alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

STEPHANIE BROWN, individually and on §

behalf of all others similarly situated, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24-CV-16

§

PREMIER HEALTH SOLUTIONS, LLC, §

§

Defendant. §

ORDER OF TRANSFER

Before the court is a civil action in which Plaintiff Stephanie Brown (“Brown”),

individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, has sued Defendant Premier Health

Solutions, LLC (“Premier”). Brown contends that Premier violated both the Telephone Consumer

Protection Act and the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act by making multiple telemarketing calls

to her after she had placed her phone number on the National Do Not Call Registry and had not

otherwise consented to such contact. The facts of this case, however, reveal no nexus to the

Beaumont Division of the Eastern District of Texas. Brown is a citizen of Florida, and she stated

in her complaint that at least one of the offending phone calls that she received was from an

individual working in Frisco, Texas, which is partially located in Collin County, Texas. Indeed,

at the scheduling conference on April 30, 2024, counsel for Premier noted that Premier is located

in Collin County, Texas, within the Sherman Division, and both counsel for Brown and Premier

consented to an intradistrict transfer to the Sherman Division. The court is thus of the opinion that

an intradistrict transfer to the Sherman Division is appropriate. 

Case 1:24-cv-00016-MAC Document 13 Filed 05/01/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 101
Accordingly, this case is TRANSFERRED to the Sherman Division of the Eastern District

of Texas and the Clerk of Court is ORDERED to assign a new case number denoting the Sherman

Division. 

2

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 1st day of May, 2024.

Case 1:24-cv-00016-MAC Document 13 Filed 05/01/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 102
**Exhibit 10.41**

 

**COMPENSATIONOF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF BIOSPHERE MEDICAL, INC.**

 

As of March 29, 2005, the following sets forththe compensation of the executive officers of BioSphere Medical, Inc. (“BioSphere”):

 
| **Executive Officer**                      | ** ** | **Current Annual  Salary** | ** ** | **2004 Bonus** | ** ** | **Other  Compensation (1)** | ** ** |
|--------------------------------------------|------------|----------------------------|------------|----------------|------------|-----------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                 | ** ** | ** **                 | ** ** | ** **     | ** ** | ** **                  | ** ** |
| Richard J. Faleschini                      |       |                       |       |           |       |                        |       |
| President and Chief Executive Officer      |       | $                          | 300,000    |           | —     |                        | $          | 397 |   |
|                                       |       |                       |       |           |       |                        |       |
| Martin J. Joyce                            |       |                       |       |           |       |                        |       |
| Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |       | $                          | 190,000    |           | —     |                        | —     |   |
|                                       |       |                       |       |           |       |                        |       |
| Peter C. Sutcliffe                         |       |                       |       |           |       |                        |       |
| Vice President, Manufacturing              |       | $                          | 183,361    |           | —     |                        | $          | 3,596 |   |
|                                       |       |                       |       |           |       |                        |       |
| Gary M. Saxton                             |       |                       |       |           |       |                        |       |
| Senior Vice President and General Manager  |       | $                          | 223,000    |           | —     |                        | $          | 194 |   |

 

----

(1) Represents the amounts of matching contributionsmade by BioSphere to the Retirement Savings Plan and the taxable portion ofgroup life insurance.

 

In addition, each of BioSphere’s executive officers iseligible to participate in BioSphere’s 1997 Stock Incentive Plan and anysuccessor plan.

 

----
Carlos J. AVENA, Petitioner, v. Kevin CHAPPELL, Warden.

No. 19-6562

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 14

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-15 Filed 09/27/23 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 225
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-15 Filed 09/27/23 Page 2 of 9 PageID #: 2
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-15 Filed 09/27/23 Page 3 of 9 PageID #: 2
Page 3 

1[c] monitoring a volume of data used by the user over the network regardless of which of a plurality of devices the user uses to access the at least one of the plurality of network switches; 

T-Mobile provides a network switch that monitors high-speed data vo

network regardless of which device is used to access the network switSource: https://www.t-mobile.com/support/account/check-your-usage 

Source: https://prepaid.t-mobile.com/prepaid-plans 

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-15 Filed 09/27/23 Page 4 of 9 PageID #: 2
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-15 Filed 09/27/23 Page 5 of 9 PageID #: 2
Page 5 

1[d] controlling the communication of user data on the network by permitting said communication of user data through the plurality of switches while the volume of data used by the user is within the data volume allowance for the user, and; 

T-Mobile permits communication over the network of high-speed data 

switches while the high-speed data volume is within the data volume aSource: https://prepaid.t-mobile.com/prepaid-plans Source: https://www.t-mobile.com/support/plans-features/mobile-inte

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-15 Filed 09/27/23 Page 6 of 9 PageID #: 2
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-15 Filed 09/27/23 Page 7 of 9 PageID #: 2
Page 7 

1[e] preventing said communication of user data if the volume of data used by the user reaches or exceeds the data volume allowance for the user. 

