alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017220EN.01006301.xml

| 8.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/63

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 220/15)

| Member State | Italy |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Olbia-Milan Linate and vice versa |
| Period of validity of the contract | A period of four years starting on 9 November 2017 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | 9 July 2017 |
| Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained | Reference document


  OJ C 145 of 9 May 2017

  For further information please contact:





  Autonomous Region of Sardinia |
| Department of Transport |
| Directorate-General for Transport |
| Service for Maritime and Air Transport and Territorial Continuity |
| Via XXIX Novembre 1847, 41 |
| 09123 Cagliari |
| ITALIA |
| Tel. +39 0706067331 |
| Fax +39 0706067309 |
| Website: http://www.regione.sardegna.it |
| Email | : | trasporti@pec.regione.sardegna.it
  trasporti@regione.sardegna.it
  trasp.osp@regione.sardegna.it |

Member State

Italy

Route concerned

Olbia-Milan Linate and vice versa

Period of validity of the contract

A period of four years starting on 9 November 2017

Deadline for submission of tenders

9 July 2017

Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained

Reference document

Reference document

OJ C 145 of 9 May 2017

For further information please contact:

Autonomous Region of Sardinia

Department of Transport

Directorate-General for Transport

Service for Maritime and Air Transport and Territorial Continuity

Via XXIX Novembre 1847, 41

09123 Cagliari

ITALIA

Tel. +39 0706067331

Fax +39 0706067309

Website: http://www.regione.sardegna.it

Email

:

trasporti@pec.regione.sardegna.it

trasporti@regione.sardegna.it

trasp.osp@regione.sardegna.it

---
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 07/02/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      142,391
COMMITMENTS
  33,015   41,266   15,023   77,491   63,016  125,529  119,304   16,863   23,087

CHANGES FROM 06/25/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      4,112)
     762    2,653    3,005    1,853     -582    5,621    5,076   -1,509     -964

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    23.2     29.0     10.6     54.4     44.3     88.2     83.8     11.8     16.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      180)
      48       48       41       65       60      130      136
```

----

Updated July 8, 2013
1

The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the Northern District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-1877

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Northern District of Iowa.

Charles Edward Thomas, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: September 29, 2010

Filed: October 5, 2010

___________

Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

While Charles Thomas was serving the supervised release portion of his

sentence for failing to register as a sex offender, the district court1

 found that he

violated his release conditions. The court revoked supervised release and imposed a

revocation sentence of 12 months in prison and 8 years of supervised release. Thomas

appeals, arguing that his revocation sentence is unreasonable. 
-2-

We conclude that the revocation sentence is not unreasonable, because the court

properly considered relevant sentencing factors, including the repetitive nature of

some of the violations and the fact that one violation involved opening an electronic

mail file containing pornography. See United States v. Thunder, 553 F.3d 605, 608-09

(8th Cir. 2009). Further, the revocation sentence is within statutory limits. See 18

U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3), (h).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court; we grant counsel’s

motion to withdraw, subject to counsel informing appellant about procedures for

seeking rehearing or filing a petition for certiorari; and we deny Thomas’s pending

motion for appointment of counsel.

______________________________
Pereneal KIZZEE, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5272

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Paris TAYLOR, Petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 18-9484

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Opinion Research Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodending March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas L. Cox, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)          The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

| Date:     May 12, 2003 |   |   | Signed:      | /s/ DOUGLAS L. COX                                                      |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                            |   |   |         |                                                                         |
|                                            |   |   | Name: Title: | **Douglas L. Cox Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer** |
|                                                 |        |        |              |                                                                         |  |
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, 

INC.,

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP

JURY DEMANDED

NOTICE OF READINESS FOR SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

Plaintiff Headwater Research LLC respectfully submits this Notice of Readiness for 

Scheduling Conference confirming the following:

1. Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss For Failure To State A Claim (D.I. 28) is pending.

2. The asserted patents are U.S. Patent Nos. 8,406,733, 9,198,117, and 9,615,192.

3. There are no related cases previously filed in the Eastern District of Texas involving 

the same patents. 

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 30 Filed 07/19/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 900
2

Date: July 19, 2023 /s/ Marc Fenster

Marc Fenster

CA State Bar No. 181067

Reza Mirzaie

CA State Bar No. 246953

Brian Ledahl

CA State Bar No. 186579

Ben Wang

CA State Bar No. 228712

Paul Kroeger

CA State Bar No. 229074

Neil A. Rubin

CA State Bar No. 250761

Kristopher Davis

CA State Bar No. 329627

James S. Tsuei

CA State Bar No. 285530

Philip Wang

CA State Bar No. 262239

Amy Hayden

CA State Bar No. 287026

James Milkey

CA State Bar No. 281283

Jason M. Wietholter

CA State Bar No. 337139

RUSS AUGUST & KABAT

12424 Wilshire Blvd. 12th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90025

Telephone: 310-826-7474

rak_headwater@raklaw.com

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF,

Headwater Research LLC

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 30 Filed 07/19/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 901
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that this document is being served upon counsel of record for Defendants on July 

19, 2023 via ECF.

/s/ Marc Fenster

Marc Fenster

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 30 Filed 07/19/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 902
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/02/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      164,898
COMMITMENTS
  39,905   34,156   23,922   83,050   80,845  146,877  138,924   18,021   25,975

CHANGES FROM 03/26/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -8,066)
    -953   -3,385   -2,851   -2,767     -497   -6,572   -6,733   -1,494   -1,332

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    24.2     20.7     14.5     50.4     49.0     89.1     84.2     10.9     15.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      197)
      50       47       43       71       77      143      151
```

----

Updated April 5, 2013
Barbara E. BROWN, Petitioner, v. SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, et al.

