alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000918997
<NAME> VECTOR ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             865
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      476
<ALLOWANCES>                                        39
<INVENTORY>                                       1444 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  3213
<PP&E>                                             737
<DEPRECIATION>                                     176 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    3466
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              700
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            63
<OTHER-SE>                                        2703
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      3466
<SALES>                                           1301 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1301 
<CGS>                                             1024 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1390 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  3523
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4325)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4325)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4325)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.24)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2018327EN.01000201.xml

| 17.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 327/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 327/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8435 — FMC/DuPont Divestment Business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 327/03)

On 27 July 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8435. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8435. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Cynthia E. COLLIE, Petitioner, v. SOUTH CAROLINA COMMISSION ON LAWYER CONDUCT.

No. 18-8128.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Carolina denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of Brightpoint, Inc.'s (the "Company") Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 (the "Report"), I,
Robert J. Laikin, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                  /s/ Robert J. Laikin
                                  -----------------------------------------
                                  Robert J. Laikin Chairman of the Board
                                  and Chief Executive Officer

Date: February 22, 2007
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TYLER DIVISION

THE DAILY WIRE, LLC, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 

STATE, et al.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Case No. 6:23-cv-609-JDK

ORDER REGARDING APRIL 19 ORAL ARGUMENT

Plaintiffs ask the Court to clarify whether the April 19 oral argument will 

address the pending motion for a preliminary injunction and motion to dismiss. 

Docket No. 34. Plaintiffs explain that they seek discovery that might bear on those 

motions and ask the Court to limit the April 19 hearing to the motion for expedited 

discovery and to Defendants’ motion to transfer venue. Alternatively, Plaintiffs seek 

a continuance of the hearing on their preliminary injunction motion and Defendants’ 

motion to dismiss. The Court GRANTS IN PART Plaintiffs’ motion (Docket No. 34), 

as explained below.

To clarify, the Court does not intend to determine the motion for a preliminary 

injunction at the April 19 hearing and would set a separate hearing for that motion 

at a later date if necessary. But the Court does seek to understand how the four 

pending motions relate to one another, the proper order of resolution, and the effect 

of Plaintiffs’ requested discovery on the pending motions. Accordingly, the parties 

should be prepared to discuss the merits of all four pending motions on April 19. 

Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 36 Filed 04/01/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1072
2

So ORDERED and SIGNED this day of

___________________________________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1st April, 2024.

Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 36 Filed 04/01/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1073
# C_2018037EN.01002801.xml

| 1.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/28

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.8753 — HASCO/Magna/JV)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 37/09)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Huayu Automotive Systems Co., Ltd (‘HASCO’, China) controlled by Shanghai Automotive Industry Corporation Group (‘SAIC’, China), |
| --- | --- |

—

Huayu Automotive Systems Co., Ltd (‘HASCO’, China) controlled by Shanghai Automotive Industry Corporation Group (‘SAIC’, China),

| — | Magna International Inc. (‘Magna’, Canada), |
| --- | --- |

—

Magna International Inc. (‘Magna’, Canada),

| — | HASCO Magna Electric Drive System Co., Ltd, (‘E-Drive Ltd’, China). |
| --- | --- |

—

HASCO Magna Electric Drive System Co., Ltd, (‘E-Drive Ltd’, China).

HASCO and Magna acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of E-Drive Ltd.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.

2.

| — | HASCO is active in the production and sale of automotive components for a variety of car manufacturers, |
| --- | --- |

—

HASCO is active in the production and sale of automotive components for a variety of car manufacturers,

| — | Magna is active globally in the manufacture and supply of automotive components, including e-drive power train systems, |
| --- | --- |

—

Magna is active globally in the manufacture and supply of automotive components, including e-drive power train systems,

| — | E-Drive Ltd aims to assemble e-motors, gearboxes, inverters and other related parts into an e-drive powertrain system and sell it to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs). |
| --- | --- |

—

E-Drive Ltd aims to assemble e-motors, gearboxes, inverters and other related parts into an e-drive powertrain system and sell it to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs).

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.8753 — HASCO/Magna/JV

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| Email: |
| --- |
| COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax |
| +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Email:

COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax

+32 22964301

Postal address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  
  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  
  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of SeaBright Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Scott H. Maw, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  May 6, 2011
   /s/ Scott H. Maw

Scott H. Maw

Senior Vice President – Chief Financial Officer

and Assistant Secretary




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to SeaBright Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by SeaBright Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.43    
    


December 10,
2003 


Mr. Abraham
N. Reichental

3D Systems Corporation

26081 Avenue Hall

Valencia, CA 91355 


Dear
Abe: 


        The
purpose of this letter is to clarify the provisions of your employment agreement dated September 19, 2003 relating to the number of shares of the common stock of 3D Systems
Corporation to be awarded to you as incentive stock options and the vesting schedule of those options in order to comply with applicable regulatory limitations. When executed by you and the Chairman
of the Board of 3D Systems in the spaces provided below, this letter will constitute an amendment to your employment agreement, and all other provisions of your employment agreement will remain in
full force and effect. 


        Based
on a review of the applicable legal requirements relating to the 400,000 shares of 3D Systems' common stock to be awarded to you under option agreements, 55,401 shares will be
covered by incentive stock options, and the remaining 344,599 shares will be covered by non-qualified stock options. 


        The
vesting of your incentive stock options shall be as follows: The shares shall vest over a period of four years, with 3,462 shares vesting on December 31, 2003, 10,388 shares
vesting on September 19, 2004, the first anniversary of the date of grant, and the remaining shares vesting in approximately equal monthly installments beginning on October 19, 2004 (35
installments of 1,154 shares and a 36th installment of 1,161 shares). 


