alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FILED

September 19, 1997

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

JULY 1997 SESSION

JOHN L. GOODWIN, III, )

) C.C.A. NO. 01C01-9608-CR-00337

Appellant, )

) SUMNER COUNTY

VS. )

) HON. JANE WHEATCRAFT,

STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) JUDGE

)

Appellee. ) (Writ of error coram nobis)

FOR THE APPELLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE:

JOHN L. GOODWIN, III, pro se JOHN KNOX WALKUP

S.T.S.R.C.F. Unit 12 Attorney General & Reporter

Route 4, Box 600

Pikeville, TN 37367 EUGENE J. HONEA

Asst. Attorney General

450 James Robertson Pkwy.

Nashville, TN 37243-0493

LAWRENCE RAY WHITLEY

District Attorney General

DEE GAY

Asst. District Attorney General

133 West Main St.

Gallatin, TN 37066

OPINION FILED:____________________

AFFIRMED

JOHN H. PEAY,

Judge
2

O P I N I O N

The petitioner was convicted on December 12, 1989, of second-degree

burglary and assault with intent to rape. No appeal was taken. Upon his petition for postconviction relief and appeal from the trial court’s dismissal thereof, he was granted a

delayed direct appeal from his convictions and sentences by this Court on November 12,

1992. On April 20, 1995, this Court affirmed his convictions and remanded for

resentencing. Following the petitioner’s appeal of his new sentences, this Court affirmed

on July 23, 1997. On June 4, 1996, the petitioner filed his “Application for Coram Nobis

and/or in the Alternative to Reopen Original Post-Conviction Petition.” On June 12, 1996,

the court below dismissed this pleading without a filed response from the State or a

hearing. The petitioner now appeals.

We affirm. Petitions for writ of error coram nobis must be filed within one

year after the judgment becomes final. T.C.A. § 27-7-103 (Repl. 1980). See also T.C.A.

§ 40-26-105 (Repl. 1990). In this matter, the defendant’s judgment of convictions

became final on April 20, 1995. Since his petition attacks only his convictions, the

petitioner’s application is time-barred. This issue is without merit.

The petitioner requests in the alternative that his pleading be considered

a motion to reopen his original petition for post-conviction relief. Motions to reopen postconviction petitions may be granted only under very limited grounds. See T.C.A. 

§ 40-30-217(a) (Supp. 1996). The instant pleading does not set forth any of these

grounds. Accordingly, denial is proper.
3

The judgment below is affirmed.

_________________________________

JOHN H. PEAY, Judge

CONCUR:

______________________________

WILLIAM M. BARKER, Judge

______________________________

JERRY L. SMITH, Judge
Wendolyn LEE, Petitioner, v. Amy P. WEIRICH, et al.

No. 19-5273

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Big Apple Ortho Products, Inc., as Assignee of Robinson, Eric, Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>Allstate Insurance Company, Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell of counsel), for appellant.Morrison Mahoney, LLP (Richard Montana of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Katherine A. Levine, J.), entered October 14, 2015. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is reversed, with $30 costs, and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied. </p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff had failed to appear for duly scheduled examinations under oath.</p><p>Plaintiff correctly argues on appeal that the affidavits submitted by defendant did not sufficiently set forth a standard office practice or procedure that would ensure that the denial of claim forms had been timely mailed (<i>see St. Vincent's Hosp. of Richmond v Government Empls. Ins. Co.</i>, 50 AD3d 1123 [2008]). As defendant did not demonstrate that it is not precluded from asserting its proffered defense, it is not entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>Accordingly, the order is reversed and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: May 25, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 98 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 98

    Urging the President to immediately request the resignation of 
              Secretary of Veterans Affairs Eric Shinseki.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 15, 2014

Mr. Farenthold submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
    Urging the President to immediately request the resignation of 
              Secretary of Veterans Affairs Eric Shinseki.

Whereas Secretary of Veterans Affairs Eric Shinseki is assigned to provide the 
        Nation's veterans the quality of care and benefits they deserve and have 
        earned;
Whereas Secretary Shinseki's poor oversight and failed leadership has led to the 
        tragic and avoidable deaths of some of the Nation's veterans;
Whereas officials of the Department of Veterans Affairs revealed inexcusable 
        delays in providing emergency health care to the Nation's veterans;
Whereas Secretary Shinseki has shown ineffectiveness and a lack of transparency 
        as the top official at the Department of Veterans Affairs;
Whereas the clerks at the Department of Veterans Affairs were instructed how to 
        falsify appointment records to meet agency goals;
Whereas Secretary Shinseki has displayed an unwillingness or inability to change 
        the culture of falsifying documents at the Department of Veterans 
        Affairs;
Whereas Secretary Shinseki has failed to implement modern age technology to 
        reduce backlogs in veterans' claims;
Whereas reports indicate that the Department of Veterans Affairs has paid out 
        more than $200,000,000 in wrongful-death claims to the families of 
        nearly 1,000 veterans since September 11, 2001; and
Whereas veterans have earned the right to have timely access to quality 
        healthcare: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress urges the President, in light of these aforementioned 
failures, to immediately request the resignation of Veterans Affairs 
Secretary Eric Shinseki.
                                 <all>
```
Albert T. ROBLES, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-912.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# C_2017089EN.01001801.xml

| 22.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/18

---

Notice for the attention of the persons to whom restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/172/CFSP, as amended by Decision (CFSP) 2017/496, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Egypt apply

(2017/C 89/03)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons who appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/172/CFSP (1) and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 (2) concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Egypt.

1

2

The Council of the European Union has determined that the persons that appear in the abovementioned Annexes should continue to be included in the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2011/172/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 270/2011.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 270/2011, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the abovementioned lists should be reconsidered. They should be presented before 15 December 2017 to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 63.

1

(2)  OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 4.

2

---
IN RE Jonathan A. HAMPTON, Petitioner.

No. 19-8026.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 6, 2020

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the Report) of CM Credit Opportunities
BDC I Inc. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Rocco DelGuercio, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



/s/    Rocco
DelGuercioName:

Rocco DelGuercioDate:

September 4, 2018
David R. BOSCH, petitioner, v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE.

No. 18-413.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One denied.
# C_2017421EN.01002102.xml

| 8.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/21

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2017/C 421/17)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 7.10.2017 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 7.10.2017-31.12.2017 |
| Member State | Estonia |
| Stock or Group of stocks | COD/N3M. |
| Species | Cod (Gadus morhua) |
| Zone | NAFO 3M |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 30/TQ127 |

Date and time of closure

7.10.2017

Duration

7.10.2017-31.12.2017

Member State

Estonia

Stock or Group of stocks

COD/N3M.

Species

Cod (Gadus morhua)

Gadus morhua

Zone

NAFO 3M

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

30/TQ127

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
III 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 103 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 28, 2014 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District 

of Columbia Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HCON 103 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF CAPITOL 

2 GROUNDS FOR D.C. SPECIAL OLYMPICS LAW 

3 ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN. 

4 On October 3, 2014, or on such other date as the 

5 Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Com6 mittee on Rules and Administration of the Senate may 

7 jointly designate, the 29th annual District of Columbia 

8 Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this 

9 resolution referred to as the ‘‘event’’) may be run through 

10 the Capitol Grounds to carry the Special Olympics torch 

11 to honor local Special Olympics athletes. 

12 SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD. 

13 The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as 

14 may be necessary to carry out the event. 

15 SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARA16 TIONS. 

17 The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions 

18 for physical preparations for the event. 

19 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

20 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce21 ment of the restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of 

22 title 40, United States Code, concerning sales, advertise23 ments, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HCON 103 RDS 

1 as well as other restrictions applicable to the Capitol 

2 Grounds, in connection with the event. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 25, 2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 11

                               G&L Realty Corp.
                       Computation of Per Share Earnings
                         Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
                                March 31, 1999
                     (In thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            Three Months Ended
                                                                March 31,
                                                           -------------------
                                                            1999         1998
                                                           ------       ------
<S>                                                        <C>          <C>
Net Income                                                 $1,651       $2,366
                                                                   
Less: Preferred Dividends                                          
 10.25% Series A Cumulative Preferred                        (958)        (958)
   9.8% Series B Cumulative Preferred                        (845)        (845)
                                                           ------       ------
Net (loss) income available to common shareholders         $ (152)      $  563
                                                           ======       ====== 
Options outstanding                                           214          198
                                                           ======       ======
Weighted average exercise price                            $14.49       $14.00
                                                           ======       ======
Proceeds upon exercise of options                          $3,094       $2,772
                                                           ======       ======
Treasury stock shares                                         197          153
                                                           ======       ======
Common share equivalents                                       18           45
Average shares outstanding                                  3,976        4,129
                                                           ------       ------ 
Total common and common share equivalents outstanding       3,994        4,174
                                                           ======       ======
Per share earnings data:                                           
------------------------                                           
                                                                   
Basic                                                      $(0.04)      $ 0.14
                                                           ======       ======
Fully diluted                                              $(0.04)      $ 0.13
                                                           ======       ======
</TABLE>
----

|   | (i) | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: November 16, 2009 |   |   | /s/ Francis M. DiNuzzo                    |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|                    |   |   | Francis M. DiNuzzoChief Executive Officer |
OII_Exhibit 10.01_03.31.2012








Exhibit 10.01


OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL, INC. 2012 ANNUAL CASH BONUS AWARD PROGRAM




On February 24, 2012, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the "Compensation Committee") of Oceaneering International, Inc. (the "Company") approved the 2012 Annual Cash Bonus Award Programs (a) for Executive Officers of the Company and (b) for all other participating employees, each under the 2010 Incentive Plan of the Company.  In the case of Executive Officers, cash bonuses are based on the level of achievement of net income for the Company in 2012 ("Net Income") as compared to planned results approved by the Compensation Committee (100% of award).  In the case of all other participating employees: (a) with respect to corporate employee participants, cash bonuses are based upon level of achievement as compared to planned results of: (i) Net Income (80% of award) and (ii) Individual Goals (20% of award); (b) with respect to profit center executives, cash bonuses are based on the level of achievement as compared to planned results of: (i) Net Income (50% of award), and (ii) goals of the executive’s profit center (50% of award), which profit center percentage amount is comprised of the level of achievement as compared to planned results of the following:  operating income of the profit center (70%), HSE goals (10%), objectives for the profit center (10%), and objectives for Continuous Quality Improvement ("CQI") (10%); and (c) for all other participating employees, based upon the level of achievement as compared to planned results of: (i) Net Income (25% of award), (ii) goals of the participant’s profit center (60%, which is comprised of the same elements as for profit center executives), and (iii) Individual Goals (15%).  The Compensation Committee has discretion to award a lower amount under the program than that amount which is otherwise determined under the terms of the program.









For each participant under each of these programs, the maximum cash award achievable is an approved  percentage of the participant’s annual base salary (in US Dollars) as of January 31, 2012 or such other approved date.  A participant must be employed by the Company or a subsidiary, or a member of the Board of Directors of the Company at the time the cash awards are approved for payment to receive a cash award.
Shua TILAHUN, Petitioner, v. Jeff PREMO, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary.

No. 18-9533

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Oregon denied.
Exhibit 32.1


 Statement of Chief Executive Officer of Safety Components International, Inc.
   Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to ss. 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



      In connection with the Annual Report of Safety Components International,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, John C. Corey, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


/s/ John C. Corey
-------------------------------------
John C. Corey
Chief Executive Officer and President
March 10, 2005


The foregoing statement is being furnished to accompany Safety Components
International, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2004 (the "Report") solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not be deemed filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any
other filing of Safety Components International, Inc. that incorporates the
Report by reference. A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to Safety Components International, Inc. and will
be retained by Safety Components International, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
United States District Court

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

MICHAEL DESHUN HOLLAND, JR. (1) 

§

§

§

§

§

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 4:23-CR-00266-

ALM-AGD

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the above-referenced criminal action, the Court having 

heretofore referred the request for the revocation of Defendant’s supervised release to the United 

States Magistrate Judge for proper consideration. The Court has received the Report and 

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to its order. With Defendant 

having waived allocution before the Court as well as his right to object to the report of the 

Magistrate Judge, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate 

Judge are correct. 

It is therefore ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States 

Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. 

It is further ORDERED that Defendant’s supervised release is hereby REVOKED. 

It is further ORDERED that Defendant be committed to the custody of the Bureau of 

Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of eight (8) months, with a twenty-four (24) month term of 

supervised release to follow. 

The Court also recommends that Defendant be housed at a Bureau of Prisons facility in 

Seagoville, Texas, if appropriate.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case 4:23-cr-00266-ALM-KPJ Document 18 Filed 05/31/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 77