alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4496-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (FEMA-4496-DR), dated March 27, 2020, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This change occurred on May 17, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Lori A. Ehrlich, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

This action terminates the appointment of Paul F. Ford as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2022-11906 Filed 6-2-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TYLER DIVISION 

THE DAILY WIRE, LLC et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT 

OF STATE et al.,

Defendants.

 Civil Action No. 6:23-cv-00609 (JDK)

ORDER

Upon consideration of Defendants’ motion to stay all their response deadlines pending a ruling 

on Defendants’ forthcoming motion to transfer venue, ECF No. 2, and the record herein, it is hereby

ORDERED that Defendants’ motion is GRANTED; 

ORDERED that Defendants’ deadline to respond to the complaint is STAYED pending 

further order of the Court; and 

ORDERED that Defendants’ obligations to respond to any motions for a preliminary 

injunction or for expedited discovery that Plaintiffs’ may file are hereby STAYED pending further 

order of the Court.

Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 8-1 Filed 02/05/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 109
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

DICKEY’S BARBECUE RESTAURANTS, INC., 

 Defendant. 

C.A. No. 2:24-CV-00054-JRG-RSP 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF NOEL F. CHAKKALAKAL 

Please take notice that the undersigned attorney is admitted to this Court and 

hereby enters his appearance of counsel on behalf of Defendant Dickey’s Barbecue 

Restaurants, Inc. in this matter. Counsel consents to electronic service of all papers in 

this matter. 

Dated: April 11, 2024 Respectfully submitted, 

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

By: /s/ Noel F. Chakkalakal

Noel F. Chakkalakal 

Texas Bar No. 24053676 

nfc@fr.com

1717 Main Street, Suite 5000 

Dallas, Texas 75201 

Telephone (214) 747-5070 

Facsimile (214) 747-2091 

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT 

DICKEY’S BARBECUE RESTAURANTS, INC. 

Case 2:24-cv-00054-JRG-RSP Document 10 Filed 04/11/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 61
2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document has been served on April 11, 2024, to all counsel of record who are deemed to have 

consented to electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system. 

/s/ Noel F. Chakkalakal 

Noel F. Chakkalakal 

Case 2:24-cv-00054-JRG-RSP Document 10 Filed 04/11/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 62
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 90 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.90
                                         Agreed to April 8, 2014        

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR HOLOCAUST DAYS OF REMEMBRANCE 
              CEREMONY.

    Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center is authorized to be 
used on April 30, 2014, for a ceremony as part of the commemoration of 
the days of remembrance of victims of the Holocaust. Physical 
preparations for the conduct of the ceremony shall be carried out in 
accordance with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Strategic Diagnostics
Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies, based on such officer's knowledge, that:

         (i)      the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company
                  for the period ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully
                  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
                  15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
                  as amended; and

         (ii)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the
Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.


Date: May 7, 2004                                    /s/ Stanley J. Musial
      ------------                                   -------------------------
                                                     Stanley J. Musial
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.b

I, Marc N. Teal, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund V L.P.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





|November 14, 2007 | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|----------------- | ---------------------------
|                  | Marc N. Teal               
|                  | Principal Financial Officer
|                  |
Octavio ORETEGA, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al.

No. 19-7767.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
SCPW-16-0000874

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

KEONIKALEI BAGNAS, Petitioner,

vs. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Reck tenwald, C.J., Nak ayama, Mc Kenna, Po llack, an d Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner Keonikalei Bagnas’s October 2, 2016 letter, which was filed as a petition for writ of mandamus on December 20, 2016, the supplemental submissions, and the record, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate that he is being denied adequate medical treatment or that prison officials are acting with deliberate indifference to a serious medical condition. See Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 104 (1976). Petitioner, therefore, is not entitled to the requested relief. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai # i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action); Barnett v. Broderick, 84 Hawai # i 109, 111, 929 P.2d 1359, 1361 (1996 (mandamus relief is available to compel an official to perform a duty allegedly owed to an individual only Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-16-0000874 21-FEB-2017 09:17 AMif the individual’s claim is clear and certain, the official’s

duty is ministerial and so plainly prescribed as to be free from doubt, and no other remedy is available). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate court shall process the petition for writ of mandamus without payment of the filing fee.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, February 21, 2017. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
IN RE James Ernest FRYE, Petitioner.

