alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

ROCHE DIABETES CARE, LTD.,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00585-JRG-RSP

PATENT CASE

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Display Technologies, LLC (“Display Technologies”) filed this 

action against Defendant Roche Diabetes Care Limited (“RDC Limited”) on December 11, 2023;

NOW, THEREFORE, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Display Technologies and 

RDC Limited hereby stipulate that Display Technologies’ claims in this action are dismissed with 

prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

Case 2:23-cv-00585-JRG-RSP Document 42 Filed 08/05/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1765
2

Dated: August 5, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Randall Garteiser By: /s/ Aaron P. Pirouznia

Randall T. Garteiser

Texas Bar No. 24038912

rgarteiser@ghiplaw.com

Christopher A. Honea

Texas Bar No. 24059967

chonea@ghiplaw.com

M. Scott Fuller

Texas Bar No. 24036607

rgarteiser@ghiplaw.com

GARTEISER HONEA, PLLC

119 W. Ferguson Street

Tyler, Texas 75702

Telephone: (903) 705-7420

Facsimile: (903) 405-3999

Terry J. Stalford

Texas Bar No. 24011686

stalford@fr.com

Aaron P. Pirouznia

Texas Bar No. 24098958

pirouznia@fr.com

Noel F. Chakkalakal

Texas Bar No. 24053676

chakkalakal@fr.com

Alexander H. Martin

Texas Bar No. 24091828

martin@fr.com

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

1717 Main Street, Suite 5000

Dallas, TX 75201

Telephone: (214) 747-5070

COUNSEL OF PLAINTIFF 

DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES, LLC

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT

ROCHE DIABETES CARE, LIMITED

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document has been served on August 5, 2024, to all counsel of record who are deemed to have 

consented to electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system. 

/s/ Aaron P. Pirouznia

Aaron P. Pirouznia

Case 2:23-cv-00585-JRG-RSP Document 42 Filed 08/05/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1766
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THIRD 
QUARTER 1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                          45,033
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,009,239
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    694,278
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,049,769
<PP&E>                                      18,527,522
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,599,317
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,431,840
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,158,519
<BONDS>                                        697,187
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        36,563
<OTHER-SE>                                     539,571
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,431,840
<SALES>                                      3,477,430
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,477,430
<CGS>                                        1,990,432
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,990,432
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               265,793
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             348,866
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (45,193)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (45,193)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (45,193)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 627 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

S. Res. 627

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                                                     December 20, 2012.
    Resolved, That the following Senator is designated as chairman of the 
following committee:
    Committee on Appropriations: Ms. Mikulski, of Maryland.
            Attest:

