alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Charles HEAD, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5513

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER PARTNERS II LLC,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

T-MOBILE USA, INC. and SPRINT

LLC, 

Defendants. 

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-cv-00015-JRG-RSP

ORDER

Before the Court is the Unopposed Motion for Leave to Intervene filed by 

Ericsson Inc., Dkt. No. 55, and the Unopposed Motion for Leave to Intervene filed by Nokia of 

America Corporation, Dkt. No. 59. Nokia and Ericsson moved to intervene pursuant to 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a) or, in the alternative, pursuant to Rule 24(b). Having 

considered the Motions, their unopposed nature, and the relevant authorities, the Court finds 

that the Motions should be and hereby are GRANTED. Accordingly, Nokia and Ericsson 

are permitted to intervene in the above captioned case under Rule 24(b), and are GRANTED

LEAVE to file responsive pleadings in intervention. 

Case 2:24-cv-00015-JRG-RSP Document 63 Filed 07/19/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 584
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS RESTATED SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 3 AND 4
OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR TO-DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. THIS SCHEDULE HAS BEEN
RESTATED TO REFLECT THE EFFECT OF FASB #128, EARNINGS PER SHARE.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                          11,681
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,149
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               143,277
<PP&E>                                       1,098,901
<DEPRECIATION>                               (188,812)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,053,366
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,103
<BONDS>                                        534,408
<COMMON>                                           236
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     394,912
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,053,366
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                88,059
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   52,998
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,018
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,599
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,599
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,306
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,293
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .27
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 99.03

                                                              Company's Form 8-K
                                                                  August 7, 1996

                                                                          Page 2


         In July 1996, a complaint seeking equitable relief was filed in the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York by the U.S. Department
of Justice, naming twenty-four major brokerage firms, including the Company's
subsidiary Smith Barney Inc., as defendants. A proposed settlement has been
agreed to by the parties, subject to approval of the court. Pursuant to this
settlement, the defendants, without admitting any liability, would agree not to
engage in certain practices relating to the quoting of Nasdaq securities and
would further agree to implement a program to ensure compliance with federal
antitrust laws and with the terms of the settlement. No monetary fines or
penalties are imposed as part of the settlement.
# C_2017056EN.01000601.xml

| 22.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/6

---

Reorganisation measures

Decision on measures to reorganise ‘International Life, Life Insurance SA’

(Publication in accordance with Article 271 of Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II))

(2017/C 56/07)

| Insurance undertaking | ‘International Life, Life Insurance S.A.’, registered office at Kifisias 7 & Neapoleos 2, 15123 Marousi, General Commercial Register (GEMI) No 000954901000, Tax Identification Number (TIN) 094327788, Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) 213800HFA633NACOEZ72 |
| --- | --- |
| Date, nature of the decision and date of entry into force | Decision No 214/1/13.1.2017 of the Credit and Insurance Committee of the Bank of Greece concerning:
  the extension of the suspension of payments and disbursements by the insurance undertaking until 28 February 2017, as imposed by Decision No 185/1/12.5.2016.
  Entry into force: as of the adoption date (13.1.2017)
  End of validity: 28.2.2017 |
| Competent authorities | Bank of Greece |
| Address: E. Venizelou 21 |
| 10250 Athens |
| GREECE |

Insurance undertaking

‘International Life, Life Insurance S.A.’, registered office at Kifisias 7 & Neapoleos 2, 15123 Marousi, General Commercial Register (GEMI) No 000954901000, Tax Identification Number (TIN) 094327788, Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) 213800HFA633NACOEZ72

Date, nature of the decision and date of entry into force

Decision No 214/1/13.1.2017 of the Credit and Insurance Committee of the Bank of Greece concerning:

the extension of the suspension of payments and disbursements by the insurance undertaking until 28 February 2017, as imposed by Decision No 185/1/12.5.2016.

Entry into force: as of the adoption date (13.1.2017)

End of validity:

Competent authorities

Bank of Greece

Address: E. Venizelou 21

10250 Athens

GREECE

Supervisory authorities

| Bank of Greece |
| --- |
| Address: E. Venizelou 21 |
| 10250 Athens |
| GREECE |

Bank of Greece

Address: E. Venizelou 21

10250 Athens

GREECE

Administrator appointed

Ioannis Peristeris, father’s name Dimitrios

Applicable law

Greek law in accordance with Article 229 of Law No 4364/2016

---
Jimcy MCGIRT, Petitioner, v. OKLAHOMA.

No. 18-9526.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Motion of the parties, Muscogee (Creek) Nation, and the Solicitor General for enlargement *2563of time for oral argument and for divided argument granted in part, and the time is divided as follows: 15 minutes for petitioner, 15 minutes for Muscogee (Creek) Nation, 15 minutes for respondent, and 15 minutes for the Solicitor General.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: August 5, 2008
    
    By
    
    /s/ Cary L. Deacon

Cary L. DeaconPresident and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2017361EN.01003101.xml

| 25.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 361/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 361/31

---

Adoption of Commission Decision on the notification by the Czech Republic of a modified transitional national plan referred to in Article 32(6) of Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions

(2017/C 361/03)

On 20 October 2017, the Commission adopted Commission Decision C(2017) 6985 on the notification by the Czech Republic of a modified transitional national plan referred to in Article 32(6) of Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control) (1).

1

This document is available on the following internet site: https://circabc.europa.eu/w/browse/36205e98-8e7a-47d7-808d-931bc5baf6ee

---

(1)  OJ L 334, 17.12.2010, p. 17.

1

---
John Joseph DEBLASE, Petitioner, v. ALABAMA.

No. 19-7236.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    The Quarterly Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Quarterly
Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: February 9, 2006
    
    By /s/ J. Reid PorterJ. Reid PorterChief Financial Officer
Anthony Earl RIDLEY, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SEDGWICK COUNTY, KANSAS, et al.

No. 19-7441.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

12/20/2023

Eastern District of Texas

PUSH DATA LLC,

4:23-cv-1121

The Kroger Company

The Kroger Company

c/o its Registered Agent

A Registered Agent, Inc.,

8 The Green, Ste A

Dover, DE 19901

Trevor Beaty

trevor@beatylegal.com

514 North Elm Street

Sherman, Texas 75090

Telephone: (903) 287-5121

Facsimile: (903) 287-5145

Case 4:23-cv-01121-ALM Document 4 Filed 12/20/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 313
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

4:23-cv-1121

0.00

Case 4:23-cv-01121-ALM Document 4 Filed 12/20/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 314
WI-FI ONE, LLC, petitioner, v. BROADCOM CORPORATION, et al.; Wi-Fi One, LLC, petitioner, v. Broadcom Corporation, et al.; and Wi-Fi One, LLC, petitioner, v. Broadcom Corporation, et al.

No. 18-599.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

*827Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION 

Veritas Vincit, LLC and William Berry 

Dean, III, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

Fred Alan Brown, Charles William 

Durham, II, Reticulum Management, 

LLC, and Birnam Wood Capital, LLC, 

 Defendants. 

Civil Action No. 

4:24-cv-00079-JRG 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL 

Notice is hereby given that Steven Callahan enters his appearance as counsel for 

Plaintiffs Veritas Vincit, LLC and William Berry Dean, III in the above-referenced proceeding 

for the purpose of receiving notices from the Court. Mr. Callahan is currently admitted to 

practice in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Mr. Callahan’s 

contact information is as follows: 

Steven Callahan 

Charhon Callahan Robson & Garza, PLLC 

3333 Lee Parkway, Suite 460 

Dallas, Texas 75219 

Telephone: (469) 587-7240 

Telecopier: (214) 764-8392 

Texas State Bar No. 24053122 

scallahan@ccrglaw.com 

Case 4:24-cv-00079-JRG Document 8 Filed 02/29/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 88
2 

Dated: February 29, 2024 Respectfully submitted, 

STEVEN CALLAHAN

Texas State Bar No. 24053122 

 scallahan@ccrglaw.com 

CHARHON CALLAHAN 

ROBSON & GARZA, PLLC

3333 Lee Parkway, Suite 460 

Dallas, Texas 75219 

Telephone: (214) 521-6400 

Telecopier: (214) 764-8392 

Counsel for Plaintiffs Veritas Vincit, LLC 

and William Berry Dean, III 

Case 4:24-cv-00079-JRG Document 8 Filed 02/29/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 89
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a) on February 29, 2024. As such, this document was served 

on all counsel who are deemed to have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV5(a)(3)(A). 

 

 STEVEN CALLAHAN

Case 4:24-cv-00079-JRG Document 8 Filed 02/29/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 90
Norma L. COOKE, Petitioner, v. JACKSON NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

No. 18-1588

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.1****Section 1350 Certifications**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Strategic Diagnostics Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, based on suchofficer’s knowledge, that: (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period endedJune 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language insuch filing.        Date: August 13, 2007 /s/ Matthew H. Knight   Matthew H. Knight   Chief Executive Officer
Keith ALEXANDER, petitioner, v. Robert GILMORE, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Greene.

No. 18-8296.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 15, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
cc: Hon. Elliott A. Sattler, District Judge Matthew Marcewicz Robison Belaustegui Sharp & Low Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A 

### e
1

LEGAL02/43095198v3 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

PAY AS YOU GO, LLC,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC.

Defendants. 

Civil Action No.: 2:23-cv-463-JRG 

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR 

OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

Verizon Communications Inc. (“VCI”) respectfully moves for a one-week extension of 

time to December 29, 2023, to answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff Pay As You Go, LLC 

(“PAYG”) Complaint. Plaintiff PAYG does not oppose this extension. Good cause exists for a 

one-week extension to allow VCI to continue to evaluate PAYG’s allegations and to formulate its 

response. Moreover, the above captioned case has been consolidated for pre-trial purposes with 

the case captioned Pay As You Go, LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., Case No. 2:23-cv-501-JRG into 

the lead case captioned Pay As You Go, LLC v. AT&T Inc., Case No. 2:23-cv-462-JRG. Because 

T-Mobile’s Answer is due on January 6, 2024, a one-week extension of the deadline in this case 

to December 29, 2023, will not delay the progress of the consolidated cases. 

Dated this 22nd day of December, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/ Ross R. Barton 

Ross R. Barton (NC Bar No. 37179) 

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

1120 S. Tryon Street, Suite 300 

Charlotte, NC 28283-6818

Case 2:23-cv-00462-JRG Document 13 Filed 12/22/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 44
2

LEGAL02/43095198v3 

Email: ross.barton@alston.com

Telephone: 704-444-1000 

Facsimile: 704-444-1111 

Deron R. Dacus 

Deron R. Dacus (TX Bar No. 00790553) 

THE DACUS FIRM 

821 ESE Loop 323, Suite 430 

Tyler, Texas 75701 

Telephone: (903) 705-1117 

Facsimile: (903) 581-2543 (fax) 

E-Mail: ddacus@dacusfirm.com

Counsel for Verizon Communications Inc.

Case 2:23-cv-00462-JRG Document 13 Filed 12/22/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 45
3

LEGAL02/43095198v3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was filed electronically in 

compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). Therefore, this document was served on all counsel on 

December 22, 2023. 

/s/ Deron R. Dacus

Deron R. Dacus 

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

The undersigned certifies that Verizon’s counsel has complied with the meet and confer 

requirement in Local Rule CV-7(h) and that the foregoing motion is unopposed. The parties met 

and conferred on December 22, 2023 via email. Counsel for Plaintiff stated that it does not 

oppose this motion.

/s/ Deron Dacus

Deron Dacus

Case 2:23-cv-00462-JRG Document 13 Filed 12/22/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 46
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1






                         Consent of Independent Auditors


The Board of Directors
Enlighten Software Solutions, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-73588) on Form S-8 of ENlighten Software Solutions, Inc. of our report dated
February 7, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of ENlighten
Software Solutions, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and
cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 1996,
which report appears in the December 31, 1996, annual report on Form 10-KSB of
ENlighten Software Solutions, Inc.



                                      KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

San Jose, California
April 10, 1997
**Exhibit 32.1 — Certification of Chief Executive Officer — Sarbanes-Oxley Section 906**Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. section 1350, the undersigned officer of Triad Guaranty Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 andthe information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.      Date:     November 9, 2006           By: /s/ Mark K. Tonnesen
Keith INCHIERCHIERE, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.

No. 19-1068.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

__________________________________________ 

) 

DJAMEL AMEZIANE, ) 

 ) 

 Petitioner, ) 

 ) 

 v. ) Civil Action No. 05-392 (ESH) 

 ) 

BARACK OBAMA, et al., ) UNDER SEAL 

 ) 

 ) 

 Respondents. ) 

__________________________________________) 

ORDER 

For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion [Dkt. No. 364], it is 

hereby 

ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for habeas relief [Dkt. No. 351] is DENIED; it is 

further 

ORDERED that respondents’ motion to dismiss [Dkt. No. 358] is GRANTED; and it is 

further 

ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. 

SO ORDERED.

 /s/ 

 ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE 

 United States District Judge 

Date: July 21, 2014
William MCNEAL, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 19-7251

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District denied.
LIN OUYANG, Petitioner, v. ACHEM INDUSTRY AMERICA, INC.

No. 19-7758.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,**


**SECTION 1350**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Mendocino Brewing Company, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Yashpal Singh, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date:
      March 31, 2008


/s/ Yashpal
              SinghName:
                Yashpal Singh
              Title:
                Chief Executive Officer