alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________ __ _

NO. 09
- 11
- 00 602
- CV

________________ __ _
IN RE COMMITMENT OF JAMES A. RUBIO

________________________________________ _________________________ _ On Appeal from the 435th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 11
- 04
- 04400 CV

________________________________________ ________________________ _ MEMORANDUM OPINION The State filed a motion to dismiss James A. Rubio’s appeal of a civil
commitment that the trial court ordered after a jury found him to be a sexually violent predator. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 841.001

- .151 (West 2010 & Supp. 2012) (SVP statute). The SVP commitment order was not stayed pending appeal. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann

. § 841.081(a) (West 2010) . The State alleged that on October 1, 2012, Rubio violated the terms of the SVP order by leaving his court

- ordered residence without prior written authorization from the
trial court , and that Rubio did not voluntarily return to hi s residence.2 On December 6, 2012, w e ordered that the appeal would be dismissed with prejudice un less , within ten days , Rubio complie d with the trial court’s SVP
commitment order by returning to the Travis County Residential Center or by surrendering hims elf to an offic er with the power to execute the warrant for his arrest. On January 14, 2013, the State notified the Court that on January 7, 2013, Rubio was apprehended without having voluntarily surrendered. On January 31, 2013, Rubio filed a motion to retain the appeal and reinstate the briefing schedule. He contends that he is no longer a flight risk

. Rubio failed to demonstrate that he complied with the trial court’s order within the time specified in this Court’s order of December 6, 2012. Rubio f ailed to comply with a court order. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). We provided an opportunity to explain why the appeal should not be dismissed, but Rubio failed to establish good cause for retaining the appeal. The appeal is dis missed with prejudice.
APPEAL DISMISSED.

______________________________ HOLLIS HORTON Justice

Opinion Delivered Fe bruary 14, 2013 Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

I, Dana D. Messina, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SteinwayMusical Instruments, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing equivalentfunctions):

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: November 7, 2003 |                          |   |
|-----------------------------|-------------------------------|--------|
|                        |                          |   |
|                        | /s/ Dana D. Messina           |   |
|                        | Dana D. Messina               |   |
|                        |                          |   |
|                        | Director, President and Chief |   |
|                        | Executive Officer             |   |

 

----
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 106 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR GOLD 

4 MEDAL CEREMONY IN HONOR OF FALLEN 

5 HEROES OF 9/11. 

6 Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center is 

7 authorized to be used on September 10, 2014, for a 
2 

•HCON 106 EH 

1 ceremony to award Congressional Gold Medals in honor 

2 of the men and women who perished as a result of the 

3 terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 

4 2001. Physical preparations for the conduct of the cere5 mony shall be carried out in accordance with such condi6 tions as may be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 25, 2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 106 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the 

11, 2001. rorist attacks on the United States on September and women who perished as a result of the terCongressional Gold Medals in honor of the men Capitol Visitor Center for a ceremony to award
##### 



LodgeNet Interactive Corporation
    

    Form 10-Q
 Exhibit 32
 LODGENET INTERACTIVE CORPORATION
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of LodgeNet.
 th
 /s/ Scott C. PetersenScott C. PetersenChief Executive Officer/s/ Gary H. RitondaroGary H. RitondaroChief Financial Officer March 31, 2008
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

CHRISTOPHER WALTON (1)

§

§

§ CRIMINAL NO. 4:23-CR-242-SDJ-AGD-1

§

§

§

 

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in 

this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On December 13, 2023, the Magistrate Judge entered 

proposed findings of fact and recommendations (Dkt. #13) that Defendant be 

committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of nine

(9) months, with twenty-four (24) months of supervised release to follow under the 

previous conditions of supervised release.

Having received the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #13)

and having received Defendant’s waiver of his right to object to the proposed findings 

and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #12), the Court is of the opinion 

that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the 

Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, 

Defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be 

imprisoned for a term of nine (9) months, with twenty-four (24) months of supervised 

Case 4:23-cr-00242-SDJ-AGD Document 14 Filed 02/06/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 46
2

release to follow under the previous conditions of supervised release. The Court

recommends Defendant be placed at FCI Seagoville in Seagoville, Texas, if 

appropriate.

