alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 101 

Expressing the sense of Congress that Warren Weinstein should be returned 

home to his family. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 11, 2014 

Mr. DELANEY submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that Warren Weinstein 

should be returned home to his family. 

Whereas Warren Weinstein was abducted in Pakistan in 

2011 and is currently being held captive by al-Qaeda; 

Whereas Warren Weinstein is a former Peace Corps and 

former United States Agency for International Development official; 

Whereas Warren Weinstein is widely recognized as a scholar 

and humanitarian who has spent his career working to 

improve the lives of men, women, and children around 

the world; and 

Whereas video released of Warren Weinstein by his captors 

confirms that he is in poor health: Now, therefore, be it 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 101 IH 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that the Ad3 ministration should— 

4 (1) use all of the lawful tools at its disposal to 

5 bring Warren Weinstein home to his family; 

6 (2) make the return of all United States citi7 zens held captive abroad, regardless of their dif8 ferent circumstances, a top priority; and 

9 (3) keep Congress apprised of its actions to 

10 achieve these goals as new information is available, 

11 or quarterly if no new information is available. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8542

DAVID CRUMP, a/k/a David Lee Crump, Sr.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DOCTOR ARGARWAL, Deputy Director of N.C. Department of Corrections Healthcare; BOYD BENNETT, Director for N.C. Department of Corrections; CARLTON B. JOYNER, Director of Case Management; STEVE BAILEY, Western Regional Area Director for N.C. Department of Corrections; SID HARKELROAD, a/k/a Sidney Harkelroad, Superintendent at Marion Correctional Institution,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00495-GCM)

Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 8, 2009

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Crump, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

David Crump appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Crump

v. Argarwal , No. 1:08-cv-00495-GCM (W.D.N.C. Dec. 1, 2008). We

deny Crump’s pending motion to compel. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 03/19/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       85,452
COMMITMENTS
  23,569    2,428      390   56,352   80,053   80,311   82,871    5,141    2,581

CHANGES FROM 03/12/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -22,255)
  -1,819   -2,363   -1,402  -18,084  -17,954  -21,305  -21,719     -950     -536

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    27.6      2.8      0.5     65.9     93.7     94.0     97.0      6.0      3.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       69)
       9        4        1       38       32       47       37
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 03/19/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      191,044
COMMITMENTS
  62,501   31,601    1,041  112,040  154,517  175,582  187,159   15,462    3,885

CHANGES FROM 03/12/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -38,489)
  -1,367    3,184   -9,773  -16,496  -21,275  -27,636  -27,864  -10,853  -10,625

