alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 108 (Monday, June 6, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 34278]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12042]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the National Cancer 
Institute Council of Research Advocates.
    The meeting will be held as a virtual meeting and is open to the 
public. Individuals who plan to view the virtual meeting and need 
special assistance or other reasonable accommodations to view the 
meeting, should notify the Contact Person listed below in advance of 
the meeting. The meeting will be videocast and can be accessed from the 
NIH Videocasting and Podcasting website (http://videocast.nih.gov).

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Council of Research 
Advocates.
    Date: June 29, 2022.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: Welcome and Chairman's Remarks, NCI Updates, Legislative 
Update, and Acting Director's Update.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Amy Williams, NCI Office of Advocacy Relations, 
National Cancer Institute, NIH, 31 Center Drive, Building 31, Room 
10A28, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-9723, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#87f0eeebebeee6e6eac7eae6eeeba9e9eeefa9e0e8f1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="26514f4a4a4f47474b664b474f4a08484f4e08414950">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: NCRA: http://deainfo.nci.nih.gov/advisory/ncra/ncra.htm, where 
an agenda and any additional information for the meeting will be 
posted when available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS).

    Dated: May 31, 2022.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-12042 Filed 6-3-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Pedro Medina CASTILLON, Petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 19-5370

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District denied.
Tyree WRIGHT, Petitioner, v. S. ALVAREZ, et al.

No. 19-7565.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
IN RE Ellis KEYES, Petitioner

No. 18-9826

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
ACTAVIS LABORATORIES FL, INC., Petitioner, v. NALPROPION PHARMACEUTICALS LLC.

No. 19-1131.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 26, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET-WTI - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                      Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/09/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      424,417
COMMITMENTS
  66,844   47,115  103,572  239,614  260,794  410,030  411,481   14,387   12,936

CHANGES FROM 12/02/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     10,831)
  -8,955     -381    6,960   12,628    5,295   10,633   11,874      198   -1,043

