alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w34






Exhibit 10.34




	 	 	 

	

	 	Corporate Fuels & By-Products

220 West Main Street

Louisville, KY40202





April 1, 2009




Armstrong Coal Company

407 Brown Road

Madisonville, Kentucky 42131

Attn: Mr. Kenny Allen





	 	 	Ref: LG&E/KU Coal Supply Agreement No. J07032 Amendment 
       
For Temporary Price Change




Dear Kenny:



This letter is to amend the Base Price parameters noted below of the above referenced Coal Supply
Agreement, but only with respect to the time period as described below.



Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company agree the following revised
pricing will apply to all coal shipped via truck from Midway Mine to Armstrong Dock (formerly known
as Smallhous Dock) during the time period from April 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.



From April 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009 the Base Price shall be the
Base Price plus adjustment (per Section 8.4), plus $1.90 per ton, FOB Barge Armstrong
Dock located at Mile Point 76.6 on the Green River (which Base Price covers the coal, trucking cost
to deliver the coal to Armstrong Dock and all costs to transload the coal into barges at Armstrong
Dock). The Base Price effective April 1, 2009 shall be $29.50 per ton and
may be adjusted July 1 and October 1, 2009.



In all other respects, the terms, pricing and other conditions of the Coal Supply Agreement
shall remain the same.



Please indicate your agreement to these terms by signing where indicated on both of the originals
and returning both originals to me. I will have them signed on behalf of LG&E/KU and return a fully
executed original to you.





 









 








Sincerely,


/s/ W. G. Gilbert, Jr.
 

W. G. Gilbert, Jr.

Senior Fuels and Transportation Administrator






	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 

	Acknowledged and agreed:	 	 	 	Louisville Gas and Electric Company
	Armstrong Coal Company	 	 	 	Kentucky Utilities Company
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Kenneth E. Allen
	 	 	 	By:
	 	/s/ 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Title:

	 	V. P. Operations
	 	 	 	Title:
	 	Director, Corporate Fuels & By-Products	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Date:

	 	4-3-2009
	 	 	 	Date:
	 	4/7/09
No. 6:24-cv-00033

Alan Headman,

Plaintiff,

v.

Federal Bureau of Investigations et al.,

Defendants.

ORD ER

Plaintiff Alan Headman filed this action claiming that he has 

been denied a right to jury trial in a state court matter and seeking 

declaratory and injunctive relief requiring the Federal Bureau of 

Investigations to conduct an investigation of that supposed denial. 

Doc. 1. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge 

K. Nicole Mitchell pursuant to a standing order. Plaintiff moved 

for emergency preliminary injunctive relief (Doc. 2) and moved 

for a speedy hearing (Doc. 7). Later, plaintiff again moved for an

emergency hearing on his request for injunctive relief (Doc. 18).

On July 24, 2024, the magistrate judge issued a report recommending that plaintiff’s motions for emergency preliminary injunctive relief and motion for speedy hearing be denied. Doc. 28. 

Plaintiff filed written objections. Doc. 29. The court reviews objected-to portions of the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation de novo. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

In his objections, plaintiff does not address any specific findings or conclusions in the report. Plaintiff does not respond to the 

report’s finding that he has not proven any of the four prerequisites for establishing that a preliminary injunction is appropriate. 

Instead, plaintiff asserts that the court is avoiding resolution of his 

claims and preventing him from proceeding to trial.

The prerequisites for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction are: (1) a substantial likelihood of success on 

the merits; (2) a substantial threat that the movant will suffer 

Case 6:24-cv-00033-JCB-KNM Document 35 Filed 09/23/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 395
- 2 -

irreparable injury if the injunction is not granted; (3) that the 

threatened injury to the movant outweighs any damage that the 

injunction may cause for the nonmovant; and (4) that the injunction will not disserve the public interest. Affiliated Prof’l Home 

Health Care Agency v. Shalala, 164 F.3d 282, 285 (5th Cir. 1999); 

see also Clark v. Prichard, 812 F.2d 991, 993 (5th Cir. 1987). “The 

denial of a preliminary injunction will be upheld where the movant has failed sufficiently to establish any one of the four criteria.” 

Black Fire Fighters Ass’n v. City of Dallas, 905 F.2d 63, 65 (5th Cir. 

1990) (emphasis in original). Here, plaintiff has not established 

any of the prerequisites for a preliminary injunction.

Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report de novo, and 

being satisfied that it contains no error, the court overrules plaintiff’s objections and accepts the report’s findings and recommendation. The court denies plaintiff’s motion for emergency preliminary injunctive relief (Doc. 2), motion for speedy hearing (Doc. 

7), and motion for an emergency hearing on preliminary injunctive relief (Doc. 18).

So ordered by the court on September 23, 2024.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:24-cv-00033-JCB-KNM Document 35 Filed 09/23/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 396
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. AD22-8-000]

As announced in the Notice of Technical Conference issued in this proceeding on April 21, 2022, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) will convene a Commissioner-led technical conference regarding transmission planning and cost management for transmission facilities developed through local or regional transmission planning processes in the above-captioned proceeding on October 6, 2022, from approximately 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time. In the Notice of Technical Conference, individuals interested in participating as panelists were instructed to submit a self-nomination email by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on June 16, 2022.

                    In this supplemental notice we extend the date for individuals interested in participating as panelists to submit a self-nomination by 45 days. Individuals interested in participating as panelists should submit a self-nomination email by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on August 1, 2022, to                     *john.riehl@ferc.gov.*                     Each nomination should state the proposed panelist's name, contact information, organizational affiliation, and what topics the proposed panelist would speak on. A separate notice will be issued to establish technical conference topics and details.                

                    For more information about this technical conference, please contact John Riehl at                     *john.riehl@ferc.gov*                     or (202) 502-6026. For information related to logistics, please contact Sarah McKinley at                     *sarah.mckinley@ferc.gov or*                     (202) 502-8368.                

Dated: June 6, 2022.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-12517 Filed 6-9-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA, Petitioner v. Mark MANN, et al.

No. 18-1465

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

```

----

Updated October 17, 2014
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

LYLIE LEE (14)

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NUMBER 4:23-CR-00231 

ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY

The Court referred this matter to the United States Magistrate Judge for administration of 

a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a 

hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court accept 

Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on Count One of the Fifth Superseding 

Indictment. 

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings. 

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of 

the United States Magistrate Judge. The court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance

of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report.

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Lylie Lee GUILTY

of Count One of the Fifth Superseding Indictment, charging a violation of Title 21 U.S.C. § 846 -

Conspiracy to Distribute or Possess with Intent to Distribute Fentanyl.

Case 4:23-cr-00231-ALM-AGD Document 592 Filed 12/02/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:

1433
Case 4:23-cr-00231-ALM-AGD Document 592 Filed 12/02/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:

1434
Steve CHABOT, et al., Appellants, v. OHIO A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE, et al.

No. 19-110

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion of Stephen M. Shapiro for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Judgment vacated, and cases remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio for further consideration in light of *Rucho* v. *Common Cause* , 588 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 2484, 204 L.Ed.2d 931 (2019).
Exhibit 21



G&L Realty Corp.

List of Subsidiaries

April 30, 2004



|1. | G&L Hampden, Inc., a Delaware corporation
|-- | -----------------------------------------

|2. | G&L Hampden, LLC a Delaware limited liability company
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------

|3. | G&L Realty Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------

|4. | G&L Medical, Inc., a Delaware corporation
|-- | -----------------------------------------

|5. | G&L Gardens, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------

|6. | G&L Senior Care, Inc., a Delaware corporation
|-- | ---------------------------------------------

|7. | G&L Medical Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------

|8. | 435 N. Roxbury Drive, Ltd., a California limited partnership
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------

|9. | G&L - Grabel San Pedro, LLC
|-- | ---------------------------

|10. | G&L Burbank, LLC
|--- | ----------------

|11. | G&L Burbank Managers Corp., a California corporation
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------

|12. | G&L Holy Cross, LLC
|--- | -------------------

|13. | G&L Holy Cross Managers Corp., a California corporation
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------

|14. | G&L Tustin, LLC
|--- | ---------------

|15. | G&L Tustin Managers Corp., a California corporation
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------

|16. | G&L Valencia, LLC
|--- | -----------------

|17. | G&L Penasquitos, LLC
|--- | --------------------

|18. | G&L Hoquiam, LLC
|--- | ----------------

|19. | G&L Lyons, LLC
|--- | --------------

|20. | G&L Coronado (1998), LLC
|--- | ------------------------

|21. | G&L Parsons on Eagle Run, LLC
|--- | -----------------------------

|22. | G&L Parsons on Eagle Run, Inc.
|--- | ------------------------------

|23. | Lakeview Associates, LLC
|--- | ------------------------

|24. | Tustin Heritage Park, LLC
|--- | -------------------------

|25. | G&L Massachusetts, LLC
|--- | ----------------------

|26. | G&L Aspen, LLC
|--- | --------------

|27. | G&L Tustin II, LLC
|--- | ------------------

|28. | G&L Tustin III, LLC
|--- | -------------------

|29. | G&L Senior Care Partnership, L.P.
|--- | ---------------------------------

|30. | G&L St. Thomas More, Inc.
|--- | -------------------------

|31. | St. Thomas More, Inc.
|--- | ---------------------

|32. | G&L Radius Realty, LLC
|--- | ----------------------

|33. | GLR/Yorba Linda, LLC
|--- | --------------------

|34. | 405 Bedford, LLC
|--- | ----------------

|35. | 415 Bedford, LLC
|--- | ----------------

|36. | 416 Bedford, LLC
|--- | ----------------

|37. | 435 Bedford, LLC
|--- | ----------------

|38. | G&L 436 Bedford, LLC
|--- | --------------------

|39. | G&L Sherman Oaks, LLC
|--- | ---------------------

|40. | G&L 4150 Regents, LLC
|--- | ---------------------
Thomas POWERS, Petitioner, v. Travis SMITH, et al.

No. 19-7901.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Vinodh RAGHUBIR, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

No. 19-5140

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# C_2017384EN.01000102.xml

| 14.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 384/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 384/1

---

BIO-BASED INDUSTRIES JOINT UNDERTAKING

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2016

(2017/C 384/02)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://www.bbi-europe.eu/sites/default/files/bbi_ju_annual_accounts_2016.pdf

