alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Angel Noel GUEVARA, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-7133

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petitions for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 07/23/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      798,000
COMMITMENTS
 103,871   30,693  250,806  429,096  496,202  783,773  777,700   14,227   20,300

CHANGES FROM 07/16/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -30,027)
   9,169    2,242  -13,941  -23,484  -15,599  -28,255  -27,298   -1,772   -2,729

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    13.0      3.8     31.4     53.8     62.2     98.2     97.5      1.8      2.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      164)
      51       34       67       66       71      146      146
```

----

Updated July 26, 2013
# C_2017226EN.01000501.xml

| 14.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 226/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 226/5

---

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

(2017/C 226/04)

Pursuant to Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1), the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are hereby amended as follows:

1

2

On page 388, in the explanatory note to CN subheadings ‘9612 10 10 to 9612 10 80 Ribbons’, the following text is added:

On page 388, in the explanatory note to CN subheadings ‘9612 10 10 to 9612 10 80 Ribbons’

‘These subheadings include products which are ready-to-use heat-sensitive inked ribbons, i.e. which are suitable to be used in a typewriter or any other machine incorporating a device for printing, without a further manufacturing process.

The length and width of inked ribbons that are ready-to-use are determined by the type of machine in which they are used.

Products which are not ready-to-use are excluded from these subheadings (generally, Sections VI and VII).’

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1).

1

(2)  OJ C 76, 4.3.2015, p. 1.

2

---
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PERSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PERSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Steinway MusicalInstruments, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September28, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Dennis M. Hanson, Senior Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|              | /s/ Dennis M. Hanson                                         |   |
|-------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|              |                                                         |
|              | Senior Executive Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |
|              | (Principal Financial Officer and Chief  Accounting Officer)  |
|              |                                                         |
| November 11, 2002 |                                                         |

 

----
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

 
 



 
 Lawrence D. Kingsley 

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 

CORPORATION 
 IDEX Corporation 
 1925 West Field Court

 Suite 200 
 Lake Forest, Illinois 60045-4824 
 United States

 www.idexcorp.com 
 September 30, 2010 
 Heath Mitts IDEX
Corporation 1925W. Field Court Lake Forest, IL 60045 
 Dear Heath: 

As part of our ongoing review of our executive compensation programs, IDEX Corporation seeks to ensure
that executives are provided market competitive protection benefits. 
 Based upon the results of
that review, and while we fully expect that IDEX will continue to grow and prosper as an independent publicly-traded company, we are offering the following levels of benefit based upon your role as Vice President, Corporate Finance for IDEX
Corporation in the case of unforeseen circumstances. 

	 •
	  
	 If, in the future, your employment with IDEX Corporation is terminated without cause (“cause”
defined as willful misconduct or fraudulent behavior), IDEX will pay you twelve (12) months’ base salary at the then current monthly base rate plus your targeted annual incentive bonus (MICP or equivalent plan) in a lump sum in exchange
for a signed release within 50 days of your termination. Such benefit will not be applicable in the event of your voluntary termination. 



	 •
	  
	 All other provisions of your current IDEX compensation and benefits programs remain the same.



 Please indicate your acceptance of these provisions below. 

Heath, we appreciate your contributions to IDEX and wish you continuing success. 

Sincerely 
 Lawrence D.Kingsley 
 Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer 
 IDEX Corporation 
 Acceptance of Provisions 
 Heath Mitts Date
Dana ALBRECHT, Petitioner v. Katherine ALBRECHT

No. 19-79

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of New Hampshire denied.
Letter Agreement



 Exhibit 10.2 
 



 
 March 16, 2012 
 Ipsen Biopharm Ltd. 
 Attention: Company Secretary 

190 Bath Road 
 Slough, Berkshire SL1 3XE

 United Kingdom 
  

	 	Re:	Termination of Japan Distribution Rights under Development and Distribution Agreement 

 Dear Company Secretary: 
 This letter is written in connection with the Development and
Distribution Agreement dated March 17, 2006 between Ipsen Biopharm Ltd. (formerly known as Ipsen Ltd) (“Ipsen”) and Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation (“Medicis”), as amended (the “Agreement”).
Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this letter have the meaning set forth in the Agreement. 
