alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. 

NARCISCO BELLI-VILLEGAS,

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NUMBER 4:23-CR-00283-SDJ

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS

OF FACT AND RECOMMMENDATION ON GUILTY PLEA

The Court referred this matter to the United States Magistrate Judge for administration of 

a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a 

hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court accept

Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment. 

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings. 

Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendation, the Court hereby 

ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States 

Magistrate Judge and accepts Defendant’s guilty plea. It is further ORDERED that, in accordance 

with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the Magistrate Judge’s findings, Defendant Narcisco BelliVillegas is adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment, charging a violation of Title 8 

U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b) - Reentry of a Deported Alien. 

Case 4:23-cr-00283-SDJ-KPJ Document 26 Filed 07/22/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 53
Amendment to Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan



 Exhibit 10(a) 
 AMENDMENT TO LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN 
 Effective February 28,
2012, Section 2.1(l) of the Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan is amended to read in its entirety as follows: 

“Employee” means (i) an individual who is a common law employee (including an officer or director who is also an employee)
of the Company or an Affiliate, and (ii) an individual (a) who is no longer employed by the Company or an Affiliate due to Retirement or otherwise, (b) who is eligible to receive a cash bonus or other cash compensation earned while in
the employment of the Company or an Affiliate, and (c) whose cash bonus or other cash compensation the Committee, in its discretion, determines that all or a portion thereof be paid in the form of an Award under the Plan.
Case 4:23-cv-00613-ALM-KPJ Document 1 Filed 06/01/23 Page 1 of 32 PageID #: 1
Case 4:23-cv-00613-ALM-KPJ Document 1 Filed 06/01/23 Page 2 of 32 PageID #: 2
Case 4:23-cv-00613-ALM-KPJ Document 1 Filed 06/01/23 Page 3 of 32 PageID #: 3
Case 4:23-cv-00613-ALM-KPJ Document 1 Filed 06/01/23 Page 4 of 32 PageID #: 4
Case 4:23-cv-00613-ALM-KPJ Document 1 Filed 06/01/23 Page 5 of 32 PageID #: 5
Case 4:23-cv-00613-ALM-KPJ Document 1 Filed 06/01/23 Page 6 of 32 PageID #: 6
Case 4:23-cv-00613-ALM-KPJ Document 1 Filed 06/01/23 Page 7 of 32 PageID #: 7
Case 4:23-cv-00613-ALM-KPJ Document 1 Filed 06/01/23 Page 8 of 32 PageID #: 8
Case 4:23-cv-00613-ALM-KPJ Document 1 Filed 06/01/23 Page 9 of 32 PageID #: 9
Case 4:23-cv-00613-ALM-KPJ Document 1 Filed 06/01/23 Page 10 of 32 PageID #: 10
Case 4:23-cv-00613-ALM-KPJ Document 1 Filed 06/01/23 Page 11 of 32 PageID #: 11
Case 4:23-cv-00613-ALM-KPJ Document 1 Filed 06/01/23 Page 12 of 32 PageID #: 12
Case 4:23-cv-00613-ALM-KPJ Document 1 Filed 06/01/23 Page 13 of 32 PageID #: 13
Case 4:23-cv-00613-ALM-KPJ Document 1 Filed 06/01/23 Page 14 of 32 PageID #: 14
Case 4:23-cv-00613-ALM-KPJ Document 1 Filed 06/01/23 Page 15 of 32 PageID #: 15
Case 4:23-cv-00613-ALM-KPJ Document 1 Filed 06/01/23 Page 16 of 32 PageID #: 16
Case 4:23-cv-00613-ALM-KPJ Document 1 Filed 06/01/23 Page 17 of 32 PageID #: 17
Case 4:23-cv-00613-ALM-KPJ Document 1 Filed 06/01/23 Page 18 of 32 PageID #: 18
Case 4:23-cv-00613-ALM-KPJ Document 1 Filed 06/01/23 Page 19 of 32 PageID #: 19
Case 4:23-cv-00613-ALM-KPJ Document 1 Filed 06/01/23 Page 20 of 32 PageID #: 20
Case 4:23-cv-00613-ALM-KPJ Document 1 Filed 06/01/23 Page 21 of 32 PageID #: 21
Case 4:23-cv-00613-ALM-KPJ Document 1 Filed 06/01/23 Page 22 of 32 PageID #: 22
Case 4:23-cv-00613-ALM-KPJ Document 1 Filed 06/01/23 Page 23 of 32 PageID #: 23
Case 4:23-cv-00613-ALM-KPJ Document 1 Filed 06/01/23 Page 24 of 32 PageID #: 24
Case 4:23-cv-00613-ALM-KPJ Document 1 Filed 06/01/23 Page 25 of 32 PageID #: 25
Case 4:23-cv-00613-ALM-KPJ Document 1 Filed 06/01/23 Page 26 of 32 PageID #: 26
Case 4:23-cv-00613-ALM-KPJ Document 1 Filed 06/01/23 Page 27 of 32 PageID #: 27
Case 4:23-cv-00613-ALM-KPJ Document 1 Filed 06/01/23 Page 28 of 32 PageID #: 28
Case 4:23-cv-00613-ALM-KPJ Document 1 Filed 06/01/23 Page 29 of 32 PageID #: 29
Case 4:23-cv-00613-ALM-KPJ Document 1 Filed 06/01/23 Page 30 of 32 PageID #: 30
Case 4:23-cv-00613-ALM-KPJ Document 1 Filed 06/01/23 Page 31 of 32 PageID #: 31
Case 4:23-cv-00613-ALM-KPJ Document 1 Filed 06/01/23 Page 32 of 32 PageID #: 32
Robert HERCENBERGER, Petitioner, v. Kathy PROCTOR.

No. 18-9545

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Oregon denied.
EXHIBIT 11.1

                             OWEN HEALTHCARE, INC.

                STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                     (in thousands, except per share data)
                                   UNAUDITED

                                                        YEAR ENDED NOVEMBER 30,
                                                      --------------------------
                                                       1994      1995     1996
                                                      ------   -------   -------
PRIMARY:
 Earnings Applicable to Common Stock ..............   $5,191   $ 8,110   $10,907

  Weighted Average Shares Outstanding .............    9,078    12,196    17,086
  Dilutive Effects of Stock Options ...............      670       954     1,018
                                                      ------   -------   -------
  Common and Common Equivalent Shares .............    9,748    13,150    18,104
                                                      ======   =======   =======

  Earnings Per Common and Common
    Equivalent Share  .............................   $  .53   $   .62   $   .60
                                                      ======   =======   =======

ASSUMING FULL DILUTION:
 Earnings Applicable to Common Stock ..............   $5,191   $ 8,110   $10,907
  Reduction of Convertible Debt Interest
   Expense, Net of Tax and Corporate
   Bonus Effect ...................................      394       270      
                                                      ------   -------   -------
  Earnings Applicable to Common Stock, as adjusted.   $5,585   $ 8,380   $10,907
                                                      ------   -------   -------

  Primary Common and Common Equivalent Shares .....    9,748    13,150    18,104
  Additional Incremental Shares for Options .......       95       260       150
  Weighted Average Shares Issuable Upon
    Conversion of Debt ............................    2,380     1,594      
                                                      ------   -------   -------
  Weighted Average Common and Common Equivalent
   Shares Outstanding, as adjusted ................   12,223    15,004    18,254
                                                      ======   =======   =======
  Earnings Per Common and Common Equivalent Share .   $  .46   $   .56   $   .60
                                                      ======   =======   =======
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 11, 2009 

s0831 

Order 

 

September 11, 2009 

139023 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139023 

 COA: 282451 

Chippewa CC: 06-008336-FH 

THOMAS WESLEY POE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 21, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 22 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 22

  Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony to 
      award the Congressional Gold Medal to Doctor Muhammad Yunus.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 2013

   Mr. Holt submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony to 
      award the Congressional Gold Medal to Doctor Muhammad Yunus.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF ROTUNDA FOR CEREMONY TO AWARD CONGRESSIONAL GOLD 
              MEDAL TO DOCTOR MUHAMMAD YUNUS.

    The rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used on April 17, 
2013, for a ceremony to award the Congressional Gold Medal to Doctor 
Muhammad Yunus in recognition of his contributions to the fight against 
global poverty. Physical preparations for the ceremony shall be carried 
out in accordance with such conditions as the Architect of the Capitol 
may prescribe.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JOSEPH BOND, on behalf of himself and 

others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

FOLSOM INSURANCE AGENCY LLC

Defendant.

Case No. 1:24-CV-00075

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

Kindly enter my appearance as attorney for Plaintiff in the above-captioned matter.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED AND DATED this March 3, 2024.

/s/ Andrew Roman Perrong

Andrew Roman Perrong (E.D. Tex. # 333687PA)

Perrong Law LLC 

2657 Mount Carmel Avenue

Glenside, Pennsylvania 19038

Phone: 215-225-5529 (CALL-LAW) 

Facsimile: 888-329-0305

a@perronglaw.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 1:24-cv-00075-MJT Document 3 Filed 03/03/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 15
Independent Auditors' Report


To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
the Capital Appreciation Fund:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements
of the Capital Appreciation Fund (the Fund) for the year ended
December 31, 2001, we considered its internal control, including
control activities for safeguarding securities, in order to
determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing
our opinion on the financial statements and to comply with the
requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on the
internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Those controls include the safeguarding of assets against
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, error or
fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any
evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to
the risk that it may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in the internal control that might be
material weaknesses under standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness
is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of
the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively
low level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in
amounts that would be material in relation to the financial
statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a
timely period by employees in the normal course of performing
their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters involving
the internal control and its operation, including controls for
safeguarding securities that we consider to be material
weaknesses as defined above as of December 31, 2001.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management, the Board of Trustees of the Fund, and the Securities
and Exchange Commission and is not intended to be and should not
be used by anyone other than these specified parties.



New York, New York
February 8, 2002
**Exhibit 99.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

               In connection with the Quarterly Reportof G & L Realty Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David E. Hamer, Chief Accounting Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

               (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

               (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

|   | /s/ DAVID E. HAMER                                       |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                                          |   |
|   | **David E. Hamer Chief Accounting Officer May 15, 2003** |   |
Antonio HUDSON, Petitioner v. Denise Page HOOD, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, et al.

No. 19-5117

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 99 

Expressing support for designation of a ‘‘National Lao-Hmong Recognition 

Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 21, 2014 

Mr. PERLMUTTER (for himself, Ms. MOORE, Mr. COSTA, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. 

ELLISON, Mr. HONDA, Ms. BORDALLO, Mr. POCAN, Mr. KIND, and Mr. 

DUFFY) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of a ‘‘National LaoHmong Recognition Day’’. 

Whereas the Lao-Hmong, which means ‘‘free people’’, are 

Laotian members of the Hmong tribe and are noted for 

their warrior tradition, loyalty, and bravery; 

Whereas beginning in 1960, the United States recruited 

thousands of the Lao-Hmong to fight against the Communist Pathet Lao and North Vietnamese Army regulars 

in Laos; 

Whereas the United States relied heavily on the Lao-Hmong 

Special Guerrilla Units to engage in direct combat with 

North Vietnamese troops from 1960 to 1975; 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 99 IH 

Whereas the Lao-Hmong conducted tactical guerrilla actions, 

flew thousands of deadly combat missions in support of 

the Armed Forces and the Central Intelligence Agency, 

and fought in conventional and guerrilla combat clashes 

with extreme casualties; 

Whereas the Lao-Hmong, although outnumbered, fought 

against enemy forces to disrupt the flow of troops and 

war supplies along the Ho Chi Minh Trail; 

Whereas the Lao-Hmong protected United States personnel, 

guarded United States Air Force radar installations, 

gathered critical intelligence about enemy operations, and 

undertook rescue missions to save the lives of downed 

United States pilots; 

Whereas more than 35,000 of the Lao-Hmong lost their lives, 

and many more were seriously injured and disabled; 

Whereas thousands of Lao-Hmong suffered grievous injuries 

and permanent disabilities, and thousands more were 

captured and sent to concentration camps; 

Whereas after the conclusion of the war, many Lao-Hmong 

soldiers were the victims of acts of retribution and atrocities by the Pathet Lao, causing many of the Lao-Hmong 

to flee to neighboring Thailand and become refugees; and 

Whereas beginning with the City Council of Golden, Colorado, in 1995, various State and local governments have 

issued proclamations declaring July 22 as ‘‘Lao-Hmong 

Recognition Day’’, and the establishment of a ‘‘National 

Lao-Hmong Recognition Day’’ would recognize the bravery, sacrifice, and loyalty to the United States exhibited 

by the Lao-Hmong in Southeast Asia: Now, therefore, be 

it 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HCON 99 IH 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) expresses support for the designation of 

4 ‘‘National Lao-Hmong Recognition Day’’; and 

5 (2) requests that the President issue a procla6 mation calling upon the people of the United States 

7 to observe ‘‘National Lao-Hmong Recognition Day’’ 

8 with appropriate ceremonies and activities. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 09/23/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      389,039
COMMITMENTS
 122,654  175,029   91,242  152,432   84,639  366,328  350,910   22,711   38,129

CHANGES FROM 09/16/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -24,438)
  -2,909    1,728   -6,854  -16,160  -24,943  -25,923  -30,069    1,485    5,631

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    31.5     45.0     23.5     39.2     21.8     94.2     90.2      5.8      9.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      197)
      59       78       86       39       37      148      165
```

----

Updated September 26, 2014
K. N., et ux., Petitioners, v. MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

No. 19M51

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal granted.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 89 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 89

Relating to the death of Frank W. Buckles, the longest surviving United 
                 States veteran of the First World War.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 3, 2011

   Mr. Rockefeller (for himself, Mr. Burr, Mr. Manchin, Mr. Udall of 
Colorado, Mr. Begich, Mrs. McCaskill, Mr. Menendez, Mr. Brown of Ohio, 
    Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Nelson of Florida, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Wyden, Ms. 
  Landrieu, Mr. Brown of Massachusetts, Mr. McCain, and Mr. Bingaman) 
 submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Relating to the death of Frank W. Buckles, the longest surviving United 
                 States veteran of the First World War.

Whereas Frank Woodruff Buckles is the last known American World War I veteran, 
        who passed away on February 27, 2011, at the age of 110, and represents 
        his generation of veterans;
Whereas America's support of Great Britain, France, Belgium, and its other 
        allies in World War I marked the first time in the Nation's history that 
        American soldiers went abroad in defense of liberty against foreign 
        aggression, and it marked the true beginning of the ``American 
        century'';
Whereas more than 4,000,000 men and women from the United States served in 
        uniform during World War I, among them 2 future presidents, Harry S. 
        Truman and Dwight D. Eisenhower;
Whereas 2,000,000 individuals from the United States served overseas during 
        World War I, including 200,000 naval personnel who served on the seas;
Whereas the United States suffered 375,000 casualties during World War I, 
        including 116,516 deaths;
Whereas the events of 1914 through 1918 shaped the world, the United States, and 
        the lives of millions of people in countless ways; and
Whereas Frank Woodruff Buckles is the last veteran to represent the 
        extraordinary legacy of the World War I veterans: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That--
            (1) the Senate recognizes the historic contributions of all 
        United States veterans who served in the First World War; and
            (2) when the Senate adjourns today, it stand adjourned as a 
        further mark of respect to the memory of Frank W. Buckles, the 
        longest surviving United States veteran of the First World War.
    Sec. 2.  The Secretary of the Senate is directed to transmit an 
enrolled copy of this resolution to the family of the deceased.
                                 <all>
```
BLACKBIRD TECH LLC, dba Blackbird Technologies, Petitioner, v. HEALTH IN MOTION LLC, dba Inspire Fitness, et al.

No. 19-1132.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE – Page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

VIRTAMOVE CORP.,

Plaintiff,

v.

HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE

COMPANY, 

Defendant.

Civil Action No. 2:24-cv-093-JRG

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

Please take notice that Jennifer H. Doan of the law firm HALTOM & DOAN enters her

appearance as counsel of record for Defendant Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (“HPE”) and 

requests that any correspondence, motions, notices, and pleadings in this action directed to HPE

also be served upon Jennifer H. Doan at the following address: 

Jennifer H. Doan

HALTOM & DOAN

6500 Summerhill Road, Suite 100

Texarkana, TX 75503

Telephone: (903) 255-1000

Facsimile: (903) 255-0800

Email: jdoan@haltomdoan.com

Please add the name of Mrs. Doan to all service lists in this matter, including the e-filing 

service list.

Case 2:24-cv-00093-JRG Document 13 Filed 02/21/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 96
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE – Page 2

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Jennifer H. Doan

Jennifer H. Doan

Texas Bar No. 08809050

HALTOM & DOAN

6500 Summerhill Road, Suite 100

Texarkana, TX 75503

Telephone: (903) 255-1000

Facsimile: (903) 255-0800

Email: jdoan@haltomdoan.com

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT

HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE 

COMPANY 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document 

has been served via the Court’s ECF system on February 21, 2024.

/s/ Jennifer H. Doan

Jennifer H. Doan

Case 2:24-cv-00093-JRG Document 13 Filed 02/21/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 97
Josephine BANKS, Petitioner, v. WAFFLE HOUSE, INC.

No. 19-7888.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.