alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Retromer Pathogenesis of Alzheimer's Disease.                    

*Date:*                         June 23, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                              ( print page 32436)    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Reymundo Dominguez, Ph.D., Scientific Review Branch, NIA, Bg Gwy, Rm. 2C230, 7201 Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 555-1212,                         *rey.dominguez@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 25, 2022.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-11594 Filed 5-27-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF WASHINGTON,

Respondent.

v.

DOMINIC DAVID WILSON,

Appellant.

No. 85230-2-I

DIVISION ONE

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

PER CURIAM — Dominic Wilson appeals from the judgment and sentence entered 

upon his plea of guilty to one count of murder in the second degree while armed with a 

firearm—an offense he committed at age 16. He argues that the trial court, which 

sentenced Wilson to an adult standard-range sentence above what the parties jointly 

recommended, erred by not giving meaningful consideration to his youth at the time of 

his offense. The State acknowledges that “there is no indication in the record how the 

defendant’s youthfulness impacted the court’s [sentencing] decision.” It thus concedes 

that the matter should be remanded for resentencing. 

We accept the State’s concession. Cf. State v. Houston-Sconiers, 188 Wn.2d 1, 

21, 23, 391 P.3d 409 (2017) (court sentencing juvenile must consider mitigating 

circumstances related to the defendant’s youth; it must also consider factors “like the 

nature of the juvenile’s surrounding environment and family circumstances, the extent of 

the juvenile’s participation in the crime, . . . ‘the way familial and peer pressures may 

have affected him [or her],’ . . . [and] how youth impacted any legal defense, along with 
No. 852302-I/2

-2-

any factors suggesting that the child might be successfully rehabilitated” (second

alteration in original) (quoting Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460, 477-78, 132 S. Ct. 2455, 

183 L. Ed. 2d 407 (2012))). Accordingly, we reverse Wilson’s sentence and remand to 

the trial court for resentencing. Cf. In re Pers. Restraint of Carrasco, 1 Wn.3d 224, 230, 

525 P.3d 196 (2023) (“On direct appeal, the defendant needs only to establish the 

existence of [a] Houston-Sconiers error to be entitled to a new sentencing hearing.”). 

Reversed and remanded.

FOR THE COURT:
IN RE Teon Jamell WILLIAMS, Petitioner.

No. 19-5218.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

         As independent certified public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the following registration statements of our
report dated January 10, 2003 included in Visual Data Corporation's Form 10-KSB
for the year ended September 30, 2002.

         *        Registration statement on Form S-3, SEC file number 333-92064,
                  as declared effective by the Securities and Exchange
                  Commission on August 21, 2002,

         *        Registration statement on Form S-3, SEC file number 333-89042,
                  as declared effective by the Securities and Exchange
                  Commission on June 7, 2002,

         *        Registration statement on Form S-3, SEC file number 333-71308,
                  as declared effective by the Securities and Exchange
                  Commission on November 14, 2001,

         *        Registration statement on Form S-3, SEC file number 333-63792,
                  as declared effective by the Securities and Exchange
                  Commission on July 2, 2001,

         *        Registration statement on Form S-8, SEC file number 333-63822,
                  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
                  on June 25, 2001,

         *        Registration statement on Form S-8, SEC file number 333-64588,
                  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
                  on July 3, 2001 and

         *        Registration statement on Form S-3, SEC file number 333-18819,
                  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
                  on July 30, 2002.


GOLDSTEIN LEWIN & CO.


Boca Raton, Florida,
January 10, 2003
Michael J. MURRAY, Petitioner, v. MAYO CLINIC, et al.

No. 19-995.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Each of the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of QLogic
Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended April 3, 2005 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ H.K. DESAIH.K. DesaiChief Executive Officer/s/ ANTHONY J. MASSETTIAnthony J. MassettiChief Financial OfficerDated: June 9, 2005
 The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, except to the extent that the
Company specifically incorporates it by reference and regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Latray WHITLEY, Petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 19-7414.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
Exhibit 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The  undersigned  officer  hereby  certifies  that,  to his  knowledge,  (1) the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Productivity Technologies Corp. for the quarter
ended  December  31,  2003 as to which this  Certification  is an exhibit  fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934 (15  U.S.C.  78m(a)  or  78o(d))  and (2) the  information
contained  in  such  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material  respects,  the
financial condition and results of operations of Productivity Technologies Corp.

Date: March 11, 2004

/s/ Samuel N. Seidman
--------------------------------
Samuel N. Seidman,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Mark GELAZELA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7916.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 6, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# C_2017220EN.01006001.xml

| 8.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/60

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 220/12)

| Member State | Italy |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Cagliari-Rome Fiumicino and vice versa |
| New period of validity of the contract | A period of 4 years starting on 9 November 2017 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | 9 July 2017 |
| Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained | Reference document


  OJ C 145 of 9 May 2017

  For further information please contact:





  Autonomous Region of Sardinia |
| Department of Transport |
| Directorate-General for Transport |
| Service for Maritime and Air Transport and Territorial Continuity |
| Via XXIX Novembre 1847, 41 |
| 09123 Cagliari |
| ITALIA |
| Tel. +39 0706067331 |
| Fax +39 0706067309 |
| Website: http://www.regione.sardegna.it |
| Email | : | trasporti@pec.regione.sardegna.it
  trasporti@regione.sardegna.it
  trasp.osp@regione.sardegna.it |

