alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 14

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-15 Filed 09/27/23 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 225
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-15 Filed 09/27/23 Page 2 of 9 PageID #: 2
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-15 Filed 09/27/23 Page 3 of 9 PageID #: 2
Page 3 

1[c] monitoring a volume of data used by the user over the network regardless of which of a plurality of devices the user uses to access the at least one of the plurality of network switches; 

T-Mobile provides a network switch that monitors high-speed data vo

network regardless of which device is used to access the network switSource: https://www.t-mobile.com/support/account/check-your-usage 

Source: https://prepaid.t-mobile.com/prepaid-plans 

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-15 Filed 09/27/23 Page 4 of 9 PageID #: 2
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-15 Filed 09/27/23 Page 5 of 9 PageID #: 2
Page 5 

1[d] controlling the communication of user data on the network by permitting said communication of user data through the plurality of switches while the volume of data used by the user is within the data volume allowance for the user, and; 

T-Mobile permits communication over the network of high-speed data switches while the high-speed data volume is within the data volume a

Source: https://prepaid.t-mobile.com/prepaid-plans Source: https://www.t-mobile.com/support/plans-features/mobile-inte

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-15 Filed 09/27/23 Page 6 of 9 PageID #: 2
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-15 Filed 09/27/23 Page 7 of 9 PageID #: 2
Page 7 

1[e] preventing said communication of user data if the volume of data used by the user reaches or exceeds the data volume allowance for the user. 

T-Mobile prevents the communication of high-speed data (user data) w

data volume exceeds the high-speed data volume allowance for the usSource: https://prepaid.t-mobile.com/prepaid-plans Source: https://www.t-mobile.com/support/plans-features/mobile-inte

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-15 Filed 09/27/23 Page 8 of 9 PageID #: 2
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-15 Filed 09/27/23 Page 9 of 9 PageID #: 2
IN RE Darnell W. MOON, Petitioner.

No. 19-7902.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed July 3, 2024

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D23

- 905

Lower Tribunal No. F22

- 21134



### Russell McCray,

Appellant,

vs.



### The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An appeal conducted pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738

(1967), from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, William Altfield, Judge.

Russ e ll McCray, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and David Llanes, Assistant Attorney

General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Jose MUNOZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9725

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2343

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to provide for the review

and recommendation by the National Academy of Sciences of species

that should be removed from lists of endangered species and threatened

species.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 24, 1999

Mr. CALVERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to provide

for the review and recommendation by the National

Academy of Sciences of species that should be removed

from lists of endangered species and threatened species.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Direct Review of Pro5 tected Species Act of 1999’’.
2

•HR 2343 IH

1 SEC. 2. REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION BY NATIONAL

2 ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF CANDIDATES FOR

3 DELISTING.

4 Section 4(c) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973

5 is amended by adding at the end the following:

6 ‘‘(3) The Secretary shall request the National Acad7 emy of Sciences to review and recommend every five years

8 species included in each list under this subsection that

9 should be removed from that list.’’.

Æ
Freddie Lee WILSON, Petitioner, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 19-7558.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Rebecca Leigh LOVELL, Petitioner, v. CHILDREN'S CORNER DAYCARE.

No. 19-7697.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             985
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,424
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                82,934
<PP&E>                                         703,619
<DEPRECIATION>                                  69,001
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 717,552
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,044
<BONDS>                                        534,439
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         53
<COMMON>                                           158
<OTHER-SE>                                     157,858
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   717,552
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                61,375
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   54,299
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,493
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   475
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,872
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,813
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,813
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,813
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.029)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
Patricia Diane Smith SLEDGE, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9600

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Iouri MIKHEL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7835

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 09/10/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       40,593
COMMITMENTS
   5,292    8,139    1,110   22,808   20,039   29,210   29,288   11,384   11,306

CHANGES FROM 09/03/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      6,762)
     502      146      101    5,913    5,802    6,516    6,049      246      713

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    13.0     20.0      2.7     56.2     49.4     72.0     72.1     28.0     27.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       69)
       8       17        6       40       27       52       47
```

----

Updated September 13, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

843 

CA 13-00299 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, FAHEY, AND PERADOTTO, JJ. 

 

JUDITH CIRIFALCO AND SALVATORE A. 

CIRIFALCO, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, 

V ORDER

U.S.I. BUILDING SERVICES, INC., 

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

DAMON MOREY LLP, BUFFALO (MICHAEL L. AMODEO OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

DAVID P. FELDMAN, BUFFALO, FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County

(Richard C. Kloch, Sr., A.J.), entered May 9, 2012. The order denied

the motion of defendant for summary judgment. 

Now, upon the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the

attorneys for the parties on August 12, 2013, and filed in the Niagara

County Clerk’s Office on August 22, 2013,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed 

without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: September 27, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Shane E. JONES, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6662

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Bernard ROTTSCHAEFER, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-1163.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARCUS JONES,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 620 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of April, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 622 

Notifying the House of Representatives of the election of a President pro 

tempore. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 18 (legislative day, DECEMBER 17), 2012 

Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Notifying the House of Representatives of the election of 

a President pro tempore. 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives be noti2 fied of the election of the Honorable Patrick J. Leahy as 

3 President of the Senate pro tempore. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with
Natalie ANDERSON, Petitioner, v. Adam ROBITAILLE.

No. 19M108

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal denied. Motion for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* with the declaration of indigency under seal denied.
The RAMS FOOTBALL COMPANY, LLC, et al., Petitioners, v. ST. LOUIS REGIONAL CONVENTION AND SPORTS COMPLEX AUTHORITY, et al.

No. 19-672.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Missouri, Eastern District denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the AnnualReport of Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K forthe period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick J. Moore, Chairman andChief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
|  /s/ Patrick J. Moore                  |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|
|  Patrick J. Moore                      |
|  Chairman and  Chief Executive Officer |
|  February 28, 2007                     |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section906, has been provided to Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation and will be retainedby Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-1 Filed 04/29/24 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 263
Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-1 Filed 04/29/24 Page 2 of 17 PageID #: 264
Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-1 Filed 04/29/24 Page 3 of 17 PageID #: 265
Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-1 Filed 04/29/24 Page 4 of 17 PageID #: 266
Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-1 Filed 04/29/24 Page 5 of 17 PageID #: 267
Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-1 Filed 04/29/24 Page 6 of 17 PageID #: 268
Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-1 Filed 04/29/24 Page 7 of 17 PageID #: 269
Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-1 Filed 04/29/24 Page 8 of 17 PageID #: 270
Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-1 Filed 04/29/24 Page 9 of 17 PageID #: 271
Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-1 Filed 04/29/24 Page 10 of 17 PageID #: 272
Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-1 Filed 04/29/24 Page 11 of 17 PageID #: 273
Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-1 Filed 04/29/24 Page 12 of 17 PageID #: 274
Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-1 Filed 04/29/24 Page 13 of 17 PageID #: 275
Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-1 Filed 04/29/24 Page 14 of 17 PageID #: 276
Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-1 Filed 04/29/24 Page 15 of 17 PageID #: 277
Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-1 Filed 04/29/24 Page 16 of 17 PageID #: 278
Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 22-1 Filed 04/29/24 Page 17 of 17 PageID #: 279
EX-10.5



 Exhibit 10.5 
 FIFTH AMENDMENT 
 TO 

THE PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION 
 2010 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 
 The Progressive Corporation 2010 Equity
Incentive Plan, as previously amended (the “Plan”), is hereby amended as follows: 
 1. The second sentence of
Section 2(a) of the Plan is hereby deleted, and the following is substituted in its place: 
 “The Committee shall
consist of not less than two directors of the Company, all of whom shall be Non-Employee Directors and Outside Directors.” 

2. Except as expressly modified hereby, the terms of the Plan shall be unchanged. 

This Amendment will be effective as of April 20, 2012. 

 

	
	 /s/ Charles E. Jarrett

	Charles E. Jarrett
	Secretary
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 05/07/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       38,965
COMMITMENTS
   6,448    4,793    1,313   18,908   22,794   26,669   28,900   12,296   10,065

CHANGES FROM 04/30/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,025)
      -7       46      201       96      198      290      445      735      580

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    16.5     12.3      3.4     48.5     58.5     68.4     74.2     31.6     25.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       48)
       8        7        3       30       24       39       33
```

----

Updated May 10, 2013
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6530

JAMES E. CHAMBERS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GEORGE KENWORTHY, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (1:04-cv-00207) Submitted: August 23, 2007 Decided: August 29, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James E. Chambers, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: James E. Chambers seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Chambers has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
### TE X AS COU RT OF APPE ALS, TH IRD DI STRI CT, AT AUSTI N

N O. 0 3 - 1 3 - 0 0 2 7 3 - C V

In re Rober t G alvin J. A. B., Appellan t
v. Texas Depart m ent of Fam ily and P rote ctive Service s, Appellee

F ROM THE 200 TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, NO. D-1-F M-11- 004474, THE HONORABLE TIM SULAK, JUDG E P RESIDING

O R D E R T O S H O W C A U S E
P ER CURIAM

This is a contempt proce eding ancillar y to the appeal of J .A.B
. The subjec t of t his proce eding is Robert Galvin, appe llant’s attorney

.

