alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(logo) CWCapital 

ASSETMANAGEMENT 

 

 

**Annual Statement as to Compliance**

**For the Period of January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018**

** **

** **

**WFCM 2016-NXS6**

 

 

In accordance with Item 1123of Regulation AB and with the requirements detailed in §11.09 of the Poolingand Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) for the above-mentioned CMBSpool, CWCapital Asset Management LLC (“CWCAM”), in its capacity as SpecialServicer, is providing this Officer’s Certificate with respect to the following:

 

(A)   a review of CWCAM’s activities duringthe preceding calendar year or portion thereof (the “Reporting Period”)and of CWCAM’s performance under the Agreement has been made under suchofficer’s supervision; and

 

(B)   to the best of such officer’sknowledge, based on such review, CWCAM has fulfilled all its obligations underthe Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

Should you have any questions,please do not hesitate to contact us.

 

Sincerely,

CWCapital Asset Management LLC

 

 

/s/James P. Shevlin

James P. Shevlin

President/Chief OperatingOfficer

 

 

7501 Wisconsin Avenue | Suite500 West | Bethesda, MD | 20814
<TABLE> <S> <C>

       
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Crossmann Communities, Inc.
Exhibit 27.3
Article 5 Financial Data Schedule for 1996 3rd Quarter 10-Q
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    Sep-30-1996
<CASH>                                    0
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                       113673963
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          0
<PP&E>                              4354384
<DEPRECIATION>                      1488312
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    127048500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     0
<BONDS>                            49692000
<COMMON>                           24059879
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                         29032090
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    127048500
<SALES>                           149764371
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  149764371
<CGS>                             118494310
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     118494310
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   667140
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    14712237
<INCOME-TAX>                        5862975
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 8849262
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                        8849262
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          1.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                          1.44


        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

SARAH CARTEE

v. 

BBK BUSINESS, LLC, ET AL.

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL NO. 4:24-CV-50-SDJ

ORDER

Plaintiff Sarah Cartee filed her Complaint on January 19, 2024. (Dkt. #1). 

Defendant BBK Business, LLC was served on April 29, 2024, making its answer due 

May 20, 2024. (Dkt. #5, #6). To date, BBK Business, LLC has not answered or 

otherwise filed a responsive pleading. Cartee also has not requested a clerk’s entry of 

default against BBK Business, LLC. It is therefore ORDERED that Cartee shall 

request a clerk’s entry of default on or before August 7, 2024, or risk dismissal for 

want of prosecution as to Defendant BBK Business, LLC.

Case 4:24-cv-00050-SDJ Document 8 Filed 07/25/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 21
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION 

THOMAS DOUGHERTY, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC 

and BMW FINANCIAL SERVICES N.A., LLC 

 Defendants. 

Case No.: 4:24-cv-00033-ALM 

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF 

COUNSEL 

Please withdraw the appearance of Jason W. McElroy and the law firm of Saul Ewing LLP 

on behalf of Defendant BMW Financial Service N.A., LLP. The law firm of Husch Blackwell 

LLP has made an appearance as attorneys for Defendant BMW Financial Services, N.A., LLC, in 

the above-captioned matter. Please direct all future communications and correspondence regarding 

the above-captioned matter to the attorneys from Husch Blackwell. 

SAUL EWING LLP 

 /s/ Jason W. McElroy

Jason W. McElroy (TX Bar No. 24108416) 

1919 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Suite 550 

Washington, D.C. 20006 

Tel: (202) 295-6642 

Fax: (202) 337-6065 

Jason.McElroy@saul.com 

Withdrawing Attorneys for 

BMW Financial Services, N.A., LLC 

 

Case 4:24-cv-00033-ALM Document 18 Filed 05/09/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 107
-2- 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I certify that, on May 9, 2024, I caused one copy of the foregoing Notice of Withdrawal 

to be served on all counsel and parties of record via the Court’s CM/ECF system. 

