alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000882300
<NAME> SMITH BARNEY INTERMEDIATE MUNICIPAL FUND,INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                       81,470,254
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                      87,404,046
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,421,443
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                       0
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              88,825,489
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                             0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                      433,173
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                            433,173
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                      0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                    82,899,416
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                        8,288,885
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                        8,288,885
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                      156,727
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                              0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                     (597,619)
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                     5,933,792
<NET-ASSETS>                                88,392,316
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                                    0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                            5,466,540
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                                 622,826
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                      4,843,714
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                       (1,944)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                    6,029,456
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                       10,871,226
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                  (4,973,331)
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                              0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                          0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                                  0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>
286,344 <ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                    0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>
(595,675) <GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>
517,473 <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>
622,826 <AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>
86,041,211 <PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>
9.95 <PER-SHARE-NII>
0.58 <PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>
0.73 <PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                            0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>
(0.60) <RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                          0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>
10.66 <EXPENSE-RATIO>
0.72 <AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>                          0
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>                                 0
        


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Almeido Santiago, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Trial Term, New York County,

December 3, 1971.

*11
      *Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney,*for plaintiff. *Ronald H. McKie*for defendant.

Johh M. Murtagh, J.

Defendant’s omnibus motion is disposed of as hereinafter indicated.

That branch of the motion requesting a suppression hearing is respectfully referred to the trial court.

The defendant, a taxicab driver, was arrested on or about February 7, 1971 and charged with the crime of criminal possession of a dangerous weapon as a felony. On April 28, 1971 the defendant was indicted and charged with the above-mentioned crime.

The defendant moves to inspect the Grand Jury minutes and/or in the alternative for a dismissal of the indictment.

The court has read the Grand Jury minutes. It does not appear that the evidence submitted establishes the commission of a felony under subdivision 2 of section 265.05 of the Penal Law.

Subdivision 2 of section 265.05 provides that “ Such possession [possession of a firearm] shall not * * ***constitute a felony

if such possession takes place in such person’s home or place of business.” It is evident that the Legislature intended to classify possession in a home or place of business a lesser degree of crime than one that takes place elsewhere. The policy behind such special classification is evident.

We have in this case possession of a .38 automatic Beretta in a cigar box used to keep the day’s receipts, the cigar box being in a taxicab assigned to the defendant for his daily business use. There is no precedent to guide the court. Nonetheless, it appears evident that within the letter and spirit of subdivision 2 of section 265.05 the possession is a possession in a “ place of business.”

Accordingly, defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment is granted.
Noel L. SMITH, Petitioner v. Diane Smith CARUSOS

No. 19-226

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 21, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, NOTES, THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-1997 
<PERIOD-END>                                                JUN-30-1997 
<CASH>                                                            1,435
<SECURITIES>                                                          0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    11,924 
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        357 
<INVENTORY>                                                           0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 18,206 
<PP&E>                                                            1,905 
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      185 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   39,459 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            19,108 
<BONDS>                                                               0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0 
<PREFERRED>                                                       5,000 
<COMMON>                                                             88 
<OTHER-SE>                                                       15,164 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     39,459 
<SALES>                                                          19,513
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 19,513 
<CGS>                                                            14,958 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    18,575 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    (86)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  164 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     852 
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        422 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 430 
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0 
<CHANGES>                                                             0 
<NET-INCOME>                                                        430 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                      0.04 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      0.00 
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 64 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 64

    Supporting the goals and ideals of suicide prevention awareness.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 14, 2013

 Mrs. Beatty (for herself, Mr. Ryan of Ohio, Ms. Norton, Mr. Ellison, 
  Mr. Grijalva, and Ms. Bordallo) submitted the following concurrent 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
    Supporting the goals and ideals of suicide prevention awareness.

