alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM STARBASE
CORPORATION'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         5,579
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     75
<ALLOWANCES>                                      18
<INVENTORY>                                       23
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,962
<PP&E>                                         1,178
<DEPRECIATION>                                   599
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6,624
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            681
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        1
<COMMON>                                         132
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,810
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6,624
<SALES>                                          149
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 381
<CGS>                                             28
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     28
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3,042
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   8
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 4
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (2,576)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (2,577)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (2,577)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.22)
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies, to
the best of his knowledge, that this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ACT Teleconferencing, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003.



Date: April 15, 2005



By:

/s/    Gene WarrenGene Warren Chief Executive Officer
Enrique LOPEZ QUINTERO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8385.

Supreme Court of the United States.

June 1, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      15,528,215
<SECURITIES>                                19,258,789
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,558,509
<ALLOWANCES>                                   486,820
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            38,724,233
<PP&E>                                     137,681,591
<DEPRECIATION>                              27,582,575
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             317,587,198
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,844,187
<BONDS>                                    317,529,032
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       169,101
<OTHER-SE>                                 119,772,011
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               317,587,198
<SALES>                                     34,580,464
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            34,580,464
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               87,457,457
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            (4,266,028)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               486,820
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          41,828,876
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (90,439,841)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (1,300,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (89,139,841)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (89,139,841)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (5.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (5.26)


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 28, 2010 

p0621 

Order 

 

June 28, 2010 

140935 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140935 

 COA: 295775 

Branch CC: 06-038482-FC 

ANTHONY LUIS PRITCHETT, JR., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 23, 2010 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit C

Case 2:24-cv-00021-JRG Document 54-4 Filed 07/18/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 3116
Delaware.gov Governor | General Assembly | Courts | Elected Officials | State Agencies

Department of State: Division of Corporations

Allowable Characters

HOME Entity Details

THIS IS NOT A STATEMENT OF GOOD STANDING

File Number: 3030729 Incorporation Date /

Formation Date:

6/9/2020

(mm/dd/yyyy)

Entity Name: NEW PP LICENSING LLC

Entity Kind:

Limited

Liability

Company

Entity Type: General

Residency: Domestic State: DELAWARE

REGISTERED AGENT INFORMATION

Name: THE CORPORATION TRUST COMPANY

Address: CORPORATION TRUST CENTER 1209 ORANGE ST

City: WILMINGTON County: New Castle

State: DE Postal Code: 19801

Phone: 302-658-7581

Additional Information is available for a fee. You can retrieve Status for a fee of $10.00 or

more detailed information including current franchise tax assessment, current filing history

and more for a fee of $20.00.

Would you like Status Status,Tax & History Information

Submit

View Search Results New Entity Search

For help on a particular field click on the Field Tag to take you to the help area.

site map | privacy | about this site | contact us | translate | delaware.gov

6/18/24, 11:13 PM Division of Corporations - Filing

https://icis.corp.delaware.gov/Ecorp/EntitySearch/NameSearch.aspx 1/1

Case 2:24-cv-00021-JRG Document 54-4 Filed 07/18/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 3117
Paul Eugene LAWSON, Petitioner v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, et al.

No. 18-9640

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

### **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS REQUIRED BY**

# **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

# ** **

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof Steinway Musical Instruments, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dennis M. Hanson, Senior Executive VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that to the bestof my knowledge:

 

1. The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|                 |   | /s/ Dennis  M. Hanson                |
|----------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|                 |   |                                 |
|                 |   | Senior  Executive Vice President and |
|                 |   | Chief  Financial Officer             |
|                 |   | (Principal  Financial Officer)       |
|                 |   |                                 |
|                 |   |                                 |
| August 8,  2008 |   |                                 |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPERSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PERSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SteinwayMusical Instruments, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Dennis M. Hanson, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
|   |                                |
|--------|-------------------------------------|
|   | /s/ Dennis M. Hanson                |   |
|   | Senior Executive Vice President and |
|   | Chief Financial Officer             |
|   | (Principal Financial Officer)       |

 

 

November 4, 2004

 

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Steinway Musical Instruments, Inc. and willbe retained by Steinway Musical Instruments, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Case 2:24-cv-00007-JRG-RSP Document 18 Filed 01/26/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 254
Inocente RODRIGUEZ-JUAREZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7833.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

OPTIMUM IMAGING TECHNOLOGIES

LLC,

 Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,

Defendant.

Civil Action No. 4:23-CV-00927-ALM

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE JOINT 

REPORT

Before the Court is Defendants Sony Corporation, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Nikon 

Corporation and FUJIFILM Corporation (collectively, the “Defendants”) and Optimum Imaging 

Technologies, LLC’s (“OIT”) (collectively, “The Parties”) joint motion to extend the deadline to 

file a Joint Report (the “Motion”). After due consideration, the Court finds that the Motion should 

be and is hereby GRANTED. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline to file the Joint Report is extended from 

September 5, 2024 to September 10, 2024.

SO ORDERED.

Case 4:23-cv-00927-ALM Document 35-1 Filed 09/03/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 136
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

GHAITH ALAGELE (2)

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NUMBER 4:24-CR-00025

ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY

The Court referred this matter to the United States Magistrate Judge for administration of 

a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a 

hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court accept 

Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on Count Two of the Indictment.

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings.

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of 

the United States Magistrate Judge. The court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance 

of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report.

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Ghaith Alagele

GUILTY of Count Two of the Indictment, charging a violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 932(b)(2) –

Straw Purchase of Firearms.

Case 4:24-cr-00025-ALM-AGD Document 73 Filed 12/02/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:

264
Case 4:24-cr-00025-ALM-AGD Document 73 Filed 12/02/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:

265
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 14 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 14

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF ROTUNDA FOR HOLOCAUST DAYS OF REMEMBRANCE CEREMONY.

    The rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used on April 11, 
2013, for a ceremony as part of the commemoration of the days of 
remembrance of victims of the

              

 Holocaust. Physical preparations for the ceremony shall be carried out 
in accordance with such conditions as the Architect of the Capitol may 
prescribe.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 6, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 14

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony as part 
   of the commemoration of the days of remembrance of victims of the 
                               Holocaust.
```
Guillermo GARCIA, Petitioner, v. B.A. LACEY, et al.

No. 19-7766.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District denied.
**EXHIBIT 10.12**



**Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan**

On August 4, 2005, the Executive Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
approved and implemented the following long-term incentive ("LTI") compensation structure for key
executives:

PLAN NAME:

Associated Estates Realty Corporation Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan.****

**OBJECTIVE:**

To motivate and reward executives for the achievement of certain milestones linked to
the strategic plan.

**TIMING:**

Grants will be delivered annually and each annual grant is tied to a three-year strategic
benchmark that will be determined by the Executive Compensation Committee at the first
meeting of each calendar year.

Performance against benchmark will be measured at the conclusion of each calendar
year and approved at the first Executive Compensation Committee meeting of the year.

**PLAN PARAMETERS AND PARTICIPANTS:**

Target LTI awards will be established for each participant based on the mix of total
compensation.

Threshold award levels are set at 25% of the total LTI target opportunity.

Awards are delivered through a mix of non-qualified stock options ("NQSOs") and/or
stock settled appreciation rights ("SARs") and Performance-Contingent Restricted
Shares.

NQSOs/SARs vest in equal, annual installments over the three-year period.

The restricted share grant may be accelerated up to the threshold level at the end
of each measurement period based on the achievement of strategic objectives.

If the overall three-year objective is met, the participants are eligible for the
remaining 50% of the restricted share grant.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUFKIN DIVISION

DALTON GRANT MILLER §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:24cv29

STATE OF TEXAS, ET AL., §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Dalton Grant Miller, an inmate confined at the Shelby County Jail, proceeding pro

se, filed this civil rights lawsuit against the State of Texas, Kevin W. Windham, John Price, Karen

Price and Jeffery Adams. This matter was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636 and the Amended Order for the Adoption of Local Rules for the Assignment of

Duties to the United States Magistrate Judge for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and

recommendations for the disposition of the case.

Discussion

Plaintiff previously filed a substantially identical lawsuit that has been assigned civil action

number 9:24cv9. The prior lawsuit remains pending before this court. As a result, the above-styled

lawsuit should be dismissed without prejudice as repetitious.

Recommendation

This civil rights lawsuit should be dismissed without prejudice as repetitious.

Objections

Within 14 days after receipt of the magistrate judge’s report, any party may serve and file

written objections to the findings of facts, conclusions of law and recommendations of the magistrate

judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C).

Failure to timely file written objections to the proposed findings of facts, conclusions of law

and recommendations contained within this report within 14 days after service shall bar an aggrieved

party from entitlement to de novo review by the district court of the proposed findings, conclusions

and recommendations and from appellate review of factual findings and legal conclusions accepted

Case 9:24-cv-00029-MAC-ZJH Document 2 Filed 02/26/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 14
by the district court except on grounds of plain error. Douglass v. United Services Automobile

Association, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. CIV. P.

72.

2

_________________________

Zack Hawthorn

United States Magistrate Judge SIGNED this 26th day of February, 2024.

Case 9:24-cv-00029-MAC-ZJH Document 2 Filed 02/26/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 15
UAET (02-2008)

Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint

Attach this form to the Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint event.

CASE AND DEADLINE INFORMATION

Civil Action No.:

Name of party requesting extension:

Is this the first application for extension of time in this case? Yes

No

If no, please indicate which application this represents: Second

Third

Other ___________

Date of Service of Summons:

Number of days requested: 30 days

15 days

Other _____ days

New Deadline Date: (Required)

ATTORNEY FILING APPLICATION INFORMATION

Full Name:

State Bar No.:

Firm Name:

Address:

Phone:

Fax:

Email:

A certificate of conference does not need to be filed with this unopposed application.

2:23-cv-00617

✔

01/09/2024

✔ 21

04/25/2024

Matthew C. Acosta

24062577

Platt Richmond PLLC

1201 N Riverfront Blvd.

Suite 150

Dallas, Texas 75207

214-559-2700

214-559-

macosta@plattrichmond.com

Captana GMBH, SES-imagotag GmbH, and SES-imagota SA

Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 24 Filed 04/04/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 339
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, John F. Short, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Opinion Research Corporation, certifythat:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Opinion Research Corporation; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and
 

 

 b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     Date:May 16, 2005 Signed: /s/ John F. Short     Name:      John F. Short Title:      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
IN RE Arthur LOPEZ, Petitioner.

No. 19-7230.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.