alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MEDIANEWS
GROUP INC'S FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K.MEDIANEWS GROUP, INC. WAS
FORMERLY KNOWN AS GARDEN STATE NEWSPAPERS INC.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         144,632
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  103,429
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,910
<INVENTORY>                                     19,708
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               279,129
<PP&E>                                         521,783
<DEPRECIATION>                                 157,011
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,138,892
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          129,712
<BONDS>                                        811,659
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                2
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         939
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,138,892
<SALES>                                        947,301
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               947,301
<CGS>                                          320,095
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  825,190
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,387
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              75,758
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                124,976
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,407
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            130,383
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   130,383
<EPS-BASIC>                                      56.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    56.40


</TABLE>
Donald W. RAGER, Petitioner, v. Paige AUGUSTINE, Warden, et al.

No. 19-6410.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 6, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 07/09/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       35,393
COMMITMENTS
   4,136    5,103      803   20,674   19,223   25,613   25,128    9,780   10,264

CHANGES FROM 07/02/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        727)
      20      691      -12      345     -258      353      420      374      307

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    11.7     14.4      2.3     58.4     54.3     72.4     71.0     27.6     29.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       57)
      11       10        7       30       23       43       39
```

----

Updated July 13, 2013
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 103 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 127
113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 103

                          [Report No. 113-549]

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District of Columbia 
              Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 23, 2014

  Ms. Norton submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

                             July 23, 2014

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District of Columbia 
              Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR D.C. SPECIAL 
              OLYMPICS LAW ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN.

    On October 3, 2014, or on such other date as the Speaker of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration 
of the Senate may jointly designate, the 29th annual District of 
Columbia Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution 
referred to as the ``event'') may be run through the Capitol Grounds to 
carry the Special Olympics torch to honor local Special Olympics 
athletes.

SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

    The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as may be 
necessary to carry out the event.

SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

    The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for physical 
preparations for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, in connection with the event.
                                                 House Calendar No. 127

113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 103

                          [Report No. 113-549]

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District of Columbia 
              Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 23, 2014

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
Scott Howard MEYER, Petitioner, v. Emily PETERSON.

No. 19-729

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Minnesota denied.
Ernest L. FRANCWAY, Jr., Petitioner, v. Robert WILKIE, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

No. 19-604.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-83438 and Form S-8 No. 333-55723) pertaining to the 1994 Stock
Incentive Plan of Maxwell Shoe Company Inc. of our report dated December 20,
1999, except for Note 11, as to which the date is January 5, 2000, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Maxwell Shoe Company Inc. included
in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended October 31, 1999.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Maxwell Shoe
Company Inc. listed in Item 14(a)(2).  This schedule is the responsibility of
the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on
our audits.  In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above,
when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.



                                                    ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
January 21, 2000
Donald J. TRUMP, President of the United States, et al., petitioners, v. Aiden STOCKMAN, et al.

No. 18-678.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.01


                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

 1.    Crescent Real Estate Equities, Ltd., a Delaware corporation

 2.    Crescent Real Estate Equities Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited 
       partnership

 3.    CRE Management I Corp., a Delaware corporation

 4.    CRE Management II Corp., a Delaware corporation

 5.    CRE Management III Corp., a Delaware corporation

 6.    CRE Management IV Corp., a Delaware corporation

 7.    CRE Management V Corp., a Delaware corporation

 8.    CRE Management VI Corp., a Delaware corporation

 9.    CRE Management VII Corp., a Delaware corporation

10.    Crescent Real Estate Funding I, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership

11.    Crescent Real Estate Funding II, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership

12.    Crescent Real Estate Funding III, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership

13.    Crescent Real Estate Funding IV, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership

14.    Crescent Real Estate Funding V, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership

15.    Crescent Real Estate Funding VI, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership

16.    Crescent Real Estate Funding VII, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership

17.    Crescent Entertainment Company, L.P., a Texas limited partnership

18.    Crescent Entertainment Management L.L.C., a Texas limited liability 
       company

19.    CEC Management, L.L.C., a Texas limited liability company

20.    Crescent Duddlesten Hotel Partnership, L.P., a Texas limited partnership

21.    CresCal Properties, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership

22.    CresCal Properties, Inc., a Delaware corporation

23.    Woodlands Office Equities - '95 Limited, a Texas limited partnership

24.    Woodlands Retail Equities - '96 Limited, a Texas limited partnership

25.    CresWood Development, L.L.C. - a Texas limited liability company

26.    301 Congress Avenue, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership

27.    Crescent/301, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

28.    Crescent Commercial Realty Corp., a Delaware corporation




<PAGE>   2

29.    Crescent Commercial Realty Holdings, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership

30.    CresTex Development L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company

31.    G/C Waterside Associates LLC, a Texas limited liability company

32.    Crescent 1717 Main, L.L.C., a Texas limited liability company

33.    Crescent E&M, L.L.C., a Texas limited liability company

34.    Crescent Ervay & Main, L.P., a Texas limited partnership

35.    Main Street Partners, L.P., a Texas limited partnership

36.    Spectrum Mortgage Associates, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership

37.    Crescent Washington Harbour, LLC, a Delaware limited partnership
Order entered May 24, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 12

- 00316

- CR

CARLOS MEDRANO , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 439th Judicial District Court Rockwall County, Texas Trial Court C ause No. 2

- 11

- 418



### O RDER

We GRANT the State’s May 20, 2013 unopposed second motion for extension of time to

file the State’s brief. The State = s brief tendered to the Clerk of the Court on May 20, 2013 is

DEEMED timely filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Timothy J. JOHNSTON, Petitioner, v. MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., et al.

No. 18-1532

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Juan SANCHEZ, Petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 19-7097.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 108 (Monday, June 6, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 34279]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12041]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel; PAR 22-102 & PAR 22-103: 
Investigational New Drug (IND)-Enabling and Early-Stage Development 
of Medications to Treat Alcohol Use Disorder and Alcohol-Associated 
Organ Damage.
    Date: June 17, 2022.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, National Institute on 
Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 
20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Ranga Srinivas, Ph.D., Chief, Extramural Project 
Review Branch, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 
National Institutes of Health, 6700 B Rockledge Drive, Room 2114, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 451-2067, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#addedfc4c3c4dbccdfedc0ccc4c183c3c4c583cac2db"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3447465d5a5d4255467459555d581a5a5d5c1a535b42">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical 
Research and Research Support Awards, National Institutes of Health, 
HHS)

    Dated: May 31, 2022.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-12041 Filed 6-3-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Vincent KANE, Petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 19-7605.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 6, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office denied.
Ozzie DAVIS, Petitioner, v. Tom MCGINLEY, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Coal Township, et al.

No. 19-5296

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Edgar Baltazar GARCIA, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7482

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0                 164,143
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                 164,143
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0               9,057,146
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0               8,168,355
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                 177,104
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                (23,040)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0               9,057,146
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             (462,573)               (462,573)
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,837,830              27,801,663
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               106,535                (86,481)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             106,535                 193,885
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,193,868)            (28,350,717)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,193,868)            (28,350,717)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,193,868)            (28,350,717)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.06)                  (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

WARNER RECORDS INC. et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

ALTICE USA, INC. AND CSC HOLDINGS, LLC, 

Defendants. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Case No. 2:23-cv-00576-JRG-RSP 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE 

TO FILE AN ANSWER PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 6(b)(1)(B) 

Before the Court is Defendants Altice USA, Inc.’s and CSC Holdings, LLC’s Motion for Leave 

to File an Answer Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1)(B) (Dkt. No. 99). After 

consideration of said motion and the briefing concerning the same, upon the good cause shown, 

the Court is of the opinion that it should be GRANTED. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants shall be permitted to file their answer to 

the Complaint on or before November 4, 2024. 

Case 2:23-cv-00576-JRG-RSP Document 99-1 Filed 10/29/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 5118
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

CHARLESA FLATTEN,

 Plaintiff,

v. 

JIM FURASH, 

 Defendant. 

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-0197-JRG-RSP

ORDER

Jim Furash filed a Motion to Dismiss. (Dkt. No. 11). Magistrate Judge Payne entered 

a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 29) recommending the grant of the Motion 

to Dismiss. Charlesa Flatten filed Objections to the Report and Recommendation. (Dkt. No. 30). 

After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on the Motion to Dismiss, the Report 

and Recommendation, and the briefing on the Objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning set 

forth in the Report and Recommendation and concludes that the Objections fail to show that 

the Report and Recommendation was erroneous. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES 

Charlesa Flatten's Objections, ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, and GRANTS 

the Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 11). 

.

____________________________________

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 26th day of June, 2023.

Case 2:23-cv-00197-JRG-RSP Document 32 Filed 06/26/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 258
#### LENA DAHLY v. W. B. AUXER.1

July 9, 1909.

Nos. 16,199—(165).

Action in the district court for Clay county to recover $10,000 for personal injuries sustained while assisting in repairing a mangle in defendant’s laundry by removing the cloth therefrom and replacing it with other covering.

The complaint alleged that plaintiff was under eighteen years of age, inexperienced in making such repairs, and while so engaged Alma Moe, who was in charge of the mangle and a vice principal of defendant, without notice to plain-' tiff negligently put the machine in motion whereby plaintiff’s right hand was caught and held at least fifteen minutes in the machine until released, whereby the hand became disfigured and useless. The answer alleged want of ordinary care on the part of plaintiff.

The ease was tried before Baxter, J., and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $1,500. Prom an order denying defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, he appealed.

Affirmed.

*Robert M. Pollock, George B. Perley*and *George 8. Grimes,*for appellant.

*Rye ci Dosland,*for respondent.

1

 Reported in 122 N. W. 1135.

Per Curiam.

This record raises no questions which require extended consideration by this court. The respondent was injured while in the employ of the defendant, working in and about a mangle. In an action for damages she recovered a verdict for $1,500, and the appeal is from an order denying the defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or for a new trial. The record contains no prejudicial error.

The case is affirmed upon the authority of Cody v. Longyear, 103 Minn. 116, 114 N. W. 735; Dizonno v. Great Northern Ry. Co. 103 Minn. 120, 123, 114 N. W. 736; Lohman v. Swift & Co., 105 Minn. 148, 117 N. W. 418; Doerr v. Daily News Pub. Co., 97 Minn. 248, 106 N. W. 1044.

Order affirmed.
Ernest J. ESPINOZA, Petitioner, v. Matt A. ASHE, et al.

No. 19-7160

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statement on Forms S-8 (No. 33-77882, No. 33-77884, No. 33-77888, and 333-2133),
of DT Industries,  Inc. of our report dated August 5, 1998, appearing on page 20
of the fiscal 1998 Annual Report to Shareholders  of DT Industries,  Inc. (which
report and  consolidated  financial  statements are incorporated by reference in
this  Annual  Report on Form  10-K).  We also  consent to the  incorporation  by
reference of our report on the Financial Statement  Schedules,  which appears on
page S-2 of this Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
September 25, 1998