alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND
AS OF JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000910639
<NAME> FARADAY FINANCIAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,561
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,246
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,807)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  15
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (15)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (15)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (15)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 99.4**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Paul J. Plante, certify that: 

 

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Reptron Electronics, Inc.; 

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis annual report; 

 

3.  Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this annual report; 

 

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and wehave: 

 

a)  designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made know to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annualreport is being prepared; 

 

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and 

 

c)  presented in this annual reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 

 

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

 

b)  any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; 

 

6.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there weresignificant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

Eastern District of Texas Headwater Research LLC Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al. 2:23-cv-00641-JRG-RSP Headwater Research LLC 01/03/2024 /s/ Philip Wang Philip Wang CA Bar No. 262239

Russ August & Kabat 

12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90025 pwang@raklaw.com (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00641-JRG-RSP Document 13 Filed 01/03/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 797
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 Eastern District of Texas

Hanshow Technology Co.,Ltd. et al

SES-Imagotag SA et al

2:23-cv-00617

 Hanshow Technology Co.,Ltd.; Shanghai Hanshi Information Technology Co.,Ltd

01/26/2024

Jamie Lucia (CA Bar No. 246163)

Steptoe LLP

One Market Plaza, Steuart Tower

10th Floor, Suite 1070

San Francisco, CA 94105

jlucia@steptoe.com

(415) 365-6711

(415) 365-6699

Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 13 Filed 01/26/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 319
r1C,1"114

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OFFIViaTtilA

PR 06-0422

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF

JOSE B. LORENZO

SEP 0 1 20n

Bowen Greenwood

Uerk of Supreme Court

Stain citly

'`E'R

Jose B. Lorenzo has petitioned the Court to waive the three-year test requirement

for the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination (MPRE) for purposes of his

application for admission by motion to the State Bar of Montana. By rule, applicants for

adrnission by motion must provide evidence of the requisite score on an MPRE taken

"within three years preceding the date of the application for admission." Rule IV.A.3,

Rules of Admission. Lorenzo passed the MPRE in 1998 when seeking adrnission to the

practice of law in Florida. He was admitted to the Florida Bar in 1998 and the District of

Columbia Bar in 1999, and has rernained a member of good standing in both of those bars

since then. Good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition ofJose B. Lorenzo to waive the threeyear test requirernent for the MPRE for purposes of his current application for admission

by motion to the State Bar of Montana is GRANTED.

The Clerk shall mail a copy of this order to Petitioner and to the Adrninistrator of

the Board of Bar Examiners at the State Bar of Montana.

DATED this / day of Septernber, 2020.

Chief Justice

09/01/2020

Case Number: PR 06-0422
Exhibit 10.3

 

March 30, 2012

 

American General Assurance Company

c/o SunAmerica Financial Group, Inc.

2727-A Allen Parkway

Houston, Texas 77019

Attention:  Chief Financial Officer

 

American General Assurance Company

c/o SunAmerica Financial Group, Inc.

1999 Avenue of the Stars

Los Angeles, CA 90067

Attention:  General Counsel

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

Reference is made to that certain Unconditional Capital Maintenance Agreement dated as of March 30, 2011 (the “Capital Maintenance Agreement”) by and between American International Group, Inc. and American General Assurance Company (the “Company”).  Capitalized terms, unless otherwise defined herein, shall have the meanings set forth in the Capital Maintenance Agreement.

 

Pursuant to paragraph 3 of the Capital Maintenance Agreement, the undersigned parties hereby agree that effective as of March 30, 2012, the Specified Minimum Percentage shall equal 435%.  Accordingly, Schedule 1 to the Capital Maintenance Agreement shall be restated as follows:

 

“The Specified Minimum Percentage shall equal 435% of the Company’s Company Action Level RBC.”

 











 

	
 
    	
Yours sincerely,
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ David   L. Herzog
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Name: David   L. Herzog
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Title: Executive   Vice President and
   Chief Financial Officer
    


 

Acknowledged and agreed:

 

AMERICAN GENERAL ASSURANCE COMPANY

 

 

	
By:
    	
/s/ Don   W. Cummings
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Name: Don   W. Cummings
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Title:   Senior Vice President
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 10.1.1(C)


                           Magnesium Corporation of America
                              238 North 2200 West Street
                               Salt Lake City, UT 84116



July 22, 1998


Mr. Howard I. Kaplan
C/O Magnesium Corporation of America
238 North 2200 West Street
Salt Lake City, UT 84116

Dear Howard:

Reference is made to your Employment Agreement with this Corporation dated
September 1, 1989 (the "Agreement").

This will confirm our agreement with you as follows:

The base salary provided in Section 2(a) of the agreement is increased from
$94,723 to $120,000, effective this date.

The parties reaffirm the Agreement as amended hereby.

Please confirm your agreement to the foregoing by signing and returning the
enclosed copy.

                                             Very truly yours,

                                             MAGNESIUM CORPORATION
                                                  OF AMERICA


                                             By  /s/ Michael H. Legge



CONFIRMED AND AGREED TO:




/s/ Howard I. Kaplan
ex10_1.htm








Exhibit No. 10.1


 


Execution Copy







AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


with STEVEN J. SMITH









THIS AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”), effective as of March 19, 2012, by and between Journal Communications, Inc., a Wisconsin corporation (the “Company”), and Steven J. Smith (the “Executive”), amends that certain Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of December 15, 2010, by and between the Company and the Executive (the “Employment Agreement”).







In consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and the continued employment of the Executive by the Company, the parties agree as follows:







1.  The Employment Agreement is hereby amended by deleting Section 3(a) thereof in its entirety and substituting therefor the following:







“(a)           Base Salary. The Executive’s compensation during the Employment Period shall be determined by the Compensation Committee (or other appropriate committee) of the Board, subject to this Section 3. During the Employment Period, the Executive shall receive an annual base salary (“Annual Base Salary”) of not less than his aggregate annual base salary from the Company and its affiliates as in effect immediately before the date of this Agreement. The Annual Base Salary shall be payable in accordance with the Company’s regular payroll practice for its senior executives, as in effect from time to time. During the Employment Period, the Annual Base Salary shall be reviewed for possible increase at least annually. Any increase in the Annual Base Salary shall not limit or reduce any other obligation of the Company under this Agreement. The Annual Base Salary shall not be reduced after any such increase, and the term “Annual Base Salary” shall thereafter refer to the Annual Base Salary as so increased.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, Executive’s Annual Base Salary as of the end of the first quarter of 2009 was reduced by 6% beginning with the second quarter of 2009, which reduced amount shall be his Annual Base Salary hereunder, subject to any increases thereafter determined by the Compensation Committee to be appropriate from time to time.  Executive hereby waives any claim he may have had to a higher Annual Base Salary in fiscal years 2010, 2011 or 2012 under the Employment Agreement as in effect prior to March 19, 2012.”







2.  The Employment Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following sentence after the second sentence of Section 3(b) thereof:







“Notwithstanding the foregoing, Executive hereby waives any claims he may have had under the Employment Agreement to an annual bonus opportunity for fiscal year 2009.”


 




  





  











  











3.  As amended hereby, the Employment Agreement, as heretofore amended, shall be and remain in full force and effect.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.


 




	 	
JOURNAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	
By: 

	 /s/ Roger D. Peirce	 
	 	 	
Roger D. Peirce

	 
	 	 	
Chair, Compensation Committee

	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	
EXECUTIVE

	 
	 	 	 
	 	 /s/ Steven J. Smith	 
	 	
Steven J. Smith

	 







 


 


  - 2 -
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

RAMASWAMY RAVIKUMAR, M.D.,

Plaintiff, 

v.

MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM OF 

EAST TEXAS D/V/A CHI ST. LUKE’S 

HEALTH MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 

LUFKIN, et al, 

Defendants.

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CAS NO. 2:23-CV-00560-JRG-RSP

ORDER

Dr. Ravikumar previously filed an Application for Preliminary Injunction (the 

"Motion"). (Dkt. No. 2.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation 

(Dkt. No. 88) in which he recommended den yin g the Motion. Dr. Ravikumar has now 

filed Objections to Magistrate Judge Payne's Report and Recommendation. (Dkt. No. 91.) 

After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on the Motion, the Report and 

Recommendation, and the briefing on Dr. Ravikumar’s Objections, the Court agrees with the 

reasoning provided within the Report and Recommendation and concludes that the Objections fail 

to show that the Report and Recommendation was erroneous. Consequently, the Court 

OVERRULES Dr. Ravikumar’s Objections and ADOPTS the Report and 

Recommendation and ORDERS that the Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. No. 2) is 

DENIED. 

Case 2:23-cv-00560-JRG-RSP Document 94 Filed 07/09/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1557
____________________________________

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 9th day of July, 2024.

Case 2:23-cv-00560-JRG-RSP Document 94 Filed 07/09/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1558
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         242,867
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  627,986
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,630
<INVENTORY>                                     19,430
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,073,925
<PP&E>                                         958,736
<DEPRECIATION>                                 322,311
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,947,496
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          624,784
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       114,919
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,182,646
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,947,496
<SALES>                                      3,168,955
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,168,955
<CGS>                                        1,327,782
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,325,694
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               288,865
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              85,760
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (531,364)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (531,364)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 571,794
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    40,430
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

ORVELI LUVIANO-MONTALVO

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NUMBER 4:23-CR-00276

ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY

The Court referred this matter to the United States Magistrate Judge for administration of 

a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a 

hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court accept 

Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment.

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings.

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of 

the United States Magistrate Judge. The court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance 

of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report.

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Orveli LuvianoMontalvo GUILTY of Count One of the Indictment, charging a violation of Title 8 U.S.C. § 1326

- Reentry of a Deported Alien.

Case 4:23-cr-00276-ALM-AGD Document 25 Filed 08/20/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 47
Case 4:23-cr-00276-ALM-AGD Document 25 Filed 08/20/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 48
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       3,789,000
<SECURITIES>                                17,633,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               23,187,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,605,000
<INVENTORY>                                 33,607,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            79,294,000
<PP&E>                                      15,524,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              95,618,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       34,906,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  60,697,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                95,618,000
<SALES>                                     48,080,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            50,695,000
<CGS>                                       41,556,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,346,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              46,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (960,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (960,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (960,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)
        

</TABLE>
Jaime MONZON-SILVA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7853.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       4,143,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  113,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    24,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,870,000
<PP&E>                                      52,593,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,017,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              53,514,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       55,578,000
<BONDS>                                     48,250,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,568,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                53,514,000
<SALES>                                      1,752,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            29,281,000
<CGS>                                        2,303,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               24,615,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,682,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                58,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,761,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                223,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            223,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   223,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00



</TABLE>