alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Robert Joseph KING, Petitioner v. Robert R. NEALL, Secretary, Maryland Department of Health, et al.

No. 18-9689

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Cornell D. REYNOLDS, Petitioner v. Randall HEPP, Warden

No. 18-8818

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Kenneth Roshaun REID, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA.

No. 18-5452.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
aaxv8kx102_532012.htm


 


EXHIBIT 10.2












Accelerated Venture Partners, LLC


1840 Gateway Drive, Suite 200


Foster City, CA 94404


 







May 3, 2012







PyroTec, Inc.


1840 Gateway Drive, Suite 200


Foster City, CA 94404












Re:           Tender of shares for cancellation







Gentlemen:







By this letter, the undersigned tenders for cancellation 3,500,000 of the 5,000,000 shares of common stock par value $0.0001 of PyroTec, Inc. (the “Company”) which it holds.  Following the cancellation of such shares Accelerated Venture Partners, LLC will hold a total of 1,500,000 of the Company’s Common Shares.







Sincerely,







ACCELERATED VENTURE PARTNERS, LLC

















By:  /s/ Timothy Neher_


       Timothy Neher, Managing Member
George Edward TUSTIN, Jr., Petitioner v. Brad LIVINGSTON, et al.

No. 18-9647

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EX-10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 
 AMENDMENT NO. 3 
 TO 

THE PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION 
 2003 DIRECTORS EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 
 The Progressive Corporation
2003 Directors Equity Incentive Plan, as previously amended (the “Plan”), is hereby amended as follows: 
 1. The
second sentence of the first paragraph of Section 2 of the Plan is hereby deleted, and the following is substituted in its place: 
 “The Committee shall consist of not less than two directors of the Company, all of whom shall be Non-Employee Directors.” 

2. Except as expressly modified hereby, the terms of the Plan shall be unchanged. 

This Amendment will be effective as of April 20, 2012. 

 

	
	 /s/ Charles E. Jarrett

	Charles E. Jarrett
	Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
registrant's unaudited consolidated financial statements for the three month
period ended September 30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
those financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CURRENCY>                      U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  JUL-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                          11,031,228
<SECURITIES>                                     3,218,836
<RECEIVABLES>                                      795,081
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,788,366
<PP&E>                                           2,503,854
<DEPRECIATION>                                     981,464
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,013,840
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,782,949
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                          7,309
<COMMON>                                           100,230
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,123,352
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,013,840
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   855,081
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,162,172
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2,280
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,222,079)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,222,079)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,222,079)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.27)



</TABLE>
has

By BelindaSaenz at 4:21 pm, Dec 18, 2023

Case 4:23-cv-00911-SDJ Document 18 Filed 01/03/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 141
12/18/2023

Case 4:23-cv-00911-SDJ Document 18 Filed 01/03/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 142
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on January 3, 2024, I electronically filed the foregoing APPROVED 

APPLICATION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system 

which will send notification of such filing and effectuate service to all counsel of record in this 

matter. 

 ALSTON & BIRD LLP 

/s/ David B. Carpenter

David B. Carpenter 

Georgia Bar No. 292101 

ALSTON & BIRD LLP 

1201 West Peachtree Street 

Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3424 

Telephone: 404-881-7000 

Facsimile: 404-881-7777 

david.carpenter@alston.com 

 Counsel for Defendant Globe Life, Inc.

Case 4:23-cv-00911-SDJ Document 18 Filed 01/03/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 143
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    The Quarterly Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: November 21, 2005
    By /s/ Eric H. PaulsonEric H. PaulsonChairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
GRAND TRUNK WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Steven R. LILLY.

No. 19-960

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

JIMMIE JALEN HUMPHRIES

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NUMBER 4:23-CR-00260

ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY

The Court referred this matter to the United States Magistrate Judge for administration of 

a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a 

hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court accept 

Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment.

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings.

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of 

the United States Magistrate Judge. The court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance 

of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report.

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Jimmie Jalen 

Humphries GUILTY of Count One of the Indictment, charging a violation of Title 21 U.S.C. § 

841(a)(1) - Possession with Intent to Distribute Fentanyl.

Case 4:23-cr-00260-SDJ-AGD Document 26 Filed 08/26/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 65
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

ERIC DRAY BOOKER 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NUMBER 6:23-CR-00071-JDK 

ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S 

REPORT AND FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY 

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable John D. Love, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed 

by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate 

Judge recommended that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant 

guilty on Count One of the Indictment. 

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings. 

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea 

of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers 

acceptance of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Eric Dray 

Booker GUILTY of Count One of the Indictment, charging a violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 

922(g)(1) - Felon in Possession of a Firearm. 

Signed this

Oct 4, 2023

Case 6:23-cr-00071-JDK-JDL Document 26 Filed 10/04/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 65
Cornelius Lorenzo WILSON, Petitioner, v. Dennis GRIMES, et al.

No. 19-6148

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Thomas FLORENCE, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-7625.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 15, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0226

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

BRADLEY JAY HILLIOUS,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including March 29, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 27 2024

02/27/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0226
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 02/12/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      696,618
COMMITMENTS
  78,748   49,979  191,627  402,750  432,583  673,126  674,189   23,492   22,429

CHANGES FROM 02/05/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     12,706)
   5,927   -2,462   -3,514    9,283   17,341   11,696   11,365    1,010    1,341

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    11.3      7.2     27.5     57.8     62.1     96.6     96.8      3.4      3.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      153)
      44       34       62       64       65      139      135
```

----

Updated February 15, 2013
**UN PUBLISHED**  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 4973** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. DANIEL LOZANO

- GARCIA, a/k/a Daniel Garcia Lozano , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Spartanburg
. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 7:11

- cr - 00334

- HMH

- 1 )

Submitted : June 29, 2012 Decided: July 13, 2012

Before MOTZ and SHEDD , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Lora E. Collins, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellant. William N. Nettles, United States Attorney, Maxwell Cauthen, Assis tant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Daniel Lozano

- Garcia appeals from his fifty

- month sentence imposed pursuant to his guilty plea to illega l reentry by a deported felon. On appeal, Lozano

- Garcia contends that the district court did not provide sufficient individualized reasoning to support his Guidelines sentence. We affirm. Because trial counsel argued at sentencing for a lower
sentence than the one Lozano

- Garcia received , this issue is preserved on appeal. United States v. Lynn , 592 F.3d 572, 578 (4th Cir. 2010)
. We therefore review under an abuse of discretion standard
. Id. at 581 (“ [W] e review the district court’s sentencing procedu re for abuse of discretion, and must reverse if we find error, unless we can conclude that the error was harmless
. ”). We conclude that the district court’s reasoning was “adequate to permit ‘meaningful appellate review.’” United
States v. Cart er , 564 F.3 d 325, 329 (4th Cir. 2009). The court explicitly addressed the basis proffered by Lozano

- Garcia for a lower sentence and explained its reasons for selecting a sentence in the middle of the Guidelines range. Specifically, the court discussed the length of Lozano

- Garcia’s illegal residence in the United States as well as the crimes he committed during that time. Moreover, the court noted that a Guidelines sentence was appropriate and rejected Lozano

- Garcia’s3 assertion that his life in Mexico and his recogn ition of the seriousness of the trouble he was in were sufficient to keep him in Mexico. See id. at 328 ( holding that a district judge must state in open court the particular reasons for a sentence in order to satisfy the appellate court that he considere d the parties’ arguments and that he exercise d sound authority in selecting a sentence). We conclude that Lozano

- Garcia has not demonstrated an abuse of discretion, and his sentence was therefore not procedurally unreasonable. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Eastern District of Texas

Case Number: 2:24-CV-00046-JRG-RSP

Plaintiff:

Display Technologies, LLC

vs.

Defendant:

Wondershare Technology Group Co LTD

For:

Garteiser Honea, PLLC

119 W. Ferguson St.

Tyler. TX 75702

Received by Candace Faye Humphreys on the 22nd day of March, 2024 at 5:29 pm to be served on Wondershare

Technology Group Co Ltd by serving through the Texas Secretary of State, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin, Travis

County, TX 78701.

Candace Faye Humphreys, being duiy s\A^orn, depose and say that on the 25th day of March, 2024 at 3:08 pm, 1:

executed to the SECRETARY OF STATE by delivering in dupiicate a true copy of the Summons in a Civil Action and

Complaint with the date of delivery endorsed thereon by me, to: Minerva Barnhart at 1019 Brazos Street, Austin,

Travis County, TX 78701, as the designated agent for the Texas Secretary of State to accept delivery of process on

behalf of Wondershare Technology Group Co Ltd. An administrative fee of $55.00 was also tendered.

certify that am over the age of 18, have no interest in the above action, and am a certified process server, in good

standing, in the judicial circuit in which the foregoing occurred. The facts in this affidavit are within my personal knowledge

and are true and correct.

n

2#" Candace Faye Humphreys

PSC-23879, Exp. 2I2QI2026 n the

by the affiant

Date-£0iJJlpZo2J\

Malone Process Service, LLC

P.O.Box 720040

Dallas, TX 75372

(877) 997-3783

NICaEM.WADE

'^V\ My Notary ID #129086987 ExpiresAugusl9,2024 Our Job Serial Number: ATX-2024003795

Ref: Display Technologies v Wondershare

Copyright © 1992-2024 DreamBuill Software, Inc. - Process Server's Toolbox VS,2m