T-Mobile prevents the communication of high-speed data (user data) w

data volume exceeds the high-speed data volume allowance for the usSource: https://prepaid.t-mobile.com/prepaid-plans Source: https://www.t-mobile.com/support/plans-features/mobile-inte

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-15 Filed 09/27/23 Page 8 of 9 PageID #: 2
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-15 Filed 09/27/23 Page 9 of 9 PageID #: 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2754

ANTONIO A. GUTLIFFE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SHIRLEY S. CHATER, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Chief

District Judge. (CA-95-123-7-F2)

Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: June 26, 1997

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antonio A. Gutliffe, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Dickerson Kocher,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order affirming a decision of the Commissioner of Social Security to deny a waiver to

recovery of an overpayment of disability benefits. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Gutliffe v. Chater, Comm’r Soc. Sec., No. CA-95-123-7-F2 (E.D.N.C.

Oct. 24, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of President and Executive Vice President Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of LBI Media Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Jose Liberman, as President of the Company, and Lenard D. Liberman, as Executive Vice President of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/S/    JOSE LIBERMANJose LibermanPresidentAugust 15, 2005




By:

/S/    LENARD D. LIBERMANLenard D. LibermanExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerAugust 15, 2005




This certification accompanies
the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
AO 120 (Rev. 08/10) 

TO: Mail Stop 8

Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

P.O. Box 1450

Alexandria, VA 22313-1450

REPORT ON THE

FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN

ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR

TRADEMARK

In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been

filed in the U.S. District Court on the following

Trademarks or Patents. ( the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):

DOCKET NO. DATE FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT

PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:

DATE INCLUDED INCLUDED BY

Amendment Answer Cross Bill Other Pleading

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:

DECISION/JUDGEMENT

CLERK (BY) DEPUTY CLERK DATE

Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director

Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy

Case 2:24-cv-00080-JRG Document 21 Filed 05/15/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 235
Exhibit 10.1


 


Derma Sciences, Inc.


 


2012 Director Compensation Program


 


The 2012 Director Compensation Program of
Derma Sciences, Inc. (the “Company”), effective May 1, 2012, applies to the Company’s directors upon election
or appointment to the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board of Directors”).


 


General Board of Directors Service -- Equity


 


		·	Upon election or appointment, outside directors receive options to purchase 15,000 shares of common stock of the Company (“Common
Stock”) at a price per share equal to the closing price of the Common Stock on the trading date immediately preceding the
option grant.



		·	For each year of service, outside directors, except for the lead director, receive (i) options to purchase 6,000 shares of
Common Stock at a price per share equal to the closing price of the Common Stock on the trading date immediately preceding the
option grant and (ii) 3,000 restricted stock units.



		·	For each year of service, the lead director receives (i) options to purchase 8,000 shares of Common Stock at a price per share
equal to the closing price of the Common Stock on the trading date immediately preceding the option grant and (ii) 4,000 restricted
stock units.



 


General Board of Directors Service – Cash


 


For each year of service, each outside director also receives
a $35,000 annual cash payment, payable quarterly in equal amounts, except for the lead director, who receives a $60,000 annual
cash payment, payable quarterly in equal amounts.


 


Committee Service


 


		·	The chairperson of the Audit Committee, the chairperson of the Compensation Committee and the chairperson of the Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee receive additional annual compensation of $12,000, $12,000 and $6,000, respectively, payable
quarterly in equal amounts.



		·	Each member of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receive
additional annual compensation of $4,000, $4,000 and $2,500, respectively, payable quarterly in equal amounts.






		·	In connection with special committees (in addition to those committees discussed previously) that the
Board of Directors may form from time to time in connection with various transactions or undertakings, the Board of Directors may
award compensation to the directors, in its discretion, for membership on such special committees.


 


 


Inside Directors


 


Inside directors receive no compensation for their services
as directors.


 


Expenses


 


All directors are reimbursed for expenses incurred in connection
with each Board of Directors and committee meeting attended.
BOSTON FINANCIAL TAX CREDIT FUND VIII, A Limited Partnership


                                 EXHIBIT [32.1]

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Financial Tax Credit Fund VIII
(the "Fund") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Executive Vice President, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.



                                                    /s/Jenny Netzer
                                                    Jenny Netzer
                                                    Executive Vice President
                                                    MMA Financial, LLC

                                                    Date:  February 14, 2005






A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

<PAGE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

MARK PARSONS,

Plaintiff,

v. 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 

SECURITY,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-324-MJT

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING 

DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO REVERSE AND REMAND

The Court ordered that this matter be referred to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, 

United States Magistrate Judge, for consideration pursuant to applicable law and orders of this 

Court. The Court received and considered the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge 

regarding Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Reverse and Remand. 

The Court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the United States 

Magistrate Judge are correct, and the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 

A Final Judgment will be entered separately, reversing and remanding this action to the 

Commissioner for rehearing and a de novo determination under the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. 

§ 405(g).

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 11th day of June, 2024.

Case 1:23-cv-00324-MJT-CLS Document 25 Filed 06/11/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 2124
| (logo)  ncb  National Cooperative Bank    | 2011  Crystal  Drive  Suite 800  Arlington, Virginia 22202 |
|------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**FORM OF ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

BANK2017-BNK8, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2017-BNK8 (the“Trust”)

 

I,Karyn Mann, on behalf of National Cooperative Bank, N.A. as NCB Master Servicer(the “Certifying Servicer”), certify to Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.and its officers, directors and affiliates, and with the knowledge and intentthat they will rely upon this certification, that:

 

1.            I (or Servicing Officers under my supervision) have reviewed the CertifyingServicer’s activities during the preceding calendar year between January 1,2017 and December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”) and the CertifyingServicer’s performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and

 

2.            To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certifying Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement inall material respects during the Reporting Period.

 

 

Date: February6, 2018

 

NATIONALCOOPERATIVE BANK, N.A.,

asNCB Master Servicer

 

 

 

 

By:/s/ Karyn Mann

Name:Karyn Mann

Title:Senior Vice President
III 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 58 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 5, 2013 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the need for 

the continued availability of religious services to members 

of the Armed Forces and their families during a lapse 

in appropriations. 

Whereas the Department of Defense has determined that 

some military chaplains and other personnel, including 

contract personnel, hired to perform duties of a military 

chaplain are not able to perform religious services on 

military installations during a lapse in appropriations; 

Whereas this determination threatens the ability of members 

of the Armed Services and their families to 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HCON 58 RDS 

exercise their First Amendment rights to worship and 

participate in religious activities; and 

Whereas the Department of the Interior has permitted the 

performance of First Amendment activities in areas controlled by the National Park Service despite the lapse in 

appropriations: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) recognizes that the performance of religious 

4 services and the provision of ministry are protected 

5 activities under the First Amendment of the United 

6 States Constitution; 

7 (2) urges and intends that the Secretary of De8 fense permit the performance of religious services on 

9 property owned or maintained by the Department of 

10 Defense, during any lapse in appropriations, in the 

11 same manner and to the same extent as such reli12 gious services are otherwise available; and 

13 (3) urges and intends that the Secretary of De14 fense permit military chaplains and other personnel, 

15 including contract personnel, hired to perform duties 

16 of a military chaplain to perform religious services 

17 and ministry, during any lapse in appropriations, in 

18 the same manner and to the same extent as such 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HCON 58 RDS 

1 chaplains and other personnel are otherwise per2 mitted to perform religious services and ministry. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 5, 

2013. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
 
                                                                EXHIBIT 10.30(d)

                                AMENDMENT NO. 3
                                      TO
                            VASTAR RESOURCES, INC.
                            EXECUTIVE DEFERRAL PLAN

                           ------------------------

Pursuant to the resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors on January 21, 
1998, the Vastar Resources, Inc. Executive Deferral Plan (the "Plan") is amended
effective as of January 1, 1998.

A new Section 9 is added to Article II to read as follows:

        "SECTION 9. SPECIAL AWARD DEFERRAL

        9.1 Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, a
        Participant's 1997 award from the Southern Company Energy Marketing,
        L.P. Incentive Plan shall be considered an Award and subject to such
        Participant's 1997 Deferral Commitment."

Executed This 30th day of January, 1998.

ATTEST:                                 VASTAR RESOURCES, INC.


BY: /s/ JONATHAN D. EDELFELT            BY: /s/ JEFFREY M. BENDER
   --------------------------              ------------------------
   JONATHAN D. EDELFELT                     JEFFREY M. BENDER
   Associate Secretary                      Vice President
                                            Human Resources
# C_2017048EN.01000401.xml

| 15.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/4

---

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1))

1

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 48/05)

Decisions granting an authorisation

Decisions granting an authorisation

| Reference of the decision (2) | Date of decision | Substance name | Holder of the authorisation | Authorisation number | Authorised use | Date of expiry of review period | Reasons for the decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C(2017) 651 | 8 February 2017 | Trichloroethylene
  EC No 201-167-4
  CAS No 79-01-6 | Chimcomplex S.A. Borzesti, 3 Industriilor Street, 601124, Onesti, Bacau, Romania | REACH/16/9/0 | Industrial use of trichloroethylene as a solvent as a degreasing agent in closed systems | 21 February 2019 | In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socioeconomic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment arising from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies in terms of their technical and economic feasibility. |

Reference of the decision (2)

2

Date of decision

Substance name

Holder of the authorisation

Authorisation number

Authorised use

Date of expiry of review period

Reasons for the decision

C(2017) 651

8 February 2017

Trichloroethylene

EC No 201-167-4

CAS No 79-01-6

Chimcomplex S.A. Borzesti, 3 Industriilor Street, 601124, Onesti, Bacau, Romania

REACH/16/9/0

Industrial use of trichloroethylene as a solvent as a degreasing agent in closed systems

21 February 2019

In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socioeconomic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment arising from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies in terms of their technical and economic feasibility.

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

1

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/chemicals/reach/about/index_en.htm

2

---