alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                 5
<LEGEND>
                       INTEGRATED MEDICAL RESOURCES, INC.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                           0000918591
<NAME>                                    INTEGRATED MEDICAL RESOURCES, INC.

<CURRENCY>                                U.S.DOLLARS

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1996

<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       6,739,697
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,487,366
<ALLOWANCES>                                   605,315
<INVENTORY>                                     99,788
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,982,155
<PP&E>                                       6,045,609
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,355,995
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,511,898
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,555,034
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,715
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,292,658
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,511,898
<SALES>                                     11,006,774
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,006,774
<CGS>                                        5,525,411
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,250,340
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             274,890
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (6,518,546)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (6,518,546)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (1.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (1.82)



</TABLE>
Exhibit  32 -  Certification  of Chief  Executive  Officer  and Chief  Financail
               Officer - Sarbanes-Oxley Section 906


Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. section 1350, the undersigned officers of Triad Guaranty
Inc. (the "Company"),  hereby certifies,  to such officer's knowledge,  that the
Company's Quartely Report on Form 10-Q for the Three months ended March 31, 2004
(the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as  applicable,  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934  and the  information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


 Date:  May 7, 2004


                                     By:  /s/ Darryl W. Thompson
                                          ----------------------
                                          Darryl W. Thompson
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer


                                     By:  /s/ Ron D. Kessinger
                                          --------------------
                                          Ron D. Kessinger
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer




The signed original of this written statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                            2444
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    40366
<ALLOWANCES>                                       331
<INVENTORY>                                      31347
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 77963
<PP&E>                                          113950
<DEPRECIATION>                                   22927
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  195532
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            37447
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            56
<OTHER-SE>                                       80766
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    195532
<SALES>                                         176933
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                176933
<CGS>                                           148205
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    15733
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   111
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  10484
<INCOME-TAX>                                      4310
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               6174
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      6174
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.11
        

</TABLE>
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 05/07/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       87,848
COMMITMENTS
  22,807    4,449    1,758   57,761   79,750   82,326   85,957    5,522    1,891

CHANGES FROM 04/30/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,973)
     425    1,658       10    2,436      704    2,871    2,372     -898     -399

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    26.0      5.1      2.0     65.8     90.8     93.7     97.8      6.3      2.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       82)
      12        5        1       42       36       54       42
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 05/07/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      201,042
COMMITMENTS
  65,719   32,511    1,209  117,985  161,950  184,913  195,670   16,129    5,372

CHANGES FROM 04/30/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        328)
   1,091   -4,851      -10   -2,198    6,190   -1,117    1,329    1,445   -1,001

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    32.7     16.2      0.6     58.7     80.6     92.0     97.3      8.0      2.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      141)
      35       13        7       70       51      109       67
```

----

Updated May 10, 2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                              60
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      596
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        572
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,348
<PP&E>                                             603
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,951
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,454
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,405
<OTHER-SE>                                    (33,507)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,951
<SALES>                                            988
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   988
<CGS>                                              650
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,098
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (13)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 481
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (578)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (578)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT C

Case 2:23-cv-00449-JRG Document 18-4 Filed 05/17/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 657
Job Title Position Appointed Name Appt.Grp. Status Reminder

Director 31/01/2010 Leung, Sze Leung Patrick

Director 31/03/2024 LO, Shing Cheuk

Director 23/10/2007 Wong, Wai Kwong

Director 06/09/2007 Wong, Wai Ming

Secretary 01/12/2022 Lam, Ngan Ling

Current Appointments

Case 2:23-cv-00449-JRG Document 18-4 Filed 05/17/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 658
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 20, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

136383 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver In re KYANDRE BROOKS, a Minor. Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan

________________ _______________ __________/ Robert P. Young, Jr. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Stephen J. Markman, Petitioner-Appellee, Justices v SC: 136383 COA: 283281 NEHEMIAH GREGORY, Washtenaw CC Respondent-Appellant. Family Division: 05-000123-NA

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to a ppeal the February 20, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1 ), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Cour t of Appeals. That court shall treat the responden t’s claim of appeal as having be en timely filed, reinstate the appeal, and decide the case on an ex pedited basis. The respondent’s pro bono counsel failed to file a claim of appeal within 14 da ys after entry of the or der terminating parental rights or a motion for rehearing in the trial c ourt within the 14-day time period set out in MCR 7.204(A)(1)(c), resulting in the Court of Appeals admi nistratively dismissing the respondent’s claim of appeal. Thus, the respondent was deprived of his appeal of right as
a result of ineffective assi stance of counsel. We do not retain jurisdiction.

C ORRIGAN , J., concurs and states as follows:

I join the order remanding th is matter to the Court of A ppeals. I write separately only to observe that the Atto rney Grievance Commission (AGC ) may wish to investigate the conduct of respondent’s appellate counsel. On February 20, 2008, the Court of Appeals dismissed respondent’s claim of appeal as untimel y. The Court of Appeals noted that respondent had “faile d to file the motion for reheari ng within 14 days of the November 13, 2007 order terminati ng parental rights as required by MCR 7.204(A)(1)(c).” Respondent’s co unsel argues that MCR 3.992( A) should control, but his motion was untimely under that rule as well. This missed deadline not only prejudices counsel’s client and the future of respondent’s child, but also Michigan’s compliance with federal audit requirements pursuant to th e current Child and Family Services Review. For these reasons, the di smissal by the Court of Appeals warrants AGC scrutiny.

d0617 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 20, 2008

Clerk
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

No. 6:23-cv-00553

Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

National Labor Relations Board et al.,

Defendants.

FINAL JUDGMENT

It is declared that enforcement against plaintiffs or their members of the rule issued by the National Labor Relations Board on 

October 27, 2023, entitled Standard for Determining Joint Employer Status, 88 Fed. Reg. 73,946, would be contrary to law as to 

the rule’s addition of a new 29 C.F.R. § 103.40 and arbitrary and 

capricious as to its removal of the existing 29 C.F.R. § 103.40 

(2020). In both respects, the rule is hereby vacated.

All other relief prayed for is denied without prejudice, except 

for attorneys’ fees and costs, which may be moved for after this 

final judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d).

The clerk of court is directed to enter this document on the 

docket as a final judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 58.

So ordered by the court on March 8, 2024.

J. Campbell Barker

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cv-00553-JCB Document 45 Filed 03/08/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 940
Gregory BARTKO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7274

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Eastern District of Texas

GIBCODE TECHNOLOGIES LLC

2:23-cv-581-JRG

THE KROGER CO.

THE KROGER CO. c/o 

