alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Form of Restricted Stock United Kingdom Award



 Exhibit 10.9 
 Date 
 [Name] 
 Global ID Number: XXX-XX-[XXX] 
 Dear [First Name]: 

Effective [Date], the Board of Directors of Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) awarded you the following Restricted Stock at a grant
value of $X,XX per share upon the terms set forth below: 
  

			
	Type of Grant:	 	Restricted Stock
	Number of Shares:	 	[# of Shares]
	Vesting Schedule:	 	Vesting schedule

 This Restricted Stock Award (this “Award”) has been granted pursuant to, and is controlled by: (i) the
Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. Inducement Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); (ii) the Restricted Stock Terms and Conditions (the “Plan Terms”); and (iii) this Award. This Award shall vest as set forth above. The Plan and the
Plan Terms are incorporated into this Award as if fully set forth herein. 
 By accepting this award, you agree that any income tax and employee
National Insurance arising on the vesting or delivery of stock under this Award MUST BE MADE GOOD to the Company within 90 days of the delivery of the stock, this may be by any method of as described in section 7 of the Plan Terms, by cash or by
cheque (as the Company may in its sole discretion determine). You also agree to be bound by all the terms and conditions of the Plan, the Plan Terms (including the UK appendix) and this letter. 

You should consult your own tax advisor for your individual tax situation. 
 All documents relating to this award are available for viewing and printing on the Human Resources Department Website. To access this information, please go to MyNet, select Directory, Site Directory,
Human Resources, Stock Administration. The documents available for viewing and printing at this website location are the Plan, the Plan Terms, the most recent Plan Prospectus, the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and the
Company’s Insider Trading Policy. If you choose not to download these documents, if you do not have access to MyNet or if you encounter problems accessing this site, please contact Stock Administration at (949) 579-4525 or
stock.admin@mindspeed.com to receive paper copies of these documents at no cost. Please read all documents carefully. 
 If you
have any questions regarding this grant, please contact Stock Administration at (949) 579-4525 or via email at stock.admin@mindspeed.com. 
 MINDSPEED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CEO CERTIFICATION**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.Sec.1350, as adopted), Patrick O’Dea, the Chief Executive Officer of Peet’s Coffee & Tea, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge: 

1. The Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “AnnualReport” ) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 

2. Theinformation contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 30th day of March, 2007.
# C_2017187EN.01000301.xml

| 13.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/3

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 329/2007 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea apply

(2017/C 187/03)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EC) No 329/2007 (2).

2

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 329/2007.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil the listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (3).

3

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 88, 29.3.2007, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

3

---
No. 6:23-cv-00506

Justin Ray Abbott,

Plaintiff,

v.

Kilgore Police Department et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

Plaintiff Justin Ray Abbott, an inmate of the Gregg County Jail

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights lawsuit 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to United States 

Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). 

Doc. 3. 

On October 30, 2023, the magistrate judge submitted a report 

recommending that plaintiff’s claims against the Kilgore Police Department be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief 

can be granted. Doc. 5. Plaintiff’s other claims are proceeding as instructed by separate order. Doc. 6. A copy of the report was mailed 

to the plaintiff, who has not filed an objection within the time permitted.

When no party objects to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass 

v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satisfied that it 

contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation. All claims against the Kilgore Police Department are dismissed from this suit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b).

Case 6:23-cv-00506-JCB-KNM Document 20 Filed 12/04/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 69
- 2 -

So ordered by the court on December 4, 2023.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cv-00506-JCB-KNM Document 20 Filed 12/04/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 70
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DANNY A. HILLMAN, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:24-CV-21

§

MICHELLE HILLMAN, et al., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Danny A. Hillman, an inmate confined at the Wainwright Unit of the Texas

Department of Criminal Justice, CorrectionalInstitutions Division, proceeding pro se, brought this

lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack

Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to

applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge recommends dismissing the action

without prejudice. To date, the parties have not filed objections to the report.

The court received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available

evidence. After careful review, the court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of

the United States Magistrate Judge are correct.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is

ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate

judge’s recommendation.

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 2nd day of May, 2024.

