alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States District Court

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

AZELE NIKUZE

V.

TEXAS HEALTH RESOURCES

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:23CV1082

JUDGE MAZZANT/JUDGE JOHNSON

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, 

this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. 

On June 14, 2024, the Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation (the “Report”) 

(Dkt. #10) that Plaintiff Azele Nikuze (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Texas Health Resources’ 

(“Defendant”) Joint Motion to Compel Arbitration and Brief in Support (the “Motion to Compel”) 

(Dkt. #3) be granted in part and denied in part. Specifically, the Report (Dkt. #10) recommended 

that the parties be referred to binding arbitration, as agreed to by the parties, and that this suit be 

stayed pending resolution of arbitration.

Having received the Report (Dkt. #10) of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no timely 

objections being filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the 

Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and 

conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Compel (Dkt. #3) is GRANTED 

IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The parties are referred to binding arbitration, as agreed to by 

the parties, and this suit is stayed pending the resolution of arbitration.

Case 4:23-cv-01082-ALM-KPJ Document 11 Filed 08/07/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 59
2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties submit a joint status report to the Court 

within fourteen (14) days of the arbitration’s conclusion.

Case 4:23-cv-01082-ALM-KPJ Document 11 Filed 08/07/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 60
Terry GOODEN, Petitioner, v. U.S. NAVY/U.S. MARINE CORPS, et al.

No. 19-8308.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 26, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Sinyo SILKEUTSABAY, et al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7623.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Specimen common stock certificate of the Registrant



 Exhibit 4.1 

 

	
	












 THE BOARD OF THIS CORPORATION HAS THE AUTHORITY TO CREATE AND DETERMINE THE RELATIVE RIGHTS AND PREFERENCES
OF CLASSES OR SERIES OF SHARES OF CAPITAL STOCK OTHER THAN COMMON STOCK. THIS CORPORATION WILL FURNISH TO ANY SHAREHOLDER UPON WRITTEN REQUEST SENT TO ITS PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES, AND WITHOUT CHARGE, A FULL STATEMENT OF THE BOARD’S
AUTHORITY TO CREATE AND DETERMINE THE RELATIVE RIGHTS AND PREFERENCES OF CLASSES OR SERIES OF SHARES OF CAPITAL STOCK AS WELL AS THE DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES, LIMITATIONS AND RELATIVE RIGHTS OF THE SHARES OF EACH CLASS OR SERIES THEN OUTSTANDING OR
AUTHORIZED TO BE ISSUED. 
  
  

The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full
according to applicable laws or regulations: 
  

															
	 TEN COM
	 	 –
	 	as tenants in common	  		  	UTMA –	  	  
	  	Custodian	  	  

		 		 		  		  		  	(Cust)	  		  	(Minor)
	 TEN ENT
	 	 –
	 	as tenants by entireties	  		  		  	under Uniform Transfers to Minors
							
	 JT TEN
	 	 –
	 	 as joint tenants with right of survivorship
 and not as tenants in common
	  		  		  	Act	  	  

		 		 	  		  		  		  	(State)

 Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in above list. 

 
  
 For value received              hereby sell, assign, and transfer unto 

 

			
	PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER	  	
	IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE	  	
	 	  	
	 	  	 

  

			
	 
	(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE)
	    
	    
	    	 	Shares
	of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint
                                         
  Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.

  

							
	Dated	 	  
	 		  	 X

				
		 		 		  	 X

		 		 		  	  
 NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE
NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.


 SIGNATURE GUARANTEED 

			
	  
 ALL GUARANTEES
MUST BE MADE BY A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION (SUCH AS A BANK OR BROKER) WHICH IS A PARTICIPANT IN THE SECURITIES TRANSFER AGENTS MEDALLION PROGRAM (“STAMP”), THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, INC. MEDALLION SIGNATURE PROGRAM (“MSP”), OR
THE STOCK EXCHANGES MEDALLION PROGRAM (“SEMP”) AND MUST NOT BE DATED. GUARANTEES BY A NOTARY PUBLIC ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE.
| (logo) WELLS

            FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is herebymade to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2018,by and among GS MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORPORATION II, as Depositor, WELLS FARGOBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC,as Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator,WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee and PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCELLC, as Operating Advisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer with respect toCommercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2018-GS9 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, ManagingDirector of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.           A reviewof the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from March 1, 2018through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance perthe Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2.           To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary 2019.

 

 

/s/ Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector 

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of CIBER, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mac J. Slingerlend,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          the Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  March 4, 2010 |                    |
|---------------------------|-------------------------|
|                      |                    |
| By                        | /s/  Mac J. Slingerlend |   |
| Mac  J. Slingerlend       |                    |
| Chief  Executive Officer  |                    |
|                           |                         |  |

 

----
Jason M. LUND, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9719

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Ruth Ellen REEVES, Petitioner, v. Andrew M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security.

No. 19-7436.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

*2536Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
| Subsidiary                                   |   | State/Countryof Incorporation |   | Parent                                       |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|                                         |   |                          |   |                                         |
| Gaming Partners International USA, Inc. |   | Nevada                        |   | Gaming Partners International Corporation    |
|                                         |   |                          |   |                                         |
| Gaming Partners International SAS            |   | France                        |   | Gaming Partners International Corporation    |
|                                         |   |                          |   |                                         |
| GPI Mexicana, S.A. de C.V.                   |   | Mexico                        |   | Gaming Partners International USA, Inc. |
|                                         |   |                          |   |                                         |
| Gaming Partners International Asia Limited   |   | Macau                         |   | Gaming Partners International USA, Inc. |

----
Terry MARGHEIM, Petitioner v. Kenneth BUCK, et al.

No. 18-9530

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          10,488
<SECURITIES>                                         9
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,642
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,123
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,162
<PP&E>                                           1,547
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,599
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  52,868
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,203
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           464
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,675
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    52,868
<SALES>                                          5,114
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,041
<CGS>                                              104
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,434
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,651
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   4
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,887)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,888)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,888)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 95 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 95

   Expressing the sense of Congress regarding support for voluntary, 
    incentive-based, private land conservation implemented through 
     cooperation with local soil and water conservation districts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 2014

  Mr. Hudson submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of Congress regarding support for voluntary, 
    incentive-based, private land conservation implemented through 
     cooperation with local soil and water conservation districts.

Whereas over 70 percent of the contiguous United States is privately owned;
Whereas the future of the environment is determined by the decisions made by the 
        men and women who own and manage that land, including urban landscapes;
Whereas world population is projected to reach 9,000,000,000 people by 2050;
Whereas increased production will be needed from agricultural land to feed the 
        increasing population;
Whereas meeting these needs will make caring for the environment more difficult; 
        and
Whereas landowners work to ensure they sustain a healthy environment to support 
        abundant wildlife: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That--
            (1) Congress supports the conservation of the Nation's 
        natural resources and working lands; and
            (2) it is the sense of Congress that voluntary, incentive-
        based, private land conservation, provided in partnership with 
        local conservation districts, is necessary to sustain natural 
        resources, meet the needs of a growing population, and ensure 
        safe, abundant, and adequate resources for current and future 
        generations.
                                 <all>
```
III 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 122 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 11, 2014 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for a correction in the enrollment of H.R. 83. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 83, 

3 the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall amend the 

4 long title so as to read: ‘‘Making consolidated appropriaVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:02 Dec 16, 2014 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HC122.RDS HC122

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HCON 122 RDS 

1 tions for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2015, and 

2 for other purposes.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 11, 

2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Gregory Alan ROWE, Petitioner, v. Michael CLARK, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Albion, et al.

No. 19-6833.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 27, 2020

Petition for rehearing denied.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350


     In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Mendocino
Brewing Company, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the annual period ended
December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, N. Mahadevan, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Date: August 31, 2005                   /s/ N. Mahadevan
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name:  N. Mahadevan
                                        Title: Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-4345

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ZEB ANTHONY HENSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior

District Judge. (6:10-cr-00013-nkm-1)

Submitted: August 25, 2011 Decided: August 29, 2011

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry W. Shelton, Federal Public Defender, Christine Madeleine 

Lee, Research and Writing Attorney, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC 

DEFENDER, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. Timothy J. Heaphy, 

United States Attorney, Jean B. Hudson, Assistant United States 

Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Zeb Anthony Henson pled guilty to possession with 

intent to distribute of five grams or more of actual 

methamphetamine, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (2006). He received a 

sentence of eighty-four months’ imprisonment. Henson appeals 

his sentence, contending that the district court abused its 

discretion when it denied his request for a downward departure 

under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4A1.3 (2010), on the 

ground that his criminal history category substantially overrepresented the seriousness of his criminal history. For the 

reasons explained below, we dismiss the appeal.

The district court has the discretion to depart 

downward “[i]f reliable information indicates that the 

defendant’s criminal history category substantial overrepresents the seriousness of the defendant’s criminal history 

or the likelihood that the defendant will commit other crimes.” 

U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4A1.3(b)(1) (2010). 

However, “[w]e lack the authority to review a sentencing court’s 

denial of a downward departure unless the court failed to 

understand its authority to do so.” United States v. Brewer, 

520 F.3d 367, 371 (4th Cir. 2008). Our review of the record 

discloses that the district court did not fail to recognize its 

authority to depart. Thus, Henson’s claim is not reviewable on 

appeal.
3

We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Vondale Lamar KINCAIDE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6965.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           476,532
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      24,245
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 660,508
<CASH>                                           5,570
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             139,991
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         104,726
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,664,797
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                599,846
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            378,081
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 98,349
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              190
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     293,273
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,664,797
<PREMIUMS>                                     303,368
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             18,100
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 135
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   2,958
<BENEFITS>                                     204,243
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     89,026
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            41,281
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (19,723)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (7,362)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (12,361)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (15,085)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.82)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 596,797
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                599,846
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Ikemefula Charles IBEABUCHI, petitioner, v. MARICOPA COMMISSIONERS.

No. 18-8657.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 5, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.