IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION

ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

RESTAURANT BRANDS 

INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Defendant.

§

§ Case No. 2:23-cv-00288-JRG-RSP

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

DISCOVERY ORDER

After a review of the pleaded claims and defenses in this action, in furtherance of the 

management of the Court’s docket under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16, and after receiving 

the input of the parties to this action, it is ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

1. Initial Disclosures. In lieu of the disclosures required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

26(a)(1), each party shall disclose to every other party the following information:

(a) the correct names of the parties to the lawsuit;

(b) the name, address, and telephone number of any potential parties;

(c) the legal theories and, in general, the factual bases of the disclosing party’s claims 

or defenses (the disclosing party need not marshal all evidence that may be offered 

at trial);

(d) the name, address, and telephone number of persons having knowledge of relevant 

facts, a brief statement of each identified person’s connection with the case, and a 

brief, fair summary of the substance of the information known by any such person;

Case 2:23-cv-00288-JRG-RSP Document 33 Filed 12/19/23 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 277
- 2 -

(e) any indemnity and insuring agreements under which any person or entity carrying 

on an insurance business may be liable to satisfy part or all of a judgment entered 

in this action or to indemnify or reimburse for payments made to satisfy the 

judgment;

(f) any settlement agreements relevant to the subject matter of this action; and

(g) any statement of any party to the litigation.

2. Disclosure of Expert Testimony.1 A party must disclose to the other parties the identity 

of any witness it may use at trial to present evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, 

703 or 705, and:

(a) if the witness is one retained or specially employed to provide expert testimony in 

the case or one whose duties asthe party’s employee regularly involve giving expert 

testimony, provide the disclosures required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

26(a)(2)(B) and Local Rule CV-26; and

(b) for all othersuch witnesses, provide the disclosure required by Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 26(a)(2)(C).

3. Additional Disclosures. Without awaiting a discovery request,2 each party will makethe

following disclosures to every other party:

(a) provide the disclosures required by the Patent Rules for the Eastern District of 

Texas with the following modifications to P.R. 3-1 and P.R. 3-3:

1 All expert reports should be written such that the report is organized with discrete 

paragraph numbers.

2 The Court anticipates that this disclosure requirement will obviate the need for requests 

for production.

Case 2:23-cv-00288-JRG-RSP Document 33 Filed 12/19/23 Page 2 of 9 PageID #: 278
- 3 -

i. If a party claiming patent infringement asserts that a claim element is a 

software limitation, the party need not comply with P.R. 3-1 for those claim 

elements until 30 days after source code for each Accused Instrumentality 

is produced by the opposing party. Thereafter, the party claiming patent 

infringement shall identify, on an element-by-element basis for each 

asserted claim, what source code of each Accused Instrumentality allegedly 

satisfies the software limitations of the asserted claim elements.

ii. If a party claiming patent infringement exercises the provisions of 

Paragraph 3(a)(i) of this Discovery Order, the party opposing a claim of 

patent infringement may serve, not later than 30 days after receipt of a 

Paragraph 3(a)(i) disclosure, supplemental “Invalidity Contentions” that 

amend only those claim elements identified as software limitations by the 

party claiming patent infringement.

(b) produce or permit the inspection of all documents, electronically stored 

information, and tangible things in the possession, custody, or control of the party 

that are relevant to the pleaded claims or defenses involved in this action, except to 

the extent these disclosures are affected by the time limits set forth in the Patent 

Rules for the Eastern District of Texas; and

(c) provide a complete computation of any category of damages claimed by any party 

to the action, and produce or permit the inspection of documents or other 

evidentiary material on which such computation is based, including materials 

bearing on the nature and extent of injuries suffered, except that the disclosure of

Case 2:23-cv-00288-JRG-RSP Document 33 Filed 12/19/23 Page 3 of 9 PageID #: 279
- 4 -

the computation of damages may be deferred until the time for Expert Disclosures 

if a party will rely on a damages expert.

4. Protective Orders. The Court will enter the parties’ Agreed Protective Order.

5. Discovery Limitations. The discovery in this cause is limited to the disclosuresdescribed 

in Paragraphs 1-3 together with:

(a) Interrogatories: Plaintiff may serve 25 interrogatories on Defendants. Defendants

may serve 25 interrogatories on Plaintiff.

(b) Requests for Admission: Plaintiff may serve up to 40 requests for admission on

Defendants, and Defendants may serve up to 40 requests for admission on Plaintiff. 

In addition, the parties will be permitted to serve unlimited requests for admissions 

for authentication of documents and things and/or whether a document qualifies as 

a printed publication under 35 U.S.C. § 102.

(c) Depositions: Plaintiff may take up to 42 total hours of deposition testimony for

Defendants (inclusive of both 30(b)(1) and 30(b)(6) depositions). Defendants may

collectively take up to 42 total hours of deposition testimony of Plaintiff (inclusive 

of both 30(b)(1) and 30(b)(6) depositions).

(d) Expert Depositions: Each party is limited to 3 testifying expert witnesses. Each

expert may be deposed for up to seven (7) hours per report.

(e) Third Party Discovery: The parties may conduct third party discovery by serving

deposition subpoenas and document subpoenas. Plaintiff is limited to 60 hours of 

third-party deposition hours. Defendants are limited to 60 hours of third-party 

deposition hours. This paragraph does not apply to any party witnesses offered 

under paragraph 5(c) above.

Case 2:23-cv-00288-JRG-RSP Document 33 Filed 12/19/23 Page 4 of 9 PageID #: 280
- 5 -

(f) Any party may later move to modify these limitations.

6. Privileged Information. There is no duty to disclose privileged documents or 

information. However, the parties are directed to meet and confer concerning privileged 

documents or information after the Status Conference. By the deadline set in the Docket 

Control Order, the parties shall exchange privilege logs identifying the documents or 

information and the basis for any disputed claim of privilege in a manner that, without 

revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the other parties to assess 

the applicability of the privilege or protection. Any party may move the Court for an order 

compelling the production of any documents or information identified on any other party’s 

privilege log. If such a motion is made, the party asserting privilege shall respond to the 

motion within the time period provided by Local Rule CV-7. The party asserting privilege 

shall then file with the Court within 30 days of the filing of the motion to compel any proof 

in the form of declarations or affidavits to support their assertions of privilege, along with 

the documents over which privilege is asserted for in camera inspection. However, if the 

party asserting privilege seeks an in camera review by the Court, such party shall first 

obtain leave from the Court prior to delivery of documents to the Court.

7. Signature. The disclosures required by this Order shall be made in writing and signed by 

the party or counsel and shall constitute a certification that, to the best of the signer’s 

knowledge, information and belief, such disclosure is complete and correct as of the time 

it is made. If feasible, counsel shall meet to exchange disclosures required by this Order; 

otherwise, such disclosures shall be served as provided by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

5. The parties shall promptly file a notice with the Court that the disclosures required under 

this Order have taken place.

Case 2:23-cv-00288-JRG-RSP Document 33 Filed 12/19/23 Page 5 of 9 PageID #: 281
- 6 -

8. Duty to Supplement. After disclosure is made pursuant to this Order, each party is under 

a duty to supplement or correct its disclosures immediately if the party obtains information 

on the basis of which it knows that the information disclosed was either incomplete or 

incorrect when made, or is no longer complete or true.

9. Discovery Disputes.

(a) Except in cases involving claims of privilege, any party entitled to receive 

disclosures (“Requesting Party”) may, after the deadline for making disclosures, 

serve upon a party required to make disclosures (“Responding Party”) a written 

statement, in letter form or otherwise, of any reason why the Requesting Party 

believes that the Responding Party’s disclosures are insufficient. The written 

statement shall list, by category, the items the Requesting Party contends should be 

produced. The parties shall promptly meet and confer. If the parties are unable to 

resolve their dispute, then the Responding Party shall, within 14 days after service 

of the written statement upon it, serve upon the Requesting Party a written 

statement, in letter form or otherwise, which identifies (1) the requested items that 

will be disclosed, if any, and (2) the reasons why any requested items will not be 

disclosed. The Requesting Party may thereafter file a motion to compel.

(b) An opposed discovery related motion, or any response thereto, shall not exceed 7 

pages. Attachments to a discovery related motion, or a response thereto, shall not 

exceed 5 pages. No further briefing is allowed absent a request or order from the 

Court.

(c) Prior to filing any discovery related motion, the parties must fully comply with the 

substantive and procedural conference requirements of Local Rule CV-7(h) and (i).

Case 2:23-cv-00288-JRG-RSP Document 33 Filed 12/19/23 Page 6 of 9 PageID #: 282
- 7 -

Within 72 hours of the Court setting any discovery motion for a hearing, each 

party’s lead attorney (see Local Rule CV-11(a)) and local counsel shall meet and 

confer in person or by telephone, without the involvement or participation of other 

attorneys, in an effort to resolve the dispute without Court intervention.

(d) Counsel shall promptly notify the Court of the results of that meeting by filing a 

joint report of no more than two pages. Unless excused by the Court, each party’s 

lead attorney shall attend any discovery motion hearing set by the Court (though 

the lead attorney is not required to argue the motion).

(e) Any change to a party’s lead attorney designation must be accomplished by motion 

and order.

(f) Counsel are directed to contact the chambers of the undersigned for any “hot-line” 

disputes before contacting the Discovery Hotline provided by Local Rule CV26(e). If the undersigned is not available, the parties shall proceed in accordance 

with Local Rule CV-26(e).

10. No Excuses. A party is not excused from the requirements of this Discovery Order because 

it has not fully completed its investigation of the case, or because it challenges the 

sufficiency of another party’s disclosures, or because another party has not made its 

disclosures. Absent court order to the contrary, a party is not excused from disclosure 

because there are pending motions to dismiss, to remand or to change venue.

11. Filings. Only upon request from chambers shall counsel submit to the court courtesy 

copies of any filings.

12. Proposed Stipulations by the Parties Regarding Discovery.

Case 2:23-cv-00288-JRG-RSP Document 33 Filed 12/19/23 Page 7 of 9 PageID #: 283
- 8 -

(a) The parties agree that they will serve each other with copies of any subpoena or 

deposition notice directed to a third-party. A party receiving documents from a 

third party will provide copies of those documents to another party upon request, 

subject to the terms of any protective order entered in the case. A party scheduling 

a deposition of a third party shall provide notice of the deposition date to all parties 

by at least seven days prior to the deposition.

(b) The parties agree that the parties shall not be required to log any privileged 

documents created on or after the date of the Original Complaint in this action.

(c) The parties agree to accept service by email to all counsel of record for the party to 

be served.

(d) Testifying experts shall not be subject to discovery on any draft of their report or 

declarations in this case and such draft reports, declarations, notes, outlines, or any 

other writings leading up to an issued report or filed declaration in this litigation 

are exempt from discovery. In addition, all communications to and from a 

testifying expert, and all materials generated by a testifying expert with respect to 

that person’s work in this case, are exempt from discovery unless relied upon by 

the expert in forming any opinions in this litigation.

(e) The Parties will submit a proposed e-discovery order within forty-five (45) days 

after the Scheduling Conference.

(f) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d), inadvertent production of materials 

covered by the attorney-client privilege or work-product protection is not a waiver 

in this or any other federal or state proceeding. In case of inadvertent production, 

at the producing party’s request, the receiving party shall immediately return or

Case 2:23-cv-00288-JRG-RSP Document 33 Filed 12/19/23 Page 8 of 9 PageID #: 284
- 9 -

destroy the inadvertently produced materials. The producing party will provide a 

privilege log in accordance with Paragraph 6.

13. Standing Orders. The parties and counsel are charged with notice of and are required to 

fully comply with each of the Standing Orders of this Court. Such are posted on the Court’s 

websiteat http://www.txed.uscourts.gov/?q=court-annexed-mediation-plan. The substance 

of some such orders may be included expressly within this Discovery Order, while others 

(including the Court’s Standing Order Regarding Protection of Proprietary and/or 

Confidential Information to Be Presented to the Court During Motion and Trial Practice) 

are incorporated herein by reference. All such standing orders shall be binding on the 

parties and counsel, regardless of whether they are expressly included herein or made a 

part hereof by reference.

Case 2:23-cv-00288-JRG-RSP Document 33 Filed 12/19/23 Page 9 of 9 PageID #: 285