alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 1, 2021

No. 04-20-00589-CV

IN RE Eloise and Ruben GUZMAN

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

On December 7, 2020 relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus. On February 17, 

2021, we conditionally granted the petition. On March 2, 2021, real party in interest filed a 

“Motion for Emergency Stay and for Rehearing” asking this court to withdraw our order 

conditionally granting the petition for writ of mandamus, order the trial court to stay its 

proceedings, and grant her motion for rehearing. On March 3, 2021, we granted real party in 

interest’s motion for stay, ordered the trial court proceedings to be stayed pending our 

disposition of the real party in interest’s motion for rehearing, and asked relators to file a 

response by March 18, 2021. No response has been filed. 

Accordingly, we GRANT real party in interest’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our 

February 17, 2021 opinion and order and ORDER that the respondent and real party in interest

may file a response to the petition in this court within seven days of this order. Any such 

response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4. The trial court proceedings 

will continue to be STAYED pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus. 

It is so ORDERED on April 1, 2021.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2020-CV-0212, styled Ruben Guzman and Eloise Guzman v. Mary A.

Derrick and All Other Occupants, pending in the County Court, Guadalupe County, Texas, the Honorable Bill 

Squires presiding.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 1st day of April, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
IN RE Vincent JOHNSON, Petitioner

No. 19-5257

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Aimee HANKINS, Petitioner, v. Tim LOWE.

No. 19-7634.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/21/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       20,533
COMMITMENTS
   2,442    9,240    1,549   16,232    9,465   20,223   20,254      310      279

CHANGES FROM 08/14/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,495)
    -478    1,467      357    2,166      156    2,045    1,980     -550     -485

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    11.9     45.0      7.5     79.1     46.1     98.5     98.6      1.5      1.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       30)
       6        5        5       15       12       23       21`

---

Updated August 24, 2012
Prentis RUPERT, Petitioner v. Keith BOWERS, et al.

No. 18-9286

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
          BOSTON FINANCIAL TAX CREDIT FUND VIII, A Limited Partnership


                                 EXHIBIT [32.1]

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Financial Tax Credit Fund VIII
(the "Fund") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Executive Vice President, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.



                                                   /s/Jenny Netzer
                                                   Jenny Netzer
                                                   Executive Vice President
                                                   MMA Financial, LLC

                                                   Date:  August 13, 2004






A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

<PAGE>
Andre Derrell LEE, Petitioner, v. Jerry GOODWIN, Warden.

No. 18-9294

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

) Civil Case No. 6:23-cv-00553-JCB

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Notice is hereby given that Defendants, National Labor Relations Board, et al., appeal to 

the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit from the Opinion and Order issued by 

the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas on March 8, 2024 (Docket Nos.

44-45), as corrected on March 18, 2024 (Docket No. 47). 

Respectfully submitted,

KEVIN P. FLANAGAN

Deputy Assistant General Counsel

(No official bar number in Maryland)

Tel: (202) 273-2938

kevin.flanagan@nlrb.gov

/s/ Christine Flack

CHRISTINE FLACK

Supervisory Attorney

Case 6:23-cv-00553-JCB Document 48 Filed 05/07/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 973
2

(No official bar number in Maryland)

Tel: (202) 273-2842

christine.flack@nlrb.gov

TYLER WIESE

Senior Attorney

Minnesota Bar No. 0329601

Tel: (952) 703-2891

tyler.wiese@nlrb.gov

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

Contempt, Compliance, and Special Litigation 

Branch 

1015 Half St. SE 

Washington, DC 20003

Fax: (202) 273-4244

Attorneys for Defendants

Dated: May 7, 2024

Case 6:23-cv-00553-JCB Document 48 Filed 05/07/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 974
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on May 7, 2024, I filed the foregoing document, Notice of Appeal, with this 

Court using the CM/ECF filing system, and a copy is being served on the ECF Filers 

electronically by the Notice of Docket activity.

/s/ Christine Flack

CHRISTINE FLACK

Supervisory Attorney

(No official bar number in Maryland)

Tel: (202) 273-2842

Fax: (202) 273-4244

christine.flack@nlrb.gov

Case 6:23-cv-00553-JCB Document 48 Filed 05/07/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 975
William TONG, Attorney General of Connecticut, Petitioner, v. TWEED-NEW HAVEN AIRPORT AUTHORITY, et al.

No. 19-735.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Exhibit 10.5.3

                                Brian P. Menezes
                              307 Block House Road
                        Greenville, South Carolina 29615


Safety Components International, Inc.
Attn:  Compensation Committee
41 Stevens Street
Greenville, South Carolina 29605

Gentlemen:

      This letter will memorialize our agreement with respect to my receipt of a
change  of  control  bonus  from  Safety  Components  International,  Inc.  (the
"Company").

      Upon the closing of the proposed sale by Zapata Corporation, the Company's
largest stockholder, of all of its shares of the Company's stock to WLR Recovery
Fund III, L.P. (or an affiliate  thereof) (the "Zapata Sale"),  the Company will
pay me a bonus in the amount of Four  Hundred Six Thousand  Dollars  ($406,000).
This payment shall be in lieu of any change of control bonus that is or might be
payable to me pursuant to my employment  agreement  with the Company as a result
of the Zapata Sale and the change(s) in the  composition of the Company's  Board
of Directors directly resulting from the Zapata Sale.

      The  Company  and I  have  not  reached  any  agreement  regarding  how my
employment  agreement  should  or will be  interpreted  in the event of a future
change of control which is unrelated to the Zapata Sale.  The parties also agree
that neither the Company's  payment of the change of control bonus in respect of
the Zapata Sale nor my acceptance thereof will be used as evidence in support of
any  interpretation  of  the  change  of  control  provisions  of my  employment
agreement in the event of a future  change of control  which is unrelated to the
Zapata Sale.

                                       Sincerely,

                                       Brian P. Menezes

                                       Daniel Tessoni
                                       On behalf of the Compensation Committee
Carol Johnene MORRIS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6786.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
Ronald Wesley JILES, Petitioner, v. MICHIGAN

No. 19-5281

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Eastern District of Texas 

Phenix Longhorn, LLC

2:23-cv-00477

AU Optronics Corporation, and Hisense Electronica 

Mexico, S.A. de C.V.

AU Optronics Corporation 

No. 1, Li-Hsin Road 2, Hsinchu Science Park, Hsinchu, 30078 Taiwan Fabio E. Marino 

WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON (US) LLP 

1279 Oakmead Parkway 

Sunnyvale, CA 94085

10/11/2023

Case 2:23-cv-00477-RWS-RSP Document 5 Filed 10/11/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 60
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

2:23-cv-00477 0.00 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00477-RWS-RSP Document 5 Filed 10/11/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 61
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXAS NO. WR-29,146-22

EX P ARTE ROLAND JEROME MADD EN, Appl icant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. W93-04717-H (G) IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1 F ROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam .

O R D E R Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code o f C ri m i n al Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted o f b urgl ary of a building and se ntence d to six ty -five year s’ imprisonment. In h i s prese nt application, Applicant raises one ground for revie w. This applicatio n , howeve r, prese nts a more serious question. This Court’s rec ords ref lect that Applicant has filed six prior applications perta ining to this conviction. It i s obvious from the rec ord that Applicant continues to raise issues that have been prese nted and reje cted in previous applications or that should2

have been prese nted in previous applications. The writ of habea s corpus is not to be lightly or easily abused. Sanders v. U.S. , 373 U.S. 1 (1963); Ex parte Carr , 511 S.W .2d 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974). Be cause of his repe titive claims, we hold that Applicant’s claim s ar e barred from revie w under Article 11.07, § 4, and are waived and abandone d by his abuse of the writ. This appli ca tion is dismiss ed. There fore , we instruct the Honora ble Abel Acosta, Clerk of the Court of Criminal Appea ls, not to acc ept or file the ins t an t ap p lication for a writ of habea s corpus, or any future application perta ining to this conviction unless Applicant is able to show in such an application that any claims prese nted have not been raised previously and that they could not have been presented in a previous application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Bilton , 602 S.W .2d 534 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980). Copies of this order shall be sent to the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal Justice-Corr ectional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division. Filed: De cembe r 10, 2014 Do not publish
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the filing of the Current Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter  ended June 30, 2002 (the Report) by Prime Retail,  Inc. (the  Company),
the undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     The information contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all  material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

    Date: August 14, 2002                  /s/  Glenn D. Reschke
                                           ----------------------
                                           Glenn D. Reschke
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
Kaleb Jermaine MYERS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7458

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
William T. WALTERS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-1393.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 615 

Congratulating the recipients of the 2012 Nobel Prize in Chemistry. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 12, 2012 

Mr. BURR (for himself, Mrs. BOXER, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, and Mrs. HAGAN) 

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the recipients of the 2012 Nobel Prize in 

Chemistry. 

Whereas the Nobel Prize is an international award administered by the Nobel Foundation in Stockholm, Sweden; 

Whereas the Nobel Prize has been awarded for outstanding 

achievements in physics, chemistry, physiology or medicine, literature, and peace since 1901; 

Whereas the Nobel Prize in Chemistry is awarded by the 

Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences in Stockholm, Sweden to recognize scientific advancements that have increased our understanding of chemical processes and 

their molecular basis; 

Whereas the 2012 Nobel Prize in Chemistry is awarded jointly to Robert J. Lefkowitz, M.D., a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator and James B. Duke Professor 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•SRES 615 ATS 

of Medicine and Biochemistry at Duke University Medical Center in Durham, North Carolina, and Brian K. 

Kobilka, M.D., Professor and Chair of Molecular and 

Cellular Physiology at the Stanford University School of 

Medicine in Stanford, California, for their studies on Gprotein-coupled receptors; 

Whereas G-protein-coupled receptors are a class of cell surface receptors that catch chemical signals from the outside and transmit their messages into the cell, providing 

the cell with information about changes occurring within 

the body; 

Whereas the studies completed by Robert J. Lefkowitz, M.D., 

and Brian K. Kobilka, M.D., have significantly advanced 

our scientific understanding of G-protein-coupled receptors and their functions; 

Whereas the groundbreaking discoveries made by Robert J. 

Lefkowitz, M.D., and Brian K. Kobilka, M.D., have made 

it possible to target and treat diseases more precisely and 

effectively, as nearly half of all medicines used in the 

world are aimed at G-protein-coupled receptors; 

Whereas the National Institutes of Health supported the 

work done by Robert J. Lefkowitz, M.D., and Brian K. 

Kobilka, M.D., through research grants with the goal of 

advancing scientific knowledge and improving public 

health; and 

Whereas the accomplishments and discoveries of Robert J. 

Lefkowitz, M.D., and Brian K. Kobilka, M.D., are significant achievements in the field of scientific and medical research and further promote the United States as 

a world leader in science: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with 
3 

•SRES 615 ATS 

1 (1) congratulates the recipients of the 2012 

2 Nobel Prize in Chemistry, which is awarded for their 

3 outstanding scientific achievements and discoveries; 

4 and 

5 (2) recognizes Duke University Medical Center 

6 in Durham, North Carolina, and the Stanford Uni7 versity School of Medicine in Stanford, California for 

8 their leadership role in advancing medical research. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with
ex10-1.htm




Exhibit 10.1


 


 





 




  





1











  









 




  





2











  









 




  





3











  






 





 




  





4











  






 





 




  





5











  






 





 




  





6











  






 







  





7











  






 







  





8
# C_2017356EN.01002402.xml

| 21.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 356/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 356/24

---

Corrigendum to notice concerning the anti-dumping measures in force on imports into the Union of ceramic tableware and kitchenware originating in the People’s Republic of China: change of the name of a company subject to the anti-dumping duty rate for cooperating non-sampled companies

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 204 of 28 June 2017
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 204 of 28 June 2017

(2017/C 356/12)

On page 8, table:

for:

for:

‘Fujian Jiashun Art&Crafts Co., Ltd’,

read:

read:

‘Fujian Jiashun Arts&Crafts Corp. LTD’;

On page 8, last paragraph:

for:

for:

‘Fujian Jiashun Art&Crafts Co., Ltd’,

read:

read:

‘Fujian Jiashun Arts&Crafts Corp. LTD’.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Railroad Retirement Board

# TIME AND DATE: 

10:00 a.m., June 8, 2022.

# PLACE: 

                        Members of the public wishing to attend the meeting must submit a written request at least 24 hours prior to the meeting to receive dial-in information. All requests must be sent to                         *SecretarytotheBoard@rrb.gov.*

# STATUS: 

This meeting will be open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

 

1. SCOTUS Update

2. Disposition of Current Matters with Two Concurring Votes

3. FY 22 Hiring Progress

4. Legislative Report from Office of Legislative Affairs

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Stephanie Hillyard, Secretary to the Board, (312) 751-4920.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated: May 26, 2022.

Stephanie Hillyard,

Secretary to the Board.

[FR Doc. 2022-11793 Filed 5-27-22; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7905-01-P
Tracey SMITH-KILPATRICK, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7599.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.