alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 09/10/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       82,422
COMMITMENTS
  24,537    2,754    3,978   48,078   73,224   76,593   79,956    5,829    2,466

CHANGES FROM 09/03/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,889)
  -1,159      230      335    3,341      994    2,517    1,559     -628      330

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    29.8      3.3      4.8     58.3     88.8     92.9     97.0      7.1      3.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       86)
      16        6        2       43       39       60       46
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 09/10/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      278,807
COMMITMENTS
  74,889   47,188   15,793  172,135  206,009  262,817  268,990   15,990    9,817

CHANGES FROM 09/03/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     30,188)
   3,145    3,565    1,844   23,851   24,105   28,840   29,514    1,348      674

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    26.9     16.9      5.7     61.7     73.9     94.3     96.5      5.7      3.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      177)
      46       27       18       75       65      132      100
```

----

Updated September 13, 2013
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/19/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       88,814
COMMITMENTS
  28,019    2,137    3,527   50,836   80,427   82,382   86,091    6,432    2,723

CHANGES FROM 11/12/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,552)
     637       22       13    1,562      915    2,212      950     -660      602

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    31.5      2.4      4.0     57.2     90.6     92.8     96.9      7.2      3.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       87)
      15        4        1       46       41       61       46
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/19/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      244,792
COMMITMENTS
  84,320   34,325    1,256  143,699  203,405  229,275  238,986   15,517    5,806

CHANGES FROM 11/12/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -8,449)
     959    4,016      -56  -10,109  -13,663   -9,206   -9,703      757    1,254

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    34.4     14.0      0.5     58.7     83.1     93.7     97.6      6.3      2.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      177)
      57       20       12       73       59      135       86
```

----

Updated November 22, 2013
Tyree MILES, Petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 19-7187

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

*1220Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office denied.
First Amendment to Credit Agreement



 Exhibit 10.17 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT 
 THIS AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT (this
“Amendment”) is entered into as of March 16, 2012, by and between GLOBUS MEDICAL, INC., a Delaware corporation (“Borrower”), and WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (“Bank”). 

RECITALS 

WHEREAS, Borrower is currently indebted to Bank pursuant to the terms and conditions of that certain Credit Agreement between Borrower
and Bank dated as of May 3, 2011, as amended from time to time (“Credit Agreement”). 
 WHEREAS, Bank and
Borrower have agreed to certain changes in the terms and conditions set forth in the Credit Agreement and have agreed to amend the Credit Agreement to reflect said changes. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree that the Credit Agreement shall be amended as follows: 

1. Section 1.1 (a) is hereby amended by deleting “May 31, 2012” as the last day on which Bank will make advances
under the Line of Credit, and by substituting for said date “May 31, 2014”. 
 2. Section 5.10 (c) is hereby
deleted in its entirety, without substitution. 
 3. Except as specifically provided herein, all terms and conditions of the
Credit Agreement remain in full force and effect, without waiver or modification. All terms defined in the Credit Agreement shall have the same meaning when used in this Amendment. This Amendment and the Credit Agreement shall be read together, as
one document. 
 4. Borrower hereby remakes all representations and warranties contained in the Credit Agreement and reaffirms
all covenants set forth therein. Borrower further certifies that as of the date of this Amendment there exists no Event of Default as defined in the Credit Agreement, nor any condition, act or event which with the giving of notice or the passage of
time or both would constitute any such Event of Default. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, intending to be legally
bound hereby, have caused this Amendment to be executed as a sealed instrument as of the day and year first written above. 
  

							
	GLOBUS MEDICAL, INC.	 		 	 WELLS FARGO BANK,
 NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION

				
	By:	 	 /s/
Richard Baron                                      
                      (SEAL)
	 		 	 /s/ Tara Handforth

		 	Richard Baron, Chief Financial Officer	 		 	Tara Handforth, Vice President


  
 -1-
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 21-0075 

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

ANTHONY WEIMER, 

Defendant and Appellant. 

FILED 

NOV 0 2 2021 

Bovven Greenwood 

Clerk of Supreme Court 

qtRto nf fvlontane 

ORDER 

Appel lant Anthony Weimer has filed a petition for rehearing or this Court's 

October 12, 2021 Opinion reversing Weimer's conviction and remanding the case for a 

new trial. State v. Weimer, 2021 MT 266N. Appellee objects to the petition. 

