alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANACIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,622
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,387
<ALLOWANCES>                                       201
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,112
<PP&E>                                           5,738
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  50,878
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,412
<BONDS>                                         10,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            42
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,803
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    50,878
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                54,905
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,825
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,418
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,251
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,411
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,124
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,287
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (150)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,137
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATIONS


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cabela's Incorporated  (the “registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended  October 2, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), each of the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to his knowledge:





(1)      the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)      the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.





Dated:November 5, 2010/s/ Thomas L. MillnerThomas L. MillnerPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Ralph W. CastnerRalph W. CastnerExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer























Back to Form 10-Q
No. 6:23-cv-00570

Matthew J. Kerns,

Petitioner,

v.

294th District Court et al.

Respondents.

ORDER 

Petitioner Matthew J. Kerns, proceeding pro se, filed this 

mandamus proceeding. The case was referred to United States 

Magistrate Judge John D. Love. 

The magistrate judge issued a report (Doc. 2) recommending 

that petitioner’s mandamus petition be denied and that the case 

be dismissed with prejudice. The magistrate judge further recommended that should a certificate of appealability be required, it 

should be denied. A copy of this report was sent to petitioner at 

his last-known address via certified mail. The docket reflects that 

the mail was returned as undeliverable. Doc. 3. To date, petitioner 

has not filed objections or otherwise communicated with the 

court. The objection period has expired. 

When there have been no timely objections to a magistrate 

judge’s report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for 

clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 

1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court 

accepts its findings and recommendation. Petitioner’s mandamus 

petition is denied, and this proceeding is dismissed with prejudice. A certificate of appealability is denied. 

Case 6:23-cv-00570-JCB-JDL Document 4 Filed 03/27/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 13
- 2 -

So ordered by the court on March 27, 2024.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cv-00570-JCB-JDL Document 4 Filed 03/27/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 14
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000775370
<NAME> SMITH BARNEY MUNI FUNDS
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER> 12
   <NAME> GEORGIA PORTFOLIO. CLASS L

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                       51,858,071
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                      50,886,684
<RECEIVABLES>                                  843,379
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                       0
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,730,063
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                       659,353
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                      180,831
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                            840,184
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                      0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                    52,466,996
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                          552,131
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                          544,712
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                      (2,038)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                      (876,692)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                     (698,387)
<NET-ASSETS>                                50,889,879
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                                    0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                            1,485,555
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                                 258,474
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                      1,227,081
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                     (772,405)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                  (3,117,411)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                      (2,662,735)
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                      150,530
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                         51,992
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                     54,214
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                              9,641
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                     (4,727,182)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                        (3,157)
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                    (104,287)
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                          200,616
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                                258,474
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                         7,164,145
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                            13.41
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                  00.27
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                         (0.94)
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                              0.27
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                            0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                              12.47
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                  01.33


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
          BOSTON FINANCIAL TAX CREDIT FUND VIII, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP


                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Financial Tax Credit Fund VIII
(the "Fund") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Partnership.




                                        /s/Gary Mentesana
                                        --------------------------------------
                                        Gary Mentesana
                                        Principal Executive Officer and
                                        Principal Financial Officer
                                        Arch Street VIII, LP, as
                                        Managing General Partner of
                                        Boston Financial Tax Credit Fund VIII,
                                        A Limited Partnership


                                        Date:   February 14, 2007



A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## **EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS REQUIRED BY**

# **SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof Steinway Musical Instruments, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Dana D. Messina, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify that to the best of my knowledge:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Dana D. Messina                   |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                  |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | (Principal Executive  Officer)        |

 

 

May 10, 2005

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Steinway MusicalInstruments, Inc. and will be retained by Steinway Musical Instruments, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/30/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      388,083
COMMITMENTS
 104,373  168,708   85,197  173,916  105,417  363,486  359,322   24,597   28,761

