alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________ No. 23

- 12965 Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus ARMARD DAVIS, a.k.a. Black Jack,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 5:21

- cr
- 00003

- TES

- CHW

- 4 USCA11 Case: 23-12965 Document: 29-1 Date Filed: 02/06/2024 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 23

- 12965

____________________ Before W ILSON , J ILL P RYOR , and B RANCH , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert , 997 F.2d 1343, 1350

– 51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence app eal waiver will be enforced if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Boyd , 975 F.3d 1185, 1192 (11th Cir. 2020) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced where “it was clearly conveyed to the defendant that he was giving up his right
to a ppeal under most circumstances” (quotation marks omitted, alterations adopted, emphasis in original)); United States v. Grinard

Henry , 399 F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to appeal includes waiver of the right to appeal difficult or d ebatable legal issues or even blatant error). USCA11 Case: 23-12965 Document: 29-1 Date Filed: 02/06/2024 Page: 2 of 2
Oliver Lee WHITE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-723.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Motion for leave to file a brief in opposition under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted. Motion for leave to file a reply brief under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Thomas William CORNELIUS, Jr., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7911.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 6, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 1, 2009

s0901 

# Order

September 1, 2009

138460

SUSAN TKACHIK, Personal Representative of the Estate of JANET ELAINE MANDEVILLE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 138460 COA: 280879 Macomb Probate Court: 03-178658-CZ FRANK MANDEVILLE, JR., Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 5, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed whet her, when a husband has abandoned his wife for the year and a half preceding her death, and the wife alone has made mortgage, tax, and insurance payments on property held as tenants by the entirety, the wife (or her estate) may receive contribution for th e husband’s share of these payments.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 445 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 445

Expressing support for the designation of May 1, 2012, as ``Silver Star 
                         Service Banner Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2012

  Mrs. McCaskill (for herself and Mr. Blunt) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing support for the designation of May 1, 2012, as ``Silver Star 
                         Service Banner Day''.

Whereas the Senate has always honored the sacrifices made by the wounded and ill 
        members of the Armed Forces;
Whereas the Silver Star Service Banner has come to represent the members of the 
        Armed Forces and veterans who were wounded or became ill in combat in 
        the wars fought by the United States;
Whereas the Silver Star Families of America was formed to help the American 
        people remember the sacrifices made by the wounded and ill members of 
        the Armed Forces by designing and manufacturing Silver Star Service 
        Banners and Silver Star Flags for that purpose;
Whereas the sole mission of the Silver Star Families of America is to evoke 
        memories of the sacrifices of members and veterans of the Armed Forces 
        on behalf of the United States through the presence of a Silver Star 
        Service Banner in a window or a Silver Star Flag flying;
Whereas the sacrifices of members and veterans of the Armed Forces on behalf of 
        the United States should never be forgotten; and
Whereas May 1, 2012, is an appropriate date to designate as ``Silver Star 
        Service Banner Day'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate supports the designation of May 1, 2012, 
as ``Silver Star Service Banner Day'' and calls upon the people of the 
United States to observe the day with appropriate programs, ceremonies, 
and activities.
                                 <all>
```
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 Eastern District of Texas Headwater Partners II LLC Cellco Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless, et al 2:24-cv-00007-JRG-RSP Headwater Partners II LLC 04/02/2024 /s/ James Pickens James Pickens CA Bar No. 307474

Russ August & Kabat 

12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90025 jpickens@raklaw.com (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:24-cv-00007-JRG-RSP Document 30 Filed 04/02/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 295
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk July 24, 2012

s0716 

# Order

July 24, 2012

144199

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144199

COA: 304263

Monroe CC: 96

- 027286

- FH;

BASIL PERRY, 96

- 027985

- FH

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 16, 2011

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s

motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
# C_2017048EN.01000901.xml

| 15.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/9

---

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1))

1

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 48/10)

Decisions granting an authorisation

Decisions granting an authorisation

| Reference of the decision (2) | Date of decision | Substance name | Holder of the authorisation | Authorisation number | Authorised use | Date of expiry of review period | Reasons for the decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C(2017) 665 | 8 February 2017 | Sodium chromate
  EC No 231-889-5,
  CAS No 7775-11-3 | Dometic GmbH, |
| In der Steinwiese 16, 57074 Siegen, Germany |

Reference of the decision (2)

2

Date of decision

Substance name

Holder of the authorisation

Authorisation number

Authorised use

Date of expiry of review period

Reasons for the decision

C(2017) 665

8 February 2017

Sodium chromate

EC No 231-889-5,

CAS No 7775-11-3

Dometic GmbH,

In der Steinwiese 16, 57074 Siegen, Germany

REACH/17/7/0

Use of sodium chromate as an anticorrosion agent of the carbon steel cooling system in absorption refrigerators up to 0,75 % by weight (Cr(VI)+) in the cooling solution. This covers the use in ‘low boiler temperature products’ (minibars).

31 December 2019

In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socioeconomic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment arising from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies in terms of their technical and economic feasibility.

Dometic Hűtőgépgyártó és Kereskedelmi Zrt., Necső telep 1, 5100 Jászberény, Hungary

REACH/17/7/1

| Dometic GmbH, |
| --- |
| In der Steinwiese 16, 57074 Siegen, Germany |

Dometic GmbH,

In der Steinwiese 16, 57074 Siegen, Germany

REACH/17/7/2

Use of sodium chromate as an anticorrosion agent of the carbon steel cooling system in absorption refrigerators up to 0,75 % by weight (Cr(VI)+) in the cooling solution. This covers the use in ‘high boiler temperature products’ (recreational vehicles refrigerators and medical cold equipment).

21 September 2029

Dometic Hűtőgépgyártó és Kereskedelmi Zrt., Necső telep 1, 5100 Jászberény, Hungary

REACH/17/7/3

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

1

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/chemicals/reach/about/index_en.htm

2

---
James E. WHITNEY, petitioner, v. Cindy GLOVER, Clerk, Circuit Court of Lincoln County, Arkansas, et al.

No. 18-6736.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and the petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
# C_2017205EN.01005401.xml

| 29.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/54

---

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

(2017/C 205/05)

Pursuant to the second indent of Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1), the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are hereby amended as follows:

1

2

On page 379,
  ‘9403 Other furniture and parts thereof’
  , the following text shall be added after the first paragraph:

On page 379,

‘9403 Other furniture and parts thereof’

, the following text shall be added after the first paragraph:

‘This heading does not include baskets and bags for laundry. For the purposes of Chapter 94 the term “furniture” means any “movable” articles (not included under other more specific headings of the Nomenclature), which are constructed for placing on the floor or ground, and which are used, mainly with a utilitarian purpose, to equip private dwellings, hotels, theatres, etc.

Baskets and bags for laundry are classified according to their constituent material. For example, baskets for laundry of iron or steel are classified as other household articles under heading 7323 (which includes baskets for laundry, see the HS Explanatory Note (HSEN) to heading 7323 (A) (3)), and baskets for laundry of plaiting materials are classified under heading 4602 (which includes baskets of all kinds, see the HSEN to heading 4602 (1)).

Examples of baskets and bags for laundry which are to be classified according to their constituent material:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Of willow, inner side lined with cotton, height: 66 cm. | Of textile, mounted on a wooden construction, height: 69 cm. | Of stainless steel, no lining, height: 60 cm. |
| Heading 4602 . | Heading 6307 (the essential character is provided by the textile bag, which holds the laundry, as the article would not function without the textile bag). | Heading 7323 .’ |

Image

Image

Image

Of willow, inner side lined with cotton, height: 66 cm.

Of textile, mounted on a wooden construction, height: 69 cm.

Of stainless steel, no lining, height: 60 cm.

Heading 4602 .

Heading 6307 (the essential character is provided by the textile bag, which holds the laundry, as the article would not function without the textile bag).

Heading 7323 .’

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1).

1

(2)  OJ C 76, 4.3.2015, p. 1.

2

---
Vincent ASARO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-107

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Harlow HUTCHINSON, Petitioner v. LOUISIANA

No. 19-5693

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

The petition for rehearing is denied.
PRIME RETAIL, INC.
            EXHIBIT 12: COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED
                 FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK DISTRIBUTIONS
                                  AND DIVIDENDS

              (Amounts in thousands, except for ratio information)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Six Months Ended June 30                                 2001              2000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Loss before minority interests                        $ (12,874)      $ (27,446)
Gain on sale of real estate                                (552)              -
Interest incurred                                        45,756          49,801
Amortization of debt issuance costs                       3,659           1,743
Less capitalized interest                                     -          (2,359)
                                                      ---------       ---------
     Earnings                                            35,989          21,739
                                                      ---------       ---------
Interest incurred                                        45,756          49,801
Amortization of debt issuance costs                       3,659           1,743
Preferred stock distributions and dividends              11,336          11,336
                                                      ---------       ---------
     Combined Fixed Charges and
       Preferred Stock Distributions and Dividends       60,751          62,880
                                                      ---------       ---------
Excess of Combined Fixed Charges
     and Preferred Stock Distributions
     and Dividends over Earnings                      $ (24,762)      $ (41,141)
                                                      =========       =========
================================================================================
**Exhibit31.1**

 

I, Dana D. Messina, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SteinwayMusical Instruments, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: November 4, 2004 |                          |   |
|------------------------|-------------------------------|--------|
|                   | /s/ Dana D. Messina           |   |
|                   | Dana D. Messina               |
|                   | Director, President and Chief |
|                   | Executive Officer             |
|                   |                          |   |

 

----
IN TLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR HE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

CHRIS REMLEY

§

§

§

§

No. 4:23-CRjudge

FACTUAL BASIS

The defendant, CHRIS REMLEY, hereby stipulates and agrees that at all times

relevant to the Information, the following facts were true:

1. lam the same person charged in the Information, and I am pleading guilty to

Count One, Engaging in the Business Without a License (Firearms).

2. The events described in the Information occurred in the Eastern District of Texas

and elsewhere.

3. lam not currently, nor have I ever been licensed to deal firearms within the

meaning of Chapter 44, Title 18 United States Code.

4. From October 2021 through January 2022,1 willfully engaged in the business of

dealing firearms. During that time, I sold approximately 62 firearms for profit.

5. Any firearms that were purchased from Thomas Harris, Sporting Arms Company

FFL, were done so with Harris full knowledge that they would be resold for profit

and that I was not the true purchaser/transferee. With Harris full knowledge and

aid, I would falsely state on the 4473 that I was the true purchaser/transferee.

Factual Basis - Page 1

Case 4:23-cr-00263-ALM-AGD Document 10 Filed 12/18/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 25
DEFENDANT S SIGNATURE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT

I have read or had read to me this factual basis and have discussed it with my

attorney. I fully understand the contents of it and agree without reservation that it

accurately describes the events and my acts.

Dated:

CHRIS REMLEY

Defendant

DEFENDANT’S COUNSEL’S SIGNATURE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT

I have read this factual basis and have reviewe it with the defendant. Based upon

my discussions with the defendant, I am satisfied that the defendant understands it.

Dated: 

ID MEDDERS

Attorney for the Defendant

Factual Basis - Page 2

Case 4:23-cr-00263-ALM-AGD Document 10 Filed 12/18/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 26
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-30805

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LEILA J LEWIS

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:06-CR-30025-1

Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Leila J. Lewis has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Lewis has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 20, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
Daejerron L. VALENTINE, Petitioner, v. NEBRASKA.

No. 19-7950.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 6, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Nebraska denied.