alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**GreenPoint Financial Corp. and SubsidiariesCertification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as AdoptedPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of GreenPoint Financial Corp. for the quarterended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(the “Report”), I, Jeffrey R. Leeds, Executive Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer of GreenPoint Financial Corp. (the “Company”), certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:  November 14, 2003 |                                                   |
|-------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                                |                                                   |
|                                |                                                   |
|                                | /s/ Jeffrey R. Leeds                                   |   |
|                                | Jeffrey R. Leeds                                       |
|                                | Executive  Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |
|                                | GreenPoint  Financial Corp.                            |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to GreenPointFinancial Corp. and will be retained by GreenPoint Financial Corp. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

Note: The certification the registrantfurnishes in this exhibit is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to theliability of that Section. Such certification will not be deemed to beincorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, asamended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to theextent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

----
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/15/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       32,853
COMMITMENTS
   3,194    4,054    1,916   27,710   26,850   32,820   32,820       33       33

CHANGES FROM 10/08/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      4,328)
     115    1,413     -111    4,374    3,017    4,378    4,319      -50        9

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     9.7     12.3      5.8     84.3     81.7     99.9     99.9      0.1      0.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       40)
       7        6        5       18       20       27       30`

---

Updated October 30, 2013
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Joseph J. Lodovic, IV, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of MediaNews Group, Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
Date: April 29, 2005
/s/Joseph J. Lodovic, IV
Ikemefula Charles IBEABUCHI, Petitioner, v. Officer BANICKI, et al.

No. 18-9232

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATION AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000918904
<NAME> THE SELMER COMPANY INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-04-1998
<CASH>                                           2,930
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   73,948
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,925
<INVENTORY>                                     89,001
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               166,285
<PP&E>                                          79,911
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,497
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 277,489
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,327
<BONDS>                                        125,520
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      86,579
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   277,489
<SALES>                                        150,701
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               150,701
<CGS>                                          100,620
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,487
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,418
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   232
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,929
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,015
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,394
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,621
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,621
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  8621.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  8621.00
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATIONS
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Cabela’s Incorporated  (the
“registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 28, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), each of
the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to his
knowledge:
 
 (1) the
report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2) the
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
registrant.
 
 
 Dated:  August
5, 2008
 /s/ Dennis HighbyDennis
      HighbyPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
 
 / s/ Ralph W. CastnerRalph
      W. CastnerVice
      President and Chief Financial
Officer
 
 Back to Form 10-Q
# C_2017072EN.01000201.xml

| 8.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/2

---

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1))

1

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 72/02)

Decisions granting an authorisation

Decisions granting an authorisation

| Reference of the decision (2) | Date of decision | Substance name | Holder of the authorisation | Authorisation number | Authorised use | Date of expiry of review period | Reasons for the decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C(2017) 1332 | 1 March 2017 | 1,2-dichloroethane
  EC No 203-458-1
  CAS No 107-06-2 | Laboratoires Expanscience, 10 Avenue de l’Arche, Regulatory affairs, 92419 Courbevoie, France | REACH/17/6/0 | Use of 1,2-dichloroethane as process and extracting solvent in the manufacture of plant-derived pharmaceutical bioactive ingredients | 22 November 2029 | In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socioeconomic benefits outweigh the risk to human health arising from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies in terms of their technical and economic feasibility. |

Reference of the decision (2)

2

Date of decision

Substance name

Holder of the authorisation

Authorisation number

Authorised use

Date of expiry of review period

Reasons for the decision

C(2017) 1332

1 March 2017

1,2-dichloroethane

EC No 203-458-1

CAS No 107-06-2

Laboratoires Expanscience, 10 Avenue de l’Arche, Regulatory affairs, 92419 Courbevoie, France

REACH/17/6/0

Use of 1,2-dichloroethane as process and extracting solvent in the manufacture of plant-derived pharmaceutical bioactive ingredients

22 November 2029

In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socioeconomic benefits outweigh the risk to human health arising from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies in terms of their technical and economic feasibility.

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

1

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/chemicals/reach/about/index_en.htm

2

---
```
 
 
OMAN CRUDE OIL - DUBAI MERCANTILE EXCHANGE                           Code-067DU1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/26/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1,000 BARRELS)                                      OPEN INTEREST:       18,813
COMMITMENTS
     357      925        0   17,845   16,234   18,202   17,159      611    1,654

CHANGES FROM 08/19/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      4,261)
    -262      394     -863    6,430    4,326    5,305    3,857   -1,044      404

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     1.9      4.9      0.0     94.9     86.3     96.8     91.2      3.2      8.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       20)
       1        1        0       13        8       14        9
```

----

Updated August 29, 2014
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 129 Received in Senate (RDS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 129

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 17, 2014

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Appointing the day for the convening of the first session of the One 
                      Hundred Fourteenth Congress.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the first regular session 
of the One Hundred Four-

              

teenth Congress shall begin at noon on Tuesday, January 6, 2015.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 14, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION 

JUAN MATA, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

MAXEY CERLIANO, et al., 

 Defendants. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Case No. 6:23-cv-484-JDK-KNM 

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Plaintiff Juan Mata, a former Gregg County Jail inmate proceeding pro se, 

filed this civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to 

United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell for findings of fact, conclusions of 

law, and recommendations for disposition. 

On April 19, 2024, Judge Mitchell issued a Report recommending that the 

Court dismiss this case with prejudice as frivolous and for failure to state a claim 

upon which relief may be granted. Docket No. 9. A copy of this Report was sent to 

Plaintiff at his last-known address but was returned as undeliverable. Docket No. 10. 

Plaintiff has not filed objections or otherwise communicated with the Court, including 

to update his address, since filing his complaint in September 2023. 

This Court reviews the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge de 

novo only if a party objects within fourteen days of service of the Report and 

Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In conducting a de novo review, the Court 

Case 6:23-cv-00484-JDK-KNM Document 11 Filed 08/15/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 32
2 

examines the entire record and makes an independent assessment under the law. 

Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), 

superseded on other grounds by statute, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (extending the time to 

file objections from ten to fourteen days). 

Here, Plaintiff did not object in the prescribed period. The Court therefore 

reviews the Magistrate Judge’s findings for clear error or abuse of discretion and 

reviews the legal conclusions to determine whether they are contrary to law. See 

United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 

918 (1989) (holding that, if no objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Report are filed, the 

standard of review is “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law”). 

Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and the record in this case, 

the Court finds no clear error or abuse of discretion and no conclusions contrary to 

law. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the 

United States Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 9) as the findings of this Court. It is 

therefore ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice as frivolous and 

for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 

So ordered and signed on this 

Aug 15, 2024

Case 6:23-cv-00484-JDK-KNM Document 11 Filed 08/15/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 33
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2148

To make technical corrections regarding the applicability of certain amendments made by Public Law 105–392 to the Health Education Assistance

Program under the Public Health Service Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 10, 1999

Mr. GREEN of Texas (for himself, Mr. BLILEY, Mr. DINGELL, and Mr. CLAY)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on

Commerce

A BILL

To make technical corrections regarding the applicability of

certain amendments made by Public Law 105–392 to

the Health Education Assistance Program under the

Public Health Service Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTION REGARDING HEALTH

4 EDUCATION ASSISTANCE LOAN PROGRAM

5 UNDER PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE ACT.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendments made by section

7 142 of Public Law 105–392 (relating to section 707 of

8 the Public Health Service Act) (112 Stat. 3579) apply to
2

•HR 2148 IH

1 any loan that, under subpart I of part A of title VII of

2 the Public Health Service Act, is made by an eligible lend3 er and insured by the Secretary of Health and Human

4 Services on or after November 13, 1998. In the case of

5 a loan made by an eligible lender and insured by the Sec6 retary under such subpart before November 13, 1998, sec7 tion 707 of such Act as in effect on November 12, 1998,

8 applies to the loan.

9 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 142 of

10 Public Law 105–392 (112 Stat. 3579) is amended by

11 striking subsection (c).

12 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section is deemed to

13 have taken effect immediately after the enactment of Pub14 lic Law 105–392.

Æ
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


<TABLE>
                                                           BioSepra Inc.
                                          STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<CAPTION>
                                                               Year Ended           Year Ended           Year Ended
(in thousands)                                              December 31, 1996    December 31, 1995    December 31, 1994
                                                            -----------------    -----------------    -----------------
<S>                                                                <C>                 <C>                <C>
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding               7,832               7,004              6,326

Issuance of cheap stock and cheap stock equivalents (1)               --                  --                 91
                                                                   -----               -----              -----

Total weighted average number of common shares outstanding         7,832               7,004              6,417
                                                                   =====               =====              =====

<FN>
(1)  Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 83, common stock, convertible
     preferred stock and warrants issued at prices below the initial public offering price of $7.00 per share
     ("cheap stock") during the twelve-month period immediately preceding the initial filing date of the
     Registration Statement, have been included as outstanding for all periods prior to the offering, which
     impact is anti-dilutive to the net loss in each period.

</TABLE>
Collyer GOODMAN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8048.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Shanta PHILLIPS-BERRY, Petitioner, v. LOUISIANA, et al.

No. 19-5017

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

Plaintiff, '

'

versus ' NO. 1:24-CR-4

'

JOSE LUIS HERNANDEZ-JARA, '

'

Defendant. '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Hawthorn conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed 

by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued his Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. The magistrate 

judge recommended that the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. He further 

recommended that the court adjudge the Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed 

against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to the magistrate judge’s findings. The court ORDERS 

that the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate 

Judge are ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the 

plea agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Jose Luis Hernandez-Jara, is 

Case 1:24-cr-00004-MAC-CLS Document 23 Filed 06/07/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 56
2

adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a)

(Reentry of a Deported Alien).

Signed this date

Jun 7, 2024

Case 1:24-cr-00004-MAC-CLS Document 23 Filed 06/07/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 57
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 1520

_____________________________
L EMUEL L. C OOPER , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradford County

. Mark W. Moseley , Judge

. January 16, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , L EWIS , and W ETHERELL , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.3 31

.

_____________________________2 Lemuel L. Cooper, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Brooke Moody , Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
Jeffrey LAGASSE, Petitioner, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 19-8279.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 26, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.