alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.a

I, John P. Manning, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund V L.P.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|November 14, 2007 | /s/ John P. Manning
|----------------- | -------------------
|                  | John P. Manning    
|                  | Principal          
|                  | Executive Officer  
|                  |                    
|                  |
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, 

LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

RESTAURANT BRANDS 

INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00288-JRG-RSP

STIPULATED JOINT MOTION FOR DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Analytical 

Technologies, LLC (“Analytical”) and Defendant Restaurant Brands International Inc. (“RBI”) 

respectfully submit this stipulation of dismissal of Analytical’s claims against RBI with prejudice and 

RBI’s counterclaims against Analytical without prejudice. Each party is to bear its own costs, expenses, 

and attorneys’ fees.

Dated: April 18, 2024 Respectfully Submitted

/s/ Randall Garteiser

Randall Garteiser 

 Texas Bar No. 24038912

 rgarteiser@ghiplaw.com

GARTEISER HONEA, PLLC

119 W. Ferguson Street

Tyler, Texas 75702

Telephone: (903) 705-7420

Facsimile: (903) 405-3999

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

Case 2:23-cv-00288-JRG-RSP Document 46 Filed 04/18/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 376
2

/s/ Alexander Hale Martin

Alexander Hale Martin

Texas Bar No. 24091828

Neil J. McNabnay

Texas Bar No. 24002583

Ricardo J. Bonilla

Texas Bar No. 24082704

Ashu Balimba

Texas Bar No. 24099369

Noel Chakkalakal

Texas Bar No. 24053676

martin@fr.com

mcnabnay@fr.com

rbonilla@fr.com

balimba@fr.com

chakkalakal@fr.com

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

1717 Main Street, Suite 5000

Dallas, Texas 75201

(214) 747-5070 (Telephone)

(214) 747-2091 (Facsimile)

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

Case 2:23-cv-00288-JRG-RSP Document 46 Filed 04/18/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 377
3

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

The undersigned attorney represents and confirms that a conference was conducted with 

opposing counsel prior to filing this Joint Stipulation, and counsel is agreed to the relief requested 

herein.

/s/ Randall Garteiser

Randall Garteiser 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document has been served on all counsel of record via the Court’s ECF system.

/s/ Randall T. Garteiser

Randall T. Garteiser

Case 2:23-cv-00288-JRG-RSP Document 46 Filed 04/18/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 378
# C_2018053EN.01000101.xml

| 13.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8695 — PSA/TIL/PPIT)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 53/01)

On 6 February 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8695. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8695. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Quintin Phillippe JONES, Petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 19-6465.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Erbey BOTELLO, aka Erbey Botello-Alanis, aka Javier Garcia, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5447

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# C_2018400EN.01001601.xml

| 6.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 400/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 400/16

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9071 — Banca Generali/Saxo Bank/JV)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 400/10)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Banca Generali S.p.A. (‘Banca Generali’, Italy), controlled by Assicurazioni Generali S.p.A. (‘Assicurazioni Generali’, Italy); |
| --- | --- |

—

Banca Generali S.p.A. (‘Banca Generali’, Italy), controlled by Assicurazioni Generali S.p.A. (‘Assicurazioni Generali’, Italy);

| — | Saxo Bank A/S (‘Saxo Bank’, Denmark), controlled by Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co., Ltd (‘Zhejiang Geely Holding Group’, China); |
| --- | --- |

—

Saxo Bank A/S (‘Saxo Bank’, Denmark), controlled by Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co., Ltd (‘Zhejiang Geely Holding Group’, China);

| — | BG SAXO SIM S.p.A., a newly created entity (‘NewCo’, Italy). |
| --- | --- |

—

BG SAXO SIM S.p.A., a newly created entity (‘NewCo’, Italy).

Banca Generali and Saxo Bank acquire, within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation, joint control over NewCo.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.