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    15.7     11.1     24.4     56.5     61.4     96.6     97.0      3.4      3.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      121)
      29       26       48       60       57      113      108
```

----

Updated December 12, 2014
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

 Plaintiff,

v.

ACTIVISION PUBLISHING, INC.,

 Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-cv-00043-JRG-RSP

ORDER

Before the Court is the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal (the “Stipulation”) filed by Display 

Technologies, LLC (“Plaintiff”) and Activision Publishing, Inc. (“Defendant”). (Dkt. No. 11.) In 

the Stipulation, the parties represent that the above-captioned case has been resolved and request 

dismissal of the above-captioned action WITH prejudice. (Id. at 1.) 

Having considered the Stipulation, the Court ACCEPTS AND ACKNOWLEDGES that 

all claims and causes of action asserted between Plaintiff and Defendant in the above-captioned 

case are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party is to bear its own costs, expenses, and 

attorneys’ fees. All pending requests for relief in the above-captioned case not explicitly granted 

herein are DENIED AS MOOT. 

The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the above-captioned case.

.

____________________________________

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 26th day of April, 2024.

Case 2:24-cv-00043-JRG-RSP Document 12 Filed 04/26/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 192
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 4.3


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       TO

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                               LEGEND MOBILE, INC.

         LEGEND MOBILE, INC., a corporation organized and existing under and by
virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

         DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

         FIRST: That the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is
hereby amended by striking out the first sentence of Article 5 thereof and
substituting in lieu of said sentence the following new sentence:

         "5. The aggregate number of shares which the corporation shall have the
         authority to issue is twenty million (20,000,000) shares of Common
         Stock, having a par value of $0.001 per share, and one million
         (1,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock, having a par value of $0.01 per
         share."

         All other aspects of Article 5 shall remain unchanged.

         SECOND: That the foregoing amendment was duly adopted in accordance
with the provisions of 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said LEGEND MOBILE, INC. has caused this
Certificate to be signed by Peter Klamka, its Chief Executive Officer and
Secretary, this 12th day of December, 2003.



                                          LEGEND MOBILE, INC.

                                          By: /s/ Peter Klamka
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Peter Klamka
                                             Chief Executive Officer & Secretary
EXHIBIT 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Each director and/or officer of Dominion Homes, Inc. (the
Corporation) whose signature appears below hereby appoints Douglas G. Borror and William G. Cornely as the undersigneds attorneys, or either of them individually as the undersigneds attorney, to sign, in the
undersigneds name and behalf and in any and all capacities stated below, and to cause to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission), the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K (the Form
10-K) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, and likewise to sign and file with the Commission any and all amendments to the Form 10-K, and the Corporation hereby also appoints such persons as its attorneys-in-fact and each of
them as its attorney-in-fact with like authority to sign and file the Form 10-K and any amendments thereto granting to each such attorney-in-fact full power of substitution and revocation, and hereby ratifying all that any such attorney-in-fact or
the undersigneds substitute may do by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we
have hereunto set our hands this 14thday of March, 2007.



|                        |  |                                                               
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|Signature               |  | Title                                                         
|                        | 
|/s/ Douglas G. Borror   |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                          
|Douglas G. Borror       |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                                 
|                        | 
|/s/ William G. Cornely  |  | Senior Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer   
|William G. Cornely      |  | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
|                        | 
|/s/ David S. Borror     |  | Vice Chairman                                                 
|David S. Borror         |  |                                                               
|                        | 
|/s/ David P. Blom       |  | Director                                                      
|David P. Blom           |  |                                                               
|                        | 
|/s/ R. Andrew Johnson   |  | Director                                                      
|R. Andrew Johnson       |  |                                                               
|                        | 
|/s/ Robert R. McMaster  |  | Director                                                      
|Robert R. McMaster      |  |                                                               
|                        | 
|/s/ Carl A. Nelson, Jr. |  | Director                                                      
|Carl A. Nelson, Jr.     |  |                                                               
|                        | 
|/s/ Zuheir Sofia        |  | Director                                                      
|Zuheir Sofia            |  |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000911583
<NAME> STEINWAY MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-2000
<CASH>                                           8,410
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   67,779
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,831
<INVENTORY>                                     99,951
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               178,845
<PP&E>                                         123,859
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,105
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 315,105
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           48,621
<BONDS>                                        131,776
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                     102,125
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   315,105
<SALES>                                         87,775
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                87,775
<CGS>                                           61,171
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,549
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   883
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    50
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,365
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,757
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,550
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,207
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,207
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .58


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

LAWRENCE WENDELL FEW,

 Appellant,

v.

CATHERINE JEANNE FEW,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

 § 

No. 08-06-00207-CV

Appeal from the

388th Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2003CM4130) 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion for determination whether the case

should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Finding that Appellant has not paid the fee for the

filing of the clerk’s record, nor shown himself entitled to a free appellate record, we dismiss the

appeal for want of prosecution.

Appellant filed a notice of appeal on July 25, 2006. Appellant has not paid for, or

arranged for payment for the clerk’s record in this appeal. The Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure provide that while it is the district clerk’s responsibility to prepare the record, the

appellant must either pay for the preparation of the record, or show himself entitled to appeal

without paying the fee. See TEX.R.APP.P. 35.3(a)(2). If a clerk’s record is not filed because the

appellant has failed to pay the fee for preparing the record, we may, after giving the appellant

reasonable opportunity to cure, dismiss the appeal on our own motion. TEX.R.APP.P. 37.3(b). 

By letter dated October 16, 2008, the clerk of this Court notified Appellant in writing of

our intent to dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution due to his failure to arrange for payment
-2-

and filing of the clerk’s record, unless, within ten days of the date the notice, any party could

show grounds for continuing the appeal. Appellant has not responded. Accordingly, we hereby

dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. TEX.R.APP.P. 37.3(b).

November 25, 2008

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Chief Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Carr, JJ.

McClure, J., Not Participating
Billy BATTENFIELD, Petitioner, v. OKLAHOMA.

No. 19-7350.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma denied.
EXHIBIT 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BCTC V Assignor Corp. (the "registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|                |  |                            
|--------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:           |  |                            
|August 13, 2010 |  | /s/ John P. Manning        
|                |  |                            
|                |  | John P. Manning            
|                |  | Principal Executive Officer
|                |  |                            
|                |  |                            



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

```

----

Updated January 17, 2014
IN RE Melvin BONNELL, Petitioner.