Under M. R. App. P. 20, this Court seldom grants petitions for rehearing. The rule 

makes clear that this Court will entertain a petition for rehearing on very limited grounds. 

This Court will consider a petition for rehearing only if the opinion "overlooked some fact 

material to the decision," if the opinion missed a question presented by a party that would 

have decided the case, or if our decision "conflicts with a statute or controlling decision 

not addressed" by the Court. M. R. App. P. 20. 

Having fully considered Appellant's petition and the response, the Court concludes 

Weimer has not established grounds for rehearing under Rule 20 and rehearing is not 

warranted. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the petition for rehearing is DENIED. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all parties and counsel of 

record. 

Dated this day of November, 2021. 

Chief Justice 

11/02/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0075
I 

Justices
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., 

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON 

WIRELESS 

 Defendants. 

ERICSSON INC. 

 Intervenor. 

 Case No. 2:23-cv-00470-JRG-RSP 

 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 

OF INTERVENOR ERICSSON INC.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, the undersigned counsel for Intervenor 

Ericsson Inc. (“Ericsson”) certify that: 

1. Ericsson Inc. is a Delaware corporation that is wholly-owned by Ericsson Holding 

II Inc., which is also a Delaware corporation. Ericsson Holding II Inc. is wholly-owned by 

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson. 

2. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (“LME”) is publicly held and has no parent 

corporation. LME has Class A and Class B shares that are listed on Nasdaq Stockholm in Sweden. 

In the United States, the Class B shares are listed on NASDAQ New York in the form of American 

Depositary Shares (ADS) evidenced by American Depositary Receipts (ADR). Each ADS 

represents one Class B share. No publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of LME’s stock, 

Case 2:23-cv-00470-JRG-RSP Document 24 Filed 12/12/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 869
 2 

which comprises Class A and Class B shares. However, as of 31 December 2022, Investor AB 

and AB Industrivärden each own shares in LME representing 10% or more of the voting rights. 

Dated: December 12, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Matthew S. Yungwirth 

Deron R. Dacus (TBN 00790553) 

ddacus@dacusfirm.com 

THE DACUS FIRM, P.C. 

821 ESE Loop 323 

Suite 430 

Tyler, Texas 75701 

Telephone: 903.705.1117 

Facsimile: 903.581.2543 

Email: ddacus@dacusfirm.com 

Matthew S. Yungwirth 

Email: msyungwirth@duanemorris.com 

John R. Gibson 

Email: jrgibson@duanemorris.com 

Alice E. Snedeker 

aesnedeker@duanemorris.com 

DUANE MORRIS LLP 

1075 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 1700 

Atlanta, GA 30309 

Telephone: (404) 253-6900 

Counsel for Intervenor Ericsson Inc.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to 

electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF system 

per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on December 12, 2023. 

/s/ Matthew S. Yungwirth 

Matthew S. Yungwirth 

Case 2:23-cv-00470-JRG-RSP Document 24 Filed 12/12/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 870
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of opinions that

have no pre cedential value and merely decide particular cases on
the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless

expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 95-10423 Summary Calendar

_____________________

CARLEY J. LEWIS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SHIRLEY S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

(2:93CV00195)

_________________________________________________________________ December 27, 1995 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Carley J. Lewis injured her back at work, and was awarded

Social Security disability insurance benefits for the period March

29, 1989, to Ja nuary 20, 1991. The district court held that the

record would not support a determination that Lewis, although

unable to perform the full range of sedentary work, is capable of

performing other work existing in significa nt numbers in the

economy, and it remanded her case to the Commissioner for further

analysis of her exertional and non-exertional limitations and- 2 -

res idual functional capacity. S ee, e.g. , Muse v. Sullivan

, 925

F.2d 785, 789 (5th Cir. 1991) (describing well-know n five-step

s equential disability analysis in which the Commissioner has the

burden of showing, at step five, that the claimant' s impairment

does not prevent the claimant from engaging in substantial gainful

activity).

