alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.1
             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

      As  independent  certified  public  accountants,  we hereby consent to the
incorporation  by  reference in the  following  registration  statements  of our
report dated January 12, 2006 included in Onstream  Media's  Corporation's  Form
10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2005.

      * Registration statement on Form S-8, SEC file number 333-63822,  as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 25, 2001,

      *  Registration  statement  on Form S-3,  SEC file  number  333-63792,  as
declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 2, 2001,

      * Registration statement on Form S-8, SEC file number 333-64588,  as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 3, 2001,

      *  Registration  statement  on Form S-3,  SEC file  number  333-71308,  as
declared  effective by the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on November 14,
2001,

      *  Registration  statement  on Form S-3,  SEC file  number  333-89042,  as
declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 7, 2002,

      *  Registration  statement  on Form S-3,  SEC file  number  333-18819,  as
declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 30, 2002,

      *  Registration  statement  on Form S-3,  SEC file  number  333-92064,  as
declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 21, 2002,

      *  Registration  statement  on Form S-3,  SEC file number  333-104588,  as
declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 2, 2003,

      *  Registration  statement  on Form S-3,  SEC file number  333-106516,  as
declared  effective by the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on September 2,
2003,

      *  Registration  statement  on Form S-3,  SEC file number  333-110142,  as
declared  effective by the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on November 12,
2003, and

      *  Registration  statement  on Form S-3,  SEC file number  333-124002,  as
declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 29, 2005.


/s/ GOLDSTEIN LEWIN & CO.

GOLDSTEIN LEWIN & CO.

Boca Raton, Florida,
January 12, 2006
DM2\18945019.1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

AT&T SERVICES INC.; AT&T MOBILITY 

LLC; and AT&T CORP., 

 Defendants, 

ERICSSON INC., 

Intervenor.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00468-JRG-RSP 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC., AND 

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON 

WIRELESS, 

 Defendants, 

ERICSSON INC., 

Intervenor. 

Case No. 2:23-cv-00470-JRG-RSP 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

T-MOBILE USA, INC., 

 Defendant, 

ERICSSON INC., 

Intervenor. 

Case No. 2:23-cv-00469-JRG-RSP 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Case 2:23-cv-00468-JRG-RSP Document 22-4 Filed 12/12/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 797
 2 

DM2\18945019.1 

ORDER GRANTING ERICSSON’S MOTION TO INTERVENE 

Before the Court is Intervenor Ericsson Inc.’s (“Ericsson”) Motion to Intervene (the 

“Motion”). Ericsson moved to intervene pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a) or, in 

the alternative, pursuant to Rule 24(b). Having considered the Motion, and the relevant authorities, 

the Court finds that the Motion should be and hereby is GRANTED. Accordingly, Ericsson is 

permitted to intervene in these actions and is GRANTED LEAVE to file a responsive pleading in 

intervention within forty-eight (48) hours of entry of this Order. 

Case 2:23-cv-00468-JRG-RSP Document 22-4 Filed 12/12/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 798
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Filed: January 13, 2023

No. 20-5183

LISA GUFFEY AND CHRISTINE SMITH,

APPELLEES

v.

ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS

DIRECTOR OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED

STATES COURTS,

APPELLANT

Consolidated with 20-5208

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia

(No. 1:18-cv-01271)

On Petition for Rehearing En Banc

Before: SRINIVASAN, Chief Judge; HENDERSON**, MILLETT,

PILLARD*,WILKINS,KATSAS,RAO,WALKER, CHILDS, and PAN,

Circuit Judges
2

O R D E R

Appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc and the

response thereto were circulated to the full court, and a vote

was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges eligible to

participate did not vote in favor of the petition. Upon

consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the petition be denied.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk

BY: /s/

Daniel J. Reidy

Deputy Clerk

* Circuit Judge Pillard did not participate in this matter.

** Circuit Judge Henderson would grant the petition for

rehearing en banc. A statement by Circuit Judge Henderson,

dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc, is attached.
KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge, dissenting 

from the denial of rehearing en banc: For the reasons explained 

in my panel dissent, which is hereby incorporated by reference 

thereto, Guffey v. Mauskopf, 45 F.4th 442, 452–62 (D.C. Cir. 

2022) (Henderson, J., dissenting), I dissent from the denial of 

rehearing en banc.
Ahmad Jamaleddin ALJINDI, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 19-7708.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 6, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Zacharias Abab AGUEDO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7945.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
James Anderson DELLINGER, Petitioner, v. TENNESSEE.

No. 19-8011.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, Eastern Division denied.
.•> **

A)ajtLS_i%^3o^t

—/jzioa& C^*m{ , dl CsiLvhsjuk Hpp&0&'

b>e<tvi C4zsif(i

2%Mttf£s_

^MAWLaT CuU/iJU^ &fl JcAy; p/<?jCUfis

^^^^!^^^^aH^a

flsdflbtj£<l&55 SfUOAseft

ftrntuUlUTiL-Tlfirt

IS^L^^^pqXo/ll*u3 ^u4ccj^ &jftfi*s sxddsyu^ cA^ji^J^

{jfyMsnASAjUL^Llum 1*1 {#1^ %-fl/JL (&C&u4^

RECEiVFD IM

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

JAN 07 2015

^belAcosta^Clerk-
<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MediaNews Group, Inc. (the
"Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William Dean
Singleton, Vice Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                      /s/ WILLIAM DEAN SINGLETON
                                          --------------------------
                                          William Dean Singleton,
                                          Vice Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
                                          and Director
                                          September 27, 2004
Syed K. RAFI, petitioner, v. BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL, et al.

