alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017187EN.01006001.xml

| 13.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/60

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2017/C 187/17)

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Organic coated steel products | The People’s Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 214/2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain organic coated steel products originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ L 73, 15.3.2013, p. 1). | 16.3.2018 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Organic coated steel products

The People’s Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 214/2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain organic coated steel products originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ L 73, 15.3.2013, p. 1).

16.3.2018

---

(1)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

1

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
Helga G. Suarez CLARK, Petitioner, v. Carlos Castellon CUEVA, et al.

No. 19-5373

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

Plaintiff, '

'

versus ' NO. 1:23-CR-122-MAC

'

CURTIS CLEVENGER, '

'

Defendant. '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Stetson conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued her Findings of Fact and Recommendation 

on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. Judge Stetson recommended that 

the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. She further recommended that the court adjudge 

the Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to Judge Stetson’s findings. The court ORDERS that the 

Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge are 

ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea 

agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Curtis Clevenger, is adjudged 

Case 1:23-cr-00122-MAC-ZJH Document 28 Filed 03/25/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 75
2

guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 113(a)(6)—

Assault Resulting in Serious Bodily Injury.

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 25th day of March, 2024.

Case 1:23-cr-00122-MAC-ZJH Document 28 Filed 03/25/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 76
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al., Petitioners, v. Jennifer SWEDA, et al.

No. 19-784.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Shanel STACZ, Petitioner, v. ESA MANAGEMENT, LLC, et al.

No. 19-7924.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
**Exhibit 32.1 — Certification of Chief Executive Officer — Sarbanes-Oxley Section 906**Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. section 1350, the undersigned officer of Triad Guaranty Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 andthe information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.Date: May 9, 2007         By:       /s/ Mark K. Tonnesen    Mark K. Tonnesen    President and Chief Executive Officer   The signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of Brightpoint, Inc.'s (the "Company") Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2004 (the "Report"), I,
Robert J. Laikin, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



                               /s/ Robert J. Laikin
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Robert J. Laikin
                               Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 9, 2005
Roberto SANCHEZ, Petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 19-7345.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 40087 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
PEDRO ENRIQUE SANCHEZ

- VASQUEZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:13

- CR

- 1803

- 1

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and OWEN and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
Pedro Enrique Sanchez

- Vasquez was convicted of illegal reentry into the United States and was sentenced to serve 46 months in prison. He did not timely notice his appeal from his judgment of conviction. Rather, he filed an untimely pro se notice of appeal and averred that counsel had ignored his request to timely file a notice of appeal. The district court construed this filing

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 18, 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-40087 Document: 00513276323 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/18/2015No. 15

- 40087

2 as a request to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal and denied it. The district court also noted that his notice of appeal was untimely. Now, Sanchez

- Vasquez argues that the district court should have construed his untimely pro se notice of appeal as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion seeking an out

- of

- time appeal grounded in a claim that counsel rendered ineffective assistance by not tim ely noticing his appeal. He requests that we vacate the district court’s IFP order and remand for further proceedings. We should always be aware of our jurisdiction and raise this issue on our own when necessary. United States v. Villanueva

- Diaz , 634 F .3d 844, 848 (5th Cir. 2011). “An appeal permitted by law as of right from a district court to a court of appeals may be taken only by filing a notice of appeal with the district court within the time allowed by Rule 4.” F ED

. R. A PP . P. 3(a)(1) . Thus, a notice of appeal is a mandatory precondition t o the exercise of this court’ s appellate jurisdiction. See id

. Because Sanchez

- Vasquez filed no notice of appeal from the order he is now challenging, we do not have jurisdiction over this appeal, and it is DISMISSED. Case: 15-40087 Document: 00513276323 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/18/2015
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 1731

LISA MARIE KERR , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. MARSHALL UNIVERSITY BOARD OF GOVERNORS; GENE BRETT KUHN; JUDITH SOUTHARD; SANDRA BAILEY; TERESA EAGLE; LISA HEATON, and; DAVID PITTENGER , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia , at Charleston

. Thomas E. Johnston, Chief District Judge. ( 2:14

- cv
- 12333 )

Submitted : September 24, 2020 Decided: September 28, 2020

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Lisa Marie Kerr , Appellant Pro Se. Andrew P. Smith , STEPTOE & JOHNSON PLLC , Huntington , West Virginia , for Appellees

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Lisa Marie Kerr appeals the district court’s order denying her motion under Fed. R.
Civ. P. 60 for reconsideration and to reopen her dismissed civil action for fraud or, alternatively, for an evidentiary hearing

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kerr v. Marshall Univ. Bd. of Gov ernors , No. 2:14

- cv
- 12333 (S.D.W. Va. June 5, 2020). We deny Kerr’s motion to disqualify and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argu ment would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Jorge J. RUBIO, Petitioner, v. Tina RABURN, et al.

No. 18-9482

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/07/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      156,676
COMMITMENTS
  52,790   10,037   12,361   67,480  107,209  132,631  129,607   24,045   27,069

CHANGES FROM 07/31/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -3,376)
    -299   -1,517       60   -4,157     -502   -4,396   -1,959    1,020   -1,417

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    33.7      6.4      7.9     43.1     68.4     84.7     82.7     15.3     17.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      174)
      62       18       35       57       76      129      123
```

----

Updated August 10, 2012
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

SIGNODE INDUSTRIAL GROUP LLC,

Plaintiff,

v. 

SAMUEL, SON & CO., LTD. et al,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-CV-00080-JRG

ORDER

Before the Court is the Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Move, Answer or 

Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint and Waiver of Foreign Service Requirement (the 

“Motion”) filed by Defendants Samuel, Son & Co., Ltd., Samuel, Son & Co. (USA) Inc. d/b/a 

Samuel Packaging Systems Group, and Samuel Strapping Systems (“Defendants”). (Dkt. No. 11.) 

In the Motion, the Defendants have “agreed to waive service under the Hague Convention for 

Samuel, Son & Co., Ltd., a foreign entity, in exchange for a 90-day extension of time for all 

defendants to answer or otherwise plead by June 10, 2024.” (Id. at 2.) The Motion is unopposed. 

(Id. at 3.)

Having considered the Motion, and noting its unopposed nature, the Court finds that it 

should be and hereby is GRANTED. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that the deadline for the 

Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended up to and including June 

10, 2024. However, this Order shall not excuse the parties from appearing at any future Scheduling 

Conference, as noticed by the Court, and occurring prior to June 10, 2024.

Case 2:24-cv-00080-JRG Document 12 Filed 03/01/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 105
2

____________________________________

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 1st day of March, 2024.

Case 2:24-cv-00080-JRG Document 12 Filed 03/01/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 106
PD.44177388.1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION 

EFD SPORTS, LLC,

 Plaintiff,

v.

BALLY’S CORPORATION,

 Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:24-cv-87

INDEX OF DOCUMENTS ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL 

Defendants submit this index of attached documents in support of its Notice of Removal:

Exhibit Document/Event Date 

A Index of Documents Attached to Notice of Removal

B Copy of State Court Docket Sheet 01/31/2024

C Plaintiff’s Original Petition 11/03/2023

D Citation to Bally’s Corporation 11/06/2023

E Bally’s Corporation’s Original Answer 01/30/2024

Case 4:24-cv-00087-SDJ Document 1-1 Filed 01/31/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 6
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 449 

Calling on all governments to assist in the safe return of children abducted 

from or wrongfully retained outside the country of their habitual residence. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 9, 2012 

Mr. KERRY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Calling on all governments to assist in the safe return of 

children abducted from or wrongfully retained outside 

the country of their habitual residence. 

Whereas children should be protected internationally from the 

harmful effects of their wrongful removal or retention; 

Whereas people and governments around the world value the 

importance of family and respect the rights of custody 

and access of other countries; 

Whereas governments should take all possible measures to 

determine the location of abducted children; 

Whereas Colin Bower’s two young sons, Noor and Ramsay 

Bower, were illegally abducted from the United States by 

their mother in August 2009 and taken to Egypt; and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 449 IS 

Whereas the United States and 68 other countries that are 

partners to the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects 

of International Child Abduction, done at the Hague October 25, 1980, have agreed, and encourage all other 

countries to concur, that the appropriate court for determining the best interests of children in custody matters 

is the court in the country of their habitual residence: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate calls on officials of all gov2 ernments and the competent courts to assist in the safe 

3 return of all abducted and wrongfully retained children to 

4 the state of their habitual residence, including the return 

5 of Noor and Ramsay Bower to the United States. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
John James BELL, petitioner, v. SOUTH CAROLINA.

