alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 483 

Commending efforts to promote and enhance public safety on the need for 

yellow corrugated stainless steel tubing bonding. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 6, 2012 

Mr. PRYOR (for himself and Ms. AYOTTE) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Commending efforts to promote and enhance public safety 

on the need for yellow corrugated stainless steel tubing 

bonding. 

Whereas yellow corrugated stainless steel tubing (referred to 

in this preamble as ‘‘CSST’’) is flexible gas piping used 

to convey natural gas or propane to household appliances 

in homes and businesses; 

Whereas since 1990, yellow CSST has been installed in more 

than 6,000,000 homes and businesses in the United 

States; 

Whereas field reports and research suggest that if direct or 

indirect lightning strikes a structure, the risk for electrical arcing between the metal components in a structure 

with yellow CSST may be reduced by means of 

equipotential bonding and grounding; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 483 IS 

Whereas proper bonding of CSST is defined in section 7.13.2 

of the 2009 edition of the NFPA 54: National Fuel Gas 

Code, and is referenced in info note 2 in section 250.104 

of the 2011 edition of the NFPA 70: National Electric 

Code; 

Whereas the National Association of State Fire Marshals 

supports the proper bonding of yellow CSST to current 

National Fire Protection Association Code to reduce the 

possibility of gas leaks and fires from lightning strikes; 

Whereas the National Association of State Fire Marshals is 

working to educate relevant stakeholders, including fire, 

building, and housing officials, consumers, homeowners, 

and construction professionals about the need to properly 

bond yellow CSST in legacy installations and in all new 

installations in accordance with the most recent building 

codes and manufacturer installation instructions; 

Whereas the bonding of yellow CSST in legacy installations 

is an important public safety matter that merits alerting 

homeowners, relevant State and local fire, building, and 

housing officials, and construction professionals such as 

electricians, contractors, plumbers, inspectors, and homeimprovement specialists: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) commends efforts to promote and enhance 

3 public safety and consumer awareness on proper 

4 bonding of yellow corrugated stainless steel tubing 

5 (referred to in this resolution as ‘‘CSST’’) as defined 

6 in the National Fire Protection Association Code; 

7 and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 483 IS 

1 (2) encourages further educational efforts for 

2 the public, relevant building and housing officials, 

3 consumers, homeowners, and construction profes4 sionals on the need to properly bond yellow CSST 

5 retroactively and moving forward in houses that con6 tain the product. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
ENZO LIFE SCIENCES, INC., Petitioner, v. ROCHE MOLECULAR SYSTEMS, INC., et al.

No. 19-1073.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Jeffrey Allen Lindsay,

 

 Appellant,

v.

The Estate of Roy Orey Lindsay, Sr., Roy 

A. Lindsay, Rainey L. Lindsay, Susan 

Lindsay Thomas, Joni K. Lindsay, Roy A. 

("Sonny") Lindsay, and Hanging H. 

Ranch, Inc.,

 Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-18-00212-CV

Appeal from the

143rd District Court

of Reeves County, Texas 

(TC# 13-12-20542 P3137)

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is a joint second motion to abate the appeal. The motion is 

GRANTED, and the appeal is abated until January 1, 2020 to give the parties an opportunity to 

settle the dispute. The appellate timetable will be suspended during the abatement. The parties 

are directed to notify the Court whether the dispute has been resolved and to file the motion 

necessary to dispose of the appeal. See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(a)(1), (2). If the parties are unsuccessful 

in resolving the appeal by agreement, the appeal will be reinstated and the reporter’s record will 

be due 10 days from the date of the reinstatement order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 19th day of July, 2019.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7138

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. DAVID M. KISSI, Defendant - Appellant.

No. 05-7205

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. DAVID M. KISSI, Defendant - Appellant.

No. 05-7212

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. DAVID M. KISSI, Defendant - Appellant.No. 07-4916

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. DAVID M. KISSI, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., DistrictJudge and Joseph R. Goodwin, Chief District Judge. (8:05-cr00254; 8:05-ca-01983)

Submitted: October 31, 2008 Decided: December 9, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

In Nos. 05-7138/7205/7212, David M. Kissi, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Wilkinson, Assistant United States Attorney Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. In No. 07-4916, Donald Kaplan, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Jonathan Biran, Barbara S. Sale, Assistant United States Attorneys, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

23 PER CURIAM: In these consolidated cases, David Kissi appeals from his convictions of bankruptcy fraud, obstruction of justice, and criminal contempt, 18 U.S.C. §§ 157, 401(3), and 1503 (2006). In No. 05-7138, Kissi appeals the district court’s detention order entered in May 2005. In Nos. 05-7205/7212, Kissi appeals from a district court order denying fifteen pending motions. Our review of the record with respect to these appeals discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Kissi , No. 8:05- cr-00254 (D. Md. May 27, 2005; July 26, 2005). Appeal 07-4916 is Kissi’s direct criminal appeal. Kissi’s appellate counsel claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to seek an expert witness to testify regarding Kissi’s mental disorders. To allow for adequate development of the record, a defendant must ordinarily bring a

claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in a 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 2006 and Supp. 2008) motion unless it conclusively appears on the face of the record that counsel provided inadequate assistance. United States v. Richardson , 195 F.3d 192, 198 (4th Cir. 1999). We find that the record does not establish ineffective representation. We have also reviewed the claims raised by Kissi in his supplemental pro se brief and find

them to be without merit.4 Accordingly, we affirm Kissi’s conviction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/24/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       61,023
COMMITMENTS
  15,916   10,936    1,136   30,201   36,385   47,253   48,457   13,770   12,566

CHANGES FROM 12/17/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,106)
     422      271     -396    1,154    1,537    1,180    1,412      -74     -306

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    26.1     17.9      1.9     49.5     59.6     77.4     79.4     22.6     20.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       83)
      23       18       10       35       25       60       51
```

----

Updated December 30, 2013
Juan Ramon Meza SEGUNDO, Petitioner v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-9265

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 10.11

 

	
 
    	
March 30, 2012
    


 

Western National Life Insurance Company

2929 Allen Parkway

Houston, TX 77019

Attention:  Secretary

 

Western National Life Insurance Company

2929 Allen Parkway

Houston, TX 77019

Attention:  General Counsel

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

Reference is made to that certain Unconditional Capital Maintenance Agreement dated as of March 30, 2011 (the “Capital Maintenance Agreement”) by and between American International Group, Inc. and Western National Life Insurance Company (the “Company”).  Capitalized terms, unless otherwise defined herein, shall have the meanings set forth in the Capital Maintenance Agreement.

 

Pursuant to paragraph 3 of the Capital Maintenance Agreement, the undersigned parties hereby agree that effective as of March 30, 2012, the Specified Minimum Percentage shall equal 435%.  Accordingly, Schedule 1 to the Capital Maintenance Agreement shall be restated as follows:

 

“The Specified Minimum Percentage shall equal 435% of the Company’s Company Action Level RBC.”

 











 

	
 
    	
Yours sincerely,
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ David   L. Herzog
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Name:
    	
David L.   Herzog
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Title:
    	
Executive   Vice President and 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Chief   Financial Officer
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Acknowledged   and agreed:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
WESTERN NATIONAL   LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/   Michael J. Akers
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Michael   J. Akers
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    	
Executive   Vice President
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 10 

Supporting the goals and ideals of No Name-Calling Week in bringing attention to name-calling of all kinds and providing schools with the tools 

and inspiration to launch an on-going dialogue about ways to eliminate 

name-calling and bullying in their communities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2013 

Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN (for herself, Mr. KIND, Ms. SPEIER, Mr. SIRES, Mr. 

MORAN, Ms. NORTON, Mr. SABLAN, Mr. POLIS, Mr. CICILLINE, Mr. 

POCAN, Ms. SINEMA, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, and Mr. HONDA) submitted the 

following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Oversight and Government Reform 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of No Name-Calling Week 

in bringing attention to name-calling of all kinds and 

providing schools with the tools and inspiration to launch 

an on-going dialogue about ways to eliminate name-calling and bullying in their communities. 

Whereas No Name-Calling Week is an annual week of educational activities aimed at ending name-calling of all 

kinds and providing schools with the tools and inspiration 

to launch an on-going dialogue about ways to eliminate 

name-calling and bullying in their communities; 

Whereas 60 organizations, including the National School 

Boards Association, National Association of Elementary 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HCON 10 IH 

School Principals, National Association of Secondary 

School Principals, National Education Association, National Association of School Psychologists, Gay, Lesbian 

and Straight Education Network, and Big Brothers Big 

Sisters of America, have come together as No Name-Calling Week partner organizations; 

Whereas thousands of students have participated in No 

Name-Calling Week since its inception in 2004; 

Whereas the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network 

has conducted and released national studies analyzing the 

pervasive harassment and victimization faced by elementary students and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender 

(LGBT) secondary students; 

Whereas 26 percent of elementary students reported hearing 

others say hurtful things based on another student’s race 

or ethnic background; 

Whereas 30 percent of elementary students reported being 

bullied or called names at some point while in school; 

Whereas over 70 percent of LGBT middle and high school 

students frequently hear homophobic remarks and over 

80 percent of LGBT middle and high school students 

were verbally harassed in the past year because of their 

sexual orientation; and 

Whereas 55 percent of LGBT middle and high school students experienced harassment via electronic means in the 

past year: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) supports the goals and ideals of No Name4 Calling Week; and 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with 
3 

•HCON 10 IH 

1 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

2 to observe No Name-Calling Week with appropriate 

3 ceremonies, programs, and activities. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
Binika L. HANKTON, Petitioner v. Frederick BOUTTE, Warden.

No. 18-9678

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       7,852,886
<SECURITIES>                                 3,330,236
<RECEIVABLES>                                  431,137
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,175,110
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,185,492
<PP&E>                                       8,288,493
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,822,215
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,950,565
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,223,107
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       149,001
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,587,663
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,950,565
<SALES>                                        645,438
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               651,650
<CGS>                                          744,940
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  744,940
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,547,126
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             130,930
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,904,128)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,904,128)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,904,128)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               14,505.322


</TABLE>
Rodrigo Cruz PEREZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7638.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Exhibit
32.2





SECTION
906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned,
Robert E. Tomlinson, Chief Financial Officer of Onstream Media Corporation (the
"Company") has executed this certification in connection with the filing with
the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended September 30, 2009 (the "Report").





The
undersigned certifies that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 29th
day of December 2009.





ONSTREAM
      MEDIA CORPORATION/s/
      Robert E. TomlinsonName:
      Robert E. TomlinsonTitle:
      Chief Financial
Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 24.0

           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-04237, 333-04239 and 333-04241) of First
Alert, Inc. of our report dated March 13, 1998, which appears on page F-2  of
this Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997. We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report on the Financial Statement Schedule,
which appears on page 37 of this Form 10-K.

/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP
------------------------
Price Waterhouse LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 20, 1998
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TEXARKANA DIVISION

OPTIMORPHIX, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v. 

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., 

Defendant. 

Civil Action No. 5:23-cv-126-RWS-JBB

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

OPTIMORPHIX, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v. 

AMAZON.COM, INC. AND AMAZON WEB

SERVICES,INC., 

Defendants. 

Civil Action No. 5:23-cv-123-RWS-JBB

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

OPTIMORPHIX, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v. 

CA, INC., 

Defendant. 

Civil Action No. 5:23-cv-134-RWS-JBB

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

OPTIMORPHIX, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v. 

MICROSOFT CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

Civil Action No. 5:23-cv-150-RWS-JBB

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

OPTIMORPHIX, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v. 

F5, INC. 

Defendant. 

Civil Action No. 5:24-cv-26-RWS-JBB

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Case 5:23-cv-00134-RWS-JBB Document 39 Filed 04/29/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 598
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

CAME ON FOR CONSIDERATION, Plaintiff OptiMorphix, Inc. (“OptiMorphix” or 

“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”); Amazon.com, Inc.; Amazon Web 

Services, Inc.; Amazon.com Services LLC (collectively, “Amazon”); CA, Inc. (“CA”); Microsoft 

Corporation (“Microsoft”); and F5, Inc. (“F5”), hereafter Plaintiff and Defendants 

collectively referred to as “the Parties’,” Joint Motion to Continue Scheduling Conference. 

Having considered the motion, it is hereby GRANTED. 

Accordingly, the telephone scheduling conference in these matters shall be 

continued until June 6, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. No later than one week before the scheduling 

conference, the parties shall file a Joint Conference Report as outlined in the April 24, 2024 

Order. 

2

.

____________________________________

J. Boone Baxter

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

SIGNED this the 29th day of April, 2024.

Case 5:23-cv-00134-RWS-JBB Document 39 Filed 04/29/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 599
Letter Agreement between Cancer Genetics, Inc. and John Pappajohn



 Exhibit 10.47 
 May 3, 2012 
 John Pappajohn 
 666 Walnut Street, Ste 2116 
 Des Moines, IA 50309 

 

	Re:	Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Cancer Genetics, Inc. 

 Dear John: 
 This letter agreement will memorialize your agreement with respect to your option to
convert the outstanding principal amount of your loans to he Company pursuant to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (“Credit Agreement”) by and among between JOHN PAPPAJOHN (“Pappajohn”), PECORA AND COMPANY
(“Pecora”) and NNJCA CAPITAL, LLC (“NNJCA”, and with Pappajohn and Pecora, collectively the “Lender”), and CANCER GENETICS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), dated of February 13, 2012 and the
promissory notes (the “Notes”) issued pursuant thereto, to eliminate the conversion feature of the debt effective upon consummation of the Company’s initial public offering and to extend the maturity date to August 15, 2013 for
any principal amount which is not converted. As of the date hereof, the principal amount outstanding under Notes payable to you under the Credit Agreement is $4,000,000. These promises are made to induce us and our underwriters to proceed with the
initial public offering, which is also beneficial to you. 
 You hereby irrevocably agree to exercise your option to convert $2,000,000
principal amount effective upon the consummation of the Company’s initial public offering and that, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Credit Agreement or Notes, the conversion price shall be equal to the initial public offering
price per share. You also agree that, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Credit Agreement or Notes, effective upon the consummation of the initial public offering any conversion rights that you may have had pursuant to the Credit
Agreement and the balance of the Notes shall be eliminated and that the maturity date for the remaining principal amount of $2,000,000 shall be extended to August 15, 2013. 







 In addition, you have confirmed to us that you will take appropriate steps, by reconfirmation of your
guarantee of the Wells Fargo Bank indebtedness or otherwise, to assure that Wells Fargo Bank does not interfere with payment by us of amounts due to DAM Holdings LLC, NNJCA, or Pecora and Company upon consummation of the initial public offering or
otherwise attempt to accelerate the maturity date of our Wells Fargo Bank indebtedness as a result of such payments. 
 Very truly yours, 
 /s/ Panna L. Sharma 

Panna L. Sharma 
 President and CEO 
 Agreed to and Accepted by: 

/s/ John Pappajohn 
 John Pappajohn