alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Attorney or Party without Attorney: For Court use Only

Marc Fenster (SBN 181067)

RUSS AUGUST & KABAT

12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90025

Tielephone No: 310-826-7474

AffomeyFor. Plaintiff I:*bgo, or File No.:-003

Insert name of Court, and Judicial District and Branch Court:.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

P/crJ.ntJ#. Headwater Research LLC

De/endonf.. AT&T lnc., et al.

PROOF OF SERVICE Hearing Date: Time: DepuDiv: Case Number:2:23-cv-00398-jRG-RSP

1. AI the time of service I was at least 18 years of age and not a party to this action.

2. I served copies of the Summons in a Civil Action; Complaint; Civil Case Cover Sheet; Plaintiff's Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement;

Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark; Notice of Related Cases; Notice of

Designation of Lead Counsel

3. cl. Pciro/served.. AT&Tlnc.

b. Person served.. George Martinez, authorized to accept for cT Corporation system, agent for service of process

served under F.R.C.P. Rule 4.

4. Addres5where fheparrtywarsserved.. 1999 Bryan st suite 900, Dallas, TX 75201

5. Iservedthe party:

a. by personal service. I personally delivered the documents listed in item 2 to the party or person authorized to receive

process for the party (1 ) on: Thu, Sep 07 2023 (2) at: 02:45 PM

6. Person who served papers:

a. Tony collins d. 71he Fee/or s€rv/.ce wcr5.. $235.85

b. FIRST LEGAL

1517 W. Beverly Blvd.

LOS ANGELES, CA 90026

c. (213) 250-1111

7. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the united states of America that

09/08/2023

(Date)

PROOF OF

SERVICE

(Signature)

9519682

(5433089)

Case 2:23-cv-00398-JRG-RSP Document 17 Filed 09/14/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 204
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Opinion Research Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, John F. Short, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |         |  |                                     
|---------------------- |  | ------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: November 3, 2004 |  | Signed: |  | /s/ John F. Short                   
|                       |  | Name:   |  | John F. Short                       
|                       |  | Title:  |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
IN RE Alphonza Leonard Phillip Thomas BEY, Petitioner.

No. 19-7351.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Mark CHAPMAN, et al., Petitioners, v. ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 19-689

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21-0075 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiffand Appellee, v. ANTHONY WEIMER,

Defendant and Appellant. 

# FILED NOV 02 2021 Bovven Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court qtRto nf fvlontane ORDER

Appellant Anthony Weimer has filed a petition for rehearing 

## or this Court's October 12, 2021 Opinion reversing Weimer's conviction and remanding the case for a newtrial. State v. Weimer, 2021 MT 266N. Appellee objectsto thepetition. Under M. R. App. P. 20, this Court seldom grants petitions for rehearing. The rule makes clear that this Court will entertain a petition for rehearing on very limited grounds. This Court will consider a petition for rehearing only ifthe opinion "overlooked some fact material to the decision," ifthe opinion missed a question presented by a party that would have decided the case, or ifour decision "conflicts with a statute or controlling decision not addressed"by the Court. M. R.App. P. 20. Having fully consideredAppellant'spetition and the response,the Court concludes Weimer has not established grounds for rehearing under Rule 20 and rehearing is not warranted. IT ISTHEREFORE ORDERED that the petition forrehearing is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis Order to all parties and counsel of record. Dated this day ofNovember, 2021. ChiefJustice 11/02/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0075I Justices
Bejan David ETEMAD, Petitioner v. NORTH DAKOTA.

No. 18-9732

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of North Dakota denied.
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 611 

Designating December 15, 2012, as ‘‘Wreaths Across America Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 6, 2012 

Ms. COLLINS (for herself and Ms. SNOWE) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating December 15, 2012, as ‘‘Wreaths Across 

America Day’’. 

Whereas, 21 years ago, the Wreaths Across America project 

began an annual tradition, during the month of December, of donating, transporting, and placing Maine balsam 

fir holiday wreaths on the graves of the fallen heroes buried at Arlington National Cemetery; 

Whereas, since that tradition began, through the hard work 

and generosity of the individuals involved in the Wreaths 

Across America project, more than 350,000 wreaths have 

been sent to more than 800 locations, including national 

cemeteries and veterans memorials in every State, and to 

locations overseas; 

Whereas the mission of the Wreaths Across America project 

to ‘‘Remember, Honor, Teach’’ is carried out in part by 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•SRES 611 ATS 

coordinating wreath-laying ceremonies at Arlington National Cemetery as well as veterans cemeteries and other 

locations in all 50 States; 

Whereas the Wreaths Across America project carries out a 

week-long veterans parade between Maine and Virginia, 

stopping along the way to spread a message about the 

importance of remembering the fallen heroes of the 

United States, honoring those who serve, and teaching 

the people of the United States about the sacrifices made 

by veterans and their families to preserve our freedoms; 

