alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017079EN.01000201.xml

| 14.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/2

---

Notice for the attention of the persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/445, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/437 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(2017/C 79/02)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/445 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/437 (4) concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.

1

2

3

4

The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons that appear in the abovementioned Annexes should be included in the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2014/145/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. The grounds for designations of those persons appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the web sites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation that the decision to include them on the abovementioned list should be reconsidered to the following address before 1 June 2017:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 16.

1

(2)  OJ L 67, 14.3.2017, p. 88.

2

(3)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.

3

(4)  OJ L 67, 14.3.2017, p. 34.

4

---
Veeramuthu P. GOUNDER, petitioner, v. Argante R. GRIPPA, et al.

No. 18-1237.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 5, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Jack Robert SMITH, Petitioner, v. Harry OREOL.

No. 19-7449.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

Plaintiff, '

'

versus ' NO. 9:23-CR-12-MAC

'

CHARLES GRANT LEONARD, '

'

Defendant. '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Stetson conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued her Findings of Fact and Recommendation 

on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. Judge Stetson recommended that 

the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. She further recommended that the court adjudge 

the Defendant guilty on Counts One and Seven of the Indictment filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to Judge Stetson’s findings. The court ORDERS that the 

Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge are 

ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea 

agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Charles Grant Leonard, is 

Case 9:23-cr-00012-MAC-ZJH Document 38 Filed 05/02/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 132
2

adjudged guilty as to Counts One and Seven of the Indictment charging violations of 18 U.S.C. 

§ 2422(b)—Coercion and Enticement of a Minor.

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 2nd day of May, 2024.

Case 9:23-cr-00012-MAC-ZJH Document 38 Filed 05/02/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 133
<PAGE>

Exhibit 21.1       Subsidiaries of registrant

Scanvec Amiable, Ltd. - Israel owns 100% of the following companies: Scanvec
Amiable Inc.- U.S. (formerly Amiable Technologies Inc.) Scanvec Inc.-U.S.
(combined with Scanvec Amiable Inc.) Scanvec Germany GmbH-Germany (formerly
Amiable GmbH) MagniVec Inc.-U.S. company started in December, 2000 with no
operations

Scanvec Amiable, Ltd. owns 5% and Scanvec Amiable Inc owns 95% of Scanvec
Amiable Europe S.A.-Belgium.

Scanvec Amiable, Ltd. owns 51.8% of Scanvec Garment Systems Ltd.-Israel

Scanvec Garment Systems Ltd. owns 100% of Motion Production Inc.-U.S.
ORDER PAGE 1 OF 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TYLER DIVISION

LADARION HUGHES, ANGELA §

ALONZO, and DEMARCUS LIVELY, §

 §

Plaintiffs, §

 § Civil Action No. 6:23-cv-344

v. §

 §

SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS, §

 §

Defendant. §

ORDER

CAME ON this day for consideration Defendant’s Motion to Withdraw Counsel. The 

Court, after considering the pleadings, arguments of counsel, and the applicable law, is of the 

opinion that such Motion should be granted. It is therefore ORDERED that the above-referenced 

Motion is hereby in all things GRANTED. James A. Evans, III of Iglesias Law Firm, PLLC, is no 

longer counsel of record for Defendant. David Iglesias will remain as Lead Counsel for Defendant

in this matter. 

So ORDERED and SIGNED this day of

___________________________________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 25th June, 2024.

Case 6:23-cv-00344-JDK Document 25 Filed 06/25/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 233
### RECORD IMPOUNDED

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO . A

- 4927

- 17T1

SKILA HOLDING, INC.

, n/k/a

SKILA HOLDING, LLC,

Plaintiff

- Respondent,

v.

QPHARMA, INC.

,

Defendant

- Appellant.

___________________________

Submitted March 20, 2019

– Decided April 1, 2019

Before Judges Koblitz, Currier, and Mayer.

On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law

Division, Morris County, Docket No. L

- 0 166

- 18

.

Riker Danzig Scherer Hyland & Perretti, LLP

, attorneys for appellant ( Frank J. Vitolo , of counsel and

on the brief s ; Jonathan M. Sandler and Dylan C.

Goetsch , on the brief s ).

Naim S. Surgeon ( Akerman LLP ), attorney for

respondent

.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the

internet

, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36

- 3.2 A

- 4927

- 17T1

PER CURIAM

We were advised prior to argument that th is matter w as settled, and the

parties hav e executed a stipulation of dismissal of this appeal

. Accordingly, the

appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dismissed.
Miguel A. JUSINO, et ux., Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 18-9280.

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 19 Received in Senate (RDS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 19

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 19, 2013

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater Washington 
                            Soap Box Derby.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR SOAP BOX DERBY RACES.

    (a) In General.--The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Association 
(in this resolution referred to as the ``sponsor'') shall be permitted 
to sponsor a public 

              

event, soap box derby races (in this resolution referred to as the 
``event''), on the Capitol Grounds.
    (b) Date of Event.--The event shall be held on June 15, 2013, or on 
such other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate jointly designate.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board, the event shall be--
            (1) free of admission charge and open to the public; and
            (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The sponsor shall assume full 
responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all 
activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the 
sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, 
sound amplification devices, and other related structures and equipment 
as may be required for the event.

