alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.3

(FRONT)

INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS
OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

The viaLink Company

Series D Convertible
Preferred Stock

         THIS CERTIFIES THAT _______ is the registered holder of _______ (____)
fully paid and non-assessable shares of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock,
$0.001 par value, of The viaLink Company, transferable only on the books of the
Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized Attorney upon
surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this
Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers and to be sealed with
the Seal of the Corporation as of this 30th day of September, 2002.

-----------------------------------         ------------------------------------
Vice President                                               Assistant Secretary
$0.001
par value

(BACK)

-----
The viaLink Company

-----

Series D

--------

September 30, 2002

THESE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE (THE "SECURITIES") HAVE NOT
BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE "SECURITIES
ACT") OR ANY STATE SECURITIES LAWS AND MAY NOT BE SOLD, TRANSFERRED OR OTHERWISE
DISPOSED OF UNLESS REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT AND UNDER APPLICABLE
STATE SECURITIES LAWS OR THE VIALINK COMPANY SHALL HAVE RECEIVED AN OPINION OF
ITS COUNSEL THAT REGISTRATION OF SUCH SECURITIES UNDER THE SECURITIES AND UNDER
THE PROVISIONS OF APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS IS NOT REQUIRED.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER PARTNERS II LLC, 

Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant,

v.

T-MOBILE USA, INC. AND SPRINT LLC, 

Defendants and Counterclaimant-Plaintiffs.

Case No. 2:24-cv-00015-JRG-RSP

(LEAD CASE)

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

HEADWATER PARTNERS II LLC, 

Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant,

v.

AT&T SERVICES, INC., AT&T MOBILITY 

LLC AND AT&T CORP., 

Defendants and Counterclaimant-Plaintiffs.

Case No. 2:24-cv-00016-JRG-RSP

(MEMBER CASE TO 2:24-cv-00015-JRGRSP)

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

PROPOSED DISCOVERY ORDER AND PROTECTIVE ORDER

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Headwater Partners II LLC (“Headwater”) and 

Defendants T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Sprint LLC (collectively, “T-Mobile”) and AT&T Services, 

Inc., AT&T Mobility, LLC and AT&T Corp. (collectively, “AT&T”) (all together, the “Parties”), 

Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Proposed Discovery Order and Protective Order. The 

Court, having considered the joint motion, and for good cause shown, finds that the motion should 

be GRANTED.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for filing the proposed discovery order and 

protective order is extended to April 25, 2024. All other deadlines shall remain in place absent 

Case 2:24-cv-00015-JRG-RSP Document 44-1 Filed 04/15/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 368
2

further leave of Court.

Case 2:24-cv-00015-JRG-RSP Document 44-1 Filed 04/15/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 369
David GREEN, Jr., Petitioner, v. William P. BARR, Attorney General, et al.

No. 19-5621

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Praveen Kevin KHURANA, Petitioner, v. IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND WELFARE.

No. 19-7263.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Idaho denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 82 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 82

         To provide sufficient time for legislation to be read.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 1, 2011

Mr. Paul submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                 Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
         To provide sufficient time for legislation to be read.

    Resolved, That (a) it shall not be in order for the Senate to 
consider any bill, resolution, message, conference report, amendment, 
treaty, or any other measure or matter until 1 session day has passed 
since introduction for every 20 pages included in the measure or matter 
in the usual form plus 1 session day for any number of remaining pages 
less than 20 in the usual form.
    (b)(1) Any Senator may raise a point of order that any bill, 
resolution, message, conference report, amendment, treaty, or any other 
measure or matter is not in order under subsection (a). No motion to 
table the point of order shall be in order.
    (2) Any Senator may move to waive a point of order raised under 
paragraph (1) by an affirmative yea and nay vote of two-thirds of the 
Senators duly chosen and sworn. All motions to waive under this 
subparagraph shall be debatable collectively for not to exceed 3 hours 
equally divided between the Senator raising the point for order and the 
Senator moving to waive the point of order or their designees. A motion 
to waive the point of order shall not be amendable.
    (3) This resolution is enacted pursuant to the power granted to 
each House of Congress to determine the Rules of its Proceedings in 
clause 2 of section 5 of Article I of the Constitution of the United 
States.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 11.1

              Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings
                (In millions, except share and per share amounts)

                                                         Quarter Ended March 31,
                                                         -----------------------
                                                           1999          1998
                                                         --------      --------
Net income                                               $   35.0      $   23.5

Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during each year - basic                         94.0          81.7

Weighted average number of common shares
and common stock equivalents outstanding during
each year - diluted                                          96.4          84.7
                                                         --------      --------

Basic earnings per share                                 $   0.37      $   0.29
                                                         ========      ========

Diluted earnings per share                               $   0.36      $   0.28
                                                         ========      ========
Jeffrey R. GOLIN, et ux., Petitioners, v. SAN ANDREAS REGIONAL CENTER, et al.

No. 19-7452.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District denied.
Exhibit 10.3

 

COMPENSATORY ARRANGEMENTS OF DIRECTORS

 

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of SuperMedia Inc. approved non-management director compensation, effective as of February 16, 2012, as follows:

 

	
Service(1)
    	
 
    	
Fee Amount ($)
    	
 
    
	
Annual Chairman of the Board Fee 
    	
 
    	
109,500
    	
 
    
	
Annual Vice Chairman of the Board Fee 
    	
 
    	
10,000
    	
 
    
	
Annual Audit Committee Chairman Fee 
    	
 
    	
20,000
    	
 
    
	
Annual Compensation Committee Chairman Fee 
    	
 
    	
20,000
    	
 
    
	
Annual Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chairman Fee 
    	
 
    	
10,000
    	
 
    
	
Per Board Meeting Fee(2) 
    	
 
    	
2,000
    	
 
    
	
Per Board Committee Meeting Fee 
    	
 
    	
2,000
    	
 
    



 






(1)           The annual cash retainer for board service is $70,000. The table above shows director fees payable in addition to the annual retainer.

 

(2)           Board meeting fees are paid only for meetings in addition to the regularly scheduled Board meetings.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet, and Income Statement and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                      SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             44,658,397
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   45,038,559
<PP&E>                                              3,842,198
<DEPRECIATION>                                      1,235,930
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     48,264,714
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               1,667,159
<BONDS>                                                19,572
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                              122,006
<OTHER-SE>                                         46,455,977
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       48,264,714
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    4,875,002
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       7,014,213
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    104,847
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (975,254)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           23,580
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (998,834)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (998,834)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.10)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7082

JUDSON WARREN WHITE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusFRED MARSHALL, Chief of Police; BRAD RHINEHART, Officer; ERROLL RANDLE, Officer; CITY OF CHARLESTON, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-213-2) Submitted: January 5, 1999 Decided: January 21, 1999 Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Judson Warren White, Appellant Pro Se. John R. Teare, Jr., BOWLES, RICE, MCDAVID, GRAFF & LOVE, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Judson Warren White appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint and denying his motion for clarification. We have reviewed the record and thedistrict court’s opinions accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendations and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See White v. Rhinehart , No. CA-97-213-2 (S.D.W. Va. June 9, July 28 & Aug. 1, 1997). We deny White’s motions for appointment of counsel and for leave to file additional exhibits as evidence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                              FOR THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,  FOR NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
                                   1999             1998                   1999            1998
                              -------------      -----------            -----------      -----------
<S>                            <C>               <C>                    <C>              <C>
Basic:

Net income .................    $ 7,620,171      $14,512,148            $17,464,911      $42,822,654
                                ===========      ===========            ===========      ===========

Weighted average number of
shares of common stock
outstanding ................     53,762,676       53,534,207             53,134,457       52,088,524

Net income per common
 share .....................    $      0.14      $      0.27            $      0.33      $      0.82
                                ===========      ===========            ===========      ===========


Diluted:

Net income .................    $ 7,620,171      $14,512,148            $17,464,911      $42,822,654
                                ===========      ===========            ===========      ===========

Weighted average number of
shares of common stock
outstanding ................     53,762,676       53,534,207             53,134,457       52,088,524

Net effect of dilutive
stock options--based on
the treasury stock method
using average market price..      2,402,299        6,994,143              3,459,591        8,363,235
                                -----------      -----------            -----------      -----------

Total weighted average
number of shares of common
stock and common stock
equivalents outstanding ....     56,164,975       60,528,350             56,594,048       60,451,759
                                ===========      ===========            ===========      ===========

Net income per common
 share .....................    $      0.14      $      0.24            $      0.31      $      0.71
                                ===========      ===========            ===========      ===========

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.a

I, John P. Manning, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund V L.P.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|February 14, 2008 | /s/ John P. Manning
|----------------- | -------------------
|                  | John P. Manning    
|                  | Principal          
|                  | Executive Officer  
|                  |                    
|                  |
Willis J. YAZZIE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8291.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Rubin R. WEEKS, Petitioner v. Jason LEWIS, Warden

No. 19-5519

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and the petition *336for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Report of
Independent Accountants

To the Shareholders and Board
 of Directors of
Salomon Brothers Variable
Series Funds Inc

In planning and performing
 our audit of the financial
statements of Salomon Brothers
Variable Investors Fund and
Salomon Brothers Variable
Small Cap Growth Fund
(two of the portfolios constituting
Salomon Brothers Variable Series
Funds Inc, hereafter referred to as
the "Fund")  for the year ended
December 31, 2001, we considered
its internal control, including
control activities for safeguarding
securities, in order to determine
our auditing procedures for the
purpose of expressing our opinion
on the financial statements and to
comply with the requirements of
Form N-SAR, not to provide
assurance on internal control.

The management of the Fund
is responsible for establishing
and maintaining internal control.
In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by
management are required to assess
the expected benefits and related
costs of controls.  Generally, controls
that are relevant to an audit
pertain to the entity's objective of
preparing financial statements
for external purposes that are
fairly presented in conformity
with generally accepted
accounting principles.  Those
controls include the safeguarding
of assets against unauthorized
acquisition, use or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations
in internal control, errors or fraud
may occur and not be detected.
Also, projection of any evaluation
of internal control to future periods
is subject to the risk that controls
may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions or that the
effectiveness of the design and
operation may deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal
control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in internal
control that might be material
weaknesses under standards
established by the American
Institute of Certified Public
Accountants.  A material
weakness is a condition in
which the design or operation
of one or more of the internal
control components does not
reduce to a relatively low level the
risk that misstatements caused by
error or fraud in amounts that
would be material in relation to
the financial statements being
audited may occur and not be
detected within a timely period
by employees in the normal course
of performing their assigned
functions.  However, we noted no
matters involving internal control
and its operation, including controls
for safeguarding securities, that we
consider to be material weaknesses
as defined above as of
December 31, 2001.

This report is intended solely
for the information and use of
management and the Board of
Directors of the Fund and the
Securities and Exchange
Commission and is not intended
to be and should not be used by
anyone other than these specified parties.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

February 11, 2002

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Salomon Brothers Variable Series Funds Inc


	(3)
# C_2018027EN.01000201.xml

| 25.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/2

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case M.8394 — Essilor/Luxottica)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 27/03)

On 26 September 2017, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the abovementioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the internal market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

1

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.8394 — Essilor/Luxottica, to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---