---
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DEBORA L. PATZER

, Appellant,

v.

MIA REAL HOLDINGS, LLC, TRANS GLOBAL FINANCIAL, LLC, and

THIRD FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND

, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 16

- 4011

[ January 25, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Susan R. Lubitz , Judge; L.T. Case No.

502011CA016765XXXXMB

.

Jeffrey M. Siskind of the Law Office of Jeffrey M. Siskind, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Steven Sar rell of Sarrell, Sarrell & Bender, P.L., Boca Raton, for appellees Mia Real Holdings, LLC and Trans Global Financial, LLC.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

W ARNER
, M AY and D AMOORGIAN

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 Eastern District of Texas VIRTAMOVE, CORP. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP. 2:24-cv-00064-JRG VIRTAMOVE, CORP. 04/16/2024 /s/ Jacob Buczko Jacob Buczko, CA SBN 269408

Russ August & Kabat 

12424 Wilshire Blvd, 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, California 90025

jbuczko@raklaw.com (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:24-cv-00064-JRG Document 18 Filed 04/16/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 135
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Wave Systems Corp.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
Nos. 333-38265, 333-28819, and 333-20017 on Form S-3 and Nos. 333-68911,
333-69041, 33-97612, 333-11611 and 333-11609 on Form S-8, of our report
dated March 10, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Wave
Systems Corp. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity
(deficiency) and other comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999 and for the period
from February 12, 1988 (inception) through December 31, 1999 which report
appears in the December 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of Wave Systems
Corp.


                                                         KPMG LLP

                                                         /s/ KPMG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 21, 2000
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 11


                               G&L Realty Corp.
                       Computation of Per Share Earnings
                         Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
                                 June 30, 1999
                     (In thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                             Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended
                                                  June 30,              June 30,
                                            --------------------   -------------------
                                              1999        1998       1999       1998
                                            ---------   --------   --------   --------

<S>                                         <C>         <C>        <C>        <C>
Net  Income                                   $1,415     $2,597    $ 3,066    $ 4,963

Less: Preferred Dividends
 10.25% Series A Cumulative Preferred           (958)      (958)    (1,916)    (1,916)
   9.8% Series B Cumulative Preferred           (845)      (845)    (1,690)    (1,690)
                                              -------    -------   --------   --------
Net (loss) income available to common         $ (388)    $  794    $  (540)   $ 1,357
 shareholders                                 =======    =======   ========   ========

Options outstanding                              214        234        214        234
                                              =======    =======   ========   ========
Weighted average exercise price               $14.49     $14.49    $ 14.49    $ 14.49
                                              =======    =======   ========   ========
Proceeds upon exercise of options             $3,101     $3,391    $ 3,101    $ 3,391
                                              =======    =======   ========   ========
Treasury stock shares                            203        193        199        181
                                              =======    =======   ========   ========
Common share equivalents                          11         41         15         53
Average shares outstanding                     3,937      4,122      3,957      4,124
                                              -------    -------   --------   --------
Total common and common share                  3,949      4,163      3,971      4,177
 equivalents outstanding                      =======    =======   ========   ========

Per share earnings data:
------------------------

Basic                                         $(0.10)    $ 0.19    $ (0.14)   $  0.33
                                              =======    =======   ========   ========
Fully diluted                                 $(0.10)    $ 0.19    $ (0.14)   $  0.32
                                              =======    =======   ========   ========
</TABLE>
# C_2017029EN.01001401.xml

| 28.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 29/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 29/14

---

Commission notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 29/12)

| Member State | France |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Lannion – Paris (Orly) |
| Period of validity of the contract | From 23 September 2017 to 22 September 2021 |
| Deadline for the submission of applications and tenders | 3 April 2017 by 17.00 local time |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained | Aéroport de Lannion – Côte de Granit |
| Syndicat Mixte de l’Aéroport – EPIC |
| Avenue Pierre Marzin |
| 22300 Lannion |
| FRANCE |
| Tel. +33 296058234 |
| Fax +33 296058299 |
| Email: akguegan.aeroportlannion@orange.fr |

Member State

France

Route concerned

Lannion – Paris (Orly)

Period of validity of the contract

From 23 September 2017 to 22 September 2021

Deadline for the submission of applications and tenders

3 April 2017 by 17.00 local time

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained

Aéroport de Lannion – Côte de Granit

Syndicat Mixte de l’Aéroport – EPIC

Avenue Pierre Marzin

22300 Lannion

FRANCE

Tel. +33 296058234

Fax +33 296058299

Email: akguegan.aeroportlannion@orange.fr

---
Phillip Boyd CASHION, Petitioner, v. TEXAS; and

Phillip Boyd Cashion, Petitioner, v. Texas.

No. 19-7547.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Sixth District denied.