alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TYLER DIVISION

RAVEN LANHAM,

 Plaintiff,

v.

COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL 

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

 Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§ CASE NO. 6:23-cv-513-JDK-KNM

§

§ 

§

§

§

§

§

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Raven Lanham filed this appeal from a final administrative decision of the 

Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying her application for supplemental 

secure income and child disability benefits. The case was referred to United States Magistrate 

Judge K. Nicole Mitchell for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for 

disposition. Before the Court is the Commissioner’s Unopposed Motion to Remand for Further 

Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Docket No. 9.

On February 14, 2024, Judge Mitchell issued a Report recommending that the Court grant 

the unopposed motion to remand. Docket No. 10. The Report recommends that the Court reverse 

the Commissioner’s final administrative decision and remand this matter to the Commissioner for 

further administrative proceedings. No written objections have been filed. 

This Court reviews the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge de novo only if a 

party objects within fourteen days of service of the Report and Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 

Case 6:23-cv-00513-JDK-KNM Document 11 Filed 03/05/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 3541
2 

636(b)(1). In conducting a de novo review, the Court examines the entire record and makes an 

independent assessment under the law. Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 

1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), superseded on other grounds by statute, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) 

(extending the time to file objections from ten to fourteen days). 

Here, the parties did not object in the prescribed period. The Court therefore reviews the 

Magistrate Judge’s findings for clear error or abuse of discretion and reviews the legal conclusions 

to determine whether they are contrary to law. See United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 

1221 (5th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 916 (1989) (holding that the standard of review is 

“clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law” if no objections to a Magistrate 

Judge’s Report are filed). 

Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and the record in this case, the Court finds 

no clear error or abuse of discretion and no conclusions contrary to law. 

Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the United 

States Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 10) as the findings of this Court. The Unopposed Motion to 

Remand (Docket No. 9) is GRANTED. The Commissioner’s final administrative decision is 

REVERSED and the matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative 

proceedings pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). 

So ORDERED and SIGNED this day of

___________________________________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5th March, 2024.

Case 6:23-cv-00513-JDK-KNM Document 11 Filed 03/05/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 3542
# C_2017421EN.01002201.xml

| 8.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/22

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2017/C 421/18)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 10.10.2017 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 10.10.2017-31.12.2017 |
| Member State | Belgium |
| Stock or Group of stocks | ANF/*8ABDE (special condition to ANF/07.) |
| Species | Anglerfish (Lophiidae) |
| Zone | VIIIa, VIIIb, VIIId and VIIIe |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 23/TQ127 |

Date and time of closure

10.10.2017

Duration

10.10.2017-31.12.2017

Member State

Belgium

Stock or Group of stocks

ANF/*8ABDE (special condition to ANF/07.)

Species

Anglerfish (Lophiidae)

Lophiidae

Zone

VIIIa, VIIIb, VIIId and VIIIe

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

23/TQ127

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. (the‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-Q for the periodending September 30, 2006 filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’),I, Jennifer Magro, Chief Financial Officer and Director of CitigroupManaged Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

|           |                                                                                                                     |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and |

|           |                                                                                                                                                       |
|-----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership. |

Date:    November 14, 2006

/s/ JenniferMagro

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

JenniferMagroCitigroup Managed Futures LLC Chief Financial Officer andDirector

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 28, 2020

No. 04-18-00411-CV

REPSOL OIL AND GAS USA, LLC as successor of Talisman Energy USA Inc, Statoil Texas 

Onshore Properties, LLC, and Statoil Pipelines, LLC, and OGE, LLC,

Appellants

v.

MATRIX PETROLEUM, LLC, Matrix Petroleum Holdings LLC, JAR Resources Holdings, 

L.P., and TMRX Petroleum, LLC,

Appellees

From the 218th Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-08-00158-CVL

Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellees’ second joint motion for an extension of time to file the appellees’ briefs is 

granted. We order the appellees’ briefs due May 27, 2020. Counsel is advised that no further 

extensions of time will be granted absent a timely motion that (1) demonstrates extraordinary 

circumstances justifying further delay, (2) advises the court of the efforts counsel has expended 

in preparing the brief, and (3) provides the court reasonable assurance that the brief will be 

completed and filed by the requested extended deadline. The court does not generally consider a 

heavy work schedule to be an extraordinary circumstance.

________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 28th day of April, 2020.

________________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC Form
10-K and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000918642
<NAME> TRIPLE S PLASTICS, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         5594000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 10196000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    709000
<INVENTORY>                                    4386000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              21074000
<PP&E>                                        42003000
<DEPRECIATION>                                16293000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                50809000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         10787000
<BONDS>                                        6862000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      14468000
<OTHER-SE>                                    16485000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  50809000
<SALES>                                       67772000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              67772000
<CGS>                                         56647000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 56647000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1441000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               1071000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              603000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1505000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (453000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (1052000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1052000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.28)


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. TREMAR JONES, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 26 EAL 2015 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 11th day of June, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed February 3, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-1887

Lower Tribunal No. 12-18272

________________

Royce Reed,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose L. Fernandez, Judge.

Royce Reed, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before MILLER, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
MICHAEL REIGELSPERGER

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 4902

__ ___________________________/

Opinion filed June 5, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Linda F. McCallum , Judge

.

Michael Reigelsperger, pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Samuel B. Steinberg, Assistant Attorn ey

General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, ROWE, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
EXHIBIT 23.01

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. (33-84726, 33-84728, 333-25981, and
333-114019) of Paul-Son Gaming Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form S-8 and Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement No. 333-86010
of Paul-Son Gaming Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form S-3 of our report dated March 30, 2004 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an
explanatory paragraph on the Company's adoption of Statement of Accounting Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets"), appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Paul-Son Gaming Corporation and Subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2003.

/s/
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Las
Vegas, Nevada
March 30, 2004

---
AO 120 (Rev. 08/10) 

TO: Mail Stop 8

Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

P.O. Box 1450

Alexandria, VA 22313-1450

REPORT ON THE

FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN

ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR

TRADEMARK

In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been

filed in the U.S. District Court on the following

Trademarks or Patents. ( the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):

DOCKET NO. DATE FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT

PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:

DATE INCLUDED INCLUDED BY

Amendment Answer Cross Bill Other Pleading

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:

DECISION/JUDGEMENT

CLERK (BY) DEPUTY CLERK DATE

Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director

Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy

Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 2 Filed 12/19/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 300
EXHIBIT 9

REDACTED IN ITS 

ENTIRETY

To Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to 

Dismiss Complaint

Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 52-10 Filed 08/06/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 845
Jerome KUNKEL, et al., Petitioners, v. NORTHERN KENTUCKY INDEPENDENT HEALTH DISTRICT, et al.

No. 19-837.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Kentucky denied.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                     Exhibit 15b



                      Independent Accountants' Review Report


To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
Horizon Group, Inc.

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated condensed balance sheet of
Horizon Group, Inc. (the Company) as of March 31, 1998, and the related
consolidated condensed statements of operations and cash flows for the
three-month period then ended.  These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management.  We did not make a similar review
of the consolidated condensed statements of operations and cash flows for the
three month period ended March 31, 1997.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to
financial data, and making inquires of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted
in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, which will be
performed for the full year with the objective of expressing an opinion
regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not
express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements at
March 31, 1998, and for the three-month period then ended for them to be in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of December 31,
1997, and the related consolidated statement of operations, shareholders'
equity and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein) and in our
report dated March 13, 1998 (except for the second paragraph of Note 3 and the
fourth and fifth paragraphs of Note 4, as to which the date is April 1, 1998)
we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated
condensed balance sheet as of December 31, 1997, is fairly stated, in all
material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it
has been derived.


Chicago, Illinois                               /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
May 7, 1998                                     ---------------------
                                                ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                 
                 






                                       16
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 02/26/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       52,393
COMMITMENTS
   2,691    7,723    4,084   44,451   39,567   51,226   51,374    1,167    1,019

CHANGES FROM 02/19/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,119)
  -1,428       83    1,414    2,049      732    2,035    2,229       84     -110

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     5.1     14.7      7.8     84.8     75.5     97.8     98.1      2.2      1.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       46)
       5        9       10       24       25       35       39`

---

Updated March 1, 2013
Richard SHELLEY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5449

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,**


**SECTION 1350**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Mendocino Brewing Company, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, N. Mahadevan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




|(1) | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date:
      March 31, 2007




/s/ N. MahadevanName:
              N. MahadevanTitle:
              Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5
       
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                         DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               426,097
<SECURITIES>                                         1,359,721
<RECEIVABLES>                                        000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         000
<INVENTORY>                                          000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     19,258
<PP&E>                                               000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       29,943,845<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                166,154<F2>
<BONDS>                                              000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                000
<PREFERRED>                                          000
<COMMON>                                             000
<OTHER-SE>                                           29,777,691
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         29,943,845
<SALES>                                              000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     57,387<F3>
<CGS>                                                000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     306,969<F4>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      000
<CHANGES>                                            000
<NET-INCOME>                                         (1,388,692)<F5>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (37.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        000
<FN>
<F1>Included  in  total  assets:   Investments  in  Local  Limited  Partnerships
$27,621,713   Restricted  cash  $495,389,   Organizational  costs,  net  $21,667
<F2>Current  liabilities  include  Accounts payable to affiliate of $137,420 and
Accrued expenses of $28,734.
<F3>Total revenue includes: Investment $40,245 and Other $17,142.
<F4>Included  in Other  Expenses:  Asset  Management  fees  $144,026,  General  and  Administrative  $139,015,  and
Amortization $23,928.
<F5>Net loss includes:  Equity in losses of Local Limited Partnerships of $1,139,110.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>