alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michael M. MONZEL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7589.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied. Justice Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
# C_2017067EN.01000301.xml

| 3.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 67/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 67/3

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant positions at its meeting on 8 March 2016 concerning a draft decision relating to Case AT.39965(1) — Mushrooms

Rapporteur: France

(2017/C 67/04)

| 1. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the anticompetitive behaviour covered by the draft decision constitutes agreements and/or concerted practices between undertakings within the meaning of Article 101 of the TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the anticompetitive behaviour covered by the draft decision constitutes agreements and/or concerted practices between undertakings within the meaning of Article 101 of the TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement.

| 2. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the undertaking concerned by the draft decision has participated in a single and continuous infringement of Article 101 of the TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the undertaking concerned by the draft decision has participated in a single and continuous infringement of Article 101 of the TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement.

| 3. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the object of the agreements and/or concerted practices was to restrict competition within the meaning of Article 101 of the TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the object of the agreements and/or concerted practices was to restrict competition within the meaning of Article 101 of the TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement.

| 4. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the agreements and/or concerted practices have been capable of appreciably affecting trade between the Member States of the EU and EEA. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the agreements and/or concerted practices have been capable of appreciably affecting trade between the Member States of the EU and EEA.

| 5. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s assessment as regards the duration of the infringement. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s assessment as regards the duration of the infringement.

| 6. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission as regards the addressees of the decision. |
| --- | --- |

6.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission as regards the addressees of the decision.

| 7. | The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its Opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

7.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its Opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

Eastern District of Texas

JOSEPH BOND, on behalf of himself and others

similarly situated

Plaintiff

v.

FOLSOM INSURANCE AGENCY LLC

Defendant

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 1:24-CV-00075

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE

Proof Job #491422 Page 1

I, Betty Swinners, being duly sworn, state:

I am not a party to or interested in the outcome of this suit.

I received the following documents on March 22, 2024, at 8:17 pm. I delivered these documents to FOLSOM

INSURANCE AGENCY LLC in Kaufman County, TX on March 26, 2024 at 10:50 am at 421 West Mason

Street, Mabank, TX 75147 by leaving the following documents with Cody Folsom who as Owner is

authorized by appointment or by law to receive service of process for FOLSOM INSURANCE AGENCY

LLC.

SUMMONS, CIVIL COVER SHEET, COMPLAINT-CLASS ACTION, JURY TRAIL DEMAND

Unknown Race Male, est. age 45-54, glasses: N, Brown hair, 160 lbs to 180 lbs, 5' 9" to 6'.

Geolocation of Serve: https://google.com/maps?q=32.3670976333,-96.10884205

Photograph: See Exhibit 1

Total Cost: $119.00

My name is Betty Swinners, my date of birth is 5/5/1966, and my address is 8674 FM 3094, Scurry, TX

75158, and USA.

Case 1:24-cv-00075-MJT Document 5 Filed 03/27/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 18
Executed in

,

on .

/s/

Proof Job #491422 Page 2

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Betty Swinners

+1 (972) 948-3131

Certification Number: PSC-22117

Expiration Date: 3/31/2025

Kaufman County

TX 3/27/2024

Betty Swinners

Case 1:24-cv-00075-MJT Document 5 Filed 03/27/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 19
Proof Job #491422 Page 3

Case 1:24-cv-00075-MJT Document 5 Filed 03/27/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 20
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

HANSHOW TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD ) 

and SHANGHAI HANSHI ) 

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ) 

CO., LTD., ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiffs, ) Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP 

v. ) 

 ) 

SES-IMAGOTAG SA, ) 

SES-IMAGOTAG GMBH and ) 

CAPTANA GMBH, ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL 

 Notice is hereby given that David R. Pekarek Krohn of Perkins Coie LLP is admitted in 

the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas and hereby enters his appearance 

on behalf of the following Defendants: 

 SES-Imagotag SA 

 SES-Imagotag GmbH 

 Captana GmbH 

 

Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 40 Filed 04/26/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 466
2 

Dated: April 26, 2024 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/David R. Pekarek Krohn 

DAVID R. PEKAREK KROHN 

WI Bar No. 1092062 

DPekarekkrohn@perkinscoie.com 

PERKINS COIE LLP 

33 East Main Street, Suite 201 

Madison, WI 53703 

Phone: (608) 663-7460 

Fax: (608) 663-7499 

Attorney for Defendants SES-Imagotag SA, 

SES-Imagotag GmbH, and Captana GmbH 

Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 40 Filed 04/26/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 467
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing has been filed and 

served upon all counsel of record, via the Court’s CM/ECF system, as authorized by E. DIST. 

TEX. LOC. CT. R. CV-5(d) on this the 26th day of April, 2024. 

 /s/ David R. Pekarek Krohn 

Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 40 Filed 04/26/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 468
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 129 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J.Res.129

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                            Joint Resolution

 
  Appointing the day for the convening of the first session of the One 
                      Hundred Fourteenth Congress.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the first regular session 
of the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress shall begin at noon on Tuesday, 
January 6, 2015.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 19, 2016

d0216 

# Order

Clerk February 19, 2016

152788(53)

SC: 152788

In re PRICE, Minors. COA: 327001

Macomb CC Family Division:

2013

- 000413

- NA;

2013

- 000414

- NA

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s January 8,

2016 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered er roneously.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of President and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,

As Adopted
Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of LBI Media Holdings,
Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Jose Liberman, as President of the Company, and William S. Keenan, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ Jose LibermanJose LibermanPresidentMay 15, 2006By:

/s/ William S. KeenanWilliam S. KeenanChief Financial OfficerMay 15, 2006


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall
not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Warrant of Arrest in Rem – Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § No. 6:24-CV-00027

§

$698,230.00 IN UNITED STATES §

CURRENCY §

Defendant. §

WARRANT OF ARREST IN REM

TO: The United States Secret Service for the Eastern District of Texas and/or any other 

United States officer or employee, someone under contract with the United States, 

or someone specially appointed by the court.

