alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Human Genome Research Institute Special Emphasis Panel; Nucleic Acid Sequencing Technologies.                    

*Date:*                         June 1, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Suite 300, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Keith McKenney, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Suite 300, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-1580,                         *mckenneyk@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 6, 2022.

Melanie J. Pantoja,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-10123 Filed 5-10-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6537

RONALD JERRY SAWYER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

EDWIN MURRAY; R. A. YOUNG; LARRY HUFFMAN;

K. L. OSBORNE, Warden; G. D. JOHNSON; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER RUSSELL; BOB STAMPER, Sergeant;

LONNIE SAUNDERS; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER

HUMPHRIES; V. V. GRANT; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER

WARNER; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MINTER; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER WAGNER; LIEUTENANT DOSS;

JOHNNIE RUSSELL, Hearings Officer; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SHEFFY; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER

CREGGAR; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BLEVINS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District

Judge. (CA-94-389-R)

Submitted: August 15, 1996 Decided: August 21, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Ronald Jerry Sawyer, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Sawyer v. Murray, No. CA-94-389-R (W.D. Va. Mar. 7, 1996).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                            <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999             JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999             MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999             JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,668,063                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,105,088                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    801,246                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,667,835                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 109,973                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,351,212                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,041,022                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        18,913                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,531,302                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,351,212                       0
<SALES>                                      4,213,276               2,377,489
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,213,276               2,377,489
<CGS>                                        2,841,244               1,598,119
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               930,905                 497,471
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (59,428)                (28,502)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                441,127                 281,899
<INCOME-TAX>                                   156,851                  99,879
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            284,276                 182,020
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   284,276                 182,020
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .13                     .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13                     .12



</TABLE>
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 48 

Congratulating the Green Bay Packers on winning Super Bowl XLV. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 10, 2011 

Mr. KOHL (for himself and Mr. JOHNSON of Wisconsin) submitted the 

following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the Green Bay Packers on winning Super 

Bowl XLV. 

Whereas on Sunday, February 6, 2011, the Green Bay Packers defeated the Pittsburgh Steelers with a score of 31 

to 25 in Super Bowl XLV, in Arlington, Texas; 

Whereas the victory marks the thirteenth championship win 

for the Green Bay Packers, the most of any team in the 

history of the National Football League, and the fourth 

Super Bowl win for the Green Bay Packers; 

Whereas the victory brings the Vince Lombardi Trophy, 

which was named after the legendary Green Bay Packers 

coach, back to Green Bay, Wisconsin, also known as 

‘‘Titletown, U.S.A.’’; 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 48 ATS 

Whereas the Green Bay Packers are publicly owned by diehard fans of the team, making the team unique in professional sports; 

Whereas the Green Bay Packers are known all over the world 

for their devoted fans, as demonstrated by the nearly 300 

consecutive sellout games at Lambeau Field, the home 

field of the Green Bay Packers, and a season ticket waiting list that contains more than 80,000 names; 

Whereas the Green Bay Packers never trailed an opponent by 

more than 7 points during the entire 2010–2011 season; 

Whereas the Green Bay Packers overcame injuries to multiple players to secure a berth in the playoffs on the final 

day of the regular season, following must-win games in 

the final 2 weeks of the season against the New York Giants and the Chicago Bears; 

Whereas the Green Bay Packers defeated the top 3 seeded 

teams in the National Football Conference to advance to 

the Super Bowl and became only the second 6th-seed to 

win the Super Bowl; 

Whereas the Green Bay Packers won the Super Bowl due to 

contributions from an excellent offense, led by Super 

Bowl Most Valuable Player Aaron Rodgers’ 304-yard, 3- 

touchdown performance, and a superb defense that forced 

3 turnovers, including Nick Collins’ 37-yard interception 

return for a touchdown; and 

Whereas Head Coach Mike McCarthy, General Manager Ted 

Thompson, and President Mark Murphy compiled a team 

that exemplified the hard work, discipline, determination, 

and humility of Green Bay, Wisconsin, the home city of 

the Green Bay Packers: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 48 ATS 

1 (1) congratulates the Green Bay Packers on 

2 winning Super Bowl XLV; and 

3 (2) respectfully requests the Secretary of the 

4 Senate to transmit an enrolled copy of this resolu5 tion to— 

6 (A) the Head Coach of the Green Bay 

7 Packers, Mike McCarthy; 

8 (B) the General Manager of the Green Bay 

9 Packers, Ted Thompson; and 

10 (C) the President of the Green Bay Pack11 ers, Mark Murphy. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
Omar WEISE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7845.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 15b



                     Independent Accountants' Review Report


To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
Horizon Group, Inc.


