alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017393EN.01000301.xml

| 21.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 393/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 393/3

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2153 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine apply

(2017/C 393/03)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (2), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2153 (3).

2

3

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, as implemented by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2153.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (4).

4

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.

2

(3)  OJ L 304, 21.11.2017, p. 3.

3

(4)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

4

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATION AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000918904
<NAME> THE SELMER COMPANY INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-03-1999
<CASH>                                           6,806
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   66,515
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,661
<INVENTORY>                                     92,282
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               166,937
<PP&E>                                         115,009
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,812
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 306,531
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,890
<BONDS>                                        133,451
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      99,767
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   306,531
<SALES>                                         82,388
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                82,388
<CGS>                                           55,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,649
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,638
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    51
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,870
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,980
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,740
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,240
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,240
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 5,240.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 5,240.00
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1152

JANET GRANOFSKY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BALTIMORE GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY; ASPLUNDH

TREE EXPERT COMPANY,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

BF&M TEMPORARIES,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. M. J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-93-

4175-MJG)

Submitted: May 1, 1997 Decided: May 8, 1997

Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Janet Granofsky, Appellant Pro Se. Luther Ellis Justis, Jr.,

BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, Baltimore, Maryland; Mark D.

Laponsky, Willis Gunther Ferlise, SEMMES, BOWEN & SEMMES, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
2
3

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's orders granting the

Appellees' motions for summary judgment on Appellant's complaint,

which alleged sexual harassment, gender discrimination, and retaliatory discharge from her employment. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Granofsky v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co., No. CA-93-4175-

MJG (D. Md. June 10 and Apr. 1, 1996). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
153.2-/? FILE COPY

COA# 08-13-00132-CR OFFENSE: 49.04

Valerie Renee Crane v. The

STYLE: state of Texas COUNTY: Tarrant

COA DISPOSITION: Affirm

DATE: 10/15/2014

TRIAL COURT: County Crim Ct No 9

Publish: No TC CASE #: 1257243

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

ELECTRONIC RECORD

Valerie Renee Crane v. The

STYLE: State of Texas

APSjELLAjA/T^ Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE:

JUDGE:

CCA#:

CCA Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:.

PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

\SML-H

PC:

DNP:

MOTION FOR
Oliver M. BOLING, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, et al.

No. 19-5021

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
 
                                 EXHIBIT 23.1
                                 ------------



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference
of our report included in this Form 10-K, into Charles E. Smith Residential
Realty, Inc.'s previously filed Registration Statement File No. 33-82382,
Registration Statement File No. 33-93986, Registration Statement File No. 33-
80835, Registration Statement File No. 333-340, Registration Statement File No.
333-8129, and Registration Statement File No. 333-17053.

                                                /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

                                                ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Washington, D.C.
March 27, 1997




                                      E-2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

RICHARD EDWARDS §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-cv-443

BEAUMONT BONE AND JOINT, ET AL. §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Richard Edwards, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit. This matter was

referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and the Amended Order

for the Adoption of Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to the United States Magistrate Judge

for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case.

Procedural Background

The court previously entered a Preliminary Filing Fee Order directing Plaintiff to either pay

the filing fee or submit a properly certified application to proceed in forma pauperis showing

deposits into his inmate trust account during the preceding six month period. Plaintiff was given

20 days to comply with the court’s Order. The time for complying with the Order has expired. 

However, Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Order.

Discussion

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) authorizes a district court to dismiss an action for

failure to prosecute or for failure to comply with any court order. Larson v. Scott, 157 F.3d 1030,

1031 (5th Cir. 1998). “This authority [under Rule 41(b)] flows from the court's inherent power to

control its docket and prevent undue delays in the disposition of pending cases.” Boudwin v.

Graystone Ins. Co., Ltd., 756 F.2d 399, 401 (5th Cir. 1985) (citing Link v. Wabash, R.R. Co., 370

U.S. 626, 629 (1962)).

By failing to comply with the Order described above, Plaintiff has failed to diligently

prosecute this lawsuit. As a result, this case should be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Case 1:23-cv-00443-MJT-CLS Document 4 Filed 01/18/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 13
Recommendation

This civil rights lawsuit should be dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Objections

Objections must be (1) specific, (2) in writing, and (3) served and filed within 14 days after

being served with a copy of this report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED.R.CIV. P. 6(a), 6(b) and 72(b).

A party’s failure to object bars that party from (1) entitlement to de novo review by a district

judge of proposed findings and recommendations, Rodriguez v. Bowen, 857 F.2d 275, 276-77 (5th

Cir. 1988), and (2) appellate review, except on grounds of plain error, of unobjected-to factual

findings and legal conclusions accepted by the district court, Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n.,

79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

2

.

___________________________________

Christine L Stetson

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SIGNED this the 18th day of January, 2024.

Case 1:23-cv-00443-MJT-CLS Document 4 Filed 01/18/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 14
# C_2018227EN.01010301.xml

| 28.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 227/103 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 227/103

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Repealing Regulation (EU) No 256/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the notification to the Commission of investment projects in energy infrastructure within the European Union’

(COM(2017) 769 final — 2017/347 (COD))

(2018/C 227/17)

| Consultation | European Parliament, 15.1.2018
  Council of the European Union, 11.1.2018 |
| --- | --- |
| Legal basis | Article 194 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union |
| Section responsible | Transport, Energy, Infrastructure and the Information Society |
| Adopted at plenary | 14.2.2018 |
| Plenary session No | 532 |
| Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions) | 192/0/2 |

Consultation

European Parliament, 15.1.2018

Council of the European Union, 11.1.2018

Legal basis

Article 194 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Section responsible

Transport, Energy, Infrastructure and the Information Society

Adopted at plenary

14.2.2018

Plenary session No

532

Outcome of vote

(for/against/abstentions)

192/0/2

Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 532nd plenary session of 14 and 15 February 2018 (meeting of 14 February), by 192 votes with 2 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 14 February 2018.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Georges DASSIS

---
John DOE 1, et al., Petitioners, v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION.

No. 19-484.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
IN RE Charles S. RENCHENSKI, Petitioner.

No. 19-7894.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 6, 2020

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/30/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      308,318
COMMITMENTS
  82,858  102,440   89,052  118,345   88,759  290,255  280,251   18,063   28,067

CHANGES FROM 12/23/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -16,958)
  -3,827   -3,108   -8,446    1,791      453  -10,482  -11,101   -6,476   -5,857

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    26.9     33.2     28.9     38.4     28.8     94.1     90.9      5.9      9.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      150)
      41       61       64       32       33      111      129
```

----

Updated January 2, 2015
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT
TO SECTION 302 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Daniel M. Gottlieb, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of G&L Realty Corp.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other
certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):



a) all significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                         
|-------------------------
|Date: May 16, 2005       
|                         
|/s/    Daniel M. Gottlieb
|Daniel M. Gottlieb       
|Chief Executive Officer
Michael C. JAMERSON, Petitioner, v. Jason LEWIS, Warden.

No. 19-7813.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 6, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri denied.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS, 

LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE B-12 STORE, LLC,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00320-JRG-RSP

STIPULATED MOTION FOR DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff 

Symbology Innovations, LLC (“Symbology”) and Defendant The B-12 Store, LLC (“B-12”)

(collectively, the “Parties”) respectfully submit this stipulation of dismissal of Symbology’s 

claims against B-12 with prejudice and B-12’s counterclaims against Symbology without 

prejudice. Each party is to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees.

Case 2:23-cv-00320-JRG-RSP Document 14 Filed 12/08/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 166
2

Dated: December 5, 2023 Respectfully Submitted

/s/ Randall Garteiser

M. Scott Fuller

 Texas Bar No. 24036607

 sfuller@ghiplaw.com

Randall Garteiser 

 Texas Bar No. 24038912

 rgarteiser@ghiplaw.com

Christopher A. Honea

 Texas Bar No. 24059967

 chonea@ghiplaw.com

GARTEISER HONEA, PLLC

119 W. Ferguson Street

Tyler, Texas 75702

Telephone: (903) 705-7420

Facsimile: (903) 405-3999

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

/s/ Alexander Hale Martin

Alexander Hale Martin

Texas Bar No. 24091828

Neil J. McNabnay

Texas Bar No. 24002583

Ricardo J. Bonilla

Texas Bar No. 24082704

Rodeen Talebi

Texas Bar No. 24103958

Ashu Balimba

Texas Bar No. 24099369

martin@fr.com

mcnabnay@fr.com

rbonilla@fr.com

talebi@fr.com

balimba@fr.com

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

1717 Main Street, Suite 5000

Dallas, Texas 75201

(214) 747-5070 (Telephone)

(214) 747-2091 (Facsimile)

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

Case 2:23-cv-00320-JRG-RSP Document 14 Filed 12/08/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 167
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document has been served on all counsel of record via the Court’s ECF system.

/s/ Randall T. Garteiser

Randall T. Garteiser

Case 2:23-cv-00320-JRG-RSP Document 14 Filed 12/08/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 168
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 107 (Friday, June 3, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 33802]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11906]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4496-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]


Massachusetts; Amendment No. 8 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (FEMA-4496-DR), dated March 27, 
2020, and related determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on May 17, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Lori A. 
Ehrlich, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating 
Officer for this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Paul F. Ford as Federal 
Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2022-11906 Filed 6-2-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

PHILLIP WESLEY BASS, §

§

Petitioner, §

§

versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23-CV-209

§

DIRECTOR, TDCJ-ID, §

§

Respondent. §

ORDER ADOPTING THE

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Petitioner Phillip Wesley Bass, proceeding pro se, filed this petition for writ of habeas

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The court previously referred this matter to the Honorable

Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant

to applicable laws and orders of the court. The magistrate judge has submitted a Report and

Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge recommending the petition be dismissed

without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). To date, the parties have

not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation.

The court has received the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge,

along with the record, pleadings, and all available evidence. After careful review, the court finds

that the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Report are correct. 

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation (#4) is ADOPTED. A final judgment will

be entered dismissing the petition.

Signed this date

Apr 16, 2024

Case 9:23-cv-00209-MAC-ZJH Document 6 Filed 04/16/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 19