Case 4:23-cr-00242-SDJ-AGD Document 14 Filed 02/06/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 47
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

REDSTONE LOGICS LLC

Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00485-JRG

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

JOINT MOTION TO ENTER AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Plaintiff Redstone Logics LLC and Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung 

Electronics America, Inc., respectfully file this Joint Motion to for entry of the proposed Protective 

Order, attached as Exhibit A.

Case 2:23-cv-00485-JRG Document 31 Filed 04/22/24 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 192
2

Dated: April 22, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Richard L. Rainey

Richard L. Rainey

Ali Mojibi Yazdi

Brian Bieluch

COVINGTON & BURLING LLP

One CityCenter

850 Tenth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20001-4956

(202) 662-6000

rrainey@cov.com

Melissa R. Smith

Tom Gorham

GILLAM & SMITH LLP

303 S. Washington Ave.

Marshall, TX 75670

(903) 934-8450

melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., 

LTD. AND SAMSUNG 

ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.

/s/ Reza Mirzaie 

Reza Mirzaie

CA State Bar No. 246953

Marc A. Fenster

CA State Bar No. 181067

Neil A. Rubin

CA State Bar No. 250761

Christian W. Conkle

CA State Bar No. 306374

Jonathan Ma

CA State Bar No. 312773

RUSS AUGUST & KABAT

12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90025

Telephone: 310-826-7474

Email: rmirzaie@raklaw.com

Email: mfenster@raklaw.com

Email: nrubin@raklaw.com

Email: cconkle@raklaw.com

Email: jma@raklaw.com

Qi (Peter) Tong

TX State Bar No. 24119042

RUSS AUGUST & KABAT

4925 Greenville Ave, Suite 200

Dallas, TX 75206

Telephone: 310-826-7474

Email: ptong@raklaw.com

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF,

REDSTONE LOGICS, LLC.

Case 2:23-cv-00485-JRG Document 31 Filed 04/22/24 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 193
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic 

service are being served this 22nd day of April 2024, with a copy of this document via the Court’s 

CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3).

/s/ Reza Mirzaie

Reza Mirzaie

Case 2:23-cv-00485-JRG Document 31 Filed 04/22/24 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 194
4

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

The undersigned certifies that counsel complied with the requirements of Eastern District 

of Texas Local Rule CV-7(h). The parties are in agreement on filing this Joint Motion.

/s/ Reza Mirzaie

Reza Mirzaie

Case 2:23-cv-00485-JRG Document 31 Filed 04/22/24 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 195
Alfredo GALINDO, Petitioner, v. Brad CAIN, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution.

No. 19-8076.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATION AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000918904
<NAME> THE SELMER COMPANY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-04-1998
<CASH>                                           7,198
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,161
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,866
<INVENTORY>                                     85,953
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               154,530
<PP&E>                                          78,197
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,880
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 266,334
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,057
<BONDS>                                        111,718
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      82,101
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   266,334
<SALES>                                         78,126
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                78,126
<CGS>                                           52,415
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,641
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,766
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   152
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,841
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,311
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,840
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,471
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,471
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 4,471.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 4,471.00
        

</TABLE>
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-60470

Summary Calendar

KENRICK CICERO, also known as Kenrick Albert Cicero,

Petitioner

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A035 205 085

Before KING, STEWART, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Kenrick Cicero petitions for review of the decision of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal of an immigration judge’s

finding that he did not obtain derivative citizenship as a result of his father’s

naturalization. A nationality claim is a question of law that we review de novo.

Marquez-Marquez v. Gonzales, 455 F.3d 548, 554 (5th Cir. 2006). “Petitioner has

the burden of proving that he qualifies for naturalization, and he must do so in

the face of the Supreme Court’s mandate that we resolve all doubts in favor of

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 13, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 09-60470 Document: 00511078287 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/13/2010
No. 09-60470

2

the United States and against those seeking citizenship.” Bustamante-Barrera

v. Gonzales, 447 F.3d 388, 394-95 (5th Cir. 2006).

Relying on the provisions of former 8 U.S.C. § 1432, Cicero argues that he

was in the custody of his father in 1980 when his father became a naturalized

citizen. Former section 1432 requires in relevant part that the child of divorced

parents, such as Cicero, have been in the sole legal custody of the naturalized

parent. See Bustamante-Barrera, 447 F.3d at 395-96.

