alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Thomas Bradford WATERS, Petitioner, v. John STEWART, et al.

No. 19-7319.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
HEON-CHEOL CHI, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-1000.

Supreme Court of the United States.

June 1, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 32 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF THE CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NA4 TIONAL HONOR GUARD AND PIPE BAND EX5 HIBITION. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Grand Lodge of the Fra7 ternal Order of Police and its auxiliary (in this 
2 

•HCON 32 EH 

1 resolution referred to as the ‘‘sponsor’’) shall be permitted 

2 to sponsor a public event, the National Honor Guard and 

3 Pipe Band Exhibition (in this resolution referred to as the 

4 ‘‘event’’), on the Capitol Grounds, in order to allow law 

5 enforcement representatives to exhibit their ability to dem6 onstrate Honor Guard programs and provide for a bag 

7 pipe exhibition. 

8 (b) DATE OF EVENT.—The event shall be held on 

9 May 14, 2013, or on such other date as the Speaker of 

10 the House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules 

11 and Administration of the Senate jointly designate. 

12 SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS. 

13 (a) IN GENERAL.—Under conditions to be prescribed 

14 by the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police 

15 Board, the event shall be— 

16 (1) free of admission charge and open to the 

17 public; and 

18 (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of 

19 Congress. 

20 (b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—The sponsor shall 

21 assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities 

22 incident to all activities associated with the event. 

23 SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS. 

24 Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Cap25 itol, the sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol 
3 

•HCON 32 EH 

1 Grounds such stage, sound amplification devices, and 

2 other related structures and equipment, as may be re3 quired for the event. 

4 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

5 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce6 ment of the restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of 

7 title 40, United States Code, concerning sales, advertise8 ments, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, 

9 as well as other restrictions applicable to the Capitol 

10 Grounds, in connection with the event. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 6, 2013. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 32 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

National Honor Guard and Pipe Band Exhibition. 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the
EXHIBIT 10.10.BJ


 


8% CONVERTIBLE TERM NOTE


 


	
  $100,000

  	
   

  	
  December 19, 2003

  



 


ELECTROPURE, INC., a
California corporation, (the “Company”), for the value received, hereby
unconditionally and absolutely promises to pay to the order of ANTHONY M.
FRANK, or holder (collectively, the “Holder”), upon presentation
and surrender of this Note at its office at 23456 South Pointe Drive, Laguna
Hills, California 92653, or such other place as the Company may, from time to
time, designate, the sum of One Hundred Thousand ($100,000), in lawful
money of the United States, on December 19, 2004, or if such day is not a
regular business day, then on the next business day thereafter (the “Maturity
Date”).


 


1.             CONVERSION.


 


The Holder of this Note shall have the right, at its option, at any
time up until 5:00 P.M. Los Angeles time on the fifth (5th) day immediately
before the Maturity Date (except that, with respect to any portion of this Note
which shall be called for prepayment, such right shall as to such portion
terminate at 5:00 P.M. Los Angeles time on the fifth (5th) day immediately
prior to the Prepayment Date (as defined in Section 2 hereof)), to convert all
or any portion of the principal amount of this Note, including interest accrued
thereon, subject to the terms and provisions of this Section 1, into common
stock of Electropure, Inc. at the then fair market value (closing bid price) on
the date of such conversion.


 


2.             PAYMENTS
AND PREPAYMENTS.


 


(a)           All
payments and prepayments of principal and interest shall be made in immediately
available funds on or before the Maturity Date to the Holder at 1 Maritime
Plaza, Suite 825, San Francisco, California 
94111.


 


(b)           The
unpaid principal amount of the Note from time to time outstanding shall bear
interest from the date of this Note at the rate of Eight Percent (8%) per annum
until paid.  Interest shall be computed
for the actual number of days elapsed on the basis of a year consisting of 360
days.


 


(c)           The
Company may prepay at any time in advance of the Maturity Date all or any part
of this Note, plus accrued interest on the portion of the principal being
prepaid.  Interest on the portion of the
Note prepaid shall cease to accrue on and after the date of such prepayment.


 


3.             NOTICES
TO NOTEHOLDER.


 


So long as this Note shall be outstanding, if the Company (i) shall pay
any dividend or make any distribution upon the Company Stock or (ii) shall
effect a capital reorganization, reclassification of capital stock,
consolidation or merger with or into another corporation, sale, lease or transfer
of all or substantially all of the property and assets of the Company to
another corporation, or voluntary or involuntary dissolution, liquidation or
winding up of  the Company, then in any
such case, the Company shall cause to be mailed by certified mail to the
Holder, at least fifteen days prior to the date specified in (x) or (y) below,
as the case may be, a notice containing a
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000918904
<NAME> The Selmer Company, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    75024
<ALLOWANCES>                                      7267
<INVENTORY>                                      76920
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                152225
<PP&E>                                           73523
<DEPRECIATION>                                   12385
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  274978
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            35468
<BONDS>                                         132821
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        3107
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    274978
<SALES>                                         194876
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                194876
<CGS>                                           132527
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    34264
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  3733
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   604
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               14866
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   8882
<INCOME-TAX>                                      4833
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               4049
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   4368
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (319)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (319.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (319.00)
        

</TABLE>
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018230EN.01001101.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 230/11 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.8880 — Oetker/Henkell/Freixenet)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 230/08)

1.

On 22 June 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018230EN.01001101-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Henkell International GmbH (‘Henkell’, Germany), controlled by Dr. August Oetker KG (‘Oetker’, Germany), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Freixenet, SA (‘Freixenet’, Spain). |

Oetker acquires — through its wholly-owned subsidiary Henkell — within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Freixenet.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Henkell: production and sale of sparkling wine, wine and spirits,

—   for Oetker: manufacturer, supplier and distributor of food products, provider of shipping services, owner of specialised outlets for catering and publishing of cookbooks,

—   for Freixenet: production and sale of sparkling wine and still wine.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.8880 — Oetker/Henkell/Freixenet

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018230EN.01001101-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TEXARKANA DIVISION

ALEXANDRA DAVIS §

§

V. § CIVIL NO. 5:23cv32

§ 

JERRAL J. JONES, et al §

______________________________________________________________________________

MINUTES FOR MOTION HEARING

HELD BEFORE JUDGE ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III

APRIL 25, 2024

OPEN: 10:00 a.m. ADJOURN: 11:40 a.m.

______________________________________________________________________________

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF: Jay Gray, Erin Keil and Hailee Amox

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS/

COUNTER-PLAINTIFFS: Charles Babcock and Edwin Buffmire

ATTORNEY FOR THIRD-PARTY

DEFENDANT: Kris Hayes

ATTORNEY FOR NON-PARTY

MOVANT: Andrew Korn

LAW CLERK: Jordan Cowger

COURTROOM DEPUTY: Betty Schroeder

COURT REPORTER: Shelly Holmes

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

10:00 a.m. Case called, parties introduce themselves and announce ready, Court welcomes

everyone and gives preliminary comments

10:03 a.m. Mr. Andrew Korn argues non-party movant’s Amended Motion to Quash and

Amended Request for Protection (dkt. #79)

10:07 a.m. Court questions Mr. Korn; Mr. Korn responds

Case 5:23-cv-00032-RWS Document 85 Filed 04/25/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1500
10:11 a.m. Court questions Mr. Korn; Mr. Korn responds

10:31 a.m. Court questions Mr. Korn; Mr. Korn responds

10:36 a.m. Mr. Charles Babcock responds to argument

10:44 a.m. Court questions Mr. Babcock; Mr. Babcock responds

10:50 a.m. Court questions Mr. Babcock; Mr. Babcock responds

10:52 a.m. Mr. Ed Buffmire responds to question

10:54 a.m. Court questions Mr. Korn; Mr. Korn responds

11:08 a.m. Court questions Mr. Korn; Mr. Korn responds

11:09 a.m. Court will accept the tendering of the documents for in camera review

11:09 a.m. Mr. Babcock questions the Court as to whether they would be getting a copy of

the log; Mr. Korn responds; Court responds

11:13 a.m. Court questions Ms. Kris Hayes; Ms. Hayes responds

11:26 a.m. Mr. Jay Gray addresses the Court

11:28 a.m. Court questions Mr. Gray; Mr. Gray responds

11:30 a.m. Mr. Babcock responds

11:36 a.m. Mr. Gray responds

11:37 a.m. Court addresses Mr. Korn regarding the privilege log; Mr. Korn responds; Court

responds

11:40 a.m. Recess

Case 5:23-cv-00032-RWS Document 85 Filed 04/25/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1501
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 1304

JESSIE YOUNG , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. JOHN DOE HILL; JOHN DOE BREEN, Sergeant; JOHN DOE RODRIGUEZ,
Defendants

- Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Easter n District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Claude M. Hilton , Senior District Judge. ( 1:16

- cv
- 01304

- CMH

- JFA )

Submitted : August 20 , 2020 Decided: August 24, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, WYNN , and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges

.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion

.
Jessie Young, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jessie Young appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action without prejudice for failure to comply with the court’s previous order directing him to indicate whether he intended to prosecute his claims within 10 days of the court’s order. ∗ See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in Young’s informal
brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because th e informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Young has forfeited appella te review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the d istrict court ’s order

. Young v. Hill , No. 1:16

-

cv
- 1304

- CFM

- JFA (E.D. Va. March 2, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the dec isional process.
AFFIRMED

∗ Because the district court dismissed Young’s action “ for procedural reasons unrelated to the contents of the pleadings, ” and he could not cure the defect by amendment, we have jurisdiction over this appeal. Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc. , 807 F.3d 619, 624 (4th Cir. 2015) ; see GO Computer, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp. , 508 F.3d 170, 176 (4th Cir. 2007) ; see also Bing v. Brivo Sys., LLC , 959 F.3d 605, 610 (4th Cir. 2020)

.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

Plaintiff, '

'

versus ' NO. 1:23-CR-62-MAC

'

JONATHAN LEE EDWARDS, '

'

Defendant. '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Stetson conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued her Findings of Fact and Recommendation 

on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. Judge Stetson recommended that 

the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. She further recommended that the court adjudge 

the Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to Judge Stetson’s findings. The court ORDERS that the 

Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge are 

ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea.

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Jonathan Lee Edwards, is 

Case 1:23-cr-00062-MAC-ZJH Document 23 Filed 10/24/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 56
2

adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 

2252A(a)(2)(A) and (b)(1) – Distribution of Child Pornography.

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Plano, Texas, this 24th day of October, 2023.

Case 1:23-cr-00062-MAC-ZJH Document 23 Filed 10/24/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 57
Richard NATOFSKY, Petitioner, v. CITY OF NEW YORK.

No. 19-732.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Joseph REINWAND, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL ELECTRICAL BENEFIT FUNDS.

No. 19-5531

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Shaun A. HODGE, Petitioner, v. Kevin GENOVESE, Warden.

No. 19M116.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER PARTNERS II LLC,

 Plaintiff,

v.

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, D/B/A/ 

VERIZON WIRELESS AND VERIZON 

CORPORATE GROUP INC.,

 Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-cv-00007-JRG-RSP

ORDER

Before the Court is the Unopposed Motion to Withdraw as Counsel filed by Plaintiff 

Headwater Partners II LLC. Dkt. No. 43. After consideration, and noting its unopposed nature, the 

Motion is GRANTED. It is

ORDERED that Robert Christopher Bunt, Charles Ainsworth, and the firm Parker Bunt 

& Ainsworth, PC are withdrawn as counsel for Plaintiff in the above captioned case.

Case 2:24-cv-00007-JRG-RSP Document 52 Filed 07/19/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 519
Joseph Edwards TEAGUE, III, petitioner, v. NORTH CAROLINA.

No. 18-8668.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 23, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# C_2017411EN.01001501.xml

| 2.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 411/15 |
| --------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | -------- |

---

Winding-up proceedings — Decision to open winding-up proceedings in respect of the enterprise East-West Assekuranz AG

(2017/C 411/07)

Publication made in accordance with Article 280 of Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II)

| Insurance undertaking | East-West Assekuranz AG Mauerstrasse 83/84 10117 Berlin GERMANY | East-West Assekuranz AG | Mauerstrasse 83/84 | 10117 Berlin | GERMANY |
| ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------- | ---------------- | ------------ |
| East-West Assekuranz AG | | | | | |
| Mauerstrasse 83/84 | | | | | |
| 10117 Berlin | | | | | |
| GERMANY | | | | | |
| Date, entry into force and type of decision | Decision of 1 October 2017 of Charlottenburg District Court opening insolvency proceedings | | | | |
| Competent authorities | Charlottenburg District Court Amtsgerichtsplatz 1 14057 Berlin GERMANY | Charlottenburg District Court | Amtsgerichtsplatz 1 | 14057 Berlin | GERMANY |
| Charlottenburg District Court | | | | | |
| Amtsgerichtsplatz 1 | | | | | |
| 14057 Berlin | | | | | |
| GERMANY | | | | | |
| Supervisory authority | Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (Federal Financial Supervisory Authority) Graurheindorfer Strasse 108 53117 Bonn GERMANY | Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (Federal Financial Supervisory Authority) | Graurheindorfer Strasse 108 | 53117 Bonn | GERMANY |
| Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (Federal Financial Supervisory Authority) | | | | | |
| Graurheindorfer Strasse 108 | | | | | |
| 53117 Bonn | | | | | |
| GERMANY | | | | | |
| Administrator appointed | Dr Björn Gehde c/o Hilgers & Partner Law Practice Goethestrasse 85 10623 Berlin GERMANY Tel. +49 303157530 | Dr Björn Gehde | c/o Hilgers & Partner Law Practice | Goethestrasse 85 | 10623 Berlin |
| Dr Björn Gehde | | | | | |
| c/o Hilgers & Partner Law Practice | | | | | |
| Goethestrasse 85 | | | | | |
| 10623 Berlin | | | | | |
| GERMANY | | | | | |
| Tel. +49 303157530 | | | | | |
| Applicable law | German law —
Insolvenzordnung (InsO) (Insolvency Act) | | | | |

---
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 93 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 

3 3370) to delay the implementation of certain provisions 

4 of the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 

5 2012, and for other purposes, the Clerk of the House of 

6 Representatives shall make the following corrections: 

7 (1) In section 12— 
2 

•HCON 93 EH 

1 (A) in the matter preceding the new sub2 section added by the amendment made by such 

3 section, strike ‘‘, as amended by the preceding 

4 provisions of this Act, is further’’ and insert 

5 ‘‘is’’; and 

6 (B) in the new subsection added by the 

7 amendment made by such section, strike ‘‘(e)’’ 

8 and insert ‘‘(d)’’. 

9 (2) In section 14, before the closing quotation 

10 marks that immediately precede the period at the 

11 end insert ‘‘and’’. 

12 (3) In section 30— 

13 (A) in the matter that precedes paragraph 

14 (1), strike ‘‘is’’ and insert the following: ‘‘, as 

15 amended by section 27 of this Act, is further’’; 

16 (B) in paragraph (1)— 

17 (i) in the matter that precedes sub18 paragraph (A), strike ‘‘subparagraph (B)’’ 

19 and insert ‘‘subparagraph (C)’’; and 

20 (ii) in subparagraph (A)— 

21 (I) strike ‘‘subparagraph (A)’’ 

22 and insert ‘‘subparagraph (B)’’; and 

23 (II) strike ‘‘subparagraph (D)’’ 

24 and insert ‘‘subparagraph (E)’’; 
3 

•HCON 93 EH 

1 (C) in paragraph (2), strike ‘‘and (C) as 

2 subparagraphs (D), (E), and (G)’’ and insert 

3 ‘‘(C), and (D) as subparagraphs (D), (E), (F), 

4 and (H)’’; 

5 (D) in paragraph (3), in the matter pre6 ceding the new subparagraphs inserted by the 

7 amendment made by such paragraph, strike 

8 ‘‘subparagraph (B)’’ and insert ‘‘subparagraph 

9 (D)’’; and 

10 (E) in paragraph (4)— 

11 (i) in the matter preceding the new 

12 subparagraph inserted by the amendment 

13 made by such paragraph, strike ‘‘subpara14 graph (E)’’ and insert ‘‘subparagraph 

15 (F)’’; and 

16 (ii) in the new subparagraph inserted 

17 by the amendment made by such para18 graph, strike ‘‘(F)’’ and insert ‘‘(G)’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 13, 

2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 93 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives 

H.R. 3370. to make technical corrections in the enrollment of