34246 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 108 / Monday, June 6, 2022 / Notices 

14See 19 CFR 351.212(b). 

15See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 

16See Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-ToLength Plate from Austria, Belgium, France, the 

Federal Republic of Germany, Italy, Japan, the 

Republic of Korea, and Taiwan: Amended Final 

Affirmative Antidumping Determinations for 

France, the Federal Republic of Germany, the 

Republic of Korea and Taiwan, and Antidumping 

Duty Orders, 82 FR 24096, 24098 (May 25, 2017) 

(CTL Plate Order). 

17For a full discussion of this practice, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003). 18See CTL Plate Order, 82 FR 24098. 

Assessment Rates 

Upon completion of the 

administrative review, Commerce shall 

determine, and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries.14

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we 

calculated importer-specific ad valorem 

duty assessment rates based on the ratio 

of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for the examined sales to the 

total entered value of the sales. Where 

either the respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is zero or de 

minimis, within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific 

rate is zero or de minimis, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate 

entries without regard to antidumping 

duties.15

The final results of this review shall 

be the basis for the assessment of 

antidumping duties on entries of 

merchandise covered by the final results 

of this review and for future deposits of 

estimated duties, where applicable. 

Commerce’s ‘‘automatic assessment’’ 

practice will apply to entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR produced 

by Industeel for which it did not know 

that the merchandise it sold to the 

intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading 

company, or exporter) was destined for 

the United States. In such instances, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate 

unreviewed entries at the all-others 

rate 16 if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction.17

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

For the companies for which the 

administrative review is rescinded, we 

will instruct CBP to assess antidumping 

duties on all appropriate entries at a rate 

equal to the cash deposit of estimated 

antidumping duties required at the time 

of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, 

for consumption, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective for all shipments of the 

subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the 

cash deposit rate for Industeel will be 

equal to the weighted-average dumping 

margin established in the final results of 

this review, except if the rate is less 

than 0.50 percent and, therefore, de 

minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash 

deposit rate will be zero; (2) for 

previously investigated companies not 

participating in this review, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific cash deposit rate 

published for the most recently 

completed segment; (3) if the exporter is 

not a firm covered in this review, a prior 

review, or the original less-than-fairvalue (LTFV) investigation, but the 

producer is, then the cash deposit rate 

will be the cash deposit rate established 

for the most recently completed segment 

for the producer of the merchandise; 

and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 

producers or exporters will continue to 

be 5.40 percent, the all-others rate 

established in the LTFV investigation.18

These cash deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

preliminary results in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: May 27, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Partial Rescission of Administrative 

Review 

V. Discussion of the Methodology 

VI. Currency Conversion 

VII. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

List of Companies for Which This Review 

Has Been Rescinded 

Producer/exporter 

A.G. der Dillinger Hutte. 

BBC Chartering Belgium. 

C.A. Picard GmbH. 

Doerrenberg Edelstahl GmbH. 

DMC Nobelclad Europe S.A. 

Edgen Murray. 

EEW Steel Trading LLC. 

Erndtebrucker Eisenwerk GmbH & Co. KG. 

Fike Europe B.A. 

Industeel France S.A.S. 

Logiudice Forni SRL. 

Macsteel International. 

Nialco S.A. 

NLMK Clabecq S.A. 

NLMK Dansteel A.S. 

NLMK Plate Sales S.A. 

NLMK Sales Europe S.A. 

NLMK Manage Steel Center S.A. 

NLMK La Louviere S.A. 

NLMK Verona SpP. 

NobelClad Europe GmbH & Co. KG. 

RP Technik GmbH Profilsysteme. 

Salzgitter Mannesmann International GmbH. 

Stahlo Stahl Service GmbH & Co. KG. 

Stemcor USA, Inc. 

Thyssenkrupp Steel Europe AG. 

TWF Treuhandgesellschaft Werbefilm mbH. 

Tranter Service Centers. 

Valcovny Trub Chomutov A.s. 

Voestalpine Grobblech GmbH. 

[FR Doc. 2022–12086 Filed 6–3–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–475–834] 

Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-ToLength Plate From Italy: Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Preliminary 

Determination of No Shipments; 2020– 

2021 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 108 / Monday, June 6, 2022 / Notices 34247 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 

35481 (July 6, 2021). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Preliminary Results of 2020–2021 Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated January 6, 

2022. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results of the 2020–2021 

Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-ToLength Plate from Italy,’’ dated concurrently with, 

and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum). 