No. 18-8679.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 5, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Todd Darrell BALLARD, Petitioner, v. Michael CLARK, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Albion, et al.

No. 19-7858.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
# C_2017264EN.01001102.xml

| 11.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 264/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 264/11

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2017/C 264/08)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 3.7.2017 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 3.7.2017 – 31.12.2017 |
| Member State | Spain |
| Stock or Group of stocks | HAD/5BC6A. |
| Species | Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) |
| Zone | Union and international waters of Vb and VIa |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 11/TQ127 |

Date and time of closure

3.7.2017

Duration

3.7.2017 – 31.12.2017

Member State

Spain

Stock or Group of stocks

HAD/5BC6A.

Species

Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus)

Melanogrammus aeglefinus

Zone

Union and international waters of Vb and VIa

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

11/TQ127

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
EXHIBIT F 

Case 2:24-cv-00021-JRG Document 44-7 Filed 06/07/24 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 1569
Map data ©2024 Google, INEGI 20 mi

Explore nearby Sam B. Hall, Jr. Federal Building

and United States Court House

3 hr 49 min

227 miles

via US-59 N

Fastest route now, avoids road

closure on US-59 N



4 hr 12 min

238 miles

 via I-45 N

1 hr 5 min

from $308

 Houston, TX—Shreveport, LA



Restaurants



Hotels



Gas stations



Parking Lots



More

SAP America Inc., 2601 Westheimer Rd Suite C250, Houston, TX 77098 to Drive 227 miles, 3 hr 49 min

Sam B. Hall, Jr. Federal Building and United States Court House, 100 E Houston St, Marshall, TX 75670

Case 2:24-cv-00021-JRG Document 44-7 Filed 06/07/24 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 1570
Map data ©2024 Google, INEGI 50 mi

Explore nearby 101 E Pecan St

5 hr 32 min

331 miles

via I-45 N

Fastest route now due to traffic

conditions



12:55AM (Friday)—9:25AM 8 hr 30 min

  





82 20 Greyhound US1100

Greyhound US1146



Restaurants



Hotels



Gas stations



Parking Lots



More

SAP America Inc., 2601 Westheimer Rd Suite C250, Houston, TX 77098 to Drive 331 miles, 5 hr 32 min

101 E Pecan St, Sherman, TX 75090

Case 2:24-cv-00021-JRG Document 44-7 Filed 06/07/24 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 1571
Map data ©2024 Google, INEGI 20 mi

Explore nearby 7940 Preston Rd

4 hr 5 min

268 miles

via I-45 N

Fastest route, the usual traffic

This route has tolls.



4 hr 24 min

278 miles

 via TX-90 N and I-45 N

1 hr 15 min

from $58

 Houston, TX—Dallas, TX



Restaurants



Hotels



Gas stations



Parking Lots



More

SAP America Inc., 2601 Westheimer Rd Suite C250, Houston, TX 77098 to Drive 268 miles, 4 hr 5 min

7940 Preston Rd, Plano, TX 75024

Case 2:24-cv-00021-JRG Document 44-7 Filed 06/07/24 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 1572
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 32(A)

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Navarre
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 13, 2004 (the "Quarterly
Report"), I, Eric H. Paulson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
            or 78o(d)); and

      2.    The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
            in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company at the end of and for the period covered
            by the Quarterly Report.

August 13, 2004                       By    /s/ Eric H. Paulson
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                               Eric H. Paulson
                                               Chairman of the Board, President
                                               and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Wave Systems Corp.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements Nos. 333-46330, 333-33236, 333-92845, 333-38265, 333-28819,
333-20017, 333-73236 and 333-65648 on Form S-3 and Nos. 333-88665, 333-68911, 333-69041,
33-97612, 333-11611 and 333-11609 on Form S-8, of our report dated March 31, 2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Wave Systems
Corp. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficiency) and other comprehensive income (loss), and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002 and for the period from February 12, 1988 (inception) through December 31, 2002 which
report appears in the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K/A of Wave Systems Corp.

Our
report dated March 31, 2003 contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has an accumulated deficit that raise substantial doubt
about its ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.



Boston,
Massachusetts
June 27, 2003

---

QuickLinks