No. 19-6863.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 6, 2020

Petition for rehearing denied.
Jean-Gespere PIERRE, petitioner, v. FJC SECURITY SERVICES, Inc.

No. 18-6101.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
No. 6:24-cv-00038

Matthew Jones,

Plaintiff,

v.

FNU Johnson et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

Plaintiff Matthew Jones, a prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this 

civil suit without paying the filing fee. The case was transferred to 

this court for proper venue and referred to United States Magistrate 

Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).

On April 22, 2024, the magistrate judge issued a report recommending that this case be dismissed without prejudice due to plaintiff’s failure to comply with the court’s order to file an amended 

complaint and pay the filing fee or submit an application to proceed 

in forma pauperis. Docs. 4, 6. A copy of the report was mailed to 

plaintiff, who received it on April 25, 2024. Doc. 7. Plaintiff did not 

file written objections.

When no party objects to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass 

v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satisfied that it 

contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation. This case is dismissed without prejudice.

So ordered by the court on June 10, 2024.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:24-cv-00038-JCB-JDL Document 8 Filed 06/10/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 38
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,561
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,023
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,080
<INVENTORY>                                    123,395
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               195,149
<PP&E>                                         407,425
<DEPRECIATION>                                 138,410
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 525,442
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          201,764
<BONDS>                                        938,392
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     19,500
<COMMON>                                           646
<OTHER-SE>                                   (893,873)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   525,442
<SALES>                                        380,309
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               380,309
<CGS>                                          264,538
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   95,678
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,380
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,811
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,098)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       213
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,311)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (7,390)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (23,701)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.38)
        

</TABLE>
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

VIRTAMOVE, CORP.,

Plaintiff,

v.

HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE 

COMPANY,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Case No. 2:24-cv-00093-JRG

(Lead Case)

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

VIRTAMOVE, CORP.,

Plaintiff,

v.

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS 

MACHINES CORP.,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Case No. 2:24-cv-00064-JRG

(Member Case)

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

DEFENDANT IBM’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

REPLY REGARDING MOTION TO TRANSFER (DKT. 78)

Defendant International Business Machines Corp. (“IBM”) respectfully moves for a two 

and a half-week extension of time for IBM to files its reply in support of its Motion to Transfer 

Venue to the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (Dkt. 78).

With a two and a half-week extension from September 30, 2024, the deadline for IBM to 

file its reply would be extended to October 16, 2024. This extension is not being sought for 

purpose of delay, but rather to ensure that IBM has adequate time to address the issues raised in 

Plaintiff’s Opposition to IBM’s Motion to Transfer (Dkt. 82) and receive new discovery Plaintiff 

has agreed to produce in connection with that Opposition.

Counsel for the parties have conferred and all parties stipulate to this extension. 

Case 2:24-cv-00093-JRG Document 85 Filed 09/26/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 4067
2

Accordingly, IBM requests that the Court grant the motion and enter the attached proposed Order.

Dated: September 26, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Kyle A. Calhoun

Brandon H. Brown 

California State Bar No. 266347 

Kyle A. Calhoun (pro hac vice)

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

555 California Street 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 439-1400

Facsimile: (415) 439-1500

Email: brandon.brown@kirkland.com

Email: kyle.calhoun@kirkland.com

Todd M. Friedman (pro hac vice) 

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

601 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

Telephone: (212) 446-4800 

Facsimile: (212) 446-4900 

Email: todd.friedman@kirkland.com 

Of Counsel:

Andrea L. Fair

Texas State Bar No. 24078488

WARD, SMITH & HILL, PLLC

1507 Bill Owens Parkway

Longview, TX 75604

Telephone: (903) 757-6400

Facsimile: (903) 757-2323

Email: andrea@wsfirm.com

Attorneys for Defendant

International Business Machines Corp.

Case 2:24-cv-00093-JRG Document 85 Filed 09/26/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 4068
3

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

The undersigned hereby certifies that counsel has complied with the meet and confer 

requirement in Local Rule CV-7(h) and that this is a joint motion.

/s/ Kyle A. Calhoun

Kyle A. Calhoun

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have 

consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s 

CM/ECF system pursuant to Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on September 26, 2024.

/s/ Kyle A. Calhoun

Kyle A. Calhoun

Case 2:24-cv-00093-JRG Document 85 Filed 09/26/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 4069