alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Wesley JEFFERSON, Petitioner v. Wendy KELLEY, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, et al.

No. 19-6371

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6598

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. CHARLES JETER GRIFFITH, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (1:03-cr-00050-LHT; 1:05-cv-263-LHT) Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 8, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Jeter Griffith, Appellant Pro Se. Jill Westmoreland Rose, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Charles Jeter Griffith seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Griffith has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 31

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David J. Cutler, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Atomic Paintball, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as  defined  in  Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for the
registrant and I have:

    a)     designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure that
           material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,  including  its
           consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
           entities,  particularly  during the  period in which  this  quarterly
           report is being prepared;

    b)     evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
           and  procedures  as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date
           of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

    c)     presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
           the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of
           the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

    a)     all  significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
           controls which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
           record,  process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
           identified for the registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
           internal controls; and

    b)     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
           employees who have a  significant role in  the  registrant's internal
           controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this report
whether or not there were significant  changes in internal  controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: November 12, 2008


By:      /s/ David J. Cutler
         ----------------------------------
         David J. Cutler
         Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018365EN.01000601.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 9.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 365/6 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9112 — OEP/Crayon)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 365/07)

1.

On 28 September 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018365EN.01000601-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | One Equity Partners VII, L.P., One Equity Partners VII-A, L.P. and One Equity Partners VII-B, L.P (‘OEP’) (US); |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Crayon Group Holding ASA (Norway). |

OEP acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Crayon Group Holding ASA.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for OEP: private equity funds;

—   for Crayon: software licensing and IT consulting services.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018365EN.01000601-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9112 — OEP/Crayon

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018365EN.01000601-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018365EN.01000601-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET-WTI - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                      Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 10/07/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      483,303
COMMITMENTS
  83,018   38,973  128,817  255,481  300,871  467,316  468,661   15,987   14,642

CHANGES FROM 09/30/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     16,828)
  -7,185    3,229    9,120   17,515    8,033   19,450   20,382   -2,622   -3,554

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    17.2      8.1     26.7     52.9     62.3     96.7     97.0      3.3      3.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      140)
      38       29       58       61       64      125      130
```

----

Updated October 10, 2014
Georgia-Pacific Corporation



 Exhibit 10.38(iv) 
  
 GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION 
 OUTSIDE DIRECTORS STOCK PLAN 
  
 AMENDMENT NO. 3 
  
 THIS AMENDMENT to the Georgia-Pacific
Corporation Outside Directors Stock Plan (the “Plan”), approved by the Board of Directors of Georgia-Pacific Corporation (the “Board”) and effective as stated below; 
  
 W I T N E S S E T H: 
  
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 4.6 of the Plan, the Board has retained the right to amend or terminate the Plan at any time, subject to certain restrictions
stated in the Plan, which the Board has determined are not applicable to this amendment; 
  
 WHEREAS, the Board desires to amend the Plan to address the treatment of grants under the Plan in the event of any corporate restructuring, including, but not limited to, any merger, reorganization, consolidation,
recapitalization, redemption, stock split, or extraordinary distribution with respect to Georgia-Pacific Corporation – Georgia-Pacific Group Common Stock or Georgia-Pacific Corporation – Timber Group Common Stock (collectively,
“Common Stock”) or other change in corporate structure affecting the Common Stock; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Board has determined that under the terms of the Plan, such amendments will not require shareholder approval; 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the Board hereby amends the
Plan effective as of September 5, 2001, as follows: 
  
 1. The
Plan is amended by a new Section 4.8 as follows: 
  

	 	4.8	 	Corporate Restructuring. 

  
 (a) No Bar to Corporate Restructuring. The existence of this Plan or the grant of any Stock under this Plan shall not affect in any way the right or power
of G-P or its shareholders (i) to make or authorize any and all adjustments, recapitalizations, reorganizations or other changes in G-P’s capital structure or its business, or any merger or consolidation of G-P, (ii) to issue bonds, debentures,
preferred or preference stocks ahead of or affecting the Stock or the rights thereof, to dissolve or liquidate G-P, (iii) to sell or transfer all or part of its assets or business or (iv) to effect any other corporate act or proceeding, whether of a
similar character or otherwise. 
  
 (b) Capital
Readjustments/Modifications. In the event of any merger, reorganization, consolidation, recapitalization, redemption, stock dividend, stock split, or extraordinary distribution with respect to the Stock or other change in corporate structure
affecting the Stock, 








 
the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of G-P shall have the authority to make such equitable substitution or adjustments as he may determine in
his sole discretion to be appropriate and in futherance of the goals of this Plan. Any Stock substituted or adjusted under this Section 4.8(b) will be subject to the same restrictions (and have the same terms and conditions) as the Stock originally
granted. 
  
 2. Except as hereinabove and heretofore amended and
modified, the Plan as originally adopted and subsequently amended shall remain in full force and effect.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**WRITTEN STATEMENT**

**OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER**

 

The undersigned herebycertify that the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008filed by TNS, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the issuer.

 
| Dated: November 10, 2008                          |
|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                   |
| /s/ HENRY H. GRAHAM, JR.                               |   |
|                                                   |
| Henry H. Graham, Jr.                              |
| Chief Executive Officer                                |
|                                                   |
| Dated: November 10, 2008                          |
|                                                   |
| /s/ DENNIS L. RANDOLPH, JR.                            |   |
|                                                   |
| Dennis L. Randolph, Jr.                           |
| Executive Vice President, Chief Financial  Officer and |
| Treasurer                                              |

 

----
Jeffrey T. MAEHR, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5151

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
Derron Ronzay PITTMAN, Petitioner v. DAL GLOBAL SERVICES, et al.

No. 19M55

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/23/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       85,346
COMMITMENTS
  23,548    2,896    1,745   54,684   78,607   79,977   83,248    5,369    2,098

CHANGES FROM 04/16/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        758)
     -26      532     -182    1,307      700    1,099    1,050     -341     -292

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    27.6      3.4      2.0     64.1     92.1     93.7     97.5      6.3      2.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       75)
      11        4        1       39       35       50       40
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/23/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      199,130
COMMITMENTS
  65,033   37,748    1,187  117,041  153,396  183,261  192,331   15,869    6,799

CHANGES FROM 04/16/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -3,826)
     469   -3,019     -185   -2,253     -186   -1,969   -3,390   -1,857     -436

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    32.7     19.0      0.6     58.8     77.0     92.0     96.6      8.0      3.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      147)
      34       16        8       70       51      109       70
```

