alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2274 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2274

To provide for the transfer of 10 percent of a State's apportionment of 
 certain highway funds to the State's highway safety apportionment if 
 the State does not suspend the driver's license of individuals under 
    the age of 21 convicted of driving while under the influence of 
                                alcohol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 17, 1999

Mr. Traficant introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the transfer of 10 percent of a State's apportionment of 
 certain highway funds to the State's highway safety apportionment if 
 the State does not suspend the driver's license of individuals under 
    the age of 21 convicted of driving while under the influence of 
                                alcohol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF APPORTIONMENT.

    On October 1, 2002, and each October 1 thereafter, if a State has 
not enacted or is not enforcing a law that requires in all 
circumstances the revocation or suspension of the driver's license of 
any individual who is less than 21 years of age and who is convicted, 
after the date of enactment of this Act, of driving while under the 
influence of alcohol, the Secretary shall transfer an amount equal to 
10 percent of the amount apportioned to any State on that date under 
each of paragraphs (1), (3), and (4) of section 104(b) of title 23, 
United States Code, to the apportionment of the State under section 402 
of such title to be used for alcohol-impaired driving countermeasures, 
especially for individuals who are less than 21 years of age. Such 
suspension or revocation shall be until the individual's 21st birthday.

SEC. 2. DRIVING TO AND FROM WORK.

    The apportionment of a State shall not be transferred under section 
1 if the State allows an individual convicted while driving under the 
influence of alcohol to drive, during the period of revocation or 
suspension of the individual's driver's license in accordance with 
section 1, only for the purposes of going to and from such individual's 
place of employment or to and from a college or other institution of 
higher education or a trade school.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2017048EN.01000501.xml

| 15.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/5

---

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1))

1

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 48/06)

Decisions granting an authorisation

Decisions granting an authorisation

| Reference of the decision (2) | Date of decision | Substance name | Holder of the authorisation | Authorisation number | Authorised use | Date of expiry of review period | Reasons for the decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C(2017) 658 | 8 February 2017 | Trichloroethylene
  EC No 201-167-4
  CAS No 79-01-6 | Richard Geiss GmbH, Lueßhof 100, 89362 Offingen, Bayern, Germany | REACH/2017/1/0 | Use of trichloroethylene in formulation | 21 April 2028 | In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socioeconomic benefits outweigh the risk to human health arising from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies in terms of their technical and economic feasibility. |
| REACH/2017/1/1 | Use of trichloroethylene in packaging |

Reference of the decision (2)

2

Date of decision

Substance name

Holder of the authorisation

Authorisation number

Authorised use

Date of expiry of review period

Reasons for the decision

C(2017) 658

8 February 2017

Trichloroethylene

EC No 201-167-4

CAS No 79-01-6

Richard Geiss GmbH, Lueßhof 100, 89362 Offingen, Bayern, Germany

REACH/2017/1/0

Use of trichloroethylene in formulation

21 April 2028

In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socioeconomic benefits outweigh the risk to human health arising from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies in terms of their technical and economic feasibility.

REACH/2017/1/1

Use of trichloroethylene in packaging

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

1

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/chemicals/reach/about/index_en.htm

2

---
Joey D. WISEMAN, Jr., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7341

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Kinney Lee PALMER, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7337

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
III 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 100 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 10, 2014 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a 

ceremony to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the 

enactment of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HCON 100 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. USE OF THE ROTUNDA OF THE CAPITOL FOR 

2 CEREMONY TO COMMEMORATE THE 50TH AN3 NIVERSARY OF THE ENACTMENT OF THE 

4 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964. 

5 The Rotunda of the United States Capitol is author6 ized to be used on June 24, 2014, for a ceremony to com7 memorate the 50th anniversary of the enactment of the 

8 Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the significant impact the 

9 Act had on the Civil Rights movement. Physical prepara10 tions for the conduct of the ceremony shall be carried out 

11 in accordance with such conditions as may be prescribed 

12 by the Architect of the Capitol. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 9, 2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S AUDITED DECEMBER 31, 1996 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         621,742
<SECURITIES>                                    50,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,611,965
<ALLOWANCES>                                   255,494
<INVENTORY>                                    125,850
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,210,057
<PP&E>                                       2,366,716
<DEPRECIATION>                                 736,556
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,085,269
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,512,905
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,022,671
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,085,269
<SALES>                                      6,219,946
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,219,946
<CGS>                                        3,604,729
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,143,595
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,253
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (923,649)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (164,591)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,208,107)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,208,107)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.41)
        



</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.51
 Summary of 2008 Executive Retention Program
 Design Principles:
 
    
    To retain executives during the anticipated 2008 restructuring.
    
    Provide clear criteria and guidelines to ensure consistent administration
 Eligibility Criteria:
 
    
    Executives in the executive compensation program who are not covered by an employment
agreement that provides for cash and equity awards.
    
    Executives whose continued service in 2008 is categorized as essential, necessary or
valued.
 Program Components:
 
    
    Restricted Stock Awards will be awarded to executives identified as essential or necessary
with a three year cliff vest. Amounts are determined on an individual basis.
    
    Guaranteed cash awards will be available to participants with a two-part payment
opportunity at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2008. Amounts are determined on an individual
basis.
 Effects of Termination:
 
    
    If the individual is separated* for reasons other than cause on or before December 31,
2008, he/she will receive both (or any unpaid) portions of the guaranteed cash bonus in the
first pay period following separation.
    
    If an executive voluntarily resigns in 2008, he/she forfeits any unpaid portion of the
guaranteed cash bonus.
    
    If an executive is terminated for cause, he/she forfeits any unpaid portion of the
guaranteed cash bonus.
    
    Unvested equity will be governed by the terms of the 2006 Long Term Stock Incentive Plan
and agreements issued thereunder.
Donald R. SANDERS, Petitioner, v. Barack Hussein OBAMA, et al.

No. 19-6281.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>  5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-2000
<CASH>                                           1,042
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  121,523
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    128,462
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               257,923
<PP&E>                                          49,734
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 317,769
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           60,434
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           145
<OTHER-SE>                                     209,311
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   317,769
<SALES>                                         80,403
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                           43,516
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   72,885
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,324
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 530
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,664
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,701
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,963
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,963
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21


</TABLE>
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/24/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       54,731
COMMITMENTS
   1,312    6,005    4,346   48,769   44,125   54,427   54,476      304      255

CHANGES FROM 12/17/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,962)
     -71      946       79    2,982    1,916    2,990    2,941      -28       21

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     2.4     11.0      7.9     89.1     80.6     99.4     99.5      0.6      0.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       42)
       6        9        9       16       22       26       37`

---

Updated December 30, 2013
Francisco PENA, Jr., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7336

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Michael David GOODWIN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-952

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

Analytical Technologies LLC,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Restaurant Brands International, Inc., 

Defendant. 

§

§ 

§

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NO. 2:23-CV-00288-JRG-RSP

ORDER

Before the Court is the Stipulated Joint Motion for Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Analytical 

Technologies, LLC and Defendant Restaurant Brands International Inc. (Dkt. No. 46.) In the 

Motion, the parties represent that the above-captioned case has been resolved and 

request dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims in the above-captioned action with 

prejudice and Defendant’s counterclaims without prejudice. (Id. at 1.) 

Having considered the Motion, the Court finds that it should be and hereby is GRANTED. 

Accordingly, the claims and causes of action asserted by Plaintiff in the above-captioned case are 

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and the counterclaims asserted by Defendant in the abovecaptioned case are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Each party is to bear its own costs, 

expenses, and attorneys’ fees. All pending requests for relief in the above-captioned case not 

explicitly granted herein are DENIED AS MOOT. 

The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the above-captioned case.

Case 2:23-cv-00288-JRG-RSP Document 47 Filed 04/26/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 379
2

____________________________________

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 26th day of April, 2024.

Case 2:23-cv-00288-JRG-RSP Document 47 Filed 04/26/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 380
OLYMPIC STEWARDSHIP FOUNDATION, et al., petitioners, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICE, et al.

No. 17-1517.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2 denied.
Darrell REYNOLDS, Petitioner, v. CIRCUIT COURT OF KENTUCKY, Laurel County.

No. 18-9269

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Petitioner, v. MONTANA EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, et al.

No. 19-368.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument denied. Motion of Minnesota, et al. for leave to participate in oral argument as *amici curiae* and for divided argument denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/27/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       36,941
COMMITMENTS
   5,347    8,296    1,397   19,202   16,192   25,947   25,885   10,995   11,056

CHANGES FROM 08/20/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -2,437)
   1,471      594      165   -3,228   -2,244   -1,592   -1,485     -845     -952

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    14.5     22.5      3.8     52.0     43.8     70.2     70.1     29.8     29.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       58)
       5       14        6       37       30       45       48
```

----

Updated August 30, 2013
Nadejda ROZANOVA, et vir, Petitioners v. Rafael S. URIBE

No. 18-1462

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District denied.
Jose Antonio CONTRERAS, Petitioner, v. WASHINGTON.

No. 18-9473

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 07, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Larry David DAVIS, Petitioner, v. Larry TEGLEY, et al.

No. 19-7391.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/23/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      543,696
COMMITMENTS
  97,288   37,057  134,854  293,191  353,217  525,333  525,128   18,363   18,568

CHANGES FROM 04/16/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -17,573)
   5,042   -2,940   -7,949  -13,198   -7,057  -16,105  -17,946   -1,468      373

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    17.9      6.8     24.8     53.9     65.0     96.6     96.6      3.4      3.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      159)
      44       45       66       61       62      138      143
```

----

Updated April 26, 2013
Henry James LAGI, Petitioner v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-9619

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies, to
the best of his knowledge, that this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ACT Teleconferencing, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003.



Date: April 14, 2004



By:

/s/    Gene WarrenGene Warren Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 107 (Friday, June 3, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 33807]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11917]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4629-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2021-0001]


Connecticut; Amendment No. 4 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Connecticut (FEMA-4629-DR), dated October 30, 2021, 
and related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued May 10, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Connecticut is hereby amended to include the following 
area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of October 30, 2021.

    Middlesex County for Public Assistance.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2022-11917 Filed 6-2-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
PAUL G., a Conserved Adult, By and Through His Conservator Steve G., petitioner, v. MONTEREY PENINSULA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.

No. 19-1043.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.