Cicero’s parents’ divorce decree awarded custody of Cicero to his mother.

Although Cicero argues that other evidence shows that his parents agreed that

he would be in his father’s custody, there is no evidence that his father ever

obtained the required sole legal custody of him. See Bustamante-Barrera, 447

F.3d at 395-96; see also Nehme v. I.N.S., 252 F.3d 415, 426 (5th Cir.

2001)(interpreting phrase “legal separation” in the same statute). As Cicero has

not shown that he was in the sole legal custody of his father, he has not shown

that he obtained derivative citizenship under § 1432. See Bustamante-Barrera,

447 F.3d at 395-96.

Cicero’s petition for review is DENIED. Cicero’s motions for appointment

of counsel and for release on bond pending the disposition of his petition for

review also are DENIED.

Case: 09-60470 Document: 00511078287 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/13/2010
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 32 Received in Senate (RDS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 32

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2013

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the National Honor Guard 
                       and Pipe Band Exhibition.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF THE CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NATIONAL HONOR GUARD AND PIPE 
              BAND EXHIBITION.

    (a) In General.--The Grand Lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police 
and its auxiliary (in this resolution referred to as the ``sponsor'') 
shall be permitted to

              

 sponsor a public event, the National Honor Guard and Pipe Band 
Exhibition (in this resolution referred to as the ``event''), on the 
Capitol Grounds, in order to allow law enforcement representatives to 
exhibit their ability to demonstrate Honor Guard programs and provide 
for a bag pipe exhibition.
    (b) Date of Event.--The event shall be held on May 14, 2013, or on 
such other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate jointly designate.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board, the event shall be--
            (1) free of admission charge and open to the public; and
            (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The sponsor shall assume full 
responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all 
activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the 
sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, 
sound amplification devices, and other related structures and 
equipment, as may be required for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, in connection with the event.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 6, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 10/29/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       39,865
COMMITMENTS
   2,852    5,498    3,223   33,776   31,079   39,851   39,800       14       65

CHANGES FROM 10/22/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      4,995)
     876     -823      526    3,642    5,333    5,044    5,036      -49      -41

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     7.2     13.8      8.1     84.7     78.0    100.0     99.8      0.0      0.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       40)
       6        8        8       16       20       27       33`

---

Updated November 6, 2013
Derek CROSBY, Petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 19-7864.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 4, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 24 - 0396

_________________ IN RE MARRIAGE OF: CLINTON ANDERSON,

Petitioner and Appellee, and ANGELINA ROSE RUFFATO,

Respondent and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ The record was filed for purposes of this appeal on August 12 , 2024 . T he opening brief is now overdue. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Appellant shall prepare, file , and serve the opening brief on appeal no later than October 21 , 2024 . Failure to file the brief within that time will result in dismissal of this appeal with prejudice and without further notice. The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all parties .

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 20 2024

09/20/2024
Case Number: DA 24-0396
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 596 

Permitting the solicitation of donations in Senate buildings for the relief 

of victims of Superstorm Sandy. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2012 

Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself, Mr. RUBIO, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. COONS, Mr. 

CARPER, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr. 

DURBIN, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. NELSON of Florida, Mr. REED, Mr. WARNER, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. LEAHY, and Mr. ENZI) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Permitting the solicitation of donations in Senate buildings 

for the relief of victims of Superstorm Sandy. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. SOLICITATION FOR SUPERSTORM SANDY RE3 LIEF. 

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of the rules or 

5 regulations of the Senate— 

6 (1) a Senator, officer of the Senate, or em7 ployee of the Senate may solicit another Senator, of8 ficer of the Senate, or employee of the Senate within 

9 Senate buildings for nonmonetary donations for the 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•SRES 596 ATS 

1 relief of victims of Superstorm Sandy during the 30- 

2 day period beginning on the date on which the Sen3 ate agrees to this resolution; and 

4 (2) a Senator, officer of the Senate, or em5 ployee of the Senate may work with a nonprofit or6 ganization with respect to the delivery of donations 

7 described in paragraph (1). 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with
Peggy Jean CLARK, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, et al.

No. 19-7346.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.