Case 9:24-cv-00021-MAC-ZJH Document 8 Filed 05/02/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 90
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 121 Received in Senate (RDS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 121

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 8, 2014

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for a correction in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 3979.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 3979, the Clerk of the House of 
Representatives shall correct the title so as to read: ``An Act to 
authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2015 for military activities 
of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for 
defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe mili- 

              

tary personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other 
purposes.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 4, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Brad SMITH, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9708

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
# C_2019433EN.01021601.xml

| 23.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 433/216 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 433/216

---

P8_TA(2018)0320

Implementing decision on subjecting the new psychoactive substances cyclopropylfentanyl and methoxyacetylfentanyl to control measures *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 11 September 2018 on the draft Council implementing decision on subjecting the new psychoactive substances N-phenyl-N-[1-(2-phenylethyl)piperidin-4-yl]cyclopropanecarboxamide (cyclopropylfentanyl) and 2-methoxy-N-phenyl-N-[1-(2-phenylethyl)piperidin-4-yl]acetamide (methoxyacetylfentanyl) to control measures (09420/2018 – C8-0278/2018 – 2018/0118(NLE))

(Consultation)

(2019/C 433/27)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the Council draft (09420/2018), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Council draft (09420/2018),

| — | having regard to Article 39(1) of the Treaty on European Union, as amended by the Treaty of Amsterdam, and Article 9 of Protocol No 36 on transitional provisions, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0278/2018), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 39(1) of the Treaty on European Union, as amended by the Treaty of Amsterdam, and Article 9 of Protocol No 36 on transitional provisions, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0278/2018),

| — | having regard to Council Decision 2005/387/JHA of 10 May 2005 on the information exchange, risk-assessment and control of new psychoactive substances (1), and in particular Article 8(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Council Decision 2005/387/JHA of 10 May 2005 on the information exchange, risk-assessment and control of new psychoactive substances (1), and in particular Article 8(3) thereof,

| — | having regard to Rule 78c of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 78c of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0271/2018), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0271/2018),

| 1. | Approves the Council draft; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

2.

| 3. | Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

3.

| 4. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

4.

---

(1)  OJ L 127, 20.5.2005, p. 32.

---
Donnie MORGAN, Warden, Petitioner, v. Vincent D. WHITE, Jr.

No. 19-1023.

Supreme Court of the United States.

June 1, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Miguel RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7835.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 6, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
```

```

----

Updated March 7, 2014
Irma ROSAS, Petitioner v. ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF CHICAGO

No. 19-25

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 10.23

                              PROMISSORY TERM NOTE

$50,000                                                      DECEMBER  08,  2003

     FOR  VALUE RECEIVED, H.E.R.C. PRODUCTS INCORPORATED, a Delaware Corporation
("Maker"),  promises  to  pay  to  R.  JOHN  ARMSTRONG ("Holder"), or order, the
principal sum of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000), together with interest on the
                 --------------------------------
unpaid  portion  thereof  from date until paid at the rate of eight percent (8%)
per  annum  from  December  08,  2003,  on  or  before June 8, 2004, as follows:
                  -------------------                  ------------

     Maker  shall  make payment in lawful money of the United States of America.

     This  Note  may  be  prepaid  in  whole or in part, without penalty, at the
option  of  Maker  and  without  the  consent  of  Holder.

     This  Note is nonrecourse as to Maker and is made without the pledge of any
security  interest  in  the  property,  realty  or  personalty,  of  Maker.

This  note  may  be  renewed  or  extended under terms agreed to by the parties.

The  Maker  agrees that in case of the event of default in payment of this Note,
and  it is placed in the hands of an attorney for collection, or suit is brought
on  the  same,  or  same is collected through Probate or Bankruptcy proceedings,
then  an additional amount of ten percent (10%) on the principal and interest of
this  Note  shall  be  added  to  the  same  as  collection  fees.

     The  laws  of  the  State  of Virginia excluding its conflict of laws rules
shall govern this Note. The exclusive jurisdiction and venue of any legal action
instituted  by  any  party  to  this  Note  shall  be  Norfolk,  Virginia.

