alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Charles BURTON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8411.

Supreme Court of the United States.

June 1, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Kenney SHI LAI, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 19-8070.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 26, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification        Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002        (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of
Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Wave Systems Corp. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: March 15, 2011

/s/ STEVEN K. SPRAGUEName:

Steven K. Sprague Chief Executive OfficerDated: March 15, 2011

/s/ GERARD T. FEENEYName:

Gerard T. Feeney Chief Financial Officer


The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.

A
signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Wave Systems Corp. and will be retained by Wave Systems Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 05/28/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      389,387
COMMITMENTS
  98,250  159,936   91,341  167,326  103,753  356,917  355,030   32,470   34,357

CHANGES FROM 05/21/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -45,601)
 -13,218   -5,145  -11,546  -23,139  -28,014  -47,903  -44,705    2,302     -896

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    25.2     41.1     23.5     43.0     26.6     91.7     91.2      8.3      8.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      164)
      46       73       66       33       30      119      138
```

----

Updated May 31, 2013
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 620 

To authorize Harry Reid, a Senator from the State of Nevada, to administer 

the oath of office of President of the Senate pro tempore to Patrick 

J. Leahy, a Senator from the State of Vermont. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 17, 2012 

Mr. MCCONNELL (for himself and Mr. DURBIN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize Harry Reid, a Senator from the State of Nevada, to administer the oath of office of President of 

the Senate pro tempore to Patrick J. Leahy, a Senator 

from the State of Vermont. 

1 Resolved, That Harry Reid, a Senator from the State 

2 of Nevada, is hereby authorized to administer the oath of 

3 office of President of the Senate Pro Tempore to Patrick 

4 J. Leahy, a Senator from the State of Vermont. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-20378

Conference Calendar

 

AARON LAMON MUSE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GEORGE ARANDA; ELLIOTT WILSON; KENNETH REAGANS; GLENDA

RANDLE; MARGO GREEN; GARY J. GOMEZ,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-99-CV-1970

--------------------

June 14, 2001

Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Aaron Muse, Texas prisoner # 490380, appeals the district

court’s interlocutory order in which the court denied Muse’s

motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO) and/or a

preliminary injunction, his motions for the production of

documents and to compel the production of documents, and his

motion for the entry of a default judgment.

This court must sua sponte examine the basis of its

jurisdiction, even if not raised by the parties. Mosley v.
No. 00-20378

-2-

Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). We lack jurisdiction

to review the denial of Muse’s motion for a TRO and his discovery

motions. See Matter of Lieb, 915 F.2d 180, 183 (5th Cir. 1990);

Texaco, Inc. v. Louisiana Land and Exploration Co., 995 F.2d 43,

43 (5th Cir. 1993); see also 28 U.S.C. 1292. Appellate

jurisdiction also does not exist to review the denial of his

motion for the entry of a default judgment. See Adult Film Ass'n

of America, Inc. v. Thetford, 776 F.2d 113, 115 (5th Cir. 1985). 

The denial of his request for a preliminary injunction was not an

abuse of discretion. Black Fire Fighters Ass’n v. City of

Dallas, 905 F.2d 63, 65 (5th Cir. 1990). 

Muse’s appeal from the denial of his motion for a TRO, his

discovery motions, and his motion for a default judgment is

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. The denial of his motion for

a preliminary injunction is AFFIRMED.
##### Form 10-Q Table of Contents

Exhibit 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of SeaBright Insurance Holdings, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Joseph S. De Vita,
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 15, 2006

| |  |  |                                                                                                                       
| |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |  | /s/ Joseph S. De VitaJoseph S. De Vita
          Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officerand Assistant Secretary

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic
version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to SeaBright Insurance Holdings, Inc. and will
be retained by SeaBright Inhsurance Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF MARCH 31, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND DECEMBER 31,
1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,823,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               24,270,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,342,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                     126,454,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,373,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             148,695,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,339,000
<BONDS>                                    120,981,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        41,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,051,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               148,965,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,855,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,666,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,429,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,469,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,106,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,106,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,106,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Reginald Edward GREEN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7960.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 27 

Supporting the formation of a bipartisan Presidential Commission to study 

the establishment of a National Museum of the American People. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 19, 2013 

Mr. MORAN (for himself, Mr. DUNCAN of Tennessee, Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. WOLF, Mr. CONNOLLY, Ms. NORTON, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. CICILLINE, Mr. WALZ, Mr. BISHOP of 

New York, Mr. COLE, and Mr. GERLACH) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Supporting the formation of a bipartisan Presidential Commission to study the establishment of a National Museum 

of the American People. 

Whereas the United States was created and built by peoples 

from every land, and these people made this Nation the 

world’s economic, military, scientific, and cultural leader; 

Whereas Canada and Mexico, the nations bordering the 

United States, have major museums in or near their capital cities telling the story of the making of their peoples; 

Whereas the people of the United States do not have a comprehensive and accurate picture of all the peoples who 

created and continue to build the Nation; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 27 IH 

Whereas few foreigners know the story of the peoples who 

came to be citizens of the United States, nor the story 

of the people from their own nations who came to this 

land; 

Whereas a museum telling the story of the making of the 

people of the United States and celebrating all who migrated and settled in the present day United States, from 

the very first to the most recent, belongs near the National Mall in Washington, DC; 

Whereas the National Museum of the American People would 

serve as a resource to assist State, local, and ethnic museums throughout the Nation present exhibits that celebrate the heritage of the people of the United States; 

Whereas non-Federal sources will be sought to provide full 

funding for a Presidential Commission to study establishment of the Museum and that such sums will commence 

when the President signs an Executive order creating a 

bipartisan Presidential Commission; and 

Whereas non-Federal sources are anticipated to provide full 

funding to design and build the Museum, its exhibitions 

and its components: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress supports the establishment of 

3 a bipartisan Presidential Commission to study the estab4 lishment of a National Museum of the American People 

5 to tell the immigration and migration stories of all people 

6 in the United States. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Opinion Research Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Douglas L. Cox, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |         |  |                                                     
|---------------------- |  | ------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 3, 2004 |  | Signed: |  | /s/ Douglas L. Cox                                  
|                       |  | Name:   |  | Douglas L. Cox                                      
|                       |  | Title:  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET-WTI - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                      Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/29/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      509,038
COMMITMENTS
  86,012   38,309  105,235  300,192  352,014  491,439  495,558   17,599   13,480

CHANGES FROM 04/22/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -15,647)
   4,971   -3,750  -11,345   -9,944      346  -16,318  -14,749      671     -898

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    16.9      7.5     20.7     59.0     69.2     96.5     97.4      3.5      2.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      139)
      26       37       53       64       67      121      131
```