Appe llant filed his notice of appea l on April 1, 2013, and his brief was due May 21, 2013. On May 28, 201 3 , we o rd ere d counsel to file appellant’ s brief no later than J une 7, 2013. To da te, appe llant’s brief ha s not been filed.

There fore , it is here by ordered t h at R obert Galvin shall appea r in person befor e this Court on Wed n es d ay , J une 26, 2013, at 9:00 a.m., in the Third Court of Appea ls courtroom, located on the first floor of the Price Daniel, Sr. Buildin g, 2 0 9 W es t 14th Street, in Austin, Travis County , Texas, to show cause why he should n o t b e h el d in contempt and have sanctionsimposed for his failure to obey our May 28, 2013 o rder. This order to show cause will be

withdrawn and Galvin wi l l b e re l i eved of his obliga tion to appea r befor e this Court as order ed above if the Clerk of this Court rec eives a ppellant’s brie f bef

ore June 26, 2013. I t is ordere d on J une 17, 2013.

Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Goodwin and F ield
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. (the ‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Jennifer Magro, Chief Financial Officer and Director of Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                         
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date:    November 14, 2007

/s/ Jennifer Magro
Jennifer Magro
Citigroup Managed Futures LLC
Chief Financial Officer and Director

---
April 24, 2024

Mark Nielsen

Bryan Haynes

Taylor Harris

Scheef & Stone LLP

2600 Network Blvd, Suite 400

Frisco, TX 75034

VIA EMAIL

Re: USA Football, Inc. v. FFWCT, LLC, USA Flag, LLC, and Travis Burnett, Nos. 4:23-cv465 and 4:23-cv-516

Counsel, 

The purpose of this letter is to document a few matters before the close of discovery that remain 

to be addressed. 

• We received documents in response to our subpoena to the NFL that your clients testified 

had been prepared by them but had not been produced by them in this case. For example, 

NFL 63-64, 94-110, and 116-121 are all documents that we were unable to locate in your 

production. Please ask your clients to review their files and produce any and all 

communications and documents prepared in connection with the 2022 proposal. See, e.g.

Request for Production No. 52 to USA Flag. Any supplemental production must be 

provided as soon as possible.

• In his deposition, Mr. Burnett referenced communications between Mr. Davis and Andy 

Fuller of IFAF. (See Burnett Dep. p. 46.) No such communications have been produced. 

Please produce these communications as soon as possible. 

• Mr. Burnett also referenced communications with the USPOC that may not have been 

produced. (See Burnett Dep. pp. 299-300.) Please confirm you have produced all 

communications between your clients and any representative of the USOPC.

• Mr. Burnett testified that USA Flag does have its own financial statements. (See Burnett 

Dep. p. 373-374.) While we believe these were covered by prior requests, they are also 

subject to specific requests that are due on April 26. 

• At this time, your clients still have dozens of documents designated as AEO and 

Confidential, which will burden the parties and the Court by requiring sealing of 

EXHIBIT 1B

Case 4:23-cv-00465-ALM Document 84-3 Filed 07/05/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 3064
 substantial portions of the dispositive motions in these cases. Should you determine to dedesignate any additional documents, please let us know. 

• In light of your agreement on the record at the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition that documents 

obtained from sources other than your clients are not subject to AEO designations, please

issue updated confidentiality designations for Curtis Hollomon’s deposition transcript as 

soon as possible. We have previously inquired about this issue on April 3 and April 20. 

• Likewise, please issue your line and page designations for the Burnett and Davis 

depositions as soon as possible, and no later than May 10, so that the testimony may be 

utilized and sealed as necessary in connection with the May 17 dispositive motions.

We will make ourselves available to meet and confer regarding any of these matters as 

necessary.

Sincerely,

/s/ Anne K. Ricchiuto

Case 4:23-cv-00465-ALM Document 84-3 Filed 07/05/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 3065