alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-20676

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EFRAIN LOPEZ-FLORES, also known as Efrain Flores Lopez, also known as 

Efrain Lopez Flores, also known as Efrain F. Lopez, also known as Efrain 

Flores, also known as Efrain Lopez, 

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:13-CR-57-1

Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Efrain Lopez-Flores

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lopez-Flores has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 16, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-20676 Document: 00513638758 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/16/2016
No. 15-20676

2

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-20676 Document: 00513638758 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/16/2016
Hector Guadalupe LOZANO, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9756

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Sonya PETTAWAY, petitioner, v. TEACHERS INSURANCE AND ANNUITY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, et al.

No. 17-8081.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 24, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Jose ANDRADE, Petitioner v. CITY OF HAMMOND, INDIANA, et al.

No. 18-1525

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Indiana, Third District denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 104 (Tuesday, May 31, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 32432]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11593]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Bilingualism in AD.
    Date: July 22, 2022.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Dario Dieguez, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Branch, National Institutes of Health, National 
Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 
827-3101, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b5d1d4c7dcda9bd1dcd0d2c0d0cff5dbdcdd9bd2dac3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ff9b9e8d9690d19b969a988a9a85bf919697d1989089">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 25, 2022.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst. Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-11593 Filed 5-27-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Dalton Laquane SMITH, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7562.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
ex4-6.htm





Exhibit 4.6


 



Summary of Agreement between Hainan Jinpan Electric Co. Ltd. and Guilin Jin Fu Investment Co. Ltd. to acquire Guilin Jun Tai Fu Construction and Development Co. Ltd.







Hainan Jinpan Electric Co. Ltd. (“ Hainan Jinpan”) entered into an agreement (“Agreement”) with Guilin Jin Fu Investment Co. Ltd. (“GJF”) on March 20, 2011 to acquire the 100% of the equity of GJF’s wholly owned subsidiary, Guilin Jun Tai Fu Construction and Development Co. Ltd. (“JTF”).







The parties agreed that the Agreement would become binding if (1) JTF’s financial statements are true and clear and (2) the results of an audit or assessment by the Hainan Jinpan’s finance or accounting personnel or by an audit firm appointed by Hainan Jinpan conform to the representations made in the Agreement.







The parties agreed that if the aforementioned conditions are not satisfied within 30 days of the signing of this Agreement, then this Agreement would become non-binding.  Furthermore, except for liquidated damages in the amount of RMB 200,000 to be paid by the party at fault for causing the Agreement to become nonbinding, neither party will assume any additional legal liability or see damages from the other party on the basis of this Agreement.







GJF agreed to transfer all its equity in JTF to Hainan Jinpan according to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.  The Hainan Jinpan agreed to accept the transfer of all the equity in JTF from GJF according to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.  After the transfer,  Hainan Jinpan would own 100% of the equity of JTF and have all the corresponding shareholder rights.







The parties agreed that Hainan Jinpan would pay GJF a purchase price of RMB 15,000,000 in exchange for 100% of the equity of JTF.







The parties agreed that within seven (7) business days of the execution of the Agreement, GJF would complete the following:








	
·  

	
Assist and cooperate with Hainan Jinpan to complete documentation of the equity transfer according to applicable laws, regulations, and JTF’s corporate articles;








	
·  

	
Work with Hainan Jinpan to register the transfer of JTF with applicable government agencies;








	
·  

	
Transfer to  Hainan Jinpan all its management rights in JTF;








	
·  

	
Provide to Hainan Jinpan all corporate records and documents, as specified in the Agreement;












The parties agreed that within 30 business days of the execution of the Agreement Hainan Jinpan shall pay GJF 90% of the Purchase Price.  The parties further agreed that Hainan Jinpan will pay the balance of the purchase price within 30 business days of completing change of the records of business registration of JTF.







 Hainan Jinpan paid the purchase price in full to GJF on April 21, 2011 and the parties closed on the Agreement.
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 03/26/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       53,878
COMMITMENTS
   1,767    5,327    1,838   48,782   45,078   52,387   52,243    1,491    1,635

CHANGES FROM 03/19/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,259)
     470     -880      241      829    2,165    1,540    1,526     -281     -267

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     3.3      9.9      3.4     90.5     83.7     97.2     97.0      2.8      3.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       45)
       5        9        7       24       26       34       37`

---

Updated March 29, 2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                         JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                     6960
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              0
<PP&E>                                  880,550
<DEPRECIATION>                          156,271
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          813,934
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         0
<BONDS>                                 224,706
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                  10
<COMMON>                                    159
<OTHER-SE>                              269,817
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            813,934
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         81,814
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            56,819
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          1,164
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       11,368
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          18,594
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      18,594
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                             18,594
<EPS-BASIC>                                1.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                              1.03


