alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 114 (Tuesday, June 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 36003]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12808]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION

[NARA-22-0012; NARA-2022-053]


Records Schedules; Administrative Correction Notice

AGENCY: National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).

ACTION: Notice; administrative correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kimberly Richardson, Regulatory and 
External Policy Program Manager, by email at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a1d3c4c6d4cdc0d5c8cecffec2ceccccc4cfd5d2e1cfc0d3c08fc6ced7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d4a6b1b3a1b8b5a0bdbbba8bb7bbb9b9b1baa0a794bab5a6b5fab3bba2">[email protected]</span></a>. For information about records schedules, 
contact Records Management Operations by email at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#89fbecf8fcecfafda7faeae1ecedfce5ecc9e7e8fbe8a7eee6ff"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f280978387978186dc81919a9796879e97b29c938093dc959d84">[email protected]</span></a> or by phone at 301-837-1799.
SUMMARY: We published records schedules (NARA-22-0012; NARA 2022-053) 
in the Federal Register on June 9, 2022, and requested comments by the 
due date, June 8, 2022, in error. We are correcting the due date for 
comments.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    In the Federal Register of June 9, 2022, in FR Doc. Vol 87, No.111, 
on page 35249, in the first column, correct the DATES caption to read:

DATES: 
    We must receive responses on the schedules listed in this notice by 
July 25, 2022.

Laurence Brewer,
Chief Records Officer for the U.S. Government.
[FR Doc. 2022-12808 Filed 6-13-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Omar Christopher MILLER, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 18-8826

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

*394Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018321EN.01000801.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 11.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 321/8 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.8991 — Alphabet/ResMed/JV)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 321/06)

1.

On 4 September 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018321EN.01000801-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Verily Life Sciences LLC (‘Verily’, United States), belonging to Alphabet Inc. (‘Alphabet’, United States), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | ResMed Inc. (‘ResMed’, United States). |

ResMed and Verily acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of a newly created joint venture that will study the health and financial impacts of undiagnosed and untreated sleep apnea and other breathing related sleep disorders, and develop software solutions that enable health care providers to more efficiently identify, diagnose, treat and manage individuals with sleep apnea and other breathing related sleep disorders.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Verily: research organisation, formerly Google Life Sciences. Google is the largest business controlled by Alphabet,

—   for ResMed: development, manufacturing, distribution and marketing of medical devices and cloud-based software applications that diagnose, treat and manage respiratory disorders and other chronic diseases.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018321EN.01000801-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.8991 — Alphabet/ResMed/JV

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018321EN.01000801-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018321EN.01000801-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 0 8

- 3 0 8 2 7 C o n f e r e n c e C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A ,
P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v
. S T E P H E N A C O L L I N S ,
D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e W e s t e r n D i s t r i c t o f L o u i s i a n a U S D C N o
. 3 : 0 6

- C R

- 3 0 0 0 3

- 1

B e f o r e S M I T H , P R A D O , a n d H A Y N E S , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : *
S t e p h e n A

. C o l l i n s , f e d e r a l p r i s o n e r # 1 3 5 0 5 5

- 0 3 5 , a p p e a l s t h e d i s t r i c t

c o u r t ’ s r u l i n g t h a t h e w a s i n e l i g i b l e f o r a r e d u c t i o n i n s e n t e n c e p u r s u a n t t o 1 8 U

. S

. C

. § 3 5 8 2 ( c ) ( 2 ) b a s e d o n t h e a m e n d m e n t s t o t h e c r a c k c o c a i n e G u i d e l i n e
. A l t h o u g h C o l l i n s a r g u e s t h a t h e w a s e l i g i b l e f o r s u c h a r e d u c t i o n , w h e n a d e f e n d a n t s u c h a s C o l l i n s i s “ s u b j e c t t o a s t a t u t o r y m i n i m u m s e n t e n c e a b o v e t h e

u p p e r e n d o f

h i s g u i d e l i n e r a n g e , e v e n i f t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t d e p a r t s d o w n w a r d l y f r o m t h a t m i n i m u m u n d e r a s t a t u t o r y e x c e p t i o n , 1 8 U

. S

. C

. § 3 5 8 2 ( c ) ( 2 ) p r o v i d e s U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D April 20 , 20 10 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 08-30827 Document: 00511085456 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2010N o
. 0 8

- 3 0 8 2 7

n o a u t h o r i t y t o t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t t o l a t e r m o d i f y t h e s e n t e n c e b a s e d o n

a m e n d m e n t s t o t h e g u i d e l i n e r a n g e
. ” U n i t e d S t a t e s v
. C a r t e r , 5 9 5 F

. 3 d 5 7 5 , 5 8 1 ( 5 t h C i r
. 2 0 1 0 )

. A F F I R M E D

.

2 Case: 08-30827 Document: 00511085456 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/20/2010
In the Matter of DISCIPLINE OF Ben Elton BRUNER.

No. D-3053.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 23, 2019.

