alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020011EN.01009301.xml

| 13.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/93 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/93

---

P8_TA(2018)0368

Administrative cooperation in the field of excise duties as regards the content of electronic register *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 3 October 2018 on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EU) No 389/2012 on administrative cooperation in the field of excise duties as regards the content of electronic register (COM(2018)0349 – C8-0371/2018 – 2018/0181(CNS))

(Special legislative procedure – consultation)

(2020/C 011/22)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2018)0349), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2018)0349),

| — | having regard to Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0371/2018), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0371/2018),

| — | having regard to Rule 78c of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 78c of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A8-0285/2018), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A8-0285/2018),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

2.

| 3. | Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

3.

| 4. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments. |
| --- | --- |

4.

---
Immanuel F. SANCHEZ, Petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA, et al.

No. 19-7077

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
LIN OUYANG, Petitioner, v. ACHEM INDUSTRY AMERICA, INC.

No. 19-7926.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of
BioSphere Medical, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Paul A. Looney, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                         |  |  |  | 
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  |  |  | 
|Dated: March 30, 2004 |  | /s/    PAUL A.
LOONEY  
|                      |  | Paul A. Looney         
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1998
<CASH>                                           2,934
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,069
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (152)
<INVENTORY>                                      6,043
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,252
<PP&E>                                           4,134
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (3,034)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,421
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,363
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            74
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,888
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,421
<SALES>                                         12,539
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,539
<CGS>                                            5,310
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,310
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,736
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (95)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,277)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,277)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,277)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.18)
        


</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

RAYMOND ROGERS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4402 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed January 4, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Nancy Moate Ley, Judge. Raymond Rogers, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and C. Todd Chapman, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
CASANUEVA, KELLY, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF JUNE 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND DECEMBER 31,
1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,153,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               33,574,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,624,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                     104,452,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,046,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             138,018,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,801,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     15,000
<COMMON>                                        40,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  56,176,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               138,018,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,268,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,501,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,491,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,834,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,282,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,282,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,282,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
NAGEL RICE, LLP, et al., Petitioners v. VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC., et al.

No. 18-1503

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Phillip Earl CRENSHAW, Jr., Petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 19M121.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 6, 2020

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
----

|   | (i)    | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|   | (ii)   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                            |

|                 |   |                                      |   |
|----------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: August 6, 2010 |   | /s/ Francis M. DiNuzzo                    |   |
|                 |   | Francis M. DiNuzzoChief Executive Officer |   |
Patrick JONES, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5871

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Gerald S. LEPRE, Jr., Petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA, et al.

No. 18-9730

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
# C_2017384EN.01000902.xml

| 14.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 384/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 384/9

---

EUROPEAN SECURITIES AND MARKETS AUTHORITY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2016

(2017/C 384/33)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://www.esma.europa.eu/databases-library/esma-library/?f%25255B0%25255D=im_esma_sections%3A420&f%5B0%5D=im_esma_sections%3A420

---
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 2 

Expressing the sense of Congress that a commemorative postage stamp should 

be issued in honor of George Thomas ‘‘Mickey’’ Leland. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2013 

Ms. JACKSON LEE submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that a commemorative 

postage stamp should be issued in honor of George 

Thomas ‘‘Mickey’’ Leland. 

Whereas George Thomas Leland (affectionately known as 

‘‘Mickey’’), in the course of his 6 terms as a member of 

the House of Representatives from the State of Texas, 

emerged as a national spokesman regarding the problem 

of hunger in the United States and throughout the world; 

Whereas Mickey Leland was instrumental in establishing the 

Select Committee on Hunger and served as chairman of 

that committee until the time of his death; 

Whereas in the capacity of chairman of the Select Committee 

on Hunger, Mickey Leland helped generate public awareness of the complex issues relating to the alleviation of 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HCON 2 IH 

hunger and demonstrated strong personal moral leadership; 

Whereas it was his leadership that guided the Hunger Prevention Act of 1988, which required the Secretary of Agriculture not only to distribute surplus food, but also to 

purchase additional food for future distributions to needy 

households; 

Whereas Mickey Leland brought together entertainment personalities, religious leaders, and private volunteer agencies to generate public support for the African Famine 

Relief and Recovery Act of 1985, which provided 

$800,000,000 in food and humanitarian relief supplies; 

Whereas the various initiatives brought forth by Mickey Leland to eradicate world hunger undoubtedly saved thousands of lives; 

Whereas 2007 marks the 18th anniversary of Mickey Leland’s death; 

Whereas Mickey Leland died as he lived: on a mission to 

make a positive difference in this world; and 

Whereas commemorative postage stamps have been commissioned to honor other great leaders in American history: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that— 

3 (1) a commemorative postage stamp should be 

4 issued in honor of George Thomas ‘‘Mickey’’ Leland; 

5 and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with 
3 

•HCON 2 IH 

1 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee 

2 should recommend to the Postmaster General that 

3 such a stamp be issued. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-31252

Summary Calendar

 

DAVID L. KING,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, 

Commissioner of Social Security,

 Defendant-Appellee.

----------------------------------------------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 98-CV-595

----------------------------------------------------------

September 27, 2000

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM:*

David King appealsthe affirmance of the Commissioner’s denial of his application for socialsecurity

disability insurance benefits. He argues that the ALJ’s finding that he was not disabled is not based

on substantial evidence. This decision was based on a credibility judgment, which was consistent with

other evidence presented, and isthus entitled to great deference. See Newton v. Apfel, 209 F.3d 448,
 

 

459 (5th Cir. 2000). King has failed to show that the ALJ’s finding was not based o n substantial

evidence. 

King also arguesthat the ALJimproperly used the medical vocational guidelines as a “guide”

in making his disability determination. Although the ALJ did consult these guidelines, his decision

was also based on the testimony of a vocational expert. The correct legal standard was thus applied.

See Scott v. Shalala, 30 F.3d 33, 35 (5th Cir. 1994). King has failed to show that the ALJ’s decision

was not supported by substantial evidence in the record or that the proper legal standards were not

used in evaluating the evidence. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 23, 2015

No. 04-15-00070-CV

SKYLINE EMS INC. and Juan “Johnny” Cordero,

Appellants

v.

AR CONCEPTS INC.,

Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-15618

The Honorable Richard E. Price, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellee’s brief was due on July 13, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b). On July 20, 

2015, Appellee filed an unopposed first motion for an extension of time to file its brief until 

August 17, 2015, for an extension of thirty-five days.

Appellee’s motion is GRANTED. Appellee must file its brief with this court by August 

17, 2015.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 23rd day of July, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
DEKALB BANKSHARES, INC.

                                                                      Exhibit 32
                Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The  undersigned,  who is the chief  executive  officer and the chief  financial
officer of DeKalb  Bankshares,  Inc.,  hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge,  the  accompanying  Form 10-QSB of the issuer fully complies with the
requirements  of Section  13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
and that information  contained in the report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.



Date:  May 15, 2006             /s/ William C. Bochette, III
-------------------                 --------------------------------------------
                                   William C. Bochette, III
                                   Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
                                   Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 441 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 441

 Expressing support for the designation of May 2012 as National Youth 
                         Traffic Safety Month.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2012

Mr. Rockefeller (for himself, Mrs. Hutchison, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Pryor, 
and Mr. Thune) submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing support for the designation of May 2012 as National Youth 
                         Traffic Safety Month.

Whereas motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death for youth in the 
        United States;
Whereas thousands of youth are injured or die each year in motor vehicle 
        crashes;
Whereas on average, 11 youths die each day in motor vehicle crashes;
Whereas on average, May through August is the deadliest period for youths on our 
        nation's highways;
Whereas on average, 8 of the top 10 deadliest days for youths on our nation's 
        highways were between May and August;
Whereas events such as prom and graduation, and the summer driving season, 
        contribute to the risk of a motor vehicle crash due to an increase in 
        the amount of time youth spend on the road and in celebratory 
        activities;
Whereas it is essential to teach our youths that driving is a privilege and with 
        that privilege comes risks and responsibilities;
Whereas this education is essential to preventing risky behaviors that can 
        result in tragic crashes;
Whereas the National Organizations For Youth Safety (NOYS) established a 
        national youth campaign and National Youth Traffic Safety Month to draw 
        attention to the increased rate of motor vehicle crashes involving youth 
        between May and August, to help enforce youth safe driving laws, and to 
        support youth and community education on youth traffic safety; and
Whereas NOYS invites all youths, families, and communities to participate in 
        National Youth Traffic Safety Month:
Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) expresses support for the designation of May 2012 as 
        ``National Youth Traffic Safety Month'';
            (2) supports youth traffic safety awareness; and
            (3) encourages people across the United States to observe 
        National Youth Traffic Safety Month with appropriate programs, 
        activities, and ceremonies.
                                 <all>
```
IA 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 57 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to require 

a two-thirds vote of each House of Congress to increase the statutory 

limit on the public debt. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 1, 2013 

Mr. NEUGEBAUER introduced the following joint resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to require a two-thirds vote of each House of 

Congress to increase the statutory limit on the public 

debt. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 57 IH 

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

2 for ratification: 

3 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. Congress shall, by law, establish a stat5 utory limit on the public debt. If such a limit is in effect 

6 upon the date of adoption of this article, that limit shall 

7 be the limit for purposes of this section. 

8 ‘‘SECTION 2. The statutory limit on the public debt 

9 may only be increased by the passage of legislation upon 

10 the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the Members of each 

11 House, a quorum being present.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2017370EN.01000301.xml

| 31.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 370/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 370/3

---

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

(2017/C 370/03)

Pursuant to the first indent of Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1), the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are hereby amended as follows:

1

2

On page 379

On page 379

| 9403 | Other furniture and parts thereof |
| --- | --- |

9403

9403

Other furniture and parts thereof

Other furniture and parts thereof

The following text and images are added after the existing text:

The following text and images are added after the existing text:

‘This heading also includes storage cubes made of various materials, for example, wood or paperboard, which may be covered with, for example, imitation leather or textile material, whether or not foldable, with a lid. They are designed to be placed on the floor, for storing objects and to be used as a seat.

Examples:

Image ’

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1).

1

(2)  OJ C 76, 4.3.2015, p. 1.

2

---