alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w21






Exhibit 10.21




Tennessee Valley Authority

Coal Supply & Origination

1101 Market Street, MR 2A

Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402-2801




CONTRACT SUPPLEMENT



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 

	TO:

	 	Armstrong Coal Company, Inc.
	 	Supplement No.
	 	14	 
	 

	 	7701 Forsyth Boulevard - 10th Floor
	 	Date
	 	December 8, 2011

	 

	 	St. Louis, Missouri 63105
	 	Group-Contract No.
	 	612-40668	 
	 

	 	 	 	Plant
	 	Kingston






Attention: Mr. Martin Wilson



This confirms the December 8, 2011, agreement reached between Eddie Spicer of TVA and Mickey
Fitzhugh of Armstrong Coal Company.



Train W499 was loaded on December 7, 2011, under Traffic Control Number 196218 with coal which
reflected a total moisture content of 12.61 percent compared with the REJECT SPECIFICATION,
contained in Section 9.0 of the Contract, of 12.00 percent for that component of the analysis. As
agreed, TVA will accept this trainload of coal in consideration of a $0.50 per ton reduction in
price. Also, the analysis results obtained on this shipment will be included in the quarterly
quality adjustment calculations required under Section 8.0, Adjustment for Quality. TVA’s
Accounts Payable organization will deduct $5,615.85 from Contractor’s account.



All other terms and conditions of the contract remain unchanged.



Please complete the acceptance below and return the copy of this contract supplement to this
office. You should retain the original for your file.



In the event Contractor fails to execute this Supplement in the acceptance space provided below or
fails to return such executed Supplement to TVA, shipment of coal to TVA following the date of
Contractor’s receipt of this Supplement shall constitute an acceptance by Contractor of all the
terms and conditions of this Supplement, unless within five (5) business days of the date of
receipt of this Supplement, Contractor notifies TVA, both orally and in writing that this
Supplement is not accepted.








	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 

	Accepted

	 	Armstrong Coal Co.	 	Tennessee Valley Authority	 	 
	 

	 	 

          (Company)
	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By

	 	/s/  Martin D. Wilson	 	By 	/s/ Connie S. Gazaway	 
	 

	 	 

	 	 	 

	 	 
	 

	 	 

	 	 

Connie S. Gazaway
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Asset Management Specialist	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Title
	 	President	 	/s/ Ray W. Popoynak	 	 
	 

	 	 

	 	 

Manager, Coal Acquisition
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Date

	 	 

12/13/11
	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 

	 	 	 	 	 






TVA RESTRICTED INFORMATION
Shane Michael GROGGER, petitioner, v. Kevin GENOVESE, Warden.

No. 17-8901.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION 

THE DAILY WIRE, LLC et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT 

OF STATE et al., 

 Defendants. 

 Civil Action No. 6:23-cv-00609 (JDK) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Upon consideration of Defendants’ motion to transfer venue, it is hereby: 

ORDERED that Defendants’ motion is GRANTED; and 

ORDERED that this case be transferred to the United States District Court for the District 

of Columbia. 

Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 14-1 Filed 02/09/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 636
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TEXARKANA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CASE NO. 5:23CR23

§

ALAN HEATH §

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The above-styled matter was referred to the Honorable J. Boone Baxter, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal 

Procedure. Judge Baxter conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Federal Rule 

of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 29). Judge 

Baxter recommended that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea and conditionally approve the 

plea agreement. He further recommended that the Court finally adjudge Defendant as guilty of 

Count Six of the Indictment. Count Six of the Indictment charges a violation of 21 U.S.C. 841 

(a)(1), possession with intent to distribute a mixture containing Fentanyl. The Court is of the 

opinion that the Report and Recommendation should be accepted. It is accordingly ORDERED

that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 29) is 

ADOPTED. It is further

ORDERED that the Defendant’s guilty plea is accepted and approved by the Court. 

Further, the plea agreement is approved by the Court, conditioned upon a review of the presentence 

report. It is finally 

ORDERED that, pursuant to the Defendant’s amended plea agreement, the Court finds the 

Defendant GUILTY of Count Six of the Indictment in the above-numbered cause and enters a

Case 5:23-cr-00023-RWS-JBB Document 31 Filed 06/12/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 76
2

JUDGMENT OF GUILTY against the Defendant as to Count Six of the Indictment.

 

____________________________________

ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SIGNED this 12th day of June, 2024.

Case 5:23-cr-00023-RWS-JBB Document 31 Filed 06/12/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 77
Exhibit
32.1





SECTION
906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 (18 U.S.C. 350), the undersigned,
Randy Selman, Chief Executive Officer of Onstream Media Corporation (the
"Company") has executed this certification in connection with the filing with
the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2008 (the "Report").





The
undersigned certifies that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 29th
day of December 2008.





ONSTREAM
      MEDIA CORPORATION/s/ Randy S. SelmanName:
      Randy SelmanTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer
No. 6:23-cr-00100

United States of America

v.

Malon Lynn McCaslin

ORDER

This criminal action was referred to United States Magistrate 

Judge K. Nicole Mitchell for administration of a guilty plea under 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The magistrate judge conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and 

issued findings of fact and recommendation on guilty plea. Doc. 28. 

The magistrate judge recommended that the court accept defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge defendant guilty on count one of the 

indictment. Id. at 2. Defendant waived his right to object to the magistrate judge’s findings. Id.

The court hereby accepts the findings of fact and recommendation on guilty plea of the United States Magistrate Judge. The court 

also accepts defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea 

agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

In accordance with defendant’s guilty plea, the court finds defendant Malon Lynn McCaslin guilty of count one of the indictment, 

charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) - Felon in Possession of 

Firearms.

So ordered by the court on April 3, 2024.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cr-00100-JCB-KNM Document 30 Filed 04/03/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 78
Gabriel CRUZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8015.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Order filed August 6, 2015 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00462-CV

____________

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V.

TREELINE PARTNERS, LTD., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, 

LAROCA PARTNERS II, LTD., A TEXAS LIMITED 

PARTNERSHIP, Appellees

On Appeal from County Civil Court at Law No. 3

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1016954

ORDER

This is an appeal from a judgment signed March 10, 2014. On July 15, 2015, 

2015, appellant The State of Texas and appellee Outfront Media LLC (formerly 

CBS Outdoor, Inc.) (“Outfront”) filed a motion to set aside the trial court’s 

judgment with respect to Outfront without regard to the merits and remand the case 
with respect to Outfront for entry of judgment in accordance with the agreement of 

the parties. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. Accordingly, we enter the following order.

We order that portion of the appeal filed by The State of Texas with respect 

to Outfront SEVERED from this case and filed under a new appellate case number,

14-15-00623-CV, which will be styled The State of Texas v. CBS Outdoor, Inc., a 

Delaware Corporation. The record filed in case number 14-14-00462-CV, styled 

The State of Texas v. Treeline Partners, Ltd., a Texas Limited Partnership, Laroca 

Partners II, Ltd., a Texas Limited Partnership, is ordered transferred to and filed in 

case number 14-15-00623-CV.

 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Brown and Wise.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

ASHLEY BLAINE BROOKS

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NUMBER 4:23-CR-00223-SDJ

ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE’S REPORT AND FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY

The Court referred this matter to the United States Magistrate Judge for 

administration of a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The 

Magistrate Judge conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The 

Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea 

and adjudge Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment.

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings. 

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on 

Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court also accepts 

Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea agreement until after review 

of the presentence report. 

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant 

Ashley Blaine Brooks GUILTY of Count One of the Indictment, charging a 

violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2)(A) and (b)(1) - Receipt of Child 

Case 4:23-cr-00223-SDJ-BD Document 44 Filed 11/21/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:

144
2

Pornography.

Case 4:23-cr-00223-SDJ-BD Document 44 Filed 11/21/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:

145
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

DANNY LYNN NABORS (3) 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NUMBER 6:23-CR-00113-JDK 

ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S 

REPORT AND FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY 

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable John D. Love, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed 

by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate 

Judge recommended that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant 

guilty on Count Five of the Indictment. 

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings. 

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea 

of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers 

acceptance of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Danny Lynn 

Nabors (3) GUILTY of Count Five of the Indictment, charging a violation of Title 21 U.S.C. 

§ 841(a)(1) - Possession with the Intent to Distribute and Distribution of at least 5, but less

than 50, grams of Methamphetamine. 

Case 6:23-cr-00113-JDK-JDL Document 81 Filed 04/03/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 219
So ORDERED and SIGNED this day of

___________________________________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 3rd April, 2024.

Case 6:23-cr-00113-JDK-JDL Document 81 Filed 04/03/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 220
Zafar MEHMOOD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6695.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 1997
FORM 10-K AND IS QALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                                  1000

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                        DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                       3,191
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               36,546
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 1,900
<INVENTORY>                                                 50,305
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            93,979
<PP&E>                                                      99,632
<DEPRECIATION>                                              53,303
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             175,359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       74,540
<BONDS>                                                    105,560
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                    16,486
<OTHER-SE>                                                    (186)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               175,359
<SALES>                                                    447,536
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           447,536
<CGS>                                                      351,580
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              351,580
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             2,306
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          16,894
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             (6,153)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 1,393
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         (7,546)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                (7,546)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                   (2)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   (2)



</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JUAN MANUEL PENA-ANGUIANO,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-10473

D.C. No. 3:08-cr-00091-JSW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Jeffrey S. White, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 17, 2013** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and GRABER, Circuit Judges. 

Juan Manuel Pena-Anguiano appeals pro se from the district court’s order

denying his pro se motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 

Pena-Anguiano contends that the district court erred by failing to grant his

FILED

DEC 30 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
request for a sentence reduction, arguing that he should have received a Guidelines

departure under U.S.S.G. § 5K3.1. The government contends that this appeal

should be dismissed based on an appeal waiver. We decline to enforce the waiver

and instead affirm on the merits. The district court did not err in denying PenaAnguiano’s request for a sentence reduction because he failed to state a valid legal

basis for reducing his sentence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c).

AFFIRMED.

2 12-10473
<PAGE>



EXHIBIT 32 (a)      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



The undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December
31 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Date:  February 13, 2004                          /s/ Eric H. Paulson
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Eric H. Paulson
                                                  Chairman of the Board,
                                                  President and
                                                  Chief Executive Officer



                                       31
IN RE Robert N. BROOKS, Petitioner.

No. 19-7435.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020.

Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements (i) on Form S-8 (No. 333-68221) pertaining toregistration of shares under the Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation Long-TermIncentive Plan and shares under Stone Container Corporation option plansconverted to Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation shares in the mergeragreement; (ii) on Form S-8 (No. 33-57085) pertaining toregistration of shares under the Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation 1992 StockOption Plan; (iii) on Form S-8 (No. 333-31961) pertaining toregistration of additional shares under the Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation1992 Stock Option Plan; (iv) on Form S-8 (No. 333-47143)pertaining to the registration of shares under the Smurfit-Stone ContainerCorporation Management Incentive Plan; (v) on Form S-8 (No. 333-32850)pertaining to the registration of shares under the Smurfit-Stone ContainerCorporation Hourly Savings Plan, the Smurfit-Stone Container CorporationSavings Plan, the Jefferson Smurfit Corporation Hourly Savings Plan, and theSmurfit Packaging Corporation Savings Plan; (vi) on Form S-4 (No. 333-43656)pertaining to registration of shares under the Smurfit-Stone ContainerCorporation Preferred Stock Plan; (vii) on Form S-8 (No. 333-58018)pertaining to registration of shares under the St. Laurent Paperboard HourlySavings Plan; (viii) on Form S-8 (No. 333-117474) pertaining toregistration of additional shares under the Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan and (ix) on Form S-8 (No. 333-117475)pertaining to registration of shares under the Smurfit-Stone ContainerCorporation Non-Employee Director Deferred Compensation Plan, of our reportsdated March 2, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statementsand schedule of Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation and the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting of Smurfit-Stone ContainerCorporation, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,2009.

 

|   |   | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------|

 

St. Louis, Missouri

March 2, 2010

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 116 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 116

 Congratulating the Sailors of the United States Submarine Force upon 
 the completion of 4,000 ballistic missile submarine (SSBN) deterrent 
                                patrols.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 18, 2014

 Mr. Kilmer (for himself, Mr. Courtney, Mr. Langevin, Mr. Forbes, and 
 Mr. Gallego) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Congratulating the Sailors of the United States Submarine Force upon 
 the completion of 4,000 ballistic missile submarine (SSBN) deterrent 
                                patrols.

Whereas the Sailors of the United States Submarine Force recently completed the 
        4,000th deterrent patrol of a ballistic missile submarine (SSBN);
Whereas this milestone is significant for the Submarine Force, its crews and 
        their families, the United States Navy, and the entire country;
Whereas this milestone was reached through the combined efforts and impressive 
        achievements of all of the submariners who have participated in such 
        patrols since the first patrol of USS George Washington (SSBN 598) in 
        1960;
Whereas, as a result of the dedication and commitment to excellence of the 
        Sailors of the United States Submarine Force, ballistic missile 
        submarines have always been ready and vigilant, reassuring United States 
        allies and deterring anyone who might seek to do harm to the United 
        States or United States allies;
Whereas the national maritime strategy of the United States recognizes the 
        critical need for strategic deterrence in today's uncertain world;
Whereas the true strength of the ballistic missile submarine lies in the 
        extremely talented and motivated Sailors who have voluntarily chosen to 
        serve in the submarine community; and
Whereas the inherent stealth, unparalleled firepower, and nearly limitless 
        endurance of the ballistic missile submarine provide a credible 
        deterrence for any enemies that would seek to use force against the 
        United States or United States allies: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) congratulates the Sailors of the United States 
        Submarine Force upon the completion of 4,000 ballistic missile 
        submarine (SSBN) deterrent patrols; and
            (2) honors and thanks the crews of ballistic missile 
        submarines and their devoted families for their continued 
        dedication and sacrifice.
                                 <all>
```