alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7480

RICHARD JESSO BILLUK,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RICHARD CATERISANO, District Director,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA04-2334-1-RDB)

Submitted: January 27, 2005 Decided: February 3, 2005

Before LUTTIG and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Jesso Billuk, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Richard Jesso Billuk seeks to appeal the district court’s

order dismissing a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition for lack of

jurisdiction. The § 2241 petition, filed by Redina Perez, Billuk’s

fiancé seeking to act as his “next friend,” seeks to enjoin the

Department of Homeland Security from deporting Billuk to his native

country of Guam. The district court dismissed the action stating

that Perez lacked standing, and that she failed to establish her

status as Billuk’s “next friend” because she offered no explanation

as to why Billuk was unable to file on his own behalf. Billuk now

appeals. However, because Billuk was not a party to or an

intervenor in the proceeding filed by Perez, he lacks standing to

challenge the decision on appeal. Davis v. Scott, 176 F.3d 805,

807 (4th Cir. 1999) (holding that a prisoner lacked standing to

appeal the district court’s dismissal of a habeas petition filed by

his wife, acting “on behalf of” her husband). Accordingly, we

dismiss this appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit  32 -  Certification  of Chief  Executive  Officer  and Chief  Financial
               Officer - Sarbanes-Oxley Section 906


Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. section 1350, the undersigned officers of Triad Guaranty
Inc. (the "Company"),  hereby certifies,  to such officer's knowledge,  that the
Company's  Quartely  Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 (the
"Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d),  as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.


 Date:  August 9, 2004


                                     By:  /s/ Darryl W. Thompson
                                          ----------------------
                                          Darryl W. Thompson
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer


                                     By:  /s/ Ron D. Kessinger
                                          --------------------
                                          Ron D. Kessinger
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer




The signed original of this written statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

MYCHOICE, LLC 

 v. 

TAIV, INC.

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

 Case No. 2:23-CV-0507-JRG-RSP 

CORRECTED JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DISCOVERY ORDER 

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:

Plaintiff MyChoice, LLC and Defendant TaiV, Inc. jointly file this Corrected Joint Motion 

for Entry of Discovery Order and request that the proposed Discovery Order filed herewith be 

adopted by the Court and used in the above-styled matter. The Parties do not seek to modify the 

Court’s default Discovery Order, other than to include limitations on discovery in paragraph 5 

thereof. 

Dated: June 12, 2024 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s / Michael C. Gilleran 

Michael C. Gilleran 

(Mass. BBO No. 192210) 

Pro hac vice allowed 

michael.gilleran@fisherbroyles.com 

FISHERBROYLES, LLP 

75 State Street, Suite 100, PMB 4418 

Boston, Massachusetts 02109 

Direct: 781.489.5680 

Mobile: 339.237.1384 

LEAD ATTORNEY 

 

/s/ Chris P. Perque___ 

Chris P. Perque 

Texas State Bar No. 24005828 

FisherBroyles, LLP 

2925 Richmond Ave., Suite 1200 

Houston, TX 77098 

Phone: 832.604.4417 

Facsimile: 832.377.5929

Case 2:23-cv-00507-JRG-RSP Document 24 Filed 06/12/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 490
2 

Email: chris.perque@fisherbroyles.com 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF, 

MYCHOICE LLC

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/Phil Haack ___ 

Ryan J. Marton (Admitted E.D. Tex.) 

ryan@martonribera.com 

Phil Haack (Admitted E.D. Tex.) 

phaack@martonribera.com 

Hector Ribera (Admitted E.D. Tex.) 

hector@martonribera.com 

Carolyn Chang (Admitted E.D. Tex.)

carolyn@martonribera.com 

MARTON RIBERA SCHUMANN & 

CHANG LLP 

548 Market Street, Suite 36117 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

415-360-2514 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT 

TAIV, INC.

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE 

Counsel for the parties conferred via email regarding the above motion in accordance with 

Local Rule CV-7(i), and the motion is unopposed. 

