alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #17383 and #17384; WASHINGTON Disaster Number WA-00104]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 3.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Washington (FEMA-4650-DR), dated 03/29/2022.

*Incident:*                         Severe Winter Storms, Snowstorms, Straight-line Winds, Flooding, Landslides, and Mudslides.                    

*Incident Period:*                         12/26/2021 through 01/15/2022.                    

# DATES:

Issued on 05/17/2022.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         05/30/2022.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         12/29/2022.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

      ( print page 34745)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of Washington, dated 03/29/2022, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

*Primary Counties:*                     Chelan, Clallam, Okanogan.                

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Joshua Barnes,

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2022-12150 Filed 6-6-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
Jeremy T. WALKER, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7855.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
In Re Donald L. SPENCER, petitioner.

No. 18-6745.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Jackie Lee BOYD, Petitioner, v. Carol MONROE, et al.

No. 19-6329.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for rehearing denied.
<PAGE>
         BOSTON FINANCIAL TAX CREDIT FUND VIII, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP


                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Financial Tax Credit Fund VIII
(the "Fund") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Partnership.




                                        /s/Gary Mentesana
                                        --------------------------------------
                                        Gary Mentesana
                                        Principal Executive Officer and
                                        Principal Financial Officer
                                        Arch Street VIII, LP, as
                                        Managing General Partner of
                                        Boston Financial Tax Credit Fund VIII,
                                        A Limited Partnership


                                        Date:  November 14, 2006



A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.01

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report dated January 17, 1997 included in this Form 10-K into
Crescent Real Estate Equities Company's previously filed Registration 
Statements File No. 33-91438, No. 33-92548, No. 333-3450, No. 333-3452, 
No. 333-3454, No. 333-13521, No. 33-21905 and No. 333-23005.


                                                ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Dallas, Texas
March 20, 1997
Juan RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 18-9759

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

CHAD WOOD

, §

§ No. 294 , 201 5

Petitioner Below

, §

Appellant, § Court Below

— Family C ourt

§ of the State of Delaware in and

v. § for New Castle County

§

KAREN HALL

, § File No. CN11

- 06437

§ Pet. No. 14

- 25901

Respondent Below

, §

Appellee. §

Submitted: September 9 , 2015

Decided: September 11 , 2015

O R D E R

T his 11th day of September 2015

, it appears to the Court that , on August 11,

2015, the C lerk issued a notice to show cause, by certified mail, directing the

appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for h is failure to

file an opening brief and appendix. The Clerk sent an additional copy of the notice

to the appellant on Augu st 26, 2015. T he appellant has not responded to the notice

to show cause within the required ten

- day period . D ismissal of the appeal is

deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules

3(b)(2) and 29(b), that th is appeal i s DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr.

Chief Justice
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 12/24/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       90,371
COMMITMENTS
  25,050    6,608    3,453   55,564   77,743   84,067   87,804    6,304    2,567

CHANGES FROM 12/17/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -27,372)
    -116    2,506   -2,671  -23,390  -26,105  -26,177  -26,270   -1,195   -1,102

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    27.7      7.3      3.8     61.5     86.0     93.0     97.2      7.0      2.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       84)
      12        6        1       46       35       58       42
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 12/24/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      227,771
COMMITMENTS
  73,007   33,056    1,311  139,945  187,363  214,263  221,730   13,508    6,041

CHANGES FROM 12/17/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -59,711)
  -2,929    8,125   -8,787  -41,380  -53,206  -53,096  -53,868   -6,615   -5,843

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    32.1     14.5      0.6     61.4     82.3     94.1     97.3      5.9      2.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      180)
      57       23       15       69       62      132       94
```

----

Updated December 30, 2013
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

MACY’S, INC.,

Defendant.

 Case No. 2:23-cv-00583-JRG

 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

On April 15, 2024, Defendant Macy’s, Inc. filed a Motion to Dismiss For Failure to State a 

Claim under F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) (Dkt. No. 15) (“MTD”). Plaintiff Symbology Innovations, LLC has 

filed a First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 22).

It is well established that a later-filed amended complaint moots a motion asking the Court 

to dismiss an earlier-filed complaint. See Griffin v. Am. Zurich Ins. Co., 697 F. App’x 793, 797 (5th 

Cir. 2017) (“Once filed, that amended complaint rendered all earlier motions ... moot.”); see also 

Bishop Display Tech LLC v. Samsung Elecs. Co., Ltd., No. 2:21-cv-00139-JRG, Dkt. No. 40 (E.D. 

Tex. Oct. 4, 2021) (“Once Plaintiff filed its amended complaint, the Motion became moot.”); 

Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. Eaton Corp. PLC, No. 2:19-CV-00290-JRG, 2019 WL

Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 23 Filed 04/29/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 347
11250161, at *1 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 7, 2019) (“Accordingly, the filing of an amended complaint

moots a motion to dismiss the original complaint.”).

Accordingly, Defendant’s MTD is now moot.

Dated: April 29, 2024 Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Randall Garteiser

Randall Garteiser

 Texas Bar No. 24038912

 rgarteiser@ghiplaw.com

Christopher A. Honea

 Texas Bar No. 24059967

 chonea@ghiplaw.com

M. Scott Fuller

 Texas Bar No. 24036607

 rgarteiser@ghiplaw.com

GARTEISER HONEA, PLLC

119 W. Ferguson Street

Tyler, Texas 75702

Telephone: (903) 705-7420

Facsimile: (903) 405-3999

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF

Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 23 Filed 04/29/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 348
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing using the Court’s Case Management 

and Electronic Case Filing system, which will send notification of such filing to counsel of record 

in this action registered with the Court’s system. Those counsel not registered with the Court’s 

system will receive service via electronic and U.S. Mail.

/s/ Randall Garteiser

Randall Garteiser

Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 23 Filed 04/29/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 349
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, the undersigned certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this periodic
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ACT Teleconferencing, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Date: April 2, 2007



By:

/s/ Peter E. SalasPeter E. Salas Executive Chairman
In the MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF Philip R. FARTHING.

No. D-3065

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Philip R. Farthing, of Norfolk, Virginia, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
EXHIBIT 10.1
      


     

      

    Field Point Capital Management Company

    One Landmark Square, Suite 1900

    Stamford, CT 06901

    

    

    

    

    March 18, 2019

    PASSUR Aerospace, Inc.

    One Landmark Square, Suite 1900

    Stamford, CT 06901

    

    

    As Chairman of the Board as well as the principal shareholder of PASSUR Aerospace, Inc. (“PASSUR
        Aerospace” or the “Company”), I make the following commitment to the Company with respect to the period from the date of this commitment through March 18, 2020.

    

    

    Liquidity

    

    

    I commit that if the Company at any time is unable to meet its obligations through March 18, 2020, that I
        will provide the necessary continuing financial support to the Company to ensure the Company’s ability to operate as a going concern through the period ending March 18, 2020. Such continuing support may take the form of additional loans or advances
        to PASSUR Aerospace in addition to the deferral of principal and/or interest payments due on outstanding loans to PASSUR Aerospace as referred to above.

    

    

    These commitments are not conditional and are irrevocable through the period ending March 18, 2020.

    

    

    I, G.S. Beckwith Gilbert, having the financial wherewithal to enter into this irrevocable commitment, make
        the above commitments to the Company and its shareholders.

     

      

    

    

    /s/ G.S. Beckwith Gilbert
    G.S. Beckwith Gilbert

    President
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 82 

To provide sufficient time for legislation to be read. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 1, 2011 

Mr. PAUL submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules and Administration 

RESOLUTION 

To provide sufficient time for legislation to be read. 

1 Resolved, That (a) it shall not be in order for the Sen2 ate to consider any bill, resolution, message, conference 

3 report, amendment, treaty, or any other measure or mat4 ter until 1 session day has passed since introduction for 

5 every 20 pages included in the measure or matter in the 

6 usual form plus 1 session day for any number of remain7 ing pages less than 20 in the usual form. 

8 (b)(1) Any Senator may raise a point of order that 

9 any bill, resolution, message, conference report, amend10 ment, treaty, or any other measure or matter is not in 

11 order under subsection (a). No motion to table the point 

12 of order shall be in order. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 82 IS 

1 (2) Any Senator may move to waive a point of order 

2 raised under paragraph (1) by an affirmative yea and nay 

3 vote of two-thirds of the Senators duly chosen and sworn. 

4 All motions to waive under this subparagraph shall be de5 batable collectively for not to exceed 3 hours equally di6 vided between the Senator raising the point for order and 

7 the Senator moving to waive the point of order or their 

8 designees. A motion to waive the point of order shall not 

9 be amendable. 

10 (3) This resolution is enacted pursuant to the power 

11 granted to each House of Congress to determine the Rules 

12 of its Proceedings in clause 2 of section 5 of Article I of 

13 the Constitution of the United States. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
In the MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF Keith Allan VANDERBURG

No. D-3064

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Keith Allan Vanderburg, of Independence, Ohio, is suspended from the practice *1258of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      45,204,000
<SECURITIES>                                36,496,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               66,833,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (5,328,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,204,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           217,068,000
<PP&E>                                     904,963,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (96,943,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,170,288,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      122,583,000
<BONDS>                                  1,053,608,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       65,603,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   241,198,000
<OTHER-SE>                               (450,438,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,170,288,000
<SALES>                                    224,925,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           224,925,000
<CGS>                                      124,999,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              278,952,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          (34,926,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          84,058,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (103,159,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (103,159,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                             (103,159,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.88)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 108 (Monday, June 6, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 34262]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12052]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 14861-002]


FFP Project 101, LLC; Notice of Reasonable Period of Time for 
Water Quality Certification Application

    On May 24, 2022, Rye Development on behalf of FFP Project 101, LLC 
submitted to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) 
evidence of its application for a Clean Water Act section 401(a)(1) 
water quality certification filed with Washington State Department of 
Ecology (Washington Ecology), in conjunction with the above captioned 
project. Pursuant to section 401 of the Clean Water Act \1\ and section 
4.34(b)(5) of the Commission's regulations,\2\ a state certifying 
agency is deemed to have waived its certifying authority if it fails or 
refuses to act on a certification request within a reasonable period of 
time, which is one year after the date the certification request was 
received. Accordingly, we hereby notify Washington Ecology of the 
following:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1).
    \2\ 18 CFR 4.34(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Date that Washington Ecology Received the Certification Request: 
May 23, 2022.
    If Washington Ecology fails or refuses to act on the water quality 
certification request on or before May 23, 2023, then the agency 
certifying authority is deemed waived pursuant to section 401(a)(1) of 
the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1).

    Dated: May 31, 2022.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-12052 Filed 6-3-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Pursuant to Fifth Circuit Rule47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should *

not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Fifth

Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41136

Summary Calendar

JESSIE JONES, III

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF

CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION

Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:02-CV-673

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jessie Jones, III, Texas prisoner # 905756, was convicted by a jury of

attempted capital murder and was sentenced by the trial court to seventy-five

years of imprisonment. The district court denied Jones’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254

petition, concluding in relevant part that Jones’s assertion that trial counsel

rendered ineffective assistance by failing to give Jones proper advice that would

have enabled him to make an informed decision whether to have the trial court

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

March 25, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 05-41136

2

or the jury assess punishment was procedurally defaulted. Jones contends that

this claim, raised for the first time in a supplement to Jones’s first state

postconviction application, was not procedurally defaulted. Because the Texas

Court of Criminal Appeals “denied” Jones’s first postconviction application, it did

not explicitly rely on a state procedural rule to adjudicate Jones’s ineffective

assistance claim. See Miller v. Johnson, 200 F.3d 274, 281 (5th Cir. 2000);

Glover v. Cain, 128 F.3d 900, 902 (5th Cir. 1997). Moreover, there is no evidence

that Texas courts consistently hold that supplements to a pending first

postconviction application are successive, and no rule requires such a dismissal

in a noncapital case. See Martin v. Maxey, 98 F.3d 844, 847 (5th Cir. 1996).

The respondents contend for the first time on appeal that Jones’s § 2254

petition is untimely because Jones failed to notify the district court that the

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals had ruled on his second state postconviction

application before the district court awarded a stay in the federal proceedings

so that Jones could exhaust his state remedies through that second application.

The respondents alternatively assert that the one-year period continued to run

when Jones failed to notify the district court of the Texas Court of Criminal

Appeals’s ruling within thirty days. Because the respondent has raised these

claims for the first time on appeal and Jones did not have notice or an

opportunity to respond to this assertion, we decline to exercise any jurisdiction

to consider the claim at this time. See Fisher v. Texas, 169 F.3d 295, 300–02 (5th

Cir. 1999). Consequently, the judgment of the district court is VACATED and

the case is REMANDED for further proceedings in light of this ruling.