alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-20004

Summary Calendar

EDWARD PAUL CELESTINE,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division

No. 4:11-CV-03376

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff-appellant Edward Paul Celestine, Jr., appeals the district court’s

order granting defendant-appellee’s motion to dismiss Mr. Celestine’s complaint

for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On March 11, 2011, the Commissioner of

the Social Security Administration informed Mr. Celestine that his Social

Security Income benefits would cease effective April 1, 2011. Mr. Celestine

sought reconsideration, and the agency affirmed its initial determination. Mr.

Celestine then sought a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge, but

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 15, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 12-20004 Document: 00511957513 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/15/2012
No. 12-20004

subsequently withdrew that request. On September 13, 2011, he commenced a

civil action in the district court. 

A claimant may only obtain judicial review of a case arising under the

Social Security Act if he has first exhausted all available administrative

remedies. This requires the plaintiff to follow a four-step process that includes 1

an initial determination, reconsideration, a hearing before an Administrative

Law Judge, and review by an Appeals Council. Because Mr. Celestine failed to 2

exhaust these administrative remedies when he withdrew his hearing request,

the district court correctly concluded that it did not have subject-matter

jurisdiction over this case. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district

court.

See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (allowing an individual to obtain judicial review of “any final 1

decision of the Commissioner of Social Security”) (emphasis added); see also Heckler v. Ringer,

466 U.S. 602, 617-18 (1984).

See 20 C.F.R. § 416.1400(a) (explaining that a decision by the Social Security

2

Administrative only becomes final once the four-step process has been completed); see also

Weinberger v. Salfi, 422 U.S. 749, 767 (1975); Califano v. Sanders, 430 U.S. 99, 108 (1977).

2

Case: 12-20004 Document: 00511957513 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/15/2012
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER PARTNERS II LLC,

Plaintiff, 

v.

T-MOBILE US, INC. et al. and SPRINT

CORP.,

Defendants. 

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-cv-00015-JRG-RSP

(Lead Case)

ORDER

Before the Court is the Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Proposed Discovery 

Order and Protective Order filed by Plaintiff Headwater Partners II LLC and Defendants TMobile USA, Inc., Sprint LLC, AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC and AT&T Corp.. 

Dkt. No. 44. After consideration, and noting its joint nature, the Motion is GRANTED. It is 

ORDERED that the deadline for the parties’ to file a proposed Protective Order and 

a proposed Discovery Order is April 25, 2024. 

Case 2:24-cv-00015-JRG-RSP Document 45 Filed 04/17/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 370
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF REGISTERED INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The
Board of Directors and Stockholders

Wave
Systems Corp.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements Nos. 333-150340, 333-141429, 333-130409, 333-114476,
333-112017, 333-106632, 333-99469, 333-92845, 333-46330, 333-33236, 333-38265, 333-28819,
333-20017, 333-73236 and 333-65648 on Form S-3 and Nos. 333-164320, 333-125203, 333-144147,
333-144139, 333-88665, 333-68911, 333-69041, 333-11611 and 333-11609 on Form S-8 of Wave Systems Corporation,
of our report dated March 15, 2011, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Wave Systems Corp. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2010, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, which report appears in the
December 31, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K of Wave Systems Corp.

Our
report dated March 15, 2011 contains an explanatory paragraph that states that Wave Systems Corp. has suffered recurring losses from operations and has an accumulated deficit
that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
uncertainty.

/s/
KPMG LLP

Boston,
Massachusetts
March 15, 2011

---



QuickLinks
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council

          - [Docket No. AS22-04]

# AGENCY:

Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

*Description:*                     In accordance with Section 1104 (b) of Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee (ASC) will meet in open session for its regular meeting:                

*Location:*                     This will be a virtual meeting via Zoom. Please visit the agency's homepage (                    *www.asc.gov*) and access the provided registration link in the What's New box. You MUST register in advance to attend this Meeting.                

*Date:*                     June 8, 2022.                

*Time:*                     10:00 a.m. ET.                

*Status:*                     Open.                

## Reports

Chair

Executive Director

Grants Report

Financial Report

Notation Vote

## Action and Discussion Items

Approval of Minutes

March 9, 2022 Quarterly Meeting Minutes

Appraiser Census/Survey

Budget Amendment

## How To Attend and Observe an ASC Meeting

                    The meeting will be open to the public via live webcast only. Visit the agency's homepage (                    *www.asc.gov*) and access the provided registration link in the What's New box. The meeting space is intended to accommodate public attendees. However, if the space will not accommodate all requests, the ASC may refuse attendance on that reasonable basis. The use of any video or audio tape recording device, photographing device, or any other electronic or mechanical device designed for similar purposes is prohibited at ASC Meetings.                