Lewis contends that the district court should have remanded,

instead, for an immediate award of disability benefits, because the

Commissioner failed to prove that she is capable of performing

s ubstantial gainful activity. It is within the district court's

discretion to remand to the Commissioner for a further hearing or

to direct the Commissioner to award benefits. S tephens v. Chater

,

No. 95-10424, slip op. at 2 (5th Cir. Oct. 16, 1995) (unpublished)

(citing Emory v. Sullivan , 936 F.2d 1092, 1095 (10th Cir. 1991)).

Because the record is not clear that Lewis is unable to engage in

any substantial gainful activity because of her condition,

additional fact-finding is necessary, and a remand for an immediate

aw ard of benefits is not appropriate. S ee Dollar v. Bowen

, 821

F.2d 530, 534-35 (10th Cir. 1987). Accordingly, the district court

did not abuse its discretion by remanding Lewis' case for further

proceedings.

AFFIRMED
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 09/10/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       82,422
COMMITMENTS
  24,537    2,754    3,978   48,078   73,224   76,593   79,956    5,829    2,466

CHANGES FROM 09/03/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,889)
  -1,159      230      335    3,341      994    2,517    1,559     -628      330

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    29.8      3.3      4.8     58.3     88.8     92.9     97.0      7.1      3.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       86)
      16        6        2       43       39       60       46
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 09/10/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      278,807
COMMITMENTS
  74,889   47,188   15,793  172,135  206,009  262,817  268,990   15,990    9,817

CHANGES FROM 09/03/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     30,188)
   3,145    3,565    1,844   23,851   24,105   28,840   29,514    1,348      674

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    26.9     16.9      5.7     61.7     73.9     94.3     96.5      5.7      3.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      177)
      46       27       18       75       65      132      100
```

----

Updated September 13, 2013
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID VASQUEZ-CRUZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-71307

Agency No. A079-544-229

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 13, 2010** 

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

David Vasquez-Cruz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to

reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Iturribarria v. INS,

FILED

SEP 24 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-71307

321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir. 2003). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition

for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Vasquez-Cruz’s motion to

reopen because the BIA considered the evidence submitted and acted within its

broad discretion in determining Vasquez-Cruz did not show prima facie eligibility

for relief under the Convention Against Torture. See INS v. Abudu, 485 U.S. 94,

104-05 (1988) (the BIA may deny a motion to reopen for failure to establish a

prima facie case for the underlying relief sought); Singh v. INS, 295 F.3d 1037,

1039 (9th Cir. 2002) (the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen shall be reversed if it

is “arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law”).

We lack jurisdiction to review Vasquez-Cruz’s challenge to the BIA’s

October 29, 2007, order denying his application for cancellation of removal,

because this petition for review is not timely as to that order. See Singh v. INS, 315

F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir. 2003). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7143
ERNEST LEE PRESSLEY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-710-2) Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 30, 1997 Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ernest Lee Pressley, Appellant Pro Se. Leah Ann Darron, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Pressley v. Angelone , No. CA-96-710-2 (E.D. Va. July 29, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

					NO. 2-05-472-CR

JOEY GARCIA	              							APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	----------

	FROM THE 89TH DISTRICT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered appellant’s “Motion To Dismiss Appeal.”  The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).  No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f). 									 												

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	HOLMAN, GARDNER and WALKER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: April 6, 2006
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 02/19/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      671,813
COMMITMENTS
  83,199   49,221  181,299  386,853  423,471  651,350  653,991   20,463   17,822

CHANGES FROM 02/12/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -24,805)
   4,450     -758  -10,329  -15,897   -9,112  -21,775  -20,198   -3,029   -4,607

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    12.4      7.3     27.0     57.6     63.0     97.0     97.3      3.0      2.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      157)
      46       32       65       68       68      145      140
```

----

Updated February 22, 2013
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 05/14/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       54,185
COMMITMENTS
   1,862    8,161    2,123   50,105   43,759   54,090   54,043       95      142

CHANGES FROM 05/07/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,965)
     290      257       87    2,535    2,493    2,912    2,837       53      128

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     3.4     15.1      3.9     92.5     80.8     99.8     99.7      0.2      0.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       44)
       3       11        6       24       24       31       38`

---

Updated May 17, 2013