alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>    1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          10,557
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,924
<PP&E>                                       1,781,662
<DEPRECIATION>                               (242,620)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,704,778
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           48,538
<BONDS>                                        969,323
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    251,500
<COMMON>                                           207
<OTHER-SE>                                     229,657
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,704,778
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               301,233
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  152,856
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,607
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              55,555
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                154,174
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            154,174
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    360
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    82,237
<EPS-BASIC>                                       4.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.04


</TABLE>
Quinetta GRANT, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5159

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Christine HAM, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, Santa Clara County, et al.

No. 19-7424.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District denied.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 11, 2009

s0831 

# Order

September 11, 2009

139023

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139023 COA: 282451 Chippewa CC: 06-008336-FH THOMAS WESLEY POE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 21, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the AnnualReport of Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul K. Kaufmann, SeniorVice President and Corporate Controller of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Paul K. Kaufmann                            |   |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Paul K. Kaufmann                                |   |
| Senior Vice President  and Corporate Controller |   |
| March 2, 2010                              |   |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to Smurfit-Stone Container Corporationand will be retained by Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/12/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      107,707
COMMITMENTS
  25,388    4,791    1,792   74,436   98,007  101,616  104,590    6,091    3,117

CHANGES FROM 03/05/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     17,655)
     399      -34      822   15,216   15,908   16,437   16,696    1,218      959

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    23.6      4.4      1.7     69.1     91.0     94.3     97.1      5.7      2.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       70)
      10        5        6       39       32       52       40
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/12/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      229,533
COMMITMENTS
  63,868   28,417   10,814  128,536  175,792  203,218  215,023   26,315   14,510

CHANGES FROM 03/05/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     35,677)
    -377    1,147    6,437   21,909   18,817   27,969   26,401    7,708    9,276

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    27.8     12.4      4.7     56.0     76.6     88.5     93.7     11.5      6.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      145)
      40       18       12       69       47      116       70
```

----

Updated March 15, 2013
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

12/20/2023

Eastern District of Texas

PUSH DATA LLC,

4:23-cv-1124

Rent-A-Center, Inc.

Rent-A-Center, Inc.

c/o its Registered Agent

Corporation Service Company

251 Little Falls Drive

Wilmington, DE 19808

Trevor Beaty

trevor@beatylegal.com

514 North Elm Street

Sherman, Texas 75090

Telephone: (903) 287-5121

Facsimile: (903) 287-5145

Case 4:23-cv-01124-ALM Document 4 Filed 12/20/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 313
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

4:23-cv-1124

0.00

Case 4:23-cv-01124-ALM Document 4 Filed 12/20/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 314
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

Eastern District of Texas Headwater Research LLC Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al. 2:23-cv-00641-JRG-RSP Headwater Research LLC 01/03/2024 /s/ Qi Tong Qi Tong CA Bar No. 300347

Russ August & Kabat 

12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90025 ptong@raklaw.com (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00641-JRG-RSP Document 18 Filed 01/03/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 802
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 111 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 3230, 

3 the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall make the 

4 following corrections: 

5 (1) In section 101(a)(1)(B)(i), insert before the 

6 period at the end the following: ‘‘, including any 

7 physician furnishing services under such program’’. 
2 

•HCON 111 EH 

1 (2) In section 101(d)(3)(A), insert after 

2 ‘‘1395cc(a))’’ the following: ‘‘and participation 

3 agreements under section 1842(h) of such Act (42 

4 U.S.C. 1395u(h))’’. 

5 (3) In section 101(d)(3)(B)(i), strike ‘‘provider 

6 of service’’ and insert ‘‘provider of services’’. 

7 (4) In section 101(d)(3)(B)(i), insert before the 

8 semicolon the following: ‘‘and any physician or other 

9 supplier who has entered into a participation agree10 ment under section 1842(h) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 

11 1395u(h))’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 30, 2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 111 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives 

the bill H.R. 3230. to make certain corrections in the enrollment of
Exhibit 37 

 

Case 2:23-cv-00576-JRG-RSP Document 26-46 Filed 01/29/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1496
Experience & Education

View Dennis’ full profile

See who you know in common

Get introduced

Contact Dennis directly

Join to view full profile

Without Using Credit

Click for Details

People also viewed

Dennis Kooker

Princeton Junction, New Jersey, United States

1K followers · 500+ connections

See your mutual connections

Join to view profile

Sony Music Entertainment

Sony Music Entertainment

View Dennis’s full experience

By clicking Continue, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie

Policy.

Sign in Continue with Google

Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer at Sony Music Entertainment

New City, NY

Carmine Coppola

Connect

New York, NY

Chris Frankenberg

Connect

New York, NY

Julie Swidler

Case 2:23-cv-00576-JRG-RSP Document 26-46 Filed 01/29/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1497
In Re Patricia Ann McQUARRY, petitioner.

No. 18-6579.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. JUAN M ANUEL PENA-ANGUIANO, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 12-10473

D.C . No. 3:08-c r-00091-JSW M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Northe rn Distric t of C a lifornia Je ffre y S. White , Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d De c e m

be r 17, 2013 ** B e fore : GOODW IN, WALLAC E, a nd GR AB ER , C irc uit Judge s. Jua n M anue l Pe n a -Anguia

no a ppe a l s pro sefrom

the distric t c ourt’ s orde r de ny ing his pro se

m otion for a

se nte nc e re duc tion under 18 U.S.C . § 3582(c ). W e have jurisdic tion under 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we a ffirm . Pe na -Anguia

no c onte nds tha

t thedistric t c ourt e rre d by fa iling to gra

nt his 

# FIL ED D EC 30 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).re que s t for a se nte nc e re duc tion, a

rguing tha

t he should ha

ve re c e i ve d a

Guide line s de pa rture unde r U.S.S.G. § 5K3.1. The gove rnm e nt c o nte nds tha t this a ppe a l should bedismisse d ba se d on a n a ppe a l wa ive r. W e de c line to e n forc e the wa ive r and inste a d a ffirm

on them e rits. Thedistric t c ourt did not err in de ny i ng Pe na Anguia no’ s re q ue s t for a se nte n c e re d

uc tion be c a

u se he fa ile d to sta

te a va lid le ga l ba sis for re duc ing his sent e nc e . Se e 18 U.S.C . § 3582(c ). AFFIRM E D.

1 2 - 1 0 4 7 3 2
Larry BROWN, Petitioner, v. Andrew M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security

No. 18-9395

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed *134until October 28, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

RODDY LEE ZAVALA §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23cv334

J. BOLIN, ET AL. §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff RoddyLeeZavala, an inmate confined at the Stiles Unit, proceeding pro se, brought

the above-styled action. 

The above-styled action was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636 and the Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to the United States Magistrate Judge

for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case.

Discussion

Plaintiff submitted an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis in this action. A review

of the Application revealed Plaintiff should pay an initial partial filing fee. Accordingly, on

September 18, 2023, Plaintiff was ordered to pay an initial partial filing fee of $5.66. Plaintiff’s

compliance was due on or before the expiration of thirty (30) days from the date of the order. 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) authorizes the district court to dismiss an action for

failure to prosecute or for failure to comply with any court order. Larson v. Scott, 157 F.3d 1030,

1031 (5th Cir. 1998). “This authority [under Rule 41(b)] flows from the court’s inherent power to

control its docket and prevent undue delays in the disposition of pending cases.” Boudwin v.

Graystone Ins. Co., Ltd., 756 F.2d 399, 401 (5th Cir. 1985) (citing Link v. Wabash, R.R. Co., 370

U.S. 626, 629 (1962)). 

As of this date, Plaintiff has failed to pay the initial partial filing fee as ordered. Accordingly,

Plaintiff has failed to diligently prosecute this case. Therefore, this action should be dismissed

without prejudice pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b).

Case 1:23-cv-00334-MJT-CLS Document 5 Filed 10/24/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 17
Recommendation

This action should be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b).

Objections

Within fourteen days after being served with a copy of the magistrate judge’s report, any

party may serve and file written objections to the findings of facts, conclusions of law and

recommendations of the magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C).

Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings of facts, conclusions of law and

recommendations contained within this report within fourteen days after service shall bar an

aggrieved party from the entitlement of de novo review by the district court of the proposed findings,

conclusions and recommendations and from appellate review of factual findings and legal

conclusions accepted by the district court except on grounds of plain error. Douglass v. United

Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1417 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R.

CIV. P. 72.

.

___________________________________

Christine L Stetson

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SIGNED this the 24th day of October, 2023.

Case 1:23-cv-00334-MJT-CLS Document 5 Filed 10/24/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 18
NO. 07-05-0010-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TE XAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL B FEBRUARY 28, 2005

______________________________ JOSEPH ROBERTS AND J & L BAIL BONDS, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLE E

_________________________________ FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF OCHILTREE C OUNTY; NO. 2306; HONORAB LE KENN ETH RAY DONAHUE , JUDGE

_______________________________ Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and CAMPBELL, JJ. MEMORAND UM OPINION On Januar

y 14, 2005, the clerk of this court received a copy of a Notice of Ap peal filed on behalf

of appel lants Jos eph Robe rts and J & L Bail B onds. By letter da ted Janua ry 14, 2005, th e clerk

advised counsel for appellants that a filin g fee had not been received, see T EX . R. A PP . P. 5. Theclerk’s lette r likewis e advised that failure to pay the filing fee may resul t in dism issal of the appe al. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3(c ).-2-

The filing fee has not been paid. Acco rdingly, this appeal is dismi ssed. T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3(c ). James T. Campbell Justice
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4629-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2021-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Connecticut (FEMA-4629-DR), dated October 30, 2021, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued May 10, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Connecticut is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of October 30, 2021.

Middlesex County for Public Assistance.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2022-11917 Filed 6-2-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P