alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 10(g)
                   EXTENSION OF EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         THIS EXTENSION OF EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is
made and entered into as of the 8 day of December, 2003 and to be effective as
of the 1st day of January, 2004 (the "Effective Date"), between Visual Data
Corporation, a Florida corporation, whose principal place of business is 1291
S.W. 29th Avenue, Pompano Beach, Florida 33069 (the "Company") and Gail Babitt,
an individual whose address is __ (the "Executive").

         WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive are parties to that certain
Executive Employment Agreement effective as of January 1, 2002 (the "Employment
Agreement").

         WHEREAS, the initial term of the Employment Agreement expires on
December 31, 2003.

         WHEREAS, the Company is desirous of extending the term of the
Employment Agreement for an additional one year period and the Executive has
agreed to such extension.

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained in
this Agreement, and other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto
agree as follows:

         1.       Recitals. The recitals set forth above are true and correct
and incorporated herein by reference.

         2.       Extension of Term. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 4 of
the Employment Agreement, the Term of the Employment Agreement is hereby
extended to the December 31, 2004.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as
of the date first above written.

         Witnesses                         VISUAL DATA CORPORATION

__________________________         By: /s/ Randy S. Selman
                                       -----------------------------------------
__________________________                       Randy S. Selman, President

__________________________         /s/ Gail Babitt
                                       -----------------------------------------
__________________________                  Gail Babitt
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 7, 2016.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00407-CV

SANTOS SAN JUAN D/B/A SANTOS WRECKER REPAIR, Appellant

V.

JOSE SEGOVIA, Appellee

On Appeal from the 80th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-06117

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

In two issues, appellant challenges the legal and factual sufficiency of the 

evidence to support the jury’s answer to Jury Question No. 3 regarding appellee’s 

damages. We affirm because appellant has not preserved error.

We may not consider unpreserved issues. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Lenk, 

361 S.W.3d 602, 604 (Tex. 2012); see also Tex. R. App. P. 33.1; Allright, Inc. v. 

Pearson, 735 S.W.2d 240, 240 (Tex. 1987). In a case tried to a jury, legal and

factual sufficiency issues must be preserved in the trial court. See Daniels v. 
2

Empty Eye, Inc., 368 S.W.3d 743, 748–49 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2012, 

pet. denied). A legal sufficiency challenge may be preserved in one of five ways: 

“(1) a motion for directed verdict, (2) a motion for judgment notwithstanding the 

verdict, (3) an objection to the submission of the issue to the jury, (4) a motion to 

disregard the jury’s answer to a vital fact issue, or (5) a motion for new trial.” Id. 

A factual sufficiency challenge must be raised in a motion for new trial. Id. at 749 

(citing Tex. R. Civ. P. 324(b)(2)).

Appellant filed a motion for new trial and challenged the legal and factual 

sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury’s answers to Question Nos. 1 and 2 

concerning liability. But he did not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence 

supporting the jury’s answer to Question No. 3 or any of the elements of damages 

he now challenges on appeal. Thus, appellant’s motion for new trial did not 

preserve any error urged on appeal. See Halim v. Ramchandani, 203 S.W.3d 482, 

487 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2006, no pet.) (no error preserved when 

arguments in motion for new trial differed from legal and factual sufficiency 

arguments made on appeal); see also City of Houston v. Precast Structures, 60 

S.W.3d 331, 335–36 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2001, pet. denied).

Neither the Reporter’s Record nor the Clerk’s Record show that appellant 

urged any of the other motions or objections necessary to preserve a legal 

sufficiency challenge. Thus, appellant has not preserved error. See Halim, 203 

S.W.3d at 487. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

/s/ Sharon McCally

Justice

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, McCally, and Busby.
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/09/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       51,727
COMMITMENTS
   2,426    4,399    2,166   45,127   42,919   49,719   49,484    2,008    2,243

CHANGES FROM 04/02/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      9,509)
     724      -29       29    8,474    9,299    9,227    9,299      282      210

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     4.7      8.5      4.2     87.2     83.0     96.1     95.7      3.9      4.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       44)
       5        8        7       23       24       33       34`

---

Updated April 17, 2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       4,142,000
<SECURITIES>                                   360,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,030,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,481,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,234,000
<PP&E>                                       2,168,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,169,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,586,000
<BONDS>                                      1,141,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        84,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,358,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,169,000
<SALES>                                     13,423,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,323,000
<CGS>                                        6,338,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,338,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,972,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             214,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,120,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,120,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,120,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .27


</TABLE>
-1-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

VIRTAMOVE, CORP.,

Plaintiff,

v.

HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE

COMPANY,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Case No. 2:24-cv-00093-JRG

(Lead Case) 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

VIRTAMOVE, CORP.,

Plaintiff,

v.

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS 

MACHINES

CORP.,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Case No. 2:24-CV-00064-JRG

(Member Case) 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF VIRTAMOVE, CORP.’S OPPOSITION TO 

DEFENDANT HPE’S MOTION TO TRANSFER (DKT. 87)

Before the Court is HPE’s Motion to Transfer. The Court, having considered Defendant’s 

Motion, Plaintiff’s Opposition, and Defendant’s Reply, is of the opinion that Defendant’s Motion 

should be DENIED. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company’s 

Motion to Transfer is DENIED.

Case 2:24-cv-00093-JRG Document 102-24 Filed 11/05/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 5186
Mark Anthony JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9797

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

XR COMMUNICATIONS LLC D/B/A 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES

v.

AT&T, INC., ET AL.

§

§

§

§

§

§

Case No. 2:23-CV-0202-JRG-RSP

ORDER

Previously, the Court appointed Michael Paul as the technical advisor to the Court in this 

action with his costs to be assessed equally between Plaintiff and Defendant and timely paid as 

billed. The Court has received Mr. Paul’s invoice for services through November 11, 2024, in the 

amount of $11,226.40 and hereby ORDERS payment to be promptly made as follows:

Plaintiff: $5,613.20

Defendants: $5,613.20

Defendants are hereby ORDERED to appoint a lead counsel to collect payment from 

Defendants and to make a single payment to Mr. Paul on behalf of all Defendants.

Case 2:23-cv-00202-JRG-RSP Document 121 Filed 12/19/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:

3340
# C_2017440EN.01000101.xml

| 21.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 440/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 440/1

---

Commission Notice on the EU Guide for Good Hygiene Practices in the production of artisanal cheese and dairy products

(2017/C 440/01)

In accordance with the outcome of the assessment carried out, the Standing Committee on the Plant, Animal, Feed and Food (PAFF) agreed on the publication of the title and references of the following Community guide to good practice, pursuant to Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the hygiene of foodstuffs (1).

1

Title
  : European Guide for Good Hygiene Practices in the production of artisanal cheese and dairy products

Title

Author
  : Farmhouse and Artisan Cheese & Dairy Producers European Network (FACE network)

Author

Reference
  : Revised version of 20 December 2016

Reference

https://ec.europa.eu/food/safety/biosafety/food_hygiene/guidance_en

---

(1)  OJ L 139, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Independent Auditors' Consent 
 
 
 
To the Shareholders and Directors of the 
Smith Barney/Travelers Series Fund Inc.: 
 
We consent to the use of our reports dated December 12, 1995 with respect to 
the Portfolios listed below of the Smith Barney/Travelers Series Fund Inc. 
incorporated herein by reference and to the references to our Firm under the 
headings "Financial Highlights" in the Prospectus and "Independent Auditors" 
in the Statement of Additional Information. 
 
 
Portfolios 
 
Smith Barney Income and Growth Portfolio 
 
Alliance Growth Portfolio 
 
American Capital Enterprise Portfolio 
 
Smith Barney International Equity Portfolio 
 
Smith Barney Pacific Basin Portfolio 
 
TBC Managed Income Portfolio 
 
Putnam Diversified Income Portfolio 
 
G.T. Global Strategic Income Portfolio 
 
Smith Barney High Income Portfolio 
 
MFS Total Return Portfolio 
 
Smith Barney Money Market Portfolio 
 
 
 
 
 
	KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP 
 
 
New York, New York 
February 27, 1995
PNM 3.31.2012 EX.10.4






Exhibit 10.4
FIRST AMENDMENT
TO THE
PNM RESOURCES, INC.
EXECUTIVE SAVINGS PLAN II
Effective as of December 15, 2004, PNM Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) adopted the PNM Resources, Inc. Executive Savings Plan II (the “Plan”).  The Plan has been amended on a number of occasions, with the most recent restatement being generally effective as of January 1, 2009.  By this instrument, the Company now desires to amend the Plan to eliminate the special credits that are provided due to a Change in Control. 
1.    This First Amendment shall be effective as of January 1, 2012.
2.    This First Amendment amends only the provisions of the Plan as set forth herein, and those provisions not expressly amended hereby shall be considered in full force and effect.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, this First Amendment shall supersede the provisions of the Plan to the extent those provisions are inconsistent with the provisions and intent of this First Amendment.
3.    Section 3.4(c) (Supplemental Credits - Termination During the Plan Year) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 
(c)    Termination During the Plan Year.  An Eligible Officer must be employed on December 1 of the relevant Plan Year in order to receive the Supplemental Credit called for by Section 3.4 (Supplemental Credits) for that Plan Year.  Notwithstanding the prior sentence, an Eligible Officer shall receive a pro-rata Supplemental Credit if the Eligible Officer incurs a Separation from Service before December 1 of any Plan Year under any of the following circumstances:  (1) after reaching Normal Retirement Date; (2) under circumstances that entitle the Eligible Officer to receive benefits under the Officer Retention Plan; (3) due to Disability or (4) due to the death of the Eligible Officer.  The pro-rata Supplemental Credit shall be calculated based on the time elapsed between December 1 of the prior Plan Year and the date of the Eligible Officer's Separation from Service as compared to 365 days and shall be credited to the Eligible Officer's Supplemental Credit Account within thirty (30) days of 













the Eligible Officer's Separation from Service.  For example, if an Eligible Officer terminates employment on June 1, 2012 due to retirement, the Eligible Officer will receive 50% of the Supplemental Credits for the 2012 Plan Year and that amount will be credited to the Eligible Officer's Supplemental Credit Account by July 1, 2012.
4.    Section 3.6 (Special Change In Control Provisions) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:


3.6    Reserved.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, PNM Resources has caused this First Amendment to be executed as of this _28__ day of _March________, 2012.


PNM RESOURCES, INC.
By:    /s/ Patrick Apodaca                                                   
      Its:    Sr. V.P., General Counsel & Secretary
Case 4:23-mj-00629-KPJ Document 1 Filed 12/18/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 107 (Friday, June 3, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 33805]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11909]



[[Page 33805]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4516-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]


New Hampshire; Amendment No. 9 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of New Hampshire (FEMA-4516-DR), dated April 3, 2020, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on May 17, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Lori A. 
Ehrlich, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating 
Officer for this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Paul F. Ford as Federal 
Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2022-11909 Filed 6-2-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Jomo WILLIAMS, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5481

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
NASSAU COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Petitioner, v. Mark ORLANDO.

No. 18-1421.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020.

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Eastern District of Texas

12/29/2023

Case 2:23-cv-00633-JRG-RSP Document 4 Filed 12/29/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 46
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) . I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

Other (specify):

. My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 2:23-cv-00633-JRG-RSP Document 4 Filed 12/29/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 47
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 15 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on any legisla3 tive day from Friday, February 15, 2013, through Thurs4 day, February 21, 2013, on a motion offered pursuant to 

5 this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his 

6 designee, it stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Monday, Feb7 ruary 25, 2013, or until the time of any 
2 

•HCON 15 EH 

1 reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolu2 tion, whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate re3 cesses or adjourns on Friday, February 15, 2013, on a 

4 motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by 

5 its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed or 

6 adjourned until noon on Monday, February 25, 2013, or 

7 such other time on that day as may be specified in the 

8 motion to recess or adjourn, or until the time of any re9 assembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolu10 tion, whichever occurs first. 

11 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority 

12 Leader of the Senate, or their respective designees, acting 

13 jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of the 

14 House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify 

15 the Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, 

16 to reassemble at such place and time as they may des17 ignate if, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant 

18 it. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 15, 

2013. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 15 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for a conditional adjournment of the 

cess or adjournment of the Senate. House of Representatives and a conditional re-
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/28/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       90,465
COMMITMENTS
  23,661    5,537    2,022   58,917   80,890   84,600   88,449    5,865    2,016

CHANGES FROM 05/21/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        980)
     805     -142        9      346    1,659    1,160    1,526     -180     -546

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    26.2      6.1      2.2     65.1     89.4     93.5     97.8      6.5      2.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       79)
      10        5        2       41       37       52       43
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/28/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      216,492
COMMITMENTS
  63,566   35,638    4,514  132,177  169,087  200,257  209,239   16,235    7,253

CHANGES FROM 05/21/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      6,102)
    -816     -754    2,292    5,760    3,701    7,236    5,239   -1,134      863

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    29.4     16.5      2.1     61.1     78.1     92.5     96.6      7.5      3.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      150)
      38       16       13       75       50      121       71
```

----

Updated May 31, 2013