32184 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 103 / Friday, May 27, 2022 / Notices 

Meridian, Idaho, was accepted January 

13, 2022. 

The plat, in 3 sheets, incorporating 

the field notes of the corrective 

dependent resurvey of portions of the 

east boundary and subdivisional lines, 

and the dependent resurvey of portions 

of the 1875 south boundary, 

subdivisional lines and subdivision of 

sections 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 32, 33, 34, 

and 35, and the survey of tracts 37 

through 41, Township 5 South, Range 

35 East, Boise Meridian, Idaho, was 

accepted February 28, 2022. 

The plat, in one sheet, incorporating 

the field notes of the corrective 

dependent resurvey of portions of the 

1892 south boundary, and the 

dependent resurvey of a portion of the 

1892 south boundary, and the survey of 

tracts 37 through 40, Township 5 1/2 

South, Range 35 East, Boise Meridian, 

Idaho, was accepted February 28, 2022. 

The plat, in two sheets, incorporating 

the field notes of the dependent 

resurvey of portions of the south 

boundary, east boundary, subdivisional 

lines and subdivision of sections 25, 26 

and 35, Township 8 South, Range 40 

East, Boise Meridian, Idaho, was 

accepted March 21, 2022. 

The plat, in two sheets, incorporating 

the field notes of the dependent 

resurvey of portions of the east 

boundary, subdivisional lines and the 

1892 meanders of the Clearwater River 

in section 28, and subdivision of 

sections 25 and 28, Township 37 North, 

Range 2 West, Boise Meridian, Idaho, 

was accepted March 29, 2022. 

The plat, in three sheets, 

incorporating the field notes of the 

dependent resurvey of portions of the 

subdivisional lines, the 1915 segregation 

survey of the Big Four Lode Mining 

Claim, the original 1897 meanders of the 

Clearwater River in sections 17 and 28, 

and subdivision of sections 8, 14, 17, 

and 28, Township 34 North, Range 3 

East, Boise Meridian, Idaho, was 

accepted May 17, 2022. 

A person or party who wishes to 

protest one or more plats of survey 

identified above must file a written 

notice of protest with the Chief 

Cadastral Surveyor for Idaho, Bureau of 

Land Management within 30 calendar 

days from the date of this publication at 

the address listed in the ADDRESSES

section of this notice. The protest must 

identify the plat(s) of survey that the 

person or party wishes to protest and 

contain all reasons and evidence in 

support of the protest. The protest must 

be filed before the scheduled date of 

official filing for the plat(s) of survey 

being protested. Any protest filed after 

the scheduled date of official filing will 

be untimely and will not be considered. 

A protest is considered filed on the date 

it is received by the Chief Cadastral 

Surveyor for Idaho during regular 

business hours; if received after regular 

business hours, a protest will be 

considered filed the next business day. 

If a protest against a plat of survey is 

received prior to the scheduled date of 

official filing, the official filing of the 

plat of survey identified in the protest 

will be stayed pending consideration of 

the protest. A plat of survey will not be 

officially filed until the next business 

day following dismissal or resolution of 

all protests of the plat. 

Before including your address, phone 

number, email address, or other 

personal identifying information in a 

protest, you should be aware that the 

documents you submit, including your 

personal identifying information, may 

be made publicly available in their 

entirety at any time. While you can ask 

us to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

(Authority: 43 U.S.C., chapter 3) 

Timothy A. Quincy, 

Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Idaho. 

