alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information (in thousands except
per share data) extracted from the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 27,
1999 and the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Fiscal Year Ended June
27, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-27-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1999
<CASH>                                          10,487
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,030
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,024
<INVENTORY>                                     49,377
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               191,746
<PP&E>                                         110,765
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,363
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 453,265
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           94,938
<BONDS>                                        104,209
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           113
<OTHER-SE>                                     170,163
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   453,265
<SALES>                                        442,084
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               442,084
<CGS>                                          352,526
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  352,526
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                81,919
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,321
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,754
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,436)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,301)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,135)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,135)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.51)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

SECTION 906CERTIFICATION—CFO

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of J.B. Poindexter & Co., Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Kay, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

To the best of my knowledge,after reasonable investigation:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  March 31, 2010 | By                       | /s/  David Kay |
|----------------------------|--------------------------|----------------|
|                       | David  Kay,              |
|                       | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

 

The foregoing certificationis being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separatedisclosure document.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, orother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           5
<CIK>                                               0000911503
<NAME>                                SMITH BARNEY DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND L.P

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                        JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                        128,731,520
<SECURITIES>                                                   10,344,244
<RECEIVABLES>                                                     375,889
<ALLOWANCES>                                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              139,451,653
<PP&E>                                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                139,451,653
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           3,623,908
<BONDS>                                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                                             0
<COMMON>                                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                                    135,827,745
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  139,451,653
<SALES>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                4,076,252
<CGS>                                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                2,730,230
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 1,346,022
<INCOME-TAX>                                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                         0
<CHANGES>                                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    1,346,022
<EPS-BASIC>                                                       15.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                           0



</TABLE>
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 Eastern District of Texas

RavenWhite Licensing LLC

The Home Depot, Inc., et al

2:23cv423-JRG-RSP

RavenWhite Licensing LLC

06/10/2024 /s/ Andrea L. Fair

Andrea L. Fair; Texas Bar No. 24078488

1507 Bill Owens Parkway

Longview, Texas 75604

andrea@wsfirm.com

(903) 757-6400

(903) 757-2323

Case 2:23-cv-00423-JRG-RSP Document 60 Filed 06/10/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 706
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 11.1

CAMERON ASHLEY BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC. COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    YEARS ENDED

                                    1999                                1998
                    --------------------------------    ----------------------------------
                       INCOME      SHARES     SHARE       INCOME       SHARES      PER-SHARE
                    (NUMERATOR) DENOMINATOR   AMOUNT    (NUMERATOR)  DENOMINATOR    AMOUNT
                    ----------- -----------   ------    -----------  -----------    ------

<S>                 <C>          <C>         <C>        <C>          <C>          <C>
BASIC EPS
Income available
to common
stockholders        $   17,066      8,661     $  1.97   $   15,294    $   9,250    $   1.65
                                              =======                              ========
EFFECT OF DILUTIVE
SECURITIES                            155                                   251
                                  -------                             ---------
DILUTED EPS
Income available
to common
stockholders
assuming dilution   $   17,066      8,816     $  1.94   $   15,294        9,501    $   1.61
                    ==========    =======     =======   ==========    =========    ========
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 106 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 106

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR GOLD MEDAL CEREMONY IN HONOR OF 
              FALLEN HEROES OF 9/11.

    Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center is authorized to be 
used on September 10, 2014, for a 

              

ceremony to award Congressional Gold Medals in honor of the men and 
women who perished as a result of the terrorist attacks on the United 
States on September 11, 2001. Physical preparations for the conduct of 
the ceremony shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as 
may be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 25, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 106

