alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., 

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON 

WIRELESS 

 Defendants. 

ERICSSON INC. and 

NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION, 

 Intervenors.

 Case No. 2:23-cv-00470-JRG-RSP 

 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF ALICE SNEDEKER 

Notice is hereby given that Alice Snedeker of the law firm Duane Morris LLP, admitted to 

practice in this Court, enters her appearance as counsel of record for Verizon Communications, 

Inc., Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Wireless and Intervenors Nokia of America Corporation and 

Ericsson Inc. Ms. Snedeker will accept service of all pleadings, discovery, orders, notices, 

correspondence, and other material related to this litigation on their behalf at her contact 

information below. 

Dated: December 12, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Alice Snedeker 

Alice Snedeker 

aesnedeker@duanemorris.com 

DUANE MORRIS LLP 

1075 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 1700 

Atlanta, GA 30309 

Telephone: (404) 253-6900 

Counsel for Verizon Communications, Inc., Cellco 

Partnership dba Verizon Wireless and Intervenors 

Ericsson Inc. and Nokia of America Corporation

Case 2:23-cv-00470-JRG-RSP Document 22 Filed 12/12/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 865
 2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to 

electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF system 

per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on December 12, 2023. 

/s/ Alice Snedeker 

 Alice Snedeker 

Case 2:23-cv-00470-JRG-RSP Document 22 Filed 12/12/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 866
----

| (1)    | The                report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| (2)    | The                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                registrant. |

| Dated:                September 1, 2006 |   |                                                                     |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                    | By:    | /s/                Dennis Highby                                         |
|                                    |   | Dennis                Highby                                             |
|                                    |   | President                and Chief Executive Officer                     |
|                                    |   |                                                                     |
|                                    |   |                                                                     |
|                                    |   |                                                                     |
|                                    | By:    | /s/                Ralph W. Castner                                      |
|                                    |   | Ralph                W. Castner                                          |
|                                    |   | Vice                President and Chief Financial                Officer |

Back      to Form 10-Q/A
DeAndre CHERRY, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5431

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
MR. R. DAVID GUERRERO

JIM WELLS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK

P.O. BOX 2219

ALICE, TX 78333-2219

RE: Case No. 15-0992 DATE: 12/23/2015

COA #: 04-14-00811-CV TC#: 11-04-49987-CV

STYLE:RANDY COLEMAN AND JIM COLEMAN COMPANY

v. RALPH DEAN

Today the Supreme Court of Texas received and

filed Randy Coleman’s motion for extension of time to

file petition for review pursuant to Rule 53.7(f) in

the above numbered and styled case.

FILE COPY
MR. JOSEPH MICHAEL GUERRA

ATTORNEY AT LAW

P.O. BOX 1968

ALICE, TX 78333

RE: Case No. 15-0992 DATE: 12/23/2015

COA #: 04-14-00811-CV TC#: 11-04-49987-CV

STYLE:RANDY COLEMAN AND JIM COLEMAN COMPANY

v. RALPH DEAN

Today the Supreme Court of Texas received and

filed Randy Coleman’s motion for extension of time to

file petition for review pursuant to Rule 53.7(f) in

the above numbered and styled case.

FILE COPY
MR. FRANK WEATHERED

DUNN, WEATHERED, COFFEY

RIVERA & KASPERITIS, PC

611 SOUTH UPPER BROADWAY

CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78401

RE: Case No. 15-0992 DATE: 12/23/2015

COA #: 04-14-00811-CV TC#: 11-04-49987-CV

STYLE:RANDY COLEMAN AND JIM COLEMAN COMPANY

v. RALPH DEAN

Today the Supreme Court of Texas received and

filed Randy Coleman’s motion for extension of time to

file petition for review pursuant to Rule 53.7(f) in

the above numbered and styled case.

FILE COPY
MR. PAUL R. LAWRENCE

LAW OFFICE OF PAUL R. LAWRENCE

2180 NORTH LOOP WEST, SUITE 510

HOUSTON, TX 77007

RE: Case No. 15-0992 DATE: 12/23/2015

COA #: 04-14-00811-CV TC#: 11-04-49987-CV

STYLE:RANDY COLEMAN AND JIM COLEMAN COMPANY

v. RALPH DEAN

Today the Supreme Court of Texas received and

filed Randy Coleman’s motion for extension of time to

file petition for review pursuant to Rule 53.7(f) in

the above numbered and styled case.

FILE COPY
MR. KEITH E. HOTTLE

CLERK, FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

BEXAR COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER

300 DOLOROSA, STE. 3200

SAN ANTONIO, TX 78205

RE: Case No. 15-0992 DATE: 12/23/2015

COA #: 04-14-00811-CV TC#: 11-04-49987-CV

STYLE:RANDY COLEMAN AND JIM COLEMAN COMPANY

v. RALPH DEAN

Today the Supreme Court of Texas received and

filed Randy Coleman’s motion for extension of time to

file petition for review pursuant to Rule 53.7(f) in

the above numbered and styled case.

FILE COPY
MR. CHARLES C. WEBB JR.

WEBB CASON, P.C.

710 MESQUITE

CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78401

RE: Case No. 15-0992 DATE: 12/23/2015

COA #: 04-14-00811-CV TC#: 11-04-49987-CV

STYLE:RANDY COLEMAN AND JIM COLEMAN COMPANY

v. RALPH DEAN

Today the Supreme Court of Texas received and

filed Randy Coleman’s motion for extension of time to

file petition for review pursuant to Rule 53.7(f) in

the above numbered and styled case.

FILE COPY
```

```

----

Updated August 22, 2014
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      For the Three Months Ended March 31,
                                                                 --------------------------------------------
                                                                     1999                             1998
                                                                 -----------                      -----------
<S>                                                              <C>                              <C>        
Basic:
Net income ............................................          $   959,657                      $13,314,362
                                                                 ===========                      ===========
Weighted average number of shares of common stock                                            
outstanding ...........................................           52,910,264                       53,368,370
Net income per common share ...........................          $       .02                      $       .25
                                                                 ===========                      ===========
Diluted:                                                                                     
Net income ............................................          $   959,657                      $13,314,362
                                                                 ===========                      ===========
Weighted average number of shares of common stock                                            
outstanding ...........................................           52,910,264                       53,368,370
Net effect of dilutive stock options--based on                                               
the treasury stock method using average                                                      
market price ..........................................            4,771,134                        7,267,591
                                                                 -----------                      -----------
Total weighted average number of shares of common stock                                      
and common stock equivalents outstanding ..............           57,681,398                       60,635,961
                                                                 ===========                      ===========
Net income per common share ...........................          $       .02                      $       .22
                                                                 ===========                      ===========
</TABLE>
William L. LEWIS, Petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 19-7971.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 4, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District denied.
Eric F. KELLY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-1011.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces denied.
Barlow SMITH, Petitioner, v. Terry KENNEDY.

No. 19-7923.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
D'Marlo Levonne Faulk JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. NORTH CAROLINA.

No. 19-7611.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of North Carolina denied.
Andrew DORSEY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5480

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Siva BLACK, Petitioner, v. Edward DOLAN, Commissioner of Probation Department.

No. 19-7849.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 4, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1720

To amend the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act to provide for

an increase in the authorization of appropriations for community-based

family resource and support grants under that Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 6, 1999

Mr. DEFAZIO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Education and the Workforce

A BILL

To amend the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act

to provide for an increase in the authorization of appropriations for community-based family resource and support grants under that Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1720 IH

1 SECTION 1. INCREASED AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIA2 TIONS FOR COMMUNITY-BASED FAMILY RE3 SOURCE AND SUPPORT GRANTS UNDER THE

4 CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT

5 ACT.

6 Section 210 of the Child Abuse Prevention and

7 Treatment Act is amended by striking ‘‘and such sums’’

8 and all that follows and inserting the following:

9 $100,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2000 through

10 2004.’’.

