alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ARRIS INTERNATIONAL, LTD., Petitioner, v. Andrei IANCU, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al.

No. 19M28

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted.
Donald Henderson SCOTT, et ux., Petitioners, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, et al.

No. 19-915.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 10(a)



 Exhibit 10(a) 
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 
  







 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Statement of
Additional Information and to the use of our reports: (1) dated April 13, 2012, with respect to the statutory-basis financial statements and schedules of Transamerica Life Insurance Company, and (2) dated April 23, 2012, with respect to the
financial statements of the subaccounts of Separate Account VA HH, included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-173285) under the Securities Act of 1933 and related Prospectus of DWS Personal Pension
Variable Annuity. 
 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP 
 Des Moines, Iowa 
 April 23, 2012
William Francis WALSH, IV, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19M119.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 6, 2020

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal granted.
Nasedra K. LUMPKIN, Petitioner v. Ashley MOODY, Attorney General of Florida, et al.

No. 18-9488

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ZOILA DEL CARMEN DERASROMERO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-72912

Agency No. A099-529-866

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 8, 2011** 

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Zoila Del Carmen Deras-Romero, a native and citizen of El Salvador,

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her

appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum

and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

FILED

MAR 24 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-72912

review for substantial evidence, Ochave v. INS, 254 F.3d 859, 861-62 (9th Cir.

2001), and we deny the petition for review.

We reject Deras-Romero’s contention that she is eligible for asylum based

on her membership in a particular social group, namely young Salvadoran women

who refuse to assist gangs. See Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey, 542 F.3d 738, 745-46

(9th Cir. 2008) (rejecting as a social group “young men in El Salvador resisting

gang violence.”). Further, Deras-Romero did not demonstrate that the gang

members’ threats and other criminal acts against her were motivated by political

opinion, social group, or any other protected ground. See Ochave, 254 F.3d at

865-66 (no nexus between rape by guerillas and any protected ground); see also

Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (“An alien’s desire to be

free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or random violence by gang

members bears no nexus to a protected ground.”).

Because Deras-Romero failed to satisfy the lower standard of proof for

asylum, she necessarily fails to satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding

of removal. See Ochave, 254 F.3d at 868.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,787,636
<SECURITIES>                                 7,091,140
<RECEIVABLES>                               20,436,979
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,375,076
<PP&E>                                     918,784,234
<DEPRECIATION>                           (149,433,938)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             814,041,127
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       49,934,376
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 56,250,000
<COMMON>                                     2,259,695
<OTHER-SE>                                 209,527,466
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               814,041,127
<SALES>                                     95,773,865
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           102,563,611
<CGS>                                       41,104,763
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,914,062
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          20,890,667
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             14,621,253
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         14,621,253
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                124,895
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                14,496,358
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .54
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF A PPEAL S EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEX AS ELPASO, TEXAS CADL EROCK J OI

NT VENT URE I I , L .P., Appellant,
v. BRAKE I SHA TATUM, Appellee
. § § § § § § No. 08-10-00129- CV

Appea l from the 342nd District Court of Tar rant County , Texas (TC# 342-238233-09)
MEMORAN DUM OP INION The parties have filed a joint motion stating they have fully resolved and settled all issues in this dispute. To eff

ectua te their settlement ag ree ment, they ask that we reve rse the trial court’s order g ranting summary judgme nt and rende r an ag ree d judgme nt in favor of Appellant, Cadleroc k J oint Venture I I , L .P., that Appellant rec over $30,974 in actua l damag es from Appellee , Br akeisha Tatum,
an d t hat we order eac h party to pay one-ha lf of the mediator’s fee s. See T E X . R
. A P P . P
. 42.1(a) (2)( A). We g rant the motion. There fore , without ref ere nce to the merits, the judgme nt of the trial court is reve rsed and an ag ree d judgme nt is rende red in favor of Appellant. Fur ther, it is order ed that Appellant recove r $30,974 in actua l damag es from Appellee and that eac h party pay one-ha lf of the media tor’s fe es. As the m otion does not rec ite any ag ree ment as to the costs of this appe al, those costs are taxed ag ainst Appellant. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 42.1(d).

GUADA L UPE RI VERA, J ustice J uly 14, 2010 Be fore Chew, C.J ., McClure, a nd Rivera, JJ
.
EXHIBIT 32

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Theundersigned, Jeffrey I. Friedman, Chairman of the Board and Chief ExecutiveOfficer and Lou Fatica, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofAssociated Estates Realty Corporation (the "Company"), certify,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.         The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for theperiod ended March 31, 2011, which this certification accompanies, fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.
|                                                                                                                                                         |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ Jeffrey I. Friedman                                                                                                                                      |
| Jeffrey I. Friedman                                                                                                                                          |
|                                                               |
|                                                               |
| /s/ Lou Fatica                                                                                                                                               |
| Lou Fatica                                                                                                                                                   |
|                            |
| May 3, 2011                                                                                                                                                  |
| Date                                                                                                                                                         |

A signed original of this written statement has been provided toAssociated Estates Realty Corporation and will be retained by AssociatedEstates Realty Corporation and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 106 (Thursday, June 2, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33475-33476]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11832]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: PR22-44-000.
    Applicants: Louisville Gas and Electric Company.
    Description: Sec.  284.123 Rate Filing: LG&E_Operating Statement 
Rate Change Revised Exhibit A to be effective 5/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 5/25/22.

[[Page 33476]]

    Accession Number: 20220525-5015.
    Comments/Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/15/22.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest in any the above proceedings must 
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18 
CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified 
comment date.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf.
    For other information, call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, 
call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: May 26, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-11832 Filed 6-1-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Charles J. VERNIER, Petitioner v. Debra GALLEGOS.

No. 18-1458

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New Mexico denied.
Jordany PIERRE-PAUL, Petitioner, v. William P. BARR, Attorney General.

No. 19-779.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Anthony THOMAS, Petitioner, v. KENMARK VENTURES, LLC.

No. 19-7073.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Pablo Sauste BALDERAS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5865

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

MWAVUA MSHIMBA,

Petitioner

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 406 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 4th day of December, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

. The Motion to Delay Suspension of Driving Privilege is dismissed as moot.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-4964
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus OLUFUNSHO E. OSHUNLETI, a/k/a F.J., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CR-02-37) Submitted: April 24, 2003 Decided: May 1, 2003 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steven A. Mirman, ST. CLAIR, ST. CLAIR, BRAGG, MIRMAN, SANDWICH AND ROSENBLUM, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, Darryl J. Mitchell, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Olufunsho E. Oshunleti appeals from the judgment of the district court convicting him upon his guilty plea of conspiring to commit bank fraud and uttering forged or counterfeited securities in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 371, 513, 1344 (2000). Oshunleti claims that district court abused its discretion by denying his motion for a continuance made on the morning of trial in order that he be allowed to obtain new counsel. Our review of the record discloses that Oshunleti failed to demonstrate good cause for the continuance. His motion was untimely. Moreover, he failed to demonstrate a conflict so great as to create a total lack of communication between himself and defense counsel. Accordingly, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Oshunleti’s motion for a continuance. See United States v. Mullen , 32 F.3d 891, 895 (4th Cir. 1994). We affirm his convictions and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/09/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      157,478
COMMITMENTS
  35,401   31,352   20,058   83,263   80,119  138,722  131,529   18,756   25,949

CHANGES FROM 04/02/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,111)
  -4,812   -3,119      -73    2,401      910   -2,484   -2,282    1,373    1,171

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    22.5     19.9     12.7     52.9     50.9     88.1     83.5     11.9     16.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      184)
      42       42       41       67       75      130      145
```

----

Updated April 17, 2013
Exhibit 10.5

 

2012-1 AMENDMENT TO HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC.

2000 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

 

Pursuant to the authority granted to the Board of Directors of Helmerich & Payne, Inc. in Section 9.1 of the Helmerich & Payne, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

 

I.

 

Article II of the Plan is hereby amended by adding a Section 2.22 which provides as follows:

 

“2.22      ‘Net-Exercise’ means a procedure by which the Company will reduce the number of shares of Common Stock issued upon exercise by the largest whole number of shares with a Fair Market Value on the date of exercise that does not exceed the aggregate exercise price; provided, however, that the Participant shall pay to the Company any remaining balance of the aggregate exercise price not satisfied by such reduction in the number of whole shares to be issued.”

 

II.

 

Subsection 4.1(iii) of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following sentence:

 

“Shares of Common Stock which are tendered in payment of an Option, withheld as a result of a Net-Exercise, tendered or withheld in payment of taxes or repurchased using Option proceeds, shall not be added back to the shares authorized under Section 1.3.”

 

III.

 

Subsection 6.2(ii) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the first sentence of said Subsection and substituting therefor the following:

 

“The exercise price of an Option may be paid (1) in cash or by check, bank draft or money order payable to the order of the Company; (2) by delivering shares of Common Stock having a Fair Market Value on the date of payment equal to the amount of the exercise price; (3) by delivery of a properly executed notice electing a Net-Exercise; or (4) a combination of the foregoing.”

 

Except as otherwise provided in this Amendment, the Helmerich & Payne, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan is ratified and confirmed in all respects.

 











 

EXECUTED this          day of                             , 2012.

 

	
 
    	
HELMERICH &   PAYNE, INC., a Delaware corporation
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
ATTEST:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
By
    	
 
    
	
Secretary
    	
 
    	
 
    


 

2
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/07/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       51,220
COMMITMENTS
   1,572    7,904    2,036   47,570   41,266   51,178   51,206       42       14

CHANGES FROM 04/30/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -7,814)
    -599     -802     -949   -6,279   -5,919   -7,827   -7,670       13     -144

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     3.1     15.4      4.0     92.9     80.6     99.9    100.0      0.1      0.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       43)
       3       11        5       22       21       28       34`

---

Updated May 10, 2013
Kevin D. MOORE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7189.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 29, 2014

s0721

Order 

Clerk

July 29, 2014

149048

TRAVIS DURANT MAY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 149048

COA: 318338

Jackson CC: 13-002541-AA

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 27, 2014 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                            6846
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    44437
<ALLOWANCES>                                      3820
<INVENTORY>                                      58222
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                127947
<PP&E>                                           52566
<DEPRECIATION>                                   22763
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  186491
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            54199
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           242
<OTHER-SE>                                       88610
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    186491
<SALES>                                         205607
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                205607
<CGS>                                           150611
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   150611
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 81515
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3803
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (30950)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (12248)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (18702)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (18702)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.78)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.78)
        

</TABLE>
Wayne ENGLISH, Petitioner, v. ROADHOUSE HOLDING INC., et al.

No. 19-5109

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.