alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JOSE ANTHONY HERNANDEZ

, Appellant,

v.

REBECCA L. HEIKKA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 2820

[ October 1, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Carlos A. Rodriguez , Judge; L.T. Case No. 07

- 8440 CACE

(14)

.

Frances Guasch de la Guardia and Suzanne Aldahan of Holland &

Knight LLP, Miami, for appellant.

Kenneth D. Cooper, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C IKLIN

, F ORST and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0525

IN THE MATTER OF:

S.M.M.,

A Youth in Need of Care.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to 

produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Kim Marchwick is 

granted an extension of time to and including November 24, 2023, 

within which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on 

appeal. 

No further extensions will be granted.

The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court 

and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 2 2023

11/02/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0525
Marlon Romaine CARTER, Petitioner, v. LOUISIANA.

No. 19-5919.

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 21, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned, Scott M. Miller, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Melt Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Melt Inc. for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Melt Inc.

 

Dated:  March 29, 2007

 

 

/s/ Scott M. Miller                                                          

Scott M. Miller

Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President

(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Melt Inc. and will be retained by Melt Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Clifton A. GRANT, Petitioner, v. MTGLQ INVESTORS, L.P.

No. 19-7281.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Smith Barney Funds, Inc.:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements
of Short-Term U.S. Treasury Securities Portfolio of Smith Barney
Funds, Inc. (the "Fund") for the year ended December 31, 1997, we
considered its internal control, including control activities for
safeguarding securities, in order to determine our auditing
procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the
financial statements and to comply with the requirements of Form
N-SAR, not to provide assurance on the internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles. Those controls include the safeguarding of
assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or
irregularities may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection
of any evaluation of internal control to future periods is
subject to the risk that it may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and
operation may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in the internal control that might be
material weaknesses under standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness
is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of
the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively
low level the risk that errors or irregularities in amounts that
would be material in relation to the financial statements being
audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by
employees in the normal course of performing their assigned
functions.  However, we noted no matters involving the internal
control and its operation, including controls for safeguarding
securities that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined
above.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management, the Board of Directors of the Fund, and the
Securities and Exchange Commission.




February 10, 1998
Vivian L. RADER, et vir, Petitioners v. CITIBANK, N.A., et al.

No. 19-81

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-13-01024-CR

Style: Mario Quintanilla

v The State of Texas

Date motion filed*: February 13, 2014

Type of motion: Motion to abate appeal

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed:

If motion to extend time:

Original due date:

Number of extensions granted: Current Due date: 

Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: 

 No further extensions of time will be granted

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

Judge's signature: /s/ Sherry Radack

 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: February 25, 2014
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 4.1    
    



	NUMBER

***	 	 	 	SHARES

***
	

Incorporated Under the Laws of the State of Texas
	

Treaty Oak Bancorp, Inc.
	

The Corporation is authorized to issue 20,000,000 Common Shares—Par Value $.01 each





This
certifies that                        is the owner of            fully
paid and non-assessable shares of the above Corporation transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the
holder hereof in person or by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. 


In
Witness Whereof, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers and to be sealed with the Seal of the Corporation. 



	Dated	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	

 
 Secretary-Treasurer	
 	

 	
 	

 
 President
	

[SEAL]





The
following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations.
Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the list. 



	TEN COM	 	—	 	as tenants in common	 	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT—            Custodian            (Minor)

under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act                         (State)
	

TEN ENT	
 	

—	
 	

as tenants by the entireties	
 	

UNIF TRF MIN ACT—            Custodian            (Minor)

under                          (State) Uniform Transfer to Minors Act
	

JT TEN	
 	

—	
 	

as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common	
 	

 








	For value received, the undersigned hereby sell, assigns and transfers unto [PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY
	OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE]	 	 

	 

	PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS OF ASSIGNEE
	 






	    
	 	Shares





	represented by the within Certificate, and hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints	 	 

	Attorney to transfer the said shares on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.








