alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
William Lee THOMPSON, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-9274

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/13/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       40,863
COMMITMENTS
   2,688    5,868    2,556   35,595   32,368   40,839   40,792       24       71

CHANGES FROM 08/06/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      9,632)
     569       21      417    8,663    9,189    9,649    9,627      -17        5

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     6.6     14.4      6.3     87.1     79.2     99.9     99.8      0.1      0.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       40)
       8        8        7       18       17       29       29`

---

Updated August 16, 2013
FIVE STAR SENIOR LIVING INC., fka Five Star Quality Care, Inc., petitioner, v. Lourdes LEFEVRE.

No. 17-1470.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Daniel RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8053.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Barbara Nina DAVIS, Petitioner, v. MTGLQ INVESTORS, L.P.

No. 19-703.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                           6,113
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,513
<ALLOWANCES>                                       405
<INVENTORY>                                     46,722
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                71,551
<PP&E>                                          67,438
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,320
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 121,388
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,411
<BONDS>                                         26,953
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            82
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,562
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   121,388
<SALES>                                        166,612
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               166,612
<CGS>                                          116,616
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  116,616
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,388
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,794
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,037
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,757
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,757
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.20


</TABLE>
Starquineshia PALMER, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-9516

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District denied.
Case 5:23-cv-00097-RWS   Document 1   Filed 09/25/23   Page 1 of 8 PageID #:  1

Case 5:23-cv-00097-RWS   Document 1   Filed 09/25/23   Page 2 of 8 PageID #:  2

Case 5:23-cv-00097-RWS   Document 1   Filed 09/25/23   Page 3 of 8 PageID #:  3

Case 5:23-cv-00097-RWS   Document 1   Filed 09/25/23   Page 4 of 8 PageID #:  4

Case 5:23-cv-00097-RWS   Document 1   Filed 09/25/23   Page 5 of 8 PageID #:  5

Case 5:23-cv-00097-RWS   Document 1   Filed 09/25/23   Page 6 of 8 PageID #:  6

Case 5:23-cv-00097-RWS   Document 1   Filed 09/25/23   Page 7 of 8 PageID #:  7

Case 5:23-cv-00097-RWS   Document 1   Filed 09/25/23   Page 8 of 8 PageID #:  8
Unassociated Document


Exhibit 10.17







MEMO FROM SIBLING ENTERTAINMENT HOLDINGS, INC.







Date: October 24, 2011







From: Gerald Sullivan, Chairman







TO:   Steve Carlson







RE: Conversion of Debt







As Chairman of Sibling Entertainment, I want to thank you for your willingness to help us by agreeing to accept shares of the common stock of SIBE in exchange for our obligations to you. Please accept this as support for the issuance as noted below:







On October 24, 2011, the Company entered into an agreement Stephen C. Carlson, CEO, pursuant to which the Company issued 200,000 shares of common stock valued at $40,000, as an


incentive bonus. These were issued on October 24, 2011.







Please note that these shares are restricted under Rule 144 and cannot be traded for at least six (6) months. Also note that the stock trades infrequently, and there may be no trading market for the shares when you are ready to trade. Also note that the Series common stock, which you are an owner of, may convert into common stock and that event may cause dilution to the common stock, and reduce the share price, or market for the stock.












Thanks again, and I look forward to working with you going forward.







/s/ GERALD F. SULLIVAN


Gerald F. Sullivan


Chairman
Kelly H. TUCKER, petitioner, v. Patrick ATWATER, Jr., et al.

No. 18-282.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AVONDALE, INC. FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED NOVEMBER 26, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-25-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-26-1999
<CASH>                                           4,882
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,858
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,893
<INVENTORY>                                    117,607
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               174,250
<PP&E>                                         570,009
<DEPRECIATION>                                 316,684
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 447,286
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           82,311
<BONDS>                                        214,325
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           127
<OTHER-SE>                                     110,027
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   447,286
<SALES>                                        202,873
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               202,873
<CGS>                                          165,469
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  185,830
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,497
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   389
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,287
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,259
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,020
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,239
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,239
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .48


</TABLE>
Kyle Jason KORTE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5283

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
_______________________________________ __ Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 28, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh 127904 Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 127904 COA: 249903 Wayne CC: 02-013992-02 WILLIAM JAMES DIGNA, II, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e December 14, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0919 I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 28, 2005

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 107 (Friday, June 3, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 33866]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11949]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 11755]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Being 
Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: ``Wolfgang Tillmans: To Look 
Without Fear'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad 
pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for 
temporary display in the exhibition ``Wolfgang Tillmans: To Look 
Without Fear'' at The Museum of Modern Art, New York, New York, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of 
cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or 
display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chi D. Tran, Program Administrator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cebdabadbaa7a1a0fcfafbf78ebdbaafbaabe0a9a1b8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a7d4c2c4d3cec8c99593929ee7d4d3c6d3c289c0c8d1">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the 
Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, 
et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 
of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 
2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.

Stacy E. White,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2022-11949 Filed 6-2-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
BOSTON FINANCIAL TAX CREDIT FUND VIII, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Financial Tax Credit Fund VIII
(the "Fund") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Partnership.



                                          /s/Jenny Netzer
                                          ------------------------------------
                                          Jenny Netzer
                                          Principal Executive Officer and
                                          Principal Financial Officer
                                          Arch Street VIII, LP, as
                                          Managing General Partner of
                                          Boston Financial Tax Credit Fund VIII,
                                          A Limited Partnership


                                          Date:  November 14, 2005


A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
New Brunswick

Canada
PROVINCE OF NEW BRUNSWICK
BUSINESS CORPORATION ACT
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
(SECTION 26, 117)


Name of Corporation/Consoltex Inc.
Corporation Number/510854

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the Articles of the above-mentioned corporation
were amended
(a)under Section  11  of  the  Business  Corporations  Act
   in accordance with the attached notice;
(b)under  Section  26  of  the Business Corporations Act as set out
   in the attached Articles of Amendment designating a series of shares;
(c)under Section 117 of the Business Corporations  Act  as  set out in
   the attached Articles of Amendment; or
(d)under  Section  132  of the Business Corporations Act as set out
   in the attached Articles of Reorganization.

Director
Date of Amendment 12:01 a.m. January 3, 2000
Date de modifications

<PAGE>

NEW BRUNSWICK


NEW BRUNSWICK
BUSINESS CORPORATINS ACT
FORM 3
ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
(SECTION 26,116)

1- NAME OF CORPORATION
CONSOLTEX GROUP INC.
GROUPE CONSOLTEX INC.

2- CORPORATION NO.
510854

3- THE ARTICLES OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED CORPORATION ARE AMENDED AS FOLLOWS:

The name of the corporation be and is hereby changed to "Consoltex Inc."

Date     	DECEMBER 24, 1999
Signature  	SUZANNE CRAWFORD
Description of Office - Description du bureau
VICE-PRESIDENT, LEGAL AFFAIRS AND CORPORATE SECRETARY

FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY:
Filed -
FILED/JAN 03 2000

<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.1




CEO CERTIFICATION




Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.Sec. 1350, as adopted), Patrick J. O’Dea, the Chief Executive Officer of Peet’s Coffee & Tea, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:




1. The Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended January 2, 2011, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Annual Report” ) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and




2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 17th day of March, 2011.





/s/    Patrick J. O’DeaPatrick J. O’DeaChief Executive Officer




This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Peet’s Coffee & Tea, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
# Emergency Medical Services Week, 2022

Every day, emergency medical service (EMS) providers put the needs of their communities above their own as they respond to crises, treat injuries, and save lives. Their heroism has been on full display throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, as resilient EMS workers across the country have provided essential care to Americans. This year's Emergency Medical Services Week theme, “Rising to the Challenge,” pays tribute to the brave frontline professionals who work tirelessly to help their fellow Americans get immediate medical attention in their hours of greatest need.

With compassion, determination, and skill, EMS providers embody the best of our Nation—from paramedics, 911 dispatchers, and emergency medical technicians to nurses, law enforcement officers, and firefighters. Collectively, they distributed COVID-19 vaccinations, provided aid after medical emergencies and disasters, and eased our suffering in countless ways. The unwavering commitment of EMS providers to public service often comes at the cost of their own physical well-being, mental health, and precious time with loved ones.

That is why my American Rescue Plan included billions of dollars to support women and men who serve in EMS roles. I have also made it a priority to ensure that our State, local, Tribal, and territorial partners have the resources they need to train and equip EMS providers so they can respond to public health emergencies safely and effectively.

During Emergency Medical Services Week, we share our appreciation for the selfless EMS professionals who provide lifesaving services every day and risk their lives each time they answer the call of service. We also honor the EMS providers who have made the ultimate sacrifice in the line of duty to protect their fellow Americans. Our Nation owes a tremendous debt of gratitude to these heroes and their loved ones. May God bless our Nation's EMS workers and their families.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR., President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim May 15 through May 21, 2022, as National Emergency Medical Services Week. I call upon public officials, doctors, nurses, paramedics, EMS providers, and all the people of the United States to observe this week with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities to honor our brave EMS workers and to pay tribute to the EMS providers who lost their lives in the line of duty.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirteenth day of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty-two, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and forty-sixth.

[FR Doc. 2022-10879

Billing code 3395-F2-P
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

KARIE PETIT, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-3634

)

JASON PETIT, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed June 15, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 

from the Circuit Court for Collier County; 

Mary Evans, Judge.

James M. Oliver of Cardillo, Keith & 

Bonaquist, P.A., Naples, for Appellant. 

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

NORTHCUTT, KHOUZAM, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
Eric HANNA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7131.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 6, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Richard WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. Tony MAYS, Warden.

No. 19-7571.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Division denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

LORENZO W. POWELL §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-435

STATE OF TEXAS §

 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner Lorenzo W. Powell, a prisoner confined at the Estelle Unit of the Texas

Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this

Petition for Writ of Mandamus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651. Petitioner is seeking a court order

requiring a state court to provide him with records from a criminal proceeding.

The Petition was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636

for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case.

Analysis 

Mandamus is a drastic remedy that should only be granted in extraordinary circumstances. 

Cheney v. United States District Court for the District of Columbia, 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004); Davis

v. Fechtel, 150 F.3d 486, 487 (5th Cir. 1998). To obtain mandamus relief, the petitioner must show

that: (1) the petitioner has a clear and indisputable right to the relief; (2) the respondent clearly has

failed to perform a nondiscretionary duty; and (3) there are no other adequate remedies. Davis, 150

F.3d at 487; Dunn-McCampbell Royalty Interest, Inc. v. National Park Service, 112 F.3d 1283, 1288

(5th Cir. 1997). If these conditions are met, the issuing court, in the exercise of its discretion, must

be satisfied that the writ is appropriate under the circumstances. Cheney, 542 U.S. at 381. 

Case 1:23-cv-00435-MAC-CLS Document 3 Filed 01/03/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 18
Petitioner’s allegations do not meet any of the standards for issuance of a writ of mandamus. 

Further, this court lacks the power to issue a writ of mandamus to direct a state court or judicial

officer to perform their duties. Moye v. DeKalb County Superior Court, 474 F.2d 1275, 1276 (5th

Cir. 1973). Therefore, the request for mandamus relief should be denied. 

Recommendation

This Petition for Writ of Mandamus should be denied.

Objections

Within fourteen days after receipt of the magistrate judge’s report, any party may serve and

file written objections to the findings of facts, conclusions of law and recommendations of the

magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings of facts, conclusions of law and

recommendations contained within this report within fourteen days after service shall bar an

aggrieved party from the entitlement of de novo review by the district court of the proposed findings,

conclusions and recommendations and from appellate review of factual findings and legal

conclusions accepted by the district court except on grounds of plain error. Douglass v. United

Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1417 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R.

CIV. P. 72. 

2

.

___________________________________

Christine L Stetson

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SIGNED this the 3rd day of January, 2024.

Case 1:23-cv-00435-MAC-CLS Document 3 Filed 01/03/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 19