alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Lakesha SMITH, Petitioner, v. ST. JOSEPH'S/CANDLER HEALTH SYSTEM, INC.;

No. 19-6794.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      45,204,000
<SECURITIES>                                36,496,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               66,833,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (5,328,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,204,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           217,068,000
<PP&E>                                     892,428,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (96,943,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,157,753,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      122,583,000
<BONDS>                                  1,053,608,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       65,603,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   241,198,000
<OTHER-SE>                               (462,973,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,157,753,000
<SALES>                                    252,922,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           252,922,000
<CGS>                                      161,877,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              319,484,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          (34,926,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          84,058,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (115,694,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (115,694,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                             (115,694,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.22)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED APRIL 30, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                         139,635
<SECURITIES>                                   755,123
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,818,109
<ALLOWANCES>                                    37,863
<INVENTORY>                                  2,494,743<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,228,290
<PP&E>                                       5,223,424<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                 936,768
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,252,901
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,922,406
<BONDS>                                      2,845,276
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      6,221
<COMMON>                                        55,543
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,157,505
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,252,901
<SALES>                                     12,902,491
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,902,491
<CGS>                                       10,557,688
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,641,943
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               366,437
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             687,095
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,350,672)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (55,607)<F3>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,295,065)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,295,065)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.41)
<FN>
<F1>See Footnote 2 to Financial Statements.
<F2>See Footnote 3 to Financial Statements.
<F3>See Footnote 7 to Financial Statements.
</FN>
        




</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 Exhibit 32 DIVERSIFIED OPPORTUNITIES, INC. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Diversified Opportunities, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin Russeth, Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: September 23, 2008/s/ Kevin RussethKevin RussethChief Executive Officer and principal financial officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Avalon
Oil & Gas, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kent Rodriguez, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                    
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Date: October 31, 2014 | By: | /s/ Kent Rodriguez                                                                    | 
|---------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                       |     | Kent Rodriguez                                                                        | 
|                       |     | Chief Executive Officer, President,
        Secretary and Principal Financial Officer |
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 43 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR CEREMONY 

4 HONORING NELSON MANDELA. 

5 Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center is 

6 authorized to be used on July 18, 2013, for a ceremony 

7 honoring the life and legacy of Nelson Mandela on the 
2 

•HCON 43 EH 

1 occasion of the 95th anniversary of his birth. Physical 

2 preparations for the ceremony shall be carried out in ac3 cordance with such conditions as the Architect of the Cap4 itol may prescribe. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 9, 2013. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 43 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the 

casion of the 95th anniversary of his birth. the life and legacy of Nelson Mandela on the ocCapitol Visitor Center for a ceremony honoring
Circuit Court for Baltimore County 

Case No. 03-C-15-008544 

Argued: October 31, 2019 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

OF MARYLAND 

No. 27 

September Term, 2019 

 

BETTYE JEAN MCFARLAND 

v. 

BALTIMORE COMMUNITY LENDING, 

INC. 

 

 Barbera, C.J., 

McDonald 

 Watts 

 Hotten 

 Booth 

Harrell, Glenn T., Jr. 

(Senior Judge, Specially Assigned) 

Greene, Clayton, Jr. 

(Senior Judge, Specially Assigned) 

 JJ. 

 

PER CURIAM ORDER 

McDonald, J., concurs. 

 

Filed: February 28, 2020
BETTYE JEAN MCFARLAND * IN THE 

 * COURT OF APPEALS 

 * OF MARYLAND 

 v. 

 * COA-REG-0027-2019 

 * No. 27 

BALTIMORE COMMUNITY 

LENDING, INC. * September Term, 2019 

 

PER CURIAM ORDER

The petition for writ of certiorari in the above-entitled case having been granted and 

argued, it is this 28th day of February, 2020, 

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the writ of certiorari be, and 

it is hereby, dismissed with costs, the petition having been improvidently granted. 

 /s/ Mary Ellen Barbera 

 Chief Judge 
Circuit Court for Baltimore County 

Case No. 03-C-15-008544 

Argued: October 31, 2019 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

OF MARYLAND 

No. 27 

SEPTEMBER TERM, 2019 

 

BETTYE JEAN MCFARLAND 

v. 

BALTIMORE COMMUNITY LENDING, 

INC. 

 

 Barbera, C.J., 

McDonald 

 Watts 

 Hotten 

 Booth 

Harrell, Glenn T., Jr. 

(Senior Judge, Specially Assigned) 

Greene, Clayton, Jr. 

(Senior Judge, Specially Assigned) 

 JJ. 

 

Concurring Opinion by McDonald, J. 

 

Filed: February 28, 2020
 I agree with the Court’s decision to dismiss the petition in this case as improvidently 

granted. See Sturdivant v. Md. Dep’t of Health & Mental Hygiene, 436 Md. 584, 589 

(2014). I write simply to point out that neither this Court nor the Court of Special Appeals 

has yet to determine, in the context of a joint bank account, whether to adopt a “full 

ownership” or “equal shares” presumption concerning ownership of the funds in such an 

account. See Morgan Stanley & Co. v. Andrews, 225 Md. App. 181, 192 n.9 (2015) (“[W]e 

need not determine precisely which type of presumption of ownership is appropriate under 

Maryland law.”). Perhaps a different case will present an opportunity for this Court to 

provide clarity on this important question.
Jonathan CRUZ-RAMIREZ, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-7089

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petitions for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                            <C>
PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              SEP-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                      22
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             22
<PP&E>                                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               22
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        373
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                     143
<OTHER-SE>                                  (351)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 22
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              0
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              184
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (184)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (184)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (184)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.01)


23



1


14



</TABLE>
# C_2017045EN.01000601.xml

| 11.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/6

---

Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for 28 Member States applicable as from 1 March 2017

(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1))

(2017/C 45/06)

Base rates calculated in accordance with the communication from the Commission on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates (OJ C 14, 19.1.2008, p. 6.). Depending on the use of the reference rate, the appropriate margins have still to be added as defined in this communication. For the discount rate this means that a margin of 100 basis points has to be added. The Commission Regulation (EC) No 271/2008 of 30 January 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 foresees that, unless otherwise provided for in a specific decision, the recovery rate will also be calculated by adding 100 basis points to the base rate.

Modified rates are indicated in bold.

Previous table published in OJ C 3, 6.1.2017, p. 4.

| From | To | AT | BE | BG | CY | CZ | DE | DK | EE | EL | ES | FI | FR | HR | HU | IE | IT | LT | LU | LV | MT | NL | PL | PT | RO | SE | SI | SK | UK |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.3.2017 | ... | -0,08 | -0,08 | 0,76 | -0,08 | 0,45 | -0,08 | 0,16 | -0,08 | -0,08 | -0,08 | -0,08 | -0,08 | 1,05 | 0,53 | -0,08 | -0,08 | -0,08 | -0,08 | -0,08 | -0,08 | -0,08 | 1,83 | -0,08 | 1,10 | -0,36 | -0,08 | -0,08 | 0,78 |
| 1.1.2017 | 28.2.2017 | -0,07 | -0,07 | 0,76 | -0,07 | 0,45 | -0,07 | 0,16 | -0,07 | -0,07 | -0,07 | -0,07 | -0,07 | 1,05 | 0,75 | -0,07 | -0,07 | -0,07 | -0,07 | -0,07 | -0,07 | -0,07 | 1,83 | -0,07 | 1,10 | -0,36 | -0,07 | -0,07 | 0,78 |

From

To

AT

BE

BG

CY

CZ

DE

DK

EE

EL

ES

FI

FR

HR

HU

IE

IT

LT

LU

LV

MT

NL

PL

PT

RO

SE

SI

SK

UK

1.3.2017

...

-0,08

-0,08

-0,08

-0,08

0,76

-0,08

-0,08

0,45

-0,08

-0,08

0,16

-0,08

-0,08

-0,08

-0,08

-0,08

-0,08

-0,08

-0,08

-0,08

-0,08

1,05

0,53

0,53

-0,08

-0,08

-0,08

-0,08

-0,08

-0,08

-0,08

-0,08

-0,08

-0,08

-0,08

-0,08

-0,08

-0,08

1,83

-0,08

-0,08

1,10

-0,36

-0,08

-0,08

-0,08

-0,08

0,78

1.1.2017

28.2.2017

-0,07

-0,07

-0,07

-0,07

0,76

0,76

-0,07

-0,07

0,45

0,45

-0,07

-0,07

0,16

0,16

-0,07

-0,07

-0,07

-0,07

-0,07

-0,07

-0,07

-0,07

-0,07

-0,07

1,05

1,05

0,75

0,75

-0,07

-0,07

-0,07

-0,07

-0,07

-0,07

-0,07

-0,07

-0,07

-0,07

-0,07

-0,07

-0,07

-0,07

1,83

1,83

-0,07

-0,07

1,10

1,10

-0,36

-0,36

-0,07

-0,07

-0,07

-0,07

0,78

0,78

---
Terry GAY, Petitioner, v. Shawn FOSTER, Warden, et al.

