alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 3.2

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                          OF SYNERGISTIC HOLDINGS CORP.


                  Synergistic Holdings Corp., a corporation organized and
existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware (the "Corporation"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

                  FIRST: That the Board of Directors of the Corporation, by a
unanimous vote, filed in the minutes of a meeting of the Board, adopted a
resolution proposing and declaring advisable the following amendment to the
Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation:

                           RESOLVED, that subject to the approval of the
                           stockholders of the Corporation, the first paragraph
                           of Article Fourth of the Certificate of Incorporation
                           be amended to read in its entirety as follows:

                                    "FOURTH: The total number of shares of
                           capital stock which the Corporation shall have
                           authority to issue is forty million (40,000,000)
                           shares, of which thirty-nine million (39,000,000)
                           shares shall be Common Stock, par value $.01 per
                           share and one million (1,000,000) shares shall be
                           Preferred Stock, par vale $.01 per share.

                  THIRD: That thereafter, pursuant to a resolution of the
Corporation's Board of Directors, an annual meeting of the stockholders of the
Corporation was duly called and held, upon notice in accordance with Section 222
of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, at which meeting the
necessary number of shares as required by statute were voted in favor of the
foregoing amendment.

                  FOURTH: That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance
with the applicable provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of
the State of Delaware.


                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this
Certificate to be signed by Pershing Sun, its Senior Vice President and Chief
Information Officer, this 7th day of January 1998.

                                  SYNERGISTIC HOLDINGS CORP.


                                  By: /s/ Pershing Sun
                                      ---------------------------------------
                                      Name:  Pershing Sun
                                      Title: Senior Vice President and
                                             Chief Information Officer
```

```

----

Updated June 6, 2014
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/08/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       50,959
COMMITMENTS
   9,975    7,497    1,418   24,868   31,059   36,261   39,973   14,697   10,986

CHANGES FROM 10/01/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,170)
   2,702     -469       -1   -1,015    3,782    1,686    3,311      484   -1,142

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    19.6     14.7      2.8     48.8     60.9     71.2     78.4     28.8     21.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       76)
      14       18        9       39       30       58       52
```

----

Updated October 28, 2013
Independent Auditors' Consent




To the Shareholders and Trustees of
Smith Barney Adjustable Rate Government Income Fund:

We consent to the incorporation by reference, in this Prospectus
and Statement of Additional Information, of our report dated July
13, 2000, on the statement of assets and liabilities of the Smith
Barney Adjustable Rate Government Income Fund (the Fund) as of May
31, 2000 and the related statement of operations for the year then
ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the
years in the two-year period then ended and the financial
highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then
ended. These financial statements and financial highlights and our
report thereon are included in the Annual Report of the Fund as
filed on Form N-30D. We also consent to the references to our firm
under the headings "Financial Highlights" in the Prospectus and
"Auditors" in the Statement of Additional Information.



KPMG LLP


New York, New York
September 28, 2000
Page
Independent Auditors Report


To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
the Smith Barney Income Funds:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements
of the Smith Barney High Income Fund of the Smith Barney Income
Funds (Fund) for the year ended July 31, 2002, we considered its
internal control, including control activities for safeguarding
securities, in order to determine our auditing procedures for the
purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and
to comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide
assurance on internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Those controls include the safeguarding of assets against
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, error or
fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any
evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to
the risk that it may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in internal control that might be material
weaknesses under standards established by the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness is a
condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the
internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low
level the risk that errors or fraud in amounts that would be
material in relation to the financial statements being audited
may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees
in the normal course of performing their assigned functions.
However, we noted no matters involving internal control and its
operation, including controls for safeguarding securities that we
consider to be material weaknesses as defined above as of July
31, 2002.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management and the Board of Trustees of the Fund and the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not intended to be and
should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.


                                                       KPMG LLP

New York, New York
September 12, 2002
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 08, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, February 08, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18I0109. PATDIAM JEWLERY PVT. LTD v. G.M. GEMS, LLC et al. .
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 15C03206
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 125 Received in Senate (RDS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 125

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 12, 2014

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for the sine die adjournment of the second session of the One 
                      Hundred Thirteenth Congress.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on any legislative day from Friday, 
December 12, 2014, through Wednesday, December 31, 2014, on a motion 
offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader 
or his designee, it stand adjourned until 1 p.m. on Friday, January 2, 
2015, or until the time of any reassembly 

              

pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs 
first; and that when the House adjourns on the legislative day of 
Friday, January 2, 2015, on a motion offered pursuant to this 
concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand 
adjourned sine die, or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to 
section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and 
that when the Senate recesses or adjourns on any day from Friday, 
December 12, 2014, through Friday, January 2, 2015, on a motion offered 
pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his 
designee, it stand adjourned sine die, or until the time of any 
reassembly pursuant to section 3 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. (a) The Speaker or his designee, after consultation with 
the Minority Leader of the House, shall notify Members of the House to 
reassemble at such place and time as he may designate if, in his 
opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
    (b) After reassembling pursuant to subsection (a), when the House 
adjourns on a motion offered pursuant to this subsection by its 
Majority Leader or his designee, the House shall again stand adjourned 
pursuant to the first section of this concurrent resolution.
    Sec. 3. (a) The Majority Leader of the Senate or his designee, 
after concurrence with the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify 
the Members of the Senate to reassemble at such place and time as he 
may designate if, in his opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
    (b) After reassembling pursuant to subsection (a), when the Senate 
adjourns on a motion offered pursuant to this subsection by its 
Majority Leader or his designee, the Senate shall again stand adjourned 
pursuant to the first section of this concurrent resolution.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 12, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 28, 2009

0420 

# Order

April 28, 2009

138087

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138087 COA: 278073 Wayne CC: 06-012922-01 CENACA BRANDON WILLIS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the December 11, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 07/16/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      150,196
COMMITMENTS
  32,579   41,154   15,706   83,811   68,636  132,096  125,496   18,100   24,700

CHANGES FROM 07/09/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,353)
     489       20     -315      835    2,498    1,009    2,204    1,344      148

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    21.7     27.4     10.5     55.8     45.7     87.9     83.6     12.1     16.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      179)
      44       46       46       63       64      130      139
```

----

Updated July 19, 2013
# C_2017421EN.01000801.xml

| 8.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/8

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Tunisia apply

(2017/C 421/05)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1).

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 (2).

2

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 101/2011.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (3).

3

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 31, 5.2.2011, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

3

---
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,**


**SECTION 1350**




In
        connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Mendocino Brewing
        Company, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
        December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
        the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yashpal Singh, Chief Executive Officer
        of the
        Company, certify, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code,
        Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date:
        April 14, 2008


/s/ Yashpal
              SinghName:
                Yashpal Singh
              Title:
                Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

JAMES VALENTINIS-DEE, 

Plaintiff,

v.

REAL ESTATE VALUE,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24-CV-51-MJT-CLS

MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE [Dkt. 5]

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and the Local Rules of Court for the Assignment of Duties to 

United States Magistrate Judges, the District Court referred this proceeding to the Honorable 

Christine L. Stetson to conduct all pretrial proceedings, to enter findings of fact and recommend 

disposition on case-dispositive matters, and to determine non-dispositive matters. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1); E.D. TEX. LOC. R. CV-72.

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed suit on February 12, 2024, alleging Defendant violated a 

contractual relationship between the parties [Dkt. 1]. On February 13, 2024, Judge Stetson ordered 

Plaintiff to pay the filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis [Dkt. 2]. That 

order and the Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Stetson were mailed to Plaintiff at his address 

of record, but both were returned as undeliverable, as Plaintiff was “no longer at this address” 

[Dkts. 3, 4]. On March 11, 2024, Judge Stetson entered a Report and Recommendation [Dkt. 5] 

advising the Court to dismiss without prejudice Plaintiff’s claims pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b), 

as Plaintiff failed to provide the Court with a current address. Plaintiff did not object to Judge 

Stetson’s Report and Recommendation and the time to do so has passed. After careful review, the 

Case 1:24-cv-00051-MJT-CLS Document 7 Filed 04/03/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 19
2

Court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the United States Magistrate Judge 

are correct.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge [Dkt. 

5] is ADOPTED. Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to FED. R. CIV.

P. 41(b). A final judgment will be entered by the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 3rd day of April, 2024.

Case 1:24-cv-00051-MJT-CLS Document 7 Filed 04/03/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 20
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 121 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 3979, 

3 the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall correct 

4 the title so as to read: ‘‘An Act to authorize appropriations 

5 for fiscal year 2015 for military activities of the Depart6 ment of Defense, for military construction, and for defense 

7 activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe mili-
2 

•HCON 121 EH 

1 tary personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other 

2 purposes.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 4, 

2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 121 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for a correction in the enrollment of the 

bill H.R. 3979.
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB of H.E.R.C.  Products
Incorporated (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
John Talkington,  Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  to my best
knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(3)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(4)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ John Talkington
--------------------------------
John Talkington
Chief Financial Officer
March 28, 2003
Jon P. WESTRUM, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD.

No. 19-7607.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21


                                G&L Realty Corp.
                              List of Subsidiaries
                                 April 30, 2001


1.   G&L Hampden, Inc., a Delaware corporation
2.   G&L Hampden, LLC a Delaware limited liability company
3.   G&L Realty Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
4.   G&L Realty Financing II, Inc., a Delaware corporation
5.   G&L Realty Financing Partnership II, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
6.   G&L Medical, Inc., a Delaware corporation
7.   G&L Gardens, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company
8.   G&L Management Delaware Corp., a Delaware corporation
9.   G&L Senior Care, Inc., a Delaware corporation
10.  G&L Medical Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
11.  GLN Capital Co. LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
12.  GL/PHP, LLC a Delaware limited liability company
13.  Theme World, L.P., a New Jersey limited partnership
14.  435 N. Roxbury Drive, Ltd., a California limited partnership
15.  G&L - Grabel San Pedro, LLC
16.  G&L Burbank, LLC
17.  G&L Burbank Managers Corp., a California corporation
18.  G&L Holy Cross, LLC
19.  G&L Holy Cross Managers Corp., a California corporation
20.  G&L Tustin, LLC
21.  G&L Tustin Managers Corp., a California corporation
22.  G&L Valencia, LLC
23.  G&L Penasquitos, LLC
24.  G&L Penasquitos, Inc.
25.  GLH Pacific Gardens, LLC
26.  GLH Pacific Gardens Corp., a California corporation
27.  G&L Hoquiam, LLC
28.  G&L Lyons, LLC
29.  G&L Coronado (1998), LLC
30.  G&L Parsons on Eagle Run, LLC
31.  G&L Parsons on Eagle Run, Inc.
32.  Lakeview Associates, LLC
33.  Tustin Heritage Park, LLC
34.  G&L Heritage Care, LLC
35.  G&L Heritage Care, Inc.
36.  G&L Massachusetts, LLC
37.  G&L Aspen, LLC