alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 6016** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. ANTONIO DEMONTA HARVEY , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the East ern District of North Carolina , at Greenville
. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. ( 4:03

- cr - 00088

- H

- 4; 4:08

- cv - 00117

- H )

Submitted : March 15, 2011 Decided: March 21, 2011

Before MOTZ and WYNN , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judg e.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Antonio Demonta Harvey, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May

- Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circui t.2 PER CURIAM: Antonio Demonta Harvey seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2010 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies th is standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 4 84

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Harvey has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Harvey’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the fact s and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 452 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 452

 Designating July 13, 2012, as ``Collector Car Appreciation Day'' and 
recognizing that the collection and restoration of historic and classic 
cars is an important part of preserving the technological achievements 
              and cultural heritage of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 9, 2012

     Mr. Tester (for himself and Mr. Burr) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating July 13, 2012, as ``Collector Car Appreciation Day'' and 
recognizing that the collection and restoration of historic and classic 
cars is an important part of preserving the technological achievements 
              and cultural heritage of the United States.

Whereas many people in the United States maintain classic automobiles as a 
        pastime and do so with great passion and as a means of individual 
        expression;
Whereas the Senate recognizes the effect that the more than 100-year history of 
        the automobile has had on the economic progress of the United States and 
        supports wholeheartedly all activities involved in the restoration and 
        exhibition of classic automobiles;
Whereas the collection, restoration, and preservation of automobiles is an 
        activity shared across generations and across all segments of society;
Whereas thousands of local car clubs and related businesses have been 
        instrumental in preserving a historic part of the heritage of the United 
        States by encouraging the restoration and exhibition of such vintage 
        works of art;
Whereas automotive restoration provides well-paying, high-skilled jobs for 
        people in all 50 States; and
Whereas automobiles have provided the inspiration for music, photography, 
        cinema, fashion, and other artistic pursuits that have become part of 
        the popular culture of the United States: Now therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates July 13, 2012, as ``Collector Car 
        Appreciation Day'';
            (2) recognizes that the collection and restoration of 
        historic and classic cars is an important part of preserving 
        the technological achievements and cultural heritage of the 
        United States; and
            (3) encourages the people of the United States to engage in 
        events and commemorations of Collector Car Appreciation Day 
        that create opportunities for collector car owners to educate 
        young people about the importance of preserving the cultural 
        heritage of the United States, including through the collection 
        and restoration of collector cars.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit I

Case 2:24-cv-00021-JRG Document 54-10 Filed 07/18/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 3127
Case 2:24-cv-00021-JRG Document 54-10 Filed 07/18/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 3128
Tyrone JORDAN, Petitioner, v. Charles L. RYAN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 19-5291

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 124 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill, H.R. 5771, 

3 the Clerk of the House shall amend subsection (a) of sec4 tion 1 of Division B (relating to Achieving a Better Life 

5 Experience Act of 2014) to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(a) SHORT TITLE.—This division may be cited as 

7 the ‘Stephen Beck, Jr., Achieving a Better Life Experi-
2 

•HCON 124 EH 

1 ence Act of 2014’ or the ‘Stephen Beck, Jr., ABLE Act 

2 of 2014’.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 10, 

2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 124 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for a correction in the enrollment of H.R. 

5771.
Alonzo VERNON, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5317

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. (the"Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the periodending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, David J. Vogel, President and Director of Citigroup Managed FuturesLLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|           |                                                                                                                     |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and |

|           |                                                                                                                                                        |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Partnership. |

Date: May 16, 2005

/s/ David J.Vogel

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

David J.VogelCitigroup Managed Futures LLC President andDirector

----
Regina WOLGAMOTT, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7631.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Donald E. CRAIG, et al., Petitioners, v. Janet Turner O'KELLEY, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of John Harley Turner, et al.

No. 19-956.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 6, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 4.7

 

CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
 OF
 ALLSTATE FINANCING IX

 

THIS Certificate of Trust of Allstate Financing IX (the “Trust”) is being duly executed and filed on behalf of the Trust by the undersigned, as trustee, to form a statutory trust under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12 Del. C. § 3801 et  seq.) (the “Act”).

 

1.                                       Name.  The name of the statutory trust formed by this Certificate of Trust is Allstate Financing IX.

 

2.                                       Delaware Trustee.  The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust with its principal place of business in the State of Delaware are U.S. Bank Trust National Association, 300 Delaware Avenue, 9th Floor, Wilmington, DE 19801.

 

3.                                       Effective Date.  This Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon filing.

 

[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]

 











 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate of Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a)(1) of the Act.

 

 

	
 
    	
/s/   Mary J. McGinn
    
	
 
    	
Mary   J. McGinn, as Administrative Trustee
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
/s/   Mario Rizzo
    
	
 
    	
Mario   Rizzo, as Administrative Trustee
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
/s/   Steven E. Shebik
    
	
 
    	
Steven   E. Shebik, as Administrative Trustee
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
U.S.   BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
   as Delaware Trustee
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Carolina D. Altomare
    
	
 
    	
Name:   Carolina D. Altomare
    
	
 
    	
Title:   Vice President
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
U.S.   BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as 
   Property Trustee
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Carolina D. Altomare
    
	
 
    	
Name:   Carolina D. Altomare
    
	
 
    	
Title:   Vice President
    


 

2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES,

Plaintiff,

v.

AT&T SERVICES INC.; AT&T MOBILITY 

LLC; and AT&T CORP.,

Defendants,

NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION and 

ERICSSON INC.,

Intervenors.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00202-JRG-RSP

(Lead Case)

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES,

Plaintiff,

v.

VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC., 

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON 

WIRELESS,

Defendants,

NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION and 

ERICSSON INC.,

Intervenors.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00203-JRG-RSP

(Member Case)

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES,

Plaintiff,

v.

T-MOBILE USA, INC.,

Defendant,

NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION and 

ERICSSON INC.,

Intervenors.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00204-JRG-RSP

(Member Case)

Case 2:23-cv-00202-JRG-RSP Document 80 Filed 07/15/24 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 1594
2

NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE

Defendants AT&T Corp., AT&T Mobility LLC, and AT&T Services, Inc., Verizon 

Communications, Inc. and Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, T-Mobile USA, Inc., and 

Intervenors Ericsson Inc. and Nokia of America Corporation hereby notify the Court that they have

complied with the Court’s First Amended Docket Control Order (Dkt. No. 75), by submitting their

technical tutorial to the Court via hand delivery on July 15, 2024. A copy of the technical tutorial 

has been served upon Plaintiff’s counsel via email on July 15, 2024. 

Dated: July 15, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Melissa R. Smith

Melissa R. Smith (TBN 24001351)

GILLAM & SMITH, LLP

303 South Washington Avenue

Marshall, Texas 75670

Telephone: (903) 934-8450

Facsimile: (903) 934-9257

Deron R. Dacus (TBN 00790553) 

ddacus@dacusfirm.com 

THE DACUS FIRM, P.C. 

821 ESE Loop 323, Suite 430 

Tyler, Texas 75701 

Telephone: 903.705.1117 

Matthew S. Yungwirth

msyungwirth@duanemorris.com

Alice E. Snedeker

aesnedeker@duanemorris.com

John R. Gibson

jrgibson@duanemorris.com

DUANE MORRIS LLP

1075 Peachtree Street NE

Suite 1700

Atlanta, Georgia 30309

Telephone: 404.253.6900

Facsimile: 404.253.6901

Case 2:23-cv-00202-JRG-RSP Document 80 Filed 07/15/24 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 1595
3

William A. Liddell

waliddell@duanemorris.com

DUANE MORRIS LLP

2801 Via Fortuna

Suite 200

Austin, Texas 78746-7567

Telephone: (512) 277-2272

Facsimile: (512) 227-2301

Tyler Marandola

tmarandola@duanemorris.com

DUANE MORRIS LLP

30 S. 17th Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103

Telephone: (215) 979-1000

Elissa Sanford

esanford@duanemorris.com

DUANE MORRIS LLP

901 New York Avenue NW

Suite 700 East

Washington, D.C. 20001-4795

Telephone: (202) 776-5231

Counsel for Defendants / Intervenors

Case 2:23-cv-00202-JRG-RSP Document 80 Filed 07/15/24 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 1596
4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that counsel of record who are deemed to have consented 

to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF system 

per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on July 15, 2024.

/s/ Melissa R. Smith

 Melissa R. Smith

Case 2:23-cv-00202-JRG-RSP Document 80 Filed 07/15/24 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 1597
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, Thomas P. Maun, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Micro Component Technology, Inc.:

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterlyreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this quarterly report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officersand I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15) for the registrant and we have:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation.

 

c) disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officersand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

 

 
| Dated: December 15, 2004 | By:                                               | /s/ Thomas P. Maun |   |
|--------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|--------------------|--------|
|                     | Thomas P. Maun                                    |
|                     | Chief Financial Officer  Chief Accounting Officer |

 

----
In the Matter of DISCIPLINE OF Leicester Bryce STOVELL.

No. D-3049.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 5, 2019.

Leicester Bryce Stovell, of Washington, District of Columbia, is suspended from *25the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 478 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 478

   Commemorating the 200th anniversary of the chartering of Hamilton 
                     College in Clinton, New York.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 2012

 Mr. Schumer (for himself, Mrs. Gillibrand, and Mr. Sanders) submitted 
      the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Commemorating the 200th anniversary of the chartering of Hamilton 
                     College in Clinton, New York.

Whereas Hamilton College, located in Clinton, New York, received its charter 
        from the Regents of the University of the State of New York on May 26, 
        1812, ``for the instruction and education of youth, in the learned 
        languages and liberal arts and sciences'';
Whereas Hamilton College was originally founded in 1793 as the Hamilton-Oneida 
        Academy by the Reverend Samuel Kirkland, a missionary to the Oneida 
        Indians;
Whereas all-male Hamilton College joined with all-female Kirkland College in 
        1978 to form one coeducational institution of higher learning dedicated 
        to academic freedom and the unfettered pursuit of truth;
Whereas the distinguished alumni of Hamilton College include recipients of the 
        Nobel Peace Prize, the Presidential Medal of Freedom, and the Pulitzer 
        Prize, and public servants at every level, including a former Vice 
        President of the United States, United States Senators and 
        Representatives, United States district and appellate court judges, 
        members of the Presidential Cabinet, ambassadors, Governors, and State, 
        county, and local officials; and
Whereas Hamilton College is currently comprised of 1,812 students from 49 states 
        and 37 countries, and a faculty dedicated to teaching and the discovery 
        and advancement of new knowledge: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) commemorates the bicentennial of the chartering of 
        Hamilton College in Clinton, New York; and
            (2) honors the outstanding contributions made by the 
        alumni, faculty, and students of Hamilton College during the 
        past 200 years, including service to the United States that has 
        fostered the development of the United States as a diplomatic 
        force and industrial power in the world.
                                 <all>
```
Miah STROUD, Petitioner v. Shawn BREWER, Warden

No. 19-5263

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Amendment No. 1, dated as of March 6, 2012 to the 2000 Stock Option Plan



 Exhibit 10.20(a) 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 DATED AS OF MARCH 6, 2012 
 TO THE INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS AND FRAGRANCES
INC. 
 2000 STOCK OPTION PLAN FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS 

AS AMENDED AND RESTATED AS OF DECEMBER 15, 2004 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of International Flavors and Fragrances Inc. (the “Company”) has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company that
the International Flavors and Fragrances Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, as previously amended and restated as of December 15, 2004 (the “Plan”), be amended to provide for the cashless exercise of vested stock
options; and 
 WHEREAS, the Board has the authority under Section 19 of the Plan to amend the Plan. 

NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to Section 19 thereof, the Plan is hereby amended as set forth below. 

1. Section 5 of the Plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows: 
 Purchase Price: The purchase price per share for any stock option at any time under this Plan shall be the fair market value of a share of IFF Common Stock on the date of grant of the option. Upon
exercise of any stock option the director may pay for the stock covered by the stock option (i) in cash or by personal check or cashiers check, (ii) in shares of IFF Common Stock owned by the director and valued at their fair market value on the
date of exercise, (iii) in shares of IFF Common Stock deliverable to the director upon exercise of the stock option equal to the purchase price, valued at their fair market value on the date of exercise, referred to as the net share settlement
method or (iv) by any such other method (including broker assisted cashless exercise) to the extent permitted by applicable law, (but excluding any exercise method in which a personal loan would be made from the Company to the director) as the Board
may from time to time authorize. 
 2. Effect on Plan. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.

 3. Effective Date. The effective date of this Amendment No. 1 shall be March 6, 2012.
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 01/15/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       55,463
COMMITMENTS
   1,723   13,712    5,475   47,521   35,315   54,719   54,502      744      961

CHANGES FROM 01/08/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,708)
  -1,926    1,087    1,250    4,440    1,204    3,764    3,541      -56      167

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     3.1     24.7      9.9     85.7     63.7     98.7     98.3      1.3      1.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       41)
       4        8        9       23       19       34       30`

---

Updated January 18, 2013
Brennen CLANCY, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.

No. 19-7413.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.