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
 for a ceremony to award Congressional Gold Medals in honor of the men 
  and women who perished as a result of the terrorist attacks on the 
                  United States on September 11, 2001.
```
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 605 

Designating the week beginning November 26, 2012, as ‘‘National Tribal 

Colleges and Universities Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 30, 2012 

Mr. CONRAD (for himself, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. LEVIN, Mrs. 

MURRAY, Mr. BEGICH, Mr. UDALL of New Mexico, Mr. JOHNSON of 

South Dakota, Mr. TESTER, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. AKAKA, and Ms. MURKOWSKI) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the week beginning November 26, 2012, as 

‘‘National Tribal Colleges and Universities Week’’. 

Whereas there are 37 tribal colleges and universities operating on more than 75 campuses in 15 States; 

Whereas tribal colleges and universities are tribally or federally chartered institutions of higher education and therefore have a unique relationship with the Federal Government; 

Whereas tribal colleges and universities serve students from 

more than 250 federally recognized Indian tribes; 

Whereas tribal colleges and universities offer students access 

to knowledge and skills grounded in cultural traditions 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•SRES 605 ATS 

and values, including indigenous languages, which enhance Indian communities and enrich the United States 

as a whole; 

Whereas tribal colleges and universities provide access to high 

quality higher education opportunities for American Indians/Alaska Natives, and other individuals living in some 

of the most rural and economically depressed areas in the 

United States; 

Whereas tribal colleges and universities are accredited institutions of higher education that effectively prepare students 

to succeed in a global and highly competitive workforce; 

Whereas tribal colleges and universities have open enrollment 

policies that have resulted in 17 percent of students at 

tribal colleges and universities being non-Indians; 

Whereas tribal colleges and universities are simply and effectively providing access to quality higher education opportunities to residents of reservation communities and the 

North Slope; 

Whereas the American Indian Higher Education Consortium, 

the national organization established in 1973 by tribal 

colleges and universities, will be celebrating its 40th anniversary as the collective spirit and unifying voice of tribal 

colleges and universities of the United States; and 

Whereas the mission and achievements of tribal colleges and 

universities deserve national recognition: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates the week beginning November 

3 26, 2012, as ‘‘National Tribal Colleges and Univer4 sities Week’’; and 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with 
3 

•SRES 605 ATS 

1 (2) calls on the people of the United States and 

2 interested groups to observe the week with appro3 priate ceremonies, activities, and programs to dem4 onstrate support for tribal colleges and universities. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
Sanjay TYAGI, Petitioner, v. Marc D. SMITH, et al.

No. 19-7373.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

KENNETH TAGGART,

Petitioner

v.

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST 

COMPANY AS TRUSTEE FOR MORGAN 

STANLEY ABS CAPITAL I INC. TRUST 

2007-HE2, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH 

CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-HE2 C/O 

SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, LLC 

AND THE HONORABLE JEFFREY 

TRAUGER IN HIS CAPACITY AS JUDGE,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 7 MM 2021

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of April, 2021, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is 

DENIED. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
Exhibit 21.01
SUBSIDIARIES OF GUILFORD PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
     Below is a list of direct and indirect subsidiaries of the Corporation.All subsidiaries are wholly-owned.
     1.       GPI Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation
     2.       Guilford Pharmaceutical Products Inc., a Maryland corporation
     3.       Artery, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
     4.       GPI NIL Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation
     5.       GPI (Canada) Inc., a Delaware corporation
     6.       Guilford Pharmaceuticals Canada Co., a Nova Scotian unlimitedliability company
     7.       Guilford Pharmaceuticals Ltd., an English corporation
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 7 

To make effective appointment of Deputy Senate Legal Counsel. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 5, 2011 

Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To make effective appointment of Deputy Senate Legal 

Counsel. 

1 Resolved, That the appointment of Patricia Mack 

2 Bryan of Virginia to be Deputy Senate Legal Counsel, 

3 made by the President pro tempore this day, shall become 

4 effective as of January 3, 2011, and the term of service 

5 of the appointee shall expire at the end of the One Hun6 dred Thirteenth Congress. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-20300

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EDENIXON BALMORE SANDOVAL,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-99-CR-664-1

- - - - - - - - - -

April 12, 2001

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Edenixon Balmore Sandoval appeals his conviction and

sentence for illegal reentry by a previously deported alien, in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the felony

conviction that resulted in his increased sentence under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b)(2) is an element of the offense that must have been

charged in the indictment. Sandoval acknowledges that this

argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he
No. 00-20300

-2-

seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review in light of

the decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi, 120

S. Ct. at 2362; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th

Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). Accordingly,

Sandoval’s only argument on appeal is foreclosed. His conviction

and sentence are AFFIRMED.
## IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 12-20004 Summary Calendar

EDWARD PAUL CELESTINE, Plaintiff-Appellant

v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division

No. 4:11-CV-03376

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * 

### Plaintiff-appellant Edward Paul Celestine, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting defendant-appellee’s motion to dismiss Mr. Celestine’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On March 11, 2011, the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration infor m e d M r . Celestine that his Social Security Inc o m e b e nefits would cease effective April 1, 2011. Mr. Celestine sought reconsideration, and the agency affirmed its initial determination. Mr. Celestine then sought a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge, but U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

## F I L E D August 15, 20 12 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 .4. 

### Case: 12-20004 Document: 00511957513 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/15/2012

### No. 12-20004

subsequently withdrew that request. On September 13, 2011, he commenced a civil action in the district court. A claimant may only obtain judicial review of a case arising under the Social Security Act if he has first exh a u s t e d all available administrative remedies. This requires the plaintiff to follow a four-step process that includes

1



### an initial determination, reconsideration, a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge, and review by an Appeals Council. Because Mr. Celestine failed to 2 

### exhaust these administrative remedies when he withdrew his hearing request, the district court correctly concluded that i t d i d n ot have subject-matter jurisdiction over this case. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

See42 U.S. C. § 405(g) ( allow ing anin divid ual to obta in judic ial revie w of “any fi nal

1 dec isi on of the Com mi ss ioner of Soc ial Sec urit y”) (em phas is add ed) ; see also He ckler v. Ringe r , 466 U. S. 602 , 617- 18 ( 1984)

.

See 20 C.F. R. § 416. 1400( a) (exp lainin g that a dec isi on by the Soc ia l Sec urit y 2 Adm inis tra tive only be c o m e s f inal once the fou r- st ep pr oce ss has been com ple ted); see also Wei nber ger v. Sa lf

i , 422 U. S. 749 , 767 (197 5); Cal if ano v. Sa nders , 430 U. S. 99, 108( 1977)

. 

### 2 Case: 12-20004 Document: 00511957513 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/15/2012
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/06/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       31,231
COMMITMENTS
   2,119    5,847    2,139   26,932   23,179   31,190   31,165       41       66

CHANGES FROM 07/30/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -3,673)
  -1,120     -103      -87   -2,499   -3,520   -3,706   -3,710       33       37

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     6.8     18.7      6.8     86.2     74.2     99.9     99.8      0.1      0.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       37)
       7        7        8       17       15       29       27`

---

Updated August 9, 2013
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">SJS Thompson LLC, Petitioner-Landlord<br><br>against<br><br>Rochelle M. Singer, Respondent-Tenant-Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Landlord appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Susan F. Avery, J.), dated November 14, 2017, which granted tenant's preanswer motion to dismiss the petition in a holdover summary proceeding.</p><p>Per Curiam. </p><p>Order (Susan F. Avery, J.), dated November 14, 2017, affirmed, with $10 costs.</p><p>Civil Court properly granted tenant's pre-answer motion to dismiss the holdover petition pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a)(1), since the documentary evidence conclusively established a defense to the holdover petition (<i>see Leon v Martinez</i>, 84 NY2d 83, 88 [1994]). Landlord's offer to renew the stabilized lease in June 2017, timely accepted by tenant, created an enforceable lease agreement, notwithstanding landlord's prior service of a notice of nonrenewal (<a href="../2004/2004_50938.htm" target="_blank"><i>see 123 W. 15, LLC v Compton</i>, 4 Misc 3d 138</a>[A], 2004 NY Slip Op 50938[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2004]; <i>Hakim v Muller</i>, 2002 NY Slip Op 50339[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2002]). "The fact that the landlord may not have intended the proposed lease ... to constitute a binding offer is immaterial because the statute requires that the offer be binding" (<i>Matter of East 56th Plaza, Inc. v New York City Conciliation &amp; Appeals Bd</i>., 56 NY2d 544, 546 [1982]; <i>see Jacreg Realty Corp. v Barnes</i>, 284 AD2d 280, 280-281 [2001]; <i>123 W. 15, LLC v Compton</i>, 2004 NY Slip Op 50938[U], *1).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur <p></p><div align="center"></div><br>Decision Date: June 28, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>