alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-40148 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JUAN CARLOS GALICIA, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-99-CR-40-1

- - - - - - - - - - August 23, 2000 Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Carlos Galicia has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Galicia filed a response which this court has considered. However, our independent review of the brief, the record, and Galicia’s response, discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities in this case, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          TITLE 18, U.S.C. SECTION 1350

       In connection with the Annual Report of Mendocino Brewing Company, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Vijay Mallya,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

       1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Dr. Vijay Mallya
                                              Chairman of the Board and
                                              Chief Executive Officer
                                              Date: April 14, 2004

       A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this

appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2)(C); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore

ordered submitted without oral argument.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

AUG 26 1999

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 99-2045

JEANETTE M. TRUJILLO,

Defendant-Appellant.

(D.C. No. CIV-98-1051-JC)

(D. N.M.)

 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

 

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, BALDOCK, and HENRY, Circuit Judges.**

 

Defendant Jeanette M. Trujillo pled guilty in federal district court to armed

bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) & (d) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Plaintiff

did not move to withdraw her guilty plea and did not perfect a direct criminal appeal.

Instead, Plaintiff filed a petition to vacate her sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 in the

district court claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. According to Plaintiff, defense
2

counsel failed to properly advise her as to the consequences of her guilty plea. In a

thorough Memorandum Opinion and Order, the district court summarily dismissed the

petition. See Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2255 Petitions. Now before us is

Plaintiff’s application for a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).

A defendant may appeal the denial of a § 2255 petition only if “a circuit justice or

judge” issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of

appealability “may issue . . . only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” Id. § 2253(c)(2). We conclude that Petitioner has failed

to make the required showing.

We have thoroughly reviewed Defendant’s application for a certificate of

appealability, her brief, the district court’s order, and the entire record before us. We

conclude the Plaintiff’s claims are meritless substantially for the reasons set forth in the

district court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order dismissing the petition. Because

Plaintiff has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, we

deny her request for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

Entered for the Court,

Bobby R. Baldock

Circuit Judge
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 6, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-11021 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JAMES LEMARC BYRD, also known as Mark Byrd, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 7:04-CR-22-ALL

-------------------- Before REAVLEY, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, James LeMarc Byrd raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Daugherty , 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir. 2001), which rejected a Commerce Clause challenge to the felon-in-possession-of-a-firearm statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
Matthew Mounir AWAD, Petitioner, v. Charles L. RYAN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 18-9494

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Ravneet SINGH, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-572

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT
3.1
 
    FIRST
 SECOND
 THIRD
 FOURTH
 COMMON STOCK
 Voting Rights




---



##### 



Removal of Directors for Cause
 Dividends
 Rights on Liquidation
 Split, Subdivision or Combination
 2




---



##### 



Conversion
   3




---



##### 



Action Without Meeting
 FIFTH
 SIXTH
   SEVENTH Personal Liability of Directors
 4




---



##### 



Right to Indemnification
 Right of Claimant to Bring Suit
 5




---



##### 



Non-Exclusivity of Rights
 Insurance
 EIGHTH
 NINTH
 TENTH
   6




---



##### 



By:
    /s/ Joseph J. Lodovic, IVJoseph J. Lodovic, IVPresident 7
Tzedkiyah El BEY, Petitioner, v. DOUGHTERY COUNTY STATE COURT, et al.

No. 19-7678.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# C_2017362EN.01003801.xml

| 26.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 362/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 362/38

---

Corrigendum to the Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Council Directive 89/686/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to personal protective equipment

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 344 of 13 October 2017
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 344 of 13 October 2017

(2017/C 362/06)

