alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Detection of HIV for Self-Testing (R61/R33 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).                    

*Date:*                         June 30, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health,  5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G21A, Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dimitrios N. Vatakis, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G21A,  Rockville, MD 20852, 301-761-7176,                         *dimitrios.vatakis@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 26, 2022. 

Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-11800 Filed 6-1-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32 (a)    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

The undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: August 8, 2003                             /s/ Eric H. Paulson
                                                 --------------------------
                                                 Eric H. Paulson
                                                 Chairman of the Board,
                                                 President and
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
Hope KERR, for Hank W. Kerr, Deceased, petitioner, v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security.

No. 17-1704.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Timothy O'LAUGHLIN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7428.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Eric WILSON, Petitioner, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 19-7204.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
United States District Court

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

MICHAEL EDGAR CONE

§

§

§ CRIMINAL NO. 4:23-CR-265-ALM-AGD

§

§ 

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, 

this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. 

The Magistrate Judge entered proposed findings of fact and recommendations (Dkt. #16) that 

Defendant be committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of 

twelve (12) months, to be served consecutively to any other term of imprisonment, with no term 

of supervised release to follow. Additionally, the Magistrate Judge recommended Defendant be 

placed at FCI Seagoville in Seagoville, Texas, if appropriate. 

Having received the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge and having received 

Defendant’s waiver of his right to object to the proposed findings and recommendations of the 

Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #15), the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the 

Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and 

conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, Defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the 

Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of twelve (12) months, to be served consecutively 

Case 4:23-cr-00265-ALM-AGD Document 17 Filed 06/08/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 75
2

to any other term of imprisonment, with no term of supervised release to follow. Additionally, the Court

recommends Defendant be placed at FCI Seagoville in Seagoville, Texas, if appropriate. 

Case 4:23-cr-00265-ALM-AGD Document 17 Filed 06/08/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 76
Case 2:24-cv-00021-JRG Document 48-2 Filed 06/18/24 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 1734
Case 2:24-cv-00021-JRG Document 48-2 Filed 06/18/24 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 1735
Case 2:24-cv-00021-JRG Document 48-2 Filed 06/18/24 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 1736
 

Case 2:24-cv-00021-JRG Document 48-2 Filed 06/18/24 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 1737
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2003 (the Report), I,  James K. Price, President and Chief
Executive Officer of TurboChef Technologies, Inc. (the Company), do hereby
certify, pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that:

| | (i) | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (ii) | the
information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and  results of operation of the Company.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated:
November 22, 2004

| | /s/
        James K. Price                                
| | ----------------------------------------------------------
| | James K. Price
      President and Chief Executive Officer
Unassociated Document


Exhibit 10.18







MEMO FROM SIBLING ENTERTAINMENT HOLDINGS, INC.







Date: October 24, 2011







From: Gerald Sullivan, Chairman







TO:   Oswald Gayle







RE: Conversion of Debt







As Chairman of Sibling Entertainment, I want to thank you for your willingness to help us by agreeing to accept shares of the common stock of SIBE in exchange for our obligations to you. Please accept this as support for the issuance as noted below:







On October 24, 2011, the Company entered into an agreement Oswald A. Gayle, CFO, pursuant to which the Company issued 200,000 shares of common stock valued at $40,000, as an


incentive bonus. These were issued on October 24, 2011.







Please note that these shares are restricted under Rule 144 and cannot be traded for at least six (6) months. Also note that the stock trades infrequently, and there may be no trading market for the shares when you are ready to trade. Also note that the Series common stock, which you are an owner of, may convert into common stock and that event may cause dilution to the common stock, and reduce the share price, or market for the stock.












Thanks again, and I look forward to working with you going forward.







/s/ GERALD F. SULLIVAN


Gerald F. Sullivan


Chairman
AO 120 (Rev. 08/10) 

TO: Mail Stop 8

Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

P.O. Box 1450

Alexandria, VA 22313-1450

REPORT ON THE

FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN

ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR

TRADEMARK

In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been

filed in the U.S. District Court on the following

G Trademarks or G Patents. ( G the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):

DOCKET NO. DATE FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT

PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:

DATE INCLUDED INCLUDED BY

G Amendment G Answer G Cross Bill G Other Pleading

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:

DECISION/JUDGEMENT

CLERK (BY) DEPUTY CLERK DATE

Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director

Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy

NKL

Accordingly, the Motion

hereby is GRANTED, and as such, the Court ORDERS this case DISMISSED WITH

PREJUDICE.

Eastern District of Texas ✔

2:23-cv-630 12/27/2023 Eastern District of Texas

SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC, ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GMBH LTD.,

8,936,190 1/20/2015 SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS LLC 8,651,369 2/18/2014 SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS LLC Print Save As... Reset

6/14/2024

Case 2:23-cv-00630-JRG Document 15 Filed 06/14/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 151
Damon J. SOLGADO, petitioner, v. Colby BRAUN, Warden.

No. 18-6290.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 5, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for leave to file a petition for rehearing denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title
18, United States Code)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Reptron Electronics, Inc., Inc., a Florida corporation (the Company), does hereby certify that:



To my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the
year ended December 31, 2003 (the Form 10-K/A) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|               |  |  |  |                                                     
|-------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|               |  | 
|April 29, 2004 |  |  |  | By: /s/ Paul J. Plante                              
|               |  |  |  |                                                     
|Date           |  |  |  | Paul J. Plante President and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
James F. OLIVEIRA, petitioner, v. Patricia A. COYNE-FAGUE, et al.