----

Updated April 26, 2013
Yurie YAMANO, Petitioner v. HAWAII STATE JUDICIARY, et al.

No. 19-5850

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# **Exhibit 99.2**

 

# **GREENPOINTFINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES**

# **Certificationof Periodic Report**

 

I, JeffreyR. Leeds, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of GreenPointFinancial Corp. (the “Company”), certify,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section1350, that:

 

(1)                                  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Companyfor the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)                                  the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

Dated:  August 9, 2002

 

 
|   | /s/ Jeffrey R. Leeds                                 |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Jeffrey R. Leeds                                     |
|   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   | GreenPoint Financial Corp.                           |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 130 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 130

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2015, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Continuing 
Appropriations Resolution, 2015 (Public Law 113-164) is amended by 
striking the date

              

 specified in section 106(3) and inserting ``December 13, 2014''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 11, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             H. J. RES. 130

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2015, and for 
                            other purposes.
```
Samantha L. COLEMAN, Petitioner, v. SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA, INC.

No. 18-1426.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 2

FILED UNDER SEAL 

PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case 2:24-cv-00093-JRG Document 88-2 Filed 10/16/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 4361
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1028 

To ensure that any authority of the Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund to 

borrow amounts from the Treasury is used only to pay mortgage insurance claims. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2013 

Mr. CAPUANO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To ensure that any authority of the Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund to borrow amounts from the Treasury is 

used only to pay mortgage insurance claims. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘End Unnecessary Bor5 rowing Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON USE OF BORROWING AUTHORITY. 

7 Paragraph (2) of section 205(f) of the National 

8 Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1711(f)(2)) is amended— 

9 (1) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ after ‘‘(2)’’; and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1028 IH

1 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub2 paragraphs: 

3 ‘‘(B) Subparagraph (A) may not be construed 

4 to authorize or require the Secretary to borrow any 

5 amounts to comply with the capital ratio require6 ment under such subparagraph. 

7 ‘‘(C) Notwithstanding any other provision of 

8 law, any authority of the Secretary under this Act 

9 or otherwise to borrow amounts from the Treasury 

10 of the United States for the Mutual Mortgage Insur11 ance Fund may be used only to the extent necessary 

12 to pay claims on mortgage insurance that is an obli13 gation of such Fund.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,864
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,118
<ALLOWANCES>                                       669
<INVENTORY>                                     44,954
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,133
<PP&E>                                          61,202
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,189
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 122,721
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,066
<BONDS>                                         39,236
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            80
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,479
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   122,721
<SALES>                                        117,452
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               117,452
<CGS>                                           86,088
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  116,863
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,754
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,165)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       432
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (733)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (733)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)
        

</TABLE>
1 The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa. ___________ No. 95-1437

___________ Larry Crossley, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Northern District of Iowa. Liberty Bank & Trust Co., * formerly known as Forest City * [UNPUBLISHED] Bank & Trust Co.; Thomas J. * Hromatka, C.E.O.; Hertz Farm * Management Inc.; Gary Loos, as * Receiver; Farmers Coop * Association Forest City; Farmers* Co-op Elevator Co. Thompson; * Farmers Co-op Elevator Co. * Leland; Don Severson; Gary * Sterling; Ronald G. Pyle; Ronald* Penning, and yet to be named * John Does, * * Appellees. *

__________ Submitted: December 29, 1995 Filed: January 10, 1996

__________ Before WOLLMAN, MAGILL, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Larry Crossley appeals from the district court's 1 orders granting summary judgment in favor of defendants, and denying his motion for reconsideration. Having carefully reviewed the record-2- and the parties' briefs, we conclude the judgment of the district court was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.