alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX 10.42 2006 Equity Incentive Plan amendment






Exhibit 10.42


FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
P.F. CHANG'S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
AMENDED & RESTATED 2006 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT (the “Amendment”) to the P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc. Amended & Restated 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is effective as of the date this Amendment is approved by the stockholders of P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc. (the “Company”).
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, the Plan was originally adopted by the Company's Board of Directors (the “Board”) on March 8, 2006, and approved by the stockholders of the Company on May 5, 2006, and was subsequently amended and restated by the Board on February 1, 2011, and again approved by the stockholders of the Company on April 19 2011; and
WHEREAS, the Board now finds it desirable and in the best interest of the Company to amend the Plan, subject to approval by the stockholders of the Company, to (1) extend the term of the Plan for an additional ten years from the effective date of this Amendment; and (2) increase the number of shares to be reserved and authorized for issuance under the Plan by 1,760,000 shares to 3,510,000 shares.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:
1.Change in Term. Section 1.1 of the Plan is amended in its entirety as follows:


1.1      Establishment.  The P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) was adopted by the Board on March 8, 2006, and approved by the stockholders of the Company on May 5, 2006.  The Plan was subsequently amended and restated by the Board on February 1, 2011, and approved by the stockholders of the Company on April 19, 2011.  In 2012, the Board has further amended the Plan subject to the approval of the stockholders of the Company (the date of such approval, the “Effective Date”).
2.Increase in Shares Issuable.  The first sentence of Section 4.1 of the Plan is amended as follows:


Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4.2, the maximum aggregate number of shares of Stock that may be issued under the Plan shall be 3,510,000 and shall consist of authorized but unissued or reacquired shares of Stock or any combination thereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officer.
	
		
	P.F. CHANG'S CHINA BISTRO, INC.

	By:
	 

	 
	Its:

	 
	Title:
Andrea Lee SANDERS, Petitioner, v. HENNEPIN COUNTY HUMAN SERVICE AND PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT CHILD SUPPORT, et al.

No. 19-7402.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 26, 2020

Petition for rehearing denied.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Eastern District of Texas

Dao Health d/b/a Freemie

Plaintiff(s)

v.

Chiaro Technology, Limited

Chiaro Technology, Limited

63-66 Hatton Garden, EC1N 8LE

London, United Kingdom

Meng Xi

Susman Godfrey LLP

1000 Louisiana St., Suite 5100

Houston, TX 77002

2:23-cv-00289

6/21/23

Case 2:23-cv-00289-JRG-RSP Document 3 Filed 06/21/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 83
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

0.00

Case 2:23-cv-00289-JRG-RSP Document 3 Filed 06/21/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 84
Independent Auditors' Consent



To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Smith Barney World Funds Inc.

We consent to the use of our reports, as listed below, with respect to the 
Portfolios of Smith Barney World Funds, Inc. incorporated herein by 
reference and to the references to our Firm under the headings "Financial 
Highlights" in the Prospectuses and "Independent Auditors" in the Statement 
of Additional Information.
 
Portfolio		Date of Independent Auditors' Report

Emerging Markets Portfolio	December 20, 1996

European Portfolio		December 20, 1996

Global Government Bond Portfolio	December 20, 1996

International Balanced Portfolio	December 20, 1996

Pacific Portfolio			December 20, 1996

International Equity Portfolio	December 19, 1996






	KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


New York, New York
February 20, 1997
Ricky LANGLEY, Petitioner, v. Howard PRINCE, Warden.

No. 19-6413.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of G & L Realty Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David E. Hamer, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
Order filed March 28, 2013

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00107

- CV

____________ JUNE G. BARTLE , Appellant

V. MAIN STREET ACQUISIT ION CORP., Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No 1

Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV

- 0067462



### O R D E R
The notice of appeal in this case was filed February 8, 2013

. The clerk’s record was filed March 14, 2013. To date, the filing fee of $175.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellant has established indigence has been filed. See Tex. R. App. P

. 20.1. Therefore, the court issues the following order.
Appellant is ordered to pay the filing fee in the amount of $175.00 to the
Clerk of this court on or before April 12, 2013. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If appellantfails to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal will be

dismissed.

