alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017440EN.01002101.xml

| 21.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 440/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 440/21

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2017/C 440/10)

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Certain prepared or preserved sweetcorn in kernels | Thailand | Anti-dumping duty | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 875/2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain prepared or preserved sweetcorn in kernels originating in Thailand following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (OJ L 244, 13.9.2013, p. 1). | 14.9.2018 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Certain prepared or preserved sweetcorn in kernels

Thailand

Anti-dumping duty

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 875/2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain prepared or preserved sweetcorn in kernels originating in Thailand following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (OJ L 244, 13.9.2013, p. 1).

14.9.2018

---

(1)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

1

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
# C_2018315EN.01000601.xml

| 7.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/6

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on mergers given at its meeting of 23 April 2018 regarding a preliminary draft decision relating to Case M.7993 — Altice/PT Portugal (Article 14(2) procedure)

Rapporteur: France

(2018/C 315/06)

1.

The Advisory Committee (6 Member States) agree with the factors that were considered relevant for the purposes of fixing the amount of the fines for Altice pursuant to Article 14(2)(a) and Article 14(2)(b) of the Merger Regulation (1).

2.

The Advisory Committee (6 Member States) agree with the actual level of the fines proposed by the Commission.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (the EC Merger Regulation) (OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1).

1

---
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 02/11/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      378,851
COMMITMENTS
  85,350  126,458  100,211  171,944  127,437  357,505  354,106   21,346   24,745

CHANGES FROM 02/04/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -5,266)
 -16,152  -26,274   15,902   -1,167    6,550   -1,417   -3,822   -3,849   -1,444

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    22.5     33.4     26.5     45.4     33.6     94.4     93.5      5.6      6.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      169)
      57       56       78       37       41      138      142
```

----

Updated February 14, 2014
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-2647

___________

Charles Armstrong, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

* Appeal from the United States

State of Missouri; Mel Carnahan; * District Court for the Eastern

City of Vinita Park; Virginia Bira; * District of Missouri.

Vinita Park Police Department; 911 *

Emergency System of St. Louis * (UNPUBLISHED)

County; Robert Hartz; Richard Aites; *

St. Louis County; St. Louis County *

Correctional/Justice Department Center *

and Jail Personnel; the 21st Judicial *

Circuit of Missouri, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: December 22, 2000

 Filed: January 5, 2001

___________

Before McMILLIAN, BOWMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit

Judges. 

___________
1The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri.

-2-

PER CURIAM.

Charles Armstrong appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing his pro se civil

rights complaint against multiple defendants. After careful review of the record, we

conclude that Mr. Armstrong’s complaint was frivolous and failed to state a claim. See

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii); Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2), (e)(1); Bray v. Alexandria

Women’s Health Clinic, 506 U.S. 263, 267-68 (1993); West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42,

48 (1988). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Order entered June 10, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 22 - 00421 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF N.A.G.A., A CHILD On Appeal from the 304th Judicial District Court

Dalla s County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. JC - 20 - 00439 - W

O RDER Before the Court is appellants’ June 9, 2022 second motion to extend time to file their jurisdictional letter brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than June 20, 2022.

/s/ DENNISE GARCIA JUSTICE
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/04/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      362,996
COMMITMENTS
 104,145  124,591  103,240  134,638  106,679  342,023  334,510   20,973   28,486

CHANGES FROM 02/25/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -4,046)
  -4,594     -186    4,633   -3,720   -8,181   -3,681   -3,734     -365     -312

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    28.7     34.3     28.4     37.1     29.4     94.2     92.2      5.8      7.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      177)
      56       62       81       41       42      145      150
```

----

Updated March 7, 2014
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 28, 2020

No. 04

- 18

- 00411

- CV

REPSOL OIL AND GAS USA, LLC as successor of Talisman Energy U SA Inc, Statoil Texas

Onshore Properties, LLC, and Statoil Pipelines, LLC, and OGE, LLC

, Appellant s

v.

MATRIX PETROLEUM, LLC , Matrix Petroleum Holdings LLC, JAR Resources Holdings, L.P., and TMRX Petroleum, LLC,

Appellees

From the 218th Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14

- 08

- 00158

- CVL Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellees’ second joint motion for an extension of time to file the appellees’ briefs is granted. We order the appellees’ briefs due May 27, 2020. Counsel is advised that no further extensions of time will be granted absent a timely motion that (1) demonst rates extraordinary circumstances justifying further delay, (2) advises the court of the efforts counsel has expended in preparing the brief, and (3) provides the court reasonable assurance that the brief will be completed and filed by the requested extend ed deadline. The court does not generally consider a heavy work schedule to be an extraordinary circumstance.

________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 28th day of April, 2020

.