Member State

Italy

Route concerned

Cagliari-Rome Fiumicino and vice versa

New period of validity of the contract

A period of 4 years starting on 9 November 2017

Deadline for submission of tenders

9 July 2017

Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained

Reference document

Reference document

OJ C 145 of 9 May 2017

For further information please contact:

Autonomous Region of Sardinia

Department of Transport

Directorate-General for Transport

Service for Maritime and Air Transport and Territorial Continuity

Via XXIX Novembre 1847, 41

09123 Cagliari

ITALIA

Tel. +39 0706067331

Fax +39 0706067309

Website: http://www.regione.sardegna.it

Email

:

trasporti@pec.regione.sardegna.it

trasporti@regione.sardegna.it

trasp.osp@regione.sardegna.it

---
Joseph BALLARD, Petitioner, v. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS

No. 19-5135

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 31.2**

CERTIFICATION

I, Robert S. Whatley, Vice President Finance of J.B. Poindexter &Co., Inc., certify that:

1.             I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-K of J.B. Poindexter & Co., Inc. andsubsidiaries as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006;

2.             Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.             The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a.             designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b.             evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on suchevaluation; and

c.             disclosed in this report any changein the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s control overfinancial reporting; and

5.             The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):

a.             all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.             any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.
| Date:  March 30,  2007 | By     |  /s/ Robert S.  Whatley              |
|----------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|                             |   | Robert S. Whatley, Vice President Finance |

 

----
Juan ORELLANA, Petitioner, v. Raymond MADDEN, Warden.

No. 19-7662.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

February 24, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00004

- CR

Devon Alexander KANE

, Appellant

v.

STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No . A1319

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

The panel has considered the Appellant ’ s Motion for Rehearing, and the motion is

DENIED.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 24th day of February, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Alfred T. MOLIERE, Petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 19-6910

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District denied.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. James Fisher, Relator, *v.*Warden, Penitentiary of the City of New York, Rikers Island, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special and Trial Term, Bronx County,

June 12, 1973.

*Robert Kasanof and Joseph Alan Kaplan*for relator. *Norman Redlich, Corporation Counsel,*for respondent.

*821Joseph P. Sullivan, J.

The writ is sustained. Buie 4.49, g.(2) of the Bules and Begulations of the Department of Correction provides that in .sentence institutions the disciplinary hoard shall consist of three members, one of whom must be a Deputy Warden. At none of the three disciplinary hearings affecting relator was such an officer present. Instead, a Captain presided as chairman at such hearing. The departmental rule that the board consist of a member who is of the rank of Deputy Warden is mandatory. The board thus was improperly constituted and its action in levying loss of good time as punishment for relator’s infractions is a nullity. Inasmuch as relator’s scheduled release date was June 7, 1973, calculated on no loss of good time, his discharge is ordered forthwith.
Leo Lionel PAYNE, Petitioner, v. Jessica MANGUM.

No. 19-7591.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 6, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AVONDALE INCORPORATED FOR THE 
NINE MONTHS ENDED MAY 29, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE 
TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-29-1998
<CASH>                                           3,135
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,264
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,283
<INVENTORY>                                    147,295
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               216,958
<PP&E>                                         503,170
<DEPRECIATION>                                 258,732
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 483,745
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           90,600
<BONDS>                                        268,525
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           127
<OTHER-SE>                                      89,793
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   483,745
<SALES>                                        790,352
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               790,352
<CGS>                                          661,740
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  729,724
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,747
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,137
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,482
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,399
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,480
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,919
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,919
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.71
        

</TABLE>
Henrikas MALUKAS, Petitioner, v. William P. BARR, Attorney General.

No. 19-1117.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/27/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      147,129
COMMITMENTS
  47,155   32,848   12,524   70,602   80,164  130,281  125,536   16,848   21,593

CHANGES FROM 08/20/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -2,665)
   2,135     -135   -2,428   -1,810    1,516   -2,102   -1,046     -563   -1,619

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    32.1     22.3      8.5     48.0     54.5     88.5     85.3     11.5     14.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      179)
      49       43       40       64       66      131      135
```

----

Updated August 30, 2013
# C_2017205EN.01005501.xml

| 29.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/55

---

Explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

(2017/C 205/06)

Pursuant to the second indent of Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1), the explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are hereby amended as follows:

1

2

On page 381,
  ‘9503 00 10 Tricycles, scooters, pedal cars and similar wheeled toys; dolls’ carriages’, the following text is inserted after the existing text:

On page 381,

‘9503 00 10 Tricycles, scooters, pedal cars and similar wheeled toys; dolls’ carriages’

the following text is inserted after the existing text:

‘This subheading also includes scooters fitted with an auxiliary motor, provided that the following limits are not exceeded:

| — | a speed not exceeding 20 km per hour, |
| --- | --- |

—

a speed not exceeding 20 km per hour,

| — | a net weight not exceeding 12 kg, |
| --- | --- |

—

a net weight not exceeding 12 kg,

| — | one-speed transmission, |
| --- | --- |

—

one-speed transmission,

| — | only one hand brake or a foot brake on the rear wheel. |
| --- | --- |

—

only one hand brake or a foot brake on the rear wheel.

Whenever one of the above criteria is not met, scooters fitted with an auxiliary motor must be classified in heading 8711.’

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1).

1

(2)  OJ C 76, 4.3.2015, p. 1.

2

---