alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Page 1

HAMID HAJEBIAN, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION 

§ 

§ 

Plaintiff, § Case No. 4:24-cv-00036-SDJ

§

v. § 

§ 

CREDIT UNION OF TEXAS § JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

§ 

Defendant. § 

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

Plaintiff Hamid Hajebian (“Plaintiff”), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant 

to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby voluntarily dismisses all 

claims and causes of action asserted in Plaintiff’s Original Complaint in the above-styled action, 

with prejudice. Each party to bear their own fees and costs. 

Respectfully submitted this 6th day of June, 2024. 

_______________________________ 

S. TOMIYO STONER

Email: tstoner@undatuntedlaw.com

UNDAUNTED LAW FIRM, P.C. 

400 E. Las Colinas Blvd. 

Suite 491 

Irving, Texas 75039 

Telephone: (844) 232-4332 

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF 

Case 4:24-cv-00036-SDJ Document 14 Filed 06/06/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 41
NOTICE DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Page 2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on June 6, 2024, I electronically filed the foregoing document with 

the Clerk of Court for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, 

Sherman Division, using the electronic case filing system of the Court. The electronic case 

filing system will send a “Notice of Electronic Filing” to the following attorneys of record and 

others who have requested notice who have consented in writing to accept the Notice as service 

of this document by electronic means: 

Rogge Dunn 

Katie Blakey

ROGGE DUNN GROUP, 

PC 500 N. Akard, Suite 1900 

Dallas, Texas 75201-6629 

Telephone: (214) 888-5000 

Facsimile: (214) 220-3833 

S. TOMIYO STONER

Case 4:24-cv-00036-SDJ Document 14 Filed 06/06/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 42
Opinion issued July 26, 2012

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-12-00471-CV

———————————

LATOYA SMITH AND MELVIN SMITH, Appellants

V.

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE TO 

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO LASALLE 

BANK, N.A. AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS OF THE 

MLMI TRUST, MORTGAGE LOAN ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES,

SERIES 2006-RMI, Appellee

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 12-CCV-047150

MEMORANDUM OPINION
2

Appellants, LaToya Smith and Melvin Smith, have neither paid the required

filing fee for this appeal nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (“A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from 

paying costs must pay—at the time an item is presented for filing—whatever fees 

are required by statute or Supreme Court order.”), 20.1 (listing requirements for 

establishing indigence); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207 (Vernon Supp. 

2011), § 51.941(a) (Vernon 2005), § 101.041 (Vernon Supp. 2011) (listing fees in 

court of appeals); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme 

Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict 

Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R.

APP. P. app. A § B(1) (listing fees in court of appeals). The filing fee was due on 

June 4, 2012. After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal for 

failure to pay the filing fee, appellants did not adequately respond. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal 

of case).

We dismiss the appeal for failure to pay the filing fee. We dismiss any 

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Higley, Sharp, and Huddle.
Case 4:24-cr-00025-ALM-AGD Document 1 Filed 01/17/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 592 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 592

 Recognizing the religious and historical significance of the festival 
                               of Diwali.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 14, 2012

    Mr. Warner (for himself and Mr. Cornyn) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing the religious and historical significance of the festival 
                               of Diwali.

Whereas Diwali, a festival of great significance to Indian Americans and South 
        Asian Americans, is celebrated annually by Hindus, Sikhs, and Jains 
        throughout India, the United States, and the world;
Whereas Diwali is a festival of lights that marks the beginning of the Hindu new 
        year, during which celebrants light small oil lamps, place the lamps 
        around the home, and pray for health, knowledge, peace, wealth, and 
        prosperity in the new year;
Whereas the lights symbolize the light of knowledge within the individual that 
        overwhelms the darkness of ignorance, empowering each celebrant to do 
        good deeds and show compassion to others;
Whereas Diwali falls on the last day of the last month in the lunar calendar and 
        is celebrated as a day of thanksgiving for the homecoming of the Lord 
        Rama and worship of Lord Ganesha, the remover of obstacles and bestower 
        of blessings, at the beginning of the new year for many Hindus;
Whereas, for Sikhs, Diwali is celebrated as Bandhi Chhor Diwas (The Celebration 
        of Freedom), in honor of the release from prison of the sixth guru, Guru 
        Hargobind; and
Whereas, for Jains, Diwali marks the anniversary of the attainment of moksha, or 
        liberation, by Mahavira, the last of the Tirthankaras (the great 
        teachers of Jain dharma), at the end of his life in 527 B.C.: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes the religious and historical significance of 
        the festival of Diwali; and
            (2) in observance of Diwali, the festival of lights, 
        expresses its deepest respect for Indian Americans and South 
        Asian Americans, as well as fellow countrymen and diaspora 
        throughout the world on this significant occasion.
                                 <all>
```
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION 

DANNY JOHNSTON, 

 Plaintiff / Counter-Defendant, 

v. 

PATRICIA ANN JOHNSTON, 

 Defendant / Counter-Plaintiff, 

v. 

EAST TEXAS OIL FIELD 

CONSTRUCTION, LLC, 

 Counter-Defendant. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Case No. 6:23-cv-413-JDK 

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Before the Court is Counter-Defendants Danny Johnston and East Texas Oil 

Field Construction, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). Docket No. 17. This case was 

referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell for findings of fact, 

conclusions of law, and recommendations for disposition. 

On April 19, 2024, Judge Mitchell issued a Report recommending that the 

Court deny the motion to dismiss. Docket No. 41. A copy of the Report was sent by 

certified mail to the address provided by Counter-Defendants. Mr. Johnston filed an 

acknowledgment of receipt as to the Report on April 19, 2024. Docket No. 43. No 

written objections have been received. 

Case 6:23-cv-00413-JDK-KNM Document 48 Filed 05/08/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 469
2 

This Court reviews the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge de 

novo only if a party objects within fourteen days of service of the Report and 

Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In conducting a de novo review, the Court 

examines the entire record and makes an independent assessment under the law. 

Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), 

superseded on other grounds by statute, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (extending the time to 

file objections from ten to fourteen days). 

Here, no objections were filed. The Court therefore reviews the Magistrate 

Judge’s findings for clear error or abuse of discretion and reviews the legal 

conclusions to determine whether they are contrary to law. See United States v. 

Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918 (1989) (holding 

that, if no objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Report are filed, the standard of review 

is “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law”). 

Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and the record in this case, 

the Court finds no clear error or abuse of discretion and no conclusions contrary to 

law. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the 

United States Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 41) as the findings of this Court and 

DENIES Counter-Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Docket No. 17). 

So ordered and signed on this 

May 8, 2024

Case 6:23-cv-00413-JDK-KNM Document 48 Filed 05/08/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 470
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.2


June 20, 2003

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL:                             PAUL RICHARDSON

Dear Paul,

RE: CHANGE TO TERMS & CONDITIONS

Further to your discussions with myself I am pleased to be able to confirm to
you in writing the following changes to your terms and conditions of employment.

JOB TITLE:       President - US Division

REPORTING TO:    John Sheppard - COO & President of Cott Corporation

SALARY:          $336,000

BONUS TARGET:    $375,000

BONUS LEVEL:     100% effective from 18th July 2003

PRORATED:        Jan 1st to July 18th 2003          Based on Corporate Results
                 July 18th to December 31st 2003    Based on:
                                                [ ] US Division Results OR
                                                [X] Corporate Results

LOCATION:        Tampa, FL

EFFECTIVE DATE:  July 18, 2003

This letter constitutes an amendment to your contract of employment and all
other terms and conditions will remain as previously stated. I enclose two
copies of this letter, which you should sign, returning one to me and retaining
the other one for your reference.

Paul, I would like to take this opportunity to congratulate you and wish you
every success in your new position. Please contact me if you have any queries
with regard to the above.

Yours sincerely,
FOR COTT CORPORATION

/s/ Colin D. Walker
-------------------
Colin Walker
SVP, Corporate Resources


I accept the terms and conditions as outlined in the above letter.

NAME (PLEASE PRINT):    PAUL RICHARDSON
                        ---------------
SIGNED:                 /S/ PAUL RICHARDSON
                        -------------------
DATE:                   OCTOBER 16, 2003
                        ----------------
Phillip CAMILLO-AMISANO, petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8159.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 15, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Terry James SULLIVAN, Petitioner, v. CITY OF MISSOULA, Montana.

No. 19-5424.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Montana denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 01/21/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      528,032
COMMITMENTS
 101,471   29,354  145,137  263,382  342,543  509,990  517,034   18,042   10,998

CHANGES FROM 01/14/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -4,503)
   1,151    1,710    3,443   -5,365   -8,034     -771   -2,881   -3,732   -1,622

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    19.2      5.6     27.5     49.9     64.9     96.6     97.9      3.4      2.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      142)
      37       34       57       65       57      132      120
```

----

Updated January 24, 2014
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Toll-Free Phone Lines Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. This meeting will be held via teleconference.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, July 12, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rosalind Matherne at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-4115.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Toll-Free Phone Lines Project Committee will be held Tuesday, July 12, 2022, at 3:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with Rosalind Matherne. For more information, please contact Rosalind Matherne at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-4115, or write TAP Office, 1111 Constitution Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or contact us at the website:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*                     The agenda will include various IRS issues.                

