Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 8, 2022 / Notices 34863 

1U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, ‘‘Employer Costs 

for Employee Compensation,’’ December 2021, 

Table 4. Private industry workers by occupational 

and industry group—2021 Q04 Results (bls.gov). 

Electronic Submissions: Submit 

electronic comments to the Federal 

eRulemaking Portal at: https://

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

CPSC typically does not accept 

comments submitted by electronic mail 

(email), except as described below. 

CPSC encourages you to submit 

electronic comments by using the 

Federal eRulemaking Portal, as 

described above. 

Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier/ 

Confidential Written Submissions: 

Submit comments by mail, hand 

delivery, or courier to: Division of the 

Secretariat, Consumer Product Safety 

Commission, 4330 East-West Highway, 

Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone: (301) 

504–7479. If you wish to submit 

confidential business information, trade 

secret information, or other sensitive or 

protected information that you do not 

want to be available to the public, you 

may submit such comments by mail, 

hand delivery, or courier, or you may 

email them to: couscous;cpsc.gov. 

Instructions: All submissions must 

include the agency name and docket 

number. CPSC may post all comments 

without change, including any personal 

identifiers, contact information, or other 

personal information provided, to: 

https://www.regulations.gov. Do not 

submit through this website: 

confidential business information, trade 

secret information, or other sensitive or 

protected information that you do not 

want to be available to the public. If you 

wish to submit such information, please 

submit it according to the instructions 

for mail/hand delivery/courier/ 

confidential written submissions. 

Docket: For access to the docket to 

read background documents or 

comments received, go to: https://

www.regulations.gov, and insert the 

docket number, CPSC–2012–0058, into 

the ‘‘Search’’ box, and follow the 

prompts. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Cynthia Gillham, Consumer Product 

Safety Commission, 4330 East-West 

Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; (301) 

504–7991, or by email to: cgillham@

cpsc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: CPSC 

seeks to renew the following currently 

approved collection of information: 

Title: Safety Standard for WalkBehind Power Lawn Mowers. 

OMB Number: 3041–0091. 

Type of Review: Renewal of 

collection. 

Frequency of Response: On occasion. 

Affected Public: Manufacturers and 

importers of walk-behind power lawn 

mowers. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

Approximately 29 manufacturers and 

importers of walk-behind power lawn 

mowers. 

Estimated Time per Response: Walkbehind power lawn mowers are 

manufactured seasonally to meet 

demand. They are manufactured during 

an estimated 130 days out of the year. 

When they are manufactured, firms are 

required to test and maintain records of 

those tests. Staff estimates three hours 

daily for testing and recordkeeping per 

firm totaling 390 hours per firm (3 hours 

× 130 days). In addition, to produce 

labels and apply labels on the newly 

manufactured lawn mowers, staff 

estimates one hour daily for each firm 

during the production cycle for a total 

of 130 hours per firm (1 hour × 130 

days). 

Total Estimated Annual Burden: Staff 

estimates 11,310 hours on testing and 

recordkeeping (29 firms × 390 hours) 

and 3,770 hours for labeling (29 firms × 

130 hours). Aggregate annual burden 

hours related to testing, recordkeeping, 

and labeling are estimated to be 520 

hours (390 + 130) per firm and 15,080 

hours (11,310 + 3,770) for the industry. 

Annual testing, reporting and 

recordkeeping costs burden is estimated 

to be $796,224 based on 11,310 hours × 

$70.40 (total compensation for 

management, professional, and related 

workers in goods-producing industries) 

and annual cost burden related to 

labeling is estimated to be $132,628.60 

based on 3,770 hours × $35.18 (total 

compensation for all sales and office 

workers in goods-producing 

industries).1 Aggregate annual burden 

costs related to testing, recordkeeping, 

and labeling are estimated to be 

$928,852.60 ($796,224 + $132,628.60) 

for the industry. 

General Description of Collection: In 

1979, the Commission issued the Safety 

Standard for Walk-Behind Power Lawn 

Mowers (16 CFR part 1205) to address 

blade contact injuries. Subpart B of the 

standard sets forth regulations 

prescribing requirements for a 

reasonable testing program to support 

certificates of compliance with the 

standard for walk-behind power lawn 

mowers. 16 CFR part 1205, subpart B. 

In addition, section 14(a) of the CPSA 

(15 U.S.C. 2063(a)) requires 

manufacturers, importers, and private 

labelers of a consumer product subject 

to a consumer product safety standard 

to issue a certificate stating that the 

product complies with all applicable 

consumer product safety standards. 

Section 14(a) of the CPSA also requires 

that the certificate of compliance must 

be based on a test of each product or 

upon a reasonable testing program. The 

information collection is necessary 

because these regulations require 

manufacturers and importers to 

establish and maintain records to 

demonstrate compliance with the 

requirements for testing and labeling to 

support the certification of compliance. 

Request for Comments 

The CPSC solicits written comments 

from all interested persons about the 

proposed collection of information. The 

CPSC specifically solicits information 

relevant to the following topics: 

—Whether the collection of information 

described above is necessary for the 

proper performance of the CPSC’s 

functions, including whether the 

information would have practical 

utility; 

—Whether the estimated burden of the 

proposed collection of information is 

accurate; 

—Whether the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected could be enhanced; and 

—Whether the burden imposed by the 

collection of information could be 

minimized by use of automated, 

electronic or other technological 

collection techniques, or other forms 

of information technology. 

Alberta E. Mills, 

Secretary, Consumer Product Safety 

Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2022–12323 Filed 6–7–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6355–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Department of the Navy 

Notice of Intent To Prepare an 

Environmental Impact Statement for 

Bremerton Waterfront Infrastructure 

Improvements, Bremerton, Kitsap 

County, WA, and To Announce a 

Virtual Public Scoping Meeting 

AGENCY: Department of the Navy (DON), 

Department of Defense (DoD). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National 

Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 

1969, as implemented by the Council on 

Environmental Quality Regulations, the 

Department of the Navy (DON) 

announces its intent to prepare an 

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) 

to evaluate the potential environmental 

impacts associated with construction, 

modification, replacement, demolition, 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
34864 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 8, 2022 / Notices 

and operation of multiple waterfront 

infrastructure and facilities at the Puget 

Sound Naval Shipyard and Intermediate 

Maintenance Facility (PSNS & IMF) at 

Naval Base (NAVBASE) Kitsap 

Bremerton, Washington. The DON is 

initiating a 30-day public scoping 

period to receive comments on the 

scope of the EIS including identification 

of potential alternatives, information, 

and analyses relevant to the Proposed 

Action, identification of environmental 

concerns, issues the public would like 

to see addressed in the EIS, and the 

project’s potential to affect historic 

properties pursuant to Section 106 of 

the National Historic Preservation Act 

(NHPA) of 1966. 

DATES: The public 30-day scoping 

period begins on June 8, 2022, and 

extends to July 11, 2022. Comments 

must be postmarked or submitted 

electronically via email or the website 

no later than 11:59 p.m. Pacific Daylight 

Time (PDT) on July 11, 2022, for 

consideration in the Draft EIS. 

The DON will hold a virtual public 

scoping meeting, consisting of 

presentations and a question-andanswer session. The meeting will be 

held on June 23, 2022, 5:30 p.m. to 6:30 

p.m. PDT. Information about how to 

participate in the meeting, including 

how to submit questions to be discussed 

at the meeting, is available at the DON 

project website address below. The DON 

will also publish participation details 

for the virtual public scoping meeting in 

local newspapers and in press releases. 

ADDRESSES: The DON invites all 

interested parties to submit scoping 

comments on the Bremerton Waterfront 

Infrastructure Improvements EIS to the 

physical and electronic addresses listed 

in the section below. Please visit the 

project website at 

www.BremertonWaterfront

ImprovementsEIS.com for further 

information. 

Comments may be received: 

• electronically via email: info@

BremertonWaterfront

ImprovementsEIS.com; 

• electronically via the project 

website: www.BremertonWaterfront

ImprovementsEIS.com; or 

• by mail, postmarked no later than 

July 11, 2022, to the following address: 

Naval Facilities Engineering Systems 

Command Northwest, Attn: Bremerton 

EIS Project Manager, 1101 Tautog 

Circle, Room 210, Silverdale, WA 

98315. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Naval Facilities Engineering Systems 

Command Northwest, Attn: Ms. 

Christine Stevenson, Bremerton EIS 

Project Manager, 1101 Tautog Circle, 

Room 210, Silverdale, WA 98315, info@

BremertonWaterfront

ImprovementsEIS.com, 360–396–0080. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

purpose of the Proposed Action is to 

address critical deficiencies in dry dock 

capability, capacity, and seismic 

survivability at NAVBASE Kitsap 

Bremerton to enable PSNS & IMF to 

meet its mission to support the DON’s 

nuclear fleet. The Proposed Action is 

needed because PSNS & IMF does not 

have the dry dock capability to support 

the DON’s newest class of nuclearpowered aircraft carrier (CVN), USS 

Gerald R. Ford (CVN 78); PSNS & IMF 

does not have the dry dock and pier 

capacity to conduct the required future 

overhauling, refueling, inactivating, and 

recycling of submarines; and Dry Dock 

(DD) 6, the only dry dock on the West 

Coast that can accommodate a CVN, and 

other existing infrastructure do not meet 

current Department of Defense Unified 

Facilities Criteria design standards for 

seismic performance. 

The Proposed Action will address 

critical deficiencies in dry dock 

capability, capacity, and seismic 

survivability at NAVBASE Kitsap 

Bremerton to enable PSNS & IMF to 

meet its mission to support the DON’s 

nuclear fleet. The DON considers an EIS 

the appropriate document for 

comprehensively analyzing the 

Proposed Action, which will affect 

existing facilities and construct new 

infrastructure and facilities at PSNS & 

IMF. 

The Proposed Action would occur 

along the PSNS & IMF waterfront, 

beginning as early as 2026. Components 

include: construction of a new multimission dry dock (M2D2) at PSNS & 

IMF that can accommodate all classes of 

CVNs along the PSNS & IMF waterfront; 

seismic upgrade of existing DD6; and 

modification, demolition, and/or 

replacement of other piers, wharves, 

quay walls, buildings, cranes, and 

utilities. Although the majority of the 

Proposed Action is expected to occur at 

NAVBASE Kitsap Bremerton, the DON 

could replace some demolished 

facilities at other NAVBASE Kitsap 

installations. 

The DON has identified two 

preliminary action alternatives to carry 

forward for analysis in the EIS along 

with the No Action alternative. These 

alternatives will be further refined based 

on input received from the public and 

resource agencies during scoping. 

Under Alternative 1 (No Action 

Alternative), there would be no change 

from the status quo. The DON would 

not build an M2D2, upgrade DD6 to 

meet current seismic standards, or take 

other component actions. However, the 

DON would continue to rely on, 

maintain, and repair existing facilities to 

perform its mission. 

Under Alternative 2, the DON would 

construct a new M2D2 on the east side 

of PSNS & IMF, at the location of 

existing DD3. Additionally, the DON 

would seismically upgrade DD6 and 

construct a new Forge Shop at 

NAVBASE Kitsap Bangor. The DON 

would also demolish Piers 4, 5, 6, and 

7, including the Hammerhead Crane on 

Pier 6, and construct a new Pier 2. The 

DON would replace Piers 4 and 6 with 

new piers. The DON would dredge 

bottom sediments to create entrance 

channels and provide adequate draft at 

wharves and piers. 

Under Alternative 3, the DON would 

construct an M2D2 in the center of the 

PSNS & IMF waterfront, at the current 

location of Mooring A. Additionally, the 

DON would seismically upgrade DD6. 

The DON would also demolish Mooring 

A, the Hammerhead Crane on Pier 6, 

and Pier 4. The DON would replace Pier 

4 with a new pier. The DON would 

dredge bottom sediments to create 

entrance channels and adequate draft at 

wharves and piers. 

The environmental issues and 

resource areas the DON would examine 

in the EIS include, but are not limited 

to, the following: Air Quality, Water 

Quality, Geological Resources, 

Biological Resources, Cultural 

Resources, American Indian Traditional 

Resources, Land Use and Recreation, 

Visual Resources, Noise, Infrastructure 

and Utilities, Transportation and 

Traffic, Marine Navigation, Public 

Health and Safety, Hazardous Materials 

and Waste, Socioeconomics, and 

Environmental Justice. The EIS will also 

analyze measures that would avoid, 

minimize, or mitigate environmental 

effects. 

Additionally, the DON will conduct 

all coordination, consultation, and 

permitting activities required by the 

Clean Water Act, Rivers and Harbors 

Act, Endangered Species Act, Marine 

Mammal Protection Act, MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and 

Management Act, NHPA, Coastal Zone 

Management Act, and other laws and 

regulations applicable to the project. 

Since project components would be 

phased over multiple years, the DON 

will coordinate with each agency 

regarding timing of consultations and 

permitting. 

The DON encourages federal, state, 

and local agencies, tribes, and interested 

persons to provide comments 

concerning potential alternatives and 

environmental issues for analysis in the 

EIS, as well as to identify specific 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 8, 2022 / Notices 34865 

environmental resources that the DON 

should consider when developing the 

Draft EIS. Additionally, the DON 

encourages interested persons to submit 

comments concerning historic resources 

under Section 106 of the NHPA. The 

DON will prepare the Draft EIS, 

including analysis of potential effects on 

those resources that the DON and the 

public identify. The DON will consider 

all comments received during the public 

scoping period during EIS preparation. 

The project website is available at 

www.BremertonWaterfront

ImprovementsEIS.com. The project 

website provides information on the 

Proposed Action, NEPA process and 

schedule, and includes a document 

library. The public can use this website 

to submit scoping comments 

electronically between June 8, 2022, and 

July 11, 2022. In addition, the public 

can submit substantive questions for 

discussion with DON representatives at 

the virtual public meeting. Questions 

should be submitted by email to info@

BremertonWaterfront

ImprovementsEIS.com or by completing 

the form at www.BremertonWaterfront

ImprovementsEIS.com between June 8, 

2022, and June 22, 2022. 

Additional opportunities for public 

comment will occur after the release of 

the Draft EIS. The DON intends to 

publish the Draft EIS in spring 2023, 

publish the Final EIS in spring 2024, 

and sign a Record of Decision following 

the 30-day Final EIS wait period. 

Dated: May 27, 2022. 

J.M. Pike, 

Commander, Judge Advocate General’s Corps, 

U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2022–11852 Filed 6–7–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

Report From the Study of State 

Policies To Prohibit Aiding and 

Abetting Sexual Misconduct in 

Schools 

AGENCY: Office of Elementary and 

Secondary Education, Department of 

Education. 

ACTION: Notice of availability. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Education 

(Department) is announcing the 

availability of the report entitled ‘‘Study 

of State Policies to Prohibit Aiding and 

Abetting Sexual Misconduct in 

Schools.’’ The report and a summary 

(i.e., a fact sheet summarizing the key 

findings of the study) are on the Office 

of Elementary and Secondary Education 

web page (https://oese.ed.gov/offices/ 

office-of-formula-grants/safesupportive-schools/). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Victoria Hammer, U.S. Department of 

Education, Office of Elementary and 

Secondary Education, 400 Maryland 

Avenue SW, Room 5B242, Washington, 

DC 20202. Telephone: (202) 453–6396. 

Email: Victoria.Hammer@ed.gov. 

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or 

have a speech disability and wish to 

access telecommunications relay 

services, please dial 7–1–1. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Department announces the availability 

of the report entitled ‘‘Study of State 

Policies to Prohibit Aiding and Abetting 

Sexual Misconduct in Schools.’’ Under 

the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 

2022, the Department is required to 

publish the results of the study in the 

Federal Register. The report and a 

summary (i.e., a fact sheet summarizing 

the key findings of the study) are on the 

Office of Elementary and Secondary 

Education web page https://oese.ed.gov/ 

offices/office-of-formula-grants/safesupportive-schools/. 

Accessible Format: On request to the 

contact person listed under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT, individuals with 

disabilities can obtain this document in 

an accessible format. The Department 

will provide the requestor with an 

accessible format that may include Rich 

Text Format (RTF) or text format (txt), 

a thumb drive, an MP3 file, braille, large 

print, audiotape, or compact disc, or 

other accessible format. 

Ruth Ryder, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Programs, Office of Elementary and 

Secondary Education. 

[FR Doc. 2022–12297 Filed 6–7–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Proposed Subsequent Arrangement 

AGENCY: National Nuclear Security 

Administration, Department of Energy. 

ACTION: Proposed subsequent 

arrangement. 

SUMMARY: This document is being 

issued under the authority of the 

Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. 

The Department is providing notice of a 

proposed subsequent arrangement 

under the Agreement for Cooperation 

Concerning Civil Uses of Atomic Energy 

between the Government of the United 

States of America and the Government 

of Canada, as amended. 

DATES: This subsequent arrangement 

will take effect no sooner than June 23, 

2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Andrea Ferkile, Office of 

Nonproliferation and Arms Control, 

National Nuclear Security 

Administration, Department of Energy. 

Telephone: 202–586–8868 or email: 

andrea.ferkile@nnsa.doe.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

subsequent arrangement concerns the 

retransfer of 8,713,018,000 g of U.S.- 

obligated natural uranium hexafluoride 

(UF6), 5,890,000,000 g of which is 

natural uranium, from Cameco 

Corporation in Port Hope, Ontario, 

Canada, to Urenco Ltd. Capenhurst 

Works, Chester, United Kingdom, for 

toll enrichment. Upon transfer to the 

United Kingdom, the material will 

become subject to the Agreement 

between the Government of the United 

States of America and the Government 

of the United Kingdom of Great Britain 

and Northern Ireland for Cooperation in 

Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy. 

Pursuant to the authority in section 

131 a. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, 

as delegated, I have determined that this 

proposed subsequent arrangement 

concerning the retransfer of U.S.- 

obligated nuclear material will not be 

inimical to the common defense and 

security of the United States of America. 

Signing Authority 

This document of the Department of 

Energy was signed on May 31, 2022, by 

Corey Hinderstein, Deputy 

Administrator for Defense Nuclear 

Nonproliferation, pursuant to delegated 

authority from the Secretary of Energy. 

That document with the original 

signature and date is maintained by 

DOE. For administrative purposes only, 

and in compliance with requirements of 

the Office of the Federal Register, the 

undersigned DOE Federal Register 

Liaison Officer has been authorized to 

sign and submit the document in 

electronic format for publication, as an 

official document of the Department of 

Energy. This administrative process in 

no way alters the legal effect of this 

document upon publication in the 

Federal Register. 

Signed in Washington, DC, on June 3, 

2022. 

Treena V. Garrett, 

Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. 

Department of Energy. 

[FR Doc. 2022–12373 Filed 6–7–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES