alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

I,  James L. Holbrook, Jr., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of EMAK Worldwide, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information related to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

 

 
|   |   |   | /s/ James L. Holbrook, Jr.                                                     |
|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   | James L. Holbrook, Jr.

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer) |

 

 

Dated: August 22, 2006
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v.

PAUL THOMAS BRINSON,

§

§

§

§ CASE NUMBER 4:23-MJ-00531-KPJ

§

§

§

WAIVER OF RULE 5 & 5.1 HEARINGS

(Complaint or Indictment)

I understand that I have been charged in another district, the District of Columbia.

I have been informed of the char es and of my rights to:

(1) Retain counsel or request the assignment of counsel if I am unable to retain counsel;

(2) An identity hearing to determine whether I am the person named in the charges;

(3) Production of the warrant, a certified copy of the warrant, or a reliable electronic copy of

either;

(4) A preliminary hearing within 14 days of my first appearance if I am in custody and 21 days

otherwise - unless I am indicted - to determine whether there is a probable cause to believe

that an offense has been committed;

(5) A hearing on any motion by the government for detention;

(6) Request transfer of the proceedings to this district under Fed. R. Crim. P. 20, to plead

guilty.

I agree to waiver my right(s) to:

an identity hearing and production of the warrant.

a preliminary hearing.

a detention hearing.

an identity hearing, production of the judgment, warrant, and warrant application, and any

preliminary or detention hearing to which I may be entitled in this district.

1 request that my preliminary hearing and/or detention hearing be held in the prosecuting

district, at a time set by that court.

Date/Oct ber 10, 2023.

I consent to the issuance of an order requiring my appearance in the prosecuting district

where the charges are pending against me.

Defendant Signature of defendant s attorney

Case 4:23-mj-00531-KPJ Document 4 Filed 10/10/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 24
Independent Auditors' Report


To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
the Managed Assets Trust:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements
of the Managed Assets Trust (the Fund) for the year ended
December 31, 2001, we considered its internal control, including
control activities for safeguarding securities, in order to
determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing
our opinion on the financial statements and to comply with the
requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on the
internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Those controls include the safeguarding of assets against
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, error or
fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any
evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to
the risk that it may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in the internal control that might be
material weaknesses under standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness
is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of
the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively
low level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in
amounts that would be material in relation to the financial
statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a
timely period by employees in the normal course of performing
their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters involving
the internal control and its operation, including controls for
safeguarding securities that we consider to be material
weaknesses as defined above as of December 31, 2001.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management, the Board of Trustees of the Fund, and the Securities
and Exchange Commission and is not intended to be and should not
be used by anyone other than these specified parties.



New York, New York
February 8, 2002
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4650-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the State of Washington (FEMA-4650-DR), dated March 29, 2022, and related determinations.

# DATES:

The amendment was issued May 17, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this declared disaster is now December 26, 2021, through and including January 15, 2022.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2022-11920 Filed 6-2-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20E0025. IN THE INTEREST OF B.M.R., A CHILD (MOTHER)

Pursuant to Court of Appeals Rule 40 (b), the mother of B. M. R. has filed an

emergency motion requesting a second thirty (30) day extension of time to file an

application for discretionary appeal in this matter. The mother’s motion is hereby

DENIED. See OCGA § 5-3-39 (a) (5), (c).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

January 05, 2021

01/05/2021
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

JUAN NUNEZ §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24-CV-50

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL. § 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Juan Nunez, a prisoner confined at the United States Penitentiary in Beaumont,

Texas, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act.

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate

Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court.

On November 4, 2024, the magistrate judge recommended dismissing the action without prejudice

for want of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). To date, the parties have

not filed objections to the report and recommendation.

The Court received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available

evidence. After careful review, the Court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of

the United States Magistrate Judge are correct. 

Case 1:24-cv-00050-MJT-ZJH Document 8 Filed 12/13/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 26
ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct,

and the report of the magistrate judge [Dkt. 7] is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in

accordance with this memorandum order.

2

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 13th day of December, 2024.

Case 1:24-cv-00050-MJT-ZJH Document 8 Filed 12/13/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 27
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES,

v.

AT&T SERVICES INC.; AT&T MOBILITY LLC; 

AND AT&T CORP.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00202-JRG-RSP

LEAD CASE

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES,

v.

VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; CELLCO 

PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS

CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00203-JRG-RSP

MEMBER CASE

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES,

v.

T-MOBILE USA, INC.

CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00204-JRG-RSP

MEMBER CASE

PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW OPPOSED

MOTION TO COMPEL

Before the Court is Plaintiff XR Communications, LLC dba Vivato Technologies 

(“Vivato” or “XR”) Motion to withdraw their Opposed Motion to Compel (“Motion”) Dkt. 114. 

For good cause shown, the Court finds that Vivato’s Motion is hereby GRANTED.

Case 2:23-cv-00202-JRG-RSP Document 117-1 Filed 12/06/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID

#: 3322
Michael Roman BURGHARDT, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7705.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6669

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JUDITH L. MILLER, Defendant - Appellant, and GROUP TRIPS UNLIMITED, INCORPORATED, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CR-02-95, CA-03-504-A) Submitted: July 10, 2003 Decided: July 16, 2003 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Collins Brennan, Jr., Upper Marlboro, Maryland; Frank Salvato, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Jack I. Hanly, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Judith L. Miller seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that her constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Miller has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and di smiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

VIRTAMOVE, CORP.,

Plaintiff,

v. 

HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE 

COMPANY,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-CV-00093-JRG

(LEAD CASE)

v. 

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS 

MACHINES CORP.,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-CV-00094-JRG

(MEMBER CASE)

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company’s (“HPE”) Motion to 

Extend Deadline to Respond to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 

44.) In the Motion, HPE requests that the deadline for HPE to respond to Plaintiff’s First Amended 

Complaint be extended from May 28, 2024 to June 7, 2024 “[g]iven the federal holiday and the 

schedules of counsel.” (Id.) The Motion is unopposed. (Id.) 

Having considered the Motion, and noting that it is unopposed, the Court finds that the 

Motion should be and hereby is GRANTED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the deadline for 

HPE to respond to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint is extended up to and including June 7, 

2024. 

Case 2:24-cv-00093-JRG Document 45 Filed 05/28/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 365
2 

____________________________________

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 28th day of May, 2024.

Case 2:24-cv-00093-JRG Document 45 Filed 05/28/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 366
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 8, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 34905]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12346]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Open Grid Alliance, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on May 20, 2022, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Open Grid Alliance, Inc. 
(``OGA'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Accedian Networks, Inc., St-Laurent, CANADA; Arrcus Inc., 
San Jose, CA; Crown Castle Fiber LLC, Houston, TX; Ecole de technologie 
superieure (ETS), University of Quebec, CANADA; Highway9 Networks, 
Saratoga, CA; Macrometa Corporation, San Mateo, CA; Menya Solutions 
Inc., Quebec, CANADA; STARaCom Research Center, Montreal, CANADA; and 
Universite de Sherbrooke, Quebec City, CANADA, have been added as 
parties to this venture.
    Also, ITRenew, Newark, CA, has withdrawn as a party to this 
venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and OGA intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On March 31, 2022, OGA filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on May 12, 
2022 (87 FR 29180).

Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2022-12346 Filed 6-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
# C_2017299EN.01001801.xml

| 9.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 299/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 299/18

---

Corrigendum to Commission communication pursuant to Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 280 of 24 August 2017
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 280 of 24 August 2017

(2017/C 299/09)

| (1) | On cover page and on page 2, the title should read as follows: |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On cover page and on page 2, the title should read as follows:

‘Commission communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations’.

| (2) | On page 2, in the table: |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On page 2, in the table:

for:

for:

‘Invitation to tender and related documentation may be obtained at: www.etenders.ie’,

read:

read:

‘Invitation to tender and related documentation may be obtained at: www.etenders.gov.ie’.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AVONDALE INCORPORATED FOR THE
THIRTY-NINE WEEKS ENDED MAY 28, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-28-1999
<CASH>                                           8,002
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,807
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,856
<INVENTORY>                                    132,460
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               182,800
<PP&E>                                         560,118
<DEPRECIATION>                                (299,047)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 462,680
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           73,060
<BONDS>                                        247,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           127
<OTHER-SE>                                     102,679
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   462,680
<SALES>                                        651,629
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               651,629
<CGS>                                          558,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  618,718
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,756
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   962
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,510
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,645
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,080
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,565
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,565
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .51


</TABLE>