alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Con. Res. 121 Agreed to December 12, 2014

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 3979, the Clerk 

of the House of Representatives shall correct the title so as to 

read: ‘‘An Act to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2015 for 

military activities of the Department of Defense, for military 

construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, 

to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and 

for other purposes.’’. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the
period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick J. Moore, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|                                                                                          |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ PATRICK J. MOORE Patrick J. Moore
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
March 17, 2009 |  | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation and will be retained by Smurfit-Stone Container
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 22 

Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony to award 

the Congressional Gold Medal to Doctor Muhammad Yunus. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 6, 2013 

Mr. HOLT submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on House Administration 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony to award the Congressional Gold Medal to Doctor 

Muhammad Yunus. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF ROTUNDA FOR CEREMONY TO AWARD 

4 CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL TO DOCTOR 

5 MUHAMMAD YUNUS. 

6 The rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used 

7 on April 17, 2013, for a ceremony to award the Congres8 sional Gold Medal to Doctor Muhammad Yunus in rec9 ognition of his contributions to the fight against global 

10 poverty. Physical preparations for the ceremony shall be 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 22 IH 

1 carried out in accordance with such conditions as the Ar2 chitect of the Capitol may prescribe. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.42



 Exhibit 10.42 
 Summary of MeadWestvaco Corporation 2012 Annual Incentive Plan under 2005 

Performance Incentive Plan, as amended 
 Under the MeadWestvaco Corporation Annual Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), which is a part of the 2005 Performance Incentive Plan, the Compensation and Organization Development Committee (the
“Committee”) of the Board of Directors annually awards each executive an annual incentive award that is payable in cash. The size of each executive officer’s annual award is determined by application of his or her annual incentive
target expressed as a percentage of base salary, which the Committee examines annually to confirm that the target is reasonable when viewed against external competitive market data, peer group and general industry trends. 

For 2012, the Committee established a performance-based incentive pool for certain executive officers equal to a designated percentage of actual earnings
before interest and tax (“EBIT”) achieved. EBIT is defined as full year net sales less the cost of goods sold and selling, general and administrative expenses, excluding interest income and expense, corporate income taxes, extraordinary
items, discontinued operations, restructuring charges and certain one-time costs and the cumulative effect of accounting changes. 
 Funding of
the performance-based incentive pool under this formula permits the Committee to pay annual cash incentives to all executive officers based on the attainment of additional key financial and/or operational metrics. These additional objectives for
executive officers are also set by the Committee, and generally include such goals as (i) enterprise economic profit (“EP”), defined as EBIT less the company’s weighted average cost of capital applied to total capital employed, (net
debt plus total equity) subject to certain adjustments, (ii) revenue growth and (iii) productivity. For each of these performance objectives, the Committee sets performance driven threshold, target and stretch payout levels reflecting a suggested
payout curve ranging from 50% of the target incentive to 200% of the target incentive. Annual incentives are subject to an individual maximum payout in accordance with the terms of the Plan. The Committee may adjust award values to reflect progress
made towards target performance levels for EP, revenue growth and productivity goals, provided no awards are payable in the event the threshold for EBIT (which funds the incentive pool) is not achieved. 

Annual incentive awards are subject to the company’s Recoupment Policy.
MAXELL, LTD., Petitioner, v. FANDANGO MEDIA, LLC.

No. 19-852.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 03/19/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       52,619
COMMITMENTS
   1,297    6,207    1,597   47,953   42,913   50,847   50,717    1,772    1,902

CHANGES FROM 03/12/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        445)
    -596       -8     -111      777      233       70      114      375      331

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     2.5     11.8      3.0     91.1     81.6     96.6     96.4      3.4      3.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       43)
       4        9        7       23       23       32       34`

---

Updated March 22, 2013
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 31, 2017

a0123

Order 

Clerk

January 31, 2017

153698

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153698

COA: 324706

Oakland CC: 2014-249040-FC

GLENN ALLEN NORTON,

Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 15, 2016 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS REQUIREDBY**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Steinway MusicalInstruments, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal period ended September 30,2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Dennis M. Hanson, Senior Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that to the best of myknowledge:

 

1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Dennis M. Hanson                 |
|--------|--------------------------------------|
|   |                                 |
|   | Senior Executive Vice  President and |
|   | Chief Financial Officer              |
|   | (Principal Financial  Officer)       |

 

 

November 5, 2010

 

----
Exhibit 10.2

                    AMENDMENT TO EXCLUSIVE LICENSE AGREEMENT

The  Exclusive  License  Agreement  by  and  between,  John &  Katherine  Bracey
(LICENSOR) and Geotheatre  Productions Inc.  (LICENSEE) dated March 13th 2001 is
amended as follows:

The payment or accrual of the minimum  annual  royalty of  $18,000.00  is waived
until January 1, 2004.