 Pursuant to the Agreement, Medicis was
granted rights with respect to the Current Product in the Territory, which includes Japan. Without affecting the remaining rights and obligations of the parties under the Agreement, by signing this letter, Ipsen and Medicis hereby agree to terminate
Medicis’ right to distribute the Current Product in Japan effective as of the date of this letter. Such termination is without liability to either party resulting from such termination. 
 If you agree with the foregoing, please sign and return to me a fully executed copy of this letter. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions. 

Sincerely, 
 Medicis Pharmaceutical
Corporation 
  

			
	By:	 	 /s/ Mark A. Prygocki, Sr.

		 	Mark A. Prygocki, Sr.
		 	President

 7720 N. Dobson Road, Scottsdale, AZ 85256 

602.808.8800 Fax: 602.808.0822 








  
 Page 2 of 2 

Letter dated March 16, 2012 re: termination of Japan rights 

 

 Acknowledged and agreed: 
 Ipsen Biopharm Ltd. 
  

			
	By:	 	 /s/ John Charles Davis

	Name:	 	 John Charles Davis

	Title:	 	 Director and Company Secretary

	Date:	 	 March 26th, 2012


 Cc: 
 SCRAS
S.A.S. 
 Attn: General Counsel 
 24 rue
Erlanger 
 75016 Paris, France
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATION AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000911583
<NAME> STEINWAY MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-03-1998
<CASH>                                           2,527
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   84,863
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,991
<INVENTORY>                                     93,784
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               182,313
<PP&E>                                          84,111
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,568
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 296,952
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,364
<BONDS>                                        125,724
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      88,262
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   296,952
<SALES>                                        220,807
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               220,807
<CGS>                                          148,333
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,976
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,122
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   317
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,057
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,002
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,951
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,051
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,051
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.26
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       I, Robert L. Knauss, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report of Baltic International USA, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Baltic International USA, Inc.

Date: April 14, 2008

                              /s/ Robert L. Knauss
                              -------------------------------------------------
                              Robert L. Knauss
                              Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

RICKY WAYNE BECKETT, §

§

Petitioner, §

§

versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24-CV-33

§

DIRECTOR, TDCJ-ID, §

§

Respondent. §

ORDER ADOPTING THE

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Ricky Wayne Beckett, proceeding pro se, filed this petition for writ of habeas corpus. The

court previously referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States

Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders

of the court. The magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge recommending the petition be dismissed without prejudice. To date, the parties

have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation.

The court has received the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge,

along with the record, pleadings, and all available evidence. After careful review, the court finds

that the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Report are correct. 

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation (#5) is ADOPTED. A final judgment will

be entered dismissing the petition.

Case 1:24-cv-00033-MJT-CLS Document 6 Filed 03/26/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 38
Raheem BROWN, Petitioner, v. Jamey LUTHER, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Smithfield, et al.

No. 19-5354

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION

NETLIST, INC., §

§

Plaintiff, § C.A. No. 2:23-cv-00628-JRG

v. §

§ JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., §

MICRON SEMICONDUCTOR §

PRODUCTS, INC., AND MICRON §

TECHNOLOGY TEXAS LLC, §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSED MOTION TO 

MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER

The Court, having considered Defendants’ Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order to 

remove patent-related deadlines and to apply non-patent civil case scheduling, hereby ORDERS 

that the motion is GRANTED.

Order Granting Motion to Modify Scheduling Order Page Solo

Case 2:23-cv-00628-JRG Document 18-1 Filed 03/04/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1538
David WOOD, Petitioner v. TEXAS.

No. 18-9262

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> 0

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,559
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,684
<ALLOWANCES>                                       458
<INVENTORY>                                     42,684
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                82,092
<PP&E>                                          78,258
<DEPRECIATION>                                  37,629
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 137,414
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,612
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            75
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,242
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   137,414
<SALES>                                        205,407
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               205,407
<CGS>                                          180,205
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  180,205
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,374
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,460
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,368
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,831
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,537
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,537
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .70


</TABLE>
Terry SIMONTON, Jr., Petitioner, v. Mark GARMAN, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Rockview, et al.

No. 19-7360.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 23-12965

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ARMARD DAVIS, 

a.k.a. Black Jack,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Georgia

D.C. Docket No. 5:21-cr-00003-TES-CHW-4

USCA11 Case: 23-12965 Document: 29-1 Date Filed: 02/06/2024 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 23-12965

____________________

Before WILSON, JILL PRYOR, and BRANCH, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:

The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant 

to the appeal waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. 

