alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Stanley James OLIVER, Petitioner, v. Glenn JOHNSON, et al.

No. 19-5348

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
KOHN LAW GROUP, INC., petitioner, v. AUTO PARTS MANUFACTURING MISSISSIPPI, INC.

No. 18-408.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

*641Motion of Federal Bar Association SDNY Chapter, Network of Bar Leaders, et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Robert James JAFFE, Petitioner, v. Brad SHERMAN, United States Congressman.

No. 19-1004.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

RAYMOND ROBINSON §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23cv449

WARDEN GARRIDO §

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING VENUE

Petitioner Raymond Robinson, an inmate confined in the Federal Medical Center at Fort

Worth, Texas, filed this petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

A petition filed pursuant to Section 2241 must be filed in the judicial district where the

petitioner is incarcerated. United States v. Gabor, 905 F.2d 76, 78 (5th Cir. 1990).1 The Federal

Medical Center is located in Tarrant County, Texas. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 124, Tarrant County

is in the Fort Worth Division of the Northern District of Texas. As petitioner is not confined within

the Eastern District of Texas, this court lacks jurisdiction over his petition. Accordingly, this

petition will be transferred to the Fort Worth Division of the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Texas.

ORDER

For the reasons set forth above, it is ORDERED that this petition for writ of habeas corpus

is TRANSFERRED to the Fort Worth Division of the United States District Court for the Northern

District of Texas.

1

 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d), an application for a writ of habeas corpus filed by a person

incarcerated pursuant to judgment of a state court may be filed in the federal judicial district where the petitioner is

incarcerated or the district in which he was convicted. However, petitioner is not incarcerated pursuant to a state

court judgment. 

_________________________

Zack Hawthorn

United States Magistrate Judge SIGNED this 15th day of December, 2023.

Case 1:23-cv-00449-MAC-ZJH Document 2 Filed 12/15/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 11
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 07/09/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      335,927
COMMITMENTS
  99,938  119,503   74,536  135,037  114,041  309,511  308,080   26,416   27,847

CHANGES FROM 07/02/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     34,579)
  12,240   17,045   -7,181   26,209   18,161   31,268   28,025    3,311    6,554

