alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMMSCOPE HOLDING COMPANY, INC., 

COMMSCOPE INC., ARRIS US HOLDINGS, 

INC., ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC., ARRIS 

TECHNOLOGY, INC., ARRIS ENTERPRISES 

LLC, ARRIS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, 

ARRIS GLOBAL LTD.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00455-JRG-RSP

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND CERTAIN DEADLINES

Pending before the Court is the Parties’ Joint Motion to Extend Certain Deadlines. The 

Court, having considered the unopposed motion, and for good cause shown, finds that the motion 

should be GRANTED.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadlines are extended as shown in the table below. 

All other deadlines shall remain in place absent further leave of Court. 

Event Previous Deadline New Deadline

File Proposed Docket Control

Order and Proposed

Discovery Order

2/1/2024 2/15/2024

File Proposed Protective

Order and Comply with

Paragraphs 1 & 3 of the

Discovery Order

2/8/2024 2/22/2024

Case 2:23-cv-00455-JRG-RSP Document 22-1 Filed 01/31/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 129
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 74 Received in Senate (RDS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 74

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 15, 2014

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
       Providing for a correction in the enrollment of H.R. 3547.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 3547, the Clerk of the House of 
Representatives shall amend the long title so as to read: ``Making 
consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
2014, and for other purposes.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 15, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Eastern District of Texas

1/26/2024

Case 2:24-cv-00048-JRG-RSP Document 5 Filed 01/26/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 51
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) . I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

Other (specify):

. My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 2:24-cv-00048-JRG-RSP Document 5 Filed 01/26/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 52
Lee D. WATTS, Petitioner, v. TENNESSEE.

No. 19-7847.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, Eastern Division denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

BRIAN C. FRANKENFIELD, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23-CV-230

§

B. SMITH, et al., §

§

Defendants. §

MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff, Brian C. Frankenfield, an inmate confined at the Gib Lewis Unit of the Texas

Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this

civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants B. Smith, H. Glover and an

unknown defendant. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United

States Magistrate Judge, for consideration pursuant to the applicable laws and orders of this court. 

On January 5, 2024, the magistrate judge entered a Report and Recommendation in which he

recommended dismissing this case as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (#7). To

date, Plaintiff has not filed objections to the report.1

The court received and considered the Report and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available

evidence. After careful review, the court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of

the United States Magistrate Judge are correct.

1

Plaintiff received a copy of the report on January 23, 2024 (#8).

Case 9:23-cv-00230-MAC-ZJH Document 10 Filed 03/13/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 23
Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate judge (#7)

is ADOPTED. This case is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1).

2

Case 9:23-cv-00230-MAC-ZJH Document 10 Filed 03/13/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 24
Exhibit 10.20


 





 


June 5, 2003


 


Lee McGrath


CFO


Versant Corporation


6539 Dumbarton Circle


Fremont, CA 94555


 


Re: 
Confirmation of renewal of line of credit dated April 18, 2002


 


 


Dear Lee,


 


Per our discussions, this letter will confirm
that Pacific Business Funding ("Bank") a division of Cupertino
National Bank has approved to renew the existing line of credit to Versant
Corporation ("Borrower") to July 18, 2004.


 


Borrower will pay lender a fee of $25,000 for
this renewal.


 


All other terms and conditions granted to
each party in the Loan and Security Agreement ("Agreement") dated and
sign by both parties on April 18, 2002 and extended by both parties via an
amendment on April 11, 2003, excepted as specifically noted above, shall
remain the same.


 


Please call with any questions or sign below
acknowledging the above.


 


Best regards,


 


	
  /s/ Mike Hansen

  	
   

  
	
  Senior Vice President

  	
   

  
	
  Pacific Business Funding

  	
   

  



 


 


Agreed to:


 


	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Lee McGrath

  	
   

  
	
  It's:

  	
  CFO

  	
   

  
	
  Date

  	
  6/4/03
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TEXARKANA DIVISION

§

JUSTIN YEAGER §

§

Plaintiff §

§

v. § Case No. 5:24cv12-JRG-JBB

§

BOWIE COUNTY, TEXAS §

§

Defendant §

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff Justin Yeager, a former inmate of the Bowie County Correctional Center proceeding 

pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaining of alleged deprivations of 

his constitutionalrights. The lawsuit was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge.

