alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: November 21, 2005
    
    By /s/ Diane D. LappDiane D. LappInterim Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                           7,377
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,165
<ALLOWANCES>                                       554
<INVENTORY>                                     45,550
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                78,762
<PP&E>                                          98,468
<DEPRECIATION>                                  58,514
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 123,726
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,371
<BONDS>                                        153,836
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (58,963)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   123,726
<SALES>                                        132,980
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               132,980
<CGS>                                           92,301
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  114,874
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   163
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,982
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,586
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,063)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,649
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,649
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, 

v.

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., 

Defendants. 

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP 

(LEAD CASE)

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Cobblestone Wireless, LLC (“Cobblestone”) Unopposed 

Motions for Extension of Time to Serve Infringement and Invalidity Contentions. (Dkt. Nos. 25.)

The Court, having considered the unopposed motion, and for good cause shown, finds that the 

motion should be GRANTED.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadlines are extended for Cobblestone to comply 

with P.R. 3-1 & 3-2 and serve contentions to Cisco Systems, Inc., Hewlett Packard Enterprise 

Company, and Aruba Networks, LLC (“Defendants”) to December 11, 2023 and the deadline for 

Defendants to comply with P.R. 3-3 & 3-4 to February 26, 2024. 

All other deadlines shall remain in place absent further Order of the Court.

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP Document 26 Filed 12/05/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 95
Glenn W. REBENSTORF, Petitioner, v. Jeffrey GRANT.

No. 19M120.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 6, 2020

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Richard POTTS, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5221

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
# C_2017026EN.01000601.xml

| 26.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/6

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services transporting cargo and mail, in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 26/04)

| Member State | Portugal |
| --- | --- |
| Route | Lisbon-Terceira-Ponta Delgada-Lisbon
  or
  Lisbon-Ponta Delgada-Terceira-Lisbon |
| Period of validity of the contract | 3 years following the start of the operation |
| Deadline for submitting applications | 63 days after the day of publication of the present invitation |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligations can be obtained | All documents are available from:
  http://www.saphety.com
  and
  the National Civil Aviation Authority
  concurso.osp@anac.pt
  For more information, please contact:





  Ministry of Planning and Infrastructure |
| Office of the Secretary of State for Infrastructure |
| Av. Barbosa do Bocage 5, 2nd floor |
| 1049-039 Lisbon |
| PORTUGAL |
| Email gab.infraestruturas@mpi.gov.pt |

Member State

Portugal

Route

Lisbon-Terceira-Ponta Delgada-Lisbon

or

Lisbon-Ponta Delgada-Terceira-Lisbon

Period of validity of the contract

3 years following the start of the operation

Deadline for submitting applications

63 days after the day of publication of the present invitation

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligations can be obtained

All documents are available from:

http://www.saphety.com

and

the National Civil Aviation Authority

concurso.osp@anac.pt

For more information, please contact:

Ministry of Planning and Infrastructure

Office of the Secretary of State for Infrastructure

Av. Barbosa do Bocage 5, 2nd floor

1049-039 Lisbon

PORTUGAL

Email gab.infraestruturas@mpi.gov.pt

---
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/26/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       53,878
COMMITMENTS
   1,767    5,327    1,838   48,782   45,078   52,387   52,243    1,491    1,635

CHANGES FROM 03/19/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,259)
     470     -880      241      829    2,165    1,540    1,526     -281     -267

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     3.3      9.9      3.4     90.5     83.7     97.2     97.0      2.8      3.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       45)
       5        9        7       24       26       34       37`

---

Updated March 29, 2013
Emma SERNA, Petitioner, v. Margette WEBSTER, et al.

No. 19-637.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for rehearing denied.
IN RE Antwoyn SPENCER, Petitioner.

No. 19-7047.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for rehearing denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

ANDREW SUTTON BLITZ, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-50394

D.C. No. 2:17-cr-00112-PA-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 15, 2019**

Before: TROTT, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Andrew Sutton Blitz appeals from the district court’s judgment and 

challenges the 70-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for 

conspiracy, possession of unauthorized devices, aggravated identity theft, and

aiding and abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1029, 1028A, and 2. We 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JAN 17 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-50394

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Blitz contends that the district court erred by imposing a two-level 

sentencing enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 3C1.2 for reckless endangerment during 

flight from law enforcement. Blitz concedes that the high-speed chase constituted 

reckless endangerment, but argues that the district court clearly erred by finding he 

was the driver of the vehicle involved in the chase. The district court’s finding that 

Blitz was the driver was not clearly erroneous because it was supported by a law 

enforcement officer’s identification of Blitz as the man he saw fleeing the scene of 

the chase, the fact that Blitz had access to the vehicle, and Blitz’s co-conspirator’s 

statement. See United States v. Gasca-Ruiz, 852 F.3d 1167, 1170 (9th Cir. 2017) 

(en banc) (district court’s factual findings at sentencing are reviewed for clear 

error); United States v. Spangle, 626 F.3d 488, 497 (9th Cir. 2010) (district court’s 

factual findings are clearly erroneous only if they are “illogical, implausible, or 

without support in the record”). Contrary to Blitz’s argument, the district court did 

not err by relying on the police officer’s identification because other evidence 

corroborated it. See United States v. Ingham, 486 F.3d 1068, 1076 (9th Cir. 2007) 

(district court may rely on hearsay at sentencing as long as it is supported by “some 

minimal indicia of reliability” (internal quotations omitted)).

