alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(logo) Rialto

CAPITAL

 

 

**2018 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item1123)**

** **

** **

Pooling and ServicingAgreement (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement") dated as ofDecember 1, 2017 by and among Banc of America Merrill Lynch CommercialMortgage, Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as MasterServicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank,National Association as Certificate Administrator, Wilmington Trust, NationalAssociation as Trustee and Park Bridge Lender Services, LLC as OperatingAdvisor and Asset Representations Reviewer relating to the BANK 2017-BNK9,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2017-BNK9 **(BANK2017-BNK9)**

 

The undersigned, a dulyauthorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the"Special Servicer") herein certifies to the following:

 

1.       All servicing activities and performanceof such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement areperformed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

2.       A review of the servicing activities andperformance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1, 2018 toDecember 31, 2018 (the "Reporting Period") in accordance with thePooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.

 

3.       To the best of my knowledge, based on suchreview, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theterms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for theReporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any suchobligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and statusthereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

Certified by: /s/ Adam Singer

Adam Singer, ManagingDirector 

 

Date: March 1, 2019
Derrick Lamar CHEEKS, Petitioner, v. Alford JOYNER.

No. 19-7461.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Paul Brannelly, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

 

(1)                                 the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                 the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|     | /s/   PAUL BRANNELLY                                   |
|----------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|     |                                                   |
|     | Paul   Brannelly                                       |
| * * | *Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer* |

 

Date: June 22, 2015

 

----
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018329EN.01000301.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 18.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/3 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9046 — Taiyo Nippon Sanso/Praxair EEA Business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 329/03)

1.

On 11 September 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018329EN.01000301-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Taiyo Nippon Sanso Corporation (‘TNSC’) (Japan), controlled by Mitsubishi Chemical Holdings Corporation (‘MCHC’) (Japan), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Praxair EEA Business, being divested pursuant to the commitments submitted in Case M.8480 — Praxair/Linde. |

TNSC acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Praxair EEA Business.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for TNSC: manufacture and supply of industrial gases for use in a variety of industrial applications,

—   for MCHC: chemical, industrial gas, and pharmaceutical industries,

—   for Praxair EEA Business: manufacture and supply of industrial gases for use in a variety of industrial applications.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9046 — Taiyo Nippon Sanso/Praxair EEA Business

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| E-mail: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018329EN.01000301-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---
Kevin SOUFFRANT, Petitioner, v. Kevin KAUFFMAN, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Huntingdon, et al.

No. 19-7748.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Fred ANDERSON, Jr., Petitioner v. FLORIDA

No. 18-1306

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.

Justice Sotomayor, dissenting from the denial of certiorari:

I dissent for the reasons set out in *Reynolds v. Florida* , 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 27, 202 L.Ed.2d 389 (2018) (Sotomayor, J., dissenting).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER PARTNERS II LLC,

Plaintiff, 

v.

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, D/B/A/ 

VERIZON WIRELESS AND VERIZON 

CORPORATE GROUP INC., 

Defendant.

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-cv-00007-JRG-RSP

ORDER

Before the Court is the Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Proposed Discovery 

Order and Protective Order filed by Plaintiff Headwater Partners II LLC and Defendants 

Cellco Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless, and Verizon Corporate Services Group Inc. 

Dkt. No. 34. After consideration, and noting its joint nature, the Motion is 

GRANTED. It is

ORDERED that the deadline for the parties’ to file a proposed Protective Order and a 

proposed Discovery Order is April 25, 2024. 

Case 2:24-cv-00007-JRG-RSP Document 35 Filed 04/17/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 326
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23
- 30362 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,** versus **Paul Anthony Lewis,** Defendant

— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:22
- CR
- 184
- 1

**_______________ _______________**  Before **Davis, Ho,** and **Ramirez,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** A jury convicted Paul Anthony Lewis of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute various controlled substances and several counts of possession with intent to distribute controlled substances. The district court sentenced him to 240 months of imprisonment , to be followed by supervised re lease .

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 5, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-30362 Document: 00517055820 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/05/2024No. 23
- 30362

