Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 99 / Monday, May 23, 2022 / Proposed Rules 31193 

Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, 

air traffic service routes, and reporting 

points. 

The Proposal 

The FAA proposes an amendment to 

14 CFR 71 to amend Class D airspace 

and Class E surface airspace, by 

increasing the radius to 4.4 miles 

(previously 4.0 miles), and amending 

the surface extensions. Also, this action 

would remove Class E airspace 

designated as an extension to a Class D 

surface area for Hudson Valley Regional 

Airport (POU), Poughkeepsie, NY, as the 

extensions will be included in the Class 

D description. This action would update 

the airport’s name to Hudson Valley 

Regional Airport (formerly Dutchess 

County Airport), and remove Kingston 

VORTAC from the Class E surface 

airspace description, as well as replace 

Airport/Facility Directory with Chart 

Supplement in the descriptions. In 

addition, the city name would be 

removed from the airport’s header, as 

per FAA Order 7400.2. This action 

would enhance the safety and 

management of controlled airspace 

within the national airspace system. 

Class D and Class E airspace 

designations are published in 

Paragraphs 5000, 6002, and 6004, 

respectively, of FAA Order JO 7400.11F, 

dated August 10, 2021, and effective 

September 15, 2021, which is 

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The Class E airspace designations 

listed in this document will be 

published subsequently in FAA Order 

JO 7400.11. 

FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, is 

published yearly and effective on 

September 15. 

Regulatory Notices and Analyses 

The FAA has determined that this 

proposed regulation only involves an 

established body of technical 

regulations for which frequent and 

routine amendments are necessary to 

keep them operationally current. It, 

therefore, (1) is not a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action’’ under Executive 

Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant 

rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies 

and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 

26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant 

preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation 

as the anticipated impact is so minimal. 

Since this is a routine matter that will 

only affect air traffic procedures and air 

navigation, it is certified that this 

proposed rule, when promulgated, will 

not have a significant economic impact 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

Environmental Review 

This proposal would be subject to an 

environmental analysis in accordance 

with FAA Order 1050.1F, 

‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and 

Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final 

regulatory action. 

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

The Proposed Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as 

follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 

40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 

1959–1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation 

Administration Order JO 7400.11F, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated August 10, 2021, and 

effective September 15, 2021, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace. 

* * * * * 

AEA NY D Poughkeepsie, NY [Amended] 

Hudson Valley Regional Airport, NY 

(Lat. 41°37′36′′ N, long. 73°53′03′′ W) 

That airspace extending upward from the 

surface to and including 2,700 feet MSL 

within a 4.4-mile radius of Hudson Valley 

Regional Airport (POU), and within 1.8 miles 

each side of the 051° bearing of the airport, 

extending from the 4.4-mile radius to 6.2 

miles northeast of the airport, and within 1.0- 

miles each side of the 231° bearing of the 

airport, extending from the 4.4-mile radius to 

6.2-miles southwest of the airport. This Class 

D airspace area is effective during the 

specific dates and times established in 

advance by a Notice to Air Missions. The 

effective date and time will thereafter be 

continuously published in the Chart 

Supplement. 

Paragraph 6002 Class E Surface Airspace. 

* * * * * 

AEA NY E2 Poughkeepsie, NY [Amended] 

Hudson Valley Regional Airport, NY 

(Lat. 41°37′36′′ N, long. 73°53′03′′ W) 

That airspace extending upward from the 

surface within a 4.4-mile radius of Hudson 

Valley Regional Airport, and within 1.8 miles 

each side of the 051° bearing of the airport, 

extending from the 4.4-mile radius to 6.2 

miles northeast of the airport, and within 1.0- 

miles each side of the 231° bearing of the 

airport, extending from the 4.4-mile radius to 

6.2-miles southwest of the airport. This Class 

E airspace is effective during the specific 

dates and times established in advance by a 

Notice to Air Missions. The effective date 

and time will thereafter be continuously 

published in the Chart Supplement. 

Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace 

Designated as an Extension to Class D or E 

Surface Area. 

* * * * * 

AEA NY E4 Poughkeepsie, NY [Removed] 

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on May 16, 

2022. 

Andreese C. Davis, 

Manager, Airspace & Procedures Team South, 

Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic 

Organization. 

[FR Doc. 2022–10839 Filed 5–20–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2022–0432; Airspace 

Docket No. 22–ASO–5] 

RIN 2120–AA66 

Proposed Amendment of Class E 

Airspace; Greenwood, SC 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: This action proposes to 

amend Class E airspace extending 

upward from 700 feet above the surface 

at Greenwood County Airport (GRD) 

Greenwood, SC, due to the 

decommissioning of the Coronaca nondirectional beacon (NDB) and 

cancellation of associated approaches, 

as well as updating the airport’s 

geographic coordinates. Controlled 

airspace is necessary for the safety and 

management of instrument flight rules 

(IFR) operations in the area. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before July 7, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this 

proposal to: The U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building 

Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 

Washington, DC 20590–0001; 

Telephone: (800) 647–5527, or (202) 

366–9826. You must identify the Docket 

No. FAA–2022–0432; Airspace Docket 

No. 22–ASO–5 at the beginning of your 

comments. You may also submit 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
31194 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 99 / Monday, May 23, 2022 / Proposed Rules 

comments through the internet at 

https://www.regulations.gov. 

FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, and 

subsequent amendments can be viewed 

online at https://www.faa.gov/air_

traffic/publications/. For further 

information, you can contact the 

Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 800 Independence 

Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; 

Telephone: (202) 267–8783. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Fornito, Operations Support Group, 

Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 1701 Columbia Avenue, 

College Park, GA 30337; Telephone 

(404) 305–6364. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the United States Code. 

Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the 

authority of the FAA Administrator. 

Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 

describes in more detail the scope of the 

agency’s authority. This rulemaking is 

promulgated under the authority 

described in Subtitle VII, Part A, 

Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that 

section, the FAA is charged with 

prescribing regulations to assign the use 

of airspace necessary to ensure the 

safety of aircraft and the efficient use of 

airspace. This regulation is within the 

scope of that authority, as it would 

amend airspace in Greenwood, SC, to 

support IFR operations in the area. 

Comments Invited 

Interested persons are invited to 

comment on this proposed rulemaking 

by submitting such written data, views, 

or arguments, as they may desire. 

Comments that provide the factual basis 

supporting the views and suggestions 

presented are particularly helpful in 

developing reasoned regulatory 

decisions on the proposal. Comments 

are specifically invited on the overall 

regulatory, aeronautical, economic, 

environmental, and energy-related 

aspects of the proposal. 

Communications should identify both 

docket numbers (Docket No. FAA– 

2021–0432 and Airspace Docket No. 22– 

ASO–5) and be submitted in triplicate to 

DOT Docket Operations (see ADDRESSES

section for the address and phone 

number). You may also submit 

comments through the internet at 

https://www.regulations.gov. 

Persons wishing the FAA to 

acknowledge receipt of their comments 

on this action must submit with those 

comments a self-addressed stamped 

postcard on which the following 

statement is made: ‘‘Comments to FAA 

Docket No. FAA–2021–0432; Airspace 

Docket No. 22–ASO–5.’’ The postcard 

will be date/time stamped and returned 

to the commenter. 

All communications received before 

the specified closing date for comments 

will be considered before taking action 

on the proposed rule. The proposal 

contained in this document may be 

changed in light of the comments 

received. All comments submitted will 

be available for examination in the 

public docket both before and after the 

comment closing date. A report 

summarizing each substantive public 

contact with FAA personnel concerned 

with this rulemaking will be filed in the 

docket. 

Availability of NPRMs 

An electronic copy of this document 

may be downloaded through the 

internet at https://www.regulations.gov. 

Recently published rulemaking 

documents can also be accessed through 

the FAA’s web page at https://

www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/ 

airspace_amendments/. 

You may review the public docket 

containing the proposal, any comments 

received and any final disposition in 

person in the Dockets Office (see the 

ADDRESSES section for address and 

phone number) between 9:00 a.m. and 

5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except federal holidays. An informal 

docket may also be examined between 

8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, except federal holidays, 

at the office of the Eastern Service 

Center, Federal Aviation 

Administration, Room 350,1701 

Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 

30337. 

Availability and Summary of 

Documents for Incorporation by 

Reference 

This document proposes to amend 

FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, 

dated August 10, 2021, and effective 

September 15, 2021. FAA Order JO 

7400.11F is publicly available as listed 

in the ADDRESSES section of this 

document. FAA Order JO 7400.11F lists 

Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, 

air traffic service routes, and reporting 

points. 

The Proposal 

The FAA proposes an amendment to 

14 CFR part 71 to amend Class E 

airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface at Greenwood 

County Airport (GRD), Greenwood, SC, 

due to the decommissioning of the 

Coronaca NDB and cancellation of 

associated approaches. This action 

would eliminate the east extension and 

create an extension to the west. This 

action would also update the airport’s 

geographic coordinates to coincide with 

the FAA’s database. 

Class E airspace designations are 

published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA 

Order JO 7400.11F, dated August 10, 

2021, and effective September 15, 2021, 

which is incorporated by reference in 14 

CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace 

designations listed in this document 

will be published subsequently in FAA 

Order JO 7400.11. 

FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, is 

published yearly and effective on 

September 15. 

Regulatory Notices and Analyses 

The FAA has determined that this 

proposed regulation only involves an 

established body of technical 

regulations for which frequent and 

routine amendments are necessary to 

keep them operationally current. It, 

therefore: (1) Is not a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action’’ under Executive 

Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant 

rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies 

and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 

26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant 

preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation 

as the anticipated impact is so minimal. 

Since this is a routine matter that will 

only affect air traffic procedures and air 

navigation, it is certified that this 

proposed rule, when promulgated, will 

not have a significant economic impact 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

Environmental Review 

This proposal will be subject to an 

environmental analysis in accordance 

with FAA Order 1050.1F, 

‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and 

Procedures,’’ prior to any FAA final 

regulatory action. 

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

The Proposed Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as 

follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 71 

continues to read as follows: 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 99 / Monday, May 23, 2022 / Proposed Rules 31195 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 

40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 

1959–1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation 

Administration Order JO 7400.11F, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated August 10, 2021, and 

effective September 15, 2021, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas 

Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More 

Above the Surface of the Earth. 

* * * * * 

ASO SC E5 Greenwood, SC [Amended] 

Greenwood County Airport, SC 

(Lat. 34°15′01′′ N, long. 82°9′28′′ W) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 7-mile radius 

of Greenwood County Airport, and within 2- 

miles each side of the 265° bearing of the 

airport extending to 9.1-miles west of the 

airport. 

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on May 16, 

2022. 

Andreese C. Davis, 

Manager, Airspace & Procedures Team South, 

Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic 

Organization. 

[FR Doc. 2022–10838 Filed 5–20–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

15 CFR Parts 740, 742 and 774 

[Docket No. 220516–0114] 

RIN 0694–AI21 

Commerce Control List: Controls on 

Certain Marine Toxins 

AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and 

Security, Commerce. 

ACTION: Proposed rule; request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Industry and 

Security (BIS), Department of 

Commerce, maintains controls on the 

export, reexport and transfer (incountry) of dual-use items and less 

sensitive military items through the 

Export Administration Regulations 

(EAR), including the Commerce Control 

List (CCL). This rule proposes new 

unilateral export controls on four 

naturally occurring, dual-use biological 

toxins (specifically, the marine toxins 

brevetoxin, gonyautoxin, nodularin and 

palytoxin), the synthesis and collection 

of which BIS has identified for 

evaluation according to the criteria in 

Section 1758 of the Export Control 

Reform Act of 2018 (ECRA) pertaining 

to emerging and foundational 

technologies. These toxins have the 

potential (through either accidental or 

deliberate release) to cause casualties in 

humans or animals, degrade equipment, 

or damage crops or the environment. As 

these toxins are now capable of being 

more easily isolated and purified due to 

novel synthesis methods and 

equipment, the absence of export 

controls on such toxins could be 

exploited for biological weapons 

purposes. To address this concern, BIS 

proposes to amend the CCL by adding 

these toxins to Export Control 

Classification Number (ECCN) 1C351. 

This rule also proposes several 

conforming changes to the EAR to 

reflect the proposed addition of these 

marine toxins to ECCN 1C351. In 

addition, this document requests public 

comments to ensure that the scope of 

these proposed controls will be effective 

and appropriate (with respect to their 

potential impact on legitimate 

commercial or scientific applications). 

DATES: Comments must be received by 

BIS no later than June 22, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by docket number BIS–2022– 

0013 or RIN 0694–AI21, through any of 

the following: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

You can find this proposed rule by 

searching for its regulations.gov docket 

number, which is BIS–2022–0013. 

• Email: PublicComments@

bis.doc.gov. Include RIN 0694–AI21 in 

the subject line of the message. 

All filers using the portal or email 

should use the name of the person or 

entity submitting the comments as the 

name of their files, in accordance with 

the instructions below. Anyone 

submitting business confidential 

information should clearly identify the 

business confidential portion at the time 

of submission, file a statement justifying 

nondisclosure and referring to the 

specific legal authority claimed, and 

provide a non-confidential submission. 

For comments submitted 

electronically containing business 

confidential information, the file name 

of the business confidential version 

should begin with the characters ‘‘BC.’’ 

Any page containing business 

confidential information must be clearly 

marked ‘‘BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL’’ 

on the top of that page. The 

corresponding non-confidential version 

of those comments must be clearly 

marked ‘‘PUBLIC.’’ The file name of the 

non-confidential version should begin 

with the character ‘‘P.’’ The ‘‘BC’’ and 

‘‘P’’ should be followed by the name of 

the person or entity submitting the 

comments. Any submissions with file 

names that do not begin with a ‘‘P’’ or 

‘‘BC’’ will be assumed to be public and 

will be made publicly available through 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

questions on the chemical and 

biological (CB) controls that would 

apply to the marine toxins proposed for 

control under ECCN 1C351, contact Dr. 

Tara Gonzalez, Chemical and Biological 

Controls Division, Office of 

Nonproliferation and Treaty 

Compliance, Bureau of Industry and 

Security, Telephone: (202) 482–3343, 

Email: Tara.Gonzalez@bis.doc.gov. For 

questions on the submission of 

comments, contact Willard Fisher, 

Regulatory Policy Division, Office of 

Exporter Services, Bureau of Industry 

and Security, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, (202) 482–6057, Email: 

RPD2@bis.doc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Identification of Section 1758 

Technologies 

As part of the National Defense 

Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal 

Year 2019, Public Law 115–232, 

Congress enacted the Export Control 

Reform Act of 2018 (ECRA), 50 U.S.C. 

4801–4852. Section 1758 of ECRA (as 

codified under 50 U.S.C. 4817) 

authorizes the Bureau of Industry and 

Security (BIS) to establish appropriate 

controls on the export, reexport or 

transfer (in-country) of emerging and 

foundational technologies that are 

essential to the national security of the 

United States. 

Neither Section 1758 nor any other 

section of ECRA defines the terms 

‘‘emerging technology’’ or ‘‘foundational 

technology.’’ Further, ECRA does not 

provide guidance on how to 

differentiate between ‘‘emerging 

technology’’ and ‘‘foundational 

technology.’’ Since ECRA’s enactment, 

BIS has solicited public comment on 

these two terms with the idea that 

defining the terms would assist in the 

identification of the technologies. To 

that end, BIS published numerous rules 

adding technologies to the CCL 

pursuant to Section 1758 without 

defining either term. Notably, pursuant 

to Section 1758, on November 19, 2018, 

BIS published an advance notice of 

proposed rulemaking, ‘‘Review of 

Controls for Certain Emerging 

Technologies’’ (83 FR 58201) (November 

19 ANPRM). The November 19 ANPRM 

identified biotechnology in a 

representative list of fourteen 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1