----

Updated May 2, 2014
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00070-CR

Rory Jones

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 211th District Court

of Denton County (F-2014-0081-C)

November 20, 2014

Opinion by Justice Walker

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By __/s/ Sue Walker___________________

 Justice Sue Walker
----

Exhibit      32

|   | (1) | The                report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                registrant. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                November 4, 2005 |                                                                     |
|---------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                  | /s/                Dennis Highby                                         |
|                                  | Dennis                Highby                                             |
|                                  | President                and Chief Executive Officer                     |
|                                  |                                                                     |
|                                  |                                                                     |
|                                  | /s/                Ralph W. Castner                                      |
|                                  | Ralph                W. Castner                                          |
|                                  | Vice                President and Chief Financial                Officer |

Back      to Form 10-Q
Darlene Kay HERRAN, Petitioner, v. INDIANA.

No. 19-7668.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Indiana denied.
# C_2020011EN.01009201.xml

| 13.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/92 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/92

---

P8_TA(2018)0367

VAT: period of application of the reverse charge mechanism and of the Quick Reaction Mechanism *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 3 October 2018 on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax as regards the period of application of the optional reverse charge mechanism in relation to supplies of certain goods and services susceptible to fraud and of the Quick Reaction Mechanism against VAT fraud (COM(2018)0298 – C8-0265/2018 – 2018/0150(CNS))

(Special legislative procedure – consultation)

(2020/C 011/21)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2018)0298), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2018)0298),

| — | having regard to Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0265/2018), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0265/2018),

| — | having regard to Rule 78c of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 78c of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A8-0283/2018), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A8-0283/2018),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

2.

| 3. | Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

3.

| 4. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments. |
| --- | --- |

4.

---
VIA EDGAR



March 4, 1996


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

RE:	Smith Barney/Travelers Series Fund Inc.
	File Nos. 33-75644
		   811-8372

Dear Sirs:

Pursuant to Rule 497(e) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, please 
find enclosed for filing on behalf of the above-referenced Fund, one (1) copy 
of the Prospectus which does not differ from that contained in the Post-
Effective Amendment No. 4 (the "Amendment") to the Fund's Registration 
Statement on Form N-1A which was filed on February 28, 1996.  

Please return an electronic transmittal as evidence of your receipt of this 
filing.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Daria J. Szczur

Daria J. Szczur

Enclosures

cc:	(with enclosures)
	John E. Baumgardner, Jr., Esq.		Stephen Brunt
	Sullivan & Cromwell			Morgan Guaranty Trust Group

	Robert P. Garrett				Michael McCarthy 
	KPMg Peat Marwick LLP 		The Shareholder Services Group Inc.


g:\funds\$sts\1995\secdocs\lt.ed
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 12 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 12

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
      relating to limitations on the amounts of contributions and 
expenditures that may be made in connection with campaigns for election 
                           to public office.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2013

    Ms. Kaptur introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
      relating to limitations on the amounts of contributions and 
expenditures that may be made in connection with campaigns for election 
                           to public office.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Congress shall have power to set limits on the amount 
of contributions that may be accepted by, and the amount of 
expenditures that may be made by, in support of, or in opposition to, a 
candidate for nomination for election to, or for election to, Federal 
office.
    ``Section 2. A State shall have power to set limits on the amount 
of contributions that may be accepted by, and the amount of 
expenditures that may be made by, in support of, or in opposition to, a 
candidate for nomination for election to, or for election to, State or 
local office.
    ``Section 3. Congress shall have power to implement and enforce 
this article by appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```