alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Christopher Omar HINTON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7248

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 12 

 

Case 2:23-cv-00576-JRG-RSP Document 26-21 Filed 01/29/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1186
1/5/24, 11:56 PM Lava Records

www.lavarecords.com/contact/ 1/2

1755 Broadway

New York, NY 10019

SEND

Map

data

©2024

Google

Report a map error (https://www.google.com/maps/@40.765836,-73.982323,15z/data=!10m1!1e1!12b1?source=apiv3&rapsrc=apiv3)

(https://maps.google.com/maps?ll=40.765836,-73.982323&z=15&t=m&hl=en-US&gl=US&mapclient=apiv3)

Email

Subject

Name

State

Zip

Enter message

© LAVA RECORDS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DESIGNED BY MATTE

Case 2:23-cv-00576-JRG-RSP Document 26-21 Filed 01/29/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 1187
1/5/24, 11:56 PM Lava Records

www.lavarecords.com/contact/ 2/2

© LAVA RECORDS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DESIGNED BY MATTE

Case 2:23-cv-00576-JRG-RSP Document 26-21 Filed 01/29/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 1188
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed July 3, 2024.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D23-905

Lower Tribunal No. F22-21134

Russell McCray,

Appellant, 

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An appeal conducted pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967), from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, William Altfield, Judge.

Russell McCray, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and David Llanes, Assistant Attorney 

General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 120 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 120

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR CEREMONY TO PRESENT 
              CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL TO WORLD WAR II MEMBERS OF CIVIL 
              AIR PATROL.

    Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center is authorized to be 
used on December 10, 2014, for a

              

 ceremony to present the Congressional Gold Medal to the World War II 
members of the Civil Air Patrol collectively, in recognition of the 
military service and exemplary record of the Civil Air Patrol during 
World War II. Physical preparations for the conduct of the ceremony 
shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as the 
Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 3, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 120

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
for a ceremony to present the Congressional Gold Medal to the World War 
                  II members of the Civil Air Patrol.
```
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

I, Dana D. Messina, certifythat:

 

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Steinway Musical Instruments, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

a) Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

c) Evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

d) Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing equivalent functions):

 

a) All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: August  11, 2003 |
|------------------------|
|                   |
|                   | /s/ Dana D.  Messina |   |
|                   | Dana D.  Messina |
|                   | Director,  President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

URGO HOTELS LP, a Maryland limited partnership, by and through its

general partners, URGO LODGING MANAGEMENT, LLC, DONALD J. URGO, DONALD J. URGO, JR., KEVIN M. URGO, COLLIN D. URGO and UH

- SI, LLC, a Florida limited liability company

, Appellant s ,

v.

THE RESORT AT SINGER ISLAND, HOTEL CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida corporation

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 1330

[ April 3, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; David E. French , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2015

- CA

014327

- XXXX

- MB

.

Jack J. A i ello, Heather C. Costanzo, Devin S. Radkay, and Gregor J. Schwinghammer of Gunster, Yoakley & Stewart, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellants.

Alan B. R ose and Daniel A. Thomas of Mrachek, Fitzgerald, Rose, Konopka, Thomas & Weiss, P.A., West Palm Beach, and Daniel S. Rosenbaum of Rosenbaum PLLC, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

. See Garden Suburbs Golf & Country Club, Inc. v. Pruitt , 24 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 1946).

W ARNER , G ROSS and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION 

AUTHOR J. MANNING, JR., 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

MICROSOFT, INC., et al., 

 Defendants. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Case No. 6:24-cv-21-JDK-JDL 

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Author J. Manning, Jr., proceeding pro se, filed this case on January 

22, 2024. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love for 

findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for disposition. 

On February 5, 2024, Judge Love issued a Report recommending that the 

Court dismiss this case with prejudice for failure to state a claim and as frivolous. 

Docket No. 10. A copy of this Report was sent to Plaintiff. However, no 

objections have been received. 

This Court reviews the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge de

novo only if a party objects within fourteen days of service of the Report and 

Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In conducting a de novo review, the Court 

examines the entire record and makes an independent assessment under the law. 

Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), 

Case 6:24-cv-00021-JDK-JDL Document 11 Filed 03/14/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 43
2 

superseded on other grounds by statute, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (extending the time to 

file objections from ten to fourteen days). 

Here, Plaintiff did not object in the prescribed period. The Court therefore 

reviews the Magistrate Judge’s findings for clear error or abuse of discretion and 

reviews the legal conclusions to determine whether they are contrary to law. See 

United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 

918 (1989) (holding that, if no objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Report are filed, the 

standard of review is “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law”). 

Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and the record in this case, 

the Court finds no clear error or abuse of discretion and no conclusions contrary to 

law. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the 

United States Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 10) as the findings of this Court. It is 

therefore ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to 

state a claim and as frivolous. 

Signed this

Mar 14, 2024

Case 6:24-cv-00021-JDK-JDL Document 11 Filed 03/14/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 44
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TEXARKANA DIVISION

OPTIMORPHIX, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

BROADCOM INC.,

 Defendant.

Civil Action No. 5:23-cv-134

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

NOTICE OF LEAD ATTORNEY

 COMES NOW, OptiMorphix, Inc. (“OptiMorphix” or “Plaintiff”) and hereby notifies 

the Court and all parties of record that Daniel P. Hipskind, Berger & Hipskind LLP, 9538 

Brighton Way, Suite 320, Beverly Hills, CA 90210, is designated as lead counsel for Plaintiff in 

the above-captioned case.

Case 5:23-cv-00134-RWS-JBB Document 5 Filed 11/20/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 175
Page 2 of 2

Dated: November 20, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Daniel P. Hipskind____________________

Dorian S. Berger (CA SB No. 264424)

Daniel P. Hipskind (CA SB No. 266763)

Erin E. McCracken (CA SB No. 244523)

BERGER & HIPSKIND LLP

9538 Brighton Way, Ste. 320

Beverly Hills, CA 90210

Telephone: 323-886-3430

Facsimile: 323-978-5508

E-mail: dsb@bergerhipskind.com

E-mail: dph@bergerhipskind.com

E-mail: eem@bergerhipskind.com

Elizabeth L. DeRieux

State Bar No. 05770585

Capshaw DeRieux, LLP

114 E. Commerce Ave.

Gladewater, TX 75647

Telephone: 903-845-5770

E-mail: ederieux@capshawlaw.com

Attorneys for OptiMorphix, Inc.

Case 5:23-cv-00134-RWS-JBB Document 5 Filed 11/20/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 176
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                     $11,545,984
<SECURITIES>                                23,296,840
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,036,017
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,781,893
<PP&E>                                     967,301,005
<DEPRECIATION>                           (172,206,379)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             864,755,360
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 56,250,000
<COMMON>                                     2,271,671
<OTHER-SE>                                 186,734,081
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               864,755,360
<SALES>                                    107,594,381
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           116,634,832
<CGS>                                       41,790,131
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,314,095
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          27,445,198
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             15,663,116
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         15,663,116
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            (1,808,742)
<CHANGES>                                    4,319,162
<NET-INCOME>                                18,173,536
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .63



</TABLE>
Tyrone HARRIS, Sr., Petitioner, v. ARKANSAS.

No. 19-7883.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 02/26/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       42,950
COMMITMENTS
   5,193    2,743    2,575   23,189   25,910   30,957   31,228   11,994   11,723

CHANGES FROM 02/19/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -5,636)
     -44      420   -1,274   -3,518   -3,971   -4,837   -4,825     -800     -811

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    12.1      6.4      6.0     54.0     60.3     72.1     72.7     27.9     27.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       58)
       9        7        8       36       29       49       43
```

----

Updated March 1, 2013
Tom CLOWERS, Petitioner, v. Kelly CRADDUCK, et al.

No. 19M113.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time under Rule 14.5 denied.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

12/20/2023

Eastern District of Texas

PUSH DATA LLC,

4:23-cv-1122

Lane Bryant Inc.

