alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
F 03.312012 Ex 10.2






Exhibit 10.2




Amended and Restated Annual Incentive Compensation Plan Metrics for 2012
On March 30, 2012, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company amended the specific performance goals and business criteria to be used for purposes of determining any future cash awards for the 2012 participants, including executive officers (filed as Exhibit 10-N-4 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011), under the Company's shareholder-approved Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008).
For all participants, the performance criteria and weightings to be used for 2012 under the plan include attaining specified levels of:
		
	•
	Total Company pre-tax profits* (35%),


		
	•
	Total Automotive operating-related cash flow* (35%),


		
	•
	Total Company cost performance (10%),


		
	•
	Total Company market shares (10%), and


		
	•
	Total Company quality metrics (10%).




Based on business performance results for 2012 against the targeted levels established for each metric, the Compensation Committee will determine the percentage of the target award that is earned, which could range between 0% and 200% depending on actual performance achieved relative to the target levels.


*Excludes special items
Otto Anael Perez CASTILLO, Petitioner, v. William P. BARR, Attorney General.

No. 19-442.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Kabil Anton DJENASEVIC, aka Anton Genase, aka Kabil Genase, aka Kabil Kraja, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9816

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
exv10w25






Exhibit 10.25




TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY 

COAL ACQUISITION & SUPPLY

1101 Market Street, MR 2A

Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402-2801




CONTRACT SUPPLEMENT



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 

	TO:

	 	Armstrong Coal Company Inc
	 	Supplement No.
	 	1	 
	 

	 	7701 Forsyth Boulevard 10th Floor
	 	Date
	 	March 30, 2009

	 

	 	St. Louis MO 63105
	 	Group No.
	 	635	 
	 

	 	 	 	Contract No.
	 	40685	 
	 

	 	 	 	Plant
	 	Various

	 

	 	 	 	Name of Mine
	 	Parkway






Attention Mr. Martin Wilson



Per an agreement between Kenny Allen and TVA per phone discussion on 3/13/2009.


Armstrong Coal Company Inc. shall provide sampling and weighing services for coal shipped by
truck from the Parkway mine to TVA’s Paradise Fossil Plant.



Section 7.01 shall be amended to designate “Contractor Sampling/contractor Analysis Section
7.2” for coal shipped by truck to TVA’s Paradise Fossil
Plant.



The coal price shall be increased by $0.20 per ton to cover the cost for the sampling and
weighing requirement required to provide these services.



TVA reserves the right to modify this agreement with respect to which party performs the
sampling and weighing of truck coal with a 30 days written notice by supplement to Armstrong
Coal Company Inc. In the event TVA exercises this option the Contract price of coal shall be
reduced by $0.20 per ton.



The Base Price as prescribed in Section 6 of the Contract shall not be affected by this
supplement. Quality adjustments shall be calculated on the Base Price as defined in Section 6.0
Price of the Contract.



All other terms and conditions of the Contract remain unchanged.



Please complete the acceptance below and return a signed copy of this contract supplement to
this office. You should retain the other signed copy for your files.



In the event Contractor fails to execute this Supplement in the acceptance space
provided below or fails to return such executed Supplement to TVA, shipment of coal to TVA
following the date of Contractor’s receipt of this Supplement shall constitute an acceptance by
Contractor of all the terms and conditions of this Supplement, unless within five (5) business
days of the date of receipt of this Supplement, Contractor notifies TVA, both orally and in
writing that this Supplement is not accepted.




cc: Tate Rich, President

Delta Coals, LLC

95 White Bridge Road #404

Nashville Tennessee 37205




 









 





	 	 	 	 	 	 	 

	Accepted

	 	Armstrong Coal Co.	 	TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY	 	 
	 

	 	 

          Company
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By
	 	/s/ Martin D. Wilson	 	/s/ Eddie Spicer	 	 
	 

	 	 

Signature
	 	 

Eddie Spicer
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Fuel Contract Administrator	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	President	 	/s/ 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Title

	 	 	 	Contract Support Specialist	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	4/9/09	 	/s/ 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Date

	 	 	 	Manager of Coal Supply
**Exhibit 32.2 — Certification of Chief Financial Officer — Sarbanes-Oxley Section 906**Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. section 1350, the undersigned officer of Triad Guaranty Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 andthe information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.      Date:     August 9, 2006      By: /s/ Kenneth W. Jones    Kenneth W. Jones
AO 435 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS FOR COURT USE ONLY (Rev. 10/23) 

TRANSCRIPT ORDER DUE DATE: 

Please Read Instructions: 

