alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 587 

Supporting ‘‘Lights On Afterschool’’, a national celebration of afterschool 

programs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 22 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 21), 2012 

Mrs. BOXER (for herself, Ms. COLLINS, and Mr. WHITEHOUSE) submitted the 

following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting ‘‘Lights On Afterschool’’, a national celebration 

of afterschool programs. 

Whereas high-quality afterschool programs provide safe, challenging, engaging, and fun learning experiences that help 

children and youth develop social, emotional, physical, 

cultural, and academic skills; 

Whereas high-quality afterschool programs support working 

families by ensuring that the children in those families 

are safe and productive after the regular school day ends; 

Whereas high-quality afterschool programs build stronger 

communities by involving students, parents, business 

leaders, and adult volunteers in the lives of children in 

the United States, thereby promoting positive relationships among children, youth, families, and adults; 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 587 ATS 

Whereas high-quality afterschool programs engage families, 

schools, and diverse community partners in advancing the 

well-being of children in the United States; 

Whereas ‘‘Lights On Afterschool’’, a national celebration of 

afterschool programs held on October 18, 2012, highlights the critical importance of high-quality afterschool 

programs in the lives of children, their families, and their 

communities; 

Whereas more than 28,000,000 children in the United States 

have parents who work outside the home and approximately 15,100,000 children in the United States have no 

place to go after school; and 

Whereas nearly 2 in 5 afterschool programs report that their 

budgets are in worse condition today than at the height 

of the recession in 2008, and more than 3 in 5 afterschool programs report that their level of funding is lower 

than it was 3 years ago, making it difficult for afterschool programs across the United States to keep their 

doors open and their lights on: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate supports ‘‘Lights On After2 school’’, a national celebration of afterschool programs 

3 held on October 18, 2012. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 Eastern District of Texas

Hanshow Technology Co., Ltd.

SES-imagotag SA et al.

2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP

Defendants SES-imagotag SA, SES-imagotag GmbH, and CAPTANA GMBH

02/15/2024 s/ Matthew J. Moffa

Matthew J. Moffa 5045067(NY)

Perkins Coie LLP

1155 Avenue of the Americas, 22nd Floor

New York, NY 10036-2711

MMoffa@perkinscoie.com

(212) 261-6857

(212) 399-8057

Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 15 Filed 02/15/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 321
Exhibit A

Redacted in Entirety

Case 2:24-cv-00021-JRG Document 54-2 Filed 07/18/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 3113
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/20/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       39,198
COMMITMENTS
   2,364    5,422    2,742   34,008   30,903   39,114   39,067       84      131

CHANGES FROM 08/13/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,665)
    -324     -446      186   -1,587   -1,465   -1,725   -1,725       60       60

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     6.0     13.8      7.0     86.8     78.8     99.8     99.7      0.2      0.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       38)
       7        8        7       17       17       28       28`

---

Updated August 23, 2013
Brian K. BANKS, Petitioner v. LOUISIANA.

No. 19-5022

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit denied.
ex4-5b.htm


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Annual Report for Rainchief Energy Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report), the undersigned, Brad J. Moynes, President of the Company do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:








	
(1) 

	
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and













	
(2) 

	
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, theFinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.







 


 



May 1, 2012




By:







/s/ Brad J. Moynes


Brad J. Moynes


President
Tommy ADAMS, Jr., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7706.

Supreme Court of the United States.

June 1, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
ORDER – Solo Page

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

VIRTAMOVE, CORP.,

Plaintiff,

v.

HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE 

COMPANY,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Case No. 2:24-cv-00093-JRG

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS 

Before the Court is Defendant Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company’s Rule 12(b)(6) 

Partial Motion to Dismiss and Brief in Support of Same. The Court, having considered same, is 

of the opinion that Defendant’s Motion should be GRANTED.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff VirtaMove, Corp.’s claims of pre-suit 

indirect infringement and pre-suit willful infringement are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE.

Case 2:24-cv-00093-JRG Document 22-1 Filed 04/15/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 118
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATION AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000911583
<NAME> STEINWAY MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-03-1999
<CASH>                                           6,809
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   67,458
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,712
<INVENTORY>                                     93,851
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               169,707
<PP&E>                                         115,742
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,111
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 309,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,179
<BONDS>                                        133,480
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      93,791
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   309,800
<SALES>                                         83,134
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                83,134
<CGS>                                           55,707
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,531
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,097
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    52
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,864
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,883
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,695
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,188
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,188
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56
        

</TABLE>
# C_2018034EN.01000301.xml

| 31.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8348 — RAG Stiftung/Evonik Industries/Huber Silica)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 34/02)

On 22 June 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8348. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8348. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

Autoscribe Corporation, §

§

 Plaintiff, §

§

v. § Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00390-JRG

§

PAYMENT SAVVY, LLC §

§

Defendant. §

DEFENDANT PAYMENT SAVVY, LLC’S FED.R.CIV.P. 7.1 

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant Payment Savvy, 

LLC, by and through its undersigned counsel, certifies that as of this date, it has no parent 

corporation and that no publicly-held corporation owns 10% or more of its stock.

Dated: November 17, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Mark D. Nielsen

Mark D. Nielsen

State Bar No. 24062361

Scheef & Stone, LLP

2600 Network Blvd., Suite 400

Frisco, Texas 75034

(214) 472-2100 (Ph)

(214) 472-2150 (Fax)

Mark.Nielsen@solidcounsel.com

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/ 

COUNTER-CLAIMANT,

PAYMENT SAVVY, LLC

Case 2:23-cv-00390-JRG Document 16 Filed 11/17/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 60
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on November 17, 2023, the foregoing was electronically filed with the 

Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send a notification of the filing via electronic mail to 

all counsel of record.

/s/ Mark D. Nielsen

Mark D. Nielsen

Case 2:23-cv-00390-JRG Document 16 Filed 11/17/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 61
Lloyd N. JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. Karen RIMMER, et al.

No. 19-701

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Hal Bernard BLACK, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5352

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# C_2017384EN.01000904.xml

| 14.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 384/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 384/9

---

EUROPEAN UNION AGENCY FOR FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2016

(2017/C 384/35)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://fra.europa.eu/en/about-fra/finance-and-budget/financial-documents

---
James Paul ARLOTTA, petitioner, v. McKESSON CORPORATION, et al.

No. 18-8959.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 5, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed March 4, 2015.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D14-2906

Lower Tribunal No. 13-10033

________________



### D’Andre Braddy,

Appellant,

vs.



### The State of Florida

, Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the

Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Ariana Fajardo

, Judge.

D’Andre Braddy

, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SUAREZ, EMAS, and SCALES, JJ.

SUAREZ, J.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of the Defendant’s Florida Rule of

Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion without prejudice to Defendant’s direct appeal

filed in this court under case number 3D14-2646.
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Gail Babitt, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Visual Data Corporation on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Visual Data Corporation.

January 13, 2003

                                         By: /s/ Gail Babitt
                                             ---------------------------
                                         Name:   Gail Babitt
                                         Title:  Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
[TRANSLATED FROM THE HEBREW]


                                   [EMBLEM OF
                              THE STATE OF ISRAEL]

MINISTRY OF JUSTICE                                      REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES
                               THE STATE OF ISRAEL


                THE COMPANIES ORDINANCE [NEW VERSION], 5743-1983


                  CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION AND REGISTRATION
                              OF A PRIVATE COMPANY



This is to certify that:


                              SCANVEC CO (1990) LTD


was incorporated and approved pursuant to the Companies Ordinance as a company
with limited liability


on the 30th day of July 1990; the 8th day of Av 5750.


Given under my hand in Jerusalem  this 30th day of July 1990;  the 8th day of Av
5750.


(Signed)
Registrar of Companies


                                [REGISTRY STAMP]


                                                         Company No. 51-149353-8


[Stamp - "Registrar of Companies & Partnerships - Copy accords with the original
-  27.06.2000  (-) Annetta  Klein - Fee total __ - Receipt no.  __________  - pp
Registrar of Companies"]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

VIRTAMOVE, CORP.,

Plaintiff,

v.

HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE 

COMPANY,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:24-cv-00093-JRG 

(Lead Case)

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

VIRTAMOVE, CORP.,

Plaintiff,

v.

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES 

CORP.,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:24-CV-00064-JRG

(Member Case)

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

Case 2:24-cv-00093-JRG Document 35-1 Filed 04/23/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 158
On this date the Court considered the Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to 

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 15), filed by Plaintiff VirtaMove Corp. (“Plaintiff” or

“VirtaMove”) and Defendant International Business Machines Corp. (“Defendant”). Based on the 

motion and the grounds set forth therein, and the agreement of the Parties in the motion, the Court 

finds that good cause has been established and the Joint Motion for Extension of Time should be 

granted. 

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s time to respond to the 

Motion shall be extended by two weeks, from April 29, 2024 to May 13, 2024.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s time to reply in support of

the Motion shall be extended from May 6, 2024 to May 29, 2024. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Case 2:24-cv-00093-JRG Document 35-1 Filed 04/23/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 159
**Exhibit 12**

** **

**J.B. POINDEXTER AND SUBSIDIARIES**COMPUTATION OFRATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES********(in millions, except ratios)

 
| ** **                                                                                             | ** ** | **Year ended December 31,** | ** ** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|----------------------------------|------------|
|                                                                                                   | ** ** | **2004**                         | ** ** | **2005** | ** ** | **2006** | ** ** | **2007** | ** ** | **2008** | ** ** |
| Earnings                                                                                               |       |                             |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Pretax income  from continuing operations                                                              |       | 14.5                             |       | 7.7 |   | 11.6 |   | 2.3 |   | 11.6 |   |
| Add: Fixed  charges (see below)                                                                        |       | 17.0                             |       | 21.1 |   | 21.5 |   | 21.3 |   | 21.3 |   |
| Add:  Amortization of capitalized interest                                                             |       | —                           |       | — |   | — |   | — |   | — |   |
| Less:  Capitalized interest                                                                            |       | —                           |       | — |   | — |   | (0.6 | ) | (0.4 | ) |
|                                                                                                   |       | 31.5                             |       | 28.8 |   | 33.1 |   | 23.0 |   | 32.5 |   |
| Fixed charges                                                                                          |       |                             |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest, either  expensed or capitalized, and amortized capitalized expenses related to  indebtedness |       | 14.4                             |       | 18.5 |   | 18.9 |   | 18.7 |   | 18.5 |   |
| An estimate of  the interest within lease expense                                                      |       | 2.6                              |       | 2.6 |   | 2.6 |   | 2.6 |   | 2.8 |   |
|                                                                                                   |       | 17.0                             |       | 21.1 |   | 21.5 |   | 21.3 |   | 21.3 |   |
|                                                                                                   |       |                             |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Ratio of  Earnings to Fixed Charges (A/B)                                                              |       | 1.9x                             |       | 1.4x |   | 1.5x |   | 1.1x |   | 1.5x |   |

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

HIL RIZVI, M.D.,

Petitioner

v.

BUREAU OF PROFESSIONAL AND 

OCCUPATIONAL AFFAIRS, STATE 

BOARD OF MEDICINE,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 147 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of September, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal, the Application for Reconsideration of Denial of Stay, Motions for Leave to File 

an Amended Complaint, and the Application to Expedite are DENIED.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 13, 2023

NO. 03-23-00223-CV

Shereen Jordan, Appellant

v.

Justin Jordan, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES KELLY AND THEOFANIS

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the order denying appellant’s motion to modify temporary orders and the

order denying appellant’s motion for sanctions, both signed by the trial court on March 31, 2023.

Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. 

Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent 

and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Michael Ramon OCHOA, Petitioner, v. Arthur LEVINE, et al.

No. 19-905.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh Office denied.
```

```

----

Updated September 12, 2014
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 74 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 3547, 

3 the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall amend the 

4 long title so as to read: ‘‘Making consolidated appropria-
2 

•HCON 74 EH 

1 tions for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2014, and 

2 for other purposes.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 15, 

2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 74 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for a correction in the enrollment of H.R. 

3547.
IN RE Steven Darby MCDONALD, Petitioner.

No. 19-7143

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Sir Giorgio Sanford CLARDY, Petitioner, v. Garth GULICK, et al.

No. 19-7159

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.