alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11



                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                          FOR THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,  FOR SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
                                 1999        1998             1999        1998
                             -----------  -----------      -----------  -----------
<S>                          <C>          <C>              <C>          <C>
Basic:

Net income ................  $ 8,885,083  $14,996,144      $ 9,844,740  $28,310,506
                             ===========  ===========      ===========  ===========

Weighted average number of
shares of common stock
outstanding ...............   53,008,409   53,849,094       53,106,576   53,319,341

Net income per common
 share ....................  $      0.17  $      0.28      $      0.19  $      0.53
                             ===========  ===========      ===========  ===========


Diluted:

Net income ................  $ 8,885,083  $14,996.144      $ 9,844,740  $28,310,506
                             ===========  ===========      ===========  ===========

Weighted average number of
shares of common stock
outstanding ...............   53,008,409   53,849,094       53,106,576   53,319,341

Net effect of dilutive
stock options--based on
the treasury stock method
using average market price     3,303,506    7,271,377        3,747,954    7,558,875
                             -----------  -----------      -----------  -----------

Total weighted average
number of shares of common
stock and common stock
equivalents outstanding ...   56,311,915   61,120,471       56,854,530   60,878,216
                             ===========  ===========      ===========  ===========

Net income per common
 share ....................  $      0.16  $      0.25      $      0.17  $      0.47
                             ===========  ===========      ===========  ===========
</TABLE>
Anthony L. VIOLA, Petitioner v. Bradley TATE, Warden

No. 19-5659

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 90 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 90

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR HOLOCAUST DAYS OF REMEMBRANCE 
              CEREMONY.

    Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center is authorized to be 
used on April 30, 2014, for a ceremony as part of the commemoration of 
the days of remembrance

              

 of victims of the Holocaust. Physical preparations for the conduct of 
the ceremony shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as 
may be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 7, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 90

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
for a ceremony as part of the commemoration of the days of remembrance 
                      of victims of the Holocaust.
```
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as ofOctober 6, 2017, by and among GS MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORPORATION II, asDepositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Servicer, WELLS FARGOBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, U.S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,as Certificate Administrator, Custodian and Trustee with respect to CommercialMortgage Pass Through Certificates Series 2017-SLP (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section11.7 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Marthinsen, Managing Director of SpecialServicing do hereby certify that:

 

1.      A review of theactivities of the Special Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance perthe Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2.     To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2019.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Marthinsen

DanielMarthinsen, Managing Director

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
## United States Court of Appeals
**For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________

No. 21

- 2779

___________________________

United States of America

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Raymond L. Pierce

Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________

Submitted: December 2 8 , 2021 Filed: January 3, 2022 [Unpublished]

____________
Before GRUENDER, ERICKSON , and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Raymond Pierce appeals the sentence, which was within the United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual Guidelines advisory range, imposed by the district

court 1 after he pled gu ilty to a firearm offense under a plea agreement containing an

1 The Honorable Roseann A. Ketchmark, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.-2- appeal waiver. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the reasonableness of
Pierce’s sentence. Pierce has filed a pro se supplemental brief stating that discovery

was not shown to him before he pleaded guilty, leading to an improperly enhanced

sentence.

Upon careful review, we conclude the appeal waiver is valid, enforceable, and

a pplicable to the issues raised in this appeal. See United States v. Scott , 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) ( reviewing de novo the validity and applicability of appeal waiver); United States v. Andis , 333 F.3d 886, 889

− 92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) ( enforcing appeal waiver if appeal falls within scope of waiver, defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into plea agreement and waiver, and it would not result in miscarriage of justice ). Pierce’s challenge to the sentencing enhancements do not call into questi on the validity of his plea, see United States v. Michelsen , 141 F.3d 867, 871

− 72 (8th Cir. 1998) ( enforcing appeal waiver result ing from knowing and voluntary decision); and while he states that discovery was not shown to him before he pled guilty, he did not move to withdraw his guilty plea in the district court, see United States v. Umanzor

, 617 F.3d 1053, 1060 (8th Cir. 2010) (deferring claim the plea was constitutionally flawed to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceeding whe n defendant did not move to withdraw guil ty plea in district court).

We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non

- frivolous issues for appeal falling outside the scope of the waiver. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal based on the appeal waiver, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
Report of Independent Accountants

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
The Salomon Brothers Fund Inc


In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements of The
Salomon Brothers Fund Inc, (hereafter referred to as the "Fund") for the
year ended December 31, 2000, we considered its internal control, including
control activities for safeguarding securities, in order to determine our
auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the
financial statements and to comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR, not
to provide assurance on internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and maintaining
internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and
judgments by management are required to assess the expected benefits and
related costs of controls.  Generally, controls that are relevant to an
audit pertain to the entity's objective of preparing financial statements
for external purposes that are fairly presented in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.  Those controls include the safeguarding of
assets against unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition.
Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or fraud may
occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any evaluation of internal
control to future periods is subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of
their design and operation may deteriorate.
Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily disclose all
matters in internal control that might be material weaknesses under
standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants.  A material weakness is a condition in which the design or
operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce
to a relatively low level the risk that misstatements caused by error or
fraud in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial
statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely
period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned
functions.  However, we noted no matters involving internal control and its
operation, including controls for safeguarding securities, that we consider
to be material weaknesses as defined above as of December 31, 2000.
This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Board of
Directors, management and the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not
intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified
parties.


February 21, 2001

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Salomon Brothers Fund Inc

	(2)
# C_2018113EN.01000101.xml

| 27.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8694 — Hochtief/Abertis)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 113/01)

On 6 February 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8694. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8694. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Nicholas WILKERSON, Petitioner, v. ALABAMA.

No. 19-6006.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama denied.
Order entered March 26, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 11

- 00157

- CR

MALONE, AARON LEE, Appellant

v
.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Cour t Cause No. F08

- 39160

- LI



### O RDER

Appellant’s Motion for Self Representation is GRANTED. The clerk is directed to file

appellant’s Motion for Rehearing.

/s/ MARTIN RICHTER JUSTICE
Daniel George BROWN, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 18-9490

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
```
 
 
WHEAT-HRSpring - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                          Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 09/30/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       65,743
COMMITMENTS
  17,201    7,681    4,931   33,095   40,505   55,227   53,117   10,516   12,626

CHANGES FROM 09/23/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        290)
    -721      531    1,078      641   -1,248      998      361     -708      -71

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    26.2     11.7      7.5     50.3     61.6     84.0     80.8     16.0     19.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       92)
      16       17       14       45       38       71       63
```

----

Updated October 3, 2014
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 120 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR CEREMONY 

4 TO PRESENT CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL 

5 TO WORLD WAR II MEMBERS OF CIVIL AIR 

6 PATROL. 

7 Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center is 

8 authorized to be used on December 10, 2014, for 
2 

•HCON 120 EH 

1 aceremony to present the Congressional Gold Medal to the 

2 World War II members of the Civil Air Patrol collectively, 

3 in recognition of the military service and exemplary record 

4 of the Civil Air Patrol during World War II. Physical 

5 preparations for the conduct of the ceremony shall be car6 ried out in accordance with such conditions as the Archi7 tect of the Capitol may prescribe. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 3, 

2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 120 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the 

II members of the Civil Air Patrol. the Congressional Gold Medal to the World War Capitol Visitor Center for a ceremony to present
NEW YORK STATE RIFLE & PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, New York, et al.

No. 18-280.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 15, 2019.

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted. Motion of Neal Goldfarb for leave to participate *399in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument denied.
Jermaine JAMES, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8038.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

** **

** **

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as ofDecember 1, 2017, by and among UBS COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIZATION CORP., asDepositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, KEYBANKNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Trustee, and PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Operating Advisorand as Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates Series 2017-C7 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement. 

 

Pursuantto Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice Presidentof Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that: 

 

1. A review of theactivities of the Master Servicer during the period from December 1, 2017through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”),  and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and 

 

2. To the best ofmy knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all ofits obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period. 

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2018. 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

DanielBober 

ExecutiveVice President

WellsFargo Bank 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo)  Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 12/24/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       63,589
COMMITMENTS
  15,534   10,925    2,345   31,172   37,044   49,050   50,314   14,539   13,275

CHANGES FROM 12/17/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,294)
     355      266     -280    1,183    1,584    1,258    1,570       37     -275

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    24.4     17.2      3.7     49.0     58.3     77.1     79.1     22.9     20.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       83)
      23       18       10       40       25       65       51
```

----

Updated December 30, 2013
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018201EN.01001201.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 12.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/12 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.8909 — KME/MKM)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 201/06)

1.

On 4 June 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018201EN.01001201-E0001), by which KME AG (‘KME’, Germany), a subsidiary of INTEK GROUP S.p.A ultimately controlled by Quattroduedue Holding B.V., acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of MKM Mansfelder Kupfer and Messing GmbH (‘MKM’, Germany), by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for KME: an industrial group active in the manufacturing and marketing of copper and copper alloy products,

—   for MKM: a manufacturer of intermediate and semi-finished products made from copper and copper alloys.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.8909 — KME/MKM

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018201EN.01001201-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---
Francisco Gonzalez JOSE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9738

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,935
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,726
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,560
<INVENTORY>                                     49,356
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                71,657
<PP&E>                                         110,773
<DEPRECIATION>                                  64,605
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 121,324
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,201
<BONDS>                                        167,599
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (71,061)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   121,324
<SALES>                                        118,243
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               118,243
<CGS>                                           93,874
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  115,433
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,028
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,293
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,867)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,867)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,867)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>