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    29.7     35.6     22.2     40.2     33.9     92.1     91.7      7.9      8.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      161)
      44       70       76       31       33      127      136
```

----

Updated July 13, 2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          72,320
<SECURITIES>                                     8,745
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,212
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               129,621
<PP&E>                                          43,574
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,656
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 252,555
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,689
<BONDS>                                        130,896
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          110,190
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                    (62,475)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   252,555
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               280,082
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  122,291
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,115
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,387
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                115,289
<INCOME-TAX>                                    41,962
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    537
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    72,790
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     6.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     6.10
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, Stephen P. Robeck, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of EMAK Worldwide, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatedto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based onsuch evaluation; andc. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.         /s/ Stephen P. Robeck   Stephen P. Robeck   Chairman of the Board and  Chief Executive Officer (Interim)
EXHIBIT 99

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ultimate Electronics, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
October 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|/s/J. EDWARD MCENTIREJ. Edward McEntire
Chief Executive Officer
December 13, 2002 |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ALAN E. KESSOCKAlan E. Kessock
Chief Financial Officer
December 13, 2002       |  | 



QuickLinks
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  filing  of the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal  quarter  ended June 30, 2002 (the  Report) by Prime  Retail,  Inc.  (the
Company), the undersigned, as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     The  information contained  in the  Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

    Date: August 14, 2002                  /s/  Robert A. Brvenik
                                           --------------------------
                                           Robert A. Brvenik
                                           Executive Vice President,
                                           Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Christopher SANCHEZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7839.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 6, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          28,649
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,350
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       3,946,532
<DEPRECIATION>                                 201,788
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,012,011
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,824,303
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    368,373
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,353,025
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,012,011
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               263,924
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   73,126
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                52,026
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              60,198
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 78,574
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             81,775
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    68,859
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.11


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 100 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 100

  Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony to 
 commemorate the 50th anniversary of the enactment of the Civil Rights 
                              Act of 1964.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 22, 2014

  Ms. Fudge submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony to 
 commemorate the 50th anniversary of the enactment of the Civil Rights 
                              Act of 1964.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF THE ROTUNDA OF THE CAPITOL FOR CEREMONY TO 
              COMMEMORATE THE 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE ENACTMENT OF THE 
              CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964.

    The rotunda of the United States Capitol is authorized to be used 
on June 24, 2014, for a ceremony to commemorate the 50th anniversary of 
the enactment of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the significant 
impact the Act had on the Civil Rights movement. Physical preparations 
for the conduct of the ceremony shall be carried out in accordance with 
such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-50815 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GUSTAVO ALVAREZ-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-00-CR-210-1-FB

- - - - - - - - - - April 12, 2001 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Gustavo Alvarez-Hernandez appeals his sentence following his guilty plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Alvarez argues that his sentence should not have exceeded the two-year maximum sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Alvarez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 120 S. Ct. 2348 (2000).No. 00-50815 - 2 - Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 120 S. Ct. at 2362; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). Alvarez’s argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , 523 U.S. at 235. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is granted.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Exhibit 32.2

              SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350),
the undersigned,  Robert E. Tomlinson, Chief Financial Officer of Onstream Media
Corporation  (the "Company") has executed this  certification in connection with
the filing with the Securities and Exchange  Commission of the Company's  Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report").

      The  undersigned  certifies  that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the undersigned has executed this certification as of
the 12th day of January 2006.


                                          ONSTREAM MEDIA CORPORATION

                                          /s/ Robert E. Tomlinson
                                          ------------------------
                                          Name: Robert E. Tomlinson
                                          Title: Chief Financial Officer
Jeffrey KIRSCH, Petitioner, v. REDWOOD RECOVERY SERVICES, LLC, et al.

No. 19-1016.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nevada denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA '

'

versus ' NO. 1:23-CR-124-MAC

'

EULICE EMERSON ALVEY '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Stetson conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued her Findings of Fact and Recommendation 

on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. Judge Stetson recommended that 

the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. She further recommended that the court adjudge 

the Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to Judge Stetson’s findings. The court ORDERS that the 

Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge are 

ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea 

agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Eulice Emerson Alvey, is 

Case 1:23-cr-00124-MAC-ZJH Document 60 Filed 08/29/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 243
2

adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349 -

Conspiracy to Commit Bank Fraud.

Case 1:23-cr-00124-MAC-ZJH Document 60 Filed 08/29/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 244
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2330 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2330

  To name the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic under 
 construction at 2900 Veterans Way, Melbourne, Florida, as the ``Jerry 
      O'Brien Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 23, 1999

  Mr. Weldon of Florida (for himself, Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. Stearns, Ms. 
Brown of Florida, Mr. Goss, Mr. Diaz-Balart, Mr. Young of Florida, Mrs. 
 Fowler, Mr. Scarborough, Mr. Mica, Mr. Shaw, Mr. McCollum, Mr. Boyd, 
 Mrs. Thurman, Mr. Davis of Florida, Mr. Canady of Florida, Mr. Miller 
  of Florida, Mr. Foley, Mrs. Meek of Florida, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, Mr. 
   Hastings of Florida, Mr. Deutsch, and Mr. Wexler) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To name the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic under 
 construction at 2900 Veterans Way, Melbourne, Florida, as the ``Jerry 
      O'Brien Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS OUTPATIENT CLINIC, 
              MELBOURNE, FLORIDA.

    The Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic under 
construction at 2900 Veterans Way, Melbourne, Florida, shall after the 
date of the enactment of this Act be known and designated as the 
``Jerry O'Brien Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic''. Any 
reference to such outpatient clinic in any law, regulation, map, 
document, record, or other paper of the United States shall be 
considered to be a reference to the Jerry O'Brien Department of 
Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic.
                                 <all>
```
S.N., et al., petitioners, v. SAN DIEGO HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY, et al.

No. 18-8542.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 15, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Chris A. WALTERS, Petitioner, v. Andrew M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security.

No. 19-7809.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
IN RE David GULBRANDSON, Petitioner.

No. 19-7393.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 27, 2020

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Sheila JACKSON, Petitioner, v. GARDA CL EAST, INC.

No. 19-6866

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.