alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1997
<CASH>                                         617,561
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    259,956
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,267,793
<PP&E>                                      42,751,273
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,095,280
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              41,498,207
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,336,924
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        81,970
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,006,989
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                41,498,207
<SALES>                                     48,501,932
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            49,084,266
<CGS>                                       16,860,896
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               25,825,888
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             501,036
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,916,168
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,247,552
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,668,616
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 6:23-cr-00129

United States of America

v.

Willie J Scuderi

ORDER

This criminal action was referred to United States Magistrate 

Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3). Judge Love

held a final revocation hearing on April 30, 2024, and issued a report 

and recommendation recommending that defendant’s term of supervised release should be revoked. Doc. 11. Defendant waived his

right to object to the report, agreed to the revocation of his supervised release, agreed to the sentence below, and waived his right to 

be present for sentencing. Doc. 10.

Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and 

recommendation. The court orders that the defendant be sentenced 

to a period of 8 months imprisonment with no supervised release to 

follow. The court recommends that defendant serve his sentence at 

FCI Seagoville, Texas, if available.

So ordered by the court on May 6, 2024.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cr-00129-JCB-JDL Document 12 Filed 05/06/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 38
Arkeem Hakim JORDAN, Petitioner, v. NORTH CAROLINA.

No. 19-8181.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 26, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# C_2017383EN.01000402.xml

| 14.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 383/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 383/4

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its meeting on 29 September 2017 concerning a draft decision in Case AT.39813(2) — Baltic Rail

Rapporteur: Denmark

(2017/C 383/06)

| 1. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the basic amount of the fines. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the basic amount of the fines.

| 2. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines.

| 3. | The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal.

---
Aaron Moran BROWN, Petitioner, v. INDIANA.

No. 19-8057.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Indiana denied.
Exhibit D

Case 2:24-cv-00045-JRG Document 1-4 Filed 01/25/24 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 14
Notice of Service of Process

SLM / ALL

Transmittal Number: 28267630

Date Processed: 01/03/2024

Primary Contact: Sharon Brooks - MS 08-A

The Travelers Companies, Inc.

1 Tower Sq

Rm 8MS

Hartford, CT 06183-0001

Entity: Northfield Insurance Company

Entity ID Number 2319164

Entity Served: Northfield Insurance Company

Title of Action: Birdies In The Pines, LLC vs. Northfield Insurance Company

Matter Name/ID: Birdies In The Pines, LLC vs. Northfield Insurance Company (15058643)

Document(s) Type: Citation/Petition

Nature of Action: Contract

Court/Agency: Harrison County District Court , TX

Case/Reference No: 23-1287/F3F7178

Jurisdiction Served: Minnesota

Date Served on CSC: 01/03/2024

Answer or Appearance Due: 10:00 am Monday next Following the expiration of twenty days

Originally Served On: Travelers on 01/02/2024

How Served: Client Direct

Sender Information: David C. Carlile Law Firm

903-938-1655

Information contained on this transmittal form is for record keeping, notification and forwarding the attached document(s). It does not

constitute a legal opinion. The recipient is responsible for interpreting the documents and taking appropriate action.

To avoid potential delay, please do not send your response to CSC

251 Little Falls Drive, Wilmington, Delaware 19808-1674 (888) 690-2882 | sop@cscglobal.com

Case 2:24-cv-00045-JRG Document 1-4 Filed 01/25/24 Page 2 of 16 PageID #: 15
Case 2:24-cv-00045-JRG Document 1-4 Filed 01/25/24 Page 3 of 16 PageID #: 16
Case 2:24-cv-00045-JRG Document 1-4 Filed 01/25/24 Page 4 of 16 PageID #: 17
Case 2:24-cv-00045-JRG Document 1-4 Filed 01/25/24 Page 5 of 16 PageID #: 18
Case 2:24-cv-00045-JRG Document 1-4 Filed 01/25/24 Page 6 of 16 PageID #: 19
Case 2:24-cv-00045-JRG Document 1-4 Filed 01/25/24 Page 7 of 16 PageID #: 20
Case 2:24-cv-00045-JRG Document 1-4 Filed 01/25/24 Page 8 of 16 PageID #: 21
Case 2:24-cv-00045-JRG Document 1-4 Filed 01/25/24 Page 9 of 16 PageID #: 22
Case 2:24-cv-00045-JRG Document 1-4 Filed 01/25/24 Page 10 of 16 PageID #: 23
Case 2:24-cv-00045-JRG Document 1-4 Filed 01/25/24 Page 11 of 16 PageID #: 24
Case 2:24-cv-00045-JRG Document 1-4 Filed 01/25/24 Page 12 of 16 PageID #: 25
Case 2:24-cv-00045-JRG Document 1-4 Filed 01/25/24 Page 13 of 16 PageID #: 26
Case 2:24-cv-00045-JRG Document 1-4 Filed 01/25/24 Page 14 of 16 PageID #: 27
Case 2:24-cv-00045-JRG Document 1-4 Filed 01/25/24 Page 15 of 16 PageID #: 28
Case 2:24-cv-00045-JRG Document 1-4 Filed 01/25/24 Page 16 of 16 PageID #: 29
EXHIBIT 23.03