 /s/ Jason W. McElroy 

Jason W. McElroy 

Case 4:24-cv-00033-ALM Document 18 Filed 05/09/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 108
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

October 16, 2014

Before

MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

ROBERT M. DOW, JR., District Judge*

Nos. 12‐2621, 12‐2762

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeal from the United States District Court

Plaintiff–Appellant, for the Western District of Wisconsin

v. No. 3:07‐cr‐00080‐wmc‐1

QUADALE D. COLEMAN, William M. Conley, Chief Judge.

Defendant–Appellee.

______________________________________

QUADALE D. COLEMAN, Appeal from the United States District Court

Petitioner‐Appellee, for the Western District of Wisconsin

v. No. 3:10‐cv‐00736‐wmc

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, William M. Conely, Chief Judge.

Respondent‐Appellant.

O R D E R

No judge of the court having called for a vote on the Petition For Rehearing and

* The Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr., of the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by

designation.
Appeal nos. 12‐2621, 12‐2762 Page 2

Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc filed by Defendant‐Petitioner‐Appellee on

September 29, 2014, and all of the judges on the original panel having voted to deny the

same,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition For Rehearing and Suggestion for

Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the opinion issued in the above‐entitled case on

August 14, 2014, is hereby amended as follows:

The last sentence in the opinion is revised so that it reads:

“Based on our decision in Hawkins, the decision of the

district court in No. 12‐2621 resentencing Coleman is

VACATED, the decision in No. 12‐2762 granting the § 2255

motion is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED to the

district court for further proceedings consistent with this

opinion, including consideration of any remaining issues

presented in the § 2255 motion.”
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-22-0000551

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

STATE OF HAWAI I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

MAGNO D. FRANCO, Defendant-Appellant

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

HONOLULU DIVISION

(CASE NO. 1DTA-22-00838)

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF APPEAL

(By: Leonard, Presiding Judge, Hiraoka and Chan, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the Stipulation for Dismissal of

Appeal and Order, filed on September 29, 2022, by DefendantAppellant Magno D. Franco (Franco), it appears that (1) the

appeal was docketed on November 7, 2022; (2) under Hawai i Rules

of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 42(b), the parties stipulate

to dismiss the appeal; (3) the stipulation is dated and signed by

counsel for all parties appearing in the appeal; (4) attached to

the stipulation is Franco's declaration showing that he

understands the consequences of voluntary dismissal, consistent

with HRAP Rule 42(c); and (5) dismissal is authorized by HRAP

Rule 42(b) and (c).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the stipulation to

dismiss the appeal is approved, and the appeal is dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, December 14, 2022.

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard

Presiding Judge

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka

Associate Judge

/s/ Derrick H.M. Chan

Associate Judge

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-22-0000551

14-DEC-2022

07:55 AM

Dkt. 19 OAWST
Benjamin DENNERLEIN, Petitioner, v. Mark GARMAN, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Rockview, et al.

No. 19-8140.

Supreme Court of the United States.

June 1, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
# C_2018023EN.01000101.xml

| 23.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 23/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 23/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8687 — Prisko/OKD Nástupnická)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 23/01)

On 6 December 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8687. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8687. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 106 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 106

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2014, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Continuing 
Appropriations Act, 2014 (Public 

              

Law 113-46) is amended by striking the date specified in section 106(3) 
and inserting ``January 18, 2014''.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 14, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             H. J. RES. 106

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2014, and for 
                            other purposes.
```
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/17/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      119,326
COMMITMENTS
  22,529   11,211    4,568   83,917   97,572  111,014  113,351    8,312    5,975

CHANGES FROM 06/10/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      9,428)
   1,138     -472   -1,266    7,462    8,420    7,334    6,682    2,094    2,746

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    18.9      9.4      3.8     70.3     81.8     93.0     95.0      7.0      5.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       88)
      12        4        2       54       41       66       47
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/17/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      347,228
COMMITMENTS
 116,429   36,983    8,958  198,700  290,365  324,087  336,306   23,141   10,922

CHANGES FROM 06/10/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     26,094)
   5,974    4,321    5,143   10,185   11,795   21,302   21,259    4,792    4,835

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    33.5     10.7      2.6     57.2     83.6     93.3     96.9      6.7      3.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      213)
      67       30       22       93       66      173      106
```

