alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AO 120 (Rev. 08/10) 

TO: Mail Stop 8

Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

P.O. Box 1450

Alexandria, VA 22313-1450

REPORT ON THE

FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN

ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR

TRADEMARK

In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been

filed in the U.S. District Court on the following

G Trademarks or G Patents. ( G the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):

DOCKET NO. DATE FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT

PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:

DATE INCLUDED INCLUDED BY

G Amendment G Answer G Cross Bill G Other Pleading

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:

DECISION/JUDGEMENT

CLERK (BY) DEPUTY CLERK DATE

Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director

Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy

Case 2:24-cv-00079-JRG Document 2 Filed 02/06/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 37
# C_2020345EN.01011001.xml

| 16.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 345/110 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 345/110

---

P8_TA(2018)0388

EU-Bahamas Agreement on the short-stay visa waiver ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 23 October 2018 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Commonwealth of the Bahamas amending the Agreement between the European Community and the Commonwealth of the Bahamas on the short-stay visa waiver (12389/2017 — C8-0173/2018 — 2017/0169(NLE))

(Consent)

(2020/C 345/23)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (12389/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (12389/2017),

| — | having regard to the draft agreement between the European Union and the Commonwealth of the Bahamas amending the Agreement between the European Community and the Commonwealth of the Bahamas on the short-stay visa waiver (12388/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft agreement between the European Union and the Commonwealth of the Bahamas amending the Agreement between the European Community and the Commonwealth of the Bahamas on the short-stay visa waiver (12388/2017),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 77(2), point (a), and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0173/2018), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 77(2), point (a), and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0173/2018),

| — | having regard to Rule 99(1) and (4) and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 99(1) and (4) and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0304/2018), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0304/2018),

| 1. | Gives its consent to conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Commonwealth of the Bahamas. |
| --- | --- |

2.

---
Eric S. NEWTON, Jr., Petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 19-8069.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 26, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Cuyahoga County denied.
# C_2017188EN.01002101.xml

| 14.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 188/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 188/21

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2017/C 188/13)

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Aluminium foil in small rolls | The People’s Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 217/2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain aluminium foils in rolls originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ L 69, 13.3.2013, p. 11). | 14.3.2018 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Aluminium foil in small rolls

The People’s Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 217/2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain aluminium foils in rolls originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ L 69, 13.3.2013, p. 11).

14.3.2018

---

(1)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

1

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
Joel Howard JAMES, Petitioner v. MICHIGAN

No. 19-424

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
Exhibit 4.4 




CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
TO
CERTIFICATE OF
        INCORPORATION
OF
MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC. 



        Medical
Technology Systems, Inc., a Company organized and existing under the laws of the State of
Delaware (the “Company”), certifies as follows: 



        FIRST:
That in accordance with the requirements of Section 242 of the General Company Law of the
State of Delaware, the Board of Directors of the Company, acting at a meeting of the
directors of the Company at which a quorum was present duly adopted resolutions proposing
and declaring advisable a reverse stock split of the Common Stock outstanding and
recommending that such proposal be submitted to the stockholders of the Company for their
consideration, action and approval. 



        SECOND:
Article 4 of the Certificate of Incorporation of this Company, as previously amended,
shall be further amended by adding a new paragraph to the end of said Article 4, which new
paragraph shall read as follows: 



	 	
“Effective as of 12:01 a.m., Eastern Standard time, December 9, 2000, this Certificate of Amendment
to the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, each 2.5 shares of Common Stock, $.01
par value per share, of the Company then issued and outstanding or held in the treasury of
the Company automatically shall be combined into 1 share of Common Stock of the Company.
There shall be no fractional shares issued. Each holder of shares of Common Stock who
otherwise would be entitled to receive a fractional share shall be entitled to receive a
cash payment in lieu thereof at a price equal to the fraction to which such holder would
otherwise be entitled to receive multiplied by the closing price of Common Stock as
reported on the OTC Bulletin Board on the last trading day prior to the filing of this
Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, or, if such
price is not available, the average of the last bid and asked prices of the Common Stock
on such day, or such other price as may be determined by the Board of Directors of the
Company.”	 





        THIRD:
That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of the Board of Directors, at least a majority of
the outstanding stock of the Company entitled to vote on the reverse stock split, acting
at a meeting of stockholders of the Company at which a quorum was present in accordance
with the General Company Law of the State of Delaware, duly approved the aforesaid
amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company. 



        FOURTH:
That the aforesaid amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company was duly
adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Company Law of the
State of Delaware. 



        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate
of Incorporation to be duly executed in accordance with Section 103 of the General Company
Law of the State of Delaware this 6th day of December, 2000. 




	 	MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC.  
	  	  	  
	  	  	  
	 	By: 	/s/ Michael P. Conroy
	 	 	

	 	 	Michael P. Conroy, Chief Financial Officer and Vice President
### The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge 1 

### for the Western District of Missouri. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-2435

___________ Frances L. Kearns, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Marvin T. Runyon, Jr., * Western District of Missouri. Postmaster General, United * States Postal Service, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: March 7, 1997 Filed: April 2, 1997

___________ Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
Fr ances L. Kearns appeals the district court's grant of summar y 1 judgment to the United States Postal Service (US PS) on her claim under the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. We affirm. Kearns was a part-time flex clerk (PTF clerk) at the Drexel, Mi ssouri facility. As such, she was guaranteed two hours of employment every two weeks, but from 1976 to 1993, she had worked approximately nineteen hours per week. In 1993, a second PTF clerk was hired, and Kearns's hours were reduced to approximately twelve or fourteen per week. As relevant to this appeal, Kearns claimed

### -2-

the reduction was bas ed on her relationship with her disabled parents, in violation of the Rehabilitation Act. This court reviews the district cour t's grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the district court; summary judgment is appropriate when, viewing the record in the l ight most favorable to the nonmoving party, there is no genuine issue of ma terial fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Earnest v. Courtney , 64 F.3d 365, 366-67 (8th Cir. 1995) (per curiam). We find that the USPS's actions in hiring a second clerk and re ducing Kearns's hours accordingly did not constitute anadverse employment action that violated the Rehabilitation Act. Kearns was guaranteed only two hour s of work per pay period, and the USPS provided unrebutted evidence that a second c lerk was hired to enable the post office to remain open in th e event b oth the postmaster and Kearns were absent. Cf. Burns v. City o f Columbus , 91 F.3d 836, 841-42 (6th Cir. 1996) (handicap may not be sol e reason for adverse employment action). Accordingly, we affirm. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00641

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO MOVE, 

ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT AND 

WAIVER OF FOREIGN SERVICE REQUIREMENT

Before the Court is Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Electronics 

Company, Ltd.’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Move, Answer, or Otherwise 

Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint and Waiver of Foreign Service Requirement. After considering

same, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be GRANTED.

IT IS ORDERED that the deadline for Defendants Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and 

Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd. to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint is 

hereby extended up to and including April 22, 2024.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that service of process for Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. has 

been waived.

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC

Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, 

INC.,

Defendants

Case 2:23-cv-00641-JRG-RSP Document 21-1 Filed 01/08/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 810
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET-WTI - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                      Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/15/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      549,504
COMMITMENTS
  86,831   41,547  126,293  320,240  368,918  533,364  536,758   16,140   12,746

CHANGES FROM 04/08/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:         49)
  -8,772    4,498    4,811    2,992   -9,074     -969      235    1,018     -186

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    15.8      7.6     23.0     58.3     67.1     97.1     97.7      2.9      2.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      150)
      34       38       58       64       66      131      136
```

----

Updated April 18, 2014
IN RE James BRYANT, Petitioner

No. 19-5756

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Dwight BULLARD, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8199.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
GREENWICH STREET MUNICIPALS FUND INC.
                          10f-3 REPORT
              July 1, 1997 through October 31, 1997
                                

                                                       % of
               Trade                         Par       Purchase
Fund % of
Issuer              Date Selling Dealer      Amount         Price
Assets    Issue

Washington St. Pub. Power     9/11/97   Goldman, Sachs & Co.
$1,000,000     $98.296        0.40%     3.59%
5.125% due 7/1/2011

Houston, TX Water & Sewer     9/18/97   Merrill Lynch
1,000,000   93.963       0.40 3.44
5.000% due 12/1/2025

NYC Trans. Finance Auth. 10/3/97   Lehman Brothers
2,000,000   96.336       0.82 2.06
5.000% due 8/15/2017
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION**




In
      connection with the quarterly report of Modigene Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Abraham Havron, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




/s/
                Abraham HavronAbraham
                HavronChief
                Executive OfficerModigene
                Inc.




May
      12,
      2008
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Wireless
Holdings, Inc., for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2004, I, Joseph Hess, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Wireless Holdings, Inc. hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,
          2004, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the period ended June 30, 2004, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
          Wireless Holdings, Inc.

Dated:  August 18, 2004

WIRELESS HOLDINGS, INC.


By: /s/ Joseph Hess
-------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
Paul R. BUTTS, Petitioner, v. Eric D. WILSON, Warden.

No. 19-5911

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/16/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       84,588
COMMITMENTS
  23,574    2,364    1,927   53,377   77,907   78,878   82,198    5,710    2,390

CHANGES FROM 04/09/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        561)
    -448     -894    1,189      288      468    1,029      763     -468     -202

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    27.9      2.8      2.3     63.1     92.1     93.2     97.2      6.8      2.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       76)
      12        3        1       40       34       52       38
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/16/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      202,956
COMMITMENTS
  64,564   40,767    1,372  119,294  153,582  185,230  195,721   17,726    7,235

CHANGES FROM 04/09/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      4,360)
  -1,975    4,101     -111    3,432   -2,106    1,346    1,884    3,014    2,476

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    31.8     20.1      0.7     58.8     75.7     91.3     96.4      8.7      3.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      142)
      34       18        8       67       49      107       69
```

----

Updated April 19, 2013
# C_2018272EN.01000101.xml

| 3.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 272/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 272/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8967 — BGŻ BNP Paribas/Parts of Raiffeisen Bank Polska)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 272/01)

On 16 July 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8967. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8967. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with this Quarterly Report of King Capital Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Sean King, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.       Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.       The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of King Capital Holdings, Inc.

 
| Dated: August 11, 2005 |
|------------------------|

 

**KING CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC.**

 
| By: | */s/ Sean King* |
|-----|-----------------|

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Office
Patrick S. CRICK, Petitioner, v. James KEY, Superintendent, Airway Heights Corrections Center.

No. 19M4

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion for leave to proceed as a veteran denied.
Delmar HARDY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-139

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.