alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Eastern District of Texas

COMMUNICATION INTERFACE TECHNOLOGIES 

LLC,

4:23-cv-727

PRIORITY PASS INC.

PRIORITY PASS INC. 

c/o its Registered Agent 

CT Corporation System, 

1999 Bryan Street, Ste 900, Dallas, TX 75201

Trevor Beaty 

BEATY LEGAL PLLC 

514 North Elm Street 

Sherman, Texas 75090 

8/14/23

Case 4:23-cv-00727-SDJ Document 4 Filed 08/14/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 216
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

4:23-cv-727 0.00 Print Save As... Reset

Case 4:23-cv-00727-SDJ Document 4 Filed 08/14/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 217
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                          AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                     57,855
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                               1,947
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                12,042
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           79,621
<PP&E>                                    785,185
<DEPRECIATION>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          1,163,682
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   1,140,700
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                1,670,662
<OTHER-SE>                             (2,222,806)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            1,163,682
<SALES>                                   617,637
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          617,637
<CGS>                                     202,347
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             202,347
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          814,375
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         22,076
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (421,161)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (421,161)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                             (421,161)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.16)
        

</TABLE>
M A N D A T E

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE 166TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on April 29, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise

or reverse your judgment between

In the Int of DMB, Jr and ILB, Appellant

V.

No. 04-14-00767-CV and Tr. Ct. No. 2013-PA-02050

was determined, and therein our said Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we ORDER this

appeal DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

We further ORDER that no costs be assessed against appellant Father

because he is indigent.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of

Texas, with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on September 10, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO

No. 04-14-00767-CV

In the Int of DMB, Jr and ILB

v.

(NO. 2013-PA-02050 IN 166TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

REPORTER'S RECORD

MOTION FEE

FILING

REPORTER'S RECORD

$144.00

$10.00

$195.00

$145.50

INDIGENT

E-PAID

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

BEXAR COUNTY

KARL A BASILE

BEXAR COUNTY

Balance of costs owing to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF

TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of

THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and

payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for

the Fourth District of Texas, this September 10, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
Jermaine Michael JACKSON, Petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 19-7791.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 6, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
condensed consolidated financial statements for the six month period ended June
30, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          10,183
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   95,901
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,031
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               117,366
<PP&E>                                         505,516
<DEPRECIATION>                               (106,513)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 647,736
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          119,437
<BONDS>                                        242,625
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           294
<OTHER-SE>                                     214,359
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   647,736
<SALES>                                        481,362
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               481,362
<CGS>                                          415,722
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,187
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,783
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,016
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,287
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,729
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,729
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .54
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
Exhibit 23.1



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8, No. 333-10017 and 333-58403) pertaining to the ACT Teleconferencing,
Inc. Stock Option Plans of 1991 and 1996, of our report dated February 16, 1999,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of ACT Teleconferencing,
Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31,
1998, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



                                                   ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Denver, Colorado
March 29, 1999

                                    Page 33
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 125 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on any legisla3 tive day from Friday, December 12, 2014, through 

4 Wednesday, December 31, 2014, on a motion offered pur5 suant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader 

6 or his designee, it stand adjourned until 1 p.m. on Friday, 

7 January 2, 2015, or until the time of any reassembly 
2 

•HCON 125 EH 

1 pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, which2 ever occurs first; and that when the House adjourns on 

3 the legislative day of Friday, January 2, 2015, on a mo4 tion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its 

5 Majority Leader or his designee, it stand adjourned sine 

6 die, or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to sec7 tion 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; 

8 and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns on any day 

9 from Friday, December 12, 2014, through Friday, Janu10 ary 2, 2015, on a motion offered pursuant to this concur11 rent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it 

12 stand adjourned sine die, or until the time of any re13 assembly pursuant to section 3 of this concurrent resolu14 tion, whichever occurs first. 

15 SEC. 2. (a) The Speaker or his designee, after con16 sultation with the Minority Leader of the House, shall no17 tify Members of the House to reassemble at such place 

18 and time as he may designate if, in his opinion, the public 

19 interest shall warrant it. 

20 (b) After reassembling pursuant to subsection (a), 

21 when the House adjourns on a motion offered pursuant 

22 to this subsection by its Majority Leader or his designee, 

23 the House shall again stand adjourned pursuant to the 

24 first section of this concurrent resolution. 
3 

•HCON 125 EH 

1 SEC. 3. (a) The Majority Leader of the Senate or his 

2 designee, after concurrence with the Minority Leader of 

3 the Senate, shall notify the Members of the Senate to reas4 semble at such place and time as he may designate if, in 

5 his opinion, the public interest shall warrant it. 