----

Updated June 20, 2014
Gustavo DIAZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7733.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

HEADWATER PARTNERS II LLC, 

Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant, 

vs. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

§

Case No. 2:24-cv-00015-JRG-RSP 

(Lead Case) 

Jury Trial Demanded 

T-MOBILE USA, INC. AND SPRINT LLC, 

Defendants and Counterclaimant-Plaintiffs. 

HEADWATER PARTNERS II LLC, 

Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant, 

vs. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

§ 

Case No. 2:24-cv-00016-JRG-RSP 

(Member Case) 

Jury Trial Demanded 

AT&T SERVICES, INC., AT&T MOBILITY 

LLC AND AT&T CORP., 

Defendants and Counterclaimant-Plaintiffs. 

HEADWATER PARTNERS II LLC, 

Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant, 

vs. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

§

§

§ 

Case No. 2:24-cv-00007-JRG-RSP 

Jury Trial Demanded 

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, D/B/A VERIZON 

WIRELESS, AND VERIZON CORPORATE 

SERVICES GROUP INC., 

Defendants and Counterclaimant-Plaintiffs. 

DECLARATION OF JACOB K. BARON IN SUPPORT OF NOKIA OF AMERICA 

CORPORATION’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO INTERVENE 

I, Jacob K. Baron, declare the following: 

1. I am a partner in the law firm of Holland & Knight LLP, outside counsel for the 

Case 2:24-cv-00007-JRG-RSP Document 48-1 Filed 07/17/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 500
2 

Intervenor, Nokia of America Corporation (“Nokia”). I make this declaration in support of Nokia’s 

Unopposed Motion to Intervene (the “Motion”). The following facts are true to the best of my 

knowledge and, if called upon to do so, I could and would competently testify to the truth thereof. 

2. Before the Motion was filed, beginning on June 11, 2024, I met and conferred with 

Kris Davis and Jason Weitholter, outside counsel for Plaintiff Headwater Partners II LLC 

(“Headwater”). Outside counsel for Headwater informed me that Headwater does not oppose the 

Motion. 

3. Before the Motion was filed, I met and conferred with Jonathan Putman, in-house 

counsel for Defendants T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Sprint LLC (“T-Mobile”), Timothy Dyll, in-house 

counsel for Defendants AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T Mobility, LLC, and AT&T Corp. (“AT&T”), 

and Bukola Landis-Aina, in-house counsel for Defendants Cellco Partnership, d/b/a Verizon 

Wireless and Verizon Corporate Services Group Inc. (“Verizon”). In-house counsel for T-Mobile, 

AT&T and Verizon stated that they did not oppose the Motion. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Dated: July 17, 2024 /s/ Jacob K. Baron 

 Jacob K. Baron 

Case 2:24-cv-00007-JRG-RSP Document 48-1 Filed 07/17/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 501
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 2, 2012 

Order 

 

March 2, 2012 

142765(67) 

CHRISTINA McCAHAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 SC: 142765 

v COA: 292379 

Court of Claims: 08-000147-MZ 

SAMUEL KELLY BRENNAN, 

 Defendant, 

and 

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN REGENTS, 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

_____________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by the Michigan Association for Justice 

for leave to file a brief amicus curiae in this case is considered and it is granted.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

SIGNODE INDUSTRIAL GROUP LLC,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SAMUEL, SON & CO., LTD. et al, 

Defendants. 

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-CV-00080-JRG

ORDER

Before the Court is the Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Submit Protective Order and 

to Comply with the Document Production Requirements Under Paragraph 3 of the Discovery 

Order (the “Motion”) filed by Plaintiff Signode Industrial Group LLC and Samuel, Son & Co., 

Ltd. et al. (the “Parties”). (Dkt. No. 30.) In the Motion, the Parties request an extension of time 

from June 19, 2024 to June 27, 2024 to (1) submit a proposed protective order, and (2) comply 

with the document production requirements under Paragraph 3 of the Discovery Order. (Id. at 1.) 

