alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PAGE 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION

HANSHOW TECHNOLOGY CO., 

LTD. AND SHANGHAI HANSHI 

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 

CO., LTD.,

Plaintiff,

v.

SES-IMAGOTAG SA, SESIMAGOTAG GMBH AND 

CAPTANA GMBH

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Case No. 2:23-CV-00617-RWS-RSP

DEFENDANTS SES-IMAGOTAG SA, SES-IMAGOTAG 

GMBH AND CAPTANA GMBH’S RULE 7.1 CORPORATE 

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, Defendants disclose the following 

information: VusionGroup SA (f/k/a SES-imagotag SA) is a public nongovernmental party. 

VusionGroup GmbH (f/k/a SES-imagotag GmbH) and Captana GmbH are private nongovernmental parties. VusionGroup GmbH and Captana GmbH are wholly owned subsidiaries of 

VusionGroup SA. VusionGroup SA is a publicly traded corporation on the Euronext exchange. 

Entities that own more than 10 percent of the capital and voting rights of VusionGroup SA include 

BOE Smart Retail (Hong Kong) Co., Limited and SESIM. BOE Smart Retail (Hong Kong) Co., 

Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary of BOE Technology (HK) Limited. SESIM’s share capital is 

held by VusionGroup SA’s and affiliate’s management teams.

Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 39 Filed 04/25/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 463
RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PAGE 2 

Dated: April 25, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

 

/s/ Matthew C. Acosta 

Matthew C. Acosta

Texas Bar No. 24062577 

macosta@plattrichmond.com 

Alex Jacobs

Texas Bar No. 24124175 

ajacobs@plattrichmond.com

 Heather M. Crabill

Texas State Bar No. 24131151 

hcrabill@plattrichmond.com 

PLATT RICHMOND PLLC

1201 N. Riverfront Blvd., Suite 150 

Dallas, TX 75207 

Tel. (214) 559-2700 

Fax: (214) 559-4390 

Grant E. Kinsel 

Washington State Bar No. 49576 

Perkins Coie LLP 

1201 Third Avenue Suite 4900 

Seattle, WA 98101 

Tel: (206) 359-3516 

Fax: (206) 359-9000 

Matthew J. Moffa 

New York Bar No. 5045067 

Perkins Coie LLP 

1155 Avenue of the Americas, 22nd FL

New York, NY 10036 

Tel. (212) 261-6857 

Fax: (212) 399-8057 

Eric H. Findlay 

State Bar No. 00789886 

Findlay Craft, P.C. 

7270 Crosswater Avenue 

Suite B

Tyler, Texas 75703 

Tel: (903) 534-1100 

Fax: (903) 534-1137 

Attorneys for Defendants VusionGroup SA, 

VusionGroup GmbH, and Captana GmbH.

Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 39 Filed 04/25/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 464
RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PAGE 3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that on April 25, 2024, a true and correct copy of the above 

foregoing document was served on the counsel of record via the Court’s CM/ECF system.

/s/ Matthew C. Acosta

MATTHEW C. ACOSTA

Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 39 Filed 04/25/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 465
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Eastern District of Texas

Phone Check Solutions, LLC

2:23-cv-00511

Blackbelt Smartphone Defence LTD., et al.

Blackbelt Smartphone Defence LTD. 

Level 4 Friars House 

Figflex Manor House Drive 

Coventry, CV1 2TE 

United Kingdom

Christian W. Conkle 

RUSS AUGUST & KABAT 

12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, California 90025 

Email: cconkle@raklaw.com 

Telephone: (310) 826-7474 11/7/2023

Case 2:23-cv-00511-JRG-RSP Document 4 Filed 11/07/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 21
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

2:23-cv-00511 0.00 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00511-JRG-RSP Document 4 Filed 11/07/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 22
1

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

LATRICE SALVADOR

v. 

TARGET CORPORATION

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 4:23-cv-585-SDJ-KPJ

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in 

this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On November 6, 2023, the Magistrate Judge entered 

proposed findings of fact and a recommendation (the “Report”), (Dkt. #13), that 

Plaintiff Latrice Salvador’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Remand, (Dkt. #7), and Defendant 

Target Corporation’s (“Target”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Petition (the 

“Motion to Dismiss”), (Dkt. #9), be denied.

Having received the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no 

timely objections being filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and 

conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s 

Report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand, (Dkt. #7), and Target’s Motion to 

Dismiss, (Dkt. #9), are denied.

Case 4:23-cv-00585-SDJ-KPJ Document 15 Filed 01/31/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 59
2

Case 4:23-cv-00585-SDJ-KPJ Document 15 Filed 01/31/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 60
a50265749ex10-1.htm


EXHIBIT 10.1


 




 



	
TO:

	
Kevin Sipes

	
DATE:

	
March 21, 2012

	 
	  	  	  	  	 
	
FROM:

	
Steve Trager

	
SUBJECT:

	
TCB Acquisition Bonus Program







 


You will be eligible for a bonus based on the achievement of the following TCB Acquisition goals for the time period of January 28, 2012 through July 31, 2012:


 



	
  

	
1.