No. 19-7471.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 21


                               G&L Realty Corp.
                              List of Subsidiaries
                                 July 31, 2001


1.   G&L Hampden, Inc., a Delaware corporation
2.   G&L Hampden, LLC a Delaware limited liability company
3.   G&L Realty Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
4.   G&L Realty Financing II, Inc., a Delaware corporation
5.   G&L Realty Financing Partnership II, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
6.   G&L Medical, Inc., a Delaware corporation
7.   G&L Gardens, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company
8.   G&L Management Delaware Corp., a Delaware corporation
9.   G&L Senior Care, Inc., a Delaware corporation
10.  G&L Medical Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
11.  GLN Capital Co. LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
12.  GL/PHP, LLC a Delaware limited liability company
13.  Theme World, L.P., a New Jersey limited partnership
14.  435 N. Roxbury Drive, Ltd., a California limited partnership
15.  G&L - Grabel San Pedro, LLC
16.  G&L Burbank, LLC
17.  G&L Burbank Managers Corp., a California corporation
18.  G&L Holy Cross, LLC
19.  G&L Holy Cross Managers Corp., a California corporation
20.  G&L Tustin, LLC
21.  G&L Tustin Managers Corp., a California corporation
22.  G&L Valencia, LLC
23.  G&L Penasquitos, LLC
24.  G&L Penasquitos, Inc.
25.  GLH Pacific Gardens, LLC
26.  GLH Pacific Gardens Corp., a California corporation
27.  G&L Hoquiam, LLC
28.  G&L Lyons, LLC
29.  G&L Coronado (1998), LLC
30.  G&L Parsons on Eagle Run, LLC
31.  G&L Parsons on Eagle Run, Inc.
32.  Lakeview Associates, LLC
33.  Tustin Heritage Park, LLC
34.  G&L Heritage Care, LLC
35.  G&L Heritage Care, Inc.
36.  G&L Massachusetts, LLC
37.  G&L Aspen, LLC
Elicia BAILEY, petitioner, v. Jeremy GASAWAY.

No. 18-8611.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 23, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TEXARKANA DIVISION

OPTIMORPHIX, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v. 

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., 

Defendant. 

Civil Action No. 5:23-cv-126-RWS-JBB

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

OPTIMORPHIX, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v. 

AMAZON.COM, INC. AND AMAZON WEB

SERVICES,INC., 

Defendants. 

Civil Action No. 5:23-cv-123-RWS-JBB

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

OPTIMORPHIX, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v. 

CA, INC., 

Defendant. 

Civil Action No. 5:23-cv-134-RWS-JBB

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

OPTIMORPHIX, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v. 

MICROSOFT CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

Civil Action No. 5:23-cv-150-RWS-JBB

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

OPTIMORPHIX, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v. 

F5, INC. 

Defendant. 

Civil Action No. 5:24-cv-26-RWS-JBB

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Case 5:23-cv-00150-RWS-JBB Document 26 Filed 04/29/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 606
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

CAME ON FOR CONSIDERATION, Plaintiff OptiMorphix, Inc. (“OptiMorphix” or 

“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”); Amazon.com, Inc.; Amazon Web 

Services, Inc.; Amazon.com Services LLC (collectively, “Amazon”); CA, Inc. (“CA”); Microsoft 

Corporation (“Microsoft”); and F5, Inc. (“F5”), hereafter Plaintiff and Defendants 

collectively referred to as “the Parties’,” Joint Motion to Continue Scheduling Conference. 

Having considered the motion, it is hereby GRANTED. 

Accordingly, the telephone scheduling conference in these matters shall be 

continued until June 6, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. No later than one week before the scheduling 

conference, the parties shall file a Joint Conference Report as outlined in the April 24, 2024 

Order. 

2

.

____________________________________

J. Boone Baxter

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

SIGNED this the 29th day of April, 2024.

Case 5:23-cv-00150-RWS-JBB Document 26 Filed 04/29/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 607
Dennis RYDBOM, Petitioner, v. Donnie AMES, Superintendent, Mount Olive Correctional Complex.

No. 19-7448.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia denied.
Leslie Moore MIRA, Petitioner v. Argus MEDIS, et al.

No. 19-186

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
EX-10.2



 EXHIBIT 10.2 
 Time Warner Inc. 
 Notice of Grant of Restricted Stock Units to Non-Employee Director

 TIME WARNER INC. (the “Company”), pursuant to the Company’s 2010 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), hereby
grants (the “Award”) to the undersigned Participant the following restricted stock units (the “RSUs”), subject to the terms and conditions of this Notice, the Restricted Stock Units Agreement, Directors Version 2 (10RUDIR2), and
the Plan. Each RSU represents the unfunded, unsecured right of the Participant to receive a Share on the date(s) specified herein. The Plan and the Restricted Stock Units Agreement, both of which are incorporated into and made a part of this Notice,
can be accessed and printed through Fidelity’s Netbenefits.com website (Plan Information & Documents). 
  