The Parties state that they “have been, and are actively, working together to narrow the disputed 

issues in the Proposed Protective Order. Extending the deadline to file a Proposed Protective Order 

until June 27, 2024 will allow the parties an opportunity to further reduce their disputed issues in 

an attempt to reach an agreement on the issues therein.” (Id.) The Parties also request an extension 

of the deadline to comply with Paragraph 3 of the Discovery Order “to coincide with the parties’ 

submission of the Proposed Protective Order.” (Id.)

Having considered the Motion, and noting its joint nature, the Court finds that good cause 

exists to modify the Docket Control Order and that the Motion should be and hereby is 

GRANTED. Accordingly, the deadline for the Parties to file their proposed protective order and 

Case 2:24-cv-00080-JRG Document 32 Filed 06/21/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 325
2 

to comply with the document production requirements under Paragraph 3 of the Discovery Order 

is extended up to and including Thursday, June 27, 2024. 

So Ordered this

Jun 21, 2024

Case 2:24-cv-00080-JRG Document 32 Filed 06/21/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 326
Exhibit 21



G&L Realty Corp.

List of Subsidiaries

May 1, 2005



|    |  |                                                             
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|1.  |  | G&L Realty Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
|2.  |  | G&L Medical Partnership, L.P.                               
|2.  |  | 435 N. Roxbury Drive, Ltd., a California limited partnership
|3.  |  | G&L Grabel San Pedro, LLC                                   
|4.  |  | G&L Holy Cross, LLC                                         
|5.  |  | G&L Holy Cross Managers Corp., a California corporation     
|6.  |  | G&L Tustin, LLC                                             
|7.  |  | G&L Tustin Managers Corp., a California corporation         
|8.  |  | G&L Valencia, LLC                                           
|18. |  | G&L Lyons, LLC                                              
|19. |  | G&L Coronado (1998), LLC                                    
|20. |  | Lakeview Associates, LLC                                    
|21. |  | Tustin Heritage Place, LLC                                  
|22. |  | G&L Tustin II, LLC                                          
|23. |  | G&L Tustin III, LLC                                         
|24. |  | G&L Senior Care Partnership, L.P.                           
|25. |  | GLR/Yorba Linda, LLC                                        
|26. |  | 405 Bedford, LLC                                            
|27. |  | 415 Bedford, LLC                                            
|28. |  | 416 Bedford, LLC                                            
|29. |  | 435 Bedford, LLC                                            
|30. |  | G&L 436 Bedford, LLC                                        
|31. |  | G&L Sherman Oaks, LLC                                       
|32. |  | G&L 4150 Regents, LLC                                       
|33. |  | Paradigm Housing, LLC
```
 
 
WHEAT-HRSpring - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                          Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/29/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       70,335
COMMITMENTS
  22,278    6,728    2,839   29,074   45,187   54,191   54,754   16,144   15,581

CHANGES FROM 04/22/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,255)
     -16      581     -324   -2,016   -1,784   -2,356   -1,527    1,101      272

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    31.7      9.6      4.0     41.3     64.2     77.0     77.8     23.0     22.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       89)
      34        8       15       36       33       77       52
```

----

Updated May 2, 2014
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 10/07/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      365,241
COMMITMENTS
  82,526  132,464  102,270  156,902   99,515  341,698  334,249   23,543   30,992

CHANGES FROM 09/30/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      6,404)
  -6,148    2,271    8,353    3,483   -1,122    5,688    9,502      716   -3,098

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    22.6     36.3     28.0     43.0     27.2     93.6     91.5      6.4      8.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      187)
      45       78       84       41       40      146      158
```

----

Updated October 10, 2014
Tyrone PRICE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8361.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 26, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.