alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       9,664,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,650,000<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    640,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,538,000
<PP&E>                                      10,407,000<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,517,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,392,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,776,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,517,000
<SALES>                                     10,702,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,702,000
<CGS>                                        8,089,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,368,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               648,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               192,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (23,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                505,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    50,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            455,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   455,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
<FN>
<F1>THE VALUES FOR THE TAGS OF (RECEIVABLES) AND (PP&E) REPRESENT NET AMOUNTS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Charles MASSENGILL, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5751

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Paul Edward DURAN, Petitioner, v. Ralph DIAZ, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

No. 19-7489.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for rehearing denied.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 22, 2016

No. 04-15-00688-CV

IN THE ESTATE OF CARLOS AGUILAR, DECEASED,

From the County Court at Law No 2, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-PB4-000048 L2

Honorable Jesus Garza, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellees' unopposed motion for extension of time to file brief is hereby GRANTED. 

Time is extended to July 20, 2016.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of June, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### MINNEAPOLIS, ST. PAUL, ROCHESTER *&*DUBUQUE ELECTRIC TRACTION COMPANY v. BETSEY E. FORSTROM and Others.1

July 23, *1909.*

*Nos.*16,141—(143).

Proceeding in the district court for Dakota county to condemn a right of way over certain land in that county for an electric traction railway under the power of eminent domain. Commissioners were appointed as provided by statute and awarded $1,000 to the owners of the lanjl as damages. From this award the traction company appealed to the district court. The case was tried before Ci’osby, J., and a jury which rendered a verdict assessing respondents’ damages at $1,200. From an order denying the company’s motion for a new trial, it appealed to this court.

.Reversed and new trial granted.

*M. H. Boutelle and R. T. Boardman,*for appellant.

*Hodgson & Lowell,*for respondents.

1

 Reported in 122 N. W. 451.

Per Curiam.

Appeal by the traction company from an order of the district court of the county of Dakota denying its motion for a new trial in proceedings to acquire a right of way over the respondents’ farm. The only question submitted to the jury *537related to the amount of damages to be awarded to the respondents for the taking of their land.

The trial court gave to the jury this instruction: “Now, you will determine at the time the railroad took possession what would be the value of the one hundred sixty acres of land, taken as a whole, without the railroad upon it, but with the railroad near it. That, you see, will give the landowner the benefit of these general benefits which he is entitled to with his neighbors there who didn’t have the railroad running across their farms. Determine that question. Then determine the question of what is the value of the farm with the railroad upon it. The difference between those two sums is the true measure of damages in cases of this kind.”

The giving of this instruction is assigned as error. It was. Minneapolis, St. Paul, Rochester & Dubuque Electric Traction Co. v. Harkins, supra, page 478, 122 N. W. 450.

Order reversed and a new trial granted.
# C_2017268EN.01000501.xml

| 12.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 268/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 268/5

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2017/C 268/05)

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Tableware and kitchenware | The People’s Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 412/2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of ceramic tableware and kitchenware originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ L 131, 15.5.2013, p. 1). | 16.5.2018 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Tableware and kitchenware

The People’s Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 412/2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of ceramic tableware and kitchenware originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ L 131, 15.5.2013, p. 1).

16.5.2018

---

(1)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

1

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 01/22/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       48,292
COMMITMENTS
   2,626   14,145    1,687   43,371   31,937   47,684   47,769      608      523

CHANGES FROM 01/15/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -7,171)
     903      433   -3,788   -4,150   -3,378   -7,035   -6,733     -136     -438

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     5.4     29.3      3.5     89.8     66.1     98.7     98.9      1.3      1.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       44)
       4        9        7       24       21       34       32`

---

Updated January 25, 2013
# C_2017331EN.01000501.xml

| 3.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/5

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2017/C 331/07)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 23 August 2017 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 23 August 2017-31 December 2017 |
| Member State | Belgium |
| Stock or Group of stocks | PLE/7HJK. |
| Species | Plaice (pleuronectes platessa) |
| Zone | VIIh, VIIj and VIIk |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 17/TQ127 |

Date and time of closure

23 August 2017

Duration

23 August 2017-31 December 2017

Member State

Belgium

Stock or Group of stocks

PLE/7HJK.

Species

Plaice (pleuronectes platessa)

pleuronectes platessa

Zone

VIIh, VIIj and VIIk

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

17/TQ127

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
Briand WILLIAMS, Petitioner v. CALIFORNIA

No. 18-9186

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Reed Kirk MCDONALD, Petitioner, v. CITIBANK, N.A., et al.

No. 19-1171.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 26, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Colorado denied.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/23/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      359,429
COMMITMENTS
  94,898  154,053   75,119  168,762  105,610  338,779  334,782   20,650   24,647

CHANGES FROM 07/16/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,028)
  -2,237   25,322   -3,764    9,021  -18,329    3,020    3,229        8     -201

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    26.4     42.9     20.9     47.0     29.4     94.3     93.1      5.7      6.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      166)
      46       76       71       33       30      123      139
```

----

Updated July 26, 2013
John J. WILSON, Jr., Petitioner v. APEX REPORTING GROUP, INC., et al.

No. 19-5416

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Danny PEREDA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7984.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 4, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In connection with the
accompanying Quarterly Report of Modern City Entertainment, Inc.. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ending September 30, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, William Erfurth President and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2) The information contained in the
Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.




Modern
      City Entertainment Inc.Date:
      May 29, 2008
                By:
                /s/ William
      ErfurthWilliam
      ErfurthPresident
      and Director
**Exhibit 32(b)****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the filing of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TRW Automotive HoldingsCorp. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2005, with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph S. Cantie, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: November 1, 2005 /s/ JOSEPH S. CANTIE Joseph S. Cantie *Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer*
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  October 30, 2008
    /s/ JOHN C. PLANTJohn C. PlantChief Executive Officer and President

(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ JOSEPH S. CANTIEJoseph S. CantieExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer) 42
Shannon D. MCGEE, Sr., Petitioner v. Joseph MCFADDEN, Warden

No. 18-7277

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
IN RE Ricardo Jose Calderon LOPEZ, Petitioner.

No. 19-7466.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for *2636writ of mandamus dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Troy Lee BRIDGES, Petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

No. 19-5072

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Smith Barney Managed Governments Fund Inc.
125 Broad Street
New York, NY 10004




CERTIFICATION





I, Richard L. Peteka certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form N-SAR of Smith Barney Managed
Governments Fund Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial information included in this
report, and the financial statements on which the financial information
is based, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows
(if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash
flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report.

September 27, 2002



/s/ Richard L. Peteka

Richard L. Peteka
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
No. 6:24-cv-00009

Steven Lee Duvall,

Petitioner,

v.

Gregg County Sheriff,

Respondent.

ORDER 

This habeas corpus action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). On 

June 14, 2024, the magistrate judge issued a report recommending 

that respondent’s motion to dismiss be granted and this petition be 

dismissed as moot, and further recommending that a certificate of 

appealability be denied. Doc. 21. A copy of the report was mailed to 

the petitioner at his last known address. He did not file written objections.

When no party objects to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass 

v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satisfied that it 

contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation. The respondent’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 20) is granted, 

and the petition is dismissed without prejudice.

So ordered by the court on August 23, 2024.

J. CA MPBE LL BAR KE R

United States District Judge

Case 6:24-cv-00009-JCB-KNM Document 23 Filed 08/23/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 109
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: PELI POPOVICH HUNT,

Debtor.

______________________________

PELI POPOVICH HUNT,

Appellant,

v.

DANIEL A. CAPEN, M.D.; et al.,

Appellees. No. 14

- 55845

D.C. No. 2:12

- cv

- 06600

- MMM

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Margaret M. Morrow, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 26, 2017 **

Before: PAEZ, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Chapter 7 debtor Peli Popovich Hunt appeals pro se from the district court’s

order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order converting Hunt ’ s chapter 11

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUL 5 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 14

- 55845

bankruptcy proceeding to a chapter 7 proceeding. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 158(d) . We affirm

.

In the opening brief, Hunt fails to address how the bankruptcy court erred in

converting Hunt’s bankruptcy case . As a result, Hunt has waived her challenge to

the bankruptcy court’s order. See Smith v. Marsh , 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir.

1999) (“[O]n appeal, arguments not raised by a party in its opening brief are

deemed waived.”); Greenwood v. FAA , 28 F.3d 971, 977 (9th Cir. 1994) (“ We

review only issues which are argued specifically and distinctly in a party’s opening

brief. ”).

We reject as meritless Hunt’s contentions that the district court and

bankruptcy court lacked jurisdiction and demonstrated bias.

All pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                                5
<MULTIPLIER>                                          1,000
       
<S>                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                               9,602
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        6,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    46,281
<PP&E>                                             492,317
<DEPRECIATION>                                      52,525
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     486,073
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               26,278
<BONDS>                                            314,668
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                             51
<COMMON>                                               134
<OTHER-SE>                                         144,942
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       486,073
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    63,112
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       59,830<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  17,343
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      7,942
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  7,942
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     (1,017)<F2>
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         6,925
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
<FN>
<F1>Includes a non-recurring charge of $6,131 related to a binding loan
    commitment that the Company obtained on June 5, 1996.
<F2>Represents an extraordinary loss of $1,017 (net of minority interests in
    the amount of $3,263) on early extinguishment of debt.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>