Lane Bryant Inc.

c/o its Registered Agent

Secretary of State Townsend Bldg, Suite 4

Dover, DE 19901

Trevor Beaty

trevor@beatylegal.com

514 North Elm Street

Sherman, Texas 75090

Telephone: (903) 287-5121

Facsimile: (903) 287-5145

Case 4:23-cv-01122-ALM Document 4 Filed 12/20/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 313
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

4:23-cv-1122

0.00

Case 4:23-cv-01122-ALM Document 4 Filed 12/20/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 314
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Section 1350 Certifications**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Strategic Diagnostics Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, based on such officer’s knowledge, that: 

|   | (i) | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2006 (the ”Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

| Date: November 13, 2006 |   |   | /s/ Anthony J. Simonetta                                                                              |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                    |   |   |  

 

 

Anthony J. Simonetta

 

 

 

Chief Financial Officer

  |
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF A P P E A LS E LE V E N T H C IR C U IT DE C 7 , 2006 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE EL EV EN TH CIRC UI T

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ N o. 05- 1684 8

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ D. C. Docket N o. 03-02733 CV-B- S, LAURA CAIN, Pl ai nti ff -Appe llant,
ve rs us THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF T HE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA, VAXIN, D ef en dants -Appe lle es .

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ Appeal f rom the United State s District Court f o r th e N o rt h e rn D i s t r i c to f

A l ab a ma

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ (D ec em be r 7, 200 6) Before AN DE RSO N and BARKET T, Circuit Judges, and GO LD BE RG, * Judg e.

_______________ *Honora ble Richard W. Goldber g , J udg e, United States Court of International Trade , sitti ngby desig nation.Any claim with respe ct to Dr. Reddy is tim e-ba

rre d. 1 In light of our

dispositi on, we ne ed not addr ess plaintiff’s a rgument about the joint 2 e mpl oye r t

he or y . App e lle e Vaxin’ s mo tio n f or do ub le c os ts a

nd atto rn e y fe e s o n a pp e a l is Denied. 2 PE R CU RIA M: Af ter oral argum ent and caref ul consid eration, w e conclude that the district court is due to be affirm ed. For the re asons di scussed at oral argum ent, the alleged host ile e nvi ro nm en t di d no t r ise to the ne ce ssary le ve l of se ve ri ty or pe rv as ive ne ss, 1
an d e ve n if

it did , pla int if

f cannot sur m ount the F ar ag he r v. Ci ty

of Bo ca Raton , 118 S. Ct
. 227 5 ( 1998 ), de fe nse . W ithr es pe ct to the pr om oti on o f D r. S ie ge l, pla int if f w as not qua lif ie d. Mo re ove r, no r ea sona ble j ur y c oul d f ind pr et ex t i n li ght of the le git im at e busi ne ss r ea son. W ithr es pe ct to pla int if

f’ s r et al ia tio n c la im , no
re as ona ble j ur y c oul d f ind r et al ia tio n inli ght

of the f ac t tha t pl ai nti ff

w as not qualified for the positio n to which Dr . S iegel wa s prom oted. W e note that appellant’ s initial brief fails to preserve any challenge to any

later denial of a pr om oti on, e ith er

a s asub stanti ve c ha lle nge or a s an a lle ge d a ct iontake n in ret al ia ti on forpro te ct edco nd uc t. A cc or din gly , the j udgm en t of the dis tr ic t c ourt i s AFFIR MED. 2
Exhibit 10.5


 


 





HEYER


MEDICAL AG


Unit 2006, Tower D, Yuanyang International
Center


62 DongSiHuan Middle Road, Chaoyang District


Beijing 100025


T: 010-85185165


Email: sales@heyer.cn


www.heyermedical.de


 


 


 


 


Authorization Agreement


 


HEYER Medical, AG hereby appoints DEHAIER
Medical Technology Co., Ltd as the Agent for the full distribution, after-sales service and related matters of the
company’s anesthesia machine in the areas of Sichuan, Chongqing, Yunnan, Guizhou, Shaanxi, Gansu, Qinghai, Ningxia
Hui Autonomous Region, Beijing, Henan, Jiangxi, Hebei, Jiling, and the Yiyang region of Hunan.


 


So hereby is authorized.


 


This authorization is valid from January 1, 2011 to December
31, 2012.


 


 


 


HEYER Medical, Ag


 


/s/ Gao, Wei


 


Gao, Wei


 


Sales and Marketing Manager


 


 


 


/s/ Mi, Fu


 


Mi, Fu


 


General Manager


 


December 31, 2010