AFFIRMED.
NO. 07-04-0448 -CR IN THE COU RT OF APP EALS FOR THE SEVENT H DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMA RILLO PANE L D APRIL 12, 2005

______________________________ RONALD H . MAR R, JR., Appellant

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

_________________________________ FROM THE 137 TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY; NO. 2003-403,78 4; HON. CECIL G. PURYEAR, PRESIDING

_______________________________ Before QUINN, REAVIS and CAMP BELL, JJ. Ron ald H. Ma rr, Jr. (ap pella nt)app ealshis convi ction for fai ling to register as a sex offende r. His sole issue involves whether he w as denied due process becaus e he wasnot given the chance to cha llenge whether th e sex c rime f or w hich he w

as conv icte d in Ok l ah oma was su bs ta nt i al l y s i mi l ar to a c ri me r ec og ni ze d i n T ex as . W e a ff i rm. Attria l, ap pella nt test ified tha t “t he w hole thin g of this case was not

challenging that I h ad to re gi st er , i t wa s ju st myunderstanding that I had thought I w as f inish ed” onc e his par ole ended. This is of import because we cannot find wh ere in the record that appellant2

raised bef

ore the t rial court

the due process argum entasserted here. A nd, because the argument

was not raised below, it was waived. See Saldano v. State, 70 S.W.3d 873, 886- 87 (Tex. Crim . App. 2002) (stating that even constitutional com plaints may be w aived by failure to tim ely asse rt them in the trial co urt); Latham v. State , No. 14-01-00562-CR, 2002 Te x. App. LEX IS 6592 (Tex . App.–Housto n [14 th Dist.] Sept. 5, 2002, no pet.) (not designated for publication) (holding that the appellant waived hi s du e pr oce ss claim involving thesex

offend er registra tion stat ute bec ause it w as not raised at trial). Accordingly, we overrule the issue and affirm th e judgm ent of the trial court.
Brian Quinn Justice Do not publish.
Jennifer CARDENAS, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9723

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/21/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       54,819
COMMITMENTS
   1,833    7,049    2,384   50,527   45,199   54,744   54,632       75      187

CHANGES FROM 05/14/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        634)
     -29   -1,112      261      422    1,440      654      589      -20       45

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     3.3     12.9      4.3     92.2     82.5     99.9     99.7      0.1      0.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       43)
       4       10        7       21       25       30       39`

---

Updated May 24, 2013
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/18/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       50,915
COMMITMENTS
   1,859    5,191    3,550   45,310   41,930   50,719   50,671      196      244

CHANGES FROM 06/11/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        398)
     262     -997      -20       96    1,358      338      341       60       57

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     3.7     10.2      7.0     89.0     82.4     99.6     99.5      0.4      0.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       46)
       6        9        9       23       24       36       37`

---

Updated June 21, 2013
Craig K. GARRETT, Petitioner, v. Joseph MADDER, et al.

No. 19-7601.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 07/23/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       38,537
COMMITMENTS
   4,030    7,108      759   22,065   18,546   26,853   26,413   11,684   12,125

CHANGES FROM 07/16/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -148)
     -68      970      -16   -1,683   -1,966   -1,767   -1,012    1,619      864

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    10.5     18.4      2.0     57.3     48.1     69.7     68.5     30.3     31.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       58)
      10       12        7       30       23       43       40
```

----

Updated July 26, 2013
Yassine BAOUCH, et al., Petitioners, v. WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC., dba Werner Trucking, et al.

No. 18-1541

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND
AS OF JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000911317
<NAME> LAS VEGAS AIRLINES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         108,208
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  50,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               50,000
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 718,218
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          370,049
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,817
<OTHER-SE>                                     (344,342)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  136,287
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (136,287)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (136,287)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (136,287)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 83 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 83

       Designating March 2, 2011, as ``Read Across America Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 1, 2011

    Mr. Reed (for himself and Ms. Collins) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Designating March 2, 2011, as ``Read Across America Day''.

Whereas reading is a basic requirement for quality education and professional 
        success, and is a source of pleasure throughout life;
Whereas the people of the United States must be able to read if the United 
        States is to remain competitive in the global economy;
Whereas Congress has placed great emphasis on reading intervention and providing 
        additional resources for reading assistance, including through the 
        programs authorized in the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (20 
        U.S.C. 6301 et seq.) and through annual appropriations for library and 
        literacy programs; and
Whereas more than 50 national organizations concerned about reading and 
        education have joined with the National Education Association to 
        designate March 2, the anniversary of the birth of Theodor Geisel, also 
        known as Dr. Seuss, as a day to celebrate reading: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates March 2, 2011, as ``Read Across America 
        Day'';
            (2) honors Theodor Geisel, also known as Dr. Seuss, for his 
        success in encouraging children to discover the joy of reading;
            (3) honors the 14th anniversary of ``Read Across America 
        Day'';
            (4) encourages parents to read with their children for at 
        least 30 minutes on ``Read Across America Day'' in honor of the 
        commitment of the Senate to building a nation of readers; and
            (5) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        the day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 99.6**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Eldorado Gold Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul N. Wright, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley        Act of 2002, that:

(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)        The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|   | March 31, 2010 | _ /s/ Paul N. Wright |
|--------|----------------|----------------------|

|   | Paul N. Wright |
|--------|----------------|

|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|--------|-------------------------|

|   | (Principal Executive Officer) |
|--------|-------------------------------|

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Eldorado Gold Corporation and will be retained by Eldorado Gold Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Tom S. MOURNING, II, Petitioner, v. Honorable Gayle L. CRANE.

No. 19-6962

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Missouri, Southern District denied.