[FR Doc. 2022–11449 Filed 5–26–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–GG–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1222] 

Certain Video Processing Devices, 

Components Thereof, and Digital 

Smart Televisions Containing the 

Same; Commission Determination Not 

To Review an Initial Determination 

Terminating the Investigation Due to 

Settlement and Setting a Schedule for 

Briefing an Order Concerning 

Sanctions; Termination of 

Investigation 

AGENCY: International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) has 

determined not to review an initial 

determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 76) 

issued by the presiding administrative 

law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) terminating the 

investigation due to a settlement 

agreement. The Commission has also set 

a briefing schedule in connection with 

Order No. 75 denying a motion for 

sanctions. This investigation is hereby 

terminated. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl 

P. Bretscher, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–2382. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket system 

(‘‘EDIS’’) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For 

help accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal, telephone 

(202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on October 19, 2020, based on a 

complaint, as supplemented, filed by 

DivX, LLC (‘‘DivX’’) of San Diego, 

California. 85 FR 66355 (Oct. 19, 2020). 

The complaint alleges a violation of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, from the 

importation, sale for importation, or sale 

in the United States after importation of 

certain video processing devices, 

components thereof, and digital smart 

televisions containing the same by 

reason of infringement of one or more 

asserted claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 

8,832,297; 10,212,486; 10,412,141; and 

10,484,749. Id. The complaint further 

alleges the existence of a domestic 

industry. Id. 

The Commission’s notice of 

investigation names the following 

respondents: Samsung Electronics Co., 

Ltd. of Gyeonggi-do, Korea; Samsung 

Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield 

Park, New Jersey; Samsung Electronics 

HCMC CE Complex Co., Ltd. of Ho Chi 

Minh City, Vietnam (collectively, 

‘‘Samsung’’); LG Electronics Inc. of 

Seoul, Korea; LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. 

of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 

(collectively ‘‘LG’’); MediaTek, Inc. of 

Hsinchu City, Taiwan; MediaTek USA 

Inc. of San Jose, California; MStar 

Semiconductor, Inc. of Hsinchu Hsien, 

Taiwan (collectively, ‘‘MediaTek’’); 

Realtek Semiconductor Corp. of 

Hsinchu, Taiwan (‘‘Realtek’’); TCL 

Corporation of Huizhou, Guangdong, 

China; TCL Technology Corporation of 

Huizhoug, Guangdong, China; TCL 

Electronics Holdings Ltd. of Shenzhen, 

Guangdong, China; TTE Technology, 

Inc. of Corona, California; Shenzhen 

TCL New Technologies Co. of 

Shenzhen, Guangdong, China; TCL King 

Electrical Appliances (Huizhou) Co. Ltd. 

of Huizhou, Guangdong, China; TCL 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 103 / Friday, May 27, 2022 / Notices 32185 

MOKA International Ltd. of Sha Tin, 

New Territories, Hong Kong; and TCL 

Smart Device (Vietnam) Co., Ltd. of Bac 

Tan Uyen District, Binh Duong 

Province, Vietnam (collectively, ‘‘TCL’’). 

Id. at 66356. The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations was not named as a party 

to this investigation. Id. 

The Commission has partially 

terminated the investigation with 

respect to certain patents and patent 

claims. Order No. 25 (Jan. 15, 2021), 

unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Feb. 1, 

2021); Order No. 34 (Feb. 19, 2021), 

unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (March 

15, 2021); Order No. 49 (April 21, 2021), 

unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (May 10, 

2021); Order No. 65 (June 28, 2021), 

unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (July 28, 

2021). 

The Commission has also partially 

terminated the investigation with 

respect to certain respondents due to 

settlement agreements. See Order No. 37 

(terminating MediaTek), unreviewed by 

Comm’n Notice (March 12, 2021); Order 

No. 67 (July 16, 2021) (terminating 

RealTek), unreviewed by Comm’n 

Notice (Aug. 4, 2021); Order No. 69 

(Aug. 12, 2021) (terminating LG, 

Samsung), unreviewed by Comm’n 

Notice (Sept. 15, 2021). 

On April 19, 2022, DivX and TCL 

jointly moved to terminate the 

investigation based on a settlement 

agreement that resolves the dispute 

between the parties. 