No. 19-7884.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 6, 2020

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
James Henry SIMPSON, Petitioner, v. Martesha BISHOP, et al.

No. 19-7536.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATIONS


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Cabela’s Incorporated  (the
“registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 29, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), each
of the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to his
knowledge:





(1) the
report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
registrant.








Dated:  May
2, 2008


/s/ Dennis HighbyDennis
      HighbyPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer





/ s/ Ralph W. CastnerRalph
      W. CastnerVice
      President and Chief Financial
Officer


Back to Form 10-Q
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TEXARKANA DIVISION

LAVERNE WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

v. 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY 

ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:23-CV-68-RWS-JBB

ORDER

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, 

which recommends the above-entitled Social Security action be affirmed. Docket No. 13. Plaintiff 

Laverne Williams initiated this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of 

the denial of her application for social security benefits. Docket No. 1. The case was referred to 

United States Magistrate Judge J. Boone Baxter in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636.

Because no objections have been received, Plaintiff is barred from de novo review by the 

District Judge of the Magistrate Judge’s proposed findings, conclusions and recommendations and, 

except upon grounds of plain error, from appellate review of the unobjected-to factual findings 

and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the District Court. See Duarte v. City of Lewisville, 

Texas, 858 F.3d 348, 352 (5th Cir. 2017); Arriaga v. Laxminarayan, Case No. 4:21-CV-00203-

RAS, 2021 WL 3287683, at *1 (E.D. Tex. July 31, 2021).

The Court has reviewed the pleadings in this case and the Report of the Magistrate Judge. 

Upon such review, the Court has determined the Report of the Magistrate Judge is correct. See 

United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918 (1989) (where 

Case 5:23-cv-00068-RWS-JBB Document 14 Filed 05/31/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 550
Page 2 of 2

no objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Report are filed, the standard of review is “clearly erroneous, 

abuse of discretion and contrary to law.”). Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that the Report of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 13) is ADOPTED as the 

opinion of the District Court. It is further 

ORDERED that the above-entitled and numbered Social Security action is AFFIRMED. 

.

 

____________________________________

ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 31st day of May, 2024.

Case 5:23-cv-00068-RWS-JBB Document 14 Filed 05/31/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 551
Jeana K. REINBOLD, Chapter 7 Trustee of the Estate of 180 Equipment, LLC, Petitioner, v. FIRST MIDWEST BANK.

No. 19-870

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
# C_2017204EN.01000501.xml

| 28.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 204/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 204/5

---

Commission Notice on the date of receipt of the opinion proposing harmonised classification and labelling at EU level of glyphosate of the Committee for Risk Assessment of the European Chemicals Agency

(2017/C 204/05)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1056 (1) extended the approval period of the active substance glyphosate to 6 months from the date of receipt of the opinion of the Committee for Risk Assessment of the European Chemicals Agency by the Commission or to 31 December 2017, whichever is earlier.

1

In Recital 7 of that Regulation, the Commission stated that once it received the opinion of the Committee for Risk Assessment of the European Chemicals Agency, it would communicate the date of the receipt in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

The Commission received the Opinion of the Committee for Risk Assessment of the European Chemicals Agency proposing harmonised classification and labelling at EU level of glyphosate on 15 June 2017.

---

(1)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1056 of 29 June 2016 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 as regards the extension of the approval period of the active substance glyphosate (OJ L 173, 30.6.2016, p. 52).

1

---
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 02/26/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      177,848
COMMITMENTS
  37,741   36,002   24,464   98,077   91,842  160,282  152,309   17,566   25,540

CHANGES FROM 02/19/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -17,415)
    -504    2,340   -9,380   -3,057   -6,212  -12,942  -13,253   -4,473   -4,162

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    21.2     20.2     13.8     55.1     51.6     90.1     85.6      9.9     14.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      186)
      46       46       46       66       75      138      144
```

----

Updated March 1, 2013
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-19-00069-CR

___________________________

On Appeal from the 271st District Court

Jack County, Texas

Trial Court No. 4839

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Bassel and Womack, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth

JEFFREY DWAYNE BLANKENSHIP, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On January 31, 2020, we granted Appellant’s “Agreed Plea in Abatement and 

Motion to Remand,” abated the appeal, and remanded the case to the trial court for a 

hearing on the parties’ proposed plea agreement. Upon the filing of the supplemental 

clerk’s record on February 24, 2020, this appeal was automatically reinstated.

On February 27, 2020, Appellant filed an unopposed motion to dismiss his 

appeal. The supplemental clerk’s record reflects that on February 21, 2020, Appellant 

filed an unopposed motion to set aside the judgment, subject and contingent to the

trial court’s acceptance of the parties’ plea agreement. The trial court granted the 

motion, set aside its earlier judgment, and rendered a new judgment pursuant to the 

parties’ plea agreement.1In his motion, Appellant asks that we dismiss his case 

pursuant to the plea agreement.

We grant Appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.2(a), 43.2(f).

/s/ Bonnie Sudderth

Bonnie Sudderth

Chief Justice

Do Not Publish

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: March 5, 2020

1The trial court’s new certification of Appellant’s right of appeal reflects that 

this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal” and that “the 

defendant has waived the right of appeal.” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

_________________________________________

)

SPEECH TRANSCRIPTION, LLC, )

)

Plaintiff, ) Case: 2:23-cv-00605-JRG-RSP

)

v. ) 

)

EXABEAM, INC. ) 

)

Defendant. )

)

JOINT MOTION FOR DISMISSAL

Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), Speech Transcription, LLC moves to 

dismiss its claims with prejudice against Exabeam, Inc., with each party bearing its own 

attorneys’ fees and costs.

Date: June 11, 2024

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ René A. Vazquez

Randall Garteiser

 Texas Bar No. 24038912

 rgarteiser@ghiplaw.com

M. Scott Fuller

 Texas Bar No. 24036607

 sfuller@ghiplaw.com

GARTEISER HONEA, PLLC

119 W. Ferguson Street

Tyler, Texas 75702

Telephone: (903) 705-7420

René A. Vazquez

Virginia Bar No. 41988

rvazquez@sinergialaw.com

/s/ Eric H. Findlay

Eric H. Findlay

(Texas State Bar No. 00789886)

FINDLAY CRAFT, P.C.

7270 Crosswater Avenue, Suite B

Tyler, TX 75703

Telephone: (903) 534-1100

Facsimile: (903) 534-1137

Email: efindlay@findlaycraft.com

Brett Schuman 

BSchuman@goodwinlaw.com

GOODWIN PROCTER LLP

Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 2800

San Francisco, CA 94111

Case 2:23-cv-00605-JRG-RSP Document 13 Filed 06/11/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 108
SINERGIA TECHNOLOGY

LAW GROUP, PLLC

18295 St. Georges Ct.

Leesburg, Virginia 20176

Telephone: (703) 989-2244

Counsel for Plaintiff

Tel.: +1 415 733 6000

Fax: +1 415 677 9041

Fred Feyzi

FFeyzi@goodwinlaw.com

GOODWIN PROCTER LLP

601 Marshall Street

Redwood City, CA 94063

Tel.: +1 650 752 3100

Fax: +1 650 853 1038

Counsel for Defendant

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY on this, I caused to be electronically-filed the foregoing document

with the Clerk of Court using the Court’s CM/ECF system. As such, this document was served 

on all counsel who are deemed to have consented to electronic service.

/s/ René A. Vazquez

René A. Vazquez

CERTIFICATE OF GOOD FAITH CONFERENCE

Pursuant to Eastern District of Texas Local Rule CV-7(i), counsel has complied with the 

meet and confer requirement in Local Rule CV-7(h). The Parties have conferenced, and counsel 

is in agreement with this motion.

/s/ René A. Vazquez

René A. Vazquez

Case 2:23-cv-00605-JRG-RSP Document 13 Filed 06/11/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 109