alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Second Amendment, dated 22 June 2011, to Supplemental Retirement Agreement



 Exhibit 4.41 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO 
 SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT AGREEMENT 

SECOND AMENDMENT made effective as of the twelve month anniversary of the date written below, to the
Supplemental Retirement Agreement (the “Supplemental Retirement Agreement”) made and entered into as of the
1st day of July, 2008, by and between WPP Group USA, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation, and Paul Richardson (the “Executive”). 
 WHEREAS, as of the date written
below, the Executive elects to change the date on which payment of his Deferral Account Balance commences in accordance with Section 6(c) of the Supplemental Retirement Agreement; 

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, the parties hereto agree that the
Supplemental Retirement Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 
 1.     Section 6(a)
of the Supplemental Retirement Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows: “Commencement. The Deferral Account Balance shall be paid to the Executive commencing in 2018 (no later than April 15, 2018) except as
otherwise provided in this Section 6 but shall not be paid sooner than the earliest date permitted without violating Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.” 

2.     Section 6(b)(i) of the Supplemental Retirement Agreement is hereby amended to read in its
entirety as follows: “50% of the Deferral Account Balance as of December 31, 2017 shall be paid to the Executive as soon as practicable in 2018, but no later than April 15, 2018; and”. 

2.     Except as modified in Section 1 of this Amendment, all of the terms and provisions of the
Supplemental Retirement Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
 3.     This
Amendment may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall be an original, with the same effect as if the signatures thereto and hereto were upon the same instrument. 
 [Remainder of this page intentionally left blank] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the
22 day of June, 2011. 
  

			
	WPP GROUP USA, INC.
		
	By:	 	






 
			
	Name and Title: Assistant Secretary


  

	
	EXECUTIVE
	
	




	Home address:   721 5th Ave, NY, NY 10022
	
	Office address:   100 Park Ave NY NY 10017
**Exhibit 31.2  —  Certification of Chief Financial Officer  —  Sarbanes-OxleySection 302**
I, Ron D. Kessinger, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Triad GuarantyInc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisannual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
d) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; e) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based upon such evaluation; and f) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors:
c) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and d) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
November 5, 2004    /s/ Ron D. Kessinger  Ron D. Kessinger Senior Executive Vice President and Acting Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
MONROC, INC. DECEMBER 31, 1996 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,189,631
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,201,601
<ALLOWANCES>                                   301,624
<INVENTORY>                                  3,977,274
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,855,631
<PP&E>                                      27,310,062
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,802,432
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              40,638,252
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,054,808
<BONDS>                                      5,161,743
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        44,670
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,625,913
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                40,638,252
<SALES>                                     70,401,396
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            70,401,396
<CGS>                                       63,045,372
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               71,286,389
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                35,930
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             736,311
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,585,374)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (217,695)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,367,679)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,367,679)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.31)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OFERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3/A(Nos. 333-121046 and 333-38482), Form S-3 (Nos.333-67138,333-62272) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-50100, 333-41986,333-83639, 333-58023, 333-58021, 333-28957, 333-28955,333-05621, 33-94792, 33-94770, 33-79396, 33-79398)of BioSphere Medical, Inc. of our report dated January 27, 2006,except for Note Q, as to which the date is February 24, 2006, with respectto the consolidated financial statements of BioSphere Medical, Inc.included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2005.

|                       | /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
| Boston, Massachusetts |                                          |
| March 14, 2006   |                                          |

 

----
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                   STEVEN J. JANUSEK, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                              OF PACKAGED ICE, INC.




This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the "Form 10-K") for the
year ended December 31, 2002 of Packaged Ice, Inc. (the "Issuer").

I, Steven J. Janusek, the Chief Financial Officer of Issuer certify that, to the
best of my knowledge:

         (i)      the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
                  (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         (ii)     the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Issuer.



Dated:  March 19, 2003



                                         /s/ STEVEN J. JANUSEK
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Steven J. Janusek


Subscribed and sworn to before me
this 19th day of March 2003.


/s/ DOUGLAS L. REEVES
------------------------------------------
Name:  Douglas L. Reeves
Title: Notary Public, State of Texas

My commission expires:  November 12, 2005
Abel Revill OCHOA, Petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-8845

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

MAR 12, 2007

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

 [DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 06-11109

 

D. C. Docket No. 04-00254 CR-5-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RENATO JIMINEZ,

a.k.a. RJ,

a.k.a. Andrea,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

 

(March 12, 2007)

Before DUBINA and COX, Circuit Judges, and SCHLESINGER,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

_____________________________

*Honorable Harvey E. Schlesinger, United States District Judge for the Middle District of

Florida, sitting by designation.
2

Appellant Renato Jiminez was charged by a federal grand jury with

conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute cocaine and methamphetamine,

in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and attempt to possess with the intent to distribute

at least 500 grams of cocaine, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 and 21 U.S.C. §

841(b)(1)(B)(ii). After a five-day trial, Jiminez was found guilty on both counts.

After a two-day sentencing hearing the district court sentenced Jiminez to

120 months of imprisonment on each count, to be served concurrently. Jiminez

then perfected this appeal.

Jiminez presents the following issues for appellate review:

1. Whether the district court properly denied Jiminez’s request to instruct

the jury on multiple conspiracies, and whether the court abused its discretion in

denying a requested instruction that the purchase of small drug quantities to share

with other people does not establish participation in a drug conspiracy.

2. Whether the district court clearly erred in finding that the prosecutors’

communications with Santacruz were entirely appropriate and did not violate

Jiminez’s rights.

3. Whether the district court committed plain error by excluding the

affidavit of co-defendant Santacruz as inadmissible hearsay.
3

4. Whether the district court abused its discretion in admitting evidence

showing Jiminez’s involvement in the charged offenses, or in admitting the expert

testimony of Special Agent Hadaway and Interpreter Castillo.

5. Whether the district court committed clear error in calculating the

quantities of drugs attributable to Jiminez under the Sentencing Guidelines, and

correctly applied the Sentencing Guidelines to these factual findings.

6. Whether the district court’s application of the Sentencing Guidelines

violated the Sixth Amendment under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125

S. Ct. 738 (2005).

7. Whether the district court properly imposed sentence after considering

the 18 U.S.C. § 3553 factors.

After reviewing the record, reading the parties’ briefs, and having the

benefit of oral argument, we conclude that there is no merit to any of the

arguments Jiminez makes on appeal. Accordingly, we affirm his convictions and

sentences.

AFFIRMED.
posam1ex4iii_gwg.htm


Exhibit 4.3


 





 




  





  











  






 


 







  





  











  






 





 









**SUITABILITY REQUIREMENTS**











 



	
State

	
Suitability Requirements


	
Arizona and


North Dakota

	
Investors must have either (i) a minimum of $150,000 (or $200,000 when combined with a spouse) in gross income during the prior year and a reasonable expectation that the investor will have at least such income in the current year, or (ii) a minimum net worth of $350,000 (or $400,000 when combined with a spouse), exclusive of home, home furnishings and automobiles, with the investment in debentures offered hereby not exceeding 10% of the net worth of the investor (together with a spouse, if applicable).


	 	 
	
Iowa and


New Jersey

	Investors must be “accredited investors” as that term is defined in Rule 501(a) under the Securities Act of 1933.
	 	 
	Idaho 	It is recommended by the Idaho Department of Finance that Idaho investors not invest, in the aggregate, more than 10% of their liquid net worth in this and similar investments which may be considered speculative. Liquid net worth is defined as that portion of net worth consisting of cash, cash equivalents and readily marketable securities.
	 	 
	
Kentucky 

	
Investors are required to have either (i) a minimum gross annual income of $100,000 and a minimum net worth (excluding the value of homes, furnishings, and personal automobiles) of $150,000, or (ii) a minimum net worth (excluding the value of homes, furnishings, and personal automobiles) of $250,000.


	 	 
	Kansas	It is required by the Office of the Kansas Securities Commissioner that Kansas investors limit their aggregate investment in the securities of the company and other similar programs to not more than 10% of their liquid net worth. For these purposes, liquid net worth shall be defined as that portion of total net worth (total assets minus total liabilities) that is comprised of cash, cash equivalents and readily marketable securities, as determined in conformity with Generally Acceptable Accounting Principles.
	 	 
	
Maine  

	
The Maine Office of Securities recommends that an investor’s aggregate investment in this offering and similar offerings not exceed 10% of the investor’s liquid net worth.  For this purpose, “liquid net worth” is defined as that portion of net worth that consists of cash, cash equivalents and readily marketable securities.equivalents and readily marketable securities, as


	 	 
	
Oklahoma

	
Purchases by investors should not exceed 10% of their new worth.  For this purpose, “net worth” is determined exclusive of the value of a home, home furnishings and automobiles.









 


 


D-3
David CHIDDO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5945.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 17, 2024. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, January 17, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A24A0665. SAIL: SCHOOL FOR ARTS-INFUSED LEARNING, INC. v. TRUE NORTH COMPANIES, LLC.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion be hereby GRANTED, and jurisdiction is released back to the trial court upon receipt of this order.
Frances DU JU, Petitioner v. WASHINGTON, et al.

No. 19-5090

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 11/05/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      789,148
COMMITMENTS
  93,132   14,293  251,812  423,723  495,955  768,667  762,060   20,480   27,087

CHANGES FROM 10/29/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -12,925)
   5,927    3,462    3,801  -19,100  -19,218   -9,373  -11,955   -3,553     -970

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    11.8      1.8     31.9     53.7     62.8     97.4     96.6      2.6      3.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      152)
      41       34       63       72       62      144      130
```

----

Updated November 8, 2013
April 5, 2012


 


Dr. David Jacofsky


3010 W. Agua Fria Freeway, Suite 100


Phoenix, AZ 85027


 


Dear Dr. Jacofsky:


 


This letter serves to confirm our mutual
agreement to terminate your Consulting Agreement dated August 11, 2011, effective as of April 5, 2012. For avoidance of doubt,
your prior Consulting Agreement dated August 10, 2010 shall remain in effect.


 


Please indicate your agreement regarding
the termination of your August 11, 2011 Consulting Agreement by signing below.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	Bacterin International Holdings, Inc.
	 	 
	 	/s/ Guy Cook
	 	 
	 	By:  Guy Cook, CEO


 


	AGREED AND ACCEPTED
	 
	/s/ David Jacofsky	 
	David Jacofsky
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 7, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 34744]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12142]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #17383 and #17384; WASHINGTON Disaster Number WA-
00104]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Washington

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 2.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Washington 
(FEMA-4650-DR), dated 03/29/2022.
    Incident: Severe Winter Storms, Snowstorms, Straight-line Winds, 
Flooding, Landslides, and Mudslides.
    Incident Period: 12/26/2021 through 01/15/2022.

DATES: Issued on 05/17/2022.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/30/2022.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/29/2022.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of 
Washington, dated 03/29/2022, is hereby amended to change the incident 
for this disaster to Severe Winter Storms, Snowstorms, Straight-line 
Winds, Flooding, Landslides, and Mudslides.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Joshua Barnes,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2022-12142 Filed 6-6-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
Carl GOLDEN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7011.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/29/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       54,760
COMMITMENTS
  12,220    5,737    1,794   27,247   35,940   41,261   43,471   13,499   11,289

CHANGES FROM 10/22/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,148)
   1,028     -973      428    1,498    1,967    2,954    1,422     -806      726

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    22.3     10.5      3.3     49.8     65.6     75.3     79.4     24.7     20.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       72)
      19       11       11       35       28       59       46
```

----

Updated November 6, 2013
```

```

----

Updated August 1, 2014
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
 Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K filed by United Community on March 30, 2012 with the SEC, film number 12740239, Exhibit 10.1.
ELIZABETA G., Petitioner v. ILLINOIS

No. 19M36

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari out of time denied.
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 123 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 3979, 

3 the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall make the 

4 following correction: In section 1207(e)(2), strike ‘‘cat-
2 

•HCON 123 EH 

1 egories I, II, III, VII, and X’’ and insert ‘‘categories I, 

2 II, III, VII, X, XI, and XIII’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 10, 

2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 123 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives 

H.R. 3979. to make a correction in the enrollment of the bill
Micah JESSOP, et al., Petitioners, v. CITY OF FRESNO, CALIFORNIA, et al.

No. 19-1021.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Motion of Institute for Justice for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Motion of Cato Institute, et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Motion of New Civil Liberties Alliance for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Motion of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Motion of Constitutional Accountability Center for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Motion of DKT Liberty Project, et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.