Case 2:24-cv-00046-JRG-RSP Document 8 Filed 04/04/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 102
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

AARON WADE SMITH, #1703605

VS. 

DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:23cv1114

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

The above-entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate 

Judge Kimberly C. Priest Johnson, who issued a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. #19) 

concluding that Petitioner’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. #17) should be denied without 

prejudice. No objections were timely filed.

The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains proposed findings of fact and 

recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration. The 

Court concludes that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, 

the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and 

conclusions of the Court. 

It is accordingly ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. #17) is 

DENIED without prejudice.

Case 4:23-cv-01114-ALM-KPJ Document 23 Filed 06/24/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 44
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of DT
Industries, Inc. (the "Company") and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
hereby certify that:

      (i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the
fiscal year ended June 29, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
another document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its Staff upon request.


                Dated:   October 14, 2003         /s/  Stephen J. Perkins
                                              -------------------------------
                                              Stephen J. Perkins
                                              Chief Executive Officer



                                                  /s/  John M. Casper
                                              -------------------------------
                                              John M. Casper
                                              Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of
Principal Executive OfficerPursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Carl Spana, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Palatin Technologies, Inc., hereby certify, to my knowledge, that the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008 of Palatin
Technologies, Inc. (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Palatin Technologies, Inc.

Dated: February 13, 2009

|                                                                                        | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Carl Spana                                                                          | 
|Carl Spana, President and Chief Executive Officer
        (Principal Executive Officer) |
DM

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0079

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CODY R. SACKS,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 60-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time 

to and including April 8, 2021, within which to prepare, serve, and file its response 

brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 28 2021

01/28/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0079
Dino CONSTANCE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON.

No. 19-7380.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HANSHOW TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. AND 

SHANGHAI HANSHI INFORMATION 

TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.

Plaintiffs,

v.

SES-IMAGOTAG SA, SES-IMAGOTAG 

GMBH AND CAPTANA GMBH

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00617

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FOR BOYD CLOERN

Plaintiffs Hanshow Technology Co., Ltd and Shanghai Hanshi Information Technology 

Co., Ltd file this Notice of Appearance and hereby notify the Court that Boyd Cloern of Steptoe 

LLP, 1330 Connecticut Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20036, is appearing on behalf of 

Hanshow Technology Co., Ltd and Shanghai Hanshi Information Technology Co., Ltd in the 

above referenced matter.

 Respectfully submitted,

 Boyd Cloern

Dated: April 17, 2024 By: /s/ Boyd Cloern

Boyd Cloern

DC Bar No. 471829

STEPTOE LLP

1330 Connecticut Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20036

Email: bcloern@steptoe.com

Telephone: (202) 429-6230

Facsimile: (202) 429-3902

Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 25 Filed 04/17/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 340
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that all counsel of record are being served with a copy of this document 

via ECF, as authorized by E. DIST. TEX. LOC. CT. R. CV-5(d), on this 17th day of April, 2024

/s/ Boyd Cloern

Boyd Cloern

Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 25 Filed 04/17/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 341
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Marcy Lena Mejia, Appellant

No. 06-12-00210-CR v.

State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 336th District Court of 

Fannin County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CR-12-

24506). Opinion delivered by Chief Justice 

Morriss, Justice Carter and Justice Moseley

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed 

for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We further order that the appellant, Marcy Lena Mejia, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED MAY 17, 2013

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
ARIZONA, Petitioner, v. Hector Sebastion NUNEZ-DIAZ.

No. 19-645.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arizona denied.
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 9 Filed 09/28/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 336
Nicole Rena MCCREA, Petitioner v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICE OF HUMAN RIGHTS, et al.

No. 19-7389

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals dismissed. See Rule 39.8.