alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 06/11/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      728,047
COMMITMENTS
  94,702   35,811  194,788  420,775  476,431  710,266  707,030   17,781   21,017

CHANGES FROM 06/04/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     22,349)
   2,327   -4,290   12,422    8,463   16,501   23,213   24,633     -863   -2,284

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    13.0      4.9     26.8     57.8     65.4     97.6     97.1      2.4      2.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      158)
      41       45       62       66       66      142      141
```

----

Updated June 14, 2013
Mirella Landi ADELMAN, Petitioner v. Lawrence ROOT, et al.

No. 18-9009

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

ZACHERIAH SHAD ALEXANDER 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NO. 4:23-CR-00230(2) 

ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE’S REPORT AND FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY

The Court referred this matter to the United States Magistrate Judge for 

administration of a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The Magistrate 

Judge conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued Findings

of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the 

Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on Count One of the First 

Superseding Indictment. 

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings. 

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty 

Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court also accepts Defendant’s plea but 

defers acceptance of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Zacheriah 

Shad Alexander GUILTY of Count One of the First Superseding Indictment, charging a 

violation of Title 21 U.S.C. § 846 - Conspiracy to Possess with Intent to Distribute 

Methamphetamine (actual). 

Case 4:23-cr-00230-ALM-BD Document 83 Filed 10/19/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 167
IT IS SO ORDERED.

2

Case 4:23-cr-00230-ALM-BD Document 83 Filed 10/19/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 168
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-13-00164-CR

Jerry VILLARREAL,

Appellant

v.

The State of 

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR5560

Honorable Dick Alcala, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED May 15, 2013.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           424,252
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      22,093
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 585,442
<CASH>                                          16,567
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             283,292
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          95,465
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,282,569
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                483,942
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            261,988
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                268,314
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              190
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     164,232
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,282,569
<PREMIUMS>                                     124,157
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              8,410
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                  (1)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  16,335
<BENEFITS>                                      73,204
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     39,246
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            16,067
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,771
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,616
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,793
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,793
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .47
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 504,911
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                483,942
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/09/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      140,291
COMMITMENTS
  32,608   42,319   10,595   81,177   63,837  124,380  116,751   15,911   23,540

CHANGES FROM 07/02/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,611)
    -732      -15     -709    5,457    3,120    4,016    2,396     -405    1,215

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    23.2     30.2      7.6     57.9     45.5     88.7     83.2     11.3     16.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      178)
      41       51       35       63       57      124      128
```

----

Updated July 13, 2013
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

ANDREW SUTTON BLITZ,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 17

- 50394

D.C. No. 2:17

- cr

- 00112

- PA

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 15, 2019 **

Before: TROTT, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Andrew Sutton Blitz appeals from the dis trict court’s judgment and

challenges the 70

- month sentence imposed following his guilty

- plea conviction for

conspiracy

, possess ion of unauthorized devices , aggravated identity theft, and

aiding and abetting , in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1029, 1028A, and 2. We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JAN 17 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 50394

have jurisdiction u nder 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm

.

Blitz contends that the district court erred by imposing a two

- level

sentencing enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 3C1.2 for reckless endangerment during

flight from law enforcement. Blitz con cedes that the high

- speed chase constituted

reckless endangerment, but argues that the district court clearly erred by finding he

was the drive r of the vehicle involved in the chase . The district court’s finding that

Blitz was the driver was not clearly e rroneous because it was supported by a law

enforcement officer’s identification of Blitz as the man he saw fleeing the scene of

the chase

, the fact that Blitz had access to the vehicle, and Blitz’s co

- conspirator’s

statement

. See United States v. Gasca

- Ru iz , 852 F.3d 1167, 1170 (9th Cir. 2017)

(en banc) (district court’s factual findings at sentencing are reviewed for clear

error); United States v. Spangle , 626 F.3d 488, 497 (9th Cir. 2010) (district court’s

factual findings are clearly erroneous only if they are “illogical, implausible, or

without support in the record”). Contrary to Blitz’s argument, the district court did

not err by relying on the police officer’s identification because other evidence

corroborated it. See United States v. Ingham , 486 F.3d 1068, 1076 (9 th Cir. 2007)

(district court may rely on hearsay at sentencing as long as it is supported by “some

minimal indicia of reliability” (internal quotations omitted)).

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5       
<LEGEND>                                
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999 
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999 
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999 
<CASH>                                      11,700,000 
<SECURITIES>                                16,799,000 
<RECEIVABLES>                               38,400,000 
<ALLOWANCES>                                (2,755,000) 
<INVENTORY>                                 61,614,000 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           127,185,000 
<PP&E>                                      32,290,000 
<DEPRECIATION>                              (8,123,000) 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             152,265,000 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       71,169,000 
<BONDS>                                              0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                          0 
<COMMON>                                        15,000 
<OTHER-SE>                                  81,081,000 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               152,265,000 
<SALES>                                     67,398,000 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            77,924,000 
<CGS>                                       52,826,000 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               69,476,000 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             154,000 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,960,000 
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,016,000 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,944,000 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,944,000 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.46 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.43 
         

</TABLE>
Gary Ray BOWLES, petitioner, v. Ron DeSANTIS, Governor of Florida, et al.

No. 19-5651 (19A203).

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 22, 2019.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice THOMAS and by him referred to the Court denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA '

'

versus ' NO. 1:23-CR-128-MAC

'

JAJUAN LEE BONDS '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Stetson conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued her Findings of Fact and Recommendation 

on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. Judge Stetson recommended that 

the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. She further recommended that the court adjudge 

the Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to Judge Stetson’s findings. The court ORDERS that the 

Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge are 

ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea.

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Jajuan Lee Bonds, is 

adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. '

922(o)(1) and ' 924(a)(2) – Possession of a Machinegun.

.

 ________________________________________

 MARCIA A. CRONE

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 7th day of September, 2004. SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 1st day of August, 2024.

Case 1:23-cr-00128-MAC-CLS Document 28 Filed 08/01/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 79
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

ELIOTT WILLIAMS §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23cv363

S. PEREZ, ET AL. §

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiff Elliot Williams, an inmate confined at the Lewis Unit of the Texas Department of

Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several defendants.

Discussion

When, as in this case, jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1391 provides that venue is proper only in the judicial district where the defendants reside or in

which the claim arose. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), for the convenience of parties and witnesses and

in the interests of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division

where it could have been brought.

The actions allegedly taken by the defendants took place at the Lewis Unit, which is located

in the Lufkin Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. 

Plaintiff’s claims therefore arose in the Lufkin Division. The defendants, who are employed at the

Lewis Unit, appears to reside in the Lufkin Division. However, this case was filed in the Beaumont

Division. 

Case 9:23-cv-00172-MAC-ZJH Document 2 Filed 10/02/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 26
The court has considered the circumstances and determined that the interest of justice would

be served if the complaint were transferred to the division in which the claims arose. It is

accordingly

ORDERED that this civil rights action is TRANSFERRED to the Lufkin Division of the

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.

2

.

___________________________________

Christine L Stetson

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SIGNED this the 2nd day of October, 2023.

Case 9:23-cv-00172-MAC-ZJH Document 2 Filed 10/02/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 27
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

SOCIAL POSITIONING INPUT SYSTEMS,

LLC

Plaintiff,

v.

VALVE CORPORATION, 

GEARBOX SOFTWARE, LLC

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-422-JRG-RSP

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

DEFENDANT VALVE CORPORATION’S CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, Plaintiff Valve Corporation (“Valve”) 

hereby states that it has no parent corporation, no publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of 

Valve stock, and there is no parent, shareholder, member, or partner to identify as required by 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1.

Case 2:23-cv-00422-JRG-RSP Document 12 Filed 12/13/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 125
2

Dated: December 13, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Michael E. Jones

Michael E. Jones (SBN: 10929400)

Shaun W. Hassett (SBN: 24074372)

Potter Minton

102 North College, Ste. 900

Tyler, Texas 75702

Telephone: 903-597-8311

mikejones@potterminton.com

shaunhassett@potterminton.com

Kathleen R. Geyer

Christopher P. Damitio 

Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton

1420 Fifth Avenue Suite 3700 

Seattle, WA 98101 

Telephone: (206) 467-9600 

Facsimile: (206) 623-6793 

KGeyer@kilpatricktownsend.com 

CDamitio@kilpatricktownsend.com 

Attorneys for Defendant

Valve Corp.