                                                                      Secretary.
```
Yervin Keith BARNETT, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES; and

Verlon Sesson, Petitioner, v. United States.

No. 19-7664.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 591 

Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding Raymond Weeks and his efforts 

in the establishment of Veterans Day. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 13, 2012 

Mr. SESSIONS (for himself and Mr. SHELBY) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding Raymond 

Weeks and his efforts in the establishment of Veterans Day. 

Whereas November 11, 2012, is the 65th anniversary of National Veterans Day in Birmingham, Alabama; 

Whereas the National Veterans Day in Birmingham is the 

longest running celebration of Veterans Day in the Nation; 

Whereas, on November 11, 1946, World War II veteran Raymond Weeks presented General Eisenhower a program 

design proposing to replace Armistice Day with a National Veterans Day in 1947; 

Whereas the very first Veterans Day celebration was held in 

Birmingham by the National Veterans Day Organization 

in 1947; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•SRES 591 ATS 

Whereas President Eisenhower signed into law on June 1, 

1954, the Act proclaiming November 11 as Veterans Day 

(Public Law 380; 83rd Congress); 

Whereas in 1954, the National Veterans Day Volunteer Organization, started by Raymond Weeks, expanded to organize a multi-day celebration including, but not limited 

to, a Veterans Day Parade, a World Peace Luncheon, 

and presentation during the National Veterans Award 

Dinner of the National Veterans Award; 

Whereas these three events have been held every year since 

1954; 

Whereas the briefing for President Reagan by Elizabeth Dole 

for the Presidential Citizens Medals cited Raymond 

Weeks as the ‘‘Father of Veterans Day’’; 

Whereas President Reagan recognized Raymond Weeks as 

the driving force behind Veterans Day while presenting 

Raymond Weeks with the Presidential Citizens Medal on 

November 11, 1982; 

Whereas Raymond Weeks should be recognized for his push 

to honor the great men and women who have served their 

country with a special day of recognition; and 

Whereas Birmingham, Alabama, should be recognized for its 

contributions to the institution of Veterans Day: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes Birmingham, Alabama, as the 

3 home to the first and longest running celebration of 

4 Veterans Day; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with 
3 

•SRES 591 ATS 

1 (2) recognizes Raymond Weeks for his pio2 neering efforts in the establishment of Veterans 

3 Day; and 

4 (3) honors the sacrifices of, and pays tribute to, 

5 the men and women of the United States in uniform 

6 who risk life and limb for their country at home and 

7 overseas. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with
IN RE William James BERRY Sr., Petitioner

No. 19-7491

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
Hi-Shear Technology Corporation for the year ended May 31, 2008, I, George W.
Trahan, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Hi-Shear Technology
Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that:

         (1) such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended May 31, 2008,
         fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
         the year ended May 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects,
         the financial condition and results of operations of Hi-Shear
         Technology Corporation.


                                      /s/ George W. Trahan
                           -----------------------------------------------
                           George W. Trahan
                           President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman

August 29, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Hi-Shear Technology Corporation
and will be retained by Hi-Shear Technology Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Ronald JONES, petitioner, v. Steven JOHNSON, Administrator, New Jersey State Prison, et al.

No. 18-5932.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 27, 2017

s0619

Order 

Clerk

June 27, 2017

153505

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153505

COA: 330907

Oakland CC: 2010-232531-FC

EDDIE BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

By order of January 31, 2017, the defendant’s former appellate counsel was 

directed to file a supplemental brief. By order of February 17, 2017, the Chief Justice 

appointed substitute appellate counsel to file a second supplemental brief. On order of 

the Court, the briefs having been received, the application for leave to appeal the 

February 24, 2016 order of the Court of Appeals is again considered. Pursuant to MCR 

7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Oakland 

Circuit Court for reissuance of the defendant’s judgment of conviction and sentence. It is 

unclear from the record whether the failure to perfect an appeal of right was solely the 

fault of the defendant’s trial counsel, who promised in open court to file the necessary 

paperwork to begin the appellate process, but failed to fulfill that promise, see Roe v 

Flores-Ortega, 528 US 470, 477; 120 S Ct 1029; 145 L Ed 2d 985 (2000); Peguero v 

United States, 526 US 23, 28; 119 S Ct 961; 143 L Ed 2d 18 (1999), or whether trial 

counsel filed the paperwork and the trial court failed to process it. Regardless, it is clear 

that the failure to perfect an appeal of right is not attributable to the defendant. 

We further ORDER the Oakland Circuit Court, in accordance with Administrative 

Order 2003-03, to determine whether the defendant is indigent and, if so, to appoint 

counsel to represent the defendant in the Court of Appeals.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
Michael HOLMES, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6296.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Joseph A. WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7071.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Ramiro Rubi IBARRA, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-6062.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
SUNG HO PARK, Petitioner v. Tammy FOSS, Warden.

No. 18-9728

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 15

Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 1-16 Filed 09/27/23 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 228
Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 1-16 Filed 09/27/23 Page 2 of 14 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 1-16 Filed 09/27/23 Page 3 of 14 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 1-16 Filed 09/27/23 Page 4 of 14 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 1-16 Filed 09/27/23 Page 5 of 14 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 1-16 Filed 09/27/23 Page 6 of 14 PageID #: 
Page 6 

a plurality of cache memory blocks; 

A plurality of cache memory blocks exists in the L3 cache shared by all ARM cores in a 

