alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 23.01 Independent Auditors Consent The Board of Directors
Guilford Pharmaceuticals Inc.: We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No. 333-17833, No. 333-72319, No. 333-30814, No. 333-56092, No. 333-71218,
No. 333-88716 and No. 333-105389) on Form S-8 and the registration statements
(No. 333-35415, No. 333-82397, No. 333-87091, No. 333-50222, No. 333-63576,
No. 333-108133, No. 333-110790 and No. 333-111625) on Form S-3 of Guilford
Pharmaceuticals Inc. of our report dated March 12, 2004, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of Guilford Pharmaceuticals Inc. as of December
31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
changes in stockholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2003, and our report dated March 12, 2004
on the related financial statement schedule, which reports appear in the
December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K of Guilford Pharmaceuticals Inc. /s/ KPMG LLP Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 12, 2004
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350


     In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Mendocino
Brewing Company, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the annual period ended
December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yashpal Singh, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Date: August 31, 2005                   /s/ Yashpal Singh
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name:  Yashpal Singh
                                        Title: President, Director and
                                               Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, 

LLC

v.

JACK IN THE BOX, INC.

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NO. 2:24-cv-00052-JRG-RSP

(Lead Case)

ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, 

LLC

v.

ZAXBY’S FRANCHISING LLC

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NO. 2:24-cv-00056-JRG-RSP

(Member Case)

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT ZAXBY’S

OPPOSED MOTION FOR MISCELLANEOUS RELIEF

Having considered Defendant, Zaxby’s Franchising LLC’s Opposed Motion for 

Miscellaneous Relief, this Court GRANTS the motion. Zaxby’s Franchising LLC’s Motion to 

Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Dkt. 12) and Zaxby’s Reply in Support of its Motion to 

Dismiss (Dkt. 28) will be taken into consideration by this Court. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED.

Case 2:24-cv-00052-JRG-RSP Document 31-1 Filed 09/10/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 190
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      10,170,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,253,000<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,006,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,045,000
<PP&E>                                      10,142,000<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,074,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,752,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,315,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,074,000
<SALES>                                     35,906,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            35,906,000
<CGS>                                       26,035,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               30,071,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,001,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               988,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (167,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,978,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   302,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,676,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,676,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .37
<FN>
<F1>The values for the tags of (Receivables) and (PP&E) represent net amounts.
</FN>


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

HERBERT FEIST §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23cv366

SHERIFF, JEFFERSON COUNTY §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner Herbert Feist, proceeding pro se, filed this petition for writ of habeas corpus. This

matter was referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and the

Amended Order for the Adoption of Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to the United States

Magistrate Judge for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition

of the case.

 Procedural Background

On December 20, 2023, the court entered an order directing petitioner to either pay the $5

filing fee or submit a properly certified application to proceed in forma pauperis showing deposits

into his inmate trust account during the preceding six month period. Petitioner was given 20 days

to comply with the court’s order. The time for complying with the order has expired. However,

petitioner has not complied with the court’s order or otherwise contacted the court. 

Discussion

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) authorizes a district court to dismiss an action for

failure to prosecute or for failure to comply with any court order. Larson v. Scott, 157 F.3d 1030,

1031 (5th Cir. 1998). “This authority [under Rule 41(b)] flows from the court's inherent power to

control its docket and prevent undue delays in the disposition of pending cases.” Boudwin v.

Graystone Insurance Co., Ltd., 756 F.2d 399, 401 (5th Cir. 1985) (citing Link v. Wabash, R.R. Co.,

370 U.S. 626, 629 (1962)).

Case 1:23-cv-00366-MJT-ZJH Document 4 Filed 01/17/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 21
By failing to comply with the order described above, petitioner has failed to diligently

prosecute this petition for writ of habeas corpus. As a result, this case should be dismissed for want

of prosecution.

Recommendation

This petition for writ of habeas corpus should be dismissed without prejudice for want of

prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Objections

Objections must be (1) specific, (2) in writing, and (3) served and filed within 14 days after

being served with a copy of this report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED.R.CIV. P. 6(a), 6(b) and 72(b).

A party’s failure to object bars that party from (1) entitlement to de novo review by a district

judge of proposed findings and recommendations, Rodriguez v. Bowen, 857 F.2d 275, 276-77 (5th

Cir. 1988), and (2) appellate review, except on grounds of plain error, of unobjected-to factual

findings and legal conclusions accepted by the district court, Douglass v. United Serv. Auto. Ass’n.,

79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

2

_________________________

Zack Hawthorn

United States Magistrate Judge SIGNED this 17th day of January, 2024.

