alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 114 (Tuesday, June 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 35982]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12814]



[[Page 35982]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than June 29, 2022.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Chris P. Wangen, Assistant 
Vice President), 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291, 
or by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b9f4f8f9d4c9d5ca97dfcbdb97d6cbde"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7e333f3e130e120d50180c1c50110c19">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. The Irrevocable Gifting Trust fbo James F. Poepl dated December 
21, 2020, James F. Poepl, as trustee, and the Irrevocable Gifting Trust 
fbo Jacob M. Poepl dated December 21, 2020, Jacob M. Poepl, as trustee, 
all of Hastings, Minnesota; and the Irrevocable Gifting Trust fbo 
Matthew J. Poepl dated December 21, 2020, Matthew J. Poepl, as trustee, 
both of West St. Paul, Minnesota; to become members of the Poepl Family 
Group, a group acting in concert, to retain voting shares of Vermillion 
Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of 
Vermillion State Bank, both of Vermillion, Minnesota.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2022-12814 Filed 6-13-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Jonsha BELL, Petitioner, v. MISSISSIPPI.

No. 18-1500

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Mississippi denied.
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 4- 13 97

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Vern on L. Jo hn so n
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v.
SSM Heal th care Sy st em
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll ee

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Eas te rn Dis tri ct of M is so ur i - St . Lou is

__ __ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: Nov em

be r 14 , 20 14 Fil ed : No ve m

be r 20 , 20 14 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re WOL LMAN, BYE, and MELLOY, Circu it Ju dg es

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Dr. Vern on L. Jo hn so n ap pe al s th e di st ric t co ur t’s ad ve rs e gr an t of su m m ary 1 jud gm en t in hi s st at e-t or t su it fo r da m ag es ari si ng fro m rev oc at i o n o f hi s ho sp it al

The Hon or ab le Hen ry E. Aut rey, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e East ern 1 Dis tri ct of M is so ur i.pr iv il eg es ; hi s su it was rem ov ed to fed eral co u r t un de r th e Heal th Care Qua li ty

Im pr ov em en t Act (HCQIA). Upo n de no vo rev ie w, we fin d no ba si s fo r ov ert ur ni ng th e di st ric t co ur t’s de te rm in at io n th at SSM was en ti tl ed to HCQIA im m un it y , be cau se Dr. Jo h n so n di d no t sa ti sf y hi s bu rd en of pr od uc in g ev id en ce th at wou ld al lo w a
reas on ab le jury to fin d th at th e pe er rev ie w p r o c e s s fai le d to m eet HCQIA’s st an da rd s. See Lee v. Trin it y Lu t he ran Hos p., 40 8 F.3 d 10 64 , 10 70 -7 1 (8 th Ci r. 20 05 ). The jud gm en t of th e di st ric t co u rt is affi rm ed , s ee 8t h Ci r. R. 47 B, an d Dr.

2 Jo hn so n’s p en di ng m ot io n i s g ran te d.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

W e de cl in e to ad dr es s th e m at te rs Dr. Jo hn so n rai se s fo r th e fi rs t t im e in hi s 2 op en in g br ie f, se e St on e v. Harry, 36 4 F.3 d 91 2, 9 1 4

- 1 5 (8 th Ci r. 20 04 ), or in hi s rep ly brie f, se e Je nk in s v . W in te r, 54 0 F .3d 74 2, 7 51 (8t h C ir. 2 00 8)

. -2

-
# C_2018082EN.01000101.xml

| 5.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8726 — Oney/4Finance/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 82/01)

On 27 February 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8726. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8726. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018179EN.01000701.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 25.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/7 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.8808 — T-Mobile Austria/UPC Austria)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 179/03)

1.

On 18 May 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018179EN.01000701-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | T-Mobile Austria GmbH (‘TMA’, Austria) controlled by T-Mobile Austria Holding and belonging to Deutsche Telekom AG (‘DTAG’, Germany), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | UPC Austria GmbH (Austria), controlled by Liberty Global Group (United Kingdom). |

DTAG acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of UPC Austria GmbH.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for T-Mobile Austria: TMA is a mobile network operator which owns a 2G, 3G and 4G network with nationwide coverage in Austria. It offers mobile telecommunications services to private and business customers at retail level and to mobile virtual network operators at wholesale level. TMA is ultimately controlled by DTAG which, together with its group companies, is an integrated telecommunications company headquartered in Bonn, Germany. DTAG provides fixed and mobile telecommunications as well as internet and IPTV services to consumers mainly in Europe,

—   for UPC Austria: the company owns and operates hybrid fibre-coaxial (HFC) cable network in parts of Austria. UPC offers cable TV, fixed internet and fixed telephony services to private and business customers over its HFC cable network.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.8808 — T-Mobile Austria/UPC Austria

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018179EN.01000701-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---
Antonio FLORES, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6295

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                 5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1996  
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                             SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                   5,783,600   
<SECURITIES>                             28,181,700  
<RECEIVABLES>                            11,870,800  
<ALLOWANCES>                             893,000     
<INVENTORY>                              11,712,100  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         58,775,700  
<PP&E>                                   7,253,700   
<DEPRECIATION>                           0          
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           66,074,500  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    22,639,300  
<BONDS>                                  0           
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0           
<PREFERRED>                              0           
<COMMON>                                 13,300      
<OTHER-SE>                               43,421,900  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             66,074,500  
<SALES>                                  61,097,000  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         62,926,300  
<CGS>                                    50,975,300  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            13,216,400  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         0           
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0           
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       570,300     
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (2,903,000) 
<INCOME-TAX>                             0           
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (2,903,000) 
<DISCONTINUED>                           0           
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0           
<CHANGES>                                0           
<NET-INCOME>                             (2,903,000) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            (0.25)      
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0           
        

</TABLE>
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/12/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       39,338
COMMITMENTS
   4,481    2,821    2,413   22,059   24,887   28,953   30,121   10,385    9,217

CHANGES FROM 03/05/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,183)
     -62      -38       72      677      826      687      860      496      323

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    11.4      7.2      6.1     56.1     63.3     73.6     76.6     26.4     23.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       51)
       8        8        7       29       23       39       37
```

----

Updated March 15, 2013
Lawrence MULLIGAN, Petitioner v. Bruce JALBERT, et ux.

No. 19-84

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Arthur J. LOMAX, Petitioner v. Christina ORTIZ-MARQUEZ, et al.

No. 18-8369

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 18, 2019

*Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit granted limited to the following question: Does a dismissal without prejudice for failure to state a claim count as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) ?
# C_2018414EN.01000101.xml

| 15.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8998 — KKR/BMC Software)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 414/01)

On 14 September 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8998. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8998. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,439
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,787,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,886
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,886)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,886)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.00)
        

</TABLE>
Lyndal D. RITTERBUSH, Petitioner v. Larry BENZON.

No. 19-6170

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 06/03/14          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      448,926
COMMITMENTS
 139,665  216,461   95,368  184,638  108,180  419,671  420,009   29,255   28,917

CHANGES FROM 05/27/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     28,560)
  16,197   11,214    9,560      705    5,697   26,462   26,471    2,098    2,089

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    31.1     48.2     21.2     41.1     24.1     93.5     93.6      6.5      6.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      215)
      64       89       92       40       41      159      180
```

----

Updated June 6, 2014
Amoire DUPREE, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5343

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

*475Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Landon QUINN, Petitioner v. Darrel VANNOY, Warden

No. 18-9744

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Louisiana denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0310 IN THE MATTER OF: S.H., Respondent and Appellant

. **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 22 , 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 16 2023

10/16/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0310
James MILLS, Petitioner v. CITY OF COVINA, CALIFORNIA, et al.

No. 19-321

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
James Lester WILLIAMS, Jr., Petitioner, v. Jamai F. SAMUELS

No. 19-5329

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until October 28, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Jonathon William-Durand NEUHARD, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6340

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# C_2020011EN.01005801.xml

| 13.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/58

---

P8_TA(2018)0361

EU-Canada air transport agreement ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 2 October 2018 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Air Transport Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and Canada, of the other part (06730/2018 – C8-0160/2018 – 2009/0018(NLE))

(Consent)

(2020/C 011/15)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (06730/2018), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (06730/2018),

| — | having regard to the Agreement on Air Transport between Canada and the European Community and its Member States (1), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Agreement on Air Transport between Canada and the European Community and its Member States (1),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Articles 100(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0160/2018), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Articles 100(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0160/2018),

| — | having regard to Rule 99(1) and (4), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 99(1) and (4), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A8-0254/2018), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A8-0254/2018),

| 1. | Gives its consent to conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Canada. |
| --- | --- |

2.

---

(1)  OJ L 207, 6.8.2010, p. 32

---