alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 20 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating 

to contributions and expenditures with respect to elections. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 22, 2013 

Mr. MCGOVERN (for himself, Ms. PINGREE of Maine, Mr. CAPUANO, Mr. 

COHEN, Mr. CICILLINE, Mr. HOLT, Mr. MICHAUD, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. 

LANGEVIN, and Ms. SHEA-PORTER) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States relating to contributions and expenditures with 

respect to elections. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States: 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HJ 20 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. To advance the fundamental principle 

3 of political equality for all, Congress shall have power to 

4 regulate the raising and spending of money and in-kind 

5 equivalents with respect to Federal elections, including 

6 through setting limits on— 

7 ‘‘(1) the amount of contributions to candidates 

8 for nomination for election to, or for election to, 

9 Federal office; and 

10 ‘‘(2) the amount of expenditures that may be 

11 made by, in support of, or in opposition to such can12 didates. 

13 ‘‘SECTION 2. To advance the fundamental principle 

14 of political equality for all, a State shall have power to 

15 regulate the raising and spending of money and in-kind 

16 equivalents with respect to State elections, including 

17 through setting limits on— 

18 ‘‘(1) the amount of contributions to candidates 

19 for nomination for election to, or for election to, 

20 State office; and 

21 ‘‘(2) the amount of expenditures that may be 

22 made by, in support of, or in opposition to such can23 didates. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with 
3 

•HJ 20 IH 

1 ‘‘SECTION 3. Congress shall have power to implement 

2 and enforce this article by appropriate legislation.’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-93,583-01

EX P ARTE RICARDO AN TONIO RUEBE N, Applicant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 1177987-A IN THE 338TH DIS TRICT COURT

F ROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant was convicted of ag g rava ted robber y with a deadly wea

pon and sentenc ed to forty y ear s’ imprisonment. Applicant’s a ppeal to the Four

teenth Court of Appea ls was dismiss ed. Ruebe n

v. State , No. 14-10-00345- CR (Tex. App.—Houston [14t h Dist.] Fe b. 1, 2011) (not desig nated for publication). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cle rk for

war ded it to this C ourt. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant conte nds that appellate counsel wa s ineffe ctive bec ause a ppellate counsel failed to file Applicant’s brief in his direc t appea l, and appellate counsel told Applicant he neede d to ag ree to a dismiss al so that counsel co u l d fi le a writ of habea s corpus on Applicant’s behalf , which he

never did. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief

. Smith v. Robbins , 5282

U.S. 259 (2000); Ex parte Miller , 330 S.W .3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009). Acc ording ly , the rec ord should be develope d and supplemented. The trial court is the appropr iate forum for finding s of fac t. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order appellate counsel to r espond to Applicant’s claim. The trial court shall further supplement the rec ord with the Reporter ’s Record from the abate ment h ea ri ng reg arding Applicant’s appeal held in 2011. I n developing the record, the trial cour

t may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). I f the trial c ourt elec ts to hold a hear ing, it shall dete rmine whe ther Applica nt is indi g ent. I f Applica nt is indige nt and wants to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to repr esent him at the hear ing. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. I f counsel is a ppointed or reta ined, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name

. The trial court shall make finding s of fac t and conclusi o n s o f l aw as to whether appellate counsel’s perf

ormanc e was defic ient and Applicant was prejudice d. The trial court may make any other finding s and conc lusions that it deems a ppropriate in response to Applica nt’s claims. The trial court shall make findings of fac t an d conclusions of law withi n ninety day s from the date of this order

. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the trial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff idavits, motions, objections, proposed finding s and conclusions, order s, and transcr ipts from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of time must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: Mar ch 30, 2022 Do not publish
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6563

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus EDWARD R. BUTLER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, Chief District Judge. (CR-97-146-S, CA-02-561-S) Submitted: September 19, 2002 Decided: September 27, 2002 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edward R. Butler, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Michael DiBiagio, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Edward R. Butler seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000), and denying his motions for reconsideration and for recusal. We have reviewed the record and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Butler has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See United States v. Butler , Nos. CR-97-146-S; CA-02-561-S (D. Md. Feb. 22, 2002; Mar. 5 2002; Mar. 12, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                            0
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 7,910
<ALLOWANCES>                                    200 
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             13,203
<PP&E>                                      178,783
<DEPRECIATION>                               34,109   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              157,877
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        19,733
<BONDS>                                     117,956
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       118,814
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  (98,626)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                157,877   
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             15,402
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 4,601
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              1,377
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            8,034
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               1,390
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           1,390
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                  1,390 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   .11
        


</TABLE>
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

VIRTAMOVE, CORP.,

Plaintiff, Case No. 2:24-cv-00064-JRG

v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES 

CORP.,

Defendant.

DEFENDANT’S CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant International 

Business Machines Corp. (“IBM”) discloses that there is no parent corporation or publicly held 

corporation that owns 10% or more of IBM’s stock.

Dated: April 15, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Brandon H. Brown

Todd M. Friedman (pro hac vice)

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

601 Lexington Avenue

New York, NY 10022

Telephone: (212) 446-4800

Facsimile: (212) 446-4900

Email: todd.friedman@kirkland.com

Brandon H. Brown

State Bar No. 266347

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

555 California Street

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 439-1400

Facsimile: (415) 439-1500

Email: brandon.brown@kirkland.com

Of Counsel:

Andrea L. Fair

Texas State Bar No. 24078488

Case 2:24-cv-00064-JRG Document 16 Filed 04/15/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 131
2

E-mail: andrea@wsfirm.com

WARD, SMITH & HILL, PLLC

1507 Bill Owens Parkway

Longview, TX 75604

(903) 757-6400 (telephone)

(903) 757-2323 (facsimile)

Attorneys for Defendant 

International Business Machines Corp.

Case 2:24-cv-00064-JRG Document 16 Filed 04/15/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 132
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have 

consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s 

CM/ECF system pursuant to Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on April 15, 2024. 

Dated: April 15, 2024 /s/ Brandon H. Brown

Brandon H. Brown 

Case 2:24-cv-00064-JRG Document 16 Filed 04/15/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 133
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           9
<NAME>                     GreenPoint Financial Corp.
<CIK>                                      0000911935
<MULTIPLIER>                                1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                            173
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  620
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     2,281
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                              2
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                2
<LOANS>                                        10,610
<ALLOWANCE>                                      (113)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 15,325
<DEPOSITS>                                     11,307
<SHORT-TERM>                                    1,003
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               486
<LONG-TERM>                                       340
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            1
<OTHER-SE>                                      2,075
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 15,325
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   675
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 133
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   78
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  886
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                380
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                454
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             433
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     (25)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  3
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   383
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   319
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        190
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      190
<EPS-BASIC>                                      2.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    2.07
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   4.19
<LOANS-NON>                                       194
<LOANS-PAST>                                        0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 (113)
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     (34)
<RECOVERIES>                                        9
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                (113)
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             (113)
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 46 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 46

  Urging the Government of Taiwan to grant former President Chen Shui-
  bian medical parole to ensure that he receives the highest level of 
                           medical attention.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 30, 2013

 Mr. Andrews submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Urging the Government of Taiwan to grant former President Chen Shui-
  bian medical parole to ensure that he receives the highest level of 
                           medical attention.

Whereas Taiwan's democratic development is of tremendous significance globally 
        and to the Pacific region;
Whereas over the past two decades, the people of Taiwan have worked hard to 
        establish a vibrant and pluralistic democracy in their country and 
        conducted five successful presidential elections, successive elections 
        for members of their national legislature, numerous local elections, and 
        two national referendums;
Whereas since the administration of the Kuomintang Nationalists came to office 
        in 2008, a large number of investigations and prosecutions led by the 
        Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) have been brought against officials 
        from the previous administration, including former President Chen Shui-
        bian;
Whereas most of these prosecutions were politically motivated, in an apparent 
        pattern of political score-settling;
Whereas the health of former President Chen, who is serving a 19-year prison 
        sentence, has deteriorated markedly in the past two years;
Whereas concerned foreign dignitaries and human rights activists from the United 
        States and Europe have visited former President Chen in jail since the 
        summer of 2012;
Whereas former President Chen has not been able to receive adequate medical 
        treatment in accordance with his wishes, such as selecting either 
        doctors or hospitals, and has not been able to have complete access to 
        his medical records; and
Whereas section 2(c) of the Taiwan Relations Act (22 U.S.C. 3301(c)) declares 
        that ``[t]he preservation and enhancement of the human rights of all the 
        people of Taiwan are hereby reaffirmed as objectives of the United 
        States.'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress urges the Government of Taiwan to grant former President 
Chen Shui-bian medical parole to ensure that he receives the highest 
level of medical attention, effective immediately.
                                 <all>
```
# CI2017346EN.01000301.xml

| 16.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 346/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 346/3

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea apply

(2017/C 346 I/02)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 (2).

2

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/1509.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil the listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with Section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (3).

3

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 224, 31.8.2017, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

3

---
Ernest J. FRANCESCHI, Jr., petitioner, v. Betty T. YEE, et al.

Keith DeOrio, petitioner, v. Betty T. Yee, et al.

No. 18-585.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 02-1244

DONALD N. CREIGHTON,

Petitioner, Appellant,

v.

TIMOTHY HALL, SUPERINTENDENT OF MCI NORFOLK;

THOMAS REILLY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MASSACHUSETTS,

Respondents, Appellees.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of the Court issued on November 6, 2002, is

amended as follows:

On p.14, last line of footnote 4, insert "1st. Cir."

within parentheses before 2002; thus, (1st Cir. 2002).
Robert W. JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.

No. 19-7295.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Amendment to Employment Agreement dater May 8, 2012 with Henry fuchs



 Exhibit 10.6 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) made as of May 8, 2012 (“Effective
Date”) by and between BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Henry J. Fuchs (“Employee”). 
  

	1.	This Amendment No. 1 is intended to amend and modify that certain Employment Agreement by and between the Company and Employee dated March 2, 2009 (the
“Agreement”). The Agreement, together with this Amendment, shall constitute a single agreement. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Agreement. Except as
expressly modified by this Amendment, the Agreement shall remaining full force and effect according to its terms. 

  

	2.	The defined term “Termination Compensation,” as provided in Section 7(c) of the Agreement, is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety by the
following definition: 

 Termination Compensation. For purposes of this Agreement, the term
“Termination Compensation” shall mean: (i) one hundred forty-five percent (145%) of the Employee’s then current annual base salary which shall be payable in a lump sum within two weeks after separation of employment,
conditioned on Employee executing the Company’s standard form severance and release agreement, and shall be subject to customary withholding and other applicable payroll processes. Employee shall execute the Company’s standard form
severance and release agreement within sixty (60) days after the Employee’s termination. 
  

	3.	This Amendment No. 1 may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and
the same instrument. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Amendment have executed this Amendment as of the
date first written above. 
  

							
	BIOMARIN PHARMACEUTICAL INC.	  	EMPLOYEE
				
	By:	 	 /s/ Jean-Jacques Bienaimé
	  	By:	 	 /s/ Henry J. Fuchs

	Name:	 	Jean-Jacques Bienaimé	  		 	Henry J. Fuchs
	Its:	 	Chief Executive Officer