alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: August 5, 2008
    
    By
    
    /s/ J. Reid Porter

J. Reid Porter
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Eastern District of Texas

FLEET CONNECT SOLUTIONS LLC

2:23-cv-00555-JRG-RSP

LKQ CORPORATION

LKQ Corporation

c/o Corporate Creations Network, Inc. (Registered Agent)

1521 Concord Pike, Suite 201

New Castle, DE 19803

James F. McDonough, III

ROZIER HARDT MCDONOUGH PLLC

659 Auburn Avenue NE, Unit 254

Atlanta, Georgia 30312

Telephone: (404) 564-1866

Email: jim@rhmtrial.com

11/29/2023

Case 2:23-cv-00555-JRG-RSP Document 4 Filed 11/29/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 37
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

2:23-cv-00555-JRG-RSP

0.00

Case 2:23-cv-00555-JRG-RSP Document 4 Filed 11/29/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 38
Andrew Anthony BROWN, Petitioner, v. William P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States.

No. 19-5133.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the *2663Eleventh Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of the confession of error by the Solicitor General in his brief for the respondent filed on March 6, 2020.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Gates Industrial Corporation plc (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ivo Jurek, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                             
|-----------------------------
|Date: March 14, 2018         
|                             
|/s/ Ivo Jurek                
|Ivo Jurek                    
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this certification required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-2 Filed 04/29/24 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 280
Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-2 Filed 04/29/24 Page 2 of 17 PageID #: 281
Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-2 Filed 04/29/24 Page 3 of 17 PageID #: 282
Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-2 Filed 04/29/24 Page 4 of 17 PageID #: 283
Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-2 Filed 04/29/24 Page 5 of 17 PageID #: 284
Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-2 Filed 04/29/24 Page 6 of 17 PageID #: 285
Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-2 Filed 04/29/24 Page 7 of 17 PageID #: 286
Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-2 Filed 04/29/24 Page 8 of 17 PageID #: 287
Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-2 Filed 04/29/24 Page 9 of 17 PageID #: 288
Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-2 Filed 04/29/24 Page 10 of 17 PageID #: 289
Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-2 Filed 04/29/24 Page 11 of 17 PageID #: 290
Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-2 Filed 04/29/24 Page 12 of 17 PageID #: 291
Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-2 Filed 04/29/24 Page 13 of 17 PageID #: 292
Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-2 Filed 04/29/24 Page 14 of 17 PageID #: 293
Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-2 Filed 04/29/24 Page 15 of 17 PageID #: 294
Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-2 Filed 04/29/24 Page 16 of 17 PageID #: 295
Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-2 Filed 04/29/24 Page 17 of 17 PageID #: 296
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.3


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements No.
33-91438, No. 33-92548, No. 333-03450, No. 333-03452, No. 333-03454, No.
333-13521, No. 333-21905, No. 333-23005, No. 333-33893, No. 333-37273, No.
333-37553, No. 333-37565, No. 333-38071, No. 333-41049, No. 333-42417, No.
333-47563, No. 333-57863, No. 333-64377, No. 333-64379, No. 333-69728, No.
333-77941, No. 333-85684, and No. 333-102541 of Crescent Real Estate Equities
Company of our report dated February 9, 2004, with respect to the Combined
Financial Statements of The Woodlands Development Company, L.P., The Woodlands
Commercial Properties, L.P., and The Woodlands Operating Company, L.P., included
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.

                                        /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Houston, Texas
March 10, 2004
Lakshmi ARUNACHALAM, Petitioner v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, et al.

No. 19-5033

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Agreement for Network Interconnection for Cellular Mobile Network



 Exhibit 4.3 
 The Third Amendment of Agreement for Network Interconnection for Cellular Mobile Network between Indosat and Telkomsel 
 The third amendment of cooperation agreement with Telkomsel to set up network interconnection between our cellular mobile network and Telkomsel’s cellular mobile network No Telkomsel:
Tel.458/LG.05/PD-00/IV/2011 – No. Indosat: 041/C00-C0H/LGL/11 dated April 7, 2011. 
 The Parties: 

 

	1.	 PT Telkomsel; and 


  

	2.	 PT Indosat Tbk 



Scope of The Amendment 

This third amendment was made to implement interconnection tariff based on BRTI’s letter number 227/BRTI/XII/2010 dated on December
31, 2010. In Addition, there were amendments of this third amendment regarding : 

	(i)	 Definitions of International Roaming Expert Group-24 (IREG-24) and International Roaming Expert Group-35 (IREG-35); 



	(ii)	 Service Level Agreement; 



	(iii)	 Fraud Interconnection; 



	(iv)	 Call Scenario & Routing 


 Period of Amendment: 
 This third amendment effective on
January 1st, 2011 and have same expiration date as
Cooperation Agreement.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1143 CA 11-01059**  PRESENT: FAHEY, J.P., CARNI, SCONIERS, GORSKI, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF LIVINGSTON COUNTY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V ORDER
LIVINGSTON COUNTY COALITION OF PATROL SERVICES, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

OSBORN, REED & BURKE, LLP, ROCHESTER (DAVID W. LIPPITT OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT. TREVETT CRISTO SALZER & ANDOLINA P.C., ROCHESTER (LAWRENCE J. ANDOLINA OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Livingston County (William P. Polito, J.), entered January 5, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75. The order denied the petition for a stay of arbitration. It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: November 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
Maria de Lourdes ACOSTA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7817.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
William Conrad YEAGER, II, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO, et al.

No. 19-6442.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 4, 2020

Petition for rehearing denied.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the ____________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No. 2:24-cv-00026

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case 2:24-cv-00026-JRG Document 5 Filed 01/19/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 359
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) . I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

Other (specify):

. My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 2:24-cv-00026-JRG Document 5 Filed 01/19/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 360
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,165
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,921
<ALLOWANCES>                                       246
<INVENTORY>                                     52,220
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                74,896
<PP&E>                                          65,327
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,718
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 127,728
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,796
<BONDS>                                         39,284
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            82
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,756
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   127,728
<SALES>                                        221,505
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               221,505
<CGS>                                          156,939
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  219,763
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,176
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,434)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (531)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,434)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (903)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)
        

</TABLE>
Gary A. ORAM, Jr., Petitioner v. CITY OF DILLON, MONTANA, et al.

No. 19-126

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

CHRISTINE A. REUTHER AND ANI MARIE DIAKATOS,

Petitioners

v.

DELAWARE COUNTY BUREAU OF ELECTIONS AND CHRISTINE ROSSI,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 743 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 8th day of February, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is GRANTED as to the following issue, rephrased for clarity:

Does the failure of a write

- in candidate or other candidate who obtains access to the ballot other than through the filing of a nomination petition to timely file a Statement of Financial Interests, as required by 51 Pa.Code § 15.3(e), constitute a

“fatal defect,” precluding the appearance of the candidate’s

name on the ballot?
Exhibit 32

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Baltic
International USA, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2010
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, David A. Grossman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.

Date:  April 15, 2011

                              /s/ David A. Grossman
                              -------------------------------------------------
                              David A. Grossman
                              Chief Executive Officer and
                              Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1629

NIDELKA BENSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MRS. MARY HINMAN; MRS. GAIL FORD; MRS. CAROL EWING, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:06-cv-00825-REP) Submitted: November 16, 2007 Decided: December 3, 2007 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nidelka Benson, Appellant Pro Se. Gary M. Nuckols, Andrew Philip Sherrod, HIRSCHLER, FLEISCHER, Richmond, Virginia; Walter Jervis Sheffield, WALTER J. SHEFFIELD, ATTORNEY AT LAW PC, Fredericksburg, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Nidelka Benson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss her complaint brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201-219 (“FLSA”) (West 1998 & Supp. 2007). We have reviewed the record and find Benson’s claims, filed more than three years after their accrual, barred by the FLSA’s statute of limitations. See 29 U.S.C. § 255(a) (1998). We further find the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to equitably toll the statute of limitations. We therefore affirm the district court’s dismissal of Benson’s complaint on this ground. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately addressed in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
# C_2019162EN.01012701.xml

| 10.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 162/127 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 162/127

---

P8_TA(2018)0061

Implementation of the Protocol on the financial consequences of the expiry of the ECSC Treaty and on the Research Fund for Coal and Steel ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 March 2018 on the draft Council decision amending Council Decision 2003/76/EC establishing the measures necessary for the implementation of the Protocol, annexed to the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the financial consequences of the expiry of the ECSC Treaty and on the Research Fund for Coal and Steel (14532/2017– C8-0444/2017 – 2017/0213(APP))

(Special legislative procedure – consent)

(2019/C 162/16)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (14532/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (14532/2017),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with the first paragraph of Article 2 of Protocol No 37 on the financial consequences of the expiry of the ECSC Treaty and on the Research Fund for Coal and Steel, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0444/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with the first paragraph of Article 2 of Protocol No 37 on the financial consequences of the expiry of the ECSC Treaty and on the Research Fund for Coal and Steel, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0444/2017),

| — | having regard to Rule 99(1) and (4) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 99(1) and (4) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Budgets (A8-0034/2018), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Budgets (A8-0034/2018),

| 1. | Gives its consent to the draft Council decision; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments. |
| --- | --- |

2.

---
# C_2017056EN.01000501.xml

| 22.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/5

---

Reorganisation measures

Decision on measures to reorganise ‘International Life, General Insurance SA’

(Publication in accordance with Article 271 of Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II))

(2017/C 56/06)

| Insurance undertaking | ‘International Life, General Insurance SA’, registered office at Kifisias 7 & Neapoleos 2, 15123 Marousi, General Commercial Register (GEMI) No 000314501000, Tax Identification Number (TIN) 094130304, Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) 213800NED3OUL1K2V349 |
| --- | --- |
| Date, nature of the decision and date of entry into force | Decision No 214/2/13.1.2017 of the Credit and Insurance Committee of the Bank of Greece concerning:
  the extension of the suspension of payments and disbursements by the insurance undertaking until 28 February 2017, as imposed by Decision No 193/1/27.7.2016.
  Entry into force: as of the adoption date (13.1.2017)
  End of validity: 28.2.2017 |
| Competent authorities | Bank of Greece |
| Address: E. Venizelou 21 |
| 10250 Athens |
| GREECE |

Insurance undertaking

‘International Life, General Insurance SA’, registered office at Kifisias 7 & Neapoleos 2, 15123 Marousi, General Commercial Register (GEMI) No 000314501000, Tax Identification Number (TIN) 094130304, Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) 213800NED3OUL1K2V349

Date, nature of the decision and date of entry into force

Decision No 214/2/13.1.2017 of the Credit and Insurance Committee of the Bank of Greece concerning:

the extension of the suspension of payments and disbursements by the insurance undertaking until 28 February 2017, as imposed by Decision No 193/1/27.7.2016.

Entry into force: as of the adoption date (13.1.2017)

End of validity:

Competent authorities

Bank of Greece

Address: E. Venizelou 21

10250 Athens

GREECE

Supervisory authorities

| Bank of Greece |
| --- |
| Address: E. Venizelou 21 |
| 10250 Athens |
| GREECE |

Bank of Greece

Address: E. Venizelou 21

10250 Athens

GREECE

Administrator appointed

Ioannis Peristeris, father’s name Dimitrios

Applicable law

Greek law in accordance with Article 229 of Law No 4364/2016

---