alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/01/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      161,205
COMMITMENTS
  52,907   25,401   19,302   69,497   91,884  141,706  136,587   19,499   24,618

CHANGES FROM 09/24/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      5,408)
   1,447   -8,990      -74    2,982   14,042    4,355    4,978    1,053      430

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    32.8     15.8     12.0     43.1     57.0     87.9     84.7     12.1     15.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      193)
      58       46       53       58       65      147      143
```

----

Updated October 25, 2013
Colby L. SIMMONS, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9602

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report of EarthShell Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Simon Hodson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|By:                                                 | /s/SIMON HODSON
|--------------------------------------------------- | ---------------
|Simon Hodson Chief Executive OfficerAugust 13, 2002

---

QuickLinks
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

JOHN JAMES BAKER §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-378

 

WARDEN, FCI BEAUMONT §

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff John James Baker, a prisoner confined at the Federal Correctional Institution in

Beaumont, Texas, proceeding pro se, filed this Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2241.

The Court referred thismatterto theHonorable Christine L. Stetson, United States Magistrate

Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. 

On May 20, 2024, the magistrate judge recommended denying the petition. To date, the parties have

not filed objections to the report and recommendation.

The Court received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available

evidence. Proper notice was given to Petitioner at his last known address. See FED. R. CIV. P.

5(b)(2)(C). After careful review, the Court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of

the United States Magistrate Judge are correct. 

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct,

and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [Dkt. 12] is ADOPTED. 

Case 1:23-cv-00378-MJT-CLS Document 13 Filed 07/01/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 154
A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate judge’s

recommendation. 

2

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 1st day of July, 2024.

Case 1:23-cv-00378-MJT-CLS Document 13 Filed 07/01/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 155
Ratha OEUR, Petitioner, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA.

No. 19-7085

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/15/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      165,781
COMMITMENTS
  60,810   19,900   19,317   66,342  100,413  146,470  139,630   19,311   26,151

CHANGES FROM 10/08/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      4,859)
   5,678   -1,186      548     -728    4,334    5,498    3,696     -639    1,163

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    36.7     12.0     11.7     40.0     60.6     88.4     84.2     11.6     15.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      197)
      70       43       54       55       65      154      139
```

----

Updated October 30, 2013
UAET (02-2008)

Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint

Attach this form to the Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint event.

CASE AND DEADLINE INFORMATION

Civil Action No.:

Name of party requesting extension:

Is this the first application for extension of time in this case? Yes

No

If no, please indicate which application this represents: Second

Third

Other ___________

Date of Service of Summons:

Number of days requested: 30 days

15 days

Other _____ days

New Deadline Date: (Required)

ATTORNEY FILING APPLICATION INFORMATION

Full Name:

State Bar No.:

Firm Name:

Address:

Phone:

Fax:

Email:

A certificate of conference does not need to be filed with this unopposed application.

Case 2:23-cv-00398-JRG-RSP Document 22 Filed 09/25/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 211
# C_2017134EN.01000201.xml

| 28.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/2

---

Adoption of Commission Decision on the notification by the Kingdom of Spain of a modified transitional national plan referred to in Article 32(6) of Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions

(2017/C 134/02)

On 27 April 2017, the Commission adopted Commission Decision C(2017) 2614 on the notification by the Kingdom of Spain of a modified transitional national plan referred to in Article 32(6) of Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on industrial emissions (1).

1

This document is available on the following internet site: https://circabc.europa.eu/w/browse/36205e98-8e7a-47d7-808d-931bc5baf6ee

---

(1)  OJ L 334, 17.12.2010, p. 17.

1

---
Constantine GUS CRISTO, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 19-7580.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANTONIO DEMONTA HARVEY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, 

Senior District Judge. (4:03-cr-00088-H-4; 4:08-cv-00117-H)

Submitted: March 15, 2011 Decided: March 21, 2011

Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antonio Demonta Harvey, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. 

May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Antonio Demonta Harvey seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Harvey has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny Harvey’s motion for a certificate of 

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DARYL J. KOLLMAN, Plaintiff - Appellee, CELL TECH INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff-intervenor - Appellee,
v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA, a foreign corporation, Defendant - Appellant. No. 08-36017 D.C. No. 1:04-cv-03106-PA
MEMORANDUM *

DARYL J. KOLLMAN, Plaintiff, and CELL TECH INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware corporation, No. 08-36019 D.C. No. 1:04-cv-03106-PA



# FILED
OCT 21 2013 M OLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.Plaintiff-intervenor -

Appellant,
v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA, a foreign corporation, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Owen M. Panner, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Subm itted October 8, 2013 * * Portland, Oregon Before: SILVERMAN, W. FLETCHER, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges. National Union Fire Insurance Com pany appeals the district court’s grant of partial sum m ary judgm ent in favor of Cell Tech International, Inc. and Daryl Kollm an. Cell Tech cross appeals the district court’s grant of partial sum m ary judgm e nt in favor of National Union. We affirm
. The district court correctly held that the insured-versus-insured policy exclusion did not apply because Kollm an was not an insured under the policy. Kollm an was not a past executive of a subsidiary of Cell Tech. Rather, he was a

* * The panel unanim ously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argum e nt. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 2past executive of two entities before they were subsidiaries. Except for Hum aScan,

as specified in Endorsem ent 12, the policy did not insure past executives of previous corporate entities of Cell Tech or its subsidiaries that existed before August 6, 1999. The district court also correctly ruled that National Union did not have a duty to defend Cell Tech under the policy’s Securities Claim s coverage. The
com plaint alleged breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, conspiracy, and sim ilar claim s, not violations of securities laws. Vague references to potential securities violations are not enough, and the fact that Kollm an m ay have been able to am end the com

plaint to state securities claim s (which he never sought to do) is irrelevant. Oregon law requires that we consider whether the com plaint’s allegations, without am endm ent, could im pose liability for conduct covered by the policy. B resee Homes, Inc. v. Farmers Ins. Exch. , 293 P.3d 1036, 1039 (Or. 2012).

AFFIRMED.

3
Omar SMITH, Petitioner, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

No. 19-7513.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 6, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
Lyanne LEMEUNIER-FITZGERALD, petitioner, v. MAINE.

No. 18-6162.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Judicial Court of Maine denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

 Plaintiff,

v.

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, D/B/A 

VERIZON WIRELESS, AND VERIZON 

CORPORATE SERVICES GROUP INC.,

Defendants.

 Civil Action No. 2:24-cv-00007-JRG-RSP

 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION 

TO EXTEND CONTENTIONS DEADLINES

In accordance with the Unopposed Motion, it is hereby ORDERED that the following 

deadlines regarding contentions disclosures is in effect until further order of this Court:

Original Date Amended Date Event

March 11, 2024 March 18, 2024 Comply with P.R. 3-1 & 3-2 (Infringement Contentions)

May 6, 2024 May 20, 2024 Comply with P.R. 3-1 & 3-2 (Infringement Contentions)

May 6, 2024 May 20, 2024 Comply with Standing Order Regarding Subject-Matter 

Eligibility Contentions

Case 2:24-cv-00007-JRG-RSP Document 20-1 Filed 03/13/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 262
Exhibit 32.1

              SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act 2002 (18 U.S.C.  350),
the  undersigned,  Randy  Selman,  Chief  Executive  Officer of  Onstream  Media
Corporation  (the "Company") has executed this  certification in connection with
the filing with the Securities and Exchange  Commission of the Company's  Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report").

      The  undersigned  certifies  that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the undersigned has executed this certification as of
the 28th day of February 2006.


                                          ONSTREAM MEDIA CORPORATION

                                          /s/ Randy S. Selman
                                          -------------------
                                          Name: Randy Selman
                                          Title: Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SALVADOR JIMENEZ, III, §

§

Petitioner, §

§

versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23-CV-120

§

DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID, §

§

Respondent. §

MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Petitioner, Salvador Jimenez, III, an inmate currently confined at the Clements Unit with

the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institution Division, proceeding pro se,

filed this petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The court referred this

matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, for consideration

pursuant to the applicable laws and orders of this court. On September 25, 2023, the magistrate

judge entered a Report and Recommendation (#13) in which he recommended dismissing this case

for want of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). To date, Plaintiff has

not filed objections to the report.

The court received and considered the Report and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available

evidence. After careful review, the court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of

the United States Magistrate Judge are correct. 

Case 9:23-cv-00120-MAC-ZJH Document 17 Filed 02/07/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 19
Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (#13)

is ADOPTED. This case is DISMISSED for want of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of

Civil Procedure 41(b). 

