alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as ofDecember 1, 2017, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES,INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer,LNR PARTNERS, LLC, as Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,as Certificate Administrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asTrustee and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and as AssetRepresentations Reviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates Series 2017-C42 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized termsused herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in theAgreement. 

 

Pursuantto Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice Presidentof Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that: 

 

1.A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period fromDecember 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and 

 

2.To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period. 

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2018. 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

DanielBober 

ExecutiveVice President

WellsFargo Bank 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo)  Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Glendal RHOTON, Petitioner, v. Richard BROWN, Warden.

No. 19-6740.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Gregory Scott ROSS, petitioner, v. KENTUCKY.

No. 17-1528.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Kentucky denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 32 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.32
                                           Agreed to May 8, 2013        

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and thirteen

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF THE CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NATIONAL HONOR GUARD AND PIPE 
              BAND EXHIBITION.

    (a) In General.--The Grand Lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police 
and its auxiliary (in this resolution referred to as the ``sponsor'') 
shall be permitted to sponsor a public event, the National Honor Guard 
and Pipe Band Exhibition (in this resolution referred to as the 
``event''), on the Capitol Grounds, in order to allow law enforcement 
representatives to exhibit their ability to demonstrate Honor Guard 
programs and provide for a bag pipe exhibition.
    (b) Date of Event.--The event shall be held on May 14, 2013, or on 
such other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate jointly designate.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board, the event shall be--
        (1) free of admission charge and open to the public; and
        (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The sponsor shall assume full 
responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all 
activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the 
sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, 
sound amplification devices, and other related structures and 
equipment, as may be required for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, in connection with the event.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
Rodney Jerome WOMACK, Petitioner, v. James ROBERTSON, Warden.

No. 19-7962.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

GABRIEL RAZO-ELIZARRARAS §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23cv254

WARDEN, FCC BEAUMONT MEDIUM §

MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Petitioner Gabriel Razo-Elizarraras, proceeding pro se, brought this petition for writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate

Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. 

The magistrate judge recommends granting the respondent’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative,

motion for summary judgment and dismissing the above-styled petition.

The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available

evidence. A copy of the report and recommendation was mailed to petitioner at the address provided

to the Court. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge

have been filed.

O R D E R

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct

and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case

in accordance with the magistrate judge’s recommendations. 

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 10th day of September, 2024.

Case 1:23-cv-00254-MJT-ZJH Document 15 Filed 09/10/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 209
Craig ROSS, et al., Petitioners v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY.

No. 18-1580

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2296 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2296

To amend the Revised Organic Act of the Virgin Islands to provide that 
the number of members on the legislature of the Virgin Islands and the 
number of such members constituting a quorum shall be determined by the 
          laws of the Virgin Islands, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 22, 1999

 Mrs. Christensen introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                       the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Revised Organic Act of the Virgin Islands to provide that 
the number of members on the legislature of the Virgin Islands and the 
number of such members constituting a quorum shall be determined by the 
          laws of the Virgin Islands, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SIZE AND QUORUM OF LEGISLATURE DETERMINED BY LAWS OF THE 
              VIRGIN ISLANDS.

    (a) Size of Legislature.--Section 5(b) of the Revised Organic Act 
of the Virgin Islands (48 U.S.C. 1571(b)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``fifteen''; and
            (2) by inserting after the first sentence the following: 
        ``The number of such senators shall be determined by the laws 
        of the Virgin Islands.''.
    (b) Number Constituting Quorum.--The first sentence of section 9(a) 
of the Revised Organic Act of the Virgin Islands (48 U.S.C. 1575(a)) is 
amended to read as follows: ``The number of members of the legislature 
needed to constitute a quorum shall be determined by the laws of the 
Virgin Islands.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2017085EN.01000601.xml

| 18.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 85/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 85/6

---

Notice of request concerning the applicability of Article 34 of Directive 2014/25/EU

Request made by a contracting entity

(2017/C 85/05)

On 30 January 2017 the Commission received a request pursuant to Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC (1). The first working day following receipt of the request is 31 January 2017.

1

This request, made by Eneco BV and NV Nuon Energy, concerns retail of electricity and gas in the Netherlands.

Article 34 of Directive 2014/25/EU provides that ‘contracts intended to enable an activity mentioned in Articles 8 to 14 to be carried out shall not be subject to this Directive if the Member State or the contracting entities having introduced the request pursuant to Article 35 can demonstrate that, in the Member State in which it is performed, the activity is directly exposed to competition on markets to which access is not restricted; nor shall design contests that are organised for the pursuit of such an activity in that geographic area be subject to this Directive.’ The assessment of direct exposure to competition that can be carried out in the context of Directive 2014/25/EU is without prejudice to the full-fledged application of competition law.

The Commission is allowed a period of 105 working days to take a decision on this request, commencing on the working day referred to above. The period therefore expires on 6 July 2017.

According to Article 35(5) of Directive 2014/25/EU, further requests concerning retail of electricity and gas in the Netherlands, before the expiry of the period opened in respect of this request, shall not be considered as new procedures and shall be treated in the context of this request.

---

(1)  OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 243.

1

---
Anthony Tyrone BROWN, Petitioner, v. MICHIGAN.

No. 19-6381.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information
extracted from the Balance Sheet, and Statement of
Operations and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                         Jun-30-1997
<CASH>                                38,054,350
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      38,213,237
<PP&E>                                 5,303,174
<DEPRECIATION>                         2,005,778
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        44,275,035
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    927,405
<BONDS>                                  150,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                 124,143
<OTHER-SE>                            43,073,487
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          44,275,035
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       4,161,786
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          7,357,130
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         2,754
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (2,410,972)
<INCOME-TAX>                              23,117
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   (2,434,089)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                          (2,434,089)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
Melanie KELSAY, Petitioner, v. Matt ERNST.

No. 19-682.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                              
<ARTICLE>                                          5
<CIK>                                              0000911503
<NAME>                               SMITH BARNEY DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND L.P.
                                                    
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                                      131,197,341
<SECURITIES>                                                 21,785,278
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   419,385
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            153,402,004
<PP&E>                                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              153,402,004
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         4,870,514
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                                  148,531,490
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                153,402,004
<SALES>                                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             18,372,093
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              6,074,263
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              12,297,830
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 12,297,830
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       121.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         0
        

</TABLE>
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 63 

Honoring the service of Native American Indians in the United States Armed 

Forces. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 30, 2013 

Mrs. KIRKPATRICK (for herself, Mrs. NEGRETE MCLEOD, Ms. NORTON, Mr. 

O’ROURKE, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, Mr. VARGAS, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. COLE, Mr. 

HONDA, Mr. MULLIN, Mr. DENHAM, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. MCCOLLUM, 

Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. RUIZ, Mr. MICHAUD, Mr. COOK, Mr. 

MCINTYRE, Mr. MORAN, Ms. HANABUSA, and Mr. BENISHEK) submitted 

the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Honoring the service of Native American Indians in the 

United States Armed Forces. 

Whereas Native American Indians have served with distinction in the United States Armed Forces and in military 

actions for more than 200 years; 

Whereas the courage, determination, and fighting spirit of 

Native American Indians were strengths recognized and 

valued by American military leaders; 

Whereas more than 150,000 Native American Indians have 

fought for the United States in the struggle for freedom 

and peace, and often in a percentage well above their permstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HCON 63 IH 

centage of the population of the United States as a 

whole; 

Whereas the Elders of the American Indian Society have proclaimed that official recognition of the military service of 

Native American Indians would help engender a sense of 

self-esteem and pride in Native American Indians; 

Whereas, although November 11, Veterans Day, marks a day 

of observance for all veterans who served in the Armed 

Forces, the establishment of a specific National Native 

American Indian Veterans Day would honor the service 

of Native American Indians in the Armed Forces; and 

Whereas November 7, a date during the annual Native American Indian Heritage Month, would be an appropriate 

day to establish as National Native American Indian Veterans Day: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That the House of Representatives— 

3 (1) honors the service of Native American Indi4 ans in the Armed Forces; 

5 (2) recommends the establishment of a National 

6 Native American Indian Veterans Day; 

7 (3) encourages all Americans to learn about the 

8 history of the service of Native American Indians in 

9 the Armed Forces; and 

10 (4) requests the President to issue a proclama11 tion calling on the people of the United States to ob12 serve the day with appropriate ceremonies, activities, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•HCON 63 IH 

1 and programs to demonstrate their support for Na2 tive American Indian veterans. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 44 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.44
                                         Agreed to July 30, 2013        

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and thirteen

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF THE CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR DC SPECIAL 
              OLYMPICS LAW ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN.

    On September 27, 2013, or on such other date as the Speaker of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration 
of the Senate may jointly designate, the 28th Annual District of 
Columbia Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution 
referred to as the ``event'') may be run through the Capitol Grounds to 
carry the Special Olympics torch to honor local Special Olympics 
athletes.

SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

    The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as may be 
necessary to carry out the event.

SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

    The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for physical 
preparations for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, in connection with the event.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
Robert Lee HEARD, Jr., Petitioner, v. LOUISIANA.

No. 18-9821.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 27, 2020

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

*2714Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit for further consideration in light of *Ramos* v. *Louisiana* , 590 U.S. --- (2020). Justice Alito, concurring in the decision to grant, vacate, and remand: In this and in all other case in which the Court grants, vacates, and remands in light of *Ramos* v. *Louisiana* , I concur in the judgment on the understanding that the Court is not deciding or expressing a view on whether the question was properly raised below but is instead leaving that question to be decided on remand.