Dated: July 11, 2003

Signature: /s/ John Bracey            Signature: /s/ John Bracey
          -------------------------             --------------------------
          /s/ Katherine Bracey                  John Bracey, President
          -------------------------   for Geotheatre Productions Inc. (LICENSEE)
John & Katherine Bracey (LICENSOR)
Antonio PARRA PEREZ, Petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 18-9505

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District denied.
Alan M. BARTLETT, petitioner, v. Susanna C. PINEDA, Judge, Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County, et al.

No. 17-8971.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 09/17/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      836,721
COMMITMENTS
  92,993   20,960  256,673  442,143  511,151  791,808  788,784   44,913   47,937

CHANGES FROM 09/10/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      6,854)
    -437   -9,942   -3,903  -12,727   -5,038  -17,066  -18,883   23,920   25,737

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    11.1      2.5     30.7     52.8     61.1     94.6     94.3      5.4      5.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      142)
      41       29       59       63       64      131      129
```

----

Updated September 20, 2013
Kaitlyn NGUYEN, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 18-1491

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. (the"Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the periodending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, David J. Vogel, President and Director of Citigroup Managed FuturesLLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|           |                                                                                                                     |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and |

|           |                                                                                                                                                        |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Partnership. |

Date: August 15, 2005

/s/ DavidJ. Vogel

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

DavidJ. VogelCitigroup Managed Futures LLC President andDirector

----
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Opinion Research Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas L. Cox, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |         |  |                                                     
|------------------ |  | ------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 13, 2004 |  | Signed: |  | /s/ Douglas L. Cox                                  
|                   |  | Name:   |  | Douglas L. Cox                                      
|                   |  | Title:  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
H. Con. Res. 112 Agreed to August 5, 2014

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That when the House adjourns on any legislative day from 

Monday, August 4, 2014, through Friday, September 5, 2014, on 

a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its 

Majority Leader or his designee, it stand adjourned until 2:00 

p.m. on Monday, September 8, 2014, or until the time of any 

reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 

whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses or 

adjourns on any day from Monday, August 4, 2014, through Friday, 

September 5, 2014, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent 

resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed 

or adjourned until 2:00 p.m. on Monday, September 8, 2014, or 

such other time on that day as may be specified by its Majority 

Leader or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or 

until the time of any reassembly pursuant to section 3 of this 

concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first. 

SEC. 2. (a) The Speaker or his designee, after consultation 

with the Minority Leader of the House, shall notify Members of 

the House to reassemble at such place and time as he may designate 

if, in his opinion, the public interest shall warrant it. 

(b) After reassembling pursuant to subsection (a), when the 

House adjourns on a motion offered pursuant to this subsection 

by its Majority Leader or his designee, the House shall again 

stand adjourned pursuant to the first section of this concurrent 

resolution. 

SEC. 3. (a) The Majority Leader of the Senate or his designee, 

after consultation with the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall 

notify the Members of the Senate to reassemble at such place 

and time as he may designate if, in his opinion, the public interest 

shall warrant it. 

(b) After reassembling pursuant to subsection (a), when the 

Senate adjourns on a motion offered pursuant to this subsection 

by its Majority Leader or his designee, the Senate shall again 

stand adjourned pursuant to the first section of this concurrent 

resolution. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate.
-1-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

THE KRAFT HEINZ COMPANY EMPLOYEE

BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION BOARD,

KRAFT HEINZ COMPANY GROUP 

BENEFITS PLAN, and KRAFT HEINZ 

COMPANY RETIREE GROUP BENEFITS

PLAN,

Plaintiffs,

v.

AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

Defendant.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00317-JRG

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE UNDER RULE 41(a)(1)(A)(i)

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), the Kraft Heinz Company Employee Benefits 

Administration Board, the Kraft Heinz Company Group Benefits Plan, and the Kraft Heinz 

Company Retiree Group Benefits Plan (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), hereby voluntarily dismiss the 

above-captioned action against Aetna Life Insurance Company (“Defendant”) with prejudice to 

refiling. The claims will be arbitrated.

Plaintiffs affirmatively represent that Defendant has not served upon Plaintiffs either an 

answer or motion for summary judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i).

Dated: December 14, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Samuel F. Baxter

Samuel F. Baxter 

Texas State Bar No. 01938000 

sbaxter@mckoolsmith.com 

Jennifer L. Truelove 

Texas State Bar No. 24012906 

jtruelove@mckoolsmith.com 

MCKOOL SMITH, P.C. 

Case 2:23-cv-00317-JRG Document 13 Filed 12/14/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 84
-2-

104 East Houston Street Suite 300 

Marshall, TX 75670 

Telephone: (903) 923-9000 

Facsimile: (903) 923-9099

Jon Corey

(pro hac vice to be filed)

California State Bar No. 185066

jcorey@mckoolsmith.com

MCKOOL SMITH, PC

One California Plaza

300 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2900

Los Angeles, CA 90071

Telephone: (213) 694-1200

Facsimile: (213) 694-1234

Eric B. Halper

New York State Bar No. 3048360

ehalper@mckoolsmith.com 

Radu A. Lelutiu

New York State Bar No. 4252656

rlelutiu@mckoolsmith.com

David I. Schiefelbein

(pro hac vice to be filed)

New York State Bar No. 4767398

dschiefelbein@mckoolsmith.com

Emily B. Tate

New York State Bar No. 5769153

etate@mckoolsmith.com

McKool Smith, PC

One Manhattan West

395 9th Avenue, 50th Floor

New York, NY 10001

Telephone: (212) 402-9400

Facsimile: (212) 402-9444

Attorneys for Plaintiffs The Kraft Heinz 

Company Employee Benefits Administration 

Board, Kraft Heinz Company Group 

Benefits Plan, and Kraft Heinz Company 

Retiree Group Benefits Plan

011168.0000128 DMS 304781013v1

Case 2:23-cv-00317-JRG Document 13 Filed 12/14/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 85
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

SECTION 906CERTIFICATION—CFO

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of J.B. Poindexter & Co., Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert S. Whatley,Vice President Finance of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

To the best of my knowledge,after reasonable investigation:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  April 3, 2008 |   | By  /s/ Robert S. Whatley |
|----------------------|--------|---------------------------|
|                 |   | Robert  S. Whatley,       |
|                 |   | Vice  President Finance   |

 

The foregoing certificationis being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separatedisclosure document.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, orother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TYLER DIVISION

CATHERINE V. FANCIULLO,

Plaintiff,

v. 

SHERIFF BOTIE HILLHOUSE,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:23-CV-00310-JCB

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On June 22, 2023, Plaintiff Catherine Fanciullo, proceeding pro se, filed the instant action 

alleging claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 1.) On June 30, 2023, the court issued an 

order directing Plaintiff to amend her complaint in this matter. (Doc. No. 5.) The court outlined 

the deficiencies in Plaintiff’s complaint and mailed her a copy of the court’s order along with a 

standard section 1983 form. Id. The court ordered Plaintiff to amend her complaint on the standard 

form stating specific facts to support her claims within 30 days of the court’s order. Id. The court 

warned that “[f]ailure to replead in conformity with this order may result in dismissal of the 

complaint.” Id. Plaintiff acknowledged receipt of the court’s order on August 4, 2023. (Doc. No. 

6.) More than 30 days have passed since acknowledgement of the court’s order, and Plaintiff has 

not complied with the court’s order. 

A district court may dismiss an action for the failure of a litigant to prosecute or to comply 

with any order of the court. See McCullough v. Lynaugh, 835 F.2d 1126, 1127 (5th Cir. 1988) 

(“The court possesses the inherent authority to dismiss the action sua sponte, without motion by a 

Case 6:23-cv-00310-JCB-JDL Document 7 Filed 09/13/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 16
2

defendant.”); Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). Here, as discussed above, Plaintiff has failed to comply with an 

order of the court and has failed to prosecute her case. Having not received an amended complaint

by the court-ordered deadline, the court RECOMMENDS that this action be DISMISSED 

without prejudice for failure to comply with a court order and failure to prosecute. 

Within fourteen (14) days after receipt of the Magistrate Judge’s Report, any party may 

serve and file written objections to the findings and recommendations contained in the Report. A 

party’s failure to file written objections to the findings, conclusions and recommendations 

contained in this Report within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy shall bar that 

party from de novo review by the district judge of those findings, conclusions and 

recommendations and, except on grounds of plain error, from appellate review of unobjected-to 

factual findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the district court. Douglass v. 

United States Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996). 

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 13th day of September, 2023.

Case 6:23-cv-00310-JCB-JDL Document 7 Filed 09/13/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 17