alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 22 

 

Case 2:23-cv-00576-JRG-RSP Document 26-31 Filed 01/29/24 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1417
1/19/24, 12:50 AM Cris Lacy - VP A&R - Warner Music Nashvile | LinkedIn

https://www.linkedin.com/in/cris-lacy-508998120 1/4

Experience

View Cris’ full profile

See who you know in common

Cris Lacy

VP A&R at Warner Music Nashvile

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

37 followers · 1 connection

See your mutual connections

Sign in to connect

Warner Music Nashvile

VP A&R

Warner Music Nashvile

Case 2:23-cv-00576-JRG-RSP Document 26-31 Filed 01/29/24 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 1418
1/19/24, 12:50 AM Cris Lacy - VP A&R - Warner Music Nashvile | LinkedIn

https://www.linkedin.com/in/cris-lacy-508998120 2/4

Get introduced

Contact Cris directly

Sign in to view full profile

People also viewed

Nashville, TN

Shannen Stewart

Connect

Nashville, TN

Toni Y. Hickey

Connect

Sr. Director, A&R at Sony Music Nashville

Nashville, TN

Jason McColl

Connect

Managing Director, NY at FBMM Inc

New York, NY

Carmen Romano

Case 2:23-cv-00576-JRG-RSP Document 26-31 Filed 01/29/24 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 1419
1/19/24, 12:50 AM Cris Lacy - VP A&R - Warner Music Nashvile | LinkedIn

https://www.linkedin.com/in/cris-lacy-508998120 3/4

Show more profiles 

Explore collaborative articles

Connect

Agent at Creative Artists Agency

Nashville, TN

Jeff Krones

Connect

Vice President, Artist & Industry Relations; Board Administration & Governance at Academy of Country

Music

Nashville, TN

Tommy Moore

Connect

--

Los Angeles, CA

Aaron Bay-Schuck

Connect

Senior VP & General Manager - Nashville at Warner Chappell Music

Nashville Metropolitan Area

Phil May

Connect

Senior Vice President A&R at Columbia Records

New York City Metropolitan Area

Justin Eshak

Connect

Senior Vice President of A&R at Columbia Records

Jersey City, NJ

Imran Majid

Connect

Case 2:23-cv-00576-JRG-RSP Document 26-31 Filed 01/29/24 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 1420
1/19/24, 12:50 AM Cris Lacy - VP A&R - Warner Music Nashvile | LinkedIn

https://www.linkedin.com/in/cris-lacy-508998120 4/4

We’re unlocking community knowledge in a new way. Experts add insights directly into each article, started with the

help of AI.

Explore More

© 2024 About

Accessibility User Agreement

Privacy Policy Your California Privacy Choices

Cookie Policy Copyright Policy

Brand Policy Guest Controls

Community Guidelines Language

Case 2:23-cv-00576-JRG-RSP Document 26-31 Filed 01/29/24 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 1421
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.

Defendant

To: 

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

Eastern District of Texas Headwater Partners II LLC 2:24-cv-00007-JRG-RSP 01/09/2024 /s/ Paul A. Kroeger Paul A. Kroeger CA Bar No. 229074

Russ August & Kabat 

12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90025 pkroeger@raklaw.com (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

Plaintiff

v.

Verizon Communications Inc. et al

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Headwater Partners II LLC

Case 2:24-cv-00007-JRG-RSP Document 15 Filed 01/09/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 251
Bryshun Genard FURLOW, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7007.

Supreme Court of the United States.

June 1, 2020

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Rehaif* v. *United States* , 588 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 2191, 204 L.Ed.2d 594 (2019).
THOMAS GROSS , Petitioner,

v.
STATE OF FLORIDA , Respondent. ___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
C ASE NO. 1D 14

- 2656

Opinion filed September 16, 2014.
Petition for Belated Appeal

-- Original Jurisdiction

. Thomas Gross, pro se , Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kristen Bonjour, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respo ndent.

PER CURIAM. The petition seeking a belated appeal of the order denying motion for postconviction relief rendered December 19, 2013, in Duval County Circuit Court case
number 16

- 2009

- CF

- 009828

- AXXX

- MA is granted. Upon issuance of mandate, a

copy o f this opinion shall be furnished to the clerk of the lower tribunal for treatment as a notice of appeal. PADOVANO, THOMAS, and ROBERTS, JJ. , CONCUR.
Steven MASON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8222.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
Bellur G. Shiva PRASAD, Petitioner, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al.

No. 19-951.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Charles Ben BOUNDS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8129.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS REQUIRED BYSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof Steinway Musical Instruments, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dennis M. Hanson, Senior Executive VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that to the bestof my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.
|        |   | /s/ DENNIS M. HANSON                |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                |
|   |   | Senior Executive Vice President and |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer             |
|   |   | (Principal Financial Officer)       |

 

May 9, 2006

----
### NUMBER 13
- 18 - 00 609 - CV 

## COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ PETER KRUMP , A ppellant ,

v.
KATHRYN GONZALEZ , A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 347th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides Appellant Peter Crump attempted to appeal a judgment entered by the 347th District Court of Nueces County on August 14, 2018. On October 31, 2018, the Clerk of this Court requested appellant to pay the filing fee for the notice of appeal within ten days.
On Novem ber 19, 2018 , the Clerk of this Court notified appellant , in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c), that he was delinquent in paying the filing fee2

and that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $ 205.00 filing fee was paid. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 42.3(c)

. Appellant has not responded to the notice from the Clerk or paid the filing fee. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 5 ; id. R. 12.1(b). Further, appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record or the reporter’s record.
The Court , having considered the documents on file and appellant ’ s failure to pay the filing fee , is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed. See id. R. 42.3(b),(c). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSE D for want of prosecution.

GINA M. BENAVIDES , Justi ce

D elivered and filed the 31st day of Jan uary , 20 19

.
AO 399 (01/09) Waiver of the Service of Summons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To:

(Name of the plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint,

two copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you. 

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case. 

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service. 

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within

60 days from , the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the

United States). If I fail to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date:

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

Printed name of party waiving service of summons Printed name

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a summons

and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff located in

the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure.

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the plaintiff

and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been served.

60 days from , the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the

United States). If I fail to do so, a default judgment 

 Eastern District of Texas

Hanshow Technology Co., Ltd. et al.

SES-imagotag SA et al.

2:23-CV-00617

Mr. Hao Tan (Arch & Lake LLP)

01/05/2024

01/09/2024

SES-imagotag SA

/s/C. Gregory Gramenopoulos

C. Gregory Gramenopoulos

Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner, LLP

 901 New York Avenue, NW

 Washington, DC 20001-4413

c.gregory.gramenopoulos@finnegan.com

(202) 408-4000

Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 6 Filed 01/10/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 311
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Joseph J. Lodovic, IV, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of MediaNews Group, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: September 26, 2005/S/ Joseph J. Lodovic, IV
IN RE David Roland HINKSON, Petitioner

No. 18-9542

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
S. Bruce HIRAN, et al., Petitioners v. JELINIS, LLC.

No. 19-112

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District denied.
<PAGE>
 
EXHIBIT 11
----------


                   MECKLERMEDIA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                   -----------------------------------------

          STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)
          ------------------------------------------------------------

             FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
             -----------------------------------------------------

                   (In thousands, except per share amounts)
                   ----------------------------------------

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              1997       1996        1995    
                                             ------    -------     -------   
<S>                                          <C>       <C>         <C>       
NET INCOME (LOSS)                            $3,744    ($3,868)    ($1,275)  
                                             ======    =======     =======   
                                                                             
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES                                               
   OUTSTANDING                                8,507      8,422       7,306   
                                                                             
DILUTIVE STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS             255          -           -   
                                             ------    -------     ------- 

TOTAL PRIMARY COMMON SHARES AND                                              
   EQUIVALENTS                                8,762      8,422       7,306   
                                             ======    =======     =======     

PRIMARY EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE     $ 0.43     ($0.46)     ($0.17)  
                                             ======    =======     =======     
</TABLE>

Fully diluted earnings per common share has not been presented on the basis that
the difference between fully diluted and primary earnings per common share is
less than $0.01.

                                 38
Hye-Young PARK, Petitioner, v. Charles SECOLSKY, et al.

No. 19-7135.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 27, 2020

Petition for rehearing denied.
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 01/29/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       89,369
COMMITMENTS
   6,893    6,828        0   77,601   79,940   84,494   86,768    4,875    2,601

CHANGES FROM 01/22/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      4,436)
      64      800      -64    4,810    3,698    4,810    4,434     -374        2

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     7.7      7.6      0.0     86.8     89.4     94.5     97.1      5.5      2.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       77)
       9        9        0       37       35       46       44
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 01/29/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      170,875
COMMITMENTS
  40,745   19,912    1,346  113,189  145,971  155,280  167,229   15,595    3,646

CHANGES FROM 01/22/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,087)
   1,455     -935      -73      884    3,311    2,266    2,303     -179     -216

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    23.8     11.7      0.8     66.2     85.4     90.9     97.9      9.1      2.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      133)
      38       13        4       64       37      105       51
```

----

Updated February 1, 2013
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-23-2022]

An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board by CODEZOL, C.D., grantee of FTZ 163, requesting subzone status for the facility of Petro Air Corporation, located in Carolina, Puerto Rico. The application was submitted pursuant to the provisions of the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), and the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400). It was formally docketed on May 31, 2022.

The proposed subzone (0.80 acres) is located at World Fuel—Petro Air Facility, PR-26 LMM Airport, Calle José Santana Interior, Carolina, Puerto Rico. No authorization for production activity has been requested at this time.

In accordance with the FTZ Board's regulations, Camille Evans of the FTZ Staff is designated examiner to review the application and make recommendations to the FTZ Board.

                    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions shall be addressed to the FTZ Board's Executive Secretary and sent to:                     *ftz@trade.gov.*                     The closing period for their receipt is July 18, 2022. Rebuttal comments in response to material submitted during                           ( print page 34241)                        the foregoing period may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period to August 1, 2022.                

                    A copy of the application will be available for public inspection in the “Online FTZ Information Section” section of the FTZ Board's website, which is accessible via                     *www.trade.gov/​ftz.*

                    For further information, contact Camille Evans at                     *Camille.Evans@trade.gov.*

Dated: May 31, 2022.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-12081 Filed 6-3-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
EXHIBIT 99.20




CONSENT OF EXPERT
   March 28, 2013
   Eldorado Gold Corporation
  United States Securities and Exchange Commission
  Ladies and Gentlemen:
  Re: Eldorado Gold Corporation
  I, Tony Jackson, do hereby consent to the filing of the written disclosure regarding the technical report entitled the “Certej Updated Definitive Feasibility Study” dated February 26, 2009 and of extracts from or a summary of the technical report and other information pertaining to the project, and the use of my name in the Annual Information Form and Annual Report on Form 40-F of Eldorado Gold Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2012 and any amendments thereto and any Registration Statement on Form S-8 incorporating by reference the Company’s Annual Information Form and Annual Report on Form 40-F.
  By:
/s/  Tony JacksonTony Jackson, FIMMM

TJ Metallurgical Services Ltd.
David ABARA, Petitioner, v. Jack PALMER, Warden, et al.

No. 19-6912

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Waiver by Bruce J Barclay



 Exhibit 10.84 
 February 9, 2012 
 Board of Directors 

Hansen Medical, Inc. 
 800 East Middlefield Road

 Mountain View, CA 94043 
 Dear Sirs:

 I hereby voluntarily relinquish any rights to a cash incentive bonus in respect of Hansen Medical, Inc.’s 2012 fiscal
year and agree that in lieu of a cash incentive bonus opportunity in respect of the Company’s 2012 fiscal year I will be eligible for a performance restricted stock unit covering 70,050 shares of the Company’s common stock, which units
will vest based on the Company’s Corporate 2012 Critical Success Factors approved by the Board. I acknowledge and agree that this change will not constitute “Good Reason,” nor will it be considered to be a “Good Reason
Event,” under the Retention Agreement, dated May 26, 2010, between me and the Company. 
  

	
	Very truly yours,
	
	/s/ Bruce J Barclay
	Bruce J Barclay