On October 1, 2024, the Magistrate Judge issued a Substituted Report and 

Recommendation, recommending that the above lawsuit be dismissed with prejudice as frivolous. 

Docket No. 12. Plaintiff received a copy of this Report on October 7, 2024, but has filed no 

objections to date. Docket No. 14. Accordingly, he is barred from de novo review by the District 

Judge of those findings, conclusions, and recommendations and, except upon grounds of plain error,

from appellate review of the unobjected-to factual findings and legal conclusions accepted and 

adopted by the District Court. Duarte v. City of Lewisville, Texas, 858 F.3d 348, 352 (5th Cir.

2017).

The Court has reviewed the pleadings in this cause and the Report and Recommendation of

the Magistrate Judge. Upon such review, the Court has determined that the Report of the Magistrate

Judge is correct. See United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S.

918 (1989) (where no objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Report are filed, the standard of review is

“clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law”). It is accordingly

Case 5:24-cv-00012-JRG-JBB Document 15 Filed 11/08/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:

48
2

ORDERED that the Substituted Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 

(Docket No. 12) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the District Court. It is further

ORDERED that the above-styled civil action is DISMISSED with prejudice as frivolous. It 

is further

ORDERED that any and all motions which may be pending in this civil action are hereby

DENIED.

.

____________________________________

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 8th day of November, 2024.

Case 5:24-cv-00012-JRG-JBB Document 15 Filed 11/08/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:

49
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 83 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 83

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR EVENT TO CELEBRATE BIRTHDAY OF 
              KING KAMEHAMEHA I.

    (a) Authorization.--Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
is authorized to be used for an 

              

event on June 8, 2014, to celebrate the birthday of King Kamehameha I.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
ceremony described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance 
with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect of the 
Capitol.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 7, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 83

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
      for an event to celebrate the birthday of King Kamehameha I.
```
Case 2:24-cv-00080-JRG Document 52-6 Filed 09/18/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1007
Case 2:24-cv-00080-JRG Document 52-6 Filed 09/18/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 1008
Case 2:24-cv-00080-JRG Document 52-6 Filed 09/18/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 1009
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/02/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       80,533
COMMITMENTS
  26,055    5,195    2,120   46,480   69,842   74,655   77,157    5,878    3,376

CHANGES FROM 06/25/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,239)
   1,705    2,454       11      177      -37    1,893    2,428    1,346      811

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    32.4      6.5      2.6     57.7     86.7     92.7     95.8      7.3      4.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       73)
      10        6        1       36       36       46       43
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/02/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      237,837
COMMITMENTS
  54,684   50,053    1,206  170,640  177,998  226,530  229,257   11,307    8,580

CHANGES FROM 06/25/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     20,608)
 -10,433      417     -413   33,230   20,183   22,384   20,187   -1,776      421

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    23.0     21.0      0.5     71.7     74.8     95.2     96.4      4.8      3.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      153)
      32       25       10       60       62       96       93
```

----

Updated July 8, 2013
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

CHAD WOOD, § 

§ No. 294, 2015

Petitioner Below, §

Appellant, § Court Below—Family Court

§ of the State of Delaware in and

v. § for New Castle County

§

KAREN HALL, § File No. CN11-06437

§ Pet. No. 14-25901

Respondent Below, §

Appellee. §

Submitted: September 9, 2015

Decided: September 11, 2015

O R D E R

This 11th day of September 2015, it appears to the Court that, on August 11, 

2015, the Clerk issued a notice to show cause, by certified mail, directing the 

appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for his failure to 

file an opening brief and appendix. The Clerk sent an additional copy of the notice 

to the appellant on August 26, 2015. The appellant has not responded to the notice 

to show cause within the required ten-day period. Dismissal of the appeal is 

deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 

3(b)(2) and 29(b), that this appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr.

Chief Justice
# C_2018463EN.01009301.xml

| 21.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 463/93 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 463/93

---

P8_TA(2018)0031

Automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Portugal *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 7 February 2018 on the draft Council implementing decision on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Portugal (13308/2017 — C8-0419/2017 — 2017/0821(CNS))

(Consultation)

(2018/C 463/22)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the Council draft (13308/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Council draft (13308/2017),

| — | having regard to Article 39(1) of the Treaty on European Union, as amended by the Treaty of Amsterdam, and Article 9 of Protocol No 36 on transitional provisions, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0419/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 39(1) of the Treaty on European Union, as amended by the Treaty of Amsterdam, and Article 9 of Protocol No 36 on transitional provisions, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0419/2017),

| — | having regard to Council Decision 2008/615/JHA of 23 June 2008 on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime (1), and in particular 33 thereof, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Council Decision 2008/615/JHA of 23 June 2008 on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime (1), and in particular 33 thereof,

| — | having regard to Rule 78c of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 78c of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0017/2018), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0017/2018),

| 1. | Approves the Council draft; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

2.

| 3. | Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

3.

| 4. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

4.

---

(1)  OJ L 210, 6.8.2008, p. 1

---
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Eastern District of Texas

12/20/2023

Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 4 Filed 12/20/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 304
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 4 Filed 12/20/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 305
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-2158

___________

United States of America, *

 *

Appellee, *

 *

Appeal from the United States

v. *

District Court for the

 *

Eastern District of Arkansas.

Vicki Jo Crisco, *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: August 29, 1997

 Filed: September 5,

1997

___________

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

After Vicki Jo Crisco was arrested in Arkansas on

various state drug-trafficking offenses, a federal grand

jury issued an indictment charging her with possessing

with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of

21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (1994). Crisco moved to dismiss

the indictment, arguing that the indictment violated the

Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161-3174 (1994), because

it was filed more than thirty days 
The Honorable Garnett Thomas Eisele, United States District Judge for the

1

Eastern District of Arkansas.

-2-

after she was arrested. After the District Court denied 1

her motion, Crisco moved for reconsideration. The Court

granted her motion for reconsideration and held a hearing

on the motion to dismiss the indictment, which the court

then denied. Crisco subsequently entered into a written

plea agreement with the government, pleading guilty to

the § 841(a)(1) charge without reserving her right to

appeal the denial of her motion to dismiss the

indictment. Crisco appeals, and we affirm.

As Crisco did not condition her guilty plea by

reserving her right to raise her speedy-trial claim on

appeal, we conclude that she waived any such claim. See

United States v. Cox, 985 F.2d 427, 433 (8th Cir. 1993)

(noting that guilty plea waives claim that Speedy Trial

Act was violated); United States v. Gines, 964 F.2d 972,

977 (10th Cir. 1992) (holding that even though party had

moved to dismiss for Speedy Trial Act violation,

subsequent guilty plea waived right to raise speedy-trial

claim on appeal), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1069 (1993).

A true copy.

Attest:

 CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH

CIRCUIT.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1877

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to provide

for duty-free treatment of personal effects of participants in certain

world athletic events.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 19, 1999

Mrs. THURMAN (for herself, Mr. CRANE, Ms. PELOSI, and Mr. LEVIN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways

and Means

A BILL

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United

States to provide for duty-free treatment of personal

effects of participants in certain world athletic events.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF PERSONAL EFFECTS OF PAR4 TICIPANTS IN CERTAIN WORLD ATHLETIC

5 EVENTS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

9 new heading:
2

•HR 1877 IH

‘‘ 9902.98.08 Any of the following articles

not intended for sale or distribution to the public: personal effects of aliens who

are participants in, officials

of, or accredited members of

delegations to, the 1999

International Special Olympics and the 1999 Women’s

World Cup Soccer, and of

persons who are immediate

family members of or servants to any of the foregoing

persons; equipment and materials imported in connection with the foregoing

events by or on behalf of the

foregoing persons or the organizing committees of such

events; articles to be used in

exhibitions depicting the culture of a country participating in any such event;

and, if consistent with the

foregoing, such other articles as the Secretary of

Treasury may allow ............. Free No change Free On or before

12/31/2002 ’’.

1 (b) TAXES AND FEES NOT TO APPLY.—The articles

2 described in heading 9902.98.08 of the Harmonized Tariff

3 Schedule of the United States (as added by subsection (a))

4 shall be free of taxes and fees which may be otherwise

5 applicable.

6 (c) NO EXEMPTION FROM CUSTOMS INSPECTIONS.—

7 The articles described in heading 9902.98.08 of the Har8 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (as added

9 by subsection (a)) shall not be free or otherwise exempt

10 or excluded from routine or other inspections as may be

11 required by the Customs Service.

12 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

13 this section applies to articles entered, or withdrawn from

14 warehouse for consumption, on or after the date of enact15 ment of this Act.

Æ