2 On appeal, Lewis argues that the Government called a witness to testify at trial for the sole purpose of impeaching her in order to introduce a recording of her interview with authorities , which would otherwise be inadmissible as hearsay. The evide nce contained in the recording , according to Lewis, was the only thing linking him to a backpack containing narcotics. A district court’s evidentiary rulings are reviewed under the abuse of discretion standard. United States v. Cisneros
- Gutierrez , 517 F. 3d 751, 757 (5th Cir. 2008) . Any party may attack the credibility of a witness, “including the party calling the witness.” **Fed. R. Evid.** 607 . However, the Government “may not call a witness it knows to be hostile for the primary purpose of eliciting otherwise inadmissible impeachment testimony.” Cisneros
- Gutierrez , 517 F.3d at 760 (internal quotation marks and footnote citation omitted) . Lewis fails to show that this was the Government’s primary purpose. See id. Lewis ’s reliance on United States v. Hogan , 763 F.2d 697 (5th Cir. 1985), opinion withdrawn in part on other grounds , 771 F.2d 82 (5th Cir. 1985), is unavailing . Here, t he Government indicated that the witness’s testimony at trial might be different from her prior statement , the witness ’ s prior statements were not under oath , and the witness’s testimony was helpful to the Government in that she admitt ed that she told authorities that Lewis carr ied the backpack . Accordingly, Lewis has failed to show that the district court abused its discretion in allowing the Government to present witness ’s testimony . See Cisneros
- Gutierrez , 517 F.3d at 757 , 760 . **AFFIRMED** . Case: 23-30362 Document: 00517055820 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/05/2024
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Glas-Aire  Industries Group,
Ltd.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 (the
"Report")  I, Linda  Kwan,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18 USC  Section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated:  August 10, 2006


\s\ Linda Kwan
-----------------------------------------------------
Linda Kwan, Chief Financial Officer,

         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
No. io-m-oo\5k-e&
IN THE COURT OFCR\NV\NM- A9PEALS RECBVED IN

_ COURTOFCRTOI A°PF-MS MICHEL OoN POGcUE ^ OCT 162015 THE STATE OF TEXAS

FRO0f\ THE TENTH COURT OF APPEND NO. ICHH-OOISC-CR FILEDIN FRoNV THE 4V5TH D\STR\CT c60WR»inalappeals JOHNSON CuuNTN OCT 162015
AbelAcosta, Cierk FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TlNVE TO FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONS *REV\E\s/
TO THE HONORK&LE TUD&ES OF THE CjOORT OF CfcNYttlML A9P£AL^'c CCMES NCM, N\\CHI\EL DovM ?ofid)G. pQ^<V\o<\ef, 

### and -Piles FK\6 mo"V\&rs 4or a<\ ex4e<\$\t>*s o-f (oO dia.\j5 \<\ U>V\\cV\ -Vc> ^i\e a PertiW* -for DvScreV\o(\acs| RevUio.XVN Support o£ 4^i5 mo-Hon, appeUouvt sWxjq64\\e GdoH 4-Y\e -K>UounVvjt

X 

### TUe PeMVioner uxxs coiNvncA-ed in4V\e H\3TH 

### DvsVcid- Court o-C ToW\son CoofvVy 0£ AV\e offense o-£ 5€\ual AssauH- o^c\ChUd ao>ckIodece(\cv/ ui*'VV\achtM

ir\ Cause- KID, EH*!^ s-tyW £*W-e o£ Terns V, {VUcUA£l 

### boo %3<je0 The Tfe,+Wi'of\ec applied Hro 4V\e Couf4o£ App^pds ,TENTH Supreme TudUc«.\ bis-VcicLTHe CA^euccS

— Pc^e I-

### CVp4\*rme<di on the ITTH day ©£ September, 201S:

an 

### The present dleadlWne 4or-ft'lih^.+he/PeFv4-\o<\ -for DiSCceMoncio^ "Revieuo \S thd. ITTH day o-£ October, 20\S", THe Petitioner ha<. not reaoestsd an^ extension pcnor^ A-o 4^is request.
TEL Petitionee5 request 4t>r an extension \s> Ws«d upo^ Peti+(o(\er oua.^ ncA inJWm-eA o£tV\e decision o-ftV\t 

### CourtotAppea\s in Q^irmin^ his C<vse until Sept. *S, zoi^ 45('nc€ -ttavt-time Pet\4rloner Vw> be^n atW*vv£ft\ne\ to Gj<\in



### le<^a\ repoesentcvM^ VrS4h\s flatter, U\s atW(\ey on appeal, Sheiiy Fouler, has io^orrn^dl feVvtionec 4\\xt sheuilVnot represent him ontVe fetVYibn -fee T>fearetk>nafy <fev\euo. WUEREFc^£/ petiti&ner pco^s this Ccsort o^^tuxt-thb 

### ITictiDA and extend the deadline 4br -filingtta. Petition -&r Olscreti'bna^v/ Itev/ieou in CO£e K)0. lo-iH-OOtSk-CK -to 

### the ICettA ctas| o£ December, zo^,
Hl'chael Don Pg^ PettttDAe^ pct> se Te*a<» Depwtmefto^ Criminal TuvVice Poiuoskv/ Unit TDCSMOtt WIST!

ZTlt FfYV ZSO S

L\v/\n^<Aon,TK ^135"!

- Pa<^e 2~
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
Second Quarter 1997 Financial Statement and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997   
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                         322,858 
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,796,704   
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    684,616
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,915,207      
<PP&E>                                      16,630,521     
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,358,203       
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,149,012     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,142,661          
<BONDS>                                     11,312,258 
<COMMON>                                        36,563     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,657,530    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,149,012       
<SALES>                                      5,589,613         
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,589,613         
<CGS>                                        3,565,080         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,565,080          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               367,016      
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0     
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             134,916      
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,330          
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0     
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,330         
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0     
<CHANGES>                                            0  
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,330
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        
                                  


</TABLE>
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 06/04/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       89,301
COMMITMENTS
  21,928    5,621    2,043   59,507   78,559   83,478   86,223    5,823    3,078

CHANGES FROM 05/28/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,164)
  -1,733       84       21      590   -2,331   -1,122   -2,226      -42    1,062

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    24.6      6.3      2.3     66.6     88.0     93.5     96.6      6.5      3.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       74)
       9        5        1       38       36       47       42
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 06/04/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      224,281
COMMITMENTS
  66,757   36,916    5,597  135,830  176,962  208,184  219,475   16,097    4,806

CHANGES FROM 05/28/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      7,789)
   3,191    1,278    1,083    3,653    7,875    7,927   10,236     -138   -2,447

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    29.8     16.5      2.5     60.6     78.9     92.8     97.9      7.2      2.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      153)
      39       15       10       77       51      122       70
```

----

Updated June 7, 2013
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.4

                       AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

                               (JOSEPH S. CANTIE)


                  FIRST AMENDMENT dated as of April 30, 2004 (this "Amendment")
to EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") dated as of February 13, 2003 by and
between TRW Automotive Inc. (formerly known as TRW Automotive Acquisition Corp.
(the "Company") and Joseph S. Cantie ("Executive").

                  WHEREAS, in recognition of Executive's contributions to the
Company, the Company desires to change Executive's title as set forth herein;

                  In consideration of the premises and mutual covenants herein
and for other good and valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows:

                  1. Defined Terms. Capitalized terms used herein but not
defined shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Agreement.

                  2. Amendment to Section 2(a) of the Agreement. The first
sentence of Section 2(a) of the Agreement shall be amended to read in its
entirety as follows: "During the Employment Term, Executive shall serve as the
Company's Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer."

                  3. No Other Amendments; Effectiveness. Except as set forth in
this Amendment, the Agreement is ratified and confirmed in all respects. This
Amendment shall be effective as of the date hereof.

                  4. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and
construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without regard
to conflicts of laws principles thereof.

                  5. Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts,
each of which shall be an original, with the same effect as if the signatures
thereto and hereto were upon the same instrument.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this
Agreement as of the day and year first above written.

TRW Automotive Inc.                                  Joseph S. Cantie



          /s/ John C. Plant                          /s/ Joseph S. Cantie
------------------------------------        ------------------------------------

By:  John C. Plant
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
Timmy WALLACE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7716.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 57 

Expressing the opposition of the Congress to the Environmental Protection 

Agency’s proposed rule establishing new source performance standards 

to limit greenhouse gas emissions from new power plants. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2013 

Mr. RAHALL submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the opposition of the Congress to the Environmental Protection Agency’s proposed rule establishing 

new source performance standards to limit greenhouse 

gas emissions from new power plants. 

Whereas affordable, abundant, reliable coal-fueled electric energy is essential to the Nation’s economy, jobs, national 

security, and energy independence; 

Whereas the Environmental Protection Agency has issued a 

proposed rule that would limit the Nation’s energy options and lead to increased power costs for American 

families and businesses; 

Whereas the proposed rule would be detrimental to the Nation’s coal mining regions and the livelihoods and wellVerDate Mar 15 2010 20:57 Sep 20, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HC57.IH HC57

tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 57 IH 

being of American coal miners, their families, and their 

communities; 

Whereas the energy and environmental policies of the Administration have stymied private-sector investment in new 

coal-fueled power plants, undermining the integrity of 

economic assumptions on which the proposed rule is 

based; 

Whereas the Administration has failed to provide sufficient 

funding and leadership to further the development and 

broad deployment of carbon capture and sequestration 

(CCS) technologies, and the only new power plants projected to be equipped to meet the standards under the 

proposed rule are those that incorporate federally funded 

CCS technology; 

Whereas emissions caps in the proposed rule are expected to 

influence future caps on emissions from existing coalfueled power plants, natural gas-fired power plants, and 

manufacturers; 

Whereas worldwide consumption of coal is expected to increase among China, India, and other foreign competitor 

nations in the coming decades and the proposed rule will 

do nothing to address resulting increases in emissions 

from foreign sources; and 

Whereas proposed unilateral emissions caps would stifle the 

Nation’s growth, contribute to trade disadvantages, undermine the Nation’s international competitiveness, and 

contribute to the loss of American jobs: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That the Congress opposes the Environ3 mental Protection Agency’s rule establishing new source 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HCON 57 IH 

1 performance standards to limit greenhouse gas emissions 

2 from new power plants. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS