alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TEXARKANA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CASE NO. 5:23-cr-12

§

TREMAIN WILLIAMS §

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The above-styled matter was referred to the Honorable J. Boone Baxter, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal 

Procedure. Judge Baxter conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Federal Rule 

of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 31). Judge 

Baxter recommended that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea and conditionally approve the 

plea agreement. He further recommended that the Court finally adjudge Defendant as guilty of 

Count 1 of the Indictment. Count 1 of the Indictment charges a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1), 

possession with intent to distribute Fentanyl. The Court is of the opinion that the Report and 

Recommendation should be accepted. It is accordingly ORDERED that the Report and 

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 31) is ADOPTED. It is 

further

ORDERED that the Defendant’s guilty plea is accepted and approved by the Court. 

Further, the plea agreement is approved by the Court, conditioned upon a review of the presentence 

report. It is finally 

ORDERED that, pursuant to the Defendant’s plea agreement, the Court finds the 

Defendant GUILTY of Count 1 of the Indictment in the above-numbered cause and enters a

Case 5:23-cr-00012-RWS-JBB Document 32 Filed 03/27/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 86
2

JUDGMENT OF GUILTY against the Defendant as to Count 1 of the Indictment.

 

____________________________________

ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 27th day of March, 2024.

Case 5:23-cr-00012-RWS-JBB Document 32 Filed 03/27/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 87
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-20135 Summary Calendar

RICHARD A. MOSBY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas
(H-96-CV-1959)

October 5, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, JOLLY and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Richard A. Mosby appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment for

Baylor College of Medicine on his claims of employment discrimination based on

race, gender, age, and retaliation for a complaint filed with the Equal Employment

Opportunity Commission. Having considered the briefs and pertinent parts of the

record, and finding no reversible error, we conclude and hold that on the basis of

the facts as detailed, authorities cited, and analysis presented by the district court2

in its Memorandum and Opinion signed and dated January 12, 1998, the judgment

appealed should be and is AFFIRMED.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Eastern District of Texas - Texarkana Division

S3G TECHNOLOGY LLC

5:23-cv-00063

HIBBETT RETAIL, INC. 

Hibbett Retail, Inc. 

By and through its Registered Agent 

Corporation Service Company d/b/a 

CSC-Lawyers Incorporating Service Company 

 211 E. 7th Street, Suite 620 

Austin, TX 78701-3218 

Charles Ainsworth 

Parker Bunt & Ainsworth, PC 

100 E. Ferguson, Suite 418 

Tyler, Texas 75702

6/23/23

Case 5:23-cv-00063-RWS-JBB Document 5 Filed 06/23/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 170
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

5:23-cv-00063 0.00 Print Save As... Reset

Case 5:23-cv-00063-RWS-JBB Document 5 Filed 06/23/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 171
Juan M. SANTIAGO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8339.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 26, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

_________________________________________

)

ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, )

)

Plaintiff, ) Case: 2:24-cv-00052-JRG-RSP

)

v. ) 

)

JACK IN THE BOX, INC. ) 

)

Defendant. )

)

JOINT MOTION FOR DISMISSAL

Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), Analytical Technologies, LLC moves to 

dismiss its claims with prejudice against Jack In the Box Inc., with each party bearing its own 

attorneys’ fees and costs.

Date: June 10, 2024

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Randall Garteiser

Randall Garteiser

 Texas Bar No. 24038912

 rgarteiser@ghiplaw.com

Christopher A. Honea

 Texas Bar No. 24059967

 chonea@ghiplaw.com

M. Scott Fuller

 Texas Bar No. 24036607

 sfuller@ghiplaw.com

GARTEISER HONEA, PLLC

119 W. Ferguson Street

Tyler, Texas 75702

Telephone: (903) 705-7420

Counsel for Plaintiff

/s/ Jon B. Hyland

Jon B. Hyland (State Bar No. 24046131)

HILGERS GRABEN

7859 Walnut Hill Ln., Suite 335

Dallas, Texas 75230

Phone: (972) 645-7728

E-mail: jhyland@hilgersgraben.com

Counsel for Defendant

Case 2:24-cv-00052-JRG-RSP Document 18 Filed 06/10/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 80
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY on this, I caused to be electronically-filed the foregoing document

with the Clerk of Court using the Court’s CM/ECF system. As such, this document was served 

on all counsel who are deemed to have consented to electronic service.

/s/ Randall Garteiser

Randall Garteiser

CERTIFICATE OF GOOD FAITH CONFERENCE

Pursuant to Eastern District of Texas Local Rule CV-7(i), counsel has complied with the 

meet and confer requirement in Local Rule CV-7(h). The Parties have conferenced, and counsel 

is in agreement with this motion.

/s/ Randall Garteiser

Randall Garteiser

Case 2:24-cv-00052-JRG-RSP Document 18 Filed 06/10/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 81
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6490

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ARNOLD LLOYD JACKSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, District

Judge. (5:02-cr-30020-MFU-13)

Submitted: August 14, 2008 Decided: August 20, 2008

Before MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arnold Lloyd Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. John L. Brownlee, United

States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Arnold Lloyd Jackson appeals the district court’s order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) motion. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Jackson, No. 5:02-cr-30020-MFU-13 (W.D. Va. Mar. 14, 2008). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Grant Thomas MCADAMS, Petitioner, v. WASHINGTON.

No. 19-5483

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3 denied.
```

```

----

Updated October 3, 2014
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

NOTICE OF CLERK’S DEFAULT NOT ENTERED

STYLE OF CASE: _________________________________________________________

CASE NUMBER: __________________________________________________________

The clerk cannot enter the default as requested in the above listed case for the following

reason(s):

CLERK’S ENTRY OF DEFAULT

____ Affidavit not received

____ Defendant is an infant (under age 21)

____ Defendant is an incompetent person

____ Defendant is in the military or was six months prior to filing of the complaint

____ Defendant has answered or filed a responsive pleading

____ Answer or responsive pleading was filed; however, was filed late

____ Defendant was not properly served

____ Time to answer has not expired

____ Defendant is the USA _xX

Other - _______________________________________________________

DEFAULT JUDGMENT

____ Affidavit not received

____ Defendant is an infant (under age 21)

____ Defendant is an incompetent person

____ Defendant is in the military or was six months prior to filing of the complaint

____ Defendant has answered or filed a responsive pleading

_____ Answer or responsive pleading was filed; however, was filed late

____ Defendant was not properly served

____ Time to answer has not expired

____ Defendant is the USA

____ Plaintiff’s claim is not for a sum certain

____ Amount due is different in kind or exceeds amount prayed for

____ Does not dispose of all parties in the case

____ Other - ________________________________________________________

David $2
7RROH, Clerk

cc: Presiding Judge Deputy Clerk _____________________________

 Defendant

_____________________________

Xlink Resource Group, LLC v. Expo Petroleum Oil and Gas, LLC

4:24-cv-00035-ALM

✔

X Affidavit does not meet the requirements under Federal Rule 55(a) 

Case 4:24-cv-00035-ALM Document 24 Filed 04/08/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 283
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000810271
<NAME> Select Growth & Income Portfolio
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER>011
   <NAME>Smith Barney Investment Series

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 Oct-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                      Oct-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>              17,837,086
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>             18,194,995
<RECEIVABLES>                         136,489
<ASSETS-OTHER>                            118
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     18,331,602
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>              209,010
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>              33,735
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                   242,745
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                             0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>           17,736,303
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>               1,678,885
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                 301,491
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>              86,795
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                      0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>               (92,150)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                    0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>              357,909
<NET-ASSETS>                       18,088,857
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                      54,417
<INTEREST-INCOME>                      93,082
<OTHER-INCOME>                              0
<EXPENSES-NET>                         56,187
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                91,312
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>              (90,237)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>             328,473
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                 329,548
<EQUALIZATION>                              0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>               7,000
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                    0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                       0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>             1,691,973
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>           315,226
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                       647
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>             15,043,481
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                 2,483
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>              (1,913)
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                     0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                  0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                  44,203
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                       121,406
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                5,901,906
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                  10.100
<PER-SHARE-NII>                         0.160
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                 0.530
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                    0.020
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>               0.000
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                    0.000
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                    10.770
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                          0.95



</TABLE>
UAET (02-2008)

Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint

Attach this form to the Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint event.

CASE AND DEADLINE INFORMATION

Civil Action No.:

Name of party requesting extension:

Is this the first application for extension of time in this case? Yes

No

If no, please indicate which application this represents: Second

Third

Other ___________

Date of Service of Summons:

Number of days requested: 30 days

15 days

Other _____ days

New Deadline Date: (Required)

ATTORNEY FILING APPLICATION INFORMATION

Full Name:

State Bar No.:

Firm Name:

Address:

Phone:

Fax:

Email:

A certificate of conference does not need to be filed with this unopposed application.

2:24-cv-093-JRG

Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company

✔

2/14/2024

✔

4/5/2024

Jennifer H. Doan

08809050

Haltom & Doan

6500 Summerhill Road, Suite 100

Texarkana, TX 75503

(903) 255-1000

(903) 255-0800

jdoan@haltomdoan.com

Case 2:24-cv-00093-JRG Document 15 Filed 02/21/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 100
AO 120 (Rev. 08/10) 

TO: Mail Stop 8

Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

P.O. Box 1450

Alexandria, VA 22313-1450

REPORT ON THE

FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN

ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR

TRADEMARK

In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been

filed in the U.S. District Court on the following

G Trademarks or G Patents. ( G the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):

DOCKET NO. DATE FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT

PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:

DATE INCLUDED INCLUDED BY

G Amendment G Answer G Cross Bill G Other Pleading

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:

DECISION/JUDGEMENT

CLERK (BY) DEPUTY CLERK DATE

Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director

Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy

Case 2:23-cv-00630-JRG Document 2 Filed 12/27/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 91
Exhibit 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The  undersigned  officer  hereby  certifies  that,  to his  knowledge,  (1) the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Productivity Technologies Corp. for the quarter
ended  September  30, 2003 as to which this  Certification  is an exhibit  fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934 (15  U.S.C.  78m(a)  or  78o(d))  and (2) the  information
contained  in  such  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material  respects,  the
financial  condition  and results of  operations  of  Productivity  Technologies
Corp..

Date: March 9, 2004

/s/ Samuel N. Seidman
--------------------------------------------
Samuel N. Seidman,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2018136EN.01000102.xml

| 18.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 136/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 136/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8399 — CWS-boco/Rentokil Initial Target Businesses)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 136/02)

On 7 June 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8399. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8399. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
NO. 07-02-0059-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL E

	SEPTEMBER 11, 2002

	______________________________

	WILLIAM TRAVIS ALLEN, APPELLANT

	V.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 242ND DISTRICT COURT OF HALE COUNTY;

	NO. B14087-0106; HONORABLE ED SELF, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ.  and BOYD, S.J.*

	DISMISSAL

	Pending before this Court is appellant’s motion to dismiss his appeal.  Appellant and his attorney have both signed the motion representing that appellant wishes to withdraw his notice of appeal.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).  No decision of this Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion.  Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed and no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith. 

						Don H. Reavis

						    Justice

Do not publish.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 02/04/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      544,689
COMMITMENTS
 109,192   22,692  152,501  264,705  355,928  526,398  531,121   18,291   13,568

CHANGES FROM 01/28/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -8,334)
   2,701      638   -8,146   -4,837   -2,460  -10,282   -9,968    1,948    1,634

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    20.0      4.2     28.0     48.6     65.3     96.6     97.5      3.4      2.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      145)
      36       34       58       66       61      135      125
```

----

Updated February 7, 2014
EXHIBIT 32.1

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

INTERNATIONAL TEXTILE GROUP, INC.

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of International Textile Group, Inc. (the
Company) for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph L. Gorga, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Joseph L. Gorga                  
|Joseph L. Gorga                      
|President and Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing statement is being furnished to accompany International Textile Group, Inc.s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any other filing of International Textile Group, Inc. that incorporates the Report by reference. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to International Textile Group, Inc. and will be retained by International Textile Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

```

----

Updated September 13, 2013