alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017041EN.01000401.xml

| 8.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 41/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 41/4

---

Notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2017/C 41/05)

Further to the publication of a notice of impending expiry (1) following which no duly substantiated request for a review was lodged, the Commission gives notice that the anti-dumping measure mentioned below will expire.

1

This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (2).

2

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Steel ropes and cables | Ukraine
  Moldova | Anti-dumping duty | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 102/2012 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of steel ropes and cables originating in the People’s Republic of China and Ukraine as extended to imports of steel ropes and cables consigned from Morocco, Moldova and the Republic of Korea, whether declared as originating in these countries or not, following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 and terminating the expiry review proceeding concerning imports of steel ropes and cables originating in South Africa pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (OJ L 36, 9.2.2012, p. 1). | 10.2.2017 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Steel ropes and cables

Ukraine

Moldova

Anti-dumping duty

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 102/2012 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of steel ropes and cables originating in the People’s Republic of China and Ukraine as extended to imports of steel ropes and cables consigned from Morocco, Moldova and the Republic of Korea, whether declared as originating in these countries or not, following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 and terminating the expiry review proceeding concerning imports of steel ropes and cables originating in South Africa pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (OJ L 36, 9.2.2012, p. 1).

10.2.2017

---

(1)  OJ C 180, 19.5.2016, p. 2.

1

(2)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

2

(3)  The measure will expire at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
Evanglin MCCAIN, Petitioner, v. A.F. EVANS COMPANY, INC., et al.

No. 19-7700.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District denied.
Julius BARBOUR, et al., Petitioners, v. HALLIBURTON COMPANY, et al.

No. 19-739.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Motion of Patrick A. Juneau, in His Capacity as New Class Claims Administrator of the Punitive Damages Settlement Program for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
- 1 - 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

VIRTAMOVE, CORP. § 

 § CASE NO. 2:24-cv-00093-JRG 

v. § (Lead Case) 

 § 

HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE § 

COMPANY §

 

VIRTAMOVE, CORP. § 

 § 

v. § CASE NO. 2:24-cv-00064-JRG 

 § (Member Case) 

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS § 

MACHINES CORP. § 

ORDER 

The above-captioned cases are hereby ORDERED to be CONSOLIDATED for all 

pretrial issues with the LEAD CASE, Case No. 2:24-cv-00093. All parties are instructed to file 

any future filings in the LEAD CASE. Individual cases remain active for trial. 

The Clerk is instructed to add the consolidated Defendants into the Lead Case and their 

corresponding Lead and Local Counsel only. Additional counsel may file a Notice of Appearance 

in the Lead Case if they wish to continue as counsel of record in the lead consolidated action. 

Counsel who has appeared pro hac vice in any member case may file a Notice of Appearance in 

the Lead Case without filing an additional application to appear pro hac vice in the Lead Case. 

Counsel who have not appeared in a member case at the point when it is consolidated into the Lead 

Case should file a Notice of Appearance only in the Lead Case, and such Notice should state the 

relevant member case. 

Case 2:24-cv-00064-JRG Document 22 Filed 04/17/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 139
- 2 - 

____________________________________

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 17th day of April, 2024.

Case 2:24-cv-00064-JRG Document 22 Filed 04/17/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 140
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 07/30/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       36,779
COMMITMENTS
   3,089    7,864    1,088   21,113   16,429   25,290   25,381   11,489   11,397

CHANGES FROM 07/23/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,759)
    -941      756      330     -952   -2,117   -1,563   -1,031     -196     -727

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     8.4     21.4      3.0     57.4     44.7     68.8     69.0     31.2     31.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       60)
       7       14        7       34       26       45       44
```

----

Updated August 2, 2013
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

SECTION 906CERTIFICATION—CEO

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of J.B. Poindexter & Co., Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John B. Poindexter,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

To the best of my knowledge,after reasonable investigation:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  April 3, 2008 |   | By  /s/ John B. Poindexter                  |
|----------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|                 |   | John  B. Poindexter, Chairman of the Board, |
|                 |   | President  and Chief Executive Officer      |

 

The foregoing certificationis being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separatedisclosure document.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
H. Con. Res. 120 Agreed to December 4, 2014

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR CEREMONY TO 

PRESENT CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL TO WORLD WAR 

II MEMBERS OF CIVIL AIR PATROL. 

Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center is authorized 

to be used on December 10, 2014, for a ceremony to present the 

Congressional Gold Medal to the World War II members of the 

Civil Air Patrol collectively, in recognition of the military service 

and exemplary record of the Civil Air Patrol during World War 

II. Physical preparations for the conduct of the ceremony shall 

be carried out in accordance with such conditions as the Architect 

of the Capitol may prescribe. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,154,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,141,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    359,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,015,000
<PP&E>                                       6,906,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,897,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,230,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,545,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,897,000
<SALES>                                     19,012,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,012,000
<CGS>                                       14,688,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,846,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,182,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               761,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             977,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (781,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (781,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (781,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 05/21/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      434,988
COMMITMENTS
 111,468  165,081  102,887  190,465  131,767  404,820  399,735   30,168   35,253

CHANGES FROM 05/14/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     14,945)
    -525   -3,339    6,730    5,555    8,426   11,760   11,817    3,185    3,128

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    25.6     38.0     23.7     43.8     30.3     93.1     91.9      6.9      8.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      188)
      57       80       82       35       36      141      161
```

----

Updated May 24, 2013
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT 

TO FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS

1. I, Keith Link , make this declaration

pursuant to Section 27(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) and/or Section 

21D(a)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) as amended by the Private 

Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

2. I have reviewed a Complaint against DZS Inc. (“DZS”) and authorize the filing of 

a comparable complaint on my behalf.