/s/Chris P. Perque 

Chris P. Perque 

Case 2:23-cv-00507-JRG-RSP Document 24 Filed 06/12/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 491
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1

<S>                                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                     SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           56,244
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    406,562
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 462,806
<PP&E>                                           783,555
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,275,039
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            10,597,521
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         189,746
<OTHER-SE>                                      (4,928,501)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,275,039
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                (456,295)
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 35,897,047
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (193,885)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (38,782,439)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (38,782,439)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (38,782,439)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.24)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.65

 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO

AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

Pursuant to Section 7(c) of the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated December 31, 2008, by and between Clean Energy Fuels Corp., Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Andrew J. Littlefair, an individual (the “Executive”) (collectively, the “Parties”), the Parties hereby adopt the following amendment to the Agreement, to be effective as of the date specified below. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.  All other terms and conditions of the Agreement that are not modified below shall continue to remain in full force and effect.

 

The first sentence of Section 2 of the Agreement is restated in its entirety to read as follows:

 

“Employer agrees to employ Employee and Employee agrees to serve Employer, in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, for a term commencing on the Restatement Date and ending on December 31, 2015 (the “Term”).”

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this amendment to the Agreement to be duly executed, to be effective as of February 17, 2012.

 

	
 
    	
“EMPLOYER”
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
CLEAN ENERGY FUELS CORP.,
    
	
 
    	
a Delaware corporation
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ Richard R. Wheeler
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Richard R. Wheeler
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    	
Chief Financial Officer
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
“EMPLOYEE”
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
/s/ Andrew J. Littlefair
    
	
 
    	
Andrew J. Littlefair
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL OP-OFA-018]

*Responsible Agency:*                     Office of Federal Activities, General Information 202-564-5632 or                     *https://www.epa.gov/​nepa.*

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)

Filed May 16, 2022 10 a.m. EST Through May 23, 2022 10 a.m. EST

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

*Notice:*                     Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment letters on EISs are available at:                     *https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/​cdx-enepa-public/​action/​eis/​search.*

                    EIS No. 20220073, Revised Final, USFS, CA, Lassen National Forest Over-Snow Vehicle (OSV) Use Designation,                     *Review Period Ends:*                     06/27/2022, Contact: Kathleen Moore 530-252-6638.                

Dated: May 23, 2022.

Cindy S. Barger,

Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 2022-11429 Filed 5-26-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
**Exhibit 32.1**

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION—CEO

In connection with the Annual Report of J.B. Poindexter & Co., Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, John B. Poindexter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

To the best of my knowledge, after reasonable investigation:

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: September 5, 2007 | By /s/ John B. Poindexter                   |   |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------------------|--------|
|                    | John  B. Poindexter, Chairman of the Board, |
|                    | President and Chief  Executive Officer      |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of theReport or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

WYOMING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 

HOLDINGS, LLC,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SHOT SCOPE TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.,

Defendant. 

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00562-JRG

ORDER

Before the Court is the Joint Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice (the 

“Stipulation”) filed by Plaintiff Wyoming Intellectual Property Holdings, LLC (“Plaintiff”) and 

Defendant Shot Scope Technologies, Ltd. (“Defendant”). (Dkt. No. 7.) In the Stipulation, Plaintiff 

dismisses all claims against Defendant with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 

Having considered the Stipulation, the Court ACCEPTS AND ACKNOWLEDGES 

that all claims and causes of action asserted by Plaintiff against Defendant in the above-captioned 

case are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is further ORDERED that each party bear its 

own costs, attorneys’ fees, and expenses. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE the above-captioned 

case. 

.

____________________________________

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 18th day of April, 2024.

Case 2:23-cv-00562-JRG Document 8 Filed 04/19/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 99
Ronald Lee ALEXANDER, Petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 19-7212.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
# C_2017177EN.01000301.xml

| 3.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 177/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 177/3

---

Adoption of Commission Decision on the notification by Romania of a modified transitional national plan referred to in Article 32(6) of Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions

(2017/C 177/04)

On 2 June 2017, the Commission adopted Commission Decision C(2017) 3619 on the notification by Romania of a modified transitional national plan referred to in Article 32(6) of Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on industrial emissions (1).

1

This document is available on the following internet site: https://circabc.europa.eu/w/browse/36205e98-8e7a-47d7-808d-931bc5baf6ee

---

(1)  OJ L 334, 17.12.2010, p. 17.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 35 AND 36 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          14,698
<SECURITIES>                                    17,640
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,866
<ALLOWANCES>                                       840
<INVENTORY>                                     20,822
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                81,320
<PP&E>                                          24,908
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,098
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  97,216
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,585
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           605
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,803
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    97,216
<SALES>                                        100,430
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               100,430
<CGS>                                           59,126
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   59,126
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   120
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  26
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,527)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,814)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,713)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,713)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.41)
        

</TABLE>
Anthony G. BRYANT, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, et al.

No. 18-9246

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Elizabeth ALEXANDER, Petitioner, v. BLOOMINGDALE'S, INC.

No. 19-7730.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Gregory Joel SITZMANN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7525.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied. Justice Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Juanita NICHOLS, Petitioner, v. RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

No. 19-242

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Alireza VAZIRABADI, Petitioner, v. DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITAL AUTHORITY, et al.

No. 19-943.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
ex10-1.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 



 


Mr. Carl Warden


1516 Country Club Dr.,


Los Altos, CA 94024


 


April 5, 2012


 


Mr. Don Gottschalk, CFO


Valence Technology, Inc.


12303 Technology Blvd


Suite 950


Austin, TX 78727


 


Re: Purchase Of July 13, 2005 Secured Loan Between SFTI, Inc and Valence Technology, Inc.


 


Dear Mr. Gottschalk:


 


This letter is to advise you that I have purchased the Loan Agreement noted above (the "Loan Agreement") from SFTI, Inc. effective March 2012. I believe you have been separately notified of the sale of the Loan Agreement by SFTI, Inc.


 


As the holder of the Loan Agreement, I am extending the due date for payment of the principal of the loan of $3,000,000 to June 30, 2012. All other terms and conditions of the loan remain the same. I did not purchase the Warrants. I will separately contact you with my bank account information for payment of the interest and principal on the loan.


 


Sincerely,


 


/s/ Carl Warden


 


Carl Warden


 


April 30, 2012
Exhibit AC

Redacted in Entirety

Case 2:24-cv-00021-JRG Document 54-30 Filed 07/18/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 3516
Jason BROOKS, Petitioner, v. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.

No. 18-9753

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
By Nakisha Love at 11:51 am, Nov 03, 2023

Case 2:23-cv-00507-JRG-RSP Document 5 Filed 11/06/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 33
11/3/2023

Case 2:23-cv-00507-JRG-RSP Document 5 Filed 11/06/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 34
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/30/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       37,940
COMMITMENTS
   6,455    4,747    1,112   18,812   22,596   26,379   28,455   11,561    9,485

CHANGES FROM 04/23/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -597)
     806      352     -819       27      -76       14     -543     -611      -53

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    17.0     12.5      2.9     49.6     59.6     69.5     75.0     30.5     25.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       51)
      10        9        3       30       23       40       35
```

----

Updated May 3, 2013
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 30, 2021

a0623

Order 

Clerk

June 30, 2021

162692

BUDDY A. LEWIS, SR., Deceased,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 162692

COA: 350247

MCAC: 18-000008

LEXAMAR CORP., ZURICH AMERICAN

INSURANCE CO., and GALLAGHER 

BASSETT SERVICES,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 17, 2020 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on the application. MCR 7.305(H)(1). 

The appellant shall file a supplemental brief addressing whether the appellant’s 

injuries arose out of and in the course of his employment with appellee LexaMar Corp. 

such that LexaMar Corp. is required to pay compensation under MCL 418.301(1). See 

Smith v Chrysler Group, LLC, 331 Mich App 492, 497-498 (2020); Larson, Workers’ 

Compensation Law § 27.03(1)(c)(2019). The appellant’s brief shall be filed by October 

25, 2021, with no extensions except upon a showing of good cause. In the brief, citations 

to the record must provide the appendix page numbers as required by MCR 7.312(B)(1). 

The appellees shall file a supplemental brief within 21 days of being served with the 

appellant’s brief. A reply, if any, must be filed by the appellant within 14 days of being 

served with the appellees’ brief. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their 

application papers.

The total time allowed for oral argument shall be 40 minutes: 20 minutes for the 

appellant and 20 minutes for the appellees. MCR 7.314(B)(2).