	Dated,	 	 
	 	 
	

 	
 	

In presence of	
 	

 

	

 
	
 	

 











QuickLinks



Exhibit 4.1
Shavis HOLLOMAN, Petitioner, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

No. 19-7805.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 626 

Designating April 24, 2014, as ‘‘Jan Karski Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 20, 2012 

Mr. LUGAR submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating April 24, 2014, as ‘‘Jan Karski Day’’. 

Whereas Jan Karski was born on April 24, 1914, in Lodz, 

Poland; 

Whereas Jan Karski escaped the Soviet massacre in the 

Katyn forest in 1940; 

Whereas Jan Karski became a key emissary in the Polish underground resistance against Nazi occupation; 

Whereas Jan Karski chose to risk his own life by staying in 

Poland after escaping a prisoner of war camp and enduring Gestapo torture in order to provide critical intelligence to the Allied war effort and alert Allied governments about the Holocaust; 

Whereas Jan Karski provided eyewitness testimony during 

the war about the horrors in occupied Poland to British 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•SRES 626 IS 

Foreign Minister Anthony Eden and United States President Franklin Roosevelt; 

Whereas Jan Karski enrolled in Georgetown University after 

World War II and earned a doctor of philosophy in 1952; 

Whereas Jan Karski became a United States citizen and 

taught at Georgetown University for 40 years, dedicating 

the rest of his life to ensuring that the full extent of the 

Nazi atrocities are never forgotten; and 

Whereas Jan Karski was awarded the Presidential Medal of 

Freedom posthumously on May 29, 2012, one of the 

highest civilian honors in the United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates April 24, 2014, as ‘‘Jan Karski 

3 Day’’; 

4 (2) recognizes the life and legacy of Dr. Jan 

5 Karski and expresses its gratitude for his efforts in 

6 informing the free world of the atrocities committed 

7 by Nazi and totalitarian forces in Poland during 

8 World War II; 

9 (3) applauds the awarding of the Presidential 

10 Medal of Freedom to Jan Karski for his efforts dur11 ing World War II and in reaffirming the importance 

12 of the United States-Polish bilateral relationship; 

13 and 

14 (4) requests that the Secretary transmit an en15 rolled copy of this resolution to the family of Jan 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with 
3 

•SRES 626 IS 

1 Karski and to the Ambassador of Poland to the 

2 United States. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 01/21/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       46,720
COMMITMENTS
   1,365    5,412    2,815   41,874   37,798   46,054   46,025      666      695

CHANGES FROM 01/14/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -543)
     399      116     -468      160      414       91       62     -634     -605

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     2.9     11.6      6.0     89.6     80.9     98.6     98.5      1.4      1.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       40)
       5        7        5       19       21       27       30`

---

Updated January 24, 2014
Emmanuel DIAZ, Petitioner v. NEW YORK

No. 18-9359

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York denied.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Ricky Lance Miller, individually and as * From the 39th District Court

trustee for the Nannie Lou Miller Family of Haskell County

Trust, et al., Trial Court No. 11,977-A.

Vs. No. 11-16-00030-CV * June 14, 2018

Patricia Miller Laughlin, individually and * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

as trustee for the Nannie Lou Miller (Panel consists of: Willson, J.,

Trust, and Tonya Miller, individually and Bailey, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

as independent executrix of the Estate of sitting by assignment) 

Gary Bruce Miller, deceased.

This court has considered Appellants’ motion to dismiss this appeal and 

concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The costs incurred by reason of this 

appeal are taxed against the party incurring same.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018272EN.01001601.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 3.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 272/16 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9030 — IFM/FCC/Aqualia)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 272/06)

1.

On 27 July 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018272EN.01001601-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | IFM Investors Pty Ltd (‘IFM’, Australia), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas SA (‘FCC’, Spain), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | FCC Aqualia, SA (‘Aqualia’, Spain). |

IFM and FCC acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and Article 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Aqualia. The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for IFM: IFM is a global investment manager,

—   for FCC: FCC is a company with a diversified portfolio of activities; its core businesses include environmental services and water management, construction of large infrastructures, cement production, and renewable energy production,

—   for Aqualia: Aqualia is a wholly-owned subsidiary of FCC whose main activities include the provision of services for the treatment of solid and liquid waste and of drinking water, the execution and preservation of water-related civil works, and the management of the whole water cycle.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018272EN.01001601-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9030 — IFM/FCC/Aqualia

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018272EN.01001601-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018272EN.01001601-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
SOUTHERN ILLINOIS STORM SHELTERS, Petitioners, v. 4SEMO.COM, INCORPORATED.