Case 1:23-cv-00366-MJT-ZJH Document 4 Filed 01/17/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 22
# C_2017220EN.01006101.xml

| 8.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/61

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 220/13)

| Member State | Italy |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Cagliari-Milan Linate and vice versa |
| New period of validity of the contract | A period of four years starting on 9 November 2017 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | 9 July 2017 |
| Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained | Reference document


  OJ C 145 of 9 May 2017

  For further information please contact:





  Autonomous Region of Sardinia |
| Department of Transport |
| Directorate-General for Transport |
| Service for Maritime and Air Transport and Territorial Continuity |
| Via XXIX Novembre 1847, 41 |
| 09123 Cagliari |
| ITALIA |
| Tel. +39 0706067331 |
| Fax +39 0706067309 |
| Website: http://www.regione.sardegna.it |
| Email | : | trasporti@pec.regione.sardegna.it
  trasporti@regione.sardegna.it
  trasp.osp@regione.sardegna.it |

Member State

Italy

Route concerned

Cagliari-Milan Linate and vice versa

New period of validity of the contract

A period of four years starting on 9 November 2017

Deadline for submission of tenders

9 July 2017

Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained

Reference document

Reference document

OJ C 145 of 9 May 2017

For further information please contact:

Autonomous Region of Sardinia

Department of Transport

Directorate-General for Transport

Service for Maritime and Air Transport and Territorial Continuity

Via XXIX Novembre 1847, 41

09123 Cagliari

ITALIA

Tel. +39 0706067331

Fax +39 0706067309

Website: http://www.regione.sardegna.it

Email

:

trasporti@pec.regione.sardegna.it

trasporti@regione.sardegna.it

trasp.osp@regione.sardegna.it

---
Brandy V. HARRIS, Petitioner, v. Britney MAY, et al.

No. 19-7882.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 42 

Recognizing and congratulating the Detroit brand on the occasion of its 

75th anniversary in Michigan. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 28, 2013 

Mr. CONYERS (for himself, Mr. DINGELL, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. HUIZENGA of 

Michigan, Mr. WALBERG, Mr. BENTIVOLIO, Mr. PETERS of Michigan, 

Mr. CAMP, and Mr. KILDEE) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government 

Reform 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Recognizing and congratulating the Detroit brand on the 

occasion of its 75th anniversary in Michigan. 

Whereas 2013 marks the 75th anniversary of the Detroit 

brand; 

Whereas the Detroit brand is rooted in Detroit’s rich automotive heritage, beginning in the Great Depression and 

continuing today as a leader in producing heavy-truck engines; 

Whereas the origin of the Detroit brand began as the Detroit 

Diesel Corporation in 1938; 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 42 IH 

Whereas in the 1930s and 1940s, Detroit was producing engines used by the Allied Forces in tanks, landing craft, 

and generators among other equipment; 

Whereas in the 1950s Detroit expanded its product line and 

began to focus on the heavy-duty truck market; 

Whereas in the 1960s and 1970s, Detroit’s business growth 

tripled as it formed new alliances, becoming Detroit Diesel Allison; 

Whereas in the late 1980s, Detroit launched its signature 

four-cycle heavy-duty engine, the Series 60, which became a leader in the North American engine market; 

Whereas in 1988, Detroit Diesel Allison became the Detroit 

Diesel Corporation and saw its United States market 

share rapidly expand; 

Whereas in 2000, the Detroit Diesel Corporation joined the 

Daimler group; 

Whereas in 2005, Detroit Diesel launched the Renaissance 

project, creating jobs and investing hundreds of millions 

of dollars in expanded engine production in Michigan; 

Whereas in 2009, the 1 millionth Series 60 engine was sold; 

Whereas in 2010, Detroit Diesel continued to invest in Michigan and launched new cleaner diesel technology; and 

Whereas in 2012, the Detroit brand of engines, axles, and 

transmissions was launched with new capital investment 

and additional new jobs in Detroit, Michigan: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress recognizes and congratulates 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HCON 42 IH 

1 the Detroit brand on the occasion of its 75th anniversary 

2 in Michigan. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  filing  of the  Current  Report  on Form 8-K (the
Report) by Prime  Retail,  Inc. (the  Company),  the  undersigned,  as the Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


    Date: November 14, 2002                 /s/  Glenn D. Reschke
                                            ---------------------
                                            Glenn D. Reschke
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
[LETTERHEAD OF CONTIMORTGAGE CORPORATION]

March 12, 1999

Arthur Andersen, LLP
1345 Avenue of the America
New York, NY 10105

Dear Sirs:

As of and for the year ended December 31, 1998, ContiMortgage Corporation has
complied with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers
Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers. As of December 31,1998 ContiMortgage Corporation had in effect fidelity
bond and errors and omissions policy in the amounts of $14,000,000 and
$6,000,000, respectively.