________________________ M ichael A. C ruz
, Clerk of Court
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON 

WIRELESS, 

Defendant.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP 

LEAD CASE

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

AT&T SERVICES INC.; AT&T MOBILITY LLC; 

AT&T CORP.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00380-JRG-RSP

MEMBER CASE

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

T-MOBILE USA, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:22-cv-00381-JRG-RSP

MEMBER CASE

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

PROPOSED DOCKET CONTROL ORDER AND DISCOVERY ORDER

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Cobblestone Wireless, LLC (“Cobblestone”) and 

Defendants T-Mobile USA, Inc., AT&T Services Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Corp., and 

Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless’s (collectively, “Defendants”) (collectively, the 

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 50-1 Filed 12/18/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 243
2

“Parties”) Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Proposed Docket Control Order and 

Discovery Order. The Court, having considered the joint motion, and for good cause shown, finds 

that the motion should be GRANTED.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for filing the proposed docket control order 

and discovery order is extended from December 18, 2023 to December 22, 2023. All other 

deadlines shall remain in place absent further leave of Court.

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 50-1 Filed 12/18/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 244
Chairman of the Board Compensation Letter



 Exhibit 10.6 

 

					
	 




	 		  	 13024 Ballantyne Corporate Place

	 		  	 Harris Building Suite 900

	 		  	 Charlotte, NC 28277

	 		  	 (704) 554-1421


 February 9, 2012 
 Mr. Michael A. Warehime 
 1250 York Street 

Hanover, PA 17331 
 Re: Equity Compensation 
 Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of July 21,
2010, as amended, among Lance, Inc., Lima Merger Corp. and Snyder’s of Hanover, Inc., your compensation for serving as Chairman of the Board has been set for 2012. 
 The above Agreement provides for “an annual incentive target at 150% of annual remuneration as determined consistent with the annual incentive for the Chief Executive Officer and the President.”

 The purpose of this letter is to confirm the amendments to your annual incentive for 2012 that have been agreed upon. Your Incentive Target
will be 100% of annual remuneration under the Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. Annual Performance Incentive Plan for Officers for 2012. 
 In addition,
you will receive $165,000 of restricted stock and $165,000 of nonqualified stock options to be granted at the same time and on the same terms and conditions as grants of restricted stock and nonqualified stock options under the Snyder’s-Lance,
Inc. Long Term Performance Incentive Plan for Officers and Key Managers for 2012, except that such shares of restricted stock and such nonqualified stock options will vest one year after the date of grant but only to the extent of the attainment of
the Performance Goals under the Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. Annual Performance Incentive Plan for Officers for 2012. Any shares of restricted stock or nonqualified stock options that do not so vest shall be forfeited. Vested shares and options will be
rounded to the closest full number of shares or options. In the event that the Performance Goals attainment with respect to the amounts designated for restricted stock and nonqualified stock options is more than 100%, such amount will be paid in
cash. 
  

	
	 Very truly yours,

	
	 David V. Singer

	 Chief Executive Officer
# r1C,1"114
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF F IViaTtilA PR 06-0422
IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF JOSE B.LORENZO 

### SEP 0 1 

# 20n
Bowen Greenwood Uerk of Supreme Court Stain c

itly` E' R '
Jose B. Lorenzo has petitioned the Court to waive the three-year test requirement for the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination (MPRE)for purposes of his application for admission by motion to the State Bar ofMontana. By rule, applicants for adrnission by motion must provide evidence of the requisite score on an MPRE taken "within three years preceding the date of the application for admission." Rule IV.A.3, Rules ofAdmission. Lorenzo passed the MPRE in 1998 when seeking adrnission to the practice oflaw in Florida. He was admitted to the Florida Bar in 1998 and the District of Columbia Bar in 1999,and has rernained a member ofgood standing in both ofthose bars since then. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition ofJose B.Lorenzo to waive the threeyear test requirernent for the MPRE for purposes ofhis current application for admission by motion to the State Bar ofMontana is GRANTED. The Clerk shall mail a copy ofthis order to Petitioner and to the Adrninistrator of the Board ofBar Examiners at the State Bar ofMontana. DATED this / day ofSepternber, 2020.

ChiefJustice 09/01/2020

Case Number: PR 06-0422
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-23-00597-CV

Jason STAPLETON,

Appellant

v.

NAADE HOMES, LLC,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2023CV01712

Honorable Cesar Garcia, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 27, 2023

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

Appellant’s brief was originally due August 7, 2023 and was not filed. On August 21, 2023, 

we ordered appellant to file, by September 5, 2023: (1) his brief; and (2) a written response 

reasonably explaining his failure to timely file a brief. In our order, we cautioned the appellant that 

if he failed to timely file a brief and written response, we would dismiss the appeal for want of 

prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a). 

Appellant did not respond to our order. Because appellant has failed to timely file a brief, 

this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See id.

PER CURIAM
# C_2017384EN.01000702.xml

| 14.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 384/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 384/7

---

EUROPEAN INSTITUTE OF INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2016

(2017/C 384/25)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://eit.europa.eu/interact/bookshelf/governing-board-decision-opinion-governing-board-final-accounts-2016

---
Exhibit 10.15


 


AMENDATORY AGREEMENT


 


This
Amendatory Agreement (the “Agreement”) is entered into as of January 1,
2002 between BRW Acquisition, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”)
and Fisher Capital Corp. LLC (“Fisher Capital”).


 


WHEREAS, the
Company and Fisher Capital entered into a letter agreement dated as of July 9,
1998 (the “Letter Agreement”) whereunder Fisher Capital agreed to
provide management, consulting and financial services to the Company and the
Company agreed to retain Fisher Capital to provide such services pursuant to
the terms contained therein (including the payment by the Company to Fisher
Capital of a fee (the “Fee”) equal to $250,000 per calendar year to
Fisher Capital in consideration of its provision of such services);


 


WHEREAS,
effective as of September 1, 2000, Jim Fisher, Managing Member of Fisher
Capital, commenced performing services for the Company in the capacity of
Acting Chief Executive Officer thereof and in consideration therefor, the
Company agreed to increase the fee to $600,000 per calendar year, retroactive
to January 1, 2000.


 


WHEREAS,
effective as of January 1, 2002, in consideration of Jim Fisher, Managing
Member of Fisher Capital, performing services for the Company in the capacity
of Acting Chief Executive Officer thereof, the Company agrees to increase the
fee to $700,000 per calendar year, effective to January 1, 2002.


 


NOW THEREFORE,
to implement the foregoing and for good and valuable consideration, the parties
to this Agreement agree as follows:


 


1.               Paragraph
1 of the Letter Agreement is amended by replacing the phrase “six hundred
thousand dollars ($600,000)” with the phrase “seven hundred thousand dollars
($700,000)”, commencing as of January 1, 2002.


 


2.               As
amended by this Agreement, the Letter Agreement shall continue in full force
and effect in accordance with the terms thereof.


 


 


	
  FISHER
  CAPITAL CORP. LLC

  	
  BRW
  ACQUISITION, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ James R.
  Fisher

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Donald
  M. Simon 

  	
   

  
	
  Name:

  	
  James R.
  Fisher

  	
  Name:

  	
  Donald M.
  Simon

  
	
  Title:

  	
  Managing
  Member

  	
  Title:

  	
  President
NOTICE OF FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES PAGE 1 OF 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TYLER DIVISION

LADARION HUGHES, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

vs.

SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 6:23-cv-344-JDK

 

PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF FIRST AMENDED 26(a)(1) DISCLOSURES

TO THE HONORABLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:

COMES NOW Plaintiffs, by their undersigned counsel, and files its Notice of First 

Amended 26(a)(1) Disclosures, and would respectfully show unto the Court as follows:

On May 10, 2024, Plaintiffs provided all counsel of record with their First Amended 

26(a)(1) Disclosures in compliance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this Court’s 

Order.

 

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Meg Gould

Counsel for Plaintiffs

Case 6:23-cv-00344-JDK Document 23 Filed 05/14/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 227
NOTICE OF FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES PAGE 2 OF 2

Steve Weil 

Meg Gould

LOEVY & LOEVY

311 N. Aberdeen

Chicago, Illinois 60607

(312) 243-5900

gould@loevy.com

Texas Fair Defense Project

Nathan Fennell

Camilla Hsu

314 E. Highland Mall Blvd #204

Austin, TX 78752

nfennell@fairdefense.org

chsu@fairdefense.org

512-637-5220

Akeeb Dami Animashaun

355 S. Grand Ave, Suite 2450

Los Angeles, CA 90071

animashaun@pm.me

929-266-3971

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Meg Gould, an attorney, hereby certify that on May 14, 2024, I caused the foregoing 

Notice to be filed using the Court’s CM/ECF system, which effected service on all counsel of 

record. 

/s/ Meg Gould

One of Plaintiffs’ Attorneys

Case 6:23-cv-00344-JDK Document 23 Filed 05/14/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 228
Demetrius Antwon WILSON, Petitioner, v. David SHINN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 19-7769.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# C_2017029EN.01000801.xml

| 28.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 29/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 29/8

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/172/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt

(2017/C 29/06)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/172/CFSP (1), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 (2), concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt.

1

2

The Council holds on its file new elements concerning all persons listed in the Annex to Decision 2011/172/CFSP and in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 270/2011. The persons concerned are hereby informed that they may submit a request to the Council to obtain the information that relates to them, before 17 February 2017, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council’s periodic review, in accordance with Article 5 of Decision 2011/172/CFSP and Article 12 of Regulation (EU) No 270/2011.

---

(1)  OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 63.

1

(2)  OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 4.

2

---