alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w29






Exhibit 10.29




Tennessee Valley Authority

Coal Supply & Origination

1101 Market Street, MR 2A

Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402-2801




CONTRACT SUPPLEMENT




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 

	TO: Armstrong Coal Company, Inc.

	 	Supplement No.
	 	5	 	 
	       7701
Forsyth Boulevard - 10th Floor

	 	Date
	 	December 28, 2011

	       St.
Louis, Missouri 63105

	 	Group-Contract No.
	 	635-40685

	 

	 	Plant
	 	Various






Attention: Mr. Martin Wilson



This confirms the discussion between Bill McNally, TVA, and Adam Anderson, Armstrong Coal
Company, Inc., “(Armstrong) to amend Contract 635-40685 (the “Contract”) as set forth below.



1. The effective date of this Supplement is December 28, 2011 (the “Effective Date”).



2. As of the Effective Date, TVA is exercising its right under the Contract’s Subsection 2.1.1.
as revised by Supplement No. 4 to decrease the Contract Year #4 (2012) Base Tonnage by ten
percent (10%). For the sake of clarity, TVA’s Base Tonnage for Contract Year #4 (2012) will be
reduced by 100,000 tons.




	 	 	 	 	 
	Year	 	Existing Commitment	 	New Commitment Under this Supplement
	2012

	 	1,000,000 tons
	 	900,000 tons





All other terms and conditions of the contract remain unchanged.




	 	 	 	 	 

	 

	Tennessee Valley Authority	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	By 	/s/ Connie S. Gazaway
 

	 	 
	 

	 	Connie S. Gazaway	 	 
	 

	 	Asset Management Specialist	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	/s/ Ray W. Popoynak
 

	 	 
	 

	 	Ray W. Popoynak	 	 
	 

	 	Manager, Coal Acquisition	 	 





TVA RESTRICATED INFORMATION
# C_2018195EN.01002301.xml

| 7.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/23

---

Special Report No 12/2018

‘Broadband in the EU Member States: despite progress, not all the Europe 2020 targets will be met’

(2018/C 195/08)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 12/2018 ‘Broadband in the EU Member States: despite progress, not all the Europe 2020 targets will be met’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu

---
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-40087

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

PEDRO ENRIQUE SANCHEZ-VASQUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:13-CR-1803-1

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and OWEN and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Pedro Enrique Sanchez-Vasquez was convicted of illegal reentry into the 

United States and was sentenced to serve 46 months in prison. He did not 

timely notice his appeal from his judgment of conviction. Rather, he filed an 

untimely pro se notice of appeal and averred that counsel had ignored his 

request to timely file a notice of appeal. The district court construed this filing 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 18, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-40087 Document: 00513276323 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/18/2015
No. 15-40087

2

as a request to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal and denied it. The 

district court also noted that his notice of appeal was untimely.

Now, Sanchez-Vasquez argues that the district court should have 

construed his untimely pro se notice of appeal as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion 

seeking an out-of-time appeal grounded in a claim that counsel rendered 

ineffective assistance by not timely noticing his appeal. He requests that we 

vacate the district court’s IFP order and remand for further proceedings. 

We should always be aware of our jurisdiction and raise this issue on our 

own when necessary. United States v. Villanueva-Diaz, 634 F.3d 844, 848 (5th 

Cir. 2011). “An appeal permitted by law as of right from a district court to a 

court of appeals may be taken only by filing a notice of appeal with the district 

court within the time allowed by Rule 4.” FED. R. APP. P. 3(a)(1). Thus, a notice 

of appeal is a mandatory precondition to the exercise of this court’s appellate 

jurisdiction. See id. Because Sanchez-Vasquez filed no notice of appeal from 

the order he is now challenging, we do not have jurisdiction over this appeal, 

and it is DISMISSED.

 Case: 15-40087 Document: 00513276323 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/18/2015
Michael TYLER, Petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 19-5189.

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Amendment Number One



 Exhibit 10.38(i) 
  
 AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE 
  
 TO THE 
  
 MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN 
  
 DEFERRAL OPPORTUNITY PLAN 
  
 WHEREAS, Fort James Corporation (“Fort James”) previously adopted the Management Incentive Plan Deferral Opportunity Plan (“Plan”) for a select group of management and highly compensated employees; 
  
 WHEREAS, Georgia-Pacific Corporation (“G-P”) acquired all of the
stock of Fort James effective as of November 26, 2000 and, by resolution of the Board of Directors of Fort James, became the Plan Administrator of this Plan effective as of January 27, 2001; 
  
 WHEREAS, G-P desires to merge the Fort James Supplemental Deferral Plan into
this Plan effective as of October 1, 2001; and 
  
 WHEREAS, G-P
desires to cease all deferrals under this Plan effective as of October 1, 2001; 
  
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
  
 1. Effective as of October 1, 2001, the Fort James Supplemental Deferral Plan shall merge into this Plan and shall be subject to all the terms and
conditions of this Plan, including but not limited to, the interest rate and benefit payment provisions. 
  
 2. All deferrals under the Plan shall cease effective as of October 1, 2001. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, G-P has adopted and executed this Amendment Number One effective as of the
1st day of October, 2001. 
  

			
	 GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION

		
	 BY:
	 	 /s/ Patricia A. Barnard


	 Patricia A. Barnard

	 Executive Vice President – Human Resources
# C_2017409EN.01000401.xml

| 1.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 409/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 409/4

---

Commission communication concerning the implementation of Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 552/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the interoperability of the European Air Traffic Management network (1)

1

(Publication of titles and references of Community specifications under the Regulation)

(Publication of titles and references of Community specifications under the Regulation)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 409/05)

| Organisation | Reference and title of the Community specification | Reference of superseded Community specification | Date of cessation of presumption of conformity of superseded Community specification |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Eurocontrol (2) | Spec-0101 Edition 1.2 Eurocontrol Specification for the Initial Flight Plan (IFPL) (3) | Spec-0101 Edition 1.1 | 5.3.2017 |

Organisation

Reference and title of the Community specification

Reference of superseded Community specification

Date of cessation of presumption of conformity of superseded Community specification

Eurocontrol (2)

2

Spec-0101 Edition 1.2 Eurocontrol Specification for the Initial Flight Plan (IFPL) (3)

3

Spec-0101 Edition 1.1

5.3.2017

---

(1)  OJ L 96, 31.3.2004, p. 26.

1

(2)  European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation: Rue de la Fusée 96, 1130 Brussels, Belgium, tel. +32 27299011, fax +32 27295190

2

(3)  http://www.eurocontrol.int/publications/initial-flight-plan-ifpl-specification

3

---
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018186EN.01002601.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 31.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/26 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.8890 — BNP Paribas/ABN AMRO Bank Luxembourg)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 186/08)

1.

On 24 May 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018186EN.01002601-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | BNP Paribas (‘BNPP’, France), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | ABN AMRO Bank (Luxembourg) SA (‘ABN AMRO Bank Luxembourg’, Luxembourg). |

BNPP acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of ABN AMRO Bank Luxembourg.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   BNPP: active worldwide in retail banking and services as well as corporate and institutional banking,

—   ABN AMRO Bank Luxembourg: active in private banking.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018186EN.01002601-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.8890 — BNP Paribas/ABN AMRO Bank Luxembourg

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| E-mail: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018186EN.01002601-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018186EN.01002601-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
Edna Mary LARSON, Petitioner, v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, dba Champion Mortgage Company of Texas, et al.

No. 19M60

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 111 (Thursday, June 9, 2022)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Pages 35077-35078]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12586]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 111 / Thursday, June 9, 2022 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 35077]]


                Presidential Determination No. 2022-18 of June 6, 2022

                
Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 
                303 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as Amended, 
                on Electric Heat Pumps

                Memorandum for the Secretary of Energy

                Ensuring a robust, resilient, and sustainable domestic 
                industrial base to meet the requirements of the clean 
                energy economy is essential to our national security, a 
                resilient energy sector, and the preservation of 
                domestic critical infrastructure. Therefore, by the 
                authority vested in me as President by the Constitution 
                and the laws of the United States of America, including 
                section 303 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as 
                amended (the ``Act'') (50 U.S.C. 4533), I hereby 
                determine, pursuant to section 303(a)(5) of the Act, 
                that:

                    (1) electric heat pumps are industrial resources, 
                materials, or critical technology items essential to 
                the national defense;
                    (2) without Presidential action under section 303 
                of the Act, United States industry cannot reasonably be 
                expected to provide the capability for the needed 
                industrial resource, material, or critical technology 
                item in a timely manner; and
                    (3) purchases, purchase commitments, or other 
                action pursuant to section 303 of the Act are the most 
                cost effective, expedient, and practical alternative 
                method for meeting the need.