3. I did not purchase or acquire DZS securities at the direction of counsel or in order 

to participate in any private action arising under the Securities Act or Exchange Act.

4. I am willing to serve as a representative party on behalf of a Class of investors who 

purchased or otherwise acquired DZS securities during the Class Period as specified in the 

Complaint, including providing testimony at deposition and trial, if necessary. I understand that 

the Court has the authority to select the most adequate lead plaintiff in this action.

5. The attached sheet lists all of my transactions in DZS securities during the Class 

Period as specified in the Complaint.

6. During the three-year period preceding the date on which this Certification is 

signed, I have not served or sought to serve as a representative party on behalf of a class under the 

federal securities laws.

7. I agree not to accept any payment for serving as a representative party on behalf of 

the Class as set forth in the Complaint, beyond my pro rata share of any recovery, except such 

reasonable costs and expenses directly relating to the representation of the class as ordered or 

approved by the Court.

DocuSign Envelope ID: BDA5B9CF-F606-4E9E-8D73-D0AC9BE691ED Case 4:23-cv-00603-SDJ Document 1-1 Filed 06/27/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 23
8. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America 

that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed 

(Date)

(Signature)

Keith Link

(Type or Print Name)

DocuSign Envelope ID: BDA5B9CF-F606-4E9E-8D73-D0AC9BE691ED

6/14/2023

/6CC0F0E09454O6 ... 

Case 4:23-cv-00603-SDJ Document 1-1 Filed 06/27/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 24
Ghazala SIDDIQUI, et vir, Individually and as Personal Representatives of the Estate of Raheel Siddiqui, Deceased, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-913.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Gale ZAMORE, Petitioner, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, Individually and as Trustee for JP Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Trust 2007-CH5 Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates Series 2007-CH5, et al.

No. 19-125.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000911167
<NAME>                        ARIEL CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         5,057,362
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,611,372
<ALLOWANCES>                                   178,416
<INVENTORY>                                    3,696,574
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               10,696,974
<PP&E>                                         4,877,346
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,381,946
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 13,997,047
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,010,107
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       9,229,125
<OTHER-SE>                                     7,577,711
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   13,997,047
<SALES>                                        10,104,405
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               10,104,405
<CGS>                                          5,576,133
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,576,133
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               14,933,686
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             147,709
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (10,125,992)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (10,125,992)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (10,125,992)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (1.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.99)
        


</TABLE>
Michael A. WILLNER, et ux., Petitioners v. James DIMON, et al.

No. 19-74

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
Timothy C. YOAKUM, Petitioner, v. SABRE GLBL INCORPORATED.

No. 19-1109.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 18, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Mario Lee BROWN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5158.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit P

Redacted in Entirety

Case 2:24-cv-00021-JRG Document 54-17 Filed 07/18/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 3203
John MCMAHON, in His Official Capacity as Sheriff of San Bernadino County, et al., Petitioners, v. CHEMEHUEVI INDIAN TRIBE, et al.

No. 19-820.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
W.M.V.C., et al., Petitioners, v. William P. BARR, Attorney General.

No. 19-506.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Garry Dean STRONER, Petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 19-7496.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 43 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.43
                                         Agreed to July 11, 2013        

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and thirteen

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR CEREMONY HONORING NELSON 
              MANDELA.

    Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center is authorized to be 
used on July 18, 2013, for a ceremony honoring the life and legacy of 
Nelson Mandela on the occasion of the 95th anniversary of his birth. 
Physical preparations for the ceremony shall be carried out in 
accordance with such conditions as the Architect of the Capitol may 
prescribe.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
Lisa GINDI, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, et al.

No. 19-1089.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 20, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
# C_2017188EN.01000301.xml

| 14.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 188/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 188/3

---

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006
   (1)
  )

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006

1

)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 188/03)

Decisions granting an authorisation

Decisions granting an authorisation

| Reference of the decision (2) | Date of decision | Substance name | Holder of the authorisation | Authorisation number | Authorised use | Date of expiry of review period | Reasons for the decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C(2017) 3764 | 7 June 2017 | Sodium dichromate
  EC No 234-190-3
  CAS No 7789-12-0 10588-01-9 | Solvay Portugal – Produtos Quimicos S.A., Rua Eng. Clement Dumoulin, 2625-106 Povoa de Santa Iria, Portugal | REACH/17/17/0 | Use of sodium dichromate as an additive for supressing parasitic reactions and oxygen evolution, pH buffering and cathode corrosion protection in the electrolytic manufacture of sodium chlorate with or without subsequent production of chlorine dioxide or sodium chlorite | 21 September 2029 | In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socioeconomic benefits outweigh the risk to human health arising from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies |

Reference of the decision (2)

2

Date of decision

Substance name

Holder of the authorisation

Authorisation number

Authorised use

Date of expiry of review period

Reasons for the decision

C(2017) 3764

7 June 2017

Sodium dichromate

EC No 234-190-3

CAS No 7789-12-0 10588-01-9

Solvay Portugal – Produtos Quimicos S.A., Rua Eng. Clement Dumoulin, 2625-106 Povoa de Santa Iria, Portugal

REACH/17/17/0

Use of sodium dichromate as an additive for supressing parasitic reactions and oxygen evolution, pH buffering and cathode corrosion protection in the electrolytic manufacture of sodium chlorate with or without subsequent production of chlorine dioxide or sodium chlorite

21 September 2029

In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socioeconomic benefits outweigh the risk to human health arising from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

1

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/chemicals/reach/about/index_en.htm

2

---
Savon Germain CARTER, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6942.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Kyle BROOKS, Petitioner, v. COLORADO.

No. 19-1050.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Colorado denied.