2

Case 9:23-cv-00120-MAC-ZJH Document 17 Filed 02/07/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 20
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Environmental  Service
Professionals,  Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March
31, 2007 (the "Report") I, Edward L. Torres,  Acting Chief Financial  Officer of
the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated:  May 23, 2007


\s\ Edward L. Torres
------------------------------------------------
Edward L. Torres, Acting Chief Financial Officer

         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.














                                      -1-
David Paul LYNCH, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7480.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Alvin FELICIANOSOTO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6501.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 6, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 23.1

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our reports dated January 26, 2001 accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Reptron Electronics, Inc., that are
included in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000. We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the
Registration Statement of Reptron Electronics, Inc., on Forms S-8 (File No.
333-28727, effective June 6, 1997 and File No. 33-87854, effective December 22,
1994).

/S/ GRANT THORNTON LLP


Tampa, Florida
March 27, 2001
# mt.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20-0611 TERRY WALLACE,

Plaintiffand Appellant, V. LAW OFFICE OF BRUCE SPENCER,PLLC, LPH,WC, a Montana Corporation, GEISZLER STEELE,PC,and John Does 1-5,

Defendants and Appellees. 

# FILED JUN 0 1 2021 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Suprema Court State of Montana ORDER

Upon consideration ofAppellant's motion for an extension of time to file the reply brief, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including July 8, 2021,within which to file the reply brief. No further extensions will be granted. DATED this day ofJune, 2021. For the Court,
ChiefJustice 06/01/2021
Case Number: DA 20-0611
Randy BURKE, Petitioner, v. Diane PROSPER, Acting Warden, et al.

No. 18-9281

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands denied.
ex4-12.htm





Exhibit 4.12


 



Summary of Agreement between Guilin Jun Tai Fu Construction and Development Co. Ltd. and Guilin Institute of Survey Design to conduct construction site survey in the Guilin facility







Guilin Jun Tai Fu Construction and Development Co. Ltd. (“Guilin JTF”) entered into an agreement (“Agreement”) with Guilin Institute of Survey Design (“Survey Institute”) on July 28, 2011 for the construction site survey of Guilin JTF’s lot in the Tie Shan Industrial Park.  Pursuant to the Agreement, the Survey Institute shall conduct the survey from July 30, 2011 to August 20th 2011 and deliver Guilin JTF a survey report.  In consideration for the Survey Institute’s services, Guilin Jun Tai Fu shall pay the Survey Institute a contract price of RMB 115, 000.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1655
MARTY A. FERGUSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FRANK A. SERIO & SONS, INCORPORATED; TIM MCNEAL, Night Shift Foreman; TONY LOTITO, V.P. of Operations; BAKERY CONFECTIONERY AND TOBACCO WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION; AFL-CIO; JOHN TRUCKENMILLER, Manager; GARY HARTHAUSEN, Assistant Manager, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 97-1785
MARTY R. FERGUSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FRANK A. SERIO & SONS, INCORPORATED; TIM MCNEAL, Night Shift Foreman; TONY LOTITO, V.P. of Operations; BAKERY CONFECTIONERY AND TOBACCO WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION; AFL-CIO; JOHN TRUCKENMILLER, Manager; GARY HARTHAUSEN, Assistant Manager, Defendants - Appellees.2 No. 97-1884
MARTY R. FERGUSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FRANK A. SERIO & SONS, INCORPORATED; TIM MCNEAL, Night Shift For eman; TONY LOTITO, V.P. of Operations; BAKERY CONFECTIONERY AND TOBACCO WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION; AFL-CIO; JOHN TRUCKENMILLER, Manager; GARY HARTHAUSEN, Assistant Manager, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA96-3496-S) Submitted: September 11, 1997 Decided: September 19, 1997 Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mary R. Ferguson, Appellant Pro Se. William Nelson Butler, Robert Walker Taylor, Jr., HOWARD, BUTLER & MELFA, P.A., Towson, Maryland; H. Victoria Hedian, Frank Frio, ABATO, RUBENSTEIN & ABATO, P.A., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM:In these consolidated appeals, Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying his motion to amend his civil complaint, granting Defendants' motions for summary judgment, denying his motion for reconsideration, and denying as frivolous his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ferguson v. Frank A. Serio & Sons, Inc. , No. CA-96-3496-S (D. Md. Apr. 10; May 8; June 2 & June 10, 1997). Appellant's motions to compel discovery and to proceed in forma pauperis are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED