alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 96 

Congratulating the Army Dental Corps on its 100th anniversary. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 9, 2011 

Mrs. HUTCHISON (for herself and Mr. CORNYN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the Army Dental Corps on its 100th 

anniversary. 

Whereas, on March 3, 1911, Congress was the first to officially recognize dentistry as a distinct profession by establishing an Army Dental Service with commissioned officers, a seminal event for dentistry as well as for military history; 

Whereas dental health is a critical component of military 

medical readiness; 

Whereas, throughout history, the Army Dental Corps has 

preserved the strength of the Army by minimizing risk 

for and expediting treatment of dental emergencies; 

Whereas the Army Dental Corps works continuously to improve the oral health of soldiers and their families by 

supporting individual and community prevention initiaVerDate Mar 15 2010 22:38 Mar 09, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR96.IS SR96

srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 96 IS 

tives, good oral hygiene practices, and evidence-based 

treatment; 

Whereas the Army Dental Corps endeavors to improve oral 

health world-wide by participating in the full spectrum of 

military and peacekeeping operations, serving as dental 

ambassadors through care rendered to United States and 

coalition military personnel during combat operations, 

and local national citizens in humanitarian operations; 

Whereas the Army Dental Corps, in collaboration with national and international dental organizations, promotes 

synergy among all dental professionals; 

Whereas the Army Dental Corps supports the mission of the 

Federal dental research program, and endorses improved 

dental technologies and therapies through research and 

adherence to sound scientific principles; and 

Whereas the Army Dental Corps recognizes the importance 

of lifelong pursuit of continuing dental education, and 

executes this mission through specialty dental education 

and postgraduate residencies and fellowships for its members: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) congratulates the Army Dental Corps on its 

3 100th anniversary; 

4 (2) commends the Army Dental Corps for its 

5 work to improve the dental readiness of the Army, 

6 and the oral health of soldiers and their families; 

7 (3) recognizes the thousands of dentists who 

8 have served in the Army Dental Corps over the last 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 96 IS 

1 100 years, providing dental care to millions of mem2 bers of the Armed Forces and their families; and 

3 (4) commends the Army Dental Corps for its 

4 efforts to keep America’s soldiers healthy and the 

5 best fighting force in the world. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
# C_2017201EN.01000301.xml

| 24.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/3

---

Adoption of Commission Decision on the notification by Finland of a modified transitional national plan referred to in Article 32(6) of Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions

(2017/C 201/03)

On 8 May 2017, the Commission adopted Decision C(2017) 2908 on the notification by Finland of a modified transitional national plan referred to in Article 32(6) of Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on industrial emissions (1).

1

This document is available on the following internet site: https://circabc.europa.eu/w/browse/36205e98-8e7a-47d7-808d-931bc5baf6ee

---

(1)  OJ L 334, 17.12.2010, p. 17.

1

---
Darru K. HSU, Petitioner, v. UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

No. 19-1013.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, May 25, 2022, 12:00 p.m. to 02:00 p.m., National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 4F52, Rockville, MD 20892, which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on April 15, 2022, FR Doc 2022-08087, 87 FR 22541.                

This notice is being amended to change to the date from May 25, 2022, to June 27, 2022, due to changes in reviewer availability. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: May 27, 2022.

Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-11872 Filed 6-2-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
III 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 19 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 19, 2013 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater 

Washington Soap Box Derby. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR SOAP BOX 

4 DERBY RACES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Greater Washington Soap 

6 Box Derby Association (in this resolution referred to as 

7 the ‘‘sponsor’’) shall be permitted to sponsor a public 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

HCON 19 RDS 

1 event, soap box derby races (in this resolution referred to 

2 as the ‘‘event’’), on the Capitol Grounds. 

3 (b) DATE OF EVENT.—The event shall be held on 

4 June 15, 2013, or on such other date as the Speaker of 

5 the House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules 

6 and Administration of the Senate jointly designate. 

7 SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Under conditions to be prescribed 

9 by the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police 

10 Board, the event shall be— 

11 (1) free of admission charge and open to the 

12 public; and 

13 (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of 

14 Congress. 

15 (b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—The sponsor shall 

16 assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities 

17 incident to all activities associated with the event. 

18 SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS. 

19 Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Cap20 itol, the sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol 

21 Grounds such stage, sound amplification devices, and 

22 other related structures and equipment as may be required 

23 for the event. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

HCON 19 RDS 

1 SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS. 

2 The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police 

3 Board are authorized to make such additional arrange4 ments as may be required to carry out the event. 

5 SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

6 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce7 ment of the restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of 

8 title 40, United States Code, concerning sales, advertise9 ments, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, 

10 as well as other restrictions applicable to the Capitol 

11 Grounds, with respect to the event. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 18, 

2013. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

ERIC GILMORE ET AL.

v.

770 IMPORTS INC. ET AL.

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:23-CV-704-SDJ

NOTICE OF IMPENDING DISMISSAL

The Complaint was filed in this case on August 7, 2023. It appears from the 

records currently before the Court that Defendants 770 Imports Inc.; Cotton Valley 

LLC d/b/a Uni Cot.; Floatie Kings; Imagination Overdrive, Inc.; and Spika Products 

International LTD. have not yet been served. Moreover, the Court’s records indicate

that more than 60 days have passed from the filing of the Complaint. Therefore, this 

notice serves to inform Plaintiff that this action shall be dismissed without 

prejudice as to the listed Defendants after 90 days, in accordance with Federal Rule 

of Civil Procedure 4(m), as amended effective December 1, 2015.

To avoid dismissal as to the listed Defendants pursuant to Rule 4(m), if more 

than 90 days are necessary for service of process, Plaintiff must execute a verified 

petition regarding service of process, advising the Court:

A. That the case should not be dismissed as to the unserved Defendants;

B. That the failure to obtain service upon Defendants is not due to the

fault of the Party seeking to avoid dismissal;

Case 4:23-cv-00704-SDJ Document 9 Filed 10/16/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 36
2

C. The reasons why the case against the unserved Defendants should

not be dismissed, set forth in detail and demonstrating good cause;

and

D. That service will be effected on Defendants within thirty (30) days of

the date of the petition.

This petition must be filed with the Court on or before November 6, 2023. If

the Court is satisfied that the case should not be dismissed as to the unserved 

Defendants, Plaintiff will be so notified. If dismissal of the case as to the unserved 

Defendants is satisfactory to the Plaintiff, no action is required. By executing the 

petition regarding service of process, Plaintiff need not appear in support thereof 

until and/or unless so notified by the Court. Failure to respond will result in 

dismissal as to the unserved Defendants for failure to prosecute.

Case 4:23-cv-00704-SDJ Document 9 Filed 10/16/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 37
Rattan NATH, Petitioner, v. NEW JERSEY

No. 18-1527

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                              62
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,224
<ALLOWANCES>                                       286
<INVENTORY>                                         24
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,351
<PP&E>                                           2,266
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,160
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,735
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,077
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          8
<COMMON>                                           233
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,270
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,735
<SALES>                                          1,477
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,873
<CGS>                                              112
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      112
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,752
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   7
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,996)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,996)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,996)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.10)


</TABLE>
# C_2017331EN.01000402.xml

| 3.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/4

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2017/C 331/06)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 23 August 2017 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 23 August 2017 - 31 December 2017 |
| Member State | Belgium |
| Stock or Group of stocks | MAC/2A34. as well as corresponding special conditions MAC/*02AN-, MAC/*4AN. and MAC/*FRO1 |
| Species | Mackerel (scomber scombrus) |
| Zone | IIIa and IV; Union waters of IIa, IIIb, IIIc and Subdivisions 22-32 |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 16/TQ127 |

Date and time of closure

23 August 2017

Duration

23 August 2017 - 31 December 2017

Member State

Belgium

Stock or Group of stocks

MAC/2A34. as well as corresponding special conditions MAC/*02AN-, MAC/*4AN. and MAC/*FRO1

Species

Mackerel (scomber scombrus)

scomber scombrus

Zone

IIIa and IV; Union waters of IIa, IIIb, IIIc and Subdivisions 22-32

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

16/TQ127

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA '

'

versus ' NO. 1:24-CR-17-MAC

'

CHESTER RAY DAVIS '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Stetson conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued her Findings of Fact and Recommendation 

on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. Judge Stetson recommended that 

the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. She further recommended that the court adjudge 

the Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to Judge Stetson’s findings. The court ORDERS that the 

Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge are 

ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea.

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Chester Ray Davis, is 

adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 

922(g)(1) - Felon in Possession of a Firearm.

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 11th day of July, 2024.

Case 1:24-cr-00017-MAC-ZJH Document 17 Filed 07/11/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 38
Rene A. BOUCHER, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-611.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 20 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.20
                                        Agreed to March 11, 2013        

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and thirteen

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF ROTUNDA FOR CEREMONY TO AWARD CONGRESSIONAL GOLD 
              MEDAL TO PROFESSOR MUHAMMAD YUNUS.

    The rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used on April 17, 
2013, for a ceremony to award the Congressional Gold Medal to Professor 
Muhammad Yunus in recognition of his contributions to the fight against 
global poverty. Physical preparations for the ceremony shall be carried 
out in accordance with such conditions as the Architect of the Capitol 
may prescribe.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
Maria Elena ARAUJO BULEJE, Petitioner, v. William P. BARR, Attorney General.

No. 19-908.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                 1.4084
<CASH>                                             899
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  135,828
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,679
<INVENTORY>                                     82,298
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               222,130
<PP&E>                                          59,479
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,796
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 293,251
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          101,582
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        62,947
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,980
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   293,251
<SALES>                                        761,590
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               761,590
<CGS>                                          611,753
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  122,215
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,469
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,750
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,403
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,084
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,319
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,319
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.20
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 20-1033

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

FRANCIS RAIA,

Appellant

(D.N.J. No. 2-18-cr-00657-001)

Present: SMITH, Chief Judge, AMBRO and CHAGARES, Circuit Judges

1. Unopposed Motion to Amend Opinion

ORDER

The foregoing Unopposed Motion to Amend Opinion is GRANTED as follows: The 

April 2, 2020 precedential opinion in United States v. Raia, No. 20-1033, is VACATED. 

An amended opinion is filed contemporaneously with this order. 

By the Court:

s/ D. Brooks Smith

Chief Circuit Judge 

Dated: April 8, 2020

CJG/cc: Mark E. Coyne, Esq.

Steven G. Sanders, Esq.

Jenny Chung, Esq.

David M. Dugan, Esq.

Lee Vartan, Esq.

Alan L. Zegas, Esq.
Silvester WOODS, Petitioner, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY, et al.

No. 19-7736.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Darren Deon JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. Barbara HOOBER, et al.

No. 18-9496

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 07, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Eastern District of Texas

Case Number: 2:24-CV-00046-JRG-RSP

Plaintiff:

Display Technologies, LLC

vs.

Defendant:

Wondershare Technology Group Co LTD

For:

Garteiser Honea, PLLC

119 W. Ferguson St.

Tyler. TX 75702

Received by Candace Faye Humphreys on the 22nd day of March, 2024 at 5:29 pm to be served on Wondershare

Technology Group Co Ltd by serving through the Texas Secretary of State, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin, Travis

County, TX 78701.

Candace Faye Humphreys, being duiy s\A^orn, depose and say that on the 25th day of March, 2024 at 3:08 pm, 1:

executed to the SECRETARY OF STATE by delivering in dupiicate a true copy of the Summons in a Civil Action and

Complaint with the date of delivery endorsed thereon by me, to: Minerva Barnhart at 1019 Brazos Street, Austin,

Travis County, TX 78701, as the designated agent for the Texas Secretary of State to accept delivery of process on

behalf of Wondershare Technology Group Co Ltd. An administrative fee of $55.00 was also tendered.

certify that am over the age of 18, have no interest in the above action, and am a certified process server, in good

standing, in the judicial circuit in which the foregoing occurred. The facts in this affidavit are within my personal knowledge

and are true and correct.

n

2#" Candace Faye Humphreys

PSC-23879, Exp. 2I2QI2026 n the

by the affiant

Date-£0iJJlpZo2J\

Malone Process Service, LLC

P.O.Box 720040

Dallas, TX 75372

(877) 997-3783

NICaEM.WADE

'^V\ My Notary ID #129086987 ExpiresAugusl9,2024 Our Job Serial Number: ATX-2024003795

Ref: Display Technologies v Wondershare

Copyright © 1992-2024 DreamBuill Software, Inc. - Process Server's Toolbox VS,2m

Case 2:23-cv-00585-JRG-RSP Document 24-2 Filed 05/11/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 863 Case 2:24-cv-00046-JRG-RSP Document 8 Filed 04/04/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 102