CHANGES FROM 04/23/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      6,492)
   9,033    2,995   12,845  -16,026  -11,624    5,852    4,216      640    2,276

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    26.9     43.5     22.0     44.8     27.2     93.7     92.6      6.3      7.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      165)
      54       63       76       36       34      134      140
```

----

Updated May 3, 2013
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6657

BRADLEY OLEY LESTER,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

DAVID BALLARD, Warden, Mt. Olive Correctional Complex,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph R. Goodwin,

District Judge. (2:12-cv-00224)

Submitted: September 27, 2013 Decided: October 7, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jonathan D. Byrne, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, 

George H. Lancaster, Jr., Assistant Federal Public Defender,

Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Christopher S. 

Dodrill, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Charleston, West 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Bradley Oley Lester seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Lester has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 10.22

                             PROMISSORY DEMAND NOTE

$50,000                                                       DECEMBER  2,  2003

     FOR  VALUE RECEIVED, H.E.R.C. PRODUCTS INCORPORATED, a Delaware Corporation
("Maker"), promises to pay to S. STEVEN CARL ("Holder"), or order, the principal
sum  of  Fifty  Thousand Dollars ($50,000), together with interest on the unpaid
portion thereof from date until paid at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum
from  December  2,  2003,  on  demand,  as  follows:

     Maker  shall  make payment in lawful money of the United States of America.

     This  Note  may  be  prepaid  in  whole or in part, without penalty, at the
option  of  Maker  and  without  the  consent  of  Holder.

     This  Note is nonrecourse as to Maker and is made without the pledge of any
security  interest  in  the  property,  realty  or  personalty,  of  Maker.

The  Maker  agrees that in case of the event of default in payment of this Note,
and  it is placed in the hands of an attorney for collection, or suit is brought
on  the  same,  or  same is collected through Probate or Bankruptcy proceedings,
then  an additional amount of ten percent (10%) on the principal and interest of
this  Note  shall  be  added  to  the  same  as  collection  fees.

     The  laws  of  the  State  of Virginia excluding its conflict of laws rules
shall govern this Note. The exclusive jurisdiction and venue of any legal action
instituted  by  any  party  to  this  Note  shall  be  Norfolk,  Virginia.

     MAKER:

II.     H.E.R.C.  PRODUCTS  INCORPORATED
     (a  Delaware  Corporation)


     By:     /s/  John  A.  Gulick  III
          -----------------------------
          John  A.  Gulick  III
          Vice  President-Office  of  General  Counsel



     HOLDER:

     S.  STEVEN  CARL

       /s/  S.  Steven  Carl
     -----------------------


<PAGE>
Brett JONES, Petitioner, v. MISSISSIPPI.

No. 18-1259

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Mississippi granted.
Hector R. DeJESUS, petitioner, v. Salvador A. GODINEZ, et al.

No. 18-6613.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       8,455,142               8,455,142
<SECURITIES>                                 7,471,167               7,471,167
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,408,293               1,408,293
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    936,981                 936,981
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,271,583              18,271,583
<PP&E>                                       8,418,408               8,418,408
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,462,637               5,462,637
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,529,587              21,529,587
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,793,367               4,793,367
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       134,395                 134,395
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,414,296              15,414,296
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,529,587              21,529,587
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,099,498                 773,506
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,871,378                 950,142
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,756,541               5,018,081
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              99,700                  48,803
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,082,289)             (4,999,555)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,082,289)             (4,999,555)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,082,289)             (4,999,555)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.68)                   (.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.68)                   (.37)


</TABLE>
Carlton P. CABOT, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5077

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       8,801,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,990,000<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    547,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,903,000
<PP&E>                                      10,752,000<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,628,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,419,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,473,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,628,000
<SALES>                                     27,279,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,279,000
<CGS>                                       20,338,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               24,019,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,732,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               748,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (247,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,027,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    63,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            964,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   964,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
<FN>
<F1>The values for the tags of (Receivables) and (PP&E) represent net amounts.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>