alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                          46,854
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    332,515
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               392,489
<PP&E>                                       1,162,503
<DEPRECIATION>                                  46,450
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,834,050
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          938,366
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,593,092
<OTHER-SE>                                 (7,545,832)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,834,050
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    14
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  382,393
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,626
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (415,005)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (415,005)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
Juan JORGE, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA, et al.

No. 19-7546.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 6, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

ACTIVISION PUBLISHING, INC., 

Defendant.

 CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-cv-43

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff Display Technologies, LLC, and Defendant Activision Publishing, Inc. hereby

stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of all claims of infringement that were or could have been 

asserted in this Action, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) 

and 41(a)(1)(B). Each Party will bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees.

Dated: April 15, 2024

/s/ Randall Garteiser

Randall Garteiser 

Texas Bar No. 24038912

rgarteiser@ghiplaw.com

GARTEISER HONEA, PLLC

119 W. Ferguson Street

Tyler, Texas 75702

Telephone: (903) 705-7420

Facsimile: (903) 405-3999

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

/s/ Daniel T. Shvodian

M. Craig Tyler, TX Bar No. 00794762 

CTyler@perkinscoie.com

PERKINS COIE LLP

405 Colorado Street, Suite 1700

Austin, Texas 78701

Tel. No.: (737) 256-6100

Daniel T. Shvodian, CA Bar No. 184576 

DShvodian@perkinscoie.com 

PERKINS COIE LLP

3150 Porter Drive

Palo Alto, California 94304-1212 

Tel No.: (650) 838-4300

Facsimile: (650) 838-4350

Defendant ACTIVISION PUBLISHING, INC.

Attorneys for Defendant

Case 2:24-cv-00043-JRG-RSP Document 11 Filed 04/15/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 189
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

The undersigned attorney represents and confirms that a conference was conducted with 

opposing counsel prior to filing this Joint Stipulation, and counsel is agreed to the relief requested 

herein.

/s/ Randall Garteiser

Randall Garteiser 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing using the Court’s Case Management 

and Electronic Case Filing system, which will send notification of such filing to counsel of record 

in this action registered with the Court’s system. Those counsel not registered with the Court’s 

system will receive service via electronic and U.S. Mail.

/s/ Randall Garteiser

Randall Garteiser 

Case 2:24-cv-00043-JRG-RSP Document 11 Filed 04/15/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 190
EXHIBITS A-C 

REDACTED IN 

ENTIRETY 

Case 2:24-cv-00021-JRG Document 44-4 Filed 06/07/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1545
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 617 

Congratulating the recipient of the 2012 Heisman Memorial Trophy. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 13, 2012 

Mrs. HUTCHISON (for herself and Mr. CORNYN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the recipient of the 2012 Heisman Memorial 

Trophy. 

Whereas, for the 78th time, the Heisman Memorial Trophy 

has been awarded to the most outstanding collegiate football player in the United States; 

Whereas Johnny Manziel overcame intense competition and 

defied expectations during Texas A&M University’s first 

year in the Southeastern Conference; 

Whereas Manziel led the 2012 Texas A&M Aggie football 

team to a regular season record of 10 wins and 2 losses; 

Whereas Manziel was awarded the Davey O’Brien National 

Quarterback Award as the top quarterback in the National Collegiate Athletic Association; 

Whereas Manziel became the first freshman, and only the 

fifth player ever, in National Collegiate Athletic AssociaVerDate Mar 15 2010 08:10 Dec 14, 2012 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR617.IS SR617

erowe on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•SRES 617 IS 

tion Football Bowl Subdivision history to achieve 3,000 

passing yards and 1,000 rushing yards in a season; 

Whereas Manziel became the first player in the Football Bowl 

Subdivision to pass for 300 yards and rush for 100 yards 

in the same game 3 times in his career; 

Whereas Manziel holds the freshman record for quarterback 

rushing yards (1,114) and total yards in a season 

(4,600); 

Whereas Manziel was assisted by the leadership of Southeastern Conference Co-Coach of the Year Kevin Sumlin, 

the exceptional protection of the offensive line anchored 

by Outland Trophy winner Luke Joeckel, and Texas 

A&M’s 12th Man; 

Whereas Manziel became the second Heisman Trophy winner 

at Texas A&M, preceded by John David Crow in 1957; 

Whereas Manziel started the development of his athletic capabilities before attending Texas A&M in the cities of 

Tyler, Texas, and Kerrville, Texas; 

Whereas 2012 marks the eighth time a player at a university 

in Texas has won the Heisman Trophy and back-to-back 

years of keeping the award in Texas; 

Whereas the hullabaloo of Manziel becoming the first freshman to win the Heisman Trophy is another testament to 

the strength and skill of Texas football; and 

Whereas Manziel has combined incredible talent with hard 

work and a good heart: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate congratulates the recipient 

2 of the 2012 Heisman Memorial Trophy. 

Æ 


erowe on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with
Exhibit 10.20

 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO

DONALD E. STOUT’S MEMBERSHIP TO

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

OF AUGME TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

 

The Agreement dated January 4, 2011 between Donald E. Stout and Augme Technologies, Inc. (“Augme” or the “Company”) is hereby amended:

 

The language enclosed below shall be added to Mr. Stout’s Agreement as part of Mr. Stout’s compensation package:

 

·                  you will receive one-percent (1%) Transaction Fee for your participation in the realization of the monetization of the Company’s intellectual property either through: a) a settlement agreement; b) license agreement (except for licenses entered into in the ordinary course of the Company’s business); or c) asset sale during the period of directorship and extending six months thereafter.

 

IN WITTNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Second Amendment to Donald E. Stout’s Membership to the Board of Directors of Augme Technologies, Inc. as of November 28, 2011.

 

 

	
ACCEPTED BY:
    	
ACCEPTED   BY:
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Name: Paul Arena
    	
Name:   Donald E. Stout
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Title: Chairman
    	
Title:   Director
UAET (02-2008)

Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint

Attach this form to the Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint event.

CASE AND DEADLINE INFORMATION

Civil Action No.:

Name of party requesting extension:

Is this the first application for extension of time in this case? Yes

No

If no, please indicate which application this represents: Second

Third

Other ___________

Date of Service of Summons:

Number of days requested: 30 days

15 days

Other _____ days

New Deadline Date: (Required)

ATTORNEY FILING APPLICATION INFORMATION

Full Name:

State Bar No.:

Firm Name:

Address:

Phone:

Fax:

Email:

A certificate of conference does not need to be filed with this unopposed application.

2:23-cv-00591

Sirius XM Radio Inc.

✔

12/27/2023

✔

2/16/2024

Mark A. Baghdassarian

3025558

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

1177 Avenue of the Americas

New York, NY 10036

212-715-9193

212-715-8000

Mbaghdassarian@kramerlevin.com

Case 2:23-cv-00591-JRG-RSP Document 5 Filed 01/11/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 185
COREY BOONE,

Petitioner,

v.

FLORIDA COMMISSION ON 

OFFENDER REVIEW,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D17-1666

Opinion filed December 4, 2017.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.

Corey Boone, pro se, Petitioner.

Rana Wallace, General Counsel, Florida Commission on Offender Review, 

Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and WETHERELL and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
No. 6:23-cv-00320

Paul J. Connall,

Plaintiff,

v.

Warden MTC-ISF et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

Plaintiff Paul J. Connall, a prisoner of the Texas Department of 

Criminal Justice, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 without paying the filing fee. The case was 

transferred to this court for proper venue and referred to United 

States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b).

On July 7, 2023, the magistrate judge issued a report recommending that the court bar the plaintiff from proceeding in forma 

pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and dismiss this case with 

the option to reinstate if the plaintiff pays the filing fee within 15 days

of dismissal. Doc. 7. A copy of the report was mailed to the plaintiff, 

who has not filed written objections or paid the filing fee.

When no party objects to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass 

v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satisfied that it 

contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation. The plaintiff is denied leave to proceed as a pauper, and this 

case is dismissed with prejudice for purposes of proceeding in forma 

pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). This dismissal is without prejudice as to the refiling of the lawsuit upon full payment of the filing 

fee.

Case 6:23-cv-00320-JCB-KNM Document 8 Filed 10/10/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 6
- 2 -

So ordered by the court on October 10, 2023.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cv-00320-JCB-KNM Document 8 Filed 10/10/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 7
Ameen Abdullah MUHAMMAD, Petitioner, v. John KOZELSKI, et al.

No. 19-7444.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Barren Hills and Uncultivated Land Use Right Transfer Agreement



 Exhibit 10.11 
 Barren Hills and Uncultivated Land Use Right Transfer Agreement 
 In order to exploit the
use of Yew and develop the economy of Pingshan town, Pingshan town Government Beichuan Village (Party B) intends to transfer the deserted land of Beichuan Village to Hongdoushan Technology Development Corporation (Party A) for purpose of cultivation
of Yew plants. The two sides have agreed on the following: 
  

	1.	The total layout of barren hills and uncultivated land of Beichuan village’s sideline production-field are 1031mu, except for second group plantations, forest
plantation Maershan, the barren hills and wasteland that have been auctioned, farmers planted to tax farming area, about 400 mu remained, the right to use one—time compensation will be transferred to party A 50—year operation.


  

	2.	The purchase price shall be 2500 yuan per mu and a total of 1,000,000 yuan. 


 

	3.	Party A, after having obtained the legitimate land use right, shall complete the forest cultivation task within three years, during which period it shall have the right
to manage and guard the forest. 

  

	4.	The area of barren hills and wasteland must be tuned into forest, party B is responsible to persuade the farmers to retreat from such wasteland.


  

	5.	In accordance to relevant policy, no compensation shall be provided for the 100 mu returned wasteland. However, in light of the cost to farmers for wasteland,
compensation shall be 30 yuan per mu, and the total number is 3000 yuan. If there is any dispute, it shall be resolved by party B. 

  

	6.	In the transfer of 400 mu barren hills and uncultivated land, some farmers have by themselves cultivated Larch plants. After the harvest of such plants, the use of land
use right shall still be vested to party A. 

  

	7.	During the land use right transfer period, party B shall not interfere with the operation of Party A. 


 

	8.	The total transfer fee for barren hills and uncultivated land and the land clearing compensation shall be 1,003,000.00 yuan, which shall be delivered to Beichuan
village in one installment. 

  

	9.	During the land use right transfer period, party A has the right of ownership, assignment and inheritance. 


 

	10.	This agreement shall take effect after execution by both parties. This agreement creates binding legal effect and shall be honored by both parties.


  

	11.	This agreement shall be executed in three copies of originals 








 Signatures and Seals: 
 Party A: Heilongjiang Yew Technology and Development Co., Ltd. /s/ Zhiguo Wang 
 Party B: Pingshan
Town Government /s/ Jingchang Li 
 Apirl.4.2004
# C_2017255EN.01000601.xml

| 5.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/6

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism apply

(2017/C 255/08)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 (2).

2

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with Section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (3).

3

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 344, 28.12.2001, p. 70.

2

(3)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

3

---
Kenneth Richard DEVORE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7949.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 6, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22A0031. MAURICE YOUNG v. THE STATE.

On July 9, 2019, the trial court issued an order denying Maurice Young’s

request for pre-trial bond. On January 21, 2021, Young filed a pro se notice of appeal

of the trial court’s order.

To obtain review of the order regarding pre-trial bond, Young was required to

comply with the interlocutory appeal procedure set forth in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b),

including obtaining a certificate of immediate review within ten days of the order and

filing an application within ten days of the certificate. See Mullinax v. State, 271 Ga.

112, 112 (1) (515 SE2d 839) (1999); Howard v. State, 194 Ga. App. 857, 857 (392

SE2d 562) (1990). Thus, pretermitting whether Young is represented by counsel

below, which would render his notice of appeal a nullity, see White v. State, 302 Ga.

315, 319 (2) (806 SE2d 489) (2017), we lack jurisdiction because he failed to comply

with the interlocutory appeal procedure. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby

DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

August 16, 2021

08/16/2021
H. Con. Res. 74 Agreed to January 16, 2014

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 3547, the Clerk 

of the House of Representatives shall amend the long title so 

as to read: ‘‘Making consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year 

ending September 30, 2014, and for other purposes.’’. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate.
In Re Harold B. MASON, petitioner.

No. 18-8452.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 23, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
NWL-EX10.2-2012.3.31-Q1


EXHIBIT 10.2


THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE
NEWELL RUBBERMAID INC. 
MANAGEMENT CASH BONUS PLAN 


The Newell Rubbermaid Inc. Management Cash Bonus Plan (the “Plan”), is further amended, effective as of February 8, 2012, with respect to bonuses paid for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2012, as follows:  
1.    Section 6(c) of the Plan is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
(c) Maximum Bonus Payment. The target and maximum annual bonus award payable to a Participant for a Plan Year is a percentage of his Salary, based on the Participant's participation category and the level of achievement of the performance goals, as set forth below:


	
					
	Participation Category
	 
	Bonus as a Percentage of Salary if Targets Achieved at 100% Level
	 
	

Maximum Bonus as a Percentage of Salary

	A/A/A (CEO)
	 
	135%
	 
	270%

	CFO and Group Presidents
	 
	85%
	 
	170%

	A/A
	 
	75%
	 
	150%

	A/B
	 
	65%
	 
	130%

	A/C
	 
	55%
	 
	110%

	A
	 
	45%
	 
	90%

	B/C
	 
	35%
	 
	70%

	B
	 
	33.5%
	 
	67%

	C
	 
	16.75%
	 
	33.5%

	D
	 
	8.375%
	 
	16.75%






Performance below the target levels will result in a lower or no bonus award.


In no event, however, shall any Participant be paid a bonus award for any Plan Year that exceeds $2,900,000.




This Amendment has been executed by the Corporation, by its duly authorized officer, as of this 8th day of February, 2012.
	
		
	 
	NEWELL RUBBERMAID INC.
By:  /s/ James M. Sweet
Title: Executive Vice President - Human Resources and Corporate Communications
Shimon WARONKER, Petitioner, v. HEMPSTEAD UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.

No. 19-893.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 42 AND
43 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          66,622
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   69,767
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               898,655
<PP&E>                                       3,423,130
<DEPRECIATION>                               (278,194)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,179,980
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          127,258
<BONDS>                                      1,710,124
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,179
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,196,138
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,179,980
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               447,373
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  249,651
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              86,441
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                117,341
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            117,341
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   117,341
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.20
        

</TABLE>