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

    The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board are 
authorized to make such additional arrangements as may be required to 
carry out the event.

SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 18, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Terry O'Nell HALL, Petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 19-7827.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 4, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Eleventh District denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MediaNews Group, Inc. (the
"Company") for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William Dean
Singleton, Vice Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition of the Company
                  as of the dates indicated and results of operations of the
                  Company for the periods indicated.

                                    /s/ WILLIAM DEAN SINGLETON
                                        --------------------------------------
                                        William Dean Singleton,
                                        Vice Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
                                        and Director
                                        September 16, 2002
Caryn Hall YOST-RUDGE, Petitioner, v. A TO Z PROPERTIES, INC., et al.

No. 19-7929.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 11/12/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       59,513
COMMITMENTS
  13,080    8,285    2,323   28,232   35,389   43,636   45,997   15,877   13,516

CHANGES FROM 11/05/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,710)
     858      717      365     -509     -659      714      423    1,996    2,287

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    22.0     13.9      3.9     47.4     59.5     73.3     77.3     26.7     22.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       78)
      20       12       13       40       27       65       48
```

----

Updated November 15, 2013
Michael Otho RAIHALA, Petitioner, v. MICHIGAN.

No. 18-9225

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,665
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,191
<ALLOWANCES>                                       133
<INVENTORY>                                         83
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,008
<PP&E>                                           1,861
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,017
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,953
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,747
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         33
<COMMON>                                           190
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,949
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,953
<SALES>                                            892
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,153
<CGS>                                              239
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      239
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,235
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,281)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,281)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,281)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.14)
        

</TABLE>
Stephanie JONES, Petitioner, v. Jeremy EDER, et al.

No. 19-1112.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 103 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.103
                                         Agreed to July 29, 2014        

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR D.C. SPECIAL 
              OLYMPICS LAW ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN.

    On October 3, 2014, or on such other date as the Speaker of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration 
of the Senate may jointly designate, the 29th annual District of 
Columbia Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution 
referred to as the ``event'') may be run through the Capitol Grounds to 
carry the Special Olympics torch to honor local Special Olympics 
athletes.

SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

    The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as may be 
necessary to carry out the event.

SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

    The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for physical 
preparations for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, in connection with the event.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7184

RANDY WILLIFORD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM D. CATOE; RALPH S. BEARDSLEY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-96-1699-17AK, CA-96-1700-17AK)

Submitted: January 9, 1997 Decided: January 23, 1997

Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randy Williford, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, a South Carolina inmate, appeals the district

court's order denying relief on his two 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994)

complaints under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1994), amended by Prison

Litigation Reform Act, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's order accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find that this appeal

is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. Williford v. Catoe, Nos. CA-96-1699-17AK;

CA-96-1700-17AK (D.S.C. July 12, 1996). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

Exhibit 21

                               G&L Realty Corp.
                             List of Subsidiaries
                               October 31, 1999


1.   G&L Hampden, Inc., a Delaware corporation
2.   G&L Hampden, LLC a Delaware limited liability company
3.   G&L Realty Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
4.   G&L Realty Financing II, Inc., a Delaware corporation
5.   G&L Realty Financing Partnership II, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
6.   G&L Medical, Inc., a Delaware corporation
7.   G&L Gardens, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company
8.   G&L Management Delaware Corp., a Delaware corporation
9.   G&L Senior Care, Inc., a Delaware corporation
10.  G&L Medical Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
11.  GLN Capital Co. LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
12.  GL/PHP, LLC a Delaware limited liability company
13.  Theme World, L.P., a New Jersey limited partnership
14.  Valley Convalescent, LLC, a California limited liability company
15.  435 N. Roxbury Drive, Ltd., a California limited partnership
16.  G&L - Grabel San Pedro, LLC
17.  G&L Burbank, LLC
18.  G&L Burbank Managers Corp., a California corporation
19.  G&L Holy Cross, LLC
20.  G&L Holy Cross Managers Corp., a California corporation
21.  G&L Tustin, LLC
22.  G&L Tustin Managers Corp., a California corporation
23.  G&L Valencia, LLC
24.  G&L Penasquitos, LLC
25.  G&L Penasquitos, Inc.
26.  GLH Pacific Gardens, LLC
27.  GLH Pacific Gardens Corp., a California corporation
28.  G&L Hoquiam, LLC
29.  G&L Lyon, LLC
30.  G&L Coronado (1998), LLC
31.  G&L Parsons on Eagle Run, LLC
32.  G&L Parsons on Eagle Run, Inc.
33.  GLR/Yorba Linda, LLC
34.  Lakeview Associates, LLC
# C_2017384EN.01000303.xml

| 14.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 384/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 384/3

---

EUROPEAN AGENCY FOR SAFETY AND HEALTH AT WORK

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2016

(2017/C 384/10)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://osha.europa.eu/en/about-eu-osha/what-we-do/how-we-work/finance/finance-and-budget-information

---