</TABLE>
Elijah Loren ARTHUR, Sr., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES

No. 18-8076

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 122 

Providing for a correction in the enrollment of H.R. 83. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 10, 2014 

Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky submitted the following concurrent resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the 

Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for a correction in the enrollment of H.R. 83. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 83, 

3 the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall amend the 

4 long title so as to read: ‘‘Making consolidated appropria5 tions for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2015, and 

6 for other purposes.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 12-34V

Filed: March 26, 2014

Not for Publication

*************************************

JOYCE RUTH CULBERTSON, *

*

 Petitioner, * Attorneys’ fees and costs decision based on

 * stipulation of fact

v. *

 *

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

 *

 Respondent. *

*

*************************************

Larry C. Brandt, Walhalla, SC, for petitioner.

Linda S. Renzi, Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1

On March 26, 2014, the parties filed a stipulation of fact in which they agreed on an 

appropriate amount for attorneys’ fees and costs in this case.

In accordance with the General Order #9 requirement, petitioner asserts that she incurred 

no out-of-pocket expenses in pursuit of her petition. Petitioner submitted her request for 

attorneys’ fees and costs to respondent. During informal discussions, respondent raised 

objections to certain items in petitioner’s application. Based on these objections, petitioner

 

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this 

case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal 

Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 

2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made 

available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is 

privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and 

move to redact such information prior to the document=s disclosure. If the special master, upon review, 

agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall 

redact such material from public access.
2

amends her request for reimbursement for attorneys’ fees and costs to $24,107.32. Respondent 

does not object to this amount. The undersigned finds this amount to be reasonable. 

Accordingly, the court awards $24,107.32, representing reimbursement for attorneys’ fees and 

costs. The award shall be in the form of a check made payable jointly to petitioner and Larry C. 

Brandt, P.A., in the amount of $24,107.32.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the 

court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 26, 2014 s/ Laura D. Millman

 Laura D. Millman

 Special Master

 

2

Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or 

jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                              11,880
<SECURITIES>                                       300,841
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,184,986
<ALLOWANCES>                                       107,000
<INVENTORY>                                      1,028,626
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,868,715
<PP&E>                                           9,438,547
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,784,726
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,550,399
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,893,504
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             2,475
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,519,788
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,550,399
<SALES>                                         15,415,759
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,415,759
<CGS>                                           12,338,333
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,282,048
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   429,721
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 517,075
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (296,010)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       101,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (195,010)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (195,010)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.08)




</TABLE>
Francienna B. GRANT, Petitioner, v. Marshall L. WILLIAMS.

No. 19-7405.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division denied.
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 02/19/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       88,917
COMMITMENTS
   6,670    5,073       44   76,474   81,395   83,188   86,512    5,729    2,405

CHANGES FROM 02/12/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        957)
     238      -93       44      548    1,053      830    1,004      127      -47

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     7.5      5.7      0.0     86.0     91.5     93.6     97.3      6.4      2.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       71)
       8        5        1       36       35       45       40
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 02/19/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      186,850
COMMITMENTS
  43,738   24,925    1,179  126,602  157,468  171,519  183,572   15,331    3,278

CHANGES FROM 02/12/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      6,059)
   1,154    2,234      -84    4,093    4,008    5,163    6,158      896      -99

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    23.4     13.3      0.6     67.8     84.3     91.8     98.2      8.2      1.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      144)
      39       14        3       70       40      112       54
```

----

Updated February 22, 2013
# C_2017048EN.01001001.xml

| 15.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/10

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2017/C 48/11)

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Aluminium radiators | The People’s Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1039/2012 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of aluminium radiators originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ L 310, 9.11.2012, p. 1) | 10.11.2017 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Aluminium radiators

The People’s Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1039/2012 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of aluminium radiators originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ L 310, 9.11.2012, p. 1)

10.11.2017

---

(1)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

1

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
Order filed May 10, 2016

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14

- 14

- 00509

- CR

____________

RAFAEL ALEXANDER AVE LLANEDA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 248th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1389517



### ORDER

On August 18, 2015, this C ourt ordered the trial court to make written findings

of fact and conclusions of law as to whether appellant’s statement was made

voluntarily, as required by Article 38.22, section 6 of the Texas Code of Criminal

Procedure. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 38.2 2 § 6. On September 17, 2015

, a

supplemental clerk’s record was filed in response to our order. The supplementalclerk’s record did not, however, contain findings of fact and conclusions of law

signed by the trial court.

Accordingly, the trial court is directed to reduce to writing and sign its

findings of fact and conclusions of law on the voluntariness of appellant’s statement

, if they have not already been signed, and have a supplemental clerk’s record

containing those signed findings of fact and conclusions of law filed with the c lerk

of this Court on or before June 1, 2016.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM