alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 88 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater Washington 

Soap Box Derby. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2014 

Mr. HOYER (for himself, Mr. MORAN, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. DELANEY, Ms. 

EDWARDS, Mr. WOLF, Mr. CONNOLLY, and Ms. NORTON) submitted the 

following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater 

Washington Soap Box Derby. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR SOAP BOX 

4 DERBY RACES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Greater Washington Soap 

6 Box Derby Association (in this resolution referred to as 

7 the ‘‘sponsor’’) shall be permitted to sponsor a public 

8 event, soap box derby races (in this resolution referred to 

9 as the ‘‘event’’), on the Capitol Grounds. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 88 IH 

1 (b) DATE OF EVENT.—The event shall be held on 

2 June 14, 2014, or on such other date as the Speaker of 

3 the House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules 

4 and Administration of the Senate jointly designate. 

5 SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Under conditions to be prescribed 

7 by the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police 

8 Board, the event shall be— 

9 (1) free of admission charge and open to the 

10 public; and 

11 (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of 

12 Congress. 

13 (b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—The sponsor shall 

14 assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities 

15 incident to all activities associated with the event. 

16 SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS. 

17 Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Cap18 itol, the sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol 

19 Grounds such stage, sound amplification devices, and 

20 other related structures and equipment as may be required 

21 for the event. 

22 SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS. 

23 The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police 

24 Board are authorized to make such additional arrange25 ments as may be required to carry out the event. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HCON 88 IH 

1 SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

2 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce3 ment of the restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of 

4 title 40, United States Code, concerning sales, advertise5 ments, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, 

6 as well as other restrictions applicable to the Capitol 

7 Grounds, with respect to the event. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

HLD-112 (April 2010) NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-1128

___________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

 DARRYL L. FRANKLIN,

 Appellant 

 ____________________________________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Criminal No.2-99-cr-00238-1)

District Judge: Honorable Lawrence F. Stengel

____________________________________

Submitted for Possible Summary Action Pursuant to 

Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6

April 30, 2010

Before: SCIRICA, WEIS and GARTH, Circuit Judges

 (filed: May 24, 2010) 

___________

OPINION

___________

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Darryl Franklin, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals an

order of the District Court denying his motion to correct his sentence. For the reasons

that follow, we conclude that the District Court lacked jurisdiction to consider Franklin’s
 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. 1

 The subsequent version of the Rule, which went into effect before the District Court 2

denied Franklin’s motion, increased the filing period to 14 days.

2

motion. Therefore, we will vacate the District Court’s order.

Franklin was convicted of violating the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951, and

related offenses, and received a 205-month sentence. In November 2000, we affirmed the

sentence and conviction. See United States v. Franklin, 248 F.3d 1131 (3d Cir. 2000)

(table). Between 2002 and 2008, Franklin filed various unsuccessful motions under

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59 and 60, and 28 U.S.C. § 2255. 

More recently, Franklin filed a “motion for correction of illegal sentence”

under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(a). The District Court denied Franklin’s

motion, reasoning that it was both untimely and without merit. Franklin filed a timely

notice of appeal.1

“Federal courts are not courts of general jurisdiction; they have only the

power that is authorized by Article III of the Constitution and the statutes enacted by

Congress pursuant thereto.” Bender v. Williamsport Area Sch. Dist., 475 U.S. 534, 541

(1986). We have “an obligation to inquire sua sponte into [our] own jurisdiction and,

necessarily, into the jurisdiction of the District Court to enter the order on appeal.” 

United States v. Higgs, 504 F.3d 456, 457 (3d Cir. 2007). 

Under the version of Rule 35(a) in force when Franklin filed his motion, a

motion to correct or reduce a sentence was due within seven days of sentencing. In 2
3

Higgs, we concluded that the seven-day time limit in Rule 35 was jurisdictional. See 504

F.3d at 464 (citing Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205 (2007)). In this case, Franklin was

sentenced in February 2000 and filed his Rule 35 motion in November 2009. The District

Court clearly lacked jurisdiction to entertain his motion and should have dismissed it. 

The appeal is hereby denied.
## **Exhibit 32.2**

## ** **

**CERTIFICATIONPERSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PERSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofSteinway Musical Instruments, Inc.  (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, DennisM. Hanson, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|        | /s/ Dennis M. Hanson                |   |
|-------------|-------------------------------------|--------|
|        |                                |
|        | Senior Executive Vice President and |
|        | Chief Financial Officer             |
|        | (Principal Financial Officer)       |
|        |
| May 6, 2004 |

 

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to Steinway Musical Instruments, Inc.and will be retained by Steinway Musical Instruments, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
# C_2017232EN.01000701.xml

| 18.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/7

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya apply

(2017/C 232/09)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44 (2).