	
Convert all TCB loans and deposit accounts to Horizon within six months













	
  

	
2.

	
Experience non-loan, operational losses of less than $100,000







 


Your total incentive payout potential is $50,000.00


 


This incentive payout will be earned and paid on August 10, 2012 provided you are an employee in good standing with the Bank at that time.


 


Management reserves the right in its sole discretion to adjust goals, individual participants’ payouts, etc.




 



	
/s/ Kevin Sipes

	 	
/s/ March 21, 2012

	 
	  	 	  	 
	
Kevin Sipes

	 	
Date
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT


TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
NN, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and date indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.









Date: 
      March 31, 2009
              By:
              /s/ James
      H. DortonJames
      H. DortonVice
      President – Corporate Development and Chief Financial
    Officer








[A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
NN, Inc. and will be retained by NN, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
# C_2017384EN.01001203.xml

| 14.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 384/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 384/12

---

SESAR JOINT UNDERTAKING

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2016

(2017/C 384/46)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://www.sesarju.eu/newsroom/brochures-publications/annual-accounts-2016

---
Stipulated Motion to Transfer to the Northern District of Texas – Dallas Division Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JOSEPH BOND, on behalf of himself and 

others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff,

v. 

FOLSOM INSURANCE AGENCY LLC,

CODY FOLSOM, and BERKSHIRE

HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

CIVIL ACTION FILE NO.

1:24-cv-00075-MJT

STIPULATED MOTION TO 

TRANSFER TO THE NORTHERN 

DISTRICT OF TEXAS,

DALLAS DIVISION

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

/

Come now the Plaintiff, Joseph Bond, and Defendant Folsom Insurance Agency, LLC and 

hereby jointly move for this Court to transfer this Action to the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division. In support thereof, the parties state that the Defendant 

Folsom Insurance Agency LLC had its headquarters and principal place of business in Mabank, 

Texas, at the time of the incident at issue, which lies within Kaufman County, which lies within 

the Dallas Division of the Northern District of Texas. The purpose of this motion is to more 

expediently consolidate the proceedings close to the primary Defendant, for the convenience of 

the parties, and in the interests of justice and for no improper or dilatory purpose. 

Therefore, the Parties stipulate and request that this matter be transferred via inter-district 

transfer to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division. 

Case 1:24-cv-00075-MJT Document 15 Filed 09/09/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 64
Stipulated Motion to Transfer to the Northern District of Texas – Dallas Division Page 2 of 2

Respectfully submitted,

PARONICH LAW, P.C.

By: /s/ Anthony Paronich

Anthony Paronich

Email: anthony@paronichlaw.com

350 Lincoln Street, Suite 2400

Hingham, MA 02043

Telephone: (508) 221-1510

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

THOMPSON, COE, COUSINS & IRONS, L.L.P.

By: /s/ Jason R. Jobe

Jason R. Jobe

State Bar No. 24043743

Email: jjobe@thompsoncoe.com

Yesha P. Patel

State Bar No. 24098228

Email: ypatel@thompsoncoe.com

Plaza of the Americas

700 N. Pearl Street, 25th Floor

Dallas, Texas 75201-2832

Telephone: (214) 871-8200

Telecopy: (214) 871-8209

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS FOLSOM 

INSURANCE AGENCY, LLC, AND CODY 

FOLSOM

Case 1:24-cv-00075-MJT Document 15 Filed 09/09/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 65
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 90 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR HOLOCAUST 

4 DAYS OF REMEMBRANCE CEREMONY. 

5 Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center is 

6 authorized to be used on April 30, 2014, for a ceremony 

7 as part of the commemoration of the days of remembrance 
2 

•HCON 90 EH 

1 of victims of the Holocaust. Physical preparations for the 

2 conduct of the ceremony shall be carried out in accordance 

3 with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect 

4 of the Capitol. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 7, 2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 90 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the 

of victims of the Holocaust. the commemoration of the days of remembrance Capitol Visitor Center for a ceremony as part of
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6490
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ARNOLD LLOYD JACKSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (5:02-cr-30020-MFU-13) Submitted: August 14, 2008 Decided: August 20, 2008 Before MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Arnold Lloyd Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Arnold Lloyd Jackson appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jackson , No. 5:02-cr-30020-MFU-13 (W.D. Va. Mar. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
AL CANNON, SHERIFF, CHARLESTON COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA, Petitioner, v. Broderick William SEAY, Jr.

No. 19-311.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* granted. Petition *2634for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied. Justice Thomas, Justice Alito, and Justice Kavanaugh would grant the petition for writ of certiorari.
Richard CURTIS, Petitioner, v. Lyneal WAINWRIGHT, Warden.

No. 19-5363

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio denied.
ESTATE OF Esther KLIEMAN, BY AND THROUGH Its Administrator, Aaron KESNER, et al., Petitioners, v. PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY, aka Palestinian Interim Self-Government Authority, et al.

No. 19-741.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 27, 2020

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit for further consideration in light of the Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act of 2019, Pub. L. No. 116-94, div. J, tit. IX, § 903, 133 Stat. 3082. Justice Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.