alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 127 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 127

    Declaring that a state of war exists between the self-described 
 ``Islamic State'' and its direct affiliates and subsidiaries, and the 
Government and the people of the United States and making provisions to 
                          prosecute the same.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 18, 2014

  Mr. Gohmert (for himself, Mrs. Bachmann, Mr. Salmon, Mr. Gosar, Mr. 
 Barton, Mr. Harris, and Mr. Weber of Texas) introduced the following 
   joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Declaring that a state of war exists between the self-described 
 ``Islamic State'' and its direct affiliates and subsidiaries, and the 
Government and the people of the United States and making provisions to 
                          prosecute the same.

Whereas the self-described ``Islamic State'' has committed unprovoked acts of 
        war against the Government and the people of the United States of 
        America: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the state of war between 
the United States and the self-described ``Islamic State'' and its 
direct affiliates and subsidiaries, which has thus been thrust upon the 
United States, is hereby formally declared; and the President is hereby 
authorized and directed to use all necessary and appropriate force to 
carry on war against the self-described ``Islamic State'' and its 
direct affiliates and subsidiaries; and all the resources of the 
country are hereby pledged by the Congress of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/29/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       79,330
COMMITMENTS
   1,167   11,815    3,124   75,039   64,211   79,330   79,150        0      180

CHANGES FROM 04/22/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      5,925)
      94   -1,401      370    5,711    7,006    6,175    5,975     -250      -50

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     1.5     14.9      3.9     94.6     80.9    100.0     99.8      0.0      0.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       34)
       3        8        5       16       20       22       30`

---

Updated May 2, 2014
Angel Mesa MADUENO, Petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 19-5731

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District denied.
January 3, 2001


Securities and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street
Washington, D.C. 20549

Attn:	Office of Filings, Information and Consumer Services

Re:	Smith Barney Aggressive Growth Fund. (the "Fund")
	Post-Effective Amendment No. 24
	File Nos. 2-84199 and 811-3762

Dear Sirs:

Pursuant to Rule 497(j) under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, please accept this letter as certification that the
statement of additional information and the prospectus of the
Fund do not differ from those contained in the Post-
Effective Amendment No. 24 filed on December 27, 2000.


Please return an electronic transmittal as evidence of your
receipt of this filing.

Very truly yours,


/s/ Robert Nelson
Robert Nelson
Assistant Secretary
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-30351

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Ivory Brandon Harris,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:06-CR-120-2

Before Davis, Stewart, and Dennis, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Ivory Brandon Harris appeals the district court’s order denying his 

motion for resentencing pursuant to Section 404 of the First Step Act of 

2018. He asserts that the district court failed to conduct an individualized 

assessment of the statutory sentencing factors and failed to adequately 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 24, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-30351 Document: 00515755587 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/24/2021
No. 20-30351

2

explain its reasons for denying a sentence reduction. No abuse of discretion 

has been shown. See United States v. Batiste, 980 F.3d 466, 477-79 (5th Cir. 

2020). Harris also asserts that the district court’s decision was substantively 

unreasonable. As he now concedes, this question is foreclosed. Seeid. at 479-

80. The district court’s order is AFFIRMED.

Case: 20-30351 Document: 00515755587 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/24/2021
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 24 - 0054 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. THOMAS CURRAN

Defendant and Appellant .

**G RANT**  Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until April 8 , 2024 to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court March 4 2024

03/04/2024
Case Number: DA 24-0054
Gerald NELSON, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 19-6338.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Nov. 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Paul Anthony VALDERAS, Petitioner, v. CITY OF LUBBOCK, Texas, et al.

No. 19-222

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 14, 2017

No. 04

- 17

- 00369

- CV

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO

, Appellant

v.

John AGUERO

, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 388746

Honorable Timothy Jo hnson, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The notification of late record filed by Herminia Torres is hereby NOTED. Time is

extended to July 23, 2017.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand an d affixed the seal of the said

court on this 14th day of July, 2017

.

___________________________________ Luz Estrada

Chief Deputy Clerk
Vernon Wayne MCNEAL, Petitioner, v. A. ERVIN, et al.

No. 19-7787.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# C_2018001EN.01000301.xml

| 4.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 1/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 1/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8719 — Kyocera/Ryobi/Ryobi Dalian Machinery/Ryobi Sales/Kyocera Industrial Tools)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 1/05)

On 20 December 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8719. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8719. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
IN RE Aretha TOWNSEND, Petitioner.

No. 19-7938.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
ex4-5a.htm


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Annual Report for Rainchief Energy Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report), the undersigned, Paul E. Heney, Chief Executive Officer do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:








	
(1) 

	
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and













	
(2) 

	
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, theFinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.







 



 


May 1, 2012




By:







/s/ Paul E. Heney


Paul E. Heney


Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
Enlighten Software Solutions, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement
(No.33-73588) on Form S-8 of Enlighten Software Solutions, Inc. of our report
dated February 4, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Enlighten
Software Solutions, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and
cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31,
1999,which report appears in the December 31, 1999, annual report on Form 10-KSB
of Enlighten Software Solutions, Inc.

                                                          /s/ KPMG LLP
Mountain View, California
March 27, 2000
IN RE Carl A. COURTRIGHT, III, Petitioner

No. 19-5364

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
**Exhibit 31(a)****CERTIFICATIONS****Certification of Principal Executive Officer**I, John C. Plant, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (this “Report”) of TRW Automotive HoldingsCorp. (the “Registrant”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this Report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisReport; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this Report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Reportbased on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.   Date: November 1, 2005 /s/ JOHN C. PLANT John C. Plant
320211796.1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

SIGNODE INDUSTRIAL GROUP LLC, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

SAMUEL, SON & CO., LTD., ET AL. 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 2:24-CV-00080-JRG 

DECLARATION OF DEVON C BEANE IN SUPPORT OF SIGNODE INDUSTRIAL 

GROUP LLC’S OPPOSITION TO SAMUEL’S MOTION TO TRANSFER PURSUANT TO 

28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) 

Case 2:24-cv-00080-JRG Document 46-2 Filed 09/04/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 814
320211796.1 

1 

I, Devon C. Beane, declare: 

1. I am a Partner with the law firm of K&L Gates LLP, and I am counsel of record for 

Plaintiff Signode Industrial Group LLC (“Signode”) in the above-captioned matter. I am submitting 

this declaration in support of Signode’s Opposition To Samuel’s Motion To Transfer Pursuant To 

28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). I have personal knowledge of the matters stated herein and, if called to testify 

to such matters, I could and would testify hereto. 

2. Attached as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of a picture of the shipping label 

on the shipping container, in which, the STL-500 was shipped to 110 North College Ave., Tyler, 

TX 75702, which is located in the District. 

3. Attached as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of excepts from Samuel’s 

Objections and Responses to Signode Industrial Group LLC’s First Set of Interrogatories 1-8. 

4. Attached as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of driving instructions from 

Signode’s Tampa Headquarters to the Sam B. Hall Jr. Federal Building and United States 

Courthouse as generated by Google Maps. 

5. Attached as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of driving instructions from 

Signode’s Tampa Headquarters to the Dirksen Federal Building located in Chicago, IL as 

generated by Google Maps. 

6. Attached as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of statistics concerning patent cases 

in the Eastern District of Texas as generated by Lex Machina on September 1, 2024. 

7. Attached as Exhibit F is a true and correct copy of statistics concerning patent cases 

in the Northern District of Illinois as generated by Lex Machina on September 1, 2024. 

8. Attached as Exhibit G is a true and correct copy of Signode’s First Amended Initial 

and Additional Disclosures. 

Case 2:24-cv-00080-JRG Document 46-2 Filed 09/04/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 815
320211796.1 

2 

I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing 

statements are true and correct. Signed this 4th day of September, 2024. 

/s/ Devon C. Beane 

Devon C. Beane 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was filed electronically in 

compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a) and served via electronic mail on all counsel of record on 

this 4th day of September, 2024. 

/s/ Devon C. Beane 

Devon C. Beane 

Case 2:24-cv-00080-JRG Document 46-2 Filed 09/04/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 816
Scott L. RENDELMAN, Petitioner, v. William TRUE, Warden.

No. 19-7922.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and the petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petition in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin* v. *District of Columbia Court of Appeals* , 506 U.S. 1 (1992) (*per curiam* ).
Scott PETERS, Petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 18-9706

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
IN RE Phillip S. GRIGALANZ, Petitioner

No. 18-9334

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Damon BENTLEY, Petitioner v. Connie HORTON, Warden.

No. 19-5894

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 12, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
SMITH BARNEY CONCERT SERIES INC.
(the "Fund")



Supplement dated December 31, 1996 to Prospectuses*



For South Dakota Investors:

	CLASS Y SHARES OF THE FUND ARE NOT
AVAILABLE FOR PURCHASE BY RESIDENTS OF SOUTH
DAKOTA.

_________________________________
* Prospectuses dated:  	August 5, 1996
			August 5, 1996, as supplemented September 16, 1996 (PFS 
Distributors, Inc.)


FD 01247
# C_2018280EN.01000101.xml

| 9.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 280/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 280/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9009 — KKR/Casual Dining Bidco)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 280/01)

On 27 July 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9009. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9009. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Marcos Robert CASTANEDA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7981.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 4, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
IN RE Lorcan KILROY, Petitioner.

No. 18-9663

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. petitioner allowed until October 28, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and AIDS Initial Review Group Microbiology and Infectious Diseases B Research Study Section Microbiology and Infectious Diseases B Subcommittee.                    

*Date:*                         June 28-29, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3F30, Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Mario Cerritelli, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3F58, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-669-5199,                         *cerritem@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 1, 2022.

Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-12173 Filed 6-6-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P