On page 4, Standard ‘EN 207:2017, Personal eye-protection equipment — Filters and eye-protectors against laser radiation (laser eye-protectors)’, fifth column:

for:

for

‘30.9.2017’,

read:

read

‘30.10.2017’;

on page 10, Standard ‘EN 566:2017, Mountaineering equipment — Slings — Safety requirements and test methods’, fifth column:

for:

for

‘30.9.2017’,

read:

read

‘30.10.2017’;

on page 10, Standard ‘EN 568:2015, Mountaineering equipment — Ice anchors — Safety requirements and test methods’, fifth column:

for:

for

‘31.5.2016’,

read:

read

‘9.9.2016’;

on page 11, Standard ‘EN 943-1:2015, Protective clothing against dangerous solid, liquid and gaseous chemicals, including liquid and solid aerosols — Part 1: Performance requirements for Type 1 (gas-tight) chemical protective suits’, fifth column:

for:

for

‘29.2.2016’,

read:

read

‘9.9.2016’;

on page 11, Standard ‘EN 958:2017, Mountaineering equipment — Energy absorbing systems for use in klettersteig (via ferrata) climbing — Safety requirements and test methods’, fifth column:

for:

for

‘30.9.2017’,

read:

read

‘13.10.2017’;

on page 15, Standard ‘EN ISO 12127-1:2015, Clothing for protection against heat and flame — Determination of contact heat transmission through protective clothing or constituent materials — Part 1: Contact heat produced by heating cylinder (ISO 12127-1:2015)’, fifth column:

for:

for

‘30.6.2016’,

read:

read

‘9.9.2016’.

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 7, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-10584 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SANTOS CUETO-PARRA, also known as Jose Santos Morales, also known as Santos Cueyo, also known as Santos Cueto Parva, also known as Angel Rodriguez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-129-ALL

-------------------- Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Santos CuetoParra raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 1, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 32988]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11615]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

16 CFR Part 1225


Safety Standard for Hand-Held Infant Carriers

CFR Correction

    This rule is being published by the Office of the Federal Register 
to correct an editorial or technical error that appeared in the most 
recent annual revision of the Code of Federal Regulations.

0
In Title 16 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1000 to End, 
revised as of January 1, 2022, in Sec.  1225.2, add ``email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e182919282cc8e92a182919282cf868e97"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="51322122327c3e2211322122327f363e27">[email protected]</span></a>,'' in the fifth sentence after the telephone number ``301-
504-7479''.

[FR Doc. 2022-11615 Filed 5-31-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 0099-10-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                            1283
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    14103
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      42868
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 59291
<PP&E>                                           53034
<DEPRECIATION>                                    8359
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  106133
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            28669
<BONDS>                                          34000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            70
<OTHER-SE>                                       40564
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    106133
<SALES>                                         177531
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                177531
<CGS>                                           130591
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    44950
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2438
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (448)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (165)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (283)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (283)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Leslie RUTLEDGE, Attorney General of Arkansas, petitioner, v. PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION.

No. 18-540.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted.
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

 v. 

T-MOBILE US, INC., T-MOBILE USA, 

INC., and SPRINT CORP., 

Defendants. 

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00377-JRG-RSP 

JURY DEMANDED 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

 Notice is hereby given that Robert Christopher Bunt of Parker Bunt & Ainsworth, PC 

enters his appearance in this matter as additional counsel for Plaintiff Headwater Research LLC. 

 Mr. Bunt may receive all communications from the Court and all parties at Parker Bunt & 

Ainsworth, PC, 100 East Ferguson, Suite 418, Tyler, Texas 75702; Telephone 903-531-3535; 

Email: rcbunt@pbatyler.com. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: October 10, 2023. 

/s/ Robert Christopher Bunt 

Robert Christopher Bunt 

Texas State Bar No. 00787165 

PARKER, BUNT & AINSWORTH, P.C. 

100 E. Ferguson Suite 418 

Tyler, Texas 75702 

Tel.: (903) 531-3535 

Marc Fenster 

CA State Bar No. 181067 

Email: mfenster@raklaw.com 

Reza Mirzaie 

CA State Bar No. 246953 

Email: rmirzaie@raklaw.com 

Brian Ledahl 

Case 2:23-cv-00377-JRG-RSP Document 23 Filed 10/10/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 295
2 