/s/ Margaret M. Curry                         /s/ William P. Higgins           
------------------------------                -------------------------------  
Margaret M.Curry                              William P. Higgins
Sr. Vice President - Servicing                Vice President and Controller


March 12, 1999                                March 12, 1999


                                      -9-
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MediaNews Group, Inc. (the
"Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald A. Mayo, Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                                     /s/ RONALD A. MAYO
                                                         ------------------
                                                         Ronald A. Mayo
                                                         Vice President and
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                                         September 27, 2004
FORT BEND MECHANICAL, LIMITED, et al., Petitioners, v. GIL RAMIREZ GROUP, L.L.C., et al.

No. 19-149

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
John A. TOTH, Petitioner, v. Peter ANTONACCI, et al.

No. 19-7709.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0542 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ERIC JOE JAYNES,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including July 29, 202 4 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 20 2024

06/20/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0542
Davion FITZGERALD, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7646.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Eteri KHOLOST, et al., Petitioners, v. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, et al.

No. 18-9271

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Donniel WOODS, Petitioner, v. Aaron JOYNER, Warden.

No. 19-7666.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 6, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUFKIN DIVISION

DRALON PATTERSON § 

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:24-CV-18

DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID §

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Petitioner Dralon Patterson, an inmate confined at the Wainwright Unit of the Texas

Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this

petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

The petition was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636

for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case.

Discussion 

Title 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a) allows a district court to “entertain an application for a writ of

habeas corpus in behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court only on the

ground that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). A state prisoner is required to file his federal petition for writ of habeas corpus

in either the district where the prisoner is incarcerated or the district where the prisoner was

convicted and sentenced. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). Although both district courts have jurisdiction to

entertain the application, “[t]he district court for the district wherein such an application is filed in

the exercise of its discretion and in furtherance of justice may transfer the application to the other

district court for hearing and determination.” Id.

Case 9:24-cv-00018-MAC-ZJH Document 2 Filed 01/25/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 20
Petitioner filed this petition in the Lufkin Division of the Eastern District of Texas. This

court has jurisdiction because Petitioner is incarcerated in this district. However, Petitioner was

convicted and sentenced in Dallas County, which is located in the Northern District of Texas. The

court has considered the circumstances and has determined that the interests of justice would be

served by transferring this petition to the district where Petitioner was convicted and sentenced. 

Therefore, the petition should be transferred to the Dallas Division of the Northern District of Texas

for hearing and determination. It is accordingly

ORDERED that this petition for writ of habeas corpus is TRANSFERRED to the Dallas

Division of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. 

2

_________________________

Zack Hawthorn

United States Magistrate Judge SIGNED this 25th day of January, 2024.

Case 9:24-cv-00018-MAC-ZJH Document 2 Filed 01/25/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 21
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to
U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Carl Spana, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Palatin Technologies, Inc., hereby certify, to my knowledge, that the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 of Palatin
Technologies, Inc. (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Palatin Technologies, Inc.

Dated:  May 9, 2007

/s/ Carl SpanaCarl Spana, President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

SIGNODE INDUSTRIAL GROUP LLC,

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

SAMUEL, SON & CO., LTD. and SAMUEL, SON 

& CO. (USA) INC. d/b/a SAMUEL PACKAGING 

SYSTEMS GROUP and SAMUEL STRAPPING 

SYSTEMS, 

 

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 2:24-cv-00080-JRG

DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF DESIGNATION OF LEAD ATTORNEY

Pursuant to Local Rule CV-11(a), Defendants’ file this Designation of Lead Attorney and 

hereby notify the Court that Michael R. Houston of the law firm Foley & Lardner LLP, 321 North 

Clark Street, Suite 3000, Chicago, IL 60654, should be designated as lead attorney for Defendants 

in the above-referenced matter. All pleadings, discovery, correspondence and other material 

should be served upon counsel at the address referenced above. 

Case 2:24-cv-00080-JRG Document 23 Filed 06/10/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 254
2 

Dated: June 10, 2024 /s/ Melissa R. Smith

Michael R. Houston (IL Bar No. 6286431)

Pavan K. Agarwal (D.C. Bar No. 459614) 

Tiffany K. Sung (CA Bar No. 323077) 

Gabriella M. Salek (IL Bar No. 6342686) 

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP

321 North Clark Street, Suite 3000 

Chicago, IL 60654 

Telephone: (312) 832-4378 

Facsimile: (312) 832-4700 

Email: mhouston@foley.com 

 pagarwal@foley.com

 tsung@foley.com 

 gsalek@foley.com 

Melissa R. Smith

State Bar No. 24001351 

GILLAM & SMITH, LLP

303 South Washington Avenue 

Marshall, Texas 75670 

Tel: (903) 934-8450 

Fax: (903) 934-9257 

melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com

Case 2:24-cv-00080-JRG Document 23 Filed 06/10/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 255
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that counsel of record who are deemed to have consented 

to electronic service are being served today, June 10, 2024, with a copy of this document via the 

Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3).

 /s/ Melissa R. Smith 

Case 2:24-cv-00080-JRG Document 23 Filed 06/10/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 256