                Pursuant to section 303(a)(7)(B) of the Act, I find 
                that action to expand the domestic production 
                capability for electric heat pumps is necessary to 
                avert an industrial resource or critical technology 
                item shortfall that would severely impair national 
                defense capability. Therefore, I waive the requirements 
                of section 303(a)(1)-(a)(6) of the Act for the purpose 
                of expanding the domestic production capability for 
                electric heat pumps.

[[Page 35078]]

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                determination in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, June 6, 2022

[FR Doc. 2022-12586
Filed 6-8-22; 8:45 am]
Billing code 6450-01-P
Clayton Paul BATEMAN, Petitioner v. MISSISSIPPI.

No. 19-6038

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 12, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Mississippi denied.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018401EN.01001201.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 7.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 401/12 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9160 — Centerbridge/Hospital Topco)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 401/10)

1.

On 29 October 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018401EN.01001201-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Centerbridge Partners, L.P. (‘Centerbridge’, United States of America), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Hospital Topco Limited (‘Hospital Topco’, United Kingdom). |

Centerbridge acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Hospital Topco.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Centerbridge: investment management firm focused on private equity and distressed investment opportunities,

—   for Hospital Topco: parent company of the healthcare group that carries out its operations under the BMI Healthcare brand, and the property interest holding companies.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018401EN.01001201-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9160 — Centerbridge/Hospital Topco

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018401EN.01001201-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018401EN.01001201-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
Maechel Shawn PATTERSON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA.

No. 19-7980.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Lena MCCOLLUM, Petitioner v. Hubert PETERKIN, et al.

No. 19-5440

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# C_2018079EN.01001701.xml

| 2.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/17

---

Special Report No 6/2018

‘Free Movement of Workers — the fundamental freedom ensured but better targeting of EU funds would aid worker mobility’

(2018/C 79/06)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 6/2018 ‘Free Movement of Workers — the fundamental freedom ensured but better targeting of EU funds would aid worker mobility’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://eca.europa.eu

---
EXHIBIT 6

REDACTED IN ITS 

ENTIRETY

To Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to 

Dismiss Complaint

Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 50-7 Filed 08/06/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 749
# C_2018335EN.01002301.xml

| 20.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 335/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 335/23

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9059 — CVC/Messer Group/Divestment Business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 335/14)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | CVC Capital Partners SICAV-FIS SA (‘CVC’) (Luxembourg), |
| --- | --- |

—

CVC Capital Partners SICAV-FIS SA (‘CVC’) (Luxembourg),

| — | Messer Group GmbH (‘Messer’) (Germany), and |
| --- | --- |

—

Messer Group GmbH (‘Messer’) (Germany), and

| — | Divestment Business, which consists of assets and businesses in North and South America as well as global helium sourcing contracts and assets, being divested in the context of the proposed merger between Praxair, Inc. and Linde AG. |
| --- | --- |

—

Divestment Business, which consists of assets and businesses in North and South America as well as global helium sourcing contracts and assets, being divested in the context of the proposed merger between Praxair, Inc. and Linde AG.

CVC and Messer, through a newly created joint venture, acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the Divestment Business.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

—   for Messer: industrial gases and related businesses as well as services related to those products,

—   for CVC: provision of advice to and management of investments funds and platforms,

—   for the Divestment Business: industrial gases and related businesses in North and South America as well as helium sourcing activities globally.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9059 — CVC/Messer Group/Divestment Business

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| --- |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
IN RE Craig Melvin SCHAFER, Petitioner.

No. 19-5721

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. petitioner allowed until November 25, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 115 (Wednesday, June 15, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 36197]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12838]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-95074; File No. SR-CboeBZX-2022-017]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of 
Withdrawal of Proposed Rule Change To Amend BZX Rule 11.17, Clearly 
Erroneous Executions

June 9, 2022.
    On March 7, 2022, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'') filed 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant 
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') 
\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to (i) make 
the current clearly erroneous execution (``CEE'') pilot program 
permanent, and (ii) limit the circumstances where CEE reviews would 
continue to be available during Regular Trading Hours. The proposed 
rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register on March 
11, 2022.\3\ On April 19, 2022, the Commission designated a longer 
period for Commission action on the proposed rule change, until June 9, 
2022.\4\ The Commission has received no comment letters on the 
proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 94374 (March 7, 
2022), 87 FR 14062.
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 94744, 87 FR 24351 
(April 25, 2022).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On June 8, 2022, the Exchange withdrew the proposed rule change 
(File No. SR-CboeBZX-2022-017).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-12838 Filed 6-14-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P