Whereas, in 2011, wreaths were sent to more than 700 locations across the United States and overseas, 180 more locations than the previous year; 

Whereas, in December 2012, the Patriot Guard Riders, a motorcycle and motor vehicle group that is dedicated to patriotic events and includes more than 250,000 members 

nationwide, will continue their tradition of escorting a 

tractor-trailer filled with donated wreaths from Harrington, Maine, to Arlington National Cemetery; 

Whereas thousands of individuals volunteer each December to 

escort and lay the wreaths; 

Whereas December 10, 2011, was previously designated by 

the Senate as ‘‘Wreaths Across America Day’’; and 

Whereas the Wreaths Across America project will continue its 

proud legacy on December 15, 2012, bringing approximately 125,000 wreaths to Arlington National Cemetery 

on that day: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates December 15, 2012, as ‘‘Wreaths 

3 Across America Day’’; 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with 
3 

•SRES 611 ATS 

1 (2) honors the Wreaths Across America project, 

2 the Patriot Guard Riders, and all of the volunteers 

3 and donors involved in this worthy tradition; and 

4 (3) recognizes the sacrifices our veterans, mem5 bers of the Armed Forces, and their families have 

6 made, and continue to make, for our great Nation. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
Exhibit 10.1

 

March 1, 2012

 

Mr. William J. Abbott

50 Snowball Drive

Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724

 

Re: Employment Agreement Amendment

 

Dear Mr. Abbott:

 

This will confirm our agreement to amend your employment agreement with Crown Media Holdings, Inc. (“Crown”) dated May 7, 2009 (the “Agreement”), as amended on May 11, 2010, as follows:

 

1.                                      Effective March 1, 2012, your base salary as set forth in Paragraph 3(a) of the Agreement shall be Seven Hundred Sixty Seven Thousand Dollars ($767,000) per year.  On March 1, 2013, Employer shall consider an additional salary increase at its discretion based on your performance.

 

2.                                      The performance bonus target set forth in Paragraph 3(b) of the Agreement shall be 70% of your annual base salary.

 

Except as amended herein, all other terms of the Agreement will remain in full force and  effect.

 

 

	
 
    	
 
    	
Very truly   yours,
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Crown Media   Holdings, Inc.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ Donald   J. Hall, Jr.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Donald J.   Hall, Jr.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Title:
    	
Co-Chairman   of the Board
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Agreed and   Accepted:
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ William   J. Abbott
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
William J.   Abbott
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

'

versus ' NO. 1:23-CR-121

'

'

JOE ANTHONY GARCIA '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Stetson conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued her Findings of Fact and Recommendation 

on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. Judge Stetson recommended that 

the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. She further recommended that the court adjudge 

the Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to Judge Stetson’s findings. The court ORDERS that the 

Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge are 

ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea 

agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Joe Anthony Garcia, is 

Case 1:23-cr-00121-MAC-CLS Document 23 Filed 05/21/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 68
2

adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 

84l(a)(l) and (b)(l)(B)(vi) - Possession with the Intent to Distribute a Controlled Substance.

Signed this date

May 21, 2024

Case 1:23-cr-00121-MAC-CLS Document 23 Filed 05/21/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 69
Samuel ELLIOTT, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7622.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Denny REYES, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7718.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 24-0396

_________________

IN RE MARRIAGE OF:

CLINTON ANDERSON,

 Petitioner and Appellee,

 and

ANGELINA ROSE RUFFATO, 

 Respondent and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

The record was filed for purposes of this appeal on August 12, 2024. The opening 

brief is now overdue.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Appellant shall prepare, file, and serve the 

opening brief on appeal no later than October 21, 2024. Failure to file the brief within that 

time will result in dismissal of this appeal with prejudice and without further notice. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all parties. 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 20 2024

09/20/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0396
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION 

WAPP TECH LIMITED 

PARTNERSHIP and 

WAPP TECH CORP., 

 Plaintiffs, 

§

§

§

§

§ 

v. 

§

§

§ 

Civil Action No. 4:23-cv-1137 

JP MORGAN CHASE 

BANK, N.A. 

 Defendant. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

PLAINTIFFS’ RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs Wapp Tech 

Limited Partnership and Wapp Tech Corp. (collectively “Wapp” or “Plaintiffs”) by and through 

their undersigned counsel state that they have no parent corporation and that no publicly held 

corporation owns 10% or more of their stock. 