Æ
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-1786

___________

Jeanette E. Oye, *

*

Petitioner, *

* Petition for Review of 

v. * an Order of the 

* Railroad Retirement Board

Railroad Retirement Board, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Respondent. *

___________

 Submitted: January 6, 2000

 Filed: January 13, 2000 

___________

Before McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and MORRIS SHEPPARD

ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Jeanette E. Oye appeals from the final order of the Railroad Retirement Board

(RRB) denying a waiver of recovery of overpaid benefits. For reversal appellant

argues that the RRB failed to follow its internal policy regarding waiving recovery of

overpayments and defined “against equity and good conscience” too narrowly; she also

challenges the accuracy of the RRB’s calculations.
-2-

Our review of an RRB decision is limited to determining whether it is supported

by substantial evidence, not arbitrary, and reasonably based in the law; the RRB’s

findings of fact, if supported by the evidence and in the absence of fraud, are

conclusive. See 45 U.S.C. § 355(f); King v. Railroad Retirement Bd., 981 F.2d 365,

367 (8th Cir. 1992) (per curiam). We conclude the evidence does not support Oye’s

contention that she relinquished a valuable right and that recovery of the overpayment

would thus be “against equity and good conscience.” See Groseclose v. Bowen, 809

F.2d 502, 506 (8th Cir. 1987) (recovery of social security benefits is “against equity

and good conscience” if, inter alia, beneficiary relinquishes a valuable right); 20 C.F.R.

§ 255.12 (c) (1997) (beneficiary has no entitlement to waiver of recovery of overpaid

RRB benefits; factors considered in determining whether waiver should be granted

include whether individual knew or should have known amount was incorrect and failed

to inquire or advise RRB of incorrectness of amount). 

We further conclude that the RRB’s explanation as to why its waiver policy was

not applicable to Oye is “adequate to satisfy the requirement of reasoned

decisionmaking.” See Reed v. Railroad Retirement Bd., 145 F.3d 373, 375 (D.C. Cir.

1998) (court satisfied with RRB’s explanation of what appeared to be inconsistent

rulings). 

Finally, we conclude the RRB’s calculations were supported by evidence in the

record and Oye submitted no evidence of fraud. We also deny any further

postponement in rendering our decision, because Oye’s request for a temporary

postponement was based upon the RRB’s allegedly incorrect calculations.
-3-

Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

 CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# C_2017384EN.01000802.xml

| 14.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 384/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 384/8

---

EUROPEAN MONITORING CENTRE FOR DRUGS AND DRUG ADDICTION

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2016

(2017/C 384/29)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/publications/annual-account/annual-accounts-2016_en

---
Samory Azikiwe MONDS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8380.

Supreme Court of the United States.

June 1, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/30/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       85,875
COMMITMENTS
  22,382    2,791    1,748   55,325   79,046   79,455   83,585    6,420    2,290

CHANGES FROM 04/23/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        529)
  -1,166     -105        3      641      439     -522      337    1,051      192

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    26.1      3.3      2.0     64.4     92.0     92.5     97.3      7.5      2.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       76)
      12        4        1       40       34       52       39
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/30/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      200,714
COMMITMENTS
  64,628   37,362    1,219  120,183  155,760  186,030  194,341   14,684    6,373

CHANGES FROM 04/23/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,584)
    -405     -386       32    3,142    2,364    2,769    2,010   -1,185     -426

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    32.2     18.6      0.6     59.9     77.6     92.7     96.8      7.3      3.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      146)
      34       17        8       72       50      111       70
```

----

Updated May 3, 2013
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

WARNER RECORDS, INC., et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

ALTICE USA, INC., et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 2:23-cv-00576-JRG-RSP

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED

Index of Exhibits to Wheeler Declaration

in Support of Defendants’ Motion to Transfer Venue

Exhibit A United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York Website

Exhibit B United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Website – Court 

Locator

Exhibit C Altice USA Form 10-K, dated February 23, 2023

Exhibit D Texas Secretary of State Business Organizations Inquiry – Friendship Cable of 

Arkansas, Inc., Friendship Cable of Texas, Inc., and TCA Communications, LLC

Case 2:23-cv-00576-JRG-RSP Document 26-3 Filed 01/29/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 490
EXHIBIT BBB 

Case 2:24-cv-00093-JRG Document 95-14 Filed 10/23/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 4741
Contact

www.linkedin.com/in/derekmcgowan-6a750714 (LinkedIn)

Top Skills

Golang

Linux

Python

Patents

Smart Address Book

Information Association And

Suggestion

Derek McGowan

open source software maintainer

Greater Sacramento

Experience

Docker, Inc

Software Engineer

August 2023 - Present (10 months)

Apple

Software Engineer

June 2020 - August 2023 (3 years 3 months)

Docker, Inc.

Software Engineer

May 2014 - June 2020 (6 years 2 months)

Plaxo

Software Engineer

November 2009 - May 2014 (4 years 7 months)

Designed and implemented big data system and algorithms to find updates

for Plaxo user's address books. Choose Cassandra and Hadoop to store

and process large volume of data and worked closely with operations to

setup and configure the cluster. Designed new service-based architecture for

Plaxo backend services. Built cross language compilation process to allow

legacy C++ code base to be used alongside newer Python and Java code

implementations. Implemented user interface for Plaxo iPhone application.

SocialGuides

Co-founder

November 2008 - October 2009 (1 year)

Lead small development team through startup incubator Shotput Ventures

in Atlanta. Wrote scoring algorithm for Restaurant/Hotel sorting based on

user activity. Built iPhone application for location based searching. Built

backend APIs for supporting multiple mobile clients. Administered Linux test

and development server.

Travature

Software Developer

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:24-cv-00093-JRG Document 95-14 Filed 10/23/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 4742 Case 7:24-cv-00030-ADA-DTG Document 32-34 Filed 06/07/24 Page 2 of 3
September 2007 - October 2008 (1 year 2 months)

Worked on airfare metasearch engine in java and website front-end pages

for hotels and restaurants. Built backend for hotel and restaurant rating and

commenting. Built and released iPhone application for wiki travel guides as

well as restaurant and hotel lookup. Wrote javascript based open social travel

trivia game.

Education

San Diego State University-California State University

Computer Engineering · (2005 - 2009)

Page 2 of 2

Case 2:24-cv-00093-JRG Document 95-14 Filed 10/23/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 4743 Case 7:24-cv-00030-ADA-DTG Document 32-34 Filed 06/07/24 Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

VIRTAMOVE, CORP.,

Plaintiff,

v. 

HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE 

COMPANY,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-CV-00093-JRG

(LEAD CASE)

VIRTAMOVE, CORP.,

Plaintiff,

v. 

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS 

MACHINES CORP.,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-CV-00064-JRG

(MEMBER CASE)

ORDER

Before the Court is the Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Opposition and Reply 

to Motion to Transfer (Dkt. 87) (the “Motion for Extension”) filed by Plaintiff VirtaMove, Corp. 

and Defendant Hewlett Packard Enterprise (“Defendant” or “HPE”) (collectively, the “Parties”).

(Dkt. No. 95.) In the Motion for Extension, the Parties request a one-week extension of time for

Plaintiff to file its response to Defendant HPE’s Motion to Transfer Venue to the Northern District 

of California and a one-week extension for Defendant to file its reply in support of its motion to 

transfer. (Id.) Specifically, the Parties ask that Plaintiff’s deadline to file its response be extended 

to November 5, 2024, and Defendant’s deadline to reply in support of its motion to transfer be 

extended to November 19, 2024. (Id.) 

Case 2:24-cv-00093-JRG Document 100 Filed 10/29/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 4809
2

Having considered the Motion for Extension, and noting its joint nature, the Court finds 

that it should be and hereby is GRANTED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s deadline 

to file its response be extended up to and including November 5, 2024, and Defendant’s deadline 

to reply in support of its motion to transfer be extended up to and including November 19, 2024. 

.

____________________________________

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 29th day of October, 2024.

Case 2:24-cv-00093-JRG Document 100 Filed 10/29/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 4810