See United States v. Bushert, 997 F.2d 1343, 1350–51 (11th Cir. 1993) 

(sentence appeal waiver will be enforced if it was made knowingly 

and voluntarily); United States v. Boyd, 975 F.3d 1185, 1192 (11th Cir. 

2020) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced where “it was 

clearly conveyed to the defendant that he was giving up his right 

to appeal under most circumstances” (quotation marks omitted, alterations adopted, emphasis in original)); United States v. GrinardHenry, 399 F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to 

appeal includes waiver of the right to appeal difficult or debatable 

legal issues or even blatant error).

USCA11 Case: 23-12965 Document: 29-1 Date Filed: 02/06/2024 Page: 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER PARTNERS II LLC,

Plaintiff, 

v.

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, D/B/A/ 

VERIZON WIRELESS AND VERIZON 

CORPORATE GROUP INC., 

Defendant.

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-cv-00007-JRG-RSP

ORDER

Before the Court is the Unopposed Motion for Leave to Intervene filed by 

Ericsson Inc., Dkt. No. 45, and the Unopposed Motion for Leave to Intervene filed by Nokia of 

America Corporation, Dkt. No. 48. Nokia and Ericsson moved to intervene pursuant to 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a) or, in the alternative, pursuant to Rule 24(b). Having 

considered the Motions, their unopposed nature, and the relevant authorities, the Court finds 

that the Motions should be and hereby are GRANTED. Accordingly, Nokia and Ericsson 

are permitted to intervene in the above captioned case under Rule 24(b), and are GRANTED

LEAVE to file responsive pleadings in intervention. 

Case 2:24-cv-00007-JRG-RSP Document 51 Filed 07/19/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 518
# C_2017174EN.01000601.xml

| 1.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 174/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 174/6

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2017/C 174/07)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 8.5.2017 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 8.5.2017 – 31.12.2017 |
| Member State | Spain |
| Stock or Group of stocks | POK/56-14 |
| Species | Saithe (Pollachius virens) |
| Zone | VI; Union and international waters of Vb, XII and XIV |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 08/TQ127 |

Date and time of closure

8.5.2017

Duration

8.5.2017 – 31.12.2017

Member State

Spain

Stock or Group of stocks

POK/56-14

Species

Saithe (Pollachius virens)

Pollachius virens

Zone

VI; Union and international waters of Vb, XII and XIV

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

08/TQ127

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
**Exhibit 18.1**

March 25, 2010 

Board of Directors 

International Textile Group, Inc. 

804 Green Valley

Greensboro, NC 27408 

DearDirectors: 

We are providing this letter solely for inclusion as an exhibit to International Textile Group, Inc.’s (the“Company”) Form 10-K filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K. 

We have audited the consolidated financial statementsincluded in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as set forth in our report dated March 25, 2010. As stated in Note 6 to those financial statements, the Company changed its annual goodwillimpairment testing measurement date from September 30 to October 1. Note 6 also states management’s belief that the newly adopted accounting principle is preferable in the circumstances because according to the information availableto the Company, an annual measurement date of October 1 is the date predominantly used in the textile industry in which the Company operates, therefore making the comparison of the Company’s results to those of its competitors moreconsistent. In addition, this change will assist the Company in providing timely financial reporting as it gives the Company more time to complete and report on the impairment analysis. Finally, as the Company’s budget is finalized in thefourth quarter of each year, this change will allow for the most up to date information to be used in forecasts when using an October 1 testing date. 

With regard to the aforementioned accounting change, it should be understood that authoritative criteria have not been established for evaluating the preferability of one acceptable method of accountingover another acceptable method and, in expressing our concurrence below, we have relied on management’s business planning and judgment and on management’s determination that this change in accounting principle is preferable. 

Based on our reading of management’s stated reasons and justification for this change in accounting principle in the Form 10-K, and our discussionswith management as to their judgment about the relevant business planning factors relating to the change, we concur with management that the newly adopted method of accounting is preferable in the Company’s circumstances. 

Very truly yours, 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Joshua Allen BOLEN, Petitioner, v. Erik A. HOOKS, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Public Safety.

No. 19-7632.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.