alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 09-1495

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Orlando Harris, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: June 26, 2009 Filed: July 8, 2009

___________ Before RILEY, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. In 2006, Orlando Harris was sentenced to 12 months and 1 day in prison and 5 years of supervised releas e for bank fraud, a Class B felony. The district court 1 subsequently revoked his supervised re lease and sentenced him to additional imprisonment and supervised release. Wh ile Harris was serving his second term of supervised release, he violated conditions requiring him to file monthly reports with the probation officer, maintain lawful employment, timely notify the probation officer of changes in employment and residence, participate in substance-abuse counseling-2- and testing, and make restitution payments. The district court again revoked supervised release, this time sentencing Harris to 10 months in prison and 36 months of supervised release. Harris appeals, ar guing that his violations were not egregious enough to warrant his sentence, and that hi s sentence is therefore unreasonable and greater than necessary to accomp lish statutory sentencing goals.

We conclude that the revocati on sentence is not unreasonable. See United States v. Tyson , 413 F.3d 824, 825 (8th Cir. 2005) (percuriam) (standard of review). First, the court sentenced Harris within the statutory limits. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(b)(1) (authorized maximum term of supervised release for Class B felony is 5 years), (e)(3) (upon revocation, maximum time defendant may be required to serve in prison is 3 years if offense that resulted in term of supervised release is Class B felony), (h) (revocation sentence may include additional supervised release term not exceeding term of supervised release author ized by statute for offense that resulted in original supervised release, less any pr ison term imposed upon revocation). Second, the court sentenced him within the advisory Guidelines range, after listening to the arguments of counsel, reviewing Harris’s supervision experiences, and expressly considering relevant matters under 18 U.S .C. § 3583(e)(3) (permitting revocation of supervised release and re-imprisonment, afte r consideration of specified factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)). See United States v. Franklin , 397 F.3d 604, 606-07 (8th Cir. 2005) (all that is required is evidence that court considered relevant matters, not that court made specific findings on each § 3553(a) factor).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
# C_2017400EN.01000901.xml

| 24.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 400/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 400/9

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty)

(2017/C 400/02)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 29.09.2017 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.47863 (2017/N) |
| Member State | Italy |
| Region | TOSCANA | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Riconoscimento alle aziende zootecniche dei danni da predazione provocati da lupo (Canis lupus L.) |
| Legal basis | Delibera di Giunta Regionale Toscana n. 42 del 24.01.2017
  Bozza di decreto dirigenziale ‘Riconoscimento alle aziende zootecniche dei danni da predazione provocati dal lupo (Canis lupus L.) — Approvazione bando annualità 2017 — 2020’, con allegati A e B |
| Type of measure | Scheme | — |
| Objective | Aid to compensate for the damage caused by protected animals |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: EUR 2,8 (in millions)
  Annual budget: EUR 0,7 (in millions) |
| Intensity | 100 % |
| Duration (period) | until 31.12.2020 |
| Economic sectors | Animal production |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Regione Toscana |
| Piazza del Duomo 10 Firenze |

Date of adoption of the decision

29.09.2017

Aid number

SA.47863 (2017/N)

Member State

Italy

Region

TOSCANA

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Riconoscimento alle aziende zootecniche dei danni da predazione provocati da lupo (Canis lupus L.)

Legal basis

Delibera di Giunta Regionale Toscana n. 42 del 24.01.2017

Bozza di decreto dirigenziale ‘Riconoscimento alle aziende zootecniche dei danni da predazione provocati dal lupo (Canis lupus L.) — Approvazione bando annualità 2017 — 2020’, con allegati A e B

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Aid to compensate for the damage caused by protected animals

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: EUR 2,8 (in millions)

Annual budget: EUR 0,7 (in millions)

Intensity

100 %

Duration (period)

until 31.12.2020

Economic sectors

Animal production

Name and address of the granting authority

Regione Toscana

Piazza del Duomo 10 Firenze

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm.

---
IN RE Jonathan A. HAMPTON, Petitioner.

No. 19-8033.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 26, 2020

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [S-42-2022]

      ( print page 33706)    
On March 28, 2022, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the Eastern Distribution Center, Inc., grantee of FTZ 24, requesting subzone status subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 24, on behalf of Sandvik Mining and Construction Logistics Limited, in Clarks Summit, Pennsylvania.

                    The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and Regulations, including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (87 FR 19474-19475, April 4, 2022). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed the application and determined that it meets the criteria for approval. Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board Executive Secretary (15 CFR 400.36(f)), the application to establish Subzone 24G was approved on May 26, 2022, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.13, and further subject to FTZ 24's 2,000-acre activation limit.                

Dated: May 26, 2022.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-11863 Filed 6-2-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:



| | (1) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-94640) of ScanSource, Inc. dated July 17, 1995;
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-08884) of ScanSource, Inc. dated April 10, 1998;
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (3) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-49879) of ScanSource, Inc. dated April 10, 1998;
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-78281) of ScanSource, Inc. dated May 12, 1999;
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (5) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-36766) of ScanSource, Inc. dated May 11, 2000;
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (6) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-110220) of ScanSource, Inc. dated November 4, 2003;
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (7) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-115534) of ScanSource, Inc. dated May 14, 2004;
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (8) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-144121) of ScanSource, Inc. dated June 28, 2007
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (9) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-153653) of ScanSource, Inc. dated September 24, 2008
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our reports dated August 26, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of ScanSource, Inc.
and subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of ScanSource, Inc. and subsidiaries included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of ScanSource, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended June 30,
2010.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Greenville, South Carolina

August 26,
2010
Exhibit 10.3

                         EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT

      EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT, entered into as of January 19, 2004 by and
between BIB Holdings,  Ltd. ("Employer" or the "Company"),  a Nevada corporation
with an office at 7409 Oak Grove  Avenue,  Las Vegas,  Nevada  89117 and Jeffrey
Kaplan ("Executive").

      Whereas     Employer  and  Executive  entered  into a  written  employment
                  agreement   dated  as  October  29,   2003  (the   "Employment
                  Agreement"); and

      Whereas     Employer  and  Executive   desire  to  amend  the   Employment
                  Agreement  on the  terms  and  conditions  set  forth  in this
                  amendment ("Amendment").

      In  consideration  of the facts mentioned  above, and of the covenants and
conditions set out below, the parties agree as follows:

      1.  Employment.  During the Term of  Employment,  as defined in Section 2,
Employer  agrees to employ  Executive,  as Executive  Vice  President  and Chief
Financial  Officer,  subject to the  direction  and  control at all times by the
Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive  Officer.  Executive agrees to act
in the foregoing capacity, in accordance with the terms and conditions contained
in this Amendment and the Employment Agreement.

      2. Term. The term of Executive's  employment  shall commence on January 1,
2004 and continue until February 27, 2004 (the "Term").

      3. Compensation.  Employer shall pay to Executive an prorated salary based
on an annual base salary of $120,000. Employer shall pay to Executive additional
gross payments of $5,000 on January 28, 2004 and February 11, 2004, representing
the signing bonus due Executive under the Employment Agreement.  Executive shall
also receive  500,000 shares of the Company's  common stock, to be registered as
soon as possible but no later than 120 days from January 7, 2004.

      4. Benefits.  During the Term of this Amendment,  Executive is entitled to
two (2) vacation days and one (1) personal day.

      5. Reversion to Employment  Agreement.  During the Term of this Amendment,
Employer  and  Executive  may agree in  writing to revert  back to the  original
Employment Agreement. In such event, this Amendment shall become null and void.

      6. Breach of Agreement.  In the event of a breach of this Amendment by the
Employer,  Executive shall retain all rights and remedies available to him under
the Employment Agreement.

ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:

EMPLOYER:                               EXECUTIVE
BIB HOLDINGS, LTD.                      JEFFREY KAPLAN


/s/ Mark Binder                         /s/ Jeffrey Kaplan
-----------------------------------     ----------------------------------------
Mark Binder, Chairman of the Board      Jeffrey Kaplan
Attorney or Party without Attorney:

Reza Mirzaie (SBN 246953)

RUSS AUGUST & KABAT 

12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90025

Telephone No: 310-826-7474

Attorney For: Plaintiff Ref. No. or File No.:

4870-002D

For Court Use Only

Insert name of Court, and Judicial District and Branch Court:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Plaintiff: VIRTAMOVE, CORP.

Defendant: HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY

PROOF OF SERVICE Hearing Date: Time: Dept/Div: Case Number:

2:24-cv-00093

1. At the time of service I was at least 18 years of age and not a party to this action.

2. I served copies of the Summons in a Civil Action; Complaint; Civil Cover Sheet; Notice of Related Case; Notice of Designation

of Lead Counsel; Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark; Plaintiff's Corporate

Disclosure Statement; Appearance of Counsel (Neil A. Rubin); Appearance of Counsel (Jonathan Ma); Appearance of Counsel

(Amy E. Hayden); Appearance of Counsel (Christian W. Conkle); Appearance of Counsel (Marc A. Fenster)

3. a. Party served: HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY

b. Person served: Sarai Marin, Authorized to Accept service for CT Corporation System, Agent for Service of Process           

authorized to accept served under F.R.C.P. Rule 4.

4. Address where the party was served: 330 North Brand Boulevard, Glendale, CA 91203

5. I served the party:

a. by personal service. I personally delivered the documents listed in item 2 to the party or person authorized to receive

process for the party (1) on: Wed, Feb 14, 2024 (2) at: 12:35 PM

6. Person Who Served Papers:

a. Donald Wyman (787, Kern County) d. The Fee for Service was:   $138.55  

b. FIRST LEGAL

1517 W. Beverly Blvd.

LOS ANGELES, CA 90026

c. (213) 250-1111

7. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct.

02/15/2024

(Date) (Signature)

PROOF OF

SERVICE

10426282

(5616032)

Case 2:24-cv-00093-JRG Document 12 Filed 02/15/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 95
ex10-1.htm


  















 


SEARCH BY HEADLINES.COM CORP.


 


THIRD ADDENDUM TO LOAN AGREEMENT


 


 


Further to that certain Loan Agreement dated January 16, 2012 (the “Loan Agreement”) between Search By Headlines.com Corp. (the “Lender”) and Naked Boxer Brief Clothing Inc. (the “Borrower”), the Lender and the Borrower agree, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is acknowledged by each party, to, in accordance with Section 2.2 of the Loan Agreement, increase the principal amount of the Loan (as defined in the Loan Agreement) by $50,000 (the “Fourth Advance”) to a total of $275,000, of which $225,000 has previously been provided by the Lender to the Borrower, and an additional $50,000 will be provided by the Lender to the Borrower upon the execution of this Addendum.


 


The Lender and the Borrower agree that this Addendum forms a part of and is subject to the terms and conditions set out in the Loan Agreement and that the Fourth Advance forms part of the Loan and the Borrower’s Indebtedness (as those terms are defined in the Loan Agreement).  The Lender and the Borrower agree that the Loan Agreement and the General Security Agreement dated January 16, 2012 of the Borrower in favour of the Lender each remain in full force and effect and all of the terms and conditions in the Loan Agreement remain the same, except to the extent expressly amended by this Addendum.


 


This Addendum will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Province of British Columbia and any federal laws of Canada applicable therein, and the Borrower and the Lender hereby attorn to the jurisdiction of the courts of competent jurisdiction of the Province of British Columbia in any proceeding hereunder.


 


This Addendum may be signed by the parties in counterparts and delivered by facsimile transmission or other form of electronic communication capable of producing a printed copy.


 


This Addendum is effective as of the 7th day of May, 2012.








	
SEARCH BY HEADLINES.COM CORP.


 


 


Per: /s/ James P. Geiskopf                                                                            


      Authorized Signatory

	  	  
	  	  	  
	
NAKED BOXER BRIEF CLOTHING INC.


 


 


Per: /s/ Joel Primus                                                                 


      Authorized Signatory
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 02/19/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       88,917
COMMITMENTS
   6,670    5,073       44   76,474   81,395   83,188   86,512    5,729    2,405

CHANGES FROM 02/12/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        957)
     238      -93       44      548    1,053      830    1,004      127      -47

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     7.5      5.7      0.0     86.0     91.5     93.6     97.3      6.4      2.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       71)
       8        5        1       36       35       45       40
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 02/19/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      186,850
COMMITMENTS
  43,738   24,925    1,179  126,602  157,468  171,519  183,572   15,331    3,278

CHANGES FROM 02/12/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      6,059)
   1,154    2,234      -84    4,093    4,008    5,163    6,158      896      -99

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    23.4     13.3      0.6     67.8     84.3     91.8     98.2      8.2      1.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      144)
      39       14        3       70       40      112       54
```

----

Updated February 22, 2013
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

128827 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

RICK BEAVERS, Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices 

v SC: 128827 

 COA: 260475 
 Wayne CC: 03-309389-NO

BARTON MALOW COMPANY, 

JOMAR BUILDING COMPANY, INC.,

SPILLIS CARDELLA, DMJM, a/k/a 

DMJM, INC., and ROBERT SMITH, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 13, 2005 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p1121 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2005 

Clerk
# C_2017174EN.01000501.xml

| 1.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 174/5 |
| -------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | ------- |

---

Communication pursuant to Article 37(2) of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 908/2014 concerning the composition of the Conciliation Body, instituted in the context of the clearance of accounts of EAGF and the EAFRD

(2017/C 174/06)

Following Commission Decisions C(2016) 2864 of 18 May 2016 and C(2017) 2250 of 10 April 2017, the composition of the Conciliation Body is as follows:

| Chairperson: | Mr Herman HOOYBERGHS | —
appointed for the period 1.8.2016 – 31.7.2019 | — | appointed for the period 1.8.2016 – 31.7.2019 |
| ------------ | ------------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------- | - | ------------------------------------------------ |
| — | appointed for the period 1.8.2016 – 31.7.2019 | | | |
| Members: | Ms Isabel BOMBAL DÌAZ | —
re-appointed for the period 1.8.2017 – 31.7.2018 | — | re-appointed for the period 1.8.2017 – 31.7.2018 |
| — | re-appointed for the period 1.8.2017 – 31.7.2018 | | | |
| | Mr Gerald LAVERY | —
appointed for the period 1.8.2016 – 31.7.2019 | — | appointed for the period 1.8.2016 – 31.7.2019 |
| — | appointed for the period 1.8.2016 – 31.7.2019 | | | |
| | Mr Matthias REEH | —
appointed for the period 1.8.2016 – 31.7.2019 | — | appointed for the period 1.8.2016 – 31.7.2019 |
| — | appointed for the period 1.8.2016 – 31.7.2019 | | | |
| | Mr Godfried THISSEN | —
appointed for the period 1.8.2016 – 31.7.2019. | — | appointed for the period 1.8.2016 – 31.7.2019. |
| — | appointed for the period 1.8.2016 – 31.7.2019. | | | |

---
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,




SECTION 1350




In connection with the Annual Report of Mendocino Brewing Company, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yashpal Singh, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date:  March 31, 2011





/s/ Yashpal SinghYashpal Singh,Chief Executive Officer