Case 4:23-cv-01137 Document 5 Filed 12/22/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 53
2 

Dated: December 22, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Leslie V. Payne 

Leslie V. Payne 

State Bar No. 0784736 

lpayne@hpcllp.com 

R. Allan Bullwinkel 

State Bar No. 24064327 

abullwinkel@hpcllp.com 

Alden G. Harris 

State Bar No. 24083138 

aharris@hpcllp.com 

Christopher L. Limbacher 

State Bar No. 24102097 

climbacher@hpcllp.com 

HEIM PAYNE & CHORUSH, LLP 

609 Main Street, Suite 3200 

Houston, Texas 77002 

Telephone: (713) 221-2000 

Facsimile: (713) 221-2021 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS WAPP 

TECH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND WAPP 

TECH CORP. 

Case 4:23-cv-01137 Document 5 Filed 12/22/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 54
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rules CV-5(a) on December 22, 

2023. As such, this document was served on all counsel of record pursuant to Local Rules CV5(a)(3)(A) and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

 

/s/ Leslie V. Payne 

 Leslie V. Payne 

Case 4:23-cv-01137 Document 5 Filed 12/22/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 55
Henry Lee JONES, Petitioner v. TENNESSEE.

No. 19-5062

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Tennessee, Western Division denied.
Jamal COOPER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6951.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4650-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Washington (FEMA-4650-DR), dated March 29, 2022, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued May 17, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Washington is hereby amended to include the following areas among the areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of March 29, 2022.

Chelan, Clallam, and Okanogan Counties for Public Assistance.

Chelan County for snow assistance under the Public Assistance program for any continuous 48-hour period during or proximate to the incident period.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2022-11922 Filed 6-2-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: February 8, 2008
    By       /s/ Cary L. DeaconCary L. DeaconPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Kendall R. CARTER, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-1142.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Opinion filed January 1 6 , 201 4



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

___________



### No. 11

- 1 3

- 00 373

- CR

__________



### ISAAC ELIO FLORES , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 132nd District Court

Scurry County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 9929

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Isaac Elio Flores has filed a pro se notice of appeal from the trial court’s

order denying Flores ’s motion for judgment nunc pro tunc. We dismiss the appeal.

The clerk of this court wrote Flores on December 11 , 201 3 , and informed

him that the order from which he was attempting to appeal did not appear to be an

appealable order . We requested that Flores respond on or before December 30

,2 2013 , and show grounds to continue the appeal

. Flores has filed a brief , but he has

not shown grounds upon which this appeal may continue

.

An intermediate appellate court has no jurisdiction over an appeal from an

order denying a request for judgment n unc pro tunc. Sanchez v. State , 112 S.W.3d

311 (Tex. App.

— Corpus Christi 2003, no pet.) ; Everett v. State , 82 S.W.3d 735

(Tex. App.

— Waco 2002, pet. dism’ d )

. Consequently, we have no jurisdiction to

entertain this appeal.

T h e appeal is dismi ssed for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

January 16, 2014

Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson , J. , and Bailey, J.
Peter J. ROSATO, Petitioner, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 19-5006

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Robert L. BERTRAM, Jr., Bryan S. Wood, Robin G. Peavler, James W. Bottom, and Brian C. Walters, petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-708.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 94 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 94

To express the sense of the Senate in support of reducing its budget by 
                          at least 5 percent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 8, 2011

   Mr. Wicker (for himself, Mr. Coats, Mr. Johanns, Mr. Isakson, Mr. 
Thune, Mr. Portman, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Enzi, Mr. 
Brown of Massachusetts, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. Corker, Mr. Manchin, and Mr. 
Merkley) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                 Committee on Rules and Administration

                             March 16, 2011

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To express the sense of the Senate in support of reducing its budget by 
                          at least 5 percent.

Whereas, the current level Federal spending is unsustainable and action to 
        reverse this course should not be delayed;
Whereas, in 2010, Federal spending was nearly 24 percent of the value of all the 
        goods and services produced in the United States;
Whereas, the Federal deficit was over $1 trillion in fiscal year 2010;
Whereas, Federal spending is at its highest percentage since World War II;
Whereas, the Congressional Budget Office estimates if the United States 
        maintains its current track of Federal spending, the Federal debt would 
        reach 90 percent of the value of all the goods and services produced in 
        the United States by 2020;
Whereas, the national debt exceeds $13.9 trillion dollars;
Whereas, the United States borrows $44,000 for every person in the country;
Whereas, the unemployment rate was 9.8 percent in December;
Whereas, the American people have responded to the economic downturn by making 
        hard choices and trimming their family budgets;
Whereas, spending in the legislative branch rose nearly 50 percent over the last 
        10 years; and
Whereas, in order to address the Nation's fiscal crisis, the Senate should lead 
        by example and reduce its own legislative budget: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that it should lead by 
example and reduce the budget of the Senate by at least 5 percent.
                                 <all>
```
Enoma IGBINOVIA, Petitioner, v. James Greg COX, et al.

No. 19-5187.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.