alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- 1 -

No. 6:24-cr-00006-1

United States of America

v.

Drew Quinton Clark

ORDER

The court referred this matter to United States Magistrate 

Judge John D. Love for administration of a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The magistrate judge conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 

and issued findings of fact and recommendation on guilty plea. 

Doc. 70. The magistrate judge recommended the court accept defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge defendant guilty on count five

of the indictment. Id. at 2. Defendant waived his right to object to 

the magistrate judge’s findings. Id.

The court hereby accepts the findings of fact and recommendation on guilty plea of the United States Magistrate Judge. The 

court also accepts defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the 

plea agreement until after review of the presentence report.

In accordance with defendant’s guilty plea, the court finds defendant Drew Quinton Clark (1) guilty of count five of the indictment, charging a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) – Possession 

with the Intent to Distribute Methamphetamine.

So ordered by the court on September 24, 2024.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:24-cr-00006-JCB-JDL Document 73 Filed 09/24/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 189
**Exhibit 31.1 —  Certification of Chief Executive Officer  —  Sarbanes-OxleySection 302**
I, Darryl W. Thompson, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Triad GuarantyInc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisannual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based upon such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors:
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
November 5, 2004    /s/ Darryl W. Thompson  Darryl W. Thompson President, Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

EMERGING AUTOMOTIVE LLC,

Plaintiff,

v. 

KIA CORPORATION, KIA AMERICA, 

INC.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00437-JRG

ORDER

Before the Court is the Joint Motion for Extension of Time for Defendants to Move, 

Answer, or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff’s Original Complaint (the “Joint Motion”) filed by 

Plaintiff Emerging Automotive LLC (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Kia Corporation and Kia 

America, Inc. (“Defendants”) (collectively, the “Parties”). (Dkt. No. 12). In the Joint Motion, the 

Parties request an extension of time for Defendants to move, answer, or otherwise respond to 

Plaintiff’s Complaint (Dkt. No. 1). (Dkt. No. 12 at 1). The requested extension would move the 

deadline for Defendants to move, answer, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint up to and 

including January 10, 2024. (Id.).

Having considered the Joint Motion, the Court finds that it should be and hereby is 

GRANTED. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that the deadline for Defendants to move, answer, 

or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint is extended up to and including January 10, 2024.

.

____________________________________

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 17th day of October, 2023.

Case 2:23-cv-00437-JRG Document 13 Filed 10/17/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 388
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EL22-41-000]

On Thursday, June 2, 2022, Commission staff will hold a conference call with Puget Sound Energy, Inc. (Puget Sound) beginning at 11:00 a.m. (Eastern Time). The purpose of the conference call is to discuss Puget Sound's formula rate protocols. The discussion during the conference call will be limited to this matter.

                    All interested parties are invited to listen by phone. The conference call will not be webcasted or transcribed. However, an audio listen-only line will be provided. Those wishing to access the listen-only line must email Patricia Dalton at                     *patricia.dalton@ferc.gov*                     by 5:00 p.m. (Eastern Time) on Tuesday, May 31, 2022, with your name, email, and phone number, in order to receive the call-in information before the conference call. Please use the following text for the subject line, “EL22-41-000 listen-only line registration.”                

                    Commission conferences are accessible under section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations, please send an email to                     *accessibility@ferc.gov*                     or call toll free 1 (866) 208-3372 (voice) or (202) 208-1659 (TTY), or send a FAX to (202) 208-2106 with the required accommodations.                

                    For additional information, please contact Patricia Dalton at (202) 502-8044 or                     *patricia.dalton@ferc.gov.*

Dated: May 24, 2022.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-11625 Filed 5-27-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION—CEO

 

In connection with the Annual Report of J.B. Poindexter & Co., Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John B. Poindexter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

To the best of my knowledge, after reasonable investigation:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:   June 15, 2011 | By                                           | /s/   John B. Poindexter |
|----------------------------|----------------------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                       | John   B. Poindexter, Chairman of the Board, |
|                       | President   and Chief Executive Officer      |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

SARAH CARTEE

v. 

BBK BUSINESS, LLC, ET AL.

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL NO. 4:24-CV-50-SDJ

NOTICE OF IMPENDING DISMISSAL

More than ninety (90) days have passed since the filing of the Complaint in 

this Court on January 19, 2024. According to the records before the Court, Defendants 

Bijaya Bhusal and Dirga Kandel have not yet been served. This notice therefore 

serves to inform Plaintiff that this action shall be dismissed without prejudice as to 

Defendants Bijaya Bhusal and Dirga Kandel—in accordance with Federal Rule of 

Civil Procedure 4(m), as amended effective October 14, 2021—unless Plaintiff 

provides the Court by August 7, 2024, with proof that service was rendered within 

ninety (90) days of the Complaint’s filing. 

Alternatively, if more than ninety (90) days are necessary for service of process, 

Plaintiff must, to avoid dismissal under Rule 4(m), execute a verified petition 

regarding service of process, advising the Court:

A. That the case should not be dismissed as to the unserved Defendants

B. That the failure to obtain service upon Defendants is not due to the fault 

of the Party seeking to avoid dismissal;

C. The reasons why the case against the unserved Defendants should not 

be dismissed, set forth in detail and demonstrating good cause; and

Case 4:24-cv-00050-SDJ Document 7 Filed 07/25/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 19
2

D. That service will be effected on Defendants within thirty (30) days of the 

date of the petition.

The verified petition must be filed with the Court on or before August 7, 2024. 

If the Court is satisfied that the case should not be dismissed as to the unserved 

Defendants, Plaintiff will be so notified. If dismissal of the case as to the unserved 

Defendants is satisfactory to the Plaintiff, no action is required. By executing the 

petition regarding service of process, Plaintiff need not appear in support thereof 

until and/or unless so notified by the Court. Failure to respond will result in dismissal 

of this case for failure to prosecute.

Case 4:24-cv-00050-SDJ Document 7 Filed 07/25/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 20
Jonathan CRUPI, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK.

No. 19-8194.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 26, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department denied.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 11/05/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      389,521
COMMITMENTS
 120,111  162,019   88,290  158,438  114,128  366,839  364,437   22,682   25,084

CHANGES FROM 10/29/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     27,031)
  14,894   17,129    6,956    3,944    4,406   25,794   28,491    1,237   -1,460

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    30.8     41.6     22.7     40.7     29.3     94.2     93.6      5.8      6.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      180)
      55       70       76       32       37      132      151
```

----

Updated November 8, 2013
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 573 

Designating the third week of January 2013 as ‘‘Teen Cancer Awareness 

Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2012 

Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself, Mr. TOOMEY, and Mr. CASEY) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

DECEMBER 5, 2012 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the third week of January 2013 as ‘‘Teen 

Cancer Awareness Week’’. 

Whereas cancer among adolescents is rare, but is still the 

leading cause of death from disease for teenagers between 

the ages of 15 and 19; 

Whereas teenage cancer patients receive treatment at various 

types of medical establishments, including pediatric hospitals, pediatric oncology centers, and adult cancer facilities; 

Whereas teenage cancer patients may feel out of place in any 

of these settings if their clinical and psychosocial needs 

are not met; 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

SRES 573 ATS 

Whereas 40 percent of cancer patients aged 14 and younger 

are enrolled in clinical trials, compared with only 9 percent of cancer patients between the ages of 15 and 24; 

Whereas teenagers with cancer have unique concerns about 

their education, social lives, body image, and infertility, 

among other concerns, and their needs may be misunderstood or unacknowledged; 

Whereas many adolescent cancer survivors have difficulty readjusting to school and social settings, experience anxiety, and in some cases face increased learning difficulties; and 

Whereas it is important to understand the biological and clinical needs of teenagers with cancer, seek the prevention 

of cancer in teenagers, and increase awareness in the 

general public of the unique challenges facing teenagers 

with cancer: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates the third week 

2 of January 2013 as ‘‘Teen Cancer Awareness Week’’ to 

3 promote awareness of teenage cancer and the unique med4 ical and social needs of teenagers with cancer. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
EXHIBIT 3

PLAINTIFFS’ SUR-REPLY IN SUPPORT OF 

PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 

FED. R. CIV. P. 12(B)(2)

PUBLIC VERSION

Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 55-3 Filed 08/22/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 973
Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 55-3 Filed 08/22/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 974
Monette E. SACCAMENO, Petitioner, v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, et al.

No. 19-1120.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Jerome SHAW, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7624.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 10/22/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       80,441
COMMITMENTS
  26,642    2,665    3,766   43,850   71,693   74,258   78,124    6,183    2,317

CHANGES FROM 10/15/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,244)
   1,410     -485        2      -18    1,682    1,394    1,199     -150       45

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    33.1      3.3      4.7     54.5     89.1     92.3     97.1      7.7      2.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       88)
      17        5        1       42       40       59       46
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 10/22/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      267,747
COMMITMENTS
  89,432   35,823    1,080  163,550  226,267  254,062  263,170   13,685    4,577

CHANGES FROM 10/15/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -978)
   2,038   -3,507        3   -1,770    5,293      271    1,789   -1,249   -2,767

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    33.4     13.4      0.4     61.1     84.5     94.9     98.3      5.1      1.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      181)
      54       22       10       79       56      139       82
```

----

Updated November 1, 2013
# C_2017089EN.01001901.xml

| 22.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/19

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/491, concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Egypt apply

(2017/C 89/04)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 (2) as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/491 (3).

2

3

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 270/2011, as implemented by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/491.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with Section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (4).

4

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 4.

2

(3)  OJ L 76, 22.3.2017, p. 10.

3

(4)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

4

---
# C_2017439EN.01001201.xml

| 20.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 439/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 439/12

---

Notice concerning a request pursuant to Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU

Request made by a Member State — Extension of the period for adoption of implementing acts

(2017/C 439/08)

On 2 November 2016 the Commission received a request in accordance with Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (1).

1

This request, from the Czech Republic, concerns certain activities in the market for retail of electricity and gas in the Czech Republic.

The relevant notice was published on page 10 of OJ C 23 on 24 January 2017. Two prolongation notices were published on page 10 of OJ C 167 on 25 May 2017 and on page 4 of OJ C 276 on 19 August 2017. A suspension notice was published on page 18 of OJ C 396 of 23 November 2017.

Pursuant to the fourth subparagraph of paragraph 1 to Annex IV of Directive 2014/25/EU, the deadline may be extended by the Commission with the agreement of those having made the request for exemption concerned. Given the request by the Applicant for additional time in order to provide additional information to substantiate the case and with the agreement of Commission, the period available to the Commission for deciding on this request is hereby extended until 31 March 2018.

---

(1)  Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC (OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 243).

1

---