6 (b) After reassembling pursuant to subsection (a), 

7 when the Senate adjourns on a motion offered pursuant 

8 to this subsection by its Majority Leader or his designee, 

9 the Senate shall again stand adjourned pursuant to the 

10 first section of this concurrent resolution. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 12, 

2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 125 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the sine die adjournment of the secgress. ond session of the One Hundred Thirteenth Con-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,373
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,864
<PP&E>                                       1,282,805
<DEPRECIATION>                                  63,325
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,283,037
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,459
<BONDS>                                        379,783
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         88
<COMMON>                                           384
<OTHER-SE>                                     861,623
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,283,037
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                44,584
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,108
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,211
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,147
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,824
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Bessy Argueta Sorto Civil Action No. 4:23-cv-01107

Plaintiff 

v.

Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al

Defendants

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT WITH EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, 

LLC

NOW COMES Plaintiff, files this Notice, and in support would show as follows. 

1. Plaintiff is filing this notice to inform this Court that Plaintiff has settled this 

case with EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC

2. Plaintiff will file the documentation required to terminate Defendant Equifax

and will file a Stipulation of Dismissal once the closing documents are 

exchanged and executed.

Dated: February 26, 2024

Respectfully submitted,

/s/Jonathan Raburn 

Jonathan Raburn

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF 

Louisiana Bar Roll No. 28728

McCarty & Raburn, A Consumer Law Firm, PLLC

8570 Anselmo Ln. 

Baton Rouge, La. 70810 

jraburn@mccartyraburn.com

Telephone: 225-412-2777

Case 4:23-cv-01107-SDJ-KPJ Document 8 Filed 02/26/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 47
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 26th day of February 2024, I electronically filed the foregoing 

with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such 

filing to the attorneys on record:

Date Signed this the 26th day of February 2024

Respectfully submitted,

/s/Jonathan Raburn 

 Jonathan Raburn

 Attorney For Plaintiff

Case 4:23-cv-01107-SDJ-KPJ Document 8 Filed 02/26/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 48
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

J ul y Term 20 14

RANDY L. WASHINGTON
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D14

- 845

[ August 6, 2014 ]

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Jud icial Circuit, Broward County ; Michael A. Usan , Judge; L.T. Case No.

06020920CF10A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach , for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Je anine M. Germanowicz, Assistant Attorney General , for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

The defendant appeals from the circuit court’s order revoking his probation. He argues that the court did not have jurisdiction over him

because his five

- year probation term, im posed in 2008, had expired before the affidavit of violation of probation was filed in 2014. The state properly has confessed error. Based on the foregoing, we reverse and

remand for the ci rcuit court to vacate its order revoking the defendant’s probatio n as an “unsuccessful completion.”

Reverse d and remanded.

T AYLOR

, M AY and G ERBER
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/01/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       80,712
COMMITMENTS
  27,504    3,113    3,769   42,807   71,925   74,080   78,807    6,632    1,905

CHANGES FROM 09/24/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,854)
   1,864      947       37    1,032    2,761    2,933    3,745      921      109

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    34.1      3.9      4.7     53.0     89.1     91.8     97.6      8.2      2.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       87)
      15        4        1       43       41       58       46
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/01/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      248,975
COMMITMENTS
  85,218   27,334    1,967  147,185  214,250  234,370  243,551   14,605    5,424

CHANGES FROM 09/24/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -21,117)
  -4,225  -10,665      679  -13,511   -9,256  -17,057  -19,242   -4,060   -1,875

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    34.2     11.0      0.8     59.1     86.1     94.1     97.8      5.9      2.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      166)
      47       20       11       75       55      126       82
```

----

Updated October 25, 2013
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 17, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-50489 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus VICTOR MARTINEZ-PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:03-CR-753-1-AML

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Victor MartinezPerez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 12.01


                   SMITH BARNEY HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                           (IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT RATIO)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        Six months ended
                                                            June 30,
                                                       ------------------
                                                       1997          1996
                                                       ----          ----

<S>                                                   <C>           <C>   
Earnings before income taxes                          $  787        $  740
                                                      ------        ------

Interest expense                                         926           713

Portion of rentals deemed to be interest                  28            29
                                                      ------        ------

  Total fixed charges                                    954           742
                                                      ------        ------

Earnings before income taxes and fixed charges        $1,741        $1,482
                                                      ======        ======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                     1.82x         2.00x
</TABLE>                                              ======        ======
Saldy MARZAN, Petitioner v. CORECIVIC CORRECTIONAL CENTER, et al.

No. 19-5229

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-41545 (Summary Calendar)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SANTOS RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(B-98-CR-402-04)

-------------------- December 11, 2000 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Defendant-Appellant Santos Rodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (196 7). Rodriguez was notified of counsel’s motion and brief but has not
filed a response to counsel’s motion. Both counsel’s brief and our independent review of the record show that there are no
nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Consequently, counsel’s motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further2

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. S ee 5 TH C IR
. R. 42.2.

S:\OPINIONS\UNPUB\98\98-41545.0 4/29/04 4:51 am