No. 18-6166.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,418
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  154,205
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,937
<INVENTORY>                                    275,811
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               421,572
<PP&E>                                         316,967
<DEPRECIATION>                                  58,846
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 768,887
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          209,153
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           221
<OTHER-SE>                                     459,401
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   768,887
<SALES>                                      1,163,189
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,163,189
<CGS>                                        1,090,032
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,110,025
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                11,604
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 775
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,061
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,705
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23,392
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,392
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.06
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: August 9, 2007
    By
    /s/ J. Reid PorterJ. Reid PorterExecutive Vice President and
      Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 4

REDACTED IN ITS 

ENTIRETY

To Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to 

Dismiss Complaint

Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 50-5 Filed 08/06/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 747
Steven Dwayne BROWN, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA; and Steven Dwayne Brown, petitioner, v. California.

No. 17-8972.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00486-CV

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF AGING 

AND DISABILITY SERVICES AND 

DENTON STATE SUPPORTED 

LIVING CENTER

APPELLANTS

V.

FARHAT CHISHTY, AS NEXT 

FRIEND OF HASEEB CHISHTY

APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 158TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered the parties’ “Agreed Motion To Dismiss.” It is the 

court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the 

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

PANEL: MCCOY, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ. 

DELIVERED: July 19, 2012
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6160

In Re: BILLY JOE PELFREY, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-99-693-3) Submitted: March 22, 2001 Decided: March 30, 2001 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Billy Joe Pelfrey, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Billy Joe Pelfrey has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus from this court seeking to have this court order the district court handling his case to transfer his case to another district court, to restore the filing time for all discovery, to seize variousrecords from the Defendants in his civil action, to order an investigation as to why Defendants do not have certain records, and to make the results of such investigation known to him. Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). Mandamus relief is only available when there are no other means by which the relief sought could be granted, In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987), and may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re Catawba Indian Tribe , 973 F.2d 1133, 1135 (4th Cir. 1992). The party seeking mandamus relief carries the heavy burden of showing that he has no other adequate means to attain the relief he desires and that his entitlement to such relief is clear and indisputable. Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc. , 449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980). Pelfrey has not made that showing. Accordingly, we deny mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          42,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  679,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    978,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,871,700
<PP&E>                                      16,913,500
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,653,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,923,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,502,400
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    227,600
<COMMON>                                    12,413,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  (2,498,800)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,923,200
<SALES>                                      6,529,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,918,800
<CGS>                                        4,908,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,992,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (8,500)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             636,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,701,100)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (1,138,800)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,562,300)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,562,300)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.35)
        

</TABLE>
Parnell MAY, Petitioner, v. ARKANSAS.

No. 19-7383.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arkansas denied.
Allan WIDDIFIELD, Petitioner, v. Kevin MAZZA, Warden.

No. 19-8122.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.2 — Certification of Chief Financial Officer — Sarbanes-Oxley Section 906**Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. section 1350, the undersigned officer of Triad Guaranty Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 andthe information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.Date: May 9, 2006         By:                               /s/ Kenneth W. Jones    Kenneth W. Jones    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   The signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
# C_2017436EN.01000502.xml

| 16.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 436/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 436/5

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2017/C 436/08)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 7.11.2017 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 7.11.2017-31.12.2017 |
| Member State | Portugal |
| Stock or Group of stocks | ALF/3X14- |
| Species | Alfonsinos (Beryx spp.) |
| Zone | Union and international waters of III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, X, XII and XIV |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 39/TQ2285 |

Date and time of closure

7.11.2017

Duration

7.11.2017-31.12.2017

Member State

Portugal

Stock or Group of stocks

ALF/3X14-

Species

Alfonsinos (Beryx spp.)

Beryx

Zone

Union and international waters of III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, X, XII and XIV

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

39/TQ2285

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
Derrick WASHINGTON, Petitioner, v. Carol A. MICI, Commissioner, Massachusetts Department of Correction.

No. 19-5060.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/16/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       39,443
COMMITMENTS
   4,133    4,202    2,008   21,053   22,742   27,193   28,951   12,250   10,492

CHANGES FROM 04/09/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -2,276)
     232     -467     -141   -2,834   -2,562   -2,743   -3,170      466      893

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    10.5     10.7      5.1     53.4     57.7     68.9     73.4     31.1     26.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       55)
       9       12        8       27       22       40       39
```

----

Updated April 19, 2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of operations
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such consolidated financial
statements together with the related footnotes thereto.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                            3238
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      495
<ALLOWANCES>                                        57
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  7523
<PP&E>                                           27763
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2501
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   32785
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             6068
<BONDS>                                          37033
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (12649)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     32785
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  3995
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     4567
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1973
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2489)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2489)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2489)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES, EX REL. Andrew GELBMAN, petitioner, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, et al.

No. 19-892

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.