			
	       1.     Name:	  	ID:

  

	 	2.	Grant Information for this Award: 

 Restricted
Stock Unit Grant Number: 
 Date of Grant: 
 Total Number of Restricted Stock Units Granted: 
  

	 	3.	The vesting date shall be: 

 The Vesting Date
shall be in the first year following the Date of Grant on the first day of the month in which the Date of Grant occurred. 100% of the number of the Total Number of Restricted Stock Units Granted will vest on the Vesting Date. 

The Restricted Stock Units will vest earlier than the Vesting Date in connection with certain terminations of service as a director of the Company,
as provided in the Restricted Stock Units Agreement and Plan; and the Restricted Stock Units will be canceled and forfeited upon certain terminations of service as a director of the Company, as provided in the Restricted Stock Units Agreement and
Plan.
Sherif PHILIPS, petitioner, v. NORTH CAROLINA, et al.

No. 18-6611.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until February 4, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Larry Wesley BROWN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-8263.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.3**CERTIFICATION**I, Ronald A. Mayo, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of MediaNews Group, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date:March 27, 2008       /S/ Ronald A Mayo        Ronald A. Mayo    Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
John A. TOTH, Petitioner, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 19-7043.

Supreme Court of the United States.

June 1, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 85 

Expressing the sense of Congress that a commemorative postage stamp should 

be issued in honor of the Buffalo Soldiers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 21, 2014 

Mrs. BEATTY (for herself, Mr. ENYART, Ms. HAHN, Mr. BUTTERFIELD, Ms. 

SPEIER, Mr. MEEKS, Ms. NORTON, and Mr. MCNERNEY) submitted the 

following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Oversight and Government Reform 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that a commemorative 

postage stamp should be issued in honor of the Buffalo 

Soldiers. 

Whereas, on July 28, 1866, Congress established six allBlack regiments, later consolidated to four, to help rebuild the country after the Civil War and to patrol the 

remote western frontier during the Indian wars; 

Whereas Colonel Charles Young was a Buffalo Soldier and 

the highest ranking African-American commanding officer in the United States Army from 1894 until his death 

in 1922; 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HCON 85 IH 

Whereas more than 200,000 African-Americans served in 

World War I and more than 1 million served in World 

War II; 

Whereas the Buffalo Soldiers received their name because of 

the buffalo’s fierce bravery and fighting spirit; 

Whereas African-American troops accepted the name, Buffalo 

Soldiers, with pride and honor; 

Whereas the Buffalo Soldiers fought alongside White regiments in many conflicts and were instrumental in the exploration and settlement of western lands; 

Whereas, over the 82 years of the Buffalo Soldiers’ existence, 

23 men received the Congressional Medal of Honor, the 

highest recognition awarded by the United States Government for military service; 

Whereas the Buffalo Soldiers ceased to exist in 1948 when 

President Harry Truman signed Executive Order 9981 

mandating equal treatment and opportunity for AfricanAmerican servicemen; 

Whereas the Buffalo Soldiers are a significant part of American military history; 

Whereas a stamp was issued in honor of the Buffalo Soldiers 

on April 22, 1994, and this stamp was placed on ‘‘off 

sale’’ in December 1995; and 

Whereas reissuing a postage stamp to honor the Buffalo Soldiers is fitting and proper: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that— 

3 (1) a commemorative postage stamp should be 

4 issued in honor of the Buffalo Soldiers; and 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•HCON 85 IH 

1 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee 

2 should recommend to the Postmaster General that 

3 such a stamp be issued. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
CHH EX 10.01 BAINUM






Exhibit 10.01


AMENDMENT TO 
AMENDED AND RESTATED CHAIRMAN’S SERVICES AGREEMENT




This Amendment (“Amendment”) is made as of January 1 2012 by and between Choice Hotels International, Inc. ("Choice"), and Stewart Bainum, Jr. (“Mr. Bainum”) and amends that certain Amended and Restated Chairman’s Services Agreement dated September 10, 2008 between the parties (“Agreement”).  


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises contained in this Amendment, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree to the following terms:


1.  Compensation.  Section 3(a) of the Agreement is deleted and replaced with the following: 


(a)  Base salary of 235,000 per annum payable in bi-weekly installments. 


2.  Miscellaneous.


(a) All other provisions of the Agreement not modified by this Amendment remain in full force and effect.


(b)  The Agreement and this Amendment contains the entire agreement of the parties, and supersedes all other agreements, discussions or understandings concerning the subject matter. The Agreement may be changed only by an agreement in writing signed by both parties. 




Choice Hotels International, Inc.                     	
	
	By:   /s/ Ervin R. Shames 

	 






Chairman:
	
	
	/s/ Stewart Bainum, Jr. 

	Stewart Bainum, Jr.