alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dominic LINDSEY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7685.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 26, 2020

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Davis* v. *United States* , 589 U.S. ----, 140 S.Ct. 1060, 206 L.Ed.2d 371 (2020) (*per curiam* ).
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 465 

Recognizing that the Governor of the State of Colorado has proclaimed 

2012 as the ‘‘Year of Water’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 16, 2012 

Mr. UDALL of Colorado (for himself and Mr. BENNET) submitted the 

following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing that the Governor of the State of Colorado has 

proclaimed 2012 as the ‘‘Year of Water’’. 

Whereas water is a precious and limited natural resource; 

Whereas a clean and sustainable water supply is essential to 

the high quality of life enjoyed by Coloradans; 

Whereas a clean and sustainable water supply is essential to 

the success of all aspects of the economy of the State of 

Colorado, including the agricultural, municipal, industrial, and recreational economies; 

Whereas as a headwaters State, the health of the water in 

the State of Colorado has a direct impact on neighboring 

States; 

Whereas the population of the State of Colorado is predicted 

to double by 2050; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 465 ATS 

Whereas educating the public about limited water resources 

will be critical in meeting the increasing demands placed 

on water in the future; 

Whereas 2012 marks the— 

(1) 100th anniversary of the construction of the Rio 

Grande Reservoir; 

(2) 90th anniversary of the Colorado River Compact 

of 1922; 

(3) 75th anniversary of the creation of the Colorado 

Water Conservation Board; 

(4) 75th anniversary of the creation of the Colorado 

River Water Conservation District; 

(5) 75th anniversary of the creation of the Northern 

Colorado Water Conservancy District and the ColoradoBig Thompson Project; 

(6) 50th anniversary of the Fryingpan-Arkansas 

Project, administered by the Southeastern Colorado 

Water Conservancy District; 

(7) 10th anniversary of the Colorado Foundation for 

Water Education; and 

(8) 10th anniversary of the Lower Arkansas Valley 

Water Conservancy District; and 

Whereas the Governor of the State of Colorado has proclaimed 2012 as the ‘‘Year of Water’’ in the State of Colorado: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate recognizes that the Gov2 ernor of the State of Colorado has proclaimed 2012 as 

3 the ‘‘Year of Water’’ in the State of Colorado. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**GreenPoint Financial Corp. and Subsidiaries**

**Certification of Periodic Report**

 

I, Thomas S. Johnson, Chairman and ChiefExecutive Officer of GreenPoint Financial Corp. (the “Company”), certify,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section1350, that:

 
| (1)    |   | the Quarterly Report on  Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 (the  “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
| (2)    |   | the information contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial  condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                          |

 

 
| Dated:   May 13, 2003 |                                                              |
|---------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                            |                                                              |
|                            | /s/ Thomas S. Johnson                                             |   |
|                            | Thomas S. Johnson                                                 |
|                            | Chairman and  Chief Executive Officer  GreenPoint Financial Corp. |

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to GreenPoint Financial Corp. andwill be retained by GreenPoint Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 4345** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. ZEB ANTHONY HENSON , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Lynchburg

. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. ( 6:10

- cr - 00013

- nkm

- 1 )

Submitted : August 25, 2011 Decided: August 29, 2011

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Larry W. Shelton, Federal Public Defender , Christine Madeleine Lee , Research and Writing Attorney, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER , Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. Timothy J. Heaphy, United States Attorney, Jean B. Hudson, Assista n t United State s Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee

. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Zeb Anthony Henson pled guilty to possession with intent to distribute of five grams or more of actual methamphetamine, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (2006). He received a sentence of eighty

- four months’ imprisonment. Henson appeals his sentence, contending that the district court abused its discretion when it denied his request for a downward departure under U.S. Sentencing Guidel ines Manual § 4A1.3 (2010), on the ground that his criminal history category substantially over

represented the seriousness of his criminal history. For the reasons explained below, we dismiss the appeal. The district court has the discretion to depart downward “[i]f reliable information indicates that the defendant’s criminal history category substantial over represents the seriousness of the defendant’s criminal history or the likelihood that the defendant will commit other crimes.” U.S. Sentencing Gu idelines Manual § 4A1.3(b)(1) (2010). However, “[w]e lack the authority to review a sentencing court’s denial of a downward departure unless the court failed to understand its authority to do so.” United States v. Brewer , 520 F.3d 367, 371 (4th Cir. 2008 ). Our review of the record discloses that the district court did not fail to recognize its authority to depart. Thus, Henson’s claim is not reviewable on appeal.3 We therefore dismiss the appeal . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and le gal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISS ED
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

No. 6:23-cv-00324

Larry Coleman Hicks, 

Plaintiff,

v.

Everyone Who Is a Judicial Official

That Threatened My Family

Defendant.

ORDER

Plaintiff Larry Coleman Hicks, an inmate of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice proceeding pro se, filed this civil action 

complaining of alleged deprivations of his rights. The sole named 

defendant is “everyone who is a judicial official that threatened my 

family,” and the only relief sought is “Put them in jail.” Doc. 1. The 

case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole 

Mitchell. Doc. 2. 

The magistrate judge entered a report observing that plaintiff has 

a lengthy history of filing frivolous and malicious lawsuits making 

vile and untrue accusations against various public officials and stating that “the present case represents a continuation of this practice.”

Doc. 3. A review of the complaint demonstrates the accuracy of this 

characterization. 

On January 14, 2020, this court entered an order directing that 

the clerk not accept from plaintiff any documents, pleadings, or 

other correspondence in any lawsuit, new or previously filed which 

does not bear the signature of a licensed attorney. Hicks v. Skeen, No. 

6:18-cv-400 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 14, 2020). Because the present lawsuit 

does not bear the signature of a licensed attorney, the magistrate 

judge recommended that the complaint be stricken and the lawsuit 

dismissed with prejudice. 

Case 6:23-cv-00324-JCB-KNM Document 5 Filed 11/09/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 11
- 2 -

A copy of this report was mailed to plaintiff at his last known 

address but was returned as undeliverable. Plaintiff has not advised the court of any change of address. 

When there have been no timely objections to a magistrate 

judge’s report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for 

clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 

1420 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc). Having reviewed the magistrate 

judge’s report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, 

the court accepts its findings and recommendation. Plaintiff’s 

complaint is stricken and the lawsuit is dismissed with prejudice 

as frivolous and as improperly filed. 

So ordered by the court on November 9, 2023.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cv-00324-JCB-KNM Document 5 Filed 11/09/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 12
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 01/22/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       45,306
COMMITMENTS
   6,677    2,110    2,554   24,691   30,012   33,922   34,676   11,384   10,630

CHANGES FROM 01/15/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -573)
     -78     -492      -95       84      369      -90     -218     -483     -355

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    14.7      4.7      5.6     54.5     66.2     74.9     76.5     25.1     23.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       57)
       9        9       10       34       28       50       42
```

----

Updated January 25, 2013
# C_2017384EN.01001103.xml

| 14.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 384/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 384/11

---

FUSION FOR ENERGY JOINT UNDERTAKING

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2016

(2017/C 384/42)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://www.fusionforenergy.europa.eu/aboutfusion/keydocs.aspx

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the AnnualReport of Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Charles A. Hinrichs, SeniorVice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   /s/  Charles A. Hinrichs                           |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   Charles  A. Hinrichs                               |
|   Senior  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   March 6,  2006                                |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906, has been provided to Smurfit-Stone ContainerCorporation and will be retained by Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
J -S59005-19 

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF 

PENNSYLVANIA 

v. 

DESMOND JANQDHARI, 

Appellant No. 2762 EDA 2018 

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence Entered April 11, 2018 

In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County Criminal Division at 

No(s): CP-51-CR-0003047-2014 

BEFORE: LAZARUS, J., NICHOLS, J., and McLAUGHLIN, J. 

CONCURRING MEMORANDUM BY McLAUGHLIN, J.: 

FILED DECEMBER 30, 2019 

I respectfully concur in the result. Desmond Janqdhari's Pa.R.A.P. 

2119(f) statement asks us to grant review of whether the imposition of 

consecutive sentences resulted in an aggregate sentence that was "unduly 

harsh, considering the . . . length of imprisonment." Janqdhari's Br. at 26 

(quoting Commonwealth v. Lamonda, 52 A.3d 365, 372 (Pa.Super. 2012)). 

I conclude that this states a substantial question, pursuant to Lamonda. I 

nonetheless concur in the result, as I perceive no abuse of discretion in the 

imposition of consecutive sentences in this case.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00353-CR

Patrick Todd

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

319th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 11CR2234-G

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED AS 

MODIFIED by this Court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED 

AS MODIFIED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

March 12, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,358
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,677
<ALLOWANCES>                                       868
<INVENTORY>                                      2,309
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,497
<PP&E>                                           3,973
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,242
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,078
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,140
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           185
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,717
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,078
<SALES>                                         28,263
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,263
<CGS>                                           22,041
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,153
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,719
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   588
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 452
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (22,609)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (22,609)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (22,609)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.22)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
 
                                   EXHIBIT 21
                         CENTENNIAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 
                            SCHEDULE OF SUBSIDIARIES
                              AS OF MARCH 31, 1997
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                      NAME OF ENTITY                            LOCATION        % OWNERSHIP
                      --------------                            --------        -----------
<S>                                                         <C>                 <C>
Centennial Capital Corporation                              Massachusetts           100%
Centennial Technologies Limited                             United Kingdom          100%
Centennial Technologies Canada, Inc.                        Canada                  100%
Centennial Technologies (Thailand) Limited                  Thailand                 51%
Century Electronics Manufacturing, Inc.                     Massachusetts            67%
Intelligent Transportation Systems, Inc.                    Massachusetts           100%
NCT, Inc.                                                   Massachusetts           100%
Subsidiaries of Century Electronics Manufacturing, Inc.
  Design Circuits, Inc.                                     Massachusetts           100%
  Triax Technology Group Limited                            United Kingdom          100%
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Environmental  Service
Professionals, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September
30, 2008 (the "Report") I, Edward Torres,  Acting Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 USC  Section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated:  November 19, 2008


/s/ Edward Torres
---------------------------------------------
Edward Torres, Acting Chief Financial Officer

         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

MOBILE HEALTH INNOVATIVE 

SOLUTIONS, LLC,

Plaintiff

v.

WITHINGS S.A.,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00610-JRG

PATENT CASE

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff Mobile Health Innovative Solutions, LLC and Defendant Withings S.A. hereby

stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of all claims of infringement that were or could have been 

asserted in this Action, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) 

and 41(a)(1)(B). Each Party will bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees.

Dated: July 29, 2024

/s/ Randall Garteiser

Randall Garteiser 

Texas Bar No. 24038912

rgarteiser@ghiplaw.com

GARTEISER HONEA, PLLC

119 W. Ferguson Street

Tyler, Texas 75702

Telephone: (903) 705-7420

Facsimile: (903) 405-3999

Counsel for Plaintiff 

/s/ Bryan P. Collins

Bryan P. Collins

Virginia Bar No. 46762

bryan.collins@pillsburylaw.com

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

1650 Tysons Boulevard, 14th Floor

McLean, VA 22102

Telephone: 703.770.7900

bryan.collins@pillsburylaw.com

Virginia Bar No. 46762

Counsel for Defendant

Case 2:23-cv-00610-JRG Document 10 Filed 07/29/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 118
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

The undersigned attorney represents and confirms that a conference was conducted with 

opposing counsel prior to filing this Joint Stipulation, and counsel is agreed to the relief requested 

herein.

/s/ Randall Garteiser

Randall Garteiser 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing using the Court’s Case Management 

and Electronic Case Filing system, which will send notification of such filing to counsel of record 

in this action registered with the Court’s system. Those counsel not registered with the Court’s 

system will receive service via electronic and U.S. Mail.

/s/ Randall Garteiser

Randall Garteiser 

Case 2:23-cv-00610-JRG Document 10 Filed 07/29/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 119
Case 2:23-cv-00317-JRG Document 5 Filed 09/25/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 45