     MAKER:

III.     H.E.R.C.  PRODUCTS  INCORPORATED
     (a  Delaware  Corporation)


     By:     /s/  S.  Steven  Carl
          ------------------------
          S.  Steven  Carl
          Chief  Executive  Officer


     HOLDER:

     R.  JOHN  ARMSTRONG

         /s/  R.  John  Armstrong
     ----------------------------


<PAGE>
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Eastern District of Texas

COMMUNICATION INTERFACE TECHNOLOGIES 

LLC,

4:24-cv-17

Great Clips, Inc.

Great Clips, Inc. 

c/o its Registered Agent 

NATIONAL REGISTERED AGENTS, INC. 

1209 ORANGE STREET 

WILMINGTON, DE 19801

Trevor Beaty 

BEATY LEGAL PLLC 

514 North Elm Street 

Sherman, Texas 75090 

1/9/2024

Case 4:24-cv-00017-SDJ Document 4 Filed 01/09/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 213
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

4:24-cv-17 0.00 Print Save As... Reset

Case 4:24-cv-00017-SDJ Document 4 Filed 01/09/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 214
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21



                                G&L Realty Corp.
                              List of Subsidiaries
                                 July 31, 1998


1.   AV Medical Associates, LLC, a California limited liability company
2.   G&L Hampden, Inc., a Delaware corporation
3.   G&L Hampden, LLC a Delaware limited liability company
4.   G&L Realty Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
5.   G&L Realty Financing II, Inc., a Delaware corporation
6.   G&L Realty Financing Partnership II, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
7.   G&L Medical, Inc., a Delaware corporation
8.   G&L Gardens, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company
9.   G&L Management Delaware Corp., a Delaware corporation
10.  G&L Senior Care, Inc., a Delaware corporation
11.  G&L Medical Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
12.  GLN Capital Co. LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
13.  GL/PHP, LLC a Delaware limited liability company
14.  Theme World, L.P., a New Jersey limited partnership
15.  Valley Convalescent, LLC, a California limited liability company
16.  435 N. Roxbury Drive, Ltd., a California limited partnership
17.  G&L/M&Z Aliso Partners, a California general partnership
18.  G&L - Grabel San Pedro, LLC
19.  G&L Burbank, LLC
20.  G&L Burbank Managers Corp., a California coporation
21.  G&L Holy Cross, LLC
22.  G&L Holy Cross Managers Corp., a California corporation
23.  G&L Tustin, LLC
24.  G&L Tustin Managers Corp., a California corporation
25.  G&L Valencia, LLC
26.  G&L Penasquitos, LLC
27.  G&L Penasquitos, Inc.
28.  GLH Pacific Gardens, LLC
29.  GLH Pacific Gardens Corp., a California corporation
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 21

                                G&L Realty Corp.
                              List of Subsidiaries
                                October 31, 1998


1.   AV Medical Associates, LLC, a California limited liability company
2.   G&L Hampden, Inc., a Delaware corporation
3.   G&L Hampden, LLC a Delaware limited liability company
4.   G&L Realty Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
5.   G&L Realty Financing II, Inc., a Delaware corporation
6.   G&L Realty Financing Partnership II, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
7.   G&L Medical, Inc., a Delaware corporation
8.   G&L Gardens, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company
9.   G&L Management Delaware Corp., a Delaware corporation
10.  G&L Senior Care, Inc., a Delaware corporation
11.  G&L Medical Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
12.  GLN Capital Co. LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
13.  GL/PHP, LLC a Delaware limited liability company
14.  Theme World, L.P., a New Jersey limited partnership
15.  Valley Convalescent, LLC, a California limited liability company
16.  435 N. Roxbury Drive, Ltd., a California limited partnership
17.  G&L/M&Z Aliso Partners, a California general partnership
18.  G&L - Grabel San Pedro, LLC
19.  G&L Burbank, LLC
20.  G&L Burbank Managers Corp., a California corporation
21.  G&L Holy Cross, LLC
22.  G&L Holy Cross Managers Corp., a California corporation
23.  G&L Tustin, LLC
24.  G&L Tustin Managers Corp., a California corporation
25.  G&L Valencia, LLC
26.  G&L Penasquitos, LLC
27.  G&L Penasquitos, Inc.
28.  GLH Pacific Gardens, LLC
29.  GLH Pacific Gardens Corp., a California corporation
30.  G&L Hoquiam, LLC
Victor O. JONES, Jr., Petitioner, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.

No. 19-7339.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.