Case 2:23-cv-00422-JRG-RSP Document 12 Filed 12/13/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 126
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DONNIE RAY PEOPLES

,

Appellant

,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 9

- 00 30 6

- C R

Appeal from

143 rd D istrict C ourt

of Ward C ounty, Texas

(TC# 19

- 10

- 252 30

- CVW )

O R D E R

The record before us does not contain the trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right

of appeal. T EX .R.A PP .P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). The trial court is ordered to prepare and file with the trial

court clerk within thirty days from the date of this order a certification of the defendant’s right of

appeal as required by T EX .R.A PP .P. 25.2(a)(2) and 25.2 (d). The trial court clerk shall prepare a

supplemental clerk’s record containing the certification and file it with this Court no later than

March 13, 2020

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 28 th d ay of J anuary , 20 20

.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
Arika MATELYAN, petitioner, v. ATLANTIC RECORDS WMG, et al.

No. 18-5829.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
-1- 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC, 

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00382 

v. (Lead Case) 

 

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/BA VERIZON 

WIRELESS., 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

Defendants, 

 

ERICSSON INC., 

Intervenor, 

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC, 

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00380 

v. (Member Case) 

 

AT&T MOBILITY LLC, AT&T SERVICES, 

INC., AND AT&T CORP., 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

Defendants, 

 

ERICSSON INC., 

Intervenor, 

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC, 

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00381 

(Member Case) 

v. 

 

T-MOBILE USA, INC. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

Defendants. 

 

ERICSSON INC., 

Intervenor, 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF DAVID S. FRIST

Notice is hereby given that the undersigned attorney, David S. Frist, enters his 

appearance in the above-referenced proceedings for Defendant/Intervenor Ericsson Inc. 

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 79 Filed 01/11/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 675
-2- 

(“Ericsson” or “Defendant/Intervenor”). Ericsson respectfully requests that the court take note of 

this Notice of Appearance and makes David S. Frist its lead counsel of record in this lawsuit. 

Copies of all communications and other documents filed in the above-referenced proceedings 

that are not filed via ECF should be emailed or faxed to David S. Frist at the address set forth 

below. 

Dated: January 11, 2024 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ David S. Frist 

David S. Frist (GA Bar No. 205611) 

 david.frist@alston.com 

ALSTON & BIRD LLP 

1201 West Peachtree Street 

Suite 4900 

Atlanta, GA 30309 

Telephone: (404)881-7000 

Facsimile: (404)881-7777 

Counsel for Defendant/Intervenor Ericsson, Inc. 

 

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 79 Filed 01/11/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 676
-3- 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that on this 11th day of January, 2024, I electronically filed the foregoing with the 

Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will automatically send notification of such filing upon 

Counsel of Record. 

/s/ David S. Frist 

David S. Frist (GA Bar No. 205611) 

 david.frist@alston.com 

ALSTON & BIRD LLP 

1201 West Peachtree Street 

Suite 4900 

Atlanta, GA 30309 

Telephone: (404)881-7000 

Facsimile: (404)881-7777 

Counsel for Defendant/Intervenor Ericsson, Inc.

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 79 Filed 01/11/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 677
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/05/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      164,037
COMMITMENTS
  38,861   38,505   22,566   86,510   79,240  147,937  140,311   16,100   23,726

CHANGES FROM 02/26/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -8,768)
     872    2,428      952   -9,639  -11,264   -7,815   -7,884     -953     -884

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    23.7     23.5     13.8     52.7     48.3     90.2     85.5      9.8     14.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      195)
      49       51       46       61       70      136      146
```

----

Updated March 8, 2013
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/02/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      697,493
COMMITMENTS
  96,867   31,794  201,299  379,406  446,692  677,571  679,785   19,922   17,708

CHANGES FROM 03/26/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     29,328)
   1,535     -371    2,964   24,670   28,185   29,170   30,778      158   -1,450

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    13.9      4.6     28.9     54.4     64.0     97.1     97.5      2.9      2.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      157)
      45       40       68       61       66      140      142
```

----

Updated April 5, 2013
SABAN RENT-A-CAR LLC, et al., Petitioners, v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, et al.

No. 19-136

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arizona denied.