Ben Elton Bruner, of Opelika, Alabama, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       2,235,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,140,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   106,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,572,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,896,000
<PP&E>                                       4,423,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,008,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,717,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,344,000
<BONDS>                                        276,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        84,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,013,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,717,000
<SALES>                                      6,996,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,399,000
<CGS>                                        4,124,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,204,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (8,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     2
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             222,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,813,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,813,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,813,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.21)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned, Scott M. Miller, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Melt Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Melt Inc. for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Melt Inc.

 

Dated:  March 29, 2007

 

 

/s/ Scott M. Miller                                                                                      

Scott M. Miller

Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President

(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Melt Inc. and will be retained by Melt Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
John Wayne SCANTLEBURY, et al., Petitioners v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-528

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.


# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

IN RE BERTRAND MARC

____________________

2010-1540 (Serial No. 10/468,449)

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

J EFFREY M. G OEHRING , Young & Thompson, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for the appellant. With him

on the brief was Andrew J. Patch.

J OSEPH G. P ICCOLO , Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitors, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia argued for appellee. With him on

the brief were R AYMOND T. C HEN , Solicitor, and B RIAN T.

R ACILLA , Associate Solicitor.

______________________T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (L INN

, C LEVENGER , and M OORE

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

May 12, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, Petitioner v. ERFINDERGEMEINSCHAFT UROPEP GBR

No. 18-1515

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 21, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32(b)** **CERTIFICATION    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED    PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF    2002**     In connection with the filing of this quarterly report on    Form 10-Q    of TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. (the “Company”) for    the period ended June 29, 2007, with the Securities and    Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the    “Report”), I, Joseph S. Cantie, Chief Financial    Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.    Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of    the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and     2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,    in all material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of the Company. /s/  JOSEPH    S. CANTIE    Joseph S. Cantie*Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer    (Principal Financial Officer)*     Date: August 1, 2007
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of King
Capital Holdings, Inc., for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2004, I, Sean King,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of King Capital Holdings,
Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

     1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September
          30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the period ended September 30, 2004, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of King
          Capital Holdings, Inc.

Dated:  November 15, 2004

KING CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC.


By: /s/ Sean King
-------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         148,637
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,383
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,253
<INVENTORY>                                     41,654
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               221,643
<PP&E>                                         349,186
<DEPRECIATION>                                 132,979
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 493,123
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          131,504
<BONDS>                                        983,611
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           19,500
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           646
<OTHER-SE>                                   (844,916)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   493,123
<SALES>                                        446,001
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               446,001
<CGS>                                          238,517
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  193,740
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,618
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              63,978
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (51,852)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        30
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (51,882)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (51,882)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.83)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.83)
        

</TABLE>
John STANCU, Petitioner, v. HYATT CORPORATION.

No. 19-8156.

Supreme Court of the United States.

June 1, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied. Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Russell Rafael WHITEHEAD, Petitioner v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-9350

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 4.2

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 2
                                       TO
                          CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT

      THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT,  dated January 13,
2004 (the "Second  Amendment"),  is by and among Cambridge Securities Group (the
"Consultant"), and Dtomi, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Client").

                                    RECITALS

      A. The  Consultant  and the  Client  entered  into a  Consulting  Services
Agreement dated September 5, 2003, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit
A (the "Agreement"),  pursuant to which the Consultant agreed to provide certain
consulting services to the Client.

      B.  Client  and  Consultant  wish  to  amend  Sections  2 and  6(a) of the
Agreement to extend the  duration of the  Agreement  and provide for  additional
consideration in exchange for additional consulting services.

                                    AGREEMENT

      NOW,  THEREFORE,  in  consideration  of  the  foregoing,  and  the  mutual
agreements, representations,  warranties and covenants contained herein, and for
other  good  and  valuable   consideration   the  receipt  of  which  is  hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

A.    Section 2 of the Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and shall read
      as follows:

"2. Consideration.

Client agrees to pay Consultant,  as his fee and as  consideration  for services
provided,  Six  Hundred  Thousand  (1,400,000)  shares  of  common  stock of the
Client."

B.    Section 6(a) of the  Agreement  shall be deleted in its entirety and shall
      read as follows:

"(a) Term.

This  Agreement  shall  become  effective  on the  date  appearing  next  to the
signatures  below and  terminate  Twenty  Four (24)  months  thereafter.  Unless
otherwise agreed upon in writing by Consultant and Client,  this Agreement shall
not automatically be renewed beyond its Term."

EXECUTED on the date first set forth above.

                                        CLIENT:

                                        DTOMI, INC.


                                        By:_____________________________________
                                           David M. Otto - Chairman of the Board


                                       9
<PAGE>

                                        CONSULTANT:

                                        CAMBRIDGE SECURITIES GROUP


                                        By:_____________________________________
                                           Name: Barbara Lee - Secretary


                                       10
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MITZI PAPILLON

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 3092

[ January 7, 2021 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Michael A. Usan , Judge; L.T. Case No.

15015983CF10A

.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal and Civil Regional Counsel, Fourth District and Richard G. Bartmon, Assistant Regional Counsel, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance requir ed for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY
, D AMOORGIAN and G ERBER
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.