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 99.24






CONSENT OF EXPERT
 
 March 30, 2012
   Eldorado Gold Corporation
  United States Securities and Exchange Commission
  Ladies and Gentlemen:
  Re: Eldorado Gold Corporation
   I, Rick Alexander, do hereby consent to the filing of the written dsiclosure regarding the technical report entitled “Technical Report for the Tocantinzinho Gold Mine Project, Brazil” dated May 4, 2011 and other information pertaining to the Tocantinzho Project, and the use of my name in the Annual Information Form and Annual Report on Form 40-F of Eldorado Gold Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2011 and any amendments thereto and any Registration Statement on Form S-8 incorporating by reference the Company’s Annual Information Form and Annual Report on Form 40-F.
    By:
/s/ Rick AlexanderRick Alexander, P. Eng.Eldorado Gold CorporationProject Director
EXHIBIT 3

FILED UNDER 

SEAL PURSUANT TO 

PROTECTIVE ORDER

To Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss

Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 54-3 Filed 08/14/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:

944
Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 54-3 Filed 08/14/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:

945
# C_2020388EN.01033401.xml

| 13.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 388/334 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 388/334

---

P8_TA(2018)0504

EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 12 December 2018 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Japan for an Economic Partnership (07964/2018 — C8-0382/2018 — 2018/0091(NLE))

(Consent)

(2020/C 388/34)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (07964/2018), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (07964/2018),

| — | having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and Japan for an Economic Partnership (07965/2018), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and Japan for an Economic Partnership (07965/2018),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 91, Article 100(2), the first subparagraph of Article 207(4), point (a)(v) of the second subparagraph of Article 218(6), and Article 218(7), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0382/2018), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 91, Article 100(2), the first subparagraph of Article 207(4), point (a)(v) of the second subparagraph of Article 218(6), and Article 218(7), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0382/2018),

| — | having regard to its non-legislative resolution of 12 December 2018 (1) on the draft decision, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to its non-legislative resolution of 12 December 2018 (1) on the draft decision,

| — | having regard to Rule 99(1) and (4) and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 99(1) and (4) and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade and the opinion of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinion in letter form of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development (A8-0366/2018), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade and the opinion of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinion in letter form of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development (A8-0366/2018),

| 1. | Gives its consent to conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Japan. |
| --- | --- |

2.

---

(1)  Texts adopted, P8_TA(2018)0505.

---
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellant,

v.

MARY MERISIER,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-819

[November 9, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Tim Bailey, Judge; L.T. Case No. 13-11204 CF10A.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Matthew Steven 

Ocksrider, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Nancy Jack, Assistant Public 

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, CONNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION

DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

VIVINT, INC.,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

 

Case No. 2:24-cv-00098-JRG-RSP

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

Defendant, Vivint, Inc., files this Notice of Appearance of Counsel and shows:

1. Vivint, Inc. desires to designate Andy Tindel as additional counsel for Vivint, Inc.

in the above referenced civil action. 

2. Andy Tindel is a member in good standing of the bar of the United States District 

Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The information required by E. DIST. TEX. LOC. CT. R.

CV-11 for appearing counsel is as follows:

ANDY TINDEL

Texas State Bar No. 20054500

MT

2LAW GROUP

MANN | TINDEL | THOMPSON

112 East Line Street, Suite 304

Tyler, Texas 75702

Tel: (903) 596-0900

Fax: (903) 596-0909

Email: atindel@andytindel.com

All notices, orders or other filings concerning the above referenced civil action may be delivered 

to Andy Tindel via the contact information listed above.

Case 2:24-cv-00098-JRG-RSP Document 7 Filed 04/03/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 200
Notice of Appearance of Counsel Page 2

Dated: April 3, 2024

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Andy Tindel

Andy Tindel

Texas State Bar No. 20054500

MT

2LAW GROUP

 MANN | TINDEL | THOMPSON

112 East Line Street, Suite 304

Tyler, Texas 75702

Tel: (903) 596-0900

Fax: (903) 596-0909

Email: atindel@andytindel.com

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

VIVINT, INC.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic 

service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF system per E. DIST.

TEX. LOC. CT. R. CV-5(a)(3) on this the 3rd day of April, 2024. Any other counsel of record will 

be served via electronic transmission.

/s/ Andy Tindel

Andy Tindel

Case 2:24-cv-00098-JRG-RSP Document 7 Filed 04/03/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 201
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,180
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,833
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,182   
<INVENTORY>                                    125,698
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               175,279
<PP&E>                                         431,856
<DEPRECIATION>                                 151,780
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 515,186
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          188,058
<BONDS>                                        945,156
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     19,500
<COMMON>                                           646
<OTHER-SE>                                   (912,302)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   515,186
<SALES>                                        403,475
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               403,475
<CGS>                                          284,621
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   98,632
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,643
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,347
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,768)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       403
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (18,171)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (556)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (18,727)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.30)
        

</TABLE>
- 1 - 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

PAR PHARMACEUTICAL INC., et al § 

 § 

v. § CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00400-JRG-RSP 

 § (Lead Case) 

ALKEM LABORATORIES LTD. § 

 

PAR PHARMACEUTICAL INC., et al § 

 § 

v. § CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00399-JRG-RSP 

 § (Member Case) 

MANKIND PHARMA LIMITED § 

ORDER 

The above-captioned cases are hereby ORDERED to be CONSOLIDATED for all 

pretrial issues with the LEAD CASE, Case No. 2:23-cv-00400. All parties are instructed to file 

any future filings in the LEAD CASE. Individual cases remain active for trial. 

The Clerk is instructed to add the consolidated Defendants into the Lead Case and their 

corresponding Lead and Local Counsel only. Additional counsel may file a Notice of Appearance 

in the Lead Case if they wish to continue as counsel of record in the lead consolidated action. 

Counsel who has appeared pro hac vice in any member case may file a Notice of Appearance in 

the Lead Case without filing an additional application to appear pro hac vice in the Lead Case. 

Counsel who have not appeared in a member case at the point when it is consolidated into the Lead 

Case should file a Notice of Appearance only in the Lead Case, and such Notice should state the 

relevant member case. 

Case 2:23-cv-00399-JRG-RSP Document 46 Filed 11/02/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1041
- 2 - So Ordered this

Nov 2, 2023

Case 2:23-cv-00399-JRG-RSP Document 46 Filed 11/02/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1042
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

SOLOMON EVERFIELD, III § 

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-458

IAH DETENTION CENTER FACILITIES § 

MEDICAL DEP’T

MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING TRANSFER

Plaintiff Solomon Everfield, III, a prisoner confined at the IAH Detention Center in

Livingston, Texas, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action against the medical department

of the IAH Detention Center.

Discussion

When, as in this case, jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1391 provides that venue is proper only in the judicial district where the defendants reside or in

which the claim arose. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), for the convenience of parties and witnesses and

in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division

where it could have been brought. Such a transfer may be done sua sponte and is reviewable only

for an abuse of discretion. Mills v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 886 F.2d 758, 761 (5th Cir. 1989).

Plaintiff’sComplaint concerns allegations that he is not receiving adequate medical treatment

at the IAH Detention Center in Livingston, Texas. The IAH Detention Center is located in the

boundaries of the Lufkin Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of

Texas. Although venue is proper in the Eastern District of Texas, the court has considered the

circumstances and has determined that the interests of justice would be served by transferring this

Case 1:23-cv-00458-MAC-CLS Document 2 Filed 01/03/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 9
action to the division in which the claims arose. Therefore, the Complaint should be transferred to

the Lufkin Division. It is accordingly

ORDERED that this civil rights action is TRANSFERRED to the Lufkin Division of the

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. 

2

___________________________________

Christine L Stetson

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SIGNED this the 3rd day of January, 2024.

Case 1:23-cv-00458-MAC-CLS Document 2 Filed 01/03/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 10
LPS 3.31.12 10Q EX-10.4




Exhibit 10.4


ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO 
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


THIS ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the "Addendum No. 2") is made and entered into effective as of the 30th day of March, 2012 (the “Addendum Date”), by and between LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and Joseph M. Nackashi (the "Employee") for the purpose of modifying and amending certain terms of that Employment Agreement (the “Employment Agreement”), with an Effective Date of December 31, 2009, by and between Company and Employee, as more specifically set forth below.  This Addendum No. 2 shall be supplemental to, and shall be read and construed together with, the Employment Agreement and that certain Addendum No. 1 to Employment Agreement, effective as of October 26, 2011 (“Addendum No. 1”), between Company and Employee, and all capitalized terms that are not otherwise defined in this Addendum shall have the meanings attributed to them in the Employment Agreement.  In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1.Section 3 of the Employment Agreement shall be disregarded and shall be replaced with the following:
Term.  This Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and, unless terminated as set forth in Section 8, continue through December 31, 2013. This Agreement shall be extended automatically for successive one (1) year periods (the initial period and any extensions being collectively referred to as the "Employment Term"). In addition, any and all addendums to this Agreement shall continue through the Employment Term unless otherwise specifically set forth in such addendum. Either party may terminate this Agreement, together with any addendums thereto, as of the end of the then-current period by giving written notice at least thirty (30) days prior to the end of that period. Notwithstanding any termination of this Agreement or Employee's employment, Sections 5(e) (as amended and restated in Addendum No. 1), 8 and 9 shall remain in effect until all obligations and benefits that accrued prior to termination are satisfied.
2.    Incorporation by Reference.  This Addendum is entered into between the parties for the purpose of amending certain terms of the Employment Agreement, and is hereby incorporated therein and made a part thereof. All terms of the Employment Agreement (as modified or supplemented by Addendum No. 1) other than those specifically modified by this Addendum shall remain in full force and effect.


Signature page follows.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Addendum to be effective as of the date first set forth above.
	
		
	 
	LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC.


By:  /s/ Hugh R. Harris            
Name:  Hugh R. Harris
Its:  President and Chief Executive Officer







	 
	JOSEPH M. NACKASHI


/s/ Joseph M. Nackashi