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-84726, 33-84728,
333-25981, and 333-114019) and Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement No. 333-86010 on Form S-3 of Paul-Son Gaming Corporation of our report
dated February 15, 2002, except for Note 10 as to which the date is April 23, 2002, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Paul-Son Gaming Corporation insofar
as our report relates to the financial statements of The Bud Jones Company, Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2001.

/s/BRADSHAW, SMITH & CO., LLP

Las
Vegas, Nevada
March 29, 2004

---
Vincent KANE, Petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 19-7605.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 26, 2020

Petition for rehearing denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6160

In Re: BILLY JOE PELFREY,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-99-693-3)

Submitted: March 22, 2001 Decided: March 30, 2001

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Billy Joe Pelfrey, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Billy Joe Pelfrey has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus

from this court seeking to have this court order the district court

handling his case to transfer his case to another district court,

to restore the filing time for all discovery, to seize various

records from the Defendants in his civil action, to order an investigation as to why Defendants do not have certain records, and

to make the results of such investigation known to him. Mandamus

is a drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary circumstances.

Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). Mandamus relief is only available when there are no other means by

which the relief sought could be granted, In re Beard, 811 F.2d

818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987), and may not be used as a substitute for

appeal. In re Catawba Indian Tribe, 973 F.2d 1133, 1135 (4th Cir.

1992). The party seeking mandamus relief carries the heavy burden

of showing that he has no other adequate means to attain the relief

he desires and that his entitlement to such relief is clear and

indisputable. Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc., 449 U.S. 33, 35

(1980). Pelfrey has not made that showing.

Accordingly, we deny mandamus relief. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 02/12/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      196,784
COMMITMENTS
  38,100   31,332   34,790  101,390  100,274  174,280  166,395   22,504   30,388

CHANGES FROM 02/05/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,398)
    -281      658    3,096       80   -3,263    2,895      491     -498    1,907

