Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2022 / Notices 33713 

1See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, 

Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, from the 

People’s Republic of China: Final Results of 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Review and 

Recession of Review, in Part; 2016, 84 FR 45125 

(August 28, 2019) (Final Results), and 

accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum, 

as amended by Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic 

Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, 

From the People’s Republic of China: Amended 

Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Review; 2016, 84 FR 68102 (December 13, 2019) 

(Amended Final Results). 2See Canadian Solar Inc. v. United States, 537 F. 

Supp. 3d 1380 (CIT 2021). 3 Id. 

4See Canadian Solar Inc. v. United States, CIT 

Consolidated Court No. 19–00178, ‘‘Final Results of 

Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand,’’ dated 

December 13, 2021 (Remand Redetermination). 

5See Canadian Solar Inc., et al. v. United States, 

Slip Op. 22–49 (CIT May 19, 2022). 

6 Id. 

7 Id. 

8See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 

(Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken). 

9See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. 

United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010). 

10See Remand Redetermination at 56. 

Dated: May 25, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2022–11880 Filed 6–2–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–980] 

Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, 

Whether or Not Assembled Into 

Modules, From the People’s Republic 

of China: Notice of Court Decision Not 

in Harmony With Final Results of 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Review and Notice of Amended Final 

Results 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On May 19, 2022, the U.S. 

Court of International Trade (the Court) 

entered judgment sustaining the final 

results of remand redetermination 

pursuant to court order by the U.S. 

Department of Commerce (Commerce) 

pertaining to the 2016 countervailing 

duty (CVD) administrative review of the 

order on crystalline silicon photovoltaic 

cells, whether or not assembled into 

modules (solar cells) from the People’s 

Republic of China (China). Commerce is 

notifying the public that the final 

judgment in this case is not in harmony 

with Commerce’s final results in the 

2016 administrative review of solar cells 

from China and that Commerce is 

amending the final results. 

DATES: Applicable May 29, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Gene H. Calvert, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–3586. 

SUPPLEMTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 28, 2019, Commerce 

published its final results of the 2016 

administrative review of solar cells from 

China.1 Commerce reached affirmative 

determinations for mandatory 

respondents Canadian Solar Inc. and its 

cross-owned affiliates (collectively, 

Canadian Solar) and Jinko Solar Import 

and Export Co., Ltd. and its cross-owned 

affiliates (collectively, Jinko Solar), as 

well as for numerous other producers 

and exporters not selected for 

individual review. 

On September 3, 2021, the Court 

remanded aspects of the Final Results to 

Commerce for further consideration.2

The Court remanded Commerce’s 

determinations regarding Commerce’s 

calculation of the benchmark for 

aluminum extrusions; the determination 

of the benchmark for solar grade 

polysilicon; the use of adverse facts 

available (AFA) in its specificity finding 

for the provision of electricity for less 

than adequate remuneration (LTAR); the 

determination not to grant an entered 

value adjustment (EVA); and the 

determination regarding the Export 

Buyer’s Credit Program.3

In its remand redetermination, issued 

in December 2021,4 Commerce provided 

additional explanation and evidence for 

its determinations and revised certain 

determinations consistent with the 

Court’s remand order, and the Court 

sustained Commerce’s remand 

redetermination in full.5 Specifically, 

the Court found that Commerce’s 

determination to solely rely on data 

from IHS to establish a benchmark for 

aluminum extrusions, its determination 

that AFA was warranted regarding its 

specificity determination for the 

provision of electricity for LTAR 

because the Government of China (GOC) 

did not provide requested information, 

and that Commerce’s explanation that 

China’s solar-grade polysilicon market 

is distorted due to significant 

government participation by the GOC, 

all complied with the Court’s order.6

The Court also found that the granting 

of the EVA and removal of the subsidy 

rate for the Export Buyer’s Credit 

Program satisfied the options as 

provided by the Court.7

Timken Notice 

In its decision in Timken,8 as clarified 

by Diamon Sawblades,9 the U.S. Court 

of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held 

that, pursuant to section 516A(c) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

Commerce must publish a notice of 

court decision that is not ‘‘in harmony’’ 

with a Commerce determination and 

must suspend liquidation of entries 

pending a ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. 

The Court’s May 19, 2020 judgment 

constitutes a final decision of the Court 

that is not in harmony with Commerce’s 

Final Results and Amended Final 

Results. This notice is published in 

fulfillment of the publication 

requirements of Timken. Accordingly, 

Commerce will continue suspension of 

liquidation of subject merchandise 

pending expiration of the period of 

appeal or, if appealed, pending a final 

and conclusive court decision. 

Amended Final Results 

Because there is now a final court 

decision, Commerce is amending the 

Amended Final Results with respect to 

Canadian Solar, Jinko Solar, and for all 

other producers and exporters subject to 

this review. The revised total net 

countervailable subsidy rates for 

Canadian Solar and Jinko Solar for the 

period January 1, 2016, through 

December 31, 2016, are as follows: 10

Producer/exporter Subsidy rate 

(percent ad valorem) 

Canadian Solar Inc. and Cross-Owned Affiliates 11 ............................................................................................................ 3.65 

Jinko Solar Import and Export Co., Ltd. and Cross-Owned Affiliates 12 ............................................................................. 5.86 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
33714 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2022 / Notices 

11Cross-owned affiliates are: Canadian Solar Inc.; 

Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Luoyang) Inc.; 

Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Changshu) Inc.; CSI 

Cells Co., Ltd.; CSI Solar Power (China) Inc. (name 

was changed to CSI Solar Power Group Co., Ltd. in 

December 2016); CSI Solartronics (Changshu) Co., 

Ltd.; CSI Solar Technologies Inc.; CSI New Energy 

Holding Co., Ltd. (name was CSI Solar Manufacture 

Inc. until July 2015); CSI–GCL Solar Manufacturing 

(Yancheng) Co., Ltd.; Changshu Tegu New Materials 

Technology Co., Ltd.; Changshu Tlian Co., Ltd.; and 

Suzhou Sanysolar Materials Technology Co., Ltd. 

12Cross-owned affiliates are: Jinko Solar Import 

and Export Co., Ltd.; Jinko Solar Co., Ltd.; Zhejiang 

Jinko Solar Co., Ltd.; Jinko Solar (Shanghai) 

Management Co., Ltd.; Jiangxi Jinko Photovoltaic 

Materials Co., Ltd.; and Xinjiang Jinko Solar Co., 

Ltd. 

Review-Specific Rate Applicable to 

the Non-Selected Companies Subject to 

this Review: 

Producer/exporter Subsidy rate 

(percent ad valorem) 

Baoding Jiasheng Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................... 5.17 

Baoding Tianwei Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd ................................................................................................... 5.17 

Beijing Tianneng Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd ................................................................................................... 5.17 

Canadian Solar (USA) Inc ................................................................................................................................................... 5.17 

Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................. 5.17 

Changzhou Trina Solar Yabang Energy Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................... 5.17 

Chint Solar (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................ 5.17 

Dongguan Sunworth Solar Energy Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................ 5.17 

ERA Solar Co. Limited ........................................................................................................................................................ 5.17 

ET Solar Energy Limited ..................................................................................................................................................... 5.17 

Hainan Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................. 5.17 

Hangzhou Sunny Energy Science and Technology Co., Ltd .............................................................................................. 5.17 

Hengdian Group DMEGC Magnetics Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................... 5.17 

Hengshui Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd .............................................................................................................. 5.17 

JA Solar Technology Yangzhou Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................ 5.17 

JA Technology Yangzhou Co., Ltd ...................................................................................................................................... 5.17 

Jiangsu High Hope Int’l Group ............................................................................................................................................ 5.17 

Jiawei Solarchina (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................... 5.17 

Jiawei Solarchina Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................................... 5.17 

JingAo Solar Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................................................................... 5.17 

Jinko Solar (U.S.) Inc .......................................................................................................................................................... 5.17 

Jinko Solar International Limited ......................................................................................................................................... 5.17 

Lightway Green New Energy Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................. 5.17 

Lixian Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................... 5.17 

Luoyang Suntech Power Co., Ltd ....................................................................................................................................... 5.17 

Nice Sun PV Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................................................................... 5.17 

Ningbo Qixin Solar Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................ 5.17 

Risen Energy Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................................................................... 5.17 

Shanghai BYD Co., Ltd ....................................................................................................................................................... 5.17 

Shanghai JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................. 5.17 

Shenzhen Glory Industries Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................................... 5.17 

Shenzhen Topray Solar Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................................................... 5.17 

Sumec Hardware & Tools Co., Ltd ..................................................................................................................................... 5.17 

Systemes Versilis, Inc ......................................................................................................................................................... 5.17 

Taizhou BD Trade Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................................. 5.17 

tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................. 5.17 

Tianjin Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................... 5.17 

Toenergy Technology Hangzhou Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................................... 5.17 

Trina Solar (Changzhou) Science & Technology Co., Ltd .................................................................................................. 5.17 

Wuxi Suntech Power Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................. 5.17 

Yancheng Trina Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................... 5.17 

Yingli Energy (China) Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................. 5.17 

Yingli Green Energy Holding Company Limited .................................................................................................................. 5.17 

Yingli Green Energy International Trading Company Limited ............................................................................................. 5.17 

Zhejiang Era Solar Technology Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................. 5.17 

Zhejiang Sunflower Light Energy Science & Technology Limited Liability Company ........................................................ 5.17 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2022 / Notices 33715 

1See Hyundai RB Co., Ltd.’s Letter, ‘‘Request for 

Administrative Review,’’ dated May 28, 2021; see 

also SeAH Steel Corporation’s Letter, ‘‘Request for 

Administrative Review,’’ dated June 1, 2021; 

Hyundai Steel’s Letter, ‘‘Request for Administrative 

Review,’’ dated June 1, 2021; Domestic Interested 

Party’s Letter, ‘‘Request for Administrative 

Review,’’ dated June 1, 2021; and Hyundai Steel 

Company’s and Husteel Co., Ltd.’s Letter, ‘‘Request 

for Administrative Review,’’ dated June 3, 2021. 

The domestic interested party is The American Line 

Pipe Producers Association Trade Committee. 

2See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from the 

Republic of Korea: Countervailing Duty Order, 84 

FR 18773 (May 2, 2019) (Order). 

3See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 

35481 (July 6, 2021) (Initiation Notice). 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Respondent Selection,’’ 

dated July 29, 2021. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review; 2020,’’ dated January 4, 

2022. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of 

the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 

2020: Large Diameter Welded Pipe from the 

Republic of Korea,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum). 

7See Domestic Interested Party’s Letter, ‘‘Partial 

Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,’’ 

dated October 4, 2021. 

8As stated in the Initiation Notice, subject 

merchandise both produced and exported by 

Husteel Co., Ltd. (Husteel) is excluded from the 

CVD order. Thus, Husteel’s inclusion in this 

administrative review is limited to entries for which 

Husteel was the producer or exporter of the subject 

merchandise, but not both the producer and 

exporter. 

9As stated in the Initiation Notice, subject 

merchandise both produced and exported by 

Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai Steel) and 

subject merchandise produced by Hyundai Steel 

and exported by Hyundai Corporation are excluded 

from the CVD order. Thus, Hyundai Steel’s 

inclusion in this administrative review is limited to 

entries for which Hyundai Steel was not the 

producer and exporter of the subject merchandise 

and for which Hyundai Steel was not the producer 

and Hyundai Corporation was not the exporter of 

subject merchandise. 

10See Memorandum, ‘‘Notice of Intent to Rescind 

Review, In Part,’’ dated February 11, 2022. 

11See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act 

regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) 

Continued 

Amended Cash Deposit Rates 

Commerce will issue revised cash 

deposit instructions to U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection for all firms 

above that do not have a superseding 

cash deposit rate (e.g., from a 

subsequent administrative review). For 

such firms, the revised cash deposit 

rates will be the rates indicated above, 

effective May 29, 2022. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 516A(e)(1), 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: May 27, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2022–11938 Filed 6–2–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–580–898] 

Large Diameter Welded Pipe From the 

Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results 

and Partial Rescission of the 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Review; 2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 

determines that countervailable 

subsidies are being provided to 

producers and exporters of large 

diameter welded pipe (welded pipe) 

from the Republic of Korea (Korea). The 

period of review (POR) is January 1, 

2020, through December 31, 2020. 

DATES: Applicable June 3, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Dennis McClure or Jonathan Schueler, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office VIII, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5973 or 

(202) 482–9175, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

BACKGROUND

On May 28, and June 1 and 3, 2021, 

we received multiple requests for an 

administrative review 1 of the 

countervailing duty (CVD) order on 

welded pipe from Korea.2 On July 6, 

2021, Commerce published a notice of 

initiation of an administrative review of 

the Order.3 On July 29, 2021, Commerce 

selected Hyundai RB Co., Ltd. (Hyundai 

RB) and SeAH Steel Corporation (SeAH 

Steel) as the mandatory respondents in 

this administrative review.4 On January 

4, 2022, Commerce extended the 

deadline for the preliminary results of 

this review to no later than May 31, 

2022.5

For a complete description of the 

events that followed the initiation of 

this review, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum.6 A list of topics 

discussed in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is included at the 

appendix to this notice. The Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the 

Order is welded pipe. For a complete 

description of the scope of the Order, 

see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

Final Rescission of Administrative 

Review 

As noted in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum, the domestic interested 

party timely withdrew their requests for 

administrative review with respect to 

EM Solution Co., Ltd.; Hansol Metal Co., 

Ltd.; Hawin; Hyosung; and POSCO.7 No 

other parties requested a review of these 

companies. On February 23, 2022, 

Commerce notified interested parties 

that we intended to rescind this 

administrative review of the companies 

named above and the following 

companies in the absence of suspended 

entries during the POR: (1) AJU Besteel 

Co., Ltd.; (2) Daiduck Piping Co., Ltd.; 

(3) Dongbu Incheon Steel Co., Ltd.; (4) 

EEW KHPC Co., Ltd.; (5) Husteel Co., 

Ltd.; 8 (6) Hyundai Steel; (7) Hyundai 

Steel Co., Ltd.; (8) Hyundai Steel 

Company; 9 (9) Kiduck Industries Co., 

Ltd.; (10) Kum Kang Kind. Co., Ltd.; (11) 

Kumsoo Connecting Co., Ltd.; (12) 

Nexteel Co., Ltd.; (13) Samkang M&T 

Co., Ltd.; (14) SeAH Steel, Co., Ltd.; (15) 

Seonghwa Industrial Co., Ltd.; (16) SIN– 

E B&P Co., Ltd.; (17) Steel Flower Co., 

Ltd.; and (18) WELTECH Co., Ltd.10 No 

parties commented on the notification 

of intent to rescind the review of the 23 

companies named above. Therefore, we 

determine that there were no entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR by 

these companies. As a result, we are 

rescinding this review, in part, pursuant 

to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1) and 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(3) with respect to the 23 

companies listed above. 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(l)(A) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act). For each of the subsidy 

programs found countervailable, we 

preliminarily determine that there is a 

subsidy, i.e., a government-provided 

financial contribution that confers a 

benefit to the recipient, and that the 

subsidy is specific.11 For a full 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES