alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA '

'

versus ' NO. 1:24-CR-16-MAC

'

BOBBY RAY EMANIS '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Stetson conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued her Findings of Fact and Recommendation 

on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. Judge Stetson recommended that 

the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. She further recommended that the court adjudge 

the Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to Judge Stetson’s findings. The court ORDERS that the 

Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge are 

ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea 

agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Bobby Ray Emanis, is 

Case 1:24-cr-00016-MAC-CLS Document 24 Filed 07/02/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 68
2

adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 

922(g)(1) - Felon in Possession of a Firearm.

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 2nd day of July, 2024.

Case 1:24-cr-00016-MAC-CLS Document 24 Filed 07/02/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 69
Marcus Scott CRUM, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7811.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 22 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 22

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
  limit the number of consecutive terms that a Member of Congress may 
                                 serve.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 22, 2013

    Mr. Harris introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
  limit the number of consecutive terms that a Member of Congress may 
                                 serve.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. No person who has been a Senator for two full 
consecutive terms shall again be a Senator until the date that is one 
year after the end of such second full consecutive term.
    ``Section 2. No person who has been a Representative for six full 
consecutive terms shall again be a Representative until the date that 
is one year after the end of the sixth full consecutive term.
    ``Section 3. For the purposes of this article, any term that began 
before the date of the ratification of this article shall not be 
included in determining the number of full consecutive terms that a 
person has been a Senator or Representative.''.
                                 <all>
```
Petitioner and Appellant, 

v. 

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Respondent and Appellee. 

ORDER 

Appellant Danny Lee Warner, Jr. has filed a Motion For Leave to File an Overlength 

Brief of 13,000 words. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that motion to file an overlength brief is DENIED. 

Appellant has until September 22, 2022, within which to file his opening brief. 

DATED this —4— —day of September, 2022. 

For the Court, 

Chief Justice
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The
Board of Directors
Wave Systems Corp.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements Nos. 333-46330, 333-33236, 333-92845, 333-38265, 333-28819,
333-20017, 333-73236 and 333-65648 on Form S-3 and Nos. 333-88665, 333-68911, 333-69041,
33-97612, 333-11611 and 333-11609 on Form S-8, of our report dated March 7, 2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Wave
Systems Corp. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficiency) and other comprehensive income (loss),
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001 and for the period from February 12, 1988 (inception) through December 31, 2001
which report appears in the December 31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K/A of Wave Systems Corp.



Boston,
Massachusetts
January 7, 2003

---

QuickLinks
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation Nos. 701-TA-249 and 731-TA-262-263 and 265 (Fifth Review)]

## Determination

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the Act”), that revocation of the countervailing duty order on heavy iron construction castings from Brazil, the antidumping duty order on heavy iron construction castings from Canada, and the antidumping duty orders on iron construction castings from Brazil and China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to pertinent industries in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.                

## Background 

The Commission instituted these reviews on December 1, 2021 (86 FR 68283) and determined on March 7, 2022, that it would conduct expedited reviews (87 FR 21136, April 11, 2022).

                    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on May 13, 2022. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5324 (May 2022), entitled                     *Iron Construction Castings from Brazil, Canada, and China: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-249 and 731-TA-262-263 and 265 (Fifth Review).*

By order of the Commission.

Issued: May 13, 2022.

Lisa Barton,

Secretary to the Commission.

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2022-10694 Filed 5-17-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Jerry Wilson HARTLEY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8265.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of SeaBright Insurance Holdings, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Robert P. Cuthbert,
Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:
 November 10, 2008/s/ Robert
 P. CuthbertRobert P.
 CuthbertSenior Vice
 President, Chief Financial Officerand
 Assistant Secretary A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to SeaBright Insurance Holdings, Inc. and
will be retained by SeaBright Insurance Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       7,263,828
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         800,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               700,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 34,997,823
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      38,342,245
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        38,461,675
<LOANS>                                     80,922,947
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,027,355
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             133,914,197
<DEPOSITS>                                 107,473,006
<SHORT-TERM>                                14,083,374
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,536,105
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,676,860
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,144,852
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             133,914,197
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              6,732,695
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,374,342
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               313,430
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             9,420,467
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           3,717,409
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,356,928
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        5,063,539
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  180,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              5,090,851
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,122,106
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,122,106
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,122,106
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.56
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.43
<LOANS-NON>                                    710,834
<LOANS-PAST>                                    11,916
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              2,314,980
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               818,637
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   36,485
<RECOVERIES>                                    65,203
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,027,355
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,027,355
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
```
 
 
WHEAT-HRSpring - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                          Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/01/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       58,789
COMMITMENTS
  18,449    7,780    2,096   28,253   35,979   48,798   45,855    9,991   12,934

CHANGES FROM 06/24/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -5,467)
  -3,201    1,084     -983      751   -3,707   -3,433   -3,606   -2,034   -1,861

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    31.4     13.2      3.6     48.1     61.2     83.0     78.0     17.0     22.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       78)
      20       10       13       39       24       67       42
```

----

Updated July 4, 2014
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

EFD SPORTS, LLC

v.

BALLY’S CORPORATION

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL NO. 4:24-CV-87-SDJ

ORDER

Before the Court is the parties’ Agreed Motion for Entry of Protective Order.

(Dkt. #21). The Court, having considered the motion, concludes that it should be 

granted.

It is therefore ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The Court will issue 

the protective order by separate order.

Case 4:24-cv-00087-SDJ Document 22 Filed 05/02/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 299
Joseph Benjamin O'DONNELL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8381.

Supreme Court of the United States.

June 1, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-3421

_____________________________

ROBERT EDWARD GODERSKI,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.

David Rimmer, Judge.

March 21, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, OSTERHAUS, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, Joel Arnold, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee and W. Timothy Weekley, Assistant Public 

Defender, Milton, for Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Daniel Krumbholz,

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Exhibit 32.1  Aquentium, Inc.  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of Aquentium, Inc. certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  • the annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended September 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  • the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date:   January 2, 2007 /s/ Mark T. Taggatz Mark T. Taggatz Chief Executive Officer Principal Financial Officer
Derrick Michael ALLEN, Sr., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7873.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 6, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Tara GLASS, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5468

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
### NUMBER 13 - 14 - 00 694 - CV 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________ ALBERTO R. GARZA AND LETICIA I. GARZA, AS NEXT FRIENDS OF ALEXANDRA I. GARZA AND KASSANDRA R. GARZA , A ppellants ,
v. BURCH CONSTRUCTION, INC. , A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Perkes, and Longoria Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant s , Alberto R. Garza and Leticia I. Garza, as next friends of Alexandra I. Garza and Kassandra R. Garza , attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered2

by the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C

- 928

- 08

- A

. Judgment in this cause was signed on September 15, 2014

. Texas Rule of Appellate Proced ure 26. 1 provides that an appeal is perfected when notice of appeal is filed within thirty days after the judgment is signed, unless a motion for new trial is timely filed

. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 26. 1 (a)( 1). Where a timely motion for new trial has been filed, notice of appeal shall be filed within ninety days after the judgment is signed

. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 26. 1 (a). A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good fa ith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by rule 26.1, but within the fifteen

- day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 617

– 18, 619 (1997) (construing the predece ssor to Rule 26). However, appellant must provide a reasonable explanation for the late filing: it is not enough to simply file a notice of appeal. Id. ; Woodard v. Higgins , 140 S.W.3d 462, 462 (Tex. App.

— Amarillo 2004, no pet.); In re B.G. , 104 S.W.3d 56 5, 567 (Tex. App.

—

Waco 2002, no pet.). Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1, appellants ’ notice of appeal was due on October 15, 2014 , but was not filed until December 2, 2014

. On December 3, 2014 , the Clerk of this Court notified appellant s of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant s w ere advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court ’ s letter, the appeal would be dismissed. To date , no response has been received from appellant s

.3

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellants ’ failure to timely perfect their appeal, and appellants ’ failure to respond to this Court ’ s notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.3(a)(c).

PER CURIAM
D elivered and filed the 22nd day of January , 20 15

.
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 DORIAN E. RAMIREZ

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

February 18, 2015

Hon. Analisa Figueroa

Attorney at Law

103 E. Price Rd., Ste. B

Brownsville, TX 78521

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Larry Warner

Attorney at Law

3109 Banyan Circle

Harlingen, TX 78550

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Rene O. Oliveira Jr.

Roerig, Oliveira, & Fisher, LLP

855 W. Price Rd., Ste. 9

Brownsville, TX 78520-8718

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. John L. Shergold

Attorney at Law

1534 E. 6th St., Ste. 103

Brownsville, TX 78520-7239

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Albert Holl

HDBD Law Firm, Ste. 2000N

800 N. Shoreline Blvd.

Corpus Christi, TX 78401

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. David G. Oliveira

Roerig, Oliveira & Fisher, L. L. P.

10225 N. 10th St.

McAllen, TX 78504

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13-15-00015-CV

Tr.Ct.No. 2012-DCL-08930-C

Style: In Re Alfredo Sobrevilla

Enclosed please find the opinion issued by the Court on this date.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER:ch

Enc.

cc: 197th District Court (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Hon. Eric Garza, Cameron County District Clerk (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Hon. J. Rolando Olvera Jr., Presiding Judge, Fifth Administrative Judicial Region

(DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
Anthony Dion COLLINS, Petitioner, v. Francisco LARA, Warden.

No. 19-5549

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 111 (Thursday, June 9, 2022)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 35081]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12557]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 111 / Thursday, June 9, 2022 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 35081]]


                Memorandum of June 1, 2022

                
Delegation of Authority Under Section 506(a)(1) 
                of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, including section 621 of the Foreign 
                Assistance Act of 1961 (FAA), I hereby delegate to the 
                Secretary of State the authority under section 
                506(a)(1) of the FAA to direct the drawdown of up to an 
                aggregate value of $700 million in defense articles and 
                services of the Department of Defense, and military 
                education and training, to provide assistance to 
                Ukraine and to make the determinations required under 
                such section to direct such a drawdown.

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                memorandum in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, June 1, 2022

[FR Doc. 2022-12557
Filed 6-8-22; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
Rayshawn Roshard ROBERTSON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5516

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.