Dated: June 7, 2022.

Kevin Brown,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2022-12635 Filed 6-10-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 31, 2014

t0127

Order 

Clerk

January 31, 2014

147609

FRASCO, CAPONIGRO, WINEMAN,

& SCHEIBLE, PLLC,

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant- Appellee,

v SC: 147609

COA: 308405

Oakland CC: 2010-109156-CK

IGC MANAGEMENT, INC.,

Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/

Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

J. CHRISTIAN HAUSER,

Defendant/Third-Party

Defendant-Appellee,

and

MURRAY CONNELL,

Defendant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 16, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 65 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 65

  Expressing the sense of Congress regarding outreach to families of 
 members of the Armed Forces killed in action in Iraq and Afghanistan, 
                        and in other conflicts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 15, 2013

 Mr. Calvert submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of Congress regarding outreach to families of 
 members of the Armed Forces killed in action in Iraq and Afghanistan, 
                        and in other conflicts.

Whereas the human burden of the Global War on Terrorism has been 
        disproportionately borne by the less than one percent of Americans who 
        serve in the military;
Whereas 2,276 members of the Armed Forces have been killed in Afghanistan and 
        4,474 members of the Armed Forces killed in Iraq as of November 11th, 
        2013;
Whereas the strength of our military is built upon the men and women who serve 
        in uniform and the families who support them; and
Whereas supporting those families who have lost loved ones in the Global War on 
        Terrorism demonstrates the commitment of the American people to those 
        families now and in the future: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) all families that have lost loved ones in uniform 
        should be recognized for their sacrifices and for their 
        dedicated and patriotic support of the United States;
            (2) local communities should recognize and support those 
        families that have lost a loved one in combat; and
            (3) the President should encourage military bases around 
        the country to organize and host events to recognize and 
        commemorate the sacrifices of members of the Armed Forces of 
        all services, and to encourage the attendance of families 
        within the local area that have lost loved ones in combat to 
        attend such commemorations.
                                 <all>
```
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 18 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the National Peace Officers’ 

Memorial Service. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2013 

Mr. BARLETTA (for himself and Ms. NORTON) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the National 

Peace Officers’ Memorial Service. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF THE CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NA4 TIONAL PEACE OFFICERS’ MEMORIAL SERV5 ICE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Grand Lodge of the Fra7 ternal Order of Police and its auxiliary (in this resolution 

8 referred to as the ‘‘sponsor’’) shall be permitted to sponsor 

9 a public event, the 32nd Annual National Peace Officers’ 

10 Memorial Service (in this resolution referred to as the 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HCON 18 IH 

1 ‘‘event’’), on the Capitol Grounds, in order to honor the 

2 law enforcement officers who died in the line of duty dur3 ing 2012. 

4 (b) DATE OF EVENT.—The event shall be held on 

5 May 15, 2013, or on such other date as the Speaker of 

6 the House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules 

7 and Administration of the Senate jointly designate. 

8 SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Under conditions to be prescribed 

10 by the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police 

11 Board, the event shall be— 

12 (1) free of admission charge and open to the 

13 public; and 

14 (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of 

15 Congress. 

16 (b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—The sponsor shall 

17 assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities 

18 incident to all activities associated with the event. 

19 SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS. 

20 Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Cap21 itol, the sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol 

22 Grounds such stage, sound amplification devices, and 

23 other related structures and equipment, as may be re24 quired for the event. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•HCON 18 IH 

1 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

2 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce3 ment of the restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of 

4 title 40, United States Code, concerning sales, advertise5 ments, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, 

6 as well as other restrictions applicable to the Capitol 

7 Grounds, in connection with the event. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF 6/30/97 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND 
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,620
<ALLOWANCES>                                       162
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,007
<PP&E>                                           5,274
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,104
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,528
<BONDS>                                          4,875
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            42
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,680
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,104
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,363
<CGS>                                           16,644
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,644
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,610
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 293
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    816
<INCOME-TAX>                                       384
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                432
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       432
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .104
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .104
        

</TABLE>
Julio SOLORZANO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8080.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.