alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

CHRISTOPHER SCOT TAYLOR, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23-CV-210

§

JAMES PAYNE, DISTRICT JUDGE, et al., §

§

Defendants. §

MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff, Christopher Scot Taylor, an inmate confined at the Shelby County Jail in Center,

Texas, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against

Defendants District Judge James Payne, Shelby County District Attorney Karren Price, District

Judge LeAnn Rafferty, Shelby County Judge Allison Harbuson, Attorney John Price, Kevin

Windham, Chief Deputy Sheriff Ruth Gonzales, Attorney Holly Hammons, and Attorney Dexter

Jones. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine Stetson, United States Magistrate

Judge, for consideration pursuant to the applicable laws and orders of this court. On January 3,

2024, the magistrate judge entered a Report and Recommendation in which she recommended

dismissing this case for want of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b)

(#11). To date, Plaintiff has not filed objections to the report.

The court received and considered the Report and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available

evidence. After careful review, the court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of

the United States Magistrate Judge are correct.

Case 9:23-cv-00210-MAC-CLS Document 12 Filed 03/14/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 63
Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate judge (#11)

is ADOPTED. This case is dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution pursuant to

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

2

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 14th day of March, 2024.

Case 9:23-cv-00210-MAC-CLS Document 12 Filed 03/14/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 64
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         104,353
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,236
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,322
<INVENTORY>                                     45,109
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               179,695
<PP&E>                                         379,182
<DEPRECIATION>                                 139,696
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 473,667
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          120,130
<BONDS>                                        995,442
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           19,500
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           646
<OTHER-SE>                                   (862,933)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   473,667
<SALES>                                        675,671
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               675,671
<CGS>                                          359,071
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  286,405
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,475
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              97,896
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (70,176)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (277)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (69,899)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (69,899)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.11)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2018029EN.01000101.xml

| 26.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 29/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 29/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8737 — AmTrust/Madison Dearborn Partners/Mayfield Holdings JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 29/01)

On 19 January 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8737. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8737. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
IN RE Frank DEVILLE, Petitioner.

No. 19-7756.

Supreme Court of the United States.

June 1, 2020

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUFKIN DIVISION

JOSHUA TOLBERT,

Plaintiff,

v. 

KONCEPT MOTOR CARS, STRAWBERRY 

ROAD AUTO SALES,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23-CV-00214-MJT-ZJH

JUDGE MICHAEL TRUNCALE

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On November 20, 2023, the Court referred this case to United States Magistrate Judge Zack 

Hawthorn for pretrial management. [Dkt. 1]. On January 30, 2024, Judge Hawthorn issued a 

Report and Recommendation finding that Tolbert met the indigence requirements to proceed in 

forma pauperis. [Dkt. 4]. However, Judge Hawthorn also sua sponte recommended dismissing

Tolbert’s complaint because he failed to establish this Court has subject-matter jurisdiction to 

entertain the case. Id. The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, 

and the time for doing so has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

The Court received and considered the Report and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings, and all available 

evidence. Proper notice was given to Plaintiff at his last known address. See FED. R. CIV. P.

5(b)(2)(C). After careful review, the Court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law 

of the United States Magistrate Judge are correct.

Case 9:23-cv-00214-MJT-ZJH Document 6 Filed 05/02/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 21
2

It is therefore ORDERED that Judge Hawthorn’s Report and Recommendation dismissing 

Plaintiff Joshua Tolbert’s complaint [Dkt. 4] is ADOPTED. Tolbert’s complaint [Dkt. 1] is 

therefore DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court will issue a Final Judgment 

separately. 

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 2nd day of May, 2024.

Case 9:23-cv-00214-MJT-ZJH Document 6 Filed 05/02/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 22
III 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 44 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 23, 2013 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District 

of Columbia Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF THE CAPITOL 

4 GROUNDS FOR DC SPECIAL OLYMPICS LAW 

5 ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN. 

6 On September 27, 2013, or on such other date as 

7 the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HCON 44 RDS 

1 Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate 

2 may jointly designate, the 28th Annual District of Colum3 bia Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this 

4 resolution referred to as the ‘‘event’’) may be run through 

5 the Capitol Grounds to carry the Special Olympics torch 

6 to honor local Special Olympics athletes. 