We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated condensed balance sheet of
Horizon Group, Inc. (the Company) as of June 30, 1997, and the related
consolidated condensed statements of operations and cash flows for the
three-month and six-month periods then ended.  These financial statements are
the responsibility of the Company's management.  We did not make a similar
review of the consolidated condensed statements of operations and cash flows for
the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 1996.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial
data, and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters.  It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, which will be performed
for the full year with the objective of expressing an opinion regarding the
financial statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such an
opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements at June
30, 1997, and for the three-month and six-month periods then ended for them to
be in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of December 31,
1996, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders'
equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein) and in
our report dated February 26, 1997, we expressed an unqualified opinion on
those consolidated financial statements.  In our opinion, the information set
forth in the accompanying consolidated condensed balance sheet as of December
31, 1996, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the
consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.


Ernst & Young LLP
Chicago, Illinois
August 13, 1997
Claim Evidence

1.A method

comprising:

Defendant makes and uses ymbology (i.e., a QR code), associated with the website of Macy’s. 

Source: Image of Defendant provided QR Code.

Infringement Claim Chart for U.S. Pat. No. US8651369B2 Vs Macy’s (“Defendant”)

Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 1-5 Filed 12/08/23 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 77
Source: Screenshots taken from portable electronic device, hereinafter a “Smartphone”.

QR Code Scan Decode Action

Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 1-5 Filed 12/08/23 Page 2 of 8 PageID #: 78
a)capturing

a digital

image using

a digital

image

capturing

device that

is part of a

portable

electronic

device;

Defendant uses, or induces the use of,a camera (digital image capturing device) on a Smartphone that captures the 

digital image.

Source: Screenshot taken from Smartphone.

Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 1-5 Filed 12/08/23 Page 3 of 8 PageID #: 79
b) detecting

symbology

associated

with the

digital

image using

a portable

electronic

device;

Defendant uses, or induces the use of, a Smartphone to detect symbology (i.e., QR code) associated with the 

website of Macy’s.

Source: Screenshot taken from Smartphone.

Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 1-5 Filed 12/08/23 Page 4 of 8 PageID #: 80
c) decoding

the

symbology

to obtain a

decode

string using

one or more

visual

detection

applications

residing on

the portable

electronic

device;

Defendant decodes, or induces the decoding of, the QR code pattern to obtain a decode string (i.e., hyperlink) using 

the camera application residing in the Smartphone. 

Source: Screenshot taken from Smartphone.

Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 1-5 Filed 12/08/23 Page 5 of 8 PageID #: 81
d) sending

the decode

string to a

remote

server for

processing;

Defendant sends, or induces the sending of, the decoded string to a remote server for processing. Specifically, the 

Smartphone sends the information associated with the QR code to the Macy’s server.

Source: Screenshot taken from Smartphone.

Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 1-5 Filed 12/08/23 Page 6 of 8 PageID #: 82
e) receiving

information

about the

digital

image from

the remote

server

wherein the

information

is based on

the decode

string;

After the Defendant, or one induced by the Defendant, clicks on the hyperlink that is obtained by scanning the QR 

code associated with the Macy’s website, the Smartphone receives the information and navigates directly to the 

website of Macy’s.

Source: Screenshot taken from Smartphone.

Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 1-5 Filed 12/08/23 Page 7 of 8 PageID #: 83
f) displaying

the

information

on a display

device

associated

with the

electronic

device.

Defendant sends, or induces the sending of, the decoded string to a remote server (in this case, a Macy’s server) for 

processing.The information is received and it is displayed on the display associated with the Smartphone as shown 

below.

Source: Screenshot taken from Smartphone.

Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 1-5 Filed 12/08/23 Page 8 of 8 PageID #: 84
John AFRIYIE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7259

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 05/15/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       59,111
COMMITMENTS
   7,480    2,538        0   47,384   54,326   54,864   56,864    4,247    2,247

CHANGES FROM 05/08/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -466)
  -1,975     -604     -180    2,584      949      429      165     -895     -631

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    12.7      4.3      0.0     80.2     91.9     92.8     96.2      7.2      3.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       62)
       8        3        0       30       33       38       36
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 05/15/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       91,768
COMMITMENTS
  14,166    6,021      608   67,137   80,180   81,911   86,809    9,857    4,959

CHANGES FROM 05/08/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      6,403)
  -2,218    2,245      277    9,242    3,172    7,301    5,694     -898      709

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    15.4      6.6      0.7     73.2     87.4     89.3     94.6     10.7      5.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       91)
      22       10        4       37       37       60       50
```

----

Updated May 21, 2012
Roderick McKISSICK, petitioner, v. Nathan DEAL, Governor of Georgia, et al.

No. 17-9491.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 5, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 24, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-41121 Summary Calendar

JOHNNY MARQUEZ DE LA PLATA, II, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus TIMOTHY J. REVELL, Physician; M. AMIR, Physician; DANIEL GIDEON, Physician; MICHAEL KELLY, MD, Director of Preventive Medicine; JEAN LOUIS, Doctor; CLARENCE MOSELY, Senior Warden; FRANKIE RESCANO, Assistant Warden; ROCHELLE MCKINNEY, RN/Medical Assistant; UNIDENTIFIED PARTY, Stiles Unit Dietician; LYNN ALLEN, Grievance Supervisor, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:01-CV-538-HC-WCR

-------------------- Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Johnny Marquez De La Plata, II, appeals the summary judgment in favor of the defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. In his complaint, De La Plata alleged that he received delayed or inadequate treatment for his hepatitis C.No. 04-41121 -2- De La Plata has failed to show a genuine issue for trial with regard to his claim that the defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. See Farmer v. Brennan , 511 U.S. 825, 847 (1994). The summary-judgment evidence showed that De La Plata received medical care for his hepatitis C and any delay in being tested for hepatitis C and/or receiving treatment for his condition could be no more than negligence, which would not rise to the level of a constitutional violation.
See Varnado v. Lynaugh , 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991). His disagreement with his medical treatment also does not establish a constitutional violation. Id. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 46 

Requiring that legislation considered by the Senate to be confined to a 

single issue. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2011 

Mr. ENZI (for himself and Mr. BARRASSO) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Requiring that legislation considered by the Senate to be 

confined to a single issue. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. SINGLE-ISSUE REQUIREMENT. 

3 (a) POINT OF ORDER.—It shall not be in order in 

4 the Senate to consider a bill or resolution that is not con5 fined to a single subject. 

6 (b) SUPERMAJORITY WAIVER AND APPEALS.— 

7 (1) WAIVER.—This section may be waived or 

8 suspended in the Senate only by the affirmative vote 

9 of two-thirds of the Members, duly chosen and 

10 sworn. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 46 IS 

1 (2) APPEALS.—Appeals in the Senate from the 

2 decisions of the Chair relating to any provision of 

3 this section shall be limited to 30 minutes, to be 

4 equally divided between, and controlled by, the ap5 pellant and the manager of the bill or joint resolu6 tion. An affirmative vote of two-thirds of the Mem7 bers of the Senate, duly chosen and sworn, shall be 

8 required to sustain an appeal of the ruling of the 

9 Chair on a point of order raised under this section. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
Valerie ARROYO, Petitioner v. Joseph COLBERT, Jr., et al.

No. 18-9040

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 Eastern District of Texas COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC T-MOBILE USA, INC. 2:23-cv-00381-JRG-RSP COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC 09/06/2023 /s/ Neil A. Rubin Neil A. Rubin SBN 250761

RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT 

12424 Wilshire Blvd, 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90025

nrubin@raklaw.com (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00381-JRG-RSP Document 10 Filed 09/06/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 69
Jody GIFFORD, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 19-7418.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District denied.