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    19.4     15.9     17.7     51.5     51.0     88.6     84.6     11.4     15.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      195)
      52       42       53       66       79      147      154
```

----

Updated February 15, 2013
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-2158

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Vicki Jo Crisco, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: August 29, 1997 Fi led: September 5, 1997

___________ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.

After Vicki Jo Crisco was arrested in Arkansas o n various st ate drug-trafficking offenses, a federal grand juryissued an indictment charging her with possessin g with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S .C. § 841(a)(1) (1994). Crisco moved to dismis s the indict ment, arguing that the indictment violated the Speedy Tri al Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161-3174 (1994), because it was filed more than thirty daysT heHonorable Garnett Thomas Eisele, United States District Judge for th e 1 Eastern District of Arkansas.
-2- after she was arrested. After the District Court denied 1 her motion , Crisco moved for reconsideration. The Court granted her motion for reconsideration and he ld a hearing on the mot ion to dismiss the indictment, which the court then denie d. Crisco subsequently entered into a written plea agreement with the government, pleading guilty t o the § 841(a)(1) charge without reserving her right t o appe al the denial of her motion to dismiss th e indictment. Crisco appeals, and we affirm.

As Cri sco did not condition her guilty plea by rese rving her right to raise her speedy-trial claim o n appeal, we conclude that she waived any such claim. See Unite dStates v. Cox , 985 F.2d 427, 433 (8th Cir. 1993 ) (noting that guilty plea waives claim that Speedy Tria l Act was vi olated); United States v. Gines , 964 F.2d 972, 977 (10th Cir. 1992) (holding that even though party had
move dto dismiss for Speedy Trial Act violation , subsequent guilty plea waived right to raise speedy-trial claim on appeal), cert. denied , 506 U.S. 1069 (1993).

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHT H CIRCUIT.
Ronald Ray HENRY, Petitioner v. Terema CARLIN, Warden.

No. 18-9544

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Lease Contract



 Exhibit 10.18 
 Lease Contract 
 Lessor (Party A): Zhiguo Wang 

Lessee (Party B): Harbin Yew Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd. 
 This Contract is enacted according to “Contract Law of the People’s Republic of China” and the Parties hereby agreed as follows: 

 

	1.	 Party A agreed to lease the property with a construction area of 92.8m2 (5th Floor, Zone B, Far East Building, Hengshan Road 18, Xiangfang District, Harbin City) to Party B for office use.



  

	2.	Lease term 

 The lease term will
be 15 years, from January 1, 2010 when Party A provides the premise to Party B, to December 31, 2025 when Party B returns the premise to Party A. 
  

	3.	Payment 

 RMB 15,000 per
year. 
  

	4.	Modification and termination 


This Contract can be modified or terminated when both parties agree. Otherwise, any modification and termination will be deemed as breach
of contract. 
  

	5.	If the negotiation fails to resolve the controversy, each party or both parties may submit the outstanding issue to court in accordance with “Contract Law of the
People’s Republic of China”. 

 This agreement is in duplicate, each party will hold one copy.

 Lessor: (Sign or Chop) Zhiguo Wang 

Lessee: (Sign or Chop) 
 Harbin Yew Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd. 

Xingming Han 
 January 1, 2010
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Eastern District of Texas

12/8/2023

Case 2:23-cv-00582-JRG Document 5 Filed 12/08/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 43
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) . I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

Other (specify):

. My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 2:23-cv-00582-JRG Document 5 Filed 12/08/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 44
### TEX A S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-05-00386- CV Ost e oim pla ntTe c hnol og y, Inc . , App e lla nt

v. Herber t D. Hud dleston, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COU NTY, 353RD JUDICIAL DISTRI CT NO. GN500743 , HONO RABLE MARGARET A. COOPER, JUDGE PRESIDING

ME MO R

A ND UMO P I N I O N Appellant Osteoimplant T echnology, Inc. has filed a motion to dismiss , stating that it h a s d eci ded no t to pur su e its a pp e a l. W e gr ant t

he mot ion

and dis mis s th e a

pp e a l. T e x. R. App. P . 42. 1(a) .

__________________________________________ D avid P ur year , Justice B efor e C hief Justice L aw, Justices B . A. S mith and P ur year D ismiss ed on Appe llant’s M otion F iled: August 26, 2005
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

CELERITY IP, LLC, ET AL. 

 Plaintiffs,

v.

LG ELECTRONICS, INC., ET AL.,

Defendants.

 Civil Action No. 2:23-CV-00316-JRG-RSP

 

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendants LG Electronics Inc.’s and LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc.’s 

Unopposed Motion for Extension of Deadlines in Court’s Order Re Scheduling/Case Management 

Conference. After consideration of the same, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should 

be and hereby is GRANTED. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the deadlines are extended as follows: 

(1) Comply with P.R. 3-1 and 3-2 up to and including December 4, 2023; (2) Join Additional 

Parties up to and including December 28, 2023; (3) File Proposed Protective Order and Comply 

with Paragraphs 1 & 3 of the Discovery Order (Initial and Additional Disclosures) up to and 

including January 8, 2024; (4) Comply with P.R. 3-3 and 3-4 up to and including 

January 29, 2024; and (5) Comply with Standing Order Regarding Subject-Matter Eligibility 

Contentions up to and including January 29, 2024. 

Case 2:23-cv-00316-JRG-RSP Document 16-1 Filed 11/13/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 165
Sekou KOUYATE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION.

No. 19-5562

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/14/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       87,228
COMMITMENTS
  23,420    4,010    1,737   56,417   79,590   81,574   85,337    5,654    1,891

CHANGES FROM 05/07/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -620)
     613     -439      -21   -1,344     -160     -752     -620      132        0

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    26.8      4.6      2.0     64.7     91.2     93.5     97.8      6.5      2.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       80)
      12        4        1       41       36       53       41
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/14/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      200,875
COMMITMENTS
  63,576   34,699    1,229  119,427  159,260  184,232  195,188   16,643    5,687

CHANGES FROM 05/07/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -167)
  -2,143    2,188       20    1,442   -2,690     -681     -482      514      315

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    31.6     17.3      0.6     59.5     79.3     91.7     97.2      8.3      2.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      145)
      38       17        7       70       48      112       68
```

----

Updated May 17, 2013
Exhibit F

Case 2:24-cv-00021-JRG Document 54-7 Filed 07/18/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 3121
Case 2:24-cv-00021-JRG Document 54-7 Filed 07/18/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 3122
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> US 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1.0

<CASH>                                          10,286
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,216
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (125)
<INVENTORY>                                      4,675
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,345
<PP&E>                                           9,587
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,323)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,298
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,476
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            52
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,770
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,298
<SALES>                                         59,096
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                59,096
<CGS>                                           23,234
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,738
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   104
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,360
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,208
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,152
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,152
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.99
        



</TABLE>
SMITH BARNEY INVESTMENT TRUST
on behalf of
SMITH BARNEY LARGE CAPITALIZATION GROWTH FUND


Supplement dated July 6, 2000
to the Prospectus dated March 29, 2000


The name of the Smith Barney Large Capitalization Growth
Fund, one of the funds comprising the Trust, has not changed
and remains the same.