7 SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD. 

8 The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as 

9 may be necessary to carry out the event. 

10 SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARA11 TIONS. 

12 The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions 

13 for physical preparations for the event. 

14 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

15 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce16 ment of the restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of 

17 title 40, United States Code, concerning sales, advertise18 ments, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, 

19 as well as other restrictions applicable to the Capitol 

20 Grounds, in connection with the event. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 22, 2013. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

CROGA INNOVATIONS LTD., 

Plaintiff,

v. 

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-cv-00065-JRG

(LEAD CASE)

CROGA INNOVATIONS LTD., 

Plaintiff,

v. 

FORTINET, INC.,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-cv-00206-JRG

(MEMBER CASE)

CROGA INNOVATIONS LTD., 

Plaintiff,

v. 

PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC.,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-CV-00208-JRG

(MEMBER CASE)

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff Croga Innovations Ltd.’s (“Plaintiff”) Unopposed Motion for 

Leave to Amend its Infringement Contentions (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 54.) In the Motion, 

Plaintiff moves to serve amended infringement contentions that add supplementation requested by 

Defendant Fortinet, Inc. (“Defendant”). (Id.) Plaintiff contends that good cause exists to amend its 

contentions. (Id.) Defendant does not oppose the Motion. (Id.) 

Case 2:24-cv-00065-JRG Document 55 Filed 07/25/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 376
2

Having considered the Motion, noting that it is unopposed and shows good cause, the Court 

finds that the Motion should be and hereby is GRANTED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that 

Plaintiff has leave to amend its infringement contentions. 

____________________________________

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 25th day of July, 2024.

Case 2:24-cv-00065-JRG Document 55 Filed 07/25/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 377
Exhibit Z

Redacted in Entirety

Case 2:24-cv-00021-JRG Document 54-27 Filed 07/18/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 3513
### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION II

In the Matter of No. 51810

- 4

- II the Personal Restraint of

BRANDON C. PRIES,

Petitioner. UNPUBLISHED OPINION

L EE , A.C. J.

— Brandon C. Pries seeks relief from personal restraint resulting from his

2011 plea of guilty to failure to register as a sex offender

- second offense under former RCW

9A.44.132(1)(b) (2010). He argues that because his prior convictions for failure to register as a

sex offender were under former RCW 9A.44.130 (2010), not under former RCW 9A.44.132, the

trial court erred in sentencing him to a c lass B felony under former RCW 9A.44.132(1)(b) and

instead should have sentenced him to a class C felony under former RCW 9A.44.132(1)(a)(ii). 1

State v. Wilcox , 196 Wn. App. 206, 210

- 11, 383 P.3d 549 (2016). The State concedes that Pries

is correct and t hat he is entitled to be resentenced. We accept the State’s concession.

Because Pries’s prior convictions for failure to register as a sex offender were under former

RCW 9A.44.130 and not under former RCW 9A.44.132, Pries’s prior convictions do not fall under

the definition of a sex offense. Wilcox , 196 Wn. App. at 210

- 13. Thus, the trial court improperly

1 Because the State concedes that Pries’s judgment and sentence is facially invalid, it is not subject to RCW 10.73.090’s time bar. Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two

February 13, 2019No. 51810

- 4

- II

2

sentenced Pries to a class B felony and improperly imposed a registration requirement. Therefore,

we grant Pries’s petition, reverse his sentence, an d remand for resentencing. We deny his request

for appointment of counsel.

A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the

Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW 2.0 6.040,

it is so ordered.

LEE, A.C.J. We concur:

WORSWICK, J.

SUTTON, J.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 101 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 101

   Expressing the sense of Congress that Warren Weinstein should be 
                      returned home to his family.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 11, 2014

 Mr. Delaney submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of Congress that Warren Weinstein should be 
                      returned home to his family.

