alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
De Min GU, petitioner, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, et al.

No. 17-8962.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 1, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 33219]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11793]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., June 8, 2022.

PLACE: Members of the public wishing to attend the meeting must submit 
a written request at least 24 hours prior to the meeting to receive 
dial-in information. All requests must be sent to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ffac9a9c8d9a8b9e8d868b908b979abd909e8d9bbf8d8d9dd1989089"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="88dbedebfaedfce9faf1fce7fce0edcae7e9faecc8fafaeaa6efe7fe">[email protected]</span></a>.

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
1. SCOTUS Update
2. Disposition of Current Matters with Two Concurring Votes
3. FY 22 Hiring Progress
4. Legislative Report from Office of Legislative Affairs

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Stephanie Hillyard, Secretary to 
the Board, (312) 751-4920.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: May 26, 2022.
Stephanie Hillyard,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. 2022-11793 Filed 5-27-22; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Equity Marketing, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "Report"), I, Donald
A. Kurz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company

                               /s/ Donald A. Kurz
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Donald A. Kurz
                               Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: May 17, 2004
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

Ricky Lance Miller, individually and as * From the 3 9 th District Court

t rustee for the Nannie Lou Miller Family of Haskell County

Trust, et al., Trial Court No. 11,977

- A

.

Vs . No. 11

- 16

- 00030

- CV * June 14

, 2018

Patricia Miller Laughlin, individually and * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

as t rustee for the Nannie Lou Miller (Panel consists of: Willson, J.,

Trust, and Tonya Miller, individually and Bailey, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

as independent e xecutrix of the Estate of sitting by assignment)

Ga r y Bruce Miller, deceased.

This court ha s c onsidered Appellant s ’ motion to dismiss this appeal and

concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in accordance with this

court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The cost s incurred by reason of this

appeal are taxed against the party incurring same

.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

REGINO NUNEZ JR. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NUMBER 6:23-CR-00128-JDK 

ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S 

REPORT AND FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY 

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable John D. Love, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed 

by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate 

Judge recommended that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant 

guilty on Count One of the Information. 

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings. 

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea 

of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers 

acceptance of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Regino Nunez 

Jr. GUILTY of Count One of the Information, charging a violation of Title 21 U.S.C. § 

841(a)(1) - Possession with the Intent to Distribute and Distribution of Cocaine. 

So ORDERED and SIGNED this day of

___________________________________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8th January, 2024.

Case 6:23-cr-00128-JDK-JDL Document 12 Filed 01/08/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 31
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

January 6 , 2017

No. 04

- 16

- 00755

- CV

IN THE ESTATE OF AMINITA P EREZ

- MUZZA, DECEASED

From the County Court at Law No 2, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2007PB7000089 L2

Honorable Jesus Garza, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R O F R E F E R R A L

After reviewing the parties’ responses to this court’s prior order, the court has determined

this appeal is appropriate for referral to alternative dispute resolution. TEX. CIV. PRAC. &

REM. CODE § 154.021(a); 4TH TEX. APP. (SAN ANTONIO) LOC. R. 2. It is therefore

ORDERED that this appeal is referre d to a mediated settlement conference to be conducted by

Eric Galton of Lakeside Mediation Center, 3825 Lake Austin Blvd., Ste. 403 Austin, TX 78703,

the Mediator selected by the parties.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that all appellate deadlines are hereby su spended until

February 20, 2017

.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that mediation shall commence at such place as the Mediator

may designate and proceed in accordance with the schedule set by the Mediator until completed,

but in any event the mediation shall be comp leted no later than forty

- five (45) days from the date

of this Order. The Mediator shall file with the Clerk of Court within three (3) days of the

completion of the mediation a written report concerning the disposition of this appeal.

It is FURTHER ORDER ED that the Mediator shall be compensated and that parties in

this cause shall be equally responsible for its share of this obligation. Mediation fees shall

ultimately be taxed as court costs. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 154.054.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that all parties to this cause are directed to attend the

mediated settlement conference with their counsel of record. The corporate party representative

in attendance and the individual party representatives shall have full authority to settle up to and

i ncluding the judgment amount. To facilitate this procedure, the Mediator shall encourage and

assist, but will not compel or coerce the parties in reaching a settlement of the dispute. Unless the

parties otherwise agree, all matters, including the conduct a nd demeanor of the parties and their

counsel during mediation, shall remain confidential and shall never be disclosed to anyone,

including this court. See id. § 154.053.If the parties are able to settle all matters related to this appeal, the parties a re directed to

file a joint motion requesting an appropriate disposition of this appeal within thirty (30) days of

the date of mediation.

It is so ORDERED on January 6 , 2017.

___________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 6 th day of January, 2017

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
Tajuddin SALAHUDDIN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7836.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 6, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
THOMAS GROSS,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-2656

Opinion filed September 16, 2014.

Petition for Belated Appeal -- Original Jurisdiction.

Thomas Gross, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kristen Bonjour, Assistant Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition seeking a belated appeal of the order denying motion for 

postconviction relief rendered December 19, 2013, in Duval County Circuit Court case 

number 16-2009-CF-009828-AXXX-MA is granted. Upon issuance of mandate, a 

copy of this opinion shall be furnished to the clerk of the lower tribunal for treatment 

as a notice of appeal. 

PADOVANO, THOMAS, and ROBERTS, JJ., CONCUR.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>




                                  Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Environmental  Service
Professionals, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,
2009 (the "Report") I, Edward L. Torres,  Chief Executive  Officer and President
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated:   May 22, 2009


/s/ Edward L. Torres
-------------------------------------------------------
Edward L. Torres, Chief Executive Officer and President

         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2285

To amend the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of

1992 to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in the

design, planning, and construction of the San Antonio Water System

Water Recycling Project Phase III for the reclamation and reuse of

water, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 18, 1999

Mr. RODRIGUEZ (for himself, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. BONILLA, and Mr.

GONZALEZ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

A BILL

To amend the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992 to authorize the Secretary of the

Interior to participate in the design, planning, and construction of the San Antonio Water System Water Recycling Project Phase III for the reclamation and reuse

of water, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2285 IH

1 SECTION 1. SAN ANTONIO WATER SYSTEM WATER RECY2 CLING PROJECT PHASE III.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title XVI of the Reclamation

4 Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992 (43

5 U.S.C. 390h et seq.) is amended by adding at the end

6 the following:

7 ‘‘SEC. 1635. SAN ANTONIO WATER SYSTEM WATER RECY8 CLING PROJECT PHASE III.

9 ‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary, in coopera10 tion with the appropriate State and local authorities, is

11 authorized to participate in the design, planning, and con12 struction of the San Antonio Water System Water Recy13 cling Project Phase III to reclaim and reuse wastewater

14 within and outside of the service area of the City of San

15 Antonio, Texas.

16 ‘‘(b) COST SHARE.—The Federal share of the cost

17 of a project described in subsection (a) shall not exceed

18 25 percent of the total cost.

19 ‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—The Secretary shall not provide

20 funds for the operation and maintenance of a project de21 scribed in subsection (a).’’.

22 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

23 in section 2 of that Act is amended by inserting after the

24 item relating to section 1634 the following:

‘‘Sec. 1635. San Antonio Water System Water Recycling Project Phase III.’’.

Æ
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 496 

Observing the historical significance of Juneteenth Independence Day. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 19, 2012 

Mr. LEVIN (for himself, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. CARDIN, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. 

CORNYN, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mrs. BOXER, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. BEGICH, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. WARNER, Mr. WEBB, Mr. NELSON

of Florida, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. CASEY, Mr. WICKER, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. SCHUMER, and Mrs. GILLIBRAND) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Observing the historical significance of Juneteenth 

Independence Day. 

Whereas news of the end of slavery did not reach frontier 

areas of the United States, and in particular the Southwestern States, for more than 21⁄2 years after President 

Abraham Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation, which 

was issued on January 1, 1863, and months after the 

conclusion of the Civil War; 

Whereas, on June 19, 1865, Union soldiers led by Major 

General Gordon Granger arrived in Galveston, Texas, 

with news that the Civil War had ended and that the 

enslaved were free; 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 496 ATS 

Whereas African Americans who had been slaves in the 

Southwest celebrated June 19, commonly known as 

‘‘Juneteenth Independence Day’’, as the anniversary of 

their emancipation; 

Whereas African Americans from the Southwest continue the 

tradition of celebrating Juneteenth Independence Day as 

inspiration and encouragement for future generations; 

Whereas, for more than 145 years, Juneteenth Independence 

Day celebrations have been held to honor African-American freedom while encouraging self-development and respect for all cultures; and 

Whereas the faith and strength of character demonstrated by 

former slaves remain an example for all people of the 

United States, regardless of background, religion, or 

race: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That— 

2 (1) the Senate— 

3 (A) recognizes the historical significance of 

4 Juneteenth Independence Day to the Nation; 

5 (B) supports the continued celebration of 

6 Juneteenth Independence Day to provide an op7 portunity for the people of the United States to 

8 learn more about the past and to better under9 stand the experiences that have shaped the Na10 tion; and 

11 (C) encourages the people of the United 

12 States to observe Juneteenth Independence Day 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 496 ATS 

1 with appropriate ceremonies, activities, and pro2 grams; and 

3 (2) it is the sense of the Senate that— 

4 (A) the celebration of the end of slavery is 

5 an important and enriching part of the history 

6 and heritage of the United States; and 

7 (B) history should be regarded as a means 

8 for understanding the past and solving the chal9 lenges of the future. 

Æ 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 4.1


 


Advisors Asset Management, Inc.

18925 Base Camp Road

Monument, Colorado 80132


March 25, 2019


 


Advisors Disciplined Trust 1932


c/o The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee


BNY Atlantic Terminal


2 Hanson Place, 12th Floor


Brooklyn, New York 11217


 


Re:  Advisors Disciplined Trust 1932 (the “Fund”)


Ladies and Gentlemen:


We have examined
the Registration Statement File No. 333-229064 for the above captioned Fund. We hereby consent to the use in the Registration Statement
of the references to Advisors Asset Management, Inc. as evaluator.


You are hereby authorized
to file a copy of this letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 
	 	Advisors Asset Management, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By	/s/ ALEX R. MEITZNER
	 	 	Alex R. Meitzner
	 	 	Senior Vice President
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, William Dean Singleton, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of MediaNews Group, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: March 30, 2006       /s/ William Dean Singleton   William Dean Singleton
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

RAVENWHITE LICENSING LLC §

§

V. § 2 :23-CV-423-JRG-RSP

§ (Lead Case)

THE HOME DEPOT, INC. ET AL §

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RAVENWHITE LICENSING LLC §

§

V. § 2:23-CV-418-JRG-RSP

§ (Member Case)

WALMART INC., ET AL §

PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL 

OF DERON R. DACUS AS COUNSEL 

Plaintiff Ravenwhite Licensing LLC (“Ravenwhite”) files this Unopposed Motion for 

Withdrawal of Deron R. Dacus as counsel in the above-referenced matters. In support of this 

Motion, Plaintiff shows the Court the following:

1. Deron R. Dacus, having appeared in the above-captioned cases on behalf of 

Plaintiff Ravenwhite, will no longer act as counsel for Plaintiff Ravenwhite in these actions.

2. Plaintiff Ravenwhite will continue to be represented by the law firm of Kramer 

Alberti Lim & Tonkovick LLP.

3. The withdrawal of Deron R. Dacus as counsel for Plaintiff Ravenwhite will not 

delay the proceedings in this matter.

4. Defendants do not oppose the withdrawal of Deron R. Dacus as counsel for Plaintiff 

Ravenwhite. 

5. Therefore, Plaintiff Ravenwhite requests that this Unopposed Motion for 

Case 2:23-cv-00423-JRG-RSP Document 57 Filed 05/17/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 484
2

Withdrawal of Deron R. Dacus as counsel be granted and he be removed from the official service 

list in this case.

Respectfully submitted, 

DATED: May 17, 2024

/s/ Deron R. Dacus

Deron R. Dacus (TX Bar No. 00790553)

THE DACUS FIRM, P.C.

821 ESE Loop 323, Suite 430

Tyler, TX 75701

Telephone: 903-705-7233

Email: ddacus@dacusfirm.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document has been 

served on May 17, 2024 to all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic 

service via the Court’s CM/ECF system.

/s/ Deron R. Dacus__________

Deron R. Dacus 

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

The undersigned certifies that Plaintiff Ravenwhite’s counsel has complied with the meet 

and confer requirement in Local Rule CV-7(h) and that the foregoing motion is unopposed. The 

parties met and conferred via email and counsel for Defendants stated that they do not oppose 

this motion.

/s/ Deron R. Dacus

Deron R. Dacus

Case 2:23-cv-00423-JRG-RSP Document 57 Filed 05/17/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 485
No. 84-6854.

#### Beck *v.*Missouri.

Sup. Ct. Mo. Certiorari denied.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00375-CR

Wallace Wayne Bowman, Jr.

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 97th District Court

of Montague County (2008-

0000144M-CR)

August 29, 2013

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for 

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
Keon Anthony NIXON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5009

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
### Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(r eleased the week prior to October 9, 2018 

### )

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES :



### A

- 18

- 101 State v. Policky

The above

- listed memorandum opinions c an be viewed online through the appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebra ska.gov: http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/

.

Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here: http s ://www.nebraska.gov/courts/s c cales/

.
No. 85-1510.

#### Christy Newsreel Services, Inc. *v.*City of Ann Arbor.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 06-1558

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, Appellee,

v.

MANUEL A. VEGA-SANTIAGO,

Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA

The opinion issued on February 21, 2008, is amended as

follows:

On page 6, line 1 of footnote 3, replace the citation

"32(i)(C)" with the citation "32(i)(1)(C)."
Peter Mark LEE, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 17-1514.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District denied.