4See Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-ToLength Plate from Austria, Belgium, France, the 

Federal Republic of Germany, Italy, Japan, the 

Republic of Korea, and Taiwan: Amended Final 

Affirmative Antidumping Determinations for 

France, the Federal Republic of Germany, the 

Republic of Korea, and Taiwan, and Antidumping 

Duty Orders, 82 FR 24096, 24098 (May 25, 2017). 

5For a full description of the scope of the Order, 

see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

6See Lyman’s Letter ‘‘Certain Carbon and Alloy 

Steel Cut-to-Length Plate from Italy; Lyman Steel 

Company’s Certification of No Sales, Shipments, or 

Entries,’’ dated July 28, 2021. 

7See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Carbon and Alloy 

Steel Cut-to-Length Plate from Italy (A–475–834),’’ 

dated September 80, 2021. 

8See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

from Thailand; Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of 

Review, Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments; 2012–2013, 79 FR 15951, 15952 (March 

24, 2014), unchanged in Certain Frozen Warmwater 

Shrimp from Thailand: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final 

Determination of No Shipments, and Partial 

Rescission of Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 51306 

(August 28, 2014). 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 

determines that the producers/exporters 

subject to this administrative review 

made sales of subject merchandise at 

less than normal value (NV) during the 

period of review (POR) May 1, 2020, 

through April 30, 2021. Additionally, 

Commerce preliminarily determines 

that a company for which we initiated 

a review had no shipments during the 

POR. Interested parties are invited to 

comment on these preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable June 6, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Alice Maldonado or David Crespo, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–4682 or (202) 482–3693, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 6, 2021, based on timely 

requests for review in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we initiated an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

carbon and alloy steel cut-to-length 

plate from Italy.1 This review covers 11 

producers and/or exporters of the 

subject merchandise. Commerce 

selected two companies, NLMK Verona 

SpA (NVR) and Officine Tecnosider 

s.r.l. (OTS), for individual examination. 

One company, Lyman Steel Company 

(Lyman), reported having no shipments 

during the POR, see ‘‘Preliminary 

Determination of No Shipments’’ 

section below. The remaining producers 

and/or exporters not selected for 

individual examination are listed in the 

‘‘Preliminary Results of the Review’’ 

section of this notice. 

On January 6, 2022, Commerce 

extended the preliminary results of this 

review by 120 days, until May 31, 

2022.2 For a complete description of the 

events that followed the initiation of 

this review, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum.3

Scope of the Order 4

The products covered by the Order 

are certain carbon and alloy steel hotrolled or forged flat plate products not 

in coils, whether or not painted, 

varnished, or coated with plastics or 

other non-metallic substances from 

Italy. Products subject to the order are 

currently classified in the Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States 

(HTSUS) under item numbers: 

7208.40.3030, 7208.40.3060, 

7208.51.0030, 7208.51.0045, 

7208.51.0060, 7208.52.0000, 

7211.13.0000, 7211.14.0030, 

7211.14.0045, 7225.40.1110, 

7225.40.1180, 7225.40.3005, 

7225.40.3050, 7226.20.0000, and 

7226.91.5000. Although the HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the merchandise 

subject to this scope is dispositive.5

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) 

and (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act). Export price and 

constructed export price are calculated 

in accordance with section 772 of the 

Act. NV is calculated in accordance 

with section 773 of the Act. 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. A list of the 

topics discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is attached as an 

appendix to this notice. The Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

One company under review, Lyman, 

filed a statement reporting that it made 

no shipments of subject merchandise to 

the United States during the POR.6 We 

were able to confirm Lyman’s claim 

with U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP).7 Consequently, we 

preliminarily determine that Lyman had 

no shipments during the POR. 

Consistent with our practice, we find 

that it is not appropriate to 

preliminarily rescind the review with 

respect to this company, and we will 

instead complete the review for this 

company and issue appropriate 

instructions to CBP based on the final 

results of this review.8

Preliminary Results of the Review 

We preliminarily determine that the 

following weighted-average dumping 

margins exist for the period May 1, 

2020, through April 30, 2021: 

Producer/exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

NLMK Verona SpA ..................... 1.47 

Officine Tecnosider s.r.l .............. 20.44 

Arvedi Tubi Acciaio ..................... 4.43 

C.M.T. Construzioni Meccaniche 

di Taglione Emilio & C. S.a.s .. 4.43 

O.ME.P SpA ............................... 4.43 

Ofar SpA ..................................... 4.43 

Officine Meccaniche M.A.M. s.r.l 4.43 

Sesa SpA .................................... 4.43 

SZ Acroni D.o.o .......................... 4.43 

Tim-Cop Doo Temerin ................ 4.43 

Rate for Non-Examined Companies 

The Act and Commerce’s regulations 

do not address the establishment of a 

weighted-average dumping margin to be 

applied to companies not selected for 

individual examination when 

Commerce limits its examination in an 

administrative review pursuant to 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, 

Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of 

the Act, which provides instructions for 

calculating the all-others rate in a lessthan-fair-value investigation, for 

guidance when calculating the 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

companies that were not selected for 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
34248 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 108 / Monday, June 6, 2022 / Notices 

9For more information regarding the calculation 

of this margin, see Memorandum, ‘‘Calculation of 

the Cash Deposit Rate for Non-Reviewed 

Companies,’’ dated concurrently with this notice. 