2.

| — | Banca Generali offers a wide range of products and services in the banking, financial and insurance sectors; |
| --- | --- |

—

Banca Generali offers a wide range of products and services in the banking, financial and insurance sectors;

| — | Saxo Bank is an online investment bank specializing in online trading and investment services; |
| --- | --- |

—

Saxo Bank is an online investment bank specializing in online trading and investment services;

| — | NewCo is an online platform for online trading in Italy. |
| --- | --- |

—

NewCo is an online platform for online trading in Italy.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9071 — Banca Generali/Saxo Bank/JV

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| --- |
| Fax +32 229-64301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 229-64301

Postal address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 40 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 40

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
                  protect the rights of crime victims.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 23, 2013

 Mr. Franks of Arizona (for himself, Mr. Costa, Mr. Royce, Mr. Gosar, 
  Mr. Schweikert, Mr. Salmon, Mr. Jones, Mr. Chabot, Mr. Meadows, Mr. 
   Nunnelee, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Bentivolio, Mr. Fleming, and Mr. Yoder) 
 introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
                  protect the rights of crime victims.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The rights of a crime victim to fairness, respect, and 
dignity, being capable of protection without denying the constitutional 
rights of the accused, shall not be denied or abridged by the United 
States or any State. The crime victim shall, moreover, have the rights 
to reasonable notice of, and shall not be excluded from, public 
proceedings relating to the offense, to be heard at any release, plea, 
sentencing, or other such proceeding involving any right established by 
this article, to proceedings free from unreasonable delay, to 
reasonable notice of the release or escape of the accused, to due 
consideration of the crime victim's safety and privacy, and to 
restitution. The crime victim or the crime victim's lawful 
representative has standing to fully assert and enforce these rights in 
any court. Nothing in this article provides grounds for a new trial or 
any claim for damages and no person accused of the conduct described in 
section 2 of this article may obtain any form of relief.
    ``Section 2. For purposes of this article, a crime victim includes 
any person against whom the criminal offense is committed or who is 
directly and proximately harmed by the commission of an act, which, if 
committed by a competent adult, would constitute a crime.
    ``Section 3. This article shall be inoperative unless it has been 
ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of 
three-fourths of the several States within 14 years after the date of 
its submission to the States by the Congress. This article shall take 
effect on the 180th day after the date of its ratification.''.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: November 21, 2005
    
    By /s/ Eric H. PaulsonEric H. PaulsonChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Order entered May 22, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-15-00660-CV

IN RE ALTESSE HEALTHCARE SOLUTI ONS, INC. AND SHAWNA BOUDREAUX, Relators

Original Proceeding from the 219th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 219-04978-2014



### ORDER Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Fillmore and Evans

Based on the Court’s opin ion of this date, we DENY the petition for writ of mandamus.

We ORDER relators to bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
# C_2018100EN.01000201.xml

| 16.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8606 — ELG Haniel/Iberinox/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 100/03)

On 12 March 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8606. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8606. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2018151EN.01005401.xml

| 30.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/54

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8840 — Apollo/JSW/Monnet)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 151/04)

On 28 March 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8840. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8840. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

          - 39 CFR Part 111

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Proposed rule; withdrawal.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service is withdrawing the proposed rule that would have added new subsections to establish parcel selvage standards and to clarify how to measure parcels prepared in soft packaging.

# DATES:

The proposed rule published on March 24, 2022 (87 FR 16700), is withdrawn effective [immediately or June 13, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Karen F. Key at (202) 268-7492 or Garry Rodriguez at (202) 268-7281.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the proposed rule that was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on March 24, 2022, the Postal Service proposed to implement a two-inch maximum of selvage on the length and the width of a parcel prepared in soft packaging and to provide a clarification defining how to measure parcels prepared in soft packaging to generally determine the length, width, and height of the mailpiece.                

In consideration of concerns expressed by members of the mailing community during the proposed rule comment period, the Postal Service has elected to withdraw the proposed rule.

Joshua J. Hofer,

Attorney, Ethics & Legal Compliance.

[FR Doc. 2022-12596 Filed 6-10-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Eastern District of Texas

COMMUNICATION INTERFACE TECHNOLOGIES 

LLC,

4:24-cv-14

CHICK-FIL-A, INC.

CHICK-FIL-A, INC. 

c/o its Registered Agent 

 Pearson, Susan Tammy 

5200 BUFFINGTON RD 

ATLANTA, GA, 30349-2998, USA

Trevor Beaty 

BEATY LEGAL PLLC 

514 North Elm Street 

Sherman, Texas 75090 

Case 4:24-cv-00014-SDJ Document 4 Filed 01/09/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 216
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

4:24-cv-14 0.00 Print Save As... Reset

Case 4:24-cv-00014-SDJ Document 4 Filed 01/09/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 217
Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 1-1 Filed 12/19/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 20