Corporation Service Company d/b/a CSC-Lawyers Inco., 

211 E. 7th Street Suite 620, Austin, Texas 78701

Travis E. Lynch 

ROZIER HARDT MCDONOUGH PLLC 

659 Auburn Avenue NE, Unit 254 

Atlanta, Georgia 30312 

Telephone: (404) 564-1862 

Lynch@rhmtrial.com 12/8/2023

Case 2:23-cv-00581-JRG Document 4 Filed 12/08/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 40
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

2:23-cv-581-JRG 0.00 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00581-JRG Document 4 Filed 12/08/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 41
Michael Levon JACKSON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5260

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of *Rehaif* v. *United States* , 588 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 2191, 204 L.Ed.2d 594 (2019).
Brandon Wayne TAYLOR, Petitioner v. TEXAS.

No. 18-9591

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District denied.
Description of Material Compensatory Arrangements



 Exhibit 10.2 
 Description of Material Compensatory Arrangements Contained in Offer Letter 

Between Sigma-Aldrich Corporation and Jan A. Bertsch 
 Sigma-Aldrich Corporation (“Company”) entered into an offer letter containing compensatory arrangements with Jan A. Bertsch in connection with her election as Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company effective March 5, 2012. A description of the material compensatory arrangements contained in the offer letter is set forth below: 
  


	 	•	 	 Annual base salary of $450,000. 


  

	 	•	 	 Automobile allowance of $18,000 per year. 


  

	 	•	 	 Relocation assistance in accordance with Company’s standard executive relocation policy. 



 

	 	•	 	 One-time equity award consisting of: 


  

	 	•	 	 40,000 stock options that vest in three equal installments beginning on first anniversary of start date; and 



 

	 	•	 	 12,000 restricted stock units that vest in form of Company common stock in two equal installments on second and third anniversaries of start date.



  

	 	•	 	 Eligible for annual incentive awards with target award equal to 65% of annual base salary. Award payouts based on: 



 

	 	•	 	 Ms. Bertsch’s individual performance; and 


  

	 	•	 	 Company’s financial performance. 


  

	 	•	 	 Eligible for annual participation in Sigma-Aldrich Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan with target award (i) equal to approximately $800,000 and
(ii) split equally between stock options and performance shares. 


  

	 	•	 	 Stock options vest in three equal installments beginning on first anniversary of grant date. 



 

	 	•	 	 Performance shares vest in form of Company common stock based on Company’s financial performance over three-year performance period.



  

	 	•	 	 Eligible to receive indemnification agreement and change in control agreement and participate in the following other executive benefit plans:



  

	 	•	 	 Supplemental Retirement Plan; and 


  

	 	•	 	 2005 Flexible Deferral Plan. 


  

	 	•	 	 Eligible for coverage under Company’s standard medical, dental, life and disability insurance programs and to participate in Company’s standard
retirement plans.
Alejandro GARCIA-JACOBO, Petitioner, v. Marion FEATHER, Warden.

No. 19-6464.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

CROGA INNOVATIONS LTD.,

Plaintiff,

v.

PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC.

Defendant.

Case No. 2:24-cv-00208-JRG

ORDER GRANTING CHIARO TECHNOLOGY LIMITED’S 

OPPOSED MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY FROM DAO HEALTH

Before the Court is Chiaro Technology Limited’s Opposed Motion to Compel Discovery 

from Dao Health. The Court, having considered the same, is of the opinion that the motion 

should be and is hereby GRANTED. 

Case 2:23-cv-00289-JRG-RSP Document 42-4 Filed 06/11/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 418
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

STEPHANIE BROWN, on behalf of herself §

and others similarly situated, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

vs. § Civil Action No. 1:24-cv-16-MAC

§

PREMIER HEALTH SOLUTIONS, LLC, §

§

Defendant. §

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

You are hereby notified that Julie B. Tebbets of Ayers & Ayers Law Firm, enters her 

appearance on behalf of Defendant Arthur J. Gallagher & Company, in the above-referenced case, 

and hereby certifies that she is a member in good standing of the bar with this Court.

Please note this Entry of Appearance is for the purpose of all future mailings or other 

contact in this case.

DATED this 29th day of April, 2024.

Respectfully submitted,

Julie B. Tebbets

State Bar No. 00793419

jtebbets@ayersfirm.com 

AYERS & AYERS

4205 Gateway Drive, Suite 100

Colleyville, Texas 76034

(817) 267-9009 Telephone

(817) 318-0663 Facsimile

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

PREMIER HEALTH SOLUTIONS, L.L.C.

Case 1:24-cv-00016-MAC Document 12 Filed 04/29/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 99
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE Page 2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A true and correct copy of the foregoing document was filed electronically with the United 

States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas – Beaumont Division, with notice 

automatically routed to Plaintiff via the Court’s CM/ECF system on this the 29th day of April, 

2024.

Julie B. Tebbets

Case 1:24-cv-00016-MAC Document 12 Filed 04/29/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 100
Marcus DERBY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7820.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.