Opinion Fi led December 3, 2004)

ORDER AMENDI NG OPI NION The opinion in the above case is hereby amended as follows: At page two of the opi nion dele te thefollowing:* Chi ef Ju dgeSCI RIC A and J udge s SLOVITER, NYGAAR D, RENDELL, BARRY, AMBRO, FUENTES join t his opi nion. Judges MCK EE, SMITH , and BE CK ER Join Par ts I an d II. AL ITO , Circuit

Judge wit h w hom SC IRI CA , Chief Judge , S LOVITER , NYGAAR D, MCKEE (Jo ini ng Par ts I an d IIonl y) , RENDELL, B A R R Y , A M B R O , F U EN TE S, SM IT H (Jo in in g P ar ts I an d I I o nl y) and BE CK ER (Join ing Par t II on ly), Circuit Judges , joi n: Replace with t

he foll owing: AL ITO , Circuit

Judge : * BY THE COURT:

/s/ Sa mu el A . Ali to, Jr. Circuit Judge DAT ED: December 8, 2004
In the MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF Arthur Jay SMITH.

No. D-3044

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 21, 2019

Disbarment order entered.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00375-CR

John Douglas Edwards

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

221st District Court of Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 13-02-01583 CR

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

September 25, 2014
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018395EN.01002301.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 31.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 395/23 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9108 — PepsiCo/SodaStream International)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 395/07)

1.

On 24 October 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018395EN.01002301-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | PepsiCo Inc. (‘PepsiCo’, US), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | SodaStream International Ltd (‘SodaStream International’, Israel) |

PepsiCo acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of SodaStream International.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for PepsiCo: production and distribution of bottled and canned carbonated and non-carbonated soft drinks for consumers, production and commercialization of a consumer solution for flavoured water, production and commercialization of industrial concentrates and syrups for use for hotels, restaurants and catering services, of snack and dairy products,

—   for SodaStream International: manufacturing and commercialization of home carbonation systems that enable consumers to transform tap water into sparkling water and flavoured sparkling water, including home carbonation systems as well as carbonation bottles, CO2 cylinders and cylinder refilling services, dilutable concentrates, syrups and flavours.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9108 — PepsiCo/SodaStream International

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| E-mail: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018395EN.01002301-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---
Jason Edward RHEINSTEIN, Petitioner, v. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND

No. 19-140

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Smith Barney Allocation Series Inc.
125 Broad Street
New York, NY 10004




CERTIFICATION





I, R. Jay Gerken, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this report on Form N-SAR of Smith Barney
Allocation Series Inc. (on behalf of Balanced Portfolio,
Conservative Portfolio, Global Portfolio, Growth Portfolio, High
Growth Portfolio, Income Portfolio, Select Balanced Portfolio,
Select Growth Portfolio, Select High Growth Portfolio);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial information included in this
report, and the financial statements on which the financial information
is based, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows
(if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash
flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report.

September 27, 2002



/s/ R. Jay Gerken

R. Jay Gerken
President and Chief Executive Officer
Kwame Ali ASKIA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9181.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 23, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 30, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, September 30, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A20I0050. WILLIAMS INVESTMENT COMPANY d/b/a DAYS INN v. YULONDA 

GIRARDOT.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2018CV046
Danny FABRICANT, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR the NINTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-5097

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
NEXUS SERVICES, INC., et al., Petitioners v. Donald Lee MORAN, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Deputy Sheriff of Augusta County, Virginia, et al.

No. 19-45

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.