As the weighting factor, we relied on the publicly 

ranged sales data reported in the quantity and value 

charts submitted by NVR and OTS. 

10See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

11Commerce is exercising its discretion, under 19 

CFR 351.309(d)(1), to alter the time limit for filing 

of rebuttal briefs. 

12See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

13See 19 CFR 351.303. 

14See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

15See 19 CFR 351.310(d). 

16See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD 

Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension 

of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 

17See Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

18See 19 CFR 351.212(b). 

19For a full discussion of this practice, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003). 

individual examination in an 

administrative review. Under section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others 

rate is normally an amount equal to the 

weighted average of the estimated 

weighted-average dumping margins 

established for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding 

rates that are zero, de minimis (i.e., less 

than 0.5 percent), or determined entirely 

on the basis of facts available. 

Consistent with section 735(c)(5)(A) 

of the Act, we determined the weightedaverage dumping margin for each of the 

non-selected companies by using the 

weighted-average dumping margins 

calculated for NVR and OTS in this 

administrative review.9

Verification 

As provided in section 782(i)(3) of the 

Act, Commerce intends to verify the 

information relied upon in making its 

final results of the review. 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

Commerce intends to disclose the 

calculations performed in connection 

with these preliminary results to 

interested parties within five days after 

the date of publication of this notice.10

Case briefs or other written comments 

may be submitted to Commerce. A 

timeline for the submission of case 

briefs and written comments will be 

provided to interested parties at a later 

date. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues 

raised in the case briefs, may be filed no 

later than seven days after the time limit 

for filing case briefs.11 Parties who 

submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in 

this proceeding are encouraged to 

submit with each argument: (1) a 

statement of the issue; (2) a brief 

summary of the argument; and (3) a 

table of authorities.12 Case and rebuttal 

briefs should be filed using ACCESS.13

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing must submit a written request to 

the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, filed electronically via 

ACCESS within 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice.14 Hearing 

requests should contain: (1) the party’s 

name, address, and telephone number; 

(2) the number of participants; and (3) 

a list of issues to be discussed. Issues 

raised in the hearing will be limited to 

issues raised in the briefs. If a request 

for a hearing is made, Commerce 

intends to hold the hearing at a date and 

time to be determined.15 Parties should 

confirm the date, time, and location of 

the hearing two days before the 

scheduled date. 

An electronically-filed document 

must be received successfully in its 

entirety by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. 

Eastern Time on the established 

deadline. Note that Commerce has 

temporarily modified certain of its 

requirements for serving documents 

containing business proprietary 

information, until further notice.16

Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of this administrative review, 

including the results of its analysis of 

issues raised in any written briefs, not 

later than 120 days after the date of 

publication of this notice, unless 

otherwise extended.17

Assessment Rates 

Upon completion of the 

administrative review, Commerce shall 

determine, and CBP shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries.18

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

where the respondent reported the 

entered value of its U.S. sales, we 

calculated importer-specific ad valorem 

duty assessment rates based on the ratio 

of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for the examined sales to the 

total entered value of the sales for which 

entered value was reported. Where the 

respondent did not report entered value 

or reported amounts based on estimated 

sales data, we calculated the entered 

value in order to calculate the 

assessment rate. Where either the 

respondent’s weighted-average dumping 

margin is zero or de minimis, within the 

meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an 

importer-specific rate is zero or de 

minimis, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

For the companies that were not 

selected for individual review, we will 

assign an assessment rate based on the 

average of the cash deposit rates 

calculated for NVR and OTS, excluding 

any rates that are zero, de minimis, or 

determined entirely based on adverse 

facts available. The final results of this 

review shall be the basis for the 

assessment of antidumping duties on 

entries of merchandise covered by the 

final results of this review and for future 

deposits of estimated duties, where 

applicable. 