No. 18-8443.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 15, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Jesus Alonso GONZALEZ GONZALEZ, aka Jesus Gonzalez, aka Jesus Alonzo Gonzalez, aka Alonzo Gonzalez, aka Roberto Soto, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5138

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6594

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. OWEN ODMAN, a/k/a Star , Defendant

- Appellant.

No. 20
- 6726

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. OWEN ODMAN, a/k/a Star , Defendant

- Appellant.

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Shelby

. Martin K. Reidinger , Chief District Judge. ( 4:96

- cr
- 00053

- MR

- 1 )

Submitted : September 30, 2020 Decided: October 19, 20202 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Owen Odman , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Owen Odman appeals the district court’s order s : (1) denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to section 404 of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115

- 391, § 404, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222 (“First Step Act”), which permits a district court to impose a reduced sentence for defendants convicted of covered offenses as if certain provisions of the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, Pub. L. No. 111

- 220, §§ 2

- 3, 124 Stat. 2372, 2372, were in effect at the time the covered offense was committed , and (2) his motion for reconsideration

. The district court deni ed Odman’s First Step Act motion because, based on the drug quantities for which he was held accountable at sentencing , the
court concluded the statutory penalties to which Odman was subjected were not modified by Section 2 of the Fair Sentencing Act. In light of our decisions in United States v. Wirsing , 943 F.3d 175 (4th Cir. 2019), and United States v. Gravatt , 953 F.3d 258 (4th Cir. 2020), we vacate the district court’s order s and remand for consideration on the merits. We express no opinion on the ul timate disposition of Odman’ s First Step Act motion. See
Gravatt , 953 F.3d at 264.
W e deny Odman’s motion for appointment of counsel and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
VACATED AND REMANDED
<PAGE>   1




                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                   LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF OLYMPIC STEEL, INC.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                           STATE OF ORGANIZATION               % OWNERSHIP
------------------                           ---------------------               -----------

<S>                                          <C>                                 <C>
Olympia International, Inc.                  U.S. Virgin Islands                 100%

Olympic Steel Lafayette, Inc.                Ohio                                100%

Olympic Steel Minneapolis, Inc.              Minnesota                           100%

Olympic Steel Receivables, Inc.              Delaware                            100%

Olympic Steel Receivables LLC                Delaware                            100%  (a)

Olympic Steel Trading, Inc.                  Ohio                                100%

Oly Steel Welding, Inc.                      Michigan                            100%

Olympic Steel Iowa, Inc.                     Iowa                                100%  (b)

Olympic Continental Resources LLC            Ohio                                 45%  (c)

OLP LLC                                      Michigan                             50%  (d)

Trumark Steel & Processing LLC               Michigan                             49%  (e)
</TABLE>




(a)  Owned 100% by Olympic Steel, Inc. and Olympic Steel Receivables, Inc.

(b)  Owned 100% by Olympic Steel Minneapolis, Inc.

(c)  Owned 45% by Olympic Steel Trading, Inc.

(d)  Owned 50% by Oly Steel Welding, Inc.

(e)  Owned 49% by Oly Steel Welding, Inc.
Adam J. WINARSKE, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9781

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Malcolm MCGEE, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-38

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Jamaal A. MCNEIL, Petitioner v. NEBRASKA, et al.

No. 18-9014

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Dillon MVURI, Petitioner, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.

No. 19-7257

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Glen Gary GUYN, Petitioner, v. Jason KENT, Warden.

No. 19-7628.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 6, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
## **EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS REQUIRED BY**

# **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

# ** **

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof Steinway Musical Instruments, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dana D. Messina, Chief Executive Officerof the Company, certify that to the best of my knowledge:

 

1. The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|                 | /s/ Dana D.  Messina                   |
|----------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                 |                                   |
|                 | President and Chief  Executive Officer |
|                 | (Principal  Executive Officer)         |
|                 |                                   |
|                 |                                   |
| August 8,  2008 |                                   |

 

----
James BARNES, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 18-6749.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Michael Franklin EINFELDT, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 18-9830

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION 

CHANSLER DEPAUL MALLARD, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

OFFICER KRICK, et al., 

 Defendants. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Case No. 6:23-cv-65-JDK-KNM 

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Plaintiff Chansler Depaul Mallard, a Texas Department of Criminal Justice 

inmate proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell for 

findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for disposition. 

On October 17, 2023, Judge Mitchell issued a Report recommending that the 

Court dismiss this case without prejudice for want of prosecution and Plaintiff’s 

failure to comply with a Court order. Docket No. 10. A copy of this Report was sent 

to Plaintiff. However, no objections have been received. 

This Court reviews the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge de 

novo only if a party objects within fourteen days of service of the Report and 

Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In conducting a de novo review, the Court 

examines the entire record and makes an independent assessment under the law. 

Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), 

Case 6:23-cv-00065-JDK-KNM Document 11 Filed 01/04/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 10
2 

superseded on other grounds by statute, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (extending the time to 

file objections from ten to fourteen days). 

Here, Plaintiff did not object in the prescribed period. The Court therefore 

reviews the Magistrate Judge’s findings for clear error or abuse of discretion and 

reviews the legal conclusions to determine whether they are contrary to law. See 

United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 

918 (1989) (holding that, if no objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Report are filed, the 

standard of review is “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law”). 

Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and the record in this case, 

the Court finds no clear error or abuse of discretion and no conclusions contrary to 

law. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the 

United States Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 10) as the findings of this Court. It is 

therefore ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for want of 

prosecution and Plaintiff’s failure to comply with an order of the Court. 

So ORDERED and SIGNED this day of

___________________________________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 4th January, 2024.

Case 6:23-cv-00065-JDK-KNM Document 11 Filed 01/04/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 11