James R. Park,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 2022-11700 Filed 5-31-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6700-01-P
Exhibit 10.7


FIRST AMENDMENT


TO THE 


RUDDICK CORPORATION KEY EMPLOYEE LIFE INSURANCE
PLAN


 


 


By the authority granted
the undersigned officer of Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc. (f/k/a Ruddick Corporation), this First Amendment to the Ruddick Corporation
Key Employee Life Insurance Plan (“Plan”) is hereby adopted and approved as follows:


 


	1. 		The introductory paragraph of the Plan shall be amended and restated in its entirety
as follows: 



 


The Harris Teeter
Supermarkets, Inc. Key Employee Life Insurance Plan (f/k/a Ruddick Corporation Key Employee Life Insurance Plan) was established
to provide certain key employees of Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc. (f/k/a Ruddick Corporation) and other participating companies
with life insurance and other benefits in place of the group term life insurance provided to other employees of Harris Teeter Supermarkets,
Inc. and other participating companies.


 


	2. 		Section 1.01 of the Plan shall be amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 



 


1.01Title.
 This Plan shall be known as the Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc. Key Employee Life Insurance Plan.


 


	3. 		Section 2.08 of the Plan shall be amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 



 


2.08“Company”
means Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc. (f/k/a Ruddick Corporation), a North Carolina corporation, and any successor to Harris Teeter
Supermarkets, Inc.


 


	4. 		Section 2.18 of the Plan shall be amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 



 


2.18“Plan”
means the Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc. Key Employee Life Insurance Plan (f/k/a the Ruddick Corporation Key Employee Life Insurance
Plan) as contained herein, and as may be amended from time to time hereafter.


 


	5. 		The first paragraph of Section 3.01 of the Plan shall be amended and restated in
its entirety as follows: 



 


The eligibility
rules for determining participation in the Plan have been established by the Company, Harris Teeter, and American & Efird.
After meeting the specific eligibility criteria below, and upon approval by the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc., an Employee will become eligible for participation in the Plan.









IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, this First Amendment to the Ruddick Corporation Key Employee Life Insurance Plan
is adopted effective April 2, 2012.


 


HARRIS TEETER SUPERMARKETS, INC.


 


 


By: /S/ JOHN B. WOODLIEF


John B. Woodlief, Executive Vice President 

and Chief Financial
Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

§

ANGELA IBARRA, No. 08-18-00225-CR

§

APPELLANT, Appeal from the

§

V. 409th District Court

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS, of El Paso County, Texas

§

APPELLEE. (TC# 20150D03506)

§

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Angela Ibarra, has filed a motion to dismiss her appeal pursuant to Rule 42.2. 

This rule permits an appellate court to dismiss a criminal appeal on the appellant's motion at any 

time before the court’s decision. TEX.R.APP.P. 42.2(a). Finding that Appellant's motion complies 

with the requirements of Rule 42.2(a), we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

April 24, 2019

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
KENNETH HASEL WANDER, Plaintiff, 

### v. JOHN M. McHUGH, Defendant.

ORDER ) ) ) ) ) Civil Case No. 10-1190 (RJL) ) ) ) )

Forthe reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is this 

### f

# ~fJuly, 2012, hereby ORDEREDthat defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. #11] is GRANTED; it is further ORDEREDthatplaintiffs Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. #17] is DENIED; it is further SO ORDERED.

United States District Judge
Damar D. RUFFIN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7957.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 4, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

DAO HEALTH,

 Plaintiff,

v.

CHIARO TECHNOLOGY LIMITED,

 Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 2:23-CV-00289-JRG-RSP 

ORDER

Before the Court is the Motion to Compel Discovery filed by Defendant Chiaro 

Technology Limited. Dkt. No. 42. The Parties have filed a joint status report indicating that the 

underlying dispute has been resolved. Dkt. No. 56. Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion to Compel 

(Dkt. No. 42) is DENIED AS MOOT.

Case 2:23-cv-00289-JRG-RSP Document 57 Filed 08/12/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 782
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP**

 

BioSphere Medical, Inc. (the “BioSphere”) was unable after reasonable efforts to obtain the written consent ofArthur Andersen LLP (“Andersen”), BioSphere’s former independent public accountants, to incorporate by reference the report of Andersen, dated January 28, 2002, on the financial statements of BioSphere for the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2001. Such report appears herein and in the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by BioSphere with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 29, 2002, as required by Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the“Securities Act”). However, Rule 437a of the Securities Act permits BioSphere to dispense with the requirement to file the written consent of Andersen. As a result, Andersen may not have any liability under Section 11(a) of the SecuritiesAct for any untrue statements of a material fact contained in the financial statements audited by Andersen or any omissions of a material fact required to be stated therein. Accordingly, BioSphere’s stockholders may be unable to assert a claimagainst Andersen under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act.
III 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 14 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 7, 2013 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony as part of the commemoration of the days of 

remembrance of victims of the Holocaust. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF ROTUNDA FOR HOLOCAUST DAYS OF 

4 REMEMBRANCE CEREMONY. 

5 The rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used 

6 on April 11, 2013, for a ceremony as part of the com7 memoration of the days of remembrance of victims of the 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HCON 14 RDS 

1 Holocaust. Physical preparations for the ceremony shall 

2 be carried out in accordance with such conditions as the 

3 Architect of the Capitol may prescribe. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 6, 

2013. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Dale E. PHILLIPS, Petitioner, v. SOUTH COAST PLAZA, et al.

No. 19-7829.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 4, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# C_2017436EN.01000601.xml

| 16.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 436/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 436/6

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2017/C 436/09)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 6.11.2017 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 6.11.2017-31.12.2017 |
| Member State | France |
| Stock or Group of stocks | LIN/1/2. |
| Species | Ling (Molva molva) |
| Zone | Union and international waters of I and II |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 40/TQ127 |

Date and time of closure

6.11.2017

Duration

6.11.2017-31.12.2017

Member State

France

Stock or Group of stocks

LIN/1/2.

Species

Ling (Molva molva)

Molva molva

Zone

Union and international waters of I and II

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

40/TQ127

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
John Loveman REESE, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-9267

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
# C_2017169EN.01000501.xml

| 30.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 169/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 169/5

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo apply

(2017/C 169/06)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 (2).

2

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (3).

3

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 193, 23.7.2005, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

3

---
Case 6:24-cv-00033-JCB-KNM Document 39 Filed 10/05/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:

410
James Dwayne MYERS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6720.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 30, 2021

a0623 

# Order

Clerk June 30, 2021

162692

BUDDY A. LEWIS, SR., Deceased,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 162692

COA: 350247

MCAC: 18

- 000008

LEXAMAR CORP., ZURICH AMERICAN

INSURANCE CO., and GALLAGHER

BASSETT SERVICES,

Defendants

- Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 17, 2020

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral

argument on the application. MCR 7.305(H)(1).

The appellant shall file a supplemental brief addressing whether the appellant’s

injuries arose out of and in the course of his employm ent with appellee LexaMar Corp.

such that LexaMar Corp. is required to pay compensation under MCL 418.301(1). See

Smith v Chrysler Group, LLC , 331 Mich App 492, 497

- 498 (2020); Larson, Workers’

Compensation Law § 27.03(1)(c)(2019). The appellant’s brief shall be filed by October

25, 2021, with no extensions except upon a showing of good cause. In the brief, citations

to the record must provide the appendix page numbers as required by MCR 7.312(B)(1).

The appellees shall file a supplemental brief within 21 days of being served with the

appellant’s brief. A reply, if any, must be filed by the appellant within 14 days of being

served with the appellees’ brief. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their

application papers.

The total time a llowed for oral argument shall be 40 minutes: 20 minutes for the

appellant and 20 minutes for the appellees. MCR 7.314(B)(2).
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 06/25/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       77,294
COMMITMENTS
  24,350    2,741    2,109   46,303   69,879   72,762   74,729    4,532    2,565

CHANGES FROM 06/18/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -24,022)
   2,826     -249     -880  -24,045  -20,043  -22,099  -21,172   -1,923   -2,850

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    31.5      3.5      2.7     59.9     90.4     94.1     96.7      5.9      3.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       76)
      13        5        1       38       35       51       41
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 06/25/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      217,229
COMMITMENTS
  65,117   49,636    1,619  137,410  157,815  204,146  209,070   13,083    8,159

CHANGES FROM 06/18/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -45,763)
  -4,388    7,056     -890  -28,278  -45,067  -33,556  -38,901  -12,207   -6,862

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    30.0     22.8      0.7     63.3     72.6     94.0     96.2      6.0      3.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      159)
      37       23        8       69       56      110       83
```

----

Updated June 28, 2013