No. 19-990.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 6, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Commerce Economic Development Administration
 AGENCY: Economic Development Administration, Department of Commerce.
 ACTION: Notice and opportunity for public comment.
 SUMMARY: The Economic Development Administration (EDA) has received petitions for certification of eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance from the firms listed below. Accordingly, EDA has initiated investigations to determine whether increased imports into the United States of articles like or directly competitive with those produced by each of the firms contributed importantly to the total or partial separation of the firms' workers, or threat thereof, and to a decrease in sales or production of each petitioning firm.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  List of Petitions Received by EDA for Certification of Eligibility To Apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance
[5/21/2022 through 6/5/2022]
Firm name
Firm address
Date accepted for
                             investigation
Product(s)American Manufacturing, Inc
2375 Dorr Street, Toledo, OH 43607
5/31/2022
The firm manufactures steel containers, racks, and pallets.Zone Enterprises, LLC
2025 South Vandeventer Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110
6/1/2022
The firm manufactures gaskets and seals made of plastic.
 Any party having a substantial interest in these proceedings may request a public hearing on the matter. A written request for a hearing must be submitted to the Trade Adjustment Assistance Division, Room 71030, Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230, no later than ten (10) calendar days following publication of this notice. These petitions are received pursuant to section 251 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. Please follow the requirements set forth in EDA's regulations at 13 CFR 315.8 for procedures to request a public hearing. The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance official number and title for the program under which these petitions are submitted is 11.313, Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms. Bryan Borlik, Director.


[FR Doc. 2022-12535 Filed 6-9-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-WH-P
Abdul MOHAMMED, Petitioner, v. DUPAGE LEGAL ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION, et al.

No. 19-8067.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Jeffrey T. MAEHR, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5151

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Exhibit 23


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-224555 and 333-224556 on Form S-8 of our reports dated February 19, 2019 , relating to (1) the combined and consolidated financial statements of nVent Electric plc and subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an emphasis of matter paragraph regarding the allocation of expenses from Pentair plc for the periods prior to April 30, 2018), and (2) the effectiveness of nVent Electric plc and subsidiaries' internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of nVent Electric plc and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2018 .


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota


March 1, 2019
IN RE Solomon ROBERTS, Petitioner.

No. 19-5382.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.
To The Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
Smith Barney Income Funds:

In planning and performing our audits of the financial
statements of the Smith Barney Convertible Fund of Smith
Barney Income Funds (the "Fund") for the year ended July 31,
1997, we considered its internal control structure,
including procedures for safeguarding securities, in order
to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of
expressing our opinion on the financial statements and to
comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide
assurance on the internal control structure.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing
and maintaining an internal control structure.  In
fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments by
management are required to assess the expected benefits and
related costs of internal control structure policies and
procedures.  Two of the objectives of an internal control
structure are to provide management with reasonable, but not
absolute, assurance that assets are safeguarded against loss
from unauthorized use or disposition and that transactions
are executed in accordance with management's authorization
and recorded properly to permit preparation of financial
statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.

Because of inherent limitations in any internal control
structure, errors or irregularities may occur and not be
detected.  Also, projection of any evaluation of the
structure to future periods is subject to the risk that it
may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or
that the effectiveness of the design and operation may
deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control structure would
not necessarily disclose all matters in the internal control
structure that might be material weaknesses under standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants.  A material weakness is a condition in which
the design or operation of the specific internal control
structure elements does not reduce to a relatively low level
the risk that errors or irregularities in amounts that would
be material in relation to the financial statements being
audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period
by employees in the normal course of performing their
assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters involving
the internal control structure, including procedures for
safeguarding securities, that we consider to be material
weaknesses as defined above as of July 31, 1997.

This report is intended solely for the information and use
of management and the Securities and Exchange Commission.




September 15, 1997