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    32.7     16.5      0.5     58.6     80.9     91.9     98.0      8.1      2.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      142)
      38       15        7       65       46      106       65
```

----

Updated March 22, 2013
Tami L. MITCHELL, Petitioner, v. Thomas M. DILLAHUNT.

No. 19-1034.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Minnesota denied.
Andrew D. DIXON, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9760

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit
23.1





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





As
independent registered public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the following registration statements of our
report dated December 29, 2008 included in Onstream Media's Corporation's Form
10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2008.





*        Registration
statement on Form S-8, SEC file number 333-63822, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on June 25, 2001,





*        Registration
statement on Form S-3, SEC file number 333-63792, as declared effective by the
Securities and Exchange Commission on July 2, 2001,





*        Registration
statement on Form S-8, SEC file number 333-64588, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on July 3, 2001,





*        Registration
statement on Form S-3, SEC file number 333-71308, as declared effective by the
Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2001,





*        Registration
statement on Form S-3, SEC file number 333-89042, as declared effective by the
Securities and Exchange Commission on June 7, 2002,





*        Registration
statement on Form S-3, SEC file number 333-18819, as declared effective by the
Securities and Exchange Commission on July 30, 2002,





*        Registration
statement on Form S-3, SEC file number 333-92064, as declared effective by the
Securities and Exchange Commission on August 21, 2002,





*        Registration
statement on Form S-3, SEC file number 333-104588, as declared effective by the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 2, 2003,





*        Registration
statement on Form S-3, SEC file number 333-106516, as declared effective by the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 2, 2003,





*        Registration
statement on Form S-3, SEC file number 333-110142, as declared effective by the
Securities and Exchange Commission on November 12, 2003,





*        Registration
statement on Form S-3, SEC file number 333-124002, as declared effective by the
Securities and Exchange Commission on June 29, 2005,





*        Registration
statement on Form S-3, SEC file number 333-134900, as declared effective by the
Securities and Exchange Commission on July 26, 2006, and





*        Registration
statement on Form S-3, SEC file number 333-143287, as declared effective by the
Securities and Exchange Commission on June 14, 2007.


/s/
Goldstein Lewin & Co.





GOLDSTEIN
LEWIN & CO.


Certified
Public Accountants


Boca
Raton, Florida,


December 29,
2008
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

T-MOBILE USA, INC. and SPRINT 

CORP.,

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00379-JRG-RSP

(Lead Case)

JURY DEMANDED

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

T-MOBILE USA, INC. and SPRINT 

CORP.,

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00377-JRG-RSP

(Member Case)

JURY DEMANDED

DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO WITHDRAW MOTION FOR

ENTRY OF AN ORDER FOCUSING ASSERTED PATENT CLAIM AND 

PRIOR ART (Dkt. 58)

The Defendants hereby move to withdraw their Motion for Entry of an Order Focusing 

Asserted Patent Claim and Prior Art (Dkt. 58) as moot. The Parties have resolved all issues raised 

in that motion without the necessity of the Court’s intervention. Plaintiff is unopposed to this 

motion.

Dated: October 7, 2024 Respectfully submitted, 

________________________

Katherine Q. Dominguez (Lead Attorney)

kdominguez@gibsondunn.com

Josh A. Krevitt

jkrevitt@gibsondunn.com

/s/ Katherine Q. Dominguez

Case 2:23-cv-00379-JRG-RSP Document 88 Filed 10/07/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 4950
2

Brian Rosenthal

brosenthal@gibsondunn.com

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

200 Park Avenue

New York, New York 10166-0193

Telephone: (212) 351-4000

Facsimile: (212) 351-4015

Robert Vincent

rvincent@gibsondunn.com

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 2100

Dallas, Texas 75201-2923

Telephone: (214) 698-3100 

Facsimile: (214) 571-2900 

Andrew Robb

arobb@gibsondunn.com

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

310 University Avenue

Palo Alto, CA 94301

Telephone: (650) 849-5300 

Melissa R. Smith

Texas Bar No. 24001351

melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com

GILLIAM & SMITH, LLP

303 South Washington Avenue

Marshall, Texas 75670

Telephone: 903-934-8450

Facsimile: 903-934-9257

Attorneys for Defendants

Case 2:23-cv-00379-JRG-RSP Document 88 Filed 10/07/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 4951
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on this 7

th day of October, 2024, all counsel of record who 

are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document 

through the Court's CM/ECF system under Local Rule CV-5(a)(3). 

/s/ Melissa R. Smith

Melissa R. Smith

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE 

The undersigned hereby certifies that counsel for the T-Mobile met and conferred with 

counsel for Headwater to discuss the substance of this Motion pursuant to Local Rule CV-7(h). 

Counsel for Headwater indicated that Headwater is unopposed to the relief sought in this Motion. 

________________________

Melissa R. Smith

/s/ Melissa R. Smith

Case 2:23-cv-00379-JRG-RSP Document 88 Filed 10/07/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 4952
1

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION

File Name: 10a0069n.06

No. 10-3098

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

LAWRENCE REYNOLDS,

Plaintiff,

MARK BROWN,

Intervenor - Appellant,

v.

TED STRICKLAND, TERRY J. COLLINS,

PHILLIP KERNS, and EXECUTION TEAM

MEMBERS #1-21,

Defendants-Appellees.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED

STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF 

OHIO

ORDER

Before: BATCHELDER, Chief Circuit Judge; SILER and SUTTON, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM. The motion by the appellant, Mark Brown, for a stay of execution is

denied, and the panel affirms the district court for the reasons set forth in the district court opinion,

Reynolds (Brown) v. Strickland, No. 2:10-cv-27 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 2, 2010), and in our recent opinion

in Cooey (Biros) v. Strickland, 589 F.3d 210 (6th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
|  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                |   |                                                                         |   |
|---------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: July 22, 2010 | By:    | /s/Kent Rodriguez                                                            |   |
|                |   | Kent Rodriguez                                                               |   |
|                |   | Chief Executive Officer, President,Secretary and Principal Financial Officer |   |
Tower Lease Agreement between Indosat and PT Hutchison CP Telecommunications



 Exhibit 4.6 
 Tower Lease Agreement 
 The first amendment of tower lease agreement between
PT Indosat Tbk (“Indosat”) and PT Hutchison CP Telecommunications (“HCPT”) No. Indosat: 948A/C00-C0DA/LGL/11 – No. HCPT: 404/LGL-AMD1-Tower/PT. Indosat, Tbk./RS-MM/Tech/VIII/11 dated August 18, 2011. 

The Parties: 
  

	1.	 Indosat; and 


  

	2.	 HCPT 


 Scope of
The Amendment 
 This first amendment was made to amend as follows: 

 

	1.	 Compensation to Landlord and/or community; 


  

	2.	 Tower Strengthening; 


  

	3.	 Term of Payment; 


  

	4.	 Put on an addition definition clause 


 Period of Amendment: 
 This third amendment effective on
August 18, 2011 and have same expiration date as Tower Lease Agreement.
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/30/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      388,083
COMMITMENTS
 104,373  168,708   85,197  173,916  105,417  363,486  359,322   24,597   28,761

CHANGES FROM 04/23/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      6,492)
   9,033    2,995   12,845  -16,026  -11,624    5,852    4,216      640    2,276

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    26.9     43.5     22.0     44.8     27.2     93.7     92.6      6.3      7.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      165)
      54       63       76       36       34      134      140
```

----

Updated May 3, 2013
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 19 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 19

 Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater Washington 
                            Soap Box Derby.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 26, 2013

   Mr. Hoyer (for himself, Mr. Moran, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Wolf, Ms. 
   Edwards, Mr. Connolly, Ms. Norton, and Mr. Delaney) submitted the 
following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater Washington 
                            Soap Box Derby.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR SOAP BOX DERBY RACES.

    (a) In General.--The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Association 
(in this resolution referred to as the ``sponsor'') shall be permitted 
to sponsor a public event, soap box derby races (in this resolution 
referred to as the ``event''), on the Capitol Grounds.
    (b) Date of Event.--The event shall be held on June 15, 2013, or on 
such other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate jointly designate.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board, the event shall be--
            (1) free of admission charge and open to the public; and
            (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The sponsor shall assume full 
responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all 
activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the 
sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, 
sound amplification devices, and other related structures and equipment 
as may be required for the event.

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

    The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board are 
authorized to make such additional arrangements as may be required to 
carry out the event.

SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1996
<CASH>                                             174
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,641
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     39,935
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,816
<PP&E>                                          49,908
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,395
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  98,532
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,170
<BONDS>                                         33,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            70
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,375
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    98,532
<SALES>                                        116,759
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               116,759
<CGS>                                           86,123
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,789
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1597
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (750)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (277)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (473)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (473)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Tasheena V. STEWART, Petitioner v. DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MARY HITCHCOCK MEMORIAL HOSPITAL

No. 19-5116

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Therian WIMBUSH, Petitioner, v. Christopher M. CARR, Attorney General of Georgia, et al.

No. 19-5210

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia denied.
Exhibit 10.94

FIRST AMENDMENT TO LOAN AGREEMENT


     This First
Amendment to Loan Agreement (the “Amendment”) is made as of November 16, 2011,
between Bank of America, N. A. (“Bank”) and Move, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(“Borrower”). 

RECITALS 

    
A. Borrower and Bank entered into that certain Loan Agreement dated as of
September 20, 2011 (the “Agreement”) pursuant to which Bank has extended certain
credit facilities to Borrower. 

    
B. Borrower and Bank desire to amend and modify the provisions of the
Agreement, as herein provided.

AGREEMENT 

    
1. Definitions. Capitalized terms used
but not defined in this Amendment shall have the meaning given to them in the
Agreement. 

    
2. Amendments. The Agreement is hereby
amended as follows: 

         
2.1 In
Section 8.5 of the Agreement, the definition of "Adjusted EBITDA" is amended in
full to read as follows:

     "Adjusted EBITDA" means, on a
consolidated basis for the twelve-month period then ended, earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, non-cash expenses, and
amortization related to stock based compensation and other non-cash charges (i)
minus the following to the extent included in calculating such consolidated net
income: Federal, state and local tax credits and all non-cash items increasing
consolidated net income, and (ii) plus the following: cash dividends or
distributions received from joint ventures.

    
3. Representations and Warranties.
Borrower hereby represents and warrants to Bank that: (i) no default specified in the
Agreement and no event which with notice or lapse of time or both would become
such a default has occurred and is continuing and has not been previously
waived, (ii) the representations and warranties of Borrower pursuant to the
Agreement are true on and as of the date hereof as if made on and as of said
date, (iii) the making and performance by Borrower of this Amendment has been
duly authorized by all necessary action, and (iv) no consent, approval,
authorization, permit or license is required in connection with the making or
performance of the Agreement as amended hereby. 

    
4. Conditions. This Amendment will be
effective when the Bank receives the following items, in form and content
acceptable to the Bank. 

         
4.1 This
Amendment duly executed by all parties hereto. 

1 







          4.2 Payment of all out-of-pocket expenses, including attorneys’ fees,
incurred by the Bank in connection with the preparation of this Amendment.


    
5. Effect
of Amendment. Except as provided in this
Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and shall be
performed by the parties hereto according to its terms and provisions.


    
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed by the parties
hereto as of the date first above written. 

	BANK:	   
                  	BORROWER:
	 
	Bank of America, N.A.		MOVE, INC.,
				a Delaware corporation
	 
	 
	 
	By:	/s/ Sarah Daniel	 	By:	/s/ Patricia Wehr
	Name:  	Sarah Daniel		Name:  	Patricia Wehr
	Title:	Vice President		Title:	Chief Accounting Officer



2