partitioned into groups of 4 cache ways (blocks). 

Arm® DynamIQTM Shared Unit, Revision r3p0, Technical Reference Manua

Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 1-16 Filed 09/27/23 Page 7 of 14 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 1-16 Filed 09/27/23 Page 8 of 14 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 1-16 Filed 09/27/23 Page 9 of 14 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 1-16 Filed 09/27/23 Page 10 of 14 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 1-16 Filed 09/27/23 Page 11 of 14 PageID #: 
Page 11 

Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 1-16 Filed 09/27/23 Page 12 of 14 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 1-16 Filed 09/27/23 Page 13 of 14 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 1-16 Filed 09/27/23 Page 14 of 14 PageID #:
# C_2017214EN.01000801.xml

| 4.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 214/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 214/8

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2017/C 214/06)

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Tube and pipe fittings of iron or steel | Republic of Korea
  Malaysia | Anti-dumping duty | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1283/2014 of 2 December 2014 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain tube and pipe fittings of iron or steel originating in the Republic of Korea and Malaysia following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (OJ L 347, 3.12.2014, p. 17) | 29.1.2018 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Tube and pipe fittings of iron or steel

Republic of Korea

Malaysia

Anti-dumping duty

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1283/2014 of 2 December 2014 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain tube and pipe fittings of iron or steel originating in the Republic of Korea and Malaysia following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (OJ L 347, 3.12.2014, p. 17)

29.1.2018

---

(1)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

1

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
Paul V. CANNON, Petitioner v. BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, et al.

No. 19-82

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
exv10w19






Exhibit 10.19




Tennessee Valley Authority

Coal Supply & Origination

1101 Market Street, MR 2A

Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402-2801




CONTRACT SUPPLEMENT



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 

	TO:

	 	Armstrong Coal Company, Inc.
	 	Supplement No.
	 	12	 
	 

	 	7701 Forsyth Boulevard - 10th Floor
	 	Date
	 	November 28, 2011

	 

	 	St. Louis, Missouri 63105
	 	Group-Contract No.
	 	612-40668	 
	 

	 	 	 	Plant
	 	Kingston






Attention: Mr. Martin Wilson



This confirms the November 27, 2011 agreement reached between Eddie Spicer of TVA and Mickey
Fitzhugh of Armstrong Coal Company.



Train W460 was loaded on November 22, 2011, under Traffic Control Number 196216 with coal which
reflected a total moisture content of 12.43 percent compared with the REJECT SPECIFICATION,
contained in Section 9.0 of the Contract, of 12.00 percent for that component of the analysis. As
agreed, TVA will accept this trainload of coal in consideration of a $0.50 per ton reduction in
price. Also, the analysis results obtained on this shipment will be included in the quarterly
quality adjustment calculations required under Section 8.0, Adjustment for Quality. TVA’s
Accounts Payable organization will deduct $5,533.05 from Contractor’s account.



All other terms and conditions of the contract remain unchanged.



Please complete the acceptance below and return the copy of this contract supplement to this
office. You should retain the original for your file.



In the event Contractor fails to execute this Supplement in the acceptance space provided below or
fails to return such executed Supplement to TVA, shipment of coal to TVA following the date of
Contractor’s receipt of this Supplement shall constitute an acceptance by Contractor of all the
terms and conditions of this Supplement, unless within five (5) business days of the date of
receipt of this Supplement, Contractor notifies TVA, both orally and in writing that this
Supplement is not accepted.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 

	Accepted
	 	Armstrong Coal Co.	 	Tennessee Valley Authority	 	 
	 

	 	 

(Company)
	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By
	 	/s/ Martin D. Wilson	 	By 	/s/ Connie S. Gazaway	 	 
	 

	 	 

	 	 	 

Connie S. Gazaway
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	Asset Management Specialist	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Title
	 	President	 	 	/s/	 	 
	 

	 	 

	 	 	 

Manager, Coal Acquisition
	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Date
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 

	 	 	 	 	 






TVA RESTRICTED INFORMATION
William Sandlin MCLAURINE, II, Petitioner, v. Elizabeth C. BERN, et al.

No. 19M32

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Sheila Annette CUNNINGHAM, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA CREDIT UNION.

No. 19-6943

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Abel Acosta,Clerk Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas P.0.3ox**12308~Capital** Station Austin?Texas 78711



### RE: Ex Parte Brandon Trevelle Caines Style No. 1274701-A ; 1274700-A Orit No.**81~134-02** ; 81,134-03

Dear Abel Acosta,Clerk Greetings! 1 am writting your department concerning the above cause No. ·s :1. in said btyle ot Actions. 1 recieved a order trom the 183rd District C'..ourt filed on the Hlth ot March 2015?notifying me that the HUrd District Court was issued thirty (30) days to transpire the record to the Court ot Crimim::.l Appeals. 1 then recieved notices trom the·Court ot Criminal**Appeals~dated** April 10,2015 7 that the supplemental Clerks records,had been recieved and presented to the Court.However,as patt ot my ot?:te VJrit 1 raised;inettective · ---·----Assistance- ot <::ourisel-**c:l::a~bhs>wi11ch·** ·the.·state**'~issued· an~**  order tor- rny counsel to

- respond to the claims .My ·<totinhsali. failed to respond to the, clairas .My counsel failed to respond,and my State vJrit \vas sitting in the**1~3rd** District Court :,:·:_ since 2013**~I** then subnit ted a Mandamus to the Court ot Crirainal Appeals which said Court**order·~!iihe** 183rd District Court to transpire the records to their
court.1 recieved the notice trom the t:ourt ot Crirnj_na1 Appeals,ot**Te;~as,** j_:J[(•:.:·;I intorrning me that your Court recieved my**~etition.1** 

### am now \vritting concerning the tact that i sEll have not personally recieved an Attidavit trom my :.·::·:: ;;: Defense Counsel.Theretore 1 haven't recieved a copy ot the Affidavit and i wanted to know it**~-t** was attached to my 

### 11 ;07 Hrit that vms presented to the Court ot**Crim:~na.1** Appeals.

## RIECf~VfD 

## IN

.

COURTOF CRIMINAL

### APPEALS


## MAY 112015

- AbeJAcosta, Clerk**Than~<** You, ;:)randon T. Caines1n747672 Connally Unit gyy Fr.1. 63L :<enedy,Tx. 78119