alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 The HONORABLE DAVID S. DOTY, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 02-2357

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * District of Minnesota. * Ramon Calles-Abrego, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: December 4, 2002 Filed: December 12, 2002

___________ Before LOKEN, FAGG, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Ramon Calles-Abrego pleaded guilty to one count of possessing with intent to distribute more than 50 grams of a substance containing cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A). The district court 1 sentenced him to 120 months imprisonment (the statutory minimum) and 5 years supervised release. The courtimposed, as a special condition of supervised release, the requirement that CallesAbrego comply with Immigration and Naturalization Service rules and not reenter the United States illegally, and report to the nearest U.S. Probation Office within 72-2- hours of any reentry during his supervised release. On appeal, counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief in conformance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the 120-month sentence was unreasonable and the supervised-release condition violated Calles-Abrego’s Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. As neither of these arguments was raised below, our review is for plain error. See United States v. Sun Bear , 307 F.3d 747, 750 (8th Cir. 2002). We conclude that the district court did not plainly err in imposing the 120- month sentence, because the unobjected-to drug quantity in the presentence report required imposition of the 10-year statutory minimum. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A);U.S.S.G. § 5G1.1(c)(2). Nor did the court plainly err in imposing the supervisedrelease condition. See United States v. Aguilar , 129 F.3d 122, 1997 WL 636619 (8th Cir. Oct. 10, 1997) (unpublished per curiam) (finding no plain error in imposition of same supervised-release condition). Moreover, having reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Alex PENLAND, Petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 19-7982.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Hamilton County denied.
**Exhibit99.1**

 

# **CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SteinwayMusical Instruments, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 29, 2002 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, DanaD. Messina, Chief Executive Officer and Dennis M. Hanson, the Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company hereby certify that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 

 

 
| /s/ Dana D. Messina     |   | /s/ Dennis M. Hanson    |
|-------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
| Dana D. Messina         |   | Dennis M. Hanson        |
| Chief Executive Officer |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

 

Date:   August 9, 2002

 

 

----
Devell MOORE, Petitioner, v. Robert LEGRAND, Warden, et al.

No. 19-7108

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

NATHANIEL JONES, III, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23-CV-221

§

J. BACK, et al., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Nathaniel Jones, III, an inmate confined at the Wainwright Unit of the Texas

Department of Criminal Justice, CorrectionalInstitutions Division, proceeding pro se, brought this

lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine

L. Stetson, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to

applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge recommends dismissing the action

without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and sanctions imposed by the United States

District Court for the Western District of Texas. To date, the parties have not filed objections to

the report.

The court received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available

evidence. After careful review, the court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of

the United States Magistrate Judge are correct.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is

ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate

judge’s recommendation.

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 25th day of January, 2024.

Case 9:23-cv-00221-MAC-CLS Document 5 Filed 01/25/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 51
Coree PATRICK, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7797

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
IN RE Frank DEVILLE, Petitioner.

No. 19-7756.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 27, 2020

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until May 18, 2020, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a).
I, Jeffrey I. Friedman, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2004 of Associated Estates Realty Corporation;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the
audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: November 2, 2004		/s/ Jeffrey I. Friedman

Jeffrey I. Friedman, Chief Executive Officer

G:\2004Q\3q04\jif302ce.wpd
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

BISHOP DISPLAY TECH LLC, 

Plaintiff,

v. 

LG ELECTRONICS INC., et al.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-cv-00084-JRG

(LEAD CASE)

BISHOP DISPLAY TECH LLC, 

Plaintiff,

v. 

LG ELECTRONICS INC., et al.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-cv-00085-JRG

(MEMBER CASE)

ORDER 

Before the Court is the Joint Motion to Extend Stay (the “Motion”) filed by Plaintiff Bishop 

Display Tech LLC and Defendants LG Electronics Inc., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., and LG 

Display Co., Ltd. (the “Parties”) (Dkt. No. 70). In the Motion, the parties request additional time 

to finalize the settlement agreement and corresponding settlement documents. (Id. at 1.) The 

parties request an extension of the stay by thirty 30) days, up to and including December 27, 2024. 

(Id.) 

Having considered the Motion, and noting its joint nature, the Court finds that it should be 

and hereby is GRANTED. Accordingly, all deadlines in the above-captioned case are STAYED 

up to and including December 27, 2024, during which time appropriate dismissal papers are to be 

filed with the Court.

Case 2:24-cv-00084-JRG Document 71 Filed 12/03/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 612
____________________________________

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 2nd day of December, 2024.

Case 2:24-cv-00084-JRG Document 71 Filed 12/03/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 613
# C_2017169EN.01000401.xml

| 30.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 169/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 169/4

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2010/788/CFSP, as implemented by Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2017/905 and Council Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/904 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo

(2017/C 169/05)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2017/905 (1) and in the Annex to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/904 (2) concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

1

2

The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons that appear in the abovementioned Annexes should be included in the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2010/788/CFSP (3) and in Council Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 (4) concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The grounds for designations of those persons appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

3

4

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the web-sites in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 3 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council before 1 October 2017, together with supporting documentation that the decision to include them on the abovementioned list should be reconsidered to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council’s next review, pursuant to Article 9(2) of Decision 2010/788/CFSP.

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ LI 138, 29.5.2017, p. 6.

1

(2)  OJ LI 138, 29.5.2017, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 336, 21.12.2010, p. 30.

3

(4)  OJ L 193, 23.7.2005, p. 1.

4

---
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 01/22/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      184,943
COMMITMENTS
  37,519   23,692   27,927   98,292  105,510  163,737  157,128   21,206   27,815

CHANGES FROM 01/15/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,071)
    -628      191       65    2,304    4,169    1,741    4,425      330   -2,355

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    20.3     12.8     15.1     53.1     57.0     88.5     85.0     11.5     15.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      183)
      51       38       41       65       77      135      139
```

----

Updated January 25, 2013
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with the Quarterly Report of Avondale Incorporated (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 28, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jack R. Altherr, Jr.,
Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date: July 8, 2004                             /s/ JACK R. ALTHERR, JR.
                                               ------------------------
                                               Jack R. Altherr, Jr.
                                               Vice Chairman and Chief
                                                  Financial Officer
Bobbie BATTLES, Petitioner, v. Daryl ROTZ, et al.

No. 19M25

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari out of time under Rule 14.5 denied.
Roderick JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. Denise MORGAN, Warden, et al.

No. 19M131.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 27, 2020

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., petitioner, v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, et al.

No. 18-612.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

The Solicitor General is invited to file brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 1, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 33152]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11801]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK


Sunshine Act Meetings Notice of Open Meeting of the Sub-Saharan 
Africa Advisory Committee of the Export-Import Bank of the United 
States (EXIM)

TIME AND DATE: Monday, June 13th, 2022, from 10:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m. ET.

PLACE: Hybrid meeting--811 Vermont Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20571 and 
Virtual. The meeting will be conducted in person for committee members, 
EXIM's Board of Directors, and support staff, and virtually for all 
other participants.

STATUS: Virtual Public Participation: The meeting will be open to 
public participation virtually and time will be allotted for questions 
or comments submitted online. Members of the public may also file 
written statements before or after the meeting to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ddb8a5a9b8afb3bcb19db8a5b4b0f3bab2ab"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="43263b3726312d222f03263b2a2e6d242c35">[email protected]</span></a>. 
Interested parties may register for the meeting at: https://teams.microsoft.com/registration/PAFTuZHHMk2Zb1GDkIVFJw,5M1LfonJMEi2VFUgYRv6oQ,i145n2l9vkmDj5btNlkuGw,8rb_9sSaCEGH4WHtr4cqpg,G7ibD_7kR0qIRk59N8Khmw,yXCBkryUB0OxZTf2xcPoOw?mode=read&tenantId=b953013c-c791-4d32-996f-518390854527.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Discussion of EXIM policies and programs 
designed to support the expansion of financing support for U.S. 
manufactured goods and services in Sub-Saharan Africa.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information, contact 
India Walker, External Enagagement Specialist, at 202-480-0062 or at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b8d1d6dcd1d996cfd9d4d3ddcaf8ddc0d1d596dfd7ce"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5930373d3038772e3835323c2b193c213034773e362f">[email protected]</span></a>.

Joyce B. Stone,
Assistant Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-11801 Filed 5-27-22; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, William Dean Singleton, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of MediaNews Group, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: September 28, 2007     /S/William Dean Singleton    William Dean Singleton   Vice Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Bartholomew Antonio GUZMAN, Petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 19-7406.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Enrique AUCH, Petitioner, v. MASSACHUSETTS.

No. 19-7932.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts denied.
# C_2017085EN.01000701.xml

| 18.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 85/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 85/7

---

Notice of request concerning the applicability of Article 34 of Directive 2014/25/EU

Request made by a contracting entity

(2017/C 85/06)

On 30 January 2017 the Commission received a request pursuant to Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC (1). The first working day following receipt of the request is 31 January 2017.

1

This request, made by Eneco BV, NV Nuon Energy and DONG Energy A/S, concerns production and wholesale of electricity in the Netherlands.

Article 34 of Directive 2014/25/EU provides that ‘contracts intended to enable an activity mentioned in Articles 8 to 14 to be carried out shall not be subject to this Directive if the Member State or the contracting entities having introduced the request pursuant to Article 35 can demonstrate that, in the Member State in which it is performed, the activity is directly exposed to competition on markets to which access is not restricted; nor shall design contests that are organised for the pursuit of such an activity in that geographic area be subject to this Directive.’ The assessment of direct exposure to competition that can be carried out in the context of Directive 2014/25/EU is without prejudice to the full-fledged application of competition law.

The Commission is allowed a period of 105 working days to take a decision on this request, commencing on the working day referred to above. The period therefore expires on 6 July 2017.

According to Article 35(5) of Directive 2014/25/EU, further requests concerning production and wholesale of electricity in the Netherlands, before the expiry of the period opened in respect of this request, shall not be considered as new procedures and shall be treated in the context of this request.

---

(1)  OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 243.

1

---