alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Joseph Llewellyn WORRELL, Petitioner, v. EMIGRANT MORTGAGE COMPANY, et al.

No. 19-7655.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF AFRICAN AMERICAN-OWNED MEDIA, et al.

No. 18-1185.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Comcast Corp.* v. *National Assn. of African American-Owned Media* , 589 U.S. ---- (2020). The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Miguel ESPARZA-SALAZAR, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5279

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 11/05/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       83,828
COMMITMENTS
  27,173    2,119    3,551   46,451   75,904   77,175   81,574    6,653    2,254

CHANGES FROM 10/29/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        421)
     -86     -267     -254      364      799       24      278      397      143

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    32.4      2.5      4.2     55.4     90.5     92.1     97.3      7.9      2.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       85)
      16        4        1       42       42       58       47
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 11/05/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      270,205
COMMITMENTS
  87,014   31,498    1,238  166,860  232,714  255,112  265,450   15,093    4,755

CHANGES FROM 10/29/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,793)
  -1,829   -2,815       98   -2,243      135   -3,974   -2,582    2,181      789

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    32.2     11.7      0.5     61.8     86.1     94.4     98.2      5.6      1.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      179)
      59       21       12       77       53      142       80
```

----

Updated November 8, 2013
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 544 

Congratulating the Navy Dental Corps on its 100th anniversary. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 2, 2012 

Mr. MANCHIN (for himself and Mr. COBURN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the Navy Dental Corps on its 100th 

anniversary. 

Whereas on August 22, 1912, Congress passed an Act recognizing Navy dentistry as a distinct branch among naval 

medical professions; 

Whereas in the last century, the Navy Dental Corps has supported the Navy by sustaining Sailor and Marine readiness and providing routine and emergency dental care, 

ashore and afloat, in peace and in war; 

Whereas the Navy Dental Corps works continuously to improve the health of Sailors, Marines, and their families 

by supporting individual and community prevention initiatives, good oral hygiene practices, and treatment; 

Whereas the Navy Dental Corps endeavors to improve oral 

health worldwide by participating in the spectrum of miliVerDate Mar 15 2010 08:37 Aug 03, 2012 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR544.ATS SR544

emcdonald on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 544 ATS 

tary combat, peacekeeping, and humanitarian operations 

and exercises; 

Whereas the Navy Dental Corps, in collaboration with national and international dental organizations, promotes 

dental professionalism and quality of care; 

Whereas the Navy Dental Corps supports the mission of the 

Federal dental research program and endorses improved 

dental technologies and therapies through research and 

adherence to sound scientific principles; and 

Whereas the Navy Dental Corps recognizes the importance of 

continuing professional dental education, requiring and 

supporting specialty dental education and postgraduate 

residencies and fellowships for its members: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) congratulates the Navy Dental Corps on its 

3 100th anniversary; 

4 (2) commends the Navy Dental Corps for work5 ing to sustain the dental readiness and the oral 

6 health of a superb fighting force; and 

7 (3) recognizes the thousands of dentists who 

8 have served in the Navy Dental Corps over the last 

9 100 years, providing dental care to millions of mem10 bers of the Armed Forces and their families. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Matthew F. THYBERG, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9333.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Molly TSAI, Petitioner, v. Robert WILKIE, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

No. 19-7956.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 17-3662

___________________________

Janice Jones

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Robert K. Cox, Administrative Law Judge; Jacqueline E. Crawford-Apperson,

Vocational Expert; David G. Buell, Administrative Law Judge; Nancy A.

Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Nebraska - Omaha

____________

 Submitted: August 20, 2018

Filed: August 23, 2018

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, GRUENDER, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.
Janice Jones appeals from the order of the district court affirming the

1

Commissioner’s denial of her applications for disability insurance benefits and

supplemental security income. Liberally construing Jones’s pro se filings as

challenging the administrative law judge’s (ALJ’s)residual functional capacity (RFC)

determination, we conclude thatsubstantial evidence supportsthe ALJ’s RFC finding

and his ultimate conclusion thatJones was not disabled. See Andrews v. Colvin, 791

F.3d 923, 928 (8th Cir. 2015) (standard of review). As to Jones’s claim that her

hearing was deficient and conducted unprofessionally, we conclude thatJones failed

to demonstrate that any alleged error was not harmless. See Byes v. Astrue, 687 F.3d

2

913, 917 (8th Cir. 2012) (to show error is not harmless, claimant must provide some

indication that ALJ would have decided differently if error had not occurred). The

judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

The Honorable Robert F. Rossiter, Jr., United States District Judge for the

1

District of Nebraska.

We need not address Jones’s additional contention that an administrative 2

appeals judge “prejudged” her, as she raises this issue for the first time on appeal. 

See Hepp v. Astrue, 511 F.3d 798, 806 (8th Cir. 2008) (issue is waived if claimant

does not raise it before district court).

-2-
Dale SHOOP, Petitioner v. Ralph TERRY, Acting Warden.

No. 18-9239

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Michelle Renee LAMB, Petitioner v. Joe NORWOOD, et al.

No. 19-5245

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [S-39-2022]

On March 25, 2022, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the KOM Foreign Trade Zone Authority, grantee of FTZ 189, requesting subzone status subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 189, on behalf of GHSP Inc., in Grand Haven, Hart and Holland, Michigan.

                    The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and Regulations, including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (87 FR 18765, March 31, 2022). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed the application and determined that it meets the criteria for approval. Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board Executive Secretary (15 CFR 400.36(f)), the application to establish Subzone 189F was approved on May 26, 2022, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.13, and further subject to FTZ 189's 2,000-acre activation limit.                

Dated: May 26, 2022.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-11865 Filed 6-2-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY, et al. v. Greg ABBOTT, Governor of Texas, et al.

No. 19A1055

Supreme Court of the United States.

June 26, 2020

The application to vacate stay presented to Justice ALITO and by him referred to the Court is denied.

Statement of Justice SOTOMAYOR respecting the denial of application to vacate stay.

This application raises weighty but seemingly novel questions regarding the Twenty-Sixth Amendment. I do not disagree with the decision to refrain from addressing them for the first time here, in the context of an emergency application to vacate a stay of an injunction. But I hope that the Court of Appeals will consider the merits of the legal issues in this case well in advance of the November election.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-2150

THOMAS L. SWITZER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MARSHA GARST,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, District

Judge. (CA-04-64-SGW)

Submitted: January 28, 2005 Decided: February 25, 2005

Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas L. Switzer, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Thomas L. Switzer appeals the district court’s orders

denying his application to proceed in forma pauperis, denying his

request for reconsideration, and dismissing without prejudice his

civil action as frivolous. Because the dismissal was without

prejudice, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because

the order is not a final, appealable order. See Domino Sugar

Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th

Cir. 1993). We also deny Switzer’s motion to proceed in forma

pauperis on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 43 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 43

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
 for a ceremony honoring the life and legacy of Nelson Mandela on the 
             occasion of the 95th anniversary of his birth.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 8, 2013

  Ms. Waters submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
 for a ceremony honoring the life and legacy of Nelson Mandela on the 
             occasion of the 95th anniversary of his birth.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR CEREMONY HONORING NELSON 
              MANDELA.

    Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center is authorized to be 
used on July 18, 2013, for a ceremony honoring the life and legacy of 
Nelson Mandela on the occasion of the 95th anniversary of his birth. 
Physical preparations for the ceremony shall be carried out in 
accordance with such conditions as the Architect of the Capitol may 
prescribe.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF 3/31/96 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             397
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,434
<ALLOWANCES>                                       162
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,386
<PP&E>                                           5,373
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,043
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,544
<BONDS>                                            992
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            42
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,479
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,043
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,519
<CGS>                                            7,990
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,990
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,062
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 176
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    291
<INCOME-TAX>                                       137
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                154
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       154
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 83 

Designating March 2, 2011, as ‘‘Read Across America Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 1, 2011 

Mr. REED (for himself and Ms. COLLINS) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating March 2, 2011, as ‘‘Read Across America Day’’. 

Whereas reading is a basic requirement for quality education 

and professional success, and is a source of pleasure 

throughout life; 

Whereas the people of the United States must be able to read 

if the United States is to remain competitive in the global 

economy; 

Whereas Congress has placed great emphasis on reading 

intervention and providing additional resources for reading assistance, including through the programs authorized in the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (20 

U.S.C. 6301 et seq.) and through annual appropriations 

for library and literacy programs; and 

Whereas more than 50 national organizations concerned 

about reading and education have joined with the NaVerDate Mar 15 2010 22:43 Mar 01, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR83.ATS SR83

jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 83 ATS 

tional Education Association to designate March 2, the 

anniversary of the birth of Theodor Geisel, also known as 

Dr. Seuss, as a day to celebrate reading: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates March 2, 2011, as ‘‘Read Across 

3 America Day’’; 

4 (2) honors Theodor Geisel, also known as Dr. 

5 Seuss, for his success in encouraging children to dis6 cover the joy of reading; 

7 (3) honors the 14th anniversary of ‘‘Read 

8 Across America Day’’; 

9 (4) encourages parents to read with their chil10 dren for at least 30 minutes on ‘‘Read Across Amer11 ica Day’’ in honor of the commitment of the Senate 

12 to building a nation of readers; and 

13 (5) encourages the people of the United States 

14 to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and 

15 activities. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
YUNG-KAI LU, Petitioner, v. UNIVERSITY OF UTAH, et al.

No. 19-950.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Exhibit 4 to the Complaint.

Claim 1 Evidences

1.A method

comprising:

Defendant provides symbology (i.e., a QR code), associated with advertisements and at least one website of Macy’s.

Source: Image of Defendant provided QR Code.

Infringement Claim Chart for U.S. Pat. No. US8424752B2 Vs Macy’s (“Defendant”)

Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-4 Filed 04/29/24 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 314
Source: Screenshots taken from portable electronic device, hereinafter a “Smartphone”.

QR Code Scan Decode Action

Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-4 Filed 04/29/24 Page 2 of 8 PageID #: 315
a) capturing

a digital

image using

a digital

image

capturing

device that

is part of a

portable

electronic

device;

Defendant uses, or induces the use of,a camera (digital image capturing device) on a Smartphone that captures the 

digital image.

Source: Screenshot taken from Smartphone.

Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-4 Filed 04/29/24 Page 3 of 8 PageID #: 316
b) detecting

Symbology

associated

with an

object within

the digital

image using

a portable

electronic

device;

Defendant uses, or induces the use of, a Smartphone to detect symbology (i.e., QR code) associated with the 

website of Macy’s.

Source: Screenshot taken from Smartphone.

Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-4 Filed 04/29/24 Page 4 of 8 PageID #: 317
c) decoding

the

symbology

to obtain a

decode

string using

one or more

visual

detection

applications

residing on

the portable

electronic

device;

Defendant decodes, or induces the decoding of, the QR code pattern to obtain a decode string (i.e., hyperlink) using 

the camera application residing in the Smartphone. 

Source: Screenshot taken from Smartphone.

Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-4 Filed 04/29/24 Page 5 of 8 PageID #: 318
d) sending

the decode

string to a

remote

server for

processing;

Defendant sends, or induces the sending of, the decoded string to a remote server for processing. Specifically, the 

Smartphone sends the information associated with the QR code to the Macy’s Server.

Source: Screenshot taken from Smartphone.

Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-4 Filed 04/29/24 Page 6 of 8 PageID #: 319
e) receiving

information

about the

object from

the remote

server

wherein the

information

is based on

the decode

string of the

object;

After the Defendant, or one induced by the Defendant, clicks on the hyperlink that is obtained by scanning the QR 

code associated with the Macy’s website, the Smartphone receives the information and navigates directly to the 

website of Macy’s.

Source: Screenshot taken from Smartphone.

Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-4 Filed 04/29/24 Page 7 of 8 PageID #: 320
f) displaying

the

information

on a display

device

associated

with the

portable

electronic

device.

Defendant sends, or induces the sending of, the decoded string to a remote server (in this case, a Macy’s server) for 

processing.The information is received and it is displayed on the display associated with the Smartphone as shown 

below.

Source: Screenshot taken from Smartphone.

Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-4 Filed 04/29/24 Page 8 of 8 PageID #: 321