        If
you are in agreement with the foregoing, please sign and return a copy of this letter to Bob Grace. 


Sincerely,




	

3D SYSTEMS CORPORATION	
 	

 	
 	

 
	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 
	By:	 	/s/  G. WALTER LOEWENBAUM, II       
 G. Walter Loewenbaum, II

Chairman of the Board of Directors	 	 	 	 
	

Accepted and agreed:	
 	

 	
 	

 
	

 	
 	

/s/  ABRAHAM N. REICHENTAL       
 Abraham N. Reichental	
 	

Date:	
 	

December 17, 2003 












QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.43
IA 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 25 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to clarify 

the authority of Congress and the States to regulate the expenditure 

of funds for political activity by corporations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2013 

Ms. EDWARDS (for herself, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. CAPUANO, 

Mr. CICILLINE, Ms. ESTY, Mr. GRAYSON, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. HIMES, 

Mr. HUFFMAN, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. JOHNSON

of Georgia, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. MCGOVERN, 

Mr. MEEKS, Ms. NORTON, Ms. PINGREE of Maine, Mr. RUSH, Mr. SARBANES, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. COHEN, 

Mr. MARKEY, Ms. SHEA-PORTER, Ms. HAHN, Ms. BASS, Mr. WELCH, 

and Mrs. DAVIS of California) introduced the following joint resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to clarify the authority of Congress and the States 

to regulate the expenditure of funds for political activity 

by corporations. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 25 IH 

1 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

2 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

3 States: 

4 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

5 ‘‘SECTION 1. Nothing in this Constitution shall pro6 hibit Congress and the States from imposing content-neu7 tral regulations and restrictions on the expenditure of 

8 funds for political activity by any corporation, limited li9 ability company, or other corporate entity, including but 

10 not limited to contributions in support of, or in opposition 

11 to, a candidate for public office. 

12 ‘‘SECTION 2. Nothing contained in this Article shall 

13 be construed to abridge the freedom of the press.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Roderick Delon LEWIS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8401.

Supreme Court of the United States.

June 1, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 23.01


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report dated January 23, 1998 included in this Form 10-K into
Crescent Real Estate Equities Company's previously filed Registration
Statements File No. 33-91438, No. 33-92548, No. 333-03450, No. 333-03452, No.
333-08454, No. 333-13521, No. 333-21905, No. 333-23005, No. 333-33893, No.
333-37273, No. 333-38071, No. 333-37565, No. 333-41049, No. 333-37553, No.
333-47563, and No. 333-42417.


                                   ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Dallas, Texas
 March 31, 1998
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 6 

Expressing the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court misinterpreted 

the First Amendment to the Constitution in the case of Buckley v. Valeo. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2013 

Ms. KAPTUR submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court 

misinterpreted the First Amendment to the Constitution 

in the case of Buckley v. Valeo. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that the Su3 preme Court misinterpreted the First Amendment to the 

4 Constitution in its decision in the 1976 case of Buckley 

5 v. Valeo because— 

6 (1) the decision failed to recognize that the un7 limited spending of large amounts of money on elec8 tions has a corrosive effect on the electoral process 

9 not simply because of direct transactions between 

10 those who give large amounts of money and canVerDate Mar 15 2010 00:01 Jan 05, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HC6.IH HC6

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HCON 6 IH 

1 didates and elected officials but because the presence 

2 of unlimited amounts of money corrupts the process 

3 on a more fundamental level; and 

4 (2) the decision failed to recognize other legiti5 mate state interests which justify limiting money in 

6 campaigns, including the need to preserve the integ7 rity of our republican form of government, restore 

8 public confidence in government, and ensure all citi9 zens a more equal opportunity to participate in the 

10 political process. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with
IA 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 111 

Providing for the reappointment of John W. McCarter as a citizen regent 

of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 4, 2014 

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas (for himself, Mr. COLE, and Mr. BECERRA) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on House Administration 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the reappointment of John W. McCarter as 

a citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on 

5 the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in 

6 the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 

7 reason of the expiration of the term of John W. McCarter 

8 of Illinois on March 14, 2014, is filled by the reappoint9 ment of the incumbent. The appointment is for a term 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 111 IH 

1 of 6 years, beginning on the later of March 15, 2014, or 

2 the date of the enactment of this joint resolution. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

JOHN BOSWELL, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:24-CV-33

§

WAINWRIGHT UNIT, et al., §

§

Defendants. §

MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING 

THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

John Boswell, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit. The court previously

referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States Magistrate Judge, at

Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The

magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge

recommending that the case dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 41(b). To date, the parties have not filed objections.

The court has received the Report and Recommendation, along with the record, pleadings,

and all available evidence. After careful review, the court finds that the findings of fact and

conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (#12) is

ADOPTED. A final judgment shall be entered dismissing this lawsuit.

Signed this date

Jun 7, 2024

Case 9:24-cv-00033-MAC-CLS Document 13 Filed 06/07/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 27
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                 5
<CIK>                                     0000911503
<NAME>                                    SB Diversified Futures fund L.P.

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          98,293,252
<SECURITIES>                                       622,080
<RECEIVABLES>                                      330,280
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                99,245,612
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  99,245,612
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,308,175
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                      95,937,437
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    99,245,612
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                (3,027,263)
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,817,499
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,844,762)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,844,762)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (60.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0


</TABLE>