Commerce’s ‘‘automatic assessment’’ 

will apply to entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR produced 

by companies included in the final 

results of this review for which the 

reviewed companies did not know that 

the merchandise they sold to the 

intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading 

company, or exporter) was destined for 

the United States. In such instances, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate 

unreviewed entries at the all-others rate 

if there is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction.19

Further, if we continue to find in the 

final results that Lyman had no 

shipments of subject merchandise 

during the POR, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate any suspended entries that 

entered under its AD case number (i.e., 

at that exporter’s rate) at the all-others 

rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction. 

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective for all shipments of the 

subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the 

cash deposit rate for the exporters listed 

above will be equal to the weightedaverage dumping margin established in 

the final results of this review, except if 

the rate is less than 0.50 percent and, 

therefore, de minimis within the 

meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in 

which case the cash deposit rate will be 

zero; (2) for companies not participating 

in this review, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 108 / Monday, June 6, 2022 / Notices 34249 

20See Order. 

1See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada: 

Antidumping Duty Order, 84 FR 18775 (May 2, 

2019) (Order). 

2See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 

35481 (July 6, 2021) (Initiation Notice). 

3 In the underlying investigation, Commerce 

treated Evraz Inc. NA, Evraz Inc. NA Canada, and 

the Canadian National Steel Corporation 

(collectively, Evraz) as a single entity. See Order. 

There is no information on the record of this 

administrative review that indicates a change 

would be warranted of this single entity 

determination. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Respondent Selection,’’ 

dated August 10, 2021. 5See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review,’’ dated January 3, 2022. 6See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review,’’ dated April 25, 2022. 

7See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review: Large Diameter Welded 

Pipe from Canada; 2020–2021,’’ dated concurrently 

with, and hereby adopted by, this notice 

(Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 

8The Domestic Interested Party is the American 

Line Pipe Producers Association Trade Committee. 

9See Domestic Interested Party’s Letter, 

‘‘Withdrawal of Review Request,’’ dated October 4, 

2021. 

10See Domestic Interested Party’s Letter, 

‘‘Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated June 1, 

Continued 

cash deposit rate published for the most 

recently completed segment; (3) if the 

exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review or the original less-than-fairvalue (LTFV) investigation, but the 

producer is, then the cash deposit rate 

will be the cash deposit rate established 

for the most recently completed segment 

for the producer of the merchandise; 

and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 

producers or exporters will continue to 

be 6.08 percent, the all-others rate 

established in the LTFV investigation.20

These deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

preliminary results in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: May 31, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

V. Companies Not Selected for Individual 

Examination 

VI. Discussion of the Methodology 

VII. Currency Conversion 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–12095 Filed 6–3–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–122–863] 

Large Diameter Welded Pipe From 

Canada: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Partial Rescission of 

Administrative Review; 2020–2021 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty (AD) order on large 

diameter welded pipe (welded pipe) 

from Canada. The period of review 

(POR) is May 1, 2020, through April 30, 

2021. The review covers 46 producers or 

exporters of the subject merchandise 

including the sole mandatory 

respondent, Evraz. We preliminarily 

determine that Evraz made sales of 

subject merchandise at prices below 

normal value (NV) during the POR. We 

are also rescinding this administrative 

review for 42 companies for which this 

review was initiated. Interested parties 

are invited to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable June 6, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Irene Gorelik or Patrick Crotty, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–6905 or (202) 482–0568, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On May 2, 2019, Commerce published 

the AD order on welded pipe from 

Canada.1 On July 10, 2020, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(i), 

Commerce initiated an administrative 

review of the Order, covering 46 

producers or exporters of the subject 

merchandise.2 On August 10, 2021, we 

selected Evraz 3 as the sole mandatory 

respondent in this administrative 

review.4 Pursuant to section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act), Commerce 

determined that it was not practicable to 

complete the preliminary results of this 

review within 245 days, and extended 

the deadline for the preliminary results 

of this review by 100 days, until May 

11, 2022.5 Subsequently, Commerce 

extended the deadline for the 

preliminary results by an additional 16 

days, until May 27, 2022.6

For a detailed description of the 

events that followed the initiation of 

this review, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum.7 A list of topics 

discussed in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is included as Appendix 

I to this notice. The Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Scope of the Order 

The product covered by the Order is 

welded pipe from Canada. For a full 

description of the scope of the Order, 

see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

Partial Rescission of Review 

On October 4, 2021, the Domestic 

Interested Party 8 filed a timely letter 

withdrawing its review request for all 

companies that it had requested.9

Commerce notes that the Domestic 

Interested Party requested review of 

Canadian National Steel Corp.; Evraz 

Inc. NA; Evraz Inc. NA Canada; and The 

Canadian National Steel Corporation.10


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1