CA State Bar No. 186579 

Email: bledahl@raklaw.com 

Ben Wang 

CA State Bar No. 228712 

Email: bwang@raklaw.com 

Dale Chang 

CA State Bar No. 248657 

Email: dchang@raklaw.com 

Paul Kroeger 

CA State Bar No. 229074 

Email: pkroeger@raklaw.com 

Neil A. Rubin 

CA State Bar No. 250761 

Email: nrubin@raklaw.com 

Kristopher Davis 

CA State Bar No. 329627 

Email: kdavis@raklaw.com 

James S. Tsuei 

CA State Bar No. 285530 

Email: jtsuei@raklaw.com 

Philip Wang 

CA State Bar No. 262239 

Email: pwang@raklaw.com 

Amy Hayden 

CA State Bar No. 287026 

Email: ahayden@raklaw.com 

Jason M. Wietholter 

CA State Bar No. 337139 

Email: jwietholter@raklaw.com 

RUSS AUGUST & KABAT 

12424 Wilshire Blvd. 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90025 

Telephone: 310-826-7474 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF 

Headwater Research LLC 

Case 2:23-cv-00377-JRG-RSP Document 23 Filed 10/10/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 296
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I certify that the foregoing document was filed electronically on October 10, 2023 and 

has been served on all counsel who have consented to electronic service. 

/s/ Robert Christopher Bunt 

Robert Christopher Bunt 

Case 2:23-cv-00377-JRG-RSP Document 23 Filed 10/10/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 297
IN RE David LOPEZ, Petitioner.

No. 19-7792.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of prohibition denied.
Order entered January 10, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01123-CR

MICHAEL MARSENE WALKER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-23751-K

ORDER

The Court GRANTS appellant’s December 30, 2013 motion to supplement the appellate 

record.

We ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record, 

within FIFTEEN (15) DAYS from the date of this order, that contains State’s Exhibit #1-

Probation File.

We ORDER appellant to file the brief within FORTY-FIVE (45) DAYS from the date 

of this order.

We ORDER the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Gary FitzSimmons, 

Dallas County District Clerk.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/06/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      831,318
COMMITMENTS
  97,307   34,919  262,811  454,303  512,697  814,421  810,427   16,897   20,891

CHANGES FROM 07/30/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     22,016)
  -2,592    2,739    3,610   19,722   17,116   20,740   23,465    1,277   -1,449

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    11.7      4.2     31.6     54.6     61.7     98.0     97.5      2.0      2.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      159)
      47       36       67       68       67      148      141
```

----

Updated August 9, 2013
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 62 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 62

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Wednesday, 
October 30, 2013, Thursday, October 31, 2013, or Friday, November 1, 
2013, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its 
Majority Leader or his designee, it stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on 
Tuesday, November 12, 2013, or until the

              

 time of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 
resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. (a) The Speaker or his designee, after consultation with 
the Minority Leader of the House, shall notify the Members of the House 
to reassemble at such place and time as he may designate if, in his 
opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
    (b) After reassembling pursuant to subsection (a), when the House 
adjourns on a motion offered pursuant to this subsection by its 
Majority Leader or his designee, the House shall again stand adjourned 
pursuant to the first section of this concurrent resolution.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 30, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 62

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

        Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of 
                            Representatives.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<LEGEND>
      This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from the
      Company's  Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended June 30, 1997 and is qualified
      in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
      <S>                                         <C>
      <PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-MOS
      <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         SEP-30-1997
      <PERIOD-END>                                              JUN-30-1997
      <CASH>                                                      38,350,101
      <SECURITIES>                                               130,793,948
      <RECEIVABLES>                                               27,335,027
      <ALLOWANCES>                                                (2,561,704)
      <INVENTORY>                                                  2,851,708
      <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           205,967,544
      <PP&E>                                                     314,986,397
      <DEPRECIATION>                                              14,630,495
      <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             682,026,422
      <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       44,541,243
      <BONDS>                                                    486,066,138
      <COMMON>                                                   132,399,992
      <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       52,968,750
      <PREFERRED>                                                          0
      <OTHER-SE>                                                   4,706,675
      <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               682,026,422
      <SALES>                                                     74,923,607
      <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            74,923,607
      <CGS>                                                       53,806,948
      <TOTAL-COSTS>                                              129,607,148
      <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            (9,533,192)
      <LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
      <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          21,321,039
      <INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (66,468,388)
      <INCOME-TAX>                                                   843,143
      <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        (67,311,531)
      <DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
      <EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
      <CHANGES>                                                            0
      <NET-INCOME>                                               (67,311,531)
      <EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    (2.87)
      <EPS-DILUTED>                                                    (2.87)
              

</TABLE>
Jeremy ACHEY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7760.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.