Whereas Warren Weinstein was abducted in Pakistan in 2011 and is currently being 
        held captive by al-Qaeda;
Whereas Warren Weinstein is a former Peace Corps and former United States Agency 
        for International Development official;
Whereas Warren Weinstein is widely recognized as a scholar and humanitarian who 
        has spent his career working to improve the lives of men, women, and 
        children around the world; and
Whereas video released of Warren Weinstein by his captors confirms that he is in 
        poor health: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that the Administration should--
            (1) use all of the lawful tools at its disposal to bring 
        Warren Weinstein home to his family;
            (2) make the return of all United States citizens held 
        captive abroad, regardless of their different circumstances, a 
        top priority; and
            (3) keep Congress apprised of its actions to achieve these 
        goals as new information is available, or quarterly if no new 
        information is available.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of G & L Realty Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel M. Gottlieb, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
David DERRINGER, Petitioner v. Isidro SAENZ

No. 18-7785

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             259
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,446
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,095
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,103
<PP&E>                                         211,977
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,101
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 224,339
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,374
<BONDS>                                        174,737
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         29
<COMMON>                                            23
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,426
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   224,339
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,368
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,141
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,174
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,491
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    562
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                412
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       412
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.59)


</TABLE>
Qais HUSSEIN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8325.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of G & L Realty Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel M. Gottlieb, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
IA 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 103 

Providing for the appointment of John Fahey as a citizen regent of the 

Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 13, 2013 

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas (for himself, Mr. BECERRA, and Mr. COLE) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on House Administration 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the appointment of John Fahey as a citizen 

regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents 

5 of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other than 

6 Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the expira7 tion of the term of Roger W. Sant of the District of Co8 lumbia on October 24, 2013, is filled by the appointment 

9 of John Fahey of the District of Columbia. The appointVerDate Mar 15 2010 23:27 Nov 13, 2013 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HJ103.IH HJ103

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 103 IH 

1 ment is for a term of 6 years, beginning on the date of 

2 the enactment of this joint resolution. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2017159EN.01000101.xml

| 19.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 159/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 159/1

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 159/01)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 01.09.2015 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.38406 (2014/N) |
| Member State | Croatia |
| Region | HRVATSKA | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Program državnih potpora za proizvodnju električne energije iz obnovljivih izvora energije |
| Legal basis | Strategija energetskog razvitka Republike Hrvatske;
  Zakon o energiji;
  Zakon o tržištu električne energije;
  Pravilnik o stjecanju statusa povlaštenog proizvođača električne energije;
  Tarifni sustav za proizvodnju električne energije iz obnovljivih izvora energije i kogeneracije;
  Metodologija za određivanje iznosa tarifnih stavki za opskrbu električnom energijom u okviru univerzalne usluge |
| Type of measure | Scheme | — |
| Objective | Environmental protection, Sectoral development |
| Form of aid | Other — feed-in tariff. |
| Budget | Overall budget: HRK 2 314 (in millions)
  Annual budget: HRK 1 157 (in millions) |
| Intensity | 100 % |
| Duration (period) | 01.01.2014 — 31.12.2015 |
| Economic sectors | Production of electricity |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Ministarstvo gospodarstva |
| Ulica grada Vukovara 78, 10000 Zagreb, Republika Hrvatska |
| Hrvatski operator tržišta energije d.o.o. |
| Miramarska 23, 10000 Zagreb, Republika Hrvatska |

Date of adoption of the decision

01.09.2015

Aid number

SA.38406 (2014/N)

Member State

Croatia

Region

HRVATSKA

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Program državnih potpora za proizvodnju električne energije iz obnovljivih izvora energije

Legal basis

Strategija energetskog razvitka Republike Hrvatske;

Zakon o energiji;

Zakon o tržištu električne energije;

Pravilnik o stjecanju statusa povlaštenog proizvođača električne energije;

Tarifni sustav za proizvodnju električne energije iz obnovljivih izvora energije i kogeneracije;

Metodologija za određivanje iznosa tarifnih stavki za opskrbu električnom energijom u okviru univerzalne usluge

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Environmental protection, Sectoral development

Form of aid

Other — feed-in tariff.

Budget

Overall budget: HRK 2 314 (in millions)

Annual budget: HRK 1 157 (in millions)

Intensity

100 %

Duration (period)

01.01.2014 — 31.12.2015

Economic sectors

Production of electricity

Name and address of the granting authority

Ministarstvo gospodarstva

Ulica grada Vukovara 78, 10000 Zagreb, Republika Hrvatska

Hrvatski operator tržišta energije d.o.o.

Miramarska 23, 10000 Zagreb, Republika Hrvatska

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm.

---