alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ORIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 23-0188 

BANNER LEE BOYD, 

Petitioner and Appellant, 

v. 

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Respondent and Appellee. 

FILED 

MAY 2 5 2023 

Bowen Greenwood 

Clerk of Supreme Cour 

State of +Vlontana

ORDER 

This Court reviews briefs to ensure compliance with the Montana Rules of 

Appellate Procedure. After reviewing the Appellant's opening brief filed on May 24, 2023, 

this Court has determined that the brief does not comply with the Rule 10. Rule 10(2) 

provides in part: 

Service of all papers required. Copies of all papers, including any transcript, 

filed by any party and not required by these rules to be served by the clerk of 

the supreme court shall, at or before the time of filing, be served by the party 

on all other parties to the appeal or review. Service on a party represented by 

counsel shall be made on counsel. In criminal cases appealed by the 

defendant and in appeals relating to involuntary commitment and 

proceedings regarding abused or neglected children, all briefs, motions, and 

other papers, not including transcripts, shall be served on both the county 

attorney and the attorney general. 

(Emphasis added.) Rule 10(4), in turn, provides: 

Proof of service. Papers presented for filing shall contain a certificate of 

service in the form of a statement of the date and manner of service and of 

the names and addresses of the persons served, certified by the person who 

made service. 

Further, Montana Rule of Appellate Procedure 12(1)(i) requires that the judgment, 

order, findings of fact, conclusions of law, or decision in question, together with the 

1 

05/25/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0188
memorandum opinion, if any, in support thereof, be contained in Appellant's brief to this 

Court. Mr. Boyd's brief contains neither a Certificate of Service nor the underlying order 

NN hich he is appealing. 

Therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that within thirty days of the date of this Order, Appellant shall 

file a copy of the judgment or order appealed from with the Clerk of this Court and serve 

one copy upon each counsel of record in conformity with M. R. App. P. 10(2). 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellant serve all other parties in compliance 

with M.R. App. P. 10(2) in the manner provided by M. R. App. P 10(3) and shall provide 

a certificate of service that complies with M. R. App. P 10(4). 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, to assist Appellant in complying with Court rules, 

the Clerk is directed to provide him with a copy of the Civil Handbook for proceeding 

before the Supreme Court without an attorney. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the times for any subsequent briefing contained 

in M. R. App. P. 13 shall run from the date of filing of the judgment or order appealed 

from. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court give notice of this Order 

by mail to Appellant and to all counsel of record. 

DATED this 25th day of May, 2023. 

For the Court, 

Justice
# C_2017340EN.01001501.xml

| 11.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/15

---

Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 340/07)

| Member State | Spain |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Almeria-Seville |
| Reopening date of the PSO route to Community air carriers | 1 August 2018 |
| Address where the text and any other information or documentation related to the public service obligations can be obtained | Ministerio de Fomento |
| Dirección General de Aviación Civil |
| Subdirección General de Transporte Aéreo |
| Paseo de la Castellana 67 |
| 28071 Madrid |
| MADRID |
| ESPAÑA |
| Tel. +34 915977505 |
| Fax: +34 915978643 |
| Email: osp.dgac@fomento.es |

Member State

Spain

Route concerned

Almeria-Seville

Reopening date of the PSO route to Community air carriers

1 August 2018

Address where the text and any other information or documentation related to the public service obligations can be obtained

Ministerio de Fomento

Dirección General de Aviación Civil

Subdirección General de Transporte Aéreo

Paseo de la Castellana 67

28071 Madrid

MADRID

ESPAÑA

Tel. +34 915977505

Fax: +34 915978643

Email: osp.dgac@fomento.es

The route subject to public service obligations may be operated on the basis of free competition access as from 1 August 2018. In the event that no air carrier submits a programme of services compliant with the public service obligations imposed, access will be restricted to a single air carrier through the corresponding public tender procedure, in accordance with Article 16(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008.

---
Paul NIGL, Petitioner, v. Jon LITSCHER, et al.

No. 19-7899.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                            6846
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    44437
<ALLOWANCES>                                      3820
<INVENTORY>                                      58222
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                127947
<PP&E>                                           52566
<DEPRECIATION>                                   22763
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  186491
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            54199
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           242
<OTHER-SE>                                       88610
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    186491
<SALES>                                         205607
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                205607
<CGS>                                           150611
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   150611
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 81515
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3803
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (30950)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (12248)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (18702)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (18702)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.76)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, David E. Hamer, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of G&L Realty Corp.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                        
|------------------------
|Date: November 15, 2004 
|                        
|/s/David E. Hamer       
|David E. Hamer          
|Chief Accounting Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

ELIZABETH A. HARDIN §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-380

WARDEN, FEDERAL MEDICAL §

CENTER 

MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING TRANSFER

Petitioner, Elizabeth A. Hardin, an inmate currently incarcerated at the Carswell Federal

Medical Center in Fort Worth, Texas, proceeding pro se, filed what appearsto be a petition for writ

of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

The above-styled action was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636 and the LocalRules for the Assignment of Duties to the United States Magistrate Judge

for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case.

Discussion

Petitioner argues that the sentence imposed following her guilty plea conviction of bank

robbery pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) should have run concurrently with a previously

imposed state sentence. 

Analysis

Title 28 U.S.C. § 2241(a) provides that “[w]rits of habeas corpus may be granted by the

Supreme Court, any justice thereof, the district courts and any circuit judge within their respective

jurisdictions.” “To entertain a § 2241 habeas petition, the district court must, upon the filing of the

petition, have jurisdiction over the prisoner or his custodian.” United States v. Gabor, 905 F.2d 76,

78 (5th Cir. 1990) (citation omitted). A § 2241 petition must be filed in the district where the

petitioner is incarcerated. Id.; Hooker v. Sivley, 187 F.3d 680, 682 (5th Cir. 1999). 

Petitioner is currently confined at the Carswell Federal Medical Center in Forth Worth,

Texas. The Carswell Federal Medical Center is located in the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth

Case 1:23-cv-00380-MAC-ZJH Document 4 Filed 01/22/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 11
Division. As Petitioner is not incarcerated in the Eastern District of Texas, this court is without

jurisdiction to consider this petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241;

subject matter jurisdiction cannot be waived. See DeCell &Associates v. F.D.I.C., 36 F.3d 464, 471

(5th Cir. 1991). 

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), for the convenience of parties and witnesses and in the interest

of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it could

have been brought. Such a transfer may be done sua sponte and is reviewable only for an abuse of

discretion. Mills v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 886 F.2d 758, 761 (5th Cir. 1989). 

Conclusion

After considering the circumstances, the court has determined that the interests of justice

would best be served if this petition were transferred to the district in which petitioner is confined

rather than dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction. An Order of Transfer so providing shall be

entered in accordance with this Memorandum Order. 

2

_________________________

Zack Hawthorn

United States Magistrate Judge SIGNED this 22nd day of January, 2024.

Case 1:23-cv-00380-MAC-ZJH Document 4 Filed 01/22/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 12
IN RE Marcus WILLIAMS, Petitioner.

No. 19-7770.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 27, 2020

Petition for writ of prohibition denied.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Glas-Aire  Industries Group,
Ltd.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending June 30, 2004 (the
"Report")  I, Linda  Kwan,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18 USC  Section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated:  August 14, 2006

\s\ Linda Kwan
-----------------------------------------------------
Linda Kwan, Chief Financial Officer,

         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# C_2020076EN.01022101.xml

| 9.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 76/221 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 76/221

---

P8_TA(2018)0209

EU-Norway Agreement on administrative cooperation, combating fraud and recovery of claims in the field of Value Added Tax *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 29 May 2018 on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Norway on administrative cooperation, combating fraud and recovery of claims in the field of Value Added Tax (COM(2017)0621 – C8–0407/2017 – 2017/0272(NLE))

(Consultation)

(2020/C 76/30)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2017)0621), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2017)0621),

| — | having regard to the Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Norway on administrative cooperation, combating fraud and recovery of claims in the field of Value Added Tax (14390/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Norway on administrative cooperation, combating fraud and recovery of claims in the field of Value Added Tax (14390/2017),

| — | having regard to Article 113 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (b), and the second subparagraph of Article 218(8) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0407/2017), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 113 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (b), and the second subparagraph of Article 218(8) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0407/2017),

| — | having regard to Rules 78c and 108(8) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 78c and 108(8) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A8-0147/2018), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A8-0147/2018),

| 1. | Approves conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Kingdom of Norway. |
| --- | --- |

2.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 58 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 58

Prohibiting the use of funds available to any United States Government 
department or agency for the use of force in, or directed at, Syria by 
                    the United States Armed Forces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 9, 2013

 Mr. Poe of Texas introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
 referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the 
Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined 
 by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as 
        fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Prohibiting the use of funds available to any United States Government 
department or agency for the use of force in, or directed at, Syria by 
                    the United States Armed Forces.

Whereas the Government of Syria has not declared war or initiated hostilities 
        against the United States or its allies; and
Whereas Article 1, Section 8, of the United States Constitution states that 
        Congress shall have the power ``To declare War'', ``To raise and support 
        Armies'', ``To provide and maintain a Navy'', and ``To make Rules for 
        the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces'': Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

    It is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) the American people and Congress do not support the use 
        of the United States Armed Forces in, or directed at, Syria; 
        and
            (2) there are not overriding imminent national security 
        interests of the United States at stake and Congress will not 
        fund any military action taken in contradiction to this joint 
        resolution.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR USE OF FORCE AGAINST SYRIA.

    No funds available to any United States Government department or 
agency may be used for the use of force in, or directed at, Syria by 
the United States Armed Forces unless a subsequent Act of Congress 
specifically authorizes such use of force or there is an attack or 
imminent attack on the United States, its territories or possessions, 
or the United States Armed Forces.
                                 <all>
```
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 Eastern District of Texas Headwater Partners II LLC Verizon Communications Inc. et al 2:24-cv-00007-JRG-RSP Headwater Partners II LLC 03/22/2024 /s/ Qi (Peter) Tong Qi (Peter) Tong, TX SBN 24119042

Russ August & Kabat 

4925 Greenville Ave., Suite 200 

Dallas, TX 75206

ptong@raklaw.com (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:24-cv-00007-JRG-RSP Document 28 Filed 03/22/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 291
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, G. Stephen Felker, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Avondale Incorporated;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.   Date:  July 8, 2005 /s/ G. STEPHEN FELKER          G. Stephen Felker       Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
35