2

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DGC 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DGC 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/44.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil the listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the statement of reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (3).

3

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 12, 19.1.2016, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

3

---
NO. 07-01-0374-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL E

	FEBRUARY 5, 2003

	______________________________

	DORIS JEAN WILLIAMS, JOHNNIE JUNE CAMPBELL, 

	AND THE ESTATE OF LEAVIRTA AUSTIN, DECEASED, APPELLANTS

	V.

	DAMON HILL, M.D., APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 237TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

	NO. 2000-509,771-A; HONORABLE SAM MEDINA, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., REAVIS, J. and BOYD, S.J.1

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Appellants Doris Jean Williams, Johnnie June Campbell, and the Estate of Leavirta Austin, Deceased, filed a Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Appeal on October 29, 2002, averring that they no longer wish to prosecute their appeal. 

	Without passing on the merits of the case, appellants’ motion for voluntary dismissal is granted and the appeal is hereby dismissed.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.2.   Having dismissed the appeal at appellants’ personal request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.  

							Phil Johnson

						    	Chief Justice
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION


<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Environmental  Service
Professionals,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending
September 30, 2006 (the "Report") I, Edward Torres,  Chairman,  Chief  Executive
Officer and President, and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated: November 3, 2006


\s\ Edward Torres
----------------------------------------------------
Edward Torres, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
 and President,

         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Environmental  Service
Professionals,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending
September 30, 2006 (the "Report") I, Michael Fell,  Chief  Financial  Officer of
the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated: November 3, 2006


\s\ Michael Fell
-----------------------------------------------------
Michael Fell, Chief Financial Officer,

         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 104 (Tuesday, May 31, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 32461]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11516]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--PXI Systems Alliance, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on May 6, 2022, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. (``PXI 
Systems'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Millimeter Wave Systems, LLC, Amherst, MA, has been added 
as a party to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and PXI Systems intends to file 
additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On November 22, 2000, PXI Systems filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on March 3, 2001 (66 FR 13971).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on February 24, 
2022. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on March 11, 2022 (87 FR 14044).

Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2022-11516 Filed 5-27-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

SIGNATURE SYSTEMS, LLC,

Appellant

v.

AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY, AMERICAN 

EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES 

COMPANY, INC.,

Appellees

KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF 

COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 

AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES 

PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

Intervenor

______________________ 

2020-1319

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. CBM2018-

00035.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

EDWARD A. PENNINGTON, Smith, Gambrell & Russell, 

LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also 

Case: 20-1319 Document: 66 Page: 1 Filed: 11/03/2022
represented by JOHN P. MOY. 

 JOHN D. VANDENBERG, Klarquist Sparkman, LLP, Portland, OR, argued for appellees. Also represented by 

ROBERT TODD CRUZEN, SARAH ELISABETH JELSEMA, TODD 

M. SIEGEL. 

 PETER JOHN SAWERT, Office of the Solicitor, United 

States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for 

intervenor. Also represented by KAKOLI CAPRIHAN,

THOMAS W. KRAUSE, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED. 

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, PROST and 

TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

November 3, 2022 

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 20-1319 Document: 66 Page: 2 Filed: 11/03/2022
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/13/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      110,469
COMMITMENTS
  17,693   13,385    6,227   79,999   87,719  103,919  107,331    6,550    3,138

CHANGES FROM 05/06/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,482)
     278    2,669       -2      867   -1,712    1,143      955      339      527

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    16.0     12.1      5.6     72.4     79.4     94.1     97.2      5.9      2.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       93)
      11        6        2       56       38       67       46
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/13/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      289,408
COMMITMENTS
  90,560   39,183    1,996  176,235  238,228  268,791  279,407   20,617   10,001

CHANGES FROM 05/06/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     17,406)
   4,852    5,194     -908   10,802   10,613   14,746   14,899    2,660    2,507

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    31.3     13.5      0.7     60.9     82.3     92.9     96.5      7.1      3.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      203)
      60       29       12       83       66      148      102
```

----

Updated May 16, 2014
Kevin Michael-Ferdinand RICHARDS, Petitioner, v. MICHIGAN.

No. 19-7890.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 4, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
John L. CORRIGAN, Jr., Petitioner, v. CITY OF SAVAGE, MINNESOTA, et al.

No. 19-1076.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 4, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund V L.P. (the "Fund") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer of the Fund's general partner, Boston Capital Associates V, L.L.C., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                  
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.



|                  |  |                            
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:             |  |                            
|February 14, 2008 |  | /s/ John P. Manning        
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  | John P. Manning            
|                  |  | Principal Executive Officer
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  |                            



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.