Whereas suicide is the tenth leading cause of all deaths in the United States 
        and the second leading cause of death among individuals between the ages 
        of 10 and 34;
Whereas, on average, there is a death by suicide in the United States every 13.7 
        minutes;
Whereas an estimated 6,000,000 individuals in the United States are survivors of 
        suicide, meaning they have lost a loved one to suicide;
Whereas suicide is a leading noncombat cause of death among members of the Armed 
        Forces;
Whereas, on average, 22 veterans are lost to suicide in the United States each 
        day;
Whereas the Joshua Omvig Veterans Suicide Prevention Act (Public Law 110-110; 
        121 Stat. 1031) was enacted in 2007 to establish a comprehensive program 
        for suicide prevention among veterans;
Whereas the Veterans Crisis Line, which was established under the Joshua Omvig 
        Veteran Suicide Prevention Act, has received more than 890,000 telephone 
        calls and facilitated more than 30,000 life-saving rescues;
Whereas the stigma associated with mental illness and suicidality works against 
        suicide prevention by discouraging individuals at risk of suicide from 
        seeking life-saving help and further traumatizes survivors of suicide;
Whereas 90 percent of the individuals who die by suicide have a diagnosable 
        psychiatric disorder at the time of death;
Whereas many suicides are preventable; and
Whereas September is National Suicide Prevention Awareness Month: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of National Suicide 
        Prevention Awareness Month;
            (2) supports efforts during National Suicide Prevention 
        Awareness Month to raise awareness and improve outreach to 
        individuals at risk for suicide, especially such efforts 
        addressed to veterans and members of the Armed Forces; and
            (3) encourages the people of the United States to learn 
        more about the warning signs of suicide and how each person can 
        help prevent suicide and promote mental health.
                                 <all>
```
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
EARLENE JOHNSON, Petitioner

,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF VETERA NS AFFAIRS, Respondent

.

______________________

2014

- 3076

______________________
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. CH

- 1221

- 11

- 0328 -W- 1.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Earlene Johnson moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

Upon consideration thereof,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : The motion is granted. Case: 14-3076 Document: 7 Page: 1 Filed: 04/01/2014JOHNSON v. DVA 2

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s24 Case: 14-3076 Document: 7 Page: 2 Filed: 04/01/2014
Carol WILDING, et al., Petitioners, v. DNC SERVICES CORPORATION, et al.

No. 19-1185.

Supreme Court of the United States.

June 1, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
William T. SCHMITT, et al., Petitioners, v. Frank LAROSE, Ohio Secretary of State.

No. 19-974.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 26, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000089558
<NAME> SMITH BARNEY APPRECIATION GROWTH FUND INC. - CLASS Z

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                    3,848,429,517
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                   5,608,832,798
<RECEIVABLES>                               31,102,715
<ASSETS-OTHER>                             577,576,527
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           6,217,512,040
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                    20,898,204
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                  587,617,483
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                        608,515,687
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                      0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                 3,659,597,851
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                       17,038,424
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                       15,931,792
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                      675,106
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                    188,320,115
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                 1,760,403,281
<NET-ASSETS>                             5,608,996,353
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                           52,974,530
<INTEREST-INCOME>                           46,144,932
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                              61,420,472
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                     37,698,990
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                   597,948,936
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                   89,842,578
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                      725,490,540
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                    3,298,766
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                    26,480,501
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                      1,127,436
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                  1,934,377
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                          1,913,573
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                     683,031,590
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                        (9,654)
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                (141,482,128)
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                       29,764,149
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                             61,420,472
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                       258,637,868
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                            15.29
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                   0.21
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                           2.08
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                              0.00
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                         1.87
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                              0.00
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                              15.71
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                   0.58


</TABLE>
Report of Independent Accountants

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Salomon Brothers Investors Value Fund Inc


In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements of Salomon
Brothers Investors Value Fund Inc (the "Fund") for the year ended December
31, 2000 we considered its internal control, including control activities
for safeguarding securities, in order to determine our auditing procedures
for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and to
comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on
internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and maintaining
internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and
judgments by management are required to assess the expected benefits and
related costs of controls.  Generally, controls that are relevant to an
audit pertain to the entity's objective of preparing financial statements
for external purposes that are fairly presented in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.  Those controls include the safeguarding of
assets against unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition.
Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or fraud may
occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any evaluation of internal
control to future periods is subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of
their design and operation may deteriorate.
Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily disclose all
matters in internal control that might be material weaknesses under
standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants.  A material weakness is a condition in which the design or
operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce
to a relatively low level the risk that misstatements caused by error or
fraud in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial
statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely
period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned
functions.  However, we noted no matters involving internal control and its
operation, including controls for safeguarding securities, that we consider
to be material weaknesses as defined above as of December 31, 2000.
This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Board of
Directors, management and the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not
intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified
parties.


February 20, 2001
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Salomon Brothers Investors Value Fund Inc

	(2)
AO 120 (Rev. 08/10) 

TO: Mail Stop 8

Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

P.O. Box 1450

Alexandria, VA 22313-1450

REPORT ON THE

FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN

ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR

TRADEMARK

In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been

filed in the U.S. District Court on the following

G Trademarks or G Patents. ( G the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):

DOCKET NO. DATE FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT

PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:

DATE INCLUDED INCLUDED BY

G Amendment G Answer G Cross Bill G Other Pleading

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:

DECISION/JUDGEMENT

CLERK (BY) DEPUTY CLERK DATE

Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director

Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy

Case 2:23-cv-00485-JRG Document 2 Filed 10/17/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 70

Eastern District of Texas ✔

2:23-cv-00485 10/17/2023 Eastern District of Texas

REDSTONE LOGICS LLC SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and SAMSUNG 

ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.

8,549,339 10/1/2013 REDSTONE LOGICS LLC 9,253,925 2/2/2016 REDSTONE LOGICS LLC

Order Dismissing Case 

Print Save As... Reset

10/10/2024

Case 2:23-cv-00485-JRG Document 42 Filed 10/10/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 285
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

              Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings
                      (In millions, except per share amounts )

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               Quarter Ended March 31,
                                                            -------------------------------
                                                                2000             1999
                                                            --------------   --------------
<S>                                                          <C>               <C>
Net income                                                    $ 57.9           $ 35.0


Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during each year - basic                            91.4             94.0

Weighted average number of common shares
and common stock equivalents outstanding during
each year -  diluted                                            92.5             96.4
                                                       --------------   --------------


Basic earnings per  share                                     $ 0.63           $ 0.37
                                                       --------------   --------------


Diluted earnings per share                                    $ 0.63           $ 0.36
                                                       --------------   --------------

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

RICHARD EDWARDS §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23cv443

BEAUMONT BONE AND JOINT, ET AL. §

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Richard Edwards, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit. The Court referred this

matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States Magistrate Judge. The Magistrate Judge

has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge recommending the

case be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States 

Magistrate Judge, along with the record and pleadings. Proper notice was given to plaintiff at his

last know address. See FED. R. CIV. P. 5(b)(2). No objections were filed to the Report and

Recommendation.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct

and the report of the Magistrate Judge [Dkt. 4] is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. A final

judgment shall be entered in accordance with the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

 

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 7th day of February, 2024.

Case 1:23-cv-00443-MJT-CLS Document 6 Filed 02/07/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 16
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1093 

To direct the Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation Security Administration) to prohibit airplane passengers from bringing aboard 

a passenger aircraft any item that was prohibited as of March 1, 2013. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 12, 2013 

Mr. MARKEY (for himself, Mr. GRIMM, Mr. TONKO, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. 

LYNCH, and Mr. NADLER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To direct the Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security 

(Transportation Security Administration) to prohibit airplane passengers from bringing aboard a passenger aircraft any item that was prohibited as of March 1, 2013. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Knives Act of 

5 2013’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1093 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO PROHIBIT ITEMS ON PASSENGER 

2 AIRPLANES. 

3 The Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security 

4 (Transportation Security Administration) shall prohibit 

5 carriage aboard a passenger aircraft operated by an air 

6 carrier or foreign air carrier in air transportation or intra7 state air transportation of any item that was prohibited 

8 from being carried aboard such an aircraft on March 1, 

9 2013. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS