alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TYLER DIVISION

CHRISTIAN BLANCHARD, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § Case No. 6:23-cv-548-JDK-JDL

§

SMITH COUNTY JAIL, et al., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a former inmate of the Smith County Jail proceeding pro se and in 

forma pauperis, filed this civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 about 

alleged violations of her constitutional rights in jail. The case was referred to United 

States Magistrate Judge John D. Love for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and 

recommendations for the disposition of the case. 

On February 13, 2024, the Magistrate Judge submitted a Report and 

Recommendation that Plaintiff’s claims against the Smith County Sheriff’s 

Department, the Smith County Jail, and the jail’s medical clinic be dismissed for 

failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Docket No. 14. Plaintiff’s 

other claims are proceeding pursuant to a separate order. Docket No. 7. A copy of the

Report was mailed to Plaintiff, who did not file written objections. 

This Court reviews the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge de 

novo only if a party objects within fourteen days of the Report and Recommendation. 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In conducting a de novo review, the Court examines the entire 

1

Case 6:23-cv-00548-JDK-JDL Document 21 Filed 03/20/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 66
record and makes an independent assessment under the law. Douglass v. United 

Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), superseded on other 

grounds by statute, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (extending the time to file objections from 

ten to fourteen days). 

Here, Plaintiff did not object in the prescribed period. The Court therefore 

reviews the Magistrate Judge’s findings for clear error or abuse of discretion and 

reviews her legal conclusions to determine whether they are contrary to law. See 

United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 

918 (1989) (holding that, if no objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Report are filed, the 

standard of review is “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law”). 

Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and the record in this case, 

the Court finds no clear error or abuse of discretion and no conclusions contrary to 

law. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the 

United States Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 14) as the findings of this Court. It is 

therefore ORDERED that the Smith County Sheriff’s Department, Smith County 

Jail, and the jail’s medical clinic are dismissed from this suit for Plaintiff’s failure to 

state a claim against them pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The Clerk shall 

terminate them as Defendants on this docket.

2

So ORDERED and SIGNED this day of

___________________________________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 20th March, 2024.

Case 6:23-cv-00548-JDK-JDL Document 21 Filed 03/20/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 67
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

** **

** **

Reference is herebymade to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2017,by and among LSTAR DEPOSITOR, LLC, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, HUDSON AMERICAS L.P., as Special Servicer,WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as TaxAdministrator and as Custodian and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asTrustee with respect to LSTAR Commercial Mortgage Trust, Series 2017-5 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section3.13 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.           Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during the Reporting Period has been made undermy supervision, and

 

2.           To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary 2019.

 

 

/s/ Leslie Hayton

Leslie Hayton 

Managing Director

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 09/04/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      146,996
COMMITMENTS
  57,013   11,853   10,941   61,657  103,032  129,611  125,826   17,385   21,170

CHANGES FROM 08/28/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -2,484)
   3,077    2,736   -1,555   -1,549   -1,399      -27     -218   -2,457   -2,266

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    38.8      8.1      7.4     41.9     70.1     88.2     85.6     11.8     14.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      179)
      63       24       24       51       76      125      114
```

----

Updated September 4, 2012
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Eastern District of Texas - Marshall Division

ASUS TECHNOLOGY LICENSING INC.

AND CELERITY IP, LLC

2:23-cv-486

AT&T INC., AT&T CORP., AT&T MOBILITY LLC, 

AT&T MOBILITY II LLC, AND AT&T SERVICES, INC.

AT&T Corp.

by and through its Registered Agent

CT Corporation System

1999 Bryan St., Suite 900

Dallas, Texas 75201

Robert Christopher Bunt

Parker Bunt & Ainsworth, PC

100 E. Ferguson, Suite 418

Tyler, Texas 75702

10/19/2023

Case 2:23-cv-00486-JRG-RSP Document 4 Filed 10/19/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 58
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

2:23-cv-486 0.00 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00486-JRG-RSP Document 4 Filed 10/19/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 59
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: PELI POPOVICH HUNT, 

Debtor.

______________________________ 

PELI POPOVICH HUNT, 

Appellant, 

 v. 

DANIEL A. CAPEN, M.D.; et al., 

Appellees.

No. 14-55845 

D.C. No. 2:12-cv-06600-MMM 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Margaret M. Morrow, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 26, 2017**

Before: PAEZ, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Chapter 7 debtor Peli Popovich Hunt appeals pro se from the district court’s 

order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order converting Hunt’s chapter 11 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUL 5 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-55845 

bankruptcy proceeding to a chapter 7 proceeding. We have jurisdiction under 28 

U.S.C. § 158(d). We affirm.

In the opening brief, Hunt fails to address how the bankruptcy court erred in 

converting Hunt’s bankruptcy case. As a result, Hunt has waived her challenge to 

the bankruptcy court’s order. See Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 

1999) (“[O]n appeal, arguments not raised by a party in its opening brief are 

deemed waived.”); Greenwood v. FAA, 28 F.3d 971, 977 (9th Cir. 1994) (“We 

review only issues which are argued specifically and distinctly in a party’s opening 

brief.”).

We reject as meritless Hunt’s contentions that the district court and 

bankruptcy court lacked jurisdiction and demonstrated bias.

All pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED.
----

| (1)    | the                report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| (2)    | the                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                registrant. |

| Dated:  November                5, 2007 |   |                                                                     |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                              | By:    | /s/                Dennis Highby                                         |
|                                              |   | Dennis                Highby                                             |
|                                              |   | President                and Chief Executive Officer                     |
|                                              |   |                                                                     |
|                                              |   |                                                                     |
|                                              |   |                                                                     |
|                                              | By:    | /s/                Ralph W. Castner                                      |
|                                              |   | Ralph                W. Castner                                          |
|                                              |   | Vice                President and Chief Financial                Officer |

Back      to Form 10-Q
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/13/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       83,948
COMMITMENTS
  28,747    2,166    3,580   44,012   75,402   76,339   81,148    7,609    2,800

CHANGES FROM 08/06/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,186)
     539     -657       51    1,494    2,211    2,084    1,605      102      581

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    34.2      2.6      4.3     52.4     89.8     90.9     96.7      9.1      3.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       80)
      16        4        1       36       38       52       43
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/13/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      226,281
COMMITMENTS
  68,889   39,965    1,818  140,200  177,078  210,907  218,861   15,374    7,420

CHANGES FROM 08/06/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,141)
   1,204   -5,134      207       76    7,284    1,487    2,357    1,654      784

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    30.4     17.7      0.8     62.0     78.3     93.2     96.7      6.8      3.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      159)
      41       24       12       66       58      114       87
```

----

Updated August 16, 2013
```
 
 
WHEAT-HRSpring - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                          Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/25/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       70,591
COMMITMENTS
  22,661    6,294    2,038   29,556   47,512   54,255   55,844   16,336   14,747

CHANGES FROM 03/18/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,069)
   1,749      928     -409    1,205    2,215    2,545    2,734      524      335

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    32.1      8.9      2.9     41.9     67.3     76.9     79.1     23.1     20.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       88)
      33       10       13       31       33       71       50
```

----

Updated March 28, 2014
Summary of Non-Employee Director Equity Compensation Program



 Exhibit 10.3 
 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED 

EQUITY COMPENSATION PROGRAM 
 UNDER THE 
 FISHER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 

AMENDED AND RESTATED 2008 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 
 The following provisions set forth the terms of the equity compensation program (the “Program”) for non-employee directors of Fisher Communications, Inc. (the
“Company”) under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The following terms are intended to supplement, not alter or change, the provisions of the Plan.
In the event of any inconsistency between the terms contained herein and in the Plan, the Plan shall govern. All capitalized terms that are not defined herein shall be as defined in the Plan. 

1. Eligibility  
 Each director of the Company elected or appointed to the Board who is not otherwise an officer or employee of the Company or a Related Company (a “Director”) shall be eligible to
receive the Awards set forth in the Program. 
 2. Restricted Stock Unit Grants  

(a) Timing and Number of Restricted Stock Units 
 On the day after the 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, and the day after each Annual Meeting of Shareholders thereafter, each Director shall automatically be granted restricted stock units with a value
of $45,000, based on the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock on the Grant Date, with any fractional share rounded to the nearest whole share (0.5 to be rounded up) (each, an “Annual Restricted Stock Unit Grant”); provided,
that any person who becomes a Director at any time of the year other than the date of the Annual Meeting of Shareholders shall receive a pro rata portion of the value of the most recent preceding Annual Restricted Stock Unit Grant, based on the time
remaining in the one-year period following the date of the previous Annual Meeting of Shareholders, such grant to be effective on the date he or she becomes a Director. 
 (b) Vesting of Restricted Stock Units 
 All restricted stock unit awards
granted under the Program shall be fully vested as of the earlier of: (i) the first anniversary of the Grant Date, and (ii) the day prior to the Company’s next Annual Meeting of Shareholders, assuming the Director’s continued
service on the Board during such period. In the event of a Director’s termination of service prior to the vesting of restricted stock units, such units shall automatically be forfeited to the Company. 

(c) Change in Control 
 Upon a Change in Control, the restrictions applicable to any restricted stock unit grants shall lapse, and such restricted stock unit grants shall become free of all restrictions and become fully vested
and transferable. 
 3. Amendment  
 The Board may amend the provisions contained herein in such respects as it deems advisable. Any such amendment shall not, without the consent of the Director, impair or diminish any rights of a
Director or any rights of the Company under an Award. 
 Provisions of the Plan (including any amendments) not discussed above,
to the extent applicable to Directors, shall continue to govern the terms and conditions of Awards granted to Directors
(!  0

'&(,&##+    0

      0

.+      0 &.&' ,&)()
 .	


0

  0

(!
 0

 "#"(!(,+    0


	
		
	




"#)*",%")-*,&+'&(,&##+1),&)(,),/*) ""!&($+#,"* )(+&!"*,&)(,%")-*,

'&(,&##+1),&)(,),/

  

Case 6:23-cv-00564-JCB Document 9-1 Filed 12/03/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 64
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 108 Received in Senate (RDS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 108

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 17, 2014

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
      Providing for the correction of the enrollment of H.R. 5021.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 5021) an Act to provide an 
extension of Federal-aid highway, highway safety, motor carrier safety, 
transit, and other programs funded out of the Highway Trust Fund, and 
for other purposes, the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall 
make the following correction: At the

              

 end, add the following and conform the table of contents accordingly:

               ``TITLE III--TREATMENT FOR PAYGO PURPOSES

``SEC. 3001. BUDGETARY EFFECTS.

    ``(a) PAYGO Scorecard.--The budgetary effects of this Act and the 
amendments made by this Act shall not be entered on either PAYGO 
scorecard maintained pursuant to section 4(d) of the Statutory Pay-As-
You-Go Act of 2010 (2 U.S.C. 933(d)).
    ``(b) Senate PAYGO Scorecard.--The budgetary effects of this Act 
and the amendments made by this Act shall not be entered on any PAYGO 
scorecard maintained for purposes of section 201 of S. Con. Res. 21 
(110th Congress).''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 17, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Floyd Dewaine SCOTT, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, MONTEREY COUNTY.

No. 19-7921.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Little STONE, Petitioner, v. MAGISTRATE COURT OF TROUP COUNTY, GEORGIA, et al.

No. 19M49.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 7, 2019.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari out of time denied.
William James TRUESDALE, Petitioner v. FLORIDA, et al.

No. 18-8462

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
**Exhibit 32— Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief FinancialOfficer —Sarbanes - Oxley Section 906**Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. section 1350, the undersigned officers of Triad Guaranty Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 andthe information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.Date: November 7, 2005         By: /s/ Mark K. Tonnesen           Mark K. Tonnesen    President and Chief Executive Officer           By: /s/ Eric B. Dana           Eric B. Dana    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  The signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.