alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA '

'

'

versus ' NO. 1:23-Cr-125

'

'

JAMES RICHARD ROLLINS '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Hawthorn conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed 

by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued his Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. The magistrate 

judge recommended that the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. He further 

recommended that the court adjudge the Defendant guilty on Count One of the Superseding 

Indictment filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to the magistrate judge’s findings. The court ORDERS 

that the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate 

Judge are ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the 

plea agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, James Richard Rollins, is 

Case 1:23-cr-00125-MAC-ZJH Document 46 Filed 12/02/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:

128
2

adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Superseding Indictment charging a violation of 18 

U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B) and (b)(2) - Possession of Child Pornography.

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 2nd day of December, 2024.

Case 1:23-cr-00125-MAC-ZJH Document 46 Filed 12/02/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:

129
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: November 21, 2005
    By  /s/ Diane D. LappDiane D. LappInterim Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 11

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-12 Filed 09/27/23 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 190
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-12 Filed 09/27/23 Page 2 of 12 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-12 Filed 09/27/23 Page 3 of 12 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-12 Filed 09/27/23 Page 4 of 12 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-12 Filed 09/27/23 Page 5 of 12 PageID #: 
Page 5 

P-CSCF I-CSCF HSS 

1. Register

2. Register

3. Cx-Query/Cx-Select-Pull

UE 

Visited Network Home Netwo

4. Cx-Query Resp/Cx-Select-

7. Cx

5. Register

9. 200 OK

10. 200 OK

11. 200 OK

6. Cx

Figure 5.1: Registration – User not registe

1. After the UE has obtained IP connectivity, it can perform the 

the UE sends the Register information flow to the proxy (PubUser Identity, home network domain name, UE IP address, InSupport Indication). 

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-12 Filed 09/27/23 Page 6 of 12 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-12 Filed 09/27/23 Page 7 of 12 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-12 Filed 09/27/23 Page 8 of 12 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-12 Filed 09/27/23 Page 9 of 12 PageID #: 
Page 9 

[7f] identifying a particular protocol specific registration process from a number of protocol specific registration processes; 

The interoperability node identifies a particular protocol specific renumber of protocol specific registration processes. As discussed in [7d] above, the protocol specific registration procesaccess that the station has. “3.2.1 VoLTE UE Attachment and IMS Registration 3.2.1.1 General A VoLTE UE, under LTE coverage, shall automatically perform an IMS registration for VoLTE, if the network supports VoLTE (for fuconditions for IMS registration see section 2.2.1 of GSMA IR.92 [5VoLTE UE shall be available for VoLTE services (i.e. incoming casupplementary services), similar to the voice experience in today's C

Source: https://www.gsma.com/futurenetworks/wp-content/uploads

Service-Description-and-Implementation-Guidelines-Version-2.0.p“3.2.1.3 Detailed Description VoLTE UE Attach .... The MME sends an Attach Accept to the eNodeB with the IMS-AP

QoS parameters, PCO, IMS Voice over PS supported indication, TAcontainer, etc. The eNodeB communicates with the UE to update thincludes the information received from the core network as part of tThe UE sends the Attach Complete message to the eNodeB, which this time, the UE is capable of sending uplink packets. The MME inRequest to the SGW including the EPS Bearer Identity, eNodeB adThe SGW acknowledges the request to the MME and is capable of At this stage, the VoLTE UE is attached to the network via a defaulfor IMS Signalling.” Source: https://www.gsma.com/futurenetworks/wp-content/uploads

Service-Description-and-Implementation-Guidelines-Version-2.0.p

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-12 Filed 09/27/23 Page 10 of 12 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-12 Filed 09/27/23 Page 11 of 12 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-12 Filed 09/27/23 Page 12 of 12 PageID #:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000918904
<NAME> THE SELMER COMPANY INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-02-1999
<CASH>                                           3,879
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   90,328
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,154
<INVENTORY>                                     95,043
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               190,835
<PP&E>                                         114,724
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,757
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 327,347
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,819
<BONDS>                                        144,564
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     108,198
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   327,347
<SALES>                                        229,878
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               229,878
<CGS>                                          156,285
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,504
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,630
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   150
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,002
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,307
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,952
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,355
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,355
<EPS-BASIC>                                  13,355.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                13,355.00


</TABLE>
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

OCTOBER 5, 2009

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 09-11703

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 97-00364-CR-1-MHS-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PETER UNAKALU,

a.k.a. Eromsele Hakeem,

a.k.a. Omokehinde Lawrence,

a.k.a. Patrick Eromesele,

a.k.a. Gabirel Ujochokw Ezenia,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

_________________________

(October 5, 2009)

Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Peter Unakalu appeals his sentence of 24 months’ imprisonment imposed

following the district court’s revocation of his supervised release, pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3583(e). After imposing sentence, the court failed to elicit the parties’

objections, if any, as required by United States v. Jones, 899 F.2d 1097, 1102 (11

th

Cir. 1990), overruled in part on other grounds, United States v. Morrill, 984 F.2d

1136 (11 Cir. 1993). We therefore vacate Unakalu’s sentence and remand the

th

case with the instruction that the district court, in sentencing the defendant, elicit

the parties’ objections in accordance with Jones.

VACATED and REMANDED, with instruction.

2
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (i) on Form S-8 (No. 333-68221)
pertaining to registration of shares under the Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan and shares under Stone Container Corporation option plans converted to
Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation shares in the merger agreement; (ii) on Form S-8 (No. 33-57085) pertaining to registration of shares under the
Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation 1992 Stock Option Plan; (iii) on Form S-8 (No. 333-31961) pertaining to registration of additional shares under the
Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation 1992 Stock Option Plan; (iv) on Form S-8 (No. 333-47143) pertaining to the registration of shares under the
Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation Management Incentive Plan; (v) on Form S-8 (No. 333-32850) pertaining to the registration of shares under the
Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation Hourly Savings Plan, the Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation Savings Plan, the Jefferson Smurfit Corporation Hourly Savings Plan and the Smurfit Packaging
Corporation Savings Plan (vi) on Form S-4 (No. 333-43656) pertaining to registration of shares under the Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation Preferred
Stock Plan; (vii) on Form S-8 (No. 333-58018) pertaining to registration of shares under the St. Laurent Paperboard Hourly Savings Plan; and
(viii) on Form S-8 (No. 333-63450) pertaining to registration of additional shares under the Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation 1998 Long-Term
Incentive Plan, of our report dated January 29, 2003, except for paragraph 1 of Note 2 and paragraph 5 of Note 19 as to which the date is February 20, 2003,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2002.

| |  |                                      
| |  | -------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ERNST & YOUNG LLPErnst & Young LLP

St.
Louis, Missouri
March 6, 2003

---

QuickLinks
IN RE Steven BEEBE, Petitioner.

No. 19-7944.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TEXARKANA DIVISION

OPTIMORPHIX, INC., 

 Plaintiff,

v. 

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., 

Defendant. 

Civil Action No. 5:23-cv-126-RWS-JBB 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

OPTIMORPHIX, INC., 

 Plaintiff,

v. 

AMAZON.COM, INC. AND AMAZON WEB

SERVICES,INC., 

Defendants. 

Civil Action No. 5:23-cv-123 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

OPTIMORPHIX, INC., 

 Plaintiff,

v. 

BROADCOM INC., 

Defendant. 

Civil Action No. 5:23-cv-134 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

OPTIMORPHIX, INC., 

 Plaintiff,

v. 

MICROSOFT CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

Civil Action No. 5:23-cv-150 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER GRANTING AGREED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINES AND

CONTINUATION OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

Case 5:23-cv-00134-RWS-JBB Document 18 Filed 02/02/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 351
Before the Court is Plaintiff OptiMorphix, Inc.’s Agreed Motion for Extension of 

Deadlines and Continuation of Scheduling Conferences. Cause No. 5:23-cv-123, Dkt. No. 

19; Cause No. 5:23-cv-126, Dkt. No. 20; Cause No. 5:23-cv-134, Dkt. No. 17; and 

Cause No. 5:23-cv-150, Dkt. No. 13. The Court, having considered the motion and noting it 

is unopposed, is of the opinion the motion should be and hereby is GRANTED. 

Accordingly, the Court hereby CONTINUES the scheduling conferences and all current 

deadlines set in the 5:23-cv-123, 5:23-cv-126, and 5:23-cv-134 matters until further Order of the

Court. The Court will set a joint scheduling conference after the final defendant, Microsoft 

Corporation, answers or otherwise responds to the Complaint, which is currently set for March 12, 

2024, in 5:23-cv-150. This will allow all Parties to participate in the meet and confer process and 

propose a joint case schedule to the Court. 

.

____________________________________

J. Boone Baxter

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

SIGNED this the 2nd day of February, 2024.

Case 5:23-cv-00134-RWS-JBB Document 18 Filed 02/02/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 352
EX-10.(b)




	
	EXHIBIT 10(b)

 AMENDMENT TO THE VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY UNFUNDED SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFIT PLAN FOR 

SALARIED EMPLOYEES 
  

 
 The Vulcan Materials Company Unfunded Supplemental Benefit
Plan for Salaried Employees, effective January 1, 2005, is hereby clarified by adding the following section 6.5: 
 6.5    Special Calculation.   The Supplemental Retirement Benefit of Donald James (or, for purposes of Section 6.2(b), his spouse) (“Mr. James’
Benefit”) is limited under this Section 6.5 as follows. On and after the date on which Mr. James attains forty (40) years of “Benefit Service” under the Retirement Plan, taking into account service credited
under the Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement (dated September 28, 2001, and as amended) (the “Service Cap”), the service used to determine Mr. James’ Benefit shall be frozen. Accordingly, after meeting the
Service Cap, Mr. James’ Benefit shall be determined based on the amount service credited under this Plan at the time the Service Cap is met; however, Mr. James’ Benefit shall continue to be adjusted thereafter by all other
applicable factors, such as changes in this compensation and changes in the benefits provided by the Retirement Plan. 
  

	
	VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY
	
	By: /s/ Philip J. Carroll, Jr.
	       Philip J. Carroll, Jr.
       Chairman of the Compensation Committee



 AGREED: 
 /s/ Donald M. James

 Donald M. James 
 Participant 

  
 Exhibit 10(b)
Jonathon Loyd EDICK, Petitioner v. MICHIGAN

No. 18-9820

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                         125,769
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,639,589
<ALLOWANCES>                                   188,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,654,621
<PP&E>                                       3,233,993
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,487,873
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,846,668
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,583,686
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    737,397
<COMMON>                                        91,873
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,357,391)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,846,688
<SALES>                                     22,958,814
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,958,814
<CGS>                                       18,642,887
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,642,887
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,021,757
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             379,656
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,085,486)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,062
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,086,548)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,086,548)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[GRAPHIC OMITTED]
    PALATIN
  TECHNOLOGIES

FOR RELEASE MARCH 14, 2000 AT 7:30 AM EST
Contact:     Allen & Caron Inc.               Palatin Technologies
             Mark Alvino (investors)                   Edward J. Quilty
             (212)698-1360                             Chairman & CEO
             mark@allencaron.com                       (609)520-1911

             Kari Rinkeviczie (media)         Stephen T. Wills
             (616) 647-0780                            Chief Financial Officer
             acikari@aol.com                           (609)520-1911


PALATIN TECHNOLOGIES WILL DISCONTINUE PROPOSED MERGER
WITH MOLECULAR BIOSYSTEMS


PRINCETON, NJ (MARCH 14, 2000)....Palatin Technologies Inc (AMEX:PTN) announced
today that it will not be extending the merger consummation date of March 31,
2000 for its previously announced proposed merger with San Diego-based Molecular
Biosystems, Inc. (OTCBB:MBIO) and will not be proceeding with the merger.
Palatin's decision not to proceed with the merger is based on management's view
that the merger is not currently in the best interests of its stockholders.


Statements about the Company's future expectations, including development and
regulatory plans, and all other statements in this document other than
historical facts, are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section
27A of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995. The Company intends that such forward-looking statements be subject to
the safe harbors created thereby. Since these statements involve risks and
uncertainties and are subject to change at any time, the Company's actual
results could differ materially from expected results.

                                     # # # #
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 12/17/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      687,079
COMMITMENTS
  99,964    7,467  200,703  362,745  462,983  663,412  671,153   23,666   15,925

CHANGES FROM 12/10/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -26,837)
   1,814   -5,414  -15,460  -11,183   -3,440  -24,828  -24,314   -2,009   -2,524

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    14.5      1.1     29.2     52.8     67.4     96.6     97.7      3.4      2.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      145)
      50       21       57       69       62      139      122
```

----

Updated December 20, 2013
William M. EATON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6680.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 5, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
##### 



Exhibit 10.1
 AMENDMENT NO. 4
TO STANDARD COMMERCIAL LEASE
 THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT TO STANDARD COMMERCIAL LEASE ( Airport One Limited Partnership Landlord Navarre Corporation Tenant
 W I T N E S S E T H:
 WHEREAS Lease" th
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE
 Premises
 Term
 Base Rent CPI Index
 Permitted Use
 Pro-Rata Share




---



##### 



Definition of Operating Expenses
             Late Payment Charge th th
 Signs




---



##### 



Warranty of Possession
  Right of Access
 Building Services
 Landlord Repairs
  Tenant Damages
 Hold Harmless
  Tenant Assignment




---



##### 



Act of God
  Removal of Demising Wall; Delivery of the Expansion Space




---



##### 








---



##### 



LANDLORD
    
    TENANTAIRPORT ONE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
    
    NAVARRE CORPORATIONBy: /s/ Brad Hoyt
    
    By: /s/ John TurnerIts: General Partner
    
    Its: Sr. V. P. Global Logistics
# C_2017052EN.01000201.xml

| 18.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/2

---

Notice for the attention of the persons, entities and bodies to which restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/101/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/288 and in Council Regulation (EC) No 314/2004 concerning restrictive measures against Zimbabwe apply

(2017/C 52/02)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons, entities and bodies that appear in Annex I to Council Decision 2011/101/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/288 (2), and in Annex III to Council Regulation (EC) No 314/2004 (3), concerning restrictive measures against Zimbabwe.

1

2

3

The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons, entities and bodies that appear in the abovementioned Annexes should continue to be included in the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2011/101/CFSP and in Regulation (EC) No 314/2004.

The attention of the persons, entities and bodies concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 314/2004 in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 7 of the Regulation).

The persons, entities and bodies concerned may submit a request to the Council before 1 November 2017, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the abovementioned list should be reconsidered. Any such request should be sent to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the persons, entities and bodies concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 42, 16.2.2011, p. 6.

1

(2)  OJ L 42, 18.2.2017, p. 11.

2

(3)  OJ L 55, 24.2.2004, p. 1.

3

---