alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2328 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2328

  To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize the 
                          Clean Lakes Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 23, 1999

 Mr. Sweeney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize the 
                          Clean Lakes Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLEAN LAKES PROGRAM.

    (a) Authorization of Appropriations for Grants to States.--Section 
314(c)(2) is amended by striking ``$50,000,000'' the first place it 
appears and all that follows through ``1990'' and inserting 
``$100,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2000 through 2005''.
    (b) Demonstration Program.--Section 314(d)(4) is amended by 
striking ``1986'' in each of subparagraphs (A) and (B)(i) and inserting 
``1999''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, NOTES, THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           5,583
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,744
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,755
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,870
<PP&E>                                           7,784
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,324
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  78,386
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,591
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           148
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,231)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    78,386
<SALES>                                        158,014
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               158,014
<CGS>                                          147,188
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  159,043
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,319
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,921)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        (2)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,919)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,919)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.13)


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION

CASE NO. 2:24-cv-00052-JRG-RSP

(Lead Case)

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant Zaxby’s Opposed Motion for Miscellaneous Relief. (Dkt. 

No. 31.) Therein Zaxby’s contends that Plaintiff Analytical Technologies never responded 

to its motion to dismiss and that while Plaintiff amended the Complaint, the amendment does 

not meaningfully address Defendant's arguments and, in any case, was filed well after the

deadline. 

The Court admonishes the Plaintiff and its counsel for its failure to timely respond to 

Zaxby’s motion and ORDERS Plaintiff to respond to Zaxby’s Motion to dismiss within 10

days of this order. Defendant Zaxby’s is permitted a reply as under the Local Rules. The 

Court expects Plaintiff’s response to address the failure to timely respond to Zaxby’s motion 

and, if it believes its amended complaint is a response, how the newly added material responds 

to Zaxby’s arguments. 

ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v. 

JACK IN THE BOX INC.

Defendant

Case 2:24-cv-00052-JRG-RSP Document 32 Filed 09/13/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 191
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Credit Union Administration

# TIME AND DATE: 

10:00 a.m., Thursday, May 26, 2022.

# PLACE: 

                        Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic, the meeting will be open to the public via live webcast only. Visit the agency's homepage (                        *www.ncua.gov*) and access the provided webcast link.                    

# STATUS: 

This meeting will be open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

 1. Board Briefing, Share Insurance Fund Quarterly Report.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks, Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2022-11217 Filed 5-20-22; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
a50264330ex10-2.htm


Exhibit 10.2







AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT







This Amendment to the Employment Agreement (“Amendment”) is made and entered into as of May 7, 2012 (the “Effective Date”) by and between Coach, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”) and Reed Krakoff (the “Executive”) for the purpose of amending the Employment Agreement by and between the Company and the Executive dated as of June 1, 2003 (the “2003 Employment Agreement”), as subsequently amended by Letter Agreements between the Company and the Executive dated August 22, 2005 (the “2005 Letter Agreement”) and March 11, 2008 (the “2008 Letter Agreement” and, collectively with the 2003 Employment Agreement and the 2005 Letter Agreement, the “Employment Agreement”).







WHEREAS, upon the terms and conditions set forth herein, the parties hereto desire to modify certain terms of the Employment Agreement as hereinafter provided;







WHEREAS, Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, may impose an excise tax (the “Parachute Tax”) on certain payments to an executive following a change-in-control; and







WHEREAS, Section 8 of the Employment Agreement provides for a “Gross-up Payment” (as such term is defined in the Employment Agreement and commonly referred to as a “280G Gross-Up”) to the Executive to offset any Parachute Tax imposed following the Executive’s receipt of payments or benefits pursuant to the Employment Agreement; and







WHEREAS, the Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, with the support of the Company’s management, has approved the elimination of the 280G Gross-Up benefit for all Company executives that currently receive such benefit;







NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants set forth below, the Company and the Executive hereby agree as follows:







1.           Amendment to Section 8. Section 8 of the Employment Agreement entitled “Parachute Payments” is hereby deleted in its entirety and reserved for future use.


 


2.           Except as otherwise specifically provided in this Amendment, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first above written.


 


 




  





  











  






 


 




	  	COMPANY
	  	 	  	 
	  	By: 	
/s/ Sarah Dunn

	 
	  	Its:	
Executive Vice President, Human Resources

	 
	  	 	  	 
	  	EXECUTIVE
	  	 	  	 
	  	 	
/s/ Reed Krakoff

	 
	  	 	
Reed Krakoff
Exhibit 10.1

 

Summary of 2012 Terms of Employment for Named Executive Officers

 

Salary

 

	
Officer 
    	
 
    	
Salary
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
F. Michael Ball, Chief Executive Officer
    	
 
    	
$
    	
1,000,000
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Sumant Ramachandra, Senior Vice President, R&D,   Medical and Regulatory Affairs, and Chief Scientific Officer
    	
 
    	
520,000
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Brian J. Smith, Senior Vice President and General   Counsel
    	
 
    	
475,000
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Thomas E. Werner, Senior Vice President, Finance   and Chief Financial Officer
    	
 
    	
458,000
    	
 
    
					


 

The salary for each officer took effect on April 2, 2012.  The 2011 salaries were included in Hospira’s 2012 Proxy Statement, filed on March 23, 2012.

 

Annual Cash Incentive

 

Each officer is a participant in the Hospira, Inc. 2004 Performance Incentive Plan, as amended, which is filed as Exhibit 10.4 for the Hospira, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.  The plan provides for a base award equal to 2.0% of Hospira’s earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization for the chief executive officer, 1.5% for a chief operating officer, and 1.0% for the other named executive officers.  The compensation committee of Hospira’s board of directors has discretion to reduce, but not increase, the award from the base award.  The committee may consider Hospira’s adjusted net income, cash flows or corporate well-being as factors in exercising such discretion and determining actual awards payable under such plan.

 

Equity

 

Each officer is eligible to receive option and performance share awards under the Hospira 2004 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, as amended which is filed as Exhibit 10.2 for the Hospira, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.   Awards are made at the discretion of the compensation committee of Hospira’s board of directors.

 

Change in Control and Severance Pay

 

Each officer is a party to a change-in-control agreement in the form filed with the SEC and shown as an exhibit in the exhibit list to the Hospira, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

 

All of the named executive officers are covered by the Hospira Corporate Officer Severance Plan, which provides severance pay and benefits to corporate officers and is filed as Exhibit 10.10 for the Hospira, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

 

Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan

 

Each officer is eligible to participate in the Hospira Non-Qualified Savings and Investment Plan, a non-qualified deferred compensation plan, which is filed as Exhibit 10.9 for the Hospira, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.  A description of the above-described items is included in Hospira’s proxy statement for the 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

SEBASTIAN ANGEL TRUJILLO (2)

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NUMBER 4:23-CR-00231

ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY

The Court referred this matter to the United States Magistrate Judge for administration of 

a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a 

hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court accept 

Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on Count One of the Third Superseding 

Indictment.

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings.

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of 

the United States Magistrate Judge. The court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance 

of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report.

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Sebastian Angel 

Trujillo GUILTY of Count One of the Third Superseding Indictment, charging a violation of Title

21 U.S.C. § 846 - Conspiracy to Distribute and Possess with Intent to Distribute Fentanyl.

Case 4:23-cr-00231-ALM-AGD Document 328 Filed 04/29/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 737
Case 4:23-cr-00231-ALM-AGD Document 328 Filed 04/29/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 738
----

|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (i)    | the      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period      ended March 31, 2009 (the ”Report”) fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | (ii)   | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company.                                                                                                                                  |

|                         |                             |   |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------|--------|
| Date:      May 15,      2009 | /s/      Stanley A. Fronczkowski |   |
|                         | Stanley      A. Fronczkowski     |   |
|                         | Chief      Financial Officer     |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 1999
FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                                 1,000

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                        DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                         997
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               34,235
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 1,121
<INVENTORY>                                                 37,774
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            75,021
<PP&E>                                                      98,473
<DEPRECIATION>                                              61,141
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             136,711
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       55,983
<BONDS>                                                     88,751
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                    16,486
<OTHER-SE>                                                    (316)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               136,711
<SALES>                                                    436,787
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           436,787
<CGS>                                                      356,707
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              412,732
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          13,822
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             10,233
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 1,487
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          8,346
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  57
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                198
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 9,001
<EPS-BASIC>                                                  2.942
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                2.942
<FN>
LOSS PROVISION IS INCLUDED IN SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ON
THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</FN>



</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 99.7**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Eldorado Gold Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 40-F/A for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ed Miu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of        2002, that:

(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)        The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|   | March 31, 2010 | _ /s/ Ed Miu |
|--------|----------------|--------------|

|   | Ed Miu |
|--------|--------|

|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|-------------------------|

|   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Eldorado Gold Corporation and will be retained by Eldorado Gold Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

----
James Paul ARLOTTA, petitioner, v. NIAGARA FRONTIER TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, et al.

No. 18-8637.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 15, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

PHISON ELECTRONICS CORP.,

Appellant

v.

SILICON MOTION TECHNOLOGY CORP.,

Appellee

______________________ 

2015-1632

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2013-

00473.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

DAVID MICHAEL HOFFMAN, Fish & Richardson, P.C., 

Austin, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by 

DAVID M. BARKAN, Redwood City, CA; PROSHANTO 

MUKHERJI, Boston, MA.

JASON ALEXANDER ENGEL, K&L Gates LLP, Chicago, 

IL, argued for appellee. Also represented by BENJAMIN 

EDWARD WEED, DEVON C. BEANE; MELVIN CHAN, AKA 

Chan LLP, Santa Clara, CA.

______________________ 
 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, DYK and WALLACH,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 11, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

 Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 06/25/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       33,801
COMMITMENTS
   4,478    3,494      797   18,059   20,279   23,334   24,570   10,467    9,232

CHANGES FROM 06/18/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -2,574)
  -1,164     -448     -717      375     -481   -1,507   -1,646   -1,067     -928

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    13.2     10.3      2.4     53.4     60.0     69.0     72.7     31.0     27.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       53)
      11        7        7       31       22       44       35
```

----

Updated June 28, 2013