alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.7






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. §1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Eldorado Gold Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Fabiana Chubbs, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)           The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 Date:  March 30, 2012

By:

/s/ Fabiana Chubbs

Fabiana Chubbs

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Eldorado Gold Corporation and will be retained by Eldorado Gold Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                 Exhibit 32 (i)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF

         I, Randy S. Selman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report of Visual Data Corporation on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of Visual Data Corporation.

December 17, 2003

                                             By:/s/ Randy S. Selman
                                             Name: Randy S. Selman
                                             Title: Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

THE RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR 

THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW 

YORK; UNIVERSITY OF 

CONNECTICUT; and WORCESTER 

POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.; 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, 

INC.; SAMSUNG AUSTIN 

SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC; SAMSUNG 

SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.,

Defendants.

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2-23-CV-000141-RWS-RSP

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO 

SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(a)(i), Plaintiffs The Research Foundation 

for The State University of New York, University of Connecticut, and Worcester Polytechnic Institute 

(collectively, “Plaintiffs” and/or “the Universities”) hereby dismiss without prejudice all claims against

Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC in the above captioned case. 

This notice is properly filed pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(a)(i) before Samsung Austin

Semiconductor, LLC serves an answer or a motion for summary judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 

41(a)(1)(A)(i). This notice dismisses only Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC and has no effect on 

the remaining defendants in this case. 

Case 2:23-cv-00141-RWS-RSP Document 30 Filed 08/31/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 701
2 

Accordingly, the Universities request this Court enter an Order acknowledging this Notice of 

dismissal and dismissing without prejudice all claims asserted in this case by Plaintiffs against Samsung 

Austin Semiconductor, LLC, with both sides to bear their own costs and fees. 

DATED: August 31, 2023 /s/ Michael A. Siem by permission Claire Abernathy Henry

Michael A. Siem – LEAD ATTORNEY

(pro hac vice forthcoming) 

Emilio F. Grillo

(pro hac vice forthcoming) 

Cedric Tan

(pro hac vice forthcoming) 

Chiara M. Carni

(pro hac vice forthcoming) 

GOLDBERG SEGALLA LLP

711 Third Avenue, Suite 1900

New York, New York 10017

Telephone: (646) 292-8700

msiem@goldbergsegalla.com

egrillo@goldbergsegalla.com

ctan@goldbergsegall.com

cmcarni@goldbergsegalla.com

 

Of Counsel: 

 

Claire Abernathy Henry

TX Bar No. 24053063

Andrea L. Fair

TX Bar No. 24078488

WARD, SMITH & HILL, PLLC

PO Box 1231

Longview, Texas 75606-1231

Telephone: (903) 757-6400

Facsimile: (903) 757-2323

claire@wsfirm.com

andrea@wsfirm.com

 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS 

 

Case 2:23-cv-00141-RWS-RSP Document 30 Filed 08/31/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 702
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served on all counsel of record 

by email on this 31st day of August, 2023.

 /s/ Claire Abernathy Henry

Claire Abernathy Henry

Case 2:23-cv-00141-RWS-RSP Document 30 Filed 08/31/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 703
Michael JONES, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7045.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

FRAMETECH LLC,

 Plaintiff,

v.

CA, INC.,

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00452-JRG-RSP

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff FrameTech LLC and Defendant CA, Inc.’s Joint Motion to 

Stay All Deadlines and Notice of Settlement. (Dkt. No. 10.) Having considered the Motion, and 

noting its joint nature, the Court finds that it should be and hereby is GRANTED.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the December 4, 2023 scheduling conference is 

adjourned and all deadlines in the above-captioned case are STAYED for thirty (30) days from 

the date of this Order during which time appropriate dismissal papers are to be filed with the Court.

