alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan Sub-Plan Governing Purchase Rights...



 EXHIBIT 10.14C 

JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS PLC 

2007 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN 

SUB-PLAN GOVERNING PURCHASE RIGHTS TO PARTICIPANTS IN THE REPUBLIC OF IRELAND 

1 General 
  

	1.1	In accordance with Rule 2(b)(viii) of the 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“the Plan”) the Committee has determined to establish this sub-plan
(“the Irish Sub-Plan”) for the purposes of Eligible Employees who are resident in the Republic of Ireland. 

  

	1.2	All terms that are not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Plan. 


2 Terms of Irish Sub-Plan 
 The Plan
shall be amended as follows. 
 2.1 Eligibility 
 Rule 5(a) shall be deleted and replaced with the following: 
 (a) Purchase Rights
may be granted only to Employees of the Company or, as the Board may designate as provided in Section 2(b), to Employees of a Related Corporation. Except as provided in Section 5(b), an Employee shall not be eligible to be granted Purchase
Rights under the Plan unless, on the Offering Date, such Employee has been in the employ of the Company or the Related Corporation, as the case may be, for such continuous period preceding such Offering Date as the Board may require, but in no event
shall the required period of continuous employment be greater than two (2) years. 
 2.2 Transferability of Purchase Rights

 Rule 7(d) shall be deleted and replaced with the following: 
 (d) Purchase Rights shall not be transferable by a Participant except by will or the laws of descent and distribution. During a Participant’s lifetime, Purchase Rights shall be exercisable only by
such Participant. 
 Rule 10 shall be deleted. 
 2.3 Employment or Other Service Rights; Compensation 
 Rule 11(a) shall be deleted and
replaced with the following: 
 (a) The Plan and Offering do not constitute an employment contract. Nothing in the Plan or in the
Offering shall in any way alter the nature of a Participant’s employment or be deemed to create in any way whatsoever any 







 
obligation on the part of any Participant to continue in the employ of the Company or a Related Corporation, or on the part of the Company or a Related Corporation to continue the employment of a
Participant (subject to applicable law). A Participant shall not be entitled to any compensation or damages whatsoever or howsoever described, by reason of any termination, withdrawal or alteration of rights or expectations under the Plan whether
such compensation is claimed by way of damages for wrongful dismissal or other breach of contract or by way of compensation for loss of office or otherwise howsoever.
Naora BEN-DOV, Petitioner v. Shoshana Zelda SRAGOW, aka Stacy Suzanna Sragow, et al.

No. 19-179

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF EARNINGS FOR THE SIX MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             353
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      794
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,661
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,501
<PP&E>                                           3,438
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,939
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,727
<BONDS>                                          1,235
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,278
<OTHER-SE>                                    (20,900)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,939
<SALES>                                          1,074
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,074
<CGS>                                            1,823
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,823
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 771
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,638)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,638)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,638)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.59)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       5,910,000
<SECURITIES>                                 7,473,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               26,354,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,833,000
<INVENTORY>                                 44,940,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            85,695,000
<PP&E>                                      17,921,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             104,059,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       44,261,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  59,783,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               104,059,000
<SALES>                                    100,935,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           106,650,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              109,702,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             148,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,677,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,677,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,677,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.18)
        

</TABLE>
George D. PREWITT, Petitioner, v. David J. SHULKIN, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

No. 17-92

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 2, 2017

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 06/04/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      372,793
COMMITMENTS
  92,246  163,882   90,181  152,913   88,387  335,340  342,450   37,453   30,343

CHANGES FROM 05/28/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -16,594)
  -6,004    3,946   -1,160  -14,413  -15,366  -21,577  -12,580    4,983   -4,014

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    24.7     44.0     24.2     41.0     23.7     90.0     91.9     10.0      8.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      167)
      51       69       71       34       32      126      140
```

----

Updated June 7, 2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                           6,453
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,242
<ALLOWANCES>                                       470
<INVENTORY>                                     61,068
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                90,399
<PP&E>                                          91,339
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,618
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 156,946
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,208
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           108
<OTHER-SE>                                      92,802
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   156,946
<SALES>                                        196,984
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               196,984
<CGS>                                          134,214
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  134,214
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                56,262
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  46
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,462
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,398
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,064
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    254
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,810
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.34


</TABLE>
Keith TALBERT, Petitioner v. ILLINOIS.

No. 18-9768

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
exhibit10-6.htm









Exhibit 10.6





Confidential Materials omitted and filed separately with the


Securities and Exchange Commission. Asterisks denote omissions.




AMENDMENT TO


CONSULTING AGREEMENT







This Amendment to Consulting Agreement (the “Amendment”) is effective as of January 1, 2012 (the “Effective Date”) by and between Emergent BioSolutions Inc. (“Emergent”), with a principal office at 2273 Research Blvd. Suite 400 Rockville, MD 20850, and Robert Kramer (“Consultant”), with a principal office at 6872 Oleander Lane Portage, MI 49024.







WHEREAS, Emergent and Consultant executed a Consulting Agreement effective as of September 6, 2011 (the “Agreement”); and







WHEREAS, Emergent and Consultant desire to amend the Agreement as set forth herein; and


 

 


WHEREAS, the 2012 Project Focus set forth under the Description of Services on the Work Order attached to the Agreement as Exhibit A states that goals will be agreed by all parties; and







WHEREAS, Emergent and Consultant have now come to an agreement on the goals to be included in the 2012 Project Focus.







NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties, intending to be bound, agree as follows:







1.           Amendments.








	
a.  

	
The Description of Services set forth in the Work Order attached to the Agreement as Exhibit A be and hereby is amended to reflect the 2012 Project Focus set forth on Schedule 1 attached to this Amendment.












2.           No further Amendments.  Except for those amendments and modifications specifically set forth above, the Agreement is not being modified or amended in any way.








	
EMERGENT BIOSOLUTIONS INC.


 


 


By:/s/Daniel J. Abdun-Nabi


Name:Daniel J. Abdun-Nabi


 


Title:President and CEO

	
Robert Kramer


 


 


By:/s/Robert G. Kramer


 


Name:Robert G. Kramer


 


Title:__________________________





















  





  











  













SCHEDULE 1







to


AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT


between


EMERGENT BIOSOLUTIONS INC. AND ROBERT KRAMER







Description of Services:












[**]
Benito RIVERA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9799.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Bobby BORDELON, Petitioner v. TEXAS.

No. 18-9686

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of Brightpoint, Inc.'s (the "Company") Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 (the "Report"), I,
Anthony W. Boor, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                  /s/ Anthony W. Boor
                                  -----------------------------------------
                                  Anthony W. Boor
                                  Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
                                  Officer and Treasurer

Date: February 22, 2007
Reggie D. CASWELL, Petitioner v. NEW YORK

No. 19-6160

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

The petition for rehearing is denied.
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION 

THE DAILY WIRE, LLC et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT 

OF STATE et al., 

 Defendants. 

 Civil Action No. 6:23-cv-00609 (JDK) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Upon consideration of Defendants’ Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages, it is 

hereby: 

ORDERED that Defendants’ motion is GRANTED. 

Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 44-1 Filed 04/17/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1747
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 01/29/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      663,432
COMMITMENTS
  69,929   50,454  192,640  381,220  400,352  643,790  643,446   19,643   19,986

CHANGES FROM 01/22/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     44,350)
  -6,979    6,853   16,705   36,062   23,033   45,788   46,590   -1,439   -2,241

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    10.5      7.6     29.0     57.5     60.3     97.0     97.0      3.0      3.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      156)
      38       41       62       66       63      140      135
```

----

Updated February 1, 2013
Douglas Edwin BALL, Jr., Petitioner, v. MICHIGAN.

No. 19-7475.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 32 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the National Honor Guard 

and Pipe Band Exhibition. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 18, 2013 

Mr. BARLETTA (for himself and Ms. NORTON) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the National 

Honor Guard and Pipe Band Exhibition. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF THE CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NA4 TIONAL HONOR GUARD AND PIPE BAND EX5 HIBITION. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Grand Lodge of the Fra7 ternal Order of Police and its auxiliary (in this resolution 

8 referred to as the ‘‘sponsor’’) shall be permitted to sponsor 

9 a public event, the National Honor Guard and Pipe Band 

10 Exhibition (in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘event’’), 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 32 IH 

1 on the Capitol Grounds, in order to allow law enforcement 

2 representatives to exhibit their ability to demonstrate 

3 Honor Guard programs and provide for a bag pipe exhi4 bition. 

5 (b) DATE OF EVENT.—The event shall be held on 

6 May 14, 2013, or on such other date as the Speaker of 

7 the House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules 

8 and Administration of the Senate jointly designate. 

9 SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS. 

10 (a) IN GENERAL.—Under conditions to be prescribed 

11 by the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police 

12 Board, the event shall be— 

13 (1) free of admission charge and open to the 

14 public; and 

15 (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of 

16 Congress. 

17 (b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—The sponsor shall 

18 assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities 

19 incident to all activities associated with the event. 

20 SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS. 

21 Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Cap22 itol, the sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol 

23 Grounds such stage, sound amplification devices, and 

24 other related structures and equipment, as may be re25 quired for the event. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HCON 32 IH 

1 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

2 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce3 ment of the restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of 

4 title 40, United States Code, concerning sales, advertise5 ments, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, 

6 as well as other restrictions applicable to the Capitol 

7 Grounds, in connection with the event. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Augustin ZAMBRANO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES

No. 18-1507

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          26,336
<SECURITIES>                                         3
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,924
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,138
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,395
<PP&E>                                           1,933
<DEPRECIATION>                                     980
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  68,057
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,736
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           503
<OTHER-SE>                                      58,415
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    68,057
<SALES>                                          6,411
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,444
<CGS>                                              195
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,744
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,272
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  11
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,386)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,386)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,386)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)


</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 7111

EDDIE C. YOUNG, JR. , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. AJ DEANGELIS, Police Officer of V.B. 4th precinct , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Raymond A. Jackson , District Judge. ( 2:18

- cv
- 00203

- RAJ

- LRL )

Submitted : November 29, 2018 Decided: December 4, 2018

Before DUNCAN and KEENAN , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Eddie C. Young, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Eddie C. Young, Jr., appeals the dis trict court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action for failure either to pay the filing fee or to submit a
fee collection form

. Because the court dismissed Young’s action “for procedural reasons
unrelated to the contents o f the pleadings,” we have jurisdiction over this appeal. Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc. , 807 F.3d 619, 624 (4th Cir. 2015) . However, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
Because Young ’ s i nformal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Young has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”) . Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conte ntions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED