alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020388EN.01034701.xml

| 13.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 388/347 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 388/347

---

P8_TA(2018)0508

EU-Jordan Euro-Mediterranean Aviation Agreement (accession of Croatia) ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 12 December 2018 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union and its Member States, of a Protocol amending the Euro-Mediterranean Aviation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, of the other part, to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia (07067/2015 — C8-0189/2016 — 2015/0003(NLE))

(Consent)

(2020/C 388/38)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (07067/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (07067/2015),

| — | having regard to the draft Protocol amending the Euro-Mediterranean Aviation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, of the other part, to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia (07066/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Protocol amending the Euro-Mediterranean Aviation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, of the other part, to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia (07066/2015),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 100(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0189/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 100(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0189/2016),

| — | having regard to Rule 99(1) and 4 and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 99(1) and 4 and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A8-0371/2018), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A8-0371/2018),

| 1. | Gives its consent to conclusion of the protocol; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. |
| --- | --- |

2.

---
Michael A. YOUNG, petitioner, v. Thomas DUNCAN, et al.

No. 18-8765.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 23, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
EX-32.1
      4
      d49324exv32w1.htm CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
  
     
 **Exhibit 32.1**
 **CERTIFICATION
      OF PERIODIC REPORT**
 I,
      Dennis G. McLaughlin, III, Chief Executive Officer of Earth Biofuels, Inc.
      (the
“Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my
      knowledge:
 (1) the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the nine months
      ended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
 (2) the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:
      November 20, 2007
 /s/
                Dennis G. McLaughlin, IIIDennis
                G. McLaughlin, IIIChief
                Executive Officer
 A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000797480
<NAME> SMITH BARNEY SECTOR SERIES
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER>004
   <NAME>SMITH BARNEY TECHNOLOGY FUND

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              8 Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   OCT-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                        OCT-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>              215,509,075
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>             185,478,850
<RECEIVABLES>                        4,260,885
<ASSETS-OTHER>                               0
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                       837
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     189,740,572
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>               770,509
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                      0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                    0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                    770,509
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                              0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>           234,543,927
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                8,162,215
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                        0
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                    0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>              (2,200,142)
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>            (13,908,721)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                     0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>           (30,030,225)
<NET-ASSETS>                       188,404,839
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                       94,516
<INTEREST-INCOME>                      146,462
<OTHER-INCOME>                               0
<EXPENSES-NET>                       2,441,120
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>             (2,200,142)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>           (13,908,721)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>          (30,030,225)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>              (46,139,088)
<EQUALIZATION>                               0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                    0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                     0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                        0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>            258,490,217
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>        (23,946,290)
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                          0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>             188,404,839
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                      0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                    0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                      0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                   0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                1,106,818
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                      2,537,514
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                69,462,090
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                    11.40
<PER-SHARE-NII>                          (0.12)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                   0.00
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                      0.00
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                 0.00
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                      0.00
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                       9.09
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                           2.25
[AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING]                       0
[AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE]                         0



</TABLE>
Amendment to Stock Purchase Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.1 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT 
  
 THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is dated as of the 16th day of January, 2004, and is by and between American Access Technologies, Inc. a Florida corporation (the
“Company”), and Around the Clock Partners, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “Investor”). 
  
 W I T N E S S E T H: 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Investor entered into that certain Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of the 2nd day of December, 2003 (the “Agreement”); and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Initial Closing under the Agreement has occurred; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Investor desire to amend the Agreement to shorten one of the dates applicable to the
Second Additional Closing. 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the mutual covenants contained in this Amendment and the Agreement, the Company and the Investor agree as follows: 
  
 1. Definitions. Capitalized terms used in this Amendment and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings given to them in the
Agreement. 
  
 2. Amendment of Agreement.
From and after the effective date of this Amendment, Section 1.4 of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the reference contained therein to “ten (10) business days” and replacing the same with “five (5) days”.

  
 3. Integration of Amendment and
Agreement. From and after the effective date above, the Agreement and this Amendment shall be read as one agreement. Except as set forth in this Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement are not being modified or amended,
and shall remain in full force and effect. 
  
 IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Agreement to be duly executed by its authorized representative and the Investor has caused this Agreement to be executed by its authorized representative. 
  

			
	AMERICAN ACCESS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/John Presley
	 	 	

	 	 	 John Presley
 President

	
	AROUND THE CLOCK PARTNERS, LP
		
	By:	 	Around the Clock Trading and Capital Management, LLC,
	 	 	

	 	 	 General Partner

		
	By:	 	/s/ Wayne Anderson
	 	 	

	 	 	 Wayne Anderson
 Managing Member
David D. PETERSON, Petitioner v. LINEAR CONTROLS, INC.

No. 18-1401

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
Glen T. JONES, Jr., Petitioner v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 19-6073

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 114 (Tuesday, June 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 35981]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12735]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

[Docket No. 22-14]


MSRF, Inc., Complainant v. HMM Company Limited, and Yang Ming 
Marine Transport Corporation, Respondents; Notice of Filing of 
Complaint and Assignment

Served: June 8, 2022.
    Notice is given that a complaint has been filed with the Federal 
Maritime Commission (Commission) by MSRF, Inc. (MSRF), hereinafter 
``Complainant'', against HMM Company Limited (HMM) and Yang Ming Marine 
Transport Corporation (Yang Ming), hereinafter ``Respondents''. 
Complainant alleges that Respondents are ocean common carriers 
organized under the laws of the Republic of Korea and Taiwan, 
respectively.
    Complainant alleges that Respondents violated 46 U.S.C. 41102(c), 
41104(a)(2), 41104(a)(5), 41104(a)(9), and 41104 (a)(10). The full text 
of the complaint can be found in the Commission's Electronic Reading 
Room at https://www2.fmc.gov/readingroom/proceeding/22-14/.
    This proceeding has been assigned to Office of Administrative Law 
Judges. The initial decision of the presiding officer in this 
proceeding shall be issued by June 8, 2023, and the final decision of 
the Commission shall be issued by December 22, 2023.

William Cody,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-12735 Filed 6-13-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-02-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Crossmann Communities, Inc.
Exhibit 27.1
Article 5 Financial Date Schedule for 1998 10-Q
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         4278853
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  205531904
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         6894426
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3014697
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               260561194
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                       98175817
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      64471930
<OTHER-SE>                                    72960328
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 260561194
<SALES>                                      264366387
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             264366387
<CGS>                                        208316424
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                208316424
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              964135
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               29371662
<INCOME-TAX>                                  11665576
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           17706086
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  17706086
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.53
        

</TABLE>
Robert L. SWINTON, Jr., Petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 19-7625.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District denied.
David R. URIBE, Petitioner v. Ralph DIAZ, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

No. 19-5144

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Benjamin CARPENTER, Petitioner v. GEORGIA.

No. 19-5910

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

*477Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.
# C_2018290EN.01000102.xml

| 17.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 290/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 290/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8961 — HPS/MDP/PFP)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 290/02)

On 12 June 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8961. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8961. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1152
JANET GRANOFSKY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BALTIMORE GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY; ASPLUNDH TREE EXPERT COMPANY, Defendants - Appellees, and BF&M TEMPORARIES, Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. M. J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-93- 4175-MJG) Submitted: May 1, 1997 Decided: May 8, 1997 Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Janet Granofsky, Appellant Pro Se. Luther Ellis Justis, Jr., BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, Baltimore, Maryland; Mark D.Laponsky, Willis Gunther Ferlise, SEMMES, BOWEN & SEMMES, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.23 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's orders granting the Appellees' motions for summary judgment on Appellant's complaint,which alleged sexual harassment, gender discrimination, and retaliatory discharge from her employment. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Granofsky v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. , No. CA-93-4175- MJG (D. Md. June 10 and Apr. 1, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2018214EN.01000101.xml

| 19.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 214/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 214/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8725 — Nufarm/Century)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 214/01)

On 6 March 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8725. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8725. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund V L.P. (the "Fund") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the Fund's general partner, Boston Capital Associates V L.L.C., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                  
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.



|                  |  |                            
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:             |  |                            
|November 15, 2010 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  | Marc N. Teal               
|                  |  | Principal Financial Officer
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  |                            



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2018332EN.01000201.xml

| 19.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 332/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 332/2

---

Withdrawal of notification of a concentration

(Case M.8854 — Norsk Hydro/Rio Tinto Assets)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 332/03)

On 17 August 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration between Norsk Hydro and Rio Tinto Assets. On 14 September 2018, the notifying party informed the Commission that it withdrew its notification.

---
[Cite as Geauga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Patterson , 127 Ohio St.3d 1270, 2010-Ohio-6594.]

G EAUGA C OUNTY B AR A SSOCIATION v . P ATTERSON . [Cite as Geauga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Patterson, 127 Ohio St.3d 1270, 2010-Ohio-6594.] (No. 2009-1509 — Submitted December 21, 2010 — Decided December 28, 2010.)
O N A PPLICATION FOR R EINSTATEMENT

.

__________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by res pondent, David Nelson Patterson, Attorney Registration No. 0015280, last known busin ess address in Willoughby, Ohio. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of December 2, 2009, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of 18 months with the last six months stayed on the condition that respondent commit no further misconduct, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore, {¶ 3} It is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V( 8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Geauga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Patterson , 124 Ohio St.3d 93, 2009-Ohio-6166, 919 N.E.2d 206.
B ROWN , C.J., and P FEIFER , L UNDBERG S TRATTON , O’C ONNOR , O’D ONNELL , L ANZINGER , and C UPP , JJ., concur.

______________________
BP P.L.C., et al., Applicants v. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE

No. 19A368

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 22, 2019

Application for stay presented to The Chief Justice and by him referred to the Court denied.

Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.