Case 2:23-cv-00452-JRG-RSP Document 11 Filed 11/15/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 71
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 02/19/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       48,587
COMMITMENTS
   5,237    2,323    3,849   26,708   29,881   35,793   36,053   12,793   12,534

CHANGES FROM 02/12/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        178)
    -220     -576      781     -189      185      373      390     -195     -213

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    10.8      4.8      7.9     55.0     61.5     73.7     74.2     26.3     25.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       55)
       7       10       10       33       26       47       41
```

----

Updated February 22, 2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,987
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,575
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,677
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               114,291
<PP&E>                                       1,889,347
<DEPRECIATION>                                 232,111
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,771,527
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           99,176
<BONDS>                                      1,214,525
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        101
<COMMON>                                           436
<OTHER-SE>                                     455,791
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,771,527
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               212,833
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  244,630
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,686
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,095
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              73,167
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (31,797)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (31,797)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (31,797)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.32)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              7
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from Form 10-Q for
the six months ended June 30, 1997, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>      1
       
<S>                                 <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  94,536,390
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            0
<EQUITIES>                             9,112,232
<MORTGAGE>                                     0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                       106,355,634
<CASH>                                   113,831
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                        36,322
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                10,909,631
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       122,321,709
<POLICY-LOSSES>                        7,487,793
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                    7,880,348
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                  66,453
<OTHER-SE>                            99,585,196
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         122,321,709
<PREMIUMS>                            16,833,618
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                    2,973,579
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                         5,851
<OTHER-INCOME>                             6,030
<BENEFITS>                             2,285,746
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>            1,957,443
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                   4,667,363
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       10,908,526
<INCOME-TAX>                           3,428,438
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    7,480,088
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                           7,480,088
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.07
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            JUN-24-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-25-1999
<CASH>                                             1,664
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      4,492
<ALLOWANCES>                                        (136)
<INVENTORY>                                        3,441
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   9,804
<PP&E>                                             4,070
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (3,117)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    10,842
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              3,527
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                              75
<OTHER-SE>                                         7,154
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      10,842
<SALES>                                            5,745
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   5,745
<CGS>                                              2,832
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      2,832
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   2,802
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    19
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      130
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  130
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                         130
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.02



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 233 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 61
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 233

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 24, 1999

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

                             March 17, 1999

               Reported by Mr. Chafee, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To designate the Federal building located at 700 East San Antonio 
Street in El Paso, Texas, as the ``Richard C. White Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 700 East San Antonio Street in El 
Paso, Texas, shall be known and designated as the ``Richard C. White 
Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Richard C. White 
Federal Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 23, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                     

                                                        Calendar No. 61

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 233

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To designate the Federal building located at 700 East San Antonio 
Street in El Paso, Texas, as the ``Richard C. White Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 17, 1999

                       Reported without amendment
```
Unassociated Document


Exhibit 10.14







MEMO FROM SIBLING ENTERTAINMENT HOLDINGS, INC.







Date: October 1, 2011







From: Gerald Sullivan, Chairman







TO: Oswald Gayle







RE: Conversion of Debt







As Chairman of Sibling Entertainment, I want to thank you for your willingness to help us by agreeing to accept shares of the common stock of SIBE in exchange for our obligations to you. Please accept this as support for the issuance as noted below:







On October 1, 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with Oswald A. Gayle, CFO, pursuant to which the Company issued 661,173 shares of common stock valued at $132,235 to convert debt for services as CFO for the period April 1, 2011 to September 30, 2011. These were issued on October 3, 2011.







Please note that these shares are restricted under Rule 144 and cannot be traded for at least six (6) months. Also note that the stock trades infrequently, and there may be no trading market for the shares when you are ready to trade. Also note that the Series common stock, which you are an owner of, may convert into common stock and that event may cause dilution to the common stock, and reduce the share price, or market for the stock.












Thanks again, and I look forward to working with you going forward.







/s/ GERALD F. SULLIVAN


Gerald F. Sullivan


Chairman
1 The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief J udge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 10-1877

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Northern District of Iowa. Charles Edward Thomas, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: September 29, 2010 Filed: October 5, 2010

___________ Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. While Charles Thomas was serving th e supervised release portion of his sentence for failing to register as a sex offender, the district court 1 found that he violated his release conditions. The cour t revoked supervised release and imposed a revocation sentence of 12 months in prison a nd 8 years of supervised release. Thomas appeals, arguing that his revocation sentence is unreasonable.-2- We conclude that the revocation senten ce is not unreasonable, because the court properly considered relevant sentencing f actors, including the repetitive nature of some of the violations and the fact thatone violation involved opening an electronic mail file containing pornography. See United States v. Thunder , 553 F.3d 605, 608-09 (8th Cir. 2009). Further, the revocati on sentence is within statutory limits. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3), (h). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court; we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, subject to counsel in forming appellant about procedures for seeking rehearing or filing a petition for certiorari; and we deny Thomas’s pending motion for appointment of counsel.

______________________________
Ernest VEREEN, Jr., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6405

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
RULE 56(f) NOTICE OF NON-MOVANT JERRAL W. JONES’ ENTITLEMENT TO 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT PAGE 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TEXARKANA DIVISION 

JERRAL W. JONES, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

ALEXANDRA DAVIS and CYNTHIA 

DAVIS f/k/a CYNTHIA DAVIS-SPENCER, 

Defendants.

CIVIL ACTION No. 5:23-cv-00032-RWS 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

ORAL HEARING REQUESTED 

RULE 56(f) NOTICE OF NON-MOVANT JERRAL W. JONES’S 

ENTITLEMENT TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

Pursuant to Rule 56(f)(1), Plaintiff Jerral W. Jones hereby provides notice and opportunity 

to respond as set forth in his Responses in Opposition to Summary Judgment, ECF Nos. 125 and 

126, of non-movant’s entitlement to summary judgment. Plaintiff hereby requests oral hearing of 

the same at the Court’s convenience. 

 

Case 5:23-cv-00032-RWS Document 128 Filed 06/04/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 2543
RULE 56(f) NOTICE OF NON-MOVANT JERRAL W. JONES’ ENTITLEMENT TO 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT PAGE 2

FOLSOM ADR PLLC 

/s/ David Folsom 

David Folsom 

State Bar No. 07210800 

david@folsomadr.com 

6002-B Summerfield Dr. 

Texarkana, TX 75503 

(903) 277-7303 

JACKSON WALKER LLP 

/s/Charles L. Babcock 

Charles L. Babcock 

State Bar No. 01479500 

cbabcock@jw.com 

Nancy W. Hamilton 

State Bar No. 11587925 

nhamilton@jw.com 

1401 McKinney Street 

Suite 1900 

Houston, TX 77010 

(713) 752-4210 

(713) 752-4221 - Fax 

David T. Moran 

State Bar No. 14419400 

dmoran@jw.com 

Edwin Buffmire 

State Bar No. 24078283 

ebuffmire@jw.com 

Cody Martinez 

State Bar No. 24102146 

cmartinez@jw.com 

2323 Ross Avenue 

Suite 600 

Dallas, TX 75201 

(214) 953-6000 

(214) 953-5822 – Fax 

ATTORNEYS FOR JERRAL W. JONES

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

On June 4, 2024, I electronically submitted the foregoing document with the clerk of the 

court of the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas, using the electronic case filing system 

of the court. I hereby certify that I will serve all counsel and/or pro se parties of record 

electronically or by another manner authorized by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5(b)(2). 

/s/ Edwin Buffmire 

Edwin Buffmire 

Case 5:23-cv-00032-RWS Document 128 Filed 06/04/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 2544
Andrew CLARKE, Petitioner, v. Russell R. MCMURRAY, Commissioner, Georgia Department of Transportation.

No. 19-736

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Donald WILLEMS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5038.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 7 -00723 -CV
In r e Edwar d M ic hae l Be ll
ORIG IN A L PR OC E E D IN GFR OM T OM G R E E N C OU N T Y M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N Edwar d Michae l Be ll has petitioned for a writ o f ma n damus order ing the district court to act on his pro se motion for a ppointment of counsel for the purpose of re questingfore nsic DNA testing. SeeTex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 64.01(c) (West Supp. 2007). While this petit ion was pending , the t rial court denied the motion for appointed counsel after c oncludingthat there are no rea sonable grounds for a

testing motion to be filed. Se eid . Be cause the trial cour t has ac ted on the motion, the request for

mandamus relief has been rende red moot. The pe tition for writ of mandamus is denied. SeeTex. R. App. P . 52.8(a) .

__________________________________________ J an P. Patterson, J ustice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Puryear and He nson Filed: F ebrua

ry 22, 2008