On January 25, 2024, the United States filed a verified complaint for civil 

forfeiture in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas against 

$698,230.00 in United States currency (defendant property) alleging that the property is 

subject to seizure and forfeiture to the United States for the reasons alleged in the 

complaint.

The defendant property is currently in the possession, custody, or control of the 

United States.

In these circumstances, Supplemental Rule G(3)(b)(i) directs the Clerk of the 

Court to issue an arrest warrant in rem for the defendant property.

Supplemental Rule G(3)(c)(i) provides that the warrant of arrest in rem must be 

delivered to a person or organization authorized to execute it who may be a marshal or 

Case 6:24-cv-00027-JCB Document 1-3 Filed 01/25/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 23
Warrant of Arrest in Rem – Page 2 of 2

any other United States officer or employee, someone under contract with the United 

States, or someone specially appointed by the court for that purpose.

YOU ARE COMMANDED to do the following:

1. To arrest the defendant property as soon as practicable by serving a copy of 

this warrant on the custodian in whose possession, custody or control the property is 

presently found, and to use whatever means may be appropriate to protect and maintain it 

in your custody until further order of this Court.

2. Promptly after execution of this process, to file the same in this Court with 

your return thereon, identifying the individual(s) upon whom copies were served and the 

manner employed.

Dated: 

DAVID O’TOOLE

Clerk of the Court

United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Texas

By: _________________________

Deputy Clerk

Case 6:24-cv-00027-JCB Document 1-3 Filed 01/25/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 24
NO. 07-11-00050-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

MAY 20, 2011

MICHAEL GARCIA, APPELLANT

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

FROM THE 287TH DISTRICT COURT OF BAILEY COUNTY;

NO. 2637A; HONORABLE GORDON HOUSTON GREEN, JUDGE

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

Appellant, Michael Garcia, filed Notice of Appeal to appeal a judgment of 

conviction entered against him in cause number 2637A in the 287th District Court of 

Bailey County, Texas. However, appellant has now filed a motion to dismiss his appeal.

Because the motion meets the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 42.2(a) and this Court has not delivered its decision prior to receiving it, the 

motion is hereby granted and the appeal is dismissed. Having dismissed the appeal at 
2

appellant=s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will 

issue.

Mackey K. Hancock

Justice

Do not publish.
Report of Independent Accountants

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Salomon Brothers Variable Series Funds Inc


In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements of Salomon
Brothers Variable High Yield Bond Fund, Salomon Brothers Variable Strategic
Bond Fund, Salomon Brothers Variable Total Return Fund, Salomon Brothers
Variable Capital Fund, Salomon Brothers Variable Investors Fund, Salomon
Brothers Variable Small Cap Growth Fund (constituting Salomon Brothers
Variable Series Funds Inc, hereafter referred to as the  "Fund") for the
year ended December 31, 2000 we considered its internal control, including
control activities for safeguarding securities, in order to determine our
auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the
financial statements and to comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR, not
to provide assurance on internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and maintaining
internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and
judgments by management are required to assess the expected benefits and
related costs of controls.  Generally, controls that are relevant to an
audit pertain to the entity's objective of preparing financial statements
for external purposes that are fairly presented in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.  Those controls include the safeguarding of
assets against unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition.
Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or fraud may
occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any evaluation of internal
control to future periods is subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of
their design and operation may deteriorate.
Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily disclose all
matters in internal control that might be material weaknesses under
standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants.  A material weakness is a condition in which the design or
operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce
to a relatively low level the risk that misstatements caused by error or
fraud in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial
statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely
period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned
functions.  However, we noted no matters involving internal control and its
operation, including controls for safeguarding securities, that we consider
to be material weaknesses as defined above as of December 31, 2000.
This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Board of
Directors, management and the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not
intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified
parties.


February 14, 2001
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Salomon Brothers Variable Series Funds Inc

	(2)
EXHIBIT
32.1











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Performance Health Technologies, Inc.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Robert D. Prunetti, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
August 18, 2008


/s/ Robert D.
Prunetti


Robert D.
Prunetti


Chief
Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer)
Alexander MONZONI, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9790

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 03/05/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      169,203
COMMITMENTS
  38,608   38,406   25,538   88,366   80,565  152,512  144,509   16,691   24,694

CHANGES FROM 02/26/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -8,646)
     867    2,404    1,074   -9,711  -11,278   -7,771   -7,800     -875     -846

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    22.8     22.7     15.1     52.2     47.6     90.1     85.4      9.9     14.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      195)
      51       49       50       67       73      145      150
```

----

Updated March 8, 2013
# C_2017103EN.01000201.xml

| 1.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/2

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya apply

(2017/C 103/02)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1).

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44 (2).

2

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DGC 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DGC 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/44.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil the listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the statement of reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with Section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (3).

3

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 12, 19.1.2016, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

3

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

GRAHAM NICHOLAS NORBY

- VARDAC,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 524 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 5th day of January, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.

Justice Brobson did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.