alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund
L.P. (the  "Partnership")  on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Daniel R. McAuliffe,  Jr., Chief Financial Officer and Director of
Smith Barney Futures Management LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Partnership.

/s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
Smith Barney Futures Management LLC
Chief Financial Officer and Director
November 14, 2002
Byron E. ADAMS, Petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 19M10

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Charles MILTON, Petitioner, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 19-7443.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 12

- 34 V

Filed: March 26, 2014

Not for P ublication

*************************************

JOYCE RUTH CULBERTSON

, *

*

Petitioner

, * Attorneys’ fees and costs decision b ased on

* s tipulation of f

act

v. *

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

*

*************************************

Larry C. Brandt

, Walhalla, SC , for petitioner.

Linda S. Renzi , Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS ’ FEES AND COSTS 1

On March 26 , 2014 , the parties filed a stipulation of fact in which they agreed on an

appropriate amount for attorneys’ fees and costs in this case

.

I n accordance with t he General Order #9 requirement, petitioner asserts t hat she incurred

no out

- of

- pocket expenses in pursuit of her petition. Petitioner submitted her request for

attorneys’ fees and costs to respondent. During informal discussions, respondent ra ised

objections t o certain items in petitioner’ s application

. Based on these objections, petitioner

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation f or the special master’ s action in this

case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal

Claims’ s website, in accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107

- 347, 116 Stat. 2899,

2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special master s will be made

available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is

privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly

unwarranted invasion of priva cy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and

move to redact such information prior to the document = s disclosure. If the special master, upon review,

agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall

redact such material from public access.2

amend s her request for reimbursement for attor neys’ fees and costs to $ 24

, 107.32

. Respondent

does not object to this amount. The undersigned finds this amount to be reasonable.

Accordingly, the court awards $ 24

, 107.32

, representing reimbursement for attorneys’ fees and

costs. The award shall be in the form of a chec k made payable jointly to petitioner and L arry C.

Brandt, P.A., in the amount of $ 24

, 107.32

.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the

court is directed to enter judgment herewith. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 26, 2014 s/ Laura D. Millman

Laura D. Millman

Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party , either separately or

jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein the Registration Statements (i) on Form S-8 (No. 333-68221) pertaining toregistration of shares under the Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation Long-TermIncentive Plan and shares under Stone Container Corporation option plansconverted to Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation shares in the mergeragreement; (ii) on Form S-8 (No. 33-57085) pertaining to registration of sharesunder the Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation 1992 Stock Option Plan; (iii) onForm S-8 (No. 333-31961) pertaining to registration of additional shares underthe Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation 1992 Stock Option Plan; (iv) on FormS-8 (No. 333-47143) pertaining to the registration of shares under the Smurfit-StoneContainer Corporation Management Incentive Plan; (v) on Form S-8 (No.333-32850) pertaining to the registration of shares under the Smurfit-StoneContainer Corporation Hourly Savings Plan, the Smurfit-Stone ContainerCorporation Savings Plan, the Jefferson Smurfit Corporation Hourly Savings Plan,and the Smurfit Packaging Corporation Savings Plan; (vi) on Form S-4 (No.333-43656) pertaining to registration of shares under the Smurfit-StoneContainer Corporation Preferred Stock Plan; (vii) on Form S-8 (No. 333-58018)pertaining to registration of shares under the St. Laurent Paperboard HourlySavings Plan; (viii) on Form S-8 (No. 333-117474) pertaining to registration ofadditional shares under the Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation 2004 Long-TermIncentive Plan and (ix) on Form S-8 (No. 333-117475) pertaining to registrationof shares under the Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation Non-Employee DirectorDeferred Compensation Plan, of our reports dated February 27, 2007, withrespect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Smurfit-StoneContainer Corporation, Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting ofSmurfit-Stone Container Corporation,  included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) forthe year ended December 31, 2006.

 

 
|                | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP |   |
|---------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                |
|                |
| St. Louis, Missouri |
| February 27, 2007   |

 

----
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/08/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       79,886
COMMITMENTS
  26,986    3,142    3,808   42,991   70,656   73,785   77,606    6,101    2,280

CHANGES FROM 10/01/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -826)
    -518       29       39      184   -1,269     -295   -1,201     -531      375

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    33.8      3.9      4.8     53.8     88.4     92.4     97.1      7.6      2.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       84)
      15        4        1       42       39       57       44
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/08/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      246,941
COMMITMENTS
  84,932   28,945    2,207  146,252  210,367  233,391  241,519   13,550    5,422

CHANGES FROM 10/01/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -2,034)
    -286    1,611      240     -933   -3,883     -979   -2,032   -1,055       -2

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    34.4     11.7      0.9     59.2     85.2     94.5     97.8      5.5      2.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      168)
      49       22       11       75       51      128       80
```

----

Updated October 28, 2013
Larry WATKINS, Sr., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7726.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Exhibit 10.19

 

AMENDMENT TO

IVAN BRAIKER’S MEMBERSHIP TO

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

OF AUGME TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

 

The Agreement dated August 25, 2011 between Ivan Braiker and Augme Technologies, Inc. (“Augme” or the “Company”) is hereby amended:

 

The language enclosed below shall be added to Mr. Braiker’s Agreement specially, under section 6 Equity:

 

·                  you will receive one-percent (1%) Transaction Fee for your participation in the realization of the monetization of the Company’s intellectual property either through: a) a settlement agreement; b) license agreement (except for licenses entered into in the ordinary course of the Company’s business); or c) asset sale during the period of directorship and extending six months thereafter.

 

IN WITTNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to Ivan Braiker’s Membership to the Board of Directors of Augme Technologies, Inc. as of November 28, 2011.

 

 

	
ACCEPTED BY:
    	
ACCEPTED   BY:
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Name: Paul Arena
    	
Name:   Ivan Braiker
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Title: Chairman
    	
Title:   Director
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TEXARKANA DIVISION

§ 

§ 

§ 

DEVONTA HENDERSON 

Plaintiff 

v. 

BOWIE COUNTY 

PROBATION, ET AL. 

Defendants 

§ 

§ 

§ Case No. 5:23cv138-RWS-JBB

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

Plaintiff Devonta Henderson, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled and numbered civil 

action complaining of alleged violations of his constitutional rights. Docket No. 7. The case 

was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636. 

On May 24, 2024, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (“Report”), 

recommending the above lawsuit be dismissed with prejudice to the claims being asserted again until 

such time as Plaintiff can show that the conviction resulting from the arrest complained of has been 

overturned, expunged by executive order, declared invalid in a state collateral proceeding, or called 

into question through the issuance of a federal writ of habeas corpus. Docket No. 11. 

Plaintiff acknowledged receipt of the Report on or before May 28, 2024, but has not filed 

objections. Docket No. 12. Accordingly, Plaintiff is barred from de novo review by the District 

Judge of those findings, conclusions, and recommendations and, except upon grounds of plain 

error, from appellate review of the unobjected-to factual findings and legal conclusions 

accepted and adopted by the District Court. Duarte v. City of Lewisville, Texas, 858 F.3d 348, 

352 (5th Cir. 2017); Arriaga v. Laxminarayan, Case No. 4:21-CV-00203-RAS, 2021 WL 

3287683, at *1 (E.D. Tex. July 31, 2021). 

The Court has reviewed the pleadings in this case and the Report of the Magistrate Judge. 

Upon such review, the Court has determined that the Report of the Magistrate Judge is correct. 

See United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918, 109 S.Ct. 

3243 (1989) (where no objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Report are filed, the standard of 

review is “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law.”). Accordingly, it is

Case 5:23-cv-00138-RWS-JBB Document 13 Filed 08/06/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 36
Page 2 of 2

ORDERED that the May 24, 2024 Report of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 11) is

ADOPTED as the opinion of the District Court. It is further 

ORDERED that the above-styled civil action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE to the 

claims being asserted again until such time as Plaintiff can show that the conviction resulting 

from the arrest complained of has been overturned, expunged by executive order, declared 

invalid in a state collateral proceeding, or called into question through the issuance of a federal 

writ of habeas corpus. 

.

 

____________________________________

ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 6th day of August, 2024.

Case 5:23-cv-00138-RWS-JBB Document 13 Filed 08/06/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 37
# C_2017145EN.01000901.xml

| 9.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 145/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 145/9

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 145/10)

| Member State | Italy |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Olbia-Rome Fiumicino and vice versa |
| Period of validity of the contract | A period of four years starting on 27 October 2017 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | Two months after the date of publication of this notice |
| Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained | For further information:





  Autonomous Region of Sardinia |
| Department of Transport |
| Directorate-General for Transport |
| Service for Maritime and Air Transport and Territorial Continuity |
| Via XXIX Novembre 1847, 41 |
| 09123 Cagliari |
| ITALIA |
| Tel. +39 0706067331 |
| Fax +39 0706067309 |
| Website: http://www.regione.sardegna.it |
| Email | : | trasporti@pec.regione.sardegna.it
  trasporti@regione.sardegna.it
  trasp.osp@regione.sardegna.it |

Member State

Italy

Route concerned

Olbia-Rome Fiumicino and vice versa

Period of validity of the contract

A period of four years starting on 27 October 2017

Deadline for submission of tenders

Two months after the date of publication of this notice

Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained

For further information:

Autonomous Region of Sardinia

Department of Transport

Directorate-General for Transport

Service for Maritime and Air Transport and Territorial Continuity

Via XXIX Novembre 1847, 41

09123 Cagliari

ITALIA

Tel. +39 0706067331

Fax +39 0706067309

Website: http://www.regione.sardegna.it

Email

:

trasporti@pec.regione.sardegna.it

trasporti@regione.sardegna.it

trasp.osp@regione.sardegna.it

---
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 483 

Commending efforts to promote and enhance public safety on the need for 

yellow corrugated stainless steel tubing bonding. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 6, 2012 

Mr. PRYOR (for himself and Ms. AYOTTE) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JULY 17, 2012 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Commending efforts to promote and enhance public safety 

on the need for yellow corrugated stainless steel tubing 

bonding. 

Whereas yellow corrugated stainless steel tubing (referred to 

in this preamble as ‘‘CSST’’) is flexible gas piping used 

to convey natural gas or propane to household appliances 

in homes and businesses; 

Whereas since 1990, yellow CSST has been installed in more 

than 6,000,000 homes and businesses in the United 

States; 

Whereas field reports and research suggest that if direct or 

indirect lightning strikes a structure, the risk for electrical arcing between the metal components in a structure 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 483 ATS 

with yellow CSST may be reduced by means of 

equipotential bonding and grounding; 

Whereas proper bonding of CSST is defined in section 7.13.2 

of the 2009 edition of the NFPA 54: National Fuel Gas 

Code, and is referenced in info note 2 in section 250.104 

of the 2011 edition of the NFPA 70: National Electric 

Code; 

Whereas the National Association of State Fire Marshals 

supports the proper bonding of yellow CSST to current 

National Fire Protection Association Code to reduce the 

possibility of gas leaks and fires from lightning strikes; 

Whereas the National Association of State Fire Marshals is 

working to educate relevant stakeholders, including fire, 

building, and housing officials, consumers, homeowners, 

and construction professionals about the need to properly 

bond yellow CSST in legacy installations and in all new 

installations in accordance with the most recent building 

codes and manufacturer installation instructions; 

Whereas the bonding of yellow CSST in legacy installations 

is an important public safety matter that merits alerting 

homeowners, relevant State and local fire, building, and 

housing officials, and construction professionals such as 

electricians, contractors, plumbers, inspectors, and homeimprovement specialists: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) commends efforts to promote and enhance 

3 public safety and consumer awareness on proper 

4 bonding of yellow corrugated stainless steel tubing 

5 (referred to in this resolution as ‘‘CSST’’) as defined 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

SRES 483 ATS 

1 in the National Fire Protection Association Code; 

2 and 

3 (2) encourages further educational efforts for 

4 the public, relevant building and housing officials, 

5 consumers, homeowners, and construction profes6 sionals on the need to properly bond yellow CSST 

7 retroactively and moving forward in houses that con8 tain the product. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>
                                  Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Environmental  Service
Professionals,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form  10-QSB/A for the period  ending
September 30, 2007 (the "Report") I, Edward L. Torres,  Chief Executive Officer,
and  President  of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated:  May 9, 2008


\s\ Edward L. Torres
------------------------------------------------------
Edward L. Torres, Chief Executive Officer and President

         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Robert A. COTTON, petitioner, v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, et al.

No. 18-5783.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Donald J. TRUMP, Petitioner, v. Cyrus R. VANCE, Jr., in His Official Capacity as District Attorney of the County of New York, et al.

No. 19-635.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted.
FST-03.31.2012-EX-10.6




AMENDMENT TO SEVERANCE AGREEMENT
THIS AMENDMENT TO SEVERANCE AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is made this ___ day of _________, 2010, by and between Forest Oil Corporation, a New York corporation (the “Company”), and ___________________ (“Executive”).  
WHEREAS, the Company and Executive have heretofore entered into that certain Severance Agreement dated ______________, _______ (as may have been amended from time to time, the “Severance Agreement”); 
WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee has extended the term of the Severance Agreement to December 17, 2012; and
WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend the Severance Agreement in certain respects in order to comply with new guidance promulgated by the Internal Revenue Service under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises set forth above and the mutual agreements set forth herein, the Company and Executive hereby agree that the Severance Agreement shall be amended as hereafter provided, effective as of the date first set forth above:
1.    The first sentence of Paragraph 3(a) of the Severance Agreement shall be deleted and the following shall be substituted therefor:
“Pay Executive the Monthly Severance Amount on the first day of each month throughout the Severance Period; provided, however, that (i) the first such payment shall be made on the date that is 60 days after the date of Executive’s Involuntary Termination and shall include all payments that would have otherwise been made during the first 60 days after such termination if this clause (i) did not apply and (ii) in the event that Executive obtains new employment during the Severance Period, each such monthly payment shall be reduced by 50% beginning with the payment next due after the date Executive obtains such new employment.”
2.    As amended hereby, the Severance Agreement is specifically ratified and reaffirmed.
[Signatures begin on the following page.]





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this Amendment effective as herein provided.
	
				
	FOREST OIL CORPORATION
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	By:
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Name:
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Title:
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 

	EXECUTIVE