On April 22, 2022, the presiding ALJ 

issued the subject ID (Order No. 76) 

granting the joint motion to terminate 

the investigation based on the 

settlement agreement. The ID finds that, 

pursuant to Commission Rules 

210.21(a)(1), (b)(1) (19 CFR 210.21(a)(1), 

(b)(1)), DivX and TCL have represented 

that there are no other agreements, 

express or implied, oral or written, 

between them regarding the subject 

matter of this investigation. The ID 

further finds that termination is proper 

because it would not be contrary to the 

public health and welfare, competitive 

conditions in the U.S. economy, the 

production of like or directly 

competitive conditions in the United 

States, or U.S. consumers. The ID 

further finds that termination is in the 

public interest, and it will conserve 

public and private resources. 

No party filed a petition for review of 

the subject ID. 

On October 4, 2021, former 

respondent RealTek filed a motion for 

sanctions against DivX, pursuant to 

Commission Rules 210.4 and 210.25 (19 

CFR 210.4, 210.25), for alleged 

misrepresentations and misconduct 

during the investigation. DivX filed its 

opposition to RealTek’s motion on 

October 14, 2021. 

On April 22, 2022, the presiding ALJ 

issued Order No. 75, denying RealTek’s 

motion for sanctions. Order No. 75 

(April 22, 2022). 

The Commission has determined not 

to review Order No. 76. This 

investigation is hereby terminated. 

The Commission has set the following 

schedule in connection with Order No. 

75. Any petition for review of Order No. 

75 must be filed by June 1, 2022. 

Responses to a petition for review, if 

any, must be filed by June 8, 2022. 

The Commission voted to approve 

this determination on May 24, 2022. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determinations is contained in Section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: May 24, 2022. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2022–11460 Filed 5–26–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Receipt of Complaint; 

Solicitation of Comments Relating to 

the Public Interest 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has received a complaint 

entitled Certain Barcode Scanners, Scan 

Engines, Mobile Computers with 

Barcode Scanning Functionalities, 

Products Containing the Same, and 

Components Thereof II, DN 3623; the 

Commission is soliciting comments on 

any public interest issues raised by the 

complaint or complainant’s filing 

pursuant to the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa 

R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 

20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. The 

public version of the complaint can be 

accessed on the Commission’s 

Electronic Document Information 

System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 

For help accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server at United 

States International Trade Commission 

(USITC) at https://www.usitc.gov. The 

public record for this investigation may 

be viewed on the Commission’s 

Electronic Document Information 

System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission has received a complaint 

and a submission pursuant to § 210.8(b) 

of the Commission’s Rules of Practice 

and Procedure filed on behalf of 

Honeywell International Inc. and Hand 

Held Products, Inc. on May 23, 2022. 

The complaint alleges violations of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 

U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

and the sale within the United States 

after importation of certain barcode 

scanners, scan engines, mobile 

computers with barcode scanning 

functionalities, products containing the 

same, and components thereof II. The 

complainant names as respondents: 

Zebra Technologies Corporation of 

Lincolnshire, IL; and Symbol 

Technologies, Inc. of Holtsville. The 

complainant requests that the 

Commission issue a limited exclusion 

order, cease and desist orders, and 

impose a bond upon respondents 

alleged infringing articles during the 60- 

day Presidential review period pursuant 

to 19 U.S.C. 1337(j). 

Proposed respondent, other interested 

parties, and members of the public are 

invited to file comments on any public 

interest issues raised by the complaint 

or § 210.8(b) filing. Comments should 

address whether issuance of the relief 

specifically requested by the 

complainant in this investigation would 

affect the public health and welfare in 

the United States, competitive 

conditions in the United States 

economy, the production of like or 

directly competitive articles in the 

United States, or United States 

consumers. 

In particular, the Commission is 

interested in comments that: 

(i) Explain how the articles 

potentially subject to the requested 

remedial orders are used in the United 

States; 

(ii) identify any public health, safety, 

or welfare concerns in the United States 

relating to the requested remedial 

orders; 

(iii) identify like or directly 

competitive articles that complainant, 

its licensees, or third parties make in the 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1