No. 19-7816.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Martavious Detrel Banks KEYS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6824.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 124 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.124
                                     Agreed to December 16, 2014        

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill, H.R. 5771, the Clerk of the House 
shall amend subsection (a) of section 1 of Division B (relating to 
Achieving a Better Life Experience Act of 2014) to read as follows:
    ``(a) Short Title.--This division may be cited as the `Stephen 
Beck, Jr., Achieving a Better Life Experience Act of 2014' or the 
`Stephen Beck, Jr., ABLE Act of 2014'.''.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
Matthew HERRICK, Petitioner, v. GRINDR LLC, et al.

No. 19-192

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Form of Restricted Stock Award



 Exhibit 10.7 
 [Date] 
 [Name] 
 Global ID Number: XXX-XX-[XXX] 
 Dear [Name]: 

Effective [Date], the Board of Directors of Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) awarded you the following Restricted Stock at a grant
value of $X.XX per share upon the terms set forth below: 
  

			
	Type of Grant:	  	Restricted Stock
	Number of Shares:	  	[# of shares]
	Vesting Schedule:	  	Vesting schedule

 This Restricted Stock Award (this “Award”) has been granted pursuant to, and is controlled by: (i) the
Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. Inducement Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); (ii) the Restricted Stock Terms and Conditions (the “Plan Terms”); and (iii) this Award. This Award shall vest as set forth above. The Plan and the
Plan Terms are incorporated into this Award as if fully set forth herein. 
 In accordance with IRS regulations, you may choose to be taxed on
the value of the Restricted Stock at this time, by making a Section 83(b) election. PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION REGARDING A SECTION 83(b) ELECTION: 
  

	 	•	 	 The election form MUST BE FILED WITH THE COMPANY AND THE IRS NO LATER THAN 30 days after the effective date of the grant. 



 

	 	•	 	 The holding period begins on the grant date. 


  

	 	•	 	 Withholding taxes MUST BE PAID to the Company at the time of the election. 



 

	 	•	 	 Additional gain (or loss) is recognized when the stock is sold – not when the restriction lapses. 



 

	 	•	 	 The 83(b) election form, tax calculator and administrative procedures can be found on the Stock Administration web-site described below.



  

	 	•	 	 Please consult your own tax advisor for your individual tax situation. 



All documents relating to this award are available for viewing and printing on the Human Resources Department Website. To access this information, please
go to MyNet, select Directory, Site Directory, Human Resources, Stock Administration. In addition to the 83(b) election information, the documents available for viewing and printing at this website location are the Plan, the Plan Terms, the most
recent Plan Prospectus, the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and the Company’s Insider Trading Policy. If you choose not to download these documents, if you do not have access to MyNet or if you encounter problems accessing
this site, please contact Stock Administration at (949) 579-4525 or stock.admin@mindspeed.com to receive paper copies of these documents at no cost. Please read all documents carefully. 

If you have any questions regarding this grant, please contact Stock Administration at (949) 579-4525 or via email at stock.admin@mindspeed.com.

 MINDSPEED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
John Anthony ARNOLD, Petitioner, v. VIRGINIA.

No. 19-7282.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

MANDY KEEN, 

Plaintiff,

v.

ONPOINT INDUSTRIAL SERVICES,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-374-MAC-CLS

ORDER ADOPTING

THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Mandy Keen, proceeding pro se, brought this lawsuit alleging claims under the 

Fair Labor Standards Act, and claims for negligence and retaliation against Defendant. [Dkt. 1]

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States Magistrate 

Judge, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. On December 4, 

2023, the magistrate judge entered a Report and Recommendation [Dkt. 5] in which she 

recommended that this case be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure. To date, no objections have been filed. 

The Court received and considered the Report and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings, and all available 

evidence. After careful review, the Court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of 

the United States Magistrate Judge are correct. 

Case 1:23-cv-00374-MAC-CLS Document 7 Filed 01/03/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 21
Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge 

[Dkt. 5] is ADOPTED. It is ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 

All pending motions are hereby DENIED.

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 3rd day of January, 2024.

Case 1:23-cv-00374-MAC-CLS Document 7 Filed 01/03/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 22
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>
                                  Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Environmental  Service
Professionals,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,
2009 (the "Report") I, Edward L. Torres,  Chief Executive  Officer and President
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated:    August 14, 2009


/s/ Edward L. Torres
-------------------------------------------------------
Edward L. Torres, Chief Executive Officer and President

         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.