1. NAME 2. PHONE NUMBER 3. DATE 

Tamera Martinez (512) 936-0677 5/1/2024 

4. DELIVERY ADDRESS OR EMAIL 5. CITY 6. STATE 1

7. ZIP CODE 

tamera.martinez@oag.texas.gov Austin TX 78640

8. CASE NUMBER 1

9.ITJDGE DA TES OF PROCEEDINGS 

6:23-cv-00609-JDK Jeremv D. Kernodle 10. FROM 4/23/2024 11. TO 4/23/2024

12. CASE NAME LOCATION OF PROCEEDINGS 

The Daily Wire, et al. v. Department of State, et al. 13. CITY Tyler 14. STATE Texas

15. ORDER FOR 

□ APPEAL □ CRIMINAL □ CRIMINAL ITJSTICE ACT □ BANKRUPTCY

[Eil NON-APPEAL □ CIVIL □ IN FORMA PAUPERIS □ OTHER 

16. TRANSCRIPT REQUESTED (Specify portion(s) and date(s) of proceeding(s) for which transcript is requested)

PORTIONS DATE(S) PORTION(S) DATE(S) 

__J VOIR DIRE __JI TESTIMONY (Specify Witness) 

__J OPENING STATEMENT (Plaintiff) 

__J OPENING STATEMENT (Defendant) 

__J CLOSING ARGUMENT (Plaintiff) __JI PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDING (Spcy) 

__J CLOSING ARGUMENT (Defendant) 

__J OPINION OF COURT 

__J JURY INSTRUCTIONS XJl OTHER (Specify) 

__J SENTENCING Motion Hearinq 4/23/2024 

__J BAIL HEARING 

17. ORDER

ORIGINAL ADDITIONAL CATEGORY (Includes Certified Copy to FIRST COPY COPIES NO. OF PAGES ESTIMATE COSTS 

Clerk for Records of the Court) 

NO. OF COPIES 

30-Day □ □ 

NO. OF COPIES 

14-Day □ □ 

NO. OF COPIES 

7-Day □ □ 

NO. OF COPIES 

3-Day □ □ 

NO. OF COPIES 

Next-Day □ �

NO. OF COPIES 

2-Hour □ □ 

REALTIME □ □ 

CERTIFICATION (18. & 19.) 

By signing below, I certify that I will pay all charges ESTIMATE TOTAL 

( deoosit olus additional). 0.00 

18. SIGNATURE PROCESSED BY 

19. DATE PHONE NUMBER 

5/1/2024 

TRANSCRIPT TO BE PREPARED BY COURT ADDRESS 

DATE BY 

ORDER RECEIVED 

DEPOSIT PAID DEPOSIT PAID 

TRANSCRIPT ORDERED TOTAL CHARGES 0.00 

TRANSCRIPT RECEIVED LESS DEPOSIT 0.00 

ORDERING PARTY NOTIFIED 

TO PICK UP TRANSCRIPT TOTAL REFUNDED 

PAR TY RECEIVED TRANSCRIPT TOTAL DUE 0.00 

DISTRIBUTION: COURT COPY TRANSCRIPTION COPY ORDER RECEIPT ORDER COPY 

I I 

_J - _J 

I 

~ I 

I 

J J 

_J _J 

.I I 

I _J 

_j J 

I I 

/ /4~~~ 

C/ lu 

Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 49 Filed 05/01/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1772
Michael A. SALAZAR, Petitioner v. HEB GROCERY COMPANY, LP, et al.

No. 19-5016

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District denied.
Jackie DUNCAN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5550

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Addendum to Offer Letter to Peter J. Maloney



 Exhibit 10.6 

 
 



 
 May 8, 2008 
 Peter Maloney 
 [Address] 

Dear Peter, 

You currently hold an option (the “New Hire Option”) to purchase 5,000,000 shares of the Common Stock of E2open, Inc. (the
“Company”) for $0.05 per share. 
 If at any time within one year following your hire date (January 30, 2008) the
Company issues stock for the purpose of raising new capital or canceling outstanding indebtedness, and you are then employed on a full-time basis by the Company at the time of such stock issuance, the Company will grant you a stock option to
purchase such number of shares of common stock equal to one (1%) percent of the shares issued. The preceding sentence shall not apply to any other stock issuance of any kind whatsoever, including but not limited to stock issued in connection
with a merger, acquisition or pursuant to the Company’s employee stock plans. 
 Any additional stock option that is
granted to you pursuant to this letter shall be subject to the same terms and conditions as are described in your offer letter dated December 19, 2007 for the New Hire Option except that the exercise price of the option shares shall be equal to
the fair market value per share of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of grant. 
 This letter agreement constitutes
the complete agreement between us with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes and replaces all prior or contemporaneous agreements, written and oral, regarding this subject matter. 

 

			
	 Sincerely,

	
	 /s/ Amy
Reichanadter                                    

Amy Reichanadter

	 Senior Vice President, Human Resources

	 E2open, Inc.

	
	 Agreed to and accepted:

	
	 /s/ Peter Maloney

	 Peter Maloney

		
	 Date:
	 	 6/10/08
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

ORDER

 AND NOW, this ____ day of _______________________, 2024, having considered 

DEFENDANT MACY’S INC.’S REWENED MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO 

STATE A CLAIM PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b)(6), 

and all subsequent briefing, the Court hereby GRANTS the Motion.

 Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. 

SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

MACY’S, INC., 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil Action 

No. 2:23-cv-00583-JRG 

Judge Rodney Gilstrap 

Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 24-1 Filed 05/13/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 376
Order entered March 19, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00355-CR

EX PARTE JEFFREY WAYNE FUJISAKA

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416-80264-2015

ORDER

Appellant has appealed the trial court’s order denying him the relief sought by his pretrial 

application for writ of habeas corpus seeking to have section 43.25 of the Texas Penal Code 

declared unconstitutional. This is an accelerated appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 31.

We ORDER the trial court to prepare a certification of appellant’s right to appeal for 

inclusion in the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a), (d); Cortez v. State, 420 S.W.3d 803

(Tex. Crim. App. 2013).

We ORDER the Collin County District Clerk to file the clerk’s record containing the 

documents related to the case, including the trial court’s order ruling on appellant’s application 

for writ of habeas corpus, by APRIL 6, 2015.
We ORDER Susan Maienschein, official court reporter of the 416th Judicial District 

Court, to file, by APRIL 6, 2015, the complete reporter’s record, including any exhibits, of all 

hearings conducted on the application for writ of habeas corpus.

We ORDER appellant to file his brief by MAY 1, 2015. We ORDER the State to file its 

brief by MAY 26, 2015. If any party does not file its brief by the date specified, the appeal will 

be submitted without that party’s brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 31.1.

Absent further order of the Court, the appeal will be submitted without argument on 

JULY 1, 2015 before a panel consisting of Justices Fillmore, Myers, and Evans. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 31.1, 31.2.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the 

Honorable Chris Oldner, Presiding Judge, 416th Judicial District Court; Susan Maeinschein, 

official court reporter, 416th Judicial District Court; Andrea Stroh Thompson, Collin County 

District Clerk; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,048
<SECURITIES>                                     3,929
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,327
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,817
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,335
<PP&E>                                           1,764
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,094
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,326
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,148
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         22
<COMMON>                                           132
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,004
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,326
<SALES>                                          7,407
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,072
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,920
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,539
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    790
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                790
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       790
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 103 Received in Senate (RDS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 103

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 28, 2014

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District of Columbia 
              Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR D.C. SPECIAL 
              OLYMPICS LAW ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN.

    On October 3, 2014, or on such other date as the Speaker of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration 
of the Senate may jointly designate, the 29th annual District of 
Columbia Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution 
referred to as the ``event'') may be run through the Capitol Grounds to 
carry the Special Olympics torch to honor local Special Olympics 
athletes.

SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

    The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as may be 
necessary to carry out the event.

SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

    The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for physical 
preparations for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, in connection with the event.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 25, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cadus Pharmaceutical Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Russell D. Glass, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Russell D. Glass
----------------------------------------------
Russell D. Glass
President and Chief Executive Officer (Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer)

November 14, 2002









                                       20
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2302 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 864
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2302

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 7, 2000

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

                           September 29, 2000

  Reported under authority of the order of the Senate of September 28 
    (legislative day, September 22), 2000, by Mr. Thompson, without 
                               amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the building of the United States Postal Service located 
at 307 Main Street in Johnson City, New York, as the ``James W. McCabe, 
                      Sr. Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The building of the United States Postal Service located at 307 
Main Street in Johnson City, New York, shall be known and designated as 
the ``James W. McCabe, Sr. Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``James W. McCabe, Sr. Post 
Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 864

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H.R. 2302

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the building of the United States Postal Service located 
at 307 Main Street in Johnson City, New York, as the ``James W. McCabe, 
                      Sr. Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 29, 2000

  Reported under authority of the order of the Senate of September 28 
        (legislative day, September 22), 2000 without amendment
```
CENTURY III MALL PA LLC, Petitioner v. SEARS ROEBUCK & CO.

No. 18-1546

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,611
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,338
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (963)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,393
<PP&E>                                         375,854
<DEPRECIATION>                               (140,838)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 306,491
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,664
<BONDS>                                        244,597
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           115
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,332
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   306,491
<SALES>                                        123,021
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               123,021
<CGS>                                           54,407
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   73,120
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,827
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (21,333)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       308
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (21,641)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (21,641)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.88)
        

</TABLE>
Anthony ANDREWS, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6639

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petitions for rehearing denied.
Bradley CAMPBELL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7620.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.