T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T CHEN HA LE , P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. VA C AV I L L E HO US I NG AU T HO R I T Y, D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 11- 15693 D . C . N o . 2 : 0 9 - c v - 0 0 3 9 1 - J A MK JN ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia J ohn A . M e nde z , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r13, 2012 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , T R O T T , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C hen H al e app ea l s pro se fr om the di stri ctcourt ’ s j ud gm entdi sm i ss i ng her ac t i on al l egi ng thatthe V ac avi l l e H ou si ng A utho ri ty ( “ V H A ”) di sc ri m i nat ed agai nsther on the basi s of hernat i on al ori gi n and di sabi l i ty by t erm i nat i ng her 

# FI LED NO V 29 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 15693 2 pa rt i c i pa t i on i n the S e c t i on 8 hous i ng a s s i s t a nc e pr ogr a m . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o , C olonyC ov e P r ops . , L L Cv . C i t yof Cars on , 6 4 0 F. 3 d 9 4 8 , 9 5 5 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 1 1 ) , a n dw e a f f i rm. T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l ydi s m i s s e d H a l e ’ s c l a i m s r e gar di ng the m e r i t s of V H A ’ s de c i s i on t o t e rm i na t e he ra s s i s t a nc e be c aus e H a l e i s pr e c l ude d unde rthe do ctri ne of exhaust i on of j ud i ci al re m edi es fr om re l i t i gat i ng the m er i t s i n federa l c o u rt. Se e Sk

ys ig n I n t’ l, I n c . v . C ityo

f H o n o lu lu , 27 6 F . 3d 11 09 , 11 15 (9th C i r. 2002) ( f e de r a l c ourt s a c c or d s t a t e a dm i ni s tr a t i ve a dj udi c a t i ons the s a m e pr e c l us i ve e f f e c t th e yw o u ldh a v e in s ta te c o u rt) ; R unyon v. B d. of T rs . of Cal . State U

ni v. , 2 2 9 P .3 d9 8 5 , 9 9 4 ( C a l. 2 0 1 0 ) ( “G e n e r a llys p e a k in g , if ac o m p la in a n t f

a ils to ove rturn a n a dve r s e a dm i ni s tr a t i ve de c i s i on byw r i tof m a nda t e , a nd i f

the a dm i ni s tr a t i ve pr oc e e di ng pos s e s s e d the r e qui s i t e j udi c i a l c ha r a c t e r , the a d m in is tr a tiv e d e c is io n is b in d in g in ala te rc iv il a c tio n b r o u g h t in s u p e r io rc o u rt.” (c i t at i on s and i nt ernal qu ot at i on m arks om i tt ed)) . T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l ydi s m i s s e d H a l e ’ s c l a i m s unde rthe A m e r i c a ns w ith D is ab ilitie s A c t a n d T itle V I o f th e C iv il R ig h ts A c t o f 1 9 6 4 b e c au s e H a le f a i l e d t o a l l e ge f

a c t s s uf f i c i e ntt o s how tha tV H A t e rm i na t e d he rS e c t i on 8 a s s is ta n c e o n a c c o u n t o f h e rn a tio n a l o r ig in o rb e c au s e o f h e rd is ab ility . See D arensburg v. Metro. T ransp. C om m ’n , 6 3 6 F .3 d5 1 1 , 5 2 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 1 ) ( T itle11- 15693 3 V I p r o h ib its o n lyin te n tio n a l d is c r im in a tio n ) ; W e i nr e i c h v . L . A . Cnt

y . Me tr o. T r ans p. A uth. , 1 1 4 F . 3 d 9 7 6 , 9 7 8 ( 9 th C i r . 1 9 9 7 ) ( e x p l a i n i n g th a tt o s h o w a vi ol a t i on of

the A D A , apl a i nt i f

f m us ts how tha tthe de ni a l of be ne f i t s or di sc ri m i nat i on w as “ by re as on of [her ] di sabi l i ty” ). T h e d i stri ctco u rtd i d n o tab u se i t s d i scret i o n b y d ecl i n i n g t o ex erci se supp l em ent al j uri sdi ct i on ov erH al e’ s s t at e l aw cl ai m s a ft erdi sm i ss i ng her f eder al c la im s w ith o u t le a v e to a m e n d . See 28 U . S . C . § 1367( c ) ( 3) . W e c ons true the d is m is s a l o f

th e s ta te la w c la im s to b e w ith o u t p r e ju d ic e . Se e G i niv . L as V egas Metro. P ol i ce D ep’t , 40 F . 3d 10 41 , 10 46 (9th C i r. 19 94 ). H a le ’s c o n te n tio n th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt ab u s e dits d is c r e tio n b yf a ilin g to grantl eave t o am end h ercom pl ai ntsua s po nt e i s unp er suas i ve. W e d o n o t c o n s id e rm a tte r s r a is e df o rth e f ir s t tim e o n ap p e a l. See Sm i th v. M a rsh , 194 F . 3d 1045, 1052 ( 9th C i r . 1999) . W e a l s o do notc ons i de ra ny d o c u m e n ts th a t a r e n o t p a rt o f th e d is tr ic t c o u rt r e c o r d . See Ki rs hn erv. U ni den C o r p . o f A m. , 84 2 F . 2d 10 74